09.03.2014 Views

Human Population Size Is Limiting Population Growth a Key Factor ...

Human Population Size Is Limiting Population Growth a Key Factor ...

Human Population Size Is Limiting Population Growth a Key Factor ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

<strong>Is</strong>sue Summary:<br />

<strong>Human</strong> <strong>Population</strong> <strong>Size</strong><br />

<strong>Is</strong> <strong>Limiting</strong> <strong>Population</strong><br />

<strong>Growth</strong> a <strong>Key</strong> <strong>Factor</strong> in<br />

Protecting the<br />

Environment?


Malthus' Essay on the<br />

Principle of <strong>Population</strong><br />

• points out that population size grows<br />

geometrically while agricultural production only<br />

grows arithmetically<br />

• Based on this, he says that population will<br />

eventually outstrip food supply<br />

• Eventually, the "demographic transition" of<br />

developed nations slowed population growth<br />

rates


<strong>Population</strong> <strong>Growth</strong> Policies were<br />

developed to slow population<br />

growth by:<br />

• economic aid<br />

• family planning aid<br />

• but neither has worked very well<br />

• UN Cairo Conference decided that better<br />

results would follow from improving women's<br />

access to education and health care


Should we be trying to slow<br />

population growth?<br />

• Ehrlich argues that unrestricted growth will lead<br />

to both human and environmental disaster<br />

• Some religious leaders oppose population control<br />

because they say family planning is against "God's<br />

will."<br />

• One might argue that there are various<br />

interpretations of "God's will". Which is<br />

"correct"?


By 2025, world<br />

population will<br />

probably be around<br />

8,000,000,000<br />

by 2050<br />

9,000,000,000


Global agricultural production<br />

has increased, but it has not<br />

kept up with rising demand<br />

• Other concerns are:<br />

• Loss of topsoil due to erosion<br />

• Depletion of aquifers<br />

• High cost of energy for making fertilizers<br />

•<br />

Modern Farming methods utilize a monoculture<br />

approach, this diminishes biodiversity and genes in<br />

our crops


Additionally, there are<br />

the problems of<br />

• Climate Change<br />

• air pollution<br />

• resource depletion<br />

• loss of species<br />

• collapse of fisheries


Yes --- Lester Brown<br />

• Argues that stabilizing world population is central to<br />

preventing overconsumption of environmental<br />

resources<br />

• Harvest trees, overgraze, etc. at rates that are faster<br />

than natural mechanisms can cope with


• Wackernagel et al. -- U.S National Academy of Sciences<br />

• <strong>Human</strong>'s demands exceeded earth's regenerative<br />

capacity by 20% in 1999<br />

• a "bubble econonmy" is going on with food<br />

production<br />

• UN Demographers -- in 2003, life expectancy in sub-<br />

Saharan Africa has gone from 62 to 47 years<br />

• HIV may claim more lives than all the wars of the<br />

20th Century


Environmental issues have mostly been<br />

local, but their effects won't be<br />

• Examples include<br />

• death of Aral Sea<br />

• burining rainforest in Indonesia<br />

• collapse of Cod fishery in Canada<br />

• melting glaciers that supply water to Andean<br />

cities<br />

• dust bowl forming in NW China<br />

• Depletion of Great Plains aquifer in US


No -- Stephen Moore<br />

• Argues that human numbers pose no<br />

threats to human survival or the<br />

environment but that efforts to control<br />

population do threaten human freedom and<br />

worth<br />

• Coercive Policies in China are the antithesis<br />

of <strong>Human</strong> Rights<br />

• Technology can provide us with what we<br />

need


• <strong>Population</strong> size is still increasing, but at<br />

lower rates . . .<br />

• People today are healthier than they’ve ever<br />

been before<br />

• We’ve enough land for everyone, we just<br />

need to be more efficient in using it<br />

• Malthus was wrong about population<br />

growth


Some Food for Thought<br />

Malthus may have been wrong about<br />

the date, but it is true that eventually<br />

carrying capacity of the planet will be<br />

exceeded by too many people.


Age Distribution of the World’s <strong>Population</strong><br />

<strong>Population</strong> Structures by Age and Sex, 2005<br />

Millions<br />

Less Developed<br />

Regions<br />

Age<br />

More Developed<br />

Regions<br />

Male Female<br />

80+<br />

75-79<br />

70-74<br />

65-69<br />

60-64<br />

55-59<br />

50-54<br />

45-49<br />

40-44<br />

35-39<br />

30-34<br />

25-29<br />

20-24<br />

17-19<br />

10-16<br />

5-9<br />

0-4<br />

Male Female<br />

-300 -200 -100 0 100 200 300<br />

-300 200 700<br />

Source: United Nations, World <strong>Population</strong> Prospects: The 2002 Revision (medium scenario), 2003.<br />

© 2005 <strong>Population</strong> Reference Bureau


Currently, we fail to provide the basic<br />

necessities for one out of every six people<br />

on the planet. If we cannot (or will not) do<br />

it today, why do we think we will be able to<br />

do so in the future when there will be 3.1<br />

billion more people by 2050?


Availability of Doctors, Selected Countries<br />

1995-2002*<br />

Physicians per 1,000 people<br />

Cuba<br />

5.3<br />

Greece<br />

4.4<br />

U.S.<br />

2.7<br />

Jordan<br />

Mexico<br />

China<br />

Bolivia<br />

1.7<br />

1.5<br />

1.4<br />

1.3<br />

Cambodia<br />

Bangladesh<br />

0.3<br />

0.2<br />

* Most recent year available for each country.<br />

Source: World Bank, World Development Indicators 2004.<br />

© 2005 <strong>Population</strong> Reference Bureau


Notes on Availability of Doctors, Selected Countries<br />

• <strong>Population</strong> growth can affect a country’s capacity to address the health needs<br />

of its people through trained personnel and accessible health facilities.<br />

• Access to health services varies greatly from country to country. In Greece,<br />

for example, there are 4.4 doctors for every 1,000 people.<br />

• This is over 17 times higher than in Bangladesh, which has only 0.2 doctors<br />

for every 1,000 people.<br />

© 2005 <strong>Population</strong> Reference Bureau


If we do not slow population growth, some<br />

argue, we are deciding by default to raise<br />

death rates for humans (already occurring<br />

in some parts of Africa) and greatly<br />

increasing environmental harm.


The US National Academy of Sciences and the<br />

Royal Society of London issued the following<br />

joint statement:<br />

``If current predictions of population growth and<br />

patterns of human activity on the planet remain<br />

unchanged, science and technology may not be<br />

able to prevent either irreversible degradation of<br />

the environment or continued poverty for much<br />

of the world.''


So, what do we do?<br />

• Most of the growth in human population<br />

size can be controlled via education of<br />

women and their partners (family planning)<br />

• As well as an examination of our goals,<br />

values, and long-term desires for humans on<br />

the planet


Family Planning<br />

• Family planning provides health and educational<br />

services that help couples choose how many<br />

children to have and when to have them. These<br />

programs vary, but most provide information on<br />

• 1) birth spacing,<br />

• 2) birth control, and<br />

• 3) health care for pregnant women and their<br />

infants.


• Advantages of family planning include:<br />

• Helping increase the proportion of<br />

married women in developing countries<br />

who use modern forms of contraception<br />

from 10% of married women in the 1960s<br />

to 54% in 2002.<br />

• Being responsible for at least 55% of the<br />

drop in TFR in developing countries. From<br />

6 in 1960 to 3.1 in 2002


• Reducing the number of legal and illegal<br />

abortions per year<br />

• Decreasing the risk of death during<br />

pregnancy.<br />

• Despite all this, 42% of all pregnancies in the<br />

developing world are unplanned and 26%<br />

end up in abortion


• An estimated 250--350 million women in<br />

developing countries want to limit the<br />

number and control the spacing of their<br />

children but they lack access to information<br />

and services.<br />

• According to the United Nations, providing<br />

this access and information could prevent<br />

and estimated 5.8 million births a year and<br />

more than 5 million abortions a year.


• There is a disconnect between the size of<br />

families women desire, and what they have.<br />

• Often, this is due to a lack of knowledge and<br />

resources about how to control family size


Desire for Smaller Families<br />

Women With Two Children Who Say They Want No More Children<br />

Percent<br />

60 59<br />

50<br />

52<br />

29<br />

38<br />

33<br />

29<br />

22<br />

13<br />

Bangladesh Egypt Guatemala Kenya Zimbabwe<br />

© 2005 <strong>Population</strong> Reference Bureau<br />

Late 1980s<br />

Late 1990s/Early 2000s<br />

Source: ORC Macro, Demographic and Health Surveys, 1988-2000.


How do we pay for family planning?<br />

• The United Nations posits that we could provide family<br />

planning to all the couples in developing countries that<br />

want it for about $17 Billion per year.<br />

• This does sound like a lot of money, however,<br />

• this equals about 8 days worth of worldwide military<br />

spending<br />

• Put another way: folks living in developed countries<br />

could easily pay about $4.80/year/person to reduce the<br />

world's population by about 3.1 Billion people.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!