26.04.2014 Views

Integrative modes and metaphors - Laetus in Praesens

Integrative modes and metaphors - Laetus in Praesens

Integrative modes and metaphors - Laetus in Praesens

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Explor<strong>in</strong>g Intelligible Associations<br />

Ontological <strong>and</strong> process issues<br />

Part B: <strong>Integrative</strong> <strong>modes</strong> <strong>and</strong> <strong>metaphors</strong>:<br />

“ways of know<strong>in</strong>g”<br />

Anthony Judge <strong>and</strong> Nadia McLaren<br />

Union of International Associations<br />

at<br />

German Research Center for Artificial Intelligence GmbH<br />

(Saarl<strong>and</strong> University, Saarbrücken<br />

cken)


2. Associations <strong>and</strong> complexity<br />

– cognitive <strong>and</strong> otherwise<br />

2


Evolv<strong>in</strong>g pattern of associations<br />

<strong>in</strong> a learn<strong>in</strong>g society<br />

• Associations of ideas, concepts, , theories<br />

• Associations of different technologies<br />

• Associations across cultures<br />

• Associations across faiths <strong>and</strong> beliefs<br />

• Associations of values (for quality of life)<br />

• Aesthetic associations<br />

• Associations of people <strong>and</strong> other bodies<br />

3


Strategic opportunities for association<br />

• New associations of ideas, concepts, , theories<br />

• New associations of different technologies<br />

• New associations across cultures<br />

• New associations across faiths <strong>and</strong> beliefs<br />

• New aesthetic associations<br />

• New <strong>metaphors</strong><br />

• New associations of people <strong>and</strong> other bodies<br />

4


Implement<strong>in</strong>g associative strategies<br />

• Explor<strong>in</strong>g new patterns of concepts, theories<br />

• Explor<strong>in</strong>g new <strong>in</strong>ter-modal technologies<br />

• Explor<strong>in</strong>g cross-cultural cultural fertilization<br />

• Explor<strong>in</strong>g dialogue across faiths <strong>and</strong> beliefs<br />

• Explor<strong>in</strong>g new aesthetic associations<br />

• Explor<strong>in</strong>g new <strong>metaphors</strong><br />

• Explor<strong>in</strong>g new associations of people,<br />

groups,etc<br />

5


3. Crisis of mean<strong>in</strong>g<br />

-- faith-based vs evidence-based<br />

reality<br />

6


Contemporary crisis of mean<strong>in</strong>g<br />

• Conceptual <strong>in</strong>coherence <strong>in</strong> strategy<br />

– global<br />

– local<br />

• Loss of sense of direction<br />

• Loss of faith <strong>in</strong> systems <strong>and</strong> beliefs<br />

• Fragmentation of <strong>in</strong>itiatives<br />

• Inter-discipl<strong>in</strong>ary chaos <strong>and</strong> disrespect<br />

• Conceptual <strong>and</strong> policy gridlock<br />

• Severe erosion of <strong>in</strong>stitutional credibility<br />

7


Frenetic strategic desperation<br />

• Overproduction of<br />

– appeals<br />

– manifestos, declarations<br />

– resolutions<br />

• Mutual recrim<strong>in</strong>ation<br />

• Unrelated new <strong>in</strong>itiatives<br />

– unrealistic action plans<br />

– proliferation of organizations<br />

– content-free conferences<br />

8


Individual <strong>and</strong> collective uncerta<strong>in</strong>ty<br />

• Crises <strong>in</strong> f<strong>in</strong>ancial system<br />

• From employment to unemployment<br />

• Social <strong>in</strong>security (safety net <strong>in</strong>adequacy)<br />

• Urban violence <strong>and</strong> personal safety<br />

• Environmental fragility<br />

• Erosion of moral <strong>and</strong> ethical st<strong>and</strong>ards<br />

• Institutional corruption<br />

• Policy <strong>in</strong>decision & Leadership vacuum<br />

• Policy discont<strong>in</strong>uity -- broken promises<br />

9


Global values ?<br />

• Whose values?<br />

– whose values are recognized?<br />

– whose values are neglected?<br />

– what mean<strong>in</strong>g do they have locally?<br />

• Who designs the system of global values?<br />

– how are the values related?<br />

• Who imposes the values?<br />

– what of alternative values?<br />

– <strong>and</strong> those who disagree?<br />

• How do new values emerge…for the future?<br />

10


4. Policy challenges of the<br />

emergent knowledge society<br />

11


Information overload & underuse<br />

• A truism -- there is “too much” <strong>in</strong>formation<br />

• Overproduction of <strong>in</strong>formation<br />

• Limited dissem<strong>in</strong>ation / readership<br />

• Dim<strong>in</strong>ish<strong>in</strong>g collective attention span<br />

• Fragmented & disorganized <strong>in</strong>formation<br />

• “Dumb<strong>in</strong>g<br />

down” public <strong>in</strong>formation<br />

• Unreliable <strong>in</strong>formation -- mis<strong>in</strong>formation<br />

• An analogous problem?: overpopulation<br />

12


The Information Game<br />

Misrepresentation !!!<br />

Hype !!!<br />

Dis<strong>in</strong>formation<br />

Access<br />

Numbers !!!<br />

Gatekeepers !!!<br />

Junk mail !!!<br />

Overload !!!<br />

Dissem<strong>in</strong>ation<br />

Restrictive<br />

practices !!!<br />

Property<br />

Interpretation<br />

Complexity !!!<br />

Fragmentation !!!<br />

Penetration<br />

Classification<br />

Dirty tricks !!!<br />

Security !!!<br />

Secretiveness !!!<br />

Dubious<br />

<strong>in</strong>formants !!!<br />

Credibility<br />

Surveillance<br />

Mistrust !!!<br />

Conspiracy !!!<br />

13


The Relationship Game??? Access<br />

Misrepresentation !!!<br />

Hype !!! Stories !!!<br />

Dis<strong>in</strong>formation<br />

Introduction<br />

Competition !!!<br />

Gatekeepers !!!<br />

Plant<strong>in</strong>g<br />

the genes<br />

Memetic<br />

overload !!!<br />

Restrictive<br />

practices !!!<br />

Possessiveness<br />

Interpretation<br />

Fragmentation !!!<br />

Complexity !!!<br />

Mean<strong>in</strong>g ???<br />

Penetration<br />

Privacy<br />

Dirty tricks !!!<br />

Security !!!<br />

Secretiveness !!!<br />

Dubious<br />

<strong>in</strong>formants !!!<br />

Credibility<br />

Surveillance<br />

Mistrust !!!<br />

Conspiracy !!!<br />

14


Inappropriate policy <strong>metaphors</strong><br />

for a rapidly evolv<strong>in</strong>g society<br />

• Military <strong>metaphors</strong> (for peaceful purposes)<br />

– target<strong>in</strong>g... population groups<br />

– mobiliz<strong>in</strong>g…support<br />

– war…on drugs<br />

• Simplistic, selective, static, l<strong>in</strong>ear <strong>metaphors</strong><br />

– vision (but no other sense)<br />

– programm<strong>in</strong>g...people <strong>and</strong> organizations<br />

– po<strong>in</strong>ts <strong>in</strong> a l<strong>in</strong>e of argument<br />

– state of the world / environment / etc<br />

15


5. Challenges of knowledge<br />

organization<br />

16


Knowledge organization: “Technical” challenge<br />

• scope / comprehensiveness<br />

• response to detail<br />

• mathematical representation (modell<strong>in</strong>g(<br />

/ simulation)<br />

• visualization (geometry / topology)<br />

• user <strong>in</strong>teractivity: change of perspective <strong>and</strong> degree of<br />

detail<br />

• compatibility / consonance with popular frameworks<br />

(possibly as carriers)<br />

• <strong>in</strong>tuitive/psychological consonance<br />

• memorable / mnemonic challenge<br />

• adaptability / openness<br />

17


Knowledge organization: “Strategic” challenge<br />

• complementarity of <strong>in</strong>commensurable / oppos<strong>in</strong>g<br />

perspectives (keystone function)<br />

• global comprehension (grokability(<br />

grokability)<br />

• strategic <strong>in</strong>sight for governance <strong>and</strong> communication<br />

channell<strong>in</strong>g<br />

• compatibility / consonance with popular frameworks<br />

(possibly as carriers)<br />

• <strong>in</strong>tuitive/psychological consonance<br />

• memorable / mnemonic challenge<br />

18


Knowledge: “Psycho-cultural” challenge<br />

• Axes of methodological bias (W T Jones)<br />

– Order vs disorder; Static vs dynamic Cont<strong>in</strong>uity vs discreteness; Inner vs<br />

outer; Sharp focus vs soft focus; This world vs other world ; Spontaneity<br />

vs process<br />

• Epistemological m<strong>in</strong>dscapes (Magoroh<br />

Maruyama)<br />

– H (homogenistic(<br />

homogenistic, , hierarchical, classificational); I (heterogenistic(<br />

heterogenistic,<br />

<strong>in</strong>dividualistic, r<strong>and</strong>om); S (heterogenistic(<br />

heterogenistic, , <strong>in</strong>teractive, homeostatic); G<br />

(heterogenistic,, <strong>in</strong>teractive, morphogenetic)<br />

• Work-related related values (Geert<br />

Hofstede)<br />

– Power distance ; Uncerta<strong>in</strong>ty avoidance; Individualism; Mascul<strong>in</strong>ity<br />

• Modalities <strong>in</strong> dialogue (K<strong>in</strong>hide<br />

Mushakoji)<br />

– Affirmation; Negation; Affirmation <strong>and</strong> negation; Non-affirmation <strong>and</strong><br />

Non-negation<br />

negation<br />

• Modes of reality construction (Will McWh<strong>in</strong>ney)<br />

– Analytic; Dialectic; Axiotic; ; Mythic<br />

• Forms of <strong>in</strong>telligence (Howard Gardner)<br />

– L<strong>in</strong>guistic; Musical; Logical/mathematical; Spatial; Bodily-k<strong>in</strong>aesthetic<br />

k<strong>in</strong>aesthetic;<br />

Personal<br />

19


“Ontology”<br />

• Formal description of categories <strong>and</strong> relations<br />

• Derived from shared discourse of a knowledge<br />

community<br />

• Pragmatic, not <strong>in</strong>tended to be “true”<br />

• Used to provide a common framework <strong>in</strong>to<br />

which disparate data sets can be translated<br />

• Not created <strong>in</strong> a “prist<strong>in</strong>e” state<br />

20


Ontology - Phase 1: Focus on the data level<br />

• Identify <strong>in</strong>iitial set of data providers <strong>and</strong> form a<br />

consortium of data providers<br />

– The GDG as a “VO”<br />

– Perhaps á la the Gene Ontology Consortium<br />

• Clean <strong>and</strong> normalize exist<strong>in</strong>g data sets (accord<strong>in</strong>g to<br />

<strong>in</strong>ternal st<strong>and</strong>ards of data provider)<br />

21


Ontology -- Phase 2: Focus on the ontology<br />

level<br />

• Collaboratively def<strong>in</strong>e an ontology of<br />

globalization.<br />

– A series of workshops<br />

– Involve representatives of stakeholder groups<br />

– data providers, users <strong>and</strong> developers<br />

• Choose an encod<strong>in</strong>g st<strong>and</strong>ard for the ontology<br />

– OWL?<br />

• Def<strong>in</strong>e a methodology for ontological mapp<strong>in</strong>g of<br />

contributor data sets<br />

22


Ontology -- Phase 3: Focus on the<br />

middleware level<br />

• Build a grid hub at Pr<strong>in</strong>ceton University (see diagram at<br />

end of document).<br />

• Develop an ontology “filter” to process <strong>in</strong>com<strong>in</strong>g data<br />

sets.<br />

• Develop a data aggregation cach<strong>in</strong>g mechanism for<br />

ontologically filtered data sets, which will be accessible<br />

by the analytical services.<br />

23


Ontology -- Phase 4: Focus on the analytical<br />

<strong>and</strong> visualization level<br />

• Choose a flexible application development<br />

framework<br />

• Create a NetMap client for data users<br />

• Provide an <strong>in</strong>terface with basic functions:<br />

– search, select, sort, count, etc. of data<br />

• Provide <strong>in</strong>terface with higher-order functions<br />

– E.g. data m<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g.<br />

• Use a “participatory design” process<br />

24


6. <strong>Integrative</strong> <strong>modes</strong> <strong>and</strong> <strong>metaphors</strong>:<br />

“ways of know<strong>in</strong>g”<br />

1. Popular symbol systems (astrology, tarot, leys, etc)<br />

2. Lists (selected, prioritized, nested, search hit lists)<br />

3. 2-D D Matrix (4-cell, n-cell) n<br />

4. Triangular mapp<strong>in</strong>g<br />

5. Complementarity diagrams (“correspondences(<br />

correspondences”)<br />

6. Network mapp<strong>in</strong>g (self-organiz<strong>in</strong>g network maps)<br />

7. Models, simulations, <strong>in</strong>teractive games<br />

8. Circular relationship maps (loop representation)<br />

9. Multi-media, sonification<br />

10. Mapp<strong>in</strong>g complexity plane (M<strong>and</strong>elbrot set fractal)<br />

11. Spherically configured 3-D 3 D structures (polyhedra, etc)<br />

12. Transformable structures , morphable images<br />

25


Mode 1: Traditional symbol systems<br />

26


Insights <strong>in</strong>to policy cycles <strong>in</strong> Imperial Ch<strong>in</strong>a<br />

27


H<strong>in</strong>du yantra<br />

28


Mode 2: Lists – unstructured <strong>and</strong> otherwise<br />

• Book of Lists<br />

• Prioritized lists (political “key issues”)<br />

• Nested lists (asystemic)<br />

– UN/OECD Macrothesaurus<br />

– Agenda 21<br />

• Hit lists (web search eng<strong>in</strong>e results)<br />

• Bulleted lists (as this slide !!!)<br />

30


Explor<strong>in</strong>g Intelligible Associations<br />

Ontological <strong>and</strong> process issues<br />

Part B: <strong>Integrative</strong> <strong>modes</strong> <strong>and</strong> <strong>metaphors</strong>:<br />

“ways of know<strong>in</strong>g”<br />

Anthony Judge <strong>and</strong> Nadia McLaren<br />

Union of International Associations<br />

at<br />

German Research Center for Artificial Intelligence GmbH<br />

(Saarl<strong>and</strong> University, Saarbrücken<br />

cken)


Mode 3: 2-D D Matrices<br />

• 4-cell (Wilber quadrants)<br />

• Input-Ouput diagrams (resources, account<strong>in</strong>g)<br />

• N-cell (Int. Concept Classification)<br />

• N-cell (UIA Functional classification)<br />

35


UIA Functional classification matrix<br />

36


Mode 4: Triangular mapp<strong>in</strong>g<br />

ICA Social process triangles framework<br />

37


Triangular relationships<br />

38


Mode 5: Complementarity diagrams<br />

(“correspondences”)<br />

UIA Interl<strong>in</strong>ked<br />

knowledgebases<br />

39


12 Languages of governance<br />

40


Mode 6: Network mapp<strong>in</strong>g<br />

• Static maps<br />

• Self-organiz<strong>in</strong>g network (“spr<strong>in</strong>g(<br />

spr<strong>in</strong>g”) ) maps<br />

• Touchgraph<br />

• Decision Explorer<br />

41


Knowledge organization relat<strong>in</strong>g to terror<br />

42


Strategic Decision Explorer<br />

43


Conference m<strong>in</strong>d-mapp<strong>in</strong>g<br />

mapp<strong>in</strong>g<br />

45


Conference m<strong>in</strong>d-mapp<strong>in</strong>g<br />

mapp<strong>in</strong>g<br />

46


VRML Example: Organizations - network<br />

47


Scalable vector graphics<br />

48


Problem loops susta<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g irresponsible policies<br />

49


Network spr<strong>in</strong>g map<br />

50


Mode 7: Models, simulations, <strong>in</strong>teractive<br />

games<br />

• Economic models<br />

• Limits to Growth<br />

• World modell<strong>in</strong>g<br />

• World build<strong>in</strong>g games<br />

51


Interactive modell<strong>in</strong>g: Soda constructor<br />

http://sodaplay.com/constructor/player.htm?<br />

52


Mode 8: Circular relationship maps<br />

& loop representation<br />

• Netmap<br />

• UIA maps<br />

• Loops<br />

53


Crop rotation as a policy metaphor<br />

Red policy “<strong>in</strong>”<br />

Mauve policy “<strong>in</strong>”<br />

Mauve “washed out”<br />

Blue “washed out”<br />

Blue policy “<strong>in</strong>”<br />

Illustration of<br />

a susta<strong>in</strong>able<br />

4-cycle policy<br />

Brown policy “<strong>in</strong>”<br />

Red “washed out”<br />

54


Progressive ref<strong>in</strong>ements of problem loops<br />

Date 1995 1999 1999 2000 2000<br />

Cha<strong>in</strong>s 9,519,722 15,000,000 46,474,882 16,091,877 1,239,769,768<br />

Profiles - - 6,891 1,217 12,397<br />

4-Loop 115 - - - 230<br />

5-Loop 527 - - - 473<br />

6-Loop 3,058 - - - 1,163<br />

7-Loop 3,568 - - - 3,473<br />

8-Loop excluded excluded excluded excluded 10,600<br />

9-Loop excluded excluded excluded excluded 35,438<br />

Total 7,303 6,000 15,958 8,253 51,555<br />

55


VRML Example: World problem loop <strong>in</strong>terlocks<br />

57


VRML Example: World problem loop <strong>in</strong>terlocks<br />

58


Netmap transaction analysis<br />

60


Mode 9: Multi-media, aesthetics<br />

• Multi-media:<br />

– Beyond text >> Visualization<br />

– Interactivity<br />

• Sonification<br />

– Comprehend<strong>in</strong>g complex pattern<br />

through sound<br />

62


Mode 10: Mapp<strong>in</strong>g complexity plane<br />

M<strong>and</strong>elbrot set fractal<br />

(vertical axis=“real<br />

real”, , negative at top; horizontal= “imag<strong>in</strong>ary”)<br />

63


Comprehensible mapp<strong>in</strong>g of complexity<br />

• Search for a “surface” onto which complexity can be<br />

mapped<br />

• Challenge of mapp<strong>in</strong>g strategic & value dilemmas<br />

• “Real” vs “Imag<strong>in</strong>ary”<br />

• Mapp<strong>in</strong>g network of terror (“real(<br />

real” <strong>and</strong> “imag<strong>in</strong>ary”)<br />

• Psycho-social social Significance of the M<strong>and</strong>elbrot Set: a<br />

susta<strong>in</strong>able boundary between chaos <strong>and</strong> order (2005)<br />

• Susta<strong>in</strong>ability through the Dynamics of Strategic<br />

Dilemmas: <strong>in</strong> the light of the coherence <strong>and</strong> visual form<br />

of the M<strong>and</strong>elbrot set (2005)<br />

64


Mode 11: Spherically configured 3-D 3<br />

structures<br />

• Polyhedra<br />

• Tensegrity ( (Syntegration)<br />

• Virtual reality<br />

• Spherical account<strong>in</strong>g<br />

65


VRML Example: Organizations (World Bank system)<br />

66


Tensegrity <strong>in</strong> virtual reality<br />

67


VRML Example: Organizations (EU system)<br />

69


Mode 12: Transformable structures ,<br />

morphable images<br />

• Vector equilibrium (“Jitterbug(<br />

Jitterbug”)<br />

• Morphable images<br />

73


Resonance hybrids: key to future susta<strong>in</strong>ability ?<br />

74


“Dodecameral” <strong>in</strong>tegration<br />

75


Transformations of vector equilibrium<br />

77


UIA L<strong>in</strong>ks<br />

Anthony Judge:<br />

Email: Anthony.Judge@gmail.com<br />

Web: http://www.laetus<strong>in</strong>praesens.org<br />

This presentation:<br />

http://www.laetus<strong>in</strong>praesens.org/docs00s/untelos2.pdf<br />

Associated text (<strong>and</strong> references):<br />

http://www.laetus<strong>in</strong>praesens.org/mus<strong>in</strong>gs/untelos.php<br />

UIA home page<br />

http://www.uia.org/<br />

Onl<strong>in</strong>e database access<br />

http://www.uia.org/data.htm<br />

78


Some related texts<br />

• Humour <strong>and</strong> Play-Fullness: essential <strong>in</strong>tegrative processes <strong>in</strong> governance, religion<br />

<strong>and</strong> transdiscipl<strong>in</strong>arity (2005)<br />

• Animat<strong>in</strong>g the Representation of Europe (2004)<br />

• Spherical Account<strong>in</strong>g: us<strong>in</strong>g geometry to embody developmental <strong>in</strong>tegrity<br />

(2004)<br />

• Simulat<strong>in</strong>g a Global Bra<strong>in</strong>: us<strong>in</strong>g networks of <strong>in</strong>ternational organizations, world<br />

problems, strategies, <strong>and</strong> values (2001)<br />

• Dynamically Gated Conceptual Communities: emergent patterns of isolation i<br />

with<strong>in</strong><br />

knowledge society (2004)<br />

• Knowledge Garden<strong>in</strong>g through Music: patterns of coherence for future ure African<br />

management as an alternative to Project Logic (2000)<br />

• Coherent Policy-mak<strong>in</strong>g Beyond the Information Barrier (1999)<br />

• From Information Highways to Songl<strong>in</strong>es of the Noosphere: : Global configuration of<br />

hypertext pathways for mean<strong>in</strong>gful collective transformation (1996)<br />

• Poetry mak<strong>in</strong>g <strong>and</strong> Policy mak<strong>in</strong>g: marry<strong>in</strong>g Beauty <strong>and</strong> the Beast (1993)<br />

• Aesthetics of Governance <strong>in</strong> the Year 2490 (1990)<br />

79

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!