06.03.2014 Views

Effect of steel plant effluent on acid and alkaline - Integrated ...

Effect of steel plant effluent on acid and alkaline - Integrated ...

Effect of steel plant effluent on acid and alkaline - Integrated ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

<str<strong>on</strong>g>Effect</str<strong>on</strong>g> <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> <str<strong>on</strong>g>steel</str<strong>on</strong>g> <str<strong>on</strong>g>plant</str<strong>on</strong>g> <str<strong>on</strong>g>effluent</str<strong>on</strong>g> <strong>on</strong> <strong>acid</strong> <strong>and</strong> <strong>alkaline</strong> phosphatases <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> gills, liver <strong>and</strong> g<strong>on</strong>ads <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> Cyprinus carpio<br />

Linn. (1758)<br />

Table 6: TWO WAY ANOVA: <str<strong>on</strong>g>Effect</str<strong>on</strong>g> <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> Effluent <strong>and</strong> Time <strong>on</strong> G<strong>on</strong>ads <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> Cyprinus carpio:<br />

Variables Factors F df p<br />

Acipase Activity<br />

Alkpase Activity<br />

Effluent C<strong>on</strong>centrati<strong>on</strong> (EC): 14.22 3,23 < 0.001<br />

Time: 5.27 2,23 < 0.05<br />

EC x Time: 5.89 6,23 < 0.01<br />

Effluent C<strong>on</strong>centrati<strong>on</strong> (EC): 14.23 3,23 < 0.001<br />

Time: 26.91 2,23 < 0.001<br />

EC x Time: 26.77 6,23 < 0.001<br />

3.1 Gills<br />

1. Alkaline phosphatase (Fig.1a &b)<br />

· E10(Effluent 10%)­An initial decline <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> 82.72 % compared from normal is shown in<br />

Alkpase in the first 48 hours, followed by a steep rise <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> 126% in 96 hours <strong>and</strong> drastically<br />

declining by 70.48% in 160 hours.<br />

· E20(Effluent 20%)­Shows an initial % decline <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> 80.34in 48 hours followed by a % hike<br />

<str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> 28.46 in 96 hours <strong>and</strong> 93.33 in 160 hours.<br />

· E30(Effluent 30%)­ Shows an initial % decline <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> 65.17 in 48 hours followed by a<br />

gradual decline by 71.54% in 96 hours , subsequently rising back to normal(100%) in<br />

160 hours.<br />

<str<strong>on</strong>g>Effect</str<strong>on</strong>g> <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> <str<strong>on</strong>g>effluent</str<strong>on</strong>g> c<strong>on</strong>centrati<strong>on</strong> <strong>on</strong> ALP <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> gill was found statistically n<strong>on</strong> significant by<br />

ANOVA. However, durati<strong>on</strong> <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> exposure (F=5.16; P

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!