25.03.2014 Views

Compton Scattering Sum Rules for Massive Vector Bosons

Compton Scattering Sum Rules for Massive Vector Bosons

Compton Scattering Sum Rules for Massive Vector Bosons

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

2.5 Feynman <strong>Rules</strong> <strong>for</strong> L Eff<br />

• W µν trans<strong>for</strong>ms covariantly (c.f. section 1.2), hence the quadratic term in the<br />

field strength tensor is invariant;<br />

• F µν is invariant by construction;<br />

• ( W ∗ µW µ) ′<br />

= e −iα(x) W ∗ µe iα(x) W µ = W ∗ µW µ since W and e ±iα(x) commute;<br />

• ( W ∗ µνW µ) ′<br />

= e −iα(x) W ∗ µνe iα(x) W µ = W ∗ µνW µ .<br />

As all appearing terms are gauge invariant, so are linear combinations. It follows that<br />

L Eff is invariant under U(1) gauge trans<strong>for</strong>mations.<br />

2.5 Feynman <strong>Rules</strong> <strong>for</strong> L Eff<br />

In order to describe interactions with the newly-constructed effective Lagrangian L Eff ,<br />

we need to derive the corresponding Feynman rules. In this theory, two types of<br />

vertices appear: the 3-point vertex γW W and the 4-point contact vertex γγW W . In<br />

order to recover the correct Feynman rules, the states have to be contracted with the<br />

fields coming from the Lagrangian, or more precise, the action (c.f. section 1.3). For a<br />

quick overview over the resulting Feynman rules, see App. A.1.<br />

A Taylor expansion of the S-Matrix yields the interaction part<br />

∫<br />

S = 〈f|T exp (i<br />

= ✘ 〈f|1|i〉 ✘ ✘ ✘✿0<br />

dxL Eff )|i〉 (2.26)<br />

∫<br />

+ i d 4 x〈f|L Eff |i〉<br />

which corresponds to a Feynman rule describing the transition from the initial state |i〉<br />

to the final state |f〉 ≠ |i〉. The contraction is evaluated using the plane-wave expansions<br />

which can be found in App. A.2.1. There, we have also derived the contraction relations.<br />

In the following we will neglect the integration ∫ d 4 x; however, it is still implied in<br />

this symbolic notation.<br />

17

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!