Article - Damages for Copyright Infringement ... - Phillips Nizer LLP
Article - Damages for Copyright Infringement ... - Phillips Nizer LLP
Article - Damages for Copyright Infringement ... - Phillips Nizer LLP
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
As seen in the Fashion Mannuscript (August 2003)<br />
THE LEGAL CORNER<br />
By Donald L. Kreindler, Esq.<br />
PHILLIPS NIZER<strong>LLP</strong><br />
DAMAGES FOR COPYRIGHT INFRINGEMENT<br />
Owners of copyrights who institute lawsuits <strong>for</strong> copyright infringement have greater rights to recover damages than is the<br />
case in most lawsuits. This article will discuss the types of damages that may be awarded to the copyright owner who prevails in an<br />
action <strong>for</strong> copyright infringement.<br />
(a) Attorneys’ Fees<br />
Owners of copyrights are often in a superior position in seeking damages than plaintiffs in most other lawsuits. This is<br />
because, unlike the rule applicable in most lawsuits, copyright owners who are successful in a suit <strong>for</strong> copyright infringement are<br />
entitled to reimbursement of recoverable attorneys’ fees in an amount to be determined by the Court. This is so provided the<br />
copyright owner has registered its copyright prior to the infringement.<br />
The copyright owner who has prevailed in a suit <strong>for</strong> copyright infringement is also entitled to either (a) actual damages and<br />
profits or (b) statutory damages in an amount to be determined by the Court as he may elect at any time be<strong>for</strong>e final judgment is<br />
rendered. We treat here treat the two alternatives separately.<br />
(b) Actual <strong>Damages</strong> and Profits<br />
The successful plaintiff in a copyright infringement suit may recover his actual damages and lost profits, or he may recover the<br />
profits that were earned by all of the infringers. For example, if the infringed design is a copyrighted fabric pattern, the copyright<br />
owner is entitled to all of the profits obtained by (a) those who manufactured or sold the fabric containing the infringing pattern; and<br />
(b) the garment manufacturer(s) who sold the garments containing the infringing pattern; and (c) the retailers who purchased and<br />
resold the garments with the offending pattern. It is easy to see that, with a successful pattern, the total profits of the fabric<br />
manufacturer(s), the garment manufacturer(s) and the retailer(s) can be very substantial. Thus, the plaintiff’s choice will usually be<br />
to elect to receive the profits realized by the infringers. In analyzing those profits, the plaintiff need only show the gross revenue<br />
obtained by each of the infringers and the infringers must then demonstrate the expenses directly attributable to this revenue.<br />
Where an infringer is “willful” (usually determined by whether the infringer was aware that he was infringing a copyrighted design),<br />
the claimed expenses will be scrutinized more closely. If the plaintiff were to choose his own lost profits, he would have to prove<br />
specific lost sales - mere speculation that he would have received the orders that the infringer obtained, or other orders, would not<br />
be sufficient. Thus, the copyright owner would almost always choose the profits obtained by the infringers.<br />
(c) Statutory <strong>Damages</strong><br />
The copyright owner who has prevailed in his action <strong>for</strong> copyright infringement may also choose statutory damages in lieu of<br />
actual damages or the infringer’s profits. The determination of statutory damages will be made by the Court.<br />
Under the statute, the plaintiff will receive an award of between $7,500 and $30,000 per work “as the Court considers just”,<br />
in a case in which the infringement is not found to have been willful. Where the infringement is found to have been willful, the<br />
maximum award is increased to up to $50,000 per work. “Per work” refers to infringements of a particular design no matter how<br />
many times that particular design has been infringed, as <strong>for</strong> example, where many different styles of garments utilized the infringing<br />
pattern.<br />
In making the determination of statutory damages, the Court will consider a number of factors including (a) the expenses<br />
saved and profits reaped by the defendants, (b) the revenues lost by the plaintiff, (c) the value of the copyright, (d) the deterrent<br />
effect of the award on other infringers, and (c) factors relating to individual culpability. These factors would include how innocent the<br />
infringer’s conduct was, the infringing defendant’s cooperation in providing relevant records, and to what extent the award will<br />
discourage the defendant from future infringements.<br />
Page 1 of 2
(d) Conclusion<br />
Because the costs of litigation are so high, many lawsuits (unless involving very substantial amounts) can result in a pyrrhic<br />
victory. Because a copyright owner can choose to recover either all multiple infringers’ profits, or statutory damages, and can also be<br />
reimbursed <strong>for</strong> all of his attorneys’ fees, copyright infringement lawsuits often represent the exception. Some textile and apparel<br />
companies who create copyrights have actually operated profit centers in pursuing infringers of their copyrights.<br />
The morale <strong>for</strong> the copyright owner is be aggressive in protecting your copyrights. The morale <strong>for</strong> the copyright infringer is<br />
- beware!<br />
As seen in the August 2003 issue of the Fashion Mannuscript.<br />
Reproduction in part or whole without the expressed written permission of the author is prohibited.<br />
© <strong>Copyright</strong> 2003 PHILLIPS NIZER <strong>LLP</strong>