18.02.2014 Views

The Canadian Abridgment eDigests - Bankruptcy and Insolvency

The Canadian Abridgment eDigests - Bankruptcy and Insolvency

The Canadian Abridgment eDigests - Bankruptcy and Insolvency

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

<strong>The</strong> <strong>Canadian</strong> <strong>Abridgment</strong> <strong>eDigests</strong> -- <strong>Bankruptcy</strong> <strong>and</strong> <strong>Insolvency</strong><br />

BKY.II.3.a<br />

2005-16<br />

September 05, 2005<br />

Subject Title: <strong>Bankruptcy</strong> <strong>and</strong> insolvency<br />

Classification Number: II.3.a<br />

Assignments in bankruptcy -- Annulment of assignment -- By creditor<br />

Wife brought petition for divorce <strong>and</strong> division of matrimonial property -- Subsequent to receiving<br />

petition husb<strong>and</strong> sold his one-half interest in family farm to his brother, payable over 14 years with no<br />

interest -- At hearing for interim distribution of family property husb<strong>and</strong> acknowledged that there was<br />

payment due to him of approximately $35,000.00 <strong>and</strong> that he would pay half of this to wife -- Husb<strong>and</strong><br />

failed to make payment to wife <strong>and</strong> claimed that he instead used funds to pay debt owed to parents --<br />

Debt to parents was not listed on husb<strong>and</strong>'s financial statements -- Applicant received cheque from his<br />

father for $17,340.00 <strong>and</strong> failed to disclose this to court during hearing for interim distribution of family<br />

property -- Husb<strong>and</strong> was ordered to pay $17,340.00 into his lawyer's trust account -- Husb<strong>and</strong><br />

subsequently made assignment in bankruptcy -- Husb<strong>and</strong>'s bankruptcy Statement of Affairs listed assets<br />

of $381,980.00 <strong>and</strong> unsecured debts of $111,920.00 -- Half of debts were owed to parents <strong>and</strong><br />

approximately $20,000.00 of debt was to credit cards which was accrued over six weeks preceding<br />

assignment in bankruptcy -- Wife brought motion to annul husb<strong>and</strong>'s assignment in bankruptcy <strong>and</strong> to<br />

have family property preserved -- Motion granted -- Annulments of assignments in bankruptcy are<br />

discretionary <strong>and</strong> should only be made when assignment constitutes abuse of process -- Husb<strong>and</strong>'s<br />

actions of deliberately incurring credit card debt, failing to disclose assets <strong>and</strong> apparent solvency<br />

constituted abuse of process -- Husb<strong>and</strong> shall be restrained from disposing of property except by written<br />

consent of wife or by court order.<br />

Hannay v. Hannay (2005), 2005 CarswellSask 404, 2005 SKQB 258 (Sask. Q.B.) [Saskatchewan]<br />

BKY.V.1


Subject Title: <strong>Bankruptcy</strong> <strong>and</strong> insolvency<br />

Classification Number: V.1<br />

Interim receiver -- Appointment<br />

Each of 17 companies listed in style of cause was corporation to which Companies' Creditors<br />

Arrangement Act ("CCAA") applied <strong>and</strong> was subject to initial order of December 17, 2004 --<br />

Companies operated barn producing live hogs for market, save only C Inc., which was controlling<br />

shareholder of other 16 entities -- Under CCAA, stay was granted in respect of creditors' claims <strong>and</strong> O<br />

Inc. was prevented from terminating its contract to purchase all hogs -- O Inc. claimed right to terminate<br />

contract because of clause in contract granting that right in event of insolvency proceedings -- Right to<br />

terminate was suspended by court under its CCAA powers -- While sincere effort had been made by C<br />

Ltd. to initiate proposal, six months had passed, during which companies had prospered under CCAA<br />

protection -- Court acceded to motion for appointment of interim receiver under s. 47(2) of <strong>Bankruptcy</strong><br />

<strong>and</strong> <strong>Insolvency</strong> Act ("BIA") -- Combination of CCAA order <strong>and</strong> s. 47(2) BIA receivership is judgemade<br />

device that enables restructuring or reorganization to take place without involvement of company<br />

management -- Because CCAA regime is not intended to be permanent, court proposed to extend<br />

existing stay of creditors' rights against C Inc. to September 15, 2005, <strong>and</strong> to maintain existing CCAA<br />

regime during that time -- Extension was intended to be final as interests of O Inc. <strong>and</strong> other creditors<br />

could not be suspended indefinitely.<br />

Community Pork Ventures Inc. v. <strong>Canadian</strong> Imperial Bank of Commerce (2005), 2005 CarswellSask<br />

442, 2005 SKQB 294, 11 C.B.R. (5th) 75 (Sask. Q.B.) [Saskatchewan]<br />

BKY.VII.11.a<br />

Subject Title: <strong>Bankruptcy</strong> <strong>and</strong> insolvency<br />

Classification Number: VII.11.a<br />

Proposal -- Companies' Creditors Arrangement Act -- Application of Act<br />

Each of 17 companies listed in style of cause was corporation to which Companies' Creditors<br />

Arrangement Act ("CCAA") applied <strong>and</strong> was subject to initial order of December 17, 2004 --<br />

Companies operated barn producing live hogs for market, save only C Inc., which was controlling


shareholder of other 16 entities -- Under CCAA, stay was granted in respect of creditors' claims <strong>and</strong> O<br />

Inc. was prevented from terminating its contract to purchase all hogs -- O Inc. claimed right to terminate<br />

contract because of clause in contract granting that right in event of insolvency proceedings -- Right to<br />

terminate was suspended by court under its CCAA powers -- While sincere effort had been made by C<br />

Ltd. to initiate proposal, six months had passed, during which companies had prospered under CCAA<br />

protection -- Court acceded to motion for appointment of interim receiver under s. 47(2) of <strong>Bankruptcy</strong><br />

<strong>and</strong> <strong>Insolvency</strong> Act ("BIA") -- Combination of CCAA order <strong>and</strong> s. 47(2) BIA receivership is judgemade<br />

device that enables restructuring or reorganization to take place without involvement of company<br />

management -- Because CCAA regime is not intended to be permanent, court proposed to extend<br />

existing stay of creditors' rights against companies to September 15, 2005, <strong>and</strong> to maintain existing<br />

CCAA regime during that time -- Extension was intended to be final as interests of O Inc. <strong>and</strong> other<br />

creditors could not be suspended indefinitely.<br />

Community Pork Ventures Inc. v. <strong>Canadian</strong> Imperial Bank of Commerce (2005), 2005 CarswellSask<br />

442, 2005 SKQB 294, 11 C.B.R. (5th) 75 (Sask. Q.B.) [Saskatchewan]<br />

BKY.XVI.9<br />

Subject Title: <strong>Bankruptcy</strong> <strong>and</strong> insolvency<br />

Classification Number: XVI.9<br />

Discharge of bankrupt -- Refusal of discharge<br />

Conduct of bankrupt -- Bankrupt 45-year-old man was formerly employed as securities dealer --<br />

Bankrupt declared bankruptcy after being disallowed from securities training by Ontario Securities<br />

Commission -- Bankrupt later found part-time employment -- Bankrupt brought application for<br />

discharge, which was opposed by his Receiver -- Application dismissed -- Bankrupt failed to disclose<br />

RRSPs <strong>and</strong> interest in matrimonial home to trustee on statement of affairs -- This was in contravention<br />

of provisions of <strong>Bankruptcy</strong> <strong>and</strong> <strong>Insolvency</strong> Act designed in order for trustee to assess value of estate<br />

<strong>and</strong> c<strong>and</strong>our of bankrupt -- Bankrupt was dishonest not only in statement of affairs but also in court with<br />

respect to interest in <strong>and</strong> value of matrimonial home -- Bankrupt's conduct established facts under Act<br />

that precluded absolute discharge -- Bankrupt had outst<strong>and</strong>ing surplus income obligation of<br />

approximately $1,000 -- Bankrupt's discharge to be conditional upon his paying outst<strong>and</strong>ing surplus<br />

income obligation as well as additional $9,047 in light of his conduct in bankruptcy <strong>and</strong> earning ability<br />

-- Because of damage to bankruptcy system in face of less than full disclosure by bankrupt, discharge<br />

was suspended for six months commencing upon satisfaction of payment condition.


Bromberg, Re (2005), 2005 CarswellOnt 3024 (Ont. S.C.J.) [Ontario]<br />

BKY.XVI.12<br />

Subject Title: <strong>Bankruptcy</strong> <strong>and</strong> insolvency<br />

Classification Number: XVI.12<br />

Discharge of bankrupt -- Annulment or rescission of discharge<br />

Discharge obtained by fraud -- Bankrupt told trustee that he might be receiving settlement for bicycle<br />

accident -- In June 2004, bankrupt received settlement of $7,700.00 for inability to complete postsecondary<br />

education due to injuries -- Bankrupt failed to tell trustee about settlement -- In July 2004,<br />

bankrupt had sworn affidavit in support of application for discharge from bankruptcy -- Bankrupt<br />

claimed in affidavit that he had no income <strong>and</strong> was residing with his sister -- Bankrupt swore that since<br />

date of assignment in bankruptcy he had acquired or become entitled to acquire no assets -- Based on<br />

this evidence, registrar granted order suspending bankrupt's discharge for six months -- Trustee brought<br />

motion to rescind suspended order of discharge due to bankrupt's failure to disclose settlement funds --<br />

Motion granted -- Section 180(2) of <strong>Bankruptcy</strong> <strong>and</strong> <strong>Insolvency</strong> Act grants court discretion to annul<br />

fraudulently obtained discharges -- Discharge should be annulled due to fraud <strong>and</strong> discharge will be<br />

conditional on payment of entire settlement of $7,700.00 -- Bankrupt must not be allowed to keep any of<br />

settlement because settlement was compensation for economic loss which was property claim which<br />

vests in trustee.<br />

Hogg, Re (2005), 2005 CarswellMan 198, 2005 MBQB 109 (Man. Q.B.) [Manitoba]<br />

BKY.XVII.1.a.i<br />

Subject Title: <strong>Bankruptcy</strong> <strong>and</strong> insolvency<br />

Classification Number: XVII.1.a.i


Effect of bankruptcy on other proceedings -- Proceedings against bankrupt -- Before discharge of<br />

trustee -- General principles<br />

Judgment creditor registered writ of seizure <strong>and</strong> sale against corporation for its real property --<br />

Corporation subsequently made proposal in bankruptcy -- Corporation's creditors did not accept<br />

proposal -- Bankrupt corporation brought motion for discharge of writ of seizure <strong>and</strong> sale of bankrupt's<br />

real property so that it could refinance property -- Motion dismissed -- Section 69 of <strong>Bankruptcy</strong> <strong>and</strong><br />

<strong>Insolvency</strong> Act grants automatic stay of all actions against bankrupt by any creditor, in which case<br />

creditor could not act on writ -- However, there was no authority under <strong>Bankruptcy</strong> <strong>and</strong> <strong>Insolvency</strong> Act<br />

or any other Act to allow bankruptcy judge to lift writ in order to allow refinancing -- Trustee of<br />

proposal can move before court where judgment was granted on regular motions list to have writ lifted if<br />

judgment creditor does not consent to lifting writ.<br />

Gazeta Inc., Re (2005), 2005 CarswellOnt 3125 (Ont. S.C.J.) [Ontario]<br />

BKY.XVII.3<br />

Subject Title: <strong>Bankruptcy</strong> <strong>and</strong> insolvency<br />

Classification Number: XVII.3<br />

Effect of bankruptcy on other proceedings -- Miscellaneous issues<br />

Plaintiff lender <strong>and</strong> defendant borrowers allegedly entered into loan agreements -- Lender registered<br />

mortgages on two properties allegedly granted by borrowers as security for indebtedness -- On alleged<br />

default by borrowers, lender issued notices of sale with respect to both properties -- Borrowers filed for<br />

creditor protection under <strong>Bankruptcy</strong> <strong>and</strong> <strong>Insolvency</strong> Act -- Borrowers brought motion for order<br />

restraining lender from proceeding under notices of sale -- Lender brought cross-motion for summary<br />

judgment for order of possession of properties -- Borrowers took position that signatures on loan<br />

agreements were forged <strong>and</strong> denied granting mortgages -- Cross-motion for summary judgment<br />

dismissed -- Lender failed to satisfy requirements of R. 20.04(2) of Rules of Civil Procedure to show<br />

that no genuine issue existed for trial -- Court's limited m<strong>and</strong>ate under rule did not permit refuting<br />

borrowers' assertion of forgery despite strong forensic affidavit evidence that signatures on agreements<br />

were those of borrowers -- Fact that summary judgment was not available did not preclude court from<br />

considering cross-motion as bankruptcy filing by borrowers in their personal capacity was not relevant<br />

to their alleged position as secured creditors.


George v. Migone (2005), 2005 CarswellOnt 2363 (Ont. S.C.J.) [Ontario]<br />

BKY.XVIII.4<br />

Subject Title: <strong>Bankruptcy</strong> <strong>and</strong> insolvency<br />

Classification Number: XVIII.4<br />

Practice <strong>and</strong> procedure in courts -- Stay of proceedings<br />

Two insolvent companies ("debtors") became involved in legal dispute over extent of indebtedness to<br />

creditor -- At trial, loans were found to be legal <strong>and</strong> enforceable, unpaid, <strong>and</strong> fixed at $9.5 million, only<br />

$1 million of which was secured -- Receiver manager was appointed by order authorizing sale of assets<br />

<strong>and</strong> interim orders of relief from forfeiture pending disposition of appeals -- Debtors brought application<br />

seeking stay of order appointing receiver -- Application was dismissed -- Debtors brought new<br />

application for stay of order authorizing sales process of assets -- Application dismissed -- Debtors were<br />

duly served with notice, but chose not to oppose order -- Debtors were served with order, but chose not<br />

to appeal -- No explanation for failure to act was offered -- Application went beyond terms of order<br />

already granted <strong>and</strong> amounted to injunctive relief in its attempt to enjoin case management judge from<br />

further supervising sales process -- No basis for such order existed, particularly where order itself was<br />

not subject of appeal.<br />

Stampede Oils Inc. v. Knox L.L.C. (2005), 2005 CarswellAlta 740, 2005 ABCA 191 (Alta. C.A. [In<br />

Chambers]) [Alberta]<br />

Copyright © Carswell

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!