24.02.2014 Views

2006 ANNUAL REPORT & PROGRAMME REPORT ... - Prolinnova

2006 ANNUAL REPORT & PROGRAMME REPORT ... - Prolinnova

2006 ANNUAL REPORT & PROGRAMME REPORT ... - Prolinnova

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Figure 2: Composition of PROLINNOVA country partnerships, November <strong>2006</strong><br />

Stakeholders in <strong>Prolinnova</strong> Country Partnerships<br />

Farmer O<br />

9%<br />

Research<br />

13%<br />

Uni<br />

16%<br />

Other<br />

4%<br />

MoA/Ext<br />

22%<br />

NGO<br />

36%<br />

NGO<br />

MoA/Ext<br />

Research<br />

Farmer O<br />

Uni<br />

Other<br />

While all activities implemented and reported have played a role in achieving this outcome, a<br />

few overall factors have probably been decisive. First of all, it is the quality of the<br />

coordinating organisations in the countries, NGOs, both in terms of understanding the PID<br />

approach and their capacity in bringing various stakeholders together effectively. The fact<br />

that most of these lead NGOs were known to ETC though cooperation in previous<br />

programmes made their selection relatively straight forward. Secondly, the strongly<br />

decentralised design of PROLINNOVA has allowed organisations in the countries to set own<br />

priorities, to define collaboration structures most suitable locally, and to adapt to local<br />

conditions and opportunities, which has led to strong feelings of ownership and commitment<br />

among country partners. All backstopping by the IST has been organised to further enhance<br />

these dynamics, and to find the best ways to support these local processes. And finally, the<br />

three well-facilitated annual meetings provided concrete platforms to operationalise such<br />

decentralised functioning while still ensuring adequate coherence among activities in all<br />

countries. Evaluations of these meetings are evidence of this. The fact that some countries<br />

insisted that the meetings take place annually, rather than once every two years as foreseen<br />

in the proposal, confirms their interest in these crucial events.<br />

3.2 Create strong international awareness and credibility of PROLINNOVA and<br />

PID<br />

The data from Annex 2 show that most activities planned under this PROLINNOVA purpose<br />

have been realised – even above expectations – in the period 2004-<strong>2006</strong>. The targets set for<br />

international publications in the field of PID and presentations to international fora have been<br />

exceeded substantially. As part of the re-planning needed to accommodate the transition<br />

from TMF to the new MFS funding cycle, the international conference foreseen for 2007 was<br />

replaced by the co-hosting of the Innovation in Africa Symposium. Similarly, the book that<br />

was to be linked to the 2007 conference was replaced by two practical booklets on<br />

PROLINNOVA’s experiences. Its only the two policy briefs that could not be published as<br />

planned, partly because of the time pressure caused by the transition to MFS and partly<br />

because the experiences within PROLINNOVA were felt to be not mature enough to be put into<br />

the form of policy briefs.<br />

33196 Programme Report PROLINNOVA 2004-<strong>2006</strong> 44

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!