05.03.2014 Views

Guidance Note on Prevention of End-User Piracy in Business

Guidance Note on Prevention of End-User Piracy in Business

Guidance Note on Prevention of End-User Piracy in Business

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

(III) What are the Resp<strong>on</strong>sibilities <strong>of</strong><br />

Directors/Partners <strong>of</strong> a Bus<strong>in</strong>ess <strong>in</strong><br />

guard<strong>in</strong>g aga<strong>in</strong>st <strong>Piracy</strong>?<br />

Directors/partners may be subject to crim<strong>in</strong>al liability if their bodies corporate/<br />

partnerships have d<strong>on</strong>e an <strong>in</strong>fr<strong>in</strong>g<strong>in</strong>g act stated <strong>in</strong> Part (I) above that attracts bus<strong>in</strong>ess<br />

end-user crim<strong>in</strong>al liability. Hence, directors/partners are well advised to take prudent<br />

steps to guard aga<strong>in</strong>st bus<strong>in</strong>ess end-user piracy activities.<br />

Who would be liable?<br />

The directors’/partners’ liability provisi<strong>on</strong> applies to –<br />

• Company directors or partners who are resp<strong>on</strong>sible for the <strong>in</strong>ternal management<br />

<strong>of</strong> their organisati<strong>on</strong>s; or<br />

• If there is no such director or partner, the pers<strong>on</strong> who is resp<strong>on</strong>sible, under the<br />

immediate authority <strong>of</strong> the director(s)/partner(s), for the <strong>in</strong>ternal management <strong>of</strong><br />

the body corporate or partnership at the time when the <strong>in</strong>fr<strong>in</strong>g<strong>in</strong>g act is d<strong>on</strong>e.<br />

The above pers<strong>on</strong>nel should be regarded as hav<strong>in</strong>g the overall resp<strong>on</strong>sibility for<br />

manag<strong>in</strong>g the use <strong>of</strong> copyright works <strong>in</strong> bus<strong>in</strong>ess even if they delegate the matters to<br />

other staff. Hence they should ma<strong>in</strong>ta<strong>in</strong> supervisi<strong>on</strong> even where delegati<strong>on</strong> is made.<br />

What defences are available to a director/partner charged with<br />

the <strong>of</strong>fence?<br />

When a director, par tner or any other pers<strong>on</strong> resp<strong>on</strong>sible for the <strong>in</strong>ternal<br />

management <strong>of</strong> the organisati<strong>on</strong> is charged with any <strong>of</strong> the aforesaid <strong>of</strong>fences under<br />

the Copyright Ord<strong>in</strong>ance, he or she may defend himself or herself by putt<strong>in</strong>g forward<br />

sufficient evidence to show that he or she did not authorise the <strong>in</strong>fr<strong>in</strong>g<strong>in</strong>g act.<br />

Evidence that could c<strong>on</strong>v<strong>in</strong>ce the court <strong>of</strong> either <strong>of</strong> the follow<strong>in</strong>g matters would be<br />

taken as “sufficient evidence” -<br />

• the defendant has caused the body corporate or partnership to set aside f<strong>in</strong>ancial<br />

resources and has directed the use <strong>of</strong> the resources for buy<strong>in</strong>g a sufficient number<br />

10

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!