16.02.2014 Views

2011-2012 - Boces

2011-2012 - Boces

2011-2012 - Boces

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

ARTS IN EDUCATION<br />

P/NW BOCES, 200 BOCES DRIVE, YORKTOWN HEIGHTS, NY 10598<br />

914/248-2349 - fax # 914/248-3838 - email # msherer@pnwboces.org<br />

WEBSITE: http://www.pnwboces.org/artsined/<br />

MICHELLE SHERER - ARTS COORDINATOR<br />

Summer, <strong>2012</strong><br />

Dear ARTS Representatives:<br />

This School Program Evaluation Book has been compiled from all the in-school Arts programs/events that<br />

were contracted through the Putnam/Northern Westchester Arts In Education Service during the 201-<strong>2012</strong><br />

school year.<br />

HOW TO USE:<br />

1. The Evaluations are in alphabetical order either by the first name or by the name of the<br />

company/organization.<br />

2. The Evaluations were completed by participants who viewed the presentations.<br />

3. In the majority of cases, there is at least one Evaluation for each in-school program/event.<br />

4. In few cases, where several Evaluations were received for a single program/event, the responses were<br />

combined and averaged out for each of the categories but all the comments were included. However,<br />

those Evaluations when the respondents’ views were widely different have been entered separately.<br />

If you have any questions, please feel free to contact me at: 914/248-2349 or email msherer@pnwboces.org<br />

I’m looking forward to another successful year working with you.<br />

Very truly yours,<br />

Michelle Sherer <br />

Arts In Education Coordinator


PUTNAM/NORTHERN WESTCHESTER BOCES<br />

ARTS IN EDUCATION SERVICE<br />

<strong>2011</strong>-<strong>2012</strong> SCHOOL’S EVALUATION FORM<br />

TO BE COMPLETED BY SCHOOL CONTRACT #A - .<br />

NAME OF EVALUATOR:___________________________________________________ POSITION:_________________________<br />

NAME OF ARTIST: _______________________________________________ DATE OF PROGRAM:________________________<br />

NAME OF PROGRAM:_________________________________________________________________________________________<br />

DISTRICT: ____________________________________________ BUILDING:____________________________________________<br />

# OF TEACHERS<br />

# OF STUDENTS GRADE DOING THIS<br />

ATTENDING: _______________ LEVEL(S): __________________ EVALUATION:_________________<br />

YOU MUST CHECK A STANDARD AND THE ART FORM(S) OF THE PROGRAM<br />

(check all that apply)<br />

Art Standards 1. { } Creating, Performing and Participating in the Arts<br />

2. { } Knowing and Using Arts Materials and Resources<br />

3. { } Responding to and Analyzing Various Works of Art<br />

4. { } Understanding the Cultural Contributions of the Arts<br />

(SEE A COPY OF THE LEARNING STANDARDS FOR THE ARTS FOR MORE INDEPTH DESCRIPTIONS)<br />

Art Form(s) In-School Out of School:<br />

Music____ Assembly____ Tour____<br />

Dance/Movement___ Workshop____ Tickets____<br />

Drama/Theatre Arts____ Residency____ Field Trip____<br />

Literature/Writing____ # of Sessions____ Other_______________<br />

Storytelling____ Other_______________ _______________<br />

Visual Arts____<br />

_______________<br />

Media Arts____<br />

Please rate the program according to the criteria listed below. Use a rating of l - 5 points.<br />

1=POOR, 2=FAIR, 3=GOOD, 4=VERY GOOD, 5=EXCELLENT<br />

1. STUDENT RESPONSE<br />

Artist engaged students' interest and attention; Applause and laughter was genuine and<br />

enthusiastic; Restlessness was minimal; When invited to participate, students were eager,<br />

questions to artist indicated that students understood the presentation.<br />

2. ARTISTIC QUALITY<br />

Artist demonstrated skill and dedication to their art; Repertoire was appropriate and well<br />

chosen for students' age and interest levels; Art form was presented in an attractive, enjoyable,<br />

artistic manner.<br />

3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY<br />

Artist helped students to understand aspects of the creative process; Artist related their art<br />

form and repertoire to students' context and real life experiences; Relationships between art<br />

form and other curriculum areas were elucidated; Artist helped children to see/hear with<br />

discrimination.<br />

<strong>2011</strong>-<strong>2012</strong> SCHOOL’S EVALUATION FORM<br />

_______<br />

_______<br />

_______<br />

more on other side


4. ARTIST' INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS<br />

Artist appeared to genuinely enjoy working with children; Artist encouraged students to<br />

participate in the program and helped them do so in a meaningful way; Artist listened during<br />

students' question and answer period; Artist used vocabulary which were within the grasp<br />

of students.<br />

5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM<br />

Speakers could be easily heard; performers could be seen; Lighting, props and sound<br />

effects were effective; Costumes were imaginative, colorful and appropriate; Elements of<br />

surprise and humor were included in presentation; Program was well-paced; Performers<br />

began and ended on time.<br />

6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDES/SUPPORT MATERIALS<br />

Materials were provided for teachers and/or students; They were attractive, well designed<br />

and clear; Materials arrived at least two weeks before the program; Materials included<br />

suggestions for teachers which were helpful in preparing students for program; Follow-up<br />

activities were provided; Guide included information about the artist, the repertoire,<br />

vocabulary terms, bibliography, resources for teachers and students .<br />

_______<br />

_______<br />

_______<br />

7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM TO OTHER SCHOOL DISTRICTS? _______<br />

PLEASE EXPLAIN: ________________________________________________________________________<br />

__________________________________________________________________________________________<br />

__________________________________________________________________________________________<br />

8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTISTS FOR IMPROVEMENT: ________________________________________<br />

__________________________________________________________________________________________<br />

__________________________________________________________________________________________<br />

9. OTHER COMMENTS: ____________________________________________________________________<br />

__________________________________________________________________________________________<br />

__________________________________________________________________________________________<br />

PLEASE NOTE:<br />

We cannot generate payment to the artist/organization until we receive this<br />

completed evaluation form from your school. Please return this form as soon as<br />

possible after the program. Send it to:<br />

Michelle Sherer<br />

Arts in Education Coordinator<br />

Putnam/Northern Westchester BOCES<br />

200 BOCES Drive<br />

Yorktown Heights, NY 10598-4399<br />

Phone # 914/248-2349 - Fax # 914/248-3838 OR 248-2390<br />

msherer@pnwboces.org - http://pnwboces.org/artsined


ARTIST: 2 HANDS 2 LEARN CONTRACT #: A8636<br />

TITLE OF PROGRAM: JUDY LEWIS - COLONIAL PAPER MAKING<br />

TYPE OF PROGRAM: WORKSHOP<br />

DISTRICT/ SCHOOL:<br />

# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />

CROTON/CET ELEM.<br />

# OF STUDENTS: GRADE(S) 4<br />

DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 6/7-11/12<br />

NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />

STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 X STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4 X<br />

ARTIST: 2 HANDS 2 LEARN CONTRACT #: A8795<br />

TITLE OF PROGRAM: JUDY LEWIS - COLONIAL PAPER MAKING<br />

TYPE OF PROGRAM: WORKSHOP<br />

DISTRICT/ SCHOOL: NEW ROCHELLE/TRINITY ELEM. SCHOOL<br />

# OF TEACHERS: 3<br />

# OF STUDENTS: 150 GRADE(S) 4<br />

DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 6/14-18/12<br />

NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />

STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 X STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4 X<br />

1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />

1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />

1.<br />

2.<br />

3.<br />

4.<br />

5.<br />

6.<br />

STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />

ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />

EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />

ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />

TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />

QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />

4<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />

FANTASTIC AND APPROPRIATE PROGRAM. AMY WAS VERY<br />

KNOWLEDGEABLE AND DID A FANTASTIC JOB.<br />

8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />

A 3RD STATION, TO LIMIT DOWN TIME FOR STUDENTS WHO FINISH.<br />

9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />

THE TEACHERS WERE DISAPPOINTED WITH THE VOLUNTEER WHO<br />

HELPED OUT.<br />

1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />

2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />

3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />

4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />

5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />

6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />

7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />

NONE<br />

8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />

NONE<br />

9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />

NONE<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

ARTIST: 2 HANDS 2 LEARN CONTRACT #: A7793<br />

TITLE OF PROGRAM: JUDY LEWIS - EXPLORING OUR FIVE SENSES<br />

TYPE OF PROGRAM: WORKSHOP<br />

DISTRICT/ SCHOOL:<br />

# OF TEACHERS: 5<br />

TUCKAHOE/W. E. COTTLE ELEM.<br />

# OF STUDENTS: 120 GRADE(S) K<br />

DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 1/4 & 5/12<br />

NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />

STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 X STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4 X<br />

ARTIST: 2 HANDS 2 LEARN CONTRACT #: A8861<br />

TITLE OF PROGRAM: JUDY LEWIS - INUIT CULTURES<br />

TYPE OF PROGRAM: WORKSHOP<br />

DISTRICT/ SCHOOL:<br />

# OF TEACHERS: 2<br />

BRIARCLIFF/TODD ELEM.<br />

# OF STUDENTS: 112 GRADE(S) 5<br />

DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 5/31/12<br />

NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />

STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 X STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4 X<br />

1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />

1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />

1.<br />

2.<br />

3.<br />

4.<br />

5.<br />

6.<br />

STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />

ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />

EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />

ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />

TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />

QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />

4<br />

5<br />

5<br />

4<br />

4<br />

5<br />

7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />

THIS WAS A GREAT PROGRAM. THE STUDENTS RESPONDED WELL<br />

TO THE STORIES AND REALLY ENJOYED IT.<br />

8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />

NONE<br />

9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />

THE STUDENTS WERE FULLY ENGAGED THE WHOLE TIME.<br />

1.<br />

2.<br />

3.<br />

4.<br />

5.<br />

6.<br />

STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />

ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />

EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />

ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />

TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />

QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />

3<br />

5<br />

3<br />

5<br />

3<br />

2<br />

7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />

WE LIKE THE TOPIC BUT FEEL THE PRESENTER HAD WEAK<br />

MANAGEMENT SKILLS. ALSO NEED A BETTER OUTLINE OF WHAT IS<br />

TO BE COVERED AND HOW.<br />

8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />

NONE<br />

9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />

STUDENTS WERE ENGAGED IN THE ACTIVITIES.<br />

Arts in Education Service - School Evaluations <strong>2011</strong>-<strong>2012</strong><br />

Page 1 of 332


ARTIST: 2 HANDS 2 LEARN CONTRACT #: A7767<br />

TITLE OF PROGRAM: MARGARET VON DE MEDEN - NATIVE AMERICAN<br />

CULTURES<br />

TYPE OF PROGRAM: WORKSHOP<br />

DISTRICT/ SCHOOL:<br />

# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />

YORKTOWN/MOHANSIC ELEM.<br />

# OF STUDENTS: 220 GRADE(S) K-2<br />

DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 11/1-4/11<br />

NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />

STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 X STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4 X<br />

ARTIST: 2 HANDS 2 LEARN CONTRACT #: A8195<br />

TITLE OF PROGRAM: MARGARET VON DE MEDEN & JULIE MINTER - NATIVE<br />

AMERICAN CULTURES<br />

TYPE OF PROGRAM: WORKSHOP<br />

DISTRICT/ SCHOOL: EASTCHESTER/WAVERLY EARLY CHILDHOOD CTR<br />

# OF TEACHERS: 10 # OF STUDENTS: 224 GRADE(S) 1<br />

DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 11/7-10/11<br />

NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />

STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 X STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4 X<br />

1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />

1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />

1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />

2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />

3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />

4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />

5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />

6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />

7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />

WE HAVE BEEN WORKING WITH THIS GROUP FOR MANY YEARS<br />

AND THEY ARE ALWAYS PROFESSIONAL, INFORMATIVE AND<br />

INTERESTING.<br />

8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />

NONE<br />

9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />

NONE<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />

2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />

3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />

4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />

5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />

6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />

7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />

VERY INFORMATIVE AND AGE APPROPRIATE WITH HANDS-ON<br />

INTERACTIVE ACTIVITIES THAT ARE A STRONG CONTRIBUTOR TO<br />

THE LEARNING PROCESS. THE STUDENTS ARE MOTIVATED, THE<br />

MATERIAL IS RELEVANT TO THE CURRICULUM.<br />

8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />

CONSIDER STUDENTS WITH ALLERGIES TO FOODS SUCH AS<br />

POPCORN , TREE AND PLANT PRODUCTS FOR THE FACE PAINTING<br />

PORTION OF THE PROGRAM.<br />

9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />

GREAT PROGRAM - A KEEPER.<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

ARTIST: 3SCREEN.COM<br />

CONTRACT #: A8478<br />

TITLE OF PROGRAM: I CAN DO THAT MULTI-MEDIA SHOW<br />

TYPE OF PROGRAM: ASSEMBLY<br />

DISTRICT/ SCHOOL: NEW ROCHELLE/DAVIS ELEM. SCHOOL<br />

# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />

# OF STUDENTS: 700 GRADE(S) K-5<br />

DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 3/7/12<br />

NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />

STANDARD 1 STANDARD 2 STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />

ARTIST: A MAZE IN POTTERY, INC.<br />

CONTRACT #: A7547<br />

TITLE OF PROGRAM: AGGIE RADZIK - POTTERY CREATIONS<br />

TYPE OF PROGRAM: WORKSHOP<br />

DISTRICT/ SCHOOL: KATONAH/LEWISBORO/KATONAH ELEM. SCHOOL<br />

# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />

# OF STUDENTS: 9 GRADE(S) K-2<br />

DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 9/23-12/16/11<br />

NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />

STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 X STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4 X<br />

1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />

1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />

1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />

2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />

3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />

4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />

5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />

6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />

4<br />

4<br />

4<br />

5<br />

5<br />

3<br />

1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />

2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />

3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />

4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />

5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />

6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />

4<br />

4<br />

4<br />

4<br />

4<br />

4<br />

7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />

MOTIVATIONAL CHARGED ASSEMBLIES. THIS PROVIDES A<br />

MESSAGE, KINDNESS, HELPING OTHERS IN A COLORFUL AND<br />

ENTERTAINING MANNER.<br />

8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />

THE GUIDE COULD USE SOME "TWEAKS"<br />

9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />

NONE<br />

7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />

CLASSES ARE WELL RUN AND ORGANIZED AND OUR STUDENTS<br />

ALWAYS ENJOY IT.<br />

8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />

NONE<br />

9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />

NONE<br />

Arts in Education Service - School Evaluations <strong>2011</strong>-<strong>2012</strong><br />

Page 2 of 332


ARTIST: AARON SALAZAR<br />

CONTRACT #: A8399<br />

TITLE OF PROGRAM: CHOREOGRAPHER FOR THE SPRING MUSICAL - BYE,<br />

BYE BIRDIE<br />

TYPE OF PROGRAM: RESIDENCY<br />

DISTRICT/ SCHOOL: IRVINGTON/IRVINGTON HIGH SCHOOL<br />

# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />

# OF STUDENTS: 70 GRADE(S) 9-12<br />

DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 1/23-3/17/12<br />

NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />

STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 X STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />

1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />

ARTIST: ACADEMIC ENTERTAINMENT, INC. CONTRACT #: A8564<br />

TITLE OF PROGRAM: 3SCREENS A MULTI MEDIA SHOW - @ MY BEST<br />

TYPE OF PROGRAM: ASSEMBLY<br />

DISTRICT/ SCHOOL:<br />

# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />

YORKTOWN/CROMPOND ELEM.<br />

# OF STUDENTS: 400 GRADE(S) 4 & 5<br />

DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 3/23/12<br />

NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />

STANDARD 1 STANDARD 2 STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />

1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />

1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />

2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />

3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />

4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />

5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />

6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />

7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />

AARON TAUGHT THE STUDENTS A LOT ABOUT DANCE AND WAS<br />

GREAT WITH THOSE WHO HADN'T DANCED BEFORE.<br />

8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />

NONE<br />

9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />

NONE<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

N/<br />

N/<br />

1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />

2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />

3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />

4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />

5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />

6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />

7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />

NONE<br />

8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />

NONE<br />

9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />

NONE<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

ARTIST: ACADEMIC ENTERTAINMENT, INC. CONTRACT #: A7770<br />

TITLE OF PROGRAM: 3SCREENS A MULTI MEDIA SHOW - IMAGES &<br />

MIRAGES<br />

TYPE OF PROGRAM: ASSEMBLY<br />

DISTRICT/ SCHOOL:<br />

# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />

MTP/WESTLAKE MIDDLE SCHOOL<br />

# OF STUDENTS: GRADE(S) 6-8<br />

DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 12/16/11<br />

NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />

STANDARD 1 STANDARD 2 STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />

1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />

ARTIST: ACADEMIC ENTERTAINMENT, INC. CONTRACT #: A7804A<br />

TITLE OF PROGRAM: PATRICK DUNNING - THE SIGNATURE PROJECT<br />

TYPE OF PROGRAM: ASSEMBLY<br />

DISTRICT/ SCHOOL: CHAPPAQUA/BELL MIDDLE SCHOOL<br />

# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />

# OF STUDENTS: 175 GRADE(S) 5<br />

DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 10/17/11<br />

NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />

STANDARD 1 STANDARD 2 STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />

1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />

1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />

2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />

3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />

4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />

5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />

6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />

7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? ? WHY?<br />

A GOOD PROGRAM BUT DISCUSSION MATERIALS WOULD BE<br />

BENEFICIAL.<br />

8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />

BETTER INTRODUCTION AND QUESTIONS WOULD HAVE HELPED<br />

IMPROVE THE PROGRAM.<br />

9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />

NONE<br />

4<br />

3<br />

4<br />

3<br />

5<br />

1<br />

1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />

2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />

3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />

4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />

5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />

6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />

7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />

ONE OF THE BEST PROGRAMS WE HAVE HAD.<br />

8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />

NONE<br />

9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />

NONE<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

N/<br />

Arts in Education Service - School Evaluations <strong>2011</strong>-<strong>2012</strong><br />

Page 3 of 332


ARTIST: ACADEMIC ENTERTAINMENT, INC. CONTRACT #: A7804B<br />

TITLE OF PROGRAM: PATRICK DUNNING - THE SIGNATURE PROJECT<br />

TYPE OF PROGRAM: ASSEMBLY<br />

DISTRICT/ SCHOOL: CHAPPAQUA/SEVEN BRIDGES MIDDLE SCHOOL<br />

# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />

# OF STUDENTS: GRADE(S) 5<br />

DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 11/10/11<br />

NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />

STANDARD 1 STANDARD 2 STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />

ARTIST: ADVENTURE GAME, INC.<br />

CONTRACT #: A8155<br />

TITLE OF PROGRAM: COLONIAL AMERICAN FAIR<br />

TYPE OF PROGRAM: WORKSHOP<br />

DISTRICT/ SCHOOL:<br />

# OF TEACHERS: 7<br />

MTP/COLUMBUS ELEM.<br />

# OF STUDENTS: 160 GRADE(S) 4<br />

DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 2/3/12<br />

NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />

STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 X STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4 X<br />

1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />

1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />

1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />

2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />

3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />

4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />

5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />

6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />

7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />

NONE<br />

8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />

THANKS FOR YOUR PATIENCE.<br />

9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />

SORRY ABOUT THE CONFUSION ON OUR END.<br />

4<br />

5<br />

4<br />

5<br />

5<br />

N/<br />

1.<br />

2.<br />

3.<br />

4.<br />

5.<br />

6.<br />

STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />

ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />

EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />

ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />

TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />

QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

4<br />

5<br />

4<br />

7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />

THIS IS A WONDERFUL WAY FOR STUDENTS TO EXPERIENCE WHAT<br />

THEY HAVE LEARNED BY LIVING IT ALL DAY LONG IN A VARIETY OF<br />

WAYS - HANDS-ON PARTICIPATION IS KEY.<br />

8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />

NONE<br />

9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />

PARENT VOLUNTEERS ARE NEEDED.<br />

ARTIST: ADVENTURE GAME, INC.<br />

CONTRACT #: A7572A<br />

TITLE OF PROGRAM: COLONIAL AMERICAN FAIR<br />

TYPE OF PROGRAM: WORKSHOP<br />

DISTRICT/ SCHOOL: EASTCHESTER/GREENVALE ELEM.<br />

# OF TEACHERS: 5<br />

# OF STUDENTS: 113 GRADE(S) 4<br />

DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 5/31/12<br />

NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />

STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 X STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4 X<br />

ARTIST: ADVENTURE GAME, INC.<br />

CONTRACT #: A8814A<br />

TITLE OF PROGRAM: COLONIAL AMERICAN FAIR<br />

TYPE OF PROGRAM: WORKSHOP<br />

DISTRICT/ SCHOOL: EASTCHESTER/ANNE HUTCHINSON ELEM.<br />

# OF TEACHERS: 3<br />

# OF STUDENTS: 113 GRADE(S) 4<br />

DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 5/7/12<br />

NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />

STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 X STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4 X<br />

1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />

1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />

1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />

2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />

3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />

4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />

5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />

6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />

7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />

THE PROGRAM WAS VERY INTERACTIVE AND THE STUDENTS<br />

ENJOYED IT.<br />

8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />

NONE<br />

9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />

NONE<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />

2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />

3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />

4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />

5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />

6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />

7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />

WONDERFULLY EDUCATIONAL AND INTERACTIVE. THE DAY WAS<br />

GREAT. MY STUDENTS LEARNED SO MUCH WITH ENGAGING,<br />

HANDS-ON EXPERIENCES.<br />

8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />

ASK TEACHERS SPRIOR TO LESSON IF THEY HAVE ANY SENSITIVE<br />

STUDENTS WHO MAY HAVE A DIFFICULT TIME WITH THE DUNCE<br />

CAP AND SIGN - VERY POPULAR STATION THOUGH. YOU MIGHT<br />

CONSIDER DRIED CORN AS AN ADDITIONAL STATION.<br />

9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />

DANCE INSTRUCTION WAS A STRUGGLE. CLEARER DIRECTIONS,<br />

LESS COMPLEX DANCES. THE "PEELING AWAY" WAS CONFUSING<br />

FOR ME TOO.<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

Arts in Education Service - School Evaluations <strong>2011</strong>-<strong>2012</strong><br />

Page 4 of 332


ARTIST: ADVENTURE GAME, INC.<br />

CONTRACT #: A8435<br />

TITLE OF PROGRAM: COLONIAL SPINNING & WEAVING<br />

TYPE OF PROGRAM: ASSEMBLY<br />

DISTRICT/ SCHOOL: LAKELAND/BENJAMIN FRANKLIN ELEM.<br />

# OF TEACHERS: 5<br />

# OF STUDENTS: 100 GRADE(S) 4<br />

DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 3/12/12<br />

NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />

STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 X STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4 X<br />

ARTIST: ADVENTURE GAME, INC.<br />

CONTRACT #: A8814B<br />

TITLE OF PROGRAM: SQUARE DANCING<br />

TYPE OF PROGRAM: WORKSHOP<br />

DISTRICT/ SCHOOL: EASTCHESTER/ANNE HUTCHINSON ELEM.<br />

# OF TEACHERS: 5<br />

# OF STUDENTS: 100 GRADE(S) 5<br />

DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 6/5/12<br />

NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />

STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 X STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4 X<br />

1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />

1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />

1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />

2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />

3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />

4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />

5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />

6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />

2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />

3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />

4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />

5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />

6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

N/<br />

7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM?<br />

NONE<br />

8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />

NONE<br />

9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />

THEY WERE GREAT.<br />

Y<br />

WHY?<br />

7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />

THESE MUSICIANS WER FUN TO WORK WITH. THEY DEFINITELY<br />

UNDERSTOOD THEIR AUDIENCE.<br />

8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />

NONE<br />

9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />

NONE<br />

ARTIST: ADVENTURE GAME, INC.<br />

CONTRACT #: A7572B<br />

TITLE OF PROGRAM: SQUARE DANCING<br />

TYPE OF PROGRAM: WORKSHOP<br />

DISTRICT/ SCHOOL: EASTCHESTER/GREENVALE ELEM.<br />

# OF TEACHERS: 6<br />

# OF STUDENTS: 125 GRADE(S) 5<br />

DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 6/7/12<br />

NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />

STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 X STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4 X<br />

ARTIST: AFRO BRAZIL ARTS, INC.<br />

CONTRACT #: A8876<br />

TITLE OF PROGRAM: CAPOEIRA WORKSHOP<br />

TYPE OF PROGRAM: WORKSHOP<br />

DISTRICT/ SCHOOL:<br />

# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />

ARDSLEY/CONCORD ROAD ELEM.<br />

# OF STUDENTS: 150 GRADE(S) 3<br />

DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 6/19/12<br />

NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />

STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 X STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4 X<br />

1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />

1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />

1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />

2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />

3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />

4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />

5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />

6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />

7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />

STUDENTS HAD A GREAT TIME LEARNING TO SQUARE DANCE.<br />

8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />

NONE<br />

9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />

DANCE TEACHERS WERE SO PROFESSIONAL.<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

N/<br />

1.<br />

2.<br />

3.<br />

4.<br />

5.<br />

6.<br />

STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />

ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />

EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />

ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />

TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />

QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />

THIS WAS A WONDERFUL SUPPLEMENT TO OUR SOCIAL STUDIES<br />

CURRICULUM AS WELL AS OUR FOCUS ON CULTURES<br />

THROUGHTOUT THE WORLD.<br />

8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />

NONE<br />

9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />

I THOUGHT THE PRESENTER'S MANAGEMENT WITH THE CHILDREN<br />

WAS VERY IMPRESSIVE. IT WAS SUPER.<br />

Arts in Education Service - School Evaluations <strong>2011</strong>-<strong>2012</strong><br />

Page 5 of 332


ARTIST: AGOSTINO & CO. PERFORMING ARTS, I<br />

CONTRACT #: A8471<br />

TITLE OF PROGRAM: CHRIS AGOSTINO - TRANSFORMATIONS &<br />

STORYTELLING<br />

TYPE OF PROGRAM: ASSEMBLY<br />

DISTRICT/ SCHOOL: LAKELAND/GEORGE WASHINGTON ELEM.<br />

# OF TEACHERS: 2<br />

# OF STUDENTS: 145 GRADE(S) K-4<br />

DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 2/16/12<br />

NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />

STANDARD 1 STANDARD 2 STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4 X<br />

ARTIST: AGOSTINO & CO. PERFORMING ARTS, I CONTRACT #: A7637<br />

TITLE OF PROGRAM: NED GELFER - JUGGLING, MAGIC & CIRCUS ARTS<br />

SHOW<br />

TYPE OF PROGRAM: ASSEMBLY<br />

DISTRICT/ SCHOOL:<br />

# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />

OSSINING/PARK SCHOOL<br />

# OF STUDENTS: 100 GRADE(S) PRE K &<br />

DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 9/23/11<br />

NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />

STANDARD 1 STANDARD 2 STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />

1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />

1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />

1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />

2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />

3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />

4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />

5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />

6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />

7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />

STUDENTS WERE EXCITED ABOUT THE STORIES TOLD WITH THE<br />

FACE PAINTING.<br />

8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />

NONE<br />

9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />

NONE<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />

2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />

3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />

4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />

5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />

6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />

7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />

NONE<br />

8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />

NONE<br />

9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />

NONE<br />

5<br />

5<br />

N/<br />

5<br />

5<br />

N/<br />

ARTIST: AIJA R. SEARS<br />

CONTRACT #: A8862<br />

TITLE OF PROGRAM: BOTANICAL ART PROGRAM<br />

TYPE OF PROGRAM: RESIDENCY<br />

DISTRICT/ SCHOOL:<br />

# OF TEACHERS: 3<br />

PELHAM/HUTCHINSON ELEM.<br />

# OF STUDENTS: 62 GRADE(S) 4<br />

DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 6/11-19/12<br />

NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />

STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 X STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />

ARTIST: AIJA R. SEARS<br />

CONTRACT #: A8546<br />

TITLE OF PROGRAM: BOTANICAL ART PROGRAM<br />

TYPE OF PROGRAM: RESIDENCY<br />

DISTRICT/ SCHOOL:<br />

# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />

PELHAM/PROSPECT HILL ELEM.<br />

# OF STUDENTS: 75 GRADE(S) 4<br />

DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 4/30-5/11/12<br />

NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />

STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 X STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />

1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />

1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />

1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />

2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />

3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />

4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />

5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />

6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />

7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />

SHE PROVIDED STUDENTS WITH AN IN-DEPTH UNDERSTANDING<br />

AND HANDS-ON APPROACH TO BOTANY.<br />

8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />

NONE.<br />

9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />

AMAZING ARTIST.<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

4<br />

5<br />

1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />

2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />

3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />

4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />

5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />

6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />

7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />

AIJA IS A DELIGHT AND RUNS A FANTASTIC, FUN, INTERESTING<br />

PROGRAM.<br />

8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />

AT TIMES, AIJA'S SOFT VOICE IS LOST AMOUNG THE EXCITEMENT<br />

AND CHATTER. IT WOULD HELP IF SHE WERE TO QUIET EVERYONE<br />

DOWN BEFORE SHE GIVES INSTRUCTION. SHE IS VERY<br />

KNOWLEDGEABLE AND SOMETIMES THE CHILDREN MISS WHAT<br />

SHE IS EXPLAINING BECAUSE THEY DON'T REALIZE SHE IS<br />

ADDRESSING THE CLASS.<br />

9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />

NONE<br />

3<br />

4<br />

4<br />

5<br />

2<br />

5<br />

Arts in Education Service - School Evaluations <strong>2011</strong>-<strong>2012</strong><br />

Page 6 of 332


ARTIST: AIMEE (BYRNE) BREHMER<br />

CONTRACT #: A8440<br />

TITLE OF PROGRAM: CHOREOGRAPHER FOR THE SHOW - A FUNNY THING<br />

HAPPENED ON THE WAY TO THE FORUM<br />

TYPE OF PROGRAM: RESIDENCY<br />

DISTRICT/ SCHOOL: PUTNAM VALLEY/PUTNAM VALLEY HIGH SCHOOL<br />

# OF TEACHERS: 3<br />

# OF STUDENTS: 400 GRADE(S) 9-12<br />

DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 3/3-4/23/12<br />

NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />

STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 X STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />

1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />

ARTIST: ALL FOR KIDZ, INC.<br />

CONTRACT #: A8400<br />

TITLE OF PROGRAM: THE NED SHOW<br />

TYPE OF PROGRAM: ASSEMBLY<br />

DISTRICT/ SCHOOL: KATONAH/LEWISBORO/LEWISBORO ELEM.<br />

# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />

# OF STUDENTS: 350 GRADE(S) K-5<br />

DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 2/16/12<br />

NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />

STANDARD 1 STANDARD 2 STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />

1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />

1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />

2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />

3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />

4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />

5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />

6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />

7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />

NONE<br />

8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />

NONE<br />

9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />

NONE<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />

2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />

3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />

4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />

5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />

6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />

7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />

GREAT PROGRAM AND WONDERFUL MESSAGE.<br />

8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />

HAVE A LITTLE MORE INTERACTION WITH THE AUDIENCE.<br />

9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />

OVERALL VERY ENGAGING AND FUN.<br />

4<br />

3<br />

4<br />

4<br />

3<br />

4<br />

ARTIST: ALLEN J. PERLIN<br />

CONTRACT #: A8251<br />

TITLE OF PROGRAM: COMPOSER FOR THE SHOW - LYSISTRATA<br />

TYPE OF PROGRAM: RESIDENCY<br />

DISTRICT/ SCHOOL: CHAPPAQUA/HORACE GREELEY HIGH SCHOOL<br />

# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />

# OF STUDENTS: 16 GRADE(S) 9-12<br />

DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 1/16-19/12<br />

NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />

STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />

1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />

ARTIST: ALLEN J. PERLIN<br />

CONTRACT #: A8486<br />

TITLE OF PROGRAM: COMPOSER FOR THE SHOW - SIX DEGREES OF<br />

SEPARATION<br />

TYPE OF PROGRAM: RESIDENCY<br />

DISTRICT/ SCHOOL: CHAPPAQUA/HORACE GREELEY HIGH SCHOOL<br />

# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />

# OF STUDENTS: 18 GRADE(S) 9-12<br />

DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 3/5-10/12<br />

NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />

STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />

1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />

1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />

2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />

3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />

4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />

5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />

6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />

7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />

ALLEN IS A TALENTED MUSICIAN.<br />

8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />

NONE<br />

9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />

NONE<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />

2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />

3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />

4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />

5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />

6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />

7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />

AJ IS A TALENTED COMPOSER AND WORKS WELL WITH THE<br />

STUDENTS.<br />

8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />

NONE<br />

9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />

I LOOK FORWARD TO WORKING WITH HIM AGAIN.<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

Arts in Education Service - School Evaluations <strong>2011</strong>-<strong>2012</strong><br />

Page 7 of 332


ARTIST: ALLEN STRAUSS<br />

CONTRACT #: A7864<br />

TITLE OF PROGRAM: BRAIN CHALLENGE TV GAME SHOW<br />

TYPE OF PROGRAM: ASSEMBLY<br />

DISTRICT/ SCHOOL: IRVINGTON/MAIN STREET SCHOOL<br />

# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />

# OF STUDENTS: 260 GRADE(S) 4 & 5<br />

DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 3/22/12<br />

NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />

STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />

ARTIST: ALLEN STRAUSS<br />

CONTRACT #: A7515<br />

TITLE OF PROGRAM: BRAIN CHALLENGE TV GAME SHOW<br />

TYPE OF PROGRAM: ASSEMBLY<br />

DISTRICT/ SCHOOL:<br />

# OF TEACHERS: 5<br />

CHAPPAQUA/GRAFFLIN ELEM.<br />

# OF STUDENTS: 113 GRADE(S) 4<br />

DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 6/18/12<br />

NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />

STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />

1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />

1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />

1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />

2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />

3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />

4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />

5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />

6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />

7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />

THE PRESENTERS ENGAGE THE STUDENTS IN A GAME SHOW<br />

ATMOSPHERE. IT IS BOTH ACADEMIC AND PHYSICAL<br />

CHALLENGES. THE STUDENTS LOVE IT.<br />

8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />

NONE<br />

9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />

THANK YOU FOR BRINGING BRAIN CHALLENGES TO OUR SCHOOL.<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

N/<br />

1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />

2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />

3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />

4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />

5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />

6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />

7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />

EDUCATIONAL AND LOTS OF FUN.<br />

8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />

NONE<br />

9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />

NONE<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

N/<br />

ARTIST: ALLEN STRAUSS<br />

CONTRACT #: A8216<br />

TITLE OF PROGRAM: BRAIN CHALLENGE TV GAME SHOW<br />

TYPE OF PROGRAM: ASSEMBLY<br />

DISTRICT/ SCHOOL: EASTCHESTER/ANNE HUTCHINSON ELEM.<br />

# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />

# OF STUDENTS: 100 GRADE(S) 5<br />

DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 2/3/12<br />

NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />

STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />

ARTIST: ALLEN STRAUSS<br />

CONTRACT #: A7580<br />

TITLE OF PROGRAM: BRAIN CHALLENGE TV GAME SHOW<br />

TYPE OF PROGRAM: ASSEMBLY<br />

DISTRICT/ SCHOOL: BYRAM HILLS/H.C. CRITTENDEN MIDDLE SCHOOL<br />

# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />

# OF STUDENTS: 400 GRADE(S) 6 & 7<br />

DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 2/13/12<br />

NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />

STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />

1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />

1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />

1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />

2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />

3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />

4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />

5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />

6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />

2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />

3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />

4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />

5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />

6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

N/<br />

7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />

SUCH A FUN AND INTERACTIVE PROGRAM. QUESTIONS WERE<br />

CHALLENGING AND ENGAGING.<br />

8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />

NONE<br />

9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />

NONE<br />

7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />

THE CHILDREN ABSOLUTELY LOVED IT. VERY LIVELY AND<br />

EDUCATIONAL.<br />

8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />

NONE<br />

9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />

NONE<br />

Arts in Education Service - School Evaluations <strong>2011</strong>-<strong>2012</strong><br />

Page 8 of 332


ARTIST: ALLEN STRAUSS<br />

CONTRACT #: A8418<br />

TITLE OF PROGRAM: BRAIN CHALLENGE TV GAME SHOW<br />

TYPE OF PROGRAM: ASSEMBLY<br />

DISTRICT/ SCHOOL:<br />

# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />

MTP/WESTLAKE MIDDLE SCHOOL<br />

# OF STUDENTS: 160 GRADE(S) 7<br />

DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 3/28/12<br />

NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />

STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />

ARTIST: ALLISON BLACK<br />

CONTRACT #: A8018<br />

TITLE OF PROGRAM: ZUMBA DANCING FOR JAZZ CO<br />

TYPE OF PROGRAM: WORKSHOP<br />

DISTRICT/ SCHOOL: TUCKAHOE/TUCKAHOE HIGH SCHOOL<br />

# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />

# OF STUDENTS: 60 GRADE(S) 9-12<br />

DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 11/28/11-3/3/12<br />

NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />

STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />

1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />

1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />

1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />

2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />

3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />

4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />

5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />

6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />

7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />

MIDDLE SCHOOL IS A VERY CHALLENGING AGE TO ENGAGE THE<br />

STUDENTS. THEY ALL LOVED THIS PROGRAM.<br />

8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />

NONE<br />

9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />

NONE<br />

ARTIST: ALVIN AILEY AMERICAN DANCE FOUND<br />

TITLE OF PROGRAM: STUDENT DANCERS<br />

TYPE OF PROGRAM: ASSEMBLY<br />

DISTRICT/ SCHOOL:<br />

NEW ROCHELLE/WARD ELEM. SCHOOL<br />

CONTRACT #: A7854<br />

# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />

# OF STUDENTS: 900 GRADE(S) K-4<br />

DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE<br />

11/16-18/11<br />

NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />

STANDARD 1 STANDARD 2 STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4 X<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

N/<br />

1.<br />

2.<br />

3.<br />

4.<br />

5.<br />

6.<br />

STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />

ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />

EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />

ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />

TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />

QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

N/<br />

7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />

DANCE IS EDUCATIONAL, CULTURAL, PHYSICALLY ACTIVE AND FUN.<br />

8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />

HIGHER LEVEL DANCE NEXT YEAR.<br />

9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />

NONE<br />

ARTIST: ALYSSA SATIN CAPUCILLI, INC.<br />

TITLE OF PROGRAM: AUTHOR VISIT<br />

TYPE OF PROGRAM: WORKSHOP<br />

DISTRICT/ SCHOOL:<br />

CONTRACT #: A7788<br />

KATONAH/LEWISBORO/KATONAH ELEM. SCHOOL<br />

# OF TEACHERS: 3<br />

# OF STUDENTS: 120 GRADE(S) K & 1<br />

DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 3/22/12<br />

NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />

STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 X STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />

1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />

1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />

1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />

2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />

3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />

4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />

5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />

6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />

7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />

THE DANCERS WERE CONFIDENT, STRONG AND TALENTED. THE<br />

STUDENTS WATCHING WERE IMPRESSED FROM WARMUP TO<br />

DANCE TO Q & A.<br />

8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />

NONE<br />

9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />

BEAUTIFUL, THE WHOLE SCHOOL ENJOYED THE PERFORMANCE.<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />

2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />

3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />

4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />

5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />

6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />

7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />

SHE WAS TERRIFIC. SHE HAD A WONDERFUL WAY WITH OUR<br />

CHILDREN. THEY LOVED MEETING HER.<br />

8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />

NONE<br />

9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />

NONE<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

N/<br />

Arts in Education Service - School Evaluations <strong>2011</strong>-<strong>2012</strong><br />

Page 9 of 332


ARTIST: ALYSSA SATIN CAPUCILLI, INC.<br />

CONTRACT #: A8407<br />

TITLE OF PROGRAM: AUTHOR VISIT<br />

TYPE OF PROGRAM: ASSEMBLY<br />

DISTRICT/ SCHOOL: EASTCHESTER/WAVERLY EARLY CHILDHOOD CTR<br />

# OF TEACHERS: 20 # OF STUDENTS: 500 GRADE(S) K & 1<br />

DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 3/16/12<br />

NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />

STANDARD 1 STANDARD 2 STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />

ARTIST: ALYSSA SATIN CAPUCILLI, INC.<br />

CONTRACT #: A8347<br />

TITLE OF PROGRAM: AUTHOR VISIT<br />

TYPE OF PROGRAM: ASSEMBLY<br />

DISTRICT/ SCHOOL:<br />

# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />

BRIARCLIFF/TODD ELEM.<br />

# OF STUDENTS: 200 GRADE(S) K & 1<br />

DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 1/24/12<br />

NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />

STANDARD 1 STANDARD 2 STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />

1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />

1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />

1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />

2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />

3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />

4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />

5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />

6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />

7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />

ALYSSA IS AN INSPIRATIONAL AND MOTIVATIONAL ARTIST FOR<br />

INTRODUCING WRITERS' WORKSHOP. SHE IS ALSO EXCELLENT<br />

FOR THE READING SKILLS REINFORCEMENT AND REPETITION.<br />

8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />

NOTHING. SHE WAS FABULOUS.<br />

9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />

RELATED VERY WELL TO THE CHILDREN. OUR STUDENTS WERE<br />

ENRICHED BY THE PRESENTATION AND WILL BE GROWING AS<br />

AUTHORS AND ILLUSTRATORS AS A RESULT OF THIS<br />

OUTSTANDING PRESENTATION.<br />

ARTIST: ALYSSA SATIN CAPUCILLI, INC.<br />

TITLE OF PROGRAM: AUTHOR VISIT<br />

TYPE OF PROGRAM: ASSEMBLY<br />

DISTRICT/ SCHOOL:<br />

SOMERS/PRIMROSE ELEM.<br />

CONTRACT #: A8711<br />

# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />

# OF STUDENTS: 240 GRADE(S) K<br />

DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE<br />

3/29-30/12<br />

NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />

STANDARD 1 STANDARD 2 STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

1.<br />

2.<br />

3.<br />

4.<br />

5.<br />

6.<br />

STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />

ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />

EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />

ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />

TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />

QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />

ALYSSA IS ENGAGING, INFORMATIVE AND KNOWS HER AUDIENCE.<br />

SHE IS THE CONSUMMATE AUTHOR PRO.<br />

8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />

NONE<br />

9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />

ARTIST:<br />

NONE<br />

AMADEUS MUSIC CONSERVATORY<br />

CONTRACT #: A7588<br />

TITLE OF PROGRAM: FRANK PIERANGEL - DRUM WORKSHOPS<br />

TYPE OF PROGRAM: WORKSHOP<br />

DISTRICT/ SCHOOL:<br />

KATONAH/LEWISBORO/KATONAH ELEM. SCHOOL<br />

# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />

# OF STUDENTS: 9 GRADE(S) 4 & 5<br />

DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE<br />

10/6-12/1/11<br />

NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />

STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 X STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />

1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />

1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />

1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />

2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />

3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />

4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />

5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />

6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />

2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />

3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />

4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />

5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />

6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />

4<br />

4<br />

4<br />

4<br />

4<br />

4<br />

7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM?<br />

SHE'S WONDERFUL ALWAYS.<br />

Y<br />

WHY?<br />

7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM?<br />

NONE<br />

Y<br />

WHY?<br />

8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />

NONE<br />

9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />

WE LOVE HER.<br />

8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />

NONE<br />

9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />

NONE<br />

Arts in Education Service - School Evaluations <strong>2011</strong>-<strong>2012</strong><br />

Page 10 of 332


ARTIST: AMERICAN BALLROOM THEATRE COMP CONTRACT #: A8030<br />

TITLE OF PROGRAM: IVELISSE HORNYAK DANCING CLASSROOMS - MAD<br />

HOT BALLROOM DANCING<br />

TYPE OF PROGRAM: RESIDENCY<br />

DISTRICT/ SCHOOL:<br />

# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />

PELHAM/COLONIAL ELEM.<br />

# OF STUDENTS: 23 GRADE(S) 4<br />

DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 12/16/11-3/14/12<br />

NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />

STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 X STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4 X<br />

ARTIST: AMERICAN BALLROOM THEATRE COMP<br />

CONTRACT #: A8181<br />

TITLE OF PROGRAM: IVELISSE HORNYAK DANCING CLASSROOMS -<br />

SOCIAL BALLROOM DANCING<br />

TYPE OF PROGRAM: RESIDENCY<br />

DISTRICT/ SCHOOL:<br />

# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />

PELHAM/HUTCHINSON ELEM.<br />

# OF STUDENTS: 70 GRADE(S) 5<br />

DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 12/15/11-3/15/12<br />

NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />

STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 X STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4 X<br />

1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />

1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />

1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />

2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />

3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />

4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />

5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />

6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />

7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />

SHE IS A WONDERFUL TEACHER. BESIDES DANCE, STUDENTS<br />

LEARNED RESPECT.<br />

8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />

NONE<br />

9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />

NONE<br />

4<br />

5<br />

4<br />

5<br />

5<br />

4<br />

1.<br />

2.<br />

3.<br />

4.<br />

5.<br />

6.<br />

STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />

ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />

EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />

ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />

TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />

QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />

IT MOTIVATES STUDENTS AND REINFORCES POSITIVE QUALITIES.<br />

8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />

NONE<br />

9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />

GREAT JOB.<br />

ARTIST: AMERICAN PLACE THEATRE<br />

CONTRACT #: A8069<br />

TITLE OF PROGRAM: THE THINGS THEY CARRIED<br />

TYPE OF PROGRAM: ASSEMBLY<br />

DISTRICT/ SCHOOL: LAKELAND/LAKELAND HIGH SCHOOL<br />

# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />

# OF STUDENTS: GRADE(S) 11<br />

DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 5/18/12<br />

NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />

STANDARD 1 STANDARD 2 STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4 X<br />

ARTIST: AMERICAN PROGRAM BUREAU<br />

CONTRACT #: A7852<br />

TITLE OF PROGRAM: RACHEL SIMMONS - AUTHOR VISIT<br />

TYPE OF PROGRAM: ASSEMBLY<br />

DISTRICT/ SCHOOL: KATONAH/LEWISBORO/JOHN JAY MIDDLE & HIGH SCH<br />

# OF TEACHERS: 5<br />

# OF STUDENTS: 300 GRADE(S) 6-12<br />

DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 11/9/11<br />

NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />

STANDARD 1 STANDARD 2 STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />

1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />

1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />

1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />

2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />

3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />

4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />

5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />

6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />

7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />

NONE<br />

8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />

WE RECOMMEND THAT THERE BE A MINIMAL INTRODUCTION WITH<br />

A Q & A PERIOD RESERVED FOR THE END OF THE PERFORMANCE.<br />

THIS WOULD PROVIDE FOR MEANINGFUL STUDENT/ACTOR<br />

DISCUSSION.<br />

9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />

NONE<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />

2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />

3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />

4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />

5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />

6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />

7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />

RACHEL IS A DRAMATIC, COMPELLING, ENTERTAINING<br />

STORYTELLER WHO CONNECTS EXTREMELY WELL WITH<br />

STUDENTS.<br />

8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />

IT WOULD BE GREAT IF RACHEL ALSO HAD AN ARTIST IN<br />

RESIDENCE PROGRAM FOR SMALL GROUPS OF STUDENTS.<br />

9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />

NONE<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

Arts in Education Service - School Evaluations <strong>2011</strong>-<strong>2012</strong><br />

Page 11 of 332


ARTIST: AMERICAN TAP DANCE FOUNDATION, I<br />

CONTRACT #: A7917<br />

TITLE OF PROGRAM: TAP CITY YOUTH ENSEMBLE - TAPPING INTO NEW<br />

YORK<br />

TYPE OF PROGRAM: ASSEMBLY<br />

DISTRICT/ SCHOOL: PLEASANTVILLE/BEDFORD ROAD ELEM.<br />

# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />

# OF STUDENTS: 640 GRADE(S) K-4<br />

DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 1/9/12<br />

NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />

STANDARD 1 STANDARD 2 STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4 X<br />

1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />

ARTIST: ANDREA DAVIS PINKNEY<br />

CONTRACT #: A8555<br />

TITLE OF PROGRAM: AUTHOR VISIT<br />

TYPE OF PROGRAM: ASSEMBLY<br />

DISTRICT/ SCHOOL: POCANTICO HILLS/POCANTICO HILLS MS<br />

# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />

# OF STUDENTS: 130 GRADE(S) 5-8<br />

DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 2/28/12<br />

NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />

STANDARD 1 STANDARD 2 STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4 X<br />

1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />

1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />

2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />

3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />

4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />

5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />

6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />

7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />

IT WAS FABULOUS AND THE STUDENTS LOVED IT.<br />

8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />

NONE<br />

9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />

NONE<br />

5<br />

4<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

1.<br />

2.<br />

3.<br />

4.<br />

5.<br />

6.<br />

STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />

ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />

EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />

ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />

TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />

QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

4<br />

7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />

ANDREA WAS FANTASTIC, VERY ENGAGING AND IMPRESSIVE<br />

PRESENTATION. HER BOOKS HELP STUDENTS LEARN ABOUT<br />

MANY IMPORTANT EVENTS AND PEOPLE WHO CHANGE HISTORY.<br />

8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />

NONE<br />

9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />

EVERYONE HAD VERY POSITIVE THINGS TO SAY ABOUT HER VISIT.<br />

ARTIST: ANDREA ELAM<br />

CONTRACT #: A8707<br />

TITLE OF PROGRAM: BAILEMOS - SOUTH AMERICA FOLKLORIC DANCE<br />

TYPE OF PROGRAM: WORKSHOP<br />

DISTRICT/ SCHOOL:<br />

# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />

PEEKSKILL/HILLCREST ELEM.<br />

# OF STUDENTS: 9 GRADE(S) 4 & 5<br />

DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 4/16-6/8/12<br />

NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />

STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 X STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4 X<br />

ARTIST: ANDREA ELAM<br />

CONTRACT #: A7924<br />

TITLE OF PROGRAM: SINGING - GLEE KIDS<br />

TYPE OF PROGRAM: WORKSHOP<br />

DISTRICT/ SCHOOL: CHAPPAQUA/WESTORCHARD ELEM.<br />

# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />

# OF STUDENTS: 11 GRADE(S) 1-3<br />

DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 1/11-2/29/12<br />

NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />

STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />

1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />

1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />

1.<br />

2.<br />

3.<br />

4.<br />

5.<br />

6.<br />

STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />

ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />

EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />

ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />

TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />

QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

N/<br />

7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />

TEACHING THIS DANCE TO STUDENTS REGARDLESS TO THEIR<br />

ETHNICITY IS BENEFICIAL. IT OPENS THEM TO OTHER CULTURES,<br />

CREATES ARTISTIC APPRECIATION AND INCREASES KNOWLEDGE<br />

AND SENSITIVITY.<br />

8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />

NONE<br />

9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />

SHE IS A WONDERFUL TEACHING ARTIST WHO CLEARLY ENJOYS<br />

HER ART AND SHARING IT WITH STUDENTS.<br />

1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />

2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />

3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />

4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />

5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />

6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />

7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />

NONE<br />

8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />

NONE<br />

9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />

NONE<br />

4<br />

4<br />

4<br />

4<br />

4<br />

N/<br />

Arts in Education Service - School Evaluations <strong>2011</strong>-<strong>2012</strong><br />

Page 12 of 332


ARTIST: ANDREA HOMER-MacDONALD<br />

CONTRACT #: A7591<br />

TITLE OF PROGRAM: DANCE RESIDENCY<br />

TYPE OF PROGRAM: RESIDENCY<br />

DISTRICT/ SCHOOL:<br />

# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />

PELHAM/COLONIAL ELEM.<br />

# OF STUDENTS: 60 GRADE(S) 2<br />

DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 9/20-10/28/11<br />

NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />

STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 X STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4 X<br />

ARTIST: ANDREW GMOSER dba SILENT G PROD CONTRACT #: A8027<br />

TITLE OF PROGRAM: LIGHTING DESIGNER FOR JAZZ CO.<br />

TYPE OF PROGRAM: RESIDENCY<br />

DISTRICT/ SCHOOL: TUCKAHOE/TUCKAHOE HIGH SCHOOL<br />

# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />

# OF STUDENTS: 60 GRADE(S) 9-12<br />

DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 2/28-3/3/12<br />

NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />

STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 X STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />

1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />

1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />

1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />

2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />

3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />

4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />

5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />

6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />

7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />

ANDREA IS ENTHUSIASTIC AND GENUINE IN HER TEACHING AND<br />

PASSIONATE ABOUT DANCE. SHE MIRRORS OUR CURRICULUM OF<br />

MOVEMENT EDUCATION SO NICELY AND ALSO INCORPORATES<br />

MATERIALS THE STUDENTS LEARN IN THE CLASSROOM.<br />

8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />

HAVE A COPY OF THE MUSIC JUST IN CASE WE HAVE A<br />

MALFUNCTION ON MY IPAD OR COMPUTER OR CD.<br />

9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />

ANDREA HAS EXCELLENT CLASSROOM MANAGEMENT SKILLS AND<br />

DOES AN EXCELLENT JOB COMMUNICATING THE RESPECT<br />

NEEDED IN THE DANCE FIELD. I OFTEN CONTINUE USING HER<br />

STRATEGIES LONG AFTER SHE COMPLETES HER RESIDENCY AND<br />

ALSO USE THEM WITH OTHER CLASSES.<br />

ARTIST: ANDREW GMOSER dba SILENT G PROD CONTRACT #: A8179<br />

TITLE OF PROGRAM: LIGHTING DESIGNER FOR THE SHOW - ANNIE GET<br />

YOUR GUN<br />

TYPE OF PROGRAM: RESIDENCY<br />

DISTRICT/ SCHOOL:<br />

TUCKAHOE/TUCKAHOE MS & HS<br />

# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />

# OF STUDENTS: GRADE(S) 6-12<br />

DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE<br />

3/16-21/12<br />

NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />

STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 X STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />

1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

4<br />

1.<br />

2.<br />

3.<br />

4.<br />

5.<br />

6.<br />

STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />

ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />

EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />

ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />

TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />

QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />

DANCE IS EDUCATIONAL, CULTURAL, ACTIVE AND THE STUDENTS<br />

GENUINELY ENJOYED IT AND WERE COMMITTED TO THE PROGRAM.<br />

8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />

NONE<br />

9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />

ARTIST:<br />

NONE<br />

ANDREW KEATING<br />

TITLE OF PROGRAM: VISUAL ARTIST VISIT<br />

TYPE OF PROGRAM: ASSEMBLY<br />

DISTRICT/ SCHOOL:<br />

NEW ROCHELLE/NEW ROCHELLE HS<br />

CONTRACT #: A8317<br />

# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />

# OF STUDENTS: 50 GRADE(S) 11 & 12<br />

DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE<br />

2/28/12<br />

NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />

STANDARD 1 STANDARD 2 STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />

1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />

1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />

2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />

3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />

4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />

5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />

6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />

7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />

EXCELLENT PRODUCTION.<br />

8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />

NONE<br />

9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />

NONE<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />

2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />

3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />

4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />

5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />

6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />

7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />

VISITING ARTISTS ARE A GREAT INFLUENCE TO ALL OUR<br />

STUDENTS.<br />

8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />

NONE<br />

9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />

NONE<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

4<br />

5<br />

Arts in Education Service - School Evaluations <strong>2011</strong>-<strong>2012</strong><br />

Page 13 of 332


ARTIST: ANGELA PERSAUD-ALLY<br />

CONTRACT #: A8183<br />

TITLE OF PROGRAM: BOOKS COME ALIVE WITH ART<br />

TYPE OF PROGRAM: WORKSHOP<br />

DISTRICT/ SCHOOL:<br />

# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />

PELHAM/HUTCHINSON ELEM.<br />

# OF STUDENTS: GRADE(S) 3<br />

DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 1/10-4/5/12<br />

NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />

STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 X STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />

ARTIST: ANGELA REID<br />

CONTRACT #: A7518<br />

TITLE OF PROGRAM: DANCE RESIDENCY<br />

TYPE OF PROGRAM: RESIDENCY<br />

DISTRICT/ SCHOOL: GREENBURGH #7/WOODLANDS MS/HS<br />

# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />

# OF STUDENTS: 10 GRADE(S) 7-12<br />

DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE OCT., <strong>2011</strong>-MAY, <strong>2012</strong><br />

NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />

STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 X STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4 X<br />

1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />

1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />

1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />

2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />

3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />

4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />

5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />

6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />

5<br />

4<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />

2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />

3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />

4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />

5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />

6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM?<br />

EXCELLENT<br />

Y<br />

WHY?<br />

7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM?<br />

EXCELLENT TEACHER.<br />

Y<br />

WHY?<br />

8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />

NONE<br />

9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />

NONE<br />

8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />

NONE<br />

9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />

NONE<br />

ARTIST: ANNA RIEHL<br />

CONTRACT #: A7966<br />

TITLE OF PROGRAM: ART & CULTURE OF YOGA<br />

TYPE OF PROGRAM: WORKSHOP<br />

DISTRICT/ SCHOOL:<br />

# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />

PELHAM/COLONIAL ELEM.<br />

# OF STUDENTS: 12 GRADE(S) K-2<br />

DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 12/1/11-2/16/12<br />

NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />

STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 X STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4 X<br />

ARTIST: ANNE FRETZ-IVERSEN<br />

CONTRACT #: A7926B<br />

TITLE OF PROGRAM: ARTS & CRAFTS<br />

TYPE OF PROGRAM: WORKSHOP<br />

DISTRICT/ SCHOOL: CHAPPAQUA/WESTORCHARD ELEM.<br />

# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />

# OF STUDENTS: 8 GRADE(S) K & 1<br />

DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 1/13-3/9/12<br />

NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />

STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 X STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />

1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />

1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />

1.<br />

2.<br />

3.<br />

4.<br />

5.<br />

6.<br />

STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />

ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />

EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />

ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />

TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />

QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

N/<br />

N/<br />

7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />

ANNA WAS VERY DEDICATED AND KEPT THE CHILDREN<br />

ENTHUSIASTIC AND MOTIVATED. SHE TAUGHT THE CHILDREN HOW<br />

TO MOVE THEIR BODY USING BASIC YOGA POSES THROUGH<br />

EXERCISE AND SONG. THE CHILDREN WERE WELL BEHAVED.<br />

8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />

NONE<br />

9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />

NONE<br />

1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />

2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />

3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />

4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />

5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />

6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />

7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />

WONDERFUL. THE STUDENTS LOVED HER AND LEARNED A LOT.<br />

8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />

NONE<br />

9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />

NONE<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

Arts in Education Service - School Evaluations <strong>2011</strong>-<strong>2012</strong><br />

Page 14 of 332


ARTIST: ANNE FRETZ-IVERSEN<br />

CONTRACT #: A8203<br />

TITLE OF PROGRAM: FRENCH CULTURE & LANGUAGE<br />

TYPE OF PROGRAM: WORKSHOP<br />

DISTRICT/ SCHOOL: CHAPPAQUA/ROARING BROOK ELEM.<br />

# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />

# OF STUDENTS: GRADE(S) K-2<br />

DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 1/11-2/29/12<br />

NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />

STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 X STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4 X<br />

ARTIST: ANNE FRETZ-IVERSEN<br />

CONTRACT #: A7926A<br />

TITLE OF PROGRAM: FRENCH CULTURE & LANGUAGE<br />

TYPE OF PROGRAM: WORKSHOP<br />

DISTRICT/ SCHOOL: CHAPPAQUA/WESTORCHARD ELEM.<br />

# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />

# OF STUDENTS: 8 GRADE(S) K-4<br />

DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 1/12-3/8/12<br />

NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />

STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 X STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4 X<br />

1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />

1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />

1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />

2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />

3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />

4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />

5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />

6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />

7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />

ANNE IS AN ENGAGING INSTRUCTOR.<br />

8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />

NONE<br />

9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />

NONE<br />

4<br />

4<br />

4<br />

4<br />

3<br />

4<br />

1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />

2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />

3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />

4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />

5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />

6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />

7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />

WONDERFUL. THE STUDENTS LOVED HER AND LEARNED A LOT.<br />

8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />

NONE<br />

9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />

NONE<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

ARTIST: ANNE MARIE GALLER<br />

CONTRACT #: A8307<br />

TITLE OF PROGRAM: CHOREOGRAPHER FOR THE SHOW - GUYS & DOLLS<br />

TYPE OF PROGRAM: RESIDENCY<br />

DISTRICT/ SCHOOL: KATONAH/LEWISBORO/JOHN JAY HIGH SCHOOL<br />

# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />

# OF STUDENTS: 50 GRADE(S) 9-12<br />

DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 2/1-3/22/12<br />

NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />

STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 X STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4 X<br />

ARTIST: ANTHONY TRAINA<br />

CONTRACT #: A8041B<br />

TITLE OF PROGRAM: DRUMMER FOR CHORUS SPRING CONCERT<br />

TYPE OF PROGRAM: ASSEMBLY<br />

DISTRICT/ SCHOOL: KATONAH/LEWISBORO/JOHN JAY MIDDLE SCHOOL<br />

# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />

# OF STUDENTS: 350 GRADE(S) 6-8<br />

DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 6/5/12<br />

NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />

STANDARD 1 STANDARD 2 STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />

1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />

1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />

1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />

2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />

3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />

4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />

5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />

6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />

2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />

3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />

4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />

5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />

6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM?<br />

NONE<br />

Y<br />

WHY?<br />

7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM?<br />

NONE<br />

Y<br />

WHY?<br />

8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />

NONE<br />

9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />

NONE<br />

8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />

NONE<br />

9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />

NONE<br />

Arts in Education Service - School Evaluations <strong>2011</strong>-<strong>2012</strong><br />

Page 15 of 332


ARTIST: ANTHONY TRAINA<br />

CONTRACT #: A8041A<br />

TITLE OF PROGRAM: DRUMMER FOR CHORUS WINTER CONCERT<br />

TYPE OF PROGRAM: ASSEMBLY<br />

DISTRICT/ SCHOOL: KATONAH/LEWISBORO/JOHN JAY MIDDLE SCHOOL<br />

# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />

# OF STUDENTS: 350 GRADE(S) 6-8<br />

DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 12/1/11-1/25/12<br />

NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />

STANDARD 1 STANDARD 2 STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />

1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />

ARTIST: APPLEBY FOUNDATION INC., dba REBE CONTRACT #: A7561<br />

TITLE OF PROGRAM: MICHELLE WURT - KIDS CO MOTION DANCE &<br />

MOVEMENT<br />

TYPE OF PROGRAM: WORKSHOP<br />

DISTRICT/ SCHOOL: KATONAH/LEWISBORO/KATONAH ELEM. SCHOOL<br />

# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />

# OF STUDENTS: 7 GRADE(S) 3-5<br />

DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 10/6-12/1/11<br />

NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />

STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 X STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />

1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />

1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />

2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />

3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />

4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />

5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />

6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />

7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />

NONE<br />

8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />

NONE<br />

9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />

NONE<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

1.<br />

2.<br />

3.<br />

4.<br />

5.<br />

6.<br />

STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />

ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />

EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />

ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />

TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />

QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />

4<br />

4<br />

4<br />

4<br />

4<br />

4<br />

7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />

ORGANIZED AND WELL RUN. THE STUDENTS ENJOYED THE CLASS.<br />

8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />

NONE<br />

9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />

NONE<br />

ARTIST: APPLEBY FOUNDATION INC., dba REBE CONTRACT #: A8280<br />

TITLE OF PROGRAM: MICHELLE WURT - LET'S GET MOVING<br />

TYPE OF PROGRAM: WORKSHOP<br />

DISTRICT/ SCHOOL: KATONAH/LEWISBORO/KATONAH ELEM. SCHOOL<br />

# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />

# OF STUDENTS: 9 GRADE(S) K-2<br />

DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 1/17-3/13/12<br />

NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />

STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 X STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />

1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />

ARTIST: ARCOIRIS RECORDS, INC.<br />

CONTRACT #: A8482<br />

TITLE OF PROGRAM: JOSE LUIS OROZCO - LANGUAGE, HISTORY &<br />

CULTURE THRU MUSIC<br />

TYPE OF PROGRAM: ASSEMBLY<br />

DISTRICT/ SCHOOL: TARRYTOWN/JOHN PAULDING ELEM.<br />

# OF TEACHERS: 10 # OF STUDENTS: 600 GRADE(S) K-2<br />

DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 4/17/12<br />

NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />

STANDARD 1 STANDARD 2 STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4 X<br />

1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />

1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />

2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />

3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />

4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />

5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />

6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />

7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />

WELL LIKE, ORGANIZED AND A GOOD CLASS.<br />

8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />

NONE<br />

9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />

NONE<br />

4<br />

4<br />

4<br />

4<br />

4<br />

4<br />

1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />

2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />

3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />

4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />

5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />

6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />

7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />

NONE<br />

8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />

NONE<br />

9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />

JOSE IS A CONSUMATE PROFESSIONAL WHO STRIVES<br />

CONTINUOUSLY TO IMPROVE. WE TRULY ENJOY THIS GIFTED<br />

MUSICIAN PERFORMER WHO CAPTIVATED OVER 600 YOUNG<br />

CHILDREN WITH HIS PRESENCE.<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

Arts in Education Service - School Evaluations <strong>2011</strong>-<strong>2012</strong><br />

Page 16 of 332


ARTIST: ARM OF THE SEA PRODUCTIONS, INC. CONTRACT #: A8165<br />

TITLE OF PROGRAM: AT THE TURNING OF THE TIDE SHOW<br />

TYPE OF PROGRAM: ASSEMBLY<br />

DISTRICT/ SCHOOL: EASTCHESTER/ANNE HUTCHINSON ELEM.<br />

# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />

# OF STUDENTS: 22 GRADE(S) 4 & 5<br />

DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 1/4/12<br />

NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />

STANDARD 1 STANDARD 2 STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />

ARTIST: ARM OF THE SEA PRODUCTIONS, INC. CONTRACT #: A8165<br />

TITLE OF PROGRAM: AT THE TURNING OF THE TIDE SHOW<br />

TYPE OF PROGRAM: ASSEMBLY<br />

DISTRICT/ SCHOOL: EASTCHESTER/ANNE HUTCHINSON ELEM.<br />

# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />

# OF STUDENTS: GRADE(S) 4 & 5<br />

DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 1/4/12<br />

NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />

STANDARD 1 STANDARD 2 STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />

1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />

1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />

1.<br />

2.<br />

3.<br />

4.<br />

5.<br />

6.<br />

STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />

ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />

EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />

ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />

TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />

QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />

3<br />

4<br />

3<br />

4<br />

3<br />

N/<br />

7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? N WHY?<br />

I THOUGHT THAT THERE WERE MANY PARTS OF THIS PROGRAM<br />

THAT WERE INAPPROPRIATE FOR 4TH AND 5TH GRADERS. IT ALSO<br />

DOESN'T FOCUS ON THE INFORMATION WE TEACH ABOUT THE<br />

HUDSON RIVER.<br />

8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />

NONE<br />

9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />

NONE<br />

ARTIST: ARM OF THE SEA PRODUCTIONS, INC. CONTRACT #: A8165<br />

TITLE OF PROGRAM: AT THE TURNING OF THE TIDE SHOW<br />

TYPE OF PROGRAM: ASSEMBLY<br />

DISTRICT/ SCHOOL:<br />

EASTCHESTER/ANNE HUTCHINSON ELEM.<br />

# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />

# OF STUDENTS: 24 GRADE(S) 4 & 5<br />

DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE<br />

1/4/12<br />

NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />

STANDARD 1 STANDARD 2 STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />

1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />

2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />

3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />

4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />

5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />

6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />

7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />

BEAUTIFUL PROGRAM BUT MANY 4TH GRADERS DIDN'T<br />

UNDERSTAND IT.<br />

8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />

DO NOT SET STUDENTS TO THE LEFT OF STAGE. VIEW IS BLOCKED<br />

BY NARRATION.<br />

9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />

NONE<br />

ARTIST: ARM OF THE SEA PRODUCTIONS, INC. CONTRACT #: A8165<br />

TITLE OF PROGRAM: AT THE TURNING OF THE TIDE SHOW<br />

TYPE OF PROGRAM: ASSEMBLY<br />

DISTRICT/ SCHOOL:<br />

EASTCHESTER/ANNE HUTCHINSON ELEM.<br />

# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />

# OF STUDENTS: 24 GRADE(S) 4 & 5<br />

DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE<br />

1/4/12<br />

NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />

STANDARD 1 STANDARD 2 STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />

3<br />

5<br />

4<br />

5<br />

5<br />

N/<br />

1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />

1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />

1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />

2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />

3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />

4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />

5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />

6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />

7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? N WHY?<br />

THIS PROGRAM, THOUGH WELL INTENTIONED, DID NOT REACH<br />

STUDENTS EFFECTIVELY. STUDENTS WERE OFTEN CONFUSED BY<br />

WHAT THEY SAW AND DID NOT GAIN THE CONCEPTS INTENDED.<br />

8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />

THE TIMING OF THE PERFORMANCE SHOULD BE SHORTER. THE<br />

PERFORMANCE COULD BE MORE STREAMLINED SO CONTENT WAS<br />

EASILY UNDERSTOOD.<br />

9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />

THE ARTISTRY OF SCENERY AND COSTUMES WAS BEAUTIFUL.<br />

1<br />

2<br />

2<br />

3<br />

2<br />

N/<br />

1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />

2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />

3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />

4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />

5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />

6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />

7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />

ARTISTICALLY IT WAS GREAT. STUDENTS TOLD ME THEY DIDN'T<br />

UNDERSTAND STORY AS A PERFORMANCE, HOWEVER, THEY<br />

LOVED IT.<br />

8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />

THE CONTENT UNDERSTANDING REQUIRED LOTS OF<br />

BACKGROUND KNOWLEDGE. THIS CAN BE HELPED BY PROVIDING<br />

INFO ON HUDSON ESTUARY AHEAD OF TIME.<br />

9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />

NONE<br />

4<br />

5<br />

4<br />

5<br />

5<br />

N/<br />

Arts in Education Service - School Evaluations <strong>2011</strong>-<strong>2012</strong><br />

Page 17 of 332


ARTIST: ARM OF THE SEA PRODUCTIONS, INC. CONTRACT #: A8165<br />

TITLE OF PROGRAM: AT THE TURNING OF THE TIDE SHOW<br />

TYPE OF PROGRAM: ASSEMBLY<br />

DISTRICT/ SCHOOL: EASTCHESTER/ANNE HUTCHINSON ELEM.<br />

# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />

# OF STUDENTS: GRADE(S) 4 & 5<br />

DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 1/4/12<br />

NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />

STANDARD 1 STANDARD 2 STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />

ARTIST: ARM OF THE SEA PRODUCTIONS, INC. CONTRACT #: A8613<br />

TITLE OF PROGRAM: TURTLE ISLAND MEDICINE SHOW<br />

TYPE OF PROGRAM: ASSEMBLY<br />

DISTRICT/ SCHOOL:<br />

# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />

PELHAM/SIWANOY ELEM.<br />

# OF STUDENTS: 100 GRADE(S) 4 & 5<br />

DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 4/30/12<br />

NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />

STANDARD 1 STANDARD 2 STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4 X<br />

1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />

1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />

1.<br />

2.<br />

3.<br />

4.<br />

5.<br />

6.<br />

STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />

ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />

EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />

ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />

TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />

QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />

3<br />

2<br />

N/<br />

5<br />

5<br />

N/<br />

7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? N WHY?<br />

I FELT SOME OF THE MATERIAL A LITTLE INAPPROPRIATE AND IT<br />

WAS VERY CONFUSING TO MANY OF THE STUDENTS.<br />

8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />

NONE<br />

9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />

NONE<br />

1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />

2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />

3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />

4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />

5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />

6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />

7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />

THE VISUAL REPRESENTATION OF GLOBAL WARMING WAS<br />

OUTSTANDING. THE STORY AND MUSIC WERE ENGAGING. THE<br />

AUDIENCE WAS AWE-STRUCK.<br />

8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />

NONE<br />

9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />

THANK YOU. WE CAN'T WAIT TO HAVE YOU BACK AGAIN.<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

ARTIST: ARM OF THE SEA PRODUCTIONS, INC. CONTRACT #: A7563<br />

TITLE OF PROGRAM: TURTLE ISLAND MEDICINE SHOW<br />

TYPE OF PROGRAM: ASSEMBLY<br />

DISTRICT/ SCHOOL: EASTCHESTER/GREENVALE ELEM.<br />

# OF TEACHERS: 4<br />

# OF STUDENTS: 525 GRADE(S) 2-5<br />

DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 10/21/11<br />

NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />

STANDARD 1 STANDARD 2 STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4 X<br />

ARTIST: ARTS ARE ESSENTIAL, INC.<br />

CONTRACT #: A8788<br />

TITLE OF PROGRAM: TONY VACCA - WORLD PERCUSSION RHYTHMS<br />

TYPE OF PROGRAM: ASSEMBLY/WORKSHOP<br />

DISTRICT/ SCHOOL: NEW ROCHELLE/ALBERT LEONARD MIDDLE SCHOOL<br />

# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />

# OF STUDENTS: GRADE(S) 6-8<br />

DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 4/30-5/1/12<br />

NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />

STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 X STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4 X<br />

1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />

1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />

1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />

2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />

3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />

4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />

5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />

6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />

5<br />

4<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

4<br />

1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />

2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />

3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />

4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />

5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />

6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />

SCENERY AND PROPS WERE VERY COLORFUL, FUN AND<br />

ELABORATE. THE STORY WAS VERY EDUCATIONAL.<br />

8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />

ARTIST WAS LATE DUE TO TRAFFIC. BE ON TIME.<br />

9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />

2ND AND 3RD GRADES SEEMED NOT TO GRASP ALL OF THE<br />

CONCEPTS.<br />

7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM?<br />

THE PRESENTERS WERE EXCELLENT.<br />

8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />

NONE<br />

9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />

NONE<br />

Y<br />

WHY?<br />

Arts in Education Service - School Evaluations <strong>2011</strong>-<strong>2012</strong><br />

Page 18 of 332


ARTIST: ARTS HORIZONS, INC.<br />

CONTRACT #: A8168<br />

TITLE OF PROGRAM: AFRICAN HORIZONS<br />

TYPE OF PROGRAM: ASSEMBLY<br />

DISTRICT/ SCHOOL: HENDRICK HUDSON/BUCHANAN/VERPLANCK ELEM.<br />

# OF TEACHERS: 5<br />

# OF STUDENTS: 307 GRADE(S) K-5<br />

DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 5/14/12<br />

NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />

STANDARD 1 STANDARD 2 STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4 X<br />

ARTIST: ARTS HORIZONS, INC.<br />

CONTRACT #: A8377B<br />

TITLE OF PROGRAM: ELLIS ISLAND STORIES<br />

TYPE OF PROGRAM: ASSEMBLY<br />

DISTRICT/ SCHOOL: TARRYTOWN/WASHINGTON IRVING ELEM.<br />

# OF TEACHERS: 8<br />

# OF STUDENTS: 185 GRADE(S) 4<br />

DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 4/30/12<br />

NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />

STANDARD 1 STANDARD 2 STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4 X<br />

1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />

1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />

1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />

2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />

3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />

4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />

5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />

6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />

7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />

VERY ENERGETIC AND ENGAGING PROGRAM. AUDIENCE<br />

PARTICIPATION HELPED STUDENTS CONNECT TO THE MATERIALS.<br />

"DRUMTALK" WAS A GREAT WAY TO CONNECT INSTRUMENT<br />

NAMES.<br />

8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />

USE OF THE WORD 'SEXY' BOTHERED SOME TEACHERS. THE<br />

CREAMING PORTION USED TO HELP STUDENTS GET THEIR ENERGY<br />

OUT? WAS UPSETTING TO SOME.<br />

9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />

LONG LAG TIME BETWEEN INTRODUCTION BY SCHOOL AND<br />

PROGRAM START.<br />

ARTIST: ARTS HORIZONS, INC.<br />

TITLE OF PROGRAM: ELLIS ISLAND STORIES<br />

TYPE OF PROGRAM: ASSEMBLY<br />

DISTRICT/ SCHOOL:<br />

BYRAM HILLS/WAMPUS ELEM.<br />

CONTRACT #: A7876<br />

# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />

# OF STUDENTS: 220 GRADE(S) 4<br />

DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE<br />

6/5/12<br />

NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />

STANDARD 1 STANDARD 2 STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4 X<br />

4<br />

5<br />

4<br />

4<br />

5<br />

5<br />

1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />

2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />

3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />

4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />

5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />

6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />

7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />

THE ARTISTS WERE EXTREMELY PROFESIONAL AND DID A GREAT<br />

JOB CONNECTING THE STORIES TO THEIR PERSONAL<br />

EXPERIENCES.<br />

8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />

ALLOW TIME FOR A FEW MORE QUESTIONS AND STUDENTS<br />

PARTICIPATION.<br />

9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />

ARTIST:<br />

GREAT JOB. THE STUDENTS ENJOYED THE PERFORMANCE AND IT<br />

TIED INTO OUR CURRICULUM NICELY.<br />

ARTS HORIZONS, INC.<br />

TITLE OF PROGRAM: JOURNEYS WITH SOUND<br />

TYPE OF PROGRAM: ASSEMBLY<br />

DISTRICT/ SCHOOL:<br />

YORKTOWN/MOHANSIC ELEM.<br />

CONTRACT #: A8522<br />

# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />

# OF STUDENTS: GRADE(S) 3<br />

DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE<br />

5/18/12<br />

NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />

STANDARD 1 STANDARD 2 STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4 X<br />

4<br />

4<br />

3<br />

3<br />

4<br />

3<br />

1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />

1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />

1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />

2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />

3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />

4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />

5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />

6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />

2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />

3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />

4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />

5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />

6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM?<br />

NONE<br />

Y<br />

WHY?<br />

7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM?<br />

NONE<br />

Y<br />

WHY?<br />

8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />

NONE<br />

9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />

NONE<br />

8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />

NONE<br />

9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />

NONE<br />

Arts in Education Service - School Evaluations <strong>2011</strong>-<strong>2012</strong><br />

Page 19 of 332


ARTIST: ARTS HORIZONS, INC.<br />

CONTRACT #: A8273<br />

TITLE OF PROGRAM: MEET THE INSTRUMENTS<br />

TYPE OF PROGRAM: ASSEMBLY<br />

DISTRICT/ SCHOOL:<br />

# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />

CARMEL/KENT PRIMARY SCHOOL<br />

# OF STUDENTS: 472 GRADE(S) K-4<br />

DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 6/1/12<br />

NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />

STANDARD 1 STANDARD 2 STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4 X<br />

ARTIST: ARTS HORIZONS, INC.<br />

CONTRACT #: A8504<br />

TITLE OF PROGRAM: PATHWAYS TO DISCOVERY - TRACING OUR ROOTS<br />

TYPE OF PROGRAM: ASSEMBLY<br />

DISTRICT/ SCHOOL:<br />

# OF TEACHERS: 8<br />

OSSINING/CLAREMONT ELEM.<br />

# OF STUDENTS: 714 GRADE(S) 3 & 4<br />

DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 2/28/12<br />

NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />

STANDARD 1 STANDARD 2 STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4 X<br />

1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />

1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />

1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />

2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />

3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />

4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />

5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />

6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />

7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />

THEY ARE HIGHLY SKILLED MUSICIANS WHO CLEARLY ENJOY<br />

SHARING THEIR ART WITH CHILDREN.<br />

8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />

NONE<br />

9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />

NONE<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />

2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />

3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />

4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />

5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />

6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />

7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />

THE THEME WAS EXACTLY WHAT WE WERE LOOKING FOR. OUR<br />

CELEBRATION OF BLACK HISTORY MONTH.<br />

8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />

PERHAPS A FEW VISUALS DEPICTING THE DIFFERENT ERAS.<br />

9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />

EXCELLENT PROGRAM.<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

N/<br />

ARTIST: ARTS HORIZONS, INC.<br />

CONTRACT #: A8421<br />

TITLE OF PROGRAM: RAMZI EDLIBI 100 YEARS OF POPULAR DANCE<br />

TYPE OF PROGRAM: ASSEMBLY<br />

DISTRICT/ SCHOOL: TARRYTOWN/WASHINGTON IRVING ELEM.<br />

# OF TEACHERS: 9<br />

# OF STUDENTS: 388 GRADE(S) 4 & 5<br />

DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 5/7/12<br />

NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />

STANDARD 1 STANDARD 2 STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4 X<br />

ARTIST: ARTS HORIZONS, INC.<br />

CONTRACT #: A8377A<br />

TITLE OF PROGRAM: SUSAN GOODMAN JACKSON - STAND UP SPEAK OUT<br />

TYPE OF PROGRAM: ASSEMBLY<br />

DISTRICT/ SCHOOL: TARRYTOWN/WASHINGTON IRVING ELEM.<br />

# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />

# OF STUDENTS: 584 GRADE(S) 3-5<br />

DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 2/6/12<br />

NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />

STANDARD 1 STANDARD 2 STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4 X<br />

1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />

1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />

1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />

2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />

3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />

4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />

5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />

6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />

7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />

VERY ENGAGING AND FUN WITH STRONG EDUCATIONAL<br />

BACKGROUND INFORMATION.<br />

8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />

NONE<br />

9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />

THANK YOU. OUR STUDENTS AND STAFF ENJOYED THE PROGRAM.<br />

5<br />

4<br />

4<br />

5<br />

4<br />

3<br />

1.<br />

2.<br />

3.<br />

4.<br />

5.<br />

6.<br />

STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />

ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />

EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />

ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />

TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />

QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />

2<br />

2<br />

2<br />

2<br />

2<br />

2<br />

7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? N WHY?<br />

THE CONTENT OF HER LYRICS AND DISCUSSION WERE FROM TOO<br />

NEGATIVE A FRAME. IN ADDITION, SHE NEEDS TO DIFFERENTIATE<br />

BASED ON AUDIENCE.<br />

8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />

MORE UPTEMPO MUSICAL ARRANGEMENTS.<br />

9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />

SHE WAS CURTEOUS, PROFESSIONAL AND TALENTED.<br />

Arts in Education Service - School Evaluations <strong>2011</strong>-<strong>2012</strong><br />

Page 20 of 332


ARTIST: ARTS POWER, INC.<br />

CONTRACT #: A7986<br />

TITLE OF PROGRAM: FISH FACE - THE MUSICAL<br />

TYPE OF PROGRAM: ASSEMBLY<br />

DISTRICT/ SCHOOL:<br />

# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />

BRIARCLIFF/TODD ELEM.<br />

# OF STUDENTS: GRADE(S) 2<br />

DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 2/29/12<br />

NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />

STANDARD 1 STANDARD 2 STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />

ARTIST: ARTS POWER, INC.<br />

CONTRACT #: A8086<br />

TITLE OF PROGRAM: FOUR SCORE AND SEVEN YEARS AGO<br />

TYPE OF PROGRAM: ASSEMBLY<br />

DISTRICT/ SCHOOL: NEW ROCHELLE/WARD ELEM. SCHOOL<br />

# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />

# OF STUDENTS: 425 GRADE(S) 4 & 5<br />

DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 2/3/12<br />

NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />

STANDARD 1 STANDARD 2 STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />

1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />

1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />

1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />

2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />

3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />

4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />

5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />

6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

N/<br />

5<br />

N/<br />

1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />

2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />

3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />

4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />

5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />

6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM?<br />

NONE<br />

Y<br />

WHY?<br />

7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM?<br />

NONE<br />

Y<br />

WHY?<br />

8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />

Q & A SESSION.<br />

9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />

NONE<br />

8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />

NONE<br />

9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />

NONE<br />

ARTIST: ARTS POWER, INC.<br />

CONTRACT #: A8844<br />

TITLE OF PROGRAM: FROM THE MIXED UP FILES OF MRS. BASIL E.<br />

FRANKWEILER<br />

TYPE OF PROGRAM: ASSEMBLY<br />

DISTRICT/ SCHOOL: PLEASANTVILLE/PLEASANTVILLE MIDDLE SCHOOL<br />

# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />

# OF STUDENTS: GRADE(S) 5<br />

DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 5/3/12<br />

NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />

STANDARD 1 STANDARD 2 STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />

1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />

ARTIST: ARTS POWER, INC.<br />

CONTRACT #: A7562<br />

TITLE OF PROGRAM: LAURA INGALLS WILDER SHOW<br />

TYPE OF PROGRAM: ASSEMBLY<br />

DISTRICT/ SCHOOL: EASTCHESTER/GREENVALE ELEM.<br />

# OF TEACHERS: 5<br />

# OF STUDENTS: 238 GRADE(S) 4<br />

DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 11/9/11<br />

NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />

STANDARD 1 STANDARD 2 STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4 X<br />

1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />

1.<br />

2.<br />

3.<br />

4.<br />

5.<br />

6.<br />

STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />

ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />

EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />

ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />

TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />

QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />

WE LOVE ARTS POWER INC. THEY DO A WONDERFUL JOB ALWAYS.<br />

8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />

NONE<br />

9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />

THEY WERE EXCELLENT.<br />

1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />

2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />

3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />

4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />

5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />

6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />

7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />

EXCELLENT INTERPRETATION OF WEST IN THE 1800'S.<br />

8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />

NONE<br />

9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />

NONE<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

4<br />

Arts in Education Service - School Evaluations <strong>2011</strong>-<strong>2012</strong><br />

Page 21 of 332


ARTIST: ARTS POWER, INC.<br />

CONTRACT #: A7800<br />

TITLE OF PROGRAM: RAINBOW FISH SHOW<br />

TYPE OF PROGRAM: ASSEMBLY<br />

DISTRICT/ SCHOOL: EASTCHESTER/WAVERLY EARLY CHILDHOOD CTR<br />

# OF TEACHERS: 14 # OF STUDENTS: 240 GRADE(S) K<br />

DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 5/24/12<br />

NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />

STANDARD 1 STANDARD 2 STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />

ARTIST: ARTS WESTCHESTER<br />

CONTRACT #: A8827<br />

TITLE OF PROGRAM: PEDRO OSPINA - MURAL MAKING<br />

TYPE OF PROGRAM: RESIDENCY<br />

DISTRICT/ SCHOOL:<br />

# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />

OSSINING/ROOSEVELT<br />

# OF STUDENTS: 150 GRADE(S) 5<br />

DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 5/21-23/12<br />

NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />

STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 X STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4 X<br />

1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />

1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />

1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />

2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />

3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />

4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />

5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />

6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />

7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />

THE PLAY HAD VERY ATTRATIVE SCENERY, AND ENGAGING<br />

MUSICAL NUMBERS WHICH INCORPORATED DIFFERENT TYPES OF<br />

MUSIC FROM GOSPEL TO ROCKABILLY.<br />

8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />

THE PERFORMERS SPOKE VERY QUICKLY MAKING IT DIFFICULT TO<br />

UNDERSTAND THEM. MANY PEOPLE HAD DIFFICULTY HEARING<br />

DUE TO A FAULTY SPEAKER SYSTEM.<br />

9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />

THEY WERE VERY PROFESSIONAL AND PUNCTUAL. THEY USE<br />

VERY LITTLE BUT MANAGE TO PROVIDE A SUBSTANTIALLY VISUAL<br />

SHOW. COULD USE MORE AUDIENCE PARTICIPATION.<br />

4<br />

4<br />

2<br />

4<br />

2<br />

5<br />

1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />

2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />

3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />

4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />

5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />

6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />

7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />

THE METHODS AND PRODUCTS WERE EXCELLENT.<br />

8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />

NONE<br />

9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />

NONE<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

ARTIST: ASHLEY KAUFMAN<br />

CONTRACT #: A7859<br />

TITLE OF PROGRAM: JAZZ DANCING<br />

TYPE OF PROGRAM: WORKSHOP<br />

DISTRICT/ SCHOOL: EASTCHESTER/EASTCHESTER HIGH SCHOOL<br />

# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />

# OF STUDENTS: GRADE(S) 9-12<br />

DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 11/2/11-1/18/12<br />

NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />

STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 X STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4 X<br />

1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />

ARTIST: ASSOCIATED SOLO ARTISTS<br />

CONTRACT #: A8485<br />

TITLE OF PROGRAM: LEARNING ARTS MUSIC - MOVEMENT, NATURE & THE<br />

SEASONS<br />

TYPE OF PROGRAM: WORKSHOP<br />

DISTRICT/ SCHOOL: NEW ROCHELLE/COLUMBUS ELEM.<br />

# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />

# OF STUDENTS: 45 GRADE(S) 2<br />

DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 3/15/12<br />

NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />

STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 X STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />

1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />

1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />

2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />

3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />

4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />

5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />

6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />

7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />

NONE<br />

8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />

NONE<br />

9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />

ASHLEY BRINGS AN AMAZING ENERGY AND EXPERTISE TO THE<br />

PROGRAM.<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

55<br />

5<br />

5<br />

1.<br />

2.<br />

3.<br />

4.<br />

5.<br />

6.<br />

STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />

ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />

EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />

ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />

TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />

QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

N/<br />

7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />

THE PERFORMERS WERE HIGHLY ENERGETIC AND THE CHILDREN<br />

WERE ALL TOTALLY ENGAGED. THE PROGRAM COMBINED MUSIC<br />

WITH THEIR STUDY AND EXPOSED THEM TO PROFESSIONAL<br />

MUSICIANS AND A MUSICAL PERFORMANCE.<br />

8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />

NONE<br />

9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />

THE TEACHERS LOVED THIS PROGRAM AND HOPE WE CAN BRING<br />

IT BACK NEXT YEAR.<br />

Arts in Education Service - School Evaluations <strong>2011</strong>-<strong>2012</strong><br />

Page 22 of 332


ARTIST: ATL NY, INC.<br />

CONTRACT #: A7985<br />

TITLE OF PROGRAM: MIGUEL COSSIO - FIESTAS CELEBRATIONS IN<br />

MEXICO & LATIN AMERICA<br />

TYPE OF PROGRAM: WORKSHOP<br />

DISTRICT/ SCHOOL: KATONAH/LEWISBORO/KATONAH ELEM. SCHOOL<br />

# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />

# OF STUDENTS: 88 GRADE(S) 5<br />

DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 1/31/12<br />

NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />

STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 X STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4 X<br />

1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />

ARTIST: AXXANPRO23<br />

CONTRACT #: A8042B<br />

TITLE OF PROGRAM: JOHN SMITH - GUITARIST FOR THE SPRING CONCERT<br />

TYPE OF PROGRAM: ASSEMBLY<br />

DISTRICT/ SCHOOL: KATONAH/LEWISBORO/JOHN JAY MIDDLE SCHOOL<br />

# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />

# OF STUDENTS: 350 GRADE(S) 6-8<br />

DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 6/5/12<br />

NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />

STANDARD 1 STANDARD 2 STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />

1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />

1.<br />

2.<br />

3.<br />

4.<br />

5.<br />

6.<br />

STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />

ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />

EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />

ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />

TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />

QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

N/<br />

7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />

HE IS VERY KNOWLEDGEABLE. HE USES HIS PERSONAL<br />

EXPERIENCES AND BACKGROUND IN VISUAL ARTS TO MAKE THE<br />

PRESENTATION ENGAGING.<br />

8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />

NONE<br />

9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />

HE IS ALWAYS WELCOME.<br />

1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />

2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />

3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />

4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />

5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />

6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />

7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />

NONE<br />

8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />

NONE<br />

9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />

NONE<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

ARTIST: AXXANPRO23<br />

CONTRACT #: A8042A<br />

TITLE OF PROGRAM: JOHN SMITH - GUITARIST FOR THE WINTER CONCERT<br />

TYPE OF PROGRAM: RESIDENCY<br />

DISTRICT/ SCHOOL: KATONAH/LEWISBORO/JOHN JAY MIDDLE SCHOOL<br />

# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />

# OF STUDENTS: 350 GRADE(S) 6-8<br />

DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 12/1/11-1/25/12<br />

NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />

STANDARD 1 STANDARD 2 STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />

1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />

ARTIST: AZBAN, INC.<br />

CONTRACT #: A8088<br />

TITLE OF PROGRAM: JAMES BRUCHAC - NATIVE MONSTERS & ANIMAL<br />

STORIES<br />

TYPE OF PROGRAM: WORKSHOP<br />

DISTRICT/ SCHOOL: KATONAH/LEWISBORO/MEADOWPOND ELEM.<br />

# OF TEACHERS: 3<br />

# OF STUDENTS: 55` GRADE(S) 4<br />

DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 11/22/11<br />

NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />

STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 X STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4 X<br />

1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />

1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />

2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />

3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />

4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />

5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />

6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />

7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />

NONE<br />

8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />

NONE<br />

9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />

NONE<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />

2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />

3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />

4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />

5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />

6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />

7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />

NONE<br />

8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />

NONE<br />

9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />

NONE<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

Arts in Education Service - School Evaluations <strong>2011</strong>-<strong>2012</strong><br />

Page 23 of 332


ARTIST: BACKER ENTERTAINMENT, LLC CONTRACT #: A8866<br />

TITLE OF PROGRAM: SHAKE RATTLE 'N ROLL SHOW<br />

TYPE OF PROGRAM: ASSEMBLY<br />

DISTRICT/ SCHOOL:<br />

# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />

OSSINING/ROOSEVELT<br />

# OF STUDENTS: 305 GRADE(S) 5<br />

DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 6/19/12<br />

NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />

STANDARD 1 STANDARD 2 STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4 X<br />

ARTIST: BALI DALI PRODUCTIONS, INC.<br />

CONTRACT #: A8196A<br />

TITLE OF PROGRAM: ROBBI KUMALO - JAZZ ME SOME HISTORY, BABY<br />

TYPE OF PROGRAM: ASSEMBLY<br />

DISTRICT/ SCHOOL: CHAPPAQUA/BELL MIDDLE SCHOOL<br />

# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />

# OF STUDENTS: 190 GRADE(S) 6<br />

DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 1/6/12<br />

NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />

STANDARD 1 STANDARD 2 STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4 X<br />

1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />

1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />

1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />

2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />

3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />

4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />

5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />

6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />

2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />

3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />

4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />

5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />

6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

N/<br />

N/<br />

7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM?<br />

NONE<br />

Y<br />

WHY?<br />

7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM?<br />

VERY SOLID PROGRAM.<br />

Y<br />

WHY?<br />

8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />

NONE<br />

9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />

NONE<br />

8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />

NONE<br />

9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />

NONE<br />

ARTIST: BALI DALI PRODUCTIONS, INC.<br />

CONTRACT #: A8196B<br />

TITLE OF PROGRAM: ROBBI KUMALO - JAZZ ME SOME HISTORY, BABY<br />

TYPE OF PROGRAM: ASSEMBLY<br />

DISTRICT/ SCHOOL: CHAPPAQUA/SEVEN BRIDGES MIDDLE SCHOOL<br />

# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />

# OF STUDENTS: 175 GRADE(S) 6<br />

DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 1/6/12<br />

NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />

STANDARD 1 STANDARD 2 STANDARD 3 STANDARD 4 X<br />

ARTIST: BALLET AMBASSADORS<br />

CONTRACT #: A8570<br />

TITLE OF PROGRAM: SWAN LAKE BALLET<br />

TYPE OF PROGRAM: ASSEMBLY<br />

DISTRICT/ SCHOOL: DOBBS FERRY/SPRINGHURST ELEM.<br />

# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />

# OF STUDENTS: GRADE(S) K<br />

DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 3/7/12<br />

NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />

STANDARD 1 STANDARD 2 STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />

1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />

1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />

1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />

2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />

3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />

4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />

5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />

6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />

4<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

N/<br />

1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />

2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />

3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />

4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />

5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />

6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />

THERE WERE LOTS OF GOOD LESSONS AND POSITIVE STUDENT<br />

INTERACTION.<br />

8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />

NONE<br />

9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />

THANKS FOR INCLUDING OUR TEACHERS AND CURRICULUM.<br />

7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM?<br />

VERY AGE APPROPRIATE. WE ALL LOVED IT.<br />

8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />

WE THINK THE PROGRAM WAS PERFECT.<br />

9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />

A WONDERFUL DAY AND GREAT EXPERIENCE.<br />

Y<br />

WHY?<br />

Arts in Education Service - School Evaluations <strong>2011</strong>-<strong>2012</strong><br />

Page 24 of 332


ARTIST: BALLET ARTS<br />

CONTRACT #: A7961B<br />

TITLE OF PROGRAM: CHRISTINA MONITTO - CHEERLEADING<br />

TYPE OF PROGRAM: WORKSHOP<br />

DISTRICT/ SCHOOL:<br />

# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />

PELHAM/COLONIAL ELEM.<br />

# OF STUDENTS: 15 GRADE(S) K-2<br />

DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 11/30/11-2/15/12<br />

NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />

STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 X STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />

ARTIST: BALLET ARTS<br />

CONTRACT #: A8050B<br />

TITLE OF PROGRAM: FIONA DEVEAUX - IRISH STEP DANCE<br />

TYPE OF PROGRAM: WORKSHOP<br />

DISTRICT/ SCHOOL:<br />

# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />

PELHAM/PROSPECT HILL ELEM.<br />

# OF STUDENTS: 9 GRADE(S) K-2<br />

DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 1/10-3/6/12<br />

NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />

STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4 X<br />

1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />

1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />

1.<br />

2.<br />

3.<br />

4.<br />

5.<br />

6.<br />

STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />

ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />

EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />

ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />

TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />

QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

N/<br />

N/<br />

7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />

THE CHILDREN LEARNED HOW TO CHOREOGRAPH DANCES,<br />

DEVELOPED TECHNICAL SKILLS AND MOTIONS WHILE LEARNING<br />

CHEERS & CHANTS. THEY ALL HAD A WONDERFUL TIME.<br />

8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />

NONE<br />

9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />

NONE<br />

1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />

2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />

3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />

4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />

5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />

6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />

7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />

NONE<br />

8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />

NONE<br />

9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />

NONE<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

N/<br />

ARTIST: BALLET ARTS<br />

CONTRACT #: A7961A<br />

TITLE OF PROGRAM: LIA DANIELLE - MUSICAL THEATRE<br />

TYPE OF PROGRAM: WORKSHOP<br />

DISTRICT/ SCHOOL:<br />

# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />

PELHAM/COLONIAL ELEM.<br />

# OF STUDENTS: 16 GRADE(S) 3-5<br />

DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 11/28/11-2/13/12<br />

NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />

STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 X STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />

ARTIST: BALLET ARTS<br />

CONTRACT #: A8211A<br />

TITLE OF PROGRAM: SELENA COBURN - A CREATIVE MOVEMENT<br />

TYPE OF PROGRAM: WORKSHOP<br />

DISTRICT/ SCHOOL: CHAPPAQUA/ROARING BROOK ELEM.<br />

# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />

# OF STUDENTS: 9 GRADE(S) K-2<br />

DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 1/9-3/5/12<br />

NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />

STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />

1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />

1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />

1.<br />

2.<br />

3.<br />

4.<br />

5.<br />

6.<br />

STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />

ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />

EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />

ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />

TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />

QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

N/<br />

N/<br />

7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />

THE CHILDREN LOVED THIS CLASS. THEY LEARNED TO PERFORM,<br />

SING, DANCE, CHOREOGRAPH AND SCENE STUDY. BOTH THE<br />

ARTIST AND THE STUDENTS HAD A WONDERFUL EXPERIENCE.<br />

8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />

NONE<br />

9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />

NONE<br />

1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />

2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />

3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />

4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />

5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />

6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />

7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />

SELENA IS A WONDERFUL INSTRUCTOR.<br />

8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />

NONE<br />

9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />

SELENA WAS EXCEPTIONAL WITH THE SPECIAL NEEDS STUDENTS.<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

4<br />

N/<br />

Arts in Education Service - School Evaluations <strong>2011</strong>-<strong>2012</strong><br />

Page 25 of 332


ARTIST: BALLET ARTS<br />

CONTRACT #: A8050D<br />

TITLE OF PROGRAM: SELENA COBURN - ART & CULTURE OF YOGA<br />

TYPE OF PROGRAM: WORKSHOP<br />

DISTRICT/ SCHOOL:<br />

# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />

PELHAM/PROSPECT HILL ELEM.<br />

# OF STUDENTS: 10 GRADE(S) K-2<br />

DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 1/13-3/9/12<br />

NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />

STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4 X<br />

ARTIST: BALLET ARTS<br />

CONTRACT #: A8211C<br />

TITLE OF PROGRAM: SELENA COBURN - BALLET<br />

TYPE OF PROGRAM: WORKSHOP<br />

DISTRICT/ SCHOOL: CHAPPAQUA/ROARING BROOK ELEM.<br />

# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />

# OF STUDENTS: 9 GRADE(S) K-2<br />

DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 1/13-3/9/12<br />

NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />

STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />

1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />

1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />

1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />

2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />

3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />

4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />

5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />

6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

N/<br />

1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />

2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />

3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />

4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />

5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />

6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />

5<br />

5<br />

4<br />

5<br />

4<br />

N/<br />

7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM?<br />

NONE<br />

Y<br />

WHY?<br />

7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM?<br />

SALENA WAS VERY TALENTED AND PATIENT.<br />

Y<br />

WHY?<br />

8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />

NONE<br />

9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />

NONE<br />

8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />

NONE<br />

9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />

NONE<br />

ARTIST: BALLET ARTS<br />

CONTRACT #: A8211B<br />

TITLE OF PROGRAM: SELENA COBURN - HIP HOP<br />

TYPE OF PROGRAM: WORKSHOP<br />

DISTRICT/ SCHOOL: CHAPPAQUA/ROARING BROOK ELEM.<br />

# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />

# OF STUDENTS: 8 GRADE(S) 3 & 4<br />

DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 1/11-2/29/12<br />

NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />

STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4 X<br />

ARTIST: BALLET ARTS<br />

CONTRACT #: A8859<br />

TITLE OF PROGRAM: SHAREN DANIELLE - SELF ESTEEM THRU DANCE<br />

TYPE OF PROGRAM: WORKSHOP<br />

DISTRICT/ SCHOOL: WHITE PLAINS/MAMARONECK AVENUE ELEM. ELEM.<br />

# OF TEACHERS: 5<br />

# OF STUDENTS: 110 GRADE(S) K<br />

DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 5/24/12<br />

NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />

STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />

1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />

1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />

1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />

2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />

3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />

4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />

5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />

6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />

7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />

SELENA WAS VERY INTERESTED IN WORKING WITH STUDENTS.<br />

8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />

NONE<br />

9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />

NONE<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

N<br />

1.<br />

2.<br />

3.<br />

4.<br />

5.<br />

6.<br />

STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />

ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />

EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />

ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />

TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />

QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />

THIS WAS SUCH A GREAT WAY FOR THE STUDENTS TO EXPRESS<br />

THEMSELVES THROUGH DANCE MOVEMENT. THEY ENJOYED IT<br />

VERY MUCH.<br />

8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />

NONE<br />

9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />

THE INSTRUCTORS WERE SO ANIMATED AND CHILD FRIENDLY.<br />

THE CHILDREN LOVED THEM.<br />

Arts in Education Service - School Evaluations <strong>2011</strong>-<strong>2012</strong><br />

Page 26 of 332


ARTIST: BALLET HISPANICO OF NEW YORK CONTRACT #: A8775<br />

TITLE OF PROGRAM: PERFORMANCE FOR YOUNG PEOPLE<br />

TYPE OF PROGRAM: WORKSHOP<br />

DISTRICT/ SCHOOL:<br />

# OF TEACHERS: 2<br />

PELHAM/COLONIAL ELEM.<br />

# OF STUDENTS: 60 GRADE(S) 3 & 4<br />

DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 5/21-24/12<br />

NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />

STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4 X<br />

ARTIST: BARBARA BORKIN<br />

CONTRACT #: A7659A<br />

TITLE OF PROGRAM: EGYPTOLOGY STORIES, CRAFTS & CULTURE<br />

TYPE OF PROGRAM: WORKSHOP<br />

DISTRICT/ SCHOOL: EASTCHESTER/GREENVALE ELEM.<br />

# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />

# OF STUDENTS: 12 GRADE(S) 2-5<br />

DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 10/17-12/12/11<br />

NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />

STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 X STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4 X<br />

1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />

1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />

1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />

2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />

3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />

4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />

5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />

6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />

2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />

3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />

4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />

5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />

6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

N/<br />

7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />

GOOD EXPLANATION OF THE CULTURE OF EACH DANCE.<br />

7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM?<br />

NONE<br />

Y<br />

WHY?<br />

8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />

NONE<br />

9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />

WELL DONE.<br />

8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />

NONE<br />

9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />

NONE<br />

ARTIST: BARBARA BORKIN<br />

CONTRACT #: A8604<br />

TITLE OF PROGRAM: IT'S GREEK TO ME - STORIES, CRAFTS & ARTIFACTS<br />

TYPE OF PROGRAM: WORKSHOP<br />

DISTRICT/ SCHOOL: EASTCHESTER/GREENVALE ELEM.<br />

# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />

# OF STUDENTS: 14 GRADE(S) 2 & 3<br />

DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 3/14-5/9/12<br />

NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />

STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 X STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4 X<br />

ARTIST: BARBARA BORKIN<br />

CONTRACT #: A7659B<br />

TITLE OF PROGRAM: MEDIEVAL TIMES - STORIES, CRAFTS & ARTIFACTS<br />

TYPE OF PROGRAM: WORKSHOP<br />

DISTRICT/ SCHOOL: EASTCHESTER/GREENVALE ELEM.<br />

# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />

# OF STUDENTS: 12 GRADE(S) 4 & 5<br />

DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 10/18-12/13/11<br />

NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />

STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 X STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4 X<br />

1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />

1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />

1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />

2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />

3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />

4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />

5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />

6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

N/<br />

1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />

2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />

3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />

4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />

5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />

6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

N/<br />

7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y<br />

ANOTHER GREAT CREATIVE CLASS ABOUT HISTORY.<br />

WHY?<br />

7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM?<br />

NONE<br />

Y<br />

WHY?<br />

8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />

NONE<br />

9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />

NONE<br />

8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />

NONE<br />

9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />

NONE<br />

Arts in Education Service - School Evaluations <strong>2011</strong>-<strong>2012</strong><br />

Page 27 of 332


ARTIST: BARBARA BORKIN<br />

CONTRACT #: A7708<br />

TITLE OF PROGRAM: TOY STORY CRAFTS<br />

TYPE OF PROGRAM: WORKSHOP<br />

DISTRICT/ SCHOOL: EASTCHESTER/GREENVALE ELEM.<br />

# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />

# OF STUDENTS: 14 GRADE(S) 3-5<br />

DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 10/19-12/21/11<br />

NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />

STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 X STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />

ARTIST: BARBARA GARRIEL<br />

CONTRACT #: A8174<br />

TITLE OF PROGRAM: AUTHOR VISIT - WRITE AWAY<br />

TYPE OF PROGRAM: ASSEMBLY<br />

DISTRICT/ SCHOOL: LAKELAND/GEORGE WASHINGTON ELEM.<br />

# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />

# OF STUDENTS: GRADE(S) 5<br />

DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 1/25/12<br />

NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />

STANDARD 1 STANDARD 2 STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />

1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />

1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />

1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />

2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />

3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />

4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />

5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />

6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />

7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />

NONE<br />

8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />

NONE<br />

9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />

NONE<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

1.<br />

2.<br />

3.<br />

4.<br />

5.<br />

6.<br />

STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />

ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />

EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />

ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />

TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />

QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />

BARBARA DOES SUCH A GREAT JOB MAKING HER PRESENTATION<br />

INTERACTIVE AND ENGAGING. MY STUDENTS WERE ENTHUSIASTIC<br />

TO WRITE AFTER HER PRESENTATION.<br />

8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />

NONE<br />

9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />

GREAT JOB BARBARA.<br />

ARTIST: BARBARA SEGAL<br />

CONTRACT #: A8076<br />

TITLE OF PROGRAM: STONE CARVING<br />

TYPE OF PROGRAM: WORKSHOP<br />

DISTRICT/ SCHOOL:<br />

# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />

ARDSLEY/ARDSLEY HIGH SCHOOL<br />

# OF STUDENTS: GRADE(S) 10-12<br />

DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 11/21/11<br />

NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />

STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 X STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />

ARTIST: BARRY F. CORN<br />

CONTRACT #: A7501<br />

TITLE OF PROGRAM: SPANISH ART, CULTURE & LANGUAGE<br />

TYPE OF PROGRAM: WORKSHOP<br />

DISTRICT/ SCHOOL: KATONAH/LEWISBORO/INCREASE MILLER ELEM.<br />

# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />

# OF STUDENTS: 10 GRADE(S) 4 & 5<br />

DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 9/29-11/3/11<br />

NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />

STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 X STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4 X<br />

1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />

1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />

1.<br />

2.<br />

3.<br />

4.<br />

5.<br />

6.<br />

STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />

ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />

EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />

ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />

TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />

QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />

BARBARA IS AN EXCEPTIONAL SCULPTOR WHO WORKS WITH AN<br />

UNCOMMON MEDIUM, STONE. HER WEALTH OF EXPERIENCE WITH<br />

THIS MEDIUM ENABLES HER TO GUIDE STUDENTS THROUGH THE<br />

PROCESS WITH EASE.<br />

8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />

NONE. SHE IS TRULY INSPIRATIONAL.<br />

9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />

SHE IS WARM AND FRIENDLY AND HER ARTWORK WAS<br />

1.<br />

2.<br />

3.<br />

4.<br />

5.<br />

6.<br />

STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />

ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />

EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />

ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />

TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />

QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />

BARRY HAS BEEN TEACHING ADULTS FOR YEARS. HIS GREAT<br />

HUMOR AND ENGAGING TEACHING STYLE MAKES HIM A FABULOUS<br />

TEACHER.<br />

8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />

NONE<br />

9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />

FEEDBACK FROM PARENTS HAS BEEN QUITE POSITIVE.<br />

Arts in Education Service - School Evaluations <strong>2011</strong>-<strong>2012</strong><br />

Page 28 of 332


ARTIST: BARRY F. CORN<br />

CONTRACT #: A7965<br />

TITLE OF PROGRAM: SPANISH ART, CULTURE & LANGUAGE<br />

TYPE OF PROGRAM: WORKSHOP<br />

DISTRICT/ SCHOOL: KATONAH/LEWISBORO/INCREASE MILLER ELEM.<br />

# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />

# OF STUDENTS: 50 GRADE(S) 4 & 5<br />

DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE NOV., <strong>2011</strong>-JUNE, <strong>2012</strong><br />

NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />

STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 X STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4 X<br />

1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />

ARTIST: BASH THE TRASH ENVIRONMENTAL AR CONTRACT #: A8865<br />

TITLE OF PROGRAM: ENVIRONMENTAL ORCHESTRA & STORYTELLING<br />

SOUND SHOW<br />

TYPE OF PROGRAM: ASSEMBLY<br />

DISTRICT/ SCHOOL:<br />

# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />

OSSINING/BROOKSIDE ELEM.<br />

# OF STUDENTS: 710 GRADE(S) 2 & 3<br />

DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 6/18/12<br />

NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />

STANDARD 1 STANDARD 2 STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />

1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />

1.<br />

2.<br />

3.<br />

4.<br />

5.<br />

6.<br />

STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />

ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />

EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />

ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />

TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />

QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />

BARRY HAS BEEN TEACHING ADULTS FOR YEARS. HIS GREAT<br />

HUMOR AND ENGAGING TEACHING STYLE MAKES HIM A FABULOUS<br />

TEACHER FOR CHILDREN. HE HAS A RICH KNOWLEDGE OF THE<br />

TOPICS HE COVERS. HE IS WONDERFUL WITH THE STUDENTS. HE<br />

IS ENTERTAINING AND KEEPS THE STUDENTS FOCUSED.<br />

8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />

NONE<br />

9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />

FEEDBACK FROM PARENTS HAS BEEN QUITE POSITIVE. WE<br />

WOULD RECOMMEND BARRY TO OTHER SCHOOLS.<br />

1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />

2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />

3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />

4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />

5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />

6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />

7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />

NONE<br />

8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />

NONE<br />

9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />

NONE<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

ARTIST: BASH THE TRASH ENVIRONMENTAL AR CONTRACT #: A7875<br />

TITLE OF PROGRAM: ENVIRONMENTAL ORCHESTRA & STORYTELLING<br />

SOUND SHOW<br />

TYPE OF PROGRAM: ASSEMBLY<br />

DISTRICT/ SCHOOL:<br />

# OF TEACHERS: 5<br />

BYRAM HILLS/WAMPUS ELEM.<br />

# OF STUDENTS: 200 GRADE(S) 3<br />

DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 5/1/12<br />

NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />

STANDARD 1 STANDARD 2 STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />

ARTIST: BASH THE TRASH ENVIRONMENTAL AR CONTRACT #: A8565<br />

TITLE OF PROGRAM: ENVIRONMENTAL ORCHESTRA & STORYTELLING<br />

SOUND SHOW<br />

TYPE OF PROGRAM: ASSEMBLY<br />

DISTRICT/ SCHOOL:<br />

# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />

YORKTOWN/CROMPOND ELEM.<br />

# OF STUDENTS: 575 GRADE(S) 4 & 5<br />

DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 4/20/12<br />

NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />

STANDARD 1 STANDARD 2 STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />

1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />

1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />

1.<br />

2.<br />

3.<br />

4.<br />

5.<br />

6.<br />

STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />

ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />

EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />

ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />

TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />

QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />

THIS PROGRAM HAS A WONDERFUL CONNECTION BETWEEN MUSIC<br />

AND SUSTAINABILITY.<br />

8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />

NONE<br />

9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />

NONE<br />

1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />

2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />

3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />

4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />

5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />

6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />

7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />

PROGRAM WAS FUN, EDUCATIONAL AND THE CHILDREN WERE<br />

TRULY ENTERTAINED.<br />

8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />

NONE<br />

9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />

NONE<br />

4<br />

5<br />

4<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

Arts in Education Service - School Evaluations <strong>2011</strong>-<strong>2012</strong><br />

Page 29 of 332


ARTIST: BASH THE TRASH ENVIRONMENTAL AR<br />

CONTRACT #: A8614<br />

TITLE OF PROGRAM: ENVIRONMENTAL ORCHESTRA & STORYTELLING<br />

SOUND SHOW<br />

TYPE OF PROGRAM: ASSEMBLY/WORKSHOP<br />

DISTRICT/ SCHOOL: KATONAH/LEWISBORO/INCREASE MILLER ELEM.<br />

# OF TEACHERS: 3<br />

# OF STUDENTS: 350 GRADE(S) K-6<br />

DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 5/3-7/12<br />

NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />

STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 X STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />

ARTIST: BASH THE TRASH ENVIRONMENTAL AR CONTRACT #: A8408<br />

TITLE OF PROGRAM: JOHN BERTLES - MAKING INSTRUMENTS FROM<br />

RECYCLED MATERIALS<br />

TYPE OF PROGRAM: ASSEMBLY<br />

DISTRICT/ SCHOOL: EASTCHESTER/WAVERLY EARLY CHILDHOOD CTR<br />

# OF TEACHERS: 15 # OF STUDENTS: 500 GRADE(S) K & 1<br />

DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 3/30/12<br />

NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />

STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 X STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4 X<br />

1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />

1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />

1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />

2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />

3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />

4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />

5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />

6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />

7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />

NONE<br />

8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />

NONE<br />

9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />

WONDERFUL PROGRAM. FUN AND EDUCATIONAL.<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />

2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />

3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />

4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />

5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />

6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />

7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />

THE SHOW IS EXTREMELY INTERACTIVE AND ENGAGING. IT TIES IN<br />

WELL TO THE 1ST GRADE CURRICULUM AND THE STUDY OF WIND,<br />

WHICH TAKES PLACE IN MARCH.<br />

8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />

THIS SHOW IS FANTASTIC, EXTREMELY ENGAGING, INTERACTIVE<br />

AND RELEVANT TO THE CURRICULUM AND TO EARTH DAY.<br />

9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />

IT IS A REALLY GOOD WAY TO PRESENT THE ARTS AND SCIENTIFIC<br />

CONCERPTS AS WELL AS RECYCLING INFORMATION. THE<br />

CHILDREN LOVED IT AND IT WAS EDUCATIONAL. IT HELD THEIR<br />

INTEREST AS WELL.<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

ARTIST: BASH THE TRASH ENVIRONMENTAL AR CONTRACT #: A8820<br />

TITLE OF PROGRAM: MAKING INSTRUMENTS FROM RECYCLED<br />

MATERIALS & SHOW<br />

TYPE OF PROGRAM: ASSEMBLY/WORKSHOP<br />

DISTRICT/ SCHOOL:<br />

# OF TEACHERS: 3<br />

PELHAM/SIWANOY ELEM.<br />

# OF STUDENTS: 60 GRADE(S) 3<br />

DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 6/6/12<br />

NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />

STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 X STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />

ARTIST: BAYLIN ARTS MANAGEMENT<br />

CONTRACT #: A7794<br />

TITLE OF PROGRAM: GARRY KRINSKY - TOYING WITH THE ARTS OF<br />

SCIENCE<br />

TYPE OF PROGRAM: ASSEMBLY<br />

DISTRICT/ SCHOOL: EASTCHESTER/EASTCHESTER MIDDLE SCHOOL<br />

# OF TEACHERS: 10 # OF STUDENTS: 250 GRADE(S) 6<br />

DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 5/24/12<br />

NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />

STANDARD 1 STANDARD 2 STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />

1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />

1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />

1.<br />

2.<br />

3.<br />

4.<br />

5.<br />

6.<br />

STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />

ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />

EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />

ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />

TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />

QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />

THE PERFORMANCE WAS VERY ENGAGING AND INFORMATIVE. THE<br />

INFORMATION PROVIDED WAS AT THEIR LEVEL AND JUST THE<br />

RIGHT AMOUNT SO IT WASN'T OVERWHELMING FOR THE STUDENTS<br />

TO UNDERSTAND.<br />

8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />

NONE<br />

9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />

WE HOPE TO WELCOME THEM BACK NEXT YEAR.<br />

1.<br />

2.<br />

3.<br />

4.<br />

5.<br />

6.<br />

STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />

ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />

EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />

ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />

TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />

QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />

IT WAS A WONDERFUL SHOW. GARRY IS FULL OF ENERGY, VERY<br />

BRIGHT AND ENTERTAINING.<br />

8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />

NONE<br />

9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />

NONE<br />

Arts in Education Service - School Evaluations <strong>2011</strong>-<strong>2012</strong><br />

Page 30 of 332


ARTIST: BAYLIN ARTS MANAGEMENT<br />

CONTRACT #: A7673<br />

TITLE OF PROGRAM: RED GRAMMER - MUSICAL SHOW<br />

TYPE OF PROGRAM: ASSEMBLY<br />

DISTRICT/ SCHOOL:<br />

# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />

SOMERS/PRIMROSE ELEM.<br />

# OF STUDENTS: 740 GRADE(S) K-2<br />

DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 10/19/11<br />

NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />

STANDARD 1 STANDARD 2 STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />

ARTIST: BEADZ - MELANIE ROSE<br />

CONTRACT #: A7621A<br />

TITLE OF PROGRAM: BEADING I<br />

TYPE OF PROGRAM: WORKSHOP<br />

DISTRICT/ SCHOOL:<br />

# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />

PELHAM/HUTCHINSON ELEM.<br />

# OF STUDENTS: 7 GRADE(S) K-5<br />

DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 10/14-12/9/11<br />

NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />

STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 X STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />

1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />

1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />

1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />

2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />

3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />

4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />

5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />

6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />

7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />

WE LOVE RED. TEACHERS AND STUDENTS ASK FOR HIM EVERY<br />

YEAR.<br />

8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />

NONE<br />

9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />

NONE<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

N/<br />

1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />

2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />

3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />

4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />

5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />

6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />

7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />

MELANIE IS A PLEASURE TO WORK WITH.<br />

8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />

NONE<br />

9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />

THE STUDENTS LOOK FORWARD TO HER CLASS YEAR AFTER YEAR.<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

ARTIST: BEADZ - MELANIE ROSE<br />

CONTRACT #: A8367A<br />

TITLE OF PROGRAM: BEADING I<br />

TYPE OF PROGRAM: WORKSHOP<br />

DISTRICT/ SCHOOL:<br />

# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />

PELHAM/HUTCHINSON ELEM.<br />

# OF STUDENTS: 10 GRADE(S) K-5<br />

DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 2/3-3/30/12<br />

NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />

STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 X STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />

ARTIST: BEADZ - MELANIE ROSE<br />

CONTRACT #: A7621B<br />

TITLE OF PROGRAM: BEADING II<br />

TYPE OF PROGRAM: WORKSHOP<br />

DISTRICT/ SCHOOL:<br />

# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />

PELHAM/HUTCHINSON ELEM.<br />

# OF STUDENTS: GRADE(S) K-5<br />

DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 10/17-12/5/11<br />

NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />

STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 X STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />

1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />

1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />

1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />

2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />

3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />

4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />

5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />

6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />

2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />

3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />

4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />

5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />

6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM?<br />

MELANIE IS A PLEASURE TO WORK WITH.<br />

Y<br />

WHY?<br />

7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />

MELANIE'S CLASS CONTINUES TO BE A POPULAR CHOICE.<br />

8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />

NONE<br />

9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />

NONE<br />

8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />

NONE<br />

9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />

EVERYONE LOVES THE FINISHED PRODUCTS.<br />

Arts in Education Service - School Evaluations <strong>2011</strong>-<strong>2012</strong><br />

Page 31 of 332


ARTIST: BEADZ - MELANIE ROSE<br />

CONTRACT #: A8367B<br />

TITLE OF PROGRAM: BEADING II<br />

TYPE OF PROGRAM: WORKSHOP<br />

DISTRICT/ SCHOOL:<br />

# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />

PELHAM/HUTCHINSON ELEM.<br />

# OF STUDENTS: 9 GRADE(S) K-5<br />

DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 2/6-3/26/12<br />

NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />

STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 X STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />

ARTIST: BEAUTY & THE BEAST STORYTELLERS CONTRACT #: A8812<br />

TITLE OF PROGRAM: MITCH WEISS & MARTHA HAMILTON SOTRYTELLING<br />

TYPE OF PROGRAM: ASSEMBLY/WORKSHOP<br />

DISTRICT/ SCHOOL: HENDRICK HUDSON/FURNACE WOODS ELEM.<br />

# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />

# OF STUDENTS: GRADE(S) K-5<br />

DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 5/22-24/12<br />

NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />

STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 X STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />

1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />

1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />

1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />

2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />

3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />

4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />

5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />

6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />

2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />

3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />

4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />

5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />

6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM?<br />

MELANIE IS A PLEASURE TO WORK WITH.<br />

Y<br />

WHY?<br />

7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM?<br />

THEY ARE OUTSTANDING.<br />

Y<br />

WHY?<br />

8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />

NONE<br />

9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />

NONE<br />

8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />

NONE<br />

9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />

WORKING WITH MARTHA AND MITCH IS THE HIGHLIGHT OF THE<br />

YEAR.<br />

ARTIST: BEAUTY & THE BEAST STORYTELLERS CONTRACT #: A8142<br />

TITLE OF PROGRAM: MITCH WEISS & MARTHA HAMILTON STORYTELLING<br />

TYPE OF PROGRAM: ASSEMBLY/WORKSHOP<br />

DISTRICT/ SCHOOL: KATONAH/LEWISBORO/INCREASE MILLER ELEM.<br />

# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />

# OF STUDENTS: GRADE(S) K-4<br />

DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 12/1 & 2/11<br />

NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />

STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 X STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />

ARTIST: BELINDA RITTER<br />

CONTRACT #: A8706<br />

TITLE OF PROGRAM: DRUMMING & PERCUSSION MUSIC<br />

TYPE OF PROGRAM: WORKSHOP<br />

DISTRICT/ SCHOOL:<br />

# OF TEACHERS: 3<br />

PEEKSKILL/OAKSIDE ELEM.<br />

# OF STUDENTS: 160 GRADE(S) 2 & 3<br />

DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 4/16-6/8/12<br />

NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />

STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 X STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4 X<br />

1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />

1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />

1.<br />

2.<br />

3.<br />

4.<br />

5.<br />

6.<br />

STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />

ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />

EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />

ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />

TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />

QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />

THEY ARE MASTERS OF THEIR CRAFT. THEY BROUGHT A WEALTH<br />

OF KNOWLEDGE AND EXPERIENCE AND INTERACTED VERY WELL<br />

WITH THE STUDENTS. IT WAS AMAZING TO SEE THE RESULTS THEY<br />

GOT IN SUCH A SHORT AMOUNT OF TIME.<br />

8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />

NONE<br />

9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />

NONE<br />

1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />

2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />

3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />

4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />

5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />

6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />

7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />

THIS IS A GREAT WAY TO DEVELOP CHILDREN'S EYE/HAND/EAR<br />

COORDINATION.<br />

8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />

NONE<br />

9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />

SHE IS A VERY ENTHUSIASTIC AND PROFESSIONAL TEACHING<br />

ARTIST. LOOKING FORWARD TO WORKING WITH HER AGAIN.<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

N/<br />

Arts in Education Service - School Evaluations <strong>2011</strong>-<strong>2012</strong><br />

Page 32 of 332


ARTIST: BENJAMIN TRAVIS<br />

CONTRACT #: A8439<br />

TITLE OF PROGRAM: LIGHTING DESIGNER FOR THE SHOW - A FUNNY<br />

THING HAPPENED ON THE WAY TO THE FORUM<br />

TYPE OF PROGRAM: RESIDENCY<br />

DISTRICT/ SCHOOL: PUTNAM VALLEY/PUTNAM VALLEY HIGH SCHOOL<br />

# OF TEACHERS: 3<br />

# OF STUDENTS: 400 GRADE(S) 9-12<br />

DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 3/3-4/23/12<br />

NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />

STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 X STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />

1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />

ARTIST: BENJAMIN TRAVIS<br />

CONTRACT #: A7820<br />

TITLE OF PROGRAM: LIGHTING DESIGNER FOR THE SHOW - DRACULA<br />

TYPE OF PROGRAM: RESIDENCY<br />

DISTRICT/ SCHOOL: PUTNAM VALLEY/PUTNAM VALLEY HIGH SCHOOL<br />

# OF TEACHERS: 2<br />

# OF STUDENTS: 9 GRADE(S) 9-12<br />

DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 11/1-12/5/11<br />

NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />

STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 X STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />

1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />

1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />

2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />

3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />

4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />

5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />

6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />

7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />

NONE<br />

8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />

NONE<br />

9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />

NONE<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />

2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />

3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />

4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />

5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />

6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />

7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />

NONE<br />

8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />

NONE<br />

9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />

NONE<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

ARTIST: BERNARD MONROE<br />

CONTRACT #: A7647<br />

TITLE OF PROGRAM: MUSICAL THEATRE & DANCE<br />

TYPE OF PROGRAM: RESIDENCY<br />

DISTRICT/ SCHOOL: YORKTOWN/YORKTOWN HIGH SCHOOL<br />

# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />

# OF STUDENTS: GRADE(S) 9-12<br />

DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 11/14/11-3/25/12<br />

NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />

STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 X STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />

ARTIST: BETSY DUBOIS AGENCY, INC.<br />

CONTRACT #: A8863<br />

TITLE OF PROGRAM: BALL IN THE HOUSE - A CAPPELLA GROUP<br />

TYPE OF PROGRAM: ASSEMBLY<br />

DISTRICT/ SCHOOL: KATONAH/LEWISBORO/INCREASE MILLER ELEM.<br />

# OF TEACHERS: 5<br />

# OF STUDENTS: 340 GRADE(S) K-5<br />

DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 5/16/12<br />

NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />

STANDARD 1 STANDARD 2 STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4 X<br />

1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />

1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />

1.<br />

2.<br />

3.<br />

4.<br />

5.<br />

6.<br />

STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />

ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />

EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />

ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />

TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />

QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />

HAVING A PROFESSIONAL CHOREOGRAPHER WHO IS A WORKING<br />

ARTIST WITH PROFESSIONAL STANDARDS IS AN EXCELLENT<br />

EXPERIENCE FOR STUDENTS.<br />

8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />

NONE<br />

9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />

THIS PROGRAM MAKES THE MUSICAL A HIGHLY PROFESSIONAL<br />

AND RICH LEARNING EXPERIENCE FOR THE STUDENTS. THEY<br />

RESPONDED ENTHUSIASTICALLY TO THE EXPERIENCE.<br />

1.<br />

2.<br />

3.<br />

4.<br />

5.<br />

6.<br />

STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />

ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />

EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />

ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />

TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />

QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />

THEY ARE EXTRAORDINARY PERFORMERS WHO DEMONSTRATED<br />

THEIR CRAFT AND EXPLAINED HOW THEY DO IT. THEY ALSO<br />

EMPHASIZED THAT EVERYONE HAS THE ABILITY TO CREATE MUSIC<br />

AND WRITE THEIR OWN SONGS.<br />

8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />

NONE<br />

9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />

NONE<br />

Arts in Education Service - School Evaluations <strong>2011</strong>-<strong>2012</strong><br />

Page 33 of 332


ARTIST: BEVERLY BARKER<br />

CONTRACT #: A7697<br />

TITLE OF PROGRAM: DESIGNING & CREATING A COLONIAL YARN DOLL<br />

TYPE OF PROGRAM: WORKSHOP<br />

DISTRICT/ SCHOOL: CHAPPAQUA/ROARING BROOK ELEM.<br />

# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />

# OF STUDENTS: 95 GRADE(S) 2<br />

DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 11/21/11<br />

NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />

STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 X STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4 X<br />

ARTIST: BEVERLY BARKER<br />

CONTRACT #: A7664<br />

TITLE OF PROGRAM: SEWING AMERICAN GIRL FASHIONS / CRAFTS<br />

TYPE OF PROGRAM: WORKSHOP<br />

DISTRICT/ SCHOOL: EASTCHESTER/GREENVALE ELEM.<br />

# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />

# OF STUDENTS: 9 GRADE(S) 2-4<br />

DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 10/20-12/15/11<br />

NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />

STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 X STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />

1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />

1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />

1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />

2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />

3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />

4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />

5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />

6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />

7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />

NONE<br />

8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />

NONE<br />

9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />

NONE<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

1.<br />

2.<br />

3.<br />

4.<br />

5.<br />

6.<br />

STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />

ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />

EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />

ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />

TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />

QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />

A REALLY GREAT CLASS FOCUSING ON THE ART OF SEWING WHILE<br />

COVERING A BIT OF HISTORY.<br />

8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />

NONE<br />

9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />

NONE<br />

ARTIST: BEVERLY BARKER<br />

CONTRACT #: A8599<br />

TITLE OF PROGRAM: SEWING AMERICAN GIRL FASHIONS / CRAFTS<br />

TYPE OF PROGRAM: WORKSHOP<br />

DISTRICT/ SCHOOL: EASTCHESTER/GREENVALE ELEM.<br />

# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />

# OF STUDENTS: 8 GRADE(S) 2-4<br />

DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 3/8-5/10/12<br />

NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />

STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 X STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />

ARTIST: BIERKO PRODUCTIONS, LLC<br />

CONTRACT #: A7755<br />

TITLE OF PROGRAM: SCOTT & BETH - CREATING A HIT SONG<br />

TYPE OF PROGRAM: RESIDENCY<br />

DISTRICT/ SCHOOL:<br />

# OF TEACHERS: 3<br />

PEEKSKILL/OAKSIDE ELEM.<br />

# OF STUDENTS: 250 GRADE(S) 2 & 3<br />

DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 10/17/11<br />

NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />

STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 X STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />

1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />

1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />

1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />

2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />

3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />

4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />

5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />

6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />

7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />

GREAT CLASS.<br />

8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />

NONE<br />

9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />

NONE<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

N/<br />

1.<br />

2.<br />

3.<br />

4.<br />

5.<br />

6.<br />

STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />

ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />

EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />

ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />

TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />

QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />

WE WOULD DEFINITELY RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM. THIS<br />

PROGRAM GAVE OUR STUDENTS THE OPPORTUNITY TO CREATE<br />

THEIR OWN SONG WHICH ENPOWERED AND MOTIVATED THEM.<br />

8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />

NONE<br />

9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />

NONE<br />

Arts in Education Service - School Evaluations <strong>2011</strong>-<strong>2012</strong><br />

Page 34 of 332


ARTIST: BIERKO PRODUCTIONS, LLC<br />

CONTRACT #: A7654<br />

TITLE OF PROGRAM: SCOTT & BETH - GOLDEN RULE SHOW<br />

TYPE OF PROGRAM: ASSEMBLY<br />

DISTRICT/ SCHOOL:<br />

# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />

OSSINING/PARK SCHOOL<br />

# OF STUDENTS: 41 GRADE(S) PRE K &<br />

DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 6/18/12<br />

NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />

STANDARD 1 STANDARD 2 STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />

ARTIST: BIERKO PRODUCTIONS, LLC<br />

CONTRACT #: A8148<br />

TITLE OF PROGRAM: SCOTT & BETH - GOLDEN RULE SHOW<br />

TYPE OF PROGRAM: ASSEMBLY<br />

DISTRICT/ SCHOOL: EASTCHESTER/WAVERLY EARLY CHILDHOOD CTR<br />

# OF TEACHERS: 12 # OF STUDENTS: 500 GRADE(S) K & 1<br />

DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 12/5/11<br />

NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />

STANDARD 1 STANDARD 2 STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />

1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />

1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />

1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />

2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />

3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />

4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />

5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />

6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />

7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />

THE KINDERGARTENS LOVED THE INTERACTION AND MOVEMENTS.<br />

GRADES 1-2 WOULD ALSO BENEFIT.<br />

8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />

WHEN THEY HAD THE KIDS HOLD HANDS, IT WOULD BE HELPFUL<br />

TO ALERT THE TEACHERS SO IT IS A LITTLE MORE ORGANIZED.<br />

9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />

NONE<br />

ARTIST: BIERKO PRODUCTIONS, LLC<br />

CONTRACT #: A8518<br />

TITLE OF PROGRAM: SCOTT & BETH - GOLDEN RULE SHOW<br />

TYPE OF PROGRAM: ASSEMBLY<br />

DISTRICT/ SCHOOL:<br />

PEEKSKILL/WOODSIDE ELEM.<br />

# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />

# OF STUDENTS: GRADE(S) K & 1<br />

DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE<br />

3/20/12<br />

NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />

STANDARD 1 STANDARD 2 STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />

1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />

5<br />

4<br />

4<br />

5<br />

4<br />

N/<br />

1.<br />

2.<br />

3.<br />

4.<br />

5.<br />

6.<br />

STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />

ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />

EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />

ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />

TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />

QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />

THIS PROGRAM WAS EXCITING, INTERACTIVE, HANDS-ON AND FUN<br />

FOR THE STUDENTS. THEY USED HUMOR, SONGS, DANCES AND<br />

STORYTELLING TO DISCUSS THE TOPICS OF RESPECT, KINDNESS,<br />

ANTI BULLYING, USING GOOD MANNERS, FOLLOWING THE RULES<br />

AND HAVING A PEACEFUL SCHOOL ENVIRONMENT.<br />

8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />

NONE<br />

9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />

ARTIST:<br />

THEY ARE WONDERFUL AND TALENTED PERFORMERS. WE LOOK<br />

FORWARD TO HAVING THEM AGAIN.<br />

BIERKO PRODUCTIONS, LLC<br />

CONTRACT #: A8113<br />

TITLE OF PROGRAM: SCOTT & BETH - HAPPY HOLIDAYS AROUND THE<br />

WORLD<br />

TYPE OF PROGRAM: ASSEMBLY<br />

DISTRICT/ SCHOOL:<br />

MTP/HAWTHORNE ELEM.<br />

# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />

# OF STUDENTS: 420 GRADE(S) K-2<br />

DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 12/19/11<br />

NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />

STANDARD 1 STANDARD 2 STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4 X<br />

1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />

1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />

2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />

3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />

4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />

5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />

6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />

7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />

WONDERFUL SHOW AND THE STUDENTS LOVED IT.<br />

8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />

NONE<br />

9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />

NONE<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

1.<br />

2.<br />

3.<br />

4.<br />

5.<br />

6.<br />

STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />

ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />

EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />

ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />

TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />

QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />

THE ARTISTS MADE CHILDREN AWARE OF DIFFERENT HOLIDAY<br />

TRADITIONS CELEBRATED AROUND THE WORLD HAVING SIMILAR<br />

THEMES - FAMILY, TOLERANCE, LOVE, RESPECT FOR ALL WHILE<br />

UTILIZING MUSIC AND RHYTHMS TO ENGAGE THE STUDENTS.<br />

THEIR USE OF TEACHER PARTICIPATION ENGAGED THE STUDENTS<br />

EVEN MORE.<br />

8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />

NONE<br />

9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />

NONE<br />

Arts in Education Service - School Evaluations <strong>2011</strong>-<strong>2012</strong><br />

Page 35 of 332


ARTIST: BIERKO PRODUCTIONS, LLC<br />

CONTRACT #: A8149<br />

TITLE OF PROGRAM: SCOTT & BETH - NUTRITION MISSION<br />

TYPE OF PROGRAM: ASSEMBLY<br />

DISTRICT/ SCHOOL: EASTCHESTER/WAVERLY EARLY CHILDHOOD CTR<br />

# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />

# OF STUDENTS: 525 GRADE(S) 2<br />

DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 1/12/12<br />

NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />

STANDARD 1 STANDARD 2 STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />

ARTIST: BIERKO PRODUCTIONS, LLC<br />

CONTRACT #: A8642<br />

TITLE OF PROGRAM: SCOTT & BETH - NUTRITION MISSION<br />

TYPE OF PROGRAM: ASSEMBLY<br />

DISTRICT/ SCHOOL:<br />

# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />

MTP/HAWTHORNE ELEM.<br />

# OF STUDENTS: 420 GRADE(S) K-2<br />

DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 3/27/12<br />

NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />

STANDARD 1 STANDARD 2 STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />

1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />

1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />

1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />

2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />

3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />

4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />

5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />

6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />

7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />

THE SHOW WAS HIGHLY INTERACTIVE AND ENGAGING. IT HELD<br />

THE STUDENTS' INTEREST AND ATTENTION WHILE TEACHING<br />

ABOUT THE IMPORTANCE OF HEALTHY EATING, DRINKING WATER<br />

AND PHYSICAL ACTIVITY.<br />

8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />

PART OF THE SHOW ASKS FOR TEACHER PARTICIPATION IN A<br />

SONG. MANY TEACHERS FEEL SHY OR HESITANT ABOUT<br />

PERFORMING AND BEING IN-STAGE. PERHAPS, THEY COULD ASK<br />

FOR STUDENT VOLUNTEERS.<br />

9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />

THERE WAS AN ACTIVITY CALLED THE SNOWBALL FIGHT IN WHICH<br />

STUDENTS THROW SNOWBALLS AT EACH OTHER AS WELL AS THE<br />

TEACHERS. THE TEACHERS FELT THAT IT IS DISRESPECTFUL AND<br />

THAT THE STUDENTS SHOULD ONLY THROW THE SNOWBALLS AT<br />

EACH OTHER.<br />

ARTIST: BLUE FLOWER ARTS, LLC<br />

CONTRACT #: A7805<br />

TITLE OF PROGRAM: TAYLOR MALI - SLAM POETRY<br />

TYPE OF PROGRAM: ASSEMBLY<br />

DISTRICT/ SCHOOL:<br />

CHAPPAQUA/BELL MIDDLE SCHOOL<br />

# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />

# OF STUDENTS: 200 GRADE(S) 7<br />

DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE<br />

11/7/11<br />

NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />

STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />

2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />

3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />

4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />

5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />

6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />

7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />

THE ARTISTS MADE CHILDREN AWARE ABOUT HEALTHY<br />

NUTRITIONAL AND FITNESS CHOICES WHILE USING MUSIC AND<br />

RHYTHMS TO ENGAGE THEM.<br />

8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />

NONE<br />

9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />

THE ARTISTS REALLY WORK WELL WITH THE CHILDREN AND THEIR<br />

PRESENTATION WAS FUN AND MEMORABLE.<br />

ARTIST: BOKANDEYE AFRICAN AMERICAN DANC CONTRACT #: A7652<br />

TITLE OF PROGRAM: AFRICAN AMERICAN DANCE<br />

TYPE OF PROGRAM: ASSEMBLY<br />

DISTRICT/ SCHOOL:<br />

OSSINING/PARK SCHOOL<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

N/<br />

# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />

# OF STUDENTS: 400 GRADE(S) PRE K &<br />

DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE<br />

2/17/12<br />

NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />

STANDARD 1 STANDARD 2 STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4 X<br />

1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />

1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />

1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />

2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />

3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />

4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />

5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />

6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />

7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />

EACH ASSEMBLY WAS APPROX 100 STUDENTS WHICH CAN BE<br />

DAUNTING, BUT THEY WERE RIVETED.<br />

8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />

NEEDED TO PUT POETRY SLAM IN CONTEXT A LITTLE.<br />

9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />

WE WANT HIM BACK.<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

4<br />

4<br />

3<br />

1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />

2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />

3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />

4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />

5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />

6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />

7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />

THE DRUMMING AND DANCING WAS EXCELLENT.<br />

8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />

THIS GROUP NEEDS A GOOD SOUND SYSTEM. IT IS DIFFICULT TO<br />

HEAR SPEAKING AND SINGING DURING THE PROGRAM.<br />

9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />

NONE<br />

4<br />

5<br />

3<br />

4<br />

3<br />

N/<br />

Arts in Education Service - School Evaluations <strong>2011</strong>-<strong>2012</strong><br />

Page 36 of 332


ARTIST: BOKANDEYE AFRICAN AMERICAN DANC CONTRACT #: A8191<br />

TITLE OF PROGRAM: WEST AFRICAN DANCE & DRUM<br />

TYPE OF PROGRAM: ASSEMBLY<br />

DISTRICT/ SCHOOL: DOBBS FERRY/DOBBS FERRY MIDDLE SCHOOL<br />

# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />

# OF STUDENTS: 335 GRADE(S) 6-8<br />

DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 2/17/12<br />

NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />

STANDARD 1 STANDARD 2 STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4 X<br />

ARTIST: BOOMZOOM MEDIA, LLC<br />

CONTRACT #: A8134<br />

TITLE OF PROGRAM: KATIE DAVIS - AUTHOR/ILLUSTRATOR VISIT<br />

TYPE OF PROGRAM: WORKSHOP<br />

DISTRICT/ SCHOOL: CHAPPAQUA/WESTORCHARD ELEM.<br />

# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />

# OF STUDENTS: 90 GRADE(S) K<br />

DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 3/14/12<br />

NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />

STANDARD 1 STANDARD 2 STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />

1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />

1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />

1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />

2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />

3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />

4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />

5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />

6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />

7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />

THE PERFORMANCE WAS HIGH ENERGY AND ALLOWED THE<br />

STUDENTS TO EXPERIENCE ART.<br />

8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />

AN EXPLANATION OF EACH DANCE BEFORE AND AFTER WOULD<br />

HAVE BEEN INFORMATIVE.<br />

9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />

NONE<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

1.<br />

2.<br />

3.<br />

4.<br />

5.<br />

6.<br />

STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />

ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />

EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />

ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />

TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />

QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />

3<br />

5<br />

4<br />

3<br />

N/<br />

N/<br />

7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? N WHY?<br />

WE FELT THAT THE PROGRAM DID NOT WORK FOR OUR STUDENTS.<br />

8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />

WE FEEL THAT IT WOULD BE BENEFICIAL IF THE ARTIST WOULD<br />

OFFER MORE WRITING TIPS TO THE STUDENTS.<br />

9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />

NONE<br />

ARTIST: BOSSY FROG PRODUCTIONS, LLC CONTRACT #: A7655<br />

TITLE OF PROGRAM: BOSSY FROG BAND<br />

TYPE OF PROGRAM: ASSEMBLY<br />

DISTRICT/ SCHOOL:<br />

# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />

OSSINING/PARK SCHOOL<br />

# OF STUDENTS: 250 GRADE(S) PRE K<br />

DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 4/16/12<br />

NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />

STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />

ARTIST: BRADLEY FIELDS PRODUCTIONS CONTRACT #: A7732<br />

TITLE OF PROGRAM: MATHEMAGIC SHOW<br />

TYPE OF PROGRAM: ASSEMBLY<br />

DISTRICT/ SCHOOL: EASTCHESTER/EASTCHESTER MIDDLE SCHOOL<br />

# OF TEACHERS: 10 # OF STUDENTS: 248 GRADE(S) 6<br />

DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 1/2/12<br />

NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />

STANDARD 1 STANDARD 2 STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />

1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />

1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />

1.<br />

2.<br />

3.<br />

4.<br />

5.<br />

6.<br />

STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />

ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />

EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />

ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />

TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />

QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

N/<br />

7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />

THEY WERE FANTASTIC. WE HOPE WE CAN HAVE THEM VISIT OUR<br />

SCHOOL AGAIN.<br />

8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />

NONE<br />

9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />

NONE<br />

1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />

2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />

3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />

4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />

5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />

6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />

7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />

NONE<br />

8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />

BRADLEY WASN'T AS ORGANIZED AS HE USUALLY IS. HE SEEMED<br />

SCATTERED.<br />

9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />

BRADLEY ALWAYS PUTS ON A GREAT SHOW. HOWEVER, TODAY<br />

HE SEEMED "OFF" HIS GAME A BIT. HE WASN'T ABLE TO FINISH HIS<br />

SHOW TODAY.<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

4<br />

5<br />

Arts in Education Service - School Evaluations <strong>2011</strong>-<strong>2012</strong><br />

Page 37 of 332


ARTIST:<br />

BRENDA CONNOR-BEY MILLER<br />

CONTRACT #: A7595C<br />

TITLE OF PROGRAM: EXPERIENTIAL LEARNING THROUGH THE ARTS: THE<br />

OTHER SIDE OF THE MIRROR: WHILE I WAS<br />

DREAMING<br />

TYPE OF PROGRAM: RESIDENCY<br />

DISTRICT/ SCHOOL:<br />

HAWTHORNE CEDAR KNOLLS/JR. & SENIOR HIGH SC<br />

# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />

# OF STUDENTS: GRADE(S) 7-12<br />

DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE<br />

12/14/11-2/1/12<br />

NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />

STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 X STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />

ARTIST:<br />

BRENDA CONNOR-BEY MILLER<br />

CONTRACT #: A7595B<br />

TITLE OF PROGRAM: EXPERIENTIAL LEARNING THROUGH THE ARTS: THE<br />

OTHER SIDE OF THE MIRROR: WHILE I WAS<br />

DREAMING<br />

TYPE OF PROGRAM: RESIDENCY<br />

DISTRICT/ SCHOOL:<br />

HAWTHORNE CEDAR KNOLLS/JR. & SENIOR HIGH SC<br />

# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />

# OF STUDENTS: GRADE(S) 7-12<br />

DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 11/10-12/8/11<br />

NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />

STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 X STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />

1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />

1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />

1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />

2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />

3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />

4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />

5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />

6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

4<br />

1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />

2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />

3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />

4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />

5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />

6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y<br />

IT HAS BEEN A GREAT ASSET TO OUR COMMUNITY.<br />

WHY?<br />

7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y<br />

LESSONS ARE WELL THOUGHT OUT AND ENGAGING.<br />

WHY?<br />

8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />

NONE<br />

9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />

NONE<br />

8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />

NONE<br />

9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />

NONE<br />

ARTIST: BRENDA CONNOR-BEY MILLER<br />

CONTRACT #: A7595D<br />

TITLE OF PROGRAM: EXPERIENTIAL LEARNING THROUGH THE ARTS: THE<br />

OTHER SIDE OF THE MIRROR: WHILE I WAS<br />

DREAMING<br />

TYPE OF PROGRAM: RESIDENCY<br />

DISTRICT/ SCHOOL:<br />

HAWTHORNE CEDAR KNOLLS/JR. & SENIOR HIGH SC<br />

# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />

# OF STUDENTS: 12 GRADE(S) 7-12<br />

DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE<br />

2/2-3/1/12<br />

NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />

STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 X STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />

ARTIST:<br />

BRENDA CONNOR-BEY MILLER<br />

CONTRACT #: A7595A<br />

TITLE OF PROGRAM: EXPERIENTIAL LEARNING THROUGH THE ARTS: THE<br />

OTHER SIDE OF THE MIRROR: WHILE I WAS<br />

DREAMING<br />

TYPE OF PROGRAM: RESIDENCY<br />

DISTRICT/ SCHOOL:<br />

HAWTHORNE CEDAR KNOLLS/JR. & SENIOR HIGH SC<br />

# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />

# OF STUDENTS: GRADE(S) 7-12<br />

DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE<br />

10/26, 27, 11/2, 3 & 9/11<br />

NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />

STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 X STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />

1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />

1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />

1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />

2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />

3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />

4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />

5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />

6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />

7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />

THIS WAS A GREAT OUTLET FOR THE STUDENTS.<br />

8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />

NONE<br />

9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />

NONE<br />

4<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

1.<br />

2.<br />

3.<br />

4.<br />

5.<br />

6.<br />

STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />

ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />

EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />

ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />

TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />

QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />

THE WRITING ACTIVITIES HAVE BEEN THOUGHT PROVOKING AND<br />

ENGAGING.<br />

8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />

NONE<br />

9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />

NONE<br />

Arts in Education Service - School Evaluations <strong>2011</strong>-<strong>2012</strong><br />

Page 38 of 332


ARTIST: BRIAN CARTER<br />

CONTRACT #: A8584<br />

TITLE OF PROGRAM: CREATING A BAND<br />

TYPE OF PROGRAM: RESIDENCY<br />

DISTRICT/ SCHOOL: NEW ROCHELLE/JEFFERSON ELEM.<br />

# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />

# OF STUDENTS: 30 GRADE(S) 4 & 5<br />

DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 3/7-5/17/12<br />

NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />

STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 X STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />

ARTIST: BRIAN DOHERTY<br />

CONTRACT #: A8537<br />

TITLE OF PROGRAM: DRUMMER FOR THE SHOW - AIDA<br />

TYPE OF PROGRAM: ASSEMBLY<br />

DISTRICT/ SCHOOL: OSSINING/OSSINING HIGH SCHOOL<br />

# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />

# OF STUDENTS: 45 GRADE(S) 9-12<br />

DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 3/19-24/12<br />

NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />

STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />

1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />

1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />

1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />

2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />

3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />

4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />

5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />

6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />

7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? N WHY?<br />

BRIAN WAS LATE ALMOST EVERY SESSION AND THEREFORE<br />

CHILDREN WERE WAITING. HE WAS DISORGANIZED WHEN HE<br />

FINALLY GOT HERE.<br />

8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />

ORGANIZE YOUR PROGRAM AHEAD OF TIME BECAUSE CHILDREN<br />

HAVE A HARD TIME WAITING FOR DIRECTIONS.<br />

9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />

BRIAN IS PASSIONATE ABOUT MUSIC BUT FAILED TO UNDERSTAND<br />

DEVELOPMENTAL GROWTH OF 4TH AND 5TH GRADERS.<br />

5<br />

2<br />

2<br />

3<br />

5<br />

5<br />

1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />

2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />

3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />

4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />

5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />

6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />

7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />

BRIAN'S CONTRIBUTION TO THIS PRODUCTION WAS<br />

EXTRAORDINARY. HIS PLAYING ENHANCED THE MUSICALITY<br />

SIGNIFICANTLY.<br />

8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />

NONE<br />

9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />

IT WAS A PLEASURE WORKING WITH HIM. WE WERE LUCKY TO<br />

HAVE SOMEONE OF HIS CALIBURE WORK ALONG SIDE OUR<br />

STUDENTS.<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

ARTIST: BRIAN KEARINS<br />

CONTRACT #: A8735<br />

TITLE OF PROGRAM: GUITAR PLAYER FOR THE SHOW - XANADU<br />

TYPE OF PROGRAM: ASSEMBLY<br />

DISTRICT/ SCHOOL: CHAPPAQUA/HORACE GREELEY HIGH SCHOOL<br />

# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />

# OF STUDENTS: 200 GRADE(S) 12<br />

DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 4/16-21/12<br />

NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />

STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />

ARTIST: BRIAN PINKNEY<br />

CONTRACT #: A8212<br />

TITLE OF PROGRAM: AUTHOR/ILLUSTRATOR VISIT<br />

TYPE OF PROGRAM: ASSEMBLY<br />

DISTRICT/ SCHOOL: NEW ROCHELLE/WARD ELEM. SCHOOL<br />

# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />

# OF STUDENTS: GRADE(S) K-5<br />

DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 1/9/12<br />

NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />

STANDARD 1 STANDARD 2 STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />

1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />

1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />

1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />

2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />

3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />

4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />

5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />

6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />

7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />

IMPORTANT FOR THE STUDENTS TO SEE HOW ALL THE<br />

COMPONENTS OF A MUSICAL SHOW COME TOGETHER.<br />

8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />

NONE<br />

9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />

TALENTED MUSICIAN AND DEDICATED TO HER CRAFT.<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />

2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />

3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />

4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />

5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />

6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />

7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />

BRIAN WAS A GOOD, STRONG SPEAKER AND INTERACTED WELL<br />

WITH THE STUDENTS.<br />

8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />

NONE<br />

9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />

NONE<br />

4<br />

4<br />

5<br />

4<br />

5<br />

N/<br />

Arts in Education Service - School Evaluations <strong>2011</strong>-<strong>2012</strong><br />

Page 39 of 332


ARTIST:<br />

BRIAN PINKNEY<br />

TITLE OF PROGRAM: AUTHOR/ILLUSTRATOR VISIT<br />

TYPE OF PROGRAM: ASSEMBLY<br />

DISTRICT/ SCHOOL:<br />

CONTRACT #: A8754<br />

SOMERS/SOMERS INTERMEDIATE SCHOOL<br />

# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />

# OF STUDENTS: GRADE(S) 3-5<br />

DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE<br />

4/16/12<br />

NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />

STANDARD 1 STANDARD 2 STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />

1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />

1.<br />

2.<br />

3.<br />

4.<br />

5.<br />

6.<br />

STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />

ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />

EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />

ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />

TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />

QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />

BRIAN HAD A LOT OF ENERGY AND A GREAT PRESENTATION. THE<br />

CHILDREN WERE VERY ENGAGED.<br />

8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />

NONE<br />

9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />

NONE<br />

ARTIST: BRIDGES OF PEACE AND HOPE, INC. CONTRACT #: A8772<br />

TITLE OF PROGRAM: THULA SIZWE TROUP - TRADITIONAL ZULU CONCERT<br />

TYPE OF PROGRAM: ASSEMBLY<br />

DISTRICT/ SCHOOL:<br />

KATONAH/LEWISBORO/ALL ELEM. SCHOOLS<br />

# OF TEACHERS: 4<br />

# OF STUDENTS: 1800 GRADE(S) K-5<br />

DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE<br />

4/16-23/12<br />

NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />

STANDARD 1 STANDARD 2 STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4 X<br />

ARTIST: BRIAN ZANE<br />

CONTRACT #: A8503<br />

TITLE OF PROGRAM: MUSICAL DIRECTOR FOR THE SHOW - YOU'RE A<br />

GOOD MAN CHARLIE BROWN<br />

TYPE OF PROGRAM: RESIDENCY<br />

DISTRICT/ SCHOOL: PEEKSKILL/PEEKSKILL HIGH SCHOOL<br />

# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />

# OF STUDENTS: GRADE(S) 9-12<br />

DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 2/13-4/29/12<br />

NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />

STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 X STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />

1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />

1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />

2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />

3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />

4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />

5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />

6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />

7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />

BRIAN IS AN EXCELLENT MUSIC DIRECTOR.<br />

8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />

NONE<br />

9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />

SAD THAT BRIAN IS MOVING TO CHICAGO BUT HAPPY TO HEAR HE<br />

WILL STILL BE WORKING IN ARTS EDUCATION.<br />

ARTIST: BRITT WINSTON<br />

TITLE OF PROGRAM: COMPUTER GRAPHIC ARTS<br />

TYPE OF PROGRAM: WORKSHOP<br />

DISTRICT/ SCHOOL:<br />

CHAPPAQUA/WESTORCHARD ELEM.<br />

CONTRACT #: A7921<br />

# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />

# OF STUDENTS: 9 GRADE(S) K-2<br />

DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE<br />

1/10-3/6/12<br />

NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />

STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 X STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

N/<br />

N/<br />

1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />

1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />

1.<br />

2.<br />

3.<br />

4.<br />

5.<br />

6.<br />

STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />

ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />

EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />

ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />

TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />

QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />

THIS PERFORMANCE GROUP OF 12 ZULU MUSICIANS SANG,<br />

DANCED, DRUMMED, TOLD STORIES AND SHARED THEIR CULTURE.<br />

IT WAS A VITAL, DYNAMIC AND RIVETING ASSEMBLY. THULA<br />

CONNECTED IN A POWERFUL WAY WITH OUT STUDENTS AND<br />

TRULY SHARED THEIR ARTISTIC CULTURE AND OPENED OUR<br />

HEARTS.<br />

8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />

NONE<br />

9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />

THANK YOU.<br />

1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />

2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />

3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />

4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />

5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />

6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />

7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />

NONE<br />

8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />

NONE<br />

9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />

NONE<br />

4<br />

4<br />

4<br />

4<br />

4<br />

N/<br />

Arts in Education Service - School Evaluations <strong>2011</strong>-<strong>2012</strong><br />

Page 40 of 332


ARTIST: BROMLEY PRODUCTIONS, LLC<br />

CONTRACT #: A7677<br />

TITLE OF PROGRAM: YOJO SHOW - TREAT YOUR BODY RIGHT<br />

TYPE OF PROGRAM: ASSEMBLY<br />

DISTRICT/ SCHOOL: PUTNAM VALLEY/PUTNAM VALLEY ELEM.<br />

# OF TEACHERS: 10 # OF STUDENTS: 500 GRADE(S) K-4<br />

DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 10/5/11<br />

NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />

STANDARD 1 STANDARD 2 STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />

ARTIST: BRYAN COLLIER<br />

CONTRACT #: A8276<br />

TITLE OF PROGRAM: AUTHOR/ILLUSTRATOR VISIT<br />

TYPE OF PROGRAM: RESIDENCY<br />

DISTRICT/ SCHOOL: NEW ROCHELLE/DANIEL WEBSTER ELEM.<br />

# OF TEACHERS: 6<br />

# OF STUDENTS: 120 GRADE(S) 4 & 5<br />

DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 1/6-10/11<br />

NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />

STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 X STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />

1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />

1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />

1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />

2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />

3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />

4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />

5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />

6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />

7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />

GREAT FUN, INTERACTIVE AND ENGAGING. INFORMATION<br />

PRESENTED IN AN EASY WAY FOR ELEMENTARY CHILDREN TO<br />

UNDERSTAND.<br />

8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />

MORE VISUALS OF FOOD GROUPS.<br />

9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />

MAY WORK EVEN BETTER WITH SOMEWHAT SMALLER GROUPS DO<br />

TO ALL THE MOVEMENT AND SPACE NEEDED. BUT THAT WAS<br />

MORE AN ISSUE WITH OUR SPACE THAN THE SHOW ITSELF.<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

N/<br />

1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />

2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />

3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />

4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />

5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />

6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />

7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />

BRYAN IS ENGAGING, CLEAR, PREPARED AND GREAT WITH<br />

STUDENTS. HE HAS AN UP CLOSE, PERSONAL STYLE AND<br />

RELATES TO ALL AGES WITH ENTHUSIASM AND RESPECT.<br />

8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />

NONE<br />

9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />

NONE<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

N/<br />

ARTIST: BRYAN McPARTLAN<br />

CONTRACT #: A8451<br />

TITLE OF PROGRAM: SOUND DESIGNER FOR THE SHOW - GUYS & DOLLS<br />

TYPE OF PROGRAM: RESIDENCY<br />

DISTRICT/ SCHOOL: KATONAH/LEWISBORO/JOHN JAY HIGH SCHOOL<br />

# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />

# OF STUDENTS: 80 GRADE(S) 9-12<br />

DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 3/18-24/12<br />

NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />

STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 X STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />

ARTIST: BUREAU OF LECTURES & CONCERT AR<br />

CONTRACT #: A8382<br />

TITLE OF PROGRAM: AFRICAN DANCE & DRUM TROUPE<br />

TYPE OF PROGRAM: ASSEMBLY<br />

DISTRICT/ SCHOOL: MT.VERNON/LONGFELLOW MIDDLE SCHOOL<br />

# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />

# OF STUDENTS: GRADE(S) 7 & 8<br />

DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 2/16/12<br />

NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />

STANDARD 1 STANDARD 2 STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4 X<br />

1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />

1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />

1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />

2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />

3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />

4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />

5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />

6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />

2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />

3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />

4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />

5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />

6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM?<br />

NONE<br />

Y<br />

WHY?<br />

7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM?<br />

NONE<br />

Y<br />

WHY?<br />

8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />

NONE<br />

9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />

NONE<br />

8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />

NONE<br />

9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />

NONE<br />

Arts in Education Service - School Evaluations <strong>2011</strong>-<strong>2012</strong><br />

Page 41 of 332


ARTIST: BUREAU OF LECTURES & CONCERT AR CONTRACT #: A8588<br />

TITLE OF PROGRAM: AFRICAN DANCE & DRUM TROUPE<br />

TYPE OF PROGRAM: ASSEMBLY<br />

DISTRICT/ SCHOOL:<br />

# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />

TARRYTOWN/W. L. MORSE ELEM.<br />

# OF STUDENTS: 400 GRADE(S) 1 & 2<br />

DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 3/1/12<br />

NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />

STANDARD 1 STANDARD 2 STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4 X<br />

ARTIST: BUREAU OF LECTURES & CONCERT AR<br />

CONTRACT #: A7956<br />

TITLE OF PROGRAM: CHINESE ACROBATS SHOW<br />

TYPE OF PROGRAM: ASSEMBLY<br />

DISTRICT/ SCHOOL: LAKELAND/GEORGE WASHINGTON ELEM.<br />

# OF TEACHERS: 11 # OF STUDENTS: 240 GRADE(S) K-2<br />

DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 3/1/12<br />

NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />

STANDARD 1 STANDARD 2 STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4 X<br />

1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />

1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />

1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />

2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />

3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />

4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />

5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />

6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />

7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? N WHY?<br />

THE PERFORMERS LACKED AUTHENTICITY. THE IMPROV PORTION<br />

WAS INAPPROPRIATE.<br />

8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />

NO EXPLANATION OF THE AFRICAN SYBOLISM. NOT A CULTURAL<br />

PERFORMANCE.<br />

9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />

NONE<br />

4<br />

2<br />

2<br />

3<br />

3<br />

1<br />

1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />

2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />

3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />

4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />

5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />

6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />

7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />

STUDENTS LOVED IT.<br />

8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />

NONE<br />

9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />

NONE<br />

4<br />

5<br />

3<br />

4<br />

5<br />

1<br />

ARTIST: BUREAU OF LECTURES & CONCERT AR<br />

CONTRACT #: A8365<br />

TITLE OF PROGRAM: LEM SHEPPARD - MUSICAL HISTORY SHOW / THE<br />

CIVIL WAR<br />

TYPE OF PROGRAM: ASSEMBLY<br />

DISTRICT/ SCHOOL: BREWSTER/GARDEN STREET ELEM.<br />

# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />

# OF STUDENTS: GRADE(S) K-3<br />

DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 1/24/12<br />

NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />

STANDARD 1 STANDARD 2 STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4 X<br />

ARTIST: BUSHIDO SCHOOL OF KARATE, INC. CONTRACT #: A8269<br />

TITLE OF PROGRAM: DAVID BAEZ - ART & CULTURE OF KARATE /<br />

MOVEMENT<br />

TYPE OF PROGRAM: WORKSHOP<br />

DISTRICT/ SCHOOL:<br />

# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />

NORTH SALEM/PQ ELEM.<br />

# OF STUDENTS: 11 GRADE(S) K-3<br />

DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 1/27-4/13/12<br />

NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />

STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 X STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4 X<br />

1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />

1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />

1.<br />

2.<br />

3.<br />

4.<br />

5.<br />

6.<br />

STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />

ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />

EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />

ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />

TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />

QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

N/<br />

7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />

LEM WAS FANTASTIC. THE STUDENTS AND TEACHERS LOVED TO<br />

HEAR THE STORIES AND SONGS. THE STORIES AND ORIGINS OF<br />

THE SONGS KEPT THE STUDENTS INTERESTED AND ENGAGED.<br />

8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />

NONE<br />

9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />

NONE<br />

1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />

2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />

3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />

4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />

5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />

6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />

7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />

NONE<br />

8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />

NONE<br />

9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />

NONE<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

Arts in Education Service - School Evaluations <strong>2011</strong>-<strong>2012</strong><br />

Page 42 of 332


ARTIST: BUSHIDO SCHOOL OF KARATE, INC. CONTRACT #: A7631<br />

TITLE OF PROGRAM: DAVID BAEZ - ART & CULTURE OF KARATE /<br />

MOVEMENT<br />

TYPE OF PROGRAM: WORKSHOP<br />

DISTRICT/ SCHOOL:<br />

# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />

NORTH SALEM/PQ ELEM.<br />

# OF STUDENTS: GRADE(S) K-3<br />

DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 10/14-12/16/11<br />

NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />

STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 X STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4 X<br />

ARTIST: C.A.S.L.E., INC.<br />

CONTRACT #: A8275<br />

TITLE OF PROGRAM: DEBRA ARONSON - THE ART OF AMERICAN SIGN<br />

LANGUAGE<br />

TYPE OF PROGRAM: WORKSHOP<br />

DISTRICT/ SCHOOL: DOBBS FERRY/SPRINGHURST ELEM.<br />

# OF TEACHERS: 5<br />

# OF STUDENTS: 107 GRADE(S) K<br />

DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 1/26-5/30/12<br />

NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />

STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 X STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4 X<br />

1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />

1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />

1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />

2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />

3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />

4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />

5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />

6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />

7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />

NONE<br />

8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />

NONE<br />

9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />

NONE<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

1.<br />

2.<br />

3.<br />

4.<br />

5.<br />

6.<br />

STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />

ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />

EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />

ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />

TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />

QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />

DEBRA LOVES WHAT SHE TEACHES. SHE IS UPBEAT AND HELPS<br />

THE STUDENTS TO LEARN AND HAVE FUN.<br />

8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />

NONE<br />

9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />

THIS PROGRAM IS WONDERFUL. EVERY YEAR DEBRA BRINGS<br />

MORE BOOKS, GAMES AND IDEAS. THE CHILDREN LOVE SIGN<br />

LANGUAGE.<br />

ARTIST: CALPULLI MEXICAN DANCE COMPANY CONTRACT #: A8304<br />

TITLE OF PROGRAM: NOEMY HERNANDEZ - MEXICAN DANCE & CULTURE<br />

TYPE OF PROGRAM: ASSEMBLY/WORKSHOP<br />

DISTRICT/ SCHOOL: NEW ROCHELLE/DAVIS ELEM. SCHOOL<br />

# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />

# OF STUDENTS: 127 GRADE(S) 3<br />

DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 1/18-3/12/12<br />

NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />

STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 X STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4 X<br />

1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />

ARTIST: CAMILLE LINEN<br />

CONTRACT #: A7535A<br />

TITLE OF PROGRAM: LITERACY THROUGH THE ARTS - COORD. &<br />

CONSULTANT<br />

TYPE OF PROGRAM: RESIDENCY<br />

DISTRICT/ SCHOOL: PORT CHESTER/ALL ELEM. SCHOOLS<br />

# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />

# OF STUDENTS: GRADE(S) K-5<br />

DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE SEPT., <strong>2011</strong>-JUNE, <strong>2012</strong><br />

NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />

STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 X STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4 X<br />

1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />

1.<br />

2.<br />

3.<br />

4.<br />

5.<br />

6.<br />

STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />

ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />

EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />

ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />

TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />

QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />

WE HAD A LIVE MUSIC ASSEMBLY THAT WAS SPECTACULAR. OUR<br />

RESIDENT ARTIST, NOEMY, WAS EXPERIENCED AND VERY WELL<br />

ORGANIZED FROM THE DANCE ROUTINES TO THE COSTUMES.<br />

8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />

NONE<br />

9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />

SHE RELATED TO THE CHILDREN IN A GENTLE MANNER AND<br />

ENCOURAGED THEM TO DO THEIR BEST. THEY LEARNED ABOUT<br />

AREAS OF MEXICO, COSTUMES, CUSTOMS, TRADITIONS AND<br />

LANGUAGE AS WELL AS DANCE - HIGHLY RECOMMEND.<br />

1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />

2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />

3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />

4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />

5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />

6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />

7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />

NONE<br />

8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />

NONE<br />

9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />

NONE<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

Arts in Education Service - School Evaluations <strong>2011</strong>-<strong>2012</strong><br />

Page 43 of 332


ARTIST: CARA FRANZE<br />

CONTRACT #: A8618<br />

TITLE OF PROGRAM: JAZZ DANCING<br />

TYPE OF PROGRAM: WORKSHOP<br />

DISTRICT/ SCHOOL: EASTCHESTER/GREENVALE ELEM.<br />

# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />

# OF STUDENTS: 30 GRADE(S) 4 & 5<br />

DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 3/13-5/15/12<br />

NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />

STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 X STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4 X<br />

ARTIST: CARAMOOR<br />

CONTRACT #: A7831<br />

TITLE OF PROGRAM: IN-SCHOOL ORCHESTRA SEMINAR<br />

TYPE OF PROGRAM: WORKSHOP<br />

DISTRICT/ SCHOOL: BYRAM HILLS/BYRAM HILLS HIGH SCHOOL<br />

# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />

# OF STUDENTS: 94 GRADE(S) 9-12<br />

DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 11/21/11<br />

NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />

STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />

1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />

1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />

1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />

2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />

3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />

4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />

5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />

6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

N/<br />

1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />

2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />

3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />

4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />

5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />

6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM?<br />

ALWAYS A FAVORITE.<br />

Y<br />

WHY?<br />

7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM?<br />

NONE<br />

Y<br />

WHY?<br />

8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />

NONE<br />

9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />

NONE<br />

8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />

NONE<br />

9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />

ANOTHER GREAT PROGRAM. THANKS.<br />

ARTIST: CARAMOOR<br />

CONTRACT #: A7897A<br />

TITLE OF PROGRAM: LINDEN QUARTET CLINIC<br />

TYPE OF PROGRAM: WORKSHOP<br />

DISTRICT/ SCHOOL: KATONAH/LEWISBORO/JOHN JAY MIDDLE SCHOOL<br />

# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />

# OF STUDENTS: 15 GRADE(S) 6-8<br />

DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 11/22/11<br />

NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />

STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />

ARTIST: CARAMOOR<br />

CONTRACT #: A7897B<br />

TITLE OF PROGRAM: LINDEN QUARTET WORKSHOP<br />

TYPE OF PROGRAM: WORKSHOP<br />

DISTRICT/ SCHOOL: KATONAH/LEWISBORO/JOHN JAY MIDDLE SCHOOL<br />

# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />

# OF STUDENTS: 25 GRADE(S) 6-8<br />

DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 3/27/12<br />

NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />

STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />

1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />

1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />

1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />

2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />

3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />

4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />

5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />

6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />

7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />

STUDENTS WERE ENGAGED AND RELATED TO THE MUSIC<br />

PRESENTED.<br />

8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />

KEEP SELECTIONS SHORT.<br />

9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />

THEY ADAPTED TO THE AGE AND EXPERIENCE OF THEIR AUDIENCE.<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />

2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />

3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />

4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />

5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />

6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />

7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />

OMDEM QUARTET WAS VERY ENGAGING, RELAXED AND HAD A<br />

WELL THOUGHT OUT PLAN. THEY WERE FLEXIBLE AND<br />

ACCOMODATING.<br />

8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />

FOR CONCERT AND CONVERATION, SEND OUTLINE OF<br />

PRESENTATION BEFORE VISIT WITH COMPOSERS NAMES AND<br />

SELECTIONS. BIO OF QUARTET WOULD BE HELPFUL. FLYERS 2<br />

WEEKS BEFORE VISIT.<br />

9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />

WE LOOK FORWARD TO THE PRESENTATION EACH YEAR.<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

Arts in Education Service - School Evaluations <strong>2011</strong>-<strong>2012</strong><br />

Page 44 of 332


ARTIST: CARLTON VAN PYRZ<br />

CONTRACT #: A8446<br />

TITLE OF PROGRAM: PICASSO PEOPLE<br />

TYPE OF PROGRAM: ASSEMBLY<br />

DISTRICT/ SCHOOL:<br />

# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />

TARRYTOWN/W. L. MORSE ELEM.<br />

# OF STUDENTS: 200 GRADE(S) 2<br />

DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 2/16/12<br />

NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />

STANDARD 1 STANDARD 2 STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />

ARTIST: CAROL ARRUCCI<br />

CONTRACT #: A7929<br />

TITLE OF PROGRAM: MUSICAL DIRECTOR WINTER SHOW<br />

TYPE OF PROGRAM: RESIDENCY<br />

DISTRICT/ SCHOOL: BRIARCLIFF/BRIARCLIFF HIGH SCHOOL<br />

# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />

# OF STUDENTS: 70 GRADE(S) 9-12<br />

DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 11/2/11-3/11/12<br />

NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />

STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />

1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />

1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />

1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />

2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />

3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />

4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />

5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />

6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />

7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />

STUDENTS WERE COMPLETELY ENGAGED. TEACHERS WERE<br />

EXCITED AND IMPRESSED AS WELL.<br />

8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />

NONE<br />

9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />

ARTIST:<br />

HE ALWAYS MAKES IT SO MUCH FUN FOR THE STUDENTS TO<br />

LEARN THE SIGNIFICANT ASPECTS OF PICASSO'S LIFE AND WORK<br />

CAROL JEAN COLLINS<br />

CONTRACT #: A7704<br />

TITLE OF PROGRAM: COSTUME DESIGNER FOR THE FALL MUSICAL -<br />

ANNIE GET YOUR GUN<br />

TYPE OF PROGRAM: RESIDENCY<br />

DISTRICT/ SCHOOL:<br />

LAKELAND/WALTER PANAS HIGH SCHOOL<br />

# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />

# OF STUDENTS: 100 GRADE(S) 9-12<br />

DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE<br />

10/3-11/19/11<br />

NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />

STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 X STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />

2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />

3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />

4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />

5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />

6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />

7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />

SHE DOES A FIRST RATE JOB.<br />

8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />

SCHEDULE CONFLICTS OCCUR THAT WOULD NEED TO BE<br />

ADDRESSED BEFORE NEXT TIME.<br />

9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />

ARTIST:<br />

I HOPE SHE CONTINUES TO OFFER HER SKILLS TO OUR SCHOOL.<br />

CAROL JEAN COLLINS<br />

CONTRACT #: A8321<br />

TITLE OF PROGRAM: COSTUME DESIGNER FOR THE SPRING MUSICAL -<br />

MY FAIR LADY<br />

TYPE OF PROGRAM: RESIDENCY<br />

DISTRICT/ SCHOOL:<br />

LAKELAND/WALTER PANAS HIGH SCHOOL<br />

# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />

# OF STUDENTS: 200 GRADE(S) 9-12<br />

DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE<br />

3/5-5/5/12<br />

NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />

STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 X STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />

1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />

1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />

2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />

3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />

4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />

5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />

6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />

2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />

3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />

4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />

5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />

6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM?<br />

NONE<br />

Y<br />

WHY?<br />

7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM?<br />

NONE<br />

Y<br />

WHY?<br />

8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />

NONE<br />

9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />

NONE<br />

8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />

NONE<br />

9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />

NONE<br />

Arts in Education Service - School Evaluations <strong>2011</strong>-<strong>2012</strong><br />

Page 45 of 332


ARTIST: CASEY CARLE dba K & C ENTERPRISES<br />

CONTRACT #: A7720<br />

TITLE OF PROGRAM: BUBBLEMANIA COMEDY, ART & SCRIENCE SHOW<br />

TYPE OF PROGRAM: ASSEMBLY<br />

DISTRICT/ SCHOOL:<br />

# OF TEACHERS: 4<br />

CHAPPAQUA/GRAFFLIN ELEM.<br />

# OF STUDENTS: 78 GRADE(S) K<br />

DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 5/11/12<br />

NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />

STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />

ARTIST: CASEY CARLE dba K & C ENTERPRISES CONTRACT #: A8074<br />

TITLE OF PROGRAM: BUBBLEMANIA COMEDY, ART & SCRIENCE SHOW<br />

TYPE OF PROGRAM: ASSEMBLY<br />

DISTRICT/ SCHOOL:<br />

# OF TEACHERS: 3<br />

CARMEL/PATERSON ELEM.<br />

# OF STUDENTS: 625 GRADE(S) K-4<br />

DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 6/14/12<br />

NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />

STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />

1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />

1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />

1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />

2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />

3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />

4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />

5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />

6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />

2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />

3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />

4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />

5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />

6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM?<br />

ENGAGING AND AGE APPROPRIATE.<br />

Y<br />

WHY?<br />

7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM?<br />

EXCELLENT PROGRAM.<br />

Y<br />

WHY?<br />

8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />

NONE<br />

9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />

NONE<br />

8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />

NONE<br />

9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />

GREAT JOB.<br />

ARTIST: CASEY CARLE dba K & C ENTERPRISES CONTRACT #: A8146<br />

TITLE OF PROGRAM: BUBBLEMANIA COMEDY, ART & SCRIENCE SHOW<br />

TYPE OF PROGRAM: WORKSHOP<br />

DISTRICT/ SCHOOL: LAKELAND/BENJAMIN FRANKLIN ELEM.<br />

# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />

# OF STUDENTS: 93 GRADE(S) K<br />

DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 5/15/12<br />

NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />

STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />

ARTIST: CASEY CARLE dba K & C ENTERPRISES CONTRACT #: A7576<br />

TITLE OF PROGRAM: BUBBLEMANIA COMEDY, ART & SCRIENCE SHOW<br />

TYPE OF PROGRAM: ASSEMBLY<br />

DISTRICT/ SCHOOL:<br />

# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />

BYRAM HILLS/COMAN HILL ELEM.<br />

# OF STUDENTS: 200 GRADE(S) 1<br />

DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 3/8/12<br />

NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />

STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />

1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />

1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />

1.<br />

2.<br />

3.<br />

4.<br />

5.<br />

6.<br />

STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />

ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />

EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />

ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />

TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />

QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />

WE FOUND OUR STUDENTS WERE MUCH MORE ON TASK FOR A<br />

MORNING PERFORMANCE. ARTIST AND STUDENTS HAD A GOOD<br />

INTERACTION.<br />

8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />

NONE<br />

9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />

THANK YOU.<br />

1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />

2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />

3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />

4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />

5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />

6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />

7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />

NONE<br />

8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />

NONE<br />

9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />

NONE<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

4<br />

5<br />

4<br />

Arts in Education Service - School Evaluations <strong>2011</strong>-<strong>2012</strong><br />

Page 46 of 332


ARTIST: CASEY CARLE dba K & C ENTERPRISES<br />

CONTRACT #: A7950<br />

TITLE OF PROGRAM: BUBBLEMANIA COMEDY, ART & SCRIENCE SHOW<br />

TYPE OF PROGRAM: ASSEMBLY<br />

DISTRICT/ SCHOOL:<br />

# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />

CHAPPAQUA/GRAFFLIN ELEM.<br />

# OF STUDENTS: 100 GRADE(S) K<br />

DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 5/15/12<br />

NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />

STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />

ARTIST: CASEY CARLE dba K & C ENTERPRISES CONTRACT #: A8789<br />

TITLE OF PROGRAM: BUBBLEMANIA COMEDY, ART & SCRIENCE SHOW<br />

TYPE OF PROGRAM: ASSEMBLY<br />

DISTRICT/ SCHOOL: LAKELAND/THOMAS JEFFERSON ELEM.<br />

# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />

# OF STUDENTS: GRADE(S) K & 1<br />

DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 6/12/12<br />

NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />

STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />

1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />

1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />

1.<br />

2.<br />

3.<br />

4.<br />

5.<br />

6.<br />

STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />

ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />

EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />

ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />

TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />

QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />

THE CHILDREN LOVED BUBBLEMANIA. HE ENGAGED THEM IN HIS<br />

ARTISTRY, HUMOR AND SCIENCE.<br />

8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />

NONE<br />

9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />

ARTIST:<br />

IT WAS GREAT.<br />

CASEY CARLE dba K & C ENTERPRISES<br />

CONTRACT #: A7811<br />

TITLE OF PROGRAM: BUBBLEMANIA COMEDY, ART & SCRIENCE SHOW<br />

TYPE OF PROGRAM: ASSEMBLY<br />

DISTRICT/ SCHOOL:<br />

CHAPPAQUA/WESTORCHARD ELEM.<br />

# OF TEACHERS: 5<br />

# OF STUDENTS: 90 GRADE(S) K<br />

DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE<br />

5/16/12<br />

NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />

STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />

1.<br />

2.<br />

3.<br />

4.<br />

5.<br />

6.<br />

STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />

ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />

EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />

ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />

TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />

QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />

5<br />

2<br />

3<br />

2<br />

3<br />

2<br />

7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />

WE LOVED THE SHOW BUT THE PRESENTOR WAS VERY SARCASTIC.<br />

8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />

WE WOULD LIKE TO KEEP THE SHOW BUT WOULD LIKE TO TRY<br />

ANOTHER PRESENTOR FOR YOUNGER CHILDREN.<br />

9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />

ARTIST:<br />

NONE<br />

CASEY CARLE dba K & C ENTERPRISES<br />

CONTRACT #: A8080<br />

TITLE OF PROGRAM: BUBBLEMANIA COMEDY, ART & SCRIENCE SHOW<br />

TYPE OF PROGRAM: ASSEMBLY<br />

DISTRICT/ SCHOOL:<br />

LAKELAND/LINCOLN-TITUS ELEM.<br />

# OF TEACHERS: 8<br />

# OF STUDENTS: 155 GRADE(S) K & 1<br />

DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE<br />

5/16/12<br />

NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />

STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />

1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />

1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />

1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />

2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />

3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />

4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />

5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />

6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />

2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />

3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />

4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />

5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />

6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM?<br />

TERRIFIC.<br />

8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />

NONE<br />

9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />

NONE<br />

Y<br />

WHY?<br />

7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />

ALL THE STUDENTS WERE THOROUGHLY ENGAGED AND CASEY<br />

HAD GOOD CONTROL OF HIS AUDIENCE.<br />

8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />

NONE<br />

9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />

VERY AGE APPROPRIATE AND INTERACTIVE.<br />

Arts in Education Service - School Evaluations <strong>2011</strong>-<strong>2012</strong><br />

Page 47 of 332


ARTIST: CASEY CARLE dba K & C ENTERPRISES<br />

CONTRACT #: A8542<br />

TITLE OF PROGRAM: BUBBLEMANIA COMEDY, ART & SCRIENCE SHOW<br />

TYPE OF PROGRAM: ASSEMBLY<br />

DISTRICT/ SCHOOL:<br />

# OF TEACHERS: 3<br />

PEEKSKILL/WOODSIDE ELEM.<br />

# OF STUDENTS: 625 GRADE(S) PRE K-1<br />

DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 6/7/12<br />

NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />

STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />

1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />

ARTIST: CASTLE OF DREAMS MUSIC<br />

CONTRACT #: A7833<br />

TITLE OF PROGRAM: ANNIE & THE NATURAL WONDER BAND - RAIN<br />

FOREST CONCERT<br />

TYPE OF PROGRAM: ASSEMBLY<br />

DISTRICT/ SCHOOL: NEW ROCHELLE/WARD ELEM. SCHOOL<br />

# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />

# OF STUDENTS: GRADE(S) K & 1<br />

DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 4/18/12<br />

NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />

STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />

1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />

1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />

2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />

3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />

4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />

5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />

6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />

7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />

WONDERFUL SHOW.<br />

8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />

NONE<br />

9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />

SHOW IS FABULOUS.<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />

2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />

3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />

4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />

5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />

6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />

7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />

THIS WAS AN ENGAGING INTERACTIVE PROGRAM.<br />

8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />

NONE<br />

9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />

WE LOVED LEARNING ABOUT THE RAIN FOREST THROUGH THE<br />

LYRICS OF CATCHY SONGS.<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

ARTIST: CATHERINE (KATIE) SCHMIDT FEDER CONTRACT #: A8194<br />

TITLE OF PROGRAM: COSTUME DESIGNER WORKSHOPS FOR THE SHOW<br />

TYPE OF PROGRAM: RESIDENCY<br />

DISTRICT/ SCHOOL:<br />

# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />

GARRISON/GARRISON SCHOOL<br />

# OF STUDENTS: 40 GRADE(S) 6<br />

DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 12/13/11-1/15/12<br />

NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />

STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 X STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />

ARTIST: CATHERINE (KATIE) SCHMIDT FEDER CONTRACT #: A8003<br />

TITLE OF PROGRAM: COSTUME DESIGNER WORKSHOPS FOR THE SHOW<br />

TYPE OF PROGRAM: RESIDENCY<br />

DISTRICT/ SCHOOL: PEEKSKILL/PEEKSKILL HIGH SCHOOL<br />

# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />

# OF STUDENTS: GRADE(S) 9-12<br />

DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 11/11-12/3/11<br />

NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />

STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 X STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />

1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />

1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />

1.<br />

2.<br />

3.<br />

4.<br />

5.<br />

6.<br />

STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />

ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />

EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />

ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />

TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />

QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />

KATIE DOES A GREAT JOB. SHE IS CONFIDENT AND ORGANIZED.<br />

8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />

MAYBE SOME MATERIALS ON ACTING FOR STUDENTS TO STUDY.<br />

9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />

NONE<br />

1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />

2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />

3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />

4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />

5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />

6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />

7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />

NONE<br />

8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />

NONE<br />

9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />

NONE<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

Arts in Education Service - School Evaluations <strong>2011</strong>-<strong>2012</strong><br />

Page 48 of 332


ARTIST: CATHERINE (KATIE) SCHMIDT FEDER CONTRACT #: A8477<br />

TITLE OF PROGRAM: DRAMA & VOICE COACH FOR THE SHOW<br />

TYPE OF PROGRAM: RESIDENCY<br />

DISTRICT/ SCHOOL:<br />

# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />

GARRISON/GARRISON SCHOOL<br />

# OF STUDENTS: 27 GRADE(S) 8<br />

DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 3/5-4/6/12<br />

NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />

STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 X STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />

ARTIST: CATHERINE (KATIE) SCHMIDT FEDER CONTRACT #: A8708<br />

TITLE OF PROGRAM: PERFORMING STORIES<br />

TYPE OF PROGRAM: WORKSHOP<br />

DISTRICT/ SCHOOL:<br />

# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />

PEEKSKILL/WOODSIDE ELEM.<br />

# OF STUDENTS: 21 GRADE(S) K & 1<br />

DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 5/2-6/8/12<br />

NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />

STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 X STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />

1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />

1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />

1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />

2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />

3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />

4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />

5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />

6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />

7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />

KATIE DOES A GREAT JOB OF ENGAGING STUDENTS AND<br />

MAINTAINS HIGH EXPECTIONS OF WHAT THEY CAN DO WITH<br />

SHAKESPEARE.<br />

8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />

NONE<br />

9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />

NONE<br />

4<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

4<br />

1.<br />

2.<br />

3.<br />

4.<br />

5.<br />

6.<br />

STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />

ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />

EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />

ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />

TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />

QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

N/<br />

7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />

SHE IS A HIGHLY TRAINED AND EXPERIENCED PROFESSIONAL.<br />

HER ORGANIZATIONAL SKILLS MAKE HER CREATIVE PROCESS AND<br />

TEACHING EFFICIENT.<br />

8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />

NONE<br />

9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />

LOOK FORWARD TO HAVE HER AGAIN.<br />

ARTIST: CATHERINE A. KLISE<br />

CONTRACT #: A8487<br />

TITLE OF PROGRAM: AUTHOR VISIT<br />

TYPE OF PROGRAM: ASSEMBLY<br />

DISTRICT/ SCHOOL:<br />

# OF TEACHERS: 2<br />

NORTH SALEM/PQ ELEM.<br />

# OF STUDENTS: GRADE(S) 4<br />

DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 3/2/12<br />

NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />

STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />

ARTIST: CATHERINE COURTER<br />

CONTRACT #: A8695<br />

TITLE OF PROGRAM: ART OF SEWING<br />

TYPE OF PROGRAM: RESIDENCY<br />

DISTRICT/ SCHOOL: KATONAH/LEWISBORO/KATONAH ELEM. SCHOOL<br />

# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />

# OF STUDENTS: 9 GRADE(S) K-2<br />

DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 4/11-5/30/12<br />

NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />

STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 X STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />

1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />

1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />

1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />

2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />

3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />

4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />

5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />

6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

4<br />

1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />

2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />

3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />

4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />

5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />

6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />

4<br />

4<br />

4<br />

4<br />

4<br />

4<br />

7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />

KATE TEACHES THE CHILDREN HER CRAFT IN AN ENGAGING,<br />

ENTHUSIASTIC AND INTERACTIVE MANNER. HER IDEAS AND<br />

SUGGESTIONS WERE INSPIRING TO MANY.<br />

8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />

NONE<br />

9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />

THEY THOROUGHLY ENJOYED THE PRESENTAITON.<br />

7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM?<br />

NONE<br />

8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />

NONE<br />

9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />

NONE<br />

Y<br />

WHY?<br />

Arts in Education Service - School Evaluations <strong>2011</strong>-<strong>2012</strong><br />

Page 49 of 332


ARTIST: CATHERINE GMOSER<br />

CONTRACT #: A8174<br />

TITLE OF PROGRAM: DIRECTOR & PRODUCER OF THE SHOW - ANNIE GET<br />

YOUR GUN<br />

TYPE OF PROGRAM: RESIDENCY<br />

DISTRICT/ SCHOOL:<br />

# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />

TUCKAHOE/TUCKAHOE MS & HS<br />

# OF STUDENTS: GRADE(S) 6-12<br />

DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 10/10/11-3/19/12<br />

NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />

STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 X STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />

1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />

ARTIST: CATHERINE RIEDEL<br />

CONTRACT #: A8620<br />

TITLE OF PROGRAM: CHOREOGRAPHER FOR THE SHOW - ANNIE<br />

TYPE OF PROGRAM: RESIDENCY<br />

DISTRICT/ SCHOOL: CROTON/PIERRE VAN CORT MIDDLE SCHOOL<br />

# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />

# OF STUDENTS: GRADE(S) 5-8<br />

DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 3/16-4/16/12<br />

NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />

STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 X STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />

1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />

1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />

2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />

3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />

4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />

5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />

6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />

7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />

NONE<br />

8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />

NONE<br />

9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />

NONE<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

1.<br />

2.<br />

3.<br />

4.<br />

5.<br />

6.<br />

STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />

ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />

EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />

ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />

TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />

QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />

THE STUDENTS WERE GIVEN AN AMAZING OPPORTUNITY TO<br />

PARTICIPATE IN A VARIETY OF DANCING ROUTINES. THE<br />

STUDENTS FELT GOOD ABOUT THEMSELVES AND ENJOYED THIS<br />

OPPORTUNITY.<br />

8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />

NONE<br />

9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />

NONE<br />

ARTIST: CAVERLY (LEE) E. STRINGER<br />

CONTRACT #: A7738<br />

TITLE OF PROGRAM: AUTHOR VISIT - PERSONAL EXPRESSION &<br />

ADVERSITY<br />

TYPE OF PROGRAM: ASSEMBLY<br />

DISTRICT/ SCHOOL: CHAPPAQUA/BELL MIDDLE SCHOOL<br />

# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />

# OF STUDENTS: 175 GRADE(S) 7<br />

DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 9/28/11<br />

NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />

STANDARD 1 STANDARD 2 STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />

ARTIST: CENTRAL PARK ZOO EDUCATION DEPT.<br />

CONTRACT #: A7941<br />

TITLE OF PROGRAM: WILDLIFE THEATRE PRESENTS: PETUNIA PENGUIN<br />

GOES TO SCHOOL<br />

TYPE OF PROGRAM: ASSEMBLY<br />

DISTRICT/ SCHOOL: HENDRICK HUDSON/BUCHANAN/VERPLANCK ELEM.<br />

# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />

# OF STUDENTS: 43 GRADE(S) K<br />

DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 1/27/12<br />

NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />

STANDARD 1 STANDARD 2 STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />

1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />

1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />

1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />

2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />

3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />

4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />

5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />

6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />

7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />

LEE DOES A FINE JOB.<br />

8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />

NONE<br />

9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />

NONE<br />

5<br />

4<br />

5<br />

5<br />

N/<br />

N/<br />

1.<br />

2.<br />

3.<br />

4.<br />

5.<br />

6.<br />

STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />

ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />

EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />

ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />

TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />

QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />

THE SHOW DID A GREAT JOB SHARING PENGUIN INFO WITH WAYS<br />

THAT WERE VERY CHILDREN FRIENDLY.<br />

8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />

NONE<br />

9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />

NONE<br />

Arts in Education Service - School Evaluations <strong>2011</strong>-<strong>2012</strong><br />

Page 50 of 332


ARTIST: CHALERMPORN CHARPAKORN<br />

CONTRACT #: A7960A<br />

TITLE OF PROGRAM: GUITAR<br />

TYPE OF PROGRAM: WORKSHOP<br />

DISTRICT/ SCHOOL:<br />

# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />

PELHAM/COLONIAL ELEM.<br />

# OF STUDENTS: 9 GRADE(S) K-2<br />

DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 11/28/11-2/13/12<br />

NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />

STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 X STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />

ARTIST: CHALERMPORN CHARPAKORN<br />

CONTRACT #: A7960B<br />

TITLE OF PROGRAM: GUITAR<br />

TYPE OF PROGRAM: WORKSHOP<br />

DISTRICT/ SCHOOL:<br />

# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />

PELHAM/COLONIAL ELEM.<br />

# OF STUDENTS: 6 GRADE(S) 3-5<br />

DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 11/29/11-2/14/12<br />

NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />

STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 X STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />

1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />

1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />

1.<br />

2.<br />

3.<br />

4.<br />

5.<br />

6.<br />

STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />

ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />

EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />

ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />

TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />

QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

N/<br />

N/<br />

7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />

JOE IS PATIENT AND PLEASANT. HE INTRODUCED THE CHILDREN<br />

TO BASIC GUITAR TECHNIQUES AND LEARN BEGINNER MUSIC AND<br />

PLAY SONGS.<br />

8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />

NONE<br />

9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />

NONE<br />

1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />

2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />

3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />

4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />

5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />

6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />

7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />

JOE IS AN EXCELLENT TEACHER. THE MUSIC HE SELECTS<br />

ENGAGES THE CHILDREN AND HE IS VERY PATIENT.<br />

8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />

NONE<br />

9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />

THANKS FOR A GREAT PROGRAM.<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

N/<br />

ARTIST: CHARIOT OF THE SUN<br />

CONTRACT #: A7954<br />

TITLE OF PROGRAM: JEFFREY BENOIT - GREEK MYTHOLOGY<br />

TYPE OF PROGRAM: ASSEMBLY<br />

DISTRICT/ SCHOOL: PUTNAM VALLEY/PUTNAM VALLEY MIDDLE SCHOOL<br />

# OF TEACHERS: 7<br />

# OF STUDENTS: 150 GRADE(S) 6<br />

DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 3/12/12<br />

NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />

STANDARD 1 STANDARD 2 STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4 X<br />

ARTIST: CHARLES R. SMITH, JR.<br />

CONTRACT #: A8489<br />

TITLE OF PROGRAM: AUTHOR VISIT - POETRY PUT TO WORK<br />

TYPE OF PROGRAM: ASSEMBLY<br />

DISTRICT/ SCHOOL:<br />

# OF TEACHERS: 2<br />

NORTH SALEM/PQ ELEM.<br />

# OF STUDENTS: 100 GRADE(S) 3<br />

DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 3/7/12<br />

NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />

STANDARD 1 STANDARD 2 STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />

1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />

1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />

1.<br />

2.<br />

3.<br />

4.<br />

5.<br />

6.<br />

STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />

ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />

EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />

ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />

TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />

QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />

4<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

4<br />

N/<br />

7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />

THIS PROGRAM IS BEAUTIFUL AND REALLY MAKED THE STUDENTS<br />

THINK.<br />

8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />

NONE<br />

9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />

NONE<br />

1.<br />

2.<br />

3.<br />

4.<br />

5.<br />

6.<br />

STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />

ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />

EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />

ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />

TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />

QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />

MR. SMITH WAS FRIENDLY AND ENTERTAINING. HE RELATED WELL<br />

TO THE CHILDREN.<br />

8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />

NONE<br />

9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />

HE MAINTAINED EXCELLENT CONTROL AND WAS THOROUGHLY<br />

ENGAGING.<br />

Arts in Education Service - School Evaluations <strong>2011</strong>-<strong>2012</strong><br />

Page 51 of 332


ARTIST: CHARLES R. SMITH, JR.<br />

CONTRACT #: A8414<br />

TITLE OF PROGRAM: AUTHOR VISIT - POETRY PUT TO WORK<br />

TYPE OF PROGRAM: ASSEMBLY<br />

DISTRICT/ SCHOOL: SOMERS/SOMERS MIDDLE SCHOOL<br />

# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />

# OF STUDENTS: GRADE(S) 6<br />

DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 3/12/12<br />

NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />

STANDARD 1 STANDARD 2 STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />

ARTIST: CHILDREN'S THEATRE CENTER OF NJ d<br />

CONTRACT #: A7993<br />

TITLE OF PROGRAM: ARITHMETICKLES<br />

TYPE OF PROGRAM: ASSEMBLY<br />

DISTRICT/ SCHOOL:<br />

# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />

PELHAM/SIWANOY ELEM.<br />

# OF STUDENTS: 300 GRADE(S) K-5<br />

DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 1/18/12<br />

NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />

STANDARD 1 STANDARD 2 STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />

1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />

1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />

1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />

2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />

3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />

4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />

5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />

6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />

2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />

3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />

4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />

5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />

6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />

4<br />

2<br />

3<br />

3<br />

3<br />

N/<br />

7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />

CHARLES' BOOKS ARE FANTASTIC AND HIS PRESENTATION IS<br />

ENGAGING. HIS VISUALS KEPT STUDENTS INTERESTED. THEY<br />

LOVES HEARING HIM RECITE HIS POEMS.<br />

8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />

NONE<br />

9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />

NONE<br />

7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM?<br />

I FELT THIS WAS MORE SHOW LESS MATH.<br />

8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />

WATCH TONE WITH CHILDREN.<br />

9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />

NONE<br />

N<br />

WHY?<br />

ARTIST: CHILDREN'S THEATRE CENTER OF NJ d<br />

CONTRACT #: A7585<br />

TITLE OF PROGRAM: ARITHMETICKLES<br />

TYPE OF PROGRAM: ASSEMBLY<br />

DISTRICT/ SCHOOL: KATONAH/LEWISBORO/KATONAH ELEM. SCHOOL<br />

# OF TEACHERS: 4<br />

# OF STUDENTS: 170 GRADE(S) 4 & 5<br />

DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 1/10/12<br />

NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />

STANDARD 1 STANDARD 2 STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />

ARTIST: CHILDREN'S THEATRE CENTER OF NJ d<br />

CONTRACT #: A7730<br />

TITLE OF PROGRAM: ARITHMETICKLES<br />

TYPE OF PROGRAM: ASSEMBLY<br />

DISTRICT/ SCHOOL: EASTCHESTER/EASTCHESTER MIDDLE SCHOOL<br />

# OF TEACHERS: 10 # OF STUDENTS: 240 GRADE(S) 6<br />

DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 10/28/11<br />

NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />

STANDARD 1 STANDARD 2 STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />

1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />

1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />

1.<br />

2.<br />

3.<br />

4.<br />

5.<br />

6.<br />

STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />

ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />

EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />

ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />

TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />

QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />

5<br />

4<br />

3<br />

5<br />

5<br />

N/<br />

7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />

VERY ENGAGING. STUDENTS ENJOYED BEING PART OF THE SKITS.<br />

DEMONSTRATED THAT LISTENING AND FOLLOWING PATTERNS<br />

SEQUENCES IS IMPORTANT.<br />

8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />

NONE<br />

9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />

A GREAT RAPPORT WITH STUDENTS. SEEMED VERY EXPERIENCED.<br />

1.<br />

2.<br />

3.<br />

4.<br />

5.<br />

6.<br />

STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />

ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />

EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />

ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />

TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />

QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />

AS USUAL, ARITHMETICKLES PUTS ON A GREAT SHOW. THE<br />

STUDENTS REALLY ENJOY THE SHOW AND LOVE PARTICIPATING IN<br />

IT.<br />

8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />

NONE<br />

9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />

NONE<br />

Arts in Education Service - School Evaluations <strong>2011</strong>-<strong>2012</strong><br />

Page 52 of 332


ARTIST: CHILD'S PLAY TOURING THEATRE CONTRACT #: A8098<br />

TITLE OF PROGRAM: NEW VOICES<br />

TYPE OF PROGRAM: ASSEMBLY<br />

DISTRICT/ SCHOOL: LAKELAND/BENJAMIN FRANKLIN ELEM.<br />

# OF TEACHERS: 2<br />

# OF STUDENTS: 600 GRADE(S) K-5<br />

DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 12/9/11<br />

NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />

STANDARD 1 STANDARD 2 STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />

ARTIST: CHILD'S PLAY TOURING THEATRE CONTRACT #: A7932<br />

TITLE OF PROGRAM: NEW VOICES<br />

TYPE OF PROGRAM: ASSEMBLY<br />

DISTRICT/ SCHOOL: PLEASANTVILLE/BEDFORD ROAD ELEM.<br />

# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />

# OF STUDENTS: 640 GRADE(S) 1-4<br />

DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 3/27/12<br />

NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />

STANDARD 1 STANDARD 2 STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />

1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />

1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />

1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />

2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />

3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />

4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />

5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />

6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />

2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />

3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />

4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />

5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />

6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

N/<br />

7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />

WE LOVE TO SEE STUDENTS GET EXCITED ABOUT WRITING<br />

STORIES THAT MAY BE CHOSEN TO BE PERFORMED.<br />

8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />

NONE<br />

9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />

NONE<br />

7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM?<br />

WONDERFUL.<br />

8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />

NONE<br />

9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />

NONE<br />

Y<br />

WHY?<br />

ARTIST: CHILD'S PLAY TOURING THEATRE CONTRACT #: A7672<br />

TITLE OF PROGRAM: NEW VOICES<br />

TYPE OF PROGRAM: ASSEMBLY<br />

DISTRICT/ SCHOOL:<br />

# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />

BREWSTER/JFK ELEM.<br />

# OF STUDENTS: 500 GRADE(S) K-3<br />

DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 5/31/12<br />

NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />

STANDARD 1 STANDARD 2 STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />

ARTIST: CHILD'S PLAY TOURING THEATRE CONTRACT #: A7812<br />

TITLE OF PROGRAM: NEW VOICES<br />

TYPE OF PROGRAM: ASSEMBLY<br />

DISTRICT/ SCHOOL: CHAPPAQUA/WESTORCHARD ELEM.<br />

# OF TEACHERS: 5<br />

# OF STUDENTS: 515 GRADE(S) K-4<br />

DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 5/29/12<br />

NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />

STANDARD 1 STANDARD 2 STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />

1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />

1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />

1.<br />

2.<br />

3.<br />

4.<br />

5.<br />

6.<br />

STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />

ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />

EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />

ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />

TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />

QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />

GREAT PROGRAM. LOTS OF FUN AND THE CHILDREN REALLY LOVE<br />

IT. AWESOME IN ALL ASPECTS.<br />

8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />

NONE<br />

9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />

NONE<br />

1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />

2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />

3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />

4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />

5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />

6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />

7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />

NONE<br />

8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />

NONE<br />

9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />

NONE<br />

4<br />

4<br />

4<br />

5<br />

4<br />

N/<br />

Arts in Education Service - School Evaluations <strong>2011</strong>-<strong>2012</strong><br />

Page 53 of 332


ARTIST: CHILD'S PLAY TOURING THEATRE CONTRACT #: A8152<br />

TITLE OF PROGRAM: NEW VOICES<br />

TYPE OF PROGRAM: ASSEMBLY<br />

DISTRICT/ SCHOOL: LAKELAND/BENJAMIN FRANKLIN ELEM.<br />

# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />

# OF STUDENTS: GRADE(S) K-5<br />

DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 3/28/12<br />

NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />

STANDARD 1 STANDARD 2 STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />

ARTIST: CHILD'S PLAY TOURING THEATRE CONTRACT #: A8818<br />

TITLE OF PROGRAM: NEW VOICES<br />

TYPE OF PROGRAM: ASSEMBLY<br />

DISTRICT/ SCHOOL: KATONAH/LEWISBORO/LEWISBORO ELEM.<br />

# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />

# OF STUDENTS: 400 GRADE(S) K-5<br />

DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 5/17/12<br />

NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />

STANDARD 1 STANDARD 2 STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />

1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />

1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />

1.<br />

2.<br />

3.<br />

4.<br />

5.<br />

6.<br />

STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />

ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />

EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />

ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />

TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />

QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />

MOTIVATING EXPERIENCE FOR ALL STUDENTS. STUDENTS WERE<br />

ENGAGED AND EXCITED. THE PERFORMERS WERE ENERGETIC<br />

AND FUN. THE BEST PART WAS THE ANTICIPATION OF WHOSE<br />

STORY WOULD BE SELECTED.<br />

8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />

NONE<br />

9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />

WE LOVED THIS PROGRAM.<br />

ARTIST: CHINESE LANGUAGE PROGRAM, INC. CONTRACT #: A7758<br />

TITLE OF PROGRAM: JING QUI LUO - CHINESE CULTURE & ART<br />

TYPE OF PROGRAM: WORKSHOP<br />

DISTRICT/ SCHOOL:<br />

EASTCHESTER/WAVERLY EARLY CHILDHOOD CTR<br />

# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />

# OF STUDENTS: 9 GRADE(S) 1<br />

DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE<br />

10/12/11-1/11/12<br />

NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />

STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 X STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4 X<br />

1.<br />

2.<br />

3.<br />

4.<br />

5.<br />

6.<br />

STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />

ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />

EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />

ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />

TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />

QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />

THE RECOGNITION OF STUDENTS FOR THEIR WRITING, AS WELL AS<br />

THE PERFORMANCE OF 3 STORIES BY OUR STUDENTS, MADE THIS<br />

ASEMBLY SPECIAL.<br />

8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />

NONE<br />

9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />

I CAN'T WAIT TILL NEXT YEAR.<br />

ARTIST: CHLOE PERRET<br />

CONTRACT #: A8722<br />

TITLE OF PROGRAM: CELLO PLAYER FOR THE SHOW - GUYS & DOLLS<br />

TYPE OF PROGRAM: ASSEMBLY<br />

DISTRICT/ SCHOOL:<br />

KATONAH/LEWISBORO/JOHN JAY HIGH SCHOOL<br />

# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />

# OF STUDENTS: 150 GRADE(S) 9-12<br />

DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 3/22-24/12<br />

NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />

STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 STANDARD 3 STANDARD 4<br />

1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />

1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />

1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />

2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />

3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />

4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />

5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />

6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />

7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />

TEACHING CHILDREN ABOUT A NEW CULTURE AND A NEW<br />

LANGUAGE IS HARD, BUT SHE TAUGHT THE CHILDREN IN A FUN<br />

AND ENGAGING WAY. THE CHILDREN LEARNED A LOT.<br />

8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />

NONE<br />

9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />

NONE<br />

4<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />

2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />

3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />

4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />

5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />

6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />

7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />

NONE<br />

8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />

NONE<br />

9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />

NONE<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

Arts in Education Service - School Evaluations <strong>2011</strong>-<strong>2012</strong><br />

Page 54 of 332


ARTIST: CHRIS MELITO<br />

CONTRACT #: A8528<br />

TITLE OF PROGRAM: TRUMPET PLAYER FOR THE SHOW - ONCE UPON A<br />

MATTRESS<br />

TYPE OF PROGRAM: ASSEMBLY<br />

DISTRICT/ SCHOOL:<br />

# OF TEACHERS: 2<br />

SOMERS/SOMERS HIGH SCHOOL<br />

# OF STUDENTS: 50 GRADE(S) 9-12<br />

DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 3/12-18/12<br />

NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />

STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 STANDARD 3 STANDARD 4<br />

1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />

ARTIST: CHRISTA NAPOLITANO<br />

CONTRACT #: A7939<br />

TITLE OF PROGRAM: HIP HOP<br />

TYPE OF PROGRAM: WORKSHOP<br />

DISTRICT/ SCHOOL: EASTCHESTER/EASTCHESTER HIGH SCHOOL<br />

# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />

# OF STUDENTS: GRADE(S) 9-12<br />

DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 11/4/11-1/20/12<br />

NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />

STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 X STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4 X<br />

1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />

1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />

2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />

3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />

4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />

5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />

6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />

7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />

NONE<br />

8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />

NONE<br />

9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />

NONE<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />

2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />

3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />

4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />

5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />

6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />

7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />

NONE<br />

8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />

NONE<br />

9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />

CHRISTA IS WONDERFUL AND THE STUDENTS LOVED HER. SHE IS<br />

ALWAYS CREATIVE AND PRODUCES EXCITING AND GREAT PIECES.<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

ARTIST: CHRISTIAN ANDERSON<br />

CONTRACT #: A8860<br />

TITLE OF PROGRAM: UNDER THE SEA SONGS & DANCES<br />

TYPE OF PROGRAM: ASSEMBLY<br />

DISTRICT/ SCHOOL:<br />

# OF TEACHERS: 3<br />

PELHAM/HUTCHINSON ELEM.<br />

# OF STUDENTS: 340 GRADE(S) K-5<br />

DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 6/5/12<br />

NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />

STANDARD 1 STANDARD 2 STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />

ARTIST: CHRISTINE ECKLER<br />

CONTRACT #: A8284<br />

TITLE OF PROGRAM: DESIGNING SCULPEY JEWELRY<br />

TYPE OF PROGRAM: WORKSHOP<br />

DISTRICT/ SCHOOL: KATONAH/LEWISBORO/KATONAH ELEM. SCHOOL<br />

# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />

# OF STUDENTS: 7 GRADE(S) 3-5<br />

DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 1/23-3/18/12<br />

NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />

STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 X STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />

1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />

1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />

1.<br />

2.<br />

3.<br />

4.<br />

5.<br />

6.<br />

STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />

ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />

EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />

ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />

TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />

QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />

THIS WAS A WONDERFUL EXPERIENCE. THEY PERFORMED 3 MINI<br />

PLAYS. THEY WERE INFORMATIVE AND FUN FOR THE STUDENTS.<br />

8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />

NONE<br />

9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />

WE LOOK FORWARD TO HAVING HIM AGAIN.<br />

1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />

2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />

3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />

4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />

5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />

6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />

7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />

CHRISTINE IS A FAVORITE TEACHER.<br />

8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />

NONE<br />

9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />

NONE<br />

4<br />

4<br />

4<br />

4<br />

4<br />

4<br />

Arts in Education Service - School Evaluations <strong>2011</strong>-<strong>2012</strong><br />

Page 55 of 332


ARTIST: CHRISTINE ECKLER<br />

CONTRACT #: A7555<br />

TITLE OF PROGRAM: DESIGNING SCULPEY JEWELRY<br />

TYPE OF PROGRAM: RESIDENCY<br />

DISTRICT/ SCHOOL: KATONAH/LEWISBORO/KATONAH ELEM. SCHOOL<br />

# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />

# OF STUDENTS: 9 GRADE(S) K-2<br />

DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 9/28-11/30/11<br />

NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />

STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 X STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />

1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />

ARTIST: CHRISTOPHER GRECO<br />

CONTRACT #: A7534<br />

TITLE OF PROGRAM: SOUND DESIGNER FOR THE SHOW - THE DROWSY<br />

CHAPERONE<br />

TYPE OF PROGRAM: RESIDENCY<br />

DISTRICT/ SCHOOL: CHAPPAQUA/HORACE GREELEY HIGH SCHOOL<br />

# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />

# OF STUDENTS: GRADE(S) 9-12<br />

DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 11/11-19/11<br />

NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />

STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 X STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />

1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />

1.<br />

2.<br />

3.<br />

4.<br />

5.<br />

6.<br />

STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />

ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />

EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />

ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />

TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />

QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />

SHE IS WELL LIKED BY THE STUDENTS AND A VALUABLE ARTIST.<br />

8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />

NONE<br />

9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />

NONE<br />

1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />

2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />

3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />

4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />

5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />

6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />

7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />

CHRIS IS A GREAT DESIGNER AND GREAT WITH THE STUDENTS.<br />

8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />

NONE<br />

9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />

I LOOK FORWARD TO HAVING HIM AGAIN.<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

ARTIST: CHRISTOPHER McINERNEY<br />

CONTRACT #: A8838<br />

TITLE OF PROGRAM: LIGHTING DESIGNER FOR SPRING CONCERT<br />

TYPE OF PROGRAM: RESIDENCY<br />

DISTRICT/ SCHOOL: KATONAH/LEWISBORO/JOHN JAY HIGH SCHOOL<br />

# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />

# OF STUDENTS: 450 GRADE(S) 9-12<br />

DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 5/23-6/4/12<br />

NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />

STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 X STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />

ARTIST: CHRISTOPHER McINERNEY<br />

CONTRACT #: A8162<br />

TITLE OF PROGRAM: LIGHTING DESIGNER FOR WINTER CONCERT<br />

TYPE OF PROGRAM: RESIDENCY<br />

DISTRICT/ SCHOOL: KATONAH/LEWISBORO/JOHN JAY HIGH SCHOOL<br />

# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />

# OF STUDENTS: 400 GRADE(S) 9-12<br />

DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 1/9-30/12<br />

NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />

STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 X STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4 X<br />

1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />

1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />

1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />

2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />

3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />

4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />

5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />

6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />

2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />

3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />

4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />

5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />

6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM?<br />

NONE<br />

Y<br />

WHY?<br />

7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM?<br />

NONE<br />

Y<br />

WHY?<br />

8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />

NONE<br />

9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />

NONE<br />

8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />

NONE<br />

9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />

NONE<br />

Arts in Education Service - School Evaluations <strong>2011</strong>-<strong>2012</strong><br />

Page 56 of 332


ARTIST: CHRISTOPHER STELLUTI<br />

CONTRACT #: A8430<br />

TITLE OF PROGRAM: SAX & CLARINET PLAYER FOR THE SHOW - THE<br />

DROWSY CHAPERONE<br />

TYPE OF PROGRAM: ASSEMBLY<br />

DISTRICT/ SCHOOL: KATONAH/LEWISBORO/JOHN JAY MIDDLE SCHOOL<br />

# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />

# OF STUDENTS: 75 GRADE(S) 6-8<br />

DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 3/3-17/12<br />

NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />

STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 STANDARD 3 STANDARD 4<br />

ARTIST: CHRISTOPHER TABORSKY<br />

CONTRACT #: A7934<br />

TITLE OF PROGRAM: TRUMPET PLAYER FOR THE SHOW - ANNIE GET<br />

YOUR GUN<br />

TYPE OF PROGRAM: ASSEMBLY<br />

DISTRICT/ SCHOOL: LAKELAND/WALTER PANAS HIGH SCHOOL<br />

# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />

# OF STUDENTS: 100 GRADE(S) 9-12<br />

DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 11/15-19/11<br />

NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />

STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 STANDARD 3 STANDARD 4<br />

1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />

1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />

1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />

2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />

3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />

4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />

5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />

6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

N/<br />

1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />

2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />

3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />

4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />

5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />

6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM?<br />

THE ORCHESTRA PIT WAS AWESOME.<br />

Y<br />

WHY?<br />

7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM?<br />

NONE<br />

Y<br />

WHY?<br />

8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />

NONE<br />

9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />

NONE<br />

8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />

NONE<br />

9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />

NONE<br />

ARTIST: CHRISTOPHER TABORSKY<br />

CONTRACT #: A8332<br />

TITLE OF PROGRAM: TRUMPET PLAYER FOR THE SHOW - MY FAIR LADY<br />

TYPE OF PROGRAM: ASSEMBLY<br />

DISTRICT/ SCHOOL: LAKELAND/WALTER PANAS HIGH SCHOOL<br />

# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />

# OF STUDENTS: 200 GRADE(S) 9-12<br />

DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 4/30-5/5/12<br />

NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />

STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 STANDARD 3 STANDARD 4<br />

ARTIST: CINDY FINEGAN<br />

CONTRACT #: A7642A<br />

TITLE OF PROGRAM: BROADWAY KIDS ON STAGE<br />

TYPE OF PROGRAM: WORKSHOP<br />

DISTRICT/ SCHOOL:<br />

# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />

PELHAM/SIWANOY ELEM.<br />

# OF STUDENTS: 9 GRADE(S) 3-5<br />

DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 10/4-11/29/11<br />

NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />

STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 X STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />

1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />

1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />

1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />

2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />

3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />

4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />

5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />

6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />

2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />

3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />

4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />

5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />

6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM?<br />

NONE<br />

Y<br />

WHY?<br />

7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM?<br />

THE STUDENTS WERE REALLY INTO IT.<br />

Y<br />

WHY?<br />

8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />

NONE<br />

9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />

NONE<br />

8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />

NONE<br />

9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />

NONE<br />

Arts in Education Service - School Evaluations <strong>2011</strong>-<strong>2012</strong><br />

Page 57 of 332


ARTIST: CINDY FINEGAN<br />

CONTRACT #: A8356B<br />

TITLE OF PROGRAM: BROADWAY KIDS ON STAGE<br />

TYPE OF PROGRAM: WORKSHOP<br />

DISTRICT/ SCHOOL:<br />

# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />

PELHAM/SIWANOY ELEM.<br />

# OF STUDENTS: 8 GRADE(S) 3-5<br />

DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 2/1-4/4/12<br />

NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />

STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 X STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />

ARTIST: CINDY FINEGAN<br />

CONTRACT #: A8356A<br />

TITLE OF PROGRAM: COME ALIVE THEATRE<br />

TYPE OF PROGRAM: WORKSHOP<br />

DISTRICT/ SCHOOL:<br />

# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />

PELHAM/SIWANOY ELEM.<br />

# OF STUDENTS: 9 GRADE(S) 1 & 2<br />

DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 1/30-3/26/12<br />

NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />

STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 X STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />

1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />

1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />

1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />

2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />

3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />

4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />

5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />

6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />

7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />

THE STUDENTS LOVED IT. THEY GOT TO PERFORM IN A SCHOOL<br />

WIDE SHOW AT THE END OF THE CLASS.<br />

8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />

NONE<br />

9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />

NONE<br />

4<br />

4<br />

4<br />

4<br />

4<br />

N/<br />

1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />

2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />

3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />

4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />

5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />

6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />

7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />

NONE<br />

8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />

NONE<br />

9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />

NONE<br />

4<br />

4<br />

4<br />

4<br />

4<br />

4<br />

ARTIST: CINDY FINEGAN<br />

CONTRACT #: A8054A<br />

TITLE OF PROGRAM: CULTURAL HISTORY & TRADITIONAL GAMES<br />

TYPE OF PROGRAM: WORKSHOP<br />

DISTRICT/ SCHOOL:<br />

# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />

PELHAM/PROSPECT HILL ELEM.<br />

# OF STUDENTS: 10 GRADE(S) 2-5<br />

DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 1/10-3/6/12<br />

NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />

STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 X STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4 X<br />

ARTIST: CINDY FINEGAN<br />

CONTRACT #: A7622A<br />

TITLE OF PROGRAM: INTRO TO MUSICAL THEATRE<br />

TYPE OF PROGRAM: WORKSHOP<br />

DISTRICT/ SCHOOL:<br />

# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />

PELHAM/HUTCHINSON ELEM.<br />

# OF STUDENTS: 8 GRADE(S) 1 & 2<br />

DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 10/14-12/9/11<br />

NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />

STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 X STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />

1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />

1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />

1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />

2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />

3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />

4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />

5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />

6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

N/<br />

1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />

2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />

3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />

4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />

5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />

6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM?<br />

NONE<br />

Y<br />

WHY?<br />

7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM?<br />

CINDY IS A PLEASURE TO WORK WITH.<br />

Y<br />

WHY?<br />

8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />

NONE<br />

9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />

NONE<br />

8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />

NONE<br />

9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />

NONE<br />

Arts in Education Service - School Evaluations <strong>2011</strong>-<strong>2012</strong><br />

Page 58 of 332


ARTIST: CINDY FINEGAN<br />

CONTRACT #: A8753<br />

TITLE OF PROGRAM: MUSICAL THEATRE - KIDS ON STAGE<br />

TYPE OF PROGRAM: WORKSHOP<br />

DISTRICT/ SCHOOL:<br />

# OF TEACHERS: 2<br />

PELHAM/SIWANOY ELEM.<br />

# OF STUDENTS: 48 GRADE(S) 1<br />

DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 3/26-5/15/12<br />

NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />

STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 X STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />

ARTIST: CINDY FINEGAN<br />

CONTRACT #: A8054B<br />

TITLE OF PROGRAM: ROCKETTES<br />

TYPE OF PROGRAM: WORKSHOP<br />

DISTRICT/ SCHOOL:<br />

# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />

PELHAM/PROSPECT HILL ELEM.<br />

# OF STUDENTS: 11 GRADE(S) 2-5<br />

DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 1/12-3/8/12<br />

NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />

STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 X STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4 X<br />

1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />

1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />

1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />

2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />

3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />

4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />

5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />

6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />

5<br />

4<br />

4<br />

5<br />

4<br />

5<br />

1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />

2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />

3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />

4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />

5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />

6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

N/<br />

7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM?<br />

NONE<br />

Y<br />

WHY?<br />

7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM?<br />

NONE<br />

Y<br />

WHY?<br />

8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />

NONE<br />

9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />

NONE<br />

8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />

NONE<br />

9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />

NONE<br />

ARTIST: CINDY FINEGAN<br />

CONTRACT #: A7642B<br />

TITLE OF PROGRAM: STORY TIME<br />

TYPE OF PROGRAM: WORKSHOP<br />

DISTRICT/ SCHOOL:<br />

# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />

PELHAM/SIWANOY ELEM.<br />

# OF STUDENTS: 9 GRADE(S) 3-5<br />

DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 10/6-12/1/11<br />

NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />

STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 X STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />

ARTIST: CIRCUS ARTS CAMP<br />

CONTRACT #: A8791<br />

TITLE OF PROGRAM: CHRISTIANE GLOVE - CIRCUS ARTS SKILLS<br />

TYPE OF PROGRAM: ASSEMBLY<br />

DISTRICT/ SCHOOL: NEW ROCHELLE/TRINITY ELEM. SCHOOL<br />

# OF TEACHERS: 5<br />

# OF STUDENTS: 860 GRADE(S) K-5<br />

DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 5/18/12<br />

NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />

STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />

1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />

1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />

1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />

2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />

3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />

4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />

5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />

6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />

7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />

NONE<br />

8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />

NONE<br />

9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />

NONE<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

N/<br />

1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />

2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />

3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />

4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />

5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />

6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />

7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />

CIRCUS ARTS PEOPLE WERE FANTASTIC, PATIENT, SUPPORTIVE<br />

AND EXPLAINED EVERYTHING TO STUDENTS ON THEIR LEVEL.<br />

8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />

NONE<br />

9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />

NONE<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

N/<br />

Arts in Education Service - School Evaluations <strong>2011</strong>-<strong>2012</strong><br />

Page 59 of 332


ARTIST: CIRQUE DU JOUR<br />

CONTRACT #: A8638<br />

TITLE OF PROGRAM: CHRIS ALLISON - CIRCUS SKILLS & SHOW<br />

TYPE OF PROGRAM: ASSEMBLY/WORKSHOP<br />

DISTRICT/ SCHOOL:<br />

# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />

TUCKAHOE/W. E. COTTLE ELEM.<br />

# OF STUDENTS: 74 GRADE(S) K-5<br />

DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 3/29-30/12<br />

NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />

STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 X STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />

ARTIST: CLASS ACT PERFORMING ARTISTS & S CONTRACT #: A8218<br />

TITLE OF PROGRAM: BALLET FOLKLORICO MEXICO<br />

TYPE OF PROGRAM: ASSEMBLY<br />

DISTRICT/ SCHOOL: CHAPPAQUA/SEVEN BRIDGES MIDDLE SCHOOL<br />

# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />

# OF STUDENTS: 150 GRADE(S) 5<br />

DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 5/4/12<br />

NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />

STANDARD 1 STANDARD 2 STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4 X<br />

1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />

1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />

1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />

2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />

3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />

4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />

5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />

6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />

7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />

THE WHOLE SCHOOL LOOKS FORWARD TO THIS SHOW.<br />

8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />

NONE<br />

9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />

GREAT, GREAT SHOW.<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

1.<br />

2.<br />

3.<br />

4.<br />

5.<br />

6.<br />

STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />

ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />

EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />

ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />

TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />

QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />

PERFECT COMBINATION OF DANCE (AMAZING COSTUMES)<br />

LECTURE, Q & A. STUDENTS WERE ENTRANCED AND HAD LOTS OF<br />

QUESTIONS.<br />

8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />

NONE<br />

9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />

NONE<br />

ARTIST: CLASS ACT PERFORMING ARTISTS & S CONTRACT #: A7801<br />

TITLE OF PROGRAM: BALLET FOLKLORICO MEXICO<br />

TYPE OF PROGRAM: ASSEMBLY<br />

DISTRICT/ SCHOOL:<br />

# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />

LAKELAND/VAN CORT ELEM.<br />

# OF STUDENTS: 660 GRADE(S) K-5<br />

DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 5/3/12<br />

NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />

STANDARD 1 STANDARD 2 STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4 X<br />

ARTIST: CLASS ACT PERFORMING ARTISTS & S CONTRACT #: A7741<br />

TITLE OF PROGRAM: BARYNYA RUSSIAN DANCERS<br />

TYPE OF PROGRAM: ASSEMBLY<br />

DISTRICT/ SCHOOL:<br />

# OF TEACHERS: 5<br />

CHAPPAQUA/GRAFFLIN ELEM.<br />

# OF STUDENTS: 110 GRADE(S) K-4<br />

DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 1/13/12<br />

NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />

STANDARD 1 STANDARD 2 STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4 X<br />

1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />

1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />

1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />

2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />

3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />

4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />

5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />

6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />

2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />

3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />

4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />

5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />

6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />

3<br />

4<br />

2<br />

2<br />

1<br />

N/<br />

7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />

THEY WERE AMAZING. THE DANCING AND MUSIC WERE GREAT.<br />

ALL OF OUR STUDENTS WERE ENGAGED THROUGHTOUT AND<br />

LEARNED A LOT ABOUT MEXICIAN CULTURE.<br />

8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />

NONE<br />

9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />

GREAT SHOW.<br />

7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM?<br />

WAS REALLY DIFFICULT TO UNDERSTAND.<br />

8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />

NONE<br />

9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />

NONE<br />

N<br />

WHY?<br />

Arts in Education Service - School Evaluations <strong>2011</strong>-<strong>2012</strong><br />

Page 60 of 332


ARTIST: CLASS ACT PERFORMING ARTISTS & S<br />

CONTRACT #: A7741<br />

TITLE OF PROGRAM: BARYNYA RUSSIAN DANCERS<br />

TYPE OF PROGRAM: ASSEMBLY<br />

DISTRICT/ SCHOOL:<br />

# OF TEACHERS: 5<br />

CHAPPAQUA/GRAFFLIN ELEM.<br />

# OF STUDENTS: 106 GRADE(S) K-4<br />

DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 1/13/12<br />

NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />

STANDARD 1 STANDARD 2 STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4 X<br />

ARTIST: CLASS ACT PERFORMING ARTISTS & S CONTRACT #: A7741<br />

TITLE OF PROGRAM: BARYNYA RUSSIAN DANCERS<br />

TYPE OF PROGRAM: ASSEMBLY<br />

DISTRICT/ SCHOOL:<br />

# OF TEACHERS: 5<br />

CHAPPAQUA/GRAFFLIN ELEM.<br />

# OF STUDENTS: 260 GRADE(S) K-4<br />

DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 1/13/12<br />

NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />

STANDARD 1 STANDARD 2 STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4 X<br />

1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />

1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />

1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />

2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />

3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />

4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />

5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />

6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />

7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />

STUDENTS WERE ACTIVELY ENGAGED.<br />

8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />

IT WAS DIFFICULT TO UNDERSTAND THE SPEAKER. THIS MADE IT<br />

DIFFICULT FOR STUDENTS TO HEAR THE BACKGROUND<br />

INFORMATION FOR EACH DANCE.<br />

9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />

NONE<br />

ARTIST: CLASS ACT PERFORMING ARTISTS & S CONTRACT #: A7741<br />

TITLE OF PROGRAM: BARYNYA RUSSIAN DANCERS<br />

TYPE OF PROGRAM: ASSEMBLY<br />

DISTRICT/ SCHOOL:<br />

CHAPPAQUA/GRAFFLIN ELEM.<br />

# OF TEACHERS: 4<br />

# OF STUDENTS: GRADE(S) K-4<br />

DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE<br />

1/13/12<br />

NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />

STANDARD 1 STANDARD 2 STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4 X<br />

4<br />

4<br />

2<br />

4<br />

2<br />

N/<br />

1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />

2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />

3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />

4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />

5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />

6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />

7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />

NONE<br />

8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />

YOU NEED A BETTER SOUND SYSTEM. IT WAS DIFFICULT TO HEAR.<br />

9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />

THE CHILDREN ENJOYED IT.<br />

ARTIST: CLASS ACT PERFORMING ARTISTS & S CONTRACT #: A7782<br />

TITLE OF PROGRAM: BARYNYA RUSSIAN DANCERS<br />

TYPE OF PROGRAM: ASSEMBLY<br />

DISTRICT/ SCHOOL: CHAPPAQUA/ROARING BROOK ELEM.<br />

# OF TEACHERS: 3<br />

# OF STUDENTS: 450 GRADE(S) K-4<br />

DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 1/13/12<br />

NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />

STANDARD 1 STANDARD 2 STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4 X<br />

5<br />

4<br />

3<br />

4<br />

2<br />

N/<br />

1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />

1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />

1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />

2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />

3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />

4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />

5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />

6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />

7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />

THE ARTISTRY WAS VERY GOOD AND THE STUDENTS LOVED THE<br />

DANCING IN PARTICULAR.<br />

8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />

THE ACOUSTICS WERE NOT VERY GOOD AND IT WAS DIFFICULT TO<br />

UNDERSTAND THE MAIN SPEAKER.<br />

9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />

NONE<br />

4<br />

4<br />

3<br />

2<br />

2<br />

N/<br />

1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />

2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />

3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />

4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />

5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />

6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />

7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? N WHY?<br />

WHILE THE TROOP WAS COMPRISED OF ACCOMPLISHED<br />

MUSICIANS AND THE MUSIC/DANCE WAS ENTERTAINING, THE<br />

CULTURAL MESSAGE WAS NOT CLEARLY DELIVERED.<br />

4<br />

3<br />

2<br />

2<br />

2<br />

N/<br />

8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />

THE PROGRAM WOULD HAVE BENEFITTED FROM A MORE<br />

COMPREHENSIVE SCRIPT ABOUT THE VARIOUS TYPES OF RUSSIAN<br />

DANCE, MUSIC AND CULTURE. I ALSO THINK THEY WOULD APPEAL<br />

TO A WIDER AUDIENCE IF THEY INCLUDED A FEMALE PERFORMER<br />

AS WELL.<br />

9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />

THE CHILDREN REALLY ENJOYED THE DANCE AND MUSIC<br />

ESPECIALLY AT THE END WHEN THEY WERE ASKED TO GET UP<br />

AND DANCE.<br />

Arts in Education Service - School Evaluations <strong>2011</strong>-<strong>2012</strong><br />

Page 61 of 332


ARTIST: CLASS ACT PERFORMING ARTISTS & S<br />

CONTRACT #: A7741<br />

TITLE OF PROGRAM: BARYNYA RUSSIAN DANCERS<br />

TYPE OF PROGRAM: ASSEMBLY<br />

DISTRICT/ SCHOOL:<br />

# OF TEACHERS: 5<br />

CHAPPAQUA/GRAFFLIN ELEM.<br />

# OF STUDENTS: 125 GRADE(S) K-4<br />

DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 1/13/12<br />

NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />

STANDARD 1 STANDARD 2 STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4 X<br />

ARTIST: CLASS ACT PERFORMING ARTISTS & S CONTRACT #: A7699<br />

TITLE OF PROGRAM: THE ROPE WARRIOR<br />

TYPE OF PROGRAM: ASSEMBLY<br />

DISTRICT/ SCHOOL:<br />

# OF TEACHERS: 15<br />

CHAPPAQUA/GRAFFLIN ELEM.<br />

# OF STUDENTS: 100 GRADE(S) K-4<br />

DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 6/18/12<br />

NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />

STANDARD 1 STANDARD 2 STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />

1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />

1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />

1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />

2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />

3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />

4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />

5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />

6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />

2<br />

3<br />

2<br />

2.5<br />

2.5<br />

N/<br />

1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />

2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />

3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />

4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />

5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />

6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />

5<br />

4<br />

3.5<br />

4.7<br />

4.7<br />

N/<br />

7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM?<br />

IT DID NOT HAVE ENOUGH EDUCATIONAL VALUE.<br />

N<br />

WHY?<br />

7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />

CHILDREN LOVED THE PROGRAM AND IT INSPIRED THEM.<br />

8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />

MORE INTERACTION. MORE DANCING. MUSICIANS SHOULD BE<br />

CLOSER TO AUDIENCE. MORE ABOUT RUSSIA.<br />

9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />

THERE'S POTENTIAL HERE IF THERE WAS SOME INFORMATION<br />

ABOUT RUSSIA INCORPORATED INTO PROGRAM AND MORE<br />

DANCING.<br />

8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />

NONE<br />

9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />

PLEASE BRING THEM BACK.<br />

ARTIST: CLAUDE PREECE<br />

CONTRACT #: A8580<br />

TITLE OF PROGRAM: BASS PLAYER FOR THE SHOW - SUGAR<br />

TYPE OF PROGRAM: ASSEMBLY<br />

DISTRICT/ SCHOOL: BRIARCLIFF/BRIARCLIFF HIGH SCHOOL<br />

# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />

# OF STUDENTS: GRADE(S) 9-12<br />

DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 3/4-11/12<br />

NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />

STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />

ARTIST: CLAUDIA STEINBERG<br />

CONTRACT #: A7979<br />

TITLE OF PROGRAM: ART OF MAPMAKING<br />

TYPE OF PROGRAM: RESIDENCY<br />

DISTRICT/ SCHOOL: IRVINGTON/MAIN STREET SCHOOL<br />

# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />

# OF STUDENTS: 130 GRADE(S) 4<br />

DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 11/18/11-1/20/12<br />

NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />

STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 X STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />

1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />

1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />

1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />

2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />

3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />

4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />

5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />

6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />

2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />

3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />

4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />

5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />

6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM?<br />

GREAT SHOW<br />

8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />

NONE<br />

9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />

NONE<br />

Y<br />

WHY?<br />

7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />

WE HAVE PARTICIPATED IN THIS PROGRAM FOR 3 YEARS AND<br />

EACH AND EVERY YEAR WE ARE AMAZED AT THE WORK THE<br />

STUDENTS DO.<br />

8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />

NONE<br />

9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />

THANK YOU AGAIN CLAUDIA.<br />

Arts in Education Service - School Evaluations <strong>2011</strong>-<strong>2012</strong><br />

Page 62 of 332


ARTIST: CLAUDIA STEINBERG<br />

CONTRACT #: A8830<br />

TITLE OF PROGRAM: PUPPETS - THE GREEK GODS<br />

TYPE OF PROGRAM: WORKSHOP<br />

DISTRICT/ SCHOOL: HASTINGS/FARRAGUT MIDDLE SCHOOL<br />

# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />

# OF STUDENTS: 125 GRADE(S) 6<br />

DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 5/3-6/6/12<br />

NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />

STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 X STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4 X<br />

ARTIST: CLAY ART CENTER, INC.<br />

CONTRACT #: A8592<br />

TITLE OF PROGRAM: CHRISTOPHER OSTROWSKI - CLAY CREATIONS<br />

TYPE OF PROGRAM: WORKSHOP<br />

DISTRICT/ SCHOOL: EASTCHESTER/WAVERLY EARLY CHILDHOOD CTR<br />

# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />

# OF STUDENTS: 11 GRADE(S) K<br />

DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 3/9-5/18/12<br />

NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />

STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 X STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />

1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />

1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />

1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />

2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />

3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />

4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />

5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />

6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />

7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />

CLAUDIA WORKS WELL WITH STUDENTS OF ALL AGES. HER<br />

PROGRAMS ARE CHALLENGING AND ENJOYABLE.<br />

8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />

NONE<br />

9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />

NONE<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

1.<br />

2.<br />

3.<br />

4.<br />

5.<br />

6.<br />

STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />

ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />

EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />

ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />

TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />

QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />

THE CHILDREN REALLY LOVED HAVING THEIR HANDS IN CLAY AND<br />

MAKING SOMETHING BEAUTIFUL.<br />

8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />

NONE<br />

9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />

NONE<br />

ARTIST: CLIFFORD WRIGHT-SUNFLOWER dba B CONTRACT #: A7593<br />

TITLE OF PROGRAM: DANCING WITH THE HONEY BEES<br />

TYPE OF PROGRAM: ASSEMBLY<br />

DISTRICT/ SCHOOL: EASTCHESTER/GREENVALE ELEM.<br />

# OF TEACHERS: 6<br />

# OF STUDENTS: 146 GRADE(S) 2<br />

DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 5/30/12<br />

NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />

STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />

ARTIST: CLIFFORD WRIGHT-SUNFLOWER dba B CONTRACT #: A8857<br />

TITLE OF PROGRAM: DANCING WITH THE HONEY BEES<br />

TYPE OF PROGRAM: ASSEMBLY<br />

DISTRICT/ SCHOOL: BREWSTER/GARDEN STREET ELEM.<br />

# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />

# OF STUDENTS: GRADE(S) K-3<br />

DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 5/18/12<br />

NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />

STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />

1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />

1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />

1.<br />

2.<br />

3.<br />

4.<br />

5.<br />

6.<br />

STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />

ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />

EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />

ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />

TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />

QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />

EXPLANATION OF PROCESS IS GREAT. THE STUDENTS LOVED HIM.<br />

8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />

NONE<br />

9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />

NONE<br />

1.<br />

2.<br />

3.<br />

4.<br />

5.<br />

6.<br />

STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />

ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />

EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />

ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />

TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />

QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

N/<br />

7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />

ALWAYS A PLEASURE TO HAVE AT OUR SCHOOL. THE STUDENTS<br />

AND TEACHERS LOVED HIM.<br />

8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />

NONE<br />

9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />

NONE<br />

Arts in Education Service - School Evaluations <strong>2011</strong>-<strong>2012</strong><br />

Page 63 of 332


ARTIST: CLIFTON CHADICK<br />

CONTRACT #: A8765<br />

TITLE OF PROGRAM: SET & PROP DESIGNER FOR THE SHOW - OUR TOWN<br />

TYPE OF PROGRAM: RESIDENCY<br />

DISTRICT/ SCHOOL: CHAPPAQUA/HORACE GREELEY HIGH SCHOOL<br />

# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />

# OF STUDENTS: 25 GRADE(S) 9-12<br />

DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 4/23-5/5/12<br />

NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />

STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 X STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />

ARTIST: CLIFTON CHADICK<br />

CONTRACT #: A8554<br />

TITLE OF PROGRAM: SET & PROP DESIGNER FOR THE SHOW - XANADU<br />

TYPE OF PROGRAM: RESIDENCY<br />

DISTRICT/ SCHOOL: CHAPPAQUA/HORACE GREELEY HIGH SCHOOL<br />

# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />

# OF STUDENTS: 200 GRADE(S) 12<br />

DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 3/9-4/21/12<br />

NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />

STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 X STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />

1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />

1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />

1.<br />

2.<br />

3.<br />

4.<br />

5.<br />

6.<br />

STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />

ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />

EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />

ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />

TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />

QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />

CLIFTON IS A FANTASTIC DESIGNER AND WORKS WELL WITH THE<br />

STUDENTS.<br />

8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />

NONE<br />

9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />

I HOPE TO WORK WITH CLIFTON AGAIN IN THE FUTURE.<br />

1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />

2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />

3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />

4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />

5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />

6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />

7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />

IMPORTANT FOR STUDENTS TO SEE AND LEARN HOW ALL THE<br />

ELEMENTS AND COMPONENTS OF A MUSICAL SHOW COME<br />

TOGETHER.<br />

8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />

NONE<br />

9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />

DAVID IS CREATIVE AND HARDWORKING. HE INSPIRED THE<br />

STUDENTS WITH HIS VISION.<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

ARTIST: CLIFTON CHADICK<br />

CONTRACT #: A8364<br />

TITLE OF PROGRAM: SET DESIGNER FOR THE SHOW - SIX DEGREES OF<br />

SEPARATION<br />

TYPE OF PROGRAM: RESIDENCY<br />

DISTRICT/ SCHOOL:<br />

CHAPPAQUA/HORACE GREELEY HIGH SCHOOL<br />

# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />

# OF STUDENTS: 38 GRADE(S) 9-12<br />

DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE<br />

2/1-3/12/12<br />

NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />

STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 X STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />

1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />

1.<br />

2.<br />

3.<br />

4.<br />

5.<br />

6.<br />

STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />

ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />

EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />

ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />

TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />

QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />

THE SET WAS BEAUTIFUL AND CLIFTON WORKED WELL WITH THE<br />

STUDENTS<br />

8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />

NONE<br />

9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />

I LOOK FORWARDED TO WORKING WITH HIM AGAIN.<br />

ARTIST: COMING TOGETHER FESTIVAL OF DAN CONTRACT #: A7786<br />

TITLE OF PROGRAM: LIVIA VANAVER - WORLD DANCE RESIDENCY<br />

TYPE OF PROGRAM: ASSEMBLY/RESIDENCY<br />

DISTRICT/ SCHOOL:<br />

KATONAH/LEWISBORO/KATONAH ELEM. SCHOOL<br />

# OF TEACHERS: 3<br />

# OF STUDENTS: 61 GRADE(S) 1<br />

DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE<br />

12/12-16/11<br />

NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />

STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 X STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4 X<br />

1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />

1.<br />

2.<br />

3.<br />

4.<br />

5.<br />

6.<br />

STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />

ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />

EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />

ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />

TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />

QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

N/<br />

7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />

WE ALWAYS ENJOY HAVING LIVIA VISIT US. SHE IS A FANTASTIC<br />

TEACHER.<br />

8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />

NONE<br />

9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />

WONDERFUL PROGRAM.<br />

Arts in Education Service - School Evaluations <strong>2011</strong>-<strong>2012</strong><br />

Page 64 of 332


ARTIST: COMMON SENSE COLONIAL<br />

CONTRACT #: A8659<br />

TITLE OF PROGRAM: AMY GARDINER - COLONIAL AMERICAN CULTURE &<br />

CRAFTS<br />

TYPE OF PROGRAM: WORKSHOP<br />

DISTRICT/ SCHOOL:<br />

# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />

YORKTOWN/CROMPOND ELEM.<br />

# OF STUDENTS: 275 GRADE(S) 4<br />

DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 3/30/12<br />

NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />

STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 X STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4 X<br />

ARTIST: COMMON SENSE COLONIAL<br />

CONTRACT #: A7938<br />

TITLE OF PROGRAM: AMY GARDINER - COLONIAL AMERICAN CULTURE &<br />

CRAFTS<br />

TYPE OF PROGRAM: WORKSHOP<br />

DISTRICT/ SCHOOL: NEW ROCHELLE/DAVIS ELEM. SCHOOL<br />

# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />

# OF STUDENTS: 100 GRADE(S) 2<br />

DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 11/16/11<br />

NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />

STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 X STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4 X<br />

1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />

1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />

1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />

2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />

3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />

4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />

5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />

6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />

7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />

HANDS-ON, LIVE EVENT AND EDUCATIONAL. FOLLOWS THE<br />

COMMON CORE STANDARDS.<br />

8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />

NONE<br />

9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />

WONDERFUL PRESENTORS, VERY INFORMATIVE AND INTERACTIVE.<br />

ARTIST: COMPUTER ADVENTURES, LLC CONTRACT #: A8289<br />

TITLE OF PROGRAM: ABIGAEL ESCOBAL - CREATING COMPUTER VIDEO<br />

GAMES<br />

TYPE OF PROGRAM: WORKSHOP<br />

DISTRICT/ SCHOOL:<br />

KATONAH/LEWISBORO/KATONAH ELEM. SCHOOL<br />

# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />

# OF STUDENTS: 12 GRADE(S) 4 & 5<br />

DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE<br />

1/20-3/16/12<br />

NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />

STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 X STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />

2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />

3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />

4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />

5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />

6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />

7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />

IT MAKES COLONIAL LIVING COME ALIVE.<br />

8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />

NONE<br />

9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />

ARTIST:<br />

THE ARTISTS ARE WARM, ENGAGING AND KNOW THEIR HISTORY.<br />

COMPUTER ADVENTURES, LLC<br />

CONTRACT #: A8059<br />

TITLE OF PROGRAM: HELENA FROYTON - STOP MOTION ANIMATED MOVIE<br />

MAKING<br />

TYPE OF PROGRAM: WORKSHOP<br />

DISTRICT/ SCHOOL:<br />

PELHAM/PROSPECT HILL ELEM.<br />

# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />

# OF STUDENTS: 12 GRADE(S) 3-5<br />

DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE<br />

1/12-3/8/12<br />

NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />

STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 X STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />

1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />

1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />

2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />

3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />

4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />

5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />

6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />

2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />

3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />

4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />

5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />

6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

N/<br />

7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />

OUR STUDENTS ALWAYS ENJOY THESE WELL RUN CLASSES.<br />

7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM?<br />

NONE<br />

Y<br />

WHY?<br />

8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />

NONE<br />

9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />

NONE<br />

8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />

NONE<br />

9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />

NONE<br />

Arts in Education Service - School Evaluations <strong>2011</strong>-<strong>2012</strong><br />

Page 65 of 332


ARTIST: COMPUTER ADVENTURES, LLC CONTRACT #: A7963A<br />

TITLE OF PROGRAM: HELENA FROYTON - STOP MOTION ANIMATED MOVIE<br />

MAKING<br />

TYPE OF PROGRAM: WORKSHOP<br />

DISTRICT/ SCHOOL:<br />

# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />

PELHAM/COLONIAL ELEM.<br />

# OF STUDENTS: 12 GRADE(S) 3-5<br />

DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 11/30/11-2/15/12<br />

NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />

STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 X STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />

1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />

ARTIST: COMPUTER ADVENTURES, LLC CONTRACT #: A8724<br />

TITLE OF PROGRAM: PETER GROBE - PHOTO COMIC BOOK CREATIONS<br />

TYPE OF PROGRAM: WORKSHOP<br />

DISTRICT/ SCHOOL: KATONAH/LEWISBORO/KATONAH ELEM. SCHOOL<br />

# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />

# OF STUDENTS: 8 GRADE(S) 3-5<br />

DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 4/9-6/4/12<br />

NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />

STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 X STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />

1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />

1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />

2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />

3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />

4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />

5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />

6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />

7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />

THE CHILDREN WERE VERY ENTHUSIASTIC AND FOCUSED ON<br />

LEARNING HOW TO USE DIGITAL CAMERIAS, HOW TO USE THE<br />

STOP MOTION MOVIE SOFTWARE AND VIDEO EDITING.<br />

8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />

NONE<br />

9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />

THE TEACHER WAS VERY NICE, PLEASANT AND HELPFUL.<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

N/<br />

N/<br />

1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />

2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />

3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />

4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />

5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />

6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />

7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />

NONE<br />

8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />

NONE<br />

9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />

NONE<br />

4<br />

4<br />

4<br />

4<br />

4<br />

4<br />

ARTIST: COMPUTER ADVENTURES, LLC CONTRACT #: A7963B<br />

TITLE OF PROGRAM: PETER GROBE - PHOTO COMIC BOOK CREATIONS<br />

TYPE OF PROGRAM: WORKSHOP<br />

DISTRICT/ SCHOOL:<br />

# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />

PELHAM/COLONIAL ELEM.<br />

# OF STUDENTS: 12 GRADE(S) 3-5<br />

DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 12/2/11-2/10/12<br />

NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />

STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 X STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />

ARTIST: COMPUTER ADVENTURES, LLC CONTRACT #: A8199B<br />

TITLE OF PROGRAM: PETER GROBE - PHOTO COMIC BOOK CREATIONS<br />

TYPE OF PROGRAM: WORKSHOP<br />

DISTRICT/ SCHOOL: CHAPPAQUA/ROARING BROOK ELEM.<br />

# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />

# OF STUDENTS: 9 GRADE(S) 3 & 4<br />

DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 1/11-2/29/12<br />

NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />

STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 X STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />

1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />

1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />

1.<br />

2.<br />

3.<br />

4.<br />

5.<br />

6.<br />

STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />

ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />

EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />

ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />

TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />

QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

N/<br />

N/<br />

7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />

THE CHILDREN ENJOYED THIS CLASS WHILE LEARNING HOW TO<br />

USE THE CAMERA, PHOTO EDITING SOFTWARE AND COMIC<br />

TEMPLATES. THE CHILDREN WERE VERY ANIMATED IN CREATING<br />

AND SHARING THEIR WORK.<br />

8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />

NONE<br />

9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />

THE TEACHER WAS HELPFUL AND PLEASANT.<br />

1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />

2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />

3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />

4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />

5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />

6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />

7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />

GREAT NEW PROGRAM.<br />

8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />

NONE<br />

9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />

NONE<br />

4<br />

4<br />

4<br />

4<br />

4<br />

5<br />

Arts in Education Service - School Evaluations <strong>2011</strong>-<strong>2012</strong><br />

Page 66 of 332


ARTIST: COMPUTER ADVENTURES, LLC CONTRACT #: A8157B<br />

TITLE OF PROGRAM: PETER GROBE - PHOTO COMIC BOOK CREATIONS<br />

TYPE OF PROGRAM: WORKSHOP<br />

DISTRICT/ SCHOOL: CHAPPAQUA/WESTORCHARD ELEM.<br />

# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />

# OF STUDENTS: 9 GRADE(S) 3 & 4<br />

DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 1/12-3/8/12<br />

NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />

STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 X STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />

1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />

ARTIST: COMPUTER ADVENTURES, LLC CONTRACT #: A8034B<br />

TITLE OF PROGRAM: RAYANON SMITH - DESIGNING ANIMATED VIDEO<br />

GAMES<br />

TYPE OF PROGRAM: WORKSHOP<br />

DISTRICT/ SCHOOL:<br />

# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />

CHAPPAQUA/GRAFFLIN ELEM.<br />

# OF STUDENTS: 10 GRADE(S) 4<br />

DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 1/11-3/21/12<br />

NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />

STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 X STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />

1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />

1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />

2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />

3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />

4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />

5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />

6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />

7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />

GREAT CLASS, GREAT ORGANIZATION.<br />

8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />

NONE<br />

9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />

NONE<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

N/<br />

1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />

2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />

3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />

4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />

5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />

6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />

7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />

NONE<br />

8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />

NONE<br />

9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />

NONE<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

4<br />

5<br />

5<br />

ARTIST: COMPUTER ADVENTURES, LLC CONTRACT #: A8157A<br />

TITLE OF PROGRAM: RAYANON SMITH - STOP MOTION ANIMATED MOVIE<br />

MAKING<br />

TYPE OF PROGRAM: WORKSHOP<br />

DISTRICT/ SCHOOL: CHAPPAQUA/WESTORCHARD ELEM.<br />

# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />

# OF STUDENTS: 11 GRADE(S) 3 & 4<br />

DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 1/10-3/6/12<br />

NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />

STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 X STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />

ARTIST: COMPUTER ADVENTURES, LLC CONTRACT #: A8034A<br />

TITLE OF PROGRAM: RAYANON SMITH - STOP MOTION ANIMATED MOVIE<br />

MAKING<br />

TYPE OF PROGRAM: WORKSHOP<br />

DISTRICT/ SCHOOL:<br />

# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />

CHAPPAQUA/GRAFFLIN ELEM.<br />

# OF STUDENTS: 10 GRADE(S) 3 & 4<br />

DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 1/9-3/12/12<br />

NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />

STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 X STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />

1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />

1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />

1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />

2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />

3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />

4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />

5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />

6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

N/<br />

1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />

2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />

3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />

4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />

5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />

6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

4<br />

5<br />

5<br />

7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM?<br />

GREAT CLASS, GREAT ORGANIZATION.<br />

Y<br />

WHY?<br />

7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM?<br />

NONE<br />

Y<br />

WHY?<br />

8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />

NONE<br />

9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />

NONE<br />

8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />

NONE<br />

9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />

NONE<br />

Arts in Education Service - School Evaluations <strong>2011</strong>-<strong>2012</strong><br />

Page 67 of 332


ARTIST: COMPUTER ADVENTURES, LLC CONTRACT #: A8199A<br />

TITLE OF PROGRAM: RAYANON SMITH - STOP MOTION ANIMATED MOVIE<br />

MAKING<br />

TYPE OF PROGRAM: WORKSHOP<br />

DISTRICT/ SCHOOL: CHAPPAQUA/ROARING BROOK ELEM.<br />

# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />

# OF STUDENTS: 12 GRADE(S) 3 & 4<br />

DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 1/9-3/5/12<br />

NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />

STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 X STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />

1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />

ARTIST: COMPUTER ADVENTURES, LLC CONTRACT #: A7552<br />

TITLE OF PROGRAM: VIVIAN TAI - STOP MOTION ANIMATED MOVIE MAKING<br />

TYPE OF PROGRAM: WORKSHOP<br />

DISTRICT/ SCHOOL: KATONAH/LEWISBORO/KATONAH ELEM. SCHOOL<br />

# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />

# OF STUDENTS: GRADE(S) 3-5<br />

DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 9/27-11/15/11<br />

NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />

STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 X STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />

1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />

1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />

2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />

3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />

4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />

5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />

6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />

7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />

PARENTS LOVED THE FINAL PRODUCT.<br />

8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />

NONE<br />

9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />

NONE<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

4<br />

5<br />

1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />

2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />

3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />

4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />

5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />

6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />

7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />

GREAT CLASSES. VERY WELL RECEIVED.<br />

8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />

NONE<br />

9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />

NONE<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

ARTIST: COMPUTER ADVENTURES, LLC CONTRACT #: A7503<br />

TITLE OF PROGRAM: VIVIAN TAI - STOP MOTION ANIMATED MOVIE MAKING<br />

TYPE OF PROGRAM: WORKSHOP<br />

DISTRICT/ SCHOOL: KATONAH/LEWISBORO/INCREASE MILLER ELEM.<br />

# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />

# OF STUDENTS: 7 GRADE(S) 3-5<br />

DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 10/3-11/28/11<br />

NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />

STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 X STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />

ARTIST: CONRAD R. WOYCE - BOB CONRAD PR CONTRACT #: A7970<br />

TITLE OF PROGRAM: MAGIC OF HEALTH & FITNESS SHOW<br />

TYPE OF PROGRAM: ASSEMBLY<br />

DISTRICT/ SCHOOL:<br />

# OF TEACHERS: 7<br />

CARMEL/PATERSON ELEM.<br />

# OF STUDENTS: 625 GRADE(S) K-4<br />

DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 6/15/12<br />

NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />

STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />

1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />

1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />

1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />

2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />

3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />

4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />

5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />

6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />

2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />

3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />

4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />

5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />

6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />

3<br />

3<br />

3<br />

3<br />

3<br />

3<br />

7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM?<br />

WE ENJOY ALL THE CLASSES.<br />

Y<br />

WHY?<br />

7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM?<br />

NONE<br />

Y<br />

WHY?<br />

8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />

NONE<br />

9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />

NONE<br />

8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />

SHOULD BE UPDATED. MORE INTERACTION, MAGIC AND MUSIC.<br />

9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />

NONE<br />

Arts in Education Service - School Evaluations <strong>2011</strong>-<strong>2012</strong><br />

Page 68 of 332


ARTIST: CONSTANCE S. PRENER<br />

CONTRACT #: A8423<br />

TITLE OF PROGRAM: ACCOMPANIST FOR THE SHOW - BEAUTY AND THE<br />

BEAST<br />

TYPE OF PROGRAM: ASSEMBLY<br />

DISTRICT/ SCHOOL: PLEASANTVILLE/PLEASANTVILLE MS & HS<br />

# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />

# OF STUDENTS: 100 GRADE(S) 6-12<br />

DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 2/3-3/8/12<br />

NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />

STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />

1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />

1.<br />

2.<br />

3.<br />

4.<br />

5.<br />

6.<br />

STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />

ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />

EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />

ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />

TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />

QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

N/<br />

7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />

WORKING WITH A REHEARSAL ACCOMPANIST MADE THE MUSICAL<br />

QUALITY IMPROVE AS WELL AS THE EFFICIENCY OF RUNNING<br />

CHOREOGRAPHY REHEARSALS.<br />

8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />

NONE<br />

9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />

CONNIE WORKS WONDERFULLY WITH THE STUDENTS,<br />

ENCOURAGING THEM TO HAVE MORE CONFIDENCE, AS WELL AS<br />

TEACHING MUSICIANSHIP SKILLS.<br />

ARTIST: CREATIVE CURIOSITY, INC.<br />

CONTRACT #: A8673<br />

TITLE OF PROGRAM: KIM McCORMACK - BUILDING A COMMUNITY MURAL<br />

TYPE OF PROGRAM: RESIDENCY<br />

DISTRICT/ SCHOOL:<br />

# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />

WHITE PLAINS/RIDGEWAY ELEM.<br />

# OF STUDENTS: 700 GRADE(S) K-5<br />

DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 3/27-6/13/12<br />

NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />

STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 X STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />

ARTIST: COPLAND HOUSE<br />

CONTRACT #: A7775<br />

TITLE OF PROGRAM: MUSIC WORKSHOPS<br />

TYPE OF PROGRAM: RESIDENCY<br />

DISTRICT/ SCHOOL: LAKELAND/LAKELAND HIGH SCHOOL<br />

# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />

# OF STUDENTS: 65 GRADE(S) 10-12<br />

DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 10/19, 27 & 11/11/11<br />

NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />

STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 X STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />

1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />

1.<br />

2.<br />

3.<br />

4.<br />

5.<br />

6.<br />

STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />

ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />

EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />

ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />

TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />

QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />

THIS PROGRAM BRINGS IN PROFESSIONAL MUSICIANS OF THE<br />

HIGHEST CALIBER WHO CAN FOCUS ON THE BEST APPROACHES<br />

TO THE MUSIC. THIS ONE-ON-ONE SPECIFICITY HELPS THE<br />

STUDENTS REALIZE HOW BETTER TO UNDERSTAND, PERFORM AND<br />

EXECUTE MUSIC.<br />

8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />

NONE<br />

9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />

TO HAVE THESE GREAT ARTISTS COME MORE FREQUENTLY TO<br />

SCHOOLS CREATES ONE OF THE RICHEST ENVIRONMENTS<br />

STUDENTS WILL EVER EXPERIENCE.<br />

ARTIST: CREATIVE CURIOSITY, INC.<br />

CONTRACT #: A8241<br />

TITLE OF PROGRAM: KIM McCORMACK - BUILDING A COMMUNITY MURAL<br />

TYPE OF PROGRAM: RESIDENCY<br />

DISTRICT/ SCHOOL:<br />

PELHAM/SIWANOY ELEM.<br />

# OF TEACHERS: 2<br />

# OF STUDENTS: 48 GRADE(S) 2<br />

DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE<br />

12/15-22/11<br />

NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />

STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 X STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />

1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />

1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />

1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />

2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />

3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />

4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />

5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />

6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />

7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />

KIM'S TECHNIQUES WERE FANTASTIC AND SHE IS EXTREMELY<br />

CREATIVE AND A GREAT PROBLEM SOLVER.<br />

8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />

NONE<br />

9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />

SHE PUT TOGETHER A MURAL THAT WE WILL ENJOY FOR MANY<br />

YEARS.<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />

2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />

3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />

4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />

5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />

6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />

7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />

CHILDREN WERE ENCOURAGED TO BE CREATIVE AND<br />

COOPERATIVE WITH EACH OTHER. STUDENTS WERE EXTREMELY<br />

ENGAGED DURING WORK PERIOD.<br />

8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />

HAVE AN ACTIVITY PLANNED FOR THE FINAL DAY WHEN YOU WERE<br />

ASSEMBLING THE PROJECTS AND SPRUCE UP DAY 1 A BIT.<br />

9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />

WONDERFUL ACTIVITY.<br />

4<br />

5<br />

5<br />

4<br />

4<br />

4<br />

Arts in Education Service - School Evaluations <strong>2011</strong>-<strong>2012</strong><br />

Page 69 of 332


ARTIST: CREATIVE CURIOSITY, INC.<br />

CONTRACT #: A8386<br />

TITLE OF PROGRAM: KIM McCORMACK - BUILDING A COMMUNITY MURAL<br />

TYPE OF PROGRAM: RESIDENCY<br />

DISTRICT/ SCHOOL: KATONAH/LEWISBORO/MEADOWPOND ELEM.<br />

# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />

# OF STUDENTS: GRADE(S) 1<br />

DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 3/12-16/12<br />

NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />

STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 X STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />

ARTIST: CREATIVE CURIOSITY, INC.<br />

CONTRACT #: A8339<br />

TITLE OF PROGRAM: KIM McCORMACK - SHADOW PUPPETS<br />

TYPE OF PROGRAM: RESIDENCY<br />

DISTRICT/ SCHOOL:<br />

# OF TEACHERS: 5<br />

CHAPPAQUA/GRAFFLIN ELEM.<br />

# OF STUDENTS: 8 GRADE(S) 1<br />

DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 1/11-13/12<br />

NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />

STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 X STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4 X<br />

1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />

1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />

1.<br />

2.<br />

3.<br />

4.<br />

5.<br />

6.<br />

STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />

ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />

EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />

ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />

TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />

QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />

KIM IS AMAZING AND SHOULD BE IN OR AT EVERY SCHOOL. THE<br />

ART AND CONNECTION TO THE CURRICULUM ENHANCES THE<br />

LEARNING OF EVERY STUDENT. THE HANDS ON LEARNING BRINGS<br />

OUT HIGH LEVEL THINKING SKILLS.<br />

8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />

NONE<br />

9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />

NONE<br />

1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />

2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />

3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />

4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />

5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />

6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />

7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />

THE STUDENTS LEARNED SO MUCH FROM KIM AND REALLY<br />

ENJOYED MAKING THE PUPPETS.<br />

8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />

NONE<br />

9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />

NONE<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

ARTIST: CYBER DISCOVERIS 2<br />

CONTRACT #: A7628<br />

TITLE OF PROGRAM: ERIC KANTOR - CREATING A TECHNO MOVIE<br />

TYPE OF PROGRAM: WORKSHOP<br />

DISTRICT/ SCHOOL:<br />

# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />

NORTH SALEM/PQ ELEM.<br />

# OF STUDENTS: 9 GRADE(S) 2-5<br />

DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 10/6-12/15/11<br />

NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />

STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 X STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />

ARTIST: CYNTHIA EXTANCE<br />

CONTRACT #: A7624B<br />

TITLE OF PROGRAM: BEADING BONANZA<br />

TYPE OF PROGRAM: WORKSHOP<br />

DISTRICT/ SCHOOL:<br />

# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />

NORTH SALEM/PQ ELEM.<br />

# OF STUDENTS: GRADE(S) 3-5<br />

DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 10/5-11/30/11<br />

NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />

STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 X STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />

1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />

1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />

1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />

2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />

3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />

4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />

5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />

6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />

2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />

3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />

4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />

5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />

6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM?<br />

NONE<br />

Y<br />

WHY?<br />

7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM?<br />

NONE<br />

Y<br />

WHY?<br />

8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />

NONE<br />

9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />

NONE<br />

8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />

NONE<br />

9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />

NONE<br />

Arts in Education Service - School Evaluations <strong>2011</strong>-<strong>2012</strong><br />

Page 70 of 332


ARTIST: CYNTHIA EXTANCE<br />

CONTRACT #: A8265B<br />

TITLE OF PROGRAM: BEADING BONANZA<br />

TYPE OF PROGRAM: WORKSHOP<br />

DISTRICT/ SCHOOL:<br />

# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />

NORTH SALEM/PQ ELEM.<br />

# OF STUDENTS: 17 GRADE(S) 3-5<br />

DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 1/25-3/21/12<br />

NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />

STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 X STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />

ARTIST: CYNTHIA EXTANCE<br />

CONTRACT #: A8742B<br />

TITLE OF PROGRAM: BEADING BONANZA<br />

TYPE OF PROGRAM: WORKSHOP<br />

DISTRICT/ SCHOOL:<br />

# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />

NORTH SALEM/PQ ELEM.<br />

# OF STUDENTS: 9 GRADE(S) 3-5<br />

DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 4/18-6/6/12<br />

NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />

STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 X STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />

1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />

1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />

1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />

2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />

3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />

4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />

5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />

6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />

2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />

3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />

4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />

5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />

6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM?<br />

NONE<br />

Y<br />

WHY?<br />

7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM?<br />

NONE<br />

Y<br />

WHY?<br />

8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />

NONE<br />

9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />

NONE<br />

8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />

NONE<br />

9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />

NONE<br />

ARTIST: CYNTHIA EXTANCE<br />

CONTRACT #: A7624A<br />

TITLE OF PROGRAM: BEYOND BEADING<br />

TYPE OF PROGRAM: WORKSHOP<br />

DISTRICT/ SCHOOL:<br />

# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />

NORTH SALEM/PQ ELEM.<br />

# OF STUDENTS: GRADE(S) 3-5<br />

DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 10/3-11/28/11<br />

NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />

STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 X STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />

ARTIST: CYNTHIA EXTANCE<br />

CONTRACT #: A8742A<br />

TITLE OF PROGRAM: BEYOND BEADING<br />

TYPE OF PROGRAM: WORKSHOP<br />

DISTRICT/ SCHOOL:<br />

# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />

NORTH SALEM/PQ ELEM.<br />

# OF STUDENTS: 9 GRADE(S) 3-5<br />

DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 4/16-6/11/12<br />

NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />

STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 X STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />

1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />

1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />

1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />

2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />

3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />

4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />

5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />

6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />

2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />

3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />

4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />

5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />

6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM?<br />

NONE<br />

Y<br />

WHY?<br />

7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM?<br />

NONE<br />

Y<br />

WHY?<br />

8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />

NONE<br />

9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />

NONE<br />

8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />

NONE<br />

9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />

NONE<br />

Arts in Education Service - School Evaluations <strong>2011</strong>-<strong>2012</strong><br />

Page 71 of 332


ARTIST: CYNTHIA EXTANCE<br />

CONTRACT #: A8265A<br />

TITLE OF PROGRAM: BEYOND BEADING<br />

TYPE OF PROGRAM: WORKSHOP<br />

DISTRICT/ SCHOOL:<br />

# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />

NORTH SALEM/PQ ELEM.<br />

# OF STUDENTS: 17 GRADE(S) 3-5<br />

DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 1/23-3/19/12<br />

NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />

STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 X STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />

ARTIST: CYNTHIA GREEN-BIRO<br />

CONTRACT #: A8692A<br />

TITLE OF PROGRAM: MUSICAL THEATER - A TASTE OF BROADWAY<br />

TYPE OF PROGRAM: WORKSHOP<br />

DISTRICT/ SCHOOL: KATONAH/LEWISBORO/KATONAH ELEM. SCHOOL<br />

# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />

# OF STUDENTS: 9 GRADE(S) K-2<br />

DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 4/9-6/4/12<br />

NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />

STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />

1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />

1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />

1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />

2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />

3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />

4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />

5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />

6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />

2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />

3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />

4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />

5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />

6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />

3<br />

3<br />

3<br />

3<br />

3<br />

3<br />

7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM?<br />

NONE<br />

8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />

NONE<br />

9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />

NONE<br />

Y<br />

WHY?<br />

7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />

VERY GOOD INSTRUCTOR AND THE STUDENTS ENJOYED THE<br />

CLASS.<br />

8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />

NONE<br />

9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />

NONE<br />

ARTIST: CYNTHIA GREEN-BIRO<br />

CONTRACT #: A8287<br />

TITLE OF PROGRAM: MUSICAL THEATER - A TASTE OF BROADWAY<br />

TYPE OF PROGRAM: WORKSHOP<br />

DISTRICT/ SCHOOL: KATONAH/LEWISBORO/KATONAH ELEM. SCHOOL<br />

# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />

# OF STUDENTS: 11 GRADE(S) K-2<br />

DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 1/19-3/15/12<br />

NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />

STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />

ARTIST: CYNTHIA GREEN-BIRO<br />

CONTRACT #: A7556<br />

TITLE OF PROGRAM: MUSICAL THEATRE - A TASTE OF BROADWAY<br />

TYPE OF PROGRAM: WORKSHOP<br />

DISTRICT/ SCHOOL: KATONAH/LEWISBORO/KATONAH ELEM. SCHOOL<br />

# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />

# OF STUDENTS: 8 GRADE(S) K-2<br />

DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 9/23-12/16/11<br />

NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />

STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />

1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />

1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />

1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />

2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />

3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />

4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />

5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />

6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />

7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />

NONE<br />

8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />

NONE<br />

9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />

NONE<br />

3<br />

3<br />

3<br />

3<br />

3<br />

3<br />

1.<br />

2.<br />

3.<br />

4.<br />

5.<br />

6.<br />

STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />

ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />

EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />

ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />

TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />

QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />

4<br />

4<br />

4<br />

4<br />

4<br />

4<br />

7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />

CYNTHIA IS A PROFESSIONAL AND WELL ORGANIZED<br />

INSTRUCTOR. SHE IS WELL LIKED BY THE STUDENTS AND GIVES<br />

VERY GOOD CLASSES.<br />

8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />

NONE<br />

9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />

NONE<br />

Arts in Education Service - School Evaluations <strong>2011</strong>-<strong>2012</strong><br />

Page 72 of 332


ARTIST: CYNTHIA GREEN-BIRO<br />

CONTRACT #: A7556B<br />

TITLE OF PROGRAM: MUSICAL THEATRE - HIP HOP MUSIC & DANCING<br />

TYPE OF PROGRAM: WORKSHOP<br />

DISTRICT/ SCHOOL: KATONAH/LEWISBORO/KATONAH ELEM. SCHOOL<br />

# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />

# OF STUDENTS: 9 GRADE(S) K-2<br />

DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 9/28-11/16/11<br />

NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />

STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />

ARTIST: D. J. GREENBURG, FLP (DAN GREENBU CONTRACT #: A8632<br />

TITLE OF PROGRAM: AUTHOR VISIT<br />

TYPE OF PROGRAM: ASSEMBLY<br />

DISTRICT/ SCHOOL: BREWSTER/GARDEN STREET ELEM.<br />

# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />

# OF STUDENTS: GRADE(S) 3<br />

DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 3/16/12<br />

NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />

STANDARD 1 STANDARD 2 STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />

1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />

1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />

1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />

2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />

3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />

4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />

5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />

6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />

7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />

SHE IS A VERY GOOD ARTIST/INSTRUCTOR. WELL LIKED AND A<br />

GOOD CLASS.<br />

8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />

NONE<br />

9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />

NONE<br />

4<br />

4<br />

4<br />

4<br />

4<br />

4<br />

1.<br />

2.<br />

3.<br />

4.<br />

5.<br />

6.<br />

STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />

ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />

EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />

ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />

TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />

QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

4<br />

5<br />

7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />

DAN ENTERTAINED CHILDREN WITH WONDERFUL STORIES OF HIS<br />

TRAVELS.<br />

8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />

USE MORE TECHNOLOGY SUCH AS A POWERPOINT PRESENTATION.<br />

9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />

HAPPY TO HAVE DAN VISIT US.<br />

ARTIST: D. J. GREENBURG, FLP (DAN GREENBU CONTRACT #: A8209<br />

TITLE OF PROGRAM: AUTHOR VISIT<br />

TYPE OF PROGRAM: ASSEMBLY<br />

DISTRICT/ SCHOOL: CHAPPAQUA/ROARING BROOK ELEM.<br />

# OF TEACHERS: 4<br />

# OF STUDENTS: 300 GRADE(S) 2-4<br />

DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 3/19/12<br />

NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />

STANDARD 1 STANDARD 2 STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />

ARTIST: D. J. GREENBURG, FLP (DAN GREENBU CONTRACT #: A7785<br />

TITLE OF PROGRAM: AUTHOR VISIT<br />

TYPE OF PROGRAM: ASSEMBLY<br />

DISTRICT/ SCHOOL: HENDRICK HUDSON/FURNACE WOODS ELEM.<br />

# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />

# OF STUDENTS: 65 GRADE(S) 3<br />

DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 10/6/11<br />

NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />

STANDARD 1 STANDARD 2 STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />

1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />

1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />

1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />

2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />

3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />

4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />

5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />

6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />

4<br />

2<br />

2<br />

3<br />

2<br />

N/<br />

1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />

2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />

3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />

4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />

5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />

6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />

5<br />

5<br />

4<br />

4<br />

5<br />

N/<br />

7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? N WHY?<br />

DIDN'T DISCUSS THE WRITING PROCESS. SOME STORIES WERE<br />

INAPPROPRIATE FOR ELEMENTARY STUDENTS (BURNING<br />

BUILDINGS, HOMICIDE, OUT OF BODY EXPERIENCE).<br />

8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />

INCORPORATE LESSONS FOR YOUNG STUDENT WRITERS.<br />

VISUALSOF WRITING PROCESS AND YOUR WRITER LIFE.<br />

9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />

NONE<br />

7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />

THE TONE AND CONTENT OF SOME OF HIS BOOKS MIGHT BE<br />

BETTER FOR OLDER STUDENTS, BUT ZACK FILES ARE VERY<br />

APPROPRIATE FOR 3RD GRADE.<br />

8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />

NONE<br />

9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />

NONE<br />

Arts in Education Service - School Evaluations <strong>2011</strong>-<strong>2012</strong><br />

Page 73 of 332


ARTIST: D. J. GREENBURG, FLP (DAN GREENBU CONTRACT #: A8672<br />

TITLE OF PROGRAM: AUTHOR VISIT<br />

TYPE OF PROGRAM: ASSEMBLY<br />

DISTRICT/ SCHOOL: PUTNAM VALLEY/PUTNAM VALLEY ELEM.<br />

# OF TEACHERS: 7<br />

# OF STUDENTS: 200 GRADE(S) 3 & 4<br />

DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 3/26/12<br />

NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />

STANDARD 1 STANDARD 2 STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />

ARTIST: D. J. GREENBURG, FLP (DAN GREENBU CONTRACT #: A8632<br />

TITLE OF PROGRAM: AUTHOR VISIT<br />

TYPE OF PROGRAM: ASSEMBLY<br />

DISTRICT/ SCHOOL:<br />

# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />

BREWSTER/JFK ELEM.<br />

# OF STUDENTS: 125 GRADE(S) 3<br />

DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 3/12/12<br />

NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />

STANDARD 1 STANDARD 2 STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />

1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />

1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />

1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />

2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />

3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />

4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />

5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />

6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />

7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />

DAN'S EXPERIENCES WERE VERY INTERESTING AND THE<br />

STUDENTS ENJOYED HEARING ABOUT HIS ADVENTURES.<br />

8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />

MORE VISUALS AND MORE INTERACTION.<br />

9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />

NONE<br />

4<br />

4<br />

5<br />

4<br />

4<br />

N/<br />

1.<br />

2.<br />

3.<br />

4.<br />

5.<br />

6.<br />

STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />

ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />

EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />

ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />

TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />

QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />

THE CHILDREN WERE CAPTIVATED BY HIS STORYTELLING. HE<br />

SHARED INFORMATION ABOUT HIS INSPIRATION, TECHNIQUES, AND<br />

EXPERIENCE AS AN AUTHOR.<br />

8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />

NONE<br />

9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />

DAN'S PRESENTATION KEPT THE STUDENTS ATTENTION,<br />

ENCOURAGED THEM TO WRITE AND DISCUSS THE IMPORTANCE OF<br />

REVISION. HE WAS WONDERFUL.<br />

ARTIST: DANCE CAVISE, INC.<br />

CONTRACT #: A7891A<br />

TITLE OF PROGRAM: JOE CAVISE - BEYOND BALLROOM DANCING<br />

TYPE OF PROGRAM: ASSEMBLY/RESIDENCY<br />

DISTRICT/ SCHOOL: WHITE PLAINS/GEORGE WASHINGTON ELEM.<br />

# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />

# OF STUDENTS: 118 GRADE(S) 5<br />

DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 10/21-12/1/11<br />

NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />

STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 X STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4 X<br />

ARTIST: DANCE CAVISE, INC.<br />

CONTRACT #: A7891C<br />

TITLE OF PROGRAM: JOE CAVISE - BEYOND BALLROOM DANCING<br />

TYPE OF PROGRAM: ASSEMBLY/RESIDENCY<br />

DISTRICT/ SCHOOL:<br />

# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />

WHITE PLAINS/POST ROAD ELEM.<br />

# OF STUDENTS: 75 GRADE(S) 4<br />

DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 1/20-3/1/12<br />

NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />

STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 X STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4 X<br />

1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />

1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />

1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />

2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />

3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />

4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />

5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />

6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />

4<br />

4<br />

4<br />

4<br />

5<br />

N/<br />

1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />

2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />

3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />

4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />

5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />

6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />

THE STUDENTS WER HIGHY ENGAGED AND THE PARENTS<br />

ENJOYED IT.<br />

8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />

NONE<br />

9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />

NONE<br />

7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />

THIS PROGRAM BUILDS COMMUNITY, MUTUAL RESPECT,<br />

CULTURAL APPRECIATION AND MUSICAL SKILLS.<br />

8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />

NONE<br />

9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />

GREAT WORK WITH OUR STUDENTS.<br />

Arts in Education Service - School Evaluations <strong>2011</strong>-<strong>2012</strong><br />

Page 74 of 332


ARTIST: DANCE CAVISE, INC.<br />

CONTRACT #: A7891E<br />

TITLE OF PROGRAM: JOE CAVISE - BEYOND BALLROOM DANCING<br />

TYPE OF PROGRAM: ASSEMBLY/RESIDENCY<br />

DISTRICT/ SCHOOL:<br />

# OF TEACHERS: 5<br />

WHITE PLAINS/RIDGEWAY ELEM.<br />

# OF STUDENTS: 105 GRADE(S) 4<br />

DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 4/6-6/8/12<br />

NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />

STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 X STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4 X<br />

ARTIST: DANCE CAVISE, INC.<br />

CONTRACT #: A8803<br />

TITLE OF PROGRAM: JOE CAVISE - BEYOND BALLROOM DANCING<br />

TYPE OF PROGRAM: ASSEMBLY/RESIDENCY<br />

DISTRICT/ SCHOOL:<br />

# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />

WHITE PLAINS/ALL ELEM.<br />

# OF STUDENTS: 550 GRADE(S) 4 & 5<br />

DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 4/26-5/18/12<br />

NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />

STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 X STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4 X<br />

1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />

1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />

1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />

2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />

3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />

4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />

5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />

6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />

7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />

IT WAS A WONDERFUL LEARNING EXPERIENCE.<br />

8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />

THE STUDENTS WERE DISAPPOINTED THAT MR. CAVISE WAS NOT<br />

AROUND FOR THE PRACTICES. MS. DIAMOND IS WONDERFUL AND<br />

RAN THE WHOLE SHOW.<br />

9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />

THE COSTUMES ARE BECOMING WORN AND OLD, SOME HAVING<br />

TEARS AND RIPS.<br />

ARTIST: DANCE CAVISE, INC.<br />

CONTRACT #: A7891D<br />

TITLE OF PROGRAM: JOE CAVISE - BEYOND BALLROOM DANCING<br />

TYPE OF PROGRAM: ASSEMBLY/RESIDENCY<br />

DISTRICT/ SCHOOL:<br />

WHITE PLAINS/MAMARONECK AVENUE ELEM. ELEM.<br />

# OF TEACHERS: 4<br />

# OF STUDENTS: 115 GRADE(S) 4<br />

DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE<br />

3/39-5/10/12<br />

NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />

STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 X STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4 X<br />

4<br />

5<br />

4<br />

5<br />

5<br />

4<br />

1.<br />

2.<br />

3.<br />

4.<br />

5.<br />

6.<br />

STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />

ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />

EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />

ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />

TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />

QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />

THE BENEFITS FOR STUDENTS, TEACHERS AND THE SCHOOL<br />

COMMUNITY ARE LIMITLESS. IT IS SO POPULAR AMOUNGST EVERY<br />

CONTINGENCY IN THE DISTRICT.<br />

8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />

NONE<br />

9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />

ARTIST:<br />

NONE<br />

DANCE CAVISE, INC.<br />

CONTRACT #: A7891B<br />

TITLE OF PROGRAM: JOE CAVISE - BEYOND BALLROOM DANCING<br />

TYPE OF PROGRAM: ASSEMBLY/RESIDENCY<br />

DISTRICT/ SCHOOL:<br />

WHITE PLAINS/CHURCH STREET ELEM.<br />

# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />

# OF STUDENTS: 100 GRADE(S) 5<br />

DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE<br />

10/21-12/1/11<br />

NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />

STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 X STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4 X<br />

1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />

1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />

1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />

2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />

3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />

4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />

5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />

6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />

2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />

3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />

4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />

5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />

6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />

4<br />

4<br />

4<br />

4<br />

4<br />

N/<br />

7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM?<br />

NONE<br />

8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />

NONE<br />

9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />

NONE<br />

Y<br />

WHY?<br />

7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />

THE PROGRAM INVOLVES AND ENGAGES ALL STUDENTS IN<br />

CULTURAL DANCE AND TEACHES ABOUT DANCE ETIQUETTE.<br />

8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />

THE ARTIST CAN INVEST IN NEW COSTUMES AND ACCESSORIES<br />

AND EVEN MUSIC.<br />

9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />

WE LOOK FORWARD TO HAVING THE PROGRAM AGAIN.<br />

Arts in Education Service - School Evaluations <strong>2011</strong>-<strong>2012</strong><br />

Page 75 of 332


ARTIST: DANCE IN EDUCATION & THE RELATED CONTRACT #: A7814<br />

TITLE OF PROGRAM: CHRISTIAN CLAESSENS - LIFE SKILLS DANCE<br />

PROGRAM<br />

TYPE OF PROGRAM: RESIDENCY<br />

DISTRICT/ SCHOOL: NEW ROCHELLE/NEW ROCHELLE HS<br />

# OF TEACHERS: 2<br />

# OF STUDENTS: 25 GRADE(S) 9-12<br />

DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 10/17-12/6/11<br />

NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />

STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 X STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />

1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />

1.<br />

2.<br />

3.<br />

4.<br />

5.<br />

6.<br />

STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />

ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />

EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />

ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />

TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />

QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />

5<br />

5<br />

4<br />

5<br />

5<br />

N/<br />

7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />

THE STUDENTS HAVE GROWN IN SELF-ESTEEM AND CONFIDENCE<br />

WHEN PERFORMING ON STAGE. THE PROGRAM ALLOWS THE<br />

STUDENTS TO INTERACT MORE READILY WITH ONE ANOTHER.<br />

8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />

NONE<br />

9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />

HE IS VERY PROFESSIONAL WHEN DEALING WITH THE STUDENTS.<br />

HE IS VERY RESPECTFUL AND IN TURN THE STUDENTS PAY<br />

ATTENTION AND ARE EAGER TO LEARN NEW DANCE STEPS.<br />

ARTIST: DANCE THEATRE OF HARLEM<br />

CONTRACT #: A8008A<br />

TITLE OF PROGRAM: DANCE TECHNIQUES FOR MIDDLE SCHOOL<br />

TYPE OF PROGRAM: RESIDENCY<br />

DISTRICT/ SCHOOL: NEW ROCHELLE/ISAAC YOUNG MIDDLE SCHOOL<br />

# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />

# OF STUDENTS: 102 GRADE(S) 6-8<br />

DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 12/12-16/11<br />

NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />

STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 X STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4 X<br />

ARTIST: DANCE THEATRE OF HARLEM<br />

CONTRACT #: A8472B<br />

TITLE OF PROGRAM: ASTON McCULLOUGH MOVEMENT WORKSHOPS<br />

TYPE OF PROGRAM: RESIDENCY<br />

DISTRICT/ SCHOOL: NEW ROCHELLE/ISAAC YOUNG MIDDLE SCHOOL<br />

# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />

# OF STUDENTS: 82 GRADE(S) 6-8<br />

DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 5/2-16/12<br />

NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />

STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 X STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4 X<br />

1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />

1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />

2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />

3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />

4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />

5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />

6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />

7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />

THE ARTIST WAS ABLE TO GIVE THE STUDENTS A WORKING<br />

VOCABULARY FROM WHICH TO CREATE WITH EASE.<br />

8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />

MODIFICATION OF PROGRAM MAYBE NECESSARY WITH EACH<br />

CLASS SO DON'T HESITATE TO DO SO.<br />

9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />

ARTIST WAS WELL PREPARED, PRESENTED HIS LESSON WITH A<br />

CLEAR FOCUS AND CONTINUED TO BUILD ON HIS CONCEPT FOR<br />

THE 5 DAYS.<br />

ARTIST: DANCE THEATRE OF HARLEM<br />

CONTRACT #: A8008B<br />

TITLE OF PROGRAM: DANCE TECHNIQUES FOR MIDDLE SCHOOL<br />

TYPE OF PROGRAM: RESIDENCY<br />

DISTRICT/ SCHOOL:<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

N/<br />

N/<br />

NEW ROCHELLE/ALBERT LEONARD MIDDLE SCHOOL<br />

# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />

# OF STUDENTS: 376 GRADE(S) 6-8<br />

DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE<br />

12/12-16/11<br />

NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />

STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 X STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4 X<br />

1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />

1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />

1.<br />

2.<br />

3.<br />

4.<br />

5.<br />

6.<br />

STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />

ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />

EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />

ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />

TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />

QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

4<br />

7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />

SCHOOLS CAN GAIN THE EXPERIENCE AND THE VALUE OF DANCE.<br />

STUDENTS WERE FULLY ENGAGED IN THE DANCE CONCEPTS,<br />

ACTIVITIES AND SKILLS.<br />

8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />

NONE<br />

9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />

ASTON WAS AN EXCELLENT DANCE TEACHER WITH EFFECTIVE<br />

CLASSROOM MANAGEMENT SKILLS, ENERGY AND TEACHING<br />

DANCE TECHNIQUES.<br />

1.<br />

2.<br />

3.<br />

4.<br />

5.<br />

6.<br />

STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />

ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />

EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />

ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />

TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />

QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />

THIS PROGRAM WAS SPECIFICALLY DESIGNED FOR OUR SCHOOL<br />

AND EACH GRADE HAS A SPECIFIC LESSON PLAN WITH GOALS<br />

THAT WERE CLEARLY TARGETED AND ACHIEVED.<br />

8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />

NONE<br />

9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />

WE HAD A POSITIVE EXPERIENCE TO BUILD ON.<br />

Arts in Education Service - School Evaluations <strong>2011</strong>-<strong>2012</strong><br />

Page 76 of 332


ARTIST: DANCE THEATRE OF HARLEM<br />

CONTRACT #: A8472A<br />

TITLE OF PROGRAM: DIASPORA PROJECT SHOWS<br />

TYPE OF PROGRAM: ASSEMBLY<br />

DISTRICT/ SCHOOL: NEW ROCHELLE/ISAAC YOUNG MIDDLE SCHOOL<br />

# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />

# OF STUDENTS: 1149 GRADE(S) 6-8<br />

DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 2/9/12<br />

NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />

STANDARD 1 STANDARD 2 STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4 X<br />

1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />

ARTIST: DANCE THEATRE OF HARLEM<br />

CONTRACT #: A8008C<br />

TITLE OF PROGRAM: MEGAN MINTURN, ASTON McCULLOUGH, ADELHEID<br />

STRELICK - DANCE TECHNIQUES & ARTISTRY<br />

TYPE OF PROGRAM: RESIDENCY<br />

DISTRICT/ SCHOOL: NEW ROCHELLE/NEW ROCHELLE HS<br />

# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />

# OF STUDENTS: 32 GRADE(S) 9 & 10<br />

DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 1/27-3/20/12<br />

NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />

STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 X STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4 X<br />

1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />

1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />

2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />

3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />

4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />

5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />

6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />

7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />

THE PROGRAM WAS WELL ORGANIZED, AESTHETICALLY<br />

ENJOYABLE AND EXTREMELY INFORMATIVE.<br />

8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />

NONE<br />

9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />

BECAUSE THE PROGRAM RELATED PERSONAL EXPERIENCES OF<br />

THE PERFORMERS AND THE ARTISTS PROTRAYED STUDENTS<br />

WERE ABLE TO INTERNALIZE THEIR EXPERIENCE, HERITAGE AND<br />

SEE THE POSSIBILITIES.<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />

2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />

3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />

4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />

5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />

6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />

7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />

THEY HAD A CONTENT FILLED PROGRAM.<br />

8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />

NONE<br />

9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />

NONE<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

ARTIST: DANCE VECTORS, INC. dba PHYLLIS RO<br />

CONTRACT #: A8192<br />

TITLE OF PROGRAM: STEP LIVELY PLEASE - AFRICAN AMERICAN<br />

CELEBRATION<br />

TYPE OF PROGRAM: ASSEMBLY<br />

DISTRICT/ SCHOOL: LAKELAND/GEORGE WASHINGTON ELEM.<br />

# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />

# OF STUDENTS: 499 GRADE(S) K-5<br />

DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 3/9/12<br />

NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />

STANDARD 1 STANDARD 2 STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4 X<br />

ARTIST: DANCE VECTORS, INC. dba PHYLLIS RO<br />

CONTRACT #: A8426<br />

TITLE OF PROGRAM: STEP LIVELY PLEASE - AFRICAN AMERICAN<br />

CELEBRATION<br />

TYPE OF PROGRAM: ASSEMBLY<br />

DISTRICT/ SCHOOL:<br />

# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />

YORKTOWN/CROMPOND ELEM.<br />

# OF STUDENTS: 400 GRADE(S) 4 & 5<br />

DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 2/17/12<br />

NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />

STANDARD 1 STANDARD 2 STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4 X<br />

1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />

1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />

1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />

2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />

3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />

4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />

5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />

6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />

7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />

THE STUDENTS GOT A GOOD UNDERSTANDING OF THE AFRICAN<br />

AMERICAN CULTURE THROUGH THE ARTS.<br />

8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />

NONE<br />

9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />

NONE<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

N/<br />

1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />

2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />

3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />

4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />

5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />

6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />

7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />

THE PERFORMERS WERE GREAT AND THE STUDENTS HAD A<br />

WONDERFUL TIME INTERACTING WITH THEM.<br />

8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />

NONE<br />

9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />

NONE<br />

5<br />

4<br />

4<br />

5<br />

5<br />

4<br />

Arts in Education Service - School Evaluations <strong>2011</strong>-<strong>2012</strong><br />

Page 77 of 332


ARTIST: DANIEL FORMAN<br />

CONTRACT #: A7890C<br />

TITLE OF PROGRAM: ACCOMPANIST FOR THE CHOIR PERFORMANCE<br />

TYPE OF PROGRAM: ASSEMBLY<br />

DISTRICT/ SCHOOL: WHITE PLAINS/WHITE PLAINS HIGH SCHOOL<br />

# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />

# OF STUDENTS: GRADE(S) 9-12<br />

DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 5/31/12<br />

NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />

STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />

ARTIST: DANIEL FORMAN<br />

CONTRACT #: A7890A<br />

TITLE OF PROGRAM: ACCOMPANIST FOR THE CHOIR PERFORMANCE<br />

TYPE OF PROGRAM: ASSEMBLY<br />

DISTRICT/ SCHOOL: WHITE PLAINS/WHITE PLAINS HIGH SCHOOL<br />

# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />

# OF STUDENTS: GRADE(S) 9-12<br />

DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 12/13-15/11<br />

NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />

STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />

1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />

1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />

1.<br />

2.<br />

3.<br />

4.<br />

5.<br />

6.<br />

STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />

ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />

EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />

ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />

TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />

QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />

DAN IS EASY TO WORK WITH AND THE STUDENTS REALLY<br />

RESPOND WELL TO HIM AND APPRECIATE HIS CONTRIBUTION TO<br />

OUR CNCERT.<br />

8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />

NONE<br />

9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />

NONE<br />

1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />

2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />

3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />

4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />

5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />

6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />

7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />

DAN IS ALWAYS WELL PREPARED AND PROFESSIONAL.<br />

8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />

NONE<br />

9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />

NONE<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

N/<br />

ARTIST: DANIEL FORMAN<br />

CONTRACT #: A7890B<br />

TITLE OF PROGRAM: ACCOMPANIST FOR THE CHOIR PERFORMANCE<br />

TYPE OF PROGRAM: ASSEMBLY<br />

DISTRICT/ SCHOOL: WHITE PLAINS/WHITE PLAINS HIGH SCHOOL<br />

# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />

# OF STUDENTS: GRADE(S) 9-12<br />

DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 3/15/12<br />

NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />

STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />

ARTIST: DANIEL GUTMAN<br />

CONTRACT #: A8770<br />

TITLE OF PROGRAM: AUTHOR VISIT<br />

TYPE OF PROGRAM: ASSEMBLY<br />

DISTRICT/ SCHOOL:<br />

# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />

BRIARCLIFF/TODD ELEM.<br />

# OF STUDENTS: 350 GRADE(S) 3-5<br />

DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 5/11/12<br />

NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />

STANDARD 1 STANDARD 2 STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />

1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />

1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />

1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />

2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />

3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />

4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />

5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />

6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />

7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />

NONE<br />

8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />

NONE<br />

9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />

NONE<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

1.<br />

2.<br />

3.<br />

4.<br />

5.<br />

6.<br />

STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />

ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />

EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />

ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />

TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />

QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />

DAN IS INFORMATIVE AND ENGAGING. HE WAS A PHENOMENAL<br />

SUCCESS AND AS SEVERAL STUDENTS SAID "THE BEST AUTHOR<br />

VISIT EVER".<br />

8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />

NONE<br />

9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />

NONE<br />

Arts in Education Service - School Evaluations <strong>2011</strong>-<strong>2012</strong><br />

Page 78 of 332


ARTIST:<br />

DANIEL GUTMAN<br />

TITLE OF PROGRAM: AUTHOR VISIT<br />

TYPE OF PROGRAM: ASSEMBLY<br />

DISTRICT/ SCHOOL:<br />

EASTCHESTER/GREENVALE ELEM.<br />

CONTRACT #: A7566<br />

# OF TEACHERS: 6<br />

# OF STUDENTS: 525 GRADE(S) 2-5<br />

DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE<br />

1/13/12<br />

NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />

STANDARD 1 STANDARD 2 STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />

1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />

1.<br />

2.<br />

3.<br />

4.<br />

5.<br />

6.<br />

STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />

ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />

EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />

ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />

TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />

QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />

VERY GOOD WITH CHILDREN. ANSWERED ALL QUESTIONS AND<br />

WAS HELPFUL IN MAKING STUDENTS UNDERSTAND THE LIFE OF AN<br />

ARTIST.<br />

8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />

NONE<br />

9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />

NONE<br />

ARTIST: DARIUS KAUFMANN<br />

CONTRACT #: A8422<br />

TITLE OF PROGRAM: JOURNEYS WITH SOUND - MUSIC OF THE EARTH<br />

TYPE OF PROGRAM: ASSEMBLY<br />

DISTRICT/ SCHOOL: HENDRICK HUDSON/FURNACE WOODS ELEM.<br />

# OF TEACHERS: 10 # OF STUDENTS: 240 GRADE(S) K-5<br />

DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 4/27/12<br />

NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />

STANDARD 1 STANDARD 2 STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4 X<br />

ARTIST: DARIUS KAUFMANN<br />

CONTRACT #: A7756<br />

TITLE OF PROGRAM: DARIUS KAUFMANN - JOURNEYS WITH SOUND -<br />

MUSIC OF THE EARTH<br />

TYPE OF PROGRAM: ASSEMBLY<br />

DISTRICT/ SCHOOL:<br />

CROTON/CET ELEM.<br />

# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />

# OF STUDENTS: 620 GRADE(S) K-4<br />

DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 12/5/11<br />

NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />

STANDARD 1 STANDARD 2 STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4 X<br />

1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />

1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />

2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />

3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />

4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />

5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />

6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />

7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />

WHEN THEY WERE PLAYING THE STUDENTS WERE CAPTIVATED.<br />

8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />

SOMETIMES THE SPEAKING PARTS WERE A LITTLE LONG.<br />

9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />

IT WAS A GREAT ASSEMBLY.<br />

ARTIST: DARIUS KAUFMANN<br />

CONTRACT #: A8393<br />

TITLE OF PROGRAM: JOURNEYS WITH SOUND - MUSIC OF THE EARTH<br />

TYPE OF PROGRAM: ASSEMBLY<br />

DISTRICT/ SCHOOL:<br />

EASTCHESTER/GREENVALE ELEM.<br />

# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />

# OF STUDENTS: 142 GRADE(S) 3<br />

DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE<br />

4/9/12<br />

NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />

STANDARD 1 STANDARD 2 STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4 X<br />

5<br />

5<br />

4<br />

5<br />

5<br />

4<br />

1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />

1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />

1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />

2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />

3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />

4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />

5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />

6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />

7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />

THE CHILDREN WERE ENGAGED AND THEY WERE EAGER<br />

PARTICIPANTS. THE CHILDREN WERE VERY CALM AND RELAXED<br />

WHEN THEY RETURNED TO CLASS.<br />

8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />

IT WAS A GOOD PROGRAM BUT IT DID NOT EMPHASIZE "TAKING<br />

CARE OF THE EARTH" AS I HAD HOPED.<br />

9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />

WHEN THE STUDENTS WERE ASKED QUESTIONS, THEY BECAME<br />

DISTRACTED AND WERE NOT REFOCUSED BY PRESENTER.<br />

4.5<br />

4.9<br />

4.2<br />

4.7<br />

4.6<br />

N/<br />

1.<br />

2.<br />

3.<br />

4.<br />

5.<br />

6.<br />

STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />

ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />

EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />

ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />

TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />

QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />

DARIUS HAS A GREAT KNOWLEDGE OF MUSIC AND INSTRUMENTS<br />

FROM AROUND THE WORLD, AND ENGAGED THE CHILDREN.<br />

8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />

NONE<br />

9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />

NONE<br />

Arts in Education Service - School Evaluations <strong>2011</strong>-<strong>2012</strong><br />

Page 79 of 332


ARTIST: DARIUS KAUFMANN<br />

CONTRACT #: A8141<br />

TITLE OF PROGRAM: JOURNEYS WITH SOUND - WINTER SOLSTICE<br />

WORLD MUSIC<br />

TYPE OF PROGRAM: ASSEMBLY<br />

DISTRICT/ SCHOOL: NEW ROCHELLE/DAVIS ELEM. SCHOOL<br />

# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />

# OF STUDENTS: 700 GRADE(S) K-5<br />

DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 12/15/11<br />

NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />

STANDARD 1 STANDARD 2 STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4 X<br />

1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />

ARTIST: DARIUS KAUFMANN<br />

CONTRACT #: A8848<br />

TITLE OF PROGRAM: JOURNEYS WITH SOUND - WORLD MUSIC<br />

TYPE OF PROGRAM: ASSEMBLY<br />

DISTRICT/ SCHOOL: NEW ROCHELLE/DAVIS ELEM. SCHOOL<br />

# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />

# OF STUDENTS: 700 GRADE(S) K-5<br />

DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 5/15/12<br />

NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />

STANDARD 1 STANDARD 2 STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4 X<br />

1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />

1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />

2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />

3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />

4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />

5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />

6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />

7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />

THERE WAS A REAL EARTH CONNECTION TO INDIGENIOUS<br />

MUSICAL INSTRUMENTS.<br />

8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />

NONE<br />

9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />

DARIUS WAS WONDERFUL WITH THE CHILDREN AND VERY<br />

INTERACTIVE.<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />

2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />

3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />

4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />

5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />

6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />

7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />

THE MUSIC PERFORMANCE WAS UNIQUE. DARIUS HAD AN<br />

ENGAGING, GENTLE MANNER.<br />

8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />

NONE<br />

9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />

EXCELLENT.<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

ARTIST: DAVID ADLER<br />

CONTRACT #: A8490<br />

TITLE OF PROGRAM: AUTHOR/ILLUSTRATOR VISIT<br />

TYPE OF PROGRAM: ASSEMBLY<br />

DISTRICT/ SCHOOL:<br />

# OF TEACHERS: 4<br />

NORTH SALEM/PQ ELEM.<br />

# OF STUDENTS: 80 GRADE(S) 1<br />

DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 3/20/12<br />

NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />

STANDARD 1 STANDARD 2 STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />

ARTIST: DAVID ADLER<br />

CONTRACT #: A7575<br />

TITLE OF PROGRAM: AUTHOR/ILLUSTRATOR VISIT<br />

TYPE OF PROGRAM: ASSEMBLY<br />

DISTRICT/ SCHOOL:<br />

# OF TEACHERS: 7<br />

BYRAM HILLS/COMAN HILL ELEM.<br />

# OF STUDENTS: 400 GRADE(S) 1 & 2<br />

DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 2/6 & 7/12<br />

NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />

STANDARD 1 STANDARD 2 STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />

1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />

1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />

1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />

2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />

3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />

4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />

5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />

6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />

2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />

3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />

4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />

5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />

6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />

5<br />

4<br />

4<br />

4<br />

4<br />

4<br />

7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />

EXCELLENT PRESENTER. ENGAGED STUDENTS AND<br />

PRESENTATION WAS APPROPRIATE LEVEL FOR STUDENTS.<br />

8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />

NONE<br />

9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />

NONE<br />

7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />

HE WAS WONDERFUL WITH THE STUDENTS. HIS INTERACTION<br />

WITH BOTH THE STUDENTS AND TEACHERS WAS FANTASTIC.<br />

8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />

NONE<br />

9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />

NONE<br />

Arts in Education Service - School Evaluations <strong>2011</strong>-<strong>2012</strong><br />

Page 80 of 332


ARTIST: DAVID B. JOHNSON<br />

CONTRACT #: A8306<br />

TITLE OF PROGRAM: ACCOMPANIST FOR THE SHOW - GUYS & DOLLS<br />

TYPE OF PROGRAM: ASSEMBLY/RESIDENCY<br />

DISTRICT/ SCHOOL: KATONAH/LEWISBORO/JOHN JAY HIGH SCHOOL<br />

# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />

# OF STUDENTS: 150 GRADE(S) 9-12<br />

DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 2/1-3/22/12<br />

NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />

STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />

1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />

ARTIST: DAVID BARANOWSKI<br />

CONTRACT #: A7532<br />

TITLE OF PROGRAM: PIANIST FOR THE SHOW - THE DROWSY<br />

CHAPERSONE<br />

TYPE OF PROGRAM: ASSEMBLY<br />

DISTRICT/ SCHOOL: CHAPPAQUA/HORACE GREELEY HIGH SCHOOL<br />

# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />

# OF STUDENTS: 27 GRADE(S) 9-12<br />

DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 9/12-11/19/11<br />

NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />

STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />

1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />

1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />

2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />

3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />

4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />

5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />

6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />

7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />

NONE<br />

8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />

NONE<br />

9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />

NONE<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

1.<br />

2.<br />

3.<br />

4.<br />

5.<br />

6.<br />

STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />

ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />

EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />

ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />

TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />

QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

N/<br />

7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />

DAVE IS A FANTASTIC MUSICIAN. A PLEASURE TO WORK WITH AND<br />

THE STUDENTS ADORE HIM.<br />

8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />

NONE<br />

9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />

I LOOK FORWARD TO WORKING WITH DAVE AGAIN.<br />

ARTIST: DAVID BECKER<br />

CONTRACT #: A8627<br />

TITLE OF PROGRAM: DIGITAL DOCUMENTARY FILM<br />

TYPE OF PROGRAM: WORKSHOP<br />

DISTRICT/ SCHOOL: HASTINGS/FARRAGUT MIDDLE SCHOOL<br />

# OF TEACHERS: 3<br />

# OF STUDENTS: 114 GRADE(S) 7<br />

DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 2/28-3/15/12<br />

NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />

STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 X STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4 X<br />

ARTIST: DAVID KLOTZLE<br />

CONTRACT #: A8734<br />

TITLE OF PROGRAM: NATIVE AMERICAN STORIES<br />

TYPE OF PROGRAM: RESIDENCY<br />

DISTRICT/ SCHOOL:<br />

# OF TEACHERS: 3<br />

PEEKSKILL/WOODSIDE ELEM.<br />

# OF STUDENTS: 200 GRADE(S) PRE K-1<br />

DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 4/9-17/12<br />

NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />

STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 X STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4 X<br />

1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />

1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />

1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />

2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />

3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />

4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />

5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />

6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />

2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />

3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />

4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />

5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />

6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />

THIS PROGRAM WAS THOUGHT PROVOKING AND GREATLY<br />

ENHANCED THE STUDENTS UNDERSTANDING OF THE<br />

DOCUMENTARY FILM PROCESS AND THE U.S. CONSTITUTION.<br />

8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />

NONE<br />

9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />

WE TRULY ENJOYED WORKING WITH DAVID.<br />

7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />

ALWAYS WONDERFUL. KEEPS THE STUDENTS MOTIVATED AND<br />

INTERESTED.<br />

8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />

NONE<br />

9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />

NONE<br />

Arts in Education Service - School Evaluations <strong>2011</strong>-<strong>2012</strong><br />

Page 81 of 332


ARTIST: DAVID KLOTZLE<br />

CONTRACT #: A8239<br />

TITLE OF PROGRAM: WINTER STORIES<br />

TYPE OF PROGRAM: ASSEMBLY/WORKSHOP<br />

DISTRICT/ SCHOOL:<br />

# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />

PEEKSKILL/OAKSIDE ELEM.<br />

# OF STUDENTS: GRADE(S) 2 & 3<br />

DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 1/9-18/12<br />

NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />

STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 X STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4 X<br />

1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />

ARTIST: DAVID PRATT<br />

CONTRACT #: A8653<br />

TITLE OF PROGRAM: TRUMPET PLAYER FOR THE SHOW - A FUNNY THING<br />

HAPPENED ON THE WAY TO THE FORUM<br />

TYPE OF PROGRAM: ASSEMBLY<br />

DISTRICT/ SCHOOL: PUTNAM VALLEY/PUTNAM VALLEY HIGH SCHOOL<br />

# OF TEACHERS: 3<br />

# OF STUDENTS: 400 GRADE(S) 9-12<br />

DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 4/13-23/12<br />

NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />

STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />

1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />

1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />

2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />

3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />

4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />

5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />

6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />

7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />

NONE<br />

8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />

NONE<br />

9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />

NONE<br />

4<br />

5<br />

4<br />

4<br />

N/<br />

N/<br />

1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />

2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />

3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />

4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />

5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />

6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />

7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />

NONE<br />

8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />

NONE<br />

9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />

NONE<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

ARTIST: DAVID RADOVICH<br />

CONTRACT #: A8534<br />

TITLE OF PROGRAM: FLUTE PLAYER FOR THE SHOW - ONCE UPON A<br />

MATTRESS<br />

TYPE OF PROGRAM: ASSEMBLY<br />

DISTRICT/ SCHOOL:<br />

# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />

SOMERS/SOMERS HIGH SCHOOL<br />

# OF STUDENTS: 50 GRADE(S) 9-12<br />

DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 3/12-18/12<br />

NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />

STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />

ARTIST: DAVID RADOVICH<br />

CONTRACT #: A8648<br />

TITLE OF PROGRAM: REED PLAYER FOR THE SHOW - A FUNNY THING<br />

HAPPENED ON THE WAY TO THE FORUM<br />

TYPE OF PROGRAM: ASSEMBLY<br />

DISTRICT/ SCHOOL: PUTNAM VALLEY/PUTNAM VALLEY HIGH SCHOOL<br />

# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />

# OF STUDENTS: 400 GRADE(S) 9-12<br />

DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 4/13-23/12<br />

NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />

STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />

1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />

1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />

1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />

2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />

3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />

4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />

5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />

6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />

2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />

3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />

4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />

5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />

6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM?<br />

NONE<br />

Y<br />

WHY?<br />

7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM?<br />

NONE<br />

Y<br />

WHY?<br />

8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />

NONE<br />

9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />

NONE<br />

8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />

NONE<br />

9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />

NONE<br />

Arts in Education Service - School Evaluations <strong>2011</strong>-<strong>2012</strong><br />

Page 82 of 332


ARTIST: DAVID RADOVICH<br />

CONTRACT #: A8671<br />

TITLE OF PROGRAM: REED PLAYER FOR THE SHOW - GUYS & DOLLS<br />

TYPE OF PROGRAM: ASSEMBLY<br />

DISTRICT/ SCHOOL: KATONAH/LEWISBORO/JOHN JAY HIGH SCHOOL<br />

# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />

# OF STUDENTS: 150 GRADE(S) 9-12<br />

DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 3/22-24/12<br />

NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />

STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />

ARTIST: DAVID SEXTON<br />

CONTRACT #: A8764<br />

TITLE OF PROGRAM: LIGHTING DESIGNER FOR THE SHOW - OUR TOWN<br />

TYPE OF PROGRAM: RESIDENCY<br />

DISTRICT/ SCHOOL: CHAPPAQUA/HORACE GREELEY HIGH SCHOOL<br />

# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />

# OF STUDENTS: 22 GRADE(S) 9-12<br />

DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 4/23-5/5/12<br />

NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />

STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 X STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />

1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />

1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />

1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />

2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />

3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />

4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />

5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />

6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />

2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />

3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />

4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />

5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />

6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM?<br />

NONE<br />

8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />

NONE<br />

9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />

NONE<br />

Y<br />

WHY?<br />

7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />

DAVID IS A FANTASTIC DESIGNER AND WORKS WELL WITH THE<br />

STUDENTS.<br />

8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />

NONE<br />

9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />

NONE<br />

ARTIST: DAVID SEXTON<br />

CONTRACT #: A7774<br />

TITLE OF PROGRAM: LIGHTING DESIGNER FOR THE SHOW - THE DROWSY<br />

CHAPERONE<br />

TYPE OF PROGRAM: RESIDENCY<br />

DISTRICT/ SCHOOL: CHAPPAQUA/HORACE GREELEY HIGH SCHOOL<br />

# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />

# OF STUDENTS: 25 GRADE(S) 9-12<br />

DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 11/4-19/11<br />

NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />

STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 X STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />

1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />

ARTIST: DAVID SEXTON<br />

CONTRACT #: A8556<br />

TITLE OF PROGRAM: LIGHTING DESIGNER FOR THE SHOW - XANADU<br />

TYPE OF PROGRAM: RESIDENCY<br />

DISTRICT/ SCHOOL: CHAPPAQUA/HORACE GREELEY HIGH SCHOOL<br />

# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />

# OF STUDENTS: 200 GRADE(S) 12<br />

DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 4/19-21/12<br />

NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />

STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 X STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />

1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />

1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />

2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />

3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />

4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />

5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />

6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />

7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />

DAVID IS A GIFTED ARTIST.<br />

8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />

NONE<br />

9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />

LOOK FORWARD TO WORKING WITH HIM AGAIN.<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

1.<br />

2.<br />

3.<br />

4.<br />

5.<br />

6.<br />

STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />

ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />

EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />

ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />

TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />

QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />

IMPORTANT FOR STUDENTS TO SEE HOW ALL THE COMPONENTS<br />

OF A MUSICAL SHOW ARE DESIGNED, CREATED AND COME<br />

TOGETHER.<br />

8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />

NONE<br />

9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />

TALENTED LIGHTING DESIGNER AND THE STUDENTS ENJOYED<br />

WORKING WITH AND LEARNING FROM DAVID.<br />

Arts in Education Service - School Evaluations <strong>2011</strong>-<strong>2012</strong><br />

Page 83 of 332


ARTIST: DAVID WALSH<br />

CONTRACT #: A7684<br />

TITLE OF PROGRAM: SET DESIGN & CONSTRUCTION FOR THE FALL SHOW<br />

TYPE OF PROGRAM: RESIDENCY<br />

DISTRICT/ SCHOOL: KATONAH/LEWISBORO/JOHN JAY HIGH SCHOOL<br />

# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />

# OF STUDENTS: 400 GRADE(S) 9-12<br />

DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 10/24-11/16/11<br />

NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />

STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 X STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />

1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />

ARTIST: DAVID WALSH<br />

CONTRACT #: A8309<br />

TITLE OF PROGRAM: SET DESIGN & CONSTRUCTION FOR THE SHOW -<br />

GUYS & DOLLS<br />

TYPE OF PROGRAM: RESIDENCY<br />

DISTRICT/ SCHOOL: KATONAH/LEWISBORO/JOHN JAY HIGH SCHOOL<br />

# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />

# OF STUDENTS: 50 GRADE(S) 9-12<br />

DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 2/1-3/22/12<br />

NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />

STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 X STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />

1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />

1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />

2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />

3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />

4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />

5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />

6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />

7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />

NONE<br />

8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />

NONE<br />

9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />

NONE<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />

2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />

3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />

4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />

5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />

6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />

7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />

NONE<br />

8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />

NONE<br />

9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />

NONE<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

ARTIST: DAVID WALSH<br />

CONTRACT #: A8839<br />

TITLE OF PROGRAM: SET DESIGN & CONSTRUCTION FOR THE SPRING<br />

CONCERTS<br />

TYPE OF PROGRAM: RESIDENCY<br />

DISTRICT/ SCHOOL: KATONAH/LEWISBORO/JOHN JAY HIGH SCHOOL<br />

# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />

# OF STUDENTS: 450 GRADE(S) 9-12<br />

DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 5/23-6/4/12<br />

NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />

STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 X STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />

ARTIST: DAVID WALSH<br />

CONTRACT #: A8163<br />

TITLE OF PROGRAM: SET DESIGN & CONSTRUCTION FOR THE WINTER<br />

CONCERT<br />

TYPE OF PROGRAM: RESIDENCY<br />

DISTRICT/ SCHOOL: KATONAH/LEWISBORO/JOHN JAY HIGH SCHOOL<br />

# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />

# OF STUDENTS: 400 GRADE(S) 9-12<br />

DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 1/9-30/12<br />

NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />

STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 X STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />

1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />

1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />

1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />

2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />

3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />

4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />

5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />

6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />

2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />

3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />

4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />

5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />

6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM?<br />

NONE<br />

Y<br />

WHY?<br />

7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM?<br />

NONE<br />

Y<br />

WHY?<br />

8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />

NONE<br />

9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />

NONE<br />

8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />

NONE<br />

9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />

NONE<br />

Arts in Education Service - School Evaluations <strong>2011</strong>-<strong>2012</strong><br />

Page 84 of 332


ARTIST: DAVID ZUCKER<br />

CONTRACT #: A8685<br />

TITLE OF PROGRAM: POETRY IN MOTION<br />

TYPE OF PROGRAM: ASSEMBLY<br />

DISTRICT/ SCHOOL: LAKELAND/THOMAS JEFFERSON ELEM.<br />

# OF TEACHERS: 2<br />

# OF STUDENTS: 125 GRADE(S) 1 & 2<br />

DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 3/19/12<br />

NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />

STANDARD 1 STANDARD 2 STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />

ARTIST: DAVYD H. SUBER, JR.<br />

CONTRACT #: A8221<br />

TITLE OF PROGRAM: CHOREOGRAPHER FOR THE WINTER MUSICAL<br />

TYPE OF PROGRAM: RESIDENCY<br />

DISTRICT/ SCHOOL: BRIARCLIFF/BRIARCLIFF HIGH SCHOOL<br />

# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />

# OF STUDENTS: 40 GRADE(S) 9-12<br />

DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 1/5-3/11/12<br />

NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />

STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 X STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />

1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />

1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />

1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />

2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />

3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />

4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />

5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />

6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />

7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />

HE WAS ENGAGING. HE EXPLAINED POETRY TO MAKE IT ENTICING<br />

FOR YOUNG CHILDREN. THE CHILDREN UNDERSTOOD THE<br />

MESSAGE HE WAS CONVEYING.<br />

8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />

REMIND TEACHERS TO VISIT WEBSITE PRIOR TO VISIT. THAT IS<br />

WHERE THE SUPPORT MATERIALS FOR THE PROGRAM IS FOUND.<br />

9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />

THE SHOW WAS ENJOYED BY STUDENTS AND TEACHERS.<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />

2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />

3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />

4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />

5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />

6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />

7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />

HIS KNOWLEDGE, MANNERS AND ENTHUSIAM WAS GREATLY<br />

APPRECIATED.<br />

8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />

NONE<br />

9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />

NONE<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

ARTIST: DEBORAH FEINSTEIN<br />

CONTRACT #: A8299<br />

TITLE OF PROGRAM: DRAMA CLASS PLAY PRODUCTION<br />

TYPE OF PROGRAM: RESIDENCY<br />

DISTRICT/ SCHOOL: KATONAH/LEWISBORO/LEWISBORO ELEM.<br />

# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />

# OF STUDENTS: GRADE(S) 4 & 5<br />

DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 1/20-3/29/12<br />

NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />

STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 X STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />

ARTIST: DEBORAH FEINSTEIN<br />

CONTRACT #: A8769<br />

TITLE OF PROGRAM: THEATRE GAMES<br />

TYPE OF PROGRAM: WORKSHOP<br />

DISTRICT/ SCHOOL: KATONAH/LEWISBORO/LEWISBORO ELEM.<br />

# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />

# OF STUDENTS: GRADE(S) 3-5<br />

DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 4/25-5/30/12<br />

NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />

STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 X STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />

1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />

1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />

1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />

2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />

3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />

4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />

5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />

6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />

7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />

DEBBIE BROUGHT THE CONCEPT OF A SCHOOL PLAY TO A<br />

DIFFERENT LEVEL.<br />

8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />

NONE<br />

9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />

THE CHILDREN ALL HAD A GREAT TIME. THEY LEARNED A LOT AND<br />

I SAW A LOT OF BRIGHT SMILES ON STAGE.<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

1.<br />

2.<br />

3.<br />

4.<br />

5.<br />

6.<br />

STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />

ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />

EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />

ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />

TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />

QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

4<br />

7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />

DEBBIE IS A GREAT PROFESSIONAL WHO TAKES THEATRE VERY<br />

SERIOUS AND REALLY WANTS TO TEACH THE CHILDREN<br />

SOMETHING IN A VERY PLAYFUL WAY.<br />

8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />

NONE<br />

9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />

NONE<br />

Arts in Education Service - School Evaluations <strong>2011</strong>-<strong>2012</strong><br />

Page 85 of 332


ARTIST: DEBRA DASHNAW<br />

CONTRACT #: A8330<br />

TITLE OF PROGRAM: FLUTE & PICCOLO PLAYER FOR THE SHOW - MY FAIR<br />

LADY<br />

TYPE OF PROGRAM: ASSEMBLY<br />

DISTRICT/ SCHOOL: LAKELAND/WALTER PANAS HIGH SCHOOL<br />

# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />

# OF STUDENTS: 200 GRADE(S) 9-12<br />

DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 4/30-5/5/12<br />

NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />

STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />

ARTIST: DEBRA DASHNAW<br />

CONTRACT #: A7715<br />

TITLE OF PROGRAM: REED PLAYER FOR THE SHOW - ANNIE GET YOUR<br />

GUN<br />

TYPE OF PROGRAM: ASSEMBLY<br />

DISTRICT/ SCHOOL: LAKELAND/WALTER PANAS HIGH SCHOOL<br />

# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />

# OF STUDENTS: 100 GRADE(S) 9-12<br />

DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 11/14-19/11<br />

NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />

STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />

1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />

1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />

1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />

2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />

3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />

4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />

5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />

6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />

2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />

3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />

4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />

5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />

6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM?<br />

NONE<br />

Y<br />

WHY?<br />

7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM?<br />

NONE<br />

Y<br />

WHY?<br />

8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />

NONE<br />

9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />

NONE<br />

8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />

NONE<br />

9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />

NONE<br />

ARTIST: DEBRA HAMPTON<br />

CONTRACT #: A7825<br />

TITLE OF PROGRAM: CREATIVE PROCESS WORKSHOPS<br />

TYPE OF PROGRAM: WORKSHOP<br />

DISTRICT/ SCHOOL: NEW ROCHELLE/NEW ROCHELLE HS<br />

# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />

# OF STUDENTS: 80 GRADE(S) 9-12<br />

DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 10/19/11<br />

NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />

STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 X STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />

1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />

ARTIST: DEBRA SAUTNER<br />

CONTRACT #: A7714<br />

TITLE OF PROGRAM: BASS PLAYER FOR THE SHOW - ANNIE GET YOUR<br />

GUN<br />

TYPE OF PROGRAM: ASSEMBLY<br />

DISTRICT/ SCHOOL: LAKELAND/WALTER PANAS HIGH SCHOOL<br />

# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />

# OF STUDENTS: 100 GRADE(S) 9-12<br />

DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 11/14-19/11<br />

NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />

STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />

1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />

1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />

2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />

3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />

4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />

5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />

6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />

7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />

SPOKE CLEARLY, EXPLAINED STEP BY STEP WORK PROCESS<br />

WELL, GREAT SAMPLES OF 2D, 3D AND GRAPHIC WORKS.<br />

8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />

NONE<br />

9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />

THE STUDENTS LOVED HER. THEY ASKED FOR AUTOGRAPHS.<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />

2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />

3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />

4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />

5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />

6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />

7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />

DEBRA IS A TRUE PROFESSIONAL.<br />

8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />

NONE<br />

9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />

NONE<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

Arts in Education Service - School Evaluations <strong>2011</strong>-<strong>2012</strong><br />

Page 86 of 332


ARTIST: DEBRA SAUTNER<br />

CONTRACT #: A8329<br />

TITLE OF PROGRAM: BASS PLAYER FOR THE SHOW - MY FAIR LADY<br />

TYPE OF PROGRAM: ASSEMBLY<br />

DISTRICT/ SCHOOL: LAKELAND/WALTER PANAS HIGH SCHOOL<br />

# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />

# OF STUDENTS: 200 GRADE(S) 9-12<br />

DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 4/30-5/5/12<br />

NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />

STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />

ARTIST: DENISE BLACK<br />

CONTRACT #: A8020<br />

TITLE OF PROGRAM: COSTUME DESIGNER FOR JAZZ CO SHOW<br />

TYPE OF PROGRAM: RESIDENCY<br />

DISTRICT/ SCHOOL: TUCKAHOE/TUCKAHOE HIGH SCHOOL<br />

# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />

# OF STUDENTS: 60 GRADE(S) 9-12<br />

DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 11/28/11-3/3/12<br />

NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />

STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 X STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />

1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />

1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />

1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />

2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />

3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />

4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />

5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />

6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />

7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />

NONE<br />

8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />

NONE<br />

9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />

NONE<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

1.<br />

2.<br />

3.<br />

4.<br />

5.<br />

6.<br />

STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />

ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />

EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />

ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />

TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />

QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />

EXCELLENT WINTER PROGRAM FOR ARTS EDUCATION, PHYSICAL<br />

ACTIVITY.<br />

8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />

NONE<br />

9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />

NONE<br />

ARTIST: DENISE SCHIRMER<br />

CONTRACT #: A7569<br />

TITLE OF PROGRAM: INDIAN STORIES & ARTIFACTS / THE BEAVER FUR<br />

TRADE TALES<br />

TYPE OF PROGRAM: ASSEMBLY<br />

DISTRICT/ SCHOOL: EASTCHESTER/GREENVALE ELEM.<br />

# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />

# OF STUDENTS: 155 GRADE(S) 4<br />

DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 2/10/12<br />

NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />

STANDARD 1 STANDARD 2 STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4 X<br />

1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />

ARTIST: DIANA ENGEL<br />

CONTRACT #: A7605<br />

TITLE OF PROGRAM: AUTHOR VISIT<br />

TYPE OF PROGRAM: ASSEMBLY<br />

DISTRICT/ SCHOOL: HENDRICK HUDSON/FURNACE WOODS ELEM.<br />

# OF TEACHERS: 2<br />

# OF STUDENTS: 40 GRADE(S) 1<br />

DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 11/22/11<br />

NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />

STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />

1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />

1.<br />

2.<br />

3.<br />

4.<br />

5.<br />

6.<br />

STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />

ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />

EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />

ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />

TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />

QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />

4<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />

EXCELLENT PROGRAM. VERY INFORMATIVE AND EDUCATIONAL..<br />

8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />

NONE<br />

9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />

NONE<br />

1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />

2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />

3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />

4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />

5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />

6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />

7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />

IT'S ESPECIALLY A GOOD KICK-OFF TO TEACH THE CHILDREN<br />

ABOUT BOOKMAKING.<br />

8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />

NONE<br />

9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />

WE LOVE DIANA'S VISIT.<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

Arts in Education Service - School Evaluations <strong>2011</strong>-<strong>2012</strong><br />

Page 87 of 332


ARTIST: DIANA SELENOW<br />

CONTRACT #: A8300<br />

TITLE OF PROGRAM: DIRECTOR FOR SPRING MUSICAL - BYE, BYE BIRDIE<br />

TYPE OF PROGRAM: RESIDENCY<br />

DISTRICT/ SCHOOL: IRVINGTON/IRVINGTON HIGH SCHOOL<br />

# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />

# OF STUDENTS: GRADE(S) 9-12<br />

DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 1/17-3/17/12<br />

NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />

STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 X STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />

ARTIST: DIANA SELENOW<br />

CONTRACT #: A7633<br />

TITLE OF PROGRAM: DIRECTOR FOR SPRING MUSICAL - WIZARD OF OZ<br />

TYPE OF PROGRAM: RESIDENCY<br />

DISTRICT/ SCHOOL: IRVINGTON/IRVINGTON HIGH SCHOOL<br />

# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />

# OF STUDENTS: 50 GRADE(S) 9-12<br />

DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 9/19-11/6/11<br />

NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />

STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 X STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />

1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />

1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />

1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />

2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />

3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />

4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />

5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />

6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />

7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />

NONE<br />

8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />

NONE<br />

9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />

NONE<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

1.<br />

2.<br />

3.<br />

4.<br />

5.<br />

6.<br />

STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />

ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />

EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />

ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />

TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />

QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />

DIANA HAS BEEN DOING THE SCHOOL PLAYS FOR 16 YEARS. SHE<br />

PUTS A LOT OF HER OWN TIME AND EXPENSES IN MAKING<br />

COSTUMES FOR EACH PERFORMANCE.<br />

8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />

NONE<br />

9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />

NONE<br />

ARTIST: DIANE WENDEL<br />

CONTRACT #: A8201A<br />

TITLE OF PROGRAM: COMPUTER GRAPHIC ARTS<br />

TYPE OF PROGRAM: WORKSHOP<br />

DISTRICT/ SCHOOL: CHAPPAQUA/ROARING BROOK ELEM.<br />

# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />

# OF STUDENTS: 9 GRADE(S) 3 & 4<br />

DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 1/10-3/6/12<br />

NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />

STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 X STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />

ARTIST: DIANE WENDEL<br />

CONTRACT #: A8201B<br />

TITLE OF PROGRAM: COMPUTER GRAPHIC DESIGN<br />

TYPE OF PROGRAM: WORKSHOP<br />

DISTRICT/ SCHOOL: CHAPPAQUA/ROARING BROOK ELEM.<br />

# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />

# OF STUDENTS: 10 GRADE(S) 1 & 2<br />

DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 1/12-3/8/12<br />

NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />

STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 X STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />

1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />

1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />

1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />

2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />

3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />

4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />

5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />

6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />

4<br />

4<br />

4<br />

4<br />

4<br />

4<br />

1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />

2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />

3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />

4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />

5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />

6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />

4<br />

4<br />

4<br />

4<br />

4<br />

4<br />

7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM?<br />

DIANE IS A WONDERFUL INSTRUCTOR.<br />

Y<br />

WHY?<br />

7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />

DIANE IS A COMMITTED KNOWLEDGEABLE INSTRUCTOR.<br />

8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />

NONE<br />

9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />

NONE<br />

8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />

NONE<br />

9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />

NONE<br />

Arts in Education Service - School Evaluations <strong>2011</strong>-<strong>2012</strong><br />

Page 88 of 332


ARTIST: DIANE WENDEL<br />

CONTRACT #: A8186<br />

TITLE OF PROGRAM: THEATRE ENRICHMENT<br />

TYPE OF PROGRAM: WORKSHOP<br />

DISTRICT/ SCHOOL: CHAPPAQUA/SEVEN BRIDGES MIDDLE SCHOOL<br />

# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />

# OF STUDENTS: 97 GRADE(S) 5-8<br />

DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 1/3-2/12/12<br />

NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />

STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 X STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />

ARTIST: DINA MICHELLE SCIALLO dba DANCE EM CONTRACT #: A8036<br />

TITLE OF PROGRAM: HIP HOP<br />

TYPE OF PROGRAM: WORKSHOP<br />

DISTRICT/ SCHOOL:<br />

# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />

CHAPPAQUA/GRAFFLIN ELEM.<br />

# OF STUDENTS: 9 GRADE(S) 2-4<br />

DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 1/11-3/28/12<br />

NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />

STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 X STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4 X<br />

1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />

1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />

1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />

2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />

3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />

4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />

5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />

6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />

7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />

NONE<br />

8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />

NONE<br />

9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />

NONE<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

1.<br />

2.<br />

3.<br />

4.<br />

5.<br />

6.<br />

STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />

ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />

EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />

ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />

TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />

QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />

2<br />

2<br />

2<br />

4<br />

3<br />

3<br />

7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />

DINA WAS A BUBBLY, HAPPY AND INFLUENTIAL INSTRUCTOR BUT<br />

CURRICULUM NEEDS INSPIRATION AND NEEDS TO BE BROUGHT UP<br />

TO AGE LEVEL.<br />

8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />

PERHAPS END OF YEAR PERFORMANCE FOR PARENTS.<br />

9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />

NONE<br />

ARTIST: DJUAN JAE GRANT<br />

CONTRACT #: A8028<br />

TITLE OF PROGRAM: SOUND DESIGNER FOR JAZZ CO SHOW<br />

TYPE OF PROGRAM: RESIDENCY<br />

DISTRICT/ SCHOOL: TUCKAHOE/TUCKAHOE HIGH SCHOOL<br />

# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />

# OF STUDENTS: 60 GRADE(S) 9-12<br />

DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 2/28-3/3/12<br />

NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />

STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 X STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />

ARTIST: DONALD COOKSEY<br />

CONTRACT #: A8841<br />

TITLE OF PROGRAM: BASS PLAYER FOR THE SHOW - PETER PAN<br />

TYPE OF PROGRAM: ASSEMBLY<br />

DISTRICT/ SCHOOL: CHAPPAQUA/ROARING BROOK ELEM.<br />

# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />

# OF STUDENTS: 113 GRADE(S) 2-4<br />

DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 5/30-6/3/12<br />

NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />

STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />

1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />

1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />

1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />

2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />

3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />

4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />

5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />

6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

N/<br />

1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />

2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />

3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />

4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />

5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />

6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

N/<br />

7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />

SOUND AND LIGHTING ARE IMPORTANT IN ANY THEATRE<br />

PRODUCTION.<br />

8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />

NONE<br />

9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />

NONE<br />

7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM?<br />

NONE<br />

8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />

NONE<br />

9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />

VERY ACCOMODATING AND A PLEASURE TO WORK WITH.<br />

Y<br />

WHY?<br />

Arts in Education Service - School Evaluations <strong>2011</strong>-<strong>2012</strong><br />

Page 89 of 332


ARTIST: DONNA CAREW<br />

CONTRACT #: A8060<br />

TITLE OF PROGRAM: SCRAPBOOKING<br />

TYPE OF PROGRAM: WORKSHOP<br />

DISTRICT/ SCHOOL:<br />

# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />

PELHAM/PROSPECT HILL ELEM.<br />

# OF STUDENTS: 10 GRADE(S) 3-5<br />

DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 1/12-3/8/12<br />

NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />

STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 X STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />

1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />

ARTIST: DONNA KOVACS<br />

CONTRACT #: A8248<br />

TITLE OF PROGRAM: COSTUME DESIGNER FOR THE SHOW - THE<br />

DROWSY CHAPERONE<br />

TYPE OF PROGRAM: RESIDENCY<br />

DISTRICT/ SCHOOL: KATONAH/LEWISBORO/JOHN JAY MIDDLE SCHOOL<br />

# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />

# OF STUDENTS: 75 GRADE(S) 6-8<br />

DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 1/15-3/15/12<br />

NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />

STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 X STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />

1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />

1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />

2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />

3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />

4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />

5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />

6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />

7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />

NONE<br />

8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />

NONE<br />

9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />

NONE<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

N/<br />

1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />

2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />

3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />

4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />

5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />

6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />

7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />

DONNA'S COSTUMES WERE AMAZING. WE LOOK FORWARD TO<br />

WORKING WITH HER AGAIN.<br />

8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />

NONE<br />

9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />

NONE<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

N/<br />

ARTIST: DONNA ROSS<br />

CONTRACT #: A7610A<br />

TITLE OF PROGRAM: CARTOONING<br />

TYPE OF PROGRAM: WORKSHOP<br />

DISTRICT/ SCHOOL:<br />

# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />

PELHAM/SIWANOY ELEM.<br />

# OF STUDENTS: 15 GRADE(S) K-5<br />

DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 10/4-11/29/11<br />

NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />

STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 X STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />

ARTIST: DONNA ROSS<br />

CONTRACT #: A8357A<br />

TITLE OF PROGRAM: CARTOONING<br />

TYPE OF PROGRAM: WORKSHOP<br />

DISTRICT/ SCHOOL:<br />

# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />

PELHAM/SIWANOY ELEM.<br />

# OF STUDENTS: 11 GRADE(S) K-2<br />

DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 1/31-3/26/12<br />

NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />

STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 X STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />

1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />

1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />

1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />

2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />

3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />

4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />

5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />

6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />

2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />

3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />

4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />

5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />

6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />

4<br />

4<br />

4<br />

4<br />

4<br />

4<br />

7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM?<br />

NONE<br />

Y<br />

WHY?<br />

7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM?<br />

NONE<br />

Y<br />

WHY?<br />

8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />

NONE<br />

9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />

NONE<br />

8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />

NONE<br />

9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />

NONE<br />

Arts in Education Service - School Evaluations <strong>2011</strong>-<strong>2012</strong><br />

Page 90 of 332


ARTIST: DONNA ROSS<br />

CONTRACT #: A8357B<br />

TITLE OF PROGRAM: CLAY CREATIONS<br />

TYPE OF PROGRAM: WORKSHOP<br />

DISTRICT/ SCHOOL:<br />

# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />

PELHAM/SIWANOY ELEM.<br />

# OF STUDENTS: 11 GRADE(S) 3-5<br />

DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 2/1-4/4/12<br />

NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />

STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 X STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />

ARTIST: DONNA ROSS<br />

CONTRACT #: A8062<br />

TITLE OF PROGRAM: CLAY CREATIONS<br />

TYPE OF PROGRAM: WORKSHOP<br />

DISTRICT/ SCHOOL:<br />

# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />

PELHAM/PROSPECT HILL ELEM.<br />

# OF STUDENTS: 14 GRADE(S) K-2<br />

DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 1/13-3/9/12<br />

NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />

STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 X STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />

1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />

1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />

1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />

2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />

3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />

4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />

5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />

6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />

4<br />

4<br />

4<br />

4<br />

4<br />

4<br />

1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />

2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />

3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />

4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />

5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />

6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

N/<br />

7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM?<br />

NONE<br />

Y<br />

WHY?<br />

7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM?<br />

NONE<br />

Y<br />

WHY?<br />

8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />

NONE<br />

9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />

NONE<br />

8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />

NONE<br />

9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />

NONE<br />

ARTIST: DONNA ROSS<br />

CONTRACT #: A7610B<br />

TITLE OF PROGRAM: CLAY CREATIONS<br />

TYPE OF PROGRAM: WORKSHOP<br />

DISTRICT/ SCHOOL:<br />

# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />

PELHAM/SIWANOY ELEM.<br />

# OF STUDENTS: 10 GRADE(S) 3-5<br />

DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 10/5-11/30/11<br />

NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />

STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 X STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />

ARTIST: DOREEN RAPPAPORT<br />

CONTRACT #: A8272<br />

TITLE OF PROGRAM: AUTHOR VISIT<br />

TYPE OF PROGRAM: ASSEMBLY<br />

DISTRICT/ SCHOOL:<br />

# OF TEACHERS: 5<br />

CHAPPAQUA/GRAFFLIN ELEM.<br />

# OF STUDENTS: 114 GRADE(S) 3 & 4<br />

DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 5/3/12<br />

NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />

STANDARD 1 STANDARD 2 STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />

1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />

1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />

1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />

2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />

3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />

4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />

5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />

6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

N/<br />

N/<br />

1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />

2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />

3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />

4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />

5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />

6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />

4<br />

4<br />

4<br />

4<br />

4<br />

N/<br />

7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM?<br />

NONE<br />

Y<br />

WHY?<br />

7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM?<br />

AUTHOR INSPIRED THE STUDENTS TO WRITE.<br />

Y<br />

WHY?<br />

8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />

NONE<br />

9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />

NONE<br />

8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />

USE DOCUMENT CAMERA TO SHARE BOOKS.<br />

9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />

NONE<br />

Arts in Education Service - School Evaluations <strong>2011</strong>-<strong>2012</strong><br />

Page 91 of 332


ARTIST: DORIS HERNACKI<br />

CONTRACT #: A8853<br />

TITLE OF PROGRAM: ACCOMPANIST FOR CHORAL SHOW<br />

TYPE OF PROGRAM: ASSEMBLY<br />

DISTRICT/ SCHOOL:<br />

# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />

WHITE PLAINS/EASTVIEW MS<br />

# OF STUDENTS: 40 GRADE(S) 7<br />

DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 5/16/12<br />

NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />

STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />

ARTIST: DOROTHY CANCELLIERI<br />

CONTRACT #: A8048B<br />

TITLE OF PROGRAM: ARTS & CRAFTS / CREATIVE CREATURE<br />

TYPE OF PROGRAM: WORKSHOP<br />

DISTRICT/ SCHOOL:<br />

# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />

PELHAM/PROSPECT HILL ELEM.<br />

# OF STUDENTS: 12 GRADE(S) K-2<br />

DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 1/10-3/6/12<br />

NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />

STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 X STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />

1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />

1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />

1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />

2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />

3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />

4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />

5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />

6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />

2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />

3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />

4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />

5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />

6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

N/<br />

7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM?<br />

EVERYTHING WAS WONDERFUL.<br />

Y<br />

WHY?<br />

7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM?<br />

NONE<br />

Y<br />

WHY?<br />

8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />

NONE<br />

9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />

NONE<br />

8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />

NONE<br />

9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />

NONE<br />

ARTIST: DOROTHY CANCELLIERI<br />

CONTRACT #: A8371B<br />

TITLE OF PROGRAM: ARTS & CRAFTS / DINO ART<br />

TYPE OF PROGRAM: WORKSHOP<br />

DISTRICT/ SCHOOL:<br />

# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />

PELHAM/HUTCHINSON ELEM.<br />

# OF STUDENTS: 11 GRADE(S) K-2<br />

DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 2/10-4/5/12<br />

NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />

STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 X STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />

ARTIST: DOROTHY CANCELLIERI<br />

CONTRACT #: A8048A<br />

TITLE OF PROGRAM: ARTS & CRAFTS / DINO ART<br />

TYPE OF PROGRAM: WORKSHOP<br />

DISTRICT/ SCHOOL:<br />

# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />

PELHAM/PROSPECT HILL ELEM.<br />

# OF STUDENTS: 9 GRADE(S) K-2<br />

DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 1/9-3/12/12<br />

NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />

STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 X STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />

1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />

1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />

1.<br />

2.<br />

3.<br />

4.<br />

5.<br />

6.<br />

STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />

ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />

EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />

ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />

TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />

QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />

STUDENTS LOVE TAKING THIS CLASS. DOROTHY IS A PLEASURE<br />

TO WORK WITH.<br />

8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />

NONE<br />

9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />

NONE<br />

1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />

2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />

3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />

4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />

5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />

6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />

7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />

NONE<br />

8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />

NONE<br />

9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />

NONE<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

N/<br />

Arts in Education Service - School Evaluations <strong>2011</strong>-<strong>2012</strong><br />

Page 92 of 332


ARTIST: DOROTHY CANCELLIERI<br />

CONTRACT #: A8371A<br />

TITLE OF PROGRAM: TRANSPORTATION ART & CRAFTS<br />

TYPE OF PROGRAM: WORKSHOP<br />

DISTRICT/ SCHOOL:<br />

# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />

PELHAM/HUTCHINSON ELEM.<br />

# OF STUDENTS: 10 GRADE(S) K-2<br />

DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 2/9-4/4/12<br />

NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />

STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 X STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />

ARTIST: DOUGLAS CORRELLUS<br />

CONTRACT #: A8114A<br />

TITLE OF PROGRAM: BIG BAND JAZZ LIVE CONCERT<br />

TYPE OF PROGRAM: ASSEMBLY<br />

DISTRICT/ SCHOOL:<br />

# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />

OSSINING/CLAREMONT ELEM.<br />

# OF STUDENTS: 705 GRADE(S) 3 & 4<br />

DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 12/22/11<br />

NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />

STANDARD 1 STANDARD 2 STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4 X<br />

1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />

1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />

1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />

2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />

3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />

4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />

5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />

6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />

7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />

DOROTHY IS A PLEASURE TO WORK WITH. SHE HAS A WELL<br />

THOUGHT OUT AND EXECUTED PROGRAM.<br />

8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />

NONE<br />

9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />

NONE<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

1.<br />

2.<br />

3.<br />

4.<br />

5.<br />

6.<br />

STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />

ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />

EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />

ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />

TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />

QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />

A GREAT PRESENTATION OF "BIG BAND" ERA MUSIC. STUDENTS<br />

WERE ENGAGED AND LEARNED TO APPRECIATE THE COLLECTIVE<br />

EFFORT AND INDIVIDUAL CONTRIBUTION OF SELECTED MUSICIANS<br />

AND THEIR INSTRUMENTS.<br />

8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />

NONE<br />

9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />

WOULD LOVE TO HAVE THEM RETURN NEXT YEAR.<br />

ARTIST: DOUGLAS CORRELLUS<br />

CONTRACT #: A8114B<br />

TITLE OF PROGRAM: BIG BAND JAZZ LIVE CONCERT<br />

TYPE OF PROGRAM: ASSEMBLY<br />

DISTRICT/ SCHOOL:<br />

# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />

OSSINING/BROOKSIDE ELEM.<br />

# OF STUDENTS: 750 GRADE(S) 1 & 2<br />

DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 12/22/11<br />

NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />

STANDARD 1 STANDARD 2 STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4 X<br />

ARTIST: DOUGLAS FLORIAN<br />

CONTRACT #: A8188<br />

TITLE OF PROGRAM: AUTHOR/ILLUSTRATOR VISIT<br />

TYPE OF PROGRAM: ASSEMBLY<br />

DISTRICT/ SCHOOL:<br />

# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />

TUCKAHOE/W. E. COTTLE ELEM.<br />

# OF STUDENTS: GRADE(S) K-5<br />

DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 3/13/12<br />

NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />

STANDARD 1 STANDARD 2 STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />

1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />

1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />

1.<br />

2.<br />

3.<br />

4.<br />

5.<br />

6.<br />

STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />

ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />

EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />

ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />

TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />

QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />

FABULOUS OPPORTUNITY FOR OUR STUDENTS TO SEE FIRST RATE<br />

JAZZ.<br />

8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />

NONE<br />

9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />

THANKS.<br />

1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />

2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />

3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />

4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />

5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />

6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />

7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />

EXCITING.<br />

8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />

NONE<br />

9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />

NONE<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

Arts in Education Service - School Evaluations <strong>2011</strong>-<strong>2012</strong><br />

Page 93 of 332


ARTIST: DOUGLAS FLORIAN<br />

CONTRACT #: A8573<br />

TITLE OF PROGRAM: AUTHOR/ILLUSTRATOR VISIT<br />

TYPE OF PROGRAM: ASSEMBLY<br />

DISTRICT/ SCHOOL:<br />

# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />

OSSINING/BROOKSIDE ELEM.<br />

# OF STUDENTS: 300 GRADE(S) 1 & 2<br />

DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 3/30/12<br />

NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />

STANDARD 1 STANDARD 2 STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />

ARTIST: DOUGLAS FLORIAN<br />

CONTRACT #: A8835<br />

TITLE OF PROGRAM: POETRY & ILLUSTRATION<br />

TYPE OF PROGRAM: ASSEMBLY<br />

DISTRICT/ SCHOOL:<br />

# OF TEACHERS: 3<br />

PELHAM/HUTCHINSON ELEM.<br />

# OF STUDENTS: 400 GRADE(S) K-5<br />

DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 5/9/12<br />

NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />

STANDARD 1 STANDARD 2 STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />

1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />

1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />

1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />

2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />

3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />

4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />

5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />

6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />

7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />

4<br />

4<br />

3<br />

4<br />

3<br />

N/<br />

THE PRESENTATION WAS INTERESTING AND ENGAGING. THE<br />

STUDENTS ENJOYED MEETING AN AUTHOR OF BOOKS THEY ENJOY<br />

READING.<br />

8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />

THE PACE OF THE ASSEMBLY WAS VERY FAST, MANY STUDENTS<br />

SEEMED TO GET LOST QUICKLY.<br />

9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />

POSSIBLY SMALLER GROUPS WOULD HAVE BEEN BETTER.<br />

ARTIST: DOUGLAS PULLEN<br />

CONTRACT #: A7671<br />

TITLE OF PROGRAM: BACH TO BEATLES MUSICAL SHOW<br />

TYPE OF PROGRAM: ASSEMBLY<br />

DISTRICT/ SCHOOL:<br />

BREWSTER/JFK ELEM.<br />

# OF TEACHERS: 6<br />

# OF STUDENTS: GRADE(S) K-3<br />

DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE<br />

1/5/12<br />

NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />

STANDARD 1 STANDARD 2 STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4 X<br />

1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />

1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />

2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />

3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />

4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />

5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />

6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />

7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />

DOUG WAS VERY EASY TO WORK WITH AND WAS WELL<br />

PREPARED. THE CHILDREN WERE ENGAGED. PARTICIPATION WAS<br />

GREAT.<br />

8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />

OUR SCHOOL HAS A LARGE SPECIAL ED. PROGRAM AND SOME<br />

TEACHERS THOUGHT HE SPOKE TOO FAST. I THOUGHT THIS WAS<br />

OK. IT KEPT THE CHILDREN ON THEIR TOES.<br />

9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />

ARTIST:<br />

IN THE FIFTH GRADER WORKSHOP THE STUDENTS PRODUCED A<br />

POEM AND ILLUSTRATION.<br />

EDUARDO NAVAS<br />

CONTRACT #: A8456<br />

TITLE OF PROGRAM: SCARAMOUCHES LATINO PUPPET THEATRE - HOW<br />

TO MAKE A PUPPET<br />

TYPE OF PROGRAM: WORKSHOP<br />

DISTRICT/ SCHOOL:<br />

NEW ROCHELLE/DAVIS ELEM. SCHOOL<br />

# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />

# OF STUDENTS: 125 GRADE(S) 1<br />

DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE<br />

4/26/12<br />

NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />

STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 X STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4 X<br />

1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />

2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />

3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />

4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />

5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />

6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />

7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />

A LITTLE DIFFICULT TO SIT THROUGH.<br />

8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />

CHANGE PROGRAM TO FIT AGE LEVEL.<br />

9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />

NONE<br />

3.5<br />

3.5<br />

3.5<br />

4<br />

4<br />

4<br />

1.<br />

2.<br />

3.<br />

4.<br />

5.<br />

6.<br />

STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />

ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />

EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />

ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />

TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />

QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />

THE ARTISTS WERE WONDERFUL. EDUARDO WAS EXTREMELY<br />

WELL PREPARED WITH ALL THE MATERIALS. HIS MANNER WAS<br />

CALM, HE WAS GRACIOUS WITH ALL THE CHILDREN. HE HELPED<br />

THEM PERFORM WITH THEIR PUPPETS.<br />

8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />

NONE<br />

9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />

TRULY EXCELLENT.<br />

Arts in Education Service - School Evaluations <strong>2011</strong>-<strong>2012</strong><br />

Page 94 of 332


ARTIST: EDUCATION IN DANCE & THE RELATED<br />

CONTRACT #: A8412<br />

TITLE OF PROGRAM: JO FREDERIKSEN - INTEGRATED DANCE, MUSIC &<br />

THE ARTS<br />

TYPE OF PROGRAM: ASSEMBLY/RESIDENCY<br />

DISTRICT/ SCHOOL: WHITE PLAINS/MAMARONECK AVENUE ELEM. ELEM.<br />

# OF TEACHERS: 5<br />

# OF STUDENTS: 100 GRADE(S) 1<br />

DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 6/13/12<br />

NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />

STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 X STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4 X<br />

1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />

ARTIST: EDUCATIONAL PRODUCTION<br />

CONTRACT #: A8031<br />

TITLE OF PROGRAM: JAMES VAGIAS - THE WINTER HOLIDAY EXPRESS<br />

TYPE OF PROGRAM: ASSEMBLY<br />

DISTRICT/ SCHOOL:<br />

# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />

YORKTOWN/BROOKSIDE ELEM.<br />

# OF STUDENTS: 300 GRADE(S) K-3<br />

DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 12/19/11<br />

NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />

STANDARD 1 STANDARD 2 STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4 X<br />

1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />

1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />

2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />

3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />

4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />

5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />

6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />

7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />

THIS IS A WONDERFUL PROGRAM.<br />

8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />

NONE<br />

9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />

THE CHILDREN LEARNED A LOT AND HAD A VERY GOOD TIME.<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

1.<br />

2.<br />

3.<br />

4.<br />

5.<br />

6.<br />

STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />

ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />

EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />

ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />

TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />

QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />

4<br />

4<br />

4<br />

3<br />

4<br />

N/<br />

7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />

ARTIST WAS KNOWLEDGABLE AND ENGAGED THE CHILDREN.<br />

EMPHASIS WAS MORE ON READING, FULFILLING DREAMS, GIVING<br />

AND SHARING NOT SIMPLY ON WINTER HOLIDAYS.<br />

8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />

IF POSSIBLE ALLOW TIME FOR CHILDREN TO ASK QUESITONS.<br />

9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />

LOVED THE SHOW. WOULD HIGHLY RECOMMEND THIS ARTIST.<br />

ARTIST: EDUCATIONAL PRODUCTION<br />

CONTRACT #: A7762<br />

TITLE OF PROGRAM: JAMES VAGIAS - THE WINTER HOLIDAY EXPRESS<br />

TYPE OF PROGRAM: ASSEMBLY<br />

DISTRICT/ SCHOOL:<br />

# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />

CROTON/CET ELEM.<br />

# OF STUDENTS: 620 GRADE(S) K-4<br />

DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 11/15/11<br />

NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />

STANDARD 1 STANDARD 2 STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4 X<br />

ARTIST: EDWARD "TED" SCHEU<br />

CONTRACT #: A8135<br />

TITLE OF PROGRAM: POETRY AUTHOR<br />

TYPE OF PROGRAM: ASSEMBLY<br />

DISTRICT/ SCHOOL: CHAPPAQUA/WESTORCHARD ELEM.<br />

# OF TEACHERS: 5<br />

# OF STUDENTS: 102 GRADE(S) 1<br />

DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 4/12/12<br />

NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />

STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 X STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />

1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />

1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />

1.<br />

2.<br />

3.<br />

4.<br />

5.<br />

6.<br />

STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />

ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />

EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />

ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />

TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />

QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />

HE IS AN EXCELLENT PERFORMER. HE KNOWS HOW TO PRESENT<br />

TO CHILDREN TO KEEP THEIR INTERESTS AND TO EDUCATE THEM.<br />

8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />

NONE<br />

9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />

HE IS FUN AND UPBEAT AND VERY ENGAGING. BOTH STUDENTS<br />

AND FACULTY WERE WOWED BY HIM.<br />

1.<br />

2.<br />

3.<br />

4.<br />

5.<br />

6.<br />

STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />

ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />

EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />

ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />

TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />

QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

4<br />

N/<br />

7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />

MR. SCHEU WAS FABULOUS. WE ALL AGREED THAT THE<br />

CHILDREN WERE SO ENGAGED AND THE INTERACTIVE PIECE WAS<br />

8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />

NONE<br />

9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />

WE WOULD LOVE TO HAVE HIM AGAIN. IT WAS WONDERFUL.<br />

Arts in Education Service - School Evaluations <strong>2011</strong>-<strong>2012</strong><br />

Page 95 of 332


ARTIST: EDWARD "TED" SCHEU<br />

CONTRACT #: A8758<br />

TITLE OF PROGRAM: POETRY GUY<br />

TYPE OF PROGRAM: ASSEMBLY/WORKSHOP<br />

DISTRICT/ SCHOOL: KATONAH/LEWISBORO/INCREASE MILLER ELEM.<br />

# OF TEACHERS: 3<br />

# OF STUDENTS: 22 GRADE(S) 2<br />

DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 3/29/12<br />

NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />

STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 X STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />

ARTIST: EDWARD "TED" SCHEU<br />

CONTRACT #: A8825<br />

TITLE OF PROGRAM: POETRY GUY<br />

TYPE OF PROGRAM: RESIDENCY<br />

DISTRICT/ SCHOOL: EASTCHESTER/ANNE HUTCHINSON ELEM.<br />

# OF TEACHERS: 4<br />

# OF STUDENTS: 100 GRADE(S) 4<br />

DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 6/5-6/12<br />

NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />

STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 X STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />

1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />

1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />

1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />

2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />

3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />

4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />

5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />

6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />

7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />

TED IS A WONDERFUL PRESENTER. VERY STUDENT FRIENDLY.<br />

8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />

NONE<br />

9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />

ADDITION OF WORD BANK WAS APPRECIATED. TIMING WAS<br />

EFFICIENT AND WELL PLANNED. THANKS FOR THE "GIFT" BOOKS<br />

BEFORE THE SHOW AND THANKS FOR BRINGING YOUR OWN<br />

SOUND SYSTEM.<br />

4<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

4<br />

1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />

2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />

3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />

4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />

5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />

6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />

7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />

TED IS A 5 STAR POET TEACHER. HE RELATES EXCEPTIONALLY<br />

WELL TO STUDENTS AND REALLY MOTIVATES THEM.<br />

8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />

HE IS JUST ABOUT PERFECT IN MY EYES.<br />

9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />

NONE<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

ARTIST: EDWARD "TED" SCHEU<br />

CONTRACT #: A8244<br />

TITLE OF PROGRAM: POETRY GUY<br />

TYPE OF PROGRAM: ASSEMBLY/WORKSHOP<br />

DISTRICT/ SCHOOL: KATONAH/LEWISBORO/LEWISBORO ELEM.<br />

# OF TEACHERS: 4<br />

# OF STUDENTS: 72 GRADE(S) 2<br />

DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 4/13/12<br />

NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />

STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 X STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />

ARTIST: EDWARD "TED" SCHEU<br />

CONTRACT #: A8519<br />

TITLE OF PROGRAM: POETRY GUY<br />

TYPE OF PROGRAM: ASSEMBLY/WORKSHOP<br />

DISTRICT/ SCHOOL: PLEASANTVILLE/BEDFORD ROAD ELEM.<br />

# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />

# OF STUDENTS: 117 GRADE(S) 2<br />

DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 3/22/12<br />

NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />

STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 X STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />

1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />

1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />

1.<br />

2.<br />

3.<br />

4.<br />

5.<br />

6.<br />

STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />

ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />

EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />

ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />

TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />

QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />

TED IS GENUINELY INTERESTED IN HELPING THE CHILDREN LOVE<br />

POETRY. THEY ALL ENJOYED THE DAY.<br />

8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />

NONE<br />

9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />

THANK YOU.<br />

1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />

2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />

3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />

4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />

5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />

6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />

7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />

I USE THIS PROGRAM AS A KICK OFF FOR MY POETRY UNIT.<br />

8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />

TED SHOULD ILLUSTRATE HIS BOOKS, HE IS VERY TALENTED.<br />

9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />

I'M LOOKING FORWARD TO NEXT YEAR ALREADY.<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

Arts in Education Service - School Evaluations <strong>2011</strong>-<strong>2012</strong><br />

Page 96 of 332


ARTIST: EDWARD "TED" SCHEU<br />

CONTRACT #: A8558<br />

TITLE OF PROGRAM: POETRY GUY<br />

TYPE OF PROGRAM: ASSEMBLY<br />

DISTRICT/ SCHOOL:<br />

# OF TEACHERS: 4<br />

LAKELAND/LINCOLN-TITUS ELEM.<br />

# OF STUDENTS: 90 GRADE(S) 3<br />

DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 5/9/12<br />

NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />

STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />

ARTIST: EDWARD "TED" SCHEU<br />

CONTRACT #: A8340<br />

TITLE OF PROGRAM: POETRY GUY<br />

TYPE OF PROGRAM: RESIDENCY<br />

DISTRICT/ SCHOOL:<br />

# OF TEACHERS: 4<br />

CHAPPAQUA/GRAFFLIN ELEM.<br />

# OF STUDENTS: 78 GRADE(S) K & 1<br />

DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 4/19 & 20/12<br />

NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />

STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 X STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />

1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />

1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />

1.<br />

2.<br />

3.<br />

4.<br />

5.<br />

6.<br />

STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />

ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />

EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />

ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />

TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />

QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />

WE ALWAYS TELL OTHER EDUCATORS WHAT A WONDERFUL JOB<br />

HE DOES WITH THE CHILDREN. HE IS CREATIVE, WITTY AND KEEPS<br />

THE STUDENTS INVOLVED.<br />

8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />

NONE<br />

9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />

NONE<br />

ARTIST: EDWARD "TED" SCHEU<br />

TITLE OF PROGRAM: POETRY GUY<br />

TYPE OF PROGRAM: RESIDENCY<br />

DISTRICT/ SCHOOL:<br />

CONTRACT #: A8326<br />

EASTCHESTER/ANNE HUTCHINSON ELEM.<br />

# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />

# OF STUDENTS: 24 GRADE(S) 2<br />

DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE<br />

2/6-9/12<br />

NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />

STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 X STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />

1.<br />

2.<br />

3.<br />

4.<br />

5.<br />

6.<br />

STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />

ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />

EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />

ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />

TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />

QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />

TED'S PRESENTATION AND WORKSHOPS WERE THE PERFECT<br />

COMPANION TO OUR POETRY UNIT. HE IS FUN, ENGAGING,<br />

TALENTED AND WITTY. THE CHILDREN AND TEACHERS LOVED HIM.<br />

8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />

NONE<br />

9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />

NONE<br />

ARTIST: EDWARD "TED" SCHEU<br />

CONTRACT #: A7512<br />

TITLE OF PROGRAM: POETRY GUY<br />

TYPE OF PROGRAM: RESIDENCY<br />

DISTRICT/ SCHOOL: KATONAH/LEWISBORO/KATONAH ELEM. SCHOOL<br />

# OF TEACHERS: 8<br />

# OF STUDENTS: 150 GRADE(S) 2 & 3<br />

DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 1/11-13/12<br />

NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />

STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 X STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4 X<br />

1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />

1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />

1.<br />

2.<br />

3.<br />

4.<br />

5.<br />

6.<br />

STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />

ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />

EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />

ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />

TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />

QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />

5<br />

4<br />

5<br />

5<br />

4<br />

4<br />

7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />

VERY ENERGETIC AND THE STUDENTS LOVED HIM. GREAT POEMS<br />

ARE CREATED BY THE STUDENTS.<br />

8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />

MORE ON THE PROCESS GOING BACK TO EDIT-ADD-DELETE, ETC.<br />

9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />

THANKS FOR THE BOOK.<br />

1.<br />

2.<br />

3.<br />

4.<br />

5.<br />

6.<br />

STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />

ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />

EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />

ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />

TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />

QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />

TED IS MAGICAL. HE TURNS STUDENTS INTO CREATIVE WRITERS<br />

AND LOVERS OF POETRY IN A MATTER OF MINUTES.<br />

8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />

NONE.<br />

9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />

IT IS ALWAYS AN ABSOLUTE PLEASURE TO HOST TED. HE'S A<br />

CELEBRITY - - BETTER THAN A ROCK STAR. KEEP THE MAGIC,<br />

CHARM, AND HUMOR. WE CAN'T WAIT TO SEE YOUR NEW WEBSITE.<br />

Arts in Education Service - School Evaluations <strong>2011</strong>-<strong>2012</strong><br />

Page 97 of 332


ARTIST: EDWARD "TED" SCHEU<br />

CONTRACT #: A7570A<br />

TITLE OF PROGRAM: POETRY GUY<br />

TYPE OF PROGRAM: WORKSHOP<br />

DISTRICT/ SCHOOL: EASTCHESTER/GREENVALE ELEM.<br />

# OF TEACHERS: 7<br />

# OF STUDENTS: 146 GRADE(S) 2<br />

DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 3/6 & 7/12<br />

NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />

STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 X STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />

ARTIST: EDWARD DURKEE<br />

CONTRACT #: A8268<br />

TITLE OF PROGRAM: SCULPTING<br />

TYPE OF PROGRAM: WORKSHOP<br />

DISTRICT/ SCHOOL:<br />

# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />

NORTH SALEM/PQ ELEM.<br />

# OF STUDENTS: 9 GRADE(S) K-2<br />

DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 1/26-3/29/12<br />

NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />

STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 X STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />

1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />

1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />

1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />

2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />

3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />

4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />

5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />

6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />

7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />

MR. SCHEU IS EXCEPTIONAL WITH THE STUDENTS. HE TEACHES<br />

THE STUDENTS TO WRITE IN A VERY DESCRIPTIVE FASHION.<br />

8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />

NONE<br />

9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />

NONE<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />

2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />

3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />

4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />

5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />

6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />

7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />

NONE<br />

8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />

NONE<br />

9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />

NONE<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

ARTIST: EDWARD DURKEE<br />

CONTRACT #: A8815<br />

TITLE OF PROGRAM: SCULPTING ART ADVENTURES<br />

TYPE OF PROGRAM: WORKSHOP<br />

DISTRICT/ SCHOOL:<br />

# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />

NORTH SALEM/PQ ELEM.<br />

# OF STUDENTS: 9 GRADE(S) K-5<br />

DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 4/20-6/8/12<br />

NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />

STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 X STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />

1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />

ARTIST: EDWARD XIQUES<br />

CONTRACT #: A8649<br />

TITLE OF PROGRAM: SAXIPHONE PLAYER FOR THE SHOW - A FUNNY<br />

THING HAPPENED ON THE WAY TO THE FORUM<br />

TYPE OF PROGRAM: ASSEMBLY<br />

DISTRICT/ SCHOOL: PUTNAM VALLEY/PUTNAM VALLEY HIGH SCHOOL<br />

# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />

# OF STUDENTS: 400 GRADE(S) 9-12<br />

DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 4/13-23/12<br />

NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />

STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />

1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />

1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />

2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />

3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />

4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />

5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />

6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />

7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />

NONE<br />

8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />

NONE<br />

9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />

NONE<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />

2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />

3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />

4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />

5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />

6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />

7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />

NONE<br />

8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />

NONE<br />

9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />

NONE<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

Arts in Education Service - School Evaluations <strong>2011</strong>-<strong>2012</strong><br />

Page 98 of 332


ARTIST: ELIZABETH BRESLIN<br />

CONTRACT #: A8290<br />

TITLE OF PROGRAM: CREATIVE DRAMA<br />

TYPE OF PROGRAM: WORKSHOP<br />

DISTRICT/ SCHOOL: KATONAH/LEWISBORO/KATONAH ELEM. SCHOOL<br />

# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />

# OF STUDENTS: 10 GRADE(S) K-2<br />

DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 1/20-3/16/12<br />

NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />

STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 X STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />

ARTIST: ELIZABETH BRESLIN<br />

CONTRACT #: A7558<br />

TITLE OF PROGRAM: CREATIVE DRAMA<br />

TYPE OF PROGRAM: WORKSHOP<br />

DISTRICT/ SCHOOL: KATONAH/LEWISBORO/KATONAH ELEM. SCHOOL<br />

# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />

# OF STUDENTS: 9 GRADE(S) K-2<br />

DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 9/27-11/15/11<br />

NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />

STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 X STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />

1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />

1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />

1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />

2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />

3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />

4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />

5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />

6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />

7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />

NONE<br />

8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />

NONE<br />

9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />

NONE<br />

4<br />

4<br />

4<br />

4<br />

4<br />

4<br />

1.<br />

2.<br />

3.<br />

4.<br />

5.<br />

6.<br />

STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />

ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />

EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />

ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />

TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />

QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />

5<br />

5<br />

4<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />

CHILDREN REALLY ENJOYED THIS EDUCATIONAL AND FUN CLASS.<br />

8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />

NONE<br />

9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />

NONE<br />

ARTIST: ELIZABETH FEAR<br />

CONTRACT #: A8361<br />

TITLE OF PROGRAM: ART & CULTURE OF YOGA<br />

TYPE OF PROGRAM: WORKSHOP<br />

DISTRICT/ SCHOOL:<br />

# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />

PELHAM/SIWANOY ELEM.<br />

# OF STUDENTS: 9 GRADE(S) K-2<br />

DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 2/2-3/29/12<br />

NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />

STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 X STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4 X<br />

ARTIST: ELIZABETH FEAR<br />

CONTRACT #: A7612<br />

TITLE OF PROGRAM: ART & CULTURE OF YOGA<br />

TYPE OF PROGRAM: WORKSHOP<br />

DISTRICT/ SCHOOL:<br />

# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />

PELHAM/SIWANOY ELEM.<br />

# OF STUDENTS: 8 GRADE(S) K-2<br />

DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 10/6-12/1/11<br />

NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />

STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 X STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4 X<br />

1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />

1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />

1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />

2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />

3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />

4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />

5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />

6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

N/<br />

1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />

2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />

3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />

4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />

5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />

6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM?<br />

NONE<br />

Y<br />

WHY?<br />

7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM?<br />

NONE<br />

Y<br />

WHY?<br />

8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />

NONE<br />

9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />

NONE<br />

8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />

NONE<br />

9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />

NONE<br />

Arts in Education Service - School Evaluations <strong>2011</strong>-<strong>2012</strong><br />

Page 99 of 332


ARTIST: ELIZABETH LEVY<br />

CONTRACT #: A7744<br />

TITLE OF PROGRAM: AUTHOR VISIT<br />

TYPE OF PROGRAM: ASSEMBLY<br />

DISTRICT/ SCHOOL: KATONAH/LEWISBORO/KATONAH ELEM. SCHOOL<br />

# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />

# OF STUDENTS: 93 GRADE(S) 5<br />

DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 10/25/11<br />

NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />

STANDARD 1 STANDARD 2 STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />

ARTIST: ELIZABETH McNAMARA<br />

CONTRACT #: A8021<br />

TITLE OF PROGRAM: IRISH STEP DANCING<br />

TYPE OF PROGRAM: WORKSHOP<br />

DISTRICT/ SCHOOL: TUCKAHOE/TUCKAHOE HIGH SCHOOL<br />

# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />

# OF STUDENTS: 60 GRADE(S) 9-12<br />

DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 11/28/11-3/3/12<br />

NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />

STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 X STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4 X<br />

1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />

1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />

1.<br />

2.<br />

3.<br />

4.<br />

5.<br />

6.<br />

STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />

ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />

EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />

ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />

TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />

QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />

LIZ WAS GREAT. SHE USED A LOT OF AUDIENCE PARTICIPATION,<br />

SHE EXPLAINED HOW WRITERS GET IDEAS FROM THEIR DAILY<br />

LIVES. SHE HAD WONDERFUL STORIES TO TELL ABOUT PREVIOUS<br />

WRITERS. SHE FOCUSED ON THEIR IMPORTANCE OF DETAIL IN<br />

WRITING. SHE MADE HER DISCUSSION TO THE CLASS VERY<br />

RELEVANT.<br />

8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />

NONE<br />

9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />

WE WOULD DEFINITELY HAVE HER BACK.<br />

ARTIST: ELIZABETH ROCKWELL ALCORN CONTRACT #: A8590<br />

TITLE OF PROGRAM: AUTHOR VISIT<br />

TYPE OF PROGRAM: WORKSHOP<br />

DISTRICT/ SCHOOL:<br />

# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />

TARRYTOWN/W. L. MORSE ELEM.<br />

# OF STUDENTS: 200 GRADE(S) 2<br />

DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 4/25-26/12<br />

NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />

STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />

1.<br />

2.<br />

3.<br />

4.<br />

5.<br />

6.<br />

STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />

ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />

EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />

ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />

TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />

QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />

DANCE IS FUN, CULTURAL, EDUCATIONAL AND PHYSICALLY ACTIVE.<br />

8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />

NONE<br />

9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />

VERY ORGANIZED AND TALENTED.<br />

ARTIST: ELLEN A. FLAKS<br />

TITLE OF PROGRAM: KIDS ON THE BLOCK<br />

TYPE OF PROGRAM: ASSEMBLY<br />

DISTRICT/ SCHOOL:<br />

NEW ROCHELLE/DAVIS ELEM. SCHOOL<br />

CONTRACT #: A8448A<br />

# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />

# OF STUDENTS: 125 GRADE(S) 3<br />

DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 2/27/12<br />

NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />

STANDARD 1 STANDARD 2 STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />

1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />

1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />

1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />

2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />

3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />

4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />

5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />

6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />

7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />

HER PRESENTATIONS WERE EXCELLENT. THE STUDENTS WERE<br />

ENGAGED THE ENTIRE VISIT.<br />

8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />

NONE<br />

9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />

ALL CLASSROOM TEACHERS RAVED ABOUT HER EXPERTISE AND<br />

REQUESTED THAT SHE RETURN NEXT YEAR.<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

1.<br />

2.<br />

3.<br />

4.<br />

5.<br />

6.<br />

STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />

ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />

EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />

ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />

TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />

QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />

IT IS AN EXCELLENT TOOL FOR TEACHING TOLERANCE, KINDNESS<br />

AND RESPECT.<br />

8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />

NONE<br />

9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />

NONE<br />

Arts in Education Service - School Evaluations <strong>2011</strong>-<strong>2012</strong><br />

Page 100 of 332


ARTIST: ELLEN A. FLAKS<br />

CONTRACT #: A8121A<br />

TITLE OF PROGRAM: KIDS ON THE BLOCK<br />

TYPE OF PROGRAM: ASSEMBLY<br />

DISTRICT/ SCHOOL: KATONAH/LEWISBORO/KATONAH ELEM. SCHOOL<br />

# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />

# OF STUDENTS: GRADE(S) 3<br />

DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 3/8/12<br />

NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />

STANDARD 1 STANDARD 2 STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />

ARTIST: ELLEN FLAKS<br />

CONTRACT #: A7810<br />

TITLE OF PROGRAM: KIDS ON THE BLOCK<br />

TYPE OF PROGRAM: ASSEMBLY<br />

DISTRICT/ SCHOOL:<br />

# OF TEACHERS: 5<br />

CHAPPAQUA/GRAFFLIN ELEM.<br />

# OF STUDENTS: 105 GRADE(S) 3<br />

DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 5/4/12<br />

NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />

STANDARD 1 STANDARD 2 STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />

1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />

1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />

1.<br />

2.<br />

3.<br />

4.<br />

5.<br />

6.<br />

STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />

ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />

EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />

ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />

TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />

QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />

THIS PROGRAM WAS AN EXCELLENT WAY TO INTEGRATE A<br />

DISCUSSION ON LEARNING DIFFERENCES AND ACCEPTANCE WITH<br />

OUR CLASSES.<br />

8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />

NONE<br />

9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />

GREAT PRESENTATION. I LIKED THE ADDITION OF<br />

COMPREHENSION QUESTIONS FOLLOWING THE SHOW. THE<br />

STUDENTS REALLY SEEMED TO ENJOY BEING ABLE TO PROCESS.<br />

1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />

2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />

3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />

4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />

5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />

6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />

7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />

STUDENTS LEARNED A LOT FROM THIS PRESENTATION.<br />

8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />

NONE<br />

9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />

NONE<br />

5<br />

4<br />

5<br />

5<br />

4<br />

5<br />

ARTIST: ELLEN FLAKS<br />

CONTRACT #: A7670A<br />

TITLE OF PROGRAM: KIDS ON THE BLOCK<br />

TYPE OF PROGRAM: ASSEMBLY<br />

DISTRICT/ SCHOOL:<br />

# OF TEACHERS: 5<br />

BREWSTER/JFK ELEM.<br />

# OF STUDENTS: GRADE(S) 3<br />

DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 11/18/11<br />

NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />

STANDARD 1 STANDARD 2 STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />

ARTIST: ELLEN SAMPLE<br />

CONTRACT #: A7616B<br />

TITLE OF PROGRAM: ARTS & CRAFTS<br />

TYPE OF PROGRAM: WORKSHOP<br />

DISTRICT/ SCHOOL:<br />

# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />

PELHAM/HUTCHINSON ELEM.<br />

# OF STUDENTS: 7 GRADE(S) K-2<br />

DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 10/14-12/9/11<br />

NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />

STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 X STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />

1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />

1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />

1.<br />

2.<br />

3.<br />

4.<br />

5.<br />

6.<br />

STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />

ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />

EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />

ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />

TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />

QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />

GREAT SHOW IN A CHILD FRIENDLY MANNER WITH A WONDERFUL<br />

MESSAGE.<br />

8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />

NONE<br />

9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />

NONE<br />

1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />

2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />

3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />

4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />

5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />

6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />

7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />

ELLEN IS A PLEASURE TO WORK WITH. SHE IS ORGANIZED,<br />

PREPARED AND ALWAYS PUNCTUAL.<br />

8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />

NONE<br />

9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />

NONE<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

Arts in Education Service - School Evaluations <strong>2011</strong>-<strong>2012</strong><br />

Page 101 of 332


ARTIST: ELLEN SAMPLE<br />

CONTRACT #: A8375A<br />

TITLE OF PROGRAM: ARTS & CRAFTS<br />

TYPE OF PROGRAM: WORKSHOP<br />

DISTRICT/ SCHOOL:<br />

# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />

PELHAM/HUTCHINSON ELEM.<br />

# OF STUDENTS: 11 GRADE(S) K-2<br />

DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 2/9-4/5/12<br />

NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />

STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 X STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />

ARTIST: ELLEN SAMPLE<br />

CONTRACT #: A8375B<br />

TITLE OF PROGRAM: SEWING WITH FLEECE<br />

TYPE OF PROGRAM: WORKSHOP<br />

DISTRICT/ SCHOOL:<br />

# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />

PELHAM/HUTCHINSON ELEM.<br />

# OF STUDENTS: 10 GRADE(S) 3-5<br />

DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 2/14-4/3/12<br />

NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />

STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 X STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />

1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />

1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />

1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />

2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />

3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />

4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />

5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />

6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />

7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />

THIS CLASS CONTINUES TO BE ONE OF THE MOST POPULAR<br />

CHOICES FOR THE STUDENTS.<br />

8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />

NONE<br />

9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />

NONE<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

1.<br />

2.<br />

3.<br />

4.<br />

5.<br />

6.<br />

STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />

ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />

EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />

ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />

TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />

QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />

ELLEN IS WELL ORGANIZED. SHE IS A PLEASURE TO WORK WITH.<br />

8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />

NONE<br />

9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />

NONE<br />

ARTIST: ELLEN SAMPLE<br />

CONTRACT #: A7616A<br />

TITLE OF PROGRAM: SEWING WITH FLEECE<br />

TYPE OF PROGRAM: WORKSHOP<br />

DISTRICT/ SCHOOL:<br />

# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />

PELHAM/HUTCHINSON ELEM.<br />

# OF STUDENTS: 7 GRADE(S) 3-5<br />

DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 10/11-11/22/11<br />

NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />

STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 X STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />

ARTIST: ELLEN TESITORE<br />

CONTRACT #: A8274<br />

TITLE OF PROGRAM: ARCHITECTURE OF NEW YORK CITY<br />

TYPE OF PROGRAM: RESIDENCY<br />

DISTRICT/ SCHOOL: DOBBS FERRY/SPRINGHURST ELEM.<br />

# OF TEACHERS: 6<br />

# OF STUDENTS: 125 GRADE(S) 2<br />

DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 2/27-3/23/12<br />

NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />

STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 X STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4 X<br />

1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />

1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />

1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />

2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />

3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />

4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />

5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />

6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />

7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />

ELLEN IS A PLEASURE TO WORK WITH. SHE IS ORGANIZED,<br />

PREPARED AND ALWAYS PUNCTUAL.<br />

8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />

NONE<br />

9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />

NONE<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

1.<br />

2.<br />

3.<br />

4.<br />

5.<br />

6.<br />

STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />

ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />

EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />

ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />

TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />

QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

N/<br />

N/<br />

7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />

ELLEN IS A WONDERFUL ARTIST AND EDUCATOR. SHE TALKED TO<br />

THE CHILDREN ABOUT THE DESIGN OF MANY FAMOUS NYC<br />

BUILDINGS. THEN WITH HER GUIDANCE, THEY CREATED MODELS<br />

USING RECYCLABLE MATERIALS. THE CHILDREN WERE ENGAGED<br />

AND ENTHUSIASTIC.<br />

8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />

NONE<br />

9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />

THE CHILDREN ABSOLUTELY LOVE THEIR CREATIONS.<br />

Arts in Education Service - School Evaluations <strong>2011</strong>-<strong>2012</strong><br />

Page 102 of 332


ARTIST: ELLIOT SEMEL<br />

CONTRACT #: A7989<br />

TITLE OF PROGRAM: TROMBONE PLAYER FOR THE SHOW - THE DROWSY<br />

CHAPERONE<br />

TYPE OF PROGRAM: ASSEMBLY<br />

DISTRICT/ SCHOOL: CHAPPAQUA/HORACE GREELEY HIGH SCHOOL<br />

# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />

# OF STUDENTS: 15 GRADE(S) 9-12<br />

DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 11/17-19/11<br />

NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />

STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />

1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />

ARTIST: ENCORE PERFORMING ARTS, INC. CONTRACT #: A7783<br />

TITLE OF PROGRAM: AMERICAN DANCE FROM AFRICA TO BROADWAY<br />

TYPE OF PROGRAM: ASSEMBLY<br />

DISTRICT/ SCHOOL:<br />

# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />

SOMERS/PRIMROSE ELEM.<br />

# OF STUDENTS: 700 GRADE(S) K-2<br />

DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 3/19/12<br />

NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />

STANDARD 1 STANDARD 2 STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4 X<br />

1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />

1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />

2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />

3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />

4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />

5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />

6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />

7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />

ELLIOT IS A GIFTED MUSICIAN AND GREAT SUPPORT FOR OUR<br />

STUDENTS.<br />

8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />

NONE<br />

9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />

I LOOK FORWARD TO WORKING WITH HIM AGAIN.<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />

2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />

3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />

4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />

5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />

6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />

7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />

FOR AN OLDER AUDIENCE.<br />

8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />

TAILOR IT MORE TOWARDS K-2 FOR THE BACKGROUND OF SLAVES<br />

COMING TO AMERICA.<br />

9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />

NONE<br />

4<br />

4<br />

5<br />

5<br />

4<br />

5<br />

ARTIST:<br />

ENCORE PERFORMING ARTS, INC.<br />

TITLE OF PROGRAM: ANNIE HICKMAN - WEAVING THE WILD<br />

TYPE OF PROGRAM: ASSEMBLY<br />

DISTRICT/ SCHOOL:<br />

SOMERS/PRIMROSE ELEM.<br />

CONTRACT #: A8806<br />

# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />

# OF STUDENTS: 220 GRADE(S) 1<br />

DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE<br />

5/23/12<br />

NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />

STANDARD 1 STANDARD 2 STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />

1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />

1.<br />

2.<br />

3.<br />

4.<br />

5.<br />

6.<br />

STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />

ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />

EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />

ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />

TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />

QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />

5<br />

5<br />

4<br />

5<br />

5<br />

N/<br />

7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />

COSTUMES AND DANCE WERE FANTASTIC. STUDENTS LOVED THE<br />

SHOW.<br />

8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />

NONE<br />

9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />

NONE<br />

ARTIST: ENCORE PERFORMING ARTS, INC. CONTRACT #: A7943<br />

TITLE OF PROGRAM: CRABGRASS PUPPET THEATRE - HAIKU, HIP HOP &<br />

HOT DOGS<br />

TYPE OF PROGRAM: ASSEMBLY<br />

DISTRICT/ SCHOOL: HENDRICK HUDSON/BUCHANAN/VERPLANCK ELEM.<br />

# OF TEACHERS: 7<br />

# OF STUDENTS: 307 GRADE(S) K-5<br />

DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 1/18/12<br />

NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />

STANDARD 1 STANDARD 2 STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />

1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />

1.<br />

2.<br />

3.<br />

4.<br />

5.<br />

6.<br />

STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />

ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />

EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />

ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />

TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />

QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />

CRABGRASS IS AN EXCELLENT PERFORMANCE GROUP. THEY ARE<br />

WHOLLY PROFESSIONAL, UNDERSTAND THE ELEMENTARY<br />

AUDIENCE AND KEEP THE STUDENTS INVOLVED FROM START TO<br />

FINISH. STUDENTS WERE EDUCATED AND ENTERTAINED.<br />

8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />

NONE<br />

9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />

PERFORMERS ARE WONDERFUL AT AIMING THEIR PROGRAM TO<br />

THE CORRECT AUDIENCE. KUDOS.<br />

Arts in Education Service - School Evaluations <strong>2011</strong>-<strong>2012</strong><br />

Page 103 of 332


ARTIST: ENCORE PERFORMING ARTS, INC. CONTRACT #: A7853<br />

TITLE OF PROGRAM: LISA LOU - MAGIC OF CHEMISTRY SHOW<br />

TYPE OF PROGRAM: ASSEMBLY<br />

DISTRICT/ SCHOOL: PUTNAM VALLEY/PUTNAM VALLEY ELEM.<br />

# OF TEACHERS: 5<br />

# OF STUDENTS: 140 GRADE(S) 5<br />

DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 11/2/11<br />

NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />

STANDARD 1 STANDARD 2 STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />

ARTIST: ENCORE PERFORMING ARTS, INC. CONTRACT #: A7874B<br />

TITLE OF PROGRAM: LISA LOU - MAGIC OF CHEMISTRY SHOW<br />

TYPE OF PROGRAM: ASSEMBLY<br />

DISTRICT/ SCHOOL:<br />

# OF TEACHERS: 4<br />

BYRAM HILLS/WAMPUS ELEM.<br />

# OF STUDENTS: 200 GRADE(S) 4<br />

DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 5/16/12<br />

NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />

STANDARD 1 STANDARD 2 STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />

1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />

1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />

1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />

2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />

3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />

4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />

5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />

6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />

4<br />

3<br />

3<br />

4/5<br />

4/5<br />

N/<br />

1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />

2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />

3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />

4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />

5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />

6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM?<br />

NONE<br />

8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />

NONE<br />

9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />

NONE<br />

Y<br />

WHY?<br />

7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />

THE STUDENTS ARE ENGAGED THROUGHOUT THE ENTIRE<br />

PERFORMANCE.<br />

8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />

NONE<br />

9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />

NONE<br />

ARTIST: ENCORE PERFORMING ARTS, INC. CONTRACT #: A7874A<br />

TITLE OF PROGRAM: MR. FISH PHENOMENAL PHYSICS SHOW<br />

TYPE OF PROGRAM: ASSEMBLY<br />

DISTRICT/ SCHOOL:<br />

# OF TEACHERS: 4<br />

BYRAM HILLS/WAMPUS ELEM.<br />

# OF STUDENTS: 200 GRADE(S) 5<br />

DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 5/16/12<br />

NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />

STANDARD 1 STANDARD 2 STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />

ARTIST: ENCORE PERFORMING ARTS, INC. CONTRACT #: A7651<br />

TITLE OF PROGRAM: TAINO-LATIN AMERICAN JOURNEY<br />

TYPE OF PROGRAM: ASSEMBLY<br />

DISTRICT/ SCHOOL:<br />

# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />

OSSINING/PARK SCHOOL<br />

# OF STUDENTS: 400 GRADE(S) PRE K &<br />

DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 12/8/11<br />

NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />

STANDARD 1 STANDARD 2 STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4 X<br />

1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />

1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />

1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />

2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />

3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />

4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />

5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />

6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />

2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />

3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />

4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />

5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />

6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

N/<br />

7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />

THE STUDENTS ARE ENGAGED THROUGHOUT THE ENTIRE<br />

PERFORMANCE.<br />

8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />

NONE<br />

9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />

NONE<br />

7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM?<br />

NONE<br />

8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />

NONE<br />

9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />

THEY ARE SO AGE APPROPRIATE. THANK YOU.<br />

Y<br />

WHY?<br />

Arts in Education Service - School Evaluations <strong>2011</strong>-<strong>2012</strong><br />

Page 104 of 332


ARTIST: ERIC DRUCKER<br />

CONTRACT #: A7990<br />

TITLE OF PROGRAM: CLARINET PLAYER FOR THE SHOW - THE DROWSY<br />

CHAPERONE<br />

TYPE OF PROGRAM: ASSEMBLY<br />

DISTRICT/ SCHOOL: CHAPPAQUA/HORACE GREELEY HIGH SCHOOL<br />

# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />

# OF STUDENTS: 35 GRADE(S) 9-12<br />

DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 11/17-19/11<br />

NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />

STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />

1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />

ARTIST: ERIC LITWIN<br />

CONTRACT #: A8250<br />

TITLE OF PROGRAM: AUTHOR VISIT - MUSICAL STORIES<br />

TYPE OF PROGRAM: ASSEMBLY<br />

DISTRICT/ SCHOOL:<br />

# OF TEACHERS: 6<br />

ARDSLEY/CONCORD ROAD ELEM.<br />

# OF STUDENTS: 140 GRADE(S) K<br />

DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 1/30/12<br />

NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />

STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />

1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />

1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />

2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />

3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />

4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />

5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />

6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />

7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />

ERIC WAS A GREAT ADDITION TO OUR SHOW.<br />

8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />

NONE<br />

9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />

I HOPE TO WORK WITH HIM AGAIN.<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />

2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />

3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />

4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />

5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />

6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />

7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />

BEST ASSEMBLY WE'VE EVER HAD.<br />

8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />

NONE. KEEP IT UP.<br />

9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />

WE CAN'T WAIT TO HAVE HIM BACK.<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

N/<br />

ARTIST: ERIC ZOBACK<br />

CONTRACT #: A7867<br />

TITLE OF PROGRAM: SET DESIGN & CONSTRUCTION FOR THE FALL PLAY -<br />

THE TEMPEST<br />

TYPE OF PROGRAM: RESIDENCY<br />

DISTRICT/ SCHOOL:<br />

# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />

ARDSLEY/ARDSLEY HIGH SCHOOL<br />

# OF STUDENTS: 30 GRADE(S) 9-12<br />

DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 10/19-11/19/11<br />

NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />

STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 X STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />

ARTIST: ERIC ZOBACK<br />

CONTRACT #: A8083A<br />

TITLE OF PROGRAM: SET DESIGN & CONSTRUCTION FOR THE SENIOR<br />

REVUE<br />

TYPE OF PROGRAM: RESIDENCY<br />

DISTRICT/ SCHOOL:<br />

# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />

ARDSLEY/ARDSLEY HIGH SCHOOL<br />

# OF STUDENTS: GRADE(S) 12<br />

DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 12/1/11-1/21/12<br />

NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />

STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 X STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />

1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />

1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />

1.<br />

2.<br />

3.<br />

4.<br />

5.<br />

6.<br />

STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />

ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />

EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />

ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />

TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />

QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

N/<br />

7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />

ERIC DOES AN OUTSTANDING JOB. HIS CREATIVITY AND SENSE OF<br />

ASTHETICS ADDS TO OUR PRODUCTION.<br />

8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />

NONE<br />

9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />

THIS SET AN EXCELLENT EXAMPLE OF HOW ARTS ENHANCE NOT<br />

ONLY THE SHOW BUT STUDENTS EXPERIENCE WITH HOW SETS,<br />

TIME AND COLOR ENHANCE A PERFORMANCE.<br />

1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />

2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />

3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />

4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />

5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />

6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />

7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />

ALWAYS A PLEASURE TO WORK WITH. HIS PROFESSIONALISM<br />

SERVES AS A MODEL FOR OUR STUDENTS.<br />

8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />

NONE<br />

9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />

HE WORKS EFFICIENTLY WITH OUR REHEARSAL SCHEDULE AND<br />

THE SHOW LOOKS GREAT.<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

Arts in Education Service - School Evaluations <strong>2011</strong>-<strong>2012</strong><br />

Page 105 of 332


ARTIST: ERIC ZOBACK<br />

CONTRACT #: A8083B<br />

TITLE OF PROGRAM: SET DESIGN & CONSTRUCTION FOR THE SPRING<br />

MUSICAL<br />

TYPE OF PROGRAM: RESIDENCY<br />

DISTRICT/ SCHOOL:<br />

# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />

ARDSLEY/ARDSLEY HIGH SCHOOL<br />

# OF STUDENTS: GRADE(S) 9-12<br />

DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 2/6-3/17/12<br />

NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />

STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 X STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />

1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />

ARTIST: ERIC ZORK ALAN<br />

CONTRACT #: A8667<br />

TITLE OF PROGRAM: SLAM POETRY<br />

TYPE OF PROGRAM: RESIDENCY<br />

DISTRICT/ SCHOOL: WHITE PLAINS/MAMARONECK AVENUE ELEM. ELEM.<br />

# OF TEACHERS: 4<br />

# OF STUDENTS: 103 GRADE(S) 5<br />

DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 5/30-6/7/12<br />

NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />

STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 X STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4 X<br />

1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />

1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />

2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />

3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />

4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />

5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />

6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />

7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />

NONE<br />

8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />

NONE<br />

9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />

NONE<br />

4<br />

5<br />

4<br />

4<br />

5<br />

5<br />

1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />

2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />

3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />

4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />

5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />

6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />

7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />

ERIC ZORK ALAN CONTINUES TO ENGAGE AND EXCITE THE<br />

EMERGING POETS.<br />

8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />

PROVIDE MORE TIME FOR STUDENTS "FLASH" WRITIING AND<br />

SHARING.<br />

9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />

IT'S ALWAYS WONDERFUL TO HAVE THIS ARTIST VISIT US.<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

3<br />

ARTIST: ERICKA SCHLENKERMANN<br />

CONTRACT #: A8515<br />

TITLE OF PROGRAM: OBOE PLAYER FOR THE SHOW - BEAUTY AND THE<br />

BEAST<br />

TYPE OF PROGRAM: ASSEMBLY<br />

DISTRICT/ SCHOOL: PLEASANTVILLE/PLEASANTVILLE HIGH SCHOOL<br />

# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />

# OF STUDENTS: 400 GRADE(S) 9-12<br />

DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 3/9-17/12<br />

NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />

STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />

ARTIST: ERIKA LOUIZ<br />

CONTRACT #: A8040<br />

TITLE OF PROGRAM: CHOREOGRAPHER FOR THE SHOW - BEAUTY AND<br />

THE BEAST<br />

TYPE OF PROGRAM: RESIDENCY<br />

DISTRICT/ SCHOOL: PLEASANTVILLE/PLEASANTVILLE HIGH SCHOOL<br />

# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />

# OF STUDENTS: 70 GRADE(S) 9-12<br />

DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 12/15/11-3/9/12<br />

NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />

STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 X STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />

1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />

1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />

1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />

2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />

3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />

4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />

5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />

6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />

7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />

PROFESSIONAL QUALITYMUSIC GREAT SUPPORT FOR OUR<br />

PRODUCTION.<br />

8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />

NONE<br />

9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />

NONE<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

N/<br />

5<br />

N/<br />

1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />

2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />

3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />

4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />

5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />

6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />

7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />

HAVING STUDENTS WORK WITH A CHOREOGRAPHER WAS<br />

WONDERFUL NOT ONLY FOR EXPERIENCED DANCERS, WHO WERE<br />

CHALLENGED, BUT WITH NON DANCERS BEING INTRODUCED TO<br />

THE DANCE FORM OF ART.<br />

8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />

RUNNING THE PIECE IN SEQUENCE SO THE STUDENTS BECOME<br />

AWARE OF THE ENTIRE PIECE.<br />

9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />

ERIKA IS AN EXCELLENT CHOREOGRAPHER AND WORKED WELL<br />

WITH THE DIRECTOR.<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

N/<br />

Arts in Education Service - School Evaluations <strong>2011</strong>-<strong>2012</strong><br />

Page 106 of 332


ARTIST: ERIN GINSBURG<br />

CONTRACT #: A7927<br />

TITLE OF PROGRAM: PARIS CRAFTS<br />

TYPE OF PROGRAM: WORKSHOP<br />

DISTRICT/ SCHOOL: CHAPPAQUA/WESTORCHARD ELEM.<br />

# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />

# OF STUDENTS: 10 GRADE(S) 1-3<br />

DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 1/13-3/9/12<br />

NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />

STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 X STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4 X<br />

1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />

ARTIST: ERNEST SCHEFFLEIN<br />

CONTRACT #: A8514<br />

TITLE OF PROGRAM: CLARINET PLAYER FOR THE SHOW - BEAUTY AND<br />

THE BEAST<br />

TYPE OF PROGRAM: ASSEMBLY<br />

DISTRICT/ SCHOOL: PLEASANTVILLE/PLEASANTVILLE HIGH SCHOOL<br />

# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />

# OF STUDENTS: 400 GRADE(S) 9-12<br />

DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 3/9-17/12<br />

NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />

STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />

1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />

1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />

2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />

3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />

4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />

5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />

6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />

7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />

NONE<br />

8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />

NONE<br />

9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />

NONE<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />

2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />

3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />

4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />

5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />

6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />

7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />

HIGH, PROFESSIONAL QUALITY MUSIC SUPPORTING OUR<br />

PRODUCTION.<br />

8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />

NONE<br />

9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />

NONE<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

4<br />

5<br />

4<br />

ARTIST: EUGENE McLEER<br />

CONTRACT #: A8458<br />

TITLE OF PROGRAM: GUITAR PLAYER FOR THE SHOW - THIRTEEN<br />

COLONIES<br />

TYPE OF PROGRAM: ASSEMBLY<br />

DISTRICT/ SCHOOL: NEW ROCHELLE/DANIEL WEBSTER ELEM.<br />

# OF TEACHERS: 4<br />

# OF STUDENTS: 90 GRADE(S) 2<br />

DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 2/13-15/12<br />

NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />

STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />

1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />

ARTIST: FLOYD COOPER<br />

CONTRACT #: A8517<br />

TITLE OF PROGRAM: AUTHOR/ILLUSTRATOR VISIT<br />

TYPE OF PROGRAM: ASSEMBLY<br />

DISTRICT/ SCHOOL:<br />

# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />

BRIARCLIFF/TODD ELEM.<br />

# OF STUDENTS: 200 GRADE(S) 2 & 3<br />

DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 3/13/12<br />

NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />

STANDARD 1 STANDARD 2 STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />

1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />

1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />

2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />

3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />

4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />

5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />

6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />

7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />

NONE<br />

8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />

NONE<br />

9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />

NONE<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />

2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />

3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />

4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />

5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />

6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />

7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />

FLOYD IS AN OUTSTANDING TALENT WHO ENGAGES THE<br />

STUDENTS DURING THE ENTIRE PRESENTATION.<br />

8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />

NONE<br />

9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />

THE PRESENTATION WAS INTERACTIVE AND HAD A MULTI-<br />

SENSORY APPROACH. STUDENTS WERE FOCUSED THE ENTIRE<br />

TIME.<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

Arts in Education Service - School Evaluations <strong>2011</strong>-<strong>2012</strong><br />

Page 107 of 332


ARTIST: FOOD PLAY PRODUCTIONS<br />

CONTRACT #: A7668<br />

TITLE OF PROGRAM: FOOD PLAY SHOW<br />

TYPE OF PROGRAM: ASSEMBLY<br />

DISTRICT/ SCHOOL:<br />

# OF TEACHERS: 25<br />

BREWSTER/JFK ELEM.<br />

# OF STUDENTS: 24 GRADE(S) 1-3<br />

DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 9/23/11<br />

NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />

STANDARD 1 STANDARD 2 STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />

ARTIST: FOOD PLAY PRODUCTIONS<br />

CONTRACT #: A7765<br />

TITLE OF PROGRAM: FOOD PLAY SHOW<br />

TYPE OF PROGRAM: ASSEMBLY<br />

DISTRICT/ SCHOOL: NEW ROCHELLE/BARNARD EARLY CHILDHOOD CENT<br />

# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />

# OF STUDENTS: 650 GRADE(S) PRE K-2<br />

DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 3/8/12<br />

NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />

STANDARD 1 STANDARD 2 STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />

1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />

1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />

1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />

2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />

3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />

4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />

5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />

6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />

7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />

IT TEACHES A POWERFUL LESSON TO CHILDREN ABOUT EATING<br />

HEALTHY AND MAKING GOOD FOOD CHOICES.<br />

8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />

WHEN STUDENTS ALL SHOUT OUT AT ONCE, YOU CAN'T REALLY<br />

HEAR COMMENTS.<br />

9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />

NONE<br />

ARTIST: FOR ARTIST<br />

CONTRACT #: A7597<br />

TITLE OF PROGRAM: STEPHEN MANCUSI - FORENSIC ARTIST<br />

TYPE OF PROGRAM: ASSEMBLY/WORKSHOP<br />

DISTRICT/ SCHOOL:<br />

KATONAH/LEWISBORO/JOHN JAY HIGH SCHOOL<br />

# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />

# OF STUDENTS: 38 GRADE(S) 10-12<br />

DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE<br />

10/5 & 6/11<br />

NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />

STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 X STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

1.<br />

2.<br />

3.<br />

4.<br />

5.<br />

6.<br />

STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />

ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />

EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />

ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />

TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />

QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />

A GREAT WAY TO HELP DRIVE THE POINT THAT NUTRITION IS VERY<br />

IMPORTANT.<br />

8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />

NONE<br />

9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />

THANK YOU.<br />

ARTIST: FORARTIST<br />

CONTRACT #: A8834<br />

TITLE OF PROGRAM: STEPHEN MANCUSI - FORENSIC ARTIST<br />

TYPE OF PROGRAM: WORKSHOP<br />

DISTRICT/ SCHOOL: NEW ROCHELLE/NEW ROCHELLE HS<br />

# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />

# OF STUDENTS: 30 GRADE(S) 9-12<br />

DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 5/8 & 9/12<br />

NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />

STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 X STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />

1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />

1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />

1.<br />

2.<br />

3.<br />

4.<br />

5.<br />

6.<br />

STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />

ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />

EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />

ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />

TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />

QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />

STEVE WAS OUTSTANDING. THE CHILDREN WERE TOTALLY INTO<br />

CREATING THEIR COMPOSITE SKETCHES AND EVEN REQUESTED<br />

THAT HE RETURN TO TEACH THEM ABOUT CRIME SCENE<br />

SKETCHES. (UNFORTUNATELY NOT HIS EXPERTISE)<br />

8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />

STEVE HAS HIS PROGRAM PERFECTED.<br />

9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />

THANK YOU FOR ALL YOUR EFFORTS.<br />

1.<br />

2.<br />

3.<br />

4.<br />

5.<br />

6.<br />

STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />

ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />

EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />

ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />

TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />

QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />

STEPHEN HAS WORKED WITH MY FORENSICS CLASS FOR 12 YEARS<br />

AND STUDENTS STILL LOVE IT AND END UP WITH A CREATION THEY<br />

ARE VERY PROUD OF.<br />

8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />

WE JUST NEED MORE TIME WITH HIM.<br />

9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />

THIS IS AN ALTERNATIVE PROGRAM WITH AN AT RISK<br />

POPULATION. HE RELATES TO THE STUDENTS. HIS WORKSHOP IS<br />

RELEVANT, EDUCATIONALLY SOUND AND HIS MANNER IS<br />

TERRIFIC. ALWAYS A SUCCESS.<br />

Arts in Education Service - School Evaluations <strong>2011</strong>-<strong>2012</strong><br />

Page 108 of 332


ARTIST: FORARTIST<br />

CONTRACT #: A8314<br />

TITLE OF PROGRAM: STEPHEN MANCUSI - FORENSIC ARTIST<br />

TYPE OF PROGRAM: WORKSHOP<br />

DISTRICT/ SCHOOL: KATONAH/LEWISBORO/JOHN JAY HIGH SCHOOL<br />

# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />

# OF STUDENTS: 32 GRADE(S) 10-12<br />

DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 2/15-16/12<br />

NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />

STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 X STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />

ARTIST: FOSSIL CONNOISSEUR, INC./DINOSAUR<br />

CONTRACT #: A8093<br />

TITLE OF PROGRAM: FOSSIL ADVENTURE STORIES & CRAFTS<br />

TYPE OF PROGRAM: WORKSHOP<br />

DISTRICT/ SCHOOL: KATONAH/LEWISBORO/LEWISBORO ELEM.<br />

# OF TEACHERS: 3<br />

# OF STUDENTS: 55 GRADE(S) 1<br />

DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 4/16/12<br />

NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />

STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 X STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />

1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />

1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />

1.<br />

2.<br />

3.<br />

4.<br />

5.<br />

6.<br />

STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />

ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />

EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />

ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />

TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />

QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />

THIS WAS AN EXCELLENT PRESENTATION AND WORKSHOP.<br />

STUDENTS WERE FULLY ENGAGED THROUGHTOUT AND LEARNED<br />

SO MUCH.<br />

8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />

NONE<br />

9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />

IT WAS A HIT.<br />

1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />

2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />

3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />

4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />

5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />

6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />

7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />

THE STUDENTS ARE ENGAGED, INVOLVED AND INTERESTED.<br />

8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />

NONE<br />

9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />

NONE<br />

5<br />

N/<br />

4<br />

5<br />

5<br />

4<br />

ARTIST: FOSSIL CONNOISSEUR, INC./DINOSAUR<br />

CONTRACT #: A7787<br />

TITLE OF PROGRAM: FOSSIL ADVENTURE STORIES & CRAFTS<br />

TYPE OF PROGRAM: WORKSHOP<br />

DISTRICT/ SCHOOL: KATONAH/LEWISBORO/KATONAH ELEM. SCHOOL<br />

# OF TEACHERS: 3<br />

# OF STUDENTS: 60 GRADE(S) 1<br />

DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 3/26/12<br />

NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />

STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 X STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />

ARTIST: FRANCISCO NAVARRETE<br />

CONTRACT #: A8173<br />

TITLE OF PROGRAM: MARIACHI CITLALLI - MEXICAN CULTURAL FESTIVAL<br />

TYPE OF PROGRAM: ASSEMBLY<br />

DISTRICT/ SCHOOL:<br />

# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />

PELHAM/SIWANOY ELEM.<br />

# OF STUDENTS: 57 GRADE(S) 3<br />

DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 12/23/11<br />

NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />

STANDARD 1 STANDARD 2 STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4 X<br />

1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />

1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />

1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />

2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />

3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />

4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />

5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />

6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />

2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />

3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />

4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />

5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />

6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />

4<br />

5<br />

5<br />

4<br />

5<br />

N/<br />

7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM?<br />

AWESOME HANDS-ON PROGRAM.<br />

8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />

NONE<br />

9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />

NONE<br />

Y<br />

WHY?<br />

7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />

ALL OF THE STUDENTS LOVED THE PERFORMANCE AND THE<br />

PERFORMERS WERE FUN, CLEAR AND PURPOSEFUL IN THEIR<br />

PERFORMANCES.<br />

8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />

NONE<br />

9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />

NONE<br />

Arts in Education Service - School Evaluations <strong>2011</strong>-<strong>2012</strong><br />

Page 109 of 332


ARTIST: FRANK SALAMON ASSOCIATES CONTRACT #: A8540<br />

TITLE OF PROGRAM: EAST COAST CHAMBER ORCHESTRA<br />

TYPE OF PROGRAM: ASSEMBLY<br />

DISTRICT/ SCHOOL:<br />

# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />

PELHAM/HUTCHINSON ELEM.<br />

# OF STUDENTS: GRADE(S) 3-5<br />

DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 3/26/12<br />

NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />

STANDARD 1 STANDARD 2 STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />

1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />

ARTIST: FRED SMITH<br />

CONTRACT #: A8543<br />

TITLE OF PROGRAM: JAZZ / A HISTORY OF AFRICAN AMERICAN MUSICAL<br />

TRADITIONS<br />

TYPE OF PROGRAM: ASSEMBLY<br />

DISTRICT/ SCHOOL: MT.VERNON/MT. VERNON HIGH SCHOOL<br />

# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />

# OF STUDENTS: 200 GRADE(S) 9-12<br />

DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 2/15/12<br />

NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />

STANDARD 1 STANDARD 2 STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4 X<br />

1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />

1.<br />

2.<br />

3.<br />

4.<br />

5.<br />

6.<br />

STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />

ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />

EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />

ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />

TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />

QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

4<br />

5<br />

7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />

ENGAGED STUDENTS. ARTISTS WERE ENTHUSIASTIC AND SEEMED<br />

TO REALLY ENJOY ENTERTAINING THE STUDENTS.<br />

8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />

NONE<br />

9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />

OUTSTANDING, EDUCATIONAL AND AN INTERACTIVE ASSEMBLY.<br />

1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />

2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />

3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />

4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />

5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />

6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />

7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />

THE ASSEMBLY WAS ENGAGING AND PRESENTED FACTUAL<br />

INFORMATION.<br />

8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />

NONE<br />

9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />

EXCELLENT.<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

ARTIST: FRIEDA B., LLC<br />

CONTRACT #: A8153<br />

TITLE OF PROGRAM: RENATA BOWERS - AUTHOR VISIT<br />

TYPE OF PROGRAM: ASSEMBLY<br />

DISTRICT/ SCHOOL:<br />

# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />

LAKELAND/VAN CORT ELEM.<br />

# OF STUDENTS: 660 GRADE(S) K-5<br />

DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 5/2/12<br />

NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />

STANDARD 1 STANDARD 2 STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />

ARTIST: FRIEDA B., LLC<br />

CONTRACT #: A8634<br />

TITLE OF PROGRAM: RENATA BOWERS - AUTHOR VISIT<br />

TYPE OF PROGRAM: ASSEMBLY<br />

DISTRICT/ SCHOOL: BREWSTER/GARDEN STREET ELEM.<br />

# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />

# OF STUDENTS: GRADE(S) 2<br />

DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 3/16/12<br />

NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />

STANDARD 1 STANDARD 2 STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />

1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />

1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />

1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />

2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />

3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />

4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />

5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />

6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />

2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />

3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />

4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />

5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />

6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM?<br />

SHE IS FANTASTIC.<br />

Y<br />

WHY?<br />

7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y<br />

SHE IS A WONDERFUL AUTHOR AND VERY INSPIRING.<br />

WHY?<br />

8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />

NONE<br />

9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />

THANK YOU FOR COMING. OUR STUDENTS LOVED YOUR<br />

PRESENTATION. THEY ALSO LOVE YOUR BOOKS.<br />

8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />

NONE<br />

9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />

ONLY SUGGESTION WOULD BE TO WRITE MORE BOOKS.<br />

Arts in Education Service - School Evaluations <strong>2011</strong>-<strong>2012</strong><br />

Page 110 of 332


ARTIST: FRIEDA B., LLC<br />

CONTRACT #: A8499<br />

TITLE OF PROGRAM: RENATA BOWERS - AUTHOR VISIT<br />

TYPE OF PROGRAM: ASSEMBLY/WORKSHOP<br />

DISTRICT/ SCHOOL: KATONAH/LEWISBORO/INCREASE MILLER ELEM.<br />

# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />

# OF STUDENTS: 345 GRADE(S) K-5<br />

DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 2/8/12<br />

NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />

STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 X STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />

1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />

ARTIST: GAIL GHRISTIE<br />

CONTRACT #: A8178<br />

TITLE OF PROGRAM: CHOREOGRAPHER FOR THE SHOW - ANNIE GET<br />

YOUR GUN<br />

TYPE OF PROGRAM: RESIDENCY<br />

DISTRICT/ SCHOOL:<br />

# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />

TUCKAHOE/TUCKAHOE MS & HS<br />

# OF STUDENTS: GRADE(S) 6-12<br />

DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 1/12-3/19/12<br />

NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />

STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 X STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />

1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />

1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />

2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />

3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />

4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />

5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />

6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />

7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />

A TRULY EDUCATIONAL EXPERIENCE.<br />

8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />

NONE<br />

9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />

NONE<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />

2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />

3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />

4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />

5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />

6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />

7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />

EXCELLENT CHOREOGRAPHY AND WORKING WITH STUDENTS -<br />

ALWAYS GIVES 110%.<br />

8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />

NONE<br />

9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />

NONE<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

N/<br />

ARTIST: GAIL LEVINE<br />

CONTRACT #: A8657<br />

TITLE OF PROGRAM: AUTHOR VISIT<br />

TYPE OF PROGRAM: ASSEMBLY/WORKSHOP<br />

DISTRICT/ SCHOOL: BREWSTER/C.V. STARR INTERMEDIATE SCHOOL<br />

# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />

# OF STUDENTS: GRADE(S) 4 & 5<br />

DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 3/5-9/12<br />

NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />

STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />

ARTIST: GAIL LEVINE<br />

CONTRACT #: A8840<br />

TITLE OF PROGRAM: AUTHOR VISIT<br />

TYPE OF PROGRAM: ASSEMBLY<br />

DISTRICT/ SCHOOL: KATONAH/LEWISBORO/JOHN JAY MIDDLE SCHOOL<br />

# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />

# OF STUDENTS: 100 GRADE(S) 6<br />

DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 6/1/12<br />

NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />

STANDARD 1 STANDARD 2 STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />

1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />

1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />

1.<br />

2.<br />

3.<br />

4.<br />

5.<br />

6.<br />

STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />

ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />

EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />

ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />

TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />

QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />

MRS. LEVINE VISITED OUR SCHOOL FOR 3 DAYS. SHE DID WRITING<br />

WORKSHOPS - WONDERFUL AND ENRICHING FOR STUDENTS.<br />

8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />

NONE<br />

9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />

WONDERFUL VISIT.<br />

1.<br />

2.<br />

3.<br />

4.<br />

5.<br />

6.<br />

STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />

ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />

EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />

ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />

TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />

QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

N/<br />

7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />

GAIL ENGAGED STUDENTS IN LITERATURE AND SOCIOLOGY FOR<br />

THE BOOK' DAVE AT NIGHT'. THEY HAD READ THE BOOK AND THEY<br />

LOVED HEARING ABOUT THE REAL PERSON WHO INSPIRED THE<br />

BOOK.<br />

8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />

NONE<br />

9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />

STUDENTS LOVED THAT A REAL AUTHOR LIVED NEARBY AND THAT<br />

SHE WAS RELATED TO A CLASSMATE. ALSO, GAIL GOT THEM<br />

INTERESTED IN THE PAST.<br />

Arts in Education Service - School Evaluations <strong>2011</strong>-<strong>2012</strong><br />

Page 111 of 332


ARTIST: GARRISON ART CENTER<br />

CONTRACT #: A8768<br />

TITLE OF PROGRAM: CHRISTINA DIMARCO - ANCIENT ART OF<br />

SUMINAGASH<br />

TYPE OF PROGRAM: WORKSHOP<br />

DISTRICT/ SCHOOL: PEEKSKILL/PEEKSKILL MIDDLE SCHOOL<br />

# OF TEACHERS: 2<br />

# OF STUDENTS: 60 GRADE(S) 7 & 8<br />

DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 5/8-22/12<br />

NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />

STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 X STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4 X<br />

ARTIST: GEORGE CROOM<br />

CONTRACT #: A8443<br />

TITLE OF PROGRAM: COSTUME DESIGNER FOR THE SHOW - A FUNNY<br />

THING HAPPENED ON THE WAY TO THE FORUM<br />

TYPE OF PROGRAM: RESIDENCY<br />

DISTRICT/ SCHOOL: PUTNAM VALLEY/PUTNAM VALLEY HIGH SCHOOL<br />

# OF TEACHERS: 3<br />

# OF STUDENTS: 400 GRADE(S) 9-12<br />

DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 3/3-4/23/12<br />

NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />

STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 X STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />

1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />

1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />

1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />

2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />

3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />

4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />

5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />

6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />

7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />

STUDENTS WERE ENGAGED FOR THE WHOLE 3 SESSION<br />

WORKSHOP. STUDENTS WERE EAGER TO LEARN AND CREATE.<br />

8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />

NONE<br />

9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />

WOULD LOVE TO HAVE MORE TIME.<br />

5<br />

5<br />

4<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />

2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />

3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />

4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />

5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />

6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />

7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />

NONE<br />

8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />

NONE<br />

9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />

NONE<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

ARTIST: GEORGE CROOM<br />

CONTRACT #: A7779<br />

TITLE OF PROGRAM: COSTUME DESIGNER FOR THE SHOW - DRACULA<br />

TYPE OF PROGRAM: RESIDENCY<br />

DISTRICT/ SCHOOL: PUTNAM VALLEY/PUTNAM VALLEY HIGH SCHOOL<br />

# OF TEACHERS: 2<br />

# OF STUDENTS: 50 GRADE(S) 9-12<br />

DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 11/1-12/5/11<br />

NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />

STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 X STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />

1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />

ARTIST: GEORGE CROOM<br />

CONTRACT #: A8346<br />

TITLE OF PROGRAM: MUSIC DIRECTOR FOR THE SHOW - ONCE UPON A<br />

MATTRESS<br />

TYPE OF PROGRAM: RESIDENCY<br />

DISTRICT/ SCHOOL: GREENBURGH #7/WOODLANDS MS/HS<br />

# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />

# OF STUDENTS: GRADE(S) 7-12<br />

DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 1/23-3/31/12<br />

NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />

STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 X STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />

1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />

1.<br />

2.<br />

3.<br />

4.<br />

5.<br />

6.<br />

STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />

ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />

EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />

ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />

TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />

QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />

GEORGE IS CREATIVE, PROFESSIONAL, FUN TO WORK WITH AND<br />

THE STUDENTS LOVE WORKING WITH HIM.<br />

8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />

NONE<br />

9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />

NONE<br />

1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />

2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />

3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />

4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />

5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />

6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />

7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />

EXCELLENT PROGRAM.<br />

8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />

NONE<br />

9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />

NONE<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

Arts in Education Service - School Evaluations <strong>2011</strong>-<strong>2012</strong><br />

Page 112 of 332


ARTIST: GERALDINE P. WINTERROTH<br />

CONTRACT #: A8301<br />

TITLE OF PROGRAM: MUSICAL DIRECTOR FOR SPRING MUSICAL - BYE,<br />

BYE BIRDIE<br />

TYPE OF PROGRAM: RESIDENCY<br />

DISTRICT/ SCHOOL: IRVINGTON/IRVINGTON HIGH SCHOOL<br />

# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />

# OF STUDENTS: 600 GRADE(S) 9-12<br />

DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 1/17-3/17/12<br />

NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />

STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 X STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />

1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />

ARTIST: GERALDINE P. WINTERROTH<br />

CONTRACT #: A7634<br />

TITLE OF PROGRAM: MUSICAL DIRECTOR FOR THE SHOW - WIZARD OF OZ<br />

TYPE OF PROGRAM: RESIDENCY<br />

DISTRICT/ SCHOOL: IRVINGTON/IRVINGTON HIGH SCHOOL<br />

# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />

# OF STUDENTS: 650 GRADE(S) 9-12<br />

DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 9/19-11/6/11<br />

NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />

STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 X STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />

1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />

1.<br />

2.<br />

3.<br />

4.<br />

5.<br />

6.<br />

STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />

ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />

EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />

ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />

TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />

QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />

5<br />

5<br />

N/<br />

5<br />

5<br />

N/<br />

7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />

SHE IS A GREAT RESOURCE FOR HOW TO WORK WITH A STUDENT<br />

PIT ORCHESTRA.<br />

8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />

NONE<br />

9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />

NONE<br />

1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />

2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />

3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />

4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />

5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />

6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />

7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />

MOST SCHOOLS HAVE THEIR OWN MUSICAL. OUR GROUP<br />

PERFORMED FOR THE ELEMENTARY AND MIDDLE SCHOOL.<br />

8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />

NONE<br />

9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />

NONE<br />

5<br />

5<br />

3<br />

N/<br />

5<br />

N/<br />

ARTIST: GIANNA COZZALI<br />

CONTRACT #: A8502<br />

TITLE OF PROGRAM: THEATRE ARTS / SHOW PRODUCTION<br />

TYPE OF PROGRAM: RESIDENCY<br />

DISTRICT/ SCHOOL:<br />

# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />

TUCKAHOE/W. E. COTTLE ELEM.<br />

# OF STUDENTS: 530 GRADE(S) 4 & 5<br />

DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 2/12-6/12/12<br />

NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />

STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 X STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />

ARTIST: GINA KINGSLEY dba PAINT YOUR ART O<br />

CONTRACT #: A8029A<br />

TITLE OF PROGRAM: A STUDY OF MATISS I<br />

TYPE OF PROGRAM: WORKSHOP<br />

DISTRICT/ SCHOOL: NEW ROCHELLE/ISAAC YOUNG MIDDLE SCHOOL<br />

# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />

# OF STUDENTS: 15 GRADE(S) 8<br />

DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 12/1-23/11<br />

NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />

STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 X STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />

1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />

1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />

1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />

2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />

3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />

4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />

5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />

6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />

2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />

3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />

4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />

5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />

6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM?<br />

NONE<br />

8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />

NONE<br />

9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />

NONE<br />

Y<br />

WHY?<br />

7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />

THIS IS A WELL PRESENTED AND EXECUTED PROGRAM THAT<br />

RESULTS IN A FANTASTIC ART INSTALLATION IN THE BUILDING.<br />

8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />

NONE<br />

9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />

NONE<br />

Arts in Education Service - School Evaluations <strong>2011</strong>-<strong>2012</strong><br />

Page 113 of 332


ARTIST: GINA KINGSLEY dba PAINT YOUR ART O CONTRACT #: A8029B<br />

TITLE OF PROGRAM: A STUDY OF MATISS II<br />

TYPE OF PROGRAM: WORKSHOP<br />

DISTRICT/ SCHOOL: NEW ROCHELLE/ISAAC YOUNG MIDDLE SCHOOL<br />

# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />

# OF STUDENTS: 15 GRADE(S) 8<br />

DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 1/4-2/29/12<br />

NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />

STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 X STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />

ARTIST: GINA KINGSLEY dba PAINT YOUR ART O<br />

CONTRACT #: A8688<br />

TITLE OF PROGRAM: MOSAIC ANIMALS<br />

TYPE OF PROGRAM: WORKSHOP<br />

DISTRICT/ SCHOOL: NEW ROCHELLE/TRINITY ELEM. SCHOOL<br />

# OF TEACHERS: 4<br />

# OF STUDENTS: 150 GRADE(S) 1<br />

DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 4/4-6/7/12<br />

NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />

STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 X STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />

1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />

1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />

1.<br />

2.<br />

3.<br />

4.<br />

5.<br />

6.<br />

STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />

ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />

EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />

ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />

TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />

QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />

RELATES WELL WITH STUDENTS AND STAFF. FANTASTIC RESULTS.<br />

8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />

NONE<br />

9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />

NONE<br />

1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />

2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />

3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />

4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />

5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />

6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />

7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />

ALWAYS A GRATIFING EXPERIENCE.<br />

8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />

NONE<br />

9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />

NONE<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

ARTIST: GINA KINGSLEY dba PAINT YOUR ART O<br />

CONTRACT #: A8061A<br />

TITLE OF PROGRAM: POTTERY<br />

TYPE OF PROGRAM: WORKSHOP<br />

DISTRICT/ SCHOOL:<br />

# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />

PELHAM/PROSPECT HILL ELEM.<br />

# OF STUDENTS: 12 GRADE(S) K-2<br />

DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 1/13-3/9/12<br />

NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />

STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 X STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />

ARTIST: GINA KINGSLEY dba PAINT YOUR ART O<br />

CONTRACT #: A8061B<br />

TITLE OF PROGRAM: POTTERY<br />

TYPE OF PROGRAM: WORKSHOP<br />

DISTRICT/ SCHOOL:<br />

# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />

PELHAM/PROSPECT HILL ELEM.<br />

# OF STUDENTS: 12 GRADE(S) 3-5<br />

DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 1/13-3/9/12<br />

NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />

STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 X STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />

1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />

1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />

1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />

2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />

3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />

4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />

5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />

6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

N/<br />

1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />

2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />

3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />

4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />

5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />

6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

N/<br />

7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM?<br />

NONE<br />

Y<br />

WHY?<br />

7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM?<br />

NONE<br />

Y<br />

WHY?<br />

8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />

NONE<br />

9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />

NONE<br />

8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />

NONE<br />

9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />

NONE<br />

Arts in Education Service - School Evaluations <strong>2011</strong>-<strong>2012</strong><br />

Page 114 of 332


ARTIST: GINA NOTO<br />

CONTRACT #: A8119<br />

TITLE OF PROGRAM: CHOREOGRAPHER FOR THE SHOW - FOOTLOOSE<br />

TYPE OF PROGRAM: RESIDENCY<br />

DISTRICT/ SCHOOL: CHAPPAQUA/BELL MIDDLE SCHOOL<br />

# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />

# OF STUDENTS: GRADE(S) 5-8<br />

DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 1/17-3/25/12<br />

NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />

STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 X STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />

1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />

ARTIST: GLENN RHIAN<br />

CONTRACT #: A8513<br />

TITLE OF PROGRAM: PERCUSSION PLAYER FOR THE SHOW - BEAUTY<br />

AND THE BEAST<br />

TYPE OF PROGRAM: ASSEMBLY<br />

DISTRICT/ SCHOOL: PLEASANTVILLE/PLEASANTVILLE HIGH SCHOOL<br />

# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />

# OF STUDENTS: 400 GRADE(S) 9-12<br />

DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 3/9-17/12<br />

NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />

STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />

1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />

1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />

2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />

3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />

4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />

5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />

6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />

7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />

THE STUDENTS LOVE THIS PROGRAM.<br />

8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />

NONE<br />

9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />

NONE<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

N/<br />

1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />

2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />

3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />

4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />

5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />

6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />

7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />

PROFESSIONAL LEVEL MUSIC, ASSISTING STUDENT MUSICIANS.<br />

8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />

NONE<br />

9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />

NONE<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

ARTIST: GLOBAL LEARNING, INC. - DAVID JOHNS CONTRACT #: A7930<br />

TITLE OF PROGRAM: A WALK THROUGH EAST AFRICA<br />

TYPE OF PROGRAM: WORKSHOP<br />

DISTRICT/ SCHOOL: KATONAH/LEWISBORO/MEADOWPOND ELEM.<br />

# OF TEACHERS: 4<br />

# OF STUDENTS: GRADE(S) 3<br />

DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 2/17/12<br />

NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />

STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 X STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4 X<br />

ARTIST: GLOBAL LEARNING, INC. - DAVID JOHNS CONTRACT #: A8568<br />

TITLE OF PROGRAM: A WALK THROUGH EAST AFRICA<br />

TYPE OF PROGRAM: WORKSHOP<br />

DISTRICT/ SCHOOL: KATONAH/LEWISBORO/LEWISBORO ELEM.<br />

# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />

# OF STUDENTS: 80 GRADE(S) 3<br />

DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 3/30/12<br />

NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />

STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 X STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4 X<br />

1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />

1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />

1.<br />

2.<br />

3.<br />

4.<br />

5.<br />

6.<br />

STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />

ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />

EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />

ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />

TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />

QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />

STUDENTS HAD RELATABLE VISUAL SLIDES TO COMPARE LIFE IN<br />

THE UNITED STATES TO LIFE IN KENYA. IT IS REAL LIFE EXAMPLES.<br />

8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />

NONE<br />

9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />

STUDENTS ENJOY LEARNING ABOUT THE ARTIFACTS.<br />

1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />

2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />

3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />

4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />

5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />

6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />

7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />

NONE<br />

8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />

NONE<br />

9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />

NONE<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

Arts in Education Service - School Evaluations <strong>2011</strong>-<strong>2012</strong><br />

Page 115 of 332


ARTIST: GLOBAL LEARNING, INC. - DAVID JOHNS CONTRACT #: A8000<br />

TITLE OF PROGRAM: NATIVE AMERICAN ARTIFACTS<br />

TYPE OF PROGRAM: WORKSHOP<br />

DISTRICT/ SCHOOL:<br />

KATONAH/LEWISBORO/MEADOWPOND ELEM.<br />

# OF TEACHERS: 6<br />

# OF STUDENTS: 130 GRADE(S) 4<br />

DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE<br />

11/10/11<br />

NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />

STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 X STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4 X<br />

1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />

1.<br />

2.<br />

3.<br />

4.<br />

5.<br />

6.<br />

STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />

ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />

EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />

ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />

TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />

QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

N/<br />

7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />

THIS WORKSHOP FITS IN FANTASTICALLY WITH OUR SS<br />

CURRICULUM. THE ARTIFACTS DAVE PRESENTS TO OUR<br />

STUDENTS SUPPORTED THEIR UNDERSTANDING THAT ARTIFACTS<br />

OFTEN SERVE A DUAL PURPOSE - AN ARTISTIC EXPRESIVE<br />

DIMENSION AND AS A USEFUL PRODUCT.<br />

8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />

NONE<br />

9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />

NONE<br />

ARTIST: GREGORY NEMEC<br />

CONTRACT #: A8159<br />

TITLE OF PROGRAM: SET DESIGNER / PAINTER FOR THE SHOW - BEAUTY<br />

AND THE BEAST<br />

TYPE OF PROGRAM: RESIDENCY<br />

DISTRICT/ SCHOOL:<br />

PLEASANTVILLE/PLEASANTVILLE HIGH SCHOOL<br />

# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />

# OF STUDENTS: 1000 GRADE(S) 9-12<br />

DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE<br />

1/3-20/12<br />

NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />

STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 X STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />

1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />

1.<br />

2.<br />

3.<br />

4.<br />

5.<br />

6.<br />

STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />

ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />

EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />

ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />

TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />

QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />

THE OPPORTUNITY TO BE MENTERED BY A PROFESSIONAL ARTIST<br />

IS A WONDERFUL ADDITION TO OUR PRODUCTION. STUDENTS<br />

DEVELOP SCENE PAINTING SKILLS UNDER GREGORY'S TUTELAGE<br />

AS WELL AS LEADERSHIP AND WORK ETHICS.<br />

8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />

NONE<br />

9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />

NONE<br />

ARTIST: GRECO AUDIO SERVICE<br />

CONTRACT #: A8392<br />

TITLE OF PROGRAM: CHRISTOPHER GRECO - SOUND DESIGNER FOR THE<br />

SHOW - XANADU<br />

TYPE OF PROGRAM: WORKSHOP<br />

DISTRICT/ SCHOOL: CHAPPAQUA/HORACE GREELEY HIGH SCHOOL<br />

# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />

# OF STUDENTS: 200 GRADE(S) 9-12<br />

DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 4/9-21/12<br />

NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />

STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 X STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4 X<br />

1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />

1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />

2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />

3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />

4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />

5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />

6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />

7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />

IMPORTANT FOR STUDENTS TO SEE AND LEARN HOW ALLTHE<br />

ELEMENTS AND COMPONENTS OF A MUSICAL SHOW COME<br />

TOGETHER.<br />

8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />

NONE<br />

9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />

COMMITTED TO HIS CRAFT AND INVESTED IN THE QUALITY AND<br />

OUTCOME OF THE PRODUCTION. THE STUDENTS LEARNED A LOT.<br />

ARTIST: GRUMBLING GRYPHONS<br />

CONTRACT #: A8044<br />

TITLE OF PROGRAM: MYTH OF PERSEPHONE<br />

TYPE OF PROGRAM: ASSEMBLY/WORKSHOP<br />

DISTRICT/ SCHOOL: NEW ROCHELLE/COLUMBUS ELEM.<br />

# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />

# OF STUDENTS: GRADE(S) 4<br />

DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 12/21/11<br />

NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />

STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 X STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />

1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />

1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />

2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />

3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />

4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />

5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />

6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />

7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />

THE PROGRAM WAS A WONDERFUL ADDITION TO OUR GREEK<br />

MYTHOLOGY UNIT BY CREATING HANDS ON WORKSHOPS THAT<br />

REINFORCED LITERATURE.<br />

8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />

GIVING THE STUDENTS THEIR LINES AHEAD OF TIME MIGHT HAVE<br />

HELPED.<br />

9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />

THE ACTORS ARE INCREDIBLY TALENTED INDIVIDUALS. THEY HAD<br />

COSTUMES THAT WERE FANTASTIC AND BROUGHT THE<br />

CHARACTERS TO LIFE.<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

4<br />

4<br />

N/<br />

Arts in Education Service - School Evaluations <strong>2011</strong>-<strong>2012</strong><br />

Page 116 of 332


ARTIST: GWENVERIA M. SARGEANT<br />

CONTRACT #: A8474<br />

TITLE OF PROGRAM: FASHION DESIGNS<br />

TYPE OF PROGRAM: WORKSHOP<br />

DISTRICT/ SCHOOL: CROTON/PIERRE VAN CORT MIDDLE SCHOOL<br />

# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />

# OF STUDENTS: 22 GRADE(S) 5-8<br />

DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 2/15-5/9/12<br />

NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />

STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 X STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />

ARTIST: HAIFA BINT-KADI<br />

CONTRACT #: A8541<br />

TITLE OF PROGRAM: MOSAIC PROJECT<br />

TYPE OF PROGRAM: WORKSHOP<br />

DISTRICT/ SCHOOL: HASTINGS/FARRAGUT MIDDLE SCHOOL<br />

# OF TEACHERS: 2<br />

# OF STUDENTS: 35 GRADE(S) 6<br />

DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 4/2-5/31/12<br />

NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />

STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 X STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4 X<br />

1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />

1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />

1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />

2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />

3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />

4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />

5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />

6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />

7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />

THE STUDENTS ENJOYED THIS OPPORTUNITY TO LEARN ABOUT<br />

FASHION DESIGN AND CREATE THEIR OWN DESIGNS.<br />

8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />

NONE<br />

9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />

NONE<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />

2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />

3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />

4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />

5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />

6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />

7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />

TEACHERS SHOULD PLAN FOR EXTRA SCHEDUALING SESSIONS.<br />

8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />

HAVE LESSONS WITH JUST TEACHERS TO LEARN TOOLS AND<br />

TECHNIQUES BEFORE WORKING WITH CHILDREN. ITEMIZE<br />

MATERIALS, TOOL LIST AND EXPENSES BEFORE SUBMITTING<br />

PROGRAM REQUEST.<br />

9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />

PLAN FAR IN ADVANCE AND LEAVE EXTRA TIME.<br />

3<br />

4<br />

3<br />

3<br />

N/<br />

2<br />

ARTIST: HAIFA BINT-KADI<br />

CONTRACT #: A8785<br />

TITLE OF PROGRAM: MOSAIC PROJECT<br />

TYPE OF PROGRAM: WORKSHOP<br />

DISTRICT/ SCHOOL:<br />

# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />

PELHAM/COLONIAL ELEM.<br />

# OF STUDENTS: 220 GRADE(S) 2-5<br />

DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 5/8-22/12<br />

NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />

STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 X STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4 X<br />

ARTIST: HANS WILHELM, INC.<br />

CONTRACT #: A7574<br />

TITLE OF PROGRAM: AUTHOR VISIT<br />

TYPE OF PROGRAM: ASSEMBLY<br />

DISTRICT/ SCHOOL:<br />

# OF TEACHERS: 6<br />

BYRAM HILLS/COMAN HILL ELEM.<br />

# OF STUDENTS: 180 GRADE(S) K<br />

DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 12/20/11<br />

NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />

STANDARD 1 STANDARD 2 STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />

1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />

1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />

1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />

2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />

3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />

4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />

5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />

6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />

7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />

THIS IS A VERY MEANINGFUL PROJECT. SHE IS A VERY INSPIRING<br />

ARTIST. GREAT WITH ALL AGES.<br />

8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />

SOMETIMES IT IS VERY DIFFICULT TO CONTACT HER AND IT TAKES<br />

A FEW DAYS FOR HER TO RESPOND.<br />

9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />

I HOPE WE CAN CONTINUE THIS PROJECT.<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />

2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />

3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />

4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />

5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />

6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />

7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />

AGAIN HE WOWED OUR STUDENTS. THE CHILDREN WERE<br />

MESMERIZED BY HIS STORYTELLING AND EXPERIENCES.<br />

8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />

NONE<br />

9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />

NONE<br />

4<br />

4<br />

4<br />

4<br />

4<br />

4<br />

Arts in Education Service - School Evaluations <strong>2011</strong>-<strong>2012</strong><br />

Page 117 of 332


ARTIST: HEATHER CAPRETTI<br />

CONTRACT #: A8176<br />

TITLE OF PROGRAM: TECH DIRECTOR FOR THE SHOW - ANNIE GET YOUR<br />

GUN<br />

TYPE OF PROGRAM: RESIDENCY<br />

DISTRICT/ SCHOOL:<br />

# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />

TUCKAHOE/TUCKAHOE MS & HS<br />

# OF STUDENTS: GRADE(S) 6-12<br />

DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 1/10-3/19/12<br />

NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />

STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 X STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />

1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />

ARTIST: HEIDI CAREY<br />

CONTRACT #: A7975<br />

TITLE OF PROGRAM: ARCHITECTURE AROUND US<br />

TYPE OF PROGRAM: WORKSHOP<br />

DISTRICT/ SCHOOL:<br />

# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />

PELHAM/COLONIAL ELEM.<br />

# OF STUDENTS: 10 GRADE(S) 2-5<br />

DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 12/2/11-2/10/12<br />

NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />

STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 X STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4 X<br />

1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />

1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />

2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />

3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />

4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />

5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />

6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />

7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />

HEATHER WORKED WELL WITH THE CHILDREN<br />

8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />

NONE<br />

9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />

NONE<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

N/<br />

1.<br />

2.<br />

3.<br />

4.<br />

5.<br />

6.<br />

STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />

ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />

EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />

ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />

TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />

QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

N/<br />

N/<br />

7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />

HEIDI IS A WARM, PLEASANT AND KNOWLEDGEABLE TEACHER.<br />

SHE KEPT THE CHILDREN ENGAGED WHILE LEARNING ABOUT<br />

ARCHITECTURE, BUILDING TYPES AND PARTS AND KEY STYLISTIC<br />

ELEMENTS.<br />

8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />

NONE<br />

9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />

NONE<br />

ARTIST: HEIDI CAREY<br />

CONTRACT #: A8370<br />

TITLE OF PROGRAM: ARCHITECTURE AROUND US<br />

TYPE OF PROGRAM: WORKSHOP<br />

DISTRICT/ SCHOOL:<br />

# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />

PELHAM/HUTCHINSON ELEM.<br />

# OF STUDENTS: 7 GRADE(S) K-5<br />

DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 2/6-3/12/12<br />

NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />

STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 X STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4 X<br />

ARTIST: HEIDI CAREY<br />

CONTRACT #: A7687<br />

TITLE OF PROGRAM: ARCHITECTURE AROUND US<br />

TYPE OF PROGRAM: WORKSHOP<br />

DISTRICT/ SCHOOL:<br />

# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />

PELHAM/SIWANOY ELEM.<br />

# OF STUDENTS: 9 GRADE(S) 3-5<br />

DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 10/3-12/5/11<br />

NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />

STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 X STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4 X<br />

1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />

1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />

1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />

2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />

3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />

4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />

5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />

6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />

2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />

3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />

4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />

5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />

6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM?<br />

HEIDI IS A PLEASURE TO WORK WITH.<br />

Y<br />

WHY?<br />

7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM?<br />

NONE<br />

Y<br />

WHY?<br />

8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />

NONE<br />

9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />

NONE<br />

8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />

NONE<br />

9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />

NONE<br />

Arts in Education Service - School Evaluations <strong>2011</strong>-<strong>2012</strong><br />

Page 118 of 332


ARTIST: HEIDI CAREY<br />

CONTRACT #: A8359<br />

TITLE OF PROGRAM: ARCHITECTURE AROUND US<br />

TYPE OF PROGRAM: WORKSHOP<br />

DISTRICT/ SCHOOL:<br />

# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />

PELHAM/SIWANOY ELEM.<br />

# OF STUDENTS: 9 GRADE(S) 3-5<br />

DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 2/1-4/4/12<br />

NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />

STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 X STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4 X<br />

ARTIST: HEIDI CAREY<br />

CONTRACT #: A7592<br />

TITLE OF PROGRAM: ARCHITECTURE AROUND US<br />

TYPE OF PROGRAM: WORKSHOP<br />

DISTRICT/ SCHOOL:<br />

# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />

PELHAM/HUTCHINSON ELEM.<br />

# OF STUDENTS: 11 GRADE(S) K-5<br />

DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 10/11-12/9/11<br />

NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />

STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 X STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4 X<br />

1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />

1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />

1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />

2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />

3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />

4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />

5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />

6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />

7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />

NONE<br />

8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />

NONE<br />

9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />

NONE<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

1.<br />

2.<br />

3.<br />

4.<br />

5.<br />

6.<br />

STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />

ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />

EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />

ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />

TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />

QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />

THIS WAS THE FIRST TIME WE OFFERED ARCHITECTURE AND THE<br />

STUDENTS RESPONSE WAS INCREDIBLE. HEIDI WAS EXTREMELY<br />

ORGANIZED AND HAD A WELL PLANNED CURRICULUM.<br />

8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />

NONE<br />

9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />

NONE<br />

ARTIST: HELEN LESTER<br />

CONTRACT #: A7674<br />

TITLE OF PROGRAM: AUTHOR VISIT<br />

TYPE OF PROGRAM: ASSEMBLY<br />

DISTRICT/ SCHOOL:<br />

# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />

SOMERS/PRIMROSE ELEM.<br />

# OF STUDENTS: 230 GRADE(S) 2<br />

DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 10/12/11<br />

NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />

STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />

ARTIST: HELEN LESTER<br />

CONTRACT #: A8492<br />

TITLE OF PROGRAM: AUTHOR VISIT<br />

TYPE OF PROGRAM: ASSEMBLY<br />

DISTRICT/ SCHOOL:<br />

# OF TEACHERS: 2<br />

NORTH SALEM/PQ ELEM.<br />

# OF STUDENTS: 120 GRADE(S) K<br />

DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 3/28/12<br />

NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />

STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />

1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />

1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />

1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />

2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />

3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />

4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />

5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />

6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />

2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />

3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />

4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />

5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />

6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />

4.5<br />

4.5<br />

5<br />

4.5<br />

4<br />

4.5<br />

7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM?<br />

WE LOVE HELEN AND TACKY.<br />

Y<br />

WHY?<br />

7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM?<br />

VERY AGE APPROPRIATE AND ENGAGING.<br />

Y<br />

WHY?<br />

8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />

NONE<br />

9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />

NONE<br />

8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />

NONE<br />

9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />

THANK YOU.<br />

Arts in Education Service - School Evaluations <strong>2011</strong>-<strong>2012</strong><br />

Page 119 of 332


ARTIST: HELEN LESTER<br />

CONTRACT #: A8154<br />

TITLE OF PROGRAM: AUTHOR VISIT<br />

TYPE OF PROGRAM: ASSEMBLY<br />

DISTRICT/ SCHOOL:<br />

# OF TEACHERS: 4<br />

CARMEL/PATERSON ELEM.<br />

# OF STUDENTS: 115 GRADE(S) K<br />

DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 3/22/12<br />

NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />

STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />

ARTIST: HIP PICKLES PERCUSSION<br />

CONTRACT #: A8085<br />

TITLE OF PROGRAM: STOP THE BULLYING SHOW<br />

TYPE OF PROGRAM: ASSEMBLY<br />

DISTRICT/ SCHOOL: KATONAH/LEWISBORO/MEADOWPOND ELEM.<br />

# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />

# OF STUDENTS: 340 GRADE(S) K-5<br />

DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 12/14/11<br />

NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />

STANDARD 1 STANDARD 2 STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />

1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />

1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />

1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />

2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />

3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />

4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />

5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />

6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />

7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />

SHE WAS A DELIGHT. THE CHILDREN LOVED HER AND HER<br />

WONDERFUL CHARACTERS.<br />

8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />

NONE<br />

9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />

I'D LOVE TO HAVE A PRINTABLE COLORING PAGE FOR MY<br />

CHILDREN TO USE AS A FOLLOW UP.<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />

2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />

3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />

4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />

5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />

6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />

7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? ? WHY?<br />

3<br />

3<br />

3<br />

3<br />

3<br />

N/<br />

PRESENTER WAS A BIT SLOPPY IN APPEARANCE. AT TIMES<br />

PERFORMANCE DRAGGED ESPECIALLY WITH YOUNGER AUDIENCE.<br />

8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />

FINE TUNE THE MESSAGE. DON'T ASK SINGLE STUDENTS TO<br />

DANCE IN FRONT OF CROWD ALONE.<br />

9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />

THE STUDENTS ENJOYED THE MUSICAL PART BUT SOME WERE<br />

UNABLE TO GET THE MESSAGE. IT WAS TOO SUTTLE.<br />

ARTIST: HIP PICKLES PERCUSSION<br />

CONTRACT #: A7772<br />

TITLE OF PROGRAM: STOP THE BULLYING SHOW<br />

TYPE OF PROGRAM: ASSEMBLY<br />

DISTRICT/ SCHOOL: PLEASANTVILLE/BEDFORD ROAD ELEM.<br />

# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />

# OF STUDENTS: 640 GRADE(S) K-4<br />

DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 10/12/11<br />

NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />

STANDARD 1 STANDARD 2 STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />

ARTIST: HIP PICKLES PERCUSSION<br />

CONTRACT #: A8870<br />

TITLE OF PROGRAM: STOP THE BULLYING SHOW<br />

TYPE OF PROGRAM: ASSEMBLY<br />

DISTRICT/ SCHOOL: NEW ROCHELLE/WARD ELEM. SCHOOL<br />

# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />

# OF STUDENTS: GRADE(S) K-2<br />

DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 6/5/12<br />

NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />

STANDARD 1 STANDARD 2 STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />

1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />

1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />

1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />

2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />

3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />

4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />

5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />

6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />

7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />

THE MESSAGE WAS EXCELLENT AND THE DRUMMING REALLY<br />

CAPTURED THE STUDENTS ATTENTION.<br />

8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />

THINGS WERE A BIT SLOW AND SOME CHILDREN BECAME<br />

UNFOCUSED. PERHAPS INFUSING MORE DRUMMING FOR THE<br />

YOUNGER AUDIENCE.<br />

9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />

OVERALL WONDERFUL PROGRAM.<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />

2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />

3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />

4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />

5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />

6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />

7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />

WE WOULD RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM TO OTHERS.<br />

8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />

ARTISTS SHOULD RELATE MUSICAL THEMES TO THAT OF SCHOOL<br />

AND OR GRADE LEVELS CURRICULUM THEMES.<br />

9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />

THE ASSEMBLY ENGAGED STUDENTS INTEREST. HOWEVER, MORE<br />

STRUCTURE IS NEEDED DURING THOSE SHORT INTERMISSIONS<br />

WHEN THE PERFORMERS ARE NOT PLAYING MUSIC.<br />

5<br />

3<br />

3<br />

3<br />

3<br />

2<br />

Arts in Education Service - School Evaluations <strong>2011</strong>-<strong>2012</strong><br />

Page 120 of 332


ARTIST: HIP PICKLES PERCUSSION<br />

CONTRACT #: A8767<br />

TITLE OF PROGRAM: STOP THE BULLYING SHOW<br />

TYPE OF PROGRAM: ASSEMBLY<br />

DISTRICT/ SCHOOL:<br />

# OF TEACHERS: 3<br />

MTP/HAWTHORNE ELEM.<br />

# OF STUDENTS: 423 GRADE(S) K-2<br />

DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 4/17/12<br />

NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />

STANDARD 1 STANDARD 2 STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />

ARTIST: HOPE DAVIS dba HOPE DAVIS FINE ART<br />

CONTRACT #: A7816<br />

TITLE OF PROGRAM: EYES ON ART<br />

TYPE OF PROGRAM: RESIDENCY<br />

DISTRICT/ SCHOOL:<br />

# OF TEACHERS: 24<br />

IRVINGTON/DOWS LANE ELEM.<br />

# OF STUDENTS: 500 GRADE(S) K-3<br />

DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 11/2 & 18/11<br />

NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />

STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 X STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />

1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />

1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />

1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />

2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />

3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />

4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />

5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />

6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />

5<br />

4<br />

4<br />

4<br />

4<br />

N/<br />

1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />

2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />

3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />

4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />

5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />

6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />

THE STUDENTS LOVED THE PERFORMANCE. THE MUSIC WAS<br />

GREAT AND THE PERFORMERS WERE ENTHUSIASTIC. THERE<br />

WERE OPPORTUNITIES FOR STUDENT PARTICIPATION<br />

THROUGHTOUT.<br />

8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />

THE PERFORMANCE COULD USE SOME EDITING IN ORDER TO<br />

MAKE IT LESS WORDY AND MORE CONCISE.<br />

9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />

NONE<br />

7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />

INTERACTIVE WITH STUDENTS. SOLIDIFIES ELEMENTS OF ART<br />

CURRICULUM.<br />

8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />

NONE<br />

9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />

NONE<br />

ARTIST: HOWARD KILIK<br />

CONTRACT #: A8349<br />

TITLE OF PROGRAM: MUSICAL DIRECTOR FOR SENIOR MUSICAL - XANADU<br />

TYPE OF PROGRAM: RESIDENCY<br />

DISTRICT/ SCHOOL: CHAPPAQUA/HORACE GREELEY HIGH SCHOOL<br />

# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />

# OF STUDENTS: 200 GRADE(S) 12<br />

DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 1/30-4/21/12<br />

NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />

STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 X STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />

ARTIST: HUDSON VAGABOND PUPPETS CONTRACT #: A8855<br />

TITLE OF PROGRAM: LOIS BOHEVESKY - MASKS & MYTHOLOGY<br />

TYPE OF PROGRAM: RESIDENCY<br />

DISTRICT/ SCHOOL: PLEASANTVILLE/PLEASANTVILLE MIDDLE SCHOOL<br />

# OF TEACHERS: 3<br />

# OF STUDENTS: 140 GRADE(S) 6<br />

DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 6/4-6/12<br />

NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />

STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 X STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4 X<br />

1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />

1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />

1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />

2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />

3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />

4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />

5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />

6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />

7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />

IMPORTANT FOR THE STUDENTS TO SEE HOW ALL THE<br />

COMPONENTS OF A MUSICAL SHOW COME TOGETHER.<br />

8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />

NONE<br />

9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />

HOWARD IS EXTREMELY TALENTED AND DEDICATED TO HIS<br />

CRAFT. HE IS AN EXCEPTIONAL MUSICAL DIRECTOR WITH A RARE<br />

GIFT OF BEING ABLE TO TEACH STUDENTS WITH VARYING LEVELS<br />

OF MUSICAL KNOWLEDGE AND ABILITIES.<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />

2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />

3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />

4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />

5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />

6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />

7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />

LOIS IS AN EXPERT IN HER FIELD. SHE KNOWS ACTING AND SHE<br />

KNOWS MYTHOLOGY.<br />

8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />

NONE<br />

9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />

NONE<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

Arts in Education Service - School Evaluations <strong>2011</strong>-<strong>2012</strong><br />

Page 121 of 332


ARTIST: HUDSON VALLEY SHAKESPEARE FESTI<br />

CONTRACT #: A8713<br />

TITLE OF PROGRAM: ACCESS SHAKESPEARE<br />

TYPE OF PROGRAM: ASSEMBLY<br />

DISTRICT/ SCHOOL: BYRAM HILLS/BYRAM HILLS HIGH SCHOOL<br />

# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />

# OF STUDENTS: 228 GRADE(S) 10<br />

DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 5/2/12<br />

NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />

STANDARD 1 STANDARD 2 STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4 X<br />

1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />

ARTIST: HUDSON VALLEY SHAKESPEARE FESTI CONTRACT #: A7908<br />

TITLE OF PROGRAM: FREE WILL SHAKESPEARE WORKSHOPS &<br />

PERFORMANCE<br />

TYPE OF PROGRAM: WORKSHOP<br />

DISTRICT/ SCHOOL: KATONAH/LEWISBORO/JOHN JAY HIGH SCHOOL<br />

# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />

# OF STUDENTS: 85 GRADE(S) 10<br />

DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 12/12-16/11<br />

NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />

STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4 X<br />

1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />

1.<br />

2.<br />

3.<br />

4.<br />

5.<br />

6.<br />

STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />

ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />

EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />

ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />

TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />

QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />

4<br />

5<br />

4<br />

5<br />

5<br />

N/<br />

7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />

THE PERFORMERS ALWAYS DO A BRILLIANT JOB MAKING THE<br />

PLAY ACCESSIBLE TO STUDENTS.<br />

8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />

IT MIGHT BE APPROPRIATE TO HAVE MORE QUESTIONS PREPARED.<br />

9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />

NONE<br />

1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />

2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />

3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />

4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />

5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />

6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />

7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />

THE PROGRAM OFFERED HANDS-ON ENGAGEMENT FOR<br />

STUDENTS. IT SERVED TO HELP THEM APPRECIATE<br />

SHAKESPEARS' LANGUAGE.<br />

8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />

NONE<br />

9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />

NONE<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

ARTIST: HUDSON VALLEY SHAKESPEARE FESTI CONTRACT #: A8122<br />

TITLE OF PROGRAM: FREE WILL WORKSHOPS / ROMEO & JULIET<br />

TYPE OF PROGRAM: ASSEMBLY/WORKSHOP<br />

DISTRICT/ SCHOOL: LAKELAND/LAKELAND HIGH SCHOOL<br />

# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />

# OF STUDENTS: GRADE(S) 9<br />

DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 3/8-4/26/12<br />

NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />

STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4 X<br />

ARTIST: HUDSON VALLEY SHAKESPEARE FESTI CONTRACT #: A8826<br />

TITLE OF PROGRAM: MIDSUMMER NIGHT'S DREAM<br />

TYPE OF PROGRAM: WORKSHOP<br />

DISTRICT/ SCHOOL: PLEASANTVILLE/PLEASANTVILLE MIDDLE SCHOOL<br />

# OF TEACHERS: 2<br />

# OF STUDENTS: 25 GRADE(S) 7<br />

DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 5/15-16/12<br />

NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />

STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 X STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4 X<br />

1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />

1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />

1.<br />

2.<br />

3.<br />

4.<br />

5.<br />

6.<br />

STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />

ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />

EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />

ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />

TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />

QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />

A TERRIFIC PROGRAM THAT REACHED OUT TO ALL STUDENTS AND<br />

GOT THEM INVOLVED AND EXCITED.<br />

8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />

NONE<br />

9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />

JUST KEEP ON COMING. WONDERFUL.<br />

1.<br />

2.<br />

3.<br />

4.<br />

5.<br />

6.<br />

STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />

ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />

EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />

ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />

TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />

QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />

4<br />

5<br />

5<br />

4<br />

4<br />

4<br />

7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />

WONDERFUL WORKSHOP, IT GAVE THE STUDENTS A GOOD GRASP<br />

OF SHAKESPEARE AND ACTING SKILLS.<br />

8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />

MAYBE NEXT TIME SPEND A BIT MORE TIME ON THE PLAY.<br />

9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />

THE STUDENTS HAD A GOOD TIME.<br />

Arts in Education Service - School Evaluations <strong>2011</strong>-<strong>2012</strong><br />

Page 122 of 332


ARTIST: HUDSON VALLEY SHAKESPEARE FESTI<br />

CONTRACT #: A8615<br />

TITLE OF PROGRAM: ROMEO & JULIET<br />

TYPE OF PROGRAM: ASSEMBLY<br />

DISTRICT/ SCHOOL:<br />

# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />

MTP/WESTLAKE MIDDLE SCHOOL<br />

# OF STUDENTS: GRADE(S) 8<br />

DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 5/11/12<br />

NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />

STANDARD 1 STANDARD 2 STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4 X<br />

ARTIST: HUDSON VALLEY SHAKESPEARE FESTI CONTRACT #: A8270B<br />

TITLE OF PROGRAM: SHAKESPEARE WORKSHOP<br />

TYPE OF PROGRAM: WORKSHOP<br />

DISTRICT/ SCHOOL: CHAPPAQUA/BELL MIDDLE SCHOOL<br />

# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />

# OF STUDENTS: 180 GRADE(S) 8<br />

DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 6/5 & 6/12<br />

NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />

STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 X STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4 X<br />

1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />

1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />

1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />

2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />

3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />

4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />

5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />

6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />

4<br />

5<br />

5<br />

4<br />

5<br />

N/<br />

1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />

2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />

3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />

4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />

5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />

6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

N/<br />

N/<br />

7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y<br />

THEY DID A GREAT JOB AND A NICE PERFORMANCE.<br />

WHY?<br />

7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM?<br />

CHILDREN RESPONDED VERY WELL TO ACTORS.<br />

Y<br />

WHY?<br />

8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />

MAYBE PROVIDE A STUDY GUIDE PRIOR TO THE SHOW.<br />

9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />

NONE<br />

8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />

NONE<br />

9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />

NONE<br />

ARTIST: HUDSON VALLEY SHAKESPEARE FESTI CONTRACT #: A8270A<br />

TITLE OF PROGRAM: SHAKESPEARE WORKSHOP<br />

TYPE OF PROGRAM: WORKSHOP<br />

DISTRICT/ SCHOOL: CHAPPAQUA/SEVEN BRIDGES MIDDLE SCHOOL<br />

# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />

# OF STUDENTS: 150 GRADE(S) 8<br />

DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 4/26 & 27/12<br />

NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />

STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4 X<br />

ARTIST: HUDSON VALLEY SHAKESPEARE FESTI CONTRACT #: A7649<br />

TITLE OF PROGRAM: STUDENTS ON STAGE<br />

TYPE OF PROGRAM: WORKSHOP<br />

DISTRICT/ SCHOOL: NEW ROCHELLE/JEFFERSON ELEM.<br />

# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />

# OF STUDENTS: 95 GRADE(S) 5<br />

DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 11/15 & 16/11<br />

NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />

STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4 X<br />

1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />

1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />

1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />

2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />

3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />

4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />

5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />

6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />

7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />

EXCELLENT INTRO TO PERFORMING PLAY.<br />

8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />

NONE<br />

9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />

NONE<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

N/<br />

1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />

2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />

3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />

4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />

5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />

6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />

7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />

THE ARTISTS WERE EXCEPTIONALLY WONDERFUL WITH THE<br />

STUDENTS. THE STUDENTS WERE ENGAGED AND INTERESTED.<br />

8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />

NONE<br />

9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />

FANTASTIC.<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

Arts in Education Service - School Evaluations <strong>2011</strong>-<strong>2012</strong><br />

Page 123 of 332


ARTIST: HUGA TUGA CREATIONS, LLC<br />

CONTRACT #: A7913<br />

TITLE OF PROGRAM: READING ROCKS SHOW<br />

TYPE OF PROGRAM: ASSEMBLY<br />

DISTRICT/ SCHOOL:<br />

# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />

OSSINING/BROOKSIDE ELEM.<br />

# OF STUDENTS: 720 GRADE(S) 1 & 2<br />

DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 11/18/11<br />

NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />

STANDARD 1 STANDARD 2 STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />

ARTIST: HUGA TUGA CREATIONS, LLC<br />

CONTRACT #: A7524<br />

TITLE OF PROGRAM: READING ROCKS SHOW<br />

TYPE OF PROGRAM: ASSEMBLY<br />

DISTRICT/ SCHOOL: LAKELAND/GEORGE WASHINGTON ELEM.<br />

# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />

# OF STUDENTS: 425 GRADE(S) K-5<br />

DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 9/21/11<br />

NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />

STANDARD 1 STANDARD 2 STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />

1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />

1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />

1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />

2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />

3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />

4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />

5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />

6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />

7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />

NONE<br />

8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />

NONE<br />

9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />

NONE<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />

2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />

3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />

4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />

5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />

6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />

7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />

VERY ENTHUSIASTIC PROGRAM, DEDICATED TO GETTING<br />

STUDENTS EXCITED ABOUT BOOKS AND READING.<br />

8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />

NONE<br />

9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />

JOE IS WONDERFUL TO WORK WITH. HE IS VERY ACCOMODATING<br />

IN SCHEDULING AND HE GIVES 100% TO HIS PROGRAM.<br />

5<br />

5<br />

4<br />

4<br />

4<br />

5<br />

ARTIST: HYPOTHETRICAL THEATRE COMPANY CONTRACT #: A7520<br />

TITLE OF PROGRAM: ELLIS ISLAND STORIES<br />

TYPE OF PROGRAM: ASSEMBLY<br />

DISTRICT/ SCHOOL:<br />

# OF TEACHERS: 5<br />

CHAPPAQUA/GRAFFLIN ELEM.<br />

# OF STUDENTS: 117 GRADE(S) 4<br />

DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 10/20/11<br />

NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />

STANDARD 1 STANDARD 2 STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4 X<br />

ARTIST: HYPOTHETRICAL THEATRE COMPANY CONTRACT #: A8587<br />

TITLE OF PROGRAM: ELLIS ISLAND STORIES<br />

TYPE OF PROGRAM: ASSEMBLY<br />

DISTRICT/ SCHOOL: CHAPPAQUA/ROARING BROOK ELEM.<br />

# OF TEACHERS: 5<br />

# OF STUDENTS: 92 GRADE(S) 4<br />

DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 5/22/12<br />

NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />

STANDARD 1 STANDARD 2 STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4 X<br />

1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />

1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />

1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />

2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />

3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />

4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />

5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />

6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />

7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />

BRINGS THE STUDY OF IMMIGRATION TO LIFE.<br />

8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />

NONE<br />

9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />

EXCELLENT.<br />

4<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

N/<br />

1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />

2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />

3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />

4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />

5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />

6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />

7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />

THOUGHTFUL AND ENGAGING.<br />

8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />

WE WERE HAPPY TO SEE THE NEW INSPECTOR WHO WAS MORE<br />

EASILY UNDERSTOOD AND SPOKE SLOWLY.<br />

9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />

A GREAT PROGRAM.<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

N/<br />

Arts in Education Service - School Evaluations <strong>2011</strong>-<strong>2012</strong><br />

Page 124 of 332


ARTIST: HYPOTHETRICAL THEATRE COMPANY CONTRACT #: A7646<br />

TITLE OF PROGRAM: ELLIS ISLAND STORIES<br />

TYPE OF PROGRAM: ASSEMBLY<br />

DISTRICT/ SCHOOL: CHAPPAQUA/WESTORCHARD ELEM.<br />

# OF TEACHERS: 6<br />

# OF STUDENTS: 123 GRADE(S) 4<br />

DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 10/6/11<br />

NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />

STANDARD 1 STANDARD 2 STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4 X<br />

ARTIST: IAN C. DRIVER<br />

CONTRACT #: A7545<br />

TITLE OF PROGRAM: DIRECTOR - FALL DRAMA<br />

TYPE OF PROGRAM: RESIDENCY<br />

DISTRICT/ SCHOOL: BRIARCLIFF/BRIARCLIFF HIGH SCHOOL<br />

# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />

# OF STUDENTS: GRADE(S) 9-12<br />

DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 9/6-11/21/11<br />

NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />

STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 X STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />

1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />

1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />

1.<br />

2.<br />

3.<br />

4.<br />

5.<br />

6.<br />

STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />

ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />

EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />

ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />

TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />

QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

N/<br />

7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />

IT IS A WONDERFUL SHOW THAT BRINGS THE IMMIGRATION STORY<br />

TO LIFE.<br />

8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />

NONE<br />

9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />

NONE<br />

ARTIST: IAN C. DRIVER<br />

CONTRACT #: A8124<br />

TITLE OF PROGRAM: DIRECTOR - SPRING MUSICAL<br />

TYPE OF PROGRAM: RESIDENCY<br />

DISTRICT/ SCHOOL:<br />

BRIARCLIFF/BRIARCLIFF MIDDLE SCHOOL<br />

# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />

# OF STUDENTS: 40 GRADE(S) 6-8<br />

DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE<br />

3/19-6/15/12<br />

NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />

STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 X STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />

1.<br />

2.<br />

3.<br />

4.<br />

5.<br />

6.<br />

STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />

ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />

EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />

ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />

TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />

QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

4<br />

7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />

HE DOES EXCELLENT WORK WITH OUR THEATRICAL PRODUCTION<br />

STUDENTS. HIS KNOWLEDGE AND INSIGHT OF STAGE CRAFT AND<br />

THEATRE IS EXCEPTIONAL. STUDENTS GROW FROM AND ENJOY<br />

HIS WORK.<br />

8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />

NONE<br />

9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />

ARTIST:<br />

NONE<br />

IAN C. DRIVER<br />

TITLE OF PROGRAM: DIRECTOR - WINTER MUSICAL<br />

TYPE OF PROGRAM: RESIDENCY<br />

DISTRICT/ SCHOOL:<br />

BRIARCLIFF/BRIARCLIFF HIGH SCHOOL<br />

CONTRACT #: A7719<br />

# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />

# OF STUDENTS: GRADE(S) 9-12<br />

DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE<br />

12/1/11-3/16/12<br />

NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />

STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 X STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />

1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />

1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />

1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />

2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />

3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />

4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />

5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />

6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />

2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />

3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />

4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />

5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />

6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

4<br />

5<br />

7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM?<br />

NONE<br />

8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />

NONE<br />

9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />

NONE<br />

Y<br />

WHY?<br />

7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />

IAN HAS FANTASTIC VISION AND INSIGHT. AN UNKNOWN SHOW<br />

BECAME AN EXCELLENT EXPERIENCE.<br />

8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />

NONE<br />

9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />

NONE<br />

Arts in Education Service - School Evaluations <strong>2011</strong>-<strong>2012</strong><br />

Page 125 of 332


ARTIST: IDA MOLDONADO<br />

CONTRACT #: A7613<br />

TITLE OF PROGRAM: TILE ART<br />

TYPE OF PROGRAM: WORKSHOP<br />

DISTRICT/ SCHOOL:<br />

# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />

PELHAM/HUTCHINSON ELEM.<br />

# OF STUDENTS: 9 GRADE(S) 3-5<br />

DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 10/11-11/22/11<br />

NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />

STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 X STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />

ARTIST: IRA McINTOSH<br />

CONTRACT #: A8475<br />

TITLE OF PROGRAM: CATSKILL MOUNTAIN MUSIC TWIST & TROUT<br />

TYPE OF PROGRAM: ASSEMBLY<br />

DISTRICT/ SCHOOL: LAKELAND/COPPER BEECH MIDDLE SCHOOL<br />

# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />

# OF STUDENTS: 50 GRADE(S) 7<br />

DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 4/30/12<br />

NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />

STANDARD 1 STANDARD 2 STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4 X<br />

1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />

1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />

1.<br />

2.<br />

3.<br />

4.<br />

5.<br />

6.<br />

STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />

ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />

EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />

ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />

TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />

QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />

SHE WAS A PLEASURE TO WORK WITH. THE STUDENTS ENJOYED<br />

THE END RESULT.<br />

8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />

NONE<br />

9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />

NONE<br />

1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />

2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />

3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />

4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />

5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />

6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />

7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />

IRA OBVIOUSLY LOVES WHAT HE DOES AND TRANSMITS THAT<br />

ENERGY AND EXCITEMENT TO THE STUDENTS. THE SONGS HE<br />

CHOSE FOR THE DAY SUPPORTED WHAT WE ARE LEARNING IN<br />

CLASS.<br />

8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />

NONE<br />

9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />

HOPE WE CAN GET HIM BACK NEXT YEAR.<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

ARTIST: J. HENRY FAIR, LLC CONTRACT #: A8669<br />

TITLE OF PROGRAM: VISUAL ARTIST - PHOTOGRAPHER / INDUSTRIAL<br />

SCARS<br />

TYPE OF PROGRAM: ASSEMBLY<br />

DISTRICT/ SCHOOL: KATONAH/LEWISBORO/JOHN JAY HIGH SCHOOL<br />

# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />

# OF STUDENTS: 87 GRADE(S) 11 & 12<br />

DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 3/19/12<br />

NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />

STANDARD 1 STANDARD 2 STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />

1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />

ARTIST: JACOB GREENE<br />

CONTRACT #: A8836<br />

TITLE OF PROGRAM: SOUND DESIGNER FOR THE SPRING CONCERT<br />

TYPE OF PROGRAM: RESIDENCY<br />

DISTRICT/ SCHOOL: KATONAH/LEWISBORO/JOHN JAY HIGH SCHOOL<br />

# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />

# OF STUDENTS: 450 GRADE(S) 9-12<br />

DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 5/23-6/4/12<br />

NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />

STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 X STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />

1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />

1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />

2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />

3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />

4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />

5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />

6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />

7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />

OPENED STUDENTS EYES TO LANDSCAPE DESTRUCTION BY<br />

INDUSTRIALIZATION ANDTECHNOLOGY.<br />

8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />

NONE<br />

9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />

THE STUDENTS LOVED THE PRESENTATION.<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />

2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />

3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />

4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />

5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />

6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />

7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />

NONE<br />

8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />

NONE<br />

9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />

NONE<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

Arts in Education Service - School Evaluations <strong>2011</strong>-<strong>2012</strong><br />

Page 126 of 332


ARTIST: JACOB GREENE<br />

CONTRACT #: A8164<br />

TITLE OF PROGRAM: SOUND DESIGNER FOR THE WINTER CONCERT<br />

TYPE OF PROGRAM: RESIDENCY<br />

DISTRICT/ SCHOOL: KATONAH/LEWISBORO/JOHN JAY HIGH SCHOOL<br />

# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />

# OF STUDENTS: 400 GRADE(S) 9-12<br />

DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 1/9-30/12<br />

NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />

STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 X STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />

ARTIST: JACQUELINE SOCCODATO<br />

CONTRACT #: A7617D<br />

TITLE OF PROGRAM: BALLROOM DANCING<br />

TYPE OF PROGRAM: WORKSHOP<br />

DISTRICT/ SCHOOL:<br />

# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />

PELHAM/HUTCHINSON ELEM.<br />

# OF STUDENTS: 13 GRADE(S) 4 & 5<br />

DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 10/12-11/23/11<br />

NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />

STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 X STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4 X<br />

1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />

1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />

1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />

2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />

3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />

4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />

5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />

6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />

7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />

NONE<br />

8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />

NONE<br />

9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />

NONE<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

1.<br />

2.<br />

3.<br />

4.<br />

5.<br />

6.<br />

STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />

ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />

EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />

ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />

TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />

QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />

TREMENDOUS TURNOUT FROM STUDENTS. THEY LOOK FORWARD<br />

TO LEARNING NEW STEPS WEEK AFTER WEEK.<br />

8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />

NONE<br />

9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />

NONE<br />

ARTIST: JACQUELINE SOCCODATO<br />

CONTRACT #: A8368D<br />

TITLE OF PROGRAM: BALLROOM DANCING<br />

TYPE OF PROGRAM: WORKSHOP<br />

DISTRICT/ SCHOOL:<br />

# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />

PELHAM/HUTCHINSON ELEM.<br />

# OF STUDENTS: 9 GRADE(S) 4 & 5<br />

DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 2/8-4/4/12<br />

NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />

STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 X STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4 X<br />

ARTIST: JACQUELINE SOCCODATO<br />

CONTRACT #: A7617A<br />

TITLE OF PROGRAM: EVERY DAY ART I<br />

TYPE OF PROGRAM: WORKSHOP<br />

DISTRICT/ SCHOOL:<br />

# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />

PELHAM/HUTCHINSON ELEM.<br />

# OF STUDENTS: 12 GRADE(S) 4 & 5<br />

DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 10/11-11/22/11<br />

NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />

STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 X STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />

1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />

1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />

1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />

2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />

3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />

4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />

5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />

6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />

2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />

3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />

4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />

5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />

6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />

GREAT ADDITION TO EXISTING CURRICULUM. BOTH BOYS AND<br />

GIRLS PARTICIPATED.<br />

8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />

NONE<br />

9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />

NONE<br />

7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />

THIS CONTINUES TO BE ONE OF THE MORE POPULAR CLASSES.<br />

STUDENTS LOVE TO SEE WHAT THEY CAN CREATE USING<br />

EVERYDAY ITEMS.<br />

8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />

NONE<br />

9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />

NONE<br />

Arts in Education Service - School Evaluations <strong>2011</strong>-<strong>2012</strong><br />

Page 127 of 332


ARTIST: JACQUELINE SOCCODATO<br />

CONTRACT #: A8368A<br />

TITLE OF PROGRAM: EVERY DAY ART I<br />

TYPE OF PROGRAM: WORKSHOP<br />

DISTRICT/ SCHOOL:<br />

# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />

PELHAM/HUTCHINSON ELEM.<br />

# OF STUDENTS: 12 GRADE(S) 4 & 5<br />

DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 2/3-3/30/12<br />

NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />

STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 X STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />

ARTIST: JACQUELINE SOCCODATO<br />

CONTRACT #: A7617B<br />

TITLE OF PROGRAM: EVERY DAY ART II<br />

TYPE OF PROGRAM: WORKSHOP<br />

DISTRICT/ SCHOOL:<br />

# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />

PELHAM/HUTCHINSON ELEM.<br />

# OF STUDENTS: 12 GRADE(S) 2 & 3<br />

DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 10/13-12/8/11<br />

NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />

STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 X STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />

1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />

1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />

1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />

2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />

3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />

4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />

5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />

6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />

7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />

STUDENTS LOVED IT.<br />

8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />

NONE<br />

9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />

NONE<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

1.<br />

2.<br />

3.<br />

4.<br />

5.<br />

6.<br />

STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />

ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />

EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />

ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />

TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />

QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />

JACQUELINE IS ORGANIZED AND PUNCTUAL. THE STUDENTS LOVE<br />

TO SEE WHAT THEY CAN CREATE OUT OF EVERYDAY ITEMS.<br />

8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />

NONE<br />

9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />

NONE<br />

ARTIST: JACQUELINE SOCCODATO<br />

CONTRACT #: A8368B<br />

TITLE OF PROGRAM: EVERY DAY ART II<br />

TYPE OF PROGRAM: WORKSHOP<br />

DISTRICT/ SCHOOL:<br />

# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />

PELHAM/HUTCHINSON ELEM.<br />

# OF STUDENTS: 12 GRADE(S) K & 1<br />

DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 2/9-4/5/12<br />

NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />

STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 X STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />

ARTIST: JACQUELINE SOCCODATO<br />

CONTRACT #: A8368C<br />

TITLE OF PROGRAM: EVERY DAY ART III<br />

TYPE OF PROGRAM: WORKSHOP<br />

DISTRICT/ SCHOOL:<br />

# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />

PELHAM/HUTCHINSON ELEM.<br />

# OF STUDENTS: 12 GRADE(S) 2 & 3<br />

DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 2/14-4/3/12<br />

NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />

STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 X STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />

1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />

1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />

1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />

2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />

3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />

4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />

5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />

6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />

7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />

GREAT INTRODUCTION TO ART FOR YOUNG STUDENTS.<br />

8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />

NONE<br />

9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />

NONE<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

1.<br />

2.<br />

3.<br />

4.<br />

5.<br />

6.<br />

STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />

ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />

EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />

ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />

TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />

QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />

THIS CLASS CONTINUES TO BE THE MOST POPULAR YEAR AFTER<br />

YEAR.<br />

8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />

NONE<br />

9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />

NONE<br />

Arts in Education Service - School Evaluations <strong>2011</strong>-<strong>2012</strong><br />

Page 128 of 332


ARTIST: JACQUELINE SOCCODATO<br />

CONTRACT #: A7617C<br />

TITLE OF PROGRAM: EVERY DAY ART III<br />

TYPE OF PROGRAM: WORKSHOP<br />

DISTRICT/ SCHOOL:<br />

# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />

PELHAM/HUTCHINSON ELEM.<br />

# OF STUDENTS: 13 GRADE(S) K & 1<br />

DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 10/17-12/5/11<br />

NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />

STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 X STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />

ARTIST: JACQUELINE WOODSON, LLC<br />

CONTRACT #: A8305<br />

TITLE OF PROGRAM: AUTHOR VISIT<br />

TYPE OF PROGRAM: ASSEMBLY<br />

DISTRICT/ SCHOOL: NEW ROCHELLE/ISAAC YOUNG MIDDLE SCHOOL<br />

# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />

# OF STUDENTS: GRADE(S) 6-8<br />

DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 1/31/12<br />

NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />

STANDARD 1 STANDARD 2 STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />

1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />

1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />

1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />

2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />

3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />

4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />

5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />

6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />

7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />

STUDENTS CONTINUE TO LOVE THIS CLASS. JACQUELINE IS A<br />

PLEASURE TO WORK WITH AND AN ASSET TO OUR PROGRAM.<br />

8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />

NONE<br />

9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />

NONE<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

1.<br />

2.<br />

3.<br />

4.<br />

5.<br />

6.<br />

STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />

ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />

EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />

ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />

TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />

QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />

THE STUDENTS WERE ABLE TO CONNECT WITH HER AND SHE WITH<br />

THEM.<br />

8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />

NONE<br />

9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />

VERY DOWN TO EARTH, A LOVELY PERSON.<br />

ARTIST: JACQUELINE ZERRATE<br />

CONTRACT #: A8207<br />

TITLE OF PROGRAM: SPANISH ART, CULTURE & LANGUAGE<br />

TYPE OF PROGRAM: WORKSHOP<br />

DISTRICT/ SCHOOL: CHAPPAQUA/ROARING BROOK ELEM.<br />

# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />

# OF STUDENTS: 9 GRADE(S) 2-4<br />

DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 1/13-3/9/12<br />

NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />

STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 X STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4 X<br />

ARTIST: JACQUELINE ZERRATE<br />

CONTRACT #: A8279A<br />

TITLE OF PROGRAM: SPANISH ART, CULTURE & LANGUAGE I<br />

TYPE OF PROGRAM: WORKSHOP<br />

DISTRICT/ SCHOOL: KATONAH/LEWISBORO/KATONAH ELEM. SCHOOL<br />

# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />

# OF STUDENTS: 9 GRADE(S) 1-3<br />

DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 1/17-3/13/12<br />

NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />

STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 X STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4 X<br />

1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />

1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />

1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />

2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />

3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />

4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />

5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />

6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />

4<br />

5<br />

4<br />

4<br />

5<br />

4<br />

1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />

2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />

3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />

4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />

5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />

6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />

JACKIE MAKES ALL CLASSES INTERESTING WITH PUPPETS,<br />

PROJECTS, ETC.<br />

8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />

NONE<br />

9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />

NONE<br />

7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM?<br />

EXCELLENT TEACHER. EXCELLENT CLASS.<br />

8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />

NONE<br />

9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />

NONE<br />

Y<br />

WHY?<br />

Arts in Education Service - School Evaluations <strong>2011</strong>-<strong>2012</strong><br />

Page 129 of 332


ARTIST: JACQUELINE ZERRATE<br />

CONTRACT #: A8264A<br />

TITLE OF PROGRAM: SPANISH ART, CULTURE & LANGUAGE I<br />

TYPE OF PROGRAM: WORKSHOP<br />

DISTRICT/ SCHOOL:<br />

# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />

NORTH SALEM/PQ ELEM.<br />

# OF STUDENTS: 9 GRADE(S) 1 & 2<br />

DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 1/23-3/19/12<br />

NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />

STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 X STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4 X<br />

ARTIST: JACQUELINE ZERRATE<br />

CONTRACT #: A8741A<br />

TITLE OF PROGRAM: SPANISH ART, CULTURE & LANGUAGE I<br />

TYPE OF PROGRAM: WORKSHOP<br />

DISTRICT/ SCHOOL:<br />

# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />

NORTH SALEM/PQ ELEM.<br />

# OF STUDENTS: 9 GRADE(S) 1 & 2<br />

DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 4/16-6/11/12<br />

NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />

STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 X STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4 X<br />

1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />

1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />

1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />

2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />

3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />

4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />

5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />

6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />

2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />

3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />

4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />

5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />

6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM?<br />

NONE<br />

Y<br />

WHY?<br />

7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM?<br />

NONE<br />

Y<br />

WHY?<br />

8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />

NONE<br />

9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />

NONE<br />

8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />

NONE<br />

9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />

NONE<br />

ARTIST: JACQUELINE ZERRATE<br />

CONTRACT #: A7984AB<br />

TITLE OF PROGRAM: SPANISH ART, CULTURE & LANGUAGE I + II<br />

TYPE OF PROGRAM: WORKSHOP<br />

DISTRICT/ SCHOOL: KATONAH/LEWISBORO/INCREASE MILLER ELEM.<br />

# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />

# OF STUDENTS: 16 GRADE(S) 1-5<br />

DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 12/12/11-3/16/12<br />

NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />

STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 X STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4 X<br />

ARTIST: JACQUELINE ZERRATE<br />

CONTRACT #: A7502AB<br />

TITLE OF PROGRAM: SPANISH ART, CULTURE & LANGUAGE I + II<br />

TYPE OF PROGRAM: WORKSHOP<br />

DISTRICT/ SCHOOL: KATONAH/LEWISBORO/INCREASE MILLER ELEM.<br />

# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />

# OF STUDENTS: 8 GRADE(S) 1-5<br />

DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 10/7-12/23/11<br />

NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />

STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 X STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4 X<br />

1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />

1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />

1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />

2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />

3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />

4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />

5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />

6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />

2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />

3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />

4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />

5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />

6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y<br />

WE ARE SO LUCKY TO HAVE HER TEACHING HERE.<br />

WHY?<br />

7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />

SHE IS A WONDERFUL TEACHER WITH A LOT OF EXPERIENCE.<br />

8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />

NONE<br />

9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />

NONE<br />

8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />

NONE<br />

9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />

NONE<br />

Arts in Education Service - School Evaluations <strong>2011</strong>-<strong>2012</strong><br />

Page 130 of 332


ARTIST: JACQUELINE ZERRATE<br />

CONTRACT #: A8279B<br />

TITLE OF PROGRAM: SPANISH ART, CULTURE & LANGUAGE II<br />

TYPE OF PROGRAM: WORKSHOP<br />

DISTRICT/ SCHOOL: KATONAH/LEWISBORO/KATONAH ELEM. SCHOOL<br />

# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />

# OF STUDENTS: 9 GRADE(S) 2-4<br />

DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 1/18-3/14/12<br />

NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />

STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 X STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4 X<br />

ARTIST: JACQUELINE ZERRATE<br />

CONTRACT #: A8693B<br />

TITLE OF PROGRAM: SPANISH ART, CULTURE & LANGUAGE II<br />

TYPE OF PROGRAM: WORKSHOP<br />

DISTRICT/ SCHOOL: KATONAH/LEWISBORO/KATONAH ELEM. SCHOOL<br />

# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />

# OF STUDENTS: 8 GRADE(S) 2-4<br />

DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 4/11-5/30/12<br />

NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />

STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 X STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4 X<br />

1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />

1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />

1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />

2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />

3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />

4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />

5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />

6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />

2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />

3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />

4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />

5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />

6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM?<br />

EXCELLENT TEACHER. EXCELLENT CLASS.<br />

8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />

NONE<br />

9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />

NONE<br />

Y<br />

WHY?<br />

7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />

SHE IS ENTHUSIASTIC, DEPENDABLE AND THE STUDENTS LIKED<br />

HER.<br />

8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />

NONE<br />

9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />

NONE<br />

ARTIST: JACQUELINE ZERRATE<br />

CONTRACT #: A8264B<br />

TITLE OF PROGRAM: SPANISH ART, CULTURE & LANGUAGE II<br />

TYPE OF PROGRAM: WORKSHOP<br />

DISTRICT/ SCHOOL:<br />

# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />

NORTH SALEM/PQ ELEM.<br />

# OF STUDENTS: 9 GRADE(S) 1 & 2<br />

DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 1/24-3/20/12<br />

NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />

STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 X STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4 X<br />

ARTIST: JACQUELINE ZERRATE<br />

CONTRACT #: A7623B<br />

TITLE OF PROGRAM: SPANISH ART, CULTURE & LANGUAGE II<br />

TYPE OF PROGRAM: WORKSHOP<br />

DISTRICT/ SCHOOL:<br />

# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />

NORTH SALEM/PQ ELEM.<br />

# OF STUDENTS: 10 GRADE(S) 3-5<br />

DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 10/4-11/22/11<br />

NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />

STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 X STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4 X<br />

1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />

1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />

1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />

2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />

3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />

4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />

5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />

6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />

2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />

3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />

4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />

5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />

6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM?<br />

NONE<br />

Y<br />

WHY?<br />

7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM?<br />

NONE<br />

Y<br />

WHY?<br />

8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />

NONE<br />

9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />

NONE<br />

8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />

NONE<br />

9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />

NONE<br />

Arts in Education Service - School Evaluations <strong>2011</strong>-<strong>2012</strong><br />

Page 131 of 332


ARTIST: JACQUELINE ZERRATE<br />

CONTRACT #: A8741C<br />

TITLE OF PROGRAM: SPANISH ART, CULTURE & LANGUAGE III<br />

TYPE OF PROGRAM: WORKSHOP<br />

DISTRICT/ SCHOOL:<br />

# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />

NORTH SALEM/PQ ELEM.<br />

# OF STUDENTS: 9 GRADE(S) 1-5<br />

DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 4/19-6/7/12<br />

NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />

STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 X STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4 X<br />

ARTIST: JACQUELINE ZERRATE<br />

CONTRACT #: A8264C<br />

TITLE OF PROGRAM: SPANISH ART, CULTURE & LANGUAGE III<br />

TYPE OF PROGRAM: WORKSHOP<br />

DISTRICT/ SCHOOL:<br />

# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />

NORTH SALEM/PQ ELEM.<br />

# OF STUDENTS: 9 GRADE(S) 1 & 5<br />

DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 1/26-3/29/12<br />

NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />

STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 X STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4 X<br />

1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />

1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />

1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />

2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />

3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />

4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />

5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />

6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />

2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />

3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />

4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />

5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />

6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM?<br />

NONE<br />

Y<br />

WHY?<br />

7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM?<br />

NONE<br />

Y<br />

WHY?<br />

8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />

NONE<br />

9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />

NONE<br />

8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />

NONE<br />

9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />

NONE<br />

ARTIST: JACQUELINE ZERRATE<br />

CONTRACT #: A8279C<br />

TITLE OF PROGRAM: SPANISH ART, CULTURE & LANGUAGE III<br />

TYPE OF PROGRAM: WORKSHOP<br />

DISTRICT/ SCHOOL: KATONAH/LEWISBORO/KATONAH ELEM. SCHOOL<br />

# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />

# OF STUDENTS: 7 GRADE(S) 3-5<br />

DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 1/19-3/15/12<br />

NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />

STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 X STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4 X<br />

ARTIST: JACQUELINE ZERRATE<br />

CONTRACT #: A7984CD<br />

TITLE OF PROGRAM: SPANISH ART, CULTURE & LANGUAGE III + IV<br />

TYPE OF PROGRAM: WORKSHOP<br />

DISTRICT/ SCHOOL: KATONAH/LEWISBORO/INCREASE MILLER ELEM.<br />

# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />

# OF STUDENTS: 16 GRADE(S) 1-5<br />

DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 3/19-6/15/12<br />

NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />

STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 X STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4 X<br />

1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />

1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />

1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />

2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />

3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />

4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />

5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />

6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />

2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />

3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />

4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />

5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />

6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM?<br />

EXCELLENT TEACHER. EXCELLENT CLASS.<br />

Y<br />

WHY?<br />

7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM?<br />

NONE<br />

Y<br />

WHY?<br />

8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />

NONE<br />

9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />

NONE<br />

8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />

NONE<br />

9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />

NONE<br />

Arts in Education Service - School Evaluations <strong>2011</strong>-<strong>2012</strong><br />

Page 132 of 332


ARTIST: JAHPAN ENTERTAINMENT, INC. CONTRACT #: A8849<br />

TITLE OF PROGRAM: CARIBBEAN STEEL DRUM SHOW<br />

TYPE OF PROGRAM: ASSEMBLY<br />

DISTRICT/ SCHOOL:<br />

# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />

BRIARCLIFF/TODD ELEM.<br />

# OF STUDENTS: 112 GRADE(S) 5<br />

DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 5/31/12<br />

NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />

STANDARD 1 STANDARD 2 STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4 X<br />

ARTIST: JAMES B. TAYLOR<br />

CONTRACT #: A8403<br />

TITLE OF PROGRAM: TALES OF SLAVERY IN NEW YORK<br />

TYPE OF PROGRAM: WORKSHOP<br />

DISTRICT/ SCHOOL: PUTNAM VALLEY/PUTNAM VALLEY ELEM.<br />

# OF TEACHERS: 4<br />

# OF STUDENTS: 15 GRADE(S) 4<br />

DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 2/10/12<br />

NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />

STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 X STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4 X<br />

1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />

1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />

1.<br />

2.<br />

3.<br />

4.<br />

5.<br />

6.<br />

STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />

ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />

EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />

ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />

TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />

QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />

STUDENTS WERE VERY ENTHUSIASTIC AND ACTIVELY ENGAGED IN<br />

THE PROGRAM.<br />

8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />

NONE<br />

9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />

LOOKING FORWARD TO HAVING THEM BACK.<br />

1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />

2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />

3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />

4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />

5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />

6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />

7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />

GREAT PROGRAM - TIES INTO 4TH GRADE CURRICULUM.<br />

8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />

NONE<br />

9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />

WE HAVE HIM BACK ALMOST EVERY YEAR.<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

N/<br />

ARTIST: JAMES B. TAYLOR<br />

CONTRACT #: A7528<br />

TITLE OF PROGRAM: TALES OF SLAVERY IN THE NORTH<br />

TYPE OF PROGRAM: ASSEMBLY/WORKSHOP<br />

DISTRICT/ SCHOOL:<br />

# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />

LAKELAND/VAN CORT ELEM.<br />

# OF STUDENTS: 125 GRADE(S) 4<br />

DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 2/15 & 16/12<br />

NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />

STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 X STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4 X<br />

1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />

ARTIST: JAMES BRITT<br />

CONTRACT #: A8160<br />

TITLE OF PROGRAM: SET DESIGNER FOR THE SHOW - BEAUTY AND THE<br />

BEAST<br />

TYPE OF PROGRAM: RESIDENCY<br />

DISTRICT/ SCHOOL: PLEASANTVILLE/PLEASANTVILLE HIGH SCHOOL<br />

# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />

# OF STUDENTS: 1000 GRADE(S) 9-12<br />

DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 1/3-3/10/12<br />

NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />

STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 X STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />

1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />

1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />

2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />

3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />

4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />

5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />

6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />

7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />

MR. TAYLOR HAS A GREAT MANNER WITH CHILDREN AND HIS<br />

PRESENTATION HAD A GOOD OVER VIEW OF SLAVERY IN NEW<br />

YORK.<br />

8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />

NONE<br />

9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />

I HOPE HE COMES BACK NEXT YEAR.<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

1.<br />

2.<br />

3.<br />

4.<br />

5.<br />

6.<br />

STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />

ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />

EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />

ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />

TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />

QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />

HAVING A SET DESIGNER WAS AN EDUCATIONAL BENEFIT TO<br />

EVERYONE INVOLVED IN THIS PRODUCTION. HE WORKED CLOSELY<br />

WITH THE SET BUILDERS, STUDENT CREW AND DIRECTOR.<br />

8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />

NONE<br />

9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />

NONE<br />

Arts in Education Service - School Evaluations <strong>2011</strong>-<strong>2012</strong><br />

Page 133 of 332


ARTIST: JAMES HOWE<br />

CONTRACT #: A7514<br />

TITLE OF PROGRAM: AUTHOR VISIT<br />

TYPE OF PROGRAM: ASSEMBLY/WORKSHOP<br />

DISTRICT/ SCHOOL: PUTNAM VALLEY/PUTNAM VALLEY ELEM.<br />

# OF TEACHERS: 5<br />

# OF STUDENTS: 150 GRADE(S) 7<br />

DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 1/25/12<br />

NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />

STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />

ARTIST: JAMES LINEHAN<br />

CONTRACT #: A8223<br />

TITLE OF PROGRAM: JIM LINEHAN DANCE TROUPE<br />

TYPE OF PROGRAM: ASSEMBLY<br />

DISTRICT/ SCHOOL: CHAPPAQUA/SEVEN BRIDGES MIDDLE SCHOOL<br />

# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />

# OF STUDENTS: 150 GRADE(S) 7<br />

DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 2/27/12<br />

NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />

STANDARD 1 STANDARD 2 STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4 X<br />

1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />

1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />

1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />

2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />

3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />

4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />

5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />

6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />

7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />

HE IS A BRILLIANT AUTHOR, SPEAKER AND HUMAN BEING.<br />

8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />

NONE<br />

9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />

HE GETS THE STUDENTS TO REALLY THINK.<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />

2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />

3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />

4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />

5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />

6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />

7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />

THE DANCING WAS TERRIFIC, HIGH ENERGY, ENGAGING, AND THE<br />

STORIES WERE SPOT ON RELEVANT AND AGE APPROPRIATE.<br />

8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />

LIP SYNCING DURING PERFORMANCE WAS OBVIOUS AND<br />

UNWARRANTED.<br />

9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />

NOT SURE DISTRIBUTING BUSINESS CARDS WAS APPROPRIATE.<br />

OVERALL THE GROUP DID ENGAGE THE STUDENTS AND GET THEM<br />

ON THEIR FEET TO SING, DANCE AND HOPEFULLY THINK ABOUT<br />

HOW TO TREAT EACH OTHER.<br />

4<br />

4<br />

3<br />

4<br />

3<br />

N/<br />

ARTIST: JAMES LINEHAN<br />

CONTRACT #: A8727<br />

TITLE OF PROGRAM: JIM LINEHAN DANCE TROUPE<br />

TYPE OF PROGRAM: ASSEMBLY<br />

DISTRICT/ SCHOOL: GREENBURGH #7/WOODLANDS MIDDLE SCHOOL<br />

# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />

# OF STUDENTS: 210 GRADE(S) 7 & 8<br />

DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 5/30/12<br />

NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />

STANDARD 1 STANDARD 2 STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4 X<br />

1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />

ARTIST: JAMES OSBORN<br />

CONTRACT #: A8749<br />

TITLE OF PROGRAM: TRUMPET PLAYER FOR THE SHOW - A FUNNY THING<br />

HAPPENED ON THE WAY TO THE FORUM<br />

TYPE OF PROGRAM: ASSEMBLY<br />

DISTRICT/ SCHOOL: PUTNAM VALLEY/PUTNAM VALLEY HIGH SCHOOL<br />

# OF TEACHERS: 3<br />

# OF STUDENTS: 400 GRADE(S) 9-12<br />

DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 4/13-23/12<br />

NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />

STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />

1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />

1.<br />

2.<br />

3.<br />

4.<br />

5.<br />

6.<br />

STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />

ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />

EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />

ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />

TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />

QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

N/<br />

7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />

THIS SHOW IS SO DYNAMIC. THE DANCE FORM VERY<br />

CONTEMPORARY AND COMPELLING. BY THE TIME THE ARTISTS<br />

DEALT WITH BULLYING, THE STUDENTS WERE TOTALLY ENGAGED.<br />

8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />

NONE<br />

9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />

NONE<br />

1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />

2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />

3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />

4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />

5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />

6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />

7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />

NONE<br />

8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />

NONE<br />

9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />

NONE<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

N/<br />

Arts in Education Service - School Evaluations <strong>2011</strong>-<strong>2012</strong><br />

Page 134 of 332


ARTIST: JAMES P. KEYES<br />

CONTRACT #: A7727<br />

TITLE OF PROGRAM: COLONIAL DAY MUSIC<br />

TYPE OF PROGRAM: ASSEMBLY<br />

DISTRICT/ SCHOOL: KATONAH/LEWISBORO/KATONAH ELEM. SCHOOL<br />

# OF TEACHERS: 4<br />

# OF STUDENTS: 84 GRADE(S) 4<br />

DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 5/23/12<br />

NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />

STANDARD 1 STANDARD 2 STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4 X<br />

1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />

ARTIST: JAMES PANZER<br />

CONTRACT #: A8379<br />

TITLE OF PROGRAM: PRODUCTION DESIGNER FOR THE SHOW - GUYS &<br />

DOLLS<br />

TYPE OF PROGRAM: RESIDENCY<br />

DISTRICT/ SCHOOL: KATONAH/LEWISBORO/JOHN JAY HIGH SCHOOL<br />

# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />

# OF STUDENTS: 80 GRADE(S) 9-12<br />

DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 2/10-3/22/12<br />

NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />

STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 X STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />

1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />

1.<br />

2.<br />

3.<br />

4.<br />

5.<br />

6.<br />

STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />

ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />

EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />

ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />

TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />

QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />

STUDENTS WERE ENGAGED, SAW A VARIETY OF COLONIAL<br />

INSTRUMENTS, LEARNED AND PARTICIPATED IN SONGS AND HAD A<br />

WONDERFUL TIME.<br />

8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />

NONE<br />

9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />

FANTASTIC.<br />

1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />

2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />

3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />

4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />

5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />

6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />

7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />

NONE<br />

8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />

NONE<br />

9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />

NONE<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

ARTIST: JAMES PRELLER<br />

CONTRACT #: A7907<br />

TITLE OF PROGRAM: AUTHOR VISIT<br />

TYPE OF PROGRAM: ASSEMBLY<br />

DISTRICT/ SCHOOL: NEW ROCHELLE/DAVIS ELEM. SCHOOL<br />

# OF TEACHERS: 2<br />

# OF STUDENTS: 713 GRADE(S) 1-5<br />

DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 11/3-4/11<br />

NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />

STANDARD 1 STANDARD 2 STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />

ARTIST: JAMES PRELLER<br />

CONTRACT #: A7817<br />

TITLE OF PROGRAM: AUTHOR VISIT<br />

TYPE OF PROGRAM: ASSEMBLY<br />

DISTRICT/ SCHOOL: NEW ROCHELLE/DANIEL WEBSTER ELEM.<br />

# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />

# OF STUDENTS: 500 GRADE(S) K-5<br />

DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 11/2/11<br />

NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />

STANDARD 1 STANDARD 2 STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />

1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />

1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />

1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />

2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />

3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />

4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />

5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />

6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />

7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />

HE SPOKE ABOUT GETTING IDEAS FOR WRITING AND SHARED HIS<br />

PERSONAL EXPERIENCES.<br />

8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />

THE POWER POINT PRESENTATION WAS A GOOD VISUAL. IT WOULD<br />

BE NICE TO SEE PICTURES OF HIS WORK SPACE.<br />

9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />

OVERALL THE PRESENTATION WAS EFFECTIVE.<br />

5<br />

4<br />

4<br />

5<br />

5<br />

Y<br />

1.<br />

2.<br />

3.<br />

4.<br />

5.<br />

6.<br />

STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />

ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />

EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />

ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />

TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />

QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

N/<br />

7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />

HE ENGAGED STUDENTS DURING HIS PRESENTATION. CHILDREN<br />

WERE ENCOURAGE TO KEEP JOURNALS, READ AND WRITE AS<br />

AUTHORS.<br />

8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />

NONE<br />

9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />

MEETING AUTHORS ENABLES CHILDREN TO MAKE REAL LIFE<br />

CONNECTIONS. CHILDREN ARE INSPIRED TO WRITE.<br />

Arts in Education Service - School Evaluations <strong>2011</strong>-<strong>2012</strong><br />

Page 135 of 332


ARTIST: JAMES PRELLER<br />

CONTRACT #: A8521<br />

TITLE OF PROGRAM: AUTHOR VISIT<br />

TYPE OF PROGRAM: ASSEMBLY<br />

DISTRICT/ SCHOOL:<br />

# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />

YORKTOWN/MOHANSIC ELEM.<br />

# OF STUDENTS: 235 GRADE(S) 1 & 2<br />

DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 4/17/12<br />

NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />

STANDARD 1 STANDARD 2 STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />

ARTIST: JAMES PRELLER<br />

CONTRACT #: A8704<br />

TITLE OF PROGRAM: AUTHOR VISIT<br />

TYPE OF PROGRAM: ASSEMBLY<br />

DISTRICT/ SCHOOL:<br />

# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />

YORKTOWN/BROOKSIDE ELEM.<br />

# OF STUDENTS: 117 GRADE(S) 2<br />

DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 4/18/12<br />

NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />

STANDARD 1 STANDARD 2 STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />

1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />

1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />

1.<br />

2.<br />

3.<br />

4.<br />

5.<br />

6.<br />

STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />

ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />

EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />

ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />

TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />

QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />

5<br />

4<br />

5<br />

4<br />

4<br />

4<br />

7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />

STUDENTS WERE HIGHLY ENGAGED IN THE PRESENTATIONS AND<br />

CONTENT WAS APPROPRIATELY ADAPTED FOR GRADE LEVEL.<br />

8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />

NONE<br />

9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />

ARTIST:<br />

NONE<br />

JAMES WALTER KLUZ<br />

CONTRACT #: A7548<br />

TITLE OF PROGRAM: DRUMMING / LEARNING HOW TO BE A DRUMMER<br />

TYPE OF PROGRAM: WORKSHOP<br />

DISTRICT/ SCHOOL:<br />

KATONAH/LEWISBORO/KATONAH ELEM. SCHOOL<br />

# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />

# OF STUDENTS: 7 GRADE(S) 3-5<br />

DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE<br />

9/23-12/16/11<br />

NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />

STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 X STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />

1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />

2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />

3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />

4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />

5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />

6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />

7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />

HE LOVES INTERACTION WITH THE STUDENTS.<br />

5<br />

4<br />

4<br />

5<br />

5<br />

N/<br />

8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />

FOCUS MORE DIRECTLY ON HELPING STUDENTS WITH THE WRITING<br />

PROCESS. HE DID TALK ABOUT IT, BUT MORE ANECDOTALLY.<br />

9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />

HIS STYLE IS VERY LAID BACK. THAT IS A STRENGTH IN THAT HE IS<br />

TALKING TO THE STUDENTS NOT AT THEM. ONE TEACHER DIDN'T<br />

LIKE THAT HE MENTIONED HIS SON'S ILLNESS THE OTHER 4<br />

TEACHERS WERE FINE WITH IT. IT ILLUSTRATED HIS POINT THAT<br />

WE ARE UNIQUE AND OUR WRITING REFLECTS THAT.<br />

ARTIST:<br />

JANE WEINER<br />

TITLE OF PROGRAM: MODERN DANCE<br />

TYPE OF PROGRAM: RESIDENCY<br />

DISTRICT/ SCHOOL:<br />

CONTRACT #: A7863<br />

EASTCHESTER/EASTCHESTER HIGH SCHOOL<br />

# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />

# OF STUDENTS: GRADE(S) 9-12<br />

DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE<br />

12/7-9/11<br />

NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />

STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 X STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4 X<br />

1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />

1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />

1.<br />

2.<br />

3.<br />

4.<br />

5.<br />

6.<br />

STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />

ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />

EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />

ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />

TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />

QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />

4<br />

4<br />

4<br />

4<br />

4<br />

4<br />

7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />

VERY GOOD INSTRUCTOR. WELL LIKED AND EASY TO WORK WITH.<br />

8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />

NONE<br />

9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />

NONE<br />

1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />

2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />

3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />

4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />

5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />

6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />

7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />

NONE<br />

8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />

NONE<br />

9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />

NONE<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

N/<br />

Arts in Education Service - School Evaluations <strong>2011</strong>-<strong>2012</strong><br />

Page 136 of 332


ARTIST: JANET ELMAN dba JANET'S PLANET ART CONTRACT #: A7551B<br />

TITLE OF PROGRAM: ARTFUL OF FUN<br />

TYPE OF PROGRAM: WORKSHOP<br />

DISTRICT/ SCHOOL: KATONAH/LEWISBORO/KATONAH ELEM. SCHOOL<br />

# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />

# OF STUDENTS: 7 GRADE(S) K-2<br />

DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 9/28-11/30/11<br />

NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />

STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 X STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />

ARTIST: JANET ELMAN dba JANET'S PLANET ART CONTRACT #: A8691B<br />

TITLE OF PROGRAM: ARTFUL OF FUN<br />

TYPE OF PROGRAM: WORKSHOP<br />

DISTRICT/ SCHOOL: KATONAH/LEWISBORO/KATONAH ELEM. SCHOOL<br />

# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />

# OF STUDENTS: GRADE(S) K-2<br />

DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 4/11-5/30/12<br />

NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />

STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 X STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />

1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />

1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />

1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />

2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />

3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />

4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />

5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />

6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />

7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />

JANET IS ADORED BY THE STUDENTS. SHE HAS A REGULAR<br />

FOLLOWING AND HAS GREAT CLASSES.<br />

8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />

NONE<br />

9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />

NONE<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

1.<br />

2.<br />

3.<br />

4.<br />

5.<br />

6.<br />

STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />

ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />

EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />

ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />

TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />

QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />

JANET IS CARING ABOUT HER CLASSES AND THE STUDENTS. SHE<br />

IS A PLEASURE TO WORK WITH.<br />

8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />

NONE<br />

9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />

NONE<br />

ARTIST: JANET ELMAN dba JANET'S PLANET ART CONTRACT #: A8285B<br />

TITLE OF PROGRAM: BEADS, BASKETS & MACRAME<br />

TYPE OF PROGRAM: WORKSHOP<br />

DISTRICT/ SCHOOL: KATONAH/LEWISBORO/KATONAH ELEM. SCHOOL<br />

# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />

# OF STUDENTS: 9 GRADE(S) 3-5<br />

DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 1/20-3/16/12<br />

NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />

STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 X STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />

ARTIST: JANET ELMAN dba JANET'S PLANET ART CONTRACT #: A8285A<br />

TITLE OF PROGRAM: JUNK ART (MAKING ART OUT OF RECYCLED ITEMS)<br />

TYPE OF PROGRAM: WORKSHOP<br />

DISTRICT/ SCHOOL: KATONAH/LEWISBORO/KATONAH ELEM. SCHOOL<br />

# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />

# OF STUDENTS: 9 GRADE(S) K-2<br />

DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 1/18-3/14/12<br />

NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />

STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 X STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />

1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />

1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />

1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />

2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />

3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />

4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />

5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />

6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />

7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />

JANET IS AN INVENTIVE ARTIST WHO CARES MUCH ABOUT THE<br />

CHILDREN.<br />

8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />

NONE<br />

9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />

NONE<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

1.<br />

2.<br />

3.<br />

4.<br />

5.<br />

6.<br />

STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />

ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />

EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />

ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />

TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />

QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />

THOUGHTFUL AND IMAGINATIVE TEACHER WHO CARES ABOUT THE<br />

STUDENTS.<br />

8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />

NONE<br />

9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />

NONE<br />

Arts in Education Service - School Evaluations <strong>2011</strong>-<strong>2012</strong><br />

Page 137 of 332


ARTIST: JANET FRANCO<br />

CONTRACT #: A8571<br />

TITLE OF PROGRAM: DANCING THE CLASSICS<br />

TYPE OF PROGRAM: WORKSHOP<br />

DISTRICT/ SCHOOL:<br />

# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />

CHAPPAQUA/GRAFFLIN ELEM.<br />

# OF STUDENTS: GRADE(S) K<br />

DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 2/17-5/25/12<br />

NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />

STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4 X<br />

ARTIST: JANET L. REYNOLDS dba JAN REYNOLD<br />

CONTRACT #: A8488<br />

TITLE OF PROGRAM: AUTHOR VISIT - VANISHING CULTURES<br />

TYPE OF PROGRAM: ASSEMBLY<br />

DISTRICT/ SCHOOL:<br />

# OF TEACHERS: 4<br />

NORTH SALEM/PQ ELEM.<br />

# OF STUDENTS: 100 GRADE(S) 5<br />

DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 3/5/12<br />

NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />

STANDARD 1 STANDARD 2 STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4 X<br />

1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />

1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />

1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />

2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />

3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />

4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />

5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />

6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />

5<br />

5<br />

4<br />

5<br />

5<br />

N/<br />

1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />

2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />

3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />

4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />

5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />

6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />

JANET PRESENTS A LOVELY, EDUCATIONAL AND APPROPRIATE<br />

DANCE PROGRAM THAT WAS ALSO LOTS OF FUN.<br />

8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />

NONE<br />

9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />

NONE<br />

7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y<br />

JAN IS SUCH AN ENERGETIC INSPIRING ROLE MODEL.<br />

8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />

NONE<br />

9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />

STUDENTS ENJOYED PRESENTATION AND LEARNED A LOT.<br />

WHY?<br />

ARTIST: JANET L. REYNOLDS dba JAN REYNOLD<br />

CONTRACT #: A8396<br />

TITLE OF PROGRAM: VANISHING CULTURES<br />

TYPE OF PROGRAM: ASSEMBLY<br />

DISTRICT/ SCHOOL:<br />

# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />

ARDSLEY/CONCORD ROAD ELEM.<br />

# OF STUDENTS: 155 GRADE(S) 3<br />

DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 5/16/12<br />

NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />

STANDARD 1 STANDARD 2 STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4 X<br />

ARTIST: JANICE BUCKNER<br />

CONTRACT #: A8619<br />

TITLE OF PROGRAM: SONGS OF THE DIFFERENTLY ABLED<br />

TYPE OF PROGRAM: ASSEMBLY<br />

DISTRICT/ SCHOOL: LAKELAND/BENJAMIN FRANKLIN ELEM.<br />

# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />

# OF STUDENTS: 92 GRADE(S) K<br />

DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 3/13/12<br />

NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />

STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />

1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />

1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />

1.<br />

2.<br />

3.<br />

4.<br />

5.<br />

6.<br />

STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />

ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />

EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />

ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />

TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />

QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />

JAN'S VISIT IS A HIGHLIGHT OF OUR SCHOOL YEAR. SHE<br />

CONNECTS CULTURES FROM AROUND THE WORLD. THEY LEARN<br />

SO MUCH FROM HER.<br />

8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />

NONE<br />

9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />

HER PRESENTATION IS FANTASTIC. SHE IS AN INSPIRING AND<br />

WONDERFUL INDIVIDUAL.<br />

1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />

2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />

3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />

4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />

5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />

6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />

7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />

THIS PROGRAM WAS ENGAGING, FUN AND CONNECTED TO OUR<br />

CURRICULUM. WE WERE THRILLED WITH THE PRESENTATION.<br />

8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />

NONE<br />

9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />

NONE<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

Arts in Education Service - School Evaluations <strong>2011</strong>-<strong>2012</strong><br />

Page 138 of 332


ARTIST: JANICE NOTO HELMERS<br />

CONTRACT #: A8115D<br />

TITLE OF PROGRAM: FAIRY WORLD CRAFTS<br />

TYPE OF PROGRAM: WORKSHOP<br />

DISTRICT/ SCHOOL: CHAPPAQUA/WESTORCHARD ELEM.<br />

# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />

# OF STUDENTS: 8 GRADE(S) K-2<br />

DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 1/9-3/8/12<br />

NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />

STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 X STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />

ARTIST: JANINE SOLANO<br />

CONTRACT #: A8082<br />

TITLE OF PROGRAM: CHOREOGRAPHER OF THE SENIOR REVUE<br />

TYPE OF PROGRAM: RESIDENCY<br />

DISTRICT/ SCHOOL:<br />

# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />

ARDSLEY/ARDSLEY HIGH SCHOOL<br />

# OF STUDENTS: 70 GRADE(S) 12<br />

DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 12/1/11-1/21/12<br />

NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />

STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 X STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />

1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />

1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />

1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />

2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />

3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />

4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />

5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />

6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />

7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />

NONE<br />

8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />

NONE<br />

9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />

LOVELY INSTRUCTOR.<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

N/<br />

1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />

2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />

3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />

4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />

5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />

6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />

7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />

THE SHOW WAS A HIT AND HER DIRECTION WAS EXCELLENT.<br />

8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />

NONE<br />

9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />

HER SKILLS, INSIGHT AND ABILITY TO COMMUNICATE WITH THE<br />

STUDENTS IS A BLESSING. SHE IS IN TOUCH WITH THE CULTURAL<br />

EXPECTATIONS OF NOT ONLY OUR COMMUNITY, BUT MORE<br />

IMPORTANTLY THE STUDENTS.<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

N/<br />

ARTIST: JEAN L. HEINSOHN<br />

CONTRACT #: A8177<br />

TITLE OF PROGRAM: SET DESIGNER FOR THE SHOW - ANNIE GET YOUR<br />

GUN<br />

TYPE OF PROGRAM: RESIDENCY<br />

DISTRICT/ SCHOOL:<br />

# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />

TUCKAHOE/TUCKAHOE MS & HS<br />

# OF STUDENTS: GRADE(S) 6-12<br />

DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 1/10-3/19/12<br />

NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />

STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 X STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />

1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />

ARTIST: JEFFREY KANE<br />

CONTRACT #: A8577<br />

TITLE OF PROGRAM: DRUMMER FOR THE SHOW - SUGAR<br />

TYPE OF PROGRAM: ASSEMBLY<br />

DISTRICT/ SCHOOL: BRIARCLIFF/BRIARCLIFF HIGH SCHOOL<br />

# OF TEACHERS: 2<br />

# OF STUDENTS: GRADE(S) 9-12<br />

DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 4/4-11/12<br />

NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />

STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />

1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />

1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />

2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />

3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />

4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />

5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />

6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />

7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />

HEATHER WORKED WELL WITH OTHER STAFF AND WITH THE<br />

CHILDREN.<br />

8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />

NONE<br />

9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />

NONE<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />

2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />

3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />

4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />

5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />

6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />

7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />

NONE<br />

8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />

NONE<br />

9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />

NONE<br />

5<br />

4<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

Arts in Education Service - School Evaluations <strong>2011</strong>-<strong>2012</strong><br />

Page 139 of 332


ARTIST: JENNIFER BREEN<br />

CONTRACT #: A8369A<br />

TITLE OF PROGRAM: ART & CULTURE OF YOGA I<br />

TYPE OF PROGRAM: WORKSHOP<br />

DISTRICT/ SCHOOL:<br />

# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />

PELHAM/HUTCHINSON ELEM.<br />

# OF STUDENTS: 14 GRADE(S) K-2<br />

DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 2/3-3/30/12<br />

NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />

STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 X STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4 X<br />

ARTIST: JENNIFER BREEN<br />

CONTRACT #: A8369B<br />

TITLE OF PROGRAM: ART & CULTURE OF YOGA II<br />

TYPE OF PROGRAM: WORKSHOP<br />

DISTRICT/ SCHOOL:<br />

# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />

PELHAM/HUTCHINSON ELEM.<br />

# OF STUDENTS: 14 GRADE(S) 3-5<br />

DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 2/14-4/3/12<br />

NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />

STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 X STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4 X<br />

1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />

1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />

1.<br />

2.<br />

3.<br />

4.<br />

5.<br />

6.<br />

STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />

ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />

EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />

ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />

TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />

QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />

SHE IS A PLEASURE TO WORK WITH AND THE STUDENTS RESPOND<br />

VERY WELL TO HER.<br />

8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />

NONE<br />

9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />

NONE<br />

1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />

2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />

3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />

4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />

5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />

6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />

7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />

THE STUDENTS LOVE ARE AND MOVEMENT OF YOGA. GREAT<br />

CLASS TO HELP THEM GET EXTRA ENERGY AT MID DAY.<br />

8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />

NONE<br />

9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />

NONE<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

ARTIST: JENNINGS MICHAEL BURCH<br />

CONTRACT #: A7909<br />

TITLE OF PROGRAM: AUTHOR VISIT - THEY CAGETHE ANIMALS AT NIGHT<br />

TYPE OF PROGRAM: ASSEMBLY<br />

DISTRICT/ SCHOOL: CARMEL/GEORGE FISCHER MIDDLE SCHOOL<br />

# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />

# OF STUDENTS: 360 GRADE(S) 8<br />

DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 11/2/11<br />

NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />

STANDARD 1 STANDARD 2 STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />

ARTIST: JENNINGS MICHAEL BURCH<br />

CONTRACT #: A8872<br />

TITLE OF PROGRAM: AUTHOR VISIT - THEY CAGETHE ANIMALS AT NIGHT<br />

TYPE OF PROGRAM: ASSEMBLY<br />

DISTRICT/ SCHOOL: DOBBS FERRY/DOBBS FERRY MIDDLE SCHOOL<br />

# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />

# OF STUDENTS: GRADE(S) 7<br />

DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 6/4/12<br />

NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />

STANDARD 1 STANDARD 2 STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />

1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />

1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />

1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />

2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />

3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />

4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />

5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />

6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />

2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />

3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />

4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />

5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />

6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM?<br />

NONE<br />

8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />

NONE<br />

9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />

NONE<br />

Y<br />

WHY?<br />

7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />

AMAZING TO HEAR FIRST HAND THAT LIFE STORIES THAT MADE<br />

HIM CREATE THE BOOK.<br />

8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />

NONE<br />

9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />

NONE<br />

Arts in Education Service - School Evaluations <strong>2011</strong>-<strong>2012</strong><br />

Page 140 of 332


ARTIST: JENNINGS MICHAEL BURCH<br />

CONTRACT #: A8874<br />

TITLE OF PROGRAM: AUTHOR VISIT - THEY CAGETHE ANIMALS AT NIGHT<br />

TYPE OF PROGRAM: ASSEMBLY<br />

DISTRICT/ SCHOOL: OSSINING/ANNE DORNER MIDDLE SCHOOL<br />

# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />

# OF STUDENTS: 150 GRADE(S) 6<br />

DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 6/1/12<br />

NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />

STANDARD 1 STANDARD 2 STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />

ARTIST: JENQ-ING KUO<br />

CONTRACT #: A8198<br />

TITLE OF PROGRAM: CHINESE CULTURE - ORIGAMI<br />

TYPE OF PROGRAM: WORKSHOP<br />

DISTRICT/ SCHOOL: CHAPPAQUA/ROARING BROOK ELEM.<br />

# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />

# OF STUDENTS: 8 GRADE(S) 1-3<br />

DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 1/9-3/5/12<br />

NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />

STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 X STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4 X<br />

1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />

1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />

1.<br />

2.<br />

3.<br />

4.<br />

5.<br />

6.<br />

STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />

ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />

EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />

ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />

TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />

QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />

JENNINGS DESCRIBES WHAT LED TO HIS WRITING OF "THEY CAGE<br />

THE ANIMALS AT NIGHT" AND INSPIRES STUDENTS TO TELL THEIR<br />

STORIES.<br />

8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />

NONE<br />

9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />

NONE<br />

1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />

2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />

3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />

4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />

5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />

6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />

7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />

A STUDENTS LOVE JENQ EXPECIALLY HER CHINESE NEW YEAR<br />

DRAGON.<br />

8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />

NONE<br />

9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />

NONE<br />

5<br />

5<br />

4<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

ARTIST: JEREMY DeLUCA<br />

CONTRACT #: A7681<br />

TITLE OF PROGRAM: SET DESIGNER FOR THE FALL SHOW<br />

TYPE OF PROGRAM: RESIDENCY<br />

DISTRICT/ SCHOOL: KATONAH/LEWISBORO/JOHN JAY HIGH SCHOOL<br />

# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />

# OF STUDENTS: 400 GRADE(S) 9-12<br />

DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 10/17-11/24/11<br />

NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />

STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 X STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />

ARTIST: JEREMY DeLUCA<br />

CONTRACT #: A8310<br />

TITLE OF PROGRAM: SET DESIGNER FOR THE SHOW - GUYS & DOLLS<br />

TYPE OF PROGRAM: RESIDENCY<br />

DISTRICT/ SCHOOL: KATONAH/LEWISBORO/JOHN JAY HIGH SCHOOL<br />

# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />

# OF STUDENTS: 85 GRADE(S) 9-12<br />

DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 2/1-3/22/12<br />

NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />

STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 X STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />

1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />

1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />

1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />

2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />

3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />

4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />

5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />

6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />

2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />

3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />

4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />

5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />

6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM?<br />

NONE<br />

Y<br />

WHY?<br />

7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM?<br />

NONE<br />

Y<br />

WHY?<br />

8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />

NONE<br />

9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />

NONE<br />

8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />

NONE<br />

9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />

NONE<br />

Arts in Education Service - School Evaluations <strong>2011</strong>-<strong>2012</strong><br />

Page 141 of 332


ARTIST: JESSE WEISS<br />

CONTRACT #: A8567<br />

TITLE OF PROGRAM: SOUND DESIGNER FOR THE SHOW - THE DROWSY<br />

CHAPERONE<br />

TYPE OF PROGRAM: RESIDENCY<br />

DISTRICT/ SCHOOL: KATONAH/LEWISBORO/JOHN JAY MIDDLE SCHOOL<br />

# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />

# OF STUDENTS: 75 GRADE(S) 6-8<br />

DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 3/12-17/12<br />

NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />

STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 X STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />

ARTIST: JESSICA L. ATKINSON<br />

CONTRACT #: A8438<br />

TITLE OF PROGRAM: SET DESIGNER FOR THE SHOW - A FUNNY THING<br />

HAPPENED ON THE WAY TO THE FORUM<br />

TYPE OF PROGRAM: RESIDENCY<br />

DISTRICT/ SCHOOL: PUTNAM VALLEY/PUTNAM VALLEY HIGH SCHOOL<br />

# OF TEACHERS: 3<br />

# OF STUDENTS: 400 GRADE(S) 9-12<br />

DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 11/1-12/5/11<br />

NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />

STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 X STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />

1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />

1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />

1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />

2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />

3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />

4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />

5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />

6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />

2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />

3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />

4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />

5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />

6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM?<br />

GOOD JOB.<br />

Y<br />

WHY?<br />

7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM?<br />

NONE<br />

Y<br />

WHY?<br />

8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />

NONE<br />

9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />

NONE<br />

8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />

NONE<br />

9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />

NONE<br />

ARTIST: JESSICA MALONE ATKINSON<br />

CONTRACT #: A7781<br />

TITLE OF PROGRAM: SET DESIGNER FOR THE SHOW - DRACULA<br />

TYPE OF PROGRAM: RESIDENCY<br />

DISTRICT/ SCHOOL: PUTNAM VALLEY/PUTNAM VALLEY HIGH SCHOOL<br />

# OF TEACHERS: 2<br />

# OF STUDENTS: 50 GRADE(S) 9-12<br />

DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 11/1-12/5/11<br />

NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />

STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 X STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />

ARTIST: JOAN BAUER<br />

CONTRACT #: A7792<br />

TITLE OF PROGRAM: AUTHOR VISIT<br />

TYPE OF PROGRAM: ASSEMBLY<br />

DISTRICT/ SCHOOL: YORKTOWN/MILDRED STRANG MIDDLE SCHOOL<br />

# OF TEACHERS: 5<br />

# OF STUDENTS: 320 GRADE(S) 8<br />

DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 10/11/11<br />

NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />

STANDARD 1 STANDARD 2 STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />

1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />

1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />

1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />

2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />

3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />

4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />

5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />

6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />

7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />

NONE<br />

8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />

NONE<br />

9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />

NONE<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

1.<br />

2.<br />

3.<br />

4.<br />

5.<br />

6.<br />

STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />

ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />

EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />

ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />

TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />

QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

N/<br />

7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />

JOAN WAS HIGHLY ENERGETIC, ENTHUSIASTIC AND ENGAGING.<br />

SHE LED A HIGHLY INTERACTIVE PROGRAM THAT HELPED THE<br />

STUDENTS IDENTIFY WITH THE WRITING PROCESS. SHE WAS ABLE<br />

TO PERSONALIZE EACH PRESENTATION TO THE AUDIENCE<br />

INTERESTS AND RESPONSES.<br />

8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />

NONE<br />

9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />

WE WILL GLADLY WELCOME HER BACK NEXT YEAR.<br />

Arts in Education Service - School Evaluations <strong>2011</strong>-<strong>2012</strong><br />

Page 142 of 332


ARTIST: JOAN BRISSON<br />

CONTRACT #: A8360<br />

TITLE OF PROGRAM: HARRY POTTER - WIZARD CRAFTS<br />

TYPE OF PROGRAM: WORKSHOP<br />

DISTRICT/ SCHOOL:<br />

# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />

PELHAM/SIWANOY ELEM.<br />

# OF STUDENTS: 8 GRADE(S) 4 & 5<br />

DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 2/1-4/4/12<br />

NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />

STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 X STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />

ARTIST: JOAN BRISSON<br />

CONTRACT #: A7643<br />

TITLE OF PROGRAM: HARRY POTTER - WIZARD CRAFTS<br />

TYPE OF PROGRAM: WORKSHOP<br />

DISTRICT/ SCHOOL:<br />

# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />

PELHAM/SIWANOY ELEM.<br />

# OF STUDENTS: 13 GRADE(S) 3 & 4<br />

DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 10/5-11/30/11<br />

NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />

STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 X STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />

1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />

1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />

1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />

2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />

3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />

4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />

5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />

6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />

2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />

3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />

4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />

5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />

6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM?<br />

NONE<br />

Y<br />

WHY?<br />

7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM?<br />

NONE<br />

Y<br />

WHY?<br />

8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />

NONE<br />

9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />

NONE<br />

8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />

NONE<br />

9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />

NONE<br />

ARTIST: JOANN PEPPARD<br />

CONTRACT #: A8442<br />

TITLE OF PROGRAM: CO-PRODUCTION MANAGER FOR THE SHOW - A<br />

FUNNY THING HAPPENED ON THE WAY TO THE<br />

FORUM<br />

TYPE OF PROGRAM: RESIDENCY<br />

DISTRICT/ SCHOOL:<br />

PUTNAM VALLEY/PUTNAM VALLEY HIGH SCHOOL<br />

# OF TEACHERS: 3<br />

# OF STUDENTS: 400 GRADE(S) 9-12<br />

DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE<br />

3/3-4/23/12<br />

NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />

STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 X STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />

1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />

ARTIST: JOANN PEPPARD<br />

CONTRACT #: A7778<br />

TITLE OF PROGRAM: CO-PRODUCTION MANAGER FOR THE SHOW -<br />

DRACULA<br />

TYPE OF PROGRAM: RESIDENCY<br />

DISTRICT/ SCHOOL: PUTNAM VALLEY/PUTNAM VALLEY HIGH SCHOOL<br />

# OF TEACHERS: 2<br />

# OF STUDENTS: 50 GRADE(S) 9-12<br />

DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 11/1-12/5/11<br />

NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />

STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 X STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />

1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />

1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />

2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />

3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />

4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />

5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />

6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />

7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />

NONE<br />

8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />

NONE<br />

9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />

NONE<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />

2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />

3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />

4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />

5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />

6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />

7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />

NONE<br />

8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />

NONE<br />

9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />

NONE<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

Arts in Education Service - School Evaluations <strong>2011</strong>-<strong>2012</strong><br />

Page 143 of 332


ARTIST: JOCELYN KRAUS<br />

CONTRACT #: A8647<br />

TITLE OF PROGRAM: FLUTE PLAYER FOR THE SHOW - A FUNNY THING<br />

HAPPENED ON THE WAY TO THE FORUM<br />

TYPE OF PROGRAM: ASSEMBLY<br />

DISTRICT/ SCHOOL: PUTNAM VALLEY/PUTNAM VALLEY HIGH SCHOOL<br />

# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />

# OF STUDENTS: 400 GRADE(S) 9-12<br />

DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 4/13-23/12<br />

NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />

STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />

1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />

ARTIST: JOHANNA CARMINOCCI<br />

CONTRACT #: A8743A<br />

TITLE OF PROGRAM: CARTOONING<br />

TYPE OF PROGRAM: WORKSHOP<br />

DISTRICT/ SCHOOL:<br />

# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />

NORTH SALEM/PQ ELEM.<br />

# OF STUDENTS: 8 GRADE(S) 4 & 5<br />

DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 4/18-6/6/12<br />

NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />

STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 X STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />

1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />

1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />

2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />

3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />

4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />

5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />

6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />

7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />

NONE<br />

8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />

NONE<br />

9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />

NONE<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />

2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />

3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />

4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />

5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />

6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />

7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />

NONE<br />

8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />

NONE<br />

9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />

NONE<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

ARTIST: JOHANNA CARMINOCCI<br />

CONTRACT #: A8267<br />

TITLE OF PROGRAM: DESIGNING & CREATING A NEWSPAPER<br />

TYPE OF PROGRAM: WORKSHOP<br />

DISTRICT/ SCHOOL:<br />

# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />

NORTH SALEM/PQ ELEM.<br />

# OF STUDENTS: 23 GRADE(S) 4 & 5<br />

DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 1/256-3/29/12<br />

NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />

STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 X STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />

ARTIST: JOHANNA CARMINOCCI<br />

CONTRACT #: A7629<br />

TITLE OF PROGRAM: DESIGNING & CREATING A NEWSPAPER<br />

TYPE OF PROGRAM: WORKSHOP<br />

DISTRICT/ SCHOOL:<br />

# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />

NORTH SALEM/PQ ELEM.<br />

# OF STUDENTS: 19 GRADE(S) 4 & 5<br />

DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 10/6-12/15/11<br />

NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />

STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 X STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />

1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />

1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />

1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />

2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />

3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />

4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />

5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />

6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />

2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />

3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />

4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />

5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />

6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM?<br />

NONE<br />

Y<br />

WHY?<br />

7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM?<br />

NONE<br />

Y<br />

WHY?<br />

8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />

NONE<br />

9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />

NONE<br />

8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />

NONE<br />

9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />

NONE<br />

Arts in Education Service - School Evaluations <strong>2011</strong>-<strong>2012</strong><br />

Page 144 of 332


ARTIST: JOHANNA CARMINOCCI<br />

CONTRACT #: A8743B<br />

TITLE OF PROGRAM: DESIGNING & CREATING A NEWSPAPER<br />

TYPE OF PROGRAM: WORKSHOP<br />

DISTRICT/ SCHOOL:<br />

# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />

NORTH SALEM/PQ ELEM.<br />

# OF STUDENTS: 23 GRADE(S) 4 & 5<br />

DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 4/19-6/7/12<br />

NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />

STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 X STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />

ARTIST: JOHN (CHRIS) ROWLANDS<br />

CONTRACT #: A8072AB<br />

TITLE OF PROGRAM: OCEAN CONCERT & FARMING LIFE CONCERT<br />

TYPE OF PROGRAM: ASSEMBLY/WORKSHOP<br />

DISTRICT/ SCHOOL: KATONAH/LEWISBORO/KATONAH ELEM. SCHOOL<br />

# OF TEACHERS: 8<br />

# OF STUDENTS: 140 GRADE(S) 5 & K<br />

DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 5/21/12<br />

NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />

STANDARD 1 STANDARD 2 STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />

1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />

1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />

1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />

2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />

3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />

4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />

5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />

6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />

7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />

NONE<br />

8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />

NONE<br />

9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />

NONE<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

1.<br />

2.<br />

3.<br />

4.<br />

5.<br />

6.<br />

STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />

ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />

EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />

ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />

TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />

QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />

CHRIS IS OUTSTANDING. PROGRAM WAS INFORMATIVE, CREATIVE<br />

AND FUN.<br />

8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />

NONE<br />

9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />

NONE<br />

ARTIST: JOHN (CHRIS) ROWLANDS<br />

CONTRACT #: A8796<br />

TITLE OF PROGRAM: OCEAN SAFARI CONCERT<br />

TYPE OF PROGRAM: ASSEMBLY<br />

DISTRICT/ SCHOOL: PLEASANTVILLE/BEDFORD ROAD ELEM.<br />

# OF TEACHERS: 2<br />

# OF STUDENTS: 125 GRADE(S) 1<br />

DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 4/22/12<br />

NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />

STANDARD 1 STANDARD 2 STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />

ARTIST: JOHN (CHRIS) ROWLANDS<br />

CONTRACT #: A8594<br />

TITLE OF PROGRAM: SONGWRITING RESIDENCY<br />

TYPE OF PROGRAM: RESIDENCY<br />

DISTRICT/ SCHOOL:<br />

# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />

CARMEL/PATERSON ELEM.<br />

# OF STUDENTS: GRADE(S) 4<br />

DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 4/30-5/4/12<br />

NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />

STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 X STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />

1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />

1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />

1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />

2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />

3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />

4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />

5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />

6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />

2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />

3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />

4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />

5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />

6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

N/<br />

7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM?<br />

VERY ENTERTAINING AND EDUCATIONAL.<br />

8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />

NONE<br />

9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />

WE LOVED CHRIS.<br />

Y<br />

WHY?<br />

7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />

CHRIS IS AN AMAZING TEACHER. HE IS FUN BUT ALSO ABLE TO<br />

MAINTAIN STUDENT COOPERATION AND PRIDE.<br />

8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />

NONE<br />

9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />

YOU WILL LOVE WORKING WITH HIM.<br />

Arts in Education Service - School Evaluations <strong>2011</strong>-<strong>2012</strong><br />

Page 145 of 332


ARTIST: JOHN BOWEN<br />

CONTRACT #: A8579<br />

TITLE OF PROGRAM: PIANIST FOR THE SHOW - SUGAR<br />

TYPE OF PROGRAM: ASSEMBLY<br />

DISTRICT/ SCHOOL: BRIARCLIFF/BRIARCLIFF HIGH SCHOOL<br />

# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />

# OF STUDENTS: 70 GRADE(S) 9-12<br />

DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 3/4-11/12<br />

NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />

STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />

1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />

ARTIST: JOHN C. FREYER<br />

CONTRACT #: A8338<br />

TITLE OF PROGRAM: PRODUCTION DESIGNER FOR THE SHOW - GUYS &<br />

DOLLS<br />

TYPE OF PROGRAM: RESIDENCY<br />

DISTRICT/ SCHOOL: KATONAH/LEWISBORO/JOHN JAY HIGH SCHOOL<br />

# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />

# OF STUDENTS: 150 GRADE(S) 9-12<br />

DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 2/1-3/22/12<br />

NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />

STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 X STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />

1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />

1.<br />

2.<br />

3.<br />

4.<br />

5.<br />

6.<br />

STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />

ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />

EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />

ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />

TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />

QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

N/<br />

7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />

THE INTERACTION BETWEEN PROFESSIONAL AND STUDENT WAS<br />

INVALUABLE.<br />

8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />

MORE REHEARSAL TIME.<br />

9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />

NONE<br />

1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />

2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />

3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />

4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />

5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />

6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />

7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />

NONE<br />

8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />

NONE<br />

9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />

NONE<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

ARTIST: JOHN C. MAIER<br />

CONTRACT #: A8206<br />

TITLE OF PROGRAM: INTRO TO GUITAR<br />

TYPE OF PROGRAM: WORKSHOP<br />

DISTRICT/ SCHOOL: CHAPPAQUA/ROARING BROOK ELEM.<br />

# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />

# OF STUDENTS: 8 GRADE(S) 3 & 4<br />

DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 1/13-3/9/12<br />

NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />

STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 X STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />

ARTIST: JOHN DAVID JOHNSON<br />

CONTRACT #: A8786<br />

TITLE OF PROGRAM: POETRY - THE LANGUAGE OF MUSIC<br />

TYPE OF PROGRAM: WORKSHOP<br />

DISTRICT/ SCHOOL:<br />

# OF TEACHERS: 4<br />

TUCKAHOE/TUCKAHOE MS & HS<br />

# OF STUDENTS: GRADE(S) 6-12<br />

DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 5/9/12<br />

NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />

STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 X STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />

1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />

1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />

1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />

2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />

3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />

4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />

5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />

6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />

7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />

JOHN WAS VERY LATE FOR THE FIRST CLASS.<br />

8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />

NONE<br />

9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />

JOHN IS VERY IRRESPONSIBLE WITH PAPERWORK.<br />

4<br />

4<br />

4<br />

4<br />

2<br />

4<br />

1.<br />

2.<br />

3.<br />

4.<br />

5.<br />

6.<br />

STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />

ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />

EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />

ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />

TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />

QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />

THE ABILITY TO MODIFY THE PROGRAM QUICKLY FOR VAIOUS AGE<br />

GROUPS WAS IMPORTANT.<br />

8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />

NONE<br />

9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />

THE MATERIALS WERE RELEVANT TO OUR SOCIAL TIMES AND LIFE<br />

EXPERIENCE.<br />

Arts in Education Service - School Evaluations <strong>2011</strong>-<strong>2012</strong><br />

Page 146 of 332


ARTIST: JOHN FARRELL<br />

CONTRACT #: A8771<br />

TITLE OF PROGRAM: CHARACTER ED BULLYING CONCERTS<br />

TYPE OF PROGRAM: ASSEMBLY<br />

DISTRICT/ SCHOOL: KATONAH/LEWISBORO/ALL ELEM SCHOOLS<br />

# OF TEACHERS: 4<br />

# OF STUDENTS: 1800 GRADE(S) K-5<br />

DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 4/16-23/12<br />

NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />

STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />

ARTIST: JOHN FARRELL<br />

CONTRACT #: A8597<br />

TITLE OF PROGRAM: LET'S TREAT EACH OTHER BETTER<br />

TYPE OF PROGRAM: ASSEMBLY<br />

DISTRICT/ SCHOOL: TARRYTOWN/JOHN PAULDING ELEM.<br />

# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />

# OF STUDENTS: 332 GRADE(S) PRE K &<br />

DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 3/2/12<br />

NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />

STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />

1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />

1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />

1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />

2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />

3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />

4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />

5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />

6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />

2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />

3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />

4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />

5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />

6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

N/<br />

7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />

IT IS TRULY A CHARACTER ED SHOW THAT BUILDS RESILIENCE<br />

AND A SENSE OF COMMUNITY WITH CREATIVE SONGS, MUSIC,<br />

STORIES AND DANCE.<br />

8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />

NONE<br />

9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />

WE WILL INVITE THEM BACK.<br />

7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM?<br />

NONE<br />

8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />

JOHN JUST KEEPS GETTING BETTER.<br />

9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />

WAITING FOR A NEW CD.<br />

Y<br />

WHY?<br />

ARTIST: JOHN FARRELL<br />

CONTRACT #: A8465<br />

TITLE OF PROGRAM: SONGS ABOUT EMPATHY<br />

TYPE OF PROGRAM: ASSEMBLY<br />

DISTRICT/ SCHOOL:<br />

# OF TEACHERS: 3<br />

NORTH SALEM/PQ ELEM.<br />

# OF STUDENTS: GRADE(S) K-5<br />

DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 2/27/12<br />

NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />

STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />

ARTIST: JOHN GRADY dba J. D. CONSULTING CONTRACT #: A8877<br />

TITLE OF PROGRAM: DRUM CIRCLE - MUSIC & DANCE<br />

TYPE OF PROGRAM: WORKSHOP<br />

DISTRICT/ SCHOOL:<br />

# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />

PELHAM/COLONIAL ELEM.<br />

# OF STUDENTS: 110 GRADE(S) K & 1<br />

DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 6/6-8/12<br />

NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />

STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 X STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4 X<br />

1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />

1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />

1.<br />

2.<br />

3.<br />

4.<br />

5.<br />

6.<br />

STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />

ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />

EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />

ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />

TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />

QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

N/<br />

7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />

JOHN IS ENTERTAINING, EDUCATIONAL AND PROFESSIONAL. THE<br />

CHILDREN WERE VISIBLY MOVED AND TOUCHED BY JOHN'S SONGS<br />

AND STORIES.<br />

8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />

NONE<br />

9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />

GREAT ASSEMBLY FOR ANTI-BULLYING AND CHARACTER<br />

BUILDING.<br />

1.<br />

2.<br />

3.<br />

4.<br />

5.<br />

6.<br />

STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />

ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />

EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />

ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />

TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />

QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />

THE WORKSHOP WAS ENGAGING AND EXCITING FOR ALL. IT WAS<br />

ALSO GREAT EXPOSURE TO AFRICAN HISTORY.<br />

8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />

NONE<br />

9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />

THE CHILDREN WERE ENGAGED THROUGHOUT AND LOVED THE<br />

PROGRAM.<br />

Arts in Education Service - School Evaluations <strong>2011</strong>-<strong>2012</strong><br />

Page 147 of 332


ARTIST: JOHN W. BOWEN<br />

CONTRACT #: A8112<br />

TITLE OF PROGRAM: MUSICAL DIRECTOR FOR THE SHOW - SEUSSICAL<br />

TYPE OF PROGRAM: RESIDENCY<br />

DISTRICT/ SCHOOL: CHAPPAQUA/SEVEN BRIDGES MIDDLE SCHOOL<br />

# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />

# OF STUDENTS: 103 GRADE(S) 5-8<br />

DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 12/15/11-2/13/12<br />

NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />

STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 X STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />

ARTIST: JONATHAN DELMAN dba JONATHAN BL CONTRACT #: A7509<br />

TITLE OF PROGRAM: PERFORMING MAGIC<br />

TYPE OF PROGRAM: WORKSHOP<br />

DISTRICT/ SCHOOL: KATONAH/LEWISBORO/INCREASE MILLER ELEM.<br />

# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />

# OF STUDENTS: 7 GRADE(S) 1-3<br />

DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 10/6-12/1/11<br />

NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />

STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 X STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />

1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />

1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />

1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />

2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />

3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />

4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />

5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />

6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />

2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />

3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />

4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />

5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />

6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />

JOHN WORKED MUSICAL MAGIC WITH A WIDE AND DIVERSELY<br />

TALENTED GROUP OF STUDENTS.<br />

8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />

NONE<br />

9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />

NONE<br />

7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />

JONATHAN'S CLASSES ALWAYS DELIGHT THE STUDENTS.<br />

PARENTS TELL ME THAT THEIR CHILDREN CONTINUE THE<br />

PERFORMANCE AT HOME.<br />

8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />

NONE<br />

9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />

NONE<br />

ARTIST: JONATHAN DELMAN dba JONATHAN BL CONTRACT #: A8230<br />

TITLE OF PROGRAM: PERFORMING MAGIC<br />

TYPE OF PROGRAM: WORKSHOP<br />

DISTRICT/ SCHOOL: KATONAH/LEWISBORO/INCREASE MILLER ELEM.<br />

# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />

# OF STUDENTS: 9 GRADE(S) 1-3<br />

DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 1/23-3/19/12<br />

NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />

STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 X STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />

ARTIST: JONATHAN FLAKS COACHING ASSOC., I<br />

CONTRACT #: A8598<br />

TITLE OF PROGRAM: ELLEN FLAKS - CREATIVE DRAMA<br />

TYPE OF PROGRAM: RESIDENCY<br />

DISTRICT/ SCHOOL: EASTCHESTER/ANNE HUTCHINSON ELEM.<br />

# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />

# OF STUDENTS: GRADE(S) 2 & 3<br />

DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 3/5-5/14/12<br />

NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />

STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />

1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />

1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />

1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />

2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />

3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />

4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />

5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />

6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />

2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />

3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />

4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />

5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />

6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />

4<br />

4<br />

4<br />

4<br />

4<br />

4<br />

7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />

HE BROUGHT HIS BIRDS INTO CLASS AND MADE BALLOON<br />

ANIMALS. WHAT FUN.<br />

8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />

NONE<br />

9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />

NONE<br />

7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM?<br />

VERY INVOLVED WITH CHILDREN.<br />

8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />

NONE<br />

9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />

NONE<br />

Y<br />

WHY?<br />

Arts in Education Service - School Evaluations <strong>2011</strong>-<strong>2012</strong><br />

Page 148 of 332


ARTIST: JONATHAN FLAKS COACHING ASSOC., I CONTRACT #: A7615A<br />

TITLE OF PROGRAM: ELLEN FLAKS - CREATIVE DRAMA<br />

TYPE OF PROGRAM: WORKSHOP<br />

DISTRICT/ SCHOOL:<br />

# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />

PELHAM/HUTCHINSON ELEM.<br />

# OF STUDENTS: 12 GRADE(S) K-2<br />

DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 10/11-11/22/11<br />

NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />

STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />

ARTIST: JONATHAN FLAKS COACHING ASSOC., I<br />

CONTRACT #: A7615B<br />

TITLE OF PROGRAM: ELLEN FLAKS - IMPROV THEATRE<br />

TYPE OF PROGRAM: WORKSHOP<br />

DISTRICT/ SCHOOL:<br />

# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />

PELHAM/HUTCHINSON ELEM.<br />

# OF STUDENTS: 9 GRADE(S) 3-5<br />

DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 10/13-12/8/11<br />

NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />

STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />

1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />

1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />

1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />

2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />

3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />

4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />

5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />

6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />

2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />

3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />

4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />

5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />

6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />

ANOTHER GREAT YEAR WITH ELLEN. THE STUDENTS LOOK<br />

FORWARD TO PARTICIPATING IN HER CLASS.<br />

8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />

NONE<br />

9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />

NONE<br />

7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />

ELLEN'S ENTHUSIASM IS CONTAGIST. THE STUDENTS LOOK<br />

FORWARD TO HER CLASS WEEK AFTER WEEK.<br />

8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />

NONE<br />

9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />

NONE<br />

ARTIST: JONATHAN FLAKS COACHING ASSOC., I<br />

CONTRACT #: A8374<br />

TITLE OF PROGRAM: ELLEN FLAKS - IMPROVE THEATRE<br />

TYPE OF PROGRAM: RESIDENCY<br />

DISTRICT/ SCHOOL:<br />

# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />

PELHAM/HUTCHINSON ELEM.<br />

# OF STUDENTS: 10 GRADE(S) 3-5<br />

DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 2/9-4/5/12<br />

NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />

STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />

ARTIST: JONATHAN KRUK<br />

CONTRACT #: A7830A<br />

TITLE OF PROGRAM: FAIRYTALE THEATRE<br />

TYPE OF PROGRAM: ASSEMBLY<br />

DISTRICT/ SCHOOL:<br />

# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />

PELHAM/COLONIAL ELEM.<br />

# OF STUDENTS: GRADE(S) 1<br />

DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 11/7/11<br />

NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />

STANDARD 1 STANDARD 2 STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />

1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />

1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />

1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />

2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />

3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />

4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />

5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />

6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />

2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />

3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />

4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />

5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />

6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />

ELLEN LOVES WORKING WITH THE CHILDREN. THERE IS AN<br />

ENERGY TO HER CLASS THAT IS UNBELIEVEABLE.<br />

8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />

NONE<br />

9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />

NONE<br />

7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM?<br />

NONE<br />

8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />

NONE<br />

9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />

NONE<br />

Y<br />

WHY?<br />

Arts in Education Service - School Evaluations <strong>2011</strong>-<strong>2012</strong><br />

Page 149 of 332


ARTIST: JONATHAN KRUK<br />

CONTRACT #: A8079B<br />

TITLE OF PROGRAM: FAIRYTALE THEATRE<br />

TYPE OF PROGRAM: ASSEMBLY<br />

DISTRICT/ SCHOOL:<br />

# OF TEACHERS: 4<br />

LAKELAND/LINCOLN-TITUS ELEM.<br />

# OF STUDENTS: 90 GRADE(S) 2<br />

DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 3/16/12<br />

NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />

STANDARD 1 STANDARD 2 STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4 X<br />

ARTIST: JONATHAN KRUK<br />

CONTRACT #: A8079A<br />

TITLE OF PROGRAM: FINGER FABLES<br />

TYPE OF PROGRAM: ASSEMBLY<br />

DISTRICT/ SCHOOL:<br />

# OF TEACHERS: 9<br />

LAKELAND/LINCOLN-TITUS ELEM.<br />

# OF STUDENTS: 84 GRADE(S) K & 1<br />

DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 3/16/12<br />

NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />

STANDARD 1 STANDARD 2 STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4 X<br />

1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />

1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />

1.<br />

2.<br />

3.<br />

4.<br />

5.<br />

6.<br />

STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />

ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />

EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />

ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />

TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />

QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />

HIS IS VERY ENGAGING AND DOES AN EXCELLENT JOB EXPOSING<br />

THE CHILDREN TO VARIOUS FORMS OF ART.<br />

8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />

NONE<br />

9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />

IT IS ALWAYS A PLEASURE TO SEE THE CHILDREN SO EXCITED<br />

ABOUT A PRESENTATION.<br />

1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />

2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />

3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />

4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />

5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />

6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />

7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />

CHILDREN WERE TOTALLY ENGAGED. HIS PERFORMANCE WAS<br />

AGE APPROPRIATE AND INTERACTIVE.<br />

8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />

NONE<br />

9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />

WE ARE LOOKING FORWARD TO HIS RETURN NEXT YEAR.<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

ARTIST: JONATHAN KRUK<br />

CONTRACT #: A8547<br />

TITLE OF PROGRAM: FINGER FABLES<br />

TYPE OF PROGRAM: ASSEMBLY/WORKSHOP<br />

DISTRICT/ SCHOOL:<br />

# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />

PELHAM/PROSPECT HILL ELEM.<br />

# OF STUDENTS: 47 GRADE(S) K & 1<br />

DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 5/2-4/12<br />

NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />

STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 X STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4 X<br />

ARTIST: JONATHAN KRUK<br />

CONTRACT #: A7790<br />

TITLE OF PROGRAM: FINGER FABLES<br />

TYPE OF PROGRAM: ASSEMBLY<br />

DISTRICT/ SCHOOL: PUTNAM VALLEY/PUTNAM VALLEY ELEM.<br />

# OF TEACHERS: 3<br />

# OF STUDENTS: 100 GRADE(S) K<br />

DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 10/4/11<br />

NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />

STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />

1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />

1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />

1.<br />

2.<br />

3.<br />

4.<br />

5.<br />

6.<br />

STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />

ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />

EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />

ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />

TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />

QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

4<br />

4<br />

7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />

HE IS A VERY ENGAGING STORYTELLER. THE STUDENTS WERE SO<br />

INSPIRED AND LOVED HEARING DIFFERENT FABLES AND<br />

FOLKTALES.<br />

8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />

NONE<br />

9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />

NONE<br />

1.<br />

2.<br />

3.<br />

4.<br />

5.<br />

6.<br />

STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />

ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />

EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />

ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />

TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />

QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />

GREAT PROGRAM. HE HAS A WONDERFUL WAY OF GETTING THE<br />

CHILDRENS ATTENTION AND KEEPING IT.<br />

8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />

MAYBE SOME VISUALS FOR THE ELL STUDENTS.<br />

9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />

FABULOUS, THANKS.<br />

Arts in Education Service - School Evaluations <strong>2011</strong>-<strong>2012</strong><br />

Page 150 of 332


ARTIST: JONATHAN KRUK<br />

CONTRACT #: A8348<br />

TITLE OF PROGRAM: FINGER FABLES<br />

TYPE OF PROGRAM: ASSEMBLY<br />

DISTRICT/ SCHOOL: KATONAH/LEWISBORO/LEWISBORO ELEM.<br />

# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />

# OF STUDENTS: 39 GRADE(S) K<br />

DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 1/27/12<br />

NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />

STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4 X<br />

ARTIST: JONATHAN KRUK<br />

CONTRACT #: A8397<br />

TITLE OF PROGRAM: FOLKTALES AROUND THE WORLD<br />

TYPE OF PROGRAM: WORKSHOP<br />

DISTRICT/ SCHOOL:<br />

# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />

SOMERS/PRIMROSE ELEM.<br />

# OF STUDENTS: 268 GRADE(S) 3<br />

DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 6/1/12<br />

NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />

STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4 X<br />

1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />

1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />

1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />

2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />

3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />

4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />

5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />

6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />

7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />

NONE<br />

8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />

NONE<br />

9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />

NONE<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

N/<br />

1.<br />

2.<br />

3.<br />

4.<br />

5.<br />

6.<br />

STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />

ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />

EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />

ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />

TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />

QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />

HIS PROGRAM IS RECEIVED WELL BY BOTH CHILDREN AND<br />

ADULTS. HE GETS STUDENTS INVOLVED AS CHARACTERS IN THE<br />

STORIES AND IT BECOMES A MEMORABLE EXPERIENCE.<br />

8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />

NONE<br />

9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />

WE WILL CONTINUE TO BOOK JONATHAN IN THE FUTURE.<br />

ARTIST: JONATHAN KRUK<br />

CONTRACT #: A7884<br />

TITLE OF PROGRAM: HALLOWEEN TALES AND HUDSON RIVER LORE<br />

TYPE OF PROGRAM: ASSEMBLY<br />

DISTRICT/ SCHOOL: HENDRICK HUDSON/FRANK G. LINDSEY ELEM.<br />

# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />

# OF STUDENTS: 472 GRADE(S) K-5<br />

DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 10/31/12<br />

NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />

STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4 X<br />

ARTIST: JONATHAN KRUK<br />

CONTRACT #: A8869<br />

TITLE OF PROGRAM: HUDSON VALLEY RIVER LORE<br />

TYPE OF PROGRAM: ASSEMBLY<br />

DISTRICT/ SCHOOL:<br />

# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />

TUCKAHOE/W. E. COTTLE ELEM.<br />

# OF STUDENTS: 100 GRADE(S) 4<br />

DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 6/18/12<br />

NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />

STANDARD 1 STANDARD 2 STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4 X<br />

1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />

1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />

1.<br />

2.<br />

3.<br />

4.<br />

5.<br />

6.<br />

STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />

ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />

EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />

ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />

TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />

QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />

WE HAVE HAD HIM HERE SEVERAL TIMES AND THE CHILDREN LOVE<br />

HIS PROGRAMS.<br />

8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />

NONE<br />

9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />

NONE<br />

1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />

2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />

3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />

4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />

5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />

6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />

7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />

NONE<br />

8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />

NONE<br />

9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />

NONE<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

Arts in Education Service - School Evaluations <strong>2011</strong>-<strong>2012</strong><br />

Page 151 of 332


ARTIST: JONATHAN KRUK<br />

CONTRACT #: A7830B<br />

TITLE OF PROGRAM: HUDSON VALLEY RIVER LORE<br />

TYPE OF PROGRAM: WORKSHOP<br />

DISTRICT/ SCHOOL:<br />

# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />

PELHAM/COLONIAL ELEM.<br />

# OF STUDENTS: GRADE(S) 4<br />

DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 5/2/12<br />

NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />

STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4 X<br />

ARTIST: JONATHAN KRUK<br />

CONTRACT #: A8879<br />

TITLE OF PROGRAM: HUDSON VALLEY RIVER LORE<br />

TYPE OF PROGRAM: ASSEMBLY<br />

DISTRICT/ SCHOOL: EASTCHESTER/ANNE HUTCHINSON ELEM.<br />

# OF TEACHERS: 5<br />

# OF STUDENTS: 21 GRADE(S) 4<br />

DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 6/13/12<br />

NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />

STANDARD 1 STANDARD 2 STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4 X<br />

1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />

1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />

1.<br />

2.<br />

3.<br />

4.<br />

5.<br />

6.<br />

STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />

ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />

EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />

ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />

TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />

QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />

4<br />

4<br />

5<br />

5<br />

4<br />

4<br />

7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />

HE IS WONDERFUL. HE TOLD GREAT STORIES THAT FIT PERFECTLY<br />

IN OUR SOCIAL STUDIES LEARNING AND LOCAL HISTORY.<br />

8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />

MAYBE A FORMAL FOLLOW UP ACTIVITY.<br />

9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />

IT WAS GREAT. THANK YOU.<br />

1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />

2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />

3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />

4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />

5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />

6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />

7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />

THIS PROGRAM WAS A WONDERFUL CULMINATION TO OUR<br />

HISTORICAL STUDIES OF NYS. STUDENTS HAD A FIELD TRIP TO<br />

WEST POINT AND COULD THUS VISUALIZE MANY OF THE<br />

LOCATIONS ON THE HUDSON RIVER.<br />

8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />

NONE<br />

9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />

NONE<br />

5<br />

5<br />

4<br />

4<br />

5<br />

N/<br />

ARTIST: JONATHAN KRUK<br />

CONTRACT #: A8721<br />

TITLE OF PROGRAM: HUDSON VALLEY RIVER LORE<br />

TYPE OF PROGRAM: ASSEMBLY/WORKSHOP<br />

DISTRICT/ SCHOOL:<br />

# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />

GARRISON/GARRISON SCHOOL<br />

# OF STUDENTS: 40 GRADE(S) 4<br />

DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 5/9/12<br />

NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />

STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 X STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4 X<br />

ARTIST: JONATHAN KRUK<br />

CONTRACT #: A7878<br />

TITLE OF PROGRAM: MEDIEVAL MANORS & MANNERS<br />

TYPE OF PROGRAM: ASSEMBLY<br />

DISTRICT/ SCHOOL: PUTNAM VALLEY/PUTNAM VALLEY MIDDLE SCHOOL<br />

# OF TEACHERS: 3<br />

# OF STUDENTS: 150 GRADE(S) 6<br />

DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 5/17/12<br />

NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />

STANDARD 1 STANDARD 2 STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4 X<br />

1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />

1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />

1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />

2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />

3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />

4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />

5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />

6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />

7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />

JONATHAN WEAVES LOCAL HISTORY INTO A FUN EDUCATIONAL<br />

SKIT. THE CHILDREN ENJOY LISTENING TO HIS STORIES AND<br />

PERFORMING HIS SKITS.<br />

8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />

NONE<br />

9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />

NONE<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />

2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />

3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />

4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />

5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />

6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />

7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />

NONE<br />

8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />

NONE<br />

9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />

NONE<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

Arts in Education Service - School Evaluations <strong>2011</strong>-<strong>2012</strong><br />

Page 152 of 332


ARTIST: JONATHAN KRUK<br />

CONTRACT #: A7743<br />

TITLE OF PROGRAM: MEDIEVAL MANORS & MANNERS<br />

TYPE OF PROGRAM: ASSEMBLY/WORKSHOP<br />

DISTRICT/ SCHOOL: LAKELAND/COPPER BEECH MIDDLE SCHOOL<br />

# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />

# OF STUDENTS: GRADE(S) 6<br />

DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 5/21-24/12<br />

NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />

STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 X STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4 X<br />

ARTIST: JONATHAN KRUK<br />

CONTRACT #: A8832<br />

TITLE OF PROGRAM: MEDIEVAL MANORS & MANNERS<br />

TYPE OF PROGRAM: ASSEMBLY<br />

DISTRICT/ SCHOOL: HALDANE/HALDANE ELEM. SCHOOL<br />

# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />

# OF STUDENTS: 64 GRADE(S) 6<br />

DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 5/20/12<br />

NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />

STANDARD 1 STANDARD 2 STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4 X<br />

1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />

1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />

1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />

2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />

3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />

4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />

5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />

6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />

7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />

THIS IS A WONDERFUL SUPPLEMENT TO ANY STUDY OF THE<br />

MIDDLE AGES. THE STORIES, SKITS, PROPS, COSTUMES AND<br />

JONATHAN BRING THIS PERIOD OF TIME TO LIFE.<br />

8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />

NONE<br />

9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />

JONATHAN IS ALWAYS ONE OF THE HIGHLIGHTS OF THE ACADEMIC<br />

Y EAR. TO NOT HAVE HIM APPEAR, WOULD BE TO MISS OUT ON<br />

SOMETHING SPECIAL.<br />

ARTIST: JONATHAN KRUK<br />

TITLE OF PROGRAM: STORYTELLING<br />

TYPE OF PROGRAM: ASSEMBLY<br />

DISTRICT/ SCHOOL:<br />

BREWSTER/GARDEN STREET ELEM.<br />

CONTRACT #: A8666<br />

# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />

# OF STUDENTS: GRADE(S) K-3<br />

DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE<br />

4/29/12<br />

NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />

STANDARD 1 STANDARD 2 STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />

1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

1.<br />

2.<br />

3.<br />

4.<br />

5.<br />

6.<br />

STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />

ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />

EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />

ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />

TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />

QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />

4<br />

5<br />

4<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />

JONATHAN DID AN OUTSTANDING JOB IN PRESENTING THE<br />

CONTENT IN AN ENGAGING MANNER AND INVOLVED THE AUDIENCE<br />

IN AS MANY WAYS AS POSSIBLE.<br />

8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />

NONE<br />

9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />

HE HELD THIS PRESENTATION IN RATHER EXTREME WEATHER<br />

CONDITIONS WHERE MANY STUDENTS WERE DISTRACTED BY THE<br />

INTENSE HEAT. HE STILL MANAGED TO KEEP THE STUDENTS<br />

ENGAGED.<br />

ARTIST: JONATHAN LOHMAN<br />

CONTRACT #: A8560<br />

TITLE OF PROGRAM: MUSICIANS FROM THE CROOKED ROAD - MASTER<br />

CLASS<br />

TYPE OF PROGRAM: ASSEMBLY/WORKSHOP<br />

DISTRICT/ SCHOOL: IRVINGTON/DOWS LANE ELEM & MS, HS<br />

# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />

# OF STUDENTS: 500 GRADE(S) 1-12<br />

DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 3/15-16/12<br />

NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />

STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 X STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4 X<br />

1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />

1.<br />

2.<br />

3.<br />

4.<br />

5.<br />

6.<br />

STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />

ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />

EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />

ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />

TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />

QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

N/<br />

7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />

JONATHAN WAS FANTASTIC. IT IS ALWAYS A PLEASURE TO HEAR<br />

HIM TELL HIS STORIES. WE WERE SO GALD HE WAS ABLE TO<br />

RETURN.<br />

8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />

NONE<br />

9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />

NONE<br />

1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />

2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />

3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />

4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />

5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />

6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />

7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />

THESE MUSICIANS RELATE TO STUDENTS OF ALL AGES<br />

NATURALLY. THEY ARE TRUE MASTERS AND LOVE SHARING IT<br />

WITH OTHERS.<br />

8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />

NONE<br />

9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />

THE MUSICIANS TOOK A NEW SONG AND TAUGHT IT TO THE HS<br />

AND MS ORCHESTRAS WITHIN 15 MINUTES. THE STUDENTS<br />

REALLY ENJOYED THE EXPERIENCE.<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

Arts in Education Service - School Evaluations <strong>2011</strong>-<strong>2012</strong><br />

Page 153 of 332


ARTIST: JONATHAN SPROUT<br />

CONTRACT #: A8661<br />

TITLE OF PROGRAM: AMERICAN HEROES I - MUSICAL SHOW<br />

TYPE OF PROGRAM: ASSEMBLY<br />

DISTRICT/ SCHOOL: KATONAH/LEWISBORO/INCREASE MILLER ELEM.<br />

# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />

# OF STUDENTS: GRADE(S) 2<br />

DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 3/6/12<br />

NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />

STANDARD 1 STANDARD 2 STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4 X<br />

ARTIST: JONATHAN SPROUT<br />

CONTRACT #: A8417<br />

TITLE OF PROGRAM: AMERICAN HEROES I - MUSICAL SHOW<br />

TYPE OF PROGRAM: ASSEMBLY<br />

DISTRICT/ SCHOOL: EASTCHESTER/WAVERLY EARLY CHILDHOOD CTR<br />

# OF TEACHERS: 6<br />

# OF STUDENTS: 225 GRADE(S) 1<br />

DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 2/16/12<br />

NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />

STANDARD 1 STANDARD 2 STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4 X<br />

1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />

1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />

1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />

2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />

3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />

4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />

5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />

6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />

7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />

ABSOLUTELY. HE IS ENGAGING AND ACADEMICALLY<br />

APPROPRIATE FOR CHILDREN OF ALL AGES.<br />

8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />

NONE<br />

9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />

HIS MESSAGE ABOUT HEROES IS IMPORTANT. A HERO IS NOT<br />

NECESSARILY SOMEONE WHO IS FAMOUS BUT RATHER SOMEONE<br />

WHO MAKES A DIFFERENCE IN OTHER PEOPLES LIVES.<br />

ARTIST: JONATHAN SPROUT<br />

CONTRACT #: A7809<br />

TITLE OF PROGRAM: AMERICAN HEROES I - MUSICAL SHOW<br />

TYPE OF PROGRAM: ASSEMBLY<br />

DISTRICT/ SCHOOL:<br />

CHAPPAQUA/WESTORCHARD ELEM.<br />

# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />

# OF STUDENTS: GRADE(S) 2<br />

DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE<br />

2/16/12<br />

NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />

STANDARD 1 STANDARD 2 STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4 X<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />

2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />

3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />

4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />

5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />

6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />

7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />

GREAT PROGRAM. VERY AGE APPROPRIATE AND INFORMATIVE.<br />

THE CHILDREN CONTINUED TO TALK ABOUT THE HEROES WHEN<br />

THEY RETURNED TO THE CLASSROOM. THE DANCING AND<br />

AUDIENCE PARTICIPATION WERE GREAT. THE ARTIST HAD A NICE<br />

RAPPORT WITH THE STUDENTS.<br />

8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />

PERHAPS YOU COULD SHORTEN THE PROGRAM. THIS MIGHT HELP<br />

TO BETTER HOLD THE STUDENTS.<br />

9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />

A WONDERFULLY CRAFTED PROGRAM. WE LOOK FORWARD TO<br />

THIS PROGRAM AGAIN NEXT YEAR.<br />

ARTIST: JONATHAN SPROUT<br />

CONTRACT #: A8001<br />

TITLE OF PROGRAM: AMERICAN HEROES I - MUSICAL SHOW<br />

TYPE OF PROGRAM: ASSEMBLY<br />

DISTRICT/ SCHOOL:<br />

KATONAH/LEWISBORO/MEADOWPOND ELEM.<br />

# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />

# OF STUDENTS: 68 GRADE(S) 2<br />

DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 3/6/12<br />

NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />

STANDARD 1 STANDARD 2 STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4 X<br />

4<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />

1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />

1.<br />

2.<br />

3.<br />

4.<br />

5.<br />

6.<br />

STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />

ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />

EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />

ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />

TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />

QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />

VERY APPROPRIATE AND STUDENT FRIENDLY. VERY RELEVANT TO<br />

SOCIAL STUDIES UNIT ON HEROES.<br />

8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />

NONE<br />

9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />

WE TRULY ENJOYED THE SHOW. WE ARE LOOKING FORWARD TO<br />

HAVING HIM BACK.<br />

1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />

2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />

3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />

4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />

5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />

6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />

7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />

STUDENTS LOVED IT. EVERYONE IS INVOLVED AND LEARNS<br />

ABOUT HISTORY, PEOPLE AND EVENTS.<br />

8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />

NONE<br />

9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />

MIGHT TRY DIFFERENT LONGS NEXT YEAR.<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

Arts in Education Service - School Evaluations <strong>2011</strong>-<strong>2012</strong><br />

Page 154 of 332


ARTIST:<br />

JONATHAN WOLLOCH<br />

TITLE OF PROGRAM: KANDINSKY MUSIC AND ART<br />

TYPE OF PROGRAM: RESIDENCY<br />

DISTRICT/ SCHOOL:<br />

CONTRACT #: A8677<br />

NEW ROCHELLE/TRINITY ELEM. SCHOOL<br />

# OF TEACHERS: 4<br />

# OF STUDENTS: 150 GRADE(S) 2<br />

DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE<br />

4/3-25/12<br />

NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />

STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 X STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4 X<br />

1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />

1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />

2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />

3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />

4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />

5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />

6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />

7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />

THE STUDENTS RESPONDED WELL TO THE PROJECT.<br />

8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />

TIMING WAS A PROBLEM AS MOST STUDENTS FELT THEY DIDN'T<br />

COMPLETE THEIR WORK.<br />

9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />

NONE<br />

ARTIST: JOSEPH BERGAMINI<br />

CONTRACT #: A8645<br />

TITLE OF PROGRAM: BASSOON PLAYER FOR THE SHOW - A FUNNY THING<br />

HAPPENED ON THE WAY TO THE FORUM<br />

TYPE OF PROGRAM: ASSEMBLY<br />

DISTRICT/ SCHOOL:<br />

PUTNAM VALLEY/PUTNAM VALLEY HIGH SCHOOL<br />

# OF TEACHERS: 3<br />

# OF STUDENTS: 400 GRADE(S) 9-12<br />

DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE<br />

4/13-23/12<br />

NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />

STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />

1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />

5<br />

4<br />

5<br />

4<br />

3<br />

4<br />

ARTIST:<br />

JOSEPH ABRAMO<br />

CONTRACT #: A8065<br />

TITLE OF PROGRAM: BANJO, UKUELE & GUITAR PLAYER FOR THE SHOW -<br />

BARNUM<br />

TYPE OF PROGRAM: ASSEMBLY<br />

DISTRICT/ SCHOOL:<br />

NORTH SALEM/NORTH SALEM MS & HS<br />

# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />

# OF STUDENTS: 200 GRADE(S) 6-12<br />

DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE<br />

2/4-12/12<br />

NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />

STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />

1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />

1.<br />

2.<br />

3.<br />

4.<br />

5.<br />

6.<br />

STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />

ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />

EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />

ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />

TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />

QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />

MR. ABRAMO'S SKILL ON STRINGED INSTRUMENTS IS IMPRESSIVE<br />

TO STUDENTS.<br />

8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />

NONE<br />

9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />

NONE<br />

ARTIST: JOSEPH BERTE<br />

CONTRACT #: A8781<br />

TITLE OF PROGRAM: BALLONACY ABC, LETTER SOUNDS AND WORDS<br />

TYPE OF PROGRAM: ASSEMBLY<br />

DISTRICT/ SCHOOL: WHITE PLAINS/MAMARONECK AVENUE ELEM. ELEM.<br />

# OF TEACHERS: 5<br />

# OF STUDENTS: 108 GRADE(S) K<br />

DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 5/16/12<br />

NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />

STANDARD 1 STANDARD 2 STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />

1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />

1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />

2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />

3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />

4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />

5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />

6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />

7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />

NONE<br />

8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />

NONE<br />

9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />

NONE<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />

2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />

3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />

4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />

5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />

6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />

7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />

THE STUDENTS TRULY ENJOYED HIS PUPPETS. THEY WERE<br />

THOROUGHLY ENTERTAINED AND LAUGHED ALL THROUGH THE<br />

SHOW.<br />

8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />

SOME OF THE TEACHING COULD BE MORE CHALLENGING.<br />

9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />

IT WAS A GREAT EXPERIENCE FOR OUR CHILDREN WHO<br />

OTHERWISE MAY NOT HAVE THE OPPORTUNITY TO SEE A REAL<br />

CLOWN.<br />

5<br />

3<br />

4<br />

5<br />

5<br />

N/<br />

Arts in Education Service - School Evaluations <strong>2011</strong>-<strong>2012</strong><br />

Page 155 of 332


ARTIST: JOSEPH FIELDS<br />

CONTRACT #: A7609B<br />

TITLE OF PROGRAM: ADVANCED MAGIC<br />

TYPE OF PROGRAM: WORKSHOP<br />

DISTRICT/ SCHOOL:<br />

# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />

PELHAM/SIWANOY ELEM.<br />

# OF STUDENTS: 13 GRADE(S) 1-5<br />

DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 10/4-11/29/11<br />

NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />

STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 X STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />

ARTIST: JOSEPH FIELDS<br />

CONTRACT #: A8354A<br />

TITLE OF PROGRAM: ADVANCED MAGIC<br />

TYPE OF PROGRAM: WORKSHOP<br />

DISTRICT/ SCHOOL:<br />

# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />

PELHAM/SIWANOY ELEM.<br />

# OF STUDENTS: 11 GRADE(S) 1-5<br />

DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 1/30-3/26/12<br />

NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />

STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 X STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />

1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />

1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />

1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />

2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />

3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />

4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />

5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />

6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />

5<br />

5<br />

4<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />

2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />

3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />

4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />

5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />

6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />

4<br />

4<br />

3<br />

4<br />

4<br />

4<br />

7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM?<br />

THE STUDENTS LOVED IT.<br />

Y<br />

WHY?<br />

7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM?<br />

NONE<br />

Y<br />

WHY?<br />

8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />

NONE<br />

9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />

NONE<br />

8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />

NONE<br />

9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />

NONE<br />

ARTIST: JOSEPH FIELDS<br />

CONTRACT #: A7967<br />

TITLE OF PROGRAM: ART OF MAGIC<br />

TYPE OF PROGRAM: WORKSHOP<br />

DISTRICT/ SCHOOL:<br />

# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />

PELHAM/COLONIAL ELEM.<br />

# OF STUDENTS: 12 GRADE(S) 1-3<br />

DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 12/1/11-2/16/12<br />

NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />

STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 X STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />

ARTIST: JOSEPH FIELDS<br />

CONTRACT #: A8609<br />

TITLE OF PROGRAM: MAGIC<br />

TYPE OF PROGRAM: WORKSHOP<br />

DISTRICT/ SCHOOL: EASTCHESTER/GREENVALE ELEM.<br />

# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />

# OF STUDENTS: 14 GRADE(S) 2-4<br />

DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 3/14-5/9/12<br />

NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />

STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 X STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />

1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />

1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />

1.<br />

2.<br />

3.<br />

4.<br />

5.<br />

6.<br />

STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />

ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />

EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />

ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />

TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />

QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

N/<br />

N/<br />

7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />

THE CHILDREN LOVED THIS CLASS. THEY WERE ATTENTIVE AND<br />

HAD A LOT OF FUN WHILE LEARNING TRICKS AND HOW TO<br />

PERFORM MAGIC TRICKS IN FRONT OF AN AUDIENCE.<br />

8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />

NONE<br />

9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />

JOE IS A VERY GOOD TEACHER AND ENTERTAINER.<br />

1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />

2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />

3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />

4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />

5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />

6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />

7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />

WONDERFUL INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS.<br />

8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />

NONE<br />

9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />

NONE<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

N/<br />

Arts in Education Service - School Evaluations <strong>2011</strong>-<strong>2012</strong><br />

Page 156 of 332


ARTIST: JOSEPH FIELDS<br />

CONTRACT #: A7663<br />

TITLE OF PROGRAM: MAGIC<br />

TYPE OF PROGRAM: WORKSHOP<br />

DISTRICT/ SCHOOL: EASTCHESTER/GREENVALE ELEM.<br />

# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />

# OF STUDENTS: 18 GRADE(S) 2-4<br />

DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 10/19-12/14/11<br />

NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />

STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 X STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />

ARTIST: JOSEPH FIELDS<br />

CONTRACT #: A8354B<br />

TITLE OF PROGRAM: MAGIC - BASIC<br />

TYPE OF PROGRAM: WORKSHOP<br />

DISTRICT/ SCHOOL:<br />

# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />

PELHAM/SIWANOY ELEM.<br />

# OF STUDENTS: 10 GRADE(S) 1-5<br />

DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 1/30-3/26/12<br />

NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />

STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 X STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />

1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />

1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />

1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />

2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />

3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />

4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />

5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />

6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

N/<br />

1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />

2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />

3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />

4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />

5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />

6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />

4<br />

4<br />

4<br />

3<br />

4<br />

4<br />

7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />

AWESOME CLASS, AWESOME TEACHER. JOSEPH IS A CLASS<br />

FAVORITE.<br />

8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />

NONE<br />

9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />

NONE<br />

7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM?<br />

NONE<br />

8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />

NONE<br />

9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />

NONE<br />

Y<br />

WHY?<br />

ARTIST: JOSEPH FIELDS<br />

CONTRACT #: A7609A<br />

TITLE OF PROGRAM: MAGIC - BASIC<br />

TYPE OF PROGRAM: WORKSHOP<br />

DISTRICT/ SCHOOL:<br />

# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />

PELHAM/SIWANOY ELEM.<br />

# OF STUDENTS: 9 GRADE(S) K & 1<br />

DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 12/20/11<br />

NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />

STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 X STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />

ARTIST: JOSEPH FIELDS<br />

CONTRACT #: A8058A<br />

TITLE OF PROGRAM: MAGIC I<br />

TYPE OF PROGRAM: WORKSHOP<br />

DISTRICT/ SCHOOL:<br />

# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />

PELHAM/PROSPECT HILL ELEM.<br />

# OF STUDENTS: 20 GRADE(S) 3-5<br />

DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 1/11-3/7/12<br />

NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />

STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 X STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />

1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />

1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />

1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />

2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />

3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />

4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />

5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />

6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />

5<br />

5<br />

4<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />

2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />

3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />

4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />

5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />

6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

N/<br />

7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM?<br />

THE STUDENTS LOVED IT.<br />

Y<br />

WHY?<br />

7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM?<br />

NONE<br />

Y<br />

WHY?<br />

8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />

NONE<br />

9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />

NONE<br />

8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />

NONE<br />

9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />

NONE<br />

Arts in Education Service - School Evaluations <strong>2011</strong>-<strong>2012</strong><br />

Page 157 of 332


ARTIST: JOSEPH FIELDS<br />

CONTRACT #: A8058B<br />

TITLE OF PROGRAM: MAGIC II<br />

TYPE OF PROGRAM: WORKSHOP<br />

DISTRICT/ SCHOOL:<br />

# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />

PELHAM/PROSPECT HILL ELEM.<br />

# OF STUDENTS: 20 GRADE(S) K-2<br />

DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 1/13-3/9/12<br />

NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />

STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 X STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />

ARTIST: JOSEPH MULLINS<br />

CONTRACT #: A8790<br />

TITLE OF PROGRAM: GYOTAKU FISH PRINTS<br />

TYPE OF PROGRAM: WORKSHOP<br />

DISTRICT/ SCHOOL: NEW ROCHELLE/TRINITY ELEM. SCHOOL<br />

# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />

# OF STUDENTS: 172 GRADE(S) 3<br />

DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 5/7-9/12<br />

NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />

STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 X STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4 X<br />

1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />

1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />

1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />

2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />

3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />

4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />

5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />

6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />

7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />

NONE<br />

8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />

NONE<br />

9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />

NONE<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

N/<br />

1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />

2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />

3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />

4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />

5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />

6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />

7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />

STUDENTS WERE ENGAGED AND EXCITED AND JOE WAS WELL<br />

ORGANIZED AND WELL RECEIVED.<br />

8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />

TIMING WAS A SLIGHT PROBLEM. NEED AT LEAST AN HOUR FOR<br />

THE WORKSHOP NEXT TIME.<br />

9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />

NONE<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

4<br />

5<br />

ARTIST: JOSEPH MURPHY<br />

CONTRACT #: A7508B<br />

TITLE OF PROGRAM: 3D GRAPHIC ART & ANIMATION<br />

TYPE OF PROGRAM: WORKSHOP<br />

DISTRICT/ SCHOOL: KATONAH/LEWISBORO/INCREASE MILLER ELEM.<br />

# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />

# OF STUDENTS: 7 GRADE(S) 3-5<br />

DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 10/6-12/8/11<br />

NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />

STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 X STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />

ARTIST: JOSEPH MURPHY<br />

CONTRACT #: A8226A<br />

TITLE OF PROGRAM: ELECTRONIC MUSIC STUDIO<br />

TYPE OF PROGRAM: WORKSHOP<br />

DISTRICT/ SCHOOL: KATONAH/LEWISBORO/INCREASE MILLER ELEM.<br />

# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />

# OF STUDENTS: 7 GRADE(S) 3-5<br />

DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 1/17-3/13/12<br />

NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />

STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 X STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />

1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />

1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />

1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />

2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />

3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />

4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />

5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />

6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />

7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />

THE BRYCE GRAPHIC DESIGN PROGRAM PROVIDES A GREAT<br />

LEARNING EXPERIENCE FOR STUDENTS.<br />

8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />

NONE<br />

9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />

NONE<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

N/<br />

1.<br />

2.<br />

3.<br />

4.<br />

5.<br />

6.<br />

STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />

ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />

EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />

ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />

TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />

QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

N/<br />

7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />

WE GET REPEAT STUDENTS FOR THIS CLASS. STUDENTS ENJOY IT<br />

SO MUCH THEY ASK THEIR PARENTS TO SIGN THEM UP AGAIN.<br />

8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />

NONE<br />

9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />

NONE<br />

Arts in Education Service - School Evaluations <strong>2011</strong>-<strong>2012</strong><br />

Page 158 of 332


ARTIST: JOSEPH MURPHY<br />

CONTRACT #: A8226B<br />

TITLE OF PROGRAM: GRAPHIC DESIGN<br />

TYPE OF PROGRAM: WORKSHOP<br />

DISTRICT/ SCHOOL: KATONAH/LEWISBORO/INCREASE MILLER ELEM.<br />

# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />

# OF STUDENTS: 9 GRADE(S) 3-5<br />

DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 1/18-3/14/12<br />

NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />

STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 X STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />

ARTIST: JOSEPH PETRIZZO<br />

CONTRACT #: A8575<br />

TITLE OF PROGRAM: TROMBONE PLAYER FOR THE SHOW - SUGAR<br />

TYPE OF PROGRAM: ASSEMBLY<br />

DISTRICT/ SCHOOL: BRIARCLIFF/BRIARCLIFF HIGH SCHOOL<br />

# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />

# OF STUDENTS: 70 GRADE(S) 9-12<br />

DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 3/4-11/12<br />

NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />

STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />

1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />

1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />

1.<br />

2.<br />

3.<br />

4.<br />

5.<br />

6.<br />

STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />

ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />

EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />

ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />

TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />

QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />

JOE IS A FABULOUS TEACHER WHO IS LOVED BY ALL. HE MAKES<br />

LEARNING FUN.<br />

8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />

NONE<br />

9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />

NONE<br />

1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />

2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />

3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />

4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />

5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />

6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />

7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />

EXCELLENT USE OF BROADWAY THEATRICAL TECHNIQUES.<br />

8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />

NONE<br />

9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />

NONE<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

ARTIST: JOSEPH RYAN<br />

CONTRACT #: A7530<br />

TITLE OF PROGRAM: LIVING HISTORY - LIFE AN AN AMERICAN<br />

REVOLUTIONARY WAR SOLDIER<br />

TYPE OF PROGRAM: ASSEMBLY<br />

DISTRICT/ SCHOOL:<br />

# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />

LAKELAND/VAN CORT ELEM.<br />

# OF STUDENTS: 100 GRADE(S) 5<br />

DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 6/13/12<br />

NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />

STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4 X<br />

ARTIST: JOSEPH RYAN<br />

CONTRACT #: A8480<br />

TITLE OF PROGRAM: LIVING HISTORY - LIFE OF AN AMERICAN<br />

REVOLUTIONARY WAR SOLDIER<br />

TYPE OF PROGRAM: ASSEMBLY<br />

DISTRICT/ SCHOOL: LAKELAND/BENJAMIN FRANKLIN ELEM.<br />

# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />

# OF STUDENTS: 102 GRADE(S) 4<br />

DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 5/1/12<br />

NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />

STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4 X<br />

1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />

1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />

1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />

2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />

3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />

4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />

5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />

6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />

7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />

JOE CONTINUES TO DO A FANTASTIC JOB FOR MAKING HISTORY<br />

COME ALIVE. HE IS AN AMAZING PRESENTER.<br />

8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />

NONE<br />

9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />

THANKS AGAIN AND I HOPE WE WILL BE LUCKY ENOUGH TO HAVE<br />

HIM BACK NEXT YEAR.<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

1.<br />

2.<br />

3.<br />

4.<br />

5.<br />

6.<br />

STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />

ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />

EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />

ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />

TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />

QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />

THE STUDENTS ARE ALWAYS ENGAGED AND CAME AWAY WITH A<br />

WEALTH OF KNOWLEDGE.<br />

8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />

NONE<br />

9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />

NONE<br />

Arts in Education Service - School Evaluations <strong>2011</strong>-<strong>2012</strong><br />

Page 159 of 332


ARTIST: JOSEPH RYAN<br />

CONTRACT #: A8776<br />

TITLE OF PROGRAM: LIVING HISTORY - LIFE OF AN AMERICAN<br />

REVOLUTIONARY WAR SOLDIER<br />

TYPE OF PROGRAM: ASSEMBLY<br />

DISTRICT/ SCHOOL:<br />

# OF TEACHERS: 3<br />

LAKELAND/LINCOLN-TITUS ELEM.<br />

# OF STUDENTS: 70 GRADE(S) 4<br />

DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 5/4/12<br />

NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />

STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4 X<br />

ARTIST: JOSEPH SIPOS<br />

CONTRACT #: A8246<br />

TITLE OF PROGRAM: SET DESIGNER ASST. FOR THE SHOW - THE<br />

DROWSY CHAPERONE<br />

TYPE OF PROGRAM: RESIDENCY<br />

DISTRICT/ SCHOOL: KATONAH/LEWISBORO/JOHN JAY MIDDLE SCHOOL<br />

# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />

# OF STUDENTS: 75 GRADE(S) 6-8<br />

DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 1/15-3/15/12<br />

NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />

STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 X STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />

1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />

1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />

1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />

2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />

3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />

4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />

5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />

6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />

7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />

JOE WAS ENGAGING AND KNOWLEDGEABLE. HE PROVIDED A<br />

DYNAMIC AND INTERACTIVE PRESENTATION.<br />

8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />

TEACHERS NEED TO BE NOTIFIED PRIOR TO THE DAY THAT AV<br />

EQUIPMENT IS NEEDED. ALSO, SCHOOLS NEED ADVANCE<br />

NOTIFICATION OF THE MUSKET FIRING DEMONSTRATION FOR<br />

SECURITY REASONS AND TO ADDRESS THE CONCERNS OF<br />

CHILDREN WITH SPECIAL NEEDS.<br />

9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />

NONE<br />

5<br />

5<br />

4<br />

5<br />

5<br />

N/<br />

1.<br />

2.<br />

3.<br />

4.<br />

5.<br />

6.<br />

STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />

ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />

EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />

ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />

TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />

QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

1<br />

1<br />

N/<br />

7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />

JOE CONSTRUCTED THE MOST AMAZING SETS. THIS SHOW WILL<br />

BE HARD TO TOP.<br />

8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />

NONE<br />

9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />

NONE<br />

ARTIST: JOSEPH SIPOS<br />

CONTRACT #: A7639<br />

TITLE OF PROGRAM: SET DESIGNER ASST. FOR THE SHOW - TWILIGHT<br />

ZONE<br />

TYPE OF PROGRAM: RESIDENCY<br />

DISTRICT/ SCHOOL: KATONAH/LEWISBORO/JOHN JAY MIDDLE SCHOOL<br />

# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />

# OF STUDENTS: 45 GRADE(S) 6-8<br />

DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 10/3-11/8/11<br />

NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />

STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 X STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />

1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />

ARTIST: JOSEPH STAMBONI<br />

CONTRACT #: A8576<br />

TITLE OF PROGRAM: TRUMPET PLAYER FOR THE SHOW - SUGAR<br />

TYPE OF PROGRAM: ASSEMBLY<br />

DISTRICT/ SCHOOL: BRIARCLIFF/BRIARCLIFF HIGH SCHOOL<br />

# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />

# OF STUDENTS: 70 GRADE(S) 9-12<br />

DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 3/4-11/12<br />

NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />

STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />

1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />

1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />

2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />

3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />

4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />

5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />

6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />

7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />

JOE IS A MASTER AT WHAT HE DOES. HE IS CREATIVE, PATIENT<br />

AND VERY FLEXIBLE ABOUT LAST MINUTE CHANGES.<br />

8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />

NONE<br />

9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />

NONE<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

N/<br />

1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />

2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />

3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />

4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />

5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />

6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />

7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />

THE INTERACTION BETWEEN STUDENTS AND PROFESSIONAL<br />

MUSICIANS WAS INVALUABLE.<br />

8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />

NONE<br />

9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />

NONE<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

N/<br />

Arts in Education Service - School Evaluations <strong>2011</strong>-<strong>2012</strong><br />

Page 160 of 332


ARTIST: JOSEPH STELLUTI<br />

CONTRACT #: A8431<br />

TITLE OF PROGRAM: SAX, CLARINET & FLUTE PLAYER FOR THE - SHOW<br />

THE DROWSY CHAPERONE<br />

TYPE OF PROGRAM: ASSEMBLY<br />

DISTRICT/ SCHOOL: KATONAH/LEWISBORO/JOHN JAY MIDDLE SCHOOL<br />

# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />

# OF STUDENTS: 75 GRADE(S) 6-8<br />

DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 3/3-17/12<br />

NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />

STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />

1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />

ARTIST: JOSEPH TRIONFERO dba SHOW OF LOV<br />

CONTRACT #: A7959<br />

TITLE OF PROGRAM: CHARACTER ED SHOW<br />

TYPE OF PROGRAM: ASSEMBLY<br />

DISTRICT/ SCHOOL: CHAPPAQUA/WESTORCHARD ELEM.<br />

# OF TEACHERS: 5<br />

# OF STUDENTS: 53 GRADE(S) K-4<br />

DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 1/5/12<br />

NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />

STANDARD 1 STANDARD 2 STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />

1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />

1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />

2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />

3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />

4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />

5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />

6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />

7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />

THE PIT ORCHESTRA WAS AWESOME.<br />

8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />

NONE<br />

9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />

NONE<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

N/<br />

1.<br />

2.<br />

3.<br />

4.<br />

5.<br />

6.<br />

STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />

ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />

EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />

ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />

TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />

QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />

3<br />

3<br />

3<br />

3<br />

3<br />

3<br />

7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />

IT'S GETTING FURTHER FROM THE POINT AND MORE GAME SHOW.<br />

I'M NOT SURE THE YOUNGER STUDENTS GOT IT.<br />

8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />

NONE<br />

9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />

NONE<br />

ARTIST: JOSEPH WALLACE<br />

CONTRACT #: A8505<br />

TITLE OF PROGRAM: STORYTELLING & CREATIVE WRITING RESIDENCY<br />

TYPE OF PROGRAM: RESIDENCY<br />

DISTRICT/ SCHOOL: PLEASANTVILLE/BEDFORD ROAD ELEM.<br />

# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />

# OF STUDENTS: 125 GRADE(S) 4<br />

DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 2/28-3/26/12<br />

NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />

STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />

ARTIST: JOURNEYS INTO AMERICAN INDIAN TER CONTRACT #: A7829<br />

TITLE OF PROGRAM: ROBERT VETTER - EASTERN WOODLAND INDIANS<br />

TYPE OF PROGRAM: ASSEMBLY/WORKSHOP<br />

DISTRICT/ SCHOOL:<br />

# OF TEACHERS: 5<br />

TUCKAHOE/W. E. COTTLE ELEM.<br />

# OF STUDENTS: 100 GRADE(S) 4<br />

DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 11/3/11<br />

NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />

STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 X STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4 X<br />

1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />

1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />

1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />

2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />

3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />

4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />

5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />

6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />

7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />

THE CHILDREN LOVED HEARING HIS STORIES AND HE TRULY<br />

INSPIRED THEM TO BE MORE CREATIVE WRITERS.<br />

8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />

NONE<br />

9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />

NONE<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

4<br />

1.<br />

2.<br />

3.<br />

4.<br />

5.<br />

6.<br />

STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />

ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />

EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />

ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />

TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />

QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

N/<br />

7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />

THE TEACHERS AND STUDENTS LOVE THIS PROGRAM. IT<br />

CORRELATES PERFECTLY WITH THEIR COURSE OF STUDY. ITS FUN<br />

AND EDUCATIONAL.<br />

8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />

NONE<br />

9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />

LOOKING FORWARD TO NEXT YEAR.<br />

Arts in Education Service - School Evaluations <strong>2011</strong>-<strong>2012</strong><br />

Page 161 of 332


ARTIST: JOURNEYS INTO AMERICAN INDIAN TER CONTRACT #: A8833<br />

TITLE OF PROGRAM: ROBERT VETTER - EASTERN WOODLAND INDIANS<br />

TYPE OF PROGRAM: ASSEMBLY/WORKSHOP<br />

DISTRICT/ SCHOOL: HENDRICK HUDSON/FURNACE WOODS ELEM.<br />

# OF TEACHERS: 3<br />

# OF STUDENTS: 71 GRADE(S) 4<br />

DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 6/8/12<br />

NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />

STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 X STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4 X<br />

ARTIST: JOURNEYS INTO AMERICAN INDIAN TER CONTRACT #: A7543<br />

TITLE OF PROGRAM: ROBERT VETTER - EASTERN WOODLAND INDIANS<br />

TYPE OF PROGRAM: ASSEMBLY/WORKSHOP<br />

DISTRICT/ SCHOOL:<br />

# OF TEACHERS: 5<br />

CHAPPAQUA/GRAFFLIN ELEM.<br />

# OF STUDENTS: 125 GRADE(S) 4 & 5<br />

DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 12/6/11<br />

NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />

STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 X STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4 X<br />

1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />

1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />

1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />

2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />

3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />

4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />

5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />

6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />

7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />

THIS WAS A WONDERFUL, HANDS ON MEMORABLE DAY. THE<br />

STUDENTS WERE THRILLED TO HAVE THIS OPPORTUNITY.<br />

8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />

WOULD REALLY LIKE TO HAVE SEEN THE PRINTABLE STUDENT<br />

WORKSHEETS THAT WERE ADVERTISED AS A FOLLOW UP TO THE<br />

DAY.<br />

9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />

WE REALLY WERE IMPRESSED WITH THE QUALITY OF THE<br />

PROGRAM.<br />

ARTIST: JOURNEYS INTO AMERICAN INDIAN TER CONTRACT #: A7657<br />

TITLE OF PROGRAM: ROBERT VETTER - EASTERN WOODLAND INDIANS<br />

TYPE OF PROGRAM: ASSEMBLY/WORKSHOP<br />

DISTRICT/ SCHOOL:<br />

LAKELAND/GEORGE WASHINGTON ELEM.<br />

# OF TEACHERS: 3<br />

# OF STUDENTS: 64 GRADE(S) 4<br />

DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE<br />

9/20/11<br />

NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />

STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 X STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4 X<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

1.<br />

2.<br />

3.<br />

4.<br />

5.<br />

6.<br />

STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />

ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />

EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />

ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />

TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />

QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />

ABSOLUTELY. A WONDERFUL HANDS-ON LEARNING EXPERIENCE.<br />

8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />

NONE<br />

9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />

NONE<br />

ARTIST: JOURNEYS INTO AMERICAN INDIAN TER CONTRACT #: A8208<br />

TITLE OF PROGRAM: ROBERT VETTER - EASTERN WOODLAND INDIANS<br />

TYPE OF PROGRAM: ASSEMBLY/WORKSHOP<br />

DISTRICT/ SCHOOL:<br />

CHAPPAQUA/ROARING BROOK ELEM.<br />

# OF TEACHERS: 5<br />

# OF STUDENTS: 102 GRADE(S) 4<br />

DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 1/24/12<br />

NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />

STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 X STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4 X<br />

1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />

1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />

1.<br />

2.<br />

3.<br />

4.<br />

5.<br />

6.<br />

STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />

ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />

EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />

ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />

TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />

QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />

4<br />

5<br />

5<br />

4<br />

3<br />

5<br />

7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />

THIS PROGRAM IS VERY HARDS-ON AND MOTIVATING TO THE<br />

STUDENTS. MANY DIFFERENT ACTIVITIES ALLOW STUDENTS TO<br />

REMAIN ENGAGED.<br />

8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />

NONE<br />

9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />

NONE<br />

1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />

2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />

3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />

4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />

5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />

6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />

7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />

RICH EXPERIENCE AND THE STUDENTS WERE ENGAGED.<br />

8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />

WOULD BENEFIT FROM VISUAL SUPPORTS.<br />

9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />

AN AMAZING PROGRAM.<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

N/<br />

Arts in Education Service - School Evaluations <strong>2011</strong>-<strong>2012</strong><br />

Page 162 of 332


ARTIST: JOURNEYS INTO AMERICAN INDIAN TER CONTRACT #: A7895<br />

TITLE OF PROGRAM: ROBERT VETTER - EASTERN WOODLAND INDIANS<br />

TYPE OF PROGRAM: ASSEMBLY/WORKSHOP<br />

DISTRICT/ SCHOOL: DOBBS FERRY/SPRINGHURST ELEM.<br />

# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />

# OF STUDENTS: 125 GRADE(S) 4<br />

DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 11/9/11<br />

NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />

STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 X STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4 X<br />

ARTIST: JOURNEYS INTO AMERICAN INDIAN TER CONTRACT #: A7754<br />

TITLE OF PROGRAM: ROBERT VETTER - EASTERN WOODLAND INDIANS<br />

TYPE OF PROGRAM: ASSEMBLY/WORKSHOP<br />

DISTRICT/ SCHOOL:<br />

# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />

PELHAM/COLONIAL ELEM.<br />

# OF STUDENTS: 46 GRADE(S) 4<br />

DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 12/16/11<br />

NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />

STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 X STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4 X<br />

1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />

1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />

1.<br />

2.<br />

3.<br />

4.<br />

5.<br />

6.<br />

STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />

ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />

EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />

ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />

TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />

QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

3<br />

N/<br />

7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />

THE PRESENTERS CLEARLY KNEW THEIR CONTENT AND ENGAGED<br />

THE STUDENTS. THEIR MUSEUM SETUP WAS VERY ORGANIZED<br />

AND THEY WERE A PLEASURE TO WORK WITH.<br />

8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />

ALLOCATE MORE TIME FOR MUSEUM, LESS TIME FOR GAMES.<br />

9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />

CHILDREN CLEARLY ENJOYED THE PROGRAM.<br />

1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />

2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />

3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />

4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />

5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />

6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />

7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />

PROGRAM WAS COMPREHENSIVE, INFORMATIVE AND FUN. THE<br />

VARIETY OF ACTIVITIES ENGAGED EACH CHILD.<br />

8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />

NONE<br />

9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />

GREAT DAY. THANK YOU.<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

ARTIST: JOURNEYS INTO AMERICAN INDIAN TER CONTRACT #: A7940<br />

TITLE OF PROGRAM: ROBERT VETTER - EASTERN WOODLAND INDIANS<br />

TYPE OF PROGRAM: ASSEMBLY/WORKSHOP<br />

DISTRICT/ SCHOOL: LAKELAND/THOMAS JEFFERSON ELEM.<br />

# OF TEACHERS: 3<br />

# OF STUDENTS: 72 GRADE(S) 4<br />

DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 5/30/12<br />

NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />

STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 X STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4 X<br />

ARTIST: JOURNEYS INTO AMERICAN INDIAN TER CONTRACT #: A8843<br />

TITLE OF PROGRAM: ROBERT VETTER - EASTERN WOODLAND INDIANS<br />

TYPE OF PROGRAM: ASSEMBLY/WORKSHOP<br />

DISTRICT/ SCHOOL: HENDRICK HUDSON/FRANK G. LINDSEY ELEM.<br />

# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />

# OF STUDENTS: GRADE(S) 4<br />

DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 6/6/12<br />

NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />

STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 X STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4 X<br />

1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />

1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />

1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />

2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />

3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />

4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />

5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />

6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />

7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? ? WHY?<br />

THERE WAS A LOT OF LECTURING/COMMENTARY ABOUT<br />

INACCURATE TEXT BOOKS AND HOW TEACHERS HAD TAUGHT<br />

INACCURATE INFORMATION. WE TEACH AND ARE BOUND BY NYS<br />

GUIDELINES. VENTING TO 4TH GRADERS ABOUT GOVERNMENT IS<br />

NOT THE PROPER OR APPROPRIATE FORUM.<br />

8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />

NOT AGE APPROPRIATE AT TIMES. YOUR VIDEO WAS GRAPHIC<br />

AND DISTURBING TO SOME OF THE CHILDREN. WE DO NOT TEACH<br />

ABOUT THE HOLOCAUST IN 4TH GRADE. DID NOT KEEP STUDENTS<br />

ENGAGED AND LEFT ROOM FOR MISBEHAVIOR.<br />

9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />

WE HAD A DIFFERENT PRESENTER THIS YEAR. MUCH MORE<br />

LECTURING THEN PREVIOUS YEARS. IF WE USE AGAIN, WE WANT<br />

OUR USUAL PRESENTERS.<br />

3<br />

3<br />

3<br />

3<br />

3<br />

4<br />

1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />

2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />

3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />

4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />

5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />

6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />

7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />

THIS IS A WONDERFUL, INTERACTIVE WORKSHOPS. THE<br />

STORYTELLING WAS FANTASTIC.<br />

8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />

WEATHER PERMITTING, WE COULD MOVE SOME OF THE ACTIVITIES<br />

OUTSIDE.<br />

9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />

NONE<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

Arts in Education Service - School Evaluations <strong>2011</strong>-<strong>2012</strong><br />

Page 163 of 332


ARTIST: JOURNEYS INTO AMERICAN INDIAN TER CONTRACT #: A8611<br />

TITLE OF PROGRAM: ROBERT VETTER - EASTERN WOODLAND INDIANS<br />

TYPE OF PROGRAM: ASSEMBLY/WORKSHOP<br />

DISTRICT/ SCHOOL:<br />

# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />

PELHAM/SIWANOY ELEM.<br />

# OF STUDENTS: 48 GRADE(S) 4<br />

DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 3/13/12<br />

NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />

STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 X STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4 X<br />

ARTIST: JOURNEYS INTO AMERICAN INDIAN TER CONTRACT #: A8847<br />

TITLE OF PROGRAM: ROBERT VETTER - EASTERN WOODLAND INDIANS<br />

TYPE OF PROGRAM: ASSEMBLY/WORKSHOP<br />

DISTRICT/ SCHOOL: HENDRICK HUDSON/BUCHANAN/VERPLANCK ELEM.<br />

# OF TEACHERS: 4<br />

# OF STUDENTS: 48 GRADE(S) 4<br />

DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 6/5/12<br />

NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />

STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 X STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4 X<br />

1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />

1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />

1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />

2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />

3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />

4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />

5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />

6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />

7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />

OUTSTANDING MANAGEMENT OF THE GROUP AND EXTREMELY<br />

ENGAGING. THE MUSEUM, LONGHOURSE, GAMES AND<br />

STORYTELLING ARE INCREDIBLE.<br />

8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />

NONE<br />

9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />

WE FEEL SO LUCKY TO HAVE HAD THIS PROGRAM. THANK YOU<br />

FOR ENRICHING OUR CURRICULUM.<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

1.<br />

2.<br />

3.<br />

4.<br />

5.<br />

6.<br />

STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />

ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />

EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />

ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />

TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />

QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />

THE PROGRAM WAS VERY ENGAGING AS WELL AS THE HANDS-ON<br />

ACTIVITIES. THE PRESENTERS WERE VERY KNOWLEDGEABLE.<br />

THE STUDENTS HAD A GREAT TIME.<br />

8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />

NONE<br />

9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />

GREAT PROGRAM.<br />

ARTIST: JOURNEYS INTO AMERICAN INDIAN TER CONTRACT #: A7958<br />

TITLE OF PROGRAM: ROBERT VETTER - EASTERN WOODLAND INDIANS<br />

TYPE OF PROGRAM: ASSEMBLY/WORKSHOP<br />

DISTRICT/ SCHOOL:<br />

# OF TEACHERS: 3<br />

PELHAM/HUTCHINSON ELEM.<br />

# OF STUDENTS: 60 GRADE(S) 4<br />

DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 12/5/11<br />

NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />

STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 X STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4 X<br />

ARTIST: JOY ENGEL<br />

CONTRACT #: A8411<br />

TITLE OF PROGRAM: CINCO DE MAYO<br />

TYPE OF PROGRAM: ASSEMBLY<br />

DISTRICT/ SCHOOL: KATONAH/LEWISBORO/LEWISBORO ELEM.<br />

# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />

# OF STUDENTS: 39 GRADE(S) K<br />

DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 5/4/12<br />

NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />

STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4 X<br />

1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />

1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />

1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />

2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />

3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />

4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />

5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />

6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />

2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />

3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />

4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />

5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />

6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />

THIS PROGRAM CONTINUES TO BE A VALUABLE INTERACTIVE<br />

EXPERIENCE FOR OUR STUDENTS.<br />

8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />

NONE<br />

9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />

THE PROGRAM RAN SMOOTHLY, WAS ENGAGING TO STUDENTS<br />

AND IS ALWAYS ENTREMELY ORGANIZED.<br />

7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM?<br />

NONE<br />

8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />

NONE<br />

9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />

NONE<br />

Y<br />

WHY?<br />

Arts in Education Service - School Evaluations <strong>2011</strong>-<strong>2012</strong><br />

Page 164 of 332


ARTIST: JOY ENGEL<br />

CONTRACT #: A8799<br />

TITLE OF PROGRAM: CINCO DE MAYO<br />

TYPE OF PROGRAM: WORKSHOP<br />

DISTRICT/ SCHOOL: KATONAH/LEWISBORO/MEADOWPOND ELEM.<br />

# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />

# OF STUDENTS: 47 GRADE(S) K<br />

DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 5/5/12<br />

NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />

STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4 X<br />

ARTIST: JOY ENGEL<br />

CONTRACT #: A7869<br />

TITLE OF PROGRAM: INTRO TO NUTCRACKER<br />

TYPE OF PROGRAM: WORKSHOP<br />

DISTRICT/ SCHOOL: KATONAH/LEWISBORO/LEWISBORO ELEM.<br />

# OF TEACHERS: 2<br />

# OF STUDENTS: 72 GRADE(S) 2<br />

DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 12/6/11<br />

NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />

STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />

1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />

1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />

1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />

2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />

3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />

4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />

5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />

6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />

7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />

MS. ENGEL IS A HIGHLY QUALIFIED DANCER AND INSTRUCTOR.<br />

SHE RELATES VERY WELL TO CHILDREN.<br />

8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />

NONE<br />

9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />

HAVE TEACHERS PROVIDE NAME TAGS WITH FIRST NAMES<br />

INCLUDED IN DIRECTIONS.<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

N/<br />

1.<br />

2.<br />

3.<br />

4.<br />

5.<br />

6.<br />

STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />

ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />

EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />

ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />

TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />

QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

N/<br />

7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />

WE WOULD HIGHLY RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM. IT ENRICHES<br />

OUR LEARNING EXPERIENCE THROUGH THE ARTS AND ALLOWS<br />

THE CHILDREN TO ROLE PLAY CHARACTERS WITH COSTUMES,<br />

MUSIC, PHOTOGRAPHS, STORYTELLING AND BEHIND THE SCEENS<br />

INFORMATION.<br />

8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />

NONE<br />

9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />

JOY CONTINUES TO ENRICH OUR LEARNING WITH HER<br />

KNOWLEDGE, PROFESSIONALISM, CREATIVITY EXPERIENCE AND<br />

UNDERSTANDING OF CHILDREN AND THE ARTS.<br />

ARTIST: JOY ENGEL<br />

CONTRACT #: A7983<br />

TITLE OF PROGRAM: INTRO TO NUTCRACKER<br />

TYPE OF PROGRAM: WORKSHOP<br />

DISTRICT/ SCHOOL: KATONAH/LEWISBORO/MEADOWPOND ELEM.<br />

# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />

# OF STUDENTS: 68 GRADE(S) 2<br />

DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 12/5/11<br />

NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />

STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />

1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />

ARTIST: JOY PLAISTED<br />

CONTRACT #: A8656<br />

TITLE OF PROGRAM: HARP PLAYER FOR THE SHOW - A FUNNY THING<br />

HAPPENED ON THE WAY TO THE FORUM<br />

TYPE OF PROGRAM: ASSEMBLY<br />

DISTRICT/ SCHOOL: PUTNAM VALLEY/PUTNAM VALLEY HIGH SCHOOL<br />

# OF TEACHERS: 3<br />

# OF STUDENTS: 400 GRADE(S) 9-12<br />

DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 4/13-23/12<br />

NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />

STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />

1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />

1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />

2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />

3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />

4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />

5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />

6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />

7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />

EXCELLENT AS ALWAYS. WE LOOK FORWARD TO NEXT YEAR.<br />

8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />

NONE<br />

9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />

THE STUDENTS GAIN AN APPRECIATION OF BALLET AND THE ARTS.<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />

2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />

3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />

4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />

5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />

6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />

7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />

NONE<br />

8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />

NONE<br />

9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />

NONE<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

N/<br />

Arts in Education Service - School Evaluations <strong>2011</strong>-<strong>2012</strong><br />

Page 165 of 332


ARTIST: JOY PLAISTED<br />

CONTRACT #: A8530<br />

TITLE OF PROGRAM: HARP PLAYER FOR THE SHOW - ONCE UPON A<br />

MATTRESS<br />

TYPE OF PROGRAM: ASSEMBLY<br />

DISTRICT/ SCHOOL:<br />

# OF TEACHERS: 2<br />

SOMERS/SOMERS HIGH SCHOOL<br />

# OF STUDENTS: 50 GRADE(S) 9-12<br />

DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 3/12-18/12<br />

NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />

STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />

ARTIST: JUDITH BENJAMIN<br />

CONTRACT #: A8509<br />

TITLE OF PROGRAM: VIOLIN PLAYER FOR THE SHOW - BEAUTY AND THE<br />

BEAST<br />

TYPE OF PROGRAM: ASSEMBLY<br />

DISTRICT/ SCHOOL: PLEASANTVILLE/PLEASANTVILLE HIGH SCHOOL<br />

# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />

# OF STUDENTS: 400 GRADE(S) 9-12<br />

DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 3/9-17/12<br />

NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />

STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />

1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />

1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />

1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />

2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />

3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />

4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />

5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />

6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />

2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />

3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />

4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />

5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />

6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

N/<br />

5<br />

N/<br />

7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM?<br />

NONE<br />

Y<br />

WHY?<br />

7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y<br />

DISTRICTS AROUND SHOULD SEE THIS PRODUCTION.<br />

WHY?<br />

8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />

NONE<br />

9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />

NONE<br />

8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />

NOTHING ABSOLUTELY FANTASTIC.<br />

9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />

NONE<br />

ARTIST: JUDITH FUHRER<br />

CONTRACT #: A7815<br />

TITLE OF PROGRAM: ART & CULTURE OF YOGA<br />

TYPE OF PROGRAM: RESIDENCY<br />

DISTRICT/ SCHOOL: CHAPPAQUA/ROARING BROOK ELEM.<br />

# OF TEACHERS: 2<br />

# OF STUDENTS: 550 GRADE(S) K-4<br />

DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 10/24-11/4/11<br />

NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />

STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 X STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4 X<br />

ARTIST: JUDITH FUHRER<br />

CONTRACT #: A8809<br />

TITLE OF PROGRAM: ART & CULTURE OF YOGA<br />

TYPE OF PROGRAM: WORKSHOP<br />

DISTRICT/ SCHOOL: CHAPPAQUA/ROARING BROOK ELEM.<br />

# OF TEACHERS: 2<br />

# OF STUDENTS: 550 GRADE(S) K-4<br />

DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 4/23-5/4/12<br />

NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />

STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 X STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4 X<br />

1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />

1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />

1.<br />

2.<br />

3.<br />

4.<br />

5.<br />

6.<br />

STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />

ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />

EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />

ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />

TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />

QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />

JUDY'S PROGRAM HAS BENEFITED COUNTLESS NUMBER OF OUR<br />

STUDENTS.<br />

8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />

NONE<br />

9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />

I WISH JUDY GREAT SUCCESS WITH HER PROGRAM AND LOOK<br />

FORWARD TO SEEING HER THIS SPRING.<br />

1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />

2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />

3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />

4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />

5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />

6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />

7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />

JUDY HAS SUCH A WONDERFUL PRESENCE ABOUT HER THAT IS<br />

CONVEYED INTO HER TEACHINGS.<br />

8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />

NONE<br />

9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />

THE STUDENTS ENJOYED HER CLASS.<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

Arts in Education Service - School Evaluations <strong>2011</strong>-<strong>2012</strong><br />

Page 166 of 332


ARTIST: JULIE BAKER<br />

CONTRACT #: A8506<br />

TITLE OF PROGRAM: SCENIC DESIGNER FOR THE SHOW - GUYS & DOLLS<br />

TYPE OF PROGRAM: RESIDENCY<br />

DISTRICT/ SCHOOL: KATONAH/LEWISBORO/JOHN JAY HIGH SCHOOL<br />

# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />

# OF STUDENTS: 50 GRADE(S) 9-12<br />

DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 3/2-22/12<br />

NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />

STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 X STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />

ARTIST: JULIE PAGET<br />

CONTRACT #: A8037<br />

TITLE OF PROGRAM: SPANISH ART, CULTURE & LANGUAGE<br />

TYPE OF PROGRAM: WORKSHOP<br />

DISTRICT/ SCHOOL:<br />

# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />

CHAPPAQUA/GRAFFLIN ELEM.<br />

# OF STUDENTS: 8 GRADE(S) K & 1<br />

DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 1/11-3/21/12<br />

NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />

STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 X STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4 X<br />

1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />

1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />

1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />

2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />

3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />

4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />

5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />

6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />

2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />

3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />

4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />

5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />

6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM?<br />

NONE<br />

Y<br />

WHY?<br />

7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y<br />

EXCELLENT AND ENGAGING. STUDENTS LOVED JULIE.<br />

WHY?<br />

8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />

NONE<br />

9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />

NONE<br />

8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />

NONE<br />

9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />

NONE<br />

ARTIST: KAORO ISHIBASHI<br />

CONTRACT #: A7915<br />

TITLE OF PROGRAM: VIOLINIST SHOW<br />

TYPE OF PROGRAM: ASSEMBLY<br />

DISTRICT/ SCHOOL:<br />

# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />

HASTINGS/ALL SCHOOLS<br />

# OF STUDENTS: 150 GRADE(S) 3-12<br />

DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 11/7/11<br />

NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />

STANDARD 1 STANDARD 2 STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />

ARTIST: KAREN COLIN<br />

CONTRACT #: A8778<br />

TITLE OF PROGRAM: MODERN HARP PERFORMANCE<br />

TYPE OF PROGRAM: ASSEMBLY<br />

DISTRICT/ SCHOOL: NEW ROCHELLE/NEW ROCHELLE HS<br />

# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />

# OF STUDENTS: 310 GRADE(S) 9-12<br />

DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 5/3/12<br />

NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />

STANDARD 1 STANDARD 2 STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />

1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />

1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />

1.<br />

2.<br />

3.<br />

4.<br />

5.<br />

6.<br />

STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />

ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />

EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />

ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />

TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />

QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />

4<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />

K DEMONSTRATED A DIFFERENT WAY TO PLAY THE VIOLIN AND<br />

EXPOSED THE STUDENTS TO SOMETHING THEY MIGHT NOT HAVE<br />

EXPERIENCED.<br />

8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />

A LITTLE MORE STRUCTURE.<br />

9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />

THIS WAS A GREAT OPPORTUNITY.<br />

1.<br />

2.<br />

3.<br />

4.<br />

5.<br />

6.<br />

STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />

ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />

EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />

ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />

TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />

QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

N/<br />

7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />

PERFORMER ENGAGED THE AUDIENCE. PERFORMANCE WAS HIGH<br />

QUALITY.<br />

8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />

LESS HISTORY BACKGROUND AND MORE PERFORMANCE.<br />

9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />

NONE<br />

Arts in Education Service - School Evaluations <strong>2011</strong>-<strong>2012</strong><br />

Page 167 of 332


ARTIST: KAREN DE MAURO<br />

CONTRACT #: A8316<br />

TITLE OF PROGRAM: INTERACTIVE STORY JOURNEYS - EGYPTIAN MYTHS<br />

TYPE OF PROGRAM: WORKSHOP<br />

DISTRICT/ SCHOOL: KATONAH/LEWISBORO/JOHN JAY MIDDLE SCHOOL<br />

# OF TEACHERS: 2<br />

# OF STUDENTS: 104 GRADE(S) 6<br />

DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 2/28-3/1/12<br />

NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />

STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />

ARTIST: KAREN FREOHLICH<br />

CONTRACT #: A8578<br />

TITLE OF PROGRAM: FRENCH HORN PLAYER FOR THE SHOW - SUGAR<br />

TYPE OF PROGRAM: ASSEMBLY<br />

DISTRICT/ SCHOOL: BRIARCLIFF/BRIARCLIFF HIGH SCHOOL<br />

# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />

# OF STUDENTS: 70 GRADE(S) 9-12<br />

DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 3/4-11/12<br />

NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />

STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 STANDARD 3 STANDARD 4<br />

1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />

1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />

1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />

2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />

3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />

4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />

5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />

6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />

2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />

3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />

4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />

5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />

6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />

KAREN'S KNOWLEDGE OF ANCIENT GREECE, AS WELL AS HER<br />

ABILITY TO ENGAGE 6TH GRADERS, SERVES AS A GREAT<br />

SUPPLEMENT TO OUR STUDY OF GREECE.<br />

8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />

NONE<br />

9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />

WE HAVE BEEN WORKING WITH KAREN FOR 7 YEARS NOW. WE<br />

LOVE HOW SHE MOTIVATES OUR STUDENTS.<br />

7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />

THE INTERACTION BETWEEN STUDENTS AND PROFESSIONAL<br />

MUSICIAN WAS INVALUABLE.<br />

8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />

NONE<br />

9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />

NONE<br />

ARTIST: KAREN JACQUES<br />

CONTRACT #: A7717<br />

TITLE OF PROGRAM: TROMBONE PLAYER FOR THE SHOW - ANNIE GET<br />

YOUR GUN<br />

TYPE OF PROGRAM: ASSEMBLY<br />

DISTRICT/ SCHOOL: LAKELAND/WALTER PANAS HIGH SCHOOL<br />

# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />

# OF STUDENTS: 100 GRADE(S) 9-12<br />

DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 11/14-19/11<br />

NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />

STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />

1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />

ARTIST: KAREN JACQUES<br />

CONTRACT #: A8333<br />

TITLE OF PROGRAM: TROMBONE PLAYER FOR THE SHOW - MY FAIR LADY<br />

TYPE OF PROGRAM: ASSEMBLY<br />

DISTRICT/ SCHOOL: LAKELAND/WALTER PANAS HIGH SCHOOL<br />

# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />

# OF STUDENTS: 200 GRADE(S) 9-12<br />

DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 4/30-5/5/12<br />

NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />

STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />

1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />

1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />

2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />

3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />

4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />

5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />

6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />

7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />

GREAT WORKING WITH KAREN.<br />

8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />

NONE<br />

9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />

NONE<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />

2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />

3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />

4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />

5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />

6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />

7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />

NONE<br />

8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />

NONE<br />

9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />

NONE<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

Arts in Education Service - School Evaluations <strong>2011</strong>-<strong>2012</strong><br />

Page 168 of 332


ARTIST:<br />

KAREN KAUFMAN ORLOFF<br />

TITLE OF PROGRAM: AUTHOR VISIT<br />

TYPE OF PROGRAM: ASSEMBLY<br />

DISTRICT/ SCHOOL:<br />

BREWSTER/GARDEN STREET ELEM.<br />

CONTRACT #: A8633<br />

# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />

# OF STUDENTS: GRADE(S) K & 1<br />

DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE<br />

3/16/12<br />

NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />

STANDARD 1 STANDARD 2 STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />

1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />

1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />

2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />

3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />

4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />

5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />

6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />

7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />

THE STUDENTS LOVED HER. HER BOOKS WERE PERFECT.<br />

8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />

POSSIBLY PUTTING TOGETHER A POWERPOINT WOULD BE EASIER<br />

TO SHARE PICTURES AND BOOKS.<br />

9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />

WONDERFUL VISIT.<br />

ARTIST: KAREN ROSENTHAL-TELLER<br />

TITLE OF PROGRAM: ART & CULTURE OF YOGA<br />

TYPE OF PROGRAM: WORKSHOP<br />

DISTRICT/ SCHOOL:<br />

PELHAM/SIWANOY ELEM.<br />

CONTRACT #: A8363<br />

# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />

# OF STUDENTS: 12 GRADE(S) 3-5<br />

DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE<br />

2/3-3/29/12<br />

NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />

STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 X STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4 X<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

ARTIST:<br />

KAREN LONGWELL<br />

CONTRACT #: A7721<br />

TITLE OF PROGRAM: VOCAL COACH FOR THE SHOW - ANNIE GET YOUR<br />

GUN<br />

TYPE OF PROGRAM: RESIDENCY<br />

DISTRICT/ SCHOOL:<br />

LAKELAND/WALTER PANAS HIGH SCHOOL<br />

# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />

# OF STUDENTS: 100 GRADE(S) 9-12<br />

DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE<br />

9/26-11/19/11<br />

NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />

STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 X STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />

1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />

1.<br />

2.<br />

3.<br />

4.<br />

5.<br />

6.<br />

STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />

ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />

EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />

ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />

TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />

QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />

KAREN REALLY KNOWS HOW TO BRING OUT THE BEST OF ALL THE<br />

STUDENTS.<br />

8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />

NONE<br />

9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />

ARTIST:<br />

NONE<br />

KAREN ROSENTHAL-TELLER<br />

TITLE OF PROGRAM: ART & CULTURE OF YOGA<br />

TYPE OF PROGRAM: WORKSHOP<br />

DISTRICT/ SCHOOL:<br />

PELHAM/SIWANOY ELEM.<br />

CONTRACT #: A7645<br />

# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />

# OF STUDENTS: 10 GRADE(S) 3-5<br />

DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE<br />

10/7-12/9/11<br />

NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />

STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 X STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4 X<br />

1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />

1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />

1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />

2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />

3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />

4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />

5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />

6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />

5<br />

5<br />

4<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />

2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />

3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />

4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />

5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />

6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM?<br />

NONE<br />

Y<br />

WHY?<br />

7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM?<br />

NONE<br />

Y<br />

WHY?<br />

8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />

NONE<br />

9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />

NONE<br />

8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />

NONE<br />

9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />

NONE<br />

Arts in Education Service - School Evaluations <strong>2011</strong>-<strong>2012</strong><br />

Page 169 of 332


ARTIST:<br />

KAREN SEVELL GREENBAUM<br />

CONTRACT #: A7594C<br />

TITLE OF PROGRAM: EXPERIENTIAL LEARNING THROUGH THE ARTS: THE<br />

OTHER SIDE OF THE MIRROR: WHILE I WAS<br />

DREAMING<br />

TYPE OF PROGRAM: RESIDENCY<br />

DISTRICT/ SCHOOL:<br />

HAWTHORNE CEDAR KNOLLS/JR. & SENIOR HIGH SC<br />

# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />

# OF STUDENTS: 10 GRADE(S) 7-12<br />

DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE<br />

12/14/11-2/1/12<br />

NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />

STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />

ARTIST:<br />

KAREN SEVELL GREENBAUM<br />

CONTRACT #: A7594B<br />

TITLE OF PROGRAM: EXPERIENTIAL LEARNING THROUGH THE ARTS: THE<br />

OTHER SIDE OF THE MIRROR: WHILE I WAS<br />

DREAMING<br />

TYPE OF PROGRAM: RESIDENCY<br />

DISTRICT/ SCHOOL:<br />

HAWTHORNE CEDAR KNOLLS/JR. & SENIOR HIGH SC<br />

# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />

# OF STUDENTS: 12 GRADE(S) 7-12<br />

DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 11/10-12/8/11<br />

NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />

STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />

1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />

1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />

1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />

2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />

3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />

4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />

5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />

6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

4<br />

1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />

2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />

3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />

4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />

5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />

6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y<br />

IT HAS BEEN A GREAT ASSET TO OUR COMMUNITY.<br />

WHY?<br />

7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y<br />

LESSONS ARE WELL THOUGHT OUT AND ENGAGING.<br />

WHY?<br />

8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />

NONE<br />

9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />

NONE<br />

8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />

NONE<br />

9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />

NONE<br />

ARTIST: KAREN SEVELL GREENBAUM<br />

CONTRACT #: A7594D<br />

TITLE OF PROGRAM: EXPERIENTIAL LEARNING THROUGH THE ARTS: THE<br />

OTHER SIDE OF THE MIRROR: WHILE I WAS<br />

DREAMING<br />

TYPE OF PROGRAM: RESIDENCY<br />

DISTRICT/ SCHOOL:<br />

HAWTHORNE CEDAR KNOLLS/JR. & SENIOR HIGH SC<br />

# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />

# OF STUDENTS: 80 GRADE(S) 7-12<br />

DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE<br />

2/2-3/1/12<br />

NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />

STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />

ARTIST:<br />

KAREN SEVELL GREENBAUM<br />

CONTRACT #: A7594A<br />

TITLE OF PROGRAM: EXPERIENTIAL LEARNING THROUGH THE ARTS: THE<br />

OTHER SIDE OF THE MIRROR: WHILE I WAS<br />

DREAMING<br />

TYPE OF PROGRAM: RESIDENCY<br />

DISTRICT/ SCHOOL:<br />

HAWTHORNE CEDAR KNOLLS/JR. & SENIOR HIGH SC<br />

# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />

# OF STUDENTS: 101 GRADE(S) 7-12<br />

DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE<br />

10/26, 27, 11/2, 3 & 9/11<br />

NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />

STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />

1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />

1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />

1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />

2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />

3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />

4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />

5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />

6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />

7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />

THIS WAS A GREAT OUTLET FOR THE STUDENTS.<br />

8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />

NONE<br />

9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />

NONE<br />

4<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

1.<br />

2.<br />

3.<br />

4.<br />

5.<br />

6.<br />

STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />

ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />

EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />

ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />

TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />

QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />

THIS HAS BEEN A GREAT OPPORTUNITY FOR THE YOUNG LADIES.<br />

IT IS A GREAT OUTLET.<br />

8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />

NONE<br />

9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />

NONE<br />

Arts in Education Service - School Evaluations <strong>2011</strong>-<strong>2012</strong><br />

Page 170 of 332


ARTIST: KAREN ZAMBELLI<br />

CONTRACT #: A8022<br />

TITLE OF PROGRAM: JAZZ & TAP DANCING FOR JAZZ CO<br />

TYPE OF PROGRAM: WORKSHOP<br />

DISTRICT/ SCHOOL: TUCKAHOE/TUCKAHOE HIGH SCHOOL<br />

# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />

# OF STUDENTS: 60 GRADE(S) 9-12<br />

DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 11/28/11-3/3/12<br />

NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />

STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 X STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4 X<br />

ARTIST: KAREN ZAMBELLI<br />

CONTRACT #: A7858A<br />

TITLE OF PROGRAM: TAP & JAZZ DANCING<br />

TYPE OF PROGRAM: RESIDENCY<br />

DISTRICT/ SCHOOL: EASTCHESTER/EASTCHESTER HIGH SCHOOL<br />

# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />

# OF STUDENTS: 30 GRADE(S) 9-12<br />

DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 10/31/11-1/23/12<br />

NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />

STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 X STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4 X<br />

1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />

1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />

1.<br />

2.<br />

3.<br />

4.<br />

5.<br />

6.<br />

STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />

ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />

EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />

ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />

TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />

QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

N/<br />

7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />

DANCE IS CULTURAL, ARTISTIC, EDUCATIONAL ACTIVE AND FUN.<br />

8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />

NONE.<br />

9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />

TALENTED, ORGANIZED AND GREAT PERSON.<br />

1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />

2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />

3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />

4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />

5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />

6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />

7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />

NONE<br />

8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />

NONE<br />

9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />

KAREN BRINGS HER EXPERTISE TO THE PROGRAM WHICH<br />

HEIGHTENS THE QUALITY OF OUR CONTENT. SHE IS TRULY<br />

AMAZING.<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

ARTIST: KAREN ZAMBELLI<br />

CONTRACT #: A7858B<br />

TITLE OF PROGRAM: THEATRE DANCES<br />

TYPE OF PROGRAM: RESIDENCY<br />

DISTRICT/ SCHOOL: EASTCHESTER/EASTCHESTER HIGH SCHOOL<br />

# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />

# OF STUDENTS: 30 GRADE(S) 9-12<br />

DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 11/1/11-1/17/12<br />

NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />

STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 X STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />

ARTIST: KARIN REETZ<br />

CONTRACT #: A8794<br />

TITLE OF PROGRAM: LETS MAKE BOOKS<br />

TYPE OF PROGRAM: WORKSHOP<br />

DISTRICT/ SCHOOL: NEW ROCHELLE/TRINITY ELEM. SCHOOL<br />

# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />

# OF STUDENTS: 175 GRADE(S) 5<br />

DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 5/30-6/14/12<br />

NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />

STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 X STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />

1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />

1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />

1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />

2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />

3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />

4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />

5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />

6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />

2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />

3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />

4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />

5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />

6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

N/<br />

7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM?<br />

NONE<br />

Y<br />

WHY?<br />

7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM?<br />

KARIN IS ORGANIZED AND KNOWLEDGEABLE.<br />

Y<br />

WHY?<br />

8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />

NONE<br />

9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />

KAREN BRINGS HER EXPERTISE TO THE PROGRAM WHICH<br />

HEIGHTENS THE QUALITY OF OUR CONTENT. SHE IS TRULY<br />

AMAZING.<br />

8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />

NONE<br />

9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />

NONE<br />

Arts in Education Service - School Evaluations <strong>2011</strong>-<strong>2012</strong><br />

Page 171 of 332


ARTIST: KARNE LONGWELL<br />

CONTRACT #: A8320<br />

TITLE OF PROGRAM: VOCAL COACH FOR THE SHOW - MY FAIR LADY<br />

TYPE OF PROGRAM: RESIDENCY<br />

DISTRICT/ SCHOOL: LAKELAND/WALTER PANAS HIGH SCHOOL<br />

# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />

# OF STUDENTS: 200 GRADE(S) 9-12<br />

DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 2/21-5/5/12<br />

NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />

STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 X STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />

1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />

ARTIST: KATE DeMAGISTRIS CONTRACT #: A-7988<br />

TITLE OF PROGRAM: KEYBOARD PLAYER FOR THE SHOW - THE DROWSY<br />

CHAPERONE<br />

TYPE OF PROGRAM: ASSEMBLY<br />

DISTRICT/ SCHOOL: CHAPPAQUA/HORACE GREELEY HIGH SCHOOL<br />

# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />

# OF STUDENTS: 35 GRADE(S) 9-12<br />

DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 11/17-19/11<br />

NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />

STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />

1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />

1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />

2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />

3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />

4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />

5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />

6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />

7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />

NONE<br />

8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />

NONE<br />

9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />

NONE<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />

2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />

3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />

4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />

5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />

6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />

7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />

EXCELLENT, FLAWLESS SHOW AND MUSICAL DIRECTION. KATE<br />

WAS A GREAT ADDITION TO OUR ORCHESTRA.<br />

8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />

NONE<br />

9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />

COULDN'T BE MORE PROFESSIONAL. VERY IMPRESSIVE THEATER<br />

PROGRAM.<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

ARTIST: KATE VANTUCCI<br />

CONTRACT #: A8687<br />

TITLE OF PROGRAM: ART & CULTURE OF YOGA<br />

TYPE OF PROGRAM: RESIDENCY<br />

DISTRICT/ SCHOOL: NEW ROCHELLE/TRINITY ELEM. SCHOOL<br />

# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />

# OF STUDENTS: 150 GRADE(S) 2<br />

DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 4/2-5/4/12<br />

NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />

STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 X STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4 X<br />

1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />

ARTIST: KATHI ANNE APPELT<br />

CONTRACT #: A7828<br />

TITLE OF PROGRAM: AUTHOR VISIT - BATS IN MY BELFRY OR HOW A<br />

BOOK COMES TO BE<br />

TYPE OF PROGRAM: ASSEMBLY<br />

DISTRICT/ SCHOOL:<br />

# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />

BRIARCLIFF/TODD ELEM.<br />

# OF STUDENTS: 310 GRADE(S) K-2<br />

DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 10/27/11<br />

NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />

STANDARD 1 STANDARD 2 STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />

1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />

1.<br />

2.<br />

3.<br />

4.<br />

5.<br />

6.<br />

STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />

ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />

EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />

ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />

TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />

QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

N/<br />

7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />

KATE WAS WELL ORGANIZED, ENERGETIC AND KNOWLEDGEABLE.<br />

8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />

NONE<br />

9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />

NONE<br />

1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />

2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />

3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />

4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />

5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />

6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />

7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />

KATHI DOES AN GREAT JOB TALKING ABOUT WRITING, GIVING<br />

WRITING TIPS AND INSPIRING STUDENTS TO WRITE.<br />

8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />

NONE<br />

9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />

WE ARE GLAD SHE COME TO OUR SCHOOL.<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

Arts in Education Service - School Evaluations <strong>2011</strong>-<strong>2012</strong><br />

Page 172 of 332


ARTIST: KATHLEEN BART<br />

CONTRACT #: A8325<br />

TITLE OF PROGRAM: AUTHOR VISIT - GLOBAL CULTURES<br />

TYPE OF PROGRAM: ASSEMBLY<br />

DISTRICT/ SCHOOL: EASTCHESTER/ANNE HUTCHINSON ELEM.<br />

# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />

# OF STUDENTS: 125 GRADE(S) 3<br />

DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 1/23/12<br />

NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />

STANDARD 1 STANDARD 2 STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4 X<br />

ARTIST: KATHLEEN BART<br />

CONTRACT #: A7564B<br />

TITLE OF PROGRAM: AUTHOR VISIT - GLOBAL CULTURES<br />

TYPE OF PROGRAM: ASSEMBLY<br />

DISTRICT/ SCHOOL: EASTCHESTER/GREENVALE ELEM.<br />

# OF TEACHERS: 6<br />

# OF STUDENTS: 141 GRADE(S) 3<br />

DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 4/3/12<br />

NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />

STANDARD 1 STANDARD 2 STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4 X<br />

1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />

1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />

1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />

2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />

3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />

4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />

5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />

6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />

2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />

3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />

4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />

5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />

6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />

KATHLEEN IS VERY ENGAGING AND SPARKED A GENUINE<br />

INTEREST IN A VARIETY OF WORLD CULTURES.<br />

8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />

WE WOULD LOVE TO HAVE THE GLOBAL CULTURES ASSEMBLY<br />

FOLLOWED UP WITH A RELATED WRITER'S WORKSHOP.<br />

9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />

NONE<br />

7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />

MS. BART KEPT THE CHILDREN'S INTEREST THROUGHOUT THE<br />

PROGRAM AND WAS ABLE TO COMMUNICATE DIFFERENT<br />

CULTURES IN AN EFFECTIVE MANNER. THE STUDENTS AND<br />

TEACHERS THROUGHLY ENJOYED HER PRESENTATION.<br />

8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />

NONE<br />

9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />

NONE<br />

ARTIST: KATHLEEN BART<br />

CONTRACT #: A7564A<br />

TITLE OF PROGRAM: AUTHOR VISIT - TEDDY BEAR WRITER'S WORKSHOPS<br />

TYPE OF PROGRAM: RESIDENCY<br />

DISTRICT/ SCHOOL: EASTCHESTER/GREENVALE ELEM.<br />

# OF TEACHERS: 3<br />

# OF STUDENTS: 152 GRADE(S) 2<br />

DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 10/27 & 28/11<br />

NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />

STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 X STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />

ARTIST: KATHLEEN BART<br />

CONTRACT #: A8733<br />

TITLE OF PROGRAM: AUTHOR VISIT - TEDDY BEAR WRITING & DRAWING<br />

TYPE OF PROGRAM: ASSEMBLY/WORKSHOP<br />

DISTRICT/ SCHOOL: EASTCHESTER/ANNE HUTCHINSON ELEM.<br />

# OF TEACHERS: 5<br />

# OF STUDENTS: 24 GRADE(S) 2<br />

DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 3/26 & 27/12<br />

NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />

STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 X STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />

1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />

1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />

1.<br />

2.<br />

3.<br />

4.<br />

5.<br />

6.<br />

STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />

ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />

EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />

ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />

TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />

QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />

EXCELLENT PROGRAM. SHE WAS INTERACTIVE WITH CHILDREN.<br />

GOOD VISUALS. GREAT SOUND SYSTEM.<br />

8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />

NONE<br />

9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />

NONE<br />

1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />

2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />

3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />

4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />

5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />

6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />

7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />

NONE<br />

8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />

NONE<br />

9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />

NONE<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

Arts in Education Service - School Evaluations <strong>2011</strong>-<strong>2012</strong><br />

Page 173 of 332


ARTIST: KATHLEEN FAY<br />

CONTRACT #: A8759<br />

TITLE OF PROGRAM: SCULPEY & MOSAICS<br />

TYPE OF PROGRAM: WORKSHOP<br />

DISTRICT/ SCHOOL: KATONAH/LEWISBORO/LEWISBORO ELEM.<br />

# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />

# OF STUDENTS: 12 GRADE(S) 3-5<br />

DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 4/25-5/30/12<br />

NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />

STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 X STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />

ARTIST: KATHLEEN FAY<br />

CONTRACT #: A8298<br />

TITLE OF PROGRAM: SET DESIGNER FOR THE SHOW<br />

TYPE OF PROGRAM: RESIDENCY<br />

DISTRICT/ SCHOOL: KATONAH/LEWISBORO/LEWISBORO ELEM.<br />

# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />

# OF STUDENTS: GRADE(S) 4 & 5<br />

DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 1/19-3/29/12<br />

NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />

STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 X STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />

1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />

1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />

1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />

2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />

3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />

4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />

5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />

6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />

2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />

3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />

4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />

5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />

6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />

VERY CREATIVE AND CHILDREN ALL SEEMED TO ENJOY IT.<br />

8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />

NONE<br />

9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />

NONE<br />

7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />

KATHLEEN WAS VERY COMMITTED TO CREATE AN ATTRACTIVE<br />

SET AND INVOLVED THE STUDENTS AS MUCH AS SHE COULD.<br />

8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />

PLAN AHEAD WHICH I KNOW IS HARD TO DO.<br />

9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />

IT LOOKED GREAT AND THE CHILDREN OUTDID THEMSELVES<br />

AGAIN.<br />

ARTIST: KATHLEEN MAHAN<br />

CONTRACT #: A8545<br />

TITLE OF PROGRAM: WRITING AND PERFORMING STAGE TO PAGE<br />

SCHOOL MEMORIES SHOW<br />

TYPE OF PROGRAM: RESIDENCY<br />

DISTRICT/ SCHOOL:<br />

# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />

PELHAM/PROSPECT HILL ELEM.<br />

# OF STUDENTS: 58 GRADE(S) 5<br />

DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 4/2-6/5/12<br />

NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />

STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 X STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />

ARTIST: KATHLEEN MAHAN<br />

CONTRACT #: A8868<br />

TITLE OF PROGRAM: WRITING AND PERFORMING STAGE TO PAGE<br />

SCHOOL MEMORIES SHOW<br />

TYPE OF PROGRAM: RESIDENCY<br />

DISTRICT/ SCHOOL:<br />

# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />

PELHAM/SIWANOY ELEM.<br />

# OF STUDENTS: 40 GRADE(S) 5<br />

DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 5/21-6/12/12<br />

NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />

STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 X STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />

1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />

1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />

1.<br />

2.<br />

3.<br />

4.<br />

5.<br />

6.<br />

STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />

ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />

EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />

ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />

TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />

QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />

KATHLEEN IS VERY TALENTED. SHE WORKS WONDERFULLY WITH<br />

THE CHILDREN AND WROTE UP A SCRIPT THAT WAS EXCEPTIONAL.<br />

8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />

WE WERE VERY SATISFIED.<br />

9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />

I CAN'T WAIT UNTIL NEXT YEAR.<br />

1.<br />

2.<br />

3.<br />

4.<br />

5.<br />

6.<br />

STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />

ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />

EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />

ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />

TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />

QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

4<br />

N/<br />

7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />

THE STUDENTS WERE ENGAGED, ABLE TO EXPRESS THEIR IDEAS<br />

THROUGH THE ARTS AND LEARNED ABOUT THEATRE.<br />

8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />

NONE<br />

9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />

NONE<br />

Arts in Education Service - School Evaluations <strong>2011</strong>-<strong>2012</strong><br />

Page 174 of 332


ARTIST: KATHLEEN NESI<br />

CONTRACT #: A8056<br />

TITLE OF PROGRAM: MAKING ARTIST TRADING CARDS<br />

TYPE OF PROGRAM: WORKSHOP<br />

DISTRICT/ SCHOOL:<br />

# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />

PELHAM/PROSPECT HILL ELEM.<br />

# OF STUDENTS: 11 GRADE(S) 3-5<br />

DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 1/11-3/7/12<br />

NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />

STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 X STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />

ARTIST: KATHLEEN SARTOR dba SIRIUS COYOT CONTRACT #: A8487<br />

TITLE OF PROGRAM: INTERACTIVE CONCERT<br />

TYPE OF PROGRAM: ASSEMBLY<br />

DISTRICT/ SCHOOL: IRVINGTON/MAIN STREET SCHOOL<br />

# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />

# OF STUDENTS: 120 GRADE(S) 5<br />

DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 3/16/12<br />

NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />

STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4 X<br />

1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />

1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />

1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />

2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />

3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />

4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />

5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />

6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

N/<br />

1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />

2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />

3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />

4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />

5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />

6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM?<br />

NONE<br />

Y<br />

WHY?<br />

7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />

STUDENTS WERE ENGAGED DURING THE ENTIRE ASSEMBLY.<br />

8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />

NONE<br />

9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />

NONE<br />

8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />

NONE<br />

9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />

NONE<br />

ARTIST: KATHLEEN SARTOR dba SIRIUS COYOT CONTRACT #: A8214<br />

TITLE OF PROGRAM: ROOTS OF LATIN AMERICAN MUSIC & CULTURE<br />

TYPE OF PROGRAM: ASSEMBLY<br />

DISTRICT/ SCHOOL: PUTNAM VALLEY/PUTNAM VALLEY MIDDLE SCHOOL<br />

# OF TEACHERS: 3<br />

# OF STUDENTS: 150 GRADE(S) 5<br />

DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 5/8/12<br />

NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />

STANDARD 1 STANDARD 2 STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4 X<br />

ARTIST: KATONAH ART CENTER<br />

CONTRACT #: A8115C<br />

TITLE OF PROGRAM: ARLENE ESTEVEZ - ANIMAL CRAFTS<br />

TYPE OF PROGRAM: WORKSHOP<br />

DISTRICT/ SCHOOL: CHAPPAQUA/WESTORCHARD ELEM.<br />

# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />

# OF STUDENTS: 9 GRADE(S) K-2<br />

DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 1/12-3/8/12<br />

NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />

STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 X STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />

1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />

1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />

1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />

2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />

3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />

4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />

5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />

6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

N/<br />

1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />

2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />

3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />

4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />

5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />

6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

N/<br />

5<br />

7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />

THIS FITS IN PERFECTLY WITH OUR CURRICULUM. STUDENTS<br />

WERE ENGAGED 100% OF THE TIME.<br />

8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />

NONE<br />

9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />

NONE<br />

7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM?<br />

NONE<br />

8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />

NONE<br />

9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />

NONE<br />

Y<br />

WHY?<br />

Arts in Education Service - School Evaluations <strong>2011</strong>-<strong>2012</strong><br />

Page 175 of 332


ARTIST: KATONAH ART CENTER<br />

CONTRACT #: A8202<br />

TITLE OF PROGRAM: CHARLENE ANDERSEN - JEWELRY MAKING<br />

TYPE OF PROGRAM: WORKSHOP<br />

DISTRICT/ SCHOOL: CHAPPAQUA/ROARING BROOK ELEM.<br />

# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />

# OF STUDENTS: 10 GRADE(S) 3 & 4<br />

DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 1/13-3/9/12<br />

NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />

STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 X STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />

ARTIST: KATONAH ART CENTER<br />

CONTRACT #: A8116<br />

TITLE OF PROGRAM: CHARLENE ANDERSON - CAMP ARTS & CRAFTS<br />

TYPE OF PROGRAM: WORKSHOP<br />

DISTRICT/ SCHOOL:<br />

# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />

CHAPPAQUA/GRAFFLIN ELEM.<br />

# OF STUDENTS: 7 GRADE(S) K-2<br />

DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 1/12-3/8/12<br />

NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />

STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 X STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />

1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />

1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />

1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />

2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />

3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />

4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />

5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />

6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

N/<br />

1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />

2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />

3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />

4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />

5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />

6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />

3<br />

3<br />

3<br />

3<br />

3<br />

3<br />

7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y<br />

STUDENTS WERE VERY PLEASE WITH THE CLASS.<br />

WHY?<br />

7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM?<br />

NONE<br />

Y<br />

WHY?<br />

8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />

NONE<br />

9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />

WE MAY MAKE THE CLASS SMALLER NEXT YEAR.<br />

8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />

NONE<br />

9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />

NONE<br />

ARTIST: KATONAH ART CENTER<br />

CONTRACT #: A8116<br />

TITLE OF PROGRAM: CHARLENE ANDERSON - INTRO TO SEWING<br />

TYPE OF PROGRAM: WORKSHOP<br />

DISTRICT/ SCHOOL:<br />

# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />

CHAPPAQUA/GRAFFLIN ELEM.<br />

# OF STUDENTS: 11 GRADE(S) 2-4<br />

DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 1/11-3/21/12<br />

NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />

STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 X STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />

ARTIST: KATONAH ART CENTER<br />

CONTRACT #: A7507<br />

TITLE OF PROGRAM: CHARLENE ANDERSON - JEWELRY MAKING<br />

TYPE OF PROGRAM: WORKSHOP<br />

DISTRICT/ SCHOOL: KATONAH/LEWISBORO/INCREASE MILLER ELEM.<br />

# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />

# OF STUDENTS: 7 GRADE(S) 1-3<br />

DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 10/5-12/7/12<br />

NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />

STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 X STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />

1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />

1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />

1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />

2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />

3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />

4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />

5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />

6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />

4<br />

4<br />

3<br />

2<br />

3<br />

3<br />

1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />

2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />

3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />

4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />

5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />

6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

N/<br />

N/<br />

7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM?<br />

NONE<br />

8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />

FEWER STUDENTS IN CLASS. CONSIDER AN ASSISTANT.<br />

9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />

NONE<br />

Y<br />

WHY?<br />

7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />

AS ALWAYS, CHARLENE IS A DELIGHT. THE STUDENTS LOVE<br />

LEARNING FROM HER.<br />

8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />

NONE<br />

9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />

NONE<br />

Arts in Education Service - School Evaluations <strong>2011</strong>-<strong>2012</strong><br />

Page 176 of 332


ARTIST: KATONAH ART CENTER<br />

CONTRACT #: A7729A<br />

TITLE OF PROGRAM: CHARLENE ANDERSON - WIZARD CRAFTS<br />

TYPE OF PROGRAM: WORKSHOP<br />

DISTRICT/ SCHOOL: KATONAH/LEWISBORO/LEWISBORO ELEM.<br />

# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />

# OF STUDENTS: GRADE(S) 3-5<br />

DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 10/17-12/5/11<br />

NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />

STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 X STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />

ARTIST: KATONAH ART CENTER<br />

CONTRACT #: A8116<br />

TITLE OF PROGRAM: DONNA FERREIRO - JEWELRY MAKING<br />

TYPE OF PROGRAM: WORKSHOP<br />

DISTRICT/ SCHOOL:<br />

# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />

CHAPPAQUA/GRAFFLIN ELEM.<br />

# OF STUDENTS: 11 GRADE(S) K-2<br />

DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 1/10-3/6/12<br />

NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />

STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 X STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />

1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />

1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />

1.<br />

2.<br />

3.<br />

4.<br />

5.<br />

6.<br />

STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />

ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />

EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />

ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />

TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />

QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />

4<br />

4<br />

4<br />

4<br />

4<br />

5<br />

7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />

THE CHILDREN SEEM TO HAVE FUN AND COME HOME WITH GREAT<br />

THINGS EVERY WEEK.<br />

8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />

NONE<br />

9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />

NONE<br />

1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />

2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />

3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />

4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />

5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />

6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />

7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />

NONE<br />

8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />

NONE<br />

9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />

NONE<br />

3<br />

3<br />

3<br />

3<br />

3<br />

3<br />

ARTIST: KATONAH ART CENTER<br />

CONTRACT #: A8116<br />

TITLE OF PROGRAM: FRANCHE CARLSON - FAIRY WORLD CRAFTS<br />

TYPE OF PROGRAM: WORKSHOP<br />

DISTRICT/ SCHOOL:<br />

# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />

CHAPPAQUA/GRAFFLIN ELEM.<br />

# OF STUDENTS: 11 GRADE(S) K-2<br />

DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 1/9-3/12/12<br />

NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />

STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 X STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />

ARTIST: KATONAH ART CENTER<br />

CONTRACT #: A8202<br />

TITLE OF PROGRAM: FRANCHE CARLSON - SEWING<br />

TYPE OF PROGRAM: WORKSHOP<br />

DISTRICT/ SCHOOL: CHAPPAQUA/ROARING BROOK ELEM.<br />

# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />

# OF STUDENTS: 10 GRADE(S) 2-4<br />

DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 1/11-2/29/12<br />

NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />

STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 X STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />

1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />

1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />

1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />

2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />

3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />

4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />

5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />

6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />

3<br />

3<br />

3<br />

3<br />

3<br />

3<br />

1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />

2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />

3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />

4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />

5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />

6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />

4<br />

4<br />

5<br />

4<br />

4<br />

N/<br />

7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM?<br />

NONE<br />

Y<br />

WHY?<br />

7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM?<br />

TALENTED INSTRUCTOR.<br />

Y<br />

WHY?<br />

8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />

NONE<br />

9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />

NONE<br />

8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />

NONE<br />

9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />

NONE<br />

Arts in Education Service - School Evaluations <strong>2011</strong>-<strong>2012</strong><br />

Page 177 of 332


ARTIST: KATONAH ART CENTER<br />

CONTRACT #: A8116<br />

TITLE OF PROGRAM: JANICE NOTO HELMERS - SCRAPBOOKING<br />

TYPE OF PROGRAM: WORKSHOP<br />

DISTRICT/ SCHOOL:<br />

# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />

CHAPPAQUA/GRAFFLIN ELEM.<br />

# OF STUDENTS: 9 GRADE(S) 2-4<br />

DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 1/12-3/8/12<br />

NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />

STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 X STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />

ARTIST: KATONAH ART CENTER<br />

CONTRACT #: A7589<br />

TITLE OF PROGRAM: JENNY CRAIG - MOSAICS<br />

TYPE OF PROGRAM: WORKSHOP<br />

DISTRICT/ SCHOOL: KATONAH/LEWISBORO/KATONAH ELEM. SCHOOL<br />

# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />

# OF STUDENTS: 8 GRADE(S) 1-4<br />

DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 10/6-12/1/11<br />

NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />

STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 X STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />

1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />

1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />

1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />

2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />

3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />

4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />

5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />

6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />

4<br />

4<br />

4<br />

4<br />

3<br />

4<br />

1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />

2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />

3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />

4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />

5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />

6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />

4<br />

4<br />

4<br />

4<br />

4<br />

4<br />

7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM?<br />

NONE<br />

Y<br />

WHY?<br />

7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM?<br />

NONE<br />

Y<br />

WHY?<br />

8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />

NONE<br />

9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />

NONE<br />

8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />

NONE<br />

9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />

NONE<br />

ARTIST: KATONAH ART CENTER<br />

CONTRACT #: A8115B<br />

TITLE OF PROGRAM: JULIA ZAREMBA - ARTS & CRAFTS<br />

TYPE OF PROGRAM: WORKSHOP<br />

DISTRICT/ SCHOOL: CHAPPAQUA/WESTORCHARD ELEM.<br />

# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />

# OF STUDENTS: 11 GRADE(S) K-2<br />

DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 1/11-3/8/12<br />

NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />

STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 X STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />

ARTIST: KATONAH ART CENTER<br />

CONTRACT #: A8116<br />

TITLE OF PROGRAM: KATHERINE HURTZDO - ANIMAL ARTS & CRAFTS<br />

TYPE OF PROGRAM: WORKSHOP<br />

DISTRICT/ SCHOOL:<br />

# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />

CHAPPAQUA/GRAFFLIN ELEM.<br />

# OF STUDENTS: 7 GRADE(S) 3 & 4<br />

DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 1/13-3/9/12<br />

NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />

STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 X STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />

1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />

1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />

1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />

2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />

3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />

4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />

5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />

6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />

2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />

3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />

4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />

5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />

6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />

3<br />

3<br />

3<br />

3<br />

3<br />

3<br />

7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM?<br />

GREAT CLASS.<br />

Y<br />

WHY?<br />

7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM?<br />

NONE<br />

Y<br />

WHY?<br />

8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />

NONE<br />

9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />

NONE<br />

8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />

NONE<br />

9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />

NONE<br />

Arts in Education Service - School Evaluations <strong>2011</strong>-<strong>2012</strong><br />

Page 178 of 332


ARTIST: KATONAH ART CENTER<br />

CONTRACT #: A8202<br />

TITLE OF PROGRAM: KATHLEEN FAY - FAIRYWORLD ARTS & CRAFTS<br />

TYPE OF PROGRAM: WORKSHOP<br />

DISTRICT/ SCHOOL: CHAPPAQUA/ROARING BROOK ELEM.<br />

# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />

# OF STUDENTS: 12 GRADE(S) K-2<br />

DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 1/10-3/6/12<br />

NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />

STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 X STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />

ARTIST: KATONAH ART CENTER<br />

CONTRACT #: A8281B<br />

TITLE OF PROGRAM: MARY PICKWELL - FAIRY CRAFT<br />

TYPE OF PROGRAM: WORKSHOP<br />

DISTRICT/ SCHOOL: KATONAH/LEWISBORO/KATONAH ELEM. SCHOOL<br />

# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />

# OF STUDENTS: 9 GRADE(S) K-2<br />

DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 1/20-3/16/12<br />

NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />

STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 X STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />

1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />

1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />

1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />

2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />

3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />

4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />

5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />

6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />

4<br />

5<br />

4<br />

4<br />

4<br />

N/<br />

1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />

2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />

3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />

4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />

5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />

6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />

3<br />

3<br />

3<br />

3<br />

3<br />

3<br />

7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y<br />

THE STUDENTS REALLY ENJOYED THE PROGRAM.<br />

WHY?<br />

7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM?<br />

GOOD ENOUGH CLASS.<br />

Y<br />

WHY?<br />

8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />

NONE<br />

9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />

WE HAD A LOT OF ROOM CHANGES THIS YEAR SO WE NEED<br />

FLEXIBILITY.<br />

8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />

NONE<br />

9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />

NONE<br />

ARTIST: KATONAH ART CENTER<br />

CONTRACT #: A8281A<br />

TITLE OF PROGRAM: MARY PICKWELL - WIZARD CRAFTS<br />

TYPE OF PROGRAM: WORKSHOP<br />

DISTRICT/ SCHOOL: KATONAH/LEWISBORO/KATONAH ELEM. SCHOOL<br />

# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />

# OF STUDENTS: 7 GRADE(S) 1-4<br />

DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 1/17-3/13/12<br />

NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />

STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 X STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />

ARTIST: KATONAH ART CENTER<br />

CONTRACT #: A8115A<br />

TITLE OF PROGRAM: MARY PLATT - BEASTMASTER CRAFTS<br />

TYPE OF PROGRAM: WORKSHOP<br />

DISTRICT/ SCHOOL: CHAPPAQUA/WESTORCHARD ELEM.<br />

# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />

# OF STUDENTS: 7 GRADE(S) K-2<br />

DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 1/9-3/5/12<br />

NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />

STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 X STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />

1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />

1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />

1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />

2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />

3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />

4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />

5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />

6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />

1<br />

2<br />

2<br />

1<br />

2<br />

1<br />

1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />

2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />

3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />

4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />

5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />

6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

N/<br />

7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM?<br />

NOT A GOOD FIT WITH OUR STUDENTS.<br />

N<br />

WHY?<br />

7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM?<br />

NONE<br />

Y<br />

WHY?<br />

8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />

NONE<br />

9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />

NONE<br />

8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />

NONE<br />

9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />

NONE<br />

Arts in Education Service - School Evaluations <strong>2011</strong>-<strong>2012</strong><br />

Page 179 of 332


ARTIST: KATONAH ART CENTER<br />

CONTRACT #: A8202<br />

TITLE OF PROGRAM: MARY PLATT - CAMP CRAFTS<br />

TYPE OF PROGRAM: WORKSHOP<br />

DISTRICT/ SCHOOL: CHAPPAQUA/ROARING BROOK ELEM.<br />

# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />

# OF STUDENTS: 13 GRADE(S) K-2<br />

DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 1/11-2/29/12<br />

NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />

STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 X STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />

ARTIST: KATONAH ART CENTER<br />

CONTRACT #: A8202<br />

TITLE OF PROGRAM: QUINCY EGGINTON - EARTHWORKS<br />

TYPE OF PROGRAM: WORKSHOP<br />

DISTRICT/ SCHOOL: CHAPPAQUA/ROARING BROOK ELEM.<br />

# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />

# OF STUDENTS: 12 GRADE(S) K-2<br />

DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 1/13-3/9/12<br />

NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />

STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 X STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />

1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />

1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />

1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />

2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />

3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />

4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />

5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />

6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />

4<br />

4<br />

5<br />

4<br />

N/<br />

N/<br />

1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />

2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />

3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />

4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />

5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />

6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />

4<br />

4<br />

4<br />

4<br />

4<br />

N/<br />

7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM?<br />

KAC ALWAYS HAS GREAT STAFF.<br />

Y<br />

WHY?<br />

7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM?<br />

QUINCY GAVE A GREAT CLASS.<br />

Y<br />

WHY?<br />

8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />

NONE<br />

9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />

NONE<br />

8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />

TRY TO BE FLEXIBLE WITH CHANGES IN ROOMS.<br />

9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />

NONE<br />

ARTIST: KATONAH ART CENTER<br />

CONTRACT #: A8202<br />

TITLE OF PROGRAM: SARAH GLICKMAN - MOSAICS<br />

TYPE OF PROGRAM: WORKSHOP<br />

DISTRICT/ SCHOOL: CHAPPAQUA/ROARING BROOK ELEM.<br />

# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />

# OF STUDENTS: 9 GRADE(S) 3 & 4<br />

DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 1/12-3/8/12<br />

NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />

STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 X STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />

ARTIST: KATONAH ART CENTER<br />

CONTRACT #: A8116<br />

TITLE OF PROGRAM: SARAH GLICKMAN - MOSAICS<br />

TYPE OF PROGRAM: WORKSHOP<br />

DISTRICT/ SCHOOL:<br />

# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />

CHAPPAQUA/GRAFFLIN ELEM.<br />

# OF STUDENTS: 9 GRADE(S) 2-4<br />

DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 1/9-3/12/12<br />

NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />

STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 X STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />

1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />

1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />

1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />

2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />

3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />

4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />

5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />

6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />

4<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

4<br />

N/<br />

1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />

2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />

3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />

4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />

5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />

6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />

3<br />

3<br />

3<br />

3<br />

3<br />

3<br />

7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM?<br />

SARAH WAS A WONDERFUL INSTRUCTOR.<br />

Y<br />

WHY?<br />

7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM?<br />

NONE<br />

Y<br />

WHY?<br />

8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />

NONE<br />

9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />

NONE<br />

8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />

NONE<br />

9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />

NONE<br />

Arts in Education Service - School Evaluations <strong>2011</strong>-<strong>2012</strong><br />

Page 180 of 332


ARTIST: KATYA GRINEVA<br />

CONTRACT #: A8323<br />

TITLE OF PROGRAM: PIANIST PERFORMANCE - CLASSICAL MUSIC FOR<br />

CHILDREN<br />

TYPE OF PROGRAM: ASSEMBLY<br />

DISTRICT/ SCHOOL:<br />

# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />

TUCKAHOE/W. E. COTTLE ELEM.<br />

# OF STUDENTS: GRADE(S) 3-5<br />

DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 2/11/12<br />

NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />

STANDARD 1 STANDARD 2 STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />

1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />

ARTIST: KAZUKO OMORI<br />

CONTRACT #: A8224<br />

TITLE OF PROGRAM: DISCOVER JAPAN THROUGH ART<br />

TYPE OF PROGRAM: WORKSHOP<br />

DISTRICT/ SCHOOL: LAKELAND/COPPER BEECH MIDDLE SCHOOL<br />

# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />

# OF STUDENTS: 120 GRADE(S) 6 & 7<br />

DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 3/26-30/12<br />

NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />

STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 X STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4 X<br />

1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />

1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />

2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />

3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />

4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />

5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />

6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />

7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />

SHE IS A WORLD CLASS PIANIST.<br />

8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />

NONE<br />

9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />

NONE<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

1.<br />

2.<br />

3.<br />

4.<br />

5.<br />

6.<br />

STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />

ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />

EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />

ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />

TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />

QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />

STUDENTS LEARNED TRADITIONAL JAPANESE GREETINGS,<br />

NUMBERS AND FOLK STORIES. THEY CREATED ORIGAMI AND<br />

WERE COMPLETELY ENGAGED. SOME CLASSES LEARNED<br />

JAPANESE CALLIGRAPHY. AN AMAZING CULTURAL EXPERIENCE.<br />

8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />

NONE<br />

9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />

I HIGHLY RECOMMEND HER FOR ANY CULTURE ENRICHMENT.<br />

ARTIST: KAZUKO OMORI<br />

CONTRACT #: A8819<br />

TITLE OF PROGRAM: JAPANESE CALLIGRAPHY & KIRIGAMI<br />

TYPE OF PROGRAM: WORKSHOP<br />

DISTRICT/ SCHOOL:<br />

# OF TEACHERS: 3<br />

PELHAM/SIWANOY ELEM.<br />

# OF STUDENTS: 58 GRADE(S) 3<br />

DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 5/16-18/12<br />

NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />

STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 X STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4 X<br />

ARTIST: KAZUKO OMORI<br />

CONTRACT #: A7618<br />

TITLE OF PROGRAM: JAPANESE CULTURE & ART<br />

TYPE OF PROGRAM: WORKSHOP<br />

DISTRICT/ SCHOOL:<br />

# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />

PELHAM/HUTCHINSON ELEM.<br />

# OF STUDENTS: GRADE(S) 1-5<br />

DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 10/12-12/8/11<br />

NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />

STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 X STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4 X<br />

1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />

1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />

1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />

2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />

3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />

4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />

5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />

6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />

7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />

THE PRESENTATION WAS WELL PREPARED AND EDUCATIONAL.<br />

THE STUDENTS ENJOYED IT VERY MUCH.<br />

8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />

NONE<br />

9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />

NONE<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

1.<br />

2.<br />

3.<br />

4.<br />

5.<br />

6.<br />

STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />

ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />

EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />

ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />

TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />

QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />

KAZUKO'S CLASS IS FABULOUS. IT IS TRULY UNBELIEVABLE THE<br />

WAY SHE TEACHES HER STUDENTS ORAGAMI AND JAPANESE<br />

CALLIGRAPHY.<br />

8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />

NONE<br />

9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />

WE LOOK FORWARD TO HAVING HER BACK.<br />

Arts in Education Service - School Evaluations <strong>2011</strong>-<strong>2012</strong><br />

Page 181 of 332


ARTIST: KAZUKO OMORI<br />

CONTRACT #: A7644<br />

TITLE OF PROGRAM: JAPANESE CULTURE & ART<br />

TYPE OF PROGRAM: WORKSHOP<br />

DISTRICT/ SCHOOL:<br />

# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />

PELHAM/SIWANOY ELEM.<br />

# OF STUDENTS: 8 GRADE(S) 1 & 2<br />

DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 10/7-12/9/11<br />

NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />

STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 X STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4 X<br />

ARTIST: KAZUKO OMORI<br />

CONTRACT #: A8372A<br />

TITLE OF PROGRAM: JAPANESE CULTURE & ART I<br />

TYPE OF PROGRAM: WORKSHOP<br />

DISTRICT/ SCHOOL:<br />

# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />

PELHAM/HUTCHINSON ELEM.<br />

# OF STUDENTS: 10 GRADE(S) 1 & 2<br />

DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 2/8-4/4/12<br />

NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />

STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 X STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4 X<br />

1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />

1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />

1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />

2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />

3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />

4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />

5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />

6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />

4<br />

4<br />

4<br />

4<br />

N/<br />

5<br />

1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />

2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />

3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />

4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />

5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />

6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM?<br />

NONE<br />

8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />

NONE<br />

9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />

NONE<br />

Y<br />

WHY?<br />

7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />

STUDENTS AND PARENTS LOVE HOW SHE CHANGES HER<br />

CURRICULUM TO REFLECT THE SEASONS.<br />

8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />

NONE<br />

9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />

NONE<br />

ARTIST: KAZUKO OMORI<br />

CONTRACT #: A8052A<br />

TITLE OF PROGRAM: JAPANESE CULTURE & ART I<br />

TYPE OF PROGRAM: WORKSHOP<br />

DISTRICT/ SCHOOL:<br />

# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />

PELHAM/PROSPECT HILL ELEM.<br />

# OF STUDENTS: 8 GRADE(S) 3-5<br />

DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 1/9-3/12/12<br />

NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />

STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 X STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4 X<br />

ARTIST: KAZUKO OMORI<br />

CONTRACT #: A8372B<br />

TITLE OF PROGRAM: JAPANESE CULTURE & ART II<br />

TYPE OF PROGRAM: WORKSHOP<br />

DISTRICT/ SCHOOL:<br />

# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />

PELHAM/HUTCHINSON ELEM.<br />

# OF STUDENTS: 10 GRADE(S) 3-5<br />

DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 2/9-4/5/12<br />

NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />

STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 X STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4 X<br />

1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />

1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />

1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />

2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />

3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />

4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />

5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />

6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

N/<br />

1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />

2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />

3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />

4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />

5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />

6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM?<br />

NONE<br />

8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />

NONE<br />

9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />

NONE<br />

Y<br />

WHY?<br />

7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />

STUDENTS AND PARENTS LOVE HOW SHE CHANGES HER<br />

PROGRAMS TO REFLECT THE SEASONS.<br />

8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />

NONE<br />

9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />

NONE<br />

Arts in Education Service - School Evaluations <strong>2011</strong>-<strong>2012</strong><br />

Page 182 of 332


ARTIST: KAZUKO OMORI<br />

CONTRACT #: A8362<br />

TITLE OF PROGRAM: JAPANEXE CULTURE & ART<br />

TYPE OF PROGRAM: WORKSHOP<br />

DISTRICT/ SCHOOL:<br />

# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />

PELHAM/SIWANOY ELEM.<br />

# OF STUDENTS: 9 GRADE(S) K-2<br />

DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 2/3-3/29/12<br />

NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />

STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 X STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4 X<br />

ARTIST: KEEP THE COUNTRY DANCING, INC. CONTRACT #: A8271A<br />

TITLE OF PROGRAM: AMERICAN FOOTSTEPS<br />

TYPE OF PROGRAM: ASSEMBLY<br />

DISTRICT/ SCHOOL: CHAPPAQUA/BELL MIDDLE SCHOOL<br />

# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />

# OF STUDENTS: 170 GRADE(S) 5<br />

DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 5/2/12<br />

NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />

STANDARD 1 STANDARD 2 STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4 X<br />

1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />

1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />

1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />

2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />

3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />

4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />

5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />

6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />

2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />

3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />

4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />

5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />

6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />

3<br />

3<br />

3<br />

3<br />

N/<br />

N/<br />

7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM?<br />

NONE<br />

8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />

NONE<br />

9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />

NONE<br />

Y<br />

WHY?<br />

7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />

THIS PROGRAM NEEDS AN AREA WITH A LOT OF SPACE AND<br />

SMALL GROUPS TO BE EFFECTIVE.<br />

8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />

NONE<br />

9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />

NONE<br />

ARTIST: KEEP THE COUNTRY DANCING, INC. CONTRACT #: A8125<br />

TITLE OF PROGRAM: HOEDOWN<br />

TYPE OF PROGRAM: WORKSHOP<br />

DISTRICT/ SCHOOL:<br />

# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />

ARDSLEY/CONCORD ROAD ELEM.<br />

# OF STUDENTS: 150 GRADE(S) 2<br />

DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 6/1/12<br />

NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />

STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4 X<br />

ARTIST: KEEP THE COUNTRY DANCING, INC. CONTRACT #: A8640<br />

TITLE OF PROGRAM: SQUARE DANCING<br />

TYPE OF PROGRAM: WORKSHOP<br />

DISTRICT/ SCHOOL:<br />

# OF TEACHERS: 10<br />

BRIARCLIFF/TODD ELEM.<br />

# OF STUDENTS: 112 GRADE(S) 5<br />

DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 5/31/12<br />

NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />

STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4 X<br />

1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />

1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />

1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />

2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />

3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />

4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />

5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />

6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />

2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />

3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />

4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />

5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />

6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />

THIS IS A WONDERFUL CULMINATING EVENT. THE 2ND GRADE<br />

PARENTS AND CHILDREN ENJOY SPENDING TIME PERFORMING<br />

TOGETHER FOR A SQUARE DANCE.<br />

8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />

NONE<br />

9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />

EVERYONE ENJOYED THE ACTIVITY.<br />

7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />

PAT HAS A WONDERFULLY FIRM AND RESPECTFUL WAY OF<br />

INTRODUCING STUDENTS TO DANCING, QUICKLY OVERCOMING<br />

ANY AWKWARDNESS ON THEIR PART.<br />

8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />

NONE<br />

9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />

LOOKING FORWARD TO NEXT YEAR.<br />

Arts in Education Service - School Evaluations <strong>2011</strong>-<strong>2012</strong><br />

Page 183 of 332


ARTIST: KEEP THE COUNTRY DANCING, INC. CONTRACT #: A8271B<br />

TITLE OF PROGRAM: SQUARE DANCING<br />

TYPE OF PROGRAM: WORKSHOP<br />

DISTRICT/ SCHOOL: CHAPPAQUA/SEVEN BRIDGES MIDDLE SCHOOL<br />

# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />

# OF STUDENTS: 150 GRADE(S) 5<br />

DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 5/2/12<br />

NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />

STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4 X<br />

ARTIST: KEEP THE COUNTRY DANCING, INC. CONTRACT #: A8641<br />

TITLE OF PROGRAM: SQUARE DANCING<br />

TYPE OF PROGRAM: ASSEMBLY<br />

DISTRICT/ SCHOOL: KATONAH/LEWISBORO/KATONAH ELEM. SCHOOL<br />

# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />

# OF STUDENTS: 400 GRADE(S) K-5<br />

DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 4/20/12<br />

NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />

STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4 X<br />

1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />

1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />

1.<br />

2.<br />

3.<br />

4.<br />

5.<br />

6.<br />

STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />

ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />

EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />

ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />

TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />

QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />

4<br />

5<br />

4<br />

5<br />

5<br />

N/<br />

7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />

AMAZING THAT SHE HAD 150 STUDENTS DANCING, RESPONDING TO<br />

HER INSTRUCTIONS AND LEARNING THE DANCE TERMS AFTER<br />

JUST AN HOUR.<br />

8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />

NONE<br />

9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />

THE GROUP WAS RATHER LARGE. WE DISCUSSED HAVING TWO<br />

SESSIONS OF 75 STUDENTS EACH NEXT YEAR TO ENHANCE THE<br />

EXPERIENCE.<br />

1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />

2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />

3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />

4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />

5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />

6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />

7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />

NONE<br />

8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />

NONE<br />

9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />

NONE<br />

3.5<br />

4<br />

3<br />

4<br />

4<br />

3<br />

ARTIST: KEEP THE COUNTRY DANCING, INC. CONTRACT #: A7944<br />

TITLE OF PROGRAM: SQUARE DANCING WORKSHOP<br />

TYPE OF PROGRAM: RESIDENCY<br />

DISTRICT/ SCHOOL: HENDRICK HUDSON/BUCHANAN/VERPLANCK ELEM.<br />

# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />

# OF STUDENTS: 263 GRADE(S) 1-5<br />

DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 2/8-10/12<br />

NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />

STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4 X<br />

ARTIST: KENNETH SWINKIN<br />

CONTRACT #: A8842<br />

TITLE OF PROGRAM: DRUMMER FOR THE SHOW - PETER PAN<br />

TYPE OF PROGRAM: ASSEMBLY<br />

DISTRICT/ SCHOOL: CHAPPAQUA/ROARING BROOK ELEM.<br />

# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />

# OF STUDENTS: 113 GRADE(S) 2-4<br />

DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 5/30-6/3/12<br />

NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />

STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />

1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />

1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />

1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />

2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />

3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />

4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />

5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />

6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />

7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />

I ALREADY RECOMMENDED THIS TO THE HALDANE DISTRICT<br />

WHERE I LIVE.<br />

8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />

NONE<br />

9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />

PAT CANNON DID A TERRIFIC JOB MAKING SQUARE DANCING FUN<br />

FOR ALL THE STUDENTS - EVEN THE RELUCTANT PARTICIPANTS.<br />

BY DAY 2 THERE WAS A BUZZ OF EXCITEMENT AMONG ALL THE<br />

STUDENTS.<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />

2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />

3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />

4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />

5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />

6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />

7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />

NONE<br />

8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />

NONE<br />

9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />

A PLEASURE TO WORK WITH.<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

Arts in Education Service - School Evaluations <strong>2011</strong>-<strong>2012</strong><br />

Page 184 of 332


ARTIST: KENNETH W. MILLER dba KENNETH LITT CONTRACT #: A7760<br />

TITLE OF PROGRAM: FROM THE HEART OF LITTLE HAWK<br />

TYPE OF PROGRAM: ASSEMBLY<br />

DISTRICT/ SCHOOL: EASTCHESTER/WAVERLY EARLY CHILDHOOD CTR<br />

# OF TEACHERS: 6<br />

# OF STUDENTS: 257 GRADE(S) K<br />

DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 11/10/11<br />

NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />

STANDARD 1 STANDARD 2 STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4 X<br />

ARTIST: KEVIN BAKER<br />

CONTRACT #: A8311<br />

TITLE OF PROGRAM: SET DESIGN FOR THE SHOW - GUYS & DOLLS<br />

TYPE OF PROGRAM: RESIDENCY<br />

DISTRICT/ SCHOOL: KATONAH/LEWISBORO/JOHN JAY HIGH SCHOOL<br />

# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />

# OF STUDENTS: 150 GRADE(S) 9-12<br />

DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 2/1-3/22/12<br />

NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />

STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 X STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />

1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />

1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />

1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />

2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />

3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />

4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />

5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />

6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />

7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />

SPEAKS ON THE CHILDRENS LEVEL. TEACHES GREAT LIFE<br />

LESSONS. GREAT INTERESTING PROGRAM. WONDERFUL AND<br />

ENTERTAINING STORIES WITH LESSONS.<br />

8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />

NONE<br />

9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />

THE CHILDREN REALLY ENJOYED IT. IT WAS VERY EDUCATIONAL<br />

AS WELL AND ALWAYS ENTERTAINING.<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />

2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />

3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />

4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />

5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />

6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />

7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />

NONE<br />

8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />

NONE<br />

9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />

NONE<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

ARTIST: KEVIN BAKER<br />

CONTRACT #: A7686<br />

TITLE OF PROGRAM: SET DESIGNER FOR THE FALL SHOW<br />

TYPE OF PROGRAM: RESIDENCY<br />

DISTRICT/ SCHOOL: KATONAH/LEWISBORO/JOHN JAY HIGH SCHOOL<br />

# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />

# OF STUDENTS: 400 GRADE(S) 9-12<br />

DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 10/29, 30, 11/4 & 5/11<br />

NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />

STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 X STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />

ARTIST: KEVIN GERAGHTY<br />

CONTRACT #: A7526A<br />

TITLE OF PROGRAM: NATIVE AMERICAN CULTURE - ART & HISTORY<br />

TYPE OF PROGRAM: WORKSHOP<br />

DISTRICT/ SCHOOL:<br />

# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />

LAKELAND/VAN CORT ELEM.<br />

# OF STUDENTS: 100 GRADE(S) K<br />

DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 11/15 & 16/11<br />

NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />

STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 X STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4 X<br />

1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />

1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />

1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />

2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />

3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />

4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />

5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />

6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />

7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />

NONE<br />

8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />

NONE<br />

9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />

NONE<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

1.<br />

2.<br />

3.<br />

4.<br />

5.<br />

6.<br />

STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />

ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />

EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />

ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />

TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />

QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

N/<br />

7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />

KEVIN IS INCREDIBLY PATIENT WITH THE CHILDREN. HE HAS MANY<br />

HANDS ON OPPORTUNITIES AND STUDENT PARTICIPATION IS HIGH.<br />

8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />

NONE<br />

9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />

KEVIN HAS BEEN COMING TO OUR SCHOOL FOR MANY YEARS. HE<br />

HAS NEVER FAILED TO ENGAGE THE CHILDREN FOR HIS ENTIRE<br />

PROGRAM.<br />

Arts in Education Service - School Evaluations <strong>2011</strong>-<strong>2012</strong><br />

Page 185 of 332


ARTIST: KEVIN GERAGHTY<br />

CONTRACT #: A7602<br />

TITLE OF PROGRAM: NATIVE AMERICAN CULTURE - ART & HISTORY<br />

TYPE OF PROGRAM: WORKSHOP<br />

DISTRICT/ SCHOOL: HENDRICK HUDSON/FURNACE WOODS ELEM.<br />

# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />

# OF STUDENTS: 72 GRADE(S) 4<br />

DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 10/6/11<br />

NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />

STANDARD 1 STANDARD 2 STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4 X<br />

ARTIST: KEVIN GERAGHTY<br />

CONTRACT #: A7526B<br />

TITLE OF PROGRAM: SENSORY AWARENESS<br />

TYPE OF PROGRAM: ASSEMBLY<br />

DISTRICT/ SCHOOL:<br />

# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />

LAKELAND/VAN CORT ELEM.<br />

# OF STUDENTS: 100 GRADE(S) K<br />

DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 5/17 & 18/12<br />

NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />

STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 X STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />

1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />

1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />

1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />

2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />

3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />

4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />

5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />

6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />

2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />

3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />

4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />

5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />

6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />

KEVIN ALWAYS GIVES A HANDS-ON INTERESTING PROGRAM.<br />

8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />

NONE<br />

9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />

THANKS.<br />

7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />

HE IS GREAT. WE ARE THANKFULL FOR THE OPPORTUNITY TO<br />

HAVE HIM.<br />

8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />

NONE<br />

9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />

NONE<br />

ARTIST: KEVIN NATHANIEL HYLTON<br />

CONTRACT #: A8873<br />

TITLE OF PROGRAM: MBIRA WORKSHOPS - CREATING AN AFRICAN<br />

INSTRUMENT<br />

TYPE OF PROGRAM: WORKSHOP<br />

DISTRICT/ SCHOOL: NEW ROCHELLE/WARD ELEM. SCHOOL<br />

# OF TEACHERS: 8<br />

# OF STUDENTS: 179 GRADE(S) 3<br />

DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 6/1-14/12<br />

NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />

STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 X STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4 X<br />

1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />

ARTIST: KID POWER CARES, INC. dba KID POWE<br />

CONTRACT #: A8846<br />

TITLE OF PROGRAM: KID POWER & THE PLANET PROTECTORS<br />

TYPE OF PROGRAM: ASSEMBLY<br />

DISTRICT/ SCHOOL: NEW ROCHELLE/WARD ELEM. SCHOOL<br />

# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />

# OF STUDENTS: 550 GRADE(S) K-3<br />

DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 5/18/12<br />

NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />

STANDARD 1 STANDARD 2 STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />

1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />

1.<br />

2.<br />

3.<br />

4.<br />

5.<br />

6.<br />

STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />

ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />

EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />

ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />

TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />

QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

4<br />

7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />

KEVIN'S VISITS WERE EAGERLY ANTICIPATED. HE IS A TALENTED<br />

MUSIC EDUCATOR.<br />

8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />

WE'D WELCOME ADDITIONAL MATERIALS.<br />

9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />

ALL WERE IMPRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM. THIS WAS A UNIQUE<br />

EDUCATIONAL OPPORTUNITY FOR ALL OF US.<br />

1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />

2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />

3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />

4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />

5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />

6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />

7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />

A GREAT EDUCATION AND ENTERTAINING PERFORMANCE.<br />

8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />

NONE<br />

9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />

NONE<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

N/<br />

Arts in Education Service - School Evaluations <strong>2011</strong>-<strong>2012</strong><br />

Page 186 of 332


ARTIST: KID POWER CARES, INC. dba KID POWE CONTRACT #: A7571<br />

TITLE OF PROGRAM: KID POWER & THE PLANET PROTECTORS -<br />

OPERATION LUNCH LINE<br />

TYPE OF PROGRAM: ASSEMBLY<br />

DISTRICT/ SCHOOL: EASTCHESTER/GREENVALE ELEM.<br />

# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />

# OF STUDENTS: GRADE(S) 2<br />

DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 3/16/12<br />

NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />

STANDARD 1 STANDARD 2 STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />

1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />

ARTIST: KIM JOANNE KOVACH<br />

CONTRACT #: A8747<br />

TITLE OF PROGRAM: AUTHOR VISIT<br />

TYPE OF PROGRAM: WORKSHOP<br />

DISTRICT/ SCHOOL: KATONAH/LEWISBORO/INCREASE MILLER ELEM.<br />

# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />

# OF STUDENTS: 66 GRADE(S) 2<br />

DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 4/24/12<br />

NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />

STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />

1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />

1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />

2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />

3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />

4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />

5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />

6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />

7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />

CHILDREN LEARNED ABOUT NUTRITION, PORTION CONTROL,<br />

EXERCISE IN A FUN WAY.<br />

8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />

NONE<br />

9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />

NONE<br />

5<br />

5<br />

4<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />

2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />

3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />

4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />

5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />

6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />

7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />

SHE INSPIRED EVEN THE MOST RELUCTANT WRITERS. HER<br />

WORKSHOP WAS GRADE APPROPRIATE.<br />

8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />

NONE<br />

9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />

IT IS ESPECIALLY NICE FOR THE CHILDREN TO BE ABLE TO WORK<br />

WITH A LOCAL AUTHOR.<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

ARTIST: KIM JOANNE KOVACH<br />

CONTRACT #: A7586<br />

TITLE OF PROGRAM: AUTHOR VISIT<br />

TYPE OF PROGRAM: WORKSHOP<br />

DISTRICT/ SCHOOL: KATONAH/LEWISBORO/KATONAH ELEM. SCHOOL<br />

# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />

# OF STUDENTS: 67 GRADE(S) 2<br />

DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 3/8/12<br />

NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />

STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />

1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />

ARTIST: KIMBERLY HILL<br />

CONTRACT #: A7541<br />

TITLE OF PROGRAM: SET DESIGNER FOR THE SHOW - THE DROWSY<br />

CHAPERONE<br />

TYPE OF PROGRAM: RESIDENCY<br />

DISTRICT/ SCHOOL: CHAPPAQUA/HORACE GREELEY HIGH SCHOOL<br />

# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />

# OF STUDENTS: 25 GRADE(S) 9-12<br />

DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 9/24-11/19/11<br />

NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />

STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 X STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />

1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />

1.<br />

2.<br />

3.<br />

4.<br />

5.<br />

6.<br />

STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />

ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />

EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />

ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />

TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />

QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />

KIM'S WORKSHOP SERVED AS A WONDERFUL INTRO AND KICKED<br />

OFF A FICTION WRITING UNIT.<br />

8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />

NONE<br />

9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />

THANK YOU.<br />

1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />

2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />

3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />

4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />

5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />

6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />

7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />

THE DESIGN FOR DROWSY CHAPERONE IS INVENTIVE AND<br />

PRACTICAL.<br />

8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />

NONE<br />

9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />

I LOOKED FORWARDED TO SEEING THE DESIGN BECOME A<br />

REALITY.<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

Arts in Education Service - School Evaluations <strong>2011</strong>-<strong>2012</strong><br />

Page 187 of 332


ARTIST: KIRK EHRENREICH<br />

CONTRACT #: A8429<br />

TITLE OF PROGRAM: PIANO PLAYER FOR THE SHOW - THE DROWSY<br />

CHAPERONE<br />

TYPE OF PROGRAM: ASSEMBLY<br />

DISTRICT/ SCHOOL: KATONAH/LEWISBORO/JOHN JAY MIDDLE SCHOOL<br />

# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />

# OF STUDENTS: 75 GRADE(S) 6-8<br />

DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 3/3-17/12<br />

NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />

STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />

1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />

ARTIST: KJK PRODUCTIONS, INC.<br />

CONTRACT #: A8676<br />

TITLE OF PROGRAM: DIRECTOR FOR SHOW - PETER PAN<br />

TYPE OF PROGRAM: RESIDENCY<br />

DISTRICT/ SCHOOL: CHAPPAQUA/ROARING BROOK ELEM.<br />

# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />

# OF STUDENTS: 113 GRADE(S) 2-4<br />

DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 3/28-6/3/12<br />

NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />

STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 X STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />

1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />

1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />

2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />

3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />

4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />

5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />

6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />

7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />

KIRK WAS EXCELLENT. WE LOOK FORWARD TO WORKING WITH<br />

HIM AGAIN.<br />

8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />

NONE<br />

9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />

NONE<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

N/<br />

1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />

2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />

3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />

4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />

5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />

6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />

7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />

A WONDERFUL PRODUCTION. THE CHILDREN HAD A GREAT<br />

EXPERIENCE.<br />

8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />

NONE<br />

9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />

NONE<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

ARTIST: KJK PRODUCTIONS, INC.<br />

CONTRACT #: A8493<br />

TITLE OF PROGRAM: DIRECTOR FOR THE SHOW - ANNIE JR. / ASS'TS<br />

KRISTEN SPARRO & BRANDON JAMES WINN<br />

TYPE OF PROGRAM: RESIDENCY<br />

DISTRICT/ SCHOOL: CHAPPAQUA/WESTORCHARD ELEM.<br />

# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />

# OF STUDENTS: 105 GRADE(S) 2-4<br />

DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 4/16-29/12<br />

NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />

STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 X STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />

1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />

ARTIST: KJK PRODUCTIONS, INC.<br />

CONTRACT #: A8118<br />

TITLE OF PROGRAM: DIRECTOR FOR THE SHOW - FOOTLOOSE / ASS'TS<br />

ROBERT GRAHAM, SAMANTHA GROSSMAN &<br />

REBECCA STERN<br />

TYPE OF PROGRAM: RESIDENCY<br />

DISTRICT/ SCHOOL:<br />

CHAPPAQUA/BELL MIDDLE SCHOOL<br />

# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />

# OF STUDENTS: GRADE(S) 5-8<br />

DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 1/17-3/25/12<br />

NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />

STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 X STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />

1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />

1.<br />

2.<br />

3.<br />

4.<br />

5.<br />

6.<br />

STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />

ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />

EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />

ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />

TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />

QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />

THIS WAS AN AWESOME PROGRAM. OUR STUDENTS LOVED THE<br />

ENTIRE CREATIVE STAFF. THEY LEARNED ALL ASPECTS OF<br />

MUSICAL THEATRE AND HAD A GREAT TIME. ENTIRE STAFF WAS<br />

WARM, PATIENT AND ATTENTIVE TO THE KIDS.<br />

8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />

NONE<br />

9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />

NONE<br />

1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />

2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />

3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />

4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />

5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />

6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />

7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />

IT IS A FANTASTIC PROGRAM FOR THE STUDENTS.<br />

8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />

NONE<br />

9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />

NONE<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

Arts in Education Service - School Evaluations <strong>2011</strong>-<strong>2012</strong><br />

Page 188 of 332


ARTIST:<br />

KJK PRODUCTIONS, INC.<br />

CONTRACT #: A8110<br />

TITLE OF PROGRAM: KEVIN KEARINS - DIRECTOR FOR THE SHOW -<br />

SEUSSICAL / ASS'TS TERRY CANZIANI & REBECCA<br />

STERN<br />

TYPE OF PROGRAM: WORKSHOP<br />

DISTRICT/ SCHOOL:<br />

CHAPPAQUA/SEVEN BRIDGES MIDDLE SCHOOL<br />

# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />

# OF STUDENTS: 103 GRADE(S) 5-8<br />

DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE<br />

12/15/11-2/13/12<br />

NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />

STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 X STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />

1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />

ARTIST: KJK PRODUCTIONS, INC.<br />

CONTRACT #: A8821<br />

TITLE OF PROGRAM: KRISTIN SPARRO - CHOREOGRAPHER FOR SHOW -<br />

PETER PAN<br />

TYPE OF PROGRAM: WORKSHOP<br />

DISTRICT/ SCHOOL: CHAPPAQUA/ROARING BROOK ELEM.<br />

# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />

# OF STUDENTS: 120 GRADE(S) 2-4<br />

DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 5/1-6/3/12<br />

NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />

STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 X STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />

1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />

1.<br />

2.<br />

3.<br />

4.<br />

5.<br />

6.<br />

STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />

ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />

EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />

ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />

TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />

QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />

KEVIN NOT ONLY TAUGHT EXCELLENT THEATER SKILLS BUT<br />

CONFIDENCE AND COURAGE THROUGH PERFORMANCE AS WELL.<br />

PLUS A WONDERFUL EXPERIENCE WORKING AS A TEAM.<br />

8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />

NONE<br />

9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />

NONE<br />

1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />

2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />

3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />

4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />

5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />

6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />

7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />

NONE<br />

8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />

NONE<br />

9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />

WONDERFUL ENERGETIC TEACHER WITH LOTS OF PATIENCE.<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

N/<br />

ARTIST: KNIGHTHORSE THEATRE COMPANY, IN CONTRACT #: A8668<br />

TITLE OF PROGRAM: SHAKESCENES<br />

TYPE OF PROGRAM: RESIDENCY<br />

DISTRICT/ SCHOOL: PUTNAM VALLEY/PUTNAM VALLEY HIGH SCHOOL<br />

# OF TEACHERS: 3<br />

# OF STUDENTS: 175 GRADE(S) 9-12<br />

DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 4/12-23/12<br />

NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />

STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 X STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4 X<br />

ARTIST: KNIGHTHORSE THEATRE COMPANY, IN CONTRACT #: A8261<br />

TITLE OF PROGRAM: SHAKESPEARE ROMEO & JULIET<br />

TYPE OF PROGRAM: ASSEMBLY/WORKSHOP<br />

DISTRICT/ SCHOOL: DOBBS FERRY/DOBBS FERRY MIDDLE SCHOOL<br />

# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />

# OF STUDENTS: 115 GRADE(S) 8<br />

DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 1/23/12<br />

NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />

STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 X STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4 X<br />

1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />

1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />

1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />

2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />

3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />

4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />

5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />

6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />

7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />

WONDERFUL PROGRAM. THESE ARE AMAZING PROFESSIONALS<br />

WHO BRING SHAKESPEARE TO LIFE.<br />

8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />

NONE<br />

9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />

WE LOVED THEM.<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />

2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />

3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />

4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />

5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />

6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />

7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />

THEY BRING SHAKESPEARE TO LIFE FOR THE STUDENTS. THEY<br />

HELPED THE STUDENTS FEEL COMFORTABLE READING AND<br />

ACTING SINGLE LINES.<br />

8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />

NONE<br />

9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />

THANK YOU FOR A GREAT DAY.<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

Arts in Education Service - School Evaluations <strong>2011</strong>-<strong>2012</strong><br />

Page 189 of 332


ARTIST: KNIGHTLEE, LLC<br />

CONTRACT #: A8413<br />

TITLE OF PROGRAM: LEE KNIGHT - BOOKS ALIVE / BLACK HISTORY<br />

CONCERT<br />

TYPE OF PROGRAM: ASSEMBLY<br />

DISTRICT/ SCHOOL:<br />

# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />

YORKTOWN/BROOKSIDE ELEM.<br />

# OF STUDENTS: 300 GRADE(S) K-3<br />

DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 2/17/12<br />

NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />

STANDARD 1 STANDARD 2 STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4 X<br />

1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />

ARTIST: KRISTOPHEER THORNTON<br />

CONTRACT #: A8452<br />

TITLE OF PROGRAM: SET DESIGN & CONSTRUCTION FOR THE SHOW - A<br />

FUNNY THING HAPPENED ON THE WAY TO THE<br />

FORUM<br />

TYPE OF PROGRAM: RESIDENCY<br />

DISTRICT/ SCHOOL:<br />

PUTNAM VALLEY/PUTNAM VALLEY HIGH SCHOOL<br />

# OF TEACHERS: 3<br />

# OF STUDENTS: 400 GRADE(S) 9-12<br />

DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 3/3-4/23/12<br />

NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />

STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 X STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />

1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />

1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />

2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />

3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />

4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />

5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />

6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />

7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />

THE CONTENT MATERIAL, ALTHOUGH SERIOUS IN NATURE, WAS<br />

MADE LIGHT AND AGE APPROPRIATE. THE CHILDREN LEARNED<br />

THROUGH ACTING AND SINGING.<br />

8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />

HAVE MS. LEE GET AN ASSISTANT.<br />

9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />

I APPRECIATED THE TIME ALLOWED FOR QUESTIONS. IT SHOWED<br />

THEY TOOK SOMETHING AWAY FROM THE PROGRAM.<br />

3<br />

4<br />

5<br />

4<br />

5<br />

5<br />

1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />

2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />

3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />

4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />

5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />

6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />

7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />

NONE<br />

8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />

NONE<br />

9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />

NONE<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

ARTIST: KRISTOPHEER THORNTON<br />

CONTRACT #: A7780<br />

TITLE OF PROGRAM: SET DESIGN & CONSTRUCTION FOR THE SHOW -<br />

DRACULA<br />

TYPE OF PROGRAM: RESIDENCY<br />

DISTRICT/ SCHOOL: PUTNAM VALLEY/PUTNAM VALLEY HIGH SCHOOL<br />

# OF TEACHERS: 2<br />

# OF STUDENTS: 50 GRADE(S) 9-12<br />

DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 11/1-12/5/11<br />

NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />

STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 X STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />

1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />

ARTIST: LANI CHANG<br />

CONTRACT #: A8358<br />

TITLE OF PROGRAM: INTRO TO THE VIOLIN<br />

TYPE OF PROGRAM: WORKSHOP<br />

DISTRICT/ SCHOOL:<br />

# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />

PELHAM/SIWANOY ELEM.<br />

# OF STUDENTS: 9 GRADE(S) K-2<br />

DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 2/1-4/4/12<br />

NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />

STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 X STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />

1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />

1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />

2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />

3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />

4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />

5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />

6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />

7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />

NONE<br />

8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />

NONE<br />

9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />

NONE<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />

2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />

3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />

4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />

5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />

6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />

7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />

NONE<br />

8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />

NONE<br />

9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />

NONE<br />

4<br />

4<br />

4<br />

4<br />

4<br />

4<br />

Arts in Education Service - School Evaluations <strong>2011</strong>-<strong>2012</strong><br />

Page 190 of 332


ARTIST: LANI CHANG<br />

CONTRACT #: A8047<br />

TITLE OF PROGRAM: INTRO TO THE VIOLIN<br />

TYPE OF PROGRAM: WORKSHOP<br />

DISTRICT/ SCHOOL:<br />

# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />

PELHAM/PROSPECT HILL ELEM.<br />

# OF STUDENTS: 8 GRADE(S) K-2<br />

DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 1/9-3/5/12<br />

NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />

STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 X STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />

ARTIST: LANI CHANG<br />

CONTRACT #: A7611<br />

TITLE OF PROGRAM: INTRO TO THE VIOLIN<br />

TYPE OF PROGRAM: WORKSHOP<br />

DISTRICT/ SCHOOL:<br />

# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />

PELHAM/SIWANOY ELEM.<br />

# OF STUDENTS: 8 GRADE(S) K-2<br />

DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 10/5-11/30/11<br />

NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />

STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 X STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />

1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />

1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />

1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />

2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />

3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />

4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />

5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />

6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

N/<br />

1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />

2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />

3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />

4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />

5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />

6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

N/<br />

5<br />

7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM?<br />

NONE<br />

Y<br />

WHY?<br />

7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM?<br />

NONE<br />

Y<br />

WHY?<br />

8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />

NONE<br />

9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />

NONE<br />

8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />

NONE<br />

9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />

NONE<br />

ARTIST: LANI KING CHANG<br />

CONTRACT #: A7964<br />

TITLE OF PROGRAM: INTRO TO THE VIOLIN<br />

TYPE OF PROGRAM: WORKSHOP<br />

DISTRICT/ SCHOOL:<br />

# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />

PELHAM/COLONIAL ELEM.<br />

# OF STUDENTS: 8 GRADE(S) K-2<br />

DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 12/2/11-2/16/12<br />

NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />

STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 X STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />

1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />

ARTIST: LAURA A. BETZ-FAY<br />

CONTRACT #: A7712<br />

TITLE OF PROGRAM: VIOLA PLAYER FOR THE SHOW - ANNIE GET YOUR<br />

GUN<br />

TYPE OF PROGRAM: ASSEMBLY<br />

DISTRICT/ SCHOOL: LAKELAND/WALTER PANAS HIGH SCHOOL<br />

# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />

# OF STUDENTS: 100 GRADE(S) 9-12<br />

DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 11/14-19/11<br />

NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />

STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />

1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />

1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />

2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />

3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />

4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />

5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />

6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />

7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />

LANI IS A WONDERFUL AND PATIENT TEACHER. SHE<br />

ENTHUSIASTICALLY TEACHERS THE BASICS OF PLAYING THE<br />

VIOLIN AND MAKES IT FUN.<br />

8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />

NONE<br />

9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />

THE CHILDREN HAD A WONDERFUL TIME.<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

N/<br />

N/<br />

1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />

2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />

3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />

4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />

5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />

6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />

7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />

NONE<br />

8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />

NONE<br />

9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />

NONE<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

Arts in Education Service - School Evaluations <strong>2011</strong>-<strong>2012</strong><br />

Page 191 of 332


ARTIST: LAURA A. BETZ-FAY<br />

CONTRACT #: A8331<br />

TITLE OF PROGRAM: VIOLA PLAYER FOR THE SHOW - MY FAIR LADY<br />

TYPE OF PROGRAM: ASSEMBLY<br />

DISTRICT/ SCHOOL: LAKELAND/WALTER PANAS HIGH SCHOOL<br />

# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />

# OF STUDENTS: 200 GRADE(S) 9-12<br />

DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 4/30-5/5/12<br />

NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />

STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />

1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />

ARTIST: LAURA SHERWOOD<br />

CONTRACT #: A8444<br />

TITLE OF PROGRAM: PRODUCTION DESIGNER FOR THE SHOW - A FUNNY<br />

THING HAPPENED ON THE WAY TO THE FORUM<br />

TYPE OF PROGRAM: RESIDENCY<br />

DISTRICT/ SCHOOL: PUTNAM VALLEY/PUTNAM VALLEY HIGH SCHOOL<br />

# OF TEACHERS: 3<br />

# OF STUDENTS: 400 GRADE(S) 9-12<br />

DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 3/3-4/23/12<br />

NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />

STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 X STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />

1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />

1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />

2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />

3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />

4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />

5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />

6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />

7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />

NONE<br />

8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />

NONE<br />

9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />

NONE<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />

2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />

3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />

4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />

5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />

6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />

7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />

NONE<br />

8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />

NONE<br />

9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />

NONE<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

ARTIST: LAURA SHERWOOD<br />

CONTRACT #: A7819<br />

TITLE OF PROGRAM: PRODUCTION DESIGNER FOR THE SHOW - DRACULA<br />

TYPE OF PROGRAM: RESIDENCY<br />

DISTRICT/ SCHOOL: PUTNAM VALLEY/PUTNAM VALLEY HIGH SCHOOL<br />

# OF TEACHERS: 2<br />

# OF STUDENTS: 50 GRADE(S) 9-12<br />

DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 11/1-12/4/11<br />

NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />

STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 X STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />

1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />

ARTIST: LAUREN ELLIS<br />

CONTRACT #: A8801<br />

TITLE OF PROGRAM: VIOLIN PLAYER FOR THE SHOW - A FUNNY THING<br />

HAPPENED ON THE WAY TO THE FORUM<br />

TYPE OF PROGRAM: ASSEMBLY<br />

DISTRICT/ SCHOOL: PUTNAM VALLEY/PUTNAM VALLEY HIGH SCHOOL<br />

# OF TEACHERS: 3<br />

# OF STUDENTS: 400 GRADE(S) 9-12<br />

DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 4/13-23/12<br />

NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />

STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />

1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />

1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />

2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />

3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />

4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />

5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />

6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />

7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />

NONE<br />

8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />

NONE<br />

9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />

NONE<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />

2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />

3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />

4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />

5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />

6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />

7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />

NONE<br />

8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />

NONE<br />

9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />

NONE<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

N/<br />

Arts in Education Service - School Evaluations <strong>2011</strong>-<strong>2012</strong><br />

Page 192 of 332


ARTIST: LAUREN HOSFORD CORTEZ<br />

CONTRACT #: A8510<br />

TITLE OF PROGRAM: FRENCH HORN PLAYER FOR THE SHOW - BEAUTY<br />

AND THE BEAST<br />

TYPE OF PROGRAM: ASSEMBLY<br />

DISTRICT/ SCHOOL: PLEASANTVILLE/PLEASANTVILLE HIGH SCHOOL<br />

# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />

# OF STUDENTS: 400 GRADE(S) 9-12<br />

DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 3/9-17/12<br />

NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />

STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />

ARTIST: LAUREN VALENTI<br />

CONTRACT #: A8019<br />

TITLE OF PROGRAM: COURTRY WESTERN & HIP HOP DANCING FOR JAZZ<br />

CO.<br />

TYPE OF PROGRAM: WORKSHOP<br />

DISTRICT/ SCHOOL: TUCKAHOE/TUCKAHOE HIGH SCHOOL<br />

# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />

# OF STUDENTS: 60 GRADE(S) 9-12<br />

DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 11/28/11-3/3/12<br />

NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />

STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 X STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4 X<br />

1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />

1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />

1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />

2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />

3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />

4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />

5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />

6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

N/<br />

5<br />

N/<br />

1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />

2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />

3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />

4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />

5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />

6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

N/<br />

7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM?<br />

GREAT SUPPORT FOR OUR PRODUCTION.<br />

Y<br />

WHY?<br />

7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM?<br />

DANCE IS EDUCATIONAL, CULTURAL AND FUN.<br />

Y<br />

WHY?<br />

8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />

NONE<br />

9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />

NONE<br />

8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />

TIME MANAGEMENT.<br />

9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />

NONE<br />

ARTIST: LAURIE KELLER<br />

CONTRACT #: A8014<br />

TITLE OF PROGRAM: AUTHOR/ILLUSTRATOR VISIT<br />

TYPE OF PROGRAM: ASSEMBLY<br />

DISTRICT/ SCHOOL:<br />

# OF TEACHERS: 4<br />

IRVINGTON/DOWS LANE ELEM.<br />

# OF STUDENTS: 473 GRADE(S) K-3<br />

DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 12/2/11<br />

NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />

STANDARD 1 STANDARD 2 STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />

ARTIST: LAURIE KELLER<br />

CONTRACT #: A8390<br />

TITLE OF PROGRAM: AUTHOR/ILLUSTRATOR VISIT<br />

TYPE OF PROGRAM: ASSEMBLY<br />

DISTRICT/ SCHOOL: KATONAH/LEWISBORO/LEWISBORO ELEM.<br />

# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />

# OF STUDENTS: GRADE(S) K-2<br />

DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 3/28/12<br />

NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />

STANDARD 1 STANDARD 2 STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />

1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />

1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />

1.<br />

2.<br />

3.<br />

4.<br />

5.<br />

6.<br />

STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />

ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />

EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />

ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />

TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />

QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />

5<br />

5<br />

4<br />

5<br />

5<br />

4<br />

7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />

SHE EXPLAINED HER CREATIVE PROCESS AND SHOWED HOW SHE<br />

CREATED CHARACTERS. THEY SAW THEMSELVES AS ARTISTS.<br />

8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />

PERHAPS FOCUS ON WRITING PROCESS A LITTLE MORE.<br />

9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />

MS. KELLER WAS WONDERFUL. SHE SKILLFULLY ADAPTED HER<br />

PRESENTATION FOR THE DEVELOPMENTAL LEVEL OF THE DIVERSE<br />

STUDENTS. TEACHERS AND STUDENTS WERE DELIGHTED.<br />

1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />

2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />

3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />

4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />

5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />

6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />

7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />

NONE<br />

8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />

NONE<br />

9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />

NONE<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

Arts in Education Service - School Evaluations <strong>2011</strong>-<strong>2012</strong><br />

Page 193 of 332


ARTIST: LAURIE KELLER<br />

CONTRACT #: A8686<br />

TITLE OF PROGRAM: AUTHOR/ILLUSTRATOR VISIT<br />

TYPE OF PROGRAM: ASSEMBLY<br />

DISTRICT/ SCHOOL:<br />

# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />

SOMERS/PRIMROSE ELEM.<br />

# OF STUDENTS: 255 GRADE(S) 1<br />

DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 3/29/12<br />

NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />

STANDARD 1 STANDARD 2 STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />

1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />

ARTIST: LAWRENCE ALEXANDER<br />

CONTRACT #: A8665<br />

TITLE OF PROGRAM: SOUND DESIGNER FOR THE SHOW - A FUNNY THING<br />

HAPPENED ON THE WAY TO THE FORUM<br />

TYPE OF PROGRAM: RESIDENCY<br />

DISTRICT/ SCHOOL: PUTNAM VALLEY/PUTNAM VALLEY HIGH SCHOOL<br />

# OF TEACHERS: 3<br />

# OF STUDENTS: 400 GRADE(S) 9-12<br />

DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 4/12-23/12<br />

NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />

STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />

1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />

1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />

2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />

3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />

4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />

5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />

6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />

7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />

HER PRESENTATION WAS CHILD FRIENDLY AND INTERACTIVE.<br />

CHILDREN WERE VERY ENGAGED.<br />

8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />

NONE<br />

9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />

NONE<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

4<br />

1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />

2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />

3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />

4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />

5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />

6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />

7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />

NONE<br />

8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />

NONE<br />

9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />

NONE<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

ARTIST: LAWRENCE D'AMICO<br />

CONTRACT #: A8315<br />

TITLE OF PROGRAM: A MURAL TIME LINE OF ART & HISTORY<br />

TYPE OF PROGRAM: RESIDENCY<br />

DISTRICT/ SCHOOL: LAKELAND/COPPER BEECH MIDDLE SCHOOL<br />

# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />

# OF STUDENTS: GRADE(S) 8<br />

DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 2/22-3/14/12<br />

NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />

STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 X STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4 X<br />

ARTIST: LEORA COHEN<br />

CONTRACT #: A8448B<br />

TITLE OF PROGRAM: KIDS ON THE BLOCK<br />

TYPE OF PROGRAM: ASSEMBLY<br />

DISTRICT/ SCHOOL: NEW ROCHELLE/DAVIS ELEM. SCHOOL<br />

# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />

# OF STUDENTS: 125 GRADE(S) 3<br />

DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 2/27/12<br />

NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />

STANDARD 1 STANDARD 2 STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4 X<br />

1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />

1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />

1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />

2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />

3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />

4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />

5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />

6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />

7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />

HE TOTALLY ENGAGED THE STUDENTS. HE WAS ABLE TO HELP<br />

THE STUDENTS ACHIEVE A LEVEL OF CREATIVITY THAT THEY<br />

WERE UNAWARE THEY COULD ACCOMPLISH. THE END RESULT<br />

WAS AMAZING.<br />

8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />

NONE<br />

9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />

NONE<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

1.<br />

2.<br />

3.<br />

4.<br />

5.<br />

6.<br />

STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />

ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />

EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />

ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />

TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />

QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />

IT IS AN EXCELLENT TOOL FOR TEACHING TOLERANCE, RESPECT,<br />

ETC.<br />

8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />

NONE<br />

9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />

NONE<br />

Arts in Education Service - School Evaluations <strong>2011</strong>-<strong>2012</strong><br />

Page 194 of 332


ARTIST: LEORA COHEN<br />

CONTRACT #: A7670B<br />

TITLE OF PROGRAM: KIDS ON THE BLOCK<br />

TYPE OF PROGRAM: ASSEMBLY<br />

DISTRICT/ SCHOOL:<br />

# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />

BREWSTER/JFK ELEM.<br />

# OF STUDENTS: GRADE(S) 3<br />

DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 11/19/11<br />

NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />

STANDARD 1 STANDARD 2 STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />

ARTIST: LEORA COHEN<br />

CONTRACT #: A8121B<br />

TITLE OF PROGRAM: KIDS ON THE BLOCK<br />

TYPE OF PROGRAM: ASSEMBLY<br />

DISTRICT/ SCHOOL: KATONAH/LEWISBORO/KATONAH ELEM. SCHOOL<br />

# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />

# OF STUDENTS: GRADE(S) 3<br />

DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 3/8/12<br />

NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />

STANDARD 1 STANDARD 2 STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />

1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />

1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />

1.<br />

2.<br />

3.<br />

4.<br />

5.<br />

6.<br />

STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />

ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />

EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />

ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />

TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />

QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />

GREAT SHOW IN A CHILD FRIENDLY MANNER WITH A WONDERFUL<br />

MESSAGE.<br />

8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />

NONE<br />

9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />

NONE<br />

ARTIST: LEORA COHEN<br />

TITLE OF PROGRAM: KIDS ON THE BLOCK<br />

TYPE OF PROGRAM: ASSEMBLY<br />

DISTRICT/ SCHOOL:<br />

CHAPPAQUA/GRAFFLIN ELEM.<br />

CONTRACT #: A7810B<br />

# OF TEACHERS: 5<br />

# OF STUDENTS: 105 GRADE(S) 3<br />

DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE<br />

5/4/12<br />

NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />

STANDARD 1 STANDARD 2 STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />

1.<br />

2.<br />

3.<br />

4.<br />

5.<br />

6.<br />

STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />

ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />

EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />

ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />

TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />

QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />

THIS PROGRAM WAS AN EXCELLENT WAY TO INTEGRATE A<br />

DISCUSSION ON LEARNING DIFFERENCES AND ACCEPTANCE WITH<br />

OUR CLASSES.<br />

8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />

NONE<br />

9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />

ARTIST:<br />

GREAT PRESENTATION. I LIKED THE ADDITION OF<br />

COMPREHENSION QUESTIONS FOLLOWING THE SHOW. THE<br />

STUDENTS REALLY SEEMED TO ENJOY BEING ABLE TO PROCESS.<br />

LIDO DECK PRODUCTIONS - NEAL SCH<br />

TITLE OF PROGRAM: AUTHOR VISIT<br />

TYPE OF PROGRAM: ASSEMBLY<br />

DISTRICT/ SCHOOL:<br />

SOMERS/SOMERS MIDDLE SCHOOL<br />

CONTRACT #: A8409<br />

# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />

# OF STUDENTS: 580 GRADE(S) 7 & 8<br />

DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 3/30/12<br />

NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />

STANDARD 1 STANDARD 2 STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />

1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />

1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />

1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />

2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />

3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />

4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />

5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />

6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />

5<br />

4<br />

5<br />

5<br />

4<br />

5<br />

1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />

2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />

3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />

4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />

5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />

6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

N/<br />

7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />

STUDENTS LEARNED A LOT FROM THIS PRESENTATION.<br />

7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />

STUDENTS LOVE HIS BOOKS AND HAD LOTS OF QUESTIONS.<br />

8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />

NONE<br />

9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />

NONE<br />

8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />

NONE<br />

9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />

NONE<br />

Arts in Education Service - School Evaluations <strong>2011</strong>-<strong>2012</strong><br />

Page 195 of 332


ARTIST: LINCOLN CENTER INSTITUTE<br />

CONTRACT #: A8277B<br />

TITLE OF PROGRAM: AARON DRAPER - FIESTA FLAMENCA<br />

TYPE OF PROGRAM: RESIDENCY<br />

DISTRICT/ SCHOOL: NEW ROCHELLE/DANIEL WEBSTER ELEM.<br />

# OF TEACHERS: 2<br />

# OF STUDENTS: GRADE(S) K & 1<br />

DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE APRIL, <strong>2012</strong><br />

NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />

STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 X STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4 X<br />

ARTIST: LINDA DUCI-KILIK<br />

CONTRACT #: A8350<br />

TITLE OF PROGRAM: CHOREOGRAPHER FOR SENIOR MUSICAL - XANADU<br />

TYPE OF PROGRAM: RESIDENCY<br />

DISTRICT/ SCHOOL: CHAPPAQUA/HORACE GREELEY HIGH SCHOOL<br />

# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />

# OF STUDENTS: 200 GRADE(S) 12<br />

DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 1/30-4/21/12<br />

NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />

STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 X STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />

1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />

1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />

1.<br />

2.<br />

3.<br />

4.<br />

5.<br />

6.<br />

STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />

ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />

EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />

ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />

TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />

QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />

A GREAT PART OF AN INDEPTH MINI UNIT FOR OUR SECOND GRADE<br />

SPANISH CLASSES.<br />

8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />

NONE<br />

9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />

FANTASTIC.<br />

ARTIST: LINDA DUCI-KILIK<br />

CONTRACT #: A8525<br />

TITLE OF PROGRAM: CHOREOGRAPHER FOR THE MUSICAL - ONCE UPON<br />

A MATTRESS<br />

TYPE OF PROGRAM: RESIDENCY<br />

DISTRICT/ SCHOOL:<br />

SOMERS/SOMERS HIGH SCHOOL<br />

# OF TEACHERS: 2<br />

# OF STUDENTS: 50 GRADE(S) 9-12<br />

DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE<br />

2/13-3/18/12<br />

NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />

STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 X STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />

1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />

2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />

3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />

4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />

5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />

6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />

7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />

IMPORTANT FOR STUDENTS TO LEARN AND SEE HOW ALL THE<br />

COMPONENTS OF A MUSICAL SHOW COME TOGETHER.<br />

8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />

NONE<br />

9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />

ARTIST:<br />

LINDA IS EXTREMELY TALENTED AND DEDICATED TO HER CRAFT.<br />

SHE IS AN EXCEPTIONAL CHOREOGRAPHER WITH A RARE GIFT OF<br />

BEING ABLE TO TEACH STUDENTS WITH VARYING LEVELS OF<br />

DANCE, MOVEMENT, KNOWLEDGE AND ABILITIES.<br />

LINDA DUCI-KILIK<br />

CONTRACT #: A7590<br />

TITLE OF PROGRAM: CHOREOGRAPHER FOR THE SHOW - THE DROWSY<br />

CHAPERONE<br />

TYPE OF PROGRAM: RESIDENCY<br />

DISTRICT/ SCHOOL:<br />

CHAPPAQUA/HORACE GREELEY HIGH SCHOOL<br />

# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />

# OF STUDENTS: 27 GRADE(S) 9-12<br />

DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 9/13-11/19/11<br />

NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />

STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 X STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />

1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />

1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />

2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />

3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />

4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />

5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />

6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />

2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />

3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />

4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />

5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />

6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM?<br />

NONE<br />

Y<br />

WHY?<br />

7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y<br />

LINDA IS A GIFTED AND DEDICATED CHOREOGRAPHER.<br />

WHY?<br />

8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />

NONE<br />

9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />

NONE<br />

8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />

NONE<br />

9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />

I LOOK FORWARD TO WORKING WITH LINDA AGAIN.<br />

Arts in Education Service - School Evaluations <strong>2011</strong>-<strong>2012</strong><br />

Page 196 of 332


ARTIST: LINDA RUSSELL<br />

CONTRACT #: A8184<br />

TITLE OF PROGRAM: COLONIAL STORIES, MUSIC AND MORE<br />

TYPE OF PROGRAM: WORKSHOP<br />

DISTRICT/ SCHOOL: IRVINGTON/MAIN STREET SCHOOL<br />

# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />

# OF STUDENTS: 130 GRADE(S) 4<br />

DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 3/14/12<br />

NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />

STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 X STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4 X<br />

ARTIST: LINDA SABATELLI CARELLI<br />

CONTRACT #: A8111<br />

TITLE OF PROGRAM: CHOREOGRAPHER FOR THE SHOW - SEUSSICAL<br />

TYPE OF PROGRAM: RESIDENCY<br />

DISTRICT/ SCHOOL: CHAPPAQUA/SEVEN BRIDGES MIDDLE SCHOOL<br />

# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />

# OF STUDENTS: 103 GRADE(S) 5-8<br />

DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 12/15/11-2/13/12<br />

NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />

STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 X STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />

1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />

1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />

1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />

2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />

3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />

4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />

5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />

6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />

7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />

THE IS GREAT FOR OUR 4TH GRADE COLONIAL DAY.<br />

8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />

NONE<br />

9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />

GREAT JOB ONCE AGAIN.<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

N/<br />

1.<br />

2.<br />

3.<br />

4.<br />

5.<br />

6.<br />

STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />

ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />

EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />

ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />

TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />

QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />

SHE DELIVERED A PROFESSIONAL EXPERIENCE THAT YIELDED<br />

HEIGHTENED SKILLS AND CONFIDENCE IN THE STUDENTS. PLUS<br />

THEY HAD A LOT OF FUN.<br />

8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />

NONE<br />

9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />

NONE<br />

ARTIST: LINDA SUE PARK<br />

CONTRACT #: A7598<br />

TITLE OF PROGRAM: AUTHOR VISIT<br />

TYPE OF PROGRAM: ASSEMBLY<br />

DISTRICT/ SCHOOL: YORKTOWN/MILDRED STRANG MIDDLE SCHOOL<br />

# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />

# OF STUDENTS: GRADE(S) 6<br />

DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 10/11/11<br />

NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />

STANDARD 1 STANDARD 2 STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />

ARTIST: LISA EDHEIMER<br />

CONTRACT #: A8204<br />

TITLE OF PROGRAM: FASHION DESIGNS & CREATIONS<br />

TYPE OF PROGRAM: WORKSHOP<br />

DISTRICT/ SCHOOL: CHAPPAQUA/ROARING BROOK ELEM.<br />

# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />

# OF STUDENTS: 10 GRADE(S) 3 & 4<br />

DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 1/12-3/8/12<br />

NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />

STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 X STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />

1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />

1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />

1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />

2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />

3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />

4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />

5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />

6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />

7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />

EXCELLENT PROGRAM. SHE ENGAGES THE STUDENTS DURING<br />

HER PRESENTATION IN A POSITIVE MANNER.<br />

8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />

NONE<br />

9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />

GREAT JOB. FOR ALL THREE ASSEMBLIES THE STUDENTS WERE<br />

WELL PREPARED.<br />

4<br />

N/<br />

N/<br />

5<br />

5<br />

4<br />

1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />

2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />

3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />

4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />

5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />

6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />

7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />

LISA DESIGNS WONDERFUL PROJECTS.<br />

8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />

NONE<br />

9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />

NONE<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

Arts in Education Service - School Evaluations <strong>2011</strong>-<strong>2012</strong><br />

Page 197 of 332


ARTIST: LISA GRAFF<br />

CONTRACT #: A8756<br />

TITLE OF PROGRAM: AUTHOR VISIT<br />

TYPE OF PROGRAM: ASSEMBLY/WORKSHOP<br />

DISTRICT/ SCHOOL: SOMERS/SOMERS INTERMEDIATE SCHOOL<br />

# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />

# OF STUDENTS: 830 GRADE(S) 3<br />

DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 4/16/12<br />

NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />

STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 X STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />

ARTIST: LISA HARDE<br />

CONTRACT #: A8108<br />

TITLE OF PROGRAM: COSTUME DESIGNER FOR THE SHOW - BARNUM<br />

TYPE OF PROGRAM: RESIDENCY<br />

DISTRICT/ SCHOOL: NORTH SALEM/NORTH SALEM MS & HS<br />

# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />

# OF STUDENTS: 51 GRADE(S) 6-12<br />

DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 12/5/11-2/12/12<br />

NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />

STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 X STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />

1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />

1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />

1.<br />

2.<br />

3.<br />

4.<br />

5.<br />

6.<br />

STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />

ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />

EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />

ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />

TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />

QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />

LISA'S BOOKS ARE PERFECT MIDDLE GRADE READERS AND SHE IS<br />

VERY ENGAGING.<br />

8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />

NONE<br />

9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />

NONE<br />

1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />

2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />

3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />

4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />

5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />

6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />

7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />

LISA'S DRIVE AND PASSION FOR HER WORK IS INCREDIBLE AND<br />

CONTAGIOUS TO STUDENTS.<br />

8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />

WE NEED TO WORK TIMETABLES BETTER SO STUDENTS ARE<br />

COMFORTABLE WITH TECHNICAL ASPECTS OF PRODUCTION<br />

SOONER.<br />

9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />

NONE<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

ARTIST: LORI SIEGEL<br />

CONTRACT #: A8787<br />

TITLE OF PROGRAM: MUSIC & MOVEMENT - READ ALOUD<br />

TYPE OF PROGRAM: RESIDENCY<br />

DISTRICT/ SCHOOL: NEW ROCHELLE/DANIEL WEBSTER ELEM.<br />

# OF TEACHERS: 2<br />

# OF STUDENTS: 13 GRADE(S) 3-5<br />

DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 5/31-6/14/12<br />

NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />

STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 X STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />

1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />

ARTIST: LORRAINE DRAGER-BAKER<br />

CONTRACT #: A8715<br />

TITLE OF PROGRAM: WOODWIND PLAYER FOR THE SHOW - A FUNNY<br />

THING HAPPENED ON THE WAY TO THE FORUM<br />

TYPE OF PROGRAM: ASSEMBLY<br />

DISTRICT/ SCHOOL: PUTNAM VALLEY/PUTNAM VALLEY HIGH SCHOOL<br />

# OF TEACHERS: 3<br />

# OF STUDENTS: 400 GRADE(S) 9-12<br />

DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 4/13-23/12<br />

NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />

STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />

1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />

1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />

2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />

3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />

4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />

5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />

6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />

7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />

NONE<br />

8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />

NONE<br />

9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />

NONE<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />

2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />

3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />

4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />

5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />

6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />

7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />

NONE<br />

8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />

NONE<br />

9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />

NONE<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

N/<br />

Arts in Education Service - School Evaluations <strong>2011</strong>-<strong>2012</strong><br />

Page 198 of 332


ARTIST: LORRAINE DRAGER-BAKER<br />

CONTRACT #: A8660<br />

TITLE OF PROGRAM: WOODWIND PLAYER FOR THE SHOW - ONCE UPON A<br />

MATTRESS<br />

TYPE OF PROGRAM: ASSEMBLY<br />

DISTRICT/ SCHOOL:<br />

# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />

SOMERS/SOMERS HIGH SCHOOL<br />

# OF STUDENTS: 50 GRADE(S) 9-12<br />

DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 3/12-18/12<br />

NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />

STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />

1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />

ARTIST: LOU DEL BIANCO<br />

CONTRACT #: A7799A<br />

TITLE OF PROGRAM: ABE LINCOLN<br />

TYPE OF PROGRAM: ASSEMBLY<br />

DISTRICT/ SCHOOL: EASTCHESTER/WAVERLY EARLY CHILDHOOD CTR<br />

# OF TEACHERS: 8<br />

# OF STUDENTS: 246 GRADE(S) K<br />

DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 2/2/12<br />

NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />

STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />

1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />

1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />

2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />

3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />

4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />

5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />

6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />

7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />

NONE<br />

8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />

NONE<br />

9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />

NONE<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

1.<br />

2.<br />

3.<br />

4.<br />

5.<br />

6.<br />

STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />

ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />

EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />

ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />

TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />

QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />

4<br />

4<br />

4<br />

4<br />

4<br />

4<br />

7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />

INTERACTIVE AND FUN LESSONS BEING TAUGHT. CHILDREN ARE<br />

ENGAGED, ENTERTAINED, AND HE HAD GREAT MANAGEMENT OF<br />

THE AUDIENCE.<br />

8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />

MORE ANIMATION AND/OR MUSIC MOVEMENT ACTIVITIES.<br />

9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />

A LITTLE TOO LONG FOR THIS GRADE LEVEL.<br />

ARTIST: LOU DEL BIANCO<br />

CONTRACT #: A8009<br />

TITLE OF PROGRAM: ANCIENT MYTHS FROM AROUND THE WORLD<br />

TYPE OF PROGRAM: ASSEMBLY<br />

DISTRICT/ SCHOOL:<br />

# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />

MTP/WESTLAKE MIDDLE SCHOOL<br />

# OF STUDENTS: GRADE(S) 6<br />

DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 12/1/11<br />

NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />

STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4 X<br />

ARTIST: LOU DEL BIANCO<br />

CONTRACT #: A8450<br />

TITLE OF PROGRAM: AROUND THE WORLD<br />

TYPE OF PROGRAM: ASSEMBLY<br />

DISTRICT/ SCHOOL:<br />

# OF TEACHERS: 6<br />

BRIARCLIFF/TODD ELEM.<br />

# OF STUDENTS: GRADE(S) K-5<br />

DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 2/27/12<br />

NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />

STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4 X<br />

1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />

1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />

1.<br />

2.<br />

3.<br />

4.<br />

5.<br />

6.<br />

STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />

ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />

EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />

ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />

TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />

QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />

5<br />

5<br />

3<br />

5<br />

5<br />

N/<br />

7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />

STUDENTS CLEARLY ENJOY THIS PROGRAM. WITHIN OUR SOCIAL<br />

STUDIES CURRICULUM WE TEACH ANCIENT CIVILIZATIONS SO<br />

STUDENTS WERE FAMILIAR WITH SOME OF THE CONTENT.<br />

8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />

NONE<br />

9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />

NONE<br />

1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />

2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />

3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />

4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />

5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />

6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />

7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />

HIGHLY RECOMMEND.<br />

8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />

NONE<br />

9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />

MUCH POSITIVE FEEDBACK WAS GIVEN BY STAFF AND STUDENTS.<br />

5<br />

5<br />

4<br />

5<br />

4<br />

3<br />

Arts in Education Service - School Evaluations <strong>2011</strong>-<strong>2012</strong><br />

Page 199 of 332


ARTIST: LOU DEL BIANCO<br />

CONTRACT #: A7799B<br />

TITLE OF PROGRAM: AROUND THE WORLD<br />

TYPE OF PROGRAM: ASSEMBLY<br />

DISTRICT/ SCHOOL: EASTCHESTER/WAVERLY EARLY CHILDHOOD CTR<br />

# OF TEACHERS: 12 # OF STUDENTS: 245 GRADE(S) K<br />

DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 6/1/12<br />

NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />

STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4 X<br />

ARTIST: LOU DEL BIANCO<br />

CONTRACT #: A8078<br />

TITLE OF PROGRAM: MAKE A GOOD CHOICE<br />

TYPE OF PROGRAM: ASSEMBLY<br />

DISTRICT/ SCHOOL:<br />

# OF TEACHERS: 23<br />

LAKELAND/LINCOLN-TITUS ELEM.<br />

# OF STUDENTS: 482 GRADE(S) K-5<br />

DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 2/15/12<br />

NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />

STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />

1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />

1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />

1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />

2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />

3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />

4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />

5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />

6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />

7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />

THIS WAS AN INTERACTIVE SHOW WHICH INVOLVED LOU<br />

ENGAGING THE AUDIENCE WITH SONGS. STUDENTS STOOD,<br />

SNAPPED THEIR FINGERS AND DANCED WITH HIM. THEY WERE<br />

ACTIVELY ENGAGED AND DID NOT GROW RESTLESS.<br />

8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />

NONE<br />

9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />

AN ANNUAL FAVORITE.<br />

5<br />

5<br />

3<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

1.<br />

2.<br />

3.<br />

4.<br />

5.<br />

6.<br />

STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />

ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />

EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />

ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />

TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />

QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

N/<br />

7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />

LOU'S PERFORMANCE WAS INTERACTIVE, ENGAGING, ENERGETIC<br />

AND VERY AGE APPROPRIATE. THE THEME OF MAKING GOOD<br />

CHOICES SUPPORTED OUR CHARACTER ED PBIS PROGRAM.<br />

8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />

NONE<br />

9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />

WE HIGHLY RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM TO ALL. THE CHILDREN<br />

WERE TOTALLY ENGROSSED FOR THE ENTIRE TIME.<br />

ARTIST: LOU DEL BIANCO<br />

CONTRACT #: A7511<br />

TITLE OF PROGRAM: MAKE A GOOD CHOICE<br />

TYPE OF PROGRAM: ASSEMBLY<br />

DISTRICT/ SCHOOL:<br />

# OF TEACHERS: 6<br />

CHAPPAQUA/GRAFFLIN ELEM.<br />

# OF STUDENTS: 128 GRADE(S) K-4<br />

DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 9/16/11<br />

NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />

STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />

ARTIST: LOU DEL BIANCO<br />

CONTRACT #: A7573B<br />

TITLE OF PROGRAM: MAKE A GOOD CHOICE<br />

TYPE OF PROGRAM: ASSEMBLY/WORKSHOP<br />

DISTRICT/ SCHOOL:<br />

# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />

BYRAM HILLS/COMAN HILL ELEM.<br />

# OF STUDENTS: 507 GRADE(S) K-2<br />

DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 9/28/11<br />

NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />

STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />

1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />

1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />

1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />

2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />

3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />

4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />

5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />

6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />

7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />

STUDENTS WERE ENGAGED AND ENJOYED THE PROGRAM.<br />

LOVELY, HUMOROUS AND APPROPRIATE FOR THE AGE GROUP.<br />

8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />

WE SAW THE SAME PROGRAM LAST YEAR SO SOME CHANGES<br />

WOULD HAVE BEEN NICE.<br />

9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />

MESSAGE WAS GOOD BUT SEEMED A BIT OLD FASHIONED FOR<br />

TODAY'S YOUTH.<br />

4<br />

4<br />

4<br />

4<br />

4<br />

N/<br />

1.<br />

2.<br />

3.<br />

4.<br />

5.<br />

6.<br />

STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />

ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />

EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />

ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />

TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />

QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />

TALKS ABOUT GOOD CHOICES. NICE WAY TO KICK OFF SCHOOL<br />

YEAR.<br />

8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />

NONE<br />

9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />

NONE<br />

Arts in Education Service - School Evaluations <strong>2011</strong>-<strong>2012</strong><br />

Page 200 of 332


ARTIST: LOU DEL BIANCO<br />

CONTRACT #: A7955<br />

TITLE OF PROGRAM: MAKE A GOOD CHOICE<br />

TYPE OF PROGRAM: ASSEMBLY<br />

DISTRICT/ SCHOOL: LAKELAND/GEORGE WASHINGTON ELEM.<br />

# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />

# OF STUDENTS: 180 GRADE(S) K-2<br />

DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 12/8/11<br />

NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />

STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />

ARTIST: LOU DEL BIANCO<br />

CONTRACT #: A8681<br />

TITLE OF PROGRAM: MAKE A GOOD CHOICE<br />

TYPE OF PROGRAM: ASSEMBLY<br />

DISTRICT/ SCHOOL: EASTCHESTER/WAVERLY EARLY CHILDHOOD CTR<br />

# OF TEACHERS: 10 # OF STUDENTS: 225 GRADE(S) 1<br />

DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 4/5/12<br />

NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />

STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />

1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />

1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />

1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />

2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />

3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />

4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />

5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />

6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />

7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />

CHILDREN WERE ENGAGED AND INVOLVED.<br />

8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />

NONE<br />

9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />

WE LOOK FORWARD TO HAVING LOU BACK.<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

N/<br />

1.<br />

2.<br />

3.<br />

4.<br />

5.<br />

6.<br />

STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />

ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />

EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />

ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />

TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />

QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />

LOU DOES A WONDERFUL JOB ENGAGING THE STUDENTS AND<br />

HOLDING THEIR ATTENTION THROUGHTOUT THE PERFORMANCE.<br />

HE PRESENTED THE STUDENTS WITH SCENARIOS FROM HIS OWN<br />

CHILDHOOD AND ASKED THE STUDENTS TO THINK ABOUT HOW<br />

THEY COULD MAKE A GOOD CHOICE IF PRESENTED WITH A<br />

SIMILAR SCENARIO.<br />

8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />

NONE<br />

9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />

THE PROGRAM IS INTERACTIVE WITH A GREAT DEAL OF HUMOR,<br />

MUSIC, MOVEMENT AND AUDIENCE PARTICIPATION. IT IS PERFECT<br />

FOR THIS AGE GROUP AND IT ENHANCED AND SUPPORTED<br />

CHARACTER EDUCATION. IT ALSO PROMOTEED RESPECT,<br />

RESPONSIBILITY AND THINKING CAREFULLY ABOUT THE CHOICES<br />

THAT YOU MAKE.<br />

ARTIST: LOU DEL BIANCO<br />

CONTRACT #: A7933<br />

TITLE OF PROGRAM: MAKE A GOOD CHOICE<br />

TYPE OF PROGRAM: ASSEMBLY<br />

DISTRICT/ SCHOOL:<br />

# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />

SOMERS/PRIMROSE ELEM.<br />

# OF STUDENTS: 723 GRADE(S) K-2<br />

DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 10/26/11<br />

NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />

STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />

ARTIST: LOU DEL BIANCO<br />

CONTRACT #: A7600<br />

TITLE OF PROGRAM: MAKE A GOOD CHOICE<br />

TYPE OF PROGRAM: ASSEMBLY<br />

DISTRICT/ SCHOOL: CHAPPAQUA/WESTORCHARD ELEM.<br />

# OF TEACHERS: 5<br />

# OF STUDENTS: 509 GRADE(S) K-4<br />

DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 9/14/11<br />

NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />

STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />

1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />

1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />

1.<br />

2.<br />

3.<br />

4.<br />

5.<br />

6.<br />

STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />

ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />

EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />

ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />

TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />

QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />

IT HAD GREAT MESSAGES FOR CHILDREN. THE STUDENTS WERE<br />

ENGAGED AND IT FIT NICELY WITHIN SCHOOL THEME.<br />

8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />

NONE<br />

9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />

NONE<br />

1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />

2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />

3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />

4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />

5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />

6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />

7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />

GREAT SHOW, GOOD MESSAGES.<br />

8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />

MORE VISUAL FOR YOUNGER K-1.<br />

9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />

NONE<br />

4<br />

5<br />

4<br />

5<br />

4<br />

5<br />

Arts in Education Service - School Evaluations <strong>2011</strong>-<strong>2012</strong><br />

Page 201 of 332


ARTIST: LOU DEL BIANCO<br />

CONTRACT #: A7653<br />

TITLE OF PROGRAM: MAKE A GOOD CHOICE<br />

TYPE OF PROGRAM: ASSEMBLY<br />

DISTRICT/ SCHOOL:<br />

# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />

OSSINING/PARK SCHOOL<br />

# OF STUDENTS: GRADE(S) PRE K &<br />

DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 6/20/12<br />

NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />

STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />

ARTIST: LOU DEL BIANCO<br />

CONTRACT #: A7573A<br />

TITLE OF PROGRAM: STORYTELLING WORKSHOP<br />

TYPE OF PROGRAM: WORKSHOP<br />

DISTRICT/ SCHOOL:<br />

# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />

BYRAM HILLS/COMAN HILL ELEM.<br />

# OF STUDENTS: GRADE(S) 2<br />

DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 9/23 & 27/11<br />

NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />

STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 X STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />

1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />

1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />

1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />

2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />

3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />

4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />

5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />

6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />

7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />

NONE<br />

8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />

NONE<br />

9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />

NONE<br />

3<br />

3<br />

3<br />

4<br />

4<br />

N/<br />

1.<br />

2.<br />

3.<br />

4.<br />

5.<br />

6.<br />

STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />

ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />

EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />

ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />

TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />

QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />

I WOULD DEFINITELY RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM. LOU IS<br />

ENGAGING, HUMOROUS AND FUN ALL WHILE PROVIDING AN<br />

EDUCATIONAL PROGRAM.<br />

8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />

LOU DOES NOT NEED TO IMPROVE IN ANY WAY. HE IS EXCELLENT.<br />

9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />

WE ALWAYS ENJOY HIS WORKSHOPS.<br />

ARTIST: LOU DEL BIANCO<br />

CONTRACT #: A7740<br />

TITLE OF PROGRAM: THANKSGIVING DAY SHOW<br />

TYPE OF PROGRAM: ASSEMBLY<br />

DISTRICT/ SCHOOL: CHAPPAQUA/ROARING BROOK ELEM.<br />

# OF TEACHERS: 4<br />

# OF STUDENTS: 90 GRADE(S) 1<br />

DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 11/21/11<br />

NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />

STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4 X<br />

ARTIST: LOUISE EDEIKEN<br />

CONTRACT #: A8378B<br />

TITLE OF PROGRAM: COMMUNICATION THROUGH SONGS<br />

TYPE OF PROGRAM: RESIDENCY<br />

DISTRICT/ SCHOOL: NEW ROCHELLE/NEW ROCHELLE HS<br />

# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />

# OF STUDENTS: 24 GRADE(S) 9<br />

DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 2/2-3/5/12<br />

NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />

STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 X STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />

1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />

1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />

1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />

2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />

3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />

4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />

5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />

6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />

7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />

ARTIST WAS VERY ENGAGING.<br />

8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />

NONE<br />

9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />

NONE<br />

5<br />

5<br />

N/<br />

5<br />

5<br />

N/<br />

1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />

2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />

3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />

4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />

5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />

6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />

7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />

LOUISE IS ONE OF THE MOST ENGAGING COACHES FOR YOUNG<br />

SINGERS. SHE PROVIDES ERUDITE AND INFORMED OPINIONS.<br />

8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />

TWO WEEK ADVANCE PREPARATION INCLUDING MATERIALS<br />

DESCRIBING LOUISE'S BACKGROUND AND DESCRIPTIONS OF<br />

WHAT THE 42 PERIODS WOULD LOOK LIKE. INCLUDE LIST OF<br />

VOCABULARY WORDS AND HOW TO BEHAVE IN A MASTER CLASS<br />

SITUATION.<br />

9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />

NONE<br />

3<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

3<br />

N/<br />

Arts in Education Service - School Evaluations <strong>2011</strong>-<strong>2012</strong><br />

Page 202 of 332


ARTIST:<br />

LOUISE EDEIKEN<br />

TITLE OF PROGRAM: MUSICAL THEATRE WORKSHOPS<br />

TYPE OF PROGRAM: WORKSHOP<br />

DISTRICT/ SCHOOL:<br />

NEW ROCHELLE/NEW ROCHELLE HS<br />

CONTRACT #: A8378A<br />

# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />

# OF STUDENTS: GRADE(S) 10-12<br />

DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE<br />

2/7-9/12<br />

NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />

STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 X STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />

1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />

1.<br />

2.<br />

3.<br />

4.<br />

5.<br />

6.<br />

STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />

ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />

EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />

ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />

TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />

QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />

LOUISE IS THE CONSUMATE PROFESSIONAL AND KNOWS HOW TO<br />

APPROACH THE CRAFT AND TEACH THE STUDENTS HER SKILLS.<br />

8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />

NONE<br />

9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />

NONE<br />

ARTIST: LUANN ADAMS<br />

CONTRACT #: A8193<br />

TITLE OF PROGRAM: STORYTELLING TALES FROM DR. SEUSS &<br />

CHILDREN OF COURAGE<br />

TYPE OF PROGRAM: ASSEMBLY<br />

DISTRICT/ SCHOOL:<br />

LAKELAND/THOMAS JEFFERSON ELEM.<br />

# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />

# OF STUDENTS: GRADE(S) K-5<br />

DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE<br />

3/1/12<br />

NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />

STANDARD 1 STANDARD 2 STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />

ARTIST: LUANN ADAMS<br />

CONTRACT #: A7742<br />

TITLE OF PROGRAM: STORYTELLING RESIDENCY - CHILDREN OF<br />

COURAGE<br />

TYPE OF PROGRAM: ASSEMBLY/WORKSHOP<br />

DISTRICT/ SCHOOL:<br />

LAKELAND/COPPER BEECH MIDDLE SCHOOL<br />

# OF TEACHERS: 5<br />

# OF STUDENTS: 500 GRADE(S) 6<br />

DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 3/8-22/12<br />

NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />

STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />

1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />

1.<br />

2.<br />

3.<br />

4.<br />

5.<br />

6.<br />

STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />

ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />

EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />

ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />

TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />

QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />

STUDENTS TRULY ENJOY PARTICIPATING AND EVERYONE<br />

INVOLVED LEARNS ABOUT THEMSELVES AND THEIR PEERS IN NEW<br />

WAYS.<br />

8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />

NONE<br />

9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />

CAN'T WAIT FOR NEXT YEAR.<br />

ARTIST: LUBIMA KALIKOVA-SHENTOV<br />

CONTRACT #: A8010<br />

TITLE OF PROGRAM: PERFORMING IN A STRING ORCHESTRA -<br />

WORKSHOPS & SHOWS<br />

TYPE OF PROGRAM: RESIDENCY<br />

DISTRICT/ SCHOOL:<br />

MT.VERNON/LINCOLN ELEM SCHOOL<br />

# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />

# OF STUDENTS: GRADE(S) K-6<br />

DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE NOV., <strong>2011</strong>-MAY, <strong>2012</strong><br />

NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />

STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 X STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4 X<br />

1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />

1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />

1.<br />

2.<br />

3.<br />

4.<br />

5.<br />

6.<br />

STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />

ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />

EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />

ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />

TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />

QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />

4<br />

5<br />

4<br />

4<br />

54<br />

Y<br />

7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />

WE LOVED IT. IT WENT WITH OUR READERS AS LEADERS DAY AND<br />

DR. SEUSS'S BIRTHDAY.<br />

8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />

NONE<br />

9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />

NONE<br />

1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />

2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />

3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />

4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />

5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />

6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />

7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />

NONE<br />

8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />

NONE<br />

9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />

NONE<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

4<br />

4<br />

5<br />

Arts in Education Service - School Evaluations <strong>2011</strong>-<strong>2012</strong><br />

Page 203 of 332


ARTIST: LUDMILA GUFELD<br />

CONTRACT #: A7713<br />

TITLE OF PROGRAM: VIOLIN PLAYER FOR THE SHOW - ANNIE GET YOUR<br />

GUN<br />

TYPE OF PROGRAM: ASSEMBLY<br />

DISTRICT/ SCHOOL: LAKELAND/WALTER PANAS HIGH SCHOOL<br />

# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />

# OF STUDENTS: 100 GRADE(S) 9-12<br />

DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 11/14-19/11<br />

NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />

STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />

1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />

ARTIST: LUDMILA GUFELD<br />

CONTRACT #: A8334<br />

TITLE OF PROGRAM: VIOLIN PLAYER FOR THE SHOW - MY FAIR LADY<br />

TYPE OF PROGRAM: ASSEMBLY<br />

DISTRICT/ SCHOOL: LAKELAND/WALTER PANAS HIGH SCHOOL<br />

# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />

# OF STUDENTS: 200 GRADE(S) 9-12<br />

DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 4/30-5/5/12<br />

NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />

STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />

1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />

1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />

2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />

3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />

4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />

5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />

6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />

7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />

NONE<br />

8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />

NONE<br />

9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />

NONE<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />

2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />

3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />

4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />

5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />

6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />

7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />

NONE<br />

8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />

NONE<br />

9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />

NONE<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

ARTIST: LYNDSEY GARVIN<br />

CONTRACT #: A8023<br />

TITLE OF PROGRAM: HIP HOP & CONTEMPORARY DANCE FOR JAZZ CO<br />

TYPE OF PROGRAM: WORKSHOP<br />

DISTRICT/ SCHOOL: TUCKAHOE/TUCKAHOE HIGH SCHOOL<br />

# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />

# OF STUDENTS: 60 GRADE(S) 9-12<br />

DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 11/28/11-3/3/12<br />

NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />

STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 X STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4 X<br />

ARTIST: LYNNE BARASCH<br />

CONTRACT #: A8453<br />

TITLE OF PROGRAM: AUTHOR/ILLUSTRATOR VISIT<br />

TYPE OF PROGRAM: ASSEMBLY<br />

DISTRICT/ SCHOOL: KATONAH/LEWISBORO/LEWISBORO ELEM.<br />

# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />

# OF STUDENTS: 40 GRADE(S) K<br />

DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 3/2/12<br />

NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />

STANDARD 1 STANDARD 2 STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />

1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />

1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />

1.<br />

2.<br />

3.<br />

4.<br />

5.<br />

6.<br />

STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />

ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />

EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />

ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />

TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />

QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

N/<br />

7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />

DANCE IS AN ART AND ALSO CULTURAL, EDUCATIONAL AND FUN.<br />

8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />

TIME MANAGEMENT.<br />

9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />

NONE<br />

1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />

2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />

3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />

4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />

5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />

6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />

7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />

BETTER FOR GRADES 3 - 5.<br />

8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />

NONE<br />

9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />

WOULD BE A NICE PROGRAM FOR 3RD GRADES SINCE THEY TALK<br />

ABOUT OTHER COUNTRIES.<br />

3<br />

3<br />

3<br />

3<br />

3<br />

3<br />

Arts in Education Service - School Evaluations <strong>2011</strong>-<strong>2012</strong><br />

Page 204 of 332


ARTIST: MARC VON MOLNAR (VON EM)<br />

CONTRACT #: A7881<br />

TITLE OF PROGRAM: MUSICAL SHOW<br />

TYPE OF PROGRAM: ASSEMBLY<br />

DISTRICT/ SCHOOL: CHAPPAQUA/ROARING BROOK ELEM.<br />

# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />

# OF STUDENTS: 75 GRADE(S) K-4<br />

DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 10/26/11<br />

NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />

STANDARD 1 STANDARD 2 STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />

1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />

ARTIST: MARCIA DALEY-SAVO<br />

CONTRACT #: A8245<br />

TITLE OF PROGRAM: SET DESIGNER FOR THE SHOW - THE DROWSY<br />

CHAPERONE<br />

TYPE OF PROGRAM: RESIDENCY<br />

DISTRICT/ SCHOOL: KATONAH/LEWISBORO/JOHN JAY MIDDLE SCHOOL<br />

# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />

# OF STUDENTS: 75 GRADE(S) 6-8<br />

DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 1/15-3/15/12<br />

NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />

STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 X STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />

1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />

1.<br />

2.<br />

3.<br />

4.<br />

5.<br />

6.<br />

STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />

ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />

EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />

ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />

TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />

QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />

5<br />

5<br />

N/<br />

5<br />

5<br />

N/<br />

7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />

MARC HAS A GREAT APPROACH WITH STUDENTS AND CAN ADAPT<br />

TO INTENSE LEVEL AND AGE.<br />

8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />

NONE<br />

9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />

WOULD LOVE TO HAVE HIM BACK.<br />

1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />

2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />

3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />

4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />

5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />

6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />

7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />

THE SETS WERE BEAUTIFUL.<br />

8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />

NONE<br />

9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />

NONE<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

N/<br />

ARTIST: MARCIA DALEY-SAVO<br />

CONTRACT #: A7640<br />

TITLE OF PROGRAM: SET DESIGNER FOR THE SHOW - TWILIGHT ZONE<br />

TYPE OF PROGRAM: RESIDENCY<br />

DISTRICT/ SCHOOL: KATONAH/LEWISBORO/JOHN JAY MIDDLE SCHOOL<br />

# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />

# OF STUDENTS: 43 GRADE(S) 6-8<br />

DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 10/3-11/8/11<br />

NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />

STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 X STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />

ARTIST: MARIA CIARDELLO<br />

CONTRACT #: A8605<br />

TITLE OF PROGRAM: ITALIAN CULTURE, ART & LANGUAGE<br />

TYPE OF PROGRAM: WORKSHOP<br />

DISTRICT/ SCHOOL: EASTCHESTER/GREENVALE ELEM.<br />

# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />

# OF STUDENTS: 10 GRADE(S) 2-5<br />

DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 3/13-5/8/12<br />

NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />

STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 X STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4 X<br />

1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />

1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />

1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />

2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />

3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />

4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />

5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />

6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

N/<br />

1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />

2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />

3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />

4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />

5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />

6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

N/<br />

7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />

THE SETS TURNED OUT GREAT. MANY PEOPLE AND MANY<br />

CHILDREN WORKED TOGETHER TO CREATE A GREAT SHOW.<br />

8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />

NONE<br />

9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />

NONE<br />

7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM?<br />

ALWAYS A FAVORITE.<br />

8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />

NONE<br />

9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />

NONE<br />

Y<br />

WHY?<br />

Arts in Education Service - School Evaluations <strong>2011</strong>-<strong>2012</strong><br />

Page 205 of 332


ARTIST: MARIA CIARDIELLO<br />

CONTRACT #: A7667<br />

TITLE OF PROGRAM: ITALIAN CULTURE, ART & LANGUAGE<br />

TYPE OF PROGRAM: WORKSHOP<br />

DISTRICT/ SCHOOL: EASTCHESTER/GREENVALE ELEM.<br />

# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />

# OF STUDENTS: 16 GRADE(S) 2-5<br />

DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 10/21-12/16/11<br />

NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />

STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 X STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4 X<br />

ARTIST: MARIE HANIUK<br />

CONTRACT #: A8740<br />

TITLE OF PROGRAM: DRAWING<br />

TYPE OF PROGRAM: WORKSHOP<br />

DISTRICT/ SCHOOL:<br />

# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />

NORTH SALEM/PQ ELEM.<br />

# OF STUDENTS: 9 GRADE(S) 3-5<br />

DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 4/16-6/11/12<br />

NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />

STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 X STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />

1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />

1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />

1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />

2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />

3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />

4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />

5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />

6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

N/<br />

1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />

2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />

3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />

4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />

5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />

6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />

MARIA REALLY GAVE CHILDREN A TASTE OF ITALIAN CULTURE<br />

THROUGH SONGS & LANGUAGE.<br />

8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />

NONE<br />

9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />

GREAT CLASS.<br />

7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM?<br />

NONE<br />

8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />

NONE<br />

9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />

NONE<br />

Y<br />

WHY?<br />

ARTIST: MARIE HANIUK<br />

CONTRACT #: A8263<br />

TITLE OF PROGRAM: DRAWING<br />

TYPE OF PROGRAM: WORKSHOP<br />

DISTRICT/ SCHOOL:<br />

# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />

NORTH SALEM/PQ ELEM.<br />

# OF STUDENTS: 9 GRADE(S) 3-5<br />

DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 1/23-3/18/12<br />

NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />

STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 X STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />

ARTIST: MARIO CARTULARA<br />

CONTRACT #: A7627<br />

TITLE OF PROGRAM: ITALIAN CULTURE, ART & LANGUAGE<br />

TYPE OF PROGRAM: WORKSHOP<br />

DISTRICT/ SCHOOL:<br />

# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />

NORTH SALEM/PQ ELEM.<br />

# OF STUDENTS: 9 GRADE(S) K-3<br />

DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 10/5-11/30/11<br />

NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />

STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 X STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4 X<br />

1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />

1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />

1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />

2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />

3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />

4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />

5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />

6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />

2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />

3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />

4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />

5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />

6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM?<br />

NONE<br />

Y<br />

WHY?<br />

7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM?<br />

NONE<br />

Y<br />

WHY?<br />

8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />

NONE<br />

9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />

NONE<br />

8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />

NONE<br />

9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />

NONE<br />

Arts in Education Service - School Evaluations <strong>2011</strong>-<strong>2012</strong><br />

Page 206 of 332


ARTIST: MARIO MARCHESE<br />

CONTRACT #: A8205<br />

TITLE OF PROGRAM: MAGIC / HOCUS POCUS<br />

TYPE OF PROGRAM: WORKSHOP<br />

DISTRICT/ SCHOOL: CHAPPAQUA/ROARING BROOK ELEM.<br />

# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />

# OF STUDENTS: 15 GRADE(S) K-2<br />

DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 1/12-3/8/12<br />

NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />

STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 X STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />

ARTIST: MARION JONES-ARCHER<br />

CONTRACT #: A7905A<br />

TITLE OF PROGRAM: AFRICAN CULTURE & DANCES<br />

TYPE OF PROGRAM: RESIDENCY<br />

DISTRICT/ SCHOOL: MT.VERNON/PARKER ELEM. SCHOOL<br />

# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />

# OF STUDENTS: GRADE(S) K-6<br />

DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE NOV., <strong>2011</strong>-MAY, <strong>2012</strong><br />

NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />

STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 X STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4 X<br />

1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />

1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />

1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />

2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />

3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />

4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />

5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />

6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />

7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />

GREAT INSTRUCTOR.<br />

8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />

SOME OF THE TAKE HOME MATERIALS WERE TO SOPHISTICATED.<br />

9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />

NONE<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

4<br />

1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />

2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />

3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />

4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />

5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />

6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />

7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />

MARION CONTINUES TO BUILD SELF ESTEEM AND EXCITEMENT<br />

FOR CHILDREN AS THEY ARE EXPOSED TO THE ART OF DANCE.<br />

8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />

NONE<br />

9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />

NONE<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

ARTIST: MARION JONES-ARCHER<br />

CONTRACT #: A7905C<br />

TITLE OF PROGRAM: AFRICAN CULTURE & DANCES<br />

TYPE OF PROGRAM: RESIDENCY<br />

DISTRICT/ SCHOOL: MT.VERNON/MT. VERNON HIGH SCHOOL<br />

# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />

# OF STUDENTS: GRADE(S) 9-12<br />

DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE NOV., <strong>2011</strong>-MAY, <strong>2012</strong><br />

NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />

STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 X STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4 X<br />

ARTIST: MARION JONES-ARCHER<br />

CONTRACT #: A7905B<br />

TITLE OF PROGRAM: AFRICAN CULTURE & DANCES<br />

TYPE OF PROGRAM: RESIDENCY<br />

DISTRICT/ SCHOOL: MT.VERNON/DAVIS MIDDLE SCHOOL<br />

# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />

# OF STUDENTS: GRADE(S) 7 & 8<br />

DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE NOV., <strong>2011</strong>-MAY, <strong>2012</strong><br />

NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />

STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 X STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4 X<br />

1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />

1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />

1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />

2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />

3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />

4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />

5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />

6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />

2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />

3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />

4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />

5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />

6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM?<br />

NONE<br />

8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />

NONE<br />

9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />

NONE<br />

Y<br />

WHY?<br />

7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />

MARION CONTINUE TO BRING A SENSE OF CULTURE TO HER<br />

STUDENTS.<br />

8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />

NONE<br />

9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />

NONE<br />

Arts in Education Service - School Evaluations <strong>2011</strong>-<strong>2012</strong><br />

Page 207 of 332


ARTIST: MARION JONES-ARCHER<br />

CONTRACT #: A7862<br />

TITLE OF PROGRAM: AFRICAN CULTURE & DANCES<br />

TYPE OF PROGRAM: RESIDENCY<br />

DISTRICT/ SCHOOL: EASTCHESTER/EASTCHESTER HIGH SCHOOL<br />

# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />

# OF STUDENTS: GRADE(S) 9-12<br />

DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 11/3/11-1/19/12<br />

NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />

STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 X STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4 X<br />

ARTIST: MARION JONES-ARCHER<br />

CONTRACT #: A8024<br />

TITLE OF PROGRAM: AFRICAN JAZZ DANCING<br />

TYPE OF PROGRAM: WORKSHOP<br />

DISTRICT/ SCHOOL: TUCKAHOE/TUCKAHOE HIGH SCHOOL<br />

# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />

# OF STUDENTS: 60 GRADE(S) 9-12<br />

DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 11/28/11-3/3/12<br />

NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />

STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 X STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4 X<br />

1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />

1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />

1.<br />

2.<br />

3.<br />

4.<br />

5.<br />

6.<br />

STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />

ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />

EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />

ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />

TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />

QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />

THE STUDENTS LEARN HOW TO EXPRESS THEMSELVES THROUGH<br />

THE ART OF DANCE.<br />

8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />

NONE<br />

9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />

THE ART WAS PRESENTED IN AN ATTRACTIVE WAY.<br />

1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />

2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />

3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />

4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />

5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />

6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />

7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />

THE STUDENTS WERE CHALLENGED IN A CREATIVE PROCESS.<br />

8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />

NONE<br />

9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />

THE PROGRAM WAS PRESENTED IN AN ENJOYABLE WAY.<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

ARTIST: MARISABINA RUSSO STARK dba MARIS CONTRACT #: A7675<br />

TITLE OF PROGRAM: AUTHOR/ILLUSTRATOR VISIT<br />

TYPE OF PROGRAM: RESIDENCY<br />

DISTRICT/ SCHOOL:<br />

# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />

SOMERS/PRIMROSE ELEM.<br />

# OF STUDENTS: 240 GRADE(S) 1<br />

DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 11/16-18/11<br />

NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />

STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 X STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />

ARTIST: MARISABINA RUSSO STARK dba MARIS CONTRACT #: A8752<br />

TITLE OF PROGRAM: AUTHOR/ILLUSTRATOR VISIT<br />

TYPE OF PROGRAM: ASSEMBLY<br />

DISTRICT/ SCHOOL: PLEASANTVILLE/BEDFORD ROAD ELEM.<br />

# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />

# OF STUDENTS: 130 GRADE(S) 1<br />

DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 4/5/12<br />

NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />

STANDARD 1 STANDARD 2 STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />

1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />

1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />

1.<br />

2.<br />

3.<br />

4.<br />

5.<br />

6.<br />

STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />

ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />

EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />

ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />

TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />

QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

N/<br />

7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />

MS. RUSSO GAVE AN AMAZING PRESENTATION TO THE STUDENTS.<br />

SHE SHOWED THE CREATIVE PROCESS FROM START TO THE<br />

FINISHED PRODUCT.<br />

8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />

NONE<br />

9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />

NONE<br />

1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />

2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />

3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />

4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />

5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />

6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />

7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />

FABULOUS. THE STUDENTS AND STAFF LOVED IT.<br />

8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />

NONE<br />

9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />

NONE<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

Arts in Education Service - School Evaluations <strong>2011</strong>-<strong>2012</strong><br />

Page 208 of 332


ARTIST: MARISABINA RUSSO STARK dba MARIS<br />

CONTRACT #: A8851<br />

TITLE OF PROGRAM: AUTHOR/ILLUSTRATOR VISIT<br />

TYPE OF PROGRAM: RESIDENCY<br />

DISTRICT/ SCHOOL: PUTNAM VALLEY/PUTNAM VALLEY ELEM.<br />

# OF TEACHERS: 6<br />

# OF STUDENTS: 300 GRADE(S) 1 & 2<br />

DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 5/16-18/12<br />

NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />

STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 X STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />

ARTIST: MARISABINA RUSSO STARK dba MARIS CONTRACT #: A7607<br />

TITLE OF PROGRAM: AUTHOR/ILLUSTRATOR VISIT<br />

TYPE OF PROGRAM: ASSEMBLY<br />

DISTRICT/ SCHOOL: HENDRICK HUDSON/FURNACE WOODS ELEM.<br />

# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />

# OF STUDENTS: 41 GRADE(S) K<br />

DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 1/18/12<br />

NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />

STANDARD 1 STANDARD 2 STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />

1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />

1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />

1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />

2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />

3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />

4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />

5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />

6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />

2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />

3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />

4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />

5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />

6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />

TEACHERS LOVED HER SOFT SPOKEN, GENTLE WAY WITH THE<br />

CHILDREN. VERY ENGAGING.<br />

8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />

NONE<br />

9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />

NONE<br />

7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM?<br />

NONE<br />

8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />

NONE<br />

9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />

NONE<br />

Y<br />

WHY?<br />

ARTIST: MARJORIE J. HALL<br />

CONTRACT #: A8228A<br />

TITLE OF PROGRAM: ARTS & CRAFTS / CRAFTY KIDS<br />

TYPE OF PROGRAM: WORKSHOP<br />

DISTRICT/ SCHOOL: KATONAH/LEWISBORO/INCREASE MILLER ELEM.<br />

# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />

# OF STUDENTS: 7 GRADE(S) K-2<br />

DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 1/18-3/14/12<br />

NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />

STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 X STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />

ARTIST: MARJORIE J. HALL<br />

CONTRACT #: A8717B<br />

TITLE OF PROGRAM: FAIRY WORLD CRAFTS<br />

TYPE OF PROGRAM: WORKSHOP<br />

DISTRICT/ SCHOOL: KATONAH/LEWISBORO/INCREASE MILLER ELEM.<br />

# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />

# OF STUDENTS: 11 GRADE(S) K-2<br />

DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 4/12-5/31/12<br />

NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />

STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 X STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />

1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />

1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />

1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />

2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />

3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />

4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />

5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />

6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />

7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />

MARCY IS SO CREATIVE. SHE OFFERS DIFFERENT PROJECTS<br />

EVERY CLASS.<br />

8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />

N0NE<br />

9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />

NONE<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

N/<br />

5<br />

1.<br />

2.<br />

3.<br />

4.<br />

5.<br />

6.<br />

STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />

ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />

EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />

ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />

TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />

QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

N/<br />

5<br />

7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />

WE ARE SO LUCKY TO HAVE MARCY TEACHING AT OUR SCHOOL.<br />

SHE IS A REAL NATURAL WITH STUDENTS AND SHE IS<br />

WONDERFULLY CREATIVE.<br />

8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />

NONE<br />

9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />

NONE<br />

Arts in Education Service - School Evaluations <strong>2011</strong>-<strong>2012</strong><br />

Page 209 of 332


ARTIST: MARK BARDEN<br />

CONTRACT #: A8457<br />

TITLE OF PROGRAM: GUITAR PLAYER FOR THE SHOW - THIRTEEN<br />

COLONIES<br />

TYPE OF PROGRAM: ASSEMBLY<br />

DISTRICT/ SCHOOL: NEW ROCHELLE/DANIEL WEBSTER ELEM.<br />

# OF TEACHERS: 4<br />

# OF STUDENTS: 90 GRADE(S) 2<br />

DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 2/13-15/12<br />

NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />

STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />

1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />

ARTIST: MARK KISTLER<br />

CONTRACT #: A7527<br />

TITLE OF PROGRAM: IMAGINATION STATION SHOW<br />

TYPE OF PROGRAM: ASSEMBLY<br />

DISTRICT/ SCHOOL:<br />

# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />

LAKELAND/VAN CORT ELEM.<br />

# OF STUDENTS: 475 GRADE(S) K-5<br />

DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 11/29/11<br />

NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />

STANDARD 1 STANDARD 2 STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />

1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />

1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />

2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />

3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />

4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />

5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />

6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />

7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />

NONE<br />

8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />

NONE<br />

9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />

NONE<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

1.<br />

2.<br />

3.<br />

4.<br />

5.<br />

6.<br />

STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />

ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />

EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />

ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />

TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />

QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />

WE WOULD HIGHLY RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM TO ANYONE THAT<br />

WANTS TO ENRICH THEIR ART PROGRAM.<br />

8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />

NONE.<br />

9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />

YOUR PROGRAM IS INTERACTIVE AND DYNAMIC. WELL DONE.<br />

ARTIST: MARK KUSHNIR<br />

CONTRACT #: A8563<br />

TITLE OF PROGRAM: VIOLIN PLAYER FOR THE SHOW - BEAUTY AND THE<br />

BEAST<br />

TYPE OF PROGRAM: ASSEMBLY<br />

DISTRICT/ SCHOOL: PLEASANTVILLE/PLEASANTVILLE HIGH SCHOOL<br />

# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />

# OF STUDENTS: 400 GRADE(S) 9-12<br />

DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 3/9-17/12<br />

NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />

STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />

1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />

ARTIST: MARVIN NOVOGRODSKI<br />

CONTRACT #: A7731<br />

TITLE OF PROGRAM: MAGIC OF SCIENCE SHOW<br />

TYPE OF PROGRAM: ASSEMBLY<br />

DISTRICT/ SCHOOL: EASTCHESTER/EASTCHESTER MIDDLE SCHOOL<br />

# OF TEACHERS: 10 # OF STUDENTS: 240 GRADE(S) 6<br />

DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 2/8/12<br />

NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />

STANDARD 1 STANDARD 2 STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />

1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />

1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />

2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />

3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />

4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />

5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />

6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />

7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />

PROFESSIONAL MUSIC QUALITY.<br />

8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />

NONE<br />

9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />

VERY PLEASANT ARTIST TO WORK WITH.<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

N/<br />

1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />

2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />

3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />

4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />

5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />

6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />

7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />

NONE<br />

8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />

NONE<br />

9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />

GREAT SHOW AS USUAL. MARVIN IS ALWAYS VERY RESPONSIVE<br />

TO OUR STUDENTS.<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

Arts in Education Service - School Evaluations <strong>2011</strong>-<strong>2012</strong><br />

Page 210 of 332


ARTIST: MARY DEE MERRELL<br />

CONTRACT #: A8793<br />

TITLE OF PROGRAM: LETS MAKE BOOKS<br />

TYPE OF PROGRAM: RESIDENCY<br />

DISTRICT/ SCHOOL: NEW ROCHELLE/TRINITY ELEM. SCHOOL<br />

# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />

# OF STUDENTS: 175 GRADE(S) 5<br />

DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 5/30-6/14/12<br />

NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />

STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 X STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />

1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />

ARTIST: MARY ELLEN SHEPLEY<br />

CONTRACT #: A8516<br />

TITLE OF PROGRAM: FLUTE & PICCALO PLAYER FOR THE SHOW - BEAUTY<br />

AND THE BEAST<br />

TYPE OF PROGRAM: ASSEMBLY<br />

DISTRICT/ SCHOOL: PLEASANTVILLE/PLEASANTVILLE HIGH SCHOOL<br />

# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />

# OF STUDENTS: 400 GRADE(S) 9-12<br />

DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 3/9-17/12<br />

NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />

STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />

1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />

1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />

2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />

3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />

4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />

5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />

6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />

7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />

SHE IS A WONDERFUL TEACHING ARTIST.<br />

8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />

NONE<br />

9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />

NONE<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

1.<br />

2.<br />

3.<br />

4.<br />

5.<br />

6.<br />

STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />

ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />

EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />

ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />

TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />

QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />

A GREAT SUPPORT FOR KEEPING THE ARTS ALIVE IN EDUCATION.<br />

8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />

NONE<br />

9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />

NONE<br />

ARTIST: MARYGRACE KILLIP<br />

CONTRACT #: A8601<br />

TITLE OF PROGRAM: MIXED MEDIA ART<br />

TYPE OF PROGRAM: WORKSHOP<br />

DISTRICT/ SCHOOL: EASTCHESTER/GREENVALE ELEM.<br />

# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />

# OF STUDENTS: 8 GRADE(S) 3-5<br />

DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 3/9-5/18/12<br />

NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />

STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 X STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />

ARTIST: MARYGRACE KILLIP<br />

CONTRACT #: A7666<br />

TITLE OF PROGRAM: MIXED MEDIA ART<br />

TYPE OF PROGRAM: WORKSHOP<br />

DISTRICT/ SCHOOL: EASTCHESTER/GREENVALE ELEM.<br />

# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />

# OF STUDENTS: 10 GRADE(S) 3-5<br />

DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 10/21-12/16/11<br />

NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />

STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 X STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />

1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />

1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />

1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />

2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />

3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />

4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />

5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />

6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />

2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />

3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />

4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />

5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />

6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

N/<br />

7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM?<br />

NONE<br />

8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />

NONE<br />

9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />

NONE<br />

Y<br />

WHY?<br />

7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />

SHE IS A WONDERFUL TEACHER. CHILDREN FLOURISH IN THIS<br />

CLASS.<br />

8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />

NONE<br />

9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />

AWESOME.<br />

Arts in Education Service - School Evaluations <strong>2011</strong>-<strong>2012</strong><br />

Page 211 of 332


ARTIST: MATTHEW FABLE<br />

CONTRACT #: A8566<br />

TITLE OF PROGRAM: SOUND TECHNICIAN OR THE SHOW - ONCE UPON A<br />

MATTRESS<br />

TYPE OF PROGRAM: RESIDENCY<br />

DISTRICT/ SCHOOL:<br />

# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />

SOMERS/SOMERS HIGH SCHOOL<br />

# OF STUDENTS: GRADE(S) 9-12<br />

DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 3/12-18/12<br />

NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />

STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 X STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />

1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />

ARTIST: MATTHEW HILGENBERG<br />

CONTRACT #: A8680<br />

TITLE OF PROGRAM: TRUMPET PLAYER FOR THE SHOW - GUYS & DOLLS<br />

TYPE OF PROGRAM: ASSEMBLY<br />

DISTRICT/ SCHOOL: KATONAH/LEWISBORO/JOHN JAY HIGH SCHOOL<br />

# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />

# OF STUDENTS: 150 GRADE(S) 9-12<br />

DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 3/22-24/12<br />

NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />

STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />

1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />

1.<br />

2.<br />

3.<br />

4.<br />

5.<br />

6.<br />

STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />

ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />

EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />

ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />

TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />

QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />

2<br />

2<br />

2<br />

2<br />

2<br />

2<br />

7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />

CONTRACTED FOR RUNNING SOUND FOR ALL REHEARSALS AND<br />

PERFORMANCES. THERE WERE PROBLEMS WITH THE SOUND SET<br />

UP THAT WAS NOT CORRECTED UNTIL THE 3RD DAY.<br />

8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />

NONE<br />

9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />

NONE<br />

1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />

2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />

3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />

4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />

5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />

6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />

7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />

NONE<br />

8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />

NONE<br />

9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />

NONE<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

ARTIST: MATTHEW KOWALSKI<br />

CONTRACT #: A7716<br />

TITLE OF PROGRAM: REED PLAYER FOR THE SHOW - ANNIE GET YOUR<br />

GUN<br />

TYPE OF PROGRAM: ASSEMBLY<br />

DISTRICT/ SCHOOL: LAKELAND/WALTER PANAS HIGH SCHOOL<br />

# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />

# OF STUDENTS: 100 GRADE(S) 9-12<br />

DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 11/14-19/11<br />

NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />

STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />

1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />

ARTIST: MATTHEW KOWALSKI<br />

CONTRACT #: A8336<br />

TITLE OF PROGRAM: REED PLAYER FOR THE SHOW - MY FAIR LADY<br />

TYPE OF PROGRAM: ASSEMBLY<br />

DISTRICT/ SCHOOL: LAKELAND/WALTER PANAS HIGH SCHOOL<br />

# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />

# OF STUDENTS: 200 GRADE(S) 9-12<br />

DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 4/30-5/5/12<br />

NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />

STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />

1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />

1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />

2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />

3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />

4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />

5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />

6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />

7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />

A PLEASURE TO HAVE MATT ON BOARD.<br />

8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />

NONE<br />

9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />

NONE<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />

2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />

3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />

4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />

5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />

6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />

7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />

NONE<br />

8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />

NONE<br />

9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />

NONE<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

Arts in Education Service - School Evaluations <strong>2011</strong>-<strong>2012</strong><br />

Page 212 of 332


ARTIST: MATTHEW QUAYLE<br />

CONTRACT #: A8437<br />

TITLE OF PROGRAM: MUSICAL DIRECTOR FOR THE SHOW - A FUNNY<br />

THING HAPPENED ON THE WAY TO THE FORUM<br />

TYPE OF PROGRAM: RESIDENCY<br />

DISTRICT/ SCHOOL: PUTNAM VALLEY/PUTNAM VALLEY HIGH SCHOOL<br />

# OF TEACHERS: 3<br />

# OF STUDENTS: 400 GRADE(S) 9-12<br />

DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 3/3-4/23/12<br />

NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />

STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 X STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />

1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />

ARTIST: MEET THE MUSCIANS, L.L.C.<br />

CONTRACT #: A7937<br />

TITLE OF PROGRAM: DENNIS KOBRAY - BEETHOVEN<br />

TYPE OF PROGRAM: ASSEMBLY<br />

DISTRICT/ SCHOOL: LAKELAND/GEORGE WASHINGTON ELEM.<br />

# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />

# OF STUDENTS: 500 GRADE(S) K-5<br />

DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 3/15/12<br />

NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />

STANDARD 1 STANDARD 2 STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4 X<br />

1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />

1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />

2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />

3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />

4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />

5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />

6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />

7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />

NONE<br />

8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />

NONE<br />

9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />

NONE<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

N/<br />

1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />

2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />

3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />

4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />

5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />

6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />

7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />

HE IS TERRIFIC.<br />

8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />

NONE<br />

9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />

THE CHILDREN REALLY LOOK FORWARD TO HIS PERFORMANCE.<br />

BRAVO.<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

ARTIST: MEET THE MUSCIANS, L.L.C.<br />

CONTRACT #: A7513<br />

TITLE OF PROGRAM: DENNIS KOBRAY - BRAHMS<br />

TYPE OF PROGRAM: ASSEMBLY<br />

DISTRICT/ SCHOOL:<br />

# OF TEACHERS: 5<br />

CHAPPAQUA/GRAFFLIN ELEM.<br />

# OF STUDENTS: 125 GRADE(S) K-4<br />

DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 11/18/11<br />

NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />

STANDARD 1 STANDARD 2 STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4 X<br />

ARTIST: MEET THE MUSCIANS, L.L.C.<br />

CONTRACT #: A7513<br />

TITLE OF PROGRAM: DENNIS KOBRAY - BRAHMS<br />

TYPE OF PROGRAM: ASSEMBLY<br />

DISTRICT/ SCHOOL:<br />

# OF TEACHERS: 5<br />

CHAPPAQUA/GRAFFLIN ELEM.<br />

# OF STUDENTS: 125 GRADE(S) 1<br />

DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 11/18/11<br />

NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />

STANDARD 1 STANDARD 2 STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4 X<br />

1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />

1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />

1.<br />

2.<br />

3.<br />

4.<br />

5.<br />

6.<br />

STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />

ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />

EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />

ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />

TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />

QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />

2<br />

2<br />

3<br />

2<br />

3<br />

N/<br />

7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />

THIS PROGRAM IS NORMALLY VERY GOOD. MAYBE IT WAS THE<br />

CHOICE OF MUSICIAN, BUT THE STUDENTS WERE NOT ENGAGED<br />

AS THEY NORMALLY ARE.<br />

8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />

USING MULTI MEDIA.<br />

9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />

NONE<br />

1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />

2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />

3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />

4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />

5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />

6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />

7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />

WE HAVE MIXED FEELINGS ABOUT THIS ASSEMBLY. SOME OF US<br />

FOUND IT EDUCATIONAL AND INTERESTING. SOME PEOPLE<br />

THOUGHT IT WENT OVER THE KIDS HEADS.<br />

8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />

PLEASE ASK FOR ADVICE ABOUT WHICH COMPOSER WOULD BE<br />

MOST APPROPRIATE FOR PRIMARY STUDENTS.<br />

9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />

SOME TEACHERS FELT THAT THESE COMPOSERS DIDN'T HAVE<br />

INTERESTING ENOUGH LIVES TO ENGAGE THE STUDENTS.<br />

3<br />

4<br />

4<br />

3<br />

4<br />

N/<br />

Arts in Education Service - School Evaluations <strong>2011</strong>-<strong>2012</strong><br />

Page 213 of 332


ARTIST: MEET THE MUSCIANS, L.L.C.<br />

CONTRACT #: A7513<br />

TITLE OF PROGRAM: DENNIS KOBRAY - BRAHMS<br />

TYPE OF PROGRAM: ASSEMBLY<br />

DISTRICT/ SCHOOL:<br />

# OF TEACHERS: 5<br />

CHAPPAQUA/GRAFFLIN ELEM.<br />

# OF STUDENTS: 104 GRADE(S) 3<br />

DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 11/18/11<br />

NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />

STANDARD 1 STANDARD 2 STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4 X<br />

ARTIST: MEET THE MUSCIANS, L.L.C.<br />

CONTRACT #: A7513<br />

TITLE OF PROGRAM: DENNIS KOBRAY - BRAHMS<br />

TYPE OF PROGRAM: ASSEMBLY<br />

DISTRICT/ SCHOOL:<br />

# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />

CHAPPAQUA/GRAFFLIN ELEM.<br />

# OF STUDENTS: 75 GRADE(S) K-4<br />

DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 11/18/11<br />

NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />

STANDARD 1 STANDARD 2 STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4 X<br />

1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />

1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />

1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />

2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />

3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />

4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />

5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />

6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />

4<br />

4<br />

4<br />

4<br />

5<br />

N/<br />

1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />

2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />

3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />

4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />

5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />

6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />

3<br />

5<br />

4<br />

3<br />

4<br />

N/<br />

7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y<br />

VERY ENGAGING AND INTERESTING FOR STUDENTS.<br />

WHY?<br />

7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM?<br />

INVENTIVE, ENTERTAINING AND INFORMATIVE.<br />

Y<br />

WHY?<br />

8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />

NONE<br />

9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />

NONE<br />

8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />

THIS PARTICULAR MUSICIAN WAS NOT QUITE AS ENGAGING AS<br />

SOME OTHER MUSICIANS WE'VE SEEN BASED ON STUDENT<br />

REACTION.<br />

9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />

WE STILL LOVE THIS PROGRAM.<br />

ARTIST: MEET THE MUSCIANS, L.L.C.<br />

CONTRACT #: A7513<br />

TITLE OF PROGRAM: DENNIS KOBRAY - BRAHMS<br />

TYPE OF PROGRAM: ASSEMBLY<br />

DISTRICT/ SCHOOL:<br />

# OF TEACHERS: 4<br />

CHAPPAQUA/GRAFFLIN ELEM.<br />

# OF STUDENTS: 100 GRADE(S) 2<br />

DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 11/18/11<br />

NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />

STANDARD 1 STANDARD 2 STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4 X<br />

ARTIST: MEET THE MUSCIANS, L.L.C.<br />

CONTRACT #: A8828<br />

TITLE OF PROGRAM: DENNIS KOBRAY - MOZART<br />

TYPE OF PROGRAM: ASSEMBLY<br />

DISTRICT/ SCHOOL: PUTNAM VALLEY/PUTNAM VALLEY ELEM.<br />

# OF TEACHERS: 5<br />

# OF STUDENTS: 400 GRADE(S) K-3<br />

DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 5/22/12<br />

NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />

STANDARD 1 STANDARD 2 STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4 X<br />

1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />

1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />

1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />

2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />

3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />

4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />

5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />

6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />

4<br />

5<br />

5<br />

4<br />

5<br />

5<br />

1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />

2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />

3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />

4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />

5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />

6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />

4<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

N/<br />

7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM?<br />

ORGANIZED, INFORMATIVE.<br />

8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />

NONE<br />

9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />

WE ALL ENJOYED IT.<br />

Y<br />

WHY?<br />

7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />

DENNIS IS NOT ONLY AN AMAZING MUSICIAN BUT A GREAT<br />

STORYTELLER.<br />

8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />

FOR THE LITTLE ONES - PROGRAM COULD BE A BIT SHORTER.<br />

9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />

NONE<br />

Arts in Education Service - School Evaluations <strong>2011</strong>-<strong>2012</strong><br />

Page 214 of 332


ARTIST: MEET THE MUSCIANS, L.L.C.<br />

CONTRACT #: A7882<br />

TITLE OF PROGRAM: DENNIS KOBRAY - STEPHEN FOSTER<br />

TYPE OF PROGRAM: ASSEMBLY<br />

DISTRICT/ SCHOOL:<br />

# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />

BRIARCLIFF/TODD ELEM.<br />

# OF STUDENTS: 350 GRADE(S) 3-5<br />

DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 1/9/12<br />

NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />

STANDARD 1 STANDARD 2 STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4 X<br />

1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />

ARTIST: MEGAN PATRONA<br />

CONTRACT #: A8025<br />

TITLE OF PROGRAM: CONTEMPORARY BOLLYWOOD DANCING FOR JAZZ<br />

CO<br />

TYPE OF PROGRAM: WORKSHOP<br />

DISTRICT/ SCHOOL: TUCKAHOE/TUCKAHOE HIGH SCHOOL<br />

# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />

# OF STUDENTS: 60 GRADE(S) 9-12<br />

DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 11/28/11-3/3/12<br />

NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />

STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 X STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4 X<br />

1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />

1.<br />

2.<br />

3.<br />

4.<br />

5.<br />

6.<br />

STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />

ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />

EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />

ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />

TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />

QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />

DENNIS' PRESENTATION IS SUPERB IN EVERY WAY. ENTERTAINING<br />

AND INFORMATIVE. POLISHED AND PROFESSIONAL.<br />

8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />

NONE<br />

9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />

SUPERB. EXCELLENT. ENGAGING.<br />

1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />

2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />

3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />

4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />

5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />

6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />

7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />

DANCE IS EDUCATIONAL, CULTURAL AND FUN.<br />

8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />

NONE<br />

9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />

NONE<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

N/<br />

ARTIST: MELISSA CASTIGNOLI<br />

CONTRACT #: A8720<br />

TITLE OF PROGRAM: MIXED MEDIA ABSTRACT ARTIST<br />

TYPE OF PROGRAM: WORKSHOP<br />

DISTRICT/ SCHOOL: NEW ROCHELLE/NEW ROCHELLE HS<br />

# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />

# OF STUDENTS: 110 GRADE(S) 9-12<br />

DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 3/30/12<br />

NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />

STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 X STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />

ARTIST: MELISSA HEALY BAKER<br />

CONTRACT #: A8508<br />

TITLE OF PROGRAM: FLUTE PLAYER FOR THE SHOW - AIDA<br />

TYPE OF PROGRAM: ASSEMBLY<br />

DISTRICT/ SCHOOL: OSSINING/OSSINING HIGH SCHOOL<br />

# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />

# OF STUDENTS: GRADE(S) 9-12<br />

DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 3/19-24/12<br />

NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />

STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />

1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />

1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />

1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />

2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />

3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />

4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />

5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />

6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />

7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />

MELISSA WAS VERY KNOWLEDGEABLE OF HER CRAFT AND WAS<br />

WONDERFUL WITH THE STUDENTS.<br />

8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />

IN TIME AND WITH MORE EXPERIENCE, I AM SURE SHE WILL BE A<br />

PRO AT PRESENTING AND DEMONSTRATING TO A CROWD.<br />

9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />

NONE<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

1.<br />

2.<br />

3.<br />

4.<br />

5.<br />

6.<br />

STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />

ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />

EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />

ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />

TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />

QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />

MELISSA WAS AN INCREDIBLE ASSET TO OUR PRODUCTION. HER<br />

MUSICIANSHIP IS EXCEPTIONAL.<br />

8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />

NONE<br />

9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />

WE ARE SO FORTUNATE TO HAVE HAD MELISSA PERFORM IN OUR<br />

PRODUCTION.<br />

Arts in Education Service - School Evaluations <strong>2011</strong>-<strong>2012</strong><br />

Page 215 of 332


ARTIST: MELISSA LIETO<br />

CONTRACT #: A7861A<br />

TITLE OF PROGRAM: HIP HOP & TAP I<br />

TYPE OF PROGRAM: WORKSHOP<br />

DISTRICT/ SCHOOL: EASTCHESTER/EASTCHESTER HIGH SCHOOL<br />

# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />

# OF STUDENTS: GRADE(S) 9-12<br />

DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 11/2/11-1/18/12<br />

NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />

STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 X STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4 X<br />

ARTIST: MELISSA LIETO<br />

CONTRACT #: A7861B<br />

TITLE OF PROGRAM: HIP HOP & TAP II<br />

TYPE OF PROGRAM: WORKSHOP<br />

DISTRICT/ SCHOOL: EASTCHESTER/EASTCHESTER HIGH SCHOOL<br />

# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />

# OF STUDENTS: GRADE(S) 9-12<br />

DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 11/3/11-1/19/12<br />

NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />

STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 X STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4 X<br />

1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />

1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />

1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />

2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />

3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />

4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />

5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />

6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />

2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />

3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />

4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />

5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />

6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM?<br />

NONE<br />

Y<br />

WHY?<br />

7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM?<br />

NONE<br />

Y<br />

WHY?<br />

8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />

NONE<br />

9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />

NONE<br />

8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />

NONE<br />

9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />

NONE<br />

ARTIST: MELISSA LIETO<br />

CONTRACT #: A7861C<br />

TITLE OF PROGRAM: HIP HOP & TAP III<br />

TYPE OF PROGRAM: WORKSHOP<br />

DISTRICT/ SCHOOL: EASTCHESTER/EASTCHESTER HIGH SCHOOL<br />

# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />

# OF STUDENTS: GRADE(S) 9-12<br />

DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 11/4/11-1/20/12<br />

NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />

STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 X STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4 X<br />

ARTIST: MELISSA MAGIET<br />

CONTRACT #: A8182<br />

TITLE OF PROGRAM: BOOKS COME ALIVE WITH ART<br />

TYPE OF PROGRAM: WORKSHOP<br />

DISTRICT/ SCHOOL:<br />

# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />

PELHAM/HUTCHINSON ELEM.<br />

# OF STUDENTS: 10 GRADE(S) 3<br />

DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 1/10-4/5/12<br />

NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />

STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 X STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />

1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />

1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />

1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />

2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />

3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />

4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />

5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />

6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />

2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />

3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />

4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />

5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />

6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />

5<br />

4<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM?<br />

NONE<br />

Y<br />

WHY?<br />

7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM?<br />

NONE<br />

Y<br />

WHY?<br />

8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />

NONE<br />

9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />

NONE<br />

8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />

NONE<br />

9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />

NONE<br />

Arts in Education Service - School Evaluations <strong>2011</strong>-<strong>2012</strong><br />

Page 216 of 332


ARTIST: MICHAEL BUONI<br />

CONTRACT #: A8455<br />

TITLE OF PROGRAM: DANCE<br />

TYPE OF PROGRAM: ASSEMBLY<br />

DISTRICT/ SCHOOL: NEW ROCHELLE/JEFFERSON ELEM.<br />

# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />

# OF STUDENTS: 500 GRADE(S) K-5<br />

DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 1/31-3/15/12<br />

NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />

STANDARD 1 STANDARD 2 STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />

ARTIST: MICHAEL CHERNEY<br />

CONTRACT #: A8712<br />

TITLE OF PROGRAM: CHINESE ART<br />

TYPE OF PROGRAM: ASSEMBLY<br />

DISTRICT/ SCHOOL: BYRAM HILLS/BYRAM HILLS HIGH SCHOOL<br />

# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />

# OF STUDENTS: 100 GRADE(S) 9-12<br />

DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 3/26/12<br />

NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />

STANDARD 1 STANDARD 2 STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4 X<br />

1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />

1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />

1.<br />

2.<br />

3.<br />

4.<br />

5.<br />

6.<br />

STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />

ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />

EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />

ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />

TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />

QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />

MICHAEL IS WONDERFUL. THE CHILDREN WILL STAY INSIDE ON A<br />

SUNNY DAY TO DANCE WITH HIM. WE WILL USE HIM AGAIN NEXT<br />

YEAR.<br />

8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />

NONE<br />

9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />

NONE<br />

1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />

2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />

3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />

4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />

5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />

6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />

7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />

EXCELLENT QUALITY OF WORK.<br />

8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />

MORE INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS.<br />

9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />

NONE<br />

4<br />

5<br />

5<br />

4<br />

4<br />

5<br />

ARTIST: MICHAEL COFFEY<br />

CONTRACT #: A7710<br />

TITLE OF PROGRAM: PERCUSSION PLAYER FOR THE SHOW - ANNIE GET<br />

YOUR GUN<br />

TYPE OF PROGRAM: ASSEMBLY<br />

DISTRICT/ SCHOOL: LAKELAND/WALTER PANAS HIGH SCHOOL<br />

# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />

# OF STUDENTS: 100 GRADE(S) 9-12<br />

DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 11/14-19/11<br />

NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />

STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />

1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />

ARTIST: MICHAEL GRAHAM - SPRING VALLEY PU CONTRACT #: A8630<br />

TITLE OF PROGRAM: JACK & THE BEAN STALK<br />

TYPE OF PROGRAM: ASSEMBLY<br />

DISTRICT/ SCHOOL:<br />

# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />

SOMERS/PRIMROSE ELEM.<br />

# OF STUDENTS: 220 GRADE(S) K<br />

DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 4/24/12<br />

NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />

STANDARD 1 STANDARD 2 STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />

1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />

1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />

2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />

3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />

4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />

5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />

6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />

7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />

NONE<br />

8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />

NONE<br />

9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />

NONE<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

1.<br />

2.<br />

3.<br />

4.<br />

5.<br />

6.<br />

STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />

ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />

EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />

ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />

TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />

QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />

THE STUDENTS WERE ENTRALLED BY THE PERFORMANCE. THEY<br />

LOVED SEEING THE BEHIND THE SCENES.<br />

8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />

NONE<br />

9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />

NONE<br />

Arts in Education Service - School Evaluations <strong>2011</strong>-<strong>2012</strong><br />

Page 217 of 332


ARTIST: MICHAEL GRAHAM - SPRING VALLEY PU CONTRACT #: A8077A<br />

TITLE OF PROGRAM: JACK & THE BEAN STALK<br />

TYPE OF PROGRAM: ASSEMBLY<br />

DISTRICT/ SCHOOL:<br />

# OF TEACHERS: 4<br />

LAKELAND/LINCOLN-TITUS ELEM.<br />

# OF STUDENTS: 84 GRADE(S) K<br />

DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 12/12/11<br />

NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />

STANDARD 1 STANDARD 2 STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />

ARTIST: MICHAEL GRAHAM - SPRING VALLEY PU CONTRACT #: A7698<br />

TITLE OF PROGRAM: JACK & THE BEAN STALK<br />

TYPE OF PROGRAM: ASSEMBLY<br />

DISTRICT/ SCHOOL: CHAPPAQUA/ROARING BROOK ELEM.<br />

# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />

# OF STUDENTS: 100 GRADE(S) K<br />

DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 3/2/12<br />

NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />

STANDARD 1 STANDARD 2 STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />

1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />

1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />

1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />

2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />

3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />

4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />

5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />

6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />

7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />

MICHAEL ALWAYS KEEPS THE STUDENTS ENGAGED THE ENTIRE<br />

TIME. THEY ARE TRULY AMAZED TO SEE HOW HE MAKES THE<br />

PUPPETS WORK AT THE END.<br />

8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />

NONE<br />

9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />

EACH YEAR I AM AMAZED AT SOME OF THE QUESTIONS FROM THE<br />

STUDENTS.<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />

2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />

3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />

4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />

5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />

6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />

7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />

MICHAEL GAVE A WONDERFUL RENDITION OF JACK AND THE<br />

BEANSTALK. HE KEPT THE STUDENTS ENGAGED.<br />

8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />

THE SHOW COULD BE SHORTENED A BIT.<br />

9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />

NONE<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

N/<br />

ARTIST: MICHAEL GRAHAM - SPRING VALLEY PU CONTRACT #: A7807<br />

TITLE OF PROGRAM: JACK & THE BEAN STALK<br />

TYPE OF PROGRAM: ASSEMBLY<br />

DISTRICT/ SCHOOL: CHAPPAQUA/WESTORCHARD ELEM.<br />

# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />

# OF STUDENTS: 90 GRADE(S) K<br />

DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 2/3/12<br />

NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />

STANDARD 1 STANDARD 2 STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />

ARTIST: MICHAEL GRAHAM - SPRING VALLEY PU CONTRACT #: A8077B<br />

TITLE OF PROGRAM: WOLF IN SHEEPS CLOTHING & 3 WISHES<br />

TYPE OF PROGRAM: ASSEMBLY<br />

DISTRICT/ SCHOOL:<br />

# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />

LAKELAND/LINCOLN-TITUS ELEM.<br />

# OF STUDENTS: 71 GRADE(S) 1<br />

DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 12/13/11<br />

NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />

STANDARD 1 STANDARD 2 STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />

1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />

1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />

1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />

2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />

3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />

4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />

5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />

6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />

2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />

3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />

4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />

5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />

6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM?<br />

GREAT SHOW.<br />

8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />

NONE<br />

9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />

NONE<br />

Y<br />

WHY?<br />

7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />

THE STUDENTS THOROUGHLY ENJOYED THE PERFORMANCE.<br />

THEY WERE FAMILIAR WITH HIS WORK FROM LAST YEAR.<br />

8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />

NONE<br />

9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />

WE WOULD LOVE TO HAVE HIM COME BACK NEXT YEAR.<br />

Arts in Education Service - School Evaluations <strong>2011</strong>-<strong>2012</strong><br />

Page 218 of 332


ARTIST: MICHAEL HARROLD<br />

CONTRACT #: A7904<br />

TITLE OF PROGRAM: EGYPT - A MULTI CULTURAL JOURNEY<br />

TYPE OF PROGRAM: ASSEMBLY/WORKSHOP<br />

DISTRICT/ SCHOOL: YORKTOWN/MILDRED STRANG MIDDLE SCHOOL<br />

# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />

# OF STUDENTS: 100 GRADE(S) 6<br />

DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 11/21/11<br />

NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />

STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 X STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4 X<br />

ARTIST: MICHAEL HARROLD<br />

CONTRACT #: A8385<br />

TITLE OF PROGRAM: EGYPT - A MULTI-CULTURAL JOURNEY<br />

TYPE OF PROGRAM: ASSEMBLY/WORKSHOP<br />

DISTRICT/ SCHOOL: NEW ROCHELLE/COLUMBUS ELEM.<br />

# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />

# OF STUDENTS: 400 GRADE(S) K-5<br />

DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 3/8/12<br />

NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />

STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 X STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4 X<br />

1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />

1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />

1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />

2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />

3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />

4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />

5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />

6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />

7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />

ENGAGING, ENTERTAINING, EDUCATIONAL, INTERESTING,<br />

SATISFYING EXPERIENCE.<br />

8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />

SHOW MORE ARTIFACTS, ASK FOR MORE VOLUNTEERS, LONGER<br />

TIME WITH ARTIFACTS.<br />

9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />

FELT IT WAS REALLY GOOD.<br />

ARTIST: MICHAEL HARROLD<br />

CONTRACT #: A8012<br />

TITLE OF PROGRAM: EGYPT - A MULTI-CULTURAL JOURNEY<br />

TYPE OF PROGRAM: ASSEMBLY/WORKSHOP<br />

DISTRICT/ SCHOOL:<br />

# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />

MTP/WESTLAKE MIDDLE SCHOOL<br />

# OF STUDENTS: 160 GRADE(S) 6<br />

DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 1/9/12<br />

NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />

STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 X STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4 X<br />

5<br />

5<br />

4<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />

2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />

3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />

4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />

5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />

6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />

7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />

HIS PRESENTATIONS ARE ALWAYS HIGHLY ENGAGING FOR THE<br />

CHILDREN. STUDENTS GO ON A VISUAL VIRTUAL TRIP TO<br />

ANOTHER COUNTRY AND COME BACK WITH A BETTER<br />

UNDERSTANDING OF ITS PEOPLE AND CULTURE.<br />

8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />

NONE<br />

9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />

OUR STUDENTS ALWAYS ENJOY HIS VISITS. THEY GET TO HANDLE<br />

THE ARTIFACTS THAT HE BRINGS AND INTERACT WITH HIM.<br />

ARTIST: MICHAEL HARROLD<br />

CONTRACT #: A7761<br />

TITLE OF PROGRAM: EGYPT - A MULTI-CULTURAL JOURNEY<br />

TYPE OF PROGRAM: ASSEMBLY/WORKSHOP<br />

DISTRICT/ SCHOOL:<br />

EASTCHESTER/EASTCHESTER MIDDLE SCHOOL<br />

# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />

# OF STUDENTS: 240 GRADE(S) 6<br />

DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 1/5/12<br />

NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />

STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 X STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4 X<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

N/<br />

1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />

1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />

1.<br />

2.<br />

3.<br />

4.<br />

5.<br />

6.<br />

STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />

ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />

EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />

ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />

TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />

QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />

MICHAEL HAS A UNIQUE WAY OF DELIVERING INFORMATION THAT<br />

ONLY EXPERIENCE CAN ATTAIN. HIS FIRST HAND KNOWLEDGE OF<br />

CULTURE IS PRICELESS.<br />

8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />

NONE<br />

9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />

MICHAEL DELIVERED AN EXCELLENT PRESENTATION. THE<br />

STUDENTS REALLY LEARNED A LOT AND ENJOYED HIS SHOW.<br />

1.<br />

2.<br />

3.<br />

4.<br />

5.<br />

6.<br />

STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />

ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />

EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />

ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />

TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />

QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />

THIS IS AN INTERACTIVE HANDS ON PRESENTATION. IT MAKES<br />

CONNECTIONS FROM PAST TO PRESENT. TEACHES ABOUT OTHER<br />

CULTURES AND TOLERANCE.<br />

8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />

NONE<br />

9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />

NONE<br />

Arts in Education Service - School Evaluations <strong>2011</strong>-<strong>2012</strong><br />

Page 219 of 332


ARTIST: MICHAEL HARROLD<br />

CONTRACT #: A7806A<br />

TITLE OF PROGRAM: EGYPT - A MULTI-CULTURAL JOURNEY<br />

TYPE OF PROGRAM: ASSEMBLY/WORKSHOP<br />

DISTRICT/ SCHOOL: CHAPPAQUA/BELL MIDDLE SCHOOL<br />

# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />

# OF STUDENTS: 180 GRADE(S) 6<br />

DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 12/2/11<br />

NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />

STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 X STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4 X<br />

ARTIST: MICHAEL HARROLD<br />

CONTRACT #: A7806B<br />

TITLE OF PROGRAM: EGYPT - A MULTI-CULTURAL JOURNEY<br />

TYPE OF PROGRAM: ASSEMBLY/WORKSHOP<br />

DISTRICT/ SCHOOL: CHAPPAQUA/SEVEN BRIDGES MIDDLE SCHOOL<br />

# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />

# OF STUDENTS: GRADE(S) 6<br />

DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 12/2/11<br />

NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />

STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 X STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4 X<br />

1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />

1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />

1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />

2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />

3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />

4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />

5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />

6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

N/<br />

N/<br />

1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />

2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />

3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />

4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />

5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />

6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />

MICHAEL HAS BEEN COMING TO BELL FOR SEVEN YEARS. WE<br />

VERY MUCH ENJOY HIS PERFORMANCE.<br />

8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />

NONE<br />

9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />

NONE<br />

7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />

MICHAEL IS A GREAT PRESENTER. HE DOES A SOLID JOB<br />

CONNECTING TO REAL STUDENT INTERESTS.<br />

8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />

NONE<br />

9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />

THANKS. SEE YOU NEXT Y EAR.<br />

ARTIST: MICHAEL HARROLD<br />

CONTRACT #: A7766<br />

TITLE OF PROGRAM: LATIN AMERICA & THE RAIN FOREST SHOW<br />

TYPE OF PROGRAM: ASSEMBLY/WORKSHOP<br />

DISTRICT/ SCHOOL:<br />

# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />

OSSINING/ROOSEVELT<br />

# OF STUDENTS: 340 GRADE(S) 5<br />

DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 10/14/11<br />

NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />

STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 X STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4 X<br />

ARTIST: MICHAEL HARROLD<br />

CONTRACT #: A7953<br />

TITLE OF PROGRAM: THE WORLD - A MULTI-CULTURAL JOURNEY<br />

TYPE OF PROGRAM: ASSEMBLY/WORKSHOP<br />

DISTRICT/ SCHOOL: CHAPPAQUA/WESTORCHARD ELEM.<br />

# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />

# OF STUDENTS: 96 GRADE(S) 3<br />

DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 12/5/11<br />

NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />

STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 X STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4 X<br />

1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />

1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />

1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />

2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />

3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />

4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />

5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />

6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />

4<br />

3<br />

3<br />

3.5<br />

3<br />

3<br />

1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />

2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />

3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />

4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />

5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />

6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

N/<br />

7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM?<br />

MAYBE FOR A SMALLER SETTING.<br />

Y<br />

WHY?<br />

7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM?<br />

NONE<br />

Y<br />

WHY?<br />

8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />

PURCHASE YOUR OWN MICROPHONE AND AMP SET. MORE<br />

INTERACTIVE ACTIVITIES.<br />

9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />

NONE<br />

8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />

NONE<br />

9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />

WE WOULD LOVE TO HAVE HIM BACK NEXT YEAR.<br />

Arts in Education Service - School Evaluations <strong>2011</strong>-<strong>2012</strong><br />

Page 220 of 332


ARTIST: MICHAEL LEE<br />

CONTRACT #: A8644<br />

TITLE OF PROGRAM: BASS PLAYER FOR THE SHOW - A FUNNY THING<br />

HAPPENED ON THE WAY TO THE FORUM<br />

TYPE OF PROGRAM: ASSEMBLY<br />

DISTRICT/ SCHOOL: PUTNAM VALLEY/PUTNAM VALLEY HIGH SCHOOL<br />

# OF TEACHERS: 3<br />

# OF STUDENTS: 400 GRADE(S) 9-12<br />

DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 4/13-23/12<br />

NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />

STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />

ARTIST: MICHAEL MCCARTHY<br />

CONTRACT #: A8562<br />

TITLE OF PROGRAM: FRENCY HORN PLAYER FOR THE SHOW - BEAUTY<br />

AND THE BEAST<br />

TYPE OF PROGRAM: ASSEMBLY<br />

DISTRICT/ SCHOOL: PLEASANTVILLE/PLEASANTVILLE HIGH SCHOOL<br />

# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />

# OF STUDENTS: 400 GRADE(S) 9-12<br />

DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 3/9-17/12<br />

NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />

STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />

1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />

1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />

1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />

2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />

3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />

4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />

5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />

6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />

2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />

3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />

4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />

5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />

6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

N/<br />

7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM?<br />

NONE<br />

Y<br />

WHY?<br />

7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM?<br />

HIGH, PROFESIONAL MUSIC QUALITY.<br />

Y<br />

WHY?<br />

8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />

NONE<br />

9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />

NONE<br />

8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />

NONE<br />

9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />

NONE<br />

ARTIST: MICHAEL MEADE<br />

CONTRACT #: A8511<br />

TITLE OF PROGRAM: CELLO PLAYER FOR THE SHOW - BEAUTY AND THE<br />

BEAST<br />

TYPE OF PROGRAM: ASSEMBLY<br />

DISTRICT/ SCHOOL: PLEASANTVILLE/PLEASANTVILLE HIGH SCHOOL<br />

# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />

# OF STUDENTS: 400 GRADE(S) 9-12<br />

DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 3/9-17/12<br />

NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />

STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />

ARTIST: MICHAEL SOPRANO<br />

CONTRACT #: A8652<br />

TITLE OF PROGRAM: TROMBONE PLAYER FOR THE SHOW - A FUNNY<br />

THING HAPPENED ON THE WAY TO THE FORUM<br />

TYPE OF PROGRAM: ASSEMBLY<br />

DISTRICT/ SCHOOL: PUTNAM VALLEY/PUTNAM VALLEY HIGH SCHOOL<br />

# OF TEACHERS: 3<br />

# OF STUDENTS: 400 GRADE(S) 9-12<br />

DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 4/13-23/12<br />

NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />

STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />

1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />

1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />

1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />

2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />

3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />

4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />

5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />

6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

N/<br />

5<br />

N/<br />

1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />

2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />

3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />

4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />

5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />

6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y<br />

HIGH QUALITY MUSICAL SUPPORT FOR PRODUCTION.<br />

WHY?<br />

7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM?<br />

NONE<br />

Y<br />

WHY?<br />

8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />

NONE<br />

9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />

NONE<br />

8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />

NONE<br />

9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />

NONE<br />

Arts in Education Service - School Evaluations <strong>2011</strong>-<strong>2012</strong><br />

Page 221 of 332


ARTIST: MICHAEL T. LALICKI<br />

CONTRACT #: A8817<br />

TITLE OF PROGRAM: FUNCTIONAL ART<br />

TYPE OF PROGRAM: WORKSHOP<br />

DISTRICT/ SCHOOL: LAKELAND/COPPER BEECH MIDDLE SCHOOL<br />

# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />

# OF STUDENTS: 75 GRADE(S) 8<br />

DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 5/18-30/12<br />

NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />

STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 X STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />

ARTIST: MICHAEL TEATOR<br />

CONTRACT #: A8376<br />

TITLE OF PROGRAM: CARTOONING<br />

TYPE OF PROGRAM: WORKSHOP<br />

DISTRICT/ SCHOOL:<br />

# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />

PELHAM/HUTCHINSON ELEM.<br />

# OF STUDENTS: 12 GRADE(S) 2-5<br />

DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 2/27-4/16/12<br />

NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />

STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 X STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />

1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />

1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />

1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />

2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />

3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />

4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />

5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />

6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />

2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />

3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />

4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />

5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />

6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />

HE HAS A GREAT RAPPORT WITH THE STUDENTS AND IS VERY<br />

PASSIONATE ABOUT HIS WORK.<br />

8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />

NONE<br />

9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />

WAS NICE TO BE ABLE TO SPEND A PERIOD TO CRITIQUE WORK<br />

AND TALK ABOUT THE EXPERIENCE THIS TIME.<br />

7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM?<br />

MICHAEL'S CLASS CONTINUES TO BE POPULAR.<br />

8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />

NONE<br />

9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />

NONE<br />

Y<br />

WHY?<br />

ARTIST: MICHAEL TEATOR<br />

CONTRACT #: A7614<br />

TITLE OF PROGRAM: CARTOONING<br />

TYPE OF PROGRAM: WORKSHOP<br />

DISTRICT/ SCHOOL:<br />

# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />

PELHAM/HUTCHINSON ELEM.<br />

# OF STUDENTS: 12 GRADE(S) 2-5<br />

DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 10/11-11/22/11<br />

NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />

STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 X STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />

ARTIST: MICHAEL TEATOR<br />

CONTRACT #: A7962B<br />

TITLE OF PROGRAM: CARTOONING<br />

TYPE OF PROGRAM: WORKSHOP<br />

DISTRICT/ SCHOOL:<br />

# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />

PELHAM/COLONIAL ELEM.<br />

# OF STUDENTS: GRADE(S) K-2<br />

DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 12/2/11-2/10/12<br />

NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />

STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 X STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />

1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />

1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />

1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />

2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />

3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />

4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />

5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />

6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />

7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />

MICHAEL'S CLASS CONTINUES TO BE A POPULAR CLASS YEAR<br />

AFTER YEAR.<br />

8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />

NONE<br />

9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />

NONE<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

1.<br />

2.<br />

3.<br />

4.<br />

5.<br />

6.<br />

STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />

ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />

EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />

ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />

TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />

QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

N/<br />

N/<br />

7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />

MIKE WAS PATIENT AND ENTHUSIASTIC IN TEACHING CHILDREN<br />

HOW TO DRAW THEIR FAVORITE CARTOONS. THE CHILDREN WERE<br />

ENGAGED AND HAD A WONDERFUL TIME.<br />

8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />

NONE<br />

9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />

NONE<br />

Arts in Education Service - School Evaluations <strong>2011</strong>-<strong>2012</strong><br />

Page 222 of 332


ARTIST: MICHAEL TEATOR<br />

CONTRACT #: A8053A<br />

TITLE OF PROGRAM: CARTOONING I<br />

TYPE OF PROGRAM: WORKSHOP<br />

DISTRICT/ SCHOOL:<br />

# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />

PELHAM/PROSPECT HILL ELEM.<br />

# OF STUDENTS: 21 GRADE(S) 3-5<br />

DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 1/10-3/6/12<br />

NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />

STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 X STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />

ARTIST: MICHAEL TEATOR<br />

CONTRACT #: A8053C<br />

TITLE OF PROGRAM: CARTOONING II<br />

TYPE OF PROGRAM: WORKSHOP<br />

DISTRICT/ SCHOOL:<br />

# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />

PELHAM/PROSPECT HILL ELEM.<br />

# OF STUDENTS: 17 GRADE(S) 1-3<br />

DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 1/12-3/8/12<br />

NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />

STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 X STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />

1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />

1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />

1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />

2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />

3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />

4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />

5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />

6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

N/<br />

1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />

2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />

3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />

4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />

5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />

6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

N/<br />

7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM?<br />

NONE<br />

Y<br />

WHY?<br />

7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM?<br />

NONE<br />

Y<br />

WHY?<br />

8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />

NONE<br />

9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />

NONE<br />

8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />

NONE<br />

9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />

NONE<br />

ARTIST: MICHAEL TEATOR<br />

CONTRACT #: A7962A<br />

TITLE OF PROGRAM: PAINTING<br />

TYPE OF PROGRAM: WORKSHOP<br />

DISTRICT/ SCHOOL:<br />

# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />

PELHAM/COLONIAL ELEM.<br />

# OF STUDENTS: 11 GRADE(S) K-2<br />

DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 11/28/11-2/13/12<br />

NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />

STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 X STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />

ARTIST: MICHAEL TEATOR<br />

CONTRACT #: A8053B<br />

TITLE OF PROGRAM: WATERCOLOR PAINTING<br />

TYPE OF PROGRAM: WORKSHOP<br />

DISTRICT/ SCHOOL:<br />

# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />

PELHAM/PROSPECT HILL ELEM.<br />

# OF STUDENTS: 13 GRADE(S) 3-5<br />

DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 1/11-3/7/12<br />

NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />

STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 X STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />

1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />

1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />

1.<br />

2.<br />

3.<br />

4.<br />

5.<br />

6.<br />

STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />

ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />

EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />

ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />

TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />

QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

N/<br />

N/<br />

7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />

MIKE KEPT THE CHILDREN ENGAGED, FOCUSED AND INTERESTED<br />

WHILE PAINTING NATURE'S WONDERS. THE CHILDREN ENJOYED<br />

THE CLASS AND LEARNED HOW TO HAVE FUN WITH COLORS.<br />

8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />

NONE<br />

9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />

NONE<br />

1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />

2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />

3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />

4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />

5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />

6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />

7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />

NONE<br />

8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />

NONE<br />

9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />

NONE<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

N/<br />

Arts in Education Service - School Evaluations <strong>2011</strong>-<strong>2012</strong><br />

Page 223 of 332


ARTIST: MICHELINGUA, LLC dba LINGUAKIDS CONTRACT #: A7789C<br />

TITLE OF PROGRAM: AUDREY TROCH - SPANISH CULTURE & LANGUAGE<br />

TYPE OF PROGRAM: WORKSHOP<br />

DISTRICT/ SCHOOL: KATONAH/LEWISBORO/MEADOWPOND ELEM.<br />

# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />

# OF STUDENTS: 10 GRADE(S) 2-4<br />

DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 10/12-12/14/11<br />

NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />

STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 X STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4 X<br />

ARTIST: MICHELINGUA, LLC dba LINGUAKIDS CONTRACT #: A7751A<br />

TITLE OF PROGRAM: AUDREY TROCH - SPANISH CULTURE & LANGUAGE<br />

TYPE OF PROGRAM: WORKSHOP<br />

DISTRICT/ SCHOOL:<br />

# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />

PELHAM/COLONIAL ELEM.<br />

# OF STUDENTS: 11 GRADE(S) K-5<br />

DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 11/7/11-3/12/12<br />

NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />

STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 X STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4 X<br />

1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />

1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />

1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />

2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />

3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />

4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />

5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />

6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />

5<br />

4<br />

4<br />

5<br />

4<br />

5<br />

1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />

2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />

3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />

4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />

5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />

6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

4<br />

4<br />

5<br />

7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM?<br />

THE CHILDREN WERE ENGAGED.<br />

Y<br />

WHY?<br />

7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM?<br />

OUTSTANDING PROGRAM.<br />

Y<br />

WHY?<br />

8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />

NONE<br />

9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />

THE STUDENTS RESPONDED WELL TO HER. SEVERAL PARENTS<br />

TOLD ME HOW MUCH THEIR CHILDREN ENJOYED HER CLASS.<br />

8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />

NONE<br />

9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />

NONE<br />

ARTIST: MICHELINGUA, LLC dba LINGUAKIDS CONTRACT #: A7695B<br />

TITLE OF PROGRAM: FLOR SMITH - SPANISH CULTURE & LANGUAGE<br />

TYPE OF PROGRAM: WORKSHOP<br />

DISTRICT/ SCHOOL:<br />

KATONAH/LEWISBORO/LEWISBORO ELEM.<br />

# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />

# OF STUDENTS: 11 GRADE(S) 1 & 5<br />

DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE<br />

10/3-12/16/11<br />

NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />

STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 X STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4 X<br />

1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />

1.<br />

2.<br />

3.<br />

4.<br />

5.<br />

6.<br />

STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />

ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />

EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />

ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />

TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />

QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />

4<br />

4<br />

4<br />

4<br />

4<br />

4<br />

7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />

VERY FLEXIBLE AND GREAT EXPOSURE TO FOREIGN CULTURE AND<br />

LANGUAGE.<br />

8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />

NONE<br />

9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />

NONE<br />

ARTIST: MICHELINGUA, LLC dba LINGUAKIDS CONTRACT #: A8402BC<br />

TITLE OF PROGRAM: LILLIAN VAN DORAN - SPANISH ART, CULTURE &<br />

LANGUAGE<br />

TYPE OF PROGRAM: WORKSHOP<br />

DISTRICT/ SCHOOL:<br />

# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />

PELHAM/HUTCHINSON ELEM.<br />

# OF STUDENTS: 19 GRADE(S) K-5<br />

DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 1/19-5/25/12<br />

NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />

STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 X STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4 X<br />

1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />

1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />

2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />

3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />

4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />

5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />

6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />

7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />

THE COURSE TAUGHT STUDENTS ABOUT A NEW CULTURE AND<br />

LANGUAGE, AND THEY HAVE FUN AT THE SAME TIME. CHILDREN<br />

PERFORM SONGS FROM DIFFERENT CULTURES AND THEY ARE<br />

EXPOSED TO THE VARYING FORMS OF ART AND MUSIC.<br />

8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />

CONSIDER OFFERING INTERMEDIATE AND ADVANCED COURSES<br />

FOR STUDENTS WHO DEMONSTRATE THAT THEY ARE READY FOR<br />

THE NEXT LEVEL.<br />

9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />

SEVERAL PARENTS HAVE EXPRSSED THAT THEIR CHILDREN<br />

ENJOYED THE CLASS.<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

Arts in Education Service - School Evaluations <strong>2011</strong>-<strong>2012</strong><br />

Page 224 of 332


ARTIST: MICHELINGUA, LLC dba LINGUAKIDS CONTRACT #: A8235D<br />

TITLE OF PROGRAM: LILLIAN VAN DORAN & AUDREY TROCH - SPANISH<br />

ART, CULTURE & LANGUAGE<br />

TYPE OF PROGRAM: WORKSHOP<br />

DISTRICT/ SCHOOL:<br />

# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />

PELHAM/PROSPECT HILL ELEM.<br />

# OF STUDENTS: 13 GRADE(S) 1 & 2<br />

DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 1/11-3/21/12<br />

NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />

STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 X STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4 X<br />

ARTIST: MICHELINGUA, LLC dba LINGUAKIDS CONTRACT #: A8401B<br />

TITLE OF PROGRAM: LUZ MARINA FORERO - SPANISH ART, CULTURE &<br />

LANGUAGE<br />

TYPE OF PROGRAM: WORKSHOP<br />

DISTRICT/ SCHOOL: KATONAH/LEWISBORO/LEWISBORO ELEM.<br />

# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />

# OF STUDENTS: 9 GRADE(S) 5<br />

DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 2/6-5/11/12<br />

NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />

STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 X STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4 X<br />

1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />

1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />

1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />

2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />

3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />

4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />

5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />

6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />

2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />

3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />

4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />

5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />

6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />

4<br />

4<br />

4<br />

4<br />

4<br />

4<br />

7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />

ENGAGING FIRST EXPOSURE TO THE FOREIGN CULTURE AND<br />

LANGUAGE THROUGH ART, MUSIC AND LANGUAGE.<br />

8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />

NONE<br />

9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />

NONE<br />

7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM?<br />

EDUCATIONAL AND GREAT TO WORK WITH.<br />

8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />

NONE<br />

9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />

NONE<br />

Y<br />

WHY?<br />

ARTIST: MICHELINGUA, LLC dba LINGUAKIDS CONTRACT #: A7789A<br />

TITLE OF PROGRAM: LUZ MARINA FORERO - SPANISH ART. CULTURE &<br />

LANGUAGE<br />

TYPE OF PROGRAM: WORKSHOP<br />

DISTRICT/ SCHOOL: KATONAH/LEWISBORO/MEADOWPOND ELEM.<br />

# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />

# OF STUDENTS: 9 GRADE(S) 1<br />

DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 10/12-12/14/11<br />

NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />

STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 X STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4 X<br />

ARTIST: MICHELINGUA, LLC dba LINGUAKIDS CONTRACT #: A8402F<br />

TITLE OF PROGRAM: MARIA CIARDIELLO - ITALIAN ART, CULTURE &<br />

LANGUAGE<br />

TYPE OF PROGRAM: WORKSHOP<br />

DISTRICT/ SCHOOL:<br />

# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />

PELHAM/HUTCHINSON ELEM.<br />

# OF STUDENTS: 13 GRADE(S) K-5<br />

DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 1/19-5/25/12<br />

NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />

STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 X STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4 X<br />

1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />

1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />

1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />

2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />

3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />

4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />

5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />

6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />

7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />

I FEEL IT IS IMPORTANT FOR CHILDREN TO HAVE ACCESS TO<br />

FOREIGN LANGUAGE AND CULTURE IN AN ENGAGING<br />

ATMOSPHERE.<br />

8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />

NONE<br />

9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />

NONE<br />

5<br />

4<br />

4<br />

5<br />

4<br />

5<br />

1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />

2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />

3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />

4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />

5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />

6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />

7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />

THE COURSE TAUGHT STUDENTS ABOUT A NEW CULTURE AND<br />

LANGUAGE, AND THEY HAVE FUN AT THE SAME TIME. CHILDREN<br />

PERFORM SONGS FROM DIFFERENT CULTURES AND THEY ARE<br />

EXPOSED TO THE VARYING FORMS OF ART AND MUSIC.<br />

8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />

CONSIDER OFFERING INTERMEDIATE AND ADVANCED COURSES<br />

FOR STUDENTS WHO DEMONSTRATE THAT THEY ARE READY FOR<br />

THE NEXT LEVEL.<br />

9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />

SEVERAL PARENTS HAVE EXPRSSED THAT THEIR CHILDREN<br />

ENJOYED THE CLASS.<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

Arts in Education Service - School Evaluations <strong>2011</strong>-<strong>2012</strong><br />

Page 225 of 332


ARTIST: MICHELINGUA, LLC dba LINGUAKIDS CONTRACT #: A8235C<br />

TITLE OF PROGRAM: MARIA CIARDIELLO - ITALIAN ART, CULTURE &<br />

LANGUAGE<br />

TYPE OF PROGRAM: WORKSHOP<br />

DISTRICT/ SCHOOL:<br />

# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />

PELHAM/PROSPECT HILL ELEM.<br />

# OF STUDENTS: 7 GRADE(S) 1 & 4<br />

DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 1/11-3/21/12<br />

NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />

STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 X STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4 X<br />

ARTIST: MICHELINGUA, LLC dba LINGUAKIDS CONTRACT #: A7753A<br />

TITLE OF PROGRAM: MARIA CIARDIELLO - ITALIAN ART, CULTURE &<br />

LANGUAGE<br />

TYPE OF PROGRAM: WORKSHOP<br />

DISTRICT/ SCHOOL:<br />

# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />

PELHAM/COLONIAL ELEM.<br />

# OF STUDENTS: 9 GRADE(S) K-5<br />

DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 11/7/11-3/12/12<br />

NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />

STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 X STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4 X<br />

1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />

1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />

1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />

2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />

3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />

4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />

5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />

6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />

2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />

3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />

4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />

5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />

6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

4<br />

4<br />

5<br />

7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />

ENGAGING FIRST EXPOSURE TO THE FOREIGN CULTURE AND<br />

LANGUAGE THROUGH ART, MUSIC AND LANGUAGE.<br />

8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />

NONE<br />

9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />

NONE<br />

7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM?<br />

OUTSTANDING PROGRAM.<br />

8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />

NONE<br />

9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />

NONE<br />

Y<br />

WHY?<br />

ARTIST: MICHELINGUA, LLC dba LINGUAKIDS CONTRACT #: A8402D<br />

TITLE OF PROGRAM: PATRICIA FIGUEROA - SPANISH ART, CULTURE &<br />

LANGUAGE<br />

TYPE OF PROGRAM: WORKSHOP<br />

DISTRICT/ SCHOOL:<br />

# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />

PELHAM/HUTCHINSON ELEM.<br />

# OF STUDENTS: 9 GRADE(S) K-5<br />

DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 1/19-5/25/12<br />

NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />

STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 X STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4 X<br />

ARTIST: MICHELINGUA, LLC dba LINGUAKIDS CONTRACT #: A8401C<br />

TITLE OF PROGRAM: PATRICIA FIGUEROA - SPANISH ART, CULTURE &<br />

LANGUAGE<br />

TYPE OF PROGRAM: WORKSHOP<br />

DISTRICT/ SCHOOL: KATONAH/LEWISBORO/LEWISBORO ELEM.<br />

# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />

# OF STUDENTS: 10 GRADE(S) 3 & 4<br />

DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 2/6-5/11/12<br />

NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />

STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 X STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4 X<br />

1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />

1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />

1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />

2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />

3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />

4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />

5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />

6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />

7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />

THE COURSE TAUGHT STUDENTS ABOUT A NEW CULTURE AND<br />

LANGUAGE, AND THEY HAVE FUN AT THE SAME TIME. CHILDREN<br />

PERFORM SONGS FROM DIFFERENT CULTURES AND THEY ARE<br />

EXPOSED TO THE VARYING FORMS OF ART AND MUSIC.<br />

8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />

CONSIDER OFFERING INTERMEDIATE AND ADVANCED COURSES<br />

FOR STUDENTS WHO DEMONSTRATE THAT THEY ARE READY FOR<br />

THE NEXT LEVEL.<br />

9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />

SEVERAL PARENTS HAVE EXPRSSED THAT THEIR CHILDREN<br />

ENJOYED THE CLASS.<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />

2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />

3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />

4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />

5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />

6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />

7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />

EDUCATIONAL AND GREAT TO WORK WITH.<br />

8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />

NONE<br />

9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />

NONE<br />

4<br />

4<br />

4<br />

4<br />

4<br />

4<br />

Arts in Education Service - School Evaluations <strong>2011</strong>-<strong>2012</strong><br />

Page 226 of 332


ARTIST: MICHELINGUA, LLC dba LINGUAKIDS CONTRACT #: A7695C<br />

TITLE OF PROGRAM: PATRICIA FIGUEROA - SPANISH ART, CULTURE &<br />

LANGUAGE<br />

TYPE OF PROGRAM: WORKSHOP<br />

DISTRICT/ SCHOOL: KATONAH/LEWISBORO/LEWISBORO ELEM.<br />

# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />

# OF STUDENTS: 9 GRADE(S) 2-4<br />

DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 10/3-12/16/11<br />

NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />

STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 X STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4 X<br />

1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />

ARTIST: MICHELINGUA, LLC dba LINGUAKIDS CONTRACT #: A7752A<br />

TITLE OF PROGRAM: SUE LIU - MANDARIN ART, CULTURE & LANGUAGE I<br />

TYPE OF PROGRAM: WORKSHOP<br />

DISTRICT/ SCHOOL:<br />

# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />

PELHAM/COLONIAL ELEM.<br />

# OF STUDENTS: 9 GRADE(S) K-5<br />

DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 11/7/11-3/12/12<br />

NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />

STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 X STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4 X<br />

1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />

1.<br />

2.<br />

3.<br />

4.<br />

5.<br />

6.<br />

STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />

ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />

EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />

ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />

TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />

QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />

4<br />

4<br />

4<br />

4<br />

4<br />

4<br />

7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />

VERY FLEXIBLE AND GREAT EXPOSURE TO FOREIGN CULTURE AND<br />

LANGUAGE.<br />

8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />

NONE<br />

9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />

NONE<br />

1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />

2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />

3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />

4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />

5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />

6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />

7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />

ALL THE PARENT FEEDBACK WAS EXCEEDINGLY POSITIVE.<br />

8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />

NONE<br />

9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />

NONE<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

4<br />

4<br />

ARTIST: MICHELINGUA, LLC dba LINGUAKIDS CONTRACT #: A7752B<br />

TITLE OF PROGRAM: SUE LIU - MANDARIN ART, CULTURE & LANGUAGE II<br />

TYPE OF PROGRAM: WORKSHOP<br />

DISTRICT/ SCHOOL:<br />

# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />

PELHAM/COLONIAL ELEM.<br />

# OF STUDENTS: 10 GRADE(S) K-5<br />

DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 11/18/11-3/6/12<br />

NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />

STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 X STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4 X<br />

ARTIST: MICHELINGUA, LLC dba LINGUAKIDS CONTRACT #: A8402A<br />

TITLE OF PROGRAM: SUE LIU - MANDARIN ART, CULTURE & LANGUAGE<br />

TYPE OF PROGRAM: WORKSHOP<br />

DISTRICT/ SCHOOL:<br />

# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />

PELHAM/HUTCHINSON ELEM.<br />

# OF STUDENTS: 9 GRADE(S) K-3<br />

DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 1/19-5/25/12<br />

NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />

STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 X STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4 X<br />

1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />

1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />

1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />

2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />

3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />

4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />

5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />

6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />

7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />

OUTSTANDING PROGRAM.<br />

8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />

NONE<br />

9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />

NONE<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

4<br />

4<br />

1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />

2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />

3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />

4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />

5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />

6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />

7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />

THE COURSE TAUGHT STUDENTS ABOUT A NEW CULTURE AND<br />

LANGUAGE, AND THEY HAVE FUN AT THE SAME TIME. CHILDREN<br />

PERFORM SONGS FROM DIFFERENT CULTURES AND THEY ARE<br />

EXPOSED TO THE VARYING FORMS OF ART AND MUSIC.<br />

8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />

CONSIDER OFFERING INTERMEDIATE AND ADVANCED COURSES<br />

FOR STUDENTS WHO DEMONSTRATE THAT THEY ARE READY FOR<br />

THE NEXT LEVEL.<br />

9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />

SEVERAL PARENTS HAVE EXPRSSED THAT THEIR CHILDREN<br />

ENJOYED THE CLASS.<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

Arts in Education Service - School Evaluations <strong>2011</strong>-<strong>2012</strong><br />

Page 227 of 332


ARTIST: MICHELINGUA, LLC dba LINGUAKIDS CONTRACT #: A8235B<br />

TITLE OF PROGRAM: SUE LUI - MANDARIN ART, CULTURE & LANGUAGE<br />

TYPE OF PROGRAM: WORKSHOP<br />

DISTRICT/ SCHOOL:<br />

# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />

PELHAM/PROSPECT HILL ELEM.<br />

# OF STUDENTS: 7 GRADE(S) 1-5<br />

DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 1/11-3/21/12<br />

NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />

STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 X STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4 X<br />

1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />

ARTIST: MICHELINGUA, LLC dba LINGUAKIDS CONTRACT #: A8402E<br />

TITLE OF PROGRAM: VALERIE LE COZ - FRENCH ART, CULTURE &<br />

LANGUAGE<br />

TYPE OF PROGRAM: WORKSHOP<br />

DISTRICT/ SCHOOL:<br />

# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />

PELHAM/HUTCHINSON ELEM.<br />

# OF STUDENTS: 9 GRADE(S) K-5<br />

DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 1/19-5/25/12<br />

NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />

STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 X STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4 X<br />

1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />

1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />

2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />

3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />

4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />

5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />

6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />

7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />

ENGAGING FIRST EXPOSURE TO THE FOREIGN CULTURE AND<br />

LANGUAGE THROUGH ART, MUSIC AND LANGUAGE.<br />

8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />

NONE<br />

9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />

NONE<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />

2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />

3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />

4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />

5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />

6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />

7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />

THE COURSE TAUGHT STUDENTS ABOUT A NEW CULTURE AND<br />

LANGUAGE, AND THEY HAVE FUN AT THE SAME TIME. CHILDREN<br />

PERFORM SONGS FROM DIFFERENT CULTURES AND THEY ARE<br />

EXPOSED TO THE VARYING FORMS OF ART AND MUSIC.<br />

8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />

CONSIDER OFFERING INTERMEDIATE AND ADVANCED COURSES<br />

FOR STUDENTS WHO DEMONSTRATE THAT THEY ARE READY FOR<br />

THE NEXT LEVEL.<br />

9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />

SEVERAL PARENTS HAVE EXPRSSED THAT THEIR CHILDREN<br />

ENJOYED THE CLASS.<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

ARTIST: MICHELINGUA, LLC dba LINGUAKIDS CONTRACT #: A8235A<br />

TITLE OF PROGRAM: VALERIE LECOZ - FRENCH ART, CULTURE &<br />

LANGUAGE<br />

TYPE OF PROGRAM: WORKSHOP<br />

DISTRICT/ SCHOOL:<br />

# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />

PELHAM/PROSPECT HILL ELEM.<br />

# OF STUDENTS: 9 GRADE(S) 1 & 2<br />

DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 1/11-3/21/12<br />

NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />

STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 X STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4 X<br />

ARTIST: MICHELINGUA, LLC dba LINGUAKIDS CONTRACT #: A7736A<br />

TITLE OF PROGRAM: VALERIE LECOZ - FRENCH ART, CULTURE &<br />

LANGUAGE I<br />

TYPE OF PROGRAM: WORKSHOP<br />

DISTRICT/ SCHOOL:<br />

# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />

PELHAM/COLONIAL ELEM.<br />

# OF STUDENTS: 9 GRADE(S) K-5<br />

DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 11/7/11-3/12/12<br />

NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />

STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 X STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4 X<br />

1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />

1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />

1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />

2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />

3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />

4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />

5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />

6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />

2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />

3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />

4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />

5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />

6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

4<br />

4<br />

4<br />

7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />

ENGAGING FIRST EXPOSURE TO THE FOREIGN CULTURE AND<br />

LANGUAGE THROUGH ART, MUSIC AND LANGUAGE.<br />

8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />

NONE<br />

9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />

NONE<br />

7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM?<br />

OUTSTANDING PROGRAM.<br />

8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />

NONE<br />

9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />

NONE<br />

Y<br />

WHY?<br />

Arts in Education Service - School Evaluations <strong>2011</strong>-<strong>2012</strong><br />

Page 228 of 332


ARTIST: MICHELINGUA, LLC dba LINGUAKIDS CONTRACT #: A7736B<br />

TITLE OF PROGRAM: VALERIE LECOZ - FRENCH ART, CULTURE &<br />

LANGUAGE II<br />

TYPE OF PROGRAM: WORKSHOP<br />

DISTRICT/ SCHOOL:<br />

# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />

PELHAM/COLONIAL ELEM.<br />

# OF STUDENTS: 9 GRADE(S) K-5<br />

DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 11/18/11-3/6/12<br />

NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />

STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 X STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4 X<br />

1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />

ARTIST: MICHELLE (SHELLEY) L. PERSALL CONTRACT #: A7596<br />

TITLE OF PROGRAM: AUTHOR VISIT<br />

TYPE OF PROGRAM: ASSEMBLY<br />

DISTRICT/ SCHOOL: YORKTOWN/MILDRED STRANG MIDDLE SCHOOL<br />

# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />

# OF STUDENTS: GRADE(S) 7<br />

DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 9/22/11<br />

NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />

STANDARD 1 STANDARD 2 STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />

1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />

1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />

2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />

3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />

4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />

5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />

6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />

7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />

OUTSTANDING PROGRAM.<br />

8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />

NONE<br />

9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />

NONE<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

4<br />

4<br />

5<br />

1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />

2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />

3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />

4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />

5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />

6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />

7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />

ABSOLUTELY.<br />

8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />

NONE<br />

9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />

FANTASTIC DAY.<br />

4<br />

N/<br />

N/<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

ARTIST: MIKE RISKO MUSIC SCHOOL, LLC CONTRACT #: A8039<br />

TITLE OF PROGRAM: JOHN BARNAS - GUITAR<br />

TYPE OF PROGRAM: WORKSHOP<br />

DISTRICT/ SCHOOL:<br />

# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />

CHAPPAQUA/GRAFFLIN ELEM.<br />

# OF STUDENTS: 9 GRADE(S) 3 & 4<br />

DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 1/13-3/9/12<br />

NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />

STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 X STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />

ARTIST: MIRIAM FERNANDEZ<br />

CONTRACT #: A7925A<br />

TITLE OF PROGRAM: SPANISH ART, CULTURE & LANGUAGE<br />

TYPE OF PROGRAM: WORKSHOP<br />

DISTRICT/ SCHOOL: CHAPPAQUA/WESTORCHARD ELEM.<br />

# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />

# OF STUDENTS: 8 GRADE(S) 3 & 4<br />

DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 1/11-2/29/12<br />

NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />

STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 X STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4 X<br />

1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />

1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />

1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />

2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />

3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />

4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />

5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />

6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />

4<br />

4<br />

4<br />

4<br />

3<br />

3<br />

1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />

2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />

3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />

4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />

5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />

6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM?<br />

NONE<br />

Y<br />

WHY?<br />

7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM?<br />

FANTASTIC CLASS.<br />

Y<br />

WHY?<br />

8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />

NONE<br />

9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />

EXCELLENT INSTRUCTOR. PREPARED. GREAT END OF YEAR<br />

SHOW. STUDENTS ENJOYED.<br />

8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />

NONE<br />

9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />

NONE<br />

Arts in Education Service - School Evaluations <strong>2011</strong>-<strong>2012</strong><br />

Page 229 of 332


ARTIST: MIRIAM FERNANDEZ<br />

CONTRACT #: A7925B<br />

TITLE OF PROGRAM: SPANISH ART, CULTURE & LANGUAGE<br />

TYPE OF PROGRAM: WORKSHOP<br />

DISTRICT/ SCHOOL: CHAPPAQUA/WESTORCHARD ELEM.<br />

# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />

# OF STUDENTS: 8 GRADE(S) 3 & 4<br />

DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 1/11-2/29/12<br />

NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />

STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 X STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4 X<br />

ARTIST: MONICA WELLINGTON<br />

CONTRACT #: A8210<br />

TITLE OF PROGRAM: AUTHOR VISIT<br />

TYPE OF PROGRAM: ASSEMBLY<br />

DISTRICT/ SCHOOL: CHAPPAQUA/ROARING BROOK ELEM.<br />

# OF TEACHERS: 9<br />

# OF STUDENTS: 200 GRADE(S) K & 1<br />

DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 3/30/12<br />

NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />

STANDARD 1 STANDARD 2 STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />

1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />

1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />

1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />

2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />

3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />

4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />

5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />

6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />

7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />

NONE<br />

8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />

NONE<br />

9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />

NONE<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />

2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />

3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />

4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />

5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />

6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />

7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />

K AND 1ST GRADE STUDENTS BOTH ENJOYED THE PROGRAM.<br />

8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />

NONE<br />

9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />

MONICA WAS VERY PERSONABLE WITH CHILDREN. SHE SHARED<br />

AN ACTUAL BOOK SHE WROTE IN FIRST GRADE WHICH MADE A BIG<br />

IMPRESSION ON OUR FIRST GRADERS.<br />

4<br />

4<br />

4<br />

4<br />

4<br />

N/<br />

ARTIST: NAI-NI CHEN DANCE COMPANY CONTRACT #: A7918<br />

TITLE OF PROGRAM: ART OF CHINESE DANCE<br />

TYPE OF PROGRAM: ASSEMBLY<br />

DISTRICT/ SCHOOL: PLEASANTVILLE/BEDFORD ROAD ELEM.<br />

# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />

# OF STUDENTS: 140 GRADE(S) 3<br />

DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 1/11/12<br />

NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />

STANDARD 1 STANDARD 2 STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4 X<br />

ARTIST: NANCY WU<br />

CONTRACT #: A7832<br />

TITLE OF PROGRAM: ORCHESTRA SEMINAR<br />

TYPE OF PROGRAM: WORKSHOP<br />

DISTRICT/ SCHOOL: BYRAM HILLS/BYRAM HILLS HIGH SCHOOL<br />

# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />

# OF STUDENTS: 41 GRADE(S) 9-12<br />

DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 3/15/12<br />

NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />

STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />

1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />

1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />

1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />

2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />

3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />

4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />

5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />

6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />

7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />

THIS PROGRAM ALLOWED OUR STUDENTS TO BECOME FULLY<br />

IMMERSED INTO THE CHINESE CULTURE AND MADE CONNECTIONS<br />

THAT THE CHILDREN COULD EASILY UNDERSTAND.<br />

8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />

WE WOULD HAVE LOVED TO HAVE SEEN AN AUTHENTIC CHINESE<br />

NEW YEAR DANCE SUCH AS THE LION OR DRAGON DANCE.<br />

9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />

THIS WAS AN OUTSTANDING PERFORMANCE. THANK YOU.<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

4<br />

1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />

2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />

3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />

4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />

5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />

6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />

7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />

NONE<br />

8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />

NONE<br />

9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />

ANOTHER GREAT VISIT.<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

Arts in Education Service - School Evaluations <strong>2011</strong>-<strong>2012</strong><br />

Page 230 of 332


ARTIST: NATALIE KINSEY-WARNOCK<br />

CONTRACT #: A7737<br />

TITLE OF PROGRAM: AUTHOR VISIT<br />

TYPE OF PROGRAM: ASSEMBLY/WORKSHOP<br />

DISTRICT/ SCHOOL:<br />

# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />

YORKTOWN/BROOKSIDE ELEM.<br />

# OF STUDENTS: 119 GRADE(S) 3<br />

DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 10/13/11<br />

NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />

STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />

ARTIST: NATALIE KINSEY-WARNOCK<br />

CONTRACT #: A8491<br />

TITLE OF PROGRAM: AUTHOR/ILLUSTRATOR VISIT<br />

TYPE OF PROGRAM: ASSEMBLY/WORKSHOP<br />

DISTRICT/ SCHOOL:<br />

# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />

NORTH SALEM/PQ ELEM.<br />

# OF STUDENTS: GRADE(S) 2<br />

DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 3/22/12<br />

NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />

STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />

1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />

1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />

1.<br />

2.<br />

3.<br />

4.<br />

5.<br />

6.<br />

STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />

ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />

EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />

ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />

TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />

QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />

MOST DEFINITLY. NATALIE IS PERFECT FOR 3RD GRADERS, AS HER<br />

WRITING FROM THE SENSES AND FINDING FAMILY STORIES<br />

DOVETAILS PERFECTLY WITH NARRATIVE WRITING THAT'S TAUGHT.<br />

8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />

NONE<br />

9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />

NONE<br />

1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />

2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />

3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />

4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />

5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />

6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />

7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />

NATALIE DOES AN AMAZING JOB AND INSPIRES STUDENTS TO<br />

LOOK FOR THEIR OWN FAMILY STORIES TO WRITE AND SHARE<br />

WITH OTHERS.<br />

8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />

NONE<br />

9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />

WE THOUGHT SHE WAS EXCELLENT.<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

ARTIST: NATALIE KINSEY-WARNOCK<br />

CONTRACT #: A8612<br />

TITLE OF PROGRAM: AUTHOR/ILLUSTRATOR VISIT<br />

TYPE OF PROGRAM: ASSEMBLY/WORKSHOP<br />

DISTRICT/ SCHOOL: KATONAH/LEWISBORO/KATONAH ELEM. SCHOOL<br />

# OF TEACHERS: 4<br />

# OF STUDENTS: 84 GRADE(S) 4<br />

DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 3/23/12<br />

NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />

STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />

ARTIST: NATHANIEL (NICCO) ANNAN<br />

CONTRACT #: A8151<br />

TITLE OF PROGRAM: CHOREOGRAPHER FOR THE SPRING MUSICAL<br />

TYPE OF PROGRAM: RESIDENCY<br />

DISTRICT/ SCHOOL: GREENBURGH #7/WOODLANDS MS/HS<br />

# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />

# OF STUDENTS: 47 GRADE(S) 7-12<br />

DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 12/13/11-3/31/12<br />

NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />

STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 X STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4 X<br />

1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />

1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />

1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />

2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />

3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />

4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />

5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />

6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />

7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />

PRESENTATION WAS VERY ENGAGING. GREAT STORYTELLER.<br />

8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />

NONE<br />

9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />

THIS WAS AN EXCELLENT PROGRAM. TEACHERS AND STUDENTS<br />

WERE FASCINATED BY THE STORIES. WOULD DEFINITELY REPEAT<br />

THIS PRESENTATION.<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

N/<br />

1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />

2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />

3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />

4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />

5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />

6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />

7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />

EXCELLENT CHOREOGRAPHER.<br />

8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />

NONE<br />

9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />

NONE<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

Arts in Education Service - School Evaluations <strong>2011</strong>-<strong>2012</strong><br />

Page 231 of 332


ARTIST: NATHANIEL (NICCO) ANNAN<br />

CONTRACT #: A7517<br />

TITLE OF PROGRAM: DANCE RESIDENCY<br />

TYPE OF PROGRAM: RESIDENCY<br />

DISTRICT/ SCHOOL:<br />

# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />

GREENBURGH #7/R.J. BAILEY ES<br />

# OF STUDENTS: 100+ GRADE(S) 4-6<br />

DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE OCT., <strong>2011</strong>-JUNE, <strong>2012</strong><br />

NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />

STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 X STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4 X<br />

ARTIST: NATHANIEL (NICCO) ANNAN<br />

CONTRACT #: A8780<br />

TITLE OF PROGRAM: DIRECTOR COORD. FOR THE TALENT SHOW<br />

TYPE OF PROGRAM: RESIDENCY<br />

DISTRICT/ SCHOOL: GREENBURGH #7/WOODLANDS HIGH SCHOOL<br />

# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />

# OF STUDENTS: 50 GRADE(S) 9-12<br />

DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 4/23-5/31/12<br />

NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />

STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 X STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4 X<br />

1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />

1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />

1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />

2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />

3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />

4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />

5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />

6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />

2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />

3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />

4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />

5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />

6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM?<br />

EXCELLENT.<br />

Y<br />

WHY?<br />

7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM?<br />

NONE<br />

Y<br />

WHY?<br />

8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />

NONE<br />

9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />

NONE<br />

8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />

NONE<br />

9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />

NONE<br />

ARTIST: NATHANIEL (NICCO) ANNAN<br />

CONTRACT #: A7516<br />

TITLE OF PROGRAM: DRAMA RESIDENCY<br />

TYPE OF PROGRAM: RESIDENCY<br />

DISTRICT/ SCHOOL: GREENBURGH #7/WOODLANDS HIGH SCHOOL<br />

# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />

# OF STUDENTS: 80 GRADE(S) 9-12<br />

DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE SEPT., <strong>2011</strong>-MA7, <strong>2012</strong><br />

NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />

STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 X STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4 X<br />

1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />

ARTIST: NATIONAL CIRCUS PROJECT<br />

CONTRACT #: A8395<br />

TITLE OF PROGRAM: AL CALIENES & ANDREW VINOKUROV - CIRCUS<br />

RESIDENCY<br />

TYPE OF PROGRAM: ASSEMBLY/WORKSHOP<br />

DISTRICT/ SCHOOL:<br />

# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />

CARMEL/KENT ELEM. SCHOOL<br />

# OF STUDENTS: GRADE(S) K-4<br />

DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 5/14-18/12<br />

NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />

STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 X STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4 X<br />

1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />

1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />

2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />

3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />

4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />

5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />

6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />

7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />

EXCELLENT TEACHER. TRULLY CARES ABOUT HIS STUDENTS.<br />

8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />

NONE<br />

9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />

NONE<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

N/<br />

1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />

2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />

3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />

4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />

5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />

6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />

7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />

FROM START TO FINISH - AN EXCELLENT ENGAGING PROGRAM.<br />

8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />

NONE<br />

9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />

NONE<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

Arts in Education Service - School Evaluations <strong>2011</strong>-<strong>2012</strong><br />

Page 232 of 332


ARTIST: NATIONAL CIRCUS PROJECT<br />

CONTRACT #: A7980<br />

TITLE OF PROGRAM: CIRCUS SHOW & WORKSHOPS<br />

TYPE OF PROGRAM: ASSEMBLY/WORKSHOP<br />

DISTRICT/ SCHOOL: HENDRICK HUDSON/BLUE MOUNTAIN MIDDLE SCHOO<br />

# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />

# OF STUDENTS: GRADE(S) 6-8<br />

DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 11/28-12/1/11<br />

NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />

STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 X STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4 X<br />

ARTIST: NATIONAL CIRCUS PROJECT<br />

CONTRACT #: A7678<br />

TITLE OF PROGRAM: CIRCUS SHOW & WORKSHOPS<br />

TYPE OF PROGRAM: ASSEMBLY/WORKSHOP<br />

DISTRICT/ SCHOOL:<br />

# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />

BRIARCLIFF/TODD ELEM.<br />

# OF STUDENTS: 640 GRADE(S) K-5<br />

DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 10/4-6/11<br />

NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />

STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 X STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4 X<br />

1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />

1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />

1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />

2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />

3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />

4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />

5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />

6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />

7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />

CIRCUS ARTS IS A GREAT PROGRAM THAT ENGAGES ALL<br />

DIFFERENTLY ABLED STUDENTS. THE PROGRAM ALLOWS ALL<br />

STUDENTS TO EXPERIENCE SUCCESS.<br />

8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />

NONE<br />

9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />

NONE<br />

4<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

4<br />

1.<br />

2.<br />

3.<br />

4.<br />

5.<br />

6.<br />

STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />

ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />

EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />

ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />

TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />

QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

4<br />

5<br />

N/<br />

7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />

THE STUDENTS LOVE THIS RESIDNECY. IT IS A PROGRAM THAT IS<br />

ENRICHING TO ALL.<br />

8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />

NONE<br />

9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />

NONE<br />

ARTIST: NATIONAL CIRCUS PROJECT<br />

CONTRACT #: A7936<br />

TITLE OF PROGRAM: CIRCUS SHOW & WORKSHOPS<br />

TYPE OF PROGRAM: ASSEMBLY/WORKSHOP<br />

DISTRICT/ SCHOOL: LAKELAND/GEORGE WASHINGTON ELEM.<br />

# OF TEACHERS: 2<br />

# OF STUDENTS: 500 GRADE(S) K-5<br />

DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 1/9/12<br />

NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />

STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 X STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4 X<br />

ARTIST: NEGO GATO ENTERPRISES<br />

CONTRACT #: A8845<br />

TITLE OF PROGRAM: AFRO BRAZILIAN MUSIC & DANCE<br />

TYPE OF PROGRAM: ASSEMBLY/WORKSHOP<br />

DISTRICT/ SCHOOL: PLEASANTVILLE/PLEASANTVILLE MIDDLE SCHOOL<br />

# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />

# OF STUDENTS: GRADE(S) 5<br />

DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 5/31/12<br />

NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />

STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4 X<br />

1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />

1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />

1.<br />

2.<br />

3.<br />

4.<br />

5.<br />

6.<br />

STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />

ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />

EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />

ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />

TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />

QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />

5<br />

5<br />

N/<br />

5<br />

5<br />

N/<br />

7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />

THE ARTISTS KEPT THE CHILDREN AWED, SURPRISED, CURIOUS<br />

AND FOCUSED. STUDENTS WERE COMFORTABLE VOLUNTEERING<br />

AND CONFIDENT THEY WERE WITH PROFESSIONALS. THE ARTISTS<br />

DEMONSTRATIONS AND LEARNING CUES ADDRESSED ALL<br />

LEARNING STYLES.<br />

8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />

NONE<br />

9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />

THEY WERE WONDERFUL.<br />

1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />

2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />

3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />

4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />

5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />

6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />

7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />

THE STUDENTS WERE ENJOYING THEMSELVES WHILE LEARNING<br />

ABOUT HISTORY.<br />

8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />

I FEEL THE KICKS AND CARTWHEELS SHOULD HAVE ONLY BEEN<br />

DEMONSTRATED.<br />

9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />

NONE<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

3<br />

N/<br />

Arts in Education Service - School Evaluations <strong>2011</strong>-<strong>2012</strong><br />

Page 233 of 332


ARTIST: NEGO GATO ENTERPRISES<br />

CONTRACT #: A8234<br />

TITLE OF PROGRAM: AFRO BRIAZILIAN MUSIC & DANCE<br />

TYPE OF PROGRAM: ASSEMBLY/WORKSHOP<br />

DISTRICT/ SCHOOL: KATONAH/LEWISBORO/MEADOWPOND ELEM.<br />

# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />

# OF STUDENTS: GRADE(S) K-5<br />

DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 5/29/12<br />

NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />

STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4 X<br />

ARTIST: NEIL FOSMAN<br />

CONTRACT #: A8736<br />

TITLE OF PROGRAM: KEYBOARD PLAYER FOR THE SHOW - XANADU<br />

TYPE OF PROGRAM: ASSEMBLY<br />

DISTRICT/ SCHOOL: CHAPPAQUA/HORACE GREELEY HIGH SCHOOL<br />

# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />

# OF STUDENTS: 200 GRADE(S) 12<br />

DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 4/16-21/12<br />

NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />

STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />

1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />

1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />

1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />

2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />

3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />

4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />

5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />

6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />

2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />

3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />

4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />

5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />

6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />

THE STUDENTS WERE ENGAGED AND REALLY GOT A SENSE OF<br />

CULTURE.<br />

8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />

NONE<br />

9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />

THANK YOU.<br />

7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />

IMPORTANT FOR THE STUDENTS TO SEE HOW ALL THE<br />

COMPONENTS OF A MUSICAL SHOW COME TOGETHER.<br />

8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />

NONE<br />

9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />

NONE<br />

ARTIST: NICOLE ARAVENA<br />

CONTRACT #: A8107<br />

TITLE OF PROGRAM: CHOREOGRAPHER FOR THE SHOW - BARNUM<br />

TYPE OF PROGRAM: RESIDENCY<br />

DISTRICT/ SCHOOL: NORTH SALEM/NORTH SALEM MS & HS<br />

# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />

# OF STUDENTS: 51 GRADE(S) 6-12<br />

DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 12/5/11-2/2/12<br />

NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />

STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 X STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />

ARTIST: NICOLE WHITAKER<br />

CONTRACT #: A8549<br />

TITLE OF PROGRAM: HIP HOP DANCING<br />

TYPE OF PROGRAM: WORKSHOP<br />

DISTRICT/ SCHOOL: KATONAH/LEWISBORO/MEADOWPOND ELEM.<br />

# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />

# OF STUDENTS: 9 GRADE(S) 2-4<br />

DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 3/5-5/7/12<br />

NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />

STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 X STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4 X<br />

1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />

1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />

1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />

2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />

3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />

4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />

5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />

6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />

2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />

3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />

4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />

5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />

6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

4<br />

N/<br />

7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y<br />

VERY ORGANIZED AND WONDERFUL WITH STUDENTS.<br />

WHY?<br />

7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM?<br />

STUDENTS LOVED NICOLE.<br />

Y<br />

WHY?<br />

8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />

NONE<br />

9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />

NONE<br />

8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />

NONE<br />

9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />

NONE<br />

Arts in Education Service - School Evaluations <strong>2011</strong>-<strong>2012</strong><br />

Page 234 of 332


ARTIST: NICOLE YOUNG<br />

CONTRACT #: A8026<br />

TITLE OF PROGRAM: HIP HOP & CONTEMPORARY DANCE FOR JAZZ CO<br />

TYPE OF PROGRAM: WORKSHOP<br />

DISTRICT/ SCHOOL: TUCKAHOE/TUCKAHOE HIGH SCHOOL<br />

# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />

# OF STUDENTS: 60 GRADE(S) 9-12<br />

DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 11/28/11-3/3/12<br />

NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />

STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 X STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4 X<br />

ARTIST: NICOLE YOUNG<br />

CONTRACT #: A7860<br />

TITLE OF PROGRAM: JAZZ & HIP HOP DANCING<br />

TYPE OF PROGRAM: WORKSHOP<br />

DISTRICT/ SCHOOL: EASTCHESTER/EASTCHESTER HIGH SCHOOL<br />

# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />

# OF STUDENTS: 20 GRADE(S) 9-12<br />

DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 11/2/11-1/18/12<br />

NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />

STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 X STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4 X<br />

1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />

1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />

1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />

2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />

3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />

4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />

5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />

6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />

2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />

3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />

4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />

5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />

6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />

DANCE IS FUN, EDUCATIONAL, CULTURAL AND ARTISTIC.<br />

7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM?<br />

NONE<br />

Y<br />

WHY?<br />

8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />

TIME MANAGEMENT.<br />

9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />

NONE<br />

8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />

NONE<br />

9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />

NICOLE BRINGS AN ENERGY TO THE COMPANY AND IS ALWAYS<br />

WONDERFUL TO WORK WITH.<br />

ARTIST: NINA TOCANTINA<br />

CONTRACT #: A7504A<br />

TITLE OF PROGRAM: BALLET DANCING<br />

TYPE OF PROGRAM: WORKSHOP<br />

DISTRICT/ SCHOOL: KATONAH/LEWISBORO/INCREASE MILLER ELEM.<br />

# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />

# OF STUDENTS: 9 GRADE(S) 1-3<br />

DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 10/3-11/28/11<br />

NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />

STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 X STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4 X<br />

ARTIST: NINA TOCANTINA<br />

CONTRACT #: A7504A<br />

TITLE OF PROGRAM: DANCE SQUAD<br />

TYPE OF PROGRAM: WORKSHOP<br />

DISTRICT/ SCHOOL: KATONAH/LEWISBORO/INCREASE MILLER ELEM.<br />

# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />

# OF STUDENTS: 11 GRADE(S) K-5<br />

DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 10/4-11/22/11<br />

NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />

STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 X STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />

1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />

1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />

1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />

2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />

3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />

4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />

5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />

6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

N/<br />

1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />

2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />

3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />

4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />

5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />

6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

N/<br />

7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y<br />

WE ARE SO LUCKY TO HAVE NINA TEACHING HERE.<br />

WHY?<br />

7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />

NINA IS FABULOUS. SHE IS A GREAT DANCER AND TEACHER.<br />

8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />

NONE<br />

9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />

NONE<br />

8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />

NONE<br />

9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />

NONE<br />

Arts in Education Service - School Evaluations <strong>2011</strong>-<strong>2012</strong><br />

Page 235 of 332


ARTIST: NYC CHINESE CULTURAL CENTER, INC. CONTRACT #: A8090<br />

TITLE OF PROGRAM: CHINA PATTERNS<br />

TYPE OF PROGRAM: ASSEMBLY<br />

DISTRICT/ SCHOOL: EASTCHESTER/ANNE HUTCHINSON ELEM.<br />

# OF TEACHERS: 2<br />

# OF STUDENTS: 475 GRADE(S) 2-5<br />

DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 12/9/11<br />

NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />

STANDARD 1 STANDARD 2 STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4 X<br />

ARTIST: NYC CHINESE CULTURAL CENTER, INC.<br />

CONTRACT #: A8171<br />

TITLE OF PROGRAM: CHINA PATTERNS<br />

TYPE OF PROGRAM: ASSEMBLY<br />

DISTRICT/ SCHOOL: HENDRICK HUDSON/FURNACE WOODS ELEM.<br />

# OF TEACHERS: 5<br />

# OF STUDENTS: GRADE(S) K-5<br />

DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 2/16/12<br />

NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />

STANDARD 1 STANDARD 2 STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4 X<br />

1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />

1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />

1.<br />

2.<br />

3.<br />

4.<br />

5.<br />

6.<br />

STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />

ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />

EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />

ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />

TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />

QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />

THE PERFORMERS WERE PROFESSIONAL, ENGAGING, AND DID AN<br />

OUTSTANDING PERFORMANCE.<br />

8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />

NONE<br />

9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />

THEY DID A GREAT JOB CONTROLLING THE AUDIENCE AND<br />

KEEPING THEM ENGAGED.<br />

ARTIST: NYC CHINESE CULTURAL CENTER, INC.<br />

TITLE OF PROGRAM: CHINA PATTERNS<br />

TYPE OF PROGRAM: ASSEMBLY<br />

DISTRICT/ SCHOOL:<br />

EASTCHESTER/GREENVALE ELEM.<br />

CONTRACT #: A7567<br />

# OF TEACHERS: 6<br />

# OF STUDENTS: 141 GRADE(S) 3<br />

DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE<br />

1/22/12<br />

NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />

STANDARD 1 STANDARD 2 STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4 X<br />

1.<br />

2.<br />

3.<br />

4.<br />

5.<br />

6.<br />

STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />

ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />

EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />

ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />

TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />

QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />

SUPER JOB. GREAT PERFORMANCE. THEY WERE EXCELLENT IN<br />

THEIR PERFORMANCE AND PROFESSIONAL IN THEIR<br />

PRESENTATION.<br />

8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />

NONE<br />

9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />

I LIKED HOW THEY INCLUDED LEARNING SOME CHINESE PHASES<br />

AND HAD CHILDREN PARTICIPATE IN A DANCE.<br />

ARTIST: NYC CHINESE CULTURAL CENTER, INC.<br />

TITLE OF PROGRAM: CHINESE RIBBON DANCE<br />

TYPE OF PROGRAM: WORKSHOP<br />

DISTRICT/ SCHOOL:<br />

CONTRACT #: A8131<br />

KATONAH/LEWISBORO/MEADOWPOND ELEM.<br />

# OF TEACHERS: 3<br />

# OF STUDENTS: 56 GRADE(S) 3<br />

DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE<br />

3/27/12<br />

NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />

STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 X STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4 X<br />

1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />

1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />

1.<br />

2.<br />

3.<br />

4.<br />

5.<br />

6.<br />

STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />

ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />

EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />

ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />

TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />

QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

N/<br />

7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />

EXCELLENT PROGRAM. PERFORMERS EXPLAINED DANCES,<br />

PROVINCES IN CHINA THE DANCES WERE FROM AND MEANING OF<br />

THE VARIOUS DANCES.<br />

8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />

NONE<br />

9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />

NONE<br />

1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />

2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />

3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />

4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />

5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />

6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />

7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />

STUDENTS REALLY ENJOYED IT.<br />

8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />

INSTRUCTOR SHOULD EXPLAIN MORE ABOUT THE DANCE AND<br />

TAKE QUESTIONS FROM THE STUDENTS.<br />

9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />

NONE<br />

5<br />

4<br />

2<br />

3<br />

4<br />

1<br />

Arts in Education Service - School Evaluations <strong>2011</strong>-<strong>2012</strong><br />

Page 236 of 332


ARTIST: NYC CHINESE CULTURAL CENTER, INC. CONTRACT #: A8662<br />

TITLE OF PROGRAM: CHINESE TRADITIONAL ARTS<br />

TYPE OF PROGRAM: WORKSHOP<br />

DISTRICT/ SCHOOL: DOBBS FERRY/SPRINGHURST ELEM.<br />

# OF TEACHERS: 5<br />

# OF STUDENTS: 105 GRADE(S) 3<br />

DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 3/15-28/12<br />

NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />

STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 X STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4 X<br />

1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />

ARTIST: OHENIO PRINCE<br />

CONTRACT #: A8623<br />

TITLE OF PROGRAM: EBONY HILLBILLIES - AMERICAN ROOTS MUSIC<br />

CONCERT<br />

TYPE OF PROGRAM: ASSEMBLY<br />

DISTRICT/ SCHOOL: NEW ROCHELLE/DANIEL WEBSTER ELEM.<br />

# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />

# OF STUDENTS: 550 GRADE(S) K-5<br />

DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 3/13/12<br />

NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />

STANDARD 1 STANDARD 2 STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4 X<br />

1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />

1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />

2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />

3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />

4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />

5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />

6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />

7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />

NONE<br />

8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />

NONE<br />

9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />

PING DID A GREAT JOB CONNECTING WITH THE SPECIAL<br />

EDUCATION STUDENTS.<br />

5<br />

5<br />

4<br />

4<br />

4<br />

5<br />

1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />

2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />

3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />

4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />

5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />

6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />

7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />

UPLIFTING AND JOYFUL CONCERT EXPERIENCE.<br />

8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />

NONE<br />

9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />

NONE<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

N/<br />

ARTIST: ONE WORLD ARTS, INC.<br />

CONTRACT #: A7689<br />

TITLE OF PROGRAM: RETUMBA - JOURNEY THRU THE CARRIBBEAN ALL<br />

WOMEN SHOW<br />

TYPE OF PROGRAM: ASSEMBLY<br />

DISTRICT/ SCHOOL:<br />

# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />

OSSINING/CLAREMONT ELEM.<br />

# OF STUDENTS: GRADE(S) 3 & 4<br />

DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 10/3/11<br />

NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />

STANDARD 1 STANDARD 2 STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4 X<br />

1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />

ARTIST: OVERFOOT, INC. - JODY OBERFELDER CONTRACT #: A7856B<br />

TITLE OF PROGRAM: MODERN DANCE<br />

TYPE OF PROGRAM: RESIDENCY<br />

DISTRICT/ SCHOOL: EASTCHESTER/EASTCHESTER HIGH SCHOOL<br />

# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />

# OF STUDENTS: GRADE(S) 9-12<br />

DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 11/3/11-1/19/12<br />

NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />

STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 X STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4 X<br />

1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />

1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />

2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />

3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />

4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />

5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />

6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />

7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />

STUDENTS, TEACHERS AND THE PRINCIPAL REALLY ENJOYED<br />

INTERACTING WITH THE GROUP.<br />

8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />

NONE<br />

9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />

WE USUALLY HAVE ASSEMPLY PERFORMERS EVERY OTHER YEAR,<br />

BUT RETUMBA WILL BE BACK.<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />

2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />

3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />

4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />

5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />

6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />

7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />

THE STUDENTS RECREATED A DANCE BY WATCHING A VIDEO.<br />

8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />

NONE<br />

9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />

JODY ALWAYS CREATES AN ATMOSPHERE OF CREATIVITY AND<br />

DISCOVERY.<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

N/<br />

N/<br />

Arts in Education Service - School Evaluations <strong>2011</strong>-<strong>2012</strong><br />

Page 237 of 332


ARTIST: OVERFOOT, INC. - JODY OBERFELDER CONTRACT #: A7856A<br />

TITLE OF PROGRAM: MODERN DANCE IMPROV<br />

TYPE OF PROGRAM: WORKSHOP<br />

DISTRICT/ SCHOOL: EASTCHESTER/EASTCHESTER HIGH SCHOOL<br />

# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />

# OF STUDENTS: 150 GRADE(S) 9-12<br />

DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 10/27/11<br />

NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />

STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 X STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4 X<br />

ARTIST: PAMELA HART<br />

CONTRACT #: A8225<br />

TITLE OF PROGRAM: THINKING THROUGH ART<br />

TYPE OF PROGRAM: WORKSHOP<br />

DISTRICT/ SCHOOL: KATONAH/LEWISBORO/INCREASE MILLER ELEM.<br />

# OF TEACHERS: 2<br />

# OF STUDENTS: 48 GRADE(S) 5<br />

DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 12/16/11, 2/3 & 10/12<br />

NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />

STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 X STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />

1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />

1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />

1.<br />

2.<br />

3.<br />

4.<br />

5.<br />

6.<br />

STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />

ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />

EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />

ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />

TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />

QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

N/<br />

N/<br />

7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />

JODY AND HER COMPANY SHARE THE JOY OF MOVEMENT WITH 150<br />

DANCES.<br />

8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />

NONE<br />

9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />

WE ARE THRILLED AS USUAL WITH HER CONTRIBUTION.<br />

1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />

2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />

3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />

4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />

5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />

6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />

7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />

NONE<br />

8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />

NONE<br />

9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />

NONE<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

ARTIST: PAMELA HART<br />

CONTRACT #: A8257<br />

TITLE OF PROGRAM: THINKING THROUGH ART<br />

TYPE OF PROGRAM: WORKSHOP<br />

DISTRICT/ SCHOOL: KATONAH/LEWISBORO/MEADOWPOND ELEM.<br />

# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />

# OF STUDENTS: 58 GRADE(S) 4<br />

DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 1/20/12<br />

NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />

STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 X STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />

ARTIST: PAMELA HART<br />

CONTRACT #: A8102<br />

TITLE OF PROGRAM: THINKING THROUGH ART<br />

TYPE OF PROGRAM: WORKSHOP<br />

DISTRICT/ SCHOOL: KATONAH/LEWISBORO/LEWISBORO ELEM.<br />

# OF TEACHERS: 3<br />

# OF STUDENTS: 62 GRADE(S) 4<br />

DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 12/1/11-2/2/12<br />

NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />

STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 X STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4 X<br />

1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />

1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />

1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />

2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />

3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />

4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />

5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />

6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />

7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />

NONE<br />

8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />

NONE<br />

9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />

NONE<br />

4<br />

4<br />

4<br />

4<br />

5<br />

4<br />

1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />

2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />

3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />

4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />

5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />

6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />

7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />

THE OPPORTUNITY TO WORK WITH A REAL POET AND MUSEUM IS<br />

A VALUABLE AND UNIQUE CONNECTION TO THE ART WORLD.<br />

8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />

INCORPORATE MORE OPPORTUNITIES FOR STUDENTS IN LARGE<br />

GROUP TO TURN AND TALK AS PART OF INTERACTIONS WITH<br />

ARTIST AND ARTWORK.<br />

9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />

PAM IS VERY KNOWLEDGEABLE AND FLEXIBLE.<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

Arts in Education Service - School Evaluations <strong>2011</strong>-<strong>2012</strong><br />

Page 238 of 332


ARTIST: PAMELA STEWART<br />

CONTRACT #: A8231<br />

TITLE OF PROGRAM: ACTING WORKSHOP<br />

TYPE OF PROGRAM: WORKSHOP<br />

DISTRICT/ SCHOOL: KATONAH/LEWISBORO/INCREASE MILLER ELEM.<br />

# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />

# OF STUDENTS: 9 GRADE(S) 3-5<br />

DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 1/23-3/19/12<br />

NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />

STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 X STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />

ARTIST: PAMELA STEWART<br />

CONTRACT #: A7546<br />

TITLE OF PROGRAM: ACTING WORKSHOP<br />

TYPE OF PROGRAM: WORKSHOP<br />

DISTRICT/ SCHOOL: KATONAH/LEWISBORO/KATONAH ELEM. SCHOOL<br />

# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />

# OF STUDENTS: 10 GRADE(S) 3-5<br />

DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 9/23-12/16/11<br />

NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />

STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />

1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />

1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />

1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />

2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />

3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />

4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />

5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />

6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />

2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />

3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />

4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />

5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />

6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />

4<br />

4<br />

4<br />

4<br />

4<br />

4<br />

7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />

WE ARE GETTING EXCELLENT REVIEWS OF THIS NEW CLASS.<br />

8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />

NONE<br />

9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />

NONE<br />

7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />

STUDENTS ENJOYED THIS CLASS. INSTRUCTOR WAS EASY TO<br />

WORK WITH.<br />

8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />

NONE<br />

9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />

NONE<br />

ARTIST: PAMELA STEWART<br />

CONTRACT #: A8288<br />

TITLE OF PROGRAM: ACTING WORKSHOP<br />

TYPE OF PROGRAM: WORKSHOP<br />

DISTRICT/ SCHOOL: KATONAH/LEWISBORO/KATONAH ELEM. SCHOOL<br />

# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />

# OF STUDENTS: 8 GRADE(S) 3-5<br />

DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 1/20-3/16/12<br />

NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />

STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 X STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />

ARTIST: PATRICIA ARENSON<br />

CONTRACT #: A8084<br />

TITLE OF PROGRAM: CHOREOGRAPHER FOR THE SPRING MUSICAL<br />

TYPE OF PROGRAM: RESIDENCY<br />

DISTRICT/ SCHOOL:<br />

# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />

ARDSLEY/ARDSLEY HIGH SCHOOL<br />

# OF STUDENTS: 500 GRADE(S) 9-12<br />

DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 12/16/11-3/17/12<br />

NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />

STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 X STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />

1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />

1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />

1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />

2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />

3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />

4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />

5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />

6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />

4<br />

4<br />

4<br />

4<br />

4<br />

4<br />

1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />

2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />

3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />

4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />

5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />

6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

4<br />

5<br />

7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />

VERY GOOD CLASS. WELL RUN AND WELL ORGANIZED.<br />

7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM?<br />

NONE<br />

Y<br />

WHY?<br />

8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />

NONE<br />

9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />

GOOD TEACHER.<br />

8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />

NONE<br />

9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />

NONE<br />

Arts in Education Service - School Evaluations <strong>2011</strong>-<strong>2012</strong><br />

Page 239 of 332


ARTIST: PATRICIA LAKIN KOENIGSBERG dba PAT CONTRACT #: A8133<br />

TITLE OF PROGRAM: AUTHOR VISIT<br />

TYPE OF PROGRAM: ASSEMBLY<br />

DISTRICT/ SCHOOL: CHAPPAQUA/WESTORCHARD ELEM.<br />

# OF TEACHERS: 5<br />

# OF STUDENTS: 103 GRADE(S) 1<br />

DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 2/29/12<br />

NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />

STANDARD 1 STANDARD 2 STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />

1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />

ARTIST: PATRICIA SANTOS<br />

CONTRACT #: A8646<br />

TITLE OF PROGRAM: CELLO PLAYER FOR THE SHOW - A FUNNY THING<br />

HAPPENED ON THE WAY TO THE FORUM<br />

TYPE OF PROGRAM: ASSEMBLY<br />

DISTRICT/ SCHOOL: PUTNAM VALLEY/PUTNAM VALLEY HIGH SCHOOL<br />

# OF TEACHERS: 3<br />

# OF STUDENTS: 400 GRADE(S) 9-12<br />

DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 4/13-23/12<br />

NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />

STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />

1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />

1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />

2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />

3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />

4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />

5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />

6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />

7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />

PATRICIA INTERACTS WELL WITH THE STUDENTS.<br />

8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />

NONE<br />

9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />

NONE<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5Y<br />

1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />

2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />

3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />

4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />

5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />

6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />

7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />

NONE<br />

8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />

NONE<br />

9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />

NONE<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

ARTIST: PATRICIA SCHORIES<br />

CONTRACT #: A8293<br />

TITLE OF PROGRAM: AUTHOR/ILLUSTRATOR VISIT - HOW A PICTURE<br />

BOOK IS MADE<br />

TYPE OF PROGRAM: ASSEMBLY<br />

DISTRICT/ SCHOOL:<br />

# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />

YORKTOWN/BROOKSIDE ELEM.<br />

# OF STUDENTS: 105 GRADE(S) K<br />

DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 1/25/12<br />

NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />

STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />

1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />

ARTIST: PATRICK GARNER<br />

CONTRACT #: A8189<br />

TITLE OF PROGRAM: THE WRIGHT BROTHERS & SISTER<br />

TYPE OF PROGRAM: ASSEMBLY<br />

DISTRICT/ SCHOOL: BREWSTER/GARDEN STREET ELEM.<br />

# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />

# OF STUDENTS: GRADE(S) K-3<br />

DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 12/14/11<br />

NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />

STANDARD 1 STANDARD 2 STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />

1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />

1.<br />

2.<br />

3.<br />

4.<br />

5.<br />

6.<br />

STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />

ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />

EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />

ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />

TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />

QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

N/<br />

7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />

PERFECT FOR K - LOOKING AT ILLUSTRATIONS ROLE IN STORIES.<br />

8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />

NONE<br />

9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />

NONE<br />

1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />

2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />

3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />

4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />

5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />

6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />

7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />

AS ALWAYS, PATRICK PUTS ON A GREAT PERFORMANCE.<br />

STUDENTS WERE ENGAGED AND EAGER TO HEAR THE STORY.<br />

8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />

NONE<br />

9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />

NONE<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

Arts in Education Service - School Evaluations <strong>2011</strong>-<strong>2012</strong><br />

Page 240 of 332


ARTIST: PAUL BERNARDI<br />

CONTRACT #: A8100<br />

TITLE OF PROGRAM: MUSICAL INSTRUMENT INSTRUCTION<br />

TYPE OF PROGRAM: RESIDENCY<br />

DISTRICT/ SCHOOL:<br />

# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />

TUCKAHOE/W. E. COTTLE ELEM.<br />

# OF STUDENTS: GRADE(S) 3-5<br />

DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE JAN.-JUNE, <strong>2012</strong><br />

NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />

STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 X STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />

ARTIST: PAUL HUGHES<br />

CONTRACT #: A7726<br />

TITLE OF PROGRAM: MAKING A VIDEO<br />

TYPE OF PROGRAM: WORKSHOP<br />

DISTRICT/ SCHOOL: KATONAH/LEWISBORO/LEWISBORO ELEM.<br />

# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />

# OF STUDENTS: 13 GRADE(S) 3-5<br />

DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 10/18-12/13/11<br />

NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />

STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 X STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />

1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />

1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />

1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />

2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />

3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />

4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />

5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />

6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />

2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />

3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />

4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />

5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />

6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />

4<br />

5<br />

4<br />

5<br />

5<br />

4<br />

7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM?<br />

NONE<br />

8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />

NONE<br />

9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />

NONE<br />

Y<br />

WHY?<br />

7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />

PAUL IS VERY INVOLVED WITH THE CHILDREN AND HAS A GOOD<br />

AMOUNT OF KNOWLEDGE ALL STUDENTS ENJOY HIS CLASSES.<br />

8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />

NONE<br />

9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />

NONE<br />

ARTIST: PAUL HUGHES<br />

CONTRACT #: A8760<br />

TITLE OF PROGRAM: PHOTOGRAPHY<br />

TYPE OF PROGRAM: WORKSHOP<br />

DISTRICT/ SCHOOL: KATONAH/LEWISBORO/LEWISBORO ELEM.<br />

# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />

# OF STUDENTS: GRADE(S) 4 & 5<br />

DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 4/25-5/30/12<br />

NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />

STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 X STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />

ARTIST: PEI LING LIU<br />

CONTRACT #: A8278<br />

TITLE OF PROGRAM: CHINESE ART & CULTURE<br />

TYPE OF PROGRAM: WORKSHOP<br />

DISTRICT/ SCHOOL: KATONAH/LEWISBORO/KATONAH ELEM. SCHOOL<br />

# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />

# OF STUDENTS: 9 GRADE(S) K & 1<br />

DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 1/19-3/15/12<br />

NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />

STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 X STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4 X<br />

1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />

1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />

1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />

2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />

3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />

4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />

5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />

6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />

7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />

AS ALWAYS, PAUL DID A WONDERFUL JOB. ALL THE CHILDREN<br />

WERE ENGAGED AND COULDN'T WAIT TO START THE CLASS.<br />

8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />

NONE<br />

9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />

NONE<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

1.<br />

2.<br />

3.<br />

4.<br />

5.<br />

6.<br />

STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />

ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />

EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />

ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />

TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />

QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />

EVERYONE LOVES PEILING. SHE IS A PLEASURE TO WORK WITH.<br />

8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />

NONE<br />

9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />

NONE<br />

Arts in Education Service - School Evaluations <strong>2011</strong>-<strong>2012</strong><br />

Page 241 of 332


ARTIST: PELHAM ART CENTER<br />

CONTRACT #: A8049C<br />

TITLE OF PROGRAM: SUSAN KAUFMAN - ARTS & CRAFTS / COLLAGE<br />

TYPE OF PROGRAM: RESIDENCY<br />

DISTRICT/ SCHOOL:<br />

# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />

PELHAM/PROSPECT HILL ELEM.<br />

# OF STUDENTS: 12 GRADE(S) K-2<br />

DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 1/12-3/8/12<br />

NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />

STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 X STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />

ARTIST: PELHAM ART CENTER<br />

CONTRACT #: A8049A<br />

TITLE OF PROGRAM: SUSAN KAUFMAN - ARTS & CRAFTS / PAPER CRAFTS<br />

TYPE OF PROGRAM: RESIDENCY<br />

DISTRICT/ SCHOOL:<br />

# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />

PELHAM/PROSPECT HILL ELEM.<br />

# OF STUDENTS: 9 GRADE(S) K-2<br />

DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 1/9-3/12/12<br />

NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />

STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 X STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />

1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />

1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />

1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />

2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />

3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />

4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />

5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />

6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

N/<br />

1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />

2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />

3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />

4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />

5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />

6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

N/<br />

7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM?<br />

NONE<br />

Y<br />

WHY?<br />

7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM?<br />

NONE<br />

Y<br />

WHY?<br />

8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />

NONE<br />

9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />

NONE<br />

8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />

NONE<br />

9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />

NONE<br />

ARTIST: PELHAM ART CENTER<br />

CONTRACT #: A8783<br />

TITLE OF PROGRAM: SUSAN KAUFMAN - FABRIC ART<br />

TYPE OF PROGRAM: WORKSHOP<br />

DISTRICT/ SCHOOL:<br />

# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />

PELHAM/HUTCHINSON ELEM.<br />

# OF STUDENTS: 65 GRADE(S) K<br />

DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 4/26-5/31/12<br />

NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />

STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 X STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />

ARTIST: PERIWINKLE NATIONAL THEATRE CONTRACT #: A7826<br />

TITLE OF PROGRAM: HALFWAY THERE<br />

TYPE OF PROGRAM: ASSEMBLY<br />

DISTRICT/ SCHOOL: KATONAH/LEWISBORO/JOHN JAY MIDDLE SCHOOL<br />

# OF TEACHERS: 5<br />

# OF STUDENTS: 110 GRADE(S) 6-8<br />

DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 11/8/11<br />

NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />

STANDARD 1 STANDARD 2 STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />

1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />

1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />

1.<br />

2.<br />

3.<br />

4.<br />

5.<br />

6.<br />

STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />

ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />

EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />

ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />

TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />

QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />

THE FABRIC ART PROJECTS WERE GREAT. THE STUDENTS LOVED<br />

THE DYING.<br />

8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />

NONE<br />

9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />

WE LOOK FORWARD TO CONTINUING THESE WORKSHOPS.<br />

1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />

2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />

3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />

4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />

5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />

6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />

7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />

OUR STUDENTS RESPONDED IN A POWERFUL, POSITIVE,<br />

CONSTRUCTIVE, MEANINGFUL WAY TO THIS PROGRAM. IT WAS<br />

MOVING AND THE STUDENTS CONTINUE TO EXPRESS THEIR<br />

REACTION IN WAYS THAT INDICATE THEY TRULY BENEFITED.<br />

8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />

NONE<br />

9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />

OUTSTANDING PROGRAM. IT WAS A PLEASURE TO WORK WITH<br />

THEM. ACTORS WERE EXCELLENT PERFORMERS AND CONNECTED<br />

WELL WITH OUR STUDENTS.<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

Arts in Education Service - School Evaluations <strong>2011</strong>-<strong>2012</strong><br />

Page 242 of 332


ARTIST: PETER CATALANOTTO<br />

CONTRACT #: A7855<br />

TITLE OF PROGRAM: AUTHOR VISIT<br />

TYPE OF PROGRAM: ASSEMBLY<br />

DISTRICT/ SCHOOL: NEW ROCHELLE/WARD ELEM. SCHOOL<br />

# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />

# OF STUDENTS: 110 GRADE(S) K-5<br />

DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 12/13/11<br />

NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />

STANDARD 1 STANDARD 2 STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />

ARTIST: PETER KANE<br />

CONTRACT #: A7683<br />

TITLE OF PROGRAM: SET DESIGNER FOR THE FALL SHOW<br />

TYPE OF PROGRAM: RESIDENCY<br />

DISTRICT/ SCHOOL: KATONAH/LEWISBORO/JOHN JAY HIGH SCHOOL<br />

# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />

# OF STUDENTS: 400 GRADE(S) 9-12<br />

DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 10/24-11/24/11<br />

NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />

STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 X STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />

1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />

1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />

1.<br />

2.<br />

3.<br />

4.<br />

5.<br />

6.<br />

STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />

ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />

EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />

ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />

TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />

QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />

TEACHER AND STUDENT ENJOYED PETER'S PRESENTATIONS. HE<br />

DEMONSTRATED MANY WAYS TO START, CONTINUE AND FINISH A<br />

STORY.<br />

8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />

NONE<br />

9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />

HE WAS GREAT WITH A LARGE AUDIENCE.<br />

1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />

2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />

3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />

4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />

5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />

6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />

7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />

NONE<br />

8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />

NONE<br />

9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />

NONE<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

ARTIST: PETER LERANGIS<br />

CONTRACT #: A8132<br />

TITLE OF PROGRAM: AUTHOR VISIT<br />

TYPE OF PROGRAM: WORKSHOP<br />

DISTRICT/ SCHOOL: CHAPPAQUA/WESTORCHARD ELEM.<br />

# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />

# OF STUDENTS: 123 GRADE(S) 4<br />

DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 1/11/12<br />

NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />

STANDARD 1 STANDARD 2 STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />

ARTIST: PETER LINZ<br />

CONTRACT #: A7987<br />

TITLE OF PROGRAM: PUPPET SHOW - CHARACTER ED<br />

TYPE OF PROGRAM: ASSEMBLY/WORKSH0P<br />

DISTRICT/ SCHOOL: KATONAH/LEWISBORO/KATONAH ELEM. SCHOOL<br />

# OF TEACHERS: 6<br />

# OF STUDENTS: 140 GRADE(S) K-5<br />

DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 6/1/12<br />

NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />

STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 X STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />

1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />

1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />

1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />

2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />

3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />

4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />

5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />

6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />

2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />

3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />

4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />

5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />

6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM?<br />

HE IS WONDERFUL.<br />

Y<br />

WHY?<br />

7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM?<br />

WONDERFUL, FUN.<br />

Y<br />

WHY?<br />

8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />

NONE<br />

9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />

NONE<br />

8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />

NONE<br />

9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />

THANK YOU.<br />

Arts in Education Service - School Evaluations <strong>2011</strong>-<strong>2012</strong><br />

Page 243 of 332


ARTIST: PETER LINZ<br />

CONTRACT #: A8247<br />

TITLE OF PROGRAM: SET LIGHTING SPECIAL EFFECTS FOR THE SHOW -<br />

THE DROWSY CHAPERONE<br />

TYPE OF PROGRAM: RESIDENCY<br />

DISTRICT/ SCHOOL: KATONAH/LEWISBORO/JOHN JAY MIDDLE SCHOOL<br />

# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />

# OF STUDENTS: 73 GRADE(S) 6-8<br />

DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 1/15-3/15/12<br />

NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />

STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 X STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />

ARTIST: PETER LINZ<br />

CONTRACT #: A7679<br />

TITLE OF PROGRAM: SET LIGHTING SPECIAL EFFECTS FOR THE SHOW -<br />

THE TWILIGHT ZONE<br />

TYPE OF PROGRAM: RESIDENCY<br />

DISTRICT/ SCHOOL: KATONAH/LEWISBORO/JOHN JAY MIDDLE SCHOOL<br />

# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />

# OF STUDENTS: 43 GRADE(S) 6-8<br />

DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 10/10-11/8/11<br />

NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />

STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 X STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />

1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />

1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />

1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />

2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />

3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />

4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />

5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />

6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />

7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />

PETER WAS A DELIGHT TO WORK WITH. WE LOOK FORWARD TO<br />

WORKING WITH HIM AGAIN NEXT YEAR.<br />

8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />

NONE<br />

9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />

A FABULOUR FLYING APPARATUS.<br />

ARTIST: PETER LOURIE<br />

TITLE OF PROGRAM: AUTHOR VISIT<br />

TYPE OF PROGRAM: ASSEMBLY<br />

DISTRICT/ SCHOOL:<br />

CONTRACT #: A8389<br />

KATONAH/LEWISBORO/LEWISBORO ELEM.<br />

# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />

# OF STUDENTS: GRADE(S) 3-5<br />

DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE<br />

3/27/12<br />

NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />

STANDARD 1 STANDARD 2 STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

1.<br />

2.<br />

3.<br />

4.<br />

5.<br />

6.<br />

STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />

ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />

EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />

ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />

TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />

QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

N/<br />

N/<br />

7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />

PETER IS AN ABSOLUTE DELIGHT TO WORK WITH. HIS CREATIVITY<br />

AND IMAGINATION ARE UNSURPASSED. THE STUDENTS WERE<br />

THRILLED WITH THE PLANE AND THE GREMLIN. PETER HAS SUCH<br />

A WONDERFUL RAPPORT WITH STUDENTS.<br />

8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />

NONE<br />

9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />

ARTIST:<br />

WE WOULD LOVE TO WORK WITH PETER AGAIN.<br />

PETER LOURIE<br />

TITLE OF PROGRAM: AUTHOR VISIT<br />

TYPE OF PROGRAM: ASSEMBLY/WORKSHOP<br />

DISTRICT/ SCHOOL:<br />

HALDANE/HALDANE ELEM. SCHOOL<br />

CONTRACT #: A7773<br />

# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />

# OF STUDENTS: 57 GRADE(S) 4<br />

DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 10/28/11<br />

NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />

STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 X STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />

1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />

1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />

1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />

2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />

3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />

4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />

5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />

6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />

7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />

NONE<br />

8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />

NONE<br />

9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />

NONE<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />

2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />

3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />

4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />

5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />

6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />

7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />

NONE<br />

8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />

NONE<br />

9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />

WE WERE SEEING MATERIAL FROM NEW ADVENTURES. CONTINUE<br />

TO ADD AND UPDATE PHOTOS. THANKS.<br />

4<br />

4<br />

4<br />

4<br />

4<br />

4<br />

Arts in Education Service - School Evaluations <strong>2011</strong>-<strong>2012</strong><br />

Page 244 of 332


ARTIST: PETER LOURIE<br />

CONTRACT #: A7873<br />

TITLE OF PROGRAM: AUTHOR VISIT<br />

TYPE OF PROGRAM: WORKSHOP<br />

DISTRICT/ SCHOOL:<br />

# OF TEACHERS: 8<br />

BYRAM HILLS/WAMPUS ELEM.<br />

# OF STUDENTS: 600 GRADE(S) 3-5<br />

DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 12/8/11<br />

NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />

STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 X STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />

ARTIST: PETER LOURIE<br />

CONTRACT #: A8755<br />

TITLE OF PROGRAM: AUTHOR VISIT<br />

TYPE OF PROGRAM: ASSEMBLY<br />

DISTRICT/ SCHOOL: SOMERS/SOMERS INTERMEDIATE SCHOOL<br />

# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />

# OF STUDENTS: 830 GRADE(S) 3-5<br />

DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 4/16/12<br />

NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />

STANDARD 1 STANDARD 2 STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />

1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />

1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />

1.<br />

2.<br />

3.<br />

4.<br />

5.<br />

6.<br />

STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />

ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />

EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />

ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />

TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />

QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />

PETER BRILLIANTLY WEAVES TOGETHER HIS ADVENTURES AND<br />

MANY TRIPS IN A WAY THAT STUDENTS CAN RELATE. HE INSPIRES<br />

STUDENTS TO DO RESEARCH, USE RICH DETAILS AND WRITE<br />

ABOUT THEIR OWN EXPERIENCES.<br />

8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />

NONE<br />

9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />

HE HAS IT ALL. HE IS PERSONABLE, PREPARED, PROFESSIONAL<br />

AND HAS GREAT TIMING.<br />

1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />

2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />

3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />

4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />

5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />

6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />

7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />

THE STUDENTS LOVED PETER'S ENERGY AND PASSION FOR HIS<br />

WORK.<br />

8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />

NONE<br />

9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />

NONE<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

ARTIST: PETER LOURIE<br />

CONTRACT #: A7757<br />

TITLE OF PROGRAM: AUTHOR VISIT<br />

TYPE OF PROGRAM: ASSEMBLY/WORKSHOP<br />

DISTRICT/ SCHOOL: KATONAH/LEWISBORO/INCREASE MILLER ELEM.<br />

# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />

# OF STUDENTS: 59 GRADE(S) 4<br />

DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 10/5/11<br />

NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />

STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 X STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />

ARTIST: PETER LOURIE<br />

CONTRACT #: A7604<br />

TITLE OF PROGRAM: AUTHOR VISIT<br />

TYPE OF PROGRAM: ASSEMBLY<br />

DISTRICT/ SCHOOL: HENDRICK HUDSON/FURNACE WOODS ELEM.<br />

# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />

# OF STUDENTS: 73 GRADE(S) 4 & 5<br />

DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 10/26/11<br />

NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />

STANDARD 1 STANDARD 2 STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />

1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />

1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />

1.<br />

2.<br />

3.<br />

4.<br />

5.<br />

6.<br />

STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />

ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />

EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />

ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />

TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />

QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />

PETER ENGAGES THE STUDENTS VERY WELL. HE KEEPS THEM<br />

INTERESTED WITH HIS ENTHUSIASM AND HAS SUCH A WEALTH OF<br />

EXPERIENCES TO DRAW FROM. CLEARLY, PETER LOVES HIS JOB<br />

AS A WRITER AND CONVEYS THIS TO HIS AUDIENCE.<br />

8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />

NONE<br />

9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />

NONE<br />

1.<br />

2.<br />

3.<br />

4.<br />

5.<br />

6.<br />

STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />

ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />

EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />

ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />

TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />

QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />

PETER GIVES A GREAT ACCOUNT OF HIS JOURNEY TO BECOMING<br />

AN AUTHOR.<br />

8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />

NONE<br />

9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />

NONE<br />

Arts in Education Service - School Evaluations <strong>2011</strong>-<strong>2012</strong><br />

Page 245 of 332


ARTIST: PETER LOURIE<br />

CONTRACT #: A8011<br />

TITLE OF PROGRAM: AUTHOR VISIT<br />

TYPE OF PROGRAM: WORKSHOP<br />

DISTRICT/ SCHOOL:<br />

# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />

BRIARCLIFF/TODD ELEM.<br />

# OF STUDENTS: 120 GRADE(S) 4<br />

DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 12/5/11<br />

NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />

STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 X STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />

ARTIST: PETER OSPINA<br />

CONTRACT #: A8709<br />

TITLE OF PROGRAM: CREATING A SCHOOL MURAL<br />

TYPE OF PROGRAM: RESIDENCY<br />

DISTRICT/ SCHOOL:<br />

# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />

OSSINING/ROOSEVELT<br />

# OF STUDENTS: 150 GRADE(S) 5<br />

DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 5/14-18/12<br />

NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />

STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 X STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4 X<br />

1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />

1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />

1.<br />

2.<br />

3.<br />

4.<br />

5.<br />

6.<br />

STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />

ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />

EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />

ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />

TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />

QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />

PETE IS ENGAGING, INFORMATIVE, CURRICULUM ORIENTED AND<br />

LOW MAINTENANCE. WHAT A WONDERFUL PRESENTER. HEARTILY<br />

ENDORSED.<br />

8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />

NONE<br />

9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />

BRAVO PETE. HE IS FANTASTIC.<br />

1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />

2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />

3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />

4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />

5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />

6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />

7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />

THE METHOD AND PRODUCTS WER EXCELLENT.<br />

8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />

NONE<br />

9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />

NONE<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

ARTIST: PETER PIACQUADIO<br />

CONTRACT #: A8625<br />

TITLE OF PROGRAM: TRUMPET PLAYER FOR THE SHOW - ONCE UPON A<br />

MATTRESS<br />

TYPE OF PROGRAM: ASSEMBLY<br />

DISTRICT/ SCHOOL:<br />

# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />

SOMERS/SOMERS HIGH SCHOOL<br />

# OF STUDENTS: GRADE(S) 9-12<br />

DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 3/12-18/12<br />

NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />

STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />

ARTIST: PETER POLINSKI<br />

CONTRACT #: A8643<br />

TITLE OF PROGRAM: DRUMMER FOR THE SHOW - A FUNNY THING<br />

HAPPENED ON THE WAY TO THE FORUM<br />

TYPE OF PROGRAM: ASSEMBLY<br />

DISTRICT/ SCHOOL: PUTNAM VALLEY/PUTNAM VALLEY HIGH SCHOOL<br />

# OF TEACHERS: 3<br />

# OF STUDENTS: 400 GRADE(S) 9-12<br />

DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 4/13-23/12<br />

NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />

STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />

1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />

1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />

1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />

2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />

3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />

4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />

5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />

6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />

2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />

3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />

4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />

5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />

6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM?<br />

NONE<br />

Y<br />

WHY?<br />

7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM?<br />

NONE<br />

Y<br />

WHY?<br />

8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />

NONE<br />

9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />

NONE<br />

8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />

NONE<br />

9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />

NONE<br />

Arts in Education Service - School Evaluations <strong>2011</strong>-<strong>2012</strong><br />

Page 246 of 332


ARTIST: PETER ROYSTON<br />

CONTRACT #: A8550<br />

TITLE OF PROGRAM: BRINGING LITERATURE TO LIFE IMPROV PLAY<br />

WRITING & SHOW<br />

TYPE OF PROGRAM: RESIDENCY<br />

DISTRICT/ SCHOOL: TARRYTOWN/WASHINGTON IRVING ELEM.<br />

# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />

# OF STUDENTS: 200 GRADE(S) 3<br />

DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 2/20-3/12/12<br />

NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />

STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 X STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />

ARTIST: PETER ROYSTON<br />

CONTRACT #: A8197<br />

TITLE OF PROGRAM: BRINGING LITERATURE TO LIFE IMPROV PLAY<br />

WRITING & SHOW<br />

TYPE OF PROGRAM: RESIDENCY<br />

DISTRICT/ SCHOOL:<br />

# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />

IRVINGTON/DOWS LANE ELEM.<br />

# OF STUDENTS: GRADE(S) 2<br />

DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 1/9-3/21/12<br />

NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />

STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 X STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />

1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />

1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />

1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />

2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />

3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />

4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />

5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />

6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />

7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />

HIS IS VERY ENGAGING AND TAKES STUDENTS THROUGH THE<br />

CREATIVE PROCESS FROM TEAM BUILDING TO SCRIPT WRITING TO<br />

HAVING THE CHANCE TO SHINE ON STAGE.<br />

8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />

THIS YEAR WE SHORTENED THE LENGTH OF THE PLAYS AND IT<br />

SEEMED TO WORK WELL FOR STUDENTS. WE RECOMMEND TO<br />

CONTINUE THIS OR COMBINE 2 CLASSES IF WE WANT FOR ONE<br />

LONGER PLAY.<br />

9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />

ARTIST:<br />

NONE<br />

PETER ROYSTON<br />

TITLE OF PROGRAM: SHAKESPEARE<br />

TYPE OF PROGRAM: ASSEMBLY<br />

DISTRICT/ SCHOOL:<br />

CONTRACT #: A8745<br />

IRVINGTON/IRVINGTON MIDDLE SCHOOL<br />

# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />

# OF STUDENTS: GRADE(S) 8<br />

DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE<br />

5/14-6/8/12<br />

NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />

STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 X STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

4<br />

3<br />

1.<br />

2.<br />

3.<br />

4.<br />

5.<br />

6.<br />

STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />

ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />

EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />

ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />

TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />

QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />

STUDENTS ARE HIGHLY ENGAGED IN ALL ASPECTS OF THEATER.<br />

POSITIVE FEEDBACK FROM PARENTS AND STAFF.<br />

8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />

NONE<br />

9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />

GREAT EXPERIENCE FOR ALL.<br />

ARTIST: PETER WIEGAND, JR.<br />

CONTRACT #: A7682<br />

TITLE OF PROGRAM: LIGHTING DESIGNER FOR THE FALL SHOW<br />

TYPE OF PROGRAM: RESIDENCY<br />

DISTRICT/ SCHOOL:<br />

KATONAH/LEWISBORO/JOHN JAY HIGH SCHOOL<br />

# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />

# OF STUDENTS: 400 GRADE(S) 9-12<br />

DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE<br />

10/23-11/24/11<br />

NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />

STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 X STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />

1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />

1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />

1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />

2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />

3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />

4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />

5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />

6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

4<br />

4<br />

1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />

2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />

3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />

4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />

5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />

6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />

THIS PROGRAM MADE SHAKESPEARE ACCESSIBLE AND MOST<br />

IMPORTANTLY ENGAGING FOR MIDDLE SCHOOL STUDENTS.<br />

8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />

ADDED TIME FOR REHEARSALS.<br />

9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />

NONE<br />

7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM?<br />

NONE<br />

8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />

NONE<br />

9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />

NONE<br />

Y<br />

WHY?<br />

Arts in Education Service - School Evaluations <strong>2011</strong>-<strong>2012</strong><br />

Page 247 of 332


ARTIST: PETER WIEGAND, JR.<br />

CONTRACT #: A8312<br />

TITLE OF PROGRAM: LIGHTING DESIGNER FOR THE SHOW - GUYS & DOLLS<br />

TYPE OF PROGRAM: RESIDENCY<br />

DISTRICT/ SCHOOL: KATONAH/LEWISBORO/JOHN JAY HIGH SCHOOL<br />

# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />

# OF STUDENTS: 80 GRADE(S) 9-12<br />

DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 2/1-3/22/12<br />

NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />

STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 X STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />

1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />

ARTIST: PHILADELPHIA MUSEUM OF ART CONTRACT #: A8406<br />

TITLE OF PROGRAM: VIDEO CONFERENCE - THE ART OF SPANISH &<br />

MEXICAN ARTISTS<br />

TYPE OF PROGRAM: ASSEMBLY<br />

DISTRICT/ SCHOOL: PELHAM/PELHAM MIDDLE SCHOOL<br />

# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />

# OF STUDENTS: 200 GRADE(S) 8<br />

DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 2/29-3/16/12<br />

NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />

STANDARD 1 STANDARD 2 STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4 X<br />

1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />

1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />

2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />

3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />

4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />

5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />

6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />

7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />

NONE<br />

8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />

NONE<br />

9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />

NONE<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />

2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />

3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />

4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />

5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />

6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />

7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />

STUDENTS WERE VERY ENGAGED IN THE DISCUSSION OF ART AND<br />

LEARNED ABOUT THE CONNECTION BETWEEN ART, HISTORY AND<br />

CULTURE.<br />

8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />

PUT ARTISTS NAMES ON SLIDES AND DATES THEY LIVED. ALSO,<br />

SHOW MORE OF THE INTRIGUING ARTISTS LIKE DALI AND RIVERA<br />

AND LESS OF THE ONES THAT DO NOT GRAB STUDENTS<br />

ATTENTIONS.<br />

9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />

NONE<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

ARTIST: PHYLLIS JANE MILLER<br />

CONTRACT #: A7923<br />

TITLE OF PROGRAM: KNITTING CRAFTS<br />

TYPE OF PROGRAM: WORKSHOP<br />

DISTRICT/ SCHOOL: CHAPPAQUA/WESTORCHARD ELEM.<br />

# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />

# OF STUDENTS: 9 GRADE(S) 3 & 4<br />

DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 1/11-2/29/12<br />

NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />

STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 X STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />

ARTIST: PLAN & PROCESS, LLC<br />

CONTRACT #: A8172<br />

TITLE OF PROGRAM: JANET ROSEFF - ART IN ARCHITECTURE<br />

TYPE OF PROGRAM: RESIDENCY<br />

DISTRICT/ SCHOOL: IRVINGTON/MAIN STREET SCHOOL<br />

# OF TEACHERS: 2<br />

# OF STUDENTS: 120 GRADE(S) 5<br />

DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 2/6-3/23/12<br />

NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />

STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 X STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4 X<br />

1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />

1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />

1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />

2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />

3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />

4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />

5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />

6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />

7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />

GREAT CLASS. LOVELY INSTRUCTER<br />

8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />

NONE<br />

9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />

NONE<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

N/<br />

1.<br />

2.<br />

3.<br />

4.<br />

5.<br />

6.<br />

STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />

ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />

EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />

ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />

TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />

QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />

JANET IS KNOWLEDGEABLE AND THE STUDENTS LEARNED A LOT.<br />

8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />

NONE<br />

9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />

NONE<br />

Arts in Education Service - School Evaluations <strong>2011</strong>-<strong>2012</strong><br />

Page 248 of 332


ARTIST: PLAN-IT, INC. - BERTRAM KONOWITZ CONTRACT #: A8553A<br />

TITLE OF PROGRAM: DEVELOPING IMPROVISATIONAL SKILLS IN THE<br />

MUSIC CLASSROOM<br />

TYPE OF PROGRAM: RESIDENCY<br />

DISTRICT/ SCHOOL: NEW ROCHELLE/ISAAC YOUNG MIDDLE SCHOOL<br />

# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />

# OF STUDENTS: 100 GRADE(S) 6-8<br />

DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 3/1-22/12<br />

NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />

STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 X STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />

ARTIST: PLAN-IT, INC. - BERTRAM KONOWITZ CONTRACT #: A8553B<br />

TITLE OF PROGRAM: DEVELOPING IMPROVISATIONAL SKILLS IN THE<br />

MUSIC CLASSROOM<br />

TYPE OF PROGRAM: RESIDENCY<br />

DISTRICT/ SCHOOL: NEW ROCHELLE/ALBERT LEONARD MIDDLE SCHOOL<br />

# OF TEACHERS: 5<br />

# OF STUDENTS: 200 GRADE(S) 6-8<br />

DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 3/3-4/19/12<br />

NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />

STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 X STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />

1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />

1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />

1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />

2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />

3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />

4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />

5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />

6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />

7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />

NONE<br />

8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />

NONE<br />

9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />

NICE PROGRAM CHILDREN ENJOYED IT.<br />

4<br />

4<br />

4<br />

4<br />

4<br />

4<br />

1.<br />

2.<br />

3.<br />

4.<br />

5.<br />

6.<br />

STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />

ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />

EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />

ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />

TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />

QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />

THIS PROGRAM IS AN EXCELLENT WAY FOR STUDENTS TO GRASP<br />

THE ESSENTIAL ELEMENTS OF MUSIC.<br />

8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />

NONE<br />

9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />

DR. K BRINGS WHAT WE TEACH INTO AN EVEN MORE FOCUSED<br />

AND INSIGHTFUL LEARNING EXPERIENCE THAT EVOKES LOTS OF<br />

ENTHUSIASTIC RESPONSE.<br />

ARTIST: PLAN-IT, INC. - BERTRAM KONOWITZ CONTRACT #: A8553D<br />

TITLE OF PROGRAM: DEVELOPING IMPROVISATIONAL SKILLS IN THE<br />

MUSIC CLASSROOM<br />

TYPE OF PROGRAM: RESIDENCY<br />

DISTRICT/ SCHOOL: NEW ROCHELLE/COLUMBUS ELEM.<br />

# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />

# OF STUDENTS: 23 GRADE(S) K-5<br />

DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 4/26/12<br />

NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />

STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 X STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />

ARTIST: PLAN-IT, INC. - BERTRAM KONOWITZ CONTRACT #: A8553C<br />

TITLE OF PROGRAM: DEVELOPING IMPROVISATIONAL SKILLS IN THE<br />

MUSIC CLASSROOM<br />

TYPE OF PROGRAM: RESIDENCY<br />

DISTRICT/ SCHOOL: NEW ROCHELLE/JEFFERSON ELEM.<br />

# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />

# OF STUDENTS: 130 GRADE(S) K-5<br />

DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 3/15/12<br />

NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />

STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 X STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />

1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />

1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />

1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />

2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />

3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />

4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />

5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />

6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

N/<br />

N/<br />

1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />

2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />

3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />

4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />

5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />

6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />

IT WAS VERY ENGAGING FOR THE STUDENTS WHO WERE GIVEN<br />

THE CHANCE TO PERFORM, CONDUCT AND IMPROVISE MUSIC.<br />

8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />

NONE<br />

9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />

NONE<br />

7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />

HE WAS A GREAT ADDITION FOR THE DAY. HE ENGAGED THE<br />

STUDENTS IN THE ACTIVITIES. THE CHILDREN WERE VERY<br />

RECEPTIVE AND ENJOYED PARTICIPATING IN THE LESSONS.<br />

8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />

NONE<br />

9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />

NONE<br />

Arts in Education Service - School Evaluations <strong>2011</strong>-<strong>2012</strong><br />

Page 249 of 332


ARTIST: PORT CHESTER COUNCIL FOR THE ART CONTRACT #: A7536I<br />

TITLE OF PROGRAM: LITERACY THROUGH THE ARTS - ANGELA MESSINA -<br />

KINDER TALES<br />

TYPE OF PROGRAM: RESIDENCY<br />

DISTRICT/ SCHOOL:<br />

# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />

PORT CHESTER/EDISON ELEM.<br />

# OF STUDENTS: GRADE(S) K-5<br />

DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 5/1-30/12<br />

NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />

STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 X STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4 X<br />

ARTIST: PORT CHESTER COUNCIL FOR THE ART CONTRACT #: A7537I<br />

TITLE OF PROGRAM: LITERACY THROUGH THE ARTS - ANGELA MESSINA -<br />

KINDER TALES<br />

TYPE OF PROGRAM: RESIDENCY<br />

DISTRICT/ SCHOOL:<br />

# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />

PORT CHESTER/JFK ELEM.<br />

# OF STUDENTS: GRADE(S) K-5<br />

DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 5/1-30/12<br />

NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />

STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 X STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4 X<br />

1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />

1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />

1.<br />

2.<br />

3.<br />

4.<br />

5.<br />

6.<br />

STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />

ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />

EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />

ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />

TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />

QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />

4<br />

4<br />

4<br />

5<br />

4<br />

4<br />

7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />

WONDERFUL STORY THEATER PROGRAM FOR STUDENTS AND<br />

VERY DEVELOPMENTALLY APPROPRIATE FOR THE GRADE LEVEL.<br />

8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />

NONE<br />

9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />

WISH IT WAS MORE THAN FOUR CLASSES.<br />

ARTIST: PORT CHESTER COUNCIL FOR THE ART CONTRACT #: A7539J<br />

TITLE OF PROGRAM: LITERACY THROUGH THE ARTS - ANGELA MESSINA -<br />

KINDER TALES<br />

TYPE OF PROGRAM: RESIDENCY<br />

DISTRICT/ SCHOOL:<br />

PORT CHESTER/PARK AVENUE ELEM.<br />

# OF TEACHERS: 2<br />

# OF STUDENTS: 75 GRADE(S) K-5<br />

DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE<br />

6/1-20/12<br />

NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />

STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 X STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4 X<br />

1.<br />

2.<br />

3.<br />

4.<br />

5.<br />

6.<br />

STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />

ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />

EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />

ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />

TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />

QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />

OUR KINDERGARTEN CHILDREN BENEFIT FROM ANGELA'S CALM<br />

DEMEANOR, HER CHOICE OF AGE APPROPRIATE STORIES AND USE<br />

OF LANGUAGE SKILLS TO ENGAGE IMAGINATIONS.<br />

8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />

NONE<br />

9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />

NONE<br />

ARTIST: PORT CHESTER COUNCIL FOR THE ART CONTRACT #: A7538J<br />

TITLE OF PROGRAM: LITERACY THROUGH THE ARTS - ANGELA MESSINA -<br />

KINDER TALES<br />

TYPE OF PROGRAM: RESIDENCY<br />

DISTRICT/ SCHOOL:<br />

PORT CHESTER/KING STREET ELEM.<br />

# OF TEACHERS: 2<br />

# OF STUDENTS: 75 GRADE(S) K-5<br />

DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 6/1-22/12<br />

NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />

STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 X STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4 X<br />

1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />

1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />

1.<br />

2.<br />

3.<br />

4.<br />

5.<br />

6.<br />

STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />

ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />

EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />

ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />

TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />

QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />

ANGELA BRINGS A QUIET, CALM PRESENCE TO THE STUDENTS<br />

WHO RESPOND IN KIND. THEN SHE ENCOURAGES THEIR CREATIVE<br />

RESPONSES TO STORIES AND THEATER GAMES.<br />

8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />

NONE<br />

9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />

NONE<br />

1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />

2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />

3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />

4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />

5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />

6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />

7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />

THE STUDENTS WERE ENGAGED AND EXCITED TO TAKE PART IN<br />

THE STORY PLAYS. NEW VOCABULARY WAS EXPLAINED IN A<br />

VARIETY OF WAYS.<br />

8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />

NONE<br />

9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />

NONE<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

4<br />

Arts in Education Service - School Evaluations <strong>2011</strong>-<strong>2012</strong><br />

Page 250 of 332


ARTIST: PORT CHESTER COUNCIL FOR THE ART CONTRACT #: A7539I<br />

TITLE OF PROGRAM: LITERACY THROUGH THE ARTS - BRIGITTE LORITZ<br />

TYPE OF PROGRAM: RESIDENCY<br />

DISTRICT/ SCHOOL: PORT CHESTER/PARK AVENUE ELEM.<br />

# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />

# OF STUDENTS: 80 GRADE(S) K-5<br />

DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 5/1-30/12<br />

NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />

STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 X STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4 X<br />

ARTIST: PORT CHESTER COUNCIL FOR THE ART CONTRACT #: A7537E<br />

TITLE OF PROGRAM: LITERACY THROUGH THE ARTS - BRIGITTE LORITZ<br />

TYPE OF PROGRAM: RESIDENCY<br />

DISTRICT/ SCHOOL:<br />

# OF TEACHERS: 6<br />

PORT CHESTER/JFK ELEM.<br />

# OF STUDENTS: 26 GRADE(S) K-6<br />

DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 1/1-31/12<br />

NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />

STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 X STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4 X<br />

1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />

1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />

1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />

2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />

3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />

4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />

5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />

6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />

2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />

3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />

4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />

5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />

6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />

STUDENTS LEARN VISUAL ARTS SKILLS THAT CARRY ON INTO<br />

THEIR ACADEMIC LEARNING.<br />

8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />

NONE<br />

9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />

AN AMAZING, REWARDING ART EXPERIENCE AS ALWAYS.<br />

7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />

GIVING STUDENTS AN AREA AND TIME WHEN THEY CAN BE<br />

CREATIVE GIVES STUDENTS AN OPPORTUNITY TO LEARN<br />

DIVERSELY.<br />

8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />

MORE ART CLASSES.<br />

9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />

LOVE HOW BRIGETTE GIVES THEM BACKGROUND KNOWLEDGE<br />

AND INTRODUCES NEW VOCABULARY TO THE CLASS.<br />

ARTIST: PORT CHESTER COUNCIL FOR THE ART<br />

CONTRACT #: A7537A<br />

TITLE OF PROGRAM: LITERACY THROUGH THE ARTS - BRIGITTE LORITZ<br />

TYPE OF PROGRAM: RESIDENCY<br />

DISTRICT/ SCHOOL:<br />

# OF TEACHERS: 6<br />

PORT CHESTER/JFK ELEM.<br />

# OF STUDENTS: 130 GRADE(S) 2<br />

DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 9/6-30/11<br />

NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />

STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 X STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4 X<br />

ARTIST: PORT CHESTER COUNCIL FOR THE ART CONTRACT #: A7536G<br />

TITLE OF PROGRAM: LITERACY THROUGH THE ARTS - BRIGITTE LORITZ<br />

TYPE OF PROGRAM: RESIDENCY<br />

DISTRICT/ SCHOOL:<br />

# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />

PORT CHESTER/EDISON ELEM.<br />

# OF STUDENTS: 87 GRADE(S) K-5<br />

DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 3/1-31/12<br />

NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />

STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 X STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4 X<br />

1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />

1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />

1.<br />

2.<br />

3.<br />

4.<br />

5.<br />

6.<br />

STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />

ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />

EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />

ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />

TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />

QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />

BRIGETTE IS AN EXPERIENCED PROFESSIONAL WHOSE ACTIVITIES<br />

ARE AGE APPROPRIATE AND VERY ENGAGING.<br />

8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />

NONE<br />

9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />

NONE<br />

1.<br />

2.<br />

3.<br />

4.<br />

5.<br />

6.<br />

STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />

ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />

EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />

ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />

TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />

QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />

BRIGITTE KNOWS HOW TO ENCOURAGE AND TEACH STUDENTS TO<br />

LOVE ART NO MATTER WHAT THEIR ABILITIES ARE.<br />

8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />

NONE<br />

9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />

STUDENTS LOVE TO LEARN FROM BRIGITTE.<br />

Arts in Education Service - School Evaluations <strong>2011</strong>-<strong>2012</strong><br />

Page 251 of 332


ARTIST: PORT CHESTER COUNCIL FOR THE ART CONTRACT #: A7538I<br />

TITLE OF PROGRAM: LITERACY THROUGH THE ARTS - BRIGITTE LORITZ<br />

TYPE OF PROGRAM: RESIDENCY<br />

DISTRICT/ SCHOOL: PORT CHESTER/KING STREET ELEM.<br />

# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />

# OF STUDENTS: 71 GRADE(S) K-5<br />

DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 5/1-31/12<br />

NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />

STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 X STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4 X<br />

ARTIST: PORT CHESTER COUNCIL FOR THE ART CONTRACT #: A7537F<br />

TITLE OF PROGRAM: LITERACY THROUGH THE ARTS - BRIGITTE LORITZ<br />

TYPE OF PROGRAM: RESIDENCY<br />

DISTRICT/ SCHOOL:<br />

# OF TEACHERS: 6<br />

PORT CHESTER/JFK ELEM.<br />

# OF STUDENTS: 150 GRADE(S) K-5<br />

DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 2/1-29/12<br />

NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />

STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 X STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4 X<br />

1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />

1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />

1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />

2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />

3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />

4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />

5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />

6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />

7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />

STUDENTS NEED ART NOW MORE THAN EVER TO BALANCE THE<br />

TESTING FRENZY.<br />

8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />

NONE<br />

9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />

SCHEDULING IS EXTREMELY DIFFICULT AND NO FAULT OF THE<br />

ARTIST. I DO NOT KNOW HOW TO SOLVE THAT PROBLEM.<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

1.<br />

2.<br />

3.<br />

4.<br />

5.<br />

6.<br />

STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />

ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />

EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />

ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />

TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />

QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />

THE STUDENTS WERE CONSTANTLY INVOLVED IN ALL ACTIVITIES<br />

AND THEY ENJOYED BEING EXPOSED TO ART AND USEAGE OF ART<br />

UTENSILS.<br />

8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />

MAYBE CONNECT SOME LESSONS TO LITERACY IF TIME PERMITS.<br />

9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />

NONE<br />

ARTIST: PORT CHESTER COUNCIL FOR THE ART CONTRACT #: A7536A<br />

TITLE OF PROGRAM: LITERACY THROUGH THE ARTS - CAMILLE LINEN<br />

TYPE OF PROGRAM: RESIDENCY<br />

DISTRICT/ SCHOOL:<br />

# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />

PORT CHESTER/EDISON ELEM.<br />

# OF STUDENTS: GRADE(S) K-5<br />

DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 11/1-30/11<br />

NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />

STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 X STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4 X<br />

1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />

1.<br />

2.<br />

3.<br />

4.<br />

5.<br />

6.<br />

STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />

ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />

EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />

ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />

TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />

QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />

WORKSHOPS WITH NEW PRINCIPALS TO EXPLAIN THE PROGRAM<br />

AND REQUEST WEB SITE TO CONTAIN UPDATED LITERACY<br />

CURRICULUM.<br />

8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />

NONE<br />

9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />

PRINCIPALS VERY RECEPTIVE TO INCREASED USE OF PROJECT<br />

BASED, MULTI-DISCIPLINED INSTRUCTION AS DEMONSTRATED BY<br />

PROGRAM.<br />

ARTIST: PORT CHESTER COUNCIL FOR THE ART CONTRACT #: A7537J<br />

TITLE OF PROGRAM: LITERACY THROUGH THE ARTS - CAROLEE<br />

BRAKEWOOD - KINDER MUSIC<br />

TYPE OF PROGRAM: RESIDENCY<br />

DISTRICT/ SCHOOL:<br />

PORT CHESTER/JFK ELEM.<br />

# OF TEACHERS: 3<br />

# OF STUDENTS: 150 GRADE(S) K-5<br />

DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE<br />

6/1-20/12<br />

NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />

STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 X STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4 X<br />

1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />

1.<br />

2.<br />

3.<br />

4.<br />

5.<br />

6.<br />

STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />

ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />

EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />

ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />

TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />

QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />

CAROLEE IS VERY DEDICATED AND ORGANIZED. SHE BRINGS A<br />

TRULY PROFESSIONAL APPROACH TO THE STUDENTS AND ALSO<br />

LETS THEIR CREATIVE RESPONSES TAKE OVER.<br />

8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />

NONE<br />

9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />

NONE<br />

Arts in Education Service - School Evaluations <strong>2011</strong>-<strong>2012</strong><br />

Page 252 of 332


ARTIST: PORT CHESTER COUNCIL FOR THE ART CONTRACT #: A7536J<br />

TITLE OF PROGRAM: LITERACY THROUGH THE ARTS - CAROLEE<br />

BRAKEWOOD - KINDER MUSIC<br />

TYPE OF PROGRAM: RESIDENCY<br />

DISTRICT/ SCHOOL:<br />

# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />

PORT CHESTER/EDISON ELEM.<br />

# OF STUDENTS: GRADE(S) K-5<br />

DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 6/1-20/12<br />

NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />

STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 X STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4 X<br />

ARTIST: PORT CHESTER COUNCIL FOR THE ART CONTRACT #: A7538E<br />

TITLE OF PROGRAM: LITERACY THROUGH THE ARTS - CAROLEE<br />

BRAKEWOOD - KINDER MUSIC<br />

TYPE OF PROGRAM: RESIDENCY<br />

DISTRICT/ SCHOOL: PORT CHESTER/KING STREET ELEM.<br />

# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />

# OF STUDENTS: 27 GRADE(S) K-5<br />

DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 1/3/31/12<br />

NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />

STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 X STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4 X<br />

1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />

1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />

1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />

2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />

3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />

4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />

5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />

6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />

7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />

THE PROGRAM IS ESSENTIAL FOR KINDERGARTEN STUDENTS. THE<br />

ARTS ARE AN INTERGRAL PART OF THE CURRICULUM AND THIS<br />

ALLOWS THEM TO BE EASILY ADAPTED.<br />

8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />

POSSIBLY SOME KIND OF GUIDE FOR THE TEACHER TO<br />

SUPPLEMENT LESSONS ON OUR OWN TIME.<br />

9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />

NONE<br />

ARTIST: PORT CHESTER COUNCIL FOR THE ART CONTRACT #: A7538D<br />

TITLE OF PROGRAM: LITERACY THROUGH THE ARTS - DANA RUSTON<br />

TYPE OF PROGRAM: RESIDENCY<br />

DISTRICT/ SCHOOL:<br />

PORT CHESTER/KING STREET ELEM.<br />

# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />

# OF STUDENTS: 75 GRADE(S) K-4<br />

DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE<br />

12/1-31/11<br />

NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />

STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 X STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4 X<br />

1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />

4<br />

4<br />

4<br />

5<br />

4<br />

N/<br />

1.<br />

2.<br />

3.<br />

4.<br />

5.<br />

6.<br />

STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />

ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />

EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />

ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />

TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />

QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />

STUDENTS ARE ENGAGED IN ALL ACTIVITIES. THE COMBINATION<br />

OF STORYTELLING AND MUSIC IS A BIG MOTIVATION.<br />

8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />

NONE<br />

9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />

NONE<br />

ARTIST: PORT CHESTER COUNCIL FOR THE ART CONTRACT #: A7537C<br />

TITLE OF PROGRAM: LITERACY THROUGH THE ARTS - FRANK SAN<br />

MARCO - NATIVE AMERICAN<br />

TYPE OF PROGRAM: RESIDENCY<br />

DISTRICT/ SCHOOL:<br />

PORT CHESTER/JFK ELEM.<br />

# OF TEACHERS: 2<br />

# OF STUDENTS: 100 GRADE(S) K-5<br />

DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 11/1-30/11<br />

NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />

STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 X STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4 X<br />

1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />

1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />

2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />

3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />

4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />

5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />

6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />

7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />

DANA HELPED STUDENTS DEVELOP SKILLS THEY NOW USE IN<br />

THEIR DAILY WORK.<br />

8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />

IF POSSIBLE, CONDENSE PROGRAM INTO FEWER WEEKS.<br />

9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />

THANK YOU DANA.<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

N/<br />

N/<br />

1.<br />

2.<br />

3.<br />

4.<br />

5.<br />

6.<br />

STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />

ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />

EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />

ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />

TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />

QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

N/<br />

7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />

THIS IS AN AUTHENTIC PRESENTATION OF NATIVE AMERICAN<br />

CULTURE AND LORE DONE IN HISTORICALLY ACCURATE DETAIL.<br />

FRANK SAN MARCO IS ENGAGING AND INSPIRING.<br />

8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />

NONE<br />

9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />

NONE<br />

Arts in Education Service - School Evaluations <strong>2011</strong>-<strong>2012</strong><br />

Page 253 of 332


ARTIST: PORT CHESTER COUNCIL FOR THE ART CONTRACT #: A7536E<br />

TITLE OF PROGRAM: LITERACY THROUGH THE ARTS - GRACE MORA<br />

TYPE OF PROGRAM: RESIDENCY<br />

DISTRICT/ SCHOOL:<br />

# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />

PORT CHESTER/EDISON ELEM.<br />

# OF STUDENTS: GRADE(S) K-5<br />

DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 1/1-31/12<br />

NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />

STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 X STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4 X<br />

ARTIST: PORT CHESTER COUNCIL FOR THE ART CONTRACT #: A7539B<br />

TITLE OF PROGRAM: LITERACY THROUGH THE ARTS - GRACE MORA<br />

TYPE OF PROGRAM: RESIDENCY<br />

DISTRICT/ SCHOOL: PORT CHESTER/PARK AVENUE ELEM.<br />

# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />

# OF STUDENTS: 75 GRADE(S) K-5<br />

DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 10/1-30/11<br />

NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />

STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 X STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4 X<br />

1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />

1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />

1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />

2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />

3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />

4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />

5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />

6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />

2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />

3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />

4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />

5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />

6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM?<br />

GRACE IS A TRUE GIFT TO THE STUDENTS.<br />

8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />

NONE<br />

9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />

NONE<br />

Y<br />

WHY?<br />

7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />

THE STUDENTS HAVE THE OPPORTUNITY TO EXPRESS<br />

THEMSELVES, USE THEIR IMAGINATION AND POSITIVELY SHOW<br />

THEIR FEELINGS THROUGH THIS MEDIA.<br />

8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />

NONE<br />

9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />

MORE DANCE AND MOVEMENT, i.e. HIP HOP.<br />

ARTIST: PORT CHESTER COUNCIL FOR THE ART<br />

CONTRACT #: A7539A<br />

TITLE OF PROGRAM: LITERACY THROUGH THE ARTS - GRACE MORA<br />

TYPE OF PROGRAM: RESIDENCY<br />

DISTRICT/ SCHOOL: PORT CHESTER/PARK AVENUE ELEM.<br />

# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />

# OF STUDENTS: 100 GRADE(S) 4 & 5<br />

DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 9/6-30/11<br />

NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />

STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 X STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4 X<br />

ARTIST: PORT CHESTER COUNCIL FOR THE ART CONTRACT #: A7539F<br />

TITLE OF PROGRAM: LITERACY THROUGH THE ARTS - GRACE MORA<br />

TYPE OF PROGRAM: RESIDENCY<br />

DISTRICT/ SCHOOL: PORT CHESTER/PARK AVENUE ELEM.<br />

# OF TEACHERS: 3<br />

# OF STUDENTS: 27 GRADE(S) K-5<br />

DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 2/1-29/12<br />

NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />

STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 X STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4 X<br />

1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />

1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />

1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />

2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />

3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />

4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />

5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />

6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />

7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />

THIS CLASS WAS ABOUT PLANNING AND DESIGNING A MURAL<br />

DEPICTING LOCAL HISTORY.<br />

8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />

NONE<br />

9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />

NONE<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />

2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />

3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />

4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />

5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />

6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />

7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />

MS. MORA IS WONDERFUL THE THE STUDENTS AND FINDS WAYS<br />

TO INCORPORATE ART WITH EDUCATION. SHE IS WELL<br />

RESPECTED BY ALL.<br />

8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />

NONE<br />

9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />

SHE IS VERY ORGANIZED AND HAD GREAT CONTROL OVER THE<br />

GROUP.<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

Arts in Education Service - School Evaluations <strong>2011</strong>-<strong>2012</strong><br />

Page 254 of 332


ARTIST: PORT CHESTER COUNCIL FOR THE ART CONTRACT #: A7539E<br />

TITLE OF PROGRAM: LITERACY THROUGH THE ARTS - GRACE MORA<br />

TYPE OF PROGRAM: RESIDENCY<br />

DISTRICT/ SCHOOL: PORT CHESTER/PARK AVENUE ELEM.<br />

# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />

# OF STUDENTS: 27 GRADE(S) K-5<br />

DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 1/3-31/12<br />

NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />

STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 X STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4 X<br />

ARTIST: PORT CHESTER COUNCIL FOR THE ART CONTRACT #: A7536D<br />

TITLE OF PROGRAM: LITERACY THROUGH THE ARTS - GRACE MORA<br />

TYPE OF PROGRAM: RESIDENCY<br />

DISTRICT/ SCHOOL:<br />

# OF TEACHERS: 3<br />

PORT CHESTER/EDISON ELEM.<br />

# OF STUDENTS: GRADE(S) K-5<br />

DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 12/1-31/11<br />

NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />

STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 X STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4 X<br />

1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />

1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />

1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />

2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />

3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />

4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />

5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />

6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />

7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />

THE PROGRAM ENHANCED THE CURRICULUM; STUDENTS WERE<br />

EXPOSED TO A CREATIVE OUTLET FOR EXPRESSION THAT WAS<br />

VITAL TO OVERALL INTELLECTUAL GROWTH.<br />

8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />

NONE<br />

9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />

NONE<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />

2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />

3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />

4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />

5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />

6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />

7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />

GRACE IS AN INSPIRATION FOR STUDENTS. SHE WORKS<br />

PATIENTLY AND GIVES THEM VERY APPROPRIATE ACTIVITIES.<br />

8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />

NONE<br />

9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />

NONE<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

ARTIST: PORT CHESTER COUNCIL FOR THE ART<br />

CONTRACT #: A7538G<br />

TITLE OF PROGRAM: LITERACY THROUGH THE ARTS - JO ANN BRODY<br />

TYPE OF PROGRAM: RESIDENCY<br />

DISTRICT/ SCHOOL: PORT CHESTER/KING STREET ELEM.<br />

# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />

# OF STUDENTS: GRADE(S) K-5<br />

DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 3/1-31/12<br />

NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />

STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 X STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4 X<br />

ARTIST: PORT CHESTER COUNCIL FOR THE ART CONTRACT #: A7537D<br />

TITLE OF PROGRAM: LITERACY THROUGH THE ARTS - JONATHAN KRUK<br />

TYPE OF PROGRAM: RESIDENCY<br />

DISTRICT/ SCHOOL:<br />

# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />

PORT CHESTER/JFK ELEM.<br />

# OF STUDENTS: GRADE(S) K-5<br />

DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 12/1-22/11<br />

NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />

STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 X STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4 X<br />

1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />

1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />

1.<br />

2.<br />

3.<br />

4.<br />

5.<br />

6.<br />

STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />

ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />

EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />

ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />

TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />

QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />

4<br />

5<br />

5<br />

4<br />

5<br />

5<br />

7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />

JO ANN IS A VERY STRONG EDUCATOR-ARTIST. SHE HAS A LOT OF<br />

HISTORICAL BACKGROUND TO PROVIDE.<br />

8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />

NONE<br />

9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />

NONE<br />

1.<br />

2.<br />

3.<br />

4.<br />

5.<br />

6.<br />

STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />

ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />

EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />

ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />

TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />

QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

N/<br />

7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />

JONATHAN IS A PROFESSIONAL STORYTELLER BUT ALSO A TRUE<br />

HISTORIAN.<br />

8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />

NONE<br />

9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />

NONE<br />

Arts in Education Service - School Evaluations <strong>2011</strong>-<strong>2012</strong><br />

Page 255 of 332


ARTIST: PORT CHESTER COUNCIL FOR THE ART CONTRACT #: A7538C<br />

TITLE OF PROGRAM: LITERACY THROUGH THE ARTS - LOU DEL BIANCO -<br />

STAR TALES<br />

TYPE OF PROGRAM: RESIDENCY<br />

DISTRICT/ SCHOOL: PORT CHESTER/KING STREET ELEM.<br />

# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />

# OF STUDENTS: 75 GRADE(S) K-5<br />

DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 11/1-30/11<br />

NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />

STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 X STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4 X<br />

ARTIST: PORT CHESTER COUNCIL FOR THE ART CONTRACT #: A7536C<br />

TITLE OF PROGRAM: LITERACY THROUGH THE ARTS - LOU DEL BIANCO -<br />

STAR TALES<br />

TYPE OF PROGRAM: RESIDENCY<br />

DISTRICT/ SCHOOL:<br />

# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />

PORT CHESTER/EDISON ELEM.<br />

# OF STUDENTS: 70 GRADE(S) K-5<br />

DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 11/1-30/11<br />

NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />

STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 X STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4 X<br />

1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />

1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />

1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />

2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />

3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />

4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />

5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />

6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />

7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />

STUDENTS WERE ACTIVE PARTICIPANTS. LOU WAS ENGAGING<br />

AND ENTERTAINING.<br />

8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />

NONE<br />

9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />

THIS IS A PROGRAM THAT I LOOK FORWARD TO EACH YEAR<br />

BECAUSE I KNOW MY STUDENTS WILL ENJOY IT AND THEY WILL<br />

LEARN A LOT.<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />

2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />

3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />

4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />

5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />

6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />

7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />

LOU'S STORYTELLING IS PHENOMENAL. HE ENGAGES THE<br />

CHILDREN AND MAKES THEM FEEL A PART OF THE STORY AND<br />

EXPERIENCE.<br />

8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />

NO NEED FOR IMPROVEMENT, JUST KEEP HIM COMING BACK.<br />

9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />

LOU'S STORYTELLING HAS MADE LEARNING WONDERFUL.<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

ARTIST: PORT CHESTER COUNCIL FOR THE ART<br />

CONTRACT #: A7539C<br />

TITLE OF PROGRAM: LITERACY THROUGH THE ARTS - LOU DEL BIANCO -<br />

STAR TALES<br />

TYPE OF PROGRAM: RESIDENCY<br />

DISTRICT/ SCHOOL: PORT CHESTER/PARK AVENUE ELEM.<br />

# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />

# OF STUDENTS: 65 GRADE(S) K-5<br />

DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 11/1-30/11<br />

NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />

STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 X STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4 X<br />

1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />

ARTIST: PORT CHESTER COUNCIL FOR THE ART CONTRACT #: A7536B<br />

TITLE OF PROGRAM: LITERACY THROUGH THE ARTS - MAI KONG<br />

TYPE OF PROGRAM: RESIDENCY<br />

DISTRICT/ SCHOOL:<br />

# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />

PORT CHESTER/EDISON ELEM.<br />

# OF STUDENTS: GRADE(S) K-5<br />

DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 10/1-31/11<br />

NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />

STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 X STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4 X<br />

1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />

1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />

2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />

3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />

4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />

5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />

6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />

7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />

OUR STUDENTS ENJOYED THE SHOW.<br />

8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />

NONE<br />

9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />

NONE<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />

2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />

3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />

4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />

5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />

6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />

7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />

MS. MAI HAS A WONDERFUL WAY WITH MAKING THE STUDENTS<br />

FEEL AS IF THEY ARE ARTISTS. HER DIRECTIONS ARE KEY FOR<br />

UNDERSTANDING.<br />

8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />

NONE<br />

9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />

SHE IS ABSOLUTELY WONDERFUL.<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

Arts in Education Service - School Evaluations <strong>2011</strong>-<strong>2012</strong><br />

Page 256 of 332


ARTIST: PORT CHESTER COUNCIL FOR THE ART CONTRACT #: A7538F<br />

TITLE OF PROGRAM: LITERACY THROUGH THE ARTS - MAI KONG<br />

TYPE OF PROGRAM: RESIDENCY<br />

DISTRICT/ SCHOOL: PORT CHESTER/KING STREET ELEM.<br />

# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />

# OF STUDENTS: 72 GRADE(S) K-5<br />

DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 2/1-24/12<br />

NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />

STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 X STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4 X<br />

ARTIST: PORT CHESTER COUNCIL FOR THE ART CONTRACT #: A7537B<br />

TITLE OF PROGRAM: LITERACY THROUGH THE ARTS - MAI KONG<br />

TYPE OF PROGRAM: RESIDENCY<br />

DISTRICT/ SCHOOL:<br />

# OF TEACHERS: 6<br />

PORT CHESTER/JFK ELEM.<br />

# OF STUDENTS: 138 GRADE(S) K-5<br />

DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 10/1-30/11<br />

NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />

STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 X STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4 X<br />

1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />

1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />

1.<br />

2.<br />

3.<br />

4.<br />

5.<br />

6.<br />

STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />

ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />

EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />

ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />

TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />

QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />

MAI INSPIRES THE STUDENTS TO CREATE. SHE IS PATIENT WITH<br />

INEXPERIENCED ARTISTS. THE STUDENTS ADMIRE HER TALENT.<br />

8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />

NONE<br />

9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />

SHE INTERACTS VERY WELL WITH THE STUDENTS AND THEY<br />

ENJOY HER CLASS.<br />

1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />

2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />

3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />

4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />

5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />

6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />

7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />

IT IS ALWAYS A PLEASURE TO WORK WITH MAI. SHE IS<br />

KNOWLEDGEABLE, PATIENT, AND ALWAYS APPRECIATES THE<br />

CHILDREN'S ART PIECES.<br />

8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />

NONE<br />

9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />

WE VALUE MAIE'S SUGGESTIONS AND ENJOY HER APPROACH<br />

WITH STUDENTS. ALL THE CHILDREN LOVE HER LESSONS AND<br />

SEEING HOW ACCOMPLISHED THEY'VE BECOME AS ARTISTS.<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

N/<br />

5<br />

ARTIST: PORT CHESTER COUNCIL FOR THE ART<br />

CONTRACT #: A7538A<br />

TITLE OF PROGRAM: LITERACY THROUGH THE ARTS - MAI KONG<br />

TYPE OF PROGRAM: RESIDENCY<br />

DISTRICT/ SCHOOL: PORT CHESTER/KING STREET ELEM.<br />

# OF TEACHERS: 3<br />

# OF STUDENTS: 75 GRADE(S) K-5<br />

DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 9/6-30/11<br />

NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />

STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 X STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4 X<br />

ARTIST: PORT CHESTER COUNCIL FOR THE ART CONTRACT #: A7538B<br />

TITLE OF PROGRAM: LITERACY THROUGH THE ARTS - MAI KONG<br />

TYPE OF PROGRAM: RESIDENCY<br />

DISTRICT/ SCHOOL: PORT CHESTER/KING STREET ELEM.<br />

# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />

# OF STUDENTS: 72 GRADE(S) K-5<br />

DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 10/1-31/11<br />

NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />

STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 X STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4 X<br />

1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />

1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />

1.<br />

2.<br />

3.<br />

4.<br />

5.<br />

6.<br />

STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />

ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />

EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />

ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />

TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />

QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />

MAI IS AN INSPIRING TEACHER WHO IS ALSO A SUPPORTIVE AND<br />

PATIENT TEACHER. THE STUDENTS HAVE BEEN PROVIDED THE<br />

INSTRUCTION TO DEVELOP THEIR ARTISTIC CREATIVITY BY<br />

INTERGRATING THEIR KNOWLEDGE OF WORLD ART INTO OUR<br />

CURRICULUM.<br />

8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />

NONE<br />

9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />

WE ARE GRATFUL TO HAVE THIS PROGRAM AT OUR SCHOOL.<br />

1.<br />

2.<br />

3.<br />

4.<br />

5.<br />

6.<br />

STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />

ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />

EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />

ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />

TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />

QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />

MAI INSPIRES THE STUDENTS TO CREATE. SHE IS PATIENT WITH<br />

INEXPERIENCED ARTISTS. THE STUDENTS ADMIRE HER TALENT.<br />

8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />

NONE<br />

9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />

SHE INTERACTS VERY WELL WITH THE STUDENTS AND THEY<br />

ENJOY HER CLASS.<br />

Arts in Education Service - School Evaluations <strong>2011</strong>-<strong>2012</strong><br />

Page 257 of 332


ARTIST: PORT CHESTER COUNCIL FOR THE ART CONTRACT #: A7539G<br />

TITLE OF PROGRAM: LITERACY THROUGH THE ARTS - MERET PIDERMAN<br />

TYPE OF PROGRAM: RESIDENCY<br />

DISTRICT/ SCHOOL: PORT CHESTER/PARK AVENUE ELEM.<br />

# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />

# OF STUDENTS: 60 GRADE(S) K-5<br />

DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 3/1-31/12<br />

NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />

STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 X STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4 X<br />

ARTIST: PORT CHESTER COUNCIL FOR THE ART CONTRACT #: A7536F<br />

TITLE OF PROGRAM: LITERACY THROUGH THE ARTS - MICHELLE MOERITZ<br />

TYPE OF PROGRAM: RESIDENCY<br />

DISTRICT/ SCHOOL:<br />

# OF TEACHERS: 3<br />

PORT CHESTER/EDISON ELEM.<br />

# OF STUDENTS: 70 GRADE(S) K-5<br />

DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 2/29-12<br />

NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />

STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 X STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4 X<br />

1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />

1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />

1.<br />

2.<br />

3.<br />

4.<br />

5.<br />

6.<br />

STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />

ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />

EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />

ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />

TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />

QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />

FLASHBACKS NATIVE DANCE IS A WONDERFUL OPPORTUNITY FOR<br />

OUR STUDENTS TO LEARN ABOUT NATIVE AMERICAN VALUES,<br />

SYMBOLS AND HISTORY. STUDENTS BECOME INSTANTLY<br />

ENGAGED IN ACTIVITIES COMBINING ART, DESIGN, CRAFTS AND<br />

DANCE.<br />

8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />

NONE<br />

9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />

THIS IS A GREAT PROGRAM AND SHOULD REMAIN PART OF THE<br />

CURRICULUM.<br />

ARTIST: PORT CHESTER COUNCIL FOR THE ART CONTRACT #: A7537G<br />

TITLE OF PROGRAM: LITERACY THROUGH THE ARTS - MICHELLE MOERITZ<br />

TYPE OF PROGRAM: RESIDENCY<br />

DISTRICT/ SCHOOL:<br />

PORT CHESTER/JFK ELEM.<br />

# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />

# OF STUDENTS: 100 GRADE(S) K-5<br />

DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE<br />

3/1-31/12<br />

NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />

STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 X STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4 X<br />

1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />

1.<br />

2.<br />

3.<br />

4.<br />

5.<br />

6.<br />

STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />

ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />

EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />

ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />

TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />

QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />

5<br />

5<br />

4<br />

4<br />

4<br />

3<br />

7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />

SINGING ENGAGES ALL LEARNERS AND PROVIDES OPPORTUNITIES<br />

TO TEACH TOLERANCE ALONG WITH THE EXPRESSIVE QUALITIES<br />

OF LANGUAGE.<br />

8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />

CD PLAYER THAT CONSISTENTLY WORKS.<br />

9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />

THANK YOU.<br />

ARTIST: PORT CHESTER COUNCIL FOR THE ART CONTRACT #: A7539D<br />

TITLE OF PROGRAM: LITERACY THROUGH THE ARTS - MICHELLE<br />

MOERITZ - DANCE USA<br />

TYPE OF PROGRAM: RESIDENCY<br />

DISTRICT/ SCHOOL: PORT CHESTER/PARK AVENUE ELEM.<br />

# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />

# OF STUDENTS: 75 GRADE(S) K-5<br />

DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 12/1-30/11<br />

NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />

STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 X STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4 X<br />

1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />

1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />

2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />

3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />

4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />

5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />

6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />

7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />

MICHELLE HAS DONE A WONDERFUL JOB WITH OUR STUDENTS.<br />

SHE HAS A GREAT RAPPORT AND KNOWS THEM BY NAME AND<br />

MAKES SING AND SIGN FUN AND ENGAGING FOR THEM.<br />

8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />

NONE<br />

9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />

NONE<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

1.<br />

2.<br />

3.<br />

4.<br />

5.<br />

6.<br />

STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />

ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />

EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />

ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />

TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />

QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />

STUDENTS LEARNED HISTORY OF THE US THROUGH DANCE AND<br />

MUSIC FROM EACH ERA. THEY ENHANCED MULTIPLE<br />

INTELLIGENCES THROUGH MULTI MODALITY LEARNING.<br />

8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />

NONE<br />

9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />

BRAVO MICHELLE. I LOOK FORWARD TO WORKING WITH THIS<br />

TALENTED ARTIST NEXT YEAR.<br />

Arts in Education Service - School Evaluations <strong>2011</strong>-<strong>2012</strong><br />

Page 258 of 332


ARTIST: PORT CHESTER COUNCIL FOR THE ART CONTRACT #: A7536H<br />

TITLE OF PROGRAM: LITERACY THROUGH THE ARTS - NINA GABRALE<br />

CAVA<br />

TYPE OF PROGRAM: RESIDENCY<br />

DISTRICT/ SCHOOL:<br />

# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />

PORT CHESTER/EDISON ELEM.<br />

# OF STUDENTS: GRADE(S) K-5<br />

DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 4/1-30/12<br />

NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />

STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 X STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4 X<br />

ARTIST: PORT CHESTER COUNCIL FOR THE ART CONTRACT #: A7539H<br />

TITLE OF PROGRAM: LITERACY THROUGH THE ARTS - NINA GABRIELE<br />

CAVA<br />

TYPE OF PROGRAM: RESIDENCY<br />

DISTRICT/ SCHOOL: PORT CHESTER/PARK AVENUE ELEM.<br />

# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />

# OF STUDENTS: 75 GRADE(S) K-5<br />

DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 4/1-30/12<br />

NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />

STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 X STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4 X<br />

1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />

1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />

1.<br />

2.<br />

3.<br />

4.<br />

5.<br />

6.<br />

STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />

ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />

EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />

ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />

TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />

QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />

NINA WAS CREATIVE AND VIBRANT. SHE ENGAGED STUDENTS<br />

WITH HER STORIES AND INSPIRED THEM TO CREATE THEIR OWN<br />

PLAYS.<br />

8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />

NONE<br />

9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />

ALWAYS A PLEASURE TO HAVE HER VISIT.<br />

ARTIST: PORT CHESTER COUNCIL FOR THE ART CONTRACT #: A7538H<br />

TITLE OF PROGRAM: LITERACY THROUGH THE ARTS - NINA GABRIELE<br />

CUVA<br />

TYPE OF PROGRAM: RESIDENCY<br />

DISTRICT/ SCHOOL: PORT CHESTER/KING STREET ELEM.<br />

# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />

# OF STUDENTS: 65 GRADE(S) K-5<br />

DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 4/1-30/12<br />

NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />

STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 X STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4 X<br />

1.<br />

2.<br />

3.<br />

4.<br />

5.<br />

6.<br />

STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />

ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />

EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />

ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />

TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />

QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />

4<br />

4<br />

4<br />

5<br />

N/<br />

N/<br />

7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />

NINA IS PASSIONATE ABOUT WHAT SHE DOES. SHE TRULY ENJOYS<br />

WORKING WITH CHILDREN AND SHARING HER CRAFT.<br />

8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />

NONE<br />

9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />

AN ENJOYABLE EXPERIENCE FOR TEACHERS AND STUDENTS.<br />

STUDENTS LOOK FORWARD TO NINA'S VISIT.<br />

ARTIST: PORT CHESTER COUNCIL FOR THE ART CONTRACT #: A7537H<br />

TITLE OF PROGRAM: LITERACY THROUGH THE ARTS - NINA GABRIELE<br />

CUVA<br />

TYPE OF PROGRAM: RESIDENCY<br />

DISTRICT/ SCHOOL:<br />

# OF TEACHERS: 6<br />

PORT CHESTER/JFK ELEM.<br />

# OF STUDENTS: 133 GRADE(S) K-5<br />

DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 4/1-30/12<br />

NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />

STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 X STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4 X<br />

1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />

1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />

1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />

2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />

3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />

4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />

5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />

6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />

7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />

NONE<br />

8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />

MORE TIME FOR STUDENT STORYTELLING.<br />

9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />

STUDENTS ENJOYED LEARNING NEW VOCABULARY FROM NINA.<br />

THEY APPLIED IT TO THEIR DAILY LIFE.<br />

4<br />

3<br />

3<br />

4<br />

3<br />

N/<br />

1.<br />

2.<br />

3.<br />

4.<br />

5.<br />

6.<br />

STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />

ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />

EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />

ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />

TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />

QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />

5<br />

3<br />

3<br />

5<br />

N/<br />

N/<br />

7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />

WHILE THE INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS IS GREAT, WE WOULD<br />

LIKE TO SEE MORE STUDENTS PERFORMANCES. WE WOULD LIKE<br />

THE STUDENTS TO HAVE SOMETHING TO WORK TOWARD<br />

COMPLETION.<br />

8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />

NONE<br />

9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />

PERHAPS AROUND THE 3RD SESSION, STUDENTS CAN BE GIVEN A<br />

STORY/PLAY TO FINE TUNE. THEN PERFORM THEIR STORIES AT<br />

THE END. OVERALL, THE STUDENTS LOVED IT.<br />

Arts in Education Service - School Evaluations <strong>2011</strong>-<strong>2012</strong><br />

Page 259 of 332


ARTIST:<br />

POTATOE HILL POETRY<br />

TITLE OF PROGRAM: ANDREW GREEN - POETRY<br />

TYPE OF PROGRAM: WORKSHOP<br />

DISTRICT/ SCHOOL:<br />

BRIARCLIFF/TODD ELEM.<br />

CONTRACT #: A8449<br />

# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />

# OF STUDENTS: 61 GRADE(S) 4<br />

DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE<br />

5/15/12<br />

NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />

STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 X STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />

1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />

1.<br />

2.<br />

3.<br />

4.<br />

5.<br />

6.<br />

STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />

ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />

EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />

ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />

TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />

QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />

ANDREW'S VISIT IS ONE OF THE HIGHLIGHTS OF OUR WRITING<br />

PROGRAM. BY THE END OF THE DAY, EVERY CHILD HAS BECOME A<br />

POET.<br />

8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />

NONE<br />

9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />

NONE<br />

ARTIST: PRISMATIC MAGIC<br />

CONTRACT #: A7931<br />

TITLE OF PROGRAM: BLACK HISTORY TRIBUTE LASER LIGHT SHOW<br />

TYPE OF PROGRAM: ASSEMBLY<br />

DISTRICT/ SCHOOL:<br />

OSSINING/ROOSEVELT<br />

# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />

# OF STUDENTS: 304 GRADE(S) 5<br />

DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE<br />

2/28/12<br />

NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />

STANDARD 1 STANDARD 2 STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />

ARTIST: PRISMATIC MAGIC<br />

CONTRACT #: A8073<br />

TITLE OF PROGRAM: AMERICAN PRIDE SPECTACULAR - LASER LIGHT<br />

SHOW<br />

TYPE OF PROGRAM: ASSEMBLY<br />

DISTRICT/ SCHOOL:<br />

KATONAH/LEWISBORO/MEADOWPOND ELEM.<br />

# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />

# OF STUDENTS: 69 GRADE(S) 2<br />

DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE<br />

5/29/12<br />

NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />

STANDARD 1 STANDARD 2 STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />

1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />

1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />

2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />

3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />

4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />

5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />

6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />

7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />

THE LASER PERFORMANCE IS LIKE NOTHING OUR STUDENTS HAVE<br />

EVER SEEN BEFORE.<br />

8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />

LAST YEAR THE VOLUME OF THE MUSIC WAS LOUDER AND MADE<br />

THE EXPERIENCE MORE FUN WITH A FEELING OF BEING AT<br />

CONCERT.<br />

9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />

ARTIST:<br />

NONE<br />

PRISMATIC MAGIC<br />

CONTRACT #: A7835<br />

TITLE OF PROGRAM: HALLOWEEN SPOOKTACULAR - LASER LIGHT SHOW<br />

TYPE OF PROGRAM: ASSEMBLY<br />

DISTRICT/ SCHOOL:<br />

NEW ROCHELLE/DAVIS ELEM. SCHOOL<br />

# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />

# OF STUDENTS: 700 GRADE(S) K-5<br />

DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 10/24/11<br />

NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />

STANDARD 1 STANDARD 2 STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />

4<br />

5<br />

4<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />

1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />

1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />

2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />

3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />

4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />

5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />

6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />

4<br />

4<br />

3<br />

2<br />

4<br />

2<br />

1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />

2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />

3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />

4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />

5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />

6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM?<br />

NONE<br />

Y<br />

WHY?<br />

7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y<br />

THIS IS A GREAT SHOW. THE STUDENTS LOVE IT.<br />

WHY?<br />

8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />

NONE<br />

9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />

NONE<br />

8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />

NONE<br />

9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />

NONE<br />

Arts in Education Service - School Evaluations <strong>2011</strong>-<strong>2012</strong><br />

Page 260 of 332


ARTIST: PRISMATIC MAGIC<br />

CONTRACT #: A7544<br />

TITLE OF PROGRAM: LASER LIGHT SHOW<br />

TYPE OF PROGRAM: ASSEMBLY<br />

DISTRICT/ SCHOOL: CHAPPAQUA/ROARING BROOK ELEM.<br />

# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />

# OF STUDENTS: 450 GRADE(S) K-4<br />

DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 6/20/12<br />

NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />

STANDARD 1 STANDARD 2 STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />

ARTIST: PRISMATIC MAGIC<br />

CONTRACT #: A8479<br />

TITLE OF PROGRAM: LASER LIGHT SHOW - SPRING JAM SECTACULAR<br />

TYPE OF PROGRAM: ASSEMBLY<br />

DISTRICT/ SCHOOL: CHAPPAQUA/WESTORCHARD ELEM.<br />

# OF TEACHERS: 5<br />

# OF STUDENTS: 513 GRADE(S) K-4<br />

DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 3/21/12<br />

NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />

STANDARD 1 STANDARD 2 STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />

1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />

1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />

1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />

2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />

3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />

4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />

5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />

6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />

7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />

PROGRAM WAS ENTERTAINING AND FUN. THE STUDENTS WERE<br />

ENGAGED AND THE LIGHT SHOW WAS VERY APPROPRIATE.<br />

8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />

ALTHOUGH THE LIGHT SHOW WAS TAILORED TO A SPECIFIC<br />

AUDIENCE, THE 20 MINUTE PRE-SHOW COULD BE MODIFIED FOR A<br />

YOUNGER AUDIENCE.<br />

9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />

THIS HIGH ENERGY, FUN ASEMBLY WAS GREAT.<br />

4<br />

5<br />

3<br />

3<br />

5<br />

5<br />

1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />

2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />

3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />

4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />

5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />

6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />

7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />

NONE<br />

8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />

NONE<br />

9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />

NONE<br />

5<br />

5<br />

4<br />

5<br />

5<br />

N/<br />

ARTIST: PRISMATIC MAGIC<br />

CONTRACT #: A8170<br />

TITLE OF PROGRAM: LASER LIGHT SHOW - TEAM CHARACTER ED SHOW<br />

TYPE OF PROGRAM: ASSEMBLY<br />

DISTRICT/ SCHOOL: HENDRICK HUDSON/FURNACE WOODS ELEM.<br />

# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />

# OF STUDENTS: 342 GRADE(S) K-5<br />

DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 1/9/12<br />

NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />

STANDARD 1 STANDARD 2 STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />

ARTIST: PRISMATIC MAGIC<br />

CONTRACT #: A7764<br />

TITLE OF PROGRAM: WINTER HOLIDAY LIGHT SHOW<br />

TYPE OF PROGRAM: ASSEMBLY<br />

DISTRICT/ SCHOOL: NEW ROCHELLE/BARNARD EARLY CHILDHOOD CENT<br />

# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />

# OF STUDENTS: 640 GRADE(S) PRE K-2<br />

DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 12/21/11<br />

NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />

STANDARD 1 STANDARD 2 STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />

1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />

1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />

1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />

2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />

3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />

4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />

5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />

6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />

7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />

GREAT MESSAGE. THERE WAS A GOOD PACE TO THE SHOW, IT<br />

KEPT THEIR ATTENTION.<br />

8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />

IT NEEDS SOME FOLLOW THROUGH TO BETTER CONNECT THE<br />

SONGS. THE MESSAGE WAS A BIT LOST. NOT REINFORCED<br />

ENOUGH.<br />

9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />

LASER SHOW WAS WONDERFUL. FUN AND ENGAGING WITH<br />

EDUCATIONAL MESSAGE.<br />

5<br />

5<br />

4.2<br />

4.1<br />

4.4<br />

5<br />

1.<br />

2.<br />

3.<br />

4.<br />

5.<br />

6.<br />

STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />

ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />

EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />

ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />

TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />

QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />

HE IS THE BEST PRESENTER AND UNDERSTANDS HOW TO RELAY<br />

THE INFORMATION TO OUR STUDENTS.<br />

8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />

NONE<br />

9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />

GREAT JOB.<br />

Arts in Education Service - School Evaluations <strong>2011</strong>-<strong>2012</strong><br />

Page 261 of 332


ARTIST: PROJECT IMPACT<br />

CONTRACT #: A8473A<br />

TITLE OF PROGRAM: GERRY FIERST - INTRO TO THEATER<br />

TYPE OF PROGRAM: RESIDENCY<br />

DISTRICT/ SCHOOL: NEW ROCHELLE/JEFFERSON ELEM.<br />

# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />

# OF STUDENTS: 120 GRADE(S) 1<br />

DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 3/6-8/12<br />

NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />

STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 X STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />

ARTIST: PROJECT IMPACT<br />

CONTRACT #: A7998<br />

TITLE OF PROGRAM: KEVIN BROOKS - INTRO TO IMPRESSIONIST PAINTING<br />

TYPE OF PROGRAM: RESIDENCY<br />

DISTRICT/ SCHOOL: NEW ROCHELLE/JEFFERSON ELEM.<br />

# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />

# OF STUDENTS: 115 GRADE(S) 3<br />

DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 12/5-15/11<br />

NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />

STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 X STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />

1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />

1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />

1.<br />

2.<br />

3.<br />

4.<br />

5.<br />

6.<br />

STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />

ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />

EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />

ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />

TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />

QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />

GERRY IS FANTASTIC WITH CHILDREN. HE GAVE THE STUDENTS<br />

IDEAS TO TELL STORIES AND THEY WORKED ON THEM AT HOME TO<br />

FERFECT THEIR PERFORMANCES. HE IS GREAT.<br />

8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />

NONE<br />

9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />

NONE<br />

1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />

2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />

3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />

4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />

5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />

6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />

7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />

KEVIN IS AMAZING. HIS TEACHING STYLE AND EDUCATIONAL<br />

PHILOSOPHY ENABLES HIM TO CONNECT COMPLETELY WITH<br />

STUDENTS.<br />

8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />

NONE<br />

9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />

NONE<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

ARTIST: PROJECT IMPACT<br />

CONTRACT #: A8473B<br />

TITLE OF PROGRAM: LAURA BOSS - POETRY<br />

TYPE OF PROGRAM: RESIDENCY<br />

DISTRICT/ SCHOOL: NEW ROCHELLE/JEFFERSON ELEM.<br />

# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />

# OF STUDENTS: 100 GRADE(S) 2<br />

DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 5/8 & 9/12<br />

NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />

STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 X STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />

1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />

1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />

2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />

3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />

4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />

5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />

6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />

7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? N WHY?<br />

MS. BOSS SEEMS TO KNOW HER CRAFT BUT DOES NOT PROVIDE<br />

ENOUGH EXPLICIT DIRECTIONS AND STRUCTURE FOR SECOND<br />

GRADERS.<br />

8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />

USE ACTUAL POETRY THAT IS MEANT FOR CHILDREN AT THE<br />

GRADE LEVEL YOU ARE WORKING WITH. TRY TO MAKE IT FUN FOR<br />

YOUNG CHILDREN.<br />

9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />

SHE READ HER POEM ABOUT HER AUNT WHO HAS DABETES AND<br />

CHECKS HER URINE. INAPPROPRIATE FOR 2ND GRADERS.<br />

4<br />

2<br />

2<br />

4<br />

4<br />

1<br />

ARTIST: PROJECT IMPACT<br />

CONTRACT #: A8581<br />

TITLE OF PROGRAM: MARK STANKIEWICZ - BECOMING AN<br />

AUTHOR/ILLUSTRATOR<br />

TYPE OF PROGRAM: RESIDENCY<br />

DISTRICT/ SCHOOL:<br />

NEW ROCHELLE/JEFFERSON ELEM.<br />

# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />

# OF STUDENTS: 120 GRADE(S) K<br />

DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE<br />

4/3-5/12<br />

NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />

STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 X STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />

1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />

1.<br />

2.<br />

3.<br />

4.<br />

5.<br />

6.<br />

STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />

ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />

EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />

ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />

TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />

QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />

MARK IS WONDERFUL WITH THE STUDENTS. THEY MADE A CLASS<br />

BOOK FOR EACH CLASS THAT WILL LIVE IN THE LIBRARY FOR THE<br />

REST OF THE YEAR. FANTASTIC.<br />

8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />

NONE<br />

9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />

NONE<br />

Arts in Education Service - School Evaluations <strong>2011</strong>-<strong>2012</strong><br />

Page 262 of 332


ARTIST: PROJECT IMPACT<br />

CONTRACT #: A8032<br />

TITLE OF PROGRAM: MARK STANKIEWICZ - BECOMING AN<br />

AUTHOR/ILLUSTRATOR<br />

TYPE OF PROGRAM: RESIDENCY<br />

DISTRICT/ SCHOOL: NEW ROCHELLE/JEFFERSON ELEM.<br />

# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />

# OF STUDENTS: 95 GRADE(S) 4<br />

DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 1/10-12/12<br />

NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />

STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 X STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />

1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />

ARTIST: RACHEL VAIL<br />

CONTRACT #: A7914<br />

TITLE OF PROGRAM: AUTHOR VISIT<br />

TYPE OF PROGRAM: ASSEMBLY/WORKSHOP<br />

DISTRICT/ SCHOOL: EASTCHESTER/EASTCHESTER MIDDLE SCHOOL<br />

# OF TEACHERS: 7<br />

# OF STUDENTS: 250 GRADE(S) 6<br />

DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 10/21/11<br />

NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />

STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 X STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />

1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />

1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />

2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />

3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />

4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />

5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />

6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />

7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />

MARK IS VERY GOOD WITH THE STUDENTS IN THAT HE INSPIRES<br />

THEM. HE IS A GREAT MODEL FOR STUDENTS AND IS ABLE TO<br />

EXTRACT THINKING AND PERFORMANCE FROM THEM.<br />

8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />

NONE<br />

9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />

NONE<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />

2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />

3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />

4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />

5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />

6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />

7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />

NONE<br />

8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />

NONE<br />

9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />

NONE<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

ARTIST: RALPH FLETCHER<br />

CONTRACT #: A7519<br />

TITLE OF PROGRAM: AUTHOR VISIT<br />

TYPE OF PROGRAM: ASSEMBLY/WORKSHOP<br />

DISTRICT/ SCHOOL: IRVINGTON/IRVINGTON MIDDLE SCHOOL<br />

# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />

# OF STUDENTS: 125 GRADE(S) 6<br />

DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 4/17/12<br />

NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />

STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 X STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />

ARTIST: RAMZI EL-EDLIBI<br />

CONTRACT #: A8748<br />

TITLE OF PROGRAM: CHOREOGRAPHER - DANCES FROM SOUTH AMERICA<br />

TYPE OF PROGRAM: RESIDENCY<br />

DISTRICT/ SCHOOL:<br />

# OF TEACHERS: 3<br />

PELHAM/PROSPECT HILL ELEM.<br />

# OF STUDENTS: 60 GRADE(S) 3<br />

DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 5/21-25/12<br />

NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />

STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 X STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4 X<br />

1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />

1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />

1.<br />

2.<br />

3.<br />

4.<br />

5.<br />

6.<br />

STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />

ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />

EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />

ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />

TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />

QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />

IT WAS A VERY MEANINGFUL EXPERIENCE. THE STUDENTS WERE<br />

WELL PREPARED AND TOOK ADVANTAGE OF THE QUALITY TIME<br />

SPENT WITH RALPH.<br />

8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />

NONE<br />

9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />

IT WAS WELL WORTH IT.<br />

1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />

2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />

3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />

4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />

5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />

6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />

7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />

HE WAS SO CALM AND PATRIENT AND WAS ABLE TO BREAK IT<br />

DOWN SO ALL STUDENTS WERE SUCCESSFUL.<br />

8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />

NONE<br />

9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />

RAMZI IS EXTREMELY FLEXIBLE AND HARD WORKING.<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

Arts in Education Service - School Evaluations <strong>2011</strong>-<strong>2012</strong><br />

Page 263 of 332


ARTIST: RANDOM FARM KIDS THEATRE, INC. CONTRACT #: A7952<br />

TITLE OF PROGRAM: ALEXIS GRAUSZ & JULIE SCHWARTZ - FREE TO BE<br />

YOU AND ME<br />

TYPE OF PROGRAM: ASSEMBLY/RESIDENCY<br />

DISTRICT/ SCHOOL:<br />

# OF TEACHERS: 3<br />

PELHAM/COLONIAL ELEM.<br />

# OF STUDENTS: 60 GRADE(S) 2<br />

DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 1/6-3/22/12<br />

NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />

STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />

1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />

ARTIST: RANDOM FARM KIDS THEATRE, INC. CONTRACT #: A7901<br />

TITLE OF PROGRAM: THE NEW KID - A MUSICAL<br />

TYPE OF PROGRAM: ASSEMBLY<br />

DISTRICT/ SCHOOL:<br />

# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />

PELHAM/SIWANOY ELEM.<br />

# OF STUDENTS: GRADE(S) 2-4<br />

DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 11/4/11<br />

NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />

STANDARD 1 STANDARD 2 STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />

1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />

1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />

2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />

3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />

4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />

5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />

6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />

7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />

3.5<br />

5<br />

3<br />

4<br />

4<br />

4<br />

STUDENTS WERE EXCITED ABOUT THEIR PERFORMANCE. IT WAS<br />

AGE APPROPRIATE AND FUN. INSTRUCTORS WERE FUN,<br />

ENGAGING AND PROFESSIONAL AND NICE.<br />

8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />

SPACE IS AN ISSUE IN OUR SCHOOL AND THAT IMPACTED QUALITY<br />

OF REHEARSALS. MAKING CHANGES MID REHEARSALS WAS HARD<br />

FOR STUDENTS TO REMEMBER.<br />

9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />

SONGS THAT THE WHOLE GROUP SING TOGETHER SHOULD BE<br />

REHEARSED PRIOR TO LAST DAY.<br />

1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />

2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />

3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />

4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />

5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />

6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />

7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? N WHY?<br />

AT LEAST NOT FOR ELEMENTARY STUDENTS. THEME NOT TOO<br />

MATURE BUT SPECIFIC CONTENT WAS.<br />

8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />

NONE<br />

9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />

NONE<br />

4<br />

4<br />

3<br />

4<br />

4<br />

N/<br />

ARTIST: RANDOM FARM KIDS THEATRE, INC. CONTRACT #: A8095<br />

TITLE OF PROGRAM: THE NEW KID - A MUSICAL<br />

TYPE OF PROGRAM: ASSEMBLY<br />

DISTRICT/ SCHOOL:<br />

# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />

PELHAM/PROSPECT HILL ELEM.<br />

# OF STUDENTS: 200 GRADE(S) 2-5<br />

DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 1/11/12<br />

NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />

STANDARD 1 STANDARD 2 STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />

ARTIST: RANDOM FARM KIDS THEATRE, INC. CONTRACT #: A7871<br />

TITLE OF PROGRAM: THE NEW KID - A MUSICAL<br />

TYPE OF PROGRAM: ASSEMBLY<br />

DISTRICT/ SCHOOL:<br />

# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />

BYRAM HILLS/WAMPUS ELEM.<br />

# OF STUDENTS: 650 GRADE(S) 3-5<br />

DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 11/7/11<br />

NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />

STANDARD 1 STANDARD 2 STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />

1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />

1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />

1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />

2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />

3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />

4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />

5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />

6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />

7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />

EXCELLENT PERFORMANCE AND MESSAGE.<br />

8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />

NONE<br />

9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />

THE PROGRAM WAS EXCELLENT. THE STUDENTS ENJOYED IT AND<br />

THE OVERALL MESSAGE WAS CLEAR.<br />

4<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

1.<br />

2.<br />

3.<br />

4.<br />

5.<br />

6.<br />

STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />

ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />

EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />

ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />

TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />

QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

N/<br />

7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />

PROGRAM SENDS A GREAT MESSAGE TO STUDENTS ABOUT<br />

FITTING IN TO A POPULAR GROUP AND MAKING GOOD DECISIONS.<br />

STUDENTS WERE FANTASTIC. SUPER TALENTED SHOW WAS SO<br />

WELL CHOREOGRAPHED.<br />

8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />

NONE<br />

9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />

MY ONLY CONCERN WAS THAT THE PROGRAM MAY HAVE BEEN A<br />

LITTLE YOUNG FOR THE 3RD GRADES IN OUR SCHOOL.<br />

Arts in Education Service - School Evaluations <strong>2011</strong>-<strong>2012</strong><br />

Page 264 of 332


ARTIST: RAPHAEL F. BLUE (RAY BLUE)<br />

CONTRACT #: A8728<br />

TITLE OF PROGRAM: MUSICAL STORYTELLING - SILENT WARRIOR<br />

TYPE OF PROGRAM: ASSEMBLY<br />

DISTRICT/ SCHOOL: LAKELAND/THOMAS JEFFERSON ELEM.<br />

# OF TEACHERS: 12 # OF STUDENTS: GRADE(S) K-5<br />

DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 5/2/12<br />

NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />

STANDARD 1 STANDARD 2 STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4 X<br />

ARTIST: RAYMOND CLIFTON MATIAS<br />

CONTRACT #: A7578<br />

TITLE OF PROGRAM: RED HAWK DANCERS<br />

TYPE OF PROGRAM: ASSEMBLY<br />

DISTRICT/ SCHOOL: BYRAM HILLS/H.C. CRITTENDEN MIDDLE SCHOOL<br />

# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />

# OF STUDENTS: 250 GRADE(S) 7<br />

DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 10/5/11<br />

NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />

STANDARD 1 STANDARD 2 STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4 X<br />

1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />

1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />

1.<br />

2.<br />

3.<br />

4.<br />

5.<br />

6.<br />

STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />

ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />

EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />

ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />

TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />

QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

N/<br />

7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />

THE PROGRAM HAD THE AUDIENCE TRULY ENGAGED. THE<br />

TOUCHING STORY ENHANCED BY BEAUTIFUL MUSIC AND TOLD IN A<br />

RELAXED CALMING MANNER WAS A PLESANT CHANGE FROM<br />

SOME OTHER PROGRAMS THAT FEEL THEY NEED TO BE LOUD AND<br />

SILLY TO REACH THE STUDENTS.<br />

8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />

NONE<br />

9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />

THE STUDENTS LOVED THE JAZZ MUSIC AND RETAINED THE<br />

MESSAGE OF THE SILENT WARRIOR. GREAT JOB.<br />

ARTIST: RAYMOND CLIFTON MATIAS<br />

TITLE OF PROGRAM: RED HAWK DANCERS<br />

TYPE OF PROGRAM: ASSEMBLY<br />

DISTRICT/ SCHOOL:<br />

OSSINING/PARK SCHOOL<br />

CONTRACT #: A7648<br />

# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />

# OF STUDENTS: 500 GRADE(S) PRE K &<br />

DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE<br />

11/15/11<br />

NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />

STANDARD 1 STANDARD 2 STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4 X<br />

1.<br />

2.<br />

3.<br />

4.<br />

5.<br />

6.<br />

STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />

ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />

EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />

ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />

TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />

QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

N/<br />

7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />

THEY WER KNOWLEDGEABLE AND INTERESTING. THE CHILDREN<br />

WERE ENGAGED AND LOVED THE AUDIENCE PARTICIPATION<br />

PARTS. COSTUMES AND DANCES WERE GREAT.<br />

8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />

NONE<br />

9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />

VERY INFORMATIVE. IMPORTANT TO TALK ABOUT THE<br />

STEREOTYPES OF NATIVE AMERICANS. IT WAS DONE IN A<br />

THOUGHTFUL WAY.<br />

ARTIST: RAYMOND CLIFTON MATIAS<br />

TITLE OF PROGRAM: RED HAWK DANCERS<br />

TYPE OF PROGRAM: ASSEMBLY<br />

DISTRICT/ SCHOOL:<br />

BRIARCLIFF/TODD ELEM.<br />

CONTRACT #: A8096<br />

# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />

# OF STUDENTS: 211 GRADE(S) K-4<br />

DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 12/9/11<br />

NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />

STANDARD 1 STANDARD 2 STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4 X<br />

1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />

1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />

1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />

2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />

3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />

4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />

5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />

6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

N/<br />

1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />

2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />

3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />

4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />

5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />

6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />

3<br />

4<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

N/<br />

7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />

THIS WAS AN EXCELLENT, BEAUTIFUL PRESENTATION THAT<br />

HIGHLIGHTED CULTURAL ASPECTS OF NATIVE AMERICANS.<br />

8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />

NONE<br />

9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />

NONE<br />

7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />

INFORMATIVE AND ENTERTAINING. IT TIED IN WITH NATIVE<br />

AMERICAN CURRICULUM.<br />

8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />

GEAR SPECIFICALLY TO GRADE LEVEL CURRICULUM.<br />

9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />

NONE<br />

Arts in Education Service - School Evaluations <strong>2011</strong>-<strong>2012</strong><br />

Page 265 of 332


ARTIST: REPORTBULLYING.COM<br />

CONTRACT #: A7898<br />

TITLE OF PROGRAM: FRIENDS HELPING FRIENDS SHOW<br />

TYPE OF PROGRAM: ASSEMBLY<br />

DISTRICT/ SCHOOL: KATONAH/LEWISBORO/INCREASE MILLER ELEM.<br />

# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />

# OF STUDENTS: 360 GRADE(S) K-5<br />

DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 10/25/11<br />

NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />

STANDARD 1 STANDARD 2 STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />

ARTIST: REVELATOR'S, INC.<br />

CONTRACT #: A8784<br />

TITLE OF PROGRAM: MARION JONES-ARCHER - WORLD DANCES<br />

TYPE OF PROGRAM: RESIDENCY<br />

DISTRICT/ SCHOOL: MT.VERNON/LONGFELLOW MIDDLE SCHOOL<br />

# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />

# OF STUDENTS: GRADE(S) 7 & 8<br />

DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 4/17-6/21/12<br />

NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />

STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 X STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4 X<br />

1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />

1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />

1.<br />

2.<br />

3.<br />

4.<br />

5.<br />

6.<br />

STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />

ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />

EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />

ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />

TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />

QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />

THE ASSEMBLY WAS EXCELLENT. FOR THE OLDER KIDS HE<br />

TACKLED THE ISSUE HEADON, THE ENTERTAINMENT WAS<br />

SECONDARY. THEY PROVIDED RESOURCES FOR A YEAR LONG<br />

ANTI-BULLYING PROGRAM. THE ASSEMBLY FOR YOUNGER<br />

STUDENTS WAS ONE OF THE BEST, FUNNY, ENTERTAINING AND HE<br />

HAD THE STUDENTS ROLE PLAYING MESSAGES.<br />

8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />

NONE<br />

9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />

NONE<br />

1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />

2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />

3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />

4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />

5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />

6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />

7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />

NONE<br />

8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />

NONE<br />

9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />

NONE<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

ARTIST: RICHARD CONLEY<br />

CONTRACT #: A8066<br />

TITLE OF PROGRAM: WOODWIND PLAYER FOR THE SHOW - BARNUM<br />

TYPE OF PROGRAM: ASSEMBLY<br />

DISTRICT/ SCHOOL: NORTH SALEM/NORTH SALEM MS & HS<br />

# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />

# OF STUDENTS: 200 GRADE(S) 6-12<br />

DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 2/4-12/12<br />

NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />

STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />

1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />

ARTIST: RICHARD DASHNAW<br />

CONTRACT #: A7711<br />

TITLE OF PROGRAM: GUITAR PLAYER FOR THE SHOW - ANNIE GET YOUR<br />

GUN<br />

TYPE OF PROGRAM: ASSEMBLY<br />

DISTRICT/ SCHOOL: LAKELAND/WALTER PANAS HIGH SCHOOL<br />

# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />

# OF STUDENTS: 100 GRADE(S) 9-12<br />

DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 11/14-19/11<br />

NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />

STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />

1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />

1.<br />

2.<br />

3.<br />

4.<br />

5.<br />

6.<br />

STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />

ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />

EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />

ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />

TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />

QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />

RICH IS AN AMAZING MUSICIAN AND AN INCREDIBLE MODEL FOR<br />

STUDENTS TO FOLLOW.<br />

8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />

NONE<br />

9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />

NONE<br />

1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />

2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />

3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />

4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />

5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />

6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />

7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />

NONE<br />

8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />

NONE<br />

9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />

NONE<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

Arts in Education Service - School Evaluations <strong>2011</strong>-<strong>2012</strong><br />

Page 266 of 332


ARTIST: RICHARD DASHNAW<br />

CONTRACT #: A8804<br />

TITLE OF PROGRAM: GUITAR PLAYER FOR THE SHOW - MY FAIR LADY<br />

TYPE OF PROGRAM: ASSEMBLY<br />

DISTRICT/ SCHOOL: LAKELAND/WALTER PANAS HIGH SCHOOL<br />

# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />

# OF STUDENTS: 200 GRADE(S) 9-12<br />

DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 4/30-5/5/12<br />

NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />

STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />

ARTIST: RICHARD ELLIS<br />

CONTRACT #: A8126<br />

TITLE OF PROGRAM: DIKKI ELLIS - MAGIC CIRCUS SHOW<br />

TYPE OF PROGRAM: ASSEMBLY<br />

DISTRICT/ SCHOOL: PLEASANTVILLE/BEDFORD ROAD ELEM.<br />

# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />

# OF STUDENTS: 110 GRADE(S) K<br />

DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 6/18/12<br />

NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />

STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />

1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />

1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />

1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />

2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />

3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />

4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />

5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />

6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />

2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />

3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />

4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />

5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />

6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM?<br />

NONE<br />

8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />

NONE<br />

9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />

NONE<br />

Y<br />

WHY?<br />

7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />

AGE APPROPRIATE, PROFESSIONAL AND KEPT THE STUDENTS<br />

ATTENTION FOR THE ENTIRE PERFORMANCE.<br />

8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />

NONE<br />

9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />

THANK YOU.<br />

ARTIST: RICHARD RICCA<br />

CONTRACT #: A8538B<br />

TITLE OF PROGRAM: CIVIL WAR MEMORABILIA & STORIES<br />

TYPE OF PROGRAM: WORKSHOP<br />

DISTRICT/ SCHOOL: IRVINGTON/IRVINGTON MIDDLE SCHOOL<br />

# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />

# OF STUDENTS: GRADE(S) 7<br />

DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 4/30/12<br />

NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />

STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 X STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4 X<br />

ARTIST: RICHARD RICCA<br />

CONTRACT #: A8538A<br />

TITLE OF PROGRAM: CIVIL WAR MEMORABILIA & STORIES<br />

TYPE OF PROGRAM: WORKSHOP<br />

DISTRICT/ SCHOOL: IRVINGTON/IRVINGTON MIDDLE SCHOOL<br />

# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />

# OF STUDENTS: GRADE(S) 7<br />

DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 4/20/12<br />

NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />

STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 X STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4 X<br />

1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />

1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />

1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />

2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />

3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />

4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />

5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />

6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />

2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />

3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />

4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />

5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />

6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM?<br />

GREAT EXHIBIT.<br />

Y<br />

WHY?<br />

7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM?<br />

PERFECT.<br />

Y<br />

WHY?<br />

8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />

NONE<br />

9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />

NONE<br />

8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />

NONE<br />

9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />

GREAT PRESENTATION.<br />

Arts in Education Service - School Evaluations <strong>2011</strong>-<strong>2012</strong><br />

Page 267 of 332


ARTIST: RICHARD RICCA<br />

CONTRACT #: A7581<br />

TITLE OF PROGRAM: CIVIL WAR MEMORABILIA & STORIES<br />

TYPE OF PROGRAM: WORKSHOP<br />

DISTRICT/ SCHOOL: BYRAM HILLS/H.C. CRITTENDEN MIDDLE SCHOOL<br />

# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />

# OF STUDENTS: GRADE(S) 7<br />

DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 5/21/12<br />

NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />

STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 X STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4 X<br />

ARTIST: RICHARD RICCA<br />

CONTRACT #: A7834<br />

TITLE OF PROGRAM: CIVIL WAR MEMORABILIA & STORIES<br />

TYPE OF PROGRAM: WORKSHOP<br />

DISTRICT/ SCHOOL: PUTNAM VALLEY/PUTNAM VALLEY MIDDLE SCHOOL<br />

# OF TEACHERS: 3<br />

# OF STUDENTS: 150 GRADE(S) 7<br />

DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 5/7/12<br />

NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />

STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 X STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4 X<br />

1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />

1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />

1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />

2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />

3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />

4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />

5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />

6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />

2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />

3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />

4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />

5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />

6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />

4<br />

5<br />

5<br />

4<br />

4<br />

N/<br />

7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM?<br />

VERY WELL PREPARED AND INFORMATIVE.<br />

Y<br />

WHY?<br />

7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />

HE IS SO KNOWLEDGEABLE AND HIS ARTIFACTS ARE AMAZING.<br />

8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />

NONE<br />

9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />

NONE<br />

8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />

NONE<br />

9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />

NONE<br />

ARTIST: RICHARD RICCA<br />

CONTRACT #: A8219A<br />

TITLE OF PROGRAM: CIVIL WAR MEMORABILIA & STORIES<br />

TYPE OF PROGRAM: WORKSHOP<br />

DISTRICT/ SCHOOL: CHAPPAQUA/BELL MIDDLE SCHOOL<br />

# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />

# OF STUDENTS: 195 GRADE(S) 7<br />

DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 5/23/12<br />

NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />

STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 X STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4 X<br />

ARTIST: RICHARD RICCA<br />

CONTRACT #: A8219B<br />

TITLE OF PROGRAM: CIVIL WAR MEMORABILIA & STORIES<br />

TYPE OF PROGRAM: WORKSHOP<br />

DISTRICT/ SCHOOL: CHAPPAQUA/SEVEN BRIDGES MIDDLE SCHOOL<br />

# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />

# OF STUDENTS: GRADE(S) 7<br />

DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 5/24-25/12<br />

NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />

STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 X STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4 X<br />

1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />

1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />

1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />

2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />

3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />

4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />

5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />

6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />

7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />

VERY INTERESTING.<br />

8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />

NONE<br />

9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />

NONE<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

4<br />

5<br />

N/<br />

1.<br />

2.<br />

3.<br />

4.<br />

5.<br />

6.<br />

STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />

ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />

EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />

ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />

TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />

QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />

PRESENTATION EXTREMELY INTERESTING AND KEPT STUDENT'S<br />

ATTENTION.<br />

8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />

NONE<br />

9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />

NONE<br />

Arts in Education Service - School Evaluations <strong>2011</strong>-<strong>2012</strong><br />

Page 268 of 332


ARTIST: RICKY MYINT<br />

CONTRACT #: A8529<br />

TITLE OF PROGRAM: TRUMPET PLAYER FOR THE SHOW - ONCE UPON A<br />

MATTRESS<br />

TYPE OF PROGRAM: ASSEMBLY<br />

DISTRICT/ SCHOOL:<br />

# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />

SOMERS/SOMERS HIGH SCHOOL<br />

# OF STUDENTS: 50 GRADE(S) 9-12<br />

DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 3/12-18/12<br />

NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />

STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />

1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />

ARTIST: RIITTA POLLOCK dba RIITTA'S ART STU CONTRACT #: A7559<br />

TITLE OF PROGRAM: PAINTING<br />

TYPE OF PROGRAM: WORKSHOP<br />

DISTRICT/ SCHOOL: KATONAH/LEWISBORO/KATONAH ELEM. SCHOOL<br />

# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />

# OF STUDENTS: 10 GRADE(S) 3 & 4<br />

DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 9/27-11/15/11<br />

NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />

STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 X STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />

1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />

1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />

2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />

3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />

4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />

5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />

6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />

7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />

NONE<br />

8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />

NONE<br />

9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />

NONE<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />

2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />

3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />

4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />

5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />

6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />

7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />

NONE<br />

8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />

NONE<br />

9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />

NONE<br />

4<br />

4<br />

4<br />

4<br />

4<br />

4<br />

ARTIST: RIITTA POLLOCK dba RIITTA'S ART STU CONTRACT #: A7899<br />

TITLE OF PROGRAM: VISUAL ARTIST - THE MASTERS<br />

TYPE OF PROGRAM: RESIDENCY<br />

DISTRICT/ SCHOOL: EASTCHESTER/ANNE HUTCHINSON ELEM.<br />

# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />

# OF STUDENTS: 21 GRADE(S) 3 & 4<br />

DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 10/24-11/10/11<br />

NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />

STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 X STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />

ARTIST: RIITTA POLLOCK dba RIITTA'S ART STU CONTRACT #: A7568<br />

TITLE OF PROGRAM: VISUAL ARTIST - THE MASTERS<br />

TYPE OF PROGRAM: ASSEMBLY<br />

DISTRICT/ SCHOOL: EASTCHESTER/GREENVALE ELEM.<br />

# OF TEACHERS: 12 # OF STUDENTS: 166 GRADE(S) 3-5<br />

DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 1/31-2/16/12<br />

NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />

STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 X STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />

1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />

1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />

1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />

2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />

3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />

4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />

5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />

6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />

7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />

CHILDREN ARE HIGHLY INTERESTED IN THE BIOGRAPHICAL<br />

INFORMATION PRESENTED. THEY ESPECIALLY LOVED CREATING<br />

THEIR OWN ART INSPIRED BY EACH ARTIST.<br />

8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />

GIVE US SHORT BIOGRAPHICAL SUMMARIES FOR EACH ARTIST.<br />

WE STUDY BIOGRAPHIES AND THIS MIGHT FURTHER SUPPORT<br />

WHAT WE TEACH.<br />

9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />

I THOROUGHTLY ENJOYED WATCHING ALL OF MY STUDENTS<br />

ACHIEVE A WONDERFUL DEGREE OF SUCCESS.<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

N/<br />

1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />

2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />

3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />

4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />

5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />

6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />

7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />

RIITA IS PATIENT, KIND AND WONDERFUL WITH THE CHILDREN.<br />

8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />

NONE<br />

9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />

NONE<br />

4<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

Arts in Education Service - School Evaluations <strong>2011</strong>-<strong>2012</strong><br />

Page 269 of 332


ARTIST: RIITTA POLLOCK dba RIITTA'S ART STU<br />

CONTRACT #: A8782<br />

TITLE OF PROGRAM: VISUAL ARTIST - THE MASTERS<br />

TYPE OF PROGRAM: WORKSHOP<br />

DISTRICT/ SCHOOL: EASTCHESTER/WAVERLY EARLY CHILDHOOD CTR<br />

# OF TEACHERS: 10 # OF STUDENTS: 225 GRADE(S) 1<br />

DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 4/23-5/24/12<br />

NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />

STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 X STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />

ARTIST: RITA MARTELL<br />

CONTRACT #: A8051A<br />

TITLE OF PROGRAM: ALL THE WORLD'S A STAGE I<br />

TYPE OF PROGRAM: WORKSHOP<br />

DISTRICT/ SCHOOL:<br />

# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />

PELHAM/PROSPECT HILL ELEM.<br />

# OF STUDENTS: 15 GRADE(S) 1-3<br />

DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 1/9-3/12/12<br />

NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />

STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 X STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />

1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />

1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />

1.<br />

2.<br />

3.<br />

4.<br />

5.<br />

6.<br />

STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />

ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />

EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />

ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />

TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />

QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />

SHE DOES A WONDERFUL JOB ENGAGING THE STUDENTS AND<br />

BRINGING THE GREAT MASTERS TO LIFE. THE STUDENTS LOVED<br />

THE INTERACTIVE, HANDS-ON EXPERIENCE OF CREATING A WORK<br />

OF ART.<br />

8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />

NONE<br />

9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />

IT IS A PLEASURE TO HAVE HER EACH YEAR.<br />

1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />

2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />

3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />

4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />

5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />

6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />

7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />

NONE<br />

8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />

NONE<br />

9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />

NONE<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

N/<br />

ARTIST: RITA MARTELL<br />

CONTRACT #: A8051B<br />

TITLE OF PROGRAM: ALL THE WORLD'S A STAGE II<br />

TYPE OF PROGRAM: WORKSHOP<br />

DISTRICT/ SCHOOL:<br />

# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />

PELHAM/PROSPECT HILL ELEM.<br />

# OF STUDENTS: 15 GRADE(S) 3-5<br />

DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 1/9-3/12/12<br />

NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />

STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 X STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />

ARTIST: RIZA HEQUIBAL PRINTUP<br />

CONTRACT #: A8394<br />

TITLE OF PROGRAM: HARP PLAYER FOR THE SHOW - MY FAIR LADY<br />

TYPE OF PROGRAM: ASSEMBLY<br />

DISTRICT/ SCHOOL: LAKELAND/WALTER PANAS HIGH SCHOOL<br />

# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />

# OF STUDENTS: 200 GRADE(S) 9-12<br />

DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 4/30-5/5/12<br />

NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />

STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />

1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />

1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />

1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />

2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />

3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />

4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />

5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />

6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

N/<br />

1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />

2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />

3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />

4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />

5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />

6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM?<br />

NONE<br />

Y<br />

WHY?<br />

7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM?<br />

NONE<br />

Y<br />

WHY?<br />

8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />

NONE<br />

9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />

NONE<br />

8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />

NONE<br />

9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />

NONE<br />

Arts in Education Service - School Evaluations <strong>2011</strong>-<strong>2012</strong><br />

Page 270 of 332


ARTIST: ROBERT ANTHONY MACK<br />

CONTRACT #: A8682<br />

TITLE OF PROGRAM: PERFORMANCE PRACTICES OF THE MALE VOCALIST<br />

TYPE OF PROGRAM: WORKSHOP<br />

DISTRICT/ SCHOOL: NEW ROCHELLE/NEW ROCHELLE HS<br />

# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />

# OF STUDENTS: 50 GRADE(S) 10-12<br />

DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 4/2-5/12<br />

NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />

STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 X STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />

1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />

ARTIST: ROBERT ARTHURS<br />

CONTRACT #: A8434<br />

TITLE OF PROGRAM: TRUMPET PLAYER FOR THE SHOW - THE DROWSY<br />

CHAPERONE<br />

TYPE OF PROGRAM: ASSEMBLY<br />

DISTRICT/ SCHOOL: KATONAH/LEWISBORO/JOHN JAY MIDDLE SCHOOL<br />

# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />

# OF STUDENTS: 75 GRADE(S) 6-8<br />

DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 3/3-17/12<br />

NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />

STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />

1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />

1.<br />

2.<br />

3.<br />

4.<br />

5.<br />

6.<br />

STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />

ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />

EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />

ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />

TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />

QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

N/<br />

7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />

MR. MACK PRESENTED A VARIETY OF VOCAL TECHNIQUES, WARM<br />

UPS AND PERFORMANCE SKILLS TO IMPROVE BREATHING AND<br />

PLACEMENT. THE STUDENTS WERE VERY RECEPTIVE AND<br />

ENGEGED.<br />

8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />

NONE<br />

9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />

EXCELLENT.<br />

1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />

2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />

3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />

4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />

5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />

6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />

7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />

THE PIT ORCHESTRA WAS AWESOME.<br />

8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />

NONE<br />

9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />

THANK YOU.<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

N/<br />

ARTIST: ROBERT FLANZ<br />

CONTRACT #: A8432<br />

TITLE OF PROGRAM: BASS GUITARIST FOR THE SHOW - THE DROWSY<br />

CHAPERONE<br />

TYPE OF PROGRAM: ASSEMBLY<br />

DISTRICT/ SCHOOL: KATONAH/LEWISBORO/JOHN JAY MIDDLE SCHOOL<br />

# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />

# OF STUDENTS: GRADE(S) 6-8<br />

DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 3/3-17/12<br />

NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />

STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />

ARTIST: ROBERT GERONIMO<br />

CONTRACT #: A8526<br />

TITLE OF PROGRAM: LIGHTING DESIGNER FOR SHOW - ONCE UPON A<br />

MATTRESS<br />

TYPE OF PROGRAM: RESIDENCY<br />

DISTRICT/ SCHOOL:<br />

# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />

SOMERS/SOMERS HIGH SCHOOL<br />

# OF STUDENTS: 50 GRADE(S) 9-12<br />

DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 3/12-18/12<br />

NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />

STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 X STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />

1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />

1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />

1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />

2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />

3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />

4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />

5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />

6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

N/<br />

1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />

2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />

3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />

4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />

5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />

6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM?<br />

THE PIT ORCHESTRA WAS AWESOME.<br />

Y<br />

WHY?<br />

7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM?<br />

NONE<br />

Y<br />

WHY?<br />

8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />

NONE<br />

9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />

NONE<br />

8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />

NONE<br />

9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />

NONE<br />

Arts in Education Service - School Evaluations <strong>2011</strong>-<strong>2012</strong><br />

Page 271 of 332


ARTIST: ROBERT JACOBY<br />

CONTRACT #: A8574<br />

TITLE OF PROGRAM: REED PLAYER FOR THE SHOW - SUGAR<br />

TYPE OF PROGRAM: ASSEMBLY<br />

DISTRICT/ SCHOOL: BRIARCLIFF/BRIARCLIFF HIGH SCHOOL<br />

# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />

# OF STUDENTS: 70 GRADE(S) 9-12<br />

DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 3/4-11/12<br />

NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />

STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />

ARTIST: ROBERT LIPSYTE<br />

CONTRACT #: A7691<br />

TITLE OF PROGRAM: AUTHOR VISIT - THE WRITER'S LIFE<br />

TYPE OF PROGRAM: ASSEMBLY<br />

DISTRICT/ SCHOOL: BREWSTER/HENRY H. WELLS MIDDLE SCHOOL<br />

# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />

# OF STUDENTS: GRADE(S) 8<br />

DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 10/11/11<br />

NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />

STANDARD 1 STANDARD 2 STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />

1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />

1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />

1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />

2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />

3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />

4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />

5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />

6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />

7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />

INVALUABLE EXPERIENCE TO HAVE STUDENTS PLAYING<br />

ALONGSIDE PROFESSIONALS.<br />

8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />

MORE REHEARSAL TIME.<br />

9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />

NONE<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

1.<br />

2.<br />

3.<br />

4.<br />

5.<br />

6.<br />

STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />

ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />

EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />

ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />

TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />

QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />

AS ALWAYS, IT IS A PLEASURE TO HAVE HIM VISIT OUR SCHOOL.<br />

HIS KNOWLEDGE AND EXPERIENCE IS INVALUABLE TO THE<br />

STUDENTS.<br />

8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />

NONE<br />

9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />

NONE<br />

ARTIST: ROBERT ROGERS PUPPET COMPANY CONTRACT #: A8544<br />

TITLE OF PROGRAM: PUPPET WORKSHOP & SHOW<br />

TYPE OF PROGRAM: ASSEMBLY/WORKSHOP<br />

DISTRICT/ SCHOOL:<br />

# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />

PELHAM/PROSPECT HILL ELEM.<br />

# OF STUDENTS: 57 GRADE(S) 2<br />

DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 3/26-30/12<br />

NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />

STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 X STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />

ARTIST: ROBERT SHEPPERSON<br />

CONTRACT #: A8792<br />

TITLE OF PROGRAM: AUTHOR/ILLUSTRATOR VISIT - SANDMAN<br />

TYPE OF PROGRAM: WORKSHOP<br />

DISTRICT/ SCHOOL: NEW ROCHELLE/TRINITY ELEM. SCHOOL<br />

# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />

# OF STUDENTS: 160 GRADE(S) 2<br />

DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 5/30 & 31/12<br />

NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />

STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />

1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />

1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />

1.<br />

2.<br />

3.<br />

4.<br />

5.<br />

6.<br />

STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />

ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />

EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />

ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />

TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />

QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />

THE PROGRAM IS AGE APPROPRIATE. MR. ROGERS HAS AN EASY<br />

GOING, RESPECTFUL MANNER WITH THE CHILDREN.<br />

8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />

NONE<br />

9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />

NONE<br />

1.<br />

2.<br />

3.<br />

4.<br />

5.<br />

6.<br />

STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />

ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />

EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />

ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />

TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />

QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />

HE ENCHANTED STUDENTS WITH HIS BOOKS AND ILLUSTRATIONS.<br />

8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />

NONE<br />

9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />

NONE<br />

Arts in Education Service - School Evaluations <strong>2011</strong>-<strong>2012</strong><br />

Page 272 of 332


ARTIST:<br />

ROBERTA LAWS<br />

CONTRACT #: A8683<br />

TITLE OF PROGRAM: PERFORMANCE PRACTICES OF THE FEMALE<br />

VOCALIST<br />

TYPE OF PROGRAM: WORKSHOP<br />

DISTRICT/ SCHOOL:<br />

NEW ROCHELLE/NEW ROCHELLE HS<br />

# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />

# OF STUDENTS: 50 GRADE(S) 10-12<br />

DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE<br />

4/2-5/12<br />

NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />

STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 X STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />

1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />

1.<br />

2.<br />

3.<br />

4.<br />

5.<br />

6.<br />

STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />

ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />

EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />

ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />

TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />

QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />

MS. LAWS PRESENTED A VARIETY OF VOCAL TECHNIQUES, WARM<br />

UPS AND PERFORMANCE SKILLS TO IMPROVE BREATING AND<br />

PLACEMENT. THE STUDENTS WERE VERY RECEPTIVE AND<br />

ENGAGED.<br />

8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />

NONE<br />

9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />

EXCELLENT.<br />

ARTIST: ROGER POST, JR.<br />

CONTRACT #: A8531<br />

TITLE OF PROGRAM: DRUMMER FOR THE SHOW - ONCE UPON A<br />

MATTRESS<br />

TYPE OF PROGRAM: ASSEMBLY<br />

DISTRICT/ SCHOOL:<br />

SOMERS/SOMERS HIGH SCHOOL<br />

# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />

# OF STUDENTS: GRADE(S) 9-12<br />

DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE<br />

3/12-18/12<br />

NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />

STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />

1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />

ARTIST: ROCHEL GARNER COLEMAN<br />

CONTRACT #: A7579<br />

TITLE OF PROGRAM: MARTIN LUTHER KING AMAZING GRACE SHOW<br />

TYPE OF PROGRAM: ASSEMBLY<br />

DISTRICT/ SCHOOL:<br />

BYRAM HILLS/H.C. CRITTENDEN MIDDLE SCHOOL<br />

# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />

# OF STUDENTS: 650 GRADE(S) 6-8<br />

DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 1/18/12<br />

NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />

STANDARD 1 STANDARD 2 STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4 X<br />

1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />

1.<br />

2.<br />

3.<br />

4.<br />

5.<br />

6.<br />

STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />

ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />

EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />

ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />

TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />

QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

N/<br />

7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />

THIS SHOW WAS SO INFORMATIVE. THE CHILDREN WERE TOTALLY<br />

ENGAGED. THEY LOVED THE MUSIC AND REALLY CONNECTED<br />

WITH THE PERFORMERS.<br />

8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />

NONE<br />

9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />

ARTIST:<br />

GREAT SHOW.<br />

ROGER POST, JR.<br />

TITLE OF PROGRAM: DRUMMER FOR THE SHOW - XANADU<br />

TYPE OF PROGRAM: ASSEMBLY<br />

DISTRICT/ SCHOOL:<br />

CONTRACT #: A8774<br />

CHAPPAQUA/HORACE GREELEY HIGH SCHOOL<br />

# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />

# OF STUDENTS: 200 GRADE(S) 12<br />

DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 4/16-21/12<br />

NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />

STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />

1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />

1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />

2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />

3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />

4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />

5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />

6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />

7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />

NONE<br />

8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />

NONE<br />

9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />

NONE<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

1.<br />

2.<br />

3.<br />

4.<br />

5.<br />

6.<br />

STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />

ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />

EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />

ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />

TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />

QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />

IMPORTANT FOR THE STUDENTS TO LEARN AND SEE HOW ALL THE<br />

COMPONENTS OF A MUSICAL SHOW COME TOGETHER.<br />

8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />

NONE<br />

9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />

NONE<br />

Arts in Education Service - School Evaluations <strong>2011</strong>-<strong>2012</strong><br />

Page 273 of 332


ARTIST: RONALD ROTHENBERG<br />

CONTRACT #: A8433<br />

TITLE OF PROGRAM: DRUMMER FOR THE SHOW - THE DROWSY<br />

CHAPERONE<br />

TYPE OF PROGRAM: ASSEMBLY<br />

DISTRICT/ SCHOOL: KATONAH/LEWISBORO/JOHN JAY MIDDLE SCHOOL<br />

# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />

# OF STUDENTS: 75 GRADE(S) 6-8<br />

DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 3/3-17/12<br />

NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />

STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />

1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />

ARTIST: RONI SCHOTTER<br />

CONTRACT #: A8136<br />

TITLE OF PROGRAM: AUTHOR VISIT<br />

TYPE OF PROGRAM: ASSEMBLY/WORKSHOP<br />

DISTRICT/ SCHOOL: CHAPPAQUA/WESTORCHARD ELEM.<br />

# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />

# OF STUDENTS: 96 GRADE(S) 3<br />

DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 5/2/12<br />

NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />

STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />

1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />

1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />

2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />

3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />

4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />

5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />

6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />

7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />

THE PIT ORCHESTRA WAS AWESOME.<br />

8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />

NONE<br />

9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />

NONE<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />

2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />

3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />

4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />

5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />

6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />

7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />

WE LOVE RONI.<br />

8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />

NONE<br />

9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />

NONE<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

ARTIST: RONI SCHOTTER<br />

CONTRACT #: A7606<br />

TITLE OF PROGRAM: AUTHOR VISIT<br />

TYPE OF PROGRAM: WORKSHOP<br />

DISTRICT/ SCHOOL: HENDRICK HUDSON/FURNACE WOODS ELEM.<br />

# OF TEACHERS: 3<br />

# OF STUDENTS: 57 GRADE(S) 2<br />

DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 12/7/11<br />

NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />

STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />

ARTIST: RONI SCHOTTER<br />

CONTRACT #: A8143<br />

TITLE OF PROGRAM: AUTHOR VISIT<br />

TYPE OF PROGRAM: ASSEMBLY<br />

DISTRICT/ SCHOOL: POCANTICO HILLS/POCANTICO HILLS CENTRAL SCHO<br />

# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />

# OF STUDENTS: 150 GRADE(S) K-4<br />

DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 12/9/11<br />

NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />

STANDARD 1 STANDARD 2 STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />

1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />

1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />

1.<br />

2.<br />

3.<br />

4.<br />

5.<br />

6.<br />

STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />

ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />

EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />

ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />

TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />

QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />

RONI IS THE BEST EXAMPLE OF WRITING PROCESS IN ACTION. SHE<br />

SHARES HER PERSONAL EXPERIENCES IN WRITING THROUGH THE<br />

VARIOUS STEPS, AND INSPIRES YOUNG WRITERS.<br />

8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />

NONE<br />

9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />

WE LOVE RONI.<br />

1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />

2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />

3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />

4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />

5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />

6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />

7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />

RONI DID A WONDERFUL JOB PRESENTING AND SPEAKING WITH<br />

ALL OF OUR STUDENTS.<br />

8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />

NONE<br />

9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />

WE LOOK FORWARD TO INVITING HER BACK.<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

Arts in Education Service - School Evaluations <strong>2011</strong>-<strong>2012</strong><br />

Page 274 of 332


ARTIST: ROSS KAUFMAN dba RED LIGHT FILMS CONTRACT #: A8391<br />

TITLE OF PROGRAM: FILM MAKER<br />

TYPE OF PROGRAM: ASSEMBLY<br />

DISTRICT/ SCHOOL: KATONAH/LEWISBORO/JOHN JAY HIGH SCHOOL<br />

# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />

# OF STUDENTS: 30 GRADE(S) 10-12<br />

DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 4/2/12<br />

NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />

STANDARD 1 STANDARD 2 STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />

ARTIST: ROZ SCHANZER<br />

CONTRACT #: A8419<br />

TITLE OF PROGRAM: AUTHOR/ILLUSTRATOR VISIT<br />

TYPE OF PROGRAM: WORKSHOP<br />

DISTRICT/ SCHOOL: POCANTICO HILLS/POCANTICO HILLS CENTRAL SCHO<br />

# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />

# OF STUDENTS: 30 GRADE(S) 5<br />

DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 1/20/12<br />

NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />

STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />

1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />

1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />

1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />

2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />

3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />

4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />

5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />

6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />

7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />

ROSS WAS AN EXCELLENT PRESENTER AND WE LOOKED<br />

FORWARD TO HAVING HIM VISIT. THE STUDENTS AND STAFF<br />

UNANIMOUSLY AGREED HE WAS INSPIRING AND INFORMATIVE.<br />

8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />

NONE<br />

9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />

WE ARE SO GRATEFUL TO HAVE HAD THIS OPPORTUNITY.<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

1.<br />

2.<br />

3.<br />

4.<br />

5.<br />

6.<br />

STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />

ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />

EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />

ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />

TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />

QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />

5<br />

4<br />

5<br />

5<br />

4<br />

4<br />

7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />

ROZ DID A TERRIFIC JOB SHARING HER EXPERTISE ON THE LEWIS<br />

AND CLARK EXPEDITION. SHE HAD MANY INTERESTING STORIES<br />

TO SHARE ABOUT HER RESEARCH AND ARTWORK FOR THE BOOK.<br />

8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />

NONE<br />

9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />

WE WILL TRY TO INVITE HER TO OUR SCHOOL AGAIN. IT WAS VERY<br />

WORTHWHILE.<br />

ARTIST: RUTH E. MATTHEWS<br />

CONTRACT #: A8864<br />

TITLE OF PROGRAM: ACCOMPANIST FOR CHORAL SHOW<br />

TYPE OF PROGRAM: ASSEMBLY<br />

DISTRICT/ SCHOOL:<br />

# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />

WHITE PLAINS/EASTVIEW MS<br />

# OF STUDENTS: 60 GRADE(S) 6<br />

DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 5/23/12<br />

NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />

STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />

1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />

ARTIST: RYAN BUECKE<br />

CONTRACT #: A8651<br />

TITLE OF PROGRAM: TROMBONE PLAYER FOR THE SHOW - A FUNNY<br />

THING HAPPENED ON THE WAY TO THE FORUM<br />

TYPE OF PROGRAM: ASSEMBLY<br />

DISTRICT/ SCHOOL: PUTNAM VALLEY/PUTNAM VALLEY HIGH SCHOOL<br />

# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />

# OF STUDENTS: 400 GRADE(S) 9-12<br />

DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 4/13-23/12<br />

NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />

STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />

1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />

1.<br />

2.<br />

3.<br />

4.<br />

5.<br />

6.<br />

STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />

ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />

EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />

ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />

TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />

QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />

ALL SCHOOL CHOIRS SHOULD HAVE AN ACCOMPANIST THAT IS AS<br />

SKILLED AS RUTH.<br />

8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />

NONE<br />

9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />

NONE<br />

1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />

2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />

3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />

4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />

5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />

6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />

7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />

NONE<br />

8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />

NONE<br />

9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />

NONE<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

Arts in Education Service - School Evaluations <strong>2011</strong>-<strong>2012</strong><br />

Page 275 of 332


ARTIST: RYAN MOLLER<br />

CONTRACT #: A8352A<br />

TITLE OF PROGRAM: COSTUME DESIGNER FOR SENIOR MUSICAL -<br />

XANADU<br />

TYPE OF PROGRAM: RESIDENCY<br />

DISTRICT/ SCHOOL: CHAPPAQUA/HORACE GREELEY HIGH SCHOOL<br />

# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />

# OF STUDENTS: 200 GRADE(S) 12<br />

DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 2/1-3/8/12<br />

NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />

STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 X STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />

ARTIST: RYAN MOLLER<br />

CONTRACT #: A8352B<br />

TITLE OF PROGRAM: COSTUME DESIGNER FOR SENIOR MUSICAL -<br />

XANADU<br />

TYPE OF PROGRAM: RESIDENCY<br />

DISTRICT/ SCHOOL: CHAPPAQUA/HORACE GREELEY HIGH SCHOOL<br />

# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />

# OF STUDENTS: 200 GRADE(S) 12<br />

DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 3/9-4/21/12<br />

NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />

STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 X STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />

1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />

1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />

1.<br />

2.<br />

3.<br />

4.<br />

5.<br />

6.<br />

STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />

ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />

EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />

ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />

TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />

QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />

THE PROCESS OF COSTUME DESIGN AND CREATION IS A CRITICAL<br />

COMPONENT IN MOUNTING A PRODUCTION.<br />

8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />

NONE<br />

9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />

IT HAS THUS FAR BEEN A PLEASURE WORKING WITH RYAN ON<br />

THIS PART OF THE PRODUCTION.<br />

ARTIST: RYAN ODELL<br />

CONTRACT #: A8068<br />

TITLE OF PROGRAM: PERCUSSION PLAYER FOR THE SHOW - BARNUM<br />

TYPE OF PROGRAM: ASSEMBLY<br />

DISTRICT/ SCHOOL:<br />

NORTH SALEM/NORTH SALEM MS & HS<br />

# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />

# OF STUDENTS: 200 GRADE(S) 6-12<br />

DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE<br />

2/4-12/12<br />

NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />

STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />

1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />

2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />

3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />

4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />

5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />

6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />

7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />

IMPORTANT FOR STUDENTS TO SEE AND LEARN HOW ALL THE<br />

COMPONENTS INCLUDING THE DESIGN AND CREATION OF<br />

COSTUMES COME TOGETHER.<br />

8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />

NONE<br />

9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />

RYAN WAS ENGAGING WITH THE STUDENTS AND INTERESTED IN<br />

THEIR FEEDBACK REGARDING THE DESIGN AND CREATION OF<br />

COSTUMES AND HE WORKED COOPERATIVELY WITH THEM.<br />

ARTIST: SABRINA DOOLITTLE<br />

CONTRACT #: A7889<br />

TITLE OF PROGRAM: TECHNICAL DIRECTOR / THEATRE SKILLS<br />

TYPE OF PROGRAM: RESIDENCY<br />

DISTRICT/ SCHOOL: WHITE PLAINS/WHITE PLAINS HIGH SCHOOL<br />

# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />

# OF STUDENTS: 20 GRADE(S) 9-12<br />

DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 10/24-11/18/11<br />

NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />

STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 X STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />

1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />

1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />

2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />

3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />

4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />

5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />

6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />

7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />

RYAN IS AN INCREDIBLE MUSICIAN. STUDENTS RESPONDED<br />

ENGERLY TO HIS PLAYING.<br />

8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />

NONE<br />

9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />

NONE<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

1.<br />

2.<br />

3.<br />

4.<br />

5.<br />

6.<br />

STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />

ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />

EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />

ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />

TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />

QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />

SABRINA WORKS WELL WITH STUDENTS AND MAINTAINS POSITIVE<br />

RELATIONSHIPS WITH THEM. SHE MAKES HERSELF AVAILABLE AT<br />

ANY TIME TO HELP WITH THE TECHNICAL ASPECTS OF OUR<br />

PROGRAM.<br />

8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />

NONE<br />

9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />

STUDENTS LOVE WORKING ON A STAGE CREW UNDER HER<br />

DIRECTION AND SUPERVISION.<br />

Arts in Education Service - School Evaluations <strong>2011</strong>-<strong>2012</strong><br />

Page 276 of 332


ARTIST: SACRED DRUMS PRODUCTION<br />

CONTRACT #: A8415<br />

TITLE OF PROGRAM: SEAN CLEMENTS - AFRICAN DRUMS & DANCE<br />

TYPE OF PROGRAM: ASSEMBLY<br />

DISTRICT/ SCHOOL: NEW ROCHELLE/JEFFERSON ELEM.<br />

# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />

# OF STUDENTS: 621 GRADE(S) K-5<br />

DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 2/9/12<br />

NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />

STANDARD 1 STANDARD 2 STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4 X<br />

ARTIST: SADECKY'S PUPPETS<br />

CONTRACT #: A8013<br />

TITLE OF PROGRAM: CAROUSEL PUPPET SHOW<br />

TYPE OF PROGRAM: ASSEMBLY<br />

DISTRICT/ SCHOOL: NEW ROCHELLE/COLUMBUS ELEM.<br />

# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />

# OF STUDENTS: GRADE(S) K-5<br />

DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 12/12/11<br />

NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />

STANDARD 1 STANDARD 2 STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />

1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />

1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />

1.<br />

2.<br />

3.<br />

4.<br />

5.<br />

6.<br />

STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />

ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />

EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />

ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />

TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />

QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />

FANTASTIC ASSEMBLY. THE ENTIRE HOUR WAS INTERACTIVE AND<br />

ALL STUDENTS PARTICIPATED ENTHUSIASTICALLY.<br />

8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />

NONE<br />

9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />

WE LOVE BROTHER SEAN.<br />

1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />

2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />

3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />

4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />

5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />

6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />

7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />

NONE<br />

8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />

NONE<br />

9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />

NONE<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

ARTIST: SALLY COCHRAN<br />

CONTRACT #: A8252<br />

TITLE OF PROGRAM: COSTOME DESIGNER FOR THE SHOW - FOR<br />

LYSISTRATA<br />

TYPE OF PROGRAM: RESIDENCY<br />

DISTRICT/ SCHOOL: CHAPPAQUA/HORACE GREELEY HIGH SCHOOL<br />

# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />

# OF STUDENTS: 20 GRADE(S) 9-12<br />

DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 1/16-19/12<br />

NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />

STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 X STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />

ARTIST: SALLY COCHRAN<br />

CONTRACT #: A7531<br />

TITLE OF PROGRAM: COSTOME DESIGNER FOR THE SHOW - THE<br />

DROWSY CHAPERONE<br />

TYPE OF PROGRAM: RESIDENCY<br />

DISTRICT/ SCHOOL: CHAPPAQUA/HORACE GREELEY HIGH SCHOOL<br />

# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />

# OF STUDENTS: 27 GRADE(S) 9-12<br />

DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 9/12-11/19/11<br />

NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />

STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 X STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />

1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />

1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />

1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />

2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />

3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />

4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />

5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />

6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />

7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />

SALLY IS A GIFTED DESIGNER AND GREAT WITH THE STUDENTS.<br />

8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />

NONE<br />

9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />

I ALWAYS LOOK FORWARD TO WORKING WITH HER.<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />

2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />

3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />

4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />

5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />

6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />

7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />

SALLY OUTDID HERSELF THIS TIME. GREAT JOB.<br />

8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />

NONE<br />

9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />

I LOOK FORWARD TO WORKING WITH SALLY AGAIN.<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

Arts in Education Service - School Evaluations <strong>2011</strong>-<strong>2012</strong><br />

Page 277 of 332


ARTIST: SALLY COCHRAN<br />

CONTRACT #: A8762<br />

TITLE OF PROGRAM: COSTUME DESIGNER FOR THE SHOW - OUR TOWN<br />

TYPE OF PROGRAM: RESIDENCY<br />

DISTRICT/ SCHOOL: CHAPPAQUA/HORACE GREELEY HIGH SCHOOL<br />

# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />

# OF STUDENTS: 20 GRADE(S) 9-12<br />

DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 4/23-5/5/12<br />

NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />

STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 X STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />

1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />

ARTIST: SALLY COCHRAN<br />

CONTRACT #: A8380<br />

TITLE OF PROGRAM: COSTUMER DESIGNER FOR THE SHOW - SIX<br />

DEGREES OF SEPARATION<br />

TYPE OF PROGRAM: RESIDENCY<br />

DISTRICT/ SCHOOL: CHAPPAQUA/HORACE GREELEY HIGH SCHOOL<br />

# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />

# OF STUDENTS: 19 GRADE(S) 9-12<br />

DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 2/11-3/12/12<br />

NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />

STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 X STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4 X<br />

1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />

1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />

2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />

3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />

4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />

5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />

6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />

7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />

SALLY IS A GREAT DESIGNER AND WORKS WELL WITH THE<br />

STUDENTS.<br />

8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />

NONE<br />

9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />

I LOOK FORWARD TO WORKING WITH SALLY AGAIN NEXT YEAR.<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />

2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />

3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />

4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />

5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />

6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />

7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />

SALLY IS A GREAT DESIGNER AND WORKS WELL WITH THE<br />

STUDENTS.<br />

8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />

NOEN<br />

9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />

I LOOK FORWARD TO WORKING WITH HER AGAIN.<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

ARTIST: SAMUEL LADLEY<br />

CONTRACT #: A8123<br />

TITLE OF PROGRAM: COLONIAL LIFE & ARTIFACTS<br />

TYPE OF PROGRAM: ASSEMBLY<br />

DISTRICT/ SCHOOL: LAKELAND/THOMAS JEFFERSON ELEM.<br />

# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />

# OF STUDENTS: 75 GRADE(S) 4<br />

DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 3/16/12<br />

NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />

STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 X STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4 X<br />

1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />

ARTIST: SANDRA COFFIN<br />

CONTRACT #: A8512<br />

TITLE OF PROGRAM: TRUMPET PLAYER FOR THE SHOW - BEAUTY AND<br />

THE BEAST<br />

TYPE OF PROGRAM: ASSEMBLY<br />

DISTRICT/ SCHOOL: PLEASANTVILLE/PLEASANTVILLE HIGH SCHOOL<br />

# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />

# OF STUDENTS: 400 GRADE(S) 9-12<br />

DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 3/9-17/12<br />

NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />

STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />

1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />

1.<br />

2.<br />

3.<br />

4.<br />

5.<br />

6.<br />

STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />

ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />

EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />

ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />

TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />

QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />

HE PRESENTED HIS USUAL OUTSTANDING PROGRAM. STUDENTS<br />

WERE INTERESTED, ENGAGED, AND LEARNING THROUGH THE USE<br />

OF ARTIFACTS AND A WORKSHOP WAS A GREAT COLONIAL<br />

EXPERIENCE.<br />

8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />

NONE<br />

9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />

NONE<br />

1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />

2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />

3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />

4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />

5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />

6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />

7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />

HIGH, PROFESSIONAL MUSIC QUALITY.<br />

8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />

NONE<br />

9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />

CONSISTENT, DEPENDABLE SERIVCE PROVIDED.<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

N/<br />

5<br />

N/<br />

Arts in Education Service - School Evaluations <strong>2011</strong>-<strong>2012</strong><br />

Page 278 of 332


ARTIST: SANKOFA DRUM & DANCE TROUP CONTRACT #: A8425B<br />

TITLE OF PROGRAM: KOFI & SANKOFA DRUMMING & DANCING SHOW<br />

TYPE OF PROGRAM: ASSEMBLY/WORKSHOP<br />

DISTRICT/ SCHOOL: LAKELAND/THOMAS JEFFERSON ELEM.<br />

# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />

# OF STUDENTS: GRADE(S) K-5<br />

DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 6/5 & 7/12<br />

NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />

STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 X STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4 X<br />

ARTIST: SANKOFA DRUM & DANCE TROUP CONTRACT #: A8425A<br />

TITLE OF PROGRAM: KOFI & SANKOFA DRUMMING & DANCING SHOW<br />

TYPE OF PROGRAM: ASSEMBLY<br />

DISTRICT/ SCHOOL: LAKELAND/THOMAS JEFFERSON ELEM.<br />

# OF TEACHERS: 4<br />

# OF STUDENTS: 425 GRADE(S) K-5<br />

DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 2/3/12<br />

NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />

STANDARD 1 STANDARD 2 STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4 X<br />

1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />

1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />

1.<br />

2.<br />

3.<br />

4.<br />

5.<br />

6.<br />

STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />

ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />

EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />

ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />

TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />

QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />

THEY KEEPS THE CHILDREN ENGAGED AND WANTING MORE. THEY<br />

SHARED MUCH INFORMATION ABOUT THE CULTURE, MUSIC AND<br />

ART OF AFRICA.<br />

8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />

NONE<br />

9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />

NONE<br />

1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />

2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />

3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />

4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />

5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />

6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />

7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />

IT'S A GOOD MULTI CULTURAL PROGRAM. ENGAGES THE<br />

STUDENTS AND THEY ARE ALLOWED TO PARTICIPATE WITH<br />

SINGING AND MOVEMENT.<br />

8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />

NONE<br />

9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />

WELL DONE. THE TEACHERS AND STUDENTS COULD HAVE<br />

STAYED LONGER THEY WERE SO ENGAGED.<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

ARTIST: SARAH BRETT ENGLAND<br />

CONTRACT #: A8117<br />

TITLE OF PROGRAM: MUSICAL DIRECTOR FOR THE SHOW - FOOTLOOSE<br />

TYPE OF PROGRAM: RESIDENCY<br />

DISTRICT/ SCHOOL: CHAPPAQUA/BELL MIDDLE SCHOOL<br />

# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />

# OF STUDENTS: GRADE(S) 5-8<br />

DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 1/25-3/27/12<br />

NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />

STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 X STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />

ARTIST: SARAH BRETT ENGLAND<br />

CONTRACT #: A8675<br />

TITLE OF PROGRAM: MUSICAL DIRECTOR FOR THE SHOW - PETER PAN<br />

TYPE OF PROGRAM: RESIDENCY<br />

DISTRICT/ SCHOOL: CHAPPAQUA/ROARING BROOK ELEM.<br />

# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />

# OF STUDENTS: 113 GRADE(S) 2-4<br />

DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 3/28-6/3/12<br />

NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />

STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 X STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />

1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />

1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />

1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />

2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />

3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />

4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />

5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />

6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />

7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />

IT'S AN AMAZING PROGRAM. THEY NOT ONLY LEARNED THE<br />

LYRICS BUT THE MEANINGS BEHIND THE WORDS AS WELL.<br />

8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />

NONE<br />

9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />

NONE<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

N/<br />

1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />

2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />

3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />

4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />

5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />

6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />

7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />

NONE<br />

8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />

NONE<br />

9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />

SARAH WAS GREAT WITH THE CHILDREN. SHE WENT OUT OF HER<br />

WAY TO HELP.<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

N/<br />

Arts in Education Service - School Evaluations <strong>2011</strong>-<strong>2012</strong><br />

Page 279 of 332


ARTIST: SARAH E. KNAPP<br />

CONTRACT #: A8822<br />

TITLE OF PROGRAM: SONGWRITING PERFORMANCE<br />

TYPE OF PROGRAM: ASSEMBLY<br />

DISTRICT/ SCHOOL: PUTNAM VALLEY/PUTNAM VALLEY ELEM.<br />

# OF TEACHERS: 3<br />

# OF STUDENTS: 150 GRADE(S) 4<br />

DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 6/20/12<br />

NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />

STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />

ARTIST: SARAH E. KNAPP<br />

CONTRACT #: A8213<br />

TITLE OF PROGRAM: SONGWRITING WORKSHOP<br />

TYPE OF PROGRAM: WORKSHOP<br />

DISTRICT/ SCHOOL: PUTNAM VALLEY/PUTNAM VALLEY MIDDLE SCHOOL<br />

# OF TEACHERS: 3<br />

# OF STUDENTS: 100 GRADE(S) 8<br />

DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 1/17-27/12<br />

NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />

STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />

1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />

1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />

1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />

2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />

3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />

4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />

5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />

6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />

7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />

THE CHILDREN LEARN SO MUCH. THE PERFORMANCE WAS<br />

AMAZING.<br />

8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />

NONE<br />

9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />

NONE<br />

4<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

4<br />

N/<br />

1.<br />

2.<br />

3.<br />

4.<br />

5.<br />

6.<br />

STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />

ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />

EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />

ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />

TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />

QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />

3<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />

SARAH IS AN AMAZING WRITER. SHE IS ABLE TO CONNECT WITH<br />

THE STUDENTS.<br />

8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />

NONE<br />

9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />

THIS PROGRAM WAS HARD AS THERE WERE SOME STUDENTS WHO<br />

HAD NO DESIRE TO REALLY BE IN MUSIC CLASS.<br />

ARTIST: SARAH E. KNAPP<br />

CONTRACT #: A8635<br />

TITLE OF PROGRAM: SONGWRITING WORKSHOP<br />

TYPE OF PROGRAM: WORKSHOP<br />

DISTRICT/ SCHOOL: PUTNAM VALLEY/PUTNAM VALLEY ELEM.<br />

# OF TEACHERS: 4<br />

# OF STUDENTS: 125 GRADE(S) 4<br />

DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 3/19/12<br />

NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />

STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />

ARTIST: SCOTT HICKEY<br />

CONTRACT #: A7680<br />

TITLE OF PROGRAM: DIRECTOR FOR THE FALL SHOW<br />

TYPE OF PROGRAM: RESIDENCY<br />

DISTRICT/ SCHOOL: KATONAH/LEWISBORO/JOHN JAY HIGH SCHOOL<br />

# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />

# OF STUDENTS: 400 GRADE(S) 9-12<br />

DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 10/1-11/20/11<br />

NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />

STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 X STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />

1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />

1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />

1.<br />

2.<br />

3.<br />

4.<br />

5.<br />

6.<br />

STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />

ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />

EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />

ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />

TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />

QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />

IT INCREASES STUDENT INVOLVEMENT AND OWNERSHIP OF WHAT<br />

THEY DO. IT IS A TREMENDOUS OPPORTUNITY FOR OUR STUDENTS<br />

TO PUT THEIR THOUGHTS INTO SONG.<br />

8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />

NONE<br />

9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />

ESPECIALLY NICE THAT THE ARTIST COMES BACK TO HELP THE<br />

CHILDREN PERFORM THE SONG AT THEIR MOVING UP CEREMONY.<br />

1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />

2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />

3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />

4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />

5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />

6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />

7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />

NONE<br />

8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />

NONE<br />

9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />

NONE<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

Arts in Education Service - School Evaluations <strong>2011</strong>-<strong>2012</strong><br />

Page 280 of 332


ARTIST: SCOTT HICKEY<br />

CONTRACT #: A8805<br />

TITLE OF PROGRAM: THEATRE DESIGNER FOR THE ONE ACT PLAY<br />

FESTIVAL<br />

TYPE OF PROGRAM: RESIDENCY<br />

DISTRICT/ SCHOOL: KATONAH/LEWISBORO/JOHN JAY HIGH SCHOOL<br />

# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />

# OF STUDENTS: 100 GRADE(S) 9-12<br />

DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 4/30-5/4/12<br />

NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />

STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 X STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />

1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />

ARTIST: SCOTT HICKEY<br />

CONTRACT #: A8308<br />

TITLE OF PROGRAM: THEATRE DESIGNER FOR THE SHOW - GUYS &<br />

TYPE OF PROGRAM: WORKSHOP<br />

DISTRICT/ SCHOOL: KATONAH/LEWISBORO/JOHN JAY HIGH SCHOOL<br />

# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />

# OF STUDENTS: 50 GRADE(S) 9-12<br />

DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 2/1-3/22/12<br />

NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />

STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 X STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />

1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />

1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />

2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />

3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />

4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />

5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />

6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />

7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />

SCOTT IS AN EXCEPTIONALLY EFFECTIVE TEACHER. HIS<br />

EXPERTISE IS MATCHED BY THE CLARITY OF HIS EXPRESSION.<br />

STUDENTS RESPOND TO HIM ENTHUSIASTICALLY.<br />

8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />

NONE<br />

9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />

NONE<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />

2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />

3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />

4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />

5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />

6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />

7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />

NONE<br />

8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />

NONE<br />

9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />

NONE<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

ARTIST: SCOTT HICKEY<br />

CONTRACT #: A8837<br />

TITLE OF PROGRAM: THEATRE DESIGNER FOR THE SPRING CONCERT<br />

TYPE OF PROGRAM: WORKSHOP<br />

DISTRICT/ SCHOOL: KATONAH/LEWISBORO/JOHN JAY HIGH SCHOOL<br />

# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />

# OF STUDENTS: 450 GRADE(S) 9-12<br />

DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 5/23-6/4/12<br />

NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />

STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 X STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />

ARTIST: SCOTT RIMM-HEWITT<br />

CONTRACT #: A8067<br />

TITLE OF PROGRAM: TUBA & BASS PLAYER FOR THE SHOW - BARNUM<br />

TYPE OF PROGRAM: ASSEMBLY<br />

DISTRICT/ SCHOOL: NORTH SALEM/NORTH SALEM MS & HS<br />

# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />

# OF STUDENTS: 200 GRADE(S) 6-12<br />

DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 2/4-12/12<br />

NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />

STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />

1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />

1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />

1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />

2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />

3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />

4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />

5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />

6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />

7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />

NONE<br />

8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />

NONE<br />

9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />

NONE<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

1.<br />

2.<br />

3.<br />

4.<br />

5.<br />

6.<br />

STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />

ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />

EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />

ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />

TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />

QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />

MR. RIMM IS AN INCREDIBLE MUSICIAN AND A GREAT ROLE MODEL<br />

FOR THE STUDENTS.<br />

8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />

NONE<br />

9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />

NONE<br />

Arts in Education Service - School Evaluations <strong>2011</strong>-<strong>2012</strong><br />

Page 281 of 332


ARTIST: SEBASTIAN ADAMO<br />

CONTRACT #: A7685<br />

TITLE OF PROGRAM: LIGHTING DESIGNER FOR THE FALL SHOW<br />

TYPE OF PROGRAM: RESIDENCY<br />

DISTRICT/ SCHOOL: KATONAH/LEWISBORO/JOHN JAY HIGH SCHOOL<br />

# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />

# OF STUDENTS: 400 GRADE(S) 9-12<br />

DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 10/28-11/24/11<br />

NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />

STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 X STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />

1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />

ARTIST: SERGEY NAZAROV<br />

CONTRACT #: A8561<br />

TITLE OF PROGRAM: VIOLIN PLAYER FOR THE SHOW - BEAUTY AND THE<br />

BEAST<br />

TYPE OF PROGRAM: ASSEMBLY<br />

DISTRICT/ SCHOOL: PLEASANTVILLE/PLEASANTVILLE HIGH SCHOOL<br />

# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />

# OF STUDENTS: 400 GRADE(S) 9-12<br />

DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 3/9-17/12<br />

NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />

STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 STANDARD 3 STANDARD 4<br />

1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />

1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />

2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />

3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />

4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />

5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />

6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />

7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />

NONE<br />

8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />

NONE<br />

9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />

NONE<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />

2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />

3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />

4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />

5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />

6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />

7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />

THIS HELPED OUR MUSICAL THEATRE PROGRAM.<br />

8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />

ALWAYS NICE WHEN ARTIST CAN PLAY ALL PERFORMANCES.<br />

9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />

NONE<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

N/<br />

ARTIST: SHAKESPEARE THEATRE OF NJ - NJ SH<br />

CONTRACT #: A7582<br />

TITLE OF PROGRAM: A MIDSUMMER NIGHT'S DREAM<br />

TYPE OF PROGRAM: ASSEMBLY<br />

DISTRICT/ SCHOOL: BYRAM HILLS/H.C. CRITTENDEN MIDDLE SCHOOL<br />

# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />

# OF STUDENTS: 200 GRADE(S) 8<br />

DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 5/29/12<br />

NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />

STANDARD 1 STANDARD 2 STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4 X<br />

ARTIST: SHANE O'REILLY<br />

CONTRACT #: A8569A<br />

TITLE OF PROGRAM: LEARNING THE GUITAR<br />

TYPE OF PROGRAM: WORKSHOP<br />

DISTRICT/ SCHOOL: KATONAH/LEWISBORO/MEADOWPOND ELEM.<br />

# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />

# OF STUDENTS: 9 GRADE(S) K-2<br />

DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 4/9-6/4/12<br />

NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />

STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 X STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />

1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />

1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />

1.<br />

2.<br />

3.<br />

4.<br />

5.<br />

6.<br />

STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />

ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />

EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />

ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />

TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />

QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

N/<br />

7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />

CAST IS YOUNG. PRODUCTION IS COOL AND CHILDREN RELATED<br />

WELL TO BOTH.<br />

8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />

NONE<br />

9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />

DIRECTLY CORRESPONDS TO CURRICULUM. CHILDREN ENGAGED<br />

AND REALLY ENJOYED IT.<br />

1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />

2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />

3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />

4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />

5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />

6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />

7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />

THE STUDENTS LOVE THIS PROGRAM.<br />

8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />

NONE<br />

9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />

NONE<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

Arts in Education Service - School Evaluations <strong>2011</strong>-<strong>2012</strong><br />

Page 282 of 332


ARTIST: SHANE O'REILLY<br />

CONTRACT #: A8569B<br />

TITLE OF PROGRAM: LEARNING THE GUITAR<br />

TYPE OF PROGRAM: WORKSHOP<br />

DISTRICT/ SCHOOL: KATONAH/LEWISBORO/MEADOWPOND ELEM.<br />

# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />

# OF STUDENTS: 6 GRADE(S) 3-5<br />

DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 4/11-5/30/12<br />

NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />

STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 X STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />

ARTIST: SHANE O'REILLY<br />

CONTRACT #: A8295<br />

TITLE OF PROGRAM: LEARNING THE GUITAR<br />

TYPE OF PROGRAM: WORKSHOP<br />

DISTRICT/ SCHOOL: KATONAH/LEWISBORO/MEADOWPOND ELEM.<br />

# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />

# OF STUDENTS: 70 GRADE(S) 3-5<br />

DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 1/9-3/26/12<br />

NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />

STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 X STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />

1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />

1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />

1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />

2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />

3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />

4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />

5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />

6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />

7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />

THE STUDENTS LOVED HIM AND HIS LESSONS.<br />

8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />

NONE<br />

9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />

NONE<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

1.<br />

2.<br />

3.<br />

4.<br />

5.<br />

6.<br />

STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />

ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />

EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />

ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />

TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />

QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />

SHANE IS VERY RESPONSIBLE EASY TO WORK WITH AND GREAT<br />

WITH THE STUDENTS. EVERYONE SIGNED UP FOR A SECOND<br />

SESSION AND MOST EVEN A THIRD.<br />

8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />

NONE<br />

9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />

NONE<br />

ARTIST: SHARI CARANANTE<br />

CONTRACT #: A8629<br />

TITLE OF PROGRAM: ARTS & CRAFTS / MAGICALLY MOSAIC<br />

TYPE OF PROGRAM: WORKSHOP<br />

DISTRICT/ SCHOOL: EASTCHESTER/WAVERLY EARLY CHILDHOOD CTR<br />

# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />

# OF STUDENTS: 9 GRADE(S) 1<br />

DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 3/14-5/9/12<br />

NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />

STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 X STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />

1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />

ARTIST: SHARI CARANANTE<br />

CONTRACT #: A7748<br />

TITLE OF PROGRAM: BIZZI BEES EXPLORING ME - CREATING A<br />

STORYBOOK<br />

TYPE OF PROGRAM: WORKSHOP<br />

DISTRICT/ SCHOOL: EASTCHESTER/WAVERLY EARLY CHILDHOOD CTR<br />

# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />

# OF STUDENTS: 8 GRADE(S) 1<br />

DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 10/14-12/16/11<br />

NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />

STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 X STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />

1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />

1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />

2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />

3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />

4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />

5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />

6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />

7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />

NONE<br />

8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />

NONE<br />

9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />

NONE<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

1.<br />

2.<br />

3.<br />

4.<br />

5.<br />

6.<br />

STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />

ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />

EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />

ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />

TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />

QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />

SHARI WAS HANDS ON AND LOVED WHAT SHE DID. SHE MADE THE<br />

CLASS FUN AND INTERESTING.<br />

8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />

NONE<br />

9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />

WE WOULD HAVE SHARI COME BACK AGAIN.<br />

Arts in Education Service - School Evaluations <strong>2011</strong>-<strong>2012</strong><br />

Page 283 of 332


ARTIST: SHARI CARANANTE<br />

CONTRACT #: A7660<br />

TITLE OF PROGRAM: FASHION DESIGNS<br />

TYPE OF PROGRAM: WORKSHOP<br />

DISTRICT/ SCHOOL: EASTCHESTER/GREENVALE ELEM.<br />

# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />

# OF STUDENTS: 13 GRADE(S) 2 & 3<br />

DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 10/19-12/14/11<br />

NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />

STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 X STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />

ARTIST: SHARI CARANANTE<br />

CONTRACT #: A8603<br />

TITLE OF PROGRAM: MOSAIC CREATIONS<br />

TYPE OF PROGRAM: WORKSHOP<br />

DISTRICT/ SCHOOL: EASTCHESTER/GREENVALE ELEM.<br />

# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />

# OF STUDENTS: 9 GRADE(S) 3-5<br />

DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 3/8-5/10/12<br />

NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />

STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 X STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />

1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />

1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />

1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />

2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />

3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />

4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />

5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />

6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

N/<br />

1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />

2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />

3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />

4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />

5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />

6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM?<br />

GREAT PROGRAM.<br />

Y<br />

WHY?<br />

7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM?<br />

NONE<br />

Y<br />

WHY?<br />

8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />

NONE<br />

9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />

NONE<br />

8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />

NONE<br />

9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />

NONE<br />

ARTIST: SHARON DICKER<br />

CONTRACT #: A7920<br />

TITLE OF PROGRAM: CREATIVE LITERACY - STORYTELLING<br />

TYPE OF PROGRAM: WORKSHOP<br />

DISTRICT/ SCHOOL: MT.VERNON/LONGFELLOW SCHOOL<br />

# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />

# OF STUDENTS: GRADE(S) PRE K<br />

DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE NOVEMBER, <strong>2012</strong><br />

NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />

STANDARD 1 STANDARD 2 STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />

1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />

ARTIST: SHIH ENTERPRISES, INC.<br />

CONTRACT #: A7935<br />

TITLE OF PROGRAM: PATRICIA SHIH - BIG IDEAS ABOUT CHARACTER ED<br />

CONCERT<br />

TYPE OF PROGRAM: ASSEMBLY<br />

DISTRICT/ SCHOOL: LAKELAND/GEORGE WASHINGTON ELEM.<br />

# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />

# OF STUDENTS: GRADE(S) K-5<br />

DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 11/16/11<br />

NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />

STANDARD 1 STANDARD 2 STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />

1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />

1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />

2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />

3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />

4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />

5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />

6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />

7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />

NONE<br />

8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />

NONE<br />

9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />

NONE<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

1.<br />

2.<br />

3.<br />

4.<br />

5.<br />

6.<br />

STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />

ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />

EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />

ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />

TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />

QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />

5<br />

5<br />

4<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />

THE STUDENTS THOROUGHTLY ENJOYED THE MUSIC AND SONGS.<br />

THEY LEARNED ABOUT CHARACTER EDUCATION.<br />

8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />

NONE<br />

9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />

WE FEEL THE PROGRAM SUPPORTS PBIS AND OUR CHARACTER<br />

EDUCATION PROGRAM. EACH PERFORMANCE IS WELL THOUGHT<br />

OUT, PLANNED AND IMPLEMENTED FLAWLESSLY.<br />

Arts in Education Service - School Evaluations <strong>2011</strong>-<strong>2012</strong><br />

Page 284 of 332


ARTIST: SHIH ENTERPRISES, INC.<br />

CONTRACT #: A8094<br />

TITLE OF PROGRAM: PATRICIA SHIH - LET'S GO TO CHINA SHOW<br />

TYPE OF PROGRAM: WORKSHOP<br />

DISTRICT/ SCHOOL: LAKELAND/GEORGE WASHINGTON ELEM.<br />

# OF TEACHERS: 3<br />

# OF STUDENTS: 60 GRADE(S) 3<br />

DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 5/22/12<br />

NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />

STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 X STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4 X<br />

ARTIST: SIERRA ASPREA<br />

CONTRACT #: A8081<br />

TITLE OF PROGRAM: DIRECTOR OF THE SENIOR REVUE<br />

TYPE OF PROGRAM: RESIDENCY<br />

DISTRICT/ SCHOOL:<br />

# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />

ARDSLEY/ARDSLEY HIGH SCHOOL<br />

# OF STUDENTS: 60 GRADE(S) 12<br />

DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 12/1/11-1/21/12<br />

NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />

STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 X STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />

1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />

1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />

1.<br />

2.<br />

3.<br />

4.<br />

5.<br />

6.<br />

STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />

ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />

EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />

ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />

TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />

QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

4<br />

5<br />

5<br />

7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />

ARTIST PRESENTED VARIOUS ARTIFACTS THAT STUDENTS FOUND<br />

INTERESTING.<br />

8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />

ARTIST NEEDS TO INCLUDE SOME TIME FOR Q & A.<br />

9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />

NONE<br />

ARTIST: SIMONA RODANO dba ITALIANA<br />

TITLE OF PROGRAM: ITALIAN MUSICAL THEATRE<br />

TYPE OF PROGRAM: ASSEMBLY<br />

DISTRICT/ SCHOOL:<br />

TUCKAHOE/W. E. COTTLE ELEM.<br />

CONTRACT #: A8366<br />

# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />

# OF STUDENTS: GRADE(S) K-5<br />

DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE<br />

1/27/12<br />

NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />

STANDARD 1 STANDARD 2 STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4 X<br />

1.<br />

2.<br />

3.<br />

4.<br />

5.<br />

6.<br />

STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />

ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />

EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />

ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />

TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />

QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />

SIERRA HAS A CLEAR SENSE OF HOW THIS PRODUCTION WORKS<br />

WITHIN THE CULTURE OF OUR SCHOOL.<br />

8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />

NONE<br />

9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />

ARTIST:<br />

THE RESPECT THE STUDENTS GIVE HER AND THE QUALITY OF THE<br />

SHOW IS A TESTAMENT TO THE VALUE OF SIERRA.<br />

SINGERS OF UNITED LANDS<br />

TITLE OF PROGRAM: MUSICAL RESIDENCY<br />

TYPE OF PROGRAM: WORKSHOP<br />

DISTRICT/ SCHOOL:<br />

CONTRACT #: A7870<br />

KATONAH/LEWISBORO/KATONAH ELEM. SCHOOL<br />

# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />

# OF STUDENTS: 490 GRADE(S) K-5<br />

DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 4/30-5/2/12<br />

NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />

STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4 X<br />

1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />

1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />

1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />

2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />

3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />

4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />

5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />

6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />

7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />

ESPECIALLY FOR THE YOUNGER GRADES.<br />

8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />

NONE<br />

9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />

NONE<br />

4<br />

4<br />

3<br />

4<br />

4<br />

4<br />

1.<br />

2.<br />

3.<br />

4.<br />

5.<br />

6.<br />

STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />

ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />

EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />

ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />

TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />

QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

N/<br />

7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />

WE HAVE HAD S.O.U.L. SEVERAL YEARS AND THE STUDENTS LOVE<br />

THE PROGRAM. THE STUDENTS CAN BE HEARD SINGING THE<br />

SONGS ON THE PLAYGROUND AND THEY HAVE A DEEPER<br />

UNDERSTANDING OUR OTHER CULTURES AROUND THE WORLD.<br />

8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />

NONE<br />

9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />

NONE<br />

Arts in Education Service - School Evaluations <strong>2011</strong>-<strong>2012</strong><br />

Page 285 of 332


ARTIST: SINGERS OF UNITED LANDS<br />

CONTRACT #: A8810<br />

TITLE OF PROGRAM: MUSICAL RESIDENCY<br />

TYPE OF PROGRAM: WORKSHOP<br />

DISTRICT/ SCHOOL: KATONAH/LEWISBORO/INCREASE MILLER ELEM.<br />

# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />

# OF STUDENTS: GRADE(S) K-5<br />

DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 5/3 & 4/12<br />

NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />

STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4 X<br />

ARTIST: SLIM GOODBODY ASSEMBLY PROGRAM CONTRACT #: A7529<br />

TITLE OF PROGRAM: MUSICAL HEALTH SHOW<br />

TYPE OF PROGRAM: ASSEMBLY<br />

DISTRICT/ SCHOOL:<br />

# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />

LAKELAND/VAN CORT ELEM.<br />

# OF STUDENTS: 650 GRADE(S) K-5<br />

DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 6/6/12<br />

NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />

STANDARD 1 STANDARD 2 STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />

1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />

1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />

1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />

2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />

3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />

4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />

5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />

6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />

2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />

3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />

4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />

5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />

6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />

THE SINGERS WERE AMAZING. THEY WERE FRIENDLY AND<br />

EXTREMELY INFORMATIVE. THEY KNOW HOW TO KEEP THE<br />

STUDENTS ENGAGED.<br />

8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />

NONE<br />

9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />

THANK YOU. THIS WAS A WONDERFUL PROGRAM.<br />

7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />

HE WAS GREAT AND VERY ENGAGING TO CHILDREN AT ALL<br />

LEVELS.<br />

8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />

NONE<br />

9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />

IT WAS VERY ENGAGING, FUN, AND RELATED TO THE CHILDREN<br />

VERY WELL.<br />

ARTIST: SOFIA ZIELYK<br />

CONTRACT #: A7948<br />

TITLE OF PROGRAM: ART OF PYSANKY EASTER EGGS - UKRANIUM EGGS<br />

TYPE OF PROGRAM: WORKSHOP<br />

DISTRICT/ SCHOOL:<br />

# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />

HASTINGS/HILLSIDE ELEM.<br />

# OF STUDENTS: 123 GRADE(S) 3<br />

DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 3/22/12<br />

NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />

STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 X STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4 X<br />

ARTIST: SOPHIA MORTON<br />

CONTRACT #: A7745<br />

TITLE OF PROGRAM: COSTUMING & MAKE-UP FOR THE FALL SHOW<br />

TYPE OF PROGRAM: RESIDENCY<br />

DISTRICT/ SCHOOL: KATONAH/LEWISBORO/JOHN JAY HIGH SCHOOL<br />

# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />

# OF STUDENTS: 20 GRADE(S) 9-12<br />

DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 11/1-20/11<br />

NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />

STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 X STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />

1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />

1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />

1.<br />

2.<br />

3.<br />

4.<br />

5.<br />

6.<br />

STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />

ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />

EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />

ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />

TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />

QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />

SHE WAS KNOWLEDGEABLE AND UNDERSTOOD HOW TO TALK TO<br />

CHILDREN AND KEEP THEIR INTEREST.<br />

8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />

NONE<br />

9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />

WE HOPE TO HAVE HER RETURN.<br />

1.<br />

2.<br />

3.<br />

4.<br />

5.<br />

6.<br />

STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />

ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />

EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />

ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />

TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />

QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />

SOPHIA IS A TERRIFIC ARTIST. SHE REALLY KNOWS DESIGN AND<br />

HOW TO COMMUNICATE ITS PRINCIPLES TO STUDENTS.<br />

8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />

NONE<br />

9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />

I DON'T THINK THIS ARTIST IS AVAILABLE FOR MUCH FUTURE<br />

WORK - HER NON-EDUCATIONAL WORK IS REALLY TAKING OFF.<br />

Arts in Education Service - School Evaluations <strong>2011</strong>-<strong>2012</strong><br />

Page 286 of 332


ARTIST: SOREN BENNICK PROD., INC.<br />

CONTRACT #: A7872<br />

TITLE OF PROGRAM: POWER OF ONE - ANTI-BULLYING SHOW<br />

TYPE OF PROGRAM: ASSEMBLY<br />

DISTRICT/ SCHOOL:<br />

# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />

BYRAM HILLS/COMAN HILL ELEM.<br />

# OF STUDENTS: 600 GRADE(S) K-2<br />

DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 11/8/11<br />

NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />

STANDARD 1 STANDARD 2 STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />

1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />

ARTIST: SOUND APPLICATIONS, LTD<br />

CONTRACT #: A7707<br />

TITLE OF PROGRAM: ED JOHNSON - SOUND DESIGNER FOR THE SHOW -<br />

ANNIE GET YOUR GUN<br />

TYPE OF PROGRAM: RESIDENCY<br />

DISTRICT/ SCHOOL: LAKELAND/WALTER PANAS HIGH SCHOOL<br />

# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />

# OF STUDENTS: 100 GRADE(S) 9-12<br />

DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 11/14-19/11<br />

NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />

STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 X STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />

1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />

1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />

2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />

3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />

4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />

5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />

6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />

7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />

THEY DO A GREAT JOB OF INTERDUCING YOUNG CHILDREN TO<br />

TERMS LIKE BULLYING, VICTIM, BYSTANDER AND UPSTANDING.<br />

8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />

MOLLY WAS RUDE TO STAFF. PERHAPS CHOOSE ANOTHER<br />

ACTRESS.<br />

9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />

NONE<br />

3<br />

4<br />

3<br />

3<br />

3<br />

3<br />

1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />

2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />

3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />

4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />

5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />

6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />

7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />

NONE<br />

8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />

NONE<br />

9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />

NONE<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

ARTIST: SOUND APPLICATIONS, LTD<br />

CONTRACT #: A8328<br />

TITLE OF PROGRAM: ED JOHNSON - SOUND DESIGNER FOR THE SPRING<br />

MUSICAL - MY FAIR LADY<br />

TYPE OF PROGRAM: RESIDENCY<br />

DISTRICT/ SCHOOL: LAKELAND/WALTER PANAS HIGH SCHOOL<br />

# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />

# OF STUDENTS: 200 GRADE(S) 9-12<br />

DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 4/30-5/512<br />

NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />

STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 X STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />

1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />

ARTIST: SPANISH DANCE ART COMPANY, INC. CONTRACT #: A8539<br />

TITLE OF PROGRAM: FIESTA FLAMENCA LECTURE & DEMONSTRATION<br />

TYPE OF PROGRAM: ASSEMBLY<br />

DISTRICT/ SCHOOL:<br />

# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />

PELHAM/HUTCHINSON ELEM.<br />

# OF STUDENTS: 360 GRADE(S) K-5<br />

DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 2/26/12<br />

NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />

STANDARD 1 STANDARD 2 STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4 X<br />

1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />

1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />

2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />

3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />

4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />

5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />

6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />

7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />

NONE<br />

8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />

NONE<br />

9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />

NONE<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

1.<br />

2.<br />

3.<br />

4.<br />

5.<br />

6.<br />

STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />

ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />

EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />

ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />

TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />

QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />

5<br />

5<br />

4<br />

5<br />

4<br />

4<br />

7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />

THE PERFORMERS WERE HIGHLY SKILLED, VERY ENGAGING AND<br />

BROUGHT TO LIFE A BEAUTIFUL ART FORM WHICH MOST<br />

STUDENTS WERE PROBABLY UNFAMILIAR.<br />

8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />

NONE<br />

9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />

NONE<br />

Arts in Education Service - School Evaluations <strong>2011</strong>-<strong>2012</strong><br />

Page 287 of 332


ARTIST: SPECIAL PROGRAMS & RESOURCE CO<br />

CONTRACT #: A8469<br />

TITLE OF PROGRAM: ANNE ZIMMERMAN - KIDS EXPRESS<br />

TYPE OF PROGRAM: WORKSHOP<br />

DISTRICT/ SCHOOL:<br />

# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />

LAKELAND/VAN CORT ELEM.<br />

# OF STUDENTS: 8 GRADE(S) 1 & 2<br />

DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 2/8-5/9/12<br />

NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />

STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 X STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />

ARTIST: SPECIAL PROGRAMS & RESOURCE CO CONTRACT #: A7822<br />

TITLE OF PROGRAM: ANNE ZIMMERMAN - KIDS EXPRESS<br />

TYPE OF PROGRAM: WORKSHOP<br />

DISTRICT/ SCHOOL:<br />

# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />

LAKELAND/VAN CORT ELEM.<br />

# OF STUDENTS: 7 GRADE(S) 1 & 2<br />

DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 10/12/11-1/4/12<br />

NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />

STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 X STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />

1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />

1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />

1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />

2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />

3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />

4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />

5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />

6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />

2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />

3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />

4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />

5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />

6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />

4<br />

4<br />

4<br />

4<br />

4<br />

4<br />

7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM?<br />

NONE<br />

Y<br />

WHY?<br />

7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM?<br />

NONE<br />

Y<br />

WHY?<br />

8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />

NONE<br />

9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />

NONE<br />

8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />

NONE<br />

9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />

NONE<br />

ARTIST: SPECIAL PROGRAMS & RESOURCE CO CONTRACT #: A7823B<br />

TITLE OF PROGRAM: ANNE ZIMMERMAN - KIDS EXPRESS<br />

TYPE OF PROGRAM: WORKSHOP<br />

DISTRICT/ SCHOOL: LAKELAND/THOMAS JEFFERSON ELEM.<br />

# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />

# OF STUDENTS: 7 GRADE(S) 1 & 2<br />

DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 10/14/11-2/3/12<br />

NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />

STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 X STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />

ARTIST: SPECIAL PROGRAMS & RESOURCE CO CONTRACT #: A8470B<br />

TITLE OF PROGRAM: ANNE ZIMMERMAN - KIDS EXPRESS<br />

TYPE OF PROGRAM: WORKSHOP<br />

DISTRICT/ SCHOOL: LAKELAND/THOMAS JEFFERSON ELEM.<br />

# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />

# OF STUDENTS: 8 GRADE(S) 3<br />

DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 2/10-6/8/12<br />

NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />

STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 X STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />

1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />

1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />

1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />

2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />

3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />

4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />

5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />

6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />

4<br />

4<br />

4<br />

4<br />

4<br />

4<br />

1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />

2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />

3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />

4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />

5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />

6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM?<br />

NONE<br />

Y<br />

WHY?<br />

7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM?<br />

NONE<br />

Y<br />

WHY?<br />

8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />

NONE<br />

9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />

NONE<br />

8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />

NONE<br />

9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />

NONE<br />

Arts in Education Service - School Evaluations <strong>2011</strong>-<strong>2012</strong><br />

Page 288 of 332


ARTIST: SPECIAL PROGRAMS & RESOURCE CO<br />

CONTRACT #: A8467B<br />

TITLE OF PROGRAM: ANNE ZIMMERMAN - KIDS EXPRESS<br />

TYPE OF PROGRAM: WORKSHOP<br />

DISTRICT/ SCHOOL:<br />

# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />

LAKELAND/LINCOLN-TITUS ELEM.<br />

# OF STUDENTS: 7 GRADE(S) 1-3<br />

DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 2/7-5/8/12<br />

NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />

STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 X STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />

ARTIST: SPECIAL PROGRAMS & RESOURCE CO CONTRACT #: A8466C<br />

TITLE OF PROGRAM: CARRIE LICHTIG - KIDS EXPRESS<br />

TYPE OF PROGRAM: WORKSHOP<br />

DISTRICT/ SCHOOL: LAKELAND/GEORGE WASHINGTON ELEM.<br />

# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />

# OF STUDENTS: 8 GRADE(S) 2 & 3<br />

DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 2/6-5/21/12<br />

NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />

STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 X STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />

1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />

1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />

1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />

2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />

3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />

4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />

5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />

6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />

2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />

3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />

4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />

5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />

6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM?<br />

NONE<br />

Y<br />

WHY?<br />

7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM?<br />

NONE<br />

Y<br />

WHY?<br />

8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />

NONE<br />

9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />

NONE<br />

8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />

NONE<br />

9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />

NONE<br />

ARTIST: SPECIAL PROGRAMS & RESOURCE CO CONTRACT #: A7821A<br />

TITLE OF PROGRAM: CARRIE LICHTIG - KIDS EXPRESS<br />

TYPE OF PROGRAM: WORKSHOP<br />

DISTRICT/ SCHOOL: LAKELAND/GEORGE WASHINGTON ELEM.<br />

# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />

# OF STUDENTS: 9 GRADE(S) 2 & 3<br />

DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 10/17/11-1/23/12<br />

NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />

STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 X STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />

ARTIST: SPECIAL PROGRAMS & RESOURCE CO CONTRACT #: A8470A<br />

TITLE OF PROGRAM: JENNIFER AVITABILE - KIDS EXPRESS<br />

TYPE OF PROGRAM: WORKSHOP<br />

DISTRICT/ SCHOOL: LAKELAND/THOMAS JEFFERSON ELEM.<br />

# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />

# OF STUDENTS: 7 GRADE(S) 1 & 2<br />

DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 2/10-6/8/12<br />

NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />

STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 X STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />

1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />

1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />

1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />

2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />

3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />

4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />

5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />

6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />

4<br />

4<br />

4<br />

4<br />

4<br />

4<br />

1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />

2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />

3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />

4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />

5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />

6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />

4<br />

4<br />

4<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM?<br />

NONE<br />

Y<br />

WHY?<br />

7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM?<br />

NONE<br />

Y<br />

WHY?<br />

8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />

NONE<br />

9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />

NONE<br />

8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />

NONE<br />

9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />

NONE<br />

Arts in Education Service - School Evaluations <strong>2011</strong>-<strong>2012</strong><br />

Page 289 of 332


ARTIST: SPECIAL PROGRAMS & RESOURCE CO<br />

CONTRACT #: A7823A<br />

TITLE OF PROGRAM: JENNIFER AVITABILE - KIDS EXPRESS<br />

TYPE OF PROGRAM: WORKSHOP<br />

DISTRICT/ SCHOOL: LAKELAND/THOMAS JEFFERSON ELEM.<br />

# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />

# OF STUDENTS: 9 GRADE(S) 3<br />

DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 10/14/11-2/3/12<br />

NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />

STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 X STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />

ARTIST: SPECIAL PROGRAMS & RESOURCE CO CONTRACT #: A8466A<br />

TITLE OF PROGRAM: KATRINA KLEIN - KIDS EXPRESS<br />

TYPE OF PROGRAM: WORKSHOP<br />

DISTRICT/ SCHOOL: LAKELAND/GEORGE WASHINGTON ELEM.<br />

# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />

# OF STUDENTS: 7 GRADE(S) K<br />

DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 2/6-5/21/12<br />

NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />

STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 X STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />

1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />

1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />

1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />

2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />

3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />

4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />

5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />

6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />

4<br />

4<br />

4<br />

4<br />

4<br />

4<br />

1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />

2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />

3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />

4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />

5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />

6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM?<br />

NONE<br />

Y<br />

WHY?<br />

7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM?<br />

NONE<br />

Y<br />

WHY?<br />

8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />

NONE<br />

9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />

NONE<br />

8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />

NONE<br />

9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />

NONE<br />

ARTIST: SPECIAL PROGRAMS & RESOURCE CO CONTRACT #: A7821B<br />

TITLE OF PROGRAM: RACHEL ARRIETA - KIDS EXPRESS<br />

TYPE OF PROGRAM: WORKSHOP<br />

DISTRICT/ SCHOOL: LAKELAND/GEORGE WASHINGTON ELEM.<br />

# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />

# OF STUDENTS: 8 GRADE(S) K & 1<br />

DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 10/17/11-1/23/12<br />

NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />

STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 X STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />

ARTIST: SPECIAL PROGRAMS & RESOURCE CO CONTRACT #: A8467A<br />

TITLE OF PROGRAM: RANDALL STUART - MAGIC MUSIC<br />

TYPE OF PROGRAM: WORKSHOP<br />

DISTRICT/ SCHOOL:<br />

# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />

LAKELAND/LINCOLN-TITUS ELEM.<br />

# OF STUDENTS: 8 GRADE(S) 1-4<br />

DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 2/6-5/21/12<br />

NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />

STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 X STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />

1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />

1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />

1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />

2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />

3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />

4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />

5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />

6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />

4<br />

4<br />

4<br />

4<br />

4<br />

4<br />

1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />

2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />

3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />

4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />

5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />

6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM?<br />

NONE<br />

Y<br />

WHY?<br />

7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM?<br />

NONE<br />

Y<br />

WHY?<br />

8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />

NONE<br />

9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />

NONE<br />

8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />

NONE<br />

9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />

NONE<br />

Arts in Education Service - School Evaluations <strong>2011</strong>-<strong>2012</strong><br />

Page 290 of 332


ARTIST: SPECIAL PROGRAMS & RESOURCE CO<br />

CONTRACT #: A8466B<br />

TITLE OF PROGRAM: REBECCA ROTHE - KIDS EXPRESS<br />

TYPE OF PROGRAM: WORKSHOP<br />

DISTRICT/ SCHOOL: LAKELAND/GEORGE WASHINGTON ELEM.<br />

# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />

# OF STUDENTS: 9 GRADE(S) 1<br />

DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 2/6-5/21/12<br />

NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />

STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 X STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />

ARTIST: SPECIAL PROGRAMS & RESOURCE CO CONTRACT #: A8468<br />

TITLE OF PROGRAM: REBECCA ROTHE - KIDS EXPRESS<br />

TYPE OF PROGRAM: WORKSHOP<br />

DISTRICT/ SCHOOL: LAKELAND/BENJAMIN FRANKLIN ELEM.<br />

# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />

# OF STUDENTS: 9 GRADE(S) 1-3<br />

DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 2/7-5/8/12<br />

NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />

STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 X STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />

1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />

1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />

1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />

2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />

3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />

4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />

5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />

6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />

2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />

3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />

4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />

5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />

6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM?<br />

NONE<br />

Y<br />

WHY?<br />

7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM?<br />

NONE<br />

Y<br />

WHY?<br />

8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />

NONE<br />

9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />

NONE<br />

8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />

NONE<br />

9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />

NONE<br />

ARTIST: SQUEAKY CLEAN MUSIC CORP. dba SQ CONTRACT #: A8719<br />

TITLE OF PROGRAM: RAVE ON THE ROOTS OF ROCK & ROLL - GROWING<br />

UP IN THE 60'S<br />

TYPE OF PROGRAM: ASSEMBLY<br />

DISTRICT/ SCHOOL: TUCKAHOE/W. E. COTTLE ELEM. & MIDDLE SCHOOL<br />

# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />

# OF STUDENTS: 260 GRADE(S) K-8<br />

DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 5/14/12<br />

NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />

STANDARD 1 STANDARD 2 STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4 X<br />

1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />

ARTIST: STACY MONTEIRO<br />

CONTRACT #: A7857<br />

TITLE OF PROGRAM: HIP HOP DANCING<br />

TYPE OF PROGRAM: RESIDENCY<br />

DISTRICT/ SCHOOL: EASTCHESTER/EASTCHESTER HIGH SCHOOL<br />

# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />

# OF STUDENTS: 15 GRADE(S) 9-12<br />

DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 10/30/11-1/23/12<br />

NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />

STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 X STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />

1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />

1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />

2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />

3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />

4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />

5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />

6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />

7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />

THE PERFORMANCES WERE OUTSTANDING.<br />

8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />

NONE<br />

9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />

NONE<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

1.<br />

2.<br />

3.<br />

4.<br />

5.<br />

6.<br />

STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />

ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />

EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />

ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />

TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />

QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />

SHE WAS WONDERFUL IN EVERY ASPECT AND THE DANCERS LOVE<br />

BEING IN HER PIECE.<br />

8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />

NONE<br />

9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />

NONE<br />

Arts in Education Service - School Evaluations <strong>2011</strong>-<strong>2012</strong><br />

Page 291 of 332


ARTIST: STAMPFLI ENTERPRISES, LLC dba SCAR CONTRACT #: A8617A<br />

TITLE OF PROGRAM: KATIE WOOLDRIDGE - VIOLIN<br />

TYPE OF PROGRAM: WORKSHOP<br />

DISTRICT/ SCHOOL:<br />

EASTCHESTER/ANNE HUTCHINSON ELEM.<br />

# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />

# OF STUDENTS: GRADE(S) 2-5<br />

DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE<br />

3/5-5/14/12<br />

NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />

STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 X STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />

1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />

1.<br />

2.<br />

3.<br />

4.<br />

5.<br />

6.<br />

STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />

ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />

EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />

ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />

TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />

QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />

4<br />

4<br />

4<br />

4<br />

4<br />

4<br />

7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />

EXCELLENT DELIVERY OF MUSIC INSTRUCTION. VERY ENGAGING.<br />

8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />

NONE<br />

9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />

NONE<br />

ARTIST: STAMPFLI ENTERPRISES, LLC dba SCAR CONTRACT #: A8617B<br />

TITLE OF PROGRAM: ZACH COHEN - GUITAR<br />

TYPE OF PROGRAM: WORKSHOP<br />

DISTRICT/ SCHOOL:<br />

EASTCHESTER/ANNE HUTCHINSON ELEM.<br />

# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />

# OF STUDENTS: GRADE(S) 2-5<br />

DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE<br />

3/5-5/14/12<br />

NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />

STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 X STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />

ARTIST:<br />

STAMPFLI ENTERPRISES, LLC dba SCAR CONTRACT #: A7728<br />

TITLE OF PROGRAM: LYNWOOD JIANG - SOMETIMES YOU JUST HAVE TO<br />

FIDDLE AROUND<br />

TYPE OF PROGRAM: WORKSHOP<br />

DISTRICT/ SCHOOL:<br />

EASTCHESTER/ANNE HUTCHINSON ELEM.<br />

# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />

# OF STUDENTS: GRADE(S) 2-5<br />

DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE<br />

10/4-12/20/11<br />

NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />

STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 X STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />

1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />

1.<br />

2.<br />

3.<br />

4.<br />

5.<br />

6.<br />

STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />

ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />

EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />

ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />

TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />

QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />

4<br />

4<br />

4<br />

4<br />

4<br />

4<br />

7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />

THIS INSTRUCTOR WAS VERY ORGANIZED. PRESENTATIONS WERE<br />

EXCELLENT AND STUDENTS LOVED THE PROGRAM.<br />

8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />

NONE<br />

9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />

NONE<br />

ARTIST: STANLEY FRIEDMANN dba FRIEDMANN CONTRACT #: A8071<br />

TITLE OF PROGRAM: AUTHOR VISIT<br />

TYPE OF PROGRAM: ASSEMBLY<br />

DISTRICT/ SCHOOL: NEW ROCHELLE/WARD ELEM. SCHOOL<br />

# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />

# OF STUDENTS: 177 GRADE(S) 5<br />

DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 5/4/12<br />

NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />

STANDARD 1 STANDARD 2 STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />

1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />

1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />

1.<br />

2.<br />

3.<br />

4.<br />

5.<br />

6.<br />

STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />

ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />

EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />

ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />

TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />

QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />

4<br />

4<br />

4<br />

4<br />

4<br />

4<br />

7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />

EXCELLENT DELIVERY OF MUSIC INSTRUCTION. VERY ENGAGING.<br />

8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />

NONE<br />

9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />

NONE<br />

1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />

2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />

3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />

4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />

5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />

6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />

7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? ? WHY?<br />

HE WAS ENGAGING. I AM NOT SURE THE CHILDREN CONNECTED<br />

WITH HIS MESSAGE THOUGH.<br />

8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />

THERE WASN'T MUCH FOR THE CHILDREN TO HOOK ONTO THAT<br />

COULD HELP THEM START WRITING.<br />

9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />

WHILE HE WAS ENGAGING AND THE CHILDREN ENJOYED<br />

LISTENING TO HIM, I AM NOT SO SURE HOW VALUABLE THE<br />

PROGRAM WAS.<br />

4<br />

3<br />

2<br />

4<br />

4<br />

N/<br />

Arts in Education Service - School Evaluations <strong>2011</strong>-<strong>2012</strong><br />

Page 292 of 332


ARTIST: STEPHEN AUSTIN<br />

CONTRACT #: A8750<br />

TITLE OF PROGRAM: TRUMPET PLAYER FOR THE SHOW - A FUNNY THING<br />

HAPPENED ON THE WAY TO THE FORUM<br />

TYPE OF PROGRAM: ASSEMBLY<br />

DISTRICT/ SCHOOL: PUTNAM VALLEY/PUTNAM VALLEY HIGH SCHOOL<br />

# OF TEACHERS: 3<br />

# OF STUDENTS: 400 GRADE(S) 9-12<br />

DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 4/13-23/12<br />

NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />

STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />

1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />

ARTIST: STEPHEN AUSTIN<br />

CONTRACT #: A8064<br />

TITLE OF PROGRAM: TRUMPET PLAYER FOR THE SHOW - BARNUM<br />

TYPE OF PROGRAM: ASSEMBLY<br />

DISTRICT/ SCHOOL: NORTH SALEM/NORTH SALEM MIDDLE & HIGH SCHOO<br />

# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />

# OF STUDENTS: 200 GRADE(S) 6-12<br />

DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 2/4-12/12<br />

NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />

STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />

1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />

1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />

2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />

3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />

4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />

5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />

6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />

7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />

NONE<br />

8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />

NONE<br />

9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />

NONE<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

N/<br />

1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />

2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />

3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />

4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />

5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />

6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />

7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />

MR. AUSTIN IS INVALUABLE TO OUR PRODUCTION AS AN<br />

INSTRUMENTALIST, AN ORCHESTRATOR AND A CONTRACTOR.<br />

8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />

NONE<br />

9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />

NONE<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

ARTIST: STEPHEN COOK<br />

CONTRACT #: A7802<br />

TITLE OF PROGRAM: DIRECTOR FOR THE FALL DRAM<br />

TYPE OF PROGRAM: RESIDENCY<br />

DISTRICT/ SCHOOL: CROTON/PIERRE VAN CORT MIDDLE SCHOOL<br />

# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />

# OF STUDENTS: 35 GRADE(S) 5-8<br />

DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 10/11-11/19/11<br />

NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />

STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 X STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />

ARTIST: STEVE BURCHARD<br />

CONTRACT #: A8591<br />

TITLE OF PROGRAM: LEARNING TO PERFORM MAGIC<br />

TYPE OF PROGRAM: ASSEMBLY<br />

DISTRICT/ SCHOOL: EASTCHESTER/WAVERLY EARLY CHILDHOOD CTR<br />

# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />

# OF STUDENTS: GRADE(S) 1<br />

DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 3/9-5/7/12<br />

NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />

STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 X STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />

1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />

1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />

1.<br />

2.<br />

3.<br />

4.<br />

5.<br />

6.<br />

STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />

ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />

EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />

ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />

TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />

QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />

STEPHEN WAS VERY APPROPRIATE WITH STUDENTS AND HELPED<br />

THEM TO CREATE A WONDERFUL SHOW. THE STUDENTS WERE<br />

MOTIVATED AND ENTHUSIASTIC ABOUT THEIR ROLES.<br />

8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />

NONE<br />

9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />

NONE<br />

1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />

2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />

3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />

4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />

5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />

6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />

7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />

THE CHILDREN REALLY ENJOYED LEARNING TRICKS AND<br />

PARTICIPATING IN A MAGIC SHOW.<br />

8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />

NONE<br />

9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />

NONE<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

Arts in Education Service - School Evaluations <strong>2011</strong>-<strong>2012</strong><br />

Page 293 of 332


ARTIST: STEVE MAX, INC.<br />

CONTRACT #: A8139<br />

TITLE OF PROGRAM: SIMON SEZ FOR BETTER LISTENING<br />

TYPE OF PROGRAM: ASSEMBLY<br />

DISTRICT/ SCHOOL:<br />

# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />

CHAPPAQUA/GRAFFLIN ELEM.<br />

# OF STUDENTS: 115 GRADE(S) K-2<br />

DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 12/15/11<br />

NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />

STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />

ARTIST: STEVE MAX, INC.<br />

CONTRACT #: A8089<br />

TITLE OF PROGRAM: SIMON SEZ FOR BETTER LISTENING<br />

TYPE OF PROGRAM: ASSEMBLY<br />

DISTRICT/ SCHOOL: EASTCHESTER/WAVERLY EARLY CHILDHOOD CTR<br />

# OF TEACHERS: 15 # OF STUDENTS: 525 GRADE(S) K & 1<br />

DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 1/12/12<br />

NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />

STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />

1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />

1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />

1.<br />

2.<br />

3.<br />

4.<br />

5.<br />

6.<br />

STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />

ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />

EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />

ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />

TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />

QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />

4<br />

4<br />

4<br />

4<br />

5<br />

4<br />

7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />

THE SPEAKER WAS EXCELLENT AND THE CHILDREN HAD A GREAT<br />

TIME.<br />

8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />

GET THE CHILDREN MOVING A LITTLE MORE.<br />

9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />

ALL IN ALL, A GREAT PROGRAM THAT WAS ENGAGING.<br />

ARTIST: STEVEN KELLOGG<br />

TITLE OF PROGRAM: AUTHOR VISIT<br />

TYPE OF PROGRAM: ASSEMBLY<br />

DISTRICT/ SCHOOL:<br />

SOMERS/PRIMROSE ELEM.<br />

CONTRACT #: A8867<br />

# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />

# OF STUDENTS: 241 GRADE(S) 2<br />

DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE<br />

5/17/12<br />

NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />

STANDARD 1 STANDARD 2 STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />

1.<br />

2.<br />

3.<br />

4.<br />

5.<br />

6.<br />

STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />

ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />

EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />

ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />

TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />

QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />

STEVE IS ONE OF THE BEST PERFORMERS THAT COMES TO<br />

WAVERLY EACH YEAR. HE IS FUN, INTERACTIVE AND ENGAGING.<br />

HE KNOWS HOW TO GET HIS POINT ACROSS AND GET THE<br />

STUDENTS UNDIVIDED ATTENTION.<br />

8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />

NONE<br />

9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />

ARTIST:<br />

THE CHILDREN ARE ENTERTAINED WHILE THEY ARE LEARNING. HE<br />

TEACHES WONDERFUL CONCEPTS IN A VERY POSITIVE<br />

INTERESTING AND INTERACTIVE WAY.<br />

STEVEN KELLOGG<br />

TITLE OF PROGRAM: AUTHOR VISIT<br />

TYPE OF PROGRAM: ASSEMBLY<br />

DISTRICT/ SCHOOL:<br />

CHAPPAQUA/GRAFFLIN ELEM.<br />

CONTRACT #: A7976<br />

# OF TEACHERS: 3<br />

# OF STUDENTS: 80 GRADE(S) K-2<br />

DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 12/6/11<br />

NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />

STANDARD 1 STANDARD 2 ` STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />

1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />

1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />

1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />

2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />

3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />

4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />

5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />

6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />

2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />

3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />

4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />

5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />

6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

4<br />

5<br />

N/<br />

7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM?<br />

NONE<br />

8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />

NONE<br />

9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />

GREAT JOB. WE LOVE TO HOST STEVEN.<br />

Y<br />

WHY?<br />

7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />

HE WAS QUITE ENGAGING AND THE STUDENTS SEEM TO ENJOY<br />

THE PROGRAM.<br />

8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />

SHORTEN PROGRAM BY 10 MINUTES.<br />

9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />

WE LIKED HOW THE STUDENTS WERE ABLE TO TAKE HOME THE<br />

MINI POSTERS.<br />

Arts in Education Service - School Evaluations <strong>2011</strong>-<strong>2012</strong><br />

Page 294 of 332


ARTIST:<br />

STEVEN KELLOGG<br />

TITLE OF PROGRAM: AUTHOR VISIT<br />

TYPE OF PROGRAM: ASSEMBLY<br />

DISTRICT/ SCHOOL:<br />

CHAPPAQUA/GRAFFLIN ELEM.<br />

CONTRACT #: A7976<br />

# OF TEACHERS: 4<br />

# OF STUDENTS: 76 GRADE(S) K-2<br />

DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE<br />

12/6/11<br />

NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />

STANDARD 1 STANDARD 2 STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />

1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />

1.<br />

2.<br />

3.<br />

4.<br />

5.<br />

6.<br />

STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />

ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />

EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />

ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />

TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />

QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />

4<br />

5<br />

5<br />

4<br />

5<br />

N/<br />

7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />

THE PRESENTATION WAS HIGH ENERGY, INFORMATIVE AND WELL<br />

DONE.<br />

8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />

NONE<br />

9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />

ARTIST:<br />

IT WAS A REAL TREAT HAVING HIM VISIT.<br />

STRIKING VIKING STORY PIRATES, LLC<br />

TITLE OF PROGRAM: GREATEST HITS SHOW<br />

TYPE OF PROGRAM: ASSEMBLY<br />

DISTRICT/ SCHOOL:<br />

ARDSLEY/CONCORD ROAD ELEM.<br />

CONTRACT #: A8881<br />

# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />

# OF STUDENTS: GRADE(S) K-4<br />

DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE<br />

6/20/12<br />

NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />

STANDARD 1 STANDARD 2 STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />

1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />

1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />

2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />

3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />

4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />

5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />

6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />

7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />

THE SHOW HAD LOTS OF ENERGY AND CREATIVE FUN.<br />

8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />

IT WAS HARD TO HEAR SINCE THE AUDIENCE WAS SO BIG. I THINK<br />

HAVING 1/2 THE SCHOOL OR ONE GRADE WOULD BE BETTER.<br />

9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />

NONE<br />

4<br />

5<br />

4<br />

5<br />

3<br />

N/<br />

ARTIST: STEVEN MATURNO<br />

CONTRACT #: A8424<br />

TITLE OF PROGRAM: LIGHTING DESIGNER FOR THE SHOW - SIX DEGREES<br />

OF SEPARATION<br />

TYPE OF PROGRAM: RESIDENCY<br />

DISTRICT/ SCHOOL:<br />

CHAPPAQUA/HORACE GREELEY HIGH SCHOOL<br />

# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />

# OF STUDENTS: 22 GRADE(S) 9-12<br />

DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE<br />

2/17-3/12/12<br />

NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />

STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 X STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />

1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />

1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />

2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />

3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />

4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />

5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />

6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />

7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />

STEVE IS A GREAT DESIGNER AND WORKED REALLY WELL WITH<br />

THE STUDENTS<br />

8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />

.NONE<br />

9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />

ARTIST:<br />

I HOPE TO WORK WITH HIM IN THE FUTURE.<br />

SUSAN CUMMINGS<br />

CONTRACT #: A8441<br />

TITLE OF PROGRAM: CO PRODUCTION MANAGER FOR THE - SHOW A<br />

FUNNY THING HAPPENED ON THE WAY TO THE<br />

FORUM<br />

TYPE OF PROGRAM: RESIDENCY<br />

DISTRICT/ SCHOOL:<br />

PUTNAM VALLEY/PUTNAM VALLEY HIGH SCHOOL<br />

# OF TEACHERS: 3<br />

# OF STUDENTS: 400 GRADE(S) 9-12<br />

DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 3/3-4/23/12<br />

NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />

STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 X STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />

1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />

1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />

2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />

3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />

4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />

5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />

6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />

7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />

NONE<br />

8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />

NONE<br />

9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />

NONE<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

Arts in Education Service - School Evaluations <strong>2011</strong>-<strong>2012</strong><br />

Page 295 of 332


ARTIST: SUSAN CUMMINGS<br />

CONTRACT #: A7777<br />

TITLE OF PROGRAM: CO-PRODUCTION MANAGER FOR THE SHOW -<br />

DRACULA<br />

TYPE OF PROGRAM: RESIDENCY<br />

DISTRICT/ SCHOOL: PUTNAM VALLEY/PUTNAM VALLEY HIGH SCHOOL<br />

# OF TEACHERS: 2<br />

# OF STUDENTS: 50 GRADE(S) 9-12<br />

DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 11/1-12/5/11<br />

NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />

STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 X STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />

1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />

ARTIST: SUSAN FRIED<br />

CONTRACT #: A7996<br />

TITLE OF PROGRAM: ART & CULTURE OF YOGA<br />

TYPE OF PROGRAM: WORKSHOP<br />

DISTRICT/ SCHOOL: NEW ROCHELLE/JEFFERSON ELEM.<br />

# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />

# OF STUDENTS: 400 GRADE(S) K-5<br />

DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 1/4-2/15/12<br />

NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />

STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 X STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4 X<br />

1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />

1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />

2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />

3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />

4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />

5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />

6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />

7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />

NONE<br />

8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />

NONE<br />

9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />

NONE<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

1.<br />

2.<br />

3.<br />

4.<br />

5.<br />

6.<br />

STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />

ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />

EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />

ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />

TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />

QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />

SUSAN IS FANTASTIC. SHE HAS A WONDERFUL WAY OF WORKING<br />

WITH CHILDREN. TEACHES THEM EVERYTHING SHE KNOWS.<br />

8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />

NONE<br />

9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />

NONE<br />

ARTIST: SUSAN HOOVER<br />

CONTRACT #: A7577<br />

TITLE OF PROGRAM: POETRY RESIDENCY<br />

TYPE OF PROGRAM: RESIDENCY<br />

DISTRICT/ SCHOOL: BYRAM HILLS/H.C. CRITTENDEN MIDDLE SCHOOL<br />

# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />

# OF STUDENTS: 225 GRADE(S) 6<br />

DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 9/21-11/9/11<br />

NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />

STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 X STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />

ARTIST: SUSAN KAUFMAN<br />

CONTRACT #: A8582<br />

TITLE OF PROGRAM: CREATING A MURAL<br />

TYPE OF PROGRAM: RESIDENCY<br />

DISTRICT/ SCHOOL: PELHAM/PELHAM MIDDLE SCHOOL<br />

# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />

# OF STUDENTS: 200 GRADE(S) 8<br />

DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 3/13-22/12<br />

NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />

STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 X STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />

1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />

1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />

1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />

2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />

3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />

4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />

5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />

6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />

7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />

STUDENTS WERE ENGAGED AND PRODUCED GREAT POETRY.<br />

8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />

NONE<br />

9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />

GREAT JOB AS USUAL.<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

1.<br />

2.<br />

3.<br />

4.<br />

5.<br />

6.<br />

STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />

ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />

EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />

ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />

TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />

QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />

SUSAN IS AN AMAZING ARTIST AND TEACHER. THE STUDENTS<br />

WERE ENGAGED AND ABLE TO CREATE A SOPHISTICATED MURAL.<br />

8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />

NONE<br />

9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />

NONE<br />

Arts in Education Service - School Evaluations <strong>2011</strong>-<strong>2012</strong><br />

Page 296 of 332


ARTIST: SUSAN MACY<br />

CONTRACT #: A8447<br />

TITLE OF PROGRAM: AUTHOR VISIT<br />

TYPE OF PROGRAM: ASSEMBLY<br />

DISTRICT/ SCHOOL:<br />

# OF TEACHERS: 3<br />

BRIARCLIFF/TODD ELEM.<br />

# OF STUDENTS: 112 GRADE(S) 5<br />

DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 2/9/12<br />

NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />

STANDARD 1 STANDARD 2 STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4 X<br />

ARTIST: SUSAN PARKS<br />

CONTRACT #: A8145<br />

TITLE OF PROGRAM: ARTISAN SOAP MAKING<br />

TYPE OF PROGRAM: WORKSHOP<br />

DISTRICT/ SCHOOL: LAKELAND/COPPER BEECH MIDDLE SCHOOL<br />

# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />

# OF STUDENTS: 125 GRADE(S) 7 & 8<br />

DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 3/8-9/12<br />

NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />

STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 X STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />

1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />

1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />

1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />

2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />

3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />

4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />

5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />

6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />

7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />

SHE HAD A LOT OF INTERESTING INFORMATION TO SHARE.<br />

8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />

SHE SEEMS A LITTLE NERVOUS AT TIMES AND COULD HAVE BEEN<br />

MORE DYNAMIC.<br />

9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />

NONE<br />

ARTIST: SUSAN SKELSEY<br />

CONTRACT #: A7733A<br />

TITLE OF PROGRAM: LEARNING TO LOOK - LATE 18TH & 19TH CENTURY<br />

EUROPEAN ART<br />

TYPE OF PROGRAM: WORKSHOP<br />

DISTRICT/ SCHOOL:<br />

CHAPPAQUA/ALL ELEM. SCHOOLS<br />

# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />

# OF STUDENTS: GRADE(S) K-4<br />

DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE<br />

10/19/11-4/20/12<br />

NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />

STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 X STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4 X<br />

3<br />

3<br />

4<br />

3<br />

4<br />

4<br />

1.<br />

2.<br />

3.<br />

4.<br />

5.<br />

6.<br />

STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />

ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />

EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />

ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />

TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />

QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

N/<br />

7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />

STUDENTS REALLY ENJOYED THIS WORKSHOP AND ARE ALWAYS<br />

EXCITED TO GET THEIR SOAP CREATIONS BACK.<br />

8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />

NONE<br />

9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />

THIS YEAR WE ADDED A SMART BOARD ACITIVITY TO THE<br />

BEGINNING TO ADD VISUAL SUPPORT.<br />

ARTIST: SUZANNE HALL-FRITSCH<br />

CONTRACT #: A8249<br />

TITLE OF PROGRAM: COSTUME DESIGNER FOR THE SHOW - THE<br />

DROWSY CHAPERONE<br />

TYPE OF PROGRAM: RESIDENCY<br />

DISTRICT/ SCHOOL:<br />

KATONAH/LEWISBORO/JOHN JAY MIDDLE SCHOOL<br />

# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />

# OF STUDENTS: 75 GRADE(S) 6-8<br />

DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE<br />

1/15-3/15/12<br />

NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />

STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 X STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />

1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />

1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />

1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />

2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />

3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />

4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />

5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />

6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />

7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />

LEARNING TO LOOK IS AN INTERACTIVE APPROACH TO ART<br />

HISTORY. IT TEACHES STUDENTS TO BREAK DOWN A WORK OF<br />

ART INTO ITS ESSENTIAL QUALITIES AND MAKES ANY WORK OF<br />

ART APPROACHABLE AND EXCITING.<br />

8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />

NONE<br />

9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />

AWESOME PROGRAM. THE STUDENTS REALLY LOVE IT.<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />

2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />

3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />

4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />

5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />

6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />

7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />

THE COSTUMES WERE OUTSTANDING.<br />

8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />

NONE<br />

9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />

NONE<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

N/<br />

Arts in Education Service - School Evaluations <strong>2011</strong>-<strong>2012</strong><br />

Page 297 of 332


ARTIST: SUZANNE HALL-FRITSCH<br />

CONTRACT #: A7641<br />

TITLE OF PROGRAM: COSTUME DESIGNER FOR THE SHOW - TWILIGHT<br />

ZONE<br />

TYPE OF PROGRAM: RESIDENCY<br />

DISTRICT/ SCHOOL: KATONAH/LEWISBORO/JOHN JAY MIDDLE SCHOOL<br />

# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />

# OF STUDENTS: 43 GRADE(S) 6-8<br />

DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 10/3-11/8/11<br />

NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />

STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 X STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />

ARTIST: TAMMY MARGARET BURGUS<br />

CONTRACT #: A7703<br />

TITLE OF PROGRAM: PRODUCER FOR THE FALL MUSICAL - ANNIE GET<br />

YOUR GUN<br />

TYPE OF PROGRAM: RESIDENCY<br />

DISTRICT/ SCHOOL: LAKELAND/WALTER PANAS HIGH SCHOOL<br />

# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />

# OF STUDENTS: 100 GRADE(S) 9-12<br />

DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 10/3-11/19/11<br />

NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />

STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 X STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />

1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />

1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />

1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />

2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />

3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />

4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />

5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />

6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />

2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />

3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />

4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />

5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />

6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM?<br />

SUZANNE ALWAYS DOES A SUPERB JOB.<br />

Y<br />

WHY?<br />

7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM?<br />

NONE<br />

Y<br />

WHY?<br />

8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />

NONE<br />

9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />

NONE<br />

8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />

NONE<br />

9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />

NONE<br />

ARTIST: TAMMY MARGARET BURGUS<br />

CONTRACT #: A8319<br />

TITLE OF PROGRAM: PRODUCER FOR THE FALL MUSICAL - MY FAIR LADY<br />

TYPE OF PROGRAM: RESIDENCY<br />

DISTRICT/ SCHOOL: LAKELAND/WALTER PANAS HIGH SCHOOL<br />

# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />

# OF STUDENTS: 200 GRADE(S) 9-12<br />

DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 2/21-5/5/12<br />

NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />

STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 X STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />

ARTIST: TAR BEACH DIGITAL, INC.<br />

CONTRACT #: A8138<br />

TITLE OF PROGRAM: LAUGHING PIZZA BAND<br />

TYPE OF PROGRAM: ASSEMBLY<br />

DISTRICT/ SCHOOL:<br />

# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />

ARDSLEY/CONCORD ROAD ELEM.<br />

# OF STUDENTS: 700 GRADE(S) K-4<br />

DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 12/12/11<br />

NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />

STANDARD 1 STANDARD 2 STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />

1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />

1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />

1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />

2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />

3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />

4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />

5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />

6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />

7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />

ALWAYS A PLEASURE.<br />

8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />

NONE<br />

9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />

NONE<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />

2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />

3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />

4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />

5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />

6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />

7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />

WHILE THIS WAS A FUN AND INTERACTIVE ASSEMBLY, THE<br />

EDUCATIONAL QUALITY NEEDED TO BE ENHANCED. FURTHER<br />

EMPHASIS ON THE WRITING PROCESS AND MORE FACE TIME WITH<br />

THE LIVE PERFORMERS.<br />

8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />

GREATER EMPHASIS ON HOW TO GENERATE IDEAS AND CREATE A<br />

SONG.<br />

9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />

THE STUDENTS TRULY ENJOYED THE PERFORMANCE.<br />

4<br />

3.5<br />

2<br />

3.5<br />

4<br />

N/<br />

Arts in Education Service - School Evaluations <strong>2011</strong>-<strong>2012</strong><br />

Page 298 of 332


ARTIST:<br />

TECHNICAL DIRECTIONS, LLC<br />

CONTRACT #: A8858<br />

TITLE OF PROGRAM: CLIFF BRUNO - LIGHTING & SOUND DESIGNER FOR<br />

OSSINING LIVE SHOW<br />

TYPE OF PROGRAM: RESIDENCY<br />

DISTRICT/ SCHOOL:<br />

OSSINING/OSSINING HIGH SCHOOL<br />

# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />

# OF STUDENTS: GRADE(S) 12<br />

DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE<br />

6/1/12<br />

NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />

STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 X STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />

1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />

1.<br />

2.<br />

3.<br />

4.<br />

5.<br />

6.<br />

STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />

ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />

EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />

ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />

TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />

QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />

CLIFF AND HIS CREW WORKED GREAT. THE CHILDREN LEARNED A<br />

LOT AND GOT TO SEE A DIFFERENT TYPE OF PRODUCTION STYLE.<br />

8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />

NONE<br />

9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />

NONE<br />

ARTIST: TECHNICAL DIRECTIONS, LLC<br />

CONTRACT #: A8495<br />

TITLE OF PROGRAM: CLIFF BRUNO - LIGHTING DESIGN MATTHEW<br />

RODRIGUEZ SOUND DESIGNER FOR SHOW - BEAUTY<br />

& THE BEAST JR.<br />

TYPE OF PROGRAM: RESIDENCY<br />

DISTRICT/ SCHOOL:<br />

CHAPPAQUA/WESTORCHARD ELEM.<br />

# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />

# OF STUDENTS: 105 GRADE(S) 2-4<br />

DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE<br />

4/23-29/12<br />

NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />

STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 X STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />

1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />

ARTIST: TECHNICAL DIRECTIONS, LLC<br />

CONTRACT #: A8187A<br />

TITLE OF PROGRAM: CLIFF BRUNO - LIGHTING DESIGN & MATTHEW<br />

RODRIQUEZ -SOUND DESIGNER FOR SHOW -<br />

BEAUTY AND THE BEAST<br />

TYPE OF PROGRAM: RESIDENCY<br />

DISTRICT/ SCHOOL:<br />

CHAPPAQUA/SEVEN BRIDGES MIDDLE SCHOOL<br />

# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />

# OF STUDENTS: GRADE(S) 5-8<br />

DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 1/30-2/12/12<br />

NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />

STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 X STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />

1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />

1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />

2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />

3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />

4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />

5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />

6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />

7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />

THEY PAID INDIVIDUAL ATTENTION TO EACH STUDENT WORKING<br />

TECH. ALL GOT HANDS ON EXPERIENCE.<br />

8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />

NONE<br />

9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />

NONE<br />

ARTIST: TECHNICAL DIRECTIONS, LLC<br />

CONTRACT #: A8586<br />

TITLE OF PROGRAM: CLIFF BRUNO - LIGHTING DESIGNER FOR THE<br />

SHOW - FOOTLOOSE<br />

TYPE OF PROGRAM: RESIDENCY<br />

DISTRICT/ SCHOOL:<br />

CHAPPAQUA/BELL MIDDLE SCHOOL<br />

# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />

# OF STUDENTS: GRADE(S) 5-8<br />

DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 3/14-25/12<br />

NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />

STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 X STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />

1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

1.<br />

2.<br />

3.<br />

4.<br />

5.<br />

6.<br />

STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />

ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />

EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />

ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />

TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />

QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

N/<br />

7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />

CLIFF AND THE ENTIRE STAFF WERE GREAT TO WORK WITH AND<br />

WERE TERRIFIC WITH THE STUDENTS. THE KIDS GAINED SO MUCH<br />

FROM INCORPORATIVE TECHNICAL EFFECTS INTO THIS THEATRE<br />

PROGRAM.<br />

8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />

NONE<br />

9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />

NONE<br />

1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />

2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />

3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />

4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />

5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />

6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />

7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />

GOOD PROGRAM.<br />

8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />

NONE<br />

9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />

NONE<br />

4<br />

4<br />

4<br />

4<br />

3<br />

N/<br />

Arts in Education Service - School Evaluations <strong>2011</strong>-<strong>2012</strong><br />

Page 299 of 332


ARTIST: TECHNICAL DIRECTIONS, LLC<br />

CONTRACT #: A8572<br />

TITLE OF PROGRAM: DEVON ALLEN - LIGHTING DESIGNER FOR THE<br />

SHOW - BEAUTY AND THE BEAST<br />

TYPE OF PROGRAM: RESIDENCY<br />

DISTRICT/ SCHOOL: PLEASANTVILLE/PLEASANTVILLE HIGH SCHOOL<br />

# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />

# OF STUDENTS: 1000 GRADE(S) 9-12<br />

DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 2/27-3/19/12<br />

NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />

STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 X STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4 X<br />

ARTIST: TECHNICAL DIRECTIONS, LLC<br />

CONTRACT #: A8596<br />

TITLE OF PROGRAM: JEFF MILLER - SOUND DESIGNER FOR THE SHOW -<br />

BEAUTY AND THE BEAST<br />

TYPE OF PROGRAM: RESIDENCY<br />

DISTRICT/ SCHOOL: PLEASANTVILLE/PLEASANTVILLE HIGH SCHOOL<br />

# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />

# OF STUDENTS: 1000 GRADE(S) 9-12<br />

DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 2/27-3/21/12<br />

NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />

STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 X STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />

1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />

1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />

1.<br />

2.<br />

3.<br />

4.<br />

5.<br />

6.<br />

STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />

ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />

EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />

ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />

TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />

QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />

WORKING WITH DEVON WAS A VALUABLE EXPERIENCE FOR OUT<br />

STUDENTS. THE ARTISTIC RESULT OF HIS WORK ENHANCES<br />

EVERY ASPECT OF THE PRODUCTION.<br />

8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />

NONE<br />

9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />

NONE<br />

ARTIST: TECHNICAL DIRECTIONS, LLC<br />

CONTRACT #: A8187B<br />

TITLE OF PROGRAM: PHIL BELGRAVE - SOUND DESIGNER FOR SHOW -<br />

SEUSSICAL JR.<br />

TYPE OF PROGRAM: RESIDENCY<br />

DISTRICT/ SCHOOL:<br />

CHAPPAQUA/SEVEN BRIDGES MIDDLE SCHOOL<br />

# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />

# OF STUDENTS: GRADE(S) 5-8<br />

DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE<br />

2/6-12/12<br />

NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />

STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 X STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />

1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />

1.<br />

2.<br />

3.<br />

4.<br />

5.<br />

6.<br />

STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />

ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />

EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />

ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />

TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />

QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />

KNOWLEDGEABLE AND CLEARLY EXPLAINED TECHNICAL ASPECTS.<br />

8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />

NONE<br />

9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />

NONE<br />

1.<br />

2.<br />

3.<br />

4.<br />

5.<br />

6.<br />

STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />

ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />

EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />

ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />

TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />

QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

N/<br />

7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />

HAVING A PROFESSIONAL SOUND DESIGNER WORK WITH THE<br />

STUDENTS TEACHES THEM SKILLS THEY CAN ONLY LEARN IN<br />

PRODUCTION AND FROM A PROFESSIONAL WITH THIS EXPERTISE.<br />

8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />

NONE<br />

9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />

NONE<br />

ARTIST: TECHNICAL DIRECTIONS, LLC<br />

CONTRACT #: A8850<br />

TITLE OF PROGRAM: R.J. THOMAS - LIGHTING DESIGNER - PHIL<br />

BELGRAVE - SOUND DESIGNER FOR THE SHOW -<br />

PETER PAN<br />

TYPE OF PROGRAM: RESIDENCY<br />

DISTRICT/ SCHOOL: CHAPPAQUA/ROARING BROOK ELEM.<br />

# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />

# OF STUDENTS: 113 GRADE(S) 2-4<br />

DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 5/21-6/3/12<br />

NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />

STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 X STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />

1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />

1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />

2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />

3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />

4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />

5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />

6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />

7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />

NONE<br />

8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />

NONE<br />

9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />

THEY DID A GREAT JOB THIS YEAR. THE SHOW WENT ON WITHOUT<br />

ANY PROBLEMS.<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

N/<br />

Arts in Education Service - School Evaluations <strong>2011</strong>-<strong>2012</strong><br />

Page 300 of 332


ARTIST: TESSA LIEBMAN<br />

CONTRACT #: A8602<br />

TITLE OF PROGRAM: PHOTOGRAPHY COMPOSITIONS / SUBJECT 'FOOD'<br />

TYPE OF PROGRAM: RESIDENCY<br />

DISTRICT/ SCHOOL: LAKELAND/COPPER BEECH MIDDLE SCHOOL<br />

# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />

# OF STUDENTS: 50 GRADE(S) 7<br />

DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 3/9-23/12<br />

NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />

STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 X STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />

ARTIST: THE AMERICAN SONGBOOK PROJECT CONTRACT #: A7971<br />

TITLE OF PROGRAM: GREAT AMERICAN SONGS<br />

TYPE OF PROGRAM: ASSEMBLY<br />

DISTRICT/ SCHOOL:<br />

# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />

TUCKAHOE/W. E. COTTLE ELEM.<br />

# OF STUDENTS: GRADE(S) K-8<br />

DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 11/22/11<br />

NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />

STANDARD 1 STANDARD 2 STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4 X<br />

1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />

1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />

1.<br />

2.<br />

3.<br />

4.<br />

5.<br />

6.<br />

STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />

ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />

EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />

ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />

TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />

QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

N/<br />

7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />

STUDENTS REALLY RESPONDED TO HER AND OBVIOUSLY<br />

ENJOYED WORKING WITH HER. THEY ARE VERY EXICTED TO SEE<br />

THEIR WORK IN PRINT.<br />

8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />

NONE<br />

9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />

NONE<br />

1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />

2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />

3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />

4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />

5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />

6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />

7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />

THEY ARE SIMPLY OUTSTANDING. TO HAVE THIS CALIBER OF<br />

TALENT IN OUR SCHOOL WAS INCREDIBLE.<br />

8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />

NONE<br />

9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />

NONE<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

ARTIST: THE CULMINATIONS GROUP<br />

CONTRACT #: A8746<br />

TITLE OF PROGRAM: HENRY CHAPIN - SQUARE DANCING<br />

TYPE OF PROGRAM: ASSEMBLY<br />

DISTRICT/ SCHOOL: DOBBS FERRY/SPRINGHURST ELEM.<br />

# OF TEACHERS: 6<br />

# OF STUDENTS: 120 GRADE(S) 2<br />

DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 6/13/12<br />

NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />

STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 STANDARD 3 STANDARD 4 X<br />

ARTIST: THE EMPTY VESSEL, INC<br />

CONTRACT #: A7619A<br />

TITLE OF PROGRAM: SARAH BAEHR - ADVANCED CLAY<br />

TYPE OF PROGRAM: WORKSHOP<br />

DISTRICT/ SCHOOL:<br />

# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />

PELHAM/HUTCHINSON ELEM.<br />

# OF STUDENTS: 7 GRADE(S) 3-5<br />

DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 10/12-11/23/11<br />

NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />

STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 X STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />

1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />

1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />

1.<br />

2.<br />

3.<br />

4.<br />

5.<br />

6.<br />

STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />

ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />

EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />

ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />

TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />

QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

N/<br />

7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />

THE CHILDREN LEARN A VARIETY OF DANCES AND FORMATIONS<br />

THROUGH CLEAR DIRECTIONS AND DEMONSTRATIONS. THE<br />

SONGS WERE AGE APPROPRIATE.<br />

8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />

NONE<br />

9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />

YOUNG AND OLD ALWAYS ENJOY THEMSELVES.<br />

1.<br />

2.<br />

3.<br />

4.<br />

5.<br />

6.<br />

STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />

ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />

EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />

ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />

TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />

QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />

SARAH IS A PLEASURE TO WORK WITH. SHE IS A SERIOUS ARTIST<br />

THAT LOVES SHARING HER CRAFT WITH HER STUDENTS. THE<br />

FINISHED PROJECTS ARE AMAZING.<br />

8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />

NONE<br />

9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />

NONE<br />

Arts in Education Service - School Evaluations <strong>2011</strong>-<strong>2012</strong><br />

Page 301 of 332


ARTIST: THE EMPTY VESSEL, INC.<br />

CONTRACT #: A8373A<br />

TITLE OF PROGRAM: SARAH BAEHR - ADVANCED CLAY<br />

TYPE OF PROGRAM: WORKSHOP<br />

DISTRICT/ SCHOOL:<br />

# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />

PELHAM/HUTCHINSON ELEM.<br />

# OF STUDENTS: 11 GRADE(S) 3-5<br />

DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 2/9-4/5/12<br />

NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />

STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 X STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />

ARTIST: THE EMPTY VESSEL, INC.<br />

CONTRACT #: A7619B<br />

TITLE OF PROGRAM: SARAH BAEHR - BEGINNING CLAY<br />

TYPE OF PROGRAM: WORKSHOP<br />

DISTRICT/ SCHOOL:<br />

# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />

PELHAM/HUTCHINSON ELEM.<br />

# OF STUDENTS: 8 GRADE(S) 3-5<br />

DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 10/14-12/9/11<br />

NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />

STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 X STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />

1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />

1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />

1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />

2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />

3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />

4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />

5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />

6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />

2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />

3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />

4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />

5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />

6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM?<br />

SARAH IS A PLEASURE TO WORK WITH.<br />

8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />

NONE<br />

9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />

NONE<br />

Y<br />

WHY?<br />

7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />

SARAH IS A PLEASURE TO WORK WITH. SHE HAS AN IMMENSE<br />

AMOUNT OF PATIENCE FOR HER STUDENTS. THE FINISHED<br />

PRODUCTS CONTINUE TO AMAZE PARENTS YEAR AFTER YEAR.<br />

8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />

NONE<br />

9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />

NONE<br />

ARTIST: THE EMPTY VESSEL, INC.<br />

CONTRACT #: A8373C<br />

TITLE OF PROGRAM: SARAH BAEHR - BEGINNING CLAY<br />

TYPE OF PROGRAM: WORKSHOP<br />

DISTRICT/ SCHOOL:<br />

# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />

PELHAM/HUTCHINSON ELEM.<br />

# OF STUDENTS: 8 GRADE(S) 3-5<br />

DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 2/14-4/3/12<br />

NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />

STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 X STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />

ARTIST: THE EMPTY VESSEL, INC.<br />

CONTRACT #: A7661<br />

TITLE OF PROGRAM: SARAH BAEHR - CLAY SCULPTING<br />

TYPE OF PROGRAM: WORKSHOP<br />

DISTRICT/ SCHOOL: EASTCHESTER/GREENVALE ELEM.<br />

# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />

# OF STUDENTS: 10 GRADE(S) 4 & 5<br />

DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 10/19-12/14/11<br />

NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />

STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 X STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />

1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />

1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />

1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />

2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />

3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />

4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />

5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />

6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />

7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />

SARAH IS A PLEASURE TO WORK WITH. SHE IS EXTREMELY<br />

ENTHUSIASTIC AND THE STUDENTS LOVE WORKING WITH HER.<br />

8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />

NONE<br />

9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />

NONE<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

1.<br />

2.<br />

3.<br />

4.<br />

5.<br />

6.<br />

STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />

ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />

EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />

ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />

TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />

QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

N/<br />

7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />

CAN'T WAIT TO HAVE HER BACK TO TEACH MORE CLASSES. THE<br />

STUDENTS REALLY RESPOND TO HER INSTRUCTION AND THE<br />

QUALITY OF THEIR WORK IS AMAZING.<br />

8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />

NONE<br />

9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />

NONE<br />

Arts in Education Service - School Evaluations <strong>2011</strong>-<strong>2012</strong><br />

Page 302 of 332


ARTIST: THE EMPTY VESSEL, INC.<br />

CONTRACT #: A8608A<br />

TITLE OF PROGRAM: SARAH BAEHR - CLAY SCULPTING I<br />

TYPE OF PROGRAM: WORKSHOP<br />

DISTRICT/ SCHOOL: EASTCHESTER/GREENVALE ELEM.<br />

# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />

# OF STUDENTS: 12 GRADE(S) 2 & 3<br />

DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 3/13-5/8/12<br />

NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />

STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 X STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />

ARTIST: THE EMPTY VESSEL, INC.<br />

CONTRACT #: A8608B<br />

TITLE OF PROGRAM: SARAH BAEHR - CLAY SCULPTING II<br />

TYPE OF PROGRAM: WORKSHOP<br />

DISTRICT/ SCHOOL: EASTCHESTER/GREENVALE ELEM.<br />

# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />

# OF STUDENTS: 10 GRADE(S) 3-5<br />

DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 3/14-5/9/12<br />

NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />

STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 X STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />

1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />

1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />

1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />

2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />

3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />

4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />

5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />

6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

N/<br />

1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />

2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />

3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />

4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />

5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />

6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

N/<br />

7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM?<br />

SIMPLY WONDERFUL.<br />

Y<br />

WHY?<br />

7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM?<br />

SIMPLY WONDERFUL.<br />

Y<br />

WHY?<br />

8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />

NONE<br />

9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />

NONE<br />

8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />

NONE<br />

9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />

NONE<br />

ARTIST: THE EMPTY VESSEL, INC.<br />

CONTRACT #: A8373B<br />

TITLE OF PROGRAM: SARAH BAEHR - SCULPEY ANIMALS<br />

TYPE OF PROGRAM: WORKSHOP<br />

DISTRICT/ SCHOOL:<br />

# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />

PELHAM/HUTCHINSON ELEM.<br />

# OF STUDENTS: 9 GRADE(S) 5<br />

DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 2/9-4/5/12<br />

NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />

STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 X STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />

ARTIST: THE HOBBY QUEST<br />

CONTRACT #: A8092<br />

TITLE OF PROGRAM: ALEX DAVIDSON - MAGIC<br />

TYPE OF PROGRAM: WORKSHOP<br />

DISTRICT/ SCHOOL:<br />

# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />

CHAPPAQUA/GRAFFLIN ELEM.<br />

# OF STUDENTS: 12 GRADE(S) K-2<br />

DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 3/9-12/12<br />

NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />

STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 X STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />

1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />

1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />

1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />

2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />

3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />

4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />

5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />

6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />

7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />

SARAH IS A PLEASURE TO WORK WITH. HER ENTHUSIASM FOR<br />

THE PROGRAM IS EXCEPTIONAL.<br />

8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />

NONE<br />

9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />

NONE<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

1.<br />

2.<br />

3.<br />

4.<br />

5.<br />

6.<br />

STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />

ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />

EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />

ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />

TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />

QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />

4<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />

INCREDIBLE INSTRUCTOR. WOULD LOVE TO HAVE HIM BACK. THE<br />

STUDENTS REALLY ENJOYED HIS INSTRUCTION.<br />

8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />

NONE<br />

9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />

NONE<br />

Arts in Education Service - School Evaluations <strong>2011</strong>-<strong>2012</strong><br />

Page 303 of 332


ARTIST: THE HOBBY QUEST<br />

CONTRACT #: A8607<br />

TITLE OF PROGRAM: CAITLIN TURNER & MARCELLA CLARK - PROJECT<br />

RUNWAY / FASHION DESIGN<br />

TYPE OF PROGRAM: WORKSHOP<br />

DISTRICT/ SCHOOL: EASTCHESTER/GREENVALE ELEM.<br />

# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />

# OF STUDENTS: 14 GRADE(S) 2-5<br />

DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 3/14-5/9/12<br />

NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />

STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 X STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />

1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />

ARTIST: THE HOBBY QUEST<br />

CONTRACT #: A8282<br />

TITLE OF PROGRAM: MIRANDA AMITRANO - FASHION DESIGNING<br />

TYPE OF PROGRAM: WORKSHOP<br />

DISTRICT/ SCHOOL: KATONAH/LEWISBORO/KATONAH ELEM. SCHOOL<br />

# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />

# OF STUDENTS: 10 GRADE(S) 3-5<br />

DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 1/23-3/19/12<br />

NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />

STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 X STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />

1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />

1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />

2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />

3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />

4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />

5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />

6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />

7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />

NONE<br />

8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />

NONE<br />

9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />

NONE<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

N/<br />

1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />

2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />

3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />

4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />

5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />

6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />

7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />

PROFESSIONAL ORGANIZATION. INTERESTING CLASS WHICH<br />

ENGAGED THE STUDENTS.<br />

8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />

NONE<br />

9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />

NONE<br />

3<br />

3<br />

3<br />

3<br />

3<br />

3<br />

ARTIST: THE MUSIC PATH CO., INC<br />

CONTRACT #: A8593<br />

TITLE OF PROGRAM: MARY ELLEN MCCABE - READING MUSIC & PLAYING<br />

TUNES<br />

TYPE OF PROGRAM: WORKSHOP<br />

DISTRICT/ SCHOOL: EASTCHESTER/WAVERLY EARLY CHILDHOOD CTR<br />

# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />

# OF STUDENTS: 8 GRADE(S) K<br />

DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 3/12-5/7/12<br />

NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />

STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 X STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />

ARTIST: THE MUSIC PATH CO., INC.<br />

CONTRACT #: A7747<br />

TITLE OF PROGRAM: MARY ELLEN MCCABE - READING MUSIC & PLAYING<br />

TUNES<br />

TYPE OF PROGRAM: WORKSHOP<br />

DISTRICT/ SCHOOL: EASTCHESTER/WAVERLY EARLY CHILDHOOD CTR<br />

# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />

# OF STUDENTS: 7 GRADE(S) 1<br />

DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 10/13-12/8/11<br />

NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />

STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 X STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />

1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />

1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />

1.<br />

2.<br />

3.<br />

4.<br />

5.<br />

6.<br />

STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />

ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />

EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />

ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />

TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />

QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />

MUSIC START BALANCES FUN AND DEVELOPMENT OF SKILLS AND<br />

TEACHES THE CHILDREN STEP BY STEP HOW TO PLAY THE<br />

KEYBOARD.<br />

8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />

NONE<br />

9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />

NONE<br />

1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />

2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />

3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />

4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />

5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />

6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />

7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />

THE TEACHER WAS VERY HANDS-ON WITH THE CHILDREN. HE<br />

MAKED MUSIC INTERESTING AND FUN.<br />

8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />

NONE<br />

9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />

THE CHILDREN ENJOYED THE CLASS AND WE WILL ASK HIM BACK.<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

Arts in Education Service - School Evaluations <strong>2011</strong>-<strong>2012</strong><br />

Page 304 of 332


ARTIST: THE NATIVE AMERICAN INTERTRIBAL D<br />

CONTRACT #: A8015<br />

TITLE OF PROGRAM: ROBERT (LITTLE HAWK) MARTIN - NATIVE AMERICAN<br />

DANCES<br />

TYPE OF PROGRAM: ASSEMBLY<br />

DISTRICT/ SCHOOL: TARRYTOWN/JOHN PAULDING ELEM.<br />

# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />

# OF STUDENTS: GRADE(S) K<br />

DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 11/17/11<br />

NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />

STANDARD 1 STANDARD 2 STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4 X<br />

ARTIST: THE NATIVE AMERICAN INTERTRIBAL D CONTRACT #: A7636<br />

TITLE OF PROGRAM: ROBERT (LITTLE HAWK) MARTIN - NATIVE AMERICAN<br />

DANCES<br />

TYPE OF PROGRAM: ASSEMBLY<br />

DISTRICT/ SCHOOL: PLEASANTVILLE/PLEASANTVILLE MIDDLE SCHOOL<br />

# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />

# OF STUDENTS: 154 GRADE(S) 7<br />

DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 9/21-23/11<br />

NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />

STANDARD 1 STANDARD 2 STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4 X<br />

1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />

1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />

1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />

2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />

3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />

4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />

5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />

6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

N/<br />

1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />

2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />

3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />

4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />

5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />

6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM?<br />

NONE<br />

Y<br />

WHY?<br />

7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />

THE STUDENTS WERE ENGAGED AND ENJOYED THE ACTIVELY.<br />

8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />

WE WOULD LOVE A LIST OF THE WORDS HE TEACHES THE<br />

CHILDREN TO REFERENCE AFTER THE PERFORMANCE.<br />

9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />

NONE<br />

8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />

NONE<br />

9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />

KEEP UP THE GREAT WORK.<br />

ARTIST: THE PUPPET PEOPLE<br />

CONTRACT #: A7877<br />

TITLE OF PROGRAM: MARK CARRIGAN - BULLY BUSTERS PUPPET SHOW<br />

TYPE OF PROGRAM: ASSEMBLY<br />

DISTRICT/ SCHOOL: BREWSTER/GARDEN STREET ELEM.<br />

# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />

# OF STUDENTS: GRADE(S) K-3<br />

DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 10/27/11<br />

NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />

STANDARD 1 STANDARD 2 STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />

ARTIST: THE PUPPET PEOPLE<br />

CONTRACT #: A7669<br />

TITLE OF PROGRAM: MARK CARRIGAN - BULLY BUSTERS PUPPET SHOW<br />

TYPE OF PROGRAM: ASSEMBLY<br />

DISTRICT/ SCHOOL:<br />

# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />

BREWSTER/JFK ELEM.<br />

# OF STUDENTS: GRADE(S) K-3<br />

DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 10/26/11<br />

NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />

STANDARD 1 STANDARD 2 STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />

1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />

1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />

1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />

2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />

3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />

4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />

5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />

6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />

5<br />

4<br />

5<br />

4<br />

4<br />

5<br />

1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />

2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />

3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />

4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />

5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />

6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />

STUDENTS WERE ENGAGED THROUGHOUT THE WHOLE<br />

PERFORMANCE. TAUGHT A GOOD LESSON IN WAYS THAT<br />

CHILDREN COULD UNDERSTAND.<br />

8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />

NONE<br />

9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />

NONE<br />

7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />

GREAT SHOW, NOT TOO LONG. THE CHILDREN LOVED IT.<br />

8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />

NONE<br />

9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />

NONE<br />

Arts in Education Service - School Evaluations <strong>2011</strong>-<strong>2012</strong><br />

Page 305 of 332


ARTIST: THEATRE FOR A NEW AUDIENCE CONTRACT #: A8476<br />

TITLE OF PROGRAM: MELISSA HOUSE - WORLD THEATRE PROJECT<br />

RESIDENCY<br />

TYPE OF PROGRAM: RESIDENCY<br />

DISTRICT/ SCHOOL: IRVINGTON/IRVINGTON HIGH SCHOOL<br />

# OF TEACHERS: 2<br />

# OF STUDENTS: 120 GRADE(S) 10-12<br />

DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 2/29-4/18/12<br />

NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />

STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 X STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />

1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />

ARTIST: THEATREWORKS, USA<br />

CONTRACT #: A8303<br />

TITLE OF PROGRAM: COLOR OF JUSTICE<br />

TYPE OF PROGRAM: ASSEMBLY<br />

DISTRICT/ SCHOOL: SOMERS/SOMERS INTERMEDIATE SCHOOL<br />

# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />

# OF STUDENTS: 200 GRADE(S) 5<br />

DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 1/19/12<br />

NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />

STANDARD 1 STANDARD 2 STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4 X<br />

1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />

1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />

2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />

3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />

4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />

5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />

6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />

7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />

VERY WELL RECEIVED. I LOVED IT.<br />

8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />

NONE<br />

9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />

NONE<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />

2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />

3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />

4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />

5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />

6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />

7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />

NONE<br />

8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />

NONE<br />

9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />

NONE<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

4<br />

5<br />

ARTIST: THEATREWORKS, USA<br />

CONTRACT #: A8626B<br />

TITLE OF PROGRAM: DUCK FOR PRESIDENT SHOW<br />

TYPE OF PROGRAM: ASSEMBLY<br />

DISTRICT/ SCHOOL: NEW ROCHELLE/TRINITY ELEM. SCHOOL<br />

# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />

# OF STUDENTS: 450 GRADE(S) K-2<br />

DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 6/12/12<br />

NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />

STANDARD 1 STANDARD 2 STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />

ARTIST: THEATREWORKS, USA<br />

CONTRACT #: A7676<br />

TITLE OF PROGRAM: FANCY NANCY & OTHER STORIES<br />

TYPE OF PROGRAM: ASSEMBLY<br />

DISTRICT/ SCHOOL:<br />

# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />

SOMERS/PRIMROSE ELEM.<br />

# OF STUDENTS: 700 GRADE(S) K-2<br />

DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 5/27/12<br />

NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />

STANDARD 1 STANDARD 2 STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />

1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />

1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />

1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />

2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />

3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />

4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />

5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />

6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

N/<br />

1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />

2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />

3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />

4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />

5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />

6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />

5<br />

5<br />

4<br />

4<br />

5<br />

N/<br />

7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM?<br />

NONE<br />

Y<br />

WHY?<br />

7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM?<br />

WE LOVE THIS PROGRAM.<br />

Y<br />

WHY?<br />

8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />

NONE<br />

9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />

NONE<br />

8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />

NONE<br />

9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />

NONE<br />

Arts in Education Service - School Evaluations <strong>2011</strong>-<strong>2012</strong><br />

Page 306 of 332


ARTIST: THEATREWORKS, USA<br />

CONTRACT #: A8410<br />

TITLE OF PROGRAM: FELIX PITRE - STORIES & SONGS OF LATIN AMERICA<br />

TYPE OF PROGRAM: ASSEMBLY<br />

DISTRICT/ SCHOOL: NEW ROCHELLE/WARD ELEM. SCHOOL<br />

# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />

# OF STUDENTS: GRADE(S) 1-4<br />

DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 5/3/12<br />

NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />

STANDARD 1 STANDARD 2 STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4 X<br />

ARTIST: THEATREWORKS, USA<br />

CONTRACT #: A7763<br />

TITLE OF PROGRAM: FELIX PITRE - STORIES & SONGS OF LATIN AMERICA<br />

TYPE OF PROGRAM: ASSEMBLY<br />

DISTRICT/ SCHOOL:<br />

# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />

OSSINING/BROOKSIDE ELEM.<br />

# OF STUDENTS: 720 GRADE(S) 1 & 2<br />

DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 10/24/11<br />

NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />

STANDARD 1 STANDARD 2 STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4 X<br />

1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />

1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />

1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />

2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />

3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />

4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />

5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />

6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />

2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />

3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />

4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />

5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />

6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />

EXCELLENT PROGRAM. FELIX COMPLETELY CONNECTED WITH<br />

THE CHILDREN.<br />

8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />

NONE<br />

9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />

NONE<br />

7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM?<br />

NONE<br />

8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />

NONE<br />

9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />

NONE<br />

Y<br />

WHY?<br />

ARTIST: THEATREWORKS, USA<br />

CONTRACT #: A8796<br />

TITLE OF PROGRAM: FELIX PITRE - STORIES & SONGS OF LATIN AMERICA<br />

TYPE OF PROGRAM: ASSEMBLY<br />

DISTRICT/ SCHOOL:<br />

# OF TEACHERS: 10<br />

BRIARCLIFF/TODD ELEM.<br />

# OF STUDENTS: 112 GRADE(S) 5<br />

DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 5/31/12<br />

NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />

STANDARD 1 STANDARD 2 STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4 X<br />

ARTIST: THEATREWORKS, USA<br />

CONTRACT #: A8296<br />

TITLE OF PROGRAM: FELIX PITRE - STORIES & SONGS OF LATIN AMERICA<br />

TYPE OF PROGRAM: ASSEMBLY<br />

DISTRICT/ SCHOOL:<br />

# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />

CARMEL/PATERSON ELEM.<br />

# OF STUDENTS: 500 GRADE(S) K-4<br />

DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 1/30/12<br />

NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />

STANDARD 1 STANDARD 2 STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4 X<br />

1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />

1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />

1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />

2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />

3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />

4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />

5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />

6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />

2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />

3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />

4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />

5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />

6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

N/<br />

7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />

FELIX IS WONDERFUL AT ENGAGING STUDENTS WHILE GIVING<br />

THEM AN APPRECIATION OF A DIFFERENT CULTURE.<br />

8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />

NONE<br />

9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />

WE LOOK FORWARD TO HIS VISIT EVERY YEAR.<br />

7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />

VERY ENGAGING WITH MUSIC, STORY TELLING, PUPPETRY AND<br />

VENTRILOQUIST.<br />

8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />

NONE<br />

9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />

GOOD FEEDBACK.<br />

Arts in Education Service - School Evaluations <strong>2011</strong>-<strong>2012</strong><br />

Page 307 of 332


ARTIST: THEATREWORKS, USA<br />

CONTRACT #: A7522<br />

TITLE OF PROGRAM: JUNIE B. JONES<br />

TYPE OF PROGRAM: ASSEMBLY<br />

DISTRICT/ SCHOOL: CHAPPAQUA/ROARING BROOK ELEM.<br />

# OF TEACHERS: 5<br />

# OF STUDENTS: 300 GRADE(S) K-2<br />

DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 6/6/12<br />

NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />

STANDARD 1 STANDARD 2 STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />

ARTIST: THEATREWORKS, USA<br />

CONTRACT #: A8087A<br />

TITLE OF PROGRAM: LEWIS & CLARK SHOW<br />

TYPE OF PROGRAM: ASSEMBLY<br />

DISTRICT/ SCHOOL: NEW ROCHELLE/WARD ELEM. SCHOOL<br />

# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />

# OF STUDENTS: GRADE(S) 4 & 5<br />

DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 3/6/12<br />

NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />

STANDARD 1 STANDARD 2 STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />

1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />

1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />

1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />

2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />

3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />

4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />

5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />

6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

N/<br />

5<br />

N/<br />

1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />

2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />

3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />

4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />

5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />

6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />

IT WAS VERY WELL DONE AND ALL STUDENTS, FACILITY,<br />

TEACHERS, ETC. ENJOYED IT.<br />

8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />

IT WAS A LITTLE LONG FOR THE YOUNGER AUDIENCE.<br />

9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />

IT WAS A GREAT SHOW.<br />

7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM?<br />

NONE<br />

8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />

NONE<br />

9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />

NONE<br />

Y<br />

WHY?<br />

ARTIST: THEATREWORKS, USA<br />

CONTRACT #: A7994A<br />

TITLE OF PROGRAM: NATE THE GREAT SHOW<br />

TYPE OF PROGRAM: ASSEMBLY<br />

DISTRICT/ SCHOOL:<br />

# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />

CHAPPAQUA/GRAFFLIN ELEM.<br />

# OF STUDENTS: 75 GRADE(S) K-2<br />

DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 2/10/12<br />

NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />

STANDARD 1 STANDARD 2 STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />

ARTIST: THEATREWORKS, USA<br />

CONTRACT #: A7688<br />

TITLE OF PROGRAM: PATRICK GARNER - AMERICAN TALL TALES<br />

TYPE OF PROGRAM: ASSEMBLY<br />

DISTRICT/ SCHOOL: PUTNAM VALLEY/PUTNAM VALLEY ELEM.<br />

# OF TEACHERS: 5<br />

# OF STUDENTS: 125 GRADE(S) 3<br />

DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 3/14/12<br />

NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />

STANDARD 1 STANDARD 2 STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4 X<br />

1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />

1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />

1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />

2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />

3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />

4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />

5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />

6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />

4<br />

4<br />

3<br />

4<br />

4<br />

N/<br />

1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />

2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />

3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />

4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />

5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />

6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM?<br />

DELIGHTFUL, AGE APPROPRIATE.<br />

8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />

NONE<br />

9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />

NONE<br />

Y<br />

WHY?<br />

7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />

THIS ASSEMBLY FIT IN PERFECTLY WITH OUR 3RD GRADE<br />

CURRICULUM. PROGRAM WAS WELL DONE AND ENGAGING.<br />

8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />

NONE<br />

9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />

NONE<br />

Arts in Education Service - School Evaluations <strong>2011</strong>-<strong>2012</strong><br />

Page 308 of 332


ARTIST: THEATREWORKS, USA<br />

CONTRACT #: A7999<br />

TITLE OF PROGRAM: QUEEN NUR SWEET POTATO PIE & SUCH<br />

TYPE OF PROGRAM: ASSEMBLY<br />

DISTRICT/ SCHOOL:<br />

# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />

OSSINING/BROOKSIDE ELEM.<br />

# OF STUDENTS: 700 GRADE(S) 2 & 3<br />

DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 1/23/12<br />

NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />

STANDARD 1 STANDARD 2 STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4 X<br />

1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />

ARTIST: THEATREWORKS, USA<br />

CONTRACT #: A7997<br />

TITLE OF PROGRAM: QUEEN NUR SWEET POTATO PIE & SUCH & VOICES<br />

OF COURAGE<br />

TYPE OF PROGRAM: ASSEMBLY<br />

DISTRICT/ SCHOOL: NEW ROCHELLE/WARD ELEM. SCHOOL<br />

# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />

# OF STUDENTS: 1100 GRADE(S) K-5<br />

DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 2/7/12<br />

NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />

STANDARD 1 STANDARD 2 STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4 X<br />

1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />

1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />

2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />

3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />

4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />

5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />

6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />

7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />

CHILDREN LOVED IT.<br />

8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />

NONE<br />

9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />

NONE<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />

2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />

3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />

4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />

5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />

6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />

7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />

NONE<br />

8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />

NONE<br />

9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />

NONE<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

ARTIST: THEATREWORKS, USA<br />

CONTRACT #: A8144<br />

TITLE OF PROGRAM: RAMONA QUIMBY<br />

TYPE OF PROGRAM: ASSEMBLY<br />

DISTRICT/ SCHOOL: LAKELAND/BENJAMIN FRANKLIN ELEM.<br />

# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />

# OF STUDENTS: 275 GRADE(S) K-2<br />

DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 12/14/11<br />

NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />

STANDARD 1 STANDARD 2 STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />

ARTIST: THEATREWORKS, USA<br />

CONTRACT #: A8070B<br />

TITLE OF PROGRAM: RAMONA QUIMBY<br />

TYPE OF PROGRAM: ASSEMBLY<br />

DISTRICT/ SCHOOL: SOMERS/SOMERS INTERMEDIATE SCHOOL<br />

# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />

# OF STUDENTS: 268 GRADE(S) 3<br />

DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 5/29/12<br />

NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />

STANDARD 1 STANDARD 2 STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />

1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />

1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />

1.<br />

2.<br />

3.<br />

4.<br />

5.<br />

6.<br />

STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />

ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />

EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />

ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />

TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />

QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />

2<br />

1<br />

2<br />

2<br />

3<br />

N/<br />

7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? N WHY?<br />

WE WERE VERY EXCITED TO HAVE THIS SHOW. THE RAMONA<br />

SERIES IS A CLASSIC. HOWEVER, WE WERE DISAPPOINTED WITH<br />

THE LANGUAGE AND BULLYING REFERENCES. THE FATHER<br />

SMOKING AND THE TONE OF THE SHOW. OUR PRINCIPAL NEEDED<br />

TO CUT THE SHOW SHORT.<br />

8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />

NONE<br />

9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />

NONE<br />

1.<br />

2.<br />

3.<br />

4.<br />

5.<br />

6.<br />

STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />

ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />

EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />

ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />

TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />

QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />

THEY WERE AGE APPROPRIATE AND HELD THE ATTENTION OF THE<br />

STUDENTS<br />

8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />

NONE<br />

9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />

WE WILL CONTINUE TO BOOK THEM IN THE FUTURE.<br />

Arts in Education Service - School Evaluations <strong>2011</strong>-<strong>2012</strong><br />

Page 309 of 332


ARTIST: THEATREWORKS, USA<br />

CONTRACT #: A7690A<br />

TITLE OF PROGRAM: RETUMBA - JOURNEY THRU THE CARRIBBEAN ALL<br />

WOMEN SHOW<br />

TYPE OF PROGRAM: ASSEMBLY<br />

DISTRICT/ SCHOOL: NEW ROCHELLE/BARNARD EARLY CHILDHOOD CENT<br />

# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />

# OF STUDENTS: GRADE(S) PRE K-2<br />

DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 10/5/11<br />

NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />

STANDARD 1 STANDARD 2 STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4 X<br />

1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />

ARTIST: THEATREWORKS, USA<br />

CONTRACT #: A7690D<br />

TITLE OF PROGRAM: SEUSSICAL THE MUSICAL<br />

TYPE OF PROGRAM: ASSEMBLY<br />

DISTRICT/ SCHOOL: NEW ROCHELLE/BARNARD EARLY CHILDHOOD CENT<br />

# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />

# OF STUDENTS: 640 GRADE(S) PRE K-2<br />

DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 4/30/12<br />

NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />

STANDARD 1 STANDARD 2 STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />

1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />

1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />

2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />

3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />

4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />

5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />

6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />

7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />

EXCELLENT AS ALWAYS.<br />

8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />

NONE<br />

9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />

NONE<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />

2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />

3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />

4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />

5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />

6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />

7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />

THEY ARE EXTREMELY PROFESIONAL AND PROVIDE AN<br />

EXCELLENT SHOW FOR THE STUDENTS.<br />

8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />

NONE<br />

9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />

NONE<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

ARTIST: THEATREWORKS, USA<br />

CONTRACT #: A8589<br />

TITLE OF PROGRAM: SEUSSICAL THE MUSICAL<br />

TYPE OF PROGRAM: ASSEMBLY<br />

DISTRICT/ SCHOOL:<br />

# OF TEACHERS: 8<br />

TARRYTOWN/MORSE ELEM.<br />

# OF STUDENTS: 208 GRADE(S) 2<br />

DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 4/19/12<br />

NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />

STANDARD 1 STANDARD 2 STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />

ARTIST: THEATREWORKS, USA<br />

CONTRACT #: A7601<br />

TITLE OF PROGRAM: SEUSSICAL THE MUSICAL<br />

TYPE OF PROGRAM: ASSEMBLY<br />

DISTRICT/ SCHOOL: KATONAH/LEWISBORO/ALL ELEM. SCHOOLS<br />

# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />

# OF STUDENTS: 200 GRADE(S) 1-6<br />

DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 11/26/11<br />

NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />

STANDARD 1 STANDARD 2 STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />

1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />

1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />

1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />

2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />

3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />

4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />

5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />

6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />

7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />

WHAT A WONDERFUL INTRODUCTION TO MUSICAL SHOWS.<br />

8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />

NONE<br />

9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />

NONE<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

N/<br />

5<br />

5<br />

1.<br />

2.<br />

3.<br />

4.<br />

5.<br />

6.<br />

STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />

ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />

EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />

ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />

TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />

QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />

THE ACTORS WERE TALENTED, SPIRITED AND ENGAGED OUR<br />

STUDENTS IN A MEANINGFUL WAY. THE STUDENTS LOVED THE<br />

PERFORMANCE AND GAVE A SPONTANEOUS STANDING OVATION.<br />

8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />

NONE<br />

9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />

THANK YOU.<br />

Arts in Education Service - School Evaluations <strong>2011</strong>-<strong>2012</strong><br />

Page 310 of 332


ARTIST: THEATREWORKS, USA<br />

CONTRACT #: A8626A<br />

TITLE OF PROGRAM: THOMAS EDISON SHOW<br />

TYPE OF PROGRAM: ASSEMBLY<br />

DISTRICT/ SCHOOL: NEW ROCHELLE/TRINITY ELEM. SCHOOL<br />

# OF TEACHERS: 3<br />

# OF STUDENTS: 450 GRADE(S) 3-5<br />

DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 5/3/12<br />

NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />

STANDARD 1 STANDARD 2 STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />

ARTIST: THEATREWORKS, USA<br />

CONTRACT #: A7994B<br />

TITLE OF PROGRAM: WE THE PEOPLE<br />

TYPE OF PROGRAM: ASSEMBLY<br />

DISTRICT/ SCHOOL:<br />

# OF TEACHERS: 5<br />

CHAPPAQUA/GRAFFLIN ELEM.<br />

# OF STUDENTS: 105 GRADE(S) 3 & 4<br />

DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 3/26/12<br />

NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />

STANDARD 1 STANDARD 2 STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />

1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />

1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />

1.<br />

2.<br />

3.<br />

4.<br />

5.<br />

6.<br />

STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />

ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />

EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />

ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />

TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />

QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />

THIS PERFORMANCE NOT ONLY TAUGHT HISTORY AND SCIENCE IN<br />

AN ENTERTAINING WAY, IT REINFORCED THE VALUE OF HARD<br />

WORK AND PROBLEM SOLVING.<br />

8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />

NONE<br />

9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />

NONE<br />

1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />

2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />

3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />

4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />

5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />

6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />

7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? N WHY?<br />

TOO MUCH INFORMATION FOR 3RD AND 4TH GRADE.<br />

8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />

NONE<br />

9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />

MAY BE MORE APPROPRIATE FOR MIDDLE SCHOOL.<br />

3<br />

4<br />

N/<br />

2<br />

3<br />

3<br />

ARTIST: THEATREWORKS, USA<br />

CONTRACT #: A8070A<br />

TITLE OF PROGRAM: WE THE PEOPLE<br />

TYPE OF PROGRAM: ASSEMBLY<br />

DISTRICT/ SCHOOL: SOMERS/SOMERS INTERMEDIATE SCHOOL<br />

# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />

# OF STUDENTS: GRADE(S) 4<br />

DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 3/7/12<br />

NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />

STANDARD 1 STANDARD 2 STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />

ARTIST: THEATREWORKS, USA<br />

CONTRACT #: A8087B<br />

TITLE OF PROGRAM: WE THE PEOPLE<br />

TYPE OF PROGRAM: ASSEMBLY<br />

DISTRICT/ SCHOOL: NEW ROCHELLE/WARD ELEM. SCHOOL<br />

# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />

# OF STUDENTS: GRADE(S) 4 & 5<br />

DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 5/14/12<br />

NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />

STANDARD 1 STANDARD 2 STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />

1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />

1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />

1.<br />

2.<br />

3.<br />

4.<br />

5.<br />

6.<br />

STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />

ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />

EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />

ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />

TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />

QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

N/<br />

5<br />

4<br />

7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />

VERY EDUCATIONAL, LOTS OF INFORMATION GIVEN TO STUDENTS.<br />

8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />

NONE<br />

9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />

NONE<br />

1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />

2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />

3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />

4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />

5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />

6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />

7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />

THE SHOW WAS RIGHT IN LINE WITH OUR CURRICULUM.<br />

8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />

NONE<br />

9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />

NONE<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

N/<br />

Arts in Education Service - School Evaluations <strong>2011</strong>-<strong>2012</strong><br />

Page 311 of 332


ARTIST: THEATREWORKS, USA<br />

CONTRACT #: A7565<br />

TITLE OF PROGRAM: WE THE PEOPLE<br />

TYPE OF PROGRAM: ASSEMBLY<br />

DISTRICT/ SCHOOL: EASTCHESTER/GREENVALE ELEM.<br />

# OF TEACHERS: 11 # OF STUDENTS: 238 GRADE(S) 4 & 5<br />

DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 12/2/11<br />

NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />

STANDARD 1 STANDARD 2 STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />

ARTIST: THEATREWORKS, USA<br />

CONTRACT #: A8388<br />

TITLE OF PROGRAM: WE THE PEOPLE<br />

TYPE OF PROGRAM: ASSEMBLY<br />

DISTRICT/ SCHOOL: EASTCHESTER/ANNE HUTCHINSON ELEM.<br />

# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />

# OF STUDENTS: 22 GRADE(S) 4<br />

DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 3/27/12<br />

NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />

STANDARD 1 STANDARD 2 STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />

1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />

1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />

1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />

2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />

3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />

4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />

5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />

6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />

7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />

IT WAS EXTREMELY EDUCATIONAL IN AN ENTERTAINING WAY.<br />

8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />

NONE<br />

9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />

NONE<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

1.<br />

2.<br />

3.<br />

4.<br />

5.<br />

6.<br />

STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />

ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />

EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />

ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />

TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />

QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />

ALL STUDENTS WERE ENGAGED AND THE CONTENT WAS PERFECT.<br />

8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />

SOUND SYSTEM COULD BE A LITTLE BETTER.<br />

9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />

THIS ASSEMBLY WAS GREAT.<br />

ARTIST: THEATREWORKS, USA<br />

CONTRACT #: A7690C<br />

TITLE OF PROGRAM: YARINA<br />

TYPE OF PROGRAM: ASSEMBLY<br />

DISTRICT/ SCHOOL: NEW ROCHELLE/BARNARD EARLY CHILDHOOD CENT<br />

# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />

# OF STUDENTS: GRADE(S) PRE K-2<br />

DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 1/11/12<br />

NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />

STANDARD 1 STANDARD 2 STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4 X<br />

ARTIST: THEATREWORKS, USA<br />

CONTRACT #: A7690B<br />

TITLE OF PROGRAM: YELLOW BRICK ROAD<br />

TYPE OF PROGRAM: ASSEMBLY<br />

DISTRICT/ SCHOOL: NEW ROCHELLE/BARNARD EARLY CHILDHOOD CENT<br />

# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />

# OF STUDENTS: GRADE(S) PRE K-2<br />

DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 11/30/11<br />

NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />

STANDARD 1 STANDARD 2 STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />

1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />

1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />

1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />

2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />

3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />

4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />

5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />

6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />

2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />

3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />

4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />

5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />

6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />

THEY WERE INTERACTIVE AND THE CHILDREN ENJOYED THEIR<br />

PRESENTATION IMMENSELY.<br />

8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />

NONE<br />

9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />

THEY WERE AMAZING EXPECIALLY THEIR RAINFOREST SHOW.<br />

7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />

FABULOUS SHOW. HOPE TO HAVE IT RETURN NEXT YEAR.<br />

8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />

NONE<br />

9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />

NONE<br />

Arts in Education Service - School Evaluations <strong>2011</strong>-<strong>2012</strong><br />

Page 312 of 332


ARTIST: THOMAS GARDNER<br />

CONTRACT #: A7525A<br />

TITLE OF PROGRAM: THE UNCLE BROTHERS - CHARACTER ED: POSITIVE<br />

CHOICES, BULLING & KINDNESS<br />

TYPE OF PROGRAM: ASSEMBLY<br />

DISTRICT/ SCHOOL:<br />

# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />

LAKELAND/VAN CORT ELEM.<br />

# OF STUDENTS: 650 GRADE(S) K-5<br />

DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 10/7/11<br />

NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />

STANDARD 1 STANDARD 2 STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />

1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />

1.<br />

2.<br />

3.<br />

4.<br />

5.<br />

6.<br />

STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />

ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />

EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />

ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />

TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />

QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />

THEY PUT ON A FANTASTIC PROGRAM PROMOTING POSITIVE<br />

CHOICES AND ANTI-BULLYING. WE WERE VERY LUCKY TO HAVE<br />

THEM.<br />

8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />

NONE<br />

9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />

MY SCHOOL CAN'T WAIT UNTIL THEY COME BACK TO US IN THE<br />

SPRING.<br />

ARTIST: THOMAS GARDNER<br />

CONTRACT #: A7827<br />

TITLE OF PROGRAM: THE UNCLE BROTHERS - POSITIVE CHOICES<br />

TYPE OF PROGRAM: ASSEMBLY<br />

DISTRICT/ SCHOOL: LAKELAND/BENJAMIN FRANKLIN ELEM.<br />

# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />

# OF STUDENTS: 608 GRADE(S) K-5<br />

DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 10/26/11<br />

NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />

STANDARD 1 STANDARD 2 STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />

ARTIST: THOMAS GARDNER<br />

CONTRACT #: A7886<br />

TITLE OF PROGRAM: THE UNCLE BROTHERS - KINDNESS COUNTS<br />

TYPE OF PROGRAM: ASSEMBLY<br />

DISTRICT/ SCHOOL:<br />

CARMEL/PATERSON ELEM.<br />

# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />

# OF STUDENTS: 620 GRADE(S) K-4<br />

DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE<br />

11/30/11<br />

NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />

STANDARD 1 STANDARD 2 STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />

1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />

1.<br />

2.<br />

3.<br />

4.<br />

5.<br />

6.<br />

STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />

ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />

EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />

ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />

TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />

QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />

GREAT ENERGY, POSITIVE MESSAGES, AUDIENCE PARTICIPATION,<br />

DEEP REPETOIRE.<br />

8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />

NONE<br />

9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />

NONE<br />

ARTIST: THOMAS GARDNER<br />

CONTRACT #: A8500<br />

TITLE OF PROGRAM: THE UNCLE BROTHERS - STAND UP TO BULLYING<br />

TYPE OF PROGRAM: ASSEMBLY<br />

DISTRICT/ SCHOOL:<br />

LAKELAND/VAN CORT ELEM.<br />

# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />

# OF STUDENTS: 675 GRADE(S) K-5<br />

DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE<br />

2/24/12<br />

NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />

STANDARD 1 STANDARD 2 STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />

1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />

1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />

1.<br />

2.<br />

3.<br />

4.<br />

5.<br />

6.<br />

STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />

ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />

EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />

ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />

TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />

QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />

OUR STUDENTS LOOK FORWARD TO THE UNCLE BROTHERS EVERY<br />

YEAR.<br />

8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />

NONE<br />

9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />

WE USE THE UNCLE BROTHERS CD FOR CHARACTER EDUCATION<br />

AND OUR SCHOOL WIDE PBIS PROGRAM.<br />

1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />

2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />

3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />

4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />

5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />

6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />

7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />

TOMMY AND DANNY ARE AMAZING. ALL OF OUR STUDENTS<br />

PARTICIPATE IN AND LOVED THEIR SHOW.<br />

8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />

NONE<br />

9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />

WE CAN'T WAIT FOR THEM TO COME BACK.<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

Arts in Education Service - School Evaluations <strong>2011</strong>-<strong>2012</strong><br />

Page 313 of 332


ARTIST: THOMAS GARDNER<br />

CONTRACT #: A7525B<br />

TITLE OF PROGRAM: THE UNCLE BROTHERS SPARK YOUR IMAGINATION<br />

THROUGH READING<br />

TYPE OF PROGRAM: ASSEMBLY<br />

DISTRICT/ SCHOOL:<br />

# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />

LAKELAND/VAN CORT ELEM.<br />

# OF STUDENTS: 660 GRADE(S) K-5<br />

DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 5/10/12<br />

NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />

STANDARD 1 STANDARD 2 STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />

1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />

1.<br />

2.<br />

3.<br />

4.<br />

5.<br />

6.<br />

STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />

ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />

EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />

ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />

TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />

QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />

THESE GENTLEMEN DO A FANTASTIC JOB OF ENTERTAINING AND<br />

ENGAGING OUR STUDENTS.<br />

8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />

NONE<br />

9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />

THANKS FOR BEING SO FLEXIBLE AND ALWAYS PUTTING ON A<br />

GREAT SHOW.<br />

ARTIST: THOMAS RICHARDSON<br />

CONTRACT #: A8302<br />

TITLE OF PROGRAM: SET DESIGNER FOR THE SHOW - BYE, BYE BIRDIE<br />

TYPE OF PROGRAM: RESIDENCY<br />

DISTRICT/ SCHOOL:<br />

IRVINGTON/IRVINGTON HIGH SCHOOL<br />

# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />

# OF STUDENTS: 660 GRADE(S) 9-12<br />

DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE<br />

1/17-3/17/12<br />

NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />

STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 X STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />

1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />

ARTIST: THOMAS RICHARDSON<br />

CONTRACT #: A7635<br />

TITLE OF PROGRAM: SET DESIGNER FOR SHOW - THE WIZARD OF OZ<br />

TYPE OF PROGRAM: RESIDENCY<br />

DISTRICT/ SCHOOL: IRVINGTON/IRVINGTON HIGH SCHOOL<br />

# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />

# OF STUDENTS: 50 GRADE(S) 9-12<br />

DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 9/19-11/6/11<br />

NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />

STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 X STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />

1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />

1.<br />

2.<br />

3.<br />

4.<br />

5.<br />

6.<br />

STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />

ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />

EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />

ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />

TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />

QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

N/<br />

7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />

THE STUDENTS LEARN NOT ONLY THE SKILLS REQUIRED TO<br />

MOUNT A MUSICAL PRODUCTION, THEY LEARN RESPONSIBILITY TO<br />

OTHERS AND INDEPENDENCE.<br />

8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />

NONE<br />

9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />

ARTIST:<br />

THOMAS IS WONDERFUL WITH THE STUDENTS AND HAS GREAT<br />

ARTISTIC TALENT. HIS LEVEL OF COMMITMENT AND WORK ETHIC<br />

ARE PHENOMINAL.<br />

TIFFANY RADOVICH<br />

CONTRACT #: A8535<br />

TITLE OF PROGRAM: OBOE PLAYER FOR THE SHOW - ONCE UPON A<br />

MATTRESS<br />

TYPE OF PROGRAM: ASSEMBLY<br />

DISTRICT/ SCHOOL:<br />

SOMERS/SOMERS HIGH SCHOOL<br />

# OF TEACHERS: 2<br />

# OF STUDENTS: 50 GRADE(S) 9-12<br />

DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 3/12-18/12<br />

NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />

STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />

1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />

1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />

2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />

3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />

4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />

5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />

6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />

7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />

A GREAT PROGRAM FOR OUR SCHOOL.<br />

8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />

NONE<br />

9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />

NONE<br />

5<br />

4<br />

4<br />

4<br />

4<br />

N/<br />

1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />

2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />

3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />

4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />

5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />

6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />

7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />

NONE<br />

8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />

NONE<br />

9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />

NONE<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

Arts in Education Service - School Evaluations <strong>2011</strong>-<strong>2012</strong><br />

Page 314 of 332


ARTIST: TIMOTHY GREEN<br />

CONTRACT #: A8256<br />

TITLE OF PROGRAM: AUTHOR VISIT<br />

TYPE OF PROGRAM: ASSEMBLY<br />

DISTRICT/ SCHOOL: CHAPPAQUA/BELL MIDDLE SCHOOL<br />

# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />

# OF STUDENTS: 175 GRADE(S) 5<br />

DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 3/19/12<br />

NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />

STANDARD 1 STANDARD 2 STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />

1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />

ARTIST: TODD HALL<br />

CONTRACT #: A8524<br />

TITLE OF PROGRAM: CHOREOGRAPHY FOR THE SPRING MUSICAL - GUYS<br />

& DOLLS<br />

TYPE OF PROGRAM: RESIDENCY<br />

DISTRICT/ SCHOOL: KATONAH/LEWISBORO/JOHN JAY HIGH SCHOOL<br />

# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />

# OF STUDENTS: 40 GRADE(S) 9-12<br />

DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 2/17 & 18/12<br />

NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />

STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 X STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />

1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />

1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />

2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />

3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />

4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />

5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />

6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />

7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />

VERY ENGAGING. STUDENT RESPONDED VERY WELL.<br />

8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />

NONE<br />

9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />

NONE<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />

2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />

3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />

4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />

5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />

6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />

7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />

TERRIFIC PROGRAM, VERY ENTHUSIASTIC.<br />

8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />

NONE<br />

9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />

NONE<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

ARTIST: TODD STRASSER<br />

CONTRACT #: A8327<br />

TITLE OF PROGRAM: AUTHOR VISIT - HOW TO WRITE A BOOK<br />

TYPE OF PROGRAM: ASSEMBLY/WORKSHOP<br />

DISTRICT/ SCHOOL: EASTCHESTER/EASTCHESTER MIDDLE SCHOOL<br />

# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />

# OF STUDENTS: 250 GRADE(S) 8<br />

DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 2/15/12<br />

NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />

STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 X STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />

ARTIST: TRACEY C. PEARSON dba TRACEY CAM<br />

CONTRACT #: A8710<br />

TITLE OF PROGRAM: AUTHOR/ILLUSTRATOR VISIT<br />

TYPE OF PROGRAM: ASSEMBLY<br />

DISTRICT/ SCHOOL:<br />

# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />

YORKTOWN/BROOKSIDE ELEM.<br />

# OF STUDENTS: GRADE(S) K & 1<br />

DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 5/15/12<br />

NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />

STANDARD 1 STANDARD 2 STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />

1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />

1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />

1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />

2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />

3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />

4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />

5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />

6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />

7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />

THE PROGRAM WAS INSIGHTFUL AND PROVIDED ALL STUDENTS<br />

WITH THE OPPORTUNITY TO DELVE INTO THE PROCESS THAT<br />

AUTHORS GO THROUGH TO PUBLISH A BOOK.<br />

8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />

PROVIDE STUDENTS WITH MATERIALS.<br />

9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />

TODD WAS FLEXIBLE AND AMENABLE TO ALL SUGGESTIONS AND<br />

FEEDBACK FROM PREVIOUS YEARS.<br />

5<br />

4<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

3<br />

1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />

2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />

3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />

4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />

5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />

6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />

7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />

SHE IS WARM AND ENGAGING WITH THE STUDENTS, AND HER<br />

MESSAGE WAS CLEAR. YOU ARE ALREADY WRITERS AND<br />

ILLUSTRATORS. KEEP PRACTICING.<br />

8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />

NONE<br />

9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />

THE SPACE PROVIDED WAS NOT IDEAL. THE CAFETERIA WAS<br />

NOISY. SOUND QUALITY WAS AN ISSUE. TRACEY WORKED LIKE A<br />

TROOPER TO OVERCOME THAT BUT I THINK 2 CLASSES IN A<br />

CLASSROOM WOULD BE BETTER.<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

Arts in Education Service - School Evaluations <strong>2011</strong>-<strong>2012</strong><br />

Page 315 of 332


ARTIST: TRACY JOHNSON<br />

CONTRACT #: A8739<br />

TITLE OF PROGRAM: CHOREOGRAPHER FOR P.O.W.A. WOMEN'S HISTORY<br />

PERFORMANCE<br />

TYPE OF PROGRAM: RESIDENCY<br />

DISTRICT/ SCHOOL: MT.VERNON/MT. VERNON HIGH SCHOOL<br />

# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />

# OF STUDENTS: GRADE(S) 9-12<br />

DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 4/16-20/12<br />

NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />

STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 X STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />

1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />

ARTIST: TRACY JOHNSON<br />

CONTRACT #: A8811<br />

TITLE OF PROGRAM: DANCE PROJECT<br />

TYPE OF PROGRAM: RESIDENCY<br />

DISTRICT/ SCHOOL: MT.VERNON/MT. VERNON HIGH SCHOOL<br />

# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />

# OF STUDENTS: GRADE(S) 9-12<br />

DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 5/4-6/8/12<br />

NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />

STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 X STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />

1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />

1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />

2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />

3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />

4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />

5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />

6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />

7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />

OUR ENGLISH DEPT. STAFF WERE VERY IMPRESSED WITH THE<br />

MANNER IN WHICH TRACY INTEGRATED HER DANCE PROGRAM<br />

WITH THE ELA CONTENT.<br />

8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />

NONE<br />

9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />

NONE<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />

2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />

3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />

4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />

5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />

6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />

7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />

NONE<br />

8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />

NONE<br />

9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />

NONE<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

ARTIST: TROYE EVERS<br />

CONTRACT #: A8253<br />

TITLE OF PROGRAM: HAIR & MAKE-UP DESIGNER FOR THE SHOW -<br />

LYSISTRATA<br />

TYPE OF PROGRAM: RESIDENCY<br />

DISTRICT/ SCHOOL: CHAPPAQUA/HORACE GREELEY HIGH SCHOOL<br />

# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />

# OF STUDENTS: 20 GRADE(S) 9-12<br />

DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 1/17-19/12<br />

NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />

STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 X STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />

ARTIST: TROYE EVERS<br />

CONTRACT #: A8763<br />

TITLE OF PROGRAM: HAIR & MAKE-UP DESIGNER FOR THE SHOW - OUR<br />

TOWN<br />

TYPE OF PROGRAM: RESIDENCY<br />

DISTRICT/ SCHOOL: CHAPPAQUA/HORACE GREELEY HIGH SCHOOL<br />

# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />

# OF STUDENTS: 21 GRADE(S) 9-12<br />

DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 4/23-5/5/12<br />

NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />

STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 X STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />

1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />

1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />

1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />

2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />

3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />

4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />

5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />

6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />

2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />

3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />

4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />

5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />

6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />

TROYE IS A GIFTED DESIGNER AND WORKS WELL WITH THE<br />

STUDENTS.<br />

8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />

NONE<br />

9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />

NONE<br />

7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />

TROYE IS A GIFTED DESIGNER AND WORKS WELL WITH THE<br />

STUDENTS.<br />

8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />

NONE<br />

9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />

I LOOK FORWARD TO WORKING WITH HIM AGAIN.<br />

Arts in Education Service - School Evaluations <strong>2011</strong>-<strong>2012</strong><br />

Page 316 of 332


ARTIST: TROYE EVERS<br />

CONTRACT #: A8384<br />

TITLE OF PROGRAM: HAIR & MAKE-UP DESIGNER FOR THE SHOW - SIX<br />

DEGREES OF SEPARATION<br />

TYPE OF PROGRAM: RESIDENCY<br />

DISTRICT/ SCHOOL: CHAPPAQUA/HORACE GREELEY HIGH SCHOOL<br />

# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />

# OF STUDENTS: 19 GRADE(S) 9-12<br />

DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 2/27-3/12/12<br />

NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />

STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 X STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />

ARTIST: TROYE EVERS<br />

CONTRACT #: A7542<br />

TITLE OF PROGRAM: HAIR & MAKE-UP DESIGNER FOR THE SHOW - THE<br />

DROWSY CHAPERONE<br />

TYPE OF PROGRAM: RESIDENCY<br />

DISTRICT/ SCHOOL: CHAPPAQUA/HORACE GREELEY HIGH SCHOOL<br />

# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />

# OF STUDENTS: 27 GRADE(S) 9-12<br />

DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 11/11-19/11<br />

NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />

STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 X STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />

1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />

1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />

1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />

2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />

3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />

4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />

5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />

6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />

2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />

3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />

4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />

5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />

6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />

TROYE IS A GIFTED DESIGNER AND WORKS WELL WITH THE<br />

STUDENTS.<br />

8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />

NONE<br />

9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />

I LOOK FORWARDED TO WORKING WITH HIM AGAIN.<br />

7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM?<br />

TROYE IS A GIFTED DESIGNER.<br />

8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />

NONE<br />

9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />

I LOOK FORWARD TO WORKING WITH HIM AGAIN.<br />

Y<br />

WHY?<br />

ARTIST: TROYE EVERS<br />

CONTRACT #: A8557<br />

TITLE OF PROGRAM: HAIR & MAKE-UP DESIGNER FOR THE SHOW -<br />

XANADU<br />

TYPE OF PROGRAM: RESIDENCY<br />

DISTRICT/ SCHOOL: CHAPPAQUA/HORACE GREELEY HIGH SCHOOL<br />

# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />

# OF STUDENTS: 200 GRADE(S) 12<br />

DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 4/9-21/12<br />

NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />

STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 X STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />

1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />

1.<br />

2.<br />

3.<br />

4.<br />

5.<br />

6.<br />

STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />

ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />

EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />

ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />

TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />

QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />

IMPORTANT FOR STUDENTS TO SEE HOW ALL THE COMPONENTS<br />

OF A MUSICAL SHOW ARE DESIGNED, CREATED AND COME<br />

TOGETHER.<br />

8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />

NONE<br />

9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />

TROYE WAS FORTUNATE TO HAVE A FORMER STUDENT AND<br />

PARENT VOLUNTEERS WITH EXPERIENCE IN THE PROFESSION TO<br />

ASSIST HIM WITH HAIR AND MAKE UP EXECUTION.<br />

ARTIST: TWIN LAKES PRODUCTION, INC. CONTRACT #: A8220<br />

TITLE OF PROGRAM: JOHN ARRUCCI - PERCUSSION AROUND THE WORLD<br />

TYPE OF PROGRAM: WORKSHOP<br />

DISTRICT/ SCHOOL: CHAPPAQUA/SEVEN BRIDGES MIDDLE SCHOOL<br />

# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />

# OF STUDENTS: 40 GRADE(S) 8<br />

DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 6/1/12<br />

NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />

STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 X STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4 X<br />

1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />

1.<br />

2.<br />

3.<br />

4.<br />

5.<br />

6.<br />

STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />

ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />

EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />

ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />

TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />

QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />

JOHN WAS OUTSTANDING. IT WAS AMAZING WHAT HE COULD GET<br />

THE CHILDREN DOING IN SUCH A SHORT AMOUNT OF TIME.<br />

8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />

NONE<br />

9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />

ALSO AMAZING HOW HE LINKED PLAYING MUSIC WITH LIFE<br />

LESSONS, REALLY KNOWS HOW TO GET CHILDREN MOTIVATED.<br />

Arts in Education Service - School Evaluations <strong>2011</strong>-<strong>2012</strong><br />

Page 317 of 332


ARTIST: TWIN LAKES PRODUCTION, INC. CONTRACT #: A8420<br />

TITLE OF PROGRAM: JOHN ARRUCCI - PERCUSSION AROUND THE WORLD<br />

TYPE OF PROGRAM: ASSEMBLY<br />

DISTRICT/ SCHOOL: HENDRICK HUDSON/FURNACE WOODS ELEM.<br />

# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />

# OF STUDENTS: GRADE(S) K-5<br />

DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 2/8/12<br />

NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />

STANDARD 1 STANDARD 2 STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4 X<br />

ARTIST: TWIN LAKES PRODUCTION, INC. CONTRACT #: A7739A<br />

TITLE OF PROGRAM: JOHN ARRUCCI - PERCUSSION AROUND THE WORLD<br />

TYPE OF PROGRAM: ASSEMBLY<br />

DISTRICT/ SCHOOL: CHAPPAQUA/BELL MIDDLE SCHOOL<br />

# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />

# OF STUDENTS: 160 GRADE(S) 6<br />

DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 10/7/11<br />

NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />

STANDARD 1 STANDARD 2 STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4 X<br />

1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />

1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />

1.<br />

2.<br />

3.<br />

4.<br />

5.<br />

6.<br />

STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />

ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />

EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />

ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />

TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />

QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />

HE WAS INCREDIBLY KNOWLEDGEABLE ABOUT THE MATERIAL<br />

PRESENTED. HE WAS ENGAGING FOR ALL GRADES AND<br />

EXPLAINED THE HISTORICAL, CULTURAL AND MUSICAL ASPECTS<br />

OF THE PROGRAM IN AGE APPROPRIATE VOCABULARY.<br />

8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />

NONE<br />

9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />

HE IS EXTREMELY TALENTED AND IS A JOY TO HAVE IN THE<br />

CLASSROOM. ALL OF THE STUDENTS WERE ENGAGED AND<br />

INTERESTED. A FANTASTIC PRESENTATION.<br />

1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />

2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />

3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />

4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />

5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />

6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />

7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />

VERY WELL RECEIVED.<br />

8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />

NONE<br />

9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />

NONE<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

ARTIST: TWIN LAKES PRODUCTION, INC. CONTRACT #: A8507B<br />

TITLE OF PROGRAM: JOHN ARRUCCI - PERCUSSION AROUND THE WORLD<br />

TYPE OF PROGRAM: ASSEMBLY<br />

DISTRICT/ SCHOOL:<br />

# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />

OSSINING/PARK SCHOOL<br />

# OF STUDENTS: 650 GRADE(S) K<br />

DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 3/22/12<br />

NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />

STANDARD 1 STANDARD 2 STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4 X<br />

ARTIST: TWIN LAKES PRODUCTION, INC. CONTRACT #: A8507A<br />

TITLE OF PROGRAM: JOHN ARRUCCI - PERCUSSION AROUND THE WORLD<br />

TYPE OF PROGRAM: ASSEMBLY<br />

DISTRICT/ SCHOOL:<br />

# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />

OSSINING/ROOSEVELT<br />

# OF STUDENTS: 304 GRADE(S) 5<br />

DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 3/6/12<br />

NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />

STANDARD 1 STANDARD 2 STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4 X<br />

1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />

1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />

1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />

2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />

3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />

4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />

5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />

6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />

7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />

JOHN IS A FIRST RATE MUSICIAN AND AN EXCELLENT TEACHER.<br />

8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />

NONE<br />

9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />

ALTHOUGH OUR PROGRAM HAD TO BE ALTERED, JOHN'S GREAT<br />

FLEXIBILITY AND EASY SPIRIT MADE EVERYTHING WORK OUT<br />

WELL.<br />

4<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

4<br />

N/<br />

1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />

2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />

3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />

4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />

5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />

6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />

7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />

NONE<br />

8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />

NONE<br />

9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />

NONE<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

Arts in Education Service - School Evaluations <strong>2011</strong>-<strong>2012</strong><br />

Page 318 of 332


ARTIST: TWIN LAKES PRODUCTION, INC. CONTRACT #: A8103<br />

TITLE OF PROGRAM: JOHN ARRUCCI - PERCUSSION AROUND THE WORLD<br />

TYPE OF PROGRAM: ASSEMBLY<br />

DISTRICT/ SCHOOL:<br />

# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />

CARMEL/PATERSON ELEM.<br />

# OF STUDENTS: 600 GRADE(S) K-4<br />

DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 12/7/11<br />

NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />

STANDARD 1 STANDARD 2 STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4 X<br />

ARTIST: TWIN LAKES PRODUCTION, INC. CONTRACT #: A8420<br />

TITLE OF PROGRAM: JOHN ARRUCCI - PERCUSSION AROUND THE WORLD<br />

TYPE OF PROGRAM: ASSEMBLY<br />

DISTRICT/ SCHOOL: HENDRICK HUDSON/FURNACE WOODS ELEM.<br />

# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />

# OF STUDENTS: GRADE(S) K-5<br />

DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 2/8/12<br />

NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />

STANDARD 1 STANDARD 2 STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4 X<br />

1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />

1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />

1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />

2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />

3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />

4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />

5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />

6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

N/<br />

1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />

2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />

3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />

4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />

5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />

6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />

CHILDREN GET TO SEE RARE INSTRUMENTS FROM FOREIGN<br />

COUNTRIES.<br />

8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />

NONE<br />

9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />

JOHN IS AN AMAZING PERFORMER.<br />

7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />

HE WAS INCREDIBLY KNOWLEDGEABLE ABOUT THE MATERIAL<br />

PRESENTED. IT WAS ENGAGING FOR ALL GRADES.<br />

8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />

NONE<br />

9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />

HE IS EXTREMELY TALENTED AND IS A JOY TO HAVE IN THE<br />

CLASSROOM.<br />

ARTIST: TWIN LAKES PRODUCTION, INC. CONTRACT #: A8215<br />

TITLE OF PROGRAM: JOHN ARRUCCI - PERCUSSION AROUND THE WORLD<br />

TYPE OF PROGRAM: ASSEMBLY<br />

DISTRICT/ SCHOOL: HENDRICK HUDSON/FRANK G. LINDSEY ELEM.<br />

# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />

# OF STUDENTS: 420 GRADE(S) K-2<br />

DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 12/21/12<br />

NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />

STANDARD 1 STANDARD 2 STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4 X<br />

ARTIST: TWIN LAKES PRODUCTION, INC. CONTRACT #: A8233<br />

TITLE OF PROGRAM: JOHN ARRUCCI - PERCUSSION AROUND THE WORLD<br />

TYPE OF PROGRAM: ASSEMBLY/RESIDENCY<br />

DISTRICT/ SCHOOL:<br />

# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />

CARMEL/KENT ELEM. SCHOOL<br />

# OF STUDENTS: 200 GRADE(S) K-4<br />

DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 3/14-16/12<br />

NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />

STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 X STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4 X<br />

1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />

1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />

1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />

2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />

3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />

4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />

5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />

6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />

7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />

NONE<br />

8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />

NONE<br />

9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />

NONE<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

1.<br />

2.<br />

3.<br />

4.<br />

5.<br />

6.<br />

STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />

ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />

EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />

ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />

TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />

QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />

HIS PROGRAM INCORPORATED MANY AREAS OF THE CURRICULUM<br />

FROM THE SCIENCE OF SOUND TO THE EXPLORATION AND<br />

CONTRIBUTION OF MULTI CULTURAL MUSIC. JOHN CAPTURED THE<br />

CHILDREN'S ATTENTION AND TAUGHT THEM NEW SKILLS THAT<br />

THEY CAN USE IN THEIR MUSICAL STUDIES.<br />

8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />

NONE<br />

9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />

NONE<br />

Arts in Education Service - School Evaluations <strong>2011</strong>-<strong>2012</strong><br />

Page 319 of 332


ARTIST: UNDERCURRENT DESIGNS, INC. dba DA CONTRACT #: A8436<br />

TITLE OF PROGRAM: CLIFF MENDELSON - GREEK DESIGNS / POTTERS<br />

WHEEL<br />

TYPE OF PROGRAM: WORKSHOP<br />

DISTRICT/ SCHOOL: NEW ROCHELLE/NEW ROCHELLE HS<br />

# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />

# OF STUDENTS: GRADE(S) 9-12<br />

DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 3/15/12<br />

NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />

STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 X STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4 X<br />

1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />

ARTIST: UNDERCURRENT DESIGNS, INC. dba DA<br />

CONTRACT #: A8318<br />

TITLE OF PROGRAM: CLIFF MENDELSON - MASK MAKING<br />

TYPE OF PROGRAM: WORKSHOP<br />

DISTRICT/ SCHOOL: LAKELAND/THOMAS JEFFERSON ELEM.<br />

# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />

# OF STUDENTS: 76 GRADE(S) 5<br />

DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 3/5/12<br />

NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />

STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 X STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4 X<br />

1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />

1.<br />

2.<br />

3.<br />

4.<br />

5.<br />

6.<br />

STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />

ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />

EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />

ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />

TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />

QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />

CLIFF IS VERY ENTHUSIASTIC, CREATIVE, PROFESSIONAL ARTIST<br />

AND POTTER. HE WAS WELL PREPARED WITH WONDERFUL<br />

VISUALS AND HISTORIC EXAMPLES OF GREEK VASES.<br />

8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />

NONE<br />

9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />

CLIFF IS A COMPLETE PLEASURE AND I WOULD HIGHLY<br />

RECOMMENT HIM.<br />

1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />

2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />

3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />

4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />

5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />

6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />

7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />

THE STUDENTS WER ACTIVELY ENGAGED AND WERE ABLE TO<br />

EXPRESS THEMSELVES THROUGH THEIR ART.<br />

8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />

NONE<br />

9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />

NONE<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

ARTIST: UNDERCURRENT DESIGNS, INC. dba DA<br />

CONTRACT #: A7650<br />

TITLE OF PROGRAM: CLIFF MENDELSON - TILE WORKSHOPS<br />

TYPE OF PROGRAM: RESIDENCY<br />

DISTRICT/ SCHOOL: NEW ROCHELLE/JEFFERSON ELEM.<br />

# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />

# OF STUDENTS: 98 GRADE(S) 5<br />

DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 1/5-6/12<br />

NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />

STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 X STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4 X<br />

ARTIST: UP AGAINST THE WALL PRODUCTIONS CONTRACT #: A7916<br />

TITLE OF PROGRAM: INTO TO FILM PRODUCTION<br />

TYPE OF PROGRAM: RESIDENCY<br />

DISTRICT/ SCHOOL: NEW ROCHELLE/JEFFERSON ELEM.<br />

# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />

# OF STUDENTS: 25 GRADE(S) 2-4<br />

DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 11/5/11-2/12/12<br />

NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />

STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 X STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />

1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />

1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />

1.<br />

2.<br />

3.<br />

4.<br />

5.<br />

6.<br />

STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />

ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />

EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />

ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />

TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />

QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />

CLIFF IS BEYOND FANTASTIC. HE COMES TO JEFFERSON EVERY<br />

YEAR AND IS PROFESSIONAL AND UNBELIEVEABLY GREAT WITH<br />

STUDENTS.<br />

8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />

NONE<br />

9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />

HE KNOWS HIS ART TOO.<br />

1.<br />

2.<br />

3.<br />

4.<br />

5.<br />

6.<br />

STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />

ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />

EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />

ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />

TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />

QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />

CHAZZ REALLY KNOWS THE CRAFT OF FILM MAKING AND IS ABLE<br />

TO GET STUDENTS TO CREATE GREAT PRODUCTIONS THAT THEY<br />

HAVE WRITTEN AND PRODUCED.<br />

8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />

NONE<br />

9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />

NONE<br />

Arts in Education Service - School Evaluations <strong>2011</strong>-<strong>2012</strong><br />

Page 320 of 332


ARTIST: VANESSA NASTRI<br />

CONTRACT #: A8313<br />

TITLE OF PROGRAM: CHOREOGRAPHER<br />

TYPE OF PROGRAM: RESIDENCY<br />

DISTRICT/ SCHOOL:<br />

# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />

TUCKAHOE/W. E. COTTLE ELEM.<br />

# OF STUDENTS: 11 GRADE(S) 4 & 5<br />

DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 2/2-6/14/12<br />

NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />

STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 X STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />

1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />

ARTIST: VERONICA MITTENZWEI<br />

CONTRACT #: A8714<br />

TITLE OF PROGRAM: DIRECTOR & CHOREOGRAPHER FOR - BULLIES<br />

ANONYMOUS<br />

TYPE OF PROGRAM: RESIDENCY<br />

DISTRICT/ SCHOOL: WHITE PLAINS/MAMARONECK AVENUE ELEM. ELEM.<br />

# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />

# OF STUDENTS: 75 GRADE(S) K-5<br />

DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 6/7 & 8/12<br />

NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />

STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 X STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />

1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />

1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />

2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />

3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />

4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />

5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />

6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />

7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />

NONE<br />

8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />

NONE<br />

9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />

GREAT SHOW.<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

4<br />

4<br />

1.<br />

2.<br />

3.<br />

4.<br />

5.<br />

6.<br />

STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />

ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />

EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />

ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />

TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />

QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />

VERONICA WROTE AN INCREDIBLE SCRIPT FOR OUR STUDENTS. IT<br />

WAS INFORMATIVE, CLEVER, PERTINENT AND HUMOROUS. SHE<br />

PUTS ON INCREDIBLE PRODUCTIONS THAT WE ALL GET TO<br />

PARTICIPATE IN.<br />

8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />

NONE<br />

9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />

IT IS THE HIGHLIGHT OF OUR YEAR. SHE BRINGS ELEMENTARY<br />

STUDENTS TO A PROFESSIONAL LEVEL.<br />

ARTIST: VINCENT DAVIS<br />

CONTRACT #: A7550<br />

TITLE OF PROGRAM: CARTOONING<br />

TYPE OF PROGRAM: WORKSHOP<br />

DISTRICT/ SCHOOL: KATONAH/LEWISBORO/KATONAH ELEM. SCHOOL<br />

# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />

# OF STUDENTS: GRADE(S) 2-4<br />

DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 9/26-11/21/11<br />

NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />

STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 X STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />

ARTIST: VINCENT DAVIS<br />

CONTRACT #: A8610<br />

TITLE OF PROGRAM: CARTOONING<br />

TYPE OF PROGRAM: WORKSHOP<br />

DISTRICT/ SCHOOL: EASTCHESTER/GREENVALE ELEM.<br />

# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />

# OF STUDENTS: 7 GRADE(S) 3-5<br />

DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 3/22-5/1/12<br />

NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />

STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 X STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />

1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />

1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />

1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />

2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />

3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />

4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />

5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />

6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />

3<br />

3<br />

3<br />

3<br />

3<br />

3<br />

1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />

2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />

3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />

4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />

5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />

6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

N/<br />

7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />

CHILDREN ENJOYED WORKING WITH THE ARTIST. WELL DONE.<br />

7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM?<br />

GREAT PROGRAM. VERY PROFESSIONAL.<br />

Y<br />

WHY?<br />

8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />

NONE<br />

9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />

NONE<br />

8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />

NONE<br />

9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />

NONE<br />

Arts in Education Service - School Evaluations <strong>2011</strong>-<strong>2012</strong><br />

Page 321 of 332


ARTIST: VINCENT DAVIS<br />

CONTRACT #: A7665<br />

TITLE OF PROGRAM: CARTOONING<br />

TYPE OF PROGRAM: WORKSHOP<br />

DISTRICT/ SCHOOL: EASTCHESTER/GREENVALE ELEM.<br />

# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />

# OF STUDENTS: 11 GRADE(S) 3-5<br />

DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 10/20-12/15/11<br />

NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />

STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 X STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />

ARTIST: VINCENT DAVIS<br />

CONTRACT #: A8229<br />

TITLE OF PROGRAM: CARTOONING<br />

TYPE OF PROGRAM: WORKSHOP<br />

DISTRICT/ SCHOOL: KATONAH/LEWISBORO/INCREASE MILLER ELEM.<br />

# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />

# OF STUDENTS: 7 GRADE(S) 1-5<br />

DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 1/19-3/15/12<br />

NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />

STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 X STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />

1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />

1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />

1.<br />

2.<br />

3.<br />

4.<br />

5.<br />

6.<br />

STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />

ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />

EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />

ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />

TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />

QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

N/<br />

7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />

VINCENT WAS A WONDERFUL ADDITION TO OUR PROGRAM. THE<br />

STUDENTS REALLY ENJOYED HIS CLASS.<br />

8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />

NONE<br />

9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />

NONE<br />

1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />

2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />

3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />

4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />

5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />

6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />

7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />

NONE<br />

8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />

NONE<br />

9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />

NONE<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

N/<br />

N/<br />

ARTIST: VINCENT DAVIS<br />

CONTRACT #: A8690<br />

TITLE OF PROGRAM: DRAWING<br />

TYPE OF PROGRAM: WORKSHOP<br />

DISTRICT/ SCHOOL: KATONAH/LEWISBORO/KATONAH ELEM. SCHOOL<br />

# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />

# OF STUDENTS: 8 GRADE(S) 1 & 2<br />

DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 4/9-6/4/12<br />

NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />

STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 X STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />

1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />

ARTIST: WALTER BARRETT<br />

CONTRACT #: A8650<br />

TITLE OF PROGRAM: TROMBONE PLAYER FOR THE SHOW - A FUNNY<br />

THING HAPPENED ON THE WAY TO THE FORUM<br />

TYPE OF PROGRAM: ASSEMBLY<br />

DISTRICT/ SCHOOL: PUTNAM VALLEY/PUTNAM VALLEY HIGH SCHOOL<br />

# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />

# OF STUDENTS: 400 GRADE(S) 9-12<br />

DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 4/13-23/12<br />

NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />

STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />

1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />

1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />

2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />

3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />

4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />

5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />

6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />

7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />

NONE<br />

8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />

NONE<br />

9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />

NONE<br />

4<br />

4<br />

4<br />

4<br />

4<br />

4<br />

1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />

2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />

3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />

4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />

5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />

6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />

7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />

NONE<br />

8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />

NONE<br />

9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />

NONE<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

Arts in Education Service - School Evaluations <strong>2011</strong>-<strong>2012</strong><br />

Page 322 of 332


ARTIST: WALTER BARRETT<br />

CONTRACT #: A7718<br />

TITLE OF PROGRAM: TROMBONE PLAYER FOR THE SHOW - ANNIE GET<br />

YOUR GUN<br />

TYPE OF PROGRAM: ASSEMBLY<br />

DISTRICT/ SCHOOL: LAKELAND/WALTER PANAS HIGH SCHOOL<br />

# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />

# OF STUDENTS: 100 GRADE(S) 9-12<br />

DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 11/14-19/11<br />

NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />

STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />

1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />

ARTIST: WALTER BARRETT<br />

CONTRACT #: A8063<br />

TITLE OF PROGRAM: TROMBONE PLAYER FOR THE SHOW - BARNUM<br />

TYPE OF PROGRAM: ASSEMBLY<br />

DISTRICT/ SCHOOL: NORTH SALEM/NORTH SALEM MIDDLE & HIGH SCHOO<br />

# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />

# OF STUDENTS: 200 GRADE(S) 6-12<br />

DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 2/4-12/12<br />

NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />

STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />

1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />

1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />

2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />

3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />

4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />

5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />

6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />

7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />

GREAT WORKING WITH WALTER.<br />

8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />

NONE<br />

9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />

NONE<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

1.<br />

2.<br />

3.<br />

4.<br />

5.<br />

6.<br />

STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />

ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />

EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />

ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />

TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />

QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />

MR. BARRETT IS A FINE MUSICAN AND AN INSPIRATION TO YOUNG<br />

MUSICIANS.<br />

8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />

NONE<br />

9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />

NONE<br />

ARTIST: WALTER BARRETT<br />

CONTRACT #: A8335<br />

TITLE OF PROGRAM: TUBA PLAYER FOR THE SHOW - MY FAIR LADY<br />

TYPE OF PROGRAM: ASSEMBLY<br />

DISTRICT/ SCHOOL: LAKELAND/WALTER PANAS HIGH SCHOOL<br />

# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />

# OF STUDENTS: 200 GRADE(S) 9-12<br />

DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 4/30-5/5/12<br />

NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />

STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />

ARTIST: WENDY H. GROSS dba WENDY GROSS CONTRACT #: A8751<br />

TITLE OF PROGRAM: YOUNG PLAYWRIGHTS<br />

TYPE OF PROGRAM: RESIDENCY<br />

DISTRICT/ SCHOOL: WHITE PLAINS/EASTCHESTER HIGH SCHOOL<br />

# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />

# OF STUDENTS: 150 GRADE(S) 6<br />

DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 5/24-25/12<br />

NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />

STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 X STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />

1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />

1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />

1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />

2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />

3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />

4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />

5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />

6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />

7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />

NONE<br />

8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />

NONE<br />

9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />

NONE<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

1.<br />

2.<br />

3.<br />

4.<br />

5.<br />

6.<br />

STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />

ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />

EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />

ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />

TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />

QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />

THE STUDENTS SPENT TIME ON INTENSE CRITICAL THINKING AND<br />

WRITING OF A PLAY, AND THEY LOVED IT.<br />

8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />

NONE<br />

9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />

NONE<br />

Arts in Education Service - School Evaluations <strong>2011</strong>-<strong>2012</strong><br />

Page 323 of 332


ARTIST: WESTCHESTER MIXED MARTIAL ARTS CONTRACT #: A8292<br />

TITLE OF PROGRAM: ALLISON SCHLECK - ART OF KARATE & MOVEMENT<br />

TYPE OF PROGRAM: WORKSHOP<br />

DISTRICT/ SCHOOL: KATONAH/LEWISBORO/KATONAH ELEM. SCHOOL<br />

# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />

# OF STUDENTS: 9 GRADE(S) K-4<br />

DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 1/19-3/15/12<br />

NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />

STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 X STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4 X<br />

ARTIST: WESTCHESTER MIXED MARTIAL ARTS CONTRACT #: A7560<br />

TITLE OF PROGRAM: BRANDON DURHAM - ART & MOVEMENT OF KARATE<br />

TYPE OF PROGRAM: WORKSHOP<br />

DISTRICT/ SCHOOL: KATONAH/LEWISBORO/KATONAH ELEM. SCHOOL<br />

# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />

# OF STUDENTS: 8 GRADE(S) K-2<br />

DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 9/30-12/9/11<br />

NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />

STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 X STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4 X<br />

1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />

1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />

1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />

2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />

3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />

4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />

5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />

6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />

4<br />

4<br />

4<br />

4<br />

4<br />

4<br />

1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />

2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />

3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />

4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />

5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />

6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />

4<br />

4<br />

4<br />

4<br />

4<br />

4<br />

7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM?<br />

STUDENTS ALWAYS ENJOY THIS PROGRAM.<br />

Y<br />

WHY?<br />

7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />

IT IS A WELL RUN PROGRAM AND OUR STUDENTS LIKED IT.<br />

8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />

NONE<br />

9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />

NONE<br />

8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />

NONE<br />

9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />

NONE<br />

ARTIST: WESTCHESTER PHILHARMONIC CONTRACT #: A8639<br />

TITLE OF PROGRAM: PHILHARMONIC ALIVE<br />

TYPE OF PROGRAM: WORKSHOP<br />

DISTRICT/ SCHOOL:<br />

# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />

TARRYTOWN/W. L. MORSE ELEM.<br />

# OF STUDENTS: 600 GRADE(S) K-2<br />

DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 3/5, 26 & 5/1/12<br />

NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />

STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />

ARTIST: WI-FI HIGH PRODUCTIONS, LLC CONTRACT #: A8454<br />

TITLE OF PROGRAM: MATT FRANZETTI - VIRTUALLY ME!<br />

TYPE OF PROGRAM: ASSEMBLY<br />

DISTRICT/ SCHOOL: NORTH SALEM/NORTH SALEM MIDDLE SCHOOL<br />

# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />

# OF STUDENTS: 300 GRADE(S) 6-8<br />

DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 2/15/12<br />

NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />

STANDARD 1 STANDARD 2 STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />

1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />

1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />

1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />

2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />

3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />

4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />

5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />

6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />

2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />

3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />

4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />

5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />

6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />

4<br />

4<br />

4<br />

4<br />

4<br />

4<br />

7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM?<br />

NONE<br />

Y<br />

WHY?<br />

7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />

THIS IS A GOOD MEANINGFUL SHOW FOR THE MIDDLE GRADES.<br />

8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />

NONE<br />

9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />

EXCELLENT.<br />

8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />

NONE<br />

9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />

NONE<br />

Arts in Education Service - School Evaluations <strong>2011</strong>-<strong>2012</strong><br />

Page 324 of 332


ARTIST: WILLIAM BROWN<br />

CONTRACT #: A8161<br />

TITLE OF PROGRAM: SET DESIGNER CONSTRUCTION FOR THE SHOW -<br />

BEAUTY AND THE BEAST<br />

TYPE OF PROGRAM: RESIDENCY<br />

DISTRICT/ SCHOOL: PLEASANTVILLE/PLEASANTVILLE HIGH SCHOOL<br />

# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />

# OF STUDENTS: 1000 GRADE(S) 9-12<br />

DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 1/3-3/20/12<br />

NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />

STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 X STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />

ARTIST: WILLIAM BUMBOLOW<br />

CONTRACT #: A7705<br />

TITLE OF PROGRAM: LIGHTING DESIGNER FOR THE FALL MUSICAL - ANNIE<br />

GET YOUR GUN<br />

TYPE OF PROGRAM: RESIDENCY<br />

DISTRICT/ SCHOOL: LAKELAND/WALTER PANAS HIGH SCHOOL<br />

# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />

# OF STUDENTS: 100 GRADE(S) 9-12<br />

DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 10/17-11/19/11<br />

NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />

STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 X STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />

1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />

1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />

1.<br />

2.<br />

3.<br />

4.<br />

5.<br />

6.<br />

STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />

ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />

EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />

ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />

TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />

QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

N/<br />

7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />

BILL TEACHES SET BUILDING TO A LARGE CREW OF STUDENTS. HE<br />

TEACHES LEADERSHIP.<br />

8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />

NONE<br />

9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />

IT WAS WONDERFUL TO HAVE THE STUDENTS LEARN BUILDING<br />

SKILLS AND THE USE OF TOOLS AND SKILLS THEY WILL HAVE AS<br />

THEY LEAVE HIGH SCHOOL.<br />

1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />

2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />

3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />

4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />

5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />

6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />

7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />

NONE<br />

8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />

NONE<br />

9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />

NONE<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

ARTIST: WILLIAM BUMBOLOW<br />

CONTRACT #: A8322<br />

TITLE OF PROGRAM: LIGHTING DESIGNER FOR THE SPRING MUSICAL - MY<br />

FAIR LADY<br />

TYPE OF PROGRAM: RESIDENCY<br />

DISTRICT/ SCHOOL: LAKELAND/WALTER PANAS HIGH SCHOOL<br />

# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />

# OF STUDENTS: 200 GRADE(S) 9-12<br />

DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 3/5-5/5/12<br />

NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />

STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 X STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />

ARTIST: WILLIAM CONWAY<br />

CONTRACT #: A8532<br />

TITLE OF PROGRAM: BASS PLAYER FOR THE SHOW - ONCE UPON A<br />

MATTRESS<br />

TYPE OF PROGRAM: ASSEMBLY<br />

DISTRICT/ SCHOOL:<br />

# OF TEACHERS: 2<br />

SOMERS/SOMERS HIGH SCHOOL<br />

# OF STUDENTS: 50 GRADE(S) 9-12<br />

DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 3/12-18/12<br />

NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />

STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />

1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />

1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />

1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />

2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />

3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />

4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />

5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />

6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />

2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />

3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />

4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />

5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />

6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM?<br />

NONE<br />

Y<br />

WHY?<br />

7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM?<br />

NONE<br />

Y<br />

WHY?<br />

8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />

NONE<br />

9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />

NONE<br />

8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />

NONE<br />

9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />

NONE<br />

Arts in Education Service - School Evaluations <strong>2011</strong>-<strong>2012</strong><br />

Page 325 of 332


ARTIST:<br />

WINGSPAN ARTS, INC.<br />

CONTRACT #: A7784<br />

TITLE OF PROGRAM: ANNE MCALEXANDER WISE, ALEX WISE & DEVAN<br />

HIBBARD WORK WITH STUDENTS TO PERFORM THE<br />

SHOW - HONK<br />

TYPE OF PROGRAM: RESIDENCY<br />

DISTRICT/ SCHOOL:<br />

NEW ROCHELLE/TRINITY ELEM. SCHOOL<br />

# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />

# OF STUDENTS: 36 GRADE(S) 4 & 5<br />

DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE<br />

12/2/11-2/3/12<br />

NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />

STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 X STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />

ARTIST: YALE ALLEY CATS<br />

CONTRACT #: A8824<br />

TITLE OF PROGRAM: A CAPPELLA GROUP<br />

TYPE OF PROGRAM: ASSEMBLY<br />

DISTRICT/ SCHOOL: KATONAH/LEWISBORO/JOHN JAY HIGH SCHOOL<br />

# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />

# OF STUDENTS: 258 GRADE(S) 9-12<br />

DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 4/25/12<br />

NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />

STANDARD 1 STANDARD 2 STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4 X<br />

1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />

1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />

1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />

2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />

3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />

4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />

5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />

6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />

7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />

EXCELLENT PROFESSIONAL JOB.<br />

8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />

NONE<br />

9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />

NONE<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />

2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />

3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />

4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />

5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />

6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />

7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />

GREAT GROUP. GOOD INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS.<br />

8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />

NONE<br />

9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />

NONE<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

ARTIST: YALE ALLEY CATS<br />

CONTRACT #: A8813<br />

TITLE OF PROGRAM: A CAPPELLA GROUP<br />

TYPE OF PROGRAM: ASSEMBLY<br />

DISTRICT/ SCHOOL: KATONAH/LEWISBORO/INCREASE MILLER ELEM.<br />

# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />

# OF STUDENTS: GRADE(S) K-5<br />

DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 4/23/12<br />

NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />

STANDARD 1 STANDARD 2 STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4 X<br />

ARTIST: YES, YOU CAN!, INC.<br />

CONTRACT #: A7769<br />

TITLE OF PROGRAM: LLOYD BACHRACH - MOTIVATIONAL SHOW<br />

TYPE OF PROGRAM: ASSEMBLY<br />

DISTRICT/ SCHOOL:<br />

# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />

MTP/WESTLAKE MIDDLE SCHOOL<br />

# OF STUDENTS: 330 GRADE(S) 7 & 8<br />

DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 11/3/11<br />

NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />

STANDARD 1 STANDARD 2 STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />

1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />

1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />

1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />

2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />

3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />

4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />

5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />

6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />

7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />

THEY WERE ENTHUSIASTIC, ENERGETIC AND OF COURSE<br />

TALENTED. THEY HELD THE STUDENTS' INTEREST WITH THE<br />

UNIQUENESS AND VARIETY EVIDENT IN THEIR PROGRAM.<br />

8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />

NONE<br />

9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />

NONE<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

N/<br />

1.<br />

2.<br />

3.<br />

4.<br />

5.<br />

6.<br />

STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />

ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />

EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />

ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />

TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />

QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />

LLOYD WAS A WONDERFULLY ENGAGING AND MOTIVATIONAL<br />

SPEAKER/STORYTELLER. STUDENTS WERE HIGHLY IMPRESSED AS<br />

WERE THE TEACHERS.<br />

8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />

NONE<br />

9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />

NONE<br />

Arts in Education Service - School Evaluations <strong>2011</strong>-<strong>2012</strong><br />

Page 326 of 332


ARTIST: YORKTOWN THEATRE COMPANY CONTRACT #: A8494<br />

TITLE OF PROGRAM: GINA NOTO CHOREOGRAPHER & STEVE LOFTUS SET<br />

DESIGNER FOR THE SHOW - ANNIE JR.<br />

TYPE OF PROGRAM: RESIDENCY<br />

DISTRICT/ SCHOOL: CHAPPAQUA/WESTORCHARD ELEM.<br />

# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />

# OF STUDENTS: 1015 GRADE(S) 2-4<br />

DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 4/16-29/12<br />

NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />

STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 X STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />

1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />

ARTIST: YORKTOWN THEATRE COMPANY CONTRACT #: A8678<br />

TITLE OF PROGRAM: REBECCA STERN CHOREOGRAPHER, STEVE<br />

LOFTUS & BILL BROWN - SET DESIGNERS FOR THE<br />

SHOW - PETER PAN<br />

TYPE OF PROGRAM: RESIDENCY<br />

DISTRICT/ SCHOOL:<br />

CHAPPAQUA/ROARING BROOK ELEM.<br />

# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />

# OF STUDENTS: 113 GRADE(S) 2-4<br />

DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 5/21-6/3/12<br />

NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />

STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 X STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />

1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />

1.<br />

2.<br />

3.<br />

4.<br />

5.<br />

6.<br />

STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />

ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />

EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />

ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />

TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />

QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

N/<br />

7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />

THE STUDENTS LOVED THE DANCE, COSTUMES, AND SETS WHICH<br />

WERE ESPECIALLY EXCITING FOR THE STUDENTS. THE ENTIRE<br />

PROGRAM WAS FABULOUS.<br />

8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />

NONE<br />

9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />

NONE<br />

1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />

2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />

3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />

4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />

5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />

6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />

7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />

WONDERFUL SHOW AND GREAT EXPERIENCE FOR ALL CAST<br />

MEMEBERS.<br />

8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />

NONE<br />

9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />

NONE<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

ARTIST: YORKTOWN THEATRE COMPANY CONTRACT #: A8120<br />

TITLE OF PROGRAM: STEVEN LOFTUS - SET DESIGNER & JOHN FANELLI -<br />

COSTUME DESIGNER FOR SHOW - SEUSSICAL<br />

TYPE OF PROGRAM: RESIDENCY<br />

DISTRICT/ SCHOOL: CHAPPAQUA/SEVEN BRIDGES MIDDLE SCHOOL<br />

# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />

# OF STUDENTS: 103 GRADE(S) 5-8<br />

DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 1/30-2/12/12<br />

NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />

STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 X STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />

ARTIST: YORKTOWN THEATRE COMPANY CONTRACT #: A8127<br />

TITLE OF PROGRAM: SUSAN ZIPPERMAN - COSTUMES & STEVE LOFTUS -<br />

SET DESIGNER FOR THE SHOW - FOOTLOOSE<br />

TYPE OF PROGRAM: RESIDENCY<br />

DISTRICT/ SCHOOL: CHAPPAQUA/BELL MIDDLE SCHOOL<br />

# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />

# OF STUDENTS: GRADE(S) 5-8<br />

DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 3/5-25/12<br />

NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />

STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 X STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />

1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />

1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />

1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />

2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />

3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />

4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />

5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />

6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />

7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />

UTILIZING AND OPERATING HIGH CALIBER SETS AND COSTUMES<br />

GAVE STUDENTS A REAL SENSE OF ACCOMPLISHMENT.<br />

8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />

NONE<br />

9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />

NONE<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />

2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />

3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />

4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />

5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />

6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />

7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />

IT IS AN AMAZING PROGRAM.<br />

8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />

NONE<br />

9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />

NONE<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

N/<br />

Arts in Education Service - School Evaluations <strong>2011</strong>-<strong>2012</strong><br />

Page 327 of 332


ARTIST: YOUNG AT ARTS<br />

CONTRACT #: A7700<br />

TITLE OF PROGRAM: SHARYL PIRTLE & VAUGHN MAUREN - MUSICAL<br />

THEATRE<br />

TYPE OF PROGRAM: WORKSHOP<br />

DISTRICT/ SCHOOL: EASTCHESTER/ANNE HUTCHINSON ELEM.<br />

# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />

# OF STUDENTS: GRADE(S) 3-5<br />

DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 10/6-12/16/12<br />

NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />

STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 X STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />

1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />

ARTIST: YOUNG AT ARTS<br />

CONTRACT #: A8460<br />

TITLE OF PROGRAM: SHARYN PIRTLE - DIRECTOR<br />

TYPE OF PROGRAM: ASSEMBLY/WORKSHOP<br />

DISTRICT/ SCHOOL: EASTCHESTER/ANNE HUTCHINSON ELEM.<br />

# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />

# OF STUDENTS: 350 GRADE(S) 3-5<br />

DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 2/2-5/19/12<br />

NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />

STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />

1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />

1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />

2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />

3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />

4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />

5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />

6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />

7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />

SHE WAS VERY KNOWLEDGEABLE AND INTERACTIVE WITH THE<br />

STUDENTS.<br />

8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />

NONE<br />

9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />

NONE<br />

5<br />

5<br />

4<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />

2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />

3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />

4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />

5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />

6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />

7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />

THEY WERE VERY PROFESSIONAL. THE STUDENTS LEARNED A<br />

LOT. THEY SANG, DANCED, ACTED AND DID SEVERAL<br />

PERFORMANCES.<br />

8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />

NONE<br />

9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />

THE STUDENTS WERE VERY INVOLVED MOST OF THE TIME AND THE<br />

INTERACTION WAS GREAT.<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

ARTIST: YOUNG AUDIENCES OF CONNECTICUT CONTRACT #: A7866<br />

TITLE OF PROGRAM: SORO BINDI - AFRICAN DANCER<br />

TYPE OF PROGRAM: ASSEMBLY<br />

DISTRICT/ SCHOOL:<br />

# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />

WHITE PLAINS/POST ROAD ELEM.<br />

# OF STUDENTS: 22 GRADE(S) K-5<br />

DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 10/21/11<br />

NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />

STANDARD 1 STANDARD 2 STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4 X<br />

ARTIST: YOUNG AUDIENCES OF NEW JERSEY CONTRACT #: A7813<br />

TITLE OF PROGRAM: MARK LOHR - HOOKED ON BOOKS<br />

TYPE OF PROGRAM: ASSEMBLY<br />

DISTRICT/ SCHOOL: CHAPPAQUA/WESTORCHARD ELEM.<br />

# OF TEACHERS: 5<br />

# OF STUDENTS: 515 GRADE(S) K-4<br />

DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 6/12/12<br />

NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />

STANDARD 1 STANDARD 2 STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />

1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />

1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />

1.<br />

2.<br />

3.<br />

4.<br />

5.<br />

6.<br />

STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />

ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />

EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />

ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />

TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />

QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

N/<br />

7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />

THIS WAS AN INTERACTIVE MUSICAL, RHYTHM PERFORMANCE. HE<br />

INVOLVED STUDENTS AND CAPTURED STUDENT ATTENTION.<br />

8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />

NONE<br />

9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />

VERY IMPRESSIVE.<br />

1.<br />

2.<br />

3.<br />

4.<br />

5.<br />

6.<br />

STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />

ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />

EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />

ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />

TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />

QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />

4<br />

5<br />

4<br />

5<br />

4<br />

N/<br />

7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />

IT WAS FABULOUS. VERY ENGAGING YET THE STUDENTS CLEARLY<br />

GOT THE MESSAGE OF THE SHOW.<br />

8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />

NONE<br />

9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />

LOVED IT - GREAT SHOW.<br />

Arts in Education Service - School Evaluations <strong>2011</strong>-<strong>2012</strong><br />

Page 328 of 332


ARTIST: YOUNG AUDIENCES OF NEW YORK CONTRACT #: A8002C<br />

TITLE OF PROGRAM: FERABA - AFRICAN RHYTHM TAP<br />

TYPE OF PROGRAM: ASSEMBLY<br />

DISTRICT/ SCHOOL: NEW ROCHELLE/ISAAC YOUNG MIDDLE SCHOOL<br />

# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />

# OF STUDENTS: GRADE(S) 7<br />

DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 2/15/12<br />

NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />

STANDARD 1 STANDARD 2 STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4 X<br />

ARTIST: YOUNG AUDIENCES OF NEW YORK CONTRACT #: A8002B<br />

TITLE OF PROGRAM: KLEZMERFEST SHOW<br />

TYPE OF PROGRAM: ASSEMBLY<br />

DISTRICT/ SCHOOL: NEW ROCHELLE/ISAAC YOUNG MIDDLE SCHOOL<br />

# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />

# OF STUDENTS: 250 GRADE(S) 6<br />

DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 1/20/12<br />

NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />

STANDARD 1 STANDARD 2 STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4 X<br />

1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />

1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />

1.<br />

2.<br />

3.<br />

4.<br />

5.<br />

6.<br />

STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />

ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />

EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />

ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />

TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />

QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />

ALWAYS A GREAT EXPERIENCE FOR THE STUDENTS. THE ARTISTS<br />

ARE ALWAYS SO WELL PREPARED.<br />

8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />

NONE<br />

9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />

GREAT PROGRAM. THE STUDENTS LOVED IT.<br />

1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />

2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />

3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />

4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />

5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />

6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />

7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />

IT WAS GREAT!<br />

8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />

NONE<br />

9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />

GREAT PROGRAM. THE STUDENTS LOVED IT.<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

ARTIST: YOUNG AUDIENCES OF NEW YORK CONTRACT #: A7818<br />

TITLE OF PROGRAM: ROOTS OF SALSA<br />

TYPE OF PROGRAM: ASSEMBLY<br />

DISTRICT/ SCHOOL: NEW ROCHELLE/WARD ELEM. SCHOOL<br />

# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />

# OF STUDENTS: 100 GRADE(S) K-5<br />

DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 10/14/11<br />

NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />

STANDARD 1 STANDARD 2 STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4 X<br />

ARTIST: YOUNG AUDIENCES OF NEW YORK CONTRACT #: A8002A<br />

TITLE OF PROGRAM: SLAM 101: VERBAL COMBAT / POETRY SLAM<br />

TYPE OF PROGRAM: ASSEMBLY<br />

DISTRICT/ SCHOOL: NEW ROCHELLE/ISAAC YOUNG MIDDLE SCHOOL<br />

# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />

# OF STUDENTS: 250 GRADE(S) 8<br />

DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 11/30/11<br />

NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />

STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />

1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />

1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />

1.<br />

2.<br />

3.<br />

4.<br />

5.<br />

6.<br />

STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />

ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />

EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />

ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />

TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />

QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />

2<br />

1<br />

1<br />

1<br />

4<br />

N/<br />

7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? N WHY?<br />

ROOTS OF SALSA WAS NOT AT ALL WHAT WE EXPECTED. WE<br />

EXPECTED AN ENERGETIC DISPLAY OF SALSA WITH AN AGE<br />

APPROPRIATE EXPLANATION OF THE ROOTS. LESS SPEAKING AND<br />

MORE DEMONSTRATION. BETTER CONTROL OF THE<br />

PERFORMANCE.<br />

8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />

NONE<br />

9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />

DURING OUR SHOW, THE PERFORMERS LOST THE ATTENTION OF<br />

OUR LITTLE ONES. UNFORTUNATELY THEY SNAPPED AT THE<br />

CHILDREN. THIS WAS UNACCEPTABLE. THEY INVITED ALL OF THE<br />

CHILDREN ON STAGE CAUSING AN UNSAFE CONDITION.<br />

1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />

2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />

3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />

4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />

5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />

6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />

7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />

NONE<br />

8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />

NONE<br />

9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />

GREAT PROGRAM.<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

Arts in Education Service - School Evaluations <strong>2011</strong>-<strong>2012</strong><br />

Page 329 of 332


ARTIST: YOUTH TO YOUTH INTERNATIONAL CONTRACT #: A7942<br />

TITLE OF PROGRAM: SHAUN DERIK - DREAMSONG<br />

TYPE OF PROGRAM: ASSEMBLY<br />

DISTRICT/ SCHOOL: KATONAH/LEWISBORO/JOHN JAY MIDDLE & HIGH SCH<br />

# OF TEACHERS: 5<br />

# OF STUDENTS: 100 GRADE(S) 6-12<br />

DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 11/9/11<br />

NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />

STANDARD 1 STANDARD 2 STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />

ARTIST: YVETTE RUGASAGUHUNGA<br />

CONTRACT #: A7808<br />

TITLE OF PROGRAM: LESSONS OF THE PAST, HOPE FOR THE FUTURE<br />

TYPE OF PROGRAM: ASSEMBLY<br />

DISTRICT/ SCHOOL: CHAPPAQUA/BELL MIDDLE SCHOOL<br />

# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />

# OF STUDENTS: 170 GRADE(S) 8<br />

DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 2/16/12<br />

NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />

STANDARD 1 STANDARD 2 STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />

1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />

1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />

1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />

2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />

3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />

4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />

5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />

6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />

7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />

NONE<br />

8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />

IT WOULD HAVE BEEN HELPFUL IF WE HAD KNOWN WHAT SOUND<br />

EQUIPMENT AND INSTRUMENTS, ETC. HE NEEDED AT LEAST 2<br />

WEEKS PRIOR TO THE SHOW. WE WOULD HAVE HAD THE PIANO<br />

TUNED.<br />

9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />

NONE<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

N/<br />

1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />

2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />

3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />

4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />

5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />

6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />

7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />

YVETTE DOES A WONDERFUL JOB.<br />

8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />

NONE<br />

9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />

NONE<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

ARTIST: ZACHARY LIPTON<br />

CONTRACT #: A8725<br />

TITLE OF PROGRAM: JAZZ QUARTET<br />

TYPE OF PROGRAM: ASSEMBLY/WORKSHOP<br />

DISTRICT/ SCHOOL: NEW ROCHELLE/NEW ROCHELLE HS<br />

# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />

# OF STUDENTS: 250 GRADE(S) 9-12<br />

DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 4/19/12<br />

NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />

STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4 X<br />

ARTIST: ZACHARY WILLIS<br />

CONTRACT #: A7750<br />

TITLE OF PROGRAM: IMPROVISSTIONAL THEATRE<br />

TYPE OF PROGRAM: WORKSHOP<br />

DISTRICT/ SCHOOL: KATONAH/LEWISBORO/JOHN JAY HIGH SCHOOL<br />

# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />

# OF STUDENTS: 20 GRADE(S) 9-12<br />

DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 11/17/11<br />

NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />

STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />

1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />

1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />

1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />

2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />

3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />

4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />

5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />

6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />

7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />

ALL 4 MUSICIANS WERE EXCELLENT BUT WERE ALSO ABLE TO<br />

COMMUNICATE TO THE AUDIENCE AND HOLD EVERYONE'S<br />

ATTENTION. A TERRIFIC PERFORMANCE WITH ADDITIONAL<br />

DISCUSSION ABOUT THE HISTORY OF JAZZ AND HOW A<br />

PERFORMANCE IS PUT TOGETHER.<br />

8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />

WITHOUT MICROPHONES, SOME OF THE DIALOGUE WAS DIFFICULT<br />

TO HEAR IN ALL PARTS OF THE THEATRE.<br />

9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />

HIGHLY RECOMMENDED.<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

4<br />

3<br />

1.<br />

2.<br />

3.<br />

4.<br />

5.<br />

6.<br />

STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />

ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />

EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />

ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />

TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />

QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />

IMPROV IS A GREAT TOOL FOR COMMUNITY BUILDING IN THE<br />

CLASSROOM. IT INVITED STUDENTS TO USE THEIR IMAGINATIONS<br />

AND TO IMPROVE LISTENING SKILLS AND ENCOURAGED THEM TO<br />

THINK ON THEIR FEET.<br />

8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />

PROVIDE A LIST OF READING. (ZACK SAID HE'D PROVIDE THIS)<br />

9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />

ZACK GAVE INDIVIDUALIZED ATTENTION TO EACH OF THE<br />

STUDENTS WHO WERE PARTICIPATING. HIS FEEDBACK WAS<br />

INCISIVE, BUT ENCOURAGING AS A RESULT STUDENTS OPENED UP<br />

AND MADE CHANGES IN THEIR IMPROV GAME.<br />

Arts in Education Service - School Evaluations <strong>2011</strong>-<strong>2012</strong><br />

Page 330 of 332


ARTIST: ZEV HABER<br />

CONTRACT #: A8355<br />

TITLE OF PROGRAM: GUITAR<br />

TYPE OF PROGRAM: WORKSHOP<br />

DISTRICT/ SCHOOL:<br />

# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />

PELHAM/SIWANOY ELEM.<br />

# OF STUDENTS: 7 GRADE(S) 1 & 2<br />

DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 1/30-3/26/12<br />

NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />

STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 X STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />

ARTIST: ZEV HABER<br />

CONTRACT #: A7608A<br />

TITLE OF PROGRAM: GUITAR I<br />

TYPE OF PROGRAM: WORKSHOP<br />

DISTRICT/ SCHOOL:<br />

# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />

PELHAM/SIWANOY ELEM.<br />

# OF STUDENTS: 9 GRADE(S) 1 & 2<br />

DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 10/3-12/5/11<br />

NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />

STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 X STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />

1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />

1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />

1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />

2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />

3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />

4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />

5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />

6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />

4<br />

4<br />

4<br />

4<br />

4<br />

4<br />

1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />

2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />

3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />

4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />

5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />

6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

4<br />

5<br />

7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM?<br />

NONE<br />

Y<br />

WHY?<br />

7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM?<br />

NONE<br />

Y<br />

WHY?<br />

8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />

NONE<br />

9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />

NONE<br />

8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />

NONE<br />

9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />

NONE<br />

ARTIST: ZEV HABER<br />

CONTRACT #: A7608B<br />

TITLE OF PROGRAM: GUITAR II<br />

TYPE OF PROGRAM: WORKSHOP<br />

DISTRICT/ SCHOOL:<br />

# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />

PELHAM/SIWANOY ELEM.<br />

# OF STUDENTS: 9 GRADE(S) 3-5<br />

DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 10/4-11/29/11<br />

NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />

STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 X STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />

ARTIST: ZEV HABER<br />

CONTRACT #: A8057B<br />

TITLE OF PROGRAM: MAKE YOUR OWN CD<br />

TYPE OF PROGRAM: WORKSHOP<br />

DISTRICT/ SCHOOL:<br />

# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />

PELHAM/PROSPECT HILL ELEM.<br />

# OF STUDENTS: 10 GRADE(S) 3-5<br />

DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 1/13-3/9/12<br />

NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />

STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 X STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />

1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />

1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />

1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />

2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />

3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />

4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />

5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />

6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />

2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />

3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />

4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />

5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />

6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM?<br />

NONE<br />

Y<br />

WHY?<br />

7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM?<br />

NONE<br />

Y<br />

WHY?<br />

8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />

NONE<br />

9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />

NONE<br />

8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />

NONE<br />

9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />

NONE<br />

Arts in Education Service - School Evaluations <strong>2011</strong>-<strong>2012</strong><br />

Page 331 of 332


ARTIST: ZEV HABER<br />

CONTRACT #: A8057A<br />

TITLE OF PROGRAM: MUSIC WITH ZEV<br />

TYPE OF PROGRAM: WORKSHOP<br />

DISTRICT/ SCHOOL:<br />

# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />

PELHAM/PROSPECT HILL ELEM.<br />

# OF STUDENTS: 9 GRADE(S) K-2<br />

DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 1/11-3/7/12<br />

NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />

STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 X STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />

ARTIST: ZUCCHINI BROTHERS<br />

CONTRACT #: A8679<br />

TITLE OF PROGRAM: CHARACTER ED MUSICAL SHOW<br />

TYPE OF PROGRAM: ASSEMBLY<br />

DISTRICT/ SCHOOL:<br />

# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />

TARRYTOWN/W. L. MORSE ELEM.<br />

# OF STUDENTS: 238 GRADE(S) 1<br />

DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 6/8/12<br />

NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />

STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />

1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />

1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />

1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />

2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />

3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />

4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />

5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />

6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />

7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />

NONE<br />

8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />

NONE<br />

9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />

NONE<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

1.<br />

2.<br />

3.<br />

4.<br />

5.<br />

6.<br />

STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />

ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />

EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />

ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />

TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />

QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />

DYNAMIC, ENTERTAINING, CHILD FRIENDLY AND VERY RELIABLE.<br />

8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />

NONE<br />

9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />

WE LOVED THEM.<br />

Arts in Education Service - School Evaluations <strong>2011</strong>-<strong>2012</strong><br />

Page 332 of 332

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!