Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
Voice of Rail Engineers<br />
Official Organ of<br />
INDIAN RAILWAYS TECHNICAL SUPERVISORS ASSOCIATION<br />
Vol – 1 No- 3 & 4 <strong>March</strong> - <strong>April</strong>, <strong>2008</strong> Price: Rs.10<br />
HUNDREDS OF ENGINEERS SIT ON DHARNA AGAINST PAY COMMISSION REPORT<br />
CANDLELIGHT PROCESSION AT JANTAR MANTAR BY IRTSA & AIREF<br />
SERIES OF MEETINGS WITH FM, RM, CRB & MS<br />
MEMO PRESENTED TO ALL CONCERNED MINISTERS & OFFICERS OF RAILWAY BOARD<br />
Hundreds of Engineers from all over Indian<br />
Railways, took out a candle light Procession at Jantar<br />
Mantar New Delhi, on <strong>April</strong> 21, 08, after a day long Joint<br />
Dharna by IRTSA & AIREF, in protest against the<br />
retrograde recommendations of the Sixth Central Pay<br />
Commission. Leaders of IRTSA & AIREF- including Er M.<br />
Shanmugam President IRTSA, Er Chowdhary President<br />
AIREF, Er Harchandan Singh General Secretary, IRTSA<br />
and Er AK Tyagi Secretary General AIREF and others<br />
addressed the Rally and strongly condemned the Report<br />
of Sixth CPC.<br />
Com. S. G Mishra, Asstt. General Secretary AIRF<br />
and Br. Raghvaiah, General Secretary NFIR also<br />
addressed the Rally and expressed their full support to<br />
the demands of the Engineers of the Railways and fully<br />
agreed that the Sixth Pay Commission had done great<br />
injustice to all sections of employees especially the<br />
Engineers and the technical staff at large.<br />
Earlier during the Day, the “<strong>March</strong> towards<br />
Parliament” by the them was interrupted by a large<br />
contingent of Delhi Police at the Parliament Street – with<br />
heavy barricades. However 5 of their representatives –<br />
led by Er. Harchandan Singh, General Secretary, IRTSA<br />
and Er AK Tyagi, Secretary General, AIREF, were<br />
allowed to proceed and present a memorandum at Prime<br />
Minister’s Office, PMO, followed by a prolonged meeting<br />
with Member Staff, Railway Board, Sh. S. S. Khurana,<br />
who is a Member of the Empowered Committee of<br />
Secretaries appointed by the Government to considered<br />
the Recommendations of the Sixth Pay Commission. The<br />
MS assured the delegation to do the needful to the extent<br />
possible.<br />
On <strong>April</strong> 22 nd , the Engineers gave a joint<br />
Demonstration at the residence of the Finance Minister<br />
and later at the residence of Railway Minister. This was<br />
followed by a two rounds of meetings with the Railway<br />
Minister, Sh Lalu Prasad Yadhav, Chairman Railway<br />
Board Sh Jaine and finally late night with the Finance<br />
Minister, Sh P. Chidambaram, at his residence. All of<br />
them assured the delegates to look into the issues raised<br />
by them.<br />
MAIN DEMANDS<br />
Following were the main demands raised in the<br />
Joint Memorandums presented to all concerned on behalf<br />
of IRTSA & AIREF, with detailed justification and a<br />
number of annexure:-<br />
1.A) Minimum pay of Rs 13000 for technical staff with<br />
one pay band of rs.13,000 – 1,50,000 for technical<br />
staff, instead of 4 pay bands.<br />
b) Minimum pay of Rs. 28000 for Junior Engineers &<br />
Rs. 45000 for section engineers and senior<br />
section engineers on Railways.<br />
c) Placing all JEs, SEs, SSEs and group ‘B’ in PB-3.<br />
d) Up-grading of Senior Section Engineers to<br />
equivalent of pre-revised scale of Rs. 10000-15200<br />
- as this grade has already been granted to jes<br />
with 15 to 20 years service on time scale basis in<br />
state services in UP, Bihar, Uttaranchal,<br />
Jharkhand / CPWD, MES<br />
2. Counting of DP for fixation of pay.<br />
3. Minimum annual increment of 5 % pa 4.a) Adequate<br />
rise of pay from one scale to the next.<br />
b) Grant of at least 4 increments on promotion.<br />
c) Merger of grade pay with pay scale after fitment<br />
in revised pay scales.<br />
5. Group ‘b’ gazetted status to all JEs., SEs. & SSEs.<br />
6. A) First class pass to all JEs. (Junior engineers) –<br />
at par with other departments,<br />
b) Inclusion of both father & mother in privilege<br />
pass - as for LTC in other departments.<br />
7. Time bound & time scale promotions from JE to JA<br />
grade (as in MES, telecom & CPWD)<br />
8. A) Incentive / arduous duty allowance to JEs., SEs.,<br />
SSES., CMT staff, other tech. Staff.<br />
b) Design / PCO / planning allowance to all<br />
Drawing & Design office staff.<br />
9. No Corporatisation of Railways.<br />
10. Exemption of all allowances from income tax.<br />
(See copy of Memorandum inside & Highlights of<br />
SCPC Report & Programme of Action on last Page)<br />
Previously Published as “THE RAIL SUPERVISOR”<br />
Editor -in- Chief, Er. Harchandan Singh, GS/IRTSA<br />
Central Head Quarter 32, Phase-6, Mohali, Chandigarh – 160055<br />
Email gsirtsa@yahoo.com Website www.irtsa.<strong>net</strong><br />
Chairman, Editorial Board, Er.M.Shanmugam, President / IRTSA<br />
ANNUAL SUBSCRIPTION: Rs.50<br />
“SUCCESS COMES TO THOSE WHO BELIEVE”
Voice of Rail Engineers Page – 2 <strong>March</strong> - <strong>April</strong>, <strong>2008</strong><br />
EDITORIAL<br />
SIXTH CENTRAL PAY COMMISSION REPORT<br />
WIDE & UNJUST VARIATIONS OF<br />
WAGE HIKES OF 15 TO 81 %<br />
Much awaited Report of the Sixth Central Pay<br />
Commission was submitted to the Government on<br />
<strong>March</strong> 24, <strong>2008</strong>, about a week before it was due, but<br />
over 2 years after it was required to be implemented.<br />
While the media hyped the proposed hike to be 40 %<br />
of Pay, the actual hike of emoluments turned out to be<br />
just about 15 to 20 % in most cases at lower & middle<br />
levels and as high as 60 to 81% at top levels. While<br />
most sections of the Civil and Defence personnel as<br />
well as Pensioners are highly dissatisfied and strongly<br />
protesting, the Government has set up an empowered<br />
Committee of Secretaries, to work out the modalities<br />
for implementation of the Report.<br />
The Report in itself is totally different from<br />
those of all the previous Pay Commissions, as it has<br />
brought in some very new concepts of 4 Running “Pay<br />
Bands” and 20 “Grade Pays” instead of the existing 34<br />
Pay Scales. This may to an extent reduce the<br />
stagnation amongst the employees. But difference in<br />
Grade Pay from one scale to the next is so meagre,<br />
the benefit - both in terms of money value and job<br />
satisfaction - would be negligible or rather negative not<br />
only on account of heavy inflation but more on account<br />
of insignificant pay rises as compared to other<br />
Sectors.<br />
The benefit of merger of DA has not been<br />
given both for fixation of Pay or Pension. The issue of<br />
increasing the Medical Allowance has been left for the<br />
Government to decide. Even the level of relief<br />
provided after the Fifth Pay Commission Report has<br />
not been maintained. Following are some of the major<br />
anomalies or rather areas of serious injustice and, as<br />
such, must be remedied by the Government before<br />
implementing the Report – which should in any case<br />
be done expeditiously.<br />
• Nominal hike of wages by only 15 to 28 % is totally<br />
unjust and insignificant as compared to over 300<br />
percent wage hike in corporate & private Sectors in<br />
the last ten years.<br />
• Non-counting of merger of dearness pay for Fixation<br />
of Pay, is totally unjustified.<br />
• Minimum Pay of Rs 5740 in scale -1S and Rs 6660<br />
in PB-1, are too low - being violative of the decision<br />
of the Hon’ble Supreme Court of India, as accepted<br />
by the Fifth CPC, to provide for social requirements.<br />
• Engineers / Technical Supervisors on Railways<br />
especially aggrieved to be placed in pay band PB-2<br />
- of Rupees 8700-34800; and for being treated worst<br />
than even the non-technical staff.<br />
• Senior Section Engineers unjustly singled out to<br />
have not been given any upgrading by SCPC.<br />
• Rates of Increments @ 2.5 % are too low and even<br />
lesser than existing annual rise<br />
• Grade pays are too low and their differentials do<br />
not reflect higher job requirements.<br />
• Grade pays also do not provide even the existing<br />
pay rise from one pay scale to the next Proposed<br />
Corporatisation of railways will jeopardize safety,<br />
efficiency and productivity on the Railways.<br />
• Disparity in Pension of Pre & Post 1.1.06<br />
Retirees.<br />
• Incoherence in Up-grading of Pay Scales with<br />
resultant impact on Pensions<br />
All these are very serious issues which are<br />
bound to have very adverse impact on the psyche of<br />
both the serving as well as the Retired employees.<br />
There is wide-spread resentment all over against the<br />
report of the Pay Commission. The extreme rise in<br />
prices is adding fuel to fire. Exodus from<br />
Government jobs has already started in every<br />
department – not only from the Defence Forces –<br />
which are a bit more vocal this time. This will further<br />
increase in a big way once the Government orders<br />
are out and if the Government does not remove the<br />
major flaws in the report, before implementing it<br />
soon. Talented and meritorious people are already<br />
not joining the Government jobs since long in view<br />
of greener pastures available elsewhere. Further<br />
exodus will not only adversely effect the efficiency of<br />
the Government services it will have very serious<br />
repercussions on the ongoing process of<br />
development of the nation and will retard the pace of<br />
economic growth – which has painstakingly been<br />
built up. It is also bound to seriously jeopardize the<br />
industrial peace.<br />
It is, therefore, earnestly hoped that the<br />
Government will give a serious and dispassionate<br />
thought to the whole matter – not merely for political<br />
reasons, which are not very far to see, but also from<br />
the point of view of justice to those who also serve<br />
the Nation in their own humble way, far from the<br />
sight of the public gaze, which only looks at the<br />
superficial layer of the corrupt elements, unmindful<br />
of millions of silent workers, engineers and many<br />
others who keep the wheels of the nation running –<br />
day in and day out.<br />
MAY JUSTICE PREVAIL! AMEN!<br />
– HCS<br />
Subscribers!<br />
Please renew your subscription in time<br />
Please send your subscription<br />
@ Rs 50 PA to:-<br />
K.V.Ramesh, Manager, VRE, G3-Likhit Homes,<br />
3-Lakshmanan Nagar West Street, Peravallur,<br />
Chennai- 600082. (Email – rameshirtsa@yahoo.co.in)
Voice of Rail Engineers Page – 3 <strong>March</strong> - <strong>April</strong>, <strong>2008</strong><br />
MEMORANDUM ON THE REPORT OF SIXTH PAY COMMISSION<br />
- ON THE PLIGHT OF ENGINEERS / TECHNICAL SUPERVISORS ON RAILWAYS<br />
- SUBMITTED BY IRTSA & AIREF ON 21 / 22.4.08 ON THE OCCASION OF JOINT DHARNA AT JANTAR MANTAR, NEW DELHI<br />
We would like to draw your kind attention to<br />
the sad plight of the over 50,000 Engineers /<br />
Technical Supervisors on the Indian Railways and<br />
the raw deal meted out to them by the Sixth Pay<br />
Commission – compelling hundreds of Engineers /<br />
Technical Supervisors from all over India to hold a<br />
Dharna at Jantar Mantar.<br />
1.A) i) MINIMUM PAY OF RS 13000 FOR TECHNICAL<br />
STAFF<br />
II) ONE PAY BAND OF RS.13,000 – 1,50,000 FOR<br />
TECHNICAL STAFF – INSTEAD OF 4 PAY BANDS.<br />
a) While computing the Minimum Wages, Sixth<br />
Pay Commission has ignored the actual market<br />
conditions, retail prices as well as the factors of Social<br />
obligations upheld by the Supreme Court of India and<br />
accepted by the Fifth CPC. It also ignored a reliable<br />
formula of % age Rise of Net National Product adopted<br />
by the Fifth Pay Commission.<br />
Fifth Pay Commission worked out and adopted<br />
the Multiple Factor of 3.25 % based on % age rise of NNP<br />
(Net National Product ). But it also erred by calculating<br />
the rise of NNP over 9 years instead of 10 years since<br />
Fourth CPC, for fixing up the Pay Scales at all levels.<br />
The Sixth Pay Commission did not adopt any<br />
norms or formula nor did it adopt any scientific criteria for<br />
Fixing the salaries at various levels. Consequently the<br />
rise given at various levels is also very erratic and widely<br />
different at each level – as would be apparent from<br />
Annexure I A & I B.<br />
The ratio corresponding to minimum of scales is<br />
widely varying from 1.61 to 3.37 and %age increase of<br />
wages also widely vary and not only reflect partial<br />
treatment but also an erratic approach of the Sixth CPC,<br />
which is bound to cause great resentment and heart burn.<br />
The % age rise of NNP over the last 11 years<br />
since 1994-95, the Compensation Factor works out to be<br />
164.62 % on Current Prices as on 1.1.06 . Accordingly<br />
the Minimum salary should be Rs 12500 and the<br />
Maximum salary should be Rs 1,50,000, based on rise of<br />
164.62% of NNP.<br />
Minimum wage as per above stated norms, works<br />
out to be Rs 12500 for the Non-Technical Staff, instead of<br />
Rs 6660 proposed by Sixth CPC. Accordingly the<br />
Minimum wage for Technical Staff should be at least one<br />
grade higher i.e. Rs !3,000, keeping in view their higher<br />
and more onerous job requirements and more onerous<br />
work environments etc.<br />
ii) It further requested that there should be only one Pay<br />
Band of Rs.13,000 – 1,50,000 for Technical Staff –<br />
instead of 4 Pay Bands. Since the Maximum Salary as<br />
proposed above, works out to be above Rs 1,00,000, it is<br />
proposed that the Pay of the President of India and other<br />
Constitutional heads, be revised to over Rs 1.5 lakhs.<br />
1.B) MINIMUM PAY OF RS. 28000 FOR JUNIOR<br />
ENGINEERS & RS. 45000 FOR SECTION ENGINEERS &<br />
SENIOR SECTION ENGINEERS ON RAILWAYS.<br />
i) Fifth CPC had wrongly applied the multiple factor<br />
of 3.25, based on rise of NNP by 30.9% for 9 years,<br />
instead of 38.6 % for 10 years, and wrongly calculated<br />
the multiple factor as 3.25 instead of 4.05.<br />
ii) Multiple Factor of 4.92 should be applied as ratio<br />
between Proposed & Existing Fifth CPC Minimum Pay, as<br />
per details mentioned in Annexure II.<br />
iii) Higher duties, responsibilities & job requirements<br />
of Technical Staff, especially on Railways;<br />
iv) Comparative Pay Scales and emoluments of the<br />
counterparts in P.S.Us. with similar duties, responsibilities<br />
and job requirements.<br />
v) Additional training after recruitment of Diploma<br />
Holders as JEs<br />
vi) Additional training after recruitment of BEs -<br />
Degree Holders as SEs.<br />
vii) SCPC has recommended up-gradation of SE to<br />
SSE scale In chapter 3.8, page 221 and Para 7.36.77<br />
Page 530 & 531 of its report.<br />
1.C) (i) UP-GRADING OF JEs TO EQUIVALENT OF PRE-<br />
REVISED SCALE OF RS.7450- 11500<br />
(ii) UP-GRADING OF SSE TO EQUIVALENT OF PRE-<br />
REVISED SCALE OF RS. 10000-15200.<br />
No consideration has been given by Sixth CPC to<br />
the onerous nature of Duties and Responsibilities of<br />
Engineers / Technical Supervisor - which have increased<br />
manifold and become more onerous especially due to<br />
modernization on the Railways, indiscriminate shrinking<br />
of staff strength and numerous other factors.<br />
Staff Nurse in grade of Rs 5000-8000 are proposed to be<br />
placed in pre-revised scale of Rs.7450-11500. Similarly,<br />
Nursing Sisters in Scale Rs 5500-9000 are proposed to<br />
be placed in the pre-revised Scale of Rs 7500-12000.<br />
Entry qualification for both the Nursing Staff and JEs are<br />
3 Years Diploma in their respective disciplines and both<br />
also have to undergo a training of one and a half year<br />
followed by examination before absorption. Job<br />
requirements of J.Es. S.Es. and SSEs. are equally<br />
onerous and demanding to ensure safety and efficiency<br />
on the Railways, where one single mistake can endanger<br />
not one, but thousand lives<br />
If the proposals of Sixth CPC are implemented,<br />
there would be a negative growth of salary of especially<br />
the Senior Section Engineers in scale S-13 (as apparent<br />
from Annexure I C).<br />
It is, therefore, requested that:-<br />
(i) JEs (Junior Engineers) in existing scales of Rs<br />
5000-8000 and 5500-9000 may be allotted pay scale<br />
equivalent to the pre-revised scale of Rs 7450-11500 in<br />
view of their qualification and job requirements.<br />
(ii) Senior Section Engineers in scale Rs 7450-11500,<br />
may please be upgraded and placed in the equivalent<br />
scale of Rs 10000-15200 in consideration of their job<br />
requirements and long experience – both of which have<br />
not been considered by the SCPC particularly in view of<br />
the fact that the Pay scale of Rs 10000-15200 has<br />
already been granted to JEs with 15 to 24 years service<br />
on time scale basis in state government service in UP,<br />
Bihar, Uttaranchal, Jharkhand / C.P.W.D. / M.E.S. etc<br />
(Continued)
Voice of Rail Engineers Page – 4 <strong>March</strong> - <strong>April</strong>, <strong>2008</strong><br />
MEMORANDUM ON THE REPORT OF SCPC<br />
(Contd)<br />
1.D) PLACING SECTION ENGINEERS (SEs) & SENIOR<br />
SECTION ENGINEERS (SSEs)& GROUP ‘B’IN PB-3.<br />
Sixth CPC has greatly erred in placing the Section<br />
Engineers & Senior Section Engineers in PB-2. Section<br />
Engineers (SEs) (scale Rs 6500-10500) are recruited on<br />
the Railways with Engineering Degree as qualifications<br />
and one year on the job training or are promoted to that<br />
post after long years of service experience as Junior<br />
Engineers who are themselves having Engineering<br />
Diploma as qualification and one & half years of on the<br />
job training. Section Engineers (scale Rs 6500-10500) &<br />
Senior Section Engineers (scale Rs 7450-11500) are<br />
‘Spot” or “Field” Managers - directly managing production,<br />
planning, quality control, safety, efficiency and effective<br />
execution of administrative polices and targets in the field<br />
and on the shop floor, shed or depot, being directly<br />
responsible for round the clock management of the<br />
system against all odds, constraints, shortage of staff and<br />
material resources as well as vagaries of nature.<br />
Assistant Nursing Superintendents (scale Rs<br />
6500-10500), Deputy Nursing Superintends (scale Rs<br />
7500-12000) have all been placed in PB-3. There is no<br />
justification for placing the SE, SSE and Group B officers<br />
in PB-2. It is requested that either the proposal of having<br />
4 Pay Bands be totally scrapped or else Section<br />
Engineers (scale Rs 6500-10500) & Senior Section<br />
Engineers (scale Rs 7450-11500) and Group B Officers<br />
on the Railways be placed in PB-3.<br />
2. COUNTING OF DP FOR FIXATION OF PAY<br />
Dearness Pay has all along been counted for all<br />
purposes including fixation of Pay in the Revised scales<br />
of pay after every Pay Commission. The Sixth Pay<br />
Commission could not be an exception for any reason<br />
whatsoever as it would not be justified to ignore this<br />
element for fixation of pay. It is therefore requested that<br />
DP (Dearness Pay) may please be counted for all<br />
purposes including fixation of Pay etc.<br />
3. MINIMUM ANNUAL INCREMENT OF 5 % PA<br />
(INSTEAD OF 2.5 %).<br />
Rate of increment is much higher in most of the PSUs<br />
and private sector. The rate of Increment should be such<br />
so as to provide adequate motivation and incentive for<br />
maintaining the level of efficiency and commitment. It<br />
should be atleast 5 % of Pay to adequately meet the<br />
increasing mo<strong>net</strong>ary requirements and growing family<br />
and social liabilities as well as to compensate for<br />
improved skill and efficiency on account of experience.<br />
4a) ADEQUATE RISE OF PAY FROM ONE SCALE TO THE<br />
NEXT.<br />
4b) GRANT OF AT LEAST 4 INCREMENTS ON PROMOTION.<br />
4c) MERGER OF GRADE PAY WITH PAY SCALE AFTER<br />
FITMENT IN THE REVISED SCALES.<br />
Sixth Pay Commission has killed all charm &<br />
incentive on promotion from one scale or post to the next<br />
by reducing the margin between the minimum of two<br />
subsequent grade to just Rs 400 in PB-2 (in the shape of<br />
so called Grade Pay) from the existing level of Rs 500 of<br />
JE-II (Rs 5000-8000) & JE–I (Rs 5500-9000) and of Rs<br />
1000 between the subsequent existing scales of Rs 6500-<br />
10500 and above.<br />
This is totally unjustified, illogical and irrational and bound<br />
to cause much frustration. It is therefore requested that<br />
concept of Grade Pay should be rejected and proper<br />
rational Pay scales be formed with adequate rise from the<br />
minimum of one to that of the next which should not be<br />
less than at least thrice the existing level or the existing<br />
differential be multiplied with the compensatory factor<br />
based on the rise of NNP (Net National Product) as was<br />
done by the Fifth Pay Commission.<br />
5. GROUP ‘B’ GAZETTED STATUS TO ALL J.Es., SEs.<br />
& SSEs.<br />
All the previous three Pay Commissions had<br />
recommended for classification of the Pay Scales of<br />
senior Technical Supervisors to be classified in Group B<br />
and the Government had also accepted the<br />
recommendations in this regard, except in case of Fifth<br />
Pay Commission where in the Government had modified<br />
the recommendations (as per details in Annexure III. But<br />
the Railways did not implement any of the orders issued<br />
after any of the 3 Pay Commissions.<br />
Sixth Pay Commission has clubbed all the<br />
existing scales of Technical Supervisors (JEs, SEs, SSEs<br />
/ CMS/ DMS) in existing scales of Rs 5000-8000, Rs<br />
5500-9000, Rs 6500-10500, Rs 7450-11500, and Group<br />
B in existing scales of Rs 7500-12000 and 8000- 13500,<br />
in PB-2. Since the nature of job in all these scales<br />
requires supervision and management, it is requested<br />
that these posts be classified in Group B gazetted . as<br />
has already been done in other Central Government<br />
Departments as well as in most other State Government<br />
services (as per details in Annexure III).<br />
6a) 2 AC CLASS PASS TO ALL JUNIOR ENGINEERS –<br />
ON PAR WITH OTHER DEPARTMENTS,<br />
SCPC (vide Para- 4.2.30 page 236) has recommended<br />
that the travel entitlement of posts carrying Grade Pay<br />
from Rs.4200 to 4800 should be in AC-II tier by train while<br />
on Tour and Transfer. It is requested that this<br />
recommendation of the SCPC be implemented on the<br />
Railways as already existing in other Central Government<br />
Departments<br />
6b) INCLUSION OF BOTH FATHER & MOTHER IN<br />
PRIVILEGE PASS<br />
It is requested that in view of the social<br />
obligations and bonding in India, both the Parents (Father<br />
and Mother) whereever dependent on a Railway<br />
employee – due to their old age and low level of income,<br />
be allowed to be included in the Privilege Pass and the<br />
definition of dependent be amended accordingly.<br />
7. TIME BOUND / TIME SCALE PROMOTIONS FROM JE TO<br />
JA GRADE – AS IN THE CASE OF MES, TELECOM &<br />
CPWD:-<br />
Regular promotions at fixed and specified intervals are<br />
very essential for effective motivation and efficiency with<br />
sustained growth. Time bound and Time Scale<br />
Promotions are there not only in the Defence Services but<br />
also in the Officers Cadres in Civil Services and the<br />
Railways.<br />
These have also been adopted for the Junior Engineers<br />
in CPWD, MES and Telecom Department<br />
These have also been implemented for JEs in most of<br />
the States (as per details in Annexure III). But the JEs,<br />
SEs and SSEs continue to rot in these scales throughout<br />
their careers and get highly demoralized and frustrated<br />
with ACP providing no real relief as per their job<br />
requirements. It is requested that Time Bound and Time<br />
Scale Promotions be granted to Engineers, Technical<br />
Supervisors on Railways<br />
(Continued)
Voice of Rail Engineers Page –5 <strong>March</strong> - <strong>April</strong>, <strong>2008</strong><br />
MEMORANDUM ON THE REPORT OF SCPC<br />
(Contd)<br />
8. A) INCENTIVE / ARDUOUS DUTY ALLOWANCE TO<br />
J.Es, SEs, SSEs, CMT & DMS STAFF ETC.<br />
All these staff are required to work in hazarduous<br />
environments and arduous environments – exposed to<br />
vagaries of nature and constant threat to their personal<br />
safety, ensure time bound execution of work and punctual<br />
running of trains/ maintaining outturn targets, without respite<br />
from exposures. It is therefore requested that J.Es, SEs,<br />
SSEs, CMT & DMS STAFF may please be granted Arduous<br />
Duty Allowance.<br />
8.B) PCO / Design / Planning Allowance for Drawing /<br />
Design Engineers<br />
Drawing is the language of Engineers and design<br />
has main role in execution of any work. No engineering<br />
project can be imagined without Drawing /Design. Design<br />
and planning allowance is denied by SCPC on one side, for<br />
the Subordinate Engineers and recommended doubling of<br />
the same for the officer attached to design organization, on<br />
the other. Drawing / Design Engineers are having vital role<br />
in planning and designing and have same justification. It is<br />
requested that PCO/ Planning / Designing Allowances be<br />
extended to JEs, SEs, SSEs & AEs of Drawing / Design<br />
cadre as for the technical officers in these sections / offices.<br />
9. NO CORPORATISATION OF RAILWAYS.<br />
The Pay Commission, while recommending<br />
Corporatisation of the Railways (vide Para 7.36.99 to 103),<br />
has not taken note of the fact that while most of the central<br />
PSUs like Air India etc. are sinking deeper in losses, a<br />
profitable Government entity like Indian Railways is<br />
improving its financial performance year after year. It is<br />
requested that the Railways should not be Corporatised. On<br />
the other hand a separate Wage Board be set up to review<br />
and decide the Wage structure of Railway men in view of<br />
special working conditions, separate Budgetary provision<br />
and the role Railways play in the development of Nation.<br />
10. EXEMPTION OF ALL ALLOWANCES FROM INCOME TAX<br />
Allowances (like DA, CCA, HRA etc) are not exactly<br />
income but only compensations for maintaining the real<br />
income. Fifth Pay Commission had strongly recommended<br />
for exempting all such Allowances from Income Tax (vide<br />
Para 167.8 & 167.9 of its Report) to exempt these<br />
Allowances from Income Tax, to avoid erosion of the wages<br />
recommended by it. But the Government had so far not<br />
accepted this recommendation of Fifth CPC. Sixth CPC has<br />
not reflected on this issue. It is requested that the<br />
recommendations of Fifth CPC be implemented and all<br />
allowances be exempted under section 195 of the Income<br />
Tax Act.<br />
FOR FURTHER DETAILS &<br />
TEXT OF PAY COMMISSION REPORT<br />
ALONG WITH ITS ANNEXURES<br />
FIXATION TABLES, AND MANY OTHER<br />
FEATURES<br />
VISIT REGULARLY OUR WEBSITE<br />
www.irtsa.<strong>net</strong><br />
ACCEPTANCE / IMPLEMENTATION<br />
ORDERS OF THE GOVERNMENT ON<br />
SCPC REPORT<br />
SHALL BE PLACED ON THE WEBSITE<br />
AS SOON AS RELEASED<br />
MIDNIGHT CANDLELIGHT AGITATION<br />
IN FRONT OF TRICHY JUNCTION<br />
On 7 th <strong>March</strong>, IRTSA conducted MIDNIGHT<br />
CANDLELIGHT AGITATION in front of Trichy Junction,<br />
Southern Railway, was held by IRTSA, to highlight the<br />
growing frustrations among the supervising Engineers.<br />
Supervisors from ICF, SCR and all subunits of Southern<br />
Railway participated. Er.M.Shanmugam, Central<br />
President lead the agitation. Er.Tamilmaran, VP/IRTSA,<br />
Er.K.V.Ramesh, ACT/IRTSA Er.Muthiaha,<br />
Div,Secretary/Madurai, Er.Ilangovan, Div.President<br />
/Salem, Er.C.Mani, SU.Secy/ Podanur, Er. K.Gobinath,<br />
AGS, Er.Thirumaran, Secretary/GOC and many others<br />
spoke on the agitation. All the speakers pressed on the<br />
main demands of IRTSA like revised pay scales as<br />
demanded in IRTSA memorandum to the Sixth CPC, First<br />
class pass to all JEs, Gazetted status to SSEs & SEs,<br />
Incentive/Special pay to Open Line Engineers, Design<br />
allowance to Design & Drawing Engineers, revision of<br />
incentive rates in Production units and Workshops etc.<br />
IRTSA CONDUCTS SEMINAR<br />
TO IMPROVE SALEM DIVISION<br />
On 7 th march, <strong>2008</strong> IRTSA conducted seminar to<br />
improve Salem division, the youngest division of Indian<br />
Railways. Salem Mayor Smt.Rekha Priyadarshini<br />
inaugurated the seminar. Sri.Raja, MLA gave the<br />
valedictory address. In their address both Mayor and the<br />
MLA appreciated the efforts taken by IRTSA and its<br />
President M.Shanmugam for organizing the seminar which<br />
has so much of local importance. In his power point<br />
presentation Er.Shanmugam explained about the<br />
suggestions given by IRTSA including introduction of new<br />
trains and new rail routes for the Salem division. He also<br />
proposed a Metro Rail system for Salem city. Earlier<br />
Er.Tamilmaran, Vice President/IRTSA gave the welcome<br />
address. Sri.A.Swaminathan, President, All Bharat<br />
Confederation of Senior Citizens and Pensioners and<br />
Er.Balaraman, President, Diploma Engineers Association,<br />
Tamilnadu were among those who spoke on the occasion.<br />
Press and Visual media gave wide spread coverage<br />
for the seminar. At the end of the programme a press meet<br />
was also conducted by President M.Shanmugam.<br />
CENTRAL PRESIDENT INAUGURATES IRTSA<br />
UNIT AT SALEM DIVISION<br />
Central President M.Shanmugam inaugurated the<br />
IRTSA unit in Salem division on 7 th march, <strong>2008</strong>.<br />
Engineers from ICF and Southern Railway participated in<br />
large numbers. Earlier in the afternoon Central President<br />
held a meeting at Salem divisional office.<br />
New office bearers of Salem Divisional Unit<br />
Er.Ilangovan<br />
- Divisional President<br />
Er.JayaRaj<br />
- Divisional Vice President<br />
Er.N.Baskar<br />
- Divisional Secretary<br />
Er.K.Dhaksinamurthy - Zonal Treasurer<br />
Er.Ranjit Singh - Zonal Org. Secretary<br />
Office Bearers of Salem Sub unit<br />
Er.Rajasekar (S&T) - Sub unit President<br />
Er.Ranjit Singh (C&W) - Sub unit Working president<br />
Er.Govindraj (TRD) - Sub unit Secretary<br />
Er.Radhakrishnan (C&W)- Sub unit Treasurer<br />
Er.Radha (TRD) - Sub unit Joint Secretary<br />
Er.Periyasamy (C&W) - Sub unit org.Secretary<br />
Er.Jacob Vargesh (S&T)- Sub unit org. Secretary<br />
Er.Arumugam (TRD) - Sub unit Org.Secretary<br />
At the end of the meeting Er.Abdul Salam, Zonal<br />
Secretary, S.Rly wished all the office bearers best of luck<br />
and requested them to work to the best of their ability.
Voice of Rail Engineers Page – 6 <strong>March</strong> - <strong>April</strong>, <strong>2008</strong><br />
MEMORANDUM TO DIRECTOR DOP (PW)<br />
ON PENSIONARY BENEFITS<br />
FROM HARCHANDAN SINGH, SECRETARY, RSCWS<br />
(RAILWAY SENIOR CITIZENS WELFARE SOCIETY)<br />
In response to DOP (Pension & Pensioners Welfare)<br />
Memo No.38/35/<strong>2008</strong> P&PW(A) dated 17/04/<strong>2008</strong><br />
We would like to draw the attention of the<br />
Department of Pension & Pensioners Welfare, Government<br />
of India, towards the following points which need to be<br />
addressed to by the authorities while finalizing the<br />
implementation of the recommendations of the Sixth Central<br />
Pay Commission pertaining to the existing pensioners:<br />
1. DISPARITY IN PENSION OF PRE AND POST 1-1-2006<br />
CATEGORIES<br />
There will be a wide variation between the pensions<br />
in cases of Pre & Post 1-1-06 Retirees, even though they<br />
belong to the same Pay Band in both cases of retirees. As<br />
per Para 5.1.47 of the 6 th PC report, the pension of the pre<br />
1-1-06 retirees is to be fixed as per Fitment Table (Annex<br />
5.1.1) subject to the provision that the revised Pension shall<br />
in no case be lower than 50% of the sum of the minimum of<br />
the pay in the pay band and the grade pay thereon<br />
corresponding to the pre-revised pay scale from which the<br />
pensioner had retired. (Pay fixation of the serving<br />
employees in the revised running pay bands has been<br />
given in Table 2.2.2 of the report).<br />
The enclosed table (Table I) shows the comparison<br />
of the pension for all the existing scales from S-4 to S-34<br />
(Pay Bands PB-2 to PB-4), in cases of Pre & Post 1-1-06<br />
Retirees, even though they belong to the same Pay Band in<br />
both the cases of retirees. It would be seen that there is a<br />
wide variation between the pensions although the parent<br />
pay band is the same in both cases of retirees. A very<br />
anomalous situation arises because a person retiring on<br />
31 st Dec. 2005 gets a lower pension than his counterpart<br />
retiring at the initial stage of the same scale a month later.<br />
Justice demands that there should be no difference in<br />
pension when the same pay band is applicable in both the<br />
cases. It will be appreciated that this inequality in pension<br />
needs to be removed as else it would be a great injustice to<br />
past pensioners and shall be a violation of laws of natural<br />
justice (as held by the Hon’ble Supreme Court of India in<br />
Nakara’s Case.<br />
2. INCOHERENCE IN UPGRADATION OF PAY SCALES<br />
WITH RESULTANT EFFECT ON PENSIONS<br />
Combining of the existing 34 scales into four pay bands and<br />
grade pay has given rise to many incongruent situations as<br />
mentioned below: i) Ratio between the 5 th PC scales and<br />
the new pay bands (both taken at the minimum level) is<br />
very erratic varying from 1.46 to 3.37 which will be evident<br />
from the enclosed table (Table II). Not only that, but also<br />
there is wide variation within the same pay band. This<br />
variation is 1.70 to 2.42 for PB 1, 1.61 to 2.58 for PB 2, 1.46<br />
to 2.63 for PB 3 and 2.17 to 3.37 for PB 4. There is no<br />
justification for such huge variations within either between<br />
the 4 Bands or within each Band especially if the intention<br />
behind the Band is to group personnel who are manning the<br />
posts of almost equal responsibility. A uniform ratio of 3.3<br />
with plus minus variation of about 10% was adopted by 5 th<br />
CPC while upgrading the scales of 4 th CPC. The haphazard<br />
ratio, adopted by the Sixth CPC, in up-gradation of scales is<br />
resulting into a wide variation of increase in pay fixation of<br />
various scales with consequential effect on pensions.<br />
This will be clear from the enclosed table of pay<br />
fixation(Table III) Percentage increase in the pay over<br />
what was drawn on 1-1-06 is reflected in the last col. and<br />
the variation is from 21.02 % to 81.22 %. Such a huge<br />
inequality is unheard of.<br />
ii) For the past pensioners having a choice of selecting<br />
better of the pensions as per fitment table (Annex 5.1.1)<br />
or 50 % of the new pay bands with grade pay, a table<br />
(Table IV) is enclosed for all the pay scales. The<br />
beneficial pension is indicated in bold figures. It would be<br />
seen that increase in pension is just 15.1 % in most of the<br />
cases as the new pay bands give a lower pension in their<br />
case. Where-ever pension is more on the basis of pay<br />
bands, there also is a wide variation in percentage<br />
increase. In one case of scale S-28, the increase in<br />
pension is of the order of 81.2 %. What is the justification<br />
for such a vast variation is any body’s guess?<br />
This huge variations in revised pay as well as pension,<br />
needs to be remedied in the interest of justice and to<br />
avoid serious heart burning amongst the majority of the<br />
employees as well as the Pensioners.<br />
3. NEED FOR INCREASED PENSION FOR OLDER<br />
PENSIONERS : In Para 5.1.32 of the report, the<br />
Commission has considered the need for increased<br />
pension for older pensioners. But the threshold age of 80<br />
years for this benefit is too late in the evening of<br />
pensioners. The span of residual life left after<br />
superannuation is greatly influenced by the post retiral<br />
tensions arising out of health and economic problems and<br />
very few may be lucky to receive the benefit granted after<br />
the age of 80 years. It is, therefore, urged that the<br />
pension be increased by 5 % for every five years starting<br />
from the age of 65 years, by 10 % after 70 years and 15<br />
% after 75 years of age as is the case in some of the<br />
States which are already granting such increase in<br />
pensions. With this it will be 20 % at 80 years and there<br />
onwards as recommended by the Pay Commission.<br />
4. UNJUST EXCLUSION OF ‘EFFECT OF MERGER OF<br />
50% DEARNESS ALLOWANCE’<br />
The Pay Commission has unjustly proposed ‘exclusion of<br />
effect of merger of 50% Dearness Allowance’ for fitment<br />
of revised Pension of Existing Pensioners. This defeats<br />
the very purpose of merging the Dearness Allowance. It is<br />
therefore requested that not only the entire amount of 74<br />
% Dearness Allowance (as on 1.1.06) but rather the 50 %<br />
merged portion of DA with 24 % DA thereon, should be<br />
Counted for the fitment of Pension.<br />
5. GRANT OF INTERIM RELIEF<br />
The setting up and consequently the Report of the Sixth<br />
Pay Commission had been greatly delayed causing much<br />
suffering to the Pensioners. Processing and<br />
implementation of the final orders are bound to take time.<br />
It is therefore requested that an Interim Relief of at least<br />
40% of the Pension be granted early w.e.f. 1.1.2006, to<br />
all existing Pensioners.<br />
ENGINEERS !<br />
BE AN ACTIVE MEMBER OF IRTSA<br />
PAY YOUR SUBSCRIPTION & ALL OTHER DUES -<br />
REGULARLY & VOLUNTARILY<br />
CONTRIBUTE LIBERALLY<br />
TO THE STRUGGLE FUND<br />
ATTEND ALL MEETINGS & PROGRAMMES<br />
DON’T BE JUST A CRITIC – ALWAYS GIVE<br />
CONSTRUCTIVE SUGGESTIONS<br />
YOUR ACTIVE COOPERATION IS VITAL<br />
FOR THE SUCCESS OF THE CAUSE
Voice of Rail Engineers Page – 7 <strong>March</strong> - <strong>April</strong>, <strong>2008</strong><br />
PENSIONERS FORUM<br />
FIXATION OF PENSION OF EXISTING PENSIONERS<br />
Extracts of Report of Sixth Central Pay Commission. (Page 338, Volume I)<br />
5.1.47 Fitment benefit to the past pensioners- The Commission notes that modified parity has already<br />
been conceded between pre and post 1/1/1996 pensioners. Further, full neutralization of price rise on or after<br />
1/1/1996 has also been extended to all the pensioners. Accordingly, no further changes in the extent rules are<br />
necessary. However, in order to maintain the existing modified parity between present and future retirees, it will be<br />
necessary to allow the same fitment benefit as is being recommended for the existing Government employees. The<br />
Commission, accordingly, recommends that all past pensioners should be allowed fitment benefit equal to<br />
40% of the pension excluding the effect of merger of 50% dearness allowance/ dearness relief as pension (in<br />
respect of pensioners retiring on or after 1/4/2004) and dearness pension (for other pensioners) respectively.<br />
The increase will be allowed by subsuming the effect of conversion of 50% of dearness relief/ dearness<br />
allowance as dearness pension/dearness pay. Consequently, dearness relief at the rate of 74% on pension<br />
(excluding the effect of merger) has been taken for the purposes of computing revised pension as on<br />
1/1/2006. This is consistent with the fitment benefit being allowed in case of the existing employees. A table (Annex<br />
5.1.1) showing fixation of the pension of the existing pensioners in the revised dispensation consequent to<br />
implementation of the recommendations of this Commission has been prepared and should be used for<br />
fixing the revised pension of the existing pensioners.<br />
The fixation as per this table will be subject to the provision that the revised<br />
pension, in no case, shall be lower than fifty percent of the sum of the minimum of<br />
the pay in the pay band and the grade pay thereon corresponding to the pre-revised pay<br />
scale from which the pensioner had retired. To this extent, a change would need to be<br />
allowed from the fitment table (Please see Revised Pension Fitment Table on next Page}<br />
REVISED PENSION FITMENT TABLE – AT A GLANCE<br />
Extracts of (Volume II) Annexure 5.1.1, Page 87 to 254<br />
Prerevised<br />
Pension+<br />
DP * on<br />
1.1,06<br />
Revised<br />
Pension<br />
As per<br />
Annex.<br />
5.1.1<br />
Prerevised<br />
Pension+<br />
DP * on<br />
1.1,06<br />
Revised<br />
Pension<br />
As per<br />
Annex.<br />
5.1.1<br />
Prerevised<br />
Pension<br />
DP * on<br />
1.1,06<br />
Revised<br />
Pension<br />
As per<br />
Annex.<br />
5.1.1<br />
Prerevised<br />
Pension<br />
DP * on<br />
1.1,06<br />
Revised<br />
Pension As<br />
per<br />
Annex.5.1.1<br />
1913 3330 4500 6420 7100 10129 9700 13839<br />
2000 3330 4600 6563 7200 10272 9800 13981<br />
2100 3330 4700 6705 7300 10415 9900 14124<br />
2200 3330 4800 6848 7400 10557 10000 14267<br />
2300 3330 4900 6991 7500 10700 10500 14980<br />
2400 3424 5000 7133 7600 10843 11000 15693<br />
2500 3567 5100 7276 7700 10985 11500 16407<br />
2600 3709 5200 7419 7800 11128 12000 17120<br />
2700 3852 5300 7561 7900 11271 12500 17833<br />
2800 3995 5400 7704 8000 11413 13000 18547<br />
2900 4137 5500 7847 8100 11556 13500 19260<br />
3000 4280 5600 7989 8200 11699 14000 19973<br />
3100 4423 5700 8132 8300 11841 14500 20687<br />
3200 4565 5800 8275 8400 11984 15000 21400<br />
3300 4708 5900 8417 8500 12127 15500 22113<br />
3400 4851 6000 8560 8600 12269 16000 22827<br />
3500 4993 6100 8703 8700 12412 16500 23540<br />
3600 5136 6200 8845 8800 12555 17000 24253<br />
3700 5279 6300 8988 8900 12697 17500 24967<br />
3800 5421 6400 9131 9000 12840 18000 25680<br />
3900 5564 6500 9273 9100 12983 18500 26393<br />
4000 5707 6600 9416 9200 13125 19000 27107<br />
4100 5849 6700 9559 9300 13268 22500 32100<br />
4200 5992 6800 9701 9400 13411<br />
4300 6135 6900 9844 9500 13553<br />
4400 6277 7000 9987 9600 13696<br />
• DP (Dearness Pension) in case of pre 1.4.2004 pensioners.<br />
• For post 31.3.2004 pensioners, DP is included in pension .<br />
** Revised DA from 1.1.06 = 0 %, from 1.7.06 = 2%, from 1.1.07 = 6 %, from 1.7.07 = 9% and 1.1.08 = 12 %<br />
*** Fixation shall not be less than 50% of minimum of pay in the new pay band and the grade pay.
Voice of Rail Engineers Page – 8 <strong>March</strong> - <strong>April</strong>, <strong>2008</strong><br />
Table IV- WIDE VARIATION OF % AGE INCREASE OF PENSION<br />
A B C D E F G H I J<br />
Pensio Fitment %age Pension Increase in Pension @ Increase in %age<br />
n Pens. incre drawn Pension as 50% of min. Pension Increase<br />
(50%of as per ase on on 1-1-06 of New Pay w.r.t. to with<br />
min. of 6th PC col 1-1-06 as per<br />
Bands with New Pay fitment<br />
Fitment<br />
scale)+ Table B to with<br />
Table(C-E)<br />
Grade Pay Bands table-<br />
50% DA 5.1.1 C 24% DA<br />
(Col G-E) (Col C&E)<br />
Existing Pay<br />
Scales as per 5th<br />
PC<br />
S-9 (5000-8000)<br />
S-10 (5500-9000)<br />
S-11 (6500-10500)<br />
%age<br />
Increase<br />
with New<br />
Pay Band<br />
(Col G&E)<br />
P B 2<br />
3750 5350 42.67 4650 700 6450 1800 15.1 38.7<br />
4125 5885 42.67 5115 770 6450 1335 15.1 26.1<br />
4875 6955 42.67 6045 910 6450 405 15.1 6.7<br />
S-12 (6500-6900) 5587 7971 42.67 6927 1043.12 6650 -277 15.1 -4.0<br />
S-13 (7450-11500) 5625 8025 42.67 6975 1050 6750 -225 15.1 -3.2<br />
S-14 7500-12000) 5625 8025 42.67 6975 1050 6750 (-) 225 15.1 (-) 3.2<br />
S-15 (8000-13500) 6000 8560 42.67 7440 1120 7050 (-) 390 15.1 (-) 5.2<br />
New scale-(Gr A<br />
entry)(8000-13500)<br />
S-16,17(9000,<br />
9000-9550)<br />
S-18 10325-<br />
10975(SS)<br />
S-19 (10000-<br />
15200)<br />
S-20 10650-15850)<br />
S-21 (12000-<br />
16500) (JAG)<br />
S-22 (12750-<br />
16500)<br />
S-23(12000-18000)<br />
S-24 (14300-<br />
18300) (SG)<br />
S-25 (15100-<br />
18300)<br />
S-26,27 (16400-<br />
20000,20900)<br />
S-28 (14300-<br />
22400)<br />
S-29 (18400-<br />
22400) (SAG)<br />
S-30(22400-4500)<br />
PHOD<br />
S-31 (22400-<br />
26000)<br />
S-32 (24050-<br />
26000)<br />
P B 3<br />
6000 8560 42.67 7440 1120 10500 3060 15.1 41.1<br />
6750 9630 42.67 8370 1260 10500 2130 15.1 25.4<br />
7743 11047 42.67 9601 1445.68 10850 1248 15.1 13.0<br />
7500 10700 42.67 9300 1400 10850 1550 15.1 16.7<br />
7988 11396 42.66 9905 1490.88 11050 1144 15.1 11.6<br />
9000 12840 42.67 11160 1680 11100 -60 15.1 (-) 0.5<br />
9563 13643 42.66 11858 1784.88 11550 (-) 308 15.1 (-) 2.6<br />
9000 12840 42.67 11160 1680 11600 440 15.1 3.9<br />
10725 15301 42.67 13299 2002 11600 (-) 1699 15.1 (-) 12.8<br />
11325 16157 42.67 14043 2114 11950 (-) 2093 15.1 (-) 14.9<br />
12300 17548 42.67 15252 2296 12000 (-) 3252 15.1 (-) 21.3<br />
P B 4<br />
10725 15301 42.67 13299 2002 24100 10801 15.1 81.2<br />
13800 19688 42.67 17112 2576 24100 6988 15.1 40.8<br />
16800 23968 42.67 20832 3136 25100 4268 15.1 20.5<br />
16800 23968 42.67 20832 3136 25200 4368 15.1 21.0<br />
18038 25734 42.67 22367 3366.88 26100 3732 15.1 16.7<br />
S-33 (26000)(Secy) 19500 27820 42.67 24180 3640 40000 15820 15.1 65.4<br />
22500 32100 42.67 27900 4200 45000 17100 15.1 61.3<br />
S-34<br />
(30000)(Cab.Secy)<br />
Central President Visits Lucknow Unit<br />
Central President Er.M.Shanmugam along with K.V.Ramesh, ACT/IRTSA visited Lucknow unit, NR and<br />
addressed a large gathering of Supervising Engineers.<br />
Er.P.C.Bihari welcomed the gathering. Many speakers including Er.Sukla, Er.A.K.Srivastava,<br />
Er.MadanRai, Er.Mishra and Sri.Yadava condemned the insignificant recommendations made by SCPC. In his<br />
long speech Central President called upon all the Supervising Engineers to attend all the agitations organized by<br />
IRTSA enmass. Er.Rehman, Zonal Secretary, NR thanked the gathering and assured the CP full participation from<br />
the Lucknow Voice of Rail unit. Engineers The meeting was held under the chairmanship Page – 9 of Sri.Siyamram Bajpayi, Patron MarIRTSA.<br />
ch - <strong>April</strong>, <strong>2008</strong>
RATIO BETWEEN MINIMUM OF 5TH & 6TH CPC SCALES<br />
Existing Pay Scales<br />
as per<br />
5th CPC<br />
ANNEXURE – I A<br />
A B C D E F G<br />
Equivalent Pay Max.of Max. of Min. pay Min.<br />
Band & Grade Pay 5th CPC 6th CPC - 6th pay -<br />
(6 th CPC) Scales Scales CPC 5th PC<br />
P B-2<br />
Ratio between<br />
MIN. 5th & 6th<br />
CPC Scales<br />
S-9 (5000-8000) 8700-34800+4200 8000 39000 12900 5000 2.58<br />
S-10 (5500-9000) 8700-34800+4200 9000 39000 12900 5500 2.35<br />
S-11(6500-6900) 8700-34800+4200 6900 39000 12900 6500 1.98<br />
S12((6500-10500) do 10500 39000 12900 6500 1.98<br />
S-13 (7450-11500) 8700-34800+4600 11500 39400 13300 7450 1.78<br />
S-14 (7500-12000) 8700-34800+4800 12000 39600 13500 7500 1.80<br />
S-15 (8000-13500) 8700-34800+5400 13500 40200 14100 8000 1.76<br />
P B-3<br />
New scale- (Group A<br />
entry) (8000-13500)(JS) 15600-39100+5400 13500 44500 21000 8000 2.63<br />
S-16,(9000) 15600-39100+5400 9000 44500 21000 9000 2.33<br />
S-17(9000-9550) do 9550 44500 21000 9000 2.33<br />
S-18 (10325-10975) (SS) 15600-39100+6100 10975 45200 21700 10325 2.10<br />
S-19 (10000-15200) 15600-39100+6100 15200 45200 21700 10000 2.17<br />
S-20 10650-15850) 15600-39100+6500 15850 45600 22100 10650 2.08<br />
S-21 12000-16500 JAG) 15600-39100+6600 16500 45700 22200 12000 1.85<br />
S-22 (12750-16500) 15600-39100+7500 16500 46600 23100 12750 1.81<br />
S-23(12000-18000) 15600-39100+7600 18000 46700 23200 12000 1.93<br />
S-24 (14300-18300) (SG) 15600-39100+7600 18300 46700 23200 14300 1.62<br />
S-25 (15100-18300) 15600-39100+8300 18300 47400 23900 15100 1.58<br />
S-26 (16400-20000) 15600-39100+8400 20000 47500 24000 16400 1.46<br />
S-27(16400-20900) do 20900 47500 24000 16400 1.46<br />
P B-4<br />
S-31 (22400-26000)<br />
S-28 (14300-22400) 39200-67000+9000 22400 76000 48200 14300 3.37<br />
S-29 (18400-22400)<br />
(SAG) 39200-67000+9000 22400 76000 48200 18400 2.62<br />
S-30 (22400-24500)<br />
(PHOD)<br />
39200-<br />
67000+11000 24500 78000 50200 22400 2.24<br />
39200-<br />
67000+13000 24500 80000 52200 22400 2.33<br />
39200-<br />
67000+13000 26000 80000 52200 24050 2.17<br />
S-32 (24050-26000)<br />
S-33 (26000))(Secy) 80000 26000 80000 80000 26000 3.08<br />
S-34 (30000)(Cab.Secy) 90000 30000 90000 90000 30000 3.00<br />
IRTS SC RAILWAY UNIT SUBMITS MEMORANDUM TO MM<br />
IRTSA South Central Railway Zonal Secretary Er.G Krishna Rao submitted a memorandum against the<br />
retrograde recommendations of Sixth Central Pay commission to Sri.Raj Kamal Rao, Member<br />
Mechanical, Railway Board during his visit to Secunderabad on 12.04.<strong>2008</strong>. He appealed for immediate<br />
intervention of MM to restore the lost morale among the technical staff in general Technical supervisors<br />
in particular. Er.B.Appalasamy, Zonal President, Er.Ramanamoorthy and many others were present on<br />
the occasion.
Voice of Rail Engineers Page – 10 <strong>March</strong> - <strong>April</strong>, <strong>2008</strong><br />
ANNEXURE – I B<br />
WIDE VARIATION OF % AGE INCREASE OF MINIMUM OF EXISTING AND PROPOSED PAY SCALES &<br />
PAY FIXATION RECOMMENDED BY SIXTH CPC AS PER PAGE No 59, 60, 61 AND 62 OF VI CPC REPORT<br />
(%age Rise of Total Emoluments – Calculated as on 01.01.2006)<br />
Pre-<br />
Revi<br />
sed<br />
Scale<br />
Min<br />
of<br />
Exist.<br />
Scale<br />
Existing Emoluments<br />
Max<br />
of<br />
Exist.<br />
Scale<br />
Min.<br />
Emolument<br />
BP+DP+<br />
24%DA<br />
On 1.1.06<br />
Max<br />
Emoluments<br />
Pay<br />
Band<br />
Corresponding<br />
pay<br />
bands<br />
Recommended Emoluments<br />
Grade<br />
pay<br />
Total Min.<br />
Pay<br />
On 1.1.06<br />
Increase/<br />
decrease<br />
in Min.<br />
Pay<br />
% age<br />
increase<br />
S-1 2550 2660 4743 4948 1S 4440 1300 5740 997 21.02<br />
S-2 2610 3150 4855 5859 1S 4550 1400 5950 1095 22.56<br />
S-3 2650 3300 4929 6138 1S 4620 1650 6270 1341 27.21<br />
S-4 2750 3800 5115 7068 PB-1 4990 1800 6790 1675 32.75<br />
S-5 3050 3950 5673 7347 PB-1 5310 1900 7210 1537 27.09<br />
S-6 3200 4900 5952 9114 PB-1 5570 2000 7570 1618 27.18<br />
S-7 4000 6000 7440 11160 PB-1 6960 2400 9360 1920 25.81<br />
S-8 4500 7000 8370 13020 PB-1 7830 2800 10630 2260 27.00<br />
S-9 5000 8000 9300 14880 PB-2 8700 4200 12900 3600 38.71<br />
S-10 5500 9000 10230 16740 PB-2 9570 4200 13770 3540 34.60<br />
S-11 6500 6900 12090 12834 PB-2 11310 4200 15510 3420 28.29<br />
S-12 6500 10500 12090 19530 PB-2 11310 4200 15510 3420 28.29<br />
S-13 7450 11500 13857 21390 PB-2 12970 4600 17570 3713 26.80<br />
S-14 7500 12000 13950 22320 PB-2 13050 4800 17850 3900 27.96<br />
S-15 8000 13500 14880 25110 PB-2 13920 5400 19320 4440 29.84<br />
New 8000 13500 14880 25110 PB-3 15990 5400 21390 6510 43.75<br />
S-16 9000 (Fixed) 16740 25110 PB-3 15600 5400 21000 4260 25.45<br />
S-17 9000 9550 16740 17763 PB-3 15990 5400 21390 4650 27.78<br />
S-18 10325 12575 19205 23390 PB-3 17970 6100 24070 4866 25.34<br />
S-19 10000 15200 18600 28272 PB-3 17400 6100 23500 4900 26.34<br />
S-20 10650 15850 19809 29481 PB-3 18540 6500 25040 5231 26.41<br />
S-21 12000 16500 22320 30690 PB-3 20880 6600 27480 5160 23.12<br />
S-22 12750 16500 23715 30690 PB-3 22190 7500 29690 5975 25.20<br />
S-23 12000 18000 22320 33480 PB-3 20880 7600 28480 6160 27.60<br />
S-24 14300 18300 26598 34038 PB-3 24890 7600 32490 5892 22.15<br />
S-25 15100 18300 28086 34038 PB-3 26280 8300 34580 6494 23.12<br />
S-26 16400 20000 30504 37200 PB-3 28540 8400 36940 6436 21.10<br />
S-27 16400 20900 30504 38874 PB-3 28540 8400 36940 6436 21.10<br />
S-28 14300 22400 26598 41664 PB-4 39200 9000 48200 21602 81.22<br />
S-29 18400 22400 34224 41664 PB-4 43280 9000 52280 18056 52.76<br />
S-30 22400 24500 41664 45570 PB-4 48990 11000 59990 18326 43.99<br />
S-31 22400 26000 41664 48360 PB-4 48990 13000 61990 20326 48.79<br />
S-32 24050 25000 44733 46500 PB-4 52770 13000 65770 21037 47.03<br />
S-33 26000 (Fixed) 46500 - - 80000 (Fixed) - 33500 72.04<br />
S-34 30000 (Fixed) 55800 - - 90000 (Fixed) - 34200 61.29<br />
Month ending<br />
REVISED RATES OF DA AFTER IMPLEMENTATION OF SCPC REPORT (An IRTSA Calculation)<br />
Ave. CPI<br />
(1982<br />
=100<br />
as Base)<br />
With effect<br />
from<br />
%age Rise of<br />
CPI<br />
over 536 –<br />
As in Dec,05)<br />
DA on<br />
Revd. Pay/<br />
Pension<br />
(1982 Base)<br />
Average CPI<br />
(2001 =100<br />
As Base)<br />
%age Rise of<br />
CPI over 536<br />
As in<br />
December,05)<br />
DA on<br />
Revised Pay/<br />
Pension<br />
(2001 Base)<br />
31. 12. 2005 536.00 1.1.06 Nil Nil 115.76 Nil Nil<br />
30. 06. 2006 550. 38 1.7.06 2.68 % 2 % 118.87 2.68 % 2 %<br />
31. 12. 2006 568.91 1.1.07 6.13 % 6 % 122.87 6.04 % 6 %<br />
30. 06. 2006 587.66 1.7.07 9.63 % 9 % 126.92 9.64 % 9 %<br />
31. 12. 2007 605.50 1.1.08 14.84 % 12 % 130.08 12.37 % 12 %<br />
* Linking factor for conversion of 2001=100 base index to previous 1982=100 index series is 4.6
Voice of Rail Engineers Page – 11 <strong>March</strong> - <strong>April</strong>, <strong>2008</strong><br />
Railway Board Letters<br />
Incentive for acquiring higher Scientific / Accounts<br />
/ Technical qualification to Group “C” employees.<br />
Rly. Bd’s letter No. E(NG)I-<strong>2008</strong>/IC-2/1, dt 21.2.<strong>2008</strong>.<br />
Reference Board’s letter No. E(NG)/64/RC1/25 dated<br />
14.05.66 and No.E(NG)I/87/IC2/1 dated 29.05.89 read<br />
with Board’s letter No. E(NG)I/97/IC1/4 dated 12.11.2001<br />
regarding grant of incentives to Group “c” employees for<br />
acquiring higher Scientific / Accounts / Technical<br />
qualification.<br />
The Central Administrative Tribunal vide its order<br />
dated 27.11.2007 in O.A No.333 of 2007 filed by Shri.<br />
M.C.Talukdar, has directed to consider the claim of<br />
applicant for advance increments if he is identically<br />
situated like applicants (Shri. Ashok Sengupta & Others)<br />
in O.A No. 270 of 1996 and the scheme extended to<br />
Group “B” officers who were given increased number of<br />
increments from 04.05.1990.<br />
The matter has been considered by the Ministry<br />
of Railways in the light of the above development and it<br />
has been decided that the Group “C” employees who<br />
acquired the specified qualification prior to 01.07.1988<br />
and given cash award of Rs.200 / two increments as per<br />
Board’s letter No. E(NG)64/RC1/25 dated 14.05.66 may<br />
also be considered and given balance two / four<br />
increments, as the case may be, in accordance with the<br />
Board’s letter No.E(NG)I/87/IC2/1 dated 29.05.89 w.e.f<br />
04.05.90 in the scale and stage at which they were<br />
drawing their pay / scale on 04.05.1990.<br />
New Office Bears of IRTSA/Lallaguda Workshop, SCR<br />
N.V.Ramana Murthy President<br />
Narmada Rao<br />
Working President<br />
K.P.Chari<br />
Vice President<br />
Ch.Muralidhar Rao Vice President<br />
Venu<br />
Vice President<br />
B.Appalasamy<br />
Secretary<br />
Kotiswamy<br />
Asst. Secretary<br />
A.Kishore<br />
Asst. Secretary<br />
K.L.N.Swamy<br />
Asst. Secretary<br />
Sirisha<br />
Asst. Secretary<br />
Naveeenchandra Babu Asst. Secretary<br />
K.Subramanyam<br />
Asst. Secretary<br />
K.Anjaneyulu<br />
Org. Secretary<br />
K.L.N.R.Sharma<br />
Org. Secretary<br />
K.Sathyanarayana Reddy Org. Secretary<br />
K.Chandrasekar<br />
Org. Secretary<br />
S.Narendar Naidu<br />
Org. Secretary<br />
P.Suresh<br />
Org. Secretary<br />
Khaja Miya<br />
Org. Secretary<br />
G.Subbaiaah<br />
Treasurer<br />
G.Venkatasubbaiah Asst. Treasurer<br />
V.V.Appa Rao<br />
Auditor<br />
Advisory Committee<br />
P.Inderbabu, Devi Prasad, Govind Chandu, A.V.Rao,<br />
NOTICE<br />
All Units & Subunits of IRTSA are requested to:-<br />
i) Get their Accounts audited & passed, hold their AGMs,<br />
conduct Elections & send reports to General Secretary ,<br />
Zonal Secretaries and Editor, VRE.<br />
iii) a) Launch intensive Membership @ Rs 100 PA.<br />
iv) Send Central Quota to Central Treasurer, IRTSA. Er.<br />
O. N. Purohit, # 106, Suraj Nagar, Jodhpur- 34<strong>2008</strong> (Mob<br />
Voice<br />
09828024476)<br />
of Rail<br />
by<br />
Engineers<br />
DD – in favour of IRTSA only.<br />
RNI TC. NO. TN ENG 04<br />
DRO NO KIDS 21481/07<br />
GS-IRTSA<br />
COORDINATION MEETING OF IRTSA AND<br />
AIREF HELD AT NEWDELHI<br />
Immediately after the submission of Sixth Pay<br />
Commission Recommendations, the Coordination<br />
meeting for SCPC struggle committee of IRTSA and<br />
AIREF was held at New Delhi on 02.04.<strong>2008</strong>.<br />
Er.M.Shanmugam, Central President/IRTSA,<br />
Er.Harchandan Sngh, GS/IRTSA, Er.N.R.Chaudhary,<br />
President / AIRF and Er.A.K.Tyagi, SG/AIREF<br />
addressed the meeting. Er.L.N.Pathak, AGS/NRMU<br />
participated as a special invitee. He appealed the unity<br />
among all technical employees in Government service<br />
against whom great injustice has been done by the<br />
SCPC.<br />
IRTSA Office bearers meet<br />
Sri.R.Velu, MOSR<br />
Office bearers of IRTSA under the leadership<br />
of Central President Er.M.Shanmugam along with<br />
Er.N.R.Chaudhary, President / AIRF met Honourable<br />
MOSR, Sri.Velu at his residence on 03.04.<strong>2008</strong>. They<br />
have handed over a memorandum against the<br />
retrograde recommendations made by the SCPC FOR<br />
technical staff and Technical supervisors.<br />
Er.Shanmugam explained TO the minister the<br />
necessity to have exclusive pay scales for technical<br />
staff and Technical Supervisors. The Minister heard<br />
the views very keenly and forwarded the memorandum<br />
to Railway Board.<br />
IRTSA DELEGATION MEETS CRB, FC & MM<br />
On 29th march, Central President along with the<br />
team of office bearers of IRTSA met CRB, FC & MM at<br />
Chennai during their visit to ICF and Southern Railway.<br />
He handed over the memorandums individually to them.<br />
He explained in brief about the negative impacts the<br />
SCPC recommendations will have on Technical staff. He<br />
pleaded to the CRB and members to do the needful to<br />
concede the legitimate demands of Technical staff and<br />
Technical supervisors.<br />
CENTRAL PRESIDENT MEETS CRB<br />
AT THE INSTANCE OF RAILWAY MINISTER<br />
On 3 rd <strong>April</strong>, 08 Central President Er. M.<br />
Shanmugam along with officer bearers of IRTSA and<br />
Er.N.R.Chaudhary, President / AIREF got an appointment<br />
with Sri.Lalu Prasad Honourable Minister for<br />
Railways. But due to his pre occupation the Minister<br />
advised the delegates to meet the Chairman Railway<br />
Board. All the delegates met the CRB at his chamber and<br />
handed over the memorandum against the<br />
recommendations of SCPC. Er.Shanmugam pressed the<br />
demand of one grade upgradation for technical staff of<br />
Railways than the non technical staff considering the<br />
responsibilities and accountability shouldered by the<br />
technical staff.<br />
ENGINEERS!<br />
CONTRIBUTE LIBERALLY TO STRUGGLE FUND<br />
FOR THE STRUGGLE AHEAD AND<br />
SEND THE SAME TO THE CENTRAL TREASURER
Voice of Rail Engineers RNI TC. NO. TN ENG 04747/26.03.07 Page-12 DRO NO KIDS 21481/07<br />
HIGHLIGHTS OF SIXTH CPC REPORT<br />
* Revised pay to be effective from Jan 1, 2006 -Pay+ 74 DA + 40% Fixation<br />
* Allowances to be effective from date of Notification<br />
* Wages hiked by an average of 28 % & not by 40%, as reported in media.<br />
– Difference is due to counting of DA instead DP (as proposed in SCPC Report)<br />
SCPC REPORT<br />
Para No Page<br />
11.1 643<br />
* To cost exchequer Rs 12,561 crores in <strong>2008</strong>-09 ( As estimated by SCPC) 11.52 649<br />
* Additional one-time burden (as SCPC) Rs 18,060 crores toward arrears 11.52 649<br />
* Minimum pay Rs 6,660; Maximum Rs 80000 -Ratio Min: Max 1:12 11.3 643<br />
* Current age of 60 for superannuation to be maintained 6.2.4 361<br />
* No exceptions barring scientists & medical specialists<br />
* Number of grades reduced to 20 against prevailing 35 2.2.18 43<br />
* 5-day work week to continue; Only 3 national holidays allowed 11.41 648<br />
* Other gazetted holiday to be adjusted in restricted holidays<br />
* Rate of Annual Increment 2.5%. * High performers to get 3.5% increment in Group A 11.5 & 11.6 644<br />
* Existing rates of most of the allowances to be doubled 11.24 646<br />
* Education allowance reimbursement at Rs 1,000 per child PM 11.28 646<br />
* Hostel subsidy to be increased 10 times to Rs 3,000 11.28 646<br />
* Person stagnating at maximum of any pay band for more than a year -<br />
to be placed in immediate next higher pay band without change in grade<br />
*Performance linked incentive scheme to be introduced.<br />
*PLB may be replaced by PLIS in stages, if accepted by Railways.<br />
* All fixed allowances to be made inflation proof – - To be revised on DA reaching 50 % 11.30 647<br />
* All recommendations to be treated as an 'organic whole' –<br />
11.10 644<br />
- As partial implementation will bring in several anomalies and inconsistencies.<br />
* 4 Long Running Pay Bands - PB-1 Rs 4860-20200, PB – 2 Rs 8700-34800, PB 3 Rs 15600-<br />
39100 and PB 4 Rs 39200-67000.<br />
2.2.18<br />
7.36.77<br />
43<br />
531<br />
* Basic pay shall comprise of sum of pay in the pay band and grade pay. 2.2.18 43<br />
* Up-gradation & merger of JE-II / CMA-II (Rs 5000-8000) and<br />
JE-I / CMA-I (Rs 5500-9000) to the Pre-Revised Grade of Rs 6500-10500<br />
2.2.18 &<br />
7.36..77<br />
43<br />
531<br />
* Up-gradation & merger of SE (Rs 6500-10500) to Pre-Revised Grade of Rs 7450-11500. 7.36.77 531<br />
* Clubbing of Scales of Rs 5000-8000), Rs 5500-9000), (Rs 6500-10500), Rs 7450-11500. 2..2.8 38<br />
Rs 7500-!2000 & Rs 8000-13500 (Group B) in one Pay Band of PB 2 Rs 8700-34800<br />
2.2.18 43<br />
* Classification of these Scales in Group B. 2.2.8 38<br />
* Free medical and life insurance for All categories of jobs that involve inherent element<br />
of risk with deleterious effect on health over a period of time -<br />
*Corporatisation & Conversion of Railways into a Central Public Sector Undertaking<br />
Liberal severance package for employees leaving service between 15 to 20 years 11.36<br />
Higher rates of pension for retirees and family pensioners on attaining the age of 80 Years by<br />
20%, 85 Years by 30%, 90 Years by 40%, 95 Years by 50% & 100 Years by 100%.<br />
4.2.58 251<br />
11.37<br />
Revision of the commutation table suggested for commutation of pension. 11.38<br />
IRTSA ACTION PROGRAMME<br />
AFTER AN ELABORATE ACTION PROGRAMME AND AGITATION AT DELHI ON 21 & 22 APRIL, 08, AGAINST THE<br />
SIXTH CPC REPORT, IRTSA HAS DECIDED TO DIRECT ALL THE ZONAL UNITS AND SUBUNITS<br />
TO AGITATE AT THEIR LEVEL AGAINST THE SCPC REPORT, HOLD GATE MEETINGS, PROCESSIONS,<br />
PASS & SEND RESOLUTIONS / TELEGRAMS OF PROTEST DURING 3RD & 4TH WEEK OF MAY, 08<br />
DEVELOP PUBLIC AWARENESS AGAINST THE INJUSTICE DONE BY THE PAY COMMISSION &<br />
GET READY FOR DIRECT ACTION – INCLUDING WORK-TO-RULE, IF DEMANDS ARE NOT CONCEDED<br />
M. Shanmugam,<br />
President, IRTSA<br />
Harchandan Singh,<br />
General Secretary, IRTSA<br />
Published by Sri.M.Shanmugam, Central President, on behalf of<br />
Indian Railways Technical Supervisors Association<br />
from 4, 6 th Street, TVS Nagar, Padi, Chennai – 600050 and printed by him at Four Yes Offset Press,<br />
A – 40, Karthigayan Salai, Periyar Nagar, Chennai – 600082. Editor: M.Selvaraj