04-26-11
04-26-11
04-26-11
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
DON516120<strong>11</strong><br />
NYCAL<br />
I.A.S. Part 30<br />
Hon. Sherry Klein Heitler, J.S.C.<br />
ERNEST J. HORNEY, JR, and ROSEMARY HORNEY,<br />
Index No.:<br />
-against-<br />
Plaintiffs,<br />
NO OPPOSITION SUMMARY JUDGMENT<br />
MOTION AND ORDER<br />
A.O. SMITH WATER PRODUCTS, et al. including,<br />
FOSTER WHEELER CORPORATION,<br />
Defendants.<br />
WHEREFORE, defendant FOSTER WHEELER, L.L.C. (sued herein as “FOSTER WHEELER<br />
CORPORATION”) hereby request summary judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil<br />
Practice Law and Rules Section 3212, dismissing plaintiffs’ complaint against defendant FOSTER<br />
WHEELER, L.L.C. with prejudice, and there being no opposition thereto,<br />
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against defendant<br />
FOSTER WHEELER, L.L.C. be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and without costs.<br />
%<br />
Sedgwick, Dennis E. Vega, Detert, Moran & Arnold, LLP<br />
Weitx & Luxenberg, P.C.<br />
Attorney f or Plaintiffs<br />
Attorneys for Foster Wheeler, L. L.C.<br />
700 Broadway<br />
Three Gateway Center, 12‘h Floor<br />
New York, New York 1000 Newark, NJ 07102<br />
SO ORDERED,<br />
APR 2 6 20<strong>11</strong>
NYCAL<br />
I.A.S. Part 30<br />
Hon. Sherry Klein Heitler, J.S.C.<br />
THOMAS CARROLL et al.,<br />
-against-<br />
Plaintiff,<br />
Index No.:<br />
<strong>11</strong>9491<br />
NO OPPOSITION SUMMARY JUDGMENT<br />
MOTION AND ORDER<br />
A.C. &S. INC., et at. including,<br />
FOSTER WHEELER CORPORATION,<br />
Defendants.<br />
WHEREFORE, defendant FOSTER WHEELER, L.L.C. (sued herein as “FOSTER WHEELER<br />
.<br />
CORPORATION”) hereby request summary judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil<br />
Practice Law and Rules Section 3212, dismissing plaintiffs‘ complaint against defendant FOSTER<br />
WHEELER, L.L.C. with prejudice, and there being no opposition thereto,<br />
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against defendant<br />
FOSTER WHEELER, L.L.C. be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and without costs.<br />
Weitz & Luxenberg, P.C.<br />
Attorney for Plaintffs<br />
700 Broadway<br />
New York, New York 10003<br />
Sedgwick, Detert, Maran & Arnold, LLP<br />
Attorneys for Foster Wheeler, L. L.C.<br />
Three Gateway Center, 1Zfh Floor<br />
Newark, NJ 07102<br />
F\LED<br />
SO ORDERED,<br />
NJb41735vl
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK<br />
COUNTY OF NEW YORK<br />
WHEREFORE, defendant Patterson-Kelley Company, sued herein as Patterson-Kelley<br />
Division, hereby requests summary judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil<br />
Practice Law and Rules Section 3212, dismissing plaintiffs complaint against defendant<br />
Patterson-Kelley Division with prejudice, and there being no opposition thereto,<br />
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against<br />
defendant Patterson-Kelley Division, be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and<br />
without costs.<br />
By:<br />
Samuel Goldblatt, Es<br />
Benjamin R. Dwyer Esq.<br />
NIXON PEABODY LLP<br />
Attorneys for Plaintiff<br />
Attorneys for Defendant,<br />
180 Maiden Lane Patterson-Kelley Comp<br />
New York, NY 10038 Key Towers at Fop *<br />
(212) 558-5500 40 Fountain Plazais<br />
Buffalo, NY 14202<br />
(716) 853-8100<br />
APT? 2 6 20<strong>11</strong><br />
SO ORDERED,<br />
APRCf! ?O <strong>11</strong><br />
NEW/ YQRK<br />
NT~ CLERK'S OFFICE'<br />
13381246. I
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK<br />
ALL COUNTIES WITHIN NEW YORK CITY<br />
..................................... -X NY CAL<br />
IN RE: NEW YORK COUNTY I.A.S. Part 30<br />
ASBESTOS LITIGATION<br />
(Judge Heitler)<br />
____________________------------------<br />
X<br />
This Document Relates to: Index No.: 1<strong>04</strong>095/98<br />
Giovanni Petrone and Mary Petrone,<br />
- against -<br />
Plaintiffs,<br />
NO OPPOSITION<br />
SUMMARY JUDGMENT<br />
A.C. & S., Inc., et al.,<br />
MOTION AND ORDER<br />
Defendants.<br />
....................................... -X<br />
WHEREFORE, defendant Mario & DiBono Plastering Co. Inc.,<br />
hereby requests summary judgment in the above-entitled case,<br />
pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section §3212,<br />
dismissing plaintiffs' Complaint against defendant Mario E<br />
DiBono Plastering Co. Inc., with prejudice, and there being nc<br />
opposition thereto,<br />
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims<br />
and cross claims against defendant Mario & DiBono Plastering Cod<br />
Inc., be dismissed with prejudice and without costs<br />
Attorneys for Plaintiffs<br />
Attorneys for Defendant<br />
Giovanni Petrone and Mary<br />
Mario & DiBono Plastering Co.<br />
Petrone<br />
Inc.<br />
700 Broadway, 6th Floor 177 Montague Street<br />
New York, New York 10003 Brooklyn, New York <strong>11</strong>201<br />
(718) 855-9000<br />
.: 10924-6456<br />
So Ordered:
TMc:CCCjpk)<br />
4<strong>11</strong><strong>11</strong> 1<br />
WHEREFORE, defendant Consolidated Edison Company of New York, Inc.<br />
hereby requests summary judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law<br />
and Rules Section 3212, dismissing plaintiffs complaint against defendant Consolidated Edison<br />
Company of New York, Inc. with prejudice, and there being no opposition thereto,<br />
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross-claims<br />
against defendant Consolidated Edison Company of New York, Inc., be and the same are hereby<br />
dismissed with prejudice and without costs.<br />
Attorneys for Plaintiff<br />
700 Broadway<br />
New York, NY 100035<br />
York, Inc.<br />
41rving~lace F I L E D<br />
New York. NY 10003-3598<br />
SO ORDERED:<br />
Our File No<br />
S-4986-98
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW Y OK<br />
COUNTY OF NEW YORK<br />
WHEREFORE, defendant Patterson-Kelley Company, sued herein as Patterson-Kelle!<br />
Division, hereby requests summary judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil<br />
Practice Law and Rules Section 3212, dismissing plaintiff's complaint against defendant<br />
Patterson-Kelley Division with prejudice, and there being no opposition thereto,<br />
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against<br />
defendant Patterson-Kelley Division, be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and<br />
without costs.<br />
Dated: New York, NY<br />
+/jL. , 20<strong>11</strong><br />
By: &W<br />
fllehd %WC/I,Esq.<br />
WEITZ & LUXENBERG, P.C.<br />
Attorneys for Plaintiff<br />
By:<br />
Samuel mdblatt, E<br />
Benjamin R. Dwyer<br />
NIXON PEABODY LLP<br />
Attorneys for Defendant,<br />
180 Maiden Lane Patterson-Kelley Company<br />
New York, NY 10038<br />
Key Towers at Fountain<br />
(212) 558-5500 40 Fountain Plaz Q<br />
Buffalo, NY 1420<br />
TUP<br />
53-8100<br />
APR 2 6 '20'<br />
SO ORDERED,<br />
13409973.1<br />
APR 15 20<strong>11</strong>
----"_""___________________I____________------------------------"---"-"---<br />
TMc:CCCjpk)<br />
4<strong>11</strong><strong>11</strong> 1<br />
a<br />
----_"-____-____________________________------<br />
WDEX NO.<br />
IN RE NEW YORK CITY ASBESTOS LITIGATION, <strong>11</strong>0289/98 an <strong>11</strong>1058/98<br />
ASSIGNED TO:<br />
THIS DOCUMENT RELATES TO:<br />
HON. SHERRY KLEIN HEITLER<br />
NO OPPOSITION SUMMARY<br />
WHEREFORE, defendant Consolidated Edison Company of New York, Tnc.<br />
hereby requests summary judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law<br />
and RuIes Section 3212, dismissing plaintiffs complaint against defendant Consolidated Edison<br />
Company of New York, Inc. with prejudice, and there being no opposition thereto,<br />
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross-claims<br />
against defendant Consolidated Edison Company of New York, Inc,, be and the same are hereby<br />
dismissed with prejudice and without costs.<br />
Attorneys for Plaintiff<br />
700 Broadway<br />
New York, NY 100035<br />
Edison Company of New<br />
New York, NY 10003-3598<br />
S-4986-98
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK<br />
ALL COUNTIES WITHIN NEW YORK CITY<br />
X<br />
IN RE: NEW YORK COUNTY I.A.S. Part 30<br />
ASBESTOS LITIGATION<br />
(Judge Heitler)<br />
_____----------__l_-______________l__l<br />
X<br />
This Document Relates to: Index No.: <strong>11</strong>2919/98<br />
BRIAN J. MCGUIRE<br />
NO-OPPOSITION<br />
SUMMARY JUDGMENT<br />
__________----------___llll__<br />
NYCAL<br />
- against -<br />
Plaintiff,<br />
MOTION AND ORDER<br />
A.C. &<br />
S., INC., et al.,<br />
WHEREFORE, defendant BURNHAM LLC, hereby requests summar!,<br />
judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice LaL\ 7<br />
and Rules Section 53212, dismissing plaintiffs' Complaint against:<br />
defendant BURNHAM LLC, with prejudice, and there being nc<br />
opposition thereto,<br />
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims ano I<br />
cross claims against defendant BURNHAM LLC, be dismissed with<br />
prejudice and without costs.<br />
Attorneys for Plaintiff Attorneys for Defendant<br />
Brian J. McGuire<br />
Burn ham L LC<br />
700 Broadway, 6"h Floor 177 Montague Street<br />
New York, New York 10003 Brooklyn, New York <strong>11</strong>20 FI<br />
212-558-5500 (718) 855-9000<br />
Our File No.: <strong>11</strong>084-2<strong>11</strong>2 ApR 2 6<br />
23'<strong>11</strong><br />
D
-_l-_f----____________________l_ll____<br />
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK<br />
ALL COUNTIES WITHIN NEW YORK CITY<br />
_______l__lll________--___--_-----------<br />
X<br />
IN RE:<br />
NEW YORK COUNTY<br />
ASBESTOS LITIGATION<br />
X<br />
This Document Relates to:<br />
Ara Ne<strong>11</strong> Murphy, Individually, and Jan<br />
Marie Murphy as Executrix for the Estate<br />
of James F. Murphy,<br />
Plaintiffs,<br />
- against -<br />
A.C. & S.,<br />
Inc., et al.,<br />
NYCAL<br />
I.A.S. Part 30<br />
(Judge Heitler)<br />
Index No.: <strong>11</strong>3121/98<br />
NO OPPOSITION<br />
SUMMARY JUDGMENT<br />
MOTION AND ORDER<br />
Defendants.<br />
__________________-__________________ -X<br />
WHEREFORE, defendant Mario & DiBono Plastering Co. Inc.,<br />
hereby requests summary judgment in the above-entitled case,<br />
pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section §3212,<br />
dismissing plaintiffs' Complaint against defendant Mario E<br />
DiBono Plastering Co. Inc., with prejudice, and there being nc<br />
opposition thereto,<br />
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claimE<br />
and cross claims against defendant Mario & DiBono Plastering Co.<br />
Inc., be dismissed with prejudice and without cost E#=<br />
APR 2 6 20<strong>11</strong><br />
D<br />
Cugen and Dykman LLP<br />
Attorneys for Plaintiffs<br />
Attorneys for Defendant<br />
Ara Ne<strong>11</strong> Murphy, Individually Maxio & DiBono Plastering Co.<br />
and Jan Marie Murphy as<br />
Inc.<br />
Executrix for the Estate of 177 Montague Street<br />
James F. Murphy Brooklyn, New York <strong>11</strong>201<br />
700 Broadway, 6th Floor 5+:. a 00 0<br />
New York, New York 1000 e NO.: 10924-1831<br />
So Ordered:<br />
Hon. Sherry K. Heitler
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK<br />
COUNTY OF NEW YORK<br />
IN RE: NEW YORK CITY<br />
ASBESTOS LITIGATION<br />
NYCAL<br />
I.A.S. Part 30<br />
CHARLES J. HENRY and MARILYN HENRY,<br />
Index No.:<br />
-against-<br />
Plaintiffs,<br />
NO OPPOSITION SUMMARY JUDGMENT<br />
MOTION AND ORDER<br />
A.C. &S. INC., et at. including,<br />
FOSTER WHEELER CORPORATION,<br />
Defendants.<br />
WHEREFORE, defendant FOSTER WHEELER, L.L.C. (sued herein as “FOSTER WHEELER<br />
CORPORATION”) hereby request summary judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil<br />
Practice Law and Rules Section 3212, dismissing plaintiffs’ complaint against defendant FOSTER<br />
WHEELER, L.L.C. with prejudice, and there being no opposition thereto,<br />
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against defendant<br />
FOSTER WHEELER, L.L.C. be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and without costs.<br />
Frank Ortiz, Esq.<br />
Weitz 8t Luxenberg, P.C.<br />
Attorney for Plain tffs<br />
700 Broadway<br />
New York, New York 1000<br />
Attorneys for Foster Wheeler, L. L.C.<br />
Three Gateway Center, 12fh Floor<br />
Newark, NJ 07102<br />
SO ORDERED,<br />
APR 2 6 20<strong>11</strong><br />
NEW YQRK<br />
COUNTY CLERKS OFFICE’<br />
NU341752vl
I.A.S. Part 30<br />
Hon. Sherry Klein Heitler, J.S.C.<br />
JOAN LEVESQUE as Administratrix for the Estate of JOSEPH<br />
LEVESQUE and JOAN LEVESQUE, Individually,<br />
Index No.:<br />
/\122034-1.<br />
-against-<br />
Plaintiffs,<br />
NO OPPOSITION SUMMARY JUDGMENT<br />
MOTION AND ORDER<br />
A.O. SMITH WATER PRODULTTS, et al, including,<br />
FOSTER WHEELER CORPORATION,<br />
Defendants.<br />
WHEREFORE, defendant FOSTER WHEELER, L.L.C. (sued herein as "FOSTER WHEELER<br />
CORPORATION") hereby request summary judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil<br />
Practice Law and Rules Section 3212, dismissing plaintiffs' complaint against defendant FOSTER<br />
WHEELER, L.L.C. with prejudice, and there being no opposition thereto,<br />
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against defendant<br />
FOSTER WHEELER, L.L.C, be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and without costs.<br />
Frank Ortiz, Esq.<br />
Weitz & Luxenberg, P.C.<br />
Attorney for Plaintvfs<br />
700 Broadway<br />
fi<br />
Dennis E. Vega, Esq.<br />
Sedgwick, Detert, Moran & Arnold, LLP<br />
Attorneys for Foster Wheeler, L. L.C.<br />
Three Gateway Center, 12fh Floor<br />
r i ~ YORK \ ~
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK<br />
ALL COUNTIES WITHIN NEW YORK CITY<br />
_________________l__II_______________<br />
-X NYCAL<br />
IN RE: NEW YORK COUNTY I.A.S. Part 30<br />
ASBESTOS LITIGATION<br />
(Judge Heitler)<br />
-----l-------------____________f_f_l__<br />
X<br />
This Document Relates to: Index No.: 100050/99<br />
Mary Jean Massaro, Individually and as<br />
Administratrix for the Estate of Joseph<br />
A. Massaro Jr.,<br />
Plaintiff,<br />
- against - NO OPPOSITION<br />
SUMMARY JUDGMENT<br />
A.C. .& S., Inc., et al.,<br />
MOTION AND ORDER<br />
Defendants.<br />
--_-_------I-------_________________<br />
-X<br />
WHEREFORE, defendant Mario & DiBono Plastering Co. Inc.,<br />
hereby requests summary judgment in the above-entitled case,<br />
pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 53212,<br />
dismissing plaintiffs' Complaint against defendant Mario 6<br />
DiBono Plastering Co. Inc., with prejudice, and there being ncr<br />
opposition thereto,<br />
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims<br />
and cross claims against defendant Mario & DiBono Plastering Co<br />
i<br />
Inc., be dismissed with prejudice and without CostsF I L E 4<br />
Mary Jean Massaro, Individually Mario & DiBono Plastering Co.<br />
and as Administratrix for the Inc.<br />
Estate of John A. Massaro Jr. 177 Montague Street<br />
700 Broadway, 6th Floor Brooklyn, New York <strong>11</strong>201<br />
New York, New York 10003<br />
10924-6466<br />
So Ordered:<br />
Hon. Sherry K. Heitler
NYCAL<br />
I.A.S. Part 30<br />
Hon. Sherry Klein Heitler, J.S.C.<br />
ERNEST J. HORNEY, JR, and ROSEMARY HORNEY,<br />
Index No.:<br />
-against-<br />
Plaintiffs,<br />
NO OPPOSITION SUMMARY JUDGMENT<br />
MOTION AND ORDER<br />
A.O. SMITH WATER PRODUCTS, et al. including,<br />
FOSTER WHEELER CORPORATION,<br />
Defendants.<br />
WHEREFORE, defendant FOSTER WHEELER, L.L.C. (sued herein as “FOSTER WHEELER<br />
CORPORATION”) hereby request summary judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil<br />
Practice Law and Rules Section 3212, dismissing plaintiffs’ complaint against defendant FOSTER<br />
WHEELER, L.L.C. with prejudice, and there being no opposition thereto,<br />
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against defendant<br />
FOSTER WHEELER, L.L.C. be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and without costs.<br />
n-<br />
Frank Ortiz, Esq.<br />
Weitz & Luxenberg, P.C.<br />
Attorney for Plaintvfs<br />
700 Broadway<br />
New York, New York 1000<br />
SO ORDERED,<br />
Dennis E. V e g w<br />
Sedgwick, Detert, Moran & Arnold, LLP<br />
Attorneys for Foster Wheeler, L. L.C.<br />
Three Gateway Center, 12th Floor<br />
Newark, NJ 07102<br />
FILED<br />
APR 2 6 20<strong>11</strong><br />
NJ/34 I756v 1
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK<br />
COUNTY OF NEW YORK<br />
LILLIAN P. CARPENTER, as Executrix for the<br />
Estate of GERALD CLAYTON CARPENTER,<br />
A.C. & S., INC., et al.,<br />
Plaintiffls),<br />
-against-<br />
: NYCAL<br />
: I.A.S. Part 30<br />
: (Hon. Sheny Klein Heitler)<br />
1 Index No.: 106083-99<br />
NO-OPPOSITION SUMMARY<br />
JUDGMENT MOTION AND<br />
: ORDER<br />
WHEREFORE, defendant CRANE CO. hereby requests summary judgment in the<br />
above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212, dismissing<br />
plaintiffs' complaint against defendant CRANE CO. with prejudice, and there being no<br />
opposition thereto,<br />
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against<br />
defendant CRANE CO. be, and the same are hereby, dismissed with prejudice and without costs,<br />
Dated: 3 \3@\ \\<br />
Newxork, New York<br />
Attorneys for Plaintiff(s)<br />
700 Broadway<br />
New York, NY 10003<br />
(212) 558-5500<br />
Kirst<br />
P<br />
Alford Kneis, Esq.<br />
K& GATESLLP<br />
At rneys for Defendant<br />
CRANE CO.<br />
599 Lexington Ave<br />
New York, NY 100
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW Y ON<br />
COUNTY OF NEW YORK<br />
IN RE: NEW YORK CITY ASBESTOS LITIGATION<br />
FREDERICK A. TOLI and DOLORES IOLI,<br />
Plaintiff(s),<br />
-against-<br />
A.C, & S., INC., et al.,<br />
Defendants.<br />
* NYCAL<br />
: I.A,S, Part 30<br />
: (Hon. Sherry Klein Heihzr)<br />
: Index No: 10791 3-99<br />
NO-OPPOSITION SUMMARY<br />
JUDGMENT MOTION AND ORDER<br />
WHEREFORE, defendant CRANE CO. hereby requests summary judgment in the<br />
I<br />
above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212, dismissing<br />
plaintiffs' complaint against defendant CRANE CO. with prejudice, and there being no<br />
opposition thereto,<br />
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against<br />
defendant CRANE CO. be, and the same are hereby, dismissed with prejudice and without costs.<br />
Dated:<br />
3\3a\\\<br />
Frank Ortiz, Esq.<br />
Attorneys for Plaintiff(s)<br />
700 Broadway CRANE CO.<br />
New York, NY 10003 599 Lexington Avep e NEW \/ORK<br />
(212) 558-5500 New York, NY 1002bW CLERRS<br />
(2 12) 536-3900<br />
SO ORDERED,<br />
Hon. Sherry Klein Heitler<br />
^ .
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK<br />
COUNTY OF NEW YORK<br />
IN RE: NEW YORK CITY ASBESTOS LITIGATION<br />
This Document Relates To:<br />
KENNETH J. GARY, as Personal * hTX7I- ~r<br />
1Y 1 LAL<br />
Representative for the Estate of JOHN GARY, : Part 3o<br />
and DEANNA GARY, Individually,<br />
(Hon. Sherry Klein Heitler)<br />
A.C. & S., INC., et al.,<br />
-against-<br />
Plaintiff(s),<br />
Defendants.<br />
Index No: <strong>11</strong>7282-99<br />
: NO-OPPOSITION SUMMARY<br />
JUDGMENT MOTION AND ORDER<br />
WHEREFORE, defendant CRANE CO. hereby requests summary judgment in the<br />
above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 32 12, dismissing<br />
plaintiffs' complaint against defendant CRANE CO. with prejudice, and there being no<br />
opposition thereto,<br />
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against<br />
defendant CRANE CO. be, and the same are hereby, dismissed with prejudice and without costs.<br />
Dated: 3 \ 3r~3 \ \ \<br />
New York. New York<br />
Attorneys for Plaintiff(s)<br />
700 Broadway<br />
New York, NY 10003<br />
Attorneys for Defendant<br />
CRANE CO.<br />
599 Lexington Avenue APR 2 6 20<strong>11</strong><br />
(212) 558-5500 New York, NY 10022-6030<br />
- (212) 536-3900<br />
SO ORDERED,<br />
Hon. Sherry Klein Heitler<br />
NEW YORK<br />
COUNTY CLERK'S OFFiCt
__________________II_________l_lr_______----------------------- X<br />
m. * UPR RE ME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK<br />
COUNTY OF NEW YORK<br />
________I_______________r_____r_________-----------"-----------<br />
IN RE:NEW YORK CITY<br />
ASBESTOS LITIGATION<br />
This Document Relates To:<br />
REGINA ACKERMAN, as Executrix of the<br />
Estate of FRANK J. COPPOLA,<br />
-against-<br />
Plaintiff,<br />
X<br />
s= ?/<br />
Index No. 99- 12 1 144<br />
NO OPPOSITION SUMMARY<br />
JUDGMENT MOTION<br />
AND ORDER<br />
L<br />
i<br />
WHEREFORE, defendant Maremont Corporation hereby requests summary judgment in<br />
the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212, dismissing<br />
plaintiffs complaint against defendant Marernont Corporation with prejudice, and there being no<br />
opposition thereto,<br />
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against<br />
defendant Maremont Corporation be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and<br />
without costs.<br />
Dated: New York, New York<br />
pfa- w-, 201 1<br />
<strong>11</strong>% -<br />
TJ&&/FZ. ,&OGC? I Esq. Peggy L. Pan, Esq.<br />
WEITZ & LUXENBERG, P.C.<br />
KASOWITZ, BENSON, TORRES &<br />
Attorneys for Plaintiff<br />
FRIEDMAN LLP<br />
700 Broadway AttorneysforDefindant 3 'C I E D<br />
New York, NY 10003<br />
1633 Broadway<br />
(212) 558-5500<br />
NewYork,New York 10019 APR<br />
--"(212) 20,,<br />
506-1700<br />
SO ORDERED,<br />
NEW YORH<br />
COUNTY CLERK'$QFF@@<br />
Hon. Sherry Klein Heitler<br />
APR 15 20<strong>11</strong><br />
I<br />
I
NYCAL<br />
I.A.S. Part 30<br />
Hon. Sherry Klein Heitler, J.S.C.<br />
COSMA LERUZIC, as Executrix for the Estate of PETER F.<br />
LERUZIC and COSMA LERUZIC, Individually,<br />
-against-<br />
Plaintiffs,<br />
NO OPPOSITION SUMMARY JUDGMENT<br />
MOTION AND ORDER<br />
A.O. SMITH WATER PRODUCE, et al. including,<br />
FOSTER WHEELER CORPORATION,<br />
Defendants.<br />
_____________""_rr______________________---------"-~--------------~--- X<br />
WHEREFORE, defendant FOSTER WHEELER, L.L.C. (sued herein as "FOSTER WHEELER<br />
CORPORATION") hereby request summary judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil<br />
Practice Law and Rules Section 3212, dismissing plaintiffs' complaint against defendant FOSTER<br />
WHEELER, L.L.C. with prejudice, and there being no opposition thereto,<br />
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against defendant<br />
FOSTER WHEELER, L.L.C. be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and without costs.<br />
- ...<br />
Frank Ortiz, Esq.<br />
Weitz & Luxenberg, P.C.<br />
Attorney for Plaintffs<br />
700 Broadway<br />
New York, New York 1000<br />
k<br />
Sedgwick, Dennis E. Vega, Detert, Esq. Moran & Arnold, LLP<br />
Attorneys for Faster Wheeler,, L. L.C.<br />
Three Gateway Center, 12'h Floor<br />
Newark, NJ 07102<br />
SO ORPERED,<br />
15 20<strong>11</strong><br />
NJD41757vl
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK<br />
COUNTY OF NEW YORK<br />
PHYLLIS GACH, Individually and as Proposed<br />
Executrix for the Estate of MICHAEL GACH,<br />
A.C. & S., INC., et al.,<br />
Plaintiff(s),<br />
-against-<br />
Defendants.<br />
I.A.S. Part 30<br />
: (Hon. Sherry Klein Heitler)<br />
: Index No(s),: <strong>11</strong>2375-02;<br />
&Z%<br />
NO-OPPOSITION SUMMARY<br />
: JUDGMENT MOTION AND<br />
ORDER<br />
WHEREFORE, defendant CRANE CO. hereby requests summary judgment in the<br />
above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 32 12, dismissing<br />
plaintiffs complaint against defendant CRANE CO. with prejudice, and there being no<br />
opposition thereto,<br />
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against<br />
defendant CRANE CO. be, and the same are hereby, dismissed with prejudice and without costs.<br />
Dated: 3 \ 30 \ [\,<br />
ork, New York<br />
Attorneys for Plaintiff(s)<br />
700 Broadway CRANE CO.<br />
New York, NY 10003<br />
599 Lexington Aven<br />
(212) 558-5500<br />
New York, NY 10022<br />
(212) 536-3900<br />
n
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK<br />
ALL COUNTIES WITHIN NEW YORK CITY<br />
------________________________I______<br />
-X<br />
IN RE:<br />
NEW YORK COUNTY<br />
ASBESTOS LITIGATION<br />
______________________I______________<br />
-X<br />
This Document Relates to:<br />
Janet W. Fitzgerald, as Executrix for<br />
the Estate of Adolph V. Weber,<br />
NYCAL<br />
I.A.S. Part 30<br />
(Judge Heitler)<br />
Index No.: 125761/99<br />
- against -<br />
A.C. & S., Inc., et al.,<br />
Plaintiff,<br />
NO OPPOSITION<br />
SUMMARY JUDGMENT<br />
MOTION AND ORDER<br />
Defendants.<br />
I______________________________I______<br />
X<br />
WHEREFORE, defendant Mario & DiBono Plastering Co. Inc.,<br />
hereby requests summary judgment in the above-entitled case,<br />
pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section §3212,<br />
dismissing plaintiffs' Complaint against defendant Mario 6<br />
DiBono Plastering Co.<br />
Inc., with prejudice, and there being nc<br />
opposition thereto,<br />
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims<br />
and<br />
Inc<br />
cross claims against defendant Mario & DiBono Plastering Co.<br />
, be dismissed with prejudice and without cos D<br />
Dated:<br />
Brooklyn, New York<br />
41 2 , 20<strong>11</strong><br />
3/yJ//<br />
SamGe1 M. Mdirowitz, Esq.<br />
Weitz & Luxenberg, P.C.<br />
len and D<br />
Attorneys for Plaintiff<br />
Janet W. Fitzgerald, as<br />
Mario & DiBono Plastering Co.<br />
Executrix for the Estate of Inc.<br />
Adolph V. Weber 177 Montague Street<br />
700 Broadway, 6th Floor Brooklyn, New York <strong>11</strong>201<br />
New York, New York 10003<br />
So Ordered:<br />
Hon. Sherry K. Heitler<br />
?'?q! 0924 - 6460
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK<br />
COUNTY OF NEW YORK<br />
WHEREFORE, defendant Patterson-Kelley Company, sued herein as Patterson-Kelley<br />
Division, hereby requests summary judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil<br />
Practice Law and Rules Section 3212, dismissing plaintiff's complaint against defendant<br />
Patterson-Kelley Division with prejudice, and there being no opposition thereto,<br />
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against<br />
defendant Patterson-Kelley Division, be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and<br />
without costs.<br />
BY<br />
WEITZ & LUXENBERG, P.C.<br />
Attorneys for Plaintiff<br />
1 SO Maiden Lane<br />
New York, NY 10038<br />
Benjamin R. Dwyer Esq.<br />
NIXON PEABODY LLP<br />
Attorneys for Defendant,<br />
Patterson-Kelley<br />
Key Towers at Fount<br />
40 Fountain<br />
Buffalo, NY 14202<br />
(716) 853-8100<br />
APR 2 6 ""<br />
D<br />
Hon. Sherry Klein Heitler<br />
13381246 1<br />
APR 15 20<strong>11</strong>
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK<br />
ALL COUNTIES WITHIN NEW YORK CITY<br />
NYCAL<br />
I.A.S. Part 30<br />
(Judge Heitler)<br />
Index No.: 100592/00<br />
- against -<br />
A.C. & S., Inc., et al.,<br />
Plaintiffs,<br />
NO OPPOSITION<br />
SUMMARY JUDGMENT<br />
MOTION AND ORDER<br />
Defendants.<br />
______________________<br />
- -X<br />
WHEREFORE, defendant Mario & DiBono Plastering Co. Inc.<br />
hereby requests summary judgment in the above-entitled case<br />
pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section §3212<br />
dismissing plaintiffs' Complaint against defendant Mario<br />
DiBono Plastering Co. Inc., with prejudice, and there being n<br />
opposition thereto,<br />
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claim<br />
and cross claims against defendant Mario & DiBono Plastering Co<br />
Inc., be dismissed with prejudice and without costs.<br />
Dated: 6 Et<br />
2 6 20<strong>11</strong><br />
Weitz & Luxenberg, P.C.<br />
Attorneys for Plaintiffs<br />
William T. Franklin and Anne L. Mario & DiBono Plastering Co.<br />
Frank1 in<br />
Inc.<br />
700 Broadway, 6th Floor 177 Montague Street<br />
New York, New York 10003 Brooklyn, New York <strong>11</strong>201<br />
8) 855-9000<br />
File No.: 10924-6462<br />
So Ordered:<br />
APR 15 20<strong>11</strong>
-------f-----l_____l-----------------<br />
L<br />
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK<br />
ALL COUNTIES WITHIN NEW YORK CITY<br />
-X<br />
IN RE: NEW YORK COUNTY<br />
ASBESTOS LITIGATION<br />
..................................... -X<br />
This Document Relates to:<br />
Charles A. Vitale, as Executor for the<br />
Estate of Wesley A. Schwartz,<br />
NY CAL<br />
I.A.S. Part 30<br />
(Judge Heitler)<br />
Index No.: 101760/00<br />
- against -<br />
A.C. & S. Inc. , et al. ,<br />
Plaintiff,<br />
NO OPPOSITION<br />
SUMMARY JUDGMENT<br />
MOTION AND ORDER<br />
WHEREFORE, defendant Mario &<br />
DiBono Plastering Co. Inc.,<br />
hereby requests summary judgment in the above-entitled case,<br />
pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section §3212,<br />
dismissing plaintiffs' Complaint against defendant Mario 6<br />
DiBono Plastering Co. Inc., with prejudice, and there being nc<br />
opposition thereto,<br />
ORDERED, that upon notice- to all co-defendants, all claim:<br />
and cross claims against defendant Mario & DiBono Plastering Co.<br />
Inc., be dismissed with prejudice and without costs<br />
Dated:<br />
Brooklyn, New York<br />
q(rr 20<strong>11</strong><br />
Weitz & Luxenberg, P.C.<br />
Attorneys for Plaintiff<br />
Charles A. Vitale, as Executor Mario & DiBono Plastering Co.<br />
for the Estate of Wesley A. Inc.<br />
Schwa rt z<br />
177 Montague Street<br />
700 Broadway, 6th Floor Brooklyn, New York <strong>11</strong>201<br />
New York, New York 1000 18) 855-9000<br />
r File No.: 10924-6458<br />
So Ordered:
-."--I^<br />
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK<br />
ALL COUNTIES WITHIN NEW YORK CITY<br />
_l_--_l____---------Ilf___________l___<br />
X NYCAL<br />
IN RE: NEW YORK COUNTY I.A.S. Part 30<br />
ASBESTOS LITIGATION<br />
(Judge Heitler)<br />
X<br />
This Document Relates to:<br />
Index No.: 102783/00<br />
THOMAS J. CRUGER, SR.<br />
NO-OPPOSITION<br />
SUMMARY JUDWNT<br />
Plaintiff,<br />
MOTION AND ORDER<br />
A.C. &<br />
- against -<br />
S., INC., et al.,<br />
Defendants.<br />
X<br />
I<br />
WHEREFORE, defendant BURNHAM LLC, hereby requests summary<br />
judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law<br />
and Rules Section §3212, dismissing plaintiffs' Complaint against<br />
defendant BURNHAM LLC, with prejudice, and there being no<br />
opposition thereto,<br />
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and<br />
cross claims against defendant BURNHAM LLC,<br />
prejudice and without costs.<br />
2 6 20<strong>11</strong><br />
FIE'<br />
Weitz 6r Luxenberg,<br />
Attorneys for Plaintiff Attorneys for Defendant<br />
Thomas J, Cxuger, Sr.<br />
Burn ham 1;LC<br />
700 Broadway, 6'h Floor 177 Montague Street<br />
New York, New York 10003 Brooklyn, New York <strong>11</strong>201<br />
212-558-5500 (718) 855-9000<br />
Our File No.: <strong>11</strong>084-2176<br />
SO ORDERED:<br />
Hon. Sherry K. Heitler
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK<br />
ALL COUNTIES WITHIN NEW YORK CITY<br />
...................................... X NYCAL<br />
IN RE: NEW YORK COUNTY I.A.S. Part 30<br />
ASBESTOS LITIGATION<br />
(Judge Heitler)<br />
-__llll______________--------------------<br />
X<br />
This Document Relates to: Index No.: 1<strong>04</strong>471/00<br />
DUANE BROUGHTON<br />
NO-OPPOSITION<br />
SUMMARY JUDGMENT<br />
Plaintiff,<br />
MOTION AND ORDER<br />
- against -<br />
A.C. & S., INC., et al.,<br />
WHEREFORE, defendant BURNHAM LLC, hereby requests summarj7<br />
judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law<br />
and Rules Section 53212, dismissing plaintiffs' Complaint against:<br />
defendant BURNHAM LLC, with prejudice, and there being no<br />
opposition thereto,<br />
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and<br />
cross claims against defendant BURNHAM LLC, be dismissed with<br />
prejudice and without costs.
______f-llll---lll--l-----l-ll---------------<br />
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK<br />
ALL COUNTIES WITHIN NEW YORK CITY<br />
X<br />
IN RE: NEW YORK COUNTY<br />
ASBESTOS LITIGATION<br />
X<br />
-_-____________________________-_--_--<br />
This Document Relates to:<br />
CARLO BRISCOLI<br />
Plaintiff,<br />
NYCAL<br />
I.A.S. Part 30<br />
(Judge Heitler)<br />
Index No.: 1<strong>04</strong>483/00<br />
NO-OPPOSITION<br />
SUMMARY JUDGMENT<br />
MOTION AND ORDER<br />
- against -<br />
A.C. & S., INC., et al.,<br />
WHEREFORE, defendant BURNHAM LLC,<br />
hereby requests summar<br />
judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice La<br />
and Rules Section 53212, dismissing plaintiffs' Complaint agains<br />
defendant BURNHAM LLC, with prejudice, and<br />
there being n<br />
opposition thereto,<br />
ORDERED, that upon notice ta all co-defendants, all claims an<br />
cross claims against defendant BURNHAM LLC, be dismissed wit<br />
prejudice and without costs.<br />
Dated: Broqkbyn, New York<br />
J<br />
Frank Ortiz, Es<br />
Weitz & Luxenbe<br />
Attorneys for P<br />
Carlo Bri scol i<br />
700 Broadway, 6th Floor<br />
New York, New York 10003<br />
212-558-5500<br />
Cullen and Dykman LLP<br />
Attorneys for Defendant<br />
Bu xn ham L LC<br />
177 Montague Street<br />
Brooklyn, New YorkrA,l$2Q1<br />
(718) 855-9000 kd<br />
Our File No.: <strong>11</strong>084-2327<br />
SO ORDERED:<br />
_e_-- "<br />
Hon. Sherry I?: Heitler
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK<br />
ALL COUNTIES WITHIN NEW YORK CITY<br />
IN RE:<br />
NEW YORK COUNTY<br />
ASBESTOS LITIGATION<br />
This Document Relates to:<br />
Rosemary Schiano, Individually and as<br />
Executrix for the Estate of Daniel<br />
Schiano,<br />
Plaintiff,<br />
- against -<br />
A.C. &i S., Inc., et al.,<br />
NYCAL<br />
I.A.S. Part 30<br />
(Judge Heitler)<br />
Index No.: 105249/00<br />
NO OPPOSITION<br />
SUMMARY JUDGMENT<br />
MOTION AND ORDER<br />
Defendants.<br />
______-----________------------------<br />
-X<br />
WHEREFORE, defendant Mario & DiBono Plastering Co. Inc.<br />
hereby requests summary judgment in the above-entitled case<br />
pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section §3212<br />
dismissing plaintiffs' Complaint against defendant Mario 1<br />
DiBono Plastering Co. Inc., with prejudice, and there being nc<br />
opposition thereto,<br />
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claimt<br />
and cross claims against defendant Mario & DiBono Plastering Co<br />
Inc., be dismissed with prejudice and without c0sts.F 1 1<br />
APR 2 6 201'1<br />
Qdniel P. hlouin, Esq.<br />
Weitz & Luxenberg, P.C.<br />
Cuwen and Dykrnan LLP<br />
Attorneys for Plaintiff<br />
Attorneys for Defendant<br />
Rosemary Schiano, Individually Mario & DiBono Plastering Co.<br />
and as Executrix for the Estate Inc.<br />
of Daniel Schiano<br />
177 Montague Street<br />
700 Broadway, 6th Floor Brooklyn, New York <strong>11</strong>201<br />
New York, New York 10003 18) 855-9000<br />
r File No.: 10924-6305<br />
So Ordered:<br />
AfR 15 28<strong>11</strong>
~ .<br />
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK<br />
ALL COUNTIES WITHIN NEW YORK CITY<br />
X NYCAL<br />
IN RE: NEW YORK COUNTY I.A.S. Part 30<br />
ASBESTOS LITIGATION<br />
(Judge Heitler)<br />
___ll--l---____-----____l______<br />
X<br />
This Document Relates to:<br />
RONALD R. KENT<br />
- against -<br />
Plaintiff,<br />
Index No.: 105342/00<br />
NO-OPPOSITION<br />
SUMMARY JUDGMENT<br />
MOTION AND ORDER<br />
A.C. &<br />
S., INC., et al.,<br />
Defendants.<br />
X<br />
WHEREFORE, defendant BURNHAM LLC, hereby requests summary<br />
judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law<br />
and Rules Section §3212, dismissing plaintiffs' Complaint against:<br />
defendant BURNHAM LLC, with prejudice, and there being no<br />
opposition thereto,<br />
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and<br />
cross claims against defendant BURNHAM LLC, be dismissed with<br />
prejudice and without costs.<br />
w.v%,f?.<br />
Frank Ortiz, Esq.<br />
\. '1<br />
Weitz & Luxenberg, P.C. x*.?<br />
Attorneys for Plaintiff<br />
Ronald R. Kent<br />
700 Broadway, 6th Floor<br />
New York, New York 10003<br />
212-558-5500<br />
Cullen and Dykman LLP<br />
Attorneys for Defendant<br />
Busnham LLC<br />
177 Montague Street<br />
Brooklyn, New York<br />
(718) 855-9000<br />
Our File No.: <strong>11</strong>084-1<br />
2 6 20''<br />
SO ORDERED:<br />
-<br />
Hon. Sherry K. Heitler
-<br />
IN RE NEW YORK CITY ASBESTOS LITIGATION,<br />
THIS DOCWmNT WLATES TO:<br />
ALVIN E. EHL .<br />
INDEX NO.<br />
105849/00<br />
ASSIGNED TO:<br />
HON. SHERRY KLEIN HEITLER<br />
NO OPPOSITION SUMMARY<br />
JUDGMENT MOTION AND<br />
ORDER<br />
WHEREFORE, defmdant Consolidated Edison Company of New York, Xnc.<br />
hereby requests immmary judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law<br />
and Rules Section 3212, dismissing plaintiff's complaint against defendant Consolidated Edison<br />
Company of New York, Inc. with prejudice, and #ere being no opposition thereto,<br />
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross-claims<br />
against defendant Consolidated Edisan Company of New York, Inc., be and the same are hereby<br />
- - - - I--_ - " - .. - - -<br />
dismissed with prejudice and without costs.<br />
)UT File No<br />
4316-00<br />
€80 Maiden Lane<br />
New York, NY 10038-4925<br />
SO ORDERED:<br />
Consolidakh'kdison Company of New<br />
York, Inc.<br />
4 Irving Place<br />
New York, NY 10003-3598<br />
FILED<br />
APR 2 6 20<strong>11</strong>
__________--f--l----------------------<br />
X<br />
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK<br />
ALL COUNTIES WITHIN NEW YORK CITY<br />
X NYCAL<br />
IN RE: NEW YQRK COUNTY I.A.S. Part 30<br />
ASBESTOS LITIGATION<br />
___ll----l---_-____-------------------<br />
X<br />
(Judge Heitler)<br />
This Document Relates to:<br />
EDWARD J. FERGUSON<br />
Index No.: 105774/00<br />
Plaintiff ,<br />
NO-OPPOSITION<br />
SUMMARY JUDGMENT<br />
MOTION AND ORDER<br />
- against -<br />
A.C. &<br />
S., INC., et al.,<br />
Defendants.<br />
WHEREFORE, defendant BURNHAM LLC, hereby requests summar!,<br />
judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Lai!<br />
and Rules Section 53212, dismissing plaintiffs' Complaint against:<br />
defendant BURNHAM LLC, with prejudice, and there being nc<br />
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims an<br />
cross claims against defendant BURNHAM LLC, be dismissed wit<br />
prejudice and without costs.<br />
n, New York<br />
Weitz & Luxenberg<br />
Attorneys for Plaintiff Attorneys for Defendant<br />
Edward J. FeKguSOn<br />
Bum h am L L C<br />
700 Broadway, 6t'' Floor 177 Montague Street<br />
New York, New York 10003 Brooklyn, New Yorj jlEIE<br />
212-558-5500 (718) 855-9000<br />
Our File No.: <strong>11</strong> 84-2 4<br />
SO ORDERED:<br />
Hon. Sherry KFHeitler
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK<br />
COUNTY OF NEW YORK<br />
PHYLLIS GACH, Individually and as Proposed<br />
Executrix for the Estate of MICHAEL GACH,<br />
A.C. & S., INC., et al.,<br />
Plaintiff( s),<br />
-against-<br />
Defendants.<br />
: I.A.S. Part 30<br />
' (Hon. Sherry Klein Heitler)<br />
: Index No(s).$237iOZj<br />
05977-00.<br />
121985-99<br />
NO-OPPOSITION SUMMARY<br />
' JUDGMENT MOTION AND<br />
: ORDER<br />
WHEREFORE, defendant CRANE CO. hereby requests summary judgment in the<br />
above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 32 12, dismissing<br />
plaintiffs complaint against defendant CRANE CO. with prejudice, and there being no<br />
opposition thereto,<br />
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against<br />
defendant CRANE CO. be, and the same are hereby, dismissed with prejudice and without costs.<br />
Dated: 3 \30\ I\<br />
Neuork, New York<br />
WEITZ & LUXENBERG, P.C.<br />
Attorneys for Plaintiff(s)<br />
700 Broadway<br />
New York, NY 10003<br />
(2 12) 558-5500<br />
CRANE CO.<br />
599 Lexington Aven<br />
New York, NY 10022
I ’<br />
~<br />
__________---------__I________________<br />
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK<br />
ALL COUNTIES WITHIN NEW YORK CITY<br />
-_-_-_-----________-------------------<br />
X NYCAL<br />
IN RE: NEW YORK COUNTY I.A.S. Part 30<br />
ASBESTOS LITIGATION<br />
(Judge Heitler)<br />
X<br />
This Document Relates to:<br />
RONALD W. KLOPFER<br />
Index No.: 106483/00<br />
NO-OPPOSITION<br />
SUMMARY JUDGbENT<br />
Plaintiff,<br />
MOTION AND ORDER<br />
- against -<br />
I<br />
A.C. & S., INC., et al.,<br />
Defendants.<br />
-_______-__________-------------------<br />
WHEREFOREf defendant BURNHAM LLC, hereby requests summary<br />
X<br />
I<br />
I<br />
judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law<br />
and Rules Section 53212, dismissing plaintiffs’ Complaint against:<br />
defendant BURNHAM LLC, with prejudice, and there being no<br />
opposition thereto,<br />
ORDERED,<br />
that upon notice to a<strong>11</strong> co-defendants, all claims and<br />
cross claims against defendant BURNHAM LLC, be dismissed with<br />
rk<br />
<strong>11</strong><br />
T<br />
Frank Ortiz, Esq.<br />
Weitz & Luxenberg, P.C.<br />
Attorneys for Plaintiff<br />
Ronald W. Klopfer<br />
700 Broadway, 6th Floor<br />
New York, New York 10003<br />
212-558-5500<br />
Cullen and Dykman LLP<br />
Attorneys for Defendant<br />
Burnham LLC<br />
177 Montague Street<br />
Brooklyn, New York <strong>11</strong>201<br />
(718) 855-9000<br />
Our File No. :<br />
APR 2 6 20<strong>11</strong>
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK<br />
ALL COUNTIES WITHIN NEW YORK CITY<br />
..................................... -X<br />
IN RE: NEW YORK COUNTY<br />
ASBESTOS LITIGATION<br />
..................................... -X<br />
This Document Relates to:<br />
Barbara J. Klopfer, Individually and as<br />
Executrix for the Estate of Ronald W.<br />
Klopf er ,<br />
Plaintiff,<br />
- against -<br />
A.C. & S., Inc., et al.,<br />
NYCAL<br />
I.A.S. Part 30<br />
(Judge Heitler)<br />
Index No.: 106483/00<br />
NO OPPOSITION<br />
SUMMARY JUDGMENT<br />
MOTION 2WD ORDER<br />
WHEREFORE, defendant Mario &<br />
DiBono Plastering Co. Inc.<br />
hereby requests summary judgment in the above-entitled case<br />
pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section §3212<br />
dismissing plaintiffs' Complaint against defendant Mario<br />
DiBono Plastering Co. Inc., with prejudice, and there being n<br />
opposition thereto,<br />
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claim<br />
and cross claims against defendant Mario & DiBon<br />
Inc., be dismissed with prejudice and without co<br />
Dated:<br />
Brooklyn, New York<br />
, 20<strong>11</strong><br />
Weitz & Luxenberg, P.C.<br />
Attorneys for Plaintiff<br />
Barbara J. Klopfer,<br />
Mario & DiBono Plastering Co.<br />
Individually and as Executrix Inc.<br />
for the Estate of Ronald W. 177 Montague Street<br />
K1 opf er Brooklyn, New York <strong>11</strong>201<br />
700 Broadway, 6th Floor<br />
New York, New York 10003 NO. : 10924-6464<br />
So Ordered:
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK<br />
COlJNTY OF NEW YON<br />
IN RE: NEW YORK COUNTY<br />
! NYCAL<br />
ASBESTOS LITIGATION<br />
i I.A.S. Part 30<br />
(Heitler, J.)<br />
THIS DOCUMENT REFERS TO:<br />
f Index No.: 107449/00<br />
ANTONIO MIGLXOZI AND MARIA M.<br />
MIGLIOZI,<br />
; NO OPPOSITION<br />
Plaintiffs, i SUMMARY JUDGMENT<br />
-againstj<br />
MOTION AND ORDER<br />
~.---<br />
A. C. & $., INC., et al.,<br />
Defendants.<br />
j<br />
WHEREFORE, defendant, Oakfabco, Inc., hereby requests summary judgment in the<br />
above entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules 5 3212, dismissing plaintiffs’<br />
complaint against defendant, Oakfabco, Inc., with prejudice in this action, and there being no<br />
opposition thereto,<br />
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against<br />
defendant, Oakfabco, Tnc., be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and without<br />
costs.<br />
Dated: New York, New York<br />
Robert Darish, Esq.<br />
Attorney for Defendant<br />
Oakfabco, Inc.<br />
MCGIVNEY & KLUGER, P.C.<br />
80 Broad Street-Suite 2300<br />
New York, New York 100<strong>04</strong><br />
(212) 509-3456<br />
Antonio Migliozzi and Maria M.<br />
WElTZ & LWXENBERG, P.C.<br />
700 Broadway<br />
N0<strong>04</strong><strong>04</strong>74-1
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK<br />
COUNTY OF NEW YORK<br />
IN RE: NEW YORK CITY ASBESTOS LITIGATION<br />
ANTONIO MIGLIOZZT and MARIA M.<br />
MIGLIOZZI,<br />
NYCAL<br />
1 I.A.S. Part 30<br />
: (Hon. Sherry Klein Heitler)<br />
Plaintiff( s),<br />
: Index No(s).: 107449-00<br />
A.C. & S., INC., et al,,<br />
-against-<br />
: NO-OPPOSITION SUMMARY<br />
: JUDGMENT MOTION AND<br />
1 ORDER<br />
WHEREFORE, defendant CRANE CO. hereby requests summary judgment in the<br />
above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 32 12, dismissing<br />
plaintiffs' complaint against defendant CRANE CO. with prejudice, and there being no<br />
opposition thereto,<br />
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against<br />
defendant CRANE CO. be, and the same are hereby, dismissed with prejudice and without costs.<br />
Dated: 3 \3 o\ \\<br />
New<br />
ork, New York<br />
FILED<br />
Th<br />
Kirste K&L ATESLLP Alford Kneis, Esq. APR MEW 2 YORK 6 20<strong>11</strong><br />
yWEITZ Frank Ortiz, & LUXENBERG,<br />
Esq.<br />
Attorneys for Plaintiff(s)<br />
Atto eys for DefendmUNfY CLERKS OFFICE<br />
700 Broadway CRANE CO.<br />
New York, NY 10003<br />
599 Lexington Avenue<br />
(212) 558-5500<br />
New York, NY 10022<br />
(212) 536-3900<br />
SO ORDERED,
-<br />
I<br />
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK<br />
COUNTY OF NEW YORK I<br />
IN RE: NEW YON COUNTY<br />
NYCAL<br />
ASBESTOS LITIGATION<br />
I.A.S. Part 30<br />
(Heitler, J.)<br />
/<br />
THIS DOCUMENT REFERS TO:<br />
ANTONIO MIGLIOZI AND MARIA M.<br />
MIGLIOZI,<br />
-against-<br />
A. C. & S., INC., et al.,<br />
Plaintiffs,<br />
Index No.: I07449/00<br />
NO OPPOSITION<br />
SUMMARY JUDGMENT<br />
MOTION AND O E R<br />
Defendants.<br />
i<br />
WHEREFORE, defendant, Treadwell Corporation, hereby requests summary judgment in<br />
the above entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules 0 3212, dismissing plaintiffs'<br />
complaint against defendant, Treadwell Corporation, with prejudice in this action, and there<br />
being no opposition thereto,<br />
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against<br />
defendant, Treadwell Corporation, be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and<br />
without costs.<br />
Dated: New York, New York<br />
).I<br />
Attorney for Defendant<br />
Treadwell Corporation<br />
MCGIVNEY & ~LUGER, P.C.<br />
WEITZ & LUXENBERG, P.C.<br />
80 Broad Street-Suite 2300<br />
700 Broadway<br />
New York, New York 100<strong>04</strong><br />
New York, New York<br />
APR 2 6 2t)"<br />
10003<br />
(212) 509-3456 (212) 558-5500<br />
h1C-W YORK<br />
SO ORDERED,<br />
couNTy CLERKS OFF"'<br />
Hon. SKdy Klein Heitler 1235-1 4382<br />
NOQ4<strong>04</strong>78-1<br />
APR 15'20<strong>11</strong>
This Document Relates To:<br />
PATRICIA PALADINO, as Administratrix for the<br />
Estate of WILLIAM PHILIP ALLOCA,<br />
A.C. & S., INC., et al.,<br />
Plaintiff(s),<br />
-against-<br />
Defendants.<br />
NYCAL<br />
I.A.S. Part 30<br />
(Hon, Sherry Klein Heitler)<br />
Index No(s).: 108356-00<br />
NO-OPPOSITION SUMMARY<br />
JUDGMENT MOTION AND<br />
ORDER<br />
WHEREFORE, defendant CRANE CO. hereby requests summary judgment in the<br />
above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 32 12, dismissing<br />
plaintiffs complaint against defendant CRANE CO. with prejudice, and there being no<br />
opposition thereto,<br />
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against<br />
defendant CRANE CO. be, and the same are hereby, dismissed with prejudice and without costs.<br />
Dated: 3 \>e\ I\<br />
New York, New York<br />
n<br />
Frank Ortiz, Esq. \<br />
WEITZ & LUXENBERG, P.C.<br />
Attorneys for Plaintiff(s)<br />
700 Broadway<br />
New York, NY 10003<br />
><br />
Kirsteq/Alford Kneis, Esq.<br />
F! D<br />
CRANE CO.<br />
599 Lexington Avenue<br />
(212) 558-5500 NewYork,NY 10022 APR 2 6 20''<br />
(212) 536-3900<br />
p ::*rgj YORK<br />
SO ORDERED, (-w i \ CLERKS OFFICE<br />
%<br />
Hon. Sherry Klely Heitler<br />
APR 15 20<strong>11</strong>
SUPREME COURT OF THE STA'TEQF NEW YORK<br />
COUNTY OF NEW YORK<br />
IN RE: NEW YOKK COUNTY<br />
! NYCAL<br />
ASBESTOS LITIGATION<br />
i 1.A.S. Part 30<br />
i (Heitler, J.)<br />
-i- 1-1 I s u oc u M EEREFEKS<br />
TO :<br />
0<br />
j lndex No.: 1 15836/00, 08386/00<br />
i<br />
MARY ICOMANO, INDIVIDUALLY AND AS<br />
EXECUTRIX FOR TIHE ESTATE OF GIN0<br />
KOMANO, \ NO OPPOSITION<br />
-against-<br />
A. C. & S., INC., et d.,<br />
Plaintiffs,<br />
i<br />
SUMMARY JUDGMENT<br />
i MOTION AND ORDER<br />
Defendants.<br />
J<br />
WHEREFORE, defendant, Treadwell Corporation, hereby requests summary judgment in<br />
the above entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules 5 3212, dismissing plaintiffs'<br />
complaint against defendant, Treadwell Corporation, with prejudice in this action, and there<br />
being 'no opposition thereto,<br />
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims agains#<br />
defendant, Treadwell Corporation, be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and<br />
without costs.<br />
Attorney for Defendant<br />
Treadwell Corporation<br />
MCGIVNEY & KLUGER, P.C.<br />
SO Broad Street-Suite 2300<br />
New York, New York 100<strong>04</strong><br />
(212) 509-3456<br />
700 Broadway<br />
Hon. Sherry Klein Heitler<br />
NO<strong>04</strong><strong>04</strong>78- 1
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK<br />
COUNTY OF NEW YORK<br />
1N RE: NEW YORK COUNTY<br />
j NYCAL<br />
ASBESTOS LlTIGATlON<br />
: I.A.S. Part 30<br />
(H ei t 1 er , J .)<br />
THlS DOCUMENT REFERS TO:<br />
Index No.: <strong>11</strong>5836/00,<br />
MARY ROMANO, INDIVIDUALLY AND AS<br />
EXECUTRTX FOR THE ESTATE OF GIN0<br />
ROMANO,<br />
NO OPPOSITION<br />
SUMMARY JUDGMENT<br />
Plaintiffs, MOTION AND ORDER<br />
-against-<br />
A. C. & S., INC., etal.,<br />
Defendants.<br />
WHEREFORE, defendant, Safeguard Industrial Equipment Go., hereby requests<br />
summary judgment in the above entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules 6 3212,<br />
dismissing plaintiffs' complaint against defendant, Safeguard Industrial Equipment Co., with<br />
prejudice in this action, and there being no opposition thereto,<br />
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against<br />
defendant, Safeguard Industrial Equipment Co., be and the same are hereby dismissed with<br />
prejudice and without costs.<br />
Dated: New York, New Yoxk -<br />
Matthe!& bc Shrnpar, Esq.<br />
Attorney fo>E&fendant Attorney for Plaintiffs f<br />
Safeguard Industrial Equipment CO.<br />
Estate of Gin0 Romano<br />
I P.0<br />
MCGIVNEY & KLUGER, P.C.<br />
WEITZ & LUXENBERG, P.C.<br />
80 Broad Street-Suite 2300<br />
700 Broadway<br />
New York, New York 100<strong>04</strong><br />
New York, New York 10003 A?fi 2 6 Zoll<br />
*-+%*_ (212)<br />
~ 558-5500<br />
(212) 509-3456 CTA,/,//-<br />
SO ORDERED,<br />
I<br />
Hon. S h h Klein 1 Ieitler<br />
324-5095C<br />
N0<strong>04</strong><strong>04</strong>78-1
NYCAL<br />
I.A.S. Part 30<br />
Hon. Sherry Klein Heitler, J.S.C.<br />
FRANK 1. CAMARDELLA,<br />
Index No.: 108846-2000<br />
-against-<br />
AX. &S. INC., et al. including,<br />
FOSTER WHEELER CORPORATION,<br />
Plaintiff,<br />
NO OPPOSITION SUMMARY JUDGMENT<br />
MOTION AND ORDER<br />
Defendants.<br />
WHEREFORE, defendant FOSTER WHEELER, L.L.C. (sued herein as "FOSTER WHEELER<br />
CORPORATION") hereby request summary judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil<br />
Practice Law and Rules Section 3212, dismissing plaintiffs' complaint against defendant FOSTER<br />
WHEELER, L.L.C. with prejudice, and there being no opposition thereto,<br />
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against defendant<br />
FOSTER WHEELER, L.L.C. be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and without costs.<br />
Frank Ortiz, Esq.<br />
Weitt & Luxenberg, P.C.<br />
Attorney for Plain tvfs<br />
700 Broadway<br />
New York, New York 10003<br />
Attorneys for Foster Wheeler, L. L.C.<br />
Three Gateway Center, 12fh Floor<br />
Newark, NJ 07102<br />
SO ORDERED,<br />
clou@<br />
NJ/341734vl
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK<br />
COUNTY OF NEW YORK<br />
CAROL NICOLAIDIS, as Administratrix for the : NYCAL<br />
Estate of JAMES NICOLAIDIS, and CAROL : I.A.S. Part 30<br />
NICOLAIDIS, Individually,<br />
: (Hon. Sherry Klein Heitler)<br />
A.C. & S., INC,, et al.,<br />
Plaintiff(s),<br />
-against-<br />
: Index No. 109064-00<br />
NO-OPPOSITION SUMMARY<br />
: JUDGMENT MOTION AND<br />
: ORDER<br />
WHEREFORE, defendant CRANE CO. hereby requests summary judgment in the<br />
above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212, dismissing<br />
plaintiffs' complaint against defendant CRANE CO. with prejudice, and there being no<br />
opposition thereto,<br />
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against<br />
defendant CRANE CO. be, and the same are hereby, dismissed with prejudice and without costs.<br />
Dated: -3 \3 e\ \\<br />
w<br />
New York. New York<br />
n'<br />
Frank Ortiz. Esa.<br />
WEITZ & LUXENBERG-?<br />
Attorneys for Plaintiff(s)<br />
Kirstepf Alford Kneis, Esq.<br />
700 Broadway CRANE CO.<br />
New York, NY 10003<br />
(212) 558-5500<br />
599 Lexington Avenue<br />
New York, NY 10022<br />
+ . (212) 536-3900<br />
YORK<br />
CLERK'S OFF'='<br />
SO ORDERED,<br />
Hon, Sherry Klein Heitler<br />
APR 15 ?Ojf
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK<br />
COUNTY OF NEW YORK<br />
_____________"_r__l_r___________________----------------"-"------<br />
IN RE: NEW YORK CITY ASBESTOS LITIGATION<br />
_____________<strong>11</strong>_1_1____ll__l_l_lll___lr_-------------------------<br />
X<br />
This Document Relates To:<br />
RUTH MCDADE, as Executrix for the Estate of : NYCAL<br />
CORNELIUS FRANCIS MCDADE, and RUTH : I.A.S, Part 30<br />
MCDADE, Individually,<br />
: (Hon. Sherry Klein Heitler)<br />
X<br />
A.C. & S., INC., et al.,<br />
Plaintiff(s),<br />
-against-<br />
: Index No(s).: 109413-00<br />
NO-OPPOSITION SUMMARY<br />
: JUDGMENT MOTION AND<br />
: ORDER<br />
WHEREFORE, defendant CRANE CO. hereby requests summary judgment in the<br />
above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 32 12, dismissing<br />
plaintiffs complaint against defendant CRANE CO. with prejudice, and there being no<br />
opposition thereto,<br />
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against<br />
defendant CRANE CO. be, and the same are hereby, dismissed with prejudice and without costs.<br />
Dated: 3 \,3 O\ \\-<br />
New Yxk, New York<br />
Attorneys for Plaintiff(s)<br />
700 Broadway<br />
New York, NY 10003<br />
Atdrneys for Defendant<br />
CRANE CO.<br />
NEW YORK<br />
599 Lexington Avenue SOUNTY CERK'S OFFEE<br />
Hon. Sherry Klein Heitler<br />
APR 15 20<strong>11</strong>
_I_l____llf_-_-____flll-----------------<br />
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK<br />
ALL COUNTIES WITHIN NEW YORK CITY<br />
-X<br />
IN RE: NEW YORK COUNTY<br />
ASBESTOS LITIGATION<br />
_________________II_II___________<br />
-X<br />
This Document Relates to:<br />
Judith L. Mathis, Individually and as<br />
Executrix for the Estate of John L.<br />
Mathis,<br />
Plaintiff,<br />
- against -<br />
A.C. & S., Inc., et al.,<br />
Defendants.<br />
NYCAL<br />
I.A.S. Part 30<br />
(Judge Heitler)<br />
Index No.: 109431/00<br />
NO OPPOSITION<br />
SUMMARY JUDGMENT<br />
MOTION AND ORDER<br />
WHEREFORE, defendant Mario &<br />
DiBono Plastering Co. Inc.<br />
hereby requests summary judgment in the above-entitled case<br />
pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 53212<br />
dismissing plaintiffs' Complaint against defendant Mario<br />
DiBono Plastering Co. Inc., with prejudice, and there being n<br />
opposition thereto,<br />
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claim<br />
and cross claims against defendant Mario & DiBono Plastering Co<br />
Inc., be dismissed with prejudice and without cost<br />
$I<br />
Dated: Brooklyn, New York<br />
4lr-L , 20<strong>11</strong><br />
\\<br />
PR 2 6 20<strong>11</strong><br />
Michael Fanklli, Esq.<br />
Weitz & Luxenberg, P.C.<br />
CLERKS OFF<br />
Attorneys for Plaintiff<br />
dtorneys for Defendant<br />
Judith L. Mathis, Individually Mario & DiBono Plastering Co.<br />
and as Executrix for the Estate Inc.<br />
of John L. Mathis<br />
177 Montague Street<br />
700 Broadway, 6th Floor Brooklyn, New York <strong>11</strong>201<br />
New York, New York 10003 18) 855-9000<br />
r File No.: 10924-6467<br />
So Ordered: AVR 15 20<strong>11</strong><br />
F
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK<br />
ALL COUNTIES WITHIN NEW YORK CITY<br />
...................................... X NYCAL<br />
IN RE: NEW YORK COUNTY I.A.S. Part 30<br />
ASBESTOS LITIGATION<br />
(Judge Heitler)<br />
--_-__---_---------------------------- X<br />
This Document Relates to: Index No. : 109491/00<br />
GEORGE P. MCGOFF<br />
NO-OPPOSITION<br />
- against -<br />
A.C. & S., INC., et al.,<br />
Plaintiff,<br />
Defendants.<br />
-----__-lf--l_________________________<br />
X<br />
SUMMARY JUDGMENT<br />
MOTION AND ORDER<br />
WHEREFORE, defendant BURNHAM LLC, hereby requests summary<br />
judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law<br />
and Rules Section 53212, dismissing plaintiffs' Complaint agains-:<br />
defendant<br />
BURNHAM LLC, with prejudice, and there being no<br />
opposition thereto,<br />
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and<br />
cross claims against defendant BURNHAM LLC, be dismissed with<br />
prejudice and without costs.<br />
Weitz & Luxenberg, P.C.<br />
Attorneys for Plaintiff Attorneys for Defendant<br />
George P. McGoff<br />
Burnham LLC<br />
700 Broadway, 6th Floor 177 Montague Street<br />
SUPREME COURT OF THE S'I'ATE OF NEW YORK<br />
COUNTY OF NEW YOKK<br />
IN RE: NEW YORK COUNTY<br />
NYCAL<br />
ASBESTOS LlTIGATION<br />
I.A.S. Part 30<br />
(Heitler, J.)<br />
THIS DOCUMENT REFERS TO:<br />
Index No.: 1<br />
DOROTHY MELNYK, INDIVIDUALLY AND<br />
EXECUTRIX FOR THE ESTATE OF MICHAEL<br />
A. MELNYK,<br />
NO OPPOSlTION<br />
SUMMARY JUDGMENT<br />
Plaintiffs, i MOTION AND ORDER<br />
."-<br />
-against-<br />
A. C. & S., NC., et a/.,<br />
Defendants.<br />
j<br />
WHEREFORE, defendant, Treadwell Corporation, hereby requests summary judgment in<br />
the above entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules $ 3212, dismissing plaintiffs'<br />
complaint against defendant, Treadwell Corporation, with prejudice in this action, and there<br />
being no opposition thereto,<br />
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against<br />
defendant, Treadwell Corporation, be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and<br />
without costs.<br />
Dated: New York, New York<br />
W! ,20<strong>11</strong><br />
m Z . 7 4 -<br />
Carol M. Tempesta, Esq.<br />
Attorney for Defendant<br />
Treadwell Corporation<br />
Estate of Michael A. Melnyg<br />
MCGIVNEY & kUGER, P.C.<br />
WEITZ & LUXENBERG, P.C.<br />
80 Broad Street-Suite 2300<br />
700 Broadway<br />
&;I;<br />
New<br />
2 6 20<strong>11</strong><br />
New York, New York 100<strong>04</strong><br />
York, New York 10003<br />
(212) . , 509-3456 n., (212) 558-5500<br />
- 1 - ?' ,' i; 3 K<br />
SO ORDElZED,<br />
CQC;N-~ Y CLERK'S OFFICE]<br />
1235-13909<br />
N0<strong>04</strong><strong>04</strong>78-1<br />
APR 15 2Q<strong>11</strong>
--_--_-I<br />
SUPREME COT JKT OF THE Sl’ATE OF NEW YORK<br />
COUNTY OF NEW YORK<br />
IN re.: NEW Y ~ R K COUNTY<br />
I NYCAJ,<br />
ASBESTOS LI?‘IGATION j I.A.S. Part 30<br />
i (Heitler, J.)<br />
*IWS DEUMENT<br />
REFERS TO:<br />
RAYMOND J. SCHWARTZ AND DOROTHY A. i<br />
SCHWARTZ,<br />
j lndex No.: <strong>11</strong> 787310<br />
I<br />
A. C. & S., INC., et nl.,<br />
P 1 aint i ffs, i NO OPPOSITION<br />
i SUMMARY JUDGMENT<br />
-against- j MOTION AND ORDER<br />
-<br />
Defendants.<br />
j<br />
WHEREFORE, defendant, Treadwell Corporation, hereby requests summary judgment in<br />
the above entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules 9 3212, dismissing plaintiffs’<br />
’<br />
complaint against defendant, Treadwell Corporation, with prejudice in this action, and there<br />
being no opposition thereto,<br />
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against<br />
defendant, Treadwell Corporation, be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and ’<br />
without costs.<br />
Dated: New York, New York<br />
91 I p 201 1<br />
\<br />
Carol M. Tempesta, Esq.<br />
Attorney for Defendant<br />
Treadwell Corporation<br />
MCGIWEY & KLUGER, P.C.<br />
80 Broad Street-Suite 2300<br />
New York, New York 100<strong>04</strong><br />
WEITZ & LUXENBERG, P.C.<br />
700 Broadway<br />
New York, New York 1000<br />
(212) 509-3456 (212) 558-5500<br />
I *”-”.”- 2 6 20<strong>11</strong><br />
SO ORDERED, .<br />
c -<br />
Hon. Shew KleX Heitler 1 35-1$&$4 \(ORK<br />
co&!R CLEff K‘S OFFICE‘<br />
N0<strong>04</strong><strong>04</strong>78-1
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK<br />
COUNTY OF NEW YORK<br />
IN RE: NEW YORK COUNTY<br />
i NYCAL<br />
ASBESTOS LITIGATION<br />
i I.A.S. Part 30<br />
: (Heitler, J.)<br />
THIS DOCUMENT REFERS TO:<br />
FRIEDRICH SCHEUERMANN,<br />
Plaintiffs,<br />
! NO OPPOSITION<br />
-against-<br />
i SUMMARY JUDGMENT<br />
: MOTION AND ORDER<br />
A. C. & S., INC., el al.,<br />
Defendants. !<br />
WHEREFORE, defendant, Oakfabco, Inc., hereby requests summary judgment in the<br />
I<br />
!<br />
I<br />
above entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules $ 3212, dismissing plaintiffs’<br />
complaint against defendant, Oakfabco, Inc., with prejudice in this action, and there being no<br />
opposition thereto,<br />
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against<br />
defendant, Oakfabco, Inc., be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and without<br />
costs.<br />
Dated: New York, New York<br />
q/1 ,20<strong>11</strong><br />
-<br />
Robert Darish, Esq.<br />
Attorney for Defendant<br />
Oakfabco, Inc.<br />
Attorney for Plaintiffs<br />
Friedrich Scheuermann<br />
MCGIVNEY & KLUGER, P.C.<br />
Weitz & Luxenberg, P.C.<br />
80 Broad Street-Suite 2300<br />
700 Broadway<br />
New York, New York 100<strong>04</strong><br />
New York, New York 10003<br />
(212) 509-3456 ~1 (212) 558-5500<br />
FILED<br />
APR 2 6 20’<strong>11</strong><br />
I<br />
SO ORDERED,<br />
Hon. Sherry Klein Heitler -<br />
2571-0790AR<br />
N0038955-1
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK<br />
COUNTY OF NEW YO'RK<br />
IN RE: NEW YORK COUNTY<br />
i NYCAL<br />
ASBESTOS LITIGATZON<br />
i I.A.S. Part 30<br />
i (Heitler, I.)<br />
THIS DOCUMENT REFERS TO:<br />
Index No.: <strong>11</strong>7873/0<br />
RAYMOND J. SCHWARTZ AND DOROTHY A. i<br />
SCHWARTZ,<br />
-against-<br />
A. C. &S., INC., etal.,<br />
Plaintiffs,<br />
Defendants.<br />
i NO OPPOSITION<br />
SUMMARY JUDGMENT<br />
i MOTION AND ORDER<br />
i<br />
WHEREFORE, defendant, Safeguard Industrial Equipment Co., hereby requests<br />
summary judgment in the above entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules 0 3212,<br />
dismissing plaintiffs' complaint against defendant, Safeguard Industrial Equipment Co., with<br />
prejudice in this action, and there being no opposition thereto,<br />
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against<br />
prejudice and without costs,<br />
N0<strong>04</strong><strong>04</strong>78-1<br />
APR 15 20<strong>11</strong>
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK<br />
COUNTY OF NEW YORK<br />
Plaintiff(s),<br />
-against-<br />
A.C. & S., INC., et al.,<br />
Defendants.<br />
.................................................................<br />
X<br />
Index No(s).: <strong>11</strong>0564-00<br />
: NO-OPPOSITION SUMMARY<br />
JUDGMENT MOTION AND<br />
ORDER<br />
WHEREFORE, defendant CRANE CO. hereby requests summary judgment in the<br />
above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 32 12, dismissing<br />
plaintiffs complaint against defendant CRANE CO. with prejudice, and there being no<br />
opposition thereto,<br />
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against<br />
defendant CRANE CO. be, and the same are hereby, dismissed with prejudice and without costs.<br />
Dated: 3 \30\ \\<br />
Newxrk, New York<br />
WEITZ & LUXENBERG=?<br />
Attorneys for Plaintiff(s)<br />
700 Broadway<br />
New York, NY 10003<br />
(212) 558-5500<br />
SO ORDERED,<br />
FILED<br />
K&L~ATES LLP<br />
Attorneys for Defendan<br />
CRANE CO.<br />
599LexingtonAvenue APR 2 6 20<strong>11</strong><br />
New York, NY 10022<br />
NEW YORK<br />
COUNTY CLERK'S OFnGk
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK<br />
COUNTY OF NEW YORK<br />
' NYCAL<br />
BETTY KING, Individually and as Executrix for the :<br />
. I.A.S. Part 30<br />
Estate of RONALD E. KING,<br />
(Hon. Sherry Klein Heitler)<br />
Plaint iff( s),<br />
: Index No(s).: <strong>11</strong>0960-00<br />
WHEREFORE, defendant CRANE CO. hereby requests summary judgment in the<br />
above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212, dismissing<br />
plaintiffs complaint against defendant CRANE CO. with prejudice, and there being no<br />
opposition thereto,<br />
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against<br />
defendant CRANE CO. be, and the same are hereby, dismissed with prejudice and without costs.<br />
Attorneys for Plaintiff(s)<br />
700 Broadway CRANE CO.<br />
New York, NY 10003<br />
599 Lexington Avenue<br />
(212) 558-5500<br />
New York, NY 10022<br />
SO ORDERED,<br />
Hon. Sherry Klein Heitler
THIS DOCUMENT RELATES TO:<br />
BERNARD IAMMATEO<br />
~ 9 l I W O 6<br />
ASSIGNED TO:<br />
HON. SHERRY KLEIN HEITLER<br />
NO OPPOSITION STJMMARY<br />
JUDGMENT MOTION AND<br />
ORDER<br />
WHEREFORE, defendant consolidated Edison Company of New York, Inc.<br />
hereby requests summary judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law<br />
and Rules Section 3212, dismissing plaintiffs complaint against defendant Consolidated Edison<br />
Company of New Yo& Inc. with prejudice, and there being no opposition thereto,<br />
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross-cfaims<br />
against defendant Consolidated Edison Company of New York, Inc., be and the same are hereby<br />
- - - - - - - - - -<br />
dismissed with prejudice and without costs.<br />
,"i" York<br />
Dated: ne^^^<br />
:B amin Darche, Esq.<br />
WEITZ & LUXENBERG, P.C.<br />
Attorneys for Plaintiff<br />
700 Broadway<br />
New York, NY 100035<br />
York, Inc.<br />
4 Irving Place<br />
New York, NY 10003-3598<br />
ESQ.
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK<br />
COUNTY OF NEW YORK<br />
1N RE: NEW YORK CITY ASBESTOS LITIGATION<br />
_rl___r___-__-___-_______________r_____r-------------------------<br />
X<br />
This Document Relates To:<br />
EDWARD GUNTRIPP and KATHLEEN ANN<br />
GUNTRIPP,<br />
: NYCAL<br />
I.A.S. Part 30<br />
: (Hon. Sherry Klein Heitler)<br />
WHEREFORE, defendant CRANE CO. hereby requests summary judgment in the<br />
above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212, dismissing<br />
plaintiffs' complaint against defendant CRANE CO, with prejudice, and there being no<br />
opposition thereto,<br />
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against<br />
defendant CRANE CO. be, and the same are hereby, dismissed with prejudice and without costs,<br />
Dated: '3 \.3 o\ \\<br />
KirstedAlford Kneis, Esq.<br />
K&@ATES LLP<br />
Attorneys for Plaintiff(s)<br />
Attorneys for Defenda<br />
700 Broadway CRANE CO.<br />
New York, NY 10003<br />
599 Lexington Avenue APR 2 6 20<strong>11</strong><br />
(2 12) 558-5500<br />
New York, NY 10022<br />
(2 12) 536-3900 ~:EW YORK<br />
~QUN iy CLERK'S OFFICE<br />
I<br />
SO ORJIEREiD,<br />
Hon. Sherry Klein Heitler
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK<br />
COUNTY OF NEW YORK<br />
* NYCAL<br />
LAURA FRACCALVIERI, as Administratrix for the :<br />
Part 3o<br />
Estate of FRANK FRACCALVIERI,<br />
(Hon, Shew Klein Heitler)<br />
Plaintiff(s),<br />
: Index No(s).: 1 12444-00<br />
A.C. & S., INC., et al.,<br />
-against-<br />
NO-OPPOSITION SUMMARY<br />
JUDGMENT MOTION AND<br />
: ORDER<br />
WHEREFORE, defendant CRANE CO. hereby requests summary judgment in the<br />
above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 32 12, dismissing<br />
plaintiff's<br />
complaint against defendant CRANE CO, with prejudice, and there being no<br />
opposition thereto,<br />
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against<br />
defendant CRANE CO. be, and the same are hereby, dismissed with prejudice and without costs.<br />
Dated: 3 \ 3d\ {\<br />
New York. New York<br />
Attorneys for Plaintiff(s)<br />
700 Broadway<br />
Attdneys for Defendant<br />
CRANE CO. APH 2 6 201'<br />
New York, NY 10003<br />
599 Lexington Avenue<br />
(212) 558-5500 New York, NY 10022 PiEw YORK<br />
(212) 536-3900 mt4N CLERKS OFFICE<br />
SO ORDERED,
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK<br />
COUNTY OF NEW YORK<br />
PATRICK C. VANCHIERI AND MARGARET<br />
VANCHIERI,<br />
A.C. & S., INC., et al.,<br />
Plaintiff(s),<br />
"against-<br />
Defendants,<br />
NYCAL<br />
: I.A.S. Part 30<br />
(Hon. Sherry Kle-i Heitler)<br />
1 Index No. <strong>11</strong>3196-00<br />
NO-OPPOSITION SUMMARY<br />
: JUDGMENT MOTION AND<br />
ORDER<br />
WHEREFORE, defendant CRANE CO, hereby requests summary judgment in the<br />
above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 32 12, dismissing<br />
plaintiffs' complaint against defendant CRANE CO. with prejudice, and there being no<br />
opposition thereto,<br />
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against<br />
defendant CRANE CO, be, and the same are hereby, dismissed with prejudice and without costs.<br />
Dated: 3 \3 a\ (\<br />
New &rk, New York<br />
Attorneys for Plaintiff(s)<br />
700 Broadway<br />
CRANE CO.<br />
New York, NY 10003<br />
599 Lexington Avenue<br />
(212) 558-5500 New York, NY 10022<br />
SO ORDERED,<br />
Hon. Sherry Klein Heitler<br />
AFR 15 20<strong>11</strong>
WHEREFORE, defendant CRANE CO. hereby requests summary judgment in the<br />
above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212, dismissing<br />
plaintiffs' complaint against defendant CRANE CO. with prejudice, and there being no<br />
opposition thereto,<br />
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against<br />
defendant CRANE CO. be, and the same are hereby, dismissed with prejudice and without costs.<br />
Dated: 3\3 -\ \\<br />
Frank Ortiz, Esq.<br />
WEITZ & LUXENBERG, P.<br />
Attorneys for Plaintiff(s)<br />
700 Broadway<br />
New York, NY 10003<br />
(212) 558-5500<br />
%<br />
Kirst n Alford Kneis. Esa.<br />
CRANE CO.<br />
599LexingtonAvenue APR 2 6 20<strong>11</strong><br />
New York, NY 10022<br />
(2 12) 536-3900<br />
SO ORDERED,
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK<br />
COUNTY OF NEW YORK<br />
IN RE: NEW YORK CITY ASBESTOS LITIGATION<br />
* NYCAL<br />
MARY ANN PICINIC and SANDY PICINIC as Co- :<br />
Part 3o<br />
Executrices for the Estate of RAIMONDO PICINIC, :<br />
, (Hon. Sherry Klein Heitler)<br />
A.C. & S., INC., et al.,<br />
Plaint i ff( s) ,<br />
-against-<br />
Defendants.<br />
Index No.: <strong>11</strong>3778-00<br />
: NO-OPPOSITION SUMMARY<br />
JUDGMENT MOTION AND<br />
: ORDER<br />
WHEREFORE, defendant CRANE CO. hereby requests summary judgment in the<br />
above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212, dismissing<br />
plaintiffs' complaint against defendant CRANE CO. with prejudice, and there being no<br />
opposition thereto,<br />
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against<br />
defendant CRANE CO. be, and the same are hereby, dismissed with prejudice and without costs.<br />
Dated: 3 \ 3 o \ \ \,<br />
Frank Ortiz, Esq.<br />
fiLED<br />
Attorneys for Plaintiff(s)<br />
700 Broadway CRANE CO.<br />
New York, NY 10003<br />
(212) 558-5500<br />
599 Lexington Avenue<br />
NewYork,NY 10022 APR 2 6 20<strong>11</strong><br />
SO ORDERED, ~9~~<br />
r?ii:\)V YORK<br />
1 y CLERK'S OFFICE<br />
APR 1.5 20<strong>11</strong>
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK<br />
ALL COUNTIES WITHIN NEW YORK CITY<br />
___l_l____------l--l------------------<br />
X NYCAL<br />
IN RE: NEW YORK COUNTY I.A.S. Part 30<br />
ASBESTOS LITIGATION<br />
(Judge Heitler<br />
-______-_--_-______-------------------<br />
X<br />
This Document Relates to:<br />
Index No.: <strong>11</strong>4257/00<br />
MICHAEL ZOGBY<br />
NO-OPPOSITION<br />
SUMMARY JUDGMENT<br />
Plaintiff,<br />
MOTION AND ORDER<br />
- against -<br />
A.C. & S., INC., et al.,<br />
WHEREFORE, defendant BURNHAM LLC, hereby requests summa<br />
judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice L<br />
and Rules Section §3212, dismissing plaintiffs' Complaint again<br />
defendant BURNHAM LLC, with prejudice,<br />
and there being<br />
opposition thereto,<br />
ORDERED,<br />
that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims a<br />
cross claims against defendant BURNHAM LLC,<br />
be dismissed wi<br />
prejudice and without costs.<br />
T<br />
Frank Ortiz, Esq.<br />
Weitz & Luxenberg, P.C.<br />
Attorneys for Plaintiff<br />
Michael Zogby<br />
700 Broadway, 6'h Floor<br />
New York, New York 10003<br />
212-558-5500<br />
Cullen and-Dykman- LLP<br />
Attorneys for Defendant<br />
Burn ham L LC<br />
177 Montague Stree<br />
Brooklyn, New York<br />
(718) 855-9000<br />
Our File No. : <strong>11</strong>084&j3W8<strong>26</strong> 20<strong>11</strong><br />
NEW YORK<br />
COUNTY CLERK'S OFFIC<br />
APR 15 20<strong>11</strong>
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK<br />
ALL COUNTIES WITHIN NEW YORK CITY<br />
________________-_-_____II____________<br />
X<br />
IN RE: NEW YORK COUNTY<br />
ASBESTOS LITIGATION<br />
.....................................<br />
This Document Relates to:<br />
Toni Zogby, Individually and as<br />
Administratrix for the Estate of<br />
Michael Zogby,<br />
Plaintiff,<br />
- against -<br />
A.C. & S.,<br />
Inc., et al.,<br />
-X<br />
NY CAL<br />
I.A.S. Part 30<br />
(Judge Heitler)<br />
Index No.: <strong>11</strong>4257/00<br />
NO OPPOSITION<br />
SUMMARY JUDGMENT<br />
MOTION AND ORDER<br />
Defendants.<br />
..................................... -X<br />
WHEREFORE, defendant Mario & DiBono Plastering Co. Inc.,<br />
hereby requests summary judgment in the above-entitled case,<br />
pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 83212,<br />
dismissing plaintiffs' Complaint against defendant Mario t<br />
DiBono Plastering Co. Inc., with prejudice, and there being nc<br />
opposition thereto,<br />
ORDERED,<br />
that upon notice to all co-defendants, a<strong>11</strong> claim:<br />
and cross claims against defendant Mario & DiBono Plastering Co,<br />
Inc., be dismissed with prejudice and without costs<br />
Dated: Brooklyn, New York<br />
D<br />
Weitz & Luxenberg, P.C.<br />
Attorneys for Plaintiff<br />
Toni Zogby, Individually and as Mario & DiBono Plastering Co.<br />
Administratrix fox the Estate Inc.<br />
of Michael Zogby<br />
177 Montague Street<br />
700 Broadway, 6th Floor Brooklyn, New York <strong>11</strong>201<br />
New York, New York 10003 (718) 855-9000<br />
Our File No.: 10924-6461<br />
So Ordered:<br />
Hon. Sher'ry K. Heitler
TMc:CC(jpk)<br />
4/29/09 SUPREME COURT : ALL COUNTIES<br />
WITJ3lN THE CITY OF NEW YORK<br />
M RE NEW YORK CITY ASBESTOS LITIGATION,<br />
THIS DOCUMENT RELATES TO:<br />
WILLIAM ANTON STOCKHAUSEN<br />
INDEX NO.<br />
<strong>11</strong>4791/00<br />
ASSIGNED TO:<br />
HON. SHERRY KLEIN HEITLER<br />
NO OPPOSITION SUMMARY<br />
JUDGMENT MOTION AND<br />
ORDER<br />
I<br />
WHEREFORE, defendant Consolidated Edisan Company of New York, Inc.<br />
hereby requests summary judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law<br />
and Rules Section 321 2, dismissing plainties complaint against defendant Consolidated Edison<br />
Company of New York, hc. with prejudice, and there being no opposition thereto,<br />
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defcendmts, dl claims and cross-claims<br />
against defendant Consolidated Edism Company of New York, h., be and -. the same are hereby<br />
- . I--- - -<br />
dismissed with prejudice and without costs.<br />
Dated: N ~w yo,rk, New York<br />
WEITZ & LUXEmERG, P.C<br />
Attorneys for Plaintiff<br />
180 M~den Lane<br />
New York, NY 10038-4925<br />
C. &:<br />
4 Irving Place<br />
New York, N Y$oQ~-#PE D<br />
SO ORJIERED: APR 2 6 20<strong>11</strong><br />
)UT File No<br />
NEV\J YWK<br />
8-7732-00 CoCj~n<br />
APR 1 'fs "rt<br />
.' EWK'S OFFICE'
~~ COUNTY<br />
I<br />
SUPREME COURT OF TliE SThTBQF NEW YORK<br />
OF NEW YORK -<br />
IN RE: NEW YOKK COUNTY‘<br />
ASBESTOS LITIGATION<br />
.<br />
THIS DCICUMENT REFERS TO:<br />
MARY ROMANO, INDIVJBUALLY AND AS<br />
EXECUTRIX FOR TIHE ESTATE OF GIN0<br />
ROMANO,<br />
-against-<br />
i NYCAL<br />
1 I.A.S. Part 30<br />
i (Heitler, J.)<br />
j<br />
i<br />
a<br />
Index No.: 15836/00 08386/00<br />
[ NO OPPOSITION<br />
! SUMMARY JUDGMENT<br />
Plaintiffs, i MOTION AND OmER<br />
A. C. & S., INC., et ul.,<br />
Defendants. i<br />
WHEREFORE, defendant, Treadwell Corporation, hereby requests summary judgment in<br />
I<br />
the above entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules 0 3212, dismissing plaintiffs’<br />
complaint against defendant, Treadwell Corporation, with prejudice in this action, and there<br />
being no opposition thereto,<br />
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against<br />
defendant, Treadwell Corporation, be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and<br />
without costs.<br />
Dated: New York, New York<br />
Carol M. Tempesta, Esq.<br />
Attorney for Defendant<br />
Treadwell Corporation<br />
MCGlVNEY & UUGER, P.C.<br />
80 Broad Street-Suite 2300<br />
New York, New York I00<strong>04</strong><br />
(212) 509-3454<br />
5<br />
Estate of Gino Romano<br />
WEIT2 & LUXENBERG, P.<br />
700 Broadway<br />
New York, New York 10003 APR 2 6 2012<br />
SO ORDERED,<br />
Hon. Shew Klein Heitler<br />
cnM3Y5’ss;<br />
b;Ev,/ ‘(CIRK<br />
L c R OFFICE’ ~ ~<br />
N0<strong>04</strong><strong>04</strong>78-1<br />
*’ ><br />
I! 2 5 ~~~~
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK<br />
COUNTY OF NEW YORK<br />
1N RE: NEW YORK COUNTY<br />
ASBESTOS LITIGATION<br />
THIS DOCUMENT REFERS TO:<br />
MARY ROMANO, INDIVIDUALLY AND AS<br />
EXECUTRlX FOR THE ESTATE OF GIN0<br />
ROMANO,<br />
Plaintiffs,<br />
! NYCAL<br />
i X.A.S. Part 30<br />
(HeitIer, J.)<br />
a<br />
j Index No. 15836/0 108386/00<br />
!<br />
NO OPPOSITION<br />
i SUMMARY JUDGMENT<br />
i MOTION AND ORDER<br />
... I<br />
-against-<br />
A. C. & S., INC., et al.,<br />
Defendants. 1<br />
WHEREFORE, defendant, Safeguard Industrial Equipment Co., hereby requests<br />
summary judgment in the above entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules fi 3212,<br />
dismissing plaintiffs' complaint against defendant, Safeguard Industrial Equipment Co., with<br />
prejudice in this action, and there being no opposition thereto,<br />
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against<br />
defendant, Safeguard Industrial Equipment Co., be and the same are hereby dismissed with<br />
prejudice and without costs.<br />
Attorney fddfendant<br />
Attorney for Plaintiffs<br />
Safeguard Industrial Equipment CO.<br />
MCGIVNEY & KLUGER, P.C.<br />
Estate of Gino Romano<br />
WEITZ & LUXENBERG, P.C.<br />
80 Broad Street-Suite 2300<br />
700 Broadway<br />
New York, New York 100<strong>04</strong><br />
New York, New York 10003 2 6 20<strong>11</strong><br />
(212) 509-3456<br />
(212) 558-5500<br />
NEW YOFiK<br />
SO ORDERED,<br />
couNm CLERK'S OF/=jc€<br />
Hon. Sh& Klein Heitler 324-5095C
I-<br />
SUPREME COURT OF THE STA1’E OF NEW YORK<br />
-- COUNTY OF NEW YOKK - -. ..-<br />
IN RE: NEW YORK COUNTY<br />
! NYCAL<br />
A 5 BESTOS IdITIGATI ON<br />
i I.A.S. Part 30<br />
----<br />
i (Heitler, J.)<br />
‘THIS DOCUMENT REFERS TO:<br />
Index No.: 1 1 S972/0O<br />
ANTOINETTE MARK0 KOELLER, A<br />
PERSONAL REPERESENTATIVE FOR THE<br />
ESTATE OF MAGDALENA MARY<br />
NO OPPOSITION<br />
AGRJCOLA,<br />
SUMMARY JUDGMENT<br />
MOTION AND ORDER<br />
Plaintiffs,<br />
-against-<br />
A. C. & S., TNC., et ul.,<br />
--<br />
Defendants.<br />
WHEREFORE, defendant, Courter & Company, Inc., hereby requests summary<br />
judgment in the above entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules $ 3212, dismissing<br />
plaintiffs’ complaint against defendant, Courter & Company, Inc., with prejudice in this action,<br />
and there being no opposition thereto,<br />
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against<br />
defendant, Courter & Company, Inc., be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and<br />
without costs.<br />
Michele J. Mittleman, Esq.<br />
Attorney for Defendant<br />
Courter & Company, Inc.<br />
McGIWY & UUGER, P.C.<br />
80 Broad Street-Suite 2300<br />
New York, New York 100<strong>04</strong><br />
(212) 509-3456<br />
SO ORDERED,<br />
Estate of Magdalena M<br />
WElTZ & LUXENBERG, P.C.<br />
<strong>11</strong>22-19539<br />
N0<strong>04</strong><strong>04</strong>78-1<br />
APR 15 20<strong>11</strong>1
SUPREME COURT OF IHE STAlE OF NEW YORK<br />
COUNTY OF NEW YORK<br />
IN RE: NEW YORK COUNTY j NYCAL<br />
ASBESTOS LITIGATION<br />
1 I.A.S. Part 30<br />
(Hei tler, J .><br />
THIS DOCUMENT REFERS TO:<br />
ANTOINETTE MARK0 KOELLER, A<br />
PERSONAL REPERESENTATIVE FOR THE<br />
ESTATE OF MAGDALENA MARY<br />
AGRICOLA,<br />
-against-<br />
A. C. & S., INC., et al.,<br />
Plaintiffs,<br />
Defendants.<br />
Index No.: 1 15972/00<br />
NO OPPOSITION<br />
SUMMARY JUDGMENT<br />
MOTION AND ORDER<br />
WHEREFORE, defendant, Treadwell Corporation, hereby requests summary judgment in<br />
the above entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules 8 3212, dismissing plaintiffs'<br />
complaint against defendant, Treadwell Corporation, with prejudice in this action, and there<br />
being no opposition thereto,<br />
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against<br />
defendant, Treadwell Corporation, be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and<br />
without costs.<br />
Carol M. Ternpesta, Esq.<br />
Attorney for Defendant<br />
Treadwell Corporation<br />
MCG~VNEY & KLUGER, P.C.<br />
80 Broad Street-Suite 2300<br />
New York. New York 100<strong>04</strong><br />
(212) 509-3456<br />
SO ORDERED,<br />
Attorney for Plaintiff;<br />
Estate of Magdalena Mary A&d$al<br />
WEITZ & LUXENBERG, P.C. '<br />
700 Broadway<br />
York, New York 10003 ,A 1<br />
q-5 58-5500<br />
Hon. Sherry Klein Heitler 1235-19012<br />
PIT' ,'2r<br />
Grwyw d,<br />
2 6 2QI1<br />
VORK<br />
'cL6RKs,€FFEE;<br />
N0<strong>04</strong><strong>04</strong>78-1
SIJPREME couw OF THE vs"ffl*rF; OF NEW YORK<br />
COUNTY OF NEW YORK<br />
--_I_."<br />
THIS DOCUMENT REFERS TO:<br />
ANTOINETTE MARK0 KOELLER, A<br />
PERSONAL REPERESENTATIVE FOR THE<br />
ESTATE OF MAGDALENA MARY<br />
AGRICOLA,<br />
-against-<br />
A. C. & S., XNC., et al.,<br />
Plaintiffs,<br />
Defendants.<br />
NYCAL<br />
I.A.S. Part 30<br />
(Heitler, J.)<br />
Index No.: 1 15972/00<br />
NO OPPOSITION<br />
SUMMARY JUDGMENT<br />
MOTION AND ORDER<br />
WHEREFOEE, defendant, Tishman Liquidating Corp., hereby requests summary<br />
judgment in the above entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules 5 3212, dismissing<br />
plaintiffs' complaint against defendant, 'Tishman Liquidating Corp., with prejudice in this action,<br />
and there being no opposition thereto,<br />
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against<br />
defendant, Tishman Liquidating Cop, be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and<br />
without costs.<br />
MCGIVNEY & KLUGER, P.C.<br />
80 Broad Street-Suite 2300<br />
New York, New York 100<strong>04</strong><br />
(212) 509-3456<br />
Estate of Magdalena Mary Agricola<br />
WElTZ & LUXENBERG, P.C.<br />
700 Broadway<br />
New York, New York 10003<br />
SO ORDERED,<br />
Hon. Sherry Kleih Heitler 2383-2960
SUPREME COURT OF THE STAlE OF NEW YORK<br />
- COUNTY OF .I__- NEW YORK<br />
IN N3: NEW YORK COUNI'Y-'='-<br />
! NYCAL<br />
ASBESTOS LI'IIGATION<br />
! I.A.S. Part 30<br />
-I-.-I<br />
! (Heitler, J,)<br />
THIS DOCUMENT REFERS TO:<br />
.--I<br />
j Index No.: <strong>11</strong>6672/00<br />
!<br />
i<br />
CAROL D'AMORE, INDIVIDUALLY AND AS<br />
EXECUTRIX FOR THE ESTATE OF GERALD<br />
J. D'AMORE, i NO OPPOSITION<br />
! SUMMARY JUDGMENT<br />
Plaintiffs, ! MOTION AND ORDER<br />
-against-<br />
A. C. & S., INC., et al.,<br />
Defendants.<br />
i<br />
WHEREFORE, defendant, Courter & Company, Inc., hereby requests summary<br />
judgment in the above entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules $ 3212, dismissing<br />
plaintiffs' complaint against defendant, Courter & Company, Inc., with prejudice in this action,<br />
and there being no opposition thereto,<br />
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against<br />
defendant, Courter & Company, Inc., be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and<br />
without costs.<br />
Dated: New Yo&, New York<br />
Michele J. Mittlehan, Esq.<br />
Attorney for Defendant<br />
Courter & Company, Inc.<br />
MCGIVNEY & KLUGER, P.C.<br />
80 Broad Street-Suite 2300<br />
New York, New York 100<strong>04</strong><br />
(212) 509-3456<br />
SO ORDERED,<br />
700 Broadway<br />
, New York 10003<br />
@ 2 6 m'<br />
N0<strong>04</strong><strong>04</strong>78-1<br />
APR 15 20<strong>11</strong>
SIJPREME couw OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK<br />
COUNTY OF NEW YORK<br />
IN RE: NEW YORK COUNTY<br />
NY CAI,<br />
ASBESTOS 1,ITIGATION<br />
1.A.S. Part 30<br />
(Heitler, J.)<br />
THIS DOCUMENT REFERS TO:<br />
CAROL D’AMORE, INDIVIDUALLY AND AS<br />
EXECUTRIX FOR THE ESTATE OF GERALD<br />
J. D’AMORE,<br />
-against-<br />
A. C. & S., INC., et ul.,<br />
Plaintiffs,<br />
Defendants.<br />
Index No.: 1 16672/00<br />
NO OPPOSITION<br />
SUMMARY JUDGMENT<br />
MOTION AND OmER<br />
WHEREFORE, defendant, Treadwell Corporation, hereby requests summary judgment in<br />
the above entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Q 3212, dismissing plaintiffs’<br />
complaint against defendant, Treadwell Corporation, with prejudice in this action, and there<br />
being no opposition thereto,<br />
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against<br />
defendant, Treadwell Corporation, be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and<br />
without costs.<br />
Dated: New Y rk, New York<br />
,20<strong>11</strong><br />
Carol M. Tempesta, Esq.<br />
Attorney for Defendant<br />
Treadwell Corporation<br />
MCG~VNEY & KLUGER, P.C.<br />
80 Broad Street-Suite 2300<br />
New York, New York 100<strong>04</strong><br />
(2 12) 509-3456<br />
SO ORDERED,<br />
Estate if Gerald J. D’Amore<br />
FILE<br />
WElTZ & LUXENBERG, P.C. D<br />
700 Broadway<br />
NewYork,NewYork 10003 APR 2 6 20<strong>11</strong><br />
k”W YORK<br />
COUNTY CLERK‘S OFFJ~<br />
1235-2462<br />
N0<strong>04</strong><strong>04</strong>78-1<br />
APR 152018,
--_I-<br />
SUPREME COURl' OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK : I<br />
COUNTY OF NEW YORK<br />
IN RE: NEW YORK COUN'I'Y<br />
f NYCAL<br />
ASBESTOS I,TTIGA?'ION i I.A.S. Part 30<br />
i (Heitler, J.)<br />
---1<br />
THIS DOCUMENT REFERS TO:<br />
CAROL D'AMORE, INDIVIDUALLY AND AS<br />
EXECUTRIX FOR THE ESTATE OF GERALD<br />
i Index No.: I 16672/00<br />
!<br />
1<br />
J. D'AMORE, i NO OPPOSITION I<br />
-against-<br />
Plaintiffs,<br />
j<br />
SUMMARY JUDGMENT<br />
MOTION AND 0IU)ER<br />
A. C. & S., INC., et al., I<br />
Defendants.<br />
WHEREFORE, defendant, Tishman Liquidating Corp., hereby requests summary<br />
judgment in the above entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules § 3212, dismissing<br />
plaintiffs' complaint against defendant, Tishman Liquidating Corp., with prejudice in this action,<br />
and there being no opposition thereto,<br />
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against<br />
defendant, Tishman Liquidating Corp., be and the same are hereby dismissed wi<br />
without costs.<br />
Dated: New Ymk. New York<br />
ApR 2 6 20''<br />
I<br />
MCGIVNEY & KLUG~R, P:C.<br />
WEITZ & LUXENBERG, P.C.<br />
700 Broadwav<br />
80 Broad Street-Suite 2300<br />
New York, New York 100<strong>04</strong> New York, N;'ew York 10003<br />
(212) 509-3456<br />
SO ORDERED,<br />
2383-2970<br />
N0<strong>04</strong><strong>04</strong>78-I
~ DJ<br />
_I<br />
SUPREME COIJK’T OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK<br />
----~<br />
COUNTY OF NEW YON --<br />
RE: NEW YORK COUNTY<br />
i NYCAI,<br />
ASBESTOS LITIGATION<br />
j I.A.S. Part 30<br />
i (Heitler, J.)<br />
‘THIS DOCUMENT REFERS TO:<br />
i Index No.: <strong>11</strong>6927/00<br />
WILLIAM J. DONNELLY AND MARIE<br />
DONNELLY,<br />
/ NO OPPOSITION<br />
P1 ain ti ffs, ! SUMMARY JUDGMENT<br />
j MOTION AND ORDER<br />
-against-<br />
A. C. & S., INC., et al.,<br />
-- Defendants. i<br />
WHEREFORE, defendant, Treadwell Corporation, hereby requests summary ddgrnent in<br />
the above entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules 9 3212, dismissing plaintiffs’<br />
complaint against defendant, Treadwell Corporation, with prejudice in this action, and there<br />
being no opposition thereto,<br />
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against<br />
defendant, Treadwell Corporation, be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and<br />
without costs.<br />
-La<br />
Carol M. Tempesta, Esq.<br />
Attorney for Defendant<br />
Treadwell Corporation<br />
MCGIVNEY & KLUGER, P.C.<br />
80 Broad Street-Suite 2300<br />
New York, New York 100<strong>04</strong><br />
(212) 509-3456<br />
William J. Donnelly and Marie Donnelly<br />
WElTZ & LUXENBERG, P.C.
----I--- -_-.---<br />
STJPREME COlJKT OF THE STATE OF NEW YOKK<br />
COUN'I'Y OF NEW YOKK<br />
-I_.<br />
IN RE: NEW YORK COUNTY<br />
.-<br />
i NYCAL<br />
ASBESTOS LI'T'IGATION<br />
j I.A.S. Part 30<br />
WILLIAM J. DONNELLY AND MARIE<br />
DONNELLY,<br />
against-<br />
Plaintiffs,<br />
i Index No.: <strong>11</strong>6927/00<br />
i NO OPPOSITION<br />
SUMMARY JUDGMENT<br />
! MOTION AND ORDER<br />
A. C. & S., NC., et al.,<br />
Defendants.<br />
j<br />
WHEREFORE, defendant, Courter & Company, Inc., hereby requests summary<br />
judgment in the above entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Q 3212, dismissing<br />
plaintiffs' complaint against defendant, Courter & Company, Inc., with prejudice in this action,<br />
and there being no opposition thereto,<br />
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against<br />
defendant, Courter & Company, 'Inc., be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and<br />
without costs.<br />
Dated: New Yprk, New York<br />
Michele J. Mittlegan, Esq.<br />
Attorney for Defendant<br />
Courter & Company, Tnc.<br />
MCGIVNEY & KLUGER, P.C.<br />
80 Broad Street-Suite 2300<br />
New York, New York 100<strong>04</strong><br />
(212) 509-3456<br />
SO ORDERED,<br />
William J. Donnelly and Marie Donnelr'y<br />
WEITZ & LUXENBERG. P.C.<br />
700 Broadway<br />
New York, New York 10003<br />
<strong>11</strong> 22-<br />
apff 2 6 m'<br />
N0<strong>04</strong><strong>04</strong>78-1<br />
APR 15 20<strong>11</strong>
SUPREME COURI’ OF THE STATE OF NEW YOKK<br />
COUNTY OF NEW YORK<br />
-I__-<br />
IN RE: NEW YORK COUNTY<br />
: NYCAL<br />
ASBESTOS LITIGATION j X.A.S. Part 30<br />
; (Hcitler, J.)<br />
THIS DOCUMENT REFERS TO:<br />
Index No.: <strong>11</strong>7700/00<br />
EDWARD GOlCHMAN AND PHYLLIS<br />
GOICHM AN,<br />
NO OPPOSlTION<br />
Plaintiffs, SUMMARY JUDGMENT<br />
MOTION AND ORDER<br />
-against-<br />
A. C. & S., INC., et al.,<br />
Defendants.<br />
i<br />
WHEREFORE7 defendant, Treadwell Corporation, hereby requests summary ju,grnent in<br />
the above entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules $ 3212, dismissing plaintiffs’<br />
complaint against defendant, Treadwell Corporation, with prejudice in this action, and there<br />
being no opposition thereto,<br />
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against<br />
defendant, Treadwell Corporation, be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and<br />
without costs.<br />
Dated: New york, New York<br />
u<br />
20<strong>11</strong><br />
5Q2,w> 3<br />
Carol M. Tempesta, gsq.<br />
Attorney for Defendant<br />
Treadwell Corporation<br />
M c G ~ & Y KLUGER, P.C.<br />
80 Broad Street-Suite 2300<br />
New York, New York 100<strong>04</strong><br />
Edward Goichman and Phyllis Goichrnak ’<br />
WEITZ & LUXENBERG, P.C.<br />
700 Broadway<br />
New York, New York 10003<br />
.1<br />
D<br />
N0<strong>04</strong><strong>04</strong>78-1 APR 5 20<strong>11</strong>4
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK<br />
.I_-.- COUNTY - OF NEW YON -<br />
IN KE: NEW YORK COUNTY j NYCAL<br />
AS BE S'PO S L 1 TI G A 'r 1 ON<br />
j I.A.S. Part 30<br />
i (Heitler, J.)<br />
THIS IIOCUMENII' REFERS TO:<br />
i Index No.: <strong>11</strong>7846/00<br />
CHARLES NEWMAN AND SHIRLEY<br />
NEWMAN,<br />
-against-<br />
A+ C. & S., INC., et al.,<br />
i NO OPPOSITION<br />
Plaintiffs, j SUMMARY JUDGMENT<br />
; MOTION AND ORDER<br />
-<br />
Defendants.<br />
i<br />
WHEREFORE, defendant, Treadwell Corporation, hereby requests summary judgment in<br />
the above entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules 5 3212, dismissing plaintiffs'<br />
complaint against defendant, Treadwell Corporation, with prejudice in this action, and there<br />
being no opposition thereto,<br />
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against<br />
defendant, Treadwell Corporation, be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and<br />
without costs.<br />
Treadwell Corporation<br />
MCGI~Y & UUGER, P.C.<br />
80 Broad Street-Suite 2300<br />
New York, New Y ork 100<strong>04</strong><br />
(212) 509-3456<br />
SO ORDERED,<br />
Charles Newman and Shirley Newman<br />
WEITZ & LUXENBERG, P.C.<br />
123 1<br />
C&%"Y<br />
FILED<br />
.APR 2 6 20<strong>11</strong><br />
PEW YORM<br />
CLERKS OFFICE'
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK<br />
COUNTY OF NEW YORK<br />
IN RE: NEW YORK COUNTY<br />
NYCAL<br />
ASBESTOS LITIGATION<br />
I.A.S. Part 30<br />
(Heitler, J.)<br />
THIS DOCUMENT REFERS TO:<br />
Index No.: <strong>11</strong>0<br />
FRIEDRICH SCHEUERMANN,<br />
-against-<br />
A. C. & S., INC., et al.,<br />
Plaintiffs,<br />
Defendants.<br />
NO OPPOSITION<br />
SUMMARY JUDGMENT<br />
MOTION AND ORDER<br />
WHEREFORE, defendant, Oakfabco, Inc,, hereby requests summary judgment in the<br />
above entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules 8 3212, dismissing plaintiffs’<br />
complaint against defendant, Oakfabco, Inc., with prejudice in this action, and there being no<br />
opposition thereto,<br />
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against<br />
defendant, Oakfabco, Inc., be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and without<br />
costs.<br />
Dated: New York, New York<br />
y//7 ,20<strong>11</strong><br />
J<br />
Robert Darish, Esq.<br />
Attorney for Defendant<br />
Oakfabco, Inc.<br />
MCGIVNEY & KLUGER, P.C.<br />
80 Broad Street-Suite 2300<br />
New York, New York 100<strong>04</strong><br />
(212) 509-3456<br />
Ea.<br />
dwk3 M.<br />
F%.<br />
Attorney for Plaintiffs<br />
Friedrich Scheuermann<br />
Weitz & Luxenberg, P.C.<br />
700 Broadway<br />
ew York 10003<br />
B<br />
APR 2 6 Zo1’<br />
D<br />
I<br />
SO ORDERED,<br />
Hon. Sherry Klein Heitler<br />
2571-0790AR<br />
YORK<br />
CC7UN~y CLERKS oFFie’<br />
N0038955-1
~<br />
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK<br />
COUNTY OF NEW YORK<br />
IN RE: NEW YORK COUNTY<br />
NYCAL<br />
ASBESTOS LITIGATION<br />
I.A.S. Part 30<br />
(Heitler, J.)<br />
THIS DOCUMENT REFERS TO:<br />
RAYMOND J. SCHWARTZ AND DOROTHY A.<br />
SCHWARTZ,<br />
Index N o.~7~~<strong>11</strong>0182/00<br />
-against-<br />
A. C, & S., INC., et al.,<br />
Plaintiffs,<br />
Defendants. !<br />
NO OPPOSITION<br />
SUMMARY JUDGMENT<br />
MOTION AND ORDER<br />
WHEREFORE, defendant, Safeguard Industrial Equipment Co., hereby requests<br />
summary judgment in the above entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules 6 3212,<br />
dismissing plaintiffs’ complaint against defendant, Safeguard Industrial Equipment Co., with<br />
prejudice in this action, and there being no opposition thereto,<br />
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against<br />
defendant, Safeguard Industrial Equipment Co., be and the same are hereby dismissed with<br />
prejudice and without costs.<br />
1<br />
I<br />
New York<br />
-<br />
20<strong>11</strong><br />
--...<br />
Matth4w I). Sampar, Esq.<br />
Attome-r Defendant<br />
Safeguard Industrial Equipment Co.<br />
MCGIWEY & KLUGER, P.C.<br />
80 Broad Street-Suite 2300<br />
New York, New York 100<strong>04</strong><br />
(212) 509-3456 (7 7 / i<br />
A:<br />
SO ORDERED,<br />
Raymond J. Schwartz and Dorothy A. Schwartz<br />
WEITZ & LUXENBERG, P.C.<br />
700 Broadway<br />
New York, New York 10003<br />
(212) 558-5500<br />
APR 15 20<strong>11</strong>
SUPREME COIJKT OF THE STATE OF NEW YOKK<br />
COUNTY OF NEW YORK -~<br />
IN RE: NEW YORK COUNTY<br />
I NYCAL<br />
ASBESTOS LI1'IGATION<br />
i I.A.S. Part 30<br />
i (Heitler, J,)<br />
THIS DOCUMENT REFERS TO:<br />
RAYMONJI J. SCHWARTZ AND DOROTHY A.<br />
SCHWARTZ,<br />
A. C. & S., INC., et al.,<br />
-I<br />
Plaintiffs, ! NO OPPOSITION<br />
j SUMMARY JUDGMENT<br />
-against- i MOTION AND ORDER<br />
Defendants.<br />
j<br />
WHEREFORE, defendant, Treadwell Corporation, hereby requests summary judgment in<br />
the above entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Q 3212, dismissing plaintiffs'<br />
complaint against defendant, Treadwell Corporation, with prejudice in this action, and there<br />
being no opposition thereto,<br />
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against<br />
defendant, Treadwell Corporation, be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and<br />
without costs.<br />
Carol M. Tempesta, Esq. '<br />
Attorney for Defendant<br />
Treadwell Corporation<br />
MCGIVNEY & KLUGER, P.C.<br />
80 Broad Street-Suite 2300<br />
New York, New York 100<strong>04</strong><br />
(212) 509-3456<br />
SO ORDERED,<br />
f<br />
Hon. Sherry K ld Heitler<br />
700 Broadway<br />
(212) 558-5500<br />
2 6 20<strong>11</strong><br />
1 5-1hmW YORK<br />
c o k CLERK'S OFFICE'<br />
N0<strong>04</strong><strong>04</strong>78-1
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK<br />
COUNTY OF NEW YOKK<br />
IN m: NEW YORK cowry<br />
. ~ - -<br />
! NYCAL<br />
ASBESTOS LITIGATION<br />
THIS DOCUMENT REFERS TO:<br />
i I.A.S. Part 30<br />
i (Heitler, J.)<br />
DOROTHY MELNYK, INDIVIDUALLY AND<br />
EXECUTRIX FOR 1'HE ESTATE OF MICHAEL j<br />
A. MELNYK, / NO OPPOSITION<br />
I SUMMARY .JUDGMENT<br />
Plaintiffs, i MOTION AND ORDER<br />
-against-<br />
Defendants.<br />
WHEREFORE, defendant, Treadwell Corporation, hereby requests summary judgment in<br />
the above entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules 5 3212, dismissing plaintiffs'<br />
complaint against defendant, Treadwell Corporation, with prejudice in this action, and there<br />
being no opposition thereto,<br />
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against<br />
defendant, Treadwell Corporation, be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and<br />
without costs.<br />
Dated: New York, New York<br />
ql! ,20<strong>11</strong><br />
A<br />
Carol M. Tempesta, Esq.<br />
Attorney for Defendant<br />
Treadwell Corporation<br />
MCGIVNEY & UUGER, P.C.<br />
80 Broad Street-Suite 2300<br />
New York, New York 100<strong>04</strong><br />
(212) 509-3456<br />
SO ORDERED,<br />
WEITZ & LUXENBERG, P.C.<br />
700 Broadway<br />
New York, New York 10003 APZ 2 6 20<strong>11</strong><br />
pc 1 L' (,$! y 9RK<br />
COUNTY CLERKS OFFICE]<br />
123513909<br />
N0<strong>04</strong><strong>04</strong>78-1
SlJPKEME COURT OF TEE STATE OF NEW YOKK<br />
mumy OF NEW yorx<br />
IN RE: NEW YORK COUNTY i NYCAL<br />
ASBESTOS LlTlGATlON<br />
j I.A.S. Part 30<br />
- i (Heitler, J.)<br />
THIS DOCUMENTREFERS TO:<br />
j Index No.: <strong>11</strong>8460/00<br />
SHARON B. HARVEY, INDIVJDIJALLY AND<br />
ADMWISTRATRIX FOR 'WE ESTATE OF<br />
RICHARD L. HARVEY,<br />
-against-<br />
PI aintiffs,<br />
i NO OPPOSITION<br />
j SUMMARY JUDGMENT<br />
i MOTION AND ORDER<br />
I<br />
A. C. & S., INC., et a].,<br />
Defendants. !<br />
WHEREFOFE, defendant, Patterson Pump Co., hereby requests summary judgment in<br />
the above entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules 5 3212, dismissing plaintiffs'<br />
complaint against defendant, Patterson Pump Co., with prejudice in this action, and there being<br />
no opposition thereto,<br />
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against<br />
defendant, Patterson Pump Co., be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and without<br />
costs.<br />
Dated: New Yor.k,,New York<br />
-<br />
Attorney fo7Defendant<br />
Patterson Pump Co.<br />
MCGIVNEY & KLUGER, P.C.<br />
SO Broad Street-Suite 2300<br />
New Yoxk, New York 100<strong>04</strong><br />
(212) 509-3456<br />
SO ORDERED,<br />
Estate of Richard L.<br />
WE~TZ & LUXENBERG, P.C.<br />
700 Broadway<br />
New York, New York I 0003<br />
APR 2 6 Zo1'<br />
D<br />
pq""-'s\J YORK<br />
Ty CERKS OFF^<br />
N0<strong>04</strong><strong>04</strong>78-1
SUPKEME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK<br />
-.-_-COUNTY OF NEW YORK --_--<br />
IN RE: NEW YOKK COUNTY<br />
NYCAL<br />
ASBESTOS LITIGATlON<br />
I.A.S. Part 30<br />
.-<br />
(Heitler, J .)<br />
THIS DOCUMENT REFERS TO:<br />
SHARON B. HARVEY, INDIVIDUALLY AND<br />
AS ADMINISTRATRIX FOR THE ESTATE OF<br />
RICHARD L. HARVEY,<br />
-against-<br />
A. C. & S., INC., et al.,<br />
Plaintiffs,<br />
Defendants.<br />
Index No.: 1 18460/00<br />
NO OPPOSITION<br />
SUMMARY JUDGMENT<br />
MOTION AND OFtDER<br />
WHEREFORE, defendant, Tishrnan Liquidating Corp., hereby requests summary<br />
judgment in the above entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules 9 3212, dismissing<br />
plaintiffs’ complaint against defendant, Tishman Liquidating Corp., with prejudice in this action,<br />
and there being no opposition thereto,<br />
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against<br />
defendant, Tishman Liquidating Corp., be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and<br />
without costs.<br />
Dated: New Yoyk, New York<br />
Abrney for D f ndant<br />
Tishman Liquiuing Corp.<br />
MCG~VNEY & UUGER, P.C.<br />
80 Broad Street-Suite 2300<br />
New Y ork, New Y ork 100<strong>04</strong><br />
(212) 509-3456<br />
SO ORDE<br />
WEITZ & LUXENBERG, P.C.<br />
700 Broadway<br />
New Y ork, New York 10003<br />
2383-4059<br />
FFICE’<br />
N0<strong>04</strong><strong>04</strong>78-1<br />
IAPR 15 2<strong>04</strong>1
_I Defendants.<br />
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK<br />
COUNTY OF NEW YORK<br />
IN RE: NEW YOKK. COIJN7'Y i NYCAL<br />
ASBESTOS LITIGATION<br />
i I.A.S. Part 30<br />
_I .-<br />
i (Heitler,<br />
,<br />
J.)<br />
,<br />
THIS DOCUMENT REFERS TO:<br />
i Index No.: 1 18502/00<br />
TINA MARIE MCGOWENS, PERSONAL<br />
REPRESENTATIVE FOR THE ESTATE OF<br />
CONRAD LACHANCE,<br />
i \ NO OPPOSITION<br />
-against-<br />
i SUMMARY JUDGMENT<br />
Plaintiffs, \ MOTION AND ORDER<br />
A. C. & S., TNC., et al.,<br />
i<br />
WHEREFORE, defendant, Treadwell Corporation, hereby requests summary judgment in<br />
the above entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules 5 3212, dismissing plaintiffs'<br />
complaint against defendant, Treadwell Corporation, with prejudice in this action, and there<br />
being no opposition thereto,<br />
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against<br />
defendant, Treadwell Corporation, be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and<br />
without costs.<br />
Dated: New York, New Yoxk<br />
Treadwell Corporation<br />
MCGIVNEY & KLUGER, P.C.<br />
80 Broad Street-Suite 2300<br />
New York, New York 100<strong>04</strong><br />
(212) 509-3456<br />
Estate of Conrad Lachance<br />
WElTZ & LUXENBERG, P.C.<br />
700 Broadway<br />
New York, New York 10003<br />
(212) 558-5500<br />
FILED<br />
APR 2 6 20<strong>11</strong><br />
SO ORDERED,
SI IPKEME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK<br />
- C33IJN'I'Y _-- OF NEW YORK _____----<br />
IN RE: NEW YOKK COUNTY<br />
! NYCAL,<br />
ASBESTOS LlTlGATlON j 1.A.S. Part 30<br />
j (Heitler, J.)<br />
-_____"___L__~-__I_<br />
TkIE DOCUMENT REFERS TO:<br />
lndex No.: <strong>11</strong> S679/00<br />
ELVIM M. DUBRITZ, EXECIJTRIX FOR THE<br />
ESTATE OF MICHAEL DUBRITZ,<br />
NO OPPOSITION<br />
Plaintiffs, SUMMARY JUDGMENT<br />
MOTION AND ORDER<br />
-against-<br />
A. C. & S., INC., et al.,<br />
Defendants.<br />
i<br />
WHEREFORE, defendant, Patterson Pump Co., hereby requests summary judgment in<br />
the above entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules 4 3212, dismissing plaintiffs'<br />
complaint against defendant, Patterson Pump Co., with prejudice in this action, and there being<br />
no opposition thereto,<br />
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against<br />
defendant, Patterson Pump Co., be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and without<br />
costs.<br />
MCGIVNEY & KLUGER, P.C.<br />
80 Broad ftreet-Suite 2300<br />
New York, New York 100<strong>04</strong><br />
(2 12) 509-3456<br />
SO ORDERED,<br />
Estate of Michael DuBritz<br />
WEITZ & LUXENBERG, P.C.<br />
700 Broadway<br />
New York, New York 10 3<br />
FILED<br />
APR 2 6 20<strong>11</strong><br />
454-1%FW YORK<br />
COUNTY CLERKS OFFICE]
~<br />
SUPREME COlJKT OF 'THE STATE OF NEW YOKK<br />
--- COUNTY OF NEW YON<br />
"-__--_I--<br />
IN RE: NEW YORK COUNTY<br />
i NYCAL<br />
ASBESTOS LITlGATXON j I.A.S. Part 30<br />
L<br />
-_- 1 (Heitler, J.)<br />
THIS DOCUMENT REFERS TO:<br />
ELVIM M. DU BRITZ, INDIVIDUALLY AND<br />
AS EXECUTRIX FOR THE ESTATE OF<br />
MICHAEL DU BRITZ,<br />
Plaintiffs,<br />
t Index No.: <strong>11</strong> 8679/00<br />
i<br />
j<br />
NO OPPOSITION<br />
SUMMARY JUDGMENT<br />
MOTION AND ORDER<br />
-against-<br />
A. C. & S., INC., et al.,<br />
-<br />
Defendants. ;<br />
WHEREFORE, defendant, Courter & Company, Inc., hereby requests summary<br />
judgment in the above entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules $ 3212, dismissing<br />
plaintiffs' complaint against defendant, Courter & Company, Inc., with prejudice in this action,<br />
and there being no opposition thereto,<br />
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against<br />
defendant, Courter & Company, Inc., be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and<br />
without costs.<br />
Attorney for Defendant<br />
Courter & Company, Jnc.<br />
MCGIVNEY & KLUGER, P.C.<br />
80 Broad Street-Suite 2300<br />
New York, New Y ork 100<strong>04</strong><br />
(212) 509-3456<br />
SO OmERED,<br />
Estate of Michael DuBritz<br />
WEITZ & LUXENBERG, P.C.<br />
700 Broadway<br />
New York,NewYork 10003 APR 2 6 20<strong>11</strong><br />
3W938<br />
NEW YORK<br />
Nn CLERKS OFFICE)<br />
N0<strong>04</strong><strong>04</strong>78-1
SLJYREME COIJR'P OF THE STATE OF NEW YON<br />
COUNTY OF NEW YON<br />
IN-FNEW YOKK CZUNTY<br />
i NYCAL<br />
ASBESTOS LITIGATION<br />
i I.A.S. Part 30<br />
- i (Heitler, 3.)<br />
THIS DOCUMENT REFERS TO:<br />
ELVIRA M. DUBRITZ, INDIVIDUALLY AND<br />
AS EXECUTRIX FOR THE ESTATE OF<br />
MICHAEL DUBRITZ,<br />
-against-<br />
A. C. & S., INC., et al.,<br />
j Index No.: 1 18679/00<br />
!<br />
[ NO OPPOSITION<br />
i SUMMARY JUDGMENT<br />
Plaintiffs, i MOTION AND ORDER<br />
Defendants. !<br />
WHEREFORE, defendant, Tishman Liquidating Cop., hereby requests summary<br />
judgment in the above entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules 8 3212, dismissing<br />
plaintiffs' complaint against defendant, Tishman Liquidating Cop, with prejudice in this action,<br />
and there being no opposition thereto,<br />
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against<br />
defendant, Tishman Liquidating Corp., be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and<br />
without costs.<br />
80 Broad Street-Suite 2300<br />
New York, New York 100<strong>04</strong><br />
Estate of Michael DuBritz<br />
WEITZ&LUXENBERG,P.C. F \ L E D<br />
700 Broadway<br />
New York, New York 10003<br />
(212) SO9-3456 (212) 558-5500 APR 2 6 ZO'<br />
SO ORDERED,<br />
NEW WRK<br />
z38eSeff.rru CLERKS OFFICE<br />
N0<strong>04</strong><strong>04</strong>78-I
I<br />
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YOKK<br />
I_ COUNTY OF NEW YORK<br />
IN RE: NEW YORK COUNTY<br />
i NYCAI,<br />
ASBESTOS LITlGATION<br />
i I.A.S. Part 30<br />
i (Heitler, J.><br />
THIS DOCUMENTREFERS ‘ro:<br />
E1,VIRA M. DU BRITZ, INDIVID‘IJALLY AND<br />
AS EXECUTRIX FOR THE ESTATE OF<br />
MICHAEL DU BRITZ,<br />
-against-<br />
A. C. & S., INC., et al.,<br />
Plaintiffs,<br />
j Index No.: 1 18679/00<br />
i<br />
i<br />
NO OPPOSITION<br />
i SUMMARY JUDGMENT<br />
j MOTION AND ORDER<br />
Defendants.<br />
j<br />
WHEREFORE, defendant, Treadwell Corporation, hereby requests summary judgment in<br />
the above entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules 0 3212, dismissing plaintiffs’<br />
complaint against defendant, Treadwell Corporation, with prejudice in this action, and there<br />
being no opposition thereto,<br />
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against<br />
defendant, Treadwell Corporation, be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and<br />
without costs.<br />
Michele J. Mittleman, Esq.<br />
Attorney for Defendant<br />
Treadwell Corporation<br />
MCGIVNEY & KLUGER, P.C.<br />
WEITZ & LUXENBERG, P.C.<br />
80 Broad Street-Suite 2300 700 Broadway 6 ZQII<br />
New York. New York 100<strong>04</strong><br />
New York, New York 10003 APR<br />
(212) 509-3456 (212) 558-5500<br />
SO ORDERED,<br />
1235-2461<br />
OFF\=<br />
N0<strong>04</strong><strong>04</strong>78-1
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK<br />
couN'ry OF NEW YORK<br />
IN RE: NEW YOU com-ry<br />
--~__-.-<br />
NYCAL<br />
ASBESTOS LITIGATION<br />
i I.A.S. Part 30<br />
i (Heitler, J.)<br />
-~---- -.-A<br />
THIS DOCUMENT REFERS TO:<br />
BR1DGET JONES, ADMINISTRATRIX FOR !<br />
THE ESTATE OF CHARLES E. WILLIAMS,<br />
j<br />
i NO OPPOSITION<br />
Plaintiffs, i SUMMARY JUDGMENT<br />
j MOTION AND ORDER<br />
-against-<br />
A. C. & S., PIC+, et al.,<br />
---- Defendants. j<br />
i<br />
WHEREFORE, defendant, Treadwell Corporation, hereby requests summary judgment in<br />
the above entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules $ 3212, dismissing plaintiffs'<br />
complaint against defendant, Treadwell Corporation, with prejudice in this action, and there<br />
being no opposition thereto,<br />
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against<br />
defendant, Treadwell Corporation, be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and<br />
without costs.<br />
Dated: New Yoyk, New York<br />
llih<br />
- --<br />
Michele J. Mittlekan, Esq.<br />
Attorney for Defendant<br />
Treadwell Corporation<br />
MCGTVNEY & UUGER, P.C.<br />
80 Broad Street-Suite 2300<br />
New York, New York 100<strong>04</strong><br />
(212) 509-3456<br />
SO ORDERED,<br />
F a<br />
Attorney fo<br />
Estate of Charles E. Williams<br />
WElTZ & LUXENBERG, P.C.<br />
700 Broadway<br />
New York, New York 10003<br />
D<br />
APR 2 6 '"'<br />
V g y J yQHK<br />
CQUN-Ty CLERKS OFF'^'<br />
1235-1508
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK<br />
COUNTY OF NEW YORK<br />
' NYCAL<br />
BRIDGET JONES, as Administratrix for the Estate of :<br />
part 3o<br />
CHARLES E. WILLIAMS,<br />
: (Hon. Sherry Klein Heitler)<br />
Plaintiff(s),<br />
1 Index No.: <strong>11</strong>9159-00<br />
-against-<br />
NO-OPPOSITION SUMMARY<br />
JUDGMENT MOTION AND<br />
A.C. & S., INC., et al.,<br />
: ORDER<br />
Defendants.<br />
WHEREFORE, defendant CRANE CO. hereby requests summary judgment in the<br />
above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212, dismissing<br />
plaintiff's complaint against defendant CRANE CO. with prejudice, and there being no<br />
opposition thereto,<br />
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against<br />
defendant CRANE CO. be, and the same are hereby, dismissed with prejudice and without costs.<br />
Dated:<br />
3 \ >e\?<br />
New York. New York<br />
I .<br />
Kirste<br />
J<br />
Alford Kneis, Esq.<br />
WEITZ & LUXENBERG, P.C.<br />
K& GATESLLP<br />
Attorneys for Plaintiff(s)<br />
At meys for Defendant APR 2 6 20<strong>11</strong><br />
700 Broadway CRANE CO.<br />
New York, NY 10003<br />
(212) 558-5500<br />
599 Lexington Avenue<br />
New York, NY 10022<br />
(212) 536-3900<br />
$qJv YORM<br />
pnlj(v r'q CLERK'S OFFICE,<br />
SO ORDERED,<br />
Hon. Sherry Klein Heitler
__I-<br />
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK<br />
-__I.- COUN'I'Y OF NEW YOKK<br />
IN RE: NEW YORK couN'ry<br />
! NYCAL<br />
ASRESI'OS LITIGATION<br />
j 1.A.S. Part 30<br />
i (Heitler, J.)<br />
-___ -A<br />
THIS DOCUMENT REFERS TO:<br />
j Index No.: <strong>11</strong>9159/0<br />
BRIDGET JONES, ADMINISTRATRIX FOR !<br />
THE ESTATE OF CHARLES E. WILLIAMS,<br />
-against-<br />
A. C. & S., NC., et UL,<br />
! NO OPPOSITTON<br />
Plaintiffs, i SUMMARY JUDGMENT<br />
; MOTION AND ORDER<br />
Defendants.<br />
i<br />
WHEREFORE, defendant, Treadwell Corporation, hereby requests summary judgment in<br />
the above entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules 5 3212, dismissing plaintiffs'<br />
complaint against defendant, Treadwell Corporation, with prejudice in this action, and there<br />
being no opposition thereto,<br />
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against<br />
defendant, Treadwell Corporation, be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and<br />
without costs.<br />
Attorney for Defendant<br />
Treadwell Corporation<br />
M c G ~ & Y KLUGER, P.C.<br />
80 Broad Street-Suite 2300<br />
New York, New York 100<strong>04</strong> . New York, New York 10003
SUPREME CQTJKT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK<br />
COUNTY OF NEW YORK<br />
IN RE: NEW YON COUNTY<br />
! NYCAL<br />
ASBESTOS LITIGATION<br />
i I.A.S. Part 30<br />
i (Heitler, J . h<br />
THlS DOCUMENT EFERS TO:<br />
Index No/:J19376/09( 1070201/01<br />
ELIZABETH WALTER, INDIVIDUALY AND<br />
AS EXEC. FOR THE ESTATE OF THEODORE<br />
i<br />
F. WALKER, NO OPPOSITION<br />
i SUMMARY JUDGMENT<br />
Plaintiffs, MOTION AND ORDER<br />
-^__IC_-<br />
-against-<br />
A. C. & S., INC., etal.,<br />
Defendants.<br />
i<br />
WHEREFORE, defendant, Treadwell Corporation, hereby requests summary judgment in<br />
the above entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules 5 3212, dismissing plaintiffs’<br />
complaint against defendant, Treadwell Corporation, with prejudice in this action, and there<br />
being no opposition thereto,<br />
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against<br />
defendant, Treadwell Corporation, be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and<br />
without costs.<br />
Attorney for Defendant<br />
Treadwell Corporation<br />
MCGlVNEY & UUGER, P.C.<br />
80 Broad Street-Suite 2300<br />
New York, New York 100<strong>04</strong><br />
(212) 509-3456<br />
SO ORDERED,<br />
700 Broadway<br />
New York, New York 10003<br />
1<br />
APB 2 ””<br />
N0<strong>04</strong><strong>04</strong>78-1<br />
APR 15 20<strong>11</strong>
' I<br />
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK<br />
COUNTY OF NEW YON<br />
--<br />
IN RE: NEW YQRK COUNTY<br />
ASBESTOS LITIGATION<br />
THIS DOCUMENT R~FERS TO:<br />
: NYCAL<br />
j I.A.S. Part 30<br />
: (Heitler, J.)<br />
JOAN C. SPARLING, AS EXECUTRIX FOR<br />
THE ESTATE OF OSCAR H. SPARLING, AND<br />
JOAN C. SPARLING, INDIVIDUALLY,<br />
j<br />
A. C. & S., INC., et al.,<br />
Plaintiffs, j NO OPPOSITION<br />
i SUMMARY JUDGMENT<br />
-against- j MOTION AND ORDER<br />
-<br />
Defendants. ;<br />
WHEREFORE, defendant, Oakfabco, Inc., hereby requests summary judgment in the<br />
above entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules 5 3212, dismissing plaintiffs'<br />
complaint against defendant, Oakfabco, Inc., with prejudice in this action, and there being no<br />
opposition thereto,<br />
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against<br />
defendant, Oakfabco, Inc., be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and without<br />
costs.<br />
Dated: New York, New York<br />
Attorney for Defendant<br />
Oakfabco, Inc.<br />
MCGIVNEY & KLUGER, P.C.<br />
80 Broad Street-Suite 2300<br />
New York, New York 100<strong>04</strong><br />
(2 12) 509-3456<br />
SO ORDERED,<br />
-<br />
E<br />
Estate of Oscar H. Sparling<br />
WEITZ & LUXENBERG, P.C.<br />
700 Broadway<br />
New York, New York 10003 APR 2 6 20<strong>11</strong><br />
NEW YORK<br />
COUNTY CLERK'S OFFICk<br />
2571-07568<br />
N0<strong>04</strong><strong>04</strong>74-1<br />
"T 1520<strong>11</strong>'
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK<br />
COIJNTY OF NEW YORK<br />
IN RE: NEW YOFX COUNTY<br />
NYCAL<br />
ASBESTOS LITIGATION<br />
I.A.S. Part 30<br />
(Heitler, J.)<br />
THIS DOCUMENT REFERS TO:<br />
DONNA M. MEDER, PERSONAL<br />
REPRESENTATIVE FOR THE ESTATE OF<br />
DONALD E. SIERING,<br />
-against-<br />
A. C. & S., INC., el al.,<br />
Plaintiffs,<br />
Defendants.<br />
G%P<br />
Index No. <strong>11</strong>9379/0 107081/01,<br />
NO OPPOSITION<br />
SUMMARY JUDGMENT<br />
MOTION AND ORDER<br />
WHEREFORE, defendant, Treadwell Corporation, hereby requests summary judgment in<br />
the above entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules 5 3212, dismissing plaintiffs’<br />
complaint against defendant, Treadwell Corporation, with prejudice in this action, and there<br />
being no opposition thereto,<br />
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against<br />
defendant, Treadwell Corporation, be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and<br />
without costs.<br />
Dated: New York, New York<br />
Attorney for Defendant<br />
Treadwell Corporation<br />
MCG~VNEY & UUGER, P.C.<br />
SO Broad Street-Suite 2300<br />
New York, New York 100<strong>04</strong><br />
(212) 509-3456<br />
SO ORDERED,<br />
WEITZ & LUXENBERG, P.C.<br />
700 Broadway<br />
D<br />
N0<strong>04</strong><strong>04</strong>78-1
I<br />
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK<br />
COUNTY OF NEW YORK<br />
EDWARD R. SKELLEY and BARBARA J.<br />
SKELLEY,<br />
A.C. & S., INC., et al.,<br />
Plaintiff( s),<br />
-against-<br />
Defendants.<br />
______________________________________II----~-----"---------*--_-<br />
X<br />
NYCAL<br />
I.A.S. Part 30<br />
: (Hon. Sherry Klein Heitler)<br />
: Index No(s).: <strong>11</strong>9379-00<br />
NO-OPPOSITION SUMMARY<br />
JUDGMENT MOTION AND<br />
: ORDER<br />
WHEREFORE, defendant CRANE CO. hereby requests summary judgment in the<br />
above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212, dismissing<br />
plaintiffs' complaint against defendant CRANE CO. with prejudice, and there being no<br />
opposition thereto,<br />
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against<br />
defendant CRANE CO. be, and the same are hereby, dismissed with prejudice and without costs.<br />
Dated: 3 \ 3 a\ \\<br />
New York, New York<br />
P<br />
WEITZ & LUXENBERG, P.CT<br />
K&L ATESLLP<br />
Attorneys for Plaintiff(s)<br />
Att eys for Defendant<br />
700 Broadway<br />
CRANE CO.<br />
New York, NY 10003<br />
599 Lexington Avenue<br />
(212) 558-5500 New York, NY 10022<br />
SO ORDERED,<br />
Hon. Sherry Klein Heitler<br />
APl? 15 20<strong>11</strong>
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YON<br />
-_. COUNTY OF NEW YORK - -<br />
IN RE: NEW YORK COUNTY<br />
i NYCA1,<br />
ASBESTOS LITIGATION j I.A.S. Part 30<br />
j (Heitler, 1.)<br />
THIS DOCTJMENT REFERS TO:<br />
EDWARD R. SKELLEY AND BARBARA J.<br />
SKELLEY,<br />
-against-<br />
Plaintiffs,<br />
i NO OPPOSITION<br />
i SUMMARY JUDGMENT<br />
MOTION AND ORDER<br />
i<br />
A. C. & S., NC., et al.,<br />
Defendants.<br />
j<br />
WHEREFORE, defendant, Treadwell Corporation, hereby requests summary judgment in<br />
the above entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules § 3212, dismissing plaintiffs’<br />
complaint against defendant, Treadwell Corporation, with prejudice in this action, and there<br />
being no opposition thereto,<br />
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against<br />
defendant, Treadwell Corporation, be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and<br />
without costs.<br />
Dated: New York, New York<br />
Treadwell Corporation<br />
MCGIVNEY & KLUGER, P.C.<br />
80 Broad Street-Suite 2300<br />
New York, New York 100<strong>04</strong><br />
(212) 509-3456<br />
SO ORDEED,<br />
N0<strong>04</strong><strong>04</strong>78-1<br />
EdwardR. Skelley and Barbara J. Skeiley<br />
WEITZ & LUXENBERG, P.C.<br />
700 Broadway F\b<br />
New York, New York 30003<br />
APR 2 6 20<strong>11</strong><br />
APR 1520<strong>11</strong><br />
couNn<br />
1235-2334<br />
\\pVV VOW<br />
CLERKS OFFICE
SIJPEME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YOFX<br />
COUNTY OF NEW YO=<br />
IN RE: NEW YORK COUNTY<br />
! NYCAL<br />
ASBESTOS LITIGATION<br />
i I.A.S. Part 30<br />
j (Heitler, J.)<br />
’THIS DOCUMENT REFERS TO:<br />
ANTHONY MODAFFERI,<br />
-against-<br />
A. C. & S., INC., et al.,<br />
Plaintiffs, j NO OPPOSITION<br />
! SUMMARY JUDGMENT<br />
! MOTION AND 0RI)ER<br />
Defendants. \<br />
WHEREFORE, defendant, Treadwell Corporation, hereby requests summary judgment in<br />
the above entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice LAW<br />
and Rules 0 3212, dismissing plaintiffs’<br />
complaint against defendant, Treadwell Corporation, with prejudice in this action, and there<br />
being no opposition thereto,<br />
ORDERJD, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against<br />
defendant, Treadwell Corporation, be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and<br />
without costs.<br />
Dated: New York, New York<br />
V I ,20<strong>11</strong><br />
Carol M. Tempesta, Esq.<br />
Attorney for Defendant<br />
Treadwell Corporation<br />
MCGIVNEY & KLUGER, P.C.<br />
80 Broad Street-Suite 2300<br />
New York, New York IO00<br />
(212) 509-3456<br />
SO ORDERED,<br />
Anthony Modafferi<br />
WEITZ & LUXENBERG, P.C.<br />
700 Broadway<br />
APR T 6 2021<br />
1235-1455d ki’L’ yc:JRf<br />
’ WERK‘S OFFICE<br />
N0<strong>04</strong><strong>04</strong>78-1
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YON<br />
COUNTY OF NEW YORK<br />
IN RE: NEW Y0R.K COIJNTY<br />
i<br />
ASBESTOS LITIGATION<br />
wis D~CUMENT REFERS TO:<br />
NYCAL<br />
j I.A.S. Part 30<br />
j (Heitler, 3.)<br />
CLARA M. LIGAMMARE, INDIVIDUALLY<br />
AND AS EXECUTRIX FOR THE ESTATE OF<br />
LAWRENCE LIGAMMARE,<br />
-against-<br />
Plaintiffs,<br />
j<br />
i NO OPPOSITION<br />
j SUMMARY JUDGMENT<br />
i MOTION AND OIU)ER<br />
A. C. & S., INC., et al.,<br />
Defendants.<br />
WHEREFORE, defendant, Treadwell Corporation, hereby requests summary judgment in<br />
the above entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules 5 3212, dismissing plaintiffs'<br />
complaint against defendant, Treadwell Corporation, with prejudice in this action, and there<br />
being no opposition thereto,<br />
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against<br />
defendant, Treadwell Corporation, be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and<br />
without costs.<br />
Carol M. Tempesta, Esq.<br />
Attorney for Defendant<br />
Treadwell Corporation<br />
MCGIWY & KLUGER, P.C.<br />
80 Broad Street-Suite 2300<br />
New York, New York 100<strong>04</strong><br />
(212) 509-3456<br />
SO ORDERED,<br />
Estate of Lawrence Liga<br />
700 Broadway<br />
New York, New York 10003<br />
&PR 2 6 Nil<br />
(212) 558-5500<br />
YORK<br />
OFWE<br />
pK's
NYCAL<br />
I.A.S. Part 30<br />
Hon. Sherry Klein Heitler, J.S.C.<br />
FRANK LUIS1 and HELEN LUISI,<br />
<strong>11</strong>9382-2000<br />
Plaintiffs,<br />
-against-<br />
A.O. SMITH WATER PRODUCTS, et al. including,<br />
FOSTER WHEELER CORPORATION,<br />
NO OPPOSITION SUMMARY JUDGMENT<br />
MOTION AND ORDER<br />
Defendants.<br />
WHEREFORE, defendant FOSTER WHEELER, L.L.C. (sued herein as “FOSTER WHEELER<br />
CORPORATION”) hereby request summary judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil<br />
Practice Law and Rules Section 3212, dismissing plaintiffs’ complaint against defendant FOSTER<br />
WHEELER, L.L.C. with prejudice, and there being no opposition thereto,<br />
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against defendant<br />
FOSTER WHEELER, L.L.C. be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and without costs.<br />
Weitz & Luxenberg, P.C.<br />
Attorney for Plaintffs<br />
700 Broadway<br />
New York, New York<br />
SO ORDERED, -<br />
Sedgwick, Detert, Moran & Arnold, LLP<br />
Attorneys for Foster Wheeler, L. L.C.<br />
Three Gateway Center, 12‘h Floor<br />
Newark, NJ 07102<br />
p\LED<br />
APR 2 6 ZO’’<br />
NJ/34 I76Ovl
SIJPREME COUKT OF THE STATE OF NEW YOKK<br />
._ COUNTY OF NEW YORK<br />
IN RE: NEW Y ON COUNTY<br />
ASBESTOS LITIGATION<br />
~-<br />
1’HIS DOCUMENT REFERS TO:<br />
ANN LATTANZIO, INDIVIDUALLY AND AS<br />
PERSONAL REPRESENTATIVE FOR THE<br />
ESTATE OF GIOVANNI LATTANZIO,<br />
-against-<br />
A. C. & S., NC., et a].,<br />
Plaintiffs,<br />
Defendants.<br />
NYCAL<br />
I.A.S. Part 30<br />
(Heitler, J.)<br />
GG2<br />
Index No . 1 1 9383/00 102<strong>26</strong>9/01,<br />
NO OPPOSITION<br />
SUMMARY JUDGMENT<br />
MOTION AND 0-ER<br />
WHEREFORE, defendant, Treadwell Corporation, hereby requests summary judgment in<br />
the above entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules $ 3212, dismissing plaintiffs’<br />
complaint against defendant, Treadwell Corporation, with prejudice in this action, and there<br />
being no opposition thereto,<br />
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against<br />
defendant, Treadwell Corporation, be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and<br />
without costs.<br />
Dated: New York New York<br />
q/1 ’ ,20<strong>11</strong><br />
WAmL<br />
b<br />
Carol M. Ternpesta,bq.<br />
Attorney for Defendant<br />
Treadwell corporation<br />
MCGlVNEY & KLUGER, P.C.<br />
80 Broad Street-Suite 2300<br />
New York, New York 100<strong>04</strong><br />
(212) 509-3456<br />
WEITZ & LUXENBERG, P.<br />
700 Broadway<br />
rk, New York 10003<br />
kpir ‘i‘ 6 21TT1<br />
SO ORDERED, Pi’’ ‘; ’kr2y
ASBESTOS LITIGATION i I.A.S. Part 30<br />
_" j (Heitler, J.)<br />
THIS IIOCIJMENTEFERS TO:<br />
ANN LATTANZIO, INDIVIDUALLY AND AS<br />
PERSONAL REPRESENTATIVE FOR TI 1E<br />
ESTATE OF GIOVANNI LATTANZIO,<br />
-against-<br />
A. C. & S., INC7 et al.,<br />
_- Defendants. i<br />
\<br />
G<br />
Index No.. 19383/00 02<strong>26</strong>9/01,<br />
i<br />
i NO OPPOSITlON<br />
Plaintiffs, \ SUMMARY JUDGMENT<br />
f MOTION AND ORDER<br />
WHEREFORE, defendant, Oakfabco, Inc., hereby requests summary judgment in the<br />
above entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules 5 3212, dismissing plaintiffs'<br />
complaint against defendant, Oakfabco, lnc., wtth prejudice in this action, and there being no<br />
opposition thereto,<br />
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against<br />
defendant, Oakfabco, Inc., be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and without<br />
costs.<br />
Dated: New York, New York<br />
cl( ,201 1<br />
by=ld GL,<br />
2 \-<br />
Robert Darish, Esq.<br />
Attorney for Defendant<br />
Oakfabco, lnc.<br />
MCGIVNEY & KLUGER, P.C.<br />
SO Broad Street-Suite 2300<br />
New York, New York 10-<br />
I<br />
700 Broadway 20<strong>11</strong><br />
New York, New York 10003 APf? 2 6
SIJPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK<br />
COUNTY OF NEW YORK<br />
IN RE: NEW YORK COUNTY j NYCAL<br />
ASHESTOS LITIGATION<br />
j I.A.S. Part 30<br />
- j (Heitler, J.)<br />
'l'HJS DOCUMEfiT-REFERS TO -<br />
CARL KROGER AND CAROL ANN KROGER,<br />
A. C. & S., INC., et al.,<br />
j Index No.: <strong>11</strong>9383/00<br />
i<br />
Plaintiffs, i NO OPPOSITION<br />
i SUMMARY JUDGMENT<br />
-against- j MOTION AND ORDER<br />
Defendants.<br />
WHEREFORE, defendant, Safeguard Industrial Equipment Co., hereby requests<br />
summary judgment in the above entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules § 3212,<br />
dismissing plaintiffs' complaint against defendant, Safeguard Industrial Equipment Co., with<br />
prejudice in this action, and there being no opposition thereto,<br />
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against<br />
defendant, Safeguard Industrial Equipment Co., be and the same are hereby dismissed with<br />
prejudice and without costs.<br />
Matthew T. Fairley, Esq.<br />
Attorney for Defendant<br />
Safeguard Industrial Equipment Co.<br />
MCGIVNEY & KLUGER, P.C.<br />
80 Broad Street-Suite 2300<br />
New York, New York 100<strong>04</strong><br />
(212) 509-3456<br />
SO OWERED,<br />
&-& - (-**<br />
&.<br />
++<br />
?<br />
=.*.&<br />
i> A<br />
Le"*' 9,<br />
\,<br />
rCY*."C<br />
-4 b. O*z, bt&. ...,-T<br />
Attorney for Plaintiffs 1:<br />
Carl Kroger and Carol Ann K<br />
WEITZ & LUXENBERG, P.C.<br />
700 Broadway<br />
New York, New York 10003<br />
(212) 558-5500<br />
APR 2 6 20<strong>11</strong><br />
NEW YOWK<br />
3G-wp<br />
CLERK'S OFFICE'<br />
N0<strong>04</strong><strong>04</strong>78-1
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK<br />
COUNTY OF NEW YORK<br />
IN RE: NEW YORK CITY ASBESTOS LITIGATION<br />
CARL KROGER and CAROL ANN KROGER,<br />
Plaintiff(s j,<br />
-against-<br />
A.C. & S., INC., et al.,<br />
Defendants.<br />
NYCAL<br />
: I.A.S. Part 30<br />
(Hon. Sherry Klein Heitler)<br />
* Index No.: <strong>11</strong>9383-00<br />
: NO-OPPOSITION SUMMARY<br />
JUDGMENT MOTION AND<br />
ORDER<br />
___r__r_________________________________--------------~~---------<br />
X<br />
WHEREFORE, defendant CRANE CO. hereby requests summary judgment in the<br />
above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 32 12, dismissing<br />
plaintiffs' complaint against defendant CRANE CO. with prejudice, and there being no<br />
opposition thereto,<br />
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against<br />
defendant CRANE CO. be, and the same are hereby, dismissed with prejudice and without costs.<br />
Dated:<br />
3 \?Y o\\\,<br />
New York, New York<br />
Attorneys for Plaintiff(s)<br />
700 Broadway CRANE CO.<br />
New York, NY 10003<br />
599 Lexington Avenue<br />
(212) 558-5500<br />
New York, NY 10022<br />
-..-_^.<br />
(212) 536-3900<br />
p<br />
SO ORDERED,<br />
Hon. Sherry Klein Heitler
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK<br />
COIJNTY OF NEW YORK<br />
1N RE: NEW YORK COUNl'Y<br />
j NYCAL<br />
ASBESTOS J,XTIGATION<br />
i I.A.S. Part 30<br />
! (Heitler, 3.)<br />
THIS DOCUMENT REFERS To:<br />
i Index No.: <strong>11</strong>9383/00<br />
CARL KROGER AND CAROL ANN KROGER, i<br />
-.<br />
-against-<br />
Plaintiffs, / NO OPPOSITION<br />
SUMMARY JUDGMENT<br />
! MOTION AND ORDER<br />
A. C. & S., NC., et al.,<br />
Defendants.<br />
j<br />
WHEREFORE, defendant, Treadwell Corporation, hereby requests summary judgment in<br />
the above entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules § 3212, dismissing plaintiffs'<br />
complaint against defendant, Treadwell Corporation, with prejudice in this action, and there<br />
being no opposition thereto,<br />
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against<br />
defendant, Treadwell Corporation, be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and<br />
without costs.<br />
Dated: New York New York<br />
a//, ,20<strong>11</strong><br />
b E-*%, ,#<br />
WB<br />
Carol M. Tempesta, E&,<br />
Attorney for Defendant<br />
Treadwell Corporation<br />
McG~VNEY & KLUGER, P.C.<br />
80 Broad Street-Suite 2300<br />
New York, New York 100<strong>04</strong> York, New York 10003<br />
(212) 509-3456<br />
SO ORDERED,<br />
p@-uMA Jn- ow7<br />
Attorney for Plaintiffs<br />
Carl Kroger and Carol Ann Kroger<br />
WEITZ & LUXENBERG, P.C.<br />
700 Broadway F\LEQ<br />
j@R 2 6 m'<br />
N0<strong>04</strong><strong>04</strong>78-1
I Defendants.<br />
S‘CJPREME COUK’L’ OF ‘[TIE S’I’A‘I’E OF NEW Y ORK<br />
___-___ COUNTY OF _-__ NEW<br />
I.-I.<br />
YORK<br />
-+-<br />
IN RE: NEW YOKK COUNTY<br />
i NYCAL<br />
ASBESTOS LITIGATION<br />
- I-_--<br />
_-<br />
i I.A.S. Part 30<br />
! (Heitler, J.)<br />
I-<br />
THIS DOCU=~€;FERS TO:<br />
/ Index No.: <strong>11</strong>9383/00<br />
CARL KROGEIZ AND CAROL ANN KROGER, i<br />
-against-<br />
A. C. & S., INC., el a/+,<br />
Plaintiffs, i NO OPPOSITION<br />
SUMMARY JUDGMENT<br />
i MOTION AND ORDER<br />
!<br />
WI-IEREFORE, defendant, Oakfabco, Inc., hereby requests summary judgment in the<br />
above entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules<br />
3212, dismissing plaintiffs’<br />
complaint against defendant, Oakfabco, Inc., with prejudice in this action, and there being no<br />
opposition thereto,<br />
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against<br />
I<br />
defendant, Oakfabco, Inc., be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and without<br />
costs.<br />
Dated: New York, New York<br />
W[ ,20<strong>11</strong><br />
h\ -- u<br />
dosd Darish, Esq.<br />
Attorney for Defendant<br />
Oakfabco, Inc.<br />
MCGIVNEY & KLUGER, P.C.<br />
SO Broad Street-Suite 2300<br />
New York, New York 100<strong>04</strong><br />
(212) 509-3456<br />
SO ORDERED,<br />
ger and Carol Ann Krog<br />
WElTZ & LUXENBERG,<br />
700 Broadway<br />
New York, New York 10003<br />
FILED<br />
APR 2 6 20<strong>11</strong><br />
YORK<br />
COUNW 2571!d$~RKS<br />
N0<strong>04</strong><strong>04</strong>74-1<br />
hi ”,( 15 20<strong>11</strong><br />
l A
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK<br />
--- COUNTY<br />
- OF NEW YORK __.-<br />
IN RE: NEW YORK town<br />
i NYCAL<br />
ASBESTOS LITIGATION<br />
i I.A.S. Part 30<br />
.-- ! (Heitler, J.)<br />
THIS DOCUMENT REFERS TO:<br />
SALVATORE RANDAZZO AND RHODA<br />
RANDAZZO,<br />
\ NO OPPOSITION<br />
Plaintiffs, i SUMMARY JUDGMENT<br />
i MOTION AND ORDER<br />
-against-<br />
A. C. & S., TNC., et al.,<br />
Defendants.<br />
j<br />
WHEREFORE, defendant, Treadwell Corporation, hereby requests summ r: J<br />
dgment in<br />
the above entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules § 3212, dismissing plaintiffs'<br />
complaint against defendant, Treadwell Corporation, with prejudice in this action, and there<br />
being no opposition thereto,<br />
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against<br />
defendant, Treadwell Corporation, be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and<br />
without costs.<br />
d{ ,20<strong>11</strong><br />
*h-<br />
Dated: New Yo k, New York<br />
Carol M. Tempesta, Esq.<br />
Attorney for Defendant<br />
Treadwell Corporation<br />
MCGIVNEY & UUGER, P.C.<br />
80 Broad Street-Suite 2300<br />
New York, New York 100<strong>04</strong><br />
and Rhoda Rand<br />
700 Broadway<br />
New York, New York 10003<br />
(2 12) 509-3456 m l(212) 558-5500<br />
1 /I<br />
N0<strong>04</strong><strong>04</strong>78-1
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK<br />
COUNTY OF NEW YORK<br />
NYCAL<br />
I.A.S. Part 30<br />
Hon. Sherry Klein Heitler, J.S.C.<br />
LAWRENCE F. CAVES€ and ANNA CAVES€,<br />
-against-<br />
Plaintiffs,<br />
Index Na.: 1<br />
& 8 7 - 2 v<br />
NO OPPOSITION SUMMARY JUDGMENT<br />
MOTION AND ORDER<br />
AS. &S. INC., et al. including,<br />
FOSTER WHEELER CORPORATION,<br />
Defendants.<br />
WHEREFORE, defendant FOSTER WHEELER, L.L,C. (sued herein as "FOSTER WHEELER<br />
CORPORATION") hereby request summary judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil<br />
Practice Law and Rules Section 3212, dismissing plaintiffs' complaint against defendant FOSTER<br />
WHEELER, L.L.C. with prejudice, and there being no opposition thereto,<br />
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against defendant<br />
FOSTER WHEELER, L.L.C. be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and without costs.<br />
k<br />
Dated: New York New York<br />
Dennis E. Vega, Esq.<br />
Sedgwick, Detert, Moran & Arnold, LLP<br />
Attorney for Plaintiffs<br />
Attorneys for Foster Wheeler, L. L. C.<br />
700 Broadway<br />
Three Gateway Center, 12fh Floor<br />
New York, New York 100 wark, NJ 07102 FltED<br />
SO ORDERED, APR 2 6 20<strong>11</strong><br />
NEW YORK<br />
COUNTY CLERK'S OFFIG<br />
NJ/34 1 736v 1
_IL<br />
SUPREME CO'CJR1' OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK<br />
COUNTY OF NEW YORK<br />
-<br />
IN RE: NEW YORK COUN'TY<br />
i NYCAL<br />
AS BEST0 S LITIGATION<br />
j 1.A.S. Part 30<br />
THlS DOCUMENT REFERS TO:<br />
I<br />
ANNA E. RLENKENSOPP, INDIVIDUA1,LY<br />
AND PERSONAL REPRESENTATIVE FOR<br />
THE ESTATE OF DAVID BLENKENSOPP,<br />
Plaintiffs,<br />
i NO OPPOSITlON<br />
i SUMMARY JUDGMENT<br />
! MOTION AND ORDER<br />
-against-<br />
A. C. & S., INC., et a/.,<br />
---<br />
Defendants.<br />
j<br />
WHEREFORE, defendant, Courter & Company, Inc., hereby requests summary<br />
judgment in the above entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules 5 3212, dismissing<br />
plaintiffs' complaint against defendant, Courter & Company, Inc., with prejudice in this action,<br />
and there being no opposition thereto,<br />
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against<br />
defendant, Courter & Company, Inc., be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and<br />
without costs.<br />
Attorney for Defendant<br />
Courter & Company, Inc.<br />
MCGIVNEY & KLUGE& P.C.<br />
80 Broad Street-Suite 2300<br />
New York, New York 100<strong>04</strong><br />
(2 12) 509-3456<br />
SO ORDERED,<br />
Estate of David Blenkensopp<br />
WEITZ & LUXENBERG, P.C.<br />
700 Broadway<br />
New York, New York 10003 FILED<br />
2 6 20<strong>11</strong><br />
N0<strong>04</strong><strong>04</strong>78-1
c_ -<br />
~<br />
SIJPREME couw OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK<br />
ASBESTOS LlTIGATION i I.A.S. Part 30<br />
j (Heitler? J.)<br />
THIS DOCUMENT REFERS TO: n<br />
Index F; <strong>11</strong>9388/~633/07<br />
ANNA E. BLENKENSOPP, INDIVIDUALLY<br />
AND PERSONAL REPFESENTATIVE FOR<br />
THE ESTATE OF DAVID BLENKENSQPP, NO OPPOSITION<br />
SUMMARY JUDGMENT<br />
Plaintiffs, MOTION AND ORDER<br />
-against-<br />
A. C. & S., TNC., et a/.,<br />
Defendants.<br />
WHEREFORE, defendant, Patterson Pump Co., hereby requests summary judgment in<br />
the above entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules 5 32 12, dismissing plaintiffs'<br />
complaint against defendant, Patterson Pump Co., with prejudice in this action, and there being<br />
no opposition thereto,<br />
ORDERED, that upan notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against<br />
defendant, Patterson Pump Co,, be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and without<br />
costs.<br />
Attorney for Defendant<br />
Patterson Pump Co.<br />
MCGWY & UUGER, P.C.<br />
80 Broad Street-Suite 2300<br />
New York, New York 100<strong>04</strong><br />
(212) 509-3456<br />
SO ORDERED,<br />
Attorney for Plaintiffs<br />
Estate of David Blenkensop<br />
WElTZ & LUXENBERG, P.C.<br />
700 Broadwav<br />
NK h' YORK<br />
COUNTY CLERK'S OFFICE'<br />
454-9039<br />
I<br />
N0<strong>04</strong><strong>04</strong>7S- 1
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK<br />
COUNTY OF NEW YORK<br />
__<br />
IN RE: NEW YORK COUNTY<br />
: NYCAL<br />
ASBESTOS LITIGATION<br />
i I.A.S. Part 30<br />
-.- ___ _-_.X7-_I -A-<br />
'rm DOCUMENX-FERS<br />
TO:<br />
ANNA E. BLENKENSOPP, INDIVIDUA1,LY<br />
i<br />
AND PERSONAL REPRESENTATIVE FOR<br />
j<br />
THE ESTATE OF DAVID BLENKENSOPP,<br />
[ NO OPPOSITION<br />
j SUMMARY JUDGMENT<br />
Plaintiffs, \ MOTION AND ORDER<br />
-against-<br />
A. C. & S., INC., et al.,<br />
Defendants.<br />
i<br />
WHEFEFORE, defendant, Safeguard Industrial Equipment Co., hereby requests<br />
summary judgment in the above entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules 6 3212,<br />
dismissing plaintiffs' complaint against defendant, Safeguard Industrial Equipment Co., with<br />
prejudice in this action, and there being no opposition thereto,<br />
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against<br />
defendant, Safeguard Industrial Equipment Co., be and the same are hereby dismissed with<br />
prejudice and without costs.<br />
Safeguard Industrial Equipment Co.<br />
MCGIVNEY & KLUGER, P.C.<br />
80 Broad Street-Suite 2300<br />
New York, New York 100<strong>04</strong><br />
(212) 509-3456<br />
SO ORDERED,<br />
1 L"E D<br />
Attorney for Plaintiffs<br />
Estate of David Blenkensopp<br />
WEITZ & LUXENBERG, P.C.<br />
700 Broadway<br />
New York 10003 kt?R 2 '6 20<strong>11</strong><br />
NEW YORK<br />
CLERK'S OFFIE]<br />
324-5661A<br />
N0<strong>04</strong><strong>04</strong>78-1
SUPREME COURT OF THE sxrE OF NEW YORK<br />
__ COUNTY OF NEW YORK<br />
IN FCE: NEW Y ~RK CO~JNTY i NYCAL<br />
ASBESTOS LITIGATION<br />
j I.A.S. Part 30<br />
-<br />
i (Heitler, J.)<br />
THIS DOCUMENT REFERS TO:<br />
0<br />
i Index 0.: <strong>11</strong>9388/00 <strong>04</strong>633/07<br />
ANNA E. BLENKENSOPP, INDIVIDUALLY !<br />
AND PERSONAL REPRESENTATIVE FOR<br />
THE ESTATE OF DAVID BLENKENSOPP, NO OPPOSITION<br />
i SUMMARY JUDGMENT<br />
Plaintiffs, i MOTION AND ORDER<br />
-against-<br />
A. C. & S., INC., et al.,<br />
Defendants. ;<br />
WHEREFORE, defendant, Tishman Liquidating Corp., hereby requests summary<br />
judgment in the above entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Q 3212, dismissing<br />
plaintiffs' complaint against defendant, 'Tishman Liquidating Corp., with prejudice in this action,<br />
and there being no opposition thereto,<br />
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against<br />
defendant, Tishman Liquidating Corp., be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and<br />
without costs.<br />
Dated: New York. New York<br />
F e y for DeffnJant<br />
ishman Liquida g Corp.<br />
MCGIVNEY & KLUGER, P.C.<br />
Estate df David Blenkenso<br />
WEITZ & LUXENBERG, P.C.<br />
80 Broad Street-Suite 2300 700 Broadway<br />
New York, New York 100<strong>04</strong> New York, New York 10003 ,#q 2 6 20<strong>11</strong><br />
(212) 509-3456 (212].558-5500<br />
SO ORDERED,<br />
nirw "QRK<br />
W&'N CLERKS QFF~CE'<br />
Hon. Sherry Klein Heitler 2383-22469 27650<br />
N0<strong>04</strong><strong>04</strong>78-1<br />
APR 15 2071
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK<br />
COUNTY OF NEW YORK<br />
ANNA E. BLENKENSOPP, as Personal * ~ L I X Y ~ A T<br />
1Y Y LAL<br />
Representative for the Estate of DAVID<br />
* I.A.S. Part 30<br />
BLENKENSOPP and ANNA E. BLENKENSOPP, : Shew Klein Heitler)<br />
Individually,<br />
: Index No.: <strong>11</strong>9388-00<br />
Plainti ff(s),<br />
A.C. & S., TNC., et al.,<br />
-against-<br />
: NO-OPPOSITION SUMMARY<br />
: JUDGMENT MOTION AND<br />
: ORDER<br />
WHEREFORE, defendant CRANE CO. hereby requests summary judgment in the<br />
above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 32 12, dismissing<br />
plaintiffs complaint against defendant CRANE CO. with prejudice, and there being no<br />
opposition thereto,<br />
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against<br />
defendant CRANE CO. be, and the same are hereby, dismissed with prejudice and without costs,<br />
Dated: 3 \ 3 O\ [\<br />
New York, New York<br />
Attorneys for Plaintiff(s) APR 2 6 20<strong>11</strong><br />
700 Broadway CRANE CO.<br />
New York, NY 10003 599 Lexington Avenue NEW YORK<br />
(212) 558-5500 New York, NY lOOij!$~r\rr( CLERKS OFFICE<br />
SO ORDERED,<br />
Won. Sheny Klein Heitler<br />
APK 15 20<strong>11</strong>
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YOKK<br />
COUNTY OF NEW YORK ~-<br />
IN RE: NEW FORK COUNTY-<br />
j NYCML<br />
ASBESTOS LI'I'IGATION<br />
j I.A.S. Part 30<br />
! (Heitler, J.)<br />
THIS DOCUMENT REFERS TO:<br />
e<br />
j Index N .: <strong>11</strong>9390/00 5<strong>26</strong>8/00<br />
BETTY BISHOP, INDIVIDUALLY AND<br />
EXECUTRIX FOR THE ESTATE OF ROBERT j<br />
D. BISHOP, SR., NO OPPOSITION<br />
j SUMMARY JUDGMENT<br />
Plaintiffs, i MOTION AND ORDER<br />
-against-<br />
A. C. & S., INC, et al.,<br />
Defendants. :<br />
WHEREFORE, defendant, Treadwell Corporation, hereby requests summary judgment in<br />
the above entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules $ 3212, dismissing plaintiffs'<br />
complaint against defendant, Treadwell Corporation, with prejudice in this action, and there<br />
being no opposition thereto,<br />
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against<br />
defendant, Treadwell Corporation, be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and<br />
without costs.<br />
Dated: New ork, New York<br />
20<strong>11</strong><br />
L%\*<br />
Carol M. Tempesta, Esq.<br />
Attorney for Defendant<br />
Treadwell Corporation<br />
I D<br />
MCGIVNEY & KLUGER, P.C.<br />
WElTZ & LUXENBERG, P.C.<br />
80 Broad Street-Suite 2300<br />
700 Broadway ~pFi 2 6 2Ol1<br />
New York, New York 100<strong>04</strong><br />
New York, New Y ork 10003<br />
(212) 509-3456 (212) 558-5500<br />
pJE.bq YORK<br />
SO ORDERED,<br />
CLEWS oFF\Cf<br />
Y 7, )<br />
couNn<br />
123520654<br />
NOW<strong>04</strong>78- 1<br />
APR I5 20<strong>11</strong>
_I<br />
SIJPREME COURT OF TIE STATE OF NEW YORK<br />
COUNTY OF NEW YORK -<br />
IN KE: NEW YORK cowry<br />
: NYCAL,<br />
ASRESTOS LITIGATION<br />
j I.A.S. Part 30<br />
-<br />
! (Heitler, J.)<br />
THIS DOCUMENT KEFERS TO:<br />
---- j Index 0.: <strong>11</strong>4390/0 25<strong>26</strong>8/00<br />
BETTY BISHOP, INDIVIDUALLY AND<br />
EXECUTRIX FOR THE ESTATE OF ROBERT I<br />
D. BISHOP, SR., NO OPPOSITION<br />
i SUMMARY JUDGMENT<br />
Plaintiffs, ; MOTION AND OWER<br />
-against-<br />
A. C. & S., NC., et al.,<br />
Defendants. 1<br />
WHEREFORE, defendant, Patterson Pump Co., hereby requests summary judgment in<br />
the above entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules 5 3212, dismissing plaintiffs'<br />
complaint against defendant, Patterson Pump Co., with prejudice in this action, and there being<br />
no opposition thereto,<br />
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against<br />
defendant, Patterson Pump Co., be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and without<br />
costs.<br />
Patterson Pump Co.<br />
MCGlVNEY & KLUGER, P.C.<br />
80 Broad Street-Suite 2300<br />
Estate of Robert D. Bishop, Sr.<br />
WEITZ & LUXENBERG, P.<br />
700 Broadway<br />
N0<strong>04</strong><strong>04</strong>78-1
- _-__--- __-- --------<br />
-- / Index 0.: <strong>11</strong>9390/0 , 125<strong>26</strong>8/00<br />
SlJPREME COURT OF THP: STATE OF NEW YORK<br />
COUNTY OF NEW YORK<br />
IN W,: NEW YORK COUNTY<br />
j NYCAL<br />
ASBESTOS LTTlGATJON<br />
i I.A.S. Part 30<br />
j (Heitler, J.)<br />
._I_I-<br />
T’H 1s DOClJMENT REFERS TO:<br />
BETTY BISHOP, ~DIVIDUA1,LY AND<br />
EXECUTRIX FOR THE ESTATE OF ROBERT i<br />
D. BISHOP, SR., NO OPPOSITION<br />
i SUMMARY JUDGMENT<br />
Plaintiffs, j MOTION AND ORDER<br />
-against-<br />
A. C. & S., INC., el al.,<br />
Defendants.<br />
j<br />
WHEREFORE, defendant, Safeguard Industrial Equipment Co., hereby requests<br />
summary judgment in the above entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules 4 3212,<br />
dismissing plaintiffs’ complaint against defendant, Safeguard lndustrial Equipment Co., with<br />
prejudice in this action, and there being no opposition thereto,<br />
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against<br />
defendant, Safeguard Industrial Equipment Co., be and the same are hereby dismissed with<br />
prejudice and without casts.<br />
Dated: New YQrk, New York<br />
Attorney for Defendant<br />
Safeguard Industrial Equipment Co.<br />
MCG~VNEY & KLUGER, P.C.<br />
80 Broad Street-Suite 2300<br />
New York, New York 100<strong>04</strong><br />
(212) 509-3456<br />
Estate of Robert D. Bishop, Sr.<br />
WEITZ & LUXENBERG,<br />
SO ORDERED,<br />
N0<strong>04</strong><strong>04</strong>78-1<br />
APR 15 20<strong>11</strong>
I<br />
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK<br />
COUNTY OF NEW YORK<br />
IN RE: NEW YOU COUNTY<br />
j NYCAL<br />
, ASBESTOS LITIGATION<br />
j I.A.S. Part 30<br />
-.<br />
! (Heitler, J.)<br />
THIS DOCUMENT REFERS TO:<br />
i Index Np%a5<strong>26</strong>8100<br />
BETTY BISHOP, INDIVIDUALLY AND<br />
EXECUTRIX FOR THE ESTATE OF ROBERT j<br />
D. BISHOP, SR.,<br />
i NO OPPOSITION<br />
i SUMMARY JUDGMENT<br />
Plaintiffs, MOTION AND ORDER<br />
-against-<br />
A. C. & S., INC., et al.,<br />
Defendants.<br />
j<br />
WHEREFORJZ, defendant, Tishman Liquidating Cop, hereby requests summary<br />
judgment in the above entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules 5 3212, dismissing<br />
plaintiffs' complaint against defendant, Tishman Liquidating Cop, with prejudice in this action,<br />
and there being no opposition thereto,<br />
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against<br />
defendant, Tishman Liquidating Corp., be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and<br />
without costs.<br />
80 Broad Street-Suite 2300<br />
New Y ork, New Y ork 100<strong>04</strong><br />
(212) 509-3456<br />
SO ORDERED,<br />
Hon. Shew Klein Heitler<br />
WElTZ & LUXENBERG, P.C.<br />
700 Broadway<br />
p ~YW YORK<br />
COUNTY CLERKS OFFICE<br />
2383-22475AR<br />
N0<strong>04</strong><strong>04</strong>78-1
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK<br />
COUNTY OF NEW YORK<br />
IN RE: NEW YORK CITY ASBESTOS LITIGATION<br />
* NYCAL<br />
BETTY ANN BISHOP, Individually and as Executrix :<br />
Part<br />
for the Estate of ROBERT D. BISHOP SR.,<br />
3o<br />
: (Hon. Sherry Klein Heitler)<br />
Plaintiff(s),<br />
: Index No,: <strong>11</strong>9390-00<br />
A.C. & S., INC., et al.,<br />
-against-<br />
Defendants.<br />
NO-OPPOSITION SUMMARY<br />
: JUDGMENT MOTION AND<br />
: ORDER<br />
WHEREFORE, defendant CRANE CO. hereby requests summary judgment in the<br />
above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 32 12, dismissing<br />
plaintiffs complaint against defendant CRANE CO. with prejudice, and there being no<br />
opposition thereto,<br />
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against<br />
defendant CRANE CO. be, and the same are hereby, dismissed with prejudice and without costs.<br />
Dated: 3 \T a\ \\<br />
rk, New York<br />
-P-l 72<br />
Frank Ortiz, Esq.<br />
WEITZ & LUXENBERG, n.'<br />
Attorneys for Plaintiff(s)<br />
700 Broadway<br />
New York, NY 10003<br />
(212) 558-5500 New York, NY 10022~~<br />
IQj'<br />
-,<br />
Hon. Shf?yMn Heitler
"---"*---->-- ~<br />
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK<br />
COUNTY OF NEW YOKK<br />
IN RE: NEW YORK COUNTY<br />
j NYCAL<br />
ASBESTOS LITIGATION<br />
j I.A.S. Part 30<br />
: (Heitler, J.)<br />
THIS DOCUMENT REFERS TO:<br />
j Index No.: <strong>11</strong>939YOO<br />
GRACE FOWLER, INDIVIDUALLY AND AS !<br />
EXGCU'T'KIX FOR THE ESTATE OF JOHN T. j<br />
FOWLER,<br />
i NO OPPOSITION<br />
j SUMMARY JUDGMENT<br />
Plaintiffs, j MOTION AND ORDER<br />
-against-<br />
A. C. & S., INC., et ai.,<br />
Defendants.<br />
WHEREFORE, defendant, Safeguard Industrial Equipment Co., hereby requests<br />
summary judgment in the above entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules 0 3212,<br />
dismissing plaintiffs' complaint against defendant, Safeguard Industrial Equipment Co., with<br />
prejudice in this action, and there being no opposition thereto,<br />
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against<br />
defendant, Safeguard Industrial Equipment Co., be and the same are hereby dismissed with<br />
prejudice and without costs.<br />
Dated: New Yo&, New York<br />
.b*L<br />
Attorney for Defendant<br />
Safeguard Industrial Equipment<br />
MCGIVNEY & KLUGER, P.C.<br />
SO Broad Street-Suite 2300<br />
New York, New York 100<strong>04</strong><br />
(212) 509-3456<br />
r-c 'cs<br />
Attorney for Plaintiffs<br />
Estate of John T. Fowler<br />
WEITZ & LUXENBERG, P.<br />
York, New York ]@&ha hp~ 2 6 IM'<br />
New 700 Broadway<br />
(212) 558-5500<br />
SO ORDERED,<br />
Won. Sheny Kleinkeitler<br />
N0<strong>04</strong><strong>04</strong>78-1
SIJPREME c:Ic)uKr OF u-iE STATE OF NEW Y ORK<br />
I:OUN'I'Y OF NEW YORK<br />
1N RE: NJ:W YOKK COUN'I'Y<br />
AS €3 f
I__<br />
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK<br />
COUNTY OF NEW YORK<br />
IN RE: NEW YORK COUNTY<br />
j NYCAL<br />
ASBESTOS LITIGATION<br />
i I.A.S. Part 30<br />
d i (Heitler, J.)<br />
THIS DOCUMENT REFERS TO:<br />
Index No.: <strong>11</strong>9393/00<br />
TN RE FOWLER: GRACE FOWLER,<br />
INDIVIDUALLY AND AS EXECUTRIX FOR<br />
THE ESTATE OF JOHN T. FOWLER,<br />
NO OPPOSITION<br />
SUMMARY JUDGMENT<br />
Plaintiff’s, MOTION AND ORDER<br />
---.__I<br />
-against-<br />
A. C. & S., INC., et al.,<br />
- Defendants. j<br />
WHEREFORE, defendant, Treadwell Corporation, hereby requests summary judgment in<br />
the above entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules fj 3212, dismissing plaintiffs’<br />
complaint against defendant, Treadwell Corporation, with prejudice in this action, and there<br />
being no opposition thereto,<br />
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against<br />
defendant, Treadwell Corporation, be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and<br />
without costs.<br />
Dated: New Y rk, New York<br />
49, , 201 1<br />
Attorney for Defendant<br />
Treadwell Corporation<br />
MCGIVNEY & UUGER, P.C.<br />
80 Broad Street-Suite 2300<br />
New York, New York I00<strong>04</strong><br />
(212) 509-3456<br />
SO ORDERED,<br />
Estate of John T. Fowler<br />
WEITZ & LUXENBERG, P.C.<br />
700 Broadway<br />
New York, New York 10003<br />
(212) 558-5500<br />
323&W<br />
~p~3 2 6 20.<strong>11</strong><br />
pjE\N Y GffK<br />
CLERKS OFFICE
-.-I<br />
I<br />
SUPREME COURT OF THE STAI’E OF NEW YORK<br />
COUNTY<br />
~ OF NEW YORK ~<br />
IN RE: NEW YORK COUNTY<br />
! NYCAL<br />
ASBESTOS LlT1C;ATION<br />
--<br />
THlS DOCUMENT FEFERS TO:<br />
DAVID 1. GIANCARLO AND NOREEN K.<br />
GIANCARLO,<br />
-against-<br />
A. C. & S., INC., et al.,<br />
Plaintiffs,<br />
- Defendants. !<br />
j J.A.S. Part 30<br />
i (Heitler, J.)<br />
i Index No.-0725/01<br />
: NO OPPOSITION<br />
! SUMMARY JUDGMENT<br />
j MOTION AND ORDER<br />
WHEREFORE, defendant, Oakfabco, Inc., hereby requests summary judgment in the<br />
above entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules 9 3212, dismissing plaintiffs’<br />
complaint against defendant, Oakfabco, Inc., with prejudice in this action, and there being no<br />
opposition thereto,<br />
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against<br />
defendant, Oakfabco, Inc., be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and without<br />
costs.<br />
Dated: New York, New York<br />
4 I ,20<strong>11</strong><br />
,I*<br />
Robert Darish, Esq.<br />
Attorney for Defendant<br />
Oakfabco, Inc.<br />
MCGIVNEY & KLUGER, P.C.<br />
80 Broad Street-Suite 2300<br />
New York, New York 100<strong>04</strong><br />
(212) 509-3456<br />
SO ORDERED,<br />
r<br />
I L E D<br />
David J: Giancarlo and Noreen K. Giancarlo<br />
WEITZ&LUXENBERG,P.CF<br />
700 Broadway<br />
New Y ork, New Y ork 10003 APR 2 6 20<strong>11</strong><br />
C<br />
N0<strong>04</strong><strong>04</strong>74-1.
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK<br />
COUNTY OF NEW YORK<br />
IN RE: NEW YORK CITY<br />
ASBESTOS LITIGATION<br />
This Document Relates to:<br />
DAVID J. GIANCARLO and NOREEN K.<br />
GIANCARLO,<br />
I.A.S. Part 30<br />
(Heitler, J.)<br />
INDEX NO.: 00-1 19393<br />
NO OPPOSITION<br />
SUMMARY JUDGMENT<br />
MOTION AND ORDER<br />
against<br />
ACandS, INC., at al.,<br />
WHEREFORE, defendant, Kohler Co., hereby<br />
quests summary judgm nt in th<br />
above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212, dismissing plaintiffs'<br />
complaint against defendant, Kohler Co., with prejudice, and there being no opposition thereto,<br />
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against<br />
defendant, Kohler Co., be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and without costs.<br />
DATED:<br />
New Brunswick, NJ<br />
3 \n \\\<br />
IUNST & DOUKAS, LLP<br />
4ttorneys for Defendant,<br />
"I_______-"<br />
SlJPRHME COUR1' OF THE STATE OF NI?W YORK<br />
COUNTY OF NEW YOKK -<br />
IN RE: NEW YORK COUNTY<br />
j NYCAL<br />
ASBESTOS LITIGATION I.A.S. Part 30<br />
- i (Heitler, J.)<br />
THIS DOCUM-REFEKS TO:<br />
GRACE FOWLER, INDIVIDUALLY AND AS<br />
EXECU'I'RIX FOR 'THE ESTATE OF JOHN T.<br />
FOWLER,<br />
-against-<br />
A. C. & S., JNC., et al.,<br />
Plaintiffs,<br />
Defendants.<br />
j Index No.: <strong>11</strong>9393/00<br />
i<br />
j<br />
NO OPPOSITION<br />
j SUMMARY JUDGMENT<br />
: MOTION AND ORDER<br />
WHEREFORE, defendant, Tishman Liquidating Corp., hereby requests summary<br />
judgment in the above entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules 8 321 2, dismissing<br />
plaintiffs' complaint against defendant, Tishman Liquidating Corp., with prejudice in this action,<br />
and there being no opposition thereto,<br />
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against<br />
defendant, Tishman Liquidating Corp., be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and<br />
without costs.<br />
Dated: New Yo&, New York<br />
MCGJVNEY & KLUGER, P.C.<br />
80 Broad Street-Suite 2300<br />
New York, New Y ork 100<strong>04</strong><br />
(2 12) 509-3456<br />
SO ORDERED,<br />
Estate of John T. Fowler<br />
WEITZ & LUXENBERG. P.C.<br />
700 Broadway<br />
York, New York 10003<br />
APR 2 6 lo''<br />
couNn<br />
2383-22470K<br />
NEW YORK<br />
CLERKS of<br />
N0<strong>04</strong><strong>04</strong>78-1<br />
APR I5 20<strong>11</strong>
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK<br />
_-_ COUNTY _ _ _ OF . . NEW ~ _ Y_ ON ____.-----<br />
> ~<br />
1N RE: NEW YORK COUNTY<br />
i NYCAL<br />
ASBESTOS LITIGATION<br />
-~~<br />
THIS DOCUMENT REFERS TO:<br />
HARVEY L. FLETTMAN AND VIVIAN M.<br />
FLEI'TMAN,<br />
-against-<br />
A. C. & $., INC., st al.,<br />
Plaintiffs,<br />
Defendants.<br />
i I.A.S. Part 30<br />
! (Heitler, J.)<br />
1 h d e x ~ ~ & 0 5 8 8 / 0 1<br />
i<br />
NO OPPOSITION<br />
i SUMMARY JUDGMENT<br />
MOTION AND ORDER<br />
WHEREFORE, defendant, Treadwell Corporation, hereby requests summary judgment in<br />
the above entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules 8 3212, dismissing plaintiffs'<br />
complaint against defendant, Treadwell Corporation, with prejudice in this action, and there<br />
being no opposition thereto,<br />
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against<br />
defendant, Treadwell Corporation, be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and<br />
without costs.<br />
Dated: New Yo&, New York<br />
-1/ \ , 20<strong>11</strong><br />
.&\4i&LqZz><br />
Carol M. Tempesta, Esq.<br />
Attorney for Defendant<br />
Treadwell Corporation<br />
Harvey L. Fleitman and Vivian M. Fleitman<br />
MCGXVNEY & KLUGER, P.C.<br />
WEITZ & LUXENBERG, P.C.<br />
SO Broad Street-Suite 2300<br />
700 Broadway<br />
New York, New York 100<strong>04</strong><br />
New York, New York 10003<br />
(212) 509-3456 (212) 558-5500<br />
APR 2 6 20<strong>11</strong><br />
SO ORDERED,<br />
Y^<br />
1235-19822<br />
COLlNfl<br />
CLERK'S OFF=<br />
N0<strong>04</strong><strong>04</strong>78-1<br />
APR I5 20<strong>11</strong>
-I-_-<br />
SUPREME COUR'T OF 'THE STATE OF NEW YORK<br />
COUNTY OF NEW YORK<br />
1N RE: NEW YORK COUNTY<br />
! NYCAL<br />
ASBESTOS LITIGATION<br />
; I.A.S. Part 30<br />
i<br />
1<br />
(Ikitler, J.)<br />
THIS DOCUMENT REFERS TO:<br />
Index No&~&00588/01<br />
IIARVEY L. FLEITMAN AND VIVIAN M.<br />
FLEITMAN,<br />
i NO OPPOSITION<br />
Plaintiffs, j SUMMARY JUDGMENT<br />
MOTION AND ORDER<br />
-against-<br />
A. C. & S., INC., et al.,<br />
Defendants.<br />
j<br />
WHEREFORF:, defendant, Oakfabco, Inc., hereby requests summary judgment in the<br />
above entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules 5 3212, dismissing plaintiffs'<br />
complaint against defendant, Oakfabco, Inc,, with prejudice in this action, and there being no<br />
opposition thereto,<br />
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against<br />
defendant, Oakfabco, Inc., be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and without<br />
costs.<br />
Dated: New York, New York<br />
, 201 1<br />
D<br />
Attorney for Defendant<br />
F'[*rx<br />
Oakfabco, Inc.<br />
Harvey L. Fleitman and Vivi<br />
MCGIVNEY & KLUGER, P.C.<br />
WE~TZ & LUXENBERG, P.C.<br />
80 Broad Street-Suite 2300<br />
700 Broadway<br />
New York, New Y ork 100<strong>04</strong><br />
New York, New York 10003<br />
(212) 509-3456 (212) 558-5500 APR 2 6 20<strong>11</strong><br />
SO ORDERED,<br />
NEW YORK<br />
2mt&jI' C W S OFFICE<br />
N0<strong>04</strong><strong>04</strong>74-1
.-_ I .-I_.-<br />
ASBESTOS 1,ITlGATION<br />
I<br />
DOCUMENT JXEFERS TO:<br />
THIS<br />
-_d<br />
HARVEY L. FLEITMAN AND VIVIAN M.<br />
FLEITMAN,<br />
-against-<br />
A. C. & S., INC., et al.,<br />
-__---<br />
j 1.A.S. Part 30<br />
i (fkitler, J.)<br />
Index ~ ~ 0 0 5 8 * , 0 I<br />
[ NO OYPOSITlON<br />
Plaintiffs, I SUMMARY JUDGMENT<br />
\ MOTION AND ORJlER<br />
Defendants. -- i<br />
WHEWFORE, defendant, Safeguard Industrial Equipment Co., hereby requests<br />
summary judgment in the above entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules 5 3212,<br />
dismissing plaintiffs' complaint against defendant, Safeguard Industrial Equipment Co., with<br />
prejudice in this action, and there being no opposition thereto,<br />
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against<br />
defendant, Safeguard Industrial Equipment Co., be and the same are hereby dismissed with<br />
prejudice and without costs.<br />
irea: i ~tw<br />
NeW Y OTK<br />
torney for Defendant<br />
feguard Industrial Equipment<br />
MCGIVNEY & KLUGER, P.C.<br />
Harvey L. Fleitrnan and Vivian M. Fleitman<br />
WHTZ & LUXENBERG, P.C.<br />
SO Broad Street-Suite 2300 700 Broadway e rb '><br />
New York, New York 100<strong>04</strong><br />
(212) 509-3456<br />
New York, New York 1<br />
(212) 558-5500<br />
N0<strong>04</strong><strong>04</strong>78-1
SIJPREME COURT OF ’THE STATE OF NEW YORK<br />
COUNTY OF NEW YORK<br />
INET’NIiW YORK COUNTY<br />
! NYCAL<br />
ASBESTOS LITIGATION j I.A.S. Part 30<br />
-- -<br />
! (Heitler, J.)<br />
THIS DOCUME~EFERS TO:<br />
JOSE F. FERNANDEZ AND ARLENE<br />
FERNANDEZ,<br />
[ NO OPPOSITION<br />
Plaintiffs, i SUMMARY JUDGMENT<br />
\ MOTION AND 0RI)ER<br />
-against-<br />
A. C. & S., INC., etal.,<br />
_ - . ~<br />
Defendants.<br />
i<br />
WHEREFORE, defendant, Courter & Company, Inc., hereby requests summary<br />
judgment in the above entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules 0 32 12, dismissing<br />
plaintiffs’ complaint against defendant, Courter & Company, Inc., with prejudice in this action,<br />
and there being no opposition thereto,<br />
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against<br />
defendant, Courter & Company, Inc., be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and<br />
without costs.<br />
Courter & Company, Inc.<br />
Jose F. Fernandez and Arlene Fernandez<br />
MCGIWY & KLUGER, P.C.<br />
WEITZ & LUXENBERG, P.C.<br />
80 Broad Street-Suite 2300<br />
700 Broadway<br />
New York. New York 100<strong>04</strong><br />
New York, New York 1000<br />
(212) 509-3456 (2 12) 558-5500<br />
SO ORDERED,<br />
Hon. Sherry Klein?Heftler<br />
---_._<br />
N0<strong>04</strong><strong>04</strong>78-1
-_----__I<br />
~~ ____.__I.-___<br />
_ _ ~ . I --A ”<br />
SZJI’KI7,Mk COUR‘I’ OF TJJE STATE OF NEW YORK<br />
COUNTY OF NEW YORK<br />
JN RE: NEW YORK cou;”\Jm<br />
LI_^<br />
! NYCAL<br />
ASHESTOS I,ITIGATION<br />
THlS DOCUMENT REFERS TO:<br />
JOSE F. FERNANDEZ AND ARLENE<br />
FERNANDEZ,<br />
-against-<br />
A. C. & S., @-IC., et ul.,<br />
; I.A.S. Part 30<br />
I (Heitler, J.)<br />
i Index N o m I 00621 l0 1<br />
i NO OPPOSITION<br />
Plaintiffs, i SUMMARY JUDGMENT<br />
\ MOTION AND ORDER<br />
Defendants. - i<br />
I<br />
WHEREFORE, defendant, Patterson Pump Co., hereby requests summary judgment in<br />
the above entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules 9 3212, dismissing plaintiffs’<br />
complaint against defendant, Patterson Pump Co., with prejudice in this action, and there being<br />
no opposition thereto,<br />
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against<br />
defendant, Patterson Pump Co., be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and without<br />
costs.<br />
Patterson Pump Co.<br />
Jose F. Fernandez and Arlene Fernandez<br />
MCG~VNEY & KLUGER, P.C.<br />
WE~TZ & LUXENBERG, P.C.<br />
80 Broad Street-Suite 2300<br />
700 Broadway<br />
New York, New York 100<strong>04</strong><br />
New York, New York loop<br />
(2 12) 509-3456<br />
Y<br />
(212) 558-5500<br />
SO ORDERED,<br />
Hon. Sherry Klein Heitler<br />
E’D<br />
/$pR it 6 le‘‘<br />
N0<strong>04</strong><strong>04</strong>78- I<br />
APR 15 20<strong>11</strong><br />
i<br />
I
SlJPKEME COURT OF ?'HE STATE OF NEW YORK<br />
COUNTY OF NEW _-_-<br />
IN RE NEW YOM corm-ry-<br />
~ YORK<br />
_.Ij<br />
NYCAL<br />
ASBESTOS LITIGATION<br />
j I.A.S. Part 30<br />
THIS DOCUMEN'I' REFERS TO:<br />
HARVEY L. FLEITMAN AND VIVIAN M.<br />
FLEITMAN,<br />
\ NO OPPOSITION<br />
Plaintiffs, i SUMMARY JUDGMENT<br />
i MOTION AND ORDER<br />
-against-<br />
A. C. & S., INC., et al.,<br />
Defendants.<br />
i<br />
WHEREFORE, defendant, Courter & Company, Inc., hereby requests summary<br />
judgment in the above entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules 5 3212, dismissing<br />
plaintiffs' complaint against defendant, Courter & Company, Inc., with prejudice in this action,<br />
and there being no opposition thereto,<br />
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against<br />
defendant, Courter & Company, Inc., be and the sme are hereby dismissed with prejudice and<br />
without costs.<br />
Attorney for Defendant<br />
Courter & Company, Inc.<br />
MCGlVNEY & KLUGER, P.C.<br />
80 Broad Street-Suite 2300<br />
WEITZ & LUXENBERG, P.C.<br />
700 Broadway<br />
New York, New York 100<strong>04</strong> New York, New York 10003<br />
(212) 509-3456 s 2 ) 558-5500<br />
SO ORDERED,<br />
Hon. Sherry Klein Heitler
SUPREME COURT OF THE S'I'ATE OFNEW YORK<br />
comv -- OF NEW YORK<br />
1N RE: NEW YORK COUNT<br />
: NYCAL<br />
ASBESTOS LITIGA'I'JON<br />
j I.A.S. Part 30<br />
! (Heitler, J.)<br />
THIS DOCUMENT REFERS E:<br />
a<br />
j XndexN .: <strong>11</strong>9394/0 005W01<br />
HARVEY L. FLEJTMAN AND VIVJAN M.<br />
FLEITMAN ,<br />
i NO OPPOSITION<br />
Plaintiffs, j SUMMARY JUDGMENT<br />
/ MOTION AND ORDER<br />
-against-<br />
A. C. & S., INC., et al., I<br />
Defendants.<br />
j<br />
WMEREFORE, defendant, Tishman Liquidating Corp., hereby requests summary<br />
judgment in the above entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules 4 3212, dismissing<br />
i<br />
plaintiffs' complaint against defendant, lishman Liquidating Corp., with prejudice in this action,<br />
and there being no opposition thereto,<br />
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against<br />
defendant, Tishman Liquidating Corp., be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and<br />
without costs.<br />
I<br />
MCGIVNEY & KLUGER, P.C.<br />
WEITZ & LUXENBERG, P.C.<br />
80 Broad Street-Suite 2300<br />
700 Broadway<br />
New Yak, New York 100<strong>04</strong><br />
New York, New York 10003<br />
(212) 509-3456 (212) 558-5500<br />
SO ORDERED,<br />
2383-22468U<br />
N0<strong>04</strong><strong>04</strong>78-1
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK<br />
COUNTY OF NEW YORK<br />
1N RE: NEW YORK COUNTY<br />
! NYCAL<br />
ASBESTOS LITlGATlON<br />
j I.A.S. Part 30<br />
i (Heitler, J.)<br />
THIS DOCUMENT REFERS TO:<br />
JOSE F. FERNANDEZ AND ARLENE<br />
FERNANDEZ,<br />
-against-<br />
P1 aint i ffs,<br />
! NO OPPOSITION<br />
i SUMMARY JUDGMENT<br />
1 MOTION AND OIRXIER<br />
A. C. & S., INC., etal.,<br />
Defendants.<br />
j<br />
WHEREFORE, defendant, Treadwell Corporation, hereby requests summary ddgment --I<br />
the above entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules 6 3212, dismissing plaintiffs'<br />
complaint against defendant, Treadwell Corporation, with prejudice in this action, and there<br />
being no opposition thereto,<br />
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against<br />
defendant, Treadwell Corporation, be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and<br />
without costs.<br />
Attorney for Defendant<br />
Treadwell Corporation<br />
MCGIW,Y & UUGER, P.C.<br />
80 Broad Street-Suite 2300<br />
700 Broadway<br />
New York. New York 100<strong>04</strong><br />
New York. New York 10003<br />
(212) 509-3456 (212) 558-5500 APR 2 6 20<strong>11</strong><br />
SO ORDERED,<br />
*<br />
NEW YC13K<br />
1ewBBTy CLERKS OFFICE<br />
N0<strong>04</strong><strong>04</strong>78-1
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK<br />
COUNTY OF NEW YORK<br />
IN RE: NEW YORK CITY<br />
ASBESTOS LIT1 GAT1 ON<br />
This Document Relates to:<br />
MARSHA A. KESSLER, Executrix For the Estate of<br />
TERRY M. KESSLER, and MARSHA A. KESSLER,<br />
Individually,<br />
I.A.S. Part 30<br />
(Heitler, J.)<br />
INDEX NO.: 00-1 19400<br />
NO OPPOSITION<br />
SUMMARY JUDGMENT<br />
MOTION AND ORDER<br />
against<br />
ACandS, INC., et at.,<br />
WHEREFORE, defendant, Kohler Co., hereby requests summary judgment in the<br />
above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212, dismissing plaintiffs'<br />
complaint against defendant, Kohler Co., with prejudice, and there being no opposition thereto,<br />
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against<br />
lefendant, Kohler Co., be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and without costs.<br />
DATED:<br />
New Brunswick, NJ<br />
IUNST &I DOUKAS, LLP<br />
4ttorneys for Defendant,<br />
{ohler Co.<br />
10 Paterson Street - PO Box 480<br />
qew Brunswick, New Jersey 08903<br />
Marsha A. Kessler, Executrix for the Estate of<br />
Terry M. Kessler, and Marsha A. Kessler,<br />
Individually<br />
700 Broadway<br />
HOAGLAND, LONQO<br />
MORAN. DUNST 8<br />
DOUKAS. LLP<br />
ATTORNEYS AT LAW<br />
NORTH JERSEY<br />
40 PATERSON ST<br />
PO BOX 480<br />
NNVBRUNSWICK. NJ<br />
$0 ORDERED:<br />
SOUTH JERSEY<br />
701 WLTSEY'S MILL RD<br />
SUITE 202<br />
HAMMONTON, NJ<br />
APR 2 6 20<strong>11</strong>
SI-JPREME COURT OF ‘THE STATE OF NEW YORK<br />
--- COUNTY OF NEW YORK<br />
IN RE: NEW YOFEc6N?Y<br />
j NYCAL<br />
ASBESTOS LITIGATION i I.A.S. Pa1 30<br />
! (Heitler, J.)<br />
THIS DOCUMENT REFERS pro:<br />
TERRY M. KESSLER AND MARSHA<br />
KESSLER,<br />
-against-<br />
PI ainti ffs, j NO OPPOSITION<br />
[ SUMMARY JUDGMENT<br />
! MOTION AND ORDER<br />
A. C. & S., INC., et al.,<br />
Defendants.<br />
j<br />
WHEREFORE, defendant, Tishman Liquidating Corp., hereby requests summary<br />
judgment in the above entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules 5 3212, dismissing<br />
plaintiffs’ complaint against defendant, Tishman Liquidating Corp., with prejudice in this action,<br />
and there being no opposition thereto,<br />
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against<br />
defendant, Tishman Liquidating Corp., be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and<br />
without costs.<br />
Tishman Liquidating Corp.<br />
MCGIVNEY & KLUGER, P.C.<br />
80 Broad Street-Suite 2300<br />
New York, New York IO<br />
(212) 509-3456<br />
SO ORDERED,<br />
WElTZ & LUXENBERG, P.C.<br />
700 Broadway<br />
&RJ 2 6 2Q1?<br />
EW YORK<br />
kERKS OFFICE<br />
N0<strong>04</strong><strong>04</strong>78-1
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YON<br />
COUNTY OF NEW YOKK<br />
IN E,: NEW YOK COUN‘I’Y<br />
: NYCAL<br />
ASBES’I’OS LITIGATION<br />
i I.A.S. Part 30<br />
i (Heitler, J.)<br />
THIS DOCUMENT REFERS TO:<br />
-^-_I-<br />
TERRY M. KESSLER AND MARSHA<br />
KESSLER,<br />
A. C. & S., INC., et al.,<br />
Index N ofiZGa0 1 89210 1,<br />
100787/03<br />
Plaintiffs, j NO OPPOSITION<br />
: SUMMARY JUDGMENT<br />
-against- i MOTION ANI) ORDER<br />
- Defendants. i<br />
WHEREFORE, defendant, Treadwell Corporation, hereby requests summary judgment in<br />
the above entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules 4 3212, dismissing plaintiffs’<br />
complaint against defendant, Treadwell Corporation, with prejudice in this action, and there<br />
being no opposition thereto,<br />
ORDEED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against<br />
defendant, Treadwell Corporation, be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and<br />
without costs.<br />
Dated: New York, New York<br />
Carol M. Tempesta, Esq.<br />
Attorney far Defendant<br />
Treadwell Corporation<br />
MCGIVNEY & UUGER, P.C.<br />
80 Broad Street-Suite 2300<br />
New York, New York 100<strong>04</strong><br />
700 Broadway<br />
New York, New York 10003<br />
(212) 509-3456 (212) 558-5500<br />
-.<br />
SO ORDERED,<br />
Hon. S%<br />
KXek Heitler
S~JPKEME couii'r 01: m~ STATE OF NEW YORK<br />
- C'OIJNTY ----. OF NEW YORK -_- -_--<br />
1N RE: NEW YOKK COUNTY i NYCAL<br />
ASBESTOS LI'I'IGATION<br />
i I.A.S. Part 30<br />
\ (Heitler, J.><br />
THIS DOCUMENT REFERS TO:<br />
TERRY M. KESSLER AND MARSHA<br />
KESSLEK,<br />
100787/03<br />
-against -<br />
Plaintiffs, j NO OPPOSITION<br />
i SUMMARY JUDGMENT<br />
i MOTION AND ORDER<br />
A. C. & S., INC., etal.,<br />
Defendants.<br />
j<br />
W€IEREFORE, defendant, Safeguard Industrial Equipment Co., hereby requests<br />
summary judgment in the above entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules 4 3212,<br />
dismissing plaintiffs' complaint against defendant, Safeguard Industrial Equipment Co., with<br />
prejudice in this action, and there being no opposition thereto,<br />
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against<br />
defendant, Safeguard lndustrial Equipment Co., be and the same are hereby dismissed with<br />
prejudice and without costs.<br />
Attornev for Defend<br />
Safeguard Industrial Equipment Co.<br />
Carl Kroget and Carol Ann Kroger<br />
MCGIVNEY & KLUGER, P.C.<br />
WEITZ & LUXENBERG, P.<br />
FILED<br />
80 Broad Street-Suite 2300<br />
700 Broadway<br />
New York, New York 100<strong>04</strong> New York, New York 100 3<br />
(212) 509-3456<br />
12) 558-5500<br />
SO ORDERED, __<br />
-<br />
Hon. Sherry Klein Heitler<br />
APR 2 6 20<strong>11</strong><br />
N0<strong>04</strong><strong>04</strong>78-1
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK<br />
COUNTY OF NEW YORK<br />
In Re: NEW YORK CITYASBESTOS LITIGATION<br />
Index No.: 120329/00<br />
DONALD VER HAGUE,<br />
- against -<br />
Plaintiff(s),<br />
NO OPPOSITION<br />
SUMMARY JUDGMENT<br />
MOTION<br />
AC and S, INC., (ARMSGTRONG<br />
CONTRACTING & SUPPLY) et al.,<br />
Defendants.<br />
WHEREFORE, Defendant ?VEIL-MCLAIN COMPANY, INC., hereinafter (“WEJL-<br />
MCLAIN”) hereby requests Summary Judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil<br />
Practice Law and Rules Section 321 2, dismissing plaintiff’s complaint against Defendant Weil-<br />
McLain with prejudice, and there being no opposition thereto,<br />
i<br />
I<br />
I<br />
I<br />
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against<br />
Defendant, Weil-McLain be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and without costs<br />
to either party.<br />
Dated: ,20<strong>11</strong><br />
Frank Ortiz, Esq.<br />
Attorneys for Plaintiff<br />
700 Broadway<br />
New York, NY 10003<br />
(212) 558-5500<br />
SO ORDERED,<br />
SEGAL McCAMBRIDGE<br />
SINGER & MAHONEY, LTD.<br />
Attorneys for Defendant<br />
Weil McLain<br />
850 Third Avenue, Suite <strong>11</strong>00<br />
FILED<br />
APR 2 6 201t<br />
NLUV YLIRK<br />
COUNTY CLERKS 0-<br />
15 20<strong>11</strong>
SlJYKEME COIJRI' OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK<br />
-COUNTY - . ~ - OF NEW YORK .-<br />
IN RE: NEW YORK COUNTY-<br />
\ NYCAL<br />
ASBESTOS LI'I'IGATION<br />
j I.A.S. Part 30<br />
i (Heitler, 3.)<br />
- I I . . ~ - -- ~<br />
THIS DOCTJMENT REFERS TO:<br />
j Index No.: 12<strong>11</strong>97/00<br />
BEVER1,Y J. BENNETT, PERSONAL<br />
REPRESENTATIVE FOR THE ESTATE OF<br />
RICHARD FLOYD BENNETT AND BEVERLY \ NO OPPOSITION<br />
.I. BENNETT, INDlVIDUALLY,<br />
! SUMMARY JUDGMENT<br />
i MOTION AND ORDER<br />
Plaintiffs,<br />
-against-<br />
A. C. & S., INC.? et al.,<br />
Defendants. !<br />
WHEREFORE, defendant, Ti shman Liquidating Corp., hereby requests summary<br />
judgment in the above entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules 6 3212, dismissing<br />
plaintiffs' complaint against defendant, Tishman Liquidating Corp., with prejudice in this action,<br />
and there being no opposition thereto,<br />
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against<br />
defendant, Tishman Liquidating Corp., be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and<br />
without costs.<br />
MCGIVNEY & KLUGER, P.C.<br />
80 Broad Street-Suite 2300<br />
New York, New York 100<strong>04</strong><br />
(212) 509-3456<br />
SO ORDERED,<br />
N0<strong>04</strong><strong>04</strong>78-1<br />
Estate of Richard Floyd Bennett<br />
WEITZ & LUXENBERG, P.C.<br />
700 Broadway<br />
New York, New York 10003<br />
2383-4147<br />
p y :PI1<br />
I
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK<br />
COUNTY OF NEW YORK<br />
IN RE: NEWFORK COUNTY<br />
! NYCAL<br />
ASBESTOS LITIGATION<br />
j I.A.S. Part 30<br />
j (Heitler, J.><br />
-<br />
THIS DOCUMENT REFEKS ~ 6:<br />
BEVERLY J. BENNETT, PERSONAL<br />
REPRESENTATIVE FOR THE ESTATE OF<br />
RICHAm FLOYD BENNETT AND BEVERLY<br />
J. BENNETT, INDIVIDUALLY,<br />
Plaintiffs,<br />
i Index No.: 12<strong>11</strong>97/00<br />
NO OPPOSITION<br />
j SUMMARY JUDGMENT<br />
i MOTION AND ORJIEK<br />
-against-<br />
A. C. & S., INC., et a).,<br />
Defendants.<br />
i<br />
WHEREFORE, defendant, Courter & Company, Inc., hereby requests summary<br />
judgment in the above entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules 5 3212, dismissing<br />
plaintiffs' complaint against defendant, Courter & Company, Inc., with prejudice in this action,<br />
and there being no opposition thereto,<br />
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against<br />
defendant, Courter & Company, Inc., be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and<br />
without costs.<br />
Attorney for Defendant<br />
Courter & Company, 1nc.<br />
MCG~VNEY & KLUGER, P.C.<br />
80 Broad Street-Suite 2300<br />
New York. New York 100<strong>04</strong><br />
Estate of Richard Floyd Benne<br />
WElTZ & LUXENBERG, P.C.<br />
700 Broadway<br />
New Y ork. New York 10003<br />
N0<strong>04</strong><strong>04</strong>78-1
~ - I .<br />
I .I-<br />
SUPKEME C:OURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YON<br />
-_- COUNTY OF NEW YORK<br />
.-<br />
1N RE: NEW YOKK COUNTY<br />
i NYCAL<br />
ASBESTOS LlTlGATION<br />
I.A.S. Part 30<br />
(Heitler, J .)<br />
THIS DOCUMENT REFERS TO:<br />
Index No.: 121 '197/00<br />
BEVERLY J. BENNETT, PERSONAL<br />
REPRESENTATIVE FOR THE ESTATE OF<br />
RJCHARD FIBYD BENNETT AND BEVERLY NO OPPOSITION<br />
J . BENNETT, INDIVIDUALLY,<br />
SUMMARY JUDGMENT<br />
MOTION AND ORDER<br />
Plaintiffs,<br />
-against-<br />
A. C. & S., INC., et al.,<br />
--<br />
Defendants.<br />
WHEREFORE, defendant, Treadwell Corporation, hereby requests summary judgment in<br />
the above entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules 5 3212, dismissing plaintiffs'<br />
complaint against defendant, Treadwell Corporation, with prejudice in this action, and there<br />
being no opposition thereto,<br />
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against<br />
defendant, Treadwell Corporation, be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and<br />
without costs.<br />
Dated: New Y rk, New York<br />
4 ?, ,20<strong>11</strong><br />
L d I i Q ,-%<br />
Carol M. Tempesta, hsq.<br />
Attorney for Defendant<br />
Treadwell Corporation<br />
Estate of Richard Floyd Bennett<br />
MCGNNEY & KLUGER, P.C.<br />
WEITZ & LUXENBERG, P.C.<br />
80 Broad Street-Suite 2300 700 Broadway APK 2 %0<strong>11</strong><br />
New York, New York 100<strong>04</strong><br />
ew York 10003<br />
(212) 509-3456 00 NCUir" "'OHki<br />
SO ORDERED,<br />
COUN~ CLERK'S OFFICE<br />
1235-8763<br />
N0<strong>04</strong><strong>04</strong>78-1<br />
APR 15 20<strong>11</strong>
SUPREME COURT OF TIHE STATE OF NEW YORK<br />
ASBESTOS LITIGATION i I.A.S. Part 30<br />
! (Heitler, 1.)<br />
THIS DOCGMENT REFERS TO:<br />
j Index No. 1 12<strong>11</strong>97/00<br />
BEVERLY J. BENNETT, PERSONAL<br />
KEPRESENTATIVE FOR THE ESTATE OF<br />
RICHARD FLOYD BENNETT AND BEVERLY NO OPPOSITION<br />
J. BENNETT, INDIVIDUALLY,<br />
t SUMMARY JUDGMENT<br />
i MOTlON AND ORDER<br />
Plaintiffs,<br />
- -d<br />
-against-<br />
A. C. & S., INC., et al.,<br />
Defendants.<br />
WHEREFORE, defendant, Safeguard Industrial Equipment Co., hereby requests<br />
summary judgment in the above entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules 5 3212,<br />
dismissing plaintiffs’ complaint against defendant, Safeguard Industrial Equipment Co., with<br />
prejudice in this action, and there being no opposition thereto,<br />
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against<br />
defendant, Safeguard Industrial Equipment Go., be and the same are hereby dismissed with<br />
prejudice and without costs.<br />
Dated: New Yojk, New York<br />
I*.<br />
Attorney for Defendant Attorney for Plaintiffs -. “3 -7-<br />
Safeguard Industrial Equipment Co.<br />
MCGIVNEY & KLUGER, P.C.<br />
Estate of Richard Floy&\e~<br />
WElTZ & LUXENBERG, P.C.<br />
80 Broad Street-Suite 2300 700 Broadway p~ 2 6<br />
New York, New York 100<strong>04</strong><br />
ew Y ork 1 OOd<br />
(212) 509-3456 00<br />
SO ORDERED,<br />
324-5613<br />
N0<strong>04</strong><strong>04</strong>78-1
CHARLES 1. HENRY and MARILYN HENRY,<br />
-against-<br />
Plaintiffs,<br />
NYCAL<br />
I.A.S. Part 30<br />
Hon. Sherry Klein Heitler, J.S.C.<br />
Index No.: r??<br />
21309-200<br />
NO OPPOSITION SUMMARY JUDGMENT<br />
MOTION AND ORDER<br />
A.C. &S. INC., et al. including,<br />
FOSTER WHEELER CORPORATION,<br />
WHEREFORE, defendant FOSTER WHEELER, L.L.C. (sued herein as "FOSTER WHEELER<br />
CORPORATION") hereby request summary judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil<br />
Practice Law and Rules Section 3212, dismissing plaintiffs' complaint against defendant FOSTER<br />
WHEELER, L.L.C. with prejudice, and there being no opposition thereto,<br />
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against defendant<br />
FOSTER WHEELER, L.L.C. be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and without costs.<br />
Weitz & Luxenberg, P.C.<br />
Attorney for Plain tvfs<br />
700 Broadway<br />
New York, New York 10003<br />
Attorneys for Foster Wheeler, L. L.C.<br />
Three Gateway Center, 12fh Floor<br />
Newark, NJ 07102<br />
SO ORDERED,<br />
APR 2 6 20<strong>11</strong><br />
NEW YORK<br />
COUNTY CLERKS OFFICE'<br />
NJ<strong>04</strong>1752vl
I_<br />
I<br />
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK<br />
COUNTY OF NEW YORK<br />
IN RE: NEW YORK COUNTY<br />
i NYCAL<br />
ASBESTOS LITIGATION<br />
I I.A.S. Part 30<br />
i (Heitler, J.)<br />
THIS DOCUMENT REFERS TO:<br />
Index No.: 121686/00<br />
ANTONINO SCLAFANI AND ROSARIA<br />
SCLAFANI,<br />
NO OPPOSITION<br />
Plaintiffs, SUMMARY JUDGMENT<br />
MOTION AND ORDER<br />
-against-<br />
--<br />
A. C. & S., INC, et al.,<br />
Defendants.<br />
i<br />
WHEREFORE, defendant, Safeguard Industrial Equipment eo., hereby requests<br />
summary judgment in the above entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules 6 3212,<br />
dismissing plaintiffs' complaint against defendant, Safeguard Industrial Equipment Co,, with<br />
prejudice in this action, and there being no opposition thereta,<br />
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against<br />
defendant, Safeguard Industrial Equipment Co,, be and the same are herepd<br />
px"<br />
prejudice and without costs.<br />
b p 2 ~ 6 201'<br />
Dated: New Yo k, New York<br />
Jfl ,20<strong>11</strong><br />
/ ---<br />
Safeguard Industrial Equipment Co.<br />
MCGIVNEY & KLUGER, P.C.<br />
80 Broad Street-Suite 2300<br />
New York, New York 100<strong>04</strong><br />
(212) 509-3456<br />
Attorney for Plaintiffs<br />
Antonino Sclafani and Rosaria Sclafani<br />
WEIT2 & LUXENBERG, P.C.<br />
700 Broadway<br />
New York, New York 10003<br />
SO ORDERED,<br />
Hon.hhikry Klein Heitler 324-5782<br />
N0<strong>04</strong><strong>04</strong>78-1
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK<br />
COUNTY OF NEW YORK<br />
IN RE: NEi"Y5RK COUNTY i NYCAL<br />
ASBESTOS LITIGATION<br />
j X.A.S. Part 30<br />
---- [ (Heitlcr, J.)<br />
THIS DOCUMENT KEFERS TO:<br />
i Index No.: 121686/00<br />
ANTONINO SCLAFANI AND ROSAKIA<br />
SCLAFANI,<br />
/ NO OPPOSITION<br />
-against-<br />
A, (:. & S., INC., et ul.,<br />
Plaintiffs,<br />
! SUMMARY JUDGMENT<br />
MOTION AND ORDER<br />
i<br />
Defendants.<br />
j<br />
WHEREFORE, defendant, Treadwell Corporation, hereby requests summary judgment in<br />
the above entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules tj 3212, dismissing plaintiffs'<br />
complaint against defendant, Treadwell Corporation, with prejudice in this action, and there<br />
being no opposition thereto,<br />
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against<br />
defendant, Treadwell Corporation, be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and<br />
without costs.<br />
Dated: New Yo k, New York<br />
.(! ,20<strong>11</strong><br />
\<br />
Michele J. Mittleman, Esq.<br />
Attorney for Defendant<br />
Treadwell Corporation<br />
MCGIWY & KLUGER, P.C.<br />
SO Broad Street-Suite 2300<br />
New Yoxk, New York 100<strong>04</strong><br />
(212) 509-3456<br />
SO ORDERED,<br />
Antonino Sclafani and Rosaria Sclafani<br />
W~rrz & LUXENBERG, P.C.<br />
700 Broadway<br />
New York, New York 10003<br />
APR 2 6 '"'<br />
YUBK<br />
12351052 c~~nKs<br />
COUNfl<br />
N0<strong>04</strong><strong>04</strong>7X-I
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATJ: OF NEW YORK<br />
-_ COUNTY OF NEW YORK<br />
IN RE: NEWYXK COUNTY<br />
i NYCAL<br />
ASBESTOS LITIGATION<br />
j I.A.S. Part 30<br />
I<br />
i (Heitler, J.)<br />
THIS DOCUMENT REFERS TO:<br />
j Index No.: 122053/00<br />
SUZANNE MCINERNEY, INDIVIDUALLY<br />
AND AS EXECUTRIX FOR THE ESTATE OF<br />
I<br />
JOSEPH JOHN MCINERNEY,<br />
i NO OPPOSITION<br />
i SUMMARY JUDGMENT<br />
Plaintiffs, i MOTION AND ORDER<br />
-against-<br />
A. C:. & S., INC., et al.,<br />
--<br />
Defendants.<br />
WHEREFORE, defendant, Oakfabco, Inc., hereby requests summary judgment in the<br />
above entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules 8 3212, dismissing plaintiffs’<br />
complaint against defendant, Oakfabco, lnc., with prejudice in this action, and there being no<br />
opposition thereto,<br />
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against<br />
defendant, Oakfabco, Inc., be and the same are hereby dismissed with<br />
costs.<br />
Dated: New York, New York<br />
Robert P ,\ 3<br />
)JfOll<br />
Darish, Esq.<br />
Attorney for Defendant<br />
Oakfabco, Inc.<br />
MCGIVNEY & UUGER, P.C.<br />
80 Broad Street-Suite 2300<br />
New York, New York 100<strong>04</strong><br />
(212) 509-3456<br />
Estate if Joseph John McInerney<br />
WEITZ & LUXENBERG, P.C.<br />
700 Broadway<br />
New York, New York 10003<br />
SO ORDERED,<br />
2571 -755<br />
N0<strong>04</strong><strong>04</strong>74- I
"-_I_-<br />
I<br />
I<br />
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK<br />
COUNTY OF NEW YORK<br />
IN RE: NEW YORK COUNTY<br />
j NYCAT,<br />
ASBESTOS LI'TIGA'ITION i I.A.S. Part 30<br />
-<br />
i (Heitler, J.)<br />
-,<br />
THIS DOCUMENT REFERS TO-?<br />
i Index No.: 122053/00<br />
SUZANNE MCINERNEY? INDIVIDUALLY<br />
i<br />
AND AS EXECUTRIX FOR 'THE ESTATE OF i<br />
JOSEPH JOHN MCINERNEY,<br />
! NO OPPOSITION<br />
j SUMMARY JUDGMENT<br />
Plaintiffs, MOTION AND ORDER<br />
-against-<br />
A. C. & S., INC., et al.,<br />
Defendants.<br />
i<br />
WHEREFORE, defendant, Treadwell Corporation, hereby requests summary judgment in<br />
the above entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules 0 3212, dismissing plaintiffs'<br />
complaint against defendant, Treadwell Corporation, with prejudice in this action, and there<br />
being no opposition thereto,<br />
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against<br />
defendant, Treadwell Corporation, be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and<br />
without costs.<br />
Dated: New Yprk, New York<br />
A<br />
Carol M. Tempesta, Esq:<br />
Attorney for Defendant<br />
Treadwell Corporation<br />
MCGNNEY & KLUGER, P.C.<br />
80 Broad Street-Suite 2300<br />
WEITZ & LUXENBERG, P.C.<br />
700 Broadway APR 2 6 20<strong>11</strong><br />
New York, New York 100<strong>04</strong><br />
New York, New York 10003<br />
(212) 509-3456<br />
(212) 558-5500<br />
SO ORDERED,<br />
D<br />
NEW YOKK<br />
COUNTY CLERKS OFFICE<br />
1235-21397
I<br />
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK<br />
". comn OF NEW YORK -<br />
IN RE: NEW YORK COUNTY<br />
! NYCAL<br />
ASBESTOS LlTlGATION<br />
i I.A.S. Part 30<br />
(Heitler, J.)<br />
THIS DOCUMENT REFERS TO:<br />
Index No.: 122496/00<br />
PATRICIA A. RUSSELL, INDIVIDUALLY AND<br />
AS ADMINISTRATRIX FOR THE ESTATE OF<br />
THOMAS E. RUSSELL,<br />
NO OPPOSITION<br />
SUMMARY JUDGMENT<br />
Plaintiffs, MOTION AND ORDER<br />
-against-<br />
A. C. & S., INC., et ai.,<br />
Defendants.<br />
i<br />
WHEREFORE, defendant, Treadwell Corporation, hereby requests summary judgment in<br />
the above entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules 5 3212, dismissing plaintiffs'<br />
complaint against defendant, Treadwell Corporation, with prejudice in this action, and there<br />
being no opposition thereto,<br />
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against<br />
defendant, Treadwell Corporation, be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and<br />
without costs.<br />
Dated: New York, New York<br />
4<strong>11</strong> ,201 1<br />
P-P-FJLf&<br />
Carol M. Ternpesta, Esq.<br />
Attorney for Defendant<br />
Treadwell Corporation<br />
MCGIVNEY & KIJGER, P.C.<br />
80 Broad Street-Suite 2300 700 Broadway<br />
New York, New York 100<strong>04</strong> NewYork,NewYork10003 APR 6 2031<br />
(212) 509-3456<br />
SO ORDERED,<br />
GW-%V4<br />
I*dfW YORK<br />
CLERKS OFFIE
~ IN<br />
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK<br />
comw OF NEW YORK<br />
RE: NEW YORK COUNTY i NYCAL<br />
ASBESTOS LITIGATION<br />
i I.A.S. Part 30<br />
i (Heitler, J.)<br />
THIS DOCUMENT REFERS TO:<br />
Index No.: 122496/00<br />
PATRICIA A. RUSSELL, INDIVIDUALLY AND<br />
AS ADMINISTRATRIX FOR THE ESTATE OF<br />
THOMAS E. RUSSELL,<br />
i NO OPPOSITION<br />
i SUMMARY JUDGMENT<br />
Plaintiffs,<br />
j MOTION AND ORDER<br />
-against -<br />
A. C. & S., NC., et al.,<br />
Defendants.<br />
j<br />
WHEREFORE, defendant, Safeguard Industrial Equipment Co., hereby requests<br />
summary judgment in the above entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules (5 3212,<br />
dismissing plaintiffs' complaint against defendant, Safeguard Industrial Equipment Co., with<br />
prejudice in this action, and there being no opposition thereto,<br />
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against<br />
defendant, Safeguard Industrial Equipment Co., be and the same are hereby dismissed with<br />
prejudice and without costs.<br />
p""<br />
h- &z, k$.<br />
Attorney for Plaintiffs<br />
Estate of Thomas E. Russ<br />
MCGIVNEY & KLUGER, P.C.<br />
WELT2 & LUXENBERG, P.C.<br />
80 Broad Street-Suite 2300<br />
700 Broadway<br />
New York, New York 100<strong>04</strong> New York, New York 10003<br />
APR 2 6 20<strong>11</strong><br />
(212) 509-3456<br />
(212) 558-5500<br />
SO ORDERED,<br />
Hon. Sherry Klein Heitler<br />
%&i#iY<br />
e-.,<br />
P4E-W VOW<br />
CLERK'S OFFICE'
-I_-<br />
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YOKK<br />
-- cowry<br />
IN RE: NEFYORK<br />
~ OF NEW YORK<br />
COUNTY<br />
: NYCAL<br />
ASBESTOS LITIGATION<br />
i I.A.S. Part 30<br />
1 (Heitler, J.)<br />
THIS DOCUMENT REFERS TO:<br />
j Index No.: 122496/00<br />
PATRICIA A. RUSSELL, INDIVIDUALLY AND i<br />
AS ADMINISTRATRIX FOR THE ESTATE OF j<br />
THOMAS E. RUSSELL, i NO OPPOSITION<br />
j SUMMARY JUDGMENT<br />
Plaintiffs, i MOTION AND ORDER<br />
-against-<br />
A. C. & S., NC., et al.,<br />
Defendants.<br />
WHEREFORE, defendant, Oakfabco, Inc., hereby requests summary judgment in the<br />
above entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules 4 3212, dismissing plaintiffs'<br />
complaint against defendant, Oakfabco, Inc., with prejudice in this action, and there being no<br />
opposition thereto,<br />
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against<br />
defendant, Oakfabco, Inc., be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and without<br />
costs.<br />
Dated: New York, New York<br />
Robert Darish, Esq.<br />
Attorney for Defendant<br />
Oakfabco, Inc.<br />
MCG~VNEY & UUCER, P.C.<br />
80 Broad Street-Suite 2300<br />
New York, New York 100<strong>04</strong><br />
(212) 509-3456<br />
SO ORDERED,<br />
WEITZ & LUXENBERG, P.C.<br />
700 Broadway<br />
ork,NewYork 10003 AkH 2 6 20<strong>11</strong><br />
t (' 4, \'
__ COUNTY OF NEW YORK<br />
IN RE: NEW YORK COIJNTY<br />
ASBESTOS LITIGATION<br />
-- ---<br />
THIS DOCUMENT REFERS TO:<br />
ANNA MULDER, INDIVIDUALLY AND AS<br />
ADMINISTRATRIX FOR THE ESTATE OF<br />
MAURITS C. MULDER,<br />
Plaintiffs,<br />
i NYCAL<br />
; ].AX Part 30<br />
i (JIeitler, J.)<br />
Index No.: 123057/00<br />
i<br />
; NO OPPOSITION<br />
i SUMMARY JUDGMENT<br />
MOTION AND OKDER<br />
-against-<br />
A. C. & S., MC., et d.,<br />
Defendants.<br />
j<br />
WEIEWFORE, defendant, Oakfabco, Inc., hereby requests summary judgment in the<br />
above entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Q 3212, dismissing plaintiffs'<br />
complaint against defendant, Oakfabco, lnc., with prejudice in this action, and there being no<br />
opposition thereto,<br />
OKDERED, that upon notic,e to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against<br />
defendant, Oakfabco, Inc., be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and without<br />
costs.<br />
Attorney for Defendant<br />
Oakfabco, Inc.<br />
MCG~VNEY & KLUGER, P.C.<br />
80 Broad Street-Suite 2300<br />
New York, New York 100<strong>04</strong><br />
(212) 509-3456<br />
Estate df Maurits C. Mu1<br />
WEITZ & LUXENBERG, P. t<br />
700 Broadway<br />
New York, New York 10003<br />
~pfi 2 6 2021<br />
SO ORDERED, ;!Y.>( I YORK<br />
ccf~~h~~t LERK s OFFICE'
SUPREME COURT OF I'HE STATE OF NEW YORK<br />
couN'ry OF NEW YORK<br />
---<br />
IN RE: NEW YORK COUNTY i NYCAL<br />
ASBESTOS LITIGATION<br />
THIS DOCUMENT REFmTO:<br />
-A<br />
ANNA MULDER, INDIVIDIJALLY AND AS<br />
ADMINISTMTRIX FOR THE ESTATE OF<br />
MAUKITS C. MULDER,<br />
Plaintiffs,<br />
j 1.A.S. Part 30<br />
! (Heitler, J.)<br />
[ Index No.: 123057/00<br />
[<br />
; NO OPPOSITION<br />
j SUMMARY JUDGMENT<br />
[ MOTION AND ORDER<br />
-against-<br />
A. C. & S., INC., et al.,<br />
Defendants. ;<br />
WHEREFORE, defendant, Treadwell Corporation, hereby requests summary judgment in<br />
the above entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules $ 3212, dismissing plaintiffs'<br />
complaint against defendant, Treadwell Corporation, with prejudice in this action, and there<br />
being no opposition thereto,<br />
QRDEKED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against<br />
defendant, Treadwell Corporation, be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and<br />
without costs.<br />
Treadwell Corporation<br />
MCCIVNEY & KLUGER, P.C.<br />
80 Broad Street-Suite 2300<br />
New York, New York 10<br />
(212) 509-3456<br />
WEITZ & LUXENBERG, P.C.<br />
700 Broadway<br />
New Y ork, New Y ork 10003<br />
APR 2 6 20<strong>11</strong><br />
SO ORDERED,<br />
QQl&liY<br />
NFW YORK<br />
CLERK'S OFFICE<br />
N0<strong>04</strong><strong>04</strong>78-1
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YON<br />
- COUNTY OF NEW YORK<br />
1~ RE: NEW Y~RK COUNTY<br />
i NYCAL<br />
ASBESTOS LITIGATION<br />
i I.A.S. Part 39<br />
- ! (Heitler, J.)<br />
THIS DOClJMENT REFERS TO:<br />
i lndex No.: 123088/00<br />
ROBERT C. LOUGHLIN, SR.,<br />
A. C. & S., INC., et al.,<br />
Plaintiffs, i NO OPPOSITION<br />
f SUMMARY JUDGMENT<br />
-against- j MOTION AND ORDER<br />
Defendants. 4 !<br />
WHEREFORE, defendant, Oakfabco, Inc., hereby requests summary judgment in the<br />
above entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules tj 3212, dismissing plaintiffs'<br />
complaint against defendant, Oakfabco, Inc., with prejudice in this action, and there being no<br />
opposition thereto,<br />
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against<br />
defendant, Oakfabco, Inc., be and the sane are hereby dismissed with prejudice and without<br />
costs.<br />
Dated: New Y<br />
Q*[-Q<br />
Robkrt Darish, Esq.<br />
Attorney for Defendant<br />
Oakfabco, Inc.<br />
MCGI~NEY & KLUGER, P.C.<br />
80 Broad Street-Suite 2300<br />
New York, New York 100<strong>04</strong><br />
(212) 509-3456<br />
SO ORDERED,<br />
WEITZ & LUXENBERG, P.C.<br />
700 Broadway<br />
New York, New York 10003<br />
257<br />
APR 2 6 ZO'<br />
n\E')l YORK<br />
cbUNiy -074 CLERKS OFFICE'<br />
N0<strong>04</strong><strong>04</strong>74-1
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK<br />
COUNTY OF NEW YORK<br />
In Re: NEW YORK CITYASBESTOS LITIGATION<br />
Index No.: 123830/00<br />
PAUL DUNPHEY,<br />
Plaintiff(s),<br />
NO OPPOSITION<br />
SUMMARY JUDGMENT<br />
MOTION<br />
- against -<br />
AT: apd S, JNC., (ARMSGTRONG<br />
CONTRACTING & SUPPLY) et al.,<br />
Defendants.<br />
WHEREFORE, Defendant WEIL-MCLAIN COMPANY, INC., hereinafter (“WEIL-<br />
MCLAIN”) hereby requests Summary Judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil<br />
Practice Law and Rules Section 3212, dismissing plaintiff’s complaint against Defendant Weil-<br />
McLain with prejudice, and there being no opposition thereto,<br />
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against<br />
Defendant, Weil-McLain be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and without costs<br />
to either party.<br />
Dated: qFq ,20<strong>11</strong><br />
New York, New York<br />
crJ$2---<br />
Jennifer L, Budner, Esq.<br />
WEITZ & LUXENBERG, P.C. SEGAL McCAMBRIDGE<br />
Attorneys for Plaintiff<br />
SINGER & MAHONEY, LTD.<br />
700 Broadway Attorneys for Defendant F I I.. E D<br />
New York, NY 10003<br />
Weil-McLain<br />
(212) 558-5500<br />
850 Third Avenue, Suite <strong>11</strong>00<br />
APR 2 6 20<strong>11</strong><br />
New York, NY 10022<br />
NEW YOHK<br />
COUNTY CLERK‘S OFFGF<br />
SO ORDERED,<br />
A?\? x 5 20<strong>11</strong>
SUPREME coum- OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK<br />
- COUNTY _ - _ OF ~ NEW YORK<br />
IN KE: NEW YOKK COUNTY<br />
ASBESTOS LITIGATION<br />
THIS DOCUMENT REFERS TO:<br />
PETER AVAKAS AND DOLORES AVARAS,<br />
--<br />
! NYCAL<br />
; I.A.S. Part 30<br />
(Heitler, J.)<br />
i<br />
; lndex No.: 123870/00<br />
i<br />
-against-<br />
Plaintiffs, / NO OPPOSITION<br />
/ SUMMARY JUDGMENT<br />
MOTION AND ORDER<br />
A. C. & S., TNC., et al.,<br />
- I<br />
Defendants. !<br />
WHEREFORE, defendant, Treadwell Corporation, hereby requests summary judgment in<br />
~<br />
the above entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules 5 3212, dismissing plaintiffs'<br />
I<br />
!<br />
complaint against defendant, Treadwell Corporation, with prejudice in this action, and there<br />
being no opposition thereto,<br />
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against<br />
defendant, Treadwell Corporation, be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and<br />
without costs.<br />
Dated: New York, New York<br />
4/l ,20<strong>11</strong><br />
L-<br />
Carol M. Ternpesta, bsq.<br />
Attorney for Defendant<br />
Treadwell Corporation<br />
MCGIVNEY & KLUGER, P.C.<br />
80 Broad Street-Suite 2300<br />
New York, New York 100<strong>04</strong><br />
(212) 509-3456<br />
SO ORDERED,<br />
Peter Avaras<br />
WEITZ & LUXENBERG, P.C.<br />
700 Broadway<br />
New York, New York 10003<br />
APR 2 6 20<strong>11</strong><br />
J235-4589 NEW YORK<br />
COUNTY CLERK'S OFFICE<br />
N0<strong>04</strong><strong>04</strong>78-1
---______I--<br />
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK<br />
C:OlJN'I'Y OF NEW YORK _--<br />
IN RE: NEW YORK COUNTY<br />
! NYCAL<br />
ASBESTOS LITIGATlON<br />
j 1,A.S. Part 30<br />
L_ --I<br />
-_-<br />
j (Heitler, J.)<br />
'THE DOCUMENT REFERS TO:<br />
j Index No.: 123870/00<br />
PETER AVARAS AND DOLORES AVARAS,<br />
-against-<br />
Plaintiffs, / NO OPPOSlTION<br />
j SUMMARY JUDGMENT<br />
MOTION AND ORDER<br />
A. C. & S., INC., et al.,<br />
Defendants.<br />
i<br />
WHEREFORE, defendant, Courter & Company, Inc., hereby requests summary<br />
judgment in the above entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules 5 3212, dismissing<br />
plaintiffs' complaint against defendant, Courter & Company, Inc., with prejudice in this action,<br />
and there being no opposition thereto,<br />
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against<br />
defendant, Courter & Company, Xnc., be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and<br />
without costs.<br />
Dated: New Ygrk, New York<br />
Michele J. Mittleman, Esq.<br />
Attorney for Defendant<br />
Courter Cbmpany, Inc.<br />
MCGI~~NEY & KLUGER, P.C.<br />
SO Broad Street-Suite 2300<br />
New York, New York 100<strong>04</strong><br />
(212) 509-3456<br />
SO ORDERED,<br />
Peter Avaras<br />
700 Broadway<br />
New York, New York 10003 APR 6 20<strong>11</strong><br />
CS@%6S<br />
YCWK<br />
1 ERKS OFFICE"<br />
N0<strong>04</strong><strong>04</strong>78-1
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK<br />
COUNTY OF NEW YORK<br />
IN RE: NEW YORK COUNTY j NYCAL<br />
ASBESTOS LITIGATION<br />
THIS DOCUMENT REFERS TO:<br />
-<br />
THEODORE FRASIER, EXECUTOR FOR THE<br />
ESTATE OF CLYDE FRASIEK,<br />
-against-<br />
A. C. & S., INC., et al.,<br />
Plaintiffs,<br />
Defendants. !<br />
j 1.A.S. Part 30<br />
:<br />
0<br />
(Heitler, 3.)<br />
j IndexN .. 124331/0 100757/03<br />
!<br />
i<br />
NO OPPOSITION<br />
! SUMMARY JUDGMENT<br />
j MOTION AND 0IRI)ER<br />
WHEREFORE, defendant, Treadwell Corporation, hereby requests summary judgment in<br />
the above entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules tj 3212, dismissing plaintiffs'<br />
complaint against defendant, Treadwell Corporation, with prejudice in this action, and there<br />
being no opposition thereto,<br />
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against<br />
defendant, Treadwell Corporation, be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and<br />
without costs.<br />
Dated: New York, New York<br />
TL<br />
Treadwell Corporation<br />
MCGIVNEY & KLUGER, P.C.<br />
SO Broad Street-Suite 2300<br />
New York, New York 100<strong>04</strong><br />
(212) 509-3456<br />
SO ORDERED,<br />
Estate of Clyde Frasier<br />
WEITZ & LUXENBERG, P.C.<br />
700 Broadway<br />
NewYork,NewYork 10003<br />
;,yz 2 lj 20<strong>11</strong><br />
?\!E%;; "'r&K<br />
COUNTY CLERK'S OFFICE<br />
1235-1699<br />
N0<strong>04</strong><strong>04</strong>78-1
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK<br />
COUNTY<br />
~ OF NEW YORK<br />
1N RE: NEW YO= COUNTY : NYCAJ,<br />
ASBESTOS 1,lTIGA'I'ION<br />
I I.A.S. Part 30<br />
! (Heitler, J.)<br />
'I'HIS DOCUMENT REFERS TO:<br />
Index 00757/03<br />
TI EODOKE FRASIER, EXECUTOR FOR THE i<br />
ESTATE OF CLYDE FRASIER,<br />
[ NO OPPOSITION<br />
Plaintiffs, ! SUMMARY JUDGMENT<br />
j MOTION AND ORDER<br />
-against-<br />
A. C. & S., INC., et ul.,<br />
- ~<br />
Defendants.<br />
j<br />
WHEREFORE, defendant, Tishman Liquidating Corp., hereby requests summary<br />
judgment in the above entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules 5 3212, dismissing<br />
plaintiffs' coniplaint against defendant, Tishman Liquidating Corp., with prejudice in this action,<br />
and there being no opposition thereto,<br />
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against<br />
defendant, Tishman Liquidating Corp., be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and<br />
without costs.<br />
MCG~VNEY & KLUGER, P.C.<br />
80 Broad Street-Suite 2300<br />
New York, New York 100<strong>04</strong><br />
(212) 509-3456<br />
SO ORDERED,<br />
Estate of Clyde Frasier<br />
WEITZ & LUXENBERG, P.C.<br />
700 Broadway<br />
NewYork,NewYork 10003<br />
APR 2 6 20<strong>11</strong><br />
NEW YORK<br />
COUNTY CLERK'S OFFICE<br />
2383-22283<br />
N0<strong>04</strong><strong>04</strong>78-1<br />
APR 15 20<strong>11</strong>
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YON<br />
-. COUNTY OF NEW YON I-<br />
IN RE: NEW YORK COUNTY j NYCAL<br />
ASBESTOS LITIGATION j 1.A.S. Part 30<br />
! (Heitler, J.)<br />
-I<br />
'rws DOCUMENT REFERS TO:<br />
j Index No.: 124332/00<br />
ROSEMARY MICHEL, INDIVIDUALLY AND /<br />
AS EXECUTRIX FOR THE ESTATE OF<br />
GERALD J. MICHEL, i NO OPPOSITION<br />
i SUMMARY JUDGMENT<br />
Plaintiffs, MOTION AND ORDER<br />
-against-<br />
A. C. & S., INC., et al.,<br />
Defendants. :<br />
WHEEFORE, defendant, Treadwell Corporation, hereby requests summary judgment in<br />
the above entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Q 3212, dismissing plaintiffs'<br />
complaint against defendant, Treadwell Corporation, with prejudice in this action, and there<br />
being no opposition thereto,<br />
ORDERED, that upon notice to all c,o-defendants, all claims and cross claims against<br />
defendant, Treadwell Corporation, be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and<br />
without costs.<br />
Carol M. Tempesta, Esq.<br />
Attorney for Defendant<br />
Treadwell Corporation<br />
MCGIVNEY & KLUGER, P.C.<br />
80 Broad Street-Suite 2300<br />
700 Broadway<br />
New York, New York 100<strong>04</strong><br />
(212) 509-3456 2 6 20<strong>11</strong><br />
SO ORDERED, ": J' :(.,RK<br />
I- CLERK'S OFFICE<br />
N0<strong>04</strong><strong>04</strong>74-1<br />
APR 'I, 5 20<strong>11</strong>
I--<br />
SUPREME COURT OF THE STAl-E OF NEW YON<br />
COUNTY OF NEW YOKK<br />
IN RE: NEW YmTOETY<br />
! NYCAL<br />
ASBESTOS LJTlGATION<br />
j 1.A.S. Part 30<br />
! (Heitler, J.)<br />
_"-A<br />
_-<br />
THIS DOCUMENT REFERS TO:<br />
i Index No.: 124332/00<br />
ROSEMARY MICHEL, INDIVTDUAL1,Y AND<br />
AS EXECUTRIX FOR THE ESTATE OF<br />
GERALD L. MICHEL, i NO OPPOSITION<br />
j SUMMARY JUDGMENT<br />
Plaintiffs, i MOTION AND ORDER<br />
-against-<br />
A. C. & S., INC., et al.,<br />
Defendants.<br />
i<br />
WHEREFORE, defendant, Oakfabco, Inc., hereby requests summary judgment in the<br />
above entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules 8 3212, dismissing plaintiffs'<br />
complaint against defendant, Oakfabco, Inc., with prejudice in this action, and there being no<br />
opposition thereto,<br />
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against<br />
defendant, Oakfabco, Inc., be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and without<br />
costs.<br />
Dated: New Y rk, New York<br />
4 1 ,20<strong>11</strong><br />
Q*LQpJ<br />
Robert Darish, Esq.<br />
Attorney for Defendant<br />
Oakfabco, Inc.<br />
MCGIVNEY & KLUGER, P.C.<br />
80 Broad Street-Suite 2300<br />
New York, New York 100<strong>04</strong><br />
(212) 509-3456<br />
WElTZ & LUXENBERG, P.C.<br />
700 Broadway<br />
Fl<br />
SO ORDERED, APR 2 6 20<strong>11</strong><br />
2571-0747<br />
N0<strong>04</strong><strong>04</strong>74-1<br />
W ~ N + I<br />
I\!-<br />
'IC\ YORK<br />
V CLERKS OFFICE'
JYCAL<br />
TWILIA L. BILBY, as Administratrix for the : Index No. 125<strong>26</strong>3/00<br />
Estate of LANE L. BILBY, and TWILIA L.<br />
BILBY, Individually,<br />
: NO OPPOSITION<br />
Plaintiffs, : SUMMARY JUDGMENT<br />
: MOTION AND ORDER<br />
"against-<br />
A.C. & S., INC., ad.,<br />
: Hon. Sherry Klein Heitler,<br />
IAS Part 30<br />
WHEREFORE, defendant Georgia-Pacific LLC hereby request summary<br />
judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to CPLR 3212, dismissing plaintiffs'<br />
complaint against Georgia-Pacific LLC with prejudice, and there being no opposition<br />
thereto, it is hereby:<br />
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims<br />
against Georgia-Pacific LLC be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and<br />
without costs.<br />
WEITZ & LUXENBERG, P.C.<br />
Attorneys for Plaintiffs<br />
700 Broadway<br />
<strong>26</strong>4 West 40th Street<br />
New York, New York 10003<br />
New York, New York 10018<br />
(212) 558-5500 (212) 302-2400<br />
Dated: New York, New York<br />
APR 2 6 20<strong>11</strong><br />
NEW YORK<br />
c13blN~-~ CLERK'S OFFICE'<br />
SO ORDERED:
-_--<br />
COUNTY OF NEW Y ORK -<br />
1N RE: NEW YORK COUNTY<br />
ASBESTOS LITIGATION<br />
--<br />
I NYCAL<br />
j I.A.S. Part 30<br />
i (Heiller. 3.1<br />
- .<br />
TINS DOCUMENT REFERS TO:<br />
j Jndex No.: <strong>11</strong>939O/<br />
13 E'T'I'Y BI SHOP, INDIVIDUALLY AND<br />
EXECUTRIX FOR THE ESTATE OF ROBERT<br />
D. BISHOP, SR.,<br />
-against-<br />
A. C. & S., lNc., et af.,<br />
P laj nti ffs ,<br />
j<br />
/ NO OPPOSITION<br />
i SUMMARY JUDGMENT<br />
MOTION AND ORDER<br />
i<br />
n<br />
Defendants.<br />
j<br />
WHEREFORE, defendant, Patterson Pump Ca., hereby requests summary judgment in<br />
the above entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules $ 3212, dismissing plaintiffs'<br />
complaint against defendant, Patterson Pump Co., with prejudice in this action, and there being<br />
no opposition thereto,<br />
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against<br />
defendant, Patterson Pump Co., be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and without<br />
costs.<br />
NO<strong>04</strong><strong>04</strong>78- 1<br />
APR 1520<strong>11</strong>
-<br />
COUNTY OF NEW YORK<br />
.- tN E: NEW YORK coumy<br />
,___ -<br />
AS BES' ['OS L ITIG AT1 ON<br />
_-____-___<br />
13E'I'l-Y BISHOP, JNDIVIDUALIdY AND<br />
EXECUTRIX FOR THE ESTATE OF ROBERT<br />
D. BISHOP, SK.,<br />
PI ain tiffs,<br />
NY CAL,<br />
I.A.S. Pa<strong>11</strong> 30<br />
(Heitler, J.)<br />
w<br />
Index No.: <strong>11</strong>9390/00 125<strong>26</strong>8/0<br />
NO OPPOSITION<br />
SIJMMARY - -. JUDGMENT<br />
MOTlON AND ORDER<br />
n<br />
-against-<br />
A. C. & S., INC., et al.,<br />
- Defendants. j<br />
WHEREFORE, defendant,, Safeguard Industrial Equipment Co., hereby requests<br />
summary judgment in the above entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules 9 3212,<br />
dismissing plaintiffs' complaint against defendant, Safeguard Industrial Equipment Co., with<br />
prejudice in this action, and there being no opposition thereto,<br />
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against<br />
defendant, Safeguard Industrial Equipment Co., be and the same are hereby dismissed with<br />
prejudice and without costs.<br />
Attorney for Defendant<br />
Safeguard Industrial Equipment Co.<br />
MCGIVNEY & KLUGER, P.C.<br />
80 Broad Street-Suite 2300<br />
New York, New York 100<strong>04</strong><br />
(212) 509-3456<br />
SO ORDERED,<br />
Estate of Robert D. Bishop, Sr.<br />
WElTZ & LUXENBERG,<br />
700 Broadway<br />
New York, New York 1 003<br />
FILED<br />
LPR 2 6 Ntl
SUPKEME COURT OF *rm STATE OF NEW YORK<br />
--- COUNTY OFNEW YOKK<br />
IN RE: NEW YORK COTjNy<br />
NYCAL<br />
ASBESTOS LI'fIGATI ON<br />
I.A.S. Part 30<br />
(Heitler, J.)<br />
THIS DOCUMENT REFERS TO:<br />
BETTY BISHOP, INDIVIDUALLY AND<br />
EXECUTRIX FOR THE ESTATE OF ROBERT<br />
D. BISHOP, SK.,<br />
-against-<br />
A. C. & S., TNC., et ul.,<br />
Plaintiffs,<br />
Defendants.<br />
Index No.: <strong>11</strong>93901 0, 125<strong>26</strong>8/0<br />
NO OPPOSITION<br />
SUMMARY JUDGMENT<br />
MOTION AND ORDER<br />
("2<br />
WHEREFORE, defendant, Treadwell Corporation, hereby requests summary judgment in<br />
the above entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules $ 3212, dismissing plaintiffs'<br />
complaint against defendant, Treadwell Corporation, with prejudice in this action, and there<br />
being no opposition thereto,<br />
OFUIERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against<br />
defendant, Treadwell Corporation, be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and<br />
without costs.<br />
Carol M. Tempesta, Esq.<br />
Attorney for Defendant<br />
Treadwell Corporation<br />
MCGIVNEY & KLUGER, P.C.<br />
80 Broad Street-Suite 2300<br />
New York, New York 100<strong>04</strong><br />
(21 2) 509-3456<br />
SO ORDERED,<br />
,20<strong>11</strong> p.,<br />
*y-=-h&* ) p)<br />
L% ic f*<br />
, LtlPb+XWJ<br />
k+az*f#*<br />
f - d fiG2-i t_<br />
Attorney for Plaintiffs<br />
Estate of Robert D. Bishop,<br />
WEITZ & LUXENBERG, P.C.<br />
700 Broadway<br />
New York, New York 10003<br />
1235-20654<br />
APR 2 6 20<strong>11</strong><br />
pdy-\\*j '*iCRK<br />
C;LZHK;'S OFFICE<br />
N0<strong>04</strong><strong>04</strong>78-1<br />
p,pR 15 20<strong>11</strong>
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK<br />
COUNTY OF NEW YORK<br />
IN RE: NEW YORK COUNTY j NYCAL<br />
ASBESTOS LITIGATION j I.A.S. Part 30<br />
- 1 1 ~<br />
THIS DOCUMENT REFERS TO:<br />
BETTY BISHOP, INDIVIDUALLY AND<br />
EXECUTRIX FOR THE ESTATE OF ROBERT<br />
D. BISHOP, SR.,<br />
-against-<br />
A. C. & S., INC., et al.,<br />
i<br />
0<br />
(Heitler, J.)<br />
i lndex No.: <strong>11</strong>9390/00, 25<strong>26</strong>8/0<br />
j<br />
/ NO OPPOSITION<br />
j<br />
SUMMARY JUDGMENT<br />
Plaintiffs, i MOTION AND OR.DER<br />
Defendants.<br />
j<br />
WHEREFORE, defendant, Tishman Liquidating Cop, hereby requests summary<br />
judgment in the above entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules 6 3212, dismissing<br />
plaintiffs’ complaint against defendant, Tishman Liquidating Corp., with prejudice in this action,<br />
and there being no opposition thereto,<br />
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against<br />
defendant, Tishman Liquidating Corp., be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and<br />
without costs.<br />
Dated: New Yo&, New York<br />
($ttomey fordant<br />
ishman Li dating Coy.<br />
MCCIVNEY KLUGER, P.C.<br />
80 Broad Street-Suite 2300<br />
New York, New York 100<strong>04</strong><br />
(212) 509-3456<br />
SO ORDERED,<br />
Hon. Sherry Klein Heitler<br />
Y. -\*A.<br />
5-<br />
h w *<br />
>,-<br />
Estate of Robert D. Bishop, Srd::<br />
WEITZ & LUXENBERG, P.C. h<br />
700 Broadway<br />
York, New York 10003<br />
/),E. i. 2. 6 20<strong>11</strong><br />
:I. ‘id kGRi<<br />
COUNTY CLERKS QFFlCE<br />
2383-22475AR<br />
N0<strong>04</strong><strong>04</strong>78-I
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK<br />
COUNTY OF NEW YORK<br />
' NYCAL<br />
BETTY ANN BISHOP, Individually and as Executrix :<br />
Part 30<br />
for the Estate of ROBERT D. BISHOP SR.,<br />
(Hon. Sherry Klein Heitler)<br />
Plaintiff(s),<br />
* Index No.: 125<strong>26</strong>8-00<br />
WHEREFORE, defendant CRANE CO. hereby requests summary judgment in the<br />
above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 32 12, dismissing<br />
plaintiffs complaint against defendant CRANE CO. with prejudice, and there being no<br />
opposition thereto,<br />
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against<br />
defendant CRANE CO, be, and the same are hereby, dismissed with prejudice and without costs.<br />
Dated: 3 \> O\ \ \<br />
NewAork, New York<br />
Frank Ortiz, Esq.<br />
WEITZ & LUXENB<br />
Attorneys for Plaintiff(s)<br />
700 Broadway<br />
New York, NY 10003<br />
(2 12) 558-5500<br />
CRANE CO.<br />
599 Lexington Aven FILED<br />
e<br />
New York, NY 10022<br />
(212) 536-3900<br />
APR 2 6 20<strong>11</strong><br />
'
New<br />
LAWRENCE F. CAVESE and ANNA CAVESE,<br />
-against-<br />
Plaintiffs,<br />
NYCAL<br />
I.A.S. Part 30<br />
Hon. Sherry Klein Heitler, J.S.C.<br />
Index No.: f i z ><br />
<strong>11</strong>9387-2000<br />
NO OPPOSITION SUMMARY JUDGMENT<br />
MOTION AND ORDER<br />
A.C. &S. INC., et al. including,<br />
FOSTER WHEELER CORPORATION,<br />
Defendants.<br />
WHEREFORE, defendant FOSTER WHEELER, L.L.C. (sued herein as “FOSTER WHEELER<br />
CORPORATION”) hereby request summary judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil<br />
Practice Law and Rules Section 3212, dismissing plaintiffs’ complaint against defendant FOSTER<br />
WHEELER, L.L.C. with prejudice, and there being no opposition thereto,<br />
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against defendant<br />
FOSTER WHEELER, L.L.C. be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and without costs.<br />
Dated:<br />
I<br />
York, New York<br />
Frank Ortiz, Esq.<br />
Weitz i3 Luxenberg, P.C.<br />
Attorney for Plaintvfs<br />
700 Broadway<br />
New York, New York 100<br />
--<br />
Dennis E. Vega, Esq. ()<br />
Sedgwick, Detert, Moran & Arnold, LLP<br />
Attorneys for Foster Wheeler, I. L.C.<br />
Three Gateway Center, 12‘h Floor<br />
wark, NJ 07102<br />
SO ORDERED, APR 2 6 20<strong>11</strong><br />
NEW YORK<br />
COUNTY CLERK‘S OFFIS<br />
NJ/34 1736~1
NYCAL<br />
I.A.S. Part 30<br />
Hon. Sherry Klein Heitler, J.S.C.<br />
THOMAS CARROLL et al.,<br />
Index No.:<br />
-against-<br />
A.C. &S. INC., et al. including,<br />
FOSTER WHEELER CORPORATION,<br />
Plaintiff,<br />
NO OPPOSITION SUMMARY JUDGMENT<br />
MOTION AND ORDER<br />
Defendants.<br />
WHEREFORE, defendant FOSTER WHEELER, L.L.C. (sued herein as “FOSTER WHEELER<br />
CORPORATION”) hereby request summary judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil<br />
Practice Law and Rules Section 3212, dismissing plaintiffs’ complaint against defendant FOSTER<br />
WHEELER, L.L.C. with prejudice, and there being no opposition thereto,<br />
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against defendant<br />
FOSTER WHEELER, L.L.C. be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and without costs.<br />
Frank Ortiz, Esq.<br />
Weitz & Luxenberg, P.C.<br />
Sedgwick, Detert, Moran & Arnold, LLP<br />
Attorney for Plaintflfs<br />
Attorneys for Foster Wheeler, L. L.C.<br />
700 Broadway<br />
Three Gateway Center, 12fh Floor<br />
New York, New York 10003 Newark, NJ 07102<br />
SO ORDERED,<br />
F\LEQ<br />
NJ/341735vl
-I-<br />
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK<br />
COUNTY OF NEW YORK<br />
IN RE: NEW YO% COUNTY<br />
! NYCAI,<br />
ASBESTOS LITIGATION<br />
i I.A.S. Part 30<br />
0<br />
! (Heitler, J.)<br />
THIS DOCUMENT REFERS TO:<br />
j Index No.: <strong>11</strong>9394/0 100588/0<br />
HARVEY L. FLEITMAN AND VIVIAN M.<br />
FLEITMAN,<br />
\ NO OPPOSITION<br />
Plaintiffs, j SUMMARY JUDGMENT<br />
/ MOTION AND OlRDER<br />
-against-<br />
A. C. & S., INC., et al.,<br />
Defendants.<br />
i<br />
WHEREFORE, defendant, Oakfabco, Inc., hereby requests summary judgr e t in the<br />
above entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules § 3212, dismissing plaintiffs'<br />
complaint against defendant, Oakfabco, Inc., with prejudice in this action, and there being no<br />
opposition thereto,<br />
ORDEWD, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against<br />
defendant, Oakfabco, Inc., be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and without<br />
costs.<br />
Dated: New York, New York<br />
D<br />
Attorney for Defendant<br />
F+['rx<br />
Oakfabco, Inc.<br />
HarveyL. Fleitman and Vivi<br />
MCGIVNEY & KI,UGER, P.C.<br />
WEITZ & LUXENBERG, P.C.<br />
80 Broad Street-Suite 2300<br />
700 Broadway<br />
New York, New York 100<strong>04</strong><br />
(212) 509-3456<br />
New York, New York 10003<br />
(212) 558-5500 APR 2 6 20<strong>11</strong><br />
SO ORDERED,<br />
NEW VQRK<br />
2E@WiV Ci&WS OFFICE<br />
N0<strong>04</strong><strong>04</strong>74-1
_-I--<br />
SlJPREME COURT OF 'THE STATE OF NEW YORK<br />
COUNTY OF NEW YORK<br />
IN RE: NEW YokTmr'u'<br />
! NYCAL<br />
ASBESTOS LITIGATION<br />
j I.A.S. Part 30<br />
- / (Heitler, 3.)<br />
THIS DOCUMENT REFERS TO:<br />
HARVEY L. FLEITMAN AND VIVIAN M.<br />
FLEITMAN,<br />
-against-<br />
A. C. & S., INC., et al.,<br />
P 1 ain t i ffs ,<br />
0<br />
f Index No.: <strong>11</strong>9394/ 0, 100588/01<br />
i NO OPPOSITION<br />
i SUMMARY JUDGMENT<br />
MOTION AND ORDER<br />
Defendants.<br />
j<br />
WHEREFORE, defendant, Treadwell Corporation, hereby requests summary judgment in<br />
the above entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules 3 3212, dismissing plaintiffs'<br />
complaint against defendant, Treadwell Corporation, with prejudice in this action, and there<br />
being no opposition thereto,<br />
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against<br />
defendant, Treadwell Corporation, be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and<br />
without costs.<br />
Carol M. Tempesta, Esq.<br />
Attorney for Defendant<br />
Treadwell Corporation<br />
MCGIVNEY & ICLUCER, P.C.<br />
80 Broad Street-Suite 2300<br />
New York, New York 100<strong>04</strong><br />
(21 2) 509-3456 (212) 558-5500<br />
SO ORDERED,<br />
Harvey L. Fleitman and Vivian M. Fleitmk<br />
WEITZ & LUXENBERG, P.C.<br />
700 Broadway<br />
New York, New York 10003<br />
1235-1 9822<br />
APR 2 6 20l1<br />
N0<strong>04</strong><strong>04</strong>78-1<br />
APR 15 20<strong>11</strong>
I<br />
COIJN'rY OF NEW YOKK ..-<br />
_.-_.L__-___- ---I__--.<br />
1N RE: NEW YOKK COUNTY i NYCAL<br />
ASBESTOS L,ITlG AT1 ON<br />
j I.A.S. Part 30<br />
...A! (Ilcitler, J.)<br />
- -.<br />
T€€IS DOCUMENT EFERS TO:<br />
WARVEY L. FLEI'TMAN AND VIVIAN M.<br />
ELEITMAN,<br />
-against-<br />
Plaintiffs,<br />
0<br />
; Index No.: <strong>11</strong>9394/00, I005&8/<br />
NO Ol'POSlTION<br />
i SUMMARY JUDGMENT<br />
i MOTION AND ORDER<br />
A. C. & S., INC., et al.,<br />
Defendants. - i<br />
WHEREFORE, defendant, Safeguard Industrial Equipment Co., hereby requests<br />
summary judgment in the above entitled case, pursuant to Civil. Practice Law and Rules 0 3212,<br />
dismissing plaintiffs' complaint against defendant, Safeguard Industrial Equipment Co., with<br />
prejudice in this action, and there being no opposition thereto,<br />
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against<br />
defendant, Safeguard Industrial Equipment Co., be and the same are hereby dismissed with<br />
prejudice and without costs.<br />
Attorney for Defend<br />
Harvey L. Fleitman and Vivian M, Fleitman<br />
MCGWNEY & KLUGER, P.C.<br />
WEITZ & LUXENBERG, P.C.<br />
80 Broad Street-Suite 2300<br />
700 Broadway<br />
New York, New York 100<strong>04</strong><br />
New York, New York 1<br />
(212) 509-3456 , (212) 558-5500
~ c(iuN'rY<br />
L<br />
SUPREME COiURT OF 'IHE STATE OF NEW YORK<br />
OF NEW I YORK _-<br />
_____I<br />
iN RE: NEW YOIX cowry<br />
j NYCAL<br />
AS €3 EST0 S LIT I GATT ON<br />
j I.A.S. Part 30<br />
i<br />
0<br />
(Heitler, J.)<br />
_- --_._I-<br />
THIS DOCUMENT REFERS TO:<br />
j Index No.: <strong>11</strong>9394/ 100588/01<br />
HARVEY i, FLEI'I'MAN AND VIVIAN M.<br />
FLEITMAN,<br />
[ NO OPPOSITION<br />
Plaintiffs? j SUMMARY JUDGMENT<br />
\ MOTJON AND ORDER<br />
-against-<br />
A. C. & S., INC., et al.,<br />
Defendants.<br />
WHEREFORE, defendant, Courter & Company, Inc., hereby requests summary<br />
j<br />
/<br />
judgment in the above entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules 5 3212, dismissing<br />
plaintiffs' complaint against defendant, Courter & Company, Inc., with prejudice in this action,<br />
and there being no opposition thereto,<br />
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against<br />
defendant, Courter & Company, hc., be and the shme are hereby dismissed with prejudice and<br />
without costs.<br />
80 Broad Street-Suite 2300<br />
New York, New York 100<strong>04</strong><br />
(21 2> 509-3456<br />
WEITZ & LUXENBERG, P.C.<br />
SO ORDERED,<br />
N0<strong>04</strong><strong>04</strong>78-1
SIJPIIEME COURT OF 'THE S'I'ATE OF NEW YORK<br />
COUNTY OF NEW YORK .-<br />
IN RE: NEW YORK COUNTY / NYCAL,<br />
ASBESTOS LIT1 G A'1 'I ON j I.A.S. Part 30<br />
\ (Heitlcr, J.)<br />
0<br />
-<br />
THIS DOCUMENT REFERS 'ro:<br />
j Index No.: <strong>11</strong>9394/00 100585/01<br />
HARVEY L. FLEITMAN AND VIVIAN M.<br />
FLEJTMAN,<br />
-against-<br />
A. C. & S., I'NC., et al.,<br />
PI ai nt i ffs,<br />
[ NO OYPOSlTION<br />
j SUMMARY JUDGMENT<br />
i MOTION AND ORDER<br />
Defendants.<br />
j<br />
WHEREFORJZ, defendant, Tishman Liquidating Corp., hereby requests summary<br />
judgment in the above entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules 5 3212, dismissing<br />
plaintiffs' complaint against defendant, Tishman Liquidating Corp., with prejudice in this action,<br />
and there being no opposition thereto,<br />
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against<br />
defendant, Tishman Liquidating Corp., be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and<br />
without costs.<br />
MCGIVNEY & KLUGER, P.C.<br />
SO Broad Street-Suite 2300<br />
New York, New York 100<strong>04</strong><br />
(212) 509-3456<br />
SO ORDERED,<br />
700 Broadway<br />
New York, New York 10003<br />
2383-22468U<br />
N0<strong>04</strong><strong>04</strong>78-I
SIJI'REME COUK'I' OF THE STATE OF NEW YOKK<br />
COUN'TY OF NEW YORK<br />
.-~I-" - -_ --<br />
~hr RE NEW YORK couwry<br />
: NYCAL,<br />
A SB E S 1'0 S LIT1 GAT1 ON<br />
i I.A.S. Part 30<br />
j (Heitler,.I.><br />
0<br />
THlS DOCUMENT REFERS 'TO:<br />
j Index No. : <strong>11</strong>9394/00 100621 /O<br />
JOSE F. FERNANDEZ AND ARLENE<br />
FEKNANDEZ,<br />
i NO OPPOSITION<br />
Plaintiffs, j SUMMARY JUDGMENT<br />
i MOTION AND ORJIER<br />
-against-<br />
A. C. & S., INC., et al.,<br />
Defendants.<br />
I<br />
WHEREFORE, defendant, Patterson Pump Co., hereby requests summary judgment in<br />
the above entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules § 3212, dismissing plaintiffs'<br />
complaint against defendant, Patterson Pump Co., with prejudice in this action, and there being<br />
no opposition thereto,<br />
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against<br />
defendant, Patterson Pump Co., be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and without<br />
costs.<br />
Dated: New Yo&, New York<br />
Pattersin pump CO.<br />
MCGIVNEY & KLUGER, P.C.<br />
80 Broad Street-Suite 2300<br />
New York, New York 100<strong>04</strong><br />
(212) 509-3456<br />
SO ORDERED,<br />
,<br />
---e<br />
Hon. Sherry Klein Heitler<br />
Jose F. Fernandez and Arlene Fernandez<br />
WEITZ & LUXENBERG, P.C.<br />
700 Broadway<br />
New York, New York 100<br />
2 6 la''<br />
s OFF\CEJ<br />
CLERK<br />
454-8847b1p,.,' \/QRK<br />
coiut\s7v<br />
N0<strong>04</strong><strong>04</strong>78-1
SLJ PlERIE COURT OF 'THE STATE OF NEW YORK<br />
COUNTY OF NEW YORK<br />
IN RE: NEW YORK COUN'I'Y<br />
NYCAL<br />
ASBES'I'OS LITIGA'rION<br />
1.A.S. Part 30<br />
(Hei tler, J .)<br />
THIS DOCUMENT REFERS TO:<br />
Index No.:<br />
JOSE F. FERNANDEZ AND ARLENE<br />
FERNANDEZ,<br />
NO OPPOSITION<br />
Plaintiffs, SUMMARY JUDGMENT<br />
MOTION AND ORDER<br />
-against-<br />
A. C. & S., INC., et al.,<br />
Defendants.<br />
i<br />
WHEREFORE, defendant, Courter & Company, Inc., hereby requests summary<br />
judgment in the above entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules 0 3212, dismissing<br />
plaintiffs' complaint against defendant, Courter & Company, Inc., with prejudice in this action,<br />
and there being no opposition thereto,<br />
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against<br />
defendant, Courter & Company, Inc., be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and<br />
without costs.<br />
Courter & Company, Inc.<br />
MCGIVNEY & UUGER, P.C.<br />
80 Broad Street-Suite 2300<br />
New York. New York 100<strong>04</strong><br />
(2 12) 509-3456<br />
SO ORDERED,<br />
Jose F. Femandez and Arlene Fernandez<br />
WElTZ & LUXENBERG, P.C.<br />
700 Broadway<br />
New York. New Yoxk 1000<br />
i<br />
I<br />
N0<strong>04</strong><strong>04</strong>78-1
~~<br />
I<br />
SUPKEME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YOKK<br />
COUNTY OF NEW YORK<br />
1N RE: NEW YORK COUNTY<br />
j NYCAL<br />
ASBESTOS LITIGATION<br />
j I.A.S. Part 30<br />
i (Heitler, J.)<br />
THIS DOCUMENT REFERS TO:<br />
-,<br />
Index No.:<br />
JOSE F. FEWANDEZ AND ARLENE<br />
FERNANDEZ,<br />
NO OPPOSITION<br />
Plaintiffs, SUMMARY JUDGMENT<br />
MOTION AND ORDER<br />
-against-<br />
A. C. & S., INC., etal.,<br />
Defendants.<br />
i<br />
WHEREFORE, defendant, Treadwell Corporation, hereby requests summary judgment in<br />
the above entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules 5 3212, dismissing plaintiffs'<br />
complaint against defendant, Treadwell Corporation, with prejudice in this action, and there<br />
being no opposition thereto,<br />
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against<br />
defendant, Treadwell Corporation, be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and<br />
without costs.<br />
Attorney for Defendant<br />
Treadwell Corporation<br />
Jose F. Fernandez and Arlene Fernandez<br />
MCGIVNEY & KLUGER, P.C.<br />
WEITZ & LUXENBERG, P.C.<br />
80 Broad Street-Suite 2300<br />
700 Broadway<br />
New York. New York 100<strong>04</strong><br />
New York, New York 10003<br />
(212) 509-3456 AFR 2 6 20<strong>11</strong><br />
SO ORDERED,<br />
NEW YG'TK<br />
QWR-rf CLERK'S OFF ICE<br />
N0<strong>04</strong><strong>04</strong>78-1
-I<br />
SUPREME COURT OF 'THE STATE OF NEW YORK<br />
-_--I COUNTY OF NEW YORK<br />
I-.-<br />
1N RE: NEW YON COUNT<br />
j NYCAL<br />
ASBESTOS LITIGATION<br />
i I.A.S. Part 30<br />
i (Heitler, J.)<br />
THIS DOCTJMENT REFERS TO:<br />
' Index No.:<br />
DAVID J. GIANCARLO AND NOREEN K.<br />
GIANCAKLO,<br />
NO OPPOSITION<br />
Plaintiffs, SUMMARY JUDGMENT<br />
MOTION AND ORDER<br />
-against-<br />
A. C. & S., INC., et ul.,<br />
Defendants.<br />
WHEREFORE, defendant, Oakfabco, Inc.,<br />
hereby requests summary judgment in the<br />
above entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules § 3212, dismissing plaintiffs'<br />
complaint against defendant, Oakfabco, Inc., with prejudice in this action, and there being no<br />
opposition thereto,<br />
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against<br />
defendant, Oakfabco, Inc., be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and without<br />
Costs.<br />
Dated: New York, New York<br />
Robert Darish, Esq.<br />
Attorney for Defendant<br />
Oakfabco, Inc.<br />
MCGIVNEY & KLUGER, P.C.<br />
80 Broad Street-Suite 2300<br />
New York, New York 100<strong>04</strong><br />
(2 12) 509-3456 APR 2 6 20<strong>11</strong><br />
NEW YORK<br />
N0<strong>04</strong><strong>04</strong>74-1
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK<br />
I COUNTY OF NEW YORK -<br />
IN RE: NEW YORK COUNTY<br />
! NYCAL<br />
ASBESTOS LITIGATION j I.A.S. Part 30<br />
i (Heitler, J.)<br />
THIS DOCUMENT REFERS TO:<br />
i Index No.: 101205/01<br />
FLORE ASHCRAFT, INDIVIDUALLY AND AS !<br />
PROPOSED EXECUTRIX FOR THE ESTATE<br />
j<br />
OF JAMES ASHCRAFT, \ NO OPPOSITION<br />
j SUMMARY JUDGMENT<br />
Plaintiffs, \ MOTION AND ORDER<br />
-against-<br />
A. C. & S., DX., et al.,<br />
Defendants. :<br />
WHEREFORE, defendant, Courter & Company, Inc., hereby requests summary<br />
judgment in the above entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules 5 3212, dismissing<br />
plaintiffs' complaint against defendant, Courter & Company, Inc., with prejudice in this action,<br />
and there being no opposition thereto,<br />
OKDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against<br />
defendant, Courter & Company, Inc., be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and<br />
without costs.<br />
Attorney for Defendant<br />
Courter & Company, Inc.<br />
MCGimY & KLUGER, P.C.<br />
80 Broad Street-Suite 2300<br />
New York, New York 100<strong>04</strong><br />
(212) 509-3456<br />
SO ORDERED,<br />
EstateofJames Ashcraft<br />
WEITZ & LUXENBERG, P.C.<br />
700 Broadway<br />
NewYork,NewYork 10003<br />
F 1 L E D<br />
APR 2 6 *'"<br />
b\E'
S[Jl'REMl? CXIIJK'T OF THE S'I'ATE OF NEW YORK<br />
C:OINI'Y OF NEW YOKK<br />
c<br />
IN RE: NEW YORK COUNTY<br />
i NYUAL<br />
ASBESTOS 1,JTIGATlON<br />
1 I.A.S. Part 30<br />
- i (Heitler, J.)<br />
THIS IlOClJMEN'T REFERS TOj<br />
Indcx No.: 101205/01<br />
FLORE ASHCRAFT, INDIVIDUALLY AND AS !<br />
PROPOSED EXECUTRIX FOR THE ESTATE i<br />
OF JAMES ASEICRAFT,<br />
: NO OPPOSITION<br />
! SUMMARY JUDGMENT<br />
Plaintiffs, j MOTION AND ORDER<br />
_____I^- -<br />
-against-<br />
A. C. & S., INC., et al.,<br />
~.-- Defendants. [<br />
WHEREFORE, defendant, Safeguard Industrial Equipment Co., hereby requests<br />
summary judgment in the above entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice L,aw and Rules 6 3212,<br />
dismissing plaintiffs' complaint against defendant, Safeguard Industrial Equipment Co., with<br />
prejudice in this action, and there being no opposition thereto,<br />
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against<br />
defendant, Safeguard Industrial Equipment Co., be and the same are hereby dismissed with<br />
prejudice and without costs.<br />
Dated: New York, New York<br />
fi<br />
--<br />
Attorney f 'or Defendant<br />
Safeguard Industrial Equipment Co.<br />
MCGIVNEY & KLWGER, P.C.<br />
80 Broad Street-Suite 2300<br />
New York, New York 100<strong>04</strong><br />
(212) 509-3456<br />
SO ORDERED,<br />
Attornev for Plaintiffs<br />
Estate df James Ashcraft<br />
WEITZ & LUXENBERG, P.<br />
700 Broadway<br />
w York, New York 10003<br />
a:<br />
ApR 2 6 ''"<br />
NOO4<strong>04</strong>78-I APR 15 20<strong>11</strong>
SUPREME COURT OF T€lE STATE OF NEW YOKK<br />
COUNTY OF NEW YORK<br />
’ IN RE: NEW YORK COUNTY<br />
ASBESTOS LITIGATION<br />
_.<br />
‘THIS DOCIJMENT REFERS TO:<br />
FLOE ASHCRAFT, INDIVIDUALLY AND AS<br />
PROPOSED EXECUTRIX FOR THE ESTATE<br />
OF JAMES ASHCRAFT,<br />
-against-<br />
A. C. & S., INC., et ul.,<br />
Plaintiffs,<br />
Defendants. -<br />
NYCAL<br />
I.A.S. Part 30<br />
(Hei tler, J .)<br />
Index No.: 101205/01<br />
NO OPPOSITION<br />
SUMMARY ,JUDGMENT<br />
MOTION AND ORJIER<br />
WHEREFORE, defendant, Treadwell Corporation, hereby requests summary judgment in<br />
the above entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules 8 3212, dismissing plaintiffs’<br />
complaint against defendant, Treadwell Corporation, with prejudice in this action, and there<br />
being no opposition thereto,<br />
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against<br />
defendant, Treadwell Corporation, be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and<br />
without costs.<br />
Carol M. Tempesta, Esq.<br />
Attorney for Defendant<br />
Treadwell Corporation<br />
MCGIVNEY & KLUGER, P.C.<br />
80 Broad Street-Suite 2300<br />
New York, New York 100<strong>04</strong><br />
(212) 509-3456<br />
SO ORDEED,<br />
WEITZ & LUXENBERG, P.C.<br />
700 Broadway<br />
New York, New York 10003<br />
FILED<br />
APR 2 6 20<strong>11</strong><br />
1235e8mlY<br />
NEW YORK<br />
CLERK‘S OFFICE<br />
N0<strong>04</strong><strong>04</strong>78-1<br />
APR 15 20<strong>11</strong>
I.<br />
SUPREME COIJK'I'OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK<br />
COUNTY . OF NEW YON<br />
-I__-_I<br />
IN RE: NEW YOIU?EUTTY<br />
! NYCAL,<br />
ASBESTOS LITIGATION<br />
j I.A.S. Part 30<br />
----- j (Heitler, J.)<br />
TI IIS DOCUMENT REFERS TO:<br />
i Index No.: 101205/01<br />
FLOW ASWCRAFT, INDIVlDUALLY AND AS i<br />
PROPOSED EXECUTRIX FOR THE ESTATE i<br />
OF JAMES ASHCRAFT,<br />
[ NO OPPOSITION<br />
j SUMMARY JUDGMENT<br />
Plaintiffs, ! MOTION AND ORDER<br />
-against-<br />
A. C. & $., INC., et al.,<br />
- Defendants. /<br />
WHEREFORE, defendant, Tishan Liquidating Corp.,<br />
hereby requests summary<br />
judgment in the above entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules 6 3212, dismissing<br />
plaintiffs' complaint against defendant, Tishman Liquidating Corp,, with prejudice in this action,<br />
and there being no opposition thereto,<br />
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against<br />
defendant, Tishman Liquidating Corp., be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and<br />
without costs.<br />
Dated: New York, New York<br />
MCGIVNEY & KLUGER, P.C.<br />
80 Broad Street-Suite 2300<br />
New York, New York 100<strong>04</strong><br />
(2 12) 509-3456<br />
SO ORDERED, -<br />
c<br />
Hon. Sherry Kleir! Heitler<br />
Estate of James Ashcraft<br />
WEITZ & LUXENBERG, P.C.<br />
700 Broadway<br />
New York, New York 10003<br />
(212) 558-5500<br />
N0<strong>04</strong><strong>04</strong>74-1
SUPREME COURI’ OF THE STAI’E OF NEW YORK<br />
- COUNTY OF NEW YOKX<br />
L-<br />
IN RE: NEW YORK COIJNTY<br />
ASBESTOS LITIGATION<br />
THIS DOCUMENT REFERS TO:<br />
I- -<br />
FLOE ASHCRAFT, INDIVIDUALLY AND AS<br />
PROPOSED EXECUTRIX FOR THE ESTATE<br />
OF JAMES ASHCRAFT,<br />
Plaintiffs,<br />
: NYCAI,<br />
j I.A.S. Part 30<br />
i (Heitler, I.)<br />
i Index No.: 101 205/01<br />
j<br />
j NO OPPOSITION<br />
i SUMMARY JUDGMENT<br />
MOTION AND ORDER<br />
-against-<br />
A. C. & S., INC., et al.,<br />
Defendants. :<br />
WHEREFOW,, defendant, Patterson Pump Co., hereby requests summary judgment in<br />
the above entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules 4 3212, dismissing plaintiffs’<br />
complaint against defendant, Patterson Pump Co., with prejudice in this action, and there being<br />
no opposition thereto,<br />
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against<br />
defendant, Patterson Pump Co., be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and without<br />
costs.<br />
Dated: New York. New York<br />
Attorney for Defendant<br />
Patterson Pump Co.<br />
McGI~Y & KLUGER, P.C.<br />
80 Broad Street-Suite 2300<br />
Attorney for Plaintiffs .. -‘ -“I*<br />
Estate of James Ashcraft<br />
WEITZ & LUXENBERG, P.C.<br />
700 Broadway<br />
New xork, New York 10003<br />
\v<br />
New York, New York 100<strong>04</strong> PPR ’<br />
(212) 509-3456<br />
2 w<br />
SO ORDERED,<br />
N0<strong>04</strong><strong>04</strong>78- 1
SUPREME C'OiJK'I: 01; Tk1E STA'J'E OF NEW J'OFK<br />
_, COIIN'I'Y OF NEW YORK --<br />
IN RE: NEW YORK COUNTY<br />
NYCAL<br />
ASBESTOS LITIGATION<br />
1.A.S. Part 30<br />
-. - - (Heitler, J-)<br />
THIS DOCUMENT REFERS TO:<br />
TERRY M. KESSLER AND MARSHA<br />
KESSLER,<br />
Index No.: 1 1 9400100a6-><br />
100787/03<br />
-against-<br />
A. C. & S., NC., et a].,<br />
Plaintiffs,<br />
Defendants.<br />
NO OPPOSITION<br />
SUMMARY JUDGMENT<br />
MOTION AND OFWER<br />
WHEREFORE, defendant, Safeguard Industrial Equipment ,Co., hereby requests<br />
summary judgment in the above entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules $ 3212,<br />
dismissing plaintiffs' complaint against defendant, Safeguard Industrial Equipment Co., with<br />
prejudice in this action, and there being no opposition thereto,<br />
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against<br />
defendant, Safeguard Industrial Equipment Co., be and the same are hereby dismissed with<br />
prejudice and without costs.<br />
Attorney for Defendant<br />
Safeguard Industrial Equipment Co.<br />
MCGIVNEY & KLUGER, P.C.<br />
80 Broad Street-Suite 2300<br />
New York, New York 100<strong>04</strong><br />
(212) 509-3456<br />
SO OmERED,<br />
Carl Kroger and Carol Ann Kroger<br />
WEIT2 & LUXENBERG, P.<br />
700 Broadway<br />
IL I<br />
APA 2 6 20<strong>11</strong><br />
Hon. Sherry Klein Heitler 324-564&@! 'fc'B K<br />
COUNTY CLE8KS aWl&<br />
N0<strong>04</strong><strong>04</strong>78-1
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK<br />
COUNTY OF NEW YOKK<br />
IN RE: NEW YORK COUNTY<br />
i NYCAL<br />
ASBESTOS LITIGATION<br />
j I.A.S. Part 30<br />
i (Heitler, J.)<br />
'THIS DOCUMENT REFERS TO:<br />
i Index No.: <strong>11</strong>9400/06-?)<br />
TERRY M. KESSLER AND MARSHA<br />
1007&7/03<br />
KESSLER,<br />
-against-<br />
A. C. & S., INC., et al.,<br />
Plaintiffs,<br />
Defendants.<br />
i NO OPPOSITION<br />
j SUMMARY JUDGMENT<br />
[ MOTION AND ORDER<br />
j<br />
WHEREFORE, defendant, Tishman Liquidating Corp., hereby requests summary<br />
judgment in the above entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules 5 3212, dismissing<br />
plaintiffs' complaint against defendant, Tishman Liquidating Corp., with prejudice in this action,<br />
and there being no opposition thereto,<br />
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against<br />
defendant, Tishman Liquidating Corp., be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and<br />
without costs.<br />
Dated: New York New York<br />
MCGIVNEY & KLUGER, P.C.<br />
80 Broad Street-Suite 2300<br />
New York, New New York, New York 10003<br />
(2 12) 509-3456<br />
so ORDERED,<br />
APf8 2 6 2OTF<br />
NEW YORK<br />
2 kLERK'S OFFtCE<br />
N0<strong>04</strong><strong>04</strong>78-1
~<br />
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK<br />
COUNTY OF NEW YOIX<br />
---<br />
IN RE: NEW YORK COUNTY<br />
i NYCAL<br />
ASBESTOS LITIGATION<br />
i I.A.S. Part 30<br />
\ (Heitler, J.)<br />
THIS DOCUMENT REFERS *so:<br />
Index No.: <strong>11</strong>9400/00,6=><br />
'TERRY M. KESSLER AND MARSHA 100787/03<br />
KESSLER,<br />
-against-<br />
Plaintiffs, i NO OPPOSITION<br />
[ SUMMARY JUDGMENT<br />
! MOTION AND ORDER<br />
A. C. & S., WC., et al.,<br />
- Defendants. t<br />
WHEREFORJ?, defendant, Treadwell Corporation, hereby requests summary juhgrnent <strong>11</strong>1<br />
the above entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules 5 3212, dismissing plaintiffs'<br />
complaint against defendant, Treadwell Corporation, with prejudice in this action, and there<br />
being no opposition thereto,<br />
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against<br />
defendant, Treadwell Corporation, be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and<br />
without costs.<br />
Dated: New York, New York<br />
'<br />
'<br />
Carol M. Ternpesta, Esq.<br />
Attorney for Defendant<br />
Treadwell Corporation<br />
MCGIWEY & UUGER, P.C.<br />
80 Broad Street-Suite 2300<br />
New York, New York 100<strong>04</strong><br />
(212) 509-3456<br />
700 Broadway<br />
New York, New York 10003
SUPREME coun OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK<br />
COUNlY OF NEW YON<br />
1N RE: NEW YORK COUNTY<br />
! NYCAL<br />
ASBESTOS LITIGATION<br />
I I.A.Y. Part 30<br />
(Heitler, J.)<br />
-A_"-.-<br />
THIS IIOCIJMENT RGKS m:<br />
ROSA M. MATTE, INDIVIDUALLY AND<br />
EXECUTRIX FOR THE ESTATE OF JOSEPH<br />
MATTE,<br />
-against-<br />
A. C. & S., INC., etul.,<br />
Plaintiffs,<br />
Index No.: 102 125/01<br />
NO OPPOSITION<br />
SUMMARY JUDGMENT<br />
MOTION AND ORDER<br />
--<br />
Defendants. :<br />
WHEREFORE, defendant, Treadwell Corporation, hereby requests summary judgment in<br />
the above entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules 5 3212, dismissing plaintiffs'<br />
complaint against defendant, Treadwell Corporation, with prejudice in this action, and there<br />
being no opposition thereto,<br />
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against<br />
defendant, Treadwell Corporation, be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and<br />
without costs.<br />
Dated: New York New York<br />
q/l ,20<strong>11</strong><br />
Attorney for Defendant<br />
Treadwell Corporation<br />
MCG~VNEY & KLUGER, P.C.<br />
80 Broad Street-Suite 2300<br />
New York, New York 100<strong>04</strong><br />
(212) 509-3456<br />
N0<strong>04</strong><strong>04</strong>78-I<br />
APR 1520<strong>11</strong>
_--I---__-<br />
SUPREME C‘OURI’OFT~IE STATE OFNEWYORK<br />
COUNTY OF NEW YORK<br />
-_I_cL<br />
IN RE: NEW YOKK COUNTY<br />
: NYCAI,<br />
ASBESTOS LITIGATION<br />
i I.A.S. Part 30<br />
-A<br />
-<br />
j (Heitler, J.)<br />
1’IJIS DOCUMENT FEFEXS TO:<br />
i Index No.: <strong>11</strong>938310&-)<br />
ANN LATTANZIO, INDIVIDUALLY AND AS<br />
107623/06<br />
PERSONAL REPRESENTATIVE FOR THE<br />
ESTATE OF GIOVANNI LATTANZIO,<br />
-against-<br />
A. C. & S., INC., et al.,<br />
Plaintiffs,<br />
NO OPPOSITION<br />
SUMMARY JUDGMENT<br />
MOTION AND ORDER<br />
-<br />
Defendants.<br />
i<br />
WHEREFORE, defendant, Oakfabco, Inc., hereby requests summary judgment in the<br />
above entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules 5 3212, dismissing plaintiffs’<br />
complaint against defendant, Oakfabco, Inc,, WW prejudice in this action, and there being no<br />
opposition thereto,<br />
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against<br />
defendant, Oakfabco, Inc., be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and without<br />
costs.<br />
Dated: New York, New York<br />
.1 I! ,20<strong>11</strong><br />
Robert Darish, Esq.<br />
Attorney for Defendant<br />
Oakfabco, Inc.<br />
MCGWNEY & KLUGER, P.C.<br />
SO Broad Street-Suite 2300<br />
New York, New York 100<br />
(2 12) 509-3456<br />
WEITZ & LUXENBERG, P.C.<br />
*”’<br />
700 Broadway<br />
York 10003 LPR 2 6<br />
SO ORDERED,<br />
N0<strong>04</strong><strong>04</strong>74-1
SIJI'REME COURT OF THE S7'ATE OF NEW YOKK<br />
COUNTY OF NEW YORK<br />
! NYCAL<br />
ASBESTOS LITIGATION<br />
i I.A.S. Part 30<br />
d j (Heitler, J.)<br />
nrIs DOCUMENT REFERS TO:<br />
i Index No.: <strong>11</strong>9383100-<br />
ANN LATTANZIO, INDIVIDUALLY AND AS<br />
107623/06<br />
PERSONAL REPRESENTATIVE FOR THE<br />
ESTATE OF GIOVANNI LATTANZXO,<br />
"-<br />
N RE: NEW YON couN'ry<br />
-against-<br />
A. C. & S., INC., et al.,<br />
i NO OPPOSITION<br />
Plain tiffs, j SUMMARY JUDGMENT<br />
i MOTION AND ORDER<br />
Defendants.<br />
j<br />
WHEREFORE, defendant, Treadwell Corporation, hereby requests summary judgment in<br />
the above entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules 5 3212, dismissing plaintiffs'<br />
complaint against defendant, Treadwell Corporation, with prejudice in this action, and there<br />
being no opposition thereto,<br />
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against<br />
defendant, Treadwell Corporation, be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and<br />
without costs.<br />
Dated: New York, New York<br />
4/\ ,20<strong>11</strong><br />
Carol M. Ternpesta,\Esq.<br />
Attorney for Defendant<br />
Treadwell Corporation<br />
MCGIVNEY & KLUGER, P.C.<br />
80 Broad Street-Suite 2300<br />
New York, New York 100<strong>04</strong><br />
(212) 509-3456 /$#{ ;t t'i 7y-7<br />
p, 1 r: ,' 'I-'.,: J-<br />
CWr+Pise;LERKS OFFICE'<br />
.I\<br />
N0<strong>04</strong><strong>04</strong>78-1<br />
APR 1520<strong>11</strong>
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK<br />
COUNTY OF NEW YORK<br />
_1___________________l______l______r____------""----""-----------<br />
IN RE: NEW YORK CITY ASBESTOS LITIGATION<br />
_____________1______"-----------"-------------_-----------~------<br />
This Document Relates To:<br />
CARL KROGER and CAROL ANN KROGER,<br />
A.C. & S., INC., et al.,<br />
Plaintiff(s),<br />
-against-<br />
Defendants.<br />
X<br />
X<br />
* NYCAL<br />
1.A.S. Part 30<br />
: (Hon. Sherry Klein Heitler)<br />
' Index No.: 102314-01<br />
: NO-OPPOSITION SUMMARY<br />
' JUDGMENT MOTION AND<br />
: ORDER<br />
WHEREFORE, defendant CRANE CO. hereby requests summary judgment in the<br />
above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212, dismissing<br />
plaintiffs' complaint against defendant CRANE CO. with prejudice, and there being no<br />
opposition thereto,<br />
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against<br />
defendant CRANE CO. be, and the same are hereby, dismissed with prejudice and without costs,<br />
Dated:<br />
3 \3 e/\/<br />
Attorneys for Plaintiff(s)<br />
700 Broadway<br />
New Y ork, NY 10003<br />
(212) 558-5500<br />
599 Lexington Avenue<br />
(2 12) 536-3900<br />
SO ORDERED,<br />
Hon. Sherry Klein Heitler
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YOU<br />
COUNTY OF NEW YORK<br />
W RE: NEW YORK COUNTY<br />
ASBESTOS LITIGATION<br />
I<br />
THIS DOCUMENT REFERS TO:<br />
ANTHONY MODAFFERI,<br />
4<br />
NYCAL<br />
I.A.S. Part 30<br />
(Heitler, J.)<br />
Index No.: 1 1 93 80/00 0<br />
102720/<br />
-against-<br />
A. C. & S., INC-, et al.,<br />
Plaintiffs, j NO OPPOSITION<br />
j SUMMARY JUDGMENT<br />
i MOTION ANI) ORDER<br />
Defendants. \<br />
WHEREFORE, defendant, Treadwell Corporation, hereby requests summary judgment in<br />
the above entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules 8 3212, dismissing plaintiffs'<br />
complaint against defendant, Treadwell Corporation, with prejudice in this action, and there<br />
being no opposition thereto,<br />
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against<br />
defendant, Treadwell Corporation, be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and<br />
without costs.<br />
Dated: New York, New York<br />
d/\ ,20<strong>11</strong><br />
Carol M. Ternpesta, Esq.<br />
Attorney for Defendant<br />
Treadwell Corporation<br />
MCGIVNEY & KLUGER, P.C.<br />
80 Broad Street-Suite 2300<br />
New York, New York 1000<br />
(212) 509-3456<br />
SO ORDERED,<br />
Anthony Modaffei<br />
WEITZ & LUXENBERG, P.C.<br />
York, New Y ork 10003<br />
12<br />
c<br />
kLbl
SIJPKEME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YOEX<br />
COUNTY --. "-- OF NEW YORK<br />
.-<br />
IN RE: NEW YOKK COUNTY<br />
! NYCAL<br />
ASBESTOS 1,<strong>11</strong>'1GATION I I.A.S. Part 30<br />
" j (Heitler, J.)<br />
THIS DOCUMENT REFERS TO:<br />
i Index No.: 103007/01<br />
EUGENE DEGANNES AND JACQUE1,NE<br />
DEGANNES,<br />
i NO OPPOSITION<br />
Plaintiffs, j SUMMARY JUDGMENT<br />
j MOTION AND ORDER<br />
-against-<br />
A. C. & S., INC., et al.,<br />
Defendants. !<br />
WHEREFORE, defendant, Courter & Company, Inc., hereby requests summary<br />
judgment in the above entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules 6 3212, dismissing<br />
plaintiffs' complaint against defendant, Courter & Company, Inc., with prejudice in this action,<br />
and there being no opposition thereto,<br />
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against<br />
defendant, Courter & Company, Inc., be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and<br />
without costs.<br />
Dated: New Yo&, New York<br />
Attorney for Defendant<br />
Courter & Company, Inc.<br />
MCGXVNEY & KLUGER, P.C.<br />
80 Broad Street-Suite 2300<br />
New Y ork, New Y ork 100<strong>04</strong><br />
(212) 509-3456<br />
Eugene Degannes and<br />
WEITZ & LUXENBERG, P.C.<br />
700 Broadway<br />
SO ORDERED,<br />
NOM<strong>04</strong>78- 1
___A-<br />
WPKEME COURT OF TIE S'I'ATE OF NEW YOKK<br />
ASBESTOS LI'I'IGA'1'ION<br />
THIS DOCUMENT REFERS TO:<br />
_.-_--<br />
EUGENE DEGANNES ANI1 JACQUELlNE<br />
DEGANNES,<br />
-against-<br />
Plaintiffs,<br />
i I.A.S. Part 30<br />
i (Heitler, J,)<br />
j Index No.: 103007/01<br />
! NO OPPOSITION<br />
i SUMMARY JUDGMENT<br />
; MOTION AND ORDER<br />
A. C. & S., INC., et al.,<br />
--_-<br />
Defendants.<br />
j<br />
WHEREFORE, defendant, Patterson Pump Co., hereby requests summary judgment i<br />
the above entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules 5 3212, dismissing plaintiffs'<br />
complaint against defendant, Patterson Pump Co., with prejudice in this action, and there being<br />
no opposition thereto,<br />
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against<br />
defendant, Patterson Pump Co., be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and without<br />
costs.<br />
Patterson Pump Co.<br />
MCGlWY & KLUGER, P.C.<br />
80 Broad Street-Suite 2300<br />
New York, New York 100<strong>04</strong><br />
(212) 509-3456<br />
SO ORDERED,<br />
Attorney for Plainti<br />
Eugene Degannes and Jacqueline Degannes<br />
WElTZ & LUXENBERG, P.C.<br />
700 Broadway<br />
bpR 2 6 20<strong>11</strong><br />
454-9572 NEVJ YORK<br />
'.<br />
N0<strong>04</strong><strong>04</strong>78-1<br />
sall
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK<br />
-- CO‘IJNTY OF NEW YORK<br />
IN RE: NEW YOKK COUNTY<br />
i NYCAL<br />
ASBESTOS LITlGATTON<br />
i I.A.S. Part 30<br />
i (Heitler, 1.)<br />
THIS DOCUMENT REFERS TO:<br />
i Index No.: 103007/01<br />
EUGENE DEGANNES AND JACQUELINE<br />
DEGANNES,<br />
i NO OPPOSITION<br />
Plaintiffs,<br />
i SUMMARY JUDGMENT<br />
j MOTION AND ORDER<br />
-against-<br />
A. C. & S., INC., et al.,<br />
Defendants.<br />
i<br />
WHEREFORE, defendant, Treadwell Corporation, hereby requests summar! judgment in<br />
the above entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules 5 3212, dismissing plaintiffs’<br />
complaint against defendant, Treadwell Corporation, with prejudice in this action, and there<br />
being no opposition thereto,<br />
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against<br />
defendant, Treadwell Corporation, be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and<br />
without costs.<br />
Dated: New York, New York<br />
?/I , 201 1<br />
LdLaL<br />
Carol M. Tempesta, Esq.<br />
Attorney for Defendant<br />
Treadwell Corporation<br />
Eugene Degannes and Jacqueline Degannes<br />
MCGIVNEY & KLUGER, P.C.<br />
WEITZ & LUXENBERG, P.C.<br />
80 Broad Street-Suite 2300<br />
700 Broadway ;.<br />
New York, New York 100<strong>04</strong> New York, New York I O O e r’ Y*?<br />
(212) 509-3456 I*; A 8. ” I-i<br />
SO ORDERED, 2 6 20<strong>11</strong><br />
J 235-2549<br />
NEW yC.IflK<br />
COUNTY CLERK‘S OFFICE<br />
N0<strong>04</strong><strong>04</strong>78-1
I<br />
SUPREME COIJKI OF THE STATE OF NEW YON<br />
COUNTY - OF NEW YORK -----<br />
IN RE: NEW YON COUNTY<br />
ASBESTOS LITIGATION<br />
THIS DOCUMENT REFERS rro:<br />
-<br />
EUGENE DEGANNES AND JACQUELINE<br />
DEGANNES,<br />
-against-<br />
Plaintiffs,<br />
NYCAI,<br />
I.A.S. Part 30<br />
(Heitler, J.)<br />
Index No.: 103007/01<br />
NO OPPOSITION<br />
SUMMARY JUDGMENT<br />
MOTION AND OWER<br />
A. C. & S., INC., eta!.,<br />
Defendants.<br />
WHEREFORE, defendant, Tishman Liquidating Corp., hereby requests summary<br />
judgment in the above entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules 5 3212, dismissing<br />
plaintiffs' complaint against defendant, Tishan Liquidating Corp., with prejudice in this action,<br />
and there being no opposition thereto,<br />
ORDEW,D, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against<br />
defendant, Tishman Liquidating Corp., be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and<br />
without costs.<br />
80 Broad Street-Suite 2300<br />
New York, New York 1000<br />
(21 2) 509-3456<br />
SO ORDERED,<br />
Eugene Degannes and Jacqueline Degann$<br />
WEITZ & LUXENBERG, P.C.<br />
700 Broadway<br />
New York, New York IOOF<br />
2383-<strong>26</strong>37J.<br />
1 L E D<br />
APR 2 6 20<strong>11</strong><br />
141-<strong>11</strong>1 YORK<br />
CO~N r't' CLERK'S OFFICE<br />
NOMO474- I
-__I<br />
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK<br />
COUNTY OF NEW YON<br />
IN RE: NEW YORK COUNTY<br />
! NYCAL<br />
ASBESTOS LITIGATION I I.A.S. Part 30<br />
! (Heitler, J.)<br />
THIS DOCUMENT EFERS TO:<br />
j Index No.: 1036<strong>11</strong>/01<br />
MARY J. MARlEN, INDIVIDUALLY AND AS [<br />
EXECUTRIX FOR THE ESTATE OF WILLIAM i<br />
C. MARTIN, : NO OPPOSITION<br />
j SUMMARY JUDGMENT<br />
Plaintiffs, i MOTION AND ORDER<br />
-against-<br />
A. C. & S., INC., et al.,<br />
~-~<br />
Defendants. ;<br />
WHEREFORE, defendant, Treadwell Corporation, hereby requests summary judgment in<br />
the above entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules § 3212, dismissing plaintiffs'<br />
complaint against defendant, Treadwell Corporation, with prejudice in this action, and there<br />
being no opposition thereto,<br />
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against<br />
defendant, Treadwell Corporation, be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and<br />
without costs.<br />
Y<br />
Carol M. Tempesta, Esq.<br />
Attorney for Defendant<br />
Treadwell Corporation<br />
MCG~VNEY & KLUGER, P.C.<br />
80 Broad Street-Suite 2300<br />
New York, New York 100<strong>04</strong><br />
WEITZ & LUXENBERG, P.C<br />
700 Broadway<br />
New York, New York 10003<br />
(212) 509-3456 (212) 558-5500<br />
SO ORDERED,<br />
Hon. Sher? Khdn Heitler<br />
%&&i&X7<br />
~ P 2 R 6 20<strong>11</strong><br />
b!EW YORK<br />
CLERK'S OFFICE'
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK<br />
COUNTY OF NEW YORK<br />
IN RE: NEW YORK CITY<br />
ASBESTOS LITIGATION<br />
This Document Relates to:<br />
MARY MARTIN, Individually and as Proposed<br />
Executrix for the Estate of WILLIAM C. MARTIN,<br />
I.A.S. Part 30<br />
(Heitler, J.)<br />
INDEX NO.: 01 -1 0361 1<br />
NO OPPOSITION<br />
SUMMARY JUDGMENT<br />
MOTION AND ORDER<br />
against<br />
A. C. AND S., INC., et ai.<br />
WHEREFORE, defendant, Kohler Co., hereby requests summary judgment in the<br />
3bove-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212, dismissing plaintiffs'<br />
:omplaint against defendant, Kohler Co., with prejudice, and there being no opposition thereto,<br />
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against<br />
lefendant, Kohler Co., be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and without costs.<br />
3ATED:<br />
New York, New York<br />
31 W <strong>11</strong><br />
ESQ.<br />
Y L 7'.<br />
;TEFHAkflEy BAKER, ESQ.<br />
MICHAEL FA~LLI,<br />
iOAGLAND, LONGO, MORAN<br />
WElTZ & LUXENBERG<br />
IUNST & DOUKAS, LLP<br />
Attorneys for Plaintiff (s),<br />
ittorneys for Defendant,<br />
Mary Martin, Individually and as Proposed<br />
Lohler Co.<br />
Executrix for the Estate of William C. Martin<br />
0 Paterson Street - PO Box 480<br />
700 Broadway<br />
lew Brunswick, New Jersey 08903 New York, NY 10,003 ,<br />
10 ORDERED:
-<br />
SUPREME c0uK-r OF THE STATE OF NEW YOKK<br />
COUNTY OF NEW YOKK<br />
IN RE: NEW YORK COUNTY j NYCAX,<br />
ASBESTOS LITIGATION<br />
j I.A.S. Part 30<br />
j (Heitler, J-)<br />
THIS DOCUMENT EEm-<br />
MARY MAKTTN, INDIVIDUALLY AND<br />
PROPOSED EXEC1JTR.IX FOR THE ESTATE<br />
OF WILLIAM C. MARTIN,<br />
P 1 ain ti ffs ,<br />
: Index No.: 10361 1/01<br />
i NO OPPOSITION<br />
i SUMMARY JUDGMENT<br />
j MOTION AND ORDER<br />
-against-<br />
A. C. & S., INC., et al.,<br />
Defendants.<br />
i<br />
WHEREFORE, defendant, Oakfabco, Inc., hereby requests summary judgment in the<br />
above entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules 5 3212, dismissing plaintiffs’<br />
complaint against defendant, Oakfabco, Inc., with prejudice in this action, and there being no<br />
opposition thereto,<br />
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against<br />
defendant, Oakfabco, Inc., be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and without<br />
costs.<br />
Dated: New York, New York<br />
,201 1<br />
Rabert Darish, Esq.<br />
Attorney for Defendant<br />
Oakfabco, Inc.<br />
Estate of William C. Ma<br />
MCGIVNEY & KLUGER, P.C.<br />
WEITZ & LUXENBERG, P.C.<br />
80 Broad Street-Suite 2300<br />
700 Broadway<br />
New York, New York 100<strong>04</strong> New York, New York 10003<br />
(2 I 2) 509-3456 (212) 558-5500<br />
VJEVJ<br />
FF\cE:<br />
SO ORDERED,<br />
Hon. Sherry Kleh Heitler 2571-0745<br />
N0<strong>04</strong><strong>04</strong>74- I
SUPREME COUR7 OF TFIE STATE OF NEW YOICK<br />
COUNTY OF NEW YOKK<br />
IN RE: NEW YORK comw<br />
NY C A I,<br />
ASBESTOS LlTlGATION<br />
I.A.S. Part 30<br />
(Heitler, J.)<br />
THIS DOCUMENT REFERS TO:<br />
ELEANOR F. HAKES, 1NDlVIDUALLY AND<br />
AS PERSONAL REPRESENTATIVE FOR THE<br />
ESTATE OF WlLLIAM V. HAKES <strong>11</strong>1,<br />
-against-<br />
A. C. & S., INC., et nL,<br />
Plaintiffs,<br />
Index No.: 103870/01<br />
NO OPPOSITION<br />
SlJMMARY JUDGMENT<br />
MOTION AND ORDER<br />
--<br />
Defendants.<br />
WHEREFORE, defendant, Tishman Liquidating Corp.,<br />
hereby requests summary<br />
judgment in the above entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules 5 3212, dismissing<br />
plaintiffs’ complaint against defendant, Tishman Liquidating Corp., with prejudice in this action,<br />
and there being no opposition thereto,<br />
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against<br />
defendant, Tishman Liquidating Cop, be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and<br />
without costs.<br />
80 Broad Street-Suite 2300<br />
New York, New Y ork 100<strong>04</strong><br />
(212) 509-3456<br />
Estate of William V. Hakes,<br />
WErTz & LUXENBERG, P.C.<br />
700 Broadway<br />
New York, New York I0003<br />
APR 2 6 20<strong>11</strong><br />
SO ORDERED,<br />
~;EW YORK<br />
zBaup CLERKS OFFICE<br />
N0<strong>04</strong><strong>04</strong>74- I
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YOIiK<br />
COUNTY OF NEW YOKK<br />
IN E: NEW YORK COUNTY<br />
ASBESTOS LITIGATION<br />
THIS DOCUMENT REFERS TO:<br />
ELEANOR F. HAKES, INDIVIDUALLY AND<br />
AS PERSONAL R.EPRESENTATIVE FOR THE<br />
ESTATE OF WILLIAM V. HAKES, <strong>11</strong>1,<br />
-against-<br />
Plaintiffs,<br />
NY CAL<br />
I.A.S. Part 30<br />
(Hei tler, J.)<br />
hdex No.: 103870/01<br />
NO OPPOSITION<br />
SUMMARY JUDGMENT<br />
j MOTION AND ORDER<br />
I<br />
A. C. & S., INC., et ul.,<br />
Defendants. :<br />
WHEREFORE, defendant, Treadwell Corporation, hereby requests summary judgment in<br />
the above entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules 9 3212, dismissing plaintiffs'<br />
complaint against defendant, Treadwell Corporation, with prejudice in this action, and there<br />
being no opposition thereto,<br />
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against<br />
defendant, Treadwell Corporation, be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and<br />
without costs.<br />
Dated: New York. New York<br />
Attorney for Defendant<br />
Treadwell Corporation<br />
MCGIVNEY & UUGER, P.C.<br />
80 Broad Street-Suite 2300<br />
New York, New York 10<br />
(212) 509-3456<br />
SO ORDERED,<br />
Estate of William V. Hakes, I1<br />
WEITZ & LUXENBERG, P.C.<br />
700 Broadway<br />
New York, New York 10003<br />
123<br />
A@R 2 6 ?OE"<br />
\.lE!Al "ORK<br />
D<br />
#FI=
SUPREME: coum- OF THE sTAm OF NEW YORK<br />
COUNTY OF NEW YOKK<br />
IN RE: NEW YORK COUNTY<br />
”-. ---__<br />
i<br />
NYCAL<br />
ELEANOR F. HAKES, INDIVISUALLY AND<br />
PROPOSED REPRESENTATIVE FOR THE<br />
ESTATE OF WILLIAM V. HAKES, <strong>11</strong>1,<br />
-against-<br />
ASBESTOS LITIGATION j I.A.S. Part 30<br />
‘rrm DOCUMENT REFERS TO-<br />
i (Hcitler, J.)<br />
j Index No.: 103870/01<br />
i<br />
/ NO OPPOSITION<br />
i SUMMARY JUDGMENT<br />
Plaintiffs, j MOTION AND ORDER<br />
-.-<br />
A. C. & S., INC., et al.,<br />
Defendants.<br />
i<br />
WHEREFORE, defendant, Patterson Pump Co., here by requests summary judgment in<br />
the above entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules 0 3212, dismissing plaintiffs’<br />
complaint against defendant, Patterson Pump Co., with prejudice in this action, and there being<br />
no opposition thereto,<br />
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against<br />
defendant, Patterson Pump Co., be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and without<br />
costs.<br />
Dated: New York. New York<br />
Patterson Pump Co.<br />
MCGWY & KLUGER, P.C.<br />
80 Broad Street-Suite 2300<br />
New York, New York 100<strong>04</strong><br />
(2 12) 509-3456<br />
SO ORDERED,<br />
Estate of William V. Hakes, I<strong>11</strong><br />
WERZ & LUXENBERG, P.C.<br />
700 Broadway<br />
New York, New York 10003<br />
58-5500 APR 2 6 2Q“<br />
y0FiK<br />
Hon. Sherry Klein Heitler 454-<strong>04</strong>60 CLERKS<br />
COUNTY<br />
N0<strong>04</strong><strong>04</strong>78-I
~~<br />
SUPREME COURT OF THE S’I‘A‘TE OF NEW YOKK<br />
COUNTY OF NEW YORK<br />
IN RE: NEW YOKK COUNTY f NYCAL<br />
ASBESTOS LITIGATION<br />
i I.A.S. Part 30<br />
- ~ - -! (Heitler, J.)<br />
THlS DOCUMENT REFERS TO:<br />
ELEANOR F. HAKES, INDIVISUALLY AND<br />
PROPOSED REPRE,SENTATlVE FOR THE<br />
ESTATE OF WILLIAM V. HAKES, <strong>11</strong>1,<br />
-against-<br />
A. C. & S., INC., et al.,<br />
Plaintiffs,<br />
j Index No.: 103870/01<br />
j<br />
NO OPPOSITION<br />
j SUMMARY JUDGMENT<br />
i MOTION AND ORDER<br />
Defendants. ;<br />
WHEREFORE, defendant, Safeguard Industrial Equipment Co., hereby requests<br />
summary judgment in the above entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules 4 3212,<br />
dismissing plaintiffs’ complaint against defendant, Safeguard Industrial Equipment Co., with<br />
prejudice in this action, and there being no opposition thereto,<br />
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against<br />
defendant, Safeguard Industrial Equipment Co., be and the same are hereby dismissed with<br />
prejudice and without costs.<br />
Attorney for Defendant<br />
Safeguard Industrial Equipment Co.<br />
MCGIVNEY & KLUGER, P.C.<br />
80 Broad Street-Suite 2300<br />
New York, New York 100<strong>04</strong><br />
(2 12) 509-3456<br />
Estate of William V. Hakes,<br />
WEITZ & LUXENBERG, P.C.<br />
700 Broadway<br />
New York, New York 10003 ,pR 2 6 2015<br />
N”,W YORK<br />
OFF^^<br />
SO ORDERED, 7<br />
TY c E ~ ~ ~<br />
Hon. Sherry Klein Heitler<br />
3%!ldv<br />
N0<strong>04</strong><strong>04</strong>78-1
. ~ ~ I<br />
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK<br />
COUNTY OF NEW YORK<br />
_._- - ~ I<br />
IN RE: NEW YORK COUNTY<br />
i NYCAL<br />
ASBESTOS LITlGATION t I.A.S. Part 30<br />
--<br />
i (Heitler, 3.)<br />
THIS DOCUMENT REFERS TO:<br />
j Index No.: 103986/01<br />
AMELIA PARKER, INDIVIDUALLY AND AS I<br />
EXECUTRIX FOR THE ESTATE OF RICHARD i<br />
PARKER;<br />
NO OPPOSITION<br />
i SUMMARY JUDGMENT<br />
Plaintiffs, MOTION AND ORDER<br />
-against-<br />
A. C. & S., INC., etal.,<br />
Defendants.<br />
WHEREFORE!, defendant, Treadwell Corporation, hereby requests summary judgment in<br />
the above entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules 5 3212, dismissing plaintiffs’<br />
complaint against defendant, Treadwell Corporation, with prejudice in this action, and there<br />
being no opposition thereto,<br />
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against<br />
defendant, Treadwell Corporation, be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and<br />
without costs.<br />
Attorney for Defendant<br />
Treadwell Corporation ,<br />
MCGIVNEY & KLUGER, P.C.<br />
WEITZ & LUXENBERG, P.C.<br />
80 Broad Street-Suite 2300<br />
700 Broadway<br />
New York, New York 100<strong>04</strong> New York, New York 10003 APR ””<br />
(212) 509-3456 (212) 558-5500<br />
NEW YORK<br />
CLERK‘S OFF\CE<br />
SO ORDERED,<br />
cowfl<br />
1235-0803<br />
N0<strong>04</strong><strong>04</strong>78-1<br />
APR 15 20<strong>11</strong>
FRANK LUIS1 and HELEN LUISI,<br />
Plaintiffs,<br />
NYCAL<br />
I.A.S. Part 30<br />
Hon. Sherry Klein<br />
0<br />
Heitler, J.S.C.<br />
IndexNo.:<br />
1<strong>04</strong>0<strong>11</strong>-2<br />
NO OPPOSITION SUMMARY JUDGMENT<br />
MOTION AND ORDER<br />
WHEREFORE, defendant FOSTER WHEELER, L.L.C. (sued herein as "FOSTER WHEELER<br />
CORPORATION") hereby request summary judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil<br />
Practice Law and Rules Section 3212, dismissing plaintiffs' complaint against defendant FOSTER<br />
WHEELER, L.L.C, with prejudice, and there being no opposition thereto,<br />
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims-against defendant<br />
FOSTER WHEELER, L.L.C. be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and without costs.<br />
Weitz & Luxenberg, P.C.<br />
Attorney for Plain tvfs<br />
700 Broadway<br />
New York, New York 100<br />
Sedgwick, Detert, Moran & Arnold, LLP<br />
Attorneys for Foster Wheeler, 1. L.C.<br />
Three Gateway Center, 12th Floor<br />
Newark, NJ 07102<br />
50 ORDERED,<br />
-- '<br />
NJ/34 I760v 1
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK<br />
- COUNTY OF NEW YORK<br />
IN RE: NEW YORK COUNTY<br />
i NYCAL<br />
ASBESTOS LITIGATION<br />
j I.A.S. Part 30<br />
i (Heitler, J.)<br />
0<br />
THIS DOCUMENT REFERS TO:<br />
j Index No.: <strong>11</strong>9382/0 <strong>04</strong>033/01<br />
CLARA M. LIGAMMARE, INDIVIDUALLY /<br />
AND AS EXECUTRIX FOR THE ESTATE OF I<br />
LAWRENCE LIGAMMARE, / NO OPPOSITION<br />
j SUMMARY JUDGMENT<br />
Plaintiffs, j MOTION AND ORDER<br />
-against-<br />
A. C. & S., INC., et al.,<br />
Defendants.<br />
j<br />
WHEREFORE, defendant, Treadwell Corporation, hereby requests summary judgment in<br />
the above entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules 5 3212, dismissing plaintiffs'<br />
complaint against defendant, Treadwell Corporation, with prejudice in this action, and there<br />
being no opposition thereto,<br />
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against<br />
defendant, Treadwell Corporation, be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and<br />
without costs.<br />
Dated: New Y rk, New York<br />
.S! ,20<strong>11</strong><br />
4 MLde<br />
Carol M. Tempesta, Esq.<br />
Attorney for Defendant<br />
Treadwell Corporation<br />
MCGIVNEY & KUJGER, P.C.<br />
80 Broad Street-Suite 2300<br />
New York, New York 100<strong>04</strong><br />
(212) 509-3456<br />
SO ORDERED,<br />
Estate of Lawrence Liga<br />
WEITZ & LUXENBERG, P.<br />
700 Broadway<br />
New York, New York 10003 APE 2 6 20<strong>11</strong><br />
t.@JG YORK<br />
GLERti'S OFFtCk<br />
w % o<br />
N0<strong>04</strong><strong>04</strong>78-I<br />
k-,: L<br />
6 15Zfi<strong>11</strong>I
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK<br />
COUNTY OF NEW YORK<br />
IN RE: NEW YORK CITY<br />
ASBESTOS LITIGATION<br />
This Document Relates to:<br />
RANDEE KATLIN and WILLIAM L. GOLDMAN, as<br />
Co-Executors for the Estate of REUBEN W.<br />
GOLDMAN,<br />
I.A.S. Part 30<br />
(Heitler, J.)<br />
INDEX NO.: 01-1<strong>04</strong>560<br />
NO OPPOSITION<br />
SUMMARY JUDGMENT<br />
MOTION AND ORDER<br />
against<br />
A. C. AND S.. INC.. et al.<br />
WHEREFORE, defendant, Kohler Co., hereby requests summary judgment in the<br />
above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212, dismissing<br />
plaintiffs' complaint against defendant, Kohler Co., with prejudice, and there being no<br />
opposition thereto,<br />
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against<br />
defendant, Kohler Co., be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and without<br />
costs.<br />
DATED: New York, New York<br />
FILED<br />
APR 2 6 20<strong>11</strong><br />
HOAGLAFID, LONQO<br />
WAN, WNST 8<br />
DOUKAS, LLP<br />
ATTORNEYS AT LAW<br />
NORTH JERSEY<br />
40 PATERSON ST<br />
PO BOX rlao<br />
W BRUNSWICK, NJ<br />
SOUTH mSEY<br />
7M MTSEY'S MILL RD<br />
SUITE 202<br />
HAMONTON, NJ<br />
iOAGLAND, LONGO, MORAN<br />
NNST & DOUKAS, LLP<br />
4ttor neys for Defendant ,<br />
(ohler Co.<br />
40 Paterson Street - PO Box 480<br />
\lew Brunswick, New Jersey 08903<br />
$0 ORDERED:<br />
PAAN ALVARADO, ESQ.<br />
WElTZ & LUXENBERG<br />
Attorneys far Plaintiff (s),<br />
Randee Katlin and William L. Goldman as<br />
Co-Executors for the Estate of Reuben W.<br />
Goldman<br />
700 Broadway<br />
Hon. Sherry Klein Heitler
__I----<br />
SIJPREME COURT OF TH&@&TE<br />
"1. OF<br />
COUNTY OF NEW YORK<br />
.-I-~<br />
IN RE: NEW YORK COUNTY<br />
ASBESTOS 1,l'I'IGA'TION<br />
THIS DOCUMENT REFERS m:<br />
NEW YORK<br />
j NYCAL<br />
j I.A.S. Part 30<br />
(Heitler, J.><br />
i IndexNo.: 1<strong>04</strong>561/01<br />
CAROLE S. NICASTRO, AS<br />
ADMMIS'TRATRIX FOR THE ESTATE OF<br />
DENXS F. NICASTRO AND CAROLE S.<br />
! NO OPPOSITION<br />
NICASTRO, i SUMMARY JUDGMENT<br />
i MOTION AND OFtDER<br />
Plaintiffs,<br />
-against-<br />
A. C. & S., INC., et al.,<br />
Defendants. /<br />
i<br />
WHEREFORE, defendant, Treadwell Corporation, hereby requests summary judgment in<br />
the above entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules 8 3212, dismissing plaintiffs'<br />
complaint against defendant, Treadwell Corporation, with prejudice in this action, and there<br />
being no opposition thereto,<br />
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against<br />
defendant, Treadwell Corporation, be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and<br />
without costs.<br />
Dated: New York, New York<br />
201 1<br />
n,n<br />
Attorney for Defendant<br />
Treadwell Corporation<br />
MCGXVNEY & KLUGER, P.C.<br />
80 Broad Street-Suite 2300<br />
New York. New York 100<strong>04</strong><br />
(2 12) 509-3456<br />
SO ORDERED,<br />
Attorney for Plaintiffs<br />
Estate of Denis F. Nicastro<br />
WEITZ & LUXENBERG, P.C.<br />
FII<br />
700 Broadway APR 2 6 20<strong>11</strong><br />
NEW YWIK<br />
COUNTY CLERKS UFF1Ct<br />
1235- 1909<br />
N0<strong>04</strong><strong>04</strong>78-I<br />
I<br />
I
_I<br />
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK<br />
COUNTY OF NEW YORK<br />
_7-1_1-._-_L --<br />
m RE: NEW YORK com-ry<br />
ASBESTOS 1,ITIGATION<br />
__I-<br />
THIS DOCUMENT-ERS<br />
TO:<br />
CAROLE S. NICASTRO, AS<br />
ADMINISTRATRIX FOR THE ESTATE OF<br />
DENIS F. NICASTRO AND CAROLE S.<br />
NICASTRO,<br />
-against-<br />
A. C. & S., mC., et al.,<br />
Plaintiffs,<br />
-<br />
NYCAL<br />
I.A.S. Part 30<br />
(Heitler, J.)<br />
Index No.: 1<strong>04</strong>561/01<br />
NO OPPOSITION<br />
SUMMARY JUDGMENT<br />
MOTION AND ORDER<br />
Defendants.<br />
WHEREFORE, defendant, Oakfabco, Inc., hereby requests summary judgment in the<br />
above entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules 8 3212, dismissing plaintiffs’<br />
complaint against defendant, Oakfabco, Inc., with prejudice in this action, and there being no<br />
opposition thereto,<br />
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against<br />
defendant, Oakfabco, Inc., be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and without<br />
costs.<br />
Dated: New York, New York<br />
Darish, Esq.<br />
Attorney for Defendant<br />
Oakfabco, Inc.<br />
MCGIVNEY & KLUGER, P.C.<br />
80 Broad Street-Suite 2300<br />
New York, New York 100<strong>04</strong><br />
(212) 509-3456<br />
SO ORDERED,<br />
Fgm-4M-W= “.G :\<br />
Attorney for Plaintiffs<br />
Estate of Denis F. Nicastro F 1 L<br />
E<br />
WEITZ & LUXENBERG, P.C.<br />
700 Broadway<br />
New York,New York 10003 APR 2 6 20<strong>11</strong><br />
r , ~ u ~<br />
2571 -0749<br />
p:EW YORK<br />
1 ‘ CLERK‘S ~ OFFICE<br />
N0<strong>04</strong><strong>04</strong>74-1
I<br />
SUPREME COURT OF THE S'I'ATE OF NEW YORK<br />
_" COUNJ<br />
____.___<br />
Y OF NEW<br />
- __ YOKK -<br />
IN RE: NEW YORK COUNTY<br />
NYCXL<br />
I.A.S. Part 30<br />
--- _- -.<br />
.-<br />
(Heitler, J -><br />
THE DOCUMENT REFERS TO:<br />
ELOISE IIALL, INDIVIDUALLY AND AS<br />
ADMJNISIRATRIX FOK THE ESTATE RUFUS<br />
HALL,<br />
P tainti ffs,<br />
Index No.: 1<strong>04</strong>563/01<br />
NO OPPOSITION<br />
SUMMARY JUDGMENT<br />
MOTION AND ORDER<br />
-against-<br />
A. C. & S., INC., et al.,<br />
-<br />
Defendants.<br />
WHEREFORE, defendant, Safeguard Industrial Equipment Co., hereby requests<br />
summary judgment in the above entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules fj 3212,<br />
dismissing plaintiffs' complaint against defendant, Safeguard Industrial Equipment Co., with<br />
prejudice in this action, and there being no opposition thereto,<br />
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against<br />
defendant, Safeguard Industrial Equipment Co., be and the same are hereby dismissed with<br />
prejudice and without costs.<br />
P<br />
f 9 K h. o&b,E~.<br />
Attorney for Plaintiffs<br />
Safeguard Industrial Equipment Co.<br />
Estate Rufus Hall<br />
MCGIVNEY & UUGER, P.C.<br />
WEITZ & LUXENBERG,<br />
F*<br />
80 Broad Street-Suite 2300<br />
700Broadway<br />
New York, New York 100<strong>04</strong> New York, New York 10003<br />
(212) 509-3456<br />
SO ORDERED,<br />
I L E D<br />
APR 2 6 20<strong>11</strong><br />
3 2 W YaRK<br />
COUNTY CLERK'S OFFICE'<br />
N0<strong>04</strong><strong>04</strong>78-1
SUYRLME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW Y ORK<br />
."--__-<strong>11</strong>_<br />
COUNTY OF NEW YORK -__. _-- --<br />
IN E: NEW YORK COUNTY<br />
NYCAL<br />
ASBESTOS LITIGA'TION<br />
1.A.S. hrt 30<br />
(Heiller, 3.)<br />
THIS DOCUMENTREFERS TO:<br />
ELOISE HALL, 1NDlVIDUALLY AND AS<br />
ADMlNISTRA'rRIX FOR THE ESTATE RUFUS<br />
HALL,<br />
-against-<br />
A. C. & S., NC., et a].,<br />
--<br />
Plaintiffs,<br />
Defendants.<br />
Index No.: 1.<strong>04</strong>563/01<br />
NO OPPOSITION<br />
SUMMARY JUDGMENT<br />
NOTION AND OFWER<br />
WHEREFORE, defendant, Patterson Pump Co., hereby requests summary judgment in<br />
the above Entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules 5 3212, dismissing plaintiffs'<br />
complaint against defendant, Patterson Pump Co., with prejudice in this action, and there being<br />
no opposition thereto,<br />
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against<br />
defendant, Patterson Pump Co., be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and without<br />
costs.<br />
MCGlVNEY & KLUGER, P.C.<br />
80 Broad Street-Suite 2300<br />
New York, New York 100<strong>04</strong><br />
(212) 509-3456<br />
SO ORDERED,<br />
Attorney for Plainti<br />
Estate Rufus Hall<br />
WEITZ & LUXENBERG, P.C.<br />
700 Broadway<br />
NewYork,NewY rk 1 0<br />
F I'Am E 63<br />
COWN~<br />
APR 2.6$ 20<strong>11</strong><br />
P4 ?%% R K<br />
GERK'S OFFICE^<br />
330<strong>04</strong><strong>04</strong>78-3
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE C)F NEW YORK<br />
- COUNTY OF NEW YORK<br />
IN RE: NEW YORK COUNTY<br />
! NYCAL<br />
ASBESTOS LITIGATION j I.A.S. Part 30<br />
i (Eleitler, J.)<br />
THIS DOCUMENT REFERS TO:<br />
j Index No.: 1<strong>04</strong>563/01<br />
ELOISE HALL, INDIVIDUALLY AND AS<br />
ADMINISTRATRIX FOR THE ESTATE RUFUS j<br />
HALL, i NO OPPOSITION<br />
j SUMMARY JUDGMENT<br />
Plaintiffs, : MOTION ANI) 0XU)ER<br />
-against-<br />
A. C. & S., INC7 et al.,<br />
Defendants.<br />
WHEREFORE, defendant, Treadwell Corporation, hereby requests summary judgment in<br />
the above entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules 4 3212, dismissing plaintiffs'<br />
complaint against defendant, Treadwell Corporation, with prejudice in this action, and there<br />
being no opposition thereto,<br />
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against<br />
defendant, Treadwell Corporation, be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and<br />
without costs.<br />
Attorney for Defendant<br />
Treadwell Corporation<br />
Estate Rufus Hall<br />
MCGIVNEY & KLUGER, P.C.<br />
80 Broad Street-Suite 2300<br />
WEITZ & LUXENBERG, P.C.<br />
700 Broadway<br />
Y York 100<strong>04</strong> New Y ork, New York 10003<br />
AFR 2 6 20<strong>11</strong><br />
Hon. Sherry -Klein Heitler
_I_- Defendants.<br />
_-I___<br />
SlJPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW Y ORK<br />
- COUNTY .- OF NEW YORK<br />
I.I_- -.”-<br />
IN RE: NEW YORK COUNTY<br />
i NYCAL<br />
ASBESTOS LITIGATION<br />
j I.A.S. Part 30<br />
_-<br />
! (Heitler, J.)<br />
THIS DOCUMEN-FERS TO:<br />
j Index No.: 1<strong>04</strong>563/01<br />
ELOISE HALL, INLIIVIDUALLY AND AS<br />
ADMINISTRATRIX FOR THE ESTATE OF<br />
RUFUS HALL, / NO OPPOSITION<br />
i SUMMARY JUDGMENT<br />
Plaintiffs,<br />
j MOTION AND ORDER<br />
-against-<br />
A. C. & S., INC., et al.,<br />
\<br />
WHEREFORE, defendant, Tishman Liquidating Coy., hereby requests summary<br />
judgment in the above entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules 6 3212, dismissing<br />
plaintiffs’ complaint against defendant, Tishman Liquidating Corp., with prejudice in this action,<br />
and there being no opposition thereto,<br />
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against<br />
defendant, Tishman Liquidating Corp., be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and<br />
without costs.<br />
MCGIVNEY & KLUGER, P.C.<br />
80 Broad Street-Suite 2300<br />
New York, New York 100<strong>04</strong><br />
(212) 509-3456<br />
SO ORDERE<br />
WEXTZ & LUXENBERG, P.C.<br />
700 Broadway<br />
&R 2 6 20<strong>11</strong><br />
New York, New York IO0<br />
1\IE\nJ YOFZK<br />
COuNn CLERKS OFFICE’<br />
2383-22764<br />
N0<strong>04</strong><strong>04</strong>74-1
SUPREME COUIIl OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK<br />
- COUNl’Y OF NEW YON<br />
IN RE: NEW YORK COUNTY<br />
i NYCAI,<br />
ASBESTOS LITIGATION<br />
j J.A.S. Part 30<br />
.I - d ! (Heitler, J.)<br />
THIS DOCUMENT REFERS TO:<br />
JOHN J. ROSATI, AS EXECUTOR FOR THE<br />
ESTATE OF JAMES V. ROSATI,<br />
-against-<br />
A. C. & S., INC., et a/.,<br />
i Index No.: 1<strong>04</strong>696/01<br />
!<br />
NO OPPOSITION<br />
Plaintiffs, j SUMMARY JUDGMENT<br />
j MOTION AND ORDER<br />
- --<br />
Defendants.<br />
j<br />
WHEREFORE, defendant, Oakfabco, lnc., hereby requests summary judgment in the<br />
above entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules 5 3212, dismissing plaintiffs’<br />
complaint against defendant, Oakfabco, Inc., with prejudice in this action, and there being no<br />
opposition thereto,<br />
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against<br />
defendant, Oakfabco, Inc., be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and without<br />
costs.<br />
Dated: New York, New York<br />
q(! ,20<strong>11</strong><br />
h<br />
Robert Darish, Esq.<br />
Attorney for Defendant<br />
Oakfabco, Inc.<br />
MCGIVNEY & KLUGER, P.C.<br />
80 Broad Street-Suite 2300<br />
New York, New York 100<strong>04</strong><br />
(212) 509-3456<br />
SO ORDERED,<br />
e.<br />
WElTZ & LUXENBERG, P.C.<br />
700 Broadway /hYR z6<br />
New York New York 10003<br />
(212) 558-5500<br />
2571-0751<br />
zag<br />
N0<strong>04</strong><strong>04</strong>74-1
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK<br />
COUNTY OF NEW YORK<br />
IN RE: NEW YORK COUNTY<br />
i NYCAL<br />
ASBESTOS LITIGATION<br />
i I.A.S. Part 30<br />
i (Heitler, J.)<br />
THIS DOCUMENT REFERS TO:<br />
i Index No.: 1<strong>04</strong>696/01<br />
JOHN J. ROSATI, AS EXECUTOR FOR THE<br />
ESTATE OF JAMES V. ROSATI,<br />
NO OPPOSITION<br />
Plaintiffs, i SUMMARY JUDGMENT<br />
MOTION AND ORDER<br />
-against-<br />
A. C. & S., INC., et al.,<br />
Defendants.<br />
i<br />
WHEREFORE, defendant, Safeguard Industrial Equipment Co., hereby r,,-ests<br />
summary judgment in the above entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules 8 3212,<br />
dismissing plaintiffs’ complaint against defendant, Safeguard Industrial Equipment Co., with<br />
prejudice in this action, and there being no opposition thereto,<br />
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against<br />
defendant, Safeguard Industrial Equipment Co., be and the same are hereby dismissed with<br />
prejudice and without costs.<br />
Safeguard Industrial Equipment Co.<br />
MCGIVNEY & KLUGER, P.C.<br />
80 Broad Street-Suite 2300<br />
New York, New York 100<strong>04</strong><br />
(212) 509-3456<br />
SO ORDERED,<br />
Hon. Sherry Jdein Heitler<br />
Estate of James V, Rosati<br />
WEITZ & LUXENBERG, P.C.<br />
700 Broadway<br />
New York, New York 10003<br />
-*% -!<br />
%’<br />
FILED<br />
APR 2 6 20<strong>11</strong><br />
EW YORK<br />
N0<strong>04</strong>Q478-1
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK<br />
COUNlY OF NEW YORK<br />
IN RE: NEW YON COUNTY i NYCAL<br />
ASBESTOS LITIGATION f I.A.S. Part 30<br />
d ! OIeitler, J.)<br />
THIS DOCUMENT REFERS pro:<br />
j Index No.: 1<strong>04</strong>696/01<br />
JOHN J. ROSATI, AS EXECUTOR FOR THE<br />
ESTATE OF JAMES V. ROSATX,<br />
\ NO OPPOSITION<br />
Plaintiffs, i SUMMARY JUDGMENT<br />
/ MOTION AND ORDER<br />
-against-<br />
A. C. & S., INC., et al.,<br />
Defendants. j I<br />
WHEREFORE, defendant, Treadwell Corporation, hereby requests summary judgment in<br />
the above entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Q 3212, dismissing plaintiffs'<br />
complaint against defendant, Treadwell Corporation, with prejudice in this action, and there<br />
being no opposition thereto,<br />
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against<br />
defendant, Treadwell Corporation, be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and<br />
without costs.<br />
Dated: New York, Wew York<br />
Carol M. Ternpesta, Esq?<br />
Attorney for Defendant<br />
Treadwell Corporation<br />
MCGNNEY & KLUGER, P.C.<br />
80 Broad Street-Suite 2300<br />
New York, New York 100<strong>04</strong><br />
(212) 509-3456<br />
SO ORDERED,<br />
P-v Y I ,<br />
Lttome9or P<br />
Estate of James V. Rosati<br />
WEITZ & LUXENBERG, P.C.<br />
700 Broadway<br />
APR 2 6 20''
SUPREME CO1JRT OF 'TIE S'I'ATF OF NEW YORK<br />
ASBES'I'OS LITIGA'X'ION i I.A.S. Part 30<br />
.,- -------<br />
THIS DOCUMENl REFERS TO:<br />
! (Hcitler, J.)<br />
1<br />
j Index No.: 1<strong>04</strong>982/01<br />
ROBERT B. GAGLJARDO AND BARBARA<br />
GAGLIARDO,<br />
-against-<br />
Plaintiffs,<br />
NO OPPOSITION<br />
i SUMMARY JUDGMENT<br />
j MOTION AND ORDER<br />
A. C. & S., INC., et al.,<br />
Defendants.<br />
i<br />
WHEREFORE, defendant, Tishman Liquidating Corp., hereby requests summary<br />
judgment in the above entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules $ 3212, dismissing<br />
plaintiffs' complaint against defendant, Tishman Liquidating Corp., with prejudice in this action,<br />
and there being no opposition thereto,<br />
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against<br />
defendant, Tishman Liquidating Corp., be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and<br />
without costs.<br />
MCGNNEY & KLWGER, P.C.<br />
80 Broad Street-Suite 2300<br />
New York, New York 100<strong>04</strong><br />
(212) 509-3454<br />
SO ORDERED,<br />
WEITZ & LUXENBERG. P.C.<br />
700 Broadway<br />
New York, New York 10003<br />
2383-2272<br />
A&?<br />
23 mt<br />
N0<strong>04</strong><strong>04</strong>74-1
SIJPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK<br />
~- COUNTY OF NEW YORK<br />
IN KE: NEW YORK COUNTY<br />
j NYCAL<br />
ASBESTOS LITIGATION<br />
j 1.A.S. Part 30<br />
! (Heitler, 1.)<br />
THIS DOCUMENT REFERS TO:<br />
_-<br />
j Index No.: 1<strong>04</strong>982/01<br />
ROBERT B. GAGLIARDO AND BARBARA<br />
GAGLIARDO,<br />
NO OPPOSITION<br />
Plaintiffs, j SUMMARY JUDGMENT<br />
i MOTION AND ORDER<br />
-against-<br />
A. C. & S., INC., et al.,<br />
j<br />
Defendants. - i<br />
WHEREFOE, defendant, Treadwell Corporation, hereby requests summary judgment in<br />
the above entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules 5 3212, dismissing plaintiffs'<br />
complaint against defendant, Treadwell Corporation, with prejudice in this action, and there<br />
being no opposition thereto,<br />
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against<br />
defendant, Treadwell Corporation, be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and<br />
without costs.<br />
Dated: New Yo k, New York<br />
d, ,20<strong>11</strong><br />
J?yb.dJ&/w>j . J<br />
Carol M. Tempesta, Esq.<br />
Attorney for Defendant<br />
Treadwell Corporation<br />
P-<br />
Robert B. Gagliardo and Bar<br />
WElTZ & LUXENBERG, P.C.<br />
700 Broadway<br />
MCGIVNEY & KLUGER, P.C.<br />
80 Broad Street-Suite 2300<br />
New York, New York 100<strong>04</strong> New York, New York 10003<br />
(212) 509-3456 (212) 558-5500<br />
SO ORDERED,<br />
APK 2 6 20<strong>11</strong><br />
NEW YORK<br />
CLERK'S OFFICE<br />
N0<strong>04</strong><strong>04</strong>78-1
_cI<br />
SlJPKEME COURT OF THE S1’Al’E OF NEW YOKK<br />
ASBESTOS LITIGATION j I.A.S. Part 30<br />
I (Heitler. J.)<br />
--A‘ I ,<br />
TMJS DOCUMENT REFERS TO:<br />
i Index No.: 1<strong>04</strong>982/01<br />
ROBERT B. GAGLIARDO AND BAmARA i<br />
GAGLIARDO,<br />
NO OPPOSITJON<br />
Plaintiffs, j SUMMARY JUDGMENT<br />
j MOTION AND ORDER<br />
-against-<br />
A. C. & S., NC., et ul,,<br />
--<br />
Defendants. i<br />
WHEREFORE, defendant, Courter & Company, Inc., hereby request<br />
summary<br />
judgment in the above entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules 8 3212, dismissing<br />
plaintiffs’ complaint against defendant, Courter & Company, Inc., with prejudice in this action,<br />
and there being no opposition thereto,<br />
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against<br />
defendant, Courter & Company, Inc., be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and<br />
without costs.<br />
Attorney for Defendant<br />
Attorney for Plaintiffs<br />
Courter & Company, Inc.<br />
MCGlWY & KLUGER, P.C.<br />
WEITZ & LUXENBERG, P.C.<br />
80 Broad Street-Suite 2300<br />
700 Broadway<br />
New York, New York 100<strong>04</strong><br />
NewYork,NewYork10003 APR 2 6 20<strong>11</strong><br />
(212) 509-3456 (7.12) 558-5500<br />
SO ORDERED,<br />
Robert B. Gagliardo and B FiGkiaE D<br />
NEW YORK<br />
COUNTY CLERK‘S OFFICJ$<br />
<strong>11</strong>22-12564<br />
N0<strong>04</strong><strong>04</strong>78-1
~ -._-<br />
SUPREME COlJRT OF THE STAI’E OF NEW YORK<br />
COIJNTY OF NEW - YORK ---<br />
IN E: NEW YOKK COUNTY i NYCAL,<br />
AS HESTOS LIT1 GAT1 ON<br />
i I.A.S. Part 30<br />
i (Heitler, J.)<br />
r ,<br />
THIS DOCUMENT REFERS TO:<br />
i Index No.: 1<strong>04</strong>982/01<br />
ROBERT B. GAGLIARDO AND BARBARA<br />
f<br />
GAGLIARDO,<br />
NO OPPOSITION<br />
Plaintiffs,<br />
i SUMMARY JUDGMENT<br />
[ MOTION AND ORDER<br />
-against-<br />
” .--_<br />
A. C. & S., INC., et al.,<br />
Defendants. - i<br />
WHEREFORE, defendant, Patterson Pump Co., hereby requests summary idgmmt in<br />
the above entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules tj 3212, dismissing plaintiffs’<br />
complaint against defendant, Patterson Pump Co., with prejudice in this action, and there being<br />
no opposition thereto,<br />
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against<br />
rlA~--~,,n+ Patterson Pump Co., be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and without<br />
costs.<br />
York, New York
I<br />
SIJPKEME couu OF THE STATE OF NEW YOKK<br />
COUNTY ..-- OF "_- NEW YON<br />
-_--<br />
IN RE: NEW YORK COUNTY<br />
i NYCAL<br />
A SBES'T'OS LITIGATION i 1.A.S. Part 30<br />
i (Eieitler, J.)<br />
-<br />
.<br />
THIS DOCUMENT REFERS TO:<br />
/ Index No.: 1<strong>04</strong>982/01<br />
ROBERT B. GAGLIARDO AND BAEU3ARn<br />
i<br />
GAGE1 AKDO,<br />
! NO OPPOSITION<br />
Plaintiffs,<br />
i SUMMARY JUDGMENT<br />
; MOTION AND ORDER<br />
-against-<br />
-.<br />
A. C. & S., NC., et af.,<br />
Defendants.<br />
I<br />
W€3EREFORE, defendant, Safeguard Industrial Equipment Co., hereby<br />
:q1 :sts<br />
I summary judgment-in the above entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules tj 3212,<br />
dismissing plaintiffs' complaint against defendant, Safeguard Industrial Equipment Co., with<br />
prejudice in this action, and there being no opposition thereto,<br />
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against<br />
defendant, Safeguard Industrial Equipment Co., be and the same are hereby dismissed with<br />
prejudice and without costs.<br />
Safeguard Industrial Equipment Co.<br />
MCG~WJEY & UUGER, P.C.<br />
80 Broad Street-Suite 2300<br />
New York, New York 100<strong>04</strong><br />
(212) 509-3456<br />
Robert B. Gagliardo and Barbara Gagliardo<br />
WEITZ & LUXENBERG, P.C.<br />
700 Broadway<br />
New Y ork, New Y ork 1 Ow3 9<br />
(212) 558-5500
SUPREME COUR'T OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK<br />
COUNTY OF NEW YORK<br />
IN RE: NEW YORK cowry<br />
I_<br />
ASBESTOS LITIGATION<br />
THIS DOCUMENT REFERS TO:<br />
FRANCIS 3. LANGAN AND ELIZABETH M.<br />
LANGAN,<br />
-against-<br />
A. C. & S., INC., et al.,<br />
! NYCAL<br />
i I.A.S. Part 30<br />
i (Heitler, J.)<br />
i Index No.: 1<strong>04</strong>997/0 1<br />
i<br />
\ NO OPPOSITION<br />
Plaintiffs, j SUMMARY JUDGMENT<br />
i MOTION AND ORDER<br />
Defendants.<br />
i<br />
WHEREFORE, defendant, Treadwell Corporation, hereby requests summary judgment in<br />
the above entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules 5 3212, dismissing plaintiffs'<br />
complaint against defendant, Treadwell Corporation, with prejudice in this action, and there<br />
being no opposition thereto,<br />
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against<br />
defendant, Treadwell Corporation, be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and<br />
without costs.<br />
Attorney for Defendant<br />
Treadwell Corporation<br />
MCGIVNEY & KLUGER, P.C.<br />
80 Broad Street-Suite 2300<br />
New York, New York 100<strong>04</strong><br />
(21 2) 509-3456<br />
WEITZ & LUXENBERG, P.C.<br />
700 Broadway<br />
New York, New York 10003<br />
bpi{ 2 6 2<strong>04</strong>1<br />
SO ORDERED,<br />
1235-6986 couNn<br />
p$hY \;OM<br />
CLERK'S OFFICE<br />
N0<strong>04</strong><strong>04</strong>78-1
SIJPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YOKK<br />
comw OF NEW YON<br />
---- ----<br />
IN I=:<br />
NEW YORK COUNT7<br />
ASBESTOS LITIGATION<br />
-r HI s DOC~ JMXT-KEFERS TO :<br />
-.<br />
----<br />
JOHN PAUL KEITH AND DOROTHY KEITH,<br />
! NYCAI,<br />
j I.A.S. Part 30<br />
i (Heitler, J.)<br />
j Index No.: 105230/01<br />
!<br />
-against-<br />
A. C. & S., INC., et ai.,<br />
Plain tiffs,<br />
Defendants.<br />
! NO OPPOSITION<br />
j SUMMARY JUDGMENT<br />
j MOTION AND ORDER<br />
i<br />
WHEREFORE, defendant, Patterson Pump Co., hereby requests summary judgment in<br />
the above entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules § 3212, dismissing plaintiffs'<br />
complaint against defendant, Patterson Pump Co., with prejudice in this action, and there being<br />
no opposition thereto,<br />
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against<br />
defendant, Patterson Pump Co., be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and without<br />
costs.<br />
Dated: New York. New York<br />
Patterson Pump Co.<br />
MCGIVNEY & KLUGER, P.C.<br />
80 Broad Street-Suite 2300<br />
New York, New York 100<strong>04</strong><br />
(212) 509-3456<br />
SO ORDERED,<br />
John Paul Keith and Dorothy Keith<br />
WElTZ & LUXENBERG, P.C.<br />
FILED<br />
APR 2 6 2 W<br />
NO<strong>04</strong><strong>04</strong>78-1
(2<br />
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK<br />
COUNTY OF NEW YORK<br />
JOHN PAUL KEITH and DOROTHY KEITH,<br />
A.C. & S., INC., et a].,<br />
Plaintiff(s),<br />
: NYCAL<br />
: I.A.S. Part 30<br />
: (Hon. Sherry Klein Heitler)<br />
-against-<br />
: Index No.: 105230-01<br />
Defendants.<br />
NO-OPPOSITION SUMMARY<br />
JUDGMENT MOTION AND<br />
: ORDER<br />
WHEREFORE, defendant CRANE CO. hereby requests summary judgment in the<br />
above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212, dismissing<br />
plaintiffs' complaint against defendant CRANE CO. with prejudice, and there being no<br />
opposition thereto,<br />
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against<br />
defendant CRANE CO. be, and the same are hereby, dismissed with prejudice and without costs.<br />
Dated: '3 \? =\ (\<br />
Attorneys for Plaintiff(s)<br />
700 Broadway CRANE CO.<br />
New York, NY 10003 599LexingtonAvenue APR 2 6 20<strong>11</strong><br />
(212) 558-5500<br />
New York, NY 10022<br />
--"+_. ~ 12) 536-3900 NEW YORK<br />
r.ouN1~ CLERKS OFF'=<br />
SO ORDERED,<br />
Hon. Sherry Klein Heitler<br />
APR 15 20<strong>11</strong>1
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YON<br />
r~<br />
I- COUNTY OF NEW YORK<br />
RE: NEWTOM COUNTY<br />
! NYCAL<br />
ASBESTOS LITIGATION<br />
j I.A.S. Part 30<br />
i (Heitler, J.)<br />
THIS DOCUMENT REFERS TO:<br />
j Index No.: 105252/01<br />
ELIZABETH A. WHITEHEAD, AS<br />
ADMINISTRATRIX FOR THE ESTATE OF<br />
CHARLES E. MEYERS, \ NO OPPOSITION<br />
j SUMMARY JUDGMENT<br />
Plaintiffs, MOTION AND ORDER<br />
-against-<br />
A. C. & S., INC., et al.,<br />
-.-<br />
Defendants.<br />
i<br />
WHEREFORE, defendant, Treadwell Corporation, hereby requests summary judgment in<br />
the above entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules 8 3212, dismissing plaintiffs'<br />
complaint against defendant, Treadwell Corporation, with prejudice in this action, and there<br />
being no opposition thereto,<br />
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against<br />
defendant, Treadwell Corporation, be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and<br />
without costs.<br />
F I L E Q<br />
Treadwell Corporation<br />
Estate of Charles E. Meyers<br />
MCG~VNEY & KLUGER, P.C. WEITZ&LWXENBERG,P.C.<br />
.1<br />
80 Broad Street-Suite 2300<br />
700 Broadway<br />
New York, New York 100<strong>04</strong><br />
New York, New York 10003<br />
(212) 509-3456 (212) 558-5500<br />
APR 2 6 2012<br />
SO ORDERED,<br />
123GQW<br />
PIEW YORK<br />
~y CLERK'S aFF6b<br />
N0<strong>04</strong><strong>04</strong>78-1<br />
I<br />
I<br />
1
SUPREME COlJKT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK<br />
COUNTY OF NEW YORK<br />
IN RE: NEW YORK COUNTY j NYCAL<br />
ASBESTOS LITIGATION<br />
i lAS+ Part 30<br />
A j (Heitler, J.)<br />
THIS DOCUMENT REFERST<br />
ELIZABETH A. WHITEHEAD, AS<br />
ADMINISTRATRIX FOR THE ESTATE OF<br />
CHARLES E. MEYERS,<br />
-against-<br />
A. C. & S., INC., et ul.,<br />
PI ainti ffs,<br />
j Index No.: 105252/01<br />
; NO OPPOSITION<br />
j SUMMARY JUDGMENT<br />
! MOTION AND ORDER<br />
Defendants.<br />
j<br />
WHEREFORE, defendant, Oakfabco, Inc., hereby requests summary judgment in the<br />
above entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules 5 3212, dismissing plaintiffs’<br />
complaint against defendant, Oakfabco, Inc., with prejudice in this action, and there being no<br />
opposition thereto,<br />
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against<br />
defendant, Oakfabco, Inc., be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and without<br />
costs.<br />
Dated: New Yprk, New York<br />
Attorney for Defendant<br />
Oakfabco, Inc.<br />
MCGlVNEY & KLUGER, P.C.<br />
80 Broad Street-Suite 2300<br />
New York, New York 100<strong>04</strong><br />
(212) 509-3456<br />
Estate of Charles E. Meyers<br />
WEITZ & LUXENBERG, P.C.<br />
700 Broadway<br />
SO ORDERED,<br />
N0<strong>04</strong><strong>04</strong>74-1
_I____<br />
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK<br />
COUNTY OF NEW YORK -----<br />
IN RE: NEW YORK COUNTY<br />
j NYCAL<br />
ASBESTOS LITIGATION<br />
j I.A.S. Part 30<br />
i (Heitler, J.)<br />
THIS DOCUMENT REFERS TO:<br />
SHARON B. HARVEY, INDIVIDUALLY AND<br />
ADMINISTRATRIX FOR THE ESTATE OF<br />
RICHARD L. HARVEY,<br />
-against-<br />
A. C. & S., INC., et al.,<br />
Plaintiffs,<br />
-<br />
i index No.: 105477/01<br />
i<br />
i<br />
NO OPPOSITION<br />
i SUMMARY JUDGMENT<br />
! MOTION AND ORDER<br />
Defendants.<br />
i<br />
WHEFEFORE, defendant, Treadwell Corporation, hereby requests summary judgment in<br />
the above entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules $ 3212, dismissing plaintiffs'<br />
complaint against defendant, Treadwell Corporation, with prejudice in this action, and there<br />
being no opposition thereto,<br />
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against<br />
defendant, Treadwell Corporation, be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and<br />
without costs.<br />
Dated: New Y rk, New York<br />
J! ,20<strong>11</strong><br />
1 f!AJ&Q+><br />
Carol M. Tempesta, Esq.<br />
Attorney for Defendant<br />
Treadwell Corporation<br />
MCGIWY & KLUGER, P.C.<br />
80 Broad Street-Suite 2300<br />
New York, New York 100<strong>04</strong><br />
(212) 509-3456<br />
SO ORDEED,<br />
Estate of Richard L. Harvey<br />
WEITZ & LUXENBERG, P.C.<br />
700 Broadway<br />
New York, New York 10003<br />
APR 2 6 20<strong>11</strong><br />
FILED<br />
NESJ YORK<br />
&m CLERK'S OFFICE<br />
N0<strong>04</strong><strong>04</strong>78- 1
SUPREME c0uR-r OF THE STATE OF NUW YORK<br />
COUNTY ~-~-- OF NEW -- YORK<br />
-. -._--<br />
IN RE: NEW YORK COUNTY<br />
! NYCAL<br />
ASBESTOS LITIGATION<br />
I I.A.S. Part 30<br />
i (Heitler, J.)<br />
‘THIS DOCUMEN’I’ REFERS TO:<br />
j Index No.: 105477/01<br />
FRANK KOROSECZ, AS ADMINISTRATOR !<br />
FOR THE ESTATE OF ETHEL N. KOROSECZ j<br />
AND FRANK KOROSECZ, INDIVIDUALLY, i NO OPPOSITION<br />
j SUMMARY JUDGMENT<br />
Plaintiffs, \ MOTION AND ORDER<br />
. 4<br />
-against-<br />
A. C. & S., INC., el ai.,<br />
Defendants. !<br />
WHEREFORE, defendant, Safeguard Industrial Equipment Co., hereby requests<br />
summary judgment in the above entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules 3212,<br />
dismissing plaintiffs’ complaint against defendant, Safeguard Industrial Equipment Co., with<br />
prejudice in this action, and there being no opposition thereto,<br />
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against<br />
defendant, Safeguard Industrial Equipment Co., be and the same are hereby dismissed with<br />
prejudice and without costs.<br />
FWY n.w2, E<br />
F<br />
”i.<br />
ED<br />
Attorney for Plaintiffs<br />
Safeguard Industrial Equipment Co.<br />
Estate of Ethel N. Korosec<br />
MCGXVNEY & KLUGER, P.C.<br />
WElTZ & LUXENBERG, P.C.<br />
80 Broad Street-Suite 2300<br />
700 Broadway<br />
New York, New Y ork 100<strong>04</strong> New York, New York 10003 APR 2 6 20’’<br />
N0<strong>04</strong><strong>04</strong>78- 1
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK<br />
coumy OF NEW YORK<br />
1N RE: NEW YORK COUNTY<br />
! NYCAL<br />
ASBESTOS LITIGATION<br />
j I.A.S. Part 30<br />
/ (Heitler, J.)<br />
THIS DOCUMENT REFERS TO:<br />
j Index No.: 105477/01<br />
FRANK KOROSECZ, AS ADMINISTRATOR i<br />
FOR THE ESTATE OF ETHEL N. KOROSECZ j<br />
AND FRANK KOROSECZ, INDIVIDUALLY, NO OPPOSITION<br />
i SUMMARY JUDGMENT<br />
Plaintiffs, i MOTION AND OmER<br />
-against-<br />
A. C. & S., INC., et a].,<br />
Defendants.<br />
j<br />
WHEREFORE, defendant, Treadwell Corporation, hereby requests summary judgment in<br />
the above entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules 5 3212, dismissing plaintiffs’<br />
complaint against defendant, Treadwell Corporation, with prejudice in this action, and there<br />
being no opposition thereto,<br />
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against<br />
defendant, Treadwell Corporation, be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and<br />
without costs.<br />
Dated: New Y rk, New York<br />
d, ,20<strong>11</strong><br />
~ ~~~<br />
Carol M. Ternpesta, Esq.<br />
Attorney for Defendant ~<br />
Tread we1 1 Corporation<br />
MCGIVNEY & KLUGER, P.C.<br />
WElrz & LUXENBERG, P.C.<br />
I<br />
SO Broad Street-Suite 2300<br />
700 Broadway<br />
New York, New York 100<strong>04</strong> New York, New York 10003 APR 6 20<strong>11</strong><br />
(212) 509-3456<br />
(212) 558-5500<br />
SO ORDERED,<br />
Hon. Sherry Klein Heitler<br />
p.\T$ YORK<br />
OFFGE<br />
Tu CLERKS<br />
J W M<br />
N0<strong>04</strong><strong>04</strong>78-1
This Document Relates To:<br />
NYCAL<br />
1,A.S. Part 30<br />
(Heitler, J.)<br />
NO OPPOSITION SUMMARY<br />
JUDGMENT MOTION AND<br />
ORDER<br />
-<br />
Index No.:%5885/2001 )<br />
106037/200 1<br />
WHEREFORE, defendant SEQUOIA VENTURES NC. f/k/a BECHTEL CORP.,<br />
hereby requests summary judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law anc<br />
Rules Section 32 12, dismissing plaintiffs complaint against defendant SEQUOIA VENTURES<br />
INC. f/Wa BECHTEL CORP., with prejudice, and there being no opposition thereto,<br />
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against<br />
defendant SEQUOIA VENTURES INC. f/Wa BECHTEL CORP., be and the same are hereby<br />
dismissed with prejudice and without costs.<br />
Dated: New York, New York<br />
FILED<br />
WILENTZ, GOLDMAN & SPITZER<br />
RSI BALLAINE & FORD P.C.<br />
NEW YORK<br />
<strong>11</strong>0 William Street, <strong>26</strong>th Floor<br />
New York, New York 10038-3901<br />
(212) <strong>26</strong>7-3828<br />
Attorneys for Defendant<br />
SEQUOIA VENTURES INC.<br />
f/Wa BECHTEL CORP.<br />
120 Broadway, 27th Floor<br />
New York, New York 10271 -0079<br />
(212) 238-4800<br />
So Ordered:<br />
.::ODMA/PCDOCS/DOCSNY/5 15750/1<br />
APR 13 20<strong>11</strong> '
NYCAL<br />
I.A.S. Part 30<br />
(Heitler, J.)<br />
This Document Relates To:<br />
NO OPPOSITION SUMMARY<br />
JUDGMENT MOTION AND<br />
ORDER<br />
WHEREFORE, defendant SEQUOIA VENTURES INC, fMa BECHTEL CORP.,<br />
hereby requests summary judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and<br />
Rules Section 3212, dismissing plaintiffs complaint against defendant SEQUOIA VENTURES<br />
INC. fMa BECHTEL CORP., with prejudice, and there being no opposition thereto,<br />
. ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against<br />
defendant SEQUOIA VENTURES INC, fMa BECHTEL CORP., be and the same are hereby<br />
dismissed with prejudice and without costs,<br />
Dated: New York, New York<br />
E D*<br />
WILENTZ, GOLDMAN & SPITZER<br />
J~NDM~%?QRSI BALLAINE & FORD P.C.<br />
1 10 William Street, <strong>26</strong>th Floor<br />
New York, New York 10038-390 1<br />
(212) <strong>26</strong>7-3828<br />
C-S. Kozak<br />
Attorneys for Defendant<br />
SEQUOIA VENTURES INC.<br />
f/k/a BECHTEL COW.<br />
120 Broadway, 27th Floor<br />
New York, New York 10271 -0079<br />
(212) 238-4800<br />
_"_*~,"._,l,.." __. *,.,* I..X,..<br />
SO Ordered:<br />
Hon. Sherry Kl&n Heitler<br />
.::ODMA/PCDOCS/DOCSNY/S 15750/1
SlJPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK<br />
- COUNTY OF NEW YORK -<br />
cc_<br />
1N RE: NEW YORK COUNTY<br />
i NYCAL<br />
ASBESTOS LITlGATION<br />
f T.A.S. Part 30<br />
-- i (Heitler, J.)<br />
0<br />
THIS DOCUMENT REFERS TO:<br />
1 IndexNo.: <strong>11</strong>9385 0,106463/01<br />
SALVATORE RANDAZZO AND RHODA<br />
RANIIAZZO,<br />
j NO OPPOSITION<br />
Plaintiffs, j SUMMARY JUDGMENT<br />
i MOTION AND ORDER<br />
-against-<br />
A. C. & S., INC., et ab,<br />
Defendants. !<br />
WHEREFORE, defendant, Treadwell Corporation, hereby requests summary Jdgment<br />
the above entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules 5 3212, dismissing plaintiffs'<br />
complaint against defendant, Treadwell Corporation, with prejudice in this action, and there<br />
being no opposition thereto,<br />
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against<br />
defendant, Treadwell Corporation, be and the sake are hereby dismissed with prejudice and<br />
without costs.<br />
Attorney for Defendant<br />
Treadwell Corporation<br />
Salvatore Randazzo and Rhoda Rand=>'<br />
MCGWEY & UUGER, P.C. WElTZ&LUXENBERG,P.C. w q f:;i>:<br />
80 Broad Street-Suite 2300 700 Broadway I; - $ . ,a i d "<br />
New York, New York 100<strong>04</strong><br />
(212) 509-3456<br />
SO ORDERED,<br />
New York, New York 10003<br />
/,pi< 2 6 20<strong>11</strong><br />
f 0 j, 'I'f-JRK<br />
123515342.<br />
cOUN~-~ C;~EBK:'SFF~CE~<br />
N0<strong>04</strong><strong>04</strong>78-1
I<br />
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK<br />
COUNTY OF NEW YORK<br />
IN RENEW YORK COUNTY i NYCAL<br />
ASBESTOS LITIGATION<br />
i I.A.S. Part 30<br />
A i (Heitlex, J.)<br />
THIS DOCUMENT REFERS TO:<br />
ANNE M. REILLER, INDIVIDUALLY AND AS<br />
EXECUTRIX FOR THE ESTATE OF<br />
ANTHONY JOHN REILLER,<br />
Plaintiffs,<br />
j Index No.: 106642/01<br />
NO OPPOSITION<br />
SUMMARY JUDGMENT<br />
MOTION AND 0RX)ER<br />
-against-<br />
A. C. & S., INC., etal.,<br />
Defendants.<br />
WHEREFORE, defendant, Treadwell Corporation, hereby requests summary judgment in<br />
the above entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules 5 3212, dismissing plaintiffs'<br />
complaint against defendant, Treadwell Corporation, with prejudice in this action, and there<br />
being no opposition thereto,<br />
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against<br />
defendant, Treadwell Corporation, be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and<br />
without costs.<br />
Treadwel I Corporation Estate of Anthony John Reille D<br />
MCF~VNEY & KLUGER, P.C.<br />
WEITZ & LUXENBERE, P.C.<br />
80 Broad Street-Suite 2300<br />
700 Broadway<br />
New York, New York 100<strong>04</strong><br />
York,NewYork 10003 APR 2 6 20<strong>11</strong><br />
(212) 509-3456<br />
F\'IFW VORK<br />
SO ORDERED,<br />
COUNN CLERK'S OFFICE<br />
1235-0923<br />
N0<strong>04</strong><strong>04</strong>78-1
SlJYKEME COURT OF THE STAI’E OF NEW YON<br />
COUNTY OF NEW YORK<br />
^-<br />
1N RE: NEW YORK C0IhJl.Y<br />
I NYCAI,<br />
ASBESTOS 1,ITIGATlON j X.A.S. Part 30<br />
: (Heitler, J.)<br />
THIS DOCUMENT REFERS TO:<br />
i Index No.: 1 O6642/01<br />
ANNE M. REILLER, INDIVIDUALLY AND AS i<br />
EXECUTRIX FOR ‘THE ESTATE OF<br />
ANTHONY JOHN REILLER, i NO OPPOSITION<br />
f SUMMARY JUDGMENT<br />
Plaintiffs, i MOTION AND ORDER<br />
-against-<br />
A. C. & S., INC., et nl.,<br />
Defendants. [<br />
WHEEFORE, defendant, Oakfabco, Inc., hereby requests summary judgment in the<br />
above entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules 8 3212, dismissing plaintiffs’<br />
complaint against defendant, Oakfabco, Inc., with prejudice in this action, and there being no<br />
opposition thereto,<br />
ORDERED, that upon notice to all eo-defendants, all claims and cross claims against<br />
defendant, Oakfabco, Inc., be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and without<br />
costs.<br />
Dated: New York, New York<br />
,201 1<br />
Robert Darish, Esq.<br />
Attorney for Defendant<br />
Oakfabco, Inc.<br />
MCGIVNEY & KLUGER, P.c.<br />
80 Broad Street-Suite 2300<br />
New York, New York I00<strong>04</strong><br />
(212) 509-3456<br />
SO ORDERED,<br />
Estate of Anthony John Rl<br />
WElTZ & LUXENE~ERG, P.C.<br />
700 Broadway<br />
New York, New York 10003 APR 2 6 20”<br />
(212) 558-5500<br />
NEW WRK<br />
cauNN CLERKS OFF“‘<br />
I<br />
257 J -0750<br />
N0<strong>04</strong><strong>04</strong>74-1 APK 15 20<strong>11</strong>
S1JYREiME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK<br />
- COIJN'I'Y OF NEW YORK<br />
1N RE: NEW YORK COUNTY<br />
ASBESTOS LITXGATlON<br />
THIS D O C U ~ FEFERS T<br />
TO:<br />
CAROL ANN KELLY AS EXECUTRIX FOR<br />
THE ESTATE OF LAWRENCE J. KELLY AND<br />
CAROL ANN KELLY, INDIVIDUALLY,<br />
-against-<br />
A. C. & S., INC., et al.,<br />
Plaintiffs,<br />
Defendants.<br />
NYCAL<br />
J.A.S. Part 30<br />
(Heitler, J.><br />
Index No.: 106643/01<br />
NO OPPOSITION<br />
SUMMARY JUDGMENT<br />
MOTION AND ORDER<br />
WHEREFORE, defendant, Tishman Liquidating Corp., hereby requests summary<br />
judgment in the above entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules 9 3212, dismissing<br />
plaintiffs' complaint against defendant, Tishman Liquidating C op, with prejudice in this action,<br />
and there being no opposition thereto,<br />
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against<br />
defendant, Tishman Liquidating Cop, be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and<br />
without costs.<br />
in & LUXENBERG, P.C.<br />
80 Broad Street-Suite 2300<br />
700 Broadway<br />
New Y ork, New York 1000 rk,NewYork 10003 APR 2 6 20<strong>11</strong><br />
(212) 509-3456<br />
NEW YORK<br />
SO ORDERED, COUl" CLERK'S OFFICE<br />
2383-22973<br />
N0<strong>04</strong><strong>04</strong>74-1 APR 15 20<strong>11</strong>
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK<br />
COUNTY OF NEW YORK<br />
IN RE: NEW YORK COUNTY<br />
ASBESTOS LITIGATION<br />
~-<br />
THlS DOCUMENT REFERS TO:<br />
MAURl SAVOLAINEN AND SILJA<br />
S AVOLAINEN,<br />
-against-<br />
Plaintiffs,<br />
NYCAL<br />
I.A.S. Part 30<br />
(Heitler, 3.)<br />
Index No.: 106962/01<br />
NO OPPOSITION<br />
SUMMARY JUDGMENT<br />
MOTION AND ORDER<br />
A. C. & S., NC., el ol.,<br />
I<br />
Defendants.<br />
WHEREFORE, defendant, Treadwell Corporation, hereby requests summary judgment in<br />
the above entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules § 3212, dismissing plaintiffs'<br />
complaint against defendant, Treadwell Corporation, with prejudice in this action, and there<br />
being no opposition thereto,<br />
OKDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against<br />
defendant, Treadwell Corporatian, be and the Same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and<br />
without costs.<br />
Dated: New York, New York<br />
T'..<br />
Carol M. Tempesta, Esq?<br />
Attorney for Defendant<br />
Treadwell Corporation<br />
MCGIVNEY & UUGER, P.C.<br />
80 Broad Street-Suite 2300 700 Broadway<br />
New York, New York 100<strong>04</strong><br />
(212) 509-3456<br />
, New York 10003<br />
APR 2 6 20''<br />
SO ORDERED,<br />
Hon. Sherry Klein Heitler<br />
p\EW YORK<br />
4LERK~ OFFICE'<br />
NDO4<strong>04</strong>78-3
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK<br />
COUNTY OF NEW YORK -<br />
IN RE: NEW YORK COUNTY<br />
j NYCAL<br />
ASBESTOS LlTJGATION<br />
i I.A.S. Part 30<br />
i (Heitler, J.)<br />
6<br />
THIS DOCUMENT REFERS TO:<br />
,<br />
i Index No.: 106962/01<br />
MAURI SAVOLAlNEN AND SILJA<br />
SAVOLAlNEN,<br />
NO OPPOSITION<br />
Plaintiffs,<br />
SUMMARY JUDGmNT<br />
i MOTION AND ORDER<br />
-against-<br />
A. C. & S., INC., et al.,<br />
Defendants.<br />
i<br />
WHEREFORE, defendant, Safeguard Industrial Equipment Co., hereby requests<br />
summary judgment in the above entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules 6 32 12,<br />
dismissing plaintiffs’ complaint against defendant, Safeguard Industrial Equipment Co., with<br />
prejudice in this action, and there being no opposition thereto,<br />
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against<br />
defendant, Safeguard Industrial Equipment Co., be and the same are hereby dismissed with<br />
prejudice and without costs.<br />
Dated: New Yor , New York<br />
dl ,20<strong>11</strong><br />
FILED<br />
Matth D. Sampar, Esq.<br />
Attorney. Defendant Attorney for Plaintiffs<br />
Safeguard Industrial Equipment Co.<br />
Mauri Savolainen and Silja Savolainen<br />
MCGIVNEY & KLUCER, P.C.<br />
WEITZ & LUXENBERG, P.C.<br />
80 Broad Street-Suite 2300<br />
700 Broadway<br />
New York, New York 100<strong>04</strong><br />
New York, New York 10003<br />
(212) 509-3456<br />
(212) --. 558-5500<br />
SO ORDERED,<br />
Hon. Sherry Klein Heitler<br />
324-579013<br />
N0<strong>04</strong><strong>04</strong>78- 1
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK<br />
COUNTY OF NEW YORK<br />
IN KI3: NEW YORK COUNTY<br />
! NYCAL<br />
ASBESTOS LlTIGATION<br />
i I.A.S. Part 30<br />
! (Heitler, J.)<br />
1<br />
THIS DOCUMENT REFERS TO:<br />
i Index No.: 1 IW7!YOOfi&><br />
DONNA M. MEDER, PERSONAL 106797/06<br />
REPRESENTATIVE FOR THE ESTATE OF<br />
DONALD E. SIERING,<br />
i NO OPPOSITION<br />
Plaintiffs, j SUMMARY JUDGMENT<br />
i MOTION AND ORDER .<br />
-against-<br />
A. C. & S., XNC., et al.,<br />
Defendants. :<br />
WHEREFORE, defendant, Treadwell Corporation, hereby requests summary judgment in<br />
the above entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules 5 3212, dismissing plaintiffs'<br />
complaint against defendant, Treadwell Corporation, with prejudice in this action, and there<br />
being no opposition thereto,<br />
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against<br />
defendant, Treadwell Corporation, be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and<br />
without costs.<br />
Dated: New York, New York<br />
,Ti<br />
Michele J. Mittlehm, Esq.<br />
Attorney for Defendant<br />
Treadwell Corporation<br />
MCGIVNEY & KLLJFER, P.C.<br />
80 Broad Street-Suite 2300<br />
New York, New York 100<strong>04</strong><br />
(212) 509-3456<br />
SO ORDEmD,<br />
Estate of Donald E. Siering<br />
WElTZ & LUXENBERG, P.C.<br />
700 Broadway<br />
New York, New York 10003<br />
Fl<br />
123GQW<br />
APR 2 6 20<strong>11</strong><br />
NEW YORK<br />
1y CLERK'S oFFm<br />
N0<strong>04</strong><strong>04</strong>78-1
SUPRfZME COURT OF THE S7ATE OF NEW Y ORK<br />
COUNTY OF NEW YORK<br />
IN E: NkW YORK COUNTY<br />
ASBESTOS LTTIGATION<br />
THIS DOCUMENT REFERS To:<br />
EDWARD R. SKELLEY AND BARBARA J.<br />
SKELLEY,<br />
-against-<br />
A. C. & S., INC., et ai.,<br />
Plaintiffs,<br />
Defendants.<br />
NYCAL<br />
I.A.S. Part 30<br />
(Heitler, J.><br />
u<br />
Index No.: <strong>11</strong>9379/00, 107095/01<br />
NO OPPOSITION<br />
SUMMARY JUDGMENT<br />
MOTION AND ORDER<br />
WHEREFORE, defendant, Treadwell Corporation, hereby requests summary judgment in<br />
the above entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules fj 3212, dismissing plaintiffs’<br />
complaint against defendant, Treadwell Corporation, with prejudice in this action, and there<br />
being no opposition thereto,<br />
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against<br />
defendant, Treadwell Corporation, be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and<br />
without co’sts.<br />
Dated: New York. New York<br />
Treadwell Corporation<br />
MCGJVNEY & KLUGER, P.C.<br />
80 Broad Street-Suite 2300<br />
New York, New York 100<strong>04</strong><br />
(212) 509-3456<br />
SO ORDERED,<br />
EdwardR. Skelley and Barbara J.<br />
WEITZ & LUXENBERG, P.c.<br />
700 Broadway<br />
New York, New York 10003<br />
F<br />
APR 2 6 20’’<br />
p;Ey\ YOWL<br />
couN\ITy CLERK’S<br />
1235-2334
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW Y OM<br />
COUNTY OF NEW YORK<br />
EDWARD R. SKELLEY and BARBARA J.<br />
SKELLEY,<br />
A.C. & S., INC., et al.,<br />
Plaintiff(s),<br />
-against-<br />
NYCAL<br />
I.A.S. Part 30<br />
: (Hon. Sheny Klein Heitler)<br />
: Index No(s).: 107095-01<br />
: NO-OPPOSITION SUMMARY<br />
: JUDGMENT MOTION AND<br />
ORDER<br />
I<br />
WHEREFORE, defendant CRANE CO. hereby requests summary judgment in the<br />
above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212, dismissing<br />
plaintiffs' complaint against defendant CRANE CO. with prejudice, and there being no<br />
opposition thereto,<br />
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against<br />
defendant CRANE CO. be, and the same are hereby, dismissed with prejudice and without costs.<br />
Dated: 3 \3 O\ (\<br />
Newxork, New Pork<br />
?<br />
i<br />
Frank Ortiz, Esq.<br />
WEITZ & LUXENBERG, P.C,<br />
Attorneys for Plaintiff(s)<br />
700 Broadway CRANE CO.<br />
New York, NY 10003<br />
599 Lexington Avenue<br />
(212) 558-5500<br />
New York, NY 10022<br />
(212) 536-3900<br />
NEW Y0R3'K<br />
SO ORDERED,<br />
Hon. Sherry Klein Heitler<br />
APR 1520<strong>11</strong>
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YOKK<br />
comm OF NEW YO^<br />
I_---<br />
IN RE: NEW YORK COUNTY<br />
ASBESTOS LITIGATION<br />
/ NYCAL<br />
i I.A.S. Part 3,<br />
j (Heitler, J.)<br />
THIS DOCUMENT REFERS Fro:<br />
; Index No.: 1 1937610<br />
ELlZABETH WALTER, INDIVIDUALY AND<br />
AS EXEC. FOR THE ESTATE OF THEODORE i<br />
F. WALKER, \ NO OPPOSITION<br />
j SUMMARY JUDGMENT<br />
Plaintiffs, i MOTION AND ORDER<br />
-against-<br />
A. C. & S., rNC., et al.,<br />
Defendants.<br />
i<br />
WHEREFOE, defendant, Treadwell Corporation, hereby requests summary judgment in<br />
the above entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules 8 3212, dismissing plaintiffs'<br />
complaint against defendant, Treadwell Corporation, with prejudice in this action, and there<br />
being no opposition thereto,<br />
ORDERED, that upon notice to all.co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against<br />
defendant, Treadwell Corporation, be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and<br />
without costs.<br />
Attorney for Defendant<br />
Treadwell Corporation<br />
MCGIVNEY & KLWGER, P.C.<br />
80 Broad Street-Suite 2300<br />
New York, New York 100<strong>04</strong><br />
(212) 509-3456<br />
WEXTZ & LUXENBERG, P.C.<br />
SO ORDERED,<br />
N0<strong>04</strong><strong>04</strong>78-1
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK<br />
COUN‘1’Y OF NEW YORK<br />
IN RE-NEW YOKK COUNTY<br />
i NYCAL<br />
ASBESTOS LITIGATION<br />
j T.A.S. Part 30<br />
i (Heitler, J.)<br />
THIS DOCUMENT REFERS TO:<br />
i Index No.: <strong>11</strong>9378/00,<br />
JOAN C. SPARLING, AS EXECUTRIX FOR<br />
THE ESTATE OF OSCAR H. SPARLING, AND j<br />
JOAN C. SPARLING, INDIVIDUALLY,<br />
A. C. & S., INC., etal.,<br />
Plaintiffs, i NO OPPOSITION<br />
i SUMMARY JUDGMENT<br />
-against- i MOTION AND ORDER<br />
-<br />
Defendants.<br />
i<br />
WHEREFORE, defendant, Oakfabco, Inc., hereby requests summary judgment in the<br />
above entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules 8 3212, dismissing plaintiffs’<br />
complaint against defendant, Oakfabco, Inc., with prejudice in this action, and there being no<br />
opposition thereto,<br />
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against<br />
defendant, Oakfabco, Inc., be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and without<br />
costs.<br />
Dated: New York. New York<br />
Attorney for Defendant<br />
Oakfabco, Inc.<br />
M c G ~ & Y KLUGER, P.C.<br />
80 Broad Street-Suite 2300<br />
New York, New York 100<strong>04</strong><br />
(212) 509-3456<br />
SO ORDERED,<br />
WEITZ & LUXENBERG, P.C.<br />
700 Broadway<br />
New York, New York 10003 APR 2 6 20<strong>11</strong><br />
NE’&/ YORK<br />
COUNTY CLERKS 8FFIGt<br />
2571-0756s
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK<br />
COUNTY OF NEW YON<br />
IN RE: NEW YORK COUNTY<br />
! NYCAL<br />
ASBESTOS LITIGATION<br />
j I.A.S. Part 30<br />
j (Heitler, J.)<br />
THIS D~ECENT REFERS m:<br />
i Index No.: 107450/01<br />
KATHY METZGER, AS EXECUTRIX FOR THE i<br />
ESTATE OF DENNIS M. WHALEN,<br />
-against-<br />
A. C. & S., INC., et al.,<br />
i<br />
NO OPPOSITION<br />
Plaintiffs, j SUMMARY JUDGMENT<br />
j MOTION AND ORDER<br />
Defendants.<br />
j<br />
WHEREFORE, defendant, Treadwell Corporation, hereby requests summary judgment in<br />
the above entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules § 3212, dismissing plaintiffs'<br />
complaint against defendant, Treadwell Corporation, with prejudice in this action, and there<br />
being no opposition thereto,<br />
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against<br />
defendant, Treadwell Corporation, be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and<br />
without costs.<br />
Dated: New York, New York<br />
Treadwell corporation<br />
MCGIVNEY & KLUGER, P.C.<br />
80 Broad Street-Suite 2300<br />
New York, New York 100<strong>04</strong><br />
(212) 509-3456<br />
SO ORDERED,<br />
WEITZ & LUXENBERG, P.C.<br />
New 700 Broadway York, New York 10003 FILED<br />
APR 2 6 20<strong>11</strong><br />
1235-1937 NE\/\J YORK<br />
COUNTY CLERKS OFFICE<br />
N0<strong>04</strong><strong>04</strong>78-1
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK<br />
COUNTY OF NEW YORK<br />
IN RE: NEW YOFX CITY ASBESTOS LITIGATION<br />
__________________________________l__ll_----------"--------------<br />
X<br />
This Document Relates To:<br />
: NYCAL<br />
EDWARD WYANT, SR. and NANCY WYANT, : 1,A.S. Part 30<br />
: (Hon. Sherry Klein Heitler)<br />
Plaintiff( s),<br />
: Index No(s).: 107774-01<br />
-against-<br />
: NO-OPPOSITION SUMMARY<br />
A.C. & S., INC., et al.,<br />
: JUDGMENT MOTION AND<br />
: ORDER<br />
Defendants.<br />
frr_rr_______________---------------------------------------------<br />
WHEREFORE, defendant CRANE CO. hereby requests summary judgment in the<br />
above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 32 12, dismissing<br />
plaintiffs' complaint against defendant CRANE CO. with prejudice, and there being no<br />
apposition thereto,<br />
ORLlERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against<br />
defendant CRANE CO. be, and the same are hereby, dismissed with prejudice and without costs.<br />
Dated: 3 \>u\ \\<br />
X<br />
Attorneys for Plaintiff(s)<br />
700 Broadway CRANECO. 1 E D '<br />
New York, NY 10003<br />
(212) 558-5500<br />
599 Lexington Avenue<br />
New York, NY 10022 APR 2 6 20<strong>11</strong><br />
SO ORDERED,<br />
pi!: I*+ VURK<br />
rnii~ if CLERK'S OFFICE<br />
15 20<strong>11</strong>
NYCAL<br />
I.A.S. Part 30<br />
Hon. Sherry Klein Heitler, JSC.<br />
DIANA A. JOHNSON, AS ADMINISTRATRIX FOR THE ESTATE<br />
OF SIMON 6. MANNING, AND DIANA A. JOHNSON,<br />
INDIVIDUALLY,<br />
Plaintiffs,<br />
Index No,: 108009-2001<br />
NO OPPOSITION SUMMARY JUDGMENT<br />
MOTION AND ORDER<br />
A.C. & S INC. et al. including,<br />
GENERAL ELECTRIC COMPANY,<br />
-against-<br />
Defendants.<br />
WHEREFORE, defendant GENERAL ELECTRIC COMPANY hereby request summary judgment in<br />
the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212, dismissing plaintiffs’<br />
complaint against defendant GENERAL ELECTRIC COMPANY with prejudice, and there being no<br />
opposition thereto,<br />
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against defendant<br />
GENERAL ELECTRIC COMPANY be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and without costs.<br />
D<br />
Attorney for Pluintvfs<br />
546 Fifth Avenue, qfh Floor<br />
New York, New York 1003<br />
m -<br />
*-<br />
1 .<br />
I en<br />
Stephen Novakidis, Esq.<br />
Sedgwick, Detert, Moran & ArF,!<br />
Attorneys for General Electric Company<br />
Three Gateway Center, 12th Floor<br />
Newark, NJ 07102<br />
ApR 2 6 20”<br />
SO ORDERED,<br />
APR 15 20<strong>11</strong><br />
NJl432746v 1
SUPREME COIJRT OF THE STATE OF NEW YOKK<br />
COUNTY OF NEW YORK<br />
IN RE: NEW YO& COUNTY i NYCAL<br />
ASBESTOS LITIGATION<br />
i 1A.S. Part 30<br />
II_ ! (Heitler, J.)<br />
THIS DOCUMENT REFERS TO:<br />
HARRY T. POWERS, INDIVIDUALLY AND<br />
PERSONAL REPRESENTATIVE FOR THE<br />
ESTATE OF GLENNA E. POWERS,<br />
-against-<br />
Plaintiffs,<br />
j Index No.: 109019/01<br />
!<br />
j NO OPPOSITION<br />
SUMMARY JUDGMENT<br />
! MOTION AND ORDER<br />
A. C. & S., INC., et al.,<br />
Defendants.<br />
i<br />
WHEFEFORE, defendant, Treadwell Corporation, hereby requests summary judgment in<br />
the above entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules $ 3212, dismissing plaintiffs’<br />
complaint against defendant, Treadwell Corporation, with prejudice in this action, and there<br />
being no opposition thereto,<br />
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against<br />
defendant, Treadwell Corporation, be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and<br />
without costs.<br />
Carol M. Tempesta, Esq.<br />
Attorney for Defendant<br />
Treadwell Corporation<br />
MCGIVNEY & UUGER, P.C.<br />
80 Broad Street-Suite 2300<br />
New York, New York 100<strong>04</strong><br />
(212) 509-3456<br />
Estate of Glenna E. Powers<br />
WEIT2 & LUXENBERG, P,<br />
SO ORDERED,<br />
N0<strong>04</strong><strong>04</strong>78- I
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK<br />
COUNTY OF NEW YORK<br />
IN RE NEW YORK CITY ASBESTOS LITIGATION NYCAL<br />
Hon. Sherry Klein Heitler<br />
X<br />
GERALDINE 1. REY, as Administratrix for the Estate of JOHN<br />
REY, and GERALDINE 1. REY, Individually,<br />
-against-<br />
Plaintiff(s),<br />
Index No. 109<strong>11</strong>5-2001<br />
NO OPPOSITION<br />
SUMMARY JUDGMENT MOTION AND<br />
ORDER<br />
A. C. 81 S. INC., et al., including<br />
FOSTER WHEELER CORPORATION,<br />
Defendants.<br />
X<br />
WHEREFORE, defendant FOSTER WHEELER, L.L.C. (sued herein as “FOSTER WHEELER<br />
CORPORATION”) hereby requests summary judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil<br />
Practice Law and Rules Section 3212, dismissing plaintiffs’ complaint against defendant FOSTER<br />
WHEELER, L.L.C. with prejudice, and there being no opposition thereto,<br />
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against defendant<br />
FOSTER WHEELER, L,L,C. be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and without costs.<br />
Dated:<br />
New York New York<br />
3/\4 I<br />
Frank Ortiz, Esq.<br />
Weitz & Luxenberg, P.C.<br />
Attorneys for Plaintvfs<br />
700 Broadway<br />
New York, NY 10003<br />
Dennis E. Vega, Esq.<br />
Sedgwick, Deter?, Moran & Arnold, LLP<br />
Attorneys for Foster Wheeler, L. L.C.<br />
Three Gateway Center, 12‘h Flo<br />
Newark, NJ 07102
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK<br />
cowry OF m w YORK<br />
I_<br />
IN RE: NEW YORK COUNTY<br />
AS BE SI-0 S LI TI GAT1 ON<br />
THIS DOCUMENT REFERS m:<br />
KATHERINE ROMANO, EXECUTRIX FOR<br />
THE ESTATE OF ANTHONY J. ROMANO,<br />
-against-<br />
A. C. & S., INC., et al.,<br />
! NYCAL<br />
i l.A.S. Part 30<br />
i (Heitler, J.)<br />
j<br />
Index No.: <strong>11</strong>0165/Ol<br />
: NO OPPOSITION<br />
Plaintiffs, j SUMMARY JUDGMENT<br />
: MOTION AND ORDER<br />
-<br />
Defendants. !<br />
WHEREFORX, defendant, Treadwell Corporation, hereby requests summary judgment in<br />
the above entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules 8 3212, dismissing plaintiffs’<br />
complaint against defendant, Treadwell Corporation, with prejudice in this action, and there<br />
being no opposition thereto,<br />
ORDEWD, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against<br />
defendant, Treadwell Corporation, be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and<br />
without costs.<br />
Dated: New York, New York<br />
“/[ ,20<strong>11</strong><br />
Carol M. Tempesta, Esq. ‘<br />
Attorney for Defendant<br />
Treadwell Corporation<br />
MCGIVNEY & KLUGER, P.C.<br />
SO Broad Street-Suite 2300<br />
New York, New York 100<strong>04</strong><br />
(2 12) 509-3456<br />
SO ORDERED,<br />
WHTZ & LUXENBERG, P.C.<br />
700 Broadway<br />
New York, New York 100 SILED<br />
APR 2 6 20’’<br />
N0<strong>04</strong>O474- I
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK<br />
COUNTY OF NEW YORK<br />
IN RE: NEW YORK COUNTY<br />
NYCAL<br />
ASBESTOS LITIGATION<br />
I.A.S. Part 30<br />
(Heitler, J.)<br />
THIS DOCUMENT REFERS TO:<br />
MADELINE MCGINN, INDIVIDUALLY AND<br />
RICHARD JOHN MAYERICK AND RICHARD<br />
JOHN MAYERICK AS PERSONAL<br />
REPRESENTATIVES FOR THE ESTATE OF<br />
HAROLD MCGINN,<br />
Plain tiffs ,<br />
-against-<br />
A. C. & S., INC., et al.,<br />
Defendants.<br />
Index No.: <strong>11</strong><strong>04</strong>38/01<br />
NO OPPOSITION<br />
SUMMARY JUDGMENT<br />
MOTION AND ORDER<br />
WHEREFORE, defendant, Treadwell Corporation, hereby requests summary judgment in<br />
the above entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules 0 3212, dismissing plaintiffs’<br />
complaint against defendant, Treadwell Corporation, with prejudice in this action, and there<br />
being no opposition thereto,<br />
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against<br />
defendant, Treadwell Corporation, be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and<br />
without costs.<br />
Dated: New York, New York<br />
4 / ! ,20<strong>11</strong><br />
~<br />
Carol M. Tempesta, Esq.<br />
Attorney for Defendant<br />
Treadwell Corporation<br />
MCGIVNEY & KLUGE& P.C.<br />
80 Broad Street-Suite 2300<br />
New York. New York 100<strong>04</strong><br />
(212) 509-3456<br />
SO ORDERED,<br />
-<br />
Wm-OMZ-<br />
Attorney far Plaintiffs<br />
EstateofHaroldMcGinn F I L<br />
WElTZ & LUXENBERG, P.C.<br />
700 Broadway<br />
”’<br />
New York, New York 10003 AP<br />
fJ E‘$/ YO n K<br />
COUNTY CLERK‘S OFFICE<br />
1235-19343<br />
N0<strong>04</strong><strong>04</strong>78-1<br />
APR 15 20<strong>11</strong>
' NYCAL<br />
BRYAN M. PRICE and LINDA GERACI PRICE, :<br />
Part 30<br />
(Hon. Sherry Klein Heitler)<br />
Plaintiff( s),<br />
-against-<br />
:<br />
Index No. 1 1 1220-0 1<br />
A.C. & S., INC., et al.,<br />
NO-OPPOSTTTON SUMMARY<br />
: JUDGMENT MOTION AND ORDER<br />
Defendants. !<br />
WHEREFORE, defendant CRANE CO. hereby requests suinniary judgment in the<br />
above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212, dismissing<br />
plaintiffs' complaint against defendant CRANE CO. with prejudice, and there being no<br />
opposition thereto,<br />
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against<br />
defendant CRANE CO. be, and the same are hereby, dismissed with prejudice and WithoLit costs<br />
Datcd: 3 \3 L\ I\<br />
Kirste Alford Kneis, Esq.<br />
K&I, ATESLLP<br />
Attorneys for Plaintiff(s)<br />
700 Broadway CRANE CO.<br />
New York, NY 10003 599 Lexington Avenue hpR<br />
(212) 558-5500 New York, NY 10022-6030<br />
4 2 -1-2) 536- 3900<br />
SO ORDERED,
I<br />
536.07695/AJM<br />
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK<br />
COUNTY OF NEW YORK<br />
IN RE: NEW YORK CITY<br />
ASBESTOS LITIGATION :<br />
This document relates to:<br />
NATALE V. GRILLO,<br />
NYCAL<br />
IAS PART 30<br />
(Honorab e Sherry K-oin Heitler<br />
Index No. :<br />
12<strong>11</strong>18/01<br />
(January 20<strong>11</strong> Monthly FIFO Trial<br />
Group)<br />
1<br />
Defendants.<br />
NO OPPOSITION<br />
SUMMARY JUDGMENT MOTION<br />
AND ORDER<br />
I<br />
WHEREFORE,<br />
defendant, Unit<br />
d Conveyor Corporation, hereby<br />
requests summary judgment in the<br />
above-entitled case, pursuant to<br />
Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212, dismissing plaintiff's<br />
Complaint against defendant, United Conveyor Corporation, with<br />
prejudice, and there being no opposition thereto.<br />
ORDERED,<br />
that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and<br />
crossclaims against defendant, United Conveyor Corporation, be and the<br />
same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and without<br />
D<br />
I .<br />
\<br />
I<br />
!<br />
DATED :<br />
East Hanover New Jersey<br />
APT? 2 6 20<strong>11</strong><br />
:'<br />
WEITZ & LUXENBERG<br />
Attorneys for Plaintiff<br />
& FLINN<br />
700 Broadway Attorneys for Defendant,<br />
New York, New York 10003<br />
United Conveyor Corporation<br />
72 Eagle Rock Avenue, Suite 350<br />
P.O. Box 438<br />
East Hanover, New Jersey 07936<br />
SO ORDERED,
536.07703/AJM<br />
;UPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK<br />
ZOUNTY OF NEW YORK<br />
CN RE: NEW YORK CITY<br />
NYCAL<br />
ASBESTOS LITIGATION : IAS PART 30<br />
rhis document relates to:<br />
(Honorable Sherry K1 in H it1<br />
3ERTWD E. LINDSEY,<br />
: Index No.: *fi-><br />
120575/01<br />
Plaintiff,<br />
: (January 20<strong>11</strong> Monthly FIFO Trial<br />
vs . : Group)<br />
JNITED CONVEYOR CORPORATION,<br />
2t al., : NO OPPOSITION<br />
Defendants.<br />
:<br />
:<br />
SUMMARY JUDGMENT MOTION<br />
AND ORDER<br />
WHEREFORE, defendant, United Conveyor Corporation, hereby<br />
requests summary judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to<br />
Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212, dismissing plaintiff's<br />
Complaint against defendant, United Conveyor Corporation, with<br />
prejudice, and there being no opposition thereto.<br />
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and<br />
crossclaims against defendant, United Conveyor Corporation, e and the<br />
d .', ?- p e,<br />
same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and wiLhout ed'as.<br />
I , ><br />
I ) Ij 20<strong>11</strong><br />
700 Broadway Attorneys for Defendant,<br />
New York, New York 10003<br />
United Conveyor Corporation<br />
72 Eagle Rock Avenue, Suite 350<br />
P.O. Box 438<br />
East Hanover, New Jersey 07936<br />
SO ORDERED,<br />
"-- "<br />
Honorable Shevy Klein Heitler
536.07703/AJM<br />
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK<br />
COUNTY OF NEW YORK<br />
IN RE: NEW YORK CITY<br />
NYCAL<br />
ASBESTOS LITIGATION : IAS PART 30<br />
(Honorable ,,,erry Klein Heitler)<br />
This document relates to:<br />
RUDOLPH BIBOW,<br />
Index No. :<br />
VS .<br />
Plaintiff,<br />
(January 20<strong>11</strong> Monthly FIFO Trial<br />
Group)<br />
UNITED CONVEYOR CORPORATION,<br />
et al.,<br />
Defendants.<br />
NO OPPOSITION<br />
SUMMARY JUDGMENT MOTION<br />
AND ORDER<br />
WHEREFORE,<br />
defendant, United Conveyor Corporation, hereby<br />
requests summary judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to<br />
Civil. Practice Law and Rules Section 3212,<br />
dismissing plaintiff's<br />
Complaint against defendant, United Conveyor Corporation, with<br />
prejudice, and there being no opposition thereto.<br />
ORDERED,<br />
that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and<br />
crossclaims aqainst defendant, United Conveyor Corporation, be and the<br />
-..<br />
same are hereby dismissed w itEAj<br />
Bzld without costs.<br />
APR 2 6 20<strong>11</strong><br />
& FLINN<br />
700 Broadway Attorneys for Defendant,<br />
New York, New York 10003<br />
United Conveyor Corporation<br />
72 Eagle Rock Avenue, Suite 350<br />
, Box 438<br />
t Hanover, New Jersey 07936<br />
SO ORDERED,
536.07706/AJM<br />
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW -*,-.---<br />
COUNTY OF NEW YORK<br />
YUKK<br />
IN RE: NEW YORK CITY<br />
ASBESTOS LITIGATION :<br />
This document relates to:<br />
PETER CONNOLLY,<br />
NYCAL<br />
IAS PART 30<br />
(Honorab e Sherry Klein Heitler)<br />
Index No. : <strong>11</strong>233/01<br />
vs .<br />
Plaintiff,<br />
(January 20<strong>11</strong> Monthly FIFO T rial<br />
Group)<br />
LIZTEC CONVEYOR COKPORPITION,<br />
et al.,<br />
Defendants.<br />
NO BPPOSITLON<br />
SUMMARY JUDGMENT MOTION<br />
AND ORDER<br />
WHEREFORE, defendant, United Conveyor Corporation, hereby<br />
requests summary judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to<br />
Complaint against defendant, United Conveyor Corporation, with<br />
prejudice, and there being no opposition thereto.<br />
ORDERED, that upon notice to a<strong>11</strong> co-defendants, a<strong>11</strong> claims and<br />
crossclaims against defendant, United Conveyor Corporation, be and<br />
same are hereby dismi.;sed with prejudice and without<br />
DATED: ‘f./&/,<br />
East Hanover, New Jersey<br />
Attorneys for<br />
700 Broadway<br />
New York, New<br />
SO ORDERED,<br />
Plaintiff<br />
York 10003<br />
@y<br />
& FLINN<br />
Attorneys for Defendant,<br />
United Conveyor Corporat ion<br />
72 Eagle Rock<br />
Avenue, Su .ite 350<br />
P.O. Box 438<br />
East Hanover, New Jersey - 07936<br />
-.1.* -~~~<br />
Honorabl Sh ry Klein Heitler
WHEREFORE, defendant Goulds Pumps Inc. hereby requests summary judgment in the aboveentitled<br />
case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212, dismissing plaintiff's complaint<br />
against defendant Goulds Pumps Inc.. with prejudice, and there being no opposition thereto,<br />
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against defendant<br />
Goulds Pumps Inc., be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and without costs.<br />
Dated: New York, New York<br />
JI h ,20<strong>11</strong><br />
e-<br />
Attorney for Plaintiff<br />
LEVY, PHILLIPS & KQNIGSBERG, LLP<br />
800 Third Avenue, 1 1 th Floor<br />
New York, New York 10022<br />
CULLEN & DYKMAN LLP<br />
177 Montague Street<br />
SO ORDERED,<br />
Hon. Sherry K. Heitler<br />
APR 2 6 20''<br />
NEV.l '(ORK<br />
c.,u~Ty GLknK'S OFFICE'<br />
00224274.WPD
536.08<strong>11</strong>9/AJM<br />
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK<br />
COUNTY OF NEW YORK<br />
IN RE: NEW YORK CITY<br />
NYCAL<br />
ASBESTOS LITIGATION : IAS PART 30<br />
(Honorable ,,,erry Klein Heitler)<br />
This document relates to:<br />
: Index No.: <strong>11</strong>3<strong>26</strong>0/01<br />
JOSEPH McCARTHY, Deceased,<br />
Plaintiff,<br />
:<br />
:<br />
(January 20<strong>11</strong> Monthly FIFO Trial<br />
Group)<br />
vs *<br />
: NO OPPOSITION<br />
UNITED CONVEYOR CORPORATION, : SUMMARY JUDGMENT MOTION<br />
et al. , : AND ORDER<br />
Defendants.<br />
WHEREFORE,<br />
defendant, United Conveyor Corporation, hereby<br />
requests summary judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to<br />
Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212, dismissing plaintiff's<br />
Complaint against defendant, United Conveyor Corporation, with<br />
prejudice, and there being no opposition thereto.<br />
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and<br />
crossclaims against defendant, United Conveyor Coyporation, be and the<br />
same are hereby dismissed with FeiuLcEaQwithout costs.<br />
DATED: 3'&//<br />
ARRITY, GF!AHAM, MURPHY, GAROFALO<br />
Attorneys for Plaintiff<br />
& FLINN<br />
700 Broadway Attorneys for Defendant,<br />
New York, New York 10003<br />
United Conveyor Corporation<br />
72 Eagle Rock Avenue, Suite 350<br />
so ORDERED ,<br />
New Jer 'sey 07936
SUPREME COURT QF THE STATE OF NEW YORK<br />
COUNTY OF NEW YORK<br />
Robert D, Hart<br />
NO OPPOSITION SUMMARY<br />
JUDGMENT MOTION<br />
AND ORDER<br />
WHEREFORE, defendant Goulds Pumps Inc. hereby requests summary judgment in the above-<br />
entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212, dismissing plaintiffs complaint<br />
against defendant Goulds Pumps Inc.. with prejudice, and there being no opposition thereto,<br />
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against defendant<br />
Gaulds Pumps Inc., be and the sme are hereby dismissed with prejudice and without costs.<br />
~~<br />
D ~ - :;kl d ~<br />
Erica V. Cesaro, Esq. Justin Tafe, sq.<br />
I<br />
Attorney far Plaintiff Att ey for Defendant<br />
LEVY, PHILLIPS & KONIGSBERG, LLP CULLEN & DYKMAN LL<br />
800 Third Avenue, <strong>11</strong> "' Floor<br />
177 Montague Street<br />
New York, New York 10022<br />
Arooklyn, New Yark <strong>11</strong>201<br />
I k, E D<br />
itler<br />
COUNTY CLERK'S .. - OFFIC@<br />
00224273. WPD
WHEREFORE, defendant Goulds Pumps Inc. hereby requests summary judgment in the aboveentitled<br />
case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212, dismissing plaintiffs complaint<br />
against defendant Goulds Pumps Inc.. with prejudice, and there being no opposition thereto,<br />
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against defendant<br />
Goulds Pumps Inc., be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and without costs.<br />
Dated: New York, New York<br />
$I,! ,20<strong>11</strong><br />
Attorney for Plaintiff<br />
LEVY, PHILLIPS & KONIGSBERG, LLP<br />
800 Third Avenue, 1 lth Floor<br />
New York, New York 10022<br />
177 Montague Street<br />
SO ORDERED,<br />
00224273.WPD
*<br />
.L<br />
TMc:CC(jpk)<br />
3 0/15/09<br />
THIS DOCUMENT RELATES TO:<br />
EDWAR.D MARTINI<br />
NO OPPOSITION SUMMARY<br />
JUDGMENT MOTION AND<br />
ORDER<br />
WHEREFORE, defendant Consolidated Edison Company of New York, hc.<br />
hereby requests summary judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law<br />
and Rules Section 3212, dismissing plaintiffs complaint against defendant Consolidated Edison<br />
Company of New York, Inc. with prejudice, and there being no opposition thereto,<br />
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross-claims<br />
,<br />
against defendant Consolidated Edison Company of New York, Inc., be and the same are hereby<br />
dismissed with prejudice and without costs.<br />
Dated: New,Ywk, New York<br />
_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ - _ _ ~ _ _ I I _ _ . _<br />
Benjhn Darche, Esq.<br />
WEITZ & LUXENBERG, P.C.<br />
Attorneys for Plaintiff<br />
700 Broadway<br />
New York, NY 100035<br />
Consolidated Edison Company of New<br />
York, Inc.<br />
4 Irving Place<br />
New York, NY<br />
Our File No<br />
S-6783-01<br />
SO ORDERED:<br />
Hon. Sherry Klein Heitler<br />
APR 2 6 20<strong>11</strong>
WHEREFORE, defendant Gaulds Pumps Inc. hereby requests summary judgment in the abaveentitled<br />
case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212, dismissing plaintiffs complaint<br />
against defendant Goulds Pumps Inc.. with prejudice, and there being no opposition thereto,<br />
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against defendant<br />
Goulds Pumps Inc,, be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice: and without costs.<br />
Ericav. Cesaro, Esq.<br />
Attorney for Plaintiff<br />
LEVY, PHILLIPS & KONIGSBERC, LLP CULLEN & DYKMAN LLP<br />
800 Third Avenue, 1 lth Floor<br />
177 Montague Street<br />
New York, New York 10022 n, New York <strong>11</strong>201<br />
SO ORDERED,<br />
FILED<br />
APR 2 6 20<strong>11</strong><br />
I<br />
00224271 ,WPU
Carl Inzanti<br />
NO OPPOSITION SUMMARY<br />
JUDGMENT MOTION<br />
AND ORDER<br />
WHEREFORE, defendant Goulds Pumps Inc. hereby requests summary judgment in the aboveentitled<br />
case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212, dismissing plaintiffs complaint<br />
against defendant Goulds Pumps Inc.. with prejudice, and there being no opposition thereto,<br />
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against defendant<br />
Goulds Pumps Inc., be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and without costs.<br />
Dated: New York, New York<br />
LEVY, PHILLIPS & KQNIGSBERG, LLP<br />
800 Third Avenue, 1 lth Floor<br />
New York, New York 10022<br />
CULLEN & DYKMAN LLP<br />
177 Montague Street<br />
Brooklyn, New York<br />
?Y 8)<br />
SO ORDERED, APR 2 6 20<strong>11</strong><br />
NEW YORK<br />
COUNTY CLERK'S OFF/%<br />
0022427 1 .WPD<br />
APR 13 20<strong>11</strong>
536.07706/AJM<br />
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW<br />
COUNTY OF NEW YORK<br />
IN RE: NEW YORK CITY<br />
ASBESTOS LITIGATION :<br />
This document relates to:<br />
PETER CONNOLLY,<br />
YORK<br />
NYCAL<br />
IAS PART 30<br />
(Honorable ,,,erry Klein Heitler)<br />
Index No. :<br />
(January 20<strong>11</strong> Monthly FIFO Trial<br />
Group)<br />
Defendants.<br />
NO OPPOYITION<br />
SUMMARY JUDGMENT MOTION<br />
AND ORDER<br />
WHEREFORE, defendant, United Conveyor Corporation, hereby<br />
'equests summary judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to<br />
'ivil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212, dismissing plaintiff's<br />
omplaint against defendant, United Conveyor<br />
Corporation, with<br />
rejudice, and there being no opposition thereto.<br />
ORDEFtED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and<br />
rossclaims against defendant, United Conveyor Corporation, be and<br />
am are hereby dismissed with prejudice and without<br />
4TED: +)i',/I,<br />
East Hanover, New Jersey<br />
Wtorneys for Plaintiff<br />
& FLINN<br />
700 Broadway Attorneys for Defendant,<br />
ilew York, New York 10003<br />
United Conveyor Corporation<br />
72 Eagle Rock Avenue, Suite 350<br />
P.O. Box 438<br />
East Hanover, New Jersey 07936<br />
;O ORDEMD,
536.07706/AJM<br />
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK<br />
COUNTY OF NEW YORK<br />
IN RE: NEW YORK CITY<br />
ASBESTOS LITIGATION :<br />
This document relates to:<br />
JOSEPH W. SHRECK,<br />
VS.<br />
Plaintiff,<br />
UNITED CONVEYOR CORPORATION,<br />
et al. ,<br />
Defendants.<br />
NYCAL<br />
IAS PART 30<br />
(Honorable Sherry K lein Heitler)<br />
Index No. : <strong>11</strong>8721/01<br />
(January 20<strong>11</strong> Monthly FIFO Trial<br />
Group)<br />
NO OPPOSITION<br />
SUMMARY J UDWNT MOTION<br />
AND ORDER<br />
WHEmFORE,<br />
defendant, United Conveyor Corporation, hereby<br />
requests summary judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to<br />
21vil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212, dismissing plaintiff's<br />
Zomplaint against defendant, United Conveyor Corporation, with<br />
prejudice, and there being no opposition thereto.<br />
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, a<strong>11</strong> claims and<br />
zrossclaims against defendant, United Conveyor Corpor<br />
same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and without<br />
, GAROFALO<br />
4ttorneys for Plaintiff<br />
700 Broadway Attorneys for Defendant,<br />
Jew York, New York 10003<br />
United Conveyor Corporation<br />
72 Eagle Rock Avenue, Suite 350<br />
30 ORDERED,<br />
07936
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK<br />
COUNTY OF NEW YORK<br />
BRYAN M. PRICE and LINDA CTERACI PRICE,<br />
-against-<br />
Plain tiff( s),<br />
' NYCAL<br />
I.A.S. Part 3o<br />
: (Hon. Sherry Klein Heitler)<br />
: Index No. <strong>11</strong>9477-01<br />
AC. & S., INC., et al.,<br />
Defendants.<br />
: NO-OPPOSITION SUMMARY<br />
JUDGMENT MOTION AND ORDER<br />
WHEREFORE, defendant CRANE CO. hereby requests summary judgment in the<br />
above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 32 12, dismissing<br />
plaintiffs' complaint against defendant CRANE CO. with prejudice, and there being no<br />
opposition thereto,<br />
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against<br />
defendant CRANE CO. be, and the same are hereby, dismissed with prejudice<br />
Dated: 3 \3 \\ \\<br />
New York, New York<br />
Attorneys lor Plaintiff(s)<br />
Attorneys for Defendant<br />
700 Broadway CRANE CO.<br />
New York, NY 10003<br />
599 Lexington Avenue<br />
(212) 558-5500<br />
New York, NY 10022-6030<br />
,_.._.(212) 536-3900<br />
SO ORDERED,
536.10562/AJM<br />
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF<br />
COUNTY OF NEW YORK<br />
[E W 3RK<br />
IN RE: NEW YORK CITY<br />
ASBESTOS LITIGATION :<br />
This document relates to:<br />
CARMELO A. FICALOR?l,<br />
NY CAL<br />
IAS PART 30<br />
(Honorable Sherry Klein Heitler)<br />
Index No. :<br />
vs *<br />
Plaintiff,<br />
(January 20<strong>11</strong> Monthly FIFO Trial<br />
Group)<br />
UNITED CONVEYOR CORPORATION,<br />
et al. ,<br />
Defendants.<br />
NO OPPOSITION<br />
SUMMARY JUDGMENT MOTION<br />
AND ORDER<br />
WHEFtEFORE,<br />
defendant, United Conveyor Corporation, hereby<br />
requests summary judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to<br />
Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212, dismissing plaintiff's<br />
Complaint against defendant, United Conveyor Corporation, with<br />
prejudice, and there being no opposition thereto.<br />
ORDERED,<br />
that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and<br />
crossclaims against defendant, United Conveyor Corporation, be and the<br />
same are hereby dismissed with pr<br />
Bhout costs.<br />
DATED : m&-,,a( 7fI 70 I /<br />
Attorneys for Plaintiff<br />
700 Broadway Attorneys for Defendant,<br />
New York, New York 10003<br />
United Conveyor Corporation<br />
72 Eagle Rock Avenue, Suite 350<br />
P.O. Box 438<br />
East Hanover, New Jersey 07936<br />
SO ORDERED,<br />
0<strong>11</strong>
536.10562/AJM<br />
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK<br />
COUNTY OF NEW YORK<br />
IN RE: NEW YORK CITY<br />
NYCAL<br />
ASBESTOS LITIGATION : IAS PART 30<br />
(Honorable Sherry Klein Heitler)<br />
This document relates to:<br />
: Index NO.:<br />
ANGEL0 T. D'AGOSTINO,<br />
VS .<br />
Plaintiff, : (January 20<strong>11</strong> Monthly FIFO Trial<br />
: Group)<br />
UNITED CON'JEVCIR ZCREOP?TIO?T, : NO C3PPCBITICN<br />
et al. , : SUMMARY JUDGMENT MOTION<br />
: AND ORDER<br />
Defendants.<br />
WHEREFORE,<br />
defendant, United Conveyor Corporation, hereby<br />
requests summary judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to<br />
Jivil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212, dismissing plaintiff's<br />
:omplaint against defendant, United Conveyor Corporation, with<br />
irejudice, and there being no opposition thereto.<br />
ORDEWD, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and<br />
:rossclaims against defendant, United Conveyor Corporation, be<br />
jame are hereby dismissed with prejudice and withoutbo<br />
bpi: 2 6 20''<br />
-- %Q#l //dm<br />
JEITZ & LUXENBERG<br />
lttorneys for Plaintiff<br />
'00 Broadway<br />
lew York, New York 10003<br />
GARRITY, GRAHAM, MURPHY, GAROFALO<br />
& FLINN<br />
Attorneys for Defendant,<br />
United Conveyor Corporation<br />
72 Eagle Rock Avenue, Suite 350<br />
+-PR~Q. Box 438<br />
East Hanover, New Jersey 07936<br />
0 ORDERED,<br />
Honorable Sherry Klein Heitler
!<br />
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK<br />
COUNTY OF NEW YORK<br />
IN RE:<br />
NEW YORK CITY<br />
ASBESTOS LITIGATION<br />
I.A.S. Part 30<br />
(Heitler, J.)<br />
This Document Relates to:<br />
VlTO CANNIZZARO, AS ADMINISTRATOR FOR<br />
THE ESTATE OF VINCENT CANNIZZARO<br />
INDEX NO.: 01-120390<br />
NO OPPOSITION<br />
SUMMARY JUDGMENT<br />
MOTION AND ORDER<br />
against<br />
A.C. & S., INC., ET AL<br />
I<br />
WHEREFORE, defendant, KOHLER CO., hereby requests summary judgment in the<br />
3bove-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212, dismissing plaintiffs'<br />
:omplaint against defendant, KOHLER CO., with prejudice, and there being no opposition thereto,<br />
ORDERED, that upon notice to all codefendants, all claims and cross claims against<br />
jefendant, KOHLER CO,, be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and without costs.<br />
DATED:<br />
NEW YORK, New York<br />
iOAGLAND, LONGO, MORAN<br />
IUNST & DOUKAS, LLP<br />
ittorneys for Defendant,<br />
(OHLER CO.<br />
LO Paterson Street - PO Box 480<br />
Jew Brunswick, New Jersey 08903<br />
- -,<br />
.* Mviu<br />
EEE?J&N;r<br />
Attorneys for Plaintiff (s),<br />
VlTO CANNIZZARO, as Administrator for the<br />
Estate of VINCENT CANNIZZARO<br />
700 Broadway New York, New York 10003<br />
l<br />
HOAQLAND, LONGO<br />
MORAN, DUNST 8<br />
DOUKAS, U P<br />
AUORNEYS AT LAW<br />
NORTH JERSEY<br />
40 PAfERSON ST<br />
PO BOX 480<br />
NEWMUWICK, NJ<br />
SOUTH JERSEY<br />
701 WTSEY'S MILL RD<br />
SmE 202<br />
HRMMONTON. NJ<br />
io ORDERED:<br />
i
536.10564/AJM<br />
SUPREME COURT OF TI E STATE OF TEW<br />
COUNTY OF NEW YORK<br />
IN RE: NEW YORK CITY<br />
ASBESTOS LITIGATION :<br />
This document relates to:<br />
RAYMOND J. HICKEY,<br />
3RK<br />
NYCAL<br />
IAS PART 30<br />
(Honorable Sherry Klein Heitler)<br />
Index No. :<br />
vs .<br />
Plaintiff,<br />
(January 20<strong>11</strong> Monthly FIFO Trial<br />
Group)<br />
UNITED CONVEYOR CORPORATION,<br />
et al. ,<br />
Defendants.<br />
NO OPPOSITION<br />
SUMMARY JUDCMENT MOTION<br />
AND ORDER<br />
WHEREFORE,<br />
defendant, United Conveyor Corporation, hereby<br />
requests summary judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to<br />
Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212, dismissing plaintiff's<br />
Complaint against defendant, United Conveyor Corporation, with<br />
prejudice, and there being no opposition thereto.<br />
ORDERED, that upon notice to a<strong>11</strong> co-defendants, all claims and<br />
crossclaims against defendant, United Conveyor Corporation, be and the<br />
same are hereby dismissed with e&&&i&ithout<br />
DATED : fl&d w - 4 'z o//<br />
costs.<br />
, GAROFALO<br />
700 Broadway Attorneys for Defendant,<br />
New York, New York 10003<br />
United Conveyor Corporation<br />
72 Eagle Rock Avenue, Suite 350<br />
SO ORDERED,<br />
A<br />
P.O. Box 438<br />
st Hanover, New Jersey 07936
536.09778/AJM<br />
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK<br />
COUNTY OF NEW YORK<br />
IN RE: NEW YORK CITY<br />
ASBESTOS LITIGATION :<br />
This document relates to:<br />
JAMES R. FLEMING, Deceased,<br />
NYCAL<br />
IAS PART 30<br />
(Honorable Sherry Klein Heitler)<br />
Index No. :<br />
vs .<br />
Plaintiff,<br />
(January 20<strong>11</strong> Monthly FIFO Trial<br />
Group)<br />
UNITED CONVEYOR CORPORATION, : NO OPPOSITION<br />
et al., : SUMMARY JUDGMENT MOTION<br />
: AND ORDER<br />
Defendants.<br />
WHEREFORE,<br />
defendant, United Conveyor Corporation, hereby<br />
requests summary judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to<br />
Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212,<br />
dismissing plaintiff's<br />
Complaint against defendant, United Conveyor Corporation, with<br />
prejudice, and there being no opposition thereto.<br />
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and<br />
crossclaims against defendant, United Conveyor Corporation, be and the<br />
same are hereby dismissed with pre<br />
Dhout costs.<br />
, GAROFALO<br />
Attorneys for Plaintiff<br />
& FLINN<br />
700 Broadway Attorneys for Defendant,<br />
New York, New York 10003<br />
United Conveyor Corporation<br />
72 Eagle Rock Avenue, Suite 350<br />
P.O. Box 438<br />
East Hanover, New Jersey 07936<br />
SO ORDERED,<br />
Honora6r6 S hwy Klein Heitler<br />
APR 1520<strong>11</strong><br />
,
536.07703/AJM<br />
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW<br />
COUNTY OF NEW YORK<br />
IN RE: NEW YORK CITY<br />
ASBESTOS LITIGATION :<br />
This document relates to:<br />
RUDOLPH BIBOW,<br />
YORK<br />
NY CAL<br />
TAS PART 30<br />
(Honorable Sherry Klein Heitler)<br />
Index No, :<br />
VS .<br />
Plaintiff,<br />
(January 20<strong>11</strong> Monthly FIFO<br />
Group)<br />
Trial<br />
JNITED CONVEYOR CORPORATION,<br />
2t al.,<br />
Defendants.<br />
NO OPPOSITION<br />
SUMMARY JUD(;MENT MOTION<br />
AN13 ORDER<br />
WHEREFORE, defendant,<br />
United Conveyor Corporation, ..ereby<br />
n<br />
requests summary judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to<br />
:ivil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212, dismissing plaintiff's<br />
romplaint against defendant, United Conveyor Corporation, with<br />
rrejudice, and there being no opposition thereto.<br />
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and<br />
rossclaims against defendant, United Conveyor Corporation, be and the<br />
- -<br />
arne are hereby dismissed wit<br />
without costs.<br />
APR 2 6 20<strong>11</strong><br />
URPHY , GAROFALO<br />
& FLINN<br />
00 Broadway Attorneys for Defendant,<br />
ew York, New York 10003<br />
United Conveyor Corporation<br />
72 Eagle Rock Avenue, Suite 350<br />
, Box 438<br />
t Hanover, New Jersey 07936<br />
SO ORDERED,
536.07703/AJM<br />
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK<br />
COUNTY OF NEW YORK<br />
IN RE: NEW YORK CITY<br />
NYCAL<br />
ASBESTOS LITIGATION : IAS PART 30<br />
(Honorable Sherry Klein Heitler)<br />
This document relates to:<br />
BERTRAND E. LINDSEY,<br />
: Index No.:<br />
2-y<br />
Plaintiff,<br />
: (January 20<strong>11</strong> Monthly FIFO Trial<br />
VS . : Group)<br />
JNITED CONVEYOR CORPORATIONf<br />
?t al., : NO OPPOSITION<br />
: SUMMARY JUDGMENT MOTION<br />
Defendants. : AND ORDER<br />
WHEREFORE:,<br />
defendant, United Conveyor Corporation, hereby<br />
-equests summary judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to<br />
livil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212, dismissing plaintiff’s<br />
‘omplaint against defendant, United Conveyor Corporation, with<br />
rejudice, and there being no opposition thereto.<br />
ORDEFlED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and<br />
rossclaims against defendant, United Conveyor Corporation,<br />
ame are hereby dismissed with prejudice and wi6hout.’&&?s.<br />
rn<br />
T;z<br />
and the<br />
, I I )<br />
2, ,j zQI~<br />
4ttorneys for Plain<br />
700 Broadway Attorneys for Defendant,<br />
\Jew York, New York 10003<br />
United Conveyor Corporation<br />
72 Eagle Rock Avenue, Suite 350<br />
P.O. Box 438<br />
East Hanover, New Jersey 07936<br />
SO ORDERED,
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK<br />
ALL COUNTIES WITHIN NEW YORK CITY<br />
_____________________________________ -X<br />
IN RE: NEW YORK COUNTY<br />
ASBESTOS LITIGATION<br />
___________________f_____________f____<br />
X<br />
This Document Relates to:<br />
Thomas J. Sheehan,<br />
NYCAL<br />
I.A.S. Part 30<br />
(Judge Heitler)<br />
Index NO.: 120770/01<br />
A.C. Ei<br />
- against -<br />
S., Inc., et al.,<br />
Plaintiff,<br />
NO ciPPOSITION<br />
SUMMARY JUDGMENT<br />
MOTION AND ORDER<br />
Inc., hereby requests<br />
summary judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil<br />
Practice Law and Rules Section 83212, dismissing plaintiffs’<br />
Complaint against defendant Goulds Pumps Inc., with prejudice,<br />
and there being no opposition thereto,<br />
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, a<strong>11</strong> claims<br />
and cross claims against defendant Goulds Pumps Inc., be<br />
dismissed with prejudice and without costs.<br />
Dated:<br />
Brooklyn, New York<br />
Attorneys for Plaintiff<br />
Attorneys for Defendant<br />
Thomas J. Sheehan<br />
Goulds Pumps Inc.<br />
700 Broadway, 6th Floor 177 Montague Street<br />
New York, New York 10003 Brooklyn, New York <strong>11</strong>201<br />
So Ordered:<br />
ile No.: 67g-&&<br />
E D<br />
APR 2 6 20<strong>11</strong>
------------ff-ff-f-_fl------------------<br />
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK<br />
ALL COUNTIES WITHIN NEW YORK CITY<br />
X NYCAL<br />
IN RE: NEW YORK COUNTY I.A.S. Part 30<br />
ASBESTOS LITIGATION<br />
(Judge Heitler)<br />
..................................... -X<br />
This Document Relates to: Index No.: 120770/01<br />
Thomas J. Sheehan,<br />
Plaintiff,<br />
- against - NO OPPOSITION<br />
A.C. & S., Inc., et al.,<br />
SUMMARY JUDGMENT<br />
MOTION AND ORDER<br />
Defendants.<br />
-X<br />
WHEREFORE, defendant Burnham LLC, hereby requests surnrnar<br />
judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practic<br />
Law and Rules Section 83212, dismissing plaintiffs' Complain<br />
against defendant Burnham LLC, with prejudice, and there beinl<br />
no opposition thereto,<br />
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claim<br />
and cross claims against defendant Burnham LLC, be dismissel<br />
with prejudice and without costs.<br />
Dated:<br />
Breoklyn, New York<br />
, 20<strong>11</strong><br />
Weitz & Luxenberg, P.C.<br />
Attorneys for Plaintiff<br />
Thomas J. Sheehan<br />
700 Broadway, 6th Floor<br />
New York, New York 10003<br />
So Ordered:<br />
Defendant<br />
Burnham LLC<br />
177 Montague Street<br />
Brooklyn,<br />
UT File NO. : ?lO84-2528<br />
APR 2 6 20<strong>11</strong>
536.07695/AJM<br />
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK<br />
COUNTY OF NEW YORK<br />
IN RE: NEW YORK CITY<br />
ASBESTOS LITIGATION :<br />
This document relates to:<br />
NATALE V. GRILLO,<br />
NY CAL<br />
IAS PART 30<br />
(Honorable Sherry Klein Heitler)<br />
Index No. :<br />
vs *<br />
Plaintiff,<br />
(January 20<strong>11</strong> Monthly FIFO Trial<br />
Group)<br />
iTCu'iTbZl CSi
WHEREFORE, defendant Goulds Pumps Inc. hereby requests summary judgment in the aboveentitled<br />
case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212, dismissing plaintiff's complaint<br />
against defendant Goulds Pumps Inc.. with prejudice, and there being no opposition thereto,<br />
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against defendant<br />
Goulds Pumps Inc., be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and without costs.<br />
Dated: New York, New York<br />
Attorney for Plaintiff<br />
LEVY, PHILLIPS & KONIGSBERG, LLP<br />
800 Third Avenue, 1 lth Floor<br />
New York, New York 10022<br />
CULLEN & DYKMAN LLP<br />
SO ORDERED,<br />
Hon. Sherry K. Heitler<br />
002239<strong>04</strong>. WPD
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK<br />
COUNTY OF NEW YORK<br />
In Re: NEW YORK CITYASBESTOS LITIGATION<br />
Index No.: 01/121697<br />
GEORGE RENZ,<br />
Plaintiff( s),<br />
NO OPPOSITION<br />
SUMMARY JUDGMENT<br />
- against - MOTION<br />
AC and S, WC., (ARMSGTRONG<br />
CONTRACTING & SUPPLY) et al.,<br />
Defendants.<br />
WHEREFORE, Defendant WEIL-MCLAIN COMPANY, INC., hereinafter ("WEIL-<br />
MCLAN') hereby requests Summary Judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil<br />
Practice Law and Rules Section 3212, dismissing plaintiff's complaint against Defendant Weil-<br />
McLain with prejudice, and there being no opposition thereto,<br />
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against<br />
Defendant, Weil-McLain be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and without costs<br />
to either party.<br />
(%2JjK ,20<strong>11</strong><br />
Erica Cesaro, Esq.<br />
Levy Phillips<br />
800 Third Ave. 13th Floor<br />
New York, NY 10022<br />
SO ORDERED,<br />
SEGAL McCAMBRIDGE<br />
SINGER & MAHONEY, LTD.<br />
Attorneys for Defendant<br />
Weil-McLain<br />
850 Third Avenue, Suite <strong>11</strong>00 Go'<br />
New York, NY 10022<br />
(212) 651-7500<br />
itler<br />
p R 2 6 zo'
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK<br />
COUNTY OF NEW YORK<br />
GEORGE RENZ, et al.,<br />
Plaintiff's,<br />
: NYCAI,<br />
: I.A.S. Part 30<br />
: (Hon. Sherry Klein Heitler)<br />
-against-<br />
: Index No: 12 1 697-0 1<br />
A.C. &L S., INC., et al.,<br />
Ikfendants.<br />
NO-OPPOSITION SUMMARY<br />
: JUDGMENT MOTlON AND ORDER<br />
above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Sectioii 3212, dismissing<br />
plaintiff's complaint against CRANE C:O. with prejudice, and there being no opposition thereto,<br />
ORDEKED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against<br />
CRANE CO. be, and the same are hereby, disniissed with prejudice and without costs.<br />
LEVY 'PHILLIPS & KONIGSBEKG, LLP<br />
Attorneys for Plaiiitiff(s)<br />
800 Third Avenue<br />
New York, NY 10022<br />
(2 12) 605-6200<br />
SO ORDERED.<br />
Hon.<br />
cl n ,A -I---<br />
CRhE C'O.<br />
599 Lexington Avenue<br />
Ncw York, NY 10022-<br />
(212) 536 -3900
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK<br />
ALL COUNTIES WITHIN NEW YORK CITY<br />
lrl_l--llll---------_l------------------<br />
X NYCAL<br />
IN RE: NEW YORK COUNTY I.A.S. Part 30<br />
ASBESTOS LITIGATION<br />
(Judge Heitlex)<br />
...................................... X<br />
-<br />
This Document Relates to:<br />
Index No.:121697/01<br />
George Renz,<br />
NO-OPPOSITION<br />
Plaintiff,<br />
SUMMARY JUDQMENT<br />
- against -<br />
GOULDS PUMPS, INC.,<br />
et al.,<br />
WHEREFORE, defendant GOULDS PUMPS, INC. , hereby requests<br />
summary judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil<br />
Practice Law and Rules Section 83212, dismissing plaintiffs’<br />
Complaint against defendant GOULDS PUMPS, INC., with prejudice,<br />
and there being no opposition thereto,<br />
ORDERED, that upon natice to all co-defendants, all claims<br />
and cross claims against defendant QOULDS PUMPS, INC., be<br />
dismissed with prejudice and without coets.<br />
q A G k l y n , Ne; ;!<br />
4 I1<br />
Erica Cesaro, Esq.<br />
Levy, Philips & Konigsberg<br />
Attorneys for Plaintiff<br />
Cullen and Dykman, LLP<br />
Attorneys for DefeIIdantApfj 2 20<strong>11</strong><br />
George Renz GOULD$ PUMPS, INC.<br />
800 Third Avenue<br />
177 Montague Street<br />
Brooklyn, New York <strong>11</strong>2d%-bl’i ’YO1<br />
New York, NY 10022 (718) ,855-9000 COUNTYCLERK’SOFFICIi<br />
(212) 605-6333 &d Our Fil.9 NO. :6754-6483<br />
So Ordered: 3<br />
Han . Sher’ry K. HeiCler
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK<br />
COUNTY OF NEW YORK<br />
IN RE:<br />
NEW YORK CITY<br />
ASBESTOS LIT1 GAT1 ON<br />
I.A.S. Part 30<br />
(Heitler, J.)<br />
This Document Relates to:<br />
FRANK M. BARBERA AS PERSONAL<br />
REPRESENTATIVE FOR THE ESTATE OF FRANK<br />
S. BARBERA<br />
INDEX NO.: 01-121734<br />
NO OPPOSITION<br />
SUMMARY JUDGMENT<br />
MOTION AND ORDER<br />
against<br />
A.C. AND S. INC. ET AL.<br />
WHEREFORE, defendant, Kohler Co., hereby requests summary judgment in the<br />
above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212, dismissing plaintiffs'<br />
complaint against defendant, Kohler Co., with prejudice, and there being no opposition thereto,<br />
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against<br />
defendant, Kohler Co., be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and without costs.<br />
DATED:<br />
NEW YORK, New York<br />
HOAGLAND, LONGO, MORAN<br />
WEITZ & LUXENBERG<br />
DUNST & DOUKAS, LLP<br />
Attorneys for Plaintiff (s),<br />
Attorneys for Defendant, FRANK M. BARBERA as Personal<br />
Kohler Cob Representative for the Estate of FRANK S.<br />
40 Paterson Street - PO Box 480 BARBERA<br />
New Brunswick, New Jersey 08903 k, New York, 10003<br />
HOAQLAM), LONGO<br />
MORAN, DUNST 8<br />
DWKAS, LLP<br />
ATTORNEYS dT LAW<br />
NORTH JERSEY<br />
40 PATERSON ST<br />
PO BOX 480<br />
NWVBRUNSWIC<strong>11</strong>. NJ<br />
SOUTH JERSEY<br />
701 WILTSEY'S MILL RD<br />
SUITE 2M<br />
HAMONTON. NJ<br />
SO ORDERED:<br />
Hon. Sherk Klein '<br />
L E D<br />
APR 2 6 2071<br />
NEW YORK<br />
COUNTY CLERK'S OFF\@
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK<br />
COUNTY OF NEW YORK<br />
WHEREFORE, defendant Patterson-Kelley Company, sued herein as Patterson-Kelley<br />
Division, hereby requests summary judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil<br />
Practice Law and Rules Section 3212, dismissing plaintiffs complaint against defendant<br />
Patterson-Kelley Division with prejudice, and there being no opposition thereto,<br />
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against<br />
defendant Patterson-Kelley Division, be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and<br />
without costs.<br />
Dated: New York, NY<br />
By:<br />
WEITZ & LUXENBERG, P.C.<br />
Attorneys for Plaintiff<br />
180 Maiden Lane<br />
New York, NY 10038<br />
(212) 558-5500<br />
SO ORDERED,<br />
NIXON PEABODY LLP<br />
Attorneys for Defendant,<br />
Patterson-Kelley Corn any<br />
Key Towers at Fo$&'lb<br />
40 Fountain Plaza, uite 500<br />
Buffalo, NY 14202<br />
(716)853-8100 APR 'O'<br />
p.\EW YORK<br />
C.u~n CLERK'S OFFICE<br />
APR 15 20<strong>11</strong><br />
13409973.1
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK<br />
COIJN‘I’Y OF NEW YORK<br />
PATRICK MOONEY and ARLENE W<br />
MOONEY,<br />
A.C. & S., INC., et al.,<br />
-against-<br />
PI ain t i ffs,<br />
. NYCAL<br />
: I.A.S. Part 30<br />
: (Hon. Sherry Klein I Icitler)<br />
: Index No(s): 124089-01<br />
: NO-OPPOSITION SUMMARY<br />
’ ,JUDGMENT MOTION AND ORDER<br />
above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212, dismissing<br />
plaintiffs’ complaint against CRANE CO. with prejudice, and there being no opposition thereto,<br />
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against<br />
CRANE CO. be, and the same are hereby, dismissed with prejudice and without costs.<br />
NIGSBERG, L1,P<br />
Attorneys for Plaintiff(s)<br />
800 Third Avenue<br />
*YL!<br />
i Alford Kneis, Esq.<br />
F\LED<br />
New Y ork, NY 10022 599 Lexington Avenuc 2D77<br />
(212) 60.5-6200 New York, NY 10022-6030 aPR<br />
SO OKDERGD,
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK<br />
COUNTY OF NEW YORK<br />
WHEREFORE, defendant Patterson-Kelley Company, sued herein as Patterson-Kelley<br />
Division, hereby requests summary judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil<br />
Practice Law and Rules Section 3212, dismissing plaintiffs complaint against defendant<br />
Patterson-Kelley Division with prejudice, and there being no opposition thereto,<br />
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against<br />
defendant Patterson-Kelley Division, be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and<br />
without costs.<br />
f<br />
hiULcu\ hil~<br />
, Esq.<br />
WEITZ & LUXENBERG, P.C.<br />
Attorneys for Plaintiff<br />
By: ??!!<br />
Samuel Goldblatt, Es .<br />
Benjamin R. Dwyer sq.<br />
NIXON PEABODY LLP<br />
Attorneys for Defendant,<br />
180 Maiden Lane Patterson-Kelley Company<br />
New York, NY 10038<br />
Key Towers at Fountain Plaza<br />
40 Fountain Plaza, S<br />
Buffalo, NY 14202<br />
__,"_^
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK<br />
ALL COUNTIES WITHIN NEW YORX CITY<br />
........................................ X<br />
IN RE:<br />
NEW YORK COUNTY<br />
ASBESTOS LITIGATION<br />
_I-ll__ll_l---_f____------------------<br />
This Document Relates to:<br />
RICHARD GRABINSKY,<br />
- against -<br />
A,C. & S. TNC,, et al.,<br />
Plaintiff,<br />
X<br />
NY CAL<br />
I.A.S, Part 30<br />
(Judge Hei t ler 1<br />
Index N0.:100373/02<br />
NO-OPPOSITION<br />
SUMMARY JUDGMENT<br />
MOTION AND QRD ER<br />
WHEREFORE, defendant BURNHAM, LLC, hereby requests summar)<br />
judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Lar<br />
and Rules Section 53212, dismissing plaintiffs' Complaint against<br />
defendant; BURNNAM, LLC, with prejudice, and there being nc<br />
opposition thereto,<br />
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims am<br />
cross claims against defendant BURNHAM, LLC, be dismissed wit1<br />
TLag<br />
prejudice and without costs.<br />
Ne: ;:<br />
GSbLCk\j Qsw2 I<br />
Esq*<br />
Levy Phillips & Konigsberg<br />
Attorneys for Plaintiff<br />
X ICHARW GRABINSKY<br />
800 Third Avenue,llth Floor<br />
New York, New York 10022<br />
So Ordered:<br />
Cullen and Dykman LLP<br />
Attorneys for Defendant<br />
BURNKAM, LLC<br />
177 Montague Street<br />
Brooklyn, New York<br />
(718) 855-9000<br />
UT File No. :<strong>11</strong>084-249ap~ 20,,<br />
NEW YORK<br />
COUNTY CLERK'S<br />
CE'
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK<br />
COUNTY OF NEW YORK<br />
IN RE:<br />
NEW YORK CITY<br />
ASBESTOS LITIGATION<br />
CHARLES CARUSO SR.<br />
NYCAL<br />
I.A.S. Part 30<br />
(Heitler, S.)<br />
Index No. 02- 10<strong>04</strong>6 1<br />
NO OPPOSITION<br />
SUMMARY<br />
JUDGMENT<br />
MOTION AND ORDER<br />
WHEREFORE, defendant Patterson-Kelley Company, su<br />
d herein as Patterson-Kellel<br />
Division, hereby requests summary judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil<br />
Practice Law and Rules Section 3212, dismissing plaintiff's complaint against defendant<br />
Patterson-Kelley Division with prejudice, and there being no opposition thereto,<br />
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against<br />
defendant Patterson-Kelley Division, be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and<br />
without costs.<br />
By:<br />
WEITZ & LUXENBERG, P.C.<br />
Attorneys for Plaintiff<br />
180 Maiden Lane<br />
New York, NY 1003 8<br />
Benjamin R. Dwyer Esq.<br />
NIXON PEABODY LLP<br />
Attorneys for Defendant,<br />
Patterson-Kelley<br />
Key Towers at F<br />
&TXAE D<br />
(212) 558-5500 40 Fountain Plaza, Suite 500<br />
Buffalo, NY 14202 APR 20,,<br />
(716) 853-8100<br />
SO ORDERED,<br />
Hon. Sherry Klein Heitler<br />
iFd \"ORB.;<br />
COUNTY CLERK'S OFF=*<br />
13409973.1
TMc:CCCjpk)<br />
3123<strong>11</strong> 1<br />
INDEX NO.<br />
1 0 1 08 8/02<br />
ASSIGNED TO:<br />
HON. SHERRY KLEIN HEITLER<br />
FRANK PERRY<br />
NO OPPOSITION SUMMARY<br />
JUDGMENT MOTION AND<br />
ORDER<br />
WHEREFORE, defendant Consolidated Edison Company of New York, Inc.<br />
hereby requests summary judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law<br />
and Rules Section 3212, dismissing plaintiff's complaint against defendant Consolidated Edison<br />
Company of New York, Inc. with prejudice, and there being no opposition thereto,<br />
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross-claims<br />
against defendant Consolidated Edison Company of New York, Inc., be and the same are hereby<br />
dismissed with prejudice and without costs.<br />
Dated: New York, New York<br />
Jo6dRichmond, Esq.<br />
WEITZ & LUXENBERG, P.C.<br />
Attorneys for Plaintiff<br />
700 Broadway<br />
New York, NY 10003 5<br />
1<br />
York, Inc.<br />
4 Irving Place<br />
York, NY 100<br />
08b E D<br />
SO ORDERED: APR 2 6 20<strong>11</strong><br />
Our File No<br />
S-7422-0 1<br />
15 20<strong>11</strong><br />
NEW YORK<br />
COUNTY CLERK'S OFFIe
536.09778/AJM<br />
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK<br />
COUNTY OF NEW YORK<br />
IN RE: NEW YORK CITY<br />
NYCAL<br />
ASBESTOS LITIGATION : IAS PART 30<br />
(Honorable Sherry Klein Heitler)<br />
This document relates to:<br />
JAMES R. FLEMING, Deceased,<br />
: Index No. :<br />
vs "<br />
Plaintiff ,<br />
(January 20<strong>11</strong> Monthly FIFO Trial<br />
Group)<br />
UNITED CONVEYOR CORPORATION,<br />
et al. ,<br />
Defendants ,<br />
NO OPPOSITION<br />
SUMMARY JUDGMENT MOTION<br />
: AND ORDER<br />
WHEREFOFE,<br />
defenda'nt, United Conveyor Corporation, hereby<br />
requests summary judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to<br />
livil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212, dismissing plaintiff's<br />
lomplaint<br />
against defendant, United Conveyor Corporation, with<br />
xejudice, and there being no opposition thereto.<br />
ORDERED,<br />
that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and<br />
:rossclairns against defendant, United Conveyor Corporation, be and the<br />
;ame are hereby dismissed with pre<br />
IATED : 3 '- ?fN //<br />
APR 2 6 20<strong>11</strong><br />
hout costs.<br />
lEITZ & LUXENBERE<br />
GAROFALO<br />
,ttorneys for Plaintiff<br />
& FLINN<br />
'00 Broadway Attorneys for Defendant,<br />
lew York, New York 10003<br />
United Conveyor Corporation<br />
72 Eagle Rock Avenue, Suite 350<br />
P.O. Box 438<br />
East Hanover, New Jersey 07936<br />
0 ORDERED,
536.10564/AJM<br />
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK<br />
COUNTY OF NEW YORK<br />
IN RE: NEW YORK CITY : NYCAL<br />
ASBESTOS LITIGATION : IAS PART 30<br />
(Honorable Sh<br />
This document relates to:<br />
: Index No. :<br />
RAYMOND J. HICKEY,<br />
:y Klein Heitl<br />
vs .<br />
Plaintiff,<br />
: (January 20<strong>11</strong> Monthly FIFO Trial<br />
: Group)<br />
UNITED CONVEYOR CORPORATION, : NO OPPOSITION<br />
et al. , : SUMMARY JUDGMENT MOTION<br />
: AND ORDER<br />
Defendants.<br />
WHEREFORE,<br />
defendant, United ' Conveyor Corporation, hereby<br />
requests summary judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to<br />
Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212, dismissing plaintiff's<br />
Complaint against defendant, United Conveyor Corporation, with<br />
prejudice, and there being no opposition thereto.<br />
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and<br />
zrossclaims against defendant, United Conveyor Corporation, be and the<br />
same are hereby dismissed with Dwitbout costs *<br />
GARRITY, GFLAHAM, MURPHY , GAROFALO<br />
Zttorneys for Plaintiff<br />
700 Broadway Attorneys for Defendant,<br />
\Tew York, New York 10003<br />
United Conveyor Corporation<br />
72 Eagle Rock Avenue, Suite 350<br />
P.O. Box 438<br />
East Hanover, New Jersey 07936<br />
SO ORDERED,
SUPREME COUK‘I’ OF ‘I’HE STATE OF NEW YORK<br />
COIJN’I’Y OF NEW YORK<br />
’ NYCAL<br />
CAKOL E. ANGELONE, Iiidividually and as<br />
’ I.A.S. Part 30<br />
Executrix ol’the Estate of RUSSELL ANGELONE, : (I-,oll.<br />
Heil,er)<br />
et al.,<br />
Plaintiffs,<br />
* Index No: 1<strong>04</strong>919-02<br />
A.C. & S., INC., et al.,<br />
-against-<br />
: NO-OPPOSITION SUMMARY<br />
: JUDGMENT MOTION AND ORDER<br />
Defendants.<br />
________________________________________-----------------~----~-~<br />
x<br />
WHEREFORE, defendant CRANE CO., on behalf’of named defendants CRANE CO.,<br />
CRANE PUMPS & SYSTEMS, INC. and WEINMAN PUMPS, division of Crane Pumps &<br />
Systems, Inc. (“CRANE CO.”), hereby requests summary judgment in thc above-entitled case,<br />
pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 32 12, dismissing plaintiffs’ complaint against<br />
CKAN E C‘O. with prejudice, and there being no opposition thereto,<br />
ORDERED, that upoii notice to all co-defendants, all claim and cross claims against<br />
C‘KANE CO. be, and the same are hereby, dismissed with prejudice and without costs.<br />
Attorneys for Plaintiff(s)<br />
800 Third Avenue<br />
New York, NY 10022<br />
599 Lexington Avenue<br />
(212) 605-6200 w York, NY 10022-6030<br />
SO ORDERED,
I NO.<br />
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK<br />
ALL COUNTIES WITHIN NEW YORK CITY<br />
----------____l--llllr_____________lr_<br />
X NYCAL<br />
IN RE: NEW YORK COUNTY I.A.S. Part 30<br />
ASBESTOS LITIGATION<br />
(Judge Heitler)<br />
-I--l-t------r-r-ll___l__ll__l___f____<br />
X<br />
This Document Relates To: Index<br />
-<br />
No.: 1<strong>04</strong>919/02<br />
CAROL E. ANGELONE, as Executrix of<br />
the Estate of RUSSELL ANGELONE,<br />
NO-OPP081TION<br />
Plaintiff,<br />
SlJMMARY JUDGMENT<br />
- againet -<br />
GOULDS PUMPS, INC., et al,,<br />
WHEREFOREf defendant GOULDS PUMPS, INC., hereby requests<br />
summary judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil<br />
Practice Law and Rules Section 83212, dismissing plaintiffs'<br />
Complaint against defendant GOULDS PUMPS, INC., with prejudice,<br />
and there being no opposition thereto,<br />
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims<br />
and cros8 claima againet defendant GOULDS PUMPS, INC., be<br />
FC??,,<br />
dismissed with prejudice and without costs,<br />
,New York 20<strong>11</strong><br />
Erica Cesaro, Esq.<br />
Levy, Philips & Konigsberg Cullen and Dykman, LLP<br />
Attorneys for Plaintiff Attorneys for Defendant<br />
Ru~sell Anqelone<br />
-<br />
GOULDS PUMPS, INC. APR 2 6 20<strong>11</strong><br />
800 Third Avenue<br />
177 Montague Street<br />
New York, NY 10022<br />
Brooklyn, New York <strong>11</strong>201 NEW yORt,'<br />
(212) 605-6333<br />
:6754-740<br />
(718) 855-9000 eOUNlY CLERK'S Clr r IGI<br />
So Ordered:<br />
APR 1520<strong>11</strong>
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK<br />
COUNTY OF NEW Y ON<br />
-7<br />
MOTION ANR ORDER<br />
WHEREFORE, defendant Patterson-Kelley Company, sued herein as Patterson-Kelley<br />
I<br />
Division, hereby requests summary judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil<br />
Practice Law and Rules Section 3212, dismissing plaintiffs complaint against defendant<br />
Patterson-Kelley Division with prejudice, and there being no opposition thereto,<br />
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against<br />
defendant Patterson-Kelley Division, be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and<br />
without costs,<br />
Dated: New York, NY<br />
Dana Northcraft, Esq.<br />
WEITZ & LUXENBERG, P.C.<br />
Attorneys for Plaintiff<br />
180 Maiden Lane<br />
New York, NY 10038<br />
(212) 558-5500<br />
- ' .VI..>_<br />
By:<br />
Samuel Goldblatt, Es&<br />
Benjamin R. Dwyer Esq.<br />
NIXON PEABODY LLP<br />
Attorneys for Defendant,<br />
Patterson-Kelle y Com<br />
Key Towers at Founta<br />
40 Fountain Plaza, Sui<br />
Buffalo, NY 14202<br />
..-. . (716) 853-8100 APR 2 6 20"<br />
SO ORDERE pi;i$j y9RK<br />
Hon. Sherry Klein Heitler cour\r-iy CLERK'S OFFICE<br />
13381246.1 APR 1520<strong>11</strong>
536.10562/AJM<br />
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK<br />
COUNTY OF NEW YORK<br />
IN RE: NEW YORK CITY<br />
NYCAL<br />
ASBESTOS LITIGATION : IAS PART 30<br />
(Honorable Sherry K-iin Heitler)<br />
This document relates to:<br />
CARMELO A. FICALORA,<br />
: Index No.: 120388<br />
vs *<br />
Plaintiff,<br />
c<br />
: (January 20<strong>11</strong> Monthly FIFO Trial<br />
: Group)<br />
JNITED CONVEYOR CORPORATION, : NO OPPOSITION<br />
st al. , : SUMMARY JUDGMENT MOTION<br />
: AND ORDER<br />
Defendants.<br />
WHEREFORE,<br />
defendant, United Conveyor Corporation, hereby<br />
requests summary judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to<br />
livil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212, dismissing plaintiff's<br />
lomplaint against defendant, United Conveyor Corporation, with<br />
rejudice, and there being no opposition thereto.<br />
ORDERED,<br />
that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and<br />
!rossclaims against defendant, United Conveyor Corporation, be and the<br />
lame are hereby dismissed with pr<br />
IATED : lfl&p!, V, 7 0 I /<br />
ast Hanover New Jersey<br />
hout costs.<br />
EITZ & LUXENBERG<br />
ttorneys for Plaintiff<br />
& FLINN<br />
00 Broadway Attorneys for Defendant,<br />
ew York, New York 10003<br />
United Conveyor Corporation<br />
72 Eagle Rock Avenue, Suite 350<br />
P.O. Box 438<br />
East Hanover, New Jersey 07936<br />
0 ORDERED,
536.10562/AJM<br />
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF<br />
COUNTY OF NEW YORK<br />
JEW YOR<br />
IN RE: NEW YORK CITY<br />
ASBESTOS LITIGATION :<br />
This document relates to:<br />
NYCAL<br />
IAS PART 30<br />
(Honorable Sherry Klein Heitler)<br />
ANGEL0 T. D’AGOSTINO,<br />
vs .<br />
Plaintiff,<br />
(January 20<strong>11</strong> Monthly FIFO Trial<br />
Group)<br />
JTJITEI? CDWJEVOR CORP9FATI@l’?,<br />
zt al. ,<br />
Defendants.<br />
NO BEJPQSITION<br />
SUMMARY JUDGMENT MOTION<br />
AND ORDER<br />
WHEREFORE,<br />
defendant, United Conveyor Corporation, hereby<br />
requests summary judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to<br />
livil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212, dismissing plaintiff’s<br />
*omplaint against defendant, United Conveyor Corporation, with<br />
rejudice, and there being no opposition thereto.<br />
ORDERED,<br />
that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and<br />
irossclaims against defendant, United Conveyor Corporation, be<br />
,ame are hereby dismissed with prejudice and withoutteo<br />
zp7<br />
e<br />
lATED :<br />
v *‘Y/ ,,, v- - --<br />
EITZ & LUXENBERG<br />
GARRITY, GRAHAM, MURPHY, GAROFALO<br />
ttorneys for Plaintiff<br />
& FLINN<br />
00 Broadway Attorneys for Defendant,<br />
ew York, New York 10003<br />
United Conveyor Corporation<br />
72 Eagle Rock Avenue, Suite 350<br />
**.--.E 0 * Box 438<br />
East Hanover, New Jersey 07936<br />
0 ORDERED,<br />
Honorable Sherry Klein Heitler
TMc:CC(jpk)<br />
3123<strong>11</strong> 1<br />
SUPREME COURT : ALL COUNTIES<br />
WHEREFORE, defendant Consolidated Edison Company of New York, Inc.<br />
hereby requests summary judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law<br />
and Rules Section 3212, dismissing plaintiffs complaint against defendant Consolidated Edison<br />
Company of New York, Inc. with prejudice, and there being no opposition thereto,<br />
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross-claims<br />
against defendant Consolidated Edison Company of New York, Inc., be and the same are hereby<br />
dismissed with prejudice and without costs.<br />
Dated: New York, New York<br />
Y/Jl/l<br />
WEITZ & LUXENBERG, P.C.<br />
Attorneys for Plaintiff<br />
700 Broadway<br />
New York, NY 100035<br />
York, Inc.<br />
4 Irving Place<br />
NewYork,NY<br />
SO ORDERED: ApR 2 6 20"<br />
Our File No<br />
S-4640-02
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK<br />
COUNTY OF NEW YORK<br />
IN RE:<br />
NEW YORK CITY<br />
ASBESTOS LITIGATION<br />
NYCAL<br />
I.A.S. Part 30<br />
(Heitler, S.)<br />
Index No. 02- 1 10<strong>26</strong>9<br />
THIS DOCUMENT RELATES TO:<br />
CLINTON McCLOUD<br />
NO OPPOSITION<br />
SUMMARY<br />
JUDGMENT<br />
MOTION AND ORDER<br />
WHEREFORE, defendant Patterson-Kelley Company, su<br />
d herein as Patterson-Kelley<br />
Division, hereby requests summary judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil<br />
Practice Law and Rules Section 3212, dismissing plaintiff's complaint against defendant<br />
Patterson-Kelley Division with prejudice, and there being no opposition thereto,<br />
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against<br />
defendant Patterson-Kelley Division, be and the same are hereby dismissed<br />
without costs.<br />
W YORK
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK<br />
COUNTY OF NEW YORK<br />
PHYLLIS GACH, Individually and as Proposed<br />
Executrix for the Estate of MICHAEL GACH,<br />
A.C. & S., INC., et al.,<br />
Plaintiff(s),<br />
-against-<br />
Defendants,<br />
I.A.S. Part 30<br />
(Hon. Sherry Klein Heitler)<br />
121985-99<br />
NO-OPPOSITION SUMMARY<br />
: JUDGMENT MOTION AND<br />
ORDER<br />
WHEREFORE, defendant CRANE CO. hereby requests summary judgment in the<br />
above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212, dismissing<br />
plaintiffs complaint against defendant CMNE CO. with prejudice, and there being no<br />
opposition thereto,<br />
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against<br />
defendant CRANE CO. be, and the same are hereby, dismissed with prejudice and without costs,<br />
Dated:<br />
3 \>a\ I\.<br />
Attorneys for Plaintiff(s)<br />
700 Broadway CRANE CO.<br />
New York, NY 10003<br />
(212) 558-5500 New York, NY 10022<br />
(212) 536-3900<br />
APR 2 6 2071<br />
SO ORDERED,<br />
Hon, Sherry Klein Heitler<br />
FbV VOR&<br />
cwcu i Y CLER&S oFF/a
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK<br />
ALL COUNTIES WITHIN NEW YORK CITY<br />
___________________-------------------<br />
X NYCAL<br />
IN RE: NEW YORK COUNTY I.A.S. Part 30<br />
ASBESTOS LITIGATION<br />
(Judge Heitler)<br />
___________________-------------------<br />
X<br />
This Document Relates to: Index No.: <strong>11</strong>2375/02<br />
MICHAEL GACH<br />
NO-OPPOSITION<br />
SUMMARY JUDGMENT<br />
Plaintiff ,<br />
MOTION AND ORDER<br />
- against -<br />
WHEREFORE,<br />
defendant BURNHAM LLC, hereby requests summary<br />
judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law<br />
and Rules Section 53212, dismissing plaintiffs' Complaint against:<br />
defendant BURNHAM LLC, with prejudice, and there being no<br />
opposition thereto,<br />
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and<br />
cross claims against defendant BURNHAM LLC, be dismissed with<br />
prejudice and without costs.<br />
2 6 20<strong>11</strong>
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK<br />
COUNTY OF NEW YORK<br />
IN RE: NEW YORK COUNTY i NYCAL<br />
ASBESTOS LITIGATION<br />
THIS DOCUMENT REFERS TO:<br />
i I.A.S. Part 30<br />
! (Heitler, J.)<br />
i Index No.: <strong>11</strong>4483/02<br />
GRACE CONTI, INDIVIDUALLY AND AS<br />
EXECUTRIX FOR THE ESTATE OF VITO<br />
CONTI, i NO OPPOSITION<br />
j SUMMARY JUDGMENT<br />
Plaintiffs, i MOTION AND ORDER<br />
-against-<br />
A. C. & S., INC., et ai.,<br />
Defendants. :<br />
WHEREFORE, defendant, Oakfaco, Inc., hereby requests summary judgment in the<br />
above entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules 8 3212, dismissing plaintiffs’<br />
complaint against defendant, Oakfaco, Inc., with prejudice in this action, and there being no<br />
opposition thereto,<br />
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, a<strong>11</strong> claims and cross claims against<br />
defendant, Oakfaco, Inc., be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and without costs.<br />
Dated: New Ywk. New York<br />
Robert Darish, Esq.<br />
Attorney for Defendant<br />
Oakfaco, Inc.<br />
Estate of Vito Conti<br />
MCG~VNEY & KLUGER, P.C.<br />
WE~TZ & LUXENBERG, P.C.<br />
80 Broad Street-Suite 2300<br />
700 Broadway<br />
New York, New York 100<strong>04</strong> NewYork,NewYork10003 APR 2 6 20<strong>11</strong><br />
(212) 509-3456<br />
h \EV/ YORK<br />
SO ORDERED,<br />
COUNTY GLERKG’S OFFICE’<br />
2571-0132<br />
N0<strong>04</strong><strong>04</strong>78-1
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK<br />
ALL COUNTIES WITHIN NEW YORK CITY<br />
-l_l_----l--l-_--__-------------------<br />
X NYCAL<br />
IN RE: NEW YORK COUNTY I.A.S. Part 30<br />
ASBESTOS LITIGATION<br />
(Judge Heitler)<br />
X<br />
This Document Relates to: Index No.: <strong>11</strong>8207/02<br />
BERNARD SIKKAS<br />
NO-OPPOSITION<br />
SUMMARY JUDGMENT<br />
Plaintiff,<br />
MOTION AND ORDER<br />
- against -<br />
A.C. SI S., INC., et al.,<br />
Defendants.<br />
X<br />
WHEREFORE, defendant BURNHAM LLC, hereby requests summary<br />
judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law<br />
and Rules Section 53212, dismissing plaintiffs' Complaint against<br />
defendant BURNHAM LLC, with prejudice, and there being no<br />
opposition thereto,<br />
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and<br />
cross claims against defendant BURNHAM LLC, be dismissed with<br />
prejudice and without costs.<br />
Weitz & Luxenberg, P<br />
Attorneys for Plaintiff<br />
Bernard Sikkas<br />
700 Broadway, 6th Floor<br />
New York, New York 10003<br />
212-558-5500<br />
SO ORDERED:<br />
Hon. Sherry K. Heitler<br />
Attorneys for Defendant<br />
Burnham LLC<br />
177 Montague Street<br />
Brooklyn, New York <strong>11</strong>201<br />
(718) 855-9000<br />
rpl.<br />
Our File No. : Eo K<br />
APK 2 6 20<strong>11</strong><br />
NEW YORK<br />
COUNTY CLERK'S OFFICE<br />
I
--<br />
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK<br />
ALL COUNTIES WITHIN NEW YORK CITY<br />
-X NYCAL<br />
IN RE: NEW YORK COUNTY<br />
I.A.S. Part 30<br />
ASBESTOS LITIGATION<br />
(Judge Heitler)<br />
--_________________-_________________ -X<br />
This Document Relates to:<br />
Index No.: <strong>11</strong>8207/02<br />
Jeanette Sikkas, Individually and as<br />
Executrix for the Estate of Bernard<br />
Sikkas,<br />
Plaintiff,<br />
- against -<br />
NO OPPOSITION<br />
SUMMARY JUDGMENT<br />
A.C. & S., Iric., et al. ,<br />
MOTION AND ORDER<br />
Defendants.<br />
__________________-__________________ -X<br />
WHEREFORE, defendant Mario & DiBono Plastering Co. Inc.,<br />
hereby requests summary judgment in the above-entitled case,<br />
pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section §3212,<br />
dismissing plaintiffs' Complaint against defendant Mario 6<br />
DiBono Plastering Co. Inc., with prejudice, and there being nc<br />
opposition thereto,<br />
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims<br />
and cross claims against defendant Mario & DiBono Plastering Co.<br />
Inc., be dismissed with prejudice and without c osF I L E D<br />
Dated:<br />
/y<br />
,2755 w/<br />
Brooklyn, New York<br />
<strong>11</strong><strong>11</strong>7 , 20<strong>11</strong><br />
Michael Fanelli, Esq.<br />
Weitz & Luxenberg, P.C.<br />
Attorneys for Plaintiff<br />
Jeanette Sikkas, Individually Mario & DiBono Plastering Co.<br />
and as Executrix for the Estate Inc.<br />
of Bernard Sikkas<br />
177 Montague Street<br />
700 Broadway, 6th Floor Brooklyn, New York <strong>11</strong>201<br />
New York, New York 1000 (718) 855-9000<br />
Our File No.: 10924-6459<br />
So Ordered:<br />
I 6QR<br />
I t 1,5?0ll
JOAN LEVESQUE as Administratrix for the Estate of JOSEPH<br />
LEVESQUE and JOAN LEVESQUE, Individually,<br />
NYCAL<br />
I.A.S. Part 30<br />
42z><br />
Hon. Sherry Klein Heitler, J.S.C.<br />
Index No.:<br />
122034-1998<br />
-against-<br />
Plaintiffs,<br />
NO OPPOSITION SUMMARY JUDGMENT<br />
MOTION AND ORDER<br />
A.O. SMITH WATER PRODUCTS, et al. including,<br />
FOSTER WHEELER CORPORATION,<br />
Defendants.<br />
WHEREFORE, defendant FOSTER WHEELER, L.L.C. (sued herein as “FOSTER WHEELER<br />
CORPORATION”) hereby request summary judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil<br />
Practice Law and Rules Section 3212, dismissing plaintiffs’ complaint against defendant FOSTER<br />
WHEELER, L.L.C. with prejudice, and there being no opposition thereto,<br />
ORDERED, that upon notice to all ca-defendants, all claims and cross claims against defendant<br />
FOSTER WHEELER, L.L.C. be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and without costs.<br />
Weitz & Luxenberg, P.C. 5<br />
Dennis E. Vega, Esq.<br />
Sedgwick, Detert, Moran & Arnold, LLP<br />
Attorney for Plain tffs<br />
700 Broadway<br />
New York, New York 10003 /<br />
Attorneys for Foster Wheeler, L. L.C.<br />
Three Gateway Center, 12th Floor<br />
Newark, NJ 07102<br />
rn nnnrnrn<br />
1 unucncu,<br />
Hok&rry Klein Heitler<br />
NEW YORK<br />
WUWY CLERKS OFFICE‘<br />
NJ1341759vl
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK<br />
COUNTY OF NEW YORK<br />
IN RE NEW YORK CITY ASBESTOS LITIGATION NYCAL<br />
Hon. Sherry Klein Heitler<br />
VIVIAN LAWRENCE, as Executrix for the Estate of GEORGE<br />
LAWRENCE, Deceased,<br />
"against-<br />
Plaintiff(s),<br />
X<br />
X<br />
Index No. 1<strong>26</strong>776-2002<br />
NO OPPOSITION<br />
SUMMARY JUDGMENT MOTION AND<br />
ORDER<br />
AMERICAN STANDARD, INC. et al., including<br />
FOSTER WHEELER, LLC,<br />
Defendants.<br />
X<br />
WHEREFORE, defendant FOSTER WHEELER, LLC hereby requests summary judgment in the<br />
above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212, dismissing plaintiffs'<br />
complaint against defendant FOSTER WHEELER, LLC with prejudice, and there being no opposition<br />
thereto,<br />
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against defendant<br />
FOSTER WHEELER, LLC be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and without costs.<br />
Sedgwick, Detert, Moran & Arnold LLP<br />
Attorneys Three Gateway for Foster Center, Wheeler,<br />
12'h F $lLED<br />
or<br />
15 20<strong>11</strong><br />
APR 2 6 20<strong>11</strong><br />
NEW YORK<br />
COUNTY CLERK'S OFFICE
NYCAL<br />
I.A.S. Part 30<br />
Hon. Sherry Klein Heitler, J.S.C.<br />
COSMA LERUZIC, as Executrix for the Estate of PETER F.<br />
LERUZIC and COSMA LERUZIC, Individually,<br />
Index No.:<br />
121982-1999<br />
-against-<br />
Plaintiffs,<br />
NO OPPOSITION SUMMARY JUDGMENT<br />
MOTION AND ORDER<br />
A.O. SMITH WATER PRODUCTS, et al. including,<br />
FOSTER WHEELER CORPORATION,<br />
Defendants.<br />
WHEREFORE, defendant FOSTER WHEELER, L.L.C. (sued herein as “FOSTER WHEELER<br />
CORPORATION”) hereby request summary judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil<br />
Practice Law and Rules Section 3212, dismissing plaintiffs’ complaint against defendant FOSTER<br />
WHEELER, L.L.C. with prejudice, and there being no opposition thereto,<br />
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against defendant<br />
FOSTER WHEELER, L.L.C. be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and without costs.<br />
Dated:<br />
,New York, New York<br />
Frank Ortiz, Esq.<br />
Weitz & Luxenberg, P.C.<br />
Attorney for Plaint~fs<br />
700 Broadway<br />
New York, New York 1000<br />
3<br />
Sedgwick,<br />
Dennis E. Vega, Detert, Esq. Moran & Arnold, LLP<br />
Attorneys for Foster Wheeler, L. L.C.<br />
Three Gateway Center, 12fh Floor<br />
Newark, NJ 07102<br />
SO ORPERED,<br />
Hon. SheK Klei’n Heitler<br />
NEW YORK<br />
COUNTY CLERKIS OFFICE‘<br />
NJD4I 757vl
SLJPREME COURT OF 'PFIE STATE OF NEW YOK<br />
COUNTY OF NEW YORK<br />
IN E: NEW YORK COUNTY j NYCAL<br />
ASBESTOS L J TlGATl ON<br />
; 1.A.S. Part 30<br />
j (Heitler, J.)<br />
1HIS DOCUMENT R.EFERS TO:<br />
THEODORE FRASIER, EXECUTOR FOR 'THE<br />
ESTATE OF CLYDE FRASIER,<br />
0<br />
-against-<br />
A. C. & S., INC., et al,,<br />
PI ai n ti ffs,<br />
j Index No.: 124331/00 00757/03<br />
i<br />
NO OPPOSITION<br />
i SUMMARY JUDGMENT<br />
[ MOTION AND ORDER<br />
Defendants.<br />
j<br />
WHEREFORE, defendant, Treadwell Corporation, hereby requests summary judgment in<br />
the above entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules 5 3212, dismissing plaintiffs'<br />
complaint against defendant, Treadwell Corporation, with prejudice in this action, and there<br />
being no opposition thereto,<br />
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against<br />
defendant, Treadwell Corporation, be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and<br />
without costs.<br />
80 Broad Street-Suite 2300<br />
New York, New York 100<strong>04</strong><br />
(212) 509-3456<br />
WEIT2 & LUXENBERG, P.C.<br />
700 Broadway<br />
N0<strong>04</strong><strong>04</strong>78-1
SUPREME COUR’r OF ‘I’HE STATE OF NEW YORK<br />
-.-_-<br />
ASBESTOS LlTIGATl ON<br />
‘1”FIiS DOClJMENT REFERS TO:<br />
TI 1EODORE FMSIER, EXECUTOR FOR THE<br />
ESTATE OF CLYDE FKASIER,<br />
-against-<br />
Plaintiffs,<br />
; I.A.S. Part 30<br />
; (FJeitler, J.)<br />
0<br />
i Index No.: 124331/00, 100757/03<br />
[ NO OPPOSITION<br />
; SUMMARY JUDGMENT<br />
/ MOTION AND OKDER<br />
-<br />
A. C. & S., INC., et ul.,<br />
Defendants.<br />
i<br />
WHEFEFORE, defendant, Tishman Liquidating Corp., hereby requests summary<br />
judgment in the above entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules 8 3212, dismissing<br />
plaintiffs’ complaint against defendant, Tishman Liquidating Corp., with prejudice in this action,<br />
and there being no opposition thereto,<br />
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against<br />
defendant, Tishman Liquidating Corp., be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and<br />
without costs.<br />
MCG~VNEY & KLUGER, P.C.<br />
80 Broad Street-Suite 2300<br />
New York, New York 100<strong>04</strong><br />
(212) 509-3456 0<br />
SO ORDERED,<br />
WEITZ & LUXENBERG, P.C.<br />
700 Broadway<br />
New York New York 10003 APR 2 6 20<strong>11</strong><br />
NEW YORK<br />
COUNTY CLERKS OFFtCf<br />
2383-22283<br />
N0<strong>04</strong><strong>04</strong>78-1
CO1JNTY OF NEW YOKK _-- -"-- IN RE: NEW YOPX COUNTY<br />
\ NYCAL<br />
ASBESTOS LI'I'IGRTION I I.A.S. Part 30<br />
! (Heitler, J.)<br />
__I<br />
THIS DOCUMENT REFERS TO:<br />
TERRY M. KESSLER AND MARSHA<br />
KES S LEK,<br />
-against -<br />
A. C. & S., INC., et d.,<br />
Plaintiffs,<br />
i<br />
i<br />
j<br />
NO OPPOSITION<br />
SUMMARY JUDGMENT<br />
MOTION AND ORDER<br />
Defendants. !<br />
WHEREFORE, defendant, Safeguard Industrial Equipment ,Co., hereby requests<br />
summary judgment in the above entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules $ 3212,'<br />
dismissing plaintiffs' complaint against defendant, Safeguard Industrial Equipment Co., with<br />
prejudice in this action, and there being no opposition thereto,<br />
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against<br />
defendant, Safeguard Industrial Equipment Co., be and the same are hereby dismissed with<br />
prejudice and without costs.<br />
Ir""<br />
4" '.Vrbr*..*uL<br />
Safeguard Industrial Equipment Co.<br />
MCGXWY & KLUGER, P.C.<br />
80 Broad Street-Suite 2300<br />
New York, New Yoxk 100<strong>04</strong><br />
(212) 509-3456<br />
SO ORDERED,<br />
Hon. Sherry Klein Heitler<br />
Frq bj. O(t;? Eq.<br />
Attorney for Plaintiffs<br />
Carl Kroger and Carol Ann Kroger<br />
WEITZ & LUXENBERG, P.<br />
700 Broadway I<br />
New York, New York 100<br />
APR 2 6 20<strong>11</strong><br />
324-564dEP j'c'PIK<br />
COUNTY CLEHW QFFICE'<br />
I<br />
N0<strong>04</strong><strong>04</strong>78-1
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK<br />
COUNTY OF NEW YORK<br />
IN RE: NEW YOXENTY<br />
i NYCAL<br />
ASBESTOS LITIGATlON j I.A.S. Part 30<br />
j (Heitler. J.1<br />
I ,<br />
THIS DOCUMENT mFEKS TO:<br />
j Index No..<br />
TERRY M. KESSLER AND MARSHA<br />
KESSLER,<br />
-against-<br />
Plaintiffs, j NO OPPOSITION<br />
i SUMMARY JUDGMENT<br />
! MOTION AND ORDER<br />
A. C. & S., INC., etal.,<br />
Defendants.<br />
i<br />
WHEREFORE, defendant, Tishman Liquidating Corp., hereby requests summary<br />
judgment in the above entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules 6 3212, dismissing<br />
plaintiffs' complaint against defendant, Tishman Liquidating Corp., with prejudice in this action,<br />
and there being no opposition thereto,<br />
ORDERED? that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against<br />
defendant, Tishman Liquidating Corp., be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and<br />
without costs.<br />
Dated: New York New York<br />
MCGIVNEY & UUGER, P.C.<br />
80 Broad Street-Suite 2300<br />
New York, New York 100 New York 10003<br />
(212) 509-3456<br />
2 6 20<strong>11</strong><br />
SO ORDERED,<br />
NEW YORK<br />
2 @kERK'S UFFlCE<br />
N0<strong>04</strong><strong>04</strong>78-1
S~JPREME coum OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK<br />
COUNTY OF NEW YOIIK -<br />
IN RE: NEW YOKK COUNTY<br />
! NYCAL<br />
ASBESTOS LITIGATION j I.A.S. Part 30<br />
! (Heitler, J.><br />
THIS DOCUMENT REFERS TO:<br />
TERRY M. KESSLER AND MARSHA<br />
KESSLER,<br />
-<br />
-against -<br />
A. C. & S., INC., et al.,<br />
Plaintiffs,<br />
Defendants.<br />
! NO OPPOSITION<br />
i SUMMARY JUDGMENT<br />
i MOTION AND ORlDER<br />
i<br />
WHEREFORE, defendant, Treadwell Corporation, hereby requests summary judgment in<br />
the above entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules 5 3212, dismissing plaintiffs'<br />
complaint against defendant, Treadwell Corporation, with prejudice in this action, and there<br />
being no opposition thereto,<br />
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against<br />
defendant, Treadwell Corporation, be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and<br />
without costs.<br />
Dated: New York, New York<br />
Carol M. Ternpesta, Esq.<br />
Attorney for Defendant<br />
Treadwell Corporation<br />
MCGIVNEY & KLUGER, P.C.<br />
80 Broad Street-Suite 2300<br />
New York, New York 100<strong>04</strong><br />
(212) 509-3456<br />
SO ORDERED,<br />
WElTZ & LUXENBERG, P.C.<br />
700 Broadway<br />
New York, New York 10003<br />
123@biV<br />
.;ORE<<br />
bEd qKs OFF\CE<br />
Ty C W
*A<br />
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK<br />
COUNTY OF NEW YORK<br />
IN RE:<br />
NEW YORK CITY<br />
ASBESTOS LITIGATION<br />
I.A.S. Part 30<br />
(Heitler, J.)<br />
This Document Relates to:<br />
SAM DONOFRIO<br />
against<br />
INDEX NO.: 03-107991<br />
NO OPPOSITION<br />
SUMMARY JUDGMENT<br />
MOTION AND ORDER<br />
A. 0. SMTH WATER PRODUCTS CO.. ET AL<br />
WHEREFORE, defendant, Kohler Co., hereby requests summary judgment in the<br />
above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212, dismissing plaintiffs'<br />
complaint against defendant, Kohler Co., with prejudice, and there being no opposition thereto,<br />
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against<br />
defendant, Kohler Co., be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and without costs.<br />
DATED:<br />
New York, New York<br />
3 \\-I \\\<br />
A<br />
HOAGLAND, LONGO, MORAN<br />
DUNST & DOUKAS, LLP<br />
Attorneys for Defendant,<br />
Kohler Co.<br />
40 Paterson Street - PO Box 480<br />
New Brunswick, New Jersey 08903<br />
WEITZ & LUXENBE-<br />
Attorneys for Plaintiff@),<br />
Sam Donofrio<br />
700 Broadway<br />
New York, NY 10003<br />
HOAGLAND, LONGO<br />
MORAN. DUNST 8<br />
DQUKAS, LLP<br />
ATTORNEYS AT LAW<br />
NORTH JERSEY<br />
40 PATERSON ST<br />
PO BOX 480<br />
NEW BRUNWCK. NJ<br />
SOUTH JERSEY<br />
701 VVILTSEY'S MILL RD<br />
SUITE 202<br />
HAMMONTON, NJ<br />
SO ORDERED:<br />
SHERRY KfEIN HWLER<br />
Ft<br />
APR 2 6 2821
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK<br />
COUNTY OF NEW YORK<br />
IN RE NEW YORK ClTv ASBESTOS LITIGATION NYCAL<br />
Hon, Sherry Klein Heltler<br />
X<br />
ROBERT DOWNEY and RITA DOWNEY, Index No. 109278-2003<br />
-against-<br />
Plaintiff(s),<br />
NO OPPOSITION<br />
SUMMARY JUDGMENT MOTION AND<br />
ORDER<br />
A.O. SMITH WATER PRODUCTS et al., including<br />
FOSTER WHEELER, LLC,<br />
Defendants.<br />
WHEREFORE, defendant FOSTER WHEELER, LLC hereby requests summary judgment in the<br />
above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212, dismissing plaintiffs'<br />
complaint against defendant FOSTER WHEELER, LLC with prejudice, and there being no opposition<br />
thereto,<br />
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against defendant<br />
FOSTER WHEELER, LLC be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and without costs.<br />
Dated:<br />
New York,Jew York<br />
Joseph W.Jfelluck, Esq.<br />
Sedgwick, Detert, Moran & Arnold, LLP<br />
Attorneys for Foster Wheeler, L<br />
546 Fifth Avenue, 4'h Floor<br />
Three Gateway Center, 12fh Flo<br />
New York, NY 10036 , NJ 07102<br />
APR 2 6 20<strong>11</strong><br />
SO ORDERED,<br />
Hon. Sherry Klein Heitler, J.S.C.<br />
NEW YORK<br />
r,OUNn CLERK'S OFFICE'
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW Y ON<br />
COUNTY OF NEW YORK<br />
NYCAL<br />
-against-<br />
Plaintifqs),<br />
Index No. 109278/03<br />
NO OPPOSITION<br />
SUMMARY JUDGMENT<br />
MOTION AND ORDER<br />
Hon. Shew Klein Heitler,<br />
LAS Part 30 ..<br />
WHEREFORE, defendant The Goodyear Tire & Rubber Company hereby<br />
requests summary judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to CPLR 3212,<br />
dismissing plaintiff's complaint against The Goodyear Tire & Rubber Company with<br />
prejudice, and there being no apposition thereto, it is hereby:<br />
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims<br />
*<br />
against The Goodyear Tire & Rubber Company be and the same are hereby dismissed<br />
with prejudice and without costs,<br />
Dated: New Yo , ET w York<br />
BELLUCR & FOX, LLP<br />
LYNCH DASKAL EMERY LLP<br />
Attorneys for Plaintiff<br />
546 5th Avenue, 4th Floor<br />
<strong>26</strong>4 West 40* Street<br />
New York, New York 10036<br />
New York, New York 10018<br />
(212) 681-1575 (212) 302-2400<br />
Dated: New York, New York<br />
SO ORDERED:
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK<br />
ALL COUNTIES WITHIN NEW YORK CITY<br />
-_________---------I__lf______________<br />
X<br />
IN RE: NEW YORK COUNTY<br />
ASBESTOS LITIGATION<br />
......................................<br />
This Document Relates to:<br />
EDWARD L. JEMIOLO<br />
Plaintiff<br />
X<br />
NYCAL<br />
I.A.S. Part 30<br />
(Judge Heitler)<br />
Index No.: <strong>11</strong>1829/03<br />
NO-OPPOSITION<br />
SUMMARY JUDGMENT<br />
MOTION AND ORDER<br />
- against -<br />
A.C. &<br />
S., INC., et al.,<br />
WHEREFORE,<br />
defendant BURNHAM LLC,<br />
hereby requests summar<br />
judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice La<br />
and Rules Section 53212, dismissing plaintiffs' Complaint agains<br />
defendant BURNHAM LLC,<br />
with prejudice, and there being n<br />
opposition thereto,<br />
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims an<br />
cross claims against defendant BURNHAM LLC,<br />
be dismissed wit<br />
prejudice and without costs.<br />
Weitz & Luxenberg, Cullen and Dykman LLP<br />
Attorneys for Plaintiff Attorneys for Defendant<br />
Edward L. Jemiolo<br />
Burnham LLC<br />
700 Broadway, 6th Floor 177 Montague Street<br />
New York, New York 10003 Brooklyn, New York <strong>11</strong>201<br />
212-558-5500<br />
(718) 855-9000<br />
Our File No.: <strong>11</strong>08<br />
D
I<br />
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK<br />
COUNTY OF NEW YORK<br />
IN RE: NEW YORK CITY<br />
ASBESTOS LITIGATION<br />
I.A.S. Part 30<br />
(Heitler, J.)<br />
This Document Relates to:<br />
ELLA RUTH MONTONEY and DONNA JEAN<br />
WEESE as Executrix of the Estate of OSCAR<br />
FOANE MONTONEY,<br />
against<br />
A.O. SMITH WATER PRODUCTS. et al..<br />
INDEX NO.: 03-1 16300<br />
NO OPPOSITION<br />
SUMMARY JUDGMENT<br />
MOTION AND ORDER<br />
WHEREFORE, defendant, York lnternatlonal Corporation, hereby requests summary<br />
I<br />
i<br />
iudgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212,<br />
jismissing plaintiffs' complaint against defendant, York International Corporation, with prejudice,<br />
md there being no opposition thereto,<br />
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against<br />
jefendant, York International Corporation, be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice<br />
and without costs.<br />
DATED;<br />
New Brunswick, NJ<br />
1<br />
iOAGLAND, LONGO, M<br />
IUNST & DOUKAS, LLP<br />
4ttorneys for Defendant,<br />
(ork International Corporation<br />
IO Paterson Street - PO Box 480<br />
dew Brunswick, New Jersey 08903<br />
Ella Ruth Montoney and Donna Jean Weese<br />
as Executrix of the Estate of Oscar Foane<br />
io ORDERED:<br />
Honorable Sherry Klein Heitler<br />
I <strong>11</strong><strong>11</strong><strong>11</strong><strong>11</strong><strong>11</strong><strong>11</strong> 1 l <strong>11</strong><strong>11</strong>1l<strong>11</strong> l II l<br />
BU-TURF-2
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK<br />
COUNTY OF NEW YORK<br />
IN RE NEW YORK CITY ASBESTOS LITIGATION NYCAL<br />
Hon. Sherry Klein Heitler<br />
FRED ASSOULIN, as Proposed Executor for the Estate of Index No. 103905-20<strong>04</strong><br />
SHERRY ASSOULIN and FRED ASSOULIN, Individually,<br />
NO OPPOSITION<br />
Plaintiff (s)<br />
SUMMARY JUDGMENT MOTION AND<br />
V. ORDER<br />
X<br />
X<br />
A.O. SMITH WATER PRODUCTS COMPANY et al. including<br />
FOSTER WHEELER, L.L.C.,<br />
X<br />
WHEREFORE, defendant FOSTER WHEELER, L.L.C. hereby requests summary judgment in the<br />
above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212, dismissing plaintiffs'<br />
complaint against defendant FOSTER WHEELER, L.L.C. with prejudice, and there being no opposition<br />
thereto,<br />
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against defendant<br />
FOSTER WHEELER, L.L.C. be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and without costs.<br />
1Sedgwick, Dennis E. Vega, Detert, Esq. Moran & Arnold, LLP<br />
Weitr & Luxenberg, P.C.<br />
Attorneys for Plointvfs<br />
Attorneys for foster Wheeler, 1. L.C.<br />
700 Broadway<br />
Three Gateway Center, 12fh Floor<br />
New York, NY 10003<br />
Newark, NJ 07102<br />
(212) 558-5500 (973) 242-0002<br />
SO ORDERED,<br />
"- -<br />
APR 2 6 20<strong>11</strong><br />
NEW YORK<br />
COUNTY CLERKS OFFICE'
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK<br />
COUNTY OF NEW YORK<br />
* NYCAL<br />
LAURA FRACCALVIERI, as Administratrix for the : I.A.S, Part 3o<br />
Estate of FRANK FRACCALVIERI,<br />
: (Hon. Sherry Klein Heitler)<br />
Plaintiff( s) ,<br />
: Index No(s).: 105233-<strong>04</strong><br />
-against-<br />
A.O. SMITH WATER PRODUCTS CO., et al.,<br />
Defendants,<br />
NO-OPPOSITION SUMMARY<br />
: JUDGMENT MOTION AND<br />
: ORDER<br />
WHEREFORE, defendant CRANE CO. hereby requests summary judgment in the<br />
above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212, dismissing<br />
plaintiffs complaint against defendant CRANE CO. with prejudice, and there being no<br />
opposition thereto,<br />
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against<br />
defendant CRANE CO. be, and the same are hereby, dismissed with prejudice and without costs.<br />
Dated: 3 \30\ \\<br />
New Xork, New York<br />
Attorneys for Plaintiff(s)<br />
700 Broadway<br />
New York, NY 10003<br />
(212) 558-5500<br />
SO ORDERED,<br />
CRANE CO.<br />
599 Lexington venue APK 2 6 2"'<br />
New York, NY 10022<br />
(212) 536-3900 WRK<br />
c:OUN+r( CLERKS OFF'*
-____________-------______________t__l<br />
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK<br />
ALL COUNTIES WITHIN NEW YORK CITY<br />
X NYCAL<br />
IN RE: NEW YORK COUNTY I.A.S. Part 30<br />
ASBESTOS LITIGATION<br />
(Judge Heitler)<br />
______-------f------___I______________<br />
X<br />
This Document Relates to: Index No.: <strong>11</strong>1253/<strong>04</strong><br />
MARTIN ZUCKERMAN<br />
NO-OPPOSITION<br />
SUMMARY JUDGMENT<br />
Plaintiff,<br />
MOTION AND ORDER<br />
- against -<br />
A.O.<br />
SMITH WATER PRODUCTS CO., et al.,<br />
Defendants.<br />
---------------------------*---*------<br />
X<br />
WHEREFOREl defendant BURNHAM LLC, hereby requests summary<br />
judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to C ivil Practice LaLd<br />
and Rules Section §3212,<br />
dismissing plaintiffs' Complaint against<br />
defendant BURNHAM LLC, with prejudice, and there being no<br />
opposition thereto,<br />
ORDERED, that upon notice to a<strong>11</strong> co-defendants, all claims and<br />
cross claims against defendant BURNHAM LLC, be dismissed with<br />
prejudice and without costs.<br />
SO ORDERED: f3.<br />
I
No.:<br />
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK<br />
ALL COUNTIES WITHIN NEW YORK CITY<br />
..................................... -X<br />
IN RE: NEW YORK COUNTY<br />
ASBESTOS LITIGATION<br />
..................................... -X<br />
This Document Relates to:<br />
Valerie Zuckerman, as Executrix for the<br />
Estate of Martin Zuckerman,<br />
- against -<br />
Plaintiff,<br />
A.O. Smith Water Products Co., et al.,<br />
NYCAL<br />
I.A.S. Part 30<br />
(Judge Heitler)<br />
Index No.: <strong>11</strong>1253/<strong>04</strong><br />
NO OPPOSITION<br />
S-Y JUDGMENT<br />
MOTION AND ORDER<br />
WHEREFORE, defendant Mario &<br />
DiBono Plastering Co. Inc.,<br />
hereby requests summary judgment in the above-entitled case,<br />
pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section §3212,<br />
dismissing plaintiffs' Complaint against defendant Mario E<br />
DiBono Plastering Co. Inc., with prejudice, and there being nc<br />
opposition thereto,<br />
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claim:<br />
and cross claims against defendant Mario & DiBono Plastering Co.<br />
Inc., be dismissed with prejudice and without costs.<br />
//.
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK<br />
COUNTY OF NEW YOFK<br />
LILLIAN P, CARPENTER, as Executrix for the<br />
Estate of GERALD CLAYTON CARPENTER,<br />
Plaintiff(s),<br />
-against-<br />
A.O. SMITH WATER PRODUCTS CO., et al.,<br />
Defendants.<br />
: NYCAL<br />
: I.A.S. Part 30<br />
: (Hon. Sherry Klein Heitler)<br />
: Index No.: <strong>11</strong>4255-<strong>04</strong><br />
: NO-OPPOSITION SUMMARY<br />
: JUDGMENT MOTION AND<br />
: ORDER<br />
WHEREFORE, defendant CRANE CO. hereby requests summary judgment in the<br />
above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 32 12, dismissing<br />
plaintiffs' complaint against defendant CRANE CO. with prejudice, and there being no<br />
opposition thereto,<br />
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against<br />
defendant CRANE CO. be, and the same are hereby, dismissed with prejudice and without casts.<br />
Dated: 3 \ >-/ \\<br />
New York, New York<br />
Kirst Alford Kneis, Esq.<br />
K& GATESLLP<br />
Attorneys for Plaintiff(s)<br />
At rneys for Defendant<br />
700 Broadway CRANE CO.<br />
New York, NY 10003<br />
599 Lexington Avenue<br />
(212) 558-5500<br />
New York, NY 10022<br />
(212) 536-3900<br />
SO ORDERED,<br />
APR 1520<strong>11</strong><br />
?"-Ob'<br />
2 6 20<strong>11</strong><br />
r ;-'jb YOHK<br />
rl' CLERKS OFF,^^
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK<br />
ALL COUNTIES WITHIN NEW YORK CITY<br />
X NY CAL<br />
____--l-l--l___-----------------------<br />
IN RE: NEW YORK COUNTY I.A.S. Part 30<br />
ASBESTOS LITIGATION<br />
-_l_____----------lf_______________f_l<br />
X<br />
(Judge Heitler)<br />
This Document Relates to:<br />
CARL LUNDERMAN<br />
Index No.: <strong>11</strong>5493/<strong>04</strong><br />
NO-OPPOSITION<br />
SUMMARY JUDCMENT<br />
Plaintiff,<br />
MOTION AND ORDER<br />
- against -<br />
A.C. &<br />
S., INC., et al.,<br />
Defendants.<br />
WHEREFORE, defendant BURNHAM LLC, hereby requests summar:{<br />
X<br />
I<br />
I<br />
I<br />
judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice La\$<br />
and Rules Section 53212, dismissing plaintiffs’ Complaint agains-:<br />
defendant BURNHAM LLC, with prejudice, and there being no<br />
opposition thereto,<br />
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and<br />
cross claims against defendant BURNHAM LLC, be dismissed with<br />
prejudice and without costs.<br />
Dated: Br<br />
Weitz & Luxenberg,<br />
Attorneys for Plaintiff Attorneys for Defendant<br />
Carl Lunderman<br />
Burn ham LLC<br />
700 Broadway, Gth Floor 177 Montague Street<br />
SO ORDERED:<br />
Hon. Sherry K. Heitler
NYCAL<br />
I.A.S. Part 30<br />
Hon. Sherry Klein Heitler, J.S.C.<br />
GLENN WllTlNG AND CONSTANCE WITTING,<br />
Index No.: <strong>11</strong>5962-20<strong>04</strong><br />
-against-<br />
A.W. CHESTERTON et al. including,<br />
GENERAL ELECTRIC COMPANY,<br />
Plaintiffs,<br />
NO OPPOSITION SUMMARY JUDGMENT<br />
MOTION AND ORDER<br />
Defendants.<br />
WHEREFORE, defendant GENERAL ELECTRIC COMPANY hereby request summary judgment in<br />
the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212, dismissing plaintiffs'<br />
complaint against defendant GENERAL ELECTRIC COMPANY with prejudice, and there being no<br />
opposition thereto,<br />
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against defendant<br />
GENERAL ELECTRIC COMPANY be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and without costs.<br />
Dated:<br />
Belluck & Fox, LLP<br />
Attorney for Plaint#%<br />
546 Fifth Avenue, qfh Floor<br />
Sedgwick, Detert, Moran & Arnold, LLP<br />
Attorneys for General Electric Company<br />
Three Gateway Center, 12'h Floor<br />
NEVd YORK<br />
NJI43274Svl<br />
I
SUPMME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK<br />
COUNTY OF NEW YORK<br />
IN RE:<br />
NEW YORK CITY<br />
ASBESTOS LITIGATION<br />
JOHN COUGHLIN<br />
NYCAL<br />
I.A.S. Part 30<br />
(Heitler, S,)<br />
Index No. 9<br />
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK<br />
COUNTY OF NEW YORK<br />
IN RE NEW YORK CITY ASBESTOS LITIGATION NYCAL<br />
Hon. Sherry Klein Heitler<br />
ADA IRIS OVALLE,<br />
X<br />
X<br />
Index No. <strong>11</strong>2085-2005<br />
-against-<br />
Pia int iff (s),<br />
NO OPPOSITION<br />
SUMMARY JUDGMENT MOTION AND<br />
ORDER<br />
A.O. SMITH WATER PRODUCTS, INC. et al., including<br />
FOSTER WHEELER, LLC,<br />
Defendants.<br />
WHEREFORE, defendant FOSTER WHEELER, LLC hereby requests summary judgment in the<br />
above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212, dismissing plaintiffs'<br />
complaint against defendant FOSTER WHEELER, LLC with prejudice, and there being no opposition<br />
thereto,<br />
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against defendant<br />
FOSTER WHEELER, LLC be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and without costs.<br />
Sedgwick, Detert, Moran & Arnold, LLP<br />
Attorneys for Foster Wheeler, IIC<br />
546 Fifth Avenue, qfh Floor<br />
Three Gateway Center, 12'h Flo r<br />
New York, NY 10036 A w a r k .<br />
2!5ziic<br />
NJ07102<br />
SO ORDERED,<br />
0 1 E D
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK<br />
COUNn OF NEW YORK<br />
IN RE NEW YORK CITY ASBESTOS LITIGATION NYCAL<br />
I.A.S. Part 30<br />
RAFFAELE LACALAMITA and COLOMBA LACALAMITA,<br />
X<br />
X<br />
Index No. <strong>11</strong>4107-2005<br />
-against-<br />
Plaint iff,<br />
A.O. SMITH WATER PRODUCTS, et al., including<br />
GENERAL ELECTRIC COMPANY,<br />
NO OPPOSITION<br />
SUMMARY JUDGMENT MOTION AND<br />
ORDER<br />
Defendants.<br />
WHEREFORE, defendant General Electric Company hereby request summary judgment in the<br />
above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212, dismissing plaintiffs'<br />
complaint against defendant General Electric Company with prejudice, and there being no opposition<br />
thereto,<br />
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against defendant<br />
General Electric Company be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and without costs.<br />
Dated:<br />
New York, New York<br />
Stephen Novakid;,<br />
-<br />
Esq.<br />
Sedgwick, Detert, Moran 81 Arnold, LLP<br />
Attorneys for General Electric Co<br />
Three Gateway Center, 12fh Floor
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK<br />
COUNTY OF NEW YORK<br />
IN RE NEW YORK CIW ASBESTOS LITIGATION NYCAL<br />
X<br />
GINGER M. WOOD, AS PERSONAL REPRESENTATIVE OF THE<br />
ESTATE OF HENRY L. WOOD,<br />
X<br />
Index No. 101027-2006<br />
-against-<br />
Plaintlffs,<br />
NO OPPOSITION<br />
SUMMARY JUDGMENT MOTION AND<br />
ORDER<br />
A.O. SMITH WATER PRODUCTS, et al., including<br />
GENERAL ELECTRIC COMPANY,<br />
Defendants.<br />
X<br />
WHEREFORE, defendant General Electric Company hereby request summary judgment in the<br />
above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212, dismissing plaintiffs’<br />
complaint against defendant General Electric Company with prejudice, and there being no opposition<br />
thereto,<br />
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against defendant<br />
General Electric Company be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and without costs.<br />
Dated:<br />
New York, New York<br />
-<br />
Attorneys for Plaintiffs<br />
546 Fifth Avenue, qfh Floor<br />
New York, NY 10036 Newark,<br />
Stephen Novakidis, Esq.<br />
Sedgwick, Detert, Moran & Arnold, LF<br />
Attorneys for General Electric Company<br />
Three Gateway Center, 12‘h Floor<br />
I L E D<br />
NJ 07102<br />
APR 2 6 20<strong>11</strong><br />
APR 15 20<strong>11</strong><br />
bJFW YORK<br />
~ U N TCLERK‘S V<br />
OFFICEI’
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW Y ON<br />
COUNTY OF NEW YORK<br />
JOHN COUGHLIN and BARBARA ANN<br />
COUGHLIN,<br />
NYCAL<br />
: I.A.S. Part 30<br />
(Hon. Sherry Klein Heitler)<br />
Plaintiff(s),<br />
: Index No.: 102347-05<br />
-against-<br />
A.O. SMITH WATER PRODUCTS CO., et al.,<br />
NO-OPPOSITION SUMMARY<br />
JUDGMENT MOTION AND<br />
: ORDER<br />
WHEREFORE, defendant CRANE CO, hereby requests summary judgment in the<br />
above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212, dismissing<br />
plaintiffs' complaint against defendant CRANE CO. with prejudice, and there being no<br />
opposition thereto,<br />
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against<br />
defendant CRANE CO. be, and the same are hereby, dismissed with prejudice and without costs,<br />
Dated: 3 \30 \ \\<br />
Frank Ortiz, Esq.<br />
Attorneys for Plaintiff(s)<br />
700 Broadway<br />
New York, NY 10003<br />
(2 12) 558-5500 New York, NY 10022<br />
(212) 536-3900 APR 2 6 *01'<br />
SO ORDERED,<br />
prcw YORK<br />
C,OUN ry CLERKS oFF'CE
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK<br />
COUNTY OF NEW YORK<br />
IN E: NEW YORK COUNTY<br />
! NYCAL<br />
ASBESTOS LITIGATION<br />
j 1.A.S. Part 30<br />
j (Heitler, J.)<br />
1<br />
THIS DOCUMENT REFERS TO:<br />
j IndexNo.. ~ 7 0 8 1 ’ 0,<br />
1<br />
DONNA M. MEDER, PERSONAL<br />
REPRESENTATIVE FOR THE ESTATE OF<br />
DONALD E. SIERING,<br />
i NO OPPOSITION<br />
Plaintiffs, i SUMMARY JUDGMENT<br />
i MOTION AND ORDER .<br />
-against-<br />
A. C. & S., NC., et al.,<br />
Defendants.<br />
i<br />
WHEREFOE, defendant, Treadwell Corporation, hereby requests summary judgment in<br />
the above entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules 5 3212, dismissing plaintiffs’<br />
complaint against defendant, Treadwell Corporation, with prejudice in this action, and there<br />
being no opposition thereto,<br />
ORDEED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against<br />
defendant, Treadwell Corporation, be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and<br />
without costs.<br />
Dated: New York, New York<br />
Attorney for Defendant<br />
Treadwe<strong>11</strong> Corporation<br />
MCGIVNEY & KLUGER, P.C.<br />
80 Broad Street-Suite 2300<br />
New York, New York 100<strong>04</strong><br />
(212) 509-3456<br />
SO ORDERED,<br />
700 Broadway<br />
New York, New York 10003<br />
123GQW<br />
APR 2 6 20<strong>11</strong><br />
f4EN YORK<br />
1-y CLERK‘S OFFICE
SUI'KEME COIJR'f OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK<br />
COUNTY OF NEW YORK --<br />
IN RE: NEW YORK COUNTY j NYCAJ,<br />
ASBESTOS LITIGATION<br />
j 1.A.S. Part 3<br />
--_A<br />
I (Heitler, J.)<br />
?'HIS DOCUMENT REFERS TO:<br />
; Index No.: <strong>11</strong><br />
ANN LATTANZIO, INDIVIDUALLY AND AS<br />
PERSONAL REPRESENTATIVE FOR THE<br />
ESTATE OF GIOVAWI LATTANZIO,<br />
i NO OPPOSITION<br />
Plaintiffs, \ SUMMARY JUDGMENT<br />
! MOTION AND ORDER<br />
-against-<br />
__-___--..--.-<br />
---<br />
A. C. & S., WC., et al.,<br />
($%%32<strong>26</strong>9'0<br />
Defendants.<br />
J<br />
WHEREFORE, defendaqt, Oakfabco, Inc., hereby requests summary judgment in the<br />
above entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules 3 3212, dismissing plaintiffs'<br />
complaint against defendant, Oakfabco, Inc., wfth prejudice in this action, and there being no<br />
opposition thereto,<br />
ORDER.ED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against<br />
defendant, Oakfabco, Inc., be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and without<br />
costs.<br />
Dated: New York, New York<br />
201 1<br />
Robert Darish, Esq.<br />
Attorney for Defendant<br />
Oakfabco, Inc.<br />
Estate of Giovanni Lattanz<br />
MCGIVNEY & KLUGER, P.C.<br />
WEITZ & LUXENBERG, P.C.<br />
80 Broad Street-Suite 2300<br />
700 Broadway<br />
New York, New York 100 New York, New York 10003 APR 2<br />
6 20<strong>11</strong><br />
(2 12) 509-3456<br />
SO ORDERED,
SUPREME COURT OF ‘I’I-jE STATE OF NEW YOKK<br />
.- COUNTY<br />
-. OF NEW YORK -<br />
IN RE: NEW YON couN‘rY<br />
NYCAL<br />
ASBESTOS LITIGATION<br />
J.A.S. Part 30<br />
(Heitler, 3.)<br />
1’HIS DOCUMENT REFERS TO:<br />
ANN LATTANZIO, INDIVIDUALLY AND AS<br />
PERSONAL REPRESENTATIVE FOR THE<br />
ESTATE OF GIOVANNI LATTANZIO,<br />
-against-<br />
Plaintiffs,<br />
NO OPPOSITION<br />
SUMMARY JUDGMENT<br />
MOTION AND ORDER<br />
A. C. & S., INC., et al.,<br />
Defendants.<br />
I<br />
WHEREFORE, defendant, Treadwell Corporation, hereby requests summary judgment in<br />
the above entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules 5 3212, dismissing plaintiffs’<br />
complaint against defendant, Treadwell Corporation, with prejudice in this action, and there<br />
being no opposition thereto,<br />
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against<br />
defendant, Treadwell Corporation, be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and<br />
without costs.<br />
Dated: New York, New York<br />
4/l ,20<strong>11</strong><br />
MaA<br />
Carol M. Ternpesta,hEsq.<br />
Attorney for Defendant<br />
Treadwell Corporation<br />
MCGIVNEY & KLUGER, P.C.<br />
80 Broad Street-Suite 2300<br />
New York, New York 100<strong>04</strong><br />
(212) 509-3456 Ai-‘,< ;r 6<br />
SO ORDERED, p,\rt I ‘ 7; :;I ‘a\<br />
c~~%LERK’s OFFICE<br />
N0<strong>04</strong><strong>04</strong>78-1<br />
APR 15 20<strong>11</strong>
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK<br />
COUNTY OF NEW YORK<br />
IN RE NEW YORK CITY ASBESTOS LITIGATION NYCAL<br />
Hon. Sherry Klein Heitler<br />
X<br />
X<br />
PHYLLIS N. SEGAL, Individually and as Executrix of the Estate of Index No. <strong>11</strong>3056-2006<br />
ELI J. SEGAL,<br />
-against -<br />
Plaint iff s,<br />
A.O. SMITH WATER PRODUCTS, et al., including<br />
FOSTER WHEELER, LLC,<br />
NO OPPOSITION<br />
SUMMARY JUDGMENT MOTION AND<br />
ORDER<br />
Defendants.<br />
X<br />
WHEREFORE, defendant Foster Wheeler, LLC hereby request summary judgment in the aboveentitled<br />
case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212, dismissing plaintiffs' complaint<br />
against defendant Foster Wheeler, LLC with prejudice, and there being no opposition thereto,<br />
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against defendant<br />
Foster Wheeler, LLC be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and without costs.<br />
Dated:<br />
New York, New York<br />
f%&1+30.20<strong>11</strong><br />
Bellucf Fox, LLP<br />
Attor ys for Plaintvfs<br />
546 Fifth Avet we, 4th Floor<br />
New York, NY 10036<br />
Sedgwick, Detert, Moran & Arnold, LLP<br />
Attorneysfor Foster Wheeler, LLC<br />
Three Gateway Center, 12'h Floor<br />
Newark, NJ 07102<br />
SO ORDERED,<br />
APR 2 6 20<strong>11</strong>
NYCAL<br />
I.A.S. Part 30<br />
Hon. Sherry Klein Heitler, J.S.C.<br />
DANIEL E. CRANEY and CAROLINE M. CRANEY,<br />
Index No.: <strong>11</strong>4137-2006<br />
-against-<br />
Plaintiffs,<br />
NO OPPOSITION SUMMARY JUDGMENT<br />
MOTION AND ORDER<br />
A.O. SMITH WATER PRODUCTS, et al. INCLUDING GENERAL<br />
ELECTRIC COMPANY,<br />
WHEREFORE, defendant General Electric Company hereby request summary judgment in the<br />
above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212, dismissing plaintiff's<br />
complaint against defendant General Electric Company with prejudice, and there being no opposition<br />
thereto,<br />
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against defendant<br />
General Electric Company be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and without costs.<br />
Dated:<br />
New York, New York<br />
Behck 81 Fox, LLP<br />
Attorneys for Plaintiffs<br />
546 Fifth Avenue, qfh Floor<br />
New York, New York 10036<br />
SO ORDERED,<br />
Sedgwick, Detert, Moran & Arnold, LLP<br />
Attorneys for General Electric Company<br />
Three Gateway Center, 12fh Floor<br />
Newark, NJ 07102<br />
FILED ;<br />
APR 2 6 ZMI<br />
waN YORK<br />
INTY CLERKS OFF IS^
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK<br />
ALL COUNTIES WITHIN NEW YORK CITY<br />
-__l__-l-----------lf__l_____________l<br />
X NYCAL<br />
IN RE: NEW YORK COUNTY I.A.S. Part 30<br />
ASBESTOS LITIGATION<br />
(Judge Heitler)<br />
____l_--ll----______------------------<br />
X<br />
This Document Relates to: Index No.: <strong>11</strong>4151/05<br />
JOHN R. CATANZARO<br />
NO-OPPOSITION<br />
SUMMARY JUDGMENT<br />
Plaintiff,<br />
MOTION AND ORDER<br />
- against -<br />
A.O.<br />
SMITH WATER PRODUCTS CO., et al.,<br />
Defendants.<br />
X<br />
WHEREFORE, defendant BURNHAM LLC, hereby requests summary<br />
judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law<br />
and Rules Section 53212, dismissing plaintiffs' Complaint against<br />
defendant BURNHAM LLC,<br />
with prejudice, and there being no<br />
opposition thereto,<br />
ORDERED,<br />
that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and<br />
cross claims against defendant BURNHAM LLC, be dismissed with<br />
prejudice and without costs.<br />
Frank Ortiz, Esq.<br />
Weitz & Luxenberg,<br />
Cullen and Dykman LLP<br />
Attorneys for Plaintiff Attorneys for Defendant<br />
John R. Catanzaro<br />
Burnham LLC<br />
700 Broadway, 6th Floor 177 Montague Street<br />
New York, New York 10003 Brooklyn, New York <strong>11</strong>201<br />
212-558-5500 (718) 855-9000<br />
Our File No.: <strong>11</strong>08<br />
SO ORDERED:<br />
APR 2 6 20<strong>11</strong><br />
NFW ',ORK<br />
?OUN"I^U CLERK'S OFF1
-<br />
-<br />
-<br />
V<br />
TMc:CC('jpk)<br />
10<strong>11</strong> 5/09<br />
THIS DOCUMENT RELATES TO:<br />
BERNAXtD FAMMATEO<br />
WON. SHERRY KLEIN HEITLER<br />
NO OPPOSITION SUMMARY<br />
JlJJXMENT MOTION AND<br />
ORDER<br />
WHEREFORE, defendant Consolidated Edison Company of New York, Inc.<br />
hereby requests summary judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law<br />
and Rules Section 3212, dismissing plaintiffs complaint against defendant Consolidated Edison<br />
Company of New York, Inc. with prejudice, and there being no opposition thereto,<br />
ORDERFD, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and moss-claims<br />
against defendant Consolidated Edison Company of New York, Inc., be and the same are hereby<br />
- I I I - - - - - - -<br />
dismissed with prejudice and without costs.<br />
WEITZ & LUXENBERG, P.C.<br />
Attorneys for Plaintiff<br />
700 Broadway<br />
New York, NY 100035<br />
York, Inc.<br />
4 Irving Place<br />
New York, NY 10003-3598<br />
SO ORDERED: ------.--- I<br />
Hon. Sherry Klein Heitler<br />
Our File No APR 2 6 20<strong>11</strong><br />
S-4 147-06<br />
t!F'$V ':"ORK<br />
LURK!$ ~~~~~
-<br />
3 .<br />
c<br />
Th4c:CCCjpk)<br />
1 Of 1 5/09<br />
SUPREME COURT : ALL COUNTIES<br />
w<br />
IN RE NEW YORK CITY ASBESTOS LITIGATION, <strong>11</strong>4377/01 and <strong>11</strong>7394/06<br />
ASSIGNED TO.<br />
____________________----~-~--.-<br />
"-----------""""-----------~.~"-....-~"~~~-<br />
HON. SHERRY nEIN HEITLER<br />
THIS DOCUMENT RELATES TO:<br />
NO OPPOSITION SUMMARY<br />
EDWARD MARTINI<br />
JUDGMENT MOTION AND<br />
ORDER<br />
WEREFORE, defendant Consolidated Edison Company of New York, Inc,<br />
hereby requests summary judgment in the aboveentitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law<br />
and Rules Section 3212, dismissing plaintiffs complaint against defendant Consolidated Edison<br />
Company of New York, hc. with prejudice, and there being no opposition thereto,<br />
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claim and cross-claims<br />
against defendant Consolidated Eclison Company af New York, Inc., be and the same are hereby<br />
- - -- - - - -- ---_I_" I-__ A _ -<br />
dismissed with prejudice and without costs.<br />
Dated: New Y k, New York<br />
7/f/lI<br />
_ _ - - - __ I<br />
Benjhn Darche, Esq.<br />
WEITZ & LUXENBERG, P.C.<br />
Attorneys for Plaintiff<br />
700 Broadway<br />
New Yo& NY 100035<br />
Consolidated Edison Company of New<br />
York, Inc.<br />
4 Irving Place<br />
New Ykk,NY 100 3- 598<br />
r!!! 8 1 Gn<br />
Our File No<br />
S-6783-01
i<br />
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK<br />
ALL COUNTIES WITHIN NEW YORK CITY<br />
________---I___-----_____________<br />
-X<br />
IN RE: NEW YORK COUNTY<br />
ASBESTOS LITIGATION<br />
.....................................<br />
This Document Relates to:<br />
Angeline King, Individually and as<br />
Administratrix for the Estate of John<br />
M. King,<br />
Plaintiff,<br />
- against -<br />
A.O. Smith Water Products Co., et al.,<br />
-X<br />
NYCAL<br />
I.A.S. Part 30<br />
(Judge Heitler)<br />
Index No.: 100678/07<br />
NO OPPOSITION<br />
SUMMARY JUDMNT<br />
MOTION AND ORDER<br />
Defendants.<br />
-X<br />
WHEREFORE, defendant Mario & DiBono Plastering Co. Inc,<br />
hereby requests summary judgment in the above-entitled cas€<br />
pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section §321;<br />
dismissing plaintiffs' Complaint against defendant Mario<br />
DiBono Plastering Co.<br />
Inc., with prejudice, and there being r<br />
opposition thereto,<br />
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all clairr<br />
and cross claims against defendant Mario & DiBono Plastering Cc<br />
Inc., be dismissed with prejudice and without cos F s. D<br />
APR 2 6 20<strong>11</strong><br />
Weitz & Luxenberg, P.C.<br />
Attorneys for Plaintiff<br />
Angeline King, Individually and<br />
as Administratrix for the<br />
Estate of John M. King<br />
700 Broadway, 6th Floor<br />
New York, New York 10003<br />
F<br />
C len and Dykman LLP<br />
A torneys for Defendant<br />
Mario .& DiBono Plastering Co.<br />
Inc.<br />
177 Montague Street<br />
Brooklyn, New York <strong>11</strong>201<br />
(718) 855-9000<br />
?<br />
i
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK<br />
ALL COUNTIES WITHIN NEW YORK CITY<br />
X NYCAL<br />
IN RE: NEW YORK COUNTY I.A.S. Part 30<br />
ASBESTOS LITIGATION<br />
(Judge Heitler)<br />
___________________-________________I_<br />
X<br />
This Document Relates to: Index No.: 100678/07<br />
JOHN M. KING<br />
NO-OPPOSITION<br />
SUMMARY JUDGMENT<br />
Plaintiff,<br />
MOTION AND ORDER<br />
- against -<br />
A.O. SMITH WATER PRODUCTS CO., et al.,<br />
WHEREFORE,<br />
defendant BURNHAM LLC, hereby requests summar<br />
judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice La<br />
and Rules Section 53212, dismissing plaintiffs' Complaint agains<br />
defendant BURNHAM LLC, with prejudice, and there being n<br />
opposition thereto,<br />
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims an<br />
cross claims against defendant BURNHAM LLC, be dismissed wit<br />
prejudice and without costs.<br />
Weitz & Luxenberg,<br />
Attorneys for Plaintiff Attorneys for Defendant<br />
John M. King Burnham LLC<br />
700 Broadway, 6th Floor 177 Montague Street<br />
New York, New York 10003 Brooklyn, New York <strong>11</strong><br />
212-558-5500 (718) 855-9000<br />
Our File No. :<br />
SO ORDERED:<br />
--<br />
Hen. Sherry K. Heitler
NYCAL<br />
I.A.S. Part 30<br />
Hon. Sherry Klein Heitler, J.S.C.<br />
ELIZABETH H. BARNES, INDIVIDUALLY AND AS EXECUTRIX OF<br />
THE ESTATE OF LE ROY A. BARNES, JR.,<br />
Index No.: 103121-2007<br />
-against-<br />
Plaintiffs,<br />
NO OPPOSITION SUMMARY JUDGMENT<br />
MOTION AND ORDER<br />
A.O. SMITH WATER PRODUCTS et at. including,<br />
GENERAL ELECTRIC COMPANY,<br />
Defendants.<br />
WHEREFORE, defendant GENERAL ELECTRIC COMPANY hereby request summary judgment in<br />
the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212, dismissing plaintiffs'<br />
complaint against defendant GENERAL ELECTRIC COMPANY with prejudice, and there being no<br />
opposition thereto,<br />
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against defendant<br />
GENERAL ELECTRIC COMPANY be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and without costs.<br />
Attorney for Plain tvfs<br />
546 Fifth Avenue, qfh Floor<br />
New York, New York 10036<br />
Stephen Novakidis, Esq.<br />
Sedgwick, Detert, Moran & Arnold, LLP<br />
Attorneys for General Electric<br />
Three Gateway Center, 12fh Flo<br />
Newark, NJ 07102<br />
SO ORDERED,
SUPREME COIJK'L' OF THE STATE OF NEW Y ORK<br />
-_- COUNTY OF NEW YORK<br />
IN RE: NEW YOKK com'ry<br />
j NYCAL<br />
ASBESTOS LITIGATJ ON<br />
i I.A.S. Part 30<br />
j (IIeitler, J.)<br />
THIS DOCUMENT REFERS TO:<br />
i Index No.: <strong>11</strong>9388/00,<br />
. ANNA __ E. BLENKENSOPP, INDIVIDUALLY !<br />
AND PERSONAL mPRESENTATIVE FOR<br />
j<br />
THE ESTATE OF DAVID BLENKENSOPP,<br />
-against-<br />
[ NO OPPOSITION<br />
i SUMMARY JUDGMENT<br />
Plaintiffs, \ MOTION AND ORDER<br />
A. C. & S., TNC., et al.,<br />
-<br />
Defendants. 1<br />
WHEREFORE, defendant, Courter & Company, Inc., hereby requests summary<br />
judgment in the above entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules 5 3212, dismissing<br />
plaintiffs' complaint against defendant, Courter & Company, Inc., with prejudice in this action,<br />
and there being no opposition thereto,<br />
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against<br />
defendant, Courter & Company, Inc., be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and<br />
without costs.<br />
Attorney for Defendant<br />
Courter & Company, Inc.<br />
MCGIWY & KLUGER, P.C.<br />
80 Broad Street-Suite 2300<br />
New York, New York 100<strong>04</strong><br />
(212) 509-3456<br />
SO ORDERED,<br />
Estate of David Blenkensopp ikensopp<br />
WEITZ & LUXENBERG,<br />
YENBERG, P.C.<br />
700 Broadway<br />
New York, New lew York 10003<br />
I<br />
APR 2 6 20<strong>11</strong><br />
N0<strong>04</strong><strong>04</strong>78-1
~ COUN‘I’Y<br />
SUPREME COURl’ OF ‘1XE STATE OF NEW YORK<br />
I __-- OF NEW YORK - -<br />
IN RE: NEW YORK COUNTY j NYCAL<br />
ASBESTOS LITIGATION<br />
j I.A.S. Part 3U<br />
0<br />
j (HeitIer,.I.)<br />
‘ms<br />
-_i<br />
DOCUMENT REFERS TO:<br />
j Index No.: <strong>11</strong>9388/0 , 1<strong>04</strong>633/07<br />
ANNA E. BLENKENSOPP, INDIVIDUALLY<br />
AND PERSONAL REPFSSENTATIVE FOR<br />
THE ESTATE OF DAVID BLENKENSOPP, i NO OPPOSITION<br />
i SUMMARY JUDGMENT<br />
Plaintiffs, ; MOTION AND ORDER<br />
-against-<br />
A. C. & S., INC., et ul.,<br />
Defendants. ;<br />
WHEREFORE, defendant, Safeguard Industrial Equipment Co., hereby requests<br />
summary judgment in the above entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules § 3212,<br />
dismissing plaintiffs’ complaint against defendant, Safeguard Industrial Equipment Co., with<br />
prejudice in this action, and there being no opposition thereto,<br />
OTCDEmD, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against<br />
defendant, Safeguard Industrial Equipment Co., be and the same are hereby dismissed with<br />
prejudice and without costs.<br />
Attorney for Plaintiffs<br />
Estate of David Blenkensopp F 1 L ‘’E D<br />
Safeguard Industrial Equipment Co.<br />
MCGIVNEY & KLUGER, P.C.<br />
WEITZ & LUXENBERG, P.C.<br />
80 Broad Street-Suite 2300<br />
700 Broadway<br />
New York, New York 100<strong>04</strong> New York 10003 /%pR 2 6 20<strong>11</strong><br />
(212) 509-3456<br />
NEW YORK<br />
SO ORDERED,<br />
wn<br />
324-5661A<br />
URKS OFF\@<br />
N0<strong>04</strong><strong>04</strong>78-1
I Defendants.<br />
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YOW<br />
COUNTY OF NEW YORK -<br />
IN RE: NEW YORK COUNTY<br />
I NYCAL<br />
0<br />
ASBESTOS LlTIGATION<br />
: 1.A.S. Part 3<br />
i (Heitler, J.)<br />
THIS DOCUMENT REFERS TO:<br />
j Index No.: <strong>11</strong>9388/0 , 1<strong>04</strong>633/07<br />
ANNA E. BLENRENSOPP, INDIVIDUALLY<br />
i<br />
AND PERSONAL REPRESENTATIVE FOR<br />
j<br />
THE ESTATE OF DAVlD BLENKENSOPP, : NO OPPOSITION<br />
SUMMARY JUDGMENT<br />
Plaintiffs, j MOTION AND ORDER<br />
- --<br />
-against-<br />
A. C. & S., INC., etal.,<br />
i<br />
. WHEREFORE,' defendant, Patterson Pump Co., hereby requests summary judgment in<br />
the above entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules 5 3212, dismissing plaintiffs'<br />
complaint against defendant, Patterson Pump Co., with prejudice in this action, and there being<br />
<strong>11</strong>0 opposition thereto,<br />
' ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against<br />
defendant, Patterson Pump Co., be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and without<br />
costs.<br />
1 Dated: New York, New York<br />
0<strong>11</strong><br />
A<br />
80 Broad Street-Suite 2300<br />
700 Broadway<br />
New York, New York 100<strong>04</strong> York10003 kp[i 2 6 20<strong>11</strong><br />
(2 12) 509-3456<br />
SO ORDERED,<br />
!'ti ..2' ':" C) (4 jS*<br />
MJUh TY CLLRKI'S OFFICE'<br />
454-9039<br />
N0<strong>04</strong><strong>04</strong>7X-1
SUPREME COURT OF THE sm-rE OF NEW YORK<br />
COUNTY OF NEW YORK<br />
- - ~ -<br />
IN RE: NEW YORK COUNTY<br />
j NYCAL<br />
ASBESTOS LITIGATION<br />
j I.A.S. Part 30<br />
- j (IIeitler, J.)<br />
’THIS DOCUMENT REFERS TO:<br />
0<br />
i Index No.: <strong>11</strong>9388/0 1<strong>04</strong>633/07<br />
ANNA E. BLENKENSOPP, INDIVIDUALLY<br />
AND PERSONAL REPRESENTATIVE FOR<br />
THE ESTATE OF DAVID BLENKENSOPP, i NO OPPOSITION<br />
j SUMMARY JUDGMENT<br />
Plaintiffs, i MOTION AND ORDER<br />
-against-<br />
A. C. & S., INC., et al.,<br />
.-<br />
Defendants.<br />
j<br />
WHEREFORE, defendant, Tishman Liquidating Corp., hereby requests summary<br />
judgment in the above entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules 5 3212, dismissing<br />
plaintiffs’ complaint against defendant, Tishman Liquidating Corp., with prejudice in this action,<br />
and there being no opposition thereto,<br />
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against<br />
defendant, Tishman Liquidating Corp., be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and<br />
without costs.<br />
Estate of David BIenkenso<br />
WEITZ & LUXENBERG, P.C<br />
80 Broad Street-Suite 2300<br />
700 Broadway<br />
New York, New York 100<strong>04</strong> York10003 ApR 2 6 20<strong>11</strong><br />
(212) 509-3456<br />
SO ORDERED,<br />
NEb ! ,‘t:q$L<br />
COkrNTY CLERK‘S QFFlCE’<br />
Hon. Sherry Klein Heitler 2383-22469 27650<br />
N0<strong>04</strong><strong>04</strong>78-1<br />
1 5 20 fl
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK<br />
COUNTY OF NEW YORK<br />
IN RE: NEW YORK CITY ASBESTOS LITIGATION<br />
................................................................. X<br />
This Document Relates To:<br />
ANNA E. BLENKENSOPP, as Personal<br />
Representative for the Estate of DAVID<br />
BLENKENSOPP and ANNA E. BLENKENSOPP,<br />
Individually,<br />
: NYCAL<br />
* I.A.S. Part 30<br />
: (Hen. Sheny Klein Heitler)<br />
Plaintiff( s),<br />
: Index No.: 1<strong>04</strong>633-07<br />
-against-<br />
A.O. SMITH WATER PRODUCTS CO., et al.,<br />
NO-OPPOSITION SUMMARY<br />
: JUDGMENT MOTION AND<br />
: ORDER<br />
WHEREFORE, defendant CRANE CO. hereby requests summary judgment in the<br />
above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212, dismissing<br />
plaintiff's complaint against defendant CRANE CO, with prejudice, and there being no<br />
opposition thereto,<br />
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against<br />
defendant CRANE CO. be, and the same are hereby, dismissed with prejudice and without costs.<br />
Dated: 3 \ 3 o\ [\<br />
Attorneys for Plaintiff(s)<br />
700 Broadway CRANE CO, c o u ~ ~<br />
New York, NY 10003<br />
(212) 558-5500<br />
599 Lexington Avenue<br />
New York, NY 10022<br />
(212) 536-3900<br />
CLERKS OFFICE<br />
SO ORDERED,<br />
Hon. Sherry Klein Heitler<br />
APR 1520<strong>11</strong>
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK<br />
COUNTY OF NEW YORK<br />
IN RE<br />
NEW YORK CITY ASBESTOS LITIGATION<br />
X<br />
X<br />
NYCAL<br />
I.A.S. Part 30<br />
JOEL GARLAND, Index No. <strong>11</strong>1905-2007<br />
-against-<br />
Plaintiff,<br />
A.O. SMITH WATER PRODUCTS, et al., including<br />
GENERAL ELECTRIC COMPANY,<br />
NO OPPOSITION<br />
SUMMARY JUDGMENT MOTION AND<br />
ORDER<br />
Defendants.<br />
X<br />
WHEREFORE, defendant General Electric Company hereby request summary judgment in the<br />
above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212, dismissing plaintiffs’<br />
complaint against defendant General Electric Company with prejudice, and there being no opposition<br />
thereto,<br />
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against defendant<br />
General Electric Company be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and without costs.<br />
Dated:<br />
New York, New York<br />
MAfk1( 30,20 I<br />
546 Fifth Avenue, qfh Floor<br />
New York, New York 10036<br />
Stephen Novakidis, Esq.<br />
Sedgwick, Detert, Moran & Arnold, LLP<br />
Attorneys for General Electric Compan<br />
Three Gateway Center, 1Topr<br />
Newark, NJ 07102 *, d”<br />
SO ORDERED,
WHEREFORE, defendant Consolidated ESdison Company of New York, Inc.<br />
hereby requests summary judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law<br />
and Rules Section 3212, dismissing plaintifPs complaint against defendant Consolidated Fdison<br />
Company of New York, Inc. with prejudice, and there being no opposition thereto,<br />
ORDEFLED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, dl claims and cross-claims<br />
against defendant Consolidated Edisan Company of New York, Inc., be and the same are hereby<br />
Attorneys for Plaintiff<br />
180 Maiden Lane<br />
New York, NY 100384925<br />
Consolidated Edison Company of New<br />
York, Inc.
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK<br />
ALL COUNTIES WITHIN NEW YORK CITY<br />
..................................... -X<br />
IN RE: NEW YORK COUNTY<br />
ASBESTOS LITIGATION<br />
This Document Relates to:<br />
Ann Shaw, as Executrix for the Estate<br />
of Nathan Glowatz,<br />
- against -<br />
Plaintiff,<br />
A.O. Smith Water Products Co., et al.,<br />
NYCAL<br />
I.A.S. Part 30<br />
(Judge Heitler)<br />
Index No.: <strong>11</strong>6794/07<br />
NO OPPOSITION<br />
SUMMARY JUDGMENT<br />
MOTION AND ORDER<br />
Defendants.<br />
..................................... -X<br />
WHEREFORE, defendant Mario & DiBono Plastering Co. Inc.,<br />
hereby requests summary judgment in the above-entitled case,<br />
pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section §3212,<br />
dismissing plaintiffs' Complaint against defendant Mario 6<br />
DiBono Plastering Co. Inc., with prejudice, and there being nc<br />
opposition thereto,<br />
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claimE<br />
and cross claims against defendant Mario & DiBono Plastering Co.<br />
Inc. , be dismissed with prejudice and without cos<br />
Dated:<br />
Brooklyn, New York<br />
YlrL / 20<strong>11</strong><br />
E,<br />
Michael Fanelli, Esq.<br />
Weitz & Luxenberg, P.C.<br />
Attorneys for Plaintiff<br />
Ann Shaw, as Executrix for the<br />
Estate of Nathan Glowatz<br />
700 Broadway, 6th Floor 177 Montague Street<br />
New York, New York 10003 Brooklyn, New York <strong>11</strong>201<br />
(718) 855-9000<br />
i-<br />
r File No.: 10924-5662<br />
So Ordered: Hon. Sherry K. Heitler AI% d 5 %Ill1<br />
Mario & DiBono Plastering Co.<br />
Inc.<br />
E
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK<br />
ALL COUNTIES WITHIN NEW YORK CITY<br />
___________-___---_-_______I__________<br />
X<br />
IN RE: NEW YORK COUNTY<br />
ASBESTOS LITIGATION<br />
___l____l_____l____________________I__<br />
X<br />
This Document Relates to:<br />
NATHAN GLOWATZ<br />
- against -<br />
Plaintiff,<br />
NYCAL '<br />
I.A.S. P art 30<br />
(Judge Heitler)<br />
Index No.: <strong>11</strong>6794/07<br />
NO-OPPOSITION<br />
SUMMARY JUDGMENT<br />
MOTION AND ORDER<br />
A.O. SMITH WATER PRODUCTS CO.,<br />
et al.,<br />
WHEREFORE, defendant BURNHAM LLC, hereby requests sumrnai<br />
judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice LE<br />
and Rules Section 53212, dismissing plaintiffs' Complaint again:<br />
defendant BURNHAM LLC, with prejudice, and there being r<br />
opposition thereto,<br />
ORDERED,<br />
that upon notice to a<strong>11</strong> co-defendants, all claims ar<br />
cross claims against defendant BURNHAM LLC,<br />
prejudice and without costs.<br />
ApR 2 6 'O'<br />
e)<br />
Cullen and Dykman LLP<br />
Attorneys for Plaintiff Attorneys for Defendant<br />
Nathan Glowatz<br />
Burn ham L LC<br />
700 Broadway, 6th Floor 177 Montague Street<br />
New York, New York 10003 Brooklyn, New York <strong>11</strong>201<br />
212-558-5500 (718) 855-9000<br />
Our File No.: <strong>11</strong>084-1451<br />
SO ORDERED:<br />
-
____-ll------__-----___________I______<br />
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK<br />
ALL COUNTIES WITHIN NEW YORK CITY<br />
___l-lfll----__-----------------------<br />
X<br />
IN RE: NEW YORK COUNTY<br />
ASBESTOS LITIGATION<br />
X<br />
This Document Relates to:<br />
FELIX M. JUZDOWSKI<br />
Plaintiff,<br />
NYCAL<br />
1.A.S. Part 30<br />
(Judge Heitler)<br />
Index No.: <strong>11</strong>6796/07<br />
NO-OPPOSITION<br />
SUMMARY JUDGMENT<br />
MOTION AND ORDER<br />
- against -<br />
A.O. SMITH WATER PRODUCTS CO., et al.,<br />
WHEREFORE,<br />
defendant BURNHAM LLC,<br />
hereby requests summar<br />
judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice La<br />
and Rules Section 53212, dismissing plaintiffs’ Complaint agains<br />
defendant BURNHAM LLC, with<br />
prejudice, and there being n<br />
opposition thereto,<br />
ORDERED,<br />
that upon notice to all co-defendants, a ll claims an<br />
cross claims against defendant BURNHAM LLC, be dismissed wit<br />
prejudice and without costs.<br />
Cullen and Dykman LLP<br />
Attorneys for Plaintiff Attorneys for Defendant<br />
Felix M. Juzdowski<br />
Bum ham LLC<br />
700 Broadway, 6t’’ Floor 177 Montague Street<br />
New York, New York 10003 Brooklyn, New York<br />
212-558-5500 (718) 855-9000<br />
Our File No.:
I___-A -<br />
NYCAL<br />
I.A.S. Part 30<br />
Hon. Sherry Klein Heitler, J.S.C.<br />
JAMES RUDGE and SONIA RUDGE,<br />
Index No.: 102239-2008<br />
Plaintiffs,<br />
-against-<br />
NO OPPOSITION SUMMARY JUDGMENT<br />
MOTION AND ORDER<br />
I<br />
A.O. SMITH WATER PRODUCTS, et al. including<br />
GENERAL ELECTRIC COMPANY,<br />
Defendants.<br />
WHEREFORE, defendant GENERAL ELECTRIC COMPANY hereby request summary judgment in the<br />
above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212, dismissing plaintiffs'<br />
complaint against defendant GENERAL ELECTRIC COMPANY with prejudice, and there being no<br />
opposition thereto,<br />
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against defendant<br />
GENERAL ELECTRIC COMPANY be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and without costs.<br />
Dated:<br />
New York, New York<br />
flAK.Cd 30.20\ I<br />
Attorneys for Plaintiffs<br />
546 Fifth Avenue, 4'h Floor<br />
New York, New York 10036<br />
SO ORDERED,<br />
r)<br />
-<br />
Stephen Novakidis, Esq.<br />
Sedgwick, Detert, Moran & Arnold, LLP<br />
Attorneys for General Electric Company<br />
Three Gateway Center, 12th Floor<br />
Newark, NJ 07102<br />
-<br />
p R 2 6 20<strong>11</strong><br />
FILED<br />
NJD03247vl
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK<br />
COUNTY OF NEW YORK<br />
~____<br />
.~<br />
IN RE NEW YORK CITY ASBESTOS LITIGATION NYCAL<br />
VICTOR REYNIAK AND SYBILLE REYNIAK, Index No. 10<strong>26</strong>88/2008<br />
X<br />
-against-<br />
Plaintiffs,<br />
BARNSTEAD INTERNATIONAL, et al., including<br />
GENERAL ELECTRIC COMPANY,<br />
NO OPPOSITION<br />
SUMMARY JUDGMENT MOTION AND<br />
ORDER<br />
Defendants.<br />
X<br />
WHEREFORE, defendant General Electric Company hereby request summary judgment in the<br />
above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212, dismissing plaintiffs'<br />
complaint against defendant General Electric Company with prejudice, and there being no opposition<br />
thereto,<br />
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against defendant<br />
General Electric Company be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and without co s.<br />
FILED '5<br />
Dated:<br />
New York, New York<br />
MAW! 30.201 I<br />
546 Fifth Avenue, qfh Floor<br />
New York, NY 10036<br />
Sedgwick, Detert, Moran & Arnold, LLP<br />
Attorneys for General Electric Company<br />
Three Gateway Center, 12'h Floor<br />
Newark, NJ 07102<br />
SO ORDERED,<br />
A M 1520<strong>11</strong>
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK<br />
COUNTY OF NEW YORK<br />
IN RE: NEW YORK COUNTY i NYCAL<br />
ASBESTOS LITIGATION<br />
j I.A.S. Part 30<br />
i (Heitler, J.)<br />
THIS DOCUMENT REFERS TO:<br />
Index No.: 190020/08<br />
RICHARD R. PAUL,<br />
-against-<br />
A. C. & S., INC., et al.,<br />
Plaintiffs,<br />
NO OPPOSITION<br />
SUMMARY JUDGMENT<br />
MOTION AND ORDER<br />
Defendants. /<br />
WHEREFORE, defendant, Flowserve Corporation f/k/a The Duriron Company, Inc.,<br />
I<br />
hereby requests summary judgment in the above entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law<br />
and Rules 6 3212, dismissing plaintiffs' complaint against defendant, Flowserve Corporation<br />
fMa The Duriron Company, Inc., with prejudice in this action, and there being no opposition<br />
thereto,<br />
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against<br />
defendant, Flowserve Corporation fMa The Duriron Company, Inc., be and the same are hereby<br />
dismissed with prejudice and without costs.<br />
Matthew T. Fairley, Esq.<br />
Attorney for Defendant<br />
Attorney for Plaintiffs<br />
Flowserve Corporation<br />
Richard R. Paul<br />
MCGWNEY & KLUGER, P.C.<br />
Weitz & Luxenberg, P.C.<br />
80 Broad Street-Suite 2300<br />
700 Broadway<br />
New York, New York 100<strong>04</strong><br />
New York, New York 1OOO$=<br />
(212) 509-3456 (212) 558-5500<br />
I L E D<br />
SO ORDERED, APR 2 6 20<strong>11</strong><br />
Hon. Sherry Klein Heitler<br />
951-0823 NEW YORK<br />
COUNTY CLERKS OFFICE<br />
NO03895 1
.-<br />
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YON<br />
COUNTY OF NEW YORK<br />
IN RE: NEW YORK COUNTY<br />
! NYCAL<br />
ASBESTOS LITIGATION<br />
i I.A.S. Part 30<br />
[ (Heitler, J.)<br />
THIS DOCUMENT REFERS TO:<br />
i Index No.: 190020/08<br />
RICHARD R. PAUL,<br />
-against-<br />
A. C. & S., INC., et al.,<br />
Plaintiffs, \ NO OPPOSITION<br />
! SUMMARY JUDGMENT<br />
i MOTION AND ORDER<br />
Defendants.<br />
WHEREFORE, defendant, Aurora Pump Company, hereby requests summary judgment<br />
in the above entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules 9 3212, dismissing<br />
plaintiffs’ complaint against defendant, Aurora Pump Company, with prejudice in this action,<br />
and there being no opposition thereto,<br />
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against<br />
defendant, Aurora Pump Company, be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and<br />
without costs.<br />
Aurora Pump Company<br />
MCG~VNEY & KLUGER, P.C.<br />
80 Broad Street-Suite 2300<br />
New York, New York 100<strong>04</strong><br />
Richard R. Paul<br />
Weitz & Luxenberg,<br />
700Broadway 1 E<br />
New York, New York 10003<br />
1003-0<strong>26</strong>1<br />
N0038955-1
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK<br />
COUNTY OF NEW YORK<br />
NYCAL<br />
I.A.S. Part 30<br />
Hon. Sherry Klein Heitler, J.S.C.<br />
JOHN 1. VAUGHAN and MARY VAUGHAN, Index No,: 190051-2009<br />
-against-<br />
Plaintiffs,<br />
NO OPPOSITION SUMMARY JUDGMENT<br />
MOTION AND ORDER<br />
A.O. SMITH WATER PRODUCEi CO. et al., including<br />
FOSTER WHEELER, L.L.C.,<br />
Defendants.<br />
WHEREFORE, defendant FOSTER WHEELER, L.L.C. hereby request summary judgment in the<br />
above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212, dismissing plaintiff's<br />
complaint against defendant FOSTER WHEELER, L.L.C. with prejudice, and there being no opposition<br />
thereto,<br />
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against defendant<br />
FOSTER WHEELER, L.L.C. be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and without costs.<br />
Weitz & Luxenberg, P.C.<br />
Attorneys for Plointffs<br />
700 Broadway<br />
New York, New York 10003 fl<br />
SO ORDERED,<br />
Hon. Sherry Klein. Heitler, J.S.C.<br />
Attorneys for Foster Wheeler, L. L. C.<br />
Three Gateway Center, 12fh Floor<br />
Newark, NJ 07102<br />
FILE<br />
APR 2 6 20<strong>11</strong><br />
NEW YORK<br />
CQUNTY CLERK'S OFFICE'
NYC<br />
I.A.S. Part 30<br />
Hon. Sherry Klein Heitler, J.S.C.<br />
WILLIAM D. SAKSEN JR. and ANNA SAKSEN,<br />
Index No.: 190061-2009<br />
-against-<br />
Plaintiffs,<br />
NO OPPOSITION SUMMARY JUDGMENT<br />
MOTION AND ORDER<br />
A.O. SMITH WATER PRODUCTS COMPANY et al. including,<br />
FOSTER WHEELER, L.L.C.,<br />
Defendants,<br />
WHEREFORE, defendant Foster Wheeler, L.L.C. hereby request summary judgment in the aboveentitled<br />
case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212, dismissing plaintiff's complaint<br />
against defendant Foster Wheeler, L.L.C. with prejudice, and there being no opposition thereto,<br />
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against defendant<br />
Foster Wheeler, L.L.C. be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and without costs.<br />
Dated:<br />
New York. New York<br />
Frank Ortiz, Esq.<br />
Weitz 81 Luxenberg, P.C.<br />
Attorney for Plaintvfs<br />
700 Broadway<br />
New York, New York 10003<br />
(212) 558-5500<br />
n I<br />
Dennis E. Vega, Esq.<br />
Sedgwick,<br />
Attorneys for Foster Wheeler, L. L.C.<br />
Three Gateway Center, 12' ~ QLED 1<br />
Newark, NJ 07102<br />
(973) 242-0002<br />
APR 2 6 20<strong>11</strong><br />
so ORDERED,<br />
NEW YORK<br />
;ml Hon. Sherry Klein Heitler<br />
W-Y CLERK'S OFFICE'<br />
NU256 127v 1
GREGORY AUGUSTINOWICZ and RUTH AUGUSTINOWICZ, Index No.: 19009 1-2 009<br />
-against-<br />
Plaintiffs,<br />
NO OPPOSITION SUMMARY JUDGMENT<br />
MOTION AND ORDER<br />
BUFFALO PUMPS, INC. et ai., including<br />
FOSTER WHEELER, L.L.C.,<br />
Defendants.<br />
WHEREFORE, defendant FOSTER WHEELER, L.L.C. hereby request summary judgment in the<br />
above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212, dismissing plaintiffs<br />
complaint against defendant FOSTER WHEELER, L.L.C. with prejudice, and there being no opposition<br />
thereto,<br />
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against defendant<br />
FOSTER WHEELER, L.L.C. be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and without costs.<br />
Dated:<br />
New York. NeN Vnrk<br />
Frank Ortiz, Esq. Dennis E. Vega, 0<br />
Weitr & Luxenberg, P.C.<br />
Attorneys for Plaintqfs<br />
700 Broadway<br />
New York, New York 10003<br />
Sedgwick, Detert, Moran & Arnold, LLP<br />
Attorneys for Foster Wheeler, LLC<br />
Three Gateway Center, 12‘h<br />
Newark, NJ 07102<br />
SO ORDERED,<br />
Hon. Sherry Klein Heitler, J.S.C.<br />
APR 2 6 20<strong>11</strong><br />
NEW YORK<br />
r;c)uNly CLERK‘S OFFICE!<br />
NJl<strong>26</strong>7896v I
SUPREME COWRT OF THE STATE OF NEW YON<br />
COUNTY OF NEW YO=,<br />
I WCAL
NYCAL<br />
I.A.S. Part 30<br />
Hon. Sherry Klein Heitler, J.S.C.<br />
JOHN SAKATIS AND MYRNA SAKATIS,<br />
-against-<br />
Plaintiffs,<br />
A.O. SMITH WATER PRODUCTS CO., et al., including FOSTER<br />
WHEELER, L.L.C.,<br />
Index No.: 190146-2009<br />
NO OPPOSITION SUMMARY JUDGMENT<br />
MOTION AND ORDER<br />
Defendants.<br />
WHEREFORE, defendant FOSTER WHEELER, L.L.C. hereby request summary judgment in the<br />
above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212, dismissing plaintiff’s<br />
complaint against defendant FOSTER WHEELER, L.L.C. with prejudice, and there being no opposition<br />
thereto,<br />
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against defendant<br />
FOSTER WHEELER, L.L.C. be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and without costs.<br />
SEDGWI<br />
Frank Ortiz, Esq.<br />
Attorneys for P/aint,ffs<br />
700 Broadway<br />
New York, NY 10003<br />
(212) 558-5500 (973) 242-0002<br />
Dennis E.<br />
Attorneys for Foster Wheeler, L. L. C.<br />
Three Gateway Center, 12th Floor<br />
Newark, NJ 07102<br />
SO ORDERED,<br />
Hon. Sherry Klein Heitler<br />
ApR 2 6 20’’<br />
NU<strong>26</strong>795 I v 1
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK<br />
COUNTY OF NEW YORK<br />
.....................................................................<br />
IN RE: NEW YORK CITY<br />
ASBESTOS LITIGATION<br />
.....................................................................<br />
THOMAS LEAHY AND EVELYN LEAHY,<br />
X<br />
X<br />
NYCAL<br />
I.A.S. Part 30<br />
Hon. Sherry Klein Heitler, J.S.C.<br />
Index No.: 190162-2009<br />
3 M COMPANY et al. including,<br />
GENERAL ELECTRIC COMPANY,<br />
-against-<br />
Plaintiffs,<br />
NO OPPOSITION SUMMARY JUDGMENT<br />
MOTION AND ORDER<br />
Defendants.<br />
WHEREFORE, defendant GENERAL ELECTRIC COMPANY hereby request summary judgment in<br />
the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212, dismissing'plaintiffs'<br />
complaint against defendant GENERAL ELECTRIC COMPANY with prejudice, and there being no<br />
opposition thereto,<br />
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against defendant<br />
GENERAL ELECTRIC COMPANY be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and without costs.<br />
Belluck & Fox, LLP<br />
Attorney for Plaintffs<br />
546 Fifth Avenue, 4th Floor<br />
New York, New York 100<br />
Stephen Nomidis, Esq.<br />
Sedgwick, Detert, Moran & Arnold, LLP<br />
Attorneys for General Electric Company<br />
Three Gateway Center, 12fh Floor<br />
Newark, NJ 07102<br />
FILED<br />
SO ORDERED, APR 2 6 20<strong>11</strong><br />
NEW YORK<br />
COUNTY CLERK'S OFFICE<br />
Al'l? 15 20<strong>11</strong><br />
NJl432735vl
NYCAL<br />
I.A.S. Part 30<br />
Hon. Sherry Klein Heitler, J.S.C.<br />
FRANCISCO SALDIVAR,<br />
Index No.: 190228-2009<br />
-against-<br />
Plaintiffs,<br />
NO OPPOSITION SUMMARY JUDGMENT<br />
MOTION AND ORDER<br />
A.O. SMITH WATER PRODUCTS, INC et al. including, GENERAL<br />
ELECTRIC COMPANY,<br />
Defendants.<br />
WHEREFORE, defendant GENERAL ELECTRIC COMPANY hereby request summary judgment in<br />
the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212, dismissing plaintiffs'<br />
complaint against defendant GENERAL ELECTRIC COMPANY with prejudice, and there being no<br />
opposition thereto,<br />
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against defendant<br />
GENERAL ELECTRIC COMPANY be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and without costs.<br />
Dated:<br />
New York, New York<br />
Stephen Novakidis, Esq.<br />
Sedgwick, Detert, Moran & Arnold, LLP<br />
Attorney for Plaintgfs Attorneys for General Electric Y<br />
546 Fifth Avenue, qfh Floor Three Gateway Center, 12'h Flo L<br />
New York, New York 10934, Newark, NJ 07102<br />
APR 2 6 20<strong>11</strong><br />
D<br />
SO ORDERED,<br />
NEW YORK<br />
COUNTY CLERK'S OFFICE<br />
NJ/377998vl
NYCAL<br />
I.A.S. Part 30<br />
Hon. Sherry Klein Heitler, J.S.C.<br />
KATHRYN THAUT, AS EXECUTRIX OF THE ESTATE OF RODNEY<br />
THAUT, DECEASED,<br />
Index No.: 190333-2009<br />
-against-<br />
Plaintiffs,<br />
NO OPPOSITION SUMMARY JUDGMENT<br />
MOTION AND ORDER<br />
A.O. SMITH WATER PRODUCTS et al. including,<br />
GENERAL ELECTRIC COMPANY,<br />
Defendants.<br />
WHEREFORE, defendant GENERAL ELECTRIC COMPANY hereby request summary judgment in<br />
the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212, dismissing plaintiffs'<br />
complaint against defendant GENERAL ELECTRIC COMPANY with prejudice, and there being no<br />
opposition thereto,<br />
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against defendant<br />
GENERAL ELECTRIC COMPANY be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and without costs.<br />
Dated: ANew York,m York<br />
7<br />
Ked W. Belluck, Esq.<br />
Stephen Novakidis, Esq.<br />
Belljck & Fox, LLP<br />
Sedgwick, Detert, Moran & Arnold, LLP<br />
Attorney for Plain tiffs Attorneys for General El tric Company<br />
546 Fifth Avenue, qfh Floor Three Gateway Center, @' l o t E D<br />
New York, New York 10036 Newark, NJ 07102<br />
SO ORDERED,<br />
Hon. Sherry Klein Heitler<br />
APR 2 6 20<strong>11</strong><br />
NEW YORK<br />
~O~~+l"'Y CLERK'S OFFICE<br />
N J/403242v 1
~ ~ ~ ~~ ~ .~<br />
1-<br />
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK<br />
COUNTY OF NEW YORK<br />
...<br />
In Re: NEW YORK CITYASBESTOS LITIGATION<br />
WILLIAM EDWARD TURNER and ZELLA<br />
FARIS ZELLA,<br />
Plaintiff(@,<br />
-against-<br />
Index No. : 190349/2009<br />
NO OPPOSITION<br />
SUMMARY JUDGMENT<br />
MOTION AND ORDER<br />
A.O. SMITH WATER PRODUCTS, et al.,<br />
Defendants.<br />
WHEREFORE, Defendant CURTISS-WRIGHT FLOW CONTROL CORPORATION,<br />
named Individually and as Successor to Farris Valves and/or Sprague Pumps (“CURTISS-<br />
WRIGHT”) hereby requests Summary Judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil<br />
Practice Law and Rules Section 3212, dismissing plaintiff‘s complaint against Defendant Curtiss-<br />
Wright with prejudice, and there being no opposition thereto,<br />
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against<br />
Defendant, Curtiss-Wright be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and without costs<br />
CAMBRIDGE<br />
850 Third Avenue, Suite 1 100<br />
New York, NY 10022
THOMAS WILLIAMS and<br />
KATHLEEN WILLIAMS, his wife,<br />
-against-<br />
Plaintiffs,<br />
NEW YORK CITY ASBESTOS<br />
LITIGATION (NYCAL)<br />
ASBESTOS MATTER<br />
INDEX NO.: 190350/2009<br />
NO OPPOSITION SUMMARY<br />
JUDGMENT MOTION AND ORDER<br />
GENERAL ELECTRIC COMPANY, et al.<br />
WHEWFORE, defendant AMEC Construction Management, I C. (“ACMI”), sued<br />
incorrectly herein “individually, as successor to and formerly known as The Morse Diesel<br />
Company and Morse Diesel International, Inc.,” hereby requests summary judgment in the<br />
above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 32 12, dismissing<br />
Plaintiffs’ Complaint against defendant, ACMI with prejudice, and there being no opposition<br />
thereto,<br />
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and crossclaims against<br />
defendant ACMI be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and without costs.<br />
Dated: New Y rk, New York<br />
8 ,20<strong>11</strong><br />
Salvatore G. Gangemi<br />
<strong>11</strong>0 William Street, <strong>26</strong>‘h Floor<br />
700 White Plains Road, Suite 338<br />
New Yark, New York 10038<br />
Scarsdale, New York 10583<br />
(212) <strong>26</strong>7-3091 (914) 725-5800<br />
Attorneys for Plaintiffs<br />
Attorneys for Defendants AMEC
NYCAL<br />
I.A.S. Part 30<br />
(Judge Heitler)<br />
Index No. : 190350-2009<br />
-against-<br />
Plaintiffs,<br />
A. W. CHESTERTON COMPNAY, et a1 ,<br />
NO OPPOSITION<br />
SUMMARY JUDGMENT<br />
MOTION AND ORDER<br />
RE: APRIL 20<strong>11</strong> IN-<br />
WHEREFORE, defendant EX-FM, INC. f/k/a FISCHBACH & MOORE, INC.,<br />
hereby request summary judgement in the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law<br />
and Rules Section 3212, dismissing plaintiffs' complaint against defendant EX-FM, INC. f/k/a<br />
FISCHBACH & MOORE, INC., with prejudice, and there being no opposition thereto,<br />
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants all claims and cross claims against<br />
defendant EX-FM, INC. f/k/a FISCXXBACH & MOORE, INC., be and the same are hereby<br />
dismissed with prejudice and without costs.<br />
Dated: Albertson, New York<br />
/+: 1 $ ,20<strong>11</strong><br />
%<br />
KUSH SHUKLA, ESQ<br />
Wilentz Goldman & Spitzer, P.A.<br />
. .<br />
Attorcey fcr PlaLEaff---- - --- -. I<br />
<strong>11</strong>0 William Street - <strong>26</strong>" Floor<br />
New York, New York 10038<br />
SO ORDERED,<br />
AHMUTY, DEMERS & McMANUS<br />
- - -?2mrneys fa D M a - __ -<br />
EX-FM, INC. f/k/a FISCHBACH<br />
& MOORE, INC.,<br />
200 I.U. Willets Road<br />
Albertson, New York <strong>11</strong>50<br />
FILED<br />
(516) 535-5433<br />
--Our File No.: TFZ 000102 FAQpR 2 6 ZO'
NYCAL<br />
I.A.S. Part 30<br />
Hon. Sherry Klein Heitler, J.S.C.<br />
NATHANIEL MURRAY,<br />
Index No.: 190036-2010<br />
-against-<br />
Plaintiffs,<br />
NO OPPOSITION SUMMARY JUDGMENT<br />
MOTION AND ORDER<br />
BONDEX INTERNATIONAL, INC et al. including,<br />
FOSTER WHEELER, LLC,<br />
Defendants.<br />
WHEREFORE, defendant FOSTER WHEELER, LLC hereby request summary judgment in the<br />
above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212, dismissing plaintiffs'<br />
complaint against defendant FOSTER WHEELER, LLC with prejudice, and there being no opposition<br />
thereto,<br />
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against defendant<br />
FOSTER WHEELER, LLC be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and without costs.<br />
New York, New York 10036<br />
Stephen Novakidis, Esq.<br />
Sedgwick, Detert, Moran & Arnold, UP<br />
Attorneys for Foster Wheeler, LLC<br />
ee Gateway CentV21 F t<br />
Newark, NJ 07102<br />
E 0<br />
SO ORDERED,<br />
NJh77254vl
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK<br />
COUNTY OF NEW YORK<br />
IN RE: NEW YORK COUNTY / NYCAL<br />
ASBESTOS LITIGATION i I.A.S. Part 30<br />
i (Heitler, J.)<br />
THIS DOCUMENT REFERS TO:<br />
j Index No.: 190052/10<br />
HILLIARD YOUNG AND SHIRLEY YOUNG,<br />
-against-<br />
Plaintiffs,<br />
ANCHOR PACKING COMPANY, et al.,<br />
i NO OPPOSITION<br />
! SUMMARY JUDGMENT<br />
; MOTION AND OFtDER<br />
Defendants.<br />
WHEREFORE, defendant, Kentile Floors, Inc., hereby requests summary judgment in<br />
the above entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules 6 3212, dismissing plaintiffs'<br />
complaint against defendant, Kentile Floors, Inc., with prejudice in this action, and there being<br />
no opposition thereto,<br />
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against<br />
defendant, Kentile Floors, Inc., be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and without<br />
costs.<br />
Dated: New York, New York<br />
dPPIl- ,20<strong>11</strong><br />
Carol Tempesta, Esq. '<br />
Attorney for Defendant<br />
Kentile Floors, Inc.<br />
Hilliard Young and Shirley Young<br />
MCGIVNEY & KLUGER, P.C.<br />
WEITZ & LUXENBERG, P.C. A p 2 ~ 6<br />
80 Broad Street-Suite 2300<br />
700 Broadway<br />
New York, New York 100<strong>04</strong><br />
New York, New York 10003<br />
(212) 509-3456 (212) 558-5500<br />
r,(3W ( I(<br />
209<br />
SO ORDERED,<br />
2082-8993<br />
NO0 17365-2
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK<br />
COUNTY OF NEW YORK<br />
IN RE NEW YORK CITY ASBESTOS LITIGATION NYCAL<br />
Hon, Sherry Klein Heitler<br />
CARLOS E. SIMMONS,<br />
X<br />
X<br />
Index No. 190062-2010<br />
-against-<br />
Plaintiff (s),<br />
NO OPPOSITION<br />
SUMMARY JUDGMENT MOTION AND<br />
ORDER<br />
A.O. SMITH WATER PRODUCTS, INC. et al,, including<br />
FOSTER WHEELER, LLC,<br />
Defendants.<br />
X<br />
WHEREFORE, defendant FOSTER WHEELER, LLC hereby requests summary judgment in the<br />
above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212, dismissing plaintiffs'<br />
complaint against defendant FOSTER WHEELER, LLC with prejudice, and there being no opposition<br />
thereto,<br />
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against defendant<br />
FOSTER WHEELER, LLC be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and without costs.<br />
Dated:<br />
New York, New York<br />
Joseph& Belluck, Esq.<br />
Belluc Fox, LLP<br />
Attorneys for Plaintflfs<br />
546 Fifth Avenue, qfh Floor<br />
New York, NY 10036<br />
Stephen hal6dis, Esq.<br />
Sedgwick, Detert, Mora@& flmpld,<br />
Attorneys for Foster W$@/er$ L&<br />
Three Gateway Center, 12fh Floor<br />
Newark, NJ 07102<br />
i:;h<br />
SO ORDERED,<br />
Hon. Sherry Klweitler, J.S.C.
<strong>04</strong>/08/20<strong>11</strong> 15:14 FAX<br />
212 986 2255<br />
EARLY STRAUSS<br />
0 002/002<br />
I<br />
/<br />
-against-<br />
I<br />
WHEREFOHF,, Dcfondent F1X)WSERVE CORPORATION SUCCESSOR IN INTEREST TO<br />
DURAMETntlJC CORPORATION, incomdy sued 8.9 "PLOWSERVE US, INC. (individually<br />
opposition thcrora,<br />
I<br />
ORDEFWD, that upon norice tn all co-dcfmdnstrs, all claims a d<br />
cr0.u~ claim against OcI'mdanr<br />
I)wamelallic be and the mnu arc hmby dismiosed with ptajudiec nnrl withaui coats to ciiher parry<br />
Dated: New Yotk, New York<br />
----I.-_.
COUNTY OF NEW YORK<br />
IN RE NEW YORK CITY ASBESTOS LlTlGATJON NYCAL<br />
I.A.S. Part 30<br />
(Heitler, J.)<br />
FRANK X. HELSTAB AND<br />
MELINDA J. HELSTAB,<br />
-against-<br />
AETNA HEALTH, INC., et. at.<br />
-<br />
Plaintiffs,<br />
X<br />
X<br />
IndexNo. 190157/10<br />
NO OPPOSITION<br />
SUMMARY JUDGMENT MOTION<br />
AND ORDER<br />
- - - ..<br />
_. __<br />
Defendants.<br />
X<br />
WHEREFORE, defendant AETNA HEALTH INC. (Individually and as a Successor to ONE LIBERTY<br />
PLAZA HOLDINGS, INC.), erroneously sued as Successor to ONE LIBERTY PLAZA HOLDINGS, INC.,<br />
(”AETNA HEALTH”), and AETNA INC. (Individually and as a Successor to NYL CARE HEALTH PLANS, INC.<br />
and ONE LIBERTY PLAZA HOLDINGS INC.) erroneously sued as Successor to NYL CARE HEALTH PLANS,<br />
INC. AND ONE LIBERTY PLAZA HOLDINGS, INC. ,(“AETNA INC.”) (collectively and hereinafter “AETNA”)<br />
hereby request summary judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 32 12,<br />
dismissing plaintiffs’ complaint against defendant AETNA with prejudice, and there being no opposition thereto,<br />
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against defendant AETNA be<br />
and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and without costs.<br />
Dated:<br />
New York. New York<br />
Attorneys for Plaintiffs<br />
SEDGWICK, DETER, MORXN &-ARNOLD,<br />
LLC<br />
Attorneys for Aetna<br />
Three Gateway Center, 1 Zth Floor<br />
360 Lexington Avenue, 20th Floor APR 2 6 20”<br />
New York, NY 10017
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK<br />
COUNTY OF NEW YORK<br />
IN FtE: NEW YORK COUNTY<br />
j NYCAL<br />
ASBESTOS LITIGATION<br />
j I.A.S. Part 30<br />
! (Heitler, J.)<br />
THIS DOCUMENT REFERS TO:<br />
i Index No.: 190166/10<br />
LOUIS DIGILIO,<br />
-against-<br />
A. C. & S., INC., et al.,<br />
Plaintiffs,<br />
Defendants.<br />
j NO OPPOSITION<br />
j SUMMARY JUDGMENT<br />
j MOTION AND ORDER<br />
i<br />
WHEREFORE, defendant, Treadwell Corporation, hereby requests summary judgment in<br />
the above entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules 9 3212, dismissing plaintiffs'<br />
complaint against defendant, Treadwell Corporation, with prejudice in this action, and there<br />
being no opposition thereto,<br />
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against<br />
defendant, Treadwell Corporation, be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and<br />
without costs.<br />
Attorney for Defendant<br />
Treadwell Corporation<br />
MCGIVNEY & KLUGER, P.C.<br />
80 Broad Street-Suite 2300<br />
New Y ork, New Y ork 100<strong>04</strong><br />
(212) 509-3456<br />
I L E D<br />
Louis Digilio<br />
Weitz&Luxenberg,~.~.F<br />
700 Broadway<br />
New Y ork, New Y ork 10003<br />
(212) 558-5500 APR 2 6 20<strong>11</strong><br />
N0038955-1
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK<br />
COUNTY OF NEW YORK<br />
IN RE: NEW YORK COUNTY i NYCAL<br />
ASBESTOS LITIGATION<br />
THIS DOCUMENT REFERS TO:<br />
LOUIS DIGILIO,<br />
i I.A.S. Part 30<br />
i (Heitler, J.)<br />
j Index No.: 190166/10<br />
-against-<br />
A. C. & S., INC., et al.,<br />
Plaintiffs,<br />
: NO OPPOSITION<br />
SUMMARY JUDGMENT<br />
i MOTION AND ORDER<br />
Defendants. i<br />
WHEREFORE, defendant, Flowserve Corporation fMa The Duriron Company, Inc.,<br />
hereby requests summary judgment in the above entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law<br />
C..<br />
I<br />
and Rules 8 3212, dismissing plaintiffs’ complaint against defendant, Flowserve Corporation<br />
fMa The Duriron Company, Inc., with prejudice in this action, and there being no opposition<br />
thereto,<br />
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against<br />
defendant, Flowserve Corporation fMa The Duriron Company, Inc., be and the same are hereby<br />
dismissed with prejudice and without costs.<br />
Attorney for Defendant<br />
Flowserve Corporation<br />
MCGIVNEY & KLUGER, P.C.<br />
80 Broad Street-Suite 2300<br />
New York, New York 100<strong>04</strong><br />
(212) 509-3456<br />
SO ORDERED,<br />
N0038955-1<br />
9Attorney Louis Digilio for Plaintiffs FILED<br />
*..a<br />
Weitz & Luxenberg, P.C.<br />
700 Broadway<br />
NewYork,NewYork10003 APR 2 6 201’<br />
NEW YORK<br />
CLERKS OFFICE<br />
co,,Nn<br />
951-0882<br />
APR 152Otl1
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK<br />
COUNTY OF NEW YORK<br />
IN RE: NEW YORK COUNTY<br />
! NYCAL<br />
ASBESTOS LITIGATION<br />
j I.A.S. Part 30<br />
i (Heitler, J.)<br />
THIS DOCUMENT REFERS TO:<br />
j Index No.: 190166/10<br />
LOUIS DIGILIO,<br />
A. C. & S., INC., et al.,<br />
Plaintiffs, i NO OPPOSITION<br />
i SUMMARY JUDGMENT<br />
-against- [ MOTION AND ORDER<br />
Defendants.<br />
WHEREFORE, defendant, Courter & Company, Inc., hereby requests<br />
judgment in the above entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules 6 3212, I<br />
summary<br />
ismissing<br />
plaintiffs’ complaint against defendant, Courter & Company, Inc., with prejudice in this action,<br />
and there being no opposition thereto,<br />
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against<br />
defendant, Courter & Company, Inc., be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and<br />
without costs,<br />
Louis Digilio<br />
MCGIVNEY & KLUGER, P.C.<br />
Weitz & Luxenberg, P.C.<br />
80 Broad Street-Suite 2300<br />
700 Broadway<br />
New York, New York 100<strong>04</strong><br />
(212) 509-3456 (212) 558-5500<br />
New York, New York IoOOF 1 L E D<br />
N0038955-1<br />
<strong>11</strong>22-23705
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK<br />
COUNTY OF NEW YON<br />
IN RE: NEW YORK COUNTY<br />
! NYCAL<br />
ASBESTOS LITIGATION<br />
j I.A.S. Part 30<br />
j (Heitler, J.)<br />
THIS DOCUMENT REFERS TO:<br />
j Index No.: 190166/10<br />
LOUIS DIGILIO,<br />
-against-<br />
A. C. & S., INC., et al.,<br />
Plaintiffs,<br />
i NO OPPOSITION<br />
! SUMMARY JUDGMENT<br />
i MOTION AND ORDER<br />
Defendants. !<br />
WHEREFORE, defendant, The Fairbanks Company, hereby requests summary judgment<br />
in the above entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules 0 3212, dismissing<br />
plaintiffs' complaint against defendant, The Fairbanks Company, with prejudice in this action,<br />
and there being no opposition thereto,<br />
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against<br />
defendant, The Fairbanks Company, be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and<br />
without costs.<br />
-- "<br />
Okwedeo N. Okoh, Esq.<br />
Attorney for Defendant<br />
The Fairbanks Company<br />
MCGIVNEY & KLUGER, P.C.<br />
80 Broad Street-Suite 2300<br />
New York, New York 100<strong>04</strong><br />
(212) 509-3456<br />
1<br />
Attorney for Plaintiffs<br />
Louis Digilio<br />
Weitz & Luxenberg, P.C.<br />
700 Broadway<br />
New York, New York 1000<br />
(212) 558-5500<br />
F\LE"<br />
SO ORDERED,<br />
Hon. She&<br />
5<strong>04</strong>-0621<br />
N0038955-1<br />
APR 15 20<strong>11</strong>
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK<br />
COUNTY OF NEW YORK<br />
IN RE: NEW YORK COUNTY / NYCAL<br />
ASBESTOS LITIGATION<br />
j I.A.S. Part 30<br />
j (Heitler, J.)<br />
THIS DOCUMENT REFERS TO:<br />
j Index No.: 190166/10<br />
LOUIS DIGILIO,<br />
Plaintiffs, i NO OPPOSITION<br />
! SUMMARY JUDGMENT<br />
-against- j MOTION AND ORDER<br />
A. C. & S., INC., et al., I<br />
Defendants. !<br />
WHEREFORE, defendant, Kentile Floors, Inc., hereby requests summary judgment in<br />
the above entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules 6 3212, dismissing plaintiffs'<br />
complaint against defendant, Kentile Floors, Inc., with prejudice in this action, and there being<br />
no opposition thereto,<br />
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against<br />
defendant, Kentile Floors, Inc., be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and without<br />
costs.<br />
Dated: New York, New York<br />
4<strong>11</strong> ,20<strong>11</strong><br />
Carol M. Tempesta, Esq.<br />
Attorney for Defendant<br />
Kentile Floors, Inc.<br />
MCGIVNEY & KLUGER, P.C.<br />
80 Broad Street-Suite 2300<br />
New York, New York 100<strong>04</strong><br />
(212) 509-3456<br />
Attorney for Plaintiffs<br />
Louis Digilio<br />
Weitz & Luxenberg, P.C.<br />
700 Broadway<br />
New York, New York 10003<br />
(212) 558-5500<br />
SO ORDERED,<br />
N0038955-1<br />
2082-9449<br />
APR 1520<strong>11</strong> - a<br />
59aV
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK<br />
ALL COUNTIES WITHIN NEW YORK CITY<br />
X<br />
IN RE: NEW YORK COUNTY I.A.S. Part 30<br />
ASBESTOS LITIGATION<br />
(Judge Heitler)<br />
X<br />
This Document Relates to:<br />
Index No.:190182/10<br />
Richard W. Duquette and Doris H.<br />
Duquet te ,<br />
Plaintiffs,<br />
- against - NO OPPOSITION<br />
SUMMARY JUDGMENT<br />
A.W. Chesterton Co., et al.,<br />
MOTION AND ORDER<br />
_________________I_--------<br />
NYCAL<br />
requests summary judgment in the above-entitled case,<br />
pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 83212,<br />
dismissing plaintiffs' Complaint against defendant Goulds<br />
Pumps Inc., with prejudice, and there being no opposition<br />
thereto,<br />
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, a<strong>11</strong><br />
claims and cross claims against defendant Goulds Pumps<br />
Inc., be dismissed with prejudice and without costs<br />
I<br />
I<br />
d<br />
Cullen and Dykman LLP<br />
Attorneys for Plaintiffs<br />
Richard W. Duquette and Doris Goulds Pumps Inc.<br />
H. Duquette 177 Montague Street<br />
360 Lexington Ave, lyn, New York <strong>11</strong>201<br />
New York, NY 10017<br />
le No.: 6754-<strong>11</strong>018<br />
So Ordered:<br />
/
NYCAL<br />
I.A.S. Part 30<br />
Hon. Sherry Klein Heitler, J.S.C.<br />
ALEJANDRO BAUTISTA,<br />
Index No.: 190197-2010<br />
-against-<br />
AMERICAN STANDARD et al. including,<br />
GENERAL ELECTRIC COMPANY,<br />
Plaintiffs,<br />
NO OPPOSITION SUMMARY JUDGMENT<br />
MOTION AND ORDER<br />
Defendants.<br />
WHEREFORE, defendant GENERAL ELECTRIC COMPANY hereby request summary judgment in<br />
the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212, dismissing plaintiffs'<br />
complaint against defendant GENERAL ELECTRIC COMPANY with prejudice, and there being no<br />
opposition thereto,<br />
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against defendant<br />
GENERAL ELECTRIC COMPANY be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and without costs.<br />
Stephen Novakidis, Esq.<br />
-ẇ2e-<br />
Sedgwick, Detert, Moran & Arnold, LLP<br />
Attorney for Pluintqfs<br />
Attorneys for General Electric Company<br />
546 Fifth Avenue, 4'h Floor<br />
Three Gateway Center, 12fh Floor<br />
New York, New York 10036 Newark,NJ07102 I<br />
SO ORDERED,<br />
Hon. Sherry KW Heitler<br />
NJI43273Yvl
I<br />
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK<br />
COUNTY OF NEW YORK<br />
IN RE: NEW YORK COUNTY<br />
! NYCAL<br />
ASBESTOS LITIGATION<br />
j I.A.S. Part 30<br />
/ (Heitler, J.)<br />
THIS DOCUMENT REFERS TO:<br />
j Index No.: 1902<strong>26</strong>/10<br />
WILHELM PRANGE AND ROSEMARY<br />
PRANGE,<br />
i NO OPPOSITION<br />
Plaintiffs, i SUMMARY JUDGMENT<br />
j MOTION AND ORDER<br />
-against-<br />
A. C. & S., INC., et al.,<br />
Defendants.<br />
j<br />
WHEREFORE, defendant, Patterson Pump Co., hereby requests summary judgment in<br />
the above entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules 5 3212, dismissing plaintiffs’<br />
complaint against defendant, Patterson Pump Co., with prejudice in this action, and there being<br />
no opposition thereto,<br />
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against<br />
defendant, Patterson Pump Co., be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and without<br />
costs.<br />
Dated: New York, New York<br />
Patterson Pump Co.<br />
MCGIVNEY & KLUGER, P.C.<br />
Weitz & Luxenberg, P.C.<br />
80 Broad Street-Suite 2300<br />
700 Broadway<br />
New York, New York 100<strong>04</strong><br />
New York, New York 10003<br />
(2 12) 509-3456 (212) 558-5500<br />
SO ORDERED,<br />
NO0389551<br />
454-1 1948<br />
0
NYCAL<br />
I.A.S. Part 30<br />
Won. Sherry Klein Heitler, J.S.C.<br />
WILHELM PFUNGE and ROSEMARY PFUNGE,<br />
Index No.: 1902<strong>26</strong>-2010<br />
-against-<br />
Plaintiff,<br />
NO OPPOSITION<br />
SUMMARY JUDGMENT MOTION<br />
AND ORDER<br />
ANCHOR PACKING COMPANY, et al., including<br />
JOHNSON & TOWERS, INC.,<br />
Defendants.<br />
WHEREFORE, defendant JOHNSON & TOWERS, INC. hereby request summary judgment in<br />
the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212, dismissing plaintiffs<br />
complaint against defendant JOHNSON & TOWERS, WC. with prejudice, and there being no<br />
opposition thereto,<br />
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against defendant<br />
JOHNSON & TOWERS, INC. be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and without costs.<br />
Dated:<br />
New York New York<br />
Attorneys for Pluintfls<br />
700 Broadway<br />
New York, New York 10003<br />
(212) 558-5500 n (973) 242-0002<br />
Attorneys for Johnson & Towers, Inc.<br />
Three Gateway Center, 12fh Floor<br />
Newark, NJ 071 02<br />
SO ORDERED,<br />
Hon. Sherry Klein H>tler, Hztler, J.S.C.<br />
NJl433724v1<br />
15 20<strong>11</strong><br />
AF'R 2 6 20<strong>11</strong><br />
NEW YORK<br />
SOUIW*Y CLERK'S OFFICE
TMc:CCCjpk)<br />
3128<strong>11</strong> 1<br />
WHEREFORE, defendant Consolidated Edison Company of New York, Inc.<br />
hereby requests summary judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law<br />
and Rules Section 3212, dismissing plaintiffs complaint against defendant Consolidated Edison<br />
Company of New York, Inc. with prejudice, and there being no opposition thereto,<br />
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross-claims<br />
against defendant Consolidated Edison Company of New York, Inc., be and the same are hereby<br />
dismissed with prejudice and without costs.<br />
Dated: New York, New York<br />
Attorneys for Plaintiff<br />
700 Broadway<br />
New York, NY 100035<br />
on Company of New<br />
York, Inc.<br />
4 Irving Place<br />
w York, NY p Or3t8 E D<br />
SO ORDERED: *PR 2 6 20<strong>11</strong><br />
Our File No<br />
S-4 12 1-1 0
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK<br />
COUNTY’ OF NEW YORK<br />
In Re: NEW YORK CITYASBESTOS LITIGATION<br />
Index No.: 10/190243<br />
ALPHONSE MAGLIO,<br />
- against -<br />
Plaintiff( s),<br />
NO OPPOSITION<br />
SUMMARY JUDGMENT<br />
MOTION<br />
AC and S, INC., (ARMSGTRONG<br />
CONTRACTING & SUPPLY) et al.,<br />
Defendants.<br />
WHEIREFORE, Defendant WEIL-MCLAIN COMPANY, INC., hereinafter (‘WEIL-<br />
MCLAN’) hereby requests Summary Judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil<br />
Practice Law and Rules Section 3212, dismissing plaintiff’s complaint against Defendant Weil-<br />
McLain with prejudice, and there being no opposition thereto,<br />
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against<br />
Defendant, Weil-McLain be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and without costs<br />
to either party.<br />
Dated: q/q ,20<strong>11</strong><br />
/<br />
i(* Jennifer L. Budner, Esq<br />
WEITZ & LUXENBERG, P.C.<br />
SEGAL McCAMBRIDGE<br />
Attorneys for Plaintiff<br />
SINGER & MAHONEY, LTD.<br />
700 Broadway Attorneys for Defendant<br />
New York, NY 10003<br />
(212) 558-5500<br />
Weil-McLain<br />
850 Third Avenue, Suite <strong>11</strong>00<br />
New York, NY 10022<br />
F I L E p<br />
SO ORDERED,<br />
APR 2 6 20<strong>11</strong><br />
NEi& YORK<br />
WUNTY CLERK’S
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK<br />
COUNTY OF NEW YORK<br />
IN RE: NEW YORK COUNTY<br />
NYCAL<br />
ASBESTOS LITIGATION<br />
I.A.S, Part 30<br />
(Heitler, J.)<br />
THIS DOCUMENT REFERS TO:<br />
Index No.: 190243/10<br />
ALPHONSE MAGLIO,<br />
-against-<br />
A. C. & S., INC., et al.,<br />
Plaintiffs,<br />
Defendants.<br />
NO OPPOSITION<br />
SUMMARY JUDGMENT<br />
MOTION AND ORDER<br />
WHEREFORE, defendant, Oakfabco, Inc., hereby requests summary judgment in the<br />
above entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules 6 3212, dismissing plaintiffs'<br />
complaint against defendant, Oakfabco, Inc., with prejudice in this action, and there being no<br />
opposition thereto,<br />
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against<br />
defendant, Oakfabco, Inc., be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and without<br />
costs,<br />
Dated: New Y,ork, New York<br />
Robert Da&h, Esq.<br />
Attorney for Defendant<br />
Oakfabco, Inc.<br />
Alphonse Maglio<br />
MCGIVNEY & KLUGER, P.C.<br />
Weitz & Luxenberg, P.C.<br />
80 Broad Street-Suite 2300<br />
700 Broadway<br />
New York, New York 100<strong>04</strong><br />
New Y ork, New Y ork 10003<br />
(212) 509-3456 (212) 558-5500<br />
FILED<br />
APR 2 6 20<strong>11</strong><br />
SO ORDERED,<br />
Hon. Sherry Klein Heitler<br />
2571 -0033<br />
NEW YORK<br />
CLERK'S OFFICE'<br />
N0038955-1
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK<br />
COUNTY OF NEW YON<br />
IN RE: NEW YORK COUNTY<br />
j NYCAL<br />
ASBESTOS LITIGATION<br />
j I.A.S. Part 30<br />
j (Heitler, J.)<br />
THIS DOCUMENT REFERS TO:<br />
j Index No,: 190243/10<br />
ALPHONSE MAGLIO,<br />
A. C. & S., TNC., et al.,<br />
Plaintiffs, i NO OPPOSITION<br />
! SUMMARY JUDGMENT<br />
-against- j MOTION AND ORDER<br />
Defendants.<br />
WHEREFORE, defendant, Columbia Boiler, hereby requests summary judgment in the<br />
I<br />
above entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules 8 3212, dismissing plaintiffs'<br />
complaint against defendant, Columbia Boiler, with prejudice in this action, and there being no<br />
opposition thereto,<br />
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against<br />
defendant, Columbia Boiler, be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and without<br />
costs.<br />
,201 1<br />
chd% H- k5USWl'E4t.<br />
Carol M. Ternpesta, Esq.<br />
Attorney for Defendant<br />
Attorney for Plaintiffs<br />
Columbia Boiler<br />
Alphonse Maglio<br />
MCGIVNEY & KLUGER, P.C.<br />
Weitz & Luxenberg, P.C.<br />
SO Broad Street-Suite 2300<br />
700 Broadway<br />
New York, New York 100<strong>04</strong><br />
New York, New York 10<br />
(2 12) 509-3456 (212) 558-5500<br />
SO ORDERED,<br />
Hon. Sherry Klein'Heitler<br />
APR 2 6 201'<br />
NEW YORK<br />
2SedbNm CLERK'S OFF-<br />
N0038955-1<br />
APR 15 20<strong>11</strong>
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YON<br />
COUNTY OF NEW YORK<br />
IN RE: NEW YORK COUNTY<br />
j NYCAL<br />
ASBESTOS LITIGATION<br />
j I.A.S. Part 30<br />
j (Heitler, J.)<br />
THIS DOCUMENT REFERS TO:<br />
j Index No.: 190243/10<br />
ALPHONSE MAGLIO,<br />
A. C. & S,, INC., et al.,<br />
Plaintiffs , ; NO OPPOSITION<br />
! SUMMARY JUDGMENT<br />
-against- j MOTION AND ORDER<br />
Defendants.<br />
WHEREFORE, defendant, Kentile Floors, Inc., hereby requests summary judgment in<br />
the above entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules 8 3212, dismissing plaintiffs’<br />
complaint against defendant, Kentile Floors, Inc., with prejudice in this action, and there being<br />
no opposition thereto,<br />
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against<br />
defendant, Kentile Floors, Inc., be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and without<br />
costs.<br />
Dated: New York, New York<br />
&a<br />
,20<strong>11</strong><br />
Carol M. Tempesta, Esq.<br />
Attorney for Defendant<br />
Kentile Floors, Inc.<br />
MCGIVNEY & KLUGER, P.C.<br />
80 Broad Street-Suite 2300<br />
New York, New York 100<strong>04</strong><br />
(212) 509-3456<br />
Attorney for Plaintiffs<br />
Alphonse Maglio<br />
Weitz & Luxenberg, P.C.<br />
700 Broadway<br />
New York, New York 10003 FILED<br />
(212) 558-5500<br />
APR 2 6 20<strong>11</strong><br />
SO ORDERED,<br />
N0038955-1<br />
Hon. Sherry Klein Heitler<br />
NEW YORK<br />
COU~ CLERKS OFF-]<br />
2082-9579
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK<br />
COUNTY OF NEW YORK<br />
IN RE: NEW YORK COUNTY / NYCAL<br />
ASBESTOS LITIGATION : I.A.S. Part 30<br />
i (Heitler, J.)<br />
THIS DOCUMENT REFERS TO:<br />
j Index No.: 190243/10<br />
ALPHONSE MAGLIO,<br />
-against-<br />
A. C. & S., INC., et al.,<br />
Plaintiffs, \ NO OPPOSITION<br />
SUMMARY JUDGMENT<br />
i MOTION AND ORDER<br />
Defendants.<br />
j<br />
WHEREFORE, defendant, National Boiler Works, Inc., hereby requests summary<br />
judgment in the above entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules 0 3212, dismissing<br />
plaintiffs’ complaint against defendant, National Boiler Works, Inc., with prejudice in this<br />
action, and there being no opposition thereto,<br />
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against<br />
defendant, National Boiler Works, Inc., be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and<br />
without costs.<br />
Dated: New,York, New York<br />
Mattyie‘w w T. Fair1 422+<br />
Attorney for Defendant<br />
Attorney for Plaintiffs<br />
National Boiler Works, Inc.<br />
Alphonse Maglio<br />
MCGIVNEY & KLUGER, P.C.<br />
Weitz & Luxenberg, P.C.<br />
80 Broad Street-Suite 2300<br />
700 Broadway<br />
New York, New York 100<strong>04</strong><br />
New York, New York 10003 FILED<br />
(212) 509-3456 (212) 558-5500<br />
fi<br />
SO ORDERED,<br />
Hon. Sherry Klein Heitler<br />
1801-27<br />
N0038955-1<br />
APR 2 6 201’
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK<br />
COUNTY OF NEW YORK<br />
IN RE: NEW YORK COUNTY<br />
/ NYCAL<br />
ASBESTOS LITIGATION<br />
i I.A.S. Part 30<br />
i (Heitler, J.)<br />
THIS DOCUMENT REFERS TO:<br />
j Index No.: 190243/10<br />
ALPHONSE MAGLIO,<br />
A. C. & S., INC., et al.,<br />
Plaintiffs, i NO OPPOSITION<br />
! SUMMARY JUDGMENT<br />
-against- j MOTION AND ORDER<br />
Defendants.<br />
WHEREFORE, defendant, Courter & Company, Inc., hereby requests<br />
judgment in the above entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules (j 3212, ismissing<br />
plaintiffs’ complaint against defendant, Courter & Company, Inc., with prejudice in this action,<br />
and there being no opposition thereto,<br />
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against<br />
defendant, Courter & Company, Inc., be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and<br />
without costs.<br />
Courter & Codphny, Inc.<br />
Alphonse Maglio<br />
MCGIVNEY & KLUGER, P.C.<br />
Weitz & Luxenberg, P.C.<br />
SO Broad Street-Suite 2300<br />
700 Broadway<br />
New York, New York 100<strong>04</strong><br />
New York, New York 100<br />
(212) 509-3456 (212) 558-5500<br />
SO ORDERED, 2k.V<br />
w-<br />
Hon. Sherry Klein Heitler<br />
-<br />
<strong>11</strong>22-1277<br />
N0038955-1
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK<br />
COUNTY OF NEW YORK<br />
IN RE: NEW YORK COUNTY<br />
NYCAL<br />
ASBESTOS LITIGATION<br />
LA.% Part 30<br />
(Heitler, J.)<br />
THIS DOCUMENT REFERS TO:<br />
Index No.: 190243/10<br />
ALPHONSE MAGLIO,<br />
-against-<br />
A. C. & S., INC., et al.,<br />
Plaintiffs,<br />
Defendants.<br />
NO OPPOSITION<br />
SUMMARY JUDGMENT<br />
MOTION AND ORDER<br />
WHEREFORE, defendant, Aurora Pump Company, hereby requests summary judgment<br />
in the above entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules § 3212, dismissing<br />
plaintiffs’ complaint against defendant, Aurora Pump Company, with prejudice in this action,<br />
and there being no opposition thereto,<br />
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against<br />
defendant, Aurora Pump Company, be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and<br />
without costs +<br />
Dated: New Y k, New York<br />
4p ,20<strong>11</strong><br />
Attorney for Defendant<br />
Attorney for Plaintiffs<br />
Aurora Pump Company<br />
Alphonse Maglio<br />
MCGIVNEY & KLUGER, P.C.<br />
Weitz & Luxenberg, P.C.<br />
80 Broad Street-Suite 2300<br />
700 Broadway<br />
New York, New York 100<strong>04</strong><br />
New York, New York 10003<br />
(212) 509-3456 (212) 558-5500<br />
ApR 2 6 2O’<br />
SO ORDERED,<br />
1003-03&~<br />
N0038955-1
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YON<br />
COUNTY OF NEW YORK<br />
IN RE? NEW YORK COUNTY<br />
! NYCAL<br />
ASBESTOS LITIGATION<br />
i I.A.S. Part 30<br />
(Heitler, J.)<br />
THIS DOCUMENT REFERS TO:<br />
/ Index No.: 190243/10<br />
ALPHONSE MAGLIO,<br />
-against-<br />
A. C. & S,, INC., et al.,<br />
Plaintiffs,<br />
i NO OPPOSITION<br />
j SUMMARY JUDGMENT<br />
i MOTION AND ORDER<br />
Defendants. [<br />
WHEREFORE, defendant, The Fairbanks Company, hereby requests summary judgment<br />
in the above entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules 0 3212, dismissing<br />
plaintiffs' complaint against defendant, The Fairbanks Company, with prejudice in this action,<br />
and there being no opposition thereto,<br />
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against<br />
defendant, The Fairbanks Company, be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and<br />
without costs.<br />
Dated: New York, New York<br />
Attorney for Defendant<br />
Attorney for Plaintiffs<br />
The Fairbanks Company<br />
Alphonse Maglio<br />
MCGIVNEY & KLUGER, P.C.<br />
Weitz & Luxenberg, P.C.<br />
80 Broad Street-Suite 2300<br />
700 Broadway<br />
New York, New York 100<strong>04</strong><br />
New York, New York 10003<br />
(212) 509-3456 (212) 558-5500<br />
/-3<br />
\<br />
SO ORDERED,<br />
Hon. Sherry klein Heitler<br />
5<strong>04</strong>-0633<br />
FILED<br />
APR 2 6 20<strong>11</strong><br />
NFLV YORK<br />
W T Y CLERK'S OFFICE]<br />
N0038955-1<br />
APR 15 20<strong>11</strong>
A.O. SMITHE WATER PRODUCTS CO.,<br />
Defendants.<br />
d., '<br />
: Hon. Sherry Klein Heitler.<br />
: IAS Part 30<br />
WHEREFORE, defendants The Goodyear Tire & Rubber Company and Goodyear<br />
Canada Inc. hereby request summary judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to<br />
CPLR 3212, dismissing plaintiff's complaint against The Goodyear Tire & Rubber<br />
Company and Goodyear Canada Inc. with prejudice, and there being no opposition<br />
thereto, it is hereby:<br />
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims<br />
against The Goodyear Tire & Rubber Company and Goodyear Canada Inc. be and the<br />
same are<br />
+<br />
hereby dismissed with prejudice and without costs.<br />
Dated: New York, New York<br />
WEITZ & LUXENBERG, P.C. LYNCH DASKAL EMERY LLP<br />
Attorneys for Plaintiff<br />
Attorneys for Defendants T<br />
By:<br />
David Chandler<br />
700 Broadway<br />
New York, New York 10003<br />
(212) 558-5500 (212) 302-2400<br />
Lawrence G. Lee<br />
<strong>26</strong>4 West 40' Street FILED<br />
- -<br />
New York. New York 100 18<br />
APR 2 6 2 6<br />
Dated: New York, New York<br />
NEW YORK<br />
COUNTY CLERKS OFFICE'<br />
$0 ORDERED:<br />
Hon. Sherry Klein Heitler, J.S.C.
Plaintiff,<br />
-against-<br />
A.O. SMITHE WATER PRODUCTS CO.,<br />
Defendants.<br />
: NO OPPOSITION<br />
: SUMMARY JUDGMENT<br />
: MOTION AND ORDER<br />
A,, : Hon. Sherry Klein Heitler,<br />
1 IAS Part 30<br />
WHEREFORE, defendant Georgia-Pacific LLC hereby request summary<br />
judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to CPLR 3212, dismissing plaintiffs'<br />
complaint against Georgia-Pacific LLC with prejudice, and there being no opposition<br />
thereto, it is hereby:<br />
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims<br />
against Georgia-Pacific LLC be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and<br />
without costs.<br />
WEITZ & LUXENBERG, P.C.<br />
Attorneys for Plaintiff<br />
LYNCH DASKAL EMERY LLP<br />
By:<br />
700 Broadway<br />
<strong>26</strong>4 West 40' Street<br />
New York. New York 10003 New York. New York 10018<br />
(212) 558-5500 (212) 302-2400
~ Index<br />
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK<br />
COUNTY OF NEW YORK<br />
IN RE: NEW YORK COUNTY i NYCAL<br />
ASBESTOS LITIGATION j I.A.S. Part 30<br />
i (Heitler, J.)<br />
THIS DOCUMENT REFERS TO:<br />
EDWARD SCHMID AND CARISTINE<br />
SCHMID,<br />
-against-<br />
A. C. & S., INC., et ul.,<br />
Plaintiffs,<br />
No.: 190250/10<br />
NO OPPOSITION<br />
SUMMARY JUDGMENT<br />
MOTION AND ORDER<br />
Defendants.<br />
j<br />
WHEREFORE, defendant, Oakfabco, Inc., hereby requests summary judgment in the<br />
above entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules 9 3212, dismissing plaintiffs’<br />
complaint against defendant, Oakfabco, Inc., with prejudice in this action, and there being no<br />
opposition thereto,<br />
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against<br />
defendant, Oakfabco, Inc., be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and without<br />
costs.<br />
Dated: New York, New York<br />
Robert Darish, Esq.<br />
Attorney for Defendant<br />
Oakfabco, Inc.<br />
MCGIVNEY & KLUGER, P.C.<br />
80 Broad Street-Suite 2300<br />
New York, New York 100<strong>04</strong><br />
+.J<br />
(212) 509-3456 (212) 558-5500<br />
Edward Schrnid and Caristine<br />
Weitz & Luxenberg, P.C.<br />
700 Broadway<br />
New York, New York 10003<br />
20<strong>11</strong><br />
APR 2 6<br />
SO ORDERED,<br />
N0038955-1<br />
Hon. Sherry Klein &itler<br />
2571-0036
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK<br />
COUNTY OF NEW YORK<br />
IN RE: NEW YORK COUNTY<br />
i NYCAL<br />
ASBESTOS LITIGATION<br />
j I.A.S. Part 30<br />
! (Heitler, J.)<br />
THIS DOCUMENT REFERS TO:<br />
j Index No.: 190250/10<br />
EDWARD SCHMID AND CARISTINE<br />
SCHMID,<br />
i NO OPPOSITION<br />
Plaintiffs, j SUMMARY JUDGMENT<br />
-against-<br />
A. C. & S., TNC,, et al.,<br />
Defendants. !<br />
i MOTION AND ORDER<br />
WHEREFORE, defendant, Kentile Floors, Inc., hereby requests summary judgment in<br />
the above entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules 6 3212, dismissing plaintiffs’<br />
complaint against defendant, Kentile Floors, Inc., with prejudice in this action, and there being<br />
no opposition thereto,<br />
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against<br />
defendant, Kentile Floors, Inc., be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and without<br />
costs.<br />
Dated: New York, New York<br />
y/J ,20<strong>11</strong><br />
uw<br />
Carol M. Tempesta, Esq.<br />
C am w. ‘=et*,&-%.<br />
Attorney for Defendant<br />
Attorney for Plaintiffs<br />
Kentile Floors, Inc.<br />
Edward Schmid and Caristine Schmid<br />
MCGIVNEY & KLUGER, P.C.<br />
Weitz 700 Broadway & Luxenberg, P.C. FILED<br />
80 Broad Street-Suite 2300<br />
New York, New York 100<strong>04</strong><br />
New York, New York 10003<br />
(212) 509-3456 (212) 558-5500 APR 2 6 20<strong>11</strong><br />
NEW YOHK<br />
SO ORDERED, . COUNT/ CLERKS OFFICE<br />
Hon. Sherry Klein Heitler<br />
2082-9733<br />
N0038955-1
I<br />
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK<br />
COUNTY OF NEW YORK<br />
' NYCAL<br />
CHRISTINE SCHMTD, as Executrix for the Estate of :<br />
Part 3o<br />
EDWARD F. SCHMID, and CHRISTINE SCHMID, : (Hen. Sherry Klein Heitler)<br />
Individually,<br />
Plaintiff(s),<br />
BURNHAM, LLC., et al.,<br />
-against-<br />
: Index Na. : 190250- 10<br />
: NO-OPPOSITION SUMMARY<br />
JUDGMENT MOTION ANI)<br />
ORDER<br />
Defendants.<br />
________________________________________-------------------------<br />
X<br />
WHEREFORE, defendant CRANE CO., on behalf of named defendants Crane Co. and<br />
Pacific Valves, Individually and as a subsidiary of Crane Co. (hereinafter "CRANE CO."),<br />
I<br />
!<br />
i<br />
j<br />
hereby requests summary judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law<br />
and Rules Section 3212, dismissing plaintiffs' complaint against defendant CRANE CO. with<br />
prejudice, and there being no opposition thereto,<br />
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against<br />
defendant CRANE CO. be, and the same are hereby, dismissed with prejudice and without costs.<br />
(I<br />
!<br />
WEITZ & LUXENB-.~.<br />
Attorneys for Plaintiff(s)<br />
700 Broadway<br />
CRANE CO.<br />
New York, NY 10003<br />
599 Lexington Avenue<br />
(212) 558-5500 w-York, NY 10022<br />
Hon. Sheiry KKn Heitler
~ I.A.S.<br />
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK<br />
COUNTY OF NEW YORK<br />
IN RE:<br />
This Document Relates to:<br />
MICHAEL V. MORENO<br />
NEW YORK CITY<br />
ASBESTOS LITIGATION<br />
against<br />
Part 30<br />
1 (Heitler, J.)<br />
I<br />
INDEX NO.: 190<strong>26</strong>2/10<br />
NO OPPOSITION<br />
SUMMARY JUDGMENT<br />
MOTION AND ORDER<br />
ABEX CORPORATION, ET AL<br />
WHEREFORE, defendant, Johnston Boiler Co., hereby requests summary judgment in<br />
the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212, dismissing<br />
plaintiffs' complaint against defendant, Johnston Boiler Co., with prejudice, and there being no<br />
opposition thereto,<br />
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against<br />
defendant, Johnston Boiler Co., be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and<br />
without costs.<br />
DATED: %Yo&dew York<br />
\ GcL\\<br />
HOAQLAND, LONQO<br />
MORAN. DUNST 8<br />
DOUKAS. LLP<br />
ATTORNEYS AT LAW<br />
NORTH JERSEY<br />
40 PATERSON ST<br />
PO BOX 480<br />
NWBRUNWCK, NJ<br />
SOUTH JERSEY<br />
701 WTSEY'S MILL RD<br />
SUITE 202<br />
HAMMONTON, NJ<br />
HOAGLAND, LONGO, MORAN<br />
DUNST & DOUKAS, LLP<br />
Attorneys for Defendant,<br />
Johnston Boiler Co.<br />
40 Paterson Street - PO Box 480<br />
New Brunswick, New Jersey 08903<br />
SO ORDERED: -<br />
Attor ne ys for Plaint iff (s),<br />
Michael V. Moreno<br />
800 Third Avenue - 13th Floor<br />
New York, NY 10022<br />
SHERRY KLEIN HEITLER
__________----_______________l_f________-------------~-----------~-<br />
X<br />
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK<br />
COUNTY OF NEW YORK<br />
STEVEN GOOD. as Personal Representative for the<br />
Estate of EDWARD T. GOOD,<br />
NYCAL - IAS Part 30<br />
-against-<br />
PI ain t i ffs,<br />
A.O. SMITH WATER PRODUCTS CO., et al,<br />
Defendants.<br />
_____*_r_________f_r_________r__________----------------------------<br />
X<br />
Honorable Sherry Klein Heitler<br />
Index No.: I90<strong>26</strong>3/10<br />
No Opposition Summary<br />
JudPment Motion and Order<br />
WHEREFORE, Defendant SLANT/FIN CORPORATION hereby requests summary<br />
judgment in the above entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212:<br />
dismissing the plaintiffs' Complaint against Defendant SLANT/FIN CORPORATION with<br />
prejudice, and there being no opposition thereto,<br />
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against<br />
Defendant SLANT/FIN CORPORATION, be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice<br />
and without costs.<br />
Dated: New York, New York<br />
Marchgl20<strong>11</strong><br />
1 39h%<br />
Nom J. Golub<br />
WElTZ dL LUXENBERG, P.C.<br />
Marshall Cohway Wright & Bradley, P.C.<br />
Attorneys for Plaintiffs<br />
Attorneys for Defendant Slant/Fin Corporation<br />
700 Broadway<br />
1 16 John Street, qth Floor<br />
New York, New York 10003<br />
New York, New York 10038<br />
(212) 558-5500 (212) 619-4444<br />
FILED
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YOFX<br />
COUNTY OF NEW YORK<br />
TN RE: NEW YORK COUNTY<br />
NYCAL<br />
ASBESTOS LITIGATION<br />
I.A.S. Part 30<br />
(Heitler, J.)<br />
THIS DOCUMENT REFERS TO:<br />
Index No.: 190<strong>26</strong>9/10<br />
GLENN RITZEL,<br />
-against-<br />
A. C. & S., INC., et al.,<br />
Plaintiffs,<br />
Defendants.<br />
NO OPPOSITION<br />
SUMMARY JUDGMENT<br />
MOTION AND ORDER<br />
WHEREFORE, defendant, Kentile Floors, Inc., hereby requests summary judgment in<br />
the above entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules 6 3212, dismissing plaintiffs’<br />
complaint against defendant, Kentile Floors, Inc., with prejudice in this action, and there being<br />
no opposition thereto,<br />
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against<br />
defendant, Kentile Floors, Inc., be and the Same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and without<br />
costs.<br />
Dated: New Y rk, New York<br />
f-7 ,20<strong>11</strong><br />
Carol M. Tempesta, Esq.<br />
Attorney for Defendant<br />
Kentile Floors, Inc.<br />
Glenn Ritzel<br />
McGivNEY & UUGER, P.C.<br />
Weitz & Luxenberg, P.C.<br />
80 Broad Street-Suite 2300<br />
700 Broadway<br />
New York, New Y ork 100<strong>04</strong><br />
New York, New York 10003<br />
(212) 509-3456 (212) 558-5500<br />
SO ORDERED,<br />
2082-9815<br />
N0038955-1<br />
ApFi 1 5 20 <strong>11</strong>
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK<br />
COUNTY OF NEW YORK<br />
IN RE: NEW YORK COUNTY<br />
i NYCAL<br />
ASBESTOS LITIGATION<br />
i 1,A.S. Part 30<br />
[ (Heitler, J.)<br />
THIS DOCUMENT REFERS TO:<br />
I j Index No.: 190<strong>26</strong>9<strong>11</strong>0<br />
GLENN RITZEL,<br />
"against-<br />
A. C. & S., INC., et al.,<br />
Plaintiffs,<br />
i NO OPPOSITION<br />
j SUMMARY JUDGMENT<br />
i MOTION AND ORDER<br />
Defendants. !<br />
WHEREFORE, defendant, The Fairbanks Company, hereby requests summary judgment<br />
in the above entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules 0 3212, dismissing<br />
plaintiffs' complaint against defendant, The Fairbanks Company, with prejudice in this action,<br />
and there being no opposition thereto,<br />
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against<br />
defendant, The Fairbanks Company, be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and<br />
without costs.<br />
Dated: New Yqrk, New York<br />
The Fairbanks Company<br />
MCGIVNEY & KLUGER, P.C.<br />
80 Broad Street-Suite 2300<br />
New York, New York 100<strong>04</strong><br />
(212) 509-3456<br />
n<br />
Glenn Ritzel<br />
Weitz & Luxenberg, P.C.<br />
700 Broadway<br />
New York, New York<br />
(21 2) 558-5500<br />
SO ORDERED, -<br />
Hon. Sherry KleiTHeitler<br />
5<strong>04</strong>-0659<br />
N0038955-1
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK<br />
COUNTY OF NEW YORK<br />
IN RE: NEW YORK COUNTY<br />
NYCAL<br />
ASBESTOS LITIGATION<br />
I.A.S. Part 30<br />
(Heitler, J.)<br />
THIS DOCUMENT REFERS TO:<br />
Index No.: 190270/10<br />
JOSEPH MULLEN,<br />
-against-<br />
A. C. & S., INC., et al.,<br />
Plaintiffs,<br />
Defendants.<br />
NO OPPOSITION<br />
SUMMARY JUDGMENT<br />
MOTION AND ORDER<br />
WHEREFORE, defendant, Treadwell Corporation, hereby requests summary judgment in<br />
the above entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules 6 3212, dismissing plaintiffs'<br />
complaint against defendant, Treadwell Corporation, with prejudice in this action, and there<br />
being no opposition thereto,<br />
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against<br />
defendant, Treadwell Corporation, be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and<br />
without costs.<br />
Dated: New Y rk, New York<br />
73, ,20<strong>11</strong><br />
Attorney Michele J. for Mittlk'man, Defendant Esq.<br />
1Attorney for Plaintiffs<br />
Treadwell Corporation<br />
Joseph Mullen<br />
MCGIVNEY & KLUGER, P.C.<br />
Weitz & Luxenberg, P.C.<br />
80 Broad Street-Suite 2300 700 Broadway<br />
New York, New York 100<strong>04</strong><br />
New York, New York 10003 F\@<br />
(212) 509-3456 (212) 558-5500<br />
SO ORDERED,<br />
N0038955- 1<br />
123523379
I<br />
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK<br />
COUNTY OF NEW YORK<br />
IN RE: NEW YORK COUNTY j NYCAL<br />
ASBESTOS LITIGATION<br />
j I.A.S. Part 30<br />
(Heitler, J.)<br />
THIS DOCUMENT REFERS TO:<br />
j Index No.: 190270/10<br />
JOSEPH MULLEN,<br />
-against-<br />
A. C. & S., INC., el d.,<br />
Plaintiffs, / NO OPPOSITION<br />
! SUMMARY JUDGMENT<br />
j MOTION AND ORDER<br />
Defendants,<br />
WHEREFORE, defendant, Courter & Company, Inc., hereby requests<br />
judgment in the above entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules 5 3212,<br />
summary<br />
ismissing<br />
plaintiffs’ complaint against defendant, Courter & Company, Inc., with prejudice in this action,<br />
and there being no opposition thereto,<br />
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against<br />
defendant, Courter & Company, Inc., be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and<br />
without costs.<br />
Dated: New Y rk, New York<br />
qq ,20<strong>11</strong><br />
1Attorney for Plaintiffs<br />
Joseph Mullen<br />
MCGIVNEY & UUGER, P.C.<br />
Weitz & Luxenberg, P.C.<br />
80 Broad Street-Suite 2300<br />
700 Broadway<br />
New York, New Y ork 100<strong>04</strong><br />
New York, New York 100<br />
(212) 509-3456 (212) 558-5500<br />
N0038955-1
190270/10<br />
-against-<br />
Plaintiff(s),<br />
NO OPPOSITION<br />
SUMMARY JUDGMENT<br />
MOTION AND ORDER<br />
WHEREFORE, Defendant BWLP, Inc., hereby requests Summary Judgment in the aboveentitled<br />
case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Sections 3212, dismissing plaintiffs complaint<br />
against Defendant BW/IP, Inc., with prejudice, and there being no opposition thereto,<br />
OFtDERF,D, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against Defendant,<br />
BWIP, Inc., be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and without costs to either party.<br />
Dated: New Yo New York<br />
44%///<br />
'E.<br />
h~p, 2 6 ZQl'<br />
f Ai<br />
\.:1 l.",$SK<br />
I<br />
auPj<br />
OPPW<br />
Ted Eder, Esq.<br />
&-)UN ry CLERK'S<br />
SEGAL McCAMBRIDGE SINGER &<br />
Attorneys for Plaintiff<br />
MAHONEY, LTD.<br />
700 Broadway Attorneys for Defendant<br />
New York, NY 10003<br />
850 Third Avenue, Suite <strong>11</strong>00<br />
New York, New York 10022<br />
SO ORDERED,
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK<br />
COUNTY OF NEW YORK<br />
IN RE: NEW YORK COUNTY i NYCAL<br />
ASBESTOS LITIGATION<br />
j I.A.S. Part 30<br />
! (Heitler, J.)<br />
THIS DOCUMENT REFERS TO:<br />
j Index No.: 190270/10<br />
JOSEPH MULLEN,<br />
-against-<br />
A. C. & S., INC., et al.,<br />
Plaintiffs,<br />
Defendants.<br />
i NO OPPOSITION<br />
SUMMARY JUDGMENT<br />
i MOTION AND ORDER<br />
WHEREFORE, defendant, The Fairbanks Company, hereby requests summary judgment<br />
in the above entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules 6 3212, dismissing<br />
plaintiffs’ complaint against defendant, The Fairbanks Company, with prejudice in this action,<br />
and there being no opposition thereto,<br />
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against<br />
defendant, The Fairbanks Company, be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and<br />
without costs.<br />
&i?k&<br />
Attorney for Defendant<br />
Attorney for Plaintiffs<br />
The Fairbanks Company<br />
Joseph Mullen<br />
MCGIVNEY & KI,UGER, P.C.<br />
Weitz & Luxenberg, P.C.<br />
80 Broad Street-Suite 2300 700 Broadway<br />
New York, New York 100<strong>04</strong> New Y ork, New Y ork 10003<br />
(212) 509-3456 (212) 558-5500<br />
5<strong>04</strong>-0658<br />
N0038955-1<br />
APR 15 20<strong>11</strong>
SIJPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK<br />
COUNTY OF NEW YORK<br />
IN RE NEW YORK CITY NYCAL<br />
ASBESTOS LITIGATION I.A.S. Part 30<br />
(Heitler, J.)<br />
x<br />
This Document Relates to: Index No. 190288/10<br />
X<br />
AARON RICHMAN<br />
X<br />
NO OPPOSITION<br />
SUMMARY JUDGMENT<br />
MOTION AND ORDER<br />
WHEREFORE, Defendant The Montalvo Corporation (sued herein as “Montalvo<br />
Corporation [The]” ) (hereinafter “Montalvo”) hereby requests summary judgment in the aboveentitled<br />
case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212, dismissing plaintiffs<br />
complaint against Montalvo with prejudice, and there being no opposition thereto,<br />
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross-claims against<br />
by dismissed with prejudice and without costs.<br />
546 Fifth Avenue, 4th Floor<br />
150 Broadway, Suite 600<br />
New York, New York 10036<br />
New York, New York 10038<br />
(212) 681-1575 (212) 791-0285<br />
D<br />
APR 15 20<strong>11</strong>
I<br />
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK<br />
COUNTY OF NEW YORK<br />
IN RE: NEW YORK COUNTY<br />
NYCAL<br />
ASBESTOS LITIGATION<br />
1,A.S. Part 30<br />
(Heitler, J.)<br />
THIS DOCUMENT REFERS TO:<br />
THOMAS THATER, AS EXECUTOR FOR THE<br />
ESTATE OF ROBERT THATER,<br />
-against-<br />
Plaintiffs,<br />
Index No.: 190297/10<br />
NO OPPOSITION<br />
SUMMARY JUDGMENT<br />
MOTION AND ORDER<br />
A. C. & S., INC., et al.,<br />
Defendants.<br />
WHEREFORE, defendant, Patterson Pump Co., hereby requests summary judgment in<br />
the above entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules 6 3212, dismissing plaintiffs'<br />
complaint against defendant, Patterson Pump Co., with prejudice in this action, and there being<br />
no opposition thereto,<br />
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against<br />
defendant, Patterson Pump Co., be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and without<br />
costs.<br />
Pi<br />
Attorney for Defendant<br />
Patterson Pump Co.<br />
Estate of Robert Thater<br />
MCGIVNEY & KLUGER, P.C.<br />
Weitz & Luxenberg, P.C.<br />
80 Broad Street-Suite 2300<br />
700 Broadway<br />
New York. New York 100<strong>04</strong><br />
(212) 509-3456 (212) 558-5500<br />
New York, New York 10003 ' -<br />
LpR 2 6 N'<br />
\<br />
SO ORDERED,<br />
N0038955-1<br />
Hon. Sherry Klein Heitler<br />
454-<strong>11</strong>953
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK<br />
COUNTY OF NEW YORK<br />
IN RE: NEW YORK COUNTY<br />
! NYCAL<br />
ASBESTOS LITIGATION j I.A.S. Part 30<br />
j (Heitler, J.)<br />
THIS DOCUMENT REFERS TO:<br />
j Index No.: 190297/10<br />
THOMAS THATER, AS EXECUTOR FOR THE !<br />
ESTATE OF ROBERT THATER,<br />
i NO OPPOSITION<br />
Plaintiffs, i SUMMARY JUDGMENT<br />
MOTION AND ORDER<br />
-against-<br />
A. C. & S., INC., et al.,<br />
Defendants.<br />
i<br />
WHEREFORE, defendant, The Fairbanks Company, hereby requests summary judgment<br />
in the above entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules 5 3212, dismissing<br />
plaintiffs' complaint against defendant, The Fairbanks Company, with prejudice in this action,<br />
and there being no opposition thereto,<br />
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against<br />
defendant, The Fairbanks Company, be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and<br />
without costs.<br />
/-\<br />
Attorney for Defendant<br />
The Fairbanks Company<br />
MCGIVNEY & KLUGER, P.C.<br />
80 Broad Street-Suite 2300<br />
cw i4+ kps"7,Esp<br />
Attorney for Plaintiffs<br />
Estate of Robert Thater<br />
Weitz & Luxenberg, P.C.<br />
700 Broadway<br />
New York, New York I0003<br />
New York, New York 100<strong>04</strong><br />
(2 12) 509-3456 (212) 558-5500<br />
-.".",...<br />
y\pN ~o:KoFF\Go'<br />
LE@<br />
SO ORDERED, " c,ouN~<br />
Hon. Sherry Klein Heitler<br />
5<strong>04</strong>-0648<br />
N0038955-1<br />
D
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK<br />
COUNTY OF NEW YORK<br />
IN RE: NEW YORK COUNTY<br />
NYCAL<br />
ASBESTOS LITIGATION<br />
I.A.S. Part 30<br />
(Heitler, J.)<br />
THIS DOCUMENT REFERS TO:<br />
THOMAS THATER, AS EXECUTOR FOR THE<br />
ESTATE OF ROBERT THATER,<br />
-against-<br />
A. C. & S., INC., et al.,<br />
Plaintiffs ,<br />
Defendants.<br />
Index No.: 190297/10<br />
NO OPPOSITION<br />
SUMMARY JUDGMENT<br />
MOTION AND ORDER<br />
WHEREFORE7 defendant, Aurora Pump Company, hereby requests summary judgment<br />
in the above entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules § 3212, dismissing<br />
plaintiffs' complaint against defendant, Aurora Pump Company, with prejudice in this action,<br />
and there being no opposition thereto,<br />
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against<br />
defendant, Aurora Pump Company, be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and<br />
without costs,<br />
d-<br />
Dated: New ork, New Y ork<br />
,20<strong>11</strong><br />
Attorney for Defendant<br />
Aurora Pump Company<br />
MCGJVNEY & KLUGER, P.C.<br />
80 Broad Street-Suite 2300<br />
k<br />
vf kL<br />
Attorney for Plaintiffs<br />
Estate of Robert Thater<br />
Weitz & Luxenberg, P.C.<br />
700 Broadway<br />
Fqq, uI/.<br />
FILED<br />
New York, New York 100<strong>04</strong> NewYork,NewYork 10003 APR 2 6 20<strong>11</strong><br />
(212) 509-3456 (212) 558-5500<br />
SO ORDERED,<br />
NEW YORK<br />
COUNTY CLERK'S OFFlCt<br />
1003-0392<br />
N0038955-1<br />
APR 13 20<strong>11</strong>
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK<br />
COUNTY OF NEW YOFX<br />
TN RE: NEW YORK COUNTY<br />
NYCAL<br />
ASBESTOS LITIGATION<br />
I.A.S. Part 30<br />
(Heitler, J.)<br />
THIS DOCUMENT REFERS TO:<br />
Index No.: 190297/10<br />
ROBERT THATER,<br />
-against-<br />
A. C. & S., INC., et al.,<br />
Plaintiffs,<br />
Defendants.<br />
NO OPPOSITION<br />
SUMMARY JUDGMENT<br />
MOTION AND ORDER<br />
WHEREFORE, defendant, Saint-Gobain Abrasives, Inc., hereby requests summary<br />
judgment in the above entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules 6 32 12, dismissing<br />
plaintiffs’ complaint against defendant, Saint-Gobain Abrasives, Inc., with prejudice in this<br />
action, and there being no opposition thereto,<br />
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against<br />
defendant, Saint-Gobain Abrasives, Inc., be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice<br />
and without costs.<br />
Dated: New ork, New York<br />
$7 ,20<strong>11</strong><br />
Laura B. Hollman, Esqf<br />
Attorney for Defendant<br />
Saint-Gobain Abrasives, Inc.<br />
MCGIVNEY & KLUGER, P.C.<br />
80 Broad Street-Suite 2300<br />
New York, New York 100<strong>04</strong><br />
Attorney for Plaintiffs<br />
Estate of Robert Thater<br />
Weitz & Luxenberg, P.C.<br />
700 Broadway<br />
New York, New York 10003<br />
(212) 509-3456 (212) 558-5500<br />
SO ORDERED,<br />
2<strong>04</strong>7-47s<br />
N0038955-1
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK<br />
COUNTY OF NEW YORK<br />
IN RE: NEW YORK COUNTY<br />
i NYCAL<br />
ASBESTOS LITIGATION<br />
j I.A.S. Part 30<br />
j (Heitler, J.)<br />
THIS DOCUMENT REFERS TO:<br />
i Index No.: 190297/10<br />
ROBERT THATER,<br />
-against-<br />
A. C. & S., INC., et al.,<br />
Plaintiffs, i NO OPPOSITION<br />
! SUMMARY JUDGMENT<br />
i MOTION AND ORDER<br />
Defendants.<br />
i<br />
WHEREFORE, defendant, Flowserve Corporation fWa The Duriron Company, Inc.,<br />
hereby requests summary judgment in the above entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law<br />
and Rules 0 3212, dismissing plaintiffs’ complaint against defendant, Flowserve Corporation<br />
fMa The Duriron Company, Inc., with prejudice in this action, and there being no opposition<br />
thereto,<br />
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against<br />
defendant, Flowserve Corporation fMa The Duriron Company, Inc., be and the same are hereby<br />
dismissed with prejudice and without costs.<br />
eachd6<br />
N. %JdJQq,<br />
ts$.<br />
Matthew T. Fairley, E@.<br />
Attorney for Defendant<br />
Attorney for Plaintiffs<br />
Flowserve Corporation<br />
Estate of Robert Thater<br />
MCGIVNEY & KLUGER, P.C.<br />
80 Broad Street-Suite 2300<br />
700 Broadway<br />
New York, New York 100<strong>04</strong><br />
New York, New York 10003<br />
(212) 509-3456 APR 2 6 20<strong>11</strong><br />
Weitz&Luenberg,~.F I L E D<br />
,.e<br />
SO ORDERED,<br />
NEW YORK<br />
COUNTY CLERK‘S OFFICE<br />
951-896<br />
N003895S-I<br />
APR 15 20<strong>11</strong>
I<br />
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK<br />
COUNTY OF NEW YOK<br />
IN RE: NEW YORK COUNTY<br />
! NYCAL<br />
ASBESTOS LITIGATION<br />
i I.A.S. Part 30<br />
! (Heitler, J.)<br />
THIS DOCUMENT REFERS TO:<br />
j Index No.: 190297/10<br />
THOMAS THATER, AS EXECUTOR FOR THE<br />
ESTATE OF ROBERT THATER,<br />
/ NO OPPOSITION<br />
Plaintiffs, i SUMMARY JUDGMENT<br />
/ MOTION AND ORDER<br />
-against-<br />
A. C. & S., INC., et al.,<br />
Defendants. !<br />
WHEREFORE, defendant, Falk Corporation, hereby requests summary judgment in the<br />
above entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules $ 3212, dismissing plaintif€s’<br />
complaint against defendant, Falk Corporation, with prejudice in this action, and there being no<br />
opposition thereto,<br />
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against<br />
defendant, Falk Corporation, be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and without<br />
costs.<br />
Dated: New York New York<br />
.rJl ,20<strong>11</strong><br />
Matthew T. Fairley, Esq.<br />
Attorney for Defendant<br />
Falk Corporation<br />
MCGWNEY & KLUGER, P.C.<br />
80 Broad Street-Suite 2300<br />
New York, New York 100<strong>04</strong><br />
C h k @- Rmcr, K ,<br />
Attorney for Plaintiffs ’-3<br />
Estate of Robert Thater<br />
WeitzaLuxenLrg, p.c. F 1 L E D<br />
700 Broadway<br />
New York, New York 10003<br />
(2 12) 509-3456 (2 12) 558-5500 APR 2 6 20”<br />
SO ORDERED,<br />
r4E-N Y QRK<br />
875-0068<br />
N0038955-1<br />
APR I520<strong>11</strong>
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK<br />
COUNTY OF NEW YORK<br />
IN RE: NEW YORK COUNTY<br />
NYCAL<br />
ASBESTOS LITIGATION<br />
I.A.S. Part 30<br />
(Heitler, J.)<br />
THIS DOCUMENT REFERS TO:<br />
THOMAS THATER, AS EXECUTOR FOR THE<br />
ESTATE OF ROBERT THATER,<br />
Plaintiffs,<br />
-against-<br />
Index No.: 190297/10<br />
NO OPPOSITION<br />
SUMMARY JUDGMENT<br />
MOTION AND ORDER<br />
A. C. & S., INC., et al.,<br />
Defendants ,<br />
WHEREFORE, defendant, Saint-Gobain Abrasives, Inc., hereby requests summary<br />
judgment in the above entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules 8 3212, dismissing<br />
plaintiffs’ complaint against defendant, Saint-Gobain Abrasives, hc., with prejudice in this<br />
9 .*<br />
action, and there being no opposition thereto,<br />
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against<br />
defendant, Saint-Gobain Abrasives, Inc., be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice<br />
and without costs.<br />
Laura B. Hollman, Esq.’<br />
Attorney for Defendant<br />
Saint-Gobain Abrasives, Inc.<br />
MCGWNEY & KLUGER, P.C.<br />
80 Broad Street-Suite 2300<br />
New York, New York 100<strong>04</strong><br />
Attorney for Plaintiffs<br />
Estate of Robert Thater<br />
Weitz & Luxenberg, P.C.<br />
700 Broadway<br />
New Yark, New York 10003<br />
(212) 509-3456 (212) 558-5500<br />
FILED<br />
APR 2 6 20<strong>11</strong><br />
**e<br />
2<strong>04</strong>1415<br />
N0038955-1
!I<br />
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK<br />
COUNTY OF NEW YORK<br />
IN RE: NEW YORK COUNTY j NYCAL<br />
ASBESTOS LITIGATION<br />
j I.A.S. Part 30<br />
j (Heitler, J.)<br />
THIS DOCUMENT REFERS TO:<br />
i Index No.: 190297/10<br />
THOMAS THATER, AS EXECUTOR FOR THE i<br />
ESTATE OF ROBERT THATER,<br />
i NO OPPOSITION<br />
Plaintiffs, i SUMMARY JUDGMENT<br />
MOTION AND ORDER<br />
-against-<br />
A. C. & S., INC., et al.,<br />
Defendants.<br />
WHEREFORE, defendant, Flowserve Corporation fMa The Duriron Company, Inc.,<br />
hereby requests summary judgment in the above entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law<br />
and Rules 0 32 12, dismissing plaintiffs’ complaint against defendant, Flowserve Corporation<br />
fMa The Duriron Company, Inc., with prejudice in this action, and there being no opposition<br />
.,..<br />
thereto,<br />
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against<br />
defendant, Flowserve Corporation fMa The Duriron Company, Inc., be and the same are hereby<br />
dismissed with prejudice and without costs.<br />
Matthew T. Faid&, Esq.<br />
Attorney for Defendant<br />
Flowserve Corporation<br />
MCGlVNEY & KLUGER, P.C.<br />
80 Broad Street-Suite 2300<br />
Attorney for Plaintiffs<br />
Estate of Robert Thater<br />
Weitz & Luxenberg, P.C.<br />
700 Broadway<br />
New York. New York 100<strong>04</strong> n New York, New York 10003<br />
(212) 509-3456 (212) 558-5500<br />
FILED<br />
APR 2 6 20<strong>11</strong><br />
NEW YORK<br />
SO ORDERED,<br />
N0038955- I<br />
Hon. Sherry mein Heitler<br />
951-896
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK<br />
COUNTY OF NEW YORK<br />
IN RE: NEW YORK CITY ASBESTOS LITIGATION<br />
This Document Relates To:<br />
THOMAS THATER, as Executor for the Estate of<br />
ROBERT THATER,<br />
Plaintiff( s),<br />
-against-<br />
AIR & LIQUID SYSTEMS CORPORATION, et al., :<br />
Defendants.<br />
A-<br />
:<br />
NYCAL<br />
I.A.S. Part 30<br />
(Hon. Sherry Klein Heitler)<br />
Index No.: 190297-10<br />
NO-OPPOSITION SUMMARY<br />
JUDGMENT MOTION AND<br />
ORDER<br />
WHEREFORE, defendant CRANE CO. hereby requests summary judgment in the<br />
above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212, dismissing<br />
plaintiffs' complaint against defendant CRANE CO. with prejudice, and there being no<br />
opposition thereto,<br />
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against<br />
defendant CRANE CO. be, and the same are hereby, dismissed with prejudice and Without costs.<br />
Attorneys for Plaintiff(s)<br />
700 Broadway CRANE CO. ApR 2 6 20''<br />
New York, NY 10003<br />
599 Lexington Avenue<br />
(212) 558-5500 New York, NY 10022 b:E,w yoM<br />
OFF\=*<br />
(212) 536-3900 , dry CLERKS<br />
t'X3L.E<br />
SO ORDERED,<br />
APR I5 20<strong>11</strong>
,&-<br />
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK<br />
COUNTY OF NEW YORK<br />
_________<strong>11</strong>_1_________________t_________-~---*-*----<br />
X<br />
IN RE: NEW YORK CITY : NYCAL<br />
ASBESTOS LITIGATION<br />
_________---_I”-_~-_f__________________”~---------------------------<br />
X<br />
This Document Relates To:<br />
: Index No. 19030U10<br />
DONALD B. SISSON and PATRICIA SISSON,<br />
-against-<br />
Plaintiff(s), : NO OPPOSITION<br />
: SUMMARY JUDGMENT<br />
: MOTION AND ORDER<br />
ARMSTRONG INTERNATIONAL, INC., et al.,<br />
Defendants.<br />
: Hon. Sherry Klein Heitler<br />
: IASPart39<br />
WHEREFORE, defendant Crown Cork & Seal USA, Inc. (“Crown”) hereby requests<br />
summary judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to CPLR 321 2, dismissing plaintiff‘s<br />
complaint against Crown with prejudice, and there being no opposition thereto, it is hereby:<br />
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against<br />
Crown be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and without costs.<br />
Dated: N w Yor ,NewYork<br />
3#/3+,/<br />
EARLY & STRAUSS L.L.C.<br />
Attorneys for Plaintiff<br />
FL,EMMING ZULACK WILLIAMSON ZAUDERER LLP<br />
n Cork & Seal USA, Inc.<br />
By: ~~<br />
ark Bibro, Esq,<br />
360 Lexington Avenue<br />
New York, New York 10017<br />
(212) 986-2233 (212) 412-9500<br />
360951/2<strong>11</strong>08
WHEREFORE, defendant CRANE CO. hereby requests summary judgment in the<br />
above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 32 12, dismissing<br />
i<br />
plaintiff's complaint against defendant CRANE CO. with prejudice, and there being no<br />
opposition thereto,<br />
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against<br />
defendant CRANE CO. be, and the same are hereby, dismissed with prejudice and without costs.<br />
700 Broadway<br />
New York, NY 10003<br />
(212) 558-5500<br />
SO ORDERED,
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK<br />
COUNTY OF NEW YORK<br />
IN RE: NEW YORK COUNTY<br />
NYCAL<br />
ASBESTOS LITIGATION<br />
I.A.S. Part 30<br />
(Heitler, J.)<br />
THIS DOCUMENT REFERS TO:<br />
Index No.: 1903<strong>11</strong>/10<br />
ALVIN BICKEL AND MARIAN BICKEL,<br />
-against-<br />
A. C. & S., INC., et al.,<br />
Plaintiffs,<br />
Defendants.<br />
NO OPPOSITION<br />
SUMMARY JUDGMENT<br />
MOTION AND ORDER<br />
WHEREFORE, defendant, Patterson Pump Co., hereby requests summary judgment in<br />
the above entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules 0 3212, dismissing plaintiffs'<br />
complaint against defendant, Patterson Pump Co., with prejudice in this action, and there being<br />
no opposition thereto,<br />
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against<br />
defendant, Patterson Pump Co., be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and without<br />
costs.<br />
we<br />
Dated: Ne York, New York<br />
q77 ,20<strong>11</strong><br />
Attorney for Defendant<br />
Patterson Pump CO.<br />
MCGIVNEY & KLUGER, P.C.<br />
80 Broad Street-Suite 2300<br />
New York, New York 100<strong>04</strong><br />
(212) 509-3456<br />
Attorney for Plaintiffs<br />
Alvin Bickel and Marian Bickel @%+<br />
Weitz & Luxenberg, P.C. r,<br />
700 Broadway<br />
New York, New York 10003<br />
(212) 558-5500<br />
'- -&--'<br />
SO ORDERED,<br />
_*. ~"<br />
-w<br />
Hon. Sherry Kxn Heitler<br />
454-1 2019
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK<br />
COUNTY OF NEW YORK<br />
IN RE: NEW YORK COUNTY<br />
i NYCAL<br />
ASBESTOS LITIGATION<br />
j I.A.S. Part 30<br />
j (Heitler, J.)<br />
THIS DOCUMENT REFERS TO:<br />
j Index No.: 190312/10<br />
DONALD JEFFERY AND CINDY JEFFERY,<br />
-against-<br />
A. C. & S., INC., et al.,<br />
Plaintiffs,<br />
Defendants.<br />
i NO OPPOSITION<br />
SUMMARY JUDGMENT<br />
i MOTION AND ORDER<br />
WHEREFORE, defendant, Patterson Pump Co., hereby requests summary judgment in<br />
the above entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules 5 3212, dismissing plaintiffs’<br />
complaint against defendant, Patterson Pump Co., with prejudice in this action, and there being<br />
no opposition thereto,<br />
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against<br />
defendant, Patterson Pump Co., be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and without<br />
costs.<br />
Dated: New Yojk, New York<br />
Attorney for Defendant<br />
Patterson Pump Co.<br />
MCGWNEY & KLUGER, P.C.<br />
80 Broad Street-Suite 2300<br />
New York, New York 100<strong>04</strong><br />
(212) 509-3456 (21 2) 558-5500<br />
Donald Jeffery and Cindy Jeffery<br />
Weitz & Luxenberg, P.C.<br />
700 Broadway<br />
New York, New York 10003<br />
* FILED i<br />
SO ORDERED, APR 2 6 20<strong>11</strong><br />
Hon. Sherry Klein Hkitler<br />
N0038955-1
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK<br />
COUNTY OF NEW YORK<br />
IN RE: NEW YORK COUNTY<br />
i NYCAL<br />
ASBESTOS LITIGATION<br />
j I.A.S. Part 30<br />
i (Heitler, J.)<br />
THIS DOCUMENT REFERS TO:<br />
i Index No.: 190314/10<br />
ANGELINA VINTICINQUO AND VINCENT<br />
j<br />
VINTICINQUO,<br />
i NO OPPOSITION<br />
Plaintiffs, j SUMMARY JUDGMENT<br />
-against-<br />
A. C. & S., INC., et al.,<br />
j MOTION AND ORDER<br />
Defendants.<br />
I<br />
WHEREFORE7 defendant, Oakfabco, Inc., hereby requests summary judgment in the<br />
above entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules 6 3212, dismissing plaintiffs’<br />
complaint against defendant, Oakfabco, Inc., with prejudice in this action, and there being no<br />
opposition thereto,<br />
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against<br />
defendant, Oakfabco, Inc., be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and without<br />
costs.<br />
Robert Darish, Esq.<br />
Attorney for Defendant<br />
Oakfabco, Inc.<br />
MCGIVNEY & KLUGEK, P.C.<br />
80 Broad Street-Suite 2300<br />
New York, New York 100<strong>04</strong><br />
(212) 509-3456<br />
Angelina Vinticinquo and Vincent Vinticinquo<br />
Weitz & Luxenberg, P.C.<br />
700 Broadway<br />
New York, New York 10003<br />
FFICE~<br />
SO ORDERED,<br />
NO03895 5- 1<br />
APR 15 20<strong>11</strong><br />
2571-0674
-against-<br />
Plaintiff( s),<br />
NO OPPOSITION<br />
SUMMARY JUDGMENT<br />
MOTION AND ORDER<br />
WHEREFORE, Defendant BW/IP, Inc., hereby requests Summary Judgment in the aboveentitled<br />
case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Sections 3212, dismissing plaintiffs complaint<br />
against Defendant BW/IP, Inc., with prejudice, and there being no opposition thereto,<br />
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against Defendant,<br />
BW/P, Inc., be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and without costs to either party.<br />
Dated: New York, Ney Yo&<br />
SEGAL McCAMBRIDGE SINGER &<br />
Attorneys for Plaintiff<br />
MAHONEY, LTD.<br />
700 Broadway Attorneys for Defendant<br />
New York, NY 10003 850 Third Avenue, Suite <strong>11</strong>00<br />
New York, New York 10022<br />
SO ORDERED,
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK<br />
COUNTY OF NEW YORK<br />
IN RE: NEW YORK COUNTY<br />
NYCAL<br />
ASBESTOS LITIGATION<br />
I.A.S. Part 30<br />
(Heitler, J.)<br />
THIS DOCUMENT REFERS TO:<br />
Index No.: 190315/10<br />
RICHARD FOLEY AND ANNA FOLEY,<br />
-against-<br />
A. C. & S., INC., et ul.,<br />
Plaintiffs,<br />
Defendants.<br />
NO OPPOSITION<br />
SUMMARY JUDGMENT<br />
MOTION AND ORDER<br />
WHEREFORE, defendant, The Fairbanks Company, hereby requests summary judgment<br />
in the above entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules 6 3212, dismissing<br />
plaintiffs' complaint against defendant, The Fairbanks Company, with prejudice in this action,<br />
and there being no opposition thereto,<br />
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against<br />
defendant, The Fairbanks Company, be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and<br />
without costs.<br />
Okwedeo N. Okoh, Esq.<br />
Attorney for Defendant<br />
The Fairbanks Company<br />
MCGIVNEY & KLUGER, P.C.<br />
80 Broad Street-Suite 2300<br />
Attorney for Plaintiffs<br />
Richard Foley and Anna Foley<br />
Weitz & Luxenberg, P.C.<br />
700 Broadway<br />
New York, New York 10003<br />
!<br />
New York, New York 100<strong>04</strong> FILED 1<br />
(212) 509-3456<br />
SO ORDEED,<br />
5<strong>04</strong>$@y~<br />
APR 2 6 20<strong>11</strong><br />
ww Y9WK<br />
i Y CLERK'S OFFICE'<br />
N0038955-1<br />
APR 16 40<strong>11</strong>
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK<br />
. COWTY OF NEW YORK<br />
IN RE: NEW YORK COUNTY<br />
I NYCAL<br />
ASBESTOS LITIGATION<br />
I.A.S.Part30<br />
I<br />
,(Heitler, J.)<br />
THIS DOCUMENT REFERS TO:<br />
I<br />
i Index No.: 190323/10<br />
MANUEL A. CHINEA AND JANET M. CHINEA, I<br />
-against-<br />
Plainti ff(s),<br />
AMERICAN OPTICAL COMPANY, et al.,<br />
..<br />
-. . . - -- - -<br />
Defendant( . s)<br />
- -. . --<br />
I<br />
I<br />
I<br />
I<br />
i NO OPPOSITION<br />
SUMMARY JUDGMENT<br />
MOTION AND ORDER<br />
I<br />
I<br />
I -- - - .. . - -. - .<br />
WHEREFORE, defendant Sid Harvey Industries, Inc., hereby requests summary judgment<br />
in the above entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules 6 32 12, dismissing plaintiffs<br />
complaint against defendant, Sid Harvey Industries, Inc. with prejudice, and there being no<br />
opposition thereto,<br />
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and moss claims against<br />
defendant, Sid Harvey Industries, Inc., be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and<br />
without costs.<br />
I<br />
. . I<br />
I<br />
,!,.<br />
Dated: New York, New York<br />
ppd r)- ,20<strong>11</strong><br />
Robert Darish Esq.<br />
MCGIVNEY & KLUGER, P.C.<br />
Attorneys for Defendants<br />
r i a Ea&/<br />
EARLY & STRAUSS, L.L.C.<br />
Attorneys for Plaintiffs<br />
Sid Harvey Industries, Inc.<br />
Manuel A Chinea and Jan<br />
80 Broad Street - 23rd Floor<br />
360 Lexington Avenue, 20<br />
New York, New York 100<strong>04</strong><br />
New York, New York. 10017<br />
(212) 509-3456 (212) 986-2233 6 ~ 6 20;F'f ~ ~ 2<br />
SO ORDERED,<br />
_+^ * "<br />
Hon. Sherry Klein Heitler APR 1<br />
tqF.'!JV Yon%<br />
URNS OFF@;<br />
066477<br />
INOM2278- I }
NYCAL<br />
I.A.S. Part 30<br />
Hon. Sherry Klein Heitler, J.S.C.<br />
JAMES PALUMBO and CONCElTA PALUMBO,<br />
Index No.: 190329-2010<br />
-against-<br />
Plaintiffs,<br />
NO OPPOSITION SUMMARY JUDGMENT<br />
MOTION AND ORDER<br />
AMERICAN BILTRITE, INC., Individually and as Successor to<br />
Amtico Floors, et al. including,<br />
GATES CORPORATION,<br />
Defendants.<br />
WHEREFORE, defendant THE GATES CORPORATION, sued herein as GATES CORPORATION<br />
hereby request summary judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules<br />
Section 3212, dismissing plaintiff's complaint against defendant GATES with prejudice, and there being<br />
no opposition thereto,<br />
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against defendant<br />
THE GATES CORPORATION be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and without costs<br />
Sedgwick, Detert, Moran & Arnold, LLP<br />
Attorney for Plaint#fs<br />
Attorneys for The Gates Corporation<br />
700 Broadway Three Gateway Center,<br />
New York, New York 10003<br />
Newark, NJ 07102<br />
(212) 558-5500 (973) 242-0002<br />
SO ORDERED,
THEODORE DENARO and CARMELA DENARO, Index No.: 190331-2010<br />
BMCE INC. et al. including,<br />
GATES CORPORATION,<br />
-against-<br />
Plaintiffs,<br />
NO OPPOSITION SUMMARY JUDGMENT<br />
MOTION AND ORDER<br />
Defendants.<br />
WHEREFORE, defendant THE GATES CORPORATION, sued herein as GATES CORPORATION<br />
hereby request summary judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules<br />
Section 3212, dismissing plaintiffs complaint against defendant GATES with prejudice, and there being<br />
no opposition thereto,<br />
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against defendant<br />
THE GATES CORPORATION be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and without costs.<br />
(7\ -<br />
David A.h&&!f 1 . Dennis E. Vega, Esq.<br />
Weitz & Luxenberg, P.C.<br />
Sedgwick, Detert, Moran & Arnold, LLP<br />
Attorney for Plaintiffs<br />
Attorneys for The Gates Corporution<br />
700 Broadway<br />
Three Gateway Center,<br />
New York, New York 10003<br />
Newark, NJ 07102<br />
(212) 558-5500 (973) 242-0002<br />
SO ORDERED,
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK<br />
COUNTY OF NEW YORK<br />
IN RE: NEW YORK COUNTY ASBESTOS<br />
LITIGATION<br />
This Document Relates to:<br />
WILFRED JOSEPH GOGEL and CATHERINE<br />
JOSEPHINE GOGEL,<br />
Index No.: 190332/10<br />
NO OPPOSITION SUMMARY<br />
JUDMENT MOTION AND<br />
ORDER 1<br />
V.<br />
Blwintiff(s),<br />
A.O. SMITH WATER PRODUCTS, et al.,<br />
Defendan t(s).<br />
-----______________"<strong>11</strong>__________________---*-------------------------<br />
WHEREFORE, defendant, MEEM MANUFACTURING COMPANY, hereby requests<br />
summary judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section<br />
32 12, dismissing plaintiffs complaint against defendant, NEEM MANUFACTURING<br />
COMPANY, with prejudice, and there being no opposition thereto.<br />
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against<br />
defendant, NEEM MANUFACTURING COMPANY, be and the same are hereby is<br />
&*Q<br />
bVR<br />
6 TQ'<br />
@$OFF\@<br />
UN-8 GLE<br />
Lisa M. Pascarella, Esq.<br />
Braaten & Pascarella, LLC<br />
AttorneyW Plaintiff(s)<br />
Attorneys for Defendant<br />
546 Fifth Ave, 4th Floor Rheem Manufacturing Company<br />
New York, NY 10036 2430 Route 34<br />
(212) 681-1575<br />
Manasquan, New Jersey 08736<br />
(732) 528-8888<br />
SO ORDERED,<br />
Honorable Sherry K. Heitler<br />
fl APR 1520<strong>11</strong>
NYCAL<br />
I.A.S, Part 30<br />
(Heitler, J.)<br />
This Document Relates To:<br />
NO OPPOSITION SUMMARY<br />
JUDGMENT MOTION AND<br />
ORDER<br />
Index No.: 190332-10<br />
WHEREFORE, defendant SEQUOIA VENTURES INC. f/Ma BECHTEL COW.,<br />
hereby requests summary judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and<br />
Rules Section 3212, dismissing plaintiff's complaint against defendant SEQUOIA VENTURES<br />
INC. f/k/a BECHTEL CORP., with prejudice, and there being no opposition thereto,<br />
OIRDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against<br />
defendant SEQUOIA VENTURES INC. fMa BECHTEL CORP., be and the same are hereby<br />
dismissed with prejudice and without costs.<br />
FILED<br />
APR 2 6 20<strong>11</strong><br />
LANDMAN CORSI BALLAIN co &rn%TtOFFICe.<br />
(212) 681-1575<br />
SEQUOIA VENTURES INC.<br />
fMa BECHTEL COW.<br />
120 Broadway, 27th Floor<br />
New York, New York 10271 -0079<br />
(212) 238-4800<br />
So Ordered:<br />
Hon. Sherry Klein Heitler<br />
,::ODMNPCDOCS/WOCSNYIS I4405/1
.._<br />
This Document Relates to:<br />
WILFRED JOSEPH GOGEL and CATHERINE<br />
JOSEPHINE GOGEL,<br />
V.<br />
Plaintiff(s),<br />
Index No.: 190332llO<br />
NO OPPOSITION<br />
SUMMARY<br />
JUDGMENT MOTION AND<br />
ORDER<br />
A.O. SMITH WATER PRODUCTS, et al.,<br />
Defendant(s).<br />
WHEREFORE, defendant, BIRD INCOWORATED hereby requests summary judgment in<br />
the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212, dismissing<br />
plaintiffs complaint against defendants, BIRD INCORPORATED with prejudice, and there being<br />
no opposition thereo,<br />
ORDERED, that<br />
notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against<br />
be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and<br />
New York, New York 10036<br />
(212) 681-1575<br />
PASCARELLA, LLC<br />
Attorney for Defendant<br />
BIRD INCORPORATED<br />
2430 Route 34, Suite A-18<br />
Manasquan, New Jersey 08736<br />
Judge Sherry Klein Heitler
~ ~~~<br />
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK<br />
COUNTY OF NEW YORK<br />
This Document Relates To:<br />
Index No.: 190332/10<br />
WILFRED JOSEPH GOGEL and CATHERINE<br />
JOSEPHINE GOGEL,<br />
V.<br />
Plaintiff(s),<br />
NO OPPOSITION<br />
SUMMARY<br />
JUDGMENT MOTION AND<br />
ORDER<br />
A.O. SMITH WATER PRODUCTS, et al.,<br />
Defendants.<br />
WHEREFORE, defendant, TRANE US INC. f/k/a AMERICAN STANDARD INC., hereby<br />
requests summary judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules<br />
Section 3212, dismissing plaintiffs complaint against defendants, TRANE US INC, f/Wa<br />
AMERICAN STANDARD INC., with prejudice, and there being no opposition thereo,<br />
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against<br />
defendant TRANE US INC. flWa AMERICAN STANDARD INC., be and the sape p<br />
dismissed wiArejudice and without costs.<br />
1<br />
.*aL<br />
-- 4 fb<br />
, r',<br />
New York, New York 10036<br />
(212) 681-1575<br />
Lisa M. Pascarella, Esq.<br />
BRAATEN & PASCARELLA, LLC<br />
Attorney for Defendant<br />
TRANE US INC. W a AMERICAN<br />
STANDARD INC.,<br />
2430 Route 34, Suite A- 18<br />
Manasquan, New Jersey 08736<br />
(732) 528-8888<br />
Judge Sherry Klein Heitler APR 15 20<strong>11</strong>
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK<br />
COUNTY OF NEW YORK<br />
IN RE: NEW YORK COUNTY j NYCAL<br />
ASBESTOS LITIGATION<br />
j I.A.S. Part 30<br />
i (Heitler, J.)<br />
THIS DOCUMENT REFERS TO:<br />
j Index No.: 190335A 0<br />
SAM GALEN,<br />
A. C. & S., INC., el al.,<br />
Plaintiffs, i NO OPPOSITION<br />
j SUMMARY JUDGMENT<br />
-against- j MOTION AND ORDER<br />
Defendants. !<br />
WHEREFORE, defendant, Atwood & Morrill Co., Inc, hereby requests summary<br />
judgment in the above entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules 5 32 12, dismissing<br />
plaintiffs’ complaint against defendant, Atwood & Morrill Co., Inc, with prejudice in this action,<br />
and there being no opposition thereto,<br />
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against<br />
defendant, Atwood & Morrill Co., Inc, be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and<br />
without costs.<br />
Dated: New<br />
Yb<br />
ork, New York<br />
,20<strong>11</strong><br />
Laura B. Hollman, E&.<br />
Attorney for Defendant<br />
Atwood & Morrill Co., Inc<br />
MCGIVNEY & KLUGER, P.C.<br />
80 Broad Street-Suite 2300<br />
New York, New York 100<strong>04</strong><br />
(212) 509-3456<br />
Sam Galen<br />
Weitz & Luxenberg, P.C.<br />
700 Broadway<br />
New York, New York<br />
(212)558-5500 L E D ’<br />
SO ORDERED,<br />
Hon. Sherry Klein Heitler<br />
APR 2 6<br />
N0038955-1
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK<br />
COUNTY OF NEW YORK<br />
IN RE: NEW YORK COUNTY<br />
ASBESTOS LITIGATION<br />
THIS DOCUMENT REFERS TO:<br />
SAM GALEN,<br />
A. C. & S., INC., et al.,<br />
: NYCAL<br />
j I.A.S. Part 30<br />
[ (Heitler, J.)<br />
j Index No.: 190335/10<br />
Plaintiffs, i NO OPPOSITION<br />
j SUMMARY JUDGMENT<br />
-against- j MOTION AND ORDER<br />
Defendants. :<br />
WHEREFORE, defendant, Treadwell Corporation, hereby requests summary judgment in<br />
the above entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules $ 321 2, dismissing plaintiffs'<br />
complaint against defendant, Treadwell Corporation, with prejudice in this action, and there<br />
being no opposition thereto,<br />
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against<br />
defendant, Treadwell Corporation, be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and<br />
without costs.<br />
Dated: New York New York<br />
4/7 ' ,20<strong>11</strong><br />
Michele J. MittleKan, Esq.<br />
Attorney for Defendant<br />
Treadwel I Corporation<br />
MCGIVNEY & KLUGER, P.C.<br />
80 Broad Street-Suite 2300<br />
New York, New York 100<strong>04</strong><br />
(2 12) 509-3456<br />
Cbks Y. Fe54~q E S ~<br />
Attorney for Plaintiffs<br />
Sam Galen<br />
Weitz & Luxenberg, P.C.<br />
700 Broadway cr*c<br />
NewYork,New York %bod L E D<br />
i<br />
(212) 558-5500<br />
N0038955- I
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK<br />
COUNTY OF NEW YORK<br />
IN RE: NEW YORK COUNTY<br />
! NYCAL<br />
ASBESTOS LITIGATION<br />
j I.A.S. Part 30<br />
! (Heitler, J.)<br />
THIS DOCUMENT REFERS TO:<br />
j Index No.: 190335/10<br />
SAM GALEN,<br />
A. C. & S., INC., et al.,<br />
Plaintiffs, i NO OPPOSITION<br />
! SUMMARY JUDGMENT<br />
-against- j MOTION AND ORDER<br />
Defendants. !<br />
WHEREFORE, defendant, Courter & Company, Inc., hereby requests<br />
judgment in the above entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules § 3212, I<br />
summary<br />
ismissing<br />
plaintiffs' complaint against defendant, Courter & Company, Inc., with prejudice in this action,<br />
and there being no opposition thereto,<br />
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against<br />
defendant, Courter & Company, he., be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and<br />
without costs.<br />
MCGIVNEY & KLUGER, P.C.<br />
80 Broad Street-Suite 2300<br />
New York, New York 100<strong>04</strong><br />
New 700 Broadway<br />
(212) 509-3456 (212) 558-5500<br />
e3<br />
C h k -fly-- -- FQUS", E+.<br />
Attorney for Plaintiffs<br />
Sam Galen<br />
Weitz & Luxenberg, P.C.<br />
York, New York 1000 FILED<br />
APR 2 6 20<strong>11</strong><br />
SO ORDERED,<br />
N0038955-1<br />
Hon. Sherry Klein Heitler<br />
f'iE\pd YOaK<br />
COUNTY CLERK'S OFF~C@<br />
<strong>11</strong>22-23850<br />
APR 1520<strong>11</strong>
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK<br />
COUNTY OF NEW YORK<br />
IN RE: NEW YORK COUNTY<br />
NYCAL<br />
ASBESTOS LITIGATION<br />
I.A.S. Part 30<br />
(Heitler, J.)<br />
THIS DOCUMENT REFERS TO:<br />
JOSEPH GEMELLARO AND CHRISTINE<br />
GEMELLARO,<br />
-against-<br />
A. C. & S., INC., et al.,<br />
Plaintiffs,<br />
Defendants.<br />
Index No.: 190336/10<br />
NO OPPOSITION<br />
SUMMARY JUDGMENT<br />
MOTION AND ORDER<br />
WHEREFORE7 defendant, Patterson Pump Co., hereby requests summary judgment in<br />
the above entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules 6 32 12, dismissing plaintiffs'<br />
complaint against defendant, Patterson Pump Co., with prejudice in this action, and there being<br />
no opposition thereto,<br />
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against<br />
defendant, Patterson Pump Co., be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and without<br />
costs.<br />
Dated: New York, New York<br />
417 ,20<strong>11</strong><br />
K e e n C@!, Esq.<br />
Attorney tor Defendant<br />
Patterson Pump Co.<br />
MCGIVNEY & KLUGER, P.C.<br />
80 Broad Street-Suite 2300<br />
New York, New York 100<strong>04</strong><br />
(212) . , 509-3456<br />
SO ORDERED,<br />
m /I/<br />
Hon. Sherry Klein HAtler<br />
Joseph Gemellaro and Christine Gemellaro<br />
Weitz & Luxenberg, P.C.<br />
700 Broadway<br />
New York, New Yg 1 AoL E 0<br />
(212) 558-5500<br />
NELV %3RK<br />
&EFKSOFFLcE)<br />
N003895S-1
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YOKK<br />
COUNTY OF NEW YORK<br />
IN RE: NEW YORK COUNTY<br />
NYCAL<br />
ASBESTOS LITIGATION<br />
I.A.S. Part 30<br />
(Heitler, J.)<br />
THIS DOCUMENT REFERS TO:<br />
JOSEPH GEMELLARO AND CHRISTINE<br />
GEMELLARO,<br />
-against-<br />
A. C. & S., INC., et al.,<br />
Plaintiffs,<br />
Defendants.<br />
Index No.: 190336/10<br />
NO OPPOSITION<br />
SUMMARY JUDGMENT<br />
MOTION AND ORDER<br />
WHEREFORE, defendant, The Fairbanks Company, hereby requests summary judgment<br />
in the above entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules 6 3212, dismissing<br />
plaintiffs' complaint against defendant, The Fairbanks Company, with prejudice in this action,<br />
and there being no opposition thereto,<br />
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against<br />
defendant, The Fairbanks Company, be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and<br />
without costs.<br />
Dated: New Y,ork, New York<br />
I<br />
yb ,20<strong>11</strong><br />
I<br />
-9<br />
Okwedeo N. Okoh, Esq.<br />
Attornev for Defendant<br />
The FaGbanks Company<br />
Joseph Gernellaro and Christine Gemellaro<br />
MCCIVNEY & KLUGER, P.C.<br />
Weitz & Luxenberg, P.C.<br />
80 Broad Street-Suite<br />
c<br />
2300<br />
700 Broadway FILED<br />
New York, New York 100<strong>04</strong><br />
New York, New York 10003<br />
(212) 509-3456<br />
(212) 558-5500 APR 2 6 20<strong>11</strong><br />
NEW YORK<br />
SO ORDERED,<br />
COUNTY CLERKS OFFICE-<br />
Hon. Sherry Klein Heitler<br />
N0038955-1<br />
5<strong>04</strong>-0649
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK<br />
COUNTY OF NEW YORK<br />
IN RE: NEW YORK COUNTY<br />
! NYCAL<br />
ASBESTOS LITIGATION<br />
j T.A.S. Part 30<br />
j (Heitler, J.)<br />
THIS DOCUMENT REFERS TO:<br />
j Index No.: 190337/10<br />
EDWARD C. KELLEY,<br />
A. C. & S., INC., et al.,<br />
Plaintiffs, i NO OPPOSITION<br />
! SUMMARY JUDGMENT<br />
-against- j MOTION AND ORDER<br />
Defendants. !<br />
WHEREFORE, defendant, The Fairbanks Company, hereby requests summary judgment<br />
in the above entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules 8 3212, dismissing<br />
plaintiffs’ complaint against defendant, The Fairbanks Company, with prejudice in this action,<br />
and there being no opposition thereto,<br />
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against<br />
defendant, The Fairbanks Company, be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and<br />
without costs.<br />
Okwedeo N. Okoh, Esq.<br />
Attorney for Defendant<br />
The Fairbanks Company<br />
Edward C. Kelley<br />
MCGIVNEY & KLUGER, P.C.<br />
Weitz & Luxenberg, P.C.<br />
80 Broad Street-Suite 2300<br />
700 Broadway<br />
New York, New York 100<strong>04</strong><br />
New York, New York 1000<br />
(212) 509-3456 (212) 558-5500<br />
@aih 2 6 20’<br />
SO ORDERED,<br />
Hon. Sherry Kle& Heitler<br />
5<strong>04</strong>-0654<br />
V\\E’d cIsRI(’s .ranK OFFIG@<br />
N0038955-1<br />
APR I 5 zow
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YON<br />
COUNTY OF NEW YORK<br />
IN RE: NEW YORK COUNTY<br />
j NYCAL<br />
ASBESTOS LITIGATION<br />
j I.A.S. Part 30<br />
i (Heitler, J.)<br />
THIS DOCUMENT REFERS TO:<br />
i Index No.: 190337/10<br />
EDWARD C. KELLEY,<br />
-against-<br />
A. C. & S., INC., et al.,<br />
Plaintiffs,<br />
i NO OPPOSITION<br />
! SUMMARY JUDGMENT<br />
j MOTION AND ORDER<br />
Defendants. /<br />
WHEREFORE, defendant, Karnak Corporation, hereby requests summary judgment in !<br />
the above entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules § 3212, dismissing plaintiffs’<br />
complaint against defendant, Karnak Corporation, with prejudice in this action, and there being<br />
no opposition thereto,<br />
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against<br />
defendant, Karnak Corporation, be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and<br />
without costs.<br />
Attorney for Plaintiffs<br />
Karnak Corporation<br />
Edward C. Kelley<br />
MCGWNEY & KLUGER, P.C.<br />
Weitz & Luxenberg, P.C.<br />
80 Broad Street-Suite 2300<br />
700 Broadway<br />
New York, New York 100<strong>04</strong><br />
(212) 509-3456 (212) 558-5500<br />
New York,New York 10003 F 1 L E<br />
N0038955-1<br />
APR 18 96<strong>11</strong>
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK<br />
COUNTY OF NEW YORK<br />
IN RE: NEW YORK COUNTY j NYCAL<br />
ASBESTOS LITIGATION<br />
j LAS, Part 30<br />
i (Heitler, J.)<br />
THIS DOCUMENT REFERS TO:<br />
j Index No.: 190337/10<br />
EDWARD C. KELLEY,<br />
A. C. & S., INC., et al.,<br />
Plaintiffs, / NO OPPOSITION<br />
! SUMMARY JUDGMENT<br />
-against- j MOTION AND ORDER<br />
Defendants. !<br />
WHEREFORE, defendant, Atwood & Morrill Co., Inc, hereby requests summary<br />
judgment in the above entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules 6 3212, dismissing<br />
plaintiffs' complaint against defendant, Atwood & Morrill Co., Inc, with prejudice in this action,<br />
and there being no opposition thereto,<br />
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against<br />
defendant, Atwood & Morrill Co., Inc, be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and<br />
without costs.<br />
Dated: New Yoyk, New York<br />
Laura B. Hollman, E&.<br />
Attorney for Defendant<br />
Atwood & Morrill Co., Inc<br />
MCGIVNEY & KLUGER, P.C.<br />
SO Broad Street-Suite 2300<br />
New York, New York 100<strong>04</strong><br />
(212) 509-3456<br />
Edward C. Kelley<br />
Weitz & ~uxenberg, P.C.<br />
700 Broadway<br />
New York, New York 1000<br />
Hon. Sherry Klein Heitler<br />
N003895S-1<br />
APR 15 20<strong>11</strong>
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK<br />
COUNTY OF NEW YORK<br />
IN RE: NEW YORK COUNTY<br />
i NYCAL<br />
ASBESTOS LITIGATION<br />
I.A.S. Part 30<br />
(Heitler, J.)<br />
THIS DOCUMENT REFERS TO:<br />
Index No.: 190338/10<br />
ROSALIE GENNOSA AND JOSEPH<br />
GENNOSA,<br />
NO OPPOSITION<br />
Plaintiffs, SUMMARY JUDGMENT<br />
MOTION AND ORDER<br />
-against-<br />
A. C. & S., INC., et al.,<br />
Defendants. !<br />
WHEREFORE, defendant, Aurora Pump Company, hereby requests summary judgment<br />
in the above entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules $ 3212, dismissing<br />
plaintiffs’ complaint against defendant, Aurora Pump Company, with prejudice in this action,<br />
and there being no opposition thereto,<br />
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against<br />
defendant, Aurora Pump Company, be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and<br />
without costs.<br />
Dated: New York, New York<br />
“r/7 ,20<strong>11</strong><br />
Attorney c for hark%. Plaintiffs<br />
Aurora Pump Company Rosalie Gennosa and Josep Gennosa I<br />
MCGlVNEY & KLUGER, P.C.<br />
Weitz & Luxenberg, P.C.<br />
4-<br />
Fr>k%*D ’!<br />
80 Broad Street-Suite 2300 700 Broadway APR 2 6 20’’<br />
New York, New York 100<strong>04</strong><br />
New York, New York 10003<br />
(212) 509-3456 (212) 558-5500 NEW YORK<br />
CLERKIS OFFGE‘<br />
SO ORDERED, h<br />
N0038955-1<br />
Hon. Sherry Klein Heitler<br />
1003-4 16<br />
GoUNn
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK<br />
COUNTY OF NEW YORK<br />
IN RE: NEW YORK COUNTY<br />
NYCAL<br />
ASBESTOS LITIGATION<br />
I.A.S. Part 30<br />
(Heitler, J.)<br />
THIS DOCUMENT REFERS TO:<br />
ROSALIE GENNOSA AND JOSEPH<br />
GENNOSA,<br />
-against-<br />
A. C. & S., INC., et al.,<br />
Plaintiffs,<br />
Defendants.<br />
Index No.: 190338/10<br />
NO OPPOSITION<br />
SUMMARY JUDGMENT<br />
MOTION AND ORDER<br />
WHEREFORE, defendant, Columbia Boiler, hereby requests summary judgment in the<br />
above entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules 8 3212, dismissing plaintiffs'<br />
complaint against defendant, Columbia Boiler, with prejudice in this action, and there being no<br />
opposition thereto,<br />
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against<br />
defendant, Columbia Boiler, be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and without<br />
costs.<br />
Dated: New Y rk, New York<br />
$7 ,20<strong>11</strong><br />
- - -<br />
Carol M. Tempesta, Esq.<br />
Attorney for Defendant<br />
Attorney for Plaintiffs<br />
Columbia Boiler<br />
Rosalie Gennosa and Josep<br />
MCGIVNEY & KLUGER, P.C.<br />
Weitz & Luxenberg, P.C.<br />
80 Broad Street-Suite 2300<br />
700 Broadway<br />
New York, New York 100<strong>04</strong><br />
New York, New York 10003<br />
(212) 509-3456 (212) 558-5500<br />
SO ORDERED,<br />
N0038955-1<br />
Hon. Shewy Klein Heitler<br />
kL kluw, E$%.<br />
2572-20<br />
APR 2 6 ""<br />
c%wJ<br />
pEVJ YOHK<br />
(-J~=RKS O ~ F d
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK<br />
COUNTY OF NEW YORK<br />
IN RE: NEW YORK COUNTY<br />
i NYCAL<br />
ASBESTOS LITIGATION<br />
j I.A.S. Part 30<br />
j (Heitler, J.)<br />
THIS DOCUMENT REFERS TO:<br />
j Index No,: 190338/10<br />
ROSALIE GENNOSA AND JOSEPH<br />
GENNOSA,<br />
j NO OPPOSITION<br />
Plaintiffs, i SUMMARY JUDGMENT<br />
MOTION AND ORDER<br />
-against-<br />
A. C. & S., INC., et al.,<br />
Defendants.<br />
j<br />
WHEREFORE, defendant, Oakfabco, Inc., hereby requests summary judgment in the<br />
above entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules 6 3212, dismissing plaintiffs'<br />
complaint against defendant, Oakfabco, Inc., with prejudice in this action, and there being no<br />
opposition thereto,<br />
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against<br />
defendant, Oakfabco, Inc,, be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and without<br />
costs.<br />
Attorney for Defendant<br />
Oakfabco, Inc.<br />
Attorney for Plaintiffs<br />
Rosalie Gennosa and Joseph Gennosa<br />
MCGIVNEY & KLUGER, P.C.<br />
Weitz & Luxenberg, P.C.<br />
80 Broad Street-Suite 2300 700 Broadway r<br />
New York, New York 100<strong>04</strong><br />
New York, New York 10003<br />
(212) 509-3456<br />
.I (212) 558-5500 APR 2 6 20''<br />
SO ORDERED,<br />
N003895S-1<br />
Hon. Sherr-kin<br />
Heitler<br />
-.<br />
2571-0677<br />
I3
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK<br />
COUNTY OF NEW YORK<br />
IN RE: NEW YORK COUNTY j NYCAL<br />
ASBESTOS LITIGATION<br />
j I.A.S. Part 30<br />
j (Heitler, J.)<br />
THIS DOCUMENT REFERS TO:<br />
ROSALIE GENNOSA AND JOSEPH<br />
GENNOSA,<br />
-against-<br />
A. C. & S., INC., et al.,<br />
Plaintiffs,<br />
Defendants. !<br />
j Index No.: 190338/10<br />
i NO OPPOSITION<br />
i SUMMARY JUDGMENT<br />
MOTION AND ORDER<br />
WHEREFORE, defendant, National Boiler Works, Inc,, hereby requests summary<br />
judgment in the above entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules 6 3212, dismissing<br />
plaintiffs’ complaint against defendant, National Boiler Works, Inc., with prejudice in this<br />
action, and there being no opposition thereto,<br />
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against<br />
defendant, National Boiler Works, Inc., be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and<br />
without costs.<br />
C 9Attorney for arks Plaintiffs<br />
M. rwm> EST<br />
National Boiler Works, Inc.<br />
Rosalie Gennosa and Joseph Gennosa<br />
MCGIVNEY & KLUGER, P.C.<br />
Weitz & Luxenberg, P.C.<br />
80 Broad Street-Suite 2300<br />
700 Broadway<br />
FILED<br />
New York, New York 100<strong>04</strong><br />
New York, New York 10003<br />
(212) 509-3456 (212) 558-5500<br />
1<br />
APR 2 6 20<strong>11</strong><br />
SO ORDERED,<br />
F.~ZW YORK<br />
Hon. Sherry Klein Heitler<br />
COUNTY CLERK‘S OFFICE’<br />
N0038955-1<br />
1801-0030
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK<br />
COUNTY OF NEW YORK<br />
IN RE: NEW YORK COUNTY j NYCAL<br />
ASBESTOS LITIGATION<br />
I.A.S. Part 30<br />
i (Heitler, J.)<br />
THIS DOCUMENT EFERS TO:<br />
ROSALIE GENNOSA AND JOSEPH<br />
GENNOSA,<br />
-against-<br />
A. C. & S., INC., et al.,<br />
Plaintiffs,<br />
Index No.: 190338/10<br />
NO OPPOSITION<br />
SUMMARY JUDGMENT<br />
MOTION AND ORDER<br />
Defendants.<br />
j<br />
WHEREFORE, defendant, Courter & Company, Inc., hereby requests summary<br />
judgment in the above entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules 6 3212, dismissing<br />
plaintiffs' complaint against defendant, Courter & Company, Inc., with prejudice in this action,<br />
and there being no opposition thereto,<br />
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against<br />
defendant, Courter & Company, Inc., be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and<br />
without costs.<br />
Dated: New York, New York<br />
417 ,20<strong>11</strong><br />
CkfE M. Lp.S%, E.%.<br />
Attorney for Plaintiffs<br />
Rosalie Gennosa and Joseph Gennosa<br />
MCGIVNEY & KLUGER, P.C.<br />
Weitz & Luxenberg, P.C.<br />
SO Broad Street-Suite 2300<br />
700 Broadway<br />
New York, New York 100<strong>04</strong><br />
New York, New York 10<br />
(212) 509-3456 (212) 558-5500<br />
SO ORDERED, A<br />
Hon. Sherry Klein Heitler<br />
<strong>11</strong>223iiwP<br />
LpR 2 6
ROSALIE GENNOSA and JOSEPH<br />
GENNOSA,<br />
-against-<br />
Plaintiff( s),<br />
A.O. SMITH WATER PRODUCTS, et al.,<br />
: NYCAL<br />
: I.A.S. Part30<br />
: (Hon. Sherry Klein Heitler)<br />
: Index No.: 190338-10<br />
: NO-OPPOSITION SUMMARY<br />
: JUDGMENT MOTION AND ORDER<br />
and Crane Co., improperly sued as “PACIFIC VALVES, Individually and as a subsidiary of<br />
Crane Co.,” (hereinafter “CRANE CO.”), hereby requests summary judgment in the aboveentitled<br />
case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212, dismissing plaintiffs’<br />
complaint against defendant CRANE CO. with prejudice, and there being no opposition thereto,<br />
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against<br />
defendant CRANE CO. be, and the same are hereby, dismissed with prejudice and Without costs.<br />
Dated:<br />
a k<br />
Attorneys for Plaintiff(s)<br />
700 Broadway<br />
New York, NY 10003<br />
(212) 558-5500<br />
for Defendant<br />
ED<br />
APR 2 6 20<strong>11</strong><br />
SO ORDERED,<br />
NY-857883 vl
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK<br />
COUNTY OF NEW YORK<br />
IN RE: NEW YORK COUNTY i NYCAL<br />
ASBESTOS LITIGATION<br />
j I.A,S, Part 30<br />
i (Heitler, J.)<br />
THIS DOCUMENT REFERS TO:<br />
JOSEPH GENNOSA AND ROSALIE<br />
GENNOSA,<br />
-against-<br />
A. C. & S., INC., et al.,<br />
Plaintiffs,<br />
Defendants. !<br />
i Index No.: 190340/10<br />
[ NO OPPOSITION<br />
! SUMMARY JUDGMENT<br />
i MOTION AND ORDER<br />
WHEREFORE, defendant, Columbia Boiler, hereby requests summary judgment in the<br />
above entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules 6 3212, dismissing plaintiffs'<br />
complaint against defendant, Columbia Boiler, with prejudice in this action, and there being no<br />
opposition thereto,<br />
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against<br />
defendant, Columbia Boiler, be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and without<br />
Dated: New York, New York<br />
41-1 7 201 1<br />
I<br />
Carol M. Tempesta, Esq.<br />
Attorney for Defendant<br />
Columbia Boiler<br />
MCGIVNEY & KLUGER, P.C.<br />
80 Broad Street-Suite 2300<br />
New York, New York 100<strong>04</strong><br />
(212) 509-3456<br />
SO ORDERED,<br />
chsrla M. ~3.<br />
Attorney for Plaintiffs<br />
Joseph Gennosa and Rosalie Gennosa<br />
Weitz & Luxenberg, P.C.<br />
700 Broadway<br />
New York, New York 100 FILED,<br />
(212) 558-5500<br />
,Q&NTY<br />
APR 2 6 20<strong>11</strong><br />
h'FW YBI-7.K<br />
CLERKS OFFICE'<br />
N0038955-1
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK<br />
COUNTY OF NEW YORK<br />
IN RE: NEW YORK COUNTY<br />
! NYCAL<br />
ASBESTOS LITIGATION<br />
______<br />
THIS DOCUMENT REFERS TO:<br />
JOSEPH GENNOSA AND ROSALIE<br />
GENNOSA,<br />
-against-<br />
A. C. & S., INC., et al.,<br />
P1aint i ffs ,<br />
I.A.S. Part 30<br />
(Heitler, J.)<br />
Index No,: 190340/10<br />
NO OPPOSITION<br />
SUMMARY JUDGMENT<br />
MOTION AND ORDER<br />
Defendants.<br />
i<br />
WHEREFORE, defendant, Oakfabco, Inc., hereby requests summary judgment in the<br />
above entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules 6 3212, dismissing plaintiffs'<br />
complaint against defendant, Oakfabco, Inc., with prejudice in this action, and there being no<br />
opposition thereto,<br />
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against<br />
defendant, Oakfabco, Inc., be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and without<br />
costs.<br />
Dated: New York, New York<br />
Chk V.<br />
Attorney for Defendant<br />
Oakfabco, Inc.<br />
MCGIVNEY & KLUGER, P.C.<br />
80 Broad Street-Suite 2300<br />
New York, New York 100<strong>04</strong><br />
(212) 509-3456 (212) 558-5500<br />
SO ORDERED,<br />
N0038955-1<br />
Won. Sherry Klein Heitler<br />
Fe+t~m, E%*<br />
Attorney for Plaintiffs<br />
Joseph Gennosa and Rosalie Gennosa<br />
Weitz & Luxenberg, P.C.<br />
700 Broadway<br />
New York, New York 10 EILED<br />
APR 2 6 20<strong>11</strong><br />
hJFllV YORK<br />
ra~bk~ CLERK'S OFFICE'
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK<br />
COUNTY OF NEW YORK<br />
IN RE: NEW YORK COUNTY j NYCAL<br />
ASBESTOS LITIGATION<br />
j I.A.S. Part 30<br />
i (Heitler, J.)<br />
THIS DOCUMENT REFERS TO:<br />
j Index No.: 190340/10<br />
JOSEPH GENNOSA AND ROSALIE<br />
GENNOSA,<br />
i NO OPPOSITION<br />
Plaintiffs, j SUMMARY JUDGMENT<br />
i MOTION AND ORDER<br />
-against-<br />
A. C. & S., INC., et al.,<br />
Defendants.<br />
j<br />
WHEREFORE, defendant, National Boiler Works, Inc., hereby requests summary<br />
judgment in the above entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules 6 3212, dismissing<br />
plaintiffs’ complaint against defendant, National Boiler Works, Inc., with prejudice in this<br />
action, and there being no opposition thereto,<br />
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against<br />
defendant, National Boiler Works, Inc., be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and<br />
without costs.<br />
Dated: New,York, New York<br />
917 ,20<strong>11</strong><br />
Attorney for Defendant I<br />
National Boiler Works, Inc.<br />
MCGIVNEY & KLUGER, P.C.<br />
80 Broad Street-Suite 2300<br />
New York, New York 100<strong>04</strong><br />
(212) 509-3456 (212) 558-5500 1<br />
Attorney for Plaintiffs<br />
Joseph Gennosa and Rosalie Gennosa<br />
Weitz & Luxenberg, P.C.<br />
700 Broadway<br />
New York, New York 10003 F I L E D<br />
‘<br />
t<br />
SO ORDERED,<br />
N0038955-1<br />
4pR 2 6 20<strong>11</strong><br />
Ff/c~’
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK<br />
COUNTY OF NEW YORK<br />
IN RE: NEW YOFX COUNTY j NYCAL<br />
ASBESTOS LITIGATION<br />
j I.A.S. Part 30<br />
i (Heitler, J.)<br />
THIS DOCUMENT REFERS TO:<br />
j Index No.: 190340/10<br />
JOSEPH GENNOSA AND ROSALIE<br />
GENNOSA,<br />
i NO OPPOSITION<br />
Plaintiffs, j SUMMARY JUDGMENT<br />
i MOTION AND ORDER<br />
-against-<br />
A. C. & S., INC., et al.,<br />
Defendants.<br />
j<br />
WHEREFORE, defendant, Courter & Company, Inc., hereby requests summary<br />
judgment in the above entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules 0 3212, dismissing<br />
plaintiffs' complaint against defendant, Courter & Company, Inc., with prejudice in this action,<br />
and there being no opposition thereto,<br />
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against<br />
defendant, Courter & Company, Inc., be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and<br />
without costs.<br />
\<br />
Attorney<br />
c for G fPlaintiffs<br />
k M.<br />
Joseph Gennosa and Rosalie Gennosa<br />
Weitz & Luxenberg, P.C.<br />
80 Broad Street-Suite 2300 700 Broadway B1"t:<br />
New York, New York 100<strong>04</strong><br />
New York, New York<br />
(212) 509-3456 (212) 558-5500<br />
A@!'*2 6 20<strong>11</strong><br />
SO ORDERED,<br />
4! YORK<br />
Hon. Sherry Klein Heitler C ERKS OFFICE:'<br />
N0038955-1<br />
APR 1320<strong>11</strong>
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK<br />
COUNTY OF NEW YORK<br />
IN RE: NEW YORK COUNTY<br />
ASBESTOS LITIGATION<br />
! NYCAL<br />
j I.A.S. Part 30<br />
i (Heitler, J.)<br />
THIS DOCUMENT REFERS TO:<br />
i Index No,: 190340/10<br />
JOSEPH GENNOSA AND ROSALIE<br />
GENNOSA,<br />
i NO OPPOSITION<br />
Plaintiffs, j SUMMARY JUDGMENT<br />
i MOTION AND ORDER<br />
-against-<br />
A. C. & S., NC., et al.,<br />
Defendants.<br />
j<br />
WHEREFORE, defendant, Aurora Pump Company, hereby requests summary judgment<br />
in the above entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules 6 3212, dismissing<br />
plaintiffs’ complaint against defendant, Aurora Pump Company, with prejudice in this action,<br />
and there being no opposition thereto,<br />
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against<br />
defendant, Aurora Pump Company, be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and<br />
without costs.<br />
Dated: New York, New York<br />
,20<strong>11</strong><br />
Attorney for Plaintiffs<br />
Aurora Pump Company<br />
Joseph Gennosa and Rosalie Gennosa<br />
MCGIVNEY & KLTJGER, P.C.<br />
Weitz & Luxenberg, P.C.<br />
80 Broad Street-Suite 2300<br />
700 Broadway<br />
New York, New York 100<strong>04</strong><br />
New York, New York 10 3<br />
(212) 509-3456 (212) 558-5500<br />
ARR 2 6 20<strong>11</strong><br />
FILED<br />
SO ORDERED,<br />
Hon. Sherrywn Heitler<br />
b!EW YORK<br />
CLERK’S OFFtE’<br />
N0038955-1<br />
APR 1520<strong>11</strong>
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK<br />
COUNTY OF NEW YORK<br />
IN RE: NEW YORK COUNTY j NYCAL<br />
ASBESTOS LITIGATION<br />
i I.A.S. Part 30<br />
! (Heitler, J.)<br />
THIS DOCUMENT REFERS TO:<br />
JAMES A. HAZELL AND STEFAN1 HAZELL,<br />
j Index No.: 190341/10<br />
!<br />
-against-<br />
Plaintiffs, i NO OPPOSITION<br />
j SUMMARY JUDGMENT<br />
[ MOTION AND ORDER<br />
A. C. & S., INC., et al.,<br />
Defendants. !<br />
WHEREFORE, defendant, Kentile Floors, Inc., hereby requests summary judgment in<br />
the above entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules 0 3212, dismissing plaintiffs’<br />
complaint against defendant, Kentile Floors, Inc., with prejudice in this action, and there being<br />
no opposition thereto,<br />
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against<br />
defendant, Kentile Floors, Inc., be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and without<br />
costs.<br />
c<br />
Carol M. Tempesta, Esq.<br />
Attorney for Defendant<br />
Kentile Floors, Inc.<br />
MCGIVNEY & KLUGER, P.C.<br />
80 Broad Street-Suite 2300<br />
New York, New York 100<strong>04</strong><br />
(2 12) 509-3456 (212) 558-5500<br />
James A. Hazell and Stefani Hazell<br />
Weitz & Luxenberg, P.C.<br />
700 Broadway<br />
New York, New York 10003<br />
N0038955-1
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK<br />
COUNTY OF NEW YORK<br />
IN RE: NEW YORK CITY ASBESTOS LITIGATION<br />
__-"_frll_______----_--------------------"-------"-~~-------------<br />
This Document Relates To:<br />
: NYCAL<br />
JAMES A. HAZELL and STEFAN1 HAZELL, : I.A.S. Part 30<br />
: (Hon. Sherry Klein Heitler)<br />
Plaintiff(s),<br />
: IndexNo.: 190341-10<br />
-against-<br />
: NO-OPPOSITION SUMMARY<br />
CBS CORPORATION, et al.,<br />
: JUDGMENT MOTION AND<br />
: ORDER<br />
Defendants.<br />
X<br />
WHEREFORE, defendant CRANE CO. hereby requests summary judgment in the<br />
above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212, dismissing<br />
I<br />
plaintiffs' complaint against defendant CRANE CO. with prejudice, and there being no<br />
opposition thereto,<br />
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against<br />
defendant CRANE CO. be, and the same are hereby, dismissed with prejudice and without costs<br />
@*; 2: 6 2@It<br />
700 Broadway<br />
CRANE CO.<br />
New York, NY 10003<br />
599 Lexington Avenue<br />
YOBK Of F d<br />
(212) 558-5500 New York, NY 10022 &WS<br />
(212) 536-3900<br />
.-<br />
SO ORDERED,
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK<br />
COUNTY OF NEW YORK<br />
IN RE: NEW YORK COUNTY j NYCAL<br />
ASBESTOS LITIGATION<br />
j I.A.S. Part 30<br />
: (Heitler, J.)<br />
THIS DOCUMENT REFERS TO:<br />
BERNARD D'AQUILA AND MARY ANN<br />
D'AQUILA,<br />
-against-<br />
A. C. & S., INC., el al.,<br />
Plaintiffs,<br />
j Index No.: 190343/10<br />
i NO OPPOSITION<br />
! SUMMARY JUDGMENT<br />
j MOTION AND ORDER<br />
Defendants.<br />
j<br />
WHEREFORE, defendant, Treadwell Corporation, hereby requests summary judgment in<br />
the above entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules 0 3212, dismissing plaintiffs'<br />
complaint against defendant, Treadwell Corporation, with prejudice in this action, and there<br />
being no opposition thereto,<br />
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against<br />
defendant, Treadwell Corporation, be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and<br />
without costs.<br />
Dated: New Nork. New York<br />
q7 ' ,20<strong>11</strong><br />
Michele J. MittlernLn, Esq.<br />
Attorney for Defendant<br />
Treadwell Corporation<br />
MCGIVNEY & KLUGER, P.C.<br />
80 Broad Street-Suite 2300<br />
New York, New York 100<strong>04</strong><br />
(212) 509-3456<br />
700 Broadway<br />
New York, New York 10003 @ 2<br />
SO ORDERED,<br />
1235-23412<br />
N0038955-1<br />
APR 15 20<strong>11</strong>
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK<br />
COUNTY OF NEW YORK<br />
IN RE: NEW YORK COUNTY<br />
! NYCAL<br />
ASBESTOS LITIGATION<br />
j I.A.S. Part 30<br />
i (Heitler, J.)<br />
THIS DOCUMENT REFERS TO:<br />
j Index No.: 190343/10<br />
BERNARD D'AQUILA AND MARY ANN<br />
D'AQUILA,<br />
i NO OPPOSITION<br />
Plaintiffs, i SUMMARY JUDGMENT<br />
-againstj<br />
MOTION AND ORDER<br />
A. C. & S., INC., et al.,<br />
Defendants.<br />
j<br />
WHEREFORE, defendant, Courter & Company, Inc., hereby requests summary<br />
judgment in the above entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules 8 3212, dismissing<br />
plaintiffs' complaint against defendant, Courter & Company, Inc., with prejudice in this action,<br />
and there being no opposition thereto,<br />
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against<br />
defendant, Courter & Company, Inc., be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and<br />
without costs.<br />
Dated: New ork, New York<br />
rh ,20<strong>11</strong><br />
pn:m;c.-<br />
Chfk H.-FeguSDn,E&t.<br />
@tomey for Attorney for Plaintiffs<br />
ourter & Co<br />
Bernard DAquila and<br />
MCGIVNEY & UGER, P.C. Weitz & Luxenberg, P.C.<br />
80 Broad Street-Suite 2300<br />
700 Broadway<br />
New York, New York I00<strong>04</strong><br />
New York, New York 10003<br />
(212) 509-3456 (212) 558-5500<br />
SO ORDERED,<br />
of e<br />
<strong>11</strong>22-23791<br />
N003895S-1
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK<br />
COUNTY OF NEW YORK<br />
IN RE: NEW YORK COUNTY i NYCAL<br />
ASBESTOS LITIGATION<br />
j I.A.S. Part 30<br />
! (Heitler, J.)<br />
THIS DOCUMENT REFERS TO:<br />
j Index No.: 190344/10<br />
RONALD HANZE AND CAROL HANZE,<br />
Plaintiffs, / NO OPPOSITION<br />
i SUMMARY JUDGMENT<br />
-against- / MOTION AND ORDER<br />
A. C. & S., mC., et d.,<br />
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK<br />
COUNTY OF NEW YON<br />
IN RE: NEW YORK COUNTY j NYCAL<br />
ASBESTOS LITIGATION<br />
j I.A.S. Part 30<br />
i (Heitler, J.)<br />
THIS DOCUMENT REFERS TO:<br />
j Index No.: 190351/10<br />
ANTHONY CORINO AND ANTOINETTE<br />
CORINO,<br />
i NO OPPOSITION<br />
Plaintiffs, j SUMMARY JUDGMENT<br />
j MOTION AND ORDER<br />
-against-<br />
A. C. & S., INC., et al.,<br />
Defendants.<br />
j<br />
WHEREFORE, defendant, Oakfabco, Inc., hereby requests summary judgment in the<br />
above entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules 5 3212, dismissing plaintiffs’<br />
complaint against defendant, Oakfabco, Inc., with prejudice in this action, and there being no<br />
opposition thereto,<br />
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against<br />
defendant, Oakfabco, Inc., be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and without<br />
costs.<br />
- - E;+-.<br />
R&ert Darish, Esq. qw, -5<br />
Attorney for Defendant<br />
Oakfabco, Inc.<br />
MCGIVNEY & KLUGER, P.C.<br />
SO Broad Street-Suite 2300<br />
New York, New York 100<strong>04</strong><br />
(212) 509-3456<br />
vE”z€<br />
Attorney for Plaintiffs<br />
Anthony Corino and Antoi<br />
Weitz & Luxenberg, P.C. D<br />
700 Broadway<br />
New York, New York 10003<br />
ApR 2 6 lo”<br />
SO ORDERED,<br />
NEW YORK<br />
CLERKS OFF‘€<br />
couNn<br />
N003895S-1
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK<br />
COUNTY OF NEW YORK<br />
IN RE: NEW YORK COUNTY j NYCAL<br />
ASBESTOS LITIGATION<br />
j I.A.S. Part 30<br />
i (Heitler, J.)<br />
THIS DOCUMENT REFERS TO:<br />
j Index No.: 190357/10<br />
GIULIO LOCCISANO,<br />
-against-<br />
A. C, & S,, INC, et al.,<br />
Plaintiffs,<br />
Defendants.<br />
i NO OPPOSITION<br />
SUMMARY JUDGMENT<br />
i MOTION AND ORDER<br />
WHEREFORE, defendant, Kentile Floors, Inc., hereby requests summary judgment in<br />
the above entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules 6 3212, dismissing plaintiffs'<br />
complaint against defendant, Kentile Floors, Inc., with prejudice in this action, and there being<br />
no opposition thereto,<br />
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against<br />
defendant, Kentile Floors, Inc., be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and without<br />
costs.<br />
Dated: New York New York<br />
41; ,20<strong>11</strong><br />
-\<br />
Carol M. Ternpesta, Esq.<br />
Attorney for Defendant<br />
Kentile Floors, Inc.<br />
MCGWY & KLUGER, P.C.<br />
80 Broad Street-Suite 2300<br />
New York, New York 100<strong>04</strong><br />
(212) 509-3456<br />
Ch/es-t+<br />
kp,, ,b$.<br />
Attorney for Plaintiffs<br />
Giulio Loccisano<br />
Weitz & Luxenberg, P.C.<br />
700 Broadway<br />
New York, New York 10003 FILED<br />
(212) 558-5500<br />
APR 2 6 20<strong>11</strong><br />
SO ORDERED,<br />
N0038955-1<br />
Hon. Sherry Klein Heitler<br />
2082-10351<br />
biFW YORK<br />
COUNTY CLERKS OFFICE'
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK<br />
COUNTY OF NEW YORK<br />
IN RE: NEW YORK COUNTY<br />
NYCAL<br />
ASBESTOS LITIGATION<br />
1,A.S. Part 30<br />
(Heitler, J.)<br />
THIS DOCUMENT REFERS TO:<br />
Index No.: 190357/10<br />
GIULIO LOCCISANO,<br />
-against-<br />
A. C. & S., INC., et al.,<br />
Plaintiffs,<br />
Defendants.<br />
NO OPPOSITION<br />
SUMMARY JUDGMENT<br />
MOTION AND ORDER<br />
WHEREFORE, defendant, Patterson Pump Co., hereby requests summary judgment in<br />
the above entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules 6 3212, dismissing plaintiffs’<br />
complaint against defendant, Patterson Pump Co., with prejudice in this action, and there being<br />
no opposition thereto,<br />
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against<br />
defendant, Patterson Pump Co., be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and without<br />
costs.<br />
Dated: New York New York<br />
4<strong>11</strong>’ ,20<strong>11</strong> I.<br />
Patterson Pump Co.<br />
MCGIVNEY & KLUGER, P.C.<br />
80 Broad Street-Suite 2300<br />
New York, New York 100<strong>04</strong><br />
(212) 509-3456<br />
Giulio Loccisano<br />
Weitz & Luxenberg, P.C.<br />
700 Broadway<br />
New York, New York 10003<br />
(212) 558-5500<br />
SO ORDERED,<br />
N0038955-1<br />
Hon. Sherry Klein Heitler<br />
454-12065
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK<br />
COUNTY OF NEW YORK<br />
IN RE: NEW YORK COUNTY j NYCAL<br />
ASBESTOS LITIGATION<br />
j I.A.S. Part 30<br />
! (Heitler, J.)<br />
THIS DOCUMENT REFERS TO:<br />
i Index No.: 190357/10<br />
GIULIO LOCCISANO,<br />
A. C. & S., INC., et al.,<br />
Plaintiffs, i NO OPPOSITION<br />
j SUMMARY JUDGMENT<br />
-against- j MOTION AND ORDER<br />
Defendants. !<br />
WHEREFORE, defendant, The Fairbanks Company, hereby requests summary judgment<br />
in the above entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules 6 3212, dismissing<br />
plaintiffs' complaint against defendant, The Fairbanks Company, with prejudice in this action,<br />
and there being no opposition thereto,<br />
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against<br />
defendant, The Fairbanks Company, be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and<br />
without costs.<br />
Dated: New York, New York<br />
417 ,20<strong>11</strong><br />
OkGedeo Attorney for N. Defendant Okoh, Esq.<br />
The Fairbanks Company<br />
MCGIVNEY & KLUGER, P.C.<br />
80 Broad Street-Suite 2300<br />
New York, New York 100<strong>04</strong><br />
(212) 509-3456<br />
1Attorney for Plaintiffs<br />
Giulio Loccisano<br />
Weitz & Luxenberg, P.C.<br />
700 Broadway<br />
New York, New York 100<br />
(212) 558-5500<br />
I<br />
SO ORDERED, - -<br />
Hon. Sherry Klein Heitler<br />
N0038955-1
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK<br />
COUNTY OF NEW YORK<br />
IN RE: NEW YORK COUNTY<br />
j NYCAL<br />
ASBESTOS LITIGATION<br />
j I.A.S. Part 30<br />
j (Heitler, J.)<br />
THIS DOCUMENT REFERS TO:<br />
j Index No.: 190358/10<br />
ARTHUR J, MEDIATE AND HARRIET<br />
MEDIATE,<br />
i NO OPPOSITION<br />
Plaintiffs, j SUMMARY JUDGMENT<br />
MOTION AND ORDER<br />
-against-<br />
A. C. & S., INC., et al.,<br />
Defendants.<br />
j<br />
WHEREFORE, defendant, Tishman Liquidating Corp., hereby requests summary<br />
judgment in the above entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules 5 3212, dismissing<br />
plaintiffs’ complaint against defendant, Tishman Liquidating Corp., with prejudice in this action,<br />
and there being no opposition thereto,<br />
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against<br />
defendant, Tishman Liquidating Corp., be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and<br />
without costs.<br />
Dated: New York, New York<br />
r/7 ,20<strong>11</strong><br />
MCGIVNEY & KLUGER, P.C.<br />
80 Broad Street-Suite 2300<br />
New York, New York 100<strong>04</strong><br />
(212) 509-3456<br />
n<br />
e<br />
dmh rZ. %o.l, E+.<br />
dmh rZ. %o.l, E+.<br />
Attorney for Plaintiffs<br />
Arthur J. Mediate and Harriet Mediate<br />
Weitz & Luxenberg, P.C.<br />
700 Broadway<br />
New York, New York 1000<br />
(212) 558-5500<br />
APR 2 6 20<strong>11</strong><br />
N0038955-1
I<br />
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK<br />
COUNTY OF NEW YORK<br />
IN RE: NEW YORK COUNTY j NYCAL<br />
ASBESTOS LITIGATION<br />
j I.A.S. Part 30<br />
! (Heitler, J.)<br />
THIS DOCUMENT REFERS TO:<br />
ARTHUR J. MEDIATE AND HARRIET<br />
MEDIATE,<br />
-against-<br />
A. C. & S., INC., et al.,<br />
Plaintiffs,<br />
j Index No.: 190358/10<br />
i NO OPPOSITION<br />
! SUMMARY JUDGMENT<br />
j MOTION AND ORDER<br />
Defendants,<br />
i<br />
WHEREFORE, defendant, Safeguard Industrial Equipment Co., hereby requests<br />
summary judgment in the above entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules 6 3212,<br />
dismissing plaintiffs’ complaint against defendant, Safeguard Industrial Equipment Co,, with<br />
prejudice in this action, and there being no opposition thereto,<br />
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against<br />
defendant, Safeguard Industrial Equipment Co., be and the same are hereby dismissed with<br />
prejudice and without costs.<br />
Dated: New York New York<br />
yI7 , ,20<strong>11</strong><br />
Attorney for Defendant<br />
Safeguard Industrial Equipment Co.<br />
MCGIVNEY & KLUGER, P.C.<br />
80 Broad Street-Suite 2300<br />
New York, New York 100<strong>04</strong><br />
(212) 509-3456<br />
Fq~wq ESP<br />
ChGAtS N..<br />
Attorney for Plaintiffs<br />
Arthur J. Mediate and Harriet Mediate<br />
Weitz & Luxenberg, P.C.<br />
700 Broadway<br />
New York, New York 1000<br />
(2 12) 558-5500<br />
N0038955-1
SUPEME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK<br />
COUNTY OF NEW YORK<br />
IN RE: NEW YORK COUNTY<br />
NYCAL<br />
ASBESTOS LITIGATION<br />
I.A.S. Part 30<br />
(Heitler, J.)<br />
THIS DOCUMENT REFERS TO:<br />
ARTHUR J. MEDIATE AND HARRIET<br />
MEDIATE,<br />
-against-<br />
A. C. & S., INC., et al.,<br />
Plaintiffs,<br />
Defendants.<br />
Index No,: 190358/10<br />
NO OPPOSITION<br />
SUMMARY JUDGMENT<br />
MOTION AND ORDER<br />
WHEREFORE, defendant, Oakfabco, Inc., hereby requests summary judgment in the<br />
above entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules $ 3212, dismissing plaintiffs'<br />
complaint against defendant, Oakfabco, Inc., with prejudice in this action, and there being no<br />
opposition thereto,<br />
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against<br />
defendant, Oakfabco, Inc., be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and without<br />
costs.<br />
Dated: New Y rk, New York<br />
q7 ,20<strong>11</strong><br />
-<br />
-<br />
Roiert Darish, Esq.<br />
Attorney for Defendant<br />
Oakfabco, Inc.<br />
MCGIVNEY & KLUGER, P.C.<br />
80 Broad Street-Suite 2300<br />
New York, New York 100<strong>04</strong><br />
(212) 509-3456<br />
n<br />
ChdK b.1: k54SD7, E?.<br />
Attorney for Plaintiffs<br />
Arthur J. Mediate and Harriet Mediate<br />
Weitz & Luxenberg, P.C.<br />
700 Broadway FILED<br />
New York, New York 10003<br />
(212) 558-5500<br />
APR 2 6 2o1'<br />
SO ORDERED, \<br />
Hon. Sherry Klein Heitler<br />
2571-0771<br />
N00389SS-I
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK<br />
COUNTY OF NEW YORK<br />
IN RE: NEW YORK COUNTY j NYCAL<br />
ASBESTOS LITIGATION<br />
j I.A.S. Part 30<br />
i (Heitler, J.)<br />
THIS DOCUMENT REFERS TO:<br />
i Index No.: 190358/10<br />
ARTHUR J. MEDIATE AND HARRIET<br />
MEDIATE,<br />
/ NO OPPOSITION<br />
Plaintiffs, j SUMMARY JUDGMENT<br />
i MOTION AND ORDER<br />
-against-<br />
A, C. & S., INC., et al.,<br />
Defendants.<br />
j<br />
WHEREFORE, defendant, Kentile Floors, Inc., hereby requests summary judgment in<br />
the above entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules 5 3212, dismissing plaintiffs’<br />
complaint against defendant, Kentile Floors, Inc., with prejudice in this action, and there being<br />
no opposition thereto,<br />
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against<br />
defendant, Kentile Floors, Inc., be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and without<br />
costs.<br />
Dated: New York, New York<br />
y/7 ,20<strong>11</strong><br />
Attorney Carol M. for Tempesta, Defendant Esq.<br />
Kentile Floors, Inc.<br />
MCGIVNEY & KLUGER, P.C.<br />
80 Broad Street-Suite 2300<br />
New York, New York 100<strong>04</strong><br />
(212) 509-3456<br />
7Attorney for Plaintiffs<br />
Arthur J. Mediate and Harriet Mediate<br />
Weitz & Luxenberg, P.C.<br />
New 700 Broadway York, New York 10003<br />
(212) 558-5500<br />
!LED<br />
~ P R 2 6 20<strong>11</strong><br />
SO ORDERED,<br />
N00389SS-1<br />
zosz-r@<br />
>!€$,I YORK<br />
,,N’py CLERKS OFFid
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK<br />
COUNTY OF NEW YORK<br />
IN RE: NEW YORK COUNTY<br />
! NYCAL<br />
ASBESTOS LITIGATION<br />
j I.A.S. Part 30<br />
! (Heitler, J.)<br />
THIS DOCUMENT REFERS TO:<br />
Index No.: 190358/10<br />
ARTHUR J. MEDIATE AND HARRIET<br />
MEDIATE,<br />
NO OPPOSITION<br />
Plaintiffs, SUMMARY JUDGMENT<br />
MOTION AND ORDER<br />
-against-<br />
A. C. & S., INC., et al.,<br />
Defendants.<br />
WHEREFORE, defendant, Treadwell Corporation, hereby requests summary judgment in<br />
the above entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules 6 3212, dismissing plaintiffs’<br />
complaint against defendant, Treadwell Corporation, with prejudice in this action, and there<br />
being no opposition thereto,<br />
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against<br />
defendant, Treadwell Corporation, be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and<br />
without costs.<br />
-4--<br />
Dated: New Y rk, New York<br />
,20<strong>11</strong><br />
Chd3 M. kpw, ‘s9.<br />
Attorney for Defendant<br />
Attorney for Plaintiffs<br />
Treadwell Corporation<br />
Arthur J. Mediate and Harriet Mediate<br />
MCGIVNEY & KLUGER, P.C.<br />
Weitz & Luxenberg, P.C.<br />
80 Broad Street-Suite 2300<br />
700 Broadway<br />
New York, New York 100<strong>04</strong><br />
New York, New York 100<br />
(212) 509-3456 (212) 558-5500<br />
FILED<br />
SO ORDERED,<br />
Hon, Sherry Klein Heitler<br />
ApR 2 6 20’’<br />
N0038955-1
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK<br />
COUNTY OF NEW YORK<br />
IN RE: NEW YON COUNTY \ NYCAL<br />
ASBESTOS LITIGATION<br />
I.A.S. Part 30<br />
(Heitler, J.)<br />
THIS DOCUMENT REFERS TO:<br />
ARTHUR J. MEDIATE AND HARRIET<br />
MEDIATE,<br />
-against-<br />
A. C. & S., INC,, et al.,<br />
Plaintiffs,<br />
Defendants.<br />
Index No.: 190358/10<br />
NO OPPOSITION<br />
SUMMARY JUDGMENT<br />
MOTION AND ORDER<br />
WHEREFORE7 defendant, Karnak Corporation, hereby requests summary judgment in<br />
the above entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules 4 3212, dismissing plaintiffs’<br />
complaint against defendant, Karnak Corporation, with prejudice in this action, and there being<br />
no opposition thereto,<br />
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against<br />
defendant, Karnak Corporation, be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and<br />
without costs.<br />
Dated: New York, New York<br />
yI, ,20<strong>11</strong><br />
b<br />
Attorney for Defendant<br />
Karnak Corporation<br />
MCGIVNEY & KLUGER, P.C.<br />
80 Broad Street-Suite 2300<br />
New York, New York 100<strong>04</strong><br />
Attorney for Plaintiffs<br />
Arthur 1. Mediate and Harriet Mediate<br />
Weitz & Luxenberg, P.C.<br />
700 Broadway<br />
New York, New York 10003<br />
N0038955-1<br />
78 1 -0038
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK<br />
COUNTY OF NEW YORK<br />
IN RE: NEW YORK COUNTY j NYCAL<br />
ASBESTOS LI'TIGATION<br />
j I.A.S. Part 30<br />
j (Heitler, J.)<br />
THIS DOCUMENT REFERS TO:<br />
; Index No.: 190358/10<br />
ARTHUR J. MEDIATE AND HARRIET<br />
MEDIATE,<br />
i NO OPPOSITION<br />
Plaintiffs, j SUMMARY JUDGMENT<br />
j MOTION AND ORDER<br />
-against-<br />
A. C. & S., INC., et ul.,<br />
Defendants. !<br />
WHEREFORE7 defendant, Patterson Pump Co., hereby requests summary judgment in<br />
the above entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules 0 3212, dismissing plaintiffs'<br />
complaint against defendant, Patterson Pump Co., with prejudice in this action, and there being<br />
no opposition thereto,<br />
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against<br />
defendant, Patterson Pump Co., be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and without<br />
costs.<br />
Dated: New Y rk, New York<br />
f7 ,20<strong>11</strong><br />
Patterson Pump Co.<br />
MCGIVNEY & KLUGER, P.C.<br />
80 Broad Street-Suite 2300<br />
New York, New York 100<strong>04</strong><br />
(2 12) 509-3456<br />
Attorney for Plaintiffs<br />
Arthur J. Mediate and<br />
Weitz & Luxenberg, P.C.<br />
700 Broadway<br />
New York, New York 10003<br />
(212) 558-5500 hpR 2 6 20<strong>11</strong><br />
454-9409<br />
NO03895 S- 1
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK<br />
COUNTY OF NEW YORK<br />
IN RE: NEW YORK COUNTY i NYCAL<br />
ASBESTOS LITIGATION<br />
j I.A.S. Part 30<br />
i (Heitler, J.)<br />
THIS DOCUMENT REFERS TO:<br />
ARTHUR J. MEDIATE AND HARRIET<br />
MEDIATE,<br />
-against-<br />
A. C. & S., INC., et al.,<br />
Plaintiffs,<br />
j Index No.: 190358/10<br />
i<br />
NO OPPOSITION<br />
i SUMMARY JUDGMENT<br />
j MOTION AND ORDER<br />
Defendants,<br />
j<br />
WHEREFORE, defendant, Courter & Company, Inc., hereby requests summary<br />
judgment in the above entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules § 3212, dismissing<br />
plaintiffs' complaint against defendant, Courter & Company, Inc., with prejudice in this action,<br />
and there being no opposition thereto,<br />
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against<br />
defendant, Courter & Company, Inc., be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and<br />
without costs.<br />
MCGIVNEY & KLUGER, P.C.<br />
80 Broad Street-Suite 2300<br />
New York, New York 100<strong>04</strong><br />
(212) 509-3456<br />
SO ORDERED,<br />
Chad6 &1*<br />
kpm, k>.<br />
Attorney for Plaintiffs<br />
Arthur J. Mediate and Harriet Mediate<br />
Weitz & Luxenberg, P.C.<br />
700 Broadway<br />
New York, New York 10<br />
(212) 558-5500<br />
APR 2 6 20'1<br />
NEN YOHK<br />
myp CLERKS OFFICk<br />
1 9<br />
N0038955-1
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK<br />
COUNTY OF NEW YORK<br />
IN RE: NEW YORK COUNTY j NYCAL<br />
ASBESTOS LITIGATION<br />
j I.A.S. Part 30<br />
: (Heitler, J.)<br />
THIS DOCUMENT REFERS TO:<br />
j Index No.: 190365/10<br />
DOUGLAS J. WOOLSEY, AS PROPOSED<br />
ADMINISTRATOR FOR THE ESTATE OF<br />
RAYMOND E. WOOLSEY, AND EDNA C.<br />
WOOLSEY, INDIVIDUALLY,<br />
i NO OPPOSITION<br />
j SUMMARY JUDGMENT<br />
Plaintiffs,<br />
j MOTION AND ORDER<br />
-against-<br />
A. C. & S., INC., et al.,<br />
Defendants.<br />
j<br />
WHEREFORE, defendant, Aurora Pump Company, hereby requests summary judgment<br />
in the above entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules 8 3212, dismissing<br />
plaintiffs' complaint against defendant, Aurora Pump Company, with prejudice in this action,<br />
and there being no opposition thereto,<br />
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against<br />
defendant, Aurora Pump Company, be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and<br />
without costs.<br />
Dated: New York. New York -<br />
'Michelle D. Grady, Esq.<br />
Attorney for Defendant<br />
Aurora Pump Company<br />
MCGIVNEY & KLUGER, P.C.<br />
80 Broad Street-Suite 2300<br />
New York, New York 100<strong>04</strong><br />
Chd0 H. %UJa7, $.<br />
Attorney for Plaintiffs<br />
Estate of Raymond E. Wool<br />
Weitz & Luxenberg, P.C.<br />
700 Broadway<br />
New York, New York 10003<br />
(212) 509-3456 (212) 558-5500<br />
FILED<br />
LPR 2 6 20''<br />
SO ORDERED,<br />
N0038955-1<br />
y Klzn Heitler<br />
APR 15 zom<br />
1003-<strong>04</strong>2 1
~ ~~<br />
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK<br />
COUNTY OF NEW YORK<br />
IN RE: NEW YORK COUNTY j NYCAL<br />
ASBESTOS LITIGATION<br />
j I.A.S. Part 30<br />
! (Heitler, J.)<br />
THIS DOCUMENT REFERS TO:<br />
DOUGLAS J. WOOLSEY, AS PROPOSED<br />
ADMINISTRATOR FOR THE ESTATE OF<br />
RAYMOND E. WOOLSEY, AND EDNA C.<br />
WOOLSEY, INDIVIDUALLY ,,<br />
-against-<br />
A. C. & S., INC., et al.,<br />
Plaintiffs,<br />
j Index No.: 190365<strong>11</strong> 0<br />
[ NO OPPOSITION<br />
j SUMMARY JUDGMENT<br />
j MOTION AND ORDER<br />
Defendants.<br />
WHEREFORE, defendant, Courter & Company, Inc., hereby requests summary<br />
judgment in the above entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules 8 3212, dismissing<br />
plaintiffs' complaint against defendant, Courter & Company, Inc., with prejudice in this action,<br />
and there being no opposition thereto,<br />
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against<br />
defendant, Courter & Company, Inc., be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and<br />
without costs.<br />
1<br />
Dated: New xqrk, New York<br />
Attorney for Plaintiffs<br />
Estate of Raymond E. Wool<br />
MCGIVNEY & KLUGER, P.C.<br />
WeitzkLuxenberg,~.~. I L E D<br />
SO Broad Street-Suite 2300<br />
700 Broadway<br />
New York. New York 100<strong>04</strong>, New York, New York 10003<br />
(212) 509-3456<br />
APR 2 6 20<strong>11</strong><br />
SO ORDERED,<br />
NEW YORK<br />
COUNTY CLERK'S OFFIa'<br />
<strong>11</strong>22-23852<br />
N00389SS-1
SUPREME cowr OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK<br />
COUNTY OF NEW YORK<br />
IN RE: NEW YORK COUNTY<br />
NYCAL<br />
ASBESTOS LITIGATION<br />
I.A.S. Part 30<br />
(Heitler, J.)<br />
THIS DOCUMENT REFERS TO:<br />
DOUGLAS J. WOOLSEY, AS PROPOSED<br />
ADMINISTRATOR FOR THE ESTATE OF<br />
RAYMOND E. WOOLSEY, AND EDNA C.<br />
WOOLSEY, INDIVIDUALLY,<br />
-against-<br />
A. C. & S., INC., et al.,<br />
Plaintiffs,<br />
Defendants.<br />
Index No.: 190365/10<br />
NO OPPOSITION<br />
SUMMARY JUDGMENT<br />
MOTION AND ORDER<br />
WHEREFORE, defendant, Columbia Boiler, hereby requests summary judgment in the<br />
above entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules $ 3212, dismissing plaintiffs’<br />
complaint against defendant, Columbia Boiler, with prejudice in this action, and there being no<br />
opposition thereto,<br />
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against<br />
defendant, Columbia Boiler, be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and without<br />
costs.<br />
Dated: New York, New York<br />
/, 717 ,20<strong>11</strong><br />
Attorney for Defendant<br />
Columbia Boiler<br />
MCGIVNEY & KLUGER, P.C.<br />
80 Broad Street-Suite 2300<br />
New York, New York 100<strong>04</strong><br />
(212) 509-3456<br />
A<br />
c-hqcps u. PSli807, e$.<br />
Attorney for Plaintiffs<br />
Estate of Raymond E. Woolsey<br />
Weitz & Luxenberg, P.C.<br />
700 Broadway<br />
New York, New York 100<br />
(212) 558-5500<br />
I” .<br />
SO ORDERED, -<br />
v-<br />
Hon. Sherry Klei2Heitler<br />
N0038955-1
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK<br />
COUNTY OF NEW YORK<br />
IN RE: NEW YORK COUNTY j NYCAL<br />
ASBESTOS LITIGATION<br />
j I.A.S. Part 30<br />
! (Heitler, J.)<br />
THIS DOCUMENT REFERS TO:<br />
j<br />
Index No.: 190365AO<br />
DOUGLAS J. WOOLSEY, AS PROPOSED<br />
ADMINISTRATOR FOR THE ESTATE OF<br />
RAYMOND E. WOOLSEY, AND EDNA C,<br />
WOOLSEY, INDIVIDUALLY,<br />
i NO OPPOSITION<br />
j SUMMARY JUDGMENT<br />
Plaintiffs,<br />
j MOTION AND ORDER<br />
-against-<br />
A. C. & S,, INC., et al.,<br />
Defendants. /<br />
WHEREFORE, defendant, Oakfabco, Inc., hereby requests summary judgment in the<br />
above entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules $ 3212, dismissing plaintiffs’<br />
complaint against defendant, Oakfabco, Inc., with prejudice in this action, and there being no<br />
opposition thereto,<br />
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against<br />
defendant, Oakfabco, Tnc., be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and without<br />
costs.<br />
Oakfabco, Inc.<br />
Estate of Raymond E. Woolsey<br />
MCGIVNEY & KLUGEK, P.C.<br />
Weitz & Luxenberg, P.C.<br />
80 Broad Street-Suite 2300<br />
700 Broadway<br />
New York, New York 100<strong>04</strong> New York, New York 10003<br />
(212) 509-3456 (212) 558-5500<br />
SO ORDERED,<br />
2571-772<br />
N0038955-1<br />
APE I 5 70<strong>11</strong>
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK<br />
COUNTY OF NEW YORK<br />
IN RE: NEW YORK COUNTY<br />
NYCAL<br />
ASBESTOS LITIGATION<br />
I.A.S. Part 30<br />
(Heitler, J.)<br />
THIS DOCUMENT REFERS TO:<br />
DOUGLAS J. WOOLSEY, AS PROPOSED<br />
ADMINISTRATOR FOR THE ESTATE OF<br />
RAYMOND E. WOOLSEY, AND EDNA C.<br />
WOOLSEY, INDIVIDUALLY,<br />
-against-<br />
A. C. & S., INC., et al.,<br />
Plaintiffs,<br />
Defendants.<br />
Index No.: 190365/10<br />
NO OPPOSITION<br />
SUMMARY JUDGMENT<br />
MOTION AND ORDER<br />
WHEREFORE, defendant, Kentile Floors, Inc., hereby requests summary judgment in<br />
the above entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules 6 3212, dismissing plaintiffs'<br />
complaint against defendant, Kentile Floors, Inc., with prejudice in this action, and there being<br />
no opposition thereto,<br />
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against<br />
defendant, Kentile Floors, Inc., be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and without<br />
costs.<br />
Dated: New Yor , New York<br />
/3n $7 ,20<strong>11</strong><br />
Y, ,<br />
Carol M. Tempesta, Esq.<br />
Attorney for Defendant<br />
Kentile Floors, Inc.<br />
MCGIVNEY & KLUGER, P.C.<br />
80 Broad Street-Suite 2300<br />
New York, New York 100<strong>04</strong><br />
(212) 509-3456<br />
SO ORDERED,<br />
Attorney for Plaintiffs<br />
Estate of Raymond E. Woolsey<br />
Weitz & Luxenberg, P.C.<br />
700 Broadway<br />
New York, New York 10003<br />
BpR 2 6 2Q"<br />
N0038955-1
WHEREFORE, defendant Parker Hannifin Corporation hereby requests s m q<br />
judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212,<br />
dismissing plaintiffs' complaint against defendant Parker Hannifin Corporation with prejudice,<br />
and there being no opposition thereto,<br />
ORDEED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against<br />
defendant Parker Hannifin Corporation be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and<br />
without costs.<br />
Attorneys for Plaintiff<br />
800 Third Avenue<br />
New York, New York 10022<br />
21 2.605.6200<br />
SO ORDERED,<br />
Richard P. O'Leary, Esq.<br />
U<br />
McCarter & English, LLP<br />
Attorneys for Defendant<br />
Parker Hannifin Corporation<br />
245 Park Avm,I D<br />
NewYork,Ne Yo 1<br />
2 12.609.6800<br />
APR 2 6 20<strong>11</strong><br />
NEW YORK<br />
COUNTY CLERK'S OFFICE'<br />
ME1 <strong>11</strong>161989v.1
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK<br />
COUNTY OF NEW YORK<br />
JAMES GUCK and JOAN GUCK,<br />
X<br />
NYCAL<br />
Index No. 10/190368<br />
-V-<br />
Plaintiff(s),<br />
A,O. SMITH WATER PRODUCTS CO., et al.,<br />
NO OPPOSITION<br />
SUMMARY JUDGMENT<br />
MOTION AND ORDER<br />
Justice Sherry K. Heitler<br />
I<br />
I<br />
Defendants.<br />
X<br />
WHEREFORE, defendant Hopeman Brothers, Inc. hereby requests summary judgment in the<br />
above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212, dismissing plaintiff's<br />
complaint against defendant Hopeman Brothers, Inc. with prejudice, and there being no opposition<br />
thereto,<br />
Ordered, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against defendant<br />
Hopeman Brothers, Inc., be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and without costs.<br />
D a t e m r k % r York<br />
, 20<strong>11</strong><br />
LEVY, PHILLIPS & KONIGSBERG, L.L.P.<br />
DARGER & ERRANTE LLP<br />
SO ORDERED:<br />
+- (21 2) 452-5300
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK<br />
COUNTY OF NEW YORK<br />
IN RE: NEW YORK COUNTY j NYCAL<br />
ASBESTOS LITIGATION<br />
j I.A.S. Part 30<br />
j (Heitler, J,)<br />
THIS DOCUMENT REFERS TO:<br />
j Index No.: 190370/10<br />
ARUNKUMAR PATEL,<br />
-against-<br />
A. C. & S., INC., et al.,<br />
Plaintiffs,<br />
i NO OPPOSITION<br />
! SUMMARY JUDGMENT<br />
i MOTION AND ORDER<br />
Defendants. [<br />
WHEREFORE, defendant, Kentile Floors, Inc., hereby requests summary judgment in<br />
the above entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules 6 32 12, dismissing plaintiffs'<br />
complaint against defendant, Kentile Floors, Inc., with prejudice in this action, and there being<br />
no opposition thereto,<br />
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against<br />
defendant, Kentile Floors, Inc., be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and without<br />
costs.<br />
Dated: New Y rk, New York<br />
7/77 ,20<strong>11</strong><br />
Attorney Carol M. for Ternpesta, Defendant E s F<br />
Kentile Floors, Inc.<br />
Arunkurnar Patel<br />
MCGIVNEY & KLUGER, P.C.<br />
Weitz & Luxenberg, P.C.<br />
80 Broad Street-Suite 2300 700 Broadway APR 2 6 20<strong>11</strong><br />
New York, New York 100<strong>04</strong><br />
New York, New York 10003<br />
(212) 509-3456 (212) 558-5500<br />
NEW YORK<br />
COUNTY CLERK'S 6FFm<br />
7Attorney for Plaintiffs P I L E I)<br />
SO ORDERED,<br />
N0038955-1<br />
Hon. Sherry KleK Heitler<br />
2082- 10382
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK<br />
COUNTY OF NEW YORK<br />
IN RE: NEW YORK COUNTY i NYCAL<br />
ASBESTOS LITIGATION i I.A.S. Part 30<br />
(Heitler, J.)<br />
THIS DOCUMENT REFERS TO:<br />
MICHAEL C, SACCENTO AND CATHERINE<br />
SACCENTO,<br />
"against-<br />
A, C. & S., INC, et al.,<br />
Plaintiffs,<br />
Defendants.<br />
i<br />
Index No.: 190376<strong>11</strong> 0<br />
NO OPPOSITION<br />
SUMMARY JUDGMENT<br />
MOTION AND ORDER<br />
I<br />
I<br />
!<br />
WHEREFORE, defendant, Kentile Floors, Inc., hereby requests summary judgment in<br />
the above entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules<br />
3212, dismissing plaintiffs'<br />
complaint against defendant, Kentile Floors, Inc., with prejudice in this action, and there being<br />
no opposition thereto,<br />
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against<br />
defendant, Kentile Floors, Inc., be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and without<br />
costs.<br />
Dated: New Y k, New York<br />
$ ,20<strong>11</strong><br />
Carol M. Teipesta, Esq. "<br />
Attorney for Defendant<br />
Kentile Floors, Inc.<br />
MCGIVNEY & KLUGER, P.C.<br />
80 Broad Street-Suite 2300<br />
New York, New York 100<strong>04</strong><br />
(2 12) 509-3456<br />
Michael C. Saccento and Catherine Saccento<br />
Weitz & Luxenberg, P.C.<br />
700 Broadway<br />
New York, New York 10003<br />
(212) 558-5500<br />
SO ORDERED,<br />
NO038955-1<br />
Hon, Shdrry Klein Heitler<br />
2082-1 0384
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YON<br />
COUNTY OF NEW YORK<br />
IN RE: NEW YORK COUNTY<br />
! NYCAL<br />
ASBESTOS LITIGATION<br />
I.A.S. Part 30<br />
(Heitler, J.)<br />
-<br />
THIS DOCUMENT REFERS TO:<br />
MICHAEL C. SACCENTO AND CATHERINE<br />
SACCENTO,<br />
-against-<br />
Plaintiffs,<br />
Index No.: 190376<strong>11</strong> 0<br />
NO OPPOSITION<br />
SUMMARY JUDGMENT<br />
MOTION AND ORDER<br />
A, C. & S., INC., et al.,<br />
Defendants.<br />
j<br />
WHEREFORE, defendant, Treadwell Corporation, hereby requests summary judgment in<br />
the above entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules 6 3212, dismissing plaintiffs'<br />
complaint against defendant, Treadwell Corporation, with prejudice in this action, and there<br />
being no opposition thereto,<br />
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against<br />
defendant, Treadwell Corporation, be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and<br />
without costs.<br />
Dated: New York, New York<br />
417 ,20<strong>11</strong><br />
Michele J. Mittlef;;an, Esq.<br />
Attorney for Defendant<br />
Treadwell Corporation<br />
MCGIVNEY & KLUGER, P.C.<br />
80 Broad Street-Suite 2300<br />
New York, New York 100<strong>04</strong><br />
(212) 509-3456<br />
Michaei C. Saccento and Catherine Saccento<br />
Weitz & Luxenberg, P.C.<br />
700 Broadway<br />
New York, New York 10003<br />
(2 12) 558-5500<br />
__,_"...<br />
SO ORDERED,<br />
N0038955-1<br />
Hon. Sherry Klein Heitler<br />
1235-23481
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK<br />
COUNTY OF NEW YORK<br />
IN RE: NEW YORK COUNTY<br />
! NYCAL<br />
ASBESTOS LITIGATION<br />
j I.A.S. Part 30<br />
! (Heitler, J.)<br />
THIS DOCUMENT REFERS TO:<br />
MICHAEL C. SACCENTO AND CATHERINE<br />
SACCENTO,<br />
"against-<br />
A. C. & S., INC., et al.,<br />
Plaintiffs,<br />
j Index No.: 190376/10<br />
!<br />
i NO OPPOSITION<br />
! SUMMARY JUDGMENT<br />
MOTION AND ORDER<br />
i<br />
Defendants.<br />
j<br />
WHEREFORE, defendant, Courter & Company, Inc., hereby requests summary<br />
judgment in the above entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules $3212, dismissing<br />
plaintiffs' complaint against defendant, Courter & Company, Inc., with prejudice in this action,<br />
and there being no opposition thereto,<br />
ORDERED, that upon notice to all eo-defendants, all claims and cross claims against<br />
defendant, Courter & Company, Inc., be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and<br />
without costs,<br />
Dated: New Yo k, New York<br />
,20<strong>11</strong><br />
FILED<br />
APR 2 6 20<strong>11</strong><br />
NEW YORK<br />
COUNT( CLERKS OFFICE'<br />
Attorney for Plaintiffs<br />
Michael C. Saccento and Catherine Saccento<br />
McGrwY & KLUGER, P.C.<br />
Weitz & Luxenberg, P.C.<br />
80 Broad Street-Suite 2300<br />
700 Broadway<br />
New York, New York 100<strong>04</strong><br />
New York, New York 10003<br />
(212) 509-3456 (212) 558-5500<br />
SO ORDERED,<br />
NO03 8955- 1<br />
Hon. Sherry Kfein Heitler<br />
<strong>11</strong>22-23857
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK<br />
COUNTY OF NEW YORK<br />
IN RE NEW YORK CITY<br />
ASBESTOS LITIGATION<br />
GEORGIANA TANSOSCH, Individually and as Executrix of<br />
the Estate of CHRISTOPHER T. TANSOSCH, Deceased,<br />
1.<br />
NYCAL<br />
Index No. 190382/20 10<br />
-against-<br />
Plaintiffs,<br />
NO OPPOSITION<br />
SUMMARY JUDGMENT<br />
MOTION AND ORDER<br />
A.O. SMITH WATER PRODUCTS, et al.,<br />
including SEARS, ROEBUCK AND CO.,<br />
Defendants.<br />
._<br />
WHEREFORE, defendant Sears, Roebuck and Co. (incorrectly sued herein as Sears, Roebuck<br />
and Company) (hereinafter “Sears”) hereby requests summary judgment in the above-entitled case,<br />
pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212, dismissing plaintiffs’ complaint against<br />
defendant Sears with prejudice, and there being no opposition thereto,<br />
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against defendant<br />
Sears be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and without costs.<br />
Dated:<br />
New York, New York<br />
March 22,201 1<br />
BELLUCK & FOX, LLP<br />
546 Fifth Avenue, 4“ Floor 150 Broadway, Suite 600<br />
New York, New York 10036<br />
New York, New York 10038<br />
APR 2 6 2u<strong>11</strong><br />
Attorneys for Plaintiffs<br />
Attorneys for Defendant<br />
Christopher Tansosch, et al. Sears, Roebuck and Co. fwv YORK<br />
(212) 681-1575 .TO285 ‘OUNw cLERRs<br />
SO ORDERED,<br />
APR 15 20<strong>11</strong>
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK<br />
COUNTY OF NEW YORK<br />
IN RE: NEW YORK COUNTY<br />
! NYCAL<br />
ASBESTOS LITIGATION<br />
j I.A.S. Part 30<br />
j (Heitler, J.)<br />
THIS DOCUMENT REFERS TO:<br />
i Index No.: 190384/10<br />
FRANCIS P. MCPADDEN,<br />
-against-<br />
A. C. & S., INC., et al,,<br />
Plaintiffs, i NO OPPOSITION<br />
/ SUMMARY JUDGMENT<br />
i MOTION AND ORDER<br />
Defendants.<br />
WHEREFORE, defendant, Flowserve Corporation Wa The Duriron Company, Inc.,<br />
hereby requests summary judgment in the above entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law<br />
and Rules $ 3212, dismissing plaintiffs’ complaint against defendant, Flowserve Corporation<br />
fMa The Duriron Company, Inc., with prejudice in this action, and there being no opposition<br />
thereto,<br />
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against<br />
defendant, Flowserve Corporation fMa The Duriron Company, Inc., be and the same are hereby<br />
dismissed with prejudice and without costs.<br />
Dated: New York, New York<br />
L*<br />
”<br />
Matthew Attorney T. for Fakley, Defendant Esq. Attorney c for 6 Plaintiffs bf- FeQltSO,, “SS<br />
Flowserve Corporation<br />
Francis P. McPadden<br />
D !<br />
MCGIVNEY & KLUGER, P.C.<br />
Weitz&Luxenberg,P.C.F \ t E<br />
80 Broad Street-Suite 2300<br />
700 Broadway<br />
New York, New York 100<strong>04</strong><br />
(2 12) 509-3455<br />
SO ORDERED,<br />
951-894<br />
N0038955- 1
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK<br />
COUNTY OF NEW YORK<br />
IN RE: NEW YORK COUNTY j NYCAL<br />
ASBESTOS LITIGATION<br />
j I.A.S. Part 30<br />
j (Heitler, J.)<br />
THIS DOCUMENT REFERS TO:<br />
j Index No,: 190384/10<br />
FRANCIS P. MCPADDEN,<br />
magainst-<br />
A. C. & S., INC., et al.,<br />
Plaintiffs,<br />
i NO OPPOSITION<br />
! SUMMARY JUDGMENT<br />
i MOTION AND ORDER<br />
Defendants. !<br />
WHEREFORE, defendant, Kentile Floors, Inc,, hereby requests summary judgment in<br />
the above entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules 5 3212, dismissing plaintiffs’<br />
complaint against defendant, Kentile Floors, Inc., with prejudice in this action, and there being<br />
no opposition thereto,<br />
ORDEED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against<br />
defendant, Kentile Floors, Inc., be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and without<br />
costs.<br />
@k*<br />
Carol M. Tempesta, Esk. ’<br />
Gl+s cl. FegmTJ/Zs&<br />
Dated: New York, New York<br />
,20<strong>11</strong><br />
4-l ’<br />
Attorney for Defendant<br />
Kentile Floors, Inc.<br />
MCGIVNEY & KLUGER, P.C.<br />
80 Broad Street-Suite 2300<br />
New York, New York 100<strong>04</strong><br />
(212) 509-3456<br />
Attorney for Plaintiffs<br />
Francis P. McPadden<br />
Weitz & Luxenberg, P.C.<br />
700 Broadway<br />
New York, New York ]OF I L E D<br />
SO ORDERED,<br />
APR 2 6 20<strong>11</strong><br />
NEW YORK<br />
f349tJM34d CLERKS OFFj@<br />
N0038955-1
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK<br />
COUNTY OF NEW YORK<br />
IN RE: NEW YORK COUNTY<br />
j NYCAL<br />
ASBESTOS LITIGATION<br />
j I.A.S. Part 30<br />
! (Heitler, J.)<br />
THIS DOCUMENT REFERS TO:<br />
i Index No.: 190384/10<br />
FRANCIS P. MCPADDEN,<br />
Plaintiffs, i NO OPPOSITION<br />
j SUMMARY JUDGMENT<br />
-against- j MOTION AND ORDER<br />
A. C. & S., INC., et al.,<br />
Defendants. /<br />
WHEREFORE, defendant, The Fairbanks Company, hereby requests summary judgment<br />
in the above entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules 4 3212, dismissing<br />
plaintiffs’ complaint against defendant, The Fairbanks Company, with prejudice in this action,<br />
and there being no opposition thereto,<br />
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against<br />
defendant, The Fairbanks Company, be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and<br />
without costs.<br />
Okwedeo N. Okoh, Esq.<br />
Attorney for Defendant<br />
Attorney for Plaintiffs<br />
The Fairbanks Company<br />
Francis P. McPadden<br />
MCGIVNEY & KLUGER, P.C.<br />
Weitz & Luxenberg, P.C.<br />
80 Broad Street-Suite 2300<br />
700 Broadway<br />
New York, New York 100<strong>04</strong><br />
New York, New York 100<br />
(212) 509-3456 (212) 558-5500<br />
N00389SS-1<br />
AP63 15 20<strong>11</strong>
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK<br />
COUNTY OF NEW YORK<br />
In Re: NEW YORK CITYASBESTOS LITIGATION<br />
Index No.: 190384/10<br />
FRANCIS McPADDEN,<br />
- against -<br />
AC and S, Pic., (ARMSGTRONG<br />
CONTRACTING & SUPPLY) et al.,<br />
Plaintiff(s),<br />
Defendants.<br />
NO OPPOSITION<br />
SUMMARY JUDGMENT<br />
MOTION<br />
WHEREFORE, Defendant WEIL-MCLAIN COMPANY, INC,, hereinafter ("WEIL-<br />
MCLAIN") hereby requests Summary Judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil<br />
Practice Law and Rules Section 32 12, dismissing plaintiffs complaint against Defendant Weil-<br />
McLain with prejudice, and there being no opposition thereto,<br />
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against<br />
Defendant, Weil-McLain be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and without costs<br />
to either party.<br />
Dated: qhf ,20<strong>11</strong><br />
New York, New York<br />
WEITZ & LUXENBERG, P.C.<br />
Attorneys for Plaintiff<br />
SEGAL MCCAMBRIDGE<br />
SINGER & MAHONEY, LTD.<br />
700 Broadway Attorneys forDefendant I E D<br />
New York, NY 10003<br />
(212) 558-5500<br />
SO ORDERED,<br />
H<br />
Weil-McLain<br />
850 Third Avenue, Suite <strong>11</strong>00<br />
New York, NY 10022 ApR 2 6 20<strong>11</strong><br />
"W-Y<br />
IVEW YORK<br />
CLERRS OFFcE
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK<br />
COUNTY OF NEW YORK<br />
IN RE NEW YORK CITY ASBESTOS LITIGATION NYCAL<br />
Hon. Sherry Klein Heitler<br />
MARVIN EISENBERG and LORRAINE EISENBERG,<br />
X<br />
X<br />
Index No. 190397-2010<br />
-against-<br />
Plaint iff (s),<br />
NO OPPOSITION<br />
SUMMARY JUDGMENT MOTION AND<br />
ORDER<br />
CARRIER CORPORATION et al., including<br />
GENERAL ELECTRIC COMPANY,<br />
Defendants.<br />
X<br />
WHEREFORE, defendant GENERAL ELECTRIC COMPANY hereby requests summary judgment in<br />
the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212, dismissing plaintiffs’<br />
complaint against defendant GENERAL ELECTRIC COMPANY with prejudice, and there being no<br />
opposition thereto,<br />
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against defendant<br />
GENERAL ELECTRIC<br />
*<br />
COMPANY be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and without costs.<br />
Dated: NewY k, ewYork<br />
Attorneys for Plain tvfs<br />
Attorneys for General Electric Company<br />
546 Fifth Avenue, qfh Flo<br />
Three Gateway Center, 12‘h Floor<br />
New York, NY 10036 -. Newark, NJ 07102<br />
SO ORDERED,<br />
Hon. Sherry Klein Heitler, J.S.C.
COUNTY OF NEW YORK<br />
IN RE NEW YORK CITY ASBESTOS LITIGATION NYCAL<br />
Hon. Sherry Klein Heitler<br />
MARVIN EISENBERG and LORRAINE EISENBERG,<br />
-against-<br />
Plaint iff (s),<br />
CARRIER CORPORATION et al., including<br />
GENERAL ELECTRIC COMPANY,<br />
Defendants.<br />
X<br />
X<br />
Index No. 190397-2010<br />
NO OPPOSITION<br />
SUMMARY JUDGMENT MOTION AND<br />
ORDER<br />
WHEREFORE, defendant GENERAL ELECTRIC COMPANY hereby requests summary judgment in<br />
the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212, dismissing plaintiffs'<br />
complaint against defendant GENERAL ELECTRIC COMPANY with prejudice, and there being no<br />
opposition thereto,<br />
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against defendant<br />
GENERAL ELECTRIC COMPANY be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and without costs.<br />
Dated:<br />
New York, New York<br />
Attorneys for Plaint$fs<br />
546 Fifth Avenue, 4'h Floor<br />
New York, NY 10036<br />
Sedgwick, Detert, Moran 81 Arnold, LLP<br />
Attorneys for General Elec<br />
Three Gateway Center, 12<br />
Newark, NJ 07102<br />
APR 2 6 20<strong>11</strong><br />
SO ORDERED,<br />
8% . . I. -
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK<br />
COUNTY OF NEW YORK<br />
IN RE: NEW YORK CITY<br />
ASBESTOS LITIGATION<br />
THOMAS J. COYNE and SUZANNE COYNE,<br />
Plaintiffs,<br />
-against-<br />
ALUMINUM COMPANY OF AMERICA (ALCOA). et al. including,<br />
GATES CORPORATION,<br />
NYCAL<br />
I.A.S. Part 30<br />
Hon. Sherry Klein Heitler, J.S.C.<br />
Index No.: 190399-2010<br />
NO OPPOSITION SUMMARY JUDGMENT<br />
MOTION AND ORDER<br />
Defendants.<br />
WHEREFORE, defendant THE GATES CORPORATION, sued herein as GATES CORPORATION<br />
hereby request summary judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules<br />
Section 3212, dismissing plaintiffs complaint against defendant GATES with prejudice, and there being<br />
no opposition thereto,<br />
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against defendant<br />
THE GATES CORPORATION be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and without costs.<br />
Dated:<br />
New York, New York<br />
APE\\ 13, tot1<br />
."<br />
Patti Burshtyn, Esq. Dennis E. VegcEsq," - (d<br />
Weitz & Luxenberg, P.C.<br />
Attorney for Plaintiffs<br />
700 Broadway<br />
New York, New York 10003<br />
Sedgwick, Detert, Moran & Arnold, LLP<br />
Attorneys far The Gates Corporation<br />
Three Gateway Center, 12fh Floor<br />
Newark, NJ 07102<br />
(212) 558-5500 -0002 F 1 L E D<br />
SO ORDERED,<br />
Hon. Sherry Klein Heitler<br />
APR 2 6 20''<br />
NJ/4343 18v 1
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK<br />
COUNTY OF NEW YORK<br />
IN RE: NEW YORK COUNTY<br />
NYCAL<br />
ASBESTOS LITIGATION<br />
I.A.S. Part 30<br />
(Heitler, J.)<br />
THIS DOCUMENT REFERS TO:<br />
Index No.: 190399/10<br />
THOMAS J, COYNE AND SUZANNE COYNE,<br />
-against-<br />
A. C. & S., INC., et al.,<br />
Plaintiffs,<br />
Defendants.<br />
NO OPPOSITION<br />
SUMMARY JUDGMENT<br />
MOTION AND ORDER<br />
WHEREFORE, defendant, Kentile Floors, Inc., hereby requests summary judgment in<br />
the above entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules 0 3212, dismissing plaintiffs'<br />
complaint against defendant, Kentile Floors, Inc,, with prejudice in this action, and there being<br />
no opposition thereto,<br />
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against<br />
defendant, Kentile Floors, Inc., be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and without<br />
costs.<br />
Dated: New York, New York<br />
q/7 ,20<strong>11</strong><br />
Carol M. Tempesta, Esq.<br />
Attorney for Defendant<br />
Kentile Floors, Tnc.<br />
Thomas J. Coyne and Suz<br />
MCGIVNEY & KLUGER, P.C. Weitz & Luxenberg, ., P.C.<br />
80 Broad Street-Suite 2300<br />
700 Broadway<br />
New York, New York I00<strong>04</strong><br />
New York, New York 10003<br />
(2 12) 509-3456<br />
A~~ 2 6 20<strong>11</strong><br />
SO ORDERED,<br />
NEW YORK<br />
couNn CL€RKS OFFICE:<br />
2082- io534
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK<br />
COUNTY OF NEW YORK<br />
IN RE NEW YORK CITY ASBESTOS LITIGATION NYCAL<br />
Hon. Sherry Klein Heitler<br />
JULIO C. CARAY and ROX ANA GARAY, Index NO. 19<strong>04</strong><strong>04</strong>-2010<br />
X<br />
X<br />
-against-<br />
Plaintiff(s),<br />
BORG-WARNER CORPORATION et al., including<br />
GENERAL ELECTRIC COMPANY,<br />
NO OPPOSITION<br />
SUMMARY JUDGMENT MOTION AND<br />
ORDER<br />
Defendants.<br />
X<br />
WHEREFORE, defendant GENERAL ELECTRIC COMPANY hereby requests summary judgment in<br />
the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212, dismissing plaintiffs'<br />
complaint against defendant GENERAL ELECTRIC COMPANY with prejudice, and there being no<br />
opposition thereto,<br />
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against defendant<br />
GENERAL ELECTRIC COMPANY be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and without costs.<br />
Dated:<br />
New York, New York<br />
Apd 13,201 I<br />
7 -.-<br />
Patti Burshtyn, Esq.<br />
Stephen Novakidis, Esq.<br />
Weitr & Luxenberg, P.C.<br />
Sedgwick, Detert, Mora<br />
Attorneys far Plaintil'fs<br />
Attorneys for General Ele<br />
700 Broadway<br />
Three Gateway Center, 12<br />
New York, NY 10003<br />
Newark, NJ 07102<br />
(212) 558-5500 973) 242-0002 ApR 2 6 20'<br />
SO ORDERED,<br />
--- ~<br />
-II
NYCAL<br />
I.A.S. Part 30<br />
Hon. Sherry Klein Heitler, J.S.C.<br />
JULIO C. GARAY and ROX ANA CARAY,<br />
Plaintiffs,<br />
-against-<br />
BORG-WARNER CORPORATION et al. including,<br />
GATES CORPORATION,<br />
Index No.: 19<strong>04</strong><strong>04</strong>-2010<br />
NO OPPOSITION SUMMARY JUDGMENT<br />
MOTION AND ORDER<br />
Defendants.<br />
WHEREFORE, defendant THE GATES CORPORATION, sued herein as GATES CORPORATION<br />
hereby request summary judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules<br />
Section 3212, dismissing plaintiff's complaint against defendant GATES with prejudice, and there being<br />
no opposition thereto,<br />
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against defendant<br />
THE GATES CORPORATION be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and without costs.<br />
Dated:<br />
- ..<br />
' -.k>/-d2-<br />
New York, New York<br />
A+il 13, 201 I<br />
Patti Burshtyn, Esq.<br />
Weitz & Luxenberg, P.C.<br />
Attorney for Plaintvfs<br />
700 Broadway<br />
New York, New York 10003<br />
(212) 558-5500<br />
. . (973) 242-0002<br />
Dennis E. V e g a r<br />
Sedgwick, Detert, Moran & Arnold, LLP<br />
Attorneys for The Gates Corporation<br />
Three Gateway Center, 12th Floor<br />
Newark, NJ 07102<br />
SO ORDERED,<br />
LPR 2 6 ZO'
~<br />
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK<br />
COUNTY OF NEW YORK<br />
IN RE NEW YORK CITY ASBESTOS LITIGATION NYCAL<br />
Hon. Sherry Klein Heitler<br />
X<br />
JULIO C. GARAY and ROXANA GARAY,<br />
-against-<br />
Plaintiff(s),<br />
BORC-WARNER CORPORATION et al., including<br />
CATERPILLAR INC.,<br />
Index No. 19<strong>04</strong><strong>04</strong>-2010<br />
NO OPPOSITION<br />
SUMMARY JUDGMENT MOTION AND<br />
ORDER<br />
Defendants.<br />
X<br />
WHEREFORE, defendant CATERPILLAR INC. hereby requests summary judgment in the aboveentitled<br />
case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212, dismissing plaintiffs' complaint<br />
against defendant CATERPILLAR INC. with prejudice, and there being no opposition thereto,<br />
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against defendant<br />
CATERPILLAR INC. be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and without costs.<br />
Dated:<br />
New York, New York<br />
APKll l3,20\ I<br />
.<br />
Patti Burshtyn, Esq.<br />
Stephen Novakidis, Esq.<br />
Weitz & Luxenberg, P.C.<br />
Sedgwick, Detert, Moran & Arnold, LLP<br />
Attorneys for Plaintffs<br />
Attorneys for Caterpillar Inc.<br />
700 Broadway<br />
Three Gateway Center, 12fh Floor<br />
New York, NY 10003<br />
Newark, NJ 07102<br />
(212) 558-5500 (973) 242-0002<br />
SO ORDERED,<br />
4<br />
Hon. Sherry Klein Heitler, J.S.C.<br />
WRFx<br />
FtLED<br />
rr)UN<br />
LpFl 2 6 zo"<br />
F F d<br />
C@KS O
-against-<br />
Plaintiff,<br />
New York Asbestos<br />
Litigation (NYCAL)<br />
Index No.: 19<strong>04</strong><strong>04</strong>/2010<br />
NO OPPOSITION<br />
SUMMARY<br />
JUDGMENT MOTION<br />
AND ORDER<br />
NISSAN NORTH AMERICA, INC,, et al.. ,<br />
WHEREFORE, defendant, NISSAN NORTH AMERICA, NC., hereby requests<br />
summary judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to the Civil Practice Law and Rules<br />
Section 32 12, dismissing plaintiffs Complaint against defendant, NISSAN NORTH AMERICA,<br />
INC.? with prejudice, and there being no opposition thereto.<br />
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross-claims against<br />
defendant, NISSAN NORTH AMERICA, INC., be and the same are hereby dismissed with<br />
prejudice and without costs.<br />
Dated: New York, New York<br />
&+,I 13 ,20<strong>11</strong><br />
LAWN, O'NETL, FUCCI, CEDRONE<br />
& DiSIPIO n<br />
WEITZ & LUXENBERG, P.C.<br />
By:<br />
Tirnothga cHugqEsq.<br />
Attorneys for Defendant<br />
NISSAN NORTH AMERICA, INC.,<br />
420 Lexington Avenue, Suite 335<br />
Graybar Building<br />
New York, New York 10170<br />
(212) 3 19-6898<br />
Our'File No.: 6087-95<br />
Patti Burshtyn, Esq.<br />
Attorneys for Plaintiff<br />
700 Broadway<br />
New York, New York 10003<br />
SO-ORDERED:
I<br />
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK<br />
COUNTY OF NEW YORK<br />
IN RE: NEW YORK COUNTY<br />
i NYCAL<br />
ASBESTOS LITIGATION<br />
j I.A.S. Part 30<br />
i (Heitler, J.)<br />
THIS DOCUMENT REFERS TO:<br />
j Index No.: 19<strong>04</strong><strong>11</strong>/10<br />
PATRICIA A. FOLEY AND THOMAS FOLEY, j<br />
-against-<br />
A. C. & S., INC., et al.,<br />
Plaintiffs,<br />
Defendants.<br />
i NO OPPOSITION<br />
j SUMMARY JUDGMENT<br />
i MOTION AND ORDER<br />
WHEREFORE, defendant, Columbia Boiler, hereby requests summary judgment in the<br />
above entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules 6 3212, dismissing plaintiffs'<br />
complaint against defendant, Columbia Boiler, with prejudice in this action, and there being no<br />
opposition thereto,<br />
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against<br />
defendant, Columbia Boiler, be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and without<br />
costs.<br />
Dated: New York, New York<br />
,il ,20<strong>11</strong><br />
Attorney for Defendant<br />
Columbia Boiler<br />
MCGIVNEY & KLUGER, P.C.<br />
80 Broad Street-Suite 2300<br />
New York, New York 100<strong>04</strong><br />
(212) 509-3456<br />
Attorney for Plaintiffs<br />
Patricia A. Foley and Thomas Foley<br />
Weitz & Luxenberg, P.C.<br />
700 Broadway<br />
New York, New York 10003<br />
FILED I<br />
(2 12) 558-5500<br />
SO ORDERED,<br />
Hon. Sheny Klein Heitler<br />
--..<br />
APR 2 6 20<strong>11</strong><br />
N0038955-1
NYCAL<br />
I.A,S. Part 30<br />
('Heitleq I)<br />
April 201 1 In Extremis Group<br />
LUIS ODDO,<br />
-against-<br />
A.O. SMITH WATER PRODUCTS, et al.,<br />
Plaintiffs,<br />
Index No. 19<strong>04</strong>14/2010<br />
NO OPPOSITION<br />
SUMMARY JUDGMENT<br />
MOTION AND ORDER<br />
WHEREFORE, Defendant INTERNATIONAL PAPER COMPANY Wa US.<br />
PLYWOOD CORPORATION hereby requests Summary Judgment in the above-entitled case<br />
pwsuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules $3212, dismissing plaintiff's Complaint against<br />
INTERNATIONAL PAPER COMPANY s/h/a U.S. PLYWOOD CORPORATION with<br />
prejudice, and there being no opposition thereto, it is<br />
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross-claims against<br />
INTERNATIONAL PAPER COMPANY &/a U.S. PLYWOOD CORPORATION, be and the<br />
same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and without costs.<br />
Dated: White Plains, New York<br />
Attorneys for Plaintiffs<br />
SO ORDERED:
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK<br />
COUNTY OF NEW YORK<br />
IN RE: NEW YORK COUNTY<br />
NYCAL<br />
ASBESTOS LITIGATION<br />
I.A.S. Part 30<br />
(Heitler, J.)<br />
THIS DOCUMENT REFERS TO:<br />
Index No.: 19<strong>04</strong>15/10<br />
LINCOLN CATHERS AND NANCY CATHERS,<br />
-against-<br />
A. C. & S., INC., et al.,<br />
Plaintiffs,<br />
Defendants.<br />
NO OPPOSITION<br />
SUMMARY JUDGMENT<br />
MOTION AND ORDER<br />
WHEREFORE, defendant, Aurora Pump Company, hereby requests summary judgment<br />
in the above entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Q 3212, dismissing<br />
plaintiffs' complaint against defendant, Aurora Pump Company, with prejudice in this action,<br />
and there being no opposition thereto,<br />
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against<br />
defendant, Aurora Pump Company, be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and<br />
without costs,<br />
Dated: Ne York, New York<br />
J7 ,20<strong>11</strong><br />
I<br />
e,<br />
Chrk-<br />
/- ><br />
Attorney for Defendant<br />
Attorney for Plaintiffs<br />
uEj;)nl E?.<br />
Aurora Pump Company<br />
Lincoln Cathers and Nancy<br />
MCGIVNEY & KLUGER, P.C.<br />
Weitz & Luxenberg, P.C.<br />
80 Broad Street-Suite 2300<br />
700 Broadway<br />
New York, New York 100<strong>04</strong><br />
New York, New York 10003<br />
(212) 509-3456 (212) 558-5500<br />
SO ORDERED,<br />
-<br />
PPLED<br />
APR 2 6 20<strong>11</strong><br />
NEW YORK<br />
COUNT( CLERK'S OFFICE'<br />
N0038955-1 15 20<strong>11</strong><br />
1003-<strong>04</strong>30
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK<br />
COUNTY OF NEW YORK -*.<br />
IN RE: NEW YORK COUNTY j NYCAL<br />
ASBESTOS LITIGATION<br />
j I.A.S. Part 30<br />
i (Heitler, J.)<br />
THIS DOCUMENT REFERS TO:<br />
j Index No.: 19<strong>04</strong>16/10<br />
RAYMOND CARELLA AND EDNA CARELLA, /<br />
-against-<br />
Plaintiffs, i NO OPPOSITION<br />
! SUMMARY JUDGMENT<br />
[ MOTION AND ORDER<br />
A. C. & S., INC., et al.,<br />
Defendants.<br />
WHEREFORE, defendant, Kentile Floors, Inc., hereby requests summary judgment in<br />
the above entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules 8 3212, dismissing plaintiffs'<br />
complaint against defendant, Kentile Floors, Inc., with prejudice in this action, and there being<br />
I ..<br />
no opposition thereto,<br />
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against<br />
defendant, Kentile Floors, Inc., be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and without<br />
costs.<br />
Dated: New Y rk, New York<br />
497 ,20<strong>11</strong><br />
Carol M Ternpesta, Esq.<br />
Attorney for Defendant<br />
Kentile Floors, Inc<br />
MCGIVNEY & KLUGER, P.C.<br />
80 Broad Street-Suite 2300<br />
New York, New York 100<strong>04</strong><br />
(212) 509-3456<br />
Raymond Carella and Edna Carella<br />
Weitz & Luxenberg, P.C,<br />
New 700 Broadway 03<br />
(212) 558-5500<br />
/ APR 2 6 20<strong>11</strong><br />
York, New York 1 FILED<br />
+.<br />
so ORDERED,<br />
N0038955-1<br />
Hon. Sherry Klein Heitler<br />
NEW YORK<br />
~ N I - CLERKS Y OFFICE'<br />
2082-10554
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK<br />
COUNTY OF NEW YORK<br />
IN RE: NEW YORK COUNTY<br />
' NYCAL<br />
ASBESTOS LITIGATION<br />
I.A.S. Part 30<br />
(Heitler, J.)<br />
THIS DOCUMENT REFERS TO:<br />
Index No.: 19<strong>04</strong>16/10<br />
RAYMOND CARELLA AND EDNA CARELLA,<br />
-against-<br />
A. C. & S., INC., et al.,<br />
Plaintiffs,<br />
Defendants.<br />
NO OPPOSITION<br />
SUMMARY JUDGMENT<br />
MOTION AND ORDER<br />
WHEREFORE, defendant, Patterson Pump Co., hereby requests summary judgment in<br />
the above entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules 6 3212, dismissing plaintiffs'<br />
complaint against defendant, Patterson Pump Co., with prejudice in this action, and there being<br />
no opposition thereto,<br />
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against<br />
defendant, Patterson Pump Co., be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and without<br />
costs.<br />
Dated: New York, New York<br />
Lf!7 ,20<strong>11</strong><br />
Patterson Pump Co.<br />
MCGIVNEY & KLUGER, P.C.<br />
80 Broad Street-Suite 2300<br />
New York, New York 100<strong>04</strong><br />
(212) 509-3456<br />
w m WCp-dgyt)E+<br />
Attorney for Plaintiffs<br />
Raymond Carella and Edna Carella<br />
Weitz & Luxenberg, P.C.<br />
700 Broadway<br />
New York, New York 10003<br />
(212) 558-5500<br />
FILED .<br />
ApR 2 6 20"<br />
N0038955-1
~<br />
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK<br />
COUNTY OF NEW YORK<br />
IN RE: NEW YORK COUNTY<br />
NYCAL<br />
ASBESTOS LITIGATION<br />
I.A.S. Part 30<br />
(Heitler, J.)<br />
THIS DOCUMENT REFERS TO:<br />
Index No.: 19<strong>04</strong>16/10<br />
RAYMOND CARELLA AND EDNA CARELLA,<br />
-against-<br />
A. C. & S., INC., et al.,<br />
Plaintiffs,<br />
Defendants.<br />
NO OPPOSITION<br />
SUMMARY JUDGMENT<br />
MOTION AND ORDER<br />
WHEREFORE, defendant, Atwood & Morrill Co., Inc, hereby requests summary<br />
judgment in the above entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Q 3212, dismissing<br />
plaintiffs’ complaint against defendant, Atwood & Morrill Co., Inc, with prejudice in this action,<br />
and there being no opposition thereto,<br />
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against<br />
defendant, Atwood & Morrill Co., Inc, be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and<br />
without costs.<br />
Attorney for Defendant<br />
Atwood & Morrill Co., Inc<br />
MCGIVNEY & KLUGER, P.C.<br />
80 Broad Street-Suite 2300<br />
New York, New York 100<strong>04</strong><br />
(212) 509-3456<br />
SO ORDERED,<br />
Attorney for Plainti<br />
Raymond Carella and Edna Carella<br />
Weitz & Luxenberg, P.C.<br />
700 Broadway<br />
New York, New York IOOF \ le E<br />
(212) 558-5500<br />
9636PgU N n<br />
APB 2 6 ‘”’<br />
p$”\’d Y ORK<br />
CLERKS oFFd
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK<br />
COUNTY OF NEW YORK<br />
IN RE: NEW YORK COUNTY<br />
! NYCAL<br />
ASBESTOS LITIGATION<br />
j I.A.S. Part 30<br />
\ (Heitler, J.)<br />
THIS DOCUMENT REFERS TO:<br />
j Index No.: 19<strong>04</strong>16/10<br />
LOWELL COOPER AND GRACIE COOPER,<br />
j<br />
-against-<br />
A. C. & S., INC., et al.,<br />
Plaintiffs,<br />
Defendants.<br />
i NO OPPOSITION<br />
j SUMMARY JUDGMENT<br />
i MOTION AND ORDER<br />
WHEREFORE, defendant, Aurora Pump Company, hereby requests summary judgment<br />
in the above entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules 0 3212, dismissing<br />
plaintiffs’ complaint against defendant, Aurora Pump Company, with prejudice in this action,<br />
and there being no opposition thereto,<br />
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against<br />
defendant, Aurora Pump Company, be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and<br />
without costs.<br />
ql? 7<br />
Dated: New York, New York<br />
(-LQ-Qh 0.<br />
Michelle D. Grady,Esq.<br />
Attorney for Defendant<br />
Aurora Pump Company<br />
Chqrles M. evWGp<br />
Attorney for Plaintiffs<br />
Lowell Cooper and Gracie Cooper<br />
MCGIVNEY & KLUGER, P.C.<br />
Weitz & Luxenberg, P.C.<br />
80 Broad Street-Suite 2300<br />
New York, New York 100<strong>04</strong><br />
New 700 Broadway York, New York 1000 FILED<br />
(212) 509-3456<br />
(212) 558-5500<br />
24iikkL<br />
APR 2 6 20<strong>11</strong><br />
SO ORDERED,<br />
YORK<br />
Hon. Sherry Klein Heitler<br />
APR I5 20<strong>11</strong><br />
i o o W<br />
ERKS OFFICE:<br />
N0038955-1
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK<br />
COUNTY OF NEW YORK<br />
IN RE: NEW YORK COUNTY<br />
NYCAL<br />
ASBESTOS LITIGATION<br />
I.A.S. Part 30<br />
(Heitler, J.)<br />
THIS DOCUMENT REFERS TO:<br />
Index No.: 19<strong>04</strong>16/10<br />
LOWELL COOPER AND GRACIE COOPER,<br />
-against-<br />
A. C. & S., INC., et al.,<br />
Plaintiffs,<br />
Defendants.<br />
NO OPPOSITION<br />
SUMMARY JUDGMENT<br />
MOTION AND ORDER<br />
WHEREFORE7 defendant, National Boiler Works, Inc., hereby requests summary<br />
judgment in the above entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules 9 3212, dismissing<br />
plaintiffs' complaint against defendant, National Boiler Works, Inc., with prejudice in this<br />
action, and there being no opposition thereto,<br />
ORDEED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against<br />
defendant, National Boiler Works, Inc., be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and<br />
without costs,<br />
Dated: New York, New York<br />
417 ,20<strong>11</strong><br />
Matthew Attorney T. for Fairley, Defendant Esq.<br />
National Boiler Works, Inc.<br />
MCGIVNEY & KLUGER, P.C.<br />
80 Broad Street-Suite 2300<br />
New York, New York 100<strong>04</strong><br />
(212) 509-3456 (212) 558-5500<br />
j<br />
Attorney for Plaintiffs<br />
Lowell Cooper and Gracie Cooper<br />
Weitz & Luxenberg, P.C.<br />
700 Broadway<br />
New York, New York IO0<br />
NO03895 5- I
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK<br />
COUNTY OF NEW YORK<br />
IN RE: NEW YORK COUNTY<br />
NYCAL<br />
ASBESTOS LITIGATION<br />
I.A.S. Part 30<br />
(Heitler, J.)<br />
THIS DOCUMENT REFERS TO:<br />
Index No.: 19<strong>04</strong>16/10<br />
LOWELL COOPER AND GRACIE COOPER,<br />
-against-<br />
A. C. & S., INC., et al.,<br />
Plaintiffs,<br />
Defendants.<br />
NO OPPOSITION<br />
SUMMARY JUDGMENT<br />
MOTION AND ORDER<br />
WHEREFORE, defendant, Columbia Boiler, hereby requests summary judgment in the<br />
above entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules 0 3212, dismissing plaintiffs’<br />
complaint against defendant, Columbia Boiler, with prejudice in this action, and there being no<br />
opposition thereto,<br />
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against<br />
defendant, Columbia Boiler, be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and without<br />
costs.<br />
Dated: New York, New York<br />
Lp ,20<strong>11</strong><br />
Attorney for Defendant<br />
Attorney for Plaintiffs<br />
Columbia Boiler<br />
Lowell Cooper and Gracie Cooper<br />
MCGIVNEY & KLUGER, P.C.<br />
Weitz & Luxenberg, P.C.<br />
80 Broad Street-Suite 2300<br />
700 Broadway<br />
New York, New York 100<strong>04</strong><br />
New York, New York I0003<br />
(212) 509-3456 (212) 558-5500<br />
N0038955-1<br />
2572-18<br />
APR 1520<strong>11</strong>1
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK<br />
COUNTY OF NEW YORK<br />
IN RE: NEW YORK COUNTY<br />
ASBESTOS LITIGATION<br />
THIS DOCUMENT REFERS TO:<br />
LOWELL COOPER AND GRACIE COOPER,<br />
! NYCAL<br />
j I.A.S. Part 30<br />
! (Heitler, J.)<br />
j Index No.: 19<strong>04</strong>16/10<br />
!<br />
Plaintiffs, i NO OPPOSITION<br />
! SUMMARY JUDGMENT<br />
-against- j MOTION AND ORDER<br />
A. C. & S., INC., et al.,<br />
Defendants. !<br />
WHEREFORE, defendant, Oakfabco, Inc., hereby requests summary judgment in the<br />
above entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules 6 3212, dismissing plaintiffs'<br />
i<br />
I<br />
i<br />
complaint against defendant, Oakfabco, Inc., with prejudice in this action, and there being no<br />
opposition thereto,<br />
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against<br />
defendant, Oakfabco, Inc., be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and without<br />
Dated: New York New York<br />
417 ' ,20<strong>11</strong><br />
Robert Darish, Esq.<br />
Attorney for Defendant<br />
Oakfabco, Inc.<br />
MCGIVNEY & KLUGER, P.C.<br />
80 Broad Street-Suite 2300<br />
New York, New York 100<strong>04</strong><br />
(212) 509-3456<br />
chla h- k-5<br />
Attorney for Plaintiffs<br />
Lowell Cooper and Gracie Cooper<br />
Weitz & Luxenberg, P.C.<br />
700 Broadway<br />
New York, New York 10003<br />
(212) 558-5500<br />
2571-35<br />
N0038955-1
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK<br />
COUNTY OF NEW YORK<br />
IN RE: NEW YORK COUNTY<br />
! NYCAL<br />
ASBESTOS LITIGATION<br />
j I.A.S. Part 30<br />
! (Heitler, J.)<br />
THIS DOCUMENT REFERS TO:<br />
j Index No.: 19<strong>04</strong>17/10<br />
DANIEL ZNK AND DOROTHY ZINK,<br />
A. C. & S., INC., et al.,<br />
Plaintiffs, i NO OPPOSITION<br />
i SUMMARY JUDGMENT<br />
-against- j MOTION AND ORDER<br />
Defendants.<br />
i<br />
WHEREFORE, defendant, Aurora Pump Company, hereby requests summary judgment<br />
in the above entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules 0 3212, dismissing<br />
plaintiffs' complaint against defendant, Aurora Pump Company, with prejudice in this action,<br />
and there being no opposition thereto,<br />
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against<br />
defendant, Aurora Pump Company, be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and<br />
without costs.<br />
Dated: New Y<br />
'<strong>11</strong>;<br />
k, New York<br />
,20<strong>11</strong><br />
Michelle D. Grady, Esq.<br />
Attorney for Defendant<br />
Aurora Pump Company<br />
MCGIVNEY & KLUGER, P.C.<br />
80 Broad Street-Suite 2300<br />
Attorney for Plaintiffs<br />
Daniel Zink and Dorothy Zink<br />
Weitz & Luxenberg, P.C.<br />
700 Broadway<br />
Q<br />
New York, New York I00<strong>04</strong> New York, New York 10003 \ E<br />
(212) 509-3456 (212) 558-5500<br />
1003-<strong>04</strong>33<br />
N0038955-1<br />
APR 15 20<strong>11</strong>
~ MD*"<br />
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK<br />
COUNTY OF NEW YORK<br />
IN RE: NEW YORK COUNTY<br />
NYCAL<br />
ASBESTOS LITIGATION<br />
I.A.S. Part 30<br />
(Heitler, J.)<br />
THIS DOCUMENT REFERS TO:<br />
Index No.: 19<strong>04</strong>17/10<br />
DANIEL ZINK AND DOROTHY ZINK,<br />
-against-<br />
A. C. & S., NC., et al.,<br />
Plaintiffs,<br />
Defendants.<br />
NO OPPOSITION<br />
SUMMARY JUDGMENT<br />
MOTION AND ORDER<br />
WHEREFORE, defendant, The Fairbanks Company, hereby requests summary judgment<br />
in the above entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules 6 3212, dismissing<br />
plaintiffs' complaint against defendant, The Fairbanks Company, with prejudice in this action,<br />
and there being no opposition thereto,<br />
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against<br />
defendant, The Fairbanks Company, be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and<br />
without costs.<br />
FILED<br />
APR 2 6 20<strong>11</strong><br />
Okwedeo N. Okoh, Esq.<br />
Attorney for Defendant<br />
The Fairbanks Company<br />
MCG~VNEY & KLUGER, P.C.<br />
80 Broad Street-Suite 2300<br />
New York, New York 100<strong>04</strong><br />
(212) 509-3456<br />
Attorney for<br />
Daniel Zink and Dorothy Zink<br />
Weitz & Luxenberg, P.C.<br />
700 Broadway<br />
New York, New York 10003<br />
(212) 558-5500<br />
- NEwYORK<br />
COUNTY CLERK'S OFFICE:<br />
LhM Plaintiffs h. hw7, q,<br />
SO ORDERED,<br />
5<strong>04</strong>-0679<br />
N0038955-1 . d
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK<br />
COUNTY OF NEW YORK<br />
IN RE: NEW YORK COUNTY j NYCAL<br />
ASBESTOS LITIGATION<br />
j I.A.S. Part 30<br />
[ (Heitler, J*)<br />
THIS DOCUMENT REFERS TO:<br />
j Index No.: 19<strong>04</strong>23/10<br />
VOLKERT J. PETERS,<br />
-against-<br />
A, C. & S., INC., et al.,<br />
Plaintiffs,<br />
Defendants.<br />
i NO OPPOSITION<br />
j SUMMARY JUDGMENT<br />
i MOTION AND ORDER<br />
WHEREFORE, defendant, Columbia Boiler, hereby requests summary judgment in the<br />
above entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules $ 3212, dismissing plaintiffs’<br />
complaint against defendant, Columbia Boiler, with prejudice in this action, and there being no<br />
opposition thereto,<br />
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against<br />
defendant, Columbia Boiler, be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and without<br />
costs.<br />
Dated: New Yo k, New York<br />
q,’7 ,20<strong>11</strong><br />
I<br />
Carol M. Tempesta, Esq. ’<br />
Attorney for Defendant<br />
Columbia Boiler<br />
MCGIVNEY & KLUGER, P.C.<br />
80 Broad Street-Suite 2300<br />
New York, New York 100<strong>04</strong> New York, New York 10003<br />
(212) 509-3456<br />
SO ORDERED,<br />
Attorney for Plaintiffs<br />
Volkert J. Peters<br />
Weitz & Luxenberg, P.C.<br />
><br />
700 Broadway<br />
(212) 558-5500<br />
Hon. Sherry Klein Heitler<br />
2972-0028<br />
c,Qu@<br />
y\Ed YO@$ @O FF,G@<br />
CLE<br />
N0038955-1
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK<br />
COUNTY OF NEW YORK<br />
IN RE: NEW YORK COUNTY<br />
! NYCAL<br />
ASBESTOS LITIGATION<br />
j I.A.S. Part 30<br />
! (Heitler, J.)<br />
THIS DOCUMENT REFERS TO:<br />
j Index No.: 19<strong>04</strong>23/10<br />
VOLKERT J, PETERS,<br />
A. C. & S., INC., et al.,<br />
Plaintiffs, i NO OPPOSITION<br />
j SUMMARY JUDGMENT<br />
-against- j MOTION AND ORDER<br />
Defendants.<br />
j<br />
WHEREFORE, defendant, Courter & Company, Inc., hereby requests summary<br />
judgment in the above entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules 6 3212, dismissing<br />
plaintiffs' complaint against defendant, Courter & Company, Inc., with prejudice in this action,<br />
and there being no opposition thereto,<br />
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against<br />
defendant, Courter & Company, Inc., be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and<br />
without costs.<br />
Dated: New Y rk, New York<br />
i,p1 ,20<strong>11</strong><br />
Attorney for Plaintiffs<br />
Volkert J. Peters<br />
MCGIVNEY & KLUGER, P.C.<br />
Weitz & Luxenberg, P.C.<br />
80 Broad Street-Suite 2300<br />
700 Broadway<br />
New York, New York 100<strong>04</strong><br />
New York, New York 10003<br />
(2 12) 509-3456 (212) 558-5500<br />
FILED<br />
APR 2 6 20<strong>11</strong><br />
SO ORDERED,<br />
Hon. Sherry Klein Heitler<br />
1 122-23870<br />
NEW 'I'ORK<br />
c~~~~ CLERKS OFFICE'<br />
N0038955-1
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK<br />
COUNTY OF NEW YORK<br />
IN RE: NEW YORK COUNTY i NYCAL<br />
ASBESTOS LITIGATION<br />
j I.A.S. Part 30<br />
i (Heitler, J,)<br />
THIS DOCUMENT REFERS TO:<br />
j Index No.: 19<strong>04</strong>23/10<br />
VOLKERT J. PETERS,<br />
-against-<br />
A. C. & S., INC., et al.,<br />
Plaintiffs,<br />
Defendants.<br />
i NO OPPOSITION<br />
j SUMMARY JUDGMENT<br />
i MOTION AND ORDER<br />
WHEREFORE, defendant, Aurora Pump Company, hereby requests summary judgment<br />
in the above entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules 5 3212, dismissing<br />
plaintiffs' complaint against defendant, Aurora Pump Company, with prejudice in this action,<br />
and there being no opposition thereto,<br />
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against<br />
defendant, Aurora Pump Company, be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and<br />
without costs.<br />
Dated: New ork, New York<br />
42; ,20<strong>11</strong><br />
& !Kdb&Q-<br />
Attorney Michelle D. for Grady, Defendant Esq.<br />
3 8<br />
Attorney for Plaintiffs<br />
Aurora Pump Company<br />
Volkert J. Peters<br />
MCGIVNEY & KLUGER, P.C.<br />
Weitz & Luxenberg, P.C.<br />
80 Broad Street-Suite 2300<br />
700 Broadway<br />
New York, New York 100<strong>04</strong><br />
(212) 509-3456 (212) 558-5500<br />
1 L E D<br />
New York, New York IOOOF<br />
APR 2 6 20<strong>11</strong><br />
SO ORDERED,<br />
N0038955-1<br />
Hon. Sherry Klein Heitler<br />
NEW YQRK<br />
COUNT( CLERK'S OFFICE'<br />
1003-<strong>04</strong>34
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK<br />
COUNTY OF NEW YORK<br />
IN RE: NEW YORK COUNTY<br />
! NYCAL<br />
ASBESTOS LITIGATION<br />
i I.A.S. Part 30<br />
i (Heitler, J.)<br />
THIS DOCUMENT REFERS TO:<br />
i Index No.: 19<strong>04</strong>23/10<br />
VOLKERT J. PETERS,<br />
A, C. & S., INC., et al.,<br />
Plaintiffs, i NO OPPOSITION<br />
j SUMMARY JUDGMENT<br />
-against- j MOTION AND ORDER<br />
Defendants.<br />
WHEREFORE, defendant, The Fairbanks Company, hereby requests summary judgment<br />
in the above entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules § 3212, dismissing<br />
plaintiffs' complaint against defendant, The Fairbanks Company, with prejudice in this action,<br />
and there being no opposition thereto,<br />
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against<br />
defendant, The Fairbanks Company, be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and<br />
without costs.<br />
Dated: New Y rk, New York<br />
lj97 ,20<strong>11</strong><br />
6kwedeo N. Okoh, Esq.<br />
Attorney for Defendant<br />
The Fairbanks Company<br />
MCGIVNEY & KLUGER, P.C.<br />
80 Broad Street-Suite 2300<br />
New York, New York 100<strong>04</strong><br />
(212) 509-3456<br />
SO ORDERED, 2<br />
N0038955-1<br />
kg~s, Es<br />
'%A6<br />
Attorney for Plaintiffs 9.<br />
Volkert J. Peters<br />
Weitz & Luxenberg, P.C.<br />
700 Broadway<br />
New York, New York 10003<br />
(212) 558-5500<br />
Hon. Sherry Kl& Heitler<br />
ILED<br />
APR 2 6 20<strong>11</strong><br />
5<strong>04</strong>-0678<br />
NEW YORK<br />
~ N T CLERK'S Y OFFICE]
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK<br />
COUNTY OF NEW YORK<br />
IN RE: NEW YORK COUNTY<br />
NYCAL<br />
ASBESTOS LITIGATION<br />
I.A.S. Part 30<br />
(Heitler, J.)<br />
THIS DOCUMENT REFERS TO:<br />
Index No.: 19<strong>04</strong>23/10<br />
VOLKERT J. PETERS,<br />
-against-<br />
A. C. & S., INC., et al.,<br />
Plaintiffs,<br />
Defendants.<br />
NO OPPOSITION<br />
SUMMARY JUDGMENT<br />
MOTION AND ORDER<br />
WHEREFORE, defendant, Treadwell Corporation, hereby requests summary judgment in<br />
the above entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules 8 3212, dismissing plaintiffs'<br />
complaint against defendant, Treadwell Corporation, with prejudice in this action, and there<br />
being no opposition thereto,<br />
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against<br />
defendant, Treadwell Corporation, be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and<br />
without costs.<br />
Dated: New York, New York<br />
ql7 ,20<strong>11</strong><br />
Michele 1. Mittlekan, Esq.<br />
Attorney for Defendant<br />
Treadwell Corporation<br />
MCGIVNEY & KLUGER, P.C.<br />
80 Broad Street-Suite 2300<br />
New York, New York 100<strong>04</strong><br />
Attorney for Plaintiffs<br />
Volkert J. Peters<br />
700 Broadway<br />
New York, New York I0003<br />
(212) 509-3456 (212) 558-5500<br />
LpR 2 6 lo"<br />
SO ORDERED,<br />
1235-23500<br />
N0038955-1
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK<br />
COUNTY OF NEW YORK<br />
IN RE: NEW YORK COUNTY<br />
NYCAL<br />
ASBESTOS LITIGATION<br />
I.A.S. Part 30<br />
(Heitler, J.)<br />
THIS DOCUMENT REFERS TO:<br />
Index No.: 19<strong>04</strong>23/10<br />
VOLKERT J. PETERS,<br />
-against-<br />
A. C. & S., INC., et al.,<br />
Plaintiffs,<br />
Defendants,<br />
NO OPPOSITION<br />
SUMMARY JUDGMENT<br />
MOTION AND ORDER<br />
WHEREFORE, defendant, George A. Fuller Company, hereby requests summary<br />
judgment in the above entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules 6 3212, dismissing<br />
plaintiffs’ complaint against defendant, George A. Fuller Company, with prejudice in this action,<br />
and there being no opposition thereto,<br />
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against<br />
defendant, George A. Fuller Company, be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and<br />
without costs.<br />
Dated: New Y rk, New York<br />
$7 ,20<strong>11</strong><br />
kdJ4 ludkh,, -<br />
Michele J. Mittledh, Esq.<br />
Attorney for Defendant<br />
George A. Fuller Company<br />
MCGIVNEY & KLUGER, P.C.<br />
80 Broad Street-Suite 2300<br />
New York, New York 100<strong>04</strong><br />
Volkert J. Peters<br />
Weitz & Luxenberg, P.C.<br />
700 Broadway<br />
New York, New York 10003<br />
FILED<br />
(212) 509-3456 (212) 558-5500 jpR 2 6 ZO’’<br />
SO ORDERED,<br />
Hon. Sherry Klein\ Heitler<br />
1224-0360<br />
Nf3iv WRK<br />
~ L E R<br />
couNn<br />
N0038955-1
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK<br />
COUNTY OF NEW YORK<br />
IN RE: NEW YORK COUNTY<br />
NYCAL<br />
ASBESTOS LITIGATION<br />
I.A.S. Part 30<br />
(Heitler, J.)<br />
THIS DOCUMENT REFERS TO:<br />
Index No.: 19<strong>04</strong>23/10<br />
VOLKERT J. PETERS,<br />
-against-<br />
A. C. & S., INC., et al.,<br />
Plaintiffs,<br />
Defendants.<br />
NO OPPOSITION<br />
SUMMARY JUDGMENT<br />
MOTION AND ORDER<br />
WHEREFORE, defendant, Atwood & Morrill Co., Inc, hereby requests summary<br />
judgment in the above entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules 6 3212, dismissing<br />
plaintiffs' complaint against defendant, Atwood & Morrill Co., Inc, with prejudice in this action,<br />
and there being no opposition thereto,<br />
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against<br />
defendant, Atwood & Morrill Co., Inc, be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and<br />
without costs.<br />
Dated: New York New York<br />
q?' ,20<strong>11</strong><br />
Laura B. Hollman, Esf<br />
Attorney for Defendant<br />
Atwood & Morrill Co., Inc<br />
MCGIVNEY & KLUGER, P.C.<br />
80 Broad Street-Suite 2300<br />
New York, New York 100<strong>04</strong><br />
(212) 509-3456<br />
a<br />
\ -. #<br />
CMes N - teesoq ,&.<br />
Attorney for Plaintiffs<br />
Volkert J. Peters<br />
Weitz & Luxenberg, P.C.<br />
700 Broadway<br />
New York, New York 10003<br />
(212) 558-5500<br />
-<br />
SO ORDERED,<br />
N0038955-1<br />
963-237
I<br />
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK<br />
COUNTY OF NEW YORK<br />
IN RE: NEW YORK COUNTY<br />
ASBESTOS LITIGATION<br />
THIS DOCUMENT REFERS TO:<br />
VOLKERT J. PETERS,<br />
NYCAL<br />
I.A.S. Part 30<br />
(Hei tler, J .)<br />
Index No.: 19<strong>04</strong>23/10<br />
-against -<br />
A. C. & S., INC, et al.,<br />
Plaintiffs,<br />
Defendants.<br />
NO OPPOSITION<br />
SUMMARY JlJDGMENT<br />
MOTION AND ORDER<br />
WHEREFORE, defendant, Oakfabco, Inc., hereby requests summary judgment in the<br />
above entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules 6 3212, dismissing plaintiffs’<br />
complaint against defendant, Oakfabco, Inc., with prejudice in this action, and there being no<br />
opposition thereto,<br />
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against<br />
defendant, Oakfabco, Inc., be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and without<br />
costs.<br />
Dated: New Y rk, New York<br />
Y f7 ,20<strong>11</strong><br />
Attorney for Defendant<br />
Attorney for Plaintiffs<br />
Oakfabco, Inc.<br />
VolkeiJ. Peters<br />
MCGIVNEY & KLUGER, P.C.<br />
80 Broad Street-Suite 2300<br />
New York, New York 100<strong>04</strong><br />
Weitz & Luxenberg, P.C.<br />
700 Broadway<br />
New York, New York 1000<br />
(212) 509-3456 (212) 558-5500<br />
SO ORDERED,<br />
Hon. Sherry Klein keitler<br />
N00389SS-1
(fAv(i<br />
zp’<br />
,qPm<br />
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK<br />
COUNTY OF NEW YORK<br />
IN RE: NEW YORK CITY<br />
ASBESTOS LITIGATION<br />
STAN LEY KRAMEISEN,<br />
-against-<br />
ADIENCE INC. et al. including,<br />
FOSTER WHEELER CORPORATION,<br />
Plaintiffs,<br />
NYCAL<br />
I.A.S. Part 30<br />
Hon. Sherry Klein Heitler, J.S.C.<br />
Index No.: 19<strong>04</strong>29-2010<br />
NO OPPOSITION SUMMARY JUDGMENT<br />
MOTION AND ORDER<br />
Defendants.<br />
WHEREFORE, defendant FOSTER WHEELER, L.L.C. hereby request summary judgment in the<br />
above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212, dismissing plaintiffs’<br />
complaint against defendant FOSTER WHEELER, L.L.C. with prejudice, and there being no opposition<br />
thereto,<br />
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against defendant<br />
FOSTER WHEELER, L.L.C. be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and without costs.<br />
// jfi[7?tv/-+<br />
Dated/) New York, New York<br />
Ch istoph manelii, Esq.<br />
Wwxenberg, P.C.<br />
Att ey for Plaintffs<br />
700 Broadway<br />
New York, New York 10003 ,-.,<br />
n<br />
Sedgwick, Detert, Moran &Arn Id,<br />
Attorneys for foster Whedp.&<br />
Three Gateway Center, 12th Floor<br />
Newark, NJ 07102<br />
SO ORDERED,<br />
NEW YORK<br />
COUNTY CLERK‘S OFFICE
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK<br />
COUNTY OF NEW YORK<br />
IN RE NEW YORK COUNTY ASBESTOS<br />
LITIGATION<br />
This Document Relates To:<br />
ISAAC RUBIN and SHEI[LA RUBIN,<br />
Index No.: 190008/<strong>11</strong><br />
NO OPPOSITION SUMMARY<br />
JUDGMENT MOTION AND<br />
ORDER<br />
Plaintiff,<br />
-against-<br />
AIR & LIQUID SYSTEMS CORPORATION, as<br />
successor by Merger to Buffalo PUMPS, Inc., et al,<br />
Defendants.<br />
WHEREFORE, Defendant, TUTHILL COWORATION, solely for<br />
Murray Turbine (“Defendant”), hereby request Summary Judgment in the above-entitled case,<br />
pursuant to Civil Practice’Law and Rules Section 32 12, dismissing Plaintiffs’ complaint against<br />
Defendant TUTHILL CORPORATION solely for Murray Turbine with prejudice, and there<br />
being no opposition thereto,<br />
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims<br />
against Defendant, be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and withqut<br />
ci<br />
** !eL.<br />
Belluck & Fox, LLP c/ Braaten & Pascarella, LLC<br />
Attorneys for Plaintiff(s)<br />
546 Fifth Avenue, qth Floor<br />
New York, New York 1003<br />
Attorneys for Defendant<br />
Tuthill Corporation solely for<br />
Murray Turbine<br />
(212) 681-1575 2430 Route 34<br />
Manasquan, New Jersey 08736<br />
(732) 528-8888<br />
SO ORDERED,<br />
Hon. Sherry K. Heitler<br />
APR 1520<strong>11</strong>
Hon. Sherry Klein Heitler<br />
JOSEPH MARTIN and DORIS MARTIN,<br />
- against -<br />
Plaintiffs,<br />
A.O. SMITH WATER PRODUCTS and<br />
PIRELLI CABLE CORPORATION, et al.<br />
Index No.: 190<strong>04</strong>3/<strong>11</strong><br />
NO OPPOSITION<br />
SUMMARY<br />
JUDGMENT MOTION<br />
& ORDER<br />
Defendants.<br />
WHEREFORE, defendant PRYSMIAN COMMUNICATIONS CABLES AND<br />
SYSTEMS USA, LLC, incorrectly sued herein as "PIRELLI CABLE CORPORATION"<br />
(hereinafter "PRY SMIAN"), hereby requests summary judgment in the above-entitled<br />
case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212, dismissing plaintiffs'<br />
complaint against defendant PRY SMIAN with prejudice, and there being no opposition<br />
thereto,<br />
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims<br />
against defendant PRYSMIAN be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and<br />
v&mL<br />
William T. Miedel, Esq.<br />
HARRIS BEACH PLLC<br />
Attorneys for Defendant<br />
PRYSMIAN COMMUNICATIONS<br />
CABLES AND SYSTEMS U<br />
(212) 681-1575 100 Wall Street<br />
New York, NY 1 P\<br />
SO ORDERED,<br />
RpR 2 6 20''<br />
p\,Evi YOPLK OFF \GE<br />
G@KS<br />
APR 1mfl
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK<br />
COUNTY OF NEW YORK<br />
Joseph Martin and Doris Martin,<br />
Plaintiffs,<br />
-against-<br />
INDEX NO. 190<strong>04</strong>3/20<strong>11</strong><br />
NO OPPOSITION SUMMARY JUDGMENT<br />
MOTION AND ORDER<br />
A.O. Smith Water Products , et al.,<br />
Defendants.<br />
!<br />
. ,<br />
WHEREFORE, defendant Hawker Beechcraft Corporation, incorrectly sued herein as<br />
Raytheon Aircraft Company fMa Beech Aircraft Corporation, Inc., hereby requests summary<br />
judgment in the above entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules (i 3212, dismissing<br />
plaintiffs’ complaint against defendant Hawker Beechcraft Corporation with prejudice in this<br />
action, and there being no opposition thereto,<br />
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against<br />
defendant Hawker Beechcraft Corporation be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice<br />
and without costs.<br />
Dated:<br />
SO ORDERED:<br />
NN50957380. I<br />
Attorneys for Defendant Hawker Beechcraft<br />
Corporation<br />
Thomas M. Crispi<br />
Schiff Hardin LLP<br />
wb<br />
900 Third Avenue<br />
10022<br />
FlL - -<br />
APR 2 6 20<strong>11</strong>
So Ordered:<br />
--.
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK<br />
COUNTY OF NEW YORK<br />
X<br />
ROGER H. CRIEGO,<br />
Plaintiffs( s)<br />
-V-<br />
Index No. 1 9006 1 - 1 1<br />
NO OPPOSITION<br />
SUMMARY JUDGMENT<br />
MOTION AND ORDER<br />
AERCO INTERNATIONAL, INC,, et al.<br />
Defendants.<br />
X<br />
Justice Sherry K. Heitler<br />
WHEREFORE, defendant Linde LLC, a Delaware limited liability company, formerly<br />
known as The BOC Group, Inc. and/or Airco, Inc. (collectively, "BOC") hereby requests<br />
summary judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section<br />
32 12, dismissing Plaintiff's complaint against defendant BOC with prejudice, and there being no<br />
opposition thereto,<br />
Ordered, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against<br />
defendant BOC be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and wFu\cd&,. E D<br />
Dated: New Yo& New York<br />
4#// ,20<strong>11</strong><br />
APR 2 6 20<strong>11</strong><br />
David Chandler, Ew.<br />
Attorneys for Plaintiffs<br />
700 Broadway<br />
New York, NY 10003<br />
(212) 558-5500<br />
ENTER: ,20<strong>11</strong><br />
u i n d e CLC<br />
soom<br />
New York, NY 10016<br />
(212) 452-5300<br />
Hon. Sherry KleidWeitler, J.S.C.<br />
APR 15 20<strong>11</strong>