03.03.2014 Views

RABEA, E.I., BADAWY, M.E.I., STEURBAUT, W ... - Insects.ugent.be

RABEA, E.I., BADAWY, M.E.I., STEURBAUT, W ... - Insects.ugent.be

RABEA, E.I., BADAWY, M.E.I., STEURBAUT, W ... - Insects.ugent.be

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Comm. Appl. Biol. Sci, Ghent University, 70/4, 2005 823<br />

INSECTICIDAL AND GROWTH INHIBITION EFFECTS<br />

OF CHITOSAN DERIVATIVES CONTAINING AN N-ALKYL<br />

GROUP ON THE COTTON LEAFWORM<br />

SPODOPTERA LITTORALIS<br />

E.I. <strong>RABEA</strong> 1 , M.E.I. <strong>BADAWY</strong> 1 , W. <strong>STEURBAUT</strong> 2 , T.M. ROGGE 3 ,<br />

C.V. STEVENS 3 & G. SMAGGHE 2<br />

1 Department of Pesticide Chemistry, Faculty of Agriculture, Alexandria University, Egypt,<br />

2 Department of Crop Protection; 3 Department of Organic Chemistry; Faculty of Bioscience<br />

Engineering, Ghent University, Coupure links 653, B-9000 Gent, Belgium<br />

E-mail: entsar_ibrahim@yahoo.com<br />

INTRODUCTION<br />

Deacetylation of chitin, the second most abundant biopolymer isolated from<br />

insects, crustaceans such as crab and shrimp as well as from fungi, leads to<br />

poly-(1,4)-D-glucosamine or the so called chitosan with excellent biodegradable<br />

and biocompatible characteristics (Kurita et al., 2000). Chitosan has<br />

<strong>be</strong>come of great interest not only as an underutilized resource, but also as a<br />

new functional material with high potential in various fields. N-alkyl chitosan<br />

derivatives were prepared by introducing alkyl groups into the amine<br />

groups of chitosan (Muzzarelli et al., 1983 and 1990). In this study, a series<br />

of chitosan derivatives containing an alkyl group, N-alkyl chitosan (NAC)<br />

derivatives, were synthesized using a reductive alkylation reaction to examine<br />

their insecticidal and growth inhibition activities against the larvae of<br />

the cotton leafworm Spodoptera littoralis (Boisduval) (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae).<br />

MATERIALS AND METHODS<br />

Materials<br />

Chitosan of low molecular weight (made from crab shells, 85% degree of<br />

deacetylation, DDA) and aldehydes were purchased from Sigma-Aldrich Co.<br />

(Bornem, Belgium). Soy<strong>be</strong>an-wheat germ insect artificial diet was purchased<br />

from Stonefly Ind. (Bryan, TX, USA). NAC derivatives were synthesized according<br />

to Kim et al., (1997). All materials were used without further purification.<br />

Methods<br />

Insecticidal feeding and Growth-inhibitory bioassay against S. littoralis<br />

Third-instar larvae of S. littoralis were selected from a laboratory colony reared<br />

on artificial diet under controlled conditions at 25±2°C, 70±5% RH and a<br />

16h light photoperiod (Smagghe et al., 2001). Chitosan and synthesized derivatives<br />

were tested at 5 g kg -1 in artificial diet, with 30 larvae per product<br />

each. After 7 days of continuous feeding on treated artificial diet, mortality


824<br />

was scored and compared with the control that had <strong>be</strong>en exposed to a diet<br />

treated with solvent only (water and 1% acetic acid in water) (Smagghe et al.,<br />

2000).<br />

The growth inhibitory activity against S. littoralis was measured by a feeding<br />

trial using artificial diet based on larval weight gain through 5 days of feeding<br />

on artificial diet incorporated with the most active compounds with a<br />

growth-inhibitory effect, namely N-(propyl) chitosan, N-(undecanyl) chitosan<br />

and N-(3-phenylpropyl) chitosan. Growth inhibition percentage was calculated<br />

from this equation:<br />

Growth inhibition (%) = [(CL-TL)/CL] x100<br />

Where CL is the larval weight gained in the control and TL is the larval weight<br />

gained in the treatment.<br />

RESULTS AND DISCUSSION<br />

Insecticidal activity of NAC derivatives against S. littoralis<br />

The NAC derivatives had a <strong>be</strong>tter insecticidal activity than chitosan itself<br />

(Table 1). This might <strong>be</strong> explained by the increased lipophilicity of the derivatives<br />

which can lead to improved membrane permeability. The result shows<br />

that the most active compound was N-(3-phenylbutyl) chitosan (17) with<br />

50% mortality, followed by N-(tridecanyl) chitosan (13) and N-(2-phenylethyl)<br />

chitosan (14) with 47% and 37%, respectively. N-pentyl chitosan (2), N-<br />

(ethylbutyl) chitosan (7), N-(2-nonenyl) chitosan (10) and N-(3-phenylpropyl)<br />

chitosan (16) were the moderately active compounds. N-(nonyl) chitosan (9)<br />

was the least active in these derivatives. As exemplified with compounds 2<br />

and 3, branching of the side chains led to a slight decrease in the insecticidal<br />

activity, but the activity was still relatively high. The activity was further<br />

increased when a double bond was introduced in the side chain (compound<br />

9 vs. 10), but overall the activity was still adequate. The exchange of<br />

the hydrogen atom in the long chain with a phenyl ring led to high toxicity<br />

toward larvae of S. littoralis (see compounds 14, 15, 16, 17). In addition, our<br />

results demonstrated that the activity was elevated with an increase of the<br />

chain length. From our results it can <strong>be</strong> concluded that chitosan has low<br />

insecticidal activity against larvae of S. littoralis but chemical modification of<br />

it led to a moderate increase of the activity especially for N-(3-phenylbutyl)<br />

chitosan (17) and N-(tridecanyl) chitosan (13).<br />

In addition, the growth inhibitory activity of N-(propyl) chitosan (1), N-<br />

(undecanyl) chitosan (12) and N-(3-phenyl propyl) chitosan (16) at 5 g kg -1 on<br />

S. littoralis are shown in Table 2. The tested compounds inhibited the larval<br />

growth in a time-dependant manner from the first day of feeding on the treated<br />

diet. As shown in Table 2, the maximum inhibition of growth was observed<br />

on the 4 th day. The development of larvae reared on a treated diet was<br />

shown in Fig. 1. There was a 2-3 fold reduction in weight gain and length in<br />

larvae fed with treated diet. Typically in intoxicated larvae, the normal ecdysis<br />

process was affected with symptoms of inhibition of feeding and weight<br />

gain and the larvae were very small compared to the control. An incomplete<br />

shedding of the old cuticle and the old head capsule covering the new white


Comm. Appl. Biol. Sci, Ghent University, 70/4, 2005 825<br />

capsule were observed. Inhibition of growth and antifeedant effects was observed<br />

(Fig. 1). However, the targets and mechanism of action in insects for<br />

these chitosan derivatives remain unknown so far. As descri<strong>be</strong>d in the literature,<br />

the mechanisms could include repellency, disruption of feeding physiology,<br />

or a chronic toxicity possibly related to the insecticidal action (Ross<br />

and Brown, 1982).<br />

Table 1. Insecticidal activity (%) of NAC derivatives at 5 g kg -1 against third-instar<br />

larvae of S. littoralis by feeding on artificial diet. Data are expressed as mean percentages<br />

± SEM based on 3 replicates per tested compound, n=30.<br />

OH<br />

OH<br />

O<br />

O O<br />

HO<br />

O<br />

NH HO<br />

O<br />

NH<br />

H 2 C<br />

R AC<br />

n<br />

Compound R (DS) Mortality (%)<br />

± SE<br />

1 CH3CH2 0.05 26.7±6.7<br />

2 CH3(CH2)3 0.28 30±5.8<br />

3 CH3CH(CH3)CH2 0.04 20±9.9<br />

4 HOCH2(CH2)3 0.02 10±0.0<br />

5 CH3CH(CH3)(CH2)2 0.17 16.7±3.3<br />

6 cyclohexyl 0.25 16.7±12.0<br />

7 CH3CH(C2H5)CH2 0.15 33.3±3.3<br />

8 CH3(CH2)5 0.23 13.3±8.8<br />

9 CH3(CH2)7 0.04 6.7±6.7<br />

10 CH3(CH2)5CH=CH 0.22 30±15.3<br />

11 CH3(CH2)8 0.22 33.3±3.3<br />

12 CH3(CH2)9 0.06 30±0.0<br />

13 CH3(CH2)11 0.09 46.7±8.8<br />

14 (C6H5)CH2 0.10 36.7±13.3<br />

15 (C6H5)2CH 0.32 33.3±6.7<br />

16 (C6H5)CH2CH2 0.14 33.3±6.7<br />

17 CH3CH(C6H5)CH2 0.37 50±0.0<br />

a Degree of substitution<br />

Table 2. Growth inhibition activity (%) of N-(propyl) chitosan, N-(undecanyl) chitosan<br />

and N-(3-phenylpropyl) chitosan at 5 g kg -1 on S. littoralis during 5 days of feeding on<br />

treated diet. Data are expressed as mean percentages ± SEM based on 3 replicates per<br />

tested compound; n=30.<br />

Compound<br />

Time (day)<br />

1 2 3 4 5<br />

1 57.04±0.02 61.09±0.04 66.75±0.05 75.86±0.04 70.05±0.16<br />

12 51.46±0.004 65.35±0.04 63.67±0.04 65.94±0.02 59.46±0.14<br />

16 44.25±0.02 55.27±0.03 60.41±0.03 64.73±0.04 59.53±0.15


826<br />

450<br />

400<br />

350<br />

Contol<br />

Compound 1<br />

Compound 12<br />

(A)<br />

300<br />

Compound 16<br />

Weight of larvae (mg)<br />

250<br />

200<br />

150<br />

100<br />

50<br />

0<br />

0 1 2 3 4 5<br />

Time (day)<br />

Control<br />

(1)<br />

(12)<br />

Larval length<br />

(mm±SEM )<br />

(26.8±0.10)<br />

(12.4±0.08)<br />

(13.2±0.05)<br />

Figure 1. Development of S. littoralis reared<br />

on artificial diet containing 5 g kg -1 of N-<br />

(propyl) chitosan (1), N-(undecanyl) chitosan<br />

(12) and N-(3-phenylpropyl) chitosan (16). A:<br />

Weight of larvae (mg) of control and treatments<br />

were critically measured on several<br />

days of treatment and data are expressed as<br />

mean percentages ± SEM based on 3 replicates<br />

per tested compound; n=30. B: Photograph<br />

of larvae grown on a diet without<br />

treatment showing normal growth and on a<br />

diet containing 5 g kg -1 of treatments showing<br />

stunted growth.<br />

(16)<br />

(13.8±0.10)<br />

(B)<br />

REFERENCES<br />

KIM C.H., CHO J.W. & CHUN H.J. (1997). Synthesis of chitosan derivatives with quaternary<br />

ammonium salt and their antibacterial activity. Polym Bull 38:387-393.<br />

KURITA K., KOJIMA T., NISHIYAMA Y. & SHIMOJOH M. (2000). Synthesis and some properties<br />

of nonnatural amino polysaccharides: Branched chitin and chitosan. Macromol<br />

33:4711-4716.<br />

MUZZARELLI R., TARSI R., FILLIPINI O., GIOVANETTI E., BIANGINI G. & VARALDO P.E. (1990).<br />

Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 34:2019-2023.<br />

MUZZARELLI R.A.A., TANFANI F., EMANUELLI M. & MARIOTTI S. (1983). The characterization<br />

of N-methyl, N-ethyl, N-propyl, N-butyl and N-hexyl chitosans, novel film-forming<br />

polymers. J Membrane Sci 18:295-308.


Comm. Appl. Biol. Sci, Ghent University, 70/4, 2005 827<br />

ROSS D.C. & BROWN T.M. (1982). Inhibation of larval growth in Spodoptera frugiperda<br />

by sublethal dietary concentrations of insecticides. J Agric Food Chem 30:193-196.<br />

SMAGGHE G., CARTON B., DECOMBEL L. & TIRRY L. (2001). Significance of absorption,<br />

oxidation, and binding to toxicity of four ecdysone agonists in multi-resistant cotton<br />

leafworm. Arch Insect Biochemistry & Physiology 46:127-139.<br />

SMAGGHE G., MEDINA P., SCHUYESMANS S., TIRRY L. & VINUELA E. (2000). Insecticide<br />

resistant monitoring of tebufenozide for managing Spodoptera exigua (Hübner<br />

[1808]). Bol San Veg Plagas 26:475-481.


828

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!