28.02.2014 Views

The Fruticose Species of Usnea Subgenus Usnea in East Africa

The Fruticose Species of Usnea Subgenus Usnea in East Africa

The Fruticose Species of Usnea Subgenus Usnea in East Africa

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

212 THE LICHENOLOGIST Vol. 11<br />

non-pigmented groups. (<strong>The</strong> most exceptional case <strong>in</strong> the pigmented groups,<br />

namely, the primary species with pigmented medulla (<strong>Usnea</strong> subflorida), with three<br />

chemical races, had two <strong>of</strong> those represented at only three out <strong>of</strong> the 22 localities<br />

from which collections <strong>of</strong> this species were made.)<br />

<strong>The</strong> three non-pigmented groups were then exam<strong>in</strong>ed <strong>in</strong> order to delimit the<br />

species with<strong>in</strong> them, and they are discussed <strong>in</strong> turn below.<br />

In the group <strong>of</strong> non-pigmented primary species <strong>Usnea</strong> picta could be separated<br />

out as a robust species with stiff branches and many tubercles rather than papillae.<br />

<strong>The</strong> stiffness <strong>of</strong> the branches appears to be due partly to the thickness <strong>of</strong> the cortex,<br />

and this character was therefore compared <strong>in</strong> plants assigned respectively to U.<br />

picta, U. submollis, and U. nodulosa. (Both the last two species have robust morphotypes<br />

that might be compared with U. picta, whereas U. complanata is a slenderer<br />

species and U. albontaculata has other differences, discussed below.) Five specimens<br />

<strong>of</strong> U. picta, U. submollis, and U. nodulosa were chosen <strong>of</strong> comparable size, three<br />

ma<strong>in</strong> branches from each were sectioned, and the width <strong>of</strong> the cortex was measured<br />

microscopically to the nearest 0-05 mm. S<strong>in</strong>ce both <strong>in</strong>ner and outer surfaces <strong>of</strong> the<br />

cortex are ridged and nodular, the width was measured so far as possible at po<strong>in</strong>ts<br />

without these irregularities. <strong>The</strong> results are shown <strong>in</strong> Table 3. Though the differences<br />

are slight they are fairly consistent and when tested further were found to be<br />

taxonomically helpful if <strong>in</strong>terpreted as follows: the cortex <strong>of</strong> U. picta is usually<br />

0-1 mm thick or more, while <strong>in</strong> the other species it is usually less.<br />

TABLE 3. Mean width <strong>of</strong> cortex (mm) <strong>of</strong> three branches from five specimens <strong>of</strong> species <strong>in</strong>dicated<br />

<strong>Species</strong><br />

1<br />

2<br />

Specimen<br />

3<br />

4<br />

5<br />

Grand<br />

mean<br />

U. picta<br />

U. submollis<br />

U. nodulosa<br />

010<br />

010<br />

008<br />

013<br />

009<br />

008<br />

011<br />

008<br />

010<br />

011<br />

009<br />

009<br />

009<br />

009<br />

008<br />

011<br />

009<br />

009<br />

Like <strong>Usnea</strong> picta, U. nodulosa has tubercles rather than papillae; they are <strong>of</strong>ten<br />

elongate or effigurate as well as orbicular. However, U. nodulosa has branches that<br />

are more pliant ow<strong>in</strong>g to their th<strong>in</strong>ner cortex, more <strong>of</strong>ten develop laterally <strong>in</strong>stead <strong>of</strong><br />

by isotomic dichotomy, and are more <strong>of</strong>ten fusiform than tapered.<br />

<strong>The</strong> other species <strong>in</strong> this group are characterized by hav<strong>in</strong>g papillae and small<br />

nodular tubercles rather than the larger, l<strong>in</strong>ear or effigurate tubercles <strong>of</strong> <strong>Usnea</strong> picta<br />

and U. nodulosa. <strong>The</strong>se species are <strong>Usnea</strong> complanata, U. submollis, and U. albomaculata.<br />

(U. <strong>in</strong>tumescens Mot., a doubtful species <strong>in</strong> the U. submollis aggregate,<br />

also comes <strong>in</strong>to this group but is excluded from separate consideration: see under<br />

U. albomaculata below.) It appeared from our material that the frequency <strong>of</strong> sp<strong>in</strong>ules<br />

varied <strong>in</strong>versely with that <strong>of</strong> papillae or tubercles. Some specimens are <strong>in</strong>termediate<br />

<strong>in</strong> this respect, and decisions on them were doubtful. However, after<br />

exam<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g the types <strong>of</strong> these three species we assigned our specimens to two ma<strong>in</strong><br />

groups. <strong>The</strong> first group, with the frequency <strong>of</strong> sp<strong>in</strong>ules high and <strong>of</strong> papillae low,<br />

was taken to represent U. complanata. <strong>The</strong> second group, with the frequency <strong>of</strong><br />

sp<strong>in</strong>ules low and <strong>of</strong> papillae high, was taken to represent U. submollis and U.<br />

albomaculata.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!