29.03.2014 Views

2009 MAGNET™ PROFILES - American Nurse Today

2009 MAGNET™ PROFILES - American Nurse Today

2009 MAGNET™ PROFILES - American Nurse Today

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

MAGNET <strong>PROFILES</strong><br />

Nursing research sheds light<br />

on key nursing-care values<br />

To prepare for their hospital’s Magnet redesignation,<br />

nursing leaders formulated a philosophy of patient-care<br />

delivery.<br />

By Lori Neushotz, DNP, PMHCNS-BC, NP, CASAC; Kathleen Parisien, MA, RN; Carol Porter, DNP, MPA, RN;<br />

Pamela Hoar, MSN, RN; Patricia Holloman, BSN, RN, CNOR; and Joyce J. Fitzpatrick, PhD, MBA, RN, FAAN<br />

Having a philosophy of patient-care delivery<br />

gives nurses a framework, values, and beliefs<br />

to guide their professional practice. The philosophy<br />

should directly reflect the relationships<br />

through which care is planned, coordinated, and<br />

delivered. Identifying nurses’ top values is a critical<br />

first step in formulating a philosophy of nursing<br />

practice that has relevance and meaning for all<br />

nursing staff.<br />

As nursing leaders at our hospital prepared for<br />

Magnet redesignation, they were particularly interested<br />

in exploring such a philosophy. Overall<br />

goals were to:<br />

• identify the relevance of the existing philosophy<br />

to nurses, particularly those providing bedside<br />

care<br />

• engage nurses at all levels in developing a new<br />

philosophy of nursing—one that reflects core<br />

values from their perspective.<br />

Before the formal project was implemented, the<br />

chief nursing officer (CNO) asked staff nurses about<br />

their understanding of the existing philosophy of<br />

nursing. The CNO found they had little<br />

awareness of the philosophy and saw it as<br />

only barely related to the care they provided.<br />

work environments. However, while these reports<br />

were relevant to the nursing department’s overall<br />

goals, they weren’t specific to the philosophy of<br />

nursing project, and thus aren’t included in this<br />

report.<br />

Phase 2: Research<br />

In August 2007, the task force designed a formal survey<br />

and distributed it to all registered nurses (RNs)<br />

employed at the hospital. The survey focused on<br />

identifying the values nurses considered most important<br />

to the care they provided. (See Understanding the<br />

study methods.)<br />

Results<br />

Of the 1,800 surveys distributed, 839 responses<br />

were returned, for a response rate of 46.6%. Clinical<br />

nurses accounted for 81% of respondents; nurse<br />

leaders, advance practice nurses, and educators accounted<br />

for 19%.<br />

RNs from all inpatient and ambulatory care ar-<br />

(continued on page 52)<br />

Phase 1: Planning<br />

The formal project had two phases—planning<br />

and research. During early 2007, two<br />

forums were held to generate discussion<br />

about the need for a more clinically relevant<br />

philosophy that was meaningful to direct<br />

patient care. The first discussion occurred<br />

among nursing leaders (directors and nurse<br />

managers) at a regularly scheduled meeting.<br />

Then during <strong>Nurse</strong>s Week, nurses were<br />

asked to list concepts relevant to nursing<br />

care. Next, a task force was appointed to<br />

launch a formal survey among all nurses.<br />

A literature review found that no similar<br />

projects had been conducted. It did find<br />

several papers focused on creating healthy<br />

50 <strong>American</strong> <strong>Nurse</strong> <strong>Today</strong> Volume 4, Number 8

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!