17.04.2014 Views

State v Isoa Waqa HAC087S.08 - Law Fiji

State v Isoa Waqa HAC087S.08 - Law Fiji

State v Isoa Waqa HAC087S.08 - Law Fiji

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

2<br />

IN THE HIGH COURT OF FIJI<br />

AT SUVA<br />

CRIMINAL JURISDICTION<br />

Criminal Case No: HAC 087 of 2008<br />

STATE<br />

v.<br />

ISOA WAQA<br />

Hearing: 22 nd – 27 th January 2009<br />

Sentence: 27 th January 2009<br />

Counsel:<br />

Ms H. Tabete for <strong>State</strong><br />

Accused in person<br />

SENTENCE<br />

[1] <strong>Isoa</strong> <strong>Waqa</strong>, you have been found guilty of the offence of robbery with<br />

violence. The evidence at trial was that you were one of a group of men who<br />

broke into the house of Bimla Wati at 11pm on the 29 th of April 2008 and robbed<br />

her of jewellery. In the course of the robbery she was injured and had a<br />

lacerated ear lobe from an earring being pulled off her ear by force. She lived<br />

with a son, who was a patient at St. Giles Psychiatric Hospital, and both she and<br />

her son suffered not only physical harm but psychological trauma.<br />

[2] You have 21 previous convictions of which 4 are for robbery with violence.<br />

The last is dated November 2006 and you were imposed 2 years imprisonment<br />

for that offence. This offence was committed shortly after your release from<br />

prison. In 2008 in January you were convicted of absconding bail and were<br />

sentenced to 6 months imprisonment which you are now serving. You tell me<br />

that you will be due for release on the 11 th of May 2009.


2<br />

[3] Clearly you are an incorrigible offender. There are few mitigating<br />

circumstances in this case. You are single (with one child), unemployed and play<br />

rugby and volleyball in your spare time. It seems you have made no attempt to<br />

rehabilitate yourself and in this case took part in the robbery of the house of a<br />

neighbour.<br />

[4] The tariff for home invasion robberies is higher than other types of<br />

robbery because of the fear and insecurity caused to the inhabitants of a home<br />

which is violated by a violent robbery of this type. Such robberies are a menace<br />

to society. Indeed of the cases pending in the High Court, robbery with violence<br />

accounts for the largest number.<br />

[5] I start at 8 years imprisonment. The aggravating factors are the injury<br />

caused, the fact that the victims were vulnerable (one of them was suffering<br />

from mental illness) and the fact that the robbery was committed by a group of<br />

men at night. In mitigation you have told me that you have a 4 year old son and<br />

have tried to change your life. Sadly your list of previous convictions suggest<br />

otherwise.<br />

[6] Adjusting for all these factors I sentence you to 8 years imprisonment, to<br />

be served concurrently with the term you are now serving.<br />

Nazhat Shameem<br />

JUDGE<br />

At Suva<br />

27 th January 2009

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!