25.04.2014 Views

gray06 Nov-Dec 2009_Gray01_Jan-Feb 2005.qxd.qxd - Korean War ...

gray06 Nov-Dec 2009_Gray01_Jan-Feb 2005.qxd.qxd - Korean War ...

gray06 Nov-Dec 2009_Gray01_Jan-Feb 2005.qxd.qxd - Korean War ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

64<br />

The actual picture of the<br />

Batherson picture on the wal<br />

ABOVE: Norm<br />

Bodway (L) and<br />

Chuck Batherson (R)<br />

at National Museum<br />

of the Marine Corps<br />

LEFT: Chuck<br />

Batherson (R) points<br />

to picture of him and<br />

Norm Bodway at the<br />

National Museum of<br />

the Marine Corps<br />

Our trio included me (the tank commander), Corpsman Russell<br />

Hasselbach (HM3), USN, from Michigan, and Norm Bodway, from<br />

Wisconsin, the tank driver.<br />

We could not go to them directly because of a mine field. As a<br />

result, we gave the Chinese another target. They were dropping<br />

everything on us. Russell got hit, but he still took care of Marines<br />

who were hit.<br />

At one point, Lt Penterson, of the 75recoilless, was watching us<br />

when the Chinese dropped 5 or 6 rounds on us—and he couldn’t see<br />

us any more. He thought we were gone. He called the company<br />

after a couple hours to check on us. When we got back to our company<br />

area, I had to go back to everyone to show that we were still<br />

around.<br />

That day Lt Penterson put us in for the Silver Star, but it was<br />

downgraded to a Bronze Star with V.<br />

Incidentally, I still see Norm often, but I never did find Russell—<br />

and he lived close by. I didn’t know that until after he passed. But I<br />

did find his son.<br />

Charles (“Chuck”) Batherson, 36154 Abbey Drive<br />

Westland, MI 48185, (734) 721-0764<br />

ChuckandBarb5@sbcglobal.net<br />

I disagree!<br />

This is in response to the letter in The Graybeards, “Guest<br />

Editorial,” July/Aug. <strong>2009</strong>, p. 27, titled “Not ‘A Forgotten Victory’”<br />

I’m sorry to read that Mr. Ingbretsen believes the <strong>Korean</strong> <strong>War</strong><br />

was a humiliating military defeat. I, too, served in Korea. I was with<br />

the 7th Division from <strong>Dec</strong>ember 1950 through 1951. Although I<br />

wasn’t in the infantry, I was in the 48th Field Artillery and saw what<br />

war is all about. I do not agree with Mr. Ingbretsen’s “stalemate”<br />

term.<br />

We must start with where we were before the Communist<br />

attacked South Korea. The Second World <strong>War</strong> decided that! So,<br />

there we were with the 38th Parallel dividing what was once a unified<br />

country. The North and the South set up independent governments.<br />

North Korea wanted the whole country and attacked South<br />

Korea, and so we were in a war. South Korea, the U.S., and their<br />

allies defended South Korea. The Communists in North Korea and<br />

China simply wanted it all.<br />

Where does the writer get the idea we retreated to Pusan, indicating<br />

that the war ended there in a compromise? That simply was<br />

a phase of the war. Once the Americans and the United Nations<br />

regrouped, we fought like hell under General Ridgeway and retook<br />

all that had been given up. In the article Mr. Ingbretsen speaks of<br />

regaining North Korea; we never had it!<br />

Where do people get the idea that we lost the war? There is no<br />

comparison between Vietnam and the <strong>Korean</strong> <strong>War</strong>. Hasn’t Mr.<br />

Ingbretsen heard about General Custer and Little Big Horn? Did<br />

that one devastating defeat mean we lost the Indian <strong>War</strong>s?<br />

Now where does he think the “Police Action” term came from?<br />

It came from President Truman, who didn’t want to call it another<br />

war right after we had come out of WWII.<br />

I won’t defend General MacArthur, but I will stand with General<br />

Ridgeway any day. And didn’t President Truman see the need to<br />

support and defeat the Communists? You can bet he did!<br />

Yes, more than 36,000 Americans lost their lives defending a<br />

country that we didn’t know, but we stopped Communism. All these<br />

lives were precious and their sacrifices prevented Communism<br />

from spreading. Peace prevailed. Look at South Korea today and<br />

compare it with North Korea. Who was the winner here?<br />

The writer’s use of the word “conflict” irritates me today as it did<br />

when I heard it said by President Truman. Anyone who was in the<br />

<strong>Korean</strong> <strong>War</strong> knows full well that it wasn’t a conflict. No matter who<br />

said it; it was a WAR. Anyone who calls it a conflict should study<br />

the war first.<br />

Now let’s address the terms “defeat” and “victory.” Would it<br />

have been better to fight and win a war all the way to the Yalu<br />

River? What would we have then? It would have been a war with<br />

China. How many lives do you think we would have lost fighting<br />

the Chinese? Do you think the Chinese would have given up losing<br />

North Korea? What was the population of China? What was the<br />

population of America? A learned friend would call that Math 1.<br />

The closer we got to China the easier their attacks on UN forces<br />

would have been—and how many Chinese troops would have been<br />

thrown into the war? How many more South <strong>Korean</strong>, American and<br />

UN lives would have been lost?<br />

<strong>Nov</strong>ember – <strong>Dec</strong>ember <strong>2009</strong><br />

The Graybeards

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!