28.04.2014 Views

Designing Capacity Development for Disaster Risk Management : A ...

Designing Capacity Development for Disaster Risk Management : A ...

Designing Capacity Development for Disaster Risk Management : A ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

1. Analysis of project context<br />

1. Analysis of project context <br />

What is the general rationale and context <strong>for</strong> the project? <br />

When involved in designing a <br />

capacity development project <strong>for</strong> <br />

disaster risk management, it is <br />

crucial to start the process by <br />

contemplating and <strong>for</strong>mulating the <br />

general rationale <strong>for</strong> the project. <br />

In other words, we need to <br />

describe in short why the project <br />

is necessary in the first place. <br />

Being explicit and transparent <br />

about the reasons <strong>for</strong> the potential <br />

project, as well as <strong>for</strong> engaging in <br />

the process of designing it, is <br />

fundamental <strong>for</strong> building trust <br />

among stakeholders, <strong>for</strong> creating <br />

commitment, and ultimately <strong>for</strong> <br />

project effectiveness. The output <br />

of such dialogue will then be used <br />

as input to the coming steps. <br />

1 Analysis of project context<br />

2 Stakeholder analysis<br />

3 Situation analysis<br />

4 Objectives analysis<br />

5 Plan of activities<br />

6 Resource planning<br />

7 Indicators<br />

8 Internal risk analysis and management<br />

9 Analysis of assumptions<br />

Figure 3. Step 1 in LFA <br />

In this initial phase of the project design process it is also <br />

important to consider that the notion of “development”, in the <br />

concept of capacity development, may carry different meanings to <br />

different people. What is considered an improvement <strong>for</strong> one <br />

stakeholder may not be considered an improvement by another 18 . <br />

For example, a governmental authority in charge of disaster <br />

preparedness may view better capacity to distribute donated <br />

clothes to disaster affected communities as development, while <br />

women involved in local clothing production loose their <br />

livelihood if their market is flooded with free <strong>for</strong>eign clothes and <br />

may not view that change as development at all. It is thus <br />

essential to think about and present what is to be considered <br />

“development” in the particular project. <br />

5

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!