2011-2012 - Boces
2011-2012 - Boces
2011-2012 - Boces
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
ARTS IN EDUCATION<br />
P/NW BOCES, 200 BOCES DRIVE, YORKTOWN HEIGHTS, NY 10598<br />
914/248-2349 - fax # 914/248-3838 - email # msherer@pnwboces.org<br />
WEBSITE: http://www.pnwboces.org/artsined/<br />
MICHELLE SHERER - ARTS COORDINATOR<br />
Summer, <strong>2012</strong><br />
Dear ARTS Representatives:<br />
This School Program Evaluation Book has been compiled from all the in-school Arts programs/events that<br />
were contracted through the Putnam/Northern Westchester Arts In Education Service during the 201-<strong>2012</strong><br />
school year.<br />
HOW TO USE:<br />
1. The Evaluations are in alphabetical order either by the first name or by the name of the<br />
company/organization.<br />
2. The Evaluations were completed by participants who viewed the presentations.<br />
3. In the majority of cases, there is at least one Evaluation for each in-school program/event.<br />
4. In few cases, where several Evaluations were received for a single program/event, the responses were<br />
combined and averaged out for each of the categories but all the comments were included. However,<br />
those Evaluations when the respondents’ views were widely different have been entered separately.<br />
If you have any questions, please feel free to contact me at: 914/248-2349 or email msherer@pnwboces.org<br />
I’m looking forward to another successful year working with you.<br />
Very truly yours,<br />
Michelle Sherer <br />
Arts In Education Coordinator
PUTNAM/NORTHERN WESTCHESTER BOCES<br />
ARTS IN EDUCATION SERVICE<br />
<strong>2011</strong>-<strong>2012</strong> SCHOOL’S EVALUATION FORM<br />
TO BE COMPLETED BY SCHOOL CONTRACT #A - .<br />
NAME OF EVALUATOR:___________________________________________________ POSITION:_________________________<br />
NAME OF ARTIST: _______________________________________________ DATE OF PROGRAM:________________________<br />
NAME OF PROGRAM:_________________________________________________________________________________________<br />
DISTRICT: ____________________________________________ BUILDING:____________________________________________<br />
# OF TEACHERS<br />
# OF STUDENTS GRADE DOING THIS<br />
ATTENDING: _______________ LEVEL(S): __________________ EVALUATION:_________________<br />
YOU MUST CHECK A STANDARD AND THE ART FORM(S) OF THE PROGRAM<br />
(check all that apply)<br />
Art Standards 1. { } Creating, Performing and Participating in the Arts<br />
2. { } Knowing and Using Arts Materials and Resources<br />
3. { } Responding to and Analyzing Various Works of Art<br />
4. { } Understanding the Cultural Contributions of the Arts<br />
(SEE A COPY OF THE LEARNING STANDARDS FOR THE ARTS FOR MORE INDEPTH DESCRIPTIONS)<br />
Art Form(s) In-School Out of School:<br />
Music____ Assembly____ Tour____<br />
Dance/Movement___ Workshop____ Tickets____<br />
Drama/Theatre Arts____ Residency____ Field Trip____<br />
Literature/Writing____ # of Sessions____ Other_______________<br />
Storytelling____ Other_______________ _______________<br />
Visual Arts____<br />
_______________<br />
Media Arts____<br />
Please rate the program according to the criteria listed below. Use a rating of l - 5 points.<br />
1=POOR, 2=FAIR, 3=GOOD, 4=VERY GOOD, 5=EXCELLENT<br />
1. STUDENT RESPONSE<br />
Artist engaged students' interest and attention; Applause and laughter was genuine and<br />
enthusiastic; Restlessness was minimal; When invited to participate, students were eager,<br />
questions to artist indicated that students understood the presentation.<br />
2. ARTISTIC QUALITY<br />
Artist demonstrated skill and dedication to their art; Repertoire was appropriate and well<br />
chosen for students' age and interest levels; Art form was presented in an attractive, enjoyable,<br />
artistic manner.<br />
3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY<br />
Artist helped students to understand aspects of the creative process; Artist related their art<br />
form and repertoire to students' context and real life experiences; Relationships between art<br />
form and other curriculum areas were elucidated; Artist helped children to see/hear with<br />
discrimination.<br />
<strong>2011</strong>-<strong>2012</strong> SCHOOL’S EVALUATION FORM<br />
_______<br />
_______<br />
_______<br />
more on other side
4. ARTIST' INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS<br />
Artist appeared to genuinely enjoy working with children; Artist encouraged students to<br />
participate in the program and helped them do so in a meaningful way; Artist listened during<br />
students' question and answer period; Artist used vocabulary which were within the grasp<br />
of students.<br />
5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM<br />
Speakers could be easily heard; performers could be seen; Lighting, props and sound<br />
effects were effective; Costumes were imaginative, colorful and appropriate; Elements of<br />
surprise and humor were included in presentation; Program was well-paced; Performers<br />
began and ended on time.<br />
6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDES/SUPPORT MATERIALS<br />
Materials were provided for teachers and/or students; They were attractive, well designed<br />
and clear; Materials arrived at least two weeks before the program; Materials included<br />
suggestions for teachers which were helpful in preparing students for program; Follow-up<br />
activities were provided; Guide included information about the artist, the repertoire,<br />
vocabulary terms, bibliography, resources for teachers and students .<br />
_______<br />
_______<br />
_______<br />
7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM TO OTHER SCHOOL DISTRICTS? _______<br />
PLEASE EXPLAIN: ________________________________________________________________________<br />
__________________________________________________________________________________________<br />
__________________________________________________________________________________________<br />
8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTISTS FOR IMPROVEMENT: ________________________________________<br />
__________________________________________________________________________________________<br />
__________________________________________________________________________________________<br />
9. OTHER COMMENTS: ____________________________________________________________________<br />
__________________________________________________________________________________________<br />
__________________________________________________________________________________________<br />
PLEASE NOTE:<br />
We cannot generate payment to the artist/organization until we receive this<br />
completed evaluation form from your school. Please return this form as soon as<br />
possible after the program. Send it to:<br />
Michelle Sherer<br />
Arts in Education Coordinator<br />
Putnam/Northern Westchester BOCES<br />
200 BOCES Drive<br />
Yorktown Heights, NY 10598-4399<br />
Phone # 914/248-2349 - Fax # 914/248-3838 OR 248-2390<br />
msherer@pnwboces.org - http://pnwboces.org/artsined
ARTIST: 2 HANDS 2 LEARN CONTRACT #: A8636<br />
TITLE OF PROGRAM: JUDY LEWIS - COLONIAL PAPER MAKING<br />
TYPE OF PROGRAM: WORKSHOP<br />
DISTRICT/ SCHOOL:<br />
# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />
CROTON/CET ELEM.<br />
# OF STUDENTS: GRADE(S) 4<br />
DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 6/7-11/12<br />
NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />
STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 X STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4 X<br />
ARTIST: 2 HANDS 2 LEARN CONTRACT #: A8795<br />
TITLE OF PROGRAM: JUDY LEWIS - COLONIAL PAPER MAKING<br />
TYPE OF PROGRAM: WORKSHOP<br />
DISTRICT/ SCHOOL: NEW ROCHELLE/TRINITY ELEM. SCHOOL<br />
# OF TEACHERS: 3<br />
# OF STUDENTS: 150 GRADE(S) 4<br />
DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 6/14-18/12<br />
NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />
STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 X STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4 X<br />
1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />
1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />
1.<br />
2.<br />
3.<br />
4.<br />
5.<br />
6.<br />
STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />
ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />
EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />
ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />
TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />
QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />
4<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />
FANTASTIC AND APPROPRIATE PROGRAM. AMY WAS VERY<br />
KNOWLEDGEABLE AND DID A FANTASTIC JOB.<br />
8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />
A 3RD STATION, TO LIMIT DOWN TIME FOR STUDENTS WHO FINISH.<br />
9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />
THE TEACHERS WERE DISAPPOINTED WITH THE VOLUNTEER WHO<br />
HELPED OUT.<br />
1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />
2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />
3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />
4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />
5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />
6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />
7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />
NONE<br />
8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />
NONE<br />
9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />
NONE<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
ARTIST: 2 HANDS 2 LEARN CONTRACT #: A7793<br />
TITLE OF PROGRAM: JUDY LEWIS - EXPLORING OUR FIVE SENSES<br />
TYPE OF PROGRAM: WORKSHOP<br />
DISTRICT/ SCHOOL:<br />
# OF TEACHERS: 5<br />
TUCKAHOE/W. E. COTTLE ELEM.<br />
# OF STUDENTS: 120 GRADE(S) K<br />
DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 1/4 & 5/12<br />
NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />
STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 X STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4 X<br />
ARTIST: 2 HANDS 2 LEARN CONTRACT #: A8861<br />
TITLE OF PROGRAM: JUDY LEWIS - INUIT CULTURES<br />
TYPE OF PROGRAM: WORKSHOP<br />
DISTRICT/ SCHOOL:<br />
# OF TEACHERS: 2<br />
BRIARCLIFF/TODD ELEM.<br />
# OF STUDENTS: 112 GRADE(S) 5<br />
DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 5/31/12<br />
NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />
STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 X STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4 X<br />
1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />
1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />
1.<br />
2.<br />
3.<br />
4.<br />
5.<br />
6.<br />
STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />
ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />
EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />
ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />
TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />
QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />
4<br />
5<br />
5<br />
4<br />
4<br />
5<br />
7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />
THIS WAS A GREAT PROGRAM. THE STUDENTS RESPONDED WELL<br />
TO THE STORIES AND REALLY ENJOYED IT.<br />
8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />
NONE<br />
9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />
THE STUDENTS WERE FULLY ENGAGED THE WHOLE TIME.<br />
1.<br />
2.<br />
3.<br />
4.<br />
5.<br />
6.<br />
STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />
ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />
EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />
ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />
TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />
QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />
3<br />
5<br />
3<br />
5<br />
3<br />
2<br />
7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />
WE LIKE THE TOPIC BUT FEEL THE PRESENTER HAD WEAK<br />
MANAGEMENT SKILLS. ALSO NEED A BETTER OUTLINE OF WHAT IS<br />
TO BE COVERED AND HOW.<br />
8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />
NONE<br />
9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />
STUDENTS WERE ENGAGED IN THE ACTIVITIES.<br />
Arts in Education Service - School Evaluations <strong>2011</strong>-<strong>2012</strong><br />
Page 1 of 332
ARTIST: 2 HANDS 2 LEARN CONTRACT #: A7767<br />
TITLE OF PROGRAM: MARGARET VON DE MEDEN - NATIVE AMERICAN<br />
CULTURES<br />
TYPE OF PROGRAM: WORKSHOP<br />
DISTRICT/ SCHOOL:<br />
# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />
YORKTOWN/MOHANSIC ELEM.<br />
# OF STUDENTS: 220 GRADE(S) K-2<br />
DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 11/1-4/11<br />
NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />
STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 X STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4 X<br />
ARTIST: 2 HANDS 2 LEARN CONTRACT #: A8195<br />
TITLE OF PROGRAM: MARGARET VON DE MEDEN & JULIE MINTER - NATIVE<br />
AMERICAN CULTURES<br />
TYPE OF PROGRAM: WORKSHOP<br />
DISTRICT/ SCHOOL: EASTCHESTER/WAVERLY EARLY CHILDHOOD CTR<br />
# OF TEACHERS: 10 # OF STUDENTS: 224 GRADE(S) 1<br />
DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 11/7-10/11<br />
NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />
STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 X STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4 X<br />
1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />
1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />
1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />
2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />
3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />
4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />
5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />
6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />
7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />
WE HAVE BEEN WORKING WITH THIS GROUP FOR MANY YEARS<br />
AND THEY ARE ALWAYS PROFESSIONAL, INFORMATIVE AND<br />
INTERESTING.<br />
8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />
NONE<br />
9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />
NONE<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />
2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />
3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />
4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />
5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />
6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />
7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />
VERY INFORMATIVE AND AGE APPROPRIATE WITH HANDS-ON<br />
INTERACTIVE ACTIVITIES THAT ARE A STRONG CONTRIBUTOR TO<br />
THE LEARNING PROCESS. THE STUDENTS ARE MOTIVATED, THE<br />
MATERIAL IS RELEVANT TO THE CURRICULUM.<br />
8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />
CONSIDER STUDENTS WITH ALLERGIES TO FOODS SUCH AS<br />
POPCORN , TREE AND PLANT PRODUCTS FOR THE FACE PAINTING<br />
PORTION OF THE PROGRAM.<br />
9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />
GREAT PROGRAM - A KEEPER.<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
ARTIST: 3SCREEN.COM<br />
CONTRACT #: A8478<br />
TITLE OF PROGRAM: I CAN DO THAT MULTI-MEDIA SHOW<br />
TYPE OF PROGRAM: ASSEMBLY<br />
DISTRICT/ SCHOOL: NEW ROCHELLE/DAVIS ELEM. SCHOOL<br />
# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />
# OF STUDENTS: 700 GRADE(S) K-5<br />
DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 3/7/12<br />
NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />
STANDARD 1 STANDARD 2 STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />
ARTIST: A MAZE IN POTTERY, INC.<br />
CONTRACT #: A7547<br />
TITLE OF PROGRAM: AGGIE RADZIK - POTTERY CREATIONS<br />
TYPE OF PROGRAM: WORKSHOP<br />
DISTRICT/ SCHOOL: KATONAH/LEWISBORO/KATONAH ELEM. SCHOOL<br />
# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />
# OF STUDENTS: 9 GRADE(S) K-2<br />
DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 9/23-12/16/11<br />
NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />
STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 X STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4 X<br />
1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />
1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />
1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />
2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />
3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />
4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />
5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />
6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />
4<br />
4<br />
4<br />
5<br />
5<br />
3<br />
1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />
2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />
3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />
4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />
5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />
6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />
4<br />
4<br />
4<br />
4<br />
4<br />
4<br />
7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />
MOTIVATIONAL CHARGED ASSEMBLIES. THIS PROVIDES A<br />
MESSAGE, KINDNESS, HELPING OTHERS IN A COLORFUL AND<br />
ENTERTAINING MANNER.<br />
8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />
THE GUIDE COULD USE SOME "TWEAKS"<br />
9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />
NONE<br />
7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />
CLASSES ARE WELL RUN AND ORGANIZED AND OUR STUDENTS<br />
ALWAYS ENJOY IT.<br />
8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />
NONE<br />
9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />
NONE<br />
Arts in Education Service - School Evaluations <strong>2011</strong>-<strong>2012</strong><br />
Page 2 of 332
ARTIST: AARON SALAZAR<br />
CONTRACT #: A8399<br />
TITLE OF PROGRAM: CHOREOGRAPHER FOR THE SPRING MUSICAL - BYE,<br />
BYE BIRDIE<br />
TYPE OF PROGRAM: RESIDENCY<br />
DISTRICT/ SCHOOL: IRVINGTON/IRVINGTON HIGH SCHOOL<br />
# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />
# OF STUDENTS: 70 GRADE(S) 9-12<br />
DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 1/23-3/17/12<br />
NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />
STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 X STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />
1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />
ARTIST: ACADEMIC ENTERTAINMENT, INC. CONTRACT #: A8564<br />
TITLE OF PROGRAM: 3SCREENS A MULTI MEDIA SHOW - @ MY BEST<br />
TYPE OF PROGRAM: ASSEMBLY<br />
DISTRICT/ SCHOOL:<br />
# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />
YORKTOWN/CROMPOND ELEM.<br />
# OF STUDENTS: 400 GRADE(S) 4 & 5<br />
DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 3/23/12<br />
NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />
STANDARD 1 STANDARD 2 STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />
1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />
1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />
2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />
3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />
4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />
5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />
6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />
7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />
AARON TAUGHT THE STUDENTS A LOT ABOUT DANCE AND WAS<br />
GREAT WITH THOSE WHO HADN'T DANCED BEFORE.<br />
8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />
NONE<br />
9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />
NONE<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
N/<br />
N/<br />
1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />
2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />
3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />
4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />
5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />
6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />
7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />
NONE<br />
8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />
NONE<br />
9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />
NONE<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
ARTIST: ACADEMIC ENTERTAINMENT, INC. CONTRACT #: A7770<br />
TITLE OF PROGRAM: 3SCREENS A MULTI MEDIA SHOW - IMAGES &<br />
MIRAGES<br />
TYPE OF PROGRAM: ASSEMBLY<br />
DISTRICT/ SCHOOL:<br />
# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />
MTP/WESTLAKE MIDDLE SCHOOL<br />
# OF STUDENTS: GRADE(S) 6-8<br />
DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 12/16/11<br />
NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />
STANDARD 1 STANDARD 2 STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />
1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />
ARTIST: ACADEMIC ENTERTAINMENT, INC. CONTRACT #: A7804A<br />
TITLE OF PROGRAM: PATRICK DUNNING - THE SIGNATURE PROJECT<br />
TYPE OF PROGRAM: ASSEMBLY<br />
DISTRICT/ SCHOOL: CHAPPAQUA/BELL MIDDLE SCHOOL<br />
# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />
# OF STUDENTS: 175 GRADE(S) 5<br />
DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 10/17/11<br />
NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />
STANDARD 1 STANDARD 2 STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />
1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />
1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />
2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />
3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />
4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />
5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />
6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />
7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? ? WHY?<br />
A GOOD PROGRAM BUT DISCUSSION MATERIALS WOULD BE<br />
BENEFICIAL.<br />
8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />
BETTER INTRODUCTION AND QUESTIONS WOULD HAVE HELPED<br />
IMPROVE THE PROGRAM.<br />
9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />
NONE<br />
4<br />
3<br />
4<br />
3<br />
5<br />
1<br />
1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />
2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />
3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />
4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />
5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />
6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />
7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />
ONE OF THE BEST PROGRAMS WE HAVE HAD.<br />
8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />
NONE<br />
9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />
NONE<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
N/<br />
Arts in Education Service - School Evaluations <strong>2011</strong>-<strong>2012</strong><br />
Page 3 of 332
ARTIST: ACADEMIC ENTERTAINMENT, INC. CONTRACT #: A7804B<br />
TITLE OF PROGRAM: PATRICK DUNNING - THE SIGNATURE PROJECT<br />
TYPE OF PROGRAM: ASSEMBLY<br />
DISTRICT/ SCHOOL: CHAPPAQUA/SEVEN BRIDGES MIDDLE SCHOOL<br />
# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />
# OF STUDENTS: GRADE(S) 5<br />
DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 11/10/11<br />
NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />
STANDARD 1 STANDARD 2 STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />
ARTIST: ADVENTURE GAME, INC.<br />
CONTRACT #: A8155<br />
TITLE OF PROGRAM: COLONIAL AMERICAN FAIR<br />
TYPE OF PROGRAM: WORKSHOP<br />
DISTRICT/ SCHOOL:<br />
# OF TEACHERS: 7<br />
MTP/COLUMBUS ELEM.<br />
# OF STUDENTS: 160 GRADE(S) 4<br />
DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 2/3/12<br />
NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />
STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 X STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4 X<br />
1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />
1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />
1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />
2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />
3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />
4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />
5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />
6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />
7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />
NONE<br />
8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />
THANKS FOR YOUR PATIENCE.<br />
9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />
SORRY ABOUT THE CONFUSION ON OUR END.<br />
4<br />
5<br />
4<br />
5<br />
5<br />
N/<br />
1.<br />
2.<br />
3.<br />
4.<br />
5.<br />
6.<br />
STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />
ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />
EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />
ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />
TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />
QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
4<br />
5<br />
4<br />
7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />
THIS IS A WONDERFUL WAY FOR STUDENTS TO EXPERIENCE WHAT<br />
THEY HAVE LEARNED BY LIVING IT ALL DAY LONG IN A VARIETY OF<br />
WAYS - HANDS-ON PARTICIPATION IS KEY.<br />
8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />
NONE<br />
9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />
PARENT VOLUNTEERS ARE NEEDED.<br />
ARTIST: ADVENTURE GAME, INC.<br />
CONTRACT #: A7572A<br />
TITLE OF PROGRAM: COLONIAL AMERICAN FAIR<br />
TYPE OF PROGRAM: WORKSHOP<br />
DISTRICT/ SCHOOL: EASTCHESTER/GREENVALE ELEM.<br />
# OF TEACHERS: 5<br />
# OF STUDENTS: 113 GRADE(S) 4<br />
DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 5/31/12<br />
NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />
STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 X STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4 X<br />
ARTIST: ADVENTURE GAME, INC.<br />
CONTRACT #: A8814A<br />
TITLE OF PROGRAM: COLONIAL AMERICAN FAIR<br />
TYPE OF PROGRAM: WORKSHOP<br />
DISTRICT/ SCHOOL: EASTCHESTER/ANNE HUTCHINSON ELEM.<br />
# OF TEACHERS: 3<br />
# OF STUDENTS: 113 GRADE(S) 4<br />
DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 5/7/12<br />
NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />
STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 X STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4 X<br />
1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />
1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />
1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />
2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />
3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />
4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />
5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />
6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />
7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />
THE PROGRAM WAS VERY INTERACTIVE AND THE STUDENTS<br />
ENJOYED IT.<br />
8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />
NONE<br />
9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />
NONE<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />
2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />
3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />
4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />
5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />
6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />
7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />
WONDERFULLY EDUCATIONAL AND INTERACTIVE. THE DAY WAS<br />
GREAT. MY STUDENTS LEARNED SO MUCH WITH ENGAGING,<br />
HANDS-ON EXPERIENCES.<br />
8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />
ASK TEACHERS SPRIOR TO LESSON IF THEY HAVE ANY SENSITIVE<br />
STUDENTS WHO MAY HAVE A DIFFICULT TIME WITH THE DUNCE<br />
CAP AND SIGN - VERY POPULAR STATION THOUGH. YOU MIGHT<br />
CONSIDER DRIED CORN AS AN ADDITIONAL STATION.<br />
9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />
DANCE INSTRUCTION WAS A STRUGGLE. CLEARER DIRECTIONS,<br />
LESS COMPLEX DANCES. THE "PEELING AWAY" WAS CONFUSING<br />
FOR ME TOO.<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
Arts in Education Service - School Evaluations <strong>2011</strong>-<strong>2012</strong><br />
Page 4 of 332
ARTIST: ADVENTURE GAME, INC.<br />
CONTRACT #: A8435<br />
TITLE OF PROGRAM: COLONIAL SPINNING & WEAVING<br />
TYPE OF PROGRAM: ASSEMBLY<br />
DISTRICT/ SCHOOL: LAKELAND/BENJAMIN FRANKLIN ELEM.<br />
# OF TEACHERS: 5<br />
# OF STUDENTS: 100 GRADE(S) 4<br />
DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 3/12/12<br />
NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />
STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 X STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4 X<br />
ARTIST: ADVENTURE GAME, INC.<br />
CONTRACT #: A8814B<br />
TITLE OF PROGRAM: SQUARE DANCING<br />
TYPE OF PROGRAM: WORKSHOP<br />
DISTRICT/ SCHOOL: EASTCHESTER/ANNE HUTCHINSON ELEM.<br />
# OF TEACHERS: 5<br />
# OF STUDENTS: 100 GRADE(S) 5<br />
DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 6/5/12<br />
NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />
STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 X STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4 X<br />
1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />
1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />
1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />
2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />
3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />
4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />
5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />
6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />
2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />
3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />
4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />
5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />
6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
N/<br />
7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM?<br />
NONE<br />
8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />
NONE<br />
9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />
THEY WERE GREAT.<br />
Y<br />
WHY?<br />
7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />
THESE MUSICIANS WER FUN TO WORK WITH. THEY DEFINITELY<br />
UNDERSTOOD THEIR AUDIENCE.<br />
8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />
NONE<br />
9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />
NONE<br />
ARTIST: ADVENTURE GAME, INC.<br />
CONTRACT #: A7572B<br />
TITLE OF PROGRAM: SQUARE DANCING<br />
TYPE OF PROGRAM: WORKSHOP<br />
DISTRICT/ SCHOOL: EASTCHESTER/GREENVALE ELEM.<br />
# OF TEACHERS: 6<br />
# OF STUDENTS: 125 GRADE(S) 5<br />
DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 6/7/12<br />
NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />
STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 X STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4 X<br />
ARTIST: AFRO BRAZIL ARTS, INC.<br />
CONTRACT #: A8876<br />
TITLE OF PROGRAM: CAPOEIRA WORKSHOP<br />
TYPE OF PROGRAM: WORKSHOP<br />
DISTRICT/ SCHOOL:<br />
# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />
ARDSLEY/CONCORD ROAD ELEM.<br />
# OF STUDENTS: 150 GRADE(S) 3<br />
DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 6/19/12<br />
NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />
STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 X STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4 X<br />
1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />
1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />
1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />
2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />
3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />
4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />
5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />
6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />
7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />
STUDENTS HAD A GREAT TIME LEARNING TO SQUARE DANCE.<br />
8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />
NONE<br />
9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />
DANCE TEACHERS WERE SO PROFESSIONAL.<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
N/<br />
1.<br />
2.<br />
3.<br />
4.<br />
5.<br />
6.<br />
STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />
ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />
EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />
ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />
TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />
QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />
THIS WAS A WONDERFUL SUPPLEMENT TO OUR SOCIAL STUDIES<br />
CURRICULUM AS WELL AS OUR FOCUS ON CULTURES<br />
THROUGHTOUT THE WORLD.<br />
8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />
NONE<br />
9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />
I THOUGHT THE PRESENTER'S MANAGEMENT WITH THE CHILDREN<br />
WAS VERY IMPRESSIVE. IT WAS SUPER.<br />
Arts in Education Service - School Evaluations <strong>2011</strong>-<strong>2012</strong><br />
Page 5 of 332
ARTIST: AGOSTINO & CO. PERFORMING ARTS, I<br />
CONTRACT #: A8471<br />
TITLE OF PROGRAM: CHRIS AGOSTINO - TRANSFORMATIONS &<br />
STORYTELLING<br />
TYPE OF PROGRAM: ASSEMBLY<br />
DISTRICT/ SCHOOL: LAKELAND/GEORGE WASHINGTON ELEM.<br />
# OF TEACHERS: 2<br />
# OF STUDENTS: 145 GRADE(S) K-4<br />
DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 2/16/12<br />
NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />
STANDARD 1 STANDARD 2 STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4 X<br />
ARTIST: AGOSTINO & CO. PERFORMING ARTS, I CONTRACT #: A7637<br />
TITLE OF PROGRAM: NED GELFER - JUGGLING, MAGIC & CIRCUS ARTS<br />
SHOW<br />
TYPE OF PROGRAM: ASSEMBLY<br />
DISTRICT/ SCHOOL:<br />
# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />
OSSINING/PARK SCHOOL<br />
# OF STUDENTS: 100 GRADE(S) PRE K &<br />
DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 9/23/11<br />
NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />
STANDARD 1 STANDARD 2 STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />
1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />
1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />
1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />
2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />
3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />
4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />
5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />
6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />
7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />
STUDENTS WERE EXCITED ABOUT THE STORIES TOLD WITH THE<br />
FACE PAINTING.<br />
8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />
NONE<br />
9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />
NONE<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />
2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />
3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />
4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />
5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />
6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />
7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />
NONE<br />
8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />
NONE<br />
9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />
NONE<br />
5<br />
5<br />
N/<br />
5<br />
5<br />
N/<br />
ARTIST: AIJA R. SEARS<br />
CONTRACT #: A8862<br />
TITLE OF PROGRAM: BOTANICAL ART PROGRAM<br />
TYPE OF PROGRAM: RESIDENCY<br />
DISTRICT/ SCHOOL:<br />
# OF TEACHERS: 3<br />
PELHAM/HUTCHINSON ELEM.<br />
# OF STUDENTS: 62 GRADE(S) 4<br />
DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 6/11-19/12<br />
NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />
STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 X STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />
ARTIST: AIJA R. SEARS<br />
CONTRACT #: A8546<br />
TITLE OF PROGRAM: BOTANICAL ART PROGRAM<br />
TYPE OF PROGRAM: RESIDENCY<br />
DISTRICT/ SCHOOL:<br />
# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />
PELHAM/PROSPECT HILL ELEM.<br />
# OF STUDENTS: 75 GRADE(S) 4<br />
DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 4/30-5/11/12<br />
NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />
STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 X STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />
1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />
1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />
1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />
2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />
3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />
4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />
5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />
6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />
7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />
SHE PROVIDED STUDENTS WITH AN IN-DEPTH UNDERSTANDING<br />
AND HANDS-ON APPROACH TO BOTANY.<br />
8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />
NONE.<br />
9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />
AMAZING ARTIST.<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
4<br />
5<br />
1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />
2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />
3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />
4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />
5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />
6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />
7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />
AIJA IS A DELIGHT AND RUNS A FANTASTIC, FUN, INTERESTING<br />
PROGRAM.<br />
8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />
AT TIMES, AIJA'S SOFT VOICE IS LOST AMOUNG THE EXCITEMENT<br />
AND CHATTER. IT WOULD HELP IF SHE WERE TO QUIET EVERYONE<br />
DOWN BEFORE SHE GIVES INSTRUCTION. SHE IS VERY<br />
KNOWLEDGEABLE AND SOMETIMES THE CHILDREN MISS WHAT<br />
SHE IS EXPLAINING BECAUSE THEY DON'T REALIZE SHE IS<br />
ADDRESSING THE CLASS.<br />
9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />
NONE<br />
3<br />
4<br />
4<br />
5<br />
2<br />
5<br />
Arts in Education Service - School Evaluations <strong>2011</strong>-<strong>2012</strong><br />
Page 6 of 332
ARTIST: AIMEE (BYRNE) BREHMER<br />
CONTRACT #: A8440<br />
TITLE OF PROGRAM: CHOREOGRAPHER FOR THE SHOW - A FUNNY THING<br />
HAPPENED ON THE WAY TO THE FORUM<br />
TYPE OF PROGRAM: RESIDENCY<br />
DISTRICT/ SCHOOL: PUTNAM VALLEY/PUTNAM VALLEY HIGH SCHOOL<br />
# OF TEACHERS: 3<br />
# OF STUDENTS: 400 GRADE(S) 9-12<br />
DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 3/3-4/23/12<br />
NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />
STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 X STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />
1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />
ARTIST: ALL FOR KIDZ, INC.<br />
CONTRACT #: A8400<br />
TITLE OF PROGRAM: THE NED SHOW<br />
TYPE OF PROGRAM: ASSEMBLY<br />
DISTRICT/ SCHOOL: KATONAH/LEWISBORO/LEWISBORO ELEM.<br />
# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />
# OF STUDENTS: 350 GRADE(S) K-5<br />
DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 2/16/12<br />
NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />
STANDARD 1 STANDARD 2 STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />
1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />
1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />
2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />
3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />
4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />
5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />
6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />
7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />
NONE<br />
8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />
NONE<br />
9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />
NONE<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />
2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />
3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />
4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />
5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />
6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />
7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />
GREAT PROGRAM AND WONDERFUL MESSAGE.<br />
8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />
HAVE A LITTLE MORE INTERACTION WITH THE AUDIENCE.<br />
9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />
OVERALL VERY ENGAGING AND FUN.<br />
4<br />
3<br />
4<br />
4<br />
3<br />
4<br />
ARTIST: ALLEN J. PERLIN<br />
CONTRACT #: A8251<br />
TITLE OF PROGRAM: COMPOSER FOR THE SHOW - LYSISTRATA<br />
TYPE OF PROGRAM: RESIDENCY<br />
DISTRICT/ SCHOOL: CHAPPAQUA/HORACE GREELEY HIGH SCHOOL<br />
# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />
# OF STUDENTS: 16 GRADE(S) 9-12<br />
DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 1/16-19/12<br />
NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />
STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />
1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />
ARTIST: ALLEN J. PERLIN<br />
CONTRACT #: A8486<br />
TITLE OF PROGRAM: COMPOSER FOR THE SHOW - SIX DEGREES OF<br />
SEPARATION<br />
TYPE OF PROGRAM: RESIDENCY<br />
DISTRICT/ SCHOOL: CHAPPAQUA/HORACE GREELEY HIGH SCHOOL<br />
# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />
# OF STUDENTS: 18 GRADE(S) 9-12<br />
DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 3/5-10/12<br />
NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />
STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />
1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />
1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />
2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />
3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />
4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />
5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />
6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />
7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />
ALLEN IS A TALENTED MUSICIAN.<br />
8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />
NONE<br />
9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />
NONE<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />
2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />
3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />
4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />
5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />
6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />
7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />
AJ IS A TALENTED COMPOSER AND WORKS WELL WITH THE<br />
STUDENTS.<br />
8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />
NONE<br />
9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />
I LOOK FORWARD TO WORKING WITH HIM AGAIN.<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
Arts in Education Service - School Evaluations <strong>2011</strong>-<strong>2012</strong><br />
Page 7 of 332
ARTIST: ALLEN STRAUSS<br />
CONTRACT #: A7864<br />
TITLE OF PROGRAM: BRAIN CHALLENGE TV GAME SHOW<br />
TYPE OF PROGRAM: ASSEMBLY<br />
DISTRICT/ SCHOOL: IRVINGTON/MAIN STREET SCHOOL<br />
# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />
# OF STUDENTS: 260 GRADE(S) 4 & 5<br />
DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 3/22/12<br />
NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />
STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />
ARTIST: ALLEN STRAUSS<br />
CONTRACT #: A7515<br />
TITLE OF PROGRAM: BRAIN CHALLENGE TV GAME SHOW<br />
TYPE OF PROGRAM: ASSEMBLY<br />
DISTRICT/ SCHOOL:<br />
# OF TEACHERS: 5<br />
CHAPPAQUA/GRAFFLIN ELEM.<br />
# OF STUDENTS: 113 GRADE(S) 4<br />
DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 6/18/12<br />
NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />
STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />
1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />
1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />
1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />
2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />
3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />
4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />
5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />
6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />
7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />
THE PRESENTERS ENGAGE THE STUDENTS IN A GAME SHOW<br />
ATMOSPHERE. IT IS BOTH ACADEMIC AND PHYSICAL<br />
CHALLENGES. THE STUDENTS LOVE IT.<br />
8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />
NONE<br />
9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />
THANK YOU FOR BRINGING BRAIN CHALLENGES TO OUR SCHOOL.<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
N/<br />
1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />
2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />
3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />
4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />
5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />
6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />
7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />
EDUCATIONAL AND LOTS OF FUN.<br />
8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />
NONE<br />
9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />
NONE<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
N/<br />
ARTIST: ALLEN STRAUSS<br />
CONTRACT #: A8216<br />
TITLE OF PROGRAM: BRAIN CHALLENGE TV GAME SHOW<br />
TYPE OF PROGRAM: ASSEMBLY<br />
DISTRICT/ SCHOOL: EASTCHESTER/ANNE HUTCHINSON ELEM.<br />
# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />
# OF STUDENTS: 100 GRADE(S) 5<br />
DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 2/3/12<br />
NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />
STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />
ARTIST: ALLEN STRAUSS<br />
CONTRACT #: A7580<br />
TITLE OF PROGRAM: BRAIN CHALLENGE TV GAME SHOW<br />
TYPE OF PROGRAM: ASSEMBLY<br />
DISTRICT/ SCHOOL: BYRAM HILLS/H.C. CRITTENDEN MIDDLE SCHOOL<br />
# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />
# OF STUDENTS: 400 GRADE(S) 6 & 7<br />
DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 2/13/12<br />
NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />
STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />
1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />
1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />
1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />
2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />
3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />
4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />
5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />
6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />
2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />
3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />
4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />
5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />
6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
N/<br />
7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />
SUCH A FUN AND INTERACTIVE PROGRAM. QUESTIONS WERE<br />
CHALLENGING AND ENGAGING.<br />
8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />
NONE<br />
9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />
NONE<br />
7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />
THE CHILDREN ABSOLUTELY LOVED IT. VERY LIVELY AND<br />
EDUCATIONAL.<br />
8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />
NONE<br />
9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />
NONE<br />
Arts in Education Service - School Evaluations <strong>2011</strong>-<strong>2012</strong><br />
Page 8 of 332
ARTIST: ALLEN STRAUSS<br />
CONTRACT #: A8418<br />
TITLE OF PROGRAM: BRAIN CHALLENGE TV GAME SHOW<br />
TYPE OF PROGRAM: ASSEMBLY<br />
DISTRICT/ SCHOOL:<br />
# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />
MTP/WESTLAKE MIDDLE SCHOOL<br />
# OF STUDENTS: 160 GRADE(S) 7<br />
DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 3/28/12<br />
NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />
STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />
ARTIST: ALLISON BLACK<br />
CONTRACT #: A8018<br />
TITLE OF PROGRAM: ZUMBA DANCING FOR JAZZ CO<br />
TYPE OF PROGRAM: WORKSHOP<br />
DISTRICT/ SCHOOL: TUCKAHOE/TUCKAHOE HIGH SCHOOL<br />
# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />
# OF STUDENTS: 60 GRADE(S) 9-12<br />
DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 11/28/11-3/3/12<br />
NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />
STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />
1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />
1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />
1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />
2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />
3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />
4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />
5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />
6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />
7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />
MIDDLE SCHOOL IS A VERY CHALLENGING AGE TO ENGAGE THE<br />
STUDENTS. THEY ALL LOVED THIS PROGRAM.<br />
8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />
NONE<br />
9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />
NONE<br />
ARTIST: ALVIN AILEY AMERICAN DANCE FOUND<br />
TITLE OF PROGRAM: STUDENT DANCERS<br />
TYPE OF PROGRAM: ASSEMBLY<br />
DISTRICT/ SCHOOL:<br />
NEW ROCHELLE/WARD ELEM. SCHOOL<br />
CONTRACT #: A7854<br />
# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />
# OF STUDENTS: 900 GRADE(S) K-4<br />
DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE<br />
11/16-18/11<br />
NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />
STANDARD 1 STANDARD 2 STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4 X<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
N/<br />
1.<br />
2.<br />
3.<br />
4.<br />
5.<br />
6.<br />
STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />
ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />
EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />
ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />
TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />
QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
N/<br />
7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />
DANCE IS EDUCATIONAL, CULTURAL, PHYSICALLY ACTIVE AND FUN.<br />
8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />
HIGHER LEVEL DANCE NEXT YEAR.<br />
9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />
NONE<br />
ARTIST: ALYSSA SATIN CAPUCILLI, INC.<br />
TITLE OF PROGRAM: AUTHOR VISIT<br />
TYPE OF PROGRAM: WORKSHOP<br />
DISTRICT/ SCHOOL:<br />
CONTRACT #: A7788<br />
KATONAH/LEWISBORO/KATONAH ELEM. SCHOOL<br />
# OF TEACHERS: 3<br />
# OF STUDENTS: 120 GRADE(S) K & 1<br />
DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 3/22/12<br />
NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />
STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 X STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />
1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />
1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />
1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />
2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />
3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />
4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />
5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />
6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />
7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />
THE DANCERS WERE CONFIDENT, STRONG AND TALENTED. THE<br />
STUDENTS WATCHING WERE IMPRESSED FROM WARMUP TO<br />
DANCE TO Q & A.<br />
8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />
NONE<br />
9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />
BEAUTIFUL, THE WHOLE SCHOOL ENJOYED THE PERFORMANCE.<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />
2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />
3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />
4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />
5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />
6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />
7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />
SHE WAS TERRIFIC. SHE HAD A WONDERFUL WAY WITH OUR<br />
CHILDREN. THEY LOVED MEETING HER.<br />
8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />
NONE<br />
9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />
NONE<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
N/<br />
Arts in Education Service - School Evaluations <strong>2011</strong>-<strong>2012</strong><br />
Page 9 of 332
ARTIST: ALYSSA SATIN CAPUCILLI, INC.<br />
CONTRACT #: A8407<br />
TITLE OF PROGRAM: AUTHOR VISIT<br />
TYPE OF PROGRAM: ASSEMBLY<br />
DISTRICT/ SCHOOL: EASTCHESTER/WAVERLY EARLY CHILDHOOD CTR<br />
# OF TEACHERS: 20 # OF STUDENTS: 500 GRADE(S) K & 1<br />
DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 3/16/12<br />
NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />
STANDARD 1 STANDARD 2 STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />
ARTIST: ALYSSA SATIN CAPUCILLI, INC.<br />
CONTRACT #: A8347<br />
TITLE OF PROGRAM: AUTHOR VISIT<br />
TYPE OF PROGRAM: ASSEMBLY<br />
DISTRICT/ SCHOOL:<br />
# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />
BRIARCLIFF/TODD ELEM.<br />
# OF STUDENTS: 200 GRADE(S) K & 1<br />
DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 1/24/12<br />
NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />
STANDARD 1 STANDARD 2 STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />
1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />
1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />
1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />
2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />
3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />
4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />
5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />
6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />
7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />
ALYSSA IS AN INSPIRATIONAL AND MOTIVATIONAL ARTIST FOR<br />
INTRODUCING WRITERS' WORKSHOP. SHE IS ALSO EXCELLENT<br />
FOR THE READING SKILLS REINFORCEMENT AND REPETITION.<br />
8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />
NOTHING. SHE WAS FABULOUS.<br />
9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />
RELATED VERY WELL TO THE CHILDREN. OUR STUDENTS WERE<br />
ENRICHED BY THE PRESENTATION AND WILL BE GROWING AS<br />
AUTHORS AND ILLUSTRATORS AS A RESULT OF THIS<br />
OUTSTANDING PRESENTATION.<br />
ARTIST: ALYSSA SATIN CAPUCILLI, INC.<br />
TITLE OF PROGRAM: AUTHOR VISIT<br />
TYPE OF PROGRAM: ASSEMBLY<br />
DISTRICT/ SCHOOL:<br />
SOMERS/PRIMROSE ELEM.<br />
CONTRACT #: A8711<br />
# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />
# OF STUDENTS: 240 GRADE(S) K<br />
DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE<br />
3/29-30/12<br />
NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />
STANDARD 1 STANDARD 2 STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
1.<br />
2.<br />
3.<br />
4.<br />
5.<br />
6.<br />
STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />
ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />
EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />
ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />
TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />
QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />
ALYSSA IS ENGAGING, INFORMATIVE AND KNOWS HER AUDIENCE.<br />
SHE IS THE CONSUMMATE AUTHOR PRO.<br />
8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />
NONE<br />
9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />
ARTIST:<br />
NONE<br />
AMADEUS MUSIC CONSERVATORY<br />
CONTRACT #: A7588<br />
TITLE OF PROGRAM: FRANK PIERANGEL - DRUM WORKSHOPS<br />
TYPE OF PROGRAM: WORKSHOP<br />
DISTRICT/ SCHOOL:<br />
KATONAH/LEWISBORO/KATONAH ELEM. SCHOOL<br />
# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />
# OF STUDENTS: 9 GRADE(S) 4 & 5<br />
DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE<br />
10/6-12/1/11<br />
NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />
STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 X STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />
1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />
1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />
1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />
2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />
3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />
4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />
5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />
6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />
2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />
3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />
4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />
5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />
6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />
4<br />
4<br />
4<br />
4<br />
4<br />
4<br />
7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM?<br />
SHE'S WONDERFUL ALWAYS.<br />
Y<br />
WHY?<br />
7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM?<br />
NONE<br />
Y<br />
WHY?<br />
8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />
NONE<br />
9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />
WE LOVE HER.<br />
8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />
NONE<br />
9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />
NONE<br />
Arts in Education Service - School Evaluations <strong>2011</strong>-<strong>2012</strong><br />
Page 10 of 332
ARTIST: AMERICAN BALLROOM THEATRE COMP CONTRACT #: A8030<br />
TITLE OF PROGRAM: IVELISSE HORNYAK DANCING CLASSROOMS - MAD<br />
HOT BALLROOM DANCING<br />
TYPE OF PROGRAM: RESIDENCY<br />
DISTRICT/ SCHOOL:<br />
# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />
PELHAM/COLONIAL ELEM.<br />
# OF STUDENTS: 23 GRADE(S) 4<br />
DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 12/16/11-3/14/12<br />
NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />
STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 X STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4 X<br />
ARTIST: AMERICAN BALLROOM THEATRE COMP<br />
CONTRACT #: A8181<br />
TITLE OF PROGRAM: IVELISSE HORNYAK DANCING CLASSROOMS -<br />
SOCIAL BALLROOM DANCING<br />
TYPE OF PROGRAM: RESIDENCY<br />
DISTRICT/ SCHOOL:<br />
# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />
PELHAM/HUTCHINSON ELEM.<br />
# OF STUDENTS: 70 GRADE(S) 5<br />
DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 12/15/11-3/15/12<br />
NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />
STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 X STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4 X<br />
1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />
1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />
1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />
2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />
3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />
4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />
5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />
6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />
7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />
SHE IS A WONDERFUL TEACHER. BESIDES DANCE, STUDENTS<br />
LEARNED RESPECT.<br />
8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />
NONE<br />
9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />
NONE<br />
4<br />
5<br />
4<br />
5<br />
5<br />
4<br />
1.<br />
2.<br />
3.<br />
4.<br />
5.<br />
6.<br />
STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />
ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />
EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />
ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />
TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />
QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />
IT MOTIVATES STUDENTS AND REINFORCES POSITIVE QUALITIES.<br />
8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />
NONE<br />
9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />
GREAT JOB.<br />
ARTIST: AMERICAN PLACE THEATRE<br />
CONTRACT #: A8069<br />
TITLE OF PROGRAM: THE THINGS THEY CARRIED<br />
TYPE OF PROGRAM: ASSEMBLY<br />
DISTRICT/ SCHOOL: LAKELAND/LAKELAND HIGH SCHOOL<br />
# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />
# OF STUDENTS: GRADE(S) 11<br />
DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 5/18/12<br />
NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />
STANDARD 1 STANDARD 2 STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4 X<br />
ARTIST: AMERICAN PROGRAM BUREAU<br />
CONTRACT #: A7852<br />
TITLE OF PROGRAM: RACHEL SIMMONS - AUTHOR VISIT<br />
TYPE OF PROGRAM: ASSEMBLY<br />
DISTRICT/ SCHOOL: KATONAH/LEWISBORO/JOHN JAY MIDDLE & HIGH SCH<br />
# OF TEACHERS: 5<br />
# OF STUDENTS: 300 GRADE(S) 6-12<br />
DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 11/9/11<br />
NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />
STANDARD 1 STANDARD 2 STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />
1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />
1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />
1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />
2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />
3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />
4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />
5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />
6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />
7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />
NONE<br />
8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />
WE RECOMMEND THAT THERE BE A MINIMAL INTRODUCTION WITH<br />
A Q & A PERIOD RESERVED FOR THE END OF THE PERFORMANCE.<br />
THIS WOULD PROVIDE FOR MEANINGFUL STUDENT/ACTOR<br />
DISCUSSION.<br />
9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />
NONE<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />
2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />
3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />
4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />
5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />
6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />
7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />
RACHEL IS A DRAMATIC, COMPELLING, ENTERTAINING<br />
STORYTELLER WHO CONNECTS EXTREMELY WELL WITH<br />
STUDENTS.<br />
8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />
IT WOULD BE GREAT IF RACHEL ALSO HAD AN ARTIST IN<br />
RESIDENCE PROGRAM FOR SMALL GROUPS OF STUDENTS.<br />
9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />
NONE<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
Arts in Education Service - School Evaluations <strong>2011</strong>-<strong>2012</strong><br />
Page 11 of 332
ARTIST: AMERICAN TAP DANCE FOUNDATION, I<br />
CONTRACT #: A7917<br />
TITLE OF PROGRAM: TAP CITY YOUTH ENSEMBLE - TAPPING INTO NEW<br />
YORK<br />
TYPE OF PROGRAM: ASSEMBLY<br />
DISTRICT/ SCHOOL: PLEASANTVILLE/BEDFORD ROAD ELEM.<br />
# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />
# OF STUDENTS: 640 GRADE(S) K-4<br />
DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 1/9/12<br />
NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />
STANDARD 1 STANDARD 2 STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4 X<br />
1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />
ARTIST: ANDREA DAVIS PINKNEY<br />
CONTRACT #: A8555<br />
TITLE OF PROGRAM: AUTHOR VISIT<br />
TYPE OF PROGRAM: ASSEMBLY<br />
DISTRICT/ SCHOOL: POCANTICO HILLS/POCANTICO HILLS MS<br />
# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />
# OF STUDENTS: 130 GRADE(S) 5-8<br />
DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 2/28/12<br />
NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />
STANDARD 1 STANDARD 2 STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4 X<br />
1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />
1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />
2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />
3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />
4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />
5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />
6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />
7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />
IT WAS FABULOUS AND THE STUDENTS LOVED IT.<br />
8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />
NONE<br />
9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />
NONE<br />
5<br />
4<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
1.<br />
2.<br />
3.<br />
4.<br />
5.<br />
6.<br />
STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />
ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />
EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />
ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />
TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />
QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
4<br />
7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />
ANDREA WAS FANTASTIC, VERY ENGAGING AND IMPRESSIVE<br />
PRESENTATION. HER BOOKS HELP STUDENTS LEARN ABOUT<br />
MANY IMPORTANT EVENTS AND PEOPLE WHO CHANGE HISTORY.<br />
8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />
NONE<br />
9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />
EVERYONE HAD VERY POSITIVE THINGS TO SAY ABOUT HER VISIT.<br />
ARTIST: ANDREA ELAM<br />
CONTRACT #: A8707<br />
TITLE OF PROGRAM: BAILEMOS - SOUTH AMERICA FOLKLORIC DANCE<br />
TYPE OF PROGRAM: WORKSHOP<br />
DISTRICT/ SCHOOL:<br />
# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />
PEEKSKILL/HILLCREST ELEM.<br />
# OF STUDENTS: 9 GRADE(S) 4 & 5<br />
DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 4/16-6/8/12<br />
NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />
STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 X STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4 X<br />
ARTIST: ANDREA ELAM<br />
CONTRACT #: A7924<br />
TITLE OF PROGRAM: SINGING - GLEE KIDS<br />
TYPE OF PROGRAM: WORKSHOP<br />
DISTRICT/ SCHOOL: CHAPPAQUA/WESTORCHARD ELEM.<br />
# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />
# OF STUDENTS: 11 GRADE(S) 1-3<br />
DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 1/11-2/29/12<br />
NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />
STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />
1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />
1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />
1.<br />
2.<br />
3.<br />
4.<br />
5.<br />
6.<br />
STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />
ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />
EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />
ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />
TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />
QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
N/<br />
7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />
TEACHING THIS DANCE TO STUDENTS REGARDLESS TO THEIR<br />
ETHNICITY IS BENEFICIAL. IT OPENS THEM TO OTHER CULTURES,<br />
CREATES ARTISTIC APPRECIATION AND INCREASES KNOWLEDGE<br />
AND SENSITIVITY.<br />
8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />
NONE<br />
9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />
SHE IS A WONDERFUL TEACHING ARTIST WHO CLEARLY ENJOYS<br />
HER ART AND SHARING IT WITH STUDENTS.<br />
1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />
2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />
3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />
4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />
5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />
6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />
7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />
NONE<br />
8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />
NONE<br />
9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />
NONE<br />
4<br />
4<br />
4<br />
4<br />
4<br />
N/<br />
Arts in Education Service - School Evaluations <strong>2011</strong>-<strong>2012</strong><br />
Page 12 of 332
ARTIST: ANDREA HOMER-MacDONALD<br />
CONTRACT #: A7591<br />
TITLE OF PROGRAM: DANCE RESIDENCY<br />
TYPE OF PROGRAM: RESIDENCY<br />
DISTRICT/ SCHOOL:<br />
# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />
PELHAM/COLONIAL ELEM.<br />
# OF STUDENTS: 60 GRADE(S) 2<br />
DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 9/20-10/28/11<br />
NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />
STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 X STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4 X<br />
ARTIST: ANDREW GMOSER dba SILENT G PROD CONTRACT #: A8027<br />
TITLE OF PROGRAM: LIGHTING DESIGNER FOR JAZZ CO.<br />
TYPE OF PROGRAM: RESIDENCY<br />
DISTRICT/ SCHOOL: TUCKAHOE/TUCKAHOE HIGH SCHOOL<br />
# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />
# OF STUDENTS: 60 GRADE(S) 9-12<br />
DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 2/28-3/3/12<br />
NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />
STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 X STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />
1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />
1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />
1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />
2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />
3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />
4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />
5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />
6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />
7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />
ANDREA IS ENTHUSIASTIC AND GENUINE IN HER TEACHING AND<br />
PASSIONATE ABOUT DANCE. SHE MIRRORS OUR CURRICULUM OF<br />
MOVEMENT EDUCATION SO NICELY AND ALSO INCORPORATES<br />
MATERIALS THE STUDENTS LEARN IN THE CLASSROOM.<br />
8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />
HAVE A COPY OF THE MUSIC JUST IN CASE WE HAVE A<br />
MALFUNCTION ON MY IPAD OR COMPUTER OR CD.<br />
9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />
ANDREA HAS EXCELLENT CLASSROOM MANAGEMENT SKILLS AND<br />
DOES AN EXCELLENT JOB COMMUNICATING THE RESPECT<br />
NEEDED IN THE DANCE FIELD. I OFTEN CONTINUE USING HER<br />
STRATEGIES LONG AFTER SHE COMPLETES HER RESIDENCY AND<br />
ALSO USE THEM WITH OTHER CLASSES.<br />
ARTIST: ANDREW GMOSER dba SILENT G PROD CONTRACT #: A8179<br />
TITLE OF PROGRAM: LIGHTING DESIGNER FOR THE SHOW - ANNIE GET<br />
YOUR GUN<br />
TYPE OF PROGRAM: RESIDENCY<br />
DISTRICT/ SCHOOL:<br />
TUCKAHOE/TUCKAHOE MS & HS<br />
# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />
# OF STUDENTS: GRADE(S) 6-12<br />
DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE<br />
3/16-21/12<br />
NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />
STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 X STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />
1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
4<br />
1.<br />
2.<br />
3.<br />
4.<br />
5.<br />
6.<br />
STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />
ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />
EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />
ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />
TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />
QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />
DANCE IS EDUCATIONAL, CULTURAL, ACTIVE AND THE STUDENTS<br />
GENUINELY ENJOYED IT AND WERE COMMITTED TO THE PROGRAM.<br />
8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />
NONE<br />
9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />
ARTIST:<br />
NONE<br />
ANDREW KEATING<br />
TITLE OF PROGRAM: VISUAL ARTIST VISIT<br />
TYPE OF PROGRAM: ASSEMBLY<br />
DISTRICT/ SCHOOL:<br />
NEW ROCHELLE/NEW ROCHELLE HS<br />
CONTRACT #: A8317<br />
# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />
# OF STUDENTS: 50 GRADE(S) 11 & 12<br />
DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE<br />
2/28/12<br />
NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />
STANDARD 1 STANDARD 2 STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />
1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />
1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />
2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />
3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />
4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />
5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />
6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />
7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />
EXCELLENT PRODUCTION.<br />
8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />
NONE<br />
9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />
NONE<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />
2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />
3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />
4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />
5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />
6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />
7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />
VISITING ARTISTS ARE A GREAT INFLUENCE TO ALL OUR<br />
STUDENTS.<br />
8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />
NONE<br />
9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />
NONE<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
4<br />
5<br />
Arts in Education Service - School Evaluations <strong>2011</strong>-<strong>2012</strong><br />
Page 13 of 332
ARTIST: ANGELA PERSAUD-ALLY<br />
CONTRACT #: A8183<br />
TITLE OF PROGRAM: BOOKS COME ALIVE WITH ART<br />
TYPE OF PROGRAM: WORKSHOP<br />
DISTRICT/ SCHOOL:<br />
# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />
PELHAM/HUTCHINSON ELEM.<br />
# OF STUDENTS: GRADE(S) 3<br />
DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 1/10-4/5/12<br />
NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />
STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 X STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />
ARTIST: ANGELA REID<br />
CONTRACT #: A7518<br />
TITLE OF PROGRAM: DANCE RESIDENCY<br />
TYPE OF PROGRAM: RESIDENCY<br />
DISTRICT/ SCHOOL: GREENBURGH #7/WOODLANDS MS/HS<br />
# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />
# OF STUDENTS: 10 GRADE(S) 7-12<br />
DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE OCT., <strong>2011</strong>-MAY, <strong>2012</strong><br />
NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />
STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 X STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4 X<br />
1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />
1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />
1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />
2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />
3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />
4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />
5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />
6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />
5<br />
4<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />
2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />
3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />
4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />
5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />
6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM?<br />
EXCELLENT<br />
Y<br />
WHY?<br />
7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM?<br />
EXCELLENT TEACHER.<br />
Y<br />
WHY?<br />
8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />
NONE<br />
9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />
NONE<br />
8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />
NONE<br />
9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />
NONE<br />
ARTIST: ANNA RIEHL<br />
CONTRACT #: A7966<br />
TITLE OF PROGRAM: ART & CULTURE OF YOGA<br />
TYPE OF PROGRAM: WORKSHOP<br />
DISTRICT/ SCHOOL:<br />
# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />
PELHAM/COLONIAL ELEM.<br />
# OF STUDENTS: 12 GRADE(S) K-2<br />
DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 12/1/11-2/16/12<br />
NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />
STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 X STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4 X<br />
ARTIST: ANNE FRETZ-IVERSEN<br />
CONTRACT #: A7926B<br />
TITLE OF PROGRAM: ARTS & CRAFTS<br />
TYPE OF PROGRAM: WORKSHOP<br />
DISTRICT/ SCHOOL: CHAPPAQUA/WESTORCHARD ELEM.<br />
# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />
# OF STUDENTS: 8 GRADE(S) K & 1<br />
DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 1/13-3/9/12<br />
NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />
STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 X STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />
1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />
1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />
1.<br />
2.<br />
3.<br />
4.<br />
5.<br />
6.<br />
STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />
ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />
EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />
ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />
TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />
QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
N/<br />
N/<br />
7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />
ANNA WAS VERY DEDICATED AND KEPT THE CHILDREN<br />
ENTHUSIASTIC AND MOTIVATED. SHE TAUGHT THE CHILDREN HOW<br />
TO MOVE THEIR BODY USING BASIC YOGA POSES THROUGH<br />
EXERCISE AND SONG. THE CHILDREN WERE WELL BEHAVED.<br />
8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />
NONE<br />
9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />
NONE<br />
1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />
2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />
3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />
4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />
5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />
6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />
7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />
WONDERFUL. THE STUDENTS LOVED HER AND LEARNED A LOT.<br />
8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />
NONE<br />
9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />
NONE<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
Arts in Education Service - School Evaluations <strong>2011</strong>-<strong>2012</strong><br />
Page 14 of 332
ARTIST: ANNE FRETZ-IVERSEN<br />
CONTRACT #: A8203<br />
TITLE OF PROGRAM: FRENCH CULTURE & LANGUAGE<br />
TYPE OF PROGRAM: WORKSHOP<br />
DISTRICT/ SCHOOL: CHAPPAQUA/ROARING BROOK ELEM.<br />
# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />
# OF STUDENTS: GRADE(S) K-2<br />
DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 1/11-2/29/12<br />
NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />
STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 X STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4 X<br />
ARTIST: ANNE FRETZ-IVERSEN<br />
CONTRACT #: A7926A<br />
TITLE OF PROGRAM: FRENCH CULTURE & LANGUAGE<br />
TYPE OF PROGRAM: WORKSHOP<br />
DISTRICT/ SCHOOL: CHAPPAQUA/WESTORCHARD ELEM.<br />
# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />
# OF STUDENTS: 8 GRADE(S) K-4<br />
DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 1/12-3/8/12<br />
NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />
STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 X STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4 X<br />
1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />
1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />
1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />
2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />
3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />
4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />
5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />
6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />
7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />
ANNE IS AN ENGAGING INSTRUCTOR.<br />
8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />
NONE<br />
9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />
NONE<br />
4<br />
4<br />
4<br />
4<br />
3<br />
4<br />
1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />
2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />
3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />
4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />
5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />
6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />
7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />
WONDERFUL. THE STUDENTS LOVED HER AND LEARNED A LOT.<br />
8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />
NONE<br />
9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />
NONE<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
ARTIST: ANNE MARIE GALLER<br />
CONTRACT #: A8307<br />
TITLE OF PROGRAM: CHOREOGRAPHER FOR THE SHOW - GUYS & DOLLS<br />
TYPE OF PROGRAM: RESIDENCY<br />
DISTRICT/ SCHOOL: KATONAH/LEWISBORO/JOHN JAY HIGH SCHOOL<br />
# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />
# OF STUDENTS: 50 GRADE(S) 9-12<br />
DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 2/1-3/22/12<br />
NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />
STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 X STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4 X<br />
ARTIST: ANTHONY TRAINA<br />
CONTRACT #: A8041B<br />
TITLE OF PROGRAM: DRUMMER FOR CHORUS SPRING CONCERT<br />
TYPE OF PROGRAM: ASSEMBLY<br />
DISTRICT/ SCHOOL: KATONAH/LEWISBORO/JOHN JAY MIDDLE SCHOOL<br />
# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />
# OF STUDENTS: 350 GRADE(S) 6-8<br />
DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 6/5/12<br />
NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />
STANDARD 1 STANDARD 2 STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />
1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />
1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />
1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />
2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />
3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />
4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />
5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />
6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />
2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />
3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />
4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />
5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />
6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM?<br />
NONE<br />
Y<br />
WHY?<br />
7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM?<br />
NONE<br />
Y<br />
WHY?<br />
8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />
NONE<br />
9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />
NONE<br />
8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />
NONE<br />
9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />
NONE<br />
Arts in Education Service - School Evaluations <strong>2011</strong>-<strong>2012</strong><br />
Page 15 of 332
ARTIST: ANTHONY TRAINA<br />
CONTRACT #: A8041A<br />
TITLE OF PROGRAM: DRUMMER FOR CHORUS WINTER CONCERT<br />
TYPE OF PROGRAM: ASSEMBLY<br />
DISTRICT/ SCHOOL: KATONAH/LEWISBORO/JOHN JAY MIDDLE SCHOOL<br />
# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />
# OF STUDENTS: 350 GRADE(S) 6-8<br />
DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 12/1/11-1/25/12<br />
NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />
STANDARD 1 STANDARD 2 STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />
1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />
ARTIST: APPLEBY FOUNDATION INC., dba REBE CONTRACT #: A7561<br />
TITLE OF PROGRAM: MICHELLE WURT - KIDS CO MOTION DANCE &<br />
MOVEMENT<br />
TYPE OF PROGRAM: WORKSHOP<br />
DISTRICT/ SCHOOL: KATONAH/LEWISBORO/KATONAH ELEM. SCHOOL<br />
# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />
# OF STUDENTS: 7 GRADE(S) 3-5<br />
DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 10/6-12/1/11<br />
NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />
STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 X STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />
1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />
1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />
2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />
3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />
4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />
5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />
6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />
7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />
NONE<br />
8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />
NONE<br />
9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />
NONE<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
1.<br />
2.<br />
3.<br />
4.<br />
5.<br />
6.<br />
STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />
ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />
EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />
ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />
TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />
QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />
4<br />
4<br />
4<br />
4<br />
4<br />
4<br />
7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />
ORGANIZED AND WELL RUN. THE STUDENTS ENJOYED THE CLASS.<br />
8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />
NONE<br />
9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />
NONE<br />
ARTIST: APPLEBY FOUNDATION INC., dba REBE CONTRACT #: A8280<br />
TITLE OF PROGRAM: MICHELLE WURT - LET'S GET MOVING<br />
TYPE OF PROGRAM: WORKSHOP<br />
DISTRICT/ SCHOOL: KATONAH/LEWISBORO/KATONAH ELEM. SCHOOL<br />
# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />
# OF STUDENTS: 9 GRADE(S) K-2<br />
DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 1/17-3/13/12<br />
NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />
STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 X STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />
1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />
ARTIST: ARCOIRIS RECORDS, INC.<br />
CONTRACT #: A8482<br />
TITLE OF PROGRAM: JOSE LUIS OROZCO - LANGUAGE, HISTORY &<br />
CULTURE THRU MUSIC<br />
TYPE OF PROGRAM: ASSEMBLY<br />
DISTRICT/ SCHOOL: TARRYTOWN/JOHN PAULDING ELEM.<br />
# OF TEACHERS: 10 # OF STUDENTS: 600 GRADE(S) K-2<br />
DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 4/17/12<br />
NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />
STANDARD 1 STANDARD 2 STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4 X<br />
1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />
1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />
2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />
3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />
4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />
5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />
6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />
7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />
WELL LIKE, ORGANIZED AND A GOOD CLASS.<br />
8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />
NONE<br />
9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />
NONE<br />
4<br />
4<br />
4<br />
4<br />
4<br />
4<br />
1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />
2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />
3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />
4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />
5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />
6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />
7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />
NONE<br />
8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />
NONE<br />
9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />
JOSE IS A CONSUMATE PROFESSIONAL WHO STRIVES<br />
CONTINUOUSLY TO IMPROVE. WE TRULY ENJOY THIS GIFTED<br />
MUSICIAN PERFORMER WHO CAPTIVATED OVER 600 YOUNG<br />
CHILDREN WITH HIS PRESENCE.<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
Arts in Education Service - School Evaluations <strong>2011</strong>-<strong>2012</strong><br />
Page 16 of 332
ARTIST: ARM OF THE SEA PRODUCTIONS, INC. CONTRACT #: A8165<br />
TITLE OF PROGRAM: AT THE TURNING OF THE TIDE SHOW<br />
TYPE OF PROGRAM: ASSEMBLY<br />
DISTRICT/ SCHOOL: EASTCHESTER/ANNE HUTCHINSON ELEM.<br />
# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />
# OF STUDENTS: 22 GRADE(S) 4 & 5<br />
DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 1/4/12<br />
NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />
STANDARD 1 STANDARD 2 STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />
ARTIST: ARM OF THE SEA PRODUCTIONS, INC. CONTRACT #: A8165<br />
TITLE OF PROGRAM: AT THE TURNING OF THE TIDE SHOW<br />
TYPE OF PROGRAM: ASSEMBLY<br />
DISTRICT/ SCHOOL: EASTCHESTER/ANNE HUTCHINSON ELEM.<br />
# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />
# OF STUDENTS: GRADE(S) 4 & 5<br />
DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 1/4/12<br />
NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />
STANDARD 1 STANDARD 2 STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />
1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />
1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />
1.<br />
2.<br />
3.<br />
4.<br />
5.<br />
6.<br />
STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />
ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />
EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />
ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />
TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />
QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />
3<br />
4<br />
3<br />
4<br />
3<br />
N/<br />
7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? N WHY?<br />
I THOUGHT THAT THERE WERE MANY PARTS OF THIS PROGRAM<br />
THAT WERE INAPPROPRIATE FOR 4TH AND 5TH GRADERS. IT ALSO<br />
DOESN'T FOCUS ON THE INFORMATION WE TEACH ABOUT THE<br />
HUDSON RIVER.<br />
8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />
NONE<br />
9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />
NONE<br />
ARTIST: ARM OF THE SEA PRODUCTIONS, INC. CONTRACT #: A8165<br />
TITLE OF PROGRAM: AT THE TURNING OF THE TIDE SHOW<br />
TYPE OF PROGRAM: ASSEMBLY<br />
DISTRICT/ SCHOOL:<br />
EASTCHESTER/ANNE HUTCHINSON ELEM.<br />
# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />
# OF STUDENTS: 24 GRADE(S) 4 & 5<br />
DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE<br />
1/4/12<br />
NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />
STANDARD 1 STANDARD 2 STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />
1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />
2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />
3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />
4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />
5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />
6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />
7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />
BEAUTIFUL PROGRAM BUT MANY 4TH GRADERS DIDN'T<br />
UNDERSTAND IT.<br />
8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />
DO NOT SET STUDENTS TO THE LEFT OF STAGE. VIEW IS BLOCKED<br />
BY NARRATION.<br />
9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />
NONE<br />
ARTIST: ARM OF THE SEA PRODUCTIONS, INC. CONTRACT #: A8165<br />
TITLE OF PROGRAM: AT THE TURNING OF THE TIDE SHOW<br />
TYPE OF PROGRAM: ASSEMBLY<br />
DISTRICT/ SCHOOL:<br />
EASTCHESTER/ANNE HUTCHINSON ELEM.<br />
# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />
# OF STUDENTS: 24 GRADE(S) 4 & 5<br />
DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE<br />
1/4/12<br />
NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />
STANDARD 1 STANDARD 2 STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />
3<br />
5<br />
4<br />
5<br />
5<br />
N/<br />
1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />
1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />
1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />
2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />
3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />
4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />
5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />
6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />
7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? N WHY?<br />
THIS PROGRAM, THOUGH WELL INTENTIONED, DID NOT REACH<br />
STUDENTS EFFECTIVELY. STUDENTS WERE OFTEN CONFUSED BY<br />
WHAT THEY SAW AND DID NOT GAIN THE CONCEPTS INTENDED.<br />
8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />
THE TIMING OF THE PERFORMANCE SHOULD BE SHORTER. THE<br />
PERFORMANCE COULD BE MORE STREAMLINED SO CONTENT WAS<br />
EASILY UNDERSTOOD.<br />
9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />
THE ARTISTRY OF SCENERY AND COSTUMES WAS BEAUTIFUL.<br />
1<br />
2<br />
2<br />
3<br />
2<br />
N/<br />
1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />
2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />
3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />
4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />
5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />
6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />
7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />
ARTISTICALLY IT WAS GREAT. STUDENTS TOLD ME THEY DIDN'T<br />
UNDERSTAND STORY AS A PERFORMANCE, HOWEVER, THEY<br />
LOVED IT.<br />
8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />
THE CONTENT UNDERSTANDING REQUIRED LOTS OF<br />
BACKGROUND KNOWLEDGE. THIS CAN BE HELPED BY PROVIDING<br />
INFO ON HUDSON ESTUARY AHEAD OF TIME.<br />
9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />
NONE<br />
4<br />
5<br />
4<br />
5<br />
5<br />
N/<br />
Arts in Education Service - School Evaluations <strong>2011</strong>-<strong>2012</strong><br />
Page 17 of 332
ARTIST: ARM OF THE SEA PRODUCTIONS, INC. CONTRACT #: A8165<br />
TITLE OF PROGRAM: AT THE TURNING OF THE TIDE SHOW<br />
TYPE OF PROGRAM: ASSEMBLY<br />
DISTRICT/ SCHOOL: EASTCHESTER/ANNE HUTCHINSON ELEM.<br />
# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />
# OF STUDENTS: GRADE(S) 4 & 5<br />
DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 1/4/12<br />
NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />
STANDARD 1 STANDARD 2 STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />
ARTIST: ARM OF THE SEA PRODUCTIONS, INC. CONTRACT #: A8613<br />
TITLE OF PROGRAM: TURTLE ISLAND MEDICINE SHOW<br />
TYPE OF PROGRAM: ASSEMBLY<br />
DISTRICT/ SCHOOL:<br />
# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />
PELHAM/SIWANOY ELEM.<br />
# OF STUDENTS: 100 GRADE(S) 4 & 5<br />
DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 4/30/12<br />
NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />
STANDARD 1 STANDARD 2 STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4 X<br />
1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />
1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />
1.<br />
2.<br />
3.<br />
4.<br />
5.<br />
6.<br />
STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />
ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />
EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />
ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />
TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />
QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />
3<br />
2<br />
N/<br />
5<br />
5<br />
N/<br />
7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? N WHY?<br />
I FELT SOME OF THE MATERIAL A LITTLE INAPPROPRIATE AND IT<br />
WAS VERY CONFUSING TO MANY OF THE STUDENTS.<br />
8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />
NONE<br />
9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />
NONE<br />
1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />
2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />
3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />
4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />
5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />
6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />
7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />
THE VISUAL REPRESENTATION OF GLOBAL WARMING WAS<br />
OUTSTANDING. THE STORY AND MUSIC WERE ENGAGING. THE<br />
AUDIENCE WAS AWE-STRUCK.<br />
8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />
NONE<br />
9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />
THANK YOU. WE CAN'T WAIT TO HAVE YOU BACK AGAIN.<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
ARTIST: ARM OF THE SEA PRODUCTIONS, INC. CONTRACT #: A7563<br />
TITLE OF PROGRAM: TURTLE ISLAND MEDICINE SHOW<br />
TYPE OF PROGRAM: ASSEMBLY<br />
DISTRICT/ SCHOOL: EASTCHESTER/GREENVALE ELEM.<br />
# OF TEACHERS: 4<br />
# OF STUDENTS: 525 GRADE(S) 2-5<br />
DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 10/21/11<br />
NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />
STANDARD 1 STANDARD 2 STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4 X<br />
ARTIST: ARTS ARE ESSENTIAL, INC.<br />
CONTRACT #: A8788<br />
TITLE OF PROGRAM: TONY VACCA - WORLD PERCUSSION RHYTHMS<br />
TYPE OF PROGRAM: ASSEMBLY/WORKSHOP<br />
DISTRICT/ SCHOOL: NEW ROCHELLE/ALBERT LEONARD MIDDLE SCHOOL<br />
# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />
# OF STUDENTS: GRADE(S) 6-8<br />
DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 4/30-5/1/12<br />
NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />
STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 X STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4 X<br />
1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />
1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />
1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />
2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />
3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />
4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />
5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />
6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />
5<br />
4<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
4<br />
1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />
2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />
3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />
4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />
5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />
6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />
SCENERY AND PROPS WERE VERY COLORFUL, FUN AND<br />
ELABORATE. THE STORY WAS VERY EDUCATIONAL.<br />
8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />
ARTIST WAS LATE DUE TO TRAFFIC. BE ON TIME.<br />
9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />
2ND AND 3RD GRADES SEEMED NOT TO GRASP ALL OF THE<br />
CONCEPTS.<br />
7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM?<br />
THE PRESENTERS WERE EXCELLENT.<br />
8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />
NONE<br />
9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />
NONE<br />
Y<br />
WHY?<br />
Arts in Education Service - School Evaluations <strong>2011</strong>-<strong>2012</strong><br />
Page 18 of 332
ARTIST: ARTS HORIZONS, INC.<br />
CONTRACT #: A8168<br />
TITLE OF PROGRAM: AFRICAN HORIZONS<br />
TYPE OF PROGRAM: ASSEMBLY<br />
DISTRICT/ SCHOOL: HENDRICK HUDSON/BUCHANAN/VERPLANCK ELEM.<br />
# OF TEACHERS: 5<br />
# OF STUDENTS: 307 GRADE(S) K-5<br />
DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 5/14/12<br />
NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />
STANDARD 1 STANDARD 2 STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4 X<br />
ARTIST: ARTS HORIZONS, INC.<br />
CONTRACT #: A8377B<br />
TITLE OF PROGRAM: ELLIS ISLAND STORIES<br />
TYPE OF PROGRAM: ASSEMBLY<br />
DISTRICT/ SCHOOL: TARRYTOWN/WASHINGTON IRVING ELEM.<br />
# OF TEACHERS: 8<br />
# OF STUDENTS: 185 GRADE(S) 4<br />
DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 4/30/12<br />
NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />
STANDARD 1 STANDARD 2 STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4 X<br />
1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />
1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />
1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />
2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />
3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />
4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />
5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />
6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />
7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />
VERY ENERGETIC AND ENGAGING PROGRAM. AUDIENCE<br />
PARTICIPATION HELPED STUDENTS CONNECT TO THE MATERIALS.<br />
"DRUMTALK" WAS A GREAT WAY TO CONNECT INSTRUMENT<br />
NAMES.<br />
8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />
USE OF THE WORD 'SEXY' BOTHERED SOME TEACHERS. THE<br />
CREAMING PORTION USED TO HELP STUDENTS GET THEIR ENERGY<br />
OUT? WAS UPSETTING TO SOME.<br />
9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />
LONG LAG TIME BETWEEN INTRODUCTION BY SCHOOL AND<br />
PROGRAM START.<br />
ARTIST: ARTS HORIZONS, INC.<br />
TITLE OF PROGRAM: ELLIS ISLAND STORIES<br />
TYPE OF PROGRAM: ASSEMBLY<br />
DISTRICT/ SCHOOL:<br />
BYRAM HILLS/WAMPUS ELEM.<br />
CONTRACT #: A7876<br />
# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />
# OF STUDENTS: 220 GRADE(S) 4<br />
DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE<br />
6/5/12<br />
NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />
STANDARD 1 STANDARD 2 STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4 X<br />
4<br />
5<br />
4<br />
4<br />
5<br />
5<br />
1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />
2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />
3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />
4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />
5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />
6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />
7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />
THE ARTISTS WERE EXTREMELY PROFESIONAL AND DID A GREAT<br />
JOB CONNECTING THE STORIES TO THEIR PERSONAL<br />
EXPERIENCES.<br />
8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />
ALLOW TIME FOR A FEW MORE QUESTIONS AND STUDENTS<br />
PARTICIPATION.<br />
9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />
ARTIST:<br />
GREAT JOB. THE STUDENTS ENJOYED THE PERFORMANCE AND IT<br />
TIED INTO OUR CURRICULUM NICELY.<br />
ARTS HORIZONS, INC.<br />
TITLE OF PROGRAM: JOURNEYS WITH SOUND<br />
TYPE OF PROGRAM: ASSEMBLY<br />
DISTRICT/ SCHOOL:<br />
YORKTOWN/MOHANSIC ELEM.<br />
CONTRACT #: A8522<br />
# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />
# OF STUDENTS: GRADE(S) 3<br />
DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE<br />
5/18/12<br />
NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />
STANDARD 1 STANDARD 2 STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4 X<br />
4<br />
4<br />
3<br />
3<br />
4<br />
3<br />
1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />
1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />
1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />
2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />
3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />
4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />
5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />
6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />
2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />
3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />
4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />
5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />
6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM?<br />
NONE<br />
Y<br />
WHY?<br />
7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM?<br />
NONE<br />
Y<br />
WHY?<br />
8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />
NONE<br />
9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />
NONE<br />
8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />
NONE<br />
9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />
NONE<br />
Arts in Education Service - School Evaluations <strong>2011</strong>-<strong>2012</strong><br />
Page 19 of 332
ARTIST: ARTS HORIZONS, INC.<br />
CONTRACT #: A8273<br />
TITLE OF PROGRAM: MEET THE INSTRUMENTS<br />
TYPE OF PROGRAM: ASSEMBLY<br />
DISTRICT/ SCHOOL:<br />
# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />
CARMEL/KENT PRIMARY SCHOOL<br />
# OF STUDENTS: 472 GRADE(S) K-4<br />
DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 6/1/12<br />
NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />
STANDARD 1 STANDARD 2 STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4 X<br />
ARTIST: ARTS HORIZONS, INC.<br />
CONTRACT #: A8504<br />
TITLE OF PROGRAM: PATHWAYS TO DISCOVERY - TRACING OUR ROOTS<br />
TYPE OF PROGRAM: ASSEMBLY<br />
DISTRICT/ SCHOOL:<br />
# OF TEACHERS: 8<br />
OSSINING/CLAREMONT ELEM.<br />
# OF STUDENTS: 714 GRADE(S) 3 & 4<br />
DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 2/28/12<br />
NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />
STANDARD 1 STANDARD 2 STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4 X<br />
1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />
1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />
1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />
2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />
3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />
4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />
5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />
6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />
7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />
THEY ARE HIGHLY SKILLED MUSICIANS WHO CLEARLY ENJOY<br />
SHARING THEIR ART WITH CHILDREN.<br />
8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />
NONE<br />
9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />
NONE<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />
2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />
3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />
4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />
5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />
6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />
7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />
THE THEME WAS EXACTLY WHAT WE WERE LOOKING FOR. OUR<br />
CELEBRATION OF BLACK HISTORY MONTH.<br />
8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />
PERHAPS A FEW VISUALS DEPICTING THE DIFFERENT ERAS.<br />
9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />
EXCELLENT PROGRAM.<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
N/<br />
ARTIST: ARTS HORIZONS, INC.<br />
CONTRACT #: A8421<br />
TITLE OF PROGRAM: RAMZI EDLIBI 100 YEARS OF POPULAR DANCE<br />
TYPE OF PROGRAM: ASSEMBLY<br />
DISTRICT/ SCHOOL: TARRYTOWN/WASHINGTON IRVING ELEM.<br />
# OF TEACHERS: 9<br />
# OF STUDENTS: 388 GRADE(S) 4 & 5<br />
DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 5/7/12<br />
NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />
STANDARD 1 STANDARD 2 STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4 X<br />
ARTIST: ARTS HORIZONS, INC.<br />
CONTRACT #: A8377A<br />
TITLE OF PROGRAM: SUSAN GOODMAN JACKSON - STAND UP SPEAK OUT<br />
TYPE OF PROGRAM: ASSEMBLY<br />
DISTRICT/ SCHOOL: TARRYTOWN/WASHINGTON IRVING ELEM.<br />
# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />
# OF STUDENTS: 584 GRADE(S) 3-5<br />
DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 2/6/12<br />
NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />
STANDARD 1 STANDARD 2 STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4 X<br />
1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />
1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />
1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />
2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />
3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />
4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />
5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />
6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />
7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />
VERY ENGAGING AND FUN WITH STRONG EDUCATIONAL<br />
BACKGROUND INFORMATION.<br />
8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />
NONE<br />
9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />
THANK YOU. OUR STUDENTS AND STAFF ENJOYED THE PROGRAM.<br />
5<br />
4<br />
4<br />
5<br />
4<br />
3<br />
1.<br />
2.<br />
3.<br />
4.<br />
5.<br />
6.<br />
STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />
ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />
EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />
ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />
TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />
QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />
2<br />
2<br />
2<br />
2<br />
2<br />
2<br />
7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? N WHY?<br />
THE CONTENT OF HER LYRICS AND DISCUSSION WERE FROM TOO<br />
NEGATIVE A FRAME. IN ADDITION, SHE NEEDS TO DIFFERENTIATE<br />
BASED ON AUDIENCE.<br />
8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />
MORE UPTEMPO MUSICAL ARRANGEMENTS.<br />
9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />
SHE WAS CURTEOUS, PROFESSIONAL AND TALENTED.<br />
Arts in Education Service - School Evaluations <strong>2011</strong>-<strong>2012</strong><br />
Page 20 of 332
ARTIST: ARTS POWER, INC.<br />
CONTRACT #: A7986<br />
TITLE OF PROGRAM: FISH FACE - THE MUSICAL<br />
TYPE OF PROGRAM: ASSEMBLY<br />
DISTRICT/ SCHOOL:<br />
# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />
BRIARCLIFF/TODD ELEM.<br />
# OF STUDENTS: GRADE(S) 2<br />
DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 2/29/12<br />
NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />
STANDARD 1 STANDARD 2 STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />
ARTIST: ARTS POWER, INC.<br />
CONTRACT #: A8086<br />
TITLE OF PROGRAM: FOUR SCORE AND SEVEN YEARS AGO<br />
TYPE OF PROGRAM: ASSEMBLY<br />
DISTRICT/ SCHOOL: NEW ROCHELLE/WARD ELEM. SCHOOL<br />
# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />
# OF STUDENTS: 425 GRADE(S) 4 & 5<br />
DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 2/3/12<br />
NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />
STANDARD 1 STANDARD 2 STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />
1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />
1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />
1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />
2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />
3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />
4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />
5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />
6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
N/<br />
5<br />
N/<br />
1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />
2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />
3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />
4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />
5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />
6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM?<br />
NONE<br />
Y<br />
WHY?<br />
7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM?<br />
NONE<br />
Y<br />
WHY?<br />
8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />
Q & A SESSION.<br />
9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />
NONE<br />
8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />
NONE<br />
9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />
NONE<br />
ARTIST: ARTS POWER, INC.<br />
CONTRACT #: A8844<br />
TITLE OF PROGRAM: FROM THE MIXED UP FILES OF MRS. BASIL E.<br />
FRANKWEILER<br />
TYPE OF PROGRAM: ASSEMBLY<br />
DISTRICT/ SCHOOL: PLEASANTVILLE/PLEASANTVILLE MIDDLE SCHOOL<br />
# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />
# OF STUDENTS: GRADE(S) 5<br />
DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 5/3/12<br />
NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />
STANDARD 1 STANDARD 2 STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />
1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />
ARTIST: ARTS POWER, INC.<br />
CONTRACT #: A7562<br />
TITLE OF PROGRAM: LAURA INGALLS WILDER SHOW<br />
TYPE OF PROGRAM: ASSEMBLY<br />
DISTRICT/ SCHOOL: EASTCHESTER/GREENVALE ELEM.<br />
# OF TEACHERS: 5<br />
# OF STUDENTS: 238 GRADE(S) 4<br />
DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 11/9/11<br />
NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />
STANDARD 1 STANDARD 2 STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4 X<br />
1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />
1.<br />
2.<br />
3.<br />
4.<br />
5.<br />
6.<br />
STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />
ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />
EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />
ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />
TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />
QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />
WE LOVE ARTS POWER INC. THEY DO A WONDERFUL JOB ALWAYS.<br />
8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />
NONE<br />
9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />
THEY WERE EXCELLENT.<br />
1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />
2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />
3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />
4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />
5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />
6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />
7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />
EXCELLENT INTERPRETATION OF WEST IN THE 1800'S.<br />
8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />
NONE<br />
9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />
NONE<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
4<br />
Arts in Education Service - School Evaluations <strong>2011</strong>-<strong>2012</strong><br />
Page 21 of 332
ARTIST: ARTS POWER, INC.<br />
CONTRACT #: A7800<br />
TITLE OF PROGRAM: RAINBOW FISH SHOW<br />
TYPE OF PROGRAM: ASSEMBLY<br />
DISTRICT/ SCHOOL: EASTCHESTER/WAVERLY EARLY CHILDHOOD CTR<br />
# OF TEACHERS: 14 # OF STUDENTS: 240 GRADE(S) K<br />
DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 5/24/12<br />
NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />
STANDARD 1 STANDARD 2 STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />
ARTIST: ARTS WESTCHESTER<br />
CONTRACT #: A8827<br />
TITLE OF PROGRAM: PEDRO OSPINA - MURAL MAKING<br />
TYPE OF PROGRAM: RESIDENCY<br />
DISTRICT/ SCHOOL:<br />
# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />
OSSINING/ROOSEVELT<br />
# OF STUDENTS: 150 GRADE(S) 5<br />
DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 5/21-23/12<br />
NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />
STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 X STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4 X<br />
1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />
1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />
1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />
2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />
3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />
4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />
5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />
6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />
7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />
THE PLAY HAD VERY ATTRATIVE SCENERY, AND ENGAGING<br />
MUSICAL NUMBERS WHICH INCORPORATED DIFFERENT TYPES OF<br />
MUSIC FROM GOSPEL TO ROCKABILLY.<br />
8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />
THE PERFORMERS SPOKE VERY QUICKLY MAKING IT DIFFICULT TO<br />
UNDERSTAND THEM. MANY PEOPLE HAD DIFFICULTY HEARING<br />
DUE TO A FAULTY SPEAKER SYSTEM.<br />
9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />
THEY WERE VERY PROFESSIONAL AND PUNCTUAL. THEY USE<br />
VERY LITTLE BUT MANAGE TO PROVIDE A SUBSTANTIALLY VISUAL<br />
SHOW. COULD USE MORE AUDIENCE PARTICIPATION.<br />
4<br />
4<br />
2<br />
4<br />
2<br />
5<br />
1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />
2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />
3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />
4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />
5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />
6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />
7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />
THE METHODS AND PRODUCTS WERE EXCELLENT.<br />
8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />
NONE<br />
9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />
NONE<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
ARTIST: ASHLEY KAUFMAN<br />
CONTRACT #: A7859<br />
TITLE OF PROGRAM: JAZZ DANCING<br />
TYPE OF PROGRAM: WORKSHOP<br />
DISTRICT/ SCHOOL: EASTCHESTER/EASTCHESTER HIGH SCHOOL<br />
# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />
# OF STUDENTS: GRADE(S) 9-12<br />
DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 11/2/11-1/18/12<br />
NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />
STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 X STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4 X<br />
1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />
ARTIST: ASSOCIATED SOLO ARTISTS<br />
CONTRACT #: A8485<br />
TITLE OF PROGRAM: LEARNING ARTS MUSIC - MOVEMENT, NATURE & THE<br />
SEASONS<br />
TYPE OF PROGRAM: WORKSHOP<br />
DISTRICT/ SCHOOL: NEW ROCHELLE/COLUMBUS ELEM.<br />
# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />
# OF STUDENTS: 45 GRADE(S) 2<br />
DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 3/15/12<br />
NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />
STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 X STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />
1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />
1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />
2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />
3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />
4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />
5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />
6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />
7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />
NONE<br />
8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />
NONE<br />
9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />
ASHLEY BRINGS AN AMAZING ENERGY AND EXPERTISE TO THE<br />
PROGRAM.<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
55<br />
5<br />
5<br />
1.<br />
2.<br />
3.<br />
4.<br />
5.<br />
6.<br />
STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />
ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />
EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />
ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />
TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />
QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
N/<br />
7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />
THE PERFORMERS WERE HIGHLY ENERGETIC AND THE CHILDREN<br />
WERE ALL TOTALLY ENGAGED. THE PROGRAM COMBINED MUSIC<br />
WITH THEIR STUDY AND EXPOSED THEM TO PROFESSIONAL<br />
MUSICIANS AND A MUSICAL PERFORMANCE.<br />
8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />
NONE<br />
9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />
THE TEACHERS LOVED THIS PROGRAM AND HOPE WE CAN BRING<br />
IT BACK NEXT YEAR.<br />
Arts in Education Service - School Evaluations <strong>2011</strong>-<strong>2012</strong><br />
Page 22 of 332
ARTIST: ATL NY, INC.<br />
CONTRACT #: A7985<br />
TITLE OF PROGRAM: MIGUEL COSSIO - FIESTAS CELEBRATIONS IN<br />
MEXICO & LATIN AMERICA<br />
TYPE OF PROGRAM: WORKSHOP<br />
DISTRICT/ SCHOOL: KATONAH/LEWISBORO/KATONAH ELEM. SCHOOL<br />
# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />
# OF STUDENTS: 88 GRADE(S) 5<br />
DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 1/31/12<br />
NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />
STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 X STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4 X<br />
1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />
ARTIST: AXXANPRO23<br />
CONTRACT #: A8042B<br />
TITLE OF PROGRAM: JOHN SMITH - GUITARIST FOR THE SPRING CONCERT<br />
TYPE OF PROGRAM: ASSEMBLY<br />
DISTRICT/ SCHOOL: KATONAH/LEWISBORO/JOHN JAY MIDDLE SCHOOL<br />
# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />
# OF STUDENTS: 350 GRADE(S) 6-8<br />
DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 6/5/12<br />
NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />
STANDARD 1 STANDARD 2 STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />
1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />
1.<br />
2.<br />
3.<br />
4.<br />
5.<br />
6.<br />
STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />
ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />
EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />
ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />
TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />
QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
N/<br />
7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />
HE IS VERY KNOWLEDGEABLE. HE USES HIS PERSONAL<br />
EXPERIENCES AND BACKGROUND IN VISUAL ARTS TO MAKE THE<br />
PRESENTATION ENGAGING.<br />
8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />
NONE<br />
9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />
HE IS ALWAYS WELCOME.<br />
1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />
2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />
3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />
4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />
5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />
6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />
7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />
NONE<br />
8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />
NONE<br />
9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />
NONE<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
ARTIST: AXXANPRO23<br />
CONTRACT #: A8042A<br />
TITLE OF PROGRAM: JOHN SMITH - GUITARIST FOR THE WINTER CONCERT<br />
TYPE OF PROGRAM: RESIDENCY<br />
DISTRICT/ SCHOOL: KATONAH/LEWISBORO/JOHN JAY MIDDLE SCHOOL<br />
# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />
# OF STUDENTS: 350 GRADE(S) 6-8<br />
DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 12/1/11-1/25/12<br />
NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />
STANDARD 1 STANDARD 2 STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />
1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />
ARTIST: AZBAN, INC.<br />
CONTRACT #: A8088<br />
TITLE OF PROGRAM: JAMES BRUCHAC - NATIVE MONSTERS & ANIMAL<br />
STORIES<br />
TYPE OF PROGRAM: WORKSHOP<br />
DISTRICT/ SCHOOL: KATONAH/LEWISBORO/MEADOWPOND ELEM.<br />
# OF TEACHERS: 3<br />
# OF STUDENTS: 55` GRADE(S) 4<br />
DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 11/22/11<br />
NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />
STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 X STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4 X<br />
1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />
1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />
2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />
3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />
4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />
5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />
6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />
7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />
NONE<br />
8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />
NONE<br />
9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />
NONE<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />
2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />
3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />
4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />
5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />
6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />
7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />
NONE<br />
8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />
NONE<br />
9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />
NONE<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
Arts in Education Service - School Evaluations <strong>2011</strong>-<strong>2012</strong><br />
Page 23 of 332
ARTIST: BACKER ENTERTAINMENT, LLC CONTRACT #: A8866<br />
TITLE OF PROGRAM: SHAKE RATTLE 'N ROLL SHOW<br />
TYPE OF PROGRAM: ASSEMBLY<br />
DISTRICT/ SCHOOL:<br />
# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />
OSSINING/ROOSEVELT<br />
# OF STUDENTS: 305 GRADE(S) 5<br />
DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 6/19/12<br />
NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />
STANDARD 1 STANDARD 2 STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4 X<br />
ARTIST: BALI DALI PRODUCTIONS, INC.<br />
CONTRACT #: A8196A<br />
TITLE OF PROGRAM: ROBBI KUMALO - JAZZ ME SOME HISTORY, BABY<br />
TYPE OF PROGRAM: ASSEMBLY<br />
DISTRICT/ SCHOOL: CHAPPAQUA/BELL MIDDLE SCHOOL<br />
# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />
# OF STUDENTS: 190 GRADE(S) 6<br />
DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 1/6/12<br />
NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />
STANDARD 1 STANDARD 2 STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4 X<br />
1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />
1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />
1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />
2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />
3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />
4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />
5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />
6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />
2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />
3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />
4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />
5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />
6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
N/<br />
N/<br />
7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM?<br />
NONE<br />
Y<br />
WHY?<br />
7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM?<br />
VERY SOLID PROGRAM.<br />
Y<br />
WHY?<br />
8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />
NONE<br />
9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />
NONE<br />
8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />
NONE<br />
9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />
NONE<br />
ARTIST: BALI DALI PRODUCTIONS, INC.<br />
CONTRACT #: A8196B<br />
TITLE OF PROGRAM: ROBBI KUMALO - JAZZ ME SOME HISTORY, BABY<br />
TYPE OF PROGRAM: ASSEMBLY<br />
DISTRICT/ SCHOOL: CHAPPAQUA/SEVEN BRIDGES MIDDLE SCHOOL<br />
# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />
# OF STUDENTS: 175 GRADE(S) 6<br />
DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 1/6/12<br />
NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />
STANDARD 1 STANDARD 2 STANDARD 3 STANDARD 4 X<br />
ARTIST: BALLET AMBASSADORS<br />
CONTRACT #: A8570<br />
TITLE OF PROGRAM: SWAN LAKE BALLET<br />
TYPE OF PROGRAM: ASSEMBLY<br />
DISTRICT/ SCHOOL: DOBBS FERRY/SPRINGHURST ELEM.<br />
# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />
# OF STUDENTS: GRADE(S) K<br />
DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 3/7/12<br />
NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />
STANDARD 1 STANDARD 2 STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />
1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />
1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />
1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />
2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />
3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />
4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />
5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />
6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />
4<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
N/<br />
1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />
2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />
3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />
4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />
5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />
6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />
THERE WERE LOTS OF GOOD LESSONS AND POSITIVE STUDENT<br />
INTERACTION.<br />
8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />
NONE<br />
9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />
THANKS FOR INCLUDING OUR TEACHERS AND CURRICULUM.<br />
7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM?<br />
VERY AGE APPROPRIATE. WE ALL LOVED IT.<br />
8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />
WE THINK THE PROGRAM WAS PERFECT.<br />
9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />
A WONDERFUL DAY AND GREAT EXPERIENCE.<br />
Y<br />
WHY?<br />
Arts in Education Service - School Evaluations <strong>2011</strong>-<strong>2012</strong><br />
Page 24 of 332
ARTIST: BALLET ARTS<br />
CONTRACT #: A7961B<br />
TITLE OF PROGRAM: CHRISTINA MONITTO - CHEERLEADING<br />
TYPE OF PROGRAM: WORKSHOP<br />
DISTRICT/ SCHOOL:<br />
# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />
PELHAM/COLONIAL ELEM.<br />
# OF STUDENTS: 15 GRADE(S) K-2<br />
DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 11/30/11-2/15/12<br />
NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />
STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 X STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />
ARTIST: BALLET ARTS<br />
CONTRACT #: A8050B<br />
TITLE OF PROGRAM: FIONA DEVEAUX - IRISH STEP DANCE<br />
TYPE OF PROGRAM: WORKSHOP<br />
DISTRICT/ SCHOOL:<br />
# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />
PELHAM/PROSPECT HILL ELEM.<br />
# OF STUDENTS: 9 GRADE(S) K-2<br />
DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 1/10-3/6/12<br />
NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />
STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4 X<br />
1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />
1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />
1.<br />
2.<br />
3.<br />
4.<br />
5.<br />
6.<br />
STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />
ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />
EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />
ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />
TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />
QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
N/<br />
N/<br />
7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />
THE CHILDREN LEARNED HOW TO CHOREOGRAPH DANCES,<br />
DEVELOPED TECHNICAL SKILLS AND MOTIONS WHILE LEARNING<br />
CHEERS & CHANTS. THEY ALL HAD A WONDERFUL TIME.<br />
8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />
NONE<br />
9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />
NONE<br />
1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />
2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />
3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />
4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />
5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />
6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />
7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />
NONE<br />
8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />
NONE<br />
9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />
NONE<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
N/<br />
ARTIST: BALLET ARTS<br />
CONTRACT #: A7961A<br />
TITLE OF PROGRAM: LIA DANIELLE - MUSICAL THEATRE<br />
TYPE OF PROGRAM: WORKSHOP<br />
DISTRICT/ SCHOOL:<br />
# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />
PELHAM/COLONIAL ELEM.<br />
# OF STUDENTS: 16 GRADE(S) 3-5<br />
DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 11/28/11-2/13/12<br />
NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />
STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 X STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />
ARTIST: BALLET ARTS<br />
CONTRACT #: A8211A<br />
TITLE OF PROGRAM: SELENA COBURN - A CREATIVE MOVEMENT<br />
TYPE OF PROGRAM: WORKSHOP<br />
DISTRICT/ SCHOOL: CHAPPAQUA/ROARING BROOK ELEM.<br />
# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />
# OF STUDENTS: 9 GRADE(S) K-2<br />
DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 1/9-3/5/12<br />
NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />
STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />
1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />
1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />
1.<br />
2.<br />
3.<br />
4.<br />
5.<br />
6.<br />
STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />
ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />
EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />
ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />
TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />
QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
N/<br />
N/<br />
7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />
THE CHILDREN LOVED THIS CLASS. THEY LEARNED TO PERFORM,<br />
SING, DANCE, CHOREOGRAPH AND SCENE STUDY. BOTH THE<br />
ARTIST AND THE STUDENTS HAD A WONDERFUL EXPERIENCE.<br />
8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />
NONE<br />
9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />
NONE<br />
1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />
2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />
3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />
4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />
5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />
6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />
7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />
SELENA IS A WONDERFUL INSTRUCTOR.<br />
8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />
NONE<br />
9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />
SELENA WAS EXCEPTIONAL WITH THE SPECIAL NEEDS STUDENTS.<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
4<br />
N/<br />
Arts in Education Service - School Evaluations <strong>2011</strong>-<strong>2012</strong><br />
Page 25 of 332
ARTIST: BALLET ARTS<br />
CONTRACT #: A8050D<br />
TITLE OF PROGRAM: SELENA COBURN - ART & CULTURE OF YOGA<br />
TYPE OF PROGRAM: WORKSHOP<br />
DISTRICT/ SCHOOL:<br />
# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />
PELHAM/PROSPECT HILL ELEM.<br />
# OF STUDENTS: 10 GRADE(S) K-2<br />
DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 1/13-3/9/12<br />
NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />
STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4 X<br />
ARTIST: BALLET ARTS<br />
CONTRACT #: A8211C<br />
TITLE OF PROGRAM: SELENA COBURN - BALLET<br />
TYPE OF PROGRAM: WORKSHOP<br />
DISTRICT/ SCHOOL: CHAPPAQUA/ROARING BROOK ELEM.<br />
# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />
# OF STUDENTS: 9 GRADE(S) K-2<br />
DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 1/13-3/9/12<br />
NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />
STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />
1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />
1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />
1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />
2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />
3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />
4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />
5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />
6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
N/<br />
1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />
2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />
3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />
4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />
5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />
6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />
5<br />
5<br />
4<br />
5<br />
4<br />
N/<br />
7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM?<br />
NONE<br />
Y<br />
WHY?<br />
7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM?<br />
SALENA WAS VERY TALENTED AND PATIENT.<br />
Y<br />
WHY?<br />
8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />
NONE<br />
9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />
NONE<br />
8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />
NONE<br />
9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />
NONE<br />
ARTIST: BALLET ARTS<br />
CONTRACT #: A8211B<br />
TITLE OF PROGRAM: SELENA COBURN - HIP HOP<br />
TYPE OF PROGRAM: WORKSHOP<br />
DISTRICT/ SCHOOL: CHAPPAQUA/ROARING BROOK ELEM.<br />
# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />
# OF STUDENTS: 8 GRADE(S) 3 & 4<br />
DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 1/11-2/29/12<br />
NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />
STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4 X<br />
ARTIST: BALLET ARTS<br />
CONTRACT #: A8859<br />
TITLE OF PROGRAM: SHAREN DANIELLE - SELF ESTEEM THRU DANCE<br />
TYPE OF PROGRAM: WORKSHOP<br />
DISTRICT/ SCHOOL: WHITE PLAINS/MAMARONECK AVENUE ELEM. ELEM.<br />
# OF TEACHERS: 5<br />
# OF STUDENTS: 110 GRADE(S) K<br />
DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 5/24/12<br />
NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />
STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />
1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />
1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />
1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />
2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />
3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />
4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />
5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />
6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />
7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />
SELENA WAS VERY INTERESTED IN WORKING WITH STUDENTS.<br />
8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />
NONE<br />
9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />
NONE<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
N<br />
1.<br />
2.<br />
3.<br />
4.<br />
5.<br />
6.<br />
STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />
ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />
EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />
ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />
TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />
QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />
THIS WAS SUCH A GREAT WAY FOR THE STUDENTS TO EXPRESS<br />
THEMSELVES THROUGH DANCE MOVEMENT. THEY ENJOYED IT<br />
VERY MUCH.<br />
8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />
NONE<br />
9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />
THE INSTRUCTORS WERE SO ANIMATED AND CHILD FRIENDLY.<br />
THE CHILDREN LOVED THEM.<br />
Arts in Education Service - School Evaluations <strong>2011</strong>-<strong>2012</strong><br />
Page 26 of 332
ARTIST: BALLET HISPANICO OF NEW YORK CONTRACT #: A8775<br />
TITLE OF PROGRAM: PERFORMANCE FOR YOUNG PEOPLE<br />
TYPE OF PROGRAM: WORKSHOP<br />
DISTRICT/ SCHOOL:<br />
# OF TEACHERS: 2<br />
PELHAM/COLONIAL ELEM.<br />
# OF STUDENTS: 60 GRADE(S) 3 & 4<br />
DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 5/21-24/12<br />
NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />
STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4 X<br />
ARTIST: BARBARA BORKIN<br />
CONTRACT #: A7659A<br />
TITLE OF PROGRAM: EGYPTOLOGY STORIES, CRAFTS & CULTURE<br />
TYPE OF PROGRAM: WORKSHOP<br />
DISTRICT/ SCHOOL: EASTCHESTER/GREENVALE ELEM.<br />
# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />
# OF STUDENTS: 12 GRADE(S) 2-5<br />
DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 10/17-12/12/11<br />
NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />
STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 X STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4 X<br />
1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />
1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />
1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />
2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />
3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />
4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />
5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />
6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />
2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />
3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />
4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />
5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />
6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
N/<br />
7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />
GOOD EXPLANATION OF THE CULTURE OF EACH DANCE.<br />
7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM?<br />
NONE<br />
Y<br />
WHY?<br />
8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />
NONE<br />
9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />
WELL DONE.<br />
8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />
NONE<br />
9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />
NONE<br />
ARTIST: BARBARA BORKIN<br />
CONTRACT #: A8604<br />
TITLE OF PROGRAM: IT'S GREEK TO ME - STORIES, CRAFTS & ARTIFACTS<br />
TYPE OF PROGRAM: WORKSHOP<br />
DISTRICT/ SCHOOL: EASTCHESTER/GREENVALE ELEM.<br />
# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />
# OF STUDENTS: 14 GRADE(S) 2 & 3<br />
DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 3/14-5/9/12<br />
NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />
STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 X STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4 X<br />
ARTIST: BARBARA BORKIN<br />
CONTRACT #: A7659B<br />
TITLE OF PROGRAM: MEDIEVAL TIMES - STORIES, CRAFTS & ARTIFACTS<br />
TYPE OF PROGRAM: WORKSHOP<br />
DISTRICT/ SCHOOL: EASTCHESTER/GREENVALE ELEM.<br />
# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />
# OF STUDENTS: 12 GRADE(S) 4 & 5<br />
DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 10/18-12/13/11<br />
NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />
STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 X STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4 X<br />
1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />
1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />
1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />
2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />
3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />
4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />
5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />
6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
N/<br />
1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />
2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />
3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />
4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />
5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />
6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
N/<br />
7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y<br />
ANOTHER GREAT CREATIVE CLASS ABOUT HISTORY.<br />
WHY?<br />
7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM?<br />
NONE<br />
Y<br />
WHY?<br />
8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />
NONE<br />
9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />
NONE<br />
8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />
NONE<br />
9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />
NONE<br />
Arts in Education Service - School Evaluations <strong>2011</strong>-<strong>2012</strong><br />
Page 27 of 332
ARTIST: BARBARA BORKIN<br />
CONTRACT #: A7708<br />
TITLE OF PROGRAM: TOY STORY CRAFTS<br />
TYPE OF PROGRAM: WORKSHOP<br />
DISTRICT/ SCHOOL: EASTCHESTER/GREENVALE ELEM.<br />
# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />
# OF STUDENTS: 14 GRADE(S) 3-5<br />
DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 10/19-12/21/11<br />
NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />
STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 X STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />
ARTIST: BARBARA GARRIEL<br />
CONTRACT #: A8174<br />
TITLE OF PROGRAM: AUTHOR VISIT - WRITE AWAY<br />
TYPE OF PROGRAM: ASSEMBLY<br />
DISTRICT/ SCHOOL: LAKELAND/GEORGE WASHINGTON ELEM.<br />
# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />
# OF STUDENTS: GRADE(S) 5<br />
DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 1/25/12<br />
NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />
STANDARD 1 STANDARD 2 STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />
1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />
1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />
1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />
2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />
3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />
4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />
5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />
6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />
7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />
NONE<br />
8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />
NONE<br />
9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />
NONE<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
1.<br />
2.<br />
3.<br />
4.<br />
5.<br />
6.<br />
STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />
ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />
EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />
ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />
TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />
QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />
BARBARA DOES SUCH A GREAT JOB MAKING HER PRESENTATION<br />
INTERACTIVE AND ENGAGING. MY STUDENTS WERE ENTHUSIASTIC<br />
TO WRITE AFTER HER PRESENTATION.<br />
8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />
NONE<br />
9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />
GREAT JOB BARBARA.<br />
ARTIST: BARBARA SEGAL<br />
CONTRACT #: A8076<br />
TITLE OF PROGRAM: STONE CARVING<br />
TYPE OF PROGRAM: WORKSHOP<br />
DISTRICT/ SCHOOL:<br />
# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />
ARDSLEY/ARDSLEY HIGH SCHOOL<br />
# OF STUDENTS: GRADE(S) 10-12<br />
DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 11/21/11<br />
NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />
STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 X STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />
ARTIST: BARRY F. CORN<br />
CONTRACT #: A7501<br />
TITLE OF PROGRAM: SPANISH ART, CULTURE & LANGUAGE<br />
TYPE OF PROGRAM: WORKSHOP<br />
DISTRICT/ SCHOOL: KATONAH/LEWISBORO/INCREASE MILLER ELEM.<br />
# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />
# OF STUDENTS: 10 GRADE(S) 4 & 5<br />
DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 9/29-11/3/11<br />
NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />
STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 X STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4 X<br />
1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />
1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />
1.<br />
2.<br />
3.<br />
4.<br />
5.<br />
6.<br />
STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />
ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />
EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />
ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />
TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />
QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />
BARBARA IS AN EXCEPTIONAL SCULPTOR WHO WORKS WITH AN<br />
UNCOMMON MEDIUM, STONE. HER WEALTH OF EXPERIENCE WITH<br />
THIS MEDIUM ENABLES HER TO GUIDE STUDENTS THROUGH THE<br />
PROCESS WITH EASE.<br />
8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />
NONE. SHE IS TRULY INSPIRATIONAL.<br />
9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />
SHE IS WARM AND FRIENDLY AND HER ARTWORK WAS<br />
1.<br />
2.<br />
3.<br />
4.<br />
5.<br />
6.<br />
STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />
ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />
EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />
ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />
TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />
QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />
BARRY HAS BEEN TEACHING ADULTS FOR YEARS. HIS GREAT<br />
HUMOR AND ENGAGING TEACHING STYLE MAKES HIM A FABULOUS<br />
TEACHER.<br />
8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />
NONE<br />
9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />
FEEDBACK FROM PARENTS HAS BEEN QUITE POSITIVE.<br />
Arts in Education Service - School Evaluations <strong>2011</strong>-<strong>2012</strong><br />
Page 28 of 332
ARTIST: BARRY F. CORN<br />
CONTRACT #: A7965<br />
TITLE OF PROGRAM: SPANISH ART, CULTURE & LANGUAGE<br />
TYPE OF PROGRAM: WORKSHOP<br />
DISTRICT/ SCHOOL: KATONAH/LEWISBORO/INCREASE MILLER ELEM.<br />
# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />
# OF STUDENTS: 50 GRADE(S) 4 & 5<br />
DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE NOV., <strong>2011</strong>-JUNE, <strong>2012</strong><br />
NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />
STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 X STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4 X<br />
1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />
ARTIST: BASH THE TRASH ENVIRONMENTAL AR CONTRACT #: A8865<br />
TITLE OF PROGRAM: ENVIRONMENTAL ORCHESTRA & STORYTELLING<br />
SOUND SHOW<br />
TYPE OF PROGRAM: ASSEMBLY<br />
DISTRICT/ SCHOOL:<br />
# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />
OSSINING/BROOKSIDE ELEM.<br />
# OF STUDENTS: 710 GRADE(S) 2 & 3<br />
DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 6/18/12<br />
NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />
STANDARD 1 STANDARD 2 STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />
1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />
1.<br />
2.<br />
3.<br />
4.<br />
5.<br />
6.<br />
STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />
ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />
EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />
ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />
TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />
QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />
BARRY HAS BEEN TEACHING ADULTS FOR YEARS. HIS GREAT<br />
HUMOR AND ENGAGING TEACHING STYLE MAKES HIM A FABULOUS<br />
TEACHER FOR CHILDREN. HE HAS A RICH KNOWLEDGE OF THE<br />
TOPICS HE COVERS. HE IS WONDERFUL WITH THE STUDENTS. HE<br />
IS ENTERTAINING AND KEEPS THE STUDENTS FOCUSED.<br />
8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />
NONE<br />
9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />
FEEDBACK FROM PARENTS HAS BEEN QUITE POSITIVE. WE<br />
WOULD RECOMMEND BARRY TO OTHER SCHOOLS.<br />
1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />
2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />
3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />
4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />
5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />
6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />
7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />
NONE<br />
8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />
NONE<br />
9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />
NONE<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
ARTIST: BASH THE TRASH ENVIRONMENTAL AR CONTRACT #: A7875<br />
TITLE OF PROGRAM: ENVIRONMENTAL ORCHESTRA & STORYTELLING<br />
SOUND SHOW<br />
TYPE OF PROGRAM: ASSEMBLY<br />
DISTRICT/ SCHOOL:<br />
# OF TEACHERS: 5<br />
BYRAM HILLS/WAMPUS ELEM.<br />
# OF STUDENTS: 200 GRADE(S) 3<br />
DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 5/1/12<br />
NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />
STANDARD 1 STANDARD 2 STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />
ARTIST: BASH THE TRASH ENVIRONMENTAL AR CONTRACT #: A8565<br />
TITLE OF PROGRAM: ENVIRONMENTAL ORCHESTRA & STORYTELLING<br />
SOUND SHOW<br />
TYPE OF PROGRAM: ASSEMBLY<br />
DISTRICT/ SCHOOL:<br />
# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />
YORKTOWN/CROMPOND ELEM.<br />
# OF STUDENTS: 575 GRADE(S) 4 & 5<br />
DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 4/20/12<br />
NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />
STANDARD 1 STANDARD 2 STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />
1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />
1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />
1.<br />
2.<br />
3.<br />
4.<br />
5.<br />
6.<br />
STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />
ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />
EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />
ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />
TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />
QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />
THIS PROGRAM HAS A WONDERFUL CONNECTION BETWEEN MUSIC<br />
AND SUSTAINABILITY.<br />
8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />
NONE<br />
9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />
NONE<br />
1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />
2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />
3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />
4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />
5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />
6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />
7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />
PROGRAM WAS FUN, EDUCATIONAL AND THE CHILDREN WERE<br />
TRULY ENTERTAINED.<br />
8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />
NONE<br />
9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />
NONE<br />
4<br />
5<br />
4<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
Arts in Education Service - School Evaluations <strong>2011</strong>-<strong>2012</strong><br />
Page 29 of 332
ARTIST: BASH THE TRASH ENVIRONMENTAL AR<br />
CONTRACT #: A8614<br />
TITLE OF PROGRAM: ENVIRONMENTAL ORCHESTRA & STORYTELLING<br />
SOUND SHOW<br />
TYPE OF PROGRAM: ASSEMBLY/WORKSHOP<br />
DISTRICT/ SCHOOL: KATONAH/LEWISBORO/INCREASE MILLER ELEM.<br />
# OF TEACHERS: 3<br />
# OF STUDENTS: 350 GRADE(S) K-6<br />
DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 5/3-7/12<br />
NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />
STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 X STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />
ARTIST: BASH THE TRASH ENVIRONMENTAL AR CONTRACT #: A8408<br />
TITLE OF PROGRAM: JOHN BERTLES - MAKING INSTRUMENTS FROM<br />
RECYCLED MATERIALS<br />
TYPE OF PROGRAM: ASSEMBLY<br />
DISTRICT/ SCHOOL: EASTCHESTER/WAVERLY EARLY CHILDHOOD CTR<br />
# OF TEACHERS: 15 # OF STUDENTS: 500 GRADE(S) K & 1<br />
DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 3/30/12<br />
NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />
STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 X STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4 X<br />
1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />
1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />
1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />
2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />
3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />
4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />
5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />
6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />
7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />
NONE<br />
8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />
NONE<br />
9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />
WONDERFUL PROGRAM. FUN AND EDUCATIONAL.<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />
2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />
3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />
4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />
5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />
6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />
7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />
THE SHOW IS EXTREMELY INTERACTIVE AND ENGAGING. IT TIES IN<br />
WELL TO THE 1ST GRADE CURRICULUM AND THE STUDY OF WIND,<br />
WHICH TAKES PLACE IN MARCH.<br />
8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />
THIS SHOW IS FANTASTIC, EXTREMELY ENGAGING, INTERACTIVE<br />
AND RELEVANT TO THE CURRICULUM AND TO EARTH DAY.<br />
9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />
IT IS A REALLY GOOD WAY TO PRESENT THE ARTS AND SCIENTIFIC<br />
CONCERPTS AS WELL AS RECYCLING INFORMATION. THE<br />
CHILDREN LOVED IT AND IT WAS EDUCATIONAL. IT HELD THEIR<br />
INTEREST AS WELL.<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
ARTIST: BASH THE TRASH ENVIRONMENTAL AR CONTRACT #: A8820<br />
TITLE OF PROGRAM: MAKING INSTRUMENTS FROM RECYCLED<br />
MATERIALS & SHOW<br />
TYPE OF PROGRAM: ASSEMBLY/WORKSHOP<br />
DISTRICT/ SCHOOL:<br />
# OF TEACHERS: 3<br />
PELHAM/SIWANOY ELEM.<br />
# OF STUDENTS: 60 GRADE(S) 3<br />
DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 6/6/12<br />
NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />
STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 X STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />
ARTIST: BAYLIN ARTS MANAGEMENT<br />
CONTRACT #: A7794<br />
TITLE OF PROGRAM: GARRY KRINSKY - TOYING WITH THE ARTS OF<br />
SCIENCE<br />
TYPE OF PROGRAM: ASSEMBLY<br />
DISTRICT/ SCHOOL: EASTCHESTER/EASTCHESTER MIDDLE SCHOOL<br />
# OF TEACHERS: 10 # OF STUDENTS: 250 GRADE(S) 6<br />
DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 5/24/12<br />
NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />
STANDARD 1 STANDARD 2 STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />
1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />
1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />
1.<br />
2.<br />
3.<br />
4.<br />
5.<br />
6.<br />
STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />
ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />
EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />
ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />
TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />
QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />
THE PERFORMANCE WAS VERY ENGAGING AND INFORMATIVE. THE<br />
INFORMATION PROVIDED WAS AT THEIR LEVEL AND JUST THE<br />
RIGHT AMOUNT SO IT WASN'T OVERWHELMING FOR THE STUDENTS<br />
TO UNDERSTAND.<br />
8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />
NONE<br />
9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />
WE HOPE TO WELCOME THEM BACK NEXT YEAR.<br />
1.<br />
2.<br />
3.<br />
4.<br />
5.<br />
6.<br />
STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />
ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />
EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />
ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />
TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />
QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />
IT WAS A WONDERFUL SHOW. GARRY IS FULL OF ENERGY, VERY<br />
BRIGHT AND ENTERTAINING.<br />
8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />
NONE<br />
9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />
NONE<br />
Arts in Education Service - School Evaluations <strong>2011</strong>-<strong>2012</strong><br />
Page 30 of 332
ARTIST: BAYLIN ARTS MANAGEMENT<br />
CONTRACT #: A7673<br />
TITLE OF PROGRAM: RED GRAMMER - MUSICAL SHOW<br />
TYPE OF PROGRAM: ASSEMBLY<br />
DISTRICT/ SCHOOL:<br />
# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />
SOMERS/PRIMROSE ELEM.<br />
# OF STUDENTS: 740 GRADE(S) K-2<br />
DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 10/19/11<br />
NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />
STANDARD 1 STANDARD 2 STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />
ARTIST: BEADZ - MELANIE ROSE<br />
CONTRACT #: A7621A<br />
TITLE OF PROGRAM: BEADING I<br />
TYPE OF PROGRAM: WORKSHOP<br />
DISTRICT/ SCHOOL:<br />
# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />
PELHAM/HUTCHINSON ELEM.<br />
# OF STUDENTS: 7 GRADE(S) K-5<br />
DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 10/14-12/9/11<br />
NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />
STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 X STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />
1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />
1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />
1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />
2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />
3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />
4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />
5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />
6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />
7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />
WE LOVE RED. TEACHERS AND STUDENTS ASK FOR HIM EVERY<br />
YEAR.<br />
8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />
NONE<br />
9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />
NONE<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
N/<br />
1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />
2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />
3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />
4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />
5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />
6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />
7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />
MELANIE IS A PLEASURE TO WORK WITH.<br />
8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />
NONE<br />
9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />
THE STUDENTS LOOK FORWARD TO HER CLASS YEAR AFTER YEAR.<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
ARTIST: BEADZ - MELANIE ROSE<br />
CONTRACT #: A8367A<br />
TITLE OF PROGRAM: BEADING I<br />
TYPE OF PROGRAM: WORKSHOP<br />
DISTRICT/ SCHOOL:<br />
# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />
PELHAM/HUTCHINSON ELEM.<br />
# OF STUDENTS: 10 GRADE(S) K-5<br />
DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 2/3-3/30/12<br />
NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />
STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 X STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />
ARTIST: BEADZ - MELANIE ROSE<br />
CONTRACT #: A7621B<br />
TITLE OF PROGRAM: BEADING II<br />
TYPE OF PROGRAM: WORKSHOP<br />
DISTRICT/ SCHOOL:<br />
# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />
PELHAM/HUTCHINSON ELEM.<br />
# OF STUDENTS: GRADE(S) K-5<br />
DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 10/17-12/5/11<br />
NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />
STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 X STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />
1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />
1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />
1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />
2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />
3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />
4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />
5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />
6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />
2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />
3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />
4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />
5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />
6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM?<br />
MELANIE IS A PLEASURE TO WORK WITH.<br />
Y<br />
WHY?<br />
7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />
MELANIE'S CLASS CONTINUES TO BE A POPULAR CHOICE.<br />
8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />
NONE<br />
9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />
NONE<br />
8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />
NONE<br />
9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />
EVERYONE LOVES THE FINISHED PRODUCTS.<br />
Arts in Education Service - School Evaluations <strong>2011</strong>-<strong>2012</strong><br />
Page 31 of 332
ARTIST: BEADZ - MELANIE ROSE<br />
CONTRACT #: A8367B<br />
TITLE OF PROGRAM: BEADING II<br />
TYPE OF PROGRAM: WORKSHOP<br />
DISTRICT/ SCHOOL:<br />
# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />
PELHAM/HUTCHINSON ELEM.<br />
# OF STUDENTS: 9 GRADE(S) K-5<br />
DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 2/6-3/26/12<br />
NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />
STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 X STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />
ARTIST: BEAUTY & THE BEAST STORYTELLERS CONTRACT #: A8812<br />
TITLE OF PROGRAM: MITCH WEISS & MARTHA HAMILTON SOTRYTELLING<br />
TYPE OF PROGRAM: ASSEMBLY/WORKSHOP<br />
DISTRICT/ SCHOOL: HENDRICK HUDSON/FURNACE WOODS ELEM.<br />
# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />
# OF STUDENTS: GRADE(S) K-5<br />
DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 5/22-24/12<br />
NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />
STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 X STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />
1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />
1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />
1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />
2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />
3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />
4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />
5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />
6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />
2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />
3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />
4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />
5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />
6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM?<br />
MELANIE IS A PLEASURE TO WORK WITH.<br />
Y<br />
WHY?<br />
7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM?<br />
THEY ARE OUTSTANDING.<br />
Y<br />
WHY?<br />
8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />
NONE<br />
9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />
NONE<br />
8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />
NONE<br />
9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />
WORKING WITH MARTHA AND MITCH IS THE HIGHLIGHT OF THE<br />
YEAR.<br />
ARTIST: BEAUTY & THE BEAST STORYTELLERS CONTRACT #: A8142<br />
TITLE OF PROGRAM: MITCH WEISS & MARTHA HAMILTON STORYTELLING<br />
TYPE OF PROGRAM: ASSEMBLY/WORKSHOP<br />
DISTRICT/ SCHOOL: KATONAH/LEWISBORO/INCREASE MILLER ELEM.<br />
# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />
# OF STUDENTS: GRADE(S) K-4<br />
DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 12/1 & 2/11<br />
NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />
STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 X STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />
ARTIST: BELINDA RITTER<br />
CONTRACT #: A8706<br />
TITLE OF PROGRAM: DRUMMING & PERCUSSION MUSIC<br />
TYPE OF PROGRAM: WORKSHOP<br />
DISTRICT/ SCHOOL:<br />
# OF TEACHERS: 3<br />
PEEKSKILL/OAKSIDE ELEM.<br />
# OF STUDENTS: 160 GRADE(S) 2 & 3<br />
DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 4/16-6/8/12<br />
NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />
STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 X STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4 X<br />
1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />
1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />
1.<br />
2.<br />
3.<br />
4.<br />
5.<br />
6.<br />
STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />
ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />
EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />
ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />
TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />
QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />
THEY ARE MASTERS OF THEIR CRAFT. THEY BROUGHT A WEALTH<br />
OF KNOWLEDGE AND EXPERIENCE AND INTERACTED VERY WELL<br />
WITH THE STUDENTS. IT WAS AMAZING TO SEE THE RESULTS THEY<br />
GOT IN SUCH A SHORT AMOUNT OF TIME.<br />
8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />
NONE<br />
9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />
NONE<br />
1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />
2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />
3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />
4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />
5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />
6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />
7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />
THIS IS A GREAT WAY TO DEVELOP CHILDREN'S EYE/HAND/EAR<br />
COORDINATION.<br />
8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />
NONE<br />
9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />
SHE IS A VERY ENTHUSIASTIC AND PROFESSIONAL TEACHING<br />
ARTIST. LOOKING FORWARD TO WORKING WITH HER AGAIN.<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
N/<br />
Arts in Education Service - School Evaluations <strong>2011</strong>-<strong>2012</strong><br />
Page 32 of 332
ARTIST: BENJAMIN TRAVIS<br />
CONTRACT #: A8439<br />
TITLE OF PROGRAM: LIGHTING DESIGNER FOR THE SHOW - A FUNNY<br />
THING HAPPENED ON THE WAY TO THE FORUM<br />
TYPE OF PROGRAM: RESIDENCY<br />
DISTRICT/ SCHOOL: PUTNAM VALLEY/PUTNAM VALLEY HIGH SCHOOL<br />
# OF TEACHERS: 3<br />
# OF STUDENTS: 400 GRADE(S) 9-12<br />
DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 3/3-4/23/12<br />
NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />
STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 X STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />
1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />
ARTIST: BENJAMIN TRAVIS<br />
CONTRACT #: A7820<br />
TITLE OF PROGRAM: LIGHTING DESIGNER FOR THE SHOW - DRACULA<br />
TYPE OF PROGRAM: RESIDENCY<br />
DISTRICT/ SCHOOL: PUTNAM VALLEY/PUTNAM VALLEY HIGH SCHOOL<br />
# OF TEACHERS: 2<br />
# OF STUDENTS: 9 GRADE(S) 9-12<br />
DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 11/1-12/5/11<br />
NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />
STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 X STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />
1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />
1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />
2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />
3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />
4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />
5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />
6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />
7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />
NONE<br />
8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />
NONE<br />
9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />
NONE<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />
2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />
3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />
4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />
5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />
6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />
7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />
NONE<br />
8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />
NONE<br />
9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />
NONE<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
ARTIST: BERNARD MONROE<br />
CONTRACT #: A7647<br />
TITLE OF PROGRAM: MUSICAL THEATRE & DANCE<br />
TYPE OF PROGRAM: RESIDENCY<br />
DISTRICT/ SCHOOL: YORKTOWN/YORKTOWN HIGH SCHOOL<br />
# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />
# OF STUDENTS: GRADE(S) 9-12<br />
DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 11/14/11-3/25/12<br />
NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />
STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 X STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />
ARTIST: BETSY DUBOIS AGENCY, INC.<br />
CONTRACT #: A8863<br />
TITLE OF PROGRAM: BALL IN THE HOUSE - A CAPPELLA GROUP<br />
TYPE OF PROGRAM: ASSEMBLY<br />
DISTRICT/ SCHOOL: KATONAH/LEWISBORO/INCREASE MILLER ELEM.<br />
# OF TEACHERS: 5<br />
# OF STUDENTS: 340 GRADE(S) K-5<br />
DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 5/16/12<br />
NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />
STANDARD 1 STANDARD 2 STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4 X<br />
1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />
1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />
1.<br />
2.<br />
3.<br />
4.<br />
5.<br />
6.<br />
STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />
ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />
EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />
ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />
TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />
QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />
HAVING A PROFESSIONAL CHOREOGRAPHER WHO IS A WORKING<br />
ARTIST WITH PROFESSIONAL STANDARDS IS AN EXCELLENT<br />
EXPERIENCE FOR STUDENTS.<br />
8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />
NONE<br />
9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />
THIS PROGRAM MAKES THE MUSICAL A HIGHLY PROFESSIONAL<br />
AND RICH LEARNING EXPERIENCE FOR THE STUDENTS. THEY<br />
RESPONDED ENTHUSIASTICALLY TO THE EXPERIENCE.<br />
1.<br />
2.<br />
3.<br />
4.<br />
5.<br />
6.<br />
STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />
ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />
EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />
ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />
TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />
QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />
THEY ARE EXTRAORDINARY PERFORMERS WHO DEMONSTRATED<br />
THEIR CRAFT AND EXPLAINED HOW THEY DO IT. THEY ALSO<br />
EMPHASIZED THAT EVERYONE HAS THE ABILITY TO CREATE MUSIC<br />
AND WRITE THEIR OWN SONGS.<br />
8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />
NONE<br />
9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />
NONE<br />
Arts in Education Service - School Evaluations <strong>2011</strong>-<strong>2012</strong><br />
Page 33 of 332
ARTIST: BEVERLY BARKER<br />
CONTRACT #: A7697<br />
TITLE OF PROGRAM: DESIGNING & CREATING A COLONIAL YARN DOLL<br />
TYPE OF PROGRAM: WORKSHOP<br />
DISTRICT/ SCHOOL: CHAPPAQUA/ROARING BROOK ELEM.<br />
# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />
# OF STUDENTS: 95 GRADE(S) 2<br />
DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 11/21/11<br />
NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />
STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 X STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4 X<br />
ARTIST: BEVERLY BARKER<br />
CONTRACT #: A7664<br />
TITLE OF PROGRAM: SEWING AMERICAN GIRL FASHIONS / CRAFTS<br />
TYPE OF PROGRAM: WORKSHOP<br />
DISTRICT/ SCHOOL: EASTCHESTER/GREENVALE ELEM.<br />
# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />
# OF STUDENTS: 9 GRADE(S) 2-4<br />
DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 10/20-12/15/11<br />
NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />
STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 X STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />
1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />
1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />
1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />
2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />
3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />
4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />
5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />
6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />
7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />
NONE<br />
8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />
NONE<br />
9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />
NONE<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
1.<br />
2.<br />
3.<br />
4.<br />
5.<br />
6.<br />
STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />
ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />
EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />
ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />
TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />
QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />
A REALLY GREAT CLASS FOCUSING ON THE ART OF SEWING WHILE<br />
COVERING A BIT OF HISTORY.<br />
8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />
NONE<br />
9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />
NONE<br />
ARTIST: BEVERLY BARKER<br />
CONTRACT #: A8599<br />
TITLE OF PROGRAM: SEWING AMERICAN GIRL FASHIONS / CRAFTS<br />
TYPE OF PROGRAM: WORKSHOP<br />
DISTRICT/ SCHOOL: EASTCHESTER/GREENVALE ELEM.<br />
# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />
# OF STUDENTS: 8 GRADE(S) 2-4<br />
DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 3/8-5/10/12<br />
NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />
STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 X STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />
ARTIST: BIERKO PRODUCTIONS, LLC<br />
CONTRACT #: A7755<br />
TITLE OF PROGRAM: SCOTT & BETH - CREATING A HIT SONG<br />
TYPE OF PROGRAM: RESIDENCY<br />
DISTRICT/ SCHOOL:<br />
# OF TEACHERS: 3<br />
PEEKSKILL/OAKSIDE ELEM.<br />
# OF STUDENTS: 250 GRADE(S) 2 & 3<br />
DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 10/17/11<br />
NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />
STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 X STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />
1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />
1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />
1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />
2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />
3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />
4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />
5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />
6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />
7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />
GREAT CLASS.<br />
8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />
NONE<br />
9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />
NONE<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
N/<br />
1.<br />
2.<br />
3.<br />
4.<br />
5.<br />
6.<br />
STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />
ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />
EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />
ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />
TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />
QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />
WE WOULD DEFINITELY RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM. THIS<br />
PROGRAM GAVE OUR STUDENTS THE OPPORTUNITY TO CREATE<br />
THEIR OWN SONG WHICH ENPOWERED AND MOTIVATED THEM.<br />
8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />
NONE<br />
9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />
NONE<br />
Arts in Education Service - School Evaluations <strong>2011</strong>-<strong>2012</strong><br />
Page 34 of 332
ARTIST: BIERKO PRODUCTIONS, LLC<br />
CONTRACT #: A7654<br />
TITLE OF PROGRAM: SCOTT & BETH - GOLDEN RULE SHOW<br />
TYPE OF PROGRAM: ASSEMBLY<br />
DISTRICT/ SCHOOL:<br />
# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />
OSSINING/PARK SCHOOL<br />
# OF STUDENTS: 41 GRADE(S) PRE K &<br />
DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 6/18/12<br />
NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />
STANDARD 1 STANDARD 2 STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />
ARTIST: BIERKO PRODUCTIONS, LLC<br />
CONTRACT #: A8148<br />
TITLE OF PROGRAM: SCOTT & BETH - GOLDEN RULE SHOW<br />
TYPE OF PROGRAM: ASSEMBLY<br />
DISTRICT/ SCHOOL: EASTCHESTER/WAVERLY EARLY CHILDHOOD CTR<br />
# OF TEACHERS: 12 # OF STUDENTS: 500 GRADE(S) K & 1<br />
DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 12/5/11<br />
NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />
STANDARD 1 STANDARD 2 STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />
1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />
1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />
1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />
2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />
3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />
4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />
5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />
6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />
7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />
THE KINDERGARTENS LOVED THE INTERACTION AND MOVEMENTS.<br />
GRADES 1-2 WOULD ALSO BENEFIT.<br />
8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />
WHEN THEY HAD THE KIDS HOLD HANDS, IT WOULD BE HELPFUL<br />
TO ALERT THE TEACHERS SO IT IS A LITTLE MORE ORGANIZED.<br />
9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />
NONE<br />
ARTIST: BIERKO PRODUCTIONS, LLC<br />
CONTRACT #: A8518<br />
TITLE OF PROGRAM: SCOTT & BETH - GOLDEN RULE SHOW<br />
TYPE OF PROGRAM: ASSEMBLY<br />
DISTRICT/ SCHOOL:<br />
PEEKSKILL/WOODSIDE ELEM.<br />
# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />
# OF STUDENTS: GRADE(S) K & 1<br />
DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE<br />
3/20/12<br />
NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />
STANDARD 1 STANDARD 2 STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />
1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />
5<br />
4<br />
4<br />
5<br />
4<br />
N/<br />
1.<br />
2.<br />
3.<br />
4.<br />
5.<br />
6.<br />
STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />
ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />
EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />
ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />
TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />
QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />
THIS PROGRAM WAS EXCITING, INTERACTIVE, HANDS-ON AND FUN<br />
FOR THE STUDENTS. THEY USED HUMOR, SONGS, DANCES AND<br />
STORYTELLING TO DISCUSS THE TOPICS OF RESPECT, KINDNESS,<br />
ANTI BULLYING, USING GOOD MANNERS, FOLLOWING THE RULES<br />
AND HAVING A PEACEFUL SCHOOL ENVIRONMENT.<br />
8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />
NONE<br />
9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />
ARTIST:<br />
THEY ARE WONDERFUL AND TALENTED PERFORMERS. WE LOOK<br />
FORWARD TO HAVING THEM AGAIN.<br />
BIERKO PRODUCTIONS, LLC<br />
CONTRACT #: A8113<br />
TITLE OF PROGRAM: SCOTT & BETH - HAPPY HOLIDAYS AROUND THE<br />
WORLD<br />
TYPE OF PROGRAM: ASSEMBLY<br />
DISTRICT/ SCHOOL:<br />
MTP/HAWTHORNE ELEM.<br />
# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />
# OF STUDENTS: 420 GRADE(S) K-2<br />
DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 12/19/11<br />
NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />
STANDARD 1 STANDARD 2 STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4 X<br />
1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />
1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />
2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />
3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />
4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />
5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />
6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />
7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />
WONDERFUL SHOW AND THE STUDENTS LOVED IT.<br />
8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />
NONE<br />
9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />
NONE<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
1.<br />
2.<br />
3.<br />
4.<br />
5.<br />
6.<br />
STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />
ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />
EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />
ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />
TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />
QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />
THE ARTISTS MADE CHILDREN AWARE OF DIFFERENT HOLIDAY<br />
TRADITIONS CELEBRATED AROUND THE WORLD HAVING SIMILAR<br />
THEMES - FAMILY, TOLERANCE, LOVE, RESPECT FOR ALL WHILE<br />
UTILIZING MUSIC AND RHYTHMS TO ENGAGE THE STUDENTS.<br />
THEIR USE OF TEACHER PARTICIPATION ENGAGED THE STUDENTS<br />
EVEN MORE.<br />
8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />
NONE<br />
9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />
NONE<br />
Arts in Education Service - School Evaluations <strong>2011</strong>-<strong>2012</strong><br />
Page 35 of 332
ARTIST: BIERKO PRODUCTIONS, LLC<br />
CONTRACT #: A8149<br />
TITLE OF PROGRAM: SCOTT & BETH - NUTRITION MISSION<br />
TYPE OF PROGRAM: ASSEMBLY<br />
DISTRICT/ SCHOOL: EASTCHESTER/WAVERLY EARLY CHILDHOOD CTR<br />
# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />
# OF STUDENTS: 525 GRADE(S) 2<br />
DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 1/12/12<br />
NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />
STANDARD 1 STANDARD 2 STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />
ARTIST: BIERKO PRODUCTIONS, LLC<br />
CONTRACT #: A8642<br />
TITLE OF PROGRAM: SCOTT & BETH - NUTRITION MISSION<br />
TYPE OF PROGRAM: ASSEMBLY<br />
DISTRICT/ SCHOOL:<br />
# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />
MTP/HAWTHORNE ELEM.<br />
# OF STUDENTS: 420 GRADE(S) K-2<br />
DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 3/27/12<br />
NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />
STANDARD 1 STANDARD 2 STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />
1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />
1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />
1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />
2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />
3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />
4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />
5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />
6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />
7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />
THE SHOW WAS HIGHLY INTERACTIVE AND ENGAGING. IT HELD<br />
THE STUDENTS' INTEREST AND ATTENTION WHILE TEACHING<br />
ABOUT THE IMPORTANCE OF HEALTHY EATING, DRINKING WATER<br />
AND PHYSICAL ACTIVITY.<br />
8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />
PART OF THE SHOW ASKS FOR TEACHER PARTICIPATION IN A<br />
SONG. MANY TEACHERS FEEL SHY OR HESITANT ABOUT<br />
PERFORMING AND BEING IN-STAGE. PERHAPS, THEY COULD ASK<br />
FOR STUDENT VOLUNTEERS.<br />
9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />
THERE WAS AN ACTIVITY CALLED THE SNOWBALL FIGHT IN WHICH<br />
STUDENTS THROW SNOWBALLS AT EACH OTHER AS WELL AS THE<br />
TEACHERS. THE TEACHERS FELT THAT IT IS DISRESPECTFUL AND<br />
THAT THE STUDENTS SHOULD ONLY THROW THE SNOWBALLS AT<br />
EACH OTHER.<br />
ARTIST: BLUE FLOWER ARTS, LLC<br />
CONTRACT #: A7805<br />
TITLE OF PROGRAM: TAYLOR MALI - SLAM POETRY<br />
TYPE OF PROGRAM: ASSEMBLY<br />
DISTRICT/ SCHOOL:<br />
CHAPPAQUA/BELL MIDDLE SCHOOL<br />
# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />
# OF STUDENTS: 200 GRADE(S) 7<br />
DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE<br />
11/7/11<br />
NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />
STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />
2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />
3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />
4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />
5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />
6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />
7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />
THE ARTISTS MADE CHILDREN AWARE ABOUT HEALTHY<br />
NUTRITIONAL AND FITNESS CHOICES WHILE USING MUSIC AND<br />
RHYTHMS TO ENGAGE THEM.<br />
8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />
NONE<br />
9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />
THE ARTISTS REALLY WORK WELL WITH THE CHILDREN AND THEIR<br />
PRESENTATION WAS FUN AND MEMORABLE.<br />
ARTIST: BOKANDEYE AFRICAN AMERICAN DANC CONTRACT #: A7652<br />
TITLE OF PROGRAM: AFRICAN AMERICAN DANCE<br />
TYPE OF PROGRAM: ASSEMBLY<br />
DISTRICT/ SCHOOL:<br />
OSSINING/PARK SCHOOL<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
N/<br />
# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />
# OF STUDENTS: 400 GRADE(S) PRE K &<br />
DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE<br />
2/17/12<br />
NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />
STANDARD 1 STANDARD 2 STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4 X<br />
1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />
1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />
1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />
2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />
3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />
4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />
5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />
6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />
7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />
EACH ASSEMBLY WAS APPROX 100 STUDENTS WHICH CAN BE<br />
DAUNTING, BUT THEY WERE RIVETED.<br />
8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />
NEEDED TO PUT POETRY SLAM IN CONTEXT A LITTLE.<br />
9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />
WE WANT HIM BACK.<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
4<br />
4<br />
3<br />
1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />
2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />
3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />
4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />
5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />
6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />
7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />
THE DRUMMING AND DANCING WAS EXCELLENT.<br />
8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />
THIS GROUP NEEDS A GOOD SOUND SYSTEM. IT IS DIFFICULT TO<br />
HEAR SPEAKING AND SINGING DURING THE PROGRAM.<br />
9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />
NONE<br />
4<br />
5<br />
3<br />
4<br />
3<br />
N/<br />
Arts in Education Service - School Evaluations <strong>2011</strong>-<strong>2012</strong><br />
Page 36 of 332
ARTIST: BOKANDEYE AFRICAN AMERICAN DANC CONTRACT #: A8191<br />
TITLE OF PROGRAM: WEST AFRICAN DANCE & DRUM<br />
TYPE OF PROGRAM: ASSEMBLY<br />
DISTRICT/ SCHOOL: DOBBS FERRY/DOBBS FERRY MIDDLE SCHOOL<br />
# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />
# OF STUDENTS: 335 GRADE(S) 6-8<br />
DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 2/17/12<br />
NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />
STANDARD 1 STANDARD 2 STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4 X<br />
ARTIST: BOOMZOOM MEDIA, LLC<br />
CONTRACT #: A8134<br />
TITLE OF PROGRAM: KATIE DAVIS - AUTHOR/ILLUSTRATOR VISIT<br />
TYPE OF PROGRAM: WORKSHOP<br />
DISTRICT/ SCHOOL: CHAPPAQUA/WESTORCHARD ELEM.<br />
# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />
# OF STUDENTS: 90 GRADE(S) K<br />
DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 3/14/12<br />
NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />
STANDARD 1 STANDARD 2 STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />
1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />
1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />
1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />
2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />
3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />
4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />
5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />
6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />
7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />
THE PERFORMANCE WAS HIGH ENERGY AND ALLOWED THE<br />
STUDENTS TO EXPERIENCE ART.<br />
8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />
AN EXPLANATION OF EACH DANCE BEFORE AND AFTER WOULD<br />
HAVE BEEN INFORMATIVE.<br />
9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />
NONE<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
1.<br />
2.<br />
3.<br />
4.<br />
5.<br />
6.<br />
STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />
ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />
EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />
ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />
TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />
QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />
3<br />
5<br />
4<br />
3<br />
N/<br />
N/<br />
7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? N WHY?<br />
WE FELT THAT THE PROGRAM DID NOT WORK FOR OUR STUDENTS.<br />
8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />
WE FEEL THAT IT WOULD BE BENEFICIAL IF THE ARTIST WOULD<br />
OFFER MORE WRITING TIPS TO THE STUDENTS.<br />
9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />
NONE<br />
ARTIST: BOSSY FROG PRODUCTIONS, LLC CONTRACT #: A7655<br />
TITLE OF PROGRAM: BOSSY FROG BAND<br />
TYPE OF PROGRAM: ASSEMBLY<br />
DISTRICT/ SCHOOL:<br />
# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />
OSSINING/PARK SCHOOL<br />
# OF STUDENTS: 250 GRADE(S) PRE K<br />
DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 4/16/12<br />
NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />
STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />
ARTIST: BRADLEY FIELDS PRODUCTIONS CONTRACT #: A7732<br />
TITLE OF PROGRAM: MATHEMAGIC SHOW<br />
TYPE OF PROGRAM: ASSEMBLY<br />
DISTRICT/ SCHOOL: EASTCHESTER/EASTCHESTER MIDDLE SCHOOL<br />
# OF TEACHERS: 10 # OF STUDENTS: 248 GRADE(S) 6<br />
DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 1/2/12<br />
NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />
STANDARD 1 STANDARD 2 STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />
1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />
1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />
1.<br />
2.<br />
3.<br />
4.<br />
5.<br />
6.<br />
STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />
ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />
EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />
ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />
TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />
QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
N/<br />
7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />
THEY WERE FANTASTIC. WE HOPE WE CAN HAVE THEM VISIT OUR<br />
SCHOOL AGAIN.<br />
8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />
NONE<br />
9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />
NONE<br />
1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />
2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />
3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />
4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />
5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />
6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />
7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />
NONE<br />
8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />
BRADLEY WASN'T AS ORGANIZED AS HE USUALLY IS. HE SEEMED<br />
SCATTERED.<br />
9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />
BRADLEY ALWAYS PUTS ON A GREAT SHOW. HOWEVER, TODAY<br />
HE SEEMED "OFF" HIS GAME A BIT. HE WASN'T ABLE TO FINISH HIS<br />
SHOW TODAY.<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
4<br />
5<br />
Arts in Education Service - School Evaluations <strong>2011</strong>-<strong>2012</strong><br />
Page 37 of 332
ARTIST:<br />
BRENDA CONNOR-BEY MILLER<br />
CONTRACT #: A7595C<br />
TITLE OF PROGRAM: EXPERIENTIAL LEARNING THROUGH THE ARTS: THE<br />
OTHER SIDE OF THE MIRROR: WHILE I WAS<br />
DREAMING<br />
TYPE OF PROGRAM: RESIDENCY<br />
DISTRICT/ SCHOOL:<br />
HAWTHORNE CEDAR KNOLLS/JR. & SENIOR HIGH SC<br />
# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />
# OF STUDENTS: GRADE(S) 7-12<br />
DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE<br />
12/14/11-2/1/12<br />
NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />
STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 X STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />
ARTIST:<br />
BRENDA CONNOR-BEY MILLER<br />
CONTRACT #: A7595B<br />
TITLE OF PROGRAM: EXPERIENTIAL LEARNING THROUGH THE ARTS: THE<br />
OTHER SIDE OF THE MIRROR: WHILE I WAS<br />
DREAMING<br />
TYPE OF PROGRAM: RESIDENCY<br />
DISTRICT/ SCHOOL:<br />
HAWTHORNE CEDAR KNOLLS/JR. & SENIOR HIGH SC<br />
# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />
# OF STUDENTS: GRADE(S) 7-12<br />
DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 11/10-12/8/11<br />
NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />
STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 X STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />
1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />
1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />
1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />
2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />
3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />
4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />
5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />
6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
4<br />
1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />
2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />
3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />
4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />
5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />
6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y<br />
IT HAS BEEN A GREAT ASSET TO OUR COMMUNITY.<br />
WHY?<br />
7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y<br />
LESSONS ARE WELL THOUGHT OUT AND ENGAGING.<br />
WHY?<br />
8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />
NONE<br />
9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />
NONE<br />
8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />
NONE<br />
9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />
NONE<br />
ARTIST: BRENDA CONNOR-BEY MILLER<br />
CONTRACT #: A7595D<br />
TITLE OF PROGRAM: EXPERIENTIAL LEARNING THROUGH THE ARTS: THE<br />
OTHER SIDE OF THE MIRROR: WHILE I WAS<br />
DREAMING<br />
TYPE OF PROGRAM: RESIDENCY<br />
DISTRICT/ SCHOOL:<br />
HAWTHORNE CEDAR KNOLLS/JR. & SENIOR HIGH SC<br />
# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />
# OF STUDENTS: 12 GRADE(S) 7-12<br />
DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE<br />
2/2-3/1/12<br />
NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />
STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 X STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />
ARTIST:<br />
BRENDA CONNOR-BEY MILLER<br />
CONTRACT #: A7595A<br />
TITLE OF PROGRAM: EXPERIENTIAL LEARNING THROUGH THE ARTS: THE<br />
OTHER SIDE OF THE MIRROR: WHILE I WAS<br />
DREAMING<br />
TYPE OF PROGRAM: RESIDENCY<br />
DISTRICT/ SCHOOL:<br />
HAWTHORNE CEDAR KNOLLS/JR. & SENIOR HIGH SC<br />
# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />
# OF STUDENTS: GRADE(S) 7-12<br />
DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE<br />
10/26, 27, 11/2, 3 & 9/11<br />
NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />
STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 X STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />
1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />
1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />
1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />
2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />
3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />
4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />
5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />
6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />
7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />
THIS WAS A GREAT OUTLET FOR THE STUDENTS.<br />
8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />
NONE<br />
9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />
NONE<br />
4<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
1.<br />
2.<br />
3.<br />
4.<br />
5.<br />
6.<br />
STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />
ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />
EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />
ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />
TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />
QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />
THE WRITING ACTIVITIES HAVE BEEN THOUGHT PROVOKING AND<br />
ENGAGING.<br />
8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />
NONE<br />
9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />
NONE<br />
Arts in Education Service - School Evaluations <strong>2011</strong>-<strong>2012</strong><br />
Page 38 of 332
ARTIST: BRIAN CARTER<br />
CONTRACT #: A8584<br />
TITLE OF PROGRAM: CREATING A BAND<br />
TYPE OF PROGRAM: RESIDENCY<br />
DISTRICT/ SCHOOL: NEW ROCHELLE/JEFFERSON ELEM.<br />
# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />
# OF STUDENTS: 30 GRADE(S) 4 & 5<br />
DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 3/7-5/17/12<br />
NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />
STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 X STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />
ARTIST: BRIAN DOHERTY<br />
CONTRACT #: A8537<br />
TITLE OF PROGRAM: DRUMMER FOR THE SHOW - AIDA<br />
TYPE OF PROGRAM: ASSEMBLY<br />
DISTRICT/ SCHOOL: OSSINING/OSSINING HIGH SCHOOL<br />
# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />
# OF STUDENTS: 45 GRADE(S) 9-12<br />
DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 3/19-24/12<br />
NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />
STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />
1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />
1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />
1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />
2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />
3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />
4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />
5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />
6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />
7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? N WHY?<br />
BRIAN WAS LATE ALMOST EVERY SESSION AND THEREFORE<br />
CHILDREN WERE WAITING. HE WAS DISORGANIZED WHEN HE<br />
FINALLY GOT HERE.<br />
8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />
ORGANIZE YOUR PROGRAM AHEAD OF TIME BECAUSE CHILDREN<br />
HAVE A HARD TIME WAITING FOR DIRECTIONS.<br />
9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />
BRIAN IS PASSIONATE ABOUT MUSIC BUT FAILED TO UNDERSTAND<br />
DEVELOPMENTAL GROWTH OF 4TH AND 5TH GRADERS.<br />
5<br />
2<br />
2<br />
3<br />
5<br />
5<br />
1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />
2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />
3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />
4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />
5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />
6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />
7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />
BRIAN'S CONTRIBUTION TO THIS PRODUCTION WAS<br />
EXTRAORDINARY. HIS PLAYING ENHANCED THE MUSICALITY<br />
SIGNIFICANTLY.<br />
8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />
NONE<br />
9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />
IT WAS A PLEASURE WORKING WITH HIM. WE WERE LUCKY TO<br />
HAVE SOMEONE OF HIS CALIBURE WORK ALONG SIDE OUR<br />
STUDENTS.<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
ARTIST: BRIAN KEARINS<br />
CONTRACT #: A8735<br />
TITLE OF PROGRAM: GUITAR PLAYER FOR THE SHOW - XANADU<br />
TYPE OF PROGRAM: ASSEMBLY<br />
DISTRICT/ SCHOOL: CHAPPAQUA/HORACE GREELEY HIGH SCHOOL<br />
# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />
# OF STUDENTS: 200 GRADE(S) 12<br />
DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 4/16-21/12<br />
NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />
STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />
ARTIST: BRIAN PINKNEY<br />
CONTRACT #: A8212<br />
TITLE OF PROGRAM: AUTHOR/ILLUSTRATOR VISIT<br />
TYPE OF PROGRAM: ASSEMBLY<br />
DISTRICT/ SCHOOL: NEW ROCHELLE/WARD ELEM. SCHOOL<br />
# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />
# OF STUDENTS: GRADE(S) K-5<br />
DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 1/9/12<br />
NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />
STANDARD 1 STANDARD 2 STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />
1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />
1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />
1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />
2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />
3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />
4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />
5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />
6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />
7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />
IMPORTANT FOR THE STUDENTS TO SEE HOW ALL THE<br />
COMPONENTS OF A MUSICAL SHOW COME TOGETHER.<br />
8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />
NONE<br />
9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />
TALENTED MUSICIAN AND DEDICATED TO HER CRAFT.<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />
2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />
3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />
4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />
5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />
6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />
7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />
BRIAN WAS A GOOD, STRONG SPEAKER AND INTERACTED WELL<br />
WITH THE STUDENTS.<br />
8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />
NONE<br />
9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />
NONE<br />
4<br />
4<br />
5<br />
4<br />
5<br />
N/<br />
Arts in Education Service - School Evaluations <strong>2011</strong>-<strong>2012</strong><br />
Page 39 of 332
ARTIST:<br />
BRIAN PINKNEY<br />
TITLE OF PROGRAM: AUTHOR/ILLUSTRATOR VISIT<br />
TYPE OF PROGRAM: ASSEMBLY<br />
DISTRICT/ SCHOOL:<br />
CONTRACT #: A8754<br />
SOMERS/SOMERS INTERMEDIATE SCHOOL<br />
# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />
# OF STUDENTS: GRADE(S) 3-5<br />
DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE<br />
4/16/12<br />
NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />
STANDARD 1 STANDARD 2 STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />
1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />
1.<br />
2.<br />
3.<br />
4.<br />
5.<br />
6.<br />
STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />
ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />
EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />
ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />
TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />
QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />
BRIAN HAD A LOT OF ENERGY AND A GREAT PRESENTATION. THE<br />
CHILDREN WERE VERY ENGAGED.<br />
8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />
NONE<br />
9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />
NONE<br />
ARTIST: BRIDGES OF PEACE AND HOPE, INC. CONTRACT #: A8772<br />
TITLE OF PROGRAM: THULA SIZWE TROUP - TRADITIONAL ZULU CONCERT<br />
TYPE OF PROGRAM: ASSEMBLY<br />
DISTRICT/ SCHOOL:<br />
KATONAH/LEWISBORO/ALL ELEM. SCHOOLS<br />
# OF TEACHERS: 4<br />
# OF STUDENTS: 1800 GRADE(S) K-5<br />
DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE<br />
4/16-23/12<br />
NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />
STANDARD 1 STANDARD 2 STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4 X<br />
ARTIST: BRIAN ZANE<br />
CONTRACT #: A8503<br />
TITLE OF PROGRAM: MUSICAL DIRECTOR FOR THE SHOW - YOU'RE A<br />
GOOD MAN CHARLIE BROWN<br />
TYPE OF PROGRAM: RESIDENCY<br />
DISTRICT/ SCHOOL: PEEKSKILL/PEEKSKILL HIGH SCHOOL<br />
# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />
# OF STUDENTS: GRADE(S) 9-12<br />
DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 2/13-4/29/12<br />
NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />
STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 X STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />
1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />
1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />
2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />
3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />
4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />
5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />
6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />
7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />
BRIAN IS AN EXCELLENT MUSIC DIRECTOR.<br />
8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />
NONE<br />
9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />
SAD THAT BRIAN IS MOVING TO CHICAGO BUT HAPPY TO HEAR HE<br />
WILL STILL BE WORKING IN ARTS EDUCATION.<br />
ARTIST: BRITT WINSTON<br />
TITLE OF PROGRAM: COMPUTER GRAPHIC ARTS<br />
TYPE OF PROGRAM: WORKSHOP<br />
DISTRICT/ SCHOOL:<br />
CHAPPAQUA/WESTORCHARD ELEM.<br />
CONTRACT #: A7921<br />
# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />
# OF STUDENTS: 9 GRADE(S) K-2<br />
DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE<br />
1/10-3/6/12<br />
NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />
STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 X STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
N/<br />
N/<br />
1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />
1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />
1.<br />
2.<br />
3.<br />
4.<br />
5.<br />
6.<br />
STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />
ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />
EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />
ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />
TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />
QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />
THIS PERFORMANCE GROUP OF 12 ZULU MUSICIANS SANG,<br />
DANCED, DRUMMED, TOLD STORIES AND SHARED THEIR CULTURE.<br />
IT WAS A VITAL, DYNAMIC AND RIVETING ASSEMBLY. THULA<br />
CONNECTED IN A POWERFUL WAY WITH OUT STUDENTS AND<br />
TRULY SHARED THEIR ARTISTIC CULTURE AND OPENED OUR<br />
HEARTS.<br />
8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />
NONE<br />
9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />
THANK YOU.<br />
1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />
2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />
3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />
4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />
5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />
6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />
7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />
NONE<br />
8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />
NONE<br />
9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />
NONE<br />
4<br />
4<br />
4<br />
4<br />
4<br />
N/<br />
Arts in Education Service - School Evaluations <strong>2011</strong>-<strong>2012</strong><br />
Page 40 of 332
ARTIST: BROMLEY PRODUCTIONS, LLC<br />
CONTRACT #: A7677<br />
TITLE OF PROGRAM: YOJO SHOW - TREAT YOUR BODY RIGHT<br />
TYPE OF PROGRAM: ASSEMBLY<br />
DISTRICT/ SCHOOL: PUTNAM VALLEY/PUTNAM VALLEY ELEM.<br />
# OF TEACHERS: 10 # OF STUDENTS: 500 GRADE(S) K-4<br />
DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 10/5/11<br />
NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />
STANDARD 1 STANDARD 2 STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />
ARTIST: BRYAN COLLIER<br />
CONTRACT #: A8276<br />
TITLE OF PROGRAM: AUTHOR/ILLUSTRATOR VISIT<br />
TYPE OF PROGRAM: RESIDENCY<br />
DISTRICT/ SCHOOL: NEW ROCHELLE/DANIEL WEBSTER ELEM.<br />
# OF TEACHERS: 6<br />
# OF STUDENTS: 120 GRADE(S) 4 & 5<br />
DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 1/6-10/11<br />
NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />
STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 X STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />
1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />
1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />
1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />
2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />
3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />
4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />
5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />
6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />
7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />
GREAT FUN, INTERACTIVE AND ENGAGING. INFORMATION<br />
PRESENTED IN AN EASY WAY FOR ELEMENTARY CHILDREN TO<br />
UNDERSTAND.<br />
8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />
MORE VISUALS OF FOOD GROUPS.<br />
9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />
MAY WORK EVEN BETTER WITH SOMEWHAT SMALLER GROUPS DO<br />
TO ALL THE MOVEMENT AND SPACE NEEDED. BUT THAT WAS<br />
MORE AN ISSUE WITH OUR SPACE THAN THE SHOW ITSELF.<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
N/<br />
1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />
2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />
3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />
4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />
5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />
6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />
7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />
BRYAN IS ENGAGING, CLEAR, PREPARED AND GREAT WITH<br />
STUDENTS. HE HAS AN UP CLOSE, PERSONAL STYLE AND<br />
RELATES TO ALL AGES WITH ENTHUSIASM AND RESPECT.<br />
8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />
NONE<br />
9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />
NONE<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
N/<br />
ARTIST: BRYAN McPARTLAN<br />
CONTRACT #: A8451<br />
TITLE OF PROGRAM: SOUND DESIGNER FOR THE SHOW - GUYS & DOLLS<br />
TYPE OF PROGRAM: RESIDENCY<br />
DISTRICT/ SCHOOL: KATONAH/LEWISBORO/JOHN JAY HIGH SCHOOL<br />
# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />
# OF STUDENTS: 80 GRADE(S) 9-12<br />
DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 3/18-24/12<br />
NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />
STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 X STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />
ARTIST: BUREAU OF LECTURES & CONCERT AR<br />
CONTRACT #: A8382<br />
TITLE OF PROGRAM: AFRICAN DANCE & DRUM TROUPE<br />
TYPE OF PROGRAM: ASSEMBLY<br />
DISTRICT/ SCHOOL: MT.VERNON/LONGFELLOW MIDDLE SCHOOL<br />
# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />
# OF STUDENTS: GRADE(S) 7 & 8<br />
DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 2/16/12<br />
NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />
STANDARD 1 STANDARD 2 STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4 X<br />
1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />
1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />
1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />
2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />
3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />
4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />
5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />
6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />
2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />
3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />
4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />
5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />
6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM?<br />
NONE<br />
Y<br />
WHY?<br />
7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM?<br />
NONE<br />
Y<br />
WHY?<br />
8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />
NONE<br />
9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />
NONE<br />
8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />
NONE<br />
9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />
NONE<br />
Arts in Education Service - School Evaluations <strong>2011</strong>-<strong>2012</strong><br />
Page 41 of 332
ARTIST: BUREAU OF LECTURES & CONCERT AR CONTRACT #: A8588<br />
TITLE OF PROGRAM: AFRICAN DANCE & DRUM TROUPE<br />
TYPE OF PROGRAM: ASSEMBLY<br />
DISTRICT/ SCHOOL:<br />
# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />
TARRYTOWN/W. L. MORSE ELEM.<br />
# OF STUDENTS: 400 GRADE(S) 1 & 2<br />
DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 3/1/12<br />
NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />
STANDARD 1 STANDARD 2 STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4 X<br />
ARTIST: BUREAU OF LECTURES & CONCERT AR<br />
CONTRACT #: A7956<br />
TITLE OF PROGRAM: CHINESE ACROBATS SHOW<br />
TYPE OF PROGRAM: ASSEMBLY<br />
DISTRICT/ SCHOOL: LAKELAND/GEORGE WASHINGTON ELEM.<br />
# OF TEACHERS: 11 # OF STUDENTS: 240 GRADE(S) K-2<br />
DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 3/1/12<br />
NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />
STANDARD 1 STANDARD 2 STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4 X<br />
1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />
1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />
1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />
2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />
3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />
4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />
5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />
6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />
7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? N WHY?<br />
THE PERFORMERS LACKED AUTHENTICITY. THE IMPROV PORTION<br />
WAS INAPPROPRIATE.<br />
8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />
NO EXPLANATION OF THE AFRICAN SYBOLISM. NOT A CULTURAL<br />
PERFORMANCE.<br />
9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />
NONE<br />
4<br />
2<br />
2<br />
3<br />
3<br />
1<br />
1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />
2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />
3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />
4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />
5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />
6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />
7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />
STUDENTS LOVED IT.<br />
8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />
NONE<br />
9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />
NONE<br />
4<br />
5<br />
3<br />
4<br />
5<br />
1<br />
ARTIST: BUREAU OF LECTURES & CONCERT AR<br />
CONTRACT #: A8365<br />
TITLE OF PROGRAM: LEM SHEPPARD - MUSICAL HISTORY SHOW / THE<br />
CIVIL WAR<br />
TYPE OF PROGRAM: ASSEMBLY<br />
DISTRICT/ SCHOOL: BREWSTER/GARDEN STREET ELEM.<br />
# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />
# OF STUDENTS: GRADE(S) K-3<br />
DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 1/24/12<br />
NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />
STANDARD 1 STANDARD 2 STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4 X<br />
ARTIST: BUSHIDO SCHOOL OF KARATE, INC. CONTRACT #: A8269<br />
TITLE OF PROGRAM: DAVID BAEZ - ART & CULTURE OF KARATE /<br />
MOVEMENT<br />
TYPE OF PROGRAM: WORKSHOP<br />
DISTRICT/ SCHOOL:<br />
# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />
NORTH SALEM/PQ ELEM.<br />
# OF STUDENTS: 11 GRADE(S) K-3<br />
DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 1/27-4/13/12<br />
NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />
STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 X STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4 X<br />
1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />
1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />
1.<br />
2.<br />
3.<br />
4.<br />
5.<br />
6.<br />
STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />
ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />
EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />
ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />
TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />
QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
N/<br />
7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />
LEM WAS FANTASTIC. THE STUDENTS AND TEACHERS LOVED TO<br />
HEAR THE STORIES AND SONGS. THE STORIES AND ORIGINS OF<br />
THE SONGS KEPT THE STUDENTS INTERESTED AND ENGAGED.<br />
8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />
NONE<br />
9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />
NONE<br />
1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />
2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />
3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />
4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />
5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />
6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />
7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />
NONE<br />
8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />
NONE<br />
9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />
NONE<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
Arts in Education Service - School Evaluations <strong>2011</strong>-<strong>2012</strong><br />
Page 42 of 332
ARTIST: BUSHIDO SCHOOL OF KARATE, INC. CONTRACT #: A7631<br />
TITLE OF PROGRAM: DAVID BAEZ - ART & CULTURE OF KARATE /<br />
MOVEMENT<br />
TYPE OF PROGRAM: WORKSHOP<br />
DISTRICT/ SCHOOL:<br />
# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />
NORTH SALEM/PQ ELEM.<br />
# OF STUDENTS: GRADE(S) K-3<br />
DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 10/14-12/16/11<br />
NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />
STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 X STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4 X<br />
ARTIST: C.A.S.L.E., INC.<br />
CONTRACT #: A8275<br />
TITLE OF PROGRAM: DEBRA ARONSON - THE ART OF AMERICAN SIGN<br />
LANGUAGE<br />
TYPE OF PROGRAM: WORKSHOP<br />
DISTRICT/ SCHOOL: DOBBS FERRY/SPRINGHURST ELEM.<br />
# OF TEACHERS: 5<br />
# OF STUDENTS: 107 GRADE(S) K<br />
DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 1/26-5/30/12<br />
NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />
STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 X STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4 X<br />
1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />
1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />
1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />
2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />
3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />
4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />
5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />
6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />
7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />
NONE<br />
8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />
NONE<br />
9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />
NONE<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
1.<br />
2.<br />
3.<br />
4.<br />
5.<br />
6.<br />
STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />
ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />
EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />
ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />
TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />
QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />
DEBRA LOVES WHAT SHE TEACHES. SHE IS UPBEAT AND HELPS<br />
THE STUDENTS TO LEARN AND HAVE FUN.<br />
8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />
NONE<br />
9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />
THIS PROGRAM IS WONDERFUL. EVERY YEAR DEBRA BRINGS<br />
MORE BOOKS, GAMES AND IDEAS. THE CHILDREN LOVE SIGN<br />
LANGUAGE.<br />
ARTIST: CALPULLI MEXICAN DANCE COMPANY CONTRACT #: A8304<br />
TITLE OF PROGRAM: NOEMY HERNANDEZ - MEXICAN DANCE & CULTURE<br />
TYPE OF PROGRAM: ASSEMBLY/WORKSHOP<br />
DISTRICT/ SCHOOL: NEW ROCHELLE/DAVIS ELEM. SCHOOL<br />
# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />
# OF STUDENTS: 127 GRADE(S) 3<br />
DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 1/18-3/12/12<br />
NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />
STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 X STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4 X<br />
1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />
ARTIST: CAMILLE LINEN<br />
CONTRACT #: A7535A<br />
TITLE OF PROGRAM: LITERACY THROUGH THE ARTS - COORD. &<br />
CONSULTANT<br />
TYPE OF PROGRAM: RESIDENCY<br />
DISTRICT/ SCHOOL: PORT CHESTER/ALL ELEM. SCHOOLS<br />
# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />
# OF STUDENTS: GRADE(S) K-5<br />
DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE SEPT., <strong>2011</strong>-JUNE, <strong>2012</strong><br />
NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />
STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 X STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4 X<br />
1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />
1.<br />
2.<br />
3.<br />
4.<br />
5.<br />
6.<br />
STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />
ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />
EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />
ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />
TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />
QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />
WE HAD A LIVE MUSIC ASSEMBLY THAT WAS SPECTACULAR. OUR<br />
RESIDENT ARTIST, NOEMY, WAS EXPERIENCED AND VERY WELL<br />
ORGANIZED FROM THE DANCE ROUTINES TO THE COSTUMES.<br />
8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />
NONE<br />
9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />
SHE RELATED TO THE CHILDREN IN A GENTLE MANNER AND<br />
ENCOURAGED THEM TO DO THEIR BEST. THEY LEARNED ABOUT<br />
AREAS OF MEXICO, COSTUMES, CUSTOMS, TRADITIONS AND<br />
LANGUAGE AS WELL AS DANCE - HIGHLY RECOMMEND.<br />
1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />
2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />
3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />
4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />
5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />
6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />
7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />
NONE<br />
8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />
NONE<br />
9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />
NONE<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
Arts in Education Service - School Evaluations <strong>2011</strong>-<strong>2012</strong><br />
Page 43 of 332
ARTIST: CARA FRANZE<br />
CONTRACT #: A8618<br />
TITLE OF PROGRAM: JAZZ DANCING<br />
TYPE OF PROGRAM: WORKSHOP<br />
DISTRICT/ SCHOOL: EASTCHESTER/GREENVALE ELEM.<br />
# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />
# OF STUDENTS: 30 GRADE(S) 4 & 5<br />
DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 3/13-5/15/12<br />
NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />
STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 X STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4 X<br />
ARTIST: CARAMOOR<br />
CONTRACT #: A7831<br />
TITLE OF PROGRAM: IN-SCHOOL ORCHESTRA SEMINAR<br />
TYPE OF PROGRAM: WORKSHOP<br />
DISTRICT/ SCHOOL: BYRAM HILLS/BYRAM HILLS HIGH SCHOOL<br />
# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />
# OF STUDENTS: 94 GRADE(S) 9-12<br />
DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 11/21/11<br />
NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />
STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />
1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />
1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />
1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />
2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />
3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />
4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />
5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />
6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
N/<br />
1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />
2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />
3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />
4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />
5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />
6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM?<br />
ALWAYS A FAVORITE.<br />
Y<br />
WHY?<br />
7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM?<br />
NONE<br />
Y<br />
WHY?<br />
8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />
NONE<br />
9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />
NONE<br />
8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />
NONE<br />
9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />
ANOTHER GREAT PROGRAM. THANKS.<br />
ARTIST: CARAMOOR<br />
CONTRACT #: A7897A<br />
TITLE OF PROGRAM: LINDEN QUARTET CLINIC<br />
TYPE OF PROGRAM: WORKSHOP<br />
DISTRICT/ SCHOOL: KATONAH/LEWISBORO/JOHN JAY MIDDLE SCHOOL<br />
# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />
# OF STUDENTS: 15 GRADE(S) 6-8<br />
DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 11/22/11<br />
NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />
STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />
ARTIST: CARAMOOR<br />
CONTRACT #: A7897B<br />
TITLE OF PROGRAM: LINDEN QUARTET WORKSHOP<br />
TYPE OF PROGRAM: WORKSHOP<br />
DISTRICT/ SCHOOL: KATONAH/LEWISBORO/JOHN JAY MIDDLE SCHOOL<br />
# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />
# OF STUDENTS: 25 GRADE(S) 6-8<br />
DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 3/27/12<br />
NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />
STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />
1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />
1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />
1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />
2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />
3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />
4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />
5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />
6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />
7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />
STUDENTS WERE ENGAGED AND RELATED TO THE MUSIC<br />
PRESENTED.<br />
8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />
KEEP SELECTIONS SHORT.<br />
9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />
THEY ADAPTED TO THE AGE AND EXPERIENCE OF THEIR AUDIENCE.<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />
2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />
3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />
4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />
5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />
6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />
7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />
OMDEM QUARTET WAS VERY ENGAGING, RELAXED AND HAD A<br />
WELL THOUGHT OUT PLAN. THEY WERE FLEXIBLE AND<br />
ACCOMODATING.<br />
8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />
FOR CONCERT AND CONVERATION, SEND OUTLINE OF<br />
PRESENTATION BEFORE VISIT WITH COMPOSERS NAMES AND<br />
SELECTIONS. BIO OF QUARTET WOULD BE HELPFUL. FLYERS 2<br />
WEEKS BEFORE VISIT.<br />
9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />
WE LOOK FORWARD TO THE PRESENTATION EACH YEAR.<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
Arts in Education Service - School Evaluations <strong>2011</strong>-<strong>2012</strong><br />
Page 44 of 332
ARTIST: CARLTON VAN PYRZ<br />
CONTRACT #: A8446<br />
TITLE OF PROGRAM: PICASSO PEOPLE<br />
TYPE OF PROGRAM: ASSEMBLY<br />
DISTRICT/ SCHOOL:<br />
# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />
TARRYTOWN/W. L. MORSE ELEM.<br />
# OF STUDENTS: 200 GRADE(S) 2<br />
DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 2/16/12<br />
NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />
STANDARD 1 STANDARD 2 STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />
ARTIST: CAROL ARRUCCI<br />
CONTRACT #: A7929<br />
TITLE OF PROGRAM: MUSICAL DIRECTOR WINTER SHOW<br />
TYPE OF PROGRAM: RESIDENCY<br />
DISTRICT/ SCHOOL: BRIARCLIFF/BRIARCLIFF HIGH SCHOOL<br />
# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />
# OF STUDENTS: 70 GRADE(S) 9-12<br />
DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 11/2/11-3/11/12<br />
NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />
STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />
1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />
1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />
1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />
2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />
3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />
4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />
5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />
6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />
7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />
STUDENTS WERE COMPLETELY ENGAGED. TEACHERS WERE<br />
EXCITED AND IMPRESSED AS WELL.<br />
8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />
NONE<br />
9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />
ARTIST:<br />
HE ALWAYS MAKES IT SO MUCH FUN FOR THE STUDENTS TO<br />
LEARN THE SIGNIFICANT ASPECTS OF PICASSO'S LIFE AND WORK<br />
CAROL JEAN COLLINS<br />
CONTRACT #: A7704<br />
TITLE OF PROGRAM: COSTUME DESIGNER FOR THE FALL MUSICAL -<br />
ANNIE GET YOUR GUN<br />
TYPE OF PROGRAM: RESIDENCY<br />
DISTRICT/ SCHOOL:<br />
LAKELAND/WALTER PANAS HIGH SCHOOL<br />
# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />
# OF STUDENTS: 100 GRADE(S) 9-12<br />
DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE<br />
10/3-11/19/11<br />
NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />
STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 X STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />
2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />
3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />
4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />
5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />
6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />
7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />
SHE DOES A FIRST RATE JOB.<br />
8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />
SCHEDULE CONFLICTS OCCUR THAT WOULD NEED TO BE<br />
ADDRESSED BEFORE NEXT TIME.<br />
9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />
ARTIST:<br />
I HOPE SHE CONTINUES TO OFFER HER SKILLS TO OUR SCHOOL.<br />
CAROL JEAN COLLINS<br />
CONTRACT #: A8321<br />
TITLE OF PROGRAM: COSTUME DESIGNER FOR THE SPRING MUSICAL -<br />
MY FAIR LADY<br />
TYPE OF PROGRAM: RESIDENCY<br />
DISTRICT/ SCHOOL:<br />
LAKELAND/WALTER PANAS HIGH SCHOOL<br />
# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />
# OF STUDENTS: 200 GRADE(S) 9-12<br />
DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE<br />
3/5-5/5/12<br />
NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />
STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 X STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />
1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />
1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />
2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />
3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />
4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />
5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />
6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />
2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />
3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />
4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />
5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />
6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM?<br />
NONE<br />
Y<br />
WHY?<br />
7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM?<br />
NONE<br />
Y<br />
WHY?<br />
8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />
NONE<br />
9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />
NONE<br />
8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />
NONE<br />
9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />
NONE<br />
Arts in Education Service - School Evaluations <strong>2011</strong>-<strong>2012</strong><br />
Page 45 of 332
ARTIST: CASEY CARLE dba K & C ENTERPRISES<br />
CONTRACT #: A7720<br />
TITLE OF PROGRAM: BUBBLEMANIA COMEDY, ART & SCRIENCE SHOW<br />
TYPE OF PROGRAM: ASSEMBLY<br />
DISTRICT/ SCHOOL:<br />
# OF TEACHERS: 4<br />
CHAPPAQUA/GRAFFLIN ELEM.<br />
# OF STUDENTS: 78 GRADE(S) K<br />
DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 5/11/12<br />
NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />
STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />
ARTIST: CASEY CARLE dba K & C ENTERPRISES CONTRACT #: A8074<br />
TITLE OF PROGRAM: BUBBLEMANIA COMEDY, ART & SCRIENCE SHOW<br />
TYPE OF PROGRAM: ASSEMBLY<br />
DISTRICT/ SCHOOL:<br />
# OF TEACHERS: 3<br />
CARMEL/PATERSON ELEM.<br />
# OF STUDENTS: 625 GRADE(S) K-4<br />
DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 6/14/12<br />
NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />
STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />
1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />
1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />
1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />
2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />
3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />
4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />
5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />
6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />
2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />
3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />
4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />
5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />
6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM?<br />
ENGAGING AND AGE APPROPRIATE.<br />
Y<br />
WHY?<br />
7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM?<br />
EXCELLENT PROGRAM.<br />
Y<br />
WHY?<br />
8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />
NONE<br />
9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />
NONE<br />
8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />
NONE<br />
9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />
GREAT JOB.<br />
ARTIST: CASEY CARLE dba K & C ENTERPRISES CONTRACT #: A8146<br />
TITLE OF PROGRAM: BUBBLEMANIA COMEDY, ART & SCRIENCE SHOW<br />
TYPE OF PROGRAM: WORKSHOP<br />
DISTRICT/ SCHOOL: LAKELAND/BENJAMIN FRANKLIN ELEM.<br />
# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />
# OF STUDENTS: 93 GRADE(S) K<br />
DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 5/15/12<br />
NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />
STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />
ARTIST: CASEY CARLE dba K & C ENTERPRISES CONTRACT #: A7576<br />
TITLE OF PROGRAM: BUBBLEMANIA COMEDY, ART & SCRIENCE SHOW<br />
TYPE OF PROGRAM: ASSEMBLY<br />
DISTRICT/ SCHOOL:<br />
# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />
BYRAM HILLS/COMAN HILL ELEM.<br />
# OF STUDENTS: 200 GRADE(S) 1<br />
DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 3/8/12<br />
NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />
STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />
1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />
1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />
1.<br />
2.<br />
3.<br />
4.<br />
5.<br />
6.<br />
STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />
ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />
EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />
ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />
TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />
QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />
WE FOUND OUR STUDENTS WERE MUCH MORE ON TASK FOR A<br />
MORNING PERFORMANCE. ARTIST AND STUDENTS HAD A GOOD<br />
INTERACTION.<br />
8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />
NONE<br />
9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />
THANK YOU.<br />
1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />
2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />
3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />
4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />
5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />
6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />
7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />
NONE<br />
8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />
NONE<br />
9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />
NONE<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
4<br />
5<br />
4<br />
Arts in Education Service - School Evaluations <strong>2011</strong>-<strong>2012</strong><br />
Page 46 of 332
ARTIST: CASEY CARLE dba K & C ENTERPRISES<br />
CONTRACT #: A7950<br />
TITLE OF PROGRAM: BUBBLEMANIA COMEDY, ART & SCRIENCE SHOW<br />
TYPE OF PROGRAM: ASSEMBLY<br />
DISTRICT/ SCHOOL:<br />
# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />
CHAPPAQUA/GRAFFLIN ELEM.<br />
# OF STUDENTS: 100 GRADE(S) K<br />
DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 5/15/12<br />
NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />
STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />
ARTIST: CASEY CARLE dba K & C ENTERPRISES CONTRACT #: A8789<br />
TITLE OF PROGRAM: BUBBLEMANIA COMEDY, ART & SCRIENCE SHOW<br />
TYPE OF PROGRAM: ASSEMBLY<br />
DISTRICT/ SCHOOL: LAKELAND/THOMAS JEFFERSON ELEM.<br />
# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />
# OF STUDENTS: GRADE(S) K & 1<br />
DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 6/12/12<br />
NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />
STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />
1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />
1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />
1.<br />
2.<br />
3.<br />
4.<br />
5.<br />
6.<br />
STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />
ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />
EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />
ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />
TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />
QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />
THE CHILDREN LOVED BUBBLEMANIA. HE ENGAGED THEM IN HIS<br />
ARTISTRY, HUMOR AND SCIENCE.<br />
8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />
NONE<br />
9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />
ARTIST:<br />
IT WAS GREAT.<br />
CASEY CARLE dba K & C ENTERPRISES<br />
CONTRACT #: A7811<br />
TITLE OF PROGRAM: BUBBLEMANIA COMEDY, ART & SCRIENCE SHOW<br />
TYPE OF PROGRAM: ASSEMBLY<br />
DISTRICT/ SCHOOL:<br />
CHAPPAQUA/WESTORCHARD ELEM.<br />
# OF TEACHERS: 5<br />
# OF STUDENTS: 90 GRADE(S) K<br />
DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE<br />
5/16/12<br />
NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />
STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />
1.<br />
2.<br />
3.<br />
4.<br />
5.<br />
6.<br />
STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />
ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />
EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />
ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />
TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />
QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />
5<br />
2<br />
3<br />
2<br />
3<br />
2<br />
7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />
WE LOVED THE SHOW BUT THE PRESENTOR WAS VERY SARCASTIC.<br />
8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />
WE WOULD LIKE TO KEEP THE SHOW BUT WOULD LIKE TO TRY<br />
ANOTHER PRESENTOR FOR YOUNGER CHILDREN.<br />
9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />
ARTIST:<br />
NONE<br />
CASEY CARLE dba K & C ENTERPRISES<br />
CONTRACT #: A8080<br />
TITLE OF PROGRAM: BUBBLEMANIA COMEDY, ART & SCRIENCE SHOW<br />
TYPE OF PROGRAM: ASSEMBLY<br />
DISTRICT/ SCHOOL:<br />
LAKELAND/LINCOLN-TITUS ELEM.<br />
# OF TEACHERS: 8<br />
# OF STUDENTS: 155 GRADE(S) K & 1<br />
DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE<br />
5/16/12<br />
NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />
STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />
1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />
1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />
1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />
2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />
3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />
4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />
5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />
6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />
2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />
3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />
4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />
5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />
6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM?<br />
TERRIFIC.<br />
8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />
NONE<br />
9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />
NONE<br />
Y<br />
WHY?<br />
7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />
ALL THE STUDENTS WERE THOROUGHLY ENGAGED AND CASEY<br />
HAD GOOD CONTROL OF HIS AUDIENCE.<br />
8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />
NONE<br />
9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />
VERY AGE APPROPRIATE AND INTERACTIVE.<br />
Arts in Education Service - School Evaluations <strong>2011</strong>-<strong>2012</strong><br />
Page 47 of 332
ARTIST: CASEY CARLE dba K & C ENTERPRISES<br />
CONTRACT #: A8542<br />
TITLE OF PROGRAM: BUBBLEMANIA COMEDY, ART & SCRIENCE SHOW<br />
TYPE OF PROGRAM: ASSEMBLY<br />
DISTRICT/ SCHOOL:<br />
# OF TEACHERS: 3<br />
PEEKSKILL/WOODSIDE ELEM.<br />
# OF STUDENTS: 625 GRADE(S) PRE K-1<br />
DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 6/7/12<br />
NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />
STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />
1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />
ARTIST: CASTLE OF DREAMS MUSIC<br />
CONTRACT #: A7833<br />
TITLE OF PROGRAM: ANNIE & THE NATURAL WONDER BAND - RAIN<br />
FOREST CONCERT<br />
TYPE OF PROGRAM: ASSEMBLY<br />
DISTRICT/ SCHOOL: NEW ROCHELLE/WARD ELEM. SCHOOL<br />
# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />
# OF STUDENTS: GRADE(S) K & 1<br />
DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 4/18/12<br />
NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />
STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />
1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />
1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />
2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />
3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />
4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />
5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />
6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />
7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />
WONDERFUL SHOW.<br />
8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />
NONE<br />
9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />
SHOW IS FABULOUS.<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />
2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />
3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />
4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />
5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />
6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />
7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />
THIS WAS AN ENGAGING INTERACTIVE PROGRAM.<br />
8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />
NONE<br />
9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />
WE LOVED LEARNING ABOUT THE RAIN FOREST THROUGH THE<br />
LYRICS OF CATCHY SONGS.<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
ARTIST: CATHERINE (KATIE) SCHMIDT FEDER CONTRACT #: A8194<br />
TITLE OF PROGRAM: COSTUME DESIGNER WORKSHOPS FOR THE SHOW<br />
TYPE OF PROGRAM: RESIDENCY<br />
DISTRICT/ SCHOOL:<br />
# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />
GARRISON/GARRISON SCHOOL<br />
# OF STUDENTS: 40 GRADE(S) 6<br />
DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 12/13/11-1/15/12<br />
NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />
STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 X STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />
ARTIST: CATHERINE (KATIE) SCHMIDT FEDER CONTRACT #: A8003<br />
TITLE OF PROGRAM: COSTUME DESIGNER WORKSHOPS FOR THE SHOW<br />
TYPE OF PROGRAM: RESIDENCY<br />
DISTRICT/ SCHOOL: PEEKSKILL/PEEKSKILL HIGH SCHOOL<br />
# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />
# OF STUDENTS: GRADE(S) 9-12<br />
DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 11/11-12/3/11<br />
NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />
STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 X STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />
1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />
1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />
1.<br />
2.<br />
3.<br />
4.<br />
5.<br />
6.<br />
STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />
ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />
EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />
ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />
TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />
QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />
KATIE DOES A GREAT JOB. SHE IS CONFIDENT AND ORGANIZED.<br />
8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />
MAYBE SOME MATERIALS ON ACTING FOR STUDENTS TO STUDY.<br />
9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />
NONE<br />
1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />
2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />
3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />
4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />
5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />
6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />
7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />
NONE<br />
8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />
NONE<br />
9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />
NONE<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
Arts in Education Service - School Evaluations <strong>2011</strong>-<strong>2012</strong><br />
Page 48 of 332
ARTIST: CATHERINE (KATIE) SCHMIDT FEDER CONTRACT #: A8477<br />
TITLE OF PROGRAM: DRAMA & VOICE COACH FOR THE SHOW<br />
TYPE OF PROGRAM: RESIDENCY<br />
DISTRICT/ SCHOOL:<br />
# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />
GARRISON/GARRISON SCHOOL<br />
# OF STUDENTS: 27 GRADE(S) 8<br />
DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 3/5-4/6/12<br />
NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />
STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 X STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />
ARTIST: CATHERINE (KATIE) SCHMIDT FEDER CONTRACT #: A8708<br />
TITLE OF PROGRAM: PERFORMING STORIES<br />
TYPE OF PROGRAM: WORKSHOP<br />
DISTRICT/ SCHOOL:<br />
# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />
PEEKSKILL/WOODSIDE ELEM.<br />
# OF STUDENTS: 21 GRADE(S) K & 1<br />
DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 5/2-6/8/12<br />
NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />
STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 X STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />
1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />
1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />
1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />
2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />
3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />
4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />
5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />
6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />
7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />
KATIE DOES A GREAT JOB OF ENGAGING STUDENTS AND<br />
MAINTAINS HIGH EXPECTIONS OF WHAT THEY CAN DO WITH<br />
SHAKESPEARE.<br />
8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />
NONE<br />
9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />
NONE<br />
4<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
4<br />
1.<br />
2.<br />
3.<br />
4.<br />
5.<br />
6.<br />
STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />
ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />
EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />
ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />
TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />
QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
N/<br />
7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />
SHE IS A HIGHLY TRAINED AND EXPERIENCED PROFESSIONAL.<br />
HER ORGANIZATIONAL SKILLS MAKE HER CREATIVE PROCESS AND<br />
TEACHING EFFICIENT.<br />
8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />
NONE<br />
9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />
LOOK FORWARD TO HAVE HER AGAIN.<br />
ARTIST: CATHERINE A. KLISE<br />
CONTRACT #: A8487<br />
TITLE OF PROGRAM: AUTHOR VISIT<br />
TYPE OF PROGRAM: ASSEMBLY<br />
DISTRICT/ SCHOOL:<br />
# OF TEACHERS: 2<br />
NORTH SALEM/PQ ELEM.<br />
# OF STUDENTS: GRADE(S) 4<br />
DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 3/2/12<br />
NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />
STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />
ARTIST: CATHERINE COURTER<br />
CONTRACT #: A8695<br />
TITLE OF PROGRAM: ART OF SEWING<br />
TYPE OF PROGRAM: RESIDENCY<br />
DISTRICT/ SCHOOL: KATONAH/LEWISBORO/KATONAH ELEM. SCHOOL<br />
# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />
# OF STUDENTS: 9 GRADE(S) K-2<br />
DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 4/11-5/30/12<br />
NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />
STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 X STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />
1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />
1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />
1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />
2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />
3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />
4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />
5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />
6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
4<br />
1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />
2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />
3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />
4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />
5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />
6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />
4<br />
4<br />
4<br />
4<br />
4<br />
4<br />
7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />
KATE TEACHES THE CHILDREN HER CRAFT IN AN ENGAGING,<br />
ENTHUSIASTIC AND INTERACTIVE MANNER. HER IDEAS AND<br />
SUGGESTIONS WERE INSPIRING TO MANY.<br />
8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />
NONE<br />
9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />
THEY THOROUGHLY ENJOYED THE PRESENTAITON.<br />
7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM?<br />
NONE<br />
8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />
NONE<br />
9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />
NONE<br />
Y<br />
WHY?<br />
Arts in Education Service - School Evaluations <strong>2011</strong>-<strong>2012</strong><br />
Page 49 of 332
ARTIST: CATHERINE GMOSER<br />
CONTRACT #: A8174<br />
TITLE OF PROGRAM: DIRECTOR & PRODUCER OF THE SHOW - ANNIE GET<br />
YOUR GUN<br />
TYPE OF PROGRAM: RESIDENCY<br />
DISTRICT/ SCHOOL:<br />
# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />
TUCKAHOE/TUCKAHOE MS & HS<br />
# OF STUDENTS: GRADE(S) 6-12<br />
DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 10/10/11-3/19/12<br />
NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />
STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 X STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />
1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />
ARTIST: CATHERINE RIEDEL<br />
CONTRACT #: A8620<br />
TITLE OF PROGRAM: CHOREOGRAPHER FOR THE SHOW - ANNIE<br />
TYPE OF PROGRAM: RESIDENCY<br />
DISTRICT/ SCHOOL: CROTON/PIERRE VAN CORT MIDDLE SCHOOL<br />
# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />
# OF STUDENTS: GRADE(S) 5-8<br />
DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 3/16-4/16/12<br />
NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />
STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 X STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />
1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />
1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />
2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />
3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />
4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />
5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />
6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />
7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />
NONE<br />
8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />
NONE<br />
9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />
NONE<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
1.<br />
2.<br />
3.<br />
4.<br />
5.<br />
6.<br />
STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />
ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />
EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />
ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />
TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />
QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />
THE STUDENTS WERE GIVEN AN AMAZING OPPORTUNITY TO<br />
PARTICIPATE IN A VARIETY OF DANCING ROUTINES. THE<br />
STUDENTS FELT GOOD ABOUT THEMSELVES AND ENJOYED THIS<br />
OPPORTUNITY.<br />
8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />
NONE<br />
9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />
NONE<br />
ARTIST: CAVERLY (LEE) E. STRINGER<br />
CONTRACT #: A7738<br />
TITLE OF PROGRAM: AUTHOR VISIT - PERSONAL EXPRESSION &<br />
ADVERSITY<br />
TYPE OF PROGRAM: ASSEMBLY<br />
DISTRICT/ SCHOOL: CHAPPAQUA/BELL MIDDLE SCHOOL<br />
# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />
# OF STUDENTS: 175 GRADE(S) 7<br />
DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 9/28/11<br />
NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />
STANDARD 1 STANDARD 2 STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />
ARTIST: CENTRAL PARK ZOO EDUCATION DEPT.<br />
CONTRACT #: A7941<br />
TITLE OF PROGRAM: WILDLIFE THEATRE PRESENTS: PETUNIA PENGUIN<br />
GOES TO SCHOOL<br />
TYPE OF PROGRAM: ASSEMBLY<br />
DISTRICT/ SCHOOL: HENDRICK HUDSON/BUCHANAN/VERPLANCK ELEM.<br />
# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />
# OF STUDENTS: 43 GRADE(S) K<br />
DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 1/27/12<br />
NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />
STANDARD 1 STANDARD 2 STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />
1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />
1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />
1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />
2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />
3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />
4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />
5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />
6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />
7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />
LEE DOES A FINE JOB.<br />
8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />
NONE<br />
9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />
NONE<br />
5<br />
4<br />
5<br />
5<br />
N/<br />
N/<br />
1.<br />
2.<br />
3.<br />
4.<br />
5.<br />
6.<br />
STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />
ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />
EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />
ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />
TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />
QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />
THE SHOW DID A GREAT JOB SHARING PENGUIN INFO WITH WAYS<br />
THAT WERE VERY CHILDREN FRIENDLY.<br />
8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />
NONE<br />
9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />
NONE<br />
Arts in Education Service - School Evaluations <strong>2011</strong>-<strong>2012</strong><br />
Page 50 of 332
ARTIST: CHALERMPORN CHARPAKORN<br />
CONTRACT #: A7960A<br />
TITLE OF PROGRAM: GUITAR<br />
TYPE OF PROGRAM: WORKSHOP<br />
DISTRICT/ SCHOOL:<br />
# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />
PELHAM/COLONIAL ELEM.<br />
# OF STUDENTS: 9 GRADE(S) K-2<br />
DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 11/28/11-2/13/12<br />
NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />
STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 X STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />
ARTIST: CHALERMPORN CHARPAKORN<br />
CONTRACT #: A7960B<br />
TITLE OF PROGRAM: GUITAR<br />
TYPE OF PROGRAM: WORKSHOP<br />
DISTRICT/ SCHOOL:<br />
# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />
PELHAM/COLONIAL ELEM.<br />
# OF STUDENTS: 6 GRADE(S) 3-5<br />
DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 11/29/11-2/14/12<br />
NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />
STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 X STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />
1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />
1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />
1.<br />
2.<br />
3.<br />
4.<br />
5.<br />
6.<br />
STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />
ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />
EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />
ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />
TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />
QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
N/<br />
N/<br />
7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />
JOE IS PATIENT AND PLEASANT. HE INTRODUCED THE CHILDREN<br />
TO BASIC GUITAR TECHNIQUES AND LEARN BEGINNER MUSIC AND<br />
PLAY SONGS.<br />
8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />
NONE<br />
9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />
NONE<br />
1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />
2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />
3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />
4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />
5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />
6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />
7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />
JOE IS AN EXCELLENT TEACHER. THE MUSIC HE SELECTS<br />
ENGAGES THE CHILDREN AND HE IS VERY PATIENT.<br />
8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />
NONE<br />
9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />
THANKS FOR A GREAT PROGRAM.<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
N/<br />
ARTIST: CHARIOT OF THE SUN<br />
CONTRACT #: A7954<br />
TITLE OF PROGRAM: JEFFREY BENOIT - GREEK MYTHOLOGY<br />
TYPE OF PROGRAM: ASSEMBLY<br />
DISTRICT/ SCHOOL: PUTNAM VALLEY/PUTNAM VALLEY MIDDLE SCHOOL<br />
# OF TEACHERS: 7<br />
# OF STUDENTS: 150 GRADE(S) 6<br />
DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 3/12/12<br />
NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />
STANDARD 1 STANDARD 2 STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4 X<br />
ARTIST: CHARLES R. SMITH, JR.<br />
CONTRACT #: A8489<br />
TITLE OF PROGRAM: AUTHOR VISIT - POETRY PUT TO WORK<br />
TYPE OF PROGRAM: ASSEMBLY<br />
DISTRICT/ SCHOOL:<br />
# OF TEACHERS: 2<br />
NORTH SALEM/PQ ELEM.<br />
# OF STUDENTS: 100 GRADE(S) 3<br />
DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 3/7/12<br />
NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />
STANDARD 1 STANDARD 2 STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />
1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />
1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />
1.<br />
2.<br />
3.<br />
4.<br />
5.<br />
6.<br />
STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />
ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />
EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />
ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />
TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />
QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />
4<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
4<br />
N/<br />
7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />
THIS PROGRAM IS BEAUTIFUL AND REALLY MAKED THE STUDENTS<br />
THINK.<br />
8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />
NONE<br />
9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />
NONE<br />
1.<br />
2.<br />
3.<br />
4.<br />
5.<br />
6.<br />
STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />
ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />
EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />
ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />
TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />
QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />
MR. SMITH WAS FRIENDLY AND ENTERTAINING. HE RELATED WELL<br />
TO THE CHILDREN.<br />
8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />
NONE<br />
9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />
HE MAINTAINED EXCELLENT CONTROL AND WAS THOROUGHLY<br />
ENGAGING.<br />
Arts in Education Service - School Evaluations <strong>2011</strong>-<strong>2012</strong><br />
Page 51 of 332
ARTIST: CHARLES R. SMITH, JR.<br />
CONTRACT #: A8414<br />
TITLE OF PROGRAM: AUTHOR VISIT - POETRY PUT TO WORK<br />
TYPE OF PROGRAM: ASSEMBLY<br />
DISTRICT/ SCHOOL: SOMERS/SOMERS MIDDLE SCHOOL<br />
# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />
# OF STUDENTS: GRADE(S) 6<br />
DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 3/12/12<br />
NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />
STANDARD 1 STANDARD 2 STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />
ARTIST: CHILDREN'S THEATRE CENTER OF NJ d<br />
CONTRACT #: A7993<br />
TITLE OF PROGRAM: ARITHMETICKLES<br />
TYPE OF PROGRAM: ASSEMBLY<br />
DISTRICT/ SCHOOL:<br />
# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />
PELHAM/SIWANOY ELEM.<br />
# OF STUDENTS: 300 GRADE(S) K-5<br />
DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 1/18/12<br />
NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />
STANDARD 1 STANDARD 2 STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />
1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />
1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />
1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />
2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />
3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />
4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />
5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />
6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />
2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />
3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />
4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />
5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />
6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />
4<br />
2<br />
3<br />
3<br />
3<br />
N/<br />
7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />
CHARLES' BOOKS ARE FANTASTIC AND HIS PRESENTATION IS<br />
ENGAGING. HIS VISUALS KEPT STUDENTS INTERESTED. THEY<br />
LOVES HEARING HIM RECITE HIS POEMS.<br />
8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />
NONE<br />
9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />
NONE<br />
7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM?<br />
I FELT THIS WAS MORE SHOW LESS MATH.<br />
8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />
WATCH TONE WITH CHILDREN.<br />
9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />
NONE<br />
N<br />
WHY?<br />
ARTIST: CHILDREN'S THEATRE CENTER OF NJ d<br />
CONTRACT #: A7585<br />
TITLE OF PROGRAM: ARITHMETICKLES<br />
TYPE OF PROGRAM: ASSEMBLY<br />
DISTRICT/ SCHOOL: KATONAH/LEWISBORO/KATONAH ELEM. SCHOOL<br />
# OF TEACHERS: 4<br />
# OF STUDENTS: 170 GRADE(S) 4 & 5<br />
DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 1/10/12<br />
NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />
STANDARD 1 STANDARD 2 STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />
ARTIST: CHILDREN'S THEATRE CENTER OF NJ d<br />
CONTRACT #: A7730<br />
TITLE OF PROGRAM: ARITHMETICKLES<br />
TYPE OF PROGRAM: ASSEMBLY<br />
DISTRICT/ SCHOOL: EASTCHESTER/EASTCHESTER MIDDLE SCHOOL<br />
# OF TEACHERS: 10 # OF STUDENTS: 240 GRADE(S) 6<br />
DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 10/28/11<br />
NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />
STANDARD 1 STANDARD 2 STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />
1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />
1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />
1.<br />
2.<br />
3.<br />
4.<br />
5.<br />
6.<br />
STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />
ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />
EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />
ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />
TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />
QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />
5<br />
4<br />
3<br />
5<br />
5<br />
N/<br />
7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />
VERY ENGAGING. STUDENTS ENJOYED BEING PART OF THE SKITS.<br />
DEMONSTRATED THAT LISTENING AND FOLLOWING PATTERNS<br />
SEQUENCES IS IMPORTANT.<br />
8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />
NONE<br />
9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />
A GREAT RAPPORT WITH STUDENTS. SEEMED VERY EXPERIENCED.<br />
1.<br />
2.<br />
3.<br />
4.<br />
5.<br />
6.<br />
STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />
ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />
EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />
ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />
TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />
QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />
AS USUAL, ARITHMETICKLES PUTS ON A GREAT SHOW. THE<br />
STUDENTS REALLY ENJOY THE SHOW AND LOVE PARTICIPATING IN<br />
IT.<br />
8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />
NONE<br />
9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />
NONE<br />
Arts in Education Service - School Evaluations <strong>2011</strong>-<strong>2012</strong><br />
Page 52 of 332
ARTIST: CHILD'S PLAY TOURING THEATRE CONTRACT #: A8098<br />
TITLE OF PROGRAM: NEW VOICES<br />
TYPE OF PROGRAM: ASSEMBLY<br />
DISTRICT/ SCHOOL: LAKELAND/BENJAMIN FRANKLIN ELEM.<br />
# OF TEACHERS: 2<br />
# OF STUDENTS: 600 GRADE(S) K-5<br />
DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 12/9/11<br />
NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />
STANDARD 1 STANDARD 2 STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />
ARTIST: CHILD'S PLAY TOURING THEATRE CONTRACT #: A7932<br />
TITLE OF PROGRAM: NEW VOICES<br />
TYPE OF PROGRAM: ASSEMBLY<br />
DISTRICT/ SCHOOL: PLEASANTVILLE/BEDFORD ROAD ELEM.<br />
# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />
# OF STUDENTS: 640 GRADE(S) 1-4<br />
DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 3/27/12<br />
NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />
STANDARD 1 STANDARD 2 STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />
1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />
1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />
1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />
2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />
3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />
4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />
5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />
6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />
2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />
3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />
4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />
5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />
6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
N/<br />
7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />
WE LOVE TO SEE STUDENTS GET EXCITED ABOUT WRITING<br />
STORIES THAT MAY BE CHOSEN TO BE PERFORMED.<br />
8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />
NONE<br />
9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />
NONE<br />
7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM?<br />
WONDERFUL.<br />
8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />
NONE<br />
9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />
NONE<br />
Y<br />
WHY?<br />
ARTIST: CHILD'S PLAY TOURING THEATRE CONTRACT #: A7672<br />
TITLE OF PROGRAM: NEW VOICES<br />
TYPE OF PROGRAM: ASSEMBLY<br />
DISTRICT/ SCHOOL:<br />
# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />
BREWSTER/JFK ELEM.<br />
# OF STUDENTS: 500 GRADE(S) K-3<br />
DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 5/31/12<br />
NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />
STANDARD 1 STANDARD 2 STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />
ARTIST: CHILD'S PLAY TOURING THEATRE CONTRACT #: A7812<br />
TITLE OF PROGRAM: NEW VOICES<br />
TYPE OF PROGRAM: ASSEMBLY<br />
DISTRICT/ SCHOOL: CHAPPAQUA/WESTORCHARD ELEM.<br />
# OF TEACHERS: 5<br />
# OF STUDENTS: 515 GRADE(S) K-4<br />
DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 5/29/12<br />
NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />
STANDARD 1 STANDARD 2 STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />
1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />
1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />
1.<br />
2.<br />
3.<br />
4.<br />
5.<br />
6.<br />
STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />
ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />
EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />
ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />
TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />
QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />
GREAT PROGRAM. LOTS OF FUN AND THE CHILDREN REALLY LOVE<br />
IT. AWESOME IN ALL ASPECTS.<br />
8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />
NONE<br />
9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />
NONE<br />
1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />
2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />
3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />
4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />
5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />
6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />
7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />
NONE<br />
8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />
NONE<br />
9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />
NONE<br />
4<br />
4<br />
4<br />
5<br />
4<br />
N/<br />
Arts in Education Service - School Evaluations <strong>2011</strong>-<strong>2012</strong><br />
Page 53 of 332
ARTIST: CHILD'S PLAY TOURING THEATRE CONTRACT #: A8152<br />
TITLE OF PROGRAM: NEW VOICES<br />
TYPE OF PROGRAM: ASSEMBLY<br />
DISTRICT/ SCHOOL: LAKELAND/BENJAMIN FRANKLIN ELEM.<br />
# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />
# OF STUDENTS: GRADE(S) K-5<br />
DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 3/28/12<br />
NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />
STANDARD 1 STANDARD 2 STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />
ARTIST: CHILD'S PLAY TOURING THEATRE CONTRACT #: A8818<br />
TITLE OF PROGRAM: NEW VOICES<br />
TYPE OF PROGRAM: ASSEMBLY<br />
DISTRICT/ SCHOOL: KATONAH/LEWISBORO/LEWISBORO ELEM.<br />
# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />
# OF STUDENTS: 400 GRADE(S) K-5<br />
DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 5/17/12<br />
NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />
STANDARD 1 STANDARD 2 STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />
1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />
1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />
1.<br />
2.<br />
3.<br />
4.<br />
5.<br />
6.<br />
STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />
ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />
EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />
ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />
TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />
QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />
MOTIVATING EXPERIENCE FOR ALL STUDENTS. STUDENTS WERE<br />
ENGAGED AND EXCITED. THE PERFORMERS WERE ENERGETIC<br />
AND FUN. THE BEST PART WAS THE ANTICIPATION OF WHOSE<br />
STORY WOULD BE SELECTED.<br />
8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />
NONE<br />
9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />
WE LOVED THIS PROGRAM.<br />
ARTIST: CHINESE LANGUAGE PROGRAM, INC. CONTRACT #: A7758<br />
TITLE OF PROGRAM: JING QUI LUO - CHINESE CULTURE & ART<br />
TYPE OF PROGRAM: WORKSHOP<br />
DISTRICT/ SCHOOL:<br />
EASTCHESTER/WAVERLY EARLY CHILDHOOD CTR<br />
# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />
# OF STUDENTS: 9 GRADE(S) 1<br />
DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE<br />
10/12/11-1/11/12<br />
NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />
STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 X STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4 X<br />
1.<br />
2.<br />
3.<br />
4.<br />
5.<br />
6.<br />
STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />
ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />
EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />
ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />
TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />
QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />
THE RECOGNITION OF STUDENTS FOR THEIR WRITING, AS WELL AS<br />
THE PERFORMANCE OF 3 STORIES BY OUR STUDENTS, MADE THIS<br />
ASEMBLY SPECIAL.<br />
8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />
NONE<br />
9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />
I CAN'T WAIT TILL NEXT YEAR.<br />
ARTIST: CHLOE PERRET<br />
CONTRACT #: A8722<br />
TITLE OF PROGRAM: CELLO PLAYER FOR THE SHOW - GUYS & DOLLS<br />
TYPE OF PROGRAM: ASSEMBLY<br />
DISTRICT/ SCHOOL:<br />
KATONAH/LEWISBORO/JOHN JAY HIGH SCHOOL<br />
# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />
# OF STUDENTS: 150 GRADE(S) 9-12<br />
DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 3/22-24/12<br />
NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />
STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 STANDARD 3 STANDARD 4<br />
1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />
1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />
1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />
2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />
3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />
4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />
5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />
6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />
7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />
TEACHING CHILDREN ABOUT A NEW CULTURE AND A NEW<br />
LANGUAGE IS HARD, BUT SHE TAUGHT THE CHILDREN IN A FUN<br />
AND ENGAGING WAY. THE CHILDREN LEARNED A LOT.<br />
8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />
NONE<br />
9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />
NONE<br />
4<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />
2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />
3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />
4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />
5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />
6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />
7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />
NONE<br />
8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />
NONE<br />
9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />
NONE<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
Arts in Education Service - School Evaluations <strong>2011</strong>-<strong>2012</strong><br />
Page 54 of 332
ARTIST: CHRIS MELITO<br />
CONTRACT #: A8528<br />
TITLE OF PROGRAM: TRUMPET PLAYER FOR THE SHOW - ONCE UPON A<br />
MATTRESS<br />
TYPE OF PROGRAM: ASSEMBLY<br />
DISTRICT/ SCHOOL:<br />
# OF TEACHERS: 2<br />
SOMERS/SOMERS HIGH SCHOOL<br />
# OF STUDENTS: 50 GRADE(S) 9-12<br />
DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 3/12-18/12<br />
NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />
STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 STANDARD 3 STANDARD 4<br />
1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />
ARTIST: CHRISTA NAPOLITANO<br />
CONTRACT #: A7939<br />
TITLE OF PROGRAM: HIP HOP<br />
TYPE OF PROGRAM: WORKSHOP<br />
DISTRICT/ SCHOOL: EASTCHESTER/EASTCHESTER HIGH SCHOOL<br />
# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />
# OF STUDENTS: GRADE(S) 9-12<br />
DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 11/4/11-1/20/12<br />
NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />
STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 X STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4 X<br />
1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />
1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />
2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />
3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />
4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />
5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />
6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />
7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />
NONE<br />
8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />
NONE<br />
9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />
NONE<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />
2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />
3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />
4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />
5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />
6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />
7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />
NONE<br />
8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />
NONE<br />
9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />
CHRISTA IS WONDERFUL AND THE STUDENTS LOVED HER. SHE IS<br />
ALWAYS CREATIVE AND PRODUCES EXCITING AND GREAT PIECES.<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
ARTIST: CHRISTIAN ANDERSON<br />
CONTRACT #: A8860<br />
TITLE OF PROGRAM: UNDER THE SEA SONGS & DANCES<br />
TYPE OF PROGRAM: ASSEMBLY<br />
DISTRICT/ SCHOOL:<br />
# OF TEACHERS: 3<br />
PELHAM/HUTCHINSON ELEM.<br />
# OF STUDENTS: 340 GRADE(S) K-5<br />
DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 6/5/12<br />
NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />
STANDARD 1 STANDARD 2 STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />
ARTIST: CHRISTINE ECKLER<br />
CONTRACT #: A8284<br />
TITLE OF PROGRAM: DESIGNING SCULPEY JEWELRY<br />
TYPE OF PROGRAM: WORKSHOP<br />
DISTRICT/ SCHOOL: KATONAH/LEWISBORO/KATONAH ELEM. SCHOOL<br />
# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />
# OF STUDENTS: 7 GRADE(S) 3-5<br />
DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 1/23-3/18/12<br />
NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />
STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 X STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />
1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />
1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />
1.<br />
2.<br />
3.<br />
4.<br />
5.<br />
6.<br />
STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />
ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />
EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />
ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />
TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />
QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />
THIS WAS A WONDERFUL EXPERIENCE. THEY PERFORMED 3 MINI<br />
PLAYS. THEY WERE INFORMATIVE AND FUN FOR THE STUDENTS.<br />
8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />
NONE<br />
9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />
WE LOOK FORWARD TO HAVING HIM AGAIN.<br />
1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />
2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />
3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />
4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />
5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />
6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />
7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />
CHRISTINE IS A FAVORITE TEACHER.<br />
8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />
NONE<br />
9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />
NONE<br />
4<br />
4<br />
4<br />
4<br />
4<br />
4<br />
Arts in Education Service - School Evaluations <strong>2011</strong>-<strong>2012</strong><br />
Page 55 of 332
ARTIST: CHRISTINE ECKLER<br />
CONTRACT #: A7555<br />
TITLE OF PROGRAM: DESIGNING SCULPEY JEWELRY<br />
TYPE OF PROGRAM: RESIDENCY<br />
DISTRICT/ SCHOOL: KATONAH/LEWISBORO/KATONAH ELEM. SCHOOL<br />
# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />
# OF STUDENTS: 9 GRADE(S) K-2<br />
DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 9/28-11/30/11<br />
NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />
STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 X STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />
1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />
ARTIST: CHRISTOPHER GRECO<br />
CONTRACT #: A7534<br />
TITLE OF PROGRAM: SOUND DESIGNER FOR THE SHOW - THE DROWSY<br />
CHAPERONE<br />
TYPE OF PROGRAM: RESIDENCY<br />
DISTRICT/ SCHOOL: CHAPPAQUA/HORACE GREELEY HIGH SCHOOL<br />
# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />
# OF STUDENTS: GRADE(S) 9-12<br />
DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 11/11-19/11<br />
NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />
STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 X STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />
1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />
1.<br />
2.<br />
3.<br />
4.<br />
5.<br />
6.<br />
STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />
ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />
EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />
ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />
TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />
QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />
SHE IS WELL LIKED BY THE STUDENTS AND A VALUABLE ARTIST.<br />
8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />
NONE<br />
9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />
NONE<br />
1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />
2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />
3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />
4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />
5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />
6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />
7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />
CHRIS IS A GREAT DESIGNER AND GREAT WITH THE STUDENTS.<br />
8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />
NONE<br />
9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />
I LOOK FORWARD TO HAVING HIM AGAIN.<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
ARTIST: CHRISTOPHER McINERNEY<br />
CONTRACT #: A8838<br />
TITLE OF PROGRAM: LIGHTING DESIGNER FOR SPRING CONCERT<br />
TYPE OF PROGRAM: RESIDENCY<br />
DISTRICT/ SCHOOL: KATONAH/LEWISBORO/JOHN JAY HIGH SCHOOL<br />
# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />
# OF STUDENTS: 450 GRADE(S) 9-12<br />
DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 5/23-6/4/12<br />
NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />
STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 X STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />
ARTIST: CHRISTOPHER McINERNEY<br />
CONTRACT #: A8162<br />
TITLE OF PROGRAM: LIGHTING DESIGNER FOR WINTER CONCERT<br />
TYPE OF PROGRAM: RESIDENCY<br />
DISTRICT/ SCHOOL: KATONAH/LEWISBORO/JOHN JAY HIGH SCHOOL<br />
# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />
# OF STUDENTS: 400 GRADE(S) 9-12<br />
DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 1/9-30/12<br />
NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />
STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 X STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4 X<br />
1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />
1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />
1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />
2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />
3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />
4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />
5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />
6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />
2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />
3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />
4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />
5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />
6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM?<br />
NONE<br />
Y<br />
WHY?<br />
7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM?<br />
NONE<br />
Y<br />
WHY?<br />
8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />
NONE<br />
9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />
NONE<br />
8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />
NONE<br />
9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />
NONE<br />
Arts in Education Service - School Evaluations <strong>2011</strong>-<strong>2012</strong><br />
Page 56 of 332
ARTIST: CHRISTOPHER STELLUTI<br />
CONTRACT #: A8430<br />
TITLE OF PROGRAM: SAX & CLARINET PLAYER FOR THE SHOW - THE<br />
DROWSY CHAPERONE<br />
TYPE OF PROGRAM: ASSEMBLY<br />
DISTRICT/ SCHOOL: KATONAH/LEWISBORO/JOHN JAY MIDDLE SCHOOL<br />
# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />
# OF STUDENTS: 75 GRADE(S) 6-8<br />
DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 3/3-17/12<br />
NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />
STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 STANDARD 3 STANDARD 4<br />
ARTIST: CHRISTOPHER TABORSKY<br />
CONTRACT #: A7934<br />
TITLE OF PROGRAM: TRUMPET PLAYER FOR THE SHOW - ANNIE GET<br />
YOUR GUN<br />
TYPE OF PROGRAM: ASSEMBLY<br />
DISTRICT/ SCHOOL: LAKELAND/WALTER PANAS HIGH SCHOOL<br />
# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />
# OF STUDENTS: 100 GRADE(S) 9-12<br />
DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 11/15-19/11<br />
NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />
STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 STANDARD 3 STANDARD 4<br />
1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />
1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />
1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />
2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />
3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />
4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />
5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />
6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
N/<br />
1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />
2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />
3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />
4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />
5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />
6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM?<br />
THE ORCHESTRA PIT WAS AWESOME.<br />
Y<br />
WHY?<br />
7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM?<br />
NONE<br />
Y<br />
WHY?<br />
8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />
NONE<br />
9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />
NONE<br />
8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />
NONE<br />
9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />
NONE<br />
ARTIST: CHRISTOPHER TABORSKY<br />
CONTRACT #: A8332<br />
TITLE OF PROGRAM: TRUMPET PLAYER FOR THE SHOW - MY FAIR LADY<br />
TYPE OF PROGRAM: ASSEMBLY<br />
DISTRICT/ SCHOOL: LAKELAND/WALTER PANAS HIGH SCHOOL<br />
# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />
# OF STUDENTS: 200 GRADE(S) 9-12<br />
DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 4/30-5/5/12<br />
NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />
STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 STANDARD 3 STANDARD 4<br />
ARTIST: CINDY FINEGAN<br />
CONTRACT #: A7642A<br />
TITLE OF PROGRAM: BROADWAY KIDS ON STAGE<br />
TYPE OF PROGRAM: WORKSHOP<br />
DISTRICT/ SCHOOL:<br />
# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />
PELHAM/SIWANOY ELEM.<br />
# OF STUDENTS: 9 GRADE(S) 3-5<br />
DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 10/4-11/29/11<br />
NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />
STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 X STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />
1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />
1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />
1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />
2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />
3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />
4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />
5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />
6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />
2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />
3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />
4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />
5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />
6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM?<br />
NONE<br />
Y<br />
WHY?<br />
7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM?<br />
THE STUDENTS WERE REALLY INTO IT.<br />
Y<br />
WHY?<br />
8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />
NONE<br />
9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />
NONE<br />
8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />
NONE<br />
9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />
NONE<br />
Arts in Education Service - School Evaluations <strong>2011</strong>-<strong>2012</strong><br />
Page 57 of 332
ARTIST: CINDY FINEGAN<br />
CONTRACT #: A8356B<br />
TITLE OF PROGRAM: BROADWAY KIDS ON STAGE<br />
TYPE OF PROGRAM: WORKSHOP<br />
DISTRICT/ SCHOOL:<br />
# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />
PELHAM/SIWANOY ELEM.<br />
# OF STUDENTS: 8 GRADE(S) 3-5<br />
DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 2/1-4/4/12<br />
NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />
STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 X STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />
ARTIST: CINDY FINEGAN<br />
CONTRACT #: A8356A<br />
TITLE OF PROGRAM: COME ALIVE THEATRE<br />
TYPE OF PROGRAM: WORKSHOP<br />
DISTRICT/ SCHOOL:<br />
# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />
PELHAM/SIWANOY ELEM.<br />
# OF STUDENTS: 9 GRADE(S) 1 & 2<br />
DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 1/30-3/26/12<br />
NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />
STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 X STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />
1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />
1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />
1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />
2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />
3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />
4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />
5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />
6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />
7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />
THE STUDENTS LOVED IT. THEY GOT TO PERFORM IN A SCHOOL<br />
WIDE SHOW AT THE END OF THE CLASS.<br />
8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />
NONE<br />
9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />
NONE<br />
4<br />
4<br />
4<br />
4<br />
4<br />
N/<br />
1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />
2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />
3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />
4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />
5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />
6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />
7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />
NONE<br />
8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />
NONE<br />
9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />
NONE<br />
4<br />
4<br />
4<br />
4<br />
4<br />
4<br />
ARTIST: CINDY FINEGAN<br />
CONTRACT #: A8054A<br />
TITLE OF PROGRAM: CULTURAL HISTORY & TRADITIONAL GAMES<br />
TYPE OF PROGRAM: WORKSHOP<br />
DISTRICT/ SCHOOL:<br />
# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />
PELHAM/PROSPECT HILL ELEM.<br />
# OF STUDENTS: 10 GRADE(S) 2-5<br />
DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 1/10-3/6/12<br />
NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />
STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 X STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4 X<br />
ARTIST: CINDY FINEGAN<br />
CONTRACT #: A7622A<br />
TITLE OF PROGRAM: INTRO TO MUSICAL THEATRE<br />
TYPE OF PROGRAM: WORKSHOP<br />
DISTRICT/ SCHOOL:<br />
# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />
PELHAM/HUTCHINSON ELEM.<br />
# OF STUDENTS: 8 GRADE(S) 1 & 2<br />
DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 10/14-12/9/11<br />
NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />
STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 X STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />
1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />
1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />
1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />
2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />
3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />
4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />
5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />
6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
N/<br />
1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />
2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />
3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />
4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />
5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />
6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM?<br />
NONE<br />
Y<br />
WHY?<br />
7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM?<br />
CINDY IS A PLEASURE TO WORK WITH.<br />
Y<br />
WHY?<br />
8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />
NONE<br />
9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />
NONE<br />
8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />
NONE<br />
9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />
NONE<br />
Arts in Education Service - School Evaluations <strong>2011</strong>-<strong>2012</strong><br />
Page 58 of 332
ARTIST: CINDY FINEGAN<br />
CONTRACT #: A8753<br />
TITLE OF PROGRAM: MUSICAL THEATRE - KIDS ON STAGE<br />
TYPE OF PROGRAM: WORKSHOP<br />
DISTRICT/ SCHOOL:<br />
# OF TEACHERS: 2<br />
PELHAM/SIWANOY ELEM.<br />
# OF STUDENTS: 48 GRADE(S) 1<br />
DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 3/26-5/15/12<br />
NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />
STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 X STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />
ARTIST: CINDY FINEGAN<br />
CONTRACT #: A8054B<br />
TITLE OF PROGRAM: ROCKETTES<br />
TYPE OF PROGRAM: WORKSHOP<br />
DISTRICT/ SCHOOL:<br />
# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />
PELHAM/PROSPECT HILL ELEM.<br />
# OF STUDENTS: 11 GRADE(S) 2-5<br />
DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 1/12-3/8/12<br />
NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />
STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 X STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4 X<br />
1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />
1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />
1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />
2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />
3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />
4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />
5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />
6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />
5<br />
4<br />
4<br />
5<br />
4<br />
5<br />
1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />
2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />
3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />
4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />
5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />
6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
N/<br />
7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM?<br />
NONE<br />
Y<br />
WHY?<br />
7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM?<br />
NONE<br />
Y<br />
WHY?<br />
8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />
NONE<br />
9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />
NONE<br />
8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />
NONE<br />
9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />
NONE<br />
ARTIST: CINDY FINEGAN<br />
CONTRACT #: A7642B<br />
TITLE OF PROGRAM: STORY TIME<br />
TYPE OF PROGRAM: WORKSHOP<br />
DISTRICT/ SCHOOL:<br />
# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />
PELHAM/SIWANOY ELEM.<br />
# OF STUDENTS: 9 GRADE(S) 3-5<br />
DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 10/6-12/1/11<br />
NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />
STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 X STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />
ARTIST: CIRCUS ARTS CAMP<br />
CONTRACT #: A8791<br />
TITLE OF PROGRAM: CHRISTIANE GLOVE - CIRCUS ARTS SKILLS<br />
TYPE OF PROGRAM: ASSEMBLY<br />
DISTRICT/ SCHOOL: NEW ROCHELLE/TRINITY ELEM. SCHOOL<br />
# OF TEACHERS: 5<br />
# OF STUDENTS: 860 GRADE(S) K-5<br />
DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 5/18/12<br />
NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />
STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />
1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />
1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />
1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />
2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />
3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />
4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />
5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />
6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />
7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />
NONE<br />
8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />
NONE<br />
9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />
NONE<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
N/<br />
1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />
2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />
3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />
4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />
5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />
6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />
7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />
CIRCUS ARTS PEOPLE WERE FANTASTIC, PATIENT, SUPPORTIVE<br />
AND EXPLAINED EVERYTHING TO STUDENTS ON THEIR LEVEL.<br />
8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />
NONE<br />
9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />
NONE<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
N/<br />
Arts in Education Service - School Evaluations <strong>2011</strong>-<strong>2012</strong><br />
Page 59 of 332
ARTIST: CIRQUE DU JOUR<br />
CONTRACT #: A8638<br />
TITLE OF PROGRAM: CHRIS ALLISON - CIRCUS SKILLS & SHOW<br />
TYPE OF PROGRAM: ASSEMBLY/WORKSHOP<br />
DISTRICT/ SCHOOL:<br />
# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />
TUCKAHOE/W. E. COTTLE ELEM.<br />
# OF STUDENTS: 74 GRADE(S) K-5<br />
DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 3/29-30/12<br />
NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />
STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 X STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />
ARTIST: CLASS ACT PERFORMING ARTISTS & S CONTRACT #: A8218<br />
TITLE OF PROGRAM: BALLET FOLKLORICO MEXICO<br />
TYPE OF PROGRAM: ASSEMBLY<br />
DISTRICT/ SCHOOL: CHAPPAQUA/SEVEN BRIDGES MIDDLE SCHOOL<br />
# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />
# OF STUDENTS: 150 GRADE(S) 5<br />
DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 5/4/12<br />
NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />
STANDARD 1 STANDARD 2 STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4 X<br />
1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />
1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />
1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />
2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />
3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />
4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />
5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />
6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />
7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />
THE WHOLE SCHOOL LOOKS FORWARD TO THIS SHOW.<br />
8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />
NONE<br />
9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />
GREAT, GREAT SHOW.<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
1.<br />
2.<br />
3.<br />
4.<br />
5.<br />
6.<br />
STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />
ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />
EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />
ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />
TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />
QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />
PERFECT COMBINATION OF DANCE (AMAZING COSTUMES)<br />
LECTURE, Q & A. STUDENTS WERE ENTRANCED AND HAD LOTS OF<br />
QUESTIONS.<br />
8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />
NONE<br />
9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />
NONE<br />
ARTIST: CLASS ACT PERFORMING ARTISTS & S CONTRACT #: A7801<br />
TITLE OF PROGRAM: BALLET FOLKLORICO MEXICO<br />
TYPE OF PROGRAM: ASSEMBLY<br />
DISTRICT/ SCHOOL:<br />
# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />
LAKELAND/VAN CORT ELEM.<br />
# OF STUDENTS: 660 GRADE(S) K-5<br />
DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 5/3/12<br />
NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />
STANDARD 1 STANDARD 2 STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4 X<br />
ARTIST: CLASS ACT PERFORMING ARTISTS & S CONTRACT #: A7741<br />
TITLE OF PROGRAM: BARYNYA RUSSIAN DANCERS<br />
TYPE OF PROGRAM: ASSEMBLY<br />
DISTRICT/ SCHOOL:<br />
# OF TEACHERS: 5<br />
CHAPPAQUA/GRAFFLIN ELEM.<br />
# OF STUDENTS: 110 GRADE(S) K-4<br />
DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 1/13/12<br />
NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />
STANDARD 1 STANDARD 2 STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4 X<br />
1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />
1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />
1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />
2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />
3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />
4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />
5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />
6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />
2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />
3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />
4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />
5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />
6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />
3<br />
4<br />
2<br />
2<br />
1<br />
N/<br />
7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />
THEY WERE AMAZING. THE DANCING AND MUSIC WERE GREAT.<br />
ALL OF OUR STUDENTS WERE ENGAGED THROUGHTOUT AND<br />
LEARNED A LOT ABOUT MEXICIAN CULTURE.<br />
8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />
NONE<br />
9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />
GREAT SHOW.<br />
7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM?<br />
WAS REALLY DIFFICULT TO UNDERSTAND.<br />
8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />
NONE<br />
9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />
NONE<br />
N<br />
WHY?<br />
Arts in Education Service - School Evaluations <strong>2011</strong>-<strong>2012</strong><br />
Page 60 of 332
ARTIST: CLASS ACT PERFORMING ARTISTS & S<br />
CONTRACT #: A7741<br />
TITLE OF PROGRAM: BARYNYA RUSSIAN DANCERS<br />
TYPE OF PROGRAM: ASSEMBLY<br />
DISTRICT/ SCHOOL:<br />
# OF TEACHERS: 5<br />
CHAPPAQUA/GRAFFLIN ELEM.<br />
# OF STUDENTS: 106 GRADE(S) K-4<br />
DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 1/13/12<br />
NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />
STANDARD 1 STANDARD 2 STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4 X<br />
ARTIST: CLASS ACT PERFORMING ARTISTS & S CONTRACT #: A7741<br />
TITLE OF PROGRAM: BARYNYA RUSSIAN DANCERS<br />
TYPE OF PROGRAM: ASSEMBLY<br />
DISTRICT/ SCHOOL:<br />
# OF TEACHERS: 5<br />
CHAPPAQUA/GRAFFLIN ELEM.<br />
# OF STUDENTS: 260 GRADE(S) K-4<br />
DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 1/13/12<br />
NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />
STANDARD 1 STANDARD 2 STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4 X<br />
1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />
1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />
1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />
2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />
3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />
4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />
5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />
6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />
7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />
STUDENTS WERE ACTIVELY ENGAGED.<br />
8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />
IT WAS DIFFICULT TO UNDERSTAND THE SPEAKER. THIS MADE IT<br />
DIFFICULT FOR STUDENTS TO HEAR THE BACKGROUND<br />
INFORMATION FOR EACH DANCE.<br />
9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />
NONE<br />
ARTIST: CLASS ACT PERFORMING ARTISTS & S CONTRACT #: A7741<br />
TITLE OF PROGRAM: BARYNYA RUSSIAN DANCERS<br />
TYPE OF PROGRAM: ASSEMBLY<br />
DISTRICT/ SCHOOL:<br />
CHAPPAQUA/GRAFFLIN ELEM.<br />
# OF TEACHERS: 4<br />
# OF STUDENTS: GRADE(S) K-4<br />
DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE<br />
1/13/12<br />
NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />
STANDARD 1 STANDARD 2 STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4 X<br />
4<br />
4<br />
2<br />
4<br />
2<br />
N/<br />
1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />
2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />
3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />
4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />
5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />
6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />
7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />
NONE<br />
8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />
YOU NEED A BETTER SOUND SYSTEM. IT WAS DIFFICULT TO HEAR.<br />
9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />
THE CHILDREN ENJOYED IT.<br />
ARTIST: CLASS ACT PERFORMING ARTISTS & S CONTRACT #: A7782<br />
TITLE OF PROGRAM: BARYNYA RUSSIAN DANCERS<br />
TYPE OF PROGRAM: ASSEMBLY<br />
DISTRICT/ SCHOOL: CHAPPAQUA/ROARING BROOK ELEM.<br />
# OF TEACHERS: 3<br />
# OF STUDENTS: 450 GRADE(S) K-4<br />
DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 1/13/12<br />
NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />
STANDARD 1 STANDARD 2 STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4 X<br />
5<br />
4<br />
3<br />
4<br />
2<br />
N/<br />
1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />
1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />
1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />
2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />
3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />
4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />
5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />
6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />
7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />
THE ARTISTRY WAS VERY GOOD AND THE STUDENTS LOVED THE<br />
DANCING IN PARTICULAR.<br />
8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />
THE ACOUSTICS WERE NOT VERY GOOD AND IT WAS DIFFICULT TO<br />
UNDERSTAND THE MAIN SPEAKER.<br />
9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />
NONE<br />
4<br />
4<br />
3<br />
2<br />
2<br />
N/<br />
1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />
2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />
3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />
4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />
5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />
6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />
7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? N WHY?<br />
WHILE THE TROOP WAS COMPRISED OF ACCOMPLISHED<br />
MUSICIANS AND THE MUSIC/DANCE WAS ENTERTAINING, THE<br />
CULTURAL MESSAGE WAS NOT CLEARLY DELIVERED.<br />
4<br />
3<br />
2<br />
2<br />
2<br />
N/<br />
8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />
THE PROGRAM WOULD HAVE BENEFITTED FROM A MORE<br />
COMPREHENSIVE SCRIPT ABOUT THE VARIOUS TYPES OF RUSSIAN<br />
DANCE, MUSIC AND CULTURE. I ALSO THINK THEY WOULD APPEAL<br />
TO A WIDER AUDIENCE IF THEY INCLUDED A FEMALE PERFORMER<br />
AS WELL.<br />
9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />
THE CHILDREN REALLY ENJOYED THE DANCE AND MUSIC<br />
ESPECIALLY AT THE END WHEN THEY WERE ASKED TO GET UP<br />
AND DANCE.<br />
Arts in Education Service - School Evaluations <strong>2011</strong>-<strong>2012</strong><br />
Page 61 of 332
ARTIST: CLASS ACT PERFORMING ARTISTS & S<br />
CONTRACT #: A7741<br />
TITLE OF PROGRAM: BARYNYA RUSSIAN DANCERS<br />
TYPE OF PROGRAM: ASSEMBLY<br />
DISTRICT/ SCHOOL:<br />
# OF TEACHERS: 5<br />
CHAPPAQUA/GRAFFLIN ELEM.<br />
# OF STUDENTS: 125 GRADE(S) K-4<br />
DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 1/13/12<br />
NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />
STANDARD 1 STANDARD 2 STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4 X<br />
ARTIST: CLASS ACT PERFORMING ARTISTS & S CONTRACT #: A7699<br />
TITLE OF PROGRAM: THE ROPE WARRIOR<br />
TYPE OF PROGRAM: ASSEMBLY<br />
DISTRICT/ SCHOOL:<br />
# OF TEACHERS: 15<br />
CHAPPAQUA/GRAFFLIN ELEM.<br />
# OF STUDENTS: 100 GRADE(S) K-4<br />
DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 6/18/12<br />
NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />
STANDARD 1 STANDARD 2 STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />
1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />
1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />
1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />
2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />
3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />
4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />
5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />
6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />
2<br />
3<br />
2<br />
2.5<br />
2.5<br />
N/<br />
1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />
2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />
3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />
4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />
5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />
6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />
5<br />
4<br />
3.5<br />
4.7<br />
4.7<br />
N/<br />
7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM?<br />
IT DID NOT HAVE ENOUGH EDUCATIONAL VALUE.<br />
N<br />
WHY?<br />
7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />
CHILDREN LOVED THE PROGRAM AND IT INSPIRED THEM.<br />
8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />
MORE INTERACTION. MORE DANCING. MUSICIANS SHOULD BE<br />
CLOSER TO AUDIENCE. MORE ABOUT RUSSIA.<br />
9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />
THERE'S POTENTIAL HERE IF THERE WAS SOME INFORMATION<br />
ABOUT RUSSIA INCORPORATED INTO PROGRAM AND MORE<br />
DANCING.<br />
8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />
NONE<br />
9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />
PLEASE BRING THEM BACK.<br />
ARTIST: CLAUDE PREECE<br />
CONTRACT #: A8580<br />
TITLE OF PROGRAM: BASS PLAYER FOR THE SHOW - SUGAR<br />
TYPE OF PROGRAM: ASSEMBLY<br />
DISTRICT/ SCHOOL: BRIARCLIFF/BRIARCLIFF HIGH SCHOOL<br />
# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />
# OF STUDENTS: GRADE(S) 9-12<br />
DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 3/4-11/12<br />
NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />
STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />
ARTIST: CLAUDIA STEINBERG<br />
CONTRACT #: A7979<br />
TITLE OF PROGRAM: ART OF MAPMAKING<br />
TYPE OF PROGRAM: RESIDENCY<br />
DISTRICT/ SCHOOL: IRVINGTON/MAIN STREET SCHOOL<br />
# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />
# OF STUDENTS: 130 GRADE(S) 4<br />
DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 11/18/11-1/20/12<br />
NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />
STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 X STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />
1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />
1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />
1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />
2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />
3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />
4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />
5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />
6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />
2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />
3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />
4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />
5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />
6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM?<br />
GREAT SHOW<br />
8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />
NONE<br />
9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />
NONE<br />
Y<br />
WHY?<br />
7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />
WE HAVE PARTICIPATED IN THIS PROGRAM FOR 3 YEARS AND<br />
EACH AND EVERY YEAR WE ARE AMAZED AT THE WORK THE<br />
STUDENTS DO.<br />
8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />
NONE<br />
9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />
THANK YOU AGAIN CLAUDIA.<br />
Arts in Education Service - School Evaluations <strong>2011</strong>-<strong>2012</strong><br />
Page 62 of 332
ARTIST: CLAUDIA STEINBERG<br />
CONTRACT #: A8830<br />
TITLE OF PROGRAM: PUPPETS - THE GREEK GODS<br />
TYPE OF PROGRAM: WORKSHOP<br />
DISTRICT/ SCHOOL: HASTINGS/FARRAGUT MIDDLE SCHOOL<br />
# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />
# OF STUDENTS: 125 GRADE(S) 6<br />
DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 5/3-6/6/12<br />
NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />
STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 X STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4 X<br />
ARTIST: CLAY ART CENTER, INC.<br />
CONTRACT #: A8592<br />
TITLE OF PROGRAM: CHRISTOPHER OSTROWSKI - CLAY CREATIONS<br />
TYPE OF PROGRAM: WORKSHOP<br />
DISTRICT/ SCHOOL: EASTCHESTER/WAVERLY EARLY CHILDHOOD CTR<br />
# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />
# OF STUDENTS: 11 GRADE(S) K<br />
DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 3/9-5/18/12<br />
NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />
STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 X STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />
1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />
1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />
1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />
2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />
3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />
4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />
5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />
6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />
7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />
CLAUDIA WORKS WELL WITH STUDENTS OF ALL AGES. HER<br />
PROGRAMS ARE CHALLENGING AND ENJOYABLE.<br />
8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />
NONE<br />
9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />
NONE<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
1.<br />
2.<br />
3.<br />
4.<br />
5.<br />
6.<br />
STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />
ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />
EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />
ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />
TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />
QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />
THE CHILDREN REALLY LOVED HAVING THEIR HANDS IN CLAY AND<br />
MAKING SOMETHING BEAUTIFUL.<br />
8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />
NONE<br />
9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />
NONE<br />
ARTIST: CLIFFORD WRIGHT-SUNFLOWER dba B CONTRACT #: A7593<br />
TITLE OF PROGRAM: DANCING WITH THE HONEY BEES<br />
TYPE OF PROGRAM: ASSEMBLY<br />
DISTRICT/ SCHOOL: EASTCHESTER/GREENVALE ELEM.<br />
# OF TEACHERS: 6<br />
# OF STUDENTS: 146 GRADE(S) 2<br />
DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 5/30/12<br />
NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />
STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />
ARTIST: CLIFFORD WRIGHT-SUNFLOWER dba B CONTRACT #: A8857<br />
TITLE OF PROGRAM: DANCING WITH THE HONEY BEES<br />
TYPE OF PROGRAM: ASSEMBLY<br />
DISTRICT/ SCHOOL: BREWSTER/GARDEN STREET ELEM.<br />
# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />
# OF STUDENTS: GRADE(S) K-3<br />
DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 5/18/12<br />
NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />
STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />
1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />
1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />
1.<br />
2.<br />
3.<br />
4.<br />
5.<br />
6.<br />
STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />
ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />
EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />
ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />
TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />
QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />
EXPLANATION OF PROCESS IS GREAT. THE STUDENTS LOVED HIM.<br />
8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />
NONE<br />
9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />
NONE<br />
1.<br />
2.<br />
3.<br />
4.<br />
5.<br />
6.<br />
STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />
ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />
EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />
ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />
TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />
QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
N/<br />
7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />
ALWAYS A PLEASURE TO HAVE AT OUR SCHOOL. THE STUDENTS<br />
AND TEACHERS LOVED HIM.<br />
8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />
NONE<br />
9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />
NONE<br />
Arts in Education Service - School Evaluations <strong>2011</strong>-<strong>2012</strong><br />
Page 63 of 332
ARTIST: CLIFTON CHADICK<br />
CONTRACT #: A8765<br />
TITLE OF PROGRAM: SET & PROP DESIGNER FOR THE SHOW - OUR TOWN<br />
TYPE OF PROGRAM: RESIDENCY<br />
DISTRICT/ SCHOOL: CHAPPAQUA/HORACE GREELEY HIGH SCHOOL<br />
# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />
# OF STUDENTS: 25 GRADE(S) 9-12<br />
DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 4/23-5/5/12<br />
NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />
STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 X STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />
ARTIST: CLIFTON CHADICK<br />
CONTRACT #: A8554<br />
TITLE OF PROGRAM: SET & PROP DESIGNER FOR THE SHOW - XANADU<br />
TYPE OF PROGRAM: RESIDENCY<br />
DISTRICT/ SCHOOL: CHAPPAQUA/HORACE GREELEY HIGH SCHOOL<br />
# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />
# OF STUDENTS: 200 GRADE(S) 12<br />
DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 3/9-4/21/12<br />
NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />
STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 X STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />
1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />
1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />
1.<br />
2.<br />
3.<br />
4.<br />
5.<br />
6.<br />
STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />
ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />
EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />
ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />
TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />
QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />
CLIFTON IS A FANTASTIC DESIGNER AND WORKS WELL WITH THE<br />
STUDENTS.<br />
8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />
NONE<br />
9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />
I HOPE TO WORK WITH CLIFTON AGAIN IN THE FUTURE.<br />
1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />
2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />
3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />
4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />
5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />
6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />
7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />
IMPORTANT FOR STUDENTS TO SEE AND LEARN HOW ALL THE<br />
ELEMENTS AND COMPONENTS OF A MUSICAL SHOW COME<br />
TOGETHER.<br />
8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />
NONE<br />
9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />
DAVID IS CREATIVE AND HARDWORKING. HE INSPIRED THE<br />
STUDENTS WITH HIS VISION.<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
ARTIST: CLIFTON CHADICK<br />
CONTRACT #: A8364<br />
TITLE OF PROGRAM: SET DESIGNER FOR THE SHOW - SIX DEGREES OF<br />
SEPARATION<br />
TYPE OF PROGRAM: RESIDENCY<br />
DISTRICT/ SCHOOL:<br />
CHAPPAQUA/HORACE GREELEY HIGH SCHOOL<br />
# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />
# OF STUDENTS: 38 GRADE(S) 9-12<br />
DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE<br />
2/1-3/12/12<br />
NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />
STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 X STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />
1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />
1.<br />
2.<br />
3.<br />
4.<br />
5.<br />
6.<br />
STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />
ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />
EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />
ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />
TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />
QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />
THE SET WAS BEAUTIFUL AND CLIFTON WORKED WELL WITH THE<br />
STUDENTS<br />
8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />
NONE<br />
9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />
I LOOK FORWARDED TO WORKING WITH HIM AGAIN.<br />
ARTIST: COMING TOGETHER FESTIVAL OF DAN CONTRACT #: A7786<br />
TITLE OF PROGRAM: LIVIA VANAVER - WORLD DANCE RESIDENCY<br />
TYPE OF PROGRAM: ASSEMBLY/RESIDENCY<br />
DISTRICT/ SCHOOL:<br />
KATONAH/LEWISBORO/KATONAH ELEM. SCHOOL<br />
# OF TEACHERS: 3<br />
# OF STUDENTS: 61 GRADE(S) 1<br />
DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE<br />
12/12-16/11<br />
NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />
STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 X STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4 X<br />
1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />
1.<br />
2.<br />
3.<br />
4.<br />
5.<br />
6.<br />
STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />
ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />
EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />
ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />
TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />
QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
N/<br />
7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />
WE ALWAYS ENJOY HAVING LIVIA VISIT US. SHE IS A FANTASTIC<br />
TEACHER.<br />
8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />
NONE<br />
9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />
WONDERFUL PROGRAM.<br />
Arts in Education Service - School Evaluations <strong>2011</strong>-<strong>2012</strong><br />
Page 64 of 332
ARTIST: COMMON SENSE COLONIAL<br />
CONTRACT #: A8659<br />
TITLE OF PROGRAM: AMY GARDINER - COLONIAL AMERICAN CULTURE &<br />
CRAFTS<br />
TYPE OF PROGRAM: WORKSHOP<br />
DISTRICT/ SCHOOL:<br />
# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />
YORKTOWN/CROMPOND ELEM.<br />
# OF STUDENTS: 275 GRADE(S) 4<br />
DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 3/30/12<br />
NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />
STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 X STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4 X<br />
ARTIST: COMMON SENSE COLONIAL<br />
CONTRACT #: A7938<br />
TITLE OF PROGRAM: AMY GARDINER - COLONIAL AMERICAN CULTURE &<br />
CRAFTS<br />
TYPE OF PROGRAM: WORKSHOP<br />
DISTRICT/ SCHOOL: NEW ROCHELLE/DAVIS ELEM. SCHOOL<br />
# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />
# OF STUDENTS: 100 GRADE(S) 2<br />
DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 11/16/11<br />
NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />
STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 X STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4 X<br />
1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />
1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />
1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />
2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />
3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />
4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />
5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />
6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />
7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />
HANDS-ON, LIVE EVENT AND EDUCATIONAL. FOLLOWS THE<br />
COMMON CORE STANDARDS.<br />
8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />
NONE<br />
9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />
WONDERFUL PRESENTORS, VERY INFORMATIVE AND INTERACTIVE.<br />
ARTIST: COMPUTER ADVENTURES, LLC CONTRACT #: A8289<br />
TITLE OF PROGRAM: ABIGAEL ESCOBAL - CREATING COMPUTER VIDEO<br />
GAMES<br />
TYPE OF PROGRAM: WORKSHOP<br />
DISTRICT/ SCHOOL:<br />
KATONAH/LEWISBORO/KATONAH ELEM. SCHOOL<br />
# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />
# OF STUDENTS: 12 GRADE(S) 4 & 5<br />
DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE<br />
1/20-3/16/12<br />
NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />
STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 X STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />
2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />
3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />
4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />
5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />
6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />
7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />
IT MAKES COLONIAL LIVING COME ALIVE.<br />
8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />
NONE<br />
9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />
ARTIST:<br />
THE ARTISTS ARE WARM, ENGAGING AND KNOW THEIR HISTORY.<br />
COMPUTER ADVENTURES, LLC<br />
CONTRACT #: A8059<br />
TITLE OF PROGRAM: HELENA FROYTON - STOP MOTION ANIMATED MOVIE<br />
MAKING<br />
TYPE OF PROGRAM: WORKSHOP<br />
DISTRICT/ SCHOOL:<br />
PELHAM/PROSPECT HILL ELEM.<br />
# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />
# OF STUDENTS: 12 GRADE(S) 3-5<br />
DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE<br />
1/12-3/8/12<br />
NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />
STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 X STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />
1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />
1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />
2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />
3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />
4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />
5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />
6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />
2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />
3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />
4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />
5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />
6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
N/<br />
7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />
OUR STUDENTS ALWAYS ENJOY THESE WELL RUN CLASSES.<br />
7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM?<br />
NONE<br />
Y<br />
WHY?<br />
8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />
NONE<br />
9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />
NONE<br />
8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />
NONE<br />
9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />
NONE<br />
Arts in Education Service - School Evaluations <strong>2011</strong>-<strong>2012</strong><br />
Page 65 of 332
ARTIST: COMPUTER ADVENTURES, LLC CONTRACT #: A7963A<br />
TITLE OF PROGRAM: HELENA FROYTON - STOP MOTION ANIMATED MOVIE<br />
MAKING<br />
TYPE OF PROGRAM: WORKSHOP<br />
DISTRICT/ SCHOOL:<br />
# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />
PELHAM/COLONIAL ELEM.<br />
# OF STUDENTS: 12 GRADE(S) 3-5<br />
DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 11/30/11-2/15/12<br />
NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />
STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 X STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />
1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />
ARTIST: COMPUTER ADVENTURES, LLC CONTRACT #: A8724<br />
TITLE OF PROGRAM: PETER GROBE - PHOTO COMIC BOOK CREATIONS<br />
TYPE OF PROGRAM: WORKSHOP<br />
DISTRICT/ SCHOOL: KATONAH/LEWISBORO/KATONAH ELEM. SCHOOL<br />
# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />
# OF STUDENTS: 8 GRADE(S) 3-5<br />
DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 4/9-6/4/12<br />
NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />
STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 X STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />
1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />
1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />
2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />
3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />
4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />
5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />
6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />
7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />
THE CHILDREN WERE VERY ENTHUSIASTIC AND FOCUSED ON<br />
LEARNING HOW TO USE DIGITAL CAMERIAS, HOW TO USE THE<br />
STOP MOTION MOVIE SOFTWARE AND VIDEO EDITING.<br />
8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />
NONE<br />
9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />
THE TEACHER WAS VERY NICE, PLEASANT AND HELPFUL.<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
N/<br />
N/<br />
1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />
2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />
3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />
4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />
5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />
6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />
7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />
NONE<br />
8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />
NONE<br />
9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />
NONE<br />
4<br />
4<br />
4<br />
4<br />
4<br />
4<br />
ARTIST: COMPUTER ADVENTURES, LLC CONTRACT #: A7963B<br />
TITLE OF PROGRAM: PETER GROBE - PHOTO COMIC BOOK CREATIONS<br />
TYPE OF PROGRAM: WORKSHOP<br />
DISTRICT/ SCHOOL:<br />
# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />
PELHAM/COLONIAL ELEM.<br />
# OF STUDENTS: 12 GRADE(S) 3-5<br />
DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 12/2/11-2/10/12<br />
NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />
STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 X STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />
ARTIST: COMPUTER ADVENTURES, LLC CONTRACT #: A8199B<br />
TITLE OF PROGRAM: PETER GROBE - PHOTO COMIC BOOK CREATIONS<br />
TYPE OF PROGRAM: WORKSHOP<br />
DISTRICT/ SCHOOL: CHAPPAQUA/ROARING BROOK ELEM.<br />
# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />
# OF STUDENTS: 9 GRADE(S) 3 & 4<br />
DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 1/11-2/29/12<br />
NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />
STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 X STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />
1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />
1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />
1.<br />
2.<br />
3.<br />
4.<br />
5.<br />
6.<br />
STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />
ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />
EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />
ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />
TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />
QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
N/<br />
N/<br />
7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />
THE CHILDREN ENJOYED THIS CLASS WHILE LEARNING HOW TO<br />
USE THE CAMERA, PHOTO EDITING SOFTWARE AND COMIC<br />
TEMPLATES. THE CHILDREN WERE VERY ANIMATED IN CREATING<br />
AND SHARING THEIR WORK.<br />
8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />
NONE<br />
9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />
THE TEACHER WAS HELPFUL AND PLEASANT.<br />
1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />
2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />
3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />
4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />
5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />
6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />
7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />
GREAT NEW PROGRAM.<br />
8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />
NONE<br />
9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />
NONE<br />
4<br />
4<br />
4<br />
4<br />
4<br />
5<br />
Arts in Education Service - School Evaluations <strong>2011</strong>-<strong>2012</strong><br />
Page 66 of 332
ARTIST: COMPUTER ADVENTURES, LLC CONTRACT #: A8157B<br />
TITLE OF PROGRAM: PETER GROBE - PHOTO COMIC BOOK CREATIONS<br />
TYPE OF PROGRAM: WORKSHOP<br />
DISTRICT/ SCHOOL: CHAPPAQUA/WESTORCHARD ELEM.<br />
# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />
# OF STUDENTS: 9 GRADE(S) 3 & 4<br />
DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 1/12-3/8/12<br />
NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />
STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 X STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />
1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />
ARTIST: COMPUTER ADVENTURES, LLC CONTRACT #: A8034B<br />
TITLE OF PROGRAM: RAYANON SMITH - DESIGNING ANIMATED VIDEO<br />
GAMES<br />
TYPE OF PROGRAM: WORKSHOP<br />
DISTRICT/ SCHOOL:<br />
# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />
CHAPPAQUA/GRAFFLIN ELEM.<br />
# OF STUDENTS: 10 GRADE(S) 4<br />
DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 1/11-3/21/12<br />
NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />
STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 X STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />
1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />
1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />
2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />
3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />
4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />
5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />
6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />
7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />
GREAT CLASS, GREAT ORGANIZATION.<br />
8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />
NONE<br />
9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />
NONE<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
N/<br />
1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />
2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />
3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />
4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />
5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />
6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />
7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />
NONE<br />
8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />
NONE<br />
9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />
NONE<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
4<br />
5<br />
5<br />
ARTIST: COMPUTER ADVENTURES, LLC CONTRACT #: A8157A<br />
TITLE OF PROGRAM: RAYANON SMITH - STOP MOTION ANIMATED MOVIE<br />
MAKING<br />
TYPE OF PROGRAM: WORKSHOP<br />
DISTRICT/ SCHOOL: CHAPPAQUA/WESTORCHARD ELEM.<br />
# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />
# OF STUDENTS: 11 GRADE(S) 3 & 4<br />
DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 1/10-3/6/12<br />
NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />
STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 X STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />
ARTIST: COMPUTER ADVENTURES, LLC CONTRACT #: A8034A<br />
TITLE OF PROGRAM: RAYANON SMITH - STOP MOTION ANIMATED MOVIE<br />
MAKING<br />
TYPE OF PROGRAM: WORKSHOP<br />
DISTRICT/ SCHOOL:<br />
# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />
CHAPPAQUA/GRAFFLIN ELEM.<br />
# OF STUDENTS: 10 GRADE(S) 3 & 4<br />
DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 1/9-3/12/12<br />
NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />
STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 X STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />
1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />
1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />
1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />
2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />
3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />
4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />
5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />
6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
N/<br />
1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />
2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />
3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />
4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />
5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />
6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
4<br />
5<br />
5<br />
7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM?<br />
GREAT CLASS, GREAT ORGANIZATION.<br />
Y<br />
WHY?<br />
7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM?<br />
NONE<br />
Y<br />
WHY?<br />
8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />
NONE<br />
9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />
NONE<br />
8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />
NONE<br />
9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />
NONE<br />
Arts in Education Service - School Evaluations <strong>2011</strong>-<strong>2012</strong><br />
Page 67 of 332
ARTIST: COMPUTER ADVENTURES, LLC CONTRACT #: A8199A<br />
TITLE OF PROGRAM: RAYANON SMITH - STOP MOTION ANIMATED MOVIE<br />
MAKING<br />
TYPE OF PROGRAM: WORKSHOP<br />
DISTRICT/ SCHOOL: CHAPPAQUA/ROARING BROOK ELEM.<br />
# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />
# OF STUDENTS: 12 GRADE(S) 3 & 4<br />
DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 1/9-3/5/12<br />
NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />
STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 X STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />
1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />
ARTIST: COMPUTER ADVENTURES, LLC CONTRACT #: A7552<br />
TITLE OF PROGRAM: VIVIAN TAI - STOP MOTION ANIMATED MOVIE MAKING<br />
TYPE OF PROGRAM: WORKSHOP<br />
DISTRICT/ SCHOOL: KATONAH/LEWISBORO/KATONAH ELEM. SCHOOL<br />
# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />
# OF STUDENTS: GRADE(S) 3-5<br />
DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 9/27-11/15/11<br />
NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />
STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 X STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />
1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />
1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />
2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />
3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />
4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />
5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />
6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />
7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />
PARENTS LOVED THE FINAL PRODUCT.<br />
8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />
NONE<br />
9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />
NONE<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
4<br />
5<br />
1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />
2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />
3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />
4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />
5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />
6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />
7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />
GREAT CLASSES. VERY WELL RECEIVED.<br />
8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />
NONE<br />
9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />
NONE<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
ARTIST: COMPUTER ADVENTURES, LLC CONTRACT #: A7503<br />
TITLE OF PROGRAM: VIVIAN TAI - STOP MOTION ANIMATED MOVIE MAKING<br />
TYPE OF PROGRAM: WORKSHOP<br />
DISTRICT/ SCHOOL: KATONAH/LEWISBORO/INCREASE MILLER ELEM.<br />
# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />
# OF STUDENTS: 7 GRADE(S) 3-5<br />
DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 10/3-11/28/11<br />
NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />
STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 X STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />
ARTIST: CONRAD R. WOYCE - BOB CONRAD PR CONTRACT #: A7970<br />
TITLE OF PROGRAM: MAGIC OF HEALTH & FITNESS SHOW<br />
TYPE OF PROGRAM: ASSEMBLY<br />
DISTRICT/ SCHOOL:<br />
# OF TEACHERS: 7<br />
CARMEL/PATERSON ELEM.<br />
# OF STUDENTS: 625 GRADE(S) K-4<br />
DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 6/15/12<br />
NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />
STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />
1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />
1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />
1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />
2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />
3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />
4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />
5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />
6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />
2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />
3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />
4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />
5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />
6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />
3<br />
3<br />
3<br />
3<br />
3<br />
3<br />
7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM?<br />
WE ENJOY ALL THE CLASSES.<br />
Y<br />
WHY?<br />
7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM?<br />
NONE<br />
Y<br />
WHY?<br />
8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />
NONE<br />
9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />
NONE<br />
8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />
SHOULD BE UPDATED. MORE INTERACTION, MAGIC AND MUSIC.<br />
9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />
NONE<br />
Arts in Education Service - School Evaluations <strong>2011</strong>-<strong>2012</strong><br />
Page 68 of 332
ARTIST: CONSTANCE S. PRENER<br />
CONTRACT #: A8423<br />
TITLE OF PROGRAM: ACCOMPANIST FOR THE SHOW - BEAUTY AND THE<br />
BEAST<br />
TYPE OF PROGRAM: ASSEMBLY<br />
DISTRICT/ SCHOOL: PLEASANTVILLE/PLEASANTVILLE MS & HS<br />
# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />
# OF STUDENTS: 100 GRADE(S) 6-12<br />
DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 2/3-3/8/12<br />
NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />
STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />
1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />
1.<br />
2.<br />
3.<br />
4.<br />
5.<br />
6.<br />
STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />
ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />
EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />
ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />
TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />
QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
N/<br />
7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />
WORKING WITH A REHEARSAL ACCOMPANIST MADE THE MUSICAL<br />
QUALITY IMPROVE AS WELL AS THE EFFICIENCY OF RUNNING<br />
CHOREOGRAPHY REHEARSALS.<br />
8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />
NONE<br />
9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />
CONNIE WORKS WONDERFULLY WITH THE STUDENTS,<br />
ENCOURAGING THEM TO HAVE MORE CONFIDENCE, AS WELL AS<br />
TEACHING MUSICIANSHIP SKILLS.<br />
ARTIST: CREATIVE CURIOSITY, INC.<br />
CONTRACT #: A8673<br />
TITLE OF PROGRAM: KIM McCORMACK - BUILDING A COMMUNITY MURAL<br />
TYPE OF PROGRAM: RESIDENCY<br />
DISTRICT/ SCHOOL:<br />
# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />
WHITE PLAINS/RIDGEWAY ELEM.<br />
# OF STUDENTS: 700 GRADE(S) K-5<br />
DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 3/27-6/13/12<br />
NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />
STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 X STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />
ARTIST: COPLAND HOUSE<br />
CONTRACT #: A7775<br />
TITLE OF PROGRAM: MUSIC WORKSHOPS<br />
TYPE OF PROGRAM: RESIDENCY<br />
DISTRICT/ SCHOOL: LAKELAND/LAKELAND HIGH SCHOOL<br />
# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />
# OF STUDENTS: 65 GRADE(S) 10-12<br />
DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 10/19, 27 & 11/11/11<br />
NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />
STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 X STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />
1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />
1.<br />
2.<br />
3.<br />
4.<br />
5.<br />
6.<br />
STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />
ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />
EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />
ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />
TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />
QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />
THIS PROGRAM BRINGS IN PROFESSIONAL MUSICIANS OF THE<br />
HIGHEST CALIBER WHO CAN FOCUS ON THE BEST APPROACHES<br />
TO THE MUSIC. THIS ONE-ON-ONE SPECIFICITY HELPS THE<br />
STUDENTS REALIZE HOW BETTER TO UNDERSTAND, PERFORM AND<br />
EXECUTE MUSIC.<br />
8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />
NONE<br />
9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />
TO HAVE THESE GREAT ARTISTS COME MORE FREQUENTLY TO<br />
SCHOOLS CREATES ONE OF THE RICHEST ENVIRONMENTS<br />
STUDENTS WILL EVER EXPERIENCE.<br />
ARTIST: CREATIVE CURIOSITY, INC.<br />
CONTRACT #: A8241<br />
TITLE OF PROGRAM: KIM McCORMACK - BUILDING A COMMUNITY MURAL<br />
TYPE OF PROGRAM: RESIDENCY<br />
DISTRICT/ SCHOOL:<br />
PELHAM/SIWANOY ELEM.<br />
# OF TEACHERS: 2<br />
# OF STUDENTS: 48 GRADE(S) 2<br />
DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE<br />
12/15-22/11<br />
NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />
STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 X STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />
1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />
1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />
1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />
2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />
3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />
4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />
5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />
6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />
7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />
KIM'S TECHNIQUES WERE FANTASTIC AND SHE IS EXTREMELY<br />
CREATIVE AND A GREAT PROBLEM SOLVER.<br />
8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />
NONE<br />
9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />
SHE PUT TOGETHER A MURAL THAT WE WILL ENJOY FOR MANY<br />
YEARS.<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />
2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />
3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />
4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />
5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />
6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />
7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />
CHILDREN WERE ENCOURAGED TO BE CREATIVE AND<br />
COOPERATIVE WITH EACH OTHER. STUDENTS WERE EXTREMELY<br />
ENGAGED DURING WORK PERIOD.<br />
8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />
HAVE AN ACTIVITY PLANNED FOR THE FINAL DAY WHEN YOU WERE<br />
ASSEMBLING THE PROJECTS AND SPRUCE UP DAY 1 A BIT.<br />
9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />
WONDERFUL ACTIVITY.<br />
4<br />
5<br />
5<br />
4<br />
4<br />
4<br />
Arts in Education Service - School Evaluations <strong>2011</strong>-<strong>2012</strong><br />
Page 69 of 332
ARTIST: CREATIVE CURIOSITY, INC.<br />
CONTRACT #: A8386<br />
TITLE OF PROGRAM: KIM McCORMACK - BUILDING A COMMUNITY MURAL<br />
TYPE OF PROGRAM: RESIDENCY<br />
DISTRICT/ SCHOOL: KATONAH/LEWISBORO/MEADOWPOND ELEM.<br />
# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />
# OF STUDENTS: GRADE(S) 1<br />
DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 3/12-16/12<br />
NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />
STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 X STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />
ARTIST: CREATIVE CURIOSITY, INC.<br />
CONTRACT #: A8339<br />
TITLE OF PROGRAM: KIM McCORMACK - SHADOW PUPPETS<br />
TYPE OF PROGRAM: RESIDENCY<br />
DISTRICT/ SCHOOL:<br />
# OF TEACHERS: 5<br />
CHAPPAQUA/GRAFFLIN ELEM.<br />
# OF STUDENTS: 8 GRADE(S) 1<br />
DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 1/11-13/12<br />
NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />
STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 X STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4 X<br />
1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />
1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />
1.<br />
2.<br />
3.<br />
4.<br />
5.<br />
6.<br />
STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />
ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />
EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />
ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />
TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />
QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />
KIM IS AMAZING AND SHOULD BE IN OR AT EVERY SCHOOL. THE<br />
ART AND CONNECTION TO THE CURRICULUM ENHANCES THE<br />
LEARNING OF EVERY STUDENT. THE HANDS ON LEARNING BRINGS<br />
OUT HIGH LEVEL THINKING SKILLS.<br />
8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />
NONE<br />
9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />
NONE<br />
1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />
2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />
3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />
4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />
5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />
6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />
7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />
THE STUDENTS LEARNED SO MUCH FROM KIM AND REALLY<br />
ENJOYED MAKING THE PUPPETS.<br />
8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />
NONE<br />
9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />
NONE<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
ARTIST: CYBER DISCOVERIS 2<br />
CONTRACT #: A7628<br />
TITLE OF PROGRAM: ERIC KANTOR - CREATING A TECHNO MOVIE<br />
TYPE OF PROGRAM: WORKSHOP<br />
DISTRICT/ SCHOOL:<br />
# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />
NORTH SALEM/PQ ELEM.<br />
# OF STUDENTS: 9 GRADE(S) 2-5<br />
DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 10/6-12/15/11<br />
NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />
STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 X STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />
ARTIST: CYNTHIA EXTANCE<br />
CONTRACT #: A7624B<br />
TITLE OF PROGRAM: BEADING BONANZA<br />
TYPE OF PROGRAM: WORKSHOP<br />
DISTRICT/ SCHOOL:<br />
# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />
NORTH SALEM/PQ ELEM.<br />
# OF STUDENTS: GRADE(S) 3-5<br />
DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 10/5-11/30/11<br />
NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />
STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 X STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />
1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />
1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />
1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />
2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />
3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />
4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />
5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />
6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />
2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />
3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />
4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />
5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />
6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM?<br />
NONE<br />
Y<br />
WHY?<br />
7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM?<br />
NONE<br />
Y<br />
WHY?<br />
8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />
NONE<br />
9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />
NONE<br />
8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />
NONE<br />
9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />
NONE<br />
Arts in Education Service - School Evaluations <strong>2011</strong>-<strong>2012</strong><br />
Page 70 of 332
ARTIST: CYNTHIA EXTANCE<br />
CONTRACT #: A8265B<br />
TITLE OF PROGRAM: BEADING BONANZA<br />
TYPE OF PROGRAM: WORKSHOP<br />
DISTRICT/ SCHOOL:<br />
# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />
NORTH SALEM/PQ ELEM.<br />
# OF STUDENTS: 17 GRADE(S) 3-5<br />
DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 1/25-3/21/12<br />
NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />
STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 X STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />
ARTIST: CYNTHIA EXTANCE<br />
CONTRACT #: A8742B<br />
TITLE OF PROGRAM: BEADING BONANZA<br />
TYPE OF PROGRAM: WORKSHOP<br />
DISTRICT/ SCHOOL:<br />
# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />
NORTH SALEM/PQ ELEM.<br />
# OF STUDENTS: 9 GRADE(S) 3-5<br />
DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 4/18-6/6/12<br />
NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />
STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 X STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />
1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />
1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />
1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />
2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />
3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />
4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />
5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />
6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />
2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />
3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />
4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />
5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />
6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM?<br />
NONE<br />
Y<br />
WHY?<br />
7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM?<br />
NONE<br />
Y<br />
WHY?<br />
8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />
NONE<br />
9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />
NONE<br />
8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />
NONE<br />
9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />
NONE<br />
ARTIST: CYNTHIA EXTANCE<br />
CONTRACT #: A7624A<br />
TITLE OF PROGRAM: BEYOND BEADING<br />
TYPE OF PROGRAM: WORKSHOP<br />
DISTRICT/ SCHOOL:<br />
# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />
NORTH SALEM/PQ ELEM.<br />
# OF STUDENTS: GRADE(S) 3-5<br />
DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 10/3-11/28/11<br />
NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />
STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 X STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />
ARTIST: CYNTHIA EXTANCE<br />
CONTRACT #: A8742A<br />
TITLE OF PROGRAM: BEYOND BEADING<br />
TYPE OF PROGRAM: WORKSHOP<br />
DISTRICT/ SCHOOL:<br />
# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />
NORTH SALEM/PQ ELEM.<br />
# OF STUDENTS: 9 GRADE(S) 3-5<br />
DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 4/16-6/11/12<br />
NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />
STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 X STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />
1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />
1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />
1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />
2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />
3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />
4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />
5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />
6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />
2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />
3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />
4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />
5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />
6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM?<br />
NONE<br />
Y<br />
WHY?<br />
7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM?<br />
NONE<br />
Y<br />
WHY?<br />
8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />
NONE<br />
9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />
NONE<br />
8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />
NONE<br />
9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />
NONE<br />
Arts in Education Service - School Evaluations <strong>2011</strong>-<strong>2012</strong><br />
Page 71 of 332
ARTIST: CYNTHIA EXTANCE<br />
CONTRACT #: A8265A<br />
TITLE OF PROGRAM: BEYOND BEADING<br />
TYPE OF PROGRAM: WORKSHOP<br />
DISTRICT/ SCHOOL:<br />
# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />
NORTH SALEM/PQ ELEM.<br />
# OF STUDENTS: 17 GRADE(S) 3-5<br />
DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 1/23-3/19/12<br />
NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />
STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 X STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />
ARTIST: CYNTHIA GREEN-BIRO<br />
CONTRACT #: A8692A<br />
TITLE OF PROGRAM: MUSICAL THEATER - A TASTE OF BROADWAY<br />
TYPE OF PROGRAM: WORKSHOP<br />
DISTRICT/ SCHOOL: KATONAH/LEWISBORO/KATONAH ELEM. SCHOOL<br />
# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />
# OF STUDENTS: 9 GRADE(S) K-2<br />
DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 4/9-6/4/12<br />
NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />
STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />
1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />
1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />
1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />
2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />
3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />
4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />
5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />
6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />
2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />
3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />
4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />
5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />
6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />
3<br />
3<br />
3<br />
3<br />
3<br />
3<br />
7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM?<br />
NONE<br />
8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />
NONE<br />
9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />
NONE<br />
Y<br />
WHY?<br />
7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />
VERY GOOD INSTRUCTOR AND THE STUDENTS ENJOYED THE<br />
CLASS.<br />
8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />
NONE<br />
9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />
NONE<br />
ARTIST: CYNTHIA GREEN-BIRO<br />
CONTRACT #: A8287<br />
TITLE OF PROGRAM: MUSICAL THEATER - A TASTE OF BROADWAY<br />
TYPE OF PROGRAM: WORKSHOP<br />
DISTRICT/ SCHOOL: KATONAH/LEWISBORO/KATONAH ELEM. SCHOOL<br />
# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />
# OF STUDENTS: 11 GRADE(S) K-2<br />
DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 1/19-3/15/12<br />
NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />
STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />
ARTIST: CYNTHIA GREEN-BIRO<br />
CONTRACT #: A7556<br />
TITLE OF PROGRAM: MUSICAL THEATRE - A TASTE OF BROADWAY<br />
TYPE OF PROGRAM: WORKSHOP<br />
DISTRICT/ SCHOOL: KATONAH/LEWISBORO/KATONAH ELEM. SCHOOL<br />
# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />
# OF STUDENTS: 8 GRADE(S) K-2<br />
DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 9/23-12/16/11<br />
NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />
STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />
1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />
1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />
1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />
2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />
3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />
4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />
5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />
6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />
7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />
NONE<br />
8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />
NONE<br />
9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />
NONE<br />
3<br />
3<br />
3<br />
3<br />
3<br />
3<br />
1.<br />
2.<br />
3.<br />
4.<br />
5.<br />
6.<br />
STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />
ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />
EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />
ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />
TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />
QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />
4<br />
4<br />
4<br />
4<br />
4<br />
4<br />
7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />
CYNTHIA IS A PROFESSIONAL AND WELL ORGANIZED<br />
INSTRUCTOR. SHE IS WELL LIKED BY THE STUDENTS AND GIVES<br />
VERY GOOD CLASSES.<br />
8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />
NONE<br />
9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />
NONE<br />
Arts in Education Service - School Evaluations <strong>2011</strong>-<strong>2012</strong><br />
Page 72 of 332
ARTIST: CYNTHIA GREEN-BIRO<br />
CONTRACT #: A7556B<br />
TITLE OF PROGRAM: MUSICAL THEATRE - HIP HOP MUSIC & DANCING<br />
TYPE OF PROGRAM: WORKSHOP<br />
DISTRICT/ SCHOOL: KATONAH/LEWISBORO/KATONAH ELEM. SCHOOL<br />
# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />
# OF STUDENTS: 9 GRADE(S) K-2<br />
DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 9/28-11/16/11<br />
NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />
STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />
ARTIST: D. J. GREENBURG, FLP (DAN GREENBU CONTRACT #: A8632<br />
TITLE OF PROGRAM: AUTHOR VISIT<br />
TYPE OF PROGRAM: ASSEMBLY<br />
DISTRICT/ SCHOOL: BREWSTER/GARDEN STREET ELEM.<br />
# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />
# OF STUDENTS: GRADE(S) 3<br />
DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 3/16/12<br />
NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />
STANDARD 1 STANDARD 2 STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />
1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />
1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />
1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />
2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />
3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />
4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />
5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />
6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />
7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />
SHE IS A VERY GOOD ARTIST/INSTRUCTOR. WELL LIKED AND A<br />
GOOD CLASS.<br />
8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />
NONE<br />
9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />
NONE<br />
4<br />
4<br />
4<br />
4<br />
4<br />
4<br />
1.<br />
2.<br />
3.<br />
4.<br />
5.<br />
6.<br />
STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />
ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />
EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />
ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />
TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />
QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
4<br />
5<br />
7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />
DAN ENTERTAINED CHILDREN WITH WONDERFUL STORIES OF HIS<br />
TRAVELS.<br />
8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />
USE MORE TECHNOLOGY SUCH AS A POWERPOINT PRESENTATION.<br />
9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />
HAPPY TO HAVE DAN VISIT US.<br />
ARTIST: D. J. GREENBURG, FLP (DAN GREENBU CONTRACT #: A8209<br />
TITLE OF PROGRAM: AUTHOR VISIT<br />
TYPE OF PROGRAM: ASSEMBLY<br />
DISTRICT/ SCHOOL: CHAPPAQUA/ROARING BROOK ELEM.<br />
# OF TEACHERS: 4<br />
# OF STUDENTS: 300 GRADE(S) 2-4<br />
DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 3/19/12<br />
NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />
STANDARD 1 STANDARD 2 STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />
ARTIST: D. J. GREENBURG, FLP (DAN GREENBU CONTRACT #: A7785<br />
TITLE OF PROGRAM: AUTHOR VISIT<br />
TYPE OF PROGRAM: ASSEMBLY<br />
DISTRICT/ SCHOOL: HENDRICK HUDSON/FURNACE WOODS ELEM.<br />
# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />
# OF STUDENTS: 65 GRADE(S) 3<br />
DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 10/6/11<br />
NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />
STANDARD 1 STANDARD 2 STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />
1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />
1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />
1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />
2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />
3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />
4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />
5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />
6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />
4<br />
2<br />
2<br />
3<br />
2<br />
N/<br />
1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />
2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />
3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />
4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />
5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />
6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />
5<br />
5<br />
4<br />
4<br />
5<br />
N/<br />
7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? N WHY?<br />
DIDN'T DISCUSS THE WRITING PROCESS. SOME STORIES WERE<br />
INAPPROPRIATE FOR ELEMENTARY STUDENTS (BURNING<br />
BUILDINGS, HOMICIDE, OUT OF BODY EXPERIENCE).<br />
8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />
INCORPORATE LESSONS FOR YOUNG STUDENT WRITERS.<br />
VISUALSOF WRITING PROCESS AND YOUR WRITER LIFE.<br />
9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />
NONE<br />
7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />
THE TONE AND CONTENT OF SOME OF HIS BOOKS MIGHT BE<br />
BETTER FOR OLDER STUDENTS, BUT ZACK FILES ARE VERY<br />
APPROPRIATE FOR 3RD GRADE.<br />
8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />
NONE<br />
9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />
NONE<br />
Arts in Education Service - School Evaluations <strong>2011</strong>-<strong>2012</strong><br />
Page 73 of 332
ARTIST: D. J. GREENBURG, FLP (DAN GREENBU CONTRACT #: A8672<br />
TITLE OF PROGRAM: AUTHOR VISIT<br />
TYPE OF PROGRAM: ASSEMBLY<br />
DISTRICT/ SCHOOL: PUTNAM VALLEY/PUTNAM VALLEY ELEM.<br />
# OF TEACHERS: 7<br />
# OF STUDENTS: 200 GRADE(S) 3 & 4<br />
DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 3/26/12<br />
NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />
STANDARD 1 STANDARD 2 STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />
ARTIST: D. J. GREENBURG, FLP (DAN GREENBU CONTRACT #: A8632<br />
TITLE OF PROGRAM: AUTHOR VISIT<br />
TYPE OF PROGRAM: ASSEMBLY<br />
DISTRICT/ SCHOOL:<br />
# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />
BREWSTER/JFK ELEM.<br />
# OF STUDENTS: 125 GRADE(S) 3<br />
DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 3/12/12<br />
NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />
STANDARD 1 STANDARD 2 STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />
1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />
1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />
1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />
2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />
3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />
4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />
5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />
6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />
7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />
DAN'S EXPERIENCES WERE VERY INTERESTING AND THE<br />
STUDENTS ENJOYED HEARING ABOUT HIS ADVENTURES.<br />
8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />
MORE VISUALS AND MORE INTERACTION.<br />
9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />
NONE<br />
4<br />
4<br />
5<br />
4<br />
4<br />
N/<br />
1.<br />
2.<br />
3.<br />
4.<br />
5.<br />
6.<br />
STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />
ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />
EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />
ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />
TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />
QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />
THE CHILDREN WERE CAPTIVATED BY HIS STORYTELLING. HE<br />
SHARED INFORMATION ABOUT HIS INSPIRATION, TECHNIQUES, AND<br />
EXPERIENCE AS AN AUTHOR.<br />
8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />
NONE<br />
9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />
DAN'S PRESENTATION KEPT THE STUDENTS ATTENTION,<br />
ENCOURAGED THEM TO WRITE AND DISCUSS THE IMPORTANCE OF<br />
REVISION. HE WAS WONDERFUL.<br />
ARTIST: DANCE CAVISE, INC.<br />
CONTRACT #: A7891A<br />
TITLE OF PROGRAM: JOE CAVISE - BEYOND BALLROOM DANCING<br />
TYPE OF PROGRAM: ASSEMBLY/RESIDENCY<br />
DISTRICT/ SCHOOL: WHITE PLAINS/GEORGE WASHINGTON ELEM.<br />
# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />
# OF STUDENTS: 118 GRADE(S) 5<br />
DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 10/21-12/1/11<br />
NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />
STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 X STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4 X<br />
ARTIST: DANCE CAVISE, INC.<br />
CONTRACT #: A7891C<br />
TITLE OF PROGRAM: JOE CAVISE - BEYOND BALLROOM DANCING<br />
TYPE OF PROGRAM: ASSEMBLY/RESIDENCY<br />
DISTRICT/ SCHOOL:<br />
# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />
WHITE PLAINS/POST ROAD ELEM.<br />
# OF STUDENTS: 75 GRADE(S) 4<br />
DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 1/20-3/1/12<br />
NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />
STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 X STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4 X<br />
1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />
1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />
1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />
2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />
3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />
4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />
5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />
6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />
4<br />
4<br />
4<br />
4<br />
5<br />
N/<br />
1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />
2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />
3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />
4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />
5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />
6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />
THE STUDENTS WER HIGHY ENGAGED AND THE PARENTS<br />
ENJOYED IT.<br />
8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />
NONE<br />
9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />
NONE<br />
7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />
THIS PROGRAM BUILDS COMMUNITY, MUTUAL RESPECT,<br />
CULTURAL APPRECIATION AND MUSICAL SKILLS.<br />
8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />
NONE<br />
9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />
GREAT WORK WITH OUR STUDENTS.<br />
Arts in Education Service - School Evaluations <strong>2011</strong>-<strong>2012</strong><br />
Page 74 of 332
ARTIST: DANCE CAVISE, INC.<br />
CONTRACT #: A7891E<br />
TITLE OF PROGRAM: JOE CAVISE - BEYOND BALLROOM DANCING<br />
TYPE OF PROGRAM: ASSEMBLY/RESIDENCY<br />
DISTRICT/ SCHOOL:<br />
# OF TEACHERS: 5<br />
WHITE PLAINS/RIDGEWAY ELEM.<br />
# OF STUDENTS: 105 GRADE(S) 4<br />
DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 4/6-6/8/12<br />
NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />
STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 X STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4 X<br />
ARTIST: DANCE CAVISE, INC.<br />
CONTRACT #: A8803<br />
TITLE OF PROGRAM: JOE CAVISE - BEYOND BALLROOM DANCING<br />
TYPE OF PROGRAM: ASSEMBLY/RESIDENCY<br />
DISTRICT/ SCHOOL:<br />
# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />
WHITE PLAINS/ALL ELEM.<br />
# OF STUDENTS: 550 GRADE(S) 4 & 5<br />
DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 4/26-5/18/12<br />
NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />
STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 X STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4 X<br />
1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />
1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />
1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />
2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />
3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />
4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />
5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />
6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />
7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />
IT WAS A WONDERFUL LEARNING EXPERIENCE.<br />
8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />
THE STUDENTS WERE DISAPPOINTED THAT MR. CAVISE WAS NOT<br />
AROUND FOR THE PRACTICES. MS. DIAMOND IS WONDERFUL AND<br />
RAN THE WHOLE SHOW.<br />
9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />
THE COSTUMES ARE BECOMING WORN AND OLD, SOME HAVING<br />
TEARS AND RIPS.<br />
ARTIST: DANCE CAVISE, INC.<br />
CONTRACT #: A7891D<br />
TITLE OF PROGRAM: JOE CAVISE - BEYOND BALLROOM DANCING<br />
TYPE OF PROGRAM: ASSEMBLY/RESIDENCY<br />
DISTRICT/ SCHOOL:<br />
WHITE PLAINS/MAMARONECK AVENUE ELEM. ELEM.<br />
# OF TEACHERS: 4<br />
# OF STUDENTS: 115 GRADE(S) 4<br />
DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE<br />
3/39-5/10/12<br />
NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />
STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 X STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4 X<br />
4<br />
5<br />
4<br />
5<br />
5<br />
4<br />
1.<br />
2.<br />
3.<br />
4.<br />
5.<br />
6.<br />
STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />
ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />
EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />
ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />
TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />
QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />
THE BENEFITS FOR STUDENTS, TEACHERS AND THE SCHOOL<br />
COMMUNITY ARE LIMITLESS. IT IS SO POPULAR AMOUNGST EVERY<br />
CONTINGENCY IN THE DISTRICT.<br />
8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />
NONE<br />
9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />
ARTIST:<br />
NONE<br />
DANCE CAVISE, INC.<br />
CONTRACT #: A7891B<br />
TITLE OF PROGRAM: JOE CAVISE - BEYOND BALLROOM DANCING<br />
TYPE OF PROGRAM: ASSEMBLY/RESIDENCY<br />
DISTRICT/ SCHOOL:<br />
WHITE PLAINS/CHURCH STREET ELEM.<br />
# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />
# OF STUDENTS: 100 GRADE(S) 5<br />
DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE<br />
10/21-12/1/11<br />
NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />
STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 X STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4 X<br />
1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />
1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />
1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />
2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />
3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />
4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />
5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />
6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />
2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />
3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />
4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />
5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />
6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />
4<br />
4<br />
4<br />
4<br />
4<br />
N/<br />
7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM?<br />
NONE<br />
8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />
NONE<br />
9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />
NONE<br />
Y<br />
WHY?<br />
7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />
THE PROGRAM INVOLVES AND ENGAGES ALL STUDENTS IN<br />
CULTURAL DANCE AND TEACHES ABOUT DANCE ETIQUETTE.<br />
8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />
THE ARTIST CAN INVEST IN NEW COSTUMES AND ACCESSORIES<br />
AND EVEN MUSIC.<br />
9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />
WE LOOK FORWARD TO HAVING THE PROGRAM AGAIN.<br />
Arts in Education Service - School Evaluations <strong>2011</strong>-<strong>2012</strong><br />
Page 75 of 332
ARTIST: DANCE IN EDUCATION & THE RELATED CONTRACT #: A7814<br />
TITLE OF PROGRAM: CHRISTIAN CLAESSENS - LIFE SKILLS DANCE<br />
PROGRAM<br />
TYPE OF PROGRAM: RESIDENCY<br />
DISTRICT/ SCHOOL: NEW ROCHELLE/NEW ROCHELLE HS<br />
# OF TEACHERS: 2<br />
# OF STUDENTS: 25 GRADE(S) 9-12<br />
DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 10/17-12/6/11<br />
NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />
STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 X STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />
1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />
1.<br />
2.<br />
3.<br />
4.<br />
5.<br />
6.<br />
STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />
ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />
EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />
ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />
TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />
QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />
5<br />
5<br />
4<br />
5<br />
5<br />
N/<br />
7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />
THE STUDENTS HAVE GROWN IN SELF-ESTEEM AND CONFIDENCE<br />
WHEN PERFORMING ON STAGE. THE PROGRAM ALLOWS THE<br />
STUDENTS TO INTERACT MORE READILY WITH ONE ANOTHER.<br />
8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />
NONE<br />
9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />
HE IS VERY PROFESSIONAL WHEN DEALING WITH THE STUDENTS.<br />
HE IS VERY RESPECTFUL AND IN TURN THE STUDENTS PAY<br />
ATTENTION AND ARE EAGER TO LEARN NEW DANCE STEPS.<br />
ARTIST: DANCE THEATRE OF HARLEM<br />
CONTRACT #: A8008A<br />
TITLE OF PROGRAM: DANCE TECHNIQUES FOR MIDDLE SCHOOL<br />
TYPE OF PROGRAM: RESIDENCY<br />
DISTRICT/ SCHOOL: NEW ROCHELLE/ISAAC YOUNG MIDDLE SCHOOL<br />
# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />
# OF STUDENTS: 102 GRADE(S) 6-8<br />
DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 12/12-16/11<br />
NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />
STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 X STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4 X<br />
ARTIST: DANCE THEATRE OF HARLEM<br />
CONTRACT #: A8472B<br />
TITLE OF PROGRAM: ASTON McCULLOUGH MOVEMENT WORKSHOPS<br />
TYPE OF PROGRAM: RESIDENCY<br />
DISTRICT/ SCHOOL: NEW ROCHELLE/ISAAC YOUNG MIDDLE SCHOOL<br />
# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />
# OF STUDENTS: 82 GRADE(S) 6-8<br />
DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 5/2-16/12<br />
NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />
STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 X STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4 X<br />
1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />
1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />
2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />
3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />
4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />
5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />
6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />
7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />
THE ARTIST WAS ABLE TO GIVE THE STUDENTS A WORKING<br />
VOCABULARY FROM WHICH TO CREATE WITH EASE.<br />
8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />
MODIFICATION OF PROGRAM MAYBE NECESSARY WITH EACH<br />
CLASS SO DON'T HESITATE TO DO SO.<br />
9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />
ARTIST WAS WELL PREPARED, PRESENTED HIS LESSON WITH A<br />
CLEAR FOCUS AND CONTINUED TO BUILD ON HIS CONCEPT FOR<br />
THE 5 DAYS.<br />
ARTIST: DANCE THEATRE OF HARLEM<br />
CONTRACT #: A8008B<br />
TITLE OF PROGRAM: DANCE TECHNIQUES FOR MIDDLE SCHOOL<br />
TYPE OF PROGRAM: RESIDENCY<br />
DISTRICT/ SCHOOL:<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
N/<br />
N/<br />
NEW ROCHELLE/ALBERT LEONARD MIDDLE SCHOOL<br />
# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />
# OF STUDENTS: 376 GRADE(S) 6-8<br />
DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE<br />
12/12-16/11<br />
NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />
STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 X STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4 X<br />
1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />
1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />
1.<br />
2.<br />
3.<br />
4.<br />
5.<br />
6.<br />
STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />
ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />
EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />
ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />
TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />
QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
4<br />
7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />
SCHOOLS CAN GAIN THE EXPERIENCE AND THE VALUE OF DANCE.<br />
STUDENTS WERE FULLY ENGAGED IN THE DANCE CONCEPTS,<br />
ACTIVITIES AND SKILLS.<br />
8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />
NONE<br />
9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />
ASTON WAS AN EXCELLENT DANCE TEACHER WITH EFFECTIVE<br />
CLASSROOM MANAGEMENT SKILLS, ENERGY AND TEACHING<br />
DANCE TECHNIQUES.<br />
1.<br />
2.<br />
3.<br />
4.<br />
5.<br />
6.<br />
STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />
ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />
EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />
ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />
TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />
QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />
THIS PROGRAM WAS SPECIFICALLY DESIGNED FOR OUR SCHOOL<br />
AND EACH GRADE HAS A SPECIFIC LESSON PLAN WITH GOALS<br />
THAT WERE CLEARLY TARGETED AND ACHIEVED.<br />
8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />
NONE<br />
9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />
WE HAD A POSITIVE EXPERIENCE TO BUILD ON.<br />
Arts in Education Service - School Evaluations <strong>2011</strong>-<strong>2012</strong><br />
Page 76 of 332
ARTIST: DANCE THEATRE OF HARLEM<br />
CONTRACT #: A8472A<br />
TITLE OF PROGRAM: DIASPORA PROJECT SHOWS<br />
TYPE OF PROGRAM: ASSEMBLY<br />
DISTRICT/ SCHOOL: NEW ROCHELLE/ISAAC YOUNG MIDDLE SCHOOL<br />
# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />
# OF STUDENTS: 1149 GRADE(S) 6-8<br />
DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 2/9/12<br />
NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />
STANDARD 1 STANDARD 2 STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4 X<br />
1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />
ARTIST: DANCE THEATRE OF HARLEM<br />
CONTRACT #: A8008C<br />
TITLE OF PROGRAM: MEGAN MINTURN, ASTON McCULLOUGH, ADELHEID<br />
STRELICK - DANCE TECHNIQUES & ARTISTRY<br />
TYPE OF PROGRAM: RESIDENCY<br />
DISTRICT/ SCHOOL: NEW ROCHELLE/NEW ROCHELLE HS<br />
# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />
# OF STUDENTS: 32 GRADE(S) 9 & 10<br />
DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 1/27-3/20/12<br />
NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />
STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 X STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4 X<br />
1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />
1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />
2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />
3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />
4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />
5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />
6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />
7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />
THE PROGRAM WAS WELL ORGANIZED, AESTHETICALLY<br />
ENJOYABLE AND EXTREMELY INFORMATIVE.<br />
8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />
NONE<br />
9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />
BECAUSE THE PROGRAM RELATED PERSONAL EXPERIENCES OF<br />
THE PERFORMERS AND THE ARTISTS PROTRAYED STUDENTS<br />
WERE ABLE TO INTERNALIZE THEIR EXPERIENCE, HERITAGE AND<br />
SEE THE POSSIBILITIES.<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />
2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />
3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />
4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />
5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />
6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />
7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />
THEY HAD A CONTENT FILLED PROGRAM.<br />
8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />
NONE<br />
9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />
NONE<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
ARTIST: DANCE VECTORS, INC. dba PHYLLIS RO<br />
CONTRACT #: A8192<br />
TITLE OF PROGRAM: STEP LIVELY PLEASE - AFRICAN AMERICAN<br />
CELEBRATION<br />
TYPE OF PROGRAM: ASSEMBLY<br />
DISTRICT/ SCHOOL: LAKELAND/GEORGE WASHINGTON ELEM.<br />
# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />
# OF STUDENTS: 499 GRADE(S) K-5<br />
DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 3/9/12<br />
NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />
STANDARD 1 STANDARD 2 STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4 X<br />
ARTIST: DANCE VECTORS, INC. dba PHYLLIS RO<br />
CONTRACT #: A8426<br />
TITLE OF PROGRAM: STEP LIVELY PLEASE - AFRICAN AMERICAN<br />
CELEBRATION<br />
TYPE OF PROGRAM: ASSEMBLY<br />
DISTRICT/ SCHOOL:<br />
# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />
YORKTOWN/CROMPOND ELEM.<br />
# OF STUDENTS: 400 GRADE(S) 4 & 5<br />
DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 2/17/12<br />
NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />
STANDARD 1 STANDARD 2 STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4 X<br />
1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />
1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />
1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />
2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />
3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />
4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />
5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />
6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />
7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />
THE STUDENTS GOT A GOOD UNDERSTANDING OF THE AFRICAN<br />
AMERICAN CULTURE THROUGH THE ARTS.<br />
8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />
NONE<br />
9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />
NONE<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
N/<br />
1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />
2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />
3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />
4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />
5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />
6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />
7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />
THE PERFORMERS WERE GREAT AND THE STUDENTS HAD A<br />
WONDERFUL TIME INTERACTING WITH THEM.<br />
8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />
NONE<br />
9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />
NONE<br />
5<br />
4<br />
4<br />
5<br />
5<br />
4<br />
Arts in Education Service - School Evaluations <strong>2011</strong>-<strong>2012</strong><br />
Page 77 of 332
ARTIST: DANIEL FORMAN<br />
CONTRACT #: A7890C<br />
TITLE OF PROGRAM: ACCOMPANIST FOR THE CHOIR PERFORMANCE<br />
TYPE OF PROGRAM: ASSEMBLY<br />
DISTRICT/ SCHOOL: WHITE PLAINS/WHITE PLAINS HIGH SCHOOL<br />
# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />
# OF STUDENTS: GRADE(S) 9-12<br />
DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 5/31/12<br />
NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />
STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />
ARTIST: DANIEL FORMAN<br />
CONTRACT #: A7890A<br />
TITLE OF PROGRAM: ACCOMPANIST FOR THE CHOIR PERFORMANCE<br />
TYPE OF PROGRAM: ASSEMBLY<br />
DISTRICT/ SCHOOL: WHITE PLAINS/WHITE PLAINS HIGH SCHOOL<br />
# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />
# OF STUDENTS: GRADE(S) 9-12<br />
DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 12/13-15/11<br />
NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />
STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />
1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />
1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />
1.<br />
2.<br />
3.<br />
4.<br />
5.<br />
6.<br />
STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />
ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />
EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />
ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />
TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />
QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />
DAN IS EASY TO WORK WITH AND THE STUDENTS REALLY<br />
RESPOND WELL TO HIM AND APPRECIATE HIS CONTRIBUTION TO<br />
OUR CNCERT.<br />
8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />
NONE<br />
9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />
NONE<br />
1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />
2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />
3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />
4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />
5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />
6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />
7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />
DAN IS ALWAYS WELL PREPARED AND PROFESSIONAL.<br />
8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />
NONE<br />
9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />
NONE<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
N/<br />
ARTIST: DANIEL FORMAN<br />
CONTRACT #: A7890B<br />
TITLE OF PROGRAM: ACCOMPANIST FOR THE CHOIR PERFORMANCE<br />
TYPE OF PROGRAM: ASSEMBLY<br />
DISTRICT/ SCHOOL: WHITE PLAINS/WHITE PLAINS HIGH SCHOOL<br />
# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />
# OF STUDENTS: GRADE(S) 9-12<br />
DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 3/15/12<br />
NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />
STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />
ARTIST: DANIEL GUTMAN<br />
CONTRACT #: A8770<br />
TITLE OF PROGRAM: AUTHOR VISIT<br />
TYPE OF PROGRAM: ASSEMBLY<br />
DISTRICT/ SCHOOL:<br />
# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />
BRIARCLIFF/TODD ELEM.<br />
# OF STUDENTS: 350 GRADE(S) 3-5<br />
DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 5/11/12<br />
NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />
STANDARD 1 STANDARD 2 STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />
1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />
1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />
1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />
2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />
3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />
4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />
5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />
6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />
7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />
NONE<br />
8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />
NONE<br />
9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />
NONE<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
1.<br />
2.<br />
3.<br />
4.<br />
5.<br />
6.<br />
STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />
ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />
EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />
ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />
TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />
QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />
DAN IS INFORMATIVE AND ENGAGING. HE WAS A PHENOMENAL<br />
SUCCESS AND AS SEVERAL STUDENTS SAID "THE BEST AUTHOR<br />
VISIT EVER".<br />
8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />
NONE<br />
9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />
NONE<br />
Arts in Education Service - School Evaluations <strong>2011</strong>-<strong>2012</strong><br />
Page 78 of 332
ARTIST:<br />
DANIEL GUTMAN<br />
TITLE OF PROGRAM: AUTHOR VISIT<br />
TYPE OF PROGRAM: ASSEMBLY<br />
DISTRICT/ SCHOOL:<br />
EASTCHESTER/GREENVALE ELEM.<br />
CONTRACT #: A7566<br />
# OF TEACHERS: 6<br />
# OF STUDENTS: 525 GRADE(S) 2-5<br />
DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE<br />
1/13/12<br />
NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />
STANDARD 1 STANDARD 2 STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />
1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />
1.<br />
2.<br />
3.<br />
4.<br />
5.<br />
6.<br />
STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />
ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />
EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />
ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />
TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />
QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />
VERY GOOD WITH CHILDREN. ANSWERED ALL QUESTIONS AND<br />
WAS HELPFUL IN MAKING STUDENTS UNDERSTAND THE LIFE OF AN<br />
ARTIST.<br />
8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />
NONE<br />
9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />
NONE<br />
ARTIST: DARIUS KAUFMANN<br />
CONTRACT #: A8422<br />
TITLE OF PROGRAM: JOURNEYS WITH SOUND - MUSIC OF THE EARTH<br />
TYPE OF PROGRAM: ASSEMBLY<br />
DISTRICT/ SCHOOL: HENDRICK HUDSON/FURNACE WOODS ELEM.<br />
# OF TEACHERS: 10 # OF STUDENTS: 240 GRADE(S) K-5<br />
DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 4/27/12<br />
NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />
STANDARD 1 STANDARD 2 STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4 X<br />
ARTIST: DARIUS KAUFMANN<br />
CONTRACT #: A7756<br />
TITLE OF PROGRAM: DARIUS KAUFMANN - JOURNEYS WITH SOUND -<br />
MUSIC OF THE EARTH<br />
TYPE OF PROGRAM: ASSEMBLY<br />
DISTRICT/ SCHOOL:<br />
CROTON/CET ELEM.<br />
# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />
# OF STUDENTS: 620 GRADE(S) K-4<br />
DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 12/5/11<br />
NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />
STANDARD 1 STANDARD 2 STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4 X<br />
1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />
1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />
2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />
3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />
4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />
5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />
6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />
7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />
WHEN THEY WERE PLAYING THE STUDENTS WERE CAPTIVATED.<br />
8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />
SOMETIMES THE SPEAKING PARTS WERE A LITTLE LONG.<br />
9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />
IT WAS A GREAT ASSEMBLY.<br />
ARTIST: DARIUS KAUFMANN<br />
CONTRACT #: A8393<br />
TITLE OF PROGRAM: JOURNEYS WITH SOUND - MUSIC OF THE EARTH<br />
TYPE OF PROGRAM: ASSEMBLY<br />
DISTRICT/ SCHOOL:<br />
EASTCHESTER/GREENVALE ELEM.<br />
# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />
# OF STUDENTS: 142 GRADE(S) 3<br />
DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE<br />
4/9/12<br />
NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />
STANDARD 1 STANDARD 2 STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4 X<br />
5<br />
5<br />
4<br />
5<br />
5<br />
4<br />
1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />
1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />
1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />
2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />
3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />
4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />
5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />
6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />
7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />
THE CHILDREN WERE ENGAGED AND THEY WERE EAGER<br />
PARTICIPANTS. THE CHILDREN WERE VERY CALM AND RELAXED<br />
WHEN THEY RETURNED TO CLASS.<br />
8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />
IT WAS A GOOD PROGRAM BUT IT DID NOT EMPHASIZE "TAKING<br />
CARE OF THE EARTH" AS I HAD HOPED.<br />
9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />
WHEN THE STUDENTS WERE ASKED QUESTIONS, THEY BECAME<br />
DISTRACTED AND WERE NOT REFOCUSED BY PRESENTER.<br />
4.5<br />
4.9<br />
4.2<br />
4.7<br />
4.6<br />
N/<br />
1.<br />
2.<br />
3.<br />
4.<br />
5.<br />
6.<br />
STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />
ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />
EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />
ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />
TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />
QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />
DARIUS HAS A GREAT KNOWLEDGE OF MUSIC AND INSTRUMENTS<br />
FROM AROUND THE WORLD, AND ENGAGED THE CHILDREN.<br />
8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />
NONE<br />
9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />
NONE<br />
Arts in Education Service - School Evaluations <strong>2011</strong>-<strong>2012</strong><br />
Page 79 of 332
ARTIST: DARIUS KAUFMANN<br />
CONTRACT #: A8141<br />
TITLE OF PROGRAM: JOURNEYS WITH SOUND - WINTER SOLSTICE<br />
WORLD MUSIC<br />
TYPE OF PROGRAM: ASSEMBLY<br />
DISTRICT/ SCHOOL: NEW ROCHELLE/DAVIS ELEM. SCHOOL<br />
# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />
# OF STUDENTS: 700 GRADE(S) K-5<br />
DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 12/15/11<br />
NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />
STANDARD 1 STANDARD 2 STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4 X<br />
1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />
ARTIST: DARIUS KAUFMANN<br />
CONTRACT #: A8848<br />
TITLE OF PROGRAM: JOURNEYS WITH SOUND - WORLD MUSIC<br />
TYPE OF PROGRAM: ASSEMBLY<br />
DISTRICT/ SCHOOL: NEW ROCHELLE/DAVIS ELEM. SCHOOL<br />
# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />
# OF STUDENTS: 700 GRADE(S) K-5<br />
DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 5/15/12<br />
NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />
STANDARD 1 STANDARD 2 STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4 X<br />
1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />
1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />
2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />
3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />
4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />
5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />
6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />
7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />
THERE WAS A REAL EARTH CONNECTION TO INDIGENIOUS<br />
MUSICAL INSTRUMENTS.<br />
8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />
NONE<br />
9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />
DARIUS WAS WONDERFUL WITH THE CHILDREN AND VERY<br />
INTERACTIVE.<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />
2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />
3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />
4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />
5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />
6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />
7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />
THE MUSIC PERFORMANCE WAS UNIQUE. DARIUS HAD AN<br />
ENGAGING, GENTLE MANNER.<br />
8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />
NONE<br />
9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />
EXCELLENT.<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
ARTIST: DAVID ADLER<br />
CONTRACT #: A8490<br />
TITLE OF PROGRAM: AUTHOR/ILLUSTRATOR VISIT<br />
TYPE OF PROGRAM: ASSEMBLY<br />
DISTRICT/ SCHOOL:<br />
# OF TEACHERS: 4<br />
NORTH SALEM/PQ ELEM.<br />
# OF STUDENTS: 80 GRADE(S) 1<br />
DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 3/20/12<br />
NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />
STANDARD 1 STANDARD 2 STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />
ARTIST: DAVID ADLER<br />
CONTRACT #: A7575<br />
TITLE OF PROGRAM: AUTHOR/ILLUSTRATOR VISIT<br />
TYPE OF PROGRAM: ASSEMBLY<br />
DISTRICT/ SCHOOL:<br />
# OF TEACHERS: 7<br />
BYRAM HILLS/COMAN HILL ELEM.<br />
# OF STUDENTS: 400 GRADE(S) 1 & 2<br />
DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 2/6 & 7/12<br />
NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />
STANDARD 1 STANDARD 2 STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />
1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />
1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />
1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />
2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />
3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />
4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />
5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />
6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />
2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />
3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />
4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />
5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />
6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />
5<br />
4<br />
4<br />
4<br />
4<br />
4<br />
7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />
EXCELLENT PRESENTER. ENGAGED STUDENTS AND<br />
PRESENTATION WAS APPROPRIATE LEVEL FOR STUDENTS.<br />
8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />
NONE<br />
9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />
NONE<br />
7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />
HE WAS WONDERFUL WITH THE STUDENTS. HIS INTERACTION<br />
WITH BOTH THE STUDENTS AND TEACHERS WAS FANTASTIC.<br />
8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />
NONE<br />
9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />
NONE<br />
Arts in Education Service - School Evaluations <strong>2011</strong>-<strong>2012</strong><br />
Page 80 of 332
ARTIST: DAVID B. JOHNSON<br />
CONTRACT #: A8306<br />
TITLE OF PROGRAM: ACCOMPANIST FOR THE SHOW - GUYS & DOLLS<br />
TYPE OF PROGRAM: ASSEMBLY/RESIDENCY<br />
DISTRICT/ SCHOOL: KATONAH/LEWISBORO/JOHN JAY HIGH SCHOOL<br />
# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />
# OF STUDENTS: 150 GRADE(S) 9-12<br />
DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 2/1-3/22/12<br />
NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />
STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />
1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />
ARTIST: DAVID BARANOWSKI<br />
CONTRACT #: A7532<br />
TITLE OF PROGRAM: PIANIST FOR THE SHOW - THE DROWSY<br />
CHAPERSONE<br />
TYPE OF PROGRAM: ASSEMBLY<br />
DISTRICT/ SCHOOL: CHAPPAQUA/HORACE GREELEY HIGH SCHOOL<br />
# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />
# OF STUDENTS: 27 GRADE(S) 9-12<br />
DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 9/12-11/19/11<br />
NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />
STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />
1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />
1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />
2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />
3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />
4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />
5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />
6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />
7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />
NONE<br />
8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />
NONE<br />
9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />
NONE<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
1.<br />
2.<br />
3.<br />
4.<br />
5.<br />
6.<br />
STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />
ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />
EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />
ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />
TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />
QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
N/<br />
7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />
DAVE IS A FANTASTIC MUSICIAN. A PLEASURE TO WORK WITH AND<br />
THE STUDENTS ADORE HIM.<br />
8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />
NONE<br />
9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />
I LOOK FORWARD TO WORKING WITH DAVE AGAIN.<br />
ARTIST: DAVID BECKER<br />
CONTRACT #: A8627<br />
TITLE OF PROGRAM: DIGITAL DOCUMENTARY FILM<br />
TYPE OF PROGRAM: WORKSHOP<br />
DISTRICT/ SCHOOL: HASTINGS/FARRAGUT MIDDLE SCHOOL<br />
# OF TEACHERS: 3<br />
# OF STUDENTS: 114 GRADE(S) 7<br />
DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 2/28-3/15/12<br />
NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />
STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 X STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4 X<br />
ARTIST: DAVID KLOTZLE<br />
CONTRACT #: A8734<br />
TITLE OF PROGRAM: NATIVE AMERICAN STORIES<br />
TYPE OF PROGRAM: RESIDENCY<br />
DISTRICT/ SCHOOL:<br />
# OF TEACHERS: 3<br />
PEEKSKILL/WOODSIDE ELEM.<br />
# OF STUDENTS: 200 GRADE(S) PRE K-1<br />
DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 4/9-17/12<br />
NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />
STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 X STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4 X<br />
1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />
1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />
1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />
2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />
3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />
4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />
5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />
6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />
2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />
3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />
4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />
5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />
6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />
THIS PROGRAM WAS THOUGHT PROVOKING AND GREATLY<br />
ENHANCED THE STUDENTS UNDERSTANDING OF THE<br />
DOCUMENTARY FILM PROCESS AND THE U.S. CONSTITUTION.<br />
8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />
NONE<br />
9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />
WE TRULY ENJOYED WORKING WITH DAVID.<br />
7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />
ALWAYS WONDERFUL. KEEPS THE STUDENTS MOTIVATED AND<br />
INTERESTED.<br />
8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />
NONE<br />
9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />
NONE<br />
Arts in Education Service - School Evaluations <strong>2011</strong>-<strong>2012</strong><br />
Page 81 of 332
ARTIST: DAVID KLOTZLE<br />
CONTRACT #: A8239<br />
TITLE OF PROGRAM: WINTER STORIES<br />
TYPE OF PROGRAM: ASSEMBLY/WORKSHOP<br />
DISTRICT/ SCHOOL:<br />
# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />
PEEKSKILL/OAKSIDE ELEM.<br />
# OF STUDENTS: GRADE(S) 2 & 3<br />
DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 1/9-18/12<br />
NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />
STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 X STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4 X<br />
1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />
ARTIST: DAVID PRATT<br />
CONTRACT #: A8653<br />
TITLE OF PROGRAM: TRUMPET PLAYER FOR THE SHOW - A FUNNY THING<br />
HAPPENED ON THE WAY TO THE FORUM<br />
TYPE OF PROGRAM: ASSEMBLY<br />
DISTRICT/ SCHOOL: PUTNAM VALLEY/PUTNAM VALLEY HIGH SCHOOL<br />
# OF TEACHERS: 3<br />
# OF STUDENTS: 400 GRADE(S) 9-12<br />
DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 4/13-23/12<br />
NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />
STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />
1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />
1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />
2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />
3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />
4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />
5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />
6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />
7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />
NONE<br />
8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />
NONE<br />
9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />
NONE<br />
4<br />
5<br />
4<br />
4<br />
N/<br />
N/<br />
1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />
2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />
3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />
4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />
5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />
6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />
7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />
NONE<br />
8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />
NONE<br />
9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />
NONE<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
ARTIST: DAVID RADOVICH<br />
CONTRACT #: A8534<br />
TITLE OF PROGRAM: FLUTE PLAYER FOR THE SHOW - ONCE UPON A<br />
MATTRESS<br />
TYPE OF PROGRAM: ASSEMBLY<br />
DISTRICT/ SCHOOL:<br />
# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />
SOMERS/SOMERS HIGH SCHOOL<br />
# OF STUDENTS: 50 GRADE(S) 9-12<br />
DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 3/12-18/12<br />
NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />
STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />
ARTIST: DAVID RADOVICH<br />
CONTRACT #: A8648<br />
TITLE OF PROGRAM: REED PLAYER FOR THE SHOW - A FUNNY THING<br />
HAPPENED ON THE WAY TO THE FORUM<br />
TYPE OF PROGRAM: ASSEMBLY<br />
DISTRICT/ SCHOOL: PUTNAM VALLEY/PUTNAM VALLEY HIGH SCHOOL<br />
# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />
# OF STUDENTS: 400 GRADE(S) 9-12<br />
DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 4/13-23/12<br />
NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />
STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />
1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />
1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />
1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />
2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />
3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />
4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />
5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />
6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />
2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />
3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />
4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />
5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />
6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM?<br />
NONE<br />
Y<br />
WHY?<br />
7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM?<br />
NONE<br />
Y<br />
WHY?<br />
8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />
NONE<br />
9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />
NONE<br />
8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />
NONE<br />
9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />
NONE<br />
Arts in Education Service - School Evaluations <strong>2011</strong>-<strong>2012</strong><br />
Page 82 of 332
ARTIST: DAVID RADOVICH<br />
CONTRACT #: A8671<br />
TITLE OF PROGRAM: REED PLAYER FOR THE SHOW - GUYS & DOLLS<br />
TYPE OF PROGRAM: ASSEMBLY<br />
DISTRICT/ SCHOOL: KATONAH/LEWISBORO/JOHN JAY HIGH SCHOOL<br />
# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />
# OF STUDENTS: 150 GRADE(S) 9-12<br />
DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 3/22-24/12<br />
NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />
STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />
ARTIST: DAVID SEXTON<br />
CONTRACT #: A8764<br />
TITLE OF PROGRAM: LIGHTING DESIGNER FOR THE SHOW - OUR TOWN<br />
TYPE OF PROGRAM: RESIDENCY<br />
DISTRICT/ SCHOOL: CHAPPAQUA/HORACE GREELEY HIGH SCHOOL<br />
# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />
# OF STUDENTS: 22 GRADE(S) 9-12<br />
DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 4/23-5/5/12<br />
NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />
STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 X STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />
1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />
1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />
1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />
2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />
3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />
4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />
5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />
6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />
2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />
3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />
4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />
5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />
6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM?<br />
NONE<br />
8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />
NONE<br />
9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />
NONE<br />
Y<br />
WHY?<br />
7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />
DAVID IS A FANTASTIC DESIGNER AND WORKS WELL WITH THE<br />
STUDENTS.<br />
8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />
NONE<br />
9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />
NONE<br />
ARTIST: DAVID SEXTON<br />
CONTRACT #: A7774<br />
TITLE OF PROGRAM: LIGHTING DESIGNER FOR THE SHOW - THE DROWSY<br />
CHAPERONE<br />
TYPE OF PROGRAM: RESIDENCY<br />
DISTRICT/ SCHOOL: CHAPPAQUA/HORACE GREELEY HIGH SCHOOL<br />
# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />
# OF STUDENTS: 25 GRADE(S) 9-12<br />
DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 11/4-19/11<br />
NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />
STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 X STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />
1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />
ARTIST: DAVID SEXTON<br />
CONTRACT #: A8556<br />
TITLE OF PROGRAM: LIGHTING DESIGNER FOR THE SHOW - XANADU<br />
TYPE OF PROGRAM: RESIDENCY<br />
DISTRICT/ SCHOOL: CHAPPAQUA/HORACE GREELEY HIGH SCHOOL<br />
# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />
# OF STUDENTS: 200 GRADE(S) 12<br />
DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 4/19-21/12<br />
NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />
STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 X STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />
1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />
1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />
2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />
3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />
4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />
5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />
6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />
7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />
DAVID IS A GIFTED ARTIST.<br />
8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />
NONE<br />
9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />
LOOK FORWARD TO WORKING WITH HIM AGAIN.<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
1.<br />
2.<br />
3.<br />
4.<br />
5.<br />
6.<br />
STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />
ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />
EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />
ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />
TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />
QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />
IMPORTANT FOR STUDENTS TO SEE HOW ALL THE COMPONENTS<br />
OF A MUSICAL SHOW ARE DESIGNED, CREATED AND COME<br />
TOGETHER.<br />
8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />
NONE<br />
9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />
TALENTED LIGHTING DESIGNER AND THE STUDENTS ENJOYED<br />
WORKING WITH AND LEARNING FROM DAVID.<br />
Arts in Education Service - School Evaluations <strong>2011</strong>-<strong>2012</strong><br />
Page 83 of 332
ARTIST: DAVID WALSH<br />
CONTRACT #: A7684<br />
TITLE OF PROGRAM: SET DESIGN & CONSTRUCTION FOR THE FALL SHOW<br />
TYPE OF PROGRAM: RESIDENCY<br />
DISTRICT/ SCHOOL: KATONAH/LEWISBORO/JOHN JAY HIGH SCHOOL<br />
# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />
# OF STUDENTS: 400 GRADE(S) 9-12<br />
DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 10/24-11/16/11<br />
NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />
STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 X STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />
1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />
ARTIST: DAVID WALSH<br />
CONTRACT #: A8309<br />
TITLE OF PROGRAM: SET DESIGN & CONSTRUCTION FOR THE SHOW -<br />
GUYS & DOLLS<br />
TYPE OF PROGRAM: RESIDENCY<br />
DISTRICT/ SCHOOL: KATONAH/LEWISBORO/JOHN JAY HIGH SCHOOL<br />
# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />
# OF STUDENTS: 50 GRADE(S) 9-12<br />
DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 2/1-3/22/12<br />
NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />
STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 X STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />
1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />
1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />
2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />
3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />
4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />
5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />
6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />
7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />
NONE<br />
8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />
NONE<br />
9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />
NONE<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />
2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />
3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />
4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />
5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />
6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />
7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />
NONE<br />
8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />
NONE<br />
9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />
NONE<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
ARTIST: DAVID WALSH<br />
CONTRACT #: A8839<br />
TITLE OF PROGRAM: SET DESIGN & CONSTRUCTION FOR THE SPRING<br />
CONCERTS<br />
TYPE OF PROGRAM: RESIDENCY<br />
DISTRICT/ SCHOOL: KATONAH/LEWISBORO/JOHN JAY HIGH SCHOOL<br />
# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />
# OF STUDENTS: 450 GRADE(S) 9-12<br />
DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 5/23-6/4/12<br />
NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />
STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 X STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />
ARTIST: DAVID WALSH<br />
CONTRACT #: A8163<br />
TITLE OF PROGRAM: SET DESIGN & CONSTRUCTION FOR THE WINTER<br />
CONCERT<br />
TYPE OF PROGRAM: RESIDENCY<br />
DISTRICT/ SCHOOL: KATONAH/LEWISBORO/JOHN JAY HIGH SCHOOL<br />
# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />
# OF STUDENTS: 400 GRADE(S) 9-12<br />
DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 1/9-30/12<br />
NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />
STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 X STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />
1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />
1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />
1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />
2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />
3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />
4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />
5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />
6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />
2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />
3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />
4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />
5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />
6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM?<br />
NONE<br />
Y<br />
WHY?<br />
7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM?<br />
NONE<br />
Y<br />
WHY?<br />
8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />
NONE<br />
9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />
NONE<br />
8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />
NONE<br />
9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />
NONE<br />
Arts in Education Service - School Evaluations <strong>2011</strong>-<strong>2012</strong><br />
Page 84 of 332
ARTIST: DAVID ZUCKER<br />
CONTRACT #: A8685<br />
TITLE OF PROGRAM: POETRY IN MOTION<br />
TYPE OF PROGRAM: ASSEMBLY<br />
DISTRICT/ SCHOOL: LAKELAND/THOMAS JEFFERSON ELEM.<br />
# OF TEACHERS: 2<br />
# OF STUDENTS: 125 GRADE(S) 1 & 2<br />
DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 3/19/12<br />
NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />
STANDARD 1 STANDARD 2 STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />
ARTIST: DAVYD H. SUBER, JR.<br />
CONTRACT #: A8221<br />
TITLE OF PROGRAM: CHOREOGRAPHER FOR THE WINTER MUSICAL<br />
TYPE OF PROGRAM: RESIDENCY<br />
DISTRICT/ SCHOOL: BRIARCLIFF/BRIARCLIFF HIGH SCHOOL<br />
# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />
# OF STUDENTS: 40 GRADE(S) 9-12<br />
DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 1/5-3/11/12<br />
NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />
STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 X STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />
1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />
1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />
1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />
2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />
3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />
4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />
5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />
6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />
7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />
HE WAS ENGAGING. HE EXPLAINED POETRY TO MAKE IT ENTICING<br />
FOR YOUNG CHILDREN. THE CHILDREN UNDERSTOOD THE<br />
MESSAGE HE WAS CONVEYING.<br />
8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />
REMIND TEACHERS TO VISIT WEBSITE PRIOR TO VISIT. THAT IS<br />
WHERE THE SUPPORT MATERIALS FOR THE PROGRAM IS FOUND.<br />
9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />
THE SHOW WAS ENJOYED BY STUDENTS AND TEACHERS.<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />
2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />
3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />
4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />
5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />
6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />
7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />
HIS KNOWLEDGE, MANNERS AND ENTHUSIAM WAS GREATLY<br />
APPRECIATED.<br />
8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />
NONE<br />
9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />
NONE<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
ARTIST: DEBORAH FEINSTEIN<br />
CONTRACT #: A8299<br />
TITLE OF PROGRAM: DRAMA CLASS PLAY PRODUCTION<br />
TYPE OF PROGRAM: RESIDENCY<br />
DISTRICT/ SCHOOL: KATONAH/LEWISBORO/LEWISBORO ELEM.<br />
# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />
# OF STUDENTS: GRADE(S) 4 & 5<br />
DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 1/20-3/29/12<br />
NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />
STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 X STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />
ARTIST: DEBORAH FEINSTEIN<br />
CONTRACT #: A8769<br />
TITLE OF PROGRAM: THEATRE GAMES<br />
TYPE OF PROGRAM: WORKSHOP<br />
DISTRICT/ SCHOOL: KATONAH/LEWISBORO/LEWISBORO ELEM.<br />
# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />
# OF STUDENTS: GRADE(S) 3-5<br />
DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 4/25-5/30/12<br />
NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />
STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 X STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />
1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />
1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />
1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />
2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />
3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />
4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />
5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />
6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />
7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />
DEBBIE BROUGHT THE CONCEPT OF A SCHOOL PLAY TO A<br />
DIFFERENT LEVEL.<br />
8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />
NONE<br />
9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />
THE CHILDREN ALL HAD A GREAT TIME. THEY LEARNED A LOT AND<br />
I SAW A LOT OF BRIGHT SMILES ON STAGE.<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
1.<br />
2.<br />
3.<br />
4.<br />
5.<br />
6.<br />
STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />
ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />
EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />
ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />
TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />
QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
4<br />
7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />
DEBBIE IS A GREAT PROFESSIONAL WHO TAKES THEATRE VERY<br />
SERIOUS AND REALLY WANTS TO TEACH THE CHILDREN<br />
SOMETHING IN A VERY PLAYFUL WAY.<br />
8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />
NONE<br />
9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />
NONE<br />
Arts in Education Service - School Evaluations <strong>2011</strong>-<strong>2012</strong><br />
Page 85 of 332
ARTIST: DEBRA DASHNAW<br />
CONTRACT #: A8330<br />
TITLE OF PROGRAM: FLUTE & PICCOLO PLAYER FOR THE SHOW - MY FAIR<br />
LADY<br />
TYPE OF PROGRAM: ASSEMBLY<br />
DISTRICT/ SCHOOL: LAKELAND/WALTER PANAS HIGH SCHOOL<br />
# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />
# OF STUDENTS: 200 GRADE(S) 9-12<br />
DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 4/30-5/5/12<br />
NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />
STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />
ARTIST: DEBRA DASHNAW<br />
CONTRACT #: A7715<br />
TITLE OF PROGRAM: REED PLAYER FOR THE SHOW - ANNIE GET YOUR<br />
GUN<br />
TYPE OF PROGRAM: ASSEMBLY<br />
DISTRICT/ SCHOOL: LAKELAND/WALTER PANAS HIGH SCHOOL<br />
# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />
# OF STUDENTS: 100 GRADE(S) 9-12<br />
DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 11/14-19/11<br />
NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />
STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />
1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />
1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />
1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />
2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />
3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />
4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />
5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />
6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />
2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />
3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />
4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />
5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />
6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM?<br />
NONE<br />
Y<br />
WHY?<br />
7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM?<br />
NONE<br />
Y<br />
WHY?<br />
8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />
NONE<br />
9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />
NONE<br />
8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />
NONE<br />
9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />
NONE<br />
ARTIST: DEBRA HAMPTON<br />
CONTRACT #: A7825<br />
TITLE OF PROGRAM: CREATIVE PROCESS WORKSHOPS<br />
TYPE OF PROGRAM: WORKSHOP<br />
DISTRICT/ SCHOOL: NEW ROCHELLE/NEW ROCHELLE HS<br />
# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />
# OF STUDENTS: 80 GRADE(S) 9-12<br />
DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 10/19/11<br />
NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />
STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 X STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />
1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />
ARTIST: DEBRA SAUTNER<br />
CONTRACT #: A7714<br />
TITLE OF PROGRAM: BASS PLAYER FOR THE SHOW - ANNIE GET YOUR<br />
GUN<br />
TYPE OF PROGRAM: ASSEMBLY<br />
DISTRICT/ SCHOOL: LAKELAND/WALTER PANAS HIGH SCHOOL<br />
# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />
# OF STUDENTS: 100 GRADE(S) 9-12<br />
DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 11/14-19/11<br />
NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />
STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />
1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />
1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />
2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />
3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />
4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />
5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />
6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />
7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />
SPOKE CLEARLY, EXPLAINED STEP BY STEP WORK PROCESS<br />
WELL, GREAT SAMPLES OF 2D, 3D AND GRAPHIC WORKS.<br />
8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />
NONE<br />
9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />
THE STUDENTS LOVED HER. THEY ASKED FOR AUTOGRAPHS.<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />
2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />
3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />
4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />
5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />
6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />
7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />
DEBRA IS A TRUE PROFESSIONAL.<br />
8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />
NONE<br />
9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />
NONE<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
Arts in Education Service - School Evaluations <strong>2011</strong>-<strong>2012</strong><br />
Page 86 of 332
ARTIST: DEBRA SAUTNER<br />
CONTRACT #: A8329<br />
TITLE OF PROGRAM: BASS PLAYER FOR THE SHOW - MY FAIR LADY<br />
TYPE OF PROGRAM: ASSEMBLY<br />
DISTRICT/ SCHOOL: LAKELAND/WALTER PANAS HIGH SCHOOL<br />
# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />
# OF STUDENTS: 200 GRADE(S) 9-12<br />
DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 4/30-5/5/12<br />
NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />
STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />
ARTIST: DENISE BLACK<br />
CONTRACT #: A8020<br />
TITLE OF PROGRAM: COSTUME DESIGNER FOR JAZZ CO SHOW<br />
TYPE OF PROGRAM: RESIDENCY<br />
DISTRICT/ SCHOOL: TUCKAHOE/TUCKAHOE HIGH SCHOOL<br />
# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />
# OF STUDENTS: 60 GRADE(S) 9-12<br />
DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 11/28/11-3/3/12<br />
NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />
STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 X STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />
1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />
1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />
1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />
2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />
3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />
4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />
5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />
6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />
7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />
NONE<br />
8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />
NONE<br />
9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />
NONE<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
1.<br />
2.<br />
3.<br />
4.<br />
5.<br />
6.<br />
STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />
ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />
EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />
ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />
TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />
QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />
EXCELLENT WINTER PROGRAM FOR ARTS EDUCATION, PHYSICAL<br />
ACTIVITY.<br />
8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />
NONE<br />
9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />
NONE<br />
ARTIST: DENISE SCHIRMER<br />
CONTRACT #: A7569<br />
TITLE OF PROGRAM: INDIAN STORIES & ARTIFACTS / THE BEAVER FUR<br />
TRADE TALES<br />
TYPE OF PROGRAM: ASSEMBLY<br />
DISTRICT/ SCHOOL: EASTCHESTER/GREENVALE ELEM.<br />
# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />
# OF STUDENTS: 155 GRADE(S) 4<br />
DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 2/10/12<br />
NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />
STANDARD 1 STANDARD 2 STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4 X<br />
1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />
ARTIST: DIANA ENGEL<br />
CONTRACT #: A7605<br />
TITLE OF PROGRAM: AUTHOR VISIT<br />
TYPE OF PROGRAM: ASSEMBLY<br />
DISTRICT/ SCHOOL: HENDRICK HUDSON/FURNACE WOODS ELEM.<br />
# OF TEACHERS: 2<br />
# OF STUDENTS: 40 GRADE(S) 1<br />
DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 11/22/11<br />
NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />
STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />
1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />
1.<br />
2.<br />
3.<br />
4.<br />
5.<br />
6.<br />
STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />
ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />
EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />
ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />
TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />
QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />
4<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />
EXCELLENT PROGRAM. VERY INFORMATIVE AND EDUCATIONAL..<br />
8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />
NONE<br />
9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />
NONE<br />
1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />
2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />
3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />
4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />
5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />
6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />
7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />
IT'S ESPECIALLY A GOOD KICK-OFF TO TEACH THE CHILDREN<br />
ABOUT BOOKMAKING.<br />
8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />
NONE<br />
9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />
WE LOVE DIANA'S VISIT.<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
Arts in Education Service - School Evaluations <strong>2011</strong>-<strong>2012</strong><br />
Page 87 of 332
ARTIST: DIANA SELENOW<br />
CONTRACT #: A8300<br />
TITLE OF PROGRAM: DIRECTOR FOR SPRING MUSICAL - BYE, BYE BIRDIE<br />
TYPE OF PROGRAM: RESIDENCY<br />
DISTRICT/ SCHOOL: IRVINGTON/IRVINGTON HIGH SCHOOL<br />
# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />
# OF STUDENTS: GRADE(S) 9-12<br />
DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 1/17-3/17/12<br />
NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />
STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 X STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />
ARTIST: DIANA SELENOW<br />
CONTRACT #: A7633<br />
TITLE OF PROGRAM: DIRECTOR FOR SPRING MUSICAL - WIZARD OF OZ<br />
TYPE OF PROGRAM: RESIDENCY<br />
DISTRICT/ SCHOOL: IRVINGTON/IRVINGTON HIGH SCHOOL<br />
# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />
# OF STUDENTS: 50 GRADE(S) 9-12<br />
DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 9/19-11/6/11<br />
NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />
STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 X STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />
1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />
1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />
1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />
2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />
3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />
4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />
5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />
6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />
7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />
NONE<br />
8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />
NONE<br />
9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />
NONE<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
1.<br />
2.<br />
3.<br />
4.<br />
5.<br />
6.<br />
STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />
ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />
EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />
ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />
TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />
QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />
DIANA HAS BEEN DOING THE SCHOOL PLAYS FOR 16 YEARS. SHE<br />
PUTS A LOT OF HER OWN TIME AND EXPENSES IN MAKING<br />
COSTUMES FOR EACH PERFORMANCE.<br />
8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />
NONE<br />
9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />
NONE<br />
ARTIST: DIANE WENDEL<br />
CONTRACT #: A8201A<br />
TITLE OF PROGRAM: COMPUTER GRAPHIC ARTS<br />
TYPE OF PROGRAM: WORKSHOP<br />
DISTRICT/ SCHOOL: CHAPPAQUA/ROARING BROOK ELEM.<br />
# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />
# OF STUDENTS: 9 GRADE(S) 3 & 4<br />
DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 1/10-3/6/12<br />
NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />
STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 X STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />
ARTIST: DIANE WENDEL<br />
CONTRACT #: A8201B<br />
TITLE OF PROGRAM: COMPUTER GRAPHIC DESIGN<br />
TYPE OF PROGRAM: WORKSHOP<br />
DISTRICT/ SCHOOL: CHAPPAQUA/ROARING BROOK ELEM.<br />
# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />
# OF STUDENTS: 10 GRADE(S) 1 & 2<br />
DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 1/12-3/8/12<br />
NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />
STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 X STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />
1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />
1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />
1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />
2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />
3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />
4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />
5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />
6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />
4<br />
4<br />
4<br />
4<br />
4<br />
4<br />
1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />
2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />
3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />
4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />
5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />
6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />
4<br />
4<br />
4<br />
4<br />
4<br />
4<br />
7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM?<br />
DIANE IS A WONDERFUL INSTRUCTOR.<br />
Y<br />
WHY?<br />
7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />
DIANE IS A COMMITTED KNOWLEDGEABLE INSTRUCTOR.<br />
8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />
NONE<br />
9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />
NONE<br />
8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />
NONE<br />
9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />
NONE<br />
Arts in Education Service - School Evaluations <strong>2011</strong>-<strong>2012</strong><br />
Page 88 of 332
ARTIST: DIANE WENDEL<br />
CONTRACT #: A8186<br />
TITLE OF PROGRAM: THEATRE ENRICHMENT<br />
TYPE OF PROGRAM: WORKSHOP<br />
DISTRICT/ SCHOOL: CHAPPAQUA/SEVEN BRIDGES MIDDLE SCHOOL<br />
# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />
# OF STUDENTS: 97 GRADE(S) 5-8<br />
DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 1/3-2/12/12<br />
NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />
STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 X STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />
ARTIST: DINA MICHELLE SCIALLO dba DANCE EM CONTRACT #: A8036<br />
TITLE OF PROGRAM: HIP HOP<br />
TYPE OF PROGRAM: WORKSHOP<br />
DISTRICT/ SCHOOL:<br />
# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />
CHAPPAQUA/GRAFFLIN ELEM.<br />
# OF STUDENTS: 9 GRADE(S) 2-4<br />
DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 1/11-3/28/12<br />
NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />
STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 X STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4 X<br />
1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />
1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />
1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />
2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />
3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />
4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />
5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />
6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />
7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />
NONE<br />
8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />
NONE<br />
9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />
NONE<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
1.<br />
2.<br />
3.<br />
4.<br />
5.<br />
6.<br />
STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />
ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />
EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />
ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />
TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />
QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />
2<br />
2<br />
2<br />
4<br />
3<br />
3<br />
7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />
DINA WAS A BUBBLY, HAPPY AND INFLUENTIAL INSTRUCTOR BUT<br />
CURRICULUM NEEDS INSPIRATION AND NEEDS TO BE BROUGHT UP<br />
TO AGE LEVEL.<br />
8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />
PERHAPS END OF YEAR PERFORMANCE FOR PARENTS.<br />
9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />
NONE<br />
ARTIST: DJUAN JAE GRANT<br />
CONTRACT #: A8028<br />
TITLE OF PROGRAM: SOUND DESIGNER FOR JAZZ CO SHOW<br />
TYPE OF PROGRAM: RESIDENCY<br />
DISTRICT/ SCHOOL: TUCKAHOE/TUCKAHOE HIGH SCHOOL<br />
# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />
# OF STUDENTS: 60 GRADE(S) 9-12<br />
DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 2/28-3/3/12<br />
NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />
STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 X STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />
ARTIST: DONALD COOKSEY<br />
CONTRACT #: A8841<br />
TITLE OF PROGRAM: BASS PLAYER FOR THE SHOW - PETER PAN<br />
TYPE OF PROGRAM: ASSEMBLY<br />
DISTRICT/ SCHOOL: CHAPPAQUA/ROARING BROOK ELEM.<br />
# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />
# OF STUDENTS: 113 GRADE(S) 2-4<br />
DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 5/30-6/3/12<br />
NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />
STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />
1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />
1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />
1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />
2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />
3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />
4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />
5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />
6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
N/<br />
1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />
2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />
3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />
4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />
5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />
6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
N/<br />
7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />
SOUND AND LIGHTING ARE IMPORTANT IN ANY THEATRE<br />
PRODUCTION.<br />
8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />
NONE<br />
9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />
NONE<br />
7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM?<br />
NONE<br />
8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />
NONE<br />
9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />
VERY ACCOMODATING AND A PLEASURE TO WORK WITH.<br />
Y<br />
WHY?<br />
Arts in Education Service - School Evaluations <strong>2011</strong>-<strong>2012</strong><br />
Page 89 of 332
ARTIST: DONNA CAREW<br />
CONTRACT #: A8060<br />
TITLE OF PROGRAM: SCRAPBOOKING<br />
TYPE OF PROGRAM: WORKSHOP<br />
DISTRICT/ SCHOOL:<br />
# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />
PELHAM/PROSPECT HILL ELEM.<br />
# OF STUDENTS: 10 GRADE(S) 3-5<br />
DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 1/12-3/8/12<br />
NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />
STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 X STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />
1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />
ARTIST: DONNA KOVACS<br />
CONTRACT #: A8248<br />
TITLE OF PROGRAM: COSTUME DESIGNER FOR THE SHOW - THE<br />
DROWSY CHAPERONE<br />
TYPE OF PROGRAM: RESIDENCY<br />
DISTRICT/ SCHOOL: KATONAH/LEWISBORO/JOHN JAY MIDDLE SCHOOL<br />
# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />
# OF STUDENTS: 75 GRADE(S) 6-8<br />
DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 1/15-3/15/12<br />
NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />
STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 X STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />
1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />
1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />
2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />
3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />
4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />
5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />
6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />
7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />
NONE<br />
8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />
NONE<br />
9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />
NONE<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
N/<br />
1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />
2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />
3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />
4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />
5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />
6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />
7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />
DONNA'S COSTUMES WERE AMAZING. WE LOOK FORWARD TO<br />
WORKING WITH HER AGAIN.<br />
8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />
NONE<br />
9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />
NONE<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
N/<br />
ARTIST: DONNA ROSS<br />
CONTRACT #: A7610A<br />
TITLE OF PROGRAM: CARTOONING<br />
TYPE OF PROGRAM: WORKSHOP<br />
DISTRICT/ SCHOOL:<br />
# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />
PELHAM/SIWANOY ELEM.<br />
# OF STUDENTS: 15 GRADE(S) K-5<br />
DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 10/4-11/29/11<br />
NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />
STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 X STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />
ARTIST: DONNA ROSS<br />
CONTRACT #: A8357A<br />
TITLE OF PROGRAM: CARTOONING<br />
TYPE OF PROGRAM: WORKSHOP<br />
DISTRICT/ SCHOOL:<br />
# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />
PELHAM/SIWANOY ELEM.<br />
# OF STUDENTS: 11 GRADE(S) K-2<br />
DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 1/31-3/26/12<br />
NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />
STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 X STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />
1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />
1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />
1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />
2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />
3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />
4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />
5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />
6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />
2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />
3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />
4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />
5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />
6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />
4<br />
4<br />
4<br />
4<br />
4<br />
4<br />
7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM?<br />
NONE<br />
Y<br />
WHY?<br />
7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM?<br />
NONE<br />
Y<br />
WHY?<br />
8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />
NONE<br />
9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />
NONE<br />
8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />
NONE<br />
9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />
NONE<br />
Arts in Education Service - School Evaluations <strong>2011</strong>-<strong>2012</strong><br />
Page 90 of 332
ARTIST: DONNA ROSS<br />
CONTRACT #: A8357B<br />
TITLE OF PROGRAM: CLAY CREATIONS<br />
TYPE OF PROGRAM: WORKSHOP<br />
DISTRICT/ SCHOOL:<br />
# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />
PELHAM/SIWANOY ELEM.<br />
# OF STUDENTS: 11 GRADE(S) 3-5<br />
DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 2/1-4/4/12<br />
NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />
STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 X STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />
ARTIST: DONNA ROSS<br />
CONTRACT #: A8062<br />
TITLE OF PROGRAM: CLAY CREATIONS<br />
TYPE OF PROGRAM: WORKSHOP<br />
DISTRICT/ SCHOOL:<br />
# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />
PELHAM/PROSPECT HILL ELEM.<br />
# OF STUDENTS: 14 GRADE(S) K-2<br />
DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 1/13-3/9/12<br />
NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />
STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 X STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />
1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />
1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />
1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />
2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />
3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />
4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />
5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />
6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />
4<br />
4<br />
4<br />
4<br />
4<br />
4<br />
1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />
2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />
3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />
4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />
5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />
6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
N/<br />
7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM?<br />
NONE<br />
Y<br />
WHY?<br />
7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM?<br />
NONE<br />
Y<br />
WHY?<br />
8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />
NONE<br />
9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />
NONE<br />
8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />
NONE<br />
9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />
NONE<br />
ARTIST: DONNA ROSS<br />
CONTRACT #: A7610B<br />
TITLE OF PROGRAM: CLAY CREATIONS<br />
TYPE OF PROGRAM: WORKSHOP<br />
DISTRICT/ SCHOOL:<br />
# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />
PELHAM/SIWANOY ELEM.<br />
# OF STUDENTS: 10 GRADE(S) 3-5<br />
DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 10/5-11/30/11<br />
NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />
STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 X STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />
ARTIST: DOREEN RAPPAPORT<br />
CONTRACT #: A8272<br />
TITLE OF PROGRAM: AUTHOR VISIT<br />
TYPE OF PROGRAM: ASSEMBLY<br />
DISTRICT/ SCHOOL:<br />
# OF TEACHERS: 5<br />
CHAPPAQUA/GRAFFLIN ELEM.<br />
# OF STUDENTS: 114 GRADE(S) 3 & 4<br />
DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 5/3/12<br />
NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />
STANDARD 1 STANDARD 2 STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />
1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />
1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />
1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />
2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />
3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />
4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />
5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />
6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
N/<br />
N/<br />
1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />
2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />
3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />
4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />
5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />
6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />
4<br />
4<br />
4<br />
4<br />
4<br />
N/<br />
7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM?<br />
NONE<br />
Y<br />
WHY?<br />
7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM?<br />
AUTHOR INSPIRED THE STUDENTS TO WRITE.<br />
Y<br />
WHY?<br />
8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />
NONE<br />
9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />
NONE<br />
8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />
USE DOCUMENT CAMERA TO SHARE BOOKS.<br />
9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />
NONE<br />
Arts in Education Service - School Evaluations <strong>2011</strong>-<strong>2012</strong><br />
Page 91 of 332
ARTIST: DORIS HERNACKI<br />
CONTRACT #: A8853<br />
TITLE OF PROGRAM: ACCOMPANIST FOR CHORAL SHOW<br />
TYPE OF PROGRAM: ASSEMBLY<br />
DISTRICT/ SCHOOL:<br />
# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />
WHITE PLAINS/EASTVIEW MS<br />
# OF STUDENTS: 40 GRADE(S) 7<br />
DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 5/16/12<br />
NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />
STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />
ARTIST: DOROTHY CANCELLIERI<br />
CONTRACT #: A8048B<br />
TITLE OF PROGRAM: ARTS & CRAFTS / CREATIVE CREATURE<br />
TYPE OF PROGRAM: WORKSHOP<br />
DISTRICT/ SCHOOL:<br />
# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />
PELHAM/PROSPECT HILL ELEM.<br />
# OF STUDENTS: 12 GRADE(S) K-2<br />
DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 1/10-3/6/12<br />
NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />
STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 X STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />
1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />
1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />
1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />
2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />
3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />
4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />
5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />
6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />
2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />
3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />
4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />
5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />
6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
N/<br />
7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM?<br />
EVERYTHING WAS WONDERFUL.<br />
Y<br />
WHY?<br />
7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM?<br />
NONE<br />
Y<br />
WHY?<br />
8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />
NONE<br />
9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />
NONE<br />
8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />
NONE<br />
9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />
NONE<br />
ARTIST: DOROTHY CANCELLIERI<br />
CONTRACT #: A8371B<br />
TITLE OF PROGRAM: ARTS & CRAFTS / DINO ART<br />
TYPE OF PROGRAM: WORKSHOP<br />
DISTRICT/ SCHOOL:<br />
# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />
PELHAM/HUTCHINSON ELEM.<br />
# OF STUDENTS: 11 GRADE(S) K-2<br />
DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 2/10-4/5/12<br />
NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />
STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 X STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />
ARTIST: DOROTHY CANCELLIERI<br />
CONTRACT #: A8048A<br />
TITLE OF PROGRAM: ARTS & CRAFTS / DINO ART<br />
TYPE OF PROGRAM: WORKSHOP<br />
DISTRICT/ SCHOOL:<br />
# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />
PELHAM/PROSPECT HILL ELEM.<br />
# OF STUDENTS: 9 GRADE(S) K-2<br />
DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 1/9-3/12/12<br />
NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />
STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 X STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />
1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />
1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />
1.<br />
2.<br />
3.<br />
4.<br />
5.<br />
6.<br />
STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />
ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />
EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />
ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />
TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />
QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />
STUDENTS LOVE TAKING THIS CLASS. DOROTHY IS A PLEASURE<br />
TO WORK WITH.<br />
8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />
NONE<br />
9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />
NONE<br />
1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />
2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />
3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />
4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />
5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />
6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />
7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />
NONE<br />
8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />
NONE<br />
9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />
NONE<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
N/<br />
Arts in Education Service - School Evaluations <strong>2011</strong>-<strong>2012</strong><br />
Page 92 of 332
ARTIST: DOROTHY CANCELLIERI<br />
CONTRACT #: A8371A<br />
TITLE OF PROGRAM: TRANSPORTATION ART & CRAFTS<br />
TYPE OF PROGRAM: WORKSHOP<br />
DISTRICT/ SCHOOL:<br />
# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />
PELHAM/HUTCHINSON ELEM.<br />
# OF STUDENTS: 10 GRADE(S) K-2<br />
DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 2/9-4/4/12<br />
NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />
STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 X STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />
ARTIST: DOUGLAS CORRELLUS<br />
CONTRACT #: A8114A<br />
TITLE OF PROGRAM: BIG BAND JAZZ LIVE CONCERT<br />
TYPE OF PROGRAM: ASSEMBLY<br />
DISTRICT/ SCHOOL:<br />
# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />
OSSINING/CLAREMONT ELEM.<br />
# OF STUDENTS: 705 GRADE(S) 3 & 4<br />
DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 12/22/11<br />
NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />
STANDARD 1 STANDARD 2 STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4 X<br />
1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />
1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />
1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />
2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />
3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />
4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />
5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />
6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />
7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />
DOROTHY IS A PLEASURE TO WORK WITH. SHE HAS A WELL<br />
THOUGHT OUT AND EXECUTED PROGRAM.<br />
8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />
NONE<br />
9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />
NONE<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
1.<br />
2.<br />
3.<br />
4.<br />
5.<br />
6.<br />
STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />
ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />
EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />
ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />
TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />
QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />
A GREAT PRESENTATION OF "BIG BAND" ERA MUSIC. STUDENTS<br />
WERE ENGAGED AND LEARNED TO APPRECIATE THE COLLECTIVE<br />
EFFORT AND INDIVIDUAL CONTRIBUTION OF SELECTED MUSICIANS<br />
AND THEIR INSTRUMENTS.<br />
8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />
NONE<br />
9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />
WOULD LOVE TO HAVE THEM RETURN NEXT YEAR.<br />
ARTIST: DOUGLAS CORRELLUS<br />
CONTRACT #: A8114B<br />
TITLE OF PROGRAM: BIG BAND JAZZ LIVE CONCERT<br />
TYPE OF PROGRAM: ASSEMBLY<br />
DISTRICT/ SCHOOL:<br />
# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />
OSSINING/BROOKSIDE ELEM.<br />
# OF STUDENTS: 750 GRADE(S) 1 & 2<br />
DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 12/22/11<br />
NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />
STANDARD 1 STANDARD 2 STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4 X<br />
ARTIST: DOUGLAS FLORIAN<br />
CONTRACT #: A8188<br />
TITLE OF PROGRAM: AUTHOR/ILLUSTRATOR VISIT<br />
TYPE OF PROGRAM: ASSEMBLY<br />
DISTRICT/ SCHOOL:<br />
# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />
TUCKAHOE/W. E. COTTLE ELEM.<br />
# OF STUDENTS: GRADE(S) K-5<br />
DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 3/13/12<br />
NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />
STANDARD 1 STANDARD 2 STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />
1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />
1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />
1.<br />
2.<br />
3.<br />
4.<br />
5.<br />
6.<br />
STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />
ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />
EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />
ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />
TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />
QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />
FABULOUS OPPORTUNITY FOR OUR STUDENTS TO SEE FIRST RATE<br />
JAZZ.<br />
8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />
NONE<br />
9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />
THANKS.<br />
1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />
2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />
3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />
4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />
5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />
6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />
7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />
EXCITING.<br />
8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />
NONE<br />
9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />
NONE<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
Arts in Education Service - School Evaluations <strong>2011</strong>-<strong>2012</strong><br />
Page 93 of 332
ARTIST: DOUGLAS FLORIAN<br />
CONTRACT #: A8573<br />
TITLE OF PROGRAM: AUTHOR/ILLUSTRATOR VISIT<br />
TYPE OF PROGRAM: ASSEMBLY<br />
DISTRICT/ SCHOOL:<br />
# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />
OSSINING/BROOKSIDE ELEM.<br />
# OF STUDENTS: 300 GRADE(S) 1 & 2<br />
DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 3/30/12<br />
NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />
STANDARD 1 STANDARD 2 STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />
ARTIST: DOUGLAS FLORIAN<br />
CONTRACT #: A8835<br />
TITLE OF PROGRAM: POETRY & ILLUSTRATION<br />
TYPE OF PROGRAM: ASSEMBLY<br />
DISTRICT/ SCHOOL:<br />
# OF TEACHERS: 3<br />
PELHAM/HUTCHINSON ELEM.<br />
# OF STUDENTS: 400 GRADE(S) K-5<br />
DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 5/9/12<br />
NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />
STANDARD 1 STANDARD 2 STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />
1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />
1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />
1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />
2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />
3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />
4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />
5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />
6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />
7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />
4<br />
4<br />
3<br />
4<br />
3<br />
N/<br />
THE PRESENTATION WAS INTERESTING AND ENGAGING. THE<br />
STUDENTS ENJOYED MEETING AN AUTHOR OF BOOKS THEY ENJOY<br />
READING.<br />
8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />
THE PACE OF THE ASSEMBLY WAS VERY FAST, MANY STUDENTS<br />
SEEMED TO GET LOST QUICKLY.<br />
9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />
POSSIBLY SMALLER GROUPS WOULD HAVE BEEN BETTER.<br />
ARTIST: DOUGLAS PULLEN<br />
CONTRACT #: A7671<br />
TITLE OF PROGRAM: BACH TO BEATLES MUSICAL SHOW<br />
TYPE OF PROGRAM: ASSEMBLY<br />
DISTRICT/ SCHOOL:<br />
BREWSTER/JFK ELEM.<br />
# OF TEACHERS: 6<br />
# OF STUDENTS: GRADE(S) K-3<br />
DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE<br />
1/5/12<br />
NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />
STANDARD 1 STANDARD 2 STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4 X<br />
1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />
1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />
2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />
3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />
4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />
5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />
6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />
7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />
DOUG WAS VERY EASY TO WORK WITH AND WAS WELL<br />
PREPARED. THE CHILDREN WERE ENGAGED. PARTICIPATION WAS<br />
GREAT.<br />
8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />
OUR SCHOOL HAS A LARGE SPECIAL ED. PROGRAM AND SOME<br />
TEACHERS THOUGHT HE SPOKE TOO FAST. I THOUGHT THIS WAS<br />
OK. IT KEPT THE CHILDREN ON THEIR TOES.<br />
9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />
ARTIST:<br />
IN THE FIFTH GRADER WORKSHOP THE STUDENTS PRODUCED A<br />
POEM AND ILLUSTRATION.<br />
EDUARDO NAVAS<br />
CONTRACT #: A8456<br />
TITLE OF PROGRAM: SCARAMOUCHES LATINO PUPPET THEATRE - HOW<br />
TO MAKE A PUPPET<br />
TYPE OF PROGRAM: WORKSHOP<br />
DISTRICT/ SCHOOL:<br />
NEW ROCHELLE/DAVIS ELEM. SCHOOL<br />
# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />
# OF STUDENTS: 125 GRADE(S) 1<br />
DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE<br />
4/26/12<br />
NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />
STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 X STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4 X<br />
1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />
2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />
3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />
4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />
5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />
6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />
7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />
A LITTLE DIFFICULT TO SIT THROUGH.<br />
8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />
CHANGE PROGRAM TO FIT AGE LEVEL.<br />
9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />
NONE<br />
3.5<br />
3.5<br />
3.5<br />
4<br />
4<br />
4<br />
1.<br />
2.<br />
3.<br />
4.<br />
5.<br />
6.<br />
STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />
ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />
EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />
ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />
TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />
QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />
THE ARTISTS WERE WONDERFUL. EDUARDO WAS EXTREMELY<br />
WELL PREPARED WITH ALL THE MATERIALS. HIS MANNER WAS<br />
CALM, HE WAS GRACIOUS WITH ALL THE CHILDREN. HE HELPED<br />
THEM PERFORM WITH THEIR PUPPETS.<br />
8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />
NONE<br />
9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />
TRULY EXCELLENT.<br />
Arts in Education Service - School Evaluations <strong>2011</strong>-<strong>2012</strong><br />
Page 94 of 332
ARTIST: EDUCATION IN DANCE & THE RELATED<br />
CONTRACT #: A8412<br />
TITLE OF PROGRAM: JO FREDERIKSEN - INTEGRATED DANCE, MUSIC &<br />
THE ARTS<br />
TYPE OF PROGRAM: ASSEMBLY/RESIDENCY<br />
DISTRICT/ SCHOOL: WHITE PLAINS/MAMARONECK AVENUE ELEM. ELEM.<br />
# OF TEACHERS: 5<br />
# OF STUDENTS: 100 GRADE(S) 1<br />
DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 6/13/12<br />
NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />
STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 X STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4 X<br />
1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />
ARTIST: EDUCATIONAL PRODUCTION<br />
CONTRACT #: A8031<br />
TITLE OF PROGRAM: JAMES VAGIAS - THE WINTER HOLIDAY EXPRESS<br />
TYPE OF PROGRAM: ASSEMBLY<br />
DISTRICT/ SCHOOL:<br />
# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />
YORKTOWN/BROOKSIDE ELEM.<br />
# OF STUDENTS: 300 GRADE(S) K-3<br />
DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 12/19/11<br />
NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />
STANDARD 1 STANDARD 2 STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4 X<br />
1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />
1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />
2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />
3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />
4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />
5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />
6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />
7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />
THIS IS A WONDERFUL PROGRAM.<br />
8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />
NONE<br />
9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />
THE CHILDREN LEARNED A LOT AND HAD A VERY GOOD TIME.<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
1.<br />
2.<br />
3.<br />
4.<br />
5.<br />
6.<br />
STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />
ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />
EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />
ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />
TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />
QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />
4<br />
4<br />
4<br />
3<br />
4<br />
N/<br />
7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />
ARTIST WAS KNOWLEDGABLE AND ENGAGED THE CHILDREN.<br />
EMPHASIS WAS MORE ON READING, FULFILLING DREAMS, GIVING<br />
AND SHARING NOT SIMPLY ON WINTER HOLIDAYS.<br />
8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />
IF POSSIBLE ALLOW TIME FOR CHILDREN TO ASK QUESITONS.<br />
9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />
LOVED THE SHOW. WOULD HIGHLY RECOMMEND THIS ARTIST.<br />
ARTIST: EDUCATIONAL PRODUCTION<br />
CONTRACT #: A7762<br />
TITLE OF PROGRAM: JAMES VAGIAS - THE WINTER HOLIDAY EXPRESS<br />
TYPE OF PROGRAM: ASSEMBLY<br />
DISTRICT/ SCHOOL:<br />
# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />
CROTON/CET ELEM.<br />
# OF STUDENTS: 620 GRADE(S) K-4<br />
DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 11/15/11<br />
NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />
STANDARD 1 STANDARD 2 STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4 X<br />
ARTIST: EDWARD "TED" SCHEU<br />
CONTRACT #: A8135<br />
TITLE OF PROGRAM: POETRY AUTHOR<br />
TYPE OF PROGRAM: ASSEMBLY<br />
DISTRICT/ SCHOOL: CHAPPAQUA/WESTORCHARD ELEM.<br />
# OF TEACHERS: 5<br />
# OF STUDENTS: 102 GRADE(S) 1<br />
DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 4/12/12<br />
NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />
STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 X STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />
1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />
1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />
1.<br />
2.<br />
3.<br />
4.<br />
5.<br />
6.<br />
STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />
ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />
EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />
ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />
TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />
QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />
HE IS AN EXCELLENT PERFORMER. HE KNOWS HOW TO PRESENT<br />
TO CHILDREN TO KEEP THEIR INTERESTS AND TO EDUCATE THEM.<br />
8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />
NONE<br />
9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />
HE IS FUN AND UPBEAT AND VERY ENGAGING. BOTH STUDENTS<br />
AND FACULTY WERE WOWED BY HIM.<br />
1.<br />
2.<br />
3.<br />
4.<br />
5.<br />
6.<br />
STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />
ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />
EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />
ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />
TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />
QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
4<br />
N/<br />
7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />
MR. SCHEU WAS FABULOUS. WE ALL AGREED THAT THE<br />
CHILDREN WERE SO ENGAGED AND THE INTERACTIVE PIECE WAS<br />
8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />
NONE<br />
9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />
WE WOULD LOVE TO HAVE HIM AGAIN. IT WAS WONDERFUL.<br />
Arts in Education Service - School Evaluations <strong>2011</strong>-<strong>2012</strong><br />
Page 95 of 332
ARTIST: EDWARD "TED" SCHEU<br />
CONTRACT #: A8758<br />
TITLE OF PROGRAM: POETRY GUY<br />
TYPE OF PROGRAM: ASSEMBLY/WORKSHOP<br />
DISTRICT/ SCHOOL: KATONAH/LEWISBORO/INCREASE MILLER ELEM.<br />
# OF TEACHERS: 3<br />
# OF STUDENTS: 22 GRADE(S) 2<br />
DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 3/29/12<br />
NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />
STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 X STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />
ARTIST: EDWARD "TED" SCHEU<br />
CONTRACT #: A8825<br />
TITLE OF PROGRAM: POETRY GUY<br />
TYPE OF PROGRAM: RESIDENCY<br />
DISTRICT/ SCHOOL: EASTCHESTER/ANNE HUTCHINSON ELEM.<br />
# OF TEACHERS: 4<br />
# OF STUDENTS: 100 GRADE(S) 4<br />
DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 6/5-6/12<br />
NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />
STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 X STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />
1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />
1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />
1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />
2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />
3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />
4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />
5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />
6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />
7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />
TED IS A WONDERFUL PRESENTER. VERY STUDENT FRIENDLY.<br />
8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />
NONE<br />
9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />
ADDITION OF WORD BANK WAS APPRECIATED. TIMING WAS<br />
EFFICIENT AND WELL PLANNED. THANKS FOR THE "GIFT" BOOKS<br />
BEFORE THE SHOW AND THANKS FOR BRINGING YOUR OWN<br />
SOUND SYSTEM.<br />
4<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
4<br />
1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />
2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />
3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />
4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />
5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />
6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />
7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />
TED IS A 5 STAR POET TEACHER. HE RELATES EXCEPTIONALLY<br />
WELL TO STUDENTS AND REALLY MOTIVATES THEM.<br />
8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />
HE IS JUST ABOUT PERFECT IN MY EYES.<br />
9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />
NONE<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
ARTIST: EDWARD "TED" SCHEU<br />
CONTRACT #: A8244<br />
TITLE OF PROGRAM: POETRY GUY<br />
TYPE OF PROGRAM: ASSEMBLY/WORKSHOP<br />
DISTRICT/ SCHOOL: KATONAH/LEWISBORO/LEWISBORO ELEM.<br />
# OF TEACHERS: 4<br />
# OF STUDENTS: 72 GRADE(S) 2<br />
DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 4/13/12<br />
NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />
STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 X STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />
ARTIST: EDWARD "TED" SCHEU<br />
CONTRACT #: A8519<br />
TITLE OF PROGRAM: POETRY GUY<br />
TYPE OF PROGRAM: ASSEMBLY/WORKSHOP<br />
DISTRICT/ SCHOOL: PLEASANTVILLE/BEDFORD ROAD ELEM.<br />
# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />
# OF STUDENTS: 117 GRADE(S) 2<br />
DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 3/22/12<br />
NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />
STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 X STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />
1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />
1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />
1.<br />
2.<br />
3.<br />
4.<br />
5.<br />
6.<br />
STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />
ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />
EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />
ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />
TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />
QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />
TED IS GENUINELY INTERESTED IN HELPING THE CHILDREN LOVE<br />
POETRY. THEY ALL ENJOYED THE DAY.<br />
8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />
NONE<br />
9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />
THANK YOU.<br />
1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />
2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />
3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />
4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />
5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />
6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />
7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />
I USE THIS PROGRAM AS A KICK OFF FOR MY POETRY UNIT.<br />
8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />
TED SHOULD ILLUSTRATE HIS BOOKS, HE IS VERY TALENTED.<br />
9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />
I'M LOOKING FORWARD TO NEXT YEAR ALREADY.<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
Arts in Education Service - School Evaluations <strong>2011</strong>-<strong>2012</strong><br />
Page 96 of 332
ARTIST: EDWARD "TED" SCHEU<br />
CONTRACT #: A8558<br />
TITLE OF PROGRAM: POETRY GUY<br />
TYPE OF PROGRAM: ASSEMBLY<br />
DISTRICT/ SCHOOL:<br />
# OF TEACHERS: 4<br />
LAKELAND/LINCOLN-TITUS ELEM.<br />
# OF STUDENTS: 90 GRADE(S) 3<br />
DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 5/9/12<br />
NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />
STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />
ARTIST: EDWARD "TED" SCHEU<br />
CONTRACT #: A8340<br />
TITLE OF PROGRAM: POETRY GUY<br />
TYPE OF PROGRAM: RESIDENCY<br />
DISTRICT/ SCHOOL:<br />
# OF TEACHERS: 4<br />
CHAPPAQUA/GRAFFLIN ELEM.<br />
# OF STUDENTS: 78 GRADE(S) K & 1<br />
DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 4/19 & 20/12<br />
NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />
STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 X STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />
1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />
1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />
1.<br />
2.<br />
3.<br />
4.<br />
5.<br />
6.<br />
STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />
ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />
EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />
ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />
TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />
QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />
WE ALWAYS TELL OTHER EDUCATORS WHAT A WONDERFUL JOB<br />
HE DOES WITH THE CHILDREN. HE IS CREATIVE, WITTY AND KEEPS<br />
THE STUDENTS INVOLVED.<br />
8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />
NONE<br />
9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />
NONE<br />
ARTIST: EDWARD "TED" SCHEU<br />
TITLE OF PROGRAM: POETRY GUY<br />
TYPE OF PROGRAM: RESIDENCY<br />
DISTRICT/ SCHOOL:<br />
CONTRACT #: A8326<br />
EASTCHESTER/ANNE HUTCHINSON ELEM.<br />
# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />
# OF STUDENTS: 24 GRADE(S) 2<br />
DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE<br />
2/6-9/12<br />
NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />
STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 X STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />
1.<br />
2.<br />
3.<br />
4.<br />
5.<br />
6.<br />
STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />
ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />
EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />
ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />
TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />
QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />
TED'S PRESENTATION AND WORKSHOPS WERE THE PERFECT<br />
COMPANION TO OUR POETRY UNIT. HE IS FUN, ENGAGING,<br />
TALENTED AND WITTY. THE CHILDREN AND TEACHERS LOVED HIM.<br />
8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />
NONE<br />
9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />
NONE<br />
ARTIST: EDWARD "TED" SCHEU<br />
CONTRACT #: A7512<br />
TITLE OF PROGRAM: POETRY GUY<br />
TYPE OF PROGRAM: RESIDENCY<br />
DISTRICT/ SCHOOL: KATONAH/LEWISBORO/KATONAH ELEM. SCHOOL<br />
# OF TEACHERS: 8<br />
# OF STUDENTS: 150 GRADE(S) 2 & 3<br />
DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 1/11-13/12<br />
NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />
STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 X STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4 X<br />
1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />
1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />
1.<br />
2.<br />
3.<br />
4.<br />
5.<br />
6.<br />
STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />
ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />
EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />
ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />
TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />
QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />
5<br />
4<br />
5<br />
5<br />
4<br />
4<br />
7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />
VERY ENERGETIC AND THE STUDENTS LOVED HIM. GREAT POEMS<br />
ARE CREATED BY THE STUDENTS.<br />
8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />
MORE ON THE PROCESS GOING BACK TO EDIT-ADD-DELETE, ETC.<br />
9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />
THANKS FOR THE BOOK.<br />
1.<br />
2.<br />
3.<br />
4.<br />
5.<br />
6.<br />
STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />
ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />
EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />
ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />
TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />
QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />
TED IS MAGICAL. HE TURNS STUDENTS INTO CREATIVE WRITERS<br />
AND LOVERS OF POETRY IN A MATTER OF MINUTES.<br />
8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />
NONE.<br />
9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />
IT IS ALWAYS AN ABSOLUTE PLEASURE TO HOST TED. HE'S A<br />
CELEBRITY - - BETTER THAN A ROCK STAR. KEEP THE MAGIC,<br />
CHARM, AND HUMOR. WE CAN'T WAIT TO SEE YOUR NEW WEBSITE.<br />
Arts in Education Service - School Evaluations <strong>2011</strong>-<strong>2012</strong><br />
Page 97 of 332
ARTIST: EDWARD "TED" SCHEU<br />
CONTRACT #: A7570A<br />
TITLE OF PROGRAM: POETRY GUY<br />
TYPE OF PROGRAM: WORKSHOP<br />
DISTRICT/ SCHOOL: EASTCHESTER/GREENVALE ELEM.<br />
# OF TEACHERS: 7<br />
# OF STUDENTS: 146 GRADE(S) 2<br />
DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 3/6 & 7/12<br />
NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />
STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 X STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />
ARTIST: EDWARD DURKEE<br />
CONTRACT #: A8268<br />
TITLE OF PROGRAM: SCULPTING<br />
TYPE OF PROGRAM: WORKSHOP<br />
DISTRICT/ SCHOOL:<br />
# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />
NORTH SALEM/PQ ELEM.<br />
# OF STUDENTS: 9 GRADE(S) K-2<br />
DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 1/26-3/29/12<br />
NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />
STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 X STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />
1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />
1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />
1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />
2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />
3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />
4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />
5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />
6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />
7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />
MR. SCHEU IS EXCEPTIONAL WITH THE STUDENTS. HE TEACHES<br />
THE STUDENTS TO WRITE IN A VERY DESCRIPTIVE FASHION.<br />
8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />
NONE<br />
9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />
NONE<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />
2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />
3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />
4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />
5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />
6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />
7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />
NONE<br />
8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />
NONE<br />
9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />
NONE<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
ARTIST: EDWARD DURKEE<br />
CONTRACT #: A8815<br />
TITLE OF PROGRAM: SCULPTING ART ADVENTURES<br />
TYPE OF PROGRAM: WORKSHOP<br />
DISTRICT/ SCHOOL:<br />
# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />
NORTH SALEM/PQ ELEM.<br />
# OF STUDENTS: 9 GRADE(S) K-5<br />
DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 4/20-6/8/12<br />
NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />
STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 X STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />
1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />
ARTIST: EDWARD XIQUES<br />
CONTRACT #: A8649<br />
TITLE OF PROGRAM: SAXIPHONE PLAYER FOR THE SHOW - A FUNNY<br />
THING HAPPENED ON THE WAY TO THE FORUM<br />
TYPE OF PROGRAM: ASSEMBLY<br />
DISTRICT/ SCHOOL: PUTNAM VALLEY/PUTNAM VALLEY HIGH SCHOOL<br />
# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />
# OF STUDENTS: 400 GRADE(S) 9-12<br />
DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 4/13-23/12<br />
NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />
STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />
1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />
1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />
2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />
3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />
4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />
5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />
6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />
7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />
NONE<br />
8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />
NONE<br />
9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />
NONE<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />
2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />
3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />
4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />
5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />
6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />
7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />
NONE<br />
8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />
NONE<br />
9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />
NONE<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
Arts in Education Service - School Evaluations <strong>2011</strong>-<strong>2012</strong><br />
Page 98 of 332
ARTIST: ELIZABETH BRESLIN<br />
CONTRACT #: A8290<br />
TITLE OF PROGRAM: CREATIVE DRAMA<br />
TYPE OF PROGRAM: WORKSHOP<br />
DISTRICT/ SCHOOL: KATONAH/LEWISBORO/KATONAH ELEM. SCHOOL<br />
# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />
# OF STUDENTS: 10 GRADE(S) K-2<br />
DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 1/20-3/16/12<br />
NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />
STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 X STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />
ARTIST: ELIZABETH BRESLIN<br />
CONTRACT #: A7558<br />
TITLE OF PROGRAM: CREATIVE DRAMA<br />
TYPE OF PROGRAM: WORKSHOP<br />
DISTRICT/ SCHOOL: KATONAH/LEWISBORO/KATONAH ELEM. SCHOOL<br />
# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />
# OF STUDENTS: 9 GRADE(S) K-2<br />
DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 9/27-11/15/11<br />
NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />
STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 X STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />
1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />
1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />
1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />
2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />
3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />
4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />
5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />
6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />
7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />
NONE<br />
8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />
NONE<br />
9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />
NONE<br />
4<br />
4<br />
4<br />
4<br />
4<br />
4<br />
1.<br />
2.<br />
3.<br />
4.<br />
5.<br />
6.<br />
STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />
ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />
EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />
ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />
TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />
QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />
5<br />
5<br />
4<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />
CHILDREN REALLY ENJOYED THIS EDUCATIONAL AND FUN CLASS.<br />
8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />
NONE<br />
9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />
NONE<br />
ARTIST: ELIZABETH FEAR<br />
CONTRACT #: A8361<br />
TITLE OF PROGRAM: ART & CULTURE OF YOGA<br />
TYPE OF PROGRAM: WORKSHOP<br />
DISTRICT/ SCHOOL:<br />
# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />
PELHAM/SIWANOY ELEM.<br />
# OF STUDENTS: 9 GRADE(S) K-2<br />
DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 2/2-3/29/12<br />
NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />
STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 X STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4 X<br />
ARTIST: ELIZABETH FEAR<br />
CONTRACT #: A7612<br />
TITLE OF PROGRAM: ART & CULTURE OF YOGA<br />
TYPE OF PROGRAM: WORKSHOP<br />
DISTRICT/ SCHOOL:<br />
# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />
PELHAM/SIWANOY ELEM.<br />
# OF STUDENTS: 8 GRADE(S) K-2<br />
DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 10/6-12/1/11<br />
NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />
STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 X STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4 X<br />
1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />
1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />
1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />
2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />
3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />
4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />
5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />
6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
N/<br />
1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />
2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />
3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />
4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />
5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />
6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM?<br />
NONE<br />
Y<br />
WHY?<br />
7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM?<br />
NONE<br />
Y<br />
WHY?<br />
8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />
NONE<br />
9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />
NONE<br />
8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />
NONE<br />
9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />
NONE<br />
Arts in Education Service - School Evaluations <strong>2011</strong>-<strong>2012</strong><br />
Page 99 of 332
ARTIST: ELIZABETH LEVY<br />
CONTRACT #: A7744<br />
TITLE OF PROGRAM: AUTHOR VISIT<br />
TYPE OF PROGRAM: ASSEMBLY<br />
DISTRICT/ SCHOOL: KATONAH/LEWISBORO/KATONAH ELEM. SCHOOL<br />
# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />
# OF STUDENTS: 93 GRADE(S) 5<br />
DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 10/25/11<br />
NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />
STANDARD 1 STANDARD 2 STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />
ARTIST: ELIZABETH McNAMARA<br />
CONTRACT #: A8021<br />
TITLE OF PROGRAM: IRISH STEP DANCING<br />
TYPE OF PROGRAM: WORKSHOP<br />
DISTRICT/ SCHOOL: TUCKAHOE/TUCKAHOE HIGH SCHOOL<br />
# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />
# OF STUDENTS: 60 GRADE(S) 9-12<br />
DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 11/28/11-3/3/12<br />
NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />
STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 X STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4 X<br />
1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />
1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />
1.<br />
2.<br />
3.<br />
4.<br />
5.<br />
6.<br />
STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />
ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />
EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />
ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />
TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />
QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />
LIZ WAS GREAT. SHE USED A LOT OF AUDIENCE PARTICIPATION,<br />
SHE EXPLAINED HOW WRITERS GET IDEAS FROM THEIR DAILY<br />
LIVES. SHE HAD WONDERFUL STORIES TO TELL ABOUT PREVIOUS<br />
WRITERS. SHE FOCUSED ON THEIR IMPORTANCE OF DETAIL IN<br />
WRITING. SHE MADE HER DISCUSSION TO THE CLASS VERY<br />
RELEVANT.<br />
8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />
NONE<br />
9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />
WE WOULD DEFINITELY HAVE HER BACK.<br />
ARTIST: ELIZABETH ROCKWELL ALCORN CONTRACT #: A8590<br />
TITLE OF PROGRAM: AUTHOR VISIT<br />
TYPE OF PROGRAM: WORKSHOP<br />
DISTRICT/ SCHOOL:<br />
# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />
TARRYTOWN/W. L. MORSE ELEM.<br />
# OF STUDENTS: 200 GRADE(S) 2<br />
DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 4/25-26/12<br />
NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />
STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />
1.<br />
2.<br />
3.<br />
4.<br />
5.<br />
6.<br />
STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />
ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />
EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />
ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />
TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />
QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />
DANCE IS FUN, CULTURAL, EDUCATIONAL AND PHYSICALLY ACTIVE.<br />
8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />
NONE<br />
9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />
VERY ORGANIZED AND TALENTED.<br />
ARTIST: ELLEN A. FLAKS<br />
TITLE OF PROGRAM: KIDS ON THE BLOCK<br />
TYPE OF PROGRAM: ASSEMBLY<br />
DISTRICT/ SCHOOL:<br />
NEW ROCHELLE/DAVIS ELEM. SCHOOL<br />
CONTRACT #: A8448A<br />
# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />
# OF STUDENTS: 125 GRADE(S) 3<br />
DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 2/27/12<br />
NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />
STANDARD 1 STANDARD 2 STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />
1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />
1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />
1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />
2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />
3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />
4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />
5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />
6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />
7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />
HER PRESENTATIONS WERE EXCELLENT. THE STUDENTS WERE<br />
ENGAGED THE ENTIRE VISIT.<br />
8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />
NONE<br />
9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />
ALL CLASSROOM TEACHERS RAVED ABOUT HER EXPERTISE AND<br />
REQUESTED THAT SHE RETURN NEXT YEAR.<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
1.<br />
2.<br />
3.<br />
4.<br />
5.<br />
6.<br />
STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />
ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />
EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />
ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />
TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />
QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />
IT IS AN EXCELLENT TOOL FOR TEACHING TOLERANCE, KINDNESS<br />
AND RESPECT.<br />
8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />
NONE<br />
9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />
NONE<br />
Arts in Education Service - School Evaluations <strong>2011</strong>-<strong>2012</strong><br />
Page 100 of 332
ARTIST: ELLEN A. FLAKS<br />
CONTRACT #: A8121A<br />
TITLE OF PROGRAM: KIDS ON THE BLOCK<br />
TYPE OF PROGRAM: ASSEMBLY<br />
DISTRICT/ SCHOOL: KATONAH/LEWISBORO/KATONAH ELEM. SCHOOL<br />
# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />
# OF STUDENTS: GRADE(S) 3<br />
DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 3/8/12<br />
NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />
STANDARD 1 STANDARD 2 STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />
ARTIST: ELLEN FLAKS<br />
CONTRACT #: A7810<br />
TITLE OF PROGRAM: KIDS ON THE BLOCK<br />
TYPE OF PROGRAM: ASSEMBLY<br />
DISTRICT/ SCHOOL:<br />
# OF TEACHERS: 5<br />
CHAPPAQUA/GRAFFLIN ELEM.<br />
# OF STUDENTS: 105 GRADE(S) 3<br />
DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 5/4/12<br />
NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />
STANDARD 1 STANDARD 2 STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />
1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />
1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />
1.<br />
2.<br />
3.<br />
4.<br />
5.<br />
6.<br />
STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />
ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />
EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />
ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />
TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />
QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />
THIS PROGRAM WAS AN EXCELLENT WAY TO INTEGRATE A<br />
DISCUSSION ON LEARNING DIFFERENCES AND ACCEPTANCE WITH<br />
OUR CLASSES.<br />
8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />
NONE<br />
9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />
GREAT PRESENTATION. I LIKED THE ADDITION OF<br />
COMPREHENSION QUESTIONS FOLLOWING THE SHOW. THE<br />
STUDENTS REALLY SEEMED TO ENJOY BEING ABLE TO PROCESS.<br />
1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />
2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />
3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />
4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />
5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />
6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />
7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />
STUDENTS LEARNED A LOT FROM THIS PRESENTATION.<br />
8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />
NONE<br />
9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />
NONE<br />
5<br />
4<br />
5<br />
5<br />
4<br />
5<br />
ARTIST: ELLEN FLAKS<br />
CONTRACT #: A7670A<br />
TITLE OF PROGRAM: KIDS ON THE BLOCK<br />
TYPE OF PROGRAM: ASSEMBLY<br />
DISTRICT/ SCHOOL:<br />
# OF TEACHERS: 5<br />
BREWSTER/JFK ELEM.<br />
# OF STUDENTS: GRADE(S) 3<br />
DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 11/18/11<br />
NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />
STANDARD 1 STANDARD 2 STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />
ARTIST: ELLEN SAMPLE<br />
CONTRACT #: A7616B<br />
TITLE OF PROGRAM: ARTS & CRAFTS<br />
TYPE OF PROGRAM: WORKSHOP<br />
DISTRICT/ SCHOOL:<br />
# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />
PELHAM/HUTCHINSON ELEM.<br />
# OF STUDENTS: 7 GRADE(S) K-2<br />
DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 10/14-12/9/11<br />
NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />
STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 X STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />
1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />
1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />
1.<br />
2.<br />
3.<br />
4.<br />
5.<br />
6.<br />
STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />
ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />
EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />
ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />
TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />
QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />
GREAT SHOW IN A CHILD FRIENDLY MANNER WITH A WONDERFUL<br />
MESSAGE.<br />
8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />
NONE<br />
9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />
NONE<br />
1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />
2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />
3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />
4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />
5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />
6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />
7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />
ELLEN IS A PLEASURE TO WORK WITH. SHE IS ORGANIZED,<br />
PREPARED AND ALWAYS PUNCTUAL.<br />
8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />
NONE<br />
9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />
NONE<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
Arts in Education Service - School Evaluations <strong>2011</strong>-<strong>2012</strong><br />
Page 101 of 332
ARTIST: ELLEN SAMPLE<br />
CONTRACT #: A8375A<br />
TITLE OF PROGRAM: ARTS & CRAFTS<br />
TYPE OF PROGRAM: WORKSHOP<br />
DISTRICT/ SCHOOL:<br />
# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />
PELHAM/HUTCHINSON ELEM.<br />
# OF STUDENTS: 11 GRADE(S) K-2<br />
DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 2/9-4/5/12<br />
NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />
STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 X STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />
ARTIST: ELLEN SAMPLE<br />
CONTRACT #: A8375B<br />
TITLE OF PROGRAM: SEWING WITH FLEECE<br />
TYPE OF PROGRAM: WORKSHOP<br />
DISTRICT/ SCHOOL:<br />
# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />
PELHAM/HUTCHINSON ELEM.<br />
# OF STUDENTS: 10 GRADE(S) 3-5<br />
DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 2/14-4/3/12<br />
NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />
STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 X STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />
1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />
1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />
1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />
2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />
3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />
4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />
5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />
6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />
7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />
THIS CLASS CONTINUES TO BE ONE OF THE MOST POPULAR<br />
CHOICES FOR THE STUDENTS.<br />
8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />
NONE<br />
9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />
NONE<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
1.<br />
2.<br />
3.<br />
4.<br />
5.<br />
6.<br />
STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />
ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />
EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />
ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />
TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />
QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />
ELLEN IS WELL ORGANIZED. SHE IS A PLEASURE TO WORK WITH.<br />
8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />
NONE<br />
9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />
NONE<br />
ARTIST: ELLEN SAMPLE<br />
CONTRACT #: A7616A<br />
TITLE OF PROGRAM: SEWING WITH FLEECE<br />
TYPE OF PROGRAM: WORKSHOP<br />
DISTRICT/ SCHOOL:<br />
# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />
PELHAM/HUTCHINSON ELEM.<br />
# OF STUDENTS: 7 GRADE(S) 3-5<br />
DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 10/11-11/22/11<br />
NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />
STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 X STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />
ARTIST: ELLEN TESITORE<br />
CONTRACT #: A8274<br />
TITLE OF PROGRAM: ARCHITECTURE OF NEW YORK CITY<br />
TYPE OF PROGRAM: RESIDENCY<br />
DISTRICT/ SCHOOL: DOBBS FERRY/SPRINGHURST ELEM.<br />
# OF TEACHERS: 6<br />
# OF STUDENTS: 125 GRADE(S) 2<br />
DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 2/27-3/23/12<br />
NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />
STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 X STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4 X<br />
1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />
1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />
1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />
2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />
3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />
4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />
5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />
6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />
7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />
ELLEN IS A PLEASURE TO WORK WITH. SHE IS ORGANIZED,<br />
PREPARED AND ALWAYS PUNCTUAL.<br />
8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />
NONE<br />
9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />
NONE<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
1.<br />
2.<br />
3.<br />
4.<br />
5.<br />
6.<br />
STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />
ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />
EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />
ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />
TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />
QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
N/<br />
N/<br />
7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />
ELLEN IS A WONDERFUL ARTIST AND EDUCATOR. SHE TALKED TO<br />
THE CHILDREN ABOUT THE DESIGN OF MANY FAMOUS NYC<br />
BUILDINGS. THEN WITH HER GUIDANCE, THEY CREATED MODELS<br />
USING RECYCLABLE MATERIALS. THE CHILDREN WERE ENGAGED<br />
AND ENTHUSIASTIC.<br />
8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />
NONE<br />
9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />
THE CHILDREN ABSOLUTELY LOVE THEIR CREATIONS.<br />
Arts in Education Service - School Evaluations <strong>2011</strong>-<strong>2012</strong><br />
Page 102 of 332
ARTIST: ELLIOT SEMEL<br />
CONTRACT #: A7989<br />
TITLE OF PROGRAM: TROMBONE PLAYER FOR THE SHOW - THE DROWSY<br />
CHAPERONE<br />
TYPE OF PROGRAM: ASSEMBLY<br />
DISTRICT/ SCHOOL: CHAPPAQUA/HORACE GREELEY HIGH SCHOOL<br />
# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />
# OF STUDENTS: 15 GRADE(S) 9-12<br />
DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 11/17-19/11<br />
NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />
STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />
1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />
ARTIST: ENCORE PERFORMING ARTS, INC. CONTRACT #: A7783<br />
TITLE OF PROGRAM: AMERICAN DANCE FROM AFRICA TO BROADWAY<br />
TYPE OF PROGRAM: ASSEMBLY<br />
DISTRICT/ SCHOOL:<br />
# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />
SOMERS/PRIMROSE ELEM.<br />
# OF STUDENTS: 700 GRADE(S) K-2<br />
DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 3/19/12<br />
NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />
STANDARD 1 STANDARD 2 STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4 X<br />
1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />
1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />
2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />
3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />
4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />
5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />
6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />
7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />
ELLIOT IS A GIFTED MUSICIAN AND GREAT SUPPORT FOR OUR<br />
STUDENTS.<br />
8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />
NONE<br />
9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />
I LOOK FORWARD TO WORKING WITH HIM AGAIN.<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />
2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />
3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />
4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />
5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />
6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />
7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />
FOR AN OLDER AUDIENCE.<br />
8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />
TAILOR IT MORE TOWARDS K-2 FOR THE BACKGROUND OF SLAVES<br />
COMING TO AMERICA.<br />
9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />
NONE<br />
4<br />
4<br />
5<br />
5<br />
4<br />
5<br />
ARTIST:<br />
ENCORE PERFORMING ARTS, INC.<br />
TITLE OF PROGRAM: ANNIE HICKMAN - WEAVING THE WILD<br />
TYPE OF PROGRAM: ASSEMBLY<br />
DISTRICT/ SCHOOL:<br />
SOMERS/PRIMROSE ELEM.<br />
CONTRACT #: A8806<br />
# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />
# OF STUDENTS: 220 GRADE(S) 1<br />
DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE<br />
5/23/12<br />
NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />
STANDARD 1 STANDARD 2 STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />
1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />
1.<br />
2.<br />
3.<br />
4.<br />
5.<br />
6.<br />
STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />
ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />
EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />
ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />
TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />
QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />
5<br />
5<br />
4<br />
5<br />
5<br />
N/<br />
7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />
COSTUMES AND DANCE WERE FANTASTIC. STUDENTS LOVED THE<br />
SHOW.<br />
8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />
NONE<br />
9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />
NONE<br />
ARTIST: ENCORE PERFORMING ARTS, INC. CONTRACT #: A7943<br />
TITLE OF PROGRAM: CRABGRASS PUPPET THEATRE - HAIKU, HIP HOP &<br />
HOT DOGS<br />
TYPE OF PROGRAM: ASSEMBLY<br />
DISTRICT/ SCHOOL: HENDRICK HUDSON/BUCHANAN/VERPLANCK ELEM.<br />
# OF TEACHERS: 7<br />
# OF STUDENTS: 307 GRADE(S) K-5<br />
DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 1/18/12<br />
NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />
STANDARD 1 STANDARD 2 STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />
1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />
1.<br />
2.<br />
3.<br />
4.<br />
5.<br />
6.<br />
STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />
ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />
EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />
ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />
TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />
QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />
CRABGRASS IS AN EXCELLENT PERFORMANCE GROUP. THEY ARE<br />
WHOLLY PROFESSIONAL, UNDERSTAND THE ELEMENTARY<br />
AUDIENCE AND KEEP THE STUDENTS INVOLVED FROM START TO<br />
FINISH. STUDENTS WERE EDUCATED AND ENTERTAINED.<br />
8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />
NONE<br />
9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />
PERFORMERS ARE WONDERFUL AT AIMING THEIR PROGRAM TO<br />
THE CORRECT AUDIENCE. KUDOS.<br />
Arts in Education Service - School Evaluations <strong>2011</strong>-<strong>2012</strong><br />
Page 103 of 332
ARTIST: ENCORE PERFORMING ARTS, INC. CONTRACT #: A7853<br />
TITLE OF PROGRAM: LISA LOU - MAGIC OF CHEMISTRY SHOW<br />
TYPE OF PROGRAM: ASSEMBLY<br />
DISTRICT/ SCHOOL: PUTNAM VALLEY/PUTNAM VALLEY ELEM.<br />
# OF TEACHERS: 5<br />
# OF STUDENTS: 140 GRADE(S) 5<br />
DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 11/2/11<br />
NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />
STANDARD 1 STANDARD 2 STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />
ARTIST: ENCORE PERFORMING ARTS, INC. CONTRACT #: A7874B<br />
TITLE OF PROGRAM: LISA LOU - MAGIC OF CHEMISTRY SHOW<br />
TYPE OF PROGRAM: ASSEMBLY<br />
DISTRICT/ SCHOOL:<br />
# OF TEACHERS: 4<br />
BYRAM HILLS/WAMPUS ELEM.<br />
# OF STUDENTS: 200 GRADE(S) 4<br />
DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 5/16/12<br />
NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />
STANDARD 1 STANDARD 2 STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />
1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />
1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />
1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />
2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />
3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />
4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />
5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />
6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />
4<br />
3<br />
3<br />
4/5<br />
4/5<br />
N/<br />
1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />
2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />
3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />
4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />
5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />
6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM?<br />
NONE<br />
8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />
NONE<br />
9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />
NONE<br />
Y<br />
WHY?<br />
7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />
THE STUDENTS ARE ENGAGED THROUGHOUT THE ENTIRE<br />
PERFORMANCE.<br />
8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />
NONE<br />
9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />
NONE<br />
ARTIST: ENCORE PERFORMING ARTS, INC. CONTRACT #: A7874A<br />
TITLE OF PROGRAM: MR. FISH PHENOMENAL PHYSICS SHOW<br />
TYPE OF PROGRAM: ASSEMBLY<br />
DISTRICT/ SCHOOL:<br />
# OF TEACHERS: 4<br />
BYRAM HILLS/WAMPUS ELEM.<br />
# OF STUDENTS: 200 GRADE(S) 5<br />
DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 5/16/12<br />
NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />
STANDARD 1 STANDARD 2 STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />
ARTIST: ENCORE PERFORMING ARTS, INC. CONTRACT #: A7651<br />
TITLE OF PROGRAM: TAINO-LATIN AMERICAN JOURNEY<br />
TYPE OF PROGRAM: ASSEMBLY<br />
DISTRICT/ SCHOOL:<br />
# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />
OSSINING/PARK SCHOOL<br />
# OF STUDENTS: 400 GRADE(S) PRE K &<br />
DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 12/8/11<br />
NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />
STANDARD 1 STANDARD 2 STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4 X<br />
1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />
1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />
1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />
2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />
3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />
4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />
5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />
6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />
2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />
3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />
4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />
5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />
6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
N/<br />
7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />
THE STUDENTS ARE ENGAGED THROUGHOUT THE ENTIRE<br />
PERFORMANCE.<br />
8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />
NONE<br />
9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />
NONE<br />
7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM?<br />
NONE<br />
8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />
NONE<br />
9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />
THEY ARE SO AGE APPROPRIATE. THANK YOU.<br />
Y<br />
WHY?<br />
Arts in Education Service - School Evaluations <strong>2011</strong>-<strong>2012</strong><br />
Page 104 of 332
ARTIST: ERIC DRUCKER<br />
CONTRACT #: A7990<br />
TITLE OF PROGRAM: CLARINET PLAYER FOR THE SHOW - THE DROWSY<br />
CHAPERONE<br />
TYPE OF PROGRAM: ASSEMBLY<br />
DISTRICT/ SCHOOL: CHAPPAQUA/HORACE GREELEY HIGH SCHOOL<br />
# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />
# OF STUDENTS: 35 GRADE(S) 9-12<br />
DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 11/17-19/11<br />
NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />
STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />
1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />
ARTIST: ERIC LITWIN<br />
CONTRACT #: A8250<br />
TITLE OF PROGRAM: AUTHOR VISIT - MUSICAL STORIES<br />
TYPE OF PROGRAM: ASSEMBLY<br />
DISTRICT/ SCHOOL:<br />
# OF TEACHERS: 6<br />
ARDSLEY/CONCORD ROAD ELEM.<br />
# OF STUDENTS: 140 GRADE(S) K<br />
DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 1/30/12<br />
NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />
STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />
1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />
1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />
2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />
3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />
4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />
5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />
6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />
7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />
ERIC WAS A GREAT ADDITION TO OUR SHOW.<br />
8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />
NONE<br />
9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />
I HOPE TO WORK WITH HIM AGAIN.<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />
2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />
3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />
4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />
5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />
6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />
7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />
BEST ASSEMBLY WE'VE EVER HAD.<br />
8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />
NONE. KEEP IT UP.<br />
9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />
WE CAN'T WAIT TO HAVE HIM BACK.<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
N/<br />
ARTIST: ERIC ZOBACK<br />
CONTRACT #: A7867<br />
TITLE OF PROGRAM: SET DESIGN & CONSTRUCTION FOR THE FALL PLAY -<br />
THE TEMPEST<br />
TYPE OF PROGRAM: RESIDENCY<br />
DISTRICT/ SCHOOL:<br />
# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />
ARDSLEY/ARDSLEY HIGH SCHOOL<br />
# OF STUDENTS: 30 GRADE(S) 9-12<br />
DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 10/19-11/19/11<br />
NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />
STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 X STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />
ARTIST: ERIC ZOBACK<br />
CONTRACT #: A8083A<br />
TITLE OF PROGRAM: SET DESIGN & CONSTRUCTION FOR THE SENIOR<br />
REVUE<br />
TYPE OF PROGRAM: RESIDENCY<br />
DISTRICT/ SCHOOL:<br />
# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />
ARDSLEY/ARDSLEY HIGH SCHOOL<br />
# OF STUDENTS: GRADE(S) 12<br />
DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 12/1/11-1/21/12<br />
NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />
STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 X STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />
1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />
1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />
1.<br />
2.<br />
3.<br />
4.<br />
5.<br />
6.<br />
STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />
ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />
EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />
ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />
TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />
QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
N/<br />
7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />
ERIC DOES AN OUTSTANDING JOB. HIS CREATIVITY AND SENSE OF<br />
ASTHETICS ADDS TO OUR PRODUCTION.<br />
8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />
NONE<br />
9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />
THIS SET AN EXCELLENT EXAMPLE OF HOW ARTS ENHANCE NOT<br />
ONLY THE SHOW BUT STUDENTS EXPERIENCE WITH HOW SETS,<br />
TIME AND COLOR ENHANCE A PERFORMANCE.<br />
1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />
2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />
3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />
4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />
5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />
6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />
7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />
ALWAYS A PLEASURE TO WORK WITH. HIS PROFESSIONALISM<br />
SERVES AS A MODEL FOR OUR STUDENTS.<br />
8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />
NONE<br />
9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />
HE WORKS EFFICIENTLY WITH OUR REHEARSAL SCHEDULE AND<br />
THE SHOW LOOKS GREAT.<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
Arts in Education Service - School Evaluations <strong>2011</strong>-<strong>2012</strong><br />
Page 105 of 332
ARTIST: ERIC ZOBACK<br />
CONTRACT #: A8083B<br />
TITLE OF PROGRAM: SET DESIGN & CONSTRUCTION FOR THE SPRING<br />
MUSICAL<br />
TYPE OF PROGRAM: RESIDENCY<br />
DISTRICT/ SCHOOL:<br />
# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />
ARDSLEY/ARDSLEY HIGH SCHOOL<br />
# OF STUDENTS: GRADE(S) 9-12<br />
DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 2/6-3/17/12<br />
NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />
STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 X STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />
1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />
ARTIST: ERIC ZORK ALAN<br />
CONTRACT #: A8667<br />
TITLE OF PROGRAM: SLAM POETRY<br />
TYPE OF PROGRAM: RESIDENCY<br />
DISTRICT/ SCHOOL: WHITE PLAINS/MAMARONECK AVENUE ELEM. ELEM.<br />
# OF TEACHERS: 4<br />
# OF STUDENTS: 103 GRADE(S) 5<br />
DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 5/30-6/7/12<br />
NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />
STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 X STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4 X<br />
1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />
1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />
2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />
3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />
4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />
5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />
6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />
7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />
NONE<br />
8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />
NONE<br />
9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />
NONE<br />
4<br />
5<br />
4<br />
4<br />
5<br />
5<br />
1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />
2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />
3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />
4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />
5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />
6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />
7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />
ERIC ZORK ALAN CONTINUES TO ENGAGE AND EXCITE THE<br />
EMERGING POETS.<br />
8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />
PROVIDE MORE TIME FOR STUDENTS "FLASH" WRITIING AND<br />
SHARING.<br />
9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />
IT'S ALWAYS WONDERFUL TO HAVE THIS ARTIST VISIT US.<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
3<br />
ARTIST: ERICKA SCHLENKERMANN<br />
CONTRACT #: A8515<br />
TITLE OF PROGRAM: OBOE PLAYER FOR THE SHOW - BEAUTY AND THE<br />
BEAST<br />
TYPE OF PROGRAM: ASSEMBLY<br />
DISTRICT/ SCHOOL: PLEASANTVILLE/PLEASANTVILLE HIGH SCHOOL<br />
# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />
# OF STUDENTS: 400 GRADE(S) 9-12<br />
DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 3/9-17/12<br />
NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />
STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />
ARTIST: ERIKA LOUIZ<br />
CONTRACT #: A8040<br />
TITLE OF PROGRAM: CHOREOGRAPHER FOR THE SHOW - BEAUTY AND<br />
THE BEAST<br />
TYPE OF PROGRAM: RESIDENCY<br />
DISTRICT/ SCHOOL: PLEASANTVILLE/PLEASANTVILLE HIGH SCHOOL<br />
# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />
# OF STUDENTS: 70 GRADE(S) 9-12<br />
DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 12/15/11-3/9/12<br />
NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />
STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 X STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />
1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />
1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />
1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />
2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />
3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />
4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />
5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />
6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />
7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />
PROFESSIONAL QUALITYMUSIC GREAT SUPPORT FOR OUR<br />
PRODUCTION.<br />
8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />
NONE<br />
9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />
NONE<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
N/<br />
5<br />
N/<br />
1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />
2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />
3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />
4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />
5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />
6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />
7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />
HAVING STUDENTS WORK WITH A CHOREOGRAPHER WAS<br />
WONDERFUL NOT ONLY FOR EXPERIENCED DANCERS, WHO WERE<br />
CHALLENGED, BUT WITH NON DANCERS BEING INTRODUCED TO<br />
THE DANCE FORM OF ART.<br />
8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />
RUNNING THE PIECE IN SEQUENCE SO THE STUDENTS BECOME<br />
AWARE OF THE ENTIRE PIECE.<br />
9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />
ERIKA IS AN EXCELLENT CHOREOGRAPHER AND WORKED WELL<br />
WITH THE DIRECTOR.<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
N/<br />
Arts in Education Service - School Evaluations <strong>2011</strong>-<strong>2012</strong><br />
Page 106 of 332
ARTIST: ERIN GINSBURG<br />
CONTRACT #: A7927<br />
TITLE OF PROGRAM: PARIS CRAFTS<br />
TYPE OF PROGRAM: WORKSHOP<br />
DISTRICT/ SCHOOL: CHAPPAQUA/WESTORCHARD ELEM.<br />
# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />
# OF STUDENTS: 10 GRADE(S) 1-3<br />
DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 1/13-3/9/12<br />
NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />
STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 X STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4 X<br />
1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />
ARTIST: ERNEST SCHEFFLEIN<br />
CONTRACT #: A8514<br />
TITLE OF PROGRAM: CLARINET PLAYER FOR THE SHOW - BEAUTY AND<br />
THE BEAST<br />
TYPE OF PROGRAM: ASSEMBLY<br />
DISTRICT/ SCHOOL: PLEASANTVILLE/PLEASANTVILLE HIGH SCHOOL<br />
# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />
# OF STUDENTS: 400 GRADE(S) 9-12<br />
DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 3/9-17/12<br />
NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />
STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />
1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />
1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />
2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />
3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />
4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />
5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />
6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />
7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />
NONE<br />
8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />
NONE<br />
9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />
NONE<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />
2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />
3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />
4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />
5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />
6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />
7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />
HIGH, PROFESSIONAL QUALITY MUSIC SUPPORTING OUR<br />
PRODUCTION.<br />
8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />
NONE<br />
9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />
NONE<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
4<br />
5<br />
4<br />
ARTIST: EUGENE McLEER<br />
CONTRACT #: A8458<br />
TITLE OF PROGRAM: GUITAR PLAYER FOR THE SHOW - THIRTEEN<br />
COLONIES<br />
TYPE OF PROGRAM: ASSEMBLY<br />
DISTRICT/ SCHOOL: NEW ROCHELLE/DANIEL WEBSTER ELEM.<br />
# OF TEACHERS: 4<br />
# OF STUDENTS: 90 GRADE(S) 2<br />
DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 2/13-15/12<br />
NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />
STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />
1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />
ARTIST: FLOYD COOPER<br />
CONTRACT #: A8517<br />
TITLE OF PROGRAM: AUTHOR/ILLUSTRATOR VISIT<br />
TYPE OF PROGRAM: ASSEMBLY<br />
DISTRICT/ SCHOOL:<br />
# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />
BRIARCLIFF/TODD ELEM.<br />
# OF STUDENTS: 200 GRADE(S) 2 & 3<br />
DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 3/13/12<br />
NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />
STANDARD 1 STANDARD 2 STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />
1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />
1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />
2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />
3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />
4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />
5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />
6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />
7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />
NONE<br />
8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />
NONE<br />
9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />
NONE<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />
2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />
3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />
4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />
5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />
6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />
7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />
FLOYD IS AN OUTSTANDING TALENT WHO ENGAGES THE<br />
STUDENTS DURING THE ENTIRE PRESENTATION.<br />
8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />
NONE<br />
9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />
THE PRESENTATION WAS INTERACTIVE AND HAD A MULTI-<br />
SENSORY APPROACH. STUDENTS WERE FOCUSED THE ENTIRE<br />
TIME.<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
Arts in Education Service - School Evaluations <strong>2011</strong>-<strong>2012</strong><br />
Page 107 of 332
ARTIST: FOOD PLAY PRODUCTIONS<br />
CONTRACT #: A7668<br />
TITLE OF PROGRAM: FOOD PLAY SHOW<br />
TYPE OF PROGRAM: ASSEMBLY<br />
DISTRICT/ SCHOOL:<br />
# OF TEACHERS: 25<br />
BREWSTER/JFK ELEM.<br />
# OF STUDENTS: 24 GRADE(S) 1-3<br />
DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 9/23/11<br />
NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />
STANDARD 1 STANDARD 2 STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />
ARTIST: FOOD PLAY PRODUCTIONS<br />
CONTRACT #: A7765<br />
TITLE OF PROGRAM: FOOD PLAY SHOW<br />
TYPE OF PROGRAM: ASSEMBLY<br />
DISTRICT/ SCHOOL: NEW ROCHELLE/BARNARD EARLY CHILDHOOD CENT<br />
# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />
# OF STUDENTS: 650 GRADE(S) PRE K-2<br />
DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 3/8/12<br />
NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />
STANDARD 1 STANDARD 2 STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />
1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />
1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />
1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />
2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />
3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />
4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />
5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />
6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />
7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />
IT TEACHES A POWERFUL LESSON TO CHILDREN ABOUT EATING<br />
HEALTHY AND MAKING GOOD FOOD CHOICES.<br />
8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />
WHEN STUDENTS ALL SHOUT OUT AT ONCE, YOU CAN'T REALLY<br />
HEAR COMMENTS.<br />
9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />
NONE<br />
ARTIST: FOR ARTIST<br />
CONTRACT #: A7597<br />
TITLE OF PROGRAM: STEPHEN MANCUSI - FORENSIC ARTIST<br />
TYPE OF PROGRAM: ASSEMBLY/WORKSHOP<br />
DISTRICT/ SCHOOL:<br />
KATONAH/LEWISBORO/JOHN JAY HIGH SCHOOL<br />
# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />
# OF STUDENTS: 38 GRADE(S) 10-12<br />
DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE<br />
10/5 & 6/11<br />
NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />
STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 X STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
1.<br />
2.<br />
3.<br />
4.<br />
5.<br />
6.<br />
STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />
ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />
EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />
ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />
TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />
QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />
A GREAT WAY TO HELP DRIVE THE POINT THAT NUTRITION IS VERY<br />
IMPORTANT.<br />
8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />
NONE<br />
9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />
THANK YOU.<br />
ARTIST: FORARTIST<br />
CONTRACT #: A8834<br />
TITLE OF PROGRAM: STEPHEN MANCUSI - FORENSIC ARTIST<br />
TYPE OF PROGRAM: WORKSHOP<br />
DISTRICT/ SCHOOL: NEW ROCHELLE/NEW ROCHELLE HS<br />
# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />
# OF STUDENTS: 30 GRADE(S) 9-12<br />
DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 5/8 & 9/12<br />
NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />
STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 X STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />
1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />
1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />
1.<br />
2.<br />
3.<br />
4.<br />
5.<br />
6.<br />
STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />
ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />
EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />
ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />
TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />
QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />
STEVE WAS OUTSTANDING. THE CHILDREN WERE TOTALLY INTO<br />
CREATING THEIR COMPOSITE SKETCHES AND EVEN REQUESTED<br />
THAT HE RETURN TO TEACH THEM ABOUT CRIME SCENE<br />
SKETCHES. (UNFORTUNATELY NOT HIS EXPERTISE)<br />
8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />
STEVE HAS HIS PROGRAM PERFECTED.<br />
9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />
THANK YOU FOR ALL YOUR EFFORTS.<br />
1.<br />
2.<br />
3.<br />
4.<br />
5.<br />
6.<br />
STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />
ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />
EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />
ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />
TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />
QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />
STEPHEN HAS WORKED WITH MY FORENSICS CLASS FOR 12 YEARS<br />
AND STUDENTS STILL LOVE IT AND END UP WITH A CREATION THEY<br />
ARE VERY PROUD OF.<br />
8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />
WE JUST NEED MORE TIME WITH HIM.<br />
9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />
THIS IS AN ALTERNATIVE PROGRAM WITH AN AT RISK<br />
POPULATION. HE RELATES TO THE STUDENTS. HIS WORKSHOP IS<br />
RELEVANT, EDUCATIONALLY SOUND AND HIS MANNER IS<br />
TERRIFIC. ALWAYS A SUCCESS.<br />
Arts in Education Service - School Evaluations <strong>2011</strong>-<strong>2012</strong><br />
Page 108 of 332
ARTIST: FORARTIST<br />
CONTRACT #: A8314<br />
TITLE OF PROGRAM: STEPHEN MANCUSI - FORENSIC ARTIST<br />
TYPE OF PROGRAM: WORKSHOP<br />
DISTRICT/ SCHOOL: KATONAH/LEWISBORO/JOHN JAY HIGH SCHOOL<br />
# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />
# OF STUDENTS: 32 GRADE(S) 10-12<br />
DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 2/15-16/12<br />
NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />
STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 X STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />
ARTIST: FOSSIL CONNOISSEUR, INC./DINOSAUR<br />
CONTRACT #: A8093<br />
TITLE OF PROGRAM: FOSSIL ADVENTURE STORIES & CRAFTS<br />
TYPE OF PROGRAM: WORKSHOP<br />
DISTRICT/ SCHOOL: KATONAH/LEWISBORO/LEWISBORO ELEM.<br />
# OF TEACHERS: 3<br />
# OF STUDENTS: 55 GRADE(S) 1<br />
DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 4/16/12<br />
NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />
STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 X STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />
1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />
1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />
1.<br />
2.<br />
3.<br />
4.<br />
5.<br />
6.<br />
STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />
ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />
EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />
ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />
TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />
QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />
THIS WAS AN EXCELLENT PRESENTATION AND WORKSHOP.<br />
STUDENTS WERE FULLY ENGAGED THROUGHTOUT AND LEARNED<br />
SO MUCH.<br />
8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />
NONE<br />
9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />
IT WAS A HIT.<br />
1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />
2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />
3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />
4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />
5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />
6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />
7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />
THE STUDENTS ARE ENGAGED, INVOLVED AND INTERESTED.<br />
8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />
NONE<br />
9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />
NONE<br />
5<br />
N/<br />
4<br />
5<br />
5<br />
4<br />
ARTIST: FOSSIL CONNOISSEUR, INC./DINOSAUR<br />
CONTRACT #: A7787<br />
TITLE OF PROGRAM: FOSSIL ADVENTURE STORIES & CRAFTS<br />
TYPE OF PROGRAM: WORKSHOP<br />
DISTRICT/ SCHOOL: KATONAH/LEWISBORO/KATONAH ELEM. SCHOOL<br />
# OF TEACHERS: 3<br />
# OF STUDENTS: 60 GRADE(S) 1<br />
DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 3/26/12<br />
NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />
STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 X STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />
ARTIST: FRANCISCO NAVARRETE<br />
CONTRACT #: A8173<br />
TITLE OF PROGRAM: MARIACHI CITLALLI - MEXICAN CULTURAL FESTIVAL<br />
TYPE OF PROGRAM: ASSEMBLY<br />
DISTRICT/ SCHOOL:<br />
# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />
PELHAM/SIWANOY ELEM.<br />
# OF STUDENTS: 57 GRADE(S) 3<br />
DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 12/23/11<br />
NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />
STANDARD 1 STANDARD 2 STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4 X<br />
1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />
1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />
1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />
2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />
3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />
4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />
5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />
6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />
2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />
3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />
4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />
5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />
6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />
4<br />
5<br />
5<br />
4<br />
5<br />
N/<br />
7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM?<br />
AWESOME HANDS-ON PROGRAM.<br />
8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />
NONE<br />
9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />
NONE<br />
Y<br />
WHY?<br />
7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />
ALL OF THE STUDENTS LOVED THE PERFORMANCE AND THE<br />
PERFORMERS WERE FUN, CLEAR AND PURPOSEFUL IN THEIR<br />
PERFORMANCES.<br />
8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />
NONE<br />
9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />
NONE<br />
Arts in Education Service - School Evaluations <strong>2011</strong>-<strong>2012</strong><br />
Page 109 of 332
ARTIST: FRANK SALAMON ASSOCIATES CONTRACT #: A8540<br />
TITLE OF PROGRAM: EAST COAST CHAMBER ORCHESTRA<br />
TYPE OF PROGRAM: ASSEMBLY<br />
DISTRICT/ SCHOOL:<br />
# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />
PELHAM/HUTCHINSON ELEM.<br />
# OF STUDENTS: GRADE(S) 3-5<br />
DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 3/26/12<br />
NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />
STANDARD 1 STANDARD 2 STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />
1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />
ARTIST: FRED SMITH<br />
CONTRACT #: A8543<br />
TITLE OF PROGRAM: JAZZ / A HISTORY OF AFRICAN AMERICAN MUSICAL<br />
TRADITIONS<br />
TYPE OF PROGRAM: ASSEMBLY<br />
DISTRICT/ SCHOOL: MT.VERNON/MT. VERNON HIGH SCHOOL<br />
# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />
# OF STUDENTS: 200 GRADE(S) 9-12<br />
DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 2/15/12<br />
NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />
STANDARD 1 STANDARD 2 STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4 X<br />
1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />
1.<br />
2.<br />
3.<br />
4.<br />
5.<br />
6.<br />
STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />
ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />
EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />
ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />
TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />
QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
4<br />
5<br />
7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />
ENGAGED STUDENTS. ARTISTS WERE ENTHUSIASTIC AND SEEMED<br />
TO REALLY ENJOY ENTERTAINING THE STUDENTS.<br />
8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />
NONE<br />
9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />
OUTSTANDING, EDUCATIONAL AND AN INTERACTIVE ASSEMBLY.<br />
1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />
2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />
3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />
4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />
5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />
6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />
7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />
THE ASSEMBLY WAS ENGAGING AND PRESENTED FACTUAL<br />
INFORMATION.<br />
8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />
NONE<br />
9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />
EXCELLENT.<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
ARTIST: FRIEDA B., LLC<br />
CONTRACT #: A8153<br />
TITLE OF PROGRAM: RENATA BOWERS - AUTHOR VISIT<br />
TYPE OF PROGRAM: ASSEMBLY<br />
DISTRICT/ SCHOOL:<br />
# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />
LAKELAND/VAN CORT ELEM.<br />
# OF STUDENTS: 660 GRADE(S) K-5<br />
DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 5/2/12<br />
NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />
STANDARD 1 STANDARD 2 STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />
ARTIST: FRIEDA B., LLC<br />
CONTRACT #: A8634<br />
TITLE OF PROGRAM: RENATA BOWERS - AUTHOR VISIT<br />
TYPE OF PROGRAM: ASSEMBLY<br />
DISTRICT/ SCHOOL: BREWSTER/GARDEN STREET ELEM.<br />
# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />
# OF STUDENTS: GRADE(S) 2<br />
DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 3/16/12<br />
NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />
STANDARD 1 STANDARD 2 STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />
1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />
1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />
1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />
2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />
3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />
4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />
5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />
6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />
2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />
3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />
4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />
5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />
6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM?<br />
SHE IS FANTASTIC.<br />
Y<br />
WHY?<br />
7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y<br />
SHE IS A WONDERFUL AUTHOR AND VERY INSPIRING.<br />
WHY?<br />
8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />
NONE<br />
9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />
THANK YOU FOR COMING. OUR STUDENTS LOVED YOUR<br />
PRESENTATION. THEY ALSO LOVE YOUR BOOKS.<br />
8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />
NONE<br />
9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />
ONLY SUGGESTION WOULD BE TO WRITE MORE BOOKS.<br />
Arts in Education Service - School Evaluations <strong>2011</strong>-<strong>2012</strong><br />
Page 110 of 332
ARTIST: FRIEDA B., LLC<br />
CONTRACT #: A8499<br />
TITLE OF PROGRAM: RENATA BOWERS - AUTHOR VISIT<br />
TYPE OF PROGRAM: ASSEMBLY/WORKSHOP<br />
DISTRICT/ SCHOOL: KATONAH/LEWISBORO/INCREASE MILLER ELEM.<br />
# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />
# OF STUDENTS: 345 GRADE(S) K-5<br />
DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 2/8/12<br />
NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />
STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 X STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />
1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />
ARTIST: GAIL GHRISTIE<br />
CONTRACT #: A8178<br />
TITLE OF PROGRAM: CHOREOGRAPHER FOR THE SHOW - ANNIE GET<br />
YOUR GUN<br />
TYPE OF PROGRAM: RESIDENCY<br />
DISTRICT/ SCHOOL:<br />
# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />
TUCKAHOE/TUCKAHOE MS & HS<br />
# OF STUDENTS: GRADE(S) 6-12<br />
DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 1/12-3/19/12<br />
NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />
STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 X STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />
1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />
1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />
2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />
3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />
4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />
5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />
6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />
7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />
A TRULY EDUCATIONAL EXPERIENCE.<br />
8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />
NONE<br />
9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />
NONE<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />
2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />
3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />
4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />
5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />
6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />
7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />
EXCELLENT CHOREOGRAPHY AND WORKING WITH STUDENTS -<br />
ALWAYS GIVES 110%.<br />
8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />
NONE<br />
9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />
NONE<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
N/<br />
ARTIST: GAIL LEVINE<br />
CONTRACT #: A8657<br />
TITLE OF PROGRAM: AUTHOR VISIT<br />
TYPE OF PROGRAM: ASSEMBLY/WORKSHOP<br />
DISTRICT/ SCHOOL: BREWSTER/C.V. STARR INTERMEDIATE SCHOOL<br />
# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />
# OF STUDENTS: GRADE(S) 4 & 5<br />
DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 3/5-9/12<br />
NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />
STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />
ARTIST: GAIL LEVINE<br />
CONTRACT #: A8840<br />
TITLE OF PROGRAM: AUTHOR VISIT<br />
TYPE OF PROGRAM: ASSEMBLY<br />
DISTRICT/ SCHOOL: KATONAH/LEWISBORO/JOHN JAY MIDDLE SCHOOL<br />
# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />
# OF STUDENTS: 100 GRADE(S) 6<br />
DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 6/1/12<br />
NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />
STANDARD 1 STANDARD 2 STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />
1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />
1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />
1.<br />
2.<br />
3.<br />
4.<br />
5.<br />
6.<br />
STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />
ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />
EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />
ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />
TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />
QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />
MRS. LEVINE VISITED OUR SCHOOL FOR 3 DAYS. SHE DID WRITING<br />
WORKSHOPS - WONDERFUL AND ENRICHING FOR STUDENTS.<br />
8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />
NONE<br />
9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />
WONDERFUL VISIT.<br />
1.<br />
2.<br />
3.<br />
4.<br />
5.<br />
6.<br />
STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />
ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />
EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />
ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />
TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />
QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
N/<br />
7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />
GAIL ENGAGED STUDENTS IN LITERATURE AND SOCIOLOGY FOR<br />
THE BOOK' DAVE AT NIGHT'. THEY HAD READ THE BOOK AND THEY<br />
LOVED HEARING ABOUT THE REAL PERSON WHO INSPIRED THE<br />
BOOK.<br />
8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />
NONE<br />
9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />
STUDENTS LOVED THAT A REAL AUTHOR LIVED NEARBY AND THAT<br />
SHE WAS RELATED TO A CLASSMATE. ALSO, GAIL GOT THEM<br />
INTERESTED IN THE PAST.<br />
Arts in Education Service - School Evaluations <strong>2011</strong>-<strong>2012</strong><br />
Page 111 of 332
ARTIST: GARRISON ART CENTER<br />
CONTRACT #: A8768<br />
TITLE OF PROGRAM: CHRISTINA DIMARCO - ANCIENT ART OF<br />
SUMINAGASH<br />
TYPE OF PROGRAM: WORKSHOP<br />
DISTRICT/ SCHOOL: PEEKSKILL/PEEKSKILL MIDDLE SCHOOL<br />
# OF TEACHERS: 2<br />
# OF STUDENTS: 60 GRADE(S) 7 & 8<br />
DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 5/8-22/12<br />
NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />
STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 X STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4 X<br />
ARTIST: GEORGE CROOM<br />
CONTRACT #: A8443<br />
TITLE OF PROGRAM: COSTUME DESIGNER FOR THE SHOW - A FUNNY<br />
THING HAPPENED ON THE WAY TO THE FORUM<br />
TYPE OF PROGRAM: RESIDENCY<br />
DISTRICT/ SCHOOL: PUTNAM VALLEY/PUTNAM VALLEY HIGH SCHOOL<br />
# OF TEACHERS: 3<br />
# OF STUDENTS: 400 GRADE(S) 9-12<br />
DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 3/3-4/23/12<br />
NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />
STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 X STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />
1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />
1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />
1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />
2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />
3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />
4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />
5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />
6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />
7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />
STUDENTS WERE ENGAGED FOR THE WHOLE 3 SESSION<br />
WORKSHOP. STUDENTS WERE EAGER TO LEARN AND CREATE.<br />
8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />
NONE<br />
9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />
WOULD LOVE TO HAVE MORE TIME.<br />
5<br />
5<br />
4<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />
2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />
3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />
4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />
5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />
6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />
7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />
NONE<br />
8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />
NONE<br />
9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />
NONE<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
ARTIST: GEORGE CROOM<br />
CONTRACT #: A7779<br />
TITLE OF PROGRAM: COSTUME DESIGNER FOR THE SHOW - DRACULA<br />
TYPE OF PROGRAM: RESIDENCY<br />
DISTRICT/ SCHOOL: PUTNAM VALLEY/PUTNAM VALLEY HIGH SCHOOL<br />
# OF TEACHERS: 2<br />
# OF STUDENTS: 50 GRADE(S) 9-12<br />
DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 11/1-12/5/11<br />
NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />
STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 X STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />
1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />
ARTIST: GEORGE CROOM<br />
CONTRACT #: A8346<br />
TITLE OF PROGRAM: MUSIC DIRECTOR FOR THE SHOW - ONCE UPON A<br />
MATTRESS<br />
TYPE OF PROGRAM: RESIDENCY<br />
DISTRICT/ SCHOOL: GREENBURGH #7/WOODLANDS MS/HS<br />
# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />
# OF STUDENTS: GRADE(S) 7-12<br />
DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 1/23-3/31/12<br />
NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />
STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 X STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />
1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />
1.<br />
2.<br />
3.<br />
4.<br />
5.<br />
6.<br />
STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />
ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />
EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />
ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />
TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />
QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />
GEORGE IS CREATIVE, PROFESSIONAL, FUN TO WORK WITH AND<br />
THE STUDENTS LOVE WORKING WITH HIM.<br />
8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />
NONE<br />
9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />
NONE<br />
1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />
2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />
3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />
4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />
5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />
6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />
7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />
EXCELLENT PROGRAM.<br />
8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />
NONE<br />
9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />
NONE<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
Arts in Education Service - School Evaluations <strong>2011</strong>-<strong>2012</strong><br />
Page 112 of 332
ARTIST: GERALDINE P. WINTERROTH<br />
CONTRACT #: A8301<br />
TITLE OF PROGRAM: MUSICAL DIRECTOR FOR SPRING MUSICAL - BYE,<br />
BYE BIRDIE<br />
TYPE OF PROGRAM: RESIDENCY<br />
DISTRICT/ SCHOOL: IRVINGTON/IRVINGTON HIGH SCHOOL<br />
# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />
# OF STUDENTS: 600 GRADE(S) 9-12<br />
DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 1/17-3/17/12<br />
NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />
STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 X STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />
1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />
ARTIST: GERALDINE P. WINTERROTH<br />
CONTRACT #: A7634<br />
TITLE OF PROGRAM: MUSICAL DIRECTOR FOR THE SHOW - WIZARD OF OZ<br />
TYPE OF PROGRAM: RESIDENCY<br />
DISTRICT/ SCHOOL: IRVINGTON/IRVINGTON HIGH SCHOOL<br />
# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />
# OF STUDENTS: 650 GRADE(S) 9-12<br />
DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 9/19-11/6/11<br />
NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />
STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 X STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />
1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />
1.<br />
2.<br />
3.<br />
4.<br />
5.<br />
6.<br />
STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />
ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />
EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />
ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />
TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />
QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />
5<br />
5<br />
N/<br />
5<br />
5<br />
N/<br />
7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />
SHE IS A GREAT RESOURCE FOR HOW TO WORK WITH A STUDENT<br />
PIT ORCHESTRA.<br />
8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />
NONE<br />
9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />
NONE<br />
1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />
2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />
3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />
4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />
5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />
6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />
7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />
MOST SCHOOLS HAVE THEIR OWN MUSICAL. OUR GROUP<br />
PERFORMED FOR THE ELEMENTARY AND MIDDLE SCHOOL.<br />
8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />
NONE<br />
9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />
NONE<br />
5<br />
5<br />
3<br />
N/<br />
5<br />
N/<br />
ARTIST: GIANNA COZZALI<br />
CONTRACT #: A8502<br />
TITLE OF PROGRAM: THEATRE ARTS / SHOW PRODUCTION<br />
TYPE OF PROGRAM: RESIDENCY<br />
DISTRICT/ SCHOOL:<br />
# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />
TUCKAHOE/W. E. COTTLE ELEM.<br />
# OF STUDENTS: 530 GRADE(S) 4 & 5<br />
DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 2/12-6/12/12<br />
NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />
STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 X STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />
ARTIST: GINA KINGSLEY dba PAINT YOUR ART O<br />
CONTRACT #: A8029A<br />
TITLE OF PROGRAM: A STUDY OF MATISS I<br />
TYPE OF PROGRAM: WORKSHOP<br />
DISTRICT/ SCHOOL: NEW ROCHELLE/ISAAC YOUNG MIDDLE SCHOOL<br />
# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />
# OF STUDENTS: 15 GRADE(S) 8<br />
DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 12/1-23/11<br />
NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />
STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 X STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />
1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />
1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />
1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />
2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />
3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />
4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />
5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />
6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />
2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />
3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />
4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />
5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />
6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM?<br />
NONE<br />
8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />
NONE<br />
9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />
NONE<br />
Y<br />
WHY?<br />
7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />
THIS IS A WELL PRESENTED AND EXECUTED PROGRAM THAT<br />
RESULTS IN A FANTASTIC ART INSTALLATION IN THE BUILDING.<br />
8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />
NONE<br />
9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />
NONE<br />
Arts in Education Service - School Evaluations <strong>2011</strong>-<strong>2012</strong><br />
Page 113 of 332
ARTIST: GINA KINGSLEY dba PAINT YOUR ART O CONTRACT #: A8029B<br />
TITLE OF PROGRAM: A STUDY OF MATISS II<br />
TYPE OF PROGRAM: WORKSHOP<br />
DISTRICT/ SCHOOL: NEW ROCHELLE/ISAAC YOUNG MIDDLE SCHOOL<br />
# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />
# OF STUDENTS: 15 GRADE(S) 8<br />
DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 1/4-2/29/12<br />
NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />
STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 X STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />
ARTIST: GINA KINGSLEY dba PAINT YOUR ART O<br />
CONTRACT #: A8688<br />
TITLE OF PROGRAM: MOSAIC ANIMALS<br />
TYPE OF PROGRAM: WORKSHOP<br />
DISTRICT/ SCHOOL: NEW ROCHELLE/TRINITY ELEM. SCHOOL<br />
# OF TEACHERS: 4<br />
# OF STUDENTS: 150 GRADE(S) 1<br />
DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 4/4-6/7/12<br />
NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />
STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 X STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />
1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />
1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />
1.<br />
2.<br />
3.<br />
4.<br />
5.<br />
6.<br />
STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />
ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />
EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />
ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />
TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />
QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />
RELATES WELL WITH STUDENTS AND STAFF. FANTASTIC RESULTS.<br />
8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />
NONE<br />
9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />
NONE<br />
1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />
2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />
3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />
4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />
5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />
6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />
7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />
ALWAYS A GRATIFING EXPERIENCE.<br />
8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />
NONE<br />
9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />
NONE<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
ARTIST: GINA KINGSLEY dba PAINT YOUR ART O<br />
CONTRACT #: A8061A<br />
TITLE OF PROGRAM: POTTERY<br />
TYPE OF PROGRAM: WORKSHOP<br />
DISTRICT/ SCHOOL:<br />
# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />
PELHAM/PROSPECT HILL ELEM.<br />
# OF STUDENTS: 12 GRADE(S) K-2<br />
DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 1/13-3/9/12<br />
NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />
STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 X STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />
ARTIST: GINA KINGSLEY dba PAINT YOUR ART O<br />
CONTRACT #: A8061B<br />
TITLE OF PROGRAM: POTTERY<br />
TYPE OF PROGRAM: WORKSHOP<br />
DISTRICT/ SCHOOL:<br />
# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />
PELHAM/PROSPECT HILL ELEM.<br />
# OF STUDENTS: 12 GRADE(S) 3-5<br />
DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 1/13-3/9/12<br />
NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />
STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 X STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />
1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />
1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />
1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />
2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />
3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />
4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />
5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />
6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
N/<br />
1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />
2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />
3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />
4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />
5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />
6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
N/<br />
7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM?<br />
NONE<br />
Y<br />
WHY?<br />
7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM?<br />
NONE<br />
Y<br />
WHY?<br />
8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />
NONE<br />
9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />
NONE<br />
8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />
NONE<br />
9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />
NONE<br />
Arts in Education Service - School Evaluations <strong>2011</strong>-<strong>2012</strong><br />
Page 114 of 332
ARTIST: GINA NOTO<br />
CONTRACT #: A8119<br />
TITLE OF PROGRAM: CHOREOGRAPHER FOR THE SHOW - FOOTLOOSE<br />
TYPE OF PROGRAM: RESIDENCY<br />
DISTRICT/ SCHOOL: CHAPPAQUA/BELL MIDDLE SCHOOL<br />
# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />
# OF STUDENTS: GRADE(S) 5-8<br />
DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 1/17-3/25/12<br />
NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />
STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 X STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />
1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />
ARTIST: GLENN RHIAN<br />
CONTRACT #: A8513<br />
TITLE OF PROGRAM: PERCUSSION PLAYER FOR THE SHOW - BEAUTY<br />
AND THE BEAST<br />
TYPE OF PROGRAM: ASSEMBLY<br />
DISTRICT/ SCHOOL: PLEASANTVILLE/PLEASANTVILLE HIGH SCHOOL<br />
# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />
# OF STUDENTS: 400 GRADE(S) 9-12<br />
DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 3/9-17/12<br />
NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />
STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />
1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />
1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />
2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />
3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />
4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />
5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />
6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />
7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />
THE STUDENTS LOVE THIS PROGRAM.<br />
8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />
NONE<br />
9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />
NONE<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
N/<br />
1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />
2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />
3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />
4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />
5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />
6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />
7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />
PROFESSIONAL LEVEL MUSIC, ASSISTING STUDENT MUSICIANS.<br />
8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />
NONE<br />
9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />
NONE<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
ARTIST: GLOBAL LEARNING, INC. - DAVID JOHNS CONTRACT #: A7930<br />
TITLE OF PROGRAM: A WALK THROUGH EAST AFRICA<br />
TYPE OF PROGRAM: WORKSHOP<br />
DISTRICT/ SCHOOL: KATONAH/LEWISBORO/MEADOWPOND ELEM.<br />
# OF TEACHERS: 4<br />
# OF STUDENTS: GRADE(S) 3<br />
DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 2/17/12<br />
NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />
STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 X STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4 X<br />
ARTIST: GLOBAL LEARNING, INC. - DAVID JOHNS CONTRACT #: A8568<br />
TITLE OF PROGRAM: A WALK THROUGH EAST AFRICA<br />
TYPE OF PROGRAM: WORKSHOP<br />
DISTRICT/ SCHOOL: KATONAH/LEWISBORO/LEWISBORO ELEM.<br />
# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />
# OF STUDENTS: 80 GRADE(S) 3<br />
DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 3/30/12<br />
NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />
STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 X STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4 X<br />
1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />
1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />
1.<br />
2.<br />
3.<br />
4.<br />
5.<br />
6.<br />
STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />
ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />
EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />
ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />
TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />
QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />
STUDENTS HAD RELATABLE VISUAL SLIDES TO COMPARE LIFE IN<br />
THE UNITED STATES TO LIFE IN KENYA. IT IS REAL LIFE EXAMPLES.<br />
8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />
NONE<br />
9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />
STUDENTS ENJOY LEARNING ABOUT THE ARTIFACTS.<br />
1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />
2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />
3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />
4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />
5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />
6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />
7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />
NONE<br />
8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />
NONE<br />
9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />
NONE<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
Arts in Education Service - School Evaluations <strong>2011</strong>-<strong>2012</strong><br />
Page 115 of 332
ARTIST: GLOBAL LEARNING, INC. - DAVID JOHNS CONTRACT #: A8000<br />
TITLE OF PROGRAM: NATIVE AMERICAN ARTIFACTS<br />
TYPE OF PROGRAM: WORKSHOP<br />
DISTRICT/ SCHOOL:<br />
KATONAH/LEWISBORO/MEADOWPOND ELEM.<br />
# OF TEACHERS: 6<br />
# OF STUDENTS: 130 GRADE(S) 4<br />
DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE<br />
11/10/11<br />
NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />
STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 X STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4 X<br />
1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />
1.<br />
2.<br />
3.<br />
4.<br />
5.<br />
6.<br />
STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />
ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />
EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />
ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />
TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />
QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
N/<br />
7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />
THIS WORKSHOP FITS IN FANTASTICALLY WITH OUR SS<br />
CURRICULUM. THE ARTIFACTS DAVE PRESENTS TO OUR<br />
STUDENTS SUPPORTED THEIR UNDERSTANDING THAT ARTIFACTS<br />
OFTEN SERVE A DUAL PURPOSE - AN ARTISTIC EXPRESIVE<br />
DIMENSION AND AS A USEFUL PRODUCT.<br />
8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />
NONE<br />
9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />
NONE<br />
ARTIST: GREGORY NEMEC<br />
CONTRACT #: A8159<br />
TITLE OF PROGRAM: SET DESIGNER / PAINTER FOR THE SHOW - BEAUTY<br />
AND THE BEAST<br />
TYPE OF PROGRAM: RESIDENCY<br />
DISTRICT/ SCHOOL:<br />
PLEASANTVILLE/PLEASANTVILLE HIGH SCHOOL<br />
# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />
# OF STUDENTS: 1000 GRADE(S) 9-12<br />
DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE<br />
1/3-20/12<br />
NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />
STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 X STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />
1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />
1.<br />
2.<br />
3.<br />
4.<br />
5.<br />
6.<br />
STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />
ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />
EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />
ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />
TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />
QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />
THE OPPORTUNITY TO BE MENTERED BY A PROFESSIONAL ARTIST<br />
IS A WONDERFUL ADDITION TO OUR PRODUCTION. STUDENTS<br />
DEVELOP SCENE PAINTING SKILLS UNDER GREGORY'S TUTELAGE<br />
AS WELL AS LEADERSHIP AND WORK ETHICS.<br />
8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />
NONE<br />
9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />
NONE<br />
ARTIST: GRECO AUDIO SERVICE<br />
CONTRACT #: A8392<br />
TITLE OF PROGRAM: CHRISTOPHER GRECO - SOUND DESIGNER FOR THE<br />
SHOW - XANADU<br />
TYPE OF PROGRAM: WORKSHOP<br />
DISTRICT/ SCHOOL: CHAPPAQUA/HORACE GREELEY HIGH SCHOOL<br />
# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />
# OF STUDENTS: 200 GRADE(S) 9-12<br />
DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 4/9-21/12<br />
NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />
STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 X STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4 X<br />
1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />
1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />
2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />
3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />
4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />
5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />
6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />
7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />
IMPORTANT FOR STUDENTS TO SEE AND LEARN HOW ALLTHE<br />
ELEMENTS AND COMPONENTS OF A MUSICAL SHOW COME<br />
TOGETHER.<br />
8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />
NONE<br />
9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />
COMMITTED TO HIS CRAFT AND INVESTED IN THE QUALITY AND<br />
OUTCOME OF THE PRODUCTION. THE STUDENTS LEARNED A LOT.<br />
ARTIST: GRUMBLING GRYPHONS<br />
CONTRACT #: A8044<br />
TITLE OF PROGRAM: MYTH OF PERSEPHONE<br />
TYPE OF PROGRAM: ASSEMBLY/WORKSHOP<br />
DISTRICT/ SCHOOL: NEW ROCHELLE/COLUMBUS ELEM.<br />
# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />
# OF STUDENTS: GRADE(S) 4<br />
DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 12/21/11<br />
NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />
STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 X STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />
1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />
1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />
2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />
3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />
4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />
5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />
6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />
7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />
THE PROGRAM WAS A WONDERFUL ADDITION TO OUR GREEK<br />
MYTHOLOGY UNIT BY CREATING HANDS ON WORKSHOPS THAT<br />
REINFORCED LITERATURE.<br />
8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />
GIVING THE STUDENTS THEIR LINES AHEAD OF TIME MIGHT HAVE<br />
HELPED.<br />
9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />
THE ACTORS ARE INCREDIBLY TALENTED INDIVIDUALS. THEY HAD<br />
COSTUMES THAT WERE FANTASTIC AND BROUGHT THE<br />
CHARACTERS TO LIFE.<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
4<br />
4<br />
N/<br />
Arts in Education Service - School Evaluations <strong>2011</strong>-<strong>2012</strong><br />
Page 116 of 332
ARTIST: GWENVERIA M. SARGEANT<br />
CONTRACT #: A8474<br />
TITLE OF PROGRAM: FASHION DESIGNS<br />
TYPE OF PROGRAM: WORKSHOP<br />
DISTRICT/ SCHOOL: CROTON/PIERRE VAN CORT MIDDLE SCHOOL<br />
# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />
# OF STUDENTS: 22 GRADE(S) 5-8<br />
DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 2/15-5/9/12<br />
NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />
STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 X STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />
ARTIST: HAIFA BINT-KADI<br />
CONTRACT #: A8541<br />
TITLE OF PROGRAM: MOSAIC PROJECT<br />
TYPE OF PROGRAM: WORKSHOP<br />
DISTRICT/ SCHOOL: HASTINGS/FARRAGUT MIDDLE SCHOOL<br />
# OF TEACHERS: 2<br />
# OF STUDENTS: 35 GRADE(S) 6<br />
DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 4/2-5/31/12<br />
NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />
STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 X STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4 X<br />
1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />
1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />
1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />
2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />
3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />
4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />
5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />
6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />
7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />
THE STUDENTS ENJOYED THIS OPPORTUNITY TO LEARN ABOUT<br />
FASHION DESIGN AND CREATE THEIR OWN DESIGNS.<br />
8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />
NONE<br />
9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />
NONE<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />
2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />
3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />
4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />
5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />
6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />
7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />
TEACHERS SHOULD PLAN FOR EXTRA SCHEDUALING SESSIONS.<br />
8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />
HAVE LESSONS WITH JUST TEACHERS TO LEARN TOOLS AND<br />
TECHNIQUES BEFORE WORKING WITH CHILDREN. ITEMIZE<br />
MATERIALS, TOOL LIST AND EXPENSES BEFORE SUBMITTING<br />
PROGRAM REQUEST.<br />
9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />
PLAN FAR IN ADVANCE AND LEAVE EXTRA TIME.<br />
3<br />
4<br />
3<br />
3<br />
N/<br />
2<br />
ARTIST: HAIFA BINT-KADI<br />
CONTRACT #: A8785<br />
TITLE OF PROGRAM: MOSAIC PROJECT<br />
TYPE OF PROGRAM: WORKSHOP<br />
DISTRICT/ SCHOOL:<br />
# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />
PELHAM/COLONIAL ELEM.<br />
# OF STUDENTS: 220 GRADE(S) 2-5<br />
DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 5/8-22/12<br />
NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />
STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 X STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4 X<br />
ARTIST: HANS WILHELM, INC.<br />
CONTRACT #: A7574<br />
TITLE OF PROGRAM: AUTHOR VISIT<br />
TYPE OF PROGRAM: ASSEMBLY<br />
DISTRICT/ SCHOOL:<br />
# OF TEACHERS: 6<br />
BYRAM HILLS/COMAN HILL ELEM.<br />
# OF STUDENTS: 180 GRADE(S) K<br />
DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 12/20/11<br />
NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />
STANDARD 1 STANDARD 2 STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />
1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />
1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />
1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />
2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />
3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />
4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />
5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />
6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />
7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />
THIS IS A VERY MEANINGFUL PROJECT. SHE IS A VERY INSPIRING<br />
ARTIST. GREAT WITH ALL AGES.<br />
8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />
SOMETIMES IT IS VERY DIFFICULT TO CONTACT HER AND IT TAKES<br />
A FEW DAYS FOR HER TO RESPOND.<br />
9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />
I HOPE WE CAN CONTINUE THIS PROJECT.<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />
2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />
3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />
4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />
5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />
6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />
7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />
AGAIN HE WOWED OUR STUDENTS. THE CHILDREN WERE<br />
MESMERIZED BY HIS STORYTELLING AND EXPERIENCES.<br />
8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />
NONE<br />
9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />
NONE<br />
4<br />
4<br />
4<br />
4<br />
4<br />
4<br />
Arts in Education Service - School Evaluations <strong>2011</strong>-<strong>2012</strong><br />
Page 117 of 332
ARTIST: HEATHER CAPRETTI<br />
CONTRACT #: A8176<br />
TITLE OF PROGRAM: TECH DIRECTOR FOR THE SHOW - ANNIE GET YOUR<br />
GUN<br />
TYPE OF PROGRAM: RESIDENCY<br />
DISTRICT/ SCHOOL:<br />
# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />
TUCKAHOE/TUCKAHOE MS & HS<br />
# OF STUDENTS: GRADE(S) 6-12<br />
DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 1/10-3/19/12<br />
NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />
STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 X STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />
1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />
ARTIST: HEIDI CAREY<br />
CONTRACT #: A7975<br />
TITLE OF PROGRAM: ARCHITECTURE AROUND US<br />
TYPE OF PROGRAM: WORKSHOP<br />
DISTRICT/ SCHOOL:<br />
# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />
PELHAM/COLONIAL ELEM.<br />
# OF STUDENTS: 10 GRADE(S) 2-5<br />
DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 12/2/11-2/10/12<br />
NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />
STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 X STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4 X<br />
1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />
1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />
2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />
3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />
4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />
5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />
6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />
7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />
HEATHER WORKED WELL WITH THE CHILDREN<br />
8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />
NONE<br />
9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />
NONE<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
N/<br />
1.<br />
2.<br />
3.<br />
4.<br />
5.<br />
6.<br />
STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />
ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />
EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />
ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />
TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />
QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
N/<br />
N/<br />
7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />
HEIDI IS A WARM, PLEASANT AND KNOWLEDGEABLE TEACHER.<br />
SHE KEPT THE CHILDREN ENGAGED WHILE LEARNING ABOUT<br />
ARCHITECTURE, BUILDING TYPES AND PARTS AND KEY STYLISTIC<br />
ELEMENTS.<br />
8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />
NONE<br />
9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />
NONE<br />
ARTIST: HEIDI CAREY<br />
CONTRACT #: A8370<br />
TITLE OF PROGRAM: ARCHITECTURE AROUND US<br />
TYPE OF PROGRAM: WORKSHOP<br />
DISTRICT/ SCHOOL:<br />
# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />
PELHAM/HUTCHINSON ELEM.<br />
# OF STUDENTS: 7 GRADE(S) K-5<br />
DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 2/6-3/12/12<br />
NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />
STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 X STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4 X<br />
ARTIST: HEIDI CAREY<br />
CONTRACT #: A7687<br />
TITLE OF PROGRAM: ARCHITECTURE AROUND US<br />
TYPE OF PROGRAM: WORKSHOP<br />
DISTRICT/ SCHOOL:<br />
# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />
PELHAM/SIWANOY ELEM.<br />
# OF STUDENTS: 9 GRADE(S) 3-5<br />
DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 10/3-12/5/11<br />
NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />
STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 X STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4 X<br />
1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />
1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />
1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />
2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />
3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />
4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />
5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />
6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />
2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />
3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />
4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />
5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />
6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM?<br />
HEIDI IS A PLEASURE TO WORK WITH.<br />
Y<br />
WHY?<br />
7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM?<br />
NONE<br />
Y<br />
WHY?<br />
8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />
NONE<br />
9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />
NONE<br />
8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />
NONE<br />
9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />
NONE<br />
Arts in Education Service - School Evaluations <strong>2011</strong>-<strong>2012</strong><br />
Page 118 of 332
ARTIST: HEIDI CAREY<br />
CONTRACT #: A8359<br />
TITLE OF PROGRAM: ARCHITECTURE AROUND US<br />
TYPE OF PROGRAM: WORKSHOP<br />
DISTRICT/ SCHOOL:<br />
# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />
PELHAM/SIWANOY ELEM.<br />
# OF STUDENTS: 9 GRADE(S) 3-5<br />
DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 2/1-4/4/12<br />
NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />
STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 X STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4 X<br />
ARTIST: HEIDI CAREY<br />
CONTRACT #: A7592<br />
TITLE OF PROGRAM: ARCHITECTURE AROUND US<br />
TYPE OF PROGRAM: WORKSHOP<br />
DISTRICT/ SCHOOL:<br />
# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />
PELHAM/HUTCHINSON ELEM.<br />
# OF STUDENTS: 11 GRADE(S) K-5<br />
DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 10/11-12/9/11<br />
NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />
STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 X STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4 X<br />
1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />
1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />
1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />
2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />
3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />
4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />
5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />
6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />
7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />
NONE<br />
8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />
NONE<br />
9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />
NONE<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
1.<br />
2.<br />
3.<br />
4.<br />
5.<br />
6.<br />
STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />
ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />
EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />
ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />
TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />
QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />
THIS WAS THE FIRST TIME WE OFFERED ARCHITECTURE AND THE<br />
STUDENTS RESPONSE WAS INCREDIBLE. HEIDI WAS EXTREMELY<br />
ORGANIZED AND HAD A WELL PLANNED CURRICULUM.<br />
8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />
NONE<br />
9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />
NONE<br />
ARTIST: HELEN LESTER<br />
CONTRACT #: A7674<br />
TITLE OF PROGRAM: AUTHOR VISIT<br />
TYPE OF PROGRAM: ASSEMBLY<br />
DISTRICT/ SCHOOL:<br />
# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />
SOMERS/PRIMROSE ELEM.<br />
# OF STUDENTS: 230 GRADE(S) 2<br />
DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 10/12/11<br />
NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />
STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />
ARTIST: HELEN LESTER<br />
CONTRACT #: A8492<br />
TITLE OF PROGRAM: AUTHOR VISIT<br />
TYPE OF PROGRAM: ASSEMBLY<br />
DISTRICT/ SCHOOL:<br />
# OF TEACHERS: 2<br />
NORTH SALEM/PQ ELEM.<br />
# OF STUDENTS: 120 GRADE(S) K<br />
DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 3/28/12<br />
NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />
STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />
1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />
1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />
1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />
2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />
3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />
4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />
5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />
6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />
2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />
3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />
4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />
5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />
6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />
4.5<br />
4.5<br />
5<br />
4.5<br />
4<br />
4.5<br />
7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM?<br />
WE LOVE HELEN AND TACKY.<br />
Y<br />
WHY?<br />
7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM?<br />
VERY AGE APPROPRIATE AND ENGAGING.<br />
Y<br />
WHY?<br />
8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />
NONE<br />
9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />
NONE<br />
8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />
NONE<br />
9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />
THANK YOU.<br />
Arts in Education Service - School Evaluations <strong>2011</strong>-<strong>2012</strong><br />
Page 119 of 332
ARTIST: HELEN LESTER<br />
CONTRACT #: A8154<br />
TITLE OF PROGRAM: AUTHOR VISIT<br />
TYPE OF PROGRAM: ASSEMBLY<br />
DISTRICT/ SCHOOL:<br />
# OF TEACHERS: 4<br />
CARMEL/PATERSON ELEM.<br />
# OF STUDENTS: 115 GRADE(S) K<br />
DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 3/22/12<br />
NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />
STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />
ARTIST: HIP PICKLES PERCUSSION<br />
CONTRACT #: A8085<br />
TITLE OF PROGRAM: STOP THE BULLYING SHOW<br />
TYPE OF PROGRAM: ASSEMBLY<br />
DISTRICT/ SCHOOL: KATONAH/LEWISBORO/MEADOWPOND ELEM.<br />
# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />
# OF STUDENTS: 340 GRADE(S) K-5<br />
DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 12/14/11<br />
NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />
STANDARD 1 STANDARD 2 STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />
1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />
1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />
1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />
2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />
3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />
4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />
5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />
6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />
7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />
SHE WAS A DELIGHT. THE CHILDREN LOVED HER AND HER<br />
WONDERFUL CHARACTERS.<br />
8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />
NONE<br />
9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />
I'D LOVE TO HAVE A PRINTABLE COLORING PAGE FOR MY<br />
CHILDREN TO USE AS A FOLLOW UP.<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />
2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />
3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />
4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />
5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />
6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />
7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? ? WHY?<br />
3<br />
3<br />
3<br />
3<br />
3<br />
N/<br />
PRESENTER WAS A BIT SLOPPY IN APPEARANCE. AT TIMES<br />
PERFORMANCE DRAGGED ESPECIALLY WITH YOUNGER AUDIENCE.<br />
8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />
FINE TUNE THE MESSAGE. DON'T ASK SINGLE STUDENTS TO<br />
DANCE IN FRONT OF CROWD ALONE.<br />
9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />
THE STUDENTS ENJOYED THE MUSICAL PART BUT SOME WERE<br />
UNABLE TO GET THE MESSAGE. IT WAS TOO SUTTLE.<br />
ARTIST: HIP PICKLES PERCUSSION<br />
CONTRACT #: A7772<br />
TITLE OF PROGRAM: STOP THE BULLYING SHOW<br />
TYPE OF PROGRAM: ASSEMBLY<br />
DISTRICT/ SCHOOL: PLEASANTVILLE/BEDFORD ROAD ELEM.<br />
# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />
# OF STUDENTS: 640 GRADE(S) K-4<br />
DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 10/12/11<br />
NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />
STANDARD 1 STANDARD 2 STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />
ARTIST: HIP PICKLES PERCUSSION<br />
CONTRACT #: A8870<br />
TITLE OF PROGRAM: STOP THE BULLYING SHOW<br />
TYPE OF PROGRAM: ASSEMBLY<br />
DISTRICT/ SCHOOL: NEW ROCHELLE/WARD ELEM. SCHOOL<br />
# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />
# OF STUDENTS: GRADE(S) K-2<br />
DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 6/5/12<br />
NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />
STANDARD 1 STANDARD 2 STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />
1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />
1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />
1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />
2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />
3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />
4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />
5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />
6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />
7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />
THE MESSAGE WAS EXCELLENT AND THE DRUMMING REALLY<br />
CAPTURED THE STUDENTS ATTENTION.<br />
8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />
THINGS WERE A BIT SLOW AND SOME CHILDREN BECAME<br />
UNFOCUSED. PERHAPS INFUSING MORE DRUMMING FOR THE<br />
YOUNGER AUDIENCE.<br />
9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />
OVERALL WONDERFUL PROGRAM.<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />
2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />
3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />
4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />
5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />
6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />
7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />
WE WOULD RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM TO OTHERS.<br />
8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />
ARTISTS SHOULD RELATE MUSICAL THEMES TO THAT OF SCHOOL<br />
AND OR GRADE LEVELS CURRICULUM THEMES.<br />
9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />
THE ASSEMBLY ENGAGED STUDENTS INTEREST. HOWEVER, MORE<br />
STRUCTURE IS NEEDED DURING THOSE SHORT INTERMISSIONS<br />
WHEN THE PERFORMERS ARE NOT PLAYING MUSIC.<br />
5<br />
3<br />
3<br />
3<br />
3<br />
2<br />
Arts in Education Service - School Evaluations <strong>2011</strong>-<strong>2012</strong><br />
Page 120 of 332
ARTIST: HIP PICKLES PERCUSSION<br />
CONTRACT #: A8767<br />
TITLE OF PROGRAM: STOP THE BULLYING SHOW<br />
TYPE OF PROGRAM: ASSEMBLY<br />
DISTRICT/ SCHOOL:<br />
# OF TEACHERS: 3<br />
MTP/HAWTHORNE ELEM.<br />
# OF STUDENTS: 423 GRADE(S) K-2<br />
DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 4/17/12<br />
NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />
STANDARD 1 STANDARD 2 STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />
ARTIST: HOPE DAVIS dba HOPE DAVIS FINE ART<br />
CONTRACT #: A7816<br />
TITLE OF PROGRAM: EYES ON ART<br />
TYPE OF PROGRAM: RESIDENCY<br />
DISTRICT/ SCHOOL:<br />
# OF TEACHERS: 24<br />
IRVINGTON/DOWS LANE ELEM.<br />
# OF STUDENTS: 500 GRADE(S) K-3<br />
DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 11/2 & 18/11<br />
NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />
STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 X STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />
1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />
1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />
1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />
2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />
3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />
4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />
5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />
6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />
5<br />
4<br />
4<br />
4<br />
4<br />
N/<br />
1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />
2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />
3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />
4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />
5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />
6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />
THE STUDENTS LOVED THE PERFORMANCE. THE MUSIC WAS<br />
GREAT AND THE PERFORMERS WERE ENTHUSIASTIC. THERE<br />
WERE OPPORTUNITIES FOR STUDENT PARTICIPATION<br />
THROUGHTOUT.<br />
8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />
THE PERFORMANCE COULD USE SOME EDITING IN ORDER TO<br />
MAKE IT LESS WORDY AND MORE CONCISE.<br />
9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />
NONE<br />
7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />
INTERACTIVE WITH STUDENTS. SOLIDIFIES ELEMENTS OF ART<br />
CURRICULUM.<br />
8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />
NONE<br />
9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />
NONE<br />
ARTIST: HOWARD KILIK<br />
CONTRACT #: A8349<br />
TITLE OF PROGRAM: MUSICAL DIRECTOR FOR SENIOR MUSICAL - XANADU<br />
TYPE OF PROGRAM: RESIDENCY<br />
DISTRICT/ SCHOOL: CHAPPAQUA/HORACE GREELEY HIGH SCHOOL<br />
# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />
# OF STUDENTS: 200 GRADE(S) 12<br />
DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 1/30-4/21/12<br />
NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />
STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 X STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />
ARTIST: HUDSON VAGABOND PUPPETS CONTRACT #: A8855<br />
TITLE OF PROGRAM: LOIS BOHEVESKY - MASKS & MYTHOLOGY<br />
TYPE OF PROGRAM: RESIDENCY<br />
DISTRICT/ SCHOOL: PLEASANTVILLE/PLEASANTVILLE MIDDLE SCHOOL<br />
# OF TEACHERS: 3<br />
# OF STUDENTS: 140 GRADE(S) 6<br />
DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 6/4-6/12<br />
NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />
STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 X STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4 X<br />
1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />
1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />
1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />
2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />
3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />
4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />
5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />
6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />
7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />
IMPORTANT FOR THE STUDENTS TO SEE HOW ALL THE<br />
COMPONENTS OF A MUSICAL SHOW COME TOGETHER.<br />
8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />
NONE<br />
9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />
HOWARD IS EXTREMELY TALENTED AND DEDICATED TO HIS<br />
CRAFT. HE IS AN EXCEPTIONAL MUSICAL DIRECTOR WITH A RARE<br />
GIFT OF BEING ABLE TO TEACH STUDENTS WITH VARYING LEVELS<br />
OF MUSICAL KNOWLEDGE AND ABILITIES.<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />
2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />
3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />
4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />
5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />
6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />
7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />
LOIS IS AN EXPERT IN HER FIELD. SHE KNOWS ACTING AND SHE<br />
KNOWS MYTHOLOGY.<br />
8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />
NONE<br />
9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />
NONE<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
Arts in Education Service - School Evaluations <strong>2011</strong>-<strong>2012</strong><br />
Page 121 of 332
ARTIST: HUDSON VALLEY SHAKESPEARE FESTI<br />
CONTRACT #: A8713<br />
TITLE OF PROGRAM: ACCESS SHAKESPEARE<br />
TYPE OF PROGRAM: ASSEMBLY<br />
DISTRICT/ SCHOOL: BYRAM HILLS/BYRAM HILLS HIGH SCHOOL<br />
# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />
# OF STUDENTS: 228 GRADE(S) 10<br />
DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 5/2/12<br />
NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />
STANDARD 1 STANDARD 2 STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4 X<br />
1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />
ARTIST: HUDSON VALLEY SHAKESPEARE FESTI CONTRACT #: A7908<br />
TITLE OF PROGRAM: FREE WILL SHAKESPEARE WORKSHOPS &<br />
PERFORMANCE<br />
TYPE OF PROGRAM: WORKSHOP<br />
DISTRICT/ SCHOOL: KATONAH/LEWISBORO/JOHN JAY HIGH SCHOOL<br />
# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />
# OF STUDENTS: 85 GRADE(S) 10<br />
DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 12/12-16/11<br />
NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />
STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4 X<br />
1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />
1.<br />
2.<br />
3.<br />
4.<br />
5.<br />
6.<br />
STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />
ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />
EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />
ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />
TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />
QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />
4<br />
5<br />
4<br />
5<br />
5<br />
N/<br />
7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />
THE PERFORMERS ALWAYS DO A BRILLIANT JOB MAKING THE<br />
PLAY ACCESSIBLE TO STUDENTS.<br />
8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />
IT MIGHT BE APPROPRIATE TO HAVE MORE QUESTIONS PREPARED.<br />
9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />
NONE<br />
1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />
2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />
3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />
4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />
5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />
6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />
7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />
THE PROGRAM OFFERED HANDS-ON ENGAGEMENT FOR<br />
STUDENTS. IT SERVED TO HELP THEM APPRECIATE<br />
SHAKESPEARS' LANGUAGE.<br />
8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />
NONE<br />
9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />
NONE<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
ARTIST: HUDSON VALLEY SHAKESPEARE FESTI CONTRACT #: A8122<br />
TITLE OF PROGRAM: FREE WILL WORKSHOPS / ROMEO & JULIET<br />
TYPE OF PROGRAM: ASSEMBLY/WORKSHOP<br />
DISTRICT/ SCHOOL: LAKELAND/LAKELAND HIGH SCHOOL<br />
# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />
# OF STUDENTS: GRADE(S) 9<br />
DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 3/8-4/26/12<br />
NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />
STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4 X<br />
ARTIST: HUDSON VALLEY SHAKESPEARE FESTI CONTRACT #: A8826<br />
TITLE OF PROGRAM: MIDSUMMER NIGHT'S DREAM<br />
TYPE OF PROGRAM: WORKSHOP<br />
DISTRICT/ SCHOOL: PLEASANTVILLE/PLEASANTVILLE MIDDLE SCHOOL<br />
# OF TEACHERS: 2<br />
# OF STUDENTS: 25 GRADE(S) 7<br />
DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 5/15-16/12<br />
NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />
STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 X STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4 X<br />
1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />
1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />
1.<br />
2.<br />
3.<br />
4.<br />
5.<br />
6.<br />
STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />
ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />
EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />
ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />
TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />
QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />
A TERRIFIC PROGRAM THAT REACHED OUT TO ALL STUDENTS AND<br />
GOT THEM INVOLVED AND EXCITED.<br />
8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />
NONE<br />
9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />
JUST KEEP ON COMING. WONDERFUL.<br />
1.<br />
2.<br />
3.<br />
4.<br />
5.<br />
6.<br />
STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />
ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />
EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />
ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />
TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />
QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />
4<br />
5<br />
5<br />
4<br />
4<br />
4<br />
7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />
WONDERFUL WORKSHOP, IT GAVE THE STUDENTS A GOOD GRASP<br />
OF SHAKESPEARE AND ACTING SKILLS.<br />
8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />
MAYBE NEXT TIME SPEND A BIT MORE TIME ON THE PLAY.<br />
9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />
THE STUDENTS HAD A GOOD TIME.<br />
Arts in Education Service - School Evaluations <strong>2011</strong>-<strong>2012</strong><br />
Page 122 of 332
ARTIST: HUDSON VALLEY SHAKESPEARE FESTI<br />
CONTRACT #: A8615<br />
TITLE OF PROGRAM: ROMEO & JULIET<br />
TYPE OF PROGRAM: ASSEMBLY<br />
DISTRICT/ SCHOOL:<br />
# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />
MTP/WESTLAKE MIDDLE SCHOOL<br />
# OF STUDENTS: GRADE(S) 8<br />
DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 5/11/12<br />
NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />
STANDARD 1 STANDARD 2 STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4 X<br />
ARTIST: HUDSON VALLEY SHAKESPEARE FESTI CONTRACT #: A8270B<br />
TITLE OF PROGRAM: SHAKESPEARE WORKSHOP<br />
TYPE OF PROGRAM: WORKSHOP<br />
DISTRICT/ SCHOOL: CHAPPAQUA/BELL MIDDLE SCHOOL<br />
# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />
# OF STUDENTS: 180 GRADE(S) 8<br />
DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 6/5 & 6/12<br />
NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />
STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 X STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4 X<br />
1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />
1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />
1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />
2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />
3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />
4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />
5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />
6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />
4<br />
5<br />
5<br />
4<br />
5<br />
N/<br />
1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />
2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />
3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />
4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />
5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />
6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
N/<br />
N/<br />
7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y<br />
THEY DID A GREAT JOB AND A NICE PERFORMANCE.<br />
WHY?<br />
7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM?<br />
CHILDREN RESPONDED VERY WELL TO ACTORS.<br />
Y<br />
WHY?<br />
8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />
MAYBE PROVIDE A STUDY GUIDE PRIOR TO THE SHOW.<br />
9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />
NONE<br />
8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />
NONE<br />
9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />
NONE<br />
ARTIST: HUDSON VALLEY SHAKESPEARE FESTI CONTRACT #: A8270A<br />
TITLE OF PROGRAM: SHAKESPEARE WORKSHOP<br />
TYPE OF PROGRAM: WORKSHOP<br />
DISTRICT/ SCHOOL: CHAPPAQUA/SEVEN BRIDGES MIDDLE SCHOOL<br />
# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />
# OF STUDENTS: 150 GRADE(S) 8<br />
DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 4/26 & 27/12<br />
NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />
STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4 X<br />
ARTIST: HUDSON VALLEY SHAKESPEARE FESTI CONTRACT #: A7649<br />
TITLE OF PROGRAM: STUDENTS ON STAGE<br />
TYPE OF PROGRAM: WORKSHOP<br />
DISTRICT/ SCHOOL: NEW ROCHELLE/JEFFERSON ELEM.<br />
# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />
# OF STUDENTS: 95 GRADE(S) 5<br />
DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 11/15 & 16/11<br />
NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />
STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4 X<br />
1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />
1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />
1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />
2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />
3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />
4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />
5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />
6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />
7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />
EXCELLENT INTRO TO PERFORMING PLAY.<br />
8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />
NONE<br />
9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />
NONE<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
N/<br />
1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />
2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />
3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />
4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />
5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />
6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />
7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />
THE ARTISTS WERE EXCEPTIONALLY WONDERFUL WITH THE<br />
STUDENTS. THE STUDENTS WERE ENGAGED AND INTERESTED.<br />
8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />
NONE<br />
9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />
FANTASTIC.<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
Arts in Education Service - School Evaluations <strong>2011</strong>-<strong>2012</strong><br />
Page 123 of 332
ARTIST: HUGA TUGA CREATIONS, LLC<br />
CONTRACT #: A7913<br />
TITLE OF PROGRAM: READING ROCKS SHOW<br />
TYPE OF PROGRAM: ASSEMBLY<br />
DISTRICT/ SCHOOL:<br />
# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />
OSSINING/BROOKSIDE ELEM.<br />
# OF STUDENTS: 720 GRADE(S) 1 & 2<br />
DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 11/18/11<br />
NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />
STANDARD 1 STANDARD 2 STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />
ARTIST: HUGA TUGA CREATIONS, LLC<br />
CONTRACT #: A7524<br />
TITLE OF PROGRAM: READING ROCKS SHOW<br />
TYPE OF PROGRAM: ASSEMBLY<br />
DISTRICT/ SCHOOL: LAKELAND/GEORGE WASHINGTON ELEM.<br />
# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />
# OF STUDENTS: 425 GRADE(S) K-5<br />
DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 9/21/11<br />
NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />
STANDARD 1 STANDARD 2 STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />
1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />
1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />
1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />
2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />
3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />
4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />
5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />
6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />
7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />
NONE<br />
8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />
NONE<br />
9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />
NONE<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />
2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />
3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />
4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />
5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />
6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />
7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />
VERY ENTHUSIASTIC PROGRAM, DEDICATED TO GETTING<br />
STUDENTS EXCITED ABOUT BOOKS AND READING.<br />
8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />
NONE<br />
9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />
JOE IS WONDERFUL TO WORK WITH. HE IS VERY ACCOMODATING<br />
IN SCHEDULING AND HE GIVES 100% TO HIS PROGRAM.<br />
5<br />
5<br />
4<br />
4<br />
4<br />
5<br />
ARTIST: HYPOTHETRICAL THEATRE COMPANY CONTRACT #: A7520<br />
TITLE OF PROGRAM: ELLIS ISLAND STORIES<br />
TYPE OF PROGRAM: ASSEMBLY<br />
DISTRICT/ SCHOOL:<br />
# OF TEACHERS: 5<br />
CHAPPAQUA/GRAFFLIN ELEM.<br />
# OF STUDENTS: 117 GRADE(S) 4<br />
DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 10/20/11<br />
NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />
STANDARD 1 STANDARD 2 STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4 X<br />
ARTIST: HYPOTHETRICAL THEATRE COMPANY CONTRACT #: A8587<br />
TITLE OF PROGRAM: ELLIS ISLAND STORIES<br />
TYPE OF PROGRAM: ASSEMBLY<br />
DISTRICT/ SCHOOL: CHAPPAQUA/ROARING BROOK ELEM.<br />
# OF TEACHERS: 5<br />
# OF STUDENTS: 92 GRADE(S) 4<br />
DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 5/22/12<br />
NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />
STANDARD 1 STANDARD 2 STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4 X<br />
1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />
1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />
1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />
2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />
3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />
4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />
5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />
6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />
7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />
BRINGS THE STUDY OF IMMIGRATION TO LIFE.<br />
8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />
NONE<br />
9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />
EXCELLENT.<br />
4<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
N/<br />
1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />
2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />
3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />
4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />
5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />
6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />
7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />
THOUGHTFUL AND ENGAGING.<br />
8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />
WE WERE HAPPY TO SEE THE NEW INSPECTOR WHO WAS MORE<br />
EASILY UNDERSTOOD AND SPOKE SLOWLY.<br />
9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />
A GREAT PROGRAM.<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
N/<br />
Arts in Education Service - School Evaluations <strong>2011</strong>-<strong>2012</strong><br />
Page 124 of 332
ARTIST: HYPOTHETRICAL THEATRE COMPANY CONTRACT #: A7646<br />
TITLE OF PROGRAM: ELLIS ISLAND STORIES<br />
TYPE OF PROGRAM: ASSEMBLY<br />
DISTRICT/ SCHOOL: CHAPPAQUA/WESTORCHARD ELEM.<br />
# OF TEACHERS: 6<br />
# OF STUDENTS: 123 GRADE(S) 4<br />
DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 10/6/11<br />
NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />
STANDARD 1 STANDARD 2 STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4 X<br />
ARTIST: IAN C. DRIVER<br />
CONTRACT #: A7545<br />
TITLE OF PROGRAM: DIRECTOR - FALL DRAMA<br />
TYPE OF PROGRAM: RESIDENCY<br />
DISTRICT/ SCHOOL: BRIARCLIFF/BRIARCLIFF HIGH SCHOOL<br />
# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />
# OF STUDENTS: GRADE(S) 9-12<br />
DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 9/6-11/21/11<br />
NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />
STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 X STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />
1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />
1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />
1.<br />
2.<br />
3.<br />
4.<br />
5.<br />
6.<br />
STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />
ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />
EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />
ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />
TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />
QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
N/<br />
7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />
IT IS A WONDERFUL SHOW THAT BRINGS THE IMMIGRATION STORY<br />
TO LIFE.<br />
8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />
NONE<br />
9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />
NONE<br />
ARTIST: IAN C. DRIVER<br />
CONTRACT #: A8124<br />
TITLE OF PROGRAM: DIRECTOR - SPRING MUSICAL<br />
TYPE OF PROGRAM: RESIDENCY<br />
DISTRICT/ SCHOOL:<br />
BRIARCLIFF/BRIARCLIFF MIDDLE SCHOOL<br />
# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />
# OF STUDENTS: 40 GRADE(S) 6-8<br />
DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE<br />
3/19-6/15/12<br />
NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />
STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 X STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />
1.<br />
2.<br />
3.<br />
4.<br />
5.<br />
6.<br />
STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />
ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />
EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />
ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />
TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />
QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
4<br />
7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />
HE DOES EXCELLENT WORK WITH OUR THEATRICAL PRODUCTION<br />
STUDENTS. HIS KNOWLEDGE AND INSIGHT OF STAGE CRAFT AND<br />
THEATRE IS EXCEPTIONAL. STUDENTS GROW FROM AND ENJOY<br />
HIS WORK.<br />
8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />
NONE<br />
9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />
ARTIST:<br />
NONE<br />
IAN C. DRIVER<br />
TITLE OF PROGRAM: DIRECTOR - WINTER MUSICAL<br />
TYPE OF PROGRAM: RESIDENCY<br />
DISTRICT/ SCHOOL:<br />
BRIARCLIFF/BRIARCLIFF HIGH SCHOOL<br />
CONTRACT #: A7719<br />
# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />
# OF STUDENTS: GRADE(S) 9-12<br />
DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE<br />
12/1/11-3/16/12<br />
NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />
STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 X STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />
1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />
1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />
1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />
2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />
3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />
4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />
5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />
6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />
2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />
3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />
4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />
5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />
6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
4<br />
5<br />
7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM?<br />
NONE<br />
8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />
NONE<br />
9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />
NONE<br />
Y<br />
WHY?<br />
7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />
IAN HAS FANTASTIC VISION AND INSIGHT. AN UNKNOWN SHOW<br />
BECAME AN EXCELLENT EXPERIENCE.<br />
8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />
NONE<br />
9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />
NONE<br />
Arts in Education Service - School Evaluations <strong>2011</strong>-<strong>2012</strong><br />
Page 125 of 332
ARTIST: IDA MOLDONADO<br />
CONTRACT #: A7613<br />
TITLE OF PROGRAM: TILE ART<br />
TYPE OF PROGRAM: WORKSHOP<br />
DISTRICT/ SCHOOL:<br />
# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />
PELHAM/HUTCHINSON ELEM.<br />
# OF STUDENTS: 9 GRADE(S) 3-5<br />
DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 10/11-11/22/11<br />
NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />
STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 X STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />
ARTIST: IRA McINTOSH<br />
CONTRACT #: A8475<br />
TITLE OF PROGRAM: CATSKILL MOUNTAIN MUSIC TWIST & TROUT<br />
TYPE OF PROGRAM: ASSEMBLY<br />
DISTRICT/ SCHOOL: LAKELAND/COPPER BEECH MIDDLE SCHOOL<br />
# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />
# OF STUDENTS: 50 GRADE(S) 7<br />
DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 4/30/12<br />
NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />
STANDARD 1 STANDARD 2 STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4 X<br />
1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />
1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />
1.<br />
2.<br />
3.<br />
4.<br />
5.<br />
6.<br />
STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />
ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />
EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />
ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />
TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />
QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />
SHE WAS A PLEASURE TO WORK WITH. THE STUDENTS ENJOYED<br />
THE END RESULT.<br />
8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />
NONE<br />
9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />
NONE<br />
1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />
2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />
3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />
4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />
5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />
6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />
7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />
IRA OBVIOUSLY LOVES WHAT HE DOES AND TRANSMITS THAT<br />
ENERGY AND EXCITEMENT TO THE STUDENTS. THE SONGS HE<br />
CHOSE FOR THE DAY SUPPORTED WHAT WE ARE LEARNING IN<br />
CLASS.<br />
8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />
NONE<br />
9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />
HOPE WE CAN GET HIM BACK NEXT YEAR.<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
ARTIST: J. HENRY FAIR, LLC CONTRACT #: A8669<br />
TITLE OF PROGRAM: VISUAL ARTIST - PHOTOGRAPHER / INDUSTRIAL<br />
SCARS<br />
TYPE OF PROGRAM: ASSEMBLY<br />
DISTRICT/ SCHOOL: KATONAH/LEWISBORO/JOHN JAY HIGH SCHOOL<br />
# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />
# OF STUDENTS: 87 GRADE(S) 11 & 12<br />
DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 3/19/12<br />
NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />
STANDARD 1 STANDARD 2 STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />
1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />
ARTIST: JACOB GREENE<br />
CONTRACT #: A8836<br />
TITLE OF PROGRAM: SOUND DESIGNER FOR THE SPRING CONCERT<br />
TYPE OF PROGRAM: RESIDENCY<br />
DISTRICT/ SCHOOL: KATONAH/LEWISBORO/JOHN JAY HIGH SCHOOL<br />
# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />
# OF STUDENTS: 450 GRADE(S) 9-12<br />
DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 5/23-6/4/12<br />
NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />
STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 X STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />
1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />
1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />
2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />
3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />
4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />
5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />
6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />
7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />
OPENED STUDENTS EYES TO LANDSCAPE DESTRUCTION BY<br />
INDUSTRIALIZATION ANDTECHNOLOGY.<br />
8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />
NONE<br />
9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />
THE STUDENTS LOVED THE PRESENTATION.<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />
2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />
3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />
4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />
5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />
6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />
7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />
NONE<br />
8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />
NONE<br />
9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />
NONE<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
Arts in Education Service - School Evaluations <strong>2011</strong>-<strong>2012</strong><br />
Page 126 of 332
ARTIST: JACOB GREENE<br />
CONTRACT #: A8164<br />
TITLE OF PROGRAM: SOUND DESIGNER FOR THE WINTER CONCERT<br />
TYPE OF PROGRAM: RESIDENCY<br />
DISTRICT/ SCHOOL: KATONAH/LEWISBORO/JOHN JAY HIGH SCHOOL<br />
# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />
# OF STUDENTS: 400 GRADE(S) 9-12<br />
DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 1/9-30/12<br />
NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />
STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 X STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />
ARTIST: JACQUELINE SOCCODATO<br />
CONTRACT #: A7617D<br />
TITLE OF PROGRAM: BALLROOM DANCING<br />
TYPE OF PROGRAM: WORKSHOP<br />
DISTRICT/ SCHOOL:<br />
# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />
PELHAM/HUTCHINSON ELEM.<br />
# OF STUDENTS: 13 GRADE(S) 4 & 5<br />
DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 10/12-11/23/11<br />
NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />
STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 X STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4 X<br />
1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />
1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />
1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />
2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />
3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />
4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />
5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />
6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />
7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />
NONE<br />
8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />
NONE<br />
9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />
NONE<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
1.<br />
2.<br />
3.<br />
4.<br />
5.<br />
6.<br />
STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />
ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />
EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />
ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />
TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />
QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />
TREMENDOUS TURNOUT FROM STUDENTS. THEY LOOK FORWARD<br />
TO LEARNING NEW STEPS WEEK AFTER WEEK.<br />
8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />
NONE<br />
9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />
NONE<br />
ARTIST: JACQUELINE SOCCODATO<br />
CONTRACT #: A8368D<br />
TITLE OF PROGRAM: BALLROOM DANCING<br />
TYPE OF PROGRAM: WORKSHOP<br />
DISTRICT/ SCHOOL:<br />
# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />
PELHAM/HUTCHINSON ELEM.<br />
# OF STUDENTS: 9 GRADE(S) 4 & 5<br />
DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 2/8-4/4/12<br />
NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />
STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 X STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4 X<br />
ARTIST: JACQUELINE SOCCODATO<br />
CONTRACT #: A7617A<br />
TITLE OF PROGRAM: EVERY DAY ART I<br />
TYPE OF PROGRAM: WORKSHOP<br />
DISTRICT/ SCHOOL:<br />
# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />
PELHAM/HUTCHINSON ELEM.<br />
# OF STUDENTS: 12 GRADE(S) 4 & 5<br />
DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 10/11-11/22/11<br />
NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />
STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 X STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />
1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />
1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />
1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />
2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />
3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />
4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />
5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />
6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />
2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />
3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />
4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />
5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />
6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />
GREAT ADDITION TO EXISTING CURRICULUM. BOTH BOYS AND<br />
GIRLS PARTICIPATED.<br />
8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />
NONE<br />
9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />
NONE<br />
7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />
THIS CONTINUES TO BE ONE OF THE MORE POPULAR CLASSES.<br />
STUDENTS LOVE TO SEE WHAT THEY CAN CREATE USING<br />
EVERYDAY ITEMS.<br />
8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />
NONE<br />
9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />
NONE<br />
Arts in Education Service - School Evaluations <strong>2011</strong>-<strong>2012</strong><br />
Page 127 of 332
ARTIST: JACQUELINE SOCCODATO<br />
CONTRACT #: A8368A<br />
TITLE OF PROGRAM: EVERY DAY ART I<br />
TYPE OF PROGRAM: WORKSHOP<br />
DISTRICT/ SCHOOL:<br />
# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />
PELHAM/HUTCHINSON ELEM.<br />
# OF STUDENTS: 12 GRADE(S) 4 & 5<br />
DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 2/3-3/30/12<br />
NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />
STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 X STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />
ARTIST: JACQUELINE SOCCODATO<br />
CONTRACT #: A7617B<br />
TITLE OF PROGRAM: EVERY DAY ART II<br />
TYPE OF PROGRAM: WORKSHOP<br />
DISTRICT/ SCHOOL:<br />
# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />
PELHAM/HUTCHINSON ELEM.<br />
# OF STUDENTS: 12 GRADE(S) 2 & 3<br />
DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 10/13-12/8/11<br />
NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />
STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 X STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />
1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />
1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />
1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />
2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />
3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />
4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />
5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />
6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />
7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />
STUDENTS LOVED IT.<br />
8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />
NONE<br />
9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />
NONE<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
1.<br />
2.<br />
3.<br />
4.<br />
5.<br />
6.<br />
STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />
ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />
EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />
ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />
TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />
QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />
JACQUELINE IS ORGANIZED AND PUNCTUAL. THE STUDENTS LOVE<br />
TO SEE WHAT THEY CAN CREATE OUT OF EVERYDAY ITEMS.<br />
8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />
NONE<br />
9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />
NONE<br />
ARTIST: JACQUELINE SOCCODATO<br />
CONTRACT #: A8368B<br />
TITLE OF PROGRAM: EVERY DAY ART II<br />
TYPE OF PROGRAM: WORKSHOP<br />
DISTRICT/ SCHOOL:<br />
# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />
PELHAM/HUTCHINSON ELEM.<br />
# OF STUDENTS: 12 GRADE(S) K & 1<br />
DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 2/9-4/5/12<br />
NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />
STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 X STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />
ARTIST: JACQUELINE SOCCODATO<br />
CONTRACT #: A8368C<br />
TITLE OF PROGRAM: EVERY DAY ART III<br />
TYPE OF PROGRAM: WORKSHOP<br />
DISTRICT/ SCHOOL:<br />
# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />
PELHAM/HUTCHINSON ELEM.<br />
# OF STUDENTS: 12 GRADE(S) 2 & 3<br />
DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 2/14-4/3/12<br />
NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />
STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 X STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />
1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />
1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />
1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />
2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />
3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />
4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />
5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />
6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />
7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />
GREAT INTRODUCTION TO ART FOR YOUNG STUDENTS.<br />
8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />
NONE<br />
9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />
NONE<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
1.<br />
2.<br />
3.<br />
4.<br />
5.<br />
6.<br />
STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />
ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />
EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />
ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />
TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />
QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />
THIS CLASS CONTINUES TO BE THE MOST POPULAR YEAR AFTER<br />
YEAR.<br />
8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />
NONE<br />
9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />
NONE<br />
Arts in Education Service - School Evaluations <strong>2011</strong>-<strong>2012</strong><br />
Page 128 of 332
ARTIST: JACQUELINE SOCCODATO<br />
CONTRACT #: A7617C<br />
TITLE OF PROGRAM: EVERY DAY ART III<br />
TYPE OF PROGRAM: WORKSHOP<br />
DISTRICT/ SCHOOL:<br />
# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />
PELHAM/HUTCHINSON ELEM.<br />
# OF STUDENTS: 13 GRADE(S) K & 1<br />
DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 10/17-12/5/11<br />
NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />
STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 X STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />
ARTIST: JACQUELINE WOODSON, LLC<br />
CONTRACT #: A8305<br />
TITLE OF PROGRAM: AUTHOR VISIT<br />
TYPE OF PROGRAM: ASSEMBLY<br />
DISTRICT/ SCHOOL: NEW ROCHELLE/ISAAC YOUNG MIDDLE SCHOOL<br />
# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />
# OF STUDENTS: GRADE(S) 6-8<br />
DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 1/31/12<br />
NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />
STANDARD 1 STANDARD 2 STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />
1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />
1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />
1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />
2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />
3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />
4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />
5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />
6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />
7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />
STUDENTS CONTINUE TO LOVE THIS CLASS. JACQUELINE IS A<br />
PLEASURE TO WORK WITH AND AN ASSET TO OUR PROGRAM.<br />
8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />
NONE<br />
9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />
NONE<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
1.<br />
2.<br />
3.<br />
4.<br />
5.<br />
6.<br />
STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />
ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />
EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />
ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />
TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />
QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />
THE STUDENTS WERE ABLE TO CONNECT WITH HER AND SHE WITH<br />
THEM.<br />
8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />
NONE<br />
9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />
VERY DOWN TO EARTH, A LOVELY PERSON.<br />
ARTIST: JACQUELINE ZERRATE<br />
CONTRACT #: A8207<br />
TITLE OF PROGRAM: SPANISH ART, CULTURE & LANGUAGE<br />
TYPE OF PROGRAM: WORKSHOP<br />
DISTRICT/ SCHOOL: CHAPPAQUA/ROARING BROOK ELEM.<br />
# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />
# OF STUDENTS: 9 GRADE(S) 2-4<br />
DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 1/13-3/9/12<br />
NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />
STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 X STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4 X<br />
ARTIST: JACQUELINE ZERRATE<br />
CONTRACT #: A8279A<br />
TITLE OF PROGRAM: SPANISH ART, CULTURE & LANGUAGE I<br />
TYPE OF PROGRAM: WORKSHOP<br />
DISTRICT/ SCHOOL: KATONAH/LEWISBORO/KATONAH ELEM. SCHOOL<br />
# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />
# OF STUDENTS: 9 GRADE(S) 1-3<br />
DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 1/17-3/13/12<br />
NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />
STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 X STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4 X<br />
1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />
1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />
1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />
2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />
3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />
4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />
5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />
6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />
4<br />
5<br />
4<br />
4<br />
5<br />
4<br />
1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />
2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />
3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />
4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />
5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />
6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />
JACKIE MAKES ALL CLASSES INTERESTING WITH PUPPETS,<br />
PROJECTS, ETC.<br />
8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />
NONE<br />
9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />
NONE<br />
7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM?<br />
EXCELLENT TEACHER. EXCELLENT CLASS.<br />
8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />
NONE<br />
9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />
NONE<br />
Y<br />
WHY?<br />
Arts in Education Service - School Evaluations <strong>2011</strong>-<strong>2012</strong><br />
Page 129 of 332
ARTIST: JACQUELINE ZERRATE<br />
CONTRACT #: A8264A<br />
TITLE OF PROGRAM: SPANISH ART, CULTURE & LANGUAGE I<br />
TYPE OF PROGRAM: WORKSHOP<br />
DISTRICT/ SCHOOL:<br />
# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />
NORTH SALEM/PQ ELEM.<br />
# OF STUDENTS: 9 GRADE(S) 1 & 2<br />
DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 1/23-3/19/12<br />
NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />
STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 X STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4 X<br />
ARTIST: JACQUELINE ZERRATE<br />
CONTRACT #: A8741A<br />
TITLE OF PROGRAM: SPANISH ART, CULTURE & LANGUAGE I<br />
TYPE OF PROGRAM: WORKSHOP<br />
DISTRICT/ SCHOOL:<br />
# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />
NORTH SALEM/PQ ELEM.<br />
# OF STUDENTS: 9 GRADE(S) 1 & 2<br />
DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 4/16-6/11/12<br />
NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />
STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 X STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4 X<br />
1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />
1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />
1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />
2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />
3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />
4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />
5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />
6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />
2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />
3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />
4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />
5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />
6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM?<br />
NONE<br />
Y<br />
WHY?<br />
7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM?<br />
NONE<br />
Y<br />
WHY?<br />
8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />
NONE<br />
9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />
NONE<br />
8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />
NONE<br />
9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />
NONE<br />
ARTIST: JACQUELINE ZERRATE<br />
CONTRACT #: A7984AB<br />
TITLE OF PROGRAM: SPANISH ART, CULTURE & LANGUAGE I + II<br />
TYPE OF PROGRAM: WORKSHOP<br />
DISTRICT/ SCHOOL: KATONAH/LEWISBORO/INCREASE MILLER ELEM.<br />
# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />
# OF STUDENTS: 16 GRADE(S) 1-5<br />
DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 12/12/11-3/16/12<br />
NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />
STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 X STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4 X<br />
ARTIST: JACQUELINE ZERRATE<br />
CONTRACT #: A7502AB<br />
TITLE OF PROGRAM: SPANISH ART, CULTURE & LANGUAGE I + II<br />
TYPE OF PROGRAM: WORKSHOP<br />
DISTRICT/ SCHOOL: KATONAH/LEWISBORO/INCREASE MILLER ELEM.<br />
# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />
# OF STUDENTS: 8 GRADE(S) 1-5<br />
DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 10/7-12/23/11<br />
NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />
STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 X STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4 X<br />
1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />
1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />
1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />
2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />
3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />
4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />
5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />
6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />
2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />
3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />
4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />
5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />
6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y<br />
WE ARE SO LUCKY TO HAVE HER TEACHING HERE.<br />
WHY?<br />
7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />
SHE IS A WONDERFUL TEACHER WITH A LOT OF EXPERIENCE.<br />
8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />
NONE<br />
9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />
NONE<br />
8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />
NONE<br />
9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />
NONE<br />
Arts in Education Service - School Evaluations <strong>2011</strong>-<strong>2012</strong><br />
Page 130 of 332
ARTIST: JACQUELINE ZERRATE<br />
CONTRACT #: A8279B<br />
TITLE OF PROGRAM: SPANISH ART, CULTURE & LANGUAGE II<br />
TYPE OF PROGRAM: WORKSHOP<br />
DISTRICT/ SCHOOL: KATONAH/LEWISBORO/KATONAH ELEM. SCHOOL<br />
# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />
# OF STUDENTS: 9 GRADE(S) 2-4<br />
DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 1/18-3/14/12<br />
NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />
STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 X STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4 X<br />
ARTIST: JACQUELINE ZERRATE<br />
CONTRACT #: A8693B<br />
TITLE OF PROGRAM: SPANISH ART, CULTURE & LANGUAGE II<br />
TYPE OF PROGRAM: WORKSHOP<br />
DISTRICT/ SCHOOL: KATONAH/LEWISBORO/KATONAH ELEM. SCHOOL<br />
# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />
# OF STUDENTS: 8 GRADE(S) 2-4<br />
DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 4/11-5/30/12<br />
NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />
STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 X STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4 X<br />
1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />
1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />
1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />
2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />
3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />
4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />
5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />
6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />
2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />
3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />
4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />
5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />
6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM?<br />
EXCELLENT TEACHER. EXCELLENT CLASS.<br />
8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />
NONE<br />
9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />
NONE<br />
Y<br />
WHY?<br />
7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />
SHE IS ENTHUSIASTIC, DEPENDABLE AND THE STUDENTS LIKED<br />
HER.<br />
8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />
NONE<br />
9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />
NONE<br />
ARTIST: JACQUELINE ZERRATE<br />
CONTRACT #: A8264B<br />
TITLE OF PROGRAM: SPANISH ART, CULTURE & LANGUAGE II<br />
TYPE OF PROGRAM: WORKSHOP<br />
DISTRICT/ SCHOOL:<br />
# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />
NORTH SALEM/PQ ELEM.<br />
# OF STUDENTS: 9 GRADE(S) 1 & 2<br />
DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 1/24-3/20/12<br />
NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />
STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 X STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4 X<br />
ARTIST: JACQUELINE ZERRATE<br />
CONTRACT #: A7623B<br />
TITLE OF PROGRAM: SPANISH ART, CULTURE & LANGUAGE II<br />
TYPE OF PROGRAM: WORKSHOP<br />
DISTRICT/ SCHOOL:<br />
# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />
NORTH SALEM/PQ ELEM.<br />
# OF STUDENTS: 10 GRADE(S) 3-5<br />
DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 10/4-11/22/11<br />
NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />
STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 X STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4 X<br />
1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />
1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />
1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />
2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />
3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />
4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />
5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />
6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />
2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />
3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />
4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />
5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />
6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM?<br />
NONE<br />
Y<br />
WHY?<br />
7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM?<br />
NONE<br />
Y<br />
WHY?<br />
8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />
NONE<br />
9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />
NONE<br />
8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />
NONE<br />
9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />
NONE<br />
Arts in Education Service - School Evaluations <strong>2011</strong>-<strong>2012</strong><br />
Page 131 of 332
ARTIST: JACQUELINE ZERRATE<br />
CONTRACT #: A8741C<br />
TITLE OF PROGRAM: SPANISH ART, CULTURE & LANGUAGE III<br />
TYPE OF PROGRAM: WORKSHOP<br />
DISTRICT/ SCHOOL:<br />
# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />
NORTH SALEM/PQ ELEM.<br />
# OF STUDENTS: 9 GRADE(S) 1-5<br />
DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 4/19-6/7/12<br />
NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />
STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 X STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4 X<br />
ARTIST: JACQUELINE ZERRATE<br />
CONTRACT #: A8264C<br />
TITLE OF PROGRAM: SPANISH ART, CULTURE & LANGUAGE III<br />
TYPE OF PROGRAM: WORKSHOP<br />
DISTRICT/ SCHOOL:<br />
# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />
NORTH SALEM/PQ ELEM.<br />
# OF STUDENTS: 9 GRADE(S) 1 & 5<br />
DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 1/26-3/29/12<br />
NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />
STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 X STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4 X<br />
1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />
1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />
1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />
2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />
3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />
4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />
5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />
6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />
2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />
3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />
4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />
5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />
6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM?<br />
NONE<br />
Y<br />
WHY?<br />
7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM?<br />
NONE<br />
Y<br />
WHY?<br />
8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />
NONE<br />
9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />
NONE<br />
8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />
NONE<br />
9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />
NONE<br />
ARTIST: JACQUELINE ZERRATE<br />
CONTRACT #: A8279C<br />
TITLE OF PROGRAM: SPANISH ART, CULTURE & LANGUAGE III<br />
TYPE OF PROGRAM: WORKSHOP<br />
DISTRICT/ SCHOOL: KATONAH/LEWISBORO/KATONAH ELEM. SCHOOL<br />
# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />
# OF STUDENTS: 7 GRADE(S) 3-5<br />
DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 1/19-3/15/12<br />
NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />
STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 X STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4 X<br />
ARTIST: JACQUELINE ZERRATE<br />
CONTRACT #: A7984CD<br />
TITLE OF PROGRAM: SPANISH ART, CULTURE & LANGUAGE III + IV<br />
TYPE OF PROGRAM: WORKSHOP<br />
DISTRICT/ SCHOOL: KATONAH/LEWISBORO/INCREASE MILLER ELEM.<br />
# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />
# OF STUDENTS: 16 GRADE(S) 1-5<br />
DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 3/19-6/15/12<br />
NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />
STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 X STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4 X<br />
1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />
1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />
1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />
2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />
3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />
4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />
5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />
6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />
2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />
3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />
4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />
5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />
6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM?<br />
EXCELLENT TEACHER. EXCELLENT CLASS.<br />
Y<br />
WHY?<br />
7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM?<br />
NONE<br />
Y<br />
WHY?<br />
8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />
NONE<br />
9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />
NONE<br />
8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />
NONE<br />
9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />
NONE<br />
Arts in Education Service - School Evaluations <strong>2011</strong>-<strong>2012</strong><br />
Page 132 of 332
ARTIST: JAHPAN ENTERTAINMENT, INC. CONTRACT #: A8849<br />
TITLE OF PROGRAM: CARIBBEAN STEEL DRUM SHOW<br />
TYPE OF PROGRAM: ASSEMBLY<br />
DISTRICT/ SCHOOL:<br />
# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />
BRIARCLIFF/TODD ELEM.<br />
# OF STUDENTS: 112 GRADE(S) 5<br />
DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 5/31/12<br />
NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />
STANDARD 1 STANDARD 2 STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4 X<br />
ARTIST: JAMES B. TAYLOR<br />
CONTRACT #: A8403<br />
TITLE OF PROGRAM: TALES OF SLAVERY IN NEW YORK<br />
TYPE OF PROGRAM: WORKSHOP<br />
DISTRICT/ SCHOOL: PUTNAM VALLEY/PUTNAM VALLEY ELEM.<br />
# OF TEACHERS: 4<br />
# OF STUDENTS: 15 GRADE(S) 4<br />
DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 2/10/12<br />
NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />
STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 X STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4 X<br />
1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />
1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />
1.<br />
2.<br />
3.<br />
4.<br />
5.<br />
6.<br />
STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />
ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />
EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />
ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />
TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />
QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />
STUDENTS WERE VERY ENTHUSIASTIC AND ACTIVELY ENGAGED IN<br />
THE PROGRAM.<br />
8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />
NONE<br />
9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />
LOOKING FORWARD TO HAVING THEM BACK.<br />
1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />
2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />
3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />
4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />
5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />
6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />
7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />
GREAT PROGRAM - TIES INTO 4TH GRADE CURRICULUM.<br />
8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />
NONE<br />
9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />
WE HAVE HIM BACK ALMOST EVERY YEAR.<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
N/<br />
ARTIST: JAMES B. TAYLOR<br />
CONTRACT #: A7528<br />
TITLE OF PROGRAM: TALES OF SLAVERY IN THE NORTH<br />
TYPE OF PROGRAM: ASSEMBLY/WORKSHOP<br />
DISTRICT/ SCHOOL:<br />
# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />
LAKELAND/VAN CORT ELEM.<br />
# OF STUDENTS: 125 GRADE(S) 4<br />
DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 2/15 & 16/12<br />
NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />
STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 X STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4 X<br />
1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />
ARTIST: JAMES BRITT<br />
CONTRACT #: A8160<br />
TITLE OF PROGRAM: SET DESIGNER FOR THE SHOW - BEAUTY AND THE<br />
BEAST<br />
TYPE OF PROGRAM: RESIDENCY<br />
DISTRICT/ SCHOOL: PLEASANTVILLE/PLEASANTVILLE HIGH SCHOOL<br />
# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />
# OF STUDENTS: 1000 GRADE(S) 9-12<br />
DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 1/3-3/10/12<br />
NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />
STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 X STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />
1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />
1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />
2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />
3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />
4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />
5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />
6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />
7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />
MR. TAYLOR HAS A GREAT MANNER WITH CHILDREN AND HIS<br />
PRESENTATION HAD A GOOD OVER VIEW OF SLAVERY IN NEW<br />
YORK.<br />
8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />
NONE<br />
9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />
I HOPE HE COMES BACK NEXT YEAR.<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
1.<br />
2.<br />
3.<br />
4.<br />
5.<br />
6.<br />
STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />
ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />
EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />
ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />
TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />
QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />
HAVING A SET DESIGNER WAS AN EDUCATIONAL BENEFIT TO<br />
EVERYONE INVOLVED IN THIS PRODUCTION. HE WORKED CLOSELY<br />
WITH THE SET BUILDERS, STUDENT CREW AND DIRECTOR.<br />
8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />
NONE<br />
9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />
NONE<br />
Arts in Education Service - School Evaluations <strong>2011</strong>-<strong>2012</strong><br />
Page 133 of 332
ARTIST: JAMES HOWE<br />
CONTRACT #: A7514<br />
TITLE OF PROGRAM: AUTHOR VISIT<br />
TYPE OF PROGRAM: ASSEMBLY/WORKSHOP<br />
DISTRICT/ SCHOOL: PUTNAM VALLEY/PUTNAM VALLEY ELEM.<br />
# OF TEACHERS: 5<br />
# OF STUDENTS: 150 GRADE(S) 7<br />
DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 1/25/12<br />
NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />
STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />
ARTIST: JAMES LINEHAN<br />
CONTRACT #: A8223<br />
TITLE OF PROGRAM: JIM LINEHAN DANCE TROUPE<br />
TYPE OF PROGRAM: ASSEMBLY<br />
DISTRICT/ SCHOOL: CHAPPAQUA/SEVEN BRIDGES MIDDLE SCHOOL<br />
# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />
# OF STUDENTS: 150 GRADE(S) 7<br />
DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 2/27/12<br />
NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />
STANDARD 1 STANDARD 2 STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4 X<br />
1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />
1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />
1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />
2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />
3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />
4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />
5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />
6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />
7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />
HE IS A BRILLIANT AUTHOR, SPEAKER AND HUMAN BEING.<br />
8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />
NONE<br />
9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />
HE GETS THE STUDENTS TO REALLY THINK.<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />
2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />
3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />
4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />
5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />
6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />
7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />
THE DANCING WAS TERRIFIC, HIGH ENERGY, ENGAGING, AND THE<br />
STORIES WERE SPOT ON RELEVANT AND AGE APPROPRIATE.<br />
8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />
LIP SYNCING DURING PERFORMANCE WAS OBVIOUS AND<br />
UNWARRANTED.<br />
9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />
NOT SURE DISTRIBUTING BUSINESS CARDS WAS APPROPRIATE.<br />
OVERALL THE GROUP DID ENGAGE THE STUDENTS AND GET THEM<br />
ON THEIR FEET TO SING, DANCE AND HOPEFULLY THINK ABOUT<br />
HOW TO TREAT EACH OTHER.<br />
4<br />
4<br />
3<br />
4<br />
3<br />
N/<br />
ARTIST: JAMES LINEHAN<br />
CONTRACT #: A8727<br />
TITLE OF PROGRAM: JIM LINEHAN DANCE TROUPE<br />
TYPE OF PROGRAM: ASSEMBLY<br />
DISTRICT/ SCHOOL: GREENBURGH #7/WOODLANDS MIDDLE SCHOOL<br />
# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />
# OF STUDENTS: 210 GRADE(S) 7 & 8<br />
DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 5/30/12<br />
NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />
STANDARD 1 STANDARD 2 STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4 X<br />
1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />
ARTIST: JAMES OSBORN<br />
CONTRACT #: A8749<br />
TITLE OF PROGRAM: TRUMPET PLAYER FOR THE SHOW - A FUNNY THING<br />
HAPPENED ON THE WAY TO THE FORUM<br />
TYPE OF PROGRAM: ASSEMBLY<br />
DISTRICT/ SCHOOL: PUTNAM VALLEY/PUTNAM VALLEY HIGH SCHOOL<br />
# OF TEACHERS: 3<br />
# OF STUDENTS: 400 GRADE(S) 9-12<br />
DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 4/13-23/12<br />
NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />
STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />
1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />
1.<br />
2.<br />
3.<br />
4.<br />
5.<br />
6.<br />
STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />
ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />
EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />
ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />
TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />
QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
N/<br />
7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />
THIS SHOW IS SO DYNAMIC. THE DANCE FORM VERY<br />
CONTEMPORARY AND COMPELLING. BY THE TIME THE ARTISTS<br />
DEALT WITH BULLYING, THE STUDENTS WERE TOTALLY ENGAGED.<br />
8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />
NONE<br />
9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />
NONE<br />
1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />
2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />
3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />
4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />
5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />
6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />
7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />
NONE<br />
8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />
NONE<br />
9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />
NONE<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
N/<br />
Arts in Education Service - School Evaluations <strong>2011</strong>-<strong>2012</strong><br />
Page 134 of 332
ARTIST: JAMES P. KEYES<br />
CONTRACT #: A7727<br />
TITLE OF PROGRAM: COLONIAL DAY MUSIC<br />
TYPE OF PROGRAM: ASSEMBLY<br />
DISTRICT/ SCHOOL: KATONAH/LEWISBORO/KATONAH ELEM. SCHOOL<br />
# OF TEACHERS: 4<br />
# OF STUDENTS: 84 GRADE(S) 4<br />
DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 5/23/12<br />
NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />
STANDARD 1 STANDARD 2 STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4 X<br />
1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />
ARTIST: JAMES PANZER<br />
CONTRACT #: A8379<br />
TITLE OF PROGRAM: PRODUCTION DESIGNER FOR THE SHOW - GUYS &<br />
DOLLS<br />
TYPE OF PROGRAM: RESIDENCY<br />
DISTRICT/ SCHOOL: KATONAH/LEWISBORO/JOHN JAY HIGH SCHOOL<br />
# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />
# OF STUDENTS: 80 GRADE(S) 9-12<br />
DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 2/10-3/22/12<br />
NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />
STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 X STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />
1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />
1.<br />
2.<br />
3.<br />
4.<br />
5.<br />
6.<br />
STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />
ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />
EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />
ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />
TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />
QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />
STUDENTS WERE ENGAGED, SAW A VARIETY OF COLONIAL<br />
INSTRUMENTS, LEARNED AND PARTICIPATED IN SONGS AND HAD A<br />
WONDERFUL TIME.<br />
8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />
NONE<br />
9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />
FANTASTIC.<br />
1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />
2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />
3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />
4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />
5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />
6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />
7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />
NONE<br />
8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />
NONE<br />
9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />
NONE<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
ARTIST: JAMES PRELLER<br />
CONTRACT #: A7907<br />
TITLE OF PROGRAM: AUTHOR VISIT<br />
TYPE OF PROGRAM: ASSEMBLY<br />
DISTRICT/ SCHOOL: NEW ROCHELLE/DAVIS ELEM. SCHOOL<br />
# OF TEACHERS: 2<br />
# OF STUDENTS: 713 GRADE(S) 1-5<br />
DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 11/3-4/11<br />
NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />
STANDARD 1 STANDARD 2 STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />
ARTIST: JAMES PRELLER<br />
CONTRACT #: A7817<br />
TITLE OF PROGRAM: AUTHOR VISIT<br />
TYPE OF PROGRAM: ASSEMBLY<br />
DISTRICT/ SCHOOL: NEW ROCHELLE/DANIEL WEBSTER ELEM.<br />
# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />
# OF STUDENTS: 500 GRADE(S) K-5<br />
DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 11/2/11<br />
NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />
STANDARD 1 STANDARD 2 STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />
1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />
1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />
1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />
2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />
3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />
4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />
5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />
6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />
7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />
HE SPOKE ABOUT GETTING IDEAS FOR WRITING AND SHARED HIS<br />
PERSONAL EXPERIENCES.<br />
8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />
THE POWER POINT PRESENTATION WAS A GOOD VISUAL. IT WOULD<br />
BE NICE TO SEE PICTURES OF HIS WORK SPACE.<br />
9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />
OVERALL THE PRESENTATION WAS EFFECTIVE.<br />
5<br />
4<br />
4<br />
5<br />
5<br />
Y<br />
1.<br />
2.<br />
3.<br />
4.<br />
5.<br />
6.<br />
STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />
ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />
EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />
ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />
TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />
QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
N/<br />
7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />
HE ENGAGED STUDENTS DURING HIS PRESENTATION. CHILDREN<br />
WERE ENCOURAGE TO KEEP JOURNALS, READ AND WRITE AS<br />
AUTHORS.<br />
8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />
NONE<br />
9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />
MEETING AUTHORS ENABLES CHILDREN TO MAKE REAL LIFE<br />
CONNECTIONS. CHILDREN ARE INSPIRED TO WRITE.<br />
Arts in Education Service - School Evaluations <strong>2011</strong>-<strong>2012</strong><br />
Page 135 of 332
ARTIST: JAMES PRELLER<br />
CONTRACT #: A8521<br />
TITLE OF PROGRAM: AUTHOR VISIT<br />
TYPE OF PROGRAM: ASSEMBLY<br />
DISTRICT/ SCHOOL:<br />
# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />
YORKTOWN/MOHANSIC ELEM.<br />
# OF STUDENTS: 235 GRADE(S) 1 & 2<br />
DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 4/17/12<br />
NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />
STANDARD 1 STANDARD 2 STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />
ARTIST: JAMES PRELLER<br />
CONTRACT #: A8704<br />
TITLE OF PROGRAM: AUTHOR VISIT<br />
TYPE OF PROGRAM: ASSEMBLY<br />
DISTRICT/ SCHOOL:<br />
# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />
YORKTOWN/BROOKSIDE ELEM.<br />
# OF STUDENTS: 117 GRADE(S) 2<br />
DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 4/18/12<br />
NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />
STANDARD 1 STANDARD 2 STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />
1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />
1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />
1.<br />
2.<br />
3.<br />
4.<br />
5.<br />
6.<br />
STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />
ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />
EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />
ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />
TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />
QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />
5<br />
4<br />
5<br />
4<br />
4<br />
4<br />
7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />
STUDENTS WERE HIGHLY ENGAGED IN THE PRESENTATIONS AND<br />
CONTENT WAS APPROPRIATELY ADAPTED FOR GRADE LEVEL.<br />
8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />
NONE<br />
9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />
ARTIST:<br />
NONE<br />
JAMES WALTER KLUZ<br />
CONTRACT #: A7548<br />
TITLE OF PROGRAM: DRUMMING / LEARNING HOW TO BE A DRUMMER<br />
TYPE OF PROGRAM: WORKSHOP<br />
DISTRICT/ SCHOOL:<br />
KATONAH/LEWISBORO/KATONAH ELEM. SCHOOL<br />
# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />
# OF STUDENTS: 7 GRADE(S) 3-5<br />
DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE<br />
9/23-12/16/11<br />
NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />
STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 X STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />
1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />
2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />
3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />
4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />
5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />
6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />
7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />
HE LOVES INTERACTION WITH THE STUDENTS.<br />
5<br />
4<br />
4<br />
5<br />
5<br />
N/<br />
8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />
FOCUS MORE DIRECTLY ON HELPING STUDENTS WITH THE WRITING<br />
PROCESS. HE DID TALK ABOUT IT, BUT MORE ANECDOTALLY.<br />
9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />
HIS STYLE IS VERY LAID BACK. THAT IS A STRENGTH IN THAT HE IS<br />
TALKING TO THE STUDENTS NOT AT THEM. ONE TEACHER DIDN'T<br />
LIKE THAT HE MENTIONED HIS SON'S ILLNESS THE OTHER 4<br />
TEACHERS WERE FINE WITH IT. IT ILLUSTRATED HIS POINT THAT<br />
WE ARE UNIQUE AND OUR WRITING REFLECTS THAT.<br />
ARTIST:<br />
JANE WEINER<br />
TITLE OF PROGRAM: MODERN DANCE<br />
TYPE OF PROGRAM: RESIDENCY<br />
DISTRICT/ SCHOOL:<br />
CONTRACT #: A7863<br />
EASTCHESTER/EASTCHESTER HIGH SCHOOL<br />
# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />
# OF STUDENTS: GRADE(S) 9-12<br />
DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE<br />
12/7-9/11<br />
NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />
STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 X STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4 X<br />
1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />
1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />
1.<br />
2.<br />
3.<br />
4.<br />
5.<br />
6.<br />
STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />
ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />
EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />
ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />
TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />
QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />
4<br />
4<br />
4<br />
4<br />
4<br />
4<br />
7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />
VERY GOOD INSTRUCTOR. WELL LIKED AND EASY TO WORK WITH.<br />
8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />
NONE<br />
9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />
NONE<br />
1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />
2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />
3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />
4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />
5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />
6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />
7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />
NONE<br />
8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />
NONE<br />
9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />
NONE<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
N/<br />
Arts in Education Service - School Evaluations <strong>2011</strong>-<strong>2012</strong><br />
Page 136 of 332
ARTIST: JANET ELMAN dba JANET'S PLANET ART CONTRACT #: A7551B<br />
TITLE OF PROGRAM: ARTFUL OF FUN<br />
TYPE OF PROGRAM: WORKSHOP<br />
DISTRICT/ SCHOOL: KATONAH/LEWISBORO/KATONAH ELEM. SCHOOL<br />
# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />
# OF STUDENTS: 7 GRADE(S) K-2<br />
DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 9/28-11/30/11<br />
NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />
STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 X STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />
ARTIST: JANET ELMAN dba JANET'S PLANET ART CONTRACT #: A8691B<br />
TITLE OF PROGRAM: ARTFUL OF FUN<br />
TYPE OF PROGRAM: WORKSHOP<br />
DISTRICT/ SCHOOL: KATONAH/LEWISBORO/KATONAH ELEM. SCHOOL<br />
# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />
# OF STUDENTS: GRADE(S) K-2<br />
DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 4/11-5/30/12<br />
NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />
STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 X STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />
1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />
1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />
1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />
2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />
3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />
4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />
5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />
6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />
7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />
JANET IS ADORED BY THE STUDENTS. SHE HAS A REGULAR<br />
FOLLOWING AND HAS GREAT CLASSES.<br />
8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />
NONE<br />
9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />
NONE<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
1.<br />
2.<br />
3.<br />
4.<br />
5.<br />
6.<br />
STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />
ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />
EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />
ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />
TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />
QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />
JANET IS CARING ABOUT HER CLASSES AND THE STUDENTS. SHE<br />
IS A PLEASURE TO WORK WITH.<br />
8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />
NONE<br />
9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />
NONE<br />
ARTIST: JANET ELMAN dba JANET'S PLANET ART CONTRACT #: A8285B<br />
TITLE OF PROGRAM: BEADS, BASKETS & MACRAME<br />
TYPE OF PROGRAM: WORKSHOP<br />
DISTRICT/ SCHOOL: KATONAH/LEWISBORO/KATONAH ELEM. SCHOOL<br />
# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />
# OF STUDENTS: 9 GRADE(S) 3-5<br />
DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 1/20-3/16/12<br />
NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />
STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 X STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />
ARTIST: JANET ELMAN dba JANET'S PLANET ART CONTRACT #: A8285A<br />
TITLE OF PROGRAM: JUNK ART (MAKING ART OUT OF RECYCLED ITEMS)<br />
TYPE OF PROGRAM: WORKSHOP<br />
DISTRICT/ SCHOOL: KATONAH/LEWISBORO/KATONAH ELEM. SCHOOL<br />
# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />
# OF STUDENTS: 9 GRADE(S) K-2<br />
DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 1/18-3/14/12<br />
NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />
STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 X STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />
1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />
1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />
1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />
2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />
3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />
4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />
5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />
6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />
7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />
JANET IS AN INVENTIVE ARTIST WHO CARES MUCH ABOUT THE<br />
CHILDREN.<br />
8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />
NONE<br />
9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />
NONE<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
1.<br />
2.<br />
3.<br />
4.<br />
5.<br />
6.<br />
STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />
ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />
EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />
ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />
TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />
QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />
THOUGHTFUL AND IMAGINATIVE TEACHER WHO CARES ABOUT THE<br />
STUDENTS.<br />
8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />
NONE<br />
9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />
NONE<br />
Arts in Education Service - School Evaluations <strong>2011</strong>-<strong>2012</strong><br />
Page 137 of 332
ARTIST: JANET FRANCO<br />
CONTRACT #: A8571<br />
TITLE OF PROGRAM: DANCING THE CLASSICS<br />
TYPE OF PROGRAM: WORKSHOP<br />
DISTRICT/ SCHOOL:<br />
# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />
CHAPPAQUA/GRAFFLIN ELEM.<br />
# OF STUDENTS: GRADE(S) K<br />
DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 2/17-5/25/12<br />
NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />
STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4 X<br />
ARTIST: JANET L. REYNOLDS dba JAN REYNOLD<br />
CONTRACT #: A8488<br />
TITLE OF PROGRAM: AUTHOR VISIT - VANISHING CULTURES<br />
TYPE OF PROGRAM: ASSEMBLY<br />
DISTRICT/ SCHOOL:<br />
# OF TEACHERS: 4<br />
NORTH SALEM/PQ ELEM.<br />
# OF STUDENTS: 100 GRADE(S) 5<br />
DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 3/5/12<br />
NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />
STANDARD 1 STANDARD 2 STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4 X<br />
1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />
1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />
1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />
2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />
3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />
4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />
5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />
6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />
5<br />
5<br />
4<br />
5<br />
5<br />
N/<br />
1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />
2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />
3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />
4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />
5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />
6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />
JANET PRESENTS A LOVELY, EDUCATIONAL AND APPROPRIATE<br />
DANCE PROGRAM THAT WAS ALSO LOTS OF FUN.<br />
8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />
NONE<br />
9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />
NONE<br />
7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y<br />
JAN IS SUCH AN ENERGETIC INSPIRING ROLE MODEL.<br />
8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />
NONE<br />
9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />
STUDENTS ENJOYED PRESENTATION AND LEARNED A LOT.<br />
WHY?<br />
ARTIST: JANET L. REYNOLDS dba JAN REYNOLD<br />
CONTRACT #: A8396<br />
TITLE OF PROGRAM: VANISHING CULTURES<br />
TYPE OF PROGRAM: ASSEMBLY<br />
DISTRICT/ SCHOOL:<br />
# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />
ARDSLEY/CONCORD ROAD ELEM.<br />
# OF STUDENTS: 155 GRADE(S) 3<br />
DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 5/16/12<br />
NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />
STANDARD 1 STANDARD 2 STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4 X<br />
ARTIST: JANICE BUCKNER<br />
CONTRACT #: A8619<br />
TITLE OF PROGRAM: SONGS OF THE DIFFERENTLY ABLED<br />
TYPE OF PROGRAM: ASSEMBLY<br />
DISTRICT/ SCHOOL: LAKELAND/BENJAMIN FRANKLIN ELEM.<br />
# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />
# OF STUDENTS: 92 GRADE(S) K<br />
DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 3/13/12<br />
NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />
STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />
1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />
1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />
1.<br />
2.<br />
3.<br />
4.<br />
5.<br />
6.<br />
STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />
ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />
EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />
ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />
TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />
QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />
JAN'S VISIT IS A HIGHLIGHT OF OUR SCHOOL YEAR. SHE<br />
CONNECTS CULTURES FROM AROUND THE WORLD. THEY LEARN<br />
SO MUCH FROM HER.<br />
8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />
NONE<br />
9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />
HER PRESENTATION IS FANTASTIC. SHE IS AN INSPIRING AND<br />
WONDERFUL INDIVIDUAL.<br />
1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />
2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />
3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />
4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />
5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />
6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />
7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />
THIS PROGRAM WAS ENGAGING, FUN AND CONNECTED TO OUR<br />
CURRICULUM. WE WERE THRILLED WITH THE PRESENTATION.<br />
8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />
NONE<br />
9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />
NONE<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
Arts in Education Service - School Evaluations <strong>2011</strong>-<strong>2012</strong><br />
Page 138 of 332
ARTIST: JANICE NOTO HELMERS<br />
CONTRACT #: A8115D<br />
TITLE OF PROGRAM: FAIRY WORLD CRAFTS<br />
TYPE OF PROGRAM: WORKSHOP<br />
DISTRICT/ SCHOOL: CHAPPAQUA/WESTORCHARD ELEM.<br />
# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />
# OF STUDENTS: 8 GRADE(S) K-2<br />
DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 1/9-3/8/12<br />
NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />
STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 X STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />
ARTIST: JANINE SOLANO<br />
CONTRACT #: A8082<br />
TITLE OF PROGRAM: CHOREOGRAPHER OF THE SENIOR REVUE<br />
TYPE OF PROGRAM: RESIDENCY<br />
DISTRICT/ SCHOOL:<br />
# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />
ARDSLEY/ARDSLEY HIGH SCHOOL<br />
# OF STUDENTS: 70 GRADE(S) 12<br />
DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 12/1/11-1/21/12<br />
NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />
STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 X STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />
1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />
1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />
1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />
2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />
3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />
4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />
5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />
6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />
7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />
NONE<br />
8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />
NONE<br />
9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />
LOVELY INSTRUCTOR.<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
N/<br />
1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />
2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />
3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />
4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />
5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />
6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />
7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />
THE SHOW WAS A HIT AND HER DIRECTION WAS EXCELLENT.<br />
8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />
NONE<br />
9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />
HER SKILLS, INSIGHT AND ABILITY TO COMMUNICATE WITH THE<br />
STUDENTS IS A BLESSING. SHE IS IN TOUCH WITH THE CULTURAL<br />
EXPECTATIONS OF NOT ONLY OUR COMMUNITY, BUT MORE<br />
IMPORTANTLY THE STUDENTS.<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
N/<br />
ARTIST: JEAN L. HEINSOHN<br />
CONTRACT #: A8177<br />
TITLE OF PROGRAM: SET DESIGNER FOR THE SHOW - ANNIE GET YOUR<br />
GUN<br />
TYPE OF PROGRAM: RESIDENCY<br />
DISTRICT/ SCHOOL:<br />
# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />
TUCKAHOE/TUCKAHOE MS & HS<br />
# OF STUDENTS: GRADE(S) 6-12<br />
DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 1/10-3/19/12<br />
NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />
STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 X STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />
1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />
ARTIST: JEFFREY KANE<br />
CONTRACT #: A8577<br />
TITLE OF PROGRAM: DRUMMER FOR THE SHOW - SUGAR<br />
TYPE OF PROGRAM: ASSEMBLY<br />
DISTRICT/ SCHOOL: BRIARCLIFF/BRIARCLIFF HIGH SCHOOL<br />
# OF TEACHERS: 2<br />
# OF STUDENTS: GRADE(S) 9-12<br />
DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 4/4-11/12<br />
NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />
STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />
1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />
1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />
2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />
3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />
4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />
5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />
6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />
7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />
HEATHER WORKED WELL WITH OTHER STAFF AND WITH THE<br />
CHILDREN.<br />
8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />
NONE<br />
9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />
NONE<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />
2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />
3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />
4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />
5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />
6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />
7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />
NONE<br />
8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />
NONE<br />
9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />
NONE<br />
5<br />
4<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
Arts in Education Service - School Evaluations <strong>2011</strong>-<strong>2012</strong><br />
Page 139 of 332
ARTIST: JENNIFER BREEN<br />
CONTRACT #: A8369A<br />
TITLE OF PROGRAM: ART & CULTURE OF YOGA I<br />
TYPE OF PROGRAM: WORKSHOP<br />
DISTRICT/ SCHOOL:<br />
# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />
PELHAM/HUTCHINSON ELEM.<br />
# OF STUDENTS: 14 GRADE(S) K-2<br />
DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 2/3-3/30/12<br />
NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />
STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 X STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4 X<br />
ARTIST: JENNIFER BREEN<br />
CONTRACT #: A8369B<br />
TITLE OF PROGRAM: ART & CULTURE OF YOGA II<br />
TYPE OF PROGRAM: WORKSHOP<br />
DISTRICT/ SCHOOL:<br />
# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />
PELHAM/HUTCHINSON ELEM.<br />
# OF STUDENTS: 14 GRADE(S) 3-5<br />
DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 2/14-4/3/12<br />
NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />
STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 X STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4 X<br />
1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />
1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />
1.<br />
2.<br />
3.<br />
4.<br />
5.<br />
6.<br />
STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />
ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />
EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />
ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />
TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />
QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />
SHE IS A PLEASURE TO WORK WITH AND THE STUDENTS RESPOND<br />
VERY WELL TO HER.<br />
8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />
NONE<br />
9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />
NONE<br />
1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />
2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />
3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />
4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />
5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />
6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />
7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />
THE STUDENTS LOVE ARE AND MOVEMENT OF YOGA. GREAT<br />
CLASS TO HELP THEM GET EXTRA ENERGY AT MID DAY.<br />
8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />
NONE<br />
9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />
NONE<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
ARTIST: JENNINGS MICHAEL BURCH<br />
CONTRACT #: A7909<br />
TITLE OF PROGRAM: AUTHOR VISIT - THEY CAGETHE ANIMALS AT NIGHT<br />
TYPE OF PROGRAM: ASSEMBLY<br />
DISTRICT/ SCHOOL: CARMEL/GEORGE FISCHER MIDDLE SCHOOL<br />
# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />
# OF STUDENTS: 360 GRADE(S) 8<br />
DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 11/2/11<br />
NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />
STANDARD 1 STANDARD 2 STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />
ARTIST: JENNINGS MICHAEL BURCH<br />
CONTRACT #: A8872<br />
TITLE OF PROGRAM: AUTHOR VISIT - THEY CAGETHE ANIMALS AT NIGHT<br />
TYPE OF PROGRAM: ASSEMBLY<br />
DISTRICT/ SCHOOL: DOBBS FERRY/DOBBS FERRY MIDDLE SCHOOL<br />
# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />
# OF STUDENTS: GRADE(S) 7<br />
DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 6/4/12<br />
NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />
STANDARD 1 STANDARD 2 STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />
1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />
1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />
1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />
2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />
3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />
4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />
5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />
6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />
2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />
3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />
4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />
5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />
6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM?<br />
NONE<br />
8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />
NONE<br />
9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />
NONE<br />
Y<br />
WHY?<br />
7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />
AMAZING TO HEAR FIRST HAND THAT LIFE STORIES THAT MADE<br />
HIM CREATE THE BOOK.<br />
8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />
NONE<br />
9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />
NONE<br />
Arts in Education Service - School Evaluations <strong>2011</strong>-<strong>2012</strong><br />
Page 140 of 332
ARTIST: JENNINGS MICHAEL BURCH<br />
CONTRACT #: A8874<br />
TITLE OF PROGRAM: AUTHOR VISIT - THEY CAGETHE ANIMALS AT NIGHT<br />
TYPE OF PROGRAM: ASSEMBLY<br />
DISTRICT/ SCHOOL: OSSINING/ANNE DORNER MIDDLE SCHOOL<br />
# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />
# OF STUDENTS: 150 GRADE(S) 6<br />
DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 6/1/12<br />
NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />
STANDARD 1 STANDARD 2 STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />
ARTIST: JENQ-ING KUO<br />
CONTRACT #: A8198<br />
TITLE OF PROGRAM: CHINESE CULTURE - ORIGAMI<br />
TYPE OF PROGRAM: WORKSHOP<br />
DISTRICT/ SCHOOL: CHAPPAQUA/ROARING BROOK ELEM.<br />
# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />
# OF STUDENTS: 8 GRADE(S) 1-3<br />
DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 1/9-3/5/12<br />
NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />
STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 X STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4 X<br />
1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />
1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />
1.<br />
2.<br />
3.<br />
4.<br />
5.<br />
6.<br />
STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />
ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />
EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />
ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />
TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />
QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />
JENNINGS DESCRIBES WHAT LED TO HIS WRITING OF "THEY CAGE<br />
THE ANIMALS AT NIGHT" AND INSPIRES STUDENTS TO TELL THEIR<br />
STORIES.<br />
8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />
NONE<br />
9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />
NONE<br />
1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />
2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />
3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />
4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />
5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />
6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />
7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />
A STUDENTS LOVE JENQ EXPECIALLY HER CHINESE NEW YEAR<br />
DRAGON.<br />
8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />
NONE<br />
9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />
NONE<br />
5<br />
5<br />
4<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
ARTIST: JEREMY DeLUCA<br />
CONTRACT #: A7681<br />
TITLE OF PROGRAM: SET DESIGNER FOR THE FALL SHOW<br />
TYPE OF PROGRAM: RESIDENCY<br />
DISTRICT/ SCHOOL: KATONAH/LEWISBORO/JOHN JAY HIGH SCHOOL<br />
# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />
# OF STUDENTS: 400 GRADE(S) 9-12<br />
DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 10/17-11/24/11<br />
NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />
STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 X STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />
ARTIST: JEREMY DeLUCA<br />
CONTRACT #: A8310<br />
TITLE OF PROGRAM: SET DESIGNER FOR THE SHOW - GUYS & DOLLS<br />
TYPE OF PROGRAM: RESIDENCY<br />
DISTRICT/ SCHOOL: KATONAH/LEWISBORO/JOHN JAY HIGH SCHOOL<br />
# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />
# OF STUDENTS: 85 GRADE(S) 9-12<br />
DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 2/1-3/22/12<br />
NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />
STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 X STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />
1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />
1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />
1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />
2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />
3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />
4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />
5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />
6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />
2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />
3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />
4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />
5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />
6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM?<br />
NONE<br />
Y<br />
WHY?<br />
7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM?<br />
NONE<br />
Y<br />
WHY?<br />
8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />
NONE<br />
9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />
NONE<br />
8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />
NONE<br />
9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />
NONE<br />
Arts in Education Service - School Evaluations <strong>2011</strong>-<strong>2012</strong><br />
Page 141 of 332
ARTIST: JESSE WEISS<br />
CONTRACT #: A8567<br />
TITLE OF PROGRAM: SOUND DESIGNER FOR THE SHOW - THE DROWSY<br />
CHAPERONE<br />
TYPE OF PROGRAM: RESIDENCY<br />
DISTRICT/ SCHOOL: KATONAH/LEWISBORO/JOHN JAY MIDDLE SCHOOL<br />
# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />
# OF STUDENTS: 75 GRADE(S) 6-8<br />
DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 3/12-17/12<br />
NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />
STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 X STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />
ARTIST: JESSICA L. ATKINSON<br />
CONTRACT #: A8438<br />
TITLE OF PROGRAM: SET DESIGNER FOR THE SHOW - A FUNNY THING<br />
HAPPENED ON THE WAY TO THE FORUM<br />
TYPE OF PROGRAM: RESIDENCY<br />
DISTRICT/ SCHOOL: PUTNAM VALLEY/PUTNAM VALLEY HIGH SCHOOL<br />
# OF TEACHERS: 3<br />
# OF STUDENTS: 400 GRADE(S) 9-12<br />
DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 11/1-12/5/11<br />
NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />
STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 X STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />
1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />
1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />
1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />
2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />
3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />
4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />
5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />
6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />
2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />
3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />
4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />
5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />
6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM?<br />
GOOD JOB.<br />
Y<br />
WHY?<br />
7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM?<br />
NONE<br />
Y<br />
WHY?<br />
8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />
NONE<br />
9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />
NONE<br />
8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />
NONE<br />
9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />
NONE<br />
ARTIST: JESSICA MALONE ATKINSON<br />
CONTRACT #: A7781<br />
TITLE OF PROGRAM: SET DESIGNER FOR THE SHOW - DRACULA<br />
TYPE OF PROGRAM: RESIDENCY<br />
DISTRICT/ SCHOOL: PUTNAM VALLEY/PUTNAM VALLEY HIGH SCHOOL<br />
# OF TEACHERS: 2<br />
# OF STUDENTS: 50 GRADE(S) 9-12<br />
DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 11/1-12/5/11<br />
NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />
STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 X STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />
ARTIST: JOAN BAUER<br />
CONTRACT #: A7792<br />
TITLE OF PROGRAM: AUTHOR VISIT<br />
TYPE OF PROGRAM: ASSEMBLY<br />
DISTRICT/ SCHOOL: YORKTOWN/MILDRED STRANG MIDDLE SCHOOL<br />
# OF TEACHERS: 5<br />
# OF STUDENTS: 320 GRADE(S) 8<br />
DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 10/11/11<br />
NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />
STANDARD 1 STANDARD 2 STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />
1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />
1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />
1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />
2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />
3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />
4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />
5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />
6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />
7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />
NONE<br />
8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />
NONE<br />
9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />
NONE<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
1.<br />
2.<br />
3.<br />
4.<br />
5.<br />
6.<br />
STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />
ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />
EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />
ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />
TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />
QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
N/<br />
7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />
JOAN WAS HIGHLY ENERGETIC, ENTHUSIASTIC AND ENGAGING.<br />
SHE LED A HIGHLY INTERACTIVE PROGRAM THAT HELPED THE<br />
STUDENTS IDENTIFY WITH THE WRITING PROCESS. SHE WAS ABLE<br />
TO PERSONALIZE EACH PRESENTATION TO THE AUDIENCE<br />
INTERESTS AND RESPONSES.<br />
8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />
NONE<br />
9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />
WE WILL GLADLY WELCOME HER BACK NEXT YEAR.<br />
Arts in Education Service - School Evaluations <strong>2011</strong>-<strong>2012</strong><br />
Page 142 of 332
ARTIST: JOAN BRISSON<br />
CONTRACT #: A8360<br />
TITLE OF PROGRAM: HARRY POTTER - WIZARD CRAFTS<br />
TYPE OF PROGRAM: WORKSHOP<br />
DISTRICT/ SCHOOL:<br />
# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />
PELHAM/SIWANOY ELEM.<br />
# OF STUDENTS: 8 GRADE(S) 4 & 5<br />
DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 2/1-4/4/12<br />
NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />
STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 X STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />
ARTIST: JOAN BRISSON<br />
CONTRACT #: A7643<br />
TITLE OF PROGRAM: HARRY POTTER - WIZARD CRAFTS<br />
TYPE OF PROGRAM: WORKSHOP<br />
DISTRICT/ SCHOOL:<br />
# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />
PELHAM/SIWANOY ELEM.<br />
# OF STUDENTS: 13 GRADE(S) 3 & 4<br />
DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 10/5-11/30/11<br />
NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />
STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 X STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />
1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />
1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />
1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />
2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />
3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />
4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />
5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />
6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />
2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />
3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />
4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />
5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />
6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM?<br />
NONE<br />
Y<br />
WHY?<br />
7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM?<br />
NONE<br />
Y<br />
WHY?<br />
8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />
NONE<br />
9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />
NONE<br />
8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />
NONE<br />
9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />
NONE<br />
ARTIST: JOANN PEPPARD<br />
CONTRACT #: A8442<br />
TITLE OF PROGRAM: CO-PRODUCTION MANAGER FOR THE SHOW - A<br />
FUNNY THING HAPPENED ON THE WAY TO THE<br />
FORUM<br />
TYPE OF PROGRAM: RESIDENCY<br />
DISTRICT/ SCHOOL:<br />
PUTNAM VALLEY/PUTNAM VALLEY HIGH SCHOOL<br />
# OF TEACHERS: 3<br />
# OF STUDENTS: 400 GRADE(S) 9-12<br />
DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE<br />
3/3-4/23/12<br />
NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />
STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 X STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />
1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />
ARTIST: JOANN PEPPARD<br />
CONTRACT #: A7778<br />
TITLE OF PROGRAM: CO-PRODUCTION MANAGER FOR THE SHOW -<br />
DRACULA<br />
TYPE OF PROGRAM: RESIDENCY<br />
DISTRICT/ SCHOOL: PUTNAM VALLEY/PUTNAM VALLEY HIGH SCHOOL<br />
# OF TEACHERS: 2<br />
# OF STUDENTS: 50 GRADE(S) 9-12<br />
DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 11/1-12/5/11<br />
NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />
STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 X STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />
1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />
1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />
2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />
3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />
4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />
5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />
6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />
7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />
NONE<br />
8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />
NONE<br />
9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />
NONE<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />
2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />
3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />
4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />
5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />
6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />
7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />
NONE<br />
8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />
NONE<br />
9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />
NONE<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
Arts in Education Service - School Evaluations <strong>2011</strong>-<strong>2012</strong><br />
Page 143 of 332
ARTIST: JOCELYN KRAUS<br />
CONTRACT #: A8647<br />
TITLE OF PROGRAM: FLUTE PLAYER FOR THE SHOW - A FUNNY THING<br />
HAPPENED ON THE WAY TO THE FORUM<br />
TYPE OF PROGRAM: ASSEMBLY<br />
DISTRICT/ SCHOOL: PUTNAM VALLEY/PUTNAM VALLEY HIGH SCHOOL<br />
# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />
# OF STUDENTS: 400 GRADE(S) 9-12<br />
DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 4/13-23/12<br />
NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />
STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />
1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />
ARTIST: JOHANNA CARMINOCCI<br />
CONTRACT #: A8743A<br />
TITLE OF PROGRAM: CARTOONING<br />
TYPE OF PROGRAM: WORKSHOP<br />
DISTRICT/ SCHOOL:<br />
# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />
NORTH SALEM/PQ ELEM.<br />
# OF STUDENTS: 8 GRADE(S) 4 & 5<br />
DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 4/18-6/6/12<br />
NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />
STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 X STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />
1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />
1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />
2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />
3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />
4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />
5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />
6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />
7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />
NONE<br />
8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />
NONE<br />
9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />
NONE<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />
2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />
3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />
4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />
5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />
6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />
7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />
NONE<br />
8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />
NONE<br />
9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />
NONE<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
ARTIST: JOHANNA CARMINOCCI<br />
CONTRACT #: A8267<br />
TITLE OF PROGRAM: DESIGNING & CREATING A NEWSPAPER<br />
TYPE OF PROGRAM: WORKSHOP<br />
DISTRICT/ SCHOOL:<br />
# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />
NORTH SALEM/PQ ELEM.<br />
# OF STUDENTS: 23 GRADE(S) 4 & 5<br />
DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 1/256-3/29/12<br />
NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />
STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 X STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />
ARTIST: JOHANNA CARMINOCCI<br />
CONTRACT #: A7629<br />
TITLE OF PROGRAM: DESIGNING & CREATING A NEWSPAPER<br />
TYPE OF PROGRAM: WORKSHOP<br />
DISTRICT/ SCHOOL:<br />
# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />
NORTH SALEM/PQ ELEM.<br />
# OF STUDENTS: 19 GRADE(S) 4 & 5<br />
DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 10/6-12/15/11<br />
NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />
STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 X STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />
1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />
1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />
1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />
2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />
3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />
4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />
5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />
6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />
2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />
3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />
4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />
5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />
6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM?<br />
NONE<br />
Y<br />
WHY?<br />
7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM?<br />
NONE<br />
Y<br />
WHY?<br />
8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />
NONE<br />
9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />
NONE<br />
8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />
NONE<br />
9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />
NONE<br />
Arts in Education Service - School Evaluations <strong>2011</strong>-<strong>2012</strong><br />
Page 144 of 332
ARTIST: JOHANNA CARMINOCCI<br />
CONTRACT #: A8743B<br />
TITLE OF PROGRAM: DESIGNING & CREATING A NEWSPAPER<br />
TYPE OF PROGRAM: WORKSHOP<br />
DISTRICT/ SCHOOL:<br />
# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />
NORTH SALEM/PQ ELEM.<br />
# OF STUDENTS: 23 GRADE(S) 4 & 5<br />
DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 4/19-6/7/12<br />
NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />
STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 X STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />
ARTIST: JOHN (CHRIS) ROWLANDS<br />
CONTRACT #: A8072AB<br />
TITLE OF PROGRAM: OCEAN CONCERT & FARMING LIFE CONCERT<br />
TYPE OF PROGRAM: ASSEMBLY/WORKSHOP<br />
DISTRICT/ SCHOOL: KATONAH/LEWISBORO/KATONAH ELEM. SCHOOL<br />
# OF TEACHERS: 8<br />
# OF STUDENTS: 140 GRADE(S) 5 & K<br />
DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 5/21/12<br />
NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />
STANDARD 1 STANDARD 2 STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />
1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />
1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />
1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />
2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />
3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />
4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />
5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />
6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />
7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />
NONE<br />
8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />
NONE<br />
9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />
NONE<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
1.<br />
2.<br />
3.<br />
4.<br />
5.<br />
6.<br />
STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />
ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />
EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />
ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />
TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />
QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />
CHRIS IS OUTSTANDING. PROGRAM WAS INFORMATIVE, CREATIVE<br />
AND FUN.<br />
8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />
NONE<br />
9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />
NONE<br />
ARTIST: JOHN (CHRIS) ROWLANDS<br />
CONTRACT #: A8796<br />
TITLE OF PROGRAM: OCEAN SAFARI CONCERT<br />
TYPE OF PROGRAM: ASSEMBLY<br />
DISTRICT/ SCHOOL: PLEASANTVILLE/BEDFORD ROAD ELEM.<br />
# OF TEACHERS: 2<br />
# OF STUDENTS: 125 GRADE(S) 1<br />
DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 4/22/12<br />
NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />
STANDARD 1 STANDARD 2 STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />
ARTIST: JOHN (CHRIS) ROWLANDS<br />
CONTRACT #: A8594<br />
TITLE OF PROGRAM: SONGWRITING RESIDENCY<br />
TYPE OF PROGRAM: RESIDENCY<br />
DISTRICT/ SCHOOL:<br />
# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />
CARMEL/PATERSON ELEM.<br />
# OF STUDENTS: GRADE(S) 4<br />
DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 4/30-5/4/12<br />
NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />
STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 X STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />
1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />
1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />
1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />
2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />
3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />
4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />
5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />
6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />
2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />
3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />
4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />
5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />
6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
N/<br />
7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM?<br />
VERY ENTERTAINING AND EDUCATIONAL.<br />
8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />
NONE<br />
9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />
WE LOVED CHRIS.<br />
Y<br />
WHY?<br />
7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />
CHRIS IS AN AMAZING TEACHER. HE IS FUN BUT ALSO ABLE TO<br />
MAINTAIN STUDENT COOPERATION AND PRIDE.<br />
8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />
NONE<br />
9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />
YOU WILL LOVE WORKING WITH HIM.<br />
Arts in Education Service - School Evaluations <strong>2011</strong>-<strong>2012</strong><br />
Page 145 of 332
ARTIST: JOHN BOWEN<br />
CONTRACT #: A8579<br />
TITLE OF PROGRAM: PIANIST FOR THE SHOW - SUGAR<br />
TYPE OF PROGRAM: ASSEMBLY<br />
DISTRICT/ SCHOOL: BRIARCLIFF/BRIARCLIFF HIGH SCHOOL<br />
# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />
# OF STUDENTS: 70 GRADE(S) 9-12<br />
DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 3/4-11/12<br />
NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />
STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />
1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />
ARTIST: JOHN C. FREYER<br />
CONTRACT #: A8338<br />
TITLE OF PROGRAM: PRODUCTION DESIGNER FOR THE SHOW - GUYS &<br />
DOLLS<br />
TYPE OF PROGRAM: RESIDENCY<br />
DISTRICT/ SCHOOL: KATONAH/LEWISBORO/JOHN JAY HIGH SCHOOL<br />
# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />
# OF STUDENTS: 150 GRADE(S) 9-12<br />
DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 2/1-3/22/12<br />
NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />
STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 X STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />
1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />
1.<br />
2.<br />
3.<br />
4.<br />
5.<br />
6.<br />
STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />
ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />
EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />
ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />
TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />
QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
N/<br />
7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />
THE INTERACTION BETWEEN PROFESSIONAL AND STUDENT WAS<br />
INVALUABLE.<br />
8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />
MORE REHEARSAL TIME.<br />
9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />
NONE<br />
1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />
2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />
3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />
4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />
5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />
6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />
7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />
NONE<br />
8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />
NONE<br />
9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />
NONE<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
ARTIST: JOHN C. MAIER<br />
CONTRACT #: A8206<br />
TITLE OF PROGRAM: INTRO TO GUITAR<br />
TYPE OF PROGRAM: WORKSHOP<br />
DISTRICT/ SCHOOL: CHAPPAQUA/ROARING BROOK ELEM.<br />
# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />
# OF STUDENTS: 8 GRADE(S) 3 & 4<br />
DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 1/13-3/9/12<br />
NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />
STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 X STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />
ARTIST: JOHN DAVID JOHNSON<br />
CONTRACT #: A8786<br />
TITLE OF PROGRAM: POETRY - THE LANGUAGE OF MUSIC<br />
TYPE OF PROGRAM: WORKSHOP<br />
DISTRICT/ SCHOOL:<br />
# OF TEACHERS: 4<br />
TUCKAHOE/TUCKAHOE MS & HS<br />
# OF STUDENTS: GRADE(S) 6-12<br />
DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 5/9/12<br />
NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />
STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 X STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />
1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />
1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />
1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />
2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />
3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />
4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />
5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />
6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />
7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />
JOHN WAS VERY LATE FOR THE FIRST CLASS.<br />
8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />
NONE<br />
9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />
JOHN IS VERY IRRESPONSIBLE WITH PAPERWORK.<br />
4<br />
4<br />
4<br />
4<br />
2<br />
4<br />
1.<br />
2.<br />
3.<br />
4.<br />
5.<br />
6.<br />
STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />
ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />
EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />
ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />
TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />
QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />
THE ABILITY TO MODIFY THE PROGRAM QUICKLY FOR VAIOUS AGE<br />
GROUPS WAS IMPORTANT.<br />
8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />
NONE<br />
9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />
THE MATERIALS WERE RELEVANT TO OUR SOCIAL TIMES AND LIFE<br />
EXPERIENCE.<br />
Arts in Education Service - School Evaluations <strong>2011</strong>-<strong>2012</strong><br />
Page 146 of 332
ARTIST: JOHN FARRELL<br />
CONTRACT #: A8771<br />
TITLE OF PROGRAM: CHARACTER ED BULLYING CONCERTS<br />
TYPE OF PROGRAM: ASSEMBLY<br />
DISTRICT/ SCHOOL: KATONAH/LEWISBORO/ALL ELEM SCHOOLS<br />
# OF TEACHERS: 4<br />
# OF STUDENTS: 1800 GRADE(S) K-5<br />
DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 4/16-23/12<br />
NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />
STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />
ARTIST: JOHN FARRELL<br />
CONTRACT #: A8597<br />
TITLE OF PROGRAM: LET'S TREAT EACH OTHER BETTER<br />
TYPE OF PROGRAM: ASSEMBLY<br />
DISTRICT/ SCHOOL: TARRYTOWN/JOHN PAULDING ELEM.<br />
# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />
# OF STUDENTS: 332 GRADE(S) PRE K &<br />
DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 3/2/12<br />
NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />
STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />
1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />
1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />
1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />
2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />
3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />
4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />
5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />
6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />
2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />
3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />
4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />
5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />
6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
N/<br />
7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />
IT IS TRULY A CHARACTER ED SHOW THAT BUILDS RESILIENCE<br />
AND A SENSE OF COMMUNITY WITH CREATIVE SONGS, MUSIC,<br />
STORIES AND DANCE.<br />
8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />
NONE<br />
9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />
WE WILL INVITE THEM BACK.<br />
7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM?<br />
NONE<br />
8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />
JOHN JUST KEEPS GETTING BETTER.<br />
9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />
WAITING FOR A NEW CD.<br />
Y<br />
WHY?<br />
ARTIST: JOHN FARRELL<br />
CONTRACT #: A8465<br />
TITLE OF PROGRAM: SONGS ABOUT EMPATHY<br />
TYPE OF PROGRAM: ASSEMBLY<br />
DISTRICT/ SCHOOL:<br />
# OF TEACHERS: 3<br />
NORTH SALEM/PQ ELEM.<br />
# OF STUDENTS: GRADE(S) K-5<br />
DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 2/27/12<br />
NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />
STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />
ARTIST: JOHN GRADY dba J. D. CONSULTING CONTRACT #: A8877<br />
TITLE OF PROGRAM: DRUM CIRCLE - MUSIC & DANCE<br />
TYPE OF PROGRAM: WORKSHOP<br />
DISTRICT/ SCHOOL:<br />
# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />
PELHAM/COLONIAL ELEM.<br />
# OF STUDENTS: 110 GRADE(S) K & 1<br />
DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 6/6-8/12<br />
NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />
STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 X STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4 X<br />
1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />
1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />
1.<br />
2.<br />
3.<br />
4.<br />
5.<br />
6.<br />
STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />
ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />
EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />
ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />
TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />
QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
N/<br />
7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />
JOHN IS ENTERTAINING, EDUCATIONAL AND PROFESSIONAL. THE<br />
CHILDREN WERE VISIBLY MOVED AND TOUCHED BY JOHN'S SONGS<br />
AND STORIES.<br />
8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />
NONE<br />
9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />
GREAT ASSEMBLY FOR ANTI-BULLYING AND CHARACTER<br />
BUILDING.<br />
1.<br />
2.<br />
3.<br />
4.<br />
5.<br />
6.<br />
STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />
ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />
EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />
ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />
TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />
QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />
THE WORKSHOP WAS ENGAGING AND EXCITING FOR ALL. IT WAS<br />
ALSO GREAT EXPOSURE TO AFRICAN HISTORY.<br />
8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />
NONE<br />
9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />
THE CHILDREN WERE ENGAGED THROUGHOUT AND LOVED THE<br />
PROGRAM.<br />
Arts in Education Service - School Evaluations <strong>2011</strong>-<strong>2012</strong><br />
Page 147 of 332
ARTIST: JOHN W. BOWEN<br />
CONTRACT #: A8112<br />
TITLE OF PROGRAM: MUSICAL DIRECTOR FOR THE SHOW - SEUSSICAL<br />
TYPE OF PROGRAM: RESIDENCY<br />
DISTRICT/ SCHOOL: CHAPPAQUA/SEVEN BRIDGES MIDDLE SCHOOL<br />
# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />
# OF STUDENTS: 103 GRADE(S) 5-8<br />
DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 12/15/11-2/13/12<br />
NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />
STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 X STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />
ARTIST: JONATHAN DELMAN dba JONATHAN BL CONTRACT #: A7509<br />
TITLE OF PROGRAM: PERFORMING MAGIC<br />
TYPE OF PROGRAM: WORKSHOP<br />
DISTRICT/ SCHOOL: KATONAH/LEWISBORO/INCREASE MILLER ELEM.<br />
# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />
# OF STUDENTS: 7 GRADE(S) 1-3<br />
DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 10/6-12/1/11<br />
NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />
STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 X STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />
1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />
1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />
1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />
2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />
3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />
4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />
5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />
6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />
2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />
3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />
4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />
5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />
6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />
JOHN WORKED MUSICAL MAGIC WITH A WIDE AND DIVERSELY<br />
TALENTED GROUP OF STUDENTS.<br />
8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />
NONE<br />
9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />
NONE<br />
7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />
JONATHAN'S CLASSES ALWAYS DELIGHT THE STUDENTS.<br />
PARENTS TELL ME THAT THEIR CHILDREN CONTINUE THE<br />
PERFORMANCE AT HOME.<br />
8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />
NONE<br />
9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />
NONE<br />
ARTIST: JONATHAN DELMAN dba JONATHAN BL CONTRACT #: A8230<br />
TITLE OF PROGRAM: PERFORMING MAGIC<br />
TYPE OF PROGRAM: WORKSHOP<br />
DISTRICT/ SCHOOL: KATONAH/LEWISBORO/INCREASE MILLER ELEM.<br />
# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />
# OF STUDENTS: 9 GRADE(S) 1-3<br />
DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 1/23-3/19/12<br />
NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />
STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 X STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />
ARTIST: JONATHAN FLAKS COACHING ASSOC., I<br />
CONTRACT #: A8598<br />
TITLE OF PROGRAM: ELLEN FLAKS - CREATIVE DRAMA<br />
TYPE OF PROGRAM: RESIDENCY<br />
DISTRICT/ SCHOOL: EASTCHESTER/ANNE HUTCHINSON ELEM.<br />
# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />
# OF STUDENTS: GRADE(S) 2 & 3<br />
DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 3/5-5/14/12<br />
NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />
STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />
1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />
1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />
1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />
2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />
3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />
4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />
5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />
6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />
2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />
3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />
4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />
5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />
6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />
4<br />
4<br />
4<br />
4<br />
4<br />
4<br />
7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />
HE BROUGHT HIS BIRDS INTO CLASS AND MADE BALLOON<br />
ANIMALS. WHAT FUN.<br />
8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />
NONE<br />
9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />
NONE<br />
7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM?<br />
VERY INVOLVED WITH CHILDREN.<br />
8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />
NONE<br />
9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />
NONE<br />
Y<br />
WHY?<br />
Arts in Education Service - School Evaluations <strong>2011</strong>-<strong>2012</strong><br />
Page 148 of 332
ARTIST: JONATHAN FLAKS COACHING ASSOC., I CONTRACT #: A7615A<br />
TITLE OF PROGRAM: ELLEN FLAKS - CREATIVE DRAMA<br />
TYPE OF PROGRAM: WORKSHOP<br />
DISTRICT/ SCHOOL:<br />
# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />
PELHAM/HUTCHINSON ELEM.<br />
# OF STUDENTS: 12 GRADE(S) K-2<br />
DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 10/11-11/22/11<br />
NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />
STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />
ARTIST: JONATHAN FLAKS COACHING ASSOC., I<br />
CONTRACT #: A7615B<br />
TITLE OF PROGRAM: ELLEN FLAKS - IMPROV THEATRE<br />
TYPE OF PROGRAM: WORKSHOP<br />
DISTRICT/ SCHOOL:<br />
# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />
PELHAM/HUTCHINSON ELEM.<br />
# OF STUDENTS: 9 GRADE(S) 3-5<br />
DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 10/13-12/8/11<br />
NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />
STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />
1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />
1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />
1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />
2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />
3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />
4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />
5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />
6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />
2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />
3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />
4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />
5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />
6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />
ANOTHER GREAT YEAR WITH ELLEN. THE STUDENTS LOOK<br />
FORWARD TO PARTICIPATING IN HER CLASS.<br />
8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />
NONE<br />
9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />
NONE<br />
7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />
ELLEN'S ENTHUSIASM IS CONTAGIST. THE STUDENTS LOOK<br />
FORWARD TO HER CLASS WEEK AFTER WEEK.<br />
8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />
NONE<br />
9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />
NONE<br />
ARTIST: JONATHAN FLAKS COACHING ASSOC., I<br />
CONTRACT #: A8374<br />
TITLE OF PROGRAM: ELLEN FLAKS - IMPROVE THEATRE<br />
TYPE OF PROGRAM: RESIDENCY<br />
DISTRICT/ SCHOOL:<br />
# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />
PELHAM/HUTCHINSON ELEM.<br />
# OF STUDENTS: 10 GRADE(S) 3-5<br />
DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 2/9-4/5/12<br />
NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />
STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />
ARTIST: JONATHAN KRUK<br />
CONTRACT #: A7830A<br />
TITLE OF PROGRAM: FAIRYTALE THEATRE<br />
TYPE OF PROGRAM: ASSEMBLY<br />
DISTRICT/ SCHOOL:<br />
# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />
PELHAM/COLONIAL ELEM.<br />
# OF STUDENTS: GRADE(S) 1<br />
DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 11/7/11<br />
NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />
STANDARD 1 STANDARD 2 STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />
1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />
1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />
1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />
2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />
3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />
4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />
5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />
6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />
2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />
3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />
4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />
5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />
6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />
ELLEN LOVES WORKING WITH THE CHILDREN. THERE IS AN<br />
ENERGY TO HER CLASS THAT IS UNBELIEVEABLE.<br />
8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />
NONE<br />
9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />
NONE<br />
7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM?<br />
NONE<br />
8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />
NONE<br />
9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />
NONE<br />
Y<br />
WHY?<br />
Arts in Education Service - School Evaluations <strong>2011</strong>-<strong>2012</strong><br />
Page 149 of 332
ARTIST: JONATHAN KRUK<br />
CONTRACT #: A8079B<br />
TITLE OF PROGRAM: FAIRYTALE THEATRE<br />
TYPE OF PROGRAM: ASSEMBLY<br />
DISTRICT/ SCHOOL:<br />
# OF TEACHERS: 4<br />
LAKELAND/LINCOLN-TITUS ELEM.<br />
# OF STUDENTS: 90 GRADE(S) 2<br />
DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 3/16/12<br />
NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />
STANDARD 1 STANDARD 2 STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4 X<br />
ARTIST: JONATHAN KRUK<br />
CONTRACT #: A8079A<br />
TITLE OF PROGRAM: FINGER FABLES<br />
TYPE OF PROGRAM: ASSEMBLY<br />
DISTRICT/ SCHOOL:<br />
# OF TEACHERS: 9<br />
LAKELAND/LINCOLN-TITUS ELEM.<br />
# OF STUDENTS: 84 GRADE(S) K & 1<br />
DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 3/16/12<br />
NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />
STANDARD 1 STANDARD 2 STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4 X<br />
1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />
1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />
1.<br />
2.<br />
3.<br />
4.<br />
5.<br />
6.<br />
STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />
ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />
EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />
ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />
TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />
QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />
HIS IS VERY ENGAGING AND DOES AN EXCELLENT JOB EXPOSING<br />
THE CHILDREN TO VARIOUS FORMS OF ART.<br />
8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />
NONE<br />
9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />
IT IS ALWAYS A PLEASURE TO SEE THE CHILDREN SO EXCITED<br />
ABOUT A PRESENTATION.<br />
1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />
2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />
3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />
4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />
5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />
6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />
7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />
CHILDREN WERE TOTALLY ENGAGED. HIS PERFORMANCE WAS<br />
AGE APPROPRIATE AND INTERACTIVE.<br />
8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />
NONE<br />
9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />
WE ARE LOOKING FORWARD TO HIS RETURN NEXT YEAR.<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
ARTIST: JONATHAN KRUK<br />
CONTRACT #: A8547<br />
TITLE OF PROGRAM: FINGER FABLES<br />
TYPE OF PROGRAM: ASSEMBLY/WORKSHOP<br />
DISTRICT/ SCHOOL:<br />
# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />
PELHAM/PROSPECT HILL ELEM.<br />
# OF STUDENTS: 47 GRADE(S) K & 1<br />
DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 5/2-4/12<br />
NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />
STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 X STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4 X<br />
ARTIST: JONATHAN KRUK<br />
CONTRACT #: A7790<br />
TITLE OF PROGRAM: FINGER FABLES<br />
TYPE OF PROGRAM: ASSEMBLY<br />
DISTRICT/ SCHOOL: PUTNAM VALLEY/PUTNAM VALLEY ELEM.<br />
# OF TEACHERS: 3<br />
# OF STUDENTS: 100 GRADE(S) K<br />
DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 10/4/11<br />
NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />
STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />
1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />
1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />
1.<br />
2.<br />
3.<br />
4.<br />
5.<br />
6.<br />
STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />
ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />
EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />
ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />
TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />
QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
4<br />
4<br />
7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />
HE IS A VERY ENGAGING STORYTELLER. THE STUDENTS WERE SO<br />
INSPIRED AND LOVED HEARING DIFFERENT FABLES AND<br />
FOLKTALES.<br />
8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />
NONE<br />
9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />
NONE<br />
1.<br />
2.<br />
3.<br />
4.<br />
5.<br />
6.<br />
STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />
ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />
EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />
ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />
TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />
QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />
GREAT PROGRAM. HE HAS A WONDERFUL WAY OF GETTING THE<br />
CHILDRENS ATTENTION AND KEEPING IT.<br />
8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />
MAYBE SOME VISUALS FOR THE ELL STUDENTS.<br />
9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />
FABULOUS, THANKS.<br />
Arts in Education Service - School Evaluations <strong>2011</strong>-<strong>2012</strong><br />
Page 150 of 332
ARTIST: JONATHAN KRUK<br />
CONTRACT #: A8348<br />
TITLE OF PROGRAM: FINGER FABLES<br />
TYPE OF PROGRAM: ASSEMBLY<br />
DISTRICT/ SCHOOL: KATONAH/LEWISBORO/LEWISBORO ELEM.<br />
# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />
# OF STUDENTS: 39 GRADE(S) K<br />
DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 1/27/12<br />
NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />
STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4 X<br />
ARTIST: JONATHAN KRUK<br />
CONTRACT #: A8397<br />
TITLE OF PROGRAM: FOLKTALES AROUND THE WORLD<br />
TYPE OF PROGRAM: WORKSHOP<br />
DISTRICT/ SCHOOL:<br />
# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />
SOMERS/PRIMROSE ELEM.<br />
# OF STUDENTS: 268 GRADE(S) 3<br />
DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 6/1/12<br />
NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />
STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4 X<br />
1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />
1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />
1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />
2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />
3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />
4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />
5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />
6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />
7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />
NONE<br />
8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />
NONE<br />
9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />
NONE<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
N/<br />
1.<br />
2.<br />
3.<br />
4.<br />
5.<br />
6.<br />
STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />
ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />
EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />
ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />
TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />
QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />
HIS PROGRAM IS RECEIVED WELL BY BOTH CHILDREN AND<br />
ADULTS. HE GETS STUDENTS INVOLVED AS CHARACTERS IN THE<br />
STORIES AND IT BECOMES A MEMORABLE EXPERIENCE.<br />
8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />
NONE<br />
9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />
WE WILL CONTINUE TO BOOK JONATHAN IN THE FUTURE.<br />
ARTIST: JONATHAN KRUK<br />
CONTRACT #: A7884<br />
TITLE OF PROGRAM: HALLOWEEN TALES AND HUDSON RIVER LORE<br />
TYPE OF PROGRAM: ASSEMBLY<br />
DISTRICT/ SCHOOL: HENDRICK HUDSON/FRANK G. LINDSEY ELEM.<br />
# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />
# OF STUDENTS: 472 GRADE(S) K-5<br />
DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 10/31/12<br />
NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />
STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4 X<br />
ARTIST: JONATHAN KRUK<br />
CONTRACT #: A8869<br />
TITLE OF PROGRAM: HUDSON VALLEY RIVER LORE<br />
TYPE OF PROGRAM: ASSEMBLY<br />
DISTRICT/ SCHOOL:<br />
# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />
TUCKAHOE/W. E. COTTLE ELEM.<br />
# OF STUDENTS: 100 GRADE(S) 4<br />
DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 6/18/12<br />
NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />
STANDARD 1 STANDARD 2 STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4 X<br />
1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />
1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />
1.<br />
2.<br />
3.<br />
4.<br />
5.<br />
6.<br />
STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />
ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />
EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />
ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />
TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />
QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />
WE HAVE HAD HIM HERE SEVERAL TIMES AND THE CHILDREN LOVE<br />
HIS PROGRAMS.<br />
8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />
NONE<br />
9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />
NONE<br />
1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />
2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />
3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />
4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />
5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />
6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />
7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />
NONE<br />
8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />
NONE<br />
9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />
NONE<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
Arts in Education Service - School Evaluations <strong>2011</strong>-<strong>2012</strong><br />
Page 151 of 332
ARTIST: JONATHAN KRUK<br />
CONTRACT #: A7830B<br />
TITLE OF PROGRAM: HUDSON VALLEY RIVER LORE<br />
TYPE OF PROGRAM: WORKSHOP<br />
DISTRICT/ SCHOOL:<br />
# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />
PELHAM/COLONIAL ELEM.<br />
# OF STUDENTS: GRADE(S) 4<br />
DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 5/2/12<br />
NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />
STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4 X<br />
ARTIST: JONATHAN KRUK<br />
CONTRACT #: A8879<br />
TITLE OF PROGRAM: HUDSON VALLEY RIVER LORE<br />
TYPE OF PROGRAM: ASSEMBLY<br />
DISTRICT/ SCHOOL: EASTCHESTER/ANNE HUTCHINSON ELEM.<br />
# OF TEACHERS: 5<br />
# OF STUDENTS: 21 GRADE(S) 4<br />
DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 6/13/12<br />
NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />
STANDARD 1 STANDARD 2 STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4 X<br />
1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />
1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />
1.<br />
2.<br />
3.<br />
4.<br />
5.<br />
6.<br />
STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />
ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />
EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />
ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />
TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />
QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />
4<br />
4<br />
5<br />
5<br />
4<br />
4<br />
7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />
HE IS WONDERFUL. HE TOLD GREAT STORIES THAT FIT PERFECTLY<br />
IN OUR SOCIAL STUDIES LEARNING AND LOCAL HISTORY.<br />
8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />
MAYBE A FORMAL FOLLOW UP ACTIVITY.<br />
9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />
IT WAS GREAT. THANK YOU.<br />
1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />
2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />
3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />
4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />
5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />
6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />
7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />
THIS PROGRAM WAS A WONDERFUL CULMINATION TO OUR<br />
HISTORICAL STUDIES OF NYS. STUDENTS HAD A FIELD TRIP TO<br />
WEST POINT AND COULD THUS VISUALIZE MANY OF THE<br />
LOCATIONS ON THE HUDSON RIVER.<br />
8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />
NONE<br />
9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />
NONE<br />
5<br />
5<br />
4<br />
4<br />
5<br />
N/<br />
ARTIST: JONATHAN KRUK<br />
CONTRACT #: A8721<br />
TITLE OF PROGRAM: HUDSON VALLEY RIVER LORE<br />
TYPE OF PROGRAM: ASSEMBLY/WORKSHOP<br />
DISTRICT/ SCHOOL:<br />
# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />
GARRISON/GARRISON SCHOOL<br />
# OF STUDENTS: 40 GRADE(S) 4<br />
DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 5/9/12<br />
NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />
STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 X STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4 X<br />
ARTIST: JONATHAN KRUK<br />
CONTRACT #: A7878<br />
TITLE OF PROGRAM: MEDIEVAL MANORS & MANNERS<br />
TYPE OF PROGRAM: ASSEMBLY<br />
DISTRICT/ SCHOOL: PUTNAM VALLEY/PUTNAM VALLEY MIDDLE SCHOOL<br />
# OF TEACHERS: 3<br />
# OF STUDENTS: 150 GRADE(S) 6<br />
DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 5/17/12<br />
NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />
STANDARD 1 STANDARD 2 STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4 X<br />
1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />
1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />
1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />
2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />
3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />
4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />
5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />
6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />
7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />
JONATHAN WEAVES LOCAL HISTORY INTO A FUN EDUCATIONAL<br />
SKIT. THE CHILDREN ENJOY LISTENING TO HIS STORIES AND<br />
PERFORMING HIS SKITS.<br />
8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />
NONE<br />
9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />
NONE<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />
2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />
3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />
4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />
5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />
6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />
7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />
NONE<br />
8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />
NONE<br />
9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />
NONE<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
Arts in Education Service - School Evaluations <strong>2011</strong>-<strong>2012</strong><br />
Page 152 of 332
ARTIST: JONATHAN KRUK<br />
CONTRACT #: A7743<br />
TITLE OF PROGRAM: MEDIEVAL MANORS & MANNERS<br />
TYPE OF PROGRAM: ASSEMBLY/WORKSHOP<br />
DISTRICT/ SCHOOL: LAKELAND/COPPER BEECH MIDDLE SCHOOL<br />
# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />
# OF STUDENTS: GRADE(S) 6<br />
DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 5/21-24/12<br />
NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />
STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 X STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4 X<br />
ARTIST: JONATHAN KRUK<br />
CONTRACT #: A8832<br />
TITLE OF PROGRAM: MEDIEVAL MANORS & MANNERS<br />
TYPE OF PROGRAM: ASSEMBLY<br />
DISTRICT/ SCHOOL: HALDANE/HALDANE ELEM. SCHOOL<br />
# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />
# OF STUDENTS: 64 GRADE(S) 6<br />
DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 5/20/12<br />
NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />
STANDARD 1 STANDARD 2 STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4 X<br />
1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />
1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />
1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />
2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />
3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />
4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />
5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />
6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />
7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />
THIS IS A WONDERFUL SUPPLEMENT TO ANY STUDY OF THE<br />
MIDDLE AGES. THE STORIES, SKITS, PROPS, COSTUMES AND<br />
JONATHAN BRING THIS PERIOD OF TIME TO LIFE.<br />
8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />
NONE<br />
9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />
JONATHAN IS ALWAYS ONE OF THE HIGHLIGHTS OF THE ACADEMIC<br />
Y EAR. TO NOT HAVE HIM APPEAR, WOULD BE TO MISS OUT ON<br />
SOMETHING SPECIAL.<br />
ARTIST: JONATHAN KRUK<br />
TITLE OF PROGRAM: STORYTELLING<br />
TYPE OF PROGRAM: ASSEMBLY<br />
DISTRICT/ SCHOOL:<br />
BREWSTER/GARDEN STREET ELEM.<br />
CONTRACT #: A8666<br />
# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />
# OF STUDENTS: GRADE(S) K-3<br />
DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE<br />
4/29/12<br />
NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />
STANDARD 1 STANDARD 2 STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />
1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
1.<br />
2.<br />
3.<br />
4.<br />
5.<br />
6.<br />
STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />
ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />
EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />
ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />
TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />
QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />
4<br />
5<br />
4<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />
JONATHAN DID AN OUTSTANDING JOB IN PRESENTING THE<br />
CONTENT IN AN ENGAGING MANNER AND INVOLVED THE AUDIENCE<br />
IN AS MANY WAYS AS POSSIBLE.<br />
8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />
NONE<br />
9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />
HE HELD THIS PRESENTATION IN RATHER EXTREME WEATHER<br />
CONDITIONS WHERE MANY STUDENTS WERE DISTRACTED BY THE<br />
INTENSE HEAT. HE STILL MANAGED TO KEEP THE STUDENTS<br />
ENGAGED.<br />
ARTIST: JONATHAN LOHMAN<br />
CONTRACT #: A8560<br />
TITLE OF PROGRAM: MUSICIANS FROM THE CROOKED ROAD - MASTER<br />
CLASS<br />
TYPE OF PROGRAM: ASSEMBLY/WORKSHOP<br />
DISTRICT/ SCHOOL: IRVINGTON/DOWS LANE ELEM & MS, HS<br />
# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />
# OF STUDENTS: 500 GRADE(S) 1-12<br />
DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 3/15-16/12<br />
NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />
STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 X STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4 X<br />
1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />
1.<br />
2.<br />
3.<br />
4.<br />
5.<br />
6.<br />
STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />
ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />
EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />
ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />
TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />
QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
N/<br />
7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />
JONATHAN WAS FANTASTIC. IT IS ALWAYS A PLEASURE TO HEAR<br />
HIM TELL HIS STORIES. WE WERE SO GALD HE WAS ABLE TO<br />
RETURN.<br />
8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />
NONE<br />
9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />
NONE<br />
1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />
2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />
3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />
4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />
5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />
6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />
7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />
THESE MUSICIANS RELATE TO STUDENTS OF ALL AGES<br />
NATURALLY. THEY ARE TRUE MASTERS AND LOVE SHARING IT<br />
WITH OTHERS.<br />
8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />
NONE<br />
9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />
THE MUSICIANS TOOK A NEW SONG AND TAUGHT IT TO THE HS<br />
AND MS ORCHESTRAS WITHIN 15 MINUTES. THE STUDENTS<br />
REALLY ENJOYED THE EXPERIENCE.<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
Arts in Education Service - School Evaluations <strong>2011</strong>-<strong>2012</strong><br />
Page 153 of 332
ARTIST: JONATHAN SPROUT<br />
CONTRACT #: A8661<br />
TITLE OF PROGRAM: AMERICAN HEROES I - MUSICAL SHOW<br />
TYPE OF PROGRAM: ASSEMBLY<br />
DISTRICT/ SCHOOL: KATONAH/LEWISBORO/INCREASE MILLER ELEM.<br />
# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />
# OF STUDENTS: GRADE(S) 2<br />
DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 3/6/12<br />
NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />
STANDARD 1 STANDARD 2 STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4 X<br />
ARTIST: JONATHAN SPROUT<br />
CONTRACT #: A8417<br />
TITLE OF PROGRAM: AMERICAN HEROES I - MUSICAL SHOW<br />
TYPE OF PROGRAM: ASSEMBLY<br />
DISTRICT/ SCHOOL: EASTCHESTER/WAVERLY EARLY CHILDHOOD CTR<br />
# OF TEACHERS: 6<br />
# OF STUDENTS: 225 GRADE(S) 1<br />
DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 2/16/12<br />
NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />
STANDARD 1 STANDARD 2 STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4 X<br />
1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />
1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />
1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />
2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />
3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />
4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />
5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />
6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />
7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />
ABSOLUTELY. HE IS ENGAGING AND ACADEMICALLY<br />
APPROPRIATE FOR CHILDREN OF ALL AGES.<br />
8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />
NONE<br />
9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />
HIS MESSAGE ABOUT HEROES IS IMPORTANT. A HERO IS NOT<br />
NECESSARILY SOMEONE WHO IS FAMOUS BUT RATHER SOMEONE<br />
WHO MAKES A DIFFERENCE IN OTHER PEOPLES LIVES.<br />
ARTIST: JONATHAN SPROUT<br />
CONTRACT #: A7809<br />
TITLE OF PROGRAM: AMERICAN HEROES I - MUSICAL SHOW<br />
TYPE OF PROGRAM: ASSEMBLY<br />
DISTRICT/ SCHOOL:<br />
CHAPPAQUA/WESTORCHARD ELEM.<br />
# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />
# OF STUDENTS: GRADE(S) 2<br />
DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE<br />
2/16/12<br />
NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />
STANDARD 1 STANDARD 2 STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4 X<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />
2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />
3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />
4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />
5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />
6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />
7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />
GREAT PROGRAM. VERY AGE APPROPRIATE AND INFORMATIVE.<br />
THE CHILDREN CONTINUED TO TALK ABOUT THE HEROES WHEN<br />
THEY RETURNED TO THE CLASSROOM. THE DANCING AND<br />
AUDIENCE PARTICIPATION WERE GREAT. THE ARTIST HAD A NICE<br />
RAPPORT WITH THE STUDENTS.<br />
8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />
PERHAPS YOU COULD SHORTEN THE PROGRAM. THIS MIGHT HELP<br />
TO BETTER HOLD THE STUDENTS.<br />
9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />
A WONDERFULLY CRAFTED PROGRAM. WE LOOK FORWARD TO<br />
THIS PROGRAM AGAIN NEXT YEAR.<br />
ARTIST: JONATHAN SPROUT<br />
CONTRACT #: A8001<br />
TITLE OF PROGRAM: AMERICAN HEROES I - MUSICAL SHOW<br />
TYPE OF PROGRAM: ASSEMBLY<br />
DISTRICT/ SCHOOL:<br />
KATONAH/LEWISBORO/MEADOWPOND ELEM.<br />
# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />
# OF STUDENTS: 68 GRADE(S) 2<br />
DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 3/6/12<br />
NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />
STANDARD 1 STANDARD 2 STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4 X<br />
4<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />
1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />
1.<br />
2.<br />
3.<br />
4.<br />
5.<br />
6.<br />
STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />
ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />
EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />
ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />
TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />
QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />
VERY APPROPRIATE AND STUDENT FRIENDLY. VERY RELEVANT TO<br />
SOCIAL STUDIES UNIT ON HEROES.<br />
8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />
NONE<br />
9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />
WE TRULY ENJOYED THE SHOW. WE ARE LOOKING FORWARD TO<br />
HAVING HIM BACK.<br />
1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />
2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />
3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />
4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />
5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />
6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />
7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />
STUDENTS LOVED IT. EVERYONE IS INVOLVED AND LEARNS<br />
ABOUT HISTORY, PEOPLE AND EVENTS.<br />
8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />
NONE<br />
9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />
MIGHT TRY DIFFERENT LONGS NEXT YEAR.<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
Arts in Education Service - School Evaluations <strong>2011</strong>-<strong>2012</strong><br />
Page 154 of 332
ARTIST:<br />
JONATHAN WOLLOCH<br />
TITLE OF PROGRAM: KANDINSKY MUSIC AND ART<br />
TYPE OF PROGRAM: RESIDENCY<br />
DISTRICT/ SCHOOL:<br />
CONTRACT #: A8677<br />
NEW ROCHELLE/TRINITY ELEM. SCHOOL<br />
# OF TEACHERS: 4<br />
# OF STUDENTS: 150 GRADE(S) 2<br />
DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE<br />
4/3-25/12<br />
NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />
STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 X STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4 X<br />
1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />
1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />
2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />
3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />
4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />
5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />
6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />
7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />
THE STUDENTS RESPONDED WELL TO THE PROJECT.<br />
8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />
TIMING WAS A PROBLEM AS MOST STUDENTS FELT THEY DIDN'T<br />
COMPLETE THEIR WORK.<br />
9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />
NONE<br />
ARTIST: JOSEPH BERGAMINI<br />
CONTRACT #: A8645<br />
TITLE OF PROGRAM: BASSOON PLAYER FOR THE SHOW - A FUNNY THING<br />
HAPPENED ON THE WAY TO THE FORUM<br />
TYPE OF PROGRAM: ASSEMBLY<br />
DISTRICT/ SCHOOL:<br />
PUTNAM VALLEY/PUTNAM VALLEY HIGH SCHOOL<br />
# OF TEACHERS: 3<br />
# OF STUDENTS: 400 GRADE(S) 9-12<br />
DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE<br />
4/13-23/12<br />
NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />
STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />
1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />
5<br />
4<br />
5<br />
4<br />
3<br />
4<br />
ARTIST:<br />
JOSEPH ABRAMO<br />
CONTRACT #: A8065<br />
TITLE OF PROGRAM: BANJO, UKUELE & GUITAR PLAYER FOR THE SHOW -<br />
BARNUM<br />
TYPE OF PROGRAM: ASSEMBLY<br />
DISTRICT/ SCHOOL:<br />
NORTH SALEM/NORTH SALEM MS & HS<br />
# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />
# OF STUDENTS: 200 GRADE(S) 6-12<br />
DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE<br />
2/4-12/12<br />
NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />
STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />
1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />
1.<br />
2.<br />
3.<br />
4.<br />
5.<br />
6.<br />
STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />
ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />
EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />
ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />
TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />
QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />
MR. ABRAMO'S SKILL ON STRINGED INSTRUMENTS IS IMPRESSIVE<br />
TO STUDENTS.<br />
8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />
NONE<br />
9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />
NONE<br />
ARTIST: JOSEPH BERTE<br />
CONTRACT #: A8781<br />
TITLE OF PROGRAM: BALLONACY ABC, LETTER SOUNDS AND WORDS<br />
TYPE OF PROGRAM: ASSEMBLY<br />
DISTRICT/ SCHOOL: WHITE PLAINS/MAMARONECK AVENUE ELEM. ELEM.<br />
# OF TEACHERS: 5<br />
# OF STUDENTS: 108 GRADE(S) K<br />
DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 5/16/12<br />
NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />
STANDARD 1 STANDARD 2 STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />
1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />
1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />
2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />
3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />
4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />
5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />
6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />
7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />
NONE<br />
8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />
NONE<br />
9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />
NONE<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />
2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />
3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />
4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />
5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />
6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />
7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />
THE STUDENTS TRULY ENJOYED HIS PUPPETS. THEY WERE<br />
THOROUGHLY ENTERTAINED AND LAUGHED ALL THROUGH THE<br />
SHOW.<br />
8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />
SOME OF THE TEACHING COULD BE MORE CHALLENGING.<br />
9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />
IT WAS A GREAT EXPERIENCE FOR OUR CHILDREN WHO<br />
OTHERWISE MAY NOT HAVE THE OPPORTUNITY TO SEE A REAL<br />
CLOWN.<br />
5<br />
3<br />
4<br />
5<br />
5<br />
N/<br />
Arts in Education Service - School Evaluations <strong>2011</strong>-<strong>2012</strong><br />
Page 155 of 332
ARTIST: JOSEPH FIELDS<br />
CONTRACT #: A7609B<br />
TITLE OF PROGRAM: ADVANCED MAGIC<br />
TYPE OF PROGRAM: WORKSHOP<br />
DISTRICT/ SCHOOL:<br />
# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />
PELHAM/SIWANOY ELEM.<br />
# OF STUDENTS: 13 GRADE(S) 1-5<br />
DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 10/4-11/29/11<br />
NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />
STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 X STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />
ARTIST: JOSEPH FIELDS<br />
CONTRACT #: A8354A<br />
TITLE OF PROGRAM: ADVANCED MAGIC<br />
TYPE OF PROGRAM: WORKSHOP<br />
DISTRICT/ SCHOOL:<br />
# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />
PELHAM/SIWANOY ELEM.<br />
# OF STUDENTS: 11 GRADE(S) 1-5<br />
DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 1/30-3/26/12<br />
NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />
STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 X STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />
1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />
1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />
1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />
2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />
3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />
4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />
5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />
6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />
5<br />
5<br />
4<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />
2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />
3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />
4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />
5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />
6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />
4<br />
4<br />
3<br />
4<br />
4<br />
4<br />
7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM?<br />
THE STUDENTS LOVED IT.<br />
Y<br />
WHY?<br />
7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM?<br />
NONE<br />
Y<br />
WHY?<br />
8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />
NONE<br />
9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />
NONE<br />
8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />
NONE<br />
9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />
NONE<br />
ARTIST: JOSEPH FIELDS<br />
CONTRACT #: A7967<br />
TITLE OF PROGRAM: ART OF MAGIC<br />
TYPE OF PROGRAM: WORKSHOP<br />
DISTRICT/ SCHOOL:<br />
# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />
PELHAM/COLONIAL ELEM.<br />
# OF STUDENTS: 12 GRADE(S) 1-3<br />
DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 12/1/11-2/16/12<br />
NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />
STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 X STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />
ARTIST: JOSEPH FIELDS<br />
CONTRACT #: A8609<br />
TITLE OF PROGRAM: MAGIC<br />
TYPE OF PROGRAM: WORKSHOP<br />
DISTRICT/ SCHOOL: EASTCHESTER/GREENVALE ELEM.<br />
# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />
# OF STUDENTS: 14 GRADE(S) 2-4<br />
DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 3/14-5/9/12<br />
NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />
STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 X STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />
1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />
1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />
1.<br />
2.<br />
3.<br />
4.<br />
5.<br />
6.<br />
STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />
ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />
EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />
ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />
TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />
QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
N/<br />
N/<br />
7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />
THE CHILDREN LOVED THIS CLASS. THEY WERE ATTENTIVE AND<br />
HAD A LOT OF FUN WHILE LEARNING TRICKS AND HOW TO<br />
PERFORM MAGIC TRICKS IN FRONT OF AN AUDIENCE.<br />
8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />
NONE<br />
9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />
JOE IS A VERY GOOD TEACHER AND ENTERTAINER.<br />
1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />
2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />
3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />
4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />
5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />
6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />
7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />
WONDERFUL INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS.<br />
8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />
NONE<br />
9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />
NONE<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
N/<br />
Arts in Education Service - School Evaluations <strong>2011</strong>-<strong>2012</strong><br />
Page 156 of 332
ARTIST: JOSEPH FIELDS<br />
CONTRACT #: A7663<br />
TITLE OF PROGRAM: MAGIC<br />
TYPE OF PROGRAM: WORKSHOP<br />
DISTRICT/ SCHOOL: EASTCHESTER/GREENVALE ELEM.<br />
# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />
# OF STUDENTS: 18 GRADE(S) 2-4<br />
DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 10/19-12/14/11<br />
NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />
STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 X STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />
ARTIST: JOSEPH FIELDS<br />
CONTRACT #: A8354B<br />
TITLE OF PROGRAM: MAGIC - BASIC<br />
TYPE OF PROGRAM: WORKSHOP<br />
DISTRICT/ SCHOOL:<br />
# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />
PELHAM/SIWANOY ELEM.<br />
# OF STUDENTS: 10 GRADE(S) 1-5<br />
DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 1/30-3/26/12<br />
NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />
STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 X STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />
1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />
1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />
1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />
2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />
3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />
4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />
5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />
6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
N/<br />
1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />
2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />
3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />
4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />
5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />
6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />
4<br />
4<br />
4<br />
3<br />
4<br />
4<br />
7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />
AWESOME CLASS, AWESOME TEACHER. JOSEPH IS A CLASS<br />
FAVORITE.<br />
8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />
NONE<br />
9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />
NONE<br />
7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM?<br />
NONE<br />
8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />
NONE<br />
9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />
NONE<br />
Y<br />
WHY?<br />
ARTIST: JOSEPH FIELDS<br />
CONTRACT #: A7609A<br />
TITLE OF PROGRAM: MAGIC - BASIC<br />
TYPE OF PROGRAM: WORKSHOP<br />
DISTRICT/ SCHOOL:<br />
# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />
PELHAM/SIWANOY ELEM.<br />
# OF STUDENTS: 9 GRADE(S) K & 1<br />
DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 12/20/11<br />
NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />
STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 X STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />
ARTIST: JOSEPH FIELDS<br />
CONTRACT #: A8058A<br />
TITLE OF PROGRAM: MAGIC I<br />
TYPE OF PROGRAM: WORKSHOP<br />
DISTRICT/ SCHOOL:<br />
# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />
PELHAM/PROSPECT HILL ELEM.<br />
# OF STUDENTS: 20 GRADE(S) 3-5<br />
DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 1/11-3/7/12<br />
NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />
STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 X STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />
1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />
1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />
1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />
2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />
3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />
4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />
5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />
6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />
5<br />
5<br />
4<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />
2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />
3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />
4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />
5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />
6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
N/<br />
7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM?<br />
THE STUDENTS LOVED IT.<br />
Y<br />
WHY?<br />
7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM?<br />
NONE<br />
Y<br />
WHY?<br />
8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />
NONE<br />
9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />
NONE<br />
8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />
NONE<br />
9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />
NONE<br />
Arts in Education Service - School Evaluations <strong>2011</strong>-<strong>2012</strong><br />
Page 157 of 332
ARTIST: JOSEPH FIELDS<br />
CONTRACT #: A8058B<br />
TITLE OF PROGRAM: MAGIC II<br />
TYPE OF PROGRAM: WORKSHOP<br />
DISTRICT/ SCHOOL:<br />
# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />
PELHAM/PROSPECT HILL ELEM.<br />
# OF STUDENTS: 20 GRADE(S) K-2<br />
DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 1/13-3/9/12<br />
NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />
STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 X STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />
ARTIST: JOSEPH MULLINS<br />
CONTRACT #: A8790<br />
TITLE OF PROGRAM: GYOTAKU FISH PRINTS<br />
TYPE OF PROGRAM: WORKSHOP<br />
DISTRICT/ SCHOOL: NEW ROCHELLE/TRINITY ELEM. SCHOOL<br />
# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />
# OF STUDENTS: 172 GRADE(S) 3<br />
DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 5/7-9/12<br />
NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />
STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 X STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4 X<br />
1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />
1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />
1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />
2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />
3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />
4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />
5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />
6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />
7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />
NONE<br />
8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />
NONE<br />
9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />
NONE<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
N/<br />
1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />
2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />
3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />
4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />
5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />
6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />
7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />
STUDENTS WERE ENGAGED AND EXCITED AND JOE WAS WELL<br />
ORGANIZED AND WELL RECEIVED.<br />
8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />
TIMING WAS A SLIGHT PROBLEM. NEED AT LEAST AN HOUR FOR<br />
THE WORKSHOP NEXT TIME.<br />
9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />
NONE<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
4<br />
5<br />
ARTIST: JOSEPH MURPHY<br />
CONTRACT #: A7508B<br />
TITLE OF PROGRAM: 3D GRAPHIC ART & ANIMATION<br />
TYPE OF PROGRAM: WORKSHOP<br />
DISTRICT/ SCHOOL: KATONAH/LEWISBORO/INCREASE MILLER ELEM.<br />
# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />
# OF STUDENTS: 7 GRADE(S) 3-5<br />
DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 10/6-12/8/11<br />
NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />
STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 X STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />
ARTIST: JOSEPH MURPHY<br />
CONTRACT #: A8226A<br />
TITLE OF PROGRAM: ELECTRONIC MUSIC STUDIO<br />
TYPE OF PROGRAM: WORKSHOP<br />
DISTRICT/ SCHOOL: KATONAH/LEWISBORO/INCREASE MILLER ELEM.<br />
# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />
# OF STUDENTS: 7 GRADE(S) 3-5<br />
DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 1/17-3/13/12<br />
NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />
STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 X STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />
1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />
1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />
1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />
2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />
3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />
4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />
5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />
6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />
7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />
THE BRYCE GRAPHIC DESIGN PROGRAM PROVIDES A GREAT<br />
LEARNING EXPERIENCE FOR STUDENTS.<br />
8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />
NONE<br />
9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />
NONE<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
N/<br />
1.<br />
2.<br />
3.<br />
4.<br />
5.<br />
6.<br />
STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />
ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />
EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />
ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />
TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />
QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
N/<br />
7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />
WE GET REPEAT STUDENTS FOR THIS CLASS. STUDENTS ENJOY IT<br />
SO MUCH THEY ASK THEIR PARENTS TO SIGN THEM UP AGAIN.<br />
8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />
NONE<br />
9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />
NONE<br />
Arts in Education Service - School Evaluations <strong>2011</strong>-<strong>2012</strong><br />
Page 158 of 332
ARTIST: JOSEPH MURPHY<br />
CONTRACT #: A8226B<br />
TITLE OF PROGRAM: GRAPHIC DESIGN<br />
TYPE OF PROGRAM: WORKSHOP<br />
DISTRICT/ SCHOOL: KATONAH/LEWISBORO/INCREASE MILLER ELEM.<br />
# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />
# OF STUDENTS: 9 GRADE(S) 3-5<br />
DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 1/18-3/14/12<br />
NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />
STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 X STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />
ARTIST: JOSEPH PETRIZZO<br />
CONTRACT #: A8575<br />
TITLE OF PROGRAM: TROMBONE PLAYER FOR THE SHOW - SUGAR<br />
TYPE OF PROGRAM: ASSEMBLY<br />
DISTRICT/ SCHOOL: BRIARCLIFF/BRIARCLIFF HIGH SCHOOL<br />
# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />
# OF STUDENTS: 70 GRADE(S) 9-12<br />
DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 3/4-11/12<br />
NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />
STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />
1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />
1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />
1.<br />
2.<br />
3.<br />
4.<br />
5.<br />
6.<br />
STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />
ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />
EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />
ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />
TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />
QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />
JOE IS A FABULOUS TEACHER WHO IS LOVED BY ALL. HE MAKES<br />
LEARNING FUN.<br />
8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />
NONE<br />
9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />
NONE<br />
1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />
2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />
3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />
4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />
5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />
6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />
7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />
EXCELLENT USE OF BROADWAY THEATRICAL TECHNIQUES.<br />
8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />
NONE<br />
9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />
NONE<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
ARTIST: JOSEPH RYAN<br />
CONTRACT #: A7530<br />
TITLE OF PROGRAM: LIVING HISTORY - LIFE AN AN AMERICAN<br />
REVOLUTIONARY WAR SOLDIER<br />
TYPE OF PROGRAM: ASSEMBLY<br />
DISTRICT/ SCHOOL:<br />
# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />
LAKELAND/VAN CORT ELEM.<br />
# OF STUDENTS: 100 GRADE(S) 5<br />
DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 6/13/12<br />
NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />
STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4 X<br />
ARTIST: JOSEPH RYAN<br />
CONTRACT #: A8480<br />
TITLE OF PROGRAM: LIVING HISTORY - LIFE OF AN AMERICAN<br />
REVOLUTIONARY WAR SOLDIER<br />
TYPE OF PROGRAM: ASSEMBLY<br />
DISTRICT/ SCHOOL: LAKELAND/BENJAMIN FRANKLIN ELEM.<br />
# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />
# OF STUDENTS: 102 GRADE(S) 4<br />
DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 5/1/12<br />
NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />
STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4 X<br />
1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />
1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />
1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />
2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />
3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />
4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />
5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />
6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />
7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />
JOE CONTINUES TO DO A FANTASTIC JOB FOR MAKING HISTORY<br />
COME ALIVE. HE IS AN AMAZING PRESENTER.<br />
8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />
NONE<br />
9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />
THANKS AGAIN AND I HOPE WE WILL BE LUCKY ENOUGH TO HAVE<br />
HIM BACK NEXT YEAR.<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
1.<br />
2.<br />
3.<br />
4.<br />
5.<br />
6.<br />
STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />
ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />
EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />
ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />
TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />
QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />
THE STUDENTS ARE ALWAYS ENGAGED AND CAME AWAY WITH A<br />
WEALTH OF KNOWLEDGE.<br />
8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />
NONE<br />
9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />
NONE<br />
Arts in Education Service - School Evaluations <strong>2011</strong>-<strong>2012</strong><br />
Page 159 of 332
ARTIST: JOSEPH RYAN<br />
CONTRACT #: A8776<br />
TITLE OF PROGRAM: LIVING HISTORY - LIFE OF AN AMERICAN<br />
REVOLUTIONARY WAR SOLDIER<br />
TYPE OF PROGRAM: ASSEMBLY<br />
DISTRICT/ SCHOOL:<br />
# OF TEACHERS: 3<br />
LAKELAND/LINCOLN-TITUS ELEM.<br />
# OF STUDENTS: 70 GRADE(S) 4<br />
DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 5/4/12<br />
NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />
STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4 X<br />
ARTIST: JOSEPH SIPOS<br />
CONTRACT #: A8246<br />
TITLE OF PROGRAM: SET DESIGNER ASST. FOR THE SHOW - THE<br />
DROWSY CHAPERONE<br />
TYPE OF PROGRAM: RESIDENCY<br />
DISTRICT/ SCHOOL: KATONAH/LEWISBORO/JOHN JAY MIDDLE SCHOOL<br />
# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />
# OF STUDENTS: 75 GRADE(S) 6-8<br />
DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 1/15-3/15/12<br />
NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />
STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 X STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />
1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />
1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />
1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />
2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />
3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />
4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />
5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />
6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />
7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />
JOE WAS ENGAGING AND KNOWLEDGEABLE. HE PROVIDED A<br />
DYNAMIC AND INTERACTIVE PRESENTATION.<br />
8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />
TEACHERS NEED TO BE NOTIFIED PRIOR TO THE DAY THAT AV<br />
EQUIPMENT IS NEEDED. ALSO, SCHOOLS NEED ADVANCE<br />
NOTIFICATION OF THE MUSKET FIRING DEMONSTRATION FOR<br />
SECURITY REASONS AND TO ADDRESS THE CONCERNS OF<br />
CHILDREN WITH SPECIAL NEEDS.<br />
9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />
NONE<br />
5<br />
5<br />
4<br />
5<br />
5<br />
N/<br />
1.<br />
2.<br />
3.<br />
4.<br />
5.<br />
6.<br />
STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />
ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />
EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />
ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />
TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />
QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
1<br />
1<br />
N/<br />
7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />
JOE CONSTRUCTED THE MOST AMAZING SETS. THIS SHOW WILL<br />
BE HARD TO TOP.<br />
8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />
NONE<br />
9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />
NONE<br />
ARTIST: JOSEPH SIPOS<br />
CONTRACT #: A7639<br />
TITLE OF PROGRAM: SET DESIGNER ASST. FOR THE SHOW - TWILIGHT<br />
ZONE<br />
TYPE OF PROGRAM: RESIDENCY<br />
DISTRICT/ SCHOOL: KATONAH/LEWISBORO/JOHN JAY MIDDLE SCHOOL<br />
# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />
# OF STUDENTS: 45 GRADE(S) 6-8<br />
DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 10/3-11/8/11<br />
NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />
STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 X STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />
1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />
ARTIST: JOSEPH STAMBONI<br />
CONTRACT #: A8576<br />
TITLE OF PROGRAM: TRUMPET PLAYER FOR THE SHOW - SUGAR<br />
TYPE OF PROGRAM: ASSEMBLY<br />
DISTRICT/ SCHOOL: BRIARCLIFF/BRIARCLIFF HIGH SCHOOL<br />
# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />
# OF STUDENTS: 70 GRADE(S) 9-12<br />
DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 3/4-11/12<br />
NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />
STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />
1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />
1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />
2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />
3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />
4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />
5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />
6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />
7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />
JOE IS A MASTER AT WHAT HE DOES. HE IS CREATIVE, PATIENT<br />
AND VERY FLEXIBLE ABOUT LAST MINUTE CHANGES.<br />
8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />
NONE<br />
9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />
NONE<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
N/<br />
1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />
2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />
3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />
4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />
5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />
6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />
7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />
THE INTERACTION BETWEEN STUDENTS AND PROFESSIONAL<br />
MUSICIANS WAS INVALUABLE.<br />
8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />
NONE<br />
9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />
NONE<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
N/<br />
Arts in Education Service - School Evaluations <strong>2011</strong>-<strong>2012</strong><br />
Page 160 of 332
ARTIST: JOSEPH STELLUTI<br />
CONTRACT #: A8431<br />
TITLE OF PROGRAM: SAX, CLARINET & FLUTE PLAYER FOR THE - SHOW<br />
THE DROWSY CHAPERONE<br />
TYPE OF PROGRAM: ASSEMBLY<br />
DISTRICT/ SCHOOL: KATONAH/LEWISBORO/JOHN JAY MIDDLE SCHOOL<br />
# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />
# OF STUDENTS: 75 GRADE(S) 6-8<br />
DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 3/3-17/12<br />
NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />
STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />
1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />
ARTIST: JOSEPH TRIONFERO dba SHOW OF LOV<br />
CONTRACT #: A7959<br />
TITLE OF PROGRAM: CHARACTER ED SHOW<br />
TYPE OF PROGRAM: ASSEMBLY<br />
DISTRICT/ SCHOOL: CHAPPAQUA/WESTORCHARD ELEM.<br />
# OF TEACHERS: 5<br />
# OF STUDENTS: 53 GRADE(S) K-4<br />
DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 1/5/12<br />
NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />
STANDARD 1 STANDARD 2 STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />
1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />
1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />
2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />
3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />
4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />
5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />
6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />
7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />
THE PIT ORCHESTRA WAS AWESOME.<br />
8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />
NONE<br />
9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />
NONE<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
N/<br />
1.<br />
2.<br />
3.<br />
4.<br />
5.<br />
6.<br />
STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />
ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />
EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />
ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />
TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />
QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />
3<br />
3<br />
3<br />
3<br />
3<br />
3<br />
7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />
IT'S GETTING FURTHER FROM THE POINT AND MORE GAME SHOW.<br />
I'M NOT SURE THE YOUNGER STUDENTS GOT IT.<br />
8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />
NONE<br />
9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />
NONE<br />
ARTIST: JOSEPH WALLACE<br />
CONTRACT #: A8505<br />
TITLE OF PROGRAM: STORYTELLING & CREATIVE WRITING RESIDENCY<br />
TYPE OF PROGRAM: RESIDENCY<br />
DISTRICT/ SCHOOL: PLEASANTVILLE/BEDFORD ROAD ELEM.<br />
# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />
# OF STUDENTS: 125 GRADE(S) 4<br />
DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 2/28-3/26/12<br />
NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />
STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />
ARTIST: JOURNEYS INTO AMERICAN INDIAN TER CONTRACT #: A7829<br />
TITLE OF PROGRAM: ROBERT VETTER - EASTERN WOODLAND INDIANS<br />
TYPE OF PROGRAM: ASSEMBLY/WORKSHOP<br />
DISTRICT/ SCHOOL:<br />
# OF TEACHERS: 5<br />
TUCKAHOE/W. E. COTTLE ELEM.<br />
# OF STUDENTS: 100 GRADE(S) 4<br />
DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 11/3/11<br />
NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />
STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 X STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4 X<br />
1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />
1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />
1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />
2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />
3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />
4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />
5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />
6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />
7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />
THE CHILDREN LOVED HEARING HIS STORIES AND HE TRULY<br />
INSPIRED THEM TO BE MORE CREATIVE WRITERS.<br />
8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />
NONE<br />
9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />
NONE<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
4<br />
1.<br />
2.<br />
3.<br />
4.<br />
5.<br />
6.<br />
STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />
ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />
EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />
ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />
TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />
QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
N/<br />
7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />
THE TEACHERS AND STUDENTS LOVE THIS PROGRAM. IT<br />
CORRELATES PERFECTLY WITH THEIR COURSE OF STUDY. ITS FUN<br />
AND EDUCATIONAL.<br />
8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />
NONE<br />
9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />
LOOKING FORWARD TO NEXT YEAR.<br />
Arts in Education Service - School Evaluations <strong>2011</strong>-<strong>2012</strong><br />
Page 161 of 332
ARTIST: JOURNEYS INTO AMERICAN INDIAN TER CONTRACT #: A8833<br />
TITLE OF PROGRAM: ROBERT VETTER - EASTERN WOODLAND INDIANS<br />
TYPE OF PROGRAM: ASSEMBLY/WORKSHOP<br />
DISTRICT/ SCHOOL: HENDRICK HUDSON/FURNACE WOODS ELEM.<br />
# OF TEACHERS: 3<br />
# OF STUDENTS: 71 GRADE(S) 4<br />
DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 6/8/12<br />
NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />
STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 X STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4 X<br />
ARTIST: JOURNEYS INTO AMERICAN INDIAN TER CONTRACT #: A7543<br />
TITLE OF PROGRAM: ROBERT VETTER - EASTERN WOODLAND INDIANS<br />
TYPE OF PROGRAM: ASSEMBLY/WORKSHOP<br />
DISTRICT/ SCHOOL:<br />
# OF TEACHERS: 5<br />
CHAPPAQUA/GRAFFLIN ELEM.<br />
# OF STUDENTS: 125 GRADE(S) 4 & 5<br />
DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 12/6/11<br />
NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />
STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 X STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4 X<br />
1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />
1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />
1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />
2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />
3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />
4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />
5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />
6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />
7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />
THIS WAS A WONDERFUL, HANDS ON MEMORABLE DAY. THE<br />
STUDENTS WERE THRILLED TO HAVE THIS OPPORTUNITY.<br />
8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />
WOULD REALLY LIKE TO HAVE SEEN THE PRINTABLE STUDENT<br />
WORKSHEETS THAT WERE ADVERTISED AS A FOLLOW UP TO THE<br />
DAY.<br />
9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />
WE REALLY WERE IMPRESSED WITH THE QUALITY OF THE<br />
PROGRAM.<br />
ARTIST: JOURNEYS INTO AMERICAN INDIAN TER CONTRACT #: A7657<br />
TITLE OF PROGRAM: ROBERT VETTER - EASTERN WOODLAND INDIANS<br />
TYPE OF PROGRAM: ASSEMBLY/WORKSHOP<br />
DISTRICT/ SCHOOL:<br />
LAKELAND/GEORGE WASHINGTON ELEM.<br />
# OF TEACHERS: 3<br />
# OF STUDENTS: 64 GRADE(S) 4<br />
DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE<br />
9/20/11<br />
NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />
STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 X STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4 X<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
1.<br />
2.<br />
3.<br />
4.<br />
5.<br />
6.<br />
STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />
ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />
EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />
ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />
TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />
QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />
ABSOLUTELY. A WONDERFUL HANDS-ON LEARNING EXPERIENCE.<br />
8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />
NONE<br />
9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />
NONE<br />
ARTIST: JOURNEYS INTO AMERICAN INDIAN TER CONTRACT #: A8208<br />
TITLE OF PROGRAM: ROBERT VETTER - EASTERN WOODLAND INDIANS<br />
TYPE OF PROGRAM: ASSEMBLY/WORKSHOP<br />
DISTRICT/ SCHOOL:<br />
CHAPPAQUA/ROARING BROOK ELEM.<br />
# OF TEACHERS: 5<br />
# OF STUDENTS: 102 GRADE(S) 4<br />
DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 1/24/12<br />
NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />
STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 X STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4 X<br />
1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />
1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />
1.<br />
2.<br />
3.<br />
4.<br />
5.<br />
6.<br />
STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />
ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />
EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />
ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />
TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />
QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />
4<br />
5<br />
5<br />
4<br />
3<br />
5<br />
7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />
THIS PROGRAM IS VERY HARDS-ON AND MOTIVATING TO THE<br />
STUDENTS. MANY DIFFERENT ACTIVITIES ALLOW STUDENTS TO<br />
REMAIN ENGAGED.<br />
8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />
NONE<br />
9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />
NONE<br />
1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />
2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />
3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />
4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />
5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />
6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />
7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />
RICH EXPERIENCE AND THE STUDENTS WERE ENGAGED.<br />
8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />
WOULD BENEFIT FROM VISUAL SUPPORTS.<br />
9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />
AN AMAZING PROGRAM.<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
N/<br />
Arts in Education Service - School Evaluations <strong>2011</strong>-<strong>2012</strong><br />
Page 162 of 332
ARTIST: JOURNEYS INTO AMERICAN INDIAN TER CONTRACT #: A7895<br />
TITLE OF PROGRAM: ROBERT VETTER - EASTERN WOODLAND INDIANS<br />
TYPE OF PROGRAM: ASSEMBLY/WORKSHOP<br />
DISTRICT/ SCHOOL: DOBBS FERRY/SPRINGHURST ELEM.<br />
# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />
# OF STUDENTS: 125 GRADE(S) 4<br />
DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 11/9/11<br />
NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />
STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 X STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4 X<br />
ARTIST: JOURNEYS INTO AMERICAN INDIAN TER CONTRACT #: A7754<br />
TITLE OF PROGRAM: ROBERT VETTER - EASTERN WOODLAND INDIANS<br />
TYPE OF PROGRAM: ASSEMBLY/WORKSHOP<br />
DISTRICT/ SCHOOL:<br />
# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />
PELHAM/COLONIAL ELEM.<br />
# OF STUDENTS: 46 GRADE(S) 4<br />
DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 12/16/11<br />
NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />
STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 X STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4 X<br />
1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />
1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />
1.<br />
2.<br />
3.<br />
4.<br />
5.<br />
6.<br />
STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />
ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />
EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />
ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />
TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />
QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
3<br />
N/<br />
7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />
THE PRESENTERS CLEARLY KNEW THEIR CONTENT AND ENGAGED<br />
THE STUDENTS. THEIR MUSEUM SETUP WAS VERY ORGANIZED<br />
AND THEY WERE A PLEASURE TO WORK WITH.<br />
8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />
ALLOCATE MORE TIME FOR MUSEUM, LESS TIME FOR GAMES.<br />
9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />
CHILDREN CLEARLY ENJOYED THE PROGRAM.<br />
1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />
2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />
3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />
4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />
5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />
6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />
7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />
PROGRAM WAS COMPREHENSIVE, INFORMATIVE AND FUN. THE<br />
VARIETY OF ACTIVITIES ENGAGED EACH CHILD.<br />
8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />
NONE<br />
9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />
GREAT DAY. THANK YOU.<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
ARTIST: JOURNEYS INTO AMERICAN INDIAN TER CONTRACT #: A7940<br />
TITLE OF PROGRAM: ROBERT VETTER - EASTERN WOODLAND INDIANS<br />
TYPE OF PROGRAM: ASSEMBLY/WORKSHOP<br />
DISTRICT/ SCHOOL: LAKELAND/THOMAS JEFFERSON ELEM.<br />
# OF TEACHERS: 3<br />
# OF STUDENTS: 72 GRADE(S) 4<br />
DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 5/30/12<br />
NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />
STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 X STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4 X<br />
ARTIST: JOURNEYS INTO AMERICAN INDIAN TER CONTRACT #: A8843<br />
TITLE OF PROGRAM: ROBERT VETTER - EASTERN WOODLAND INDIANS<br />
TYPE OF PROGRAM: ASSEMBLY/WORKSHOP<br />
DISTRICT/ SCHOOL: HENDRICK HUDSON/FRANK G. LINDSEY ELEM.<br />
# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />
# OF STUDENTS: GRADE(S) 4<br />
DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 6/6/12<br />
NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />
STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 X STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4 X<br />
1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />
1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />
1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />
2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />
3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />
4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />
5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />
6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />
7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? ? WHY?<br />
THERE WAS A LOT OF LECTURING/COMMENTARY ABOUT<br />
INACCURATE TEXT BOOKS AND HOW TEACHERS HAD TAUGHT<br />
INACCURATE INFORMATION. WE TEACH AND ARE BOUND BY NYS<br />
GUIDELINES. VENTING TO 4TH GRADERS ABOUT GOVERNMENT IS<br />
NOT THE PROPER OR APPROPRIATE FORUM.<br />
8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />
NOT AGE APPROPRIATE AT TIMES. YOUR VIDEO WAS GRAPHIC<br />
AND DISTURBING TO SOME OF THE CHILDREN. WE DO NOT TEACH<br />
ABOUT THE HOLOCAUST IN 4TH GRADE. DID NOT KEEP STUDENTS<br />
ENGAGED AND LEFT ROOM FOR MISBEHAVIOR.<br />
9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />
WE HAD A DIFFERENT PRESENTER THIS YEAR. MUCH MORE<br />
LECTURING THEN PREVIOUS YEARS. IF WE USE AGAIN, WE WANT<br />
OUR USUAL PRESENTERS.<br />
3<br />
3<br />
3<br />
3<br />
3<br />
4<br />
1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />
2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />
3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />
4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />
5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />
6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />
7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />
THIS IS A WONDERFUL, INTERACTIVE WORKSHOPS. THE<br />
STORYTELLING WAS FANTASTIC.<br />
8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />
WEATHER PERMITTING, WE COULD MOVE SOME OF THE ACTIVITIES<br />
OUTSIDE.<br />
9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />
NONE<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
Arts in Education Service - School Evaluations <strong>2011</strong>-<strong>2012</strong><br />
Page 163 of 332
ARTIST: JOURNEYS INTO AMERICAN INDIAN TER CONTRACT #: A8611<br />
TITLE OF PROGRAM: ROBERT VETTER - EASTERN WOODLAND INDIANS<br />
TYPE OF PROGRAM: ASSEMBLY/WORKSHOP<br />
DISTRICT/ SCHOOL:<br />
# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />
PELHAM/SIWANOY ELEM.<br />
# OF STUDENTS: 48 GRADE(S) 4<br />
DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 3/13/12<br />
NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />
STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 X STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4 X<br />
ARTIST: JOURNEYS INTO AMERICAN INDIAN TER CONTRACT #: A8847<br />
TITLE OF PROGRAM: ROBERT VETTER - EASTERN WOODLAND INDIANS<br />
TYPE OF PROGRAM: ASSEMBLY/WORKSHOP<br />
DISTRICT/ SCHOOL: HENDRICK HUDSON/BUCHANAN/VERPLANCK ELEM.<br />
# OF TEACHERS: 4<br />
# OF STUDENTS: 48 GRADE(S) 4<br />
DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 6/5/12<br />
NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />
STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 X STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4 X<br />
1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />
1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />
1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />
2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />
3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />
4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />
5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />
6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />
7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />
OUTSTANDING MANAGEMENT OF THE GROUP AND EXTREMELY<br />
ENGAGING. THE MUSEUM, LONGHOURSE, GAMES AND<br />
STORYTELLING ARE INCREDIBLE.<br />
8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />
NONE<br />
9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />
WE FEEL SO LUCKY TO HAVE HAD THIS PROGRAM. THANK YOU<br />
FOR ENRICHING OUR CURRICULUM.<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
1.<br />
2.<br />
3.<br />
4.<br />
5.<br />
6.<br />
STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />
ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />
EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />
ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />
TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />
QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />
THE PROGRAM WAS VERY ENGAGING AS WELL AS THE HANDS-ON<br />
ACTIVITIES. THE PRESENTERS WERE VERY KNOWLEDGEABLE.<br />
THE STUDENTS HAD A GREAT TIME.<br />
8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />
NONE<br />
9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />
GREAT PROGRAM.<br />
ARTIST: JOURNEYS INTO AMERICAN INDIAN TER CONTRACT #: A7958<br />
TITLE OF PROGRAM: ROBERT VETTER - EASTERN WOODLAND INDIANS<br />
TYPE OF PROGRAM: ASSEMBLY/WORKSHOP<br />
DISTRICT/ SCHOOL:<br />
# OF TEACHERS: 3<br />
PELHAM/HUTCHINSON ELEM.<br />
# OF STUDENTS: 60 GRADE(S) 4<br />
DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 12/5/11<br />
NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />
STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 X STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4 X<br />
ARTIST: JOY ENGEL<br />
CONTRACT #: A8411<br />
TITLE OF PROGRAM: CINCO DE MAYO<br />
TYPE OF PROGRAM: ASSEMBLY<br />
DISTRICT/ SCHOOL: KATONAH/LEWISBORO/LEWISBORO ELEM.<br />
# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />
# OF STUDENTS: 39 GRADE(S) K<br />
DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 5/4/12<br />
NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />
STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4 X<br />
1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />
1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />
1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />
2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />
3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />
4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />
5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />
6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />
2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />
3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />
4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />
5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />
6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />
THIS PROGRAM CONTINUES TO BE A VALUABLE INTERACTIVE<br />
EXPERIENCE FOR OUR STUDENTS.<br />
8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />
NONE<br />
9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />
THE PROGRAM RAN SMOOTHLY, WAS ENGAGING TO STUDENTS<br />
AND IS ALWAYS ENTREMELY ORGANIZED.<br />
7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM?<br />
NONE<br />
8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />
NONE<br />
9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />
NONE<br />
Y<br />
WHY?<br />
Arts in Education Service - School Evaluations <strong>2011</strong>-<strong>2012</strong><br />
Page 164 of 332
ARTIST: JOY ENGEL<br />
CONTRACT #: A8799<br />
TITLE OF PROGRAM: CINCO DE MAYO<br />
TYPE OF PROGRAM: WORKSHOP<br />
DISTRICT/ SCHOOL: KATONAH/LEWISBORO/MEADOWPOND ELEM.<br />
# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />
# OF STUDENTS: 47 GRADE(S) K<br />
DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 5/5/12<br />
NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />
STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4 X<br />
ARTIST: JOY ENGEL<br />
CONTRACT #: A7869<br />
TITLE OF PROGRAM: INTRO TO NUTCRACKER<br />
TYPE OF PROGRAM: WORKSHOP<br />
DISTRICT/ SCHOOL: KATONAH/LEWISBORO/LEWISBORO ELEM.<br />
# OF TEACHERS: 2<br />
# OF STUDENTS: 72 GRADE(S) 2<br />
DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 12/6/11<br />
NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />
STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />
1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />
1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />
1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />
2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />
3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />
4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />
5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />
6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />
7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />
MS. ENGEL IS A HIGHLY QUALIFIED DANCER AND INSTRUCTOR.<br />
SHE RELATES VERY WELL TO CHILDREN.<br />
8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />
NONE<br />
9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />
HAVE TEACHERS PROVIDE NAME TAGS WITH FIRST NAMES<br />
INCLUDED IN DIRECTIONS.<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
N/<br />
1.<br />
2.<br />
3.<br />
4.<br />
5.<br />
6.<br />
STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />
ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />
EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />
ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />
TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />
QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
N/<br />
7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />
WE WOULD HIGHLY RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM. IT ENRICHES<br />
OUR LEARNING EXPERIENCE THROUGH THE ARTS AND ALLOWS<br />
THE CHILDREN TO ROLE PLAY CHARACTERS WITH COSTUMES,<br />
MUSIC, PHOTOGRAPHS, STORYTELLING AND BEHIND THE SCEENS<br />
INFORMATION.<br />
8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />
NONE<br />
9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />
JOY CONTINUES TO ENRICH OUR LEARNING WITH HER<br />
KNOWLEDGE, PROFESSIONALISM, CREATIVITY EXPERIENCE AND<br />
UNDERSTANDING OF CHILDREN AND THE ARTS.<br />
ARTIST: JOY ENGEL<br />
CONTRACT #: A7983<br />
TITLE OF PROGRAM: INTRO TO NUTCRACKER<br />
TYPE OF PROGRAM: WORKSHOP<br />
DISTRICT/ SCHOOL: KATONAH/LEWISBORO/MEADOWPOND ELEM.<br />
# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />
# OF STUDENTS: 68 GRADE(S) 2<br />
DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 12/5/11<br />
NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />
STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />
1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />
ARTIST: JOY PLAISTED<br />
CONTRACT #: A8656<br />
TITLE OF PROGRAM: HARP PLAYER FOR THE SHOW - A FUNNY THING<br />
HAPPENED ON THE WAY TO THE FORUM<br />
TYPE OF PROGRAM: ASSEMBLY<br />
DISTRICT/ SCHOOL: PUTNAM VALLEY/PUTNAM VALLEY HIGH SCHOOL<br />
# OF TEACHERS: 3<br />
# OF STUDENTS: 400 GRADE(S) 9-12<br />
DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 4/13-23/12<br />
NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />
STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />
1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />
1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />
2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />
3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />
4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />
5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />
6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />
7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />
EXCELLENT AS ALWAYS. WE LOOK FORWARD TO NEXT YEAR.<br />
8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />
NONE<br />
9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />
THE STUDENTS GAIN AN APPRECIATION OF BALLET AND THE ARTS.<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />
2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />
3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />
4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />
5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />
6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />
7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />
NONE<br />
8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />
NONE<br />
9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />
NONE<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
N/<br />
Arts in Education Service - School Evaluations <strong>2011</strong>-<strong>2012</strong><br />
Page 165 of 332
ARTIST: JOY PLAISTED<br />
CONTRACT #: A8530<br />
TITLE OF PROGRAM: HARP PLAYER FOR THE SHOW - ONCE UPON A<br />
MATTRESS<br />
TYPE OF PROGRAM: ASSEMBLY<br />
DISTRICT/ SCHOOL:<br />
# OF TEACHERS: 2<br />
SOMERS/SOMERS HIGH SCHOOL<br />
# OF STUDENTS: 50 GRADE(S) 9-12<br />
DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 3/12-18/12<br />
NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />
STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />
ARTIST: JUDITH BENJAMIN<br />
CONTRACT #: A8509<br />
TITLE OF PROGRAM: VIOLIN PLAYER FOR THE SHOW - BEAUTY AND THE<br />
BEAST<br />
TYPE OF PROGRAM: ASSEMBLY<br />
DISTRICT/ SCHOOL: PLEASANTVILLE/PLEASANTVILLE HIGH SCHOOL<br />
# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />
# OF STUDENTS: 400 GRADE(S) 9-12<br />
DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 3/9-17/12<br />
NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />
STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />
1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />
1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />
1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />
2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />
3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />
4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />
5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />
6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />
2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />
3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />
4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />
5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />
6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
N/<br />
5<br />
N/<br />
7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM?<br />
NONE<br />
Y<br />
WHY?<br />
7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y<br />
DISTRICTS AROUND SHOULD SEE THIS PRODUCTION.<br />
WHY?<br />
8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />
NONE<br />
9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />
NONE<br />
8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />
NOTHING ABSOLUTELY FANTASTIC.<br />
9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />
NONE<br />
ARTIST: JUDITH FUHRER<br />
CONTRACT #: A7815<br />
TITLE OF PROGRAM: ART & CULTURE OF YOGA<br />
TYPE OF PROGRAM: RESIDENCY<br />
DISTRICT/ SCHOOL: CHAPPAQUA/ROARING BROOK ELEM.<br />
# OF TEACHERS: 2<br />
# OF STUDENTS: 550 GRADE(S) K-4<br />
DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 10/24-11/4/11<br />
NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />
STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 X STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4 X<br />
ARTIST: JUDITH FUHRER<br />
CONTRACT #: A8809<br />
TITLE OF PROGRAM: ART & CULTURE OF YOGA<br />
TYPE OF PROGRAM: WORKSHOP<br />
DISTRICT/ SCHOOL: CHAPPAQUA/ROARING BROOK ELEM.<br />
# OF TEACHERS: 2<br />
# OF STUDENTS: 550 GRADE(S) K-4<br />
DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 4/23-5/4/12<br />
NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />
STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 X STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4 X<br />
1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />
1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />
1.<br />
2.<br />
3.<br />
4.<br />
5.<br />
6.<br />
STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />
ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />
EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />
ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />
TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />
QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />
JUDY'S PROGRAM HAS BENEFITED COUNTLESS NUMBER OF OUR<br />
STUDENTS.<br />
8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />
NONE<br />
9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />
I WISH JUDY GREAT SUCCESS WITH HER PROGRAM AND LOOK<br />
FORWARD TO SEEING HER THIS SPRING.<br />
1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />
2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />
3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />
4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />
5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />
6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />
7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />
JUDY HAS SUCH A WONDERFUL PRESENCE ABOUT HER THAT IS<br />
CONVEYED INTO HER TEACHINGS.<br />
8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />
NONE<br />
9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />
THE STUDENTS ENJOYED HER CLASS.<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
Arts in Education Service - School Evaluations <strong>2011</strong>-<strong>2012</strong><br />
Page 166 of 332
ARTIST: JULIE BAKER<br />
CONTRACT #: A8506<br />
TITLE OF PROGRAM: SCENIC DESIGNER FOR THE SHOW - GUYS & DOLLS<br />
TYPE OF PROGRAM: RESIDENCY<br />
DISTRICT/ SCHOOL: KATONAH/LEWISBORO/JOHN JAY HIGH SCHOOL<br />
# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />
# OF STUDENTS: 50 GRADE(S) 9-12<br />
DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 3/2-22/12<br />
NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />
STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 X STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />
ARTIST: JULIE PAGET<br />
CONTRACT #: A8037<br />
TITLE OF PROGRAM: SPANISH ART, CULTURE & LANGUAGE<br />
TYPE OF PROGRAM: WORKSHOP<br />
DISTRICT/ SCHOOL:<br />
# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />
CHAPPAQUA/GRAFFLIN ELEM.<br />
# OF STUDENTS: 8 GRADE(S) K & 1<br />
DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 1/11-3/21/12<br />
NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />
STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 X STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4 X<br />
1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />
1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />
1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />
2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />
3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />
4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />
5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />
6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />
2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />
3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />
4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />
5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />
6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM?<br />
NONE<br />
Y<br />
WHY?<br />
7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y<br />
EXCELLENT AND ENGAGING. STUDENTS LOVED JULIE.<br />
WHY?<br />
8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />
NONE<br />
9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />
NONE<br />
8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />
NONE<br />
9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />
NONE<br />
ARTIST: KAORO ISHIBASHI<br />
CONTRACT #: A7915<br />
TITLE OF PROGRAM: VIOLINIST SHOW<br />
TYPE OF PROGRAM: ASSEMBLY<br />
DISTRICT/ SCHOOL:<br />
# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />
HASTINGS/ALL SCHOOLS<br />
# OF STUDENTS: 150 GRADE(S) 3-12<br />
DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 11/7/11<br />
NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />
STANDARD 1 STANDARD 2 STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />
ARTIST: KAREN COLIN<br />
CONTRACT #: A8778<br />
TITLE OF PROGRAM: MODERN HARP PERFORMANCE<br />
TYPE OF PROGRAM: ASSEMBLY<br />
DISTRICT/ SCHOOL: NEW ROCHELLE/NEW ROCHELLE HS<br />
# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />
# OF STUDENTS: 310 GRADE(S) 9-12<br />
DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 5/3/12<br />
NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />
STANDARD 1 STANDARD 2 STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />
1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />
1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />
1.<br />
2.<br />
3.<br />
4.<br />
5.<br />
6.<br />
STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />
ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />
EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />
ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />
TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />
QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />
4<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />
K DEMONSTRATED A DIFFERENT WAY TO PLAY THE VIOLIN AND<br />
EXPOSED THE STUDENTS TO SOMETHING THEY MIGHT NOT HAVE<br />
EXPERIENCED.<br />
8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />
A LITTLE MORE STRUCTURE.<br />
9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />
THIS WAS A GREAT OPPORTUNITY.<br />
1.<br />
2.<br />
3.<br />
4.<br />
5.<br />
6.<br />
STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />
ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />
EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />
ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />
TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />
QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
N/<br />
7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />
PERFORMER ENGAGED THE AUDIENCE. PERFORMANCE WAS HIGH<br />
QUALITY.<br />
8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />
LESS HISTORY BACKGROUND AND MORE PERFORMANCE.<br />
9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />
NONE<br />
Arts in Education Service - School Evaluations <strong>2011</strong>-<strong>2012</strong><br />
Page 167 of 332
ARTIST: KAREN DE MAURO<br />
CONTRACT #: A8316<br />
TITLE OF PROGRAM: INTERACTIVE STORY JOURNEYS - EGYPTIAN MYTHS<br />
TYPE OF PROGRAM: WORKSHOP<br />
DISTRICT/ SCHOOL: KATONAH/LEWISBORO/JOHN JAY MIDDLE SCHOOL<br />
# OF TEACHERS: 2<br />
# OF STUDENTS: 104 GRADE(S) 6<br />
DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 2/28-3/1/12<br />
NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />
STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />
ARTIST: KAREN FREOHLICH<br />
CONTRACT #: A8578<br />
TITLE OF PROGRAM: FRENCH HORN PLAYER FOR THE SHOW - SUGAR<br />
TYPE OF PROGRAM: ASSEMBLY<br />
DISTRICT/ SCHOOL: BRIARCLIFF/BRIARCLIFF HIGH SCHOOL<br />
# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />
# OF STUDENTS: 70 GRADE(S) 9-12<br />
DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 3/4-11/12<br />
NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />
STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 STANDARD 3 STANDARD 4<br />
1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />
1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />
1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />
2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />
3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />
4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />
5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />
6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />
2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />
3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />
4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />
5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />
6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />
KAREN'S KNOWLEDGE OF ANCIENT GREECE, AS WELL AS HER<br />
ABILITY TO ENGAGE 6TH GRADERS, SERVES AS A GREAT<br />
SUPPLEMENT TO OUR STUDY OF GREECE.<br />
8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />
NONE<br />
9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />
WE HAVE BEEN WORKING WITH KAREN FOR 7 YEARS NOW. WE<br />
LOVE HOW SHE MOTIVATES OUR STUDENTS.<br />
7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />
THE INTERACTION BETWEEN STUDENTS AND PROFESSIONAL<br />
MUSICIAN WAS INVALUABLE.<br />
8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />
NONE<br />
9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />
NONE<br />
ARTIST: KAREN JACQUES<br />
CONTRACT #: A7717<br />
TITLE OF PROGRAM: TROMBONE PLAYER FOR THE SHOW - ANNIE GET<br />
YOUR GUN<br />
TYPE OF PROGRAM: ASSEMBLY<br />
DISTRICT/ SCHOOL: LAKELAND/WALTER PANAS HIGH SCHOOL<br />
# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />
# OF STUDENTS: 100 GRADE(S) 9-12<br />
DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 11/14-19/11<br />
NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />
STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />
1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />
ARTIST: KAREN JACQUES<br />
CONTRACT #: A8333<br />
TITLE OF PROGRAM: TROMBONE PLAYER FOR THE SHOW - MY FAIR LADY<br />
TYPE OF PROGRAM: ASSEMBLY<br />
DISTRICT/ SCHOOL: LAKELAND/WALTER PANAS HIGH SCHOOL<br />
# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />
# OF STUDENTS: 200 GRADE(S) 9-12<br />
DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 4/30-5/5/12<br />
NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />
STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />
1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />
1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />
2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />
3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />
4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />
5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />
6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />
7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />
GREAT WORKING WITH KAREN.<br />
8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />
NONE<br />
9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />
NONE<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />
2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />
3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />
4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />
5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />
6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />
7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />
NONE<br />
8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />
NONE<br />
9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />
NONE<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
Arts in Education Service - School Evaluations <strong>2011</strong>-<strong>2012</strong><br />
Page 168 of 332
ARTIST:<br />
KAREN KAUFMAN ORLOFF<br />
TITLE OF PROGRAM: AUTHOR VISIT<br />
TYPE OF PROGRAM: ASSEMBLY<br />
DISTRICT/ SCHOOL:<br />
BREWSTER/GARDEN STREET ELEM.<br />
CONTRACT #: A8633<br />
# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />
# OF STUDENTS: GRADE(S) K & 1<br />
DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE<br />
3/16/12<br />
NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />
STANDARD 1 STANDARD 2 STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />
1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />
1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />
2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />
3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />
4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />
5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />
6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />
7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />
THE STUDENTS LOVED HER. HER BOOKS WERE PERFECT.<br />
8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />
POSSIBLY PUTTING TOGETHER A POWERPOINT WOULD BE EASIER<br />
TO SHARE PICTURES AND BOOKS.<br />
9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />
WONDERFUL VISIT.<br />
ARTIST: KAREN ROSENTHAL-TELLER<br />
TITLE OF PROGRAM: ART & CULTURE OF YOGA<br />
TYPE OF PROGRAM: WORKSHOP<br />
DISTRICT/ SCHOOL:<br />
PELHAM/SIWANOY ELEM.<br />
CONTRACT #: A8363<br />
# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />
# OF STUDENTS: 12 GRADE(S) 3-5<br />
DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE<br />
2/3-3/29/12<br />
NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />
STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 X STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4 X<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
ARTIST:<br />
KAREN LONGWELL<br />
CONTRACT #: A7721<br />
TITLE OF PROGRAM: VOCAL COACH FOR THE SHOW - ANNIE GET YOUR<br />
GUN<br />
TYPE OF PROGRAM: RESIDENCY<br />
DISTRICT/ SCHOOL:<br />
LAKELAND/WALTER PANAS HIGH SCHOOL<br />
# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />
# OF STUDENTS: 100 GRADE(S) 9-12<br />
DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE<br />
9/26-11/19/11<br />
NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />
STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 X STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />
1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />
1.<br />
2.<br />
3.<br />
4.<br />
5.<br />
6.<br />
STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />
ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />
EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />
ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />
TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />
QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />
KAREN REALLY KNOWS HOW TO BRING OUT THE BEST OF ALL THE<br />
STUDENTS.<br />
8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />
NONE<br />
9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />
ARTIST:<br />
NONE<br />
KAREN ROSENTHAL-TELLER<br />
TITLE OF PROGRAM: ART & CULTURE OF YOGA<br />
TYPE OF PROGRAM: WORKSHOP<br />
DISTRICT/ SCHOOL:<br />
PELHAM/SIWANOY ELEM.<br />
CONTRACT #: A7645<br />
# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />
# OF STUDENTS: 10 GRADE(S) 3-5<br />
DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE<br />
10/7-12/9/11<br />
NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />
STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 X STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4 X<br />
1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />
1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />
1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />
2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />
3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />
4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />
5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />
6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />
5<br />
5<br />
4<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />
2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />
3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />
4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />
5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />
6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM?<br />
NONE<br />
Y<br />
WHY?<br />
7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM?<br />
NONE<br />
Y<br />
WHY?<br />
8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />
NONE<br />
9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />
NONE<br />
8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />
NONE<br />
9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />
NONE<br />
Arts in Education Service - School Evaluations <strong>2011</strong>-<strong>2012</strong><br />
Page 169 of 332
ARTIST:<br />
KAREN SEVELL GREENBAUM<br />
CONTRACT #: A7594C<br />
TITLE OF PROGRAM: EXPERIENTIAL LEARNING THROUGH THE ARTS: THE<br />
OTHER SIDE OF THE MIRROR: WHILE I WAS<br />
DREAMING<br />
TYPE OF PROGRAM: RESIDENCY<br />
DISTRICT/ SCHOOL:<br />
HAWTHORNE CEDAR KNOLLS/JR. & SENIOR HIGH SC<br />
# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />
# OF STUDENTS: 10 GRADE(S) 7-12<br />
DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE<br />
12/14/11-2/1/12<br />
NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />
STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />
ARTIST:<br />
KAREN SEVELL GREENBAUM<br />
CONTRACT #: A7594B<br />
TITLE OF PROGRAM: EXPERIENTIAL LEARNING THROUGH THE ARTS: THE<br />
OTHER SIDE OF THE MIRROR: WHILE I WAS<br />
DREAMING<br />
TYPE OF PROGRAM: RESIDENCY<br />
DISTRICT/ SCHOOL:<br />
HAWTHORNE CEDAR KNOLLS/JR. & SENIOR HIGH SC<br />
# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />
# OF STUDENTS: 12 GRADE(S) 7-12<br />
DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 11/10-12/8/11<br />
NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />
STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />
1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />
1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />
1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />
2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />
3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />
4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />
5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />
6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
4<br />
1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />
2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />
3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />
4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />
5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />
6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y<br />
IT HAS BEEN A GREAT ASSET TO OUR COMMUNITY.<br />
WHY?<br />
7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y<br />
LESSONS ARE WELL THOUGHT OUT AND ENGAGING.<br />
WHY?<br />
8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />
NONE<br />
9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />
NONE<br />
8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />
NONE<br />
9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />
NONE<br />
ARTIST: KAREN SEVELL GREENBAUM<br />
CONTRACT #: A7594D<br />
TITLE OF PROGRAM: EXPERIENTIAL LEARNING THROUGH THE ARTS: THE<br />
OTHER SIDE OF THE MIRROR: WHILE I WAS<br />
DREAMING<br />
TYPE OF PROGRAM: RESIDENCY<br />
DISTRICT/ SCHOOL:<br />
HAWTHORNE CEDAR KNOLLS/JR. & SENIOR HIGH SC<br />
# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />
# OF STUDENTS: 80 GRADE(S) 7-12<br />
DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE<br />
2/2-3/1/12<br />
NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />
STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />
ARTIST:<br />
KAREN SEVELL GREENBAUM<br />
CONTRACT #: A7594A<br />
TITLE OF PROGRAM: EXPERIENTIAL LEARNING THROUGH THE ARTS: THE<br />
OTHER SIDE OF THE MIRROR: WHILE I WAS<br />
DREAMING<br />
TYPE OF PROGRAM: RESIDENCY<br />
DISTRICT/ SCHOOL:<br />
HAWTHORNE CEDAR KNOLLS/JR. & SENIOR HIGH SC<br />
# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />
# OF STUDENTS: 101 GRADE(S) 7-12<br />
DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE<br />
10/26, 27, 11/2, 3 & 9/11<br />
NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />
STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />
1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />
1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />
1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />
2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />
3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />
4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />
5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />
6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />
7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />
THIS WAS A GREAT OUTLET FOR THE STUDENTS.<br />
8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />
NONE<br />
9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />
NONE<br />
4<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
1.<br />
2.<br />
3.<br />
4.<br />
5.<br />
6.<br />
STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />
ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />
EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />
ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />
TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />
QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />
THIS HAS BEEN A GREAT OPPORTUNITY FOR THE YOUNG LADIES.<br />
IT IS A GREAT OUTLET.<br />
8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />
NONE<br />
9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />
NONE<br />
Arts in Education Service - School Evaluations <strong>2011</strong>-<strong>2012</strong><br />
Page 170 of 332
ARTIST: KAREN ZAMBELLI<br />
CONTRACT #: A8022<br />
TITLE OF PROGRAM: JAZZ & TAP DANCING FOR JAZZ CO<br />
TYPE OF PROGRAM: WORKSHOP<br />
DISTRICT/ SCHOOL: TUCKAHOE/TUCKAHOE HIGH SCHOOL<br />
# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />
# OF STUDENTS: 60 GRADE(S) 9-12<br />
DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 11/28/11-3/3/12<br />
NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />
STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 X STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4 X<br />
ARTIST: KAREN ZAMBELLI<br />
CONTRACT #: A7858A<br />
TITLE OF PROGRAM: TAP & JAZZ DANCING<br />
TYPE OF PROGRAM: RESIDENCY<br />
DISTRICT/ SCHOOL: EASTCHESTER/EASTCHESTER HIGH SCHOOL<br />
# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />
# OF STUDENTS: 30 GRADE(S) 9-12<br />
DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 10/31/11-1/23/12<br />
NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />
STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 X STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4 X<br />
1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />
1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />
1.<br />
2.<br />
3.<br />
4.<br />
5.<br />
6.<br />
STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />
ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />
EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />
ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />
TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />
QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
N/<br />
7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />
DANCE IS CULTURAL, ARTISTIC, EDUCATIONAL ACTIVE AND FUN.<br />
8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />
NONE.<br />
9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />
TALENTED, ORGANIZED AND GREAT PERSON.<br />
1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />
2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />
3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />
4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />
5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />
6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />
7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />
NONE<br />
8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />
NONE<br />
9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />
KAREN BRINGS HER EXPERTISE TO THE PROGRAM WHICH<br />
HEIGHTENS THE QUALITY OF OUR CONTENT. SHE IS TRULY<br />
AMAZING.<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
ARTIST: KAREN ZAMBELLI<br />
CONTRACT #: A7858B<br />
TITLE OF PROGRAM: THEATRE DANCES<br />
TYPE OF PROGRAM: RESIDENCY<br />
DISTRICT/ SCHOOL: EASTCHESTER/EASTCHESTER HIGH SCHOOL<br />
# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />
# OF STUDENTS: 30 GRADE(S) 9-12<br />
DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 11/1/11-1/17/12<br />
NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />
STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 X STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />
ARTIST: KARIN REETZ<br />
CONTRACT #: A8794<br />
TITLE OF PROGRAM: LETS MAKE BOOKS<br />
TYPE OF PROGRAM: WORKSHOP<br />
DISTRICT/ SCHOOL: NEW ROCHELLE/TRINITY ELEM. SCHOOL<br />
# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />
# OF STUDENTS: 175 GRADE(S) 5<br />
DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 5/30-6/14/12<br />
NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />
STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 X STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />
1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />
1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />
1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />
2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />
3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />
4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />
5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />
6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />
2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />
3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />
4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />
5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />
6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
N/<br />
7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM?<br />
NONE<br />
Y<br />
WHY?<br />
7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM?<br />
KARIN IS ORGANIZED AND KNOWLEDGEABLE.<br />
Y<br />
WHY?<br />
8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />
NONE<br />
9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />
KAREN BRINGS HER EXPERTISE TO THE PROGRAM WHICH<br />
HEIGHTENS THE QUALITY OF OUR CONTENT. SHE IS TRULY<br />
AMAZING.<br />
8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />
NONE<br />
9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />
NONE<br />
Arts in Education Service - School Evaluations <strong>2011</strong>-<strong>2012</strong><br />
Page 171 of 332
ARTIST: KARNE LONGWELL<br />
CONTRACT #: A8320<br />
TITLE OF PROGRAM: VOCAL COACH FOR THE SHOW - MY FAIR LADY<br />
TYPE OF PROGRAM: RESIDENCY<br />
DISTRICT/ SCHOOL: LAKELAND/WALTER PANAS HIGH SCHOOL<br />
# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />
# OF STUDENTS: 200 GRADE(S) 9-12<br />
DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 2/21-5/5/12<br />
NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />
STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 X STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />
1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />
ARTIST: KATE DeMAGISTRIS CONTRACT #: A-7988<br />
TITLE OF PROGRAM: KEYBOARD PLAYER FOR THE SHOW - THE DROWSY<br />
CHAPERONE<br />
TYPE OF PROGRAM: ASSEMBLY<br />
DISTRICT/ SCHOOL: CHAPPAQUA/HORACE GREELEY HIGH SCHOOL<br />
# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />
# OF STUDENTS: 35 GRADE(S) 9-12<br />
DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 11/17-19/11<br />
NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />
STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />
1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />
1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />
2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />
3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />
4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />
5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />
6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />
7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />
NONE<br />
8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />
NONE<br />
9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />
NONE<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />
2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />
3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />
4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />
5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />
6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />
7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />
EXCELLENT, FLAWLESS SHOW AND MUSICAL DIRECTION. KATE<br />
WAS A GREAT ADDITION TO OUR ORCHESTRA.<br />
8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />
NONE<br />
9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />
COULDN'T BE MORE PROFESSIONAL. VERY IMPRESSIVE THEATER<br />
PROGRAM.<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
ARTIST: KATE VANTUCCI<br />
CONTRACT #: A8687<br />
TITLE OF PROGRAM: ART & CULTURE OF YOGA<br />
TYPE OF PROGRAM: RESIDENCY<br />
DISTRICT/ SCHOOL: NEW ROCHELLE/TRINITY ELEM. SCHOOL<br />
# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />
# OF STUDENTS: 150 GRADE(S) 2<br />
DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 4/2-5/4/12<br />
NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />
STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 X STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4 X<br />
1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />
ARTIST: KATHI ANNE APPELT<br />
CONTRACT #: A7828<br />
TITLE OF PROGRAM: AUTHOR VISIT - BATS IN MY BELFRY OR HOW A<br />
BOOK COMES TO BE<br />
TYPE OF PROGRAM: ASSEMBLY<br />
DISTRICT/ SCHOOL:<br />
# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />
BRIARCLIFF/TODD ELEM.<br />
# OF STUDENTS: 310 GRADE(S) K-2<br />
DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 10/27/11<br />
NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />
STANDARD 1 STANDARD 2 STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />
1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />
1.<br />
2.<br />
3.<br />
4.<br />
5.<br />
6.<br />
STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />
ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />
EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />
ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />
TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />
QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
N/<br />
7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />
KATE WAS WELL ORGANIZED, ENERGETIC AND KNOWLEDGEABLE.<br />
8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />
NONE<br />
9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />
NONE<br />
1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />
2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />
3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />
4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />
5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />
6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />
7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />
KATHI DOES AN GREAT JOB TALKING ABOUT WRITING, GIVING<br />
WRITING TIPS AND INSPIRING STUDENTS TO WRITE.<br />
8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />
NONE<br />
9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />
WE ARE GLAD SHE COME TO OUR SCHOOL.<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
Arts in Education Service - School Evaluations <strong>2011</strong>-<strong>2012</strong><br />
Page 172 of 332
ARTIST: KATHLEEN BART<br />
CONTRACT #: A8325<br />
TITLE OF PROGRAM: AUTHOR VISIT - GLOBAL CULTURES<br />
TYPE OF PROGRAM: ASSEMBLY<br />
DISTRICT/ SCHOOL: EASTCHESTER/ANNE HUTCHINSON ELEM.<br />
# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />
# OF STUDENTS: 125 GRADE(S) 3<br />
DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 1/23/12<br />
NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />
STANDARD 1 STANDARD 2 STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4 X<br />
ARTIST: KATHLEEN BART<br />
CONTRACT #: A7564B<br />
TITLE OF PROGRAM: AUTHOR VISIT - GLOBAL CULTURES<br />
TYPE OF PROGRAM: ASSEMBLY<br />
DISTRICT/ SCHOOL: EASTCHESTER/GREENVALE ELEM.<br />
# OF TEACHERS: 6<br />
# OF STUDENTS: 141 GRADE(S) 3<br />
DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 4/3/12<br />
NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />
STANDARD 1 STANDARD 2 STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4 X<br />
1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />
1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />
1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />
2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />
3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />
4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />
5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />
6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />
2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />
3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />
4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />
5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />
6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />
KATHLEEN IS VERY ENGAGING AND SPARKED A GENUINE<br />
INTEREST IN A VARIETY OF WORLD CULTURES.<br />
8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />
WE WOULD LOVE TO HAVE THE GLOBAL CULTURES ASSEMBLY<br />
FOLLOWED UP WITH A RELATED WRITER'S WORKSHOP.<br />
9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />
NONE<br />
7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />
MS. BART KEPT THE CHILDREN'S INTEREST THROUGHOUT THE<br />
PROGRAM AND WAS ABLE TO COMMUNICATE DIFFERENT<br />
CULTURES IN AN EFFECTIVE MANNER. THE STUDENTS AND<br />
TEACHERS THROUGHLY ENJOYED HER PRESENTATION.<br />
8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />
NONE<br />
9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />
NONE<br />
ARTIST: KATHLEEN BART<br />
CONTRACT #: A7564A<br />
TITLE OF PROGRAM: AUTHOR VISIT - TEDDY BEAR WRITER'S WORKSHOPS<br />
TYPE OF PROGRAM: RESIDENCY<br />
DISTRICT/ SCHOOL: EASTCHESTER/GREENVALE ELEM.<br />
# OF TEACHERS: 3<br />
# OF STUDENTS: 152 GRADE(S) 2<br />
DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 10/27 & 28/11<br />
NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />
STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 X STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />
ARTIST: KATHLEEN BART<br />
CONTRACT #: A8733<br />
TITLE OF PROGRAM: AUTHOR VISIT - TEDDY BEAR WRITING & DRAWING<br />
TYPE OF PROGRAM: ASSEMBLY/WORKSHOP<br />
DISTRICT/ SCHOOL: EASTCHESTER/ANNE HUTCHINSON ELEM.<br />
# OF TEACHERS: 5<br />
# OF STUDENTS: 24 GRADE(S) 2<br />
DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 3/26 & 27/12<br />
NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />
STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 X STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />
1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />
1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />
1.<br />
2.<br />
3.<br />
4.<br />
5.<br />
6.<br />
STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />
ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />
EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />
ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />
TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />
QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />
EXCELLENT PROGRAM. SHE WAS INTERACTIVE WITH CHILDREN.<br />
GOOD VISUALS. GREAT SOUND SYSTEM.<br />
8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />
NONE<br />
9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />
NONE<br />
1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />
2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />
3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />
4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />
5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />
6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />
7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />
NONE<br />
8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />
NONE<br />
9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />
NONE<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
Arts in Education Service - School Evaluations <strong>2011</strong>-<strong>2012</strong><br />
Page 173 of 332
ARTIST: KATHLEEN FAY<br />
CONTRACT #: A8759<br />
TITLE OF PROGRAM: SCULPEY & MOSAICS<br />
TYPE OF PROGRAM: WORKSHOP<br />
DISTRICT/ SCHOOL: KATONAH/LEWISBORO/LEWISBORO ELEM.<br />
# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />
# OF STUDENTS: 12 GRADE(S) 3-5<br />
DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 4/25-5/30/12<br />
NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />
STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 X STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />
ARTIST: KATHLEEN FAY<br />
CONTRACT #: A8298<br />
TITLE OF PROGRAM: SET DESIGNER FOR THE SHOW<br />
TYPE OF PROGRAM: RESIDENCY<br />
DISTRICT/ SCHOOL: KATONAH/LEWISBORO/LEWISBORO ELEM.<br />
# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />
# OF STUDENTS: GRADE(S) 4 & 5<br />
DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 1/19-3/29/12<br />
NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />
STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 X STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />
1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />
1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />
1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />
2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />
3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />
4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />
5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />
6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />
2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />
3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />
4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />
5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />
6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />
VERY CREATIVE AND CHILDREN ALL SEEMED TO ENJOY IT.<br />
8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />
NONE<br />
9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />
NONE<br />
7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />
KATHLEEN WAS VERY COMMITTED TO CREATE AN ATTRACTIVE<br />
SET AND INVOLVED THE STUDENTS AS MUCH AS SHE COULD.<br />
8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />
PLAN AHEAD WHICH I KNOW IS HARD TO DO.<br />
9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />
IT LOOKED GREAT AND THE CHILDREN OUTDID THEMSELVES<br />
AGAIN.<br />
ARTIST: KATHLEEN MAHAN<br />
CONTRACT #: A8545<br />
TITLE OF PROGRAM: WRITING AND PERFORMING STAGE TO PAGE<br />
SCHOOL MEMORIES SHOW<br />
TYPE OF PROGRAM: RESIDENCY<br />
DISTRICT/ SCHOOL:<br />
# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />
PELHAM/PROSPECT HILL ELEM.<br />
# OF STUDENTS: 58 GRADE(S) 5<br />
DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 4/2-6/5/12<br />
NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />
STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 X STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />
ARTIST: KATHLEEN MAHAN<br />
CONTRACT #: A8868<br />
TITLE OF PROGRAM: WRITING AND PERFORMING STAGE TO PAGE<br />
SCHOOL MEMORIES SHOW<br />
TYPE OF PROGRAM: RESIDENCY<br />
DISTRICT/ SCHOOL:<br />
# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />
PELHAM/SIWANOY ELEM.<br />
# OF STUDENTS: 40 GRADE(S) 5<br />
DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 5/21-6/12/12<br />
NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />
STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 X STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />
1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />
1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />
1.<br />
2.<br />
3.<br />
4.<br />
5.<br />
6.<br />
STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />
ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />
EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />
ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />
TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />
QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />
KATHLEEN IS VERY TALENTED. SHE WORKS WONDERFULLY WITH<br />
THE CHILDREN AND WROTE UP A SCRIPT THAT WAS EXCEPTIONAL.<br />
8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />
WE WERE VERY SATISFIED.<br />
9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />
I CAN'T WAIT UNTIL NEXT YEAR.<br />
1.<br />
2.<br />
3.<br />
4.<br />
5.<br />
6.<br />
STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />
ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />
EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />
ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />
TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />
QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
4<br />
N/<br />
7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />
THE STUDENTS WERE ENGAGED, ABLE TO EXPRESS THEIR IDEAS<br />
THROUGH THE ARTS AND LEARNED ABOUT THEATRE.<br />
8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />
NONE<br />
9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />
NONE<br />
Arts in Education Service - School Evaluations <strong>2011</strong>-<strong>2012</strong><br />
Page 174 of 332
ARTIST: KATHLEEN NESI<br />
CONTRACT #: A8056<br />
TITLE OF PROGRAM: MAKING ARTIST TRADING CARDS<br />
TYPE OF PROGRAM: WORKSHOP<br />
DISTRICT/ SCHOOL:<br />
# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />
PELHAM/PROSPECT HILL ELEM.<br />
# OF STUDENTS: 11 GRADE(S) 3-5<br />
DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 1/11-3/7/12<br />
NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />
STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 X STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />
ARTIST: KATHLEEN SARTOR dba SIRIUS COYOT CONTRACT #: A8487<br />
TITLE OF PROGRAM: INTERACTIVE CONCERT<br />
TYPE OF PROGRAM: ASSEMBLY<br />
DISTRICT/ SCHOOL: IRVINGTON/MAIN STREET SCHOOL<br />
# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />
# OF STUDENTS: 120 GRADE(S) 5<br />
DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 3/16/12<br />
NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />
STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4 X<br />
1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />
1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />
1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />
2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />
3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />
4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />
5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />
6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
N/<br />
1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />
2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />
3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />
4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />
5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />
6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM?<br />
NONE<br />
Y<br />
WHY?<br />
7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />
STUDENTS WERE ENGAGED DURING THE ENTIRE ASSEMBLY.<br />
8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />
NONE<br />
9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />
NONE<br />
8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />
NONE<br />
9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />
NONE<br />
ARTIST: KATHLEEN SARTOR dba SIRIUS COYOT CONTRACT #: A8214<br />
TITLE OF PROGRAM: ROOTS OF LATIN AMERICAN MUSIC & CULTURE<br />
TYPE OF PROGRAM: ASSEMBLY<br />
DISTRICT/ SCHOOL: PUTNAM VALLEY/PUTNAM VALLEY MIDDLE SCHOOL<br />
# OF TEACHERS: 3<br />
# OF STUDENTS: 150 GRADE(S) 5<br />
DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 5/8/12<br />
NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />
STANDARD 1 STANDARD 2 STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4 X<br />
ARTIST: KATONAH ART CENTER<br />
CONTRACT #: A8115C<br />
TITLE OF PROGRAM: ARLENE ESTEVEZ - ANIMAL CRAFTS<br />
TYPE OF PROGRAM: WORKSHOP<br />
DISTRICT/ SCHOOL: CHAPPAQUA/WESTORCHARD ELEM.<br />
# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />
# OF STUDENTS: 9 GRADE(S) K-2<br />
DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 1/12-3/8/12<br />
NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />
STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 X STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />
1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />
1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />
1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />
2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />
3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />
4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />
5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />
6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
N/<br />
1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />
2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />
3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />
4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />
5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />
6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
N/<br />
5<br />
7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />
THIS FITS IN PERFECTLY WITH OUR CURRICULUM. STUDENTS<br />
WERE ENGAGED 100% OF THE TIME.<br />
8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />
NONE<br />
9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />
NONE<br />
7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM?<br />
NONE<br />
8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />
NONE<br />
9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />
NONE<br />
Y<br />
WHY?<br />
Arts in Education Service - School Evaluations <strong>2011</strong>-<strong>2012</strong><br />
Page 175 of 332
ARTIST: KATONAH ART CENTER<br />
CONTRACT #: A8202<br />
TITLE OF PROGRAM: CHARLENE ANDERSEN - JEWELRY MAKING<br />
TYPE OF PROGRAM: WORKSHOP<br />
DISTRICT/ SCHOOL: CHAPPAQUA/ROARING BROOK ELEM.<br />
# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />
# OF STUDENTS: 10 GRADE(S) 3 & 4<br />
DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 1/13-3/9/12<br />
NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />
STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 X STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />
ARTIST: KATONAH ART CENTER<br />
CONTRACT #: A8116<br />
TITLE OF PROGRAM: CHARLENE ANDERSON - CAMP ARTS & CRAFTS<br />
TYPE OF PROGRAM: WORKSHOP<br />
DISTRICT/ SCHOOL:<br />
# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />
CHAPPAQUA/GRAFFLIN ELEM.<br />
# OF STUDENTS: 7 GRADE(S) K-2<br />
DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 1/12-3/8/12<br />
NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />
STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 X STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />
1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />
1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />
1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />
2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />
3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />
4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />
5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />
6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
N/<br />
1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />
2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />
3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />
4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />
5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />
6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />
3<br />
3<br />
3<br />
3<br />
3<br />
3<br />
7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y<br />
STUDENTS WERE VERY PLEASE WITH THE CLASS.<br />
WHY?<br />
7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM?<br />
NONE<br />
Y<br />
WHY?<br />
8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />
NONE<br />
9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />
WE MAY MAKE THE CLASS SMALLER NEXT YEAR.<br />
8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />
NONE<br />
9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />
NONE<br />
ARTIST: KATONAH ART CENTER<br />
CONTRACT #: A8116<br />
TITLE OF PROGRAM: CHARLENE ANDERSON - INTRO TO SEWING<br />
TYPE OF PROGRAM: WORKSHOP<br />
DISTRICT/ SCHOOL:<br />
# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />
CHAPPAQUA/GRAFFLIN ELEM.<br />
# OF STUDENTS: 11 GRADE(S) 2-4<br />
DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 1/11-3/21/12<br />
NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />
STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 X STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />
ARTIST: KATONAH ART CENTER<br />
CONTRACT #: A7507<br />
TITLE OF PROGRAM: CHARLENE ANDERSON - JEWELRY MAKING<br />
TYPE OF PROGRAM: WORKSHOP<br />
DISTRICT/ SCHOOL: KATONAH/LEWISBORO/INCREASE MILLER ELEM.<br />
# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />
# OF STUDENTS: 7 GRADE(S) 1-3<br />
DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 10/5-12/7/12<br />
NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />
STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 X STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />
1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />
1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />
1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />
2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />
3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />
4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />
5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />
6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />
4<br />
4<br />
3<br />
2<br />
3<br />
3<br />
1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />
2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />
3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />
4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />
5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />
6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
N/<br />
N/<br />
7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM?<br />
NONE<br />
8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />
FEWER STUDENTS IN CLASS. CONSIDER AN ASSISTANT.<br />
9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />
NONE<br />
Y<br />
WHY?<br />
7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />
AS ALWAYS, CHARLENE IS A DELIGHT. THE STUDENTS LOVE<br />
LEARNING FROM HER.<br />
8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />
NONE<br />
9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />
NONE<br />
Arts in Education Service - School Evaluations <strong>2011</strong>-<strong>2012</strong><br />
Page 176 of 332
ARTIST: KATONAH ART CENTER<br />
CONTRACT #: A7729A<br />
TITLE OF PROGRAM: CHARLENE ANDERSON - WIZARD CRAFTS<br />
TYPE OF PROGRAM: WORKSHOP<br />
DISTRICT/ SCHOOL: KATONAH/LEWISBORO/LEWISBORO ELEM.<br />
# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />
# OF STUDENTS: GRADE(S) 3-5<br />
DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 10/17-12/5/11<br />
NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />
STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 X STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />
ARTIST: KATONAH ART CENTER<br />
CONTRACT #: A8116<br />
TITLE OF PROGRAM: DONNA FERREIRO - JEWELRY MAKING<br />
TYPE OF PROGRAM: WORKSHOP<br />
DISTRICT/ SCHOOL:<br />
# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />
CHAPPAQUA/GRAFFLIN ELEM.<br />
# OF STUDENTS: 11 GRADE(S) K-2<br />
DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 1/10-3/6/12<br />
NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />
STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 X STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />
1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />
1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />
1.<br />
2.<br />
3.<br />
4.<br />
5.<br />
6.<br />
STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />
ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />
EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />
ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />
TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />
QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />
4<br />
4<br />
4<br />
4<br />
4<br />
5<br />
7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />
THE CHILDREN SEEM TO HAVE FUN AND COME HOME WITH GREAT<br />
THINGS EVERY WEEK.<br />
8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />
NONE<br />
9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />
NONE<br />
1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />
2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />
3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />
4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />
5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />
6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />
7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />
NONE<br />
8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />
NONE<br />
9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />
NONE<br />
3<br />
3<br />
3<br />
3<br />
3<br />
3<br />
ARTIST: KATONAH ART CENTER<br />
CONTRACT #: A8116<br />
TITLE OF PROGRAM: FRANCHE CARLSON - FAIRY WORLD CRAFTS<br />
TYPE OF PROGRAM: WORKSHOP<br />
DISTRICT/ SCHOOL:<br />
# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />
CHAPPAQUA/GRAFFLIN ELEM.<br />
# OF STUDENTS: 11 GRADE(S) K-2<br />
DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 1/9-3/12/12<br />
NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />
STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 X STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />
ARTIST: KATONAH ART CENTER<br />
CONTRACT #: A8202<br />
TITLE OF PROGRAM: FRANCHE CARLSON - SEWING<br />
TYPE OF PROGRAM: WORKSHOP<br />
DISTRICT/ SCHOOL: CHAPPAQUA/ROARING BROOK ELEM.<br />
# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />
# OF STUDENTS: 10 GRADE(S) 2-4<br />
DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 1/11-2/29/12<br />
NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />
STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 X STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />
1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />
1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />
1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />
2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />
3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />
4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />
5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />
6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />
3<br />
3<br />
3<br />
3<br />
3<br />
3<br />
1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />
2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />
3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />
4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />
5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />
6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />
4<br />
4<br />
5<br />
4<br />
4<br />
N/<br />
7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM?<br />
NONE<br />
Y<br />
WHY?<br />
7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM?<br />
TALENTED INSTRUCTOR.<br />
Y<br />
WHY?<br />
8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />
NONE<br />
9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />
NONE<br />
8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />
NONE<br />
9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />
NONE<br />
Arts in Education Service - School Evaluations <strong>2011</strong>-<strong>2012</strong><br />
Page 177 of 332
ARTIST: KATONAH ART CENTER<br />
CONTRACT #: A8116<br />
TITLE OF PROGRAM: JANICE NOTO HELMERS - SCRAPBOOKING<br />
TYPE OF PROGRAM: WORKSHOP<br />
DISTRICT/ SCHOOL:<br />
# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />
CHAPPAQUA/GRAFFLIN ELEM.<br />
# OF STUDENTS: 9 GRADE(S) 2-4<br />
DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 1/12-3/8/12<br />
NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />
STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 X STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />
ARTIST: KATONAH ART CENTER<br />
CONTRACT #: A7589<br />
TITLE OF PROGRAM: JENNY CRAIG - MOSAICS<br />
TYPE OF PROGRAM: WORKSHOP<br />
DISTRICT/ SCHOOL: KATONAH/LEWISBORO/KATONAH ELEM. SCHOOL<br />
# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />
# OF STUDENTS: 8 GRADE(S) 1-4<br />
DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 10/6-12/1/11<br />
NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />
STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 X STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />
1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />
1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />
1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />
2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />
3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />
4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />
5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />
6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />
4<br />
4<br />
4<br />
4<br />
3<br />
4<br />
1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />
2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />
3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />
4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />
5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />
6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />
4<br />
4<br />
4<br />
4<br />
4<br />
4<br />
7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM?<br />
NONE<br />
Y<br />
WHY?<br />
7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM?<br />
NONE<br />
Y<br />
WHY?<br />
8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />
NONE<br />
9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />
NONE<br />
8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />
NONE<br />
9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />
NONE<br />
ARTIST: KATONAH ART CENTER<br />
CONTRACT #: A8115B<br />
TITLE OF PROGRAM: JULIA ZAREMBA - ARTS & CRAFTS<br />
TYPE OF PROGRAM: WORKSHOP<br />
DISTRICT/ SCHOOL: CHAPPAQUA/WESTORCHARD ELEM.<br />
# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />
# OF STUDENTS: 11 GRADE(S) K-2<br />
DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 1/11-3/8/12<br />
NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />
STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 X STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />
ARTIST: KATONAH ART CENTER<br />
CONTRACT #: A8116<br />
TITLE OF PROGRAM: KATHERINE HURTZDO - ANIMAL ARTS & CRAFTS<br />
TYPE OF PROGRAM: WORKSHOP<br />
DISTRICT/ SCHOOL:<br />
# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />
CHAPPAQUA/GRAFFLIN ELEM.<br />
# OF STUDENTS: 7 GRADE(S) 3 & 4<br />
DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 1/13-3/9/12<br />
NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />
STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 X STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />
1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />
1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />
1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />
2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />
3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />
4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />
5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />
6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />
2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />
3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />
4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />
5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />
6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />
3<br />
3<br />
3<br />
3<br />
3<br />
3<br />
7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM?<br />
GREAT CLASS.<br />
Y<br />
WHY?<br />
7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM?<br />
NONE<br />
Y<br />
WHY?<br />
8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />
NONE<br />
9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />
NONE<br />
8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />
NONE<br />
9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />
NONE<br />
Arts in Education Service - School Evaluations <strong>2011</strong>-<strong>2012</strong><br />
Page 178 of 332
ARTIST: KATONAH ART CENTER<br />
CONTRACT #: A8202<br />
TITLE OF PROGRAM: KATHLEEN FAY - FAIRYWORLD ARTS & CRAFTS<br />
TYPE OF PROGRAM: WORKSHOP<br />
DISTRICT/ SCHOOL: CHAPPAQUA/ROARING BROOK ELEM.<br />
# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />
# OF STUDENTS: 12 GRADE(S) K-2<br />
DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 1/10-3/6/12<br />
NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />
STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 X STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />
ARTIST: KATONAH ART CENTER<br />
CONTRACT #: A8281B<br />
TITLE OF PROGRAM: MARY PICKWELL - FAIRY CRAFT<br />
TYPE OF PROGRAM: WORKSHOP<br />
DISTRICT/ SCHOOL: KATONAH/LEWISBORO/KATONAH ELEM. SCHOOL<br />
# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />
# OF STUDENTS: 9 GRADE(S) K-2<br />
DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 1/20-3/16/12<br />
NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />
STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 X STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />
1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />
1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />
1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />
2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />
3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />
4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />
5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />
6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />
4<br />
5<br />
4<br />
4<br />
4<br />
N/<br />
1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />
2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />
3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />
4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />
5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />
6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />
3<br />
3<br />
3<br />
3<br />
3<br />
3<br />
7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y<br />
THE STUDENTS REALLY ENJOYED THE PROGRAM.<br />
WHY?<br />
7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM?<br />
GOOD ENOUGH CLASS.<br />
Y<br />
WHY?<br />
8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />
NONE<br />
9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />
WE HAD A LOT OF ROOM CHANGES THIS YEAR SO WE NEED<br />
FLEXIBILITY.<br />
8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />
NONE<br />
9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />
NONE<br />
ARTIST: KATONAH ART CENTER<br />
CONTRACT #: A8281A<br />
TITLE OF PROGRAM: MARY PICKWELL - WIZARD CRAFTS<br />
TYPE OF PROGRAM: WORKSHOP<br />
DISTRICT/ SCHOOL: KATONAH/LEWISBORO/KATONAH ELEM. SCHOOL<br />
# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />
# OF STUDENTS: 7 GRADE(S) 1-4<br />
DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 1/17-3/13/12<br />
NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />
STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 X STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />
ARTIST: KATONAH ART CENTER<br />
CONTRACT #: A8115A<br />
TITLE OF PROGRAM: MARY PLATT - BEASTMASTER CRAFTS<br />
TYPE OF PROGRAM: WORKSHOP<br />
DISTRICT/ SCHOOL: CHAPPAQUA/WESTORCHARD ELEM.<br />
# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />
# OF STUDENTS: 7 GRADE(S) K-2<br />
DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 1/9-3/5/12<br />
NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />
STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 X STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />
1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />
1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />
1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />
2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />
3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />
4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />
5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />
6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />
1<br />
2<br />
2<br />
1<br />
2<br />
1<br />
1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />
2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />
3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />
4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />
5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />
6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
N/<br />
7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM?<br />
NOT A GOOD FIT WITH OUR STUDENTS.<br />
N<br />
WHY?<br />
7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM?<br />
NONE<br />
Y<br />
WHY?<br />
8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />
NONE<br />
9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />
NONE<br />
8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />
NONE<br />
9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />
NONE<br />
Arts in Education Service - School Evaluations <strong>2011</strong>-<strong>2012</strong><br />
Page 179 of 332
ARTIST: KATONAH ART CENTER<br />
CONTRACT #: A8202<br />
TITLE OF PROGRAM: MARY PLATT - CAMP CRAFTS<br />
TYPE OF PROGRAM: WORKSHOP<br />
DISTRICT/ SCHOOL: CHAPPAQUA/ROARING BROOK ELEM.<br />
# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />
# OF STUDENTS: 13 GRADE(S) K-2<br />
DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 1/11-2/29/12<br />
NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />
STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 X STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />
ARTIST: KATONAH ART CENTER<br />
CONTRACT #: A8202<br />
TITLE OF PROGRAM: QUINCY EGGINTON - EARTHWORKS<br />
TYPE OF PROGRAM: WORKSHOP<br />
DISTRICT/ SCHOOL: CHAPPAQUA/ROARING BROOK ELEM.<br />
# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />
# OF STUDENTS: 12 GRADE(S) K-2<br />
DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 1/13-3/9/12<br />
NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />
STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 X STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />
1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />
1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />
1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />
2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />
3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />
4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />
5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />
6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />
4<br />
4<br />
5<br />
4<br />
N/<br />
N/<br />
1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />
2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />
3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />
4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />
5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />
6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />
4<br />
4<br />
4<br />
4<br />
4<br />
N/<br />
7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM?<br />
KAC ALWAYS HAS GREAT STAFF.<br />
Y<br />
WHY?<br />
7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM?<br />
QUINCY GAVE A GREAT CLASS.<br />
Y<br />
WHY?<br />
8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />
NONE<br />
9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />
NONE<br />
8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />
TRY TO BE FLEXIBLE WITH CHANGES IN ROOMS.<br />
9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />
NONE<br />
ARTIST: KATONAH ART CENTER<br />
CONTRACT #: A8202<br />
TITLE OF PROGRAM: SARAH GLICKMAN - MOSAICS<br />
TYPE OF PROGRAM: WORKSHOP<br />
DISTRICT/ SCHOOL: CHAPPAQUA/ROARING BROOK ELEM.<br />
# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />
# OF STUDENTS: 9 GRADE(S) 3 & 4<br />
DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 1/12-3/8/12<br />
NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />
STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 X STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />
ARTIST: KATONAH ART CENTER<br />
CONTRACT #: A8116<br />
TITLE OF PROGRAM: SARAH GLICKMAN - MOSAICS<br />
TYPE OF PROGRAM: WORKSHOP<br />
DISTRICT/ SCHOOL:<br />
# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />
CHAPPAQUA/GRAFFLIN ELEM.<br />
# OF STUDENTS: 9 GRADE(S) 2-4<br />
DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 1/9-3/12/12<br />
NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />
STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 X STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />
1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />
1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />
1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />
2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />
3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />
4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />
5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />
6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />
4<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
4<br />
N/<br />
1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />
2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />
3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />
4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />
5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />
6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />
3<br />
3<br />
3<br />
3<br />
3<br />
3<br />
7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM?<br />
SARAH WAS A WONDERFUL INSTRUCTOR.<br />
Y<br />
WHY?<br />
7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM?<br />
NONE<br />
Y<br />
WHY?<br />
8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />
NONE<br />
9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />
NONE<br />
8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />
NONE<br />
9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />
NONE<br />
Arts in Education Service - School Evaluations <strong>2011</strong>-<strong>2012</strong><br />
Page 180 of 332
ARTIST: KATYA GRINEVA<br />
CONTRACT #: A8323<br />
TITLE OF PROGRAM: PIANIST PERFORMANCE - CLASSICAL MUSIC FOR<br />
CHILDREN<br />
TYPE OF PROGRAM: ASSEMBLY<br />
DISTRICT/ SCHOOL:<br />
# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />
TUCKAHOE/W. E. COTTLE ELEM.<br />
# OF STUDENTS: GRADE(S) 3-5<br />
DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 2/11/12<br />
NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />
STANDARD 1 STANDARD 2 STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />
1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />
ARTIST: KAZUKO OMORI<br />
CONTRACT #: A8224<br />
TITLE OF PROGRAM: DISCOVER JAPAN THROUGH ART<br />
TYPE OF PROGRAM: WORKSHOP<br />
DISTRICT/ SCHOOL: LAKELAND/COPPER BEECH MIDDLE SCHOOL<br />
# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />
# OF STUDENTS: 120 GRADE(S) 6 & 7<br />
DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 3/26-30/12<br />
NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />
STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 X STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4 X<br />
1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />
1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />
2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />
3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />
4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />
5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />
6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />
7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />
SHE IS A WORLD CLASS PIANIST.<br />
8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />
NONE<br />
9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />
NONE<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
1.<br />
2.<br />
3.<br />
4.<br />
5.<br />
6.<br />
STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />
ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />
EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />
ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />
TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />
QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />
STUDENTS LEARNED TRADITIONAL JAPANESE GREETINGS,<br />
NUMBERS AND FOLK STORIES. THEY CREATED ORIGAMI AND<br />
WERE COMPLETELY ENGAGED. SOME CLASSES LEARNED<br />
JAPANESE CALLIGRAPHY. AN AMAZING CULTURAL EXPERIENCE.<br />
8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />
NONE<br />
9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />
I HIGHLY RECOMMEND HER FOR ANY CULTURE ENRICHMENT.<br />
ARTIST: KAZUKO OMORI<br />
CONTRACT #: A8819<br />
TITLE OF PROGRAM: JAPANESE CALLIGRAPHY & KIRIGAMI<br />
TYPE OF PROGRAM: WORKSHOP<br />
DISTRICT/ SCHOOL:<br />
# OF TEACHERS: 3<br />
PELHAM/SIWANOY ELEM.<br />
# OF STUDENTS: 58 GRADE(S) 3<br />
DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 5/16-18/12<br />
NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />
STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 X STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4 X<br />
ARTIST: KAZUKO OMORI<br />
CONTRACT #: A7618<br />
TITLE OF PROGRAM: JAPANESE CULTURE & ART<br />
TYPE OF PROGRAM: WORKSHOP<br />
DISTRICT/ SCHOOL:<br />
# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />
PELHAM/HUTCHINSON ELEM.<br />
# OF STUDENTS: GRADE(S) 1-5<br />
DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 10/12-12/8/11<br />
NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />
STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 X STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4 X<br />
1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />
1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />
1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />
2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />
3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />
4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />
5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />
6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />
7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />
THE PRESENTATION WAS WELL PREPARED AND EDUCATIONAL.<br />
THE STUDENTS ENJOYED IT VERY MUCH.<br />
8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />
NONE<br />
9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />
NONE<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
1.<br />
2.<br />
3.<br />
4.<br />
5.<br />
6.<br />
STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />
ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />
EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />
ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />
TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />
QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />
KAZUKO'S CLASS IS FABULOUS. IT IS TRULY UNBELIEVABLE THE<br />
WAY SHE TEACHES HER STUDENTS ORAGAMI AND JAPANESE<br />
CALLIGRAPHY.<br />
8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />
NONE<br />
9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />
WE LOOK FORWARD TO HAVING HER BACK.<br />
Arts in Education Service - School Evaluations <strong>2011</strong>-<strong>2012</strong><br />
Page 181 of 332
ARTIST: KAZUKO OMORI<br />
CONTRACT #: A7644<br />
TITLE OF PROGRAM: JAPANESE CULTURE & ART<br />
TYPE OF PROGRAM: WORKSHOP<br />
DISTRICT/ SCHOOL:<br />
# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />
PELHAM/SIWANOY ELEM.<br />
# OF STUDENTS: 8 GRADE(S) 1 & 2<br />
DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 10/7-12/9/11<br />
NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />
STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 X STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4 X<br />
ARTIST: KAZUKO OMORI<br />
CONTRACT #: A8372A<br />
TITLE OF PROGRAM: JAPANESE CULTURE & ART I<br />
TYPE OF PROGRAM: WORKSHOP<br />
DISTRICT/ SCHOOL:<br />
# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />
PELHAM/HUTCHINSON ELEM.<br />
# OF STUDENTS: 10 GRADE(S) 1 & 2<br />
DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 2/8-4/4/12<br />
NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />
STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 X STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4 X<br />
1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />
1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />
1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />
2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />
3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />
4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />
5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />
6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />
4<br />
4<br />
4<br />
4<br />
N/<br />
5<br />
1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />
2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />
3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />
4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />
5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />
6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM?<br />
NONE<br />
8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />
NONE<br />
9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />
NONE<br />
Y<br />
WHY?<br />
7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />
STUDENTS AND PARENTS LOVE HOW SHE CHANGES HER<br />
CURRICULUM TO REFLECT THE SEASONS.<br />
8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />
NONE<br />
9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />
NONE<br />
ARTIST: KAZUKO OMORI<br />
CONTRACT #: A8052A<br />
TITLE OF PROGRAM: JAPANESE CULTURE & ART I<br />
TYPE OF PROGRAM: WORKSHOP<br />
DISTRICT/ SCHOOL:<br />
# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />
PELHAM/PROSPECT HILL ELEM.<br />
# OF STUDENTS: 8 GRADE(S) 3-5<br />
DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 1/9-3/12/12<br />
NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />
STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 X STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4 X<br />
ARTIST: KAZUKO OMORI<br />
CONTRACT #: A8372B<br />
TITLE OF PROGRAM: JAPANESE CULTURE & ART II<br />
TYPE OF PROGRAM: WORKSHOP<br />
DISTRICT/ SCHOOL:<br />
# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />
PELHAM/HUTCHINSON ELEM.<br />
# OF STUDENTS: 10 GRADE(S) 3-5<br />
DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 2/9-4/5/12<br />
NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />
STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 X STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4 X<br />
1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />
1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />
1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />
2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />
3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />
4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />
5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />
6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
N/<br />
1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />
2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />
3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />
4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />
5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />
6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM?<br />
NONE<br />
8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />
NONE<br />
9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />
NONE<br />
Y<br />
WHY?<br />
7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />
STUDENTS AND PARENTS LOVE HOW SHE CHANGES HER<br />
PROGRAMS TO REFLECT THE SEASONS.<br />
8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />
NONE<br />
9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />
NONE<br />
Arts in Education Service - School Evaluations <strong>2011</strong>-<strong>2012</strong><br />
Page 182 of 332
ARTIST: KAZUKO OMORI<br />
CONTRACT #: A8362<br />
TITLE OF PROGRAM: JAPANEXE CULTURE & ART<br />
TYPE OF PROGRAM: WORKSHOP<br />
DISTRICT/ SCHOOL:<br />
# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />
PELHAM/SIWANOY ELEM.<br />
# OF STUDENTS: 9 GRADE(S) K-2<br />
DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 2/3-3/29/12<br />
NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />
STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 X STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4 X<br />
ARTIST: KEEP THE COUNTRY DANCING, INC. CONTRACT #: A8271A<br />
TITLE OF PROGRAM: AMERICAN FOOTSTEPS<br />
TYPE OF PROGRAM: ASSEMBLY<br />
DISTRICT/ SCHOOL: CHAPPAQUA/BELL MIDDLE SCHOOL<br />
# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />
# OF STUDENTS: 170 GRADE(S) 5<br />
DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 5/2/12<br />
NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />
STANDARD 1 STANDARD 2 STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4 X<br />
1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />
1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />
1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />
2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />
3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />
4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />
5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />
6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />
2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />
3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />
4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />
5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />
6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />
3<br />
3<br />
3<br />
3<br />
N/<br />
N/<br />
7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM?<br />
NONE<br />
8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />
NONE<br />
9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />
NONE<br />
Y<br />
WHY?<br />
7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />
THIS PROGRAM NEEDS AN AREA WITH A LOT OF SPACE AND<br />
SMALL GROUPS TO BE EFFECTIVE.<br />
8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />
NONE<br />
9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />
NONE<br />
ARTIST: KEEP THE COUNTRY DANCING, INC. CONTRACT #: A8125<br />
TITLE OF PROGRAM: HOEDOWN<br />
TYPE OF PROGRAM: WORKSHOP<br />
DISTRICT/ SCHOOL:<br />
# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />
ARDSLEY/CONCORD ROAD ELEM.<br />
# OF STUDENTS: 150 GRADE(S) 2<br />
DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 6/1/12<br />
NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />
STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4 X<br />
ARTIST: KEEP THE COUNTRY DANCING, INC. CONTRACT #: A8640<br />
TITLE OF PROGRAM: SQUARE DANCING<br />
TYPE OF PROGRAM: WORKSHOP<br />
DISTRICT/ SCHOOL:<br />
# OF TEACHERS: 10<br />
BRIARCLIFF/TODD ELEM.<br />
# OF STUDENTS: 112 GRADE(S) 5<br />
DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 5/31/12<br />
NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />
STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4 X<br />
1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />
1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />
1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />
2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />
3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />
4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />
5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />
6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />
2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />
3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />
4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />
5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />
6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />
THIS IS A WONDERFUL CULMINATING EVENT. THE 2ND GRADE<br />
PARENTS AND CHILDREN ENJOY SPENDING TIME PERFORMING<br />
TOGETHER FOR A SQUARE DANCE.<br />
8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />
NONE<br />
9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />
EVERYONE ENJOYED THE ACTIVITY.<br />
7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />
PAT HAS A WONDERFULLY FIRM AND RESPECTFUL WAY OF<br />
INTRODUCING STUDENTS TO DANCING, QUICKLY OVERCOMING<br />
ANY AWKWARDNESS ON THEIR PART.<br />
8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />
NONE<br />
9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />
LOOKING FORWARD TO NEXT YEAR.<br />
Arts in Education Service - School Evaluations <strong>2011</strong>-<strong>2012</strong><br />
Page 183 of 332
ARTIST: KEEP THE COUNTRY DANCING, INC. CONTRACT #: A8271B<br />
TITLE OF PROGRAM: SQUARE DANCING<br />
TYPE OF PROGRAM: WORKSHOP<br />
DISTRICT/ SCHOOL: CHAPPAQUA/SEVEN BRIDGES MIDDLE SCHOOL<br />
# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />
# OF STUDENTS: 150 GRADE(S) 5<br />
DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 5/2/12<br />
NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />
STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4 X<br />
ARTIST: KEEP THE COUNTRY DANCING, INC. CONTRACT #: A8641<br />
TITLE OF PROGRAM: SQUARE DANCING<br />
TYPE OF PROGRAM: ASSEMBLY<br />
DISTRICT/ SCHOOL: KATONAH/LEWISBORO/KATONAH ELEM. SCHOOL<br />
# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />
# OF STUDENTS: 400 GRADE(S) K-5<br />
DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 4/20/12<br />
NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />
STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4 X<br />
1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />
1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />
1.<br />
2.<br />
3.<br />
4.<br />
5.<br />
6.<br />
STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />
ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />
EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />
ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />
TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />
QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />
4<br />
5<br />
4<br />
5<br />
5<br />
N/<br />
7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />
AMAZING THAT SHE HAD 150 STUDENTS DANCING, RESPONDING TO<br />
HER INSTRUCTIONS AND LEARNING THE DANCE TERMS AFTER<br />
JUST AN HOUR.<br />
8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />
NONE<br />
9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />
THE GROUP WAS RATHER LARGE. WE DISCUSSED HAVING TWO<br />
SESSIONS OF 75 STUDENTS EACH NEXT YEAR TO ENHANCE THE<br />
EXPERIENCE.<br />
1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />
2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />
3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />
4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />
5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />
6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />
7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />
NONE<br />
8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />
NONE<br />
9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />
NONE<br />
3.5<br />
4<br />
3<br />
4<br />
4<br />
3<br />
ARTIST: KEEP THE COUNTRY DANCING, INC. CONTRACT #: A7944<br />
TITLE OF PROGRAM: SQUARE DANCING WORKSHOP<br />
TYPE OF PROGRAM: RESIDENCY<br />
DISTRICT/ SCHOOL: HENDRICK HUDSON/BUCHANAN/VERPLANCK ELEM.<br />
# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />
# OF STUDENTS: 263 GRADE(S) 1-5<br />
DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 2/8-10/12<br />
NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />
STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4 X<br />
ARTIST: KENNETH SWINKIN<br />
CONTRACT #: A8842<br />
TITLE OF PROGRAM: DRUMMER FOR THE SHOW - PETER PAN<br />
TYPE OF PROGRAM: ASSEMBLY<br />
DISTRICT/ SCHOOL: CHAPPAQUA/ROARING BROOK ELEM.<br />
# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />
# OF STUDENTS: 113 GRADE(S) 2-4<br />
DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 5/30-6/3/12<br />
NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />
STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />
1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />
1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />
1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />
2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />
3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />
4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />
5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />
6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />
7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />
I ALREADY RECOMMENDED THIS TO THE HALDANE DISTRICT<br />
WHERE I LIVE.<br />
8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />
NONE<br />
9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />
PAT CANNON DID A TERRIFIC JOB MAKING SQUARE DANCING FUN<br />
FOR ALL THE STUDENTS - EVEN THE RELUCTANT PARTICIPANTS.<br />
BY DAY 2 THERE WAS A BUZZ OF EXCITEMENT AMONG ALL THE<br />
STUDENTS.<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />
2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />
3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />
4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />
5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />
6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />
7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />
NONE<br />
8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />
NONE<br />
9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />
A PLEASURE TO WORK WITH.<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
Arts in Education Service - School Evaluations <strong>2011</strong>-<strong>2012</strong><br />
Page 184 of 332
ARTIST: KENNETH W. MILLER dba KENNETH LITT CONTRACT #: A7760<br />
TITLE OF PROGRAM: FROM THE HEART OF LITTLE HAWK<br />
TYPE OF PROGRAM: ASSEMBLY<br />
DISTRICT/ SCHOOL: EASTCHESTER/WAVERLY EARLY CHILDHOOD CTR<br />
# OF TEACHERS: 6<br />
# OF STUDENTS: 257 GRADE(S) K<br />
DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 11/10/11<br />
NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />
STANDARD 1 STANDARD 2 STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4 X<br />
ARTIST: KEVIN BAKER<br />
CONTRACT #: A8311<br />
TITLE OF PROGRAM: SET DESIGN FOR THE SHOW - GUYS & DOLLS<br />
TYPE OF PROGRAM: RESIDENCY<br />
DISTRICT/ SCHOOL: KATONAH/LEWISBORO/JOHN JAY HIGH SCHOOL<br />
# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />
# OF STUDENTS: 150 GRADE(S) 9-12<br />
DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 2/1-3/22/12<br />
NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />
STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 X STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />
1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />
1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />
1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />
2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />
3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />
4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />
5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />
6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />
7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />
SPEAKS ON THE CHILDRENS LEVEL. TEACHES GREAT LIFE<br />
LESSONS. GREAT INTERESTING PROGRAM. WONDERFUL AND<br />
ENTERTAINING STORIES WITH LESSONS.<br />
8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />
NONE<br />
9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />
THE CHILDREN REALLY ENJOYED IT. IT WAS VERY EDUCATIONAL<br />
AS WELL AND ALWAYS ENTERTAINING.<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />
2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />
3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />
4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />
5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />
6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />
7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />
NONE<br />
8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />
NONE<br />
9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />
NONE<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
ARTIST: KEVIN BAKER<br />
CONTRACT #: A7686<br />
TITLE OF PROGRAM: SET DESIGNER FOR THE FALL SHOW<br />
TYPE OF PROGRAM: RESIDENCY<br />
DISTRICT/ SCHOOL: KATONAH/LEWISBORO/JOHN JAY HIGH SCHOOL<br />
# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />
# OF STUDENTS: 400 GRADE(S) 9-12<br />
DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 10/29, 30, 11/4 & 5/11<br />
NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />
STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 X STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />
ARTIST: KEVIN GERAGHTY<br />
CONTRACT #: A7526A<br />
TITLE OF PROGRAM: NATIVE AMERICAN CULTURE - ART & HISTORY<br />
TYPE OF PROGRAM: WORKSHOP<br />
DISTRICT/ SCHOOL:<br />
# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />
LAKELAND/VAN CORT ELEM.<br />
# OF STUDENTS: 100 GRADE(S) K<br />
DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 11/15 & 16/11<br />
NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />
STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 X STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4 X<br />
1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />
1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />
1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />
2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />
3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />
4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />
5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />
6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />
7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />
NONE<br />
8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />
NONE<br />
9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />
NONE<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
1.<br />
2.<br />
3.<br />
4.<br />
5.<br />
6.<br />
STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />
ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />
EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />
ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />
TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />
QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
N/<br />
7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />
KEVIN IS INCREDIBLY PATIENT WITH THE CHILDREN. HE HAS MANY<br />
HANDS ON OPPORTUNITIES AND STUDENT PARTICIPATION IS HIGH.<br />
8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />
NONE<br />
9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />
KEVIN HAS BEEN COMING TO OUR SCHOOL FOR MANY YEARS. HE<br />
HAS NEVER FAILED TO ENGAGE THE CHILDREN FOR HIS ENTIRE<br />
PROGRAM.<br />
Arts in Education Service - School Evaluations <strong>2011</strong>-<strong>2012</strong><br />
Page 185 of 332
ARTIST: KEVIN GERAGHTY<br />
CONTRACT #: A7602<br />
TITLE OF PROGRAM: NATIVE AMERICAN CULTURE - ART & HISTORY<br />
TYPE OF PROGRAM: WORKSHOP<br />
DISTRICT/ SCHOOL: HENDRICK HUDSON/FURNACE WOODS ELEM.<br />
# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />
# OF STUDENTS: 72 GRADE(S) 4<br />
DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 10/6/11<br />
NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />
STANDARD 1 STANDARD 2 STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4 X<br />
ARTIST: KEVIN GERAGHTY<br />
CONTRACT #: A7526B<br />
TITLE OF PROGRAM: SENSORY AWARENESS<br />
TYPE OF PROGRAM: ASSEMBLY<br />
DISTRICT/ SCHOOL:<br />
# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />
LAKELAND/VAN CORT ELEM.<br />
# OF STUDENTS: 100 GRADE(S) K<br />
DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 5/17 & 18/12<br />
NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />
STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 X STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />
1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />
1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />
1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />
2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />
3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />
4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />
5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />
6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />
2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />
3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />
4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />
5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />
6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />
KEVIN ALWAYS GIVES A HANDS-ON INTERESTING PROGRAM.<br />
8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />
NONE<br />
9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />
THANKS.<br />
7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />
HE IS GREAT. WE ARE THANKFULL FOR THE OPPORTUNITY TO<br />
HAVE HIM.<br />
8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />
NONE<br />
9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />
NONE<br />
ARTIST: KEVIN NATHANIEL HYLTON<br />
CONTRACT #: A8873<br />
TITLE OF PROGRAM: MBIRA WORKSHOPS - CREATING AN AFRICAN<br />
INSTRUMENT<br />
TYPE OF PROGRAM: WORKSHOP<br />
DISTRICT/ SCHOOL: NEW ROCHELLE/WARD ELEM. SCHOOL<br />
# OF TEACHERS: 8<br />
# OF STUDENTS: 179 GRADE(S) 3<br />
DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 6/1-14/12<br />
NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />
STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 X STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4 X<br />
1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />
ARTIST: KID POWER CARES, INC. dba KID POWE<br />
CONTRACT #: A8846<br />
TITLE OF PROGRAM: KID POWER & THE PLANET PROTECTORS<br />
TYPE OF PROGRAM: ASSEMBLY<br />
DISTRICT/ SCHOOL: NEW ROCHELLE/WARD ELEM. SCHOOL<br />
# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />
# OF STUDENTS: 550 GRADE(S) K-3<br />
DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 5/18/12<br />
NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />
STANDARD 1 STANDARD 2 STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />
1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />
1.<br />
2.<br />
3.<br />
4.<br />
5.<br />
6.<br />
STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />
ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />
EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />
ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />
TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />
QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
4<br />
7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />
KEVIN'S VISITS WERE EAGERLY ANTICIPATED. HE IS A TALENTED<br />
MUSIC EDUCATOR.<br />
8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />
WE'D WELCOME ADDITIONAL MATERIALS.<br />
9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />
ALL WERE IMPRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM. THIS WAS A UNIQUE<br />
EDUCATIONAL OPPORTUNITY FOR ALL OF US.<br />
1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />
2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />
3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />
4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />
5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />
6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />
7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />
A GREAT EDUCATION AND ENTERTAINING PERFORMANCE.<br />
8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />
NONE<br />
9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />
NONE<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
N/<br />
Arts in Education Service - School Evaluations <strong>2011</strong>-<strong>2012</strong><br />
Page 186 of 332
ARTIST: KID POWER CARES, INC. dba KID POWE CONTRACT #: A7571<br />
TITLE OF PROGRAM: KID POWER & THE PLANET PROTECTORS -<br />
OPERATION LUNCH LINE<br />
TYPE OF PROGRAM: ASSEMBLY<br />
DISTRICT/ SCHOOL: EASTCHESTER/GREENVALE ELEM.<br />
# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />
# OF STUDENTS: GRADE(S) 2<br />
DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 3/16/12<br />
NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />
STANDARD 1 STANDARD 2 STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />
1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />
ARTIST: KIM JOANNE KOVACH<br />
CONTRACT #: A8747<br />
TITLE OF PROGRAM: AUTHOR VISIT<br />
TYPE OF PROGRAM: WORKSHOP<br />
DISTRICT/ SCHOOL: KATONAH/LEWISBORO/INCREASE MILLER ELEM.<br />
# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />
# OF STUDENTS: 66 GRADE(S) 2<br />
DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 4/24/12<br />
NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />
STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />
1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />
1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />
2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />
3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />
4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />
5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />
6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />
7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />
CHILDREN LEARNED ABOUT NUTRITION, PORTION CONTROL,<br />
EXERCISE IN A FUN WAY.<br />
8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />
NONE<br />
9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />
NONE<br />
5<br />
5<br />
4<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />
2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />
3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />
4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />
5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />
6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />
7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />
SHE INSPIRED EVEN THE MOST RELUCTANT WRITERS. HER<br />
WORKSHOP WAS GRADE APPROPRIATE.<br />
8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />
NONE<br />
9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />
IT IS ESPECIALLY NICE FOR THE CHILDREN TO BE ABLE TO WORK<br />
WITH A LOCAL AUTHOR.<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
ARTIST: KIM JOANNE KOVACH<br />
CONTRACT #: A7586<br />
TITLE OF PROGRAM: AUTHOR VISIT<br />
TYPE OF PROGRAM: WORKSHOP<br />
DISTRICT/ SCHOOL: KATONAH/LEWISBORO/KATONAH ELEM. SCHOOL<br />
# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />
# OF STUDENTS: 67 GRADE(S) 2<br />
DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 3/8/12<br />
NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />
STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />
1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />
ARTIST: KIMBERLY HILL<br />
CONTRACT #: A7541<br />
TITLE OF PROGRAM: SET DESIGNER FOR THE SHOW - THE DROWSY<br />
CHAPERONE<br />
TYPE OF PROGRAM: RESIDENCY<br />
DISTRICT/ SCHOOL: CHAPPAQUA/HORACE GREELEY HIGH SCHOOL<br />
# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />
# OF STUDENTS: 25 GRADE(S) 9-12<br />
DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 9/24-11/19/11<br />
NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />
STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 X STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />
1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />
1.<br />
2.<br />
3.<br />
4.<br />
5.<br />
6.<br />
STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />
ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />
EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />
ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />
TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />
QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />
KIM'S WORKSHOP SERVED AS A WONDERFUL INTRO AND KICKED<br />
OFF A FICTION WRITING UNIT.<br />
8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />
NONE<br />
9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />
THANK YOU.<br />
1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />
2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />
3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />
4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />
5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />
6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />
7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />
THE DESIGN FOR DROWSY CHAPERONE IS INVENTIVE AND<br />
PRACTICAL.<br />
8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />
NONE<br />
9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />
I LOOKED FORWARDED TO SEEING THE DESIGN BECOME A<br />
REALITY.<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
Arts in Education Service - School Evaluations <strong>2011</strong>-<strong>2012</strong><br />
Page 187 of 332
ARTIST: KIRK EHRENREICH<br />
CONTRACT #: A8429<br />
TITLE OF PROGRAM: PIANO PLAYER FOR THE SHOW - THE DROWSY<br />
CHAPERONE<br />
TYPE OF PROGRAM: ASSEMBLY<br />
DISTRICT/ SCHOOL: KATONAH/LEWISBORO/JOHN JAY MIDDLE SCHOOL<br />
# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />
# OF STUDENTS: 75 GRADE(S) 6-8<br />
DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 3/3-17/12<br />
NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />
STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />
1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />
ARTIST: KJK PRODUCTIONS, INC.<br />
CONTRACT #: A8676<br />
TITLE OF PROGRAM: DIRECTOR FOR SHOW - PETER PAN<br />
TYPE OF PROGRAM: RESIDENCY<br />
DISTRICT/ SCHOOL: CHAPPAQUA/ROARING BROOK ELEM.<br />
# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />
# OF STUDENTS: 113 GRADE(S) 2-4<br />
DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 3/28-6/3/12<br />
NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />
STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 X STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />
1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />
1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />
2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />
3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />
4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />
5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />
6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />
7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />
KIRK WAS EXCELLENT. WE LOOK FORWARD TO WORKING WITH<br />
HIM AGAIN.<br />
8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />
NONE<br />
9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />
NONE<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
N/<br />
1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />
2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />
3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />
4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />
5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />
6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />
7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />
A WONDERFUL PRODUCTION. THE CHILDREN HAD A GREAT<br />
EXPERIENCE.<br />
8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />
NONE<br />
9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />
NONE<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
ARTIST: KJK PRODUCTIONS, INC.<br />
CONTRACT #: A8493<br />
TITLE OF PROGRAM: DIRECTOR FOR THE SHOW - ANNIE JR. / ASS'TS<br />
KRISTEN SPARRO & BRANDON JAMES WINN<br />
TYPE OF PROGRAM: RESIDENCY<br />
DISTRICT/ SCHOOL: CHAPPAQUA/WESTORCHARD ELEM.<br />
# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />
# OF STUDENTS: 105 GRADE(S) 2-4<br />
DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 4/16-29/12<br />
NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />
STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 X STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />
1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />
ARTIST: KJK PRODUCTIONS, INC.<br />
CONTRACT #: A8118<br />
TITLE OF PROGRAM: DIRECTOR FOR THE SHOW - FOOTLOOSE / ASS'TS<br />
ROBERT GRAHAM, SAMANTHA GROSSMAN &<br />
REBECCA STERN<br />
TYPE OF PROGRAM: RESIDENCY<br />
DISTRICT/ SCHOOL:<br />
CHAPPAQUA/BELL MIDDLE SCHOOL<br />
# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />
# OF STUDENTS: GRADE(S) 5-8<br />
DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 1/17-3/25/12<br />
NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />
STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 X STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />
1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />
1.<br />
2.<br />
3.<br />
4.<br />
5.<br />
6.<br />
STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />
ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />
EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />
ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />
TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />
QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />
THIS WAS AN AWESOME PROGRAM. OUR STUDENTS LOVED THE<br />
ENTIRE CREATIVE STAFF. THEY LEARNED ALL ASPECTS OF<br />
MUSICAL THEATRE AND HAD A GREAT TIME. ENTIRE STAFF WAS<br />
WARM, PATIENT AND ATTENTIVE TO THE KIDS.<br />
8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />
NONE<br />
9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />
NONE<br />
1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />
2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />
3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />
4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />
5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />
6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />
7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />
IT IS A FANTASTIC PROGRAM FOR THE STUDENTS.<br />
8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />
NONE<br />
9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />
NONE<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
Arts in Education Service - School Evaluations <strong>2011</strong>-<strong>2012</strong><br />
Page 188 of 332
ARTIST:<br />
KJK PRODUCTIONS, INC.<br />
CONTRACT #: A8110<br />
TITLE OF PROGRAM: KEVIN KEARINS - DIRECTOR FOR THE SHOW -<br />
SEUSSICAL / ASS'TS TERRY CANZIANI & REBECCA<br />
STERN<br />
TYPE OF PROGRAM: WORKSHOP<br />
DISTRICT/ SCHOOL:<br />
CHAPPAQUA/SEVEN BRIDGES MIDDLE SCHOOL<br />
# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />
# OF STUDENTS: 103 GRADE(S) 5-8<br />
DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE<br />
12/15/11-2/13/12<br />
NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />
STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 X STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />
1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />
ARTIST: KJK PRODUCTIONS, INC.<br />
CONTRACT #: A8821<br />
TITLE OF PROGRAM: KRISTIN SPARRO - CHOREOGRAPHER FOR SHOW -<br />
PETER PAN<br />
TYPE OF PROGRAM: WORKSHOP<br />
DISTRICT/ SCHOOL: CHAPPAQUA/ROARING BROOK ELEM.<br />
# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />
# OF STUDENTS: 120 GRADE(S) 2-4<br />
DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 5/1-6/3/12<br />
NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />
STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 X STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />
1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />
1.<br />
2.<br />
3.<br />
4.<br />
5.<br />
6.<br />
STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />
ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />
EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />
ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />
TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />
QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />
KEVIN NOT ONLY TAUGHT EXCELLENT THEATER SKILLS BUT<br />
CONFIDENCE AND COURAGE THROUGH PERFORMANCE AS WELL.<br />
PLUS A WONDERFUL EXPERIENCE WORKING AS A TEAM.<br />
8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />
NONE<br />
9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />
NONE<br />
1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />
2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />
3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />
4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />
5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />
6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />
7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />
NONE<br />
8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />
NONE<br />
9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />
WONDERFUL ENERGETIC TEACHER WITH LOTS OF PATIENCE.<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
N/<br />
ARTIST: KNIGHTHORSE THEATRE COMPANY, IN CONTRACT #: A8668<br />
TITLE OF PROGRAM: SHAKESCENES<br />
TYPE OF PROGRAM: RESIDENCY<br />
DISTRICT/ SCHOOL: PUTNAM VALLEY/PUTNAM VALLEY HIGH SCHOOL<br />
# OF TEACHERS: 3<br />
# OF STUDENTS: 175 GRADE(S) 9-12<br />
DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 4/12-23/12<br />
NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />
STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 X STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4 X<br />
ARTIST: KNIGHTHORSE THEATRE COMPANY, IN CONTRACT #: A8261<br />
TITLE OF PROGRAM: SHAKESPEARE ROMEO & JULIET<br />
TYPE OF PROGRAM: ASSEMBLY/WORKSHOP<br />
DISTRICT/ SCHOOL: DOBBS FERRY/DOBBS FERRY MIDDLE SCHOOL<br />
# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />
# OF STUDENTS: 115 GRADE(S) 8<br />
DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 1/23/12<br />
NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />
STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 X STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4 X<br />
1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />
1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />
1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />
2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />
3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />
4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />
5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />
6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />
7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />
WONDERFUL PROGRAM. THESE ARE AMAZING PROFESSIONALS<br />
WHO BRING SHAKESPEARE TO LIFE.<br />
8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />
NONE<br />
9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />
WE LOVED THEM.<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />
2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />
3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />
4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />
5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />
6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />
7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />
THEY BRING SHAKESPEARE TO LIFE FOR THE STUDENTS. THEY<br />
HELPED THE STUDENTS FEEL COMFORTABLE READING AND<br />
ACTING SINGLE LINES.<br />
8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />
NONE<br />
9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />
THANK YOU FOR A GREAT DAY.<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
Arts in Education Service - School Evaluations <strong>2011</strong>-<strong>2012</strong><br />
Page 189 of 332
ARTIST: KNIGHTLEE, LLC<br />
CONTRACT #: A8413<br />
TITLE OF PROGRAM: LEE KNIGHT - BOOKS ALIVE / BLACK HISTORY<br />
CONCERT<br />
TYPE OF PROGRAM: ASSEMBLY<br />
DISTRICT/ SCHOOL:<br />
# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />
YORKTOWN/BROOKSIDE ELEM.<br />
# OF STUDENTS: 300 GRADE(S) K-3<br />
DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 2/17/12<br />
NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />
STANDARD 1 STANDARD 2 STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4 X<br />
1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />
ARTIST: KRISTOPHEER THORNTON<br />
CONTRACT #: A8452<br />
TITLE OF PROGRAM: SET DESIGN & CONSTRUCTION FOR THE SHOW - A<br />
FUNNY THING HAPPENED ON THE WAY TO THE<br />
FORUM<br />
TYPE OF PROGRAM: RESIDENCY<br />
DISTRICT/ SCHOOL:<br />
PUTNAM VALLEY/PUTNAM VALLEY HIGH SCHOOL<br />
# OF TEACHERS: 3<br />
# OF STUDENTS: 400 GRADE(S) 9-12<br />
DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 3/3-4/23/12<br />
NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />
STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 X STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />
1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />
1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />
2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />
3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />
4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />
5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />
6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />
7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />
THE CONTENT MATERIAL, ALTHOUGH SERIOUS IN NATURE, WAS<br />
MADE LIGHT AND AGE APPROPRIATE. THE CHILDREN LEARNED<br />
THROUGH ACTING AND SINGING.<br />
8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />
HAVE MS. LEE GET AN ASSISTANT.<br />
9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />
I APPRECIATED THE TIME ALLOWED FOR QUESTIONS. IT SHOWED<br />
THEY TOOK SOMETHING AWAY FROM THE PROGRAM.<br />
3<br />
4<br />
5<br />
4<br />
5<br />
5<br />
1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />
2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />
3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />
4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />
5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />
6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />
7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />
NONE<br />
8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />
NONE<br />
9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />
NONE<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
ARTIST: KRISTOPHEER THORNTON<br />
CONTRACT #: A7780<br />
TITLE OF PROGRAM: SET DESIGN & CONSTRUCTION FOR THE SHOW -<br />
DRACULA<br />
TYPE OF PROGRAM: RESIDENCY<br />
DISTRICT/ SCHOOL: PUTNAM VALLEY/PUTNAM VALLEY HIGH SCHOOL<br />
# OF TEACHERS: 2<br />
# OF STUDENTS: 50 GRADE(S) 9-12<br />
DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 11/1-12/5/11<br />
NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />
STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 X STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />
1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />
ARTIST: LANI CHANG<br />
CONTRACT #: A8358<br />
TITLE OF PROGRAM: INTRO TO THE VIOLIN<br />
TYPE OF PROGRAM: WORKSHOP<br />
DISTRICT/ SCHOOL:<br />
# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />
PELHAM/SIWANOY ELEM.<br />
# OF STUDENTS: 9 GRADE(S) K-2<br />
DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 2/1-4/4/12<br />
NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />
STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 X STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />
1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />
1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />
2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />
3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />
4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />
5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />
6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />
7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />
NONE<br />
8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />
NONE<br />
9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />
NONE<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />
2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />
3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />
4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />
5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />
6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />
7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />
NONE<br />
8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />
NONE<br />
9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />
NONE<br />
4<br />
4<br />
4<br />
4<br />
4<br />
4<br />
Arts in Education Service - School Evaluations <strong>2011</strong>-<strong>2012</strong><br />
Page 190 of 332
ARTIST: LANI CHANG<br />
CONTRACT #: A8047<br />
TITLE OF PROGRAM: INTRO TO THE VIOLIN<br />
TYPE OF PROGRAM: WORKSHOP<br />
DISTRICT/ SCHOOL:<br />
# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />
PELHAM/PROSPECT HILL ELEM.<br />
# OF STUDENTS: 8 GRADE(S) K-2<br />
DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 1/9-3/5/12<br />
NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />
STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 X STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />
ARTIST: LANI CHANG<br />
CONTRACT #: A7611<br />
TITLE OF PROGRAM: INTRO TO THE VIOLIN<br />
TYPE OF PROGRAM: WORKSHOP<br />
DISTRICT/ SCHOOL:<br />
# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />
PELHAM/SIWANOY ELEM.<br />
# OF STUDENTS: 8 GRADE(S) K-2<br />
DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 10/5-11/30/11<br />
NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />
STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 X STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />
1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />
1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />
1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />
2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />
3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />
4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />
5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />
6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
N/<br />
1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />
2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />
3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />
4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />
5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />
6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
N/<br />
5<br />
7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM?<br />
NONE<br />
Y<br />
WHY?<br />
7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM?<br />
NONE<br />
Y<br />
WHY?<br />
8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />
NONE<br />
9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />
NONE<br />
8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />
NONE<br />
9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />
NONE<br />
ARTIST: LANI KING CHANG<br />
CONTRACT #: A7964<br />
TITLE OF PROGRAM: INTRO TO THE VIOLIN<br />
TYPE OF PROGRAM: WORKSHOP<br />
DISTRICT/ SCHOOL:<br />
# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />
PELHAM/COLONIAL ELEM.<br />
# OF STUDENTS: 8 GRADE(S) K-2<br />
DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 12/2/11-2/16/12<br />
NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />
STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 X STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />
1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />
ARTIST: LAURA A. BETZ-FAY<br />
CONTRACT #: A7712<br />
TITLE OF PROGRAM: VIOLA PLAYER FOR THE SHOW - ANNIE GET YOUR<br />
GUN<br />
TYPE OF PROGRAM: ASSEMBLY<br />
DISTRICT/ SCHOOL: LAKELAND/WALTER PANAS HIGH SCHOOL<br />
# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />
# OF STUDENTS: 100 GRADE(S) 9-12<br />
DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 11/14-19/11<br />
NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />
STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />
1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />
1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />
2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />
3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />
4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />
5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />
6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />
7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />
LANI IS A WONDERFUL AND PATIENT TEACHER. SHE<br />
ENTHUSIASTICALLY TEACHERS THE BASICS OF PLAYING THE<br />
VIOLIN AND MAKES IT FUN.<br />
8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />
NONE<br />
9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />
THE CHILDREN HAD A WONDERFUL TIME.<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
N/<br />
N/<br />
1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />
2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />
3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />
4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />
5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />
6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />
7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />
NONE<br />
8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />
NONE<br />
9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />
NONE<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
Arts in Education Service - School Evaluations <strong>2011</strong>-<strong>2012</strong><br />
Page 191 of 332
ARTIST: LAURA A. BETZ-FAY<br />
CONTRACT #: A8331<br />
TITLE OF PROGRAM: VIOLA PLAYER FOR THE SHOW - MY FAIR LADY<br />
TYPE OF PROGRAM: ASSEMBLY<br />
DISTRICT/ SCHOOL: LAKELAND/WALTER PANAS HIGH SCHOOL<br />
# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />
# OF STUDENTS: 200 GRADE(S) 9-12<br />
DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 4/30-5/5/12<br />
NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />
STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />
1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />
ARTIST: LAURA SHERWOOD<br />
CONTRACT #: A8444<br />
TITLE OF PROGRAM: PRODUCTION DESIGNER FOR THE SHOW - A FUNNY<br />
THING HAPPENED ON THE WAY TO THE FORUM<br />
TYPE OF PROGRAM: RESIDENCY<br />
DISTRICT/ SCHOOL: PUTNAM VALLEY/PUTNAM VALLEY HIGH SCHOOL<br />
# OF TEACHERS: 3<br />
# OF STUDENTS: 400 GRADE(S) 9-12<br />
DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 3/3-4/23/12<br />
NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />
STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 X STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />
1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />
1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />
2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />
3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />
4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />
5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />
6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />
7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />
NONE<br />
8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />
NONE<br />
9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />
NONE<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />
2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />
3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />
4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />
5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />
6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />
7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />
NONE<br />
8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />
NONE<br />
9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />
NONE<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
ARTIST: LAURA SHERWOOD<br />
CONTRACT #: A7819<br />
TITLE OF PROGRAM: PRODUCTION DESIGNER FOR THE SHOW - DRACULA<br />
TYPE OF PROGRAM: RESIDENCY<br />
DISTRICT/ SCHOOL: PUTNAM VALLEY/PUTNAM VALLEY HIGH SCHOOL<br />
# OF TEACHERS: 2<br />
# OF STUDENTS: 50 GRADE(S) 9-12<br />
DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 11/1-12/4/11<br />
NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />
STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 X STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />
1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />
ARTIST: LAUREN ELLIS<br />
CONTRACT #: A8801<br />
TITLE OF PROGRAM: VIOLIN PLAYER FOR THE SHOW - A FUNNY THING<br />
HAPPENED ON THE WAY TO THE FORUM<br />
TYPE OF PROGRAM: ASSEMBLY<br />
DISTRICT/ SCHOOL: PUTNAM VALLEY/PUTNAM VALLEY HIGH SCHOOL<br />
# OF TEACHERS: 3<br />
# OF STUDENTS: 400 GRADE(S) 9-12<br />
DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 4/13-23/12<br />
NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />
STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />
1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />
1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />
2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />
3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />
4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />
5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />
6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />
7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />
NONE<br />
8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />
NONE<br />
9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />
NONE<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />
2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />
3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />
4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />
5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />
6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />
7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />
NONE<br />
8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />
NONE<br />
9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />
NONE<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
N/<br />
Arts in Education Service - School Evaluations <strong>2011</strong>-<strong>2012</strong><br />
Page 192 of 332
ARTIST: LAUREN HOSFORD CORTEZ<br />
CONTRACT #: A8510<br />
TITLE OF PROGRAM: FRENCH HORN PLAYER FOR THE SHOW - BEAUTY<br />
AND THE BEAST<br />
TYPE OF PROGRAM: ASSEMBLY<br />
DISTRICT/ SCHOOL: PLEASANTVILLE/PLEASANTVILLE HIGH SCHOOL<br />
# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />
# OF STUDENTS: 400 GRADE(S) 9-12<br />
DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 3/9-17/12<br />
NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />
STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />
ARTIST: LAUREN VALENTI<br />
CONTRACT #: A8019<br />
TITLE OF PROGRAM: COURTRY WESTERN & HIP HOP DANCING FOR JAZZ<br />
CO.<br />
TYPE OF PROGRAM: WORKSHOP<br />
DISTRICT/ SCHOOL: TUCKAHOE/TUCKAHOE HIGH SCHOOL<br />
# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />
# OF STUDENTS: 60 GRADE(S) 9-12<br />
DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 11/28/11-3/3/12<br />
NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />
STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 X STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4 X<br />
1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />
1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />
1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />
2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />
3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />
4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />
5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />
6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
N/<br />
5<br />
N/<br />
1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />
2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />
3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />
4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />
5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />
6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
N/<br />
7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM?<br />
GREAT SUPPORT FOR OUR PRODUCTION.<br />
Y<br />
WHY?<br />
7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM?<br />
DANCE IS EDUCATIONAL, CULTURAL AND FUN.<br />
Y<br />
WHY?<br />
8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />
NONE<br />
9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />
NONE<br />
8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />
TIME MANAGEMENT.<br />
9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />
NONE<br />
ARTIST: LAURIE KELLER<br />
CONTRACT #: A8014<br />
TITLE OF PROGRAM: AUTHOR/ILLUSTRATOR VISIT<br />
TYPE OF PROGRAM: ASSEMBLY<br />
DISTRICT/ SCHOOL:<br />
# OF TEACHERS: 4<br />
IRVINGTON/DOWS LANE ELEM.<br />
# OF STUDENTS: 473 GRADE(S) K-3<br />
DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 12/2/11<br />
NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />
STANDARD 1 STANDARD 2 STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />
ARTIST: LAURIE KELLER<br />
CONTRACT #: A8390<br />
TITLE OF PROGRAM: AUTHOR/ILLUSTRATOR VISIT<br />
TYPE OF PROGRAM: ASSEMBLY<br />
DISTRICT/ SCHOOL: KATONAH/LEWISBORO/LEWISBORO ELEM.<br />
# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />
# OF STUDENTS: GRADE(S) K-2<br />
DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 3/28/12<br />
NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />
STANDARD 1 STANDARD 2 STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />
1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />
1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />
1.<br />
2.<br />
3.<br />
4.<br />
5.<br />
6.<br />
STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />
ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />
EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />
ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />
TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />
QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />
5<br />
5<br />
4<br />
5<br />
5<br />
4<br />
7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />
SHE EXPLAINED HER CREATIVE PROCESS AND SHOWED HOW SHE<br />
CREATED CHARACTERS. THEY SAW THEMSELVES AS ARTISTS.<br />
8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />
PERHAPS FOCUS ON WRITING PROCESS A LITTLE MORE.<br />
9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />
MS. KELLER WAS WONDERFUL. SHE SKILLFULLY ADAPTED HER<br />
PRESENTATION FOR THE DEVELOPMENTAL LEVEL OF THE DIVERSE<br />
STUDENTS. TEACHERS AND STUDENTS WERE DELIGHTED.<br />
1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />
2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />
3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />
4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />
5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />
6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />
7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />
NONE<br />
8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />
NONE<br />
9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />
NONE<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
Arts in Education Service - School Evaluations <strong>2011</strong>-<strong>2012</strong><br />
Page 193 of 332
ARTIST: LAURIE KELLER<br />
CONTRACT #: A8686<br />
TITLE OF PROGRAM: AUTHOR/ILLUSTRATOR VISIT<br />
TYPE OF PROGRAM: ASSEMBLY<br />
DISTRICT/ SCHOOL:<br />
# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />
SOMERS/PRIMROSE ELEM.<br />
# OF STUDENTS: 255 GRADE(S) 1<br />
DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 3/29/12<br />
NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />
STANDARD 1 STANDARD 2 STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />
1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />
ARTIST: LAWRENCE ALEXANDER<br />
CONTRACT #: A8665<br />
TITLE OF PROGRAM: SOUND DESIGNER FOR THE SHOW - A FUNNY THING<br />
HAPPENED ON THE WAY TO THE FORUM<br />
TYPE OF PROGRAM: RESIDENCY<br />
DISTRICT/ SCHOOL: PUTNAM VALLEY/PUTNAM VALLEY HIGH SCHOOL<br />
# OF TEACHERS: 3<br />
# OF STUDENTS: 400 GRADE(S) 9-12<br />
DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 4/12-23/12<br />
NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />
STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />
1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />
1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />
2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />
3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />
4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />
5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />
6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />
7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />
HER PRESENTATION WAS CHILD FRIENDLY AND INTERACTIVE.<br />
CHILDREN WERE VERY ENGAGED.<br />
8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />
NONE<br />
9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />
NONE<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
4<br />
1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />
2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />
3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />
4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />
5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />
6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />
7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />
NONE<br />
8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />
NONE<br />
9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />
NONE<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
ARTIST: LAWRENCE D'AMICO<br />
CONTRACT #: A8315<br />
TITLE OF PROGRAM: A MURAL TIME LINE OF ART & HISTORY<br />
TYPE OF PROGRAM: RESIDENCY<br />
DISTRICT/ SCHOOL: LAKELAND/COPPER BEECH MIDDLE SCHOOL<br />
# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />
# OF STUDENTS: GRADE(S) 8<br />
DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 2/22-3/14/12<br />
NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />
STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 X STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4 X<br />
ARTIST: LEORA COHEN<br />
CONTRACT #: A8448B<br />
TITLE OF PROGRAM: KIDS ON THE BLOCK<br />
TYPE OF PROGRAM: ASSEMBLY<br />
DISTRICT/ SCHOOL: NEW ROCHELLE/DAVIS ELEM. SCHOOL<br />
# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />
# OF STUDENTS: 125 GRADE(S) 3<br />
DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 2/27/12<br />
NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />
STANDARD 1 STANDARD 2 STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4 X<br />
1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />
1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />
1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />
2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />
3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />
4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />
5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />
6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />
7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />
HE TOTALLY ENGAGED THE STUDENTS. HE WAS ABLE TO HELP<br />
THE STUDENTS ACHIEVE A LEVEL OF CREATIVITY THAT THEY<br />
WERE UNAWARE THEY COULD ACCOMPLISH. THE END RESULT<br />
WAS AMAZING.<br />
8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />
NONE<br />
9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />
NONE<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
1.<br />
2.<br />
3.<br />
4.<br />
5.<br />
6.<br />
STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />
ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />
EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />
ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />
TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />
QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />
IT IS AN EXCELLENT TOOL FOR TEACHING TOLERANCE, RESPECT,<br />
ETC.<br />
8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />
NONE<br />
9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />
NONE<br />
Arts in Education Service - School Evaluations <strong>2011</strong>-<strong>2012</strong><br />
Page 194 of 332
ARTIST: LEORA COHEN<br />
CONTRACT #: A7670B<br />
TITLE OF PROGRAM: KIDS ON THE BLOCK<br />
TYPE OF PROGRAM: ASSEMBLY<br />
DISTRICT/ SCHOOL:<br />
# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />
BREWSTER/JFK ELEM.<br />
# OF STUDENTS: GRADE(S) 3<br />
DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 11/19/11<br />
NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />
STANDARD 1 STANDARD 2 STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />
ARTIST: LEORA COHEN<br />
CONTRACT #: A8121B<br />
TITLE OF PROGRAM: KIDS ON THE BLOCK<br />
TYPE OF PROGRAM: ASSEMBLY<br />
DISTRICT/ SCHOOL: KATONAH/LEWISBORO/KATONAH ELEM. SCHOOL<br />
# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />
# OF STUDENTS: GRADE(S) 3<br />
DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 3/8/12<br />
NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />
STANDARD 1 STANDARD 2 STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />
1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />
1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />
1.<br />
2.<br />
3.<br />
4.<br />
5.<br />
6.<br />
STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />
ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />
EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />
ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />
TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />
QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />
GREAT SHOW IN A CHILD FRIENDLY MANNER WITH A WONDERFUL<br />
MESSAGE.<br />
8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />
NONE<br />
9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />
NONE<br />
ARTIST: LEORA COHEN<br />
TITLE OF PROGRAM: KIDS ON THE BLOCK<br />
TYPE OF PROGRAM: ASSEMBLY<br />
DISTRICT/ SCHOOL:<br />
CHAPPAQUA/GRAFFLIN ELEM.<br />
CONTRACT #: A7810B<br />
# OF TEACHERS: 5<br />
# OF STUDENTS: 105 GRADE(S) 3<br />
DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE<br />
5/4/12<br />
NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />
STANDARD 1 STANDARD 2 STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />
1.<br />
2.<br />
3.<br />
4.<br />
5.<br />
6.<br />
STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />
ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />
EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />
ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />
TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />
QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />
THIS PROGRAM WAS AN EXCELLENT WAY TO INTEGRATE A<br />
DISCUSSION ON LEARNING DIFFERENCES AND ACCEPTANCE WITH<br />
OUR CLASSES.<br />
8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />
NONE<br />
9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />
ARTIST:<br />
GREAT PRESENTATION. I LIKED THE ADDITION OF<br />
COMPREHENSION QUESTIONS FOLLOWING THE SHOW. THE<br />
STUDENTS REALLY SEEMED TO ENJOY BEING ABLE TO PROCESS.<br />
LIDO DECK PRODUCTIONS - NEAL SCH<br />
TITLE OF PROGRAM: AUTHOR VISIT<br />
TYPE OF PROGRAM: ASSEMBLY<br />
DISTRICT/ SCHOOL:<br />
SOMERS/SOMERS MIDDLE SCHOOL<br />
CONTRACT #: A8409<br />
# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />
# OF STUDENTS: 580 GRADE(S) 7 & 8<br />
DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 3/30/12<br />
NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />
STANDARD 1 STANDARD 2 STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />
1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />
1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />
1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />
2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />
3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />
4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />
5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />
6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />
5<br />
4<br />
5<br />
5<br />
4<br />
5<br />
1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />
2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />
3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />
4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />
5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />
6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
N/<br />
7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />
STUDENTS LEARNED A LOT FROM THIS PRESENTATION.<br />
7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />
STUDENTS LOVE HIS BOOKS AND HAD LOTS OF QUESTIONS.<br />
8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />
NONE<br />
9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />
NONE<br />
8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />
NONE<br />
9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />
NONE<br />
Arts in Education Service - School Evaluations <strong>2011</strong>-<strong>2012</strong><br />
Page 195 of 332
ARTIST: LINCOLN CENTER INSTITUTE<br />
CONTRACT #: A8277B<br />
TITLE OF PROGRAM: AARON DRAPER - FIESTA FLAMENCA<br />
TYPE OF PROGRAM: RESIDENCY<br />
DISTRICT/ SCHOOL: NEW ROCHELLE/DANIEL WEBSTER ELEM.<br />
# OF TEACHERS: 2<br />
# OF STUDENTS: GRADE(S) K & 1<br />
DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE APRIL, <strong>2012</strong><br />
NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />
STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 X STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4 X<br />
ARTIST: LINDA DUCI-KILIK<br />
CONTRACT #: A8350<br />
TITLE OF PROGRAM: CHOREOGRAPHER FOR SENIOR MUSICAL - XANADU<br />
TYPE OF PROGRAM: RESIDENCY<br />
DISTRICT/ SCHOOL: CHAPPAQUA/HORACE GREELEY HIGH SCHOOL<br />
# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />
# OF STUDENTS: 200 GRADE(S) 12<br />
DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 1/30-4/21/12<br />
NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />
STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 X STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />
1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />
1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />
1.<br />
2.<br />
3.<br />
4.<br />
5.<br />
6.<br />
STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />
ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />
EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />
ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />
TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />
QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />
A GREAT PART OF AN INDEPTH MINI UNIT FOR OUR SECOND GRADE<br />
SPANISH CLASSES.<br />
8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />
NONE<br />
9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />
FANTASTIC.<br />
ARTIST: LINDA DUCI-KILIK<br />
CONTRACT #: A8525<br />
TITLE OF PROGRAM: CHOREOGRAPHER FOR THE MUSICAL - ONCE UPON<br />
A MATTRESS<br />
TYPE OF PROGRAM: RESIDENCY<br />
DISTRICT/ SCHOOL:<br />
SOMERS/SOMERS HIGH SCHOOL<br />
# OF TEACHERS: 2<br />
# OF STUDENTS: 50 GRADE(S) 9-12<br />
DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE<br />
2/13-3/18/12<br />
NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />
STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 X STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />
1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />
2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />
3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />
4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />
5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />
6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />
7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />
IMPORTANT FOR STUDENTS TO LEARN AND SEE HOW ALL THE<br />
COMPONENTS OF A MUSICAL SHOW COME TOGETHER.<br />
8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />
NONE<br />
9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />
ARTIST:<br />
LINDA IS EXTREMELY TALENTED AND DEDICATED TO HER CRAFT.<br />
SHE IS AN EXCEPTIONAL CHOREOGRAPHER WITH A RARE GIFT OF<br />
BEING ABLE TO TEACH STUDENTS WITH VARYING LEVELS OF<br />
DANCE, MOVEMENT, KNOWLEDGE AND ABILITIES.<br />
LINDA DUCI-KILIK<br />
CONTRACT #: A7590<br />
TITLE OF PROGRAM: CHOREOGRAPHER FOR THE SHOW - THE DROWSY<br />
CHAPERONE<br />
TYPE OF PROGRAM: RESIDENCY<br />
DISTRICT/ SCHOOL:<br />
CHAPPAQUA/HORACE GREELEY HIGH SCHOOL<br />
# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />
# OF STUDENTS: 27 GRADE(S) 9-12<br />
DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 9/13-11/19/11<br />
NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />
STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 X STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />
1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />
1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />
2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />
3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />
4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />
5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />
6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />
2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />
3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />
4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />
5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />
6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM?<br />
NONE<br />
Y<br />
WHY?<br />
7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y<br />
LINDA IS A GIFTED AND DEDICATED CHOREOGRAPHER.<br />
WHY?<br />
8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />
NONE<br />
9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />
NONE<br />
8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />
NONE<br />
9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />
I LOOK FORWARD TO WORKING WITH LINDA AGAIN.<br />
Arts in Education Service - School Evaluations <strong>2011</strong>-<strong>2012</strong><br />
Page 196 of 332
ARTIST: LINDA RUSSELL<br />
CONTRACT #: A8184<br />
TITLE OF PROGRAM: COLONIAL STORIES, MUSIC AND MORE<br />
TYPE OF PROGRAM: WORKSHOP<br />
DISTRICT/ SCHOOL: IRVINGTON/MAIN STREET SCHOOL<br />
# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />
# OF STUDENTS: 130 GRADE(S) 4<br />
DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 3/14/12<br />
NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />
STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 X STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4 X<br />
ARTIST: LINDA SABATELLI CARELLI<br />
CONTRACT #: A8111<br />
TITLE OF PROGRAM: CHOREOGRAPHER FOR THE SHOW - SEUSSICAL<br />
TYPE OF PROGRAM: RESIDENCY<br />
DISTRICT/ SCHOOL: CHAPPAQUA/SEVEN BRIDGES MIDDLE SCHOOL<br />
# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />
# OF STUDENTS: 103 GRADE(S) 5-8<br />
DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 12/15/11-2/13/12<br />
NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />
STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 X STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />
1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />
1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />
1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />
2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />
3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />
4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />
5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />
6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />
7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />
THE IS GREAT FOR OUR 4TH GRADE COLONIAL DAY.<br />
8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />
NONE<br />
9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />
GREAT JOB ONCE AGAIN.<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
N/<br />
1.<br />
2.<br />
3.<br />
4.<br />
5.<br />
6.<br />
STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />
ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />
EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />
ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />
TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />
QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />
SHE DELIVERED A PROFESSIONAL EXPERIENCE THAT YIELDED<br />
HEIGHTENED SKILLS AND CONFIDENCE IN THE STUDENTS. PLUS<br />
THEY HAD A LOT OF FUN.<br />
8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />
NONE<br />
9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />
NONE<br />
ARTIST: LINDA SUE PARK<br />
CONTRACT #: A7598<br />
TITLE OF PROGRAM: AUTHOR VISIT<br />
TYPE OF PROGRAM: ASSEMBLY<br />
DISTRICT/ SCHOOL: YORKTOWN/MILDRED STRANG MIDDLE SCHOOL<br />
# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />
# OF STUDENTS: GRADE(S) 6<br />
DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 10/11/11<br />
NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />
STANDARD 1 STANDARD 2 STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />
ARTIST: LISA EDHEIMER<br />
CONTRACT #: A8204<br />
TITLE OF PROGRAM: FASHION DESIGNS & CREATIONS<br />
TYPE OF PROGRAM: WORKSHOP<br />
DISTRICT/ SCHOOL: CHAPPAQUA/ROARING BROOK ELEM.<br />
# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />
# OF STUDENTS: 10 GRADE(S) 3 & 4<br />
DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 1/12-3/8/12<br />
NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />
STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 X STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />
1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />
1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />
1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />
2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />
3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />
4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />
5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />
6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />
7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />
EXCELLENT PROGRAM. SHE ENGAGES THE STUDENTS DURING<br />
HER PRESENTATION IN A POSITIVE MANNER.<br />
8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />
NONE<br />
9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />
GREAT JOB. FOR ALL THREE ASSEMBLIES THE STUDENTS WERE<br />
WELL PREPARED.<br />
4<br />
N/<br />
N/<br />
5<br />
5<br />
4<br />
1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />
2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />
3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />
4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />
5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />
6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />
7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />
LISA DESIGNS WONDERFUL PROJECTS.<br />
8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />
NONE<br />
9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />
NONE<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
Arts in Education Service - School Evaluations <strong>2011</strong>-<strong>2012</strong><br />
Page 197 of 332
ARTIST: LISA GRAFF<br />
CONTRACT #: A8756<br />
TITLE OF PROGRAM: AUTHOR VISIT<br />
TYPE OF PROGRAM: ASSEMBLY/WORKSHOP<br />
DISTRICT/ SCHOOL: SOMERS/SOMERS INTERMEDIATE SCHOOL<br />
# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />
# OF STUDENTS: 830 GRADE(S) 3<br />
DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 4/16/12<br />
NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />
STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 X STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />
ARTIST: LISA HARDE<br />
CONTRACT #: A8108<br />
TITLE OF PROGRAM: COSTUME DESIGNER FOR THE SHOW - BARNUM<br />
TYPE OF PROGRAM: RESIDENCY<br />
DISTRICT/ SCHOOL: NORTH SALEM/NORTH SALEM MS & HS<br />
# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />
# OF STUDENTS: 51 GRADE(S) 6-12<br />
DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 12/5/11-2/12/12<br />
NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />
STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 X STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />
1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />
1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />
1.<br />
2.<br />
3.<br />
4.<br />
5.<br />
6.<br />
STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />
ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />
EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />
ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />
TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />
QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />
LISA'S BOOKS ARE PERFECT MIDDLE GRADE READERS AND SHE IS<br />
VERY ENGAGING.<br />
8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />
NONE<br />
9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />
NONE<br />
1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />
2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />
3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />
4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />
5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />
6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />
7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />
LISA'S DRIVE AND PASSION FOR HER WORK IS INCREDIBLE AND<br />
CONTAGIOUS TO STUDENTS.<br />
8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />
WE NEED TO WORK TIMETABLES BETTER SO STUDENTS ARE<br />
COMFORTABLE WITH TECHNICAL ASPECTS OF PRODUCTION<br />
SOONER.<br />
9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />
NONE<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
ARTIST: LORI SIEGEL<br />
CONTRACT #: A8787<br />
TITLE OF PROGRAM: MUSIC & MOVEMENT - READ ALOUD<br />
TYPE OF PROGRAM: RESIDENCY<br />
DISTRICT/ SCHOOL: NEW ROCHELLE/DANIEL WEBSTER ELEM.<br />
# OF TEACHERS: 2<br />
# OF STUDENTS: 13 GRADE(S) 3-5<br />
DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 5/31-6/14/12<br />
NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />
STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 X STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />
1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />
ARTIST: LORRAINE DRAGER-BAKER<br />
CONTRACT #: A8715<br />
TITLE OF PROGRAM: WOODWIND PLAYER FOR THE SHOW - A FUNNY<br />
THING HAPPENED ON THE WAY TO THE FORUM<br />
TYPE OF PROGRAM: ASSEMBLY<br />
DISTRICT/ SCHOOL: PUTNAM VALLEY/PUTNAM VALLEY HIGH SCHOOL<br />
# OF TEACHERS: 3<br />
# OF STUDENTS: 400 GRADE(S) 9-12<br />
DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 4/13-23/12<br />
NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />
STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />
1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />
1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />
2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />
3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />
4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />
5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />
6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />
7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />
NONE<br />
8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />
NONE<br />
9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />
NONE<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />
2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />
3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />
4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />
5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />
6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />
7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />
NONE<br />
8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />
NONE<br />
9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />
NONE<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
N/<br />
Arts in Education Service - School Evaluations <strong>2011</strong>-<strong>2012</strong><br />
Page 198 of 332
ARTIST: LORRAINE DRAGER-BAKER<br />
CONTRACT #: A8660<br />
TITLE OF PROGRAM: WOODWIND PLAYER FOR THE SHOW - ONCE UPON A<br />
MATTRESS<br />
TYPE OF PROGRAM: ASSEMBLY<br />
DISTRICT/ SCHOOL:<br />
# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />
SOMERS/SOMERS HIGH SCHOOL<br />
# OF STUDENTS: 50 GRADE(S) 9-12<br />
DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 3/12-18/12<br />
NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />
STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />
1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />
ARTIST: LOU DEL BIANCO<br />
CONTRACT #: A7799A<br />
TITLE OF PROGRAM: ABE LINCOLN<br />
TYPE OF PROGRAM: ASSEMBLY<br />
DISTRICT/ SCHOOL: EASTCHESTER/WAVERLY EARLY CHILDHOOD CTR<br />
# OF TEACHERS: 8<br />
# OF STUDENTS: 246 GRADE(S) K<br />
DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 2/2/12<br />
NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />
STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />
1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />
1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />
2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />
3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />
4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />
5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />
6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />
7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />
NONE<br />
8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />
NONE<br />
9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />
NONE<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
1.<br />
2.<br />
3.<br />
4.<br />
5.<br />
6.<br />
STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />
ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />
EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />
ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />
TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />
QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />
4<br />
4<br />
4<br />
4<br />
4<br />
4<br />
7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />
INTERACTIVE AND FUN LESSONS BEING TAUGHT. CHILDREN ARE<br />
ENGAGED, ENTERTAINED, AND HE HAD GREAT MANAGEMENT OF<br />
THE AUDIENCE.<br />
8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />
MORE ANIMATION AND/OR MUSIC MOVEMENT ACTIVITIES.<br />
9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />
A LITTLE TOO LONG FOR THIS GRADE LEVEL.<br />
ARTIST: LOU DEL BIANCO<br />
CONTRACT #: A8009<br />
TITLE OF PROGRAM: ANCIENT MYTHS FROM AROUND THE WORLD<br />
TYPE OF PROGRAM: ASSEMBLY<br />
DISTRICT/ SCHOOL:<br />
# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />
MTP/WESTLAKE MIDDLE SCHOOL<br />
# OF STUDENTS: GRADE(S) 6<br />
DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 12/1/11<br />
NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />
STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4 X<br />
ARTIST: LOU DEL BIANCO<br />
CONTRACT #: A8450<br />
TITLE OF PROGRAM: AROUND THE WORLD<br />
TYPE OF PROGRAM: ASSEMBLY<br />
DISTRICT/ SCHOOL:<br />
# OF TEACHERS: 6<br />
BRIARCLIFF/TODD ELEM.<br />
# OF STUDENTS: GRADE(S) K-5<br />
DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 2/27/12<br />
NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />
STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4 X<br />
1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />
1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />
1.<br />
2.<br />
3.<br />
4.<br />
5.<br />
6.<br />
STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />
ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />
EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />
ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />
TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />
QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />
5<br />
5<br />
3<br />
5<br />
5<br />
N/<br />
7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />
STUDENTS CLEARLY ENJOY THIS PROGRAM. WITHIN OUR SOCIAL<br />
STUDIES CURRICULUM WE TEACH ANCIENT CIVILIZATIONS SO<br />
STUDENTS WERE FAMILIAR WITH SOME OF THE CONTENT.<br />
8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />
NONE<br />
9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />
NONE<br />
1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />
2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />
3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />
4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />
5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />
6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />
7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />
HIGHLY RECOMMEND.<br />
8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />
NONE<br />
9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />
MUCH POSITIVE FEEDBACK WAS GIVEN BY STAFF AND STUDENTS.<br />
5<br />
5<br />
4<br />
5<br />
4<br />
3<br />
Arts in Education Service - School Evaluations <strong>2011</strong>-<strong>2012</strong><br />
Page 199 of 332
ARTIST: LOU DEL BIANCO<br />
CONTRACT #: A7799B<br />
TITLE OF PROGRAM: AROUND THE WORLD<br />
TYPE OF PROGRAM: ASSEMBLY<br />
DISTRICT/ SCHOOL: EASTCHESTER/WAVERLY EARLY CHILDHOOD CTR<br />
# OF TEACHERS: 12 # OF STUDENTS: 245 GRADE(S) K<br />
DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 6/1/12<br />
NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />
STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4 X<br />
ARTIST: LOU DEL BIANCO<br />
CONTRACT #: A8078<br />
TITLE OF PROGRAM: MAKE A GOOD CHOICE<br />
TYPE OF PROGRAM: ASSEMBLY<br />
DISTRICT/ SCHOOL:<br />
# OF TEACHERS: 23<br />
LAKELAND/LINCOLN-TITUS ELEM.<br />
# OF STUDENTS: 482 GRADE(S) K-5<br />
DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 2/15/12<br />
NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />
STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />
1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />
1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />
1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />
2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />
3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />
4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />
5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />
6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />
7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />
THIS WAS AN INTERACTIVE SHOW WHICH INVOLVED LOU<br />
ENGAGING THE AUDIENCE WITH SONGS. STUDENTS STOOD,<br />
SNAPPED THEIR FINGERS AND DANCED WITH HIM. THEY WERE<br />
ACTIVELY ENGAGED AND DID NOT GROW RESTLESS.<br />
8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />
NONE<br />
9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />
AN ANNUAL FAVORITE.<br />
5<br />
5<br />
3<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
1.<br />
2.<br />
3.<br />
4.<br />
5.<br />
6.<br />
STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />
ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />
EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />
ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />
TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />
QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
N/<br />
7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />
LOU'S PERFORMANCE WAS INTERACTIVE, ENGAGING, ENERGETIC<br />
AND VERY AGE APPROPRIATE. THE THEME OF MAKING GOOD<br />
CHOICES SUPPORTED OUR CHARACTER ED PBIS PROGRAM.<br />
8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />
NONE<br />
9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />
WE HIGHLY RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM TO ALL. THE CHILDREN<br />
WERE TOTALLY ENGROSSED FOR THE ENTIRE TIME.<br />
ARTIST: LOU DEL BIANCO<br />
CONTRACT #: A7511<br />
TITLE OF PROGRAM: MAKE A GOOD CHOICE<br />
TYPE OF PROGRAM: ASSEMBLY<br />
DISTRICT/ SCHOOL:<br />
# OF TEACHERS: 6<br />
CHAPPAQUA/GRAFFLIN ELEM.<br />
# OF STUDENTS: 128 GRADE(S) K-4<br />
DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 9/16/11<br />
NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />
STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />
ARTIST: LOU DEL BIANCO<br />
CONTRACT #: A7573B<br />
TITLE OF PROGRAM: MAKE A GOOD CHOICE<br />
TYPE OF PROGRAM: ASSEMBLY/WORKSHOP<br />
DISTRICT/ SCHOOL:<br />
# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />
BYRAM HILLS/COMAN HILL ELEM.<br />
# OF STUDENTS: 507 GRADE(S) K-2<br />
DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 9/28/11<br />
NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />
STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />
1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />
1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />
1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />
2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />
3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />
4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />
5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />
6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />
7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />
STUDENTS WERE ENGAGED AND ENJOYED THE PROGRAM.<br />
LOVELY, HUMOROUS AND APPROPRIATE FOR THE AGE GROUP.<br />
8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />
WE SAW THE SAME PROGRAM LAST YEAR SO SOME CHANGES<br />
WOULD HAVE BEEN NICE.<br />
9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />
MESSAGE WAS GOOD BUT SEEMED A BIT OLD FASHIONED FOR<br />
TODAY'S YOUTH.<br />
4<br />
4<br />
4<br />
4<br />
4<br />
N/<br />
1.<br />
2.<br />
3.<br />
4.<br />
5.<br />
6.<br />
STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />
ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />
EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />
ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />
TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />
QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />
TALKS ABOUT GOOD CHOICES. NICE WAY TO KICK OFF SCHOOL<br />
YEAR.<br />
8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />
NONE<br />
9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />
NONE<br />
Arts in Education Service - School Evaluations <strong>2011</strong>-<strong>2012</strong><br />
Page 200 of 332
ARTIST: LOU DEL BIANCO<br />
CONTRACT #: A7955<br />
TITLE OF PROGRAM: MAKE A GOOD CHOICE<br />
TYPE OF PROGRAM: ASSEMBLY<br />
DISTRICT/ SCHOOL: LAKELAND/GEORGE WASHINGTON ELEM.<br />
# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />
# OF STUDENTS: 180 GRADE(S) K-2<br />
DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 12/8/11<br />
NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />
STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />
ARTIST: LOU DEL BIANCO<br />
CONTRACT #: A8681<br />
TITLE OF PROGRAM: MAKE A GOOD CHOICE<br />
TYPE OF PROGRAM: ASSEMBLY<br />
DISTRICT/ SCHOOL: EASTCHESTER/WAVERLY EARLY CHILDHOOD CTR<br />
# OF TEACHERS: 10 # OF STUDENTS: 225 GRADE(S) 1<br />
DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 4/5/12<br />
NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />
STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />
1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />
1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />
1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />
2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />
3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />
4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />
5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />
6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />
7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />
CHILDREN WERE ENGAGED AND INVOLVED.<br />
8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />
NONE<br />
9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />
WE LOOK FORWARD TO HAVING LOU BACK.<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
N/<br />
1.<br />
2.<br />
3.<br />
4.<br />
5.<br />
6.<br />
STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />
ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />
EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />
ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />
TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />
QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />
LOU DOES A WONDERFUL JOB ENGAGING THE STUDENTS AND<br />
HOLDING THEIR ATTENTION THROUGHTOUT THE PERFORMANCE.<br />
HE PRESENTED THE STUDENTS WITH SCENARIOS FROM HIS OWN<br />
CHILDHOOD AND ASKED THE STUDENTS TO THINK ABOUT HOW<br />
THEY COULD MAKE A GOOD CHOICE IF PRESENTED WITH A<br />
SIMILAR SCENARIO.<br />
8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />
NONE<br />
9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />
THE PROGRAM IS INTERACTIVE WITH A GREAT DEAL OF HUMOR,<br />
MUSIC, MOVEMENT AND AUDIENCE PARTICIPATION. IT IS PERFECT<br />
FOR THIS AGE GROUP AND IT ENHANCED AND SUPPORTED<br />
CHARACTER EDUCATION. IT ALSO PROMOTEED RESPECT,<br />
RESPONSIBILITY AND THINKING CAREFULLY ABOUT THE CHOICES<br />
THAT YOU MAKE.<br />
ARTIST: LOU DEL BIANCO<br />
CONTRACT #: A7933<br />
TITLE OF PROGRAM: MAKE A GOOD CHOICE<br />
TYPE OF PROGRAM: ASSEMBLY<br />
DISTRICT/ SCHOOL:<br />
# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />
SOMERS/PRIMROSE ELEM.<br />
# OF STUDENTS: 723 GRADE(S) K-2<br />
DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 10/26/11<br />
NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />
STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />
ARTIST: LOU DEL BIANCO<br />
CONTRACT #: A7600<br />
TITLE OF PROGRAM: MAKE A GOOD CHOICE<br />
TYPE OF PROGRAM: ASSEMBLY<br />
DISTRICT/ SCHOOL: CHAPPAQUA/WESTORCHARD ELEM.<br />
# OF TEACHERS: 5<br />
# OF STUDENTS: 509 GRADE(S) K-4<br />
DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 9/14/11<br />
NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />
STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />
1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />
1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />
1.<br />
2.<br />
3.<br />
4.<br />
5.<br />
6.<br />
STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />
ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />
EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />
ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />
TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />
QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />
IT HAD GREAT MESSAGES FOR CHILDREN. THE STUDENTS WERE<br />
ENGAGED AND IT FIT NICELY WITHIN SCHOOL THEME.<br />
8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />
NONE<br />
9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />
NONE<br />
1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />
2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />
3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />
4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />
5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />
6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />
7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />
GREAT SHOW, GOOD MESSAGES.<br />
8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />
MORE VISUAL FOR YOUNGER K-1.<br />
9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />
NONE<br />
4<br />
5<br />
4<br />
5<br />
4<br />
5<br />
Arts in Education Service - School Evaluations <strong>2011</strong>-<strong>2012</strong><br />
Page 201 of 332
ARTIST: LOU DEL BIANCO<br />
CONTRACT #: A7653<br />
TITLE OF PROGRAM: MAKE A GOOD CHOICE<br />
TYPE OF PROGRAM: ASSEMBLY<br />
DISTRICT/ SCHOOL:<br />
# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />
OSSINING/PARK SCHOOL<br />
# OF STUDENTS: GRADE(S) PRE K &<br />
DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 6/20/12<br />
NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />
STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />
ARTIST: LOU DEL BIANCO<br />
CONTRACT #: A7573A<br />
TITLE OF PROGRAM: STORYTELLING WORKSHOP<br />
TYPE OF PROGRAM: WORKSHOP<br />
DISTRICT/ SCHOOL:<br />
# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />
BYRAM HILLS/COMAN HILL ELEM.<br />
# OF STUDENTS: GRADE(S) 2<br />
DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 9/23 & 27/11<br />
NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />
STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 X STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />
1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />
1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />
1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />
2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />
3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />
4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />
5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />
6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />
7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />
NONE<br />
8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />
NONE<br />
9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />
NONE<br />
3<br />
3<br />
3<br />
4<br />
4<br />
N/<br />
1.<br />
2.<br />
3.<br />
4.<br />
5.<br />
6.<br />
STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />
ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />
EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />
ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />
TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />
QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />
I WOULD DEFINITELY RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM. LOU IS<br />
ENGAGING, HUMOROUS AND FUN ALL WHILE PROVIDING AN<br />
EDUCATIONAL PROGRAM.<br />
8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />
LOU DOES NOT NEED TO IMPROVE IN ANY WAY. HE IS EXCELLENT.<br />
9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />
WE ALWAYS ENJOY HIS WORKSHOPS.<br />
ARTIST: LOU DEL BIANCO<br />
CONTRACT #: A7740<br />
TITLE OF PROGRAM: THANKSGIVING DAY SHOW<br />
TYPE OF PROGRAM: ASSEMBLY<br />
DISTRICT/ SCHOOL: CHAPPAQUA/ROARING BROOK ELEM.<br />
# OF TEACHERS: 4<br />
# OF STUDENTS: 90 GRADE(S) 1<br />
DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 11/21/11<br />
NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />
STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4 X<br />
ARTIST: LOUISE EDEIKEN<br />
CONTRACT #: A8378B<br />
TITLE OF PROGRAM: COMMUNICATION THROUGH SONGS<br />
TYPE OF PROGRAM: RESIDENCY<br />
DISTRICT/ SCHOOL: NEW ROCHELLE/NEW ROCHELLE HS<br />
# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />
# OF STUDENTS: 24 GRADE(S) 9<br />
DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 2/2-3/5/12<br />
NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />
STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 X STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />
1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />
1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />
1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />
2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />
3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />
4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />
5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />
6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />
7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />
ARTIST WAS VERY ENGAGING.<br />
8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />
NONE<br />
9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />
NONE<br />
5<br />
5<br />
N/<br />
5<br />
5<br />
N/<br />
1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />
2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />
3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />
4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />
5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />
6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />
7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />
LOUISE IS ONE OF THE MOST ENGAGING COACHES FOR YOUNG<br />
SINGERS. SHE PROVIDES ERUDITE AND INFORMED OPINIONS.<br />
8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />
TWO WEEK ADVANCE PREPARATION INCLUDING MATERIALS<br />
DESCRIBING LOUISE'S BACKGROUND AND DESCRIPTIONS OF<br />
WHAT THE 42 PERIODS WOULD LOOK LIKE. INCLUDE LIST OF<br />
VOCABULARY WORDS AND HOW TO BEHAVE IN A MASTER CLASS<br />
SITUATION.<br />
9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />
NONE<br />
3<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
3<br />
N/<br />
Arts in Education Service - School Evaluations <strong>2011</strong>-<strong>2012</strong><br />
Page 202 of 332
ARTIST:<br />
LOUISE EDEIKEN<br />
TITLE OF PROGRAM: MUSICAL THEATRE WORKSHOPS<br />
TYPE OF PROGRAM: WORKSHOP<br />
DISTRICT/ SCHOOL:<br />
NEW ROCHELLE/NEW ROCHELLE HS<br />
CONTRACT #: A8378A<br />
# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />
# OF STUDENTS: GRADE(S) 10-12<br />
DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE<br />
2/7-9/12<br />
NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />
STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 X STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />
1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />
1.<br />
2.<br />
3.<br />
4.<br />
5.<br />
6.<br />
STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />
ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />
EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />
ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />
TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />
QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />
LOUISE IS THE CONSUMATE PROFESSIONAL AND KNOWS HOW TO<br />
APPROACH THE CRAFT AND TEACH THE STUDENTS HER SKILLS.<br />
8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />
NONE<br />
9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />
NONE<br />
ARTIST: LUANN ADAMS<br />
CONTRACT #: A8193<br />
TITLE OF PROGRAM: STORYTELLING TALES FROM DR. SEUSS &<br />
CHILDREN OF COURAGE<br />
TYPE OF PROGRAM: ASSEMBLY<br />
DISTRICT/ SCHOOL:<br />
LAKELAND/THOMAS JEFFERSON ELEM.<br />
# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />
# OF STUDENTS: GRADE(S) K-5<br />
DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE<br />
3/1/12<br />
NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />
STANDARD 1 STANDARD 2 STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />
ARTIST: LUANN ADAMS<br />
CONTRACT #: A7742<br />
TITLE OF PROGRAM: STORYTELLING RESIDENCY - CHILDREN OF<br />
COURAGE<br />
TYPE OF PROGRAM: ASSEMBLY/WORKSHOP<br />
DISTRICT/ SCHOOL:<br />
LAKELAND/COPPER BEECH MIDDLE SCHOOL<br />
# OF TEACHERS: 5<br />
# OF STUDENTS: 500 GRADE(S) 6<br />
DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 3/8-22/12<br />
NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />
STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />
1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />
1.<br />
2.<br />
3.<br />
4.<br />
5.<br />
6.<br />
STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />
ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />
EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />
ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />
TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />
QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />
STUDENTS TRULY ENJOY PARTICIPATING AND EVERYONE<br />
INVOLVED LEARNS ABOUT THEMSELVES AND THEIR PEERS IN NEW<br />
WAYS.<br />
8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />
NONE<br />
9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />
CAN'T WAIT FOR NEXT YEAR.<br />
ARTIST: LUBIMA KALIKOVA-SHENTOV<br />
CONTRACT #: A8010<br />
TITLE OF PROGRAM: PERFORMING IN A STRING ORCHESTRA -<br />
WORKSHOPS & SHOWS<br />
TYPE OF PROGRAM: RESIDENCY<br />
DISTRICT/ SCHOOL:<br />
MT.VERNON/LINCOLN ELEM SCHOOL<br />
# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />
# OF STUDENTS: GRADE(S) K-6<br />
DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE NOV., <strong>2011</strong>-MAY, <strong>2012</strong><br />
NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />
STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 X STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4 X<br />
1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />
1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />
1.<br />
2.<br />
3.<br />
4.<br />
5.<br />
6.<br />
STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />
ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />
EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />
ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />
TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />
QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />
4<br />
5<br />
4<br />
4<br />
54<br />
Y<br />
7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />
WE LOVED IT. IT WENT WITH OUR READERS AS LEADERS DAY AND<br />
DR. SEUSS'S BIRTHDAY.<br />
8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />
NONE<br />
9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />
NONE<br />
1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />
2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />
3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />
4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />
5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />
6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />
7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />
NONE<br />
8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />
NONE<br />
9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />
NONE<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
4<br />
4<br />
5<br />
Arts in Education Service - School Evaluations <strong>2011</strong>-<strong>2012</strong><br />
Page 203 of 332
ARTIST: LUDMILA GUFELD<br />
CONTRACT #: A7713<br />
TITLE OF PROGRAM: VIOLIN PLAYER FOR THE SHOW - ANNIE GET YOUR<br />
GUN<br />
TYPE OF PROGRAM: ASSEMBLY<br />
DISTRICT/ SCHOOL: LAKELAND/WALTER PANAS HIGH SCHOOL<br />
# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />
# OF STUDENTS: 100 GRADE(S) 9-12<br />
DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 11/14-19/11<br />
NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />
STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />
1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />
ARTIST: LUDMILA GUFELD<br />
CONTRACT #: A8334<br />
TITLE OF PROGRAM: VIOLIN PLAYER FOR THE SHOW - MY FAIR LADY<br />
TYPE OF PROGRAM: ASSEMBLY<br />
DISTRICT/ SCHOOL: LAKELAND/WALTER PANAS HIGH SCHOOL<br />
# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />
# OF STUDENTS: 200 GRADE(S) 9-12<br />
DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 4/30-5/5/12<br />
NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />
STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />
1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />
1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />
2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />
3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />
4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />
5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />
6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />
7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />
NONE<br />
8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />
NONE<br />
9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />
NONE<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />
2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />
3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />
4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />
5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />
6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />
7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />
NONE<br />
8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />
NONE<br />
9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />
NONE<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
ARTIST: LYNDSEY GARVIN<br />
CONTRACT #: A8023<br />
TITLE OF PROGRAM: HIP HOP & CONTEMPORARY DANCE FOR JAZZ CO<br />
TYPE OF PROGRAM: WORKSHOP<br />
DISTRICT/ SCHOOL: TUCKAHOE/TUCKAHOE HIGH SCHOOL<br />
# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />
# OF STUDENTS: 60 GRADE(S) 9-12<br />
DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 11/28/11-3/3/12<br />
NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />
STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 X STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4 X<br />
ARTIST: LYNNE BARASCH<br />
CONTRACT #: A8453<br />
TITLE OF PROGRAM: AUTHOR/ILLUSTRATOR VISIT<br />
TYPE OF PROGRAM: ASSEMBLY<br />
DISTRICT/ SCHOOL: KATONAH/LEWISBORO/LEWISBORO ELEM.<br />
# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />
# OF STUDENTS: 40 GRADE(S) K<br />
DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 3/2/12<br />
NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />
STANDARD 1 STANDARD 2 STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />
1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />
1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />
1.<br />
2.<br />
3.<br />
4.<br />
5.<br />
6.<br />
STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />
ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />
EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />
ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />
TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />
QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
N/<br />
7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />
DANCE IS AN ART AND ALSO CULTURAL, EDUCATIONAL AND FUN.<br />
8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />
TIME MANAGEMENT.<br />
9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />
NONE<br />
1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />
2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />
3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />
4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />
5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />
6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />
7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />
BETTER FOR GRADES 3 - 5.<br />
8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />
NONE<br />
9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />
WOULD BE A NICE PROGRAM FOR 3RD GRADES SINCE THEY TALK<br />
ABOUT OTHER COUNTRIES.<br />
3<br />
3<br />
3<br />
3<br />
3<br />
3<br />
Arts in Education Service - School Evaluations <strong>2011</strong>-<strong>2012</strong><br />
Page 204 of 332
ARTIST: MARC VON MOLNAR (VON EM)<br />
CONTRACT #: A7881<br />
TITLE OF PROGRAM: MUSICAL SHOW<br />
TYPE OF PROGRAM: ASSEMBLY<br />
DISTRICT/ SCHOOL: CHAPPAQUA/ROARING BROOK ELEM.<br />
# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />
# OF STUDENTS: 75 GRADE(S) K-4<br />
DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 10/26/11<br />
NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />
STANDARD 1 STANDARD 2 STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />
1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />
ARTIST: MARCIA DALEY-SAVO<br />
CONTRACT #: A8245<br />
TITLE OF PROGRAM: SET DESIGNER FOR THE SHOW - THE DROWSY<br />
CHAPERONE<br />
TYPE OF PROGRAM: RESIDENCY<br />
DISTRICT/ SCHOOL: KATONAH/LEWISBORO/JOHN JAY MIDDLE SCHOOL<br />
# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />
# OF STUDENTS: 75 GRADE(S) 6-8<br />
DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 1/15-3/15/12<br />
NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />
STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 X STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />
1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />
1.<br />
2.<br />
3.<br />
4.<br />
5.<br />
6.<br />
STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />
ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />
EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />
ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />
TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />
QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />
5<br />
5<br />
N/<br />
5<br />
5<br />
N/<br />
7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />
MARC HAS A GREAT APPROACH WITH STUDENTS AND CAN ADAPT<br />
TO INTENSE LEVEL AND AGE.<br />
8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />
NONE<br />
9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />
WOULD LOVE TO HAVE HIM BACK.<br />
1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />
2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />
3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />
4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />
5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />
6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />
7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />
THE SETS WERE BEAUTIFUL.<br />
8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />
NONE<br />
9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />
NONE<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
N/<br />
ARTIST: MARCIA DALEY-SAVO<br />
CONTRACT #: A7640<br />
TITLE OF PROGRAM: SET DESIGNER FOR THE SHOW - TWILIGHT ZONE<br />
TYPE OF PROGRAM: RESIDENCY<br />
DISTRICT/ SCHOOL: KATONAH/LEWISBORO/JOHN JAY MIDDLE SCHOOL<br />
# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />
# OF STUDENTS: 43 GRADE(S) 6-8<br />
DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 10/3-11/8/11<br />
NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />
STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 X STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />
ARTIST: MARIA CIARDELLO<br />
CONTRACT #: A8605<br />
TITLE OF PROGRAM: ITALIAN CULTURE, ART & LANGUAGE<br />
TYPE OF PROGRAM: WORKSHOP<br />
DISTRICT/ SCHOOL: EASTCHESTER/GREENVALE ELEM.<br />
# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />
# OF STUDENTS: 10 GRADE(S) 2-5<br />
DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 3/13-5/8/12<br />
NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />
STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 X STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4 X<br />
1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />
1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />
1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />
2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />
3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />
4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />
5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />
6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
N/<br />
1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />
2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />
3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />
4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />
5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />
6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
N/<br />
7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />
THE SETS TURNED OUT GREAT. MANY PEOPLE AND MANY<br />
CHILDREN WORKED TOGETHER TO CREATE A GREAT SHOW.<br />
8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />
NONE<br />
9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />
NONE<br />
7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM?<br />
ALWAYS A FAVORITE.<br />
8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />
NONE<br />
9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />
NONE<br />
Y<br />
WHY?<br />
Arts in Education Service - School Evaluations <strong>2011</strong>-<strong>2012</strong><br />
Page 205 of 332
ARTIST: MARIA CIARDIELLO<br />
CONTRACT #: A7667<br />
TITLE OF PROGRAM: ITALIAN CULTURE, ART & LANGUAGE<br />
TYPE OF PROGRAM: WORKSHOP<br />
DISTRICT/ SCHOOL: EASTCHESTER/GREENVALE ELEM.<br />
# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />
# OF STUDENTS: 16 GRADE(S) 2-5<br />
DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 10/21-12/16/11<br />
NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />
STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 X STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4 X<br />
ARTIST: MARIE HANIUK<br />
CONTRACT #: A8740<br />
TITLE OF PROGRAM: DRAWING<br />
TYPE OF PROGRAM: WORKSHOP<br />
DISTRICT/ SCHOOL:<br />
# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />
NORTH SALEM/PQ ELEM.<br />
# OF STUDENTS: 9 GRADE(S) 3-5<br />
DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 4/16-6/11/12<br />
NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />
STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 X STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />
1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />
1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />
1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />
2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />
3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />
4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />
5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />
6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
N/<br />
1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />
2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />
3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />
4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />
5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />
6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />
MARIA REALLY GAVE CHILDREN A TASTE OF ITALIAN CULTURE<br />
THROUGH SONGS & LANGUAGE.<br />
8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />
NONE<br />
9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />
GREAT CLASS.<br />
7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM?<br />
NONE<br />
8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />
NONE<br />
9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />
NONE<br />
Y<br />
WHY?<br />
ARTIST: MARIE HANIUK<br />
CONTRACT #: A8263<br />
TITLE OF PROGRAM: DRAWING<br />
TYPE OF PROGRAM: WORKSHOP<br />
DISTRICT/ SCHOOL:<br />
# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />
NORTH SALEM/PQ ELEM.<br />
# OF STUDENTS: 9 GRADE(S) 3-5<br />
DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 1/23-3/18/12<br />
NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />
STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 X STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />
ARTIST: MARIO CARTULARA<br />
CONTRACT #: A7627<br />
TITLE OF PROGRAM: ITALIAN CULTURE, ART & LANGUAGE<br />
TYPE OF PROGRAM: WORKSHOP<br />
DISTRICT/ SCHOOL:<br />
# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />
NORTH SALEM/PQ ELEM.<br />
# OF STUDENTS: 9 GRADE(S) K-3<br />
DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 10/5-11/30/11<br />
NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />
STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 X STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4 X<br />
1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />
1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />
1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />
2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />
3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />
4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />
5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />
6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />
2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />
3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />
4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />
5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />
6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM?<br />
NONE<br />
Y<br />
WHY?<br />
7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM?<br />
NONE<br />
Y<br />
WHY?<br />
8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />
NONE<br />
9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />
NONE<br />
8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />
NONE<br />
9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />
NONE<br />
Arts in Education Service - School Evaluations <strong>2011</strong>-<strong>2012</strong><br />
Page 206 of 332
ARTIST: MARIO MARCHESE<br />
CONTRACT #: A8205<br />
TITLE OF PROGRAM: MAGIC / HOCUS POCUS<br />
TYPE OF PROGRAM: WORKSHOP<br />
DISTRICT/ SCHOOL: CHAPPAQUA/ROARING BROOK ELEM.<br />
# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />
# OF STUDENTS: 15 GRADE(S) K-2<br />
DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 1/12-3/8/12<br />
NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />
STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 X STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />
ARTIST: MARION JONES-ARCHER<br />
CONTRACT #: A7905A<br />
TITLE OF PROGRAM: AFRICAN CULTURE & DANCES<br />
TYPE OF PROGRAM: RESIDENCY<br />
DISTRICT/ SCHOOL: MT.VERNON/PARKER ELEM. SCHOOL<br />
# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />
# OF STUDENTS: GRADE(S) K-6<br />
DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE NOV., <strong>2011</strong>-MAY, <strong>2012</strong><br />
NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />
STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 X STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4 X<br />
1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />
1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />
1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />
2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />
3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />
4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />
5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />
6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />
7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />
GREAT INSTRUCTOR.<br />
8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />
SOME OF THE TAKE HOME MATERIALS WERE TO SOPHISTICATED.<br />
9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />
NONE<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
4<br />
1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />
2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />
3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />
4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />
5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />
6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />
7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />
MARION CONTINUES TO BUILD SELF ESTEEM AND EXCITEMENT<br />
FOR CHILDREN AS THEY ARE EXPOSED TO THE ART OF DANCE.<br />
8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />
NONE<br />
9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />
NONE<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
ARTIST: MARION JONES-ARCHER<br />
CONTRACT #: A7905C<br />
TITLE OF PROGRAM: AFRICAN CULTURE & DANCES<br />
TYPE OF PROGRAM: RESIDENCY<br />
DISTRICT/ SCHOOL: MT.VERNON/MT. VERNON HIGH SCHOOL<br />
# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />
# OF STUDENTS: GRADE(S) 9-12<br />
DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE NOV., <strong>2011</strong>-MAY, <strong>2012</strong><br />
NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />
STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 X STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4 X<br />
ARTIST: MARION JONES-ARCHER<br />
CONTRACT #: A7905B<br />
TITLE OF PROGRAM: AFRICAN CULTURE & DANCES<br />
TYPE OF PROGRAM: RESIDENCY<br />
DISTRICT/ SCHOOL: MT.VERNON/DAVIS MIDDLE SCHOOL<br />
# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />
# OF STUDENTS: GRADE(S) 7 & 8<br />
DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE NOV., <strong>2011</strong>-MAY, <strong>2012</strong><br />
NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />
STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 X STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4 X<br />
1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />
1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />
1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />
2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />
3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />
4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />
5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />
6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />
2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />
3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />
4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />
5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />
6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM?<br />
NONE<br />
8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />
NONE<br />
9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />
NONE<br />
Y<br />
WHY?<br />
7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />
MARION CONTINUE TO BRING A SENSE OF CULTURE TO HER<br />
STUDENTS.<br />
8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />
NONE<br />
9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />
NONE<br />
Arts in Education Service - School Evaluations <strong>2011</strong>-<strong>2012</strong><br />
Page 207 of 332
ARTIST: MARION JONES-ARCHER<br />
CONTRACT #: A7862<br />
TITLE OF PROGRAM: AFRICAN CULTURE & DANCES<br />
TYPE OF PROGRAM: RESIDENCY<br />
DISTRICT/ SCHOOL: EASTCHESTER/EASTCHESTER HIGH SCHOOL<br />
# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />
# OF STUDENTS: GRADE(S) 9-12<br />
DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 11/3/11-1/19/12<br />
NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />
STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 X STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4 X<br />
ARTIST: MARION JONES-ARCHER<br />
CONTRACT #: A8024<br />
TITLE OF PROGRAM: AFRICAN JAZZ DANCING<br />
TYPE OF PROGRAM: WORKSHOP<br />
DISTRICT/ SCHOOL: TUCKAHOE/TUCKAHOE HIGH SCHOOL<br />
# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />
# OF STUDENTS: 60 GRADE(S) 9-12<br />
DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 11/28/11-3/3/12<br />
NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />
STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 X STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4 X<br />
1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />
1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />
1.<br />
2.<br />
3.<br />
4.<br />
5.<br />
6.<br />
STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />
ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />
EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />
ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />
TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />
QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />
THE STUDENTS LEARN HOW TO EXPRESS THEMSELVES THROUGH<br />
THE ART OF DANCE.<br />
8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />
NONE<br />
9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />
THE ART WAS PRESENTED IN AN ATTRACTIVE WAY.<br />
1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />
2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />
3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />
4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />
5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />
6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />
7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />
THE STUDENTS WERE CHALLENGED IN A CREATIVE PROCESS.<br />
8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />
NONE<br />
9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />
THE PROGRAM WAS PRESENTED IN AN ENJOYABLE WAY.<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
ARTIST: MARISABINA RUSSO STARK dba MARIS CONTRACT #: A7675<br />
TITLE OF PROGRAM: AUTHOR/ILLUSTRATOR VISIT<br />
TYPE OF PROGRAM: RESIDENCY<br />
DISTRICT/ SCHOOL:<br />
# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />
SOMERS/PRIMROSE ELEM.<br />
# OF STUDENTS: 240 GRADE(S) 1<br />
DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 11/16-18/11<br />
NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />
STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 X STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />
ARTIST: MARISABINA RUSSO STARK dba MARIS CONTRACT #: A8752<br />
TITLE OF PROGRAM: AUTHOR/ILLUSTRATOR VISIT<br />
TYPE OF PROGRAM: ASSEMBLY<br />
DISTRICT/ SCHOOL: PLEASANTVILLE/BEDFORD ROAD ELEM.<br />
# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />
# OF STUDENTS: 130 GRADE(S) 1<br />
DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 4/5/12<br />
NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />
STANDARD 1 STANDARD 2 STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />
1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />
1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />
1.<br />
2.<br />
3.<br />
4.<br />
5.<br />
6.<br />
STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />
ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />
EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />
ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />
TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />
QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
N/<br />
7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />
MS. RUSSO GAVE AN AMAZING PRESENTATION TO THE STUDENTS.<br />
SHE SHOWED THE CREATIVE PROCESS FROM START TO THE<br />
FINISHED PRODUCT.<br />
8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />
NONE<br />
9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />
NONE<br />
1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />
2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />
3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />
4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />
5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />
6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />
7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />
FABULOUS. THE STUDENTS AND STAFF LOVED IT.<br />
8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />
NONE<br />
9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />
NONE<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
Arts in Education Service - School Evaluations <strong>2011</strong>-<strong>2012</strong><br />
Page 208 of 332
ARTIST: MARISABINA RUSSO STARK dba MARIS<br />
CONTRACT #: A8851<br />
TITLE OF PROGRAM: AUTHOR/ILLUSTRATOR VISIT<br />
TYPE OF PROGRAM: RESIDENCY<br />
DISTRICT/ SCHOOL: PUTNAM VALLEY/PUTNAM VALLEY ELEM.<br />
# OF TEACHERS: 6<br />
# OF STUDENTS: 300 GRADE(S) 1 & 2<br />
DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 5/16-18/12<br />
NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />
STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 X STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />
ARTIST: MARISABINA RUSSO STARK dba MARIS CONTRACT #: A7607<br />
TITLE OF PROGRAM: AUTHOR/ILLUSTRATOR VISIT<br />
TYPE OF PROGRAM: ASSEMBLY<br />
DISTRICT/ SCHOOL: HENDRICK HUDSON/FURNACE WOODS ELEM.<br />
# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />
# OF STUDENTS: 41 GRADE(S) K<br />
DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 1/18/12<br />
NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />
STANDARD 1 STANDARD 2 STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />
1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />
1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />
1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />
2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />
3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />
4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />
5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />
6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />
2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />
3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />
4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />
5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />
6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />
TEACHERS LOVED HER SOFT SPOKEN, GENTLE WAY WITH THE<br />
CHILDREN. VERY ENGAGING.<br />
8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />
NONE<br />
9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />
NONE<br />
7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM?<br />
NONE<br />
8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />
NONE<br />
9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />
NONE<br />
Y<br />
WHY?<br />
ARTIST: MARJORIE J. HALL<br />
CONTRACT #: A8228A<br />
TITLE OF PROGRAM: ARTS & CRAFTS / CRAFTY KIDS<br />
TYPE OF PROGRAM: WORKSHOP<br />
DISTRICT/ SCHOOL: KATONAH/LEWISBORO/INCREASE MILLER ELEM.<br />
# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />
# OF STUDENTS: 7 GRADE(S) K-2<br />
DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 1/18-3/14/12<br />
NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />
STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 X STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />
ARTIST: MARJORIE J. HALL<br />
CONTRACT #: A8717B<br />
TITLE OF PROGRAM: FAIRY WORLD CRAFTS<br />
TYPE OF PROGRAM: WORKSHOP<br />
DISTRICT/ SCHOOL: KATONAH/LEWISBORO/INCREASE MILLER ELEM.<br />
# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />
# OF STUDENTS: 11 GRADE(S) K-2<br />
DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 4/12-5/31/12<br />
NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />
STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 X STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />
1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />
1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />
1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />
2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />
3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />
4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />
5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />
6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />
7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />
MARCY IS SO CREATIVE. SHE OFFERS DIFFERENT PROJECTS<br />
EVERY CLASS.<br />
8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />
N0NE<br />
9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />
NONE<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
N/<br />
5<br />
1.<br />
2.<br />
3.<br />
4.<br />
5.<br />
6.<br />
STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />
ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />
EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />
ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />
TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />
QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
N/<br />
5<br />
7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />
WE ARE SO LUCKY TO HAVE MARCY TEACHING AT OUR SCHOOL.<br />
SHE IS A REAL NATURAL WITH STUDENTS AND SHE IS<br />
WONDERFULLY CREATIVE.<br />
8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />
NONE<br />
9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />
NONE<br />
Arts in Education Service - School Evaluations <strong>2011</strong>-<strong>2012</strong><br />
Page 209 of 332
ARTIST: MARK BARDEN<br />
CONTRACT #: A8457<br />
TITLE OF PROGRAM: GUITAR PLAYER FOR THE SHOW - THIRTEEN<br />
COLONIES<br />
TYPE OF PROGRAM: ASSEMBLY<br />
DISTRICT/ SCHOOL: NEW ROCHELLE/DANIEL WEBSTER ELEM.<br />
# OF TEACHERS: 4<br />
# OF STUDENTS: 90 GRADE(S) 2<br />
DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 2/13-15/12<br />
NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />
STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />
1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />
ARTIST: MARK KISTLER<br />
CONTRACT #: A7527<br />
TITLE OF PROGRAM: IMAGINATION STATION SHOW<br />
TYPE OF PROGRAM: ASSEMBLY<br />
DISTRICT/ SCHOOL:<br />
# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />
LAKELAND/VAN CORT ELEM.<br />
# OF STUDENTS: 475 GRADE(S) K-5<br />
DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 11/29/11<br />
NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />
STANDARD 1 STANDARD 2 STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />
1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />
1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />
2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />
3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />
4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />
5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />
6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />
7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />
NONE<br />
8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />
NONE<br />
9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />
NONE<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
1.<br />
2.<br />
3.<br />
4.<br />
5.<br />
6.<br />
STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />
ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />
EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />
ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />
TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />
QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />
WE WOULD HIGHLY RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM TO ANYONE THAT<br />
WANTS TO ENRICH THEIR ART PROGRAM.<br />
8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />
NONE.<br />
9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />
YOUR PROGRAM IS INTERACTIVE AND DYNAMIC. WELL DONE.<br />
ARTIST: MARK KUSHNIR<br />
CONTRACT #: A8563<br />
TITLE OF PROGRAM: VIOLIN PLAYER FOR THE SHOW - BEAUTY AND THE<br />
BEAST<br />
TYPE OF PROGRAM: ASSEMBLY<br />
DISTRICT/ SCHOOL: PLEASANTVILLE/PLEASANTVILLE HIGH SCHOOL<br />
# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />
# OF STUDENTS: 400 GRADE(S) 9-12<br />
DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 3/9-17/12<br />
NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />
STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />
1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />
ARTIST: MARVIN NOVOGRODSKI<br />
CONTRACT #: A7731<br />
TITLE OF PROGRAM: MAGIC OF SCIENCE SHOW<br />
TYPE OF PROGRAM: ASSEMBLY<br />
DISTRICT/ SCHOOL: EASTCHESTER/EASTCHESTER MIDDLE SCHOOL<br />
# OF TEACHERS: 10 # OF STUDENTS: 240 GRADE(S) 6<br />
DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 2/8/12<br />
NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />
STANDARD 1 STANDARD 2 STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />
1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />
1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />
2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />
3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />
4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />
5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />
6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />
7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />
PROFESSIONAL MUSIC QUALITY.<br />
8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />
NONE<br />
9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />
VERY PLEASANT ARTIST TO WORK WITH.<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
N/<br />
1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />
2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />
3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />
4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />
5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />
6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />
7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />
NONE<br />
8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />
NONE<br />
9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />
GREAT SHOW AS USUAL. MARVIN IS ALWAYS VERY RESPONSIVE<br />
TO OUR STUDENTS.<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
Arts in Education Service - School Evaluations <strong>2011</strong>-<strong>2012</strong><br />
Page 210 of 332
ARTIST: MARY DEE MERRELL<br />
CONTRACT #: A8793<br />
TITLE OF PROGRAM: LETS MAKE BOOKS<br />
TYPE OF PROGRAM: RESIDENCY<br />
DISTRICT/ SCHOOL: NEW ROCHELLE/TRINITY ELEM. SCHOOL<br />
# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />
# OF STUDENTS: 175 GRADE(S) 5<br />
DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 5/30-6/14/12<br />
NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />
STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 X STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />
1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />
ARTIST: MARY ELLEN SHEPLEY<br />
CONTRACT #: A8516<br />
TITLE OF PROGRAM: FLUTE & PICCALO PLAYER FOR THE SHOW - BEAUTY<br />
AND THE BEAST<br />
TYPE OF PROGRAM: ASSEMBLY<br />
DISTRICT/ SCHOOL: PLEASANTVILLE/PLEASANTVILLE HIGH SCHOOL<br />
# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />
# OF STUDENTS: 400 GRADE(S) 9-12<br />
DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 3/9-17/12<br />
NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />
STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />
1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />
1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />
2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />
3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />
4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />
5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />
6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />
7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />
SHE IS A WONDERFUL TEACHING ARTIST.<br />
8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />
NONE<br />
9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />
NONE<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
1.<br />
2.<br />
3.<br />
4.<br />
5.<br />
6.<br />
STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />
ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />
EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />
ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />
TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />
QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />
A GREAT SUPPORT FOR KEEPING THE ARTS ALIVE IN EDUCATION.<br />
8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />
NONE<br />
9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />
NONE<br />
ARTIST: MARYGRACE KILLIP<br />
CONTRACT #: A8601<br />
TITLE OF PROGRAM: MIXED MEDIA ART<br />
TYPE OF PROGRAM: WORKSHOP<br />
DISTRICT/ SCHOOL: EASTCHESTER/GREENVALE ELEM.<br />
# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />
# OF STUDENTS: 8 GRADE(S) 3-5<br />
DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 3/9-5/18/12<br />
NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />
STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 X STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />
ARTIST: MARYGRACE KILLIP<br />
CONTRACT #: A7666<br />
TITLE OF PROGRAM: MIXED MEDIA ART<br />
TYPE OF PROGRAM: WORKSHOP<br />
DISTRICT/ SCHOOL: EASTCHESTER/GREENVALE ELEM.<br />
# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />
# OF STUDENTS: 10 GRADE(S) 3-5<br />
DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 10/21-12/16/11<br />
NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />
STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 X STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />
1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />
1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />
1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />
2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />
3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />
4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />
5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />
6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />
2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />
3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />
4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />
5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />
6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
N/<br />
7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM?<br />
NONE<br />
8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />
NONE<br />
9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />
NONE<br />
Y<br />
WHY?<br />
7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />
SHE IS A WONDERFUL TEACHER. CHILDREN FLOURISH IN THIS<br />
CLASS.<br />
8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />
NONE<br />
9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />
AWESOME.<br />
Arts in Education Service - School Evaluations <strong>2011</strong>-<strong>2012</strong><br />
Page 211 of 332
ARTIST: MATTHEW FABLE<br />
CONTRACT #: A8566<br />
TITLE OF PROGRAM: SOUND TECHNICIAN OR THE SHOW - ONCE UPON A<br />
MATTRESS<br />
TYPE OF PROGRAM: RESIDENCY<br />
DISTRICT/ SCHOOL:<br />
# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />
SOMERS/SOMERS HIGH SCHOOL<br />
# OF STUDENTS: GRADE(S) 9-12<br />
DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 3/12-18/12<br />
NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />
STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 X STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />
1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />
ARTIST: MATTHEW HILGENBERG<br />
CONTRACT #: A8680<br />
TITLE OF PROGRAM: TRUMPET PLAYER FOR THE SHOW - GUYS & DOLLS<br />
TYPE OF PROGRAM: ASSEMBLY<br />
DISTRICT/ SCHOOL: KATONAH/LEWISBORO/JOHN JAY HIGH SCHOOL<br />
# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />
# OF STUDENTS: 150 GRADE(S) 9-12<br />
DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 3/22-24/12<br />
NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />
STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />
1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />
1.<br />
2.<br />
3.<br />
4.<br />
5.<br />
6.<br />
STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />
ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />
EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />
ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />
TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />
QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />
2<br />
2<br />
2<br />
2<br />
2<br />
2<br />
7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />
CONTRACTED FOR RUNNING SOUND FOR ALL REHEARSALS AND<br />
PERFORMANCES. THERE WERE PROBLEMS WITH THE SOUND SET<br />
UP THAT WAS NOT CORRECTED UNTIL THE 3RD DAY.<br />
8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />
NONE<br />
9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />
NONE<br />
1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />
2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />
3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />
4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />
5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />
6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />
7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />
NONE<br />
8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />
NONE<br />
9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />
NONE<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
ARTIST: MATTHEW KOWALSKI<br />
CONTRACT #: A7716<br />
TITLE OF PROGRAM: REED PLAYER FOR THE SHOW - ANNIE GET YOUR<br />
GUN<br />
TYPE OF PROGRAM: ASSEMBLY<br />
DISTRICT/ SCHOOL: LAKELAND/WALTER PANAS HIGH SCHOOL<br />
# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />
# OF STUDENTS: 100 GRADE(S) 9-12<br />
DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 11/14-19/11<br />
NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />
STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />
1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />
ARTIST: MATTHEW KOWALSKI<br />
CONTRACT #: A8336<br />
TITLE OF PROGRAM: REED PLAYER FOR THE SHOW - MY FAIR LADY<br />
TYPE OF PROGRAM: ASSEMBLY<br />
DISTRICT/ SCHOOL: LAKELAND/WALTER PANAS HIGH SCHOOL<br />
# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />
# OF STUDENTS: 200 GRADE(S) 9-12<br />
DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 4/30-5/5/12<br />
NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />
STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />
1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />
1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />
2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />
3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />
4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />
5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />
6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />
7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />
A PLEASURE TO HAVE MATT ON BOARD.<br />
8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />
NONE<br />
9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />
NONE<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />
2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />
3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />
4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />
5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />
6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />
7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />
NONE<br />
8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />
NONE<br />
9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />
NONE<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
Arts in Education Service - School Evaluations <strong>2011</strong>-<strong>2012</strong><br />
Page 212 of 332
ARTIST: MATTHEW QUAYLE<br />
CONTRACT #: A8437<br />
TITLE OF PROGRAM: MUSICAL DIRECTOR FOR THE SHOW - A FUNNY<br />
THING HAPPENED ON THE WAY TO THE FORUM<br />
TYPE OF PROGRAM: RESIDENCY<br />
DISTRICT/ SCHOOL: PUTNAM VALLEY/PUTNAM VALLEY HIGH SCHOOL<br />
# OF TEACHERS: 3<br />
# OF STUDENTS: 400 GRADE(S) 9-12<br />
DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 3/3-4/23/12<br />
NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />
STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 X STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />
1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />
ARTIST: MEET THE MUSCIANS, L.L.C.<br />
CONTRACT #: A7937<br />
TITLE OF PROGRAM: DENNIS KOBRAY - BEETHOVEN<br />
TYPE OF PROGRAM: ASSEMBLY<br />
DISTRICT/ SCHOOL: LAKELAND/GEORGE WASHINGTON ELEM.<br />
# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />
# OF STUDENTS: 500 GRADE(S) K-5<br />
DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 3/15/12<br />
NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />
STANDARD 1 STANDARD 2 STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4 X<br />
1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />
1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />
2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />
3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />
4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />
5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />
6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />
7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />
NONE<br />
8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />
NONE<br />
9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />
NONE<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
N/<br />
1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />
2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />
3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />
4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />
5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />
6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />
7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />
HE IS TERRIFIC.<br />
8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />
NONE<br />
9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />
THE CHILDREN REALLY LOOK FORWARD TO HIS PERFORMANCE.<br />
BRAVO.<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
ARTIST: MEET THE MUSCIANS, L.L.C.<br />
CONTRACT #: A7513<br />
TITLE OF PROGRAM: DENNIS KOBRAY - BRAHMS<br />
TYPE OF PROGRAM: ASSEMBLY<br />
DISTRICT/ SCHOOL:<br />
# OF TEACHERS: 5<br />
CHAPPAQUA/GRAFFLIN ELEM.<br />
# OF STUDENTS: 125 GRADE(S) K-4<br />
DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 11/18/11<br />
NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />
STANDARD 1 STANDARD 2 STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4 X<br />
ARTIST: MEET THE MUSCIANS, L.L.C.<br />
CONTRACT #: A7513<br />
TITLE OF PROGRAM: DENNIS KOBRAY - BRAHMS<br />
TYPE OF PROGRAM: ASSEMBLY<br />
DISTRICT/ SCHOOL:<br />
# OF TEACHERS: 5<br />
CHAPPAQUA/GRAFFLIN ELEM.<br />
# OF STUDENTS: 125 GRADE(S) 1<br />
DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 11/18/11<br />
NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />
STANDARD 1 STANDARD 2 STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4 X<br />
1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />
1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />
1.<br />
2.<br />
3.<br />
4.<br />
5.<br />
6.<br />
STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />
ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />
EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />
ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />
TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />
QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />
2<br />
2<br />
3<br />
2<br />
3<br />
N/<br />
7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />
THIS PROGRAM IS NORMALLY VERY GOOD. MAYBE IT WAS THE<br />
CHOICE OF MUSICIAN, BUT THE STUDENTS WERE NOT ENGAGED<br />
AS THEY NORMALLY ARE.<br />
8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />
USING MULTI MEDIA.<br />
9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />
NONE<br />
1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />
2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />
3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />
4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />
5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />
6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />
7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />
WE HAVE MIXED FEELINGS ABOUT THIS ASSEMBLY. SOME OF US<br />
FOUND IT EDUCATIONAL AND INTERESTING. SOME PEOPLE<br />
THOUGHT IT WENT OVER THE KIDS HEADS.<br />
8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />
PLEASE ASK FOR ADVICE ABOUT WHICH COMPOSER WOULD BE<br />
MOST APPROPRIATE FOR PRIMARY STUDENTS.<br />
9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />
SOME TEACHERS FELT THAT THESE COMPOSERS DIDN'T HAVE<br />
INTERESTING ENOUGH LIVES TO ENGAGE THE STUDENTS.<br />
3<br />
4<br />
4<br />
3<br />
4<br />
N/<br />
Arts in Education Service - School Evaluations <strong>2011</strong>-<strong>2012</strong><br />
Page 213 of 332
ARTIST: MEET THE MUSCIANS, L.L.C.<br />
CONTRACT #: A7513<br />
TITLE OF PROGRAM: DENNIS KOBRAY - BRAHMS<br />
TYPE OF PROGRAM: ASSEMBLY<br />
DISTRICT/ SCHOOL:<br />
# OF TEACHERS: 5<br />
CHAPPAQUA/GRAFFLIN ELEM.<br />
# OF STUDENTS: 104 GRADE(S) 3<br />
DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 11/18/11<br />
NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />
STANDARD 1 STANDARD 2 STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4 X<br />
ARTIST: MEET THE MUSCIANS, L.L.C.<br />
CONTRACT #: A7513<br />
TITLE OF PROGRAM: DENNIS KOBRAY - BRAHMS<br />
TYPE OF PROGRAM: ASSEMBLY<br />
DISTRICT/ SCHOOL:<br />
# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />
CHAPPAQUA/GRAFFLIN ELEM.<br />
# OF STUDENTS: 75 GRADE(S) K-4<br />
DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 11/18/11<br />
NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />
STANDARD 1 STANDARD 2 STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4 X<br />
1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />
1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />
1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />
2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />
3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />
4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />
5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />
6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />
4<br />
4<br />
4<br />
4<br />
5<br />
N/<br />
1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />
2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />
3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />
4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />
5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />
6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />
3<br />
5<br />
4<br />
3<br />
4<br />
N/<br />
7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y<br />
VERY ENGAGING AND INTERESTING FOR STUDENTS.<br />
WHY?<br />
7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM?<br />
INVENTIVE, ENTERTAINING AND INFORMATIVE.<br />
Y<br />
WHY?<br />
8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />
NONE<br />
9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />
NONE<br />
8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />
THIS PARTICULAR MUSICIAN WAS NOT QUITE AS ENGAGING AS<br />
SOME OTHER MUSICIANS WE'VE SEEN BASED ON STUDENT<br />
REACTION.<br />
9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />
WE STILL LOVE THIS PROGRAM.<br />
ARTIST: MEET THE MUSCIANS, L.L.C.<br />
CONTRACT #: A7513<br />
TITLE OF PROGRAM: DENNIS KOBRAY - BRAHMS<br />
TYPE OF PROGRAM: ASSEMBLY<br />
DISTRICT/ SCHOOL:<br />
# OF TEACHERS: 4<br />
CHAPPAQUA/GRAFFLIN ELEM.<br />
# OF STUDENTS: 100 GRADE(S) 2<br />
DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 11/18/11<br />
NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />
STANDARD 1 STANDARD 2 STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4 X<br />
ARTIST: MEET THE MUSCIANS, L.L.C.<br />
CONTRACT #: A8828<br />
TITLE OF PROGRAM: DENNIS KOBRAY - MOZART<br />
TYPE OF PROGRAM: ASSEMBLY<br />
DISTRICT/ SCHOOL: PUTNAM VALLEY/PUTNAM VALLEY ELEM.<br />
# OF TEACHERS: 5<br />
# OF STUDENTS: 400 GRADE(S) K-3<br />
DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 5/22/12<br />
NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />
STANDARD 1 STANDARD 2 STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4 X<br />
1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />
1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />
1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />
2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />
3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />
4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />
5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />
6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />
4<br />
5<br />
5<br />
4<br />
5<br />
5<br />
1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />
2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />
3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />
4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />
5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />
6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />
4<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
N/<br />
7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM?<br />
ORGANIZED, INFORMATIVE.<br />
8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />
NONE<br />
9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />
WE ALL ENJOYED IT.<br />
Y<br />
WHY?<br />
7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />
DENNIS IS NOT ONLY AN AMAZING MUSICIAN BUT A GREAT<br />
STORYTELLER.<br />
8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />
FOR THE LITTLE ONES - PROGRAM COULD BE A BIT SHORTER.<br />
9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />
NONE<br />
Arts in Education Service - School Evaluations <strong>2011</strong>-<strong>2012</strong><br />
Page 214 of 332
ARTIST: MEET THE MUSCIANS, L.L.C.<br />
CONTRACT #: A7882<br />
TITLE OF PROGRAM: DENNIS KOBRAY - STEPHEN FOSTER<br />
TYPE OF PROGRAM: ASSEMBLY<br />
DISTRICT/ SCHOOL:<br />
# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />
BRIARCLIFF/TODD ELEM.<br />
# OF STUDENTS: 350 GRADE(S) 3-5<br />
DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 1/9/12<br />
NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />
STANDARD 1 STANDARD 2 STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4 X<br />
1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />
ARTIST: MEGAN PATRONA<br />
CONTRACT #: A8025<br />
TITLE OF PROGRAM: CONTEMPORARY BOLLYWOOD DANCING FOR JAZZ<br />
CO<br />
TYPE OF PROGRAM: WORKSHOP<br />
DISTRICT/ SCHOOL: TUCKAHOE/TUCKAHOE HIGH SCHOOL<br />
# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />
# OF STUDENTS: 60 GRADE(S) 9-12<br />
DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 11/28/11-3/3/12<br />
NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />
STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 X STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4 X<br />
1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />
1.<br />
2.<br />
3.<br />
4.<br />
5.<br />
6.<br />
STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />
ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />
EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />
ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />
TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />
QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />
DENNIS' PRESENTATION IS SUPERB IN EVERY WAY. ENTERTAINING<br />
AND INFORMATIVE. POLISHED AND PROFESSIONAL.<br />
8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />
NONE<br />
9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />
SUPERB. EXCELLENT. ENGAGING.<br />
1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />
2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />
3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />
4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />
5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />
6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />
7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />
DANCE IS EDUCATIONAL, CULTURAL AND FUN.<br />
8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />
NONE<br />
9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />
NONE<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
N/<br />
ARTIST: MELISSA CASTIGNOLI<br />
CONTRACT #: A8720<br />
TITLE OF PROGRAM: MIXED MEDIA ABSTRACT ARTIST<br />
TYPE OF PROGRAM: WORKSHOP<br />
DISTRICT/ SCHOOL: NEW ROCHELLE/NEW ROCHELLE HS<br />
# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />
# OF STUDENTS: 110 GRADE(S) 9-12<br />
DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 3/30/12<br />
NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />
STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 X STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />
ARTIST: MELISSA HEALY BAKER<br />
CONTRACT #: A8508<br />
TITLE OF PROGRAM: FLUTE PLAYER FOR THE SHOW - AIDA<br />
TYPE OF PROGRAM: ASSEMBLY<br />
DISTRICT/ SCHOOL: OSSINING/OSSINING HIGH SCHOOL<br />
# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />
# OF STUDENTS: GRADE(S) 9-12<br />
DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 3/19-24/12<br />
NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />
STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />
1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />
1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />
1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />
2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />
3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />
4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />
5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />
6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />
7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />
MELISSA WAS VERY KNOWLEDGEABLE OF HER CRAFT AND WAS<br />
WONDERFUL WITH THE STUDENTS.<br />
8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />
IN TIME AND WITH MORE EXPERIENCE, I AM SURE SHE WILL BE A<br />
PRO AT PRESENTING AND DEMONSTRATING TO A CROWD.<br />
9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />
NONE<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
1.<br />
2.<br />
3.<br />
4.<br />
5.<br />
6.<br />
STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />
ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />
EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />
ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />
TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />
QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />
MELISSA WAS AN INCREDIBLE ASSET TO OUR PRODUCTION. HER<br />
MUSICIANSHIP IS EXCEPTIONAL.<br />
8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />
NONE<br />
9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />
WE ARE SO FORTUNATE TO HAVE HAD MELISSA PERFORM IN OUR<br />
PRODUCTION.<br />
Arts in Education Service - School Evaluations <strong>2011</strong>-<strong>2012</strong><br />
Page 215 of 332
ARTIST: MELISSA LIETO<br />
CONTRACT #: A7861A<br />
TITLE OF PROGRAM: HIP HOP & TAP I<br />
TYPE OF PROGRAM: WORKSHOP<br />
DISTRICT/ SCHOOL: EASTCHESTER/EASTCHESTER HIGH SCHOOL<br />
# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />
# OF STUDENTS: GRADE(S) 9-12<br />
DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 11/2/11-1/18/12<br />
NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />
STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 X STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4 X<br />
ARTIST: MELISSA LIETO<br />
CONTRACT #: A7861B<br />
TITLE OF PROGRAM: HIP HOP & TAP II<br />
TYPE OF PROGRAM: WORKSHOP<br />
DISTRICT/ SCHOOL: EASTCHESTER/EASTCHESTER HIGH SCHOOL<br />
# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />
# OF STUDENTS: GRADE(S) 9-12<br />
DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 11/3/11-1/19/12<br />
NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />
STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 X STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4 X<br />
1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />
1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />
1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />
2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />
3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />
4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />
5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />
6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />
2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />
3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />
4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />
5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />
6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM?<br />
NONE<br />
Y<br />
WHY?<br />
7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM?<br />
NONE<br />
Y<br />
WHY?<br />
8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />
NONE<br />
9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />
NONE<br />
8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />
NONE<br />
9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />
NONE<br />
ARTIST: MELISSA LIETO<br />
CONTRACT #: A7861C<br />
TITLE OF PROGRAM: HIP HOP & TAP III<br />
TYPE OF PROGRAM: WORKSHOP<br />
DISTRICT/ SCHOOL: EASTCHESTER/EASTCHESTER HIGH SCHOOL<br />
# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />
# OF STUDENTS: GRADE(S) 9-12<br />
DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 11/4/11-1/20/12<br />
NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />
STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 X STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4 X<br />
ARTIST: MELISSA MAGIET<br />
CONTRACT #: A8182<br />
TITLE OF PROGRAM: BOOKS COME ALIVE WITH ART<br />
TYPE OF PROGRAM: WORKSHOP<br />
DISTRICT/ SCHOOL:<br />
# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />
PELHAM/HUTCHINSON ELEM.<br />
# OF STUDENTS: 10 GRADE(S) 3<br />
DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 1/10-4/5/12<br />
NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />
STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 X STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />
1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />
1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />
1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />
2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />
3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />
4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />
5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />
6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />
2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />
3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />
4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />
5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />
6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />
5<br />
4<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM?<br />
NONE<br />
Y<br />
WHY?<br />
7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM?<br />
NONE<br />
Y<br />
WHY?<br />
8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />
NONE<br />
9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />
NONE<br />
8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />
NONE<br />
9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />
NONE<br />
Arts in Education Service - School Evaluations <strong>2011</strong>-<strong>2012</strong><br />
Page 216 of 332
ARTIST: MICHAEL BUONI<br />
CONTRACT #: A8455<br />
TITLE OF PROGRAM: DANCE<br />
TYPE OF PROGRAM: ASSEMBLY<br />
DISTRICT/ SCHOOL: NEW ROCHELLE/JEFFERSON ELEM.<br />
# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />
# OF STUDENTS: 500 GRADE(S) K-5<br />
DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 1/31-3/15/12<br />
NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />
STANDARD 1 STANDARD 2 STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />
ARTIST: MICHAEL CHERNEY<br />
CONTRACT #: A8712<br />
TITLE OF PROGRAM: CHINESE ART<br />
TYPE OF PROGRAM: ASSEMBLY<br />
DISTRICT/ SCHOOL: BYRAM HILLS/BYRAM HILLS HIGH SCHOOL<br />
# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />
# OF STUDENTS: 100 GRADE(S) 9-12<br />
DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 3/26/12<br />
NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />
STANDARD 1 STANDARD 2 STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4 X<br />
1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />
1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />
1.<br />
2.<br />
3.<br />
4.<br />
5.<br />
6.<br />
STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />
ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />
EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />
ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />
TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />
QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />
MICHAEL IS WONDERFUL. THE CHILDREN WILL STAY INSIDE ON A<br />
SUNNY DAY TO DANCE WITH HIM. WE WILL USE HIM AGAIN NEXT<br />
YEAR.<br />
8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />
NONE<br />
9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />
NONE<br />
1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />
2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />
3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />
4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />
5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />
6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />
7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />
EXCELLENT QUALITY OF WORK.<br />
8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />
MORE INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS.<br />
9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />
NONE<br />
4<br />
5<br />
5<br />
4<br />
4<br />
5<br />
ARTIST: MICHAEL COFFEY<br />
CONTRACT #: A7710<br />
TITLE OF PROGRAM: PERCUSSION PLAYER FOR THE SHOW - ANNIE GET<br />
YOUR GUN<br />
TYPE OF PROGRAM: ASSEMBLY<br />
DISTRICT/ SCHOOL: LAKELAND/WALTER PANAS HIGH SCHOOL<br />
# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />
# OF STUDENTS: 100 GRADE(S) 9-12<br />
DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 11/14-19/11<br />
NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />
STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />
1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />
ARTIST: MICHAEL GRAHAM - SPRING VALLEY PU CONTRACT #: A8630<br />
TITLE OF PROGRAM: JACK & THE BEAN STALK<br />
TYPE OF PROGRAM: ASSEMBLY<br />
DISTRICT/ SCHOOL:<br />
# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />
SOMERS/PRIMROSE ELEM.<br />
# OF STUDENTS: 220 GRADE(S) K<br />
DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 4/24/12<br />
NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />
STANDARD 1 STANDARD 2 STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />
1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />
1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />
2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />
3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />
4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />
5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />
6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />
7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />
NONE<br />
8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />
NONE<br />
9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />
NONE<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
1.<br />
2.<br />
3.<br />
4.<br />
5.<br />
6.<br />
STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />
ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />
EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />
ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />
TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />
QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />
THE STUDENTS WERE ENTRALLED BY THE PERFORMANCE. THEY<br />
LOVED SEEING THE BEHIND THE SCENES.<br />
8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />
NONE<br />
9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />
NONE<br />
Arts in Education Service - School Evaluations <strong>2011</strong>-<strong>2012</strong><br />
Page 217 of 332
ARTIST: MICHAEL GRAHAM - SPRING VALLEY PU CONTRACT #: A8077A<br />
TITLE OF PROGRAM: JACK & THE BEAN STALK<br />
TYPE OF PROGRAM: ASSEMBLY<br />
DISTRICT/ SCHOOL:<br />
# OF TEACHERS: 4<br />
LAKELAND/LINCOLN-TITUS ELEM.<br />
# OF STUDENTS: 84 GRADE(S) K<br />
DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 12/12/11<br />
NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />
STANDARD 1 STANDARD 2 STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />
ARTIST: MICHAEL GRAHAM - SPRING VALLEY PU CONTRACT #: A7698<br />
TITLE OF PROGRAM: JACK & THE BEAN STALK<br />
TYPE OF PROGRAM: ASSEMBLY<br />
DISTRICT/ SCHOOL: CHAPPAQUA/ROARING BROOK ELEM.<br />
# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />
# OF STUDENTS: 100 GRADE(S) K<br />
DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 3/2/12<br />
NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />
STANDARD 1 STANDARD 2 STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />
1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />
1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />
1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />
2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />
3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />
4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />
5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />
6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />
7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />
MICHAEL ALWAYS KEEPS THE STUDENTS ENGAGED THE ENTIRE<br />
TIME. THEY ARE TRULY AMAZED TO SEE HOW HE MAKES THE<br />
PUPPETS WORK AT THE END.<br />
8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />
NONE<br />
9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />
EACH YEAR I AM AMAZED AT SOME OF THE QUESTIONS FROM THE<br />
STUDENTS.<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />
2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />
3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />
4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />
5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />
6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />
7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />
MICHAEL GAVE A WONDERFUL RENDITION OF JACK AND THE<br />
BEANSTALK. HE KEPT THE STUDENTS ENGAGED.<br />
8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />
THE SHOW COULD BE SHORTENED A BIT.<br />
9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />
NONE<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
N/<br />
ARTIST: MICHAEL GRAHAM - SPRING VALLEY PU CONTRACT #: A7807<br />
TITLE OF PROGRAM: JACK & THE BEAN STALK<br />
TYPE OF PROGRAM: ASSEMBLY<br />
DISTRICT/ SCHOOL: CHAPPAQUA/WESTORCHARD ELEM.<br />
# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />
# OF STUDENTS: 90 GRADE(S) K<br />
DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 2/3/12<br />
NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />
STANDARD 1 STANDARD 2 STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />
ARTIST: MICHAEL GRAHAM - SPRING VALLEY PU CONTRACT #: A8077B<br />
TITLE OF PROGRAM: WOLF IN SHEEPS CLOTHING & 3 WISHES<br />
TYPE OF PROGRAM: ASSEMBLY<br />
DISTRICT/ SCHOOL:<br />
# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />
LAKELAND/LINCOLN-TITUS ELEM.<br />
# OF STUDENTS: 71 GRADE(S) 1<br />
DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 12/13/11<br />
NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />
STANDARD 1 STANDARD 2 STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />
1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />
1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />
1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />
2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />
3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />
4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />
5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />
6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />
2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />
3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />
4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />
5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />
6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM?<br />
GREAT SHOW.<br />
8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />
NONE<br />
9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />
NONE<br />
Y<br />
WHY?<br />
7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />
THE STUDENTS THOROUGHLY ENJOYED THE PERFORMANCE.<br />
THEY WERE FAMILIAR WITH HIS WORK FROM LAST YEAR.<br />
8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />
NONE<br />
9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />
WE WOULD LOVE TO HAVE HIM COME BACK NEXT YEAR.<br />
Arts in Education Service - School Evaluations <strong>2011</strong>-<strong>2012</strong><br />
Page 218 of 332
ARTIST: MICHAEL HARROLD<br />
CONTRACT #: A7904<br />
TITLE OF PROGRAM: EGYPT - A MULTI CULTURAL JOURNEY<br />
TYPE OF PROGRAM: ASSEMBLY/WORKSHOP<br />
DISTRICT/ SCHOOL: YORKTOWN/MILDRED STRANG MIDDLE SCHOOL<br />
# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />
# OF STUDENTS: 100 GRADE(S) 6<br />
DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 11/21/11<br />
NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />
STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 X STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4 X<br />
ARTIST: MICHAEL HARROLD<br />
CONTRACT #: A8385<br />
TITLE OF PROGRAM: EGYPT - A MULTI-CULTURAL JOURNEY<br />
TYPE OF PROGRAM: ASSEMBLY/WORKSHOP<br />
DISTRICT/ SCHOOL: NEW ROCHELLE/COLUMBUS ELEM.<br />
# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />
# OF STUDENTS: 400 GRADE(S) K-5<br />
DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 3/8/12<br />
NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />
STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 X STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4 X<br />
1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />
1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />
1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />
2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />
3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />
4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />
5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />
6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />
7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />
ENGAGING, ENTERTAINING, EDUCATIONAL, INTERESTING,<br />
SATISFYING EXPERIENCE.<br />
8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />
SHOW MORE ARTIFACTS, ASK FOR MORE VOLUNTEERS, LONGER<br />
TIME WITH ARTIFACTS.<br />
9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />
FELT IT WAS REALLY GOOD.<br />
ARTIST: MICHAEL HARROLD<br />
CONTRACT #: A8012<br />
TITLE OF PROGRAM: EGYPT - A MULTI-CULTURAL JOURNEY<br />
TYPE OF PROGRAM: ASSEMBLY/WORKSHOP<br />
DISTRICT/ SCHOOL:<br />
# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />
MTP/WESTLAKE MIDDLE SCHOOL<br />
# OF STUDENTS: 160 GRADE(S) 6<br />
DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 1/9/12<br />
NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />
STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 X STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4 X<br />
5<br />
5<br />
4<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />
2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />
3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />
4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />
5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />
6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />
7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />
HIS PRESENTATIONS ARE ALWAYS HIGHLY ENGAGING FOR THE<br />
CHILDREN. STUDENTS GO ON A VISUAL VIRTUAL TRIP TO<br />
ANOTHER COUNTRY AND COME BACK WITH A BETTER<br />
UNDERSTANDING OF ITS PEOPLE AND CULTURE.<br />
8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />
NONE<br />
9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />
OUR STUDENTS ALWAYS ENJOY HIS VISITS. THEY GET TO HANDLE<br />
THE ARTIFACTS THAT HE BRINGS AND INTERACT WITH HIM.<br />
ARTIST: MICHAEL HARROLD<br />
CONTRACT #: A7761<br />
TITLE OF PROGRAM: EGYPT - A MULTI-CULTURAL JOURNEY<br />
TYPE OF PROGRAM: ASSEMBLY/WORKSHOP<br />
DISTRICT/ SCHOOL:<br />
EASTCHESTER/EASTCHESTER MIDDLE SCHOOL<br />
# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />
# OF STUDENTS: 240 GRADE(S) 6<br />
DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 1/5/12<br />
NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />
STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 X STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4 X<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
N/<br />
1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />
1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />
1.<br />
2.<br />
3.<br />
4.<br />
5.<br />
6.<br />
STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />
ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />
EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />
ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />
TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />
QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />
MICHAEL HAS A UNIQUE WAY OF DELIVERING INFORMATION THAT<br />
ONLY EXPERIENCE CAN ATTAIN. HIS FIRST HAND KNOWLEDGE OF<br />
CULTURE IS PRICELESS.<br />
8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />
NONE<br />
9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />
MICHAEL DELIVERED AN EXCELLENT PRESENTATION. THE<br />
STUDENTS REALLY LEARNED A LOT AND ENJOYED HIS SHOW.<br />
1.<br />
2.<br />
3.<br />
4.<br />
5.<br />
6.<br />
STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />
ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />
EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />
ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />
TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />
QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />
THIS IS AN INTERACTIVE HANDS ON PRESENTATION. IT MAKES<br />
CONNECTIONS FROM PAST TO PRESENT. TEACHES ABOUT OTHER<br />
CULTURES AND TOLERANCE.<br />
8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />
NONE<br />
9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />
NONE<br />
Arts in Education Service - School Evaluations <strong>2011</strong>-<strong>2012</strong><br />
Page 219 of 332
ARTIST: MICHAEL HARROLD<br />
CONTRACT #: A7806A<br />
TITLE OF PROGRAM: EGYPT - A MULTI-CULTURAL JOURNEY<br />
TYPE OF PROGRAM: ASSEMBLY/WORKSHOP<br />
DISTRICT/ SCHOOL: CHAPPAQUA/BELL MIDDLE SCHOOL<br />
# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />
# OF STUDENTS: 180 GRADE(S) 6<br />
DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 12/2/11<br />
NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />
STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 X STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4 X<br />
ARTIST: MICHAEL HARROLD<br />
CONTRACT #: A7806B<br />
TITLE OF PROGRAM: EGYPT - A MULTI-CULTURAL JOURNEY<br />
TYPE OF PROGRAM: ASSEMBLY/WORKSHOP<br />
DISTRICT/ SCHOOL: CHAPPAQUA/SEVEN BRIDGES MIDDLE SCHOOL<br />
# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />
# OF STUDENTS: GRADE(S) 6<br />
DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 12/2/11<br />
NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />
STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 X STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4 X<br />
1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />
1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />
1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />
2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />
3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />
4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />
5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />
6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
N/<br />
N/<br />
1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />
2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />
3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />
4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />
5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />
6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />
MICHAEL HAS BEEN COMING TO BELL FOR SEVEN YEARS. WE<br />
VERY MUCH ENJOY HIS PERFORMANCE.<br />
8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />
NONE<br />
9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />
NONE<br />
7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />
MICHAEL IS A GREAT PRESENTER. HE DOES A SOLID JOB<br />
CONNECTING TO REAL STUDENT INTERESTS.<br />
8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />
NONE<br />
9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />
THANKS. SEE YOU NEXT Y EAR.<br />
ARTIST: MICHAEL HARROLD<br />
CONTRACT #: A7766<br />
TITLE OF PROGRAM: LATIN AMERICA & THE RAIN FOREST SHOW<br />
TYPE OF PROGRAM: ASSEMBLY/WORKSHOP<br />
DISTRICT/ SCHOOL:<br />
# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />
OSSINING/ROOSEVELT<br />
# OF STUDENTS: 340 GRADE(S) 5<br />
DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 10/14/11<br />
NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />
STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 X STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4 X<br />
ARTIST: MICHAEL HARROLD<br />
CONTRACT #: A7953<br />
TITLE OF PROGRAM: THE WORLD - A MULTI-CULTURAL JOURNEY<br />
TYPE OF PROGRAM: ASSEMBLY/WORKSHOP<br />
DISTRICT/ SCHOOL: CHAPPAQUA/WESTORCHARD ELEM.<br />
# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />
# OF STUDENTS: 96 GRADE(S) 3<br />
DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 12/5/11<br />
NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />
STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 X STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4 X<br />
1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />
1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />
1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />
2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />
3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />
4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />
5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />
6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />
4<br />
3<br />
3<br />
3.5<br />
3<br />
3<br />
1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />
2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />
3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />
4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />
5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />
6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
N/<br />
7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM?<br />
MAYBE FOR A SMALLER SETTING.<br />
Y<br />
WHY?<br />
7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM?<br />
NONE<br />
Y<br />
WHY?<br />
8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />
PURCHASE YOUR OWN MICROPHONE AND AMP SET. MORE<br />
INTERACTIVE ACTIVITIES.<br />
9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />
NONE<br />
8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />
NONE<br />
9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />
WE WOULD LOVE TO HAVE HIM BACK NEXT YEAR.<br />
Arts in Education Service - School Evaluations <strong>2011</strong>-<strong>2012</strong><br />
Page 220 of 332
ARTIST: MICHAEL LEE<br />
CONTRACT #: A8644<br />
TITLE OF PROGRAM: BASS PLAYER FOR THE SHOW - A FUNNY THING<br />
HAPPENED ON THE WAY TO THE FORUM<br />
TYPE OF PROGRAM: ASSEMBLY<br />
DISTRICT/ SCHOOL: PUTNAM VALLEY/PUTNAM VALLEY HIGH SCHOOL<br />
# OF TEACHERS: 3<br />
# OF STUDENTS: 400 GRADE(S) 9-12<br />
DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 4/13-23/12<br />
NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />
STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />
ARTIST: MICHAEL MCCARTHY<br />
CONTRACT #: A8562<br />
TITLE OF PROGRAM: FRENCY HORN PLAYER FOR THE SHOW - BEAUTY<br />
AND THE BEAST<br />
TYPE OF PROGRAM: ASSEMBLY<br />
DISTRICT/ SCHOOL: PLEASANTVILLE/PLEASANTVILLE HIGH SCHOOL<br />
# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />
# OF STUDENTS: 400 GRADE(S) 9-12<br />
DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 3/9-17/12<br />
NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />
STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />
1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />
1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />
1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />
2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />
3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />
4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />
5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />
6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />
2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />
3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />
4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />
5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />
6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
N/<br />
7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM?<br />
NONE<br />
Y<br />
WHY?<br />
7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM?<br />
HIGH, PROFESIONAL MUSIC QUALITY.<br />
Y<br />
WHY?<br />
8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />
NONE<br />
9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />
NONE<br />
8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />
NONE<br />
9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />
NONE<br />
ARTIST: MICHAEL MEADE<br />
CONTRACT #: A8511<br />
TITLE OF PROGRAM: CELLO PLAYER FOR THE SHOW - BEAUTY AND THE<br />
BEAST<br />
TYPE OF PROGRAM: ASSEMBLY<br />
DISTRICT/ SCHOOL: PLEASANTVILLE/PLEASANTVILLE HIGH SCHOOL<br />
# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />
# OF STUDENTS: 400 GRADE(S) 9-12<br />
DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 3/9-17/12<br />
NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />
STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />
ARTIST: MICHAEL SOPRANO<br />
CONTRACT #: A8652<br />
TITLE OF PROGRAM: TROMBONE PLAYER FOR THE SHOW - A FUNNY<br />
THING HAPPENED ON THE WAY TO THE FORUM<br />
TYPE OF PROGRAM: ASSEMBLY<br />
DISTRICT/ SCHOOL: PUTNAM VALLEY/PUTNAM VALLEY HIGH SCHOOL<br />
# OF TEACHERS: 3<br />
# OF STUDENTS: 400 GRADE(S) 9-12<br />
DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 4/13-23/12<br />
NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />
STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />
1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />
1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />
1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />
2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />
3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />
4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />
5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />
6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
N/<br />
5<br />
N/<br />
1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />
2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />
3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />
4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />
5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />
6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y<br />
HIGH QUALITY MUSICAL SUPPORT FOR PRODUCTION.<br />
WHY?<br />
7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM?<br />
NONE<br />
Y<br />
WHY?<br />
8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />
NONE<br />
9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />
NONE<br />
8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />
NONE<br />
9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />
NONE<br />
Arts in Education Service - School Evaluations <strong>2011</strong>-<strong>2012</strong><br />
Page 221 of 332
ARTIST: MICHAEL T. LALICKI<br />
CONTRACT #: A8817<br />
TITLE OF PROGRAM: FUNCTIONAL ART<br />
TYPE OF PROGRAM: WORKSHOP<br />
DISTRICT/ SCHOOL: LAKELAND/COPPER BEECH MIDDLE SCHOOL<br />
# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />
# OF STUDENTS: 75 GRADE(S) 8<br />
DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 5/18-30/12<br />
NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />
STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 X STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />
ARTIST: MICHAEL TEATOR<br />
CONTRACT #: A8376<br />
TITLE OF PROGRAM: CARTOONING<br />
TYPE OF PROGRAM: WORKSHOP<br />
DISTRICT/ SCHOOL:<br />
# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />
PELHAM/HUTCHINSON ELEM.<br />
# OF STUDENTS: 12 GRADE(S) 2-5<br />
DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 2/27-4/16/12<br />
NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />
STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 X STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />
1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />
1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />
1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />
2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />
3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />
4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />
5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />
6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />
2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />
3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />
4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />
5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />
6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />
HE HAS A GREAT RAPPORT WITH THE STUDENTS AND IS VERY<br />
PASSIONATE ABOUT HIS WORK.<br />
8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />
NONE<br />
9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />
WAS NICE TO BE ABLE TO SPEND A PERIOD TO CRITIQUE WORK<br />
AND TALK ABOUT THE EXPERIENCE THIS TIME.<br />
7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM?<br />
MICHAEL'S CLASS CONTINUES TO BE POPULAR.<br />
8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />
NONE<br />
9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />
NONE<br />
Y<br />
WHY?<br />
ARTIST: MICHAEL TEATOR<br />
CONTRACT #: A7614<br />
TITLE OF PROGRAM: CARTOONING<br />
TYPE OF PROGRAM: WORKSHOP<br />
DISTRICT/ SCHOOL:<br />
# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />
PELHAM/HUTCHINSON ELEM.<br />
# OF STUDENTS: 12 GRADE(S) 2-5<br />
DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 10/11-11/22/11<br />
NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />
STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 X STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />
ARTIST: MICHAEL TEATOR<br />
CONTRACT #: A7962B<br />
TITLE OF PROGRAM: CARTOONING<br />
TYPE OF PROGRAM: WORKSHOP<br />
DISTRICT/ SCHOOL:<br />
# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />
PELHAM/COLONIAL ELEM.<br />
# OF STUDENTS: GRADE(S) K-2<br />
DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 12/2/11-2/10/12<br />
NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />
STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 X STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />
1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />
1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />
1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />
2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />
3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />
4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />
5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />
6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />
7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />
MICHAEL'S CLASS CONTINUES TO BE A POPULAR CLASS YEAR<br />
AFTER YEAR.<br />
8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />
NONE<br />
9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />
NONE<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
1.<br />
2.<br />
3.<br />
4.<br />
5.<br />
6.<br />
STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />
ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />
EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />
ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />
TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />
QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
N/<br />
N/<br />
7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />
MIKE WAS PATIENT AND ENTHUSIASTIC IN TEACHING CHILDREN<br />
HOW TO DRAW THEIR FAVORITE CARTOONS. THE CHILDREN WERE<br />
ENGAGED AND HAD A WONDERFUL TIME.<br />
8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />
NONE<br />
9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />
NONE<br />
Arts in Education Service - School Evaluations <strong>2011</strong>-<strong>2012</strong><br />
Page 222 of 332
ARTIST: MICHAEL TEATOR<br />
CONTRACT #: A8053A<br />
TITLE OF PROGRAM: CARTOONING I<br />
TYPE OF PROGRAM: WORKSHOP<br />
DISTRICT/ SCHOOL:<br />
# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />
PELHAM/PROSPECT HILL ELEM.<br />
# OF STUDENTS: 21 GRADE(S) 3-5<br />
DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 1/10-3/6/12<br />
NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />
STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 X STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />
ARTIST: MICHAEL TEATOR<br />
CONTRACT #: A8053C<br />
TITLE OF PROGRAM: CARTOONING II<br />
TYPE OF PROGRAM: WORKSHOP<br />
DISTRICT/ SCHOOL:<br />
# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />
PELHAM/PROSPECT HILL ELEM.<br />
# OF STUDENTS: 17 GRADE(S) 1-3<br />
DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 1/12-3/8/12<br />
NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />
STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 X STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />
1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />
1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />
1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />
2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />
3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />
4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />
5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />
6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
N/<br />
1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />
2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />
3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />
4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />
5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />
6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
N/<br />
7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM?<br />
NONE<br />
Y<br />
WHY?<br />
7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM?<br />
NONE<br />
Y<br />
WHY?<br />
8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />
NONE<br />
9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />
NONE<br />
8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />
NONE<br />
9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />
NONE<br />
ARTIST: MICHAEL TEATOR<br />
CONTRACT #: A7962A<br />
TITLE OF PROGRAM: PAINTING<br />
TYPE OF PROGRAM: WORKSHOP<br />
DISTRICT/ SCHOOL:<br />
# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />
PELHAM/COLONIAL ELEM.<br />
# OF STUDENTS: 11 GRADE(S) K-2<br />
DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 11/28/11-2/13/12<br />
NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />
STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 X STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />
ARTIST: MICHAEL TEATOR<br />
CONTRACT #: A8053B<br />
TITLE OF PROGRAM: WATERCOLOR PAINTING<br />
TYPE OF PROGRAM: WORKSHOP<br />
DISTRICT/ SCHOOL:<br />
# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />
PELHAM/PROSPECT HILL ELEM.<br />
# OF STUDENTS: 13 GRADE(S) 3-5<br />
DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 1/11-3/7/12<br />
NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />
STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 X STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />
1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />
1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />
1.<br />
2.<br />
3.<br />
4.<br />
5.<br />
6.<br />
STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />
ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />
EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />
ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />
TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />
QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
N/<br />
N/<br />
7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />
MIKE KEPT THE CHILDREN ENGAGED, FOCUSED AND INTERESTED<br />
WHILE PAINTING NATURE'S WONDERS. THE CHILDREN ENJOYED<br />
THE CLASS AND LEARNED HOW TO HAVE FUN WITH COLORS.<br />
8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />
NONE<br />
9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />
NONE<br />
1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />
2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />
3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />
4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />
5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />
6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />
7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />
NONE<br />
8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />
NONE<br />
9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />
NONE<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
N/<br />
Arts in Education Service - School Evaluations <strong>2011</strong>-<strong>2012</strong><br />
Page 223 of 332
ARTIST: MICHELINGUA, LLC dba LINGUAKIDS CONTRACT #: A7789C<br />
TITLE OF PROGRAM: AUDREY TROCH - SPANISH CULTURE & LANGUAGE<br />
TYPE OF PROGRAM: WORKSHOP<br />
DISTRICT/ SCHOOL: KATONAH/LEWISBORO/MEADOWPOND ELEM.<br />
# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />
# OF STUDENTS: 10 GRADE(S) 2-4<br />
DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 10/12-12/14/11<br />
NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />
STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 X STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4 X<br />
ARTIST: MICHELINGUA, LLC dba LINGUAKIDS CONTRACT #: A7751A<br />
TITLE OF PROGRAM: AUDREY TROCH - SPANISH CULTURE & LANGUAGE<br />
TYPE OF PROGRAM: WORKSHOP<br />
DISTRICT/ SCHOOL:<br />
# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />
PELHAM/COLONIAL ELEM.<br />
# OF STUDENTS: 11 GRADE(S) K-5<br />
DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 11/7/11-3/12/12<br />
NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />
STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 X STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4 X<br />
1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />
1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />
1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />
2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />
3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />
4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />
5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />
6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />
5<br />
4<br />
4<br />
5<br />
4<br />
5<br />
1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />
2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />
3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />
4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />
5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />
6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
4<br />
4<br />
5<br />
7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM?<br />
THE CHILDREN WERE ENGAGED.<br />
Y<br />
WHY?<br />
7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM?<br />
OUTSTANDING PROGRAM.<br />
Y<br />
WHY?<br />
8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />
NONE<br />
9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />
THE STUDENTS RESPONDED WELL TO HER. SEVERAL PARENTS<br />
TOLD ME HOW MUCH THEIR CHILDREN ENJOYED HER CLASS.<br />
8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />
NONE<br />
9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />
NONE<br />
ARTIST: MICHELINGUA, LLC dba LINGUAKIDS CONTRACT #: A7695B<br />
TITLE OF PROGRAM: FLOR SMITH - SPANISH CULTURE & LANGUAGE<br />
TYPE OF PROGRAM: WORKSHOP<br />
DISTRICT/ SCHOOL:<br />
KATONAH/LEWISBORO/LEWISBORO ELEM.<br />
# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />
# OF STUDENTS: 11 GRADE(S) 1 & 5<br />
DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE<br />
10/3-12/16/11<br />
NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />
STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 X STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4 X<br />
1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />
1.<br />
2.<br />
3.<br />
4.<br />
5.<br />
6.<br />
STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />
ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />
EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />
ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />
TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />
QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />
4<br />
4<br />
4<br />
4<br />
4<br />
4<br />
7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />
VERY FLEXIBLE AND GREAT EXPOSURE TO FOREIGN CULTURE AND<br />
LANGUAGE.<br />
8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />
NONE<br />
9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />
NONE<br />
ARTIST: MICHELINGUA, LLC dba LINGUAKIDS CONTRACT #: A8402BC<br />
TITLE OF PROGRAM: LILLIAN VAN DORAN - SPANISH ART, CULTURE &<br />
LANGUAGE<br />
TYPE OF PROGRAM: WORKSHOP<br />
DISTRICT/ SCHOOL:<br />
# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />
PELHAM/HUTCHINSON ELEM.<br />
# OF STUDENTS: 19 GRADE(S) K-5<br />
DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 1/19-5/25/12<br />
NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />
STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 X STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4 X<br />
1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />
1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />
2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />
3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />
4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />
5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />
6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />
7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />
THE COURSE TAUGHT STUDENTS ABOUT A NEW CULTURE AND<br />
LANGUAGE, AND THEY HAVE FUN AT THE SAME TIME. CHILDREN<br />
PERFORM SONGS FROM DIFFERENT CULTURES AND THEY ARE<br />
EXPOSED TO THE VARYING FORMS OF ART AND MUSIC.<br />
8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />
CONSIDER OFFERING INTERMEDIATE AND ADVANCED COURSES<br />
FOR STUDENTS WHO DEMONSTRATE THAT THEY ARE READY FOR<br />
THE NEXT LEVEL.<br />
9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />
SEVERAL PARENTS HAVE EXPRSSED THAT THEIR CHILDREN<br />
ENJOYED THE CLASS.<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
Arts in Education Service - School Evaluations <strong>2011</strong>-<strong>2012</strong><br />
Page 224 of 332
ARTIST: MICHELINGUA, LLC dba LINGUAKIDS CONTRACT #: A8235D<br />
TITLE OF PROGRAM: LILLIAN VAN DORAN & AUDREY TROCH - SPANISH<br />
ART, CULTURE & LANGUAGE<br />
TYPE OF PROGRAM: WORKSHOP<br />
DISTRICT/ SCHOOL:<br />
# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />
PELHAM/PROSPECT HILL ELEM.<br />
# OF STUDENTS: 13 GRADE(S) 1 & 2<br />
DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 1/11-3/21/12<br />
NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />
STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 X STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4 X<br />
ARTIST: MICHELINGUA, LLC dba LINGUAKIDS CONTRACT #: A8401B<br />
TITLE OF PROGRAM: LUZ MARINA FORERO - SPANISH ART, CULTURE &<br />
LANGUAGE<br />
TYPE OF PROGRAM: WORKSHOP<br />
DISTRICT/ SCHOOL: KATONAH/LEWISBORO/LEWISBORO ELEM.<br />
# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />
# OF STUDENTS: 9 GRADE(S) 5<br />
DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 2/6-5/11/12<br />
NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />
STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 X STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4 X<br />
1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />
1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />
1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />
2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />
3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />
4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />
5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />
6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />
2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />
3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />
4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />
5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />
6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />
4<br />
4<br />
4<br />
4<br />
4<br />
4<br />
7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />
ENGAGING FIRST EXPOSURE TO THE FOREIGN CULTURE AND<br />
LANGUAGE THROUGH ART, MUSIC AND LANGUAGE.<br />
8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />
NONE<br />
9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />
NONE<br />
7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM?<br />
EDUCATIONAL AND GREAT TO WORK WITH.<br />
8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />
NONE<br />
9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />
NONE<br />
Y<br />
WHY?<br />
ARTIST: MICHELINGUA, LLC dba LINGUAKIDS CONTRACT #: A7789A<br />
TITLE OF PROGRAM: LUZ MARINA FORERO - SPANISH ART. CULTURE &<br />
LANGUAGE<br />
TYPE OF PROGRAM: WORKSHOP<br />
DISTRICT/ SCHOOL: KATONAH/LEWISBORO/MEADOWPOND ELEM.<br />
# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />
# OF STUDENTS: 9 GRADE(S) 1<br />
DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 10/12-12/14/11<br />
NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />
STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 X STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4 X<br />
ARTIST: MICHELINGUA, LLC dba LINGUAKIDS CONTRACT #: A8402F<br />
TITLE OF PROGRAM: MARIA CIARDIELLO - ITALIAN ART, CULTURE &<br />
LANGUAGE<br />
TYPE OF PROGRAM: WORKSHOP<br />
DISTRICT/ SCHOOL:<br />
# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />
PELHAM/HUTCHINSON ELEM.<br />
# OF STUDENTS: 13 GRADE(S) K-5<br />
DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 1/19-5/25/12<br />
NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />
STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 X STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4 X<br />
1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />
1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />
1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />
2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />
3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />
4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />
5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />
6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />
7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />
I FEEL IT IS IMPORTANT FOR CHILDREN TO HAVE ACCESS TO<br />
FOREIGN LANGUAGE AND CULTURE IN AN ENGAGING<br />
ATMOSPHERE.<br />
8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />
NONE<br />
9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />
NONE<br />
5<br />
4<br />
4<br />
5<br />
4<br />
5<br />
1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />
2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />
3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />
4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />
5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />
6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />
7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />
THE COURSE TAUGHT STUDENTS ABOUT A NEW CULTURE AND<br />
LANGUAGE, AND THEY HAVE FUN AT THE SAME TIME. CHILDREN<br />
PERFORM SONGS FROM DIFFERENT CULTURES AND THEY ARE<br />
EXPOSED TO THE VARYING FORMS OF ART AND MUSIC.<br />
8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />
CONSIDER OFFERING INTERMEDIATE AND ADVANCED COURSES<br />
FOR STUDENTS WHO DEMONSTRATE THAT THEY ARE READY FOR<br />
THE NEXT LEVEL.<br />
9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />
SEVERAL PARENTS HAVE EXPRSSED THAT THEIR CHILDREN<br />
ENJOYED THE CLASS.<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
Arts in Education Service - School Evaluations <strong>2011</strong>-<strong>2012</strong><br />
Page 225 of 332
ARTIST: MICHELINGUA, LLC dba LINGUAKIDS CONTRACT #: A8235C<br />
TITLE OF PROGRAM: MARIA CIARDIELLO - ITALIAN ART, CULTURE &<br />
LANGUAGE<br />
TYPE OF PROGRAM: WORKSHOP<br />
DISTRICT/ SCHOOL:<br />
# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />
PELHAM/PROSPECT HILL ELEM.<br />
# OF STUDENTS: 7 GRADE(S) 1 & 4<br />
DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 1/11-3/21/12<br />
NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />
STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 X STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4 X<br />
ARTIST: MICHELINGUA, LLC dba LINGUAKIDS CONTRACT #: A7753A<br />
TITLE OF PROGRAM: MARIA CIARDIELLO - ITALIAN ART, CULTURE &<br />
LANGUAGE<br />
TYPE OF PROGRAM: WORKSHOP<br />
DISTRICT/ SCHOOL:<br />
# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />
PELHAM/COLONIAL ELEM.<br />
# OF STUDENTS: 9 GRADE(S) K-5<br />
DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 11/7/11-3/12/12<br />
NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />
STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 X STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4 X<br />
1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />
1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />
1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />
2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />
3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />
4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />
5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />
6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />
2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />
3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />
4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />
5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />
6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
4<br />
4<br />
5<br />
7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />
ENGAGING FIRST EXPOSURE TO THE FOREIGN CULTURE AND<br />
LANGUAGE THROUGH ART, MUSIC AND LANGUAGE.<br />
8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />
NONE<br />
9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />
NONE<br />
7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM?<br />
OUTSTANDING PROGRAM.<br />
8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />
NONE<br />
9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />
NONE<br />
Y<br />
WHY?<br />
ARTIST: MICHELINGUA, LLC dba LINGUAKIDS CONTRACT #: A8402D<br />
TITLE OF PROGRAM: PATRICIA FIGUEROA - SPANISH ART, CULTURE &<br />
LANGUAGE<br />
TYPE OF PROGRAM: WORKSHOP<br />
DISTRICT/ SCHOOL:<br />
# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />
PELHAM/HUTCHINSON ELEM.<br />
# OF STUDENTS: 9 GRADE(S) K-5<br />
DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 1/19-5/25/12<br />
NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />
STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 X STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4 X<br />
ARTIST: MICHELINGUA, LLC dba LINGUAKIDS CONTRACT #: A8401C<br />
TITLE OF PROGRAM: PATRICIA FIGUEROA - SPANISH ART, CULTURE &<br />
LANGUAGE<br />
TYPE OF PROGRAM: WORKSHOP<br />
DISTRICT/ SCHOOL: KATONAH/LEWISBORO/LEWISBORO ELEM.<br />
# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />
# OF STUDENTS: 10 GRADE(S) 3 & 4<br />
DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 2/6-5/11/12<br />
NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />
STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 X STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4 X<br />
1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />
1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />
1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />
2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />
3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />
4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />
5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />
6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />
7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />
THE COURSE TAUGHT STUDENTS ABOUT A NEW CULTURE AND<br />
LANGUAGE, AND THEY HAVE FUN AT THE SAME TIME. CHILDREN<br />
PERFORM SONGS FROM DIFFERENT CULTURES AND THEY ARE<br />
EXPOSED TO THE VARYING FORMS OF ART AND MUSIC.<br />
8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />
CONSIDER OFFERING INTERMEDIATE AND ADVANCED COURSES<br />
FOR STUDENTS WHO DEMONSTRATE THAT THEY ARE READY FOR<br />
THE NEXT LEVEL.<br />
9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />
SEVERAL PARENTS HAVE EXPRSSED THAT THEIR CHILDREN<br />
ENJOYED THE CLASS.<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />
2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />
3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />
4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />
5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />
6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />
7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />
EDUCATIONAL AND GREAT TO WORK WITH.<br />
8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />
NONE<br />
9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />
NONE<br />
4<br />
4<br />
4<br />
4<br />
4<br />
4<br />
Arts in Education Service - School Evaluations <strong>2011</strong>-<strong>2012</strong><br />
Page 226 of 332
ARTIST: MICHELINGUA, LLC dba LINGUAKIDS CONTRACT #: A7695C<br />
TITLE OF PROGRAM: PATRICIA FIGUEROA - SPANISH ART, CULTURE &<br />
LANGUAGE<br />
TYPE OF PROGRAM: WORKSHOP<br />
DISTRICT/ SCHOOL: KATONAH/LEWISBORO/LEWISBORO ELEM.<br />
# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />
# OF STUDENTS: 9 GRADE(S) 2-4<br />
DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 10/3-12/16/11<br />
NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />
STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 X STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4 X<br />
1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />
ARTIST: MICHELINGUA, LLC dba LINGUAKIDS CONTRACT #: A7752A<br />
TITLE OF PROGRAM: SUE LIU - MANDARIN ART, CULTURE & LANGUAGE I<br />
TYPE OF PROGRAM: WORKSHOP<br />
DISTRICT/ SCHOOL:<br />
# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />
PELHAM/COLONIAL ELEM.<br />
# OF STUDENTS: 9 GRADE(S) K-5<br />
DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 11/7/11-3/12/12<br />
NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />
STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 X STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4 X<br />
1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />
1.<br />
2.<br />
3.<br />
4.<br />
5.<br />
6.<br />
STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />
ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />
EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />
ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />
TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />
QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />
4<br />
4<br />
4<br />
4<br />
4<br />
4<br />
7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />
VERY FLEXIBLE AND GREAT EXPOSURE TO FOREIGN CULTURE AND<br />
LANGUAGE.<br />
8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />
NONE<br />
9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />
NONE<br />
1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />
2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />
3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />
4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />
5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />
6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />
7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />
ALL THE PARENT FEEDBACK WAS EXCEEDINGLY POSITIVE.<br />
8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />
NONE<br />
9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />
NONE<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
4<br />
4<br />
ARTIST: MICHELINGUA, LLC dba LINGUAKIDS CONTRACT #: A7752B<br />
TITLE OF PROGRAM: SUE LIU - MANDARIN ART, CULTURE & LANGUAGE II<br />
TYPE OF PROGRAM: WORKSHOP<br />
DISTRICT/ SCHOOL:<br />
# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />
PELHAM/COLONIAL ELEM.<br />
# OF STUDENTS: 10 GRADE(S) K-5<br />
DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 11/18/11-3/6/12<br />
NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />
STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 X STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4 X<br />
ARTIST: MICHELINGUA, LLC dba LINGUAKIDS CONTRACT #: A8402A<br />
TITLE OF PROGRAM: SUE LIU - MANDARIN ART, CULTURE & LANGUAGE<br />
TYPE OF PROGRAM: WORKSHOP<br />
DISTRICT/ SCHOOL:<br />
# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />
PELHAM/HUTCHINSON ELEM.<br />
# OF STUDENTS: 9 GRADE(S) K-3<br />
DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 1/19-5/25/12<br />
NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />
STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 X STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4 X<br />
1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />
1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />
1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />
2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />
3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />
4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />
5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />
6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />
7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />
OUTSTANDING PROGRAM.<br />
8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />
NONE<br />
9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />
NONE<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
4<br />
4<br />
1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />
2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />
3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />
4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />
5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />
6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />
7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />
THE COURSE TAUGHT STUDENTS ABOUT A NEW CULTURE AND<br />
LANGUAGE, AND THEY HAVE FUN AT THE SAME TIME. CHILDREN<br />
PERFORM SONGS FROM DIFFERENT CULTURES AND THEY ARE<br />
EXPOSED TO THE VARYING FORMS OF ART AND MUSIC.<br />
8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />
CONSIDER OFFERING INTERMEDIATE AND ADVANCED COURSES<br />
FOR STUDENTS WHO DEMONSTRATE THAT THEY ARE READY FOR<br />
THE NEXT LEVEL.<br />
9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />
SEVERAL PARENTS HAVE EXPRSSED THAT THEIR CHILDREN<br />
ENJOYED THE CLASS.<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
Arts in Education Service - School Evaluations <strong>2011</strong>-<strong>2012</strong><br />
Page 227 of 332
ARTIST: MICHELINGUA, LLC dba LINGUAKIDS CONTRACT #: A8235B<br />
TITLE OF PROGRAM: SUE LUI - MANDARIN ART, CULTURE & LANGUAGE<br />
TYPE OF PROGRAM: WORKSHOP<br />
DISTRICT/ SCHOOL:<br />
# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />
PELHAM/PROSPECT HILL ELEM.<br />
# OF STUDENTS: 7 GRADE(S) 1-5<br />
DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 1/11-3/21/12<br />
NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />
STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 X STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4 X<br />
1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />
ARTIST: MICHELINGUA, LLC dba LINGUAKIDS CONTRACT #: A8402E<br />
TITLE OF PROGRAM: VALERIE LE COZ - FRENCH ART, CULTURE &<br />
LANGUAGE<br />
TYPE OF PROGRAM: WORKSHOP<br />
DISTRICT/ SCHOOL:<br />
# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />
PELHAM/HUTCHINSON ELEM.<br />
# OF STUDENTS: 9 GRADE(S) K-5<br />
DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 1/19-5/25/12<br />
NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />
STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 X STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4 X<br />
1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />
1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />
2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />
3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />
4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />
5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />
6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />
7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />
ENGAGING FIRST EXPOSURE TO THE FOREIGN CULTURE AND<br />
LANGUAGE THROUGH ART, MUSIC AND LANGUAGE.<br />
8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />
NONE<br />
9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />
NONE<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />
2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />
3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />
4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />
5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />
6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />
7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />
THE COURSE TAUGHT STUDENTS ABOUT A NEW CULTURE AND<br />
LANGUAGE, AND THEY HAVE FUN AT THE SAME TIME. CHILDREN<br />
PERFORM SONGS FROM DIFFERENT CULTURES AND THEY ARE<br />
EXPOSED TO THE VARYING FORMS OF ART AND MUSIC.<br />
8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />
CONSIDER OFFERING INTERMEDIATE AND ADVANCED COURSES<br />
FOR STUDENTS WHO DEMONSTRATE THAT THEY ARE READY FOR<br />
THE NEXT LEVEL.<br />
9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />
SEVERAL PARENTS HAVE EXPRSSED THAT THEIR CHILDREN<br />
ENJOYED THE CLASS.<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
ARTIST: MICHELINGUA, LLC dba LINGUAKIDS CONTRACT #: A8235A<br />
TITLE OF PROGRAM: VALERIE LECOZ - FRENCH ART, CULTURE &<br />
LANGUAGE<br />
TYPE OF PROGRAM: WORKSHOP<br />
DISTRICT/ SCHOOL:<br />
# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />
PELHAM/PROSPECT HILL ELEM.<br />
# OF STUDENTS: 9 GRADE(S) 1 & 2<br />
DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 1/11-3/21/12<br />
NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />
STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 X STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4 X<br />
ARTIST: MICHELINGUA, LLC dba LINGUAKIDS CONTRACT #: A7736A<br />
TITLE OF PROGRAM: VALERIE LECOZ - FRENCH ART, CULTURE &<br />
LANGUAGE I<br />
TYPE OF PROGRAM: WORKSHOP<br />
DISTRICT/ SCHOOL:<br />
# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />
PELHAM/COLONIAL ELEM.<br />
# OF STUDENTS: 9 GRADE(S) K-5<br />
DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 11/7/11-3/12/12<br />
NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />
STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 X STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4 X<br />
1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />
1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />
1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />
2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />
3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />
4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />
5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />
6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />
2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />
3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />
4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />
5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />
6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
4<br />
4<br />
4<br />
7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />
ENGAGING FIRST EXPOSURE TO THE FOREIGN CULTURE AND<br />
LANGUAGE THROUGH ART, MUSIC AND LANGUAGE.<br />
8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />
NONE<br />
9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />
NONE<br />
7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM?<br />
OUTSTANDING PROGRAM.<br />
8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />
NONE<br />
9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />
NONE<br />
Y<br />
WHY?<br />
Arts in Education Service - School Evaluations <strong>2011</strong>-<strong>2012</strong><br />
Page 228 of 332
ARTIST: MICHELINGUA, LLC dba LINGUAKIDS CONTRACT #: A7736B<br />
TITLE OF PROGRAM: VALERIE LECOZ - FRENCH ART, CULTURE &<br />
LANGUAGE II<br />
TYPE OF PROGRAM: WORKSHOP<br />
DISTRICT/ SCHOOL:<br />
# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />
PELHAM/COLONIAL ELEM.<br />
# OF STUDENTS: 9 GRADE(S) K-5<br />
DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 11/18/11-3/6/12<br />
NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />
STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 X STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4 X<br />
1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />
ARTIST: MICHELLE (SHELLEY) L. PERSALL CONTRACT #: A7596<br />
TITLE OF PROGRAM: AUTHOR VISIT<br />
TYPE OF PROGRAM: ASSEMBLY<br />
DISTRICT/ SCHOOL: YORKTOWN/MILDRED STRANG MIDDLE SCHOOL<br />
# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />
# OF STUDENTS: GRADE(S) 7<br />
DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 9/22/11<br />
NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />
STANDARD 1 STANDARD 2 STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />
1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />
1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />
2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />
3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />
4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />
5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />
6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />
7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />
OUTSTANDING PROGRAM.<br />
8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />
NONE<br />
9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />
NONE<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
4<br />
4<br />
5<br />
1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />
2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />
3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />
4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />
5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />
6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />
7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />
ABSOLUTELY.<br />
8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />
NONE<br />
9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />
FANTASTIC DAY.<br />
4<br />
N/<br />
N/<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
ARTIST: MIKE RISKO MUSIC SCHOOL, LLC CONTRACT #: A8039<br />
TITLE OF PROGRAM: JOHN BARNAS - GUITAR<br />
TYPE OF PROGRAM: WORKSHOP<br />
DISTRICT/ SCHOOL:<br />
# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />
CHAPPAQUA/GRAFFLIN ELEM.<br />
# OF STUDENTS: 9 GRADE(S) 3 & 4<br />
DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 1/13-3/9/12<br />
NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />
STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 X STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />
ARTIST: MIRIAM FERNANDEZ<br />
CONTRACT #: A7925A<br />
TITLE OF PROGRAM: SPANISH ART, CULTURE & LANGUAGE<br />
TYPE OF PROGRAM: WORKSHOP<br />
DISTRICT/ SCHOOL: CHAPPAQUA/WESTORCHARD ELEM.<br />
# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />
# OF STUDENTS: 8 GRADE(S) 3 & 4<br />
DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 1/11-2/29/12<br />
NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />
STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 X STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4 X<br />
1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />
1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />
1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />
2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />
3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />
4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />
5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />
6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />
4<br />
4<br />
4<br />
4<br />
3<br />
3<br />
1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />
2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />
3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />
4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />
5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />
6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM?<br />
NONE<br />
Y<br />
WHY?<br />
7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM?<br />
FANTASTIC CLASS.<br />
Y<br />
WHY?<br />
8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />
NONE<br />
9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />
EXCELLENT INSTRUCTOR. PREPARED. GREAT END OF YEAR<br />
SHOW. STUDENTS ENJOYED.<br />
8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />
NONE<br />
9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />
NONE<br />
Arts in Education Service - School Evaluations <strong>2011</strong>-<strong>2012</strong><br />
Page 229 of 332
ARTIST: MIRIAM FERNANDEZ<br />
CONTRACT #: A7925B<br />
TITLE OF PROGRAM: SPANISH ART, CULTURE & LANGUAGE<br />
TYPE OF PROGRAM: WORKSHOP<br />
DISTRICT/ SCHOOL: CHAPPAQUA/WESTORCHARD ELEM.<br />
# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />
# OF STUDENTS: 8 GRADE(S) 3 & 4<br />
DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 1/11-2/29/12<br />
NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />
STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 X STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4 X<br />
ARTIST: MONICA WELLINGTON<br />
CONTRACT #: A8210<br />
TITLE OF PROGRAM: AUTHOR VISIT<br />
TYPE OF PROGRAM: ASSEMBLY<br />
DISTRICT/ SCHOOL: CHAPPAQUA/ROARING BROOK ELEM.<br />
# OF TEACHERS: 9<br />
# OF STUDENTS: 200 GRADE(S) K & 1<br />
DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 3/30/12<br />
NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />
STANDARD 1 STANDARD 2 STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />
1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />
1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />
1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />
2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />
3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />
4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />
5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />
6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />
7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />
NONE<br />
8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />
NONE<br />
9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />
NONE<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />
2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />
3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />
4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />
5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />
6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />
7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />
K AND 1ST GRADE STUDENTS BOTH ENJOYED THE PROGRAM.<br />
8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />
NONE<br />
9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />
MONICA WAS VERY PERSONABLE WITH CHILDREN. SHE SHARED<br />
AN ACTUAL BOOK SHE WROTE IN FIRST GRADE WHICH MADE A BIG<br />
IMPRESSION ON OUR FIRST GRADERS.<br />
4<br />
4<br />
4<br />
4<br />
4<br />
N/<br />
ARTIST: NAI-NI CHEN DANCE COMPANY CONTRACT #: A7918<br />
TITLE OF PROGRAM: ART OF CHINESE DANCE<br />
TYPE OF PROGRAM: ASSEMBLY<br />
DISTRICT/ SCHOOL: PLEASANTVILLE/BEDFORD ROAD ELEM.<br />
# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />
# OF STUDENTS: 140 GRADE(S) 3<br />
DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 1/11/12<br />
NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />
STANDARD 1 STANDARD 2 STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4 X<br />
ARTIST: NANCY WU<br />
CONTRACT #: A7832<br />
TITLE OF PROGRAM: ORCHESTRA SEMINAR<br />
TYPE OF PROGRAM: WORKSHOP<br />
DISTRICT/ SCHOOL: BYRAM HILLS/BYRAM HILLS HIGH SCHOOL<br />
# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />
# OF STUDENTS: 41 GRADE(S) 9-12<br />
DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 3/15/12<br />
NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />
STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />
1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />
1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />
1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />
2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />
3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />
4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />
5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />
6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />
7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />
THIS PROGRAM ALLOWED OUR STUDENTS TO BECOME FULLY<br />
IMMERSED INTO THE CHINESE CULTURE AND MADE CONNECTIONS<br />
THAT THE CHILDREN COULD EASILY UNDERSTAND.<br />
8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />
WE WOULD HAVE LOVED TO HAVE SEEN AN AUTHENTIC CHINESE<br />
NEW YEAR DANCE SUCH AS THE LION OR DRAGON DANCE.<br />
9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />
THIS WAS AN OUTSTANDING PERFORMANCE. THANK YOU.<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
4<br />
1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />
2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />
3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />
4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />
5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />
6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />
7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />
NONE<br />
8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />
NONE<br />
9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />
ANOTHER GREAT VISIT.<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
Arts in Education Service - School Evaluations <strong>2011</strong>-<strong>2012</strong><br />
Page 230 of 332
ARTIST: NATALIE KINSEY-WARNOCK<br />
CONTRACT #: A7737<br />
TITLE OF PROGRAM: AUTHOR VISIT<br />
TYPE OF PROGRAM: ASSEMBLY/WORKSHOP<br />
DISTRICT/ SCHOOL:<br />
# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />
YORKTOWN/BROOKSIDE ELEM.<br />
# OF STUDENTS: 119 GRADE(S) 3<br />
DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 10/13/11<br />
NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />
STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />
ARTIST: NATALIE KINSEY-WARNOCK<br />
CONTRACT #: A8491<br />
TITLE OF PROGRAM: AUTHOR/ILLUSTRATOR VISIT<br />
TYPE OF PROGRAM: ASSEMBLY/WORKSHOP<br />
DISTRICT/ SCHOOL:<br />
# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />
NORTH SALEM/PQ ELEM.<br />
# OF STUDENTS: GRADE(S) 2<br />
DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 3/22/12<br />
NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />
STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />
1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />
1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />
1.<br />
2.<br />
3.<br />
4.<br />
5.<br />
6.<br />
STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />
ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />
EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />
ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />
TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />
QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />
MOST DEFINITLY. NATALIE IS PERFECT FOR 3RD GRADERS, AS HER<br />
WRITING FROM THE SENSES AND FINDING FAMILY STORIES<br />
DOVETAILS PERFECTLY WITH NARRATIVE WRITING THAT'S TAUGHT.<br />
8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />
NONE<br />
9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />
NONE<br />
1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />
2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />
3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />
4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />
5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />
6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />
7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />
NATALIE DOES AN AMAZING JOB AND INSPIRES STUDENTS TO<br />
LOOK FOR THEIR OWN FAMILY STORIES TO WRITE AND SHARE<br />
WITH OTHERS.<br />
8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />
NONE<br />
9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />
WE THOUGHT SHE WAS EXCELLENT.<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
ARTIST: NATALIE KINSEY-WARNOCK<br />
CONTRACT #: A8612<br />
TITLE OF PROGRAM: AUTHOR/ILLUSTRATOR VISIT<br />
TYPE OF PROGRAM: ASSEMBLY/WORKSHOP<br />
DISTRICT/ SCHOOL: KATONAH/LEWISBORO/KATONAH ELEM. SCHOOL<br />
# OF TEACHERS: 4<br />
# OF STUDENTS: 84 GRADE(S) 4<br />
DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 3/23/12<br />
NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />
STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />
ARTIST: NATHANIEL (NICCO) ANNAN<br />
CONTRACT #: A8151<br />
TITLE OF PROGRAM: CHOREOGRAPHER FOR THE SPRING MUSICAL<br />
TYPE OF PROGRAM: RESIDENCY<br />
DISTRICT/ SCHOOL: GREENBURGH #7/WOODLANDS MS/HS<br />
# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />
# OF STUDENTS: 47 GRADE(S) 7-12<br />
DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 12/13/11-3/31/12<br />
NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />
STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 X STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4 X<br />
1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />
1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />
1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />
2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />
3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />
4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />
5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />
6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />
7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />
PRESENTATION WAS VERY ENGAGING. GREAT STORYTELLER.<br />
8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />
NONE<br />
9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />
THIS WAS AN EXCELLENT PROGRAM. TEACHERS AND STUDENTS<br />
WERE FASCINATED BY THE STORIES. WOULD DEFINITELY REPEAT<br />
THIS PRESENTATION.<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
N/<br />
1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />
2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />
3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />
4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />
5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />
6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />
7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />
EXCELLENT CHOREOGRAPHER.<br />
8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />
NONE<br />
9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />
NONE<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
Arts in Education Service - School Evaluations <strong>2011</strong>-<strong>2012</strong><br />
Page 231 of 332
ARTIST: NATHANIEL (NICCO) ANNAN<br />
CONTRACT #: A7517<br />
TITLE OF PROGRAM: DANCE RESIDENCY<br />
TYPE OF PROGRAM: RESIDENCY<br />
DISTRICT/ SCHOOL:<br />
# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />
GREENBURGH #7/R.J. BAILEY ES<br />
# OF STUDENTS: 100+ GRADE(S) 4-6<br />
DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE OCT., <strong>2011</strong>-JUNE, <strong>2012</strong><br />
NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />
STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 X STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4 X<br />
ARTIST: NATHANIEL (NICCO) ANNAN<br />
CONTRACT #: A8780<br />
TITLE OF PROGRAM: DIRECTOR COORD. FOR THE TALENT SHOW<br />
TYPE OF PROGRAM: RESIDENCY<br />
DISTRICT/ SCHOOL: GREENBURGH #7/WOODLANDS HIGH SCHOOL<br />
# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />
# OF STUDENTS: 50 GRADE(S) 9-12<br />
DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 4/23-5/31/12<br />
NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />
STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 X STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4 X<br />
1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />
1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />
1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />
2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />
3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />
4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />
5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />
6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />
2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />
3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />
4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />
5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />
6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM?<br />
EXCELLENT.<br />
Y<br />
WHY?<br />
7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM?<br />
NONE<br />
Y<br />
WHY?<br />
8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />
NONE<br />
9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />
NONE<br />
8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />
NONE<br />
9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />
NONE<br />
ARTIST: NATHANIEL (NICCO) ANNAN<br />
CONTRACT #: A7516<br />
TITLE OF PROGRAM: DRAMA RESIDENCY<br />
TYPE OF PROGRAM: RESIDENCY<br />
DISTRICT/ SCHOOL: GREENBURGH #7/WOODLANDS HIGH SCHOOL<br />
# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />
# OF STUDENTS: 80 GRADE(S) 9-12<br />
DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE SEPT., <strong>2011</strong>-MA7, <strong>2012</strong><br />
NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />
STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 X STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4 X<br />
1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />
ARTIST: NATIONAL CIRCUS PROJECT<br />
CONTRACT #: A8395<br />
TITLE OF PROGRAM: AL CALIENES & ANDREW VINOKUROV - CIRCUS<br />
RESIDENCY<br />
TYPE OF PROGRAM: ASSEMBLY/WORKSHOP<br />
DISTRICT/ SCHOOL:<br />
# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />
CARMEL/KENT ELEM. SCHOOL<br />
# OF STUDENTS: GRADE(S) K-4<br />
DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 5/14-18/12<br />
NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />
STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 X STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4 X<br />
1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />
1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />
2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />
3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />
4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />
5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />
6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />
7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />
EXCELLENT TEACHER. TRULLY CARES ABOUT HIS STUDENTS.<br />
8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />
NONE<br />
9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />
NONE<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
N/<br />
1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />
2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />
3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />
4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />
5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />
6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />
7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />
FROM START TO FINISH - AN EXCELLENT ENGAGING PROGRAM.<br />
8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />
NONE<br />
9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />
NONE<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
Arts in Education Service - School Evaluations <strong>2011</strong>-<strong>2012</strong><br />
Page 232 of 332
ARTIST: NATIONAL CIRCUS PROJECT<br />
CONTRACT #: A7980<br />
TITLE OF PROGRAM: CIRCUS SHOW & WORKSHOPS<br />
TYPE OF PROGRAM: ASSEMBLY/WORKSHOP<br />
DISTRICT/ SCHOOL: HENDRICK HUDSON/BLUE MOUNTAIN MIDDLE SCHOO<br />
# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />
# OF STUDENTS: GRADE(S) 6-8<br />
DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 11/28-12/1/11<br />
NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />
STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 X STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4 X<br />
ARTIST: NATIONAL CIRCUS PROJECT<br />
CONTRACT #: A7678<br />
TITLE OF PROGRAM: CIRCUS SHOW & WORKSHOPS<br />
TYPE OF PROGRAM: ASSEMBLY/WORKSHOP<br />
DISTRICT/ SCHOOL:<br />
# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />
BRIARCLIFF/TODD ELEM.<br />
# OF STUDENTS: 640 GRADE(S) K-5<br />
DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 10/4-6/11<br />
NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />
STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 X STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4 X<br />
1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />
1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />
1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />
2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />
3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />
4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />
5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />
6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />
7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />
CIRCUS ARTS IS A GREAT PROGRAM THAT ENGAGES ALL<br />
DIFFERENTLY ABLED STUDENTS. THE PROGRAM ALLOWS ALL<br />
STUDENTS TO EXPERIENCE SUCCESS.<br />
8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />
NONE<br />
9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />
NONE<br />
4<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
4<br />
1.<br />
2.<br />
3.<br />
4.<br />
5.<br />
6.<br />
STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />
ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />
EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />
ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />
TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />
QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
4<br />
5<br />
N/<br />
7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />
THE STUDENTS LOVE THIS RESIDNECY. IT IS A PROGRAM THAT IS<br />
ENRICHING TO ALL.<br />
8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />
NONE<br />
9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />
NONE<br />
ARTIST: NATIONAL CIRCUS PROJECT<br />
CONTRACT #: A7936<br />
TITLE OF PROGRAM: CIRCUS SHOW & WORKSHOPS<br />
TYPE OF PROGRAM: ASSEMBLY/WORKSHOP<br />
DISTRICT/ SCHOOL: LAKELAND/GEORGE WASHINGTON ELEM.<br />
# OF TEACHERS: 2<br />
# OF STUDENTS: 500 GRADE(S) K-5<br />
DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 1/9/12<br />
NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />
STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 X STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4 X<br />
ARTIST: NEGO GATO ENTERPRISES<br />
CONTRACT #: A8845<br />
TITLE OF PROGRAM: AFRO BRAZILIAN MUSIC & DANCE<br />
TYPE OF PROGRAM: ASSEMBLY/WORKSHOP<br />
DISTRICT/ SCHOOL: PLEASANTVILLE/PLEASANTVILLE MIDDLE SCHOOL<br />
# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />
# OF STUDENTS: GRADE(S) 5<br />
DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 5/31/12<br />
NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />
STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4 X<br />
1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />
1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />
1.<br />
2.<br />
3.<br />
4.<br />
5.<br />
6.<br />
STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />
ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />
EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />
ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />
TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />
QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />
5<br />
5<br />
N/<br />
5<br />
5<br />
N/<br />
7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />
THE ARTISTS KEPT THE CHILDREN AWED, SURPRISED, CURIOUS<br />
AND FOCUSED. STUDENTS WERE COMFORTABLE VOLUNTEERING<br />
AND CONFIDENT THEY WERE WITH PROFESSIONALS. THE ARTISTS<br />
DEMONSTRATIONS AND LEARNING CUES ADDRESSED ALL<br />
LEARNING STYLES.<br />
8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />
NONE<br />
9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />
THEY WERE WONDERFUL.<br />
1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />
2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />
3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />
4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />
5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />
6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />
7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />
THE STUDENTS WERE ENJOYING THEMSELVES WHILE LEARNING<br />
ABOUT HISTORY.<br />
8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />
I FEEL THE KICKS AND CARTWHEELS SHOULD HAVE ONLY BEEN<br />
DEMONSTRATED.<br />
9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />
NONE<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
3<br />
N/<br />
Arts in Education Service - School Evaluations <strong>2011</strong>-<strong>2012</strong><br />
Page 233 of 332
ARTIST: NEGO GATO ENTERPRISES<br />
CONTRACT #: A8234<br />
TITLE OF PROGRAM: AFRO BRIAZILIAN MUSIC & DANCE<br />
TYPE OF PROGRAM: ASSEMBLY/WORKSHOP<br />
DISTRICT/ SCHOOL: KATONAH/LEWISBORO/MEADOWPOND ELEM.<br />
# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />
# OF STUDENTS: GRADE(S) K-5<br />
DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 5/29/12<br />
NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />
STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4 X<br />
ARTIST: NEIL FOSMAN<br />
CONTRACT #: A8736<br />
TITLE OF PROGRAM: KEYBOARD PLAYER FOR THE SHOW - XANADU<br />
TYPE OF PROGRAM: ASSEMBLY<br />
DISTRICT/ SCHOOL: CHAPPAQUA/HORACE GREELEY HIGH SCHOOL<br />
# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />
# OF STUDENTS: 200 GRADE(S) 12<br />
DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 4/16-21/12<br />
NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />
STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />
1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />
1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />
1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />
2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />
3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />
4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />
5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />
6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />
2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />
3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />
4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />
5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />
6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />
THE STUDENTS WERE ENGAGED AND REALLY GOT A SENSE OF<br />
CULTURE.<br />
8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />
NONE<br />
9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />
THANK YOU.<br />
7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />
IMPORTANT FOR THE STUDENTS TO SEE HOW ALL THE<br />
COMPONENTS OF A MUSICAL SHOW COME TOGETHER.<br />
8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />
NONE<br />
9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />
NONE<br />
ARTIST: NICOLE ARAVENA<br />
CONTRACT #: A8107<br />
TITLE OF PROGRAM: CHOREOGRAPHER FOR THE SHOW - BARNUM<br />
TYPE OF PROGRAM: RESIDENCY<br />
DISTRICT/ SCHOOL: NORTH SALEM/NORTH SALEM MS & HS<br />
# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />
# OF STUDENTS: 51 GRADE(S) 6-12<br />
DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 12/5/11-2/2/12<br />
NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />
STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 X STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />
ARTIST: NICOLE WHITAKER<br />
CONTRACT #: A8549<br />
TITLE OF PROGRAM: HIP HOP DANCING<br />
TYPE OF PROGRAM: WORKSHOP<br />
DISTRICT/ SCHOOL: KATONAH/LEWISBORO/MEADOWPOND ELEM.<br />
# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />
# OF STUDENTS: 9 GRADE(S) 2-4<br />
DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 3/5-5/7/12<br />
NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />
STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 X STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4 X<br />
1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />
1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />
1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />
2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />
3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />
4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />
5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />
6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />
2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />
3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />
4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />
5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />
6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
4<br />
N/<br />
7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y<br />
VERY ORGANIZED AND WONDERFUL WITH STUDENTS.<br />
WHY?<br />
7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM?<br />
STUDENTS LOVED NICOLE.<br />
Y<br />
WHY?<br />
8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />
NONE<br />
9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />
NONE<br />
8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />
NONE<br />
9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />
NONE<br />
Arts in Education Service - School Evaluations <strong>2011</strong>-<strong>2012</strong><br />
Page 234 of 332
ARTIST: NICOLE YOUNG<br />
CONTRACT #: A8026<br />
TITLE OF PROGRAM: HIP HOP & CONTEMPORARY DANCE FOR JAZZ CO<br />
TYPE OF PROGRAM: WORKSHOP<br />
DISTRICT/ SCHOOL: TUCKAHOE/TUCKAHOE HIGH SCHOOL<br />
# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />
# OF STUDENTS: 60 GRADE(S) 9-12<br />
DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 11/28/11-3/3/12<br />
NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />
STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 X STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4 X<br />
ARTIST: NICOLE YOUNG<br />
CONTRACT #: A7860<br />
TITLE OF PROGRAM: JAZZ & HIP HOP DANCING<br />
TYPE OF PROGRAM: WORKSHOP<br />
DISTRICT/ SCHOOL: EASTCHESTER/EASTCHESTER HIGH SCHOOL<br />
# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />
# OF STUDENTS: 20 GRADE(S) 9-12<br />
DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 11/2/11-1/18/12<br />
NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />
STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 X STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4 X<br />
1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />
1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />
1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />
2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />
3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />
4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />
5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />
6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />
2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />
3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />
4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />
5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />
6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />
DANCE IS FUN, EDUCATIONAL, CULTURAL AND ARTISTIC.<br />
7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM?<br />
NONE<br />
Y<br />
WHY?<br />
8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />
TIME MANAGEMENT.<br />
9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />
NONE<br />
8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />
NONE<br />
9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />
NICOLE BRINGS AN ENERGY TO THE COMPANY AND IS ALWAYS<br />
WONDERFUL TO WORK WITH.<br />
ARTIST: NINA TOCANTINA<br />
CONTRACT #: A7504A<br />
TITLE OF PROGRAM: BALLET DANCING<br />
TYPE OF PROGRAM: WORKSHOP<br />
DISTRICT/ SCHOOL: KATONAH/LEWISBORO/INCREASE MILLER ELEM.<br />
# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />
# OF STUDENTS: 9 GRADE(S) 1-3<br />
DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 10/3-11/28/11<br />
NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />
STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 X STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4 X<br />
ARTIST: NINA TOCANTINA<br />
CONTRACT #: A7504A<br />
TITLE OF PROGRAM: DANCE SQUAD<br />
TYPE OF PROGRAM: WORKSHOP<br />
DISTRICT/ SCHOOL: KATONAH/LEWISBORO/INCREASE MILLER ELEM.<br />
# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />
# OF STUDENTS: 11 GRADE(S) K-5<br />
DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 10/4-11/22/11<br />
NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />
STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 X STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />
1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />
1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />
1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />
2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />
3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />
4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />
5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />
6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
N/<br />
1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />
2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />
3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />
4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />
5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />
6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
N/<br />
7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y<br />
WE ARE SO LUCKY TO HAVE NINA TEACHING HERE.<br />
WHY?<br />
7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />
NINA IS FABULOUS. SHE IS A GREAT DANCER AND TEACHER.<br />
8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />
NONE<br />
9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />
NONE<br />
8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />
NONE<br />
9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />
NONE<br />
Arts in Education Service - School Evaluations <strong>2011</strong>-<strong>2012</strong><br />
Page 235 of 332
ARTIST: NYC CHINESE CULTURAL CENTER, INC. CONTRACT #: A8090<br />
TITLE OF PROGRAM: CHINA PATTERNS<br />
TYPE OF PROGRAM: ASSEMBLY<br />
DISTRICT/ SCHOOL: EASTCHESTER/ANNE HUTCHINSON ELEM.<br />
# OF TEACHERS: 2<br />
# OF STUDENTS: 475 GRADE(S) 2-5<br />
DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 12/9/11<br />
NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />
STANDARD 1 STANDARD 2 STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4 X<br />
ARTIST: NYC CHINESE CULTURAL CENTER, INC.<br />
CONTRACT #: A8171<br />
TITLE OF PROGRAM: CHINA PATTERNS<br />
TYPE OF PROGRAM: ASSEMBLY<br />
DISTRICT/ SCHOOL: HENDRICK HUDSON/FURNACE WOODS ELEM.<br />
# OF TEACHERS: 5<br />
# OF STUDENTS: GRADE(S) K-5<br />
DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 2/16/12<br />
NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />
STANDARD 1 STANDARD 2 STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4 X<br />
1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />
1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />
1.<br />
2.<br />
3.<br />
4.<br />
5.<br />
6.<br />
STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />
ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />
EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />
ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />
TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />
QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />
THE PERFORMERS WERE PROFESSIONAL, ENGAGING, AND DID AN<br />
OUTSTANDING PERFORMANCE.<br />
8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />
NONE<br />
9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />
THEY DID A GREAT JOB CONTROLLING THE AUDIENCE AND<br />
KEEPING THEM ENGAGED.<br />
ARTIST: NYC CHINESE CULTURAL CENTER, INC.<br />
TITLE OF PROGRAM: CHINA PATTERNS<br />
TYPE OF PROGRAM: ASSEMBLY<br />
DISTRICT/ SCHOOL:<br />
EASTCHESTER/GREENVALE ELEM.<br />
CONTRACT #: A7567<br />
# OF TEACHERS: 6<br />
# OF STUDENTS: 141 GRADE(S) 3<br />
DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE<br />
1/22/12<br />
NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />
STANDARD 1 STANDARD 2 STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4 X<br />
1.<br />
2.<br />
3.<br />
4.<br />
5.<br />
6.<br />
STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />
ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />
EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />
ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />
TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />
QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />
SUPER JOB. GREAT PERFORMANCE. THEY WERE EXCELLENT IN<br />
THEIR PERFORMANCE AND PROFESSIONAL IN THEIR<br />
PRESENTATION.<br />
8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />
NONE<br />
9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />
I LIKED HOW THEY INCLUDED LEARNING SOME CHINESE PHASES<br />
AND HAD CHILDREN PARTICIPATE IN A DANCE.<br />
ARTIST: NYC CHINESE CULTURAL CENTER, INC.<br />
TITLE OF PROGRAM: CHINESE RIBBON DANCE<br />
TYPE OF PROGRAM: WORKSHOP<br />
DISTRICT/ SCHOOL:<br />
CONTRACT #: A8131<br />
KATONAH/LEWISBORO/MEADOWPOND ELEM.<br />
# OF TEACHERS: 3<br />
# OF STUDENTS: 56 GRADE(S) 3<br />
DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE<br />
3/27/12<br />
NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />
STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 X STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4 X<br />
1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />
1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />
1.<br />
2.<br />
3.<br />
4.<br />
5.<br />
6.<br />
STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />
ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />
EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />
ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />
TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />
QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
N/<br />
7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />
EXCELLENT PROGRAM. PERFORMERS EXPLAINED DANCES,<br />
PROVINCES IN CHINA THE DANCES WERE FROM AND MEANING OF<br />
THE VARIOUS DANCES.<br />
8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />
NONE<br />
9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />
NONE<br />
1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />
2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />
3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />
4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />
5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />
6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />
7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />
STUDENTS REALLY ENJOYED IT.<br />
8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />
INSTRUCTOR SHOULD EXPLAIN MORE ABOUT THE DANCE AND<br />
TAKE QUESTIONS FROM THE STUDENTS.<br />
9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />
NONE<br />
5<br />
4<br />
2<br />
3<br />
4<br />
1<br />
Arts in Education Service - School Evaluations <strong>2011</strong>-<strong>2012</strong><br />
Page 236 of 332
ARTIST: NYC CHINESE CULTURAL CENTER, INC. CONTRACT #: A8662<br />
TITLE OF PROGRAM: CHINESE TRADITIONAL ARTS<br />
TYPE OF PROGRAM: WORKSHOP<br />
DISTRICT/ SCHOOL: DOBBS FERRY/SPRINGHURST ELEM.<br />
# OF TEACHERS: 5<br />
# OF STUDENTS: 105 GRADE(S) 3<br />
DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 3/15-28/12<br />
NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />
STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 X STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4 X<br />
1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />
ARTIST: OHENIO PRINCE<br />
CONTRACT #: A8623<br />
TITLE OF PROGRAM: EBONY HILLBILLIES - AMERICAN ROOTS MUSIC<br />
CONCERT<br />
TYPE OF PROGRAM: ASSEMBLY<br />
DISTRICT/ SCHOOL: NEW ROCHELLE/DANIEL WEBSTER ELEM.<br />
# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />
# OF STUDENTS: 550 GRADE(S) K-5<br />
DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 3/13/12<br />
NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />
STANDARD 1 STANDARD 2 STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4 X<br />
1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />
1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />
2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />
3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />
4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />
5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />
6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />
7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />
NONE<br />
8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />
NONE<br />
9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />
PING DID A GREAT JOB CONNECTING WITH THE SPECIAL<br />
EDUCATION STUDENTS.<br />
5<br />
5<br />
4<br />
4<br />
4<br />
5<br />
1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />
2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />
3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />
4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />
5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />
6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />
7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />
UPLIFTING AND JOYFUL CONCERT EXPERIENCE.<br />
8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />
NONE<br />
9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />
NONE<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
N/<br />
ARTIST: ONE WORLD ARTS, INC.<br />
CONTRACT #: A7689<br />
TITLE OF PROGRAM: RETUMBA - JOURNEY THRU THE CARRIBBEAN ALL<br />
WOMEN SHOW<br />
TYPE OF PROGRAM: ASSEMBLY<br />
DISTRICT/ SCHOOL:<br />
# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />
OSSINING/CLAREMONT ELEM.<br />
# OF STUDENTS: GRADE(S) 3 & 4<br />
DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 10/3/11<br />
NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />
STANDARD 1 STANDARD 2 STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4 X<br />
1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />
ARTIST: OVERFOOT, INC. - JODY OBERFELDER CONTRACT #: A7856B<br />
TITLE OF PROGRAM: MODERN DANCE<br />
TYPE OF PROGRAM: RESIDENCY<br />
DISTRICT/ SCHOOL: EASTCHESTER/EASTCHESTER HIGH SCHOOL<br />
# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />
# OF STUDENTS: GRADE(S) 9-12<br />
DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 11/3/11-1/19/12<br />
NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />
STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 X STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4 X<br />
1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />
1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />
2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />
3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />
4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />
5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />
6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />
7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />
STUDENTS, TEACHERS AND THE PRINCIPAL REALLY ENJOYED<br />
INTERACTING WITH THE GROUP.<br />
8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />
NONE<br />
9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />
WE USUALLY HAVE ASSEMPLY PERFORMERS EVERY OTHER YEAR,<br />
BUT RETUMBA WILL BE BACK.<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />
2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />
3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />
4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />
5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />
6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />
7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />
THE STUDENTS RECREATED A DANCE BY WATCHING A VIDEO.<br />
8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />
NONE<br />
9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />
JODY ALWAYS CREATES AN ATMOSPHERE OF CREATIVITY AND<br />
DISCOVERY.<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
N/<br />
N/<br />
Arts in Education Service - School Evaluations <strong>2011</strong>-<strong>2012</strong><br />
Page 237 of 332
ARTIST: OVERFOOT, INC. - JODY OBERFELDER CONTRACT #: A7856A<br />
TITLE OF PROGRAM: MODERN DANCE IMPROV<br />
TYPE OF PROGRAM: WORKSHOP<br />
DISTRICT/ SCHOOL: EASTCHESTER/EASTCHESTER HIGH SCHOOL<br />
# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />
# OF STUDENTS: 150 GRADE(S) 9-12<br />
DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 10/27/11<br />
NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />
STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 X STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4 X<br />
ARTIST: PAMELA HART<br />
CONTRACT #: A8225<br />
TITLE OF PROGRAM: THINKING THROUGH ART<br />
TYPE OF PROGRAM: WORKSHOP<br />
DISTRICT/ SCHOOL: KATONAH/LEWISBORO/INCREASE MILLER ELEM.<br />
# OF TEACHERS: 2<br />
# OF STUDENTS: 48 GRADE(S) 5<br />
DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 12/16/11, 2/3 & 10/12<br />
NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />
STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 X STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />
1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />
1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />
1.<br />
2.<br />
3.<br />
4.<br />
5.<br />
6.<br />
STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />
ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />
EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />
ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />
TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />
QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
N/<br />
N/<br />
7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />
JODY AND HER COMPANY SHARE THE JOY OF MOVEMENT WITH 150<br />
DANCES.<br />
8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />
NONE<br />
9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />
WE ARE THRILLED AS USUAL WITH HER CONTRIBUTION.<br />
1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />
2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />
3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />
4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />
5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />
6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />
7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />
NONE<br />
8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />
NONE<br />
9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />
NONE<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
ARTIST: PAMELA HART<br />
CONTRACT #: A8257<br />
TITLE OF PROGRAM: THINKING THROUGH ART<br />
TYPE OF PROGRAM: WORKSHOP<br />
DISTRICT/ SCHOOL: KATONAH/LEWISBORO/MEADOWPOND ELEM.<br />
# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />
# OF STUDENTS: 58 GRADE(S) 4<br />
DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 1/20/12<br />
NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />
STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 X STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />
ARTIST: PAMELA HART<br />
CONTRACT #: A8102<br />
TITLE OF PROGRAM: THINKING THROUGH ART<br />
TYPE OF PROGRAM: WORKSHOP<br />
DISTRICT/ SCHOOL: KATONAH/LEWISBORO/LEWISBORO ELEM.<br />
# OF TEACHERS: 3<br />
# OF STUDENTS: 62 GRADE(S) 4<br />
DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 12/1/11-2/2/12<br />
NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />
STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 X STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4 X<br />
1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />
1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />
1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />
2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />
3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />
4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />
5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />
6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />
7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />
NONE<br />
8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />
NONE<br />
9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />
NONE<br />
4<br />
4<br />
4<br />
4<br />
5<br />
4<br />
1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />
2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />
3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />
4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />
5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />
6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />
7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />
THE OPPORTUNITY TO WORK WITH A REAL POET AND MUSEUM IS<br />
A VALUABLE AND UNIQUE CONNECTION TO THE ART WORLD.<br />
8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />
INCORPORATE MORE OPPORTUNITIES FOR STUDENTS IN LARGE<br />
GROUP TO TURN AND TALK AS PART OF INTERACTIONS WITH<br />
ARTIST AND ARTWORK.<br />
9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />
PAM IS VERY KNOWLEDGEABLE AND FLEXIBLE.<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
Arts in Education Service - School Evaluations <strong>2011</strong>-<strong>2012</strong><br />
Page 238 of 332
ARTIST: PAMELA STEWART<br />
CONTRACT #: A8231<br />
TITLE OF PROGRAM: ACTING WORKSHOP<br />
TYPE OF PROGRAM: WORKSHOP<br />
DISTRICT/ SCHOOL: KATONAH/LEWISBORO/INCREASE MILLER ELEM.<br />
# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />
# OF STUDENTS: 9 GRADE(S) 3-5<br />
DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 1/23-3/19/12<br />
NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />
STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 X STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />
ARTIST: PAMELA STEWART<br />
CONTRACT #: A7546<br />
TITLE OF PROGRAM: ACTING WORKSHOP<br />
TYPE OF PROGRAM: WORKSHOP<br />
DISTRICT/ SCHOOL: KATONAH/LEWISBORO/KATONAH ELEM. SCHOOL<br />
# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />
# OF STUDENTS: 10 GRADE(S) 3-5<br />
DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 9/23-12/16/11<br />
NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />
STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />
1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />
1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />
1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />
2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />
3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />
4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />
5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />
6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />
2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />
3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />
4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />
5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />
6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />
4<br />
4<br />
4<br />
4<br />
4<br />
4<br />
7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />
WE ARE GETTING EXCELLENT REVIEWS OF THIS NEW CLASS.<br />
8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />
NONE<br />
9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />
NONE<br />
7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />
STUDENTS ENJOYED THIS CLASS. INSTRUCTOR WAS EASY TO<br />
WORK WITH.<br />
8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />
NONE<br />
9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />
NONE<br />
ARTIST: PAMELA STEWART<br />
CONTRACT #: A8288<br />
TITLE OF PROGRAM: ACTING WORKSHOP<br />
TYPE OF PROGRAM: WORKSHOP<br />
DISTRICT/ SCHOOL: KATONAH/LEWISBORO/KATONAH ELEM. SCHOOL<br />
# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />
# OF STUDENTS: 8 GRADE(S) 3-5<br />
DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 1/20-3/16/12<br />
NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />
STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 X STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />
ARTIST: PATRICIA ARENSON<br />
CONTRACT #: A8084<br />
TITLE OF PROGRAM: CHOREOGRAPHER FOR THE SPRING MUSICAL<br />
TYPE OF PROGRAM: RESIDENCY<br />
DISTRICT/ SCHOOL:<br />
# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />
ARDSLEY/ARDSLEY HIGH SCHOOL<br />
# OF STUDENTS: 500 GRADE(S) 9-12<br />
DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 12/16/11-3/17/12<br />
NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />
STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 X STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />
1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />
1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />
1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />
2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />
3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />
4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />
5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />
6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />
4<br />
4<br />
4<br />
4<br />
4<br />
4<br />
1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />
2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />
3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />
4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />
5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />
6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
4<br />
5<br />
7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />
VERY GOOD CLASS. WELL RUN AND WELL ORGANIZED.<br />
7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM?<br />
NONE<br />
Y<br />
WHY?<br />
8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />
NONE<br />
9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />
GOOD TEACHER.<br />
8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />
NONE<br />
9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />
NONE<br />
Arts in Education Service - School Evaluations <strong>2011</strong>-<strong>2012</strong><br />
Page 239 of 332
ARTIST: PATRICIA LAKIN KOENIGSBERG dba PAT CONTRACT #: A8133<br />
TITLE OF PROGRAM: AUTHOR VISIT<br />
TYPE OF PROGRAM: ASSEMBLY<br />
DISTRICT/ SCHOOL: CHAPPAQUA/WESTORCHARD ELEM.<br />
# OF TEACHERS: 5<br />
# OF STUDENTS: 103 GRADE(S) 1<br />
DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 2/29/12<br />
NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />
STANDARD 1 STANDARD 2 STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />
1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />
ARTIST: PATRICIA SANTOS<br />
CONTRACT #: A8646<br />
TITLE OF PROGRAM: CELLO PLAYER FOR THE SHOW - A FUNNY THING<br />
HAPPENED ON THE WAY TO THE FORUM<br />
TYPE OF PROGRAM: ASSEMBLY<br />
DISTRICT/ SCHOOL: PUTNAM VALLEY/PUTNAM VALLEY HIGH SCHOOL<br />
# OF TEACHERS: 3<br />
# OF STUDENTS: 400 GRADE(S) 9-12<br />
DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 4/13-23/12<br />
NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />
STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />
1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />
1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />
2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />
3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />
4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />
5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />
6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />
7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />
PATRICIA INTERACTS WELL WITH THE STUDENTS.<br />
8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />
NONE<br />
9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />
NONE<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5Y<br />
1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />
2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />
3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />
4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />
5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />
6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />
7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />
NONE<br />
8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />
NONE<br />
9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />
NONE<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
ARTIST: PATRICIA SCHORIES<br />
CONTRACT #: A8293<br />
TITLE OF PROGRAM: AUTHOR/ILLUSTRATOR VISIT - HOW A PICTURE<br />
BOOK IS MADE<br />
TYPE OF PROGRAM: ASSEMBLY<br />
DISTRICT/ SCHOOL:<br />
# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />
YORKTOWN/BROOKSIDE ELEM.<br />
# OF STUDENTS: 105 GRADE(S) K<br />
DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 1/25/12<br />
NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />
STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />
1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />
ARTIST: PATRICK GARNER<br />
CONTRACT #: A8189<br />
TITLE OF PROGRAM: THE WRIGHT BROTHERS & SISTER<br />
TYPE OF PROGRAM: ASSEMBLY<br />
DISTRICT/ SCHOOL: BREWSTER/GARDEN STREET ELEM.<br />
# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />
# OF STUDENTS: GRADE(S) K-3<br />
DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 12/14/11<br />
NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />
STANDARD 1 STANDARD 2 STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />
1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />
1.<br />
2.<br />
3.<br />
4.<br />
5.<br />
6.<br />
STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />
ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />
EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />
ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />
TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />
QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
N/<br />
7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />
PERFECT FOR K - LOOKING AT ILLUSTRATIONS ROLE IN STORIES.<br />
8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />
NONE<br />
9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />
NONE<br />
1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />
2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />
3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />
4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />
5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />
6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />
7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />
AS ALWAYS, PATRICK PUTS ON A GREAT PERFORMANCE.<br />
STUDENTS WERE ENGAGED AND EAGER TO HEAR THE STORY.<br />
8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />
NONE<br />
9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />
NONE<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
Arts in Education Service - School Evaluations <strong>2011</strong>-<strong>2012</strong><br />
Page 240 of 332
ARTIST: PAUL BERNARDI<br />
CONTRACT #: A8100<br />
TITLE OF PROGRAM: MUSICAL INSTRUMENT INSTRUCTION<br />
TYPE OF PROGRAM: RESIDENCY<br />
DISTRICT/ SCHOOL:<br />
# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />
TUCKAHOE/W. E. COTTLE ELEM.<br />
# OF STUDENTS: GRADE(S) 3-5<br />
DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE JAN.-JUNE, <strong>2012</strong><br />
NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />
STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 X STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />
ARTIST: PAUL HUGHES<br />
CONTRACT #: A7726<br />
TITLE OF PROGRAM: MAKING A VIDEO<br />
TYPE OF PROGRAM: WORKSHOP<br />
DISTRICT/ SCHOOL: KATONAH/LEWISBORO/LEWISBORO ELEM.<br />
# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />
# OF STUDENTS: 13 GRADE(S) 3-5<br />
DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 10/18-12/13/11<br />
NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />
STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 X STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />
1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />
1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />
1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />
2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />
3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />
4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />
5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />
6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />
2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />
3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />
4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />
5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />
6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />
4<br />
5<br />
4<br />
5<br />
5<br />
4<br />
7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM?<br />
NONE<br />
8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />
NONE<br />
9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />
NONE<br />
Y<br />
WHY?<br />
7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />
PAUL IS VERY INVOLVED WITH THE CHILDREN AND HAS A GOOD<br />
AMOUNT OF KNOWLEDGE ALL STUDENTS ENJOY HIS CLASSES.<br />
8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />
NONE<br />
9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />
NONE<br />
ARTIST: PAUL HUGHES<br />
CONTRACT #: A8760<br />
TITLE OF PROGRAM: PHOTOGRAPHY<br />
TYPE OF PROGRAM: WORKSHOP<br />
DISTRICT/ SCHOOL: KATONAH/LEWISBORO/LEWISBORO ELEM.<br />
# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />
# OF STUDENTS: GRADE(S) 4 & 5<br />
DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 4/25-5/30/12<br />
NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />
STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 X STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />
ARTIST: PEI LING LIU<br />
CONTRACT #: A8278<br />
TITLE OF PROGRAM: CHINESE ART & CULTURE<br />
TYPE OF PROGRAM: WORKSHOP<br />
DISTRICT/ SCHOOL: KATONAH/LEWISBORO/KATONAH ELEM. SCHOOL<br />
# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />
# OF STUDENTS: 9 GRADE(S) K & 1<br />
DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 1/19-3/15/12<br />
NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />
STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 X STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4 X<br />
1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />
1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />
1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />
2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />
3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />
4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />
5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />
6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />
7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />
AS ALWAYS, PAUL DID A WONDERFUL JOB. ALL THE CHILDREN<br />
WERE ENGAGED AND COULDN'T WAIT TO START THE CLASS.<br />
8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />
NONE<br />
9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />
NONE<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
1.<br />
2.<br />
3.<br />
4.<br />
5.<br />
6.<br />
STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />
ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />
EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />
ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />
TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />
QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />
EVERYONE LOVES PEILING. SHE IS A PLEASURE TO WORK WITH.<br />
8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />
NONE<br />
9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />
NONE<br />
Arts in Education Service - School Evaluations <strong>2011</strong>-<strong>2012</strong><br />
Page 241 of 332
ARTIST: PELHAM ART CENTER<br />
CONTRACT #: A8049C<br />
TITLE OF PROGRAM: SUSAN KAUFMAN - ARTS & CRAFTS / COLLAGE<br />
TYPE OF PROGRAM: RESIDENCY<br />
DISTRICT/ SCHOOL:<br />
# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />
PELHAM/PROSPECT HILL ELEM.<br />
# OF STUDENTS: 12 GRADE(S) K-2<br />
DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 1/12-3/8/12<br />
NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />
STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 X STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />
ARTIST: PELHAM ART CENTER<br />
CONTRACT #: A8049A<br />
TITLE OF PROGRAM: SUSAN KAUFMAN - ARTS & CRAFTS / PAPER CRAFTS<br />
TYPE OF PROGRAM: RESIDENCY<br />
DISTRICT/ SCHOOL:<br />
# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />
PELHAM/PROSPECT HILL ELEM.<br />
# OF STUDENTS: 9 GRADE(S) K-2<br />
DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 1/9-3/12/12<br />
NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />
STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 X STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />
1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />
1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />
1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />
2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />
3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />
4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />
5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />
6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
N/<br />
1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />
2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />
3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />
4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />
5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />
6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
N/<br />
7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM?<br />
NONE<br />
Y<br />
WHY?<br />
7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM?<br />
NONE<br />
Y<br />
WHY?<br />
8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />
NONE<br />
9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />
NONE<br />
8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />
NONE<br />
9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />
NONE<br />
ARTIST: PELHAM ART CENTER<br />
CONTRACT #: A8783<br />
TITLE OF PROGRAM: SUSAN KAUFMAN - FABRIC ART<br />
TYPE OF PROGRAM: WORKSHOP<br />
DISTRICT/ SCHOOL:<br />
# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />
PELHAM/HUTCHINSON ELEM.<br />
# OF STUDENTS: 65 GRADE(S) K<br />
DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 4/26-5/31/12<br />
NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />
STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 X STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />
ARTIST: PERIWINKLE NATIONAL THEATRE CONTRACT #: A7826<br />
TITLE OF PROGRAM: HALFWAY THERE<br />
TYPE OF PROGRAM: ASSEMBLY<br />
DISTRICT/ SCHOOL: KATONAH/LEWISBORO/JOHN JAY MIDDLE SCHOOL<br />
# OF TEACHERS: 5<br />
# OF STUDENTS: 110 GRADE(S) 6-8<br />
DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 11/8/11<br />
NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />
STANDARD 1 STANDARD 2 STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />
1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />
1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />
1.<br />
2.<br />
3.<br />
4.<br />
5.<br />
6.<br />
STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />
ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />
EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />
ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />
TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />
QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />
THE FABRIC ART PROJECTS WERE GREAT. THE STUDENTS LOVED<br />
THE DYING.<br />
8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />
NONE<br />
9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />
WE LOOK FORWARD TO CONTINUING THESE WORKSHOPS.<br />
1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />
2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />
3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />
4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />
5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />
6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />
7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />
OUR STUDENTS RESPONDED IN A POWERFUL, POSITIVE,<br />
CONSTRUCTIVE, MEANINGFUL WAY TO THIS PROGRAM. IT WAS<br />
MOVING AND THE STUDENTS CONTINUE TO EXPRESS THEIR<br />
REACTION IN WAYS THAT INDICATE THEY TRULY BENEFITED.<br />
8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />
NONE<br />
9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />
OUTSTANDING PROGRAM. IT WAS A PLEASURE TO WORK WITH<br />
THEM. ACTORS WERE EXCELLENT PERFORMERS AND CONNECTED<br />
WELL WITH OUR STUDENTS.<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
Arts in Education Service - School Evaluations <strong>2011</strong>-<strong>2012</strong><br />
Page 242 of 332
ARTIST: PETER CATALANOTTO<br />
CONTRACT #: A7855<br />
TITLE OF PROGRAM: AUTHOR VISIT<br />
TYPE OF PROGRAM: ASSEMBLY<br />
DISTRICT/ SCHOOL: NEW ROCHELLE/WARD ELEM. SCHOOL<br />
# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />
# OF STUDENTS: 110 GRADE(S) K-5<br />
DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 12/13/11<br />
NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />
STANDARD 1 STANDARD 2 STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />
ARTIST: PETER KANE<br />
CONTRACT #: A7683<br />
TITLE OF PROGRAM: SET DESIGNER FOR THE FALL SHOW<br />
TYPE OF PROGRAM: RESIDENCY<br />
DISTRICT/ SCHOOL: KATONAH/LEWISBORO/JOHN JAY HIGH SCHOOL<br />
# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />
# OF STUDENTS: 400 GRADE(S) 9-12<br />
DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 10/24-11/24/11<br />
NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />
STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 X STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />
1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />
1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />
1.<br />
2.<br />
3.<br />
4.<br />
5.<br />
6.<br />
STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />
ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />
EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />
ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />
TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />
QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />
TEACHER AND STUDENT ENJOYED PETER'S PRESENTATIONS. HE<br />
DEMONSTRATED MANY WAYS TO START, CONTINUE AND FINISH A<br />
STORY.<br />
8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />
NONE<br />
9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />
HE WAS GREAT WITH A LARGE AUDIENCE.<br />
1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />
2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />
3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />
4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />
5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />
6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />
7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />
NONE<br />
8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />
NONE<br />
9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />
NONE<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
ARTIST: PETER LERANGIS<br />
CONTRACT #: A8132<br />
TITLE OF PROGRAM: AUTHOR VISIT<br />
TYPE OF PROGRAM: WORKSHOP<br />
DISTRICT/ SCHOOL: CHAPPAQUA/WESTORCHARD ELEM.<br />
# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />
# OF STUDENTS: 123 GRADE(S) 4<br />
DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 1/11/12<br />
NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />
STANDARD 1 STANDARD 2 STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />
ARTIST: PETER LINZ<br />
CONTRACT #: A7987<br />
TITLE OF PROGRAM: PUPPET SHOW - CHARACTER ED<br />
TYPE OF PROGRAM: ASSEMBLY/WORKSH0P<br />
DISTRICT/ SCHOOL: KATONAH/LEWISBORO/KATONAH ELEM. SCHOOL<br />
# OF TEACHERS: 6<br />
# OF STUDENTS: 140 GRADE(S) K-5<br />
DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 6/1/12<br />
NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />
STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 X STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />
1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />
1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />
1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />
2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />
3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />
4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />
5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />
6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />
2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />
3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />
4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />
5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />
6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM?<br />
HE IS WONDERFUL.<br />
Y<br />
WHY?<br />
7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM?<br />
WONDERFUL, FUN.<br />
Y<br />
WHY?<br />
8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />
NONE<br />
9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />
NONE<br />
8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />
NONE<br />
9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />
THANK YOU.<br />
Arts in Education Service - School Evaluations <strong>2011</strong>-<strong>2012</strong><br />
Page 243 of 332
ARTIST: PETER LINZ<br />
CONTRACT #: A8247<br />
TITLE OF PROGRAM: SET LIGHTING SPECIAL EFFECTS FOR THE SHOW -<br />
THE DROWSY CHAPERONE<br />
TYPE OF PROGRAM: RESIDENCY<br />
DISTRICT/ SCHOOL: KATONAH/LEWISBORO/JOHN JAY MIDDLE SCHOOL<br />
# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />
# OF STUDENTS: 73 GRADE(S) 6-8<br />
DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 1/15-3/15/12<br />
NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />
STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 X STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />
ARTIST: PETER LINZ<br />
CONTRACT #: A7679<br />
TITLE OF PROGRAM: SET LIGHTING SPECIAL EFFECTS FOR THE SHOW -<br />
THE TWILIGHT ZONE<br />
TYPE OF PROGRAM: RESIDENCY<br />
DISTRICT/ SCHOOL: KATONAH/LEWISBORO/JOHN JAY MIDDLE SCHOOL<br />
# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />
# OF STUDENTS: 43 GRADE(S) 6-8<br />
DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 10/10-11/8/11<br />
NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />
STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 X STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />
1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />
1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />
1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />
2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />
3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />
4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />
5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />
6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />
7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />
PETER WAS A DELIGHT TO WORK WITH. WE LOOK FORWARD TO<br />
WORKING WITH HIM AGAIN NEXT YEAR.<br />
8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />
NONE<br />
9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />
A FABULOUR FLYING APPARATUS.<br />
ARTIST: PETER LOURIE<br />
TITLE OF PROGRAM: AUTHOR VISIT<br />
TYPE OF PROGRAM: ASSEMBLY<br />
DISTRICT/ SCHOOL:<br />
CONTRACT #: A8389<br />
KATONAH/LEWISBORO/LEWISBORO ELEM.<br />
# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />
# OF STUDENTS: GRADE(S) 3-5<br />
DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE<br />
3/27/12<br />
NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />
STANDARD 1 STANDARD 2 STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
1.<br />
2.<br />
3.<br />
4.<br />
5.<br />
6.<br />
STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />
ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />
EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />
ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />
TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />
QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
N/<br />
N/<br />
7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />
PETER IS AN ABSOLUTE DELIGHT TO WORK WITH. HIS CREATIVITY<br />
AND IMAGINATION ARE UNSURPASSED. THE STUDENTS WERE<br />
THRILLED WITH THE PLANE AND THE GREMLIN. PETER HAS SUCH<br />
A WONDERFUL RAPPORT WITH STUDENTS.<br />
8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />
NONE<br />
9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />
ARTIST:<br />
WE WOULD LOVE TO WORK WITH PETER AGAIN.<br />
PETER LOURIE<br />
TITLE OF PROGRAM: AUTHOR VISIT<br />
TYPE OF PROGRAM: ASSEMBLY/WORKSHOP<br />
DISTRICT/ SCHOOL:<br />
HALDANE/HALDANE ELEM. SCHOOL<br />
CONTRACT #: A7773<br />
# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />
# OF STUDENTS: 57 GRADE(S) 4<br />
DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 10/28/11<br />
NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />
STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 X STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />
1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />
1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />
1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />
2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />
3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />
4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />
5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />
6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />
7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />
NONE<br />
8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />
NONE<br />
9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />
NONE<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />
2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />
3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />
4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />
5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />
6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />
7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />
NONE<br />
8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />
NONE<br />
9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />
WE WERE SEEING MATERIAL FROM NEW ADVENTURES. CONTINUE<br />
TO ADD AND UPDATE PHOTOS. THANKS.<br />
4<br />
4<br />
4<br />
4<br />
4<br />
4<br />
Arts in Education Service - School Evaluations <strong>2011</strong>-<strong>2012</strong><br />
Page 244 of 332
ARTIST: PETER LOURIE<br />
CONTRACT #: A7873<br />
TITLE OF PROGRAM: AUTHOR VISIT<br />
TYPE OF PROGRAM: WORKSHOP<br />
DISTRICT/ SCHOOL:<br />
# OF TEACHERS: 8<br />
BYRAM HILLS/WAMPUS ELEM.<br />
# OF STUDENTS: 600 GRADE(S) 3-5<br />
DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 12/8/11<br />
NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />
STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 X STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />
ARTIST: PETER LOURIE<br />
CONTRACT #: A8755<br />
TITLE OF PROGRAM: AUTHOR VISIT<br />
TYPE OF PROGRAM: ASSEMBLY<br />
DISTRICT/ SCHOOL: SOMERS/SOMERS INTERMEDIATE SCHOOL<br />
# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />
# OF STUDENTS: 830 GRADE(S) 3-5<br />
DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 4/16/12<br />
NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />
STANDARD 1 STANDARD 2 STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />
1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />
1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />
1.<br />
2.<br />
3.<br />
4.<br />
5.<br />
6.<br />
STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />
ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />
EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />
ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />
TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />
QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />
PETER BRILLIANTLY WEAVES TOGETHER HIS ADVENTURES AND<br />
MANY TRIPS IN A WAY THAT STUDENTS CAN RELATE. HE INSPIRES<br />
STUDENTS TO DO RESEARCH, USE RICH DETAILS AND WRITE<br />
ABOUT THEIR OWN EXPERIENCES.<br />
8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />
NONE<br />
9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />
HE HAS IT ALL. HE IS PERSONABLE, PREPARED, PROFESSIONAL<br />
AND HAS GREAT TIMING.<br />
1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />
2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />
3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />
4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />
5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />
6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />
7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />
THE STUDENTS LOVED PETER'S ENERGY AND PASSION FOR HIS<br />
WORK.<br />
8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />
NONE<br />
9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />
NONE<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
ARTIST: PETER LOURIE<br />
CONTRACT #: A7757<br />
TITLE OF PROGRAM: AUTHOR VISIT<br />
TYPE OF PROGRAM: ASSEMBLY/WORKSHOP<br />
DISTRICT/ SCHOOL: KATONAH/LEWISBORO/INCREASE MILLER ELEM.<br />
# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />
# OF STUDENTS: 59 GRADE(S) 4<br />
DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 10/5/11<br />
NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />
STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 X STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />
ARTIST: PETER LOURIE<br />
CONTRACT #: A7604<br />
TITLE OF PROGRAM: AUTHOR VISIT<br />
TYPE OF PROGRAM: ASSEMBLY<br />
DISTRICT/ SCHOOL: HENDRICK HUDSON/FURNACE WOODS ELEM.<br />
# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />
# OF STUDENTS: 73 GRADE(S) 4 & 5<br />
DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 10/26/11<br />
NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />
STANDARD 1 STANDARD 2 STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />
1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />
1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />
1.<br />
2.<br />
3.<br />
4.<br />
5.<br />
6.<br />
STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />
ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />
EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />
ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />
TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />
QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />
PETER ENGAGES THE STUDENTS VERY WELL. HE KEEPS THEM<br />
INTERESTED WITH HIS ENTHUSIASM AND HAS SUCH A WEALTH OF<br />
EXPERIENCES TO DRAW FROM. CLEARLY, PETER LOVES HIS JOB<br />
AS A WRITER AND CONVEYS THIS TO HIS AUDIENCE.<br />
8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />
NONE<br />
9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />
NONE<br />
1.<br />
2.<br />
3.<br />
4.<br />
5.<br />
6.<br />
STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />
ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />
EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />
ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />
TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />
QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />
PETER GIVES A GREAT ACCOUNT OF HIS JOURNEY TO BECOMING<br />
AN AUTHOR.<br />
8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />
NONE<br />
9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />
NONE<br />
Arts in Education Service - School Evaluations <strong>2011</strong>-<strong>2012</strong><br />
Page 245 of 332
ARTIST: PETER LOURIE<br />
CONTRACT #: A8011<br />
TITLE OF PROGRAM: AUTHOR VISIT<br />
TYPE OF PROGRAM: WORKSHOP<br />
DISTRICT/ SCHOOL:<br />
# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />
BRIARCLIFF/TODD ELEM.<br />
# OF STUDENTS: 120 GRADE(S) 4<br />
DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 12/5/11<br />
NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />
STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 X STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />
ARTIST: PETER OSPINA<br />
CONTRACT #: A8709<br />
TITLE OF PROGRAM: CREATING A SCHOOL MURAL<br />
TYPE OF PROGRAM: RESIDENCY<br />
DISTRICT/ SCHOOL:<br />
# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />
OSSINING/ROOSEVELT<br />
# OF STUDENTS: 150 GRADE(S) 5<br />
DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 5/14-18/12<br />
NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />
STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 X STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4 X<br />
1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />
1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />
1.<br />
2.<br />
3.<br />
4.<br />
5.<br />
6.<br />
STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />
ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />
EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />
ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />
TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />
QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />
PETE IS ENGAGING, INFORMATIVE, CURRICULUM ORIENTED AND<br />
LOW MAINTENANCE. WHAT A WONDERFUL PRESENTER. HEARTILY<br />
ENDORSED.<br />
8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />
NONE<br />
9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />
BRAVO PETE. HE IS FANTASTIC.<br />
1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />
2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />
3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />
4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />
5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />
6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />
7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />
THE METHOD AND PRODUCTS WER EXCELLENT.<br />
8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />
NONE<br />
9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />
NONE<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
ARTIST: PETER PIACQUADIO<br />
CONTRACT #: A8625<br />
TITLE OF PROGRAM: TRUMPET PLAYER FOR THE SHOW - ONCE UPON A<br />
MATTRESS<br />
TYPE OF PROGRAM: ASSEMBLY<br />
DISTRICT/ SCHOOL:<br />
# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />
SOMERS/SOMERS HIGH SCHOOL<br />
# OF STUDENTS: GRADE(S) 9-12<br />
DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 3/12-18/12<br />
NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />
STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />
ARTIST: PETER POLINSKI<br />
CONTRACT #: A8643<br />
TITLE OF PROGRAM: DRUMMER FOR THE SHOW - A FUNNY THING<br />
HAPPENED ON THE WAY TO THE FORUM<br />
TYPE OF PROGRAM: ASSEMBLY<br />
DISTRICT/ SCHOOL: PUTNAM VALLEY/PUTNAM VALLEY HIGH SCHOOL<br />
# OF TEACHERS: 3<br />
# OF STUDENTS: 400 GRADE(S) 9-12<br />
DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 4/13-23/12<br />
NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />
STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />
1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />
1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />
1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />
2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />
3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />
4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />
5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />
6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />
2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />
3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />
4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />
5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />
6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM?<br />
NONE<br />
Y<br />
WHY?<br />
7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM?<br />
NONE<br />
Y<br />
WHY?<br />
8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />
NONE<br />
9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />
NONE<br />
8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />
NONE<br />
9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />
NONE<br />
Arts in Education Service - School Evaluations <strong>2011</strong>-<strong>2012</strong><br />
Page 246 of 332
ARTIST: PETER ROYSTON<br />
CONTRACT #: A8550<br />
TITLE OF PROGRAM: BRINGING LITERATURE TO LIFE IMPROV PLAY<br />
WRITING & SHOW<br />
TYPE OF PROGRAM: RESIDENCY<br />
DISTRICT/ SCHOOL: TARRYTOWN/WASHINGTON IRVING ELEM.<br />
# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />
# OF STUDENTS: 200 GRADE(S) 3<br />
DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 2/20-3/12/12<br />
NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />
STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 X STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />
ARTIST: PETER ROYSTON<br />
CONTRACT #: A8197<br />
TITLE OF PROGRAM: BRINGING LITERATURE TO LIFE IMPROV PLAY<br />
WRITING & SHOW<br />
TYPE OF PROGRAM: RESIDENCY<br />
DISTRICT/ SCHOOL:<br />
# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />
IRVINGTON/DOWS LANE ELEM.<br />
# OF STUDENTS: GRADE(S) 2<br />
DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 1/9-3/21/12<br />
NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />
STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 X STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />
1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />
1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />
1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />
2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />
3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />
4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />
5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />
6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />
7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />
HIS IS VERY ENGAGING AND TAKES STUDENTS THROUGH THE<br />
CREATIVE PROCESS FROM TEAM BUILDING TO SCRIPT WRITING TO<br />
HAVING THE CHANCE TO SHINE ON STAGE.<br />
8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />
THIS YEAR WE SHORTENED THE LENGTH OF THE PLAYS AND IT<br />
SEEMED TO WORK WELL FOR STUDENTS. WE RECOMMEND TO<br />
CONTINUE THIS OR COMBINE 2 CLASSES IF WE WANT FOR ONE<br />
LONGER PLAY.<br />
9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />
ARTIST:<br />
NONE<br />
PETER ROYSTON<br />
TITLE OF PROGRAM: SHAKESPEARE<br />
TYPE OF PROGRAM: ASSEMBLY<br />
DISTRICT/ SCHOOL:<br />
CONTRACT #: A8745<br />
IRVINGTON/IRVINGTON MIDDLE SCHOOL<br />
# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />
# OF STUDENTS: GRADE(S) 8<br />
DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE<br />
5/14-6/8/12<br />
NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />
STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 X STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
4<br />
3<br />
1.<br />
2.<br />
3.<br />
4.<br />
5.<br />
6.<br />
STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />
ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />
EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />
ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />
TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />
QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />
STUDENTS ARE HIGHLY ENGAGED IN ALL ASPECTS OF THEATER.<br />
POSITIVE FEEDBACK FROM PARENTS AND STAFF.<br />
8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />
NONE<br />
9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />
GREAT EXPERIENCE FOR ALL.<br />
ARTIST: PETER WIEGAND, JR.<br />
CONTRACT #: A7682<br />
TITLE OF PROGRAM: LIGHTING DESIGNER FOR THE FALL SHOW<br />
TYPE OF PROGRAM: RESIDENCY<br />
DISTRICT/ SCHOOL:<br />
KATONAH/LEWISBORO/JOHN JAY HIGH SCHOOL<br />
# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />
# OF STUDENTS: 400 GRADE(S) 9-12<br />
DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE<br />
10/23-11/24/11<br />
NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />
STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 X STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />
1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />
1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />
1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />
2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />
3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />
4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />
5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />
6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
4<br />
4<br />
1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />
2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />
3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />
4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />
5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />
6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />
THIS PROGRAM MADE SHAKESPEARE ACCESSIBLE AND MOST<br />
IMPORTANTLY ENGAGING FOR MIDDLE SCHOOL STUDENTS.<br />
8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />
ADDED TIME FOR REHEARSALS.<br />
9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />
NONE<br />
7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM?<br />
NONE<br />
8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />
NONE<br />
9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />
NONE<br />
Y<br />
WHY?<br />
Arts in Education Service - School Evaluations <strong>2011</strong>-<strong>2012</strong><br />
Page 247 of 332
ARTIST: PETER WIEGAND, JR.<br />
CONTRACT #: A8312<br />
TITLE OF PROGRAM: LIGHTING DESIGNER FOR THE SHOW - GUYS & DOLLS<br />
TYPE OF PROGRAM: RESIDENCY<br />
DISTRICT/ SCHOOL: KATONAH/LEWISBORO/JOHN JAY HIGH SCHOOL<br />
# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />
# OF STUDENTS: 80 GRADE(S) 9-12<br />
DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 2/1-3/22/12<br />
NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />
STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 X STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />
1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />
ARTIST: PHILADELPHIA MUSEUM OF ART CONTRACT #: A8406<br />
TITLE OF PROGRAM: VIDEO CONFERENCE - THE ART OF SPANISH &<br />
MEXICAN ARTISTS<br />
TYPE OF PROGRAM: ASSEMBLY<br />
DISTRICT/ SCHOOL: PELHAM/PELHAM MIDDLE SCHOOL<br />
# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />
# OF STUDENTS: 200 GRADE(S) 8<br />
DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 2/29-3/16/12<br />
NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />
STANDARD 1 STANDARD 2 STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4 X<br />
1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />
1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />
2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />
3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />
4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />
5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />
6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />
7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />
NONE<br />
8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />
NONE<br />
9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />
NONE<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />
2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />
3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />
4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />
5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />
6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />
7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />
STUDENTS WERE VERY ENGAGED IN THE DISCUSSION OF ART AND<br />
LEARNED ABOUT THE CONNECTION BETWEEN ART, HISTORY AND<br />
CULTURE.<br />
8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />
PUT ARTISTS NAMES ON SLIDES AND DATES THEY LIVED. ALSO,<br />
SHOW MORE OF THE INTRIGUING ARTISTS LIKE DALI AND RIVERA<br />
AND LESS OF THE ONES THAT DO NOT GRAB STUDENTS<br />
ATTENTIONS.<br />
9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />
NONE<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
ARTIST: PHYLLIS JANE MILLER<br />
CONTRACT #: A7923<br />
TITLE OF PROGRAM: KNITTING CRAFTS<br />
TYPE OF PROGRAM: WORKSHOP<br />
DISTRICT/ SCHOOL: CHAPPAQUA/WESTORCHARD ELEM.<br />
# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />
# OF STUDENTS: 9 GRADE(S) 3 & 4<br />
DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 1/11-2/29/12<br />
NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />
STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 X STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />
ARTIST: PLAN & PROCESS, LLC<br />
CONTRACT #: A8172<br />
TITLE OF PROGRAM: JANET ROSEFF - ART IN ARCHITECTURE<br />
TYPE OF PROGRAM: RESIDENCY<br />
DISTRICT/ SCHOOL: IRVINGTON/MAIN STREET SCHOOL<br />
# OF TEACHERS: 2<br />
# OF STUDENTS: 120 GRADE(S) 5<br />
DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 2/6-3/23/12<br />
NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />
STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 X STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4 X<br />
1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />
1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />
1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />
2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />
3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />
4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />
5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />
6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />
7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />
GREAT CLASS. LOVELY INSTRUCTER<br />
8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />
NONE<br />
9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />
NONE<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
N/<br />
1.<br />
2.<br />
3.<br />
4.<br />
5.<br />
6.<br />
STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />
ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />
EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />
ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />
TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />
QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />
JANET IS KNOWLEDGEABLE AND THE STUDENTS LEARNED A LOT.<br />
8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />
NONE<br />
9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />
NONE<br />
Arts in Education Service - School Evaluations <strong>2011</strong>-<strong>2012</strong><br />
Page 248 of 332
ARTIST: PLAN-IT, INC. - BERTRAM KONOWITZ CONTRACT #: A8553A<br />
TITLE OF PROGRAM: DEVELOPING IMPROVISATIONAL SKILLS IN THE<br />
MUSIC CLASSROOM<br />
TYPE OF PROGRAM: RESIDENCY<br />
DISTRICT/ SCHOOL: NEW ROCHELLE/ISAAC YOUNG MIDDLE SCHOOL<br />
# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />
# OF STUDENTS: 100 GRADE(S) 6-8<br />
DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 3/1-22/12<br />
NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />
STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 X STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />
ARTIST: PLAN-IT, INC. - BERTRAM KONOWITZ CONTRACT #: A8553B<br />
TITLE OF PROGRAM: DEVELOPING IMPROVISATIONAL SKILLS IN THE<br />
MUSIC CLASSROOM<br />
TYPE OF PROGRAM: RESIDENCY<br />
DISTRICT/ SCHOOL: NEW ROCHELLE/ALBERT LEONARD MIDDLE SCHOOL<br />
# OF TEACHERS: 5<br />
# OF STUDENTS: 200 GRADE(S) 6-8<br />
DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 3/3-4/19/12<br />
NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />
STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 X STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />
1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />
1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />
1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />
2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />
3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />
4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />
5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />
6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />
7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />
NONE<br />
8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />
NONE<br />
9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />
NICE PROGRAM CHILDREN ENJOYED IT.<br />
4<br />
4<br />
4<br />
4<br />
4<br />
4<br />
1.<br />
2.<br />
3.<br />
4.<br />
5.<br />
6.<br />
STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />
ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />
EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />
ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />
TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />
QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />
THIS PROGRAM IS AN EXCELLENT WAY FOR STUDENTS TO GRASP<br />
THE ESSENTIAL ELEMENTS OF MUSIC.<br />
8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />
NONE<br />
9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />
DR. K BRINGS WHAT WE TEACH INTO AN EVEN MORE FOCUSED<br />
AND INSIGHTFUL LEARNING EXPERIENCE THAT EVOKES LOTS OF<br />
ENTHUSIASTIC RESPONSE.<br />
ARTIST: PLAN-IT, INC. - BERTRAM KONOWITZ CONTRACT #: A8553D<br />
TITLE OF PROGRAM: DEVELOPING IMPROVISATIONAL SKILLS IN THE<br />
MUSIC CLASSROOM<br />
TYPE OF PROGRAM: RESIDENCY<br />
DISTRICT/ SCHOOL: NEW ROCHELLE/COLUMBUS ELEM.<br />
# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />
# OF STUDENTS: 23 GRADE(S) K-5<br />
DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 4/26/12<br />
NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />
STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 X STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />
ARTIST: PLAN-IT, INC. - BERTRAM KONOWITZ CONTRACT #: A8553C<br />
TITLE OF PROGRAM: DEVELOPING IMPROVISATIONAL SKILLS IN THE<br />
MUSIC CLASSROOM<br />
TYPE OF PROGRAM: RESIDENCY<br />
DISTRICT/ SCHOOL: NEW ROCHELLE/JEFFERSON ELEM.<br />
# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />
# OF STUDENTS: 130 GRADE(S) K-5<br />
DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 3/15/12<br />
NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />
STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 X STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />
1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />
1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />
1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />
2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />
3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />
4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />
5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />
6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
N/<br />
N/<br />
1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />
2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />
3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />
4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />
5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />
6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />
IT WAS VERY ENGAGING FOR THE STUDENTS WHO WERE GIVEN<br />
THE CHANCE TO PERFORM, CONDUCT AND IMPROVISE MUSIC.<br />
8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />
NONE<br />
9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />
NONE<br />
7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />
HE WAS A GREAT ADDITION FOR THE DAY. HE ENGAGED THE<br />
STUDENTS IN THE ACTIVITIES. THE CHILDREN WERE VERY<br />
RECEPTIVE AND ENJOYED PARTICIPATING IN THE LESSONS.<br />
8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />
NONE<br />
9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />
NONE<br />
Arts in Education Service - School Evaluations <strong>2011</strong>-<strong>2012</strong><br />
Page 249 of 332
ARTIST: PORT CHESTER COUNCIL FOR THE ART CONTRACT #: A7536I<br />
TITLE OF PROGRAM: LITERACY THROUGH THE ARTS - ANGELA MESSINA -<br />
KINDER TALES<br />
TYPE OF PROGRAM: RESIDENCY<br />
DISTRICT/ SCHOOL:<br />
# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />
PORT CHESTER/EDISON ELEM.<br />
# OF STUDENTS: GRADE(S) K-5<br />
DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 5/1-30/12<br />
NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />
STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 X STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4 X<br />
ARTIST: PORT CHESTER COUNCIL FOR THE ART CONTRACT #: A7537I<br />
TITLE OF PROGRAM: LITERACY THROUGH THE ARTS - ANGELA MESSINA -<br />
KINDER TALES<br />
TYPE OF PROGRAM: RESIDENCY<br />
DISTRICT/ SCHOOL:<br />
# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />
PORT CHESTER/JFK ELEM.<br />
# OF STUDENTS: GRADE(S) K-5<br />
DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 5/1-30/12<br />
NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />
STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 X STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4 X<br />
1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />
1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />
1.<br />
2.<br />
3.<br />
4.<br />
5.<br />
6.<br />
STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />
ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />
EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />
ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />
TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />
QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />
4<br />
4<br />
4<br />
5<br />
4<br />
4<br />
7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />
WONDERFUL STORY THEATER PROGRAM FOR STUDENTS AND<br />
VERY DEVELOPMENTALLY APPROPRIATE FOR THE GRADE LEVEL.<br />
8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />
NONE<br />
9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />
WISH IT WAS MORE THAN FOUR CLASSES.<br />
ARTIST: PORT CHESTER COUNCIL FOR THE ART CONTRACT #: A7539J<br />
TITLE OF PROGRAM: LITERACY THROUGH THE ARTS - ANGELA MESSINA -<br />
KINDER TALES<br />
TYPE OF PROGRAM: RESIDENCY<br />
DISTRICT/ SCHOOL:<br />
PORT CHESTER/PARK AVENUE ELEM.<br />
# OF TEACHERS: 2<br />
# OF STUDENTS: 75 GRADE(S) K-5<br />
DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE<br />
6/1-20/12<br />
NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />
STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 X STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4 X<br />
1.<br />
2.<br />
3.<br />
4.<br />
5.<br />
6.<br />
STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />
ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />
EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />
ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />
TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />
QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />
OUR KINDERGARTEN CHILDREN BENEFIT FROM ANGELA'S CALM<br />
DEMEANOR, HER CHOICE OF AGE APPROPRIATE STORIES AND USE<br />
OF LANGUAGE SKILLS TO ENGAGE IMAGINATIONS.<br />
8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />
NONE<br />
9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />
NONE<br />
ARTIST: PORT CHESTER COUNCIL FOR THE ART CONTRACT #: A7538J<br />
TITLE OF PROGRAM: LITERACY THROUGH THE ARTS - ANGELA MESSINA -<br />
KINDER TALES<br />
TYPE OF PROGRAM: RESIDENCY<br />
DISTRICT/ SCHOOL:<br />
PORT CHESTER/KING STREET ELEM.<br />
# OF TEACHERS: 2<br />
# OF STUDENTS: 75 GRADE(S) K-5<br />
DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 6/1-22/12<br />
NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />
STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 X STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4 X<br />
1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />
1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />
1.<br />
2.<br />
3.<br />
4.<br />
5.<br />
6.<br />
STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />
ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />
EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />
ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />
TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />
QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />
ANGELA BRINGS A QUIET, CALM PRESENCE TO THE STUDENTS<br />
WHO RESPOND IN KIND. THEN SHE ENCOURAGES THEIR CREATIVE<br />
RESPONSES TO STORIES AND THEATER GAMES.<br />
8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />
NONE<br />
9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />
NONE<br />
1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />
2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />
3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />
4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />
5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />
6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />
7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />
THE STUDENTS WERE ENGAGED AND EXCITED TO TAKE PART IN<br />
THE STORY PLAYS. NEW VOCABULARY WAS EXPLAINED IN A<br />
VARIETY OF WAYS.<br />
8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />
NONE<br />
9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />
NONE<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
4<br />
Arts in Education Service - School Evaluations <strong>2011</strong>-<strong>2012</strong><br />
Page 250 of 332
ARTIST: PORT CHESTER COUNCIL FOR THE ART CONTRACT #: A7539I<br />
TITLE OF PROGRAM: LITERACY THROUGH THE ARTS - BRIGITTE LORITZ<br />
TYPE OF PROGRAM: RESIDENCY<br />
DISTRICT/ SCHOOL: PORT CHESTER/PARK AVENUE ELEM.<br />
# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />
# OF STUDENTS: 80 GRADE(S) K-5<br />
DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 5/1-30/12<br />
NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />
STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 X STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4 X<br />
ARTIST: PORT CHESTER COUNCIL FOR THE ART CONTRACT #: A7537E<br />
TITLE OF PROGRAM: LITERACY THROUGH THE ARTS - BRIGITTE LORITZ<br />
TYPE OF PROGRAM: RESIDENCY<br />
DISTRICT/ SCHOOL:<br />
# OF TEACHERS: 6<br />
PORT CHESTER/JFK ELEM.<br />
# OF STUDENTS: 26 GRADE(S) K-6<br />
DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 1/1-31/12<br />
NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />
STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 X STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4 X<br />
1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />
1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />
1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />
2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />
3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />
4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />
5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />
6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />
2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />
3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />
4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />
5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />
6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />
STUDENTS LEARN VISUAL ARTS SKILLS THAT CARRY ON INTO<br />
THEIR ACADEMIC LEARNING.<br />
8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />
NONE<br />
9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />
AN AMAZING, REWARDING ART EXPERIENCE AS ALWAYS.<br />
7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />
GIVING STUDENTS AN AREA AND TIME WHEN THEY CAN BE<br />
CREATIVE GIVES STUDENTS AN OPPORTUNITY TO LEARN<br />
DIVERSELY.<br />
8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />
MORE ART CLASSES.<br />
9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />
LOVE HOW BRIGETTE GIVES THEM BACKGROUND KNOWLEDGE<br />
AND INTRODUCES NEW VOCABULARY TO THE CLASS.<br />
ARTIST: PORT CHESTER COUNCIL FOR THE ART<br />
CONTRACT #: A7537A<br />
TITLE OF PROGRAM: LITERACY THROUGH THE ARTS - BRIGITTE LORITZ<br />
TYPE OF PROGRAM: RESIDENCY<br />
DISTRICT/ SCHOOL:<br />
# OF TEACHERS: 6<br />
PORT CHESTER/JFK ELEM.<br />
# OF STUDENTS: 130 GRADE(S) 2<br />
DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 9/6-30/11<br />
NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />
STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 X STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4 X<br />
ARTIST: PORT CHESTER COUNCIL FOR THE ART CONTRACT #: A7536G<br />
TITLE OF PROGRAM: LITERACY THROUGH THE ARTS - BRIGITTE LORITZ<br />
TYPE OF PROGRAM: RESIDENCY<br />
DISTRICT/ SCHOOL:<br />
# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />
PORT CHESTER/EDISON ELEM.<br />
# OF STUDENTS: 87 GRADE(S) K-5<br />
DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 3/1-31/12<br />
NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />
STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 X STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4 X<br />
1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />
1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />
1.<br />
2.<br />
3.<br />
4.<br />
5.<br />
6.<br />
STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />
ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />
EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />
ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />
TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />
QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />
BRIGETTE IS AN EXPERIENCED PROFESSIONAL WHOSE ACTIVITIES<br />
ARE AGE APPROPRIATE AND VERY ENGAGING.<br />
8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />
NONE<br />
9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />
NONE<br />
1.<br />
2.<br />
3.<br />
4.<br />
5.<br />
6.<br />
STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />
ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />
EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />
ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />
TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />
QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />
BRIGITTE KNOWS HOW TO ENCOURAGE AND TEACH STUDENTS TO<br />
LOVE ART NO MATTER WHAT THEIR ABILITIES ARE.<br />
8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />
NONE<br />
9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />
STUDENTS LOVE TO LEARN FROM BRIGITTE.<br />
Arts in Education Service - School Evaluations <strong>2011</strong>-<strong>2012</strong><br />
Page 251 of 332
ARTIST: PORT CHESTER COUNCIL FOR THE ART CONTRACT #: A7538I<br />
TITLE OF PROGRAM: LITERACY THROUGH THE ARTS - BRIGITTE LORITZ<br />
TYPE OF PROGRAM: RESIDENCY<br />
DISTRICT/ SCHOOL: PORT CHESTER/KING STREET ELEM.<br />
# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />
# OF STUDENTS: 71 GRADE(S) K-5<br />
DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 5/1-31/12<br />
NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />
STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 X STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4 X<br />
ARTIST: PORT CHESTER COUNCIL FOR THE ART CONTRACT #: A7537F<br />
TITLE OF PROGRAM: LITERACY THROUGH THE ARTS - BRIGITTE LORITZ<br />
TYPE OF PROGRAM: RESIDENCY<br />
DISTRICT/ SCHOOL:<br />
# OF TEACHERS: 6<br />
PORT CHESTER/JFK ELEM.<br />
# OF STUDENTS: 150 GRADE(S) K-5<br />
DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 2/1-29/12<br />
NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />
STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 X STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4 X<br />
1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />
1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />
1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />
2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />
3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />
4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />
5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />
6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />
7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />
STUDENTS NEED ART NOW MORE THAN EVER TO BALANCE THE<br />
TESTING FRENZY.<br />
8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />
NONE<br />
9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />
SCHEDULING IS EXTREMELY DIFFICULT AND NO FAULT OF THE<br />
ARTIST. I DO NOT KNOW HOW TO SOLVE THAT PROBLEM.<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
1.<br />
2.<br />
3.<br />
4.<br />
5.<br />
6.<br />
STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />
ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />
EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />
ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />
TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />
QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />
THE STUDENTS WERE CONSTANTLY INVOLVED IN ALL ACTIVITIES<br />
AND THEY ENJOYED BEING EXPOSED TO ART AND USEAGE OF ART<br />
UTENSILS.<br />
8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />
MAYBE CONNECT SOME LESSONS TO LITERACY IF TIME PERMITS.<br />
9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />
NONE<br />
ARTIST: PORT CHESTER COUNCIL FOR THE ART CONTRACT #: A7536A<br />
TITLE OF PROGRAM: LITERACY THROUGH THE ARTS - CAMILLE LINEN<br />
TYPE OF PROGRAM: RESIDENCY<br />
DISTRICT/ SCHOOL:<br />
# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />
PORT CHESTER/EDISON ELEM.<br />
# OF STUDENTS: GRADE(S) K-5<br />
DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 11/1-30/11<br />
NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />
STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 X STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4 X<br />
1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />
1.<br />
2.<br />
3.<br />
4.<br />
5.<br />
6.<br />
STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />
ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />
EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />
ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />
TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />
QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />
WORKSHOPS WITH NEW PRINCIPALS TO EXPLAIN THE PROGRAM<br />
AND REQUEST WEB SITE TO CONTAIN UPDATED LITERACY<br />
CURRICULUM.<br />
8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />
NONE<br />
9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />
PRINCIPALS VERY RECEPTIVE TO INCREASED USE OF PROJECT<br />
BASED, MULTI-DISCIPLINED INSTRUCTION AS DEMONSTRATED BY<br />
PROGRAM.<br />
ARTIST: PORT CHESTER COUNCIL FOR THE ART CONTRACT #: A7537J<br />
TITLE OF PROGRAM: LITERACY THROUGH THE ARTS - CAROLEE<br />
BRAKEWOOD - KINDER MUSIC<br />
TYPE OF PROGRAM: RESIDENCY<br />
DISTRICT/ SCHOOL:<br />
PORT CHESTER/JFK ELEM.<br />
# OF TEACHERS: 3<br />
# OF STUDENTS: 150 GRADE(S) K-5<br />
DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE<br />
6/1-20/12<br />
NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />
STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 X STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4 X<br />
1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />
1.<br />
2.<br />
3.<br />
4.<br />
5.<br />
6.<br />
STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />
ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />
EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />
ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />
TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />
QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />
CAROLEE IS VERY DEDICATED AND ORGANIZED. SHE BRINGS A<br />
TRULY PROFESSIONAL APPROACH TO THE STUDENTS AND ALSO<br />
LETS THEIR CREATIVE RESPONSES TAKE OVER.<br />
8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />
NONE<br />
9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />
NONE<br />
Arts in Education Service - School Evaluations <strong>2011</strong>-<strong>2012</strong><br />
Page 252 of 332
ARTIST: PORT CHESTER COUNCIL FOR THE ART CONTRACT #: A7536J<br />
TITLE OF PROGRAM: LITERACY THROUGH THE ARTS - CAROLEE<br />
BRAKEWOOD - KINDER MUSIC<br />
TYPE OF PROGRAM: RESIDENCY<br />
DISTRICT/ SCHOOL:<br />
# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />
PORT CHESTER/EDISON ELEM.<br />
# OF STUDENTS: GRADE(S) K-5<br />
DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 6/1-20/12<br />
NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />
STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 X STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4 X<br />
ARTIST: PORT CHESTER COUNCIL FOR THE ART CONTRACT #: A7538E<br />
TITLE OF PROGRAM: LITERACY THROUGH THE ARTS - CAROLEE<br />
BRAKEWOOD - KINDER MUSIC<br />
TYPE OF PROGRAM: RESIDENCY<br />
DISTRICT/ SCHOOL: PORT CHESTER/KING STREET ELEM.<br />
# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />
# OF STUDENTS: 27 GRADE(S) K-5<br />
DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 1/3/31/12<br />
NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />
STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 X STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4 X<br />
1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />
1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />
1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />
2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />
3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />
4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />
5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />
6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />
7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />
THE PROGRAM IS ESSENTIAL FOR KINDERGARTEN STUDENTS. THE<br />
ARTS ARE AN INTERGRAL PART OF THE CURRICULUM AND THIS<br />
ALLOWS THEM TO BE EASILY ADAPTED.<br />
8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />
POSSIBLY SOME KIND OF GUIDE FOR THE TEACHER TO<br />
SUPPLEMENT LESSONS ON OUR OWN TIME.<br />
9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />
NONE<br />
ARTIST: PORT CHESTER COUNCIL FOR THE ART CONTRACT #: A7538D<br />
TITLE OF PROGRAM: LITERACY THROUGH THE ARTS - DANA RUSTON<br />
TYPE OF PROGRAM: RESIDENCY<br />
DISTRICT/ SCHOOL:<br />
PORT CHESTER/KING STREET ELEM.<br />
# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />
# OF STUDENTS: 75 GRADE(S) K-4<br />
DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE<br />
12/1-31/11<br />
NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />
STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 X STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4 X<br />
1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />
4<br />
4<br />
4<br />
5<br />
4<br />
N/<br />
1.<br />
2.<br />
3.<br />
4.<br />
5.<br />
6.<br />
STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />
ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />
EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />
ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />
TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />
QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />
STUDENTS ARE ENGAGED IN ALL ACTIVITIES. THE COMBINATION<br />
OF STORYTELLING AND MUSIC IS A BIG MOTIVATION.<br />
8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />
NONE<br />
9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />
NONE<br />
ARTIST: PORT CHESTER COUNCIL FOR THE ART CONTRACT #: A7537C<br />
TITLE OF PROGRAM: LITERACY THROUGH THE ARTS - FRANK SAN<br />
MARCO - NATIVE AMERICAN<br />
TYPE OF PROGRAM: RESIDENCY<br />
DISTRICT/ SCHOOL:<br />
PORT CHESTER/JFK ELEM.<br />
# OF TEACHERS: 2<br />
# OF STUDENTS: 100 GRADE(S) K-5<br />
DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 11/1-30/11<br />
NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />
STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 X STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4 X<br />
1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />
1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />
2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />
3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />
4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />
5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />
6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />
7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />
DANA HELPED STUDENTS DEVELOP SKILLS THEY NOW USE IN<br />
THEIR DAILY WORK.<br />
8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />
IF POSSIBLE, CONDENSE PROGRAM INTO FEWER WEEKS.<br />
9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />
THANK YOU DANA.<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
N/<br />
N/<br />
1.<br />
2.<br />
3.<br />
4.<br />
5.<br />
6.<br />
STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />
ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />
EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />
ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />
TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />
QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
N/<br />
7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />
THIS IS AN AUTHENTIC PRESENTATION OF NATIVE AMERICAN<br />
CULTURE AND LORE DONE IN HISTORICALLY ACCURATE DETAIL.<br />
FRANK SAN MARCO IS ENGAGING AND INSPIRING.<br />
8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />
NONE<br />
9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />
NONE<br />
Arts in Education Service - School Evaluations <strong>2011</strong>-<strong>2012</strong><br />
Page 253 of 332
ARTIST: PORT CHESTER COUNCIL FOR THE ART CONTRACT #: A7536E<br />
TITLE OF PROGRAM: LITERACY THROUGH THE ARTS - GRACE MORA<br />
TYPE OF PROGRAM: RESIDENCY<br />
DISTRICT/ SCHOOL:<br />
# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />
PORT CHESTER/EDISON ELEM.<br />
# OF STUDENTS: GRADE(S) K-5<br />
DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 1/1-31/12<br />
NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />
STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 X STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4 X<br />
ARTIST: PORT CHESTER COUNCIL FOR THE ART CONTRACT #: A7539B<br />
TITLE OF PROGRAM: LITERACY THROUGH THE ARTS - GRACE MORA<br />
TYPE OF PROGRAM: RESIDENCY<br />
DISTRICT/ SCHOOL: PORT CHESTER/PARK AVENUE ELEM.<br />
# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />
# OF STUDENTS: 75 GRADE(S) K-5<br />
DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 10/1-30/11<br />
NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />
STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 X STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4 X<br />
1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />
1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />
1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />
2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />
3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />
4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />
5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />
6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />
2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />
3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />
4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />
5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />
6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM?<br />
GRACE IS A TRUE GIFT TO THE STUDENTS.<br />
8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />
NONE<br />
9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />
NONE<br />
Y<br />
WHY?<br />
7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />
THE STUDENTS HAVE THE OPPORTUNITY TO EXPRESS<br />
THEMSELVES, USE THEIR IMAGINATION AND POSITIVELY SHOW<br />
THEIR FEELINGS THROUGH THIS MEDIA.<br />
8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />
NONE<br />
9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />
MORE DANCE AND MOVEMENT, i.e. HIP HOP.<br />
ARTIST: PORT CHESTER COUNCIL FOR THE ART<br />
CONTRACT #: A7539A<br />
TITLE OF PROGRAM: LITERACY THROUGH THE ARTS - GRACE MORA<br />
TYPE OF PROGRAM: RESIDENCY<br />
DISTRICT/ SCHOOL: PORT CHESTER/PARK AVENUE ELEM.<br />
# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />
# OF STUDENTS: 100 GRADE(S) 4 & 5<br />
DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 9/6-30/11<br />
NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />
STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 X STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4 X<br />
ARTIST: PORT CHESTER COUNCIL FOR THE ART CONTRACT #: A7539F<br />
TITLE OF PROGRAM: LITERACY THROUGH THE ARTS - GRACE MORA<br />
TYPE OF PROGRAM: RESIDENCY<br />
DISTRICT/ SCHOOL: PORT CHESTER/PARK AVENUE ELEM.<br />
# OF TEACHERS: 3<br />
# OF STUDENTS: 27 GRADE(S) K-5<br />
DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 2/1-29/12<br />
NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />
STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 X STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4 X<br />
1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />
1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />
1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />
2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />
3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />
4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />
5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />
6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />
7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />
THIS CLASS WAS ABOUT PLANNING AND DESIGNING A MURAL<br />
DEPICTING LOCAL HISTORY.<br />
8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />
NONE<br />
9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />
NONE<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />
2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />
3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />
4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />
5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />
6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />
7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />
MS. MORA IS WONDERFUL THE THE STUDENTS AND FINDS WAYS<br />
TO INCORPORATE ART WITH EDUCATION. SHE IS WELL<br />
RESPECTED BY ALL.<br />
8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />
NONE<br />
9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />
SHE IS VERY ORGANIZED AND HAD GREAT CONTROL OVER THE<br />
GROUP.<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
Arts in Education Service - School Evaluations <strong>2011</strong>-<strong>2012</strong><br />
Page 254 of 332
ARTIST: PORT CHESTER COUNCIL FOR THE ART CONTRACT #: A7539E<br />
TITLE OF PROGRAM: LITERACY THROUGH THE ARTS - GRACE MORA<br />
TYPE OF PROGRAM: RESIDENCY<br />
DISTRICT/ SCHOOL: PORT CHESTER/PARK AVENUE ELEM.<br />
# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />
# OF STUDENTS: 27 GRADE(S) K-5<br />
DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 1/3-31/12<br />
NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />
STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 X STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4 X<br />
ARTIST: PORT CHESTER COUNCIL FOR THE ART CONTRACT #: A7536D<br />
TITLE OF PROGRAM: LITERACY THROUGH THE ARTS - GRACE MORA<br />
TYPE OF PROGRAM: RESIDENCY<br />
DISTRICT/ SCHOOL:<br />
# OF TEACHERS: 3<br />
PORT CHESTER/EDISON ELEM.<br />
# OF STUDENTS: GRADE(S) K-5<br />
DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 12/1-31/11<br />
NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />
STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 X STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4 X<br />
1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />
1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />
1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />
2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />
3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />
4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />
5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />
6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />
7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />
THE PROGRAM ENHANCED THE CURRICULUM; STUDENTS WERE<br />
EXPOSED TO A CREATIVE OUTLET FOR EXPRESSION THAT WAS<br />
VITAL TO OVERALL INTELLECTUAL GROWTH.<br />
8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />
NONE<br />
9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />
NONE<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />
2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />
3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />
4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />
5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />
6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />
7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />
GRACE IS AN INSPIRATION FOR STUDENTS. SHE WORKS<br />
PATIENTLY AND GIVES THEM VERY APPROPRIATE ACTIVITIES.<br />
8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />
NONE<br />
9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />
NONE<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
ARTIST: PORT CHESTER COUNCIL FOR THE ART<br />
CONTRACT #: A7538G<br />
TITLE OF PROGRAM: LITERACY THROUGH THE ARTS - JO ANN BRODY<br />
TYPE OF PROGRAM: RESIDENCY<br />
DISTRICT/ SCHOOL: PORT CHESTER/KING STREET ELEM.<br />
# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />
# OF STUDENTS: GRADE(S) K-5<br />
DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 3/1-31/12<br />
NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />
STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 X STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4 X<br />
ARTIST: PORT CHESTER COUNCIL FOR THE ART CONTRACT #: A7537D<br />
TITLE OF PROGRAM: LITERACY THROUGH THE ARTS - JONATHAN KRUK<br />
TYPE OF PROGRAM: RESIDENCY<br />
DISTRICT/ SCHOOL:<br />
# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />
PORT CHESTER/JFK ELEM.<br />
# OF STUDENTS: GRADE(S) K-5<br />
DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 12/1-22/11<br />
NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />
STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 X STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4 X<br />
1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />
1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />
1.<br />
2.<br />
3.<br />
4.<br />
5.<br />
6.<br />
STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />
ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />
EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />
ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />
TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />
QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />
4<br />
5<br />
5<br />
4<br />
5<br />
5<br />
7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />
JO ANN IS A VERY STRONG EDUCATOR-ARTIST. SHE HAS A LOT OF<br />
HISTORICAL BACKGROUND TO PROVIDE.<br />
8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />
NONE<br />
9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />
NONE<br />
1.<br />
2.<br />
3.<br />
4.<br />
5.<br />
6.<br />
STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />
ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />
EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />
ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />
TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />
QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
N/<br />
7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />
JONATHAN IS A PROFESSIONAL STORYTELLER BUT ALSO A TRUE<br />
HISTORIAN.<br />
8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />
NONE<br />
9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />
NONE<br />
Arts in Education Service - School Evaluations <strong>2011</strong>-<strong>2012</strong><br />
Page 255 of 332
ARTIST: PORT CHESTER COUNCIL FOR THE ART CONTRACT #: A7538C<br />
TITLE OF PROGRAM: LITERACY THROUGH THE ARTS - LOU DEL BIANCO -<br />
STAR TALES<br />
TYPE OF PROGRAM: RESIDENCY<br />
DISTRICT/ SCHOOL: PORT CHESTER/KING STREET ELEM.<br />
# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />
# OF STUDENTS: 75 GRADE(S) K-5<br />
DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 11/1-30/11<br />
NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />
STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 X STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4 X<br />
ARTIST: PORT CHESTER COUNCIL FOR THE ART CONTRACT #: A7536C<br />
TITLE OF PROGRAM: LITERACY THROUGH THE ARTS - LOU DEL BIANCO -<br />
STAR TALES<br />
TYPE OF PROGRAM: RESIDENCY<br />
DISTRICT/ SCHOOL:<br />
# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />
PORT CHESTER/EDISON ELEM.<br />
# OF STUDENTS: 70 GRADE(S) K-5<br />
DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 11/1-30/11<br />
NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />
STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 X STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4 X<br />
1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />
1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />
1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />
2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />
3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />
4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />
5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />
6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />
7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />
STUDENTS WERE ACTIVE PARTICIPANTS. LOU WAS ENGAGING<br />
AND ENTERTAINING.<br />
8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />
NONE<br />
9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />
THIS IS A PROGRAM THAT I LOOK FORWARD TO EACH YEAR<br />
BECAUSE I KNOW MY STUDENTS WILL ENJOY IT AND THEY WILL<br />
LEARN A LOT.<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />
2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />
3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />
4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />
5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />
6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />
7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />
LOU'S STORYTELLING IS PHENOMENAL. HE ENGAGES THE<br />
CHILDREN AND MAKES THEM FEEL A PART OF THE STORY AND<br />
EXPERIENCE.<br />
8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />
NO NEED FOR IMPROVEMENT, JUST KEEP HIM COMING BACK.<br />
9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />
LOU'S STORYTELLING HAS MADE LEARNING WONDERFUL.<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
ARTIST: PORT CHESTER COUNCIL FOR THE ART<br />
CONTRACT #: A7539C<br />
TITLE OF PROGRAM: LITERACY THROUGH THE ARTS - LOU DEL BIANCO -<br />
STAR TALES<br />
TYPE OF PROGRAM: RESIDENCY<br />
DISTRICT/ SCHOOL: PORT CHESTER/PARK AVENUE ELEM.<br />
# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />
# OF STUDENTS: 65 GRADE(S) K-5<br />
DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 11/1-30/11<br />
NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />
STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 X STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4 X<br />
1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />
ARTIST: PORT CHESTER COUNCIL FOR THE ART CONTRACT #: A7536B<br />
TITLE OF PROGRAM: LITERACY THROUGH THE ARTS - MAI KONG<br />
TYPE OF PROGRAM: RESIDENCY<br />
DISTRICT/ SCHOOL:<br />
# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />
PORT CHESTER/EDISON ELEM.<br />
# OF STUDENTS: GRADE(S) K-5<br />
DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 10/1-31/11<br />
NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />
STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 X STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4 X<br />
1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />
1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />
2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />
3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />
4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />
5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />
6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />
7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />
OUR STUDENTS ENJOYED THE SHOW.<br />
8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />
NONE<br />
9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />
NONE<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />
2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />
3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />
4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />
5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />
6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />
7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />
MS. MAI HAS A WONDERFUL WAY WITH MAKING THE STUDENTS<br />
FEEL AS IF THEY ARE ARTISTS. HER DIRECTIONS ARE KEY FOR<br />
UNDERSTANDING.<br />
8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />
NONE<br />
9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />
SHE IS ABSOLUTELY WONDERFUL.<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
Arts in Education Service - School Evaluations <strong>2011</strong>-<strong>2012</strong><br />
Page 256 of 332
ARTIST: PORT CHESTER COUNCIL FOR THE ART CONTRACT #: A7538F<br />
TITLE OF PROGRAM: LITERACY THROUGH THE ARTS - MAI KONG<br />
TYPE OF PROGRAM: RESIDENCY<br />
DISTRICT/ SCHOOL: PORT CHESTER/KING STREET ELEM.<br />
# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />
# OF STUDENTS: 72 GRADE(S) K-5<br />
DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 2/1-24/12<br />
NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />
STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 X STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4 X<br />
ARTIST: PORT CHESTER COUNCIL FOR THE ART CONTRACT #: A7537B<br />
TITLE OF PROGRAM: LITERACY THROUGH THE ARTS - MAI KONG<br />
TYPE OF PROGRAM: RESIDENCY<br />
DISTRICT/ SCHOOL:<br />
# OF TEACHERS: 6<br />
PORT CHESTER/JFK ELEM.<br />
# OF STUDENTS: 138 GRADE(S) K-5<br />
DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 10/1-30/11<br />
NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />
STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 X STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4 X<br />
1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />
1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />
1.<br />
2.<br />
3.<br />
4.<br />
5.<br />
6.<br />
STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />
ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />
EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />
ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />
TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />
QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />
MAI INSPIRES THE STUDENTS TO CREATE. SHE IS PATIENT WITH<br />
INEXPERIENCED ARTISTS. THE STUDENTS ADMIRE HER TALENT.<br />
8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />
NONE<br />
9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />
SHE INTERACTS VERY WELL WITH THE STUDENTS AND THEY<br />
ENJOY HER CLASS.<br />
1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />
2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />
3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />
4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />
5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />
6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />
7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />
IT IS ALWAYS A PLEASURE TO WORK WITH MAI. SHE IS<br />
KNOWLEDGEABLE, PATIENT, AND ALWAYS APPRECIATES THE<br />
CHILDREN'S ART PIECES.<br />
8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />
NONE<br />
9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />
WE VALUE MAIE'S SUGGESTIONS AND ENJOY HER APPROACH<br />
WITH STUDENTS. ALL THE CHILDREN LOVE HER LESSONS AND<br />
SEEING HOW ACCOMPLISHED THEY'VE BECOME AS ARTISTS.<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
N/<br />
5<br />
ARTIST: PORT CHESTER COUNCIL FOR THE ART<br />
CONTRACT #: A7538A<br />
TITLE OF PROGRAM: LITERACY THROUGH THE ARTS - MAI KONG<br />
TYPE OF PROGRAM: RESIDENCY<br />
DISTRICT/ SCHOOL: PORT CHESTER/KING STREET ELEM.<br />
# OF TEACHERS: 3<br />
# OF STUDENTS: 75 GRADE(S) K-5<br />
DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 9/6-30/11<br />
NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />
STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 X STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4 X<br />
ARTIST: PORT CHESTER COUNCIL FOR THE ART CONTRACT #: A7538B<br />
TITLE OF PROGRAM: LITERACY THROUGH THE ARTS - MAI KONG<br />
TYPE OF PROGRAM: RESIDENCY<br />
DISTRICT/ SCHOOL: PORT CHESTER/KING STREET ELEM.<br />
# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />
# OF STUDENTS: 72 GRADE(S) K-5<br />
DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 10/1-31/11<br />
NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />
STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 X STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4 X<br />
1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />
1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />
1.<br />
2.<br />
3.<br />
4.<br />
5.<br />
6.<br />
STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />
ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />
EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />
ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />
TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />
QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />
MAI IS AN INSPIRING TEACHER WHO IS ALSO A SUPPORTIVE AND<br />
PATIENT TEACHER. THE STUDENTS HAVE BEEN PROVIDED THE<br />
INSTRUCTION TO DEVELOP THEIR ARTISTIC CREATIVITY BY<br />
INTERGRATING THEIR KNOWLEDGE OF WORLD ART INTO OUR<br />
CURRICULUM.<br />
8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />
NONE<br />
9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />
WE ARE GRATFUL TO HAVE THIS PROGRAM AT OUR SCHOOL.<br />
1.<br />
2.<br />
3.<br />
4.<br />
5.<br />
6.<br />
STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />
ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />
EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />
ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />
TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />
QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />
MAI INSPIRES THE STUDENTS TO CREATE. SHE IS PATIENT WITH<br />
INEXPERIENCED ARTISTS. THE STUDENTS ADMIRE HER TALENT.<br />
8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />
NONE<br />
9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />
SHE INTERACTS VERY WELL WITH THE STUDENTS AND THEY<br />
ENJOY HER CLASS.<br />
Arts in Education Service - School Evaluations <strong>2011</strong>-<strong>2012</strong><br />
Page 257 of 332
ARTIST: PORT CHESTER COUNCIL FOR THE ART CONTRACT #: A7539G<br />
TITLE OF PROGRAM: LITERACY THROUGH THE ARTS - MERET PIDERMAN<br />
TYPE OF PROGRAM: RESIDENCY<br />
DISTRICT/ SCHOOL: PORT CHESTER/PARK AVENUE ELEM.<br />
# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />
# OF STUDENTS: 60 GRADE(S) K-5<br />
DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 3/1-31/12<br />
NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />
STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 X STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4 X<br />
ARTIST: PORT CHESTER COUNCIL FOR THE ART CONTRACT #: A7536F<br />
TITLE OF PROGRAM: LITERACY THROUGH THE ARTS - MICHELLE MOERITZ<br />
TYPE OF PROGRAM: RESIDENCY<br />
DISTRICT/ SCHOOL:<br />
# OF TEACHERS: 3<br />
PORT CHESTER/EDISON ELEM.<br />
# OF STUDENTS: 70 GRADE(S) K-5<br />
DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 2/29-12<br />
NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />
STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 X STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4 X<br />
1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />
1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />
1.<br />
2.<br />
3.<br />
4.<br />
5.<br />
6.<br />
STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />
ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />
EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />
ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />
TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />
QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />
FLASHBACKS NATIVE DANCE IS A WONDERFUL OPPORTUNITY FOR<br />
OUR STUDENTS TO LEARN ABOUT NATIVE AMERICAN VALUES,<br />
SYMBOLS AND HISTORY. STUDENTS BECOME INSTANTLY<br />
ENGAGED IN ACTIVITIES COMBINING ART, DESIGN, CRAFTS AND<br />
DANCE.<br />
8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />
NONE<br />
9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />
THIS IS A GREAT PROGRAM AND SHOULD REMAIN PART OF THE<br />
CURRICULUM.<br />
ARTIST: PORT CHESTER COUNCIL FOR THE ART CONTRACT #: A7537G<br />
TITLE OF PROGRAM: LITERACY THROUGH THE ARTS - MICHELLE MOERITZ<br />
TYPE OF PROGRAM: RESIDENCY<br />
DISTRICT/ SCHOOL:<br />
PORT CHESTER/JFK ELEM.<br />
# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />
# OF STUDENTS: 100 GRADE(S) K-5<br />
DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE<br />
3/1-31/12<br />
NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />
STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 X STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4 X<br />
1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />
1.<br />
2.<br />
3.<br />
4.<br />
5.<br />
6.<br />
STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />
ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />
EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />
ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />
TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />
QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />
5<br />
5<br />
4<br />
4<br />
4<br />
3<br />
7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />
SINGING ENGAGES ALL LEARNERS AND PROVIDES OPPORTUNITIES<br />
TO TEACH TOLERANCE ALONG WITH THE EXPRESSIVE QUALITIES<br />
OF LANGUAGE.<br />
8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />
CD PLAYER THAT CONSISTENTLY WORKS.<br />
9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />
THANK YOU.<br />
ARTIST: PORT CHESTER COUNCIL FOR THE ART CONTRACT #: A7539D<br />
TITLE OF PROGRAM: LITERACY THROUGH THE ARTS - MICHELLE<br />
MOERITZ - DANCE USA<br />
TYPE OF PROGRAM: RESIDENCY<br />
DISTRICT/ SCHOOL: PORT CHESTER/PARK AVENUE ELEM.<br />
# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />
# OF STUDENTS: 75 GRADE(S) K-5<br />
DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 12/1-30/11<br />
NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />
STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 X STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4 X<br />
1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />
1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />
2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />
3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />
4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />
5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />
6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />
7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />
MICHELLE HAS DONE A WONDERFUL JOB WITH OUR STUDENTS.<br />
SHE HAS A GREAT RAPPORT AND KNOWS THEM BY NAME AND<br />
MAKES SING AND SIGN FUN AND ENGAGING FOR THEM.<br />
8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />
NONE<br />
9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />
NONE<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
1.<br />
2.<br />
3.<br />
4.<br />
5.<br />
6.<br />
STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />
ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />
EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />
ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />
TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />
QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />
STUDENTS LEARNED HISTORY OF THE US THROUGH DANCE AND<br />
MUSIC FROM EACH ERA. THEY ENHANCED MULTIPLE<br />
INTELLIGENCES THROUGH MULTI MODALITY LEARNING.<br />
8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />
NONE<br />
9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />
BRAVO MICHELLE. I LOOK FORWARD TO WORKING WITH THIS<br />
TALENTED ARTIST NEXT YEAR.<br />
Arts in Education Service - School Evaluations <strong>2011</strong>-<strong>2012</strong><br />
Page 258 of 332
ARTIST: PORT CHESTER COUNCIL FOR THE ART CONTRACT #: A7536H<br />
TITLE OF PROGRAM: LITERACY THROUGH THE ARTS - NINA GABRALE<br />
CAVA<br />
TYPE OF PROGRAM: RESIDENCY<br />
DISTRICT/ SCHOOL:<br />
# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />
PORT CHESTER/EDISON ELEM.<br />
# OF STUDENTS: GRADE(S) K-5<br />
DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 4/1-30/12<br />
NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />
STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 X STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4 X<br />
ARTIST: PORT CHESTER COUNCIL FOR THE ART CONTRACT #: A7539H<br />
TITLE OF PROGRAM: LITERACY THROUGH THE ARTS - NINA GABRIELE<br />
CAVA<br />
TYPE OF PROGRAM: RESIDENCY<br />
DISTRICT/ SCHOOL: PORT CHESTER/PARK AVENUE ELEM.<br />
# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />
# OF STUDENTS: 75 GRADE(S) K-5<br />
DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 4/1-30/12<br />
NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />
STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 X STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4 X<br />
1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />
1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />
1.<br />
2.<br />
3.<br />
4.<br />
5.<br />
6.<br />
STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />
ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />
EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />
ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />
TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />
QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />
NINA WAS CREATIVE AND VIBRANT. SHE ENGAGED STUDENTS<br />
WITH HER STORIES AND INSPIRED THEM TO CREATE THEIR OWN<br />
PLAYS.<br />
8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />
NONE<br />
9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />
ALWAYS A PLEASURE TO HAVE HER VISIT.<br />
ARTIST: PORT CHESTER COUNCIL FOR THE ART CONTRACT #: A7538H<br />
TITLE OF PROGRAM: LITERACY THROUGH THE ARTS - NINA GABRIELE<br />
CUVA<br />
TYPE OF PROGRAM: RESIDENCY<br />
DISTRICT/ SCHOOL: PORT CHESTER/KING STREET ELEM.<br />
# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />
# OF STUDENTS: 65 GRADE(S) K-5<br />
DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 4/1-30/12<br />
NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />
STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 X STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4 X<br />
1.<br />
2.<br />
3.<br />
4.<br />
5.<br />
6.<br />
STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />
ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />
EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />
ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />
TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />
QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />
4<br />
4<br />
4<br />
5<br />
N/<br />
N/<br />
7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />
NINA IS PASSIONATE ABOUT WHAT SHE DOES. SHE TRULY ENJOYS<br />
WORKING WITH CHILDREN AND SHARING HER CRAFT.<br />
8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />
NONE<br />
9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />
AN ENJOYABLE EXPERIENCE FOR TEACHERS AND STUDENTS.<br />
STUDENTS LOOK FORWARD TO NINA'S VISIT.<br />
ARTIST: PORT CHESTER COUNCIL FOR THE ART CONTRACT #: A7537H<br />
TITLE OF PROGRAM: LITERACY THROUGH THE ARTS - NINA GABRIELE<br />
CUVA<br />
TYPE OF PROGRAM: RESIDENCY<br />
DISTRICT/ SCHOOL:<br />
# OF TEACHERS: 6<br />
PORT CHESTER/JFK ELEM.<br />
# OF STUDENTS: 133 GRADE(S) K-5<br />
DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 4/1-30/12<br />
NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />
STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 X STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4 X<br />
1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />
1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />
1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />
2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />
3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />
4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />
5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />
6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />
7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />
NONE<br />
8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />
MORE TIME FOR STUDENT STORYTELLING.<br />
9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />
STUDENTS ENJOYED LEARNING NEW VOCABULARY FROM NINA.<br />
THEY APPLIED IT TO THEIR DAILY LIFE.<br />
4<br />
3<br />
3<br />
4<br />
3<br />
N/<br />
1.<br />
2.<br />
3.<br />
4.<br />
5.<br />
6.<br />
STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />
ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />
EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />
ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />
TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />
QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />
5<br />
3<br />
3<br />
5<br />
N/<br />
N/<br />
7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />
WHILE THE INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS IS GREAT, WE WOULD<br />
LIKE TO SEE MORE STUDENTS PERFORMANCES. WE WOULD LIKE<br />
THE STUDENTS TO HAVE SOMETHING TO WORK TOWARD<br />
COMPLETION.<br />
8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />
NONE<br />
9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />
PERHAPS AROUND THE 3RD SESSION, STUDENTS CAN BE GIVEN A<br />
STORY/PLAY TO FINE TUNE. THEN PERFORM THEIR STORIES AT<br />
THE END. OVERALL, THE STUDENTS LOVED IT.<br />
Arts in Education Service - School Evaluations <strong>2011</strong>-<strong>2012</strong><br />
Page 259 of 332
ARTIST:<br />
POTATOE HILL POETRY<br />
TITLE OF PROGRAM: ANDREW GREEN - POETRY<br />
TYPE OF PROGRAM: WORKSHOP<br />
DISTRICT/ SCHOOL:<br />
BRIARCLIFF/TODD ELEM.<br />
CONTRACT #: A8449<br />
# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />
# OF STUDENTS: 61 GRADE(S) 4<br />
DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE<br />
5/15/12<br />
NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />
STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 X STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />
1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />
1.<br />
2.<br />
3.<br />
4.<br />
5.<br />
6.<br />
STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />
ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />
EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />
ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />
TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />
QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />
ANDREW'S VISIT IS ONE OF THE HIGHLIGHTS OF OUR WRITING<br />
PROGRAM. BY THE END OF THE DAY, EVERY CHILD HAS BECOME A<br />
POET.<br />
8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />
NONE<br />
9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />
NONE<br />
ARTIST: PRISMATIC MAGIC<br />
CONTRACT #: A7931<br />
TITLE OF PROGRAM: BLACK HISTORY TRIBUTE LASER LIGHT SHOW<br />
TYPE OF PROGRAM: ASSEMBLY<br />
DISTRICT/ SCHOOL:<br />
OSSINING/ROOSEVELT<br />
# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />
# OF STUDENTS: 304 GRADE(S) 5<br />
DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE<br />
2/28/12<br />
NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />
STANDARD 1 STANDARD 2 STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />
ARTIST: PRISMATIC MAGIC<br />
CONTRACT #: A8073<br />
TITLE OF PROGRAM: AMERICAN PRIDE SPECTACULAR - LASER LIGHT<br />
SHOW<br />
TYPE OF PROGRAM: ASSEMBLY<br />
DISTRICT/ SCHOOL:<br />
KATONAH/LEWISBORO/MEADOWPOND ELEM.<br />
# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />
# OF STUDENTS: 69 GRADE(S) 2<br />
DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE<br />
5/29/12<br />
NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />
STANDARD 1 STANDARD 2 STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />
1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />
1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />
2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />
3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />
4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />
5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />
6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />
7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />
THE LASER PERFORMANCE IS LIKE NOTHING OUR STUDENTS HAVE<br />
EVER SEEN BEFORE.<br />
8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />
LAST YEAR THE VOLUME OF THE MUSIC WAS LOUDER AND MADE<br />
THE EXPERIENCE MORE FUN WITH A FEELING OF BEING AT<br />
CONCERT.<br />
9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />
ARTIST:<br />
NONE<br />
PRISMATIC MAGIC<br />
CONTRACT #: A7835<br />
TITLE OF PROGRAM: HALLOWEEN SPOOKTACULAR - LASER LIGHT SHOW<br />
TYPE OF PROGRAM: ASSEMBLY<br />
DISTRICT/ SCHOOL:<br />
NEW ROCHELLE/DAVIS ELEM. SCHOOL<br />
# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />
# OF STUDENTS: 700 GRADE(S) K-5<br />
DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 10/24/11<br />
NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />
STANDARD 1 STANDARD 2 STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />
4<br />
5<br />
4<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />
1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />
1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />
2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />
3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />
4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />
5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />
6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />
4<br />
4<br />
3<br />
2<br />
4<br />
2<br />
1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />
2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />
3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />
4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />
5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />
6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM?<br />
NONE<br />
Y<br />
WHY?<br />
7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y<br />
THIS IS A GREAT SHOW. THE STUDENTS LOVE IT.<br />
WHY?<br />
8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />
NONE<br />
9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />
NONE<br />
8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />
NONE<br />
9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />
NONE<br />
Arts in Education Service - School Evaluations <strong>2011</strong>-<strong>2012</strong><br />
Page 260 of 332
ARTIST: PRISMATIC MAGIC<br />
CONTRACT #: A7544<br />
TITLE OF PROGRAM: LASER LIGHT SHOW<br />
TYPE OF PROGRAM: ASSEMBLY<br />
DISTRICT/ SCHOOL: CHAPPAQUA/ROARING BROOK ELEM.<br />
# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />
# OF STUDENTS: 450 GRADE(S) K-4<br />
DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 6/20/12<br />
NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />
STANDARD 1 STANDARD 2 STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />
ARTIST: PRISMATIC MAGIC<br />
CONTRACT #: A8479<br />
TITLE OF PROGRAM: LASER LIGHT SHOW - SPRING JAM SECTACULAR<br />
TYPE OF PROGRAM: ASSEMBLY<br />
DISTRICT/ SCHOOL: CHAPPAQUA/WESTORCHARD ELEM.<br />
# OF TEACHERS: 5<br />
# OF STUDENTS: 513 GRADE(S) K-4<br />
DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 3/21/12<br />
NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />
STANDARD 1 STANDARD 2 STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />
1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />
1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />
1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />
2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />
3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />
4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />
5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />
6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />
7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />
PROGRAM WAS ENTERTAINING AND FUN. THE STUDENTS WERE<br />
ENGAGED AND THE LIGHT SHOW WAS VERY APPROPRIATE.<br />
8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />
ALTHOUGH THE LIGHT SHOW WAS TAILORED TO A SPECIFIC<br />
AUDIENCE, THE 20 MINUTE PRE-SHOW COULD BE MODIFIED FOR A<br />
YOUNGER AUDIENCE.<br />
9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />
THIS HIGH ENERGY, FUN ASEMBLY WAS GREAT.<br />
4<br />
5<br />
3<br />
3<br />
5<br />
5<br />
1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />
2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />
3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />
4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />
5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />
6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />
7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />
NONE<br />
8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />
NONE<br />
9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />
NONE<br />
5<br />
5<br />
4<br />
5<br />
5<br />
N/<br />
ARTIST: PRISMATIC MAGIC<br />
CONTRACT #: A8170<br />
TITLE OF PROGRAM: LASER LIGHT SHOW - TEAM CHARACTER ED SHOW<br />
TYPE OF PROGRAM: ASSEMBLY<br />
DISTRICT/ SCHOOL: HENDRICK HUDSON/FURNACE WOODS ELEM.<br />
# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />
# OF STUDENTS: 342 GRADE(S) K-5<br />
DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 1/9/12<br />
NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />
STANDARD 1 STANDARD 2 STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />
ARTIST: PRISMATIC MAGIC<br />
CONTRACT #: A7764<br />
TITLE OF PROGRAM: WINTER HOLIDAY LIGHT SHOW<br />
TYPE OF PROGRAM: ASSEMBLY<br />
DISTRICT/ SCHOOL: NEW ROCHELLE/BARNARD EARLY CHILDHOOD CENT<br />
# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />
# OF STUDENTS: 640 GRADE(S) PRE K-2<br />
DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 12/21/11<br />
NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />
STANDARD 1 STANDARD 2 STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />
1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />
1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />
1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />
2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />
3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />
4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />
5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />
6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />
7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />
GREAT MESSAGE. THERE WAS A GOOD PACE TO THE SHOW, IT<br />
KEPT THEIR ATTENTION.<br />
8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />
IT NEEDS SOME FOLLOW THROUGH TO BETTER CONNECT THE<br />
SONGS. THE MESSAGE WAS A BIT LOST. NOT REINFORCED<br />
ENOUGH.<br />
9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />
LASER SHOW WAS WONDERFUL. FUN AND ENGAGING WITH<br />
EDUCATIONAL MESSAGE.<br />
5<br />
5<br />
4.2<br />
4.1<br />
4.4<br />
5<br />
1.<br />
2.<br />
3.<br />
4.<br />
5.<br />
6.<br />
STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />
ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />
EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />
ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />
TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />
QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />
HE IS THE BEST PRESENTER AND UNDERSTANDS HOW TO RELAY<br />
THE INFORMATION TO OUR STUDENTS.<br />
8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />
NONE<br />
9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />
GREAT JOB.<br />
Arts in Education Service - School Evaluations <strong>2011</strong>-<strong>2012</strong><br />
Page 261 of 332
ARTIST: PROJECT IMPACT<br />
CONTRACT #: A8473A<br />
TITLE OF PROGRAM: GERRY FIERST - INTRO TO THEATER<br />
TYPE OF PROGRAM: RESIDENCY<br />
DISTRICT/ SCHOOL: NEW ROCHELLE/JEFFERSON ELEM.<br />
# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />
# OF STUDENTS: 120 GRADE(S) 1<br />
DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 3/6-8/12<br />
NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />
STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 X STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />
ARTIST: PROJECT IMPACT<br />
CONTRACT #: A7998<br />
TITLE OF PROGRAM: KEVIN BROOKS - INTRO TO IMPRESSIONIST PAINTING<br />
TYPE OF PROGRAM: RESIDENCY<br />
DISTRICT/ SCHOOL: NEW ROCHELLE/JEFFERSON ELEM.<br />
# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />
# OF STUDENTS: 115 GRADE(S) 3<br />
DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 12/5-15/11<br />
NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />
STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 X STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />
1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />
1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />
1.<br />
2.<br />
3.<br />
4.<br />
5.<br />
6.<br />
STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />
ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />
EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />
ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />
TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />
QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />
GERRY IS FANTASTIC WITH CHILDREN. HE GAVE THE STUDENTS<br />
IDEAS TO TELL STORIES AND THEY WORKED ON THEM AT HOME TO<br />
FERFECT THEIR PERFORMANCES. HE IS GREAT.<br />
8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />
NONE<br />
9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />
NONE<br />
1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />
2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />
3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />
4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />
5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />
6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />
7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />
KEVIN IS AMAZING. HIS TEACHING STYLE AND EDUCATIONAL<br />
PHILOSOPHY ENABLES HIM TO CONNECT COMPLETELY WITH<br />
STUDENTS.<br />
8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />
NONE<br />
9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />
NONE<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
ARTIST: PROJECT IMPACT<br />
CONTRACT #: A8473B<br />
TITLE OF PROGRAM: LAURA BOSS - POETRY<br />
TYPE OF PROGRAM: RESIDENCY<br />
DISTRICT/ SCHOOL: NEW ROCHELLE/JEFFERSON ELEM.<br />
# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />
# OF STUDENTS: 100 GRADE(S) 2<br />
DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 5/8 & 9/12<br />
NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />
STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 X STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />
1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />
1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />
2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />
3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />
4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />
5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />
6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />
7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? N WHY?<br />
MS. BOSS SEEMS TO KNOW HER CRAFT BUT DOES NOT PROVIDE<br />
ENOUGH EXPLICIT DIRECTIONS AND STRUCTURE FOR SECOND<br />
GRADERS.<br />
8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />
USE ACTUAL POETRY THAT IS MEANT FOR CHILDREN AT THE<br />
GRADE LEVEL YOU ARE WORKING WITH. TRY TO MAKE IT FUN FOR<br />
YOUNG CHILDREN.<br />
9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />
SHE READ HER POEM ABOUT HER AUNT WHO HAS DABETES AND<br />
CHECKS HER URINE. INAPPROPRIATE FOR 2ND GRADERS.<br />
4<br />
2<br />
2<br />
4<br />
4<br />
1<br />
ARTIST: PROJECT IMPACT<br />
CONTRACT #: A8581<br />
TITLE OF PROGRAM: MARK STANKIEWICZ - BECOMING AN<br />
AUTHOR/ILLUSTRATOR<br />
TYPE OF PROGRAM: RESIDENCY<br />
DISTRICT/ SCHOOL:<br />
NEW ROCHELLE/JEFFERSON ELEM.<br />
# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />
# OF STUDENTS: 120 GRADE(S) K<br />
DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE<br />
4/3-5/12<br />
NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />
STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 X STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />
1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />
1.<br />
2.<br />
3.<br />
4.<br />
5.<br />
6.<br />
STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />
ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />
EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />
ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />
TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />
QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />
MARK IS WONDERFUL WITH THE STUDENTS. THEY MADE A CLASS<br />
BOOK FOR EACH CLASS THAT WILL LIVE IN THE LIBRARY FOR THE<br />
REST OF THE YEAR. FANTASTIC.<br />
8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />
NONE<br />
9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />
NONE<br />
Arts in Education Service - School Evaluations <strong>2011</strong>-<strong>2012</strong><br />
Page 262 of 332
ARTIST: PROJECT IMPACT<br />
CONTRACT #: A8032<br />
TITLE OF PROGRAM: MARK STANKIEWICZ - BECOMING AN<br />
AUTHOR/ILLUSTRATOR<br />
TYPE OF PROGRAM: RESIDENCY<br />
DISTRICT/ SCHOOL: NEW ROCHELLE/JEFFERSON ELEM.<br />
# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />
# OF STUDENTS: 95 GRADE(S) 4<br />
DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 1/10-12/12<br />
NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />
STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 X STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />
1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />
ARTIST: RACHEL VAIL<br />
CONTRACT #: A7914<br />
TITLE OF PROGRAM: AUTHOR VISIT<br />
TYPE OF PROGRAM: ASSEMBLY/WORKSHOP<br />
DISTRICT/ SCHOOL: EASTCHESTER/EASTCHESTER MIDDLE SCHOOL<br />
# OF TEACHERS: 7<br />
# OF STUDENTS: 250 GRADE(S) 6<br />
DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 10/21/11<br />
NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />
STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 X STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />
1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />
1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />
2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />
3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />
4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />
5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />
6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />
7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />
MARK IS VERY GOOD WITH THE STUDENTS IN THAT HE INSPIRES<br />
THEM. HE IS A GREAT MODEL FOR STUDENTS AND IS ABLE TO<br />
EXTRACT THINKING AND PERFORMANCE FROM THEM.<br />
8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />
NONE<br />
9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />
NONE<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />
2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />
3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />
4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />
5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />
6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />
7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />
NONE<br />
8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />
NONE<br />
9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />
NONE<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
ARTIST: RALPH FLETCHER<br />
CONTRACT #: A7519<br />
TITLE OF PROGRAM: AUTHOR VISIT<br />
TYPE OF PROGRAM: ASSEMBLY/WORKSHOP<br />
DISTRICT/ SCHOOL: IRVINGTON/IRVINGTON MIDDLE SCHOOL<br />
# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />
# OF STUDENTS: 125 GRADE(S) 6<br />
DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 4/17/12<br />
NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />
STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 X STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />
ARTIST: RAMZI EL-EDLIBI<br />
CONTRACT #: A8748<br />
TITLE OF PROGRAM: CHOREOGRAPHER - DANCES FROM SOUTH AMERICA<br />
TYPE OF PROGRAM: RESIDENCY<br />
DISTRICT/ SCHOOL:<br />
# OF TEACHERS: 3<br />
PELHAM/PROSPECT HILL ELEM.<br />
# OF STUDENTS: 60 GRADE(S) 3<br />
DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 5/21-25/12<br />
NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />
STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 X STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4 X<br />
1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />
1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />
1.<br />
2.<br />
3.<br />
4.<br />
5.<br />
6.<br />
STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />
ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />
EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />
ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />
TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />
QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />
IT WAS A VERY MEANINGFUL EXPERIENCE. THE STUDENTS WERE<br />
WELL PREPARED AND TOOK ADVANTAGE OF THE QUALITY TIME<br />
SPENT WITH RALPH.<br />
8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />
NONE<br />
9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />
IT WAS WELL WORTH IT.<br />
1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />
2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />
3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />
4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />
5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />
6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />
7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />
HE WAS SO CALM AND PATRIENT AND WAS ABLE TO BREAK IT<br />
DOWN SO ALL STUDENTS WERE SUCCESSFUL.<br />
8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />
NONE<br />
9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />
RAMZI IS EXTREMELY FLEXIBLE AND HARD WORKING.<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
Arts in Education Service - School Evaluations <strong>2011</strong>-<strong>2012</strong><br />
Page 263 of 332
ARTIST: RANDOM FARM KIDS THEATRE, INC. CONTRACT #: A7952<br />
TITLE OF PROGRAM: ALEXIS GRAUSZ & JULIE SCHWARTZ - FREE TO BE<br />
YOU AND ME<br />
TYPE OF PROGRAM: ASSEMBLY/RESIDENCY<br />
DISTRICT/ SCHOOL:<br />
# OF TEACHERS: 3<br />
PELHAM/COLONIAL ELEM.<br />
# OF STUDENTS: 60 GRADE(S) 2<br />
DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 1/6-3/22/12<br />
NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />
STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />
1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />
ARTIST: RANDOM FARM KIDS THEATRE, INC. CONTRACT #: A7901<br />
TITLE OF PROGRAM: THE NEW KID - A MUSICAL<br />
TYPE OF PROGRAM: ASSEMBLY<br />
DISTRICT/ SCHOOL:<br />
# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />
PELHAM/SIWANOY ELEM.<br />
# OF STUDENTS: GRADE(S) 2-4<br />
DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 11/4/11<br />
NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />
STANDARD 1 STANDARD 2 STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />
1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />
1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />
2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />
3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />
4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />
5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />
6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />
7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />
3.5<br />
5<br />
3<br />
4<br />
4<br />
4<br />
STUDENTS WERE EXCITED ABOUT THEIR PERFORMANCE. IT WAS<br />
AGE APPROPRIATE AND FUN. INSTRUCTORS WERE FUN,<br />
ENGAGING AND PROFESSIONAL AND NICE.<br />
8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />
SPACE IS AN ISSUE IN OUR SCHOOL AND THAT IMPACTED QUALITY<br />
OF REHEARSALS. MAKING CHANGES MID REHEARSALS WAS HARD<br />
FOR STUDENTS TO REMEMBER.<br />
9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />
SONGS THAT THE WHOLE GROUP SING TOGETHER SHOULD BE<br />
REHEARSED PRIOR TO LAST DAY.<br />
1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />
2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />
3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />
4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />
5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />
6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />
7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? N WHY?<br />
AT LEAST NOT FOR ELEMENTARY STUDENTS. THEME NOT TOO<br />
MATURE BUT SPECIFIC CONTENT WAS.<br />
8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />
NONE<br />
9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />
NONE<br />
4<br />
4<br />
3<br />
4<br />
4<br />
N/<br />
ARTIST: RANDOM FARM KIDS THEATRE, INC. CONTRACT #: A8095<br />
TITLE OF PROGRAM: THE NEW KID - A MUSICAL<br />
TYPE OF PROGRAM: ASSEMBLY<br />
DISTRICT/ SCHOOL:<br />
# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />
PELHAM/PROSPECT HILL ELEM.<br />
# OF STUDENTS: 200 GRADE(S) 2-5<br />
DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 1/11/12<br />
NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />
STANDARD 1 STANDARD 2 STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />
ARTIST: RANDOM FARM KIDS THEATRE, INC. CONTRACT #: A7871<br />
TITLE OF PROGRAM: THE NEW KID - A MUSICAL<br />
TYPE OF PROGRAM: ASSEMBLY<br />
DISTRICT/ SCHOOL:<br />
# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />
BYRAM HILLS/WAMPUS ELEM.<br />
# OF STUDENTS: 650 GRADE(S) 3-5<br />
DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 11/7/11<br />
NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />
STANDARD 1 STANDARD 2 STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />
1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />
1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />
1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />
2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />
3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />
4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />
5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />
6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />
7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />
EXCELLENT PERFORMANCE AND MESSAGE.<br />
8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />
NONE<br />
9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />
THE PROGRAM WAS EXCELLENT. THE STUDENTS ENJOYED IT AND<br />
THE OVERALL MESSAGE WAS CLEAR.<br />
4<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
1.<br />
2.<br />
3.<br />
4.<br />
5.<br />
6.<br />
STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />
ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />
EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />
ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />
TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />
QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
N/<br />
7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />
PROGRAM SENDS A GREAT MESSAGE TO STUDENTS ABOUT<br />
FITTING IN TO A POPULAR GROUP AND MAKING GOOD DECISIONS.<br />
STUDENTS WERE FANTASTIC. SUPER TALENTED SHOW WAS SO<br />
WELL CHOREOGRAPHED.<br />
8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />
NONE<br />
9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />
MY ONLY CONCERN WAS THAT THE PROGRAM MAY HAVE BEEN A<br />
LITTLE YOUNG FOR THE 3RD GRADES IN OUR SCHOOL.<br />
Arts in Education Service - School Evaluations <strong>2011</strong>-<strong>2012</strong><br />
Page 264 of 332
ARTIST: RAPHAEL F. BLUE (RAY BLUE)<br />
CONTRACT #: A8728<br />
TITLE OF PROGRAM: MUSICAL STORYTELLING - SILENT WARRIOR<br />
TYPE OF PROGRAM: ASSEMBLY<br />
DISTRICT/ SCHOOL: LAKELAND/THOMAS JEFFERSON ELEM.<br />
# OF TEACHERS: 12 # OF STUDENTS: GRADE(S) K-5<br />
DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 5/2/12<br />
NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />
STANDARD 1 STANDARD 2 STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4 X<br />
ARTIST: RAYMOND CLIFTON MATIAS<br />
CONTRACT #: A7578<br />
TITLE OF PROGRAM: RED HAWK DANCERS<br />
TYPE OF PROGRAM: ASSEMBLY<br />
DISTRICT/ SCHOOL: BYRAM HILLS/H.C. CRITTENDEN MIDDLE SCHOOL<br />
# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />
# OF STUDENTS: 250 GRADE(S) 7<br />
DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 10/5/11<br />
NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />
STANDARD 1 STANDARD 2 STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4 X<br />
1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />
1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />
1.<br />
2.<br />
3.<br />
4.<br />
5.<br />
6.<br />
STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />
ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />
EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />
ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />
TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />
QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
N/<br />
7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />
THE PROGRAM HAD THE AUDIENCE TRULY ENGAGED. THE<br />
TOUCHING STORY ENHANCED BY BEAUTIFUL MUSIC AND TOLD IN A<br />
RELAXED CALMING MANNER WAS A PLESANT CHANGE FROM<br />
SOME OTHER PROGRAMS THAT FEEL THEY NEED TO BE LOUD AND<br />
SILLY TO REACH THE STUDENTS.<br />
8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />
NONE<br />
9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />
THE STUDENTS LOVED THE JAZZ MUSIC AND RETAINED THE<br />
MESSAGE OF THE SILENT WARRIOR. GREAT JOB.<br />
ARTIST: RAYMOND CLIFTON MATIAS<br />
TITLE OF PROGRAM: RED HAWK DANCERS<br />
TYPE OF PROGRAM: ASSEMBLY<br />
DISTRICT/ SCHOOL:<br />
OSSINING/PARK SCHOOL<br />
CONTRACT #: A7648<br />
# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />
# OF STUDENTS: 500 GRADE(S) PRE K &<br />
DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE<br />
11/15/11<br />
NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />
STANDARD 1 STANDARD 2 STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4 X<br />
1.<br />
2.<br />
3.<br />
4.<br />
5.<br />
6.<br />
STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />
ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />
EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />
ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />
TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />
QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
N/<br />
7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />
THEY WER KNOWLEDGEABLE AND INTERESTING. THE CHILDREN<br />
WERE ENGAGED AND LOVED THE AUDIENCE PARTICIPATION<br />
PARTS. COSTUMES AND DANCES WERE GREAT.<br />
8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />
NONE<br />
9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />
VERY INFORMATIVE. IMPORTANT TO TALK ABOUT THE<br />
STEREOTYPES OF NATIVE AMERICANS. IT WAS DONE IN A<br />
THOUGHTFUL WAY.<br />
ARTIST: RAYMOND CLIFTON MATIAS<br />
TITLE OF PROGRAM: RED HAWK DANCERS<br />
TYPE OF PROGRAM: ASSEMBLY<br />
DISTRICT/ SCHOOL:<br />
BRIARCLIFF/TODD ELEM.<br />
CONTRACT #: A8096<br />
# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />
# OF STUDENTS: 211 GRADE(S) K-4<br />
DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 12/9/11<br />
NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />
STANDARD 1 STANDARD 2 STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4 X<br />
1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />
1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />
1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />
2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />
3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />
4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />
5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />
6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
N/<br />
1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />
2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />
3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />
4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />
5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />
6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />
3<br />
4<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
N/<br />
7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />
THIS WAS AN EXCELLENT, BEAUTIFUL PRESENTATION THAT<br />
HIGHLIGHTED CULTURAL ASPECTS OF NATIVE AMERICANS.<br />
8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />
NONE<br />
9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />
NONE<br />
7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />
INFORMATIVE AND ENTERTAINING. IT TIED IN WITH NATIVE<br />
AMERICAN CURRICULUM.<br />
8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />
GEAR SPECIFICALLY TO GRADE LEVEL CURRICULUM.<br />
9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />
NONE<br />
Arts in Education Service - School Evaluations <strong>2011</strong>-<strong>2012</strong><br />
Page 265 of 332
ARTIST: REPORTBULLYING.COM<br />
CONTRACT #: A7898<br />
TITLE OF PROGRAM: FRIENDS HELPING FRIENDS SHOW<br />
TYPE OF PROGRAM: ASSEMBLY<br />
DISTRICT/ SCHOOL: KATONAH/LEWISBORO/INCREASE MILLER ELEM.<br />
# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />
# OF STUDENTS: 360 GRADE(S) K-5<br />
DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 10/25/11<br />
NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />
STANDARD 1 STANDARD 2 STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />
ARTIST: REVELATOR'S, INC.<br />
CONTRACT #: A8784<br />
TITLE OF PROGRAM: MARION JONES-ARCHER - WORLD DANCES<br />
TYPE OF PROGRAM: RESIDENCY<br />
DISTRICT/ SCHOOL: MT.VERNON/LONGFELLOW MIDDLE SCHOOL<br />
# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />
# OF STUDENTS: GRADE(S) 7 & 8<br />
DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 4/17-6/21/12<br />
NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />
STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 X STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4 X<br />
1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />
1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />
1.<br />
2.<br />
3.<br />
4.<br />
5.<br />
6.<br />
STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />
ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />
EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />
ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />
TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />
QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />
THE ASSEMBLY WAS EXCELLENT. FOR THE OLDER KIDS HE<br />
TACKLED THE ISSUE HEADON, THE ENTERTAINMENT WAS<br />
SECONDARY. THEY PROVIDED RESOURCES FOR A YEAR LONG<br />
ANTI-BULLYING PROGRAM. THE ASSEMBLY FOR YOUNGER<br />
STUDENTS WAS ONE OF THE BEST, FUNNY, ENTERTAINING AND HE<br />
HAD THE STUDENTS ROLE PLAYING MESSAGES.<br />
8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />
NONE<br />
9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />
NONE<br />
1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />
2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />
3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />
4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />
5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />
6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />
7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />
NONE<br />
8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />
NONE<br />
9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />
NONE<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
ARTIST: RICHARD CONLEY<br />
CONTRACT #: A8066<br />
TITLE OF PROGRAM: WOODWIND PLAYER FOR THE SHOW - BARNUM<br />
TYPE OF PROGRAM: ASSEMBLY<br />
DISTRICT/ SCHOOL: NORTH SALEM/NORTH SALEM MS & HS<br />
# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />
# OF STUDENTS: 200 GRADE(S) 6-12<br />
DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 2/4-12/12<br />
NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />
STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />
1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />
ARTIST: RICHARD DASHNAW<br />
CONTRACT #: A7711<br />
TITLE OF PROGRAM: GUITAR PLAYER FOR THE SHOW - ANNIE GET YOUR<br />
GUN<br />
TYPE OF PROGRAM: ASSEMBLY<br />
DISTRICT/ SCHOOL: LAKELAND/WALTER PANAS HIGH SCHOOL<br />
# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />
# OF STUDENTS: 100 GRADE(S) 9-12<br />
DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 11/14-19/11<br />
NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />
STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />
1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />
1.<br />
2.<br />
3.<br />
4.<br />
5.<br />
6.<br />
STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />
ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />
EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />
ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />
TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />
QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />
RICH IS AN AMAZING MUSICIAN AND AN INCREDIBLE MODEL FOR<br />
STUDENTS TO FOLLOW.<br />
8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />
NONE<br />
9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />
NONE<br />
1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />
2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />
3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />
4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />
5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />
6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />
7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />
NONE<br />
8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />
NONE<br />
9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />
NONE<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
Arts in Education Service - School Evaluations <strong>2011</strong>-<strong>2012</strong><br />
Page 266 of 332
ARTIST: RICHARD DASHNAW<br />
CONTRACT #: A8804<br />
TITLE OF PROGRAM: GUITAR PLAYER FOR THE SHOW - MY FAIR LADY<br />
TYPE OF PROGRAM: ASSEMBLY<br />
DISTRICT/ SCHOOL: LAKELAND/WALTER PANAS HIGH SCHOOL<br />
# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />
# OF STUDENTS: 200 GRADE(S) 9-12<br />
DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 4/30-5/5/12<br />
NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />
STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />
ARTIST: RICHARD ELLIS<br />
CONTRACT #: A8126<br />
TITLE OF PROGRAM: DIKKI ELLIS - MAGIC CIRCUS SHOW<br />
TYPE OF PROGRAM: ASSEMBLY<br />
DISTRICT/ SCHOOL: PLEASANTVILLE/BEDFORD ROAD ELEM.<br />
# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />
# OF STUDENTS: 110 GRADE(S) K<br />
DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 6/18/12<br />
NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />
STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />
1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />
1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />
1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />
2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />
3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />
4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />
5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />
6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />
2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />
3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />
4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />
5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />
6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM?<br />
NONE<br />
8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />
NONE<br />
9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />
NONE<br />
Y<br />
WHY?<br />
7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />
AGE APPROPRIATE, PROFESSIONAL AND KEPT THE STUDENTS<br />
ATTENTION FOR THE ENTIRE PERFORMANCE.<br />
8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />
NONE<br />
9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />
THANK YOU.<br />
ARTIST: RICHARD RICCA<br />
CONTRACT #: A8538B<br />
TITLE OF PROGRAM: CIVIL WAR MEMORABILIA & STORIES<br />
TYPE OF PROGRAM: WORKSHOP<br />
DISTRICT/ SCHOOL: IRVINGTON/IRVINGTON MIDDLE SCHOOL<br />
# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />
# OF STUDENTS: GRADE(S) 7<br />
DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 4/30/12<br />
NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />
STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 X STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4 X<br />
ARTIST: RICHARD RICCA<br />
CONTRACT #: A8538A<br />
TITLE OF PROGRAM: CIVIL WAR MEMORABILIA & STORIES<br />
TYPE OF PROGRAM: WORKSHOP<br />
DISTRICT/ SCHOOL: IRVINGTON/IRVINGTON MIDDLE SCHOOL<br />
# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />
# OF STUDENTS: GRADE(S) 7<br />
DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 4/20/12<br />
NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />
STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 X STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4 X<br />
1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />
1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />
1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />
2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />
3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />
4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />
5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />
6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />
2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />
3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />
4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />
5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />
6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM?<br />
GREAT EXHIBIT.<br />
Y<br />
WHY?<br />
7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM?<br />
PERFECT.<br />
Y<br />
WHY?<br />
8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />
NONE<br />
9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />
NONE<br />
8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />
NONE<br />
9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />
GREAT PRESENTATION.<br />
Arts in Education Service - School Evaluations <strong>2011</strong>-<strong>2012</strong><br />
Page 267 of 332
ARTIST: RICHARD RICCA<br />
CONTRACT #: A7581<br />
TITLE OF PROGRAM: CIVIL WAR MEMORABILIA & STORIES<br />
TYPE OF PROGRAM: WORKSHOP<br />
DISTRICT/ SCHOOL: BYRAM HILLS/H.C. CRITTENDEN MIDDLE SCHOOL<br />
# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />
# OF STUDENTS: GRADE(S) 7<br />
DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 5/21/12<br />
NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />
STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 X STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4 X<br />
ARTIST: RICHARD RICCA<br />
CONTRACT #: A7834<br />
TITLE OF PROGRAM: CIVIL WAR MEMORABILIA & STORIES<br />
TYPE OF PROGRAM: WORKSHOP<br />
DISTRICT/ SCHOOL: PUTNAM VALLEY/PUTNAM VALLEY MIDDLE SCHOOL<br />
# OF TEACHERS: 3<br />
# OF STUDENTS: 150 GRADE(S) 7<br />
DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 5/7/12<br />
NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />
STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 X STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4 X<br />
1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />
1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />
1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />
2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />
3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />
4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />
5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />
6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />
2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />
3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />
4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />
5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />
6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />
4<br />
5<br />
5<br />
4<br />
4<br />
N/<br />
7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM?<br />
VERY WELL PREPARED AND INFORMATIVE.<br />
Y<br />
WHY?<br />
7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />
HE IS SO KNOWLEDGEABLE AND HIS ARTIFACTS ARE AMAZING.<br />
8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />
NONE<br />
9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />
NONE<br />
8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />
NONE<br />
9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />
NONE<br />
ARTIST: RICHARD RICCA<br />
CONTRACT #: A8219A<br />
TITLE OF PROGRAM: CIVIL WAR MEMORABILIA & STORIES<br />
TYPE OF PROGRAM: WORKSHOP<br />
DISTRICT/ SCHOOL: CHAPPAQUA/BELL MIDDLE SCHOOL<br />
# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />
# OF STUDENTS: 195 GRADE(S) 7<br />
DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 5/23/12<br />
NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />
STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 X STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4 X<br />
ARTIST: RICHARD RICCA<br />
CONTRACT #: A8219B<br />
TITLE OF PROGRAM: CIVIL WAR MEMORABILIA & STORIES<br />
TYPE OF PROGRAM: WORKSHOP<br />
DISTRICT/ SCHOOL: CHAPPAQUA/SEVEN BRIDGES MIDDLE SCHOOL<br />
# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />
# OF STUDENTS: GRADE(S) 7<br />
DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 5/24-25/12<br />
NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />
STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 X STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4 X<br />
1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />
1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />
1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />
2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />
3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />
4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />
5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />
6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />
7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />
VERY INTERESTING.<br />
8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />
NONE<br />
9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />
NONE<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
4<br />
5<br />
N/<br />
1.<br />
2.<br />
3.<br />
4.<br />
5.<br />
6.<br />
STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />
ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />
EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />
ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />
TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />
QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />
PRESENTATION EXTREMELY INTERESTING AND KEPT STUDENT'S<br />
ATTENTION.<br />
8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />
NONE<br />
9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />
NONE<br />
Arts in Education Service - School Evaluations <strong>2011</strong>-<strong>2012</strong><br />
Page 268 of 332
ARTIST: RICKY MYINT<br />
CONTRACT #: A8529<br />
TITLE OF PROGRAM: TRUMPET PLAYER FOR THE SHOW - ONCE UPON A<br />
MATTRESS<br />
TYPE OF PROGRAM: ASSEMBLY<br />
DISTRICT/ SCHOOL:<br />
# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />
SOMERS/SOMERS HIGH SCHOOL<br />
# OF STUDENTS: 50 GRADE(S) 9-12<br />
DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 3/12-18/12<br />
NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />
STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />
1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />
ARTIST: RIITTA POLLOCK dba RIITTA'S ART STU CONTRACT #: A7559<br />
TITLE OF PROGRAM: PAINTING<br />
TYPE OF PROGRAM: WORKSHOP<br />
DISTRICT/ SCHOOL: KATONAH/LEWISBORO/KATONAH ELEM. SCHOOL<br />
# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />
# OF STUDENTS: 10 GRADE(S) 3 & 4<br />
DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 9/27-11/15/11<br />
NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />
STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 X STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />
1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />
1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />
2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />
3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />
4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />
5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />
6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />
7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />
NONE<br />
8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />
NONE<br />
9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />
NONE<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />
2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />
3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />
4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />
5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />
6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />
7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />
NONE<br />
8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />
NONE<br />
9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />
NONE<br />
4<br />
4<br />
4<br />
4<br />
4<br />
4<br />
ARTIST: RIITTA POLLOCK dba RIITTA'S ART STU CONTRACT #: A7899<br />
TITLE OF PROGRAM: VISUAL ARTIST - THE MASTERS<br />
TYPE OF PROGRAM: RESIDENCY<br />
DISTRICT/ SCHOOL: EASTCHESTER/ANNE HUTCHINSON ELEM.<br />
# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />
# OF STUDENTS: 21 GRADE(S) 3 & 4<br />
DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 10/24-11/10/11<br />
NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />
STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 X STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />
ARTIST: RIITTA POLLOCK dba RIITTA'S ART STU CONTRACT #: A7568<br />
TITLE OF PROGRAM: VISUAL ARTIST - THE MASTERS<br />
TYPE OF PROGRAM: ASSEMBLY<br />
DISTRICT/ SCHOOL: EASTCHESTER/GREENVALE ELEM.<br />
# OF TEACHERS: 12 # OF STUDENTS: 166 GRADE(S) 3-5<br />
DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 1/31-2/16/12<br />
NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />
STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 X STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />
1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />
1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />
1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />
2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />
3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />
4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />
5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />
6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />
7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />
CHILDREN ARE HIGHLY INTERESTED IN THE BIOGRAPHICAL<br />
INFORMATION PRESENTED. THEY ESPECIALLY LOVED CREATING<br />
THEIR OWN ART INSPIRED BY EACH ARTIST.<br />
8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />
GIVE US SHORT BIOGRAPHICAL SUMMARIES FOR EACH ARTIST.<br />
WE STUDY BIOGRAPHIES AND THIS MIGHT FURTHER SUPPORT<br />
WHAT WE TEACH.<br />
9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />
I THOROUGHTLY ENJOYED WATCHING ALL OF MY STUDENTS<br />
ACHIEVE A WONDERFUL DEGREE OF SUCCESS.<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
N/<br />
1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />
2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />
3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />
4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />
5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />
6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />
7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />
RIITA IS PATIENT, KIND AND WONDERFUL WITH THE CHILDREN.<br />
8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />
NONE<br />
9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />
NONE<br />
4<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
Arts in Education Service - School Evaluations <strong>2011</strong>-<strong>2012</strong><br />
Page 269 of 332
ARTIST: RIITTA POLLOCK dba RIITTA'S ART STU<br />
CONTRACT #: A8782<br />
TITLE OF PROGRAM: VISUAL ARTIST - THE MASTERS<br />
TYPE OF PROGRAM: WORKSHOP<br />
DISTRICT/ SCHOOL: EASTCHESTER/WAVERLY EARLY CHILDHOOD CTR<br />
# OF TEACHERS: 10 # OF STUDENTS: 225 GRADE(S) 1<br />
DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 4/23-5/24/12<br />
NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />
STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 X STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />
ARTIST: RITA MARTELL<br />
CONTRACT #: A8051A<br />
TITLE OF PROGRAM: ALL THE WORLD'S A STAGE I<br />
TYPE OF PROGRAM: WORKSHOP<br />
DISTRICT/ SCHOOL:<br />
# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />
PELHAM/PROSPECT HILL ELEM.<br />
# OF STUDENTS: 15 GRADE(S) 1-3<br />
DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 1/9-3/12/12<br />
NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />
STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 X STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />
1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />
1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />
1.<br />
2.<br />
3.<br />
4.<br />
5.<br />
6.<br />
STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />
ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />
EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />
ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />
TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />
QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />
SHE DOES A WONDERFUL JOB ENGAGING THE STUDENTS AND<br />
BRINGING THE GREAT MASTERS TO LIFE. THE STUDENTS LOVED<br />
THE INTERACTIVE, HANDS-ON EXPERIENCE OF CREATING A WORK<br />
OF ART.<br />
8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />
NONE<br />
9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />
IT IS A PLEASURE TO HAVE HER EACH YEAR.<br />
1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />
2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />
3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />
4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />
5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />
6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />
7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />
NONE<br />
8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />
NONE<br />
9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />
NONE<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
N/<br />
ARTIST: RITA MARTELL<br />
CONTRACT #: A8051B<br />
TITLE OF PROGRAM: ALL THE WORLD'S A STAGE II<br />
TYPE OF PROGRAM: WORKSHOP<br />
DISTRICT/ SCHOOL:<br />
# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />
PELHAM/PROSPECT HILL ELEM.<br />
# OF STUDENTS: 15 GRADE(S) 3-5<br />
DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 1/9-3/12/12<br />
NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />
STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 X STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />
ARTIST: RIZA HEQUIBAL PRINTUP<br />
CONTRACT #: A8394<br />
TITLE OF PROGRAM: HARP PLAYER FOR THE SHOW - MY FAIR LADY<br />
TYPE OF PROGRAM: ASSEMBLY<br />
DISTRICT/ SCHOOL: LAKELAND/WALTER PANAS HIGH SCHOOL<br />
# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />
# OF STUDENTS: 200 GRADE(S) 9-12<br />
DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 4/30-5/5/12<br />
NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />
STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />
1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />
1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />
1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />
2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />
3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />
4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />
5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />
6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
N/<br />
1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />
2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />
3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />
4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />
5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />
6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM?<br />
NONE<br />
Y<br />
WHY?<br />
7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM?<br />
NONE<br />
Y<br />
WHY?<br />
8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />
NONE<br />
9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />
NONE<br />
8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />
NONE<br />
9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />
NONE<br />
Arts in Education Service - School Evaluations <strong>2011</strong>-<strong>2012</strong><br />
Page 270 of 332
ARTIST: ROBERT ANTHONY MACK<br />
CONTRACT #: A8682<br />
TITLE OF PROGRAM: PERFORMANCE PRACTICES OF THE MALE VOCALIST<br />
TYPE OF PROGRAM: WORKSHOP<br />
DISTRICT/ SCHOOL: NEW ROCHELLE/NEW ROCHELLE HS<br />
# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />
# OF STUDENTS: 50 GRADE(S) 10-12<br />
DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 4/2-5/12<br />
NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />
STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 X STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />
1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />
ARTIST: ROBERT ARTHURS<br />
CONTRACT #: A8434<br />
TITLE OF PROGRAM: TRUMPET PLAYER FOR THE SHOW - THE DROWSY<br />
CHAPERONE<br />
TYPE OF PROGRAM: ASSEMBLY<br />
DISTRICT/ SCHOOL: KATONAH/LEWISBORO/JOHN JAY MIDDLE SCHOOL<br />
# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />
# OF STUDENTS: 75 GRADE(S) 6-8<br />
DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 3/3-17/12<br />
NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />
STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />
1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />
1.<br />
2.<br />
3.<br />
4.<br />
5.<br />
6.<br />
STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />
ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />
EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />
ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />
TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />
QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
N/<br />
7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />
MR. MACK PRESENTED A VARIETY OF VOCAL TECHNIQUES, WARM<br />
UPS AND PERFORMANCE SKILLS TO IMPROVE BREATHING AND<br />
PLACEMENT. THE STUDENTS WERE VERY RECEPTIVE AND<br />
ENGEGED.<br />
8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />
NONE<br />
9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />
EXCELLENT.<br />
1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />
2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />
3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />
4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />
5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />
6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />
7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />
THE PIT ORCHESTRA WAS AWESOME.<br />
8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />
NONE<br />
9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />
THANK YOU.<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
N/<br />
ARTIST: ROBERT FLANZ<br />
CONTRACT #: A8432<br />
TITLE OF PROGRAM: BASS GUITARIST FOR THE SHOW - THE DROWSY<br />
CHAPERONE<br />
TYPE OF PROGRAM: ASSEMBLY<br />
DISTRICT/ SCHOOL: KATONAH/LEWISBORO/JOHN JAY MIDDLE SCHOOL<br />
# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />
# OF STUDENTS: GRADE(S) 6-8<br />
DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 3/3-17/12<br />
NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />
STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />
ARTIST: ROBERT GERONIMO<br />
CONTRACT #: A8526<br />
TITLE OF PROGRAM: LIGHTING DESIGNER FOR SHOW - ONCE UPON A<br />
MATTRESS<br />
TYPE OF PROGRAM: RESIDENCY<br />
DISTRICT/ SCHOOL:<br />
# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />
SOMERS/SOMERS HIGH SCHOOL<br />
# OF STUDENTS: 50 GRADE(S) 9-12<br />
DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 3/12-18/12<br />
NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />
STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 X STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />
1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />
1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />
1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />
2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />
3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />
4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />
5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />
6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
N/<br />
1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />
2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />
3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />
4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />
5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />
6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM?<br />
THE PIT ORCHESTRA WAS AWESOME.<br />
Y<br />
WHY?<br />
7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM?<br />
NONE<br />
Y<br />
WHY?<br />
8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />
NONE<br />
9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />
NONE<br />
8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />
NONE<br />
9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />
NONE<br />
Arts in Education Service - School Evaluations <strong>2011</strong>-<strong>2012</strong><br />
Page 271 of 332
ARTIST: ROBERT JACOBY<br />
CONTRACT #: A8574<br />
TITLE OF PROGRAM: REED PLAYER FOR THE SHOW - SUGAR<br />
TYPE OF PROGRAM: ASSEMBLY<br />
DISTRICT/ SCHOOL: BRIARCLIFF/BRIARCLIFF HIGH SCHOOL<br />
# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />
# OF STUDENTS: 70 GRADE(S) 9-12<br />
DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 3/4-11/12<br />
NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />
STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />
ARTIST: ROBERT LIPSYTE<br />
CONTRACT #: A7691<br />
TITLE OF PROGRAM: AUTHOR VISIT - THE WRITER'S LIFE<br />
TYPE OF PROGRAM: ASSEMBLY<br />
DISTRICT/ SCHOOL: BREWSTER/HENRY H. WELLS MIDDLE SCHOOL<br />
# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />
# OF STUDENTS: GRADE(S) 8<br />
DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 10/11/11<br />
NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />
STANDARD 1 STANDARD 2 STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />
1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />
1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />
1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />
2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />
3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />
4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />
5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />
6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />
7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />
INVALUABLE EXPERIENCE TO HAVE STUDENTS PLAYING<br />
ALONGSIDE PROFESSIONALS.<br />
8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />
MORE REHEARSAL TIME.<br />
9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />
NONE<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
1.<br />
2.<br />
3.<br />
4.<br />
5.<br />
6.<br />
STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />
ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />
EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />
ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />
TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />
QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />
AS ALWAYS, IT IS A PLEASURE TO HAVE HIM VISIT OUR SCHOOL.<br />
HIS KNOWLEDGE AND EXPERIENCE IS INVALUABLE TO THE<br />
STUDENTS.<br />
8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />
NONE<br />
9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />
NONE<br />
ARTIST: ROBERT ROGERS PUPPET COMPANY CONTRACT #: A8544<br />
TITLE OF PROGRAM: PUPPET WORKSHOP & SHOW<br />
TYPE OF PROGRAM: ASSEMBLY/WORKSHOP<br />
DISTRICT/ SCHOOL:<br />
# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />
PELHAM/PROSPECT HILL ELEM.<br />
# OF STUDENTS: 57 GRADE(S) 2<br />
DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 3/26-30/12<br />
NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />
STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 X STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />
ARTIST: ROBERT SHEPPERSON<br />
CONTRACT #: A8792<br />
TITLE OF PROGRAM: AUTHOR/ILLUSTRATOR VISIT - SANDMAN<br />
TYPE OF PROGRAM: WORKSHOP<br />
DISTRICT/ SCHOOL: NEW ROCHELLE/TRINITY ELEM. SCHOOL<br />
# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />
# OF STUDENTS: 160 GRADE(S) 2<br />
DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 5/30 & 31/12<br />
NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />
STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />
1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />
1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />
1.<br />
2.<br />
3.<br />
4.<br />
5.<br />
6.<br />
STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />
ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />
EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />
ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />
TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />
QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />
THE PROGRAM IS AGE APPROPRIATE. MR. ROGERS HAS AN EASY<br />
GOING, RESPECTFUL MANNER WITH THE CHILDREN.<br />
8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />
NONE<br />
9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />
NONE<br />
1.<br />
2.<br />
3.<br />
4.<br />
5.<br />
6.<br />
STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />
ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />
EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />
ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />
TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />
QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />
HE ENCHANTED STUDENTS WITH HIS BOOKS AND ILLUSTRATIONS.<br />
8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />
NONE<br />
9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />
NONE<br />
Arts in Education Service - School Evaluations <strong>2011</strong>-<strong>2012</strong><br />
Page 272 of 332
ARTIST:<br />
ROBERTA LAWS<br />
CONTRACT #: A8683<br />
TITLE OF PROGRAM: PERFORMANCE PRACTICES OF THE FEMALE<br />
VOCALIST<br />
TYPE OF PROGRAM: WORKSHOP<br />
DISTRICT/ SCHOOL:<br />
NEW ROCHELLE/NEW ROCHELLE HS<br />
# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />
# OF STUDENTS: 50 GRADE(S) 10-12<br />
DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE<br />
4/2-5/12<br />
NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />
STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 X STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />
1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />
1.<br />
2.<br />
3.<br />
4.<br />
5.<br />
6.<br />
STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />
ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />
EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />
ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />
TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />
QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />
MS. LAWS PRESENTED A VARIETY OF VOCAL TECHNIQUES, WARM<br />
UPS AND PERFORMANCE SKILLS TO IMPROVE BREATING AND<br />
PLACEMENT. THE STUDENTS WERE VERY RECEPTIVE AND<br />
ENGAGED.<br />
8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />
NONE<br />
9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />
EXCELLENT.<br />
ARTIST: ROGER POST, JR.<br />
CONTRACT #: A8531<br />
TITLE OF PROGRAM: DRUMMER FOR THE SHOW - ONCE UPON A<br />
MATTRESS<br />
TYPE OF PROGRAM: ASSEMBLY<br />
DISTRICT/ SCHOOL:<br />
SOMERS/SOMERS HIGH SCHOOL<br />
# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />
# OF STUDENTS: GRADE(S) 9-12<br />
DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE<br />
3/12-18/12<br />
NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />
STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />
1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />
ARTIST: ROCHEL GARNER COLEMAN<br />
CONTRACT #: A7579<br />
TITLE OF PROGRAM: MARTIN LUTHER KING AMAZING GRACE SHOW<br />
TYPE OF PROGRAM: ASSEMBLY<br />
DISTRICT/ SCHOOL:<br />
BYRAM HILLS/H.C. CRITTENDEN MIDDLE SCHOOL<br />
# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />
# OF STUDENTS: 650 GRADE(S) 6-8<br />
DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 1/18/12<br />
NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />
STANDARD 1 STANDARD 2 STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4 X<br />
1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />
1.<br />
2.<br />
3.<br />
4.<br />
5.<br />
6.<br />
STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />
ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />
EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />
ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />
TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />
QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
N/<br />
7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />
THIS SHOW WAS SO INFORMATIVE. THE CHILDREN WERE TOTALLY<br />
ENGAGED. THEY LOVED THE MUSIC AND REALLY CONNECTED<br />
WITH THE PERFORMERS.<br />
8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />
NONE<br />
9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />
ARTIST:<br />
GREAT SHOW.<br />
ROGER POST, JR.<br />
TITLE OF PROGRAM: DRUMMER FOR THE SHOW - XANADU<br />
TYPE OF PROGRAM: ASSEMBLY<br />
DISTRICT/ SCHOOL:<br />
CONTRACT #: A8774<br />
CHAPPAQUA/HORACE GREELEY HIGH SCHOOL<br />
# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />
# OF STUDENTS: 200 GRADE(S) 12<br />
DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 4/16-21/12<br />
NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />
STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />
1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />
1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />
2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />
3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />
4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />
5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />
6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />
7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />
NONE<br />
8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />
NONE<br />
9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />
NONE<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
1.<br />
2.<br />
3.<br />
4.<br />
5.<br />
6.<br />
STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />
ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />
EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />
ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />
TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />
QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />
IMPORTANT FOR THE STUDENTS TO LEARN AND SEE HOW ALL THE<br />
COMPONENTS OF A MUSICAL SHOW COME TOGETHER.<br />
8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />
NONE<br />
9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />
NONE<br />
Arts in Education Service - School Evaluations <strong>2011</strong>-<strong>2012</strong><br />
Page 273 of 332
ARTIST: RONALD ROTHENBERG<br />
CONTRACT #: A8433<br />
TITLE OF PROGRAM: DRUMMER FOR THE SHOW - THE DROWSY<br />
CHAPERONE<br />
TYPE OF PROGRAM: ASSEMBLY<br />
DISTRICT/ SCHOOL: KATONAH/LEWISBORO/JOHN JAY MIDDLE SCHOOL<br />
# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />
# OF STUDENTS: 75 GRADE(S) 6-8<br />
DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 3/3-17/12<br />
NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />
STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />
1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />
ARTIST: RONI SCHOTTER<br />
CONTRACT #: A8136<br />
TITLE OF PROGRAM: AUTHOR VISIT<br />
TYPE OF PROGRAM: ASSEMBLY/WORKSHOP<br />
DISTRICT/ SCHOOL: CHAPPAQUA/WESTORCHARD ELEM.<br />
# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />
# OF STUDENTS: 96 GRADE(S) 3<br />
DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 5/2/12<br />
NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />
STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />
1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />
1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />
2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />
3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />
4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />
5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />
6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />
7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />
THE PIT ORCHESTRA WAS AWESOME.<br />
8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />
NONE<br />
9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />
NONE<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />
2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />
3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />
4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />
5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />
6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />
7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />
WE LOVE RONI.<br />
8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />
NONE<br />
9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />
NONE<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
ARTIST: RONI SCHOTTER<br />
CONTRACT #: A7606<br />
TITLE OF PROGRAM: AUTHOR VISIT<br />
TYPE OF PROGRAM: WORKSHOP<br />
DISTRICT/ SCHOOL: HENDRICK HUDSON/FURNACE WOODS ELEM.<br />
# OF TEACHERS: 3<br />
# OF STUDENTS: 57 GRADE(S) 2<br />
DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 12/7/11<br />
NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />
STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />
ARTIST: RONI SCHOTTER<br />
CONTRACT #: A8143<br />
TITLE OF PROGRAM: AUTHOR VISIT<br />
TYPE OF PROGRAM: ASSEMBLY<br />
DISTRICT/ SCHOOL: POCANTICO HILLS/POCANTICO HILLS CENTRAL SCHO<br />
# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />
# OF STUDENTS: 150 GRADE(S) K-4<br />
DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 12/9/11<br />
NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />
STANDARD 1 STANDARD 2 STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />
1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />
1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />
1.<br />
2.<br />
3.<br />
4.<br />
5.<br />
6.<br />
STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />
ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />
EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />
ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />
TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />
QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />
RONI IS THE BEST EXAMPLE OF WRITING PROCESS IN ACTION. SHE<br />
SHARES HER PERSONAL EXPERIENCES IN WRITING THROUGH THE<br />
VARIOUS STEPS, AND INSPIRES YOUNG WRITERS.<br />
8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />
NONE<br />
9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />
WE LOVE RONI.<br />
1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />
2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />
3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />
4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />
5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />
6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />
7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />
RONI DID A WONDERFUL JOB PRESENTING AND SPEAKING WITH<br />
ALL OF OUR STUDENTS.<br />
8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />
NONE<br />
9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />
WE LOOK FORWARD TO INVITING HER BACK.<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
Arts in Education Service - School Evaluations <strong>2011</strong>-<strong>2012</strong><br />
Page 274 of 332
ARTIST: ROSS KAUFMAN dba RED LIGHT FILMS CONTRACT #: A8391<br />
TITLE OF PROGRAM: FILM MAKER<br />
TYPE OF PROGRAM: ASSEMBLY<br />
DISTRICT/ SCHOOL: KATONAH/LEWISBORO/JOHN JAY HIGH SCHOOL<br />
# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />
# OF STUDENTS: 30 GRADE(S) 10-12<br />
DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 4/2/12<br />
NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />
STANDARD 1 STANDARD 2 STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />
ARTIST: ROZ SCHANZER<br />
CONTRACT #: A8419<br />
TITLE OF PROGRAM: AUTHOR/ILLUSTRATOR VISIT<br />
TYPE OF PROGRAM: WORKSHOP<br />
DISTRICT/ SCHOOL: POCANTICO HILLS/POCANTICO HILLS CENTRAL SCHO<br />
# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />
# OF STUDENTS: 30 GRADE(S) 5<br />
DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 1/20/12<br />
NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />
STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />
1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />
1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />
1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />
2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />
3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />
4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />
5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />
6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />
7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />
ROSS WAS AN EXCELLENT PRESENTER AND WE LOOKED<br />
FORWARD TO HAVING HIM VISIT. THE STUDENTS AND STAFF<br />
UNANIMOUSLY AGREED HE WAS INSPIRING AND INFORMATIVE.<br />
8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />
NONE<br />
9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />
WE ARE SO GRATEFUL TO HAVE HAD THIS OPPORTUNITY.<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
1.<br />
2.<br />
3.<br />
4.<br />
5.<br />
6.<br />
STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />
ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />
EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />
ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />
TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />
QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />
5<br />
4<br />
5<br />
5<br />
4<br />
4<br />
7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />
ROZ DID A TERRIFIC JOB SHARING HER EXPERTISE ON THE LEWIS<br />
AND CLARK EXPEDITION. SHE HAD MANY INTERESTING STORIES<br />
TO SHARE ABOUT HER RESEARCH AND ARTWORK FOR THE BOOK.<br />
8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />
NONE<br />
9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />
WE WILL TRY TO INVITE HER TO OUR SCHOOL AGAIN. IT WAS VERY<br />
WORTHWHILE.<br />
ARTIST: RUTH E. MATTHEWS<br />
CONTRACT #: A8864<br />
TITLE OF PROGRAM: ACCOMPANIST FOR CHORAL SHOW<br />
TYPE OF PROGRAM: ASSEMBLY<br />
DISTRICT/ SCHOOL:<br />
# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />
WHITE PLAINS/EASTVIEW MS<br />
# OF STUDENTS: 60 GRADE(S) 6<br />
DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 5/23/12<br />
NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />
STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />
1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />
ARTIST: RYAN BUECKE<br />
CONTRACT #: A8651<br />
TITLE OF PROGRAM: TROMBONE PLAYER FOR THE SHOW - A FUNNY<br />
THING HAPPENED ON THE WAY TO THE FORUM<br />
TYPE OF PROGRAM: ASSEMBLY<br />
DISTRICT/ SCHOOL: PUTNAM VALLEY/PUTNAM VALLEY HIGH SCHOOL<br />
# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />
# OF STUDENTS: 400 GRADE(S) 9-12<br />
DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 4/13-23/12<br />
NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />
STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />
1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />
1.<br />
2.<br />
3.<br />
4.<br />
5.<br />
6.<br />
STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />
ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />
EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />
ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />
TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />
QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />
ALL SCHOOL CHOIRS SHOULD HAVE AN ACCOMPANIST THAT IS AS<br />
SKILLED AS RUTH.<br />
8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />
NONE<br />
9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />
NONE<br />
1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />
2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />
3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />
4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />
5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />
6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />
7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />
NONE<br />
8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />
NONE<br />
9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />
NONE<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
Arts in Education Service - School Evaluations <strong>2011</strong>-<strong>2012</strong><br />
Page 275 of 332
ARTIST: RYAN MOLLER<br />
CONTRACT #: A8352A<br />
TITLE OF PROGRAM: COSTUME DESIGNER FOR SENIOR MUSICAL -<br />
XANADU<br />
TYPE OF PROGRAM: RESIDENCY<br />
DISTRICT/ SCHOOL: CHAPPAQUA/HORACE GREELEY HIGH SCHOOL<br />
# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />
# OF STUDENTS: 200 GRADE(S) 12<br />
DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 2/1-3/8/12<br />
NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />
STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 X STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />
ARTIST: RYAN MOLLER<br />
CONTRACT #: A8352B<br />
TITLE OF PROGRAM: COSTUME DESIGNER FOR SENIOR MUSICAL -<br />
XANADU<br />
TYPE OF PROGRAM: RESIDENCY<br />
DISTRICT/ SCHOOL: CHAPPAQUA/HORACE GREELEY HIGH SCHOOL<br />
# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />
# OF STUDENTS: 200 GRADE(S) 12<br />
DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 3/9-4/21/12<br />
NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />
STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 X STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />
1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />
1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />
1.<br />
2.<br />
3.<br />
4.<br />
5.<br />
6.<br />
STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />
ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />
EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />
ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />
TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />
QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />
THE PROCESS OF COSTUME DESIGN AND CREATION IS A CRITICAL<br />
COMPONENT IN MOUNTING A PRODUCTION.<br />
8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />
NONE<br />
9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />
IT HAS THUS FAR BEEN A PLEASURE WORKING WITH RYAN ON<br />
THIS PART OF THE PRODUCTION.<br />
ARTIST: RYAN ODELL<br />
CONTRACT #: A8068<br />
TITLE OF PROGRAM: PERCUSSION PLAYER FOR THE SHOW - BARNUM<br />
TYPE OF PROGRAM: ASSEMBLY<br />
DISTRICT/ SCHOOL:<br />
NORTH SALEM/NORTH SALEM MS & HS<br />
# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />
# OF STUDENTS: 200 GRADE(S) 6-12<br />
DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE<br />
2/4-12/12<br />
NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />
STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />
1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />
2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />
3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />
4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />
5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />
6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />
7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />
IMPORTANT FOR STUDENTS TO SEE AND LEARN HOW ALL THE<br />
COMPONENTS INCLUDING THE DESIGN AND CREATION OF<br />
COSTUMES COME TOGETHER.<br />
8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />
NONE<br />
9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />
RYAN WAS ENGAGING WITH THE STUDENTS AND INTERESTED IN<br />
THEIR FEEDBACK REGARDING THE DESIGN AND CREATION OF<br />
COSTUMES AND HE WORKED COOPERATIVELY WITH THEM.<br />
ARTIST: SABRINA DOOLITTLE<br />
CONTRACT #: A7889<br />
TITLE OF PROGRAM: TECHNICAL DIRECTOR / THEATRE SKILLS<br />
TYPE OF PROGRAM: RESIDENCY<br />
DISTRICT/ SCHOOL: WHITE PLAINS/WHITE PLAINS HIGH SCHOOL<br />
# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />
# OF STUDENTS: 20 GRADE(S) 9-12<br />
DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 10/24-11/18/11<br />
NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />
STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 X STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />
1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />
1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />
2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />
3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />
4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />
5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />
6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />
7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />
RYAN IS AN INCREDIBLE MUSICIAN. STUDENTS RESPONDED<br />
ENGERLY TO HIS PLAYING.<br />
8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />
NONE<br />
9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />
NONE<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
1.<br />
2.<br />
3.<br />
4.<br />
5.<br />
6.<br />
STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />
ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />
EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />
ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />
TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />
QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />
SABRINA WORKS WELL WITH STUDENTS AND MAINTAINS POSITIVE<br />
RELATIONSHIPS WITH THEM. SHE MAKES HERSELF AVAILABLE AT<br />
ANY TIME TO HELP WITH THE TECHNICAL ASPECTS OF OUR<br />
PROGRAM.<br />
8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />
NONE<br />
9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />
STUDENTS LOVE WORKING ON A STAGE CREW UNDER HER<br />
DIRECTION AND SUPERVISION.<br />
Arts in Education Service - School Evaluations <strong>2011</strong>-<strong>2012</strong><br />
Page 276 of 332
ARTIST: SACRED DRUMS PRODUCTION<br />
CONTRACT #: A8415<br />
TITLE OF PROGRAM: SEAN CLEMENTS - AFRICAN DRUMS & DANCE<br />
TYPE OF PROGRAM: ASSEMBLY<br />
DISTRICT/ SCHOOL: NEW ROCHELLE/JEFFERSON ELEM.<br />
# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />
# OF STUDENTS: 621 GRADE(S) K-5<br />
DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 2/9/12<br />
NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />
STANDARD 1 STANDARD 2 STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4 X<br />
ARTIST: SADECKY'S PUPPETS<br />
CONTRACT #: A8013<br />
TITLE OF PROGRAM: CAROUSEL PUPPET SHOW<br />
TYPE OF PROGRAM: ASSEMBLY<br />
DISTRICT/ SCHOOL: NEW ROCHELLE/COLUMBUS ELEM.<br />
# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />
# OF STUDENTS: GRADE(S) K-5<br />
DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 12/12/11<br />
NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />
STANDARD 1 STANDARD 2 STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />
1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />
1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />
1.<br />
2.<br />
3.<br />
4.<br />
5.<br />
6.<br />
STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />
ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />
EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />
ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />
TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />
QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />
FANTASTIC ASSEMBLY. THE ENTIRE HOUR WAS INTERACTIVE AND<br />
ALL STUDENTS PARTICIPATED ENTHUSIASTICALLY.<br />
8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />
NONE<br />
9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />
WE LOVE BROTHER SEAN.<br />
1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />
2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />
3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />
4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />
5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />
6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />
7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />
NONE<br />
8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />
NONE<br />
9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />
NONE<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
ARTIST: SALLY COCHRAN<br />
CONTRACT #: A8252<br />
TITLE OF PROGRAM: COSTOME DESIGNER FOR THE SHOW - FOR<br />
LYSISTRATA<br />
TYPE OF PROGRAM: RESIDENCY<br />
DISTRICT/ SCHOOL: CHAPPAQUA/HORACE GREELEY HIGH SCHOOL<br />
# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />
# OF STUDENTS: 20 GRADE(S) 9-12<br />
DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 1/16-19/12<br />
NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />
STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 X STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />
ARTIST: SALLY COCHRAN<br />
CONTRACT #: A7531<br />
TITLE OF PROGRAM: COSTOME DESIGNER FOR THE SHOW - THE<br />
DROWSY CHAPERONE<br />
TYPE OF PROGRAM: RESIDENCY<br />
DISTRICT/ SCHOOL: CHAPPAQUA/HORACE GREELEY HIGH SCHOOL<br />
# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />
# OF STUDENTS: 27 GRADE(S) 9-12<br />
DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 9/12-11/19/11<br />
NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />
STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 X STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />
1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />
1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />
1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />
2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />
3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />
4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />
5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />
6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />
7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />
SALLY IS A GIFTED DESIGNER AND GREAT WITH THE STUDENTS.<br />
8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />
NONE<br />
9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />
I ALWAYS LOOK FORWARD TO WORKING WITH HER.<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />
2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />
3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />
4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />
5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />
6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />
7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />
SALLY OUTDID HERSELF THIS TIME. GREAT JOB.<br />
8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />
NONE<br />
9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />
I LOOK FORWARD TO WORKING WITH SALLY AGAIN.<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
Arts in Education Service - School Evaluations <strong>2011</strong>-<strong>2012</strong><br />
Page 277 of 332
ARTIST: SALLY COCHRAN<br />
CONTRACT #: A8762<br />
TITLE OF PROGRAM: COSTUME DESIGNER FOR THE SHOW - OUR TOWN<br />
TYPE OF PROGRAM: RESIDENCY<br />
DISTRICT/ SCHOOL: CHAPPAQUA/HORACE GREELEY HIGH SCHOOL<br />
# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />
# OF STUDENTS: 20 GRADE(S) 9-12<br />
DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 4/23-5/5/12<br />
NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />
STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 X STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />
1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />
ARTIST: SALLY COCHRAN<br />
CONTRACT #: A8380<br />
TITLE OF PROGRAM: COSTUMER DESIGNER FOR THE SHOW - SIX<br />
DEGREES OF SEPARATION<br />
TYPE OF PROGRAM: RESIDENCY<br />
DISTRICT/ SCHOOL: CHAPPAQUA/HORACE GREELEY HIGH SCHOOL<br />
# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />
# OF STUDENTS: 19 GRADE(S) 9-12<br />
DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 2/11-3/12/12<br />
NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />
STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 X STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4 X<br />
1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />
1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />
2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />
3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />
4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />
5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />
6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />
7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />
SALLY IS A GREAT DESIGNER AND WORKS WELL WITH THE<br />
STUDENTS.<br />
8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />
NONE<br />
9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />
I LOOK FORWARD TO WORKING WITH SALLY AGAIN NEXT YEAR.<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />
2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />
3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />
4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />
5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />
6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />
7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />
SALLY IS A GREAT DESIGNER AND WORKS WELL WITH THE<br />
STUDENTS.<br />
8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />
NOEN<br />
9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />
I LOOK FORWARD TO WORKING WITH HER AGAIN.<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
ARTIST: SAMUEL LADLEY<br />
CONTRACT #: A8123<br />
TITLE OF PROGRAM: COLONIAL LIFE & ARTIFACTS<br />
TYPE OF PROGRAM: ASSEMBLY<br />
DISTRICT/ SCHOOL: LAKELAND/THOMAS JEFFERSON ELEM.<br />
# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />
# OF STUDENTS: 75 GRADE(S) 4<br />
DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 3/16/12<br />
NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />
STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 X STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4 X<br />
1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />
ARTIST: SANDRA COFFIN<br />
CONTRACT #: A8512<br />
TITLE OF PROGRAM: TRUMPET PLAYER FOR THE SHOW - BEAUTY AND<br />
THE BEAST<br />
TYPE OF PROGRAM: ASSEMBLY<br />
DISTRICT/ SCHOOL: PLEASANTVILLE/PLEASANTVILLE HIGH SCHOOL<br />
# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />
# OF STUDENTS: 400 GRADE(S) 9-12<br />
DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 3/9-17/12<br />
NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />
STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />
1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />
1.<br />
2.<br />
3.<br />
4.<br />
5.<br />
6.<br />
STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />
ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />
EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />
ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />
TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />
QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />
HE PRESENTED HIS USUAL OUTSTANDING PROGRAM. STUDENTS<br />
WERE INTERESTED, ENGAGED, AND LEARNING THROUGH THE USE<br />
OF ARTIFACTS AND A WORKSHOP WAS A GREAT COLONIAL<br />
EXPERIENCE.<br />
8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />
NONE<br />
9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />
NONE<br />
1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />
2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />
3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />
4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />
5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />
6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />
7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />
HIGH, PROFESSIONAL MUSIC QUALITY.<br />
8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />
NONE<br />
9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />
CONSISTENT, DEPENDABLE SERIVCE PROVIDED.<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
N/<br />
5<br />
N/<br />
Arts in Education Service - School Evaluations <strong>2011</strong>-<strong>2012</strong><br />
Page 278 of 332
ARTIST: SANKOFA DRUM & DANCE TROUP CONTRACT #: A8425B<br />
TITLE OF PROGRAM: KOFI & SANKOFA DRUMMING & DANCING SHOW<br />
TYPE OF PROGRAM: ASSEMBLY/WORKSHOP<br />
DISTRICT/ SCHOOL: LAKELAND/THOMAS JEFFERSON ELEM.<br />
# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />
# OF STUDENTS: GRADE(S) K-5<br />
DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 6/5 & 7/12<br />
NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />
STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 X STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4 X<br />
ARTIST: SANKOFA DRUM & DANCE TROUP CONTRACT #: A8425A<br />
TITLE OF PROGRAM: KOFI & SANKOFA DRUMMING & DANCING SHOW<br />
TYPE OF PROGRAM: ASSEMBLY<br />
DISTRICT/ SCHOOL: LAKELAND/THOMAS JEFFERSON ELEM.<br />
# OF TEACHERS: 4<br />
# OF STUDENTS: 425 GRADE(S) K-5<br />
DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 2/3/12<br />
NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />
STANDARD 1 STANDARD 2 STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4 X<br />
1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />
1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />
1.<br />
2.<br />
3.<br />
4.<br />
5.<br />
6.<br />
STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />
ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />
EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />
ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />
TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />
QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />
THEY KEEPS THE CHILDREN ENGAGED AND WANTING MORE. THEY<br />
SHARED MUCH INFORMATION ABOUT THE CULTURE, MUSIC AND<br />
ART OF AFRICA.<br />
8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />
NONE<br />
9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />
NONE<br />
1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />
2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />
3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />
4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />
5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />
6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />
7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />
IT'S A GOOD MULTI CULTURAL PROGRAM. ENGAGES THE<br />
STUDENTS AND THEY ARE ALLOWED TO PARTICIPATE WITH<br />
SINGING AND MOVEMENT.<br />
8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />
NONE<br />
9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />
WELL DONE. THE TEACHERS AND STUDENTS COULD HAVE<br />
STAYED LONGER THEY WERE SO ENGAGED.<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
ARTIST: SARAH BRETT ENGLAND<br />
CONTRACT #: A8117<br />
TITLE OF PROGRAM: MUSICAL DIRECTOR FOR THE SHOW - FOOTLOOSE<br />
TYPE OF PROGRAM: RESIDENCY<br />
DISTRICT/ SCHOOL: CHAPPAQUA/BELL MIDDLE SCHOOL<br />
# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />
# OF STUDENTS: GRADE(S) 5-8<br />
DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 1/25-3/27/12<br />
NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />
STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 X STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />
ARTIST: SARAH BRETT ENGLAND<br />
CONTRACT #: A8675<br />
TITLE OF PROGRAM: MUSICAL DIRECTOR FOR THE SHOW - PETER PAN<br />
TYPE OF PROGRAM: RESIDENCY<br />
DISTRICT/ SCHOOL: CHAPPAQUA/ROARING BROOK ELEM.<br />
# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />
# OF STUDENTS: 113 GRADE(S) 2-4<br />
DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 3/28-6/3/12<br />
NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />
STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 X STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />
1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />
1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />
1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />
2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />
3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />
4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />
5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />
6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />
7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />
IT'S AN AMAZING PROGRAM. THEY NOT ONLY LEARNED THE<br />
LYRICS BUT THE MEANINGS BEHIND THE WORDS AS WELL.<br />
8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />
NONE<br />
9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />
NONE<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
N/<br />
1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />
2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />
3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />
4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />
5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />
6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />
7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />
NONE<br />
8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />
NONE<br />
9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />
SARAH WAS GREAT WITH THE CHILDREN. SHE WENT OUT OF HER<br />
WAY TO HELP.<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
N/<br />
Arts in Education Service - School Evaluations <strong>2011</strong>-<strong>2012</strong><br />
Page 279 of 332
ARTIST: SARAH E. KNAPP<br />
CONTRACT #: A8822<br />
TITLE OF PROGRAM: SONGWRITING PERFORMANCE<br />
TYPE OF PROGRAM: ASSEMBLY<br />
DISTRICT/ SCHOOL: PUTNAM VALLEY/PUTNAM VALLEY ELEM.<br />
# OF TEACHERS: 3<br />
# OF STUDENTS: 150 GRADE(S) 4<br />
DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 6/20/12<br />
NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />
STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />
ARTIST: SARAH E. KNAPP<br />
CONTRACT #: A8213<br />
TITLE OF PROGRAM: SONGWRITING WORKSHOP<br />
TYPE OF PROGRAM: WORKSHOP<br />
DISTRICT/ SCHOOL: PUTNAM VALLEY/PUTNAM VALLEY MIDDLE SCHOOL<br />
# OF TEACHERS: 3<br />
# OF STUDENTS: 100 GRADE(S) 8<br />
DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 1/17-27/12<br />
NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />
STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />
1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />
1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />
1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />
2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />
3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />
4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />
5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />
6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />
7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />
THE CHILDREN LEARN SO MUCH. THE PERFORMANCE WAS<br />
AMAZING.<br />
8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />
NONE<br />
9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />
NONE<br />
4<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
4<br />
N/<br />
1.<br />
2.<br />
3.<br />
4.<br />
5.<br />
6.<br />
STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />
ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />
EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />
ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />
TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />
QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />
3<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />
SARAH IS AN AMAZING WRITER. SHE IS ABLE TO CONNECT WITH<br />
THE STUDENTS.<br />
8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />
NONE<br />
9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />
THIS PROGRAM WAS HARD AS THERE WERE SOME STUDENTS WHO<br />
HAD NO DESIRE TO REALLY BE IN MUSIC CLASS.<br />
ARTIST: SARAH E. KNAPP<br />
CONTRACT #: A8635<br />
TITLE OF PROGRAM: SONGWRITING WORKSHOP<br />
TYPE OF PROGRAM: WORKSHOP<br />
DISTRICT/ SCHOOL: PUTNAM VALLEY/PUTNAM VALLEY ELEM.<br />
# OF TEACHERS: 4<br />
# OF STUDENTS: 125 GRADE(S) 4<br />
DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 3/19/12<br />
NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />
STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />
ARTIST: SCOTT HICKEY<br />
CONTRACT #: A7680<br />
TITLE OF PROGRAM: DIRECTOR FOR THE FALL SHOW<br />
TYPE OF PROGRAM: RESIDENCY<br />
DISTRICT/ SCHOOL: KATONAH/LEWISBORO/JOHN JAY HIGH SCHOOL<br />
# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />
# OF STUDENTS: 400 GRADE(S) 9-12<br />
DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 10/1-11/20/11<br />
NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />
STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 X STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />
1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />
1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />
1.<br />
2.<br />
3.<br />
4.<br />
5.<br />
6.<br />
STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />
ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />
EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />
ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />
TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />
QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />
IT INCREASES STUDENT INVOLVEMENT AND OWNERSHIP OF WHAT<br />
THEY DO. IT IS A TREMENDOUS OPPORTUNITY FOR OUR STUDENTS<br />
TO PUT THEIR THOUGHTS INTO SONG.<br />
8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />
NONE<br />
9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />
ESPECIALLY NICE THAT THE ARTIST COMES BACK TO HELP THE<br />
CHILDREN PERFORM THE SONG AT THEIR MOVING UP CEREMONY.<br />
1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />
2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />
3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />
4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />
5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />
6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />
7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />
NONE<br />
8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />
NONE<br />
9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />
NONE<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
Arts in Education Service - School Evaluations <strong>2011</strong>-<strong>2012</strong><br />
Page 280 of 332
ARTIST: SCOTT HICKEY<br />
CONTRACT #: A8805<br />
TITLE OF PROGRAM: THEATRE DESIGNER FOR THE ONE ACT PLAY<br />
FESTIVAL<br />
TYPE OF PROGRAM: RESIDENCY<br />
DISTRICT/ SCHOOL: KATONAH/LEWISBORO/JOHN JAY HIGH SCHOOL<br />
# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />
# OF STUDENTS: 100 GRADE(S) 9-12<br />
DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 4/30-5/4/12<br />
NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />
STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 X STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />
1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />
ARTIST: SCOTT HICKEY<br />
CONTRACT #: A8308<br />
TITLE OF PROGRAM: THEATRE DESIGNER FOR THE SHOW - GUYS &<br />
TYPE OF PROGRAM: WORKSHOP<br />
DISTRICT/ SCHOOL: KATONAH/LEWISBORO/JOHN JAY HIGH SCHOOL<br />
# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />
# OF STUDENTS: 50 GRADE(S) 9-12<br />
DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 2/1-3/22/12<br />
NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />
STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 X STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />
1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />
1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />
2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />
3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />
4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />
5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />
6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />
7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />
SCOTT IS AN EXCEPTIONALLY EFFECTIVE TEACHER. HIS<br />
EXPERTISE IS MATCHED BY THE CLARITY OF HIS EXPRESSION.<br />
STUDENTS RESPOND TO HIM ENTHUSIASTICALLY.<br />
8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />
NONE<br />
9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />
NONE<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />
2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />
3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />
4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />
5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />
6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />
7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />
NONE<br />
8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />
NONE<br />
9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />
NONE<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
ARTIST: SCOTT HICKEY<br />
CONTRACT #: A8837<br />
TITLE OF PROGRAM: THEATRE DESIGNER FOR THE SPRING CONCERT<br />
TYPE OF PROGRAM: WORKSHOP<br />
DISTRICT/ SCHOOL: KATONAH/LEWISBORO/JOHN JAY HIGH SCHOOL<br />
# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />
# OF STUDENTS: 450 GRADE(S) 9-12<br />
DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 5/23-6/4/12<br />
NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />
STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 X STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />
ARTIST: SCOTT RIMM-HEWITT<br />
CONTRACT #: A8067<br />
TITLE OF PROGRAM: TUBA & BASS PLAYER FOR THE SHOW - BARNUM<br />
TYPE OF PROGRAM: ASSEMBLY<br />
DISTRICT/ SCHOOL: NORTH SALEM/NORTH SALEM MS & HS<br />
# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />
# OF STUDENTS: 200 GRADE(S) 6-12<br />
DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 2/4-12/12<br />
NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />
STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />
1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />
1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />
1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />
2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />
3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />
4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />
5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />
6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />
7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />
NONE<br />
8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />
NONE<br />
9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />
NONE<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
1.<br />
2.<br />
3.<br />
4.<br />
5.<br />
6.<br />
STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />
ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />
EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />
ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />
TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />
QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />
MR. RIMM IS AN INCREDIBLE MUSICIAN AND A GREAT ROLE MODEL<br />
FOR THE STUDENTS.<br />
8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />
NONE<br />
9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />
NONE<br />
Arts in Education Service - School Evaluations <strong>2011</strong>-<strong>2012</strong><br />
Page 281 of 332
ARTIST: SEBASTIAN ADAMO<br />
CONTRACT #: A7685<br />
TITLE OF PROGRAM: LIGHTING DESIGNER FOR THE FALL SHOW<br />
TYPE OF PROGRAM: RESIDENCY<br />
DISTRICT/ SCHOOL: KATONAH/LEWISBORO/JOHN JAY HIGH SCHOOL<br />
# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />
# OF STUDENTS: 400 GRADE(S) 9-12<br />
DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 10/28-11/24/11<br />
NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />
STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 X STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />
1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />
ARTIST: SERGEY NAZAROV<br />
CONTRACT #: A8561<br />
TITLE OF PROGRAM: VIOLIN PLAYER FOR THE SHOW - BEAUTY AND THE<br />
BEAST<br />
TYPE OF PROGRAM: ASSEMBLY<br />
DISTRICT/ SCHOOL: PLEASANTVILLE/PLEASANTVILLE HIGH SCHOOL<br />
# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />
# OF STUDENTS: 400 GRADE(S) 9-12<br />
DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 3/9-17/12<br />
NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />
STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 STANDARD 3 STANDARD 4<br />
1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />
1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />
2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />
3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />
4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />
5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />
6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />
7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />
NONE<br />
8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />
NONE<br />
9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />
NONE<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />
2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />
3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />
4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />
5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />
6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />
7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />
THIS HELPED OUR MUSICAL THEATRE PROGRAM.<br />
8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />
ALWAYS NICE WHEN ARTIST CAN PLAY ALL PERFORMANCES.<br />
9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />
NONE<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
N/<br />
ARTIST: SHAKESPEARE THEATRE OF NJ - NJ SH<br />
CONTRACT #: A7582<br />
TITLE OF PROGRAM: A MIDSUMMER NIGHT'S DREAM<br />
TYPE OF PROGRAM: ASSEMBLY<br />
DISTRICT/ SCHOOL: BYRAM HILLS/H.C. CRITTENDEN MIDDLE SCHOOL<br />
# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />
# OF STUDENTS: 200 GRADE(S) 8<br />
DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 5/29/12<br />
NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />
STANDARD 1 STANDARD 2 STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4 X<br />
ARTIST: SHANE O'REILLY<br />
CONTRACT #: A8569A<br />
TITLE OF PROGRAM: LEARNING THE GUITAR<br />
TYPE OF PROGRAM: WORKSHOP<br />
DISTRICT/ SCHOOL: KATONAH/LEWISBORO/MEADOWPOND ELEM.<br />
# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />
# OF STUDENTS: 9 GRADE(S) K-2<br />
DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 4/9-6/4/12<br />
NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />
STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 X STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />
1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />
1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />
1.<br />
2.<br />
3.<br />
4.<br />
5.<br />
6.<br />
STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />
ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />
EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />
ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />
TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />
QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
N/<br />
7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />
CAST IS YOUNG. PRODUCTION IS COOL AND CHILDREN RELATED<br />
WELL TO BOTH.<br />
8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />
NONE<br />
9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />
DIRECTLY CORRESPONDS TO CURRICULUM. CHILDREN ENGAGED<br />
AND REALLY ENJOYED IT.<br />
1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />
2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />
3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />
4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />
5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />
6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />
7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />
THE STUDENTS LOVE THIS PROGRAM.<br />
8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />
NONE<br />
9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />
NONE<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
Arts in Education Service - School Evaluations <strong>2011</strong>-<strong>2012</strong><br />
Page 282 of 332
ARTIST: SHANE O'REILLY<br />
CONTRACT #: A8569B<br />
TITLE OF PROGRAM: LEARNING THE GUITAR<br />
TYPE OF PROGRAM: WORKSHOP<br />
DISTRICT/ SCHOOL: KATONAH/LEWISBORO/MEADOWPOND ELEM.<br />
# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />
# OF STUDENTS: 6 GRADE(S) 3-5<br />
DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 4/11-5/30/12<br />
NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />
STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 X STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />
ARTIST: SHANE O'REILLY<br />
CONTRACT #: A8295<br />
TITLE OF PROGRAM: LEARNING THE GUITAR<br />
TYPE OF PROGRAM: WORKSHOP<br />
DISTRICT/ SCHOOL: KATONAH/LEWISBORO/MEADOWPOND ELEM.<br />
# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />
# OF STUDENTS: 70 GRADE(S) 3-5<br />
DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 1/9-3/26/12<br />
NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />
STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 X STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />
1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />
1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />
1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />
2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />
3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />
4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />
5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />
6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />
7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />
THE STUDENTS LOVED HIM AND HIS LESSONS.<br />
8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />
NONE<br />
9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />
NONE<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
1.<br />
2.<br />
3.<br />
4.<br />
5.<br />
6.<br />
STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />
ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />
EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />
ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />
TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />
QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />
SHANE IS VERY RESPONSIBLE EASY TO WORK WITH AND GREAT<br />
WITH THE STUDENTS. EVERYONE SIGNED UP FOR A SECOND<br />
SESSION AND MOST EVEN A THIRD.<br />
8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />
NONE<br />
9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />
NONE<br />
ARTIST: SHARI CARANANTE<br />
CONTRACT #: A8629<br />
TITLE OF PROGRAM: ARTS & CRAFTS / MAGICALLY MOSAIC<br />
TYPE OF PROGRAM: WORKSHOP<br />
DISTRICT/ SCHOOL: EASTCHESTER/WAVERLY EARLY CHILDHOOD CTR<br />
# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />
# OF STUDENTS: 9 GRADE(S) 1<br />
DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 3/14-5/9/12<br />
NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />
STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 X STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />
1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />
ARTIST: SHARI CARANANTE<br />
CONTRACT #: A7748<br />
TITLE OF PROGRAM: BIZZI BEES EXPLORING ME - CREATING A<br />
STORYBOOK<br />
TYPE OF PROGRAM: WORKSHOP<br />
DISTRICT/ SCHOOL: EASTCHESTER/WAVERLY EARLY CHILDHOOD CTR<br />
# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />
# OF STUDENTS: 8 GRADE(S) 1<br />
DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 10/14-12/16/11<br />
NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />
STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 X STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />
1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />
1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />
2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />
3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />
4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />
5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />
6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />
7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />
NONE<br />
8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />
NONE<br />
9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />
NONE<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
1.<br />
2.<br />
3.<br />
4.<br />
5.<br />
6.<br />
STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />
ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />
EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />
ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />
TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />
QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />
SHARI WAS HANDS ON AND LOVED WHAT SHE DID. SHE MADE THE<br />
CLASS FUN AND INTERESTING.<br />
8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />
NONE<br />
9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />
WE WOULD HAVE SHARI COME BACK AGAIN.<br />
Arts in Education Service - School Evaluations <strong>2011</strong>-<strong>2012</strong><br />
Page 283 of 332
ARTIST: SHARI CARANANTE<br />
CONTRACT #: A7660<br />
TITLE OF PROGRAM: FASHION DESIGNS<br />
TYPE OF PROGRAM: WORKSHOP<br />
DISTRICT/ SCHOOL: EASTCHESTER/GREENVALE ELEM.<br />
# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />
# OF STUDENTS: 13 GRADE(S) 2 & 3<br />
DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 10/19-12/14/11<br />
NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />
STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 X STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />
ARTIST: SHARI CARANANTE<br />
CONTRACT #: A8603<br />
TITLE OF PROGRAM: MOSAIC CREATIONS<br />
TYPE OF PROGRAM: WORKSHOP<br />
DISTRICT/ SCHOOL: EASTCHESTER/GREENVALE ELEM.<br />
# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />
# OF STUDENTS: 9 GRADE(S) 3-5<br />
DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 3/8-5/10/12<br />
NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />
STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 X STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />
1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />
1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />
1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />
2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />
3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />
4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />
5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />
6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
N/<br />
1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />
2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />
3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />
4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />
5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />
6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM?<br />
GREAT PROGRAM.<br />
Y<br />
WHY?<br />
7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM?<br />
NONE<br />
Y<br />
WHY?<br />
8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />
NONE<br />
9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />
NONE<br />
8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />
NONE<br />
9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />
NONE<br />
ARTIST: SHARON DICKER<br />
CONTRACT #: A7920<br />
TITLE OF PROGRAM: CREATIVE LITERACY - STORYTELLING<br />
TYPE OF PROGRAM: WORKSHOP<br />
DISTRICT/ SCHOOL: MT.VERNON/LONGFELLOW SCHOOL<br />
# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />
# OF STUDENTS: GRADE(S) PRE K<br />
DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE NOVEMBER, <strong>2012</strong><br />
NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />
STANDARD 1 STANDARD 2 STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />
1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />
ARTIST: SHIH ENTERPRISES, INC.<br />
CONTRACT #: A7935<br />
TITLE OF PROGRAM: PATRICIA SHIH - BIG IDEAS ABOUT CHARACTER ED<br />
CONCERT<br />
TYPE OF PROGRAM: ASSEMBLY<br />
DISTRICT/ SCHOOL: LAKELAND/GEORGE WASHINGTON ELEM.<br />
# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />
# OF STUDENTS: GRADE(S) K-5<br />
DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 11/16/11<br />
NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />
STANDARD 1 STANDARD 2 STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />
1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />
1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />
2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />
3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />
4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />
5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />
6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />
7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />
NONE<br />
8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />
NONE<br />
9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />
NONE<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
1.<br />
2.<br />
3.<br />
4.<br />
5.<br />
6.<br />
STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />
ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />
EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />
ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />
TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />
QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />
5<br />
5<br />
4<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />
THE STUDENTS THOROUGHTLY ENJOYED THE MUSIC AND SONGS.<br />
THEY LEARNED ABOUT CHARACTER EDUCATION.<br />
8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />
NONE<br />
9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />
WE FEEL THE PROGRAM SUPPORTS PBIS AND OUR CHARACTER<br />
EDUCATION PROGRAM. EACH PERFORMANCE IS WELL THOUGHT<br />
OUT, PLANNED AND IMPLEMENTED FLAWLESSLY.<br />
Arts in Education Service - School Evaluations <strong>2011</strong>-<strong>2012</strong><br />
Page 284 of 332
ARTIST: SHIH ENTERPRISES, INC.<br />
CONTRACT #: A8094<br />
TITLE OF PROGRAM: PATRICIA SHIH - LET'S GO TO CHINA SHOW<br />
TYPE OF PROGRAM: WORKSHOP<br />
DISTRICT/ SCHOOL: LAKELAND/GEORGE WASHINGTON ELEM.<br />
# OF TEACHERS: 3<br />
# OF STUDENTS: 60 GRADE(S) 3<br />
DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 5/22/12<br />
NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />
STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 X STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4 X<br />
ARTIST: SIERRA ASPREA<br />
CONTRACT #: A8081<br />
TITLE OF PROGRAM: DIRECTOR OF THE SENIOR REVUE<br />
TYPE OF PROGRAM: RESIDENCY<br />
DISTRICT/ SCHOOL:<br />
# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />
ARDSLEY/ARDSLEY HIGH SCHOOL<br />
# OF STUDENTS: 60 GRADE(S) 12<br />
DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 12/1/11-1/21/12<br />
NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />
STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 X STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />
1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />
1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />
1.<br />
2.<br />
3.<br />
4.<br />
5.<br />
6.<br />
STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />
ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />
EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />
ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />
TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />
QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
4<br />
5<br />
5<br />
7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />
ARTIST PRESENTED VARIOUS ARTIFACTS THAT STUDENTS FOUND<br />
INTERESTING.<br />
8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />
ARTIST NEEDS TO INCLUDE SOME TIME FOR Q & A.<br />
9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />
NONE<br />
ARTIST: SIMONA RODANO dba ITALIANA<br />
TITLE OF PROGRAM: ITALIAN MUSICAL THEATRE<br />
TYPE OF PROGRAM: ASSEMBLY<br />
DISTRICT/ SCHOOL:<br />
TUCKAHOE/W. E. COTTLE ELEM.<br />
CONTRACT #: A8366<br />
# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />
# OF STUDENTS: GRADE(S) K-5<br />
DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE<br />
1/27/12<br />
NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />
STANDARD 1 STANDARD 2 STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4 X<br />
1.<br />
2.<br />
3.<br />
4.<br />
5.<br />
6.<br />
STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />
ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />
EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />
ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />
TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />
QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />
SIERRA HAS A CLEAR SENSE OF HOW THIS PRODUCTION WORKS<br />
WITHIN THE CULTURE OF OUR SCHOOL.<br />
8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />
NONE<br />
9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />
ARTIST:<br />
THE RESPECT THE STUDENTS GIVE HER AND THE QUALITY OF THE<br />
SHOW IS A TESTAMENT TO THE VALUE OF SIERRA.<br />
SINGERS OF UNITED LANDS<br />
TITLE OF PROGRAM: MUSICAL RESIDENCY<br />
TYPE OF PROGRAM: WORKSHOP<br />
DISTRICT/ SCHOOL:<br />
CONTRACT #: A7870<br />
KATONAH/LEWISBORO/KATONAH ELEM. SCHOOL<br />
# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />
# OF STUDENTS: 490 GRADE(S) K-5<br />
DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 4/30-5/2/12<br />
NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />
STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4 X<br />
1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />
1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />
1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />
2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />
3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />
4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />
5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />
6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />
7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />
ESPECIALLY FOR THE YOUNGER GRADES.<br />
8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />
NONE<br />
9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />
NONE<br />
4<br />
4<br />
3<br />
4<br />
4<br />
4<br />
1.<br />
2.<br />
3.<br />
4.<br />
5.<br />
6.<br />
STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />
ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />
EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />
ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />
TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />
QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
N/<br />
7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />
WE HAVE HAD S.O.U.L. SEVERAL YEARS AND THE STUDENTS LOVE<br />
THE PROGRAM. THE STUDENTS CAN BE HEARD SINGING THE<br />
SONGS ON THE PLAYGROUND AND THEY HAVE A DEEPER<br />
UNDERSTANDING OUR OTHER CULTURES AROUND THE WORLD.<br />
8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />
NONE<br />
9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />
NONE<br />
Arts in Education Service - School Evaluations <strong>2011</strong>-<strong>2012</strong><br />
Page 285 of 332
ARTIST: SINGERS OF UNITED LANDS<br />
CONTRACT #: A8810<br />
TITLE OF PROGRAM: MUSICAL RESIDENCY<br />
TYPE OF PROGRAM: WORKSHOP<br />
DISTRICT/ SCHOOL: KATONAH/LEWISBORO/INCREASE MILLER ELEM.<br />
# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />
# OF STUDENTS: GRADE(S) K-5<br />
DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 5/3 & 4/12<br />
NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />
STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4 X<br />
ARTIST: SLIM GOODBODY ASSEMBLY PROGRAM CONTRACT #: A7529<br />
TITLE OF PROGRAM: MUSICAL HEALTH SHOW<br />
TYPE OF PROGRAM: ASSEMBLY<br />
DISTRICT/ SCHOOL:<br />
# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />
LAKELAND/VAN CORT ELEM.<br />
# OF STUDENTS: 650 GRADE(S) K-5<br />
DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 6/6/12<br />
NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />
STANDARD 1 STANDARD 2 STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />
1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />
1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />
1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />
2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />
3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />
4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />
5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />
6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />
2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />
3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />
4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />
5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />
6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />
THE SINGERS WERE AMAZING. THEY WERE FRIENDLY AND<br />
EXTREMELY INFORMATIVE. THEY KNOW HOW TO KEEP THE<br />
STUDENTS ENGAGED.<br />
8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />
NONE<br />
9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />
THANK YOU. THIS WAS A WONDERFUL PROGRAM.<br />
7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />
HE WAS GREAT AND VERY ENGAGING TO CHILDREN AT ALL<br />
LEVELS.<br />
8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />
NONE<br />
9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />
IT WAS VERY ENGAGING, FUN, AND RELATED TO THE CHILDREN<br />
VERY WELL.<br />
ARTIST: SOFIA ZIELYK<br />
CONTRACT #: A7948<br />
TITLE OF PROGRAM: ART OF PYSANKY EASTER EGGS - UKRANIUM EGGS<br />
TYPE OF PROGRAM: WORKSHOP<br />
DISTRICT/ SCHOOL:<br />
# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />
HASTINGS/HILLSIDE ELEM.<br />
# OF STUDENTS: 123 GRADE(S) 3<br />
DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 3/22/12<br />
NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />
STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 X STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4 X<br />
ARTIST: SOPHIA MORTON<br />
CONTRACT #: A7745<br />
TITLE OF PROGRAM: COSTUMING & MAKE-UP FOR THE FALL SHOW<br />
TYPE OF PROGRAM: RESIDENCY<br />
DISTRICT/ SCHOOL: KATONAH/LEWISBORO/JOHN JAY HIGH SCHOOL<br />
# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />
# OF STUDENTS: 20 GRADE(S) 9-12<br />
DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 11/1-20/11<br />
NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />
STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 X STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />
1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />
1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />
1.<br />
2.<br />
3.<br />
4.<br />
5.<br />
6.<br />
STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />
ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />
EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />
ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />
TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />
QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />
SHE WAS KNOWLEDGEABLE AND UNDERSTOOD HOW TO TALK TO<br />
CHILDREN AND KEEP THEIR INTEREST.<br />
8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />
NONE<br />
9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />
WE HOPE TO HAVE HER RETURN.<br />
1.<br />
2.<br />
3.<br />
4.<br />
5.<br />
6.<br />
STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />
ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />
EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />
ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />
TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />
QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />
SOPHIA IS A TERRIFIC ARTIST. SHE REALLY KNOWS DESIGN AND<br />
HOW TO COMMUNICATE ITS PRINCIPLES TO STUDENTS.<br />
8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />
NONE<br />
9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />
I DON'T THINK THIS ARTIST IS AVAILABLE FOR MUCH FUTURE<br />
WORK - HER NON-EDUCATIONAL WORK IS REALLY TAKING OFF.<br />
Arts in Education Service - School Evaluations <strong>2011</strong>-<strong>2012</strong><br />
Page 286 of 332
ARTIST: SOREN BENNICK PROD., INC.<br />
CONTRACT #: A7872<br />
TITLE OF PROGRAM: POWER OF ONE - ANTI-BULLYING SHOW<br />
TYPE OF PROGRAM: ASSEMBLY<br />
DISTRICT/ SCHOOL:<br />
# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />
BYRAM HILLS/COMAN HILL ELEM.<br />
# OF STUDENTS: 600 GRADE(S) K-2<br />
DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 11/8/11<br />
NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />
STANDARD 1 STANDARD 2 STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />
1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />
ARTIST: SOUND APPLICATIONS, LTD<br />
CONTRACT #: A7707<br />
TITLE OF PROGRAM: ED JOHNSON - SOUND DESIGNER FOR THE SHOW -<br />
ANNIE GET YOUR GUN<br />
TYPE OF PROGRAM: RESIDENCY<br />
DISTRICT/ SCHOOL: LAKELAND/WALTER PANAS HIGH SCHOOL<br />
# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />
# OF STUDENTS: 100 GRADE(S) 9-12<br />
DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 11/14-19/11<br />
NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />
STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 X STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />
1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />
1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />
2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />
3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />
4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />
5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />
6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />
7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />
THEY DO A GREAT JOB OF INTERDUCING YOUNG CHILDREN TO<br />
TERMS LIKE BULLYING, VICTIM, BYSTANDER AND UPSTANDING.<br />
8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />
MOLLY WAS RUDE TO STAFF. PERHAPS CHOOSE ANOTHER<br />
ACTRESS.<br />
9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />
NONE<br />
3<br />
4<br />
3<br />
3<br />
3<br />
3<br />
1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />
2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />
3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />
4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />
5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />
6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />
7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />
NONE<br />
8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />
NONE<br />
9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />
NONE<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
ARTIST: SOUND APPLICATIONS, LTD<br />
CONTRACT #: A8328<br />
TITLE OF PROGRAM: ED JOHNSON - SOUND DESIGNER FOR THE SPRING<br />
MUSICAL - MY FAIR LADY<br />
TYPE OF PROGRAM: RESIDENCY<br />
DISTRICT/ SCHOOL: LAKELAND/WALTER PANAS HIGH SCHOOL<br />
# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />
# OF STUDENTS: 200 GRADE(S) 9-12<br />
DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 4/30-5/512<br />
NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />
STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 X STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />
1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />
ARTIST: SPANISH DANCE ART COMPANY, INC. CONTRACT #: A8539<br />
TITLE OF PROGRAM: FIESTA FLAMENCA LECTURE & DEMONSTRATION<br />
TYPE OF PROGRAM: ASSEMBLY<br />
DISTRICT/ SCHOOL:<br />
# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />
PELHAM/HUTCHINSON ELEM.<br />
# OF STUDENTS: 360 GRADE(S) K-5<br />
DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 2/26/12<br />
NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />
STANDARD 1 STANDARD 2 STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4 X<br />
1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />
1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />
2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />
3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />
4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />
5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />
6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />
7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />
NONE<br />
8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />
NONE<br />
9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />
NONE<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
1.<br />
2.<br />
3.<br />
4.<br />
5.<br />
6.<br />
STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />
ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />
EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />
ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />
TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />
QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />
5<br />
5<br />
4<br />
5<br />
4<br />
4<br />
7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />
THE PERFORMERS WERE HIGHLY SKILLED, VERY ENGAGING AND<br />
BROUGHT TO LIFE A BEAUTIFUL ART FORM WHICH MOST<br />
STUDENTS WERE PROBABLY UNFAMILIAR.<br />
8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />
NONE<br />
9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />
NONE<br />
Arts in Education Service - School Evaluations <strong>2011</strong>-<strong>2012</strong><br />
Page 287 of 332
ARTIST: SPECIAL PROGRAMS & RESOURCE CO<br />
CONTRACT #: A8469<br />
TITLE OF PROGRAM: ANNE ZIMMERMAN - KIDS EXPRESS<br />
TYPE OF PROGRAM: WORKSHOP<br />
DISTRICT/ SCHOOL:<br />
# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />
LAKELAND/VAN CORT ELEM.<br />
# OF STUDENTS: 8 GRADE(S) 1 & 2<br />
DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 2/8-5/9/12<br />
NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />
STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 X STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />
ARTIST: SPECIAL PROGRAMS & RESOURCE CO CONTRACT #: A7822<br />
TITLE OF PROGRAM: ANNE ZIMMERMAN - KIDS EXPRESS<br />
TYPE OF PROGRAM: WORKSHOP<br />
DISTRICT/ SCHOOL:<br />
# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />
LAKELAND/VAN CORT ELEM.<br />
# OF STUDENTS: 7 GRADE(S) 1 & 2<br />
DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 10/12/11-1/4/12<br />
NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />
STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 X STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />
1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />
1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />
1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />
2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />
3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />
4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />
5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />
6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />
2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />
3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />
4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />
5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />
6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />
4<br />
4<br />
4<br />
4<br />
4<br />
4<br />
7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM?<br />
NONE<br />
Y<br />
WHY?<br />
7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM?<br />
NONE<br />
Y<br />
WHY?<br />
8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />
NONE<br />
9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />
NONE<br />
8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />
NONE<br />
9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />
NONE<br />
ARTIST: SPECIAL PROGRAMS & RESOURCE CO CONTRACT #: A7823B<br />
TITLE OF PROGRAM: ANNE ZIMMERMAN - KIDS EXPRESS<br />
TYPE OF PROGRAM: WORKSHOP<br />
DISTRICT/ SCHOOL: LAKELAND/THOMAS JEFFERSON ELEM.<br />
# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />
# OF STUDENTS: 7 GRADE(S) 1 & 2<br />
DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 10/14/11-2/3/12<br />
NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />
STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 X STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />
ARTIST: SPECIAL PROGRAMS & RESOURCE CO CONTRACT #: A8470B<br />
TITLE OF PROGRAM: ANNE ZIMMERMAN - KIDS EXPRESS<br />
TYPE OF PROGRAM: WORKSHOP<br />
DISTRICT/ SCHOOL: LAKELAND/THOMAS JEFFERSON ELEM.<br />
# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />
# OF STUDENTS: 8 GRADE(S) 3<br />
DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 2/10-6/8/12<br />
NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />
STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 X STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />
1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />
1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />
1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />
2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />
3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />
4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />
5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />
6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />
4<br />
4<br />
4<br />
4<br />
4<br />
4<br />
1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />
2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />
3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />
4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />
5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />
6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM?<br />
NONE<br />
Y<br />
WHY?<br />
7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM?<br />
NONE<br />
Y<br />
WHY?<br />
8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />
NONE<br />
9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />
NONE<br />
8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />
NONE<br />
9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />
NONE<br />
Arts in Education Service - School Evaluations <strong>2011</strong>-<strong>2012</strong><br />
Page 288 of 332
ARTIST: SPECIAL PROGRAMS & RESOURCE CO<br />
CONTRACT #: A8467B<br />
TITLE OF PROGRAM: ANNE ZIMMERMAN - KIDS EXPRESS<br />
TYPE OF PROGRAM: WORKSHOP<br />
DISTRICT/ SCHOOL:<br />
# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />
LAKELAND/LINCOLN-TITUS ELEM.<br />
# OF STUDENTS: 7 GRADE(S) 1-3<br />
DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 2/7-5/8/12<br />
NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />
STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 X STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />
ARTIST: SPECIAL PROGRAMS & RESOURCE CO CONTRACT #: A8466C<br />
TITLE OF PROGRAM: CARRIE LICHTIG - KIDS EXPRESS<br />
TYPE OF PROGRAM: WORKSHOP<br />
DISTRICT/ SCHOOL: LAKELAND/GEORGE WASHINGTON ELEM.<br />
# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />
# OF STUDENTS: 8 GRADE(S) 2 & 3<br />
DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 2/6-5/21/12<br />
NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />
STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 X STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />
1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />
1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />
1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />
2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />
3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />
4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />
5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />
6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />
2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />
3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />
4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />
5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />
6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM?<br />
NONE<br />
Y<br />
WHY?<br />
7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM?<br />
NONE<br />
Y<br />
WHY?<br />
8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />
NONE<br />
9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />
NONE<br />
8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />
NONE<br />
9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />
NONE<br />
ARTIST: SPECIAL PROGRAMS & RESOURCE CO CONTRACT #: A7821A<br />
TITLE OF PROGRAM: CARRIE LICHTIG - KIDS EXPRESS<br />
TYPE OF PROGRAM: WORKSHOP<br />
DISTRICT/ SCHOOL: LAKELAND/GEORGE WASHINGTON ELEM.<br />
# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />
# OF STUDENTS: 9 GRADE(S) 2 & 3<br />
DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 10/17/11-1/23/12<br />
NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />
STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 X STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />
ARTIST: SPECIAL PROGRAMS & RESOURCE CO CONTRACT #: A8470A<br />
TITLE OF PROGRAM: JENNIFER AVITABILE - KIDS EXPRESS<br />
TYPE OF PROGRAM: WORKSHOP<br />
DISTRICT/ SCHOOL: LAKELAND/THOMAS JEFFERSON ELEM.<br />
# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />
# OF STUDENTS: 7 GRADE(S) 1 & 2<br />
DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 2/10-6/8/12<br />
NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />
STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 X STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />
1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />
1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />
1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />
2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />
3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />
4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />
5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />
6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />
4<br />
4<br />
4<br />
4<br />
4<br />
4<br />
1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />
2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />
3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />
4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />
5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />
6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />
4<br />
4<br />
4<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM?<br />
NONE<br />
Y<br />
WHY?<br />
7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM?<br />
NONE<br />
Y<br />
WHY?<br />
8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />
NONE<br />
9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />
NONE<br />
8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />
NONE<br />
9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />
NONE<br />
Arts in Education Service - School Evaluations <strong>2011</strong>-<strong>2012</strong><br />
Page 289 of 332
ARTIST: SPECIAL PROGRAMS & RESOURCE CO<br />
CONTRACT #: A7823A<br />
TITLE OF PROGRAM: JENNIFER AVITABILE - KIDS EXPRESS<br />
TYPE OF PROGRAM: WORKSHOP<br />
DISTRICT/ SCHOOL: LAKELAND/THOMAS JEFFERSON ELEM.<br />
# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />
# OF STUDENTS: 9 GRADE(S) 3<br />
DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 10/14/11-2/3/12<br />
NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />
STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 X STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />
ARTIST: SPECIAL PROGRAMS & RESOURCE CO CONTRACT #: A8466A<br />
TITLE OF PROGRAM: KATRINA KLEIN - KIDS EXPRESS<br />
TYPE OF PROGRAM: WORKSHOP<br />
DISTRICT/ SCHOOL: LAKELAND/GEORGE WASHINGTON ELEM.<br />
# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />
# OF STUDENTS: 7 GRADE(S) K<br />
DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 2/6-5/21/12<br />
NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />
STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 X STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />
1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />
1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />
1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />
2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />
3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />
4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />
5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />
6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />
4<br />
4<br />
4<br />
4<br />
4<br />
4<br />
1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />
2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />
3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />
4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />
5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />
6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM?<br />
NONE<br />
Y<br />
WHY?<br />
7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM?<br />
NONE<br />
Y<br />
WHY?<br />
8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />
NONE<br />
9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />
NONE<br />
8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />
NONE<br />
9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />
NONE<br />
ARTIST: SPECIAL PROGRAMS & RESOURCE CO CONTRACT #: A7821B<br />
TITLE OF PROGRAM: RACHEL ARRIETA - KIDS EXPRESS<br />
TYPE OF PROGRAM: WORKSHOP<br />
DISTRICT/ SCHOOL: LAKELAND/GEORGE WASHINGTON ELEM.<br />
# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />
# OF STUDENTS: 8 GRADE(S) K & 1<br />
DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 10/17/11-1/23/12<br />
NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />
STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 X STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />
ARTIST: SPECIAL PROGRAMS & RESOURCE CO CONTRACT #: A8467A<br />
TITLE OF PROGRAM: RANDALL STUART - MAGIC MUSIC<br />
TYPE OF PROGRAM: WORKSHOP<br />
DISTRICT/ SCHOOL:<br />
# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />
LAKELAND/LINCOLN-TITUS ELEM.<br />
# OF STUDENTS: 8 GRADE(S) 1-4<br />
DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 2/6-5/21/12<br />
NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />
STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 X STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />
1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />
1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />
1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />
2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />
3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />
4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />
5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />
6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />
4<br />
4<br />
4<br />
4<br />
4<br />
4<br />
1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />
2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />
3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />
4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />
5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />
6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM?<br />
NONE<br />
Y<br />
WHY?<br />
7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM?<br />
NONE<br />
Y<br />
WHY?<br />
8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />
NONE<br />
9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />
NONE<br />
8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />
NONE<br />
9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />
NONE<br />
Arts in Education Service - School Evaluations <strong>2011</strong>-<strong>2012</strong><br />
Page 290 of 332
ARTIST: SPECIAL PROGRAMS & RESOURCE CO<br />
CONTRACT #: A8466B<br />
TITLE OF PROGRAM: REBECCA ROTHE - KIDS EXPRESS<br />
TYPE OF PROGRAM: WORKSHOP<br />
DISTRICT/ SCHOOL: LAKELAND/GEORGE WASHINGTON ELEM.<br />
# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />
# OF STUDENTS: 9 GRADE(S) 1<br />
DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 2/6-5/21/12<br />
NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />
STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 X STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />
ARTIST: SPECIAL PROGRAMS & RESOURCE CO CONTRACT #: A8468<br />
TITLE OF PROGRAM: REBECCA ROTHE - KIDS EXPRESS<br />
TYPE OF PROGRAM: WORKSHOP<br />
DISTRICT/ SCHOOL: LAKELAND/BENJAMIN FRANKLIN ELEM.<br />
# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />
# OF STUDENTS: 9 GRADE(S) 1-3<br />
DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 2/7-5/8/12<br />
NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />
STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 X STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />
1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />
1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />
1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />
2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />
3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />
4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />
5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />
6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />
2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />
3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />
4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />
5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />
6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM?<br />
NONE<br />
Y<br />
WHY?<br />
7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM?<br />
NONE<br />
Y<br />
WHY?<br />
8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />
NONE<br />
9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />
NONE<br />
8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />
NONE<br />
9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />
NONE<br />
ARTIST: SQUEAKY CLEAN MUSIC CORP. dba SQ CONTRACT #: A8719<br />
TITLE OF PROGRAM: RAVE ON THE ROOTS OF ROCK & ROLL - GROWING<br />
UP IN THE 60'S<br />
TYPE OF PROGRAM: ASSEMBLY<br />
DISTRICT/ SCHOOL: TUCKAHOE/W. E. COTTLE ELEM. & MIDDLE SCHOOL<br />
# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />
# OF STUDENTS: 260 GRADE(S) K-8<br />
DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 5/14/12<br />
NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />
STANDARD 1 STANDARD 2 STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4 X<br />
1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />
ARTIST: STACY MONTEIRO<br />
CONTRACT #: A7857<br />
TITLE OF PROGRAM: HIP HOP DANCING<br />
TYPE OF PROGRAM: RESIDENCY<br />
DISTRICT/ SCHOOL: EASTCHESTER/EASTCHESTER HIGH SCHOOL<br />
# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />
# OF STUDENTS: 15 GRADE(S) 9-12<br />
DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 10/30/11-1/23/12<br />
NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />
STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 X STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />
1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />
1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />
2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />
3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />
4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />
5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />
6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />
7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />
THE PERFORMANCES WERE OUTSTANDING.<br />
8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />
NONE<br />
9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />
NONE<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
1.<br />
2.<br />
3.<br />
4.<br />
5.<br />
6.<br />
STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />
ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />
EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />
ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />
TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />
QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />
SHE WAS WONDERFUL IN EVERY ASPECT AND THE DANCERS LOVE<br />
BEING IN HER PIECE.<br />
8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />
NONE<br />
9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />
NONE<br />
Arts in Education Service - School Evaluations <strong>2011</strong>-<strong>2012</strong><br />
Page 291 of 332
ARTIST: STAMPFLI ENTERPRISES, LLC dba SCAR CONTRACT #: A8617A<br />
TITLE OF PROGRAM: KATIE WOOLDRIDGE - VIOLIN<br />
TYPE OF PROGRAM: WORKSHOP<br />
DISTRICT/ SCHOOL:<br />
EASTCHESTER/ANNE HUTCHINSON ELEM.<br />
# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />
# OF STUDENTS: GRADE(S) 2-5<br />
DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE<br />
3/5-5/14/12<br />
NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />
STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 X STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />
1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />
1.<br />
2.<br />
3.<br />
4.<br />
5.<br />
6.<br />
STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />
ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />
EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />
ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />
TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />
QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />
4<br />
4<br />
4<br />
4<br />
4<br />
4<br />
7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />
EXCELLENT DELIVERY OF MUSIC INSTRUCTION. VERY ENGAGING.<br />
8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />
NONE<br />
9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />
NONE<br />
ARTIST: STAMPFLI ENTERPRISES, LLC dba SCAR CONTRACT #: A8617B<br />
TITLE OF PROGRAM: ZACH COHEN - GUITAR<br />
TYPE OF PROGRAM: WORKSHOP<br />
DISTRICT/ SCHOOL:<br />
EASTCHESTER/ANNE HUTCHINSON ELEM.<br />
# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />
# OF STUDENTS: GRADE(S) 2-5<br />
DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE<br />
3/5-5/14/12<br />
NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />
STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 X STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />
ARTIST:<br />
STAMPFLI ENTERPRISES, LLC dba SCAR CONTRACT #: A7728<br />
TITLE OF PROGRAM: LYNWOOD JIANG - SOMETIMES YOU JUST HAVE TO<br />
FIDDLE AROUND<br />
TYPE OF PROGRAM: WORKSHOP<br />
DISTRICT/ SCHOOL:<br />
EASTCHESTER/ANNE HUTCHINSON ELEM.<br />
# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />
# OF STUDENTS: GRADE(S) 2-5<br />
DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE<br />
10/4-12/20/11<br />
NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />
STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 X STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />
1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />
1.<br />
2.<br />
3.<br />
4.<br />
5.<br />
6.<br />
STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />
ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />
EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />
ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />
TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />
QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />
4<br />
4<br />
4<br />
4<br />
4<br />
4<br />
7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />
THIS INSTRUCTOR WAS VERY ORGANIZED. PRESENTATIONS WERE<br />
EXCELLENT AND STUDENTS LOVED THE PROGRAM.<br />
8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />
NONE<br />
9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />
NONE<br />
ARTIST: STANLEY FRIEDMANN dba FRIEDMANN CONTRACT #: A8071<br />
TITLE OF PROGRAM: AUTHOR VISIT<br />
TYPE OF PROGRAM: ASSEMBLY<br />
DISTRICT/ SCHOOL: NEW ROCHELLE/WARD ELEM. SCHOOL<br />
# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />
# OF STUDENTS: 177 GRADE(S) 5<br />
DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 5/4/12<br />
NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />
STANDARD 1 STANDARD 2 STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />
1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />
1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />
1.<br />
2.<br />
3.<br />
4.<br />
5.<br />
6.<br />
STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />
ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />
EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />
ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />
TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />
QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />
4<br />
4<br />
4<br />
4<br />
4<br />
4<br />
7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />
EXCELLENT DELIVERY OF MUSIC INSTRUCTION. VERY ENGAGING.<br />
8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />
NONE<br />
9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />
NONE<br />
1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />
2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />
3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />
4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />
5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />
6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />
7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? ? WHY?<br />
HE WAS ENGAGING. I AM NOT SURE THE CHILDREN CONNECTED<br />
WITH HIS MESSAGE THOUGH.<br />
8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />
THERE WASN'T MUCH FOR THE CHILDREN TO HOOK ONTO THAT<br />
COULD HELP THEM START WRITING.<br />
9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />
WHILE HE WAS ENGAGING AND THE CHILDREN ENJOYED<br />
LISTENING TO HIM, I AM NOT SO SURE HOW VALUABLE THE<br />
PROGRAM WAS.<br />
4<br />
3<br />
2<br />
4<br />
4<br />
N/<br />
Arts in Education Service - School Evaluations <strong>2011</strong>-<strong>2012</strong><br />
Page 292 of 332
ARTIST: STEPHEN AUSTIN<br />
CONTRACT #: A8750<br />
TITLE OF PROGRAM: TRUMPET PLAYER FOR THE SHOW - A FUNNY THING<br />
HAPPENED ON THE WAY TO THE FORUM<br />
TYPE OF PROGRAM: ASSEMBLY<br />
DISTRICT/ SCHOOL: PUTNAM VALLEY/PUTNAM VALLEY HIGH SCHOOL<br />
# OF TEACHERS: 3<br />
# OF STUDENTS: 400 GRADE(S) 9-12<br />
DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 4/13-23/12<br />
NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />
STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />
1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />
ARTIST: STEPHEN AUSTIN<br />
CONTRACT #: A8064<br />
TITLE OF PROGRAM: TRUMPET PLAYER FOR THE SHOW - BARNUM<br />
TYPE OF PROGRAM: ASSEMBLY<br />
DISTRICT/ SCHOOL: NORTH SALEM/NORTH SALEM MIDDLE & HIGH SCHOO<br />
# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />
# OF STUDENTS: 200 GRADE(S) 6-12<br />
DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 2/4-12/12<br />
NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />
STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />
1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />
1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />
2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />
3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />
4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />
5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />
6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />
7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />
NONE<br />
8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />
NONE<br />
9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />
NONE<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
N/<br />
1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />
2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />
3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />
4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />
5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />
6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />
7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />
MR. AUSTIN IS INVALUABLE TO OUR PRODUCTION AS AN<br />
INSTRUMENTALIST, AN ORCHESTRATOR AND A CONTRACTOR.<br />
8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />
NONE<br />
9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />
NONE<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
ARTIST: STEPHEN COOK<br />
CONTRACT #: A7802<br />
TITLE OF PROGRAM: DIRECTOR FOR THE FALL DRAM<br />
TYPE OF PROGRAM: RESIDENCY<br />
DISTRICT/ SCHOOL: CROTON/PIERRE VAN CORT MIDDLE SCHOOL<br />
# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />
# OF STUDENTS: 35 GRADE(S) 5-8<br />
DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 10/11-11/19/11<br />
NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />
STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 X STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />
ARTIST: STEVE BURCHARD<br />
CONTRACT #: A8591<br />
TITLE OF PROGRAM: LEARNING TO PERFORM MAGIC<br />
TYPE OF PROGRAM: ASSEMBLY<br />
DISTRICT/ SCHOOL: EASTCHESTER/WAVERLY EARLY CHILDHOOD CTR<br />
# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />
# OF STUDENTS: GRADE(S) 1<br />
DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 3/9-5/7/12<br />
NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />
STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 X STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />
1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />
1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />
1.<br />
2.<br />
3.<br />
4.<br />
5.<br />
6.<br />
STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />
ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />
EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />
ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />
TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />
QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />
STEPHEN WAS VERY APPROPRIATE WITH STUDENTS AND HELPED<br />
THEM TO CREATE A WONDERFUL SHOW. THE STUDENTS WERE<br />
MOTIVATED AND ENTHUSIASTIC ABOUT THEIR ROLES.<br />
8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />
NONE<br />
9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />
NONE<br />
1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />
2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />
3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />
4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />
5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />
6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />
7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />
THE CHILDREN REALLY ENJOYED LEARNING TRICKS AND<br />
PARTICIPATING IN A MAGIC SHOW.<br />
8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />
NONE<br />
9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />
NONE<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
Arts in Education Service - School Evaluations <strong>2011</strong>-<strong>2012</strong><br />
Page 293 of 332
ARTIST: STEVE MAX, INC.<br />
CONTRACT #: A8139<br />
TITLE OF PROGRAM: SIMON SEZ FOR BETTER LISTENING<br />
TYPE OF PROGRAM: ASSEMBLY<br />
DISTRICT/ SCHOOL:<br />
# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />
CHAPPAQUA/GRAFFLIN ELEM.<br />
# OF STUDENTS: 115 GRADE(S) K-2<br />
DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 12/15/11<br />
NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />
STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />
ARTIST: STEVE MAX, INC.<br />
CONTRACT #: A8089<br />
TITLE OF PROGRAM: SIMON SEZ FOR BETTER LISTENING<br />
TYPE OF PROGRAM: ASSEMBLY<br />
DISTRICT/ SCHOOL: EASTCHESTER/WAVERLY EARLY CHILDHOOD CTR<br />
# OF TEACHERS: 15 # OF STUDENTS: 525 GRADE(S) K & 1<br />
DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 1/12/12<br />
NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />
STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />
1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />
1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />
1.<br />
2.<br />
3.<br />
4.<br />
5.<br />
6.<br />
STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />
ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />
EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />
ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />
TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />
QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />
4<br />
4<br />
4<br />
4<br />
5<br />
4<br />
7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />
THE SPEAKER WAS EXCELLENT AND THE CHILDREN HAD A GREAT<br />
TIME.<br />
8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />
GET THE CHILDREN MOVING A LITTLE MORE.<br />
9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />
ALL IN ALL, A GREAT PROGRAM THAT WAS ENGAGING.<br />
ARTIST: STEVEN KELLOGG<br />
TITLE OF PROGRAM: AUTHOR VISIT<br />
TYPE OF PROGRAM: ASSEMBLY<br />
DISTRICT/ SCHOOL:<br />
SOMERS/PRIMROSE ELEM.<br />
CONTRACT #: A8867<br />
# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />
# OF STUDENTS: 241 GRADE(S) 2<br />
DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE<br />
5/17/12<br />
NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />
STANDARD 1 STANDARD 2 STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />
1.<br />
2.<br />
3.<br />
4.<br />
5.<br />
6.<br />
STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />
ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />
EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />
ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />
TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />
QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />
STEVE IS ONE OF THE BEST PERFORMERS THAT COMES TO<br />
WAVERLY EACH YEAR. HE IS FUN, INTERACTIVE AND ENGAGING.<br />
HE KNOWS HOW TO GET HIS POINT ACROSS AND GET THE<br />
STUDENTS UNDIVIDED ATTENTION.<br />
8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />
NONE<br />
9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />
ARTIST:<br />
THE CHILDREN ARE ENTERTAINED WHILE THEY ARE LEARNING. HE<br />
TEACHES WONDERFUL CONCEPTS IN A VERY POSITIVE<br />
INTERESTING AND INTERACTIVE WAY.<br />
STEVEN KELLOGG<br />
TITLE OF PROGRAM: AUTHOR VISIT<br />
TYPE OF PROGRAM: ASSEMBLY<br />
DISTRICT/ SCHOOL:<br />
CHAPPAQUA/GRAFFLIN ELEM.<br />
CONTRACT #: A7976<br />
# OF TEACHERS: 3<br />
# OF STUDENTS: 80 GRADE(S) K-2<br />
DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 12/6/11<br />
NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />
STANDARD 1 STANDARD 2 ` STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />
1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />
1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />
1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />
2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />
3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />
4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />
5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />
6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />
2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />
3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />
4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />
5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />
6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
4<br />
5<br />
N/<br />
7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM?<br />
NONE<br />
8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />
NONE<br />
9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />
GREAT JOB. WE LOVE TO HOST STEVEN.<br />
Y<br />
WHY?<br />
7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />
HE WAS QUITE ENGAGING AND THE STUDENTS SEEM TO ENJOY<br />
THE PROGRAM.<br />
8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />
SHORTEN PROGRAM BY 10 MINUTES.<br />
9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />
WE LIKED HOW THE STUDENTS WERE ABLE TO TAKE HOME THE<br />
MINI POSTERS.<br />
Arts in Education Service - School Evaluations <strong>2011</strong>-<strong>2012</strong><br />
Page 294 of 332
ARTIST:<br />
STEVEN KELLOGG<br />
TITLE OF PROGRAM: AUTHOR VISIT<br />
TYPE OF PROGRAM: ASSEMBLY<br />
DISTRICT/ SCHOOL:<br />
CHAPPAQUA/GRAFFLIN ELEM.<br />
CONTRACT #: A7976<br />
# OF TEACHERS: 4<br />
# OF STUDENTS: 76 GRADE(S) K-2<br />
DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE<br />
12/6/11<br />
NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />
STANDARD 1 STANDARD 2 STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />
1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />
1.<br />
2.<br />
3.<br />
4.<br />
5.<br />
6.<br />
STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />
ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />
EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />
ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />
TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />
QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />
4<br />
5<br />
5<br />
4<br />
5<br />
N/<br />
7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />
THE PRESENTATION WAS HIGH ENERGY, INFORMATIVE AND WELL<br />
DONE.<br />
8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />
NONE<br />
9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />
ARTIST:<br />
IT WAS A REAL TREAT HAVING HIM VISIT.<br />
STRIKING VIKING STORY PIRATES, LLC<br />
TITLE OF PROGRAM: GREATEST HITS SHOW<br />
TYPE OF PROGRAM: ASSEMBLY<br />
DISTRICT/ SCHOOL:<br />
ARDSLEY/CONCORD ROAD ELEM.<br />
CONTRACT #: A8881<br />
# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />
# OF STUDENTS: GRADE(S) K-4<br />
DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE<br />
6/20/12<br />
NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />
STANDARD 1 STANDARD 2 STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />
1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />
1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />
2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />
3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />
4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />
5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />
6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />
7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />
THE SHOW HAD LOTS OF ENERGY AND CREATIVE FUN.<br />
8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />
IT WAS HARD TO HEAR SINCE THE AUDIENCE WAS SO BIG. I THINK<br />
HAVING 1/2 THE SCHOOL OR ONE GRADE WOULD BE BETTER.<br />
9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />
NONE<br />
4<br />
5<br />
4<br />
5<br />
3<br />
N/<br />
ARTIST: STEVEN MATURNO<br />
CONTRACT #: A8424<br />
TITLE OF PROGRAM: LIGHTING DESIGNER FOR THE SHOW - SIX DEGREES<br />
OF SEPARATION<br />
TYPE OF PROGRAM: RESIDENCY<br />
DISTRICT/ SCHOOL:<br />
CHAPPAQUA/HORACE GREELEY HIGH SCHOOL<br />
# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />
# OF STUDENTS: 22 GRADE(S) 9-12<br />
DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE<br />
2/17-3/12/12<br />
NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />
STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 X STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />
1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />
1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />
2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />
3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />
4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />
5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />
6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />
7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />
STEVE IS A GREAT DESIGNER AND WORKED REALLY WELL WITH<br />
THE STUDENTS<br />
8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />
.NONE<br />
9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />
ARTIST:<br />
I HOPE TO WORK WITH HIM IN THE FUTURE.<br />
SUSAN CUMMINGS<br />
CONTRACT #: A8441<br />
TITLE OF PROGRAM: CO PRODUCTION MANAGER FOR THE - SHOW A<br />
FUNNY THING HAPPENED ON THE WAY TO THE<br />
FORUM<br />
TYPE OF PROGRAM: RESIDENCY<br />
DISTRICT/ SCHOOL:<br />
PUTNAM VALLEY/PUTNAM VALLEY HIGH SCHOOL<br />
# OF TEACHERS: 3<br />
# OF STUDENTS: 400 GRADE(S) 9-12<br />
DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 3/3-4/23/12<br />
NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />
STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 X STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />
1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />
1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />
2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />
3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />
4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />
5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />
6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />
7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />
NONE<br />
8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />
NONE<br />
9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />
NONE<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
Arts in Education Service - School Evaluations <strong>2011</strong>-<strong>2012</strong><br />
Page 295 of 332
ARTIST: SUSAN CUMMINGS<br />
CONTRACT #: A7777<br />
TITLE OF PROGRAM: CO-PRODUCTION MANAGER FOR THE SHOW -<br />
DRACULA<br />
TYPE OF PROGRAM: RESIDENCY<br />
DISTRICT/ SCHOOL: PUTNAM VALLEY/PUTNAM VALLEY HIGH SCHOOL<br />
# OF TEACHERS: 2<br />
# OF STUDENTS: 50 GRADE(S) 9-12<br />
DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 11/1-12/5/11<br />
NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />
STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 X STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />
1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />
ARTIST: SUSAN FRIED<br />
CONTRACT #: A7996<br />
TITLE OF PROGRAM: ART & CULTURE OF YOGA<br />
TYPE OF PROGRAM: WORKSHOP<br />
DISTRICT/ SCHOOL: NEW ROCHELLE/JEFFERSON ELEM.<br />
# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />
# OF STUDENTS: 400 GRADE(S) K-5<br />
DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 1/4-2/15/12<br />
NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />
STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 X STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4 X<br />
1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />
1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />
2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />
3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />
4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />
5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />
6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />
7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />
NONE<br />
8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />
NONE<br />
9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />
NONE<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
1.<br />
2.<br />
3.<br />
4.<br />
5.<br />
6.<br />
STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />
ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />
EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />
ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />
TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />
QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />
SUSAN IS FANTASTIC. SHE HAS A WONDERFUL WAY OF WORKING<br />
WITH CHILDREN. TEACHES THEM EVERYTHING SHE KNOWS.<br />
8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />
NONE<br />
9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />
NONE<br />
ARTIST: SUSAN HOOVER<br />
CONTRACT #: A7577<br />
TITLE OF PROGRAM: POETRY RESIDENCY<br />
TYPE OF PROGRAM: RESIDENCY<br />
DISTRICT/ SCHOOL: BYRAM HILLS/H.C. CRITTENDEN MIDDLE SCHOOL<br />
# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />
# OF STUDENTS: 225 GRADE(S) 6<br />
DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 9/21-11/9/11<br />
NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />
STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 X STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />
ARTIST: SUSAN KAUFMAN<br />
CONTRACT #: A8582<br />
TITLE OF PROGRAM: CREATING A MURAL<br />
TYPE OF PROGRAM: RESIDENCY<br />
DISTRICT/ SCHOOL: PELHAM/PELHAM MIDDLE SCHOOL<br />
# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />
# OF STUDENTS: 200 GRADE(S) 8<br />
DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 3/13-22/12<br />
NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />
STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 X STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />
1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />
1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />
1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />
2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />
3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />
4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />
5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />
6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />
7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />
STUDENTS WERE ENGAGED AND PRODUCED GREAT POETRY.<br />
8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />
NONE<br />
9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />
GREAT JOB AS USUAL.<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
1.<br />
2.<br />
3.<br />
4.<br />
5.<br />
6.<br />
STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />
ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />
EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />
ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />
TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />
QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />
SUSAN IS AN AMAZING ARTIST AND TEACHER. THE STUDENTS<br />
WERE ENGAGED AND ABLE TO CREATE A SOPHISTICATED MURAL.<br />
8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />
NONE<br />
9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />
NONE<br />
Arts in Education Service - School Evaluations <strong>2011</strong>-<strong>2012</strong><br />
Page 296 of 332
ARTIST: SUSAN MACY<br />
CONTRACT #: A8447<br />
TITLE OF PROGRAM: AUTHOR VISIT<br />
TYPE OF PROGRAM: ASSEMBLY<br />
DISTRICT/ SCHOOL:<br />
# OF TEACHERS: 3<br />
BRIARCLIFF/TODD ELEM.<br />
# OF STUDENTS: 112 GRADE(S) 5<br />
DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 2/9/12<br />
NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />
STANDARD 1 STANDARD 2 STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4 X<br />
ARTIST: SUSAN PARKS<br />
CONTRACT #: A8145<br />
TITLE OF PROGRAM: ARTISAN SOAP MAKING<br />
TYPE OF PROGRAM: WORKSHOP<br />
DISTRICT/ SCHOOL: LAKELAND/COPPER BEECH MIDDLE SCHOOL<br />
# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />
# OF STUDENTS: 125 GRADE(S) 7 & 8<br />
DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 3/8-9/12<br />
NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />
STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 X STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />
1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />
1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />
1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />
2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />
3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />
4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />
5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />
6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />
7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />
SHE HAD A LOT OF INTERESTING INFORMATION TO SHARE.<br />
8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />
SHE SEEMS A LITTLE NERVOUS AT TIMES AND COULD HAVE BEEN<br />
MORE DYNAMIC.<br />
9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />
NONE<br />
ARTIST: SUSAN SKELSEY<br />
CONTRACT #: A7733A<br />
TITLE OF PROGRAM: LEARNING TO LOOK - LATE 18TH & 19TH CENTURY<br />
EUROPEAN ART<br />
TYPE OF PROGRAM: WORKSHOP<br />
DISTRICT/ SCHOOL:<br />
CHAPPAQUA/ALL ELEM. SCHOOLS<br />
# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />
# OF STUDENTS: GRADE(S) K-4<br />
DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE<br />
10/19/11-4/20/12<br />
NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />
STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 X STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4 X<br />
3<br />
3<br />
4<br />
3<br />
4<br />
4<br />
1.<br />
2.<br />
3.<br />
4.<br />
5.<br />
6.<br />
STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />
ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />
EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />
ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />
TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />
QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
N/<br />
7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />
STUDENTS REALLY ENJOYED THIS WORKSHOP AND ARE ALWAYS<br />
EXCITED TO GET THEIR SOAP CREATIONS BACK.<br />
8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />
NONE<br />
9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />
THIS YEAR WE ADDED A SMART BOARD ACITIVITY TO THE<br />
BEGINNING TO ADD VISUAL SUPPORT.<br />
ARTIST: SUZANNE HALL-FRITSCH<br />
CONTRACT #: A8249<br />
TITLE OF PROGRAM: COSTUME DESIGNER FOR THE SHOW - THE<br />
DROWSY CHAPERONE<br />
TYPE OF PROGRAM: RESIDENCY<br />
DISTRICT/ SCHOOL:<br />
KATONAH/LEWISBORO/JOHN JAY MIDDLE SCHOOL<br />
# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />
# OF STUDENTS: 75 GRADE(S) 6-8<br />
DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE<br />
1/15-3/15/12<br />
NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />
STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 X STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />
1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />
1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />
1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />
2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />
3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />
4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />
5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />
6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />
7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />
LEARNING TO LOOK IS AN INTERACTIVE APPROACH TO ART<br />
HISTORY. IT TEACHES STUDENTS TO BREAK DOWN A WORK OF<br />
ART INTO ITS ESSENTIAL QUALITIES AND MAKES ANY WORK OF<br />
ART APPROACHABLE AND EXCITING.<br />
8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />
NONE<br />
9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />
AWESOME PROGRAM. THE STUDENTS REALLY LOVE IT.<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />
2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />
3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />
4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />
5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />
6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />
7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />
THE COSTUMES WERE OUTSTANDING.<br />
8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />
NONE<br />
9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />
NONE<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
N/<br />
Arts in Education Service - School Evaluations <strong>2011</strong>-<strong>2012</strong><br />
Page 297 of 332
ARTIST: SUZANNE HALL-FRITSCH<br />
CONTRACT #: A7641<br />
TITLE OF PROGRAM: COSTUME DESIGNER FOR THE SHOW - TWILIGHT<br />
ZONE<br />
TYPE OF PROGRAM: RESIDENCY<br />
DISTRICT/ SCHOOL: KATONAH/LEWISBORO/JOHN JAY MIDDLE SCHOOL<br />
# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />
# OF STUDENTS: 43 GRADE(S) 6-8<br />
DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 10/3-11/8/11<br />
NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />
STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 X STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />
ARTIST: TAMMY MARGARET BURGUS<br />
CONTRACT #: A7703<br />
TITLE OF PROGRAM: PRODUCER FOR THE FALL MUSICAL - ANNIE GET<br />
YOUR GUN<br />
TYPE OF PROGRAM: RESIDENCY<br />
DISTRICT/ SCHOOL: LAKELAND/WALTER PANAS HIGH SCHOOL<br />
# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />
# OF STUDENTS: 100 GRADE(S) 9-12<br />
DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 10/3-11/19/11<br />
NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />
STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 X STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />
1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />
1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />
1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />
2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />
3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />
4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />
5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />
6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />
2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />
3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />
4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />
5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />
6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM?<br />
SUZANNE ALWAYS DOES A SUPERB JOB.<br />
Y<br />
WHY?<br />
7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM?<br />
NONE<br />
Y<br />
WHY?<br />
8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />
NONE<br />
9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />
NONE<br />
8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />
NONE<br />
9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />
NONE<br />
ARTIST: TAMMY MARGARET BURGUS<br />
CONTRACT #: A8319<br />
TITLE OF PROGRAM: PRODUCER FOR THE FALL MUSICAL - MY FAIR LADY<br />
TYPE OF PROGRAM: RESIDENCY<br />
DISTRICT/ SCHOOL: LAKELAND/WALTER PANAS HIGH SCHOOL<br />
# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />
# OF STUDENTS: 200 GRADE(S) 9-12<br />
DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 2/21-5/5/12<br />
NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />
STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 X STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />
ARTIST: TAR BEACH DIGITAL, INC.<br />
CONTRACT #: A8138<br />
TITLE OF PROGRAM: LAUGHING PIZZA BAND<br />
TYPE OF PROGRAM: ASSEMBLY<br />
DISTRICT/ SCHOOL:<br />
# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />
ARDSLEY/CONCORD ROAD ELEM.<br />
# OF STUDENTS: 700 GRADE(S) K-4<br />
DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 12/12/11<br />
NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />
STANDARD 1 STANDARD 2 STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />
1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />
1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />
1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />
2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />
3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />
4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />
5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />
6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />
7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />
ALWAYS A PLEASURE.<br />
8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />
NONE<br />
9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />
NONE<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />
2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />
3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />
4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />
5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />
6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />
7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />
WHILE THIS WAS A FUN AND INTERACTIVE ASSEMBLY, THE<br />
EDUCATIONAL QUALITY NEEDED TO BE ENHANCED. FURTHER<br />
EMPHASIS ON THE WRITING PROCESS AND MORE FACE TIME WITH<br />
THE LIVE PERFORMERS.<br />
8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />
GREATER EMPHASIS ON HOW TO GENERATE IDEAS AND CREATE A<br />
SONG.<br />
9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />
THE STUDENTS TRULY ENJOYED THE PERFORMANCE.<br />
4<br />
3.5<br />
2<br />
3.5<br />
4<br />
N/<br />
Arts in Education Service - School Evaluations <strong>2011</strong>-<strong>2012</strong><br />
Page 298 of 332
ARTIST:<br />
TECHNICAL DIRECTIONS, LLC<br />
CONTRACT #: A8858<br />
TITLE OF PROGRAM: CLIFF BRUNO - LIGHTING & SOUND DESIGNER FOR<br />
OSSINING LIVE SHOW<br />
TYPE OF PROGRAM: RESIDENCY<br />
DISTRICT/ SCHOOL:<br />
OSSINING/OSSINING HIGH SCHOOL<br />
# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />
# OF STUDENTS: GRADE(S) 12<br />
DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE<br />
6/1/12<br />
NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />
STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 X STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />
1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />
1.<br />
2.<br />
3.<br />
4.<br />
5.<br />
6.<br />
STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />
ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />
EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />
ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />
TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />
QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />
CLIFF AND HIS CREW WORKED GREAT. THE CHILDREN LEARNED A<br />
LOT AND GOT TO SEE A DIFFERENT TYPE OF PRODUCTION STYLE.<br />
8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />
NONE<br />
9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />
NONE<br />
ARTIST: TECHNICAL DIRECTIONS, LLC<br />
CONTRACT #: A8495<br />
TITLE OF PROGRAM: CLIFF BRUNO - LIGHTING DESIGN MATTHEW<br />
RODRIGUEZ SOUND DESIGNER FOR SHOW - BEAUTY<br />
& THE BEAST JR.<br />
TYPE OF PROGRAM: RESIDENCY<br />
DISTRICT/ SCHOOL:<br />
CHAPPAQUA/WESTORCHARD ELEM.<br />
# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />
# OF STUDENTS: 105 GRADE(S) 2-4<br />
DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE<br />
4/23-29/12<br />
NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />
STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 X STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />
1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />
ARTIST: TECHNICAL DIRECTIONS, LLC<br />
CONTRACT #: A8187A<br />
TITLE OF PROGRAM: CLIFF BRUNO - LIGHTING DESIGN & MATTHEW<br />
RODRIQUEZ -SOUND DESIGNER FOR SHOW -<br />
BEAUTY AND THE BEAST<br />
TYPE OF PROGRAM: RESIDENCY<br />
DISTRICT/ SCHOOL:<br />
CHAPPAQUA/SEVEN BRIDGES MIDDLE SCHOOL<br />
# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />
# OF STUDENTS: GRADE(S) 5-8<br />
DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 1/30-2/12/12<br />
NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />
STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 X STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />
1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />
1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />
2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />
3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />
4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />
5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />
6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />
7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />
THEY PAID INDIVIDUAL ATTENTION TO EACH STUDENT WORKING<br />
TECH. ALL GOT HANDS ON EXPERIENCE.<br />
8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />
NONE<br />
9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />
NONE<br />
ARTIST: TECHNICAL DIRECTIONS, LLC<br />
CONTRACT #: A8586<br />
TITLE OF PROGRAM: CLIFF BRUNO - LIGHTING DESIGNER FOR THE<br />
SHOW - FOOTLOOSE<br />
TYPE OF PROGRAM: RESIDENCY<br />
DISTRICT/ SCHOOL:<br />
CHAPPAQUA/BELL MIDDLE SCHOOL<br />
# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />
# OF STUDENTS: GRADE(S) 5-8<br />
DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 3/14-25/12<br />
NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />
STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 X STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />
1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
1.<br />
2.<br />
3.<br />
4.<br />
5.<br />
6.<br />
STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />
ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />
EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />
ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />
TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />
QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
N/<br />
7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />
CLIFF AND THE ENTIRE STAFF WERE GREAT TO WORK WITH AND<br />
WERE TERRIFIC WITH THE STUDENTS. THE KIDS GAINED SO MUCH<br />
FROM INCORPORATIVE TECHNICAL EFFECTS INTO THIS THEATRE<br />
PROGRAM.<br />
8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />
NONE<br />
9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />
NONE<br />
1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />
2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />
3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />
4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />
5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />
6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />
7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />
GOOD PROGRAM.<br />
8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />
NONE<br />
9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />
NONE<br />
4<br />
4<br />
4<br />
4<br />
3<br />
N/<br />
Arts in Education Service - School Evaluations <strong>2011</strong>-<strong>2012</strong><br />
Page 299 of 332
ARTIST: TECHNICAL DIRECTIONS, LLC<br />
CONTRACT #: A8572<br />
TITLE OF PROGRAM: DEVON ALLEN - LIGHTING DESIGNER FOR THE<br />
SHOW - BEAUTY AND THE BEAST<br />
TYPE OF PROGRAM: RESIDENCY<br />
DISTRICT/ SCHOOL: PLEASANTVILLE/PLEASANTVILLE HIGH SCHOOL<br />
# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />
# OF STUDENTS: 1000 GRADE(S) 9-12<br />
DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 2/27-3/19/12<br />
NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />
STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 X STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4 X<br />
ARTIST: TECHNICAL DIRECTIONS, LLC<br />
CONTRACT #: A8596<br />
TITLE OF PROGRAM: JEFF MILLER - SOUND DESIGNER FOR THE SHOW -<br />
BEAUTY AND THE BEAST<br />
TYPE OF PROGRAM: RESIDENCY<br />
DISTRICT/ SCHOOL: PLEASANTVILLE/PLEASANTVILLE HIGH SCHOOL<br />
# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />
# OF STUDENTS: 1000 GRADE(S) 9-12<br />
DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 2/27-3/21/12<br />
NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />
STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 X STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />
1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />
1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />
1.<br />
2.<br />
3.<br />
4.<br />
5.<br />
6.<br />
STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />
ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />
EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />
ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />
TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />
QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />
WORKING WITH DEVON WAS A VALUABLE EXPERIENCE FOR OUT<br />
STUDENTS. THE ARTISTIC RESULT OF HIS WORK ENHANCES<br />
EVERY ASPECT OF THE PRODUCTION.<br />
8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />
NONE<br />
9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />
NONE<br />
ARTIST: TECHNICAL DIRECTIONS, LLC<br />
CONTRACT #: A8187B<br />
TITLE OF PROGRAM: PHIL BELGRAVE - SOUND DESIGNER FOR SHOW -<br />
SEUSSICAL JR.<br />
TYPE OF PROGRAM: RESIDENCY<br />
DISTRICT/ SCHOOL:<br />
CHAPPAQUA/SEVEN BRIDGES MIDDLE SCHOOL<br />
# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />
# OF STUDENTS: GRADE(S) 5-8<br />
DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE<br />
2/6-12/12<br />
NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />
STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 X STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />
1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />
1.<br />
2.<br />
3.<br />
4.<br />
5.<br />
6.<br />
STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />
ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />
EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />
ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />
TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />
QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />
KNOWLEDGEABLE AND CLEARLY EXPLAINED TECHNICAL ASPECTS.<br />
8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />
NONE<br />
9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />
NONE<br />
1.<br />
2.<br />
3.<br />
4.<br />
5.<br />
6.<br />
STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />
ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />
EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />
ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />
TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />
QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
N/<br />
7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />
HAVING A PROFESSIONAL SOUND DESIGNER WORK WITH THE<br />
STUDENTS TEACHES THEM SKILLS THEY CAN ONLY LEARN IN<br />
PRODUCTION AND FROM A PROFESSIONAL WITH THIS EXPERTISE.<br />
8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />
NONE<br />
9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />
NONE<br />
ARTIST: TECHNICAL DIRECTIONS, LLC<br />
CONTRACT #: A8850<br />
TITLE OF PROGRAM: R.J. THOMAS - LIGHTING DESIGNER - PHIL<br />
BELGRAVE - SOUND DESIGNER FOR THE SHOW -<br />
PETER PAN<br />
TYPE OF PROGRAM: RESIDENCY<br />
DISTRICT/ SCHOOL: CHAPPAQUA/ROARING BROOK ELEM.<br />
# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />
# OF STUDENTS: 113 GRADE(S) 2-4<br />
DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 5/21-6/3/12<br />
NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />
STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 X STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />
1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />
1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />
2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />
3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />
4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />
5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />
6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />
7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />
NONE<br />
8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />
NONE<br />
9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />
THEY DID A GREAT JOB THIS YEAR. THE SHOW WENT ON WITHOUT<br />
ANY PROBLEMS.<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
N/<br />
Arts in Education Service - School Evaluations <strong>2011</strong>-<strong>2012</strong><br />
Page 300 of 332
ARTIST: TESSA LIEBMAN<br />
CONTRACT #: A8602<br />
TITLE OF PROGRAM: PHOTOGRAPHY COMPOSITIONS / SUBJECT 'FOOD'<br />
TYPE OF PROGRAM: RESIDENCY<br />
DISTRICT/ SCHOOL: LAKELAND/COPPER BEECH MIDDLE SCHOOL<br />
# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />
# OF STUDENTS: 50 GRADE(S) 7<br />
DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 3/9-23/12<br />
NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />
STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 X STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />
ARTIST: THE AMERICAN SONGBOOK PROJECT CONTRACT #: A7971<br />
TITLE OF PROGRAM: GREAT AMERICAN SONGS<br />
TYPE OF PROGRAM: ASSEMBLY<br />
DISTRICT/ SCHOOL:<br />
# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />
TUCKAHOE/W. E. COTTLE ELEM.<br />
# OF STUDENTS: GRADE(S) K-8<br />
DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 11/22/11<br />
NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />
STANDARD 1 STANDARD 2 STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4 X<br />
1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />
1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />
1.<br />
2.<br />
3.<br />
4.<br />
5.<br />
6.<br />
STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />
ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />
EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />
ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />
TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />
QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
N/<br />
7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />
STUDENTS REALLY RESPONDED TO HER AND OBVIOUSLY<br />
ENJOYED WORKING WITH HER. THEY ARE VERY EXICTED TO SEE<br />
THEIR WORK IN PRINT.<br />
8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />
NONE<br />
9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />
NONE<br />
1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />
2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />
3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />
4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />
5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />
6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />
7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />
THEY ARE SIMPLY OUTSTANDING. TO HAVE THIS CALIBER OF<br />
TALENT IN OUR SCHOOL WAS INCREDIBLE.<br />
8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />
NONE<br />
9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />
NONE<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
ARTIST: THE CULMINATIONS GROUP<br />
CONTRACT #: A8746<br />
TITLE OF PROGRAM: HENRY CHAPIN - SQUARE DANCING<br />
TYPE OF PROGRAM: ASSEMBLY<br />
DISTRICT/ SCHOOL: DOBBS FERRY/SPRINGHURST ELEM.<br />
# OF TEACHERS: 6<br />
# OF STUDENTS: 120 GRADE(S) 2<br />
DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 6/13/12<br />
NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />
STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 STANDARD 3 STANDARD 4 X<br />
ARTIST: THE EMPTY VESSEL, INC<br />
CONTRACT #: A7619A<br />
TITLE OF PROGRAM: SARAH BAEHR - ADVANCED CLAY<br />
TYPE OF PROGRAM: WORKSHOP<br />
DISTRICT/ SCHOOL:<br />
# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />
PELHAM/HUTCHINSON ELEM.<br />
# OF STUDENTS: 7 GRADE(S) 3-5<br />
DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 10/12-11/23/11<br />
NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />
STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 X STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />
1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />
1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />
1.<br />
2.<br />
3.<br />
4.<br />
5.<br />
6.<br />
STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />
ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />
EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />
ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />
TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />
QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
N/<br />
7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />
THE CHILDREN LEARN A VARIETY OF DANCES AND FORMATIONS<br />
THROUGH CLEAR DIRECTIONS AND DEMONSTRATIONS. THE<br />
SONGS WERE AGE APPROPRIATE.<br />
8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />
NONE<br />
9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />
YOUNG AND OLD ALWAYS ENJOY THEMSELVES.<br />
1.<br />
2.<br />
3.<br />
4.<br />
5.<br />
6.<br />
STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />
ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />
EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />
ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />
TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />
QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />
SARAH IS A PLEASURE TO WORK WITH. SHE IS A SERIOUS ARTIST<br />
THAT LOVES SHARING HER CRAFT WITH HER STUDENTS. THE<br />
FINISHED PROJECTS ARE AMAZING.<br />
8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />
NONE<br />
9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />
NONE<br />
Arts in Education Service - School Evaluations <strong>2011</strong>-<strong>2012</strong><br />
Page 301 of 332
ARTIST: THE EMPTY VESSEL, INC.<br />
CONTRACT #: A8373A<br />
TITLE OF PROGRAM: SARAH BAEHR - ADVANCED CLAY<br />
TYPE OF PROGRAM: WORKSHOP<br />
DISTRICT/ SCHOOL:<br />
# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />
PELHAM/HUTCHINSON ELEM.<br />
# OF STUDENTS: 11 GRADE(S) 3-5<br />
DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 2/9-4/5/12<br />
NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />
STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 X STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />
ARTIST: THE EMPTY VESSEL, INC.<br />
CONTRACT #: A7619B<br />
TITLE OF PROGRAM: SARAH BAEHR - BEGINNING CLAY<br />
TYPE OF PROGRAM: WORKSHOP<br />
DISTRICT/ SCHOOL:<br />
# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />
PELHAM/HUTCHINSON ELEM.<br />
# OF STUDENTS: 8 GRADE(S) 3-5<br />
DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 10/14-12/9/11<br />
NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />
STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 X STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />
1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />
1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />
1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />
2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />
3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />
4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />
5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />
6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />
2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />
3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />
4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />
5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />
6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM?<br />
SARAH IS A PLEASURE TO WORK WITH.<br />
8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />
NONE<br />
9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />
NONE<br />
Y<br />
WHY?<br />
7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />
SARAH IS A PLEASURE TO WORK WITH. SHE HAS AN IMMENSE<br />
AMOUNT OF PATIENCE FOR HER STUDENTS. THE FINISHED<br />
PRODUCTS CONTINUE TO AMAZE PARENTS YEAR AFTER YEAR.<br />
8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />
NONE<br />
9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />
NONE<br />
ARTIST: THE EMPTY VESSEL, INC.<br />
CONTRACT #: A8373C<br />
TITLE OF PROGRAM: SARAH BAEHR - BEGINNING CLAY<br />
TYPE OF PROGRAM: WORKSHOP<br />
DISTRICT/ SCHOOL:<br />
# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />
PELHAM/HUTCHINSON ELEM.<br />
# OF STUDENTS: 8 GRADE(S) 3-5<br />
DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 2/14-4/3/12<br />
NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />
STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 X STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />
ARTIST: THE EMPTY VESSEL, INC.<br />
CONTRACT #: A7661<br />
TITLE OF PROGRAM: SARAH BAEHR - CLAY SCULPTING<br />
TYPE OF PROGRAM: WORKSHOP<br />
DISTRICT/ SCHOOL: EASTCHESTER/GREENVALE ELEM.<br />
# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />
# OF STUDENTS: 10 GRADE(S) 4 & 5<br />
DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 10/19-12/14/11<br />
NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />
STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 X STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />
1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />
1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />
1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />
2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />
3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />
4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />
5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />
6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />
7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />
SARAH IS A PLEASURE TO WORK WITH. SHE IS EXTREMELY<br />
ENTHUSIASTIC AND THE STUDENTS LOVE WORKING WITH HER.<br />
8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />
NONE<br />
9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />
NONE<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
1.<br />
2.<br />
3.<br />
4.<br />
5.<br />
6.<br />
STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />
ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />
EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />
ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />
TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />
QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
N/<br />
7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />
CAN'T WAIT TO HAVE HER BACK TO TEACH MORE CLASSES. THE<br />
STUDENTS REALLY RESPOND TO HER INSTRUCTION AND THE<br />
QUALITY OF THEIR WORK IS AMAZING.<br />
8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />
NONE<br />
9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />
NONE<br />
Arts in Education Service - School Evaluations <strong>2011</strong>-<strong>2012</strong><br />
Page 302 of 332
ARTIST: THE EMPTY VESSEL, INC.<br />
CONTRACT #: A8608A<br />
TITLE OF PROGRAM: SARAH BAEHR - CLAY SCULPTING I<br />
TYPE OF PROGRAM: WORKSHOP<br />
DISTRICT/ SCHOOL: EASTCHESTER/GREENVALE ELEM.<br />
# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />
# OF STUDENTS: 12 GRADE(S) 2 & 3<br />
DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 3/13-5/8/12<br />
NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />
STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 X STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />
ARTIST: THE EMPTY VESSEL, INC.<br />
CONTRACT #: A8608B<br />
TITLE OF PROGRAM: SARAH BAEHR - CLAY SCULPTING II<br />
TYPE OF PROGRAM: WORKSHOP<br />
DISTRICT/ SCHOOL: EASTCHESTER/GREENVALE ELEM.<br />
# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />
# OF STUDENTS: 10 GRADE(S) 3-5<br />
DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 3/14-5/9/12<br />
NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />
STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 X STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />
1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />
1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />
1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />
2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />
3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />
4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />
5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />
6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
N/<br />
1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />
2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />
3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />
4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />
5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />
6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
N/<br />
7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM?<br />
SIMPLY WONDERFUL.<br />
Y<br />
WHY?<br />
7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM?<br />
SIMPLY WONDERFUL.<br />
Y<br />
WHY?<br />
8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />
NONE<br />
9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />
NONE<br />
8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />
NONE<br />
9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />
NONE<br />
ARTIST: THE EMPTY VESSEL, INC.<br />
CONTRACT #: A8373B<br />
TITLE OF PROGRAM: SARAH BAEHR - SCULPEY ANIMALS<br />
TYPE OF PROGRAM: WORKSHOP<br />
DISTRICT/ SCHOOL:<br />
# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />
PELHAM/HUTCHINSON ELEM.<br />
# OF STUDENTS: 9 GRADE(S) 5<br />
DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 2/9-4/5/12<br />
NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />
STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 X STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />
ARTIST: THE HOBBY QUEST<br />
CONTRACT #: A8092<br />
TITLE OF PROGRAM: ALEX DAVIDSON - MAGIC<br />
TYPE OF PROGRAM: WORKSHOP<br />
DISTRICT/ SCHOOL:<br />
# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />
CHAPPAQUA/GRAFFLIN ELEM.<br />
# OF STUDENTS: 12 GRADE(S) K-2<br />
DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 3/9-12/12<br />
NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />
STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 X STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />
1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />
1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />
1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />
2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />
3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />
4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />
5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />
6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />
7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />
SARAH IS A PLEASURE TO WORK WITH. HER ENTHUSIASM FOR<br />
THE PROGRAM IS EXCEPTIONAL.<br />
8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />
NONE<br />
9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />
NONE<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
1.<br />
2.<br />
3.<br />
4.<br />
5.<br />
6.<br />
STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />
ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />
EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />
ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />
TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />
QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />
4<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />
INCREDIBLE INSTRUCTOR. WOULD LOVE TO HAVE HIM BACK. THE<br />
STUDENTS REALLY ENJOYED HIS INSTRUCTION.<br />
8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />
NONE<br />
9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />
NONE<br />
Arts in Education Service - School Evaluations <strong>2011</strong>-<strong>2012</strong><br />
Page 303 of 332
ARTIST: THE HOBBY QUEST<br />
CONTRACT #: A8607<br />
TITLE OF PROGRAM: CAITLIN TURNER & MARCELLA CLARK - PROJECT<br />
RUNWAY / FASHION DESIGN<br />
TYPE OF PROGRAM: WORKSHOP<br />
DISTRICT/ SCHOOL: EASTCHESTER/GREENVALE ELEM.<br />
# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />
# OF STUDENTS: 14 GRADE(S) 2-5<br />
DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 3/14-5/9/12<br />
NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />
STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 X STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />
1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />
ARTIST: THE HOBBY QUEST<br />
CONTRACT #: A8282<br />
TITLE OF PROGRAM: MIRANDA AMITRANO - FASHION DESIGNING<br />
TYPE OF PROGRAM: WORKSHOP<br />
DISTRICT/ SCHOOL: KATONAH/LEWISBORO/KATONAH ELEM. SCHOOL<br />
# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />
# OF STUDENTS: 10 GRADE(S) 3-5<br />
DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 1/23-3/19/12<br />
NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />
STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 X STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />
1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />
1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />
2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />
3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />
4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />
5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />
6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />
7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />
NONE<br />
8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />
NONE<br />
9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />
NONE<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
N/<br />
1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />
2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />
3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />
4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />
5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />
6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />
7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />
PROFESSIONAL ORGANIZATION. INTERESTING CLASS WHICH<br />
ENGAGED THE STUDENTS.<br />
8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />
NONE<br />
9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />
NONE<br />
3<br />
3<br />
3<br />
3<br />
3<br />
3<br />
ARTIST: THE MUSIC PATH CO., INC<br />
CONTRACT #: A8593<br />
TITLE OF PROGRAM: MARY ELLEN MCCABE - READING MUSIC & PLAYING<br />
TUNES<br />
TYPE OF PROGRAM: WORKSHOP<br />
DISTRICT/ SCHOOL: EASTCHESTER/WAVERLY EARLY CHILDHOOD CTR<br />
# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />
# OF STUDENTS: 8 GRADE(S) K<br />
DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 3/12-5/7/12<br />
NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />
STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 X STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />
ARTIST: THE MUSIC PATH CO., INC.<br />
CONTRACT #: A7747<br />
TITLE OF PROGRAM: MARY ELLEN MCCABE - READING MUSIC & PLAYING<br />
TUNES<br />
TYPE OF PROGRAM: WORKSHOP<br />
DISTRICT/ SCHOOL: EASTCHESTER/WAVERLY EARLY CHILDHOOD CTR<br />
# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />
# OF STUDENTS: 7 GRADE(S) 1<br />
DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 10/13-12/8/11<br />
NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />
STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 X STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />
1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />
1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />
1.<br />
2.<br />
3.<br />
4.<br />
5.<br />
6.<br />
STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />
ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />
EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />
ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />
TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />
QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />
MUSIC START BALANCES FUN AND DEVELOPMENT OF SKILLS AND<br />
TEACHES THE CHILDREN STEP BY STEP HOW TO PLAY THE<br />
KEYBOARD.<br />
8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />
NONE<br />
9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />
NONE<br />
1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />
2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />
3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />
4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />
5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />
6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />
7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />
THE TEACHER WAS VERY HANDS-ON WITH THE CHILDREN. HE<br />
MAKED MUSIC INTERESTING AND FUN.<br />
8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />
NONE<br />
9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />
THE CHILDREN ENJOYED THE CLASS AND WE WILL ASK HIM BACK.<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
Arts in Education Service - School Evaluations <strong>2011</strong>-<strong>2012</strong><br />
Page 304 of 332
ARTIST: THE NATIVE AMERICAN INTERTRIBAL D<br />
CONTRACT #: A8015<br />
TITLE OF PROGRAM: ROBERT (LITTLE HAWK) MARTIN - NATIVE AMERICAN<br />
DANCES<br />
TYPE OF PROGRAM: ASSEMBLY<br />
DISTRICT/ SCHOOL: TARRYTOWN/JOHN PAULDING ELEM.<br />
# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />
# OF STUDENTS: GRADE(S) K<br />
DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 11/17/11<br />
NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />
STANDARD 1 STANDARD 2 STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4 X<br />
ARTIST: THE NATIVE AMERICAN INTERTRIBAL D CONTRACT #: A7636<br />
TITLE OF PROGRAM: ROBERT (LITTLE HAWK) MARTIN - NATIVE AMERICAN<br />
DANCES<br />
TYPE OF PROGRAM: ASSEMBLY<br />
DISTRICT/ SCHOOL: PLEASANTVILLE/PLEASANTVILLE MIDDLE SCHOOL<br />
# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />
# OF STUDENTS: 154 GRADE(S) 7<br />
DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 9/21-23/11<br />
NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />
STANDARD 1 STANDARD 2 STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4 X<br />
1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />
1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />
1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />
2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />
3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />
4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />
5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />
6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
N/<br />
1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />
2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />
3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />
4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />
5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />
6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM?<br />
NONE<br />
Y<br />
WHY?<br />
7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />
THE STUDENTS WERE ENGAGED AND ENJOYED THE ACTIVELY.<br />
8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />
WE WOULD LOVE A LIST OF THE WORDS HE TEACHES THE<br />
CHILDREN TO REFERENCE AFTER THE PERFORMANCE.<br />
9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />
NONE<br />
8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />
NONE<br />
9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />
KEEP UP THE GREAT WORK.<br />
ARTIST: THE PUPPET PEOPLE<br />
CONTRACT #: A7877<br />
TITLE OF PROGRAM: MARK CARRIGAN - BULLY BUSTERS PUPPET SHOW<br />
TYPE OF PROGRAM: ASSEMBLY<br />
DISTRICT/ SCHOOL: BREWSTER/GARDEN STREET ELEM.<br />
# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />
# OF STUDENTS: GRADE(S) K-3<br />
DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 10/27/11<br />
NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />
STANDARD 1 STANDARD 2 STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />
ARTIST: THE PUPPET PEOPLE<br />
CONTRACT #: A7669<br />
TITLE OF PROGRAM: MARK CARRIGAN - BULLY BUSTERS PUPPET SHOW<br />
TYPE OF PROGRAM: ASSEMBLY<br />
DISTRICT/ SCHOOL:<br />
# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />
BREWSTER/JFK ELEM.<br />
# OF STUDENTS: GRADE(S) K-3<br />
DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 10/26/11<br />
NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />
STANDARD 1 STANDARD 2 STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />
1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />
1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />
1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />
2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />
3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />
4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />
5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />
6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />
5<br />
4<br />
5<br />
4<br />
4<br />
5<br />
1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />
2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />
3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />
4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />
5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />
6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />
STUDENTS WERE ENGAGED THROUGHOUT THE WHOLE<br />
PERFORMANCE. TAUGHT A GOOD LESSON IN WAYS THAT<br />
CHILDREN COULD UNDERSTAND.<br />
8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />
NONE<br />
9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />
NONE<br />
7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />
GREAT SHOW, NOT TOO LONG. THE CHILDREN LOVED IT.<br />
8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />
NONE<br />
9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />
NONE<br />
Arts in Education Service - School Evaluations <strong>2011</strong>-<strong>2012</strong><br />
Page 305 of 332
ARTIST: THEATRE FOR A NEW AUDIENCE CONTRACT #: A8476<br />
TITLE OF PROGRAM: MELISSA HOUSE - WORLD THEATRE PROJECT<br />
RESIDENCY<br />
TYPE OF PROGRAM: RESIDENCY<br />
DISTRICT/ SCHOOL: IRVINGTON/IRVINGTON HIGH SCHOOL<br />
# OF TEACHERS: 2<br />
# OF STUDENTS: 120 GRADE(S) 10-12<br />
DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 2/29-4/18/12<br />
NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />
STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 X STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />
1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />
ARTIST: THEATREWORKS, USA<br />
CONTRACT #: A8303<br />
TITLE OF PROGRAM: COLOR OF JUSTICE<br />
TYPE OF PROGRAM: ASSEMBLY<br />
DISTRICT/ SCHOOL: SOMERS/SOMERS INTERMEDIATE SCHOOL<br />
# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />
# OF STUDENTS: 200 GRADE(S) 5<br />
DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 1/19/12<br />
NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />
STANDARD 1 STANDARD 2 STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4 X<br />
1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />
1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />
2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />
3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />
4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />
5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />
6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />
7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />
VERY WELL RECEIVED. I LOVED IT.<br />
8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />
NONE<br />
9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />
NONE<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />
2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />
3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />
4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />
5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />
6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />
7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />
NONE<br />
8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />
NONE<br />
9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />
NONE<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
4<br />
5<br />
ARTIST: THEATREWORKS, USA<br />
CONTRACT #: A8626B<br />
TITLE OF PROGRAM: DUCK FOR PRESIDENT SHOW<br />
TYPE OF PROGRAM: ASSEMBLY<br />
DISTRICT/ SCHOOL: NEW ROCHELLE/TRINITY ELEM. SCHOOL<br />
# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />
# OF STUDENTS: 450 GRADE(S) K-2<br />
DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 6/12/12<br />
NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />
STANDARD 1 STANDARD 2 STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />
ARTIST: THEATREWORKS, USA<br />
CONTRACT #: A7676<br />
TITLE OF PROGRAM: FANCY NANCY & OTHER STORIES<br />
TYPE OF PROGRAM: ASSEMBLY<br />
DISTRICT/ SCHOOL:<br />
# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />
SOMERS/PRIMROSE ELEM.<br />
# OF STUDENTS: 700 GRADE(S) K-2<br />
DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 5/27/12<br />
NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />
STANDARD 1 STANDARD 2 STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />
1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />
1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />
1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />
2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />
3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />
4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />
5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />
6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
N/<br />
1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />
2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />
3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />
4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />
5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />
6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />
5<br />
5<br />
4<br />
4<br />
5<br />
N/<br />
7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM?<br />
NONE<br />
Y<br />
WHY?<br />
7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM?<br />
WE LOVE THIS PROGRAM.<br />
Y<br />
WHY?<br />
8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />
NONE<br />
9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />
NONE<br />
8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />
NONE<br />
9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />
NONE<br />
Arts in Education Service - School Evaluations <strong>2011</strong>-<strong>2012</strong><br />
Page 306 of 332
ARTIST: THEATREWORKS, USA<br />
CONTRACT #: A8410<br />
TITLE OF PROGRAM: FELIX PITRE - STORIES & SONGS OF LATIN AMERICA<br />
TYPE OF PROGRAM: ASSEMBLY<br />
DISTRICT/ SCHOOL: NEW ROCHELLE/WARD ELEM. SCHOOL<br />
# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />
# OF STUDENTS: GRADE(S) 1-4<br />
DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 5/3/12<br />
NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />
STANDARD 1 STANDARD 2 STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4 X<br />
ARTIST: THEATREWORKS, USA<br />
CONTRACT #: A7763<br />
TITLE OF PROGRAM: FELIX PITRE - STORIES & SONGS OF LATIN AMERICA<br />
TYPE OF PROGRAM: ASSEMBLY<br />
DISTRICT/ SCHOOL:<br />
# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />
OSSINING/BROOKSIDE ELEM.<br />
# OF STUDENTS: 720 GRADE(S) 1 & 2<br />
DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 10/24/11<br />
NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />
STANDARD 1 STANDARD 2 STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4 X<br />
1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />
1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />
1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />
2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />
3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />
4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />
5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />
6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />
2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />
3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />
4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />
5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />
6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />
EXCELLENT PROGRAM. FELIX COMPLETELY CONNECTED WITH<br />
THE CHILDREN.<br />
8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />
NONE<br />
9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />
NONE<br />
7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM?<br />
NONE<br />
8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />
NONE<br />
9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />
NONE<br />
Y<br />
WHY?<br />
ARTIST: THEATREWORKS, USA<br />
CONTRACT #: A8796<br />
TITLE OF PROGRAM: FELIX PITRE - STORIES & SONGS OF LATIN AMERICA<br />
TYPE OF PROGRAM: ASSEMBLY<br />
DISTRICT/ SCHOOL:<br />
# OF TEACHERS: 10<br />
BRIARCLIFF/TODD ELEM.<br />
# OF STUDENTS: 112 GRADE(S) 5<br />
DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 5/31/12<br />
NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />
STANDARD 1 STANDARD 2 STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4 X<br />
ARTIST: THEATREWORKS, USA<br />
CONTRACT #: A8296<br />
TITLE OF PROGRAM: FELIX PITRE - STORIES & SONGS OF LATIN AMERICA<br />
TYPE OF PROGRAM: ASSEMBLY<br />
DISTRICT/ SCHOOL:<br />
# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />
CARMEL/PATERSON ELEM.<br />
# OF STUDENTS: 500 GRADE(S) K-4<br />
DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 1/30/12<br />
NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />
STANDARD 1 STANDARD 2 STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4 X<br />
1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />
1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />
1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />
2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />
3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />
4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />
5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />
6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />
2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />
3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />
4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />
5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />
6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
N/<br />
7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />
FELIX IS WONDERFUL AT ENGAGING STUDENTS WHILE GIVING<br />
THEM AN APPRECIATION OF A DIFFERENT CULTURE.<br />
8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />
NONE<br />
9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />
WE LOOK FORWARD TO HIS VISIT EVERY YEAR.<br />
7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />
VERY ENGAGING WITH MUSIC, STORY TELLING, PUPPETRY AND<br />
VENTRILOQUIST.<br />
8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />
NONE<br />
9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />
GOOD FEEDBACK.<br />
Arts in Education Service - School Evaluations <strong>2011</strong>-<strong>2012</strong><br />
Page 307 of 332
ARTIST: THEATREWORKS, USA<br />
CONTRACT #: A7522<br />
TITLE OF PROGRAM: JUNIE B. JONES<br />
TYPE OF PROGRAM: ASSEMBLY<br />
DISTRICT/ SCHOOL: CHAPPAQUA/ROARING BROOK ELEM.<br />
# OF TEACHERS: 5<br />
# OF STUDENTS: 300 GRADE(S) K-2<br />
DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 6/6/12<br />
NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />
STANDARD 1 STANDARD 2 STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />
ARTIST: THEATREWORKS, USA<br />
CONTRACT #: A8087A<br />
TITLE OF PROGRAM: LEWIS & CLARK SHOW<br />
TYPE OF PROGRAM: ASSEMBLY<br />
DISTRICT/ SCHOOL: NEW ROCHELLE/WARD ELEM. SCHOOL<br />
# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />
# OF STUDENTS: GRADE(S) 4 & 5<br />
DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 3/6/12<br />
NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />
STANDARD 1 STANDARD 2 STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />
1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />
1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />
1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />
2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />
3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />
4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />
5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />
6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
N/<br />
5<br />
N/<br />
1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />
2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />
3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />
4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />
5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />
6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />
IT WAS VERY WELL DONE AND ALL STUDENTS, FACILITY,<br />
TEACHERS, ETC. ENJOYED IT.<br />
8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />
IT WAS A LITTLE LONG FOR THE YOUNGER AUDIENCE.<br />
9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />
IT WAS A GREAT SHOW.<br />
7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM?<br />
NONE<br />
8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />
NONE<br />
9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />
NONE<br />
Y<br />
WHY?<br />
ARTIST: THEATREWORKS, USA<br />
CONTRACT #: A7994A<br />
TITLE OF PROGRAM: NATE THE GREAT SHOW<br />
TYPE OF PROGRAM: ASSEMBLY<br />
DISTRICT/ SCHOOL:<br />
# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />
CHAPPAQUA/GRAFFLIN ELEM.<br />
# OF STUDENTS: 75 GRADE(S) K-2<br />
DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 2/10/12<br />
NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />
STANDARD 1 STANDARD 2 STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />
ARTIST: THEATREWORKS, USA<br />
CONTRACT #: A7688<br />
TITLE OF PROGRAM: PATRICK GARNER - AMERICAN TALL TALES<br />
TYPE OF PROGRAM: ASSEMBLY<br />
DISTRICT/ SCHOOL: PUTNAM VALLEY/PUTNAM VALLEY ELEM.<br />
# OF TEACHERS: 5<br />
# OF STUDENTS: 125 GRADE(S) 3<br />
DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 3/14/12<br />
NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />
STANDARD 1 STANDARD 2 STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4 X<br />
1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />
1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />
1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />
2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />
3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />
4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />
5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />
6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />
4<br />
4<br />
3<br />
4<br />
4<br />
N/<br />
1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />
2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />
3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />
4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />
5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />
6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM?<br />
DELIGHTFUL, AGE APPROPRIATE.<br />
8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />
NONE<br />
9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />
NONE<br />
Y<br />
WHY?<br />
7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />
THIS ASSEMBLY FIT IN PERFECTLY WITH OUR 3RD GRADE<br />
CURRICULUM. PROGRAM WAS WELL DONE AND ENGAGING.<br />
8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />
NONE<br />
9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />
NONE<br />
Arts in Education Service - School Evaluations <strong>2011</strong>-<strong>2012</strong><br />
Page 308 of 332
ARTIST: THEATREWORKS, USA<br />
CONTRACT #: A7999<br />
TITLE OF PROGRAM: QUEEN NUR SWEET POTATO PIE & SUCH<br />
TYPE OF PROGRAM: ASSEMBLY<br />
DISTRICT/ SCHOOL:<br />
# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />
OSSINING/BROOKSIDE ELEM.<br />
# OF STUDENTS: 700 GRADE(S) 2 & 3<br />
DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 1/23/12<br />
NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />
STANDARD 1 STANDARD 2 STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4 X<br />
1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />
ARTIST: THEATREWORKS, USA<br />
CONTRACT #: A7997<br />
TITLE OF PROGRAM: QUEEN NUR SWEET POTATO PIE & SUCH & VOICES<br />
OF COURAGE<br />
TYPE OF PROGRAM: ASSEMBLY<br />
DISTRICT/ SCHOOL: NEW ROCHELLE/WARD ELEM. SCHOOL<br />
# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />
# OF STUDENTS: 1100 GRADE(S) K-5<br />
DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 2/7/12<br />
NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />
STANDARD 1 STANDARD 2 STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4 X<br />
1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />
1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />
2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />
3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />
4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />
5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />
6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />
7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />
CHILDREN LOVED IT.<br />
8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />
NONE<br />
9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />
NONE<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />
2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />
3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />
4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />
5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />
6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />
7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />
NONE<br />
8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />
NONE<br />
9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />
NONE<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
ARTIST: THEATREWORKS, USA<br />
CONTRACT #: A8144<br />
TITLE OF PROGRAM: RAMONA QUIMBY<br />
TYPE OF PROGRAM: ASSEMBLY<br />
DISTRICT/ SCHOOL: LAKELAND/BENJAMIN FRANKLIN ELEM.<br />
# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />
# OF STUDENTS: 275 GRADE(S) K-2<br />
DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 12/14/11<br />
NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />
STANDARD 1 STANDARD 2 STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />
ARTIST: THEATREWORKS, USA<br />
CONTRACT #: A8070B<br />
TITLE OF PROGRAM: RAMONA QUIMBY<br />
TYPE OF PROGRAM: ASSEMBLY<br />
DISTRICT/ SCHOOL: SOMERS/SOMERS INTERMEDIATE SCHOOL<br />
# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />
# OF STUDENTS: 268 GRADE(S) 3<br />
DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 5/29/12<br />
NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />
STANDARD 1 STANDARD 2 STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />
1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />
1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />
1.<br />
2.<br />
3.<br />
4.<br />
5.<br />
6.<br />
STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />
ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />
EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />
ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />
TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />
QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />
2<br />
1<br />
2<br />
2<br />
3<br />
N/<br />
7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? N WHY?<br />
WE WERE VERY EXCITED TO HAVE THIS SHOW. THE RAMONA<br />
SERIES IS A CLASSIC. HOWEVER, WE WERE DISAPPOINTED WITH<br />
THE LANGUAGE AND BULLYING REFERENCES. THE FATHER<br />
SMOKING AND THE TONE OF THE SHOW. OUR PRINCIPAL NEEDED<br />
TO CUT THE SHOW SHORT.<br />
8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />
NONE<br />
9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />
NONE<br />
1.<br />
2.<br />
3.<br />
4.<br />
5.<br />
6.<br />
STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />
ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />
EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />
ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />
TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />
QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />
THEY WERE AGE APPROPRIATE AND HELD THE ATTENTION OF THE<br />
STUDENTS<br />
8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />
NONE<br />
9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />
WE WILL CONTINUE TO BOOK THEM IN THE FUTURE.<br />
Arts in Education Service - School Evaluations <strong>2011</strong>-<strong>2012</strong><br />
Page 309 of 332
ARTIST: THEATREWORKS, USA<br />
CONTRACT #: A7690A<br />
TITLE OF PROGRAM: RETUMBA - JOURNEY THRU THE CARRIBBEAN ALL<br />
WOMEN SHOW<br />
TYPE OF PROGRAM: ASSEMBLY<br />
DISTRICT/ SCHOOL: NEW ROCHELLE/BARNARD EARLY CHILDHOOD CENT<br />
# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />
# OF STUDENTS: GRADE(S) PRE K-2<br />
DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 10/5/11<br />
NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />
STANDARD 1 STANDARD 2 STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4 X<br />
1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />
ARTIST: THEATREWORKS, USA<br />
CONTRACT #: A7690D<br />
TITLE OF PROGRAM: SEUSSICAL THE MUSICAL<br />
TYPE OF PROGRAM: ASSEMBLY<br />
DISTRICT/ SCHOOL: NEW ROCHELLE/BARNARD EARLY CHILDHOOD CENT<br />
# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />
# OF STUDENTS: 640 GRADE(S) PRE K-2<br />
DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 4/30/12<br />
NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />
STANDARD 1 STANDARD 2 STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />
1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />
1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />
2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />
3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />
4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />
5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />
6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />
7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />
EXCELLENT AS ALWAYS.<br />
8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />
NONE<br />
9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />
NONE<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />
2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />
3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />
4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />
5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />
6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />
7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />
THEY ARE EXTREMELY PROFESIONAL AND PROVIDE AN<br />
EXCELLENT SHOW FOR THE STUDENTS.<br />
8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />
NONE<br />
9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />
NONE<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
ARTIST: THEATREWORKS, USA<br />
CONTRACT #: A8589<br />
TITLE OF PROGRAM: SEUSSICAL THE MUSICAL<br />
TYPE OF PROGRAM: ASSEMBLY<br />
DISTRICT/ SCHOOL:<br />
# OF TEACHERS: 8<br />
TARRYTOWN/MORSE ELEM.<br />
# OF STUDENTS: 208 GRADE(S) 2<br />
DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 4/19/12<br />
NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />
STANDARD 1 STANDARD 2 STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />
ARTIST: THEATREWORKS, USA<br />
CONTRACT #: A7601<br />
TITLE OF PROGRAM: SEUSSICAL THE MUSICAL<br />
TYPE OF PROGRAM: ASSEMBLY<br />
DISTRICT/ SCHOOL: KATONAH/LEWISBORO/ALL ELEM. SCHOOLS<br />
# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />
# OF STUDENTS: 200 GRADE(S) 1-6<br />
DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 11/26/11<br />
NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />
STANDARD 1 STANDARD 2 STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />
1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />
1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />
1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />
2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />
3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />
4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />
5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />
6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />
7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />
WHAT A WONDERFUL INTRODUCTION TO MUSICAL SHOWS.<br />
8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />
NONE<br />
9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />
NONE<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
N/<br />
5<br />
5<br />
1.<br />
2.<br />
3.<br />
4.<br />
5.<br />
6.<br />
STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />
ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />
EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />
ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />
TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />
QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />
THE ACTORS WERE TALENTED, SPIRITED AND ENGAGED OUR<br />
STUDENTS IN A MEANINGFUL WAY. THE STUDENTS LOVED THE<br />
PERFORMANCE AND GAVE A SPONTANEOUS STANDING OVATION.<br />
8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />
NONE<br />
9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />
THANK YOU.<br />
Arts in Education Service - School Evaluations <strong>2011</strong>-<strong>2012</strong><br />
Page 310 of 332
ARTIST: THEATREWORKS, USA<br />
CONTRACT #: A8626A<br />
TITLE OF PROGRAM: THOMAS EDISON SHOW<br />
TYPE OF PROGRAM: ASSEMBLY<br />
DISTRICT/ SCHOOL: NEW ROCHELLE/TRINITY ELEM. SCHOOL<br />
# OF TEACHERS: 3<br />
# OF STUDENTS: 450 GRADE(S) 3-5<br />
DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 5/3/12<br />
NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />
STANDARD 1 STANDARD 2 STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />
ARTIST: THEATREWORKS, USA<br />
CONTRACT #: A7994B<br />
TITLE OF PROGRAM: WE THE PEOPLE<br />
TYPE OF PROGRAM: ASSEMBLY<br />
DISTRICT/ SCHOOL:<br />
# OF TEACHERS: 5<br />
CHAPPAQUA/GRAFFLIN ELEM.<br />
# OF STUDENTS: 105 GRADE(S) 3 & 4<br />
DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 3/26/12<br />
NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />
STANDARD 1 STANDARD 2 STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />
1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />
1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />
1.<br />
2.<br />
3.<br />
4.<br />
5.<br />
6.<br />
STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />
ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />
EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />
ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />
TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />
QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />
THIS PERFORMANCE NOT ONLY TAUGHT HISTORY AND SCIENCE IN<br />
AN ENTERTAINING WAY, IT REINFORCED THE VALUE OF HARD<br />
WORK AND PROBLEM SOLVING.<br />
8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />
NONE<br />
9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />
NONE<br />
1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />
2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />
3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />
4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />
5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />
6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />
7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? N WHY?<br />
TOO MUCH INFORMATION FOR 3RD AND 4TH GRADE.<br />
8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />
NONE<br />
9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />
MAY BE MORE APPROPRIATE FOR MIDDLE SCHOOL.<br />
3<br />
4<br />
N/<br />
2<br />
3<br />
3<br />
ARTIST: THEATREWORKS, USA<br />
CONTRACT #: A8070A<br />
TITLE OF PROGRAM: WE THE PEOPLE<br />
TYPE OF PROGRAM: ASSEMBLY<br />
DISTRICT/ SCHOOL: SOMERS/SOMERS INTERMEDIATE SCHOOL<br />
# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />
# OF STUDENTS: GRADE(S) 4<br />
DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 3/7/12<br />
NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />
STANDARD 1 STANDARD 2 STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />
ARTIST: THEATREWORKS, USA<br />
CONTRACT #: A8087B<br />
TITLE OF PROGRAM: WE THE PEOPLE<br />
TYPE OF PROGRAM: ASSEMBLY<br />
DISTRICT/ SCHOOL: NEW ROCHELLE/WARD ELEM. SCHOOL<br />
# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />
# OF STUDENTS: GRADE(S) 4 & 5<br />
DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 5/14/12<br />
NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />
STANDARD 1 STANDARD 2 STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />
1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />
1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />
1.<br />
2.<br />
3.<br />
4.<br />
5.<br />
6.<br />
STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />
ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />
EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />
ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />
TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />
QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
N/<br />
5<br />
4<br />
7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />
VERY EDUCATIONAL, LOTS OF INFORMATION GIVEN TO STUDENTS.<br />
8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />
NONE<br />
9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />
NONE<br />
1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />
2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />
3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />
4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />
5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />
6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />
7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />
THE SHOW WAS RIGHT IN LINE WITH OUR CURRICULUM.<br />
8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />
NONE<br />
9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />
NONE<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
N/<br />
Arts in Education Service - School Evaluations <strong>2011</strong>-<strong>2012</strong><br />
Page 311 of 332
ARTIST: THEATREWORKS, USA<br />
CONTRACT #: A7565<br />
TITLE OF PROGRAM: WE THE PEOPLE<br />
TYPE OF PROGRAM: ASSEMBLY<br />
DISTRICT/ SCHOOL: EASTCHESTER/GREENVALE ELEM.<br />
# OF TEACHERS: 11 # OF STUDENTS: 238 GRADE(S) 4 & 5<br />
DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 12/2/11<br />
NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />
STANDARD 1 STANDARD 2 STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />
ARTIST: THEATREWORKS, USA<br />
CONTRACT #: A8388<br />
TITLE OF PROGRAM: WE THE PEOPLE<br />
TYPE OF PROGRAM: ASSEMBLY<br />
DISTRICT/ SCHOOL: EASTCHESTER/ANNE HUTCHINSON ELEM.<br />
# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />
# OF STUDENTS: 22 GRADE(S) 4<br />
DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 3/27/12<br />
NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />
STANDARD 1 STANDARD 2 STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />
1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />
1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />
1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />
2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />
3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />
4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />
5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />
6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />
7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />
IT WAS EXTREMELY EDUCATIONAL IN AN ENTERTAINING WAY.<br />
8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />
NONE<br />
9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />
NONE<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
1.<br />
2.<br />
3.<br />
4.<br />
5.<br />
6.<br />
STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />
ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />
EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />
ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />
TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />
QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />
ALL STUDENTS WERE ENGAGED AND THE CONTENT WAS PERFECT.<br />
8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />
SOUND SYSTEM COULD BE A LITTLE BETTER.<br />
9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />
THIS ASSEMBLY WAS GREAT.<br />
ARTIST: THEATREWORKS, USA<br />
CONTRACT #: A7690C<br />
TITLE OF PROGRAM: YARINA<br />
TYPE OF PROGRAM: ASSEMBLY<br />
DISTRICT/ SCHOOL: NEW ROCHELLE/BARNARD EARLY CHILDHOOD CENT<br />
# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />
# OF STUDENTS: GRADE(S) PRE K-2<br />
DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 1/11/12<br />
NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />
STANDARD 1 STANDARD 2 STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4 X<br />
ARTIST: THEATREWORKS, USA<br />
CONTRACT #: A7690B<br />
TITLE OF PROGRAM: YELLOW BRICK ROAD<br />
TYPE OF PROGRAM: ASSEMBLY<br />
DISTRICT/ SCHOOL: NEW ROCHELLE/BARNARD EARLY CHILDHOOD CENT<br />
# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />
# OF STUDENTS: GRADE(S) PRE K-2<br />
DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 11/30/11<br />
NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />
STANDARD 1 STANDARD 2 STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />
1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />
1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />
1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />
2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />
3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />
4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />
5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />
6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />
2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />
3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />
4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />
5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />
6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />
THEY WERE INTERACTIVE AND THE CHILDREN ENJOYED THEIR<br />
PRESENTATION IMMENSELY.<br />
8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />
NONE<br />
9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />
THEY WERE AMAZING EXPECIALLY THEIR RAINFOREST SHOW.<br />
7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />
FABULOUS SHOW. HOPE TO HAVE IT RETURN NEXT YEAR.<br />
8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />
NONE<br />
9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />
NONE<br />
Arts in Education Service - School Evaluations <strong>2011</strong>-<strong>2012</strong><br />
Page 312 of 332
ARTIST: THOMAS GARDNER<br />
CONTRACT #: A7525A<br />
TITLE OF PROGRAM: THE UNCLE BROTHERS - CHARACTER ED: POSITIVE<br />
CHOICES, BULLING & KINDNESS<br />
TYPE OF PROGRAM: ASSEMBLY<br />
DISTRICT/ SCHOOL:<br />
# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />
LAKELAND/VAN CORT ELEM.<br />
# OF STUDENTS: 650 GRADE(S) K-5<br />
DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 10/7/11<br />
NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />
STANDARD 1 STANDARD 2 STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />
1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />
1.<br />
2.<br />
3.<br />
4.<br />
5.<br />
6.<br />
STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />
ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />
EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />
ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />
TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />
QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />
THEY PUT ON A FANTASTIC PROGRAM PROMOTING POSITIVE<br />
CHOICES AND ANTI-BULLYING. WE WERE VERY LUCKY TO HAVE<br />
THEM.<br />
8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />
NONE<br />
9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />
MY SCHOOL CAN'T WAIT UNTIL THEY COME BACK TO US IN THE<br />
SPRING.<br />
ARTIST: THOMAS GARDNER<br />
CONTRACT #: A7827<br />
TITLE OF PROGRAM: THE UNCLE BROTHERS - POSITIVE CHOICES<br />
TYPE OF PROGRAM: ASSEMBLY<br />
DISTRICT/ SCHOOL: LAKELAND/BENJAMIN FRANKLIN ELEM.<br />
# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />
# OF STUDENTS: 608 GRADE(S) K-5<br />
DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 10/26/11<br />
NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />
STANDARD 1 STANDARD 2 STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />
ARTIST: THOMAS GARDNER<br />
CONTRACT #: A7886<br />
TITLE OF PROGRAM: THE UNCLE BROTHERS - KINDNESS COUNTS<br />
TYPE OF PROGRAM: ASSEMBLY<br />
DISTRICT/ SCHOOL:<br />
CARMEL/PATERSON ELEM.<br />
# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />
# OF STUDENTS: 620 GRADE(S) K-4<br />
DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE<br />
11/30/11<br />
NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />
STANDARD 1 STANDARD 2 STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />
1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />
1.<br />
2.<br />
3.<br />
4.<br />
5.<br />
6.<br />
STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />
ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />
EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />
ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />
TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />
QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />
GREAT ENERGY, POSITIVE MESSAGES, AUDIENCE PARTICIPATION,<br />
DEEP REPETOIRE.<br />
8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />
NONE<br />
9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />
NONE<br />
ARTIST: THOMAS GARDNER<br />
CONTRACT #: A8500<br />
TITLE OF PROGRAM: THE UNCLE BROTHERS - STAND UP TO BULLYING<br />
TYPE OF PROGRAM: ASSEMBLY<br />
DISTRICT/ SCHOOL:<br />
LAKELAND/VAN CORT ELEM.<br />
# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />
# OF STUDENTS: 675 GRADE(S) K-5<br />
DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE<br />
2/24/12<br />
NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />
STANDARD 1 STANDARD 2 STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />
1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />
1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />
1.<br />
2.<br />
3.<br />
4.<br />
5.<br />
6.<br />
STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />
ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />
EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />
ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />
TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />
QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />
OUR STUDENTS LOOK FORWARD TO THE UNCLE BROTHERS EVERY<br />
YEAR.<br />
8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />
NONE<br />
9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />
WE USE THE UNCLE BROTHERS CD FOR CHARACTER EDUCATION<br />
AND OUR SCHOOL WIDE PBIS PROGRAM.<br />
1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />
2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />
3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />
4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />
5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />
6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />
7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />
TOMMY AND DANNY ARE AMAZING. ALL OF OUR STUDENTS<br />
PARTICIPATE IN AND LOVED THEIR SHOW.<br />
8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />
NONE<br />
9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />
WE CAN'T WAIT FOR THEM TO COME BACK.<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
Arts in Education Service - School Evaluations <strong>2011</strong>-<strong>2012</strong><br />
Page 313 of 332
ARTIST: THOMAS GARDNER<br />
CONTRACT #: A7525B<br />
TITLE OF PROGRAM: THE UNCLE BROTHERS SPARK YOUR IMAGINATION<br />
THROUGH READING<br />
TYPE OF PROGRAM: ASSEMBLY<br />
DISTRICT/ SCHOOL:<br />
# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />
LAKELAND/VAN CORT ELEM.<br />
# OF STUDENTS: 660 GRADE(S) K-5<br />
DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 5/10/12<br />
NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />
STANDARD 1 STANDARD 2 STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />
1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />
1.<br />
2.<br />
3.<br />
4.<br />
5.<br />
6.<br />
STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />
ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />
EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />
ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />
TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />
QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />
THESE GENTLEMEN DO A FANTASTIC JOB OF ENTERTAINING AND<br />
ENGAGING OUR STUDENTS.<br />
8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />
NONE<br />
9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />
THANKS FOR BEING SO FLEXIBLE AND ALWAYS PUTTING ON A<br />
GREAT SHOW.<br />
ARTIST: THOMAS RICHARDSON<br />
CONTRACT #: A8302<br />
TITLE OF PROGRAM: SET DESIGNER FOR THE SHOW - BYE, BYE BIRDIE<br />
TYPE OF PROGRAM: RESIDENCY<br />
DISTRICT/ SCHOOL:<br />
IRVINGTON/IRVINGTON HIGH SCHOOL<br />
# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />
# OF STUDENTS: 660 GRADE(S) 9-12<br />
DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE<br />
1/17-3/17/12<br />
NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />
STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 X STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />
1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />
ARTIST: THOMAS RICHARDSON<br />
CONTRACT #: A7635<br />
TITLE OF PROGRAM: SET DESIGNER FOR SHOW - THE WIZARD OF OZ<br />
TYPE OF PROGRAM: RESIDENCY<br />
DISTRICT/ SCHOOL: IRVINGTON/IRVINGTON HIGH SCHOOL<br />
# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />
# OF STUDENTS: 50 GRADE(S) 9-12<br />
DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 9/19-11/6/11<br />
NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />
STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 X STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />
1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />
1.<br />
2.<br />
3.<br />
4.<br />
5.<br />
6.<br />
STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />
ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />
EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />
ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />
TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />
QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
N/<br />
7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />
THE STUDENTS LEARN NOT ONLY THE SKILLS REQUIRED TO<br />
MOUNT A MUSICAL PRODUCTION, THEY LEARN RESPONSIBILITY TO<br />
OTHERS AND INDEPENDENCE.<br />
8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />
NONE<br />
9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />
ARTIST:<br />
THOMAS IS WONDERFUL WITH THE STUDENTS AND HAS GREAT<br />
ARTISTIC TALENT. HIS LEVEL OF COMMITMENT AND WORK ETHIC<br />
ARE PHENOMINAL.<br />
TIFFANY RADOVICH<br />
CONTRACT #: A8535<br />
TITLE OF PROGRAM: OBOE PLAYER FOR THE SHOW - ONCE UPON A<br />
MATTRESS<br />
TYPE OF PROGRAM: ASSEMBLY<br />
DISTRICT/ SCHOOL:<br />
SOMERS/SOMERS HIGH SCHOOL<br />
# OF TEACHERS: 2<br />
# OF STUDENTS: 50 GRADE(S) 9-12<br />
DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 3/12-18/12<br />
NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />
STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />
1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />
1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />
2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />
3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />
4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />
5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />
6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />
7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />
A GREAT PROGRAM FOR OUR SCHOOL.<br />
8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />
NONE<br />
9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />
NONE<br />
5<br />
4<br />
4<br />
4<br />
4<br />
N/<br />
1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />
2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />
3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />
4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />
5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />
6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />
7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />
NONE<br />
8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />
NONE<br />
9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />
NONE<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
Arts in Education Service - School Evaluations <strong>2011</strong>-<strong>2012</strong><br />
Page 314 of 332
ARTIST: TIMOTHY GREEN<br />
CONTRACT #: A8256<br />
TITLE OF PROGRAM: AUTHOR VISIT<br />
TYPE OF PROGRAM: ASSEMBLY<br />
DISTRICT/ SCHOOL: CHAPPAQUA/BELL MIDDLE SCHOOL<br />
# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />
# OF STUDENTS: 175 GRADE(S) 5<br />
DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 3/19/12<br />
NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />
STANDARD 1 STANDARD 2 STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />
1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />
ARTIST: TODD HALL<br />
CONTRACT #: A8524<br />
TITLE OF PROGRAM: CHOREOGRAPHY FOR THE SPRING MUSICAL - GUYS<br />
& DOLLS<br />
TYPE OF PROGRAM: RESIDENCY<br />
DISTRICT/ SCHOOL: KATONAH/LEWISBORO/JOHN JAY HIGH SCHOOL<br />
# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />
# OF STUDENTS: 40 GRADE(S) 9-12<br />
DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 2/17 & 18/12<br />
NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />
STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 X STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />
1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />
1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />
2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />
3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />
4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />
5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />
6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />
7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />
VERY ENGAGING. STUDENT RESPONDED VERY WELL.<br />
8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />
NONE<br />
9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />
NONE<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />
2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />
3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />
4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />
5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />
6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />
7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />
TERRIFIC PROGRAM, VERY ENTHUSIASTIC.<br />
8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />
NONE<br />
9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />
NONE<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
ARTIST: TODD STRASSER<br />
CONTRACT #: A8327<br />
TITLE OF PROGRAM: AUTHOR VISIT - HOW TO WRITE A BOOK<br />
TYPE OF PROGRAM: ASSEMBLY/WORKSHOP<br />
DISTRICT/ SCHOOL: EASTCHESTER/EASTCHESTER MIDDLE SCHOOL<br />
# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />
# OF STUDENTS: 250 GRADE(S) 8<br />
DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 2/15/12<br />
NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />
STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 X STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />
ARTIST: TRACEY C. PEARSON dba TRACEY CAM<br />
CONTRACT #: A8710<br />
TITLE OF PROGRAM: AUTHOR/ILLUSTRATOR VISIT<br />
TYPE OF PROGRAM: ASSEMBLY<br />
DISTRICT/ SCHOOL:<br />
# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />
YORKTOWN/BROOKSIDE ELEM.<br />
# OF STUDENTS: GRADE(S) K & 1<br />
DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 5/15/12<br />
NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />
STANDARD 1 STANDARD 2 STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />
1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />
1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />
1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />
2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />
3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />
4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />
5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />
6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />
7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />
THE PROGRAM WAS INSIGHTFUL AND PROVIDED ALL STUDENTS<br />
WITH THE OPPORTUNITY TO DELVE INTO THE PROCESS THAT<br />
AUTHORS GO THROUGH TO PUBLISH A BOOK.<br />
8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />
PROVIDE STUDENTS WITH MATERIALS.<br />
9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />
TODD WAS FLEXIBLE AND AMENABLE TO ALL SUGGESTIONS AND<br />
FEEDBACK FROM PREVIOUS YEARS.<br />
5<br />
4<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
3<br />
1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />
2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />
3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />
4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />
5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />
6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />
7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />
SHE IS WARM AND ENGAGING WITH THE STUDENTS, AND HER<br />
MESSAGE WAS CLEAR. YOU ARE ALREADY WRITERS AND<br />
ILLUSTRATORS. KEEP PRACTICING.<br />
8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />
NONE<br />
9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />
THE SPACE PROVIDED WAS NOT IDEAL. THE CAFETERIA WAS<br />
NOISY. SOUND QUALITY WAS AN ISSUE. TRACEY WORKED LIKE A<br />
TROOPER TO OVERCOME THAT BUT I THINK 2 CLASSES IN A<br />
CLASSROOM WOULD BE BETTER.<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
Arts in Education Service - School Evaluations <strong>2011</strong>-<strong>2012</strong><br />
Page 315 of 332
ARTIST: TRACY JOHNSON<br />
CONTRACT #: A8739<br />
TITLE OF PROGRAM: CHOREOGRAPHER FOR P.O.W.A. WOMEN'S HISTORY<br />
PERFORMANCE<br />
TYPE OF PROGRAM: RESIDENCY<br />
DISTRICT/ SCHOOL: MT.VERNON/MT. VERNON HIGH SCHOOL<br />
# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />
# OF STUDENTS: GRADE(S) 9-12<br />
DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 4/16-20/12<br />
NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />
STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 X STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />
1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />
ARTIST: TRACY JOHNSON<br />
CONTRACT #: A8811<br />
TITLE OF PROGRAM: DANCE PROJECT<br />
TYPE OF PROGRAM: RESIDENCY<br />
DISTRICT/ SCHOOL: MT.VERNON/MT. VERNON HIGH SCHOOL<br />
# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />
# OF STUDENTS: GRADE(S) 9-12<br />
DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 5/4-6/8/12<br />
NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />
STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 X STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />
1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />
1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />
2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />
3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />
4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />
5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />
6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />
7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />
OUR ENGLISH DEPT. STAFF WERE VERY IMPRESSED WITH THE<br />
MANNER IN WHICH TRACY INTEGRATED HER DANCE PROGRAM<br />
WITH THE ELA CONTENT.<br />
8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />
NONE<br />
9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />
NONE<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />
2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />
3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />
4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />
5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />
6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />
7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />
NONE<br />
8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />
NONE<br />
9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />
NONE<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
ARTIST: TROYE EVERS<br />
CONTRACT #: A8253<br />
TITLE OF PROGRAM: HAIR & MAKE-UP DESIGNER FOR THE SHOW -<br />
LYSISTRATA<br />
TYPE OF PROGRAM: RESIDENCY<br />
DISTRICT/ SCHOOL: CHAPPAQUA/HORACE GREELEY HIGH SCHOOL<br />
# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />
# OF STUDENTS: 20 GRADE(S) 9-12<br />
DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 1/17-19/12<br />
NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />
STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 X STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />
ARTIST: TROYE EVERS<br />
CONTRACT #: A8763<br />
TITLE OF PROGRAM: HAIR & MAKE-UP DESIGNER FOR THE SHOW - OUR<br />
TOWN<br />
TYPE OF PROGRAM: RESIDENCY<br />
DISTRICT/ SCHOOL: CHAPPAQUA/HORACE GREELEY HIGH SCHOOL<br />
# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />
# OF STUDENTS: 21 GRADE(S) 9-12<br />
DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 4/23-5/5/12<br />
NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />
STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 X STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />
1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />
1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />
1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />
2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />
3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />
4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />
5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />
6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />
2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />
3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />
4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />
5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />
6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />
TROYE IS A GIFTED DESIGNER AND WORKS WELL WITH THE<br />
STUDENTS.<br />
8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />
NONE<br />
9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />
NONE<br />
7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />
TROYE IS A GIFTED DESIGNER AND WORKS WELL WITH THE<br />
STUDENTS.<br />
8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />
NONE<br />
9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />
I LOOK FORWARD TO WORKING WITH HIM AGAIN.<br />
Arts in Education Service - School Evaluations <strong>2011</strong>-<strong>2012</strong><br />
Page 316 of 332
ARTIST: TROYE EVERS<br />
CONTRACT #: A8384<br />
TITLE OF PROGRAM: HAIR & MAKE-UP DESIGNER FOR THE SHOW - SIX<br />
DEGREES OF SEPARATION<br />
TYPE OF PROGRAM: RESIDENCY<br />
DISTRICT/ SCHOOL: CHAPPAQUA/HORACE GREELEY HIGH SCHOOL<br />
# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />
# OF STUDENTS: 19 GRADE(S) 9-12<br />
DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 2/27-3/12/12<br />
NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />
STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 X STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />
ARTIST: TROYE EVERS<br />
CONTRACT #: A7542<br />
TITLE OF PROGRAM: HAIR & MAKE-UP DESIGNER FOR THE SHOW - THE<br />
DROWSY CHAPERONE<br />
TYPE OF PROGRAM: RESIDENCY<br />
DISTRICT/ SCHOOL: CHAPPAQUA/HORACE GREELEY HIGH SCHOOL<br />
# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />
# OF STUDENTS: 27 GRADE(S) 9-12<br />
DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 11/11-19/11<br />
NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />
STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 X STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />
1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />
1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />
1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />
2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />
3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />
4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />
5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />
6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />
2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />
3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />
4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />
5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />
6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />
TROYE IS A GIFTED DESIGNER AND WORKS WELL WITH THE<br />
STUDENTS.<br />
8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />
NONE<br />
9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />
I LOOK FORWARDED TO WORKING WITH HIM AGAIN.<br />
7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM?<br />
TROYE IS A GIFTED DESIGNER.<br />
8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />
NONE<br />
9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />
I LOOK FORWARD TO WORKING WITH HIM AGAIN.<br />
Y<br />
WHY?<br />
ARTIST: TROYE EVERS<br />
CONTRACT #: A8557<br />
TITLE OF PROGRAM: HAIR & MAKE-UP DESIGNER FOR THE SHOW -<br />
XANADU<br />
TYPE OF PROGRAM: RESIDENCY<br />
DISTRICT/ SCHOOL: CHAPPAQUA/HORACE GREELEY HIGH SCHOOL<br />
# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />
# OF STUDENTS: 200 GRADE(S) 12<br />
DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 4/9-21/12<br />
NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />
STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 X STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />
1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />
1.<br />
2.<br />
3.<br />
4.<br />
5.<br />
6.<br />
STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />
ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />
EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />
ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />
TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />
QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />
IMPORTANT FOR STUDENTS TO SEE HOW ALL THE COMPONENTS<br />
OF A MUSICAL SHOW ARE DESIGNED, CREATED AND COME<br />
TOGETHER.<br />
8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />
NONE<br />
9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />
TROYE WAS FORTUNATE TO HAVE A FORMER STUDENT AND<br />
PARENT VOLUNTEERS WITH EXPERIENCE IN THE PROFESSION TO<br />
ASSIST HIM WITH HAIR AND MAKE UP EXECUTION.<br />
ARTIST: TWIN LAKES PRODUCTION, INC. CONTRACT #: A8220<br />
TITLE OF PROGRAM: JOHN ARRUCCI - PERCUSSION AROUND THE WORLD<br />
TYPE OF PROGRAM: WORKSHOP<br />
DISTRICT/ SCHOOL: CHAPPAQUA/SEVEN BRIDGES MIDDLE SCHOOL<br />
# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />
# OF STUDENTS: 40 GRADE(S) 8<br />
DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 6/1/12<br />
NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />
STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 X STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4 X<br />
1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />
1.<br />
2.<br />
3.<br />
4.<br />
5.<br />
6.<br />
STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />
ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />
EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />
ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />
TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />
QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />
JOHN WAS OUTSTANDING. IT WAS AMAZING WHAT HE COULD GET<br />
THE CHILDREN DOING IN SUCH A SHORT AMOUNT OF TIME.<br />
8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />
NONE<br />
9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />
ALSO AMAZING HOW HE LINKED PLAYING MUSIC WITH LIFE<br />
LESSONS, REALLY KNOWS HOW TO GET CHILDREN MOTIVATED.<br />
Arts in Education Service - School Evaluations <strong>2011</strong>-<strong>2012</strong><br />
Page 317 of 332
ARTIST: TWIN LAKES PRODUCTION, INC. CONTRACT #: A8420<br />
TITLE OF PROGRAM: JOHN ARRUCCI - PERCUSSION AROUND THE WORLD<br />
TYPE OF PROGRAM: ASSEMBLY<br />
DISTRICT/ SCHOOL: HENDRICK HUDSON/FURNACE WOODS ELEM.<br />
# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />
# OF STUDENTS: GRADE(S) K-5<br />
DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 2/8/12<br />
NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />
STANDARD 1 STANDARD 2 STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4 X<br />
ARTIST: TWIN LAKES PRODUCTION, INC. CONTRACT #: A7739A<br />
TITLE OF PROGRAM: JOHN ARRUCCI - PERCUSSION AROUND THE WORLD<br />
TYPE OF PROGRAM: ASSEMBLY<br />
DISTRICT/ SCHOOL: CHAPPAQUA/BELL MIDDLE SCHOOL<br />
# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />
# OF STUDENTS: 160 GRADE(S) 6<br />
DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 10/7/11<br />
NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />
STANDARD 1 STANDARD 2 STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4 X<br />
1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />
1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />
1.<br />
2.<br />
3.<br />
4.<br />
5.<br />
6.<br />
STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />
ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />
EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />
ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />
TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />
QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />
HE WAS INCREDIBLY KNOWLEDGEABLE ABOUT THE MATERIAL<br />
PRESENTED. HE WAS ENGAGING FOR ALL GRADES AND<br />
EXPLAINED THE HISTORICAL, CULTURAL AND MUSICAL ASPECTS<br />
OF THE PROGRAM IN AGE APPROPRIATE VOCABULARY.<br />
8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />
NONE<br />
9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />
HE IS EXTREMELY TALENTED AND IS A JOY TO HAVE IN THE<br />
CLASSROOM. ALL OF THE STUDENTS WERE ENGAGED AND<br />
INTERESTED. A FANTASTIC PRESENTATION.<br />
1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />
2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />
3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />
4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />
5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />
6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />
7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />
VERY WELL RECEIVED.<br />
8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />
NONE<br />
9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />
NONE<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
ARTIST: TWIN LAKES PRODUCTION, INC. CONTRACT #: A8507B<br />
TITLE OF PROGRAM: JOHN ARRUCCI - PERCUSSION AROUND THE WORLD<br />
TYPE OF PROGRAM: ASSEMBLY<br />
DISTRICT/ SCHOOL:<br />
# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />
OSSINING/PARK SCHOOL<br />
# OF STUDENTS: 650 GRADE(S) K<br />
DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 3/22/12<br />
NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />
STANDARD 1 STANDARD 2 STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4 X<br />
ARTIST: TWIN LAKES PRODUCTION, INC. CONTRACT #: A8507A<br />
TITLE OF PROGRAM: JOHN ARRUCCI - PERCUSSION AROUND THE WORLD<br />
TYPE OF PROGRAM: ASSEMBLY<br />
DISTRICT/ SCHOOL:<br />
# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />
OSSINING/ROOSEVELT<br />
# OF STUDENTS: 304 GRADE(S) 5<br />
DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 3/6/12<br />
NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />
STANDARD 1 STANDARD 2 STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4 X<br />
1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />
1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />
1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />
2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />
3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />
4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />
5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />
6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />
7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />
JOHN IS A FIRST RATE MUSICIAN AND AN EXCELLENT TEACHER.<br />
8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />
NONE<br />
9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />
ALTHOUGH OUR PROGRAM HAD TO BE ALTERED, JOHN'S GREAT<br />
FLEXIBILITY AND EASY SPIRIT MADE EVERYTHING WORK OUT<br />
WELL.<br />
4<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
4<br />
N/<br />
1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />
2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />
3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />
4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />
5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />
6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />
7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />
NONE<br />
8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />
NONE<br />
9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />
NONE<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
Arts in Education Service - School Evaluations <strong>2011</strong>-<strong>2012</strong><br />
Page 318 of 332
ARTIST: TWIN LAKES PRODUCTION, INC. CONTRACT #: A8103<br />
TITLE OF PROGRAM: JOHN ARRUCCI - PERCUSSION AROUND THE WORLD<br />
TYPE OF PROGRAM: ASSEMBLY<br />
DISTRICT/ SCHOOL:<br />
# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />
CARMEL/PATERSON ELEM.<br />
# OF STUDENTS: 600 GRADE(S) K-4<br />
DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 12/7/11<br />
NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />
STANDARD 1 STANDARD 2 STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4 X<br />
ARTIST: TWIN LAKES PRODUCTION, INC. CONTRACT #: A8420<br />
TITLE OF PROGRAM: JOHN ARRUCCI - PERCUSSION AROUND THE WORLD<br />
TYPE OF PROGRAM: ASSEMBLY<br />
DISTRICT/ SCHOOL: HENDRICK HUDSON/FURNACE WOODS ELEM.<br />
# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />
# OF STUDENTS: GRADE(S) K-5<br />
DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 2/8/12<br />
NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />
STANDARD 1 STANDARD 2 STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4 X<br />
1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />
1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />
1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />
2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />
3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />
4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />
5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />
6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
N/<br />
1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />
2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />
3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />
4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />
5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />
6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />
CHILDREN GET TO SEE RARE INSTRUMENTS FROM FOREIGN<br />
COUNTRIES.<br />
8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />
NONE<br />
9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />
JOHN IS AN AMAZING PERFORMER.<br />
7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />
HE WAS INCREDIBLY KNOWLEDGEABLE ABOUT THE MATERIAL<br />
PRESENTED. IT WAS ENGAGING FOR ALL GRADES.<br />
8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />
NONE<br />
9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />
HE IS EXTREMELY TALENTED AND IS A JOY TO HAVE IN THE<br />
CLASSROOM.<br />
ARTIST: TWIN LAKES PRODUCTION, INC. CONTRACT #: A8215<br />
TITLE OF PROGRAM: JOHN ARRUCCI - PERCUSSION AROUND THE WORLD<br />
TYPE OF PROGRAM: ASSEMBLY<br />
DISTRICT/ SCHOOL: HENDRICK HUDSON/FRANK G. LINDSEY ELEM.<br />
# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />
# OF STUDENTS: 420 GRADE(S) K-2<br />
DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 12/21/12<br />
NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />
STANDARD 1 STANDARD 2 STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4 X<br />
ARTIST: TWIN LAKES PRODUCTION, INC. CONTRACT #: A8233<br />
TITLE OF PROGRAM: JOHN ARRUCCI - PERCUSSION AROUND THE WORLD<br />
TYPE OF PROGRAM: ASSEMBLY/RESIDENCY<br />
DISTRICT/ SCHOOL:<br />
# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />
CARMEL/KENT ELEM. SCHOOL<br />
# OF STUDENTS: 200 GRADE(S) K-4<br />
DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 3/14-16/12<br />
NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />
STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 X STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4 X<br />
1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />
1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />
1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />
2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />
3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />
4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />
5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />
6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />
7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />
NONE<br />
8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />
NONE<br />
9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />
NONE<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
1.<br />
2.<br />
3.<br />
4.<br />
5.<br />
6.<br />
STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />
ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />
EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />
ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />
TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />
QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />
HIS PROGRAM INCORPORATED MANY AREAS OF THE CURRICULUM<br />
FROM THE SCIENCE OF SOUND TO THE EXPLORATION AND<br />
CONTRIBUTION OF MULTI CULTURAL MUSIC. JOHN CAPTURED THE<br />
CHILDREN'S ATTENTION AND TAUGHT THEM NEW SKILLS THAT<br />
THEY CAN USE IN THEIR MUSICAL STUDIES.<br />
8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />
NONE<br />
9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />
NONE<br />
Arts in Education Service - School Evaluations <strong>2011</strong>-<strong>2012</strong><br />
Page 319 of 332
ARTIST: UNDERCURRENT DESIGNS, INC. dba DA CONTRACT #: A8436<br />
TITLE OF PROGRAM: CLIFF MENDELSON - GREEK DESIGNS / POTTERS<br />
WHEEL<br />
TYPE OF PROGRAM: WORKSHOP<br />
DISTRICT/ SCHOOL: NEW ROCHELLE/NEW ROCHELLE HS<br />
# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />
# OF STUDENTS: GRADE(S) 9-12<br />
DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 3/15/12<br />
NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />
STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 X STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4 X<br />
1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />
ARTIST: UNDERCURRENT DESIGNS, INC. dba DA<br />
CONTRACT #: A8318<br />
TITLE OF PROGRAM: CLIFF MENDELSON - MASK MAKING<br />
TYPE OF PROGRAM: WORKSHOP<br />
DISTRICT/ SCHOOL: LAKELAND/THOMAS JEFFERSON ELEM.<br />
# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />
# OF STUDENTS: 76 GRADE(S) 5<br />
DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 3/5/12<br />
NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />
STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 X STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4 X<br />
1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />
1.<br />
2.<br />
3.<br />
4.<br />
5.<br />
6.<br />
STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />
ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />
EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />
ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />
TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />
QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />
CLIFF IS VERY ENTHUSIASTIC, CREATIVE, PROFESSIONAL ARTIST<br />
AND POTTER. HE WAS WELL PREPARED WITH WONDERFUL<br />
VISUALS AND HISTORIC EXAMPLES OF GREEK VASES.<br />
8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />
NONE<br />
9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />
CLIFF IS A COMPLETE PLEASURE AND I WOULD HIGHLY<br />
RECOMMENT HIM.<br />
1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />
2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />
3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />
4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />
5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />
6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />
7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />
THE STUDENTS WER ACTIVELY ENGAGED AND WERE ABLE TO<br />
EXPRESS THEMSELVES THROUGH THEIR ART.<br />
8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />
NONE<br />
9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />
NONE<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
ARTIST: UNDERCURRENT DESIGNS, INC. dba DA<br />
CONTRACT #: A7650<br />
TITLE OF PROGRAM: CLIFF MENDELSON - TILE WORKSHOPS<br />
TYPE OF PROGRAM: RESIDENCY<br />
DISTRICT/ SCHOOL: NEW ROCHELLE/JEFFERSON ELEM.<br />
# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />
# OF STUDENTS: 98 GRADE(S) 5<br />
DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 1/5-6/12<br />
NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />
STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 X STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4 X<br />
ARTIST: UP AGAINST THE WALL PRODUCTIONS CONTRACT #: A7916<br />
TITLE OF PROGRAM: INTO TO FILM PRODUCTION<br />
TYPE OF PROGRAM: RESIDENCY<br />
DISTRICT/ SCHOOL: NEW ROCHELLE/JEFFERSON ELEM.<br />
# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />
# OF STUDENTS: 25 GRADE(S) 2-4<br />
DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 11/5/11-2/12/12<br />
NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />
STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 X STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />
1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />
1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />
1.<br />
2.<br />
3.<br />
4.<br />
5.<br />
6.<br />
STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />
ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />
EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />
ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />
TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />
QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />
CLIFF IS BEYOND FANTASTIC. HE COMES TO JEFFERSON EVERY<br />
YEAR AND IS PROFESSIONAL AND UNBELIEVEABLY GREAT WITH<br />
STUDENTS.<br />
8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />
NONE<br />
9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />
HE KNOWS HIS ART TOO.<br />
1.<br />
2.<br />
3.<br />
4.<br />
5.<br />
6.<br />
STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />
ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />
EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />
ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />
TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />
QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />
CHAZZ REALLY KNOWS THE CRAFT OF FILM MAKING AND IS ABLE<br />
TO GET STUDENTS TO CREATE GREAT PRODUCTIONS THAT THEY<br />
HAVE WRITTEN AND PRODUCED.<br />
8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />
NONE<br />
9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />
NONE<br />
Arts in Education Service - School Evaluations <strong>2011</strong>-<strong>2012</strong><br />
Page 320 of 332
ARTIST: VANESSA NASTRI<br />
CONTRACT #: A8313<br />
TITLE OF PROGRAM: CHOREOGRAPHER<br />
TYPE OF PROGRAM: RESIDENCY<br />
DISTRICT/ SCHOOL:<br />
# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />
TUCKAHOE/W. E. COTTLE ELEM.<br />
# OF STUDENTS: 11 GRADE(S) 4 & 5<br />
DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 2/2-6/14/12<br />
NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />
STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 X STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />
1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />
ARTIST: VERONICA MITTENZWEI<br />
CONTRACT #: A8714<br />
TITLE OF PROGRAM: DIRECTOR & CHOREOGRAPHER FOR - BULLIES<br />
ANONYMOUS<br />
TYPE OF PROGRAM: RESIDENCY<br />
DISTRICT/ SCHOOL: WHITE PLAINS/MAMARONECK AVENUE ELEM. ELEM.<br />
# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />
# OF STUDENTS: 75 GRADE(S) K-5<br />
DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 6/7 & 8/12<br />
NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />
STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 X STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />
1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />
1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />
2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />
3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />
4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />
5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />
6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />
7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />
NONE<br />
8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />
NONE<br />
9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />
GREAT SHOW.<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
4<br />
4<br />
1.<br />
2.<br />
3.<br />
4.<br />
5.<br />
6.<br />
STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />
ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />
EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />
ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />
TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />
QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />
VERONICA WROTE AN INCREDIBLE SCRIPT FOR OUR STUDENTS. IT<br />
WAS INFORMATIVE, CLEVER, PERTINENT AND HUMOROUS. SHE<br />
PUTS ON INCREDIBLE PRODUCTIONS THAT WE ALL GET TO<br />
PARTICIPATE IN.<br />
8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />
NONE<br />
9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />
IT IS THE HIGHLIGHT OF OUR YEAR. SHE BRINGS ELEMENTARY<br />
STUDENTS TO A PROFESSIONAL LEVEL.<br />
ARTIST: VINCENT DAVIS<br />
CONTRACT #: A7550<br />
TITLE OF PROGRAM: CARTOONING<br />
TYPE OF PROGRAM: WORKSHOP<br />
DISTRICT/ SCHOOL: KATONAH/LEWISBORO/KATONAH ELEM. SCHOOL<br />
# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />
# OF STUDENTS: GRADE(S) 2-4<br />
DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 9/26-11/21/11<br />
NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />
STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 X STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />
ARTIST: VINCENT DAVIS<br />
CONTRACT #: A8610<br />
TITLE OF PROGRAM: CARTOONING<br />
TYPE OF PROGRAM: WORKSHOP<br />
DISTRICT/ SCHOOL: EASTCHESTER/GREENVALE ELEM.<br />
# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />
# OF STUDENTS: 7 GRADE(S) 3-5<br />
DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 3/22-5/1/12<br />
NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />
STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 X STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />
1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />
1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />
1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />
2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />
3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />
4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />
5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />
6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />
3<br />
3<br />
3<br />
3<br />
3<br />
3<br />
1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />
2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />
3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />
4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />
5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />
6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
N/<br />
7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />
CHILDREN ENJOYED WORKING WITH THE ARTIST. WELL DONE.<br />
7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM?<br />
GREAT PROGRAM. VERY PROFESSIONAL.<br />
Y<br />
WHY?<br />
8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />
NONE<br />
9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />
NONE<br />
8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />
NONE<br />
9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />
NONE<br />
Arts in Education Service - School Evaluations <strong>2011</strong>-<strong>2012</strong><br />
Page 321 of 332
ARTIST: VINCENT DAVIS<br />
CONTRACT #: A7665<br />
TITLE OF PROGRAM: CARTOONING<br />
TYPE OF PROGRAM: WORKSHOP<br />
DISTRICT/ SCHOOL: EASTCHESTER/GREENVALE ELEM.<br />
# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />
# OF STUDENTS: 11 GRADE(S) 3-5<br />
DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 10/20-12/15/11<br />
NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />
STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 X STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />
ARTIST: VINCENT DAVIS<br />
CONTRACT #: A8229<br />
TITLE OF PROGRAM: CARTOONING<br />
TYPE OF PROGRAM: WORKSHOP<br />
DISTRICT/ SCHOOL: KATONAH/LEWISBORO/INCREASE MILLER ELEM.<br />
# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />
# OF STUDENTS: 7 GRADE(S) 1-5<br />
DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 1/19-3/15/12<br />
NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />
STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 X STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />
1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />
1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />
1.<br />
2.<br />
3.<br />
4.<br />
5.<br />
6.<br />
STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />
ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />
EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />
ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />
TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />
QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
N/<br />
7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />
VINCENT WAS A WONDERFUL ADDITION TO OUR PROGRAM. THE<br />
STUDENTS REALLY ENJOYED HIS CLASS.<br />
8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />
NONE<br />
9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />
NONE<br />
1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />
2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />
3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />
4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />
5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />
6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />
7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />
NONE<br />
8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />
NONE<br />
9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />
NONE<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
N/<br />
N/<br />
ARTIST: VINCENT DAVIS<br />
CONTRACT #: A8690<br />
TITLE OF PROGRAM: DRAWING<br />
TYPE OF PROGRAM: WORKSHOP<br />
DISTRICT/ SCHOOL: KATONAH/LEWISBORO/KATONAH ELEM. SCHOOL<br />
# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />
# OF STUDENTS: 8 GRADE(S) 1 & 2<br />
DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 4/9-6/4/12<br />
NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />
STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 X STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />
1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />
ARTIST: WALTER BARRETT<br />
CONTRACT #: A8650<br />
TITLE OF PROGRAM: TROMBONE PLAYER FOR THE SHOW - A FUNNY<br />
THING HAPPENED ON THE WAY TO THE FORUM<br />
TYPE OF PROGRAM: ASSEMBLY<br />
DISTRICT/ SCHOOL: PUTNAM VALLEY/PUTNAM VALLEY HIGH SCHOOL<br />
# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />
# OF STUDENTS: 400 GRADE(S) 9-12<br />
DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 4/13-23/12<br />
NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />
STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />
1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />
1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />
2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />
3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />
4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />
5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />
6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />
7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />
NONE<br />
8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />
NONE<br />
9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />
NONE<br />
4<br />
4<br />
4<br />
4<br />
4<br />
4<br />
1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />
2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />
3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />
4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />
5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />
6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />
7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />
NONE<br />
8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />
NONE<br />
9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />
NONE<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
Arts in Education Service - School Evaluations <strong>2011</strong>-<strong>2012</strong><br />
Page 322 of 332
ARTIST: WALTER BARRETT<br />
CONTRACT #: A7718<br />
TITLE OF PROGRAM: TROMBONE PLAYER FOR THE SHOW - ANNIE GET<br />
YOUR GUN<br />
TYPE OF PROGRAM: ASSEMBLY<br />
DISTRICT/ SCHOOL: LAKELAND/WALTER PANAS HIGH SCHOOL<br />
# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />
# OF STUDENTS: 100 GRADE(S) 9-12<br />
DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 11/14-19/11<br />
NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />
STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />
1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />
ARTIST: WALTER BARRETT<br />
CONTRACT #: A8063<br />
TITLE OF PROGRAM: TROMBONE PLAYER FOR THE SHOW - BARNUM<br />
TYPE OF PROGRAM: ASSEMBLY<br />
DISTRICT/ SCHOOL: NORTH SALEM/NORTH SALEM MIDDLE & HIGH SCHOO<br />
# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />
# OF STUDENTS: 200 GRADE(S) 6-12<br />
DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 2/4-12/12<br />
NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />
STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />
1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />
1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />
2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />
3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />
4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />
5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />
6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />
7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />
GREAT WORKING WITH WALTER.<br />
8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />
NONE<br />
9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />
NONE<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
1.<br />
2.<br />
3.<br />
4.<br />
5.<br />
6.<br />
STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />
ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />
EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />
ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />
TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />
QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />
MR. BARRETT IS A FINE MUSICAN AND AN INSPIRATION TO YOUNG<br />
MUSICIANS.<br />
8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />
NONE<br />
9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />
NONE<br />
ARTIST: WALTER BARRETT<br />
CONTRACT #: A8335<br />
TITLE OF PROGRAM: TUBA PLAYER FOR THE SHOW - MY FAIR LADY<br />
TYPE OF PROGRAM: ASSEMBLY<br />
DISTRICT/ SCHOOL: LAKELAND/WALTER PANAS HIGH SCHOOL<br />
# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />
# OF STUDENTS: 200 GRADE(S) 9-12<br />
DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 4/30-5/5/12<br />
NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />
STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />
ARTIST: WENDY H. GROSS dba WENDY GROSS CONTRACT #: A8751<br />
TITLE OF PROGRAM: YOUNG PLAYWRIGHTS<br />
TYPE OF PROGRAM: RESIDENCY<br />
DISTRICT/ SCHOOL: WHITE PLAINS/EASTCHESTER HIGH SCHOOL<br />
# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />
# OF STUDENTS: 150 GRADE(S) 6<br />
DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 5/24-25/12<br />
NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />
STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 X STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />
1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />
1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />
1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />
2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />
3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />
4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />
5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />
6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />
7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />
NONE<br />
8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />
NONE<br />
9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />
NONE<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
1.<br />
2.<br />
3.<br />
4.<br />
5.<br />
6.<br />
STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />
ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />
EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />
ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />
TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />
QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />
THE STUDENTS SPENT TIME ON INTENSE CRITICAL THINKING AND<br />
WRITING OF A PLAY, AND THEY LOVED IT.<br />
8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />
NONE<br />
9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />
NONE<br />
Arts in Education Service - School Evaluations <strong>2011</strong>-<strong>2012</strong><br />
Page 323 of 332
ARTIST: WESTCHESTER MIXED MARTIAL ARTS CONTRACT #: A8292<br />
TITLE OF PROGRAM: ALLISON SCHLECK - ART OF KARATE & MOVEMENT<br />
TYPE OF PROGRAM: WORKSHOP<br />
DISTRICT/ SCHOOL: KATONAH/LEWISBORO/KATONAH ELEM. SCHOOL<br />
# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />
# OF STUDENTS: 9 GRADE(S) K-4<br />
DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 1/19-3/15/12<br />
NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />
STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 X STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4 X<br />
ARTIST: WESTCHESTER MIXED MARTIAL ARTS CONTRACT #: A7560<br />
TITLE OF PROGRAM: BRANDON DURHAM - ART & MOVEMENT OF KARATE<br />
TYPE OF PROGRAM: WORKSHOP<br />
DISTRICT/ SCHOOL: KATONAH/LEWISBORO/KATONAH ELEM. SCHOOL<br />
# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />
# OF STUDENTS: 8 GRADE(S) K-2<br />
DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 9/30-12/9/11<br />
NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />
STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 X STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4 X<br />
1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />
1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />
1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />
2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />
3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />
4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />
5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />
6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />
4<br />
4<br />
4<br />
4<br />
4<br />
4<br />
1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />
2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />
3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />
4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />
5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />
6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />
4<br />
4<br />
4<br />
4<br />
4<br />
4<br />
7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM?<br />
STUDENTS ALWAYS ENJOY THIS PROGRAM.<br />
Y<br />
WHY?<br />
7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />
IT IS A WELL RUN PROGRAM AND OUR STUDENTS LIKED IT.<br />
8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />
NONE<br />
9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />
NONE<br />
8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />
NONE<br />
9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />
NONE<br />
ARTIST: WESTCHESTER PHILHARMONIC CONTRACT #: A8639<br />
TITLE OF PROGRAM: PHILHARMONIC ALIVE<br />
TYPE OF PROGRAM: WORKSHOP<br />
DISTRICT/ SCHOOL:<br />
# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />
TARRYTOWN/W. L. MORSE ELEM.<br />
# OF STUDENTS: 600 GRADE(S) K-2<br />
DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 3/5, 26 & 5/1/12<br />
NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />
STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />
ARTIST: WI-FI HIGH PRODUCTIONS, LLC CONTRACT #: A8454<br />
TITLE OF PROGRAM: MATT FRANZETTI - VIRTUALLY ME!<br />
TYPE OF PROGRAM: ASSEMBLY<br />
DISTRICT/ SCHOOL: NORTH SALEM/NORTH SALEM MIDDLE SCHOOL<br />
# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />
# OF STUDENTS: 300 GRADE(S) 6-8<br />
DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 2/15/12<br />
NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />
STANDARD 1 STANDARD 2 STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />
1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />
1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />
1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />
2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />
3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />
4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />
5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />
6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />
2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />
3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />
4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />
5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />
6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />
4<br />
4<br />
4<br />
4<br />
4<br />
4<br />
7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM?<br />
NONE<br />
Y<br />
WHY?<br />
7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />
THIS IS A GOOD MEANINGFUL SHOW FOR THE MIDDLE GRADES.<br />
8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />
NONE<br />
9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />
EXCELLENT.<br />
8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />
NONE<br />
9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />
NONE<br />
Arts in Education Service - School Evaluations <strong>2011</strong>-<strong>2012</strong><br />
Page 324 of 332
ARTIST: WILLIAM BROWN<br />
CONTRACT #: A8161<br />
TITLE OF PROGRAM: SET DESIGNER CONSTRUCTION FOR THE SHOW -<br />
BEAUTY AND THE BEAST<br />
TYPE OF PROGRAM: RESIDENCY<br />
DISTRICT/ SCHOOL: PLEASANTVILLE/PLEASANTVILLE HIGH SCHOOL<br />
# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />
# OF STUDENTS: 1000 GRADE(S) 9-12<br />
DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 1/3-3/20/12<br />
NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />
STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 X STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />
ARTIST: WILLIAM BUMBOLOW<br />
CONTRACT #: A7705<br />
TITLE OF PROGRAM: LIGHTING DESIGNER FOR THE FALL MUSICAL - ANNIE<br />
GET YOUR GUN<br />
TYPE OF PROGRAM: RESIDENCY<br />
DISTRICT/ SCHOOL: LAKELAND/WALTER PANAS HIGH SCHOOL<br />
# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />
# OF STUDENTS: 100 GRADE(S) 9-12<br />
DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 10/17-11/19/11<br />
NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />
STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 X STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />
1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />
1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />
1.<br />
2.<br />
3.<br />
4.<br />
5.<br />
6.<br />
STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />
ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />
EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />
ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />
TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />
QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
N/<br />
7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />
BILL TEACHES SET BUILDING TO A LARGE CREW OF STUDENTS. HE<br />
TEACHES LEADERSHIP.<br />
8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />
NONE<br />
9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />
IT WAS WONDERFUL TO HAVE THE STUDENTS LEARN BUILDING<br />
SKILLS AND THE USE OF TOOLS AND SKILLS THEY WILL HAVE AS<br />
THEY LEAVE HIGH SCHOOL.<br />
1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />
2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />
3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />
4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />
5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />
6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />
7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />
NONE<br />
8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />
NONE<br />
9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />
NONE<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
ARTIST: WILLIAM BUMBOLOW<br />
CONTRACT #: A8322<br />
TITLE OF PROGRAM: LIGHTING DESIGNER FOR THE SPRING MUSICAL - MY<br />
FAIR LADY<br />
TYPE OF PROGRAM: RESIDENCY<br />
DISTRICT/ SCHOOL: LAKELAND/WALTER PANAS HIGH SCHOOL<br />
# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />
# OF STUDENTS: 200 GRADE(S) 9-12<br />
DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 3/5-5/5/12<br />
NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />
STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 X STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />
ARTIST: WILLIAM CONWAY<br />
CONTRACT #: A8532<br />
TITLE OF PROGRAM: BASS PLAYER FOR THE SHOW - ONCE UPON A<br />
MATTRESS<br />
TYPE OF PROGRAM: ASSEMBLY<br />
DISTRICT/ SCHOOL:<br />
# OF TEACHERS: 2<br />
SOMERS/SOMERS HIGH SCHOOL<br />
# OF STUDENTS: 50 GRADE(S) 9-12<br />
DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 3/12-18/12<br />
NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />
STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />
1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />
1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />
1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />
2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />
3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />
4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />
5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />
6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />
2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />
3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />
4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />
5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />
6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM?<br />
NONE<br />
Y<br />
WHY?<br />
7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM?<br />
NONE<br />
Y<br />
WHY?<br />
8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />
NONE<br />
9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />
NONE<br />
8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />
NONE<br />
9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />
NONE<br />
Arts in Education Service - School Evaluations <strong>2011</strong>-<strong>2012</strong><br />
Page 325 of 332
ARTIST:<br />
WINGSPAN ARTS, INC.<br />
CONTRACT #: A7784<br />
TITLE OF PROGRAM: ANNE MCALEXANDER WISE, ALEX WISE & DEVAN<br />
HIBBARD WORK WITH STUDENTS TO PERFORM THE<br />
SHOW - HONK<br />
TYPE OF PROGRAM: RESIDENCY<br />
DISTRICT/ SCHOOL:<br />
NEW ROCHELLE/TRINITY ELEM. SCHOOL<br />
# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />
# OF STUDENTS: 36 GRADE(S) 4 & 5<br />
DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE<br />
12/2/11-2/3/12<br />
NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />
STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 X STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />
ARTIST: YALE ALLEY CATS<br />
CONTRACT #: A8824<br />
TITLE OF PROGRAM: A CAPPELLA GROUP<br />
TYPE OF PROGRAM: ASSEMBLY<br />
DISTRICT/ SCHOOL: KATONAH/LEWISBORO/JOHN JAY HIGH SCHOOL<br />
# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />
# OF STUDENTS: 258 GRADE(S) 9-12<br />
DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 4/25/12<br />
NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />
STANDARD 1 STANDARD 2 STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4 X<br />
1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />
1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />
1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />
2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />
3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />
4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />
5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />
6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />
7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />
EXCELLENT PROFESSIONAL JOB.<br />
8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />
NONE<br />
9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />
NONE<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />
2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />
3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />
4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />
5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />
6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />
7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />
GREAT GROUP. GOOD INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS.<br />
8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />
NONE<br />
9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />
NONE<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
ARTIST: YALE ALLEY CATS<br />
CONTRACT #: A8813<br />
TITLE OF PROGRAM: A CAPPELLA GROUP<br />
TYPE OF PROGRAM: ASSEMBLY<br />
DISTRICT/ SCHOOL: KATONAH/LEWISBORO/INCREASE MILLER ELEM.<br />
# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />
# OF STUDENTS: GRADE(S) K-5<br />
DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 4/23/12<br />
NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />
STANDARD 1 STANDARD 2 STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4 X<br />
ARTIST: YES, YOU CAN!, INC.<br />
CONTRACT #: A7769<br />
TITLE OF PROGRAM: LLOYD BACHRACH - MOTIVATIONAL SHOW<br />
TYPE OF PROGRAM: ASSEMBLY<br />
DISTRICT/ SCHOOL:<br />
# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />
MTP/WESTLAKE MIDDLE SCHOOL<br />
# OF STUDENTS: 330 GRADE(S) 7 & 8<br />
DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 11/3/11<br />
NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />
STANDARD 1 STANDARD 2 STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />
1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />
1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />
1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />
2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />
3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />
4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />
5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />
6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />
7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />
THEY WERE ENTHUSIASTIC, ENERGETIC AND OF COURSE<br />
TALENTED. THEY HELD THE STUDENTS' INTEREST WITH THE<br />
UNIQUENESS AND VARIETY EVIDENT IN THEIR PROGRAM.<br />
8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />
NONE<br />
9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />
NONE<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
N/<br />
1.<br />
2.<br />
3.<br />
4.<br />
5.<br />
6.<br />
STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />
ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />
EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />
ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />
TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />
QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />
LLOYD WAS A WONDERFULLY ENGAGING AND MOTIVATIONAL<br />
SPEAKER/STORYTELLER. STUDENTS WERE HIGHLY IMPRESSED AS<br />
WERE THE TEACHERS.<br />
8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />
NONE<br />
9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />
NONE<br />
Arts in Education Service - School Evaluations <strong>2011</strong>-<strong>2012</strong><br />
Page 326 of 332
ARTIST: YORKTOWN THEATRE COMPANY CONTRACT #: A8494<br />
TITLE OF PROGRAM: GINA NOTO CHOREOGRAPHER & STEVE LOFTUS SET<br />
DESIGNER FOR THE SHOW - ANNIE JR.<br />
TYPE OF PROGRAM: RESIDENCY<br />
DISTRICT/ SCHOOL: CHAPPAQUA/WESTORCHARD ELEM.<br />
# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />
# OF STUDENTS: 1015 GRADE(S) 2-4<br />
DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 4/16-29/12<br />
NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />
STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 X STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />
1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />
ARTIST: YORKTOWN THEATRE COMPANY CONTRACT #: A8678<br />
TITLE OF PROGRAM: REBECCA STERN CHOREOGRAPHER, STEVE<br />
LOFTUS & BILL BROWN - SET DESIGNERS FOR THE<br />
SHOW - PETER PAN<br />
TYPE OF PROGRAM: RESIDENCY<br />
DISTRICT/ SCHOOL:<br />
CHAPPAQUA/ROARING BROOK ELEM.<br />
# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />
# OF STUDENTS: 113 GRADE(S) 2-4<br />
DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 5/21-6/3/12<br />
NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />
STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 X STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />
1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />
1.<br />
2.<br />
3.<br />
4.<br />
5.<br />
6.<br />
STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />
ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />
EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />
ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />
TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />
QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
N/<br />
7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />
THE STUDENTS LOVED THE DANCE, COSTUMES, AND SETS WHICH<br />
WERE ESPECIALLY EXCITING FOR THE STUDENTS. THE ENTIRE<br />
PROGRAM WAS FABULOUS.<br />
8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />
NONE<br />
9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />
NONE<br />
1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />
2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />
3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />
4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />
5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />
6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />
7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />
WONDERFUL SHOW AND GREAT EXPERIENCE FOR ALL CAST<br />
MEMEBERS.<br />
8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />
NONE<br />
9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />
NONE<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
ARTIST: YORKTOWN THEATRE COMPANY CONTRACT #: A8120<br />
TITLE OF PROGRAM: STEVEN LOFTUS - SET DESIGNER & JOHN FANELLI -<br />
COSTUME DESIGNER FOR SHOW - SEUSSICAL<br />
TYPE OF PROGRAM: RESIDENCY<br />
DISTRICT/ SCHOOL: CHAPPAQUA/SEVEN BRIDGES MIDDLE SCHOOL<br />
# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />
# OF STUDENTS: 103 GRADE(S) 5-8<br />
DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 1/30-2/12/12<br />
NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />
STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 X STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />
ARTIST: YORKTOWN THEATRE COMPANY CONTRACT #: A8127<br />
TITLE OF PROGRAM: SUSAN ZIPPERMAN - COSTUMES & STEVE LOFTUS -<br />
SET DESIGNER FOR THE SHOW - FOOTLOOSE<br />
TYPE OF PROGRAM: RESIDENCY<br />
DISTRICT/ SCHOOL: CHAPPAQUA/BELL MIDDLE SCHOOL<br />
# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />
# OF STUDENTS: GRADE(S) 5-8<br />
DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 3/5-25/12<br />
NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />
STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 X STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />
1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />
1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />
1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />
2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />
3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />
4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />
5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />
6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />
7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />
UTILIZING AND OPERATING HIGH CALIBER SETS AND COSTUMES<br />
GAVE STUDENTS A REAL SENSE OF ACCOMPLISHMENT.<br />
8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />
NONE<br />
9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />
NONE<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />
2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />
3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />
4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />
5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />
6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />
7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />
IT IS AN AMAZING PROGRAM.<br />
8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />
NONE<br />
9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />
NONE<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
N/<br />
Arts in Education Service - School Evaluations <strong>2011</strong>-<strong>2012</strong><br />
Page 327 of 332
ARTIST: YOUNG AT ARTS<br />
CONTRACT #: A7700<br />
TITLE OF PROGRAM: SHARYL PIRTLE & VAUGHN MAUREN - MUSICAL<br />
THEATRE<br />
TYPE OF PROGRAM: WORKSHOP<br />
DISTRICT/ SCHOOL: EASTCHESTER/ANNE HUTCHINSON ELEM.<br />
# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />
# OF STUDENTS: GRADE(S) 3-5<br />
DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 10/6-12/16/12<br />
NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />
STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 X STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />
1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />
ARTIST: YOUNG AT ARTS<br />
CONTRACT #: A8460<br />
TITLE OF PROGRAM: SHARYN PIRTLE - DIRECTOR<br />
TYPE OF PROGRAM: ASSEMBLY/WORKSHOP<br />
DISTRICT/ SCHOOL: EASTCHESTER/ANNE HUTCHINSON ELEM.<br />
# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />
# OF STUDENTS: 350 GRADE(S) 3-5<br />
DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 2/2-5/19/12<br />
NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />
STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />
1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />
1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />
2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />
3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />
4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />
5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />
6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />
7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />
SHE WAS VERY KNOWLEDGEABLE AND INTERACTIVE WITH THE<br />
STUDENTS.<br />
8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />
NONE<br />
9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />
NONE<br />
5<br />
5<br />
4<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />
2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />
3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />
4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />
5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />
6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />
7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />
THEY WERE VERY PROFESSIONAL. THE STUDENTS LEARNED A<br />
LOT. THEY SANG, DANCED, ACTED AND DID SEVERAL<br />
PERFORMANCES.<br />
8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />
NONE<br />
9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />
THE STUDENTS WERE VERY INVOLVED MOST OF THE TIME AND THE<br />
INTERACTION WAS GREAT.<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
ARTIST: YOUNG AUDIENCES OF CONNECTICUT CONTRACT #: A7866<br />
TITLE OF PROGRAM: SORO BINDI - AFRICAN DANCER<br />
TYPE OF PROGRAM: ASSEMBLY<br />
DISTRICT/ SCHOOL:<br />
# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />
WHITE PLAINS/POST ROAD ELEM.<br />
# OF STUDENTS: 22 GRADE(S) K-5<br />
DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 10/21/11<br />
NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />
STANDARD 1 STANDARD 2 STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4 X<br />
ARTIST: YOUNG AUDIENCES OF NEW JERSEY CONTRACT #: A7813<br />
TITLE OF PROGRAM: MARK LOHR - HOOKED ON BOOKS<br />
TYPE OF PROGRAM: ASSEMBLY<br />
DISTRICT/ SCHOOL: CHAPPAQUA/WESTORCHARD ELEM.<br />
# OF TEACHERS: 5<br />
# OF STUDENTS: 515 GRADE(S) K-4<br />
DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 6/12/12<br />
NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />
STANDARD 1 STANDARD 2 STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />
1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />
1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />
1.<br />
2.<br />
3.<br />
4.<br />
5.<br />
6.<br />
STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />
ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />
EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />
ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />
TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />
QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
N/<br />
7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />
THIS WAS AN INTERACTIVE MUSICAL, RHYTHM PERFORMANCE. HE<br />
INVOLVED STUDENTS AND CAPTURED STUDENT ATTENTION.<br />
8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />
NONE<br />
9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />
VERY IMPRESSIVE.<br />
1.<br />
2.<br />
3.<br />
4.<br />
5.<br />
6.<br />
STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />
ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />
EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />
ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />
TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />
QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />
4<br />
5<br />
4<br />
5<br />
4<br />
N/<br />
7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />
IT WAS FABULOUS. VERY ENGAGING YET THE STUDENTS CLEARLY<br />
GOT THE MESSAGE OF THE SHOW.<br />
8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />
NONE<br />
9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />
LOVED IT - GREAT SHOW.<br />
Arts in Education Service - School Evaluations <strong>2011</strong>-<strong>2012</strong><br />
Page 328 of 332
ARTIST: YOUNG AUDIENCES OF NEW YORK CONTRACT #: A8002C<br />
TITLE OF PROGRAM: FERABA - AFRICAN RHYTHM TAP<br />
TYPE OF PROGRAM: ASSEMBLY<br />
DISTRICT/ SCHOOL: NEW ROCHELLE/ISAAC YOUNG MIDDLE SCHOOL<br />
# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />
# OF STUDENTS: GRADE(S) 7<br />
DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 2/15/12<br />
NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />
STANDARD 1 STANDARD 2 STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4 X<br />
ARTIST: YOUNG AUDIENCES OF NEW YORK CONTRACT #: A8002B<br />
TITLE OF PROGRAM: KLEZMERFEST SHOW<br />
TYPE OF PROGRAM: ASSEMBLY<br />
DISTRICT/ SCHOOL: NEW ROCHELLE/ISAAC YOUNG MIDDLE SCHOOL<br />
# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />
# OF STUDENTS: 250 GRADE(S) 6<br />
DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 1/20/12<br />
NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />
STANDARD 1 STANDARD 2 STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4 X<br />
1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />
1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />
1.<br />
2.<br />
3.<br />
4.<br />
5.<br />
6.<br />
STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />
ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />
EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />
ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />
TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />
QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />
ALWAYS A GREAT EXPERIENCE FOR THE STUDENTS. THE ARTISTS<br />
ARE ALWAYS SO WELL PREPARED.<br />
8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />
NONE<br />
9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />
GREAT PROGRAM. THE STUDENTS LOVED IT.<br />
1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />
2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />
3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />
4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />
5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />
6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />
7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />
IT WAS GREAT!<br />
8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />
NONE<br />
9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />
GREAT PROGRAM. THE STUDENTS LOVED IT.<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
ARTIST: YOUNG AUDIENCES OF NEW YORK CONTRACT #: A7818<br />
TITLE OF PROGRAM: ROOTS OF SALSA<br />
TYPE OF PROGRAM: ASSEMBLY<br />
DISTRICT/ SCHOOL: NEW ROCHELLE/WARD ELEM. SCHOOL<br />
# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />
# OF STUDENTS: 100 GRADE(S) K-5<br />
DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 10/14/11<br />
NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />
STANDARD 1 STANDARD 2 STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4 X<br />
ARTIST: YOUNG AUDIENCES OF NEW YORK CONTRACT #: A8002A<br />
TITLE OF PROGRAM: SLAM 101: VERBAL COMBAT / POETRY SLAM<br />
TYPE OF PROGRAM: ASSEMBLY<br />
DISTRICT/ SCHOOL: NEW ROCHELLE/ISAAC YOUNG MIDDLE SCHOOL<br />
# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />
# OF STUDENTS: 250 GRADE(S) 8<br />
DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 11/30/11<br />
NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />
STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />
1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />
1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />
1.<br />
2.<br />
3.<br />
4.<br />
5.<br />
6.<br />
STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />
ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />
EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />
ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />
TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />
QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />
2<br />
1<br />
1<br />
1<br />
4<br />
N/<br />
7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? N WHY?<br />
ROOTS OF SALSA WAS NOT AT ALL WHAT WE EXPECTED. WE<br />
EXPECTED AN ENERGETIC DISPLAY OF SALSA WITH AN AGE<br />
APPROPRIATE EXPLANATION OF THE ROOTS. LESS SPEAKING AND<br />
MORE DEMONSTRATION. BETTER CONTROL OF THE<br />
PERFORMANCE.<br />
8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />
NONE<br />
9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />
DURING OUR SHOW, THE PERFORMERS LOST THE ATTENTION OF<br />
OUR LITTLE ONES. UNFORTUNATELY THEY SNAPPED AT THE<br />
CHILDREN. THIS WAS UNACCEPTABLE. THEY INVITED ALL OF THE<br />
CHILDREN ON STAGE CAUSING AN UNSAFE CONDITION.<br />
1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />
2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />
3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />
4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />
5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />
6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />
7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />
NONE<br />
8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />
NONE<br />
9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />
GREAT PROGRAM.<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
Arts in Education Service - School Evaluations <strong>2011</strong>-<strong>2012</strong><br />
Page 329 of 332
ARTIST: YOUTH TO YOUTH INTERNATIONAL CONTRACT #: A7942<br />
TITLE OF PROGRAM: SHAUN DERIK - DREAMSONG<br />
TYPE OF PROGRAM: ASSEMBLY<br />
DISTRICT/ SCHOOL: KATONAH/LEWISBORO/JOHN JAY MIDDLE & HIGH SCH<br />
# OF TEACHERS: 5<br />
# OF STUDENTS: 100 GRADE(S) 6-12<br />
DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 11/9/11<br />
NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />
STANDARD 1 STANDARD 2 STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />
ARTIST: YVETTE RUGASAGUHUNGA<br />
CONTRACT #: A7808<br />
TITLE OF PROGRAM: LESSONS OF THE PAST, HOPE FOR THE FUTURE<br />
TYPE OF PROGRAM: ASSEMBLY<br />
DISTRICT/ SCHOOL: CHAPPAQUA/BELL MIDDLE SCHOOL<br />
# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />
# OF STUDENTS: 170 GRADE(S) 8<br />
DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 2/16/12<br />
NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />
STANDARD 1 STANDARD 2 STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />
1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />
1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />
1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />
2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />
3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />
4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />
5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />
6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />
7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />
NONE<br />
8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />
IT WOULD HAVE BEEN HELPFUL IF WE HAD KNOWN WHAT SOUND<br />
EQUIPMENT AND INSTRUMENTS, ETC. HE NEEDED AT LEAST 2<br />
WEEKS PRIOR TO THE SHOW. WE WOULD HAVE HAD THE PIANO<br />
TUNED.<br />
9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />
NONE<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
N/<br />
1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />
2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />
3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />
4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />
5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />
6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />
7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />
YVETTE DOES A WONDERFUL JOB.<br />
8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />
NONE<br />
9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />
NONE<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
ARTIST: ZACHARY LIPTON<br />
CONTRACT #: A8725<br />
TITLE OF PROGRAM: JAZZ QUARTET<br />
TYPE OF PROGRAM: ASSEMBLY/WORKSHOP<br />
DISTRICT/ SCHOOL: NEW ROCHELLE/NEW ROCHELLE HS<br />
# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />
# OF STUDENTS: 250 GRADE(S) 9-12<br />
DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 4/19/12<br />
NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />
STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4 X<br />
ARTIST: ZACHARY WILLIS<br />
CONTRACT #: A7750<br />
TITLE OF PROGRAM: IMPROVISSTIONAL THEATRE<br />
TYPE OF PROGRAM: WORKSHOP<br />
DISTRICT/ SCHOOL: KATONAH/LEWISBORO/JOHN JAY HIGH SCHOOL<br />
# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />
# OF STUDENTS: 20 GRADE(S) 9-12<br />
DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 11/17/11<br />
NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />
STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />
1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />
1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />
1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />
2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />
3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />
4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />
5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />
6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />
7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />
ALL 4 MUSICIANS WERE EXCELLENT BUT WERE ALSO ABLE TO<br />
COMMUNICATE TO THE AUDIENCE AND HOLD EVERYONE'S<br />
ATTENTION. A TERRIFIC PERFORMANCE WITH ADDITIONAL<br />
DISCUSSION ABOUT THE HISTORY OF JAZZ AND HOW A<br />
PERFORMANCE IS PUT TOGETHER.<br />
8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />
WITHOUT MICROPHONES, SOME OF THE DIALOGUE WAS DIFFICULT<br />
TO HEAR IN ALL PARTS OF THE THEATRE.<br />
9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />
HIGHLY RECOMMENDED.<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
4<br />
3<br />
1.<br />
2.<br />
3.<br />
4.<br />
5.<br />
6.<br />
STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />
ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />
EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />
ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />
TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />
QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />
IMPROV IS A GREAT TOOL FOR COMMUNITY BUILDING IN THE<br />
CLASSROOM. IT INVITED STUDENTS TO USE THEIR IMAGINATIONS<br />
AND TO IMPROVE LISTENING SKILLS AND ENCOURAGED THEM TO<br />
THINK ON THEIR FEET.<br />
8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />
PROVIDE A LIST OF READING. (ZACK SAID HE'D PROVIDE THIS)<br />
9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />
ZACK GAVE INDIVIDUALIZED ATTENTION TO EACH OF THE<br />
STUDENTS WHO WERE PARTICIPATING. HIS FEEDBACK WAS<br />
INCISIVE, BUT ENCOURAGING AS A RESULT STUDENTS OPENED UP<br />
AND MADE CHANGES IN THEIR IMPROV GAME.<br />
Arts in Education Service - School Evaluations <strong>2011</strong>-<strong>2012</strong><br />
Page 330 of 332
ARTIST: ZEV HABER<br />
CONTRACT #: A8355<br />
TITLE OF PROGRAM: GUITAR<br />
TYPE OF PROGRAM: WORKSHOP<br />
DISTRICT/ SCHOOL:<br />
# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />
PELHAM/SIWANOY ELEM.<br />
# OF STUDENTS: 7 GRADE(S) 1 & 2<br />
DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 1/30-3/26/12<br />
NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />
STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 X STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />
ARTIST: ZEV HABER<br />
CONTRACT #: A7608A<br />
TITLE OF PROGRAM: GUITAR I<br />
TYPE OF PROGRAM: WORKSHOP<br />
DISTRICT/ SCHOOL:<br />
# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />
PELHAM/SIWANOY ELEM.<br />
# OF STUDENTS: 9 GRADE(S) 1 & 2<br />
DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 10/3-12/5/11<br />
NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />
STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 X STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />
1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />
1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />
1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />
2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />
3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />
4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />
5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />
6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />
4<br />
4<br />
4<br />
4<br />
4<br />
4<br />
1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />
2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />
3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />
4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />
5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />
6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
4<br />
5<br />
7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM?<br />
NONE<br />
Y<br />
WHY?<br />
7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM?<br />
NONE<br />
Y<br />
WHY?<br />
8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />
NONE<br />
9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />
NONE<br />
8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />
NONE<br />
9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />
NONE<br />
ARTIST: ZEV HABER<br />
CONTRACT #: A7608B<br />
TITLE OF PROGRAM: GUITAR II<br />
TYPE OF PROGRAM: WORKSHOP<br />
DISTRICT/ SCHOOL:<br />
# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />
PELHAM/SIWANOY ELEM.<br />
# OF STUDENTS: 9 GRADE(S) 3-5<br />
DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 10/4-11/29/11<br />
NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />
STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 X STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />
ARTIST: ZEV HABER<br />
CONTRACT #: A8057B<br />
TITLE OF PROGRAM: MAKE YOUR OWN CD<br />
TYPE OF PROGRAM: WORKSHOP<br />
DISTRICT/ SCHOOL:<br />
# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />
PELHAM/PROSPECT HILL ELEM.<br />
# OF STUDENTS: 10 GRADE(S) 3-5<br />
DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 1/13-3/9/12<br />
NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />
STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 X STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />
1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />
1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />
1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />
2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />
3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />
4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />
5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />
6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />
2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />
3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />
4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />
5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />
6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM?<br />
NONE<br />
Y<br />
WHY?<br />
7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM?<br />
NONE<br />
Y<br />
WHY?<br />
8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />
NONE<br />
9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />
NONE<br />
8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />
NONE<br />
9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />
NONE<br />
Arts in Education Service - School Evaluations <strong>2011</strong>-<strong>2012</strong><br />
Page 331 of 332
ARTIST: ZEV HABER<br />
CONTRACT #: A8057A<br />
TITLE OF PROGRAM: MUSIC WITH ZEV<br />
TYPE OF PROGRAM: WORKSHOP<br />
DISTRICT/ SCHOOL:<br />
# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />
PELHAM/PROSPECT HILL ELEM.<br />
# OF STUDENTS: 9 GRADE(S) K-2<br />
DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 1/11-3/7/12<br />
NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />
STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 X STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />
ARTIST: ZUCCHINI BROTHERS<br />
CONTRACT #: A8679<br />
TITLE OF PROGRAM: CHARACTER ED MUSICAL SHOW<br />
TYPE OF PROGRAM: ASSEMBLY<br />
DISTRICT/ SCHOOL:<br />
# OF TEACHERS: 1<br />
TARRYTOWN/W. L. MORSE ELEM.<br />
# OF STUDENTS: 238 GRADE(S) 1<br />
DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE 6/8/12<br />
NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM<br />
STANDARD 1 X STANDARD 2 STANDARD 3 X STANDARD 4<br />
1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />
1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT<br />
1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />
2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />
3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />
4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />
5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />
6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />
7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />
NONE<br />
8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />
NONE<br />
9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />
NONE<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
1.<br />
2.<br />
3.<br />
4.<br />
5.<br />
6.<br />
STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................<br />
ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................<br />
EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................<br />
ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................<br />
TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................<br />
QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM? Y WHY?<br />
DYNAMIC, ENTERTAINING, CHILD FRIENDLY AND VERY RELIABLE.<br />
8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:<br />
NONE<br />
9. OTHER COMMENTS:<br />
WE LOVED THEM.<br />
Arts in Education Service - School Evaluations <strong>2011</strong>-<strong>2012</strong><br />
Page 332 of 332