28.04.2014 Views

Stakeholder Engagement Report - London Councils

Stakeholder Engagement Report - London Councils

Stakeholder Engagement Report - London Councils

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

2. Introduction<br />

2.1 Commissioning responsibilities<br />

Since April 2013, local authorities have had the responsibility for their local public<br />

health provision and commissioning. This includes responsibility for the Public Health<br />

Outcomes Framework (PHOF), commissioning NHS Health Checks, smoking cessation,<br />

well-being, substance misuse, sexual health promotion and HIV prevention work. This<br />

includes sexual health service provision, primarily contraception and GUM (genito urinary<br />

medicine). They have taken on this critical role for local health improvement at a time of<br />

growing demand and diminishing resources.<br />

In <strong>London</strong> the 33 <strong>London</strong> councils are now the commissioners for HIV prevention.<br />

Specific commissioning arrangements vary across the city, with some multi-borough<br />

arrangements, as well as individual borough commissioning, taking place. All have the<br />

same sexual health commissioning responsibilities, which are:<br />

• HIV and sexual health promotion<br />

• Open access Genito-urinary medicine (GUM)<br />

• Contraceptive services for all ages<br />

<strong>Stakeholder</strong>s taking part in the needs assessment acknowledge that <strong>London</strong> councils now<br />

have to understand the complex and fragmented challenges posed by HIV prevention.<br />

They felt the need for cooperation and communication between all stakeholders, confident<br />

leadership, and excellent commissioning relationships in order to ensure seamless<br />

pathways between clinical and other support services for patients and service users.<br />

2.2 HIV prevention and local government<br />

<strong>London</strong> Local Authorities account for 18 out of the 20 Local Authorities with the highest<br />

HIV prevalence in the country. (PHE Review of HIV epidemiology in <strong>London</strong> 2011 data;<br />

October 2013) The anticipated lifetime costs for treatment and care (including social<br />

care) of those living with HIV are extremely high. Primary and secondary HIV prevention<br />

work is considered to be a major priority for public health. In view of financial constraints,<br />

Local Authorities as the statutory bodies responsible for their localities will have inherent<br />

tensions as to what should be provided at borough or on a <strong>London</strong> wide basis. They<br />

will also need to consider a whole system management approach, which respects the<br />

sovereignty of each <strong>London</strong> council, and their individual population needs, without<br />

creating unreasonable inequalities of access and outcomes for HIV prevention.<br />

<strong>London</strong> councils are in a strong position to exercise their roles and functions for sexual<br />

health, deliver improved outcomes for their residents, contain and reduce costs and work<br />

proactively with partners. Making the right decisions will be critical if the changes are to<br />

be supported by the many people they affect – local residents, service users, health and<br />

social care and other professionals alike.<br />

The Equality Act 2010 states that public sector bodies: -<br />

6<br />

“Must, when making decisions of a strategic nature about how to exercise its<br />

functions, have due regard to the desirability of exercising them in a way that is<br />

designed to reduce the inequalities of outcome which result from socio-economic<br />

disadvantage.”

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!