The Canadian Abridgment eDigests - Bankruptcy and Insolvency
The Canadian Abridgment eDigests - Bankruptcy and Insolvency
The Canadian Abridgment eDigests - Bankruptcy and Insolvency
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
<strong>The</strong> <strong>Canadian</strong> <strong>Abridgment</strong> <strong>eDigests</strong> -- <strong>Bankruptcy</strong> <strong>and</strong> <strong>Insolvency</strong><br />
BKY.II.3.a<br />
2005-16<br />
September 05, 2005<br />
Subject Title: <strong>Bankruptcy</strong> <strong>and</strong> insolvency<br />
Classification Number: II.3.a<br />
Assignments in bankruptcy -- Annulment of assignment -- By creditor<br />
Wife brought petition for divorce <strong>and</strong> division of matrimonial property -- Subsequent to receiving<br />
petition husb<strong>and</strong> sold his one-half interest in family farm to his brother, payable over 14 years with no<br />
interest -- At hearing for interim distribution of family property husb<strong>and</strong> acknowledged that there was<br />
payment due to him of approximately $35,000.00 <strong>and</strong> that he would pay half of this to wife -- Husb<strong>and</strong><br />
failed to make payment to wife <strong>and</strong> claimed that he instead used funds to pay debt owed to parents --<br />
Debt to parents was not listed on husb<strong>and</strong>'s financial statements -- Applicant received cheque from his<br />
father for $17,340.00 <strong>and</strong> failed to disclose this to court during hearing for interim distribution of family<br />
property -- Husb<strong>and</strong> was ordered to pay $17,340.00 into his lawyer's trust account -- Husb<strong>and</strong><br />
subsequently made assignment in bankruptcy -- Husb<strong>and</strong>'s bankruptcy Statement of Affairs listed assets<br />
of $381,980.00 <strong>and</strong> unsecured debts of $111,920.00 -- Half of debts were owed to parents <strong>and</strong><br />
approximately $20,000.00 of debt was to credit cards which was accrued over six weeks preceding<br />
assignment in bankruptcy -- Wife brought motion to annul husb<strong>and</strong>'s assignment in bankruptcy <strong>and</strong> to<br />
have family property preserved -- Motion granted -- Annulments of assignments in bankruptcy are<br />
discretionary <strong>and</strong> should only be made when assignment constitutes abuse of process -- Husb<strong>and</strong>'s<br />
actions of deliberately incurring credit card debt, failing to disclose assets <strong>and</strong> apparent solvency<br />
constituted abuse of process -- Husb<strong>and</strong> shall be restrained from disposing of property except by written<br />
consent of wife or by court order.<br />
Hannay v. Hannay (2005), 2005 CarswellSask 404, 2005 SKQB 258 (Sask. Q.B.) [Saskatchewan]<br />
BKY.V.1
Subject Title: <strong>Bankruptcy</strong> <strong>and</strong> insolvency<br />
Classification Number: V.1<br />
Interim receiver -- Appointment<br />
Each of 17 companies listed in style of cause was corporation to which Companies' Creditors<br />
Arrangement Act ("CCAA") applied <strong>and</strong> was subject to initial order of December 17, 2004 --<br />
Companies operated barn producing live hogs for market, save only C Inc., which was controlling<br />
shareholder of other 16 entities -- Under CCAA, stay was granted in respect of creditors' claims <strong>and</strong> O<br />
Inc. was prevented from terminating its contract to purchase all hogs -- O Inc. claimed right to terminate<br />
contract because of clause in contract granting that right in event of insolvency proceedings -- Right to<br />
terminate was suspended by court under its CCAA powers -- While sincere effort had been made by C<br />
Ltd. to initiate proposal, six months had passed, during which companies had prospered under CCAA<br />
protection -- Court acceded to motion for appointment of interim receiver under s. 47(2) of <strong>Bankruptcy</strong><br />
<strong>and</strong> <strong>Insolvency</strong> Act ("BIA") -- Combination of CCAA order <strong>and</strong> s. 47(2) BIA receivership is judgemade<br />
device that enables restructuring or reorganization to take place without involvement of company<br />
management -- Because CCAA regime is not intended to be permanent, court proposed to extend<br />
existing stay of creditors' rights against C Inc. to September 15, 2005, <strong>and</strong> to maintain existing CCAA<br />
regime during that time -- Extension was intended to be final as interests of O Inc. <strong>and</strong> other creditors<br />
could not be suspended indefinitely.<br />
Community Pork Ventures Inc. v. <strong>Canadian</strong> Imperial Bank of Commerce (2005), 2005 CarswellSask<br />
442, 2005 SKQB 294, 11 C.B.R. (5th) 75 (Sask. Q.B.) [Saskatchewan]<br />
BKY.VII.11.a<br />
Subject Title: <strong>Bankruptcy</strong> <strong>and</strong> insolvency<br />
Classification Number: VII.11.a<br />
Proposal -- Companies' Creditors Arrangement Act -- Application of Act<br />
Each of 17 companies listed in style of cause was corporation to which Companies' Creditors<br />
Arrangement Act ("CCAA") applied <strong>and</strong> was subject to initial order of December 17, 2004 --<br />
Companies operated barn producing live hogs for market, save only C Inc., which was controlling
shareholder of other 16 entities -- Under CCAA, stay was granted in respect of creditors' claims <strong>and</strong> O<br />
Inc. was prevented from terminating its contract to purchase all hogs -- O Inc. claimed right to terminate<br />
contract because of clause in contract granting that right in event of insolvency proceedings -- Right to<br />
terminate was suspended by court under its CCAA powers -- While sincere effort had been made by C<br />
Ltd. to initiate proposal, six months had passed, during which companies had prospered under CCAA<br />
protection -- Court acceded to motion for appointment of interim receiver under s. 47(2) of <strong>Bankruptcy</strong><br />
<strong>and</strong> <strong>Insolvency</strong> Act ("BIA") -- Combination of CCAA order <strong>and</strong> s. 47(2) BIA receivership is judgemade<br />
device that enables restructuring or reorganization to take place without involvement of company<br />
management -- Because CCAA regime is not intended to be permanent, court proposed to extend<br />
existing stay of creditors' rights against companies to September 15, 2005, <strong>and</strong> to maintain existing<br />
CCAA regime during that time -- Extension was intended to be final as interests of O Inc. <strong>and</strong> other<br />
creditors could not be suspended indefinitely.<br />
Community Pork Ventures Inc. v. <strong>Canadian</strong> Imperial Bank of Commerce (2005), 2005 CarswellSask<br />
442, 2005 SKQB 294, 11 C.B.R. (5th) 75 (Sask. Q.B.) [Saskatchewan]<br />
BKY.XVI.9<br />
Subject Title: <strong>Bankruptcy</strong> <strong>and</strong> insolvency<br />
Classification Number: XVI.9<br />
Discharge of bankrupt -- Refusal of discharge<br />
Conduct of bankrupt -- Bankrupt 45-year-old man was formerly employed as securities dealer --<br />
Bankrupt declared bankruptcy after being disallowed from securities training by Ontario Securities<br />
Commission -- Bankrupt later found part-time employment -- Bankrupt brought application for<br />
discharge, which was opposed by his Receiver -- Application dismissed -- Bankrupt failed to disclose<br />
RRSPs <strong>and</strong> interest in matrimonial home to trustee on statement of affairs -- This was in contravention<br />
of provisions of <strong>Bankruptcy</strong> <strong>and</strong> <strong>Insolvency</strong> Act designed in order for trustee to assess value of estate<br />
<strong>and</strong> c<strong>and</strong>our of bankrupt -- Bankrupt was dishonest not only in statement of affairs but also in court with<br />
respect to interest in <strong>and</strong> value of matrimonial home -- Bankrupt's conduct established facts under Act<br />
that precluded absolute discharge -- Bankrupt had outst<strong>and</strong>ing surplus income obligation of<br />
approximately $1,000 -- Bankrupt's discharge to be conditional upon his paying outst<strong>and</strong>ing surplus<br />
income obligation as well as additional $9,047 in light of his conduct in bankruptcy <strong>and</strong> earning ability<br />
-- Because of damage to bankruptcy system in face of less than full disclosure by bankrupt, discharge<br />
was suspended for six months commencing upon satisfaction of payment condition.
Bromberg, Re (2005), 2005 CarswellOnt 3024 (Ont. S.C.J.) [Ontario]<br />
BKY.XVI.12<br />
Subject Title: <strong>Bankruptcy</strong> <strong>and</strong> insolvency<br />
Classification Number: XVI.12<br />
Discharge of bankrupt -- Annulment or rescission of discharge<br />
Discharge obtained by fraud -- Bankrupt told trustee that he might be receiving settlement for bicycle<br />
accident -- In June 2004, bankrupt received settlement of $7,700.00 for inability to complete postsecondary<br />
education due to injuries -- Bankrupt failed to tell trustee about settlement -- In July 2004,<br />
bankrupt had sworn affidavit in support of application for discharge from bankruptcy -- Bankrupt<br />
claimed in affidavit that he had no income <strong>and</strong> was residing with his sister -- Bankrupt swore that since<br />
date of assignment in bankruptcy he had acquired or become entitled to acquire no assets -- Based on<br />
this evidence, registrar granted order suspending bankrupt's discharge for six months -- Trustee brought<br />
motion to rescind suspended order of discharge due to bankrupt's failure to disclose settlement funds --<br />
Motion granted -- Section 180(2) of <strong>Bankruptcy</strong> <strong>and</strong> <strong>Insolvency</strong> Act grants court discretion to annul<br />
fraudulently obtained discharges -- Discharge should be annulled due to fraud <strong>and</strong> discharge will be<br />
conditional on payment of entire settlement of $7,700.00 -- Bankrupt must not be allowed to keep any of<br />
settlement because settlement was compensation for economic loss which was property claim which<br />
vests in trustee.<br />
Hogg, Re (2005), 2005 CarswellMan 198, 2005 MBQB 109 (Man. Q.B.) [Manitoba]<br />
BKY.XVII.1.a.i<br />
Subject Title: <strong>Bankruptcy</strong> <strong>and</strong> insolvency<br />
Classification Number: XVII.1.a.i
Effect of bankruptcy on other proceedings -- Proceedings against bankrupt -- Before discharge of<br />
trustee -- General principles<br />
Judgment creditor registered writ of seizure <strong>and</strong> sale against corporation for its real property --<br />
Corporation subsequently made proposal in bankruptcy -- Corporation's creditors did not accept<br />
proposal -- Bankrupt corporation brought motion for discharge of writ of seizure <strong>and</strong> sale of bankrupt's<br />
real property so that it could refinance property -- Motion dismissed -- Section 69 of <strong>Bankruptcy</strong> <strong>and</strong><br />
<strong>Insolvency</strong> Act grants automatic stay of all actions against bankrupt by any creditor, in which case<br />
creditor could not act on writ -- However, there was no authority under <strong>Bankruptcy</strong> <strong>and</strong> <strong>Insolvency</strong> Act<br />
or any other Act to allow bankruptcy judge to lift writ in order to allow refinancing -- Trustee of<br />
proposal can move before court where judgment was granted on regular motions list to have writ lifted if<br />
judgment creditor does not consent to lifting writ.<br />
Gazeta Inc., Re (2005), 2005 CarswellOnt 3125 (Ont. S.C.J.) [Ontario]<br />
BKY.XVII.3<br />
Subject Title: <strong>Bankruptcy</strong> <strong>and</strong> insolvency<br />
Classification Number: XVII.3<br />
Effect of bankruptcy on other proceedings -- Miscellaneous issues<br />
Plaintiff lender <strong>and</strong> defendant borrowers allegedly entered into loan agreements -- Lender registered<br />
mortgages on two properties allegedly granted by borrowers as security for indebtedness -- On alleged<br />
default by borrowers, lender issued notices of sale with respect to both properties -- Borrowers filed for<br />
creditor protection under <strong>Bankruptcy</strong> <strong>and</strong> <strong>Insolvency</strong> Act -- Borrowers brought motion for order<br />
restraining lender from proceeding under notices of sale -- Lender brought cross-motion for summary<br />
judgment for order of possession of properties -- Borrowers took position that signatures on loan<br />
agreements were forged <strong>and</strong> denied granting mortgages -- Cross-motion for summary judgment<br />
dismissed -- Lender failed to satisfy requirements of R. 20.04(2) of Rules of Civil Procedure to show<br />
that no genuine issue existed for trial -- Court's limited m<strong>and</strong>ate under rule did not permit refuting<br />
borrowers' assertion of forgery despite strong forensic affidavit evidence that signatures on agreements<br />
were those of borrowers -- Fact that summary judgment was not available did not preclude court from<br />
considering cross-motion as bankruptcy filing by borrowers in their personal capacity was not relevant<br />
to their alleged position as secured creditors.
George v. Migone (2005), 2005 CarswellOnt 2363 (Ont. S.C.J.) [Ontario]<br />
BKY.XVIII.4<br />
Subject Title: <strong>Bankruptcy</strong> <strong>and</strong> insolvency<br />
Classification Number: XVIII.4<br />
Practice <strong>and</strong> procedure in courts -- Stay of proceedings<br />
Two insolvent companies ("debtors") became involved in legal dispute over extent of indebtedness to<br />
creditor -- At trial, loans were found to be legal <strong>and</strong> enforceable, unpaid, <strong>and</strong> fixed at $9.5 million, only<br />
$1 million of which was secured -- Receiver manager was appointed by order authorizing sale of assets<br />
<strong>and</strong> interim orders of relief from forfeiture pending disposition of appeals -- Debtors brought application<br />
seeking stay of order appointing receiver -- Application was dismissed -- Debtors brought new<br />
application for stay of order authorizing sales process of assets -- Application dismissed -- Debtors were<br />
duly served with notice, but chose not to oppose order -- Debtors were served with order, but chose not<br />
to appeal -- No explanation for failure to act was offered -- Application went beyond terms of order<br />
already granted <strong>and</strong> amounted to injunctive relief in its attempt to enjoin case management judge from<br />
further supervising sales process -- No basis for such order existed, particularly where order itself was<br />
not subject of appeal.<br />
Stampede Oils Inc. v. Knox L.L.C. (2005), 2005 CarswellAlta 740, 2005 ABCA 191 (Alta. C.A. [In<br />
Chambers]) [Alberta]<br />
Copyright © Carswell