Order No. 35 - ITC Law Blog
Order No. 35 - ITC Law Blog
Order No. 35 - ITC Law Blog
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
In the Matter of<br />
UNITED STATES INTERNATIONAL TRADE COMMISSION<br />
Washington, D.C.<br />
CERTAIN KINESIOTHERAPY DEVICES<br />
AND COMPONENTS THEREOF<br />
luv, <strong>No</strong>_337-TA-323<br />
ORDER NO. <strong>35</strong>:<br />
GRANTING COMPLAINANTS’ MOTION TO STRIKE NEWLY<br />
ADDEDUNTIMELY INVALIDITY AND OTHER OPINIONS FROM<br />
RESPONDENTS’ JULY 9, 2012 SUPPLEMENTAL REBUTTAL<br />
EXPERT REPORT OF SARI LOCKER<br />
(August 8, 2012)<br />
On July 13, 2012, Complainants Standard Innovation (US) Corp. and Standard<br />
Innovation Corporation (collectively, “SIC”) filed a motion to strike untimely invalidity opinions<br />
and references from the Supplemental Expert Report of Sari Locker (“July 9 Report”). (Motion<br />
Docket <strong>No</strong>. 823-044.) On July 30, 2012, respondents LELO Inc., Leloi AB, LELO, PHE Inc.<br />
d/b/a Adam & Eve, Nalpac Enterprises, Ltd. d/b/a/ Nalpac, Ltc., E.T.C., Inc. d/b/a Eldorado<br />
Trading Company, Inc., Williams Trading Co., Inc., Honey’s Place, Inc. and Lover’s Lane & Co<br />
(collectively, “Opposing Respondents”) filed a response opposing the motion} On July 30,<br />
2012, the Commission Investigative Staff (“Staff”) filed a response in support of the motion.<br />
At the end of May 2012, respondents LELO Inc., LELOi AB, and Lelo Shanghai Trading<br />
introduced a new version of their Tiani product, the Tiani 2. The partiesmoved for and were<br />
granted leave to supplement their expert reports—limited to infringement and non-infringement<br />
1On July 24, 2012, I granted Motion Docket <strong>No</strong>. 823-O48—Unopposed Motion of<br />
Manufacturer/Importer and Distributor Respondents and Lover's Lane & Co. to Extend the<br />
Deadline to File a Response to Complainants’ Motion to Strike Newly Added Untimely<br />
Invalidity and Other Opinions From Respondents‘ July 9, 2012 Supplemental Rebuttal Expert<br />
Report of Sari Locker—and extended the deadline to file a response to July 30, 2012.
issuesraised by the Tiani 2. (See Motion Docket <strong>No</strong>. 823-033, granted by email on June 22,<br />
2012.) A<br />
SIC argues Dr. Locker’s July 9 Report violates the scope of the leave granted, going<br />
beyond Tiani 2 infringement issues, and presenting new or revised invalidity opinions and<br />
references. SIC requests that paragraphs 4, <strong>35</strong>-47, 58-61, and 64-119 of and “Attachments” 17,<br />
18,19, 31, 33, 36, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 45, 49, 50, 51, 54, 55, 56, 61, 62, 63, 70, 73, 74, 75, 76, and<br />
78 to the July 9 Report be stricken.<br />
The Opposing Respondents argue that SIC’s experts did not limit their supplemental<br />
expert reports to whether the Tiani 2 infringed the claims of the ’605 patent. The Opposing<br />
Respondents contend SIC’s experts gave extensive claim construction opinions and opinions<br />
related to domestic industry. The Opposing Respondents argue Dr. Locker’s challenged<br />
opinions respond directly to opinions given by SIC’s experts and are proper rebuttal testimony. 2<br />
The Staff contends, contrary to SIC’s assertions, that most of the challenged paragraphs<br />
do not relate to invalidity. The Staff asserts the majority of the supplemental opinions in Dr.<br />
Locker’s supplemental report relate to new opinions regarding SIC’s experts’ claim construction<br />
opinions. The Staff argues that Dr. Locker’s response to these opinions is untimely as they<br />
should have been presented in her first rebuttal report. The Staff notes the supplemental expert<br />
V<br />
reports Werestrictly limited to infringement and argues the portions of Dr. Locker’s July 9 report<br />
that go beyond infringement of the Tiani 2 should be stricken.<br />
The Opposing Respondents do not assert that the challenged opinions address<br />
infringement of the Tiani 2. The Opposing Respondents have not sought leave to otherwise<br />
2The Opposing Respondents state they withdraw paragraphs 39, 44-47, 58, and 69-71, 108-118<br />
of Dr. Locker’s Supplemental Report.<br />
-2
supplement their expert reports. The challenged opinions are stricken because they are beyond<br />
the permissible scope of the supplemental expert report.<br />
Accordingly, Motion Docket <strong>No</strong>. 823-O44 is GRANTED. Paragraphs 4, <strong>35</strong>-38, 40-43,<br />
59-61, and 64-68, 72-107, and 119 ofDr. Locker’s July 9, 2012 report, including the<br />
Attachments cited therein, are stricken<br />
A % %;/ o<br />
%fi4<br />
Thomas B. Pender<br />
Administrative <strong>Law</strong> Judge<br />
__<br />
-3
Page<br />
l —Certificate of Service<br />
CERTAIN KINESIOTHERAPY DEVICES<br />
337-TA-823<br />
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE<br />
I, Lisa R. Barton, hereby certify that the attached <strong>Order</strong> <strong>No</strong>. <strong>35</strong> has been served by hand<br />
upon the Commission InvestigativeAttorney, Mareesa A. Frederick, Esq., and the<br />
following parties as indicated, on August 8 , 2012.<br />
Lisa R. B on, Acting Secretary<br />
U.S. International Trade Commission<br />
500 E Street, SW<br />
Washington, DC 20436<br />
On Behalf of Complainants Standard Innovation<br />
Corporation and Standard Innovation (US)C0rp.:<br />
Brian K. Wunder, Esq.<br />
OSHA LIANG LLP<br />
909 Fannin Street, Suite <strong>35</strong>00<br />
Houston, TX 77010<br />
( ) Via Hand Delivery<br />
( ) Via Overnight Mail<br />
(\) Via First Class Mail<br />
( ) Other: ________<br />
For Respondent Mile Inc. dlblal Lion’s Den Adult:<br />
J. Michael Murray, Esq.<br />
BERKMAN, GORDON, MURRAY & DeVAN<br />
55 Public Square, Suite 2200<br />
Cleveland, Ohio 44113-1949<br />
( ) Via Hand Delivery<br />
( ) Via Ovemight Mail<br />
(\) Via First Class Mail<br />
( ) Other:<br />
For Respondents LELO Inc., Leloi AB, LELO, Natural<br />
Contours Europe, Momentum Management, LLC<br />
(a/k/a Bushman Products), Evolved <strong>No</strong>velties Inc.,<br />
PHE, Inc. d/b/a Adam & Eve, Nalpac Enterprises, Ltd.<br />
(d/b/a Nalpac, Ltd.), E.T.C. Inc. (d/b/a Eldorado<br />
Trading Company, Inc.), Williams Trading Co., Inc.,<br />
and Honey’s Place Inc.:<br />
Michael H. Selter, Esq.<br />
MANELLI SELTER PLLC<br />
2000 M Street, NW, Suite 700<br />
Washington, DC 20036<br />
( ) Via Hand Delivery<br />
( ) Via Overnight Mail<br />
(\) Via First Class Mail<br />
()Other: i
Page 2 —Certificate of Service<br />
For Respondent Shamrock 51 Management Company,<br />
Inc.:<br />
James D. Kisio, P.A.<br />
Attorney at <strong>Law</strong> "<br />
740 Florida Central Parkway, Suite. 1004<br />
Longwood, FL 32750<br />
For Respondent Paris Intimates, LLC:<br />
LAW OFFICE OF ANDREW P. LAHSER, PLC<br />
16824 E. Ave of the Fountains, Suite 15<br />
Fountain Hills, AZ 85268<br />
For Respondent Marsoner, Inc.:<br />
Ira M. Schwartz<br />
DeCONCINI MCDONALD YETWIN & LACY, P.C.<br />
7310 N. l6“‘ St., Suite 330<br />
Phoenix AZ 85020<br />
Respondents:<br />
Lover's Lane & Co.<br />
46750 Port St.<br />
Plymouth, M148170<br />
Castle Megastore Group, Inc.<br />
1045 S. Edward Drive<br />
Tempe, AZ 85281<br />
Love Boutique-Vista, LLC<br />
(d/b/a Déja vu)<br />
2130 Industrial Court<br />
Vista, CA 92081<br />
Peekay Inc.<br />
901 W. Main Street, Suite A<br />
Auburn, WA 98001<br />
Toys in Babeland LLC<br />
707 East Pike Street<br />
Seattle, WA 98122<br />
( ) Via Hand Delivery<br />
( ) Via Overnight Mail<br />
(\) Via First Class Mail<br />
( )Other:<br />
( ) Via Hand Delivery<br />
( ) Via Overnight Mail<br />
(\) Via First Class Mail<br />
()Other: it?<br />
( ) Via Hand Delivery<br />
( ) Via Overnight Mail<br />
(\) Via First Class Mail<br />
()Other: L<br />
( ) Via Hand Delivery<br />
( ) Via Ovemight Mail<br />
(\) Via First Class Mail<br />
()Other: i<br />
( ) Via Hand Delivery<br />
( ) Via Overnight Mail<br />
(\) Via First Class Mail<br />
()Other: i<br />
( ) Via Hand Delivery<br />
( ) Via Overnight Mail<br />
(\) Via First Class Mail<br />
()Other: L<br />
( ) Via Hand Delivery<br />
( ) Via Ovemight Mail<br />
(\) Via First Class Mail<br />
( )Other:<br />
( )Via Hand Delivery<br />
( ) Via Overnight Mail<br />
(\) Via First Class Mail<br />
()Other: i
Page 3 —Certificate of Service<br />
PUBLIC MAILING LIST<br />
Heather Hall<br />
LEXIS-NEXIS<br />
9443 Springboro Pike<br />
Miamisburg, OH 45342<br />
Kenneth Clair<br />
Thomson West<br />
1100 Thirteen Street, NW, Suite 200<br />
Washington, DC 20005<br />
( ) Via Hand Delivery<br />
( ) Via Overnight Mail<br />
(\) Via First Class Mail<br />
()Other: L<br />
( ) Via Hand Delivery<br />
( ) Via Overnight Mail<br />
(\) Via First Class Mail<br />
()Other: L