Final Report of Uganda Intellectual Property ... - IPRsonline.org
Final Report of Uganda Intellectual Property ... - IPRsonline.org
Final Report of Uganda Intellectual Property ... - IPRsonline.org
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
x<br />
Mart Leesti and Tom Pengelly ― Technical and Financial Co-operation Needs for<br />
Implementation <strong>of</strong> the WTO TRIPS Agreement in <strong>Uganda</strong><br />
• Harmonized, predictable and transparent arrangements for programme funding, management and<br />
co-ordination by development partners, with emphasis on upgrading and utilizing the Government’s<br />
own public financial and procurement systems as far as possible.<br />
• Mechanisms for regular multi-partner joint reporting, review and evaluation <strong>of</strong> a common set <strong>of</strong><br />
expected results, impacts and outcomes, as opposed to multiple discrete systems which place a<br />
heavy and unnecessary burden on the lead government agencies.<br />
The detailed design development <strong>of</strong> such programmes in Sierra Leone and <strong>Uganda</strong> would require<br />
technical assistance and thorough consultations between Government, national stakeholders and the<br />
countries’ development partners. This would probably take at least 6-12 months to complete.<br />
For both countries, the starting point for programme development could be based on the Outline<br />
Programme Planning Matrix <strong>of</strong> strategic objectives, needs identified, main activities proposed to<br />
address these needs, lead agencies involved, provisional timings, and possible development partners,<br />
provided at Annex A <strong>of</strong> both <strong>of</strong> reports <strong>of</strong> the national needs assessment diagnostic studies.<br />
However, we note that the final decisions on when and how best to follow-up the reports <strong>of</strong> their needs<br />
assessment diagnostic studies, <strong>of</strong> course, rests with Sierra Leone and <strong>Uganda</strong>.<br />
A specific issue which each country will need to consider relates to their membership <strong>of</strong> the ARIPO<br />
system for patents, trademarks, industrial designs and copyright, and in particular both countries’<br />
present dependence upon ARIPO for most <strong>of</strong> their substantive patent examination functions. This<br />
therefore raises the question as to whether it would make sense for Sierra Leone and <strong>Uganda</strong>, as well<br />
as other ARIPO members, if an assessment <strong>of</strong> ARIPO’s needs for technical assistance and financial cooperation<br />
should be undertaken and implemented in parallel with their own national programmes.