2006 ANNUAL REPORT & PROGRAMME REPORT ... - Prolinnova
2006 ANNUAL REPORT & PROGRAMME REPORT ... - Prolinnova
2006 ANNUAL REPORT & PROGRAMME REPORT ... - Prolinnova
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
Figure 2: Composition of PROLINNOVA country partnerships, November <strong>2006</strong><br />
Stakeholders in <strong>Prolinnova</strong> Country Partnerships<br />
Farmer O<br />
9%<br />
Research<br />
13%<br />
Uni<br />
16%<br />
Other<br />
4%<br />
MoA/Ext<br />
22%<br />
NGO<br />
36%<br />
NGO<br />
MoA/Ext<br />
Research<br />
Farmer O<br />
Uni<br />
Other<br />
While all activities implemented and reported have played a role in achieving this outcome, a<br />
few overall factors have probably been decisive. First of all, it is the quality of the<br />
coordinating organisations in the countries, NGOs, both in terms of understanding the PID<br />
approach and their capacity in bringing various stakeholders together effectively. The fact<br />
that most of these lead NGOs were known to ETC though cooperation in previous<br />
programmes made their selection relatively straight forward. Secondly, the strongly<br />
decentralised design of PROLINNOVA has allowed organisations in the countries to set own<br />
priorities, to define collaboration structures most suitable locally, and to adapt to local<br />
conditions and opportunities, which has led to strong feelings of ownership and commitment<br />
among country partners. All backstopping by the IST has been organised to further enhance<br />
these dynamics, and to find the best ways to support these local processes. And finally, the<br />
three well-facilitated annual meetings provided concrete platforms to operationalise such<br />
decentralised functioning while still ensuring adequate coherence among activities in all<br />
countries. Evaluations of these meetings are evidence of this. The fact that some countries<br />
insisted that the meetings take place annually, rather than once every two years as foreseen<br />
in the proposal, confirms their interest in these crucial events.<br />
3.2 Create strong international awareness and credibility of PROLINNOVA and<br />
PID<br />
The data from Annex 2 show that most activities planned under this PROLINNOVA purpose<br />
have been realised – even above expectations – in the period 2004-<strong>2006</strong>. The targets set for<br />
international publications in the field of PID and presentations to international fora have been<br />
exceeded substantially. As part of the re-planning needed to accommodate the transition<br />
from TMF to the new MFS funding cycle, the international conference foreseen for 2007 was<br />
replaced by the co-hosting of the Innovation in Africa Symposium. Similarly, the book that<br />
was to be linked to the 2007 conference was replaced by two practical booklets on<br />
PROLINNOVA’s experiences. Its only the two policy briefs that could not be published as<br />
planned, partly because of the time pressure caused by the transition to MFS and partly<br />
because the experiences within PROLINNOVA were felt to be not mature enough to be put into<br />
the form of policy briefs.<br />
33196 Programme Report PROLINNOVA 2004-<strong>2006</strong> 44