India's Telecom Reform - Indian Institute of Public Administration
India's Telecom Reform - Indian Institute of Public Administration
India's Telecom Reform - Indian Institute of Public Administration
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
2<br />
Key Regulatory y Issues<br />
Convergence<br />
The NTP-99 also spoke <strong>of</strong> the convergence <strong>of</strong> communications<br />
technologies and the need to have a policy that<br />
could exploit it advantageously.<br />
On August 11, 2000, the government received the draft<br />
report <strong>of</strong> Sub-Group on Convergence. The group proposed<br />
a Convergence Law and suggested a common regulatory<br />
body for India for content and carriage, i.e., broadcasting<br />
and telecommunications. The report received a<br />
mixed response from sector players and experts. This was<br />
in part, because it did not, as it was perhaps not mandated<br />
to do so, deal with the large number <strong>of</strong> extremely contentious<br />
licensing issues that would result during the move to<br />
a converged policy environment in which carriage and<br />
content would be treated in an integrated manner.<br />
It was surprising to notice the relatively low pr<strong>of</strong>ile manner<br />
in which the Information Technology Act 2000 was<br />
passed. The Act gave legal sanctity to electronic transactions.<br />
It also created the <strong>of</strong>fice <strong>of</strong> Controller <strong>of</strong> Certification<br />
Authority (CCA) to regulate Certifying Authorities (CA)<br />
who would assign digital signatures and other instruments<br />
<strong>of</strong> authentication. The retiring Director <strong>of</strong> DoT’s Centre<br />
for Development <strong>of</strong> Telematics (C-DoT) was appointed<br />
as the first CCA.<br />
The Cabinet approved the Communications Convergence<br />
Bill 2001 drafted by the committee. It also approved the<br />
repeal <strong>of</strong> The <strong>Indian</strong> Telegraph Act 1885, The <strong>Indian</strong> Wire-<br />
less Telegraphy Act 1933, Telegraph Wire Unlawful Possession<br />
Act 1950, The Cable Television Networks (Regulation)<br />
Act 1995 and the <strong>Telecom</strong> Regulatory Authority <strong>of</strong><br />
India Act 1997. The Bill, ambitious in intent, was unprecedented<br />
in leaving no role for the government in licensing.<br />
However, experts criticised it for being too general and<br />
not dealing with transition arrangements as also with issues<br />
relating to economic regulation. (The Bill was introduced<br />
in Parliament and was also reviewed by a Parliamentary<br />
Committee, but lapsed with the dissolution <strong>of</strong> the 13 th<br />
Lok Sabha before it could be made into law).<br />
Related, indirectly at least, to the same issue <strong>of</strong> convergence,<br />
the government announced the merger <strong>of</strong> the Ministry<br />
<strong>of</strong> Information Technology (MoIT) and Ministry <strong>of</strong><br />
Communications (MoC) on December 22, 2001. The new<br />
entity is now called the Ministry <strong>of</strong> Communications and<br />
Information Technology (MoCIT). The merger, much<br />
discussed and debated, brought together MoC and MoIT.<br />
However, the Ministry <strong>of</strong> Information and Broadcasting<br />
was left out <strong>of</strong> this attempt at dealing with the convergence<br />
<strong>of</strong> communications technologies.<br />
Licensing and Regulation Post<br />
NTP-99<br />
Within months <strong>of</strong> the new team <strong>of</strong> members <strong>of</strong> TRAI<br />
taking <strong>of</strong>fice, a series <strong>of</strong> decisions were taken, many <strong>of</strong><br />
which seem to reflect the message, explicit or implicit, about<br />
the events that led to the dissolution <strong>of</strong> the previous body<br />
7