3 - Jacobs University

More documents

Recommendations

Info

Disclaimer April 23, 2013 To whom it may concern, I, Borislav Hadzhiev, hereby declare that this Ph.D. Thesis is an independent work that has not been submitted elsewhere for conferral of a degree. Publications about the content of this work require the written consent of Volkswagen AG. The results, opinions and conclusions expressed in this thesis are not necessarily those of Volkswagen AG. Borislav Hadzhiev i
Page 1: Second-Party Quality Auditing in th
Page 5 and 6: Contents 1 Introduction 1 2 Researc
Page 7 and 8: A customer is the most important vi
Page 9 and 10: margins and strengthening their mar
Page 11 and 12: Certainly companies want to work on
Page 13 and 14: should be a permanent objective of
Page 15 and 16: more than 60 production facilities
Page 17 and 18: I. f MAX = 1Hz I. f MAX = 6Hz II.
Page 19 and 20: 3.1 General Strategy for Employing
Page 21 and 22: The work of Wittmann and Bergholz (
Page 23 and 24: ever, to improve the structure of t
Page 25 and 26: developing markets (Figure 4). Due
Page 27 and 28: write that ”countries such as Ind
Page 29 and 30: internal processes and increases or
Page 31 and 32: Moreover, today OEMs tend to supply
Page 33 and 34: Tier 1 Supplier 1 Tier 2 (Tier n) S
Page 35 and 36: In this respect evaluation of the q
Page 37 and 38: Finally, the quality auditing proce
Page 39 and 40: This information is particularly he
Page 41 and 42: could be more efficient than having
Page 43 and 44: The audit plan together with the na
Page 45 and 46: Audit data collected during the on-
Page 47 and 48: of the respective product group(s).
Page 49 and 50: qualifications to perform the tasks
Page 51 and 52: Apart from E P Volkswagen has defin
Page 53 and 54:
from the German Sternchenfragen). T
Page 55 and 56:
induced problems originating in the
Page 57 and 58:
While ppm and HSF are two indicator
Page 59 and 60:
for this problem is to define class
Page 61 and 62:
steps as well as the resulting part
Page 63 and 64:
this improvement is of particular b
Page 65 and 66:
expenses for the organization (cost
Page 67 and 68:
20% 9% 57% 7% 2,4% 2,2% 1,9% 1,3% 0
Page 69 and 70:
sections. However, this is not part
Page 71 and 72:
Region 3 Amount of Incomplete Recor
Page 73 and 74:
Region 7 10,00% Missing Material Gr
Page 75 and 76:
Thus for example, in Region 1 (Figu
Page 77 and 78:
to evaluate the extent to which cha
Page 79 and 80:
● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ●
Page 81 and 82:
● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ●
Page 83 and 84:
Frequency 0 50 100 150 TOTAL_Chemie
Page 85 and 86:
Distribution of TOTAL_Metal_FQF3 Di
Page 87 and 88:
Things look a bit different in the
Page 89 and 90:
Figure 32 presents a summary of the
Page 91 and 92:
probable that supplier’s quality
Page 93 and 94:
asis within the individual auditing
Page 95 and 96:
to differences even for the same ty
Page 97 and 98:
Plant: A WSGR: 0058 Plant: B WSGR:
Page 99 and 100:
Kolmogorov-Smirnov test are below t
Page 101 and 102:
7.3 Matching Quality Capability and
Page 103 and 104:
overall quality capability evaluati
Page 105 and 106:
that the null-hypothesis of the tes
Page 107 and 108:
Distribution of EU3 no ppms Distrib
Page 109 and 110:
esults for material group 0096 are
Page 111 and 112:
E [Y | Y > 0] = q 1 − p N × 106
Page 113 and 114:
Note that the critical amount of de
Page 115 and 116:
Distribution of Records w/o ppm (MG
Page 117 and 118:
● Cummulative Delivery Quantity v
Page 119 and 120:
Table 4: Summary of the performed l
Page 121 and 122:
Residuals vs Leverage Residuals vs
Page 123 and 124:
● Cummulative Delivery Quantity v
Page 125 and 126:
Slope (β_1) -2,5 -2,0 -1,5 -1,0 -0
Page 127 and 128:
8 Conclusion Second-party quality a
Page 129 and 130:
Section 3 presented the research ap
Page 131 and 132:
several additional considerations h
Page 133 and 134:
part suppliers in Region A (Figure
Page 135 and 136:
of ppm, which has an intersect β 0
Page 137 and 138:
allows them to identify potential p
Page 139 and 140:
Team_A_Chemie_FQF5 Team_A_Chemie_FQ
Page 141 and 142:
Team_C_Chemie_FQF5 Team_C_Chemie_FQ
Page 143 and 144:
Team_E_Chemie_FQF5 Team_E_Chemie_FQ
Page 145 and 146:
Team_G_Chemie_FQF5 Team_G_Chemie_FQ
Page 147 and 148:
Team_I_Chemie_FQF5 Team_I_Chemie_FQ
Page 149 and 150:
Team_E_Elektrik_FQF5 Team_E_Elektri
Page 151 and 152:
Team_A_Metal_FQF5 Team_A_Metal_FQF6
Page 153 and 154:
Team_C_Metal_FQF5 Team_C_Metal_FQF6
Page 155 and 156:
Team_E_Metal_FQF5 Team_E_Metal_FQF6
Page 157 and 158:
Team_G_Metal_FQF5 Team_G_Metal_FQF6
Page 159 and 160:
Distribution of Team_I_Metal_FQF4 D
Page 161 and 162:
B Results from the analysis present
Page 163 and 164:
Distribution of O_P_WSGR_0058_Plant
Page 165 and 166:
Distribution of H_I_WSGR_0068_Plant
Page 167 and 168:
B.1 List of Material Groups Table 6
Page 169 and 170:
Formula Q-concrete: Quality managem
show all

3 - Jacobs University

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

Delete template?

Save as template?