28.04.2014 Views

Lecture Notes - Department of Mathematics and Statistics - Queen's ...

Lecture Notes - Department of Mathematics and Statistics - Queen's ...

Lecture Notes - Department of Mathematics and Statistics - Queen's ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

44CHAPTER 4. MARTINGALES AND FOSTER-LYAPUNOV CRITERIA FOR STABILIZATION OF MARKOV CHAINS<br />

4.3.1 Lyapunov conditions: Geometric ergodicity<br />

Roberts <strong>and</strong> Rosenthal use this approach to establish geometric ergodicity.<br />

An irreducible Markov chain satisfies the univariate drift condition if there are constants λ ∈ (0, 1) <strong>and</strong> b < ∞,<br />

along with a function W : X → [1, ∞), <strong>and</strong> a small set C such that<br />

PV ≤ λV + b1 C . (4.12)<br />

One can now define a bivariate drift condition for two independent copies <strong>of</strong> a Markov chain with a small set C.<br />

This condition requires that there exists a function h : X × X → [1, ∞) <strong>and</strong> α > 1 such that<br />

where<br />

¯Ph(x, y) ≤h(x, y)/α (x, y) /∈ C × C<br />

¯Ph(x, y) b<br />

1−λ<br />

− 1, then the<br />

bivariate drift condition is satisfied for h(x, y) = 1 2 (V (x) + V (y)) <strong>and</strong> α−1 = λ + b/(d + 1) > 1.<br />

The bivariate condition ensures that the processes x, x ′ hits the set C × C, from where the two chains may be<br />

coupled. The coupling inequality then leads to the desired conclusion.<br />

Theorem 4.3.3 (Theorem 9 <strong>of</strong> [28]) Suppose {x t } is an aperiodic, irreducible Markov chain with invariant<br />

distribution π(·). Suppose C is a (1, ǫ, ν)-small set <strong>and</strong> V :→ [1, ∞) satisfies the univariate drift condition (4.12)<br />

with constants λ ∈ (0, 1) <strong>and</strong> b < ∞ with V (x) < ∞ for some x ∈ X. Then {x t } is geometrically ergodic.<br />

As a side remark, we note the following observation. If the univariate drift condition holds then the sequence <strong>of</strong><br />

r<strong>and</strong>om variables M n = λ −n V (x n ) − n−1 ∑<br />

b1 C (x k ) is a supermartingale <strong>and</strong> thus we have the inequality<br />

k=0<br />

for all n <strong>and</strong> x 0 ∈ X, <strong>and</strong> with Theorem 3.3.4 we also have<br />

for all B ∈ B + (X).<br />

n−1<br />

∑<br />

E x0 [λ −n V (x n )] ≤ V (x 0 ) + E x0 [ b1 C (x k )] (4.13)<br />

k=0<br />

E x [λ −τB ] ≤ V (x) + c(B)<br />

4.3.2 Subgeometric ergodicity<br />

Here, we review the class <strong>of</strong> subgeometric rate functions (see section 4 <strong>of</strong> [16], section 5 <strong>of</strong> [12], [23], [13], [30]).<br />

Let Λ 0 be the family <strong>of</strong> functions r : N → R >0 such that<br />

r is non-decreasing, r(1) ≥ 2<br />

<strong>and</strong><br />

log r(n)<br />

n<br />

↓ 0<br />

as n → ∞

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!