20.04.2014 Views

Common Foreign and Security Policy (CFSP)

Common Foreign and Security Policy (CFSP)

Common Foreign and Security Policy (CFSP)

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

<strong>Common</strong> <strong>Foreign</strong> <strong>and</strong><br />

<strong>Security</strong> <strong>Policy</strong> (<strong>CFSP</strong>)<br />

Estonia’s participation in the <strong>CFSP</strong> is based on the European principles <strong>and</strong> interests.<br />

We would like to see in the world more policy based on the shared values of the<br />

EU – democracy, personal freedoms <strong>and</strong> liberties, free market economy. It is quite<br />

natural, that from its own historical experience, Estonia underst<strong>and</strong>s especially well<br />

the importance of the promotion of free press <strong>and</strong> education on the development of<br />

democracy. We know well that supporting the liberalisation of the economy, promotion<br />

of exports <strong>and</strong> other free market reforms may be much more effective than direct<br />

economic assistance. Estonia’s participation in the debates of Council working groups<br />

<strong>and</strong> EU foreign ministers’ meetings is based on these principles.<br />

As much as the resources allow, Estonia contributes to all <strong>CFSP</strong> issues, being especially<br />

active <strong>and</strong> taking initiatives in the topics where our participation can add<br />

more value. Since joining the EU, the priorities have remained the same. The priority<br />

topics for Estonia within the <strong>CFSP</strong> are the European Neighbourhood <strong>Policy</strong>, EU-USA<br />

relations, the European <strong>Security</strong> <strong>and</strong> Defence <strong>Policy</strong> (ESDP), including EU-NATO relations,<br />

Western Balkans <strong>and</strong> the EU-Russia relations.<br />

The European Neighbourhood <strong>Policy</strong> has arrived at the phase of first stocktaking. In<br />

December 2006 the Commission presented the state of play <strong>and</strong> progress reports on<br />

the Neighbourhood partners, whose ENP Action Plans began to be implemented in<br />

2005. The Commission set also out new proposals for strengthening the neighbourhood<br />

policy. Estonia regards those proposals as useful <strong>and</strong> necessary. The ENP needs<br />

more differentiation than before, <strong>and</strong> the setting of clear priorities. In 2007 a broader<br />

discussion is anticipated regarding the further development of the ENP (especially in<br />

the Eastern direction). Alongside the general discussion we must ensure the implementation<br />

of the existing plans <strong>and</strong> objectives. Work is continuing on concrete issues,<br />

of which for us most important is the work on the EU-Ukraine enhanced agreement<br />

<strong>and</strong> starting the visa facilitation negotiations with Moldova. The South Caucasus<br />

countries are going to start the implementation of their action plans. Estonia intends<br />

to implement several projects in order to support work on the priority areas of<br />

these action plans. Although we have more contacts <strong>and</strong> exchange of experience with<br />

the neighbours in the East, we regard cooperation with the EU southern neighbours<br />

equally important.<br />

43


2006<br />

ESTONIAN MINISTRY OF FOREIGN AFFAIRS YEARBOOK<br />

Estonia’s relations with Russia form a part of the European Union’s relations with<br />

Russia. Estonia’s goal is to build in cooperation with other EU member states such<br />

a strategic relationship between the EU <strong>and</strong> Russia, which would take into account<br />

Estonia’s national interests <strong>and</strong> would be based on shared values. It is in the interests<br />

of all EU member states to ensure that Russia is democratic <strong>and</strong> that we have a stable<br />

partnership with Russia. We appreciate the work already done to ensure this. One of<br />

the most important issues of the coming years is the work on the new framework<br />

agreement to replace the EU-Russia Partnership <strong>and</strong> Cooperation Agreement (PCA).<br />

The new agreement should be more detailed <strong>and</strong> comprehensive than the existing<br />

one, reflecting the achievements of the last decade <strong>and</strong> giving a realistic frame to<br />

the development. Another important issue for Estonia is the implementation of the<br />

agreement on the four common spaces, signed in May 2005. Many aspects of this<br />

agreement have not yet been implemented. Estonia would like to see the comprehensive<br />

implementation of the four roadmaps, which are based on common values<br />

<strong>and</strong> interests. In the economic sphere the priority areas for Estonia are energy cooperation,<br />

reduction of trade barriers <strong>and</strong> cross-border cooperation. In the space<br />

of freedom, security <strong>and</strong> justice, the facilitation of the registration of foreigners is<br />

a priority. In the space of external security the priority of Estonia is the resolution<br />

of frozen conflicts. The priority of the space of education <strong>and</strong> science is the further<br />

reinforcement of cooperation within the sphere of culture <strong>and</strong> education. A third important,<br />

<strong>and</strong> positive, development has been the signing of the EU-Russia visa facilitation<br />

<strong>and</strong> readmission agreements at the Sochi summit. One of the most important<br />

outcomes of the visa dialogue should be the adoption <strong>and</strong> application by Russia of<br />

the European st<strong>and</strong>ards.<br />

The Western Balkans is important for Estonia, as the countries of this region have<br />

been offered the European perspective. Holding the Balkan countries on the Euro-<br />

Atlantic course by a positive engagement is the only way to achieve stability <strong>and</strong><br />

development in South-Eastern Europe. Estonia has contributed to the efforts to secure<br />

peace <strong>and</strong> stability in the Western Balkans by participating in the international peace<br />

support missions (including ESDP missions) <strong>and</strong> transferring the experience of reforms<br />

<strong>and</strong> accession to the EU <strong>and</strong> NATO. Taking into account the EU perspective of<br />

these countries, including the c<strong>and</strong>idate country status of Macedonia, Estonia has<br />

actively supported the adoption of negotiation m<strong>and</strong>ates to conclude visa facilitation<br />

<strong>and</strong> readmission agreements with Bosnia <strong>and</strong> Herzegovina, Macedonia, Montenegro<br />

<strong>and</strong> Serbia <strong>and</strong> to conclude the visa facilitation agreement with Albania. The negotiations<br />

with these countries were started on 30 November 2006.<br />

The most important issue of 2007 will be the settlement of the status of Kosovo,<br />

transfer of the international coordination to the EU <strong>and</strong> the launch of the EU Kosovo<br />

mission, in which Estonia will definitely take part. The future status of Kosovo must<br />

44


COMMON FOREIGN AND SECURITY POLICY (<strong>CFSP</strong>)<br />

2006<br />

be in line with the EU perspective of Kosovo <strong>and</strong> the Western Balkans. This will entail<br />

the increase of the role of the EU in the future of Kosovo.<br />

Being the first country to conclude diplomatic relations with Montenegro, Estonia<br />

has good opportunities for the fast development of relations with this country, <strong>and</strong><br />

an important role in facilitating Montenegro’s aspirations to become a full member<br />

of the European family.<br />

A strong transatlantic relationship is an important priority for Estonia. The EU <strong>and</strong><br />

NATO share common values, therefore their joint endeavours bear more fruit than<br />

the same efforts undertaken separately. The EU-USA cooperation on promoting democracy,<br />

economic integration over the Atlantic, <strong>and</strong> on energy issues is extremely<br />

important, irrespective of the occasionally emerging disagreements on certain questions.<br />

The EU <strong>and</strong> US are more successful if they work jointly on ensuring democracy<br />

<strong>and</strong> security. No issues should be barred from the discussion of the EU-NATO joint<br />

agenda. Unfortunately this is not always the case.<br />

As said, every member state can not deal with only its national priorities within the<br />

<strong>CFSP</strong>, but has to pay attention also to other issues. Through EU membership Estonia<br />

participates in the broad external activities of the EU. The European Union has set a<br />

goal to be active in all of the world’s hotbeds of crises <strong>and</strong> problematic regions. This<br />

is brought about by the underst<strong>and</strong>ing that in today’s world security risks do not<br />

recognise state frontiers.<br />

The Middle East – both directly the Israeli-Palestinian conflict, as well as the surrounding<br />

countries, also the Persian Gulf countries <strong>and</strong> North Africa – is a region which affects<br />

the political developments virtually in the whole world. The Southern <strong>and</strong> Eastern Mediterranean<br />

is historically an area where the interests of different countries <strong>and</strong> cultures<br />

meet. Underst<strong>and</strong>ably, Estonia can not have a leading role in forming joint positions regarding<br />

this part of the world, but the EU’s role <strong>and</strong> direct activities there have grown.<br />

Estonia takes also part in the Barcelona process. This process is somewhat unique<br />

in the <strong>CFSP</strong> context, by comprising the regular eye-to-eye meetings of the higher officials<br />

of the EU <strong>and</strong> its Southern partners (Egypt, Morocco, Algeria, Syria, Lebanon,<br />

Tunisia, Israel, the Palestinian Authority, Jordan, Turkey). For Estonia this forum is<br />

especially valuable, as it offers possibilities for bilateral contacts. As a result of this<br />

we can rely on information acquired from direct sources, when we formulate our<br />

positions towards the issues of this region. We consider also very valuable the Anna<br />

Lindh Euro-Mediterranean Foundation for Cooperation between Cultures, which was<br />

created one <strong>and</strong> half years ago within the framework of the Euro-Mediterranean partnership<br />

to support projects aimed at a mutual introduction of different cultures.<br />

45


2006<br />

ESTONIAN MINISTRY OF FOREIGN AFFAIRS YEARBOOK<br />

Within the limits of its resources, Estonia participates in the EU election observation<br />

missions. In 2006 Estonian observers participated among others in the elections of<br />

the Palestinian Authority, <strong>and</strong> in the Kongo Democratic Republic.<br />

Estonia continues in the participation of missions in Iraq <strong>and</strong> Afghanistan, which are<br />

not ESDP missions. Yet the EU has been considering increased engagement in these<br />

regions. The EU has created a civil mission to train the Iraqi police <strong>and</strong> is planning a<br />

civil operation in Afghanistan. The EU is also continuing its development aid to both<br />

regions. Estonia supports these endeavours actively <strong>and</strong> regards them as important.<br />

For example, Estonia fully supports the increasing of the role of the EU in the work<br />

to build up Afghanistan <strong>and</strong> we hope that an agreement between the EU members<br />

will be reached to this regard. Having increased in 2006 our military contribution to<br />

Afghanistan, Estonia supports also the creation of a civil ESDP mission (advising the<br />

local police).<br />

There was more active debate in 2006 within the EU over the possibilities to improve<br />

the effectiveness, cohesion <strong>and</strong> visibility of the EU’s external activities in the situation<br />

of the deadlock over the EU Constitutional Treaty. In Estonia’s opinion, more cohesion<br />

can be achieved by drawing up joint food for thought papers by the Council Secretariat<br />

<strong>and</strong> the Commission, appointing double-hatted EU representatives, improving<br />

the cooperation, coordination <strong>and</strong> exchange of information between the Commission,<br />

Council, member states <strong>and</strong> also the European Parliament. Cohesion will be increased<br />

also by closer cross-pillar cooperation (in member states between various ministries<br />

<strong>and</strong> agencies). Examples of areas where this is needed are fight against terrorism <strong>and</strong><br />

justice <strong>and</strong> home affairs (migration, visa issues etc).<br />

An important guarantee of the effectiveness of external activities is the financing of<br />

the <strong>CFSP</strong> according to the real needs. Estonia is satisfied that within the agreement<br />

on the new financial perspective it was possible to achieve a substantial increase<br />

of the <strong>CFSP</strong> budget. Taking into account the fast development of the ESDP <strong>and</strong> the<br />

ambitions of the EU in this sphere, it is important to continue work to increase the<br />

budget.<br />

46

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!