30.04.2014 Views

04-26-11

04-26-11

04-26-11

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

DON516120<strong>11</strong><br />

NYCAL<br />

I.A.S. Part 30<br />

Hon. Sherry Klein Heitler, J.S.C.<br />

ERNEST J. HORNEY, JR, and ROSEMARY HORNEY,<br />

Index No.:<br />

-against-<br />

Plaintiffs,<br />

NO OPPOSITION SUMMARY JUDGMENT<br />

MOTION AND ORDER<br />

A.O. SMITH WATER PRODUCTS, et al. including,<br />

FOSTER WHEELER CORPORATION,<br />

Defendants.<br />

WHEREFORE, defendant FOSTER WHEELER, L.L.C. (sued herein as “FOSTER WHEELER<br />

CORPORATION”) hereby request summary judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil<br />

Practice Law and Rules Section 3212, dismissing plaintiffs’ complaint against defendant FOSTER<br />

WHEELER, L.L.C. with prejudice, and there being no opposition thereto,<br />

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against defendant<br />

FOSTER WHEELER, L.L.C. be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and without costs.<br />

%<br />

Sedgwick, Dennis E. Vega, Detert, Moran & Arnold, LLP<br />

Weitx & Luxenberg, P.C.<br />

Attorney f or Plaintiffs<br />

Attorneys for Foster Wheeler, L. L.C.<br />

700 Broadway<br />

Three Gateway Center, 12‘h Floor<br />

New York, New York 1000 Newark, NJ 07102<br />

SO ORDERED,<br />

APR 2 6 20<strong>11</strong>


NYCAL<br />

I.A.S. Part 30<br />

Hon. Sherry Klein Heitler, J.S.C.<br />

THOMAS CARROLL et al.,<br />

-against-<br />

Plaintiff,<br />

Index No.:<br />

<strong>11</strong>9491<br />

NO OPPOSITION SUMMARY JUDGMENT<br />

MOTION AND ORDER<br />

A.C. &S. INC., et at. including,<br />

FOSTER WHEELER CORPORATION,<br />

Defendants.<br />

WHEREFORE, defendant FOSTER WHEELER, L.L.C. (sued herein as “FOSTER WHEELER<br />

.<br />

CORPORATION”) hereby request summary judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil<br />

Practice Law and Rules Section 3212, dismissing plaintiffs‘ complaint against defendant FOSTER<br />

WHEELER, L.L.C. with prejudice, and there being no opposition thereto,<br />

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against defendant<br />

FOSTER WHEELER, L.L.C. be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and without costs.<br />

Weitz & Luxenberg, P.C.<br />

Attorney for Plaintffs<br />

700 Broadway<br />

New York, New York 10003<br />

Sedgwick, Detert, Maran & Arnold, LLP<br />

Attorneys for Foster Wheeler, L. L.C.<br />

Three Gateway Center, 1Zfh Floor<br />

Newark, NJ 07102<br />

F\LED<br />

SO ORDERED,<br />

NJb41735vl


SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK<br />

COUNTY OF NEW YORK<br />

WHEREFORE, defendant Patterson-Kelley Company, sued herein as Patterson-Kelley<br />

Division, hereby requests summary judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil<br />

Practice Law and Rules Section 3212, dismissing plaintiffs complaint against defendant<br />

Patterson-Kelley Division with prejudice, and there being no opposition thereto,<br />

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against<br />

defendant Patterson-Kelley Division, be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and<br />

without costs.<br />

By:<br />

Samuel Goldblatt, Es<br />

Benjamin R. Dwyer Esq.<br />

NIXON PEABODY LLP<br />

Attorneys for Plaintiff<br />

Attorneys for Defendant,<br />

180 Maiden Lane Patterson-Kelley Comp<br />

New York, NY 10038 Key Towers at Fop *<br />

(212) 558-5500 40 Fountain Plazais<br />

Buffalo, NY 14202<br />

(716) 853-8100<br />

APT? 2 6 20<strong>11</strong><br />

SO ORDERED,<br />

APRCf! ?O <strong>11</strong><br />

NEW/ YQRK<br />

NT~ CLERK'S OFFICE'<br />

13381246. I


SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK<br />

ALL COUNTIES WITHIN NEW YORK CITY<br />

..................................... -X NY CAL<br />

IN RE: NEW YORK COUNTY I.A.S. Part 30<br />

ASBESTOS LITIGATION<br />

(Judge Heitler)<br />

____________________------------------<br />

X<br />

This Document Relates to: Index No.: 1<strong>04</strong>095/98<br />

Giovanni Petrone and Mary Petrone,<br />

- against -<br />

Plaintiffs,<br />

NO OPPOSITION<br />

SUMMARY JUDGMENT<br />

A.C. & S., Inc., et al.,<br />

MOTION AND ORDER<br />

Defendants.<br />

....................................... -X<br />

WHEREFORE, defendant Mario & DiBono Plastering Co. Inc.,<br />

hereby requests summary judgment in the above-entitled case,<br />

pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section §3212,<br />

dismissing plaintiffs' Complaint against defendant Mario E<br />

DiBono Plastering Co. Inc., with prejudice, and there being nc<br />

opposition thereto,<br />

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims<br />

and cross claims against defendant Mario & DiBono Plastering Cod<br />

Inc., be dismissed with prejudice and without costs<br />

Attorneys for Plaintiffs<br />

Attorneys for Defendant<br />

Giovanni Petrone and Mary<br />

Mario & DiBono Plastering Co.<br />

Petrone<br />

Inc.<br />

700 Broadway, 6th Floor 177 Montague Street<br />

New York, New York 10003 Brooklyn, New York <strong>11</strong>201<br />

(718) 855-9000<br />

.: 10924-6456<br />

So Ordered:


TMc:CCCjpk)<br />

4<strong>11</strong><strong>11</strong> 1<br />

WHEREFORE, defendant Consolidated Edison Company of New York, Inc.<br />

hereby requests summary judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law<br />

and Rules Section 3212, dismissing plaintiffs complaint against defendant Consolidated Edison<br />

Company of New York, Inc. with prejudice, and there being no opposition thereto,<br />

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross-claims<br />

against defendant Consolidated Edison Company of New York, Inc., be and the same are hereby<br />

dismissed with prejudice and without costs.<br />

Attorneys for Plaintiff<br />

700 Broadway<br />

New York, NY 100035<br />

York, Inc.<br />

41rving~lace F I L E D<br />

New York. NY 10003-3598<br />

SO ORDERED:<br />

Our File No<br />

S-4986-98


SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW Y OK<br />

COUNTY OF NEW YORK<br />

WHEREFORE, defendant Patterson-Kelley Company, sued herein as Patterson-Kelle!<br />

Division, hereby requests summary judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil<br />

Practice Law and Rules Section 3212, dismissing plaintiff's complaint against defendant<br />

Patterson-Kelley Division with prejudice, and there being no opposition thereto,<br />

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against<br />

defendant Patterson-Kelley Division, be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and<br />

without costs.<br />

Dated: New York, NY<br />

+/jL. , 20<strong>11</strong><br />

By: &W<br />

fllehd %WC/I,Esq.<br />

WEITZ & LUXENBERG, P.C.<br />

Attorneys for Plaintiff<br />

By:<br />

Samuel mdblatt, E<br />

Benjamin R. Dwyer<br />

NIXON PEABODY LLP<br />

Attorneys for Defendant,<br />

180 Maiden Lane Patterson-Kelley Company<br />

New York, NY 10038<br />

Key Towers at Fountain<br />

(212) 558-5500 40 Fountain Plaz Q<br />

Buffalo, NY 1420<br />

TUP<br />

53-8100<br />

APR 2 6 '20'<br />

SO ORDERED,<br />

13409973.1<br />

APR 15 20<strong>11</strong>


----"_""___________________I____________------------------------"---"-"---<br />

TMc:CCCjpk)<br />

4<strong>11</strong><strong>11</strong> 1<br />

a<br />

----_"-____-____________________________------<br />

WDEX NO.<br />

IN RE NEW YORK CITY ASBESTOS LITIGATION, <strong>11</strong>0289/98 an <strong>11</strong>1058/98<br />

ASSIGNED TO:<br />

THIS DOCUMENT RELATES TO:<br />

HON. SHERRY KLEIN HEITLER<br />

NO OPPOSITION SUMMARY<br />

WHEREFORE, defendant Consolidated Edison Company of New York, Tnc.<br />

hereby requests summary judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law<br />

and RuIes Section 3212, dismissing plaintiffs complaint against defendant Consolidated Edison<br />

Company of New York, Inc. with prejudice, and there being no opposition thereto,<br />

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross-claims<br />

against defendant Consolidated Edison Company of New York, Inc,, be and the same are hereby<br />

dismissed with prejudice and without costs.<br />

Attorneys for Plaintiff<br />

700 Broadway<br />

New York, NY 100035<br />

Edison Company of New<br />

New York, NY 10003-3598<br />

S-4986-98


SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK<br />

ALL COUNTIES WITHIN NEW YORK CITY<br />

X<br />

IN RE: NEW YORK COUNTY I.A.S. Part 30<br />

ASBESTOS LITIGATION<br />

(Judge Heitler)<br />

_____----------__l_-______________l__l<br />

X<br />

This Document Relates to: Index No.: <strong>11</strong>2919/98<br />

BRIAN J. MCGUIRE<br />

NO-OPPOSITION<br />

SUMMARY JUDGMENT<br />

__________----------___llll__<br />

NYCAL<br />

- against -<br />

Plaintiff,<br />

MOTION AND ORDER<br />

A.C. &<br />

S., INC., et al.,<br />

WHEREFORE, defendant BURNHAM LLC, hereby requests summar!,<br />

judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice LaL\ 7<br />

and Rules Section 53212, dismissing plaintiffs' Complaint against:<br />

defendant BURNHAM LLC, with prejudice, and there being nc<br />

opposition thereto,<br />

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims ano I<br />

cross claims against defendant BURNHAM LLC, be dismissed with<br />

prejudice and without costs.<br />

Attorneys for Plaintiff Attorneys for Defendant<br />

Brian J. McGuire<br />

Burn ham L LC<br />

700 Broadway, 6"h Floor 177 Montague Street<br />

New York, New York 10003 Brooklyn, New York <strong>11</strong>20 FI<br />

212-558-5500 (718) 855-9000<br />

Our File No.: <strong>11</strong>084-2<strong>11</strong>2 ApR 2 6<br />

23'<strong>11</strong><br />

D


-_l-_f----____________________l_ll____<br />

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK<br />

ALL COUNTIES WITHIN NEW YORK CITY<br />

_______l__lll________--___--_-----------<br />

X<br />

IN RE:<br />

NEW YORK COUNTY<br />

ASBESTOS LITIGATION<br />

X<br />

This Document Relates to:<br />

Ara Ne<strong>11</strong> Murphy, Individually, and Jan<br />

Marie Murphy as Executrix for the Estate<br />

of James F. Murphy,<br />

Plaintiffs,<br />

- against -<br />

A.C. & S.,<br />

Inc., et al.,<br />

NYCAL<br />

I.A.S. Part 30<br />

(Judge Heitler)<br />

Index No.: <strong>11</strong>3121/98<br />

NO OPPOSITION<br />

SUMMARY JUDGMENT<br />

MOTION AND ORDER<br />

Defendants.<br />

__________________-__________________ -X<br />

WHEREFORE, defendant Mario & DiBono Plastering Co. Inc.,<br />

hereby requests summary judgment in the above-entitled case,<br />

pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section §3212,<br />

dismissing plaintiffs' Complaint against defendant Mario E<br />

DiBono Plastering Co. Inc., with prejudice, and there being nc<br />

opposition thereto,<br />

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claimE<br />

and cross claims against defendant Mario & DiBono Plastering Co.<br />

Inc., be dismissed with prejudice and without cost E#=<br />

APR 2 6 20<strong>11</strong><br />

D<br />

Cugen and Dykman LLP<br />

Attorneys for Plaintiffs<br />

Attorneys for Defendant<br />

Ara Ne<strong>11</strong> Murphy, Individually Maxio & DiBono Plastering Co.<br />

and Jan Marie Murphy as<br />

Inc.<br />

Executrix for the Estate of 177 Montague Street<br />

James F. Murphy Brooklyn, New York <strong>11</strong>201<br />

700 Broadway, 6th Floor 5+:. a 00 0<br />

New York, New York 1000 e NO.: 10924-1831<br />

So Ordered:<br />

Hon. Sherry K. Heitler


SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK<br />

COUNTY OF NEW YORK<br />

IN RE: NEW YORK CITY<br />

ASBESTOS LITIGATION<br />

NYCAL<br />

I.A.S. Part 30<br />

CHARLES J. HENRY and MARILYN HENRY,<br />

Index No.:<br />

-against-<br />

Plaintiffs,<br />

NO OPPOSITION SUMMARY JUDGMENT<br />

MOTION AND ORDER<br />

A.C. &S. INC., et at. including,<br />

FOSTER WHEELER CORPORATION,<br />

Defendants.<br />

WHEREFORE, defendant FOSTER WHEELER, L.L.C. (sued herein as “FOSTER WHEELER<br />

CORPORATION”) hereby request summary judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil<br />

Practice Law and Rules Section 3212, dismissing plaintiffs’ complaint against defendant FOSTER<br />

WHEELER, L.L.C. with prejudice, and there being no opposition thereto,<br />

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against defendant<br />

FOSTER WHEELER, L.L.C. be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and without costs.<br />

Frank Ortiz, Esq.<br />

Weitz 8t Luxenberg, P.C.<br />

Attorney for Plain tffs<br />

700 Broadway<br />

New York, New York 1000<br />

Attorneys for Foster Wheeler, L. L.C.<br />

Three Gateway Center, 12fh Floor<br />

Newark, NJ 07102<br />

SO ORDERED,<br />

APR 2 6 20<strong>11</strong><br />

NEW YQRK<br />

COUNTY CLERKS OFFICE’<br />

NU341752vl


I.A.S. Part 30<br />

Hon. Sherry Klein Heitler, J.S.C.<br />

JOAN LEVESQUE as Administratrix for the Estate of JOSEPH<br />

LEVESQUE and JOAN LEVESQUE, Individually,<br />

Index No.:<br />

/\122034-1.<br />

-against-<br />

Plaintiffs,<br />

NO OPPOSITION SUMMARY JUDGMENT<br />

MOTION AND ORDER<br />

A.O. SMITH WATER PRODULTTS, et al, including,<br />

FOSTER WHEELER CORPORATION,<br />

Defendants.<br />

WHEREFORE, defendant FOSTER WHEELER, L.L.C. (sued herein as "FOSTER WHEELER<br />

CORPORATION") hereby request summary judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil<br />

Practice Law and Rules Section 3212, dismissing plaintiffs' complaint against defendant FOSTER<br />

WHEELER, L.L.C. with prejudice, and there being no opposition thereto,<br />

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against defendant<br />

FOSTER WHEELER, L.L.C, be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and without costs.<br />

Frank Ortiz, Esq.<br />

Weitz & Luxenberg, P.C.<br />

Attorney for Plaintvfs<br />

700 Broadway<br />

fi<br />

Dennis E. Vega, Esq.<br />

Sedgwick, Detert, Moran & Arnold, LLP<br />

Attorneys for Foster Wheeler, L. L.C.<br />

Three Gateway Center, 12fh Floor<br />

r i ~ YORK \ ~


SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK<br />

ALL COUNTIES WITHIN NEW YORK CITY<br />

_________________l__II_______________<br />

-X NYCAL<br />

IN RE: NEW YORK COUNTY I.A.S. Part 30<br />

ASBESTOS LITIGATION<br />

(Judge Heitler)<br />

-----l-------------____________f_f_l__<br />

X<br />

This Document Relates to: Index No.: 100050/99<br />

Mary Jean Massaro, Individually and as<br />

Administratrix for the Estate of Joseph<br />

A. Massaro Jr.,<br />

Plaintiff,<br />

- against - NO OPPOSITION<br />

SUMMARY JUDGMENT<br />

A.C. .& S., Inc., et al.,<br />

MOTION AND ORDER<br />

Defendants.<br />

--_-_------I-------_________________<br />

-X<br />

WHEREFORE, defendant Mario & DiBono Plastering Co. Inc.,<br />

hereby requests summary judgment in the above-entitled case,<br />

pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 53212,<br />

dismissing plaintiffs' Complaint against defendant Mario 6<br />

DiBono Plastering Co. Inc., with prejudice, and there being ncr<br />

opposition thereto,<br />

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims<br />

and cross claims against defendant Mario & DiBono Plastering Co<br />

i<br />

Inc., be dismissed with prejudice and without CostsF I L E 4<br />

Mary Jean Massaro, Individually Mario & DiBono Plastering Co.<br />

and as Administratrix for the Inc.<br />

Estate of John A. Massaro Jr. 177 Montague Street<br />

700 Broadway, 6th Floor Brooklyn, New York <strong>11</strong>201<br />

New York, New York 10003<br />

10924-6466<br />

So Ordered:<br />

Hon. Sherry K. Heitler


NYCAL<br />

I.A.S. Part 30<br />

Hon. Sherry Klein Heitler, J.S.C.<br />

ERNEST J. HORNEY, JR, and ROSEMARY HORNEY,<br />

Index No.:<br />

-against-<br />

Plaintiffs,<br />

NO OPPOSITION SUMMARY JUDGMENT<br />

MOTION AND ORDER<br />

A.O. SMITH WATER PRODUCTS, et al. including,<br />

FOSTER WHEELER CORPORATION,<br />

Defendants.<br />

WHEREFORE, defendant FOSTER WHEELER, L.L.C. (sued herein as “FOSTER WHEELER<br />

CORPORATION”) hereby request summary judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil<br />

Practice Law and Rules Section 3212, dismissing plaintiffs’ complaint against defendant FOSTER<br />

WHEELER, L.L.C. with prejudice, and there being no opposition thereto,<br />

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against defendant<br />

FOSTER WHEELER, L.L.C. be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and without costs.<br />

n-<br />

Frank Ortiz, Esq.<br />

Weitz & Luxenberg, P.C.<br />

Attorney for Plaintvfs<br />

700 Broadway<br />

New York, New York 1000<br />

SO ORDERED,<br />

Dennis E. V e g w<br />

Sedgwick, Detert, Moran & Arnold, LLP<br />

Attorneys for Foster Wheeler, L. L.C.<br />

Three Gateway Center, 12th Floor<br />

Newark, NJ 07102<br />

FILED<br />

APR 2 6 20<strong>11</strong><br />

NJ/34 I756v 1


SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK<br />

COUNTY OF NEW YORK<br />

LILLIAN P. CARPENTER, as Executrix for the<br />

Estate of GERALD CLAYTON CARPENTER,<br />

A.C. & S., INC., et al.,<br />

Plaintiffls),<br />

-against-<br />

: NYCAL<br />

: I.A.S. Part 30<br />

: (Hon. Sheny Klein Heitler)<br />

1 Index No.: 106083-99<br />

NO-OPPOSITION SUMMARY<br />

JUDGMENT MOTION AND<br />

: ORDER<br />

WHEREFORE, defendant CRANE CO. hereby requests summary judgment in the<br />

above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212, dismissing<br />

plaintiffs' complaint against defendant CRANE CO. with prejudice, and there being no<br />

opposition thereto,<br />

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against<br />

defendant CRANE CO. be, and the same are hereby, dismissed with prejudice and without costs,<br />

Dated: 3 \3@\ \\<br />

Newxork, New York<br />

Attorneys for Plaintiff(s)<br />

700 Broadway<br />

New York, NY 10003<br />

(212) 558-5500<br />

Kirst<br />

P<br />

Alford Kneis, Esq.<br />

K& GATESLLP<br />

At rneys for Defendant<br />

CRANE CO.<br />

599 Lexington Ave<br />

New York, NY 100


SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW Y ON<br />

COUNTY OF NEW YORK<br />

IN RE: NEW YORK CITY ASBESTOS LITIGATION<br />

FREDERICK A. TOLI and DOLORES IOLI,<br />

Plaintiff(s),<br />

-against-<br />

A.C, & S., INC., et al.,<br />

Defendants.<br />

* NYCAL<br />

: I.A,S, Part 30<br />

: (Hon. Sherry Klein Heihzr)<br />

: Index No: 10791 3-99<br />

NO-OPPOSITION SUMMARY<br />

JUDGMENT MOTION AND ORDER<br />

WHEREFORE, defendant CRANE CO. hereby requests summary judgment in the<br />

I<br />

above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212, dismissing<br />

plaintiffs' complaint against defendant CRANE CO. with prejudice, and there being no<br />

opposition thereto,<br />

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against<br />

defendant CRANE CO. be, and the same are hereby, dismissed with prejudice and without costs.<br />

Dated:<br />

3\3a\\\<br />

Frank Ortiz, Esq.<br />

Attorneys for Plaintiff(s)<br />

700 Broadway CRANE CO.<br />

New York, NY 10003 599 Lexington Avep e NEW \/ORK<br />

(212) 558-5500 New York, NY 1002bW CLERRS<br />

(2 12) 536-3900<br />

SO ORDERED,<br />

Hon. Sherry Klein Heitler<br />

^ .


SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK<br />

COUNTY OF NEW YORK<br />

IN RE: NEW YORK CITY ASBESTOS LITIGATION<br />

This Document Relates To:<br />

KENNETH J. GARY, as Personal * hTX7I- ~r<br />

1Y 1 LAL<br />

Representative for the Estate of JOHN GARY, : Part 3o<br />

and DEANNA GARY, Individually,<br />

(Hon. Sherry Klein Heitler)<br />

A.C. & S., INC., et al.,<br />

-against-<br />

Plaintiff(s),<br />

Defendants.<br />

Index No: <strong>11</strong>7282-99<br />

: NO-OPPOSITION SUMMARY<br />

JUDGMENT MOTION AND ORDER<br />

WHEREFORE, defendant CRANE CO. hereby requests summary judgment in the<br />

above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 32 12, dismissing<br />

plaintiffs' complaint against defendant CRANE CO. with prejudice, and there being no<br />

opposition thereto,<br />

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against<br />

defendant CRANE CO. be, and the same are hereby, dismissed with prejudice and without costs.<br />

Dated: 3 \ 3r~3 \ \ \<br />

New York. New York<br />

Attorneys for Plaintiff(s)<br />

700 Broadway<br />

New York, NY 10003<br />

Attorneys for Defendant<br />

CRANE CO.<br />

599 Lexington Avenue APR 2 6 20<strong>11</strong><br />

(212) 558-5500 New York, NY 10022-6030<br />

- (212) 536-3900<br />

SO ORDERED,<br />

Hon. Sherry Klein Heitler<br />

NEW YORK<br />

COUNTY CLERK'S OFFiCt


__________________II_________l_lr_______----------------------- X<br />

m. * UPR RE ME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK<br />

COUNTY OF NEW YORK<br />

________I_______________r_____r_________-----------"-----------<br />

IN RE:NEW YORK CITY<br />

ASBESTOS LITIGATION<br />

This Document Relates To:<br />

REGINA ACKERMAN, as Executrix of the<br />

Estate of FRANK J. COPPOLA,<br />

-against-<br />

Plaintiff,<br />

X<br />

s= ?/<br />

Index No. 99- 12 1 144<br />

NO OPPOSITION SUMMARY<br />

JUDGMENT MOTION<br />

AND ORDER<br />

L<br />

i<br />

WHEREFORE, defendant Maremont Corporation hereby requests summary judgment in<br />

the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212, dismissing<br />

plaintiffs complaint against defendant Marernont Corporation with prejudice, and there being no<br />

opposition thereto,<br />

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against<br />

defendant Maremont Corporation be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and<br />

without costs.<br />

Dated: New York, New York<br />

pfa- w-, 201 1<br />

<strong>11</strong>% -<br />

TJ&&/FZ. ,&OGC? I Esq. Peggy L. Pan, Esq.<br />

WEITZ & LUXENBERG, P.C.<br />

KASOWITZ, BENSON, TORRES &<br />

Attorneys for Plaintiff<br />

FRIEDMAN LLP<br />

700 Broadway AttorneysforDefindant 3 'C I E D<br />

New York, NY 10003<br />

1633 Broadway<br />

(212) 558-5500<br />

NewYork,New York 10019 APR<br />

--"(212) 20,,<br />

506-1700<br />

SO ORDERED,<br />

NEW YORH<br />

COUNTY CLERK'$QFF@@<br />

Hon. Sherry Klein Heitler<br />

APR 15 20<strong>11</strong><br />

I<br />

I


NYCAL<br />

I.A.S. Part 30<br />

Hon. Sherry Klein Heitler, J.S.C.<br />

COSMA LERUZIC, as Executrix for the Estate of PETER F.<br />

LERUZIC and COSMA LERUZIC, Individually,<br />

-against-<br />

Plaintiffs,<br />

NO OPPOSITION SUMMARY JUDGMENT<br />

MOTION AND ORDER<br />

A.O. SMITH WATER PRODUCE, et al. including,<br />

FOSTER WHEELER CORPORATION,<br />

Defendants.<br />

_____________""_rr______________________---------"-~--------------~--- X<br />

WHEREFORE, defendant FOSTER WHEELER, L.L.C. (sued herein as "FOSTER WHEELER<br />

CORPORATION") hereby request summary judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil<br />

Practice Law and Rules Section 3212, dismissing plaintiffs' complaint against defendant FOSTER<br />

WHEELER, L.L.C. with prejudice, and there being no opposition thereto,<br />

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against defendant<br />

FOSTER WHEELER, L.L.C. be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and without costs.<br />

- ...<br />

Frank Ortiz, Esq.<br />

Weitz & Luxenberg, P.C.<br />

Attorney for Plaintffs<br />

700 Broadway<br />

New York, New York 1000<br />

k<br />

Sedgwick, Dennis E. Vega, Detert, Esq. Moran & Arnold, LLP<br />

Attorneys for Faster Wheeler,, L. L.C.<br />

Three Gateway Center, 12'h Floor<br />

Newark, NJ 07102<br />

SO ORPERED,<br />

15 20<strong>11</strong><br />

NJD41757vl


SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK<br />

COUNTY OF NEW YORK<br />

PHYLLIS GACH, Individually and as Proposed<br />

Executrix for the Estate of MICHAEL GACH,<br />

A.C. & S., INC., et al.,<br />

Plaintiff(s),<br />

-against-<br />

Defendants.<br />

I.A.S. Part 30<br />

: (Hon. Sherry Klein Heitler)<br />

: Index No(s),: <strong>11</strong>2375-02;<br />

&Z%<br />

NO-OPPOSITION SUMMARY<br />

: JUDGMENT MOTION AND<br />

ORDER<br />

WHEREFORE, defendant CRANE CO. hereby requests summary judgment in the<br />

above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 32 12, dismissing<br />

plaintiffs complaint against defendant CRANE CO. with prejudice, and there being no<br />

opposition thereto,<br />

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against<br />

defendant CRANE CO. be, and the same are hereby, dismissed with prejudice and without costs.<br />

Dated: 3 \ 30 \ [\,<br />

ork, New York<br />

Attorneys for Plaintiff(s)<br />

700 Broadway CRANE CO.<br />

New York, NY 10003<br />

599 Lexington Aven<br />

(212) 558-5500<br />

New York, NY 10022<br />

(212) 536-3900<br />

n


SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK<br />

ALL COUNTIES WITHIN NEW YORK CITY<br />

------________________________I______<br />

-X<br />

IN RE:<br />

NEW YORK COUNTY<br />

ASBESTOS LITIGATION<br />

______________________I______________<br />

-X<br />

This Document Relates to:<br />

Janet W. Fitzgerald, as Executrix for<br />

the Estate of Adolph V. Weber,<br />

NYCAL<br />

I.A.S. Part 30<br />

(Judge Heitler)<br />

Index No.: 125761/99<br />

- against -<br />

A.C. & S., Inc., et al.,<br />

Plaintiff,<br />

NO OPPOSITION<br />

SUMMARY JUDGMENT<br />

MOTION AND ORDER<br />

Defendants.<br />

I______________________________I______<br />

X<br />

WHEREFORE, defendant Mario & DiBono Plastering Co. Inc.,<br />

hereby requests summary judgment in the above-entitled case,<br />

pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section §3212,<br />

dismissing plaintiffs' Complaint against defendant Mario 6<br />

DiBono Plastering Co.<br />

Inc., with prejudice, and there being nc<br />

opposition thereto,<br />

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims<br />

and<br />

Inc<br />

cross claims against defendant Mario & DiBono Plastering Co.<br />

, be dismissed with prejudice and without cos D<br />

Dated:<br />

Brooklyn, New York<br />

41 2 , 20<strong>11</strong><br />

3/yJ//<br />

SamGe1 M. Mdirowitz, Esq.<br />

Weitz & Luxenberg, P.C.<br />

len and D<br />

Attorneys for Plaintiff<br />

Janet W. Fitzgerald, as<br />

Mario & DiBono Plastering Co.<br />

Executrix for the Estate of Inc.<br />

Adolph V. Weber 177 Montague Street<br />

700 Broadway, 6th Floor Brooklyn, New York <strong>11</strong>201<br />

New York, New York 10003<br />

So Ordered:<br />

Hon. Sherry K. Heitler<br />

?'?q! 0924 - 6460


SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK<br />

COUNTY OF NEW YORK<br />

WHEREFORE, defendant Patterson-Kelley Company, sued herein as Patterson-Kelley<br />

Division, hereby requests summary judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil<br />

Practice Law and Rules Section 3212, dismissing plaintiff's complaint against defendant<br />

Patterson-Kelley Division with prejudice, and there being no opposition thereto,<br />

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against<br />

defendant Patterson-Kelley Division, be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and<br />

without costs.<br />

BY<br />

WEITZ & LUXENBERG, P.C.<br />

Attorneys for Plaintiff<br />

1 SO Maiden Lane<br />

New York, NY 10038<br />

Benjamin R. Dwyer Esq.<br />

NIXON PEABODY LLP<br />

Attorneys for Defendant,<br />

Patterson-Kelley<br />

Key Towers at Fount<br />

40 Fountain<br />

Buffalo, NY 14202<br />

(716) 853-8100<br />

APR 2 6 ""<br />

D<br />

Hon. Sherry Klein Heitler<br />

13381246 1<br />

APR 15 20<strong>11</strong>


SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK<br />

ALL COUNTIES WITHIN NEW YORK CITY<br />

NYCAL<br />

I.A.S. Part 30<br />

(Judge Heitler)<br />

Index No.: 100592/00<br />

- against -<br />

A.C. & S., Inc., et al.,<br />

Plaintiffs,<br />

NO OPPOSITION<br />

SUMMARY JUDGMENT<br />

MOTION AND ORDER<br />

Defendants.<br />

______________________<br />

- -X<br />

WHEREFORE, defendant Mario & DiBono Plastering Co. Inc.<br />

hereby requests summary judgment in the above-entitled case<br />

pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section §3212<br />

dismissing plaintiffs' Complaint against defendant Mario<br />

DiBono Plastering Co. Inc., with prejudice, and there being n<br />

opposition thereto,<br />

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claim<br />

and cross claims against defendant Mario & DiBono Plastering Co<br />

Inc., be dismissed with prejudice and without costs.<br />

Dated: 6 Et<br />

2 6 20<strong>11</strong><br />

Weitz & Luxenberg, P.C.<br />

Attorneys for Plaintiffs<br />

William T. Franklin and Anne L. Mario & DiBono Plastering Co.<br />

Frank1 in<br />

Inc.<br />

700 Broadway, 6th Floor 177 Montague Street<br />

New York, New York 10003 Brooklyn, New York <strong>11</strong>201<br />

8) 855-9000<br />

File No.: 10924-6462<br />

So Ordered:<br />

APR 15 20<strong>11</strong>


-------f-----l_____l-----------------<br />

L<br />

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK<br />

ALL COUNTIES WITHIN NEW YORK CITY<br />

-X<br />

IN RE: NEW YORK COUNTY<br />

ASBESTOS LITIGATION<br />

..................................... -X<br />

This Document Relates to:<br />

Charles A. Vitale, as Executor for the<br />

Estate of Wesley A. Schwartz,<br />

NY CAL<br />

I.A.S. Part 30<br />

(Judge Heitler)<br />

Index No.: 101760/00<br />

- against -<br />

A.C. & S. Inc. , et al. ,<br />

Plaintiff,<br />

NO OPPOSITION<br />

SUMMARY JUDGMENT<br />

MOTION AND ORDER<br />

WHEREFORE, defendant Mario &<br />

DiBono Plastering Co. Inc.,<br />

hereby requests summary judgment in the above-entitled case,<br />

pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section §3212,<br />

dismissing plaintiffs' Complaint against defendant Mario 6<br />

DiBono Plastering Co. Inc., with prejudice, and there being nc<br />

opposition thereto,<br />

ORDERED, that upon notice- to all co-defendants, all claim:<br />

and cross claims against defendant Mario & DiBono Plastering Co.<br />

Inc., be dismissed with prejudice and without costs<br />

Dated:<br />

Brooklyn, New York<br />

q(rr 20<strong>11</strong><br />

Weitz & Luxenberg, P.C.<br />

Attorneys for Plaintiff<br />

Charles A. Vitale, as Executor Mario & DiBono Plastering Co.<br />

for the Estate of Wesley A. Inc.<br />

Schwa rt z<br />

177 Montague Street<br />

700 Broadway, 6th Floor Brooklyn, New York <strong>11</strong>201<br />

New York, New York 1000 18) 855-9000<br />

r File No.: 10924-6458<br />

So Ordered:


-."--I^<br />

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK<br />

ALL COUNTIES WITHIN NEW YORK CITY<br />

_l_--_l____---------Ilf___________l___<br />

X NYCAL<br />

IN RE: NEW YORK COUNTY I.A.S. Part 30<br />

ASBESTOS LITIGATION<br />

(Judge Heitler)<br />

X<br />

This Document Relates to:<br />

Index No.: 102783/00<br />

THOMAS J. CRUGER, SR.<br />

NO-OPPOSITION<br />

SUMMARY JUDWNT<br />

Plaintiff,<br />

MOTION AND ORDER<br />

A.C. &<br />

- against -<br />

S., INC., et al.,<br />

Defendants.<br />

X<br />

I<br />

WHEREFORE, defendant BURNHAM LLC, hereby requests summary<br />

judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law<br />

and Rules Section §3212, dismissing plaintiffs' Complaint against<br />

defendant BURNHAM LLC, with prejudice, and there being no<br />

opposition thereto,<br />

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and<br />

cross claims against defendant BURNHAM LLC,<br />

prejudice and without costs.<br />

2 6 20<strong>11</strong><br />

FIE'<br />

Weitz 6r Luxenberg,<br />

Attorneys for Plaintiff Attorneys for Defendant<br />

Thomas J, Cxuger, Sr.<br />

Burn ham 1;LC<br />

700 Broadway, 6'h Floor 177 Montague Street<br />

New York, New York 10003 Brooklyn, New York <strong>11</strong>201<br />

212-558-5500 (718) 855-9000<br />

Our File No.: <strong>11</strong>084-2176<br />

SO ORDERED:<br />

Hon. Sherry K. Heitler


SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK<br />

ALL COUNTIES WITHIN NEW YORK CITY<br />

...................................... X NYCAL<br />

IN RE: NEW YORK COUNTY I.A.S. Part 30<br />

ASBESTOS LITIGATION<br />

(Judge Heitler)<br />

-__llll______________--------------------<br />

X<br />

This Document Relates to: Index No.: 1<strong>04</strong>471/00<br />

DUANE BROUGHTON<br />

NO-OPPOSITION<br />

SUMMARY JUDGMENT<br />

Plaintiff,<br />

MOTION AND ORDER<br />

- against -<br />

A.C. & S., INC., et al.,<br />

WHEREFORE, defendant BURNHAM LLC, hereby requests summarj7<br />

judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law<br />

and Rules Section 53212, dismissing plaintiffs' Complaint against:<br />

defendant BURNHAM LLC, with prejudice, and there being no<br />

opposition thereto,<br />

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and<br />

cross claims against defendant BURNHAM LLC, be dismissed with<br />

prejudice and without costs.


______f-llll---lll--l-----l-ll---------------<br />

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK<br />

ALL COUNTIES WITHIN NEW YORK CITY<br />

X<br />

IN RE: NEW YORK COUNTY<br />

ASBESTOS LITIGATION<br />

X<br />

-_-____________________________-_--_--<br />

This Document Relates to:<br />

CARLO BRISCOLI<br />

Plaintiff,<br />

NYCAL<br />

I.A.S. Part 30<br />

(Judge Heitler)<br />

Index No.: 1<strong>04</strong>483/00<br />

NO-OPPOSITION<br />

SUMMARY JUDGMENT<br />

MOTION AND ORDER<br />

- against -<br />

A.C. & S., INC., et al.,<br />

WHEREFORE, defendant BURNHAM LLC,<br />

hereby requests summar<br />

judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice La<br />

and Rules Section 53212, dismissing plaintiffs' Complaint agains<br />

defendant BURNHAM LLC, with prejudice, and<br />

there being n<br />

opposition thereto,<br />

ORDERED, that upon notice ta all co-defendants, all claims an<br />

cross claims against defendant BURNHAM LLC, be dismissed wit<br />

prejudice and without costs.<br />

Dated: Broqkbyn, New York<br />

J<br />

Frank Ortiz, Es<br />

Weitz & Luxenbe<br />

Attorneys for P<br />

Carlo Bri scol i<br />

700 Broadway, 6th Floor<br />

New York, New York 10003<br />

212-558-5500<br />

Cullen and Dykman LLP<br />

Attorneys for Defendant<br />

Bu xn ham L LC<br />

177 Montague Street<br />

Brooklyn, New YorkrA,l$2Q1<br />

(718) 855-9000 kd<br />

Our File No.: <strong>11</strong>084-2327<br />

SO ORDERED:<br />

_e_-- "<br />

Hon. Sherry I?: Heitler


SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK<br />

ALL COUNTIES WITHIN NEW YORK CITY<br />

IN RE:<br />

NEW YORK COUNTY<br />

ASBESTOS LITIGATION<br />

This Document Relates to:<br />

Rosemary Schiano, Individually and as<br />

Executrix for the Estate of Daniel<br />

Schiano,<br />

Plaintiff,<br />

- against -<br />

A.C. &i S., Inc., et al.,<br />

NYCAL<br />

I.A.S. Part 30<br />

(Judge Heitler)<br />

Index No.: 105249/00<br />

NO OPPOSITION<br />

SUMMARY JUDGMENT<br />

MOTION AND ORDER<br />

Defendants.<br />

______-----________------------------<br />

-X<br />

WHEREFORE, defendant Mario & DiBono Plastering Co. Inc.<br />

hereby requests summary judgment in the above-entitled case<br />

pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section §3212<br />

dismissing plaintiffs' Complaint against defendant Mario 1<br />

DiBono Plastering Co. Inc., with prejudice, and there being nc<br />

opposition thereto,<br />

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claimt<br />

and cross claims against defendant Mario & DiBono Plastering Co<br />

Inc., be dismissed with prejudice and without c0sts.F 1 1<br />

APR 2 6 201'1<br />

Qdniel P. hlouin, Esq.<br />

Weitz & Luxenberg, P.C.<br />

Cuwen and Dykrnan LLP<br />

Attorneys for Plaintiff<br />

Attorneys for Defendant<br />

Rosemary Schiano, Individually Mario & DiBono Plastering Co.<br />

and as Executrix for the Estate Inc.<br />

of Daniel Schiano<br />

177 Montague Street<br />

700 Broadway, 6th Floor Brooklyn, New York <strong>11</strong>201<br />

New York, New York 10003 18) 855-9000<br />

r File No.: 10924-6305<br />

So Ordered:<br />

AfR 15 28<strong>11</strong>


~ .<br />

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK<br />

ALL COUNTIES WITHIN NEW YORK CITY<br />

X NYCAL<br />

IN RE: NEW YORK COUNTY I.A.S. Part 30<br />

ASBESTOS LITIGATION<br />

(Judge Heitler)<br />

___ll--l---____-----____l______<br />

X<br />

This Document Relates to:<br />

RONALD R. KENT<br />

- against -<br />

Plaintiff,<br />

Index No.: 105342/00<br />

NO-OPPOSITION<br />

SUMMARY JUDGMENT<br />

MOTION AND ORDER<br />

A.C. &<br />

S., INC., et al.,<br />

Defendants.<br />

X<br />

WHEREFORE, defendant BURNHAM LLC, hereby requests summary<br />

judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law<br />

and Rules Section §3212, dismissing plaintiffs' Complaint against:<br />

defendant BURNHAM LLC, with prejudice, and there being no<br />

opposition thereto,<br />

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and<br />

cross claims against defendant BURNHAM LLC, be dismissed with<br />

prejudice and without costs.<br />

w.v%,f?.<br />

Frank Ortiz, Esq.<br />

\. '1<br />

Weitz & Luxenberg, P.C. x*.?<br />

Attorneys for Plaintiff<br />

Ronald R. Kent<br />

700 Broadway, 6th Floor<br />

New York, New York 10003<br />

212-558-5500<br />

Cullen and Dykman LLP<br />

Attorneys for Defendant<br />

Busnham LLC<br />

177 Montague Street<br />

Brooklyn, New York<br />

(718) 855-9000<br />

Our File No.: <strong>11</strong>084-1<br />

2 6 20''<br />

SO ORDERED:<br />

-<br />

Hon. Sherry K. Heitler


-<br />

IN RE NEW YORK CITY ASBESTOS LITIGATION,<br />

THIS DOCWmNT WLATES TO:<br />

ALVIN E. EHL .<br />

INDEX NO.<br />

105849/00<br />

ASSIGNED TO:<br />

HON. SHERRY KLEIN HEITLER<br />

NO OPPOSITION SUMMARY<br />

JUDGMENT MOTION AND<br />

ORDER<br />

WHEREFORE, defmdant Consolidated Edison Company of New York, Xnc.<br />

hereby requests immmary judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law<br />

and Rules Section 3212, dismissing plaintiff's complaint against defendant Consolidated Edison<br />

Company of New York, Inc. with prejudice, and #ere being no opposition thereto,<br />

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross-claims<br />

against defendant Consolidated Edisan Company of New York, Inc., be and the same are hereby<br />

- - - - I--_ - " - .. - - -<br />

dismissed with prejudice and without costs.<br />

)UT File No<br />

4316-00<br />

€80 Maiden Lane<br />

New York, NY 10038-4925<br />

SO ORDERED:<br />

Consolidakh'kdison Company of New<br />

York, Inc.<br />

4 Irving Place<br />

New York, NY 10003-3598<br />

FILED<br />

APR 2 6 20<strong>11</strong>


__________--f--l----------------------<br />

X<br />

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK<br />

ALL COUNTIES WITHIN NEW YORK CITY<br />

X NYCAL<br />

IN RE: NEW YQRK COUNTY I.A.S. Part 30<br />

ASBESTOS LITIGATION<br />

___ll----l---_-____-------------------<br />

X<br />

(Judge Heitler)<br />

This Document Relates to:<br />

EDWARD J. FERGUSON<br />

Index No.: 105774/00<br />

Plaintiff ,<br />

NO-OPPOSITION<br />

SUMMARY JUDGMENT<br />

MOTION AND ORDER<br />

- against -<br />

A.C. &<br />

S., INC., et al.,<br />

Defendants.<br />

WHEREFORE, defendant BURNHAM LLC, hereby requests summar!,<br />

judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Lai!<br />

and Rules Section 53212, dismissing plaintiffs' Complaint against:<br />

defendant BURNHAM LLC, with prejudice, and there being nc<br />

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims an<br />

cross claims against defendant BURNHAM LLC, be dismissed wit<br />

prejudice and without costs.<br />

n, New York<br />

Weitz & Luxenberg<br />

Attorneys for Plaintiff Attorneys for Defendant<br />

Edward J. FeKguSOn<br />

Bum h am L L C<br />

700 Broadway, 6t'' Floor 177 Montague Street<br />

New York, New York 10003 Brooklyn, New Yorj jlEIE<br />

212-558-5500 (718) 855-9000<br />

Our File No.: <strong>11</strong> 84-2 4<br />

SO ORDERED:<br />

Hon. Sherry KFHeitler


SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK<br />

COUNTY OF NEW YORK<br />

PHYLLIS GACH, Individually and as Proposed<br />

Executrix for the Estate of MICHAEL GACH,<br />

A.C. & S., INC., et al.,<br />

Plaintiff( s),<br />

-against-<br />

Defendants.<br />

: I.A.S. Part 30<br />

' (Hon. Sherry Klein Heitler)<br />

: Index No(s).$237iOZj<br />

05977-00.<br />

121985-99<br />

NO-OPPOSITION SUMMARY<br />

' JUDGMENT MOTION AND<br />

: ORDER<br />

WHEREFORE, defendant CRANE CO. hereby requests summary judgment in the<br />

above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 32 12, dismissing<br />

plaintiffs complaint against defendant CRANE CO. with prejudice, and there being no<br />

opposition thereto,<br />

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against<br />

defendant CRANE CO. be, and the same are hereby, dismissed with prejudice and without costs.<br />

Dated: 3 \30\ I\<br />

Neuork, New York<br />

WEITZ & LUXENBERG, P.C.<br />

Attorneys for Plaintiff(s)<br />

700 Broadway<br />

New York, NY 10003<br />

(2 12) 558-5500<br />

CRANE CO.<br />

599 Lexington Aven<br />

New York, NY 10022


I ’<br />

~<br />

__________---------__I________________<br />

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK<br />

ALL COUNTIES WITHIN NEW YORK CITY<br />

-_-_-_-----________-------------------<br />

X NYCAL<br />

IN RE: NEW YORK COUNTY I.A.S. Part 30<br />

ASBESTOS LITIGATION<br />

(Judge Heitler)<br />

X<br />

This Document Relates to:<br />

RONALD W. KLOPFER<br />

Index No.: 106483/00<br />

NO-OPPOSITION<br />

SUMMARY JUDGbENT<br />

Plaintiff,<br />

MOTION AND ORDER<br />

- against -<br />

I<br />

A.C. & S., INC., et al.,<br />

Defendants.<br />

-_______-__________-------------------<br />

WHEREFOREf defendant BURNHAM LLC, hereby requests summary<br />

X<br />

I<br />

I<br />

judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law<br />

and Rules Section 53212, dismissing plaintiffs’ Complaint against:<br />

defendant BURNHAM LLC, with prejudice, and there being no<br />

opposition thereto,<br />

ORDERED,<br />

that upon notice to a<strong>11</strong> co-defendants, all claims and<br />

cross claims against defendant BURNHAM LLC, be dismissed with<br />

rk<br />

<strong>11</strong><br />

T<br />

Frank Ortiz, Esq.<br />

Weitz & Luxenberg, P.C.<br />

Attorneys for Plaintiff<br />

Ronald W. Klopfer<br />

700 Broadway, 6th Floor<br />

New York, New York 10003<br />

212-558-5500<br />

Cullen and Dykman LLP<br />

Attorneys for Defendant<br />

Burnham LLC<br />

177 Montague Street<br />

Brooklyn, New York <strong>11</strong>201<br />

(718) 855-9000<br />

Our File No. :<br />

APR 2 6 20<strong>11</strong>


SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK<br />

ALL COUNTIES WITHIN NEW YORK CITY<br />

..................................... -X<br />

IN RE: NEW YORK COUNTY<br />

ASBESTOS LITIGATION<br />

..................................... -X<br />

This Document Relates to:<br />

Barbara J. Klopfer, Individually and as<br />

Executrix for the Estate of Ronald W.<br />

Klopf er ,<br />

Plaintiff,<br />

- against -<br />

A.C. & S., Inc., et al.,<br />

NYCAL<br />

I.A.S. Part 30<br />

(Judge Heitler)<br />

Index No.: 106483/00<br />

NO OPPOSITION<br />

SUMMARY JUDGMENT<br />

MOTION 2WD ORDER<br />

WHEREFORE, defendant Mario &<br />

DiBono Plastering Co. Inc.<br />

hereby requests summary judgment in the above-entitled case<br />

pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section §3212<br />

dismissing plaintiffs' Complaint against defendant Mario<br />

DiBono Plastering Co. Inc., with prejudice, and there being n<br />

opposition thereto,<br />

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claim<br />

and cross claims against defendant Mario & DiBon<br />

Inc., be dismissed with prejudice and without co<br />

Dated:<br />

Brooklyn, New York<br />

, 20<strong>11</strong><br />

Weitz & Luxenberg, P.C.<br />

Attorneys for Plaintiff<br />

Barbara J. Klopfer,<br />

Mario & DiBono Plastering Co.<br />

Individually and as Executrix Inc.<br />

for the Estate of Ronald W. 177 Montague Street<br />

K1 opf er Brooklyn, New York <strong>11</strong>201<br />

700 Broadway, 6th Floor<br />

New York, New York 10003 NO. : 10924-6464<br />

So Ordered:


SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK<br />

COlJNTY OF NEW YON<br />

IN RE: NEW YORK COUNTY<br />

! NYCAL<br />

ASBESTOS LITIGATION<br />

i I.A.S. Part 30<br />

(Heitler, J.)<br />

THIS DOCUMENT REFERS TO:<br />

f Index No.: 107449/00<br />

ANTONIO MIGLXOZI AND MARIA M.<br />

MIGLIOZI,<br />

; NO OPPOSITION<br />

Plaintiffs, i SUMMARY JUDGMENT<br />

-againstj<br />

MOTION AND ORDER<br />

~.---<br />

A. C. & $., INC., et al.,<br />

Defendants.<br />

j<br />

WHEREFORE, defendant, Oakfabco, Inc., hereby requests summary judgment in the<br />

above entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules 5 3212, dismissing plaintiffs’<br />

complaint against defendant, Oakfabco, Inc., with prejudice in this action, and there being no<br />

opposition thereto,<br />

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against<br />

defendant, Oakfabco, Tnc., be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and without<br />

costs.<br />

Dated: New York, New York<br />

Robert Darish, Esq.<br />

Attorney for Defendant<br />

Oakfabco, Inc.<br />

MCGIVNEY & KLUGER, P.C.<br />

80 Broad Street-Suite 2300<br />

New York, New York 100<strong>04</strong><br />

(212) 509-3456<br />

Antonio Migliozzi and Maria M.<br />

WElTZ & LWXENBERG, P.C.<br />

700 Broadway<br />

N0<strong>04</strong><strong>04</strong>74-1


SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK<br />

COUNTY OF NEW YORK<br />

IN RE: NEW YORK CITY ASBESTOS LITIGATION<br />

ANTONIO MIGLIOZZT and MARIA M.<br />

MIGLIOZZI,<br />

NYCAL<br />

1 I.A.S. Part 30<br />

: (Hon. Sherry Klein Heitler)<br />

Plaintiff( s),<br />

: Index No(s).: 107449-00<br />

A.C. & S., INC., et al,,<br />

-against-<br />

: NO-OPPOSITION SUMMARY<br />

: JUDGMENT MOTION AND<br />

1 ORDER<br />

WHEREFORE, defendant CRANE CO. hereby requests summary judgment in the<br />

above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 32 12, dismissing<br />

plaintiffs' complaint against defendant CRANE CO. with prejudice, and there being no<br />

opposition thereto,<br />

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against<br />

defendant CRANE CO. be, and the same are hereby, dismissed with prejudice and without costs.<br />

Dated: 3 \3 o\ \\<br />

New<br />

ork, New York<br />

FILED<br />

Th<br />

Kirste K&L ATESLLP Alford Kneis, Esq. APR MEW 2 YORK 6 20<strong>11</strong><br />

yWEITZ Frank Ortiz, & LUXENBERG,<br />

Esq.<br />

Attorneys for Plaintiff(s)<br />

Atto eys for DefendmUNfY CLERKS OFFICE<br />

700 Broadway CRANE CO.<br />

New York, NY 10003<br />

599 Lexington Avenue<br />

(212) 558-5500<br />

New York, NY 10022<br />

(212) 536-3900<br />

SO ORDERED,


-<br />

I<br />

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK<br />

COUNTY OF NEW YORK I<br />

IN RE: NEW YON COUNTY<br />

NYCAL<br />

ASBESTOS LITIGATION<br />

I.A.S. Part 30<br />

(Heitler, J.)<br />

/<br />

THIS DOCUMENT REFERS TO:<br />

ANTONIO MIGLIOZI AND MARIA M.<br />

MIGLIOZI,<br />

-against-<br />

A. C. & S., INC., et al.,<br />

Plaintiffs,<br />

Index No.: I07449/00<br />

NO OPPOSITION<br />

SUMMARY JUDGMENT<br />

MOTION AND O E R<br />

Defendants.<br />

i<br />

WHEREFORE, defendant, Treadwell Corporation, hereby requests summary judgment in<br />

the above entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules 0 3212, dismissing plaintiffs'<br />

complaint against defendant, Treadwell Corporation, with prejudice in this action, and there<br />

being no opposition thereto,<br />

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against<br />

defendant, Treadwell Corporation, be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and<br />

without costs.<br />

Dated: New York, New York<br />

).I<br />

Attorney for Defendant<br />

Treadwell Corporation<br />

MCGIVNEY & ~LUGER, P.C.<br />

WEITZ & LUXENBERG, P.C.<br />

80 Broad Street-Suite 2300<br />

700 Broadway<br />

New York, New York 100<strong>04</strong><br />

New York, New York<br />

APR 2 6 2t)"<br />

10003<br />

(212) 509-3456 (212) 558-5500<br />

h1C-W YORK<br />

SO ORDERED,<br />

couNTy CLERKS OFF"'<br />

Hon. SKdy Klein Heitler 1235-1 4382<br />

NOQ4<strong>04</strong>78-1<br />

APR 15'20<strong>11</strong>


This Document Relates To:<br />

PATRICIA PALADINO, as Administratrix for the<br />

Estate of WILLIAM PHILIP ALLOCA,<br />

A.C. & S., INC., et al.,<br />

Plaintiff(s),<br />

-against-<br />

Defendants.<br />

NYCAL<br />

I.A.S. Part 30<br />

(Hon, Sherry Klein Heitler)<br />

Index No(s).: 108356-00<br />

NO-OPPOSITION SUMMARY<br />

JUDGMENT MOTION AND<br />

ORDER<br />

WHEREFORE, defendant CRANE CO. hereby requests summary judgment in the<br />

above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 32 12, dismissing<br />

plaintiffs complaint against defendant CRANE CO. with prejudice, and there being no<br />

opposition thereto,<br />

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against<br />

defendant CRANE CO. be, and the same are hereby, dismissed with prejudice and without costs.<br />

Dated: 3 \>e\ I\<br />

New York, New York<br />

n<br />

Frank Ortiz, Esq. \<br />

WEITZ & LUXENBERG, P.C.<br />

Attorneys for Plaintiff(s)<br />

700 Broadway<br />

New York, NY 10003<br />

><br />

Kirsteq/Alford Kneis, Esq.<br />

F! D<br />

CRANE CO.<br />

599 Lexington Avenue<br />

(212) 558-5500 NewYork,NY 10022 APR 2 6 20''<br />

(212) 536-3900<br />

p ::*rgj YORK<br />

SO ORDERED, (-w i \ CLERKS OFFICE<br />

%<br />

Hon. Sherry Klely Heitler<br />

APR 15 20<strong>11</strong>


SUPREME COURT OF THE STA'TEQF NEW YORK<br />

COUNTY OF NEW YORK<br />

IN RE: NEW YOKK COUNTY<br />

! NYCAL<br />

ASBESTOS LITIGATION<br />

i 1.A.S. Part 30<br />

i (Heitler, J.)<br />

-i- 1-1 I s u oc u M EEREFEKS<br />

TO :<br />

0<br />

j lndex No.: 1 15836/00, 08386/00<br />

i<br />

MARY ICOMANO, INDIVIDUALLY AND AS<br />

EXECUTRIX FOR TIHE ESTATE OF GIN0<br />

KOMANO, \ NO OPPOSITION<br />

-against-<br />

A. C. & S., INC., et d.,<br />

Plaintiffs,<br />

i<br />

SUMMARY JUDGMENT<br />

i MOTION AND ORDER<br />

Defendants.<br />

J<br />

WHEREFORE, defendant, Treadwell Corporation, hereby requests summary judgment in<br />

the above entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules 5 3212, dismissing plaintiffs'<br />

complaint against defendant, Treadwell Corporation, with prejudice in this action, and there<br />

being 'no opposition thereto,<br />

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims agains#<br />

defendant, Treadwell Corporation, be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and<br />

without costs.<br />

Attorney for Defendant<br />

Treadwell Corporation<br />

MCGIVNEY & KLUGER, P.C.<br />

SO Broad Street-Suite 2300<br />

New York, New York 100<strong>04</strong><br />

(212) 509-3456<br />

700 Broadway<br />

Hon. Sherry Klein Heitler<br />

NO<strong>04</strong><strong>04</strong>78- 1


SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK<br />

COUNTY OF NEW YORK<br />

1N RE: NEW YORK COUNTY<br />

j NYCAL<br />

ASBESTOS LlTIGATlON<br />

: I.A.S. Part 30<br />

(H ei t 1 er , J .)<br />

THlS DOCUMENT REFERS TO:<br />

Index No.: <strong>11</strong>5836/00,<br />

MARY ROMANO, INDIVIDUALLY AND AS<br />

EXECUTRTX FOR THE ESTATE OF GIN0<br />

ROMANO,<br />

NO OPPOSITION<br />

SUMMARY JUDGMENT<br />

Plaintiffs, MOTION AND ORDER<br />

-against-<br />

A. C. & S., INC., etal.,<br />

Defendants.<br />

WHEREFORE, defendant, Safeguard Industrial Equipment Go., hereby requests<br />

summary judgment in the above entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules 6 3212,<br />

dismissing plaintiffs' complaint against defendant, Safeguard Industrial Equipment Co., with<br />

prejudice in this action, and there being no opposition thereto,<br />

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against<br />

defendant, Safeguard Industrial Equipment Co., be and the same are hereby dismissed with<br />

prejudice and without costs.<br />

Dated: New York, New Yoxk -<br />

Matthe!& bc Shrnpar, Esq.<br />

Attorney fo>E&fendant Attorney for Plaintiffs f<br />

Safeguard Industrial Equipment CO.<br />

Estate of Gin0 Romano<br />

I P.0<br />

MCGIVNEY & KLUGER, P.C.<br />

WEITZ & LUXENBERG, P.C.<br />

80 Broad Street-Suite 2300<br />

700 Broadway<br />

New York, New York 100<strong>04</strong><br />

New York, New York 10003 A?fi 2 6 Zoll<br />

*-+%*_ (212)<br />

~ 558-5500<br />

(212) 509-3456 CTA,/,//-<br />

SO ORDERED,<br />

I<br />

Hon. S h h Klein 1 Ieitler<br />

324-5095C<br />

N0<strong>04</strong><strong>04</strong>78-1


NYCAL<br />

I.A.S. Part 30<br />

Hon. Sherry Klein Heitler, J.S.C.<br />

FRANK 1. CAMARDELLA,<br />

Index No.: 108846-2000<br />

-against-<br />

AX. &S. INC., et al. including,<br />

FOSTER WHEELER CORPORATION,<br />

Plaintiff,<br />

NO OPPOSITION SUMMARY JUDGMENT<br />

MOTION AND ORDER<br />

Defendants.<br />

WHEREFORE, defendant FOSTER WHEELER, L.L.C. (sued herein as "FOSTER WHEELER<br />

CORPORATION") hereby request summary judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil<br />

Practice Law and Rules Section 3212, dismissing plaintiffs' complaint against defendant FOSTER<br />

WHEELER, L.L.C. with prejudice, and there being no opposition thereto,<br />

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against defendant<br />

FOSTER WHEELER, L.L.C. be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and without costs.<br />

Frank Ortiz, Esq.<br />

Weitt & Luxenberg, P.C.<br />

Attorney for Plain tvfs<br />

700 Broadway<br />

New York, New York 10003<br />

Attorneys for Foster Wheeler, L. L.C.<br />

Three Gateway Center, 12fh Floor<br />

Newark, NJ 07102<br />

SO ORDERED,<br />

clou@<br />

NJ/341734vl


SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK<br />

COUNTY OF NEW YORK<br />

CAROL NICOLAIDIS, as Administratrix for the : NYCAL<br />

Estate of JAMES NICOLAIDIS, and CAROL : I.A.S. Part 30<br />

NICOLAIDIS, Individually,<br />

: (Hon. Sherry Klein Heitler)<br />

A.C. & S., INC,, et al.,<br />

Plaintiff(s),<br />

-against-<br />

: Index No. 109064-00<br />

NO-OPPOSITION SUMMARY<br />

: JUDGMENT MOTION AND<br />

: ORDER<br />

WHEREFORE, defendant CRANE CO. hereby requests summary judgment in the<br />

above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212, dismissing<br />

plaintiffs' complaint against defendant CRANE CO. with prejudice, and there being no<br />

opposition thereto,<br />

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against<br />

defendant CRANE CO. be, and the same are hereby, dismissed with prejudice and without costs.<br />

Dated: -3 \3 e\ \\<br />

w<br />

New York. New York<br />

n'<br />

Frank Ortiz. Esa.<br />

WEITZ & LUXENBERG-?<br />

Attorneys for Plaintiff(s)<br />

Kirstepf Alford Kneis, Esq.<br />

700 Broadway CRANE CO.<br />

New York, NY 10003<br />

(212) 558-5500<br />

599 Lexington Avenue<br />

New York, NY 10022<br />

+ . (212) 536-3900<br />

YORK<br />

CLERK'S OFF'='<br />

SO ORDERED,<br />

Hon, Sherry Klein Heitler<br />

APR 15 ?Ojf


SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK<br />

COUNTY OF NEW YORK<br />

_____________"_r__l_r___________________----------------"-"------<br />

IN RE: NEW YORK CITY ASBESTOS LITIGATION<br />

_____________<strong>11</strong>_1_1____ll__l_l_lll___lr_-------------------------<br />

X<br />

This Document Relates To:<br />

RUTH MCDADE, as Executrix for the Estate of : NYCAL<br />

CORNELIUS FRANCIS MCDADE, and RUTH : I.A.S, Part 30<br />

MCDADE, Individually,<br />

: (Hon. Sherry Klein Heitler)<br />

X<br />

A.C. & S., INC., et al.,<br />

Plaintiff(s),<br />

-against-<br />

: Index No(s).: 109413-00<br />

NO-OPPOSITION SUMMARY<br />

: JUDGMENT MOTION AND<br />

: ORDER<br />

WHEREFORE, defendant CRANE CO. hereby requests summary judgment in the<br />

above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 32 12, dismissing<br />

plaintiffs complaint against defendant CRANE CO. with prejudice, and there being no<br />

opposition thereto,<br />

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against<br />

defendant CRANE CO. be, and the same are hereby, dismissed with prejudice and without costs.<br />

Dated: 3 \,3 O\ \\-<br />

New Yxk, New York<br />

Attorneys for Plaintiff(s)<br />

700 Broadway<br />

New York, NY 10003<br />

Atdrneys for Defendant<br />

CRANE CO.<br />

NEW YORK<br />

599 Lexington Avenue SOUNTY CERK'S OFFEE<br />

Hon. Sherry Klein Heitler<br />

APR 15 20<strong>11</strong>


_I_l____llf_-_-____flll-----------------<br />

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK<br />

ALL COUNTIES WITHIN NEW YORK CITY<br />

-X<br />

IN RE: NEW YORK COUNTY<br />

ASBESTOS LITIGATION<br />

_________________II_II___________<br />

-X<br />

This Document Relates to:<br />

Judith L. Mathis, Individually and as<br />

Executrix for the Estate of John L.<br />

Mathis,<br />

Plaintiff,<br />

- against -<br />

A.C. & S., Inc., et al.,<br />

Defendants.<br />

NYCAL<br />

I.A.S. Part 30<br />

(Judge Heitler)<br />

Index No.: 109431/00<br />

NO OPPOSITION<br />

SUMMARY JUDGMENT<br />

MOTION AND ORDER<br />

WHEREFORE, defendant Mario &<br />

DiBono Plastering Co. Inc.<br />

hereby requests summary judgment in the above-entitled case<br />

pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 53212<br />

dismissing plaintiffs' Complaint against defendant Mario<br />

DiBono Plastering Co. Inc., with prejudice, and there being n<br />

opposition thereto,<br />

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claim<br />

and cross claims against defendant Mario & DiBono Plastering Co<br />

Inc., be dismissed with prejudice and without cost<br />

$I<br />

Dated: Brooklyn, New York<br />

4lr-L , 20<strong>11</strong><br />

\\<br />

PR 2 6 20<strong>11</strong><br />

Michael Fanklli, Esq.<br />

Weitz & Luxenberg, P.C.<br />

CLERKS OFF<br />

Attorneys for Plaintiff<br />

dtorneys for Defendant<br />

Judith L. Mathis, Individually Mario & DiBono Plastering Co.<br />

and as Executrix for the Estate Inc.<br />

of John L. Mathis<br />

177 Montague Street<br />

700 Broadway, 6th Floor Brooklyn, New York <strong>11</strong>201<br />

New York, New York 10003 18) 855-9000<br />

r File No.: 10924-6467<br />

So Ordered: AVR 15 20<strong>11</strong><br />

F


SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK<br />

ALL COUNTIES WITHIN NEW YORK CITY<br />

...................................... X NYCAL<br />

IN RE: NEW YORK COUNTY I.A.S. Part 30<br />

ASBESTOS LITIGATION<br />

(Judge Heitler)<br />

--_-__---_---------------------------- X<br />

This Document Relates to: Index No. : 109491/00<br />

GEORGE P. MCGOFF<br />

NO-OPPOSITION<br />

- against -<br />

A.C. & S., INC., et al.,<br />

Plaintiff,<br />

Defendants.<br />

-----__-lf--l_________________________<br />

X<br />

SUMMARY JUDGMENT<br />

MOTION AND ORDER<br />

WHEREFORE, defendant BURNHAM LLC, hereby requests summary<br />

judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law<br />

and Rules Section 53212, dismissing plaintiffs' Complaint agains-:<br />

defendant<br />

BURNHAM LLC, with prejudice, and there being no<br />

opposition thereto,<br />

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and<br />

cross claims against defendant BURNHAM LLC, be dismissed with<br />

prejudice and without costs.<br />

Weitz & Luxenberg, P.C.<br />

Attorneys for Plaintiff Attorneys for Defendant<br />

George P. McGoff<br />

Burnham LLC<br />

700 Broadway, 6th Floor 177 Montague Street<br />


SUPREME COURT OF THE S'I'ATE OF NEW YORK<br />

COUNTY OF NEW YOKK<br />

IN RE: NEW YORK COUNTY<br />

NYCAL<br />

ASBESTOS LlTIGATION<br />

I.A.S. Part 30<br />

(Heitler, J.)<br />

THIS DOCUMENT REFERS TO:<br />

Index No.: 1<br />

DOROTHY MELNYK, INDIVIDUALLY AND<br />

EXECUTRIX FOR THE ESTATE OF MICHAEL<br />

A. MELNYK,<br />

NO OPPOSlTION<br />

SUMMARY JUDGMENT<br />

Plaintiffs, i MOTION AND ORDER<br />

."-<br />

-against-<br />

A. C. & S., NC., et a/.,<br />

Defendants.<br />

j<br />

WHEREFORE, defendant, Treadwell Corporation, hereby requests summary judgment in<br />

the above entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules $ 3212, dismissing plaintiffs'<br />

complaint against defendant, Treadwell Corporation, with prejudice in this action, and there<br />

being no opposition thereto,<br />

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against<br />

defendant, Treadwell Corporation, be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and<br />

without costs.<br />

Dated: New York, New York<br />

W! ,20<strong>11</strong><br />

m Z . 7 4 -<br />

Carol M. Tempesta, Esq.<br />

Attorney for Defendant<br />

Treadwell Corporation<br />

Estate of Michael A. Melnyg<br />

MCGIVNEY & kUGER, P.C.<br />

WEITZ & LUXENBERG, P.C.<br />

80 Broad Street-Suite 2300<br />

700 Broadway<br />

&;I;<br />

New<br />

2 6 20<strong>11</strong><br />

New York, New York 100<strong>04</strong><br />

York, New York 10003<br />

(212) . , 509-3456 n., (212) 558-5500<br />

- 1 - ?' ,' i; 3 K<br />

SO ORDElZED,<br />

CQC;N-~ Y CLERK'S OFFICE]<br />

1235-13909<br />

N0<strong>04</strong><strong>04</strong>78-1<br />

APR 15 2Q<strong>11</strong>


--_--_-I<br />

SUPREME COT JKT OF THE Sl’ATE OF NEW YORK<br />

COUNTY OF NEW YORK<br />

IN re.: NEW Y ~ R K COUNTY<br />

I NYCAJ,<br />

ASBESTOS LI?‘IGATION j I.A.S. Part 30<br />

i (Heitler, J.)<br />

*IWS DEUMENT<br />

REFERS TO:<br />

RAYMOND J. SCHWARTZ AND DOROTHY A. i<br />

SCHWARTZ,<br />

j lndex No.: <strong>11</strong> 787310<br />

I<br />

A. C. & S., INC., et nl.,<br />

P 1 aint i ffs, i NO OPPOSITION<br />

i SUMMARY JUDGMENT<br />

-against- j MOTION AND ORDER<br />

-<br />

Defendants.<br />

j<br />

WHEREFORE, defendant, Treadwell Corporation, hereby requests summary judgment in<br />

the above entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules 9 3212, dismissing plaintiffs’<br />

’<br />

complaint against defendant, Treadwell Corporation, with prejudice in this action, and there<br />

being no opposition thereto,<br />

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against<br />

defendant, Treadwell Corporation, be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and ’<br />

without costs.<br />

Dated: New York, New York<br />

91 I p 201 1<br />

\<br />

Carol M. Tempesta, Esq.<br />

Attorney for Defendant<br />

Treadwell Corporation<br />

MCGIWEY & KLUGER, P.C.<br />

80 Broad Street-Suite 2300<br />

New York, New York 100<strong>04</strong><br />

WEITZ & LUXENBERG, P.C.<br />

700 Broadway<br />

New York, New York 1000<br />

(212) 509-3456 (212) 558-5500<br />

I *”-”.”- 2 6 20<strong>11</strong><br />

SO ORDERED, .<br />

c -<br />

Hon. Shew KleX Heitler 1 35-1$&$4 \(ORK<br />

co&!R CLEff K‘S OFFICE‘<br />

N0<strong>04</strong><strong>04</strong>78-1


SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK<br />

COUNTY OF NEW YORK<br />

IN RE: NEW YORK COUNTY<br />

i NYCAL<br />

ASBESTOS LITIGATION<br />

i I.A.S. Part 30<br />

: (Heitler, J.)<br />

THIS DOCUMENT REFERS TO:<br />

FRIEDRICH SCHEUERMANN,<br />

Plaintiffs,<br />

! NO OPPOSITION<br />

-against-<br />

i SUMMARY JUDGMENT<br />

: MOTION AND ORDER<br />

A. C. & S., INC., el al.,<br />

Defendants. !<br />

WHEREFORE, defendant, Oakfabco, Inc., hereby requests summary judgment in the<br />

I<br />

!<br />

I<br />

above entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules $ 3212, dismissing plaintiffs’<br />

complaint against defendant, Oakfabco, Inc., with prejudice in this action, and there being no<br />

opposition thereto,<br />

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against<br />

defendant, Oakfabco, Inc., be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and without<br />

costs.<br />

Dated: New York, New York<br />

q/1 ,20<strong>11</strong><br />

-<br />

Robert Darish, Esq.<br />

Attorney for Defendant<br />

Oakfabco, Inc.<br />

Attorney for Plaintiffs<br />

Friedrich Scheuermann<br />

MCGIVNEY & KLUGER, P.C.<br />

Weitz & Luxenberg, P.C.<br />

80 Broad Street-Suite 2300<br />

700 Broadway<br />

New York, New York 100<strong>04</strong><br />

New York, New York 10003<br />

(212) 509-3456 ~1 (212) 558-5500<br />

FILED<br />

APR 2 6 20’<strong>11</strong><br />

I<br />

SO ORDERED,<br />

Hon. Sherry Klein Heitler -<br />

2571-0790AR<br />

N0038955-1


SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK<br />

COUNTY OF NEW YO'RK<br />

IN RE: NEW YORK COUNTY<br />

i NYCAL<br />

ASBESTOS LITIGATZON<br />

i I.A.S. Part 30<br />

i (Heitler, I.)<br />

THIS DOCUMENT REFERS TO:<br />

Index No.: <strong>11</strong>7873/0<br />

RAYMOND J. SCHWARTZ AND DOROTHY A. i<br />

SCHWARTZ,<br />

-against-<br />

A. C. &S., INC., etal.,<br />

Plaintiffs,<br />

Defendants.<br />

i NO OPPOSITION<br />

SUMMARY JUDGMENT<br />

i MOTION AND ORDER<br />

i<br />

WHEREFORE, defendant, Safeguard Industrial Equipment Co., hereby requests<br />

summary judgment in the above entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules 0 3212,<br />

dismissing plaintiffs' complaint against defendant, Safeguard Industrial Equipment Co., with<br />

prejudice in this action, and there being no opposition thereto,<br />

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against<br />

prejudice and without costs,<br />

N0<strong>04</strong><strong>04</strong>78-1<br />

APR 15 20<strong>11</strong>


SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK<br />

COUNTY OF NEW YORK<br />

Plaintiff(s),<br />

-against-<br />

A.C. & S., INC., et al.,<br />

Defendants.<br />

.................................................................<br />

X<br />

Index No(s).: <strong>11</strong>0564-00<br />

: NO-OPPOSITION SUMMARY<br />

JUDGMENT MOTION AND<br />

ORDER<br />

WHEREFORE, defendant CRANE CO. hereby requests summary judgment in the<br />

above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 32 12, dismissing<br />

plaintiffs complaint against defendant CRANE CO. with prejudice, and there being no<br />

opposition thereto,<br />

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against<br />

defendant CRANE CO. be, and the same are hereby, dismissed with prejudice and without costs.<br />

Dated: 3 \30\ \\<br />

Newxrk, New York<br />

WEITZ & LUXENBERG=?<br />

Attorneys for Plaintiff(s)<br />

700 Broadway<br />

New York, NY 10003<br />

(212) 558-5500<br />

SO ORDERED,<br />

FILED<br />

K&L~ATES LLP<br />

Attorneys for Defendan<br />

CRANE CO.<br />

599LexingtonAvenue APR 2 6 20<strong>11</strong><br />

New York, NY 10022<br />

NEW YORK<br />

COUNTY CLERK'S OFnGk


SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK<br />

COUNTY OF NEW YORK<br />

' NYCAL<br />

BETTY KING, Individually and as Executrix for the :<br />

. I.A.S. Part 30<br />

Estate of RONALD E. KING,<br />

(Hon. Sherry Klein Heitler)<br />

Plaint iff( s),<br />

: Index No(s).: <strong>11</strong>0960-00<br />

WHEREFORE, defendant CRANE CO. hereby requests summary judgment in the<br />

above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212, dismissing<br />

plaintiffs complaint against defendant CRANE CO. with prejudice, and there being no<br />

opposition thereto,<br />

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against<br />

defendant CRANE CO. be, and the same are hereby, dismissed with prejudice and without costs.<br />

Attorneys for Plaintiff(s)<br />

700 Broadway CRANE CO.<br />

New York, NY 10003<br />

599 Lexington Avenue<br />

(212) 558-5500<br />

New York, NY 10022<br />

SO ORDERED,<br />

Hon. Sherry Klein Heitler


THIS DOCUMENT RELATES TO:<br />

BERNARD IAMMATEO<br />

~ 9 l I W O 6<br />

ASSIGNED TO:<br />

HON. SHERRY KLEIN HEITLER<br />

NO OPPOSITION STJMMARY<br />

JUDGMENT MOTION AND<br />

ORDER<br />

WHEREFORE, defendant consolidated Edison Company of New York, Inc.<br />

hereby requests summary judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law<br />

and Rules Section 3212, dismissing plaintiffs complaint against defendant Consolidated Edison<br />

Company of New Yo& Inc. with prejudice, and there being no opposition thereto,<br />

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross-cfaims<br />

against defendant Consolidated Edison Company of New York, Inc., be and the same are hereby<br />

- - - - - - - - - -<br />

dismissed with prejudice and without costs.<br />

,"i" York<br />

Dated: ne^^^<br />

:B amin Darche, Esq.<br />

WEITZ & LUXENBERG, P.C.<br />

Attorneys for Plaintiff<br />

700 Broadway<br />

New York, NY 100035<br />

York, Inc.<br />

4 Irving Place<br />

New York, NY 10003-3598<br />

ESQ.


SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK<br />

COUNTY OF NEW YORK<br />

1N RE: NEW YORK CITY ASBESTOS LITIGATION<br />

_rl___r___-__-___-_______________r_____r-------------------------<br />

X<br />

This Document Relates To:<br />

EDWARD GUNTRIPP and KATHLEEN ANN<br />

GUNTRIPP,<br />

: NYCAL<br />

I.A.S. Part 30<br />

: (Hon. Sherry Klein Heitler)<br />

WHEREFORE, defendant CRANE CO. hereby requests summary judgment in the<br />

above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212, dismissing<br />

plaintiffs' complaint against defendant CRANE CO, with prejudice, and there being no<br />

opposition thereto,<br />

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against<br />

defendant CRANE CO. be, and the same are hereby, dismissed with prejudice and without costs,<br />

Dated: '3 \.3 o\ \\<br />

KirstedAlford Kneis, Esq.<br />

K&@ATES LLP<br />

Attorneys for Plaintiff(s)<br />

Attorneys for Defenda<br />

700 Broadway CRANE CO.<br />

New York, NY 10003<br />

599 Lexington Avenue APR 2 6 20<strong>11</strong><br />

(2 12) 558-5500<br />

New York, NY 10022<br />

(2 12) 536-3900 ~:EW YORK<br />

~QUN iy CLERK'S OFFICE<br />

I<br />

SO ORJIEREiD,<br />

Hon. Sherry Klein Heitler


SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK<br />

COUNTY OF NEW YORK<br />

* NYCAL<br />

LAURA FRACCALVIERI, as Administratrix for the :<br />

Part 3o<br />

Estate of FRANK FRACCALVIERI,<br />

(Hon, Shew Klein Heitler)<br />

Plaintiff(s),<br />

: Index No(s).: 1 12444-00<br />

A.C. & S., INC., et al.,<br />

-against-<br />

NO-OPPOSITION SUMMARY<br />

JUDGMENT MOTION AND<br />

: ORDER<br />

WHEREFORE, defendant CRANE CO. hereby requests summary judgment in the<br />

above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 32 12, dismissing<br />

plaintiff's<br />

complaint against defendant CRANE CO, with prejudice, and there being no<br />

opposition thereto,<br />

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against<br />

defendant CRANE CO. be, and the same are hereby, dismissed with prejudice and without costs.<br />

Dated: 3 \ 3d\ {\<br />

New York. New York<br />

Attorneys for Plaintiff(s)<br />

700 Broadway<br />

Attdneys for Defendant<br />

CRANE CO. APH 2 6 201'<br />

New York, NY 10003<br />

599 Lexington Avenue<br />

(212) 558-5500 New York, NY 10022 PiEw YORK<br />

(212) 536-3900 mt4N CLERKS OFFICE<br />

SO ORDERED,


SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK<br />

COUNTY OF NEW YORK<br />

PATRICK C. VANCHIERI AND MARGARET<br />

VANCHIERI,<br />

A.C. & S., INC., et al.,<br />

Plaintiff(s),<br />

"against-<br />

Defendants,<br />

NYCAL<br />

: I.A.S. Part 30<br />

(Hon. Sherry Kle-i Heitler)<br />

1 Index No. <strong>11</strong>3196-00<br />

NO-OPPOSITION SUMMARY<br />

: JUDGMENT MOTION AND<br />

ORDER<br />

WHEREFORE, defendant CRANE CO, hereby requests summary judgment in the<br />

above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 32 12, dismissing<br />

plaintiffs' complaint against defendant CRANE CO. with prejudice, and there being no<br />

opposition thereto,<br />

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against<br />

defendant CRANE CO, be, and the same are hereby, dismissed with prejudice and without costs.<br />

Dated: 3 \3 a\ (\<br />

New &rk, New York<br />

Attorneys for Plaintiff(s)<br />

700 Broadway<br />

CRANE CO.<br />

New York, NY 10003<br />

599 Lexington Avenue<br />

(212) 558-5500 New York, NY 10022<br />

SO ORDERED,<br />

Hon. Sherry Klein Heitler<br />

AFR 15 20<strong>11</strong>


WHEREFORE, defendant CRANE CO. hereby requests summary judgment in the<br />

above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212, dismissing<br />

plaintiffs' complaint against defendant CRANE CO. with prejudice, and there being no<br />

opposition thereto,<br />

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against<br />

defendant CRANE CO. be, and the same are hereby, dismissed with prejudice and without costs.<br />

Dated: 3\3 -\ \\<br />

Frank Ortiz, Esq.<br />

WEITZ & LUXENBERG, P.<br />

Attorneys for Plaintiff(s)<br />

700 Broadway<br />

New York, NY 10003<br />

(212) 558-5500<br />

%<br />

Kirst n Alford Kneis. Esa.<br />

CRANE CO.<br />

599LexingtonAvenue APR 2 6 20<strong>11</strong><br />

New York, NY 10022<br />

(2 12) 536-3900<br />

SO ORDERED,


SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK<br />

COUNTY OF NEW YORK<br />

IN RE: NEW YORK CITY ASBESTOS LITIGATION<br />

* NYCAL<br />

MARY ANN PICINIC and SANDY PICINIC as Co- :<br />

Part 3o<br />

Executrices for the Estate of RAIMONDO PICINIC, :<br />

, (Hon. Sherry Klein Heitler)<br />

A.C. & S., INC., et al.,<br />

Plaint i ff( s) ,<br />

-against-<br />

Defendants.<br />

Index No.: <strong>11</strong>3778-00<br />

: NO-OPPOSITION SUMMARY<br />

JUDGMENT MOTION AND<br />

: ORDER<br />

WHEREFORE, defendant CRANE CO. hereby requests summary judgment in the<br />

above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212, dismissing<br />

plaintiffs' complaint against defendant CRANE CO. with prejudice, and there being no<br />

opposition thereto,<br />

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against<br />

defendant CRANE CO. be, and the same are hereby, dismissed with prejudice and without costs.<br />

Dated: 3 \ 3 o \ \ \,<br />

Frank Ortiz, Esq.<br />

fiLED<br />

Attorneys for Plaintiff(s)<br />

700 Broadway CRANE CO.<br />

New York, NY 10003<br />

(212) 558-5500<br />

599 Lexington Avenue<br />

NewYork,NY 10022 APR 2 6 20<strong>11</strong><br />

SO ORDERED, ~9~~<br />

r?ii:\)V YORK<br />

1 y CLERK'S OFFICE<br />

APR 1.5 20<strong>11</strong>


SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK<br />

ALL COUNTIES WITHIN NEW YORK CITY<br />

___l_l____------l--l------------------<br />

X NYCAL<br />

IN RE: NEW YORK COUNTY I.A.S. Part 30<br />

ASBESTOS LITIGATION<br />

(Judge Heitler<br />

-______-_--_-______-------------------<br />

X<br />

This Document Relates to:<br />

Index No.: <strong>11</strong>4257/00<br />

MICHAEL ZOGBY<br />

NO-OPPOSITION<br />

SUMMARY JUDGMENT<br />

Plaintiff,<br />

MOTION AND ORDER<br />

- against -<br />

A.C. & S., INC., et al.,<br />

WHEREFORE, defendant BURNHAM LLC, hereby requests summa<br />

judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice L<br />

and Rules Section §3212, dismissing plaintiffs' Complaint again<br />

defendant BURNHAM LLC, with prejudice,<br />

and there being<br />

opposition thereto,<br />

ORDERED,<br />

that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims a<br />

cross claims against defendant BURNHAM LLC,<br />

be dismissed wi<br />

prejudice and without costs.<br />

T<br />

Frank Ortiz, Esq.<br />

Weitz & Luxenberg, P.C.<br />

Attorneys for Plaintiff<br />

Michael Zogby<br />

700 Broadway, 6'h Floor<br />

New York, New York 10003<br />

212-558-5500<br />

Cullen and-Dykman- LLP<br />

Attorneys for Defendant<br />

Burn ham L LC<br />

177 Montague Stree<br />

Brooklyn, New York<br />

(718) 855-9000<br />

Our File No. : <strong>11</strong>084&j3W8<strong>26</strong> 20<strong>11</strong><br />

NEW YORK<br />

COUNTY CLERK'S OFFIC<br />

APR 15 20<strong>11</strong>


SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK<br />

ALL COUNTIES WITHIN NEW YORK CITY<br />

________________-_-_____II____________<br />

X<br />

IN RE: NEW YORK COUNTY<br />

ASBESTOS LITIGATION<br />

.....................................<br />

This Document Relates to:<br />

Toni Zogby, Individually and as<br />

Administratrix for the Estate of<br />

Michael Zogby,<br />

Plaintiff,<br />

- against -<br />

A.C. & S.,<br />

Inc., et al.,<br />

-X<br />

NY CAL<br />

I.A.S. Part 30<br />

(Judge Heitler)<br />

Index No.: <strong>11</strong>4257/00<br />

NO OPPOSITION<br />

SUMMARY JUDGMENT<br />

MOTION AND ORDER<br />

Defendants.<br />

..................................... -X<br />

WHEREFORE, defendant Mario & DiBono Plastering Co. Inc.,<br />

hereby requests summary judgment in the above-entitled case,<br />

pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 83212,<br />

dismissing plaintiffs' Complaint against defendant Mario t<br />

DiBono Plastering Co. Inc., with prejudice, and there being nc<br />

opposition thereto,<br />

ORDERED,<br />

that upon notice to all co-defendants, a<strong>11</strong> claim:<br />

and cross claims against defendant Mario & DiBono Plastering Co,<br />

Inc., be dismissed with prejudice and without costs<br />

Dated: Brooklyn, New York<br />

D<br />

Weitz & Luxenberg, P.C.<br />

Attorneys for Plaintiff<br />

Toni Zogby, Individually and as Mario & DiBono Plastering Co.<br />

Administratrix fox the Estate Inc.<br />

of Michael Zogby<br />

177 Montague Street<br />

700 Broadway, 6th Floor Brooklyn, New York <strong>11</strong>201<br />

New York, New York 10003 (718) 855-9000<br />

Our File No.: 10924-6461<br />

So Ordered:<br />

Hon. Sher'ry K. Heitler


TMc:CC(jpk)<br />

4/29/09 SUPREME COURT : ALL COUNTIES<br />

WITJ3lN THE CITY OF NEW YORK<br />

M RE NEW YORK CITY ASBESTOS LITIGATION,<br />

THIS DOCUMENT RELATES TO:<br />

WILLIAM ANTON STOCKHAUSEN<br />

INDEX NO.<br />

<strong>11</strong>4791/00<br />

ASSIGNED TO:<br />

HON. SHERRY KLEIN HEITLER<br />

NO OPPOSITION SUMMARY<br />

JUDGMENT MOTION AND<br />

ORDER<br />

I<br />

WHEREFORE, defendant Consolidated Edisan Company of New York, Inc.<br />

hereby requests summary judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law<br />

and Rules Section 321 2, dismissing plainties complaint against defendant Consolidated Edison<br />

Company of New York, hc. with prejudice, and there being no opposition thereto,<br />

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defcendmts, dl claims and cross-claims<br />

against defendant Consolidated Edism Company of New York, h., be and -. the same are hereby<br />

- . I--- - -<br />

dismissed with prejudice and without costs.<br />

Dated: N ~w yo,rk, New York<br />

WEITZ & LUXEmERG, P.C<br />

Attorneys for Plaintiff<br />

180 M~den Lane<br />

New York, NY 10038-4925<br />

C. &:<br />

4 Irving Place<br />

New York, N Y$oQ~-#PE D<br />

SO ORJIERED: APR 2 6 20<strong>11</strong><br />

)UT File No<br />

NEV\J YWK<br />

8-7732-00 CoCj~n<br />

APR 1 'fs "rt<br />

.' EWK'S OFFICE'


~~ COUNTY<br />

I<br />

SUPREME COURT OF TliE SThTBQF NEW YORK<br />

OF NEW YORK -<br />

IN RE: NEW YOKK COUNTY‘<br />

ASBESTOS LITIGATION<br />

.<br />

THIS DCICUMENT REFERS TO:<br />

MARY ROMANO, INDIVJBUALLY AND AS<br />

EXECUTRIX FOR TIHE ESTATE OF GIN0<br />

ROMANO,<br />

-against-<br />

i NYCAL<br />

1 I.A.S. Part 30<br />

i (Heitler, J.)<br />

j<br />

i<br />

a<br />

Index No.: 15836/00 08386/00<br />

[ NO OPPOSITION<br />

! SUMMARY JUDGMENT<br />

Plaintiffs, i MOTION AND OmER<br />

A. C. & S., INC., et ul.,<br />

Defendants. i<br />

WHEREFORE, defendant, Treadwell Corporation, hereby requests summary judgment in<br />

I<br />

the above entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules 0 3212, dismissing plaintiffs’<br />

complaint against defendant, Treadwell Corporation, with prejudice in this action, and there<br />

being no opposition thereto,<br />

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against<br />

defendant, Treadwell Corporation, be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and<br />

without costs.<br />

Dated: New York, New York<br />

Carol M. Tempesta, Esq.<br />

Attorney for Defendant<br />

Treadwell Corporation<br />

MCGlVNEY & UUGER, P.C.<br />

80 Broad Street-Suite 2300<br />

New York, New York I00<strong>04</strong><br />

(212) 509-3454<br />

5<br />

Estate of Gino Romano<br />

WEIT2 & LUXENBERG, P.<br />

700 Broadway<br />

New York, New York 10003 APR 2 6 2012<br />

SO ORDERED,<br />

Hon. Shew Klein Heitler<br />

cnM3Y5’ss;<br />

b;Ev,/ ‘(CIRK<br />

L c R OFFICE’ ~ ~<br />

N0<strong>04</strong><strong>04</strong>78-1<br />

*’ ><br />

I! 2 5 ~~~~


SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK<br />

COUNTY OF NEW YORK<br />

1N RE: NEW YORK COUNTY<br />

ASBESTOS LITIGATION<br />

THIS DOCUMENT REFERS TO:<br />

MARY ROMANO, INDIVIDUALLY AND AS<br />

EXECUTRlX FOR THE ESTATE OF GIN0<br />

ROMANO,<br />

Plaintiffs,<br />

! NYCAL<br />

i X.A.S. Part 30<br />

(HeitIer, J.)<br />

a<br />

j Index No. 15836/0 108386/00<br />

!<br />

NO OPPOSITION<br />

i SUMMARY JUDGMENT<br />

i MOTION AND ORDER<br />

... I<br />

-against-<br />

A. C. & S., INC., et al.,<br />

Defendants. 1<br />

WHEREFORE, defendant, Safeguard Industrial Equipment Co., hereby requests<br />

summary judgment in the above entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules fi 3212,<br />

dismissing plaintiffs' complaint against defendant, Safeguard Industrial Equipment Co., with<br />

prejudice in this action, and there being no opposition thereto,<br />

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against<br />

defendant, Safeguard Industrial Equipment Co., be and the same are hereby dismissed with<br />

prejudice and without costs.<br />

Attorney fddfendant<br />

Attorney for Plaintiffs<br />

Safeguard Industrial Equipment CO.<br />

MCGIVNEY & KLUGER, P.C.<br />

Estate of Gino Romano<br />

WEITZ & LUXENBERG, P.C.<br />

80 Broad Street-Suite 2300<br />

700 Broadway<br />

New York, New York 100<strong>04</strong><br />

New York, New York 10003 2 6 20<strong>11</strong><br />

(212) 509-3456<br />

(212) 558-5500<br />

NEW YOFiK<br />

SO ORDERED,<br />

couNm CLERK'S OF/=jc€<br />

Hon. Sh& Klein Heitler 324-5095C


I-<br />

SUPREME COURT OF THE STA1’E OF NEW YORK<br />

-- COUNTY OF NEW YOKK - -. ..-<br />

IN RE: NEW YORK COUNTY<br />

! NYCAL<br />

A 5 BESTOS IdITIGATI ON<br />

i I.A.S. Part 30<br />

----<br />

i (Heitler, J.)<br />

‘THIS DOCUMENT REFERS TO:<br />

Index No.: 1 1 S972/0O<br />

ANTOINETTE MARK0 KOELLER, A<br />

PERSONAL REPERESENTATIVE FOR THE<br />

ESTATE OF MAGDALENA MARY<br />

NO OPPOSITION<br />

AGRJCOLA,<br />

SUMMARY JUDGMENT<br />

MOTION AND ORDER<br />

Plaintiffs,<br />

-against-<br />

A. C. & S., TNC., et ul.,<br />

--<br />

Defendants.<br />

WHEREFORE, defendant, Courter & Company, Inc., hereby requests summary<br />

judgment in the above entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules $ 3212, dismissing<br />

plaintiffs’ complaint against defendant, Courter & Company, Inc., with prejudice in this action,<br />

and there being no opposition thereto,<br />

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against<br />

defendant, Courter & Company, Inc., be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and<br />

without costs.<br />

Michele J. Mittleman, Esq.<br />

Attorney for Defendant<br />

Courter & Company, Inc.<br />

McGIWY & UUGER, P.C.<br />

80 Broad Street-Suite 2300<br />

New York, New York 100<strong>04</strong><br />

(212) 509-3456<br />

SO ORDERED,<br />

Estate of Magdalena M<br />

WElTZ & LUXENBERG, P.C.<br />

<strong>11</strong>22-19539<br />

N0<strong>04</strong><strong>04</strong>78-1<br />

APR 15 20<strong>11</strong>1


SUPREME COURT OF IHE STAlE OF NEW YORK<br />

COUNTY OF NEW YORK<br />

IN RE: NEW YORK COUNTY j NYCAL<br />

ASBESTOS LITIGATION<br />

1 I.A.S. Part 30<br />

(Hei tler, J .><br />

THIS DOCUMENT REFERS TO:<br />

ANTOINETTE MARK0 KOELLER, A<br />

PERSONAL REPERESENTATIVE FOR THE<br />

ESTATE OF MAGDALENA MARY<br />

AGRICOLA,<br />

-against-<br />

A. C. & S., INC., et al.,<br />

Plaintiffs,<br />

Defendants.<br />

Index No.: 1 15972/00<br />

NO OPPOSITION<br />

SUMMARY JUDGMENT<br />

MOTION AND ORDER<br />

WHEREFORE, defendant, Treadwell Corporation, hereby requests summary judgment in<br />

the above entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules 8 3212, dismissing plaintiffs'<br />

complaint against defendant, Treadwell Corporation, with prejudice in this action, and there<br />

being no opposition thereto,<br />

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against<br />

defendant, Treadwell Corporation, be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and<br />

without costs.<br />

Carol M. Ternpesta, Esq.<br />

Attorney for Defendant<br />

Treadwell Corporation<br />

MCG~VNEY & KLUGER, P.C.<br />

80 Broad Street-Suite 2300<br />

New York. New York 100<strong>04</strong><br />

(212) 509-3456<br />

SO ORDERED,<br />

Attorney for Plaintiff;<br />

Estate of Magdalena Mary A&d$al<br />

WEITZ & LUXENBERG, P.C. '<br />

700 Broadway<br />

York, New York 10003 ,A 1<br />

q-5 58-5500<br />

Hon. Sherry Klein Heitler 1235-19012<br />

PIT' ,'2r<br />

Grwyw d,<br />

2 6 2QI1<br />

VORK<br />

'cL6RKs,€FFEE;<br />

N0<strong>04</strong><strong>04</strong>78-1


SIJPREME couw OF THE vs"ffl*rF; OF NEW YORK<br />

COUNTY OF NEW YORK<br />

--_I_."<br />

THIS DOCUMENT REFERS TO:<br />

ANTOINETTE MARK0 KOELLER, A<br />

PERSONAL REPERESENTATIVE FOR THE<br />

ESTATE OF MAGDALENA MARY<br />

AGRICOLA,<br />

-against-<br />

A. C. & S., XNC., et al.,<br />

Plaintiffs,<br />

Defendants.<br />

NYCAL<br />

I.A.S. Part 30<br />

(Heitler, J.)<br />

Index No.: 1 15972/00<br />

NO OPPOSITION<br />

SUMMARY JUDGMENT<br />

MOTION AND ORDER<br />

WHEREFOEE, defendant, Tishman Liquidating Corp., hereby requests summary<br />

judgment in the above entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules 5 3212, dismissing<br />

plaintiffs' complaint against defendant, 'Tishman Liquidating Corp., with prejudice in this action,<br />

and there being no opposition thereto,<br />

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against<br />

defendant, Tishman Liquidating Cop, be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and<br />

without costs.<br />

MCGIVNEY & KLUGER, P.C.<br />

80 Broad Street-Suite 2300<br />

New York, New York 100<strong>04</strong><br />

(212) 509-3456<br />

Estate of Magdalena Mary Agricola<br />

WElTZ & LUXENBERG, P.C.<br />

700 Broadway<br />

New York, New York 10003<br />

SO ORDERED,<br />

Hon. Sherry Kleih Heitler 2383-2960


SUPREME COURT OF THE STAlE OF NEW YORK<br />

- COUNTY OF .I__- NEW YORK<br />

IN N3: NEW YORK COUNI'Y-'='-<br />

! NYCAL<br />

ASBESTOS LI'IIGATION<br />

! I.A.S. Part 30<br />

-I-.-I<br />

! (Heitler, J,)<br />

THIS DOCUMENT REFERS TO:<br />

.--I<br />

j Index No.: <strong>11</strong>6672/00<br />

!<br />

i<br />

CAROL D'AMORE, INDIVIDUALLY AND AS<br />

EXECUTRIX FOR THE ESTATE OF GERALD<br />

J. D'AMORE, i NO OPPOSITION<br />

! SUMMARY JUDGMENT<br />

Plaintiffs, ! MOTION AND ORDER<br />

-against-<br />

A. C. & S., INC., et al.,<br />

Defendants.<br />

i<br />

WHEREFORE, defendant, Courter & Company, Inc., hereby requests summary<br />

judgment in the above entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules $ 3212, dismissing<br />

plaintiffs' complaint against defendant, Courter & Company, Inc., with prejudice in this action,<br />

and there being no opposition thereto,<br />

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against<br />

defendant, Courter & Company, Inc., be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and<br />

without costs.<br />

Dated: New Yo&, New York<br />

Michele J. Mittlehan, Esq.<br />

Attorney for Defendant<br />

Courter & Company, Inc.<br />

MCGIVNEY & KLUGER, P.C.<br />

80 Broad Street-Suite 2300<br />

New York, New York 100<strong>04</strong><br />

(212) 509-3456<br />

SO ORDERED,<br />

700 Broadway<br />

, New York 10003<br />

@ 2 6 m'<br />

N0<strong>04</strong><strong>04</strong>78-1<br />

APR 15 20<strong>11</strong>


SIJPREME couw OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK<br />

COUNTY OF NEW YORK<br />

IN RE: NEW YORK COUNTY<br />

NY CAI,<br />

ASBESTOS 1,ITIGATION<br />

1.A.S. Part 30<br />

(Heitler, J.)<br />

THIS DOCUMENT REFERS TO:<br />

CAROL D’AMORE, INDIVIDUALLY AND AS<br />

EXECUTRIX FOR THE ESTATE OF GERALD<br />

J. D’AMORE,<br />

-against-<br />

A. C. & S., INC., et ul.,<br />

Plaintiffs,<br />

Defendants.<br />

Index No.: 1 16672/00<br />

NO OPPOSITION<br />

SUMMARY JUDGMENT<br />

MOTION AND OmER<br />

WHEREFORE, defendant, Treadwell Corporation, hereby requests summary judgment in<br />

the above entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Q 3212, dismissing plaintiffs’<br />

complaint against defendant, Treadwell Corporation, with prejudice in this action, and there<br />

being no opposition thereto,<br />

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against<br />

defendant, Treadwell Corporation, be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and<br />

without costs.<br />

Dated: New Y rk, New York<br />

,20<strong>11</strong><br />

Carol M. Tempesta, Esq.<br />

Attorney for Defendant<br />

Treadwell Corporation<br />

MCG~VNEY & KLUGER, P.C.<br />

80 Broad Street-Suite 2300<br />

New York, New York 100<strong>04</strong><br />

(2 12) 509-3456<br />

SO ORDERED,<br />

Estate if Gerald J. D’Amore<br />

FILE<br />

WElTZ & LUXENBERG, P.C. D<br />

700 Broadway<br />

NewYork,NewYork 10003 APR 2 6 20<strong>11</strong><br />

k”W YORK<br />

COUNTY CLERK‘S OFFJ~<br />

1235-2462<br />

N0<strong>04</strong><strong>04</strong>78-1<br />

APR 152018,


--_I-<br />

SUPREME COURl' OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK : I<br />

COUNTY OF NEW YORK<br />

IN RE: NEW YORK COUN'I'Y<br />

f NYCAL<br />

ASBESTOS I,TTIGA?'ION i I.A.S. Part 30<br />

i (Heitler, J.)<br />

---1<br />

THIS DOCUMENT REFERS TO:<br />

CAROL D'AMORE, INDIVIDUALLY AND AS<br />

EXECUTRIX FOR THE ESTATE OF GERALD<br />

i Index No.: I 16672/00<br />

!<br />

1<br />

J. D'AMORE, i NO OPPOSITION I<br />

-against-<br />

Plaintiffs,<br />

j<br />

SUMMARY JUDGMENT<br />

MOTION AND 0IU)ER<br />

A. C. & S., INC., et al., I<br />

Defendants.<br />

WHEREFORE, defendant, Tishman Liquidating Corp., hereby requests summary<br />

judgment in the above entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules § 3212, dismissing<br />

plaintiffs' complaint against defendant, Tishman Liquidating Corp., with prejudice in this action,<br />

and there being no opposition thereto,<br />

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against<br />

defendant, Tishman Liquidating Corp., be and the same are hereby dismissed wi<br />

without costs.<br />

Dated: New Ymk. New York<br />

ApR 2 6 20''<br />

I<br />

MCGIVNEY & KLUG~R, P:C.<br />

WEITZ & LUXENBERG, P.C.<br />

700 Broadwav<br />

80 Broad Street-Suite 2300<br />

New York, New York 100<strong>04</strong> New York, N;'ew York 10003<br />

(212) 509-3456<br />

SO ORDERED,<br />

2383-2970<br />

N0<strong>04</strong><strong>04</strong>78-I


~ DJ<br />

_I<br />

SUPREME COIJK’T OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK<br />

----~<br />

COUNTY OF NEW YON --<br />

RE: NEW YORK COUNTY<br />

i NYCAI,<br />

ASBESTOS LITIGATION<br />

j I.A.S. Part 30<br />

i (Heitler, J.)<br />

‘THIS DOCUMENT REFERS TO:<br />

i Index No.: <strong>11</strong>6927/00<br />

WILLIAM J. DONNELLY AND MARIE<br />

DONNELLY,<br />

/ NO OPPOSITION<br />

P1 ain ti ffs, ! SUMMARY JUDGMENT<br />

j MOTION AND ORDER<br />

-against-<br />

A. C. & S., INC., et al.,<br />

-- Defendants. i<br />

WHEREFORE, defendant, Treadwell Corporation, hereby requests summary ddgrnent in<br />

the above entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules 9 3212, dismissing plaintiffs’<br />

complaint against defendant, Treadwell Corporation, with prejudice in this action, and there<br />

being no opposition thereto,<br />

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against<br />

defendant, Treadwell Corporation, be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and<br />

without costs.<br />

-La<br />

Carol M. Tempesta, Esq.<br />

Attorney for Defendant<br />

Treadwell Corporation<br />

MCGIVNEY & KLUGER, P.C.<br />

80 Broad Street-Suite 2300<br />

New York, New York 100<strong>04</strong><br />

(212) 509-3456<br />

William J. Donnelly and Marie Donnelly<br />

WElTZ & LUXENBERG, P.C.


----I--- -_-.---<br />

STJPREME COlJKT OF THE STATE OF NEW YOKK<br />

COUN'I'Y OF NEW YOKK<br />

-I_.<br />

IN RE: NEW YORK COUNTY<br />

.-<br />

i NYCAL<br />

ASBESTOS LI'T'IGATION<br />

j I.A.S. Part 30<br />

WILLIAM J. DONNELLY AND MARIE<br />

DONNELLY,<br />

against-<br />

Plaintiffs,<br />

i Index No.: <strong>11</strong>6927/00<br />

i NO OPPOSITION<br />

SUMMARY JUDGMENT<br />

! MOTION AND ORDER<br />

A. C. & S., NC., et al.,<br />

Defendants.<br />

j<br />

WHEREFORE, defendant, Courter & Company, Inc., hereby requests summary<br />

judgment in the above entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Q 3212, dismissing<br />

plaintiffs' complaint against defendant, Courter & Company, Inc., with prejudice in this action,<br />

and there being no opposition thereto,<br />

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against<br />

defendant, Courter & Company, 'Inc., be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and<br />

without costs.<br />

Dated: New Yprk, New York<br />

Michele J. Mittlegan, Esq.<br />

Attorney for Defendant<br />

Courter & Company, Tnc.<br />

MCGIVNEY & KLUGER, P.C.<br />

80 Broad Street-Suite 2300<br />

New York, New York 100<strong>04</strong><br />

(212) 509-3456<br />

SO ORDERED,<br />

William J. Donnelly and Marie Donnelr'y<br />

WEITZ & LUXENBERG. P.C.<br />

700 Broadway<br />

New York, New York 10003<br />

<strong>11</strong> 22-<br />

apff 2 6 m'<br />

N0<strong>04</strong><strong>04</strong>78-1<br />

APR 15 20<strong>11</strong>


SUPREME COURI’ OF THE STATE OF NEW YOKK<br />

COUNTY OF NEW YORK<br />

-I__-<br />

IN RE: NEW YORK COUNTY<br />

: NYCAL<br />

ASBESTOS LITIGATION j X.A.S. Part 30<br />

; (Hcitler, J.)<br />

THIS DOCUMENT REFERS TO:<br />

Index No.: <strong>11</strong>7700/00<br />

EDWARD GOlCHMAN AND PHYLLIS<br />

GOICHM AN,<br />

NO OPPOSlTION<br />

Plaintiffs, SUMMARY JUDGMENT<br />

MOTION AND ORDER<br />

-against-<br />

A. C. & S., INC., et al.,<br />

Defendants.<br />

i<br />

WHEREFORE7 defendant, Treadwell Corporation, hereby requests summary ju,grnent in<br />

the above entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules $ 3212, dismissing plaintiffs’<br />

complaint against defendant, Treadwell Corporation, with prejudice in this action, and there<br />

being no opposition thereto,<br />

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against<br />

defendant, Treadwell Corporation, be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and<br />

without costs.<br />

Dated: New york, New York<br />

u<br />

20<strong>11</strong><br />

5Q2,w> 3<br />

Carol M. Tempesta, gsq.<br />

Attorney for Defendant<br />

Treadwell Corporation<br />

M c G ~ & Y KLUGER, P.C.<br />

80 Broad Street-Suite 2300<br />

New York, New York 100<strong>04</strong><br />

Edward Goichman and Phyllis Goichrnak ’<br />

WEITZ & LUXENBERG, P.C.<br />

700 Broadway<br />

New York, New York 10003<br />

.1<br />

D<br />

N0<strong>04</strong><strong>04</strong>78-1 APR 5 20<strong>11</strong>4


SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK<br />

.I_-.- COUNTY - OF NEW YON -<br />

IN KE: NEW YORK COUNTY j NYCAL<br />

AS BE S'PO S L 1 TI G A 'r 1 ON<br />

j I.A.S. Part 30<br />

i (Heitler, J.)<br />

THIS IIOCUMENII' REFERS TO:<br />

i Index No.: <strong>11</strong>7846/00<br />

CHARLES NEWMAN AND SHIRLEY<br />

NEWMAN,<br />

-against-<br />

A+ C. & S., INC., et al.,<br />

i NO OPPOSITION<br />

Plaintiffs, j SUMMARY JUDGMENT<br />

; MOTION AND ORDER<br />

-<br />

Defendants.<br />

i<br />

WHEREFORE, defendant, Treadwell Corporation, hereby requests summary judgment in<br />

the above entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules 5 3212, dismissing plaintiffs'<br />

complaint against defendant, Treadwell Corporation, with prejudice in this action, and there<br />

being no opposition thereto,<br />

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against<br />

defendant, Treadwell Corporation, be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and<br />

without costs.<br />

Treadwell Corporation<br />

MCGI~Y & UUGER, P.C.<br />

80 Broad Street-Suite 2300<br />

New York, New Y ork 100<strong>04</strong><br />

(212) 509-3456<br />

SO ORDERED,<br />

Charles Newman and Shirley Newman<br />

WEITZ & LUXENBERG, P.C.<br />

123 1<br />

C&%"Y<br />

FILED<br />

.APR 2 6 20<strong>11</strong><br />

PEW YORM<br />

CLERKS OFFICE'


SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK<br />

COUNTY OF NEW YORK<br />

IN RE: NEW YORK COUNTY<br />

NYCAL<br />

ASBESTOS LITIGATION<br />

I.A.S. Part 30<br />

(Heitler, J.)<br />

THIS DOCUMENT REFERS TO:<br />

Index No.: <strong>11</strong>0<br />

FRIEDRICH SCHEUERMANN,<br />

-against-<br />

A. C. & S., INC., et al.,<br />

Plaintiffs,<br />

Defendants.<br />

NO OPPOSITION<br />

SUMMARY JUDGMENT<br />

MOTION AND ORDER<br />

WHEREFORE, defendant, Oakfabco, Inc,, hereby requests summary judgment in the<br />

above entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules 8 3212, dismissing plaintiffs’<br />

complaint against defendant, Oakfabco, Inc., with prejudice in this action, and there being no<br />

opposition thereto,<br />

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against<br />

defendant, Oakfabco, Inc., be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and without<br />

costs.<br />

Dated: New York, New York<br />

y//7 ,20<strong>11</strong><br />

J<br />

Robert Darish, Esq.<br />

Attorney for Defendant<br />

Oakfabco, Inc.<br />

MCGIVNEY & KLUGER, P.C.<br />

80 Broad Street-Suite 2300<br />

New York, New York 100<strong>04</strong><br />

(212) 509-3456<br />

Ea.<br />

dwk3 M.<br />

F%.<br />

Attorney for Plaintiffs<br />

Friedrich Scheuermann<br />

Weitz & Luxenberg, P.C.<br />

700 Broadway<br />

ew York 10003<br />

B<br />

APR 2 6 Zo1’<br />

D<br />

I<br />

SO ORDERED,<br />

Hon. Sherry Klein Heitler<br />

2571-0790AR<br />

YORK<br />

CC7UN~y CLERKS oFFie’<br />

N0038955-1


~<br />

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK<br />

COUNTY OF NEW YORK<br />

IN RE: NEW YORK COUNTY<br />

NYCAL<br />

ASBESTOS LITIGATION<br />

I.A.S. Part 30<br />

(Heitler, J.)<br />

THIS DOCUMENT REFERS TO:<br />

RAYMOND J. SCHWARTZ AND DOROTHY A.<br />

SCHWARTZ,<br />

Index N o.~7~~<strong>11</strong>0182/00<br />

-against-<br />

A. C, & S., INC., et al.,<br />

Plaintiffs,<br />

Defendants. !<br />

NO OPPOSITION<br />

SUMMARY JUDGMENT<br />

MOTION AND ORDER<br />

WHEREFORE, defendant, Safeguard Industrial Equipment Co., hereby requests<br />

summary judgment in the above entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules 6 3212,<br />

dismissing plaintiffs’ complaint against defendant, Safeguard Industrial Equipment Co., with<br />

prejudice in this action, and there being no opposition thereto,<br />

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against<br />

defendant, Safeguard Industrial Equipment Co., be and the same are hereby dismissed with<br />

prejudice and without costs.<br />

1<br />

I<br />

New York<br />

-<br />

20<strong>11</strong><br />

--...<br />

Matth4w I). Sampar, Esq.<br />

Attome-r Defendant<br />

Safeguard Industrial Equipment Co.<br />

MCGIWEY & KLUGER, P.C.<br />

80 Broad Street-Suite 2300<br />

New York, New York 100<strong>04</strong><br />

(212) 509-3456 (7 7 / i<br />

A:<br />

SO ORDERED,<br />

Raymond J. Schwartz and Dorothy A. Schwartz<br />

WEITZ & LUXENBERG, P.C.<br />

700 Broadway<br />

New York, New York 10003<br />

(212) 558-5500<br />

APR 15 20<strong>11</strong>


SUPREME COIJKT OF THE STATE OF NEW YOKK<br />

COUNTY OF NEW YORK -~<br />

IN RE: NEW YORK COUNTY<br />

I NYCAL<br />

ASBESTOS LI1'IGATION<br />

i I.A.S. Part 30<br />

i (Heitler, J,)<br />

THIS DOCUMENT REFERS TO:<br />

RAYMONJI J. SCHWARTZ AND DOROTHY A.<br />

SCHWARTZ,<br />

A. C. & S., INC., et al.,<br />

-I<br />

Plaintiffs, ! NO OPPOSITION<br />

j SUMMARY JUDGMENT<br />

-against- i MOTION AND ORDER<br />

Defendants.<br />

j<br />

WHEREFORE, defendant, Treadwell Corporation, hereby requests summary judgment in<br />

the above entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Q 3212, dismissing plaintiffs'<br />

complaint against defendant, Treadwell Corporation, with prejudice in this action, and there<br />

being no opposition thereto,<br />

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against<br />

defendant, Treadwell Corporation, be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and<br />

without costs.<br />

Carol M. Tempesta, Esq. '<br />

Attorney for Defendant<br />

Treadwell Corporation<br />

MCGIVNEY & KLUGER, P.C.<br />

80 Broad Street-Suite 2300<br />

New York, New York 100<strong>04</strong><br />

(212) 509-3456<br />

SO ORDERED,<br />

f<br />

Hon. Sherry K ld Heitler<br />

700 Broadway<br />

(212) 558-5500<br />

2 6 20<strong>11</strong><br />

1 5-1hmW YORK<br />

c o k CLERK'S OFFICE'<br />

N0<strong>04</strong><strong>04</strong>78-1


SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK<br />

COUNTY OF NEW YOKK<br />

IN m: NEW YORK cowry<br />

. ~ - -<br />

! NYCAL<br />

ASBESTOS LITIGATION<br />

THIS DOCUMENT REFERS TO:<br />

i I.A.S. Part 30<br />

i (Heitler, J.)<br />

DOROTHY MELNYK, INDIVIDUALLY AND<br />

EXECUTRIX FOR 1'HE ESTATE OF MICHAEL j<br />

A. MELNYK, / NO OPPOSITION<br />

I SUMMARY .JUDGMENT<br />

Plaintiffs, i MOTION AND ORDER<br />

-against-<br />

Defendants.<br />

WHEREFORE, defendant, Treadwell Corporation, hereby requests summary judgment in<br />

the above entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules 5 3212, dismissing plaintiffs'<br />

complaint against defendant, Treadwell Corporation, with prejudice in this action, and there<br />

being no opposition thereto,<br />

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against<br />

defendant, Treadwell Corporation, be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and<br />

without costs.<br />

Dated: New York, New York<br />

ql! ,20<strong>11</strong><br />

A<br />

Carol M. Tempesta, Esq.<br />

Attorney for Defendant<br />

Treadwell Corporation<br />

MCGIVNEY & UUGER, P.C.<br />

80 Broad Street-Suite 2300<br />

New York, New York 100<strong>04</strong><br />

(212) 509-3456<br />

SO ORDERED,<br />

WEITZ & LUXENBERG, P.C.<br />

700 Broadway<br />

New York, New York 10003 APZ 2 6 20<strong>11</strong><br />

pc 1 L' (,$! y 9RK<br />

COUNTY CLERKS OFFICE]<br />

123513909<br />

N0<strong>04</strong><strong>04</strong>78-1


SlJPKEME COURT OF TEE STATE OF NEW YOKK<br />

mumy OF NEW yorx<br />

IN RE: NEW YORK COUNTY i NYCAL<br />

ASBESTOS LlTlGATlON<br />

j I.A.S. Part 30<br />

- i (Heitler, J.)<br />

THIS DOCUMENTREFERS TO:<br />

j Index No.: <strong>11</strong>8460/00<br />

SHARON B. HARVEY, INDIVJDIJALLY AND<br />

ADMWISTRATRIX FOR 'WE ESTATE OF<br />

RICHARD L. HARVEY,<br />

-against-<br />

PI aintiffs,<br />

i NO OPPOSITION<br />

j SUMMARY JUDGMENT<br />

i MOTION AND ORDER<br />

I<br />

A. C. & S., INC., et a].,<br />

Defendants. !<br />

WHEREFOFE, defendant, Patterson Pump Co., hereby requests summary judgment in<br />

the above entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules 5 3212, dismissing plaintiffs'<br />

complaint against defendant, Patterson Pump Co., with prejudice in this action, and there being<br />

no opposition thereto,<br />

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against<br />

defendant, Patterson Pump Co., be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and without<br />

costs.<br />

Dated: New Yor.k,,New York<br />

-<br />

Attorney fo7Defendant<br />

Patterson Pump Co.<br />

MCGIVNEY & KLUGER, P.C.<br />

SO Broad Street-Suite 2300<br />

New Yoxk, New York 100<strong>04</strong><br />

(212) 509-3456<br />

SO ORDERED,<br />

Estate of Richard L.<br />

WE~TZ & LUXENBERG, P.C.<br />

700 Broadway<br />

New York, New York I 0003<br />

APR 2 6 Zo1'<br />

D<br />

pq""-'s\J YORK<br />

Ty CERKS OFF^<br />

N0<strong>04</strong><strong>04</strong>78-1


SUPKEME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK<br />

-.-_-COUNTY OF NEW YORK --_--<br />

IN RE: NEW YOKK COUNTY<br />

NYCAL<br />

ASBESTOS LITIGATlON<br />

I.A.S. Part 30<br />

.-<br />

(Heitler, J .)<br />

THIS DOCUMENT REFERS TO:<br />

SHARON B. HARVEY, INDIVIDUALLY AND<br />

AS ADMINISTRATRIX FOR THE ESTATE OF<br />

RICHARD L. HARVEY,<br />

-against-<br />

A. C. & S., INC., et al.,<br />

Plaintiffs,<br />

Defendants.<br />

Index No.: 1 18460/00<br />

NO OPPOSITION<br />

SUMMARY JUDGMENT<br />

MOTION AND OFtDER<br />

WHEREFORE, defendant, Tishrnan Liquidating Corp., hereby requests summary<br />

judgment in the above entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules 9 3212, dismissing<br />

plaintiffs’ complaint against defendant, Tishman Liquidating Corp., with prejudice in this action,<br />

and there being no opposition thereto,<br />

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against<br />

defendant, Tishman Liquidating Corp., be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and<br />

without costs.<br />

Dated: New Yoyk, New York<br />

Abrney for D f ndant<br />

Tishman Liquiuing Corp.<br />

MCG~VNEY & UUGER, P.C.<br />

80 Broad Street-Suite 2300<br />

New Y ork, New Y ork 100<strong>04</strong><br />

(212) 509-3456<br />

SO ORDE<br />

WEITZ & LUXENBERG, P.C.<br />

700 Broadway<br />

New Y ork, New York 10003<br />

2383-4059<br />

FFICE’<br />

N0<strong>04</strong><strong>04</strong>78-1<br />

IAPR 15 2<strong>04</strong>1


_I Defendants.<br />

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK<br />

COUNTY OF NEW YORK<br />

IN RE: NEW YOKK. COIJN7'Y i NYCAL<br />

ASBESTOS LITIGATION<br />

i I.A.S. Part 30<br />

_I .-<br />

i (Heitler,<br />

,<br />

J.)<br />

,<br />

THIS DOCUMENT REFERS TO:<br />

i Index No.: 1 18502/00<br />

TINA MARIE MCGOWENS, PERSONAL<br />

REPRESENTATIVE FOR THE ESTATE OF<br />

CONRAD LACHANCE,<br />

i \ NO OPPOSITION<br />

-against-<br />

i SUMMARY JUDGMENT<br />

Plaintiffs, \ MOTION AND ORDER<br />

A. C. & S., TNC., et al.,<br />

i<br />

WHEREFORE, defendant, Treadwell Corporation, hereby requests summary judgment in<br />

the above entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules 5 3212, dismissing plaintiffs'<br />

complaint against defendant, Treadwell Corporation, with prejudice in this action, and there<br />

being no opposition thereto,<br />

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against<br />

defendant, Treadwell Corporation, be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and<br />

without costs.<br />

Dated: New York, New Yoxk<br />

Treadwell Corporation<br />

MCGIVNEY & KLUGER, P.C.<br />

80 Broad Street-Suite 2300<br />

New York, New York 100<strong>04</strong><br />

(212) 509-3456<br />

Estate of Conrad Lachance<br />

WElTZ & LUXENBERG, P.C.<br />

700 Broadway<br />

New York, New York 10003<br />

(212) 558-5500<br />

FILED<br />

APR 2 6 20<strong>11</strong><br />

SO ORDERED,


SI IPKEME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK<br />

- C33IJN'I'Y _-- OF NEW YORK _____----<br />

IN RE: NEW YOKK COUNTY<br />

! NYCAL,<br />

ASBESTOS LlTlGATlON j 1.A.S. Part 30<br />

j (Heitler, J.)<br />

-_____"___L__~-__I_<br />

TkIE DOCUMENT REFERS TO:<br />

lndex No.: <strong>11</strong> S679/00<br />

ELVIM M. DUBRITZ, EXECIJTRIX FOR THE<br />

ESTATE OF MICHAEL DUBRITZ,<br />

NO OPPOSITION<br />

Plaintiffs, SUMMARY JUDGMENT<br />

MOTION AND ORDER<br />

-against-<br />

A. C. & S., INC., et al.,<br />

Defendants.<br />

i<br />

WHEREFORE, defendant, Patterson Pump Co., hereby requests summary judgment in<br />

the above entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules 4 3212, dismissing plaintiffs'<br />

complaint against defendant, Patterson Pump Co., with prejudice in this action, and there being<br />

no opposition thereto,<br />

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against<br />

defendant, Patterson Pump Co., be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and without<br />

costs.<br />

MCGIVNEY & KLUGER, P.C.<br />

80 Broad ftreet-Suite 2300<br />

New York, New York 100<strong>04</strong><br />

(2 12) 509-3456<br />

SO ORDERED,<br />

Estate of Michael DuBritz<br />

WEITZ & LUXENBERG, P.C.<br />

700 Broadway<br />

New York, New York 10 3<br />

FILED<br />

APR 2 6 20<strong>11</strong><br />

454-1%FW YORK<br />

COUNTY CLERKS OFFICE]


~<br />

SUPREME COlJKT OF 'THE STATE OF NEW YOKK<br />

--- COUNTY OF NEW YON<br />

"-__--_I--<br />

IN RE: NEW YORK COUNTY<br />

i NYCAL<br />

ASBESTOS LITlGATXON j I.A.S. Part 30<br />

L<br />

-_- 1 (Heitler, J.)<br />

THIS DOCUMENT REFERS TO:<br />

ELVIM M. DU BRITZ, INDIVIDUALLY AND<br />

AS EXECUTRIX FOR THE ESTATE OF<br />

MICHAEL DU BRITZ,<br />

Plaintiffs,<br />

t Index No.: <strong>11</strong> 8679/00<br />

i<br />

j<br />

NO OPPOSITION<br />

SUMMARY JUDGMENT<br />

MOTION AND ORDER<br />

-against-<br />

A. C. & S., INC., et al.,<br />

-<br />

Defendants. ;<br />

WHEREFORE, defendant, Courter & Company, Inc., hereby requests summary<br />

judgment in the above entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules $ 3212, dismissing<br />

plaintiffs' complaint against defendant, Courter & Company, Inc., with prejudice in this action,<br />

and there being no opposition thereto,<br />

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against<br />

defendant, Courter & Company, Inc., be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and<br />

without costs.<br />

Attorney for Defendant<br />

Courter & Company, Jnc.<br />

MCGIVNEY & KLUGER, P.C.<br />

80 Broad Street-Suite 2300<br />

New York, New Y ork 100<strong>04</strong><br />

(212) 509-3456<br />

SO OmERED,<br />

Estate of Michael DuBritz<br />

WEITZ & LUXENBERG, P.C.<br />

700 Broadway<br />

New York,NewYork 10003 APR 2 6 20<strong>11</strong><br />

3W938<br />

NEW YORK<br />

Nn CLERKS OFFICE)<br />

N0<strong>04</strong><strong>04</strong>78-1


SLJYREME COIJR'P OF THE STATE OF NEW YON<br />

COUNTY OF NEW YON<br />

IN-FNEW YOKK CZUNTY<br />

i NYCAL<br />

ASBESTOS LITIGATION<br />

i I.A.S. Part 30<br />

- i (Heitler, 3.)<br />

THIS DOCUMENT REFERS TO:<br />

ELVIRA M. DUBRITZ, INDIVIDUALLY AND<br />

AS EXECUTRIX FOR THE ESTATE OF<br />

MICHAEL DUBRITZ,<br />

-against-<br />

A. C. & S., INC., et al.,<br />

j Index No.: 1 18679/00<br />

!<br />

[ NO OPPOSITION<br />

i SUMMARY JUDGMENT<br />

Plaintiffs, i MOTION AND ORDER<br />

Defendants. !<br />

WHEREFORE, defendant, Tishman Liquidating Cop., hereby requests summary<br />

judgment in the above entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules 8 3212, dismissing<br />

plaintiffs' complaint against defendant, Tishman Liquidating Cop, with prejudice in this action,<br />

and there being no opposition thereto,<br />

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against<br />

defendant, Tishman Liquidating Corp., be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and<br />

without costs.<br />

80 Broad Street-Suite 2300<br />

New York, New York 100<strong>04</strong><br />

Estate of Michael DuBritz<br />

WEITZ&LUXENBERG,P.C. F \ L E D<br />

700 Broadway<br />

New York, New York 10003<br />

(212) SO9-3456 (212) 558-5500 APR 2 6 ZO'<br />

SO ORDERED,<br />

NEW WRK<br />

z38eSeff.rru CLERKS OFFICE<br />

N0<strong>04</strong><strong>04</strong>78-I


I<br />

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YOKK<br />

I_ COUNTY OF NEW YORK<br />

IN RE: NEW YORK COUNTY<br />

i NYCAI,<br />

ASBESTOS LITlGATION<br />

i I.A.S. Part 30<br />

i (Heitler, J.><br />

THIS DOCUMENTREFERS ‘ro:<br />

E1,VIRA M. DU BRITZ, INDIVID‘IJALLY AND<br />

AS EXECUTRIX FOR THE ESTATE OF<br />

MICHAEL DU BRITZ,<br />

-against-<br />

A. C. & S., INC., et al.,<br />

Plaintiffs,<br />

j Index No.: 1 18679/00<br />

i<br />

i<br />

NO OPPOSITION<br />

i SUMMARY JUDGMENT<br />

j MOTION AND ORDER<br />

Defendants.<br />

j<br />

WHEREFORE, defendant, Treadwell Corporation, hereby requests summary judgment in<br />

the above entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules 0 3212, dismissing plaintiffs’<br />

complaint against defendant, Treadwell Corporation, with prejudice in this action, and there<br />

being no opposition thereto,<br />

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against<br />

defendant, Treadwell Corporation, be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and<br />

without costs.<br />

Michele J. Mittleman, Esq.<br />

Attorney for Defendant<br />

Treadwell Corporation<br />

MCGIVNEY & KLUGER, P.C.<br />

WEITZ & LUXENBERG, P.C.<br />

80 Broad Street-Suite 2300 700 Broadway 6 ZQII<br />

New York. New York 100<strong>04</strong><br />

New York, New York 10003 APR<br />

(212) 509-3456 (212) 558-5500<br />

SO ORDERED,<br />

1235-2461<br />

OFF\=<br />

N0<strong>04</strong><strong>04</strong>78-1


SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK<br />

couN'ry OF NEW YORK<br />

IN RE: NEW YOU com-ry<br />

--~__-.-<br />

NYCAL<br />

ASBESTOS LITIGATION<br />

i I.A.S. Part 30<br />

i (Heitler, J.)<br />

-~---- -.-A<br />

THIS DOCUMENT REFERS TO:<br />

BR1DGET JONES, ADMINISTRATRIX FOR !<br />

THE ESTATE OF CHARLES E. WILLIAMS,<br />

j<br />

i NO OPPOSITION<br />

Plaintiffs, i SUMMARY JUDGMENT<br />

j MOTION AND ORDER<br />

-against-<br />

A. C. & S., PIC+, et al.,<br />

---- Defendants. j<br />

i<br />

WHEREFORE, defendant, Treadwell Corporation, hereby requests summary judgment in<br />

the above entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules $ 3212, dismissing plaintiffs'<br />

complaint against defendant, Treadwell Corporation, with prejudice in this action, and there<br />

being no opposition thereto,<br />

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against<br />

defendant, Treadwell Corporation, be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and<br />

without costs.<br />

Dated: New Yoyk, New York<br />

llih<br />

- --<br />

Michele J. Mittlekan, Esq.<br />

Attorney for Defendant<br />

Treadwell Corporation<br />

MCGTVNEY & UUGER, P.C.<br />

80 Broad Street-Suite 2300<br />

New York, New York 100<strong>04</strong><br />

(212) 509-3456<br />

SO ORDERED,<br />

F a<br />

Attorney fo<br />

Estate of Charles E. Williams<br />

WElTZ & LUXENBERG, P.C.<br />

700 Broadway<br />

New York, New York 10003<br />

D<br />

APR 2 6 '"'<br />

V g y J yQHK<br />

CQUN-Ty CLERKS OFF'^'<br />

1235-1508


SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK<br />

COUNTY OF NEW YORK<br />

' NYCAL<br />

BRIDGET JONES, as Administratrix for the Estate of :<br />

part 3o<br />

CHARLES E. WILLIAMS,<br />

: (Hon. Sherry Klein Heitler)<br />

Plaintiff(s),<br />

1 Index No.: <strong>11</strong>9159-00<br />

-against-<br />

NO-OPPOSITION SUMMARY<br />

JUDGMENT MOTION AND<br />

A.C. & S., INC., et al.,<br />

: ORDER<br />

Defendants.<br />

WHEREFORE, defendant CRANE CO. hereby requests summary judgment in the<br />

above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212, dismissing<br />

plaintiff's complaint against defendant CRANE CO. with prejudice, and there being no<br />

opposition thereto,<br />

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against<br />

defendant CRANE CO. be, and the same are hereby, dismissed with prejudice and without costs.<br />

Dated:<br />

3 \ >e\?<br />

New York. New York<br />

I .<br />

Kirste<br />

J<br />

Alford Kneis, Esq.<br />

WEITZ & LUXENBERG, P.C.<br />

K& GATESLLP<br />

Attorneys for Plaintiff(s)<br />

At meys for Defendant APR 2 6 20<strong>11</strong><br />

700 Broadway CRANE CO.<br />

New York, NY 10003<br />

(212) 558-5500<br />

599 Lexington Avenue<br />

New York, NY 10022<br />

(212) 536-3900<br />

$qJv YORM<br />

pnlj(v r'q CLERK'S OFFICE,<br />

SO ORDERED,<br />

Hon. Sherry Klein Heitler


__I-<br />

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK<br />

-__I.- COUN'I'Y OF NEW YOKK<br />

IN RE: NEW YORK couN'ry<br />

! NYCAL<br />

ASRESI'OS LITIGATION<br />

j 1.A.S. Part 30<br />

i (Heitler, J.)<br />

-___ -A<br />

THIS DOCUMENT REFERS TO:<br />

j Index No.: <strong>11</strong>9159/0<br />

BRIDGET JONES, ADMINISTRATRIX FOR !<br />

THE ESTATE OF CHARLES E. WILLIAMS,<br />

-against-<br />

A. C. & S., NC., et UL,<br />

! NO OPPOSITTON<br />

Plaintiffs, i SUMMARY JUDGMENT<br />

; MOTION AND ORDER<br />

Defendants.<br />

i<br />

WHEREFORE, defendant, Treadwell Corporation, hereby requests summary judgment in<br />

the above entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules 5 3212, dismissing plaintiffs'<br />

complaint against defendant, Treadwell Corporation, with prejudice in this action, and there<br />

being no opposition thereto,<br />

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against<br />

defendant, Treadwell Corporation, be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and<br />

without costs.<br />

Attorney for Defendant<br />

Treadwell Corporation<br />

M c G ~ & Y KLUGER, P.C.<br />

80 Broad Street-Suite 2300<br />

New York, New York 100<strong>04</strong> . New York, New York 10003


SUPREME CQTJKT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK<br />

COUNTY OF NEW YORK<br />

IN RE: NEW YON COUNTY<br />

! NYCAL<br />

ASBESTOS LITIGATION<br />

i I.A.S. Part 30<br />

i (Heitler, J . h<br />

THlS DOCUMENT EFERS TO:<br />

Index No/:J19376/09( 1070201/01<br />

ELIZABETH WALTER, INDIVIDUALY AND<br />

AS EXEC. FOR THE ESTATE OF THEODORE<br />

i<br />

F. WALKER, NO OPPOSITION<br />

i SUMMARY JUDGMENT<br />

Plaintiffs, MOTION AND ORDER<br />

-^__IC_-<br />

-against-<br />

A. C. & S., INC., etal.,<br />

Defendants.<br />

i<br />

WHEREFORE, defendant, Treadwell Corporation, hereby requests summary judgment in<br />

the above entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules 5 3212, dismissing plaintiffs’<br />

complaint against defendant, Treadwell Corporation, with prejudice in this action, and there<br />

being no opposition thereto,<br />

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against<br />

defendant, Treadwell Corporation, be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and<br />

without costs.<br />

Attorney for Defendant<br />

Treadwell Corporation<br />

MCGlVNEY & UUGER, P.C.<br />

80 Broad Street-Suite 2300<br />

New York, New York 100<strong>04</strong><br />

(212) 509-3456<br />

SO ORDERED,<br />

700 Broadway<br />

New York, New York 10003<br />

1<br />

APB 2 ””<br />

N0<strong>04</strong><strong>04</strong>78-1<br />

APR 15 20<strong>11</strong>


' I<br />

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK<br />

COUNTY OF NEW YON<br />

--<br />

IN RE: NEW YQRK COUNTY<br />

ASBESTOS LITIGATION<br />

THIS DOCUMENT R~FERS TO:<br />

: NYCAL<br />

j I.A.S. Part 30<br />

: (Heitler, J.)<br />

JOAN C. SPARLING, AS EXECUTRIX FOR<br />

THE ESTATE OF OSCAR H. SPARLING, AND<br />

JOAN C. SPARLING, INDIVIDUALLY,<br />

j<br />

A. C. & S., INC., et al.,<br />

Plaintiffs, j NO OPPOSITION<br />

i SUMMARY JUDGMENT<br />

-against- j MOTION AND ORDER<br />

-<br />

Defendants. ;<br />

WHEREFORE, defendant, Oakfabco, Inc., hereby requests summary judgment in the<br />

above entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules 5 3212, dismissing plaintiffs'<br />

complaint against defendant, Oakfabco, Inc., with prejudice in this action, and there being no<br />

opposition thereto,<br />

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against<br />

defendant, Oakfabco, Inc., be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and without<br />

costs.<br />

Dated: New York, New York<br />

Attorney for Defendant<br />

Oakfabco, Inc.<br />

MCGIVNEY & KLUGER, P.C.<br />

80 Broad Street-Suite 2300<br />

New York, New York 100<strong>04</strong><br />

(2 12) 509-3456<br />

SO ORDERED,<br />

-<br />

E<br />

Estate of Oscar H. Sparling<br />

WEITZ & LUXENBERG, P.C.<br />

700 Broadway<br />

New York, New York 10003 APR 2 6 20<strong>11</strong><br />

NEW YORK<br />

COUNTY CLERK'S OFFICk<br />

2571-07568<br />

N0<strong>04</strong><strong>04</strong>74-1<br />

"T 1520<strong>11</strong>'


SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK<br />

COIJNTY OF NEW YORK<br />

IN RE: NEW YOFX COUNTY<br />

NYCAL<br />

ASBESTOS LITIGATION<br />

I.A.S. Part 30<br />

(Heitler, J.)<br />

THIS DOCUMENT REFERS TO:<br />

DONNA M. MEDER, PERSONAL<br />

REPRESENTATIVE FOR THE ESTATE OF<br />

DONALD E. SIERING,<br />

-against-<br />

A. C. & S., INC., el al.,<br />

Plaintiffs,<br />

Defendants.<br />

G%P<br />

Index No. <strong>11</strong>9379/0 107081/01,<br />

NO OPPOSITION<br />

SUMMARY JUDGMENT<br />

MOTION AND ORDER<br />

WHEREFORE, defendant, Treadwell Corporation, hereby requests summary judgment in<br />

the above entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules 5 3212, dismissing plaintiffs’<br />

complaint against defendant, Treadwell Corporation, with prejudice in this action, and there<br />

being no opposition thereto,<br />

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against<br />

defendant, Treadwell Corporation, be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and<br />

without costs.<br />

Dated: New York, New York<br />

Attorney for Defendant<br />

Treadwell Corporation<br />

MCG~VNEY & UUGER, P.C.<br />

SO Broad Street-Suite 2300<br />

New York, New York 100<strong>04</strong><br />

(212) 509-3456<br />

SO ORDERED,<br />

WEITZ & LUXENBERG, P.C.<br />

700 Broadway<br />

D<br />

N0<strong>04</strong><strong>04</strong>78-1


I<br />

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK<br />

COUNTY OF NEW YORK<br />

EDWARD R. SKELLEY and BARBARA J.<br />

SKELLEY,<br />

A.C. & S., INC., et al.,<br />

Plaintiff( s),<br />

-against-<br />

Defendants.<br />

______________________________________II----~-----"---------*--_-<br />

X<br />

NYCAL<br />

I.A.S. Part 30<br />

: (Hon. Sherry Klein Heitler)<br />

: Index No(s).: <strong>11</strong>9379-00<br />

NO-OPPOSITION SUMMARY<br />

JUDGMENT MOTION AND<br />

: ORDER<br />

WHEREFORE, defendant CRANE CO. hereby requests summary judgment in the<br />

above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212, dismissing<br />

plaintiffs' complaint against defendant CRANE CO. with prejudice, and there being no<br />

opposition thereto,<br />

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against<br />

defendant CRANE CO. be, and the same are hereby, dismissed with prejudice and without costs.<br />

Dated: 3 \ 3 a\ \\<br />

New York, New York<br />

P<br />

WEITZ & LUXENBERG, P.CT<br />

K&L ATESLLP<br />

Attorneys for Plaintiff(s)<br />

Att eys for Defendant<br />

700 Broadway<br />

CRANE CO.<br />

New York, NY 10003<br />

599 Lexington Avenue<br />

(212) 558-5500 New York, NY 10022<br />

SO ORDERED,<br />

Hon. Sherry Klein Heitler<br />

APl? 15 20<strong>11</strong>


SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YON<br />

-_. COUNTY OF NEW YORK - -<br />

IN RE: NEW YORK COUNTY<br />

i NYCA1,<br />

ASBESTOS LITIGATION j I.A.S. Part 30<br />

j (Heitler, 1.)<br />

THIS DOCTJMENT REFERS TO:<br />

EDWARD R. SKELLEY AND BARBARA J.<br />

SKELLEY,<br />

-against-<br />

Plaintiffs,<br />

i NO OPPOSITION<br />

i SUMMARY JUDGMENT<br />

MOTION AND ORDER<br />

i<br />

A. C. & S., NC., et al.,<br />

Defendants.<br />

j<br />

WHEREFORE, defendant, Treadwell Corporation, hereby requests summary judgment in<br />

the above entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules § 3212, dismissing plaintiffs’<br />

complaint against defendant, Treadwell Corporation, with prejudice in this action, and there<br />

being no opposition thereto,<br />

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against<br />

defendant, Treadwell Corporation, be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and<br />

without costs.<br />

Dated: New York, New York<br />

Treadwell Corporation<br />

MCGIVNEY & KLUGER, P.C.<br />

80 Broad Street-Suite 2300<br />

New York, New York 100<strong>04</strong><br />

(212) 509-3456<br />

SO ORDEED,<br />

N0<strong>04</strong><strong>04</strong>78-1<br />

EdwardR. Skelley and Barbara J. Skeiley<br />

WEITZ & LUXENBERG, P.C.<br />

700 Broadway F\b<br />

New York, New York 30003<br />

APR 2 6 20<strong>11</strong><br />

APR 1520<strong>11</strong><br />

couNn<br />

1235-2334<br />

\\pVV VOW<br />

CLERKS OFFICE


SIJPEME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YOFX<br />

COUNTY OF NEW YO=<br />

IN RE: NEW YORK COUNTY<br />

! NYCAL<br />

ASBESTOS LITIGATION<br />

i I.A.S. Part 30<br />

j (Heitler, J.)<br />

’THIS DOCUMENT REFERS TO:<br />

ANTHONY MODAFFERI,<br />

-against-<br />

A. C. & S., INC., et al.,<br />

Plaintiffs, j NO OPPOSITION<br />

! SUMMARY JUDGMENT<br />

! MOTION AND 0RI)ER<br />

Defendants. \<br />

WHEREFORE, defendant, Treadwell Corporation, hereby requests summary judgment in<br />

the above entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice LAW<br />

and Rules 0 3212, dismissing plaintiffs’<br />

complaint against defendant, Treadwell Corporation, with prejudice in this action, and there<br />

being no opposition thereto,<br />

ORDERJD, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against<br />

defendant, Treadwell Corporation, be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and<br />

without costs.<br />

Dated: New York, New York<br />

V I ,20<strong>11</strong><br />

Carol M. Tempesta, Esq.<br />

Attorney for Defendant<br />

Treadwell Corporation<br />

MCGIVNEY & KLUGER, P.C.<br />

80 Broad Street-Suite 2300<br />

New York, New York IO00<br />

(212) 509-3456<br />

SO ORDERED,<br />

Anthony Modafferi<br />

WEITZ & LUXENBERG, P.C.<br />

700 Broadway<br />

APR T 6 2021<br />

1235-1455d ki’L’ yc:JRf<br />

’ WERK‘S OFFICE<br />

N0<strong>04</strong><strong>04</strong>78-1


SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YON<br />

COUNTY OF NEW YORK<br />

IN RE: NEW Y0R.K COIJNTY<br />

i<br />

ASBESTOS LITIGATION<br />

wis D~CUMENT REFERS TO:<br />

NYCAL<br />

j I.A.S. Part 30<br />

j (Heitler, 3.)<br />

CLARA M. LIGAMMARE, INDIVIDUALLY<br />

AND AS EXECUTRIX FOR THE ESTATE OF<br />

LAWRENCE LIGAMMARE,<br />

-against-<br />

Plaintiffs,<br />

j<br />

i NO OPPOSITION<br />

j SUMMARY JUDGMENT<br />

i MOTION AND OIU)ER<br />

A. C. & S., INC., et al.,<br />

Defendants.<br />

WHEREFORE, defendant, Treadwell Corporation, hereby requests summary judgment in<br />

the above entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules 5 3212, dismissing plaintiffs'<br />

complaint against defendant, Treadwell Corporation, with prejudice in this action, and there<br />

being no opposition thereto,<br />

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against<br />

defendant, Treadwell Corporation, be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and<br />

without costs.<br />

Carol M. Tempesta, Esq.<br />

Attorney for Defendant<br />

Treadwell Corporation<br />

MCGIWY & KLUGER, P.C.<br />

80 Broad Street-Suite 2300<br />

New York, New York 100<strong>04</strong><br />

(212) 509-3456<br />

SO ORDERED,<br />

Estate of Lawrence Liga<br />

700 Broadway<br />

New York, New York 10003<br />

&PR 2 6 Nil<br />

(212) 558-5500<br />

YORK<br />

OFWE<br />

pK's


NYCAL<br />

I.A.S. Part 30<br />

Hon. Sherry Klein Heitler, J.S.C.<br />

FRANK LUIS1 and HELEN LUISI,<br />

<strong>11</strong>9382-2000<br />

Plaintiffs,<br />

-against-<br />

A.O. SMITH WATER PRODUCTS, et al. including,<br />

FOSTER WHEELER CORPORATION,<br />

NO OPPOSITION SUMMARY JUDGMENT<br />

MOTION AND ORDER<br />

Defendants.<br />

WHEREFORE, defendant FOSTER WHEELER, L.L.C. (sued herein as “FOSTER WHEELER<br />

CORPORATION”) hereby request summary judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil<br />

Practice Law and Rules Section 3212, dismissing plaintiffs’ complaint against defendant FOSTER<br />

WHEELER, L.L.C. with prejudice, and there being no opposition thereto,<br />

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against defendant<br />

FOSTER WHEELER, L.L.C. be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and without costs.<br />

Weitz & Luxenberg, P.C.<br />

Attorney for Plaintffs<br />

700 Broadway<br />

New York, New York<br />

SO ORDERED, -<br />

Sedgwick, Detert, Moran & Arnold, LLP<br />

Attorneys for Foster Wheeler, L. L.C.<br />

Three Gateway Center, 12‘h Floor<br />

Newark, NJ 07102<br />

p\LED<br />

APR 2 6 ZO’’<br />

NJ/34 I76Ovl


SIJPREME COUKT OF THE STATE OF NEW YOKK<br />

._ COUNTY OF NEW YORK<br />

IN RE: NEW Y ON COUNTY<br />

ASBESTOS LITIGATION<br />

~-<br />

1’HIS DOCUMENT REFERS TO:<br />

ANN LATTANZIO, INDIVIDUALLY AND AS<br />

PERSONAL REPRESENTATIVE FOR THE<br />

ESTATE OF GIOVANNI LATTANZIO,<br />

-against-<br />

A. C. & S., NC., et a].,<br />

Plaintiffs,<br />

Defendants.<br />

NYCAL<br />

I.A.S. Part 30<br />

(Heitler, J.)<br />

GG2<br />

Index No . 1 1 9383/00 102<strong>26</strong>9/01,<br />

NO OPPOSITION<br />

SUMMARY JUDGMENT<br />

MOTION AND 0-ER<br />

WHEREFORE, defendant, Treadwell Corporation, hereby requests summary judgment in<br />

the above entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules $ 3212, dismissing plaintiffs’<br />

complaint against defendant, Treadwell Corporation, with prejudice in this action, and there<br />

being no opposition thereto,<br />

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against<br />

defendant, Treadwell Corporation, be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and<br />

without costs.<br />

Dated: New York New York<br />

q/1 ’ ,20<strong>11</strong><br />

WAmL<br />

b<br />

Carol M. Ternpesta,bq.<br />

Attorney for Defendant<br />

Treadwell corporation<br />

MCGlVNEY & KLUGER, P.C.<br />

80 Broad Street-Suite 2300<br />

New York, New York 100<strong>04</strong><br />

(212) 509-3456<br />

WEITZ & LUXENBERG, P.<br />

700 Broadway<br />

rk, New York 10003<br />

kpir ‘i‘ 6 21TT1<br />

SO ORDERED, Pi’’ ‘; ’kr2y


ASBESTOS LITIGATION i I.A.S. Part 30<br />

_" j (Heitler, J.)<br />

THIS IIOCIJMENTEFERS TO:<br />

ANN LATTANZIO, INDIVIDUALLY AND AS<br />

PERSONAL REPRESENTATIVE FOR TI 1E<br />

ESTATE OF GIOVANNI LATTANZIO,<br />

-against-<br />

A. C. & S., INC7 et al.,<br />

_- Defendants. i<br />

\<br />

G<br />

Index No.. 19383/00 02<strong>26</strong>9/01,<br />

i<br />

i NO OPPOSITlON<br />

Plaintiffs, \ SUMMARY JUDGMENT<br />

f MOTION AND ORDER<br />

WHEREFORE, defendant, Oakfabco, Inc., hereby requests summary judgment in the<br />

above entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules 5 3212, dismissing plaintiffs'<br />

complaint against defendant, Oakfabco, lnc., wtth prejudice in this action, and there being no<br />

opposition thereto,<br />

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against<br />

defendant, Oakfabco, Inc., be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and without<br />

costs.<br />

Dated: New York, New York<br />

cl( ,201 1<br />

by=ld GL,<br />

2 \-<br />

Robert Darish, Esq.<br />

Attorney for Defendant<br />

Oakfabco, lnc.<br />

MCGIVNEY & KLUGER, P.C.<br />

SO Broad Street-Suite 2300<br />

New York, New York 10-<br />

I<br />

700 Broadway 20<strong>11</strong><br />

New York, New York 10003 APf? 2 6


SIJPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK<br />

COUNTY OF NEW YORK<br />

IN RE: NEW YORK COUNTY j NYCAL<br />

ASHESTOS LITIGATION<br />

j I.A.S. Part 30<br />

- j (Heitler, J.)<br />

'l'HJS DOCUMEfiT-REFERS TO -<br />

CARL KROGER AND CAROL ANN KROGER,<br />

A. C. & S., INC., et al.,<br />

j Index No.: <strong>11</strong>9383/00<br />

i<br />

Plaintiffs, i NO OPPOSITION<br />

i SUMMARY JUDGMENT<br />

-against- j MOTION AND ORDER<br />

Defendants.<br />

WHEREFORE, defendant, Safeguard Industrial Equipment Co., hereby requests<br />

summary judgment in the above entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules § 3212,<br />

dismissing plaintiffs' complaint against defendant, Safeguard Industrial Equipment Co., with<br />

prejudice in this action, and there being no opposition thereto,<br />

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against<br />

defendant, Safeguard Industrial Equipment Co., be and the same are hereby dismissed with<br />

prejudice and without costs.<br />

Matthew T. Fairley, Esq.<br />

Attorney for Defendant<br />

Safeguard Industrial Equipment Co.<br />

MCGIVNEY & KLUGER, P.C.<br />

80 Broad Street-Suite 2300<br />

New York, New York 100<strong>04</strong><br />

(212) 509-3456<br />

SO OWERED,<br />

&-& - (-**<br />

&.<br />

++<br />

?<br />

=.*.&<br />

i> A<br />

Le"*' 9,<br />

\,<br />

rCY*."C<br />

-4 b. O*z, bt&. ...,-T<br />

Attorney for Plaintiffs 1:<br />

Carl Kroger and Carol Ann K<br />

WEITZ & LUXENBERG, P.C.<br />

700 Broadway<br />

New York, New York 10003<br />

(212) 558-5500<br />

APR 2 6 20<strong>11</strong><br />

NEW YOWK<br />

3G-wp<br />

CLERK'S OFFICE'<br />

N0<strong>04</strong><strong>04</strong>78-1


SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK<br />

COUNTY OF NEW YORK<br />

IN RE: NEW YORK CITY ASBESTOS LITIGATION<br />

CARL KROGER and CAROL ANN KROGER,<br />

Plaintiff(s j,<br />

-against-<br />

A.C. & S., INC., et al.,<br />

Defendants.<br />

NYCAL<br />

: I.A.S. Part 30<br />

(Hon. Sherry Klein Heitler)<br />

* Index No.: <strong>11</strong>9383-00<br />

: NO-OPPOSITION SUMMARY<br />

JUDGMENT MOTION AND<br />

ORDER<br />

___r__r_________________________________--------------~~---------<br />

X<br />

WHEREFORE, defendant CRANE CO. hereby requests summary judgment in the<br />

above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 32 12, dismissing<br />

plaintiffs' complaint against defendant CRANE CO. with prejudice, and there being no<br />

opposition thereto,<br />

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against<br />

defendant CRANE CO. be, and the same are hereby, dismissed with prejudice and without costs.<br />

Dated:<br />

3 \?Y o\\\,<br />

New York, New York<br />

Attorneys for Plaintiff(s)<br />

700 Broadway CRANE CO.<br />

New York, NY 10003<br />

599 Lexington Avenue<br />

(212) 558-5500<br />

New York, NY 10022<br />

-..-_^.<br />

(212) 536-3900<br />

p<br />

SO ORDERED,<br />

Hon. Sherry Klein Heitler


SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK<br />

COIJNTY OF NEW YORK<br />

1N RE: NEW YORK COUNl'Y<br />

j NYCAL<br />

ASBESTOS J,XTIGATION<br />

i I.A.S. Part 30<br />

! (Heitler, 3.)<br />

THIS DOCUMENT REFERS To:<br />

i Index No.: <strong>11</strong>9383/00<br />

CARL KROGER AND CAROL ANN KROGER, i<br />

-.<br />

-against-<br />

Plaintiffs, / NO OPPOSITION<br />

SUMMARY JUDGMENT<br />

! MOTION AND ORDER<br />

A. C. & S., NC., et al.,<br />

Defendants.<br />

j<br />

WHEREFORE, defendant, Treadwell Corporation, hereby requests summary judgment in<br />

the above entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules § 3212, dismissing plaintiffs'<br />

complaint against defendant, Treadwell Corporation, with prejudice in this action, and there<br />

being no opposition thereto,<br />

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against<br />

defendant, Treadwell Corporation, be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and<br />

without costs.<br />

Dated: New York New York<br />

a//, ,20<strong>11</strong><br />

b E-*%, ,#<br />

WB<br />

Carol M. Tempesta, E&,<br />

Attorney for Defendant<br />

Treadwell Corporation<br />

McG~VNEY & KLUGER, P.C.<br />

80 Broad Street-Suite 2300<br />

New York, New York 100<strong>04</strong> York, New York 10003<br />

(212) 509-3456<br />

SO ORDERED,<br />

p@-uMA Jn- ow7<br />

Attorney for Plaintiffs<br />

Carl Kroger and Carol Ann Kroger<br />

WEITZ & LUXENBERG, P.C.<br />

700 Broadway F\LEQ<br />

j@R 2 6 m'<br />

N0<strong>04</strong><strong>04</strong>78-1


I Defendants.<br />

S‘CJPREME COUK’L’ OF ‘[TIE S’I’A‘I’E OF NEW Y ORK<br />

___-___ COUNTY OF _-__ NEW<br />

I.-I.<br />

YORK<br />

-+-<br />

IN RE: NEW YOKK COUNTY<br />

i NYCAL<br />

ASBESTOS LITIGATION<br />

- I-_--<br />

_-<br />

i I.A.S. Part 30<br />

! (Heitler, J.)<br />

I-<br />

THIS DOCU=~€;FERS TO:<br />

/ Index No.: <strong>11</strong>9383/00<br />

CARL KROGEIZ AND CAROL ANN KROGER, i<br />

-against-<br />

A. C. & S., INC., el a/+,<br />

Plaintiffs, i NO OPPOSITION<br />

SUMMARY JUDGMENT<br />

i MOTION AND ORDER<br />

!<br />

WI-IEREFORE, defendant, Oakfabco, Inc., hereby requests summary judgment in the<br />

above entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules<br />

3212, dismissing plaintiffs’<br />

complaint against defendant, Oakfabco, Inc., with prejudice in this action, and there being no<br />

opposition thereto,<br />

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against<br />

I<br />

defendant, Oakfabco, Inc., be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and without<br />

costs.<br />

Dated: New York, New York<br />

W[ ,20<strong>11</strong><br />

h\ -- u<br />

dosd Darish, Esq.<br />

Attorney for Defendant<br />

Oakfabco, Inc.<br />

MCGIVNEY & KLUGER, P.C.<br />

SO Broad Street-Suite 2300<br />

New York, New York 100<strong>04</strong><br />

(212) 509-3456<br />

SO ORDERED,<br />

ger and Carol Ann Krog<br />

WElTZ & LUXENBERG,<br />

700 Broadway<br />

New York, New York 10003<br />

FILED<br />

APR 2 6 20<strong>11</strong><br />

YORK<br />

COUNW 2571!d$~RKS<br />

N0<strong>04</strong><strong>04</strong>74-1<br />

hi ”,( 15 20<strong>11</strong><br />

l A


SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK<br />

--- COUNTY<br />

- OF NEW YORK __.-<br />

IN RE: NEW YORK town<br />

i NYCAL<br />

ASBESTOS LITIGATION<br />

i I.A.S. Part 30<br />

.-- ! (Heitler, J.)<br />

THIS DOCUMENT REFERS TO:<br />

SALVATORE RANDAZZO AND RHODA<br />

RANDAZZO,<br />

\ NO OPPOSITION<br />

Plaintiffs, i SUMMARY JUDGMENT<br />

i MOTION AND ORDER<br />

-against-<br />

A. C. & S., TNC., et al.,<br />

Defendants.<br />

j<br />

WHEREFORE, defendant, Treadwell Corporation, hereby requests summ r: J<br />

dgment in<br />

the above entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules § 3212, dismissing plaintiffs'<br />

complaint against defendant, Treadwell Corporation, with prejudice in this action, and there<br />

being no opposition thereto,<br />

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against<br />

defendant, Treadwell Corporation, be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and<br />

without costs.<br />

d{ ,20<strong>11</strong><br />

*h-<br />

Dated: New Yo k, New York<br />

Carol M. Tempesta, Esq.<br />

Attorney for Defendant<br />

Treadwell Corporation<br />

MCGIVNEY & UUGER, P.C.<br />

80 Broad Street-Suite 2300<br />

New York, New York 100<strong>04</strong><br />

and Rhoda Rand<br />

700 Broadway<br />

New York, New York 10003<br />

(2 12) 509-3456 m l(212) 558-5500<br />

1 /I<br />

N0<strong>04</strong><strong>04</strong>78-1


SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK<br />

COUNTY OF NEW YORK<br />

NYCAL<br />

I.A.S. Part 30<br />

Hon. Sherry Klein Heitler, J.S.C.<br />

LAWRENCE F. CAVES€ and ANNA CAVES€,<br />

-against-<br />

Plaintiffs,<br />

Index Na.: 1<br />

& 8 7 - 2 v<br />

NO OPPOSITION SUMMARY JUDGMENT<br />

MOTION AND ORDER<br />

AS. &S. INC., et al. including,<br />

FOSTER WHEELER CORPORATION,<br />

Defendants.<br />

WHEREFORE, defendant FOSTER WHEELER, L.L,C. (sued herein as "FOSTER WHEELER<br />

CORPORATION") hereby request summary judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil<br />

Practice Law and Rules Section 3212, dismissing plaintiffs' complaint against defendant FOSTER<br />

WHEELER, L.L.C. with prejudice, and there being no opposition thereto,<br />

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against defendant<br />

FOSTER WHEELER, L.L.C. be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and without costs.<br />

k<br />

Dated: New York New York<br />

Dennis E. Vega, Esq.<br />

Sedgwick, Detert, Moran & Arnold, LLP<br />

Attorney for Plaintiffs<br />

Attorneys for Foster Wheeler, L. L. C.<br />

700 Broadway<br />

Three Gateway Center, 12fh Floor<br />

New York, New York 100 wark, NJ 07102 FltED<br />

SO ORDERED, APR 2 6 20<strong>11</strong><br />

NEW YORK<br />

COUNTY CLERK'S OFFIG<br />

NJ/34 1 736v 1


_IL<br />

SUPREME CO'CJR1' OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK<br />

COUNTY OF NEW YORK<br />

-<br />

IN RE: NEW YORK COUN'TY<br />

i NYCAL<br />

AS BEST0 S LITIGATION<br />

j 1.A.S. Part 30<br />

THlS DOCUMENT REFERS TO:<br />

I<br />

ANNA E. RLENKENSOPP, INDIVIDUA1,LY<br />

AND PERSONAL REPRESENTATIVE FOR<br />

THE ESTATE OF DAVID BLENKENSOPP,<br />

Plaintiffs,<br />

i NO OPPOSITlON<br />

i SUMMARY JUDGMENT<br />

! MOTION AND ORDER<br />

-against-<br />

A. C. & S., INC., et a/.,<br />

---<br />

Defendants.<br />

j<br />

WHEREFORE, defendant, Courter & Company, Inc., hereby requests summary<br />

judgment in the above entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules 5 3212, dismissing<br />

plaintiffs' complaint against defendant, Courter & Company, Inc., with prejudice in this action,<br />

and there being no opposition thereto,<br />

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against<br />

defendant, Courter & Company, Inc., be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and<br />

without costs.<br />

Attorney for Defendant<br />

Courter & Company, Inc.<br />

MCGIVNEY & KLUGE& P.C.<br />

80 Broad Street-Suite 2300<br />

New York, New York 100<strong>04</strong><br />

(2 12) 509-3456<br />

SO ORDERED,<br />

Estate of David Blenkensopp<br />

WEITZ & LUXENBERG, P.C.<br />

700 Broadway<br />

New York, New York 10003 FILED<br />

2 6 20<strong>11</strong><br />

N0<strong>04</strong><strong>04</strong>78-1


c_ -<br />

~<br />

SIJPREME couw OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK<br />

ASBESTOS LlTIGATION i I.A.S. Part 30<br />

j (Heitler? J.)<br />

THIS DOCUMENT REFERS TO: n<br />

Index F; <strong>11</strong>9388/~633/07<br />

ANNA E. BLENKENSOPP, INDIVIDUALLY<br />

AND PERSONAL REPFESENTATIVE FOR<br />

THE ESTATE OF DAVID BLENKENSQPP, NO OPPOSITION<br />

SUMMARY JUDGMENT<br />

Plaintiffs, MOTION AND ORDER<br />

-against-<br />

A. C. & S., TNC., et a/.,<br />

Defendants.<br />

WHEREFORE, defendant, Patterson Pump Co., hereby requests summary judgment in<br />

the above entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules 5 32 12, dismissing plaintiffs'<br />

complaint against defendant, Patterson Pump Co., with prejudice in this action, and there being<br />

no opposition thereto,<br />

ORDERED, that upan notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against<br />

defendant, Patterson Pump Co,, be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and without<br />

costs.<br />

Attorney for Defendant<br />

Patterson Pump Co.<br />

MCGWY & UUGER, P.C.<br />

80 Broad Street-Suite 2300<br />

New York, New York 100<strong>04</strong><br />

(212) 509-3456<br />

SO ORDERED,<br />

Attorney for Plaintiffs<br />

Estate of David Blenkensop<br />

WElTZ & LUXENBERG, P.C.<br />

700 Broadwav<br />

NK h' YORK<br />

COUNTY CLERK'S OFFICE'<br />

454-9039<br />

I<br />

N0<strong>04</strong><strong>04</strong>7S- 1


SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK<br />

COUNTY OF NEW YORK<br />

__<br />

IN RE: NEW YORK COUNTY<br />

: NYCAL<br />

ASBESTOS LITIGATION<br />

i I.A.S. Part 30<br />

-.- ___ _-_.X7-_I -A-<br />

'rm DOCUMENX-FERS<br />

TO:<br />

ANNA E. BLENKENSOPP, INDIVIDUA1,LY<br />

i<br />

AND PERSONAL REPRESENTATIVE FOR<br />

j<br />

THE ESTATE OF DAVID BLENKENSOPP,<br />

[ NO OPPOSITION<br />

j SUMMARY JUDGMENT<br />

Plaintiffs, \ MOTION AND ORDER<br />

-against-<br />

A. C. & S., INC., et al.,<br />

Defendants.<br />

i<br />

WHEFEFORE, defendant, Safeguard Industrial Equipment Co., hereby requests<br />

summary judgment in the above entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules 6 3212,<br />

dismissing plaintiffs' complaint against defendant, Safeguard Industrial Equipment Co., with<br />

prejudice in this action, and there being no opposition thereto,<br />

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against<br />

defendant, Safeguard Industrial Equipment Co., be and the same are hereby dismissed with<br />

prejudice and without costs.<br />

Safeguard Industrial Equipment Co.<br />

MCGIVNEY & KLUGER, P.C.<br />

80 Broad Street-Suite 2300<br />

New York, New York 100<strong>04</strong><br />

(212) 509-3456<br />

SO ORDERED,<br />

1 L"E D<br />

Attorney for Plaintiffs<br />

Estate of David Blenkensopp<br />

WEITZ & LUXENBERG, P.C.<br />

700 Broadway<br />

New York 10003 kt?R 2 '6 20<strong>11</strong><br />

NEW YORK<br />

CLERK'S OFFIE]<br />

324-5661A<br />

N0<strong>04</strong><strong>04</strong>78-1


SUPREME COURT OF THE sxrE OF NEW YORK<br />

__ COUNTY OF NEW YORK<br />

IN FCE: NEW Y ~RK CO~JNTY i NYCAL<br />

ASBESTOS LITIGATION<br />

j I.A.S. Part 30<br />

-<br />

i (Heitler, J.)<br />

THIS DOCUMENT REFERS TO:<br />

0<br />

i Index 0.: <strong>11</strong>9388/00 <strong>04</strong>633/07<br />

ANNA E. BLENKENSOPP, INDIVIDUALLY !<br />

AND PERSONAL REPRESENTATIVE FOR<br />

THE ESTATE OF DAVID BLENKENSOPP, NO OPPOSITION<br />

i SUMMARY JUDGMENT<br />

Plaintiffs, i MOTION AND ORDER<br />

-against-<br />

A. C. & S., INC., et al.,<br />

Defendants. ;<br />

WHEREFORE, defendant, Tishman Liquidating Corp., hereby requests summary<br />

judgment in the above entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Q 3212, dismissing<br />

plaintiffs' complaint against defendant, 'Tishman Liquidating Corp., with prejudice in this action,<br />

and there being no opposition thereto,<br />

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against<br />

defendant, Tishman Liquidating Corp., be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and<br />

without costs.<br />

Dated: New York. New York<br />

F e y for DeffnJant<br />

ishman Liquida g Corp.<br />

MCGIVNEY & KLUGER, P.C.<br />

Estate df David Blenkenso<br />

WEITZ & LUXENBERG, P.C.<br />

80 Broad Street-Suite 2300 700 Broadway<br />

New York, New York 100<strong>04</strong> New York, New York 10003 ,#q 2 6 20<strong>11</strong><br />

(212) 509-3456 (212].558-5500<br />

SO ORDERED,<br />

nirw "QRK<br />

W&'N CLERKS QFF~CE'<br />

Hon. Sherry Klein Heitler 2383-22469 27650<br />

N0<strong>04</strong><strong>04</strong>78-1<br />

APR 15 2071


SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK<br />

COUNTY OF NEW YORK<br />

ANNA E. BLENKENSOPP, as Personal * ~ L I X Y ~ A T<br />

1Y Y LAL<br />

Representative for the Estate of DAVID<br />

* I.A.S. Part 30<br />

BLENKENSOPP and ANNA E. BLENKENSOPP, : Shew Klein Heitler)<br />

Individually,<br />

: Index No.: <strong>11</strong>9388-00<br />

Plainti ff(s),<br />

A.C. & S., TNC., et al.,<br />

-against-<br />

: NO-OPPOSITION SUMMARY<br />

: JUDGMENT MOTION AND<br />

: ORDER<br />

WHEREFORE, defendant CRANE CO. hereby requests summary judgment in the<br />

above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 32 12, dismissing<br />

plaintiffs complaint against defendant CRANE CO. with prejudice, and there being no<br />

opposition thereto,<br />

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against<br />

defendant CRANE CO. be, and the same are hereby, dismissed with prejudice and without costs,<br />

Dated: 3 \ 3 O\ [\<br />

New York, New York<br />

Attorneys for Plaintiff(s) APR 2 6 20<strong>11</strong><br />

700 Broadway CRANE CO.<br />

New York, NY 10003 599 Lexington Avenue NEW YORK<br />

(212) 558-5500 New York, NY lOOij!$~r\rr( CLERKS OFFICE<br />

SO ORDERED,<br />

Won. Sheny Klein Heitler<br />

APK 15 20<strong>11</strong>


SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YOKK<br />

COUNTY OF NEW YORK ~-<br />

IN RE: NEW FORK COUNTY-<br />

j NYCML<br />

ASBESTOS LI'I'IGATION<br />

j I.A.S. Part 30<br />

! (Heitler, J.)<br />

THIS DOCUMENT REFERS TO:<br />

e<br />

j Index N .: <strong>11</strong>9390/00 5<strong>26</strong>8/00<br />

BETTY BISHOP, INDIVIDUALLY AND<br />

EXECUTRIX FOR THE ESTATE OF ROBERT j<br />

D. BISHOP, SR., NO OPPOSITION<br />

j SUMMARY JUDGMENT<br />

Plaintiffs, i MOTION AND ORDER<br />

-against-<br />

A. C. & S., INC, et al.,<br />

Defendants. :<br />

WHEREFORE, defendant, Treadwell Corporation, hereby requests summary judgment in<br />

the above entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules $ 3212, dismissing plaintiffs'<br />

complaint against defendant, Treadwell Corporation, with prejudice in this action, and there<br />

being no opposition thereto,<br />

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against<br />

defendant, Treadwell Corporation, be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and<br />

without costs.<br />

Dated: New ork, New York<br />

20<strong>11</strong><br />

L%\*<br />

Carol M. Tempesta, Esq.<br />

Attorney for Defendant<br />

Treadwell Corporation<br />

I D<br />

MCGIVNEY & KLUGER, P.C.<br />

WElTZ & LUXENBERG, P.C.<br />

80 Broad Street-Suite 2300<br />

700 Broadway ~pFi 2 6 2Ol1<br />

New York, New York 100<strong>04</strong><br />

New York, New Y ork 10003<br />

(212) 509-3456 (212) 558-5500<br />

pJE.bq YORK<br />

SO ORDERED,<br />

CLEWS oFF\Cf<br />

Y 7, )<br />

couNn<br />

123520654<br />

NOW<strong>04</strong>78- 1<br />

APR I5 20<strong>11</strong>


_I<br />

SIJPREME COURT OF TIE STATE OF NEW YORK<br />

COUNTY OF NEW YORK -<br />

IN KE: NEW YORK cowry<br />

: NYCAL,<br />

ASRESTOS LITIGATION<br />

j I.A.S. Part 30<br />

-<br />

! (Heitler, J.)<br />

THIS DOCUMENT KEFERS TO:<br />

---- j Index 0.: <strong>11</strong>4390/0 25<strong>26</strong>8/00<br />

BETTY BISHOP, INDIVIDUALLY AND<br />

EXECUTRIX FOR THE ESTATE OF ROBERT I<br />

D. BISHOP, SR., NO OPPOSITION<br />

i SUMMARY JUDGMENT<br />

Plaintiffs, ; MOTION AND OWER<br />

-against-<br />

A. C. & S., NC., et al.,<br />

Defendants. 1<br />

WHEREFORE, defendant, Patterson Pump Co., hereby requests summary judgment in<br />

the above entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules 5 3212, dismissing plaintiffs'<br />

complaint against defendant, Patterson Pump Co., with prejudice in this action, and there being<br />

no opposition thereto,<br />

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against<br />

defendant, Patterson Pump Co., be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and without<br />

costs.<br />

Patterson Pump Co.<br />

MCGlVNEY & KLUGER, P.C.<br />

80 Broad Street-Suite 2300<br />

Estate of Robert D. Bishop, Sr.<br />

WEITZ & LUXENBERG, P.<br />

700 Broadway<br />

N0<strong>04</strong><strong>04</strong>78-1


- _-__--- __-- --------<br />

-- / Index 0.: <strong>11</strong>9390/0 , 125<strong>26</strong>8/00<br />

SlJPREME COURT OF THP: STATE OF NEW YORK<br />

COUNTY OF NEW YORK<br />

IN W,: NEW YORK COUNTY<br />

j NYCAL<br />

ASBESTOS LTTlGATJON<br />

i I.A.S. Part 30<br />

j (Heitler, J.)<br />

._I_I-<br />

T’H 1s DOClJMENT REFERS TO:<br />

BETTY BISHOP, ~DIVIDUA1,LY AND<br />

EXECUTRIX FOR THE ESTATE OF ROBERT i<br />

D. BISHOP, SR., NO OPPOSITION<br />

i SUMMARY JUDGMENT<br />

Plaintiffs, j MOTION AND ORDER<br />

-against-<br />

A. C. & S., INC., el al.,<br />

Defendants.<br />

j<br />

WHEREFORE, defendant, Safeguard Industrial Equipment Co., hereby requests<br />

summary judgment in the above entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules 4 3212,<br />

dismissing plaintiffs’ complaint against defendant, Safeguard lndustrial Equipment Co., with<br />

prejudice in this action, and there being no opposition thereto,<br />

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against<br />

defendant, Safeguard Industrial Equipment Co., be and the same are hereby dismissed with<br />

prejudice and without casts.<br />

Dated: New YQrk, New York<br />

Attorney for Defendant<br />

Safeguard Industrial Equipment Co.<br />

MCG~VNEY & KLUGER, P.C.<br />

80 Broad Street-Suite 2300<br />

New York, New York 100<strong>04</strong><br />

(212) 509-3456<br />

Estate of Robert D. Bishop, Sr.<br />

WEITZ & LUXENBERG,<br />

SO ORDERED,<br />

N0<strong>04</strong><strong>04</strong>78-1<br />

APR 15 20<strong>11</strong>


I<br />

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK<br />

COUNTY OF NEW YORK<br />

IN RE: NEW YOU COUNTY<br />

j NYCAL<br />

, ASBESTOS LITIGATION<br />

j I.A.S. Part 30<br />

-.<br />

! (Heitler, J.)<br />

THIS DOCUMENT REFERS TO:<br />

i Index Np%a5<strong>26</strong>8100<br />

BETTY BISHOP, INDIVIDUALLY AND<br />

EXECUTRIX FOR THE ESTATE OF ROBERT j<br />

D. BISHOP, SR.,<br />

i NO OPPOSITION<br />

i SUMMARY JUDGMENT<br />

Plaintiffs, MOTION AND ORDER<br />

-against-<br />

A. C. & S., INC., et al.,<br />

Defendants.<br />

j<br />

WHEREFORJZ, defendant, Tishman Liquidating Cop, hereby requests summary<br />

judgment in the above entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules 5 3212, dismissing<br />

plaintiffs' complaint against defendant, Tishman Liquidating Cop, with prejudice in this action,<br />

and there being no opposition thereto,<br />

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against<br />

defendant, Tishman Liquidating Corp., be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and<br />

without costs.<br />

80 Broad Street-Suite 2300<br />

New Y ork, New Y ork 100<strong>04</strong><br />

(212) 509-3456<br />

SO ORDERED,<br />

Hon. Shew Klein Heitler<br />

WElTZ & LUXENBERG, P.C.<br />

700 Broadway<br />

p ~YW YORK<br />

COUNTY CLERKS OFFICE<br />

2383-22475AR<br />

N0<strong>04</strong><strong>04</strong>78-1


SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK<br />

COUNTY OF NEW YORK<br />

IN RE: NEW YORK CITY ASBESTOS LITIGATION<br />

* NYCAL<br />

BETTY ANN BISHOP, Individually and as Executrix :<br />

Part<br />

for the Estate of ROBERT D. BISHOP SR.,<br />

3o<br />

: (Hon. Sherry Klein Heitler)<br />

Plaintiff(s),<br />

: Index No,: <strong>11</strong>9390-00<br />

A.C. & S., INC., et al.,<br />

-against-<br />

Defendants.<br />

NO-OPPOSITION SUMMARY<br />

: JUDGMENT MOTION AND<br />

: ORDER<br />

WHEREFORE, defendant CRANE CO. hereby requests summary judgment in the<br />

above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 32 12, dismissing<br />

plaintiffs complaint against defendant CRANE CO. with prejudice, and there being no<br />

opposition thereto,<br />

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against<br />

defendant CRANE CO. be, and the same are hereby, dismissed with prejudice and without costs.<br />

Dated: 3 \T a\ \\<br />

rk, New York<br />

-P-l 72<br />

Frank Ortiz, Esq.<br />

WEITZ & LUXENBERG, n.'<br />

Attorneys for Plaintiff(s)<br />

700 Broadway<br />

New York, NY 10003<br />

(212) 558-5500 New York, NY 10022~~<br />

IQj'<br />

-,<br />

Hon. Shf?yMn Heitler


"---"*---->-- ~<br />

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK<br />

COUNTY OF NEW YOKK<br />

IN RE: NEW YORK COUNTY<br />

j NYCAL<br />

ASBESTOS LITIGATION<br />

j I.A.S. Part 30<br />

: (Heitler, J.)<br />

THIS DOCUMENT REFERS TO:<br />

j Index No.: <strong>11</strong>939YOO<br />

GRACE FOWLER, INDIVIDUALLY AND AS !<br />

EXGCU'T'KIX FOR THE ESTATE OF JOHN T. j<br />

FOWLER,<br />

i NO OPPOSITION<br />

j SUMMARY JUDGMENT<br />

Plaintiffs, j MOTION AND ORDER<br />

-against-<br />

A. C. & S., INC., et ai.,<br />

Defendants.<br />

WHEREFORE, defendant, Safeguard Industrial Equipment Co., hereby requests<br />

summary judgment in the above entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules 0 3212,<br />

dismissing plaintiffs' complaint against defendant, Safeguard Industrial Equipment Co., with<br />

prejudice in this action, and there being no opposition thereto,<br />

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against<br />

defendant, Safeguard Industrial Equipment Co., be and the same are hereby dismissed with<br />

prejudice and without costs.<br />

Dated: New Yo&, New York<br />

.b*L<br />

Attorney for Defendant<br />

Safeguard Industrial Equipment<br />

MCGIVNEY & KLUGER, P.C.<br />

SO Broad Street-Suite 2300<br />

New York, New York 100<strong>04</strong><br />

(212) 509-3456<br />

r-c 'cs<br />

Attorney for Plaintiffs<br />

Estate of John T. Fowler<br />

WEITZ & LUXENBERG, P.<br />

York, New York ]@&ha hp~ 2 6 IM'<br />

New 700 Broadway<br />

(212) 558-5500<br />

SO ORDERED,<br />

Won. Sheny Kleinkeitler<br />

N0<strong>04</strong><strong>04</strong>78-1


SIJPREME c:Ic)uKr OF u-iE STATE OF NEW Y ORK<br />

I:OUN'I'Y OF NEW YORK<br />

1N RE: NJ:W YOKK COUN'I'Y<br />

AS €3 f


I__<br />

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK<br />

COUNTY OF NEW YORK<br />

IN RE: NEW YORK COUNTY<br />

j NYCAL<br />

ASBESTOS LITIGATION<br />

i I.A.S. Part 30<br />

d i (Heitler, J.)<br />

THIS DOCUMENT REFERS TO:<br />

Index No.: <strong>11</strong>9393/00<br />

TN RE FOWLER: GRACE FOWLER,<br />

INDIVIDUALLY AND AS EXECUTRIX FOR<br />

THE ESTATE OF JOHN T. FOWLER,<br />

NO OPPOSITION<br />

SUMMARY JUDGMENT<br />

Plaintiff’s, MOTION AND ORDER<br />

---.__I<br />

-against-<br />

A. C. & S., INC., et al.,<br />

- Defendants. j<br />

WHEREFORE, defendant, Treadwell Corporation, hereby requests summary judgment in<br />

the above entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules fj 3212, dismissing plaintiffs’<br />

complaint against defendant, Treadwell Corporation, with prejudice in this action, and there<br />

being no opposition thereto,<br />

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against<br />

defendant, Treadwell Corporation, be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and<br />

without costs.<br />

Dated: New Y rk, New York<br />

49, , 201 1<br />

Attorney for Defendant<br />

Treadwell Corporation<br />

MCGIVNEY & UUGER, P.C.<br />

80 Broad Street-Suite 2300<br />

New York, New York I00<strong>04</strong><br />

(212) 509-3456<br />

SO ORDERED,<br />

Estate of John T. Fowler<br />

WEITZ & LUXENBERG, P.C.<br />

700 Broadway<br />

New York, New York 10003<br />

(212) 558-5500<br />

323&W<br />

~p~3 2 6 20.<strong>11</strong><br />

pjE\N Y GffK<br />

CLERKS OFFICE


-.-I<br />

I<br />

SUPREME COURT OF THE STAI’E OF NEW YORK<br />

COUNTY<br />

~ OF NEW YORK ~<br />

IN RE: NEW YORK COUNTY<br />

! NYCAL<br />

ASBESTOS LlT1C;ATION<br />

--<br />

THlS DOCUMENT FEFERS TO:<br />

DAVID 1. GIANCARLO AND NOREEN K.<br />

GIANCARLO,<br />

-against-<br />

A. C. & S., INC., et al.,<br />

Plaintiffs,<br />

- Defendants. !<br />

j J.A.S. Part 30<br />

i (Heitler, J.)<br />

i Index No.-0725/01<br />

: NO OPPOSITION<br />

! SUMMARY JUDGMENT<br />

j MOTION AND ORDER<br />

WHEREFORE, defendant, Oakfabco, Inc., hereby requests summary judgment in the<br />

above entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules 9 3212, dismissing plaintiffs’<br />

complaint against defendant, Oakfabco, Inc., with prejudice in this action, and there being no<br />

opposition thereto,<br />

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against<br />

defendant, Oakfabco, Inc., be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and without<br />

costs.<br />

Dated: New York, New York<br />

4 I ,20<strong>11</strong><br />

,I*<br />

Robert Darish, Esq.<br />

Attorney for Defendant<br />

Oakfabco, Inc.<br />

MCGIVNEY & KLUGER, P.C.<br />

80 Broad Street-Suite 2300<br />

New York, New York 100<strong>04</strong><br />

(212) 509-3456<br />

SO ORDERED,<br />

r<br />

I L E D<br />

David J: Giancarlo and Noreen K. Giancarlo<br />

WEITZ&LUXENBERG,P.CF<br />

700 Broadway<br />

New Y ork, New Y ork 10003 APR 2 6 20<strong>11</strong><br />

C<br />

N0<strong>04</strong><strong>04</strong>74-1.


SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK<br />

COUNTY OF NEW YORK<br />

IN RE: NEW YORK CITY<br />

ASBESTOS LITIGATION<br />

This Document Relates to:<br />

DAVID J. GIANCARLO and NOREEN K.<br />

GIANCARLO,<br />

I.A.S. Part 30<br />

(Heitler, J.)<br />

INDEX NO.: 00-1 19393<br />

NO OPPOSITION<br />

SUMMARY JUDGMENT<br />

MOTION AND ORDER<br />

against<br />

ACandS, INC., at al.,<br />

WHEREFORE, defendant, Kohler Co., hereby<br />

quests summary judgm nt in th<br />

above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212, dismissing plaintiffs'<br />

complaint against defendant, Kohler Co., with prejudice, and there being no opposition thereto,<br />

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against<br />

defendant, Kohler Co., be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and without costs.<br />

DATED:<br />

New Brunswick, NJ<br />

3 \n \\\<br />

IUNST & DOUKAS, LLP<br />

4ttorneys for Defendant,<br />


"I_______-"<br />

SlJPRHME COUR1' OF THE STATE OF NI?W YORK<br />

COUNTY OF NEW YOKK -<br />

IN RE: NEW YORK COUNTY<br />

j NYCAL<br />

ASBESTOS LITIGATION I.A.S. Part 30<br />

- i (Heitler, J.)<br />

THIS DOCUM-REFEKS TO:<br />

GRACE FOWLER, INDIVIDUALLY AND AS<br />

EXECU'I'RIX FOR 'THE ESTATE OF JOHN T.<br />

FOWLER,<br />

-against-<br />

A. C. & S., JNC., et al.,<br />

Plaintiffs,<br />

Defendants.<br />

j Index No.: <strong>11</strong>9393/00<br />

i<br />

j<br />

NO OPPOSITION<br />

j SUMMARY JUDGMENT<br />

: MOTION AND ORDER<br />

WHEREFORE, defendant, Tishman Liquidating Corp., hereby requests summary<br />

judgment in the above entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules 8 321 2, dismissing<br />

plaintiffs' complaint against defendant, Tishman Liquidating Corp., with prejudice in this action,<br />

and there being no opposition thereto,<br />

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against<br />

defendant, Tishman Liquidating Corp., be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and<br />

without costs.<br />

Dated: New Yo&, New York<br />

MCGJVNEY & KLUGER, P.C.<br />

80 Broad Street-Suite 2300<br />

New York, New Y ork 100<strong>04</strong><br />

(2 12) 509-3456<br />

SO ORDERED,<br />

Estate of John T. Fowler<br />

WEITZ & LUXENBERG. P.C.<br />

700 Broadway<br />

York, New York 10003<br />

APR 2 6 lo''<br />

couNn<br />

2383-22470K<br />

NEW YORK<br />

CLERKS of<br />

N0<strong>04</strong><strong>04</strong>78-1<br />

APR I5 20<strong>11</strong>


SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK<br />

_-_ COUNTY _ _ _ OF . . NEW ~ _ Y_ ON ____.-----<br />

> ~<br />

1N RE: NEW YORK COUNTY<br />

i NYCAL<br />

ASBESTOS LITIGATION<br />

-~~<br />

THIS DOCUMENT REFERS TO:<br />

HARVEY L. FLETTMAN AND VIVIAN M.<br />

FLEI'TMAN,<br />

-against-<br />

A. C. & $., INC., st al.,<br />

Plaintiffs,<br />

Defendants.<br />

i I.A.S. Part 30<br />

! (Heitler, J.)<br />

1 h d e x ~ ~ & 0 5 8 8 / 0 1<br />

i<br />

NO OPPOSITION<br />

i SUMMARY JUDGMENT<br />

MOTION AND ORDER<br />

WHEREFORE, defendant, Treadwell Corporation, hereby requests summary judgment in<br />

the above entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules 8 3212, dismissing plaintiffs'<br />

complaint against defendant, Treadwell Corporation, with prejudice in this action, and there<br />

being no opposition thereto,<br />

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against<br />

defendant, Treadwell Corporation, be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and<br />

without costs.<br />

Dated: New Yo&, New York<br />

-1/ \ , 20<strong>11</strong><br />

.&\4i&LqZz><br />

Carol M. Tempesta, Esq.<br />

Attorney for Defendant<br />

Treadwell Corporation<br />

Harvey L. Fleitman and Vivian M. Fleitman<br />

MCGXVNEY & KLUGER, P.C.<br />

WEITZ & LUXENBERG, P.C.<br />

SO Broad Street-Suite 2300<br />

700 Broadway<br />

New York, New York 100<strong>04</strong><br />

New York, New York 10003<br />

(212) 509-3456 (212) 558-5500<br />

APR 2 6 20<strong>11</strong><br />

SO ORDERED,<br />

Y^<br />

1235-19822<br />

COLlNfl<br />

CLERK'S OFF=<br />

N0<strong>04</strong><strong>04</strong>78-1<br />

APR I5 20<strong>11</strong>


-I-_-<br />

SUPREME COUR'T OF 'THE STATE OF NEW YORK<br />

COUNTY OF NEW YORK<br />

1N RE: NEW YORK COUNTY<br />

! NYCAL<br />

ASBESTOS LITIGATION<br />

; I.A.S. Part 30<br />

i<br />

1<br />

(Ikitler, J.)<br />

THIS DOCUMENT REFERS TO:<br />

Index No&~&00588/01<br />

IIARVEY L. FLEITMAN AND VIVIAN M.<br />

FLEITMAN,<br />

i NO OPPOSITION<br />

Plaintiffs, j SUMMARY JUDGMENT<br />

MOTION AND ORDER<br />

-against-<br />

A. C. & S., INC., et al.,<br />

Defendants.<br />

j<br />

WHEREFORF:, defendant, Oakfabco, Inc., hereby requests summary judgment in the<br />

above entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules 5 3212, dismissing plaintiffs'<br />

complaint against defendant, Oakfabco, Inc,, with prejudice in this action, and there being no<br />

opposition thereto,<br />

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against<br />

defendant, Oakfabco, Inc., be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and without<br />

costs.<br />

Dated: New York, New York<br />

, 201 1<br />

D<br />

Attorney for Defendant<br />

F'[*rx<br />

Oakfabco, Inc.<br />

Harvey L. Fleitman and Vivi<br />

MCGIVNEY & KLUGER, P.C.<br />

WE~TZ & LUXENBERG, P.C.<br />

80 Broad Street-Suite 2300<br />

700 Broadway<br />

New York, New Y ork 100<strong>04</strong><br />

New York, New York 10003<br />

(212) 509-3456 (212) 558-5500 APR 2 6 20<strong>11</strong><br />

SO ORDERED,<br />

NEW YORK<br />

2mt&jI' C W S OFFICE<br />

N0<strong>04</strong><strong>04</strong>74-1


.-_ I .-I_.-<br />

ASBESTOS 1,ITlGATION<br />

I<br />

DOCUMENT JXEFERS TO:<br />

THIS<br />

-_d<br />

HARVEY L. FLEITMAN AND VIVIAN M.<br />

FLEITMAN,<br />

-against-<br />

A. C. & S., INC., et al.,<br />

-__---<br />

j 1.A.S. Part 30<br />

i (fkitler, J.)<br />

Index ~ ~ 0 0 5 8 * , 0 I<br />

[ NO OYPOSITlON<br />

Plaintiffs, I SUMMARY JUDGMENT<br />

\ MOTION AND ORJlER<br />

Defendants. -- i<br />

WHEWFORE, defendant, Safeguard Industrial Equipment Co., hereby requests<br />

summary judgment in the above entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules 5 3212,<br />

dismissing plaintiffs' complaint against defendant, Safeguard Industrial Equipment Co., with<br />

prejudice in this action, and there being no opposition thereto,<br />

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against<br />

defendant, Safeguard Industrial Equipment Co., be and the same are hereby dismissed with<br />

prejudice and without costs.<br />

irea: i ~tw<br />

NeW Y OTK<br />

torney for Defendant<br />

feguard Industrial Equipment<br />

MCGIVNEY & KLUGER, P.C.<br />

Harvey L. Fleitrnan and Vivian M. Fleitman<br />

WHTZ & LUXENBERG, P.C.<br />

SO Broad Street-Suite 2300 700 Broadway e rb '><br />

New York, New York 100<strong>04</strong><br />

(212) 509-3456<br />

New York, New York 1<br />

(212) 558-5500<br />

N0<strong>04</strong><strong>04</strong>78-1


SIJPREME COURT OF ’THE STATE OF NEW YORK<br />

COUNTY OF NEW YORK<br />

INET’NIiW YORK COUNTY<br />

! NYCAL<br />

ASBESTOS LITIGATION j I.A.S. Part 30<br />

-- -<br />

! (Heitler, J.)<br />

THIS DOCUME~EFERS TO:<br />

JOSE F. FERNANDEZ AND ARLENE<br />

FERNANDEZ,<br />

[ NO OPPOSITION<br />

Plaintiffs, i SUMMARY JUDGMENT<br />

\ MOTION AND 0RI)ER<br />

-against-<br />

A. C. & S., INC., etal.,<br />

_ - . ~<br />

Defendants.<br />

i<br />

WHEREFORE, defendant, Courter & Company, Inc., hereby requests summary<br />

judgment in the above entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules 0 32 12, dismissing<br />

plaintiffs’ complaint against defendant, Courter & Company, Inc., with prejudice in this action,<br />

and there being no opposition thereto,<br />

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against<br />

defendant, Courter & Company, Inc., be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and<br />

without costs.<br />

Courter & Company, Inc.<br />

Jose F. Fernandez and Arlene Fernandez<br />

MCGIWY & KLUGER, P.C.<br />

WEITZ & LUXENBERG, P.C.<br />

80 Broad Street-Suite 2300<br />

700 Broadway<br />

New York. New York 100<strong>04</strong><br />

New York, New York 1000<br />

(212) 509-3456 (2 12) 558-5500<br />

SO ORDERED,<br />

Hon. Sherry Klein?Heftler<br />

---_._<br />

N0<strong>04</strong><strong>04</strong>78-1


-_----__I<br />

~~ ____.__I.-___<br />

_ _ ~ . I --A ”<br />

SZJI’KI7,Mk COUR‘I’ OF TJJE STATE OF NEW YORK<br />

COUNTY OF NEW YORK<br />

JN RE: NEW YORK cou;”\Jm<br />

LI_^<br />

! NYCAL<br />

ASHESTOS I,ITIGATION<br />

THlS DOCUMENT REFERS TO:<br />

JOSE F. FERNANDEZ AND ARLENE<br />

FERNANDEZ,<br />

-against-<br />

A. C. & S., @-IC., et ul.,<br />

; I.A.S. Part 30<br />

I (Heitler, J.)<br />

i Index N o m I 00621 l0 1<br />

i NO OPPOSITION<br />

Plaintiffs, i SUMMARY JUDGMENT<br />

\ MOTION AND ORDER<br />

Defendants. - i<br />

I<br />

WHEREFORE, defendant, Patterson Pump Co., hereby requests summary judgment in<br />

the above entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules 9 3212, dismissing plaintiffs’<br />

complaint against defendant, Patterson Pump Co., with prejudice in this action, and there being<br />

no opposition thereto,<br />

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against<br />

defendant, Patterson Pump Co., be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and without<br />

costs.<br />

Patterson Pump Co.<br />

Jose F. Fernandez and Arlene Fernandez<br />

MCG~VNEY & KLUGER, P.C.<br />

WE~TZ & LUXENBERG, P.C.<br />

80 Broad Street-Suite 2300<br />

700 Broadway<br />

New York, New York 100<strong>04</strong><br />

New York, New York loop<br />

(2 12) 509-3456<br />

Y<br />

(212) 558-5500<br />

SO ORDERED,<br />

Hon. Sherry Klein Heitler<br />

E’D<br />

/$pR it 6 le‘‘<br />

N0<strong>04</strong><strong>04</strong>78- I<br />

APR 15 20<strong>11</strong><br />

i<br />

I


SlJPKEME COURT OF ?'HE STATE OF NEW YORK<br />

COUNTY OF NEW _-_-<br />

IN RE NEW YOM corm-ry-<br />

~ YORK<br />

_.Ij<br />

NYCAL<br />

ASBESTOS LITIGATION<br />

j I.A.S. Part 30<br />

THIS DOCUMEN'I' REFERS TO:<br />

HARVEY L. FLEITMAN AND VIVIAN M.<br />

FLEITMAN,<br />

\ NO OPPOSITION<br />

Plaintiffs, i SUMMARY JUDGMENT<br />

i MOTION AND ORDER<br />

-against-<br />

A. C. & S., INC., et al.,<br />

Defendants.<br />

i<br />

WHEREFORE, defendant, Courter & Company, Inc., hereby requests summary<br />

judgment in the above entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules 5 3212, dismissing<br />

plaintiffs' complaint against defendant, Courter & Company, Inc., with prejudice in this action,<br />

and there being no opposition thereto,<br />

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against<br />

defendant, Courter & Company, Inc., be and the sme are hereby dismissed with prejudice and<br />

without costs.<br />

Attorney for Defendant<br />

Courter & Company, Inc.<br />

MCGlVNEY & KLUGER, P.C.<br />

80 Broad Street-Suite 2300<br />

WEITZ & LUXENBERG, P.C.<br />

700 Broadway<br />

New York, New York 100<strong>04</strong> New York, New York 10003<br />

(212) 509-3456 s 2 ) 558-5500<br />

SO ORDERED,<br />

Hon. Sherry Klein Heitler


SUPREME COURT OF THE S'I'ATE OFNEW YORK<br />

comv -- OF NEW YORK<br />

1N RE: NEW YORK COUNT<br />

: NYCAL<br />

ASBESTOS LITIGA'I'JON<br />

j I.A.S. Part 30<br />

! (Heitler, J.)<br />

THIS DOCUMENT REFERS E:<br />

a<br />

j XndexN .: <strong>11</strong>9394/0 005W01<br />

HARVEY L. FLEJTMAN AND VIVJAN M.<br />

FLEITMAN ,<br />

i NO OPPOSITION<br />

Plaintiffs, j SUMMARY JUDGMENT<br />

/ MOTION AND ORDER<br />

-against-<br />

A. C. & S., INC., et al., I<br />

Defendants.<br />

j<br />

WMEREFORE, defendant, Tishman Liquidating Corp., hereby requests summary<br />

judgment in the above entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules 4 3212, dismissing<br />

i<br />

plaintiffs' complaint against defendant, lishman Liquidating Corp., with prejudice in this action,<br />

and there being no opposition thereto,<br />

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against<br />

defendant, Tishman Liquidating Corp., be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and<br />

without costs.<br />

I<br />

MCGIVNEY & KLUGER, P.C.<br />

WEITZ & LUXENBERG, P.C.<br />

80 Broad Street-Suite 2300<br />

700 Broadway<br />

New Yak, New York 100<strong>04</strong><br />

New York, New York 10003<br />

(212) 509-3456 (212) 558-5500<br />

SO ORDERED,<br />

2383-22468U<br />

N0<strong>04</strong><strong>04</strong>78-1


SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK<br />

COUNTY OF NEW YORK<br />

1N RE: NEW YORK COUNTY<br />

! NYCAL<br />

ASBESTOS LITlGATlON<br />

j I.A.S. Part 30<br />

i (Heitler, J.)<br />

THIS DOCUMENT REFERS TO:<br />

JOSE F. FERNANDEZ AND ARLENE<br />

FERNANDEZ,<br />

-against-<br />

P1 aint i ffs,<br />

! NO OPPOSITION<br />

i SUMMARY JUDGMENT<br />

1 MOTION AND OIRXIER<br />

A. C. & S., INC., etal.,<br />

Defendants.<br />

j<br />

WHEREFORE, defendant, Treadwell Corporation, hereby requests summary ddgment --I<br />

the above entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules 6 3212, dismissing plaintiffs'<br />

complaint against defendant, Treadwell Corporation, with prejudice in this action, and there<br />

being no opposition thereto,<br />

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against<br />

defendant, Treadwell Corporation, be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and<br />

without costs.<br />

Attorney for Defendant<br />

Treadwell Corporation<br />

MCGIW,Y & UUGER, P.C.<br />

80 Broad Street-Suite 2300<br />

700 Broadway<br />

New York. New York 100<strong>04</strong><br />

New York. New York 10003<br />

(212) 509-3456 (212) 558-5500 APR 2 6 20<strong>11</strong><br />

SO ORDERED,<br />

*<br />

NEW YC13K<br />

1ewBBTy CLERKS OFFICE<br />

N0<strong>04</strong><strong>04</strong>78-1


SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK<br />

COUNTY OF NEW YORK<br />

IN RE: NEW YORK CITY<br />

ASBESTOS LIT1 GAT1 ON<br />

This Document Relates to:<br />

MARSHA A. KESSLER, Executrix For the Estate of<br />

TERRY M. KESSLER, and MARSHA A. KESSLER,<br />

Individually,<br />

I.A.S. Part 30<br />

(Heitler, J.)<br />

INDEX NO.: 00-1 19400<br />

NO OPPOSITION<br />

SUMMARY JUDGMENT<br />

MOTION AND ORDER<br />

against<br />

ACandS, INC., et at.,<br />

WHEREFORE, defendant, Kohler Co., hereby requests summary judgment in the<br />

above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212, dismissing plaintiffs'<br />

complaint against defendant, Kohler Co., with prejudice, and there being no opposition thereto,<br />

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against<br />

lefendant, Kohler Co., be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and without costs.<br />

DATED:<br />

New Brunswick, NJ<br />

IUNST &I DOUKAS, LLP<br />

4ttorneys for Defendant,<br />

{ohler Co.<br />

10 Paterson Street - PO Box 480<br />

qew Brunswick, New Jersey 08903<br />

Marsha A. Kessler, Executrix for the Estate of<br />

Terry M. Kessler, and Marsha A. Kessler,<br />

Individually<br />

700 Broadway<br />

HOAGLAND, LONQO<br />

MORAN. DUNST 8<br />

DOUKAS. LLP<br />

ATTORNEYS AT LAW<br />

NORTH JERSEY<br />

40 PATERSON ST<br />

PO BOX 480<br />

NNVBRUNSWICK. NJ<br />

$0 ORDERED:<br />

SOUTH JERSEY<br />

701 WLTSEY'S MILL RD<br />

SUITE 202<br />

HAMMONTON, NJ<br />

APR 2 6 20<strong>11</strong>


SI-JPREME COURT OF ‘THE STATE OF NEW YORK<br />

--- COUNTY OF NEW YORK<br />

IN RE: NEW YOFEc6N?Y<br />

j NYCAL<br />

ASBESTOS LITIGATION i I.A.S. Pa1 30<br />

! (Heitler, J.)<br />

THIS DOCUMENT REFERS pro:<br />

TERRY M. KESSLER AND MARSHA<br />

KESSLER,<br />

-against-<br />

PI ainti ffs, j NO OPPOSITION<br />

[ SUMMARY JUDGMENT<br />

! MOTION AND ORDER<br />

A. C. & S., INC., et al.,<br />

Defendants.<br />

j<br />

WHEREFORE, defendant, Tishman Liquidating Corp., hereby requests summary<br />

judgment in the above entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules 5 3212, dismissing<br />

plaintiffs’ complaint against defendant, Tishman Liquidating Corp., with prejudice in this action,<br />

and there being no opposition thereto,<br />

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against<br />

defendant, Tishman Liquidating Corp., be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and<br />

without costs.<br />

Tishman Liquidating Corp.<br />

MCGIVNEY & KLUGER, P.C.<br />

80 Broad Street-Suite 2300<br />

New York, New York IO<br />

(212) 509-3456<br />

SO ORDERED,<br />

WElTZ & LUXENBERG, P.C.<br />

700 Broadway<br />

&RJ 2 6 2Q1?<br />

EW YORK<br />

kERKS OFFICE<br />

N0<strong>04</strong><strong>04</strong>78-1


SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YON<br />

COUNTY OF NEW YOKK<br />

IN E,: NEW YOK COUN‘I’Y<br />

: NYCAL<br />

ASBES’I’OS LITIGATION<br />

i I.A.S. Part 30<br />

i (Heitler, J.)<br />

THIS DOCUMENT REFERS TO:<br />

-^-_I-<br />

TERRY M. KESSLER AND MARSHA<br />

KESSLER,<br />

A. C. & S., INC., et al.,<br />

Index N ofiZGa0 1 89210 1,<br />

100787/03<br />

Plaintiffs, j NO OPPOSITION<br />

: SUMMARY JUDGMENT<br />

-against- i MOTION ANI) ORDER<br />

- Defendants. i<br />

WHEREFORE, defendant, Treadwell Corporation, hereby requests summary judgment in<br />

the above entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules 4 3212, dismissing plaintiffs’<br />

complaint against defendant, Treadwell Corporation, with prejudice in this action, and there<br />

being no opposition thereto,<br />

ORDEED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against<br />

defendant, Treadwell Corporation, be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and<br />

without costs.<br />

Dated: New York, New York<br />

Carol M. Tempesta, Esq.<br />

Attorney far Defendant<br />

Treadwell Corporation<br />

MCGIVNEY & UUGER, P.C.<br />

80 Broad Street-Suite 2300<br />

New York, New York 100<strong>04</strong><br />

700 Broadway<br />

New York, New York 10003<br />

(212) 509-3456 (212) 558-5500<br />

-.<br />

SO ORDERED,<br />

Hon. S%<br />

KXek Heitler


S~JPKEME couii'r 01: m~ STATE OF NEW YORK<br />

- C'OIJNTY ----. OF NEW YORK -_- -_--<br />

1N RE: NEW YOKK COUNTY i NYCAL<br />

ASBESTOS LI'I'IGATION<br />

i I.A.S. Part 30<br />

\ (Heitler, J.><br />

THIS DOCUMENT REFERS TO:<br />

TERRY M. KESSLER AND MARSHA<br />

KESSLEK,<br />

100787/03<br />

-against -<br />

Plaintiffs, j NO OPPOSITION<br />

i SUMMARY JUDGMENT<br />

i MOTION AND ORDER<br />

A. C. & S., INC., etal.,<br />

Defendants.<br />

j<br />

W€IEREFORE, defendant, Safeguard Industrial Equipment Co., hereby requests<br />

summary judgment in the above entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules 4 3212,<br />

dismissing plaintiffs' complaint against defendant, Safeguard Industrial Equipment Co., with<br />

prejudice in this action, and there being no opposition thereto,<br />

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against<br />

defendant, Safeguard lndustrial Equipment Co., be and the same are hereby dismissed with<br />

prejudice and without costs.<br />

Attornev for Defend<br />

Safeguard Industrial Equipment Co.<br />

Carl Kroget and Carol Ann Kroger<br />

MCGIVNEY & KLUGER, P.C.<br />

WEITZ & LUXENBERG, P.<br />

FILED<br />

80 Broad Street-Suite 2300<br />

700 Broadway<br />

New York, New York 100<strong>04</strong> New York, New York 100 3<br />

(212) 509-3456<br />

12) 558-5500<br />

SO ORDERED, __<br />

-<br />

Hon. Sherry Klein Heitler<br />

APR 2 6 20<strong>11</strong><br />

N0<strong>04</strong><strong>04</strong>78-1


SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK<br />

COUNTY OF NEW YORK<br />

In Re: NEW YORK CITYASBESTOS LITIGATION<br />

Index No.: 120329/00<br />

DONALD VER HAGUE,<br />

- against -<br />

Plaintiff(s),<br />

NO OPPOSITION<br />

SUMMARY JUDGMENT<br />

MOTION<br />

AC and S, INC., (ARMSGTRONG<br />

CONTRACTING & SUPPLY) et al.,<br />

Defendants.<br />

WHEREFORE, Defendant ?VEIL-MCLAIN COMPANY, INC., hereinafter (“WEJL-<br />

MCLAIN”) hereby requests Summary Judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil<br />

Practice Law and Rules Section 321 2, dismissing plaintiff’s complaint against Defendant Weil-<br />

McLain with prejudice, and there being no opposition thereto,<br />

i<br />

I<br />

I<br />

I<br />

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against<br />

Defendant, Weil-McLain be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and without costs<br />

to either party.<br />

Dated: ,20<strong>11</strong><br />

Frank Ortiz, Esq.<br />

Attorneys for Plaintiff<br />

700 Broadway<br />

New York, NY 10003<br />

(212) 558-5500<br />

SO ORDERED,<br />

SEGAL McCAMBRIDGE<br />

SINGER & MAHONEY, LTD.<br />

Attorneys for Defendant<br />

Weil McLain<br />

850 Third Avenue, Suite <strong>11</strong>00<br />

FILED<br />

APR 2 6 201t<br />

NLUV YLIRK<br />

COUNTY CLERKS 0-<br />

15 20<strong>11</strong>


SlJYKEME COIJRI' OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK<br />

-COUNTY - . ~ - OF NEW YORK .-<br />

IN RE: NEW YORK COUNTY-<br />

\ NYCAL<br />

ASBESTOS LI'I'IGATION<br />

j I.A.S. Part 30<br />

i (Heitler, 3.)<br />

- I I . . ~ - -- ~<br />

THIS DOCTJMENT REFERS TO:<br />

j Index No.: 12<strong>11</strong>97/00<br />

BEVER1,Y J. BENNETT, PERSONAL<br />

REPRESENTATIVE FOR THE ESTATE OF<br />

RICHARD FLOYD BENNETT AND BEVERLY \ NO OPPOSITION<br />

.I. BENNETT, INDlVIDUALLY,<br />

! SUMMARY JUDGMENT<br />

i MOTION AND ORDER<br />

Plaintiffs,<br />

-against-<br />

A. C. & S., INC.? et al.,<br />

Defendants. !<br />

WHEREFORE, defendant, Ti shman Liquidating Corp., hereby requests summary<br />

judgment in the above entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules 6 3212, dismissing<br />

plaintiffs' complaint against defendant, Tishman Liquidating Corp., with prejudice in this action,<br />

and there being no opposition thereto,<br />

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against<br />

defendant, Tishman Liquidating Corp., be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and<br />

without costs.<br />

MCGIVNEY & KLUGER, P.C.<br />

80 Broad Street-Suite 2300<br />

New York, New York 100<strong>04</strong><br />

(212) 509-3456<br />

SO ORDERED,<br />

N0<strong>04</strong><strong>04</strong>78-1<br />

Estate of Richard Floyd Bennett<br />

WEITZ & LUXENBERG, P.C.<br />

700 Broadway<br />

New York, New York 10003<br />

2383-4147<br />

p y :PI1<br />

I


SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK<br />

COUNTY OF NEW YORK<br />

IN RE: NEWFORK COUNTY<br />

! NYCAL<br />

ASBESTOS LITIGATION<br />

j I.A.S. Part 30<br />

j (Heitler, J.><br />

-<br />

THIS DOCUMENT REFEKS ~ 6:<br />

BEVERLY J. BENNETT, PERSONAL<br />

REPRESENTATIVE FOR THE ESTATE OF<br />

RICHAm FLOYD BENNETT AND BEVERLY<br />

J. BENNETT, INDIVIDUALLY,<br />

Plaintiffs,<br />

i Index No.: 12<strong>11</strong>97/00<br />

NO OPPOSITION<br />

j SUMMARY JUDGMENT<br />

i MOTION AND ORJIEK<br />

-against-<br />

A. C. & S., INC., et a).,<br />

Defendants.<br />

i<br />

WHEREFORE, defendant, Courter & Company, Inc., hereby requests summary<br />

judgment in the above entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules 5 3212, dismissing<br />

plaintiffs' complaint against defendant, Courter & Company, Inc., with prejudice in this action,<br />

and there being no opposition thereto,<br />

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against<br />

defendant, Courter & Company, Inc., be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and<br />

without costs.<br />

Attorney for Defendant<br />

Courter & Company, 1nc.<br />

MCG~VNEY & KLUGER, P.C.<br />

80 Broad Street-Suite 2300<br />

New York. New York 100<strong>04</strong><br />

Estate of Richard Floyd Benne<br />

WElTZ & LUXENBERG, P.C.<br />

700 Broadway<br />

New Y ork. New York 10003<br />

N0<strong>04</strong><strong>04</strong>78-1


~ - I .<br />

I .I-<br />

SUPKEME C:OURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YON<br />

-_- COUNTY OF NEW YORK<br />

.-<br />

1N RE: NEW YOKK COUNTY<br />

i NYCAL<br />

ASBESTOS LlTlGATION<br />

I.A.S. Part 30<br />

(Heitler, J .)<br />

THIS DOCUMENT REFERS TO:<br />

Index No.: 121 '197/00<br />

BEVERLY J. BENNETT, PERSONAL<br />

REPRESENTATIVE FOR THE ESTATE OF<br />

RJCHARD FIBYD BENNETT AND BEVERLY NO OPPOSITION<br />

J . BENNETT, INDIVIDUALLY,<br />

SUMMARY JUDGMENT<br />

MOTION AND ORDER<br />

Plaintiffs,<br />

-against-<br />

A. C. & S., INC., et al.,<br />

--<br />

Defendants.<br />

WHEREFORE, defendant, Treadwell Corporation, hereby requests summary judgment in<br />

the above entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules 5 3212, dismissing plaintiffs'<br />

complaint against defendant, Treadwell Corporation, with prejudice in this action, and there<br />

being no opposition thereto,<br />

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against<br />

defendant, Treadwell Corporation, be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and<br />

without costs.<br />

Dated: New Y rk, New York<br />

4 ?, ,20<strong>11</strong><br />

L d I i Q ,-%<br />

Carol M. Tempesta, hsq.<br />

Attorney for Defendant<br />

Treadwell Corporation<br />

Estate of Richard Floyd Bennett<br />

MCGNNEY & KLUGER, P.C.<br />

WEITZ & LUXENBERG, P.C.<br />

80 Broad Street-Suite 2300 700 Broadway APK 2 %0<strong>11</strong><br />

New York, New York 100<strong>04</strong><br />

ew York 10003<br />

(212) 509-3456 00 NCUir" "'OHki<br />

SO ORDERED,<br />

COUN~ CLERK'S OFFICE<br />

1235-8763<br />

N0<strong>04</strong><strong>04</strong>78-1<br />

APR 15 20<strong>11</strong>


SUPREME COURT OF TIHE STATE OF NEW YORK<br />

ASBESTOS LITIGATION i I.A.S. Part 30<br />

! (Heitler, 1.)<br />

THIS DOCGMENT REFERS TO:<br />

j Index No. 1 12<strong>11</strong>97/00<br />

BEVERLY J. BENNETT, PERSONAL<br />

KEPRESENTATIVE FOR THE ESTATE OF<br />

RICHARD FLOYD BENNETT AND BEVERLY NO OPPOSITION<br />

J. BENNETT, INDIVIDUALLY,<br />

t SUMMARY JUDGMENT<br />

i MOTlON AND ORDER<br />

Plaintiffs,<br />

- -d<br />

-against-<br />

A. C. & S., INC., et al.,<br />

Defendants.<br />

WHEREFORE, defendant, Safeguard Industrial Equipment Co., hereby requests<br />

summary judgment in the above entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules 5 3212,<br />

dismissing plaintiffs’ complaint against defendant, Safeguard Industrial Equipment Co., with<br />

prejudice in this action, and there being no opposition thereto,<br />

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against<br />

defendant, Safeguard Industrial Equipment Go., be and the same are hereby dismissed with<br />

prejudice and without costs.<br />

Dated: New Yojk, New York<br />

I*.<br />

Attorney for Defendant Attorney for Plaintiffs -. “3 -7-<br />

Safeguard Industrial Equipment Co.<br />

MCGIVNEY & KLUGER, P.C.<br />

Estate of Richard Floy&\e~<br />

WElTZ & LUXENBERG, P.C.<br />

80 Broad Street-Suite 2300 700 Broadway p~ 2 6<br />

New York, New York 100<strong>04</strong><br />

ew Y ork 1 OOd<br />

(212) 509-3456 00<br />

SO ORDERED,<br />

324-5613<br />

N0<strong>04</strong><strong>04</strong>78-1


CHARLES 1. HENRY and MARILYN HENRY,<br />

-against-<br />

Plaintiffs,<br />

NYCAL<br />

I.A.S. Part 30<br />

Hon. Sherry Klein Heitler, J.S.C.<br />

Index No.: r??<br />

21309-200<br />

NO OPPOSITION SUMMARY JUDGMENT<br />

MOTION AND ORDER<br />

A.C. &S. INC., et al. including,<br />

FOSTER WHEELER CORPORATION,<br />

WHEREFORE, defendant FOSTER WHEELER, L.L.C. (sued herein as "FOSTER WHEELER<br />

CORPORATION") hereby request summary judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil<br />

Practice Law and Rules Section 3212, dismissing plaintiffs' complaint against defendant FOSTER<br />

WHEELER, L.L.C. with prejudice, and there being no opposition thereto,<br />

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against defendant<br />

FOSTER WHEELER, L.L.C. be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and without costs.<br />

Weitz & Luxenberg, P.C.<br />

Attorney for Plain tvfs<br />

700 Broadway<br />

New York, New York 10003<br />

Attorneys for Foster Wheeler, L. L.C.<br />

Three Gateway Center, 12fh Floor<br />

Newark, NJ 07102<br />

SO ORDERED,<br />

APR 2 6 20<strong>11</strong><br />

NEW YORK<br />

COUNTY CLERKS OFFICE'<br />

NJ<strong>04</strong>1752vl


I_<br />

I<br />

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK<br />

COUNTY OF NEW YORK<br />

IN RE: NEW YORK COUNTY<br />

i NYCAL<br />

ASBESTOS LITIGATION<br />

I I.A.S. Part 30<br />

i (Heitler, J.)<br />

THIS DOCUMENT REFERS TO:<br />

Index No.: 121686/00<br />

ANTONINO SCLAFANI AND ROSARIA<br />

SCLAFANI,<br />

NO OPPOSITION<br />

Plaintiffs, SUMMARY JUDGMENT<br />

MOTION AND ORDER<br />

-against-<br />

--<br />

A. C. & S., INC, et al.,<br />

Defendants.<br />

i<br />

WHEREFORE, defendant, Safeguard Industrial Equipment eo., hereby requests<br />

summary judgment in the above entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules 6 3212,<br />

dismissing plaintiffs' complaint against defendant, Safeguard Industrial Equipment Co,, with<br />

prejudice in this action, and there being no opposition thereta,<br />

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against<br />

defendant, Safeguard Industrial Equipment Co,, be and the same are herepd<br />

px"<br />

prejudice and without costs.<br />

b p 2 ~ 6 201'<br />

Dated: New Yo k, New York<br />

Jfl ,20<strong>11</strong><br />

/ ---<br />

Safeguard Industrial Equipment Co.<br />

MCGIVNEY & KLUGER, P.C.<br />

80 Broad Street-Suite 2300<br />

New York, New York 100<strong>04</strong><br />

(212) 509-3456<br />

Attorney for Plaintiffs<br />

Antonino Sclafani and Rosaria Sclafani<br />

WEIT2 & LUXENBERG, P.C.<br />

700 Broadway<br />

New York, New York 10003<br />

SO ORDERED,<br />

Hon.hhikry Klein Heitler 324-5782<br />

N0<strong>04</strong><strong>04</strong>78-1


SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK<br />

COUNTY OF NEW YORK<br />

IN RE: NEi"Y5RK COUNTY i NYCAL<br />

ASBESTOS LITIGATION<br />

j X.A.S. Part 30<br />

---- [ (Heitlcr, J.)<br />

THIS DOCUMENT KEFERS TO:<br />

i Index No.: 121686/00<br />

ANTONINO SCLAFANI AND ROSAKIA<br />

SCLAFANI,<br />

/ NO OPPOSITION<br />

-against-<br />

A, (:. & S., INC., et ul.,<br />

Plaintiffs,<br />

! SUMMARY JUDGMENT<br />

MOTION AND ORDER<br />

i<br />

Defendants.<br />

j<br />

WHEREFORE, defendant, Treadwell Corporation, hereby requests summary judgment in<br />

the above entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules tj 3212, dismissing plaintiffs'<br />

complaint against defendant, Treadwell Corporation, with prejudice in this action, and there<br />

being no opposition thereto,<br />

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against<br />

defendant, Treadwell Corporation, be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and<br />

without costs.<br />

Dated: New Yo k, New York<br />

.(! ,20<strong>11</strong><br />

\<br />

Michele J. Mittleman, Esq.<br />

Attorney for Defendant<br />

Treadwell Corporation<br />

MCGIWY & KLUGER, P.C.<br />

SO Broad Street-Suite 2300<br />

New Yoxk, New York 100<strong>04</strong><br />

(212) 509-3456<br />

SO ORDERED,<br />

Antonino Sclafani and Rosaria Sclafani<br />

W~rrz & LUXENBERG, P.C.<br />

700 Broadway<br />

New York, New York 10003<br />

APR 2 6 '"'<br />

YUBK<br />

12351052 c~~nKs<br />

COUNfl<br />

N0<strong>04</strong><strong>04</strong>7X-I


SUPREME COURT OF THE STATJ: OF NEW YORK<br />

-_ COUNTY OF NEW YORK<br />

IN RE: NEWYXK COUNTY<br />

i NYCAL<br />

ASBESTOS LITIGATION<br />

j I.A.S. Part 30<br />

I<br />

i (Heitler, J.)<br />

THIS DOCUMENT REFERS TO:<br />

j Index No.: 122053/00<br />

SUZANNE MCINERNEY, INDIVIDUALLY<br />

AND AS EXECUTRIX FOR THE ESTATE OF<br />

I<br />

JOSEPH JOHN MCINERNEY,<br />

i NO OPPOSITION<br />

i SUMMARY JUDGMENT<br />

Plaintiffs, i MOTION AND ORDER<br />

-against-<br />

A. C:. & S., INC., et al.,<br />

--<br />

Defendants.<br />

WHEREFORE, defendant, Oakfabco, Inc., hereby requests summary judgment in the<br />

above entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules 8 3212, dismissing plaintiffs’<br />

complaint against defendant, Oakfabco, lnc., with prejudice in this action, and there being no<br />

opposition thereto,<br />

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against<br />

defendant, Oakfabco, Inc., be and the same are hereby dismissed with<br />

costs.<br />

Dated: New York, New York<br />

Robert P ,\ 3<br />

)JfOll<br />

Darish, Esq.<br />

Attorney for Defendant<br />

Oakfabco, Inc.<br />

MCGIVNEY & UUGER, P.C.<br />

80 Broad Street-Suite 2300<br />

New York, New York 100<strong>04</strong><br />

(212) 509-3456<br />

Estate if Joseph John McInerney<br />

WEITZ & LUXENBERG, P.C.<br />

700 Broadway<br />

New York, New York 10003<br />

SO ORDERED,<br />

2571 -755<br />

N0<strong>04</strong><strong>04</strong>74- I


"-_I_-<br />

I<br />

I<br />

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK<br />

COUNTY OF NEW YORK<br />

IN RE: NEW YORK COUNTY<br />

j NYCAT,<br />

ASBESTOS LI'TIGA'ITION i I.A.S. Part 30<br />

-<br />

i (Heitler, J.)<br />

-,<br />

THIS DOCUMENT REFERS TO-?<br />

i Index No.: 122053/00<br />

SUZANNE MCINERNEY? INDIVIDUALLY<br />

i<br />

AND AS EXECUTRIX FOR 'THE ESTATE OF i<br />

JOSEPH JOHN MCINERNEY,<br />

! NO OPPOSITION<br />

j SUMMARY JUDGMENT<br />

Plaintiffs, MOTION AND ORDER<br />

-against-<br />

A. C. & S., INC., et al.,<br />

Defendants.<br />

i<br />

WHEREFORE, defendant, Treadwell Corporation, hereby requests summary judgment in<br />

the above entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules 0 3212, dismissing plaintiffs'<br />

complaint against defendant, Treadwell Corporation, with prejudice in this action, and there<br />

being no opposition thereto,<br />

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against<br />

defendant, Treadwell Corporation, be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and<br />

without costs.<br />

Dated: New Yprk, New York<br />

A<br />

Carol M. Tempesta, Esq:<br />

Attorney for Defendant<br />

Treadwell Corporation<br />

MCGNNEY & KLUGER, P.C.<br />

80 Broad Street-Suite 2300<br />

WEITZ & LUXENBERG, P.C.<br />

700 Broadway APR 2 6 20<strong>11</strong><br />

New York, New York 100<strong>04</strong><br />

New York, New York 10003<br />

(212) 509-3456<br />

(212) 558-5500<br />

SO ORDERED,<br />

D<br />

NEW YOKK<br />

COUNTY CLERKS OFFICE<br />

1235-21397


I<br />

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK<br />

". comn OF NEW YORK -<br />

IN RE: NEW YORK COUNTY<br />

! NYCAL<br />

ASBESTOS LlTlGATION<br />

i I.A.S. Part 30<br />

(Heitler, J.)<br />

THIS DOCUMENT REFERS TO:<br />

Index No.: 122496/00<br />

PATRICIA A. RUSSELL, INDIVIDUALLY AND<br />

AS ADMINISTRATRIX FOR THE ESTATE OF<br />

THOMAS E. RUSSELL,<br />

NO OPPOSITION<br />

SUMMARY JUDGMENT<br />

Plaintiffs, MOTION AND ORDER<br />

-against-<br />

A. C. & S., INC., et ai.,<br />

Defendants.<br />

i<br />

WHEREFORE, defendant, Treadwell Corporation, hereby requests summary judgment in<br />

the above entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules 5 3212, dismissing plaintiffs'<br />

complaint against defendant, Treadwell Corporation, with prejudice in this action, and there<br />

being no opposition thereto,<br />

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against<br />

defendant, Treadwell Corporation, be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and<br />

without costs.<br />

Dated: New York, New York<br />

4<strong>11</strong> ,201 1<br />

P-P-FJLf&<br />

Carol M. Ternpesta, Esq.<br />

Attorney for Defendant<br />

Treadwell Corporation<br />

MCGIVNEY & KIJGER, P.C.<br />

80 Broad Street-Suite 2300 700 Broadway<br />

New York, New York 100<strong>04</strong> NewYork,NewYork10003 APR 6 2031<br />

(212) 509-3456<br />

SO ORDERED,<br />

GW-%V4<br />

I*dfW YORK<br />

CLERKS OFFIE


~ IN<br />

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK<br />

comw OF NEW YORK<br />

RE: NEW YORK COUNTY i NYCAL<br />

ASBESTOS LITIGATION<br />

i I.A.S. Part 30<br />

i (Heitler, J.)<br />

THIS DOCUMENT REFERS TO:<br />

Index No.: 122496/00<br />

PATRICIA A. RUSSELL, INDIVIDUALLY AND<br />

AS ADMINISTRATRIX FOR THE ESTATE OF<br />

THOMAS E. RUSSELL,<br />

i NO OPPOSITION<br />

i SUMMARY JUDGMENT<br />

Plaintiffs,<br />

j MOTION AND ORDER<br />

-against -<br />

A. C. & S., NC., et al.,<br />

Defendants.<br />

j<br />

WHEREFORE, defendant, Safeguard Industrial Equipment Co., hereby requests<br />

summary judgment in the above entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules (5 3212,<br />

dismissing plaintiffs' complaint against defendant, Safeguard Industrial Equipment Co., with<br />

prejudice in this action, and there being no opposition thereto,<br />

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against<br />

defendant, Safeguard Industrial Equipment Co., be and the same are hereby dismissed with<br />

prejudice and without costs.<br />

p""<br />

h- &z, k$.<br />

Attorney for Plaintiffs<br />

Estate of Thomas E. Russ<br />

MCGIVNEY & KLUGER, P.C.<br />

WELT2 & LUXENBERG, P.C.<br />

80 Broad Street-Suite 2300<br />

700 Broadway<br />

New York, New York 100<strong>04</strong> New York, New York 10003<br />

APR 2 6 20<strong>11</strong><br />

(212) 509-3456<br />

(212) 558-5500<br />

SO ORDERED,<br />

Hon. Sherry Klein Heitler<br />

%&i#iY<br />

e-.,<br />

P4E-W VOW<br />

CLERK'S OFFICE'


-I_-<br />

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YOKK<br />

-- cowry<br />

IN RE: NEFYORK<br />

~ OF NEW YORK<br />

COUNTY<br />

: NYCAL<br />

ASBESTOS LITIGATION<br />

i I.A.S. Part 30<br />

1 (Heitler, J.)<br />

THIS DOCUMENT REFERS TO:<br />

j Index No.: 122496/00<br />

PATRICIA A. RUSSELL, INDIVIDUALLY AND i<br />

AS ADMINISTRATRIX FOR THE ESTATE OF j<br />

THOMAS E. RUSSELL, i NO OPPOSITION<br />

j SUMMARY JUDGMENT<br />

Plaintiffs, i MOTION AND ORDER<br />

-against-<br />

A. C. & S., NC., et al.,<br />

Defendants.<br />

WHEREFORE, defendant, Oakfabco, Inc., hereby requests summary judgment in the<br />

above entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules 4 3212, dismissing plaintiffs'<br />

complaint against defendant, Oakfabco, Inc., with prejudice in this action, and there being no<br />

opposition thereto,<br />

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against<br />

defendant, Oakfabco, Inc., be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and without<br />

costs.<br />

Dated: New York, New York<br />

Robert Darish, Esq.<br />

Attorney for Defendant<br />

Oakfabco, Inc.<br />

MCG~VNEY & UUCER, P.C.<br />

80 Broad Street-Suite 2300<br />

New York, New York 100<strong>04</strong><br />

(212) 509-3456<br />

SO ORDERED,<br />

WEITZ & LUXENBERG, P.C.<br />

700 Broadway<br />

ork,NewYork 10003 AkH 2 6 20<strong>11</strong><br />

t (' 4, \'


__ COUNTY OF NEW YORK<br />

IN RE: NEW YORK COIJNTY<br />

ASBESTOS LITIGATION<br />

-- ---<br />

THIS DOCUMENT REFERS TO:<br />

ANNA MULDER, INDIVIDUALLY AND AS<br />

ADMINISTRATRIX FOR THE ESTATE OF<br />

MAURITS C. MULDER,<br />

Plaintiffs,<br />

i NYCAL<br />

; ].AX Part 30<br />

i (JIeitler, J.)<br />

Index No.: 123057/00<br />

i<br />

; NO OPPOSITION<br />

i SUMMARY JUDGMENT<br />

MOTION AND OKDER<br />

-against-<br />

A. C. & S., MC., et d.,<br />

Defendants.<br />

j<br />

WEIEWFORE, defendant, Oakfabco, Inc., hereby requests summary judgment in the<br />

above entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Q 3212, dismissing plaintiffs'<br />

complaint against defendant, Oakfabco, lnc., with prejudice in this action, and there being no<br />

opposition thereto,<br />

OKDERED, that upon notic,e to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against<br />

defendant, Oakfabco, Inc., be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and without<br />

costs.<br />

Attorney for Defendant<br />

Oakfabco, Inc.<br />

MCG~VNEY & KLUGER, P.C.<br />

80 Broad Street-Suite 2300<br />

New York, New York 100<strong>04</strong><br />

(212) 509-3456<br />

Estate df Maurits C. Mu1<br />

WEITZ & LUXENBERG, P. t<br />

700 Broadway<br />

New York, New York 10003<br />

~pfi 2 6 2021<br />

SO ORDERED, ;!Y.>( I YORK<br />

ccf~~h~~t LERK s OFFICE'


SUPREME COURT OF I'HE STATE OF NEW YORK<br />

couN'ry OF NEW YORK<br />

---<br />

IN RE: NEW YORK COUNTY i NYCAL<br />

ASBESTOS LITIGATION<br />

THIS DOCUMENT REFmTO:<br />

-A<br />

ANNA MULDER, INDIVIDIJALLY AND AS<br />

ADMINISTMTRIX FOR THE ESTATE OF<br />

MAUKITS C. MULDER,<br />

Plaintiffs,<br />

j 1.A.S. Part 30<br />

! (Heitler, J.)<br />

[ Index No.: 123057/00<br />

[<br />

; NO OPPOSITION<br />

j SUMMARY JUDGMENT<br />

[ MOTION AND ORDER<br />

-against-<br />

A. C. & S., INC., et al.,<br />

Defendants. ;<br />

WHEREFORE, defendant, Treadwell Corporation, hereby requests summary judgment in<br />

the above entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules $ 3212, dismissing plaintiffs'<br />

complaint against defendant, Treadwell Corporation, with prejudice in this action, and there<br />

being no opposition thereto,<br />

QRDEKED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against<br />

defendant, Treadwell Corporation, be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and<br />

without costs.<br />

Treadwell Corporation<br />

MCCIVNEY & KLUGER, P.C.<br />

80 Broad Street-Suite 2300<br />

New York, New York 10<br />

(212) 509-3456<br />

WEITZ & LUXENBERG, P.C.<br />

700 Broadway<br />

New Y ork, New Y ork 10003<br />

APR 2 6 20<strong>11</strong><br />

SO ORDERED,<br />

QQl&liY<br />

NFW YORK<br />

CLERK'S OFFICE<br />

N0<strong>04</strong><strong>04</strong>78-1


SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YON<br />

- COUNTY OF NEW YORK<br />

1~ RE: NEW Y~RK COUNTY<br />

i NYCAL<br />

ASBESTOS LITIGATION<br />

i I.A.S. Part 39<br />

- ! (Heitler, J.)<br />

THIS DOClJMENT REFERS TO:<br />

i lndex No.: 123088/00<br />

ROBERT C. LOUGHLIN, SR.,<br />

A. C. & S., INC., et al.,<br />

Plaintiffs, i NO OPPOSITION<br />

f SUMMARY JUDGMENT<br />

-against- j MOTION AND ORDER<br />

Defendants. 4 !<br />

WHEREFORE, defendant, Oakfabco, Inc., hereby requests summary judgment in the<br />

above entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules tj 3212, dismissing plaintiffs'<br />

complaint against defendant, Oakfabco, Inc., with prejudice in this action, and there being no<br />

opposition thereto,<br />

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against<br />

defendant, Oakfabco, Inc., be and the sane are hereby dismissed with prejudice and without<br />

costs.<br />

Dated: New Y<br />

Q*[-Q<br />

Robkrt Darish, Esq.<br />

Attorney for Defendant<br />

Oakfabco, Inc.<br />

MCGI~NEY & KLUGER, P.C.<br />

80 Broad Street-Suite 2300<br />

New York, New York 100<strong>04</strong><br />

(212) 509-3456<br />

SO ORDERED,<br />

WEITZ & LUXENBERG, P.C.<br />

700 Broadway<br />

New York, New York 10003<br />

257<br />

APR 2 6 ZO'<br />

n\E')l YORK<br />

cbUNiy -074 CLERKS OFFICE'<br />

N0<strong>04</strong><strong>04</strong>74-1


SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK<br />

COUNTY OF NEW YORK<br />

In Re: NEW YORK CITYASBESTOS LITIGATION<br />

Index No.: 123830/00<br />

PAUL DUNPHEY,<br />

Plaintiff(s),<br />

NO OPPOSITION<br />

SUMMARY JUDGMENT<br />

MOTION<br />

- against -<br />

AT: apd S, JNC., (ARMSGTRONG<br />

CONTRACTING & SUPPLY) et al.,<br />

Defendants.<br />

WHEREFORE, Defendant WEIL-MCLAIN COMPANY, INC., hereinafter (“WEIL-<br />

MCLAIN”) hereby requests Summary Judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil<br />

Practice Law and Rules Section 3212, dismissing plaintiff’s complaint against Defendant Weil-<br />

McLain with prejudice, and there being no opposition thereto,<br />

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against<br />

Defendant, Weil-McLain be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and without costs<br />

to either party.<br />

Dated: qFq ,20<strong>11</strong><br />

New York, New York<br />

crJ$2---<br />

Jennifer L, Budner, Esq.<br />

WEITZ & LUXENBERG, P.C. SEGAL McCAMBRIDGE<br />

Attorneys for Plaintiff<br />

SINGER & MAHONEY, LTD.<br />

700 Broadway Attorneys for Defendant F I I.. E D<br />

New York, NY 10003<br />

Weil-McLain<br />

(212) 558-5500<br />

850 Third Avenue, Suite <strong>11</strong>00<br />

APR 2 6 20<strong>11</strong><br />

New York, NY 10022<br />

NEW YOHK<br />

COUNTY CLERK‘S OFFGF<br />

SO ORDERED,<br />

A?\? x 5 20<strong>11</strong>


SUPREME coum- OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK<br />

- COUNTY _ - _ OF ~ NEW YORK<br />

IN KE: NEW YOKK COUNTY<br />

ASBESTOS LITIGATION<br />

THIS DOCUMENT REFERS TO:<br />

PETER AVAKAS AND DOLORES AVARAS,<br />

--<br />

! NYCAL<br />

; I.A.S. Part 30<br />

(Heitler, J.)<br />

i<br />

; lndex No.: 123870/00<br />

i<br />

-against-<br />

Plaintiffs, / NO OPPOSITION<br />

/ SUMMARY JUDGMENT<br />

MOTION AND ORDER<br />

A. C. & S., TNC., et al.,<br />

- I<br />

Defendants. !<br />

WHEREFORE, defendant, Treadwell Corporation, hereby requests summary judgment in<br />

~<br />

the above entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules 5 3212, dismissing plaintiffs'<br />

I<br />

!<br />

complaint against defendant, Treadwell Corporation, with prejudice in this action, and there<br />

being no opposition thereto,<br />

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against<br />

defendant, Treadwell Corporation, be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and<br />

without costs.<br />

Dated: New York, New York<br />

4/l ,20<strong>11</strong><br />

L-<br />

Carol M. Ternpesta, bsq.<br />

Attorney for Defendant<br />

Treadwell Corporation<br />

MCGIVNEY & KLUGER, P.C.<br />

80 Broad Street-Suite 2300<br />

New York, New York 100<strong>04</strong><br />

(212) 509-3456<br />

SO ORDERED,<br />

Peter Avaras<br />

WEITZ & LUXENBERG, P.C.<br />

700 Broadway<br />

New York, New York 10003<br />

APR 2 6 20<strong>11</strong><br />

J235-4589 NEW YORK<br />

COUNTY CLERK'S OFFICE<br />

N0<strong>04</strong><strong>04</strong>78-1


---______I--<br />

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK<br />

C:OlJN'I'Y OF NEW YORK _--<br />

IN RE: NEW YORK COUNTY<br />

! NYCAL<br />

ASBESTOS LITIGATlON<br />

j 1,A.S. Part 30<br />

L_ --I<br />

-_-<br />

j (Heitler, J.)<br />

'THE DOCUMENT REFERS TO:<br />

j Index No.: 123870/00<br />

PETER AVARAS AND DOLORES AVARAS,<br />

-against-<br />

Plaintiffs, / NO OPPOSlTION<br />

j SUMMARY JUDGMENT<br />

MOTION AND ORDER<br />

A. C. & S., INC., et al.,<br />

Defendants.<br />

i<br />

WHEREFORE, defendant, Courter & Company, Inc., hereby requests summary<br />

judgment in the above entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules 5 3212, dismissing<br />

plaintiffs' complaint against defendant, Courter & Company, Inc., with prejudice in this action,<br />

and there being no opposition thereto,<br />

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against<br />

defendant, Courter & Company, Xnc., be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and<br />

without costs.<br />

Dated: New Ygrk, New York<br />

Michele J. Mittleman, Esq.<br />

Attorney for Defendant<br />

Courter Cbmpany, Inc.<br />

MCGI~~NEY & KLUGER, P.C.<br />

SO Broad Street-Suite 2300<br />

New York, New York 100<strong>04</strong><br />

(212) 509-3456<br />

SO ORDERED,<br />

Peter Avaras<br />

700 Broadway<br />

New York, New York 10003 APR 6 20<strong>11</strong><br />

CS@%6S<br />

YCWK<br />

1 ERKS OFFICE"<br />

N0<strong>04</strong><strong>04</strong>78-1


SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK<br />

COUNTY OF NEW YORK<br />

IN RE: NEW YORK COUNTY j NYCAL<br />

ASBESTOS LITIGATION<br />

THIS DOCUMENT REFERS TO:<br />

-<br />

THEODORE FRASIER, EXECUTOR FOR THE<br />

ESTATE OF CLYDE FRASIEK,<br />

-against-<br />

A. C. & S., INC., et al.,<br />

Plaintiffs,<br />

Defendants. !<br />

j 1.A.S. Part 30<br />

:<br />

0<br />

(Heitler, 3.)<br />

j IndexN .. 124331/0 100757/03<br />

!<br />

i<br />

NO OPPOSITION<br />

! SUMMARY JUDGMENT<br />

j MOTION AND 0IRI)ER<br />

WHEREFORE, defendant, Treadwell Corporation, hereby requests summary judgment in<br />

the above entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules tj 3212, dismissing plaintiffs'<br />

complaint against defendant, Treadwell Corporation, with prejudice in this action, and there<br />

being no opposition thereto,<br />

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against<br />

defendant, Treadwell Corporation, be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and<br />

without costs.<br />

Dated: New York, New York<br />

TL<br />

Treadwell Corporation<br />

MCGIVNEY & KLUGER, P.C.<br />

SO Broad Street-Suite 2300<br />

New York, New York 100<strong>04</strong><br />

(212) 509-3456<br />

SO ORDERED,<br />

Estate of Clyde Frasier<br />

WEITZ & LUXENBERG, P.C.<br />

700 Broadway<br />

NewYork,NewYork 10003<br />

;,yz 2 lj 20<strong>11</strong><br />

?\!E%;; "'r&K<br />

COUNTY CLERK'S OFFICE<br />

1235-1699<br />

N0<strong>04</strong><strong>04</strong>78-1


SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK<br />

COUNTY<br />

~ OF NEW YORK<br />

1N RE: NEW YO= COUNTY : NYCAJ,<br />

ASBESTOS 1,lTIGA'I'ION<br />

I I.A.S. Part 30<br />

! (Heitler, J.)<br />

'I'HIS DOCUMENT REFERS TO:<br />

Index 00757/03<br />

TI EODOKE FRASIER, EXECUTOR FOR THE i<br />

ESTATE OF CLYDE FRASIER,<br />

[ NO OPPOSITION<br />

Plaintiffs, ! SUMMARY JUDGMENT<br />

j MOTION AND ORDER<br />

-against-<br />

A. C. & S., INC., et ul.,<br />

- ~<br />

Defendants.<br />

j<br />

WHEREFORE, defendant, Tishman Liquidating Corp., hereby requests summary<br />

judgment in the above entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules 5 3212, dismissing<br />

plaintiffs' coniplaint against defendant, Tishman Liquidating Corp., with prejudice in this action,<br />

and there being no opposition thereto,<br />

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against<br />

defendant, Tishman Liquidating Corp., be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and<br />

without costs.<br />

MCG~VNEY & KLUGER, P.C.<br />

80 Broad Street-Suite 2300<br />

New York, New York 100<strong>04</strong><br />

(212) 509-3456<br />

SO ORDERED,<br />

Estate of Clyde Frasier<br />

WEITZ & LUXENBERG, P.C.<br />

700 Broadway<br />

NewYork,NewYork 10003<br />

APR 2 6 20<strong>11</strong><br />

NEW YORK<br />

COUNTY CLERK'S OFFICE<br />

2383-22283<br />

N0<strong>04</strong><strong>04</strong>78-1<br />

APR 15 20<strong>11</strong>


SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YON<br />

-. COUNTY OF NEW YON I-<br />

IN RE: NEW YORK COUNTY j NYCAL<br />

ASBESTOS LITIGATION j 1.A.S. Part 30<br />

! (Heitler, J.)<br />

-I<br />

'rws DOCUMENT REFERS TO:<br />

j Index No.: 124332/00<br />

ROSEMARY MICHEL, INDIVIDUALLY AND /<br />

AS EXECUTRIX FOR THE ESTATE OF<br />

GERALD J. MICHEL, i NO OPPOSITION<br />

i SUMMARY JUDGMENT<br />

Plaintiffs, MOTION AND ORDER<br />

-against-<br />

A. C. & S., INC., et al.,<br />

Defendants. :<br />

WHEEFORE, defendant, Treadwell Corporation, hereby requests summary judgment in<br />

the above entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Q 3212, dismissing plaintiffs'<br />

complaint against defendant, Treadwell Corporation, with prejudice in this action, and there<br />

being no opposition thereto,<br />

ORDERED, that upon notice to all c,o-defendants, all claims and cross claims against<br />

defendant, Treadwell Corporation, be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and<br />

without costs.<br />

Carol M. Tempesta, Esq.<br />

Attorney for Defendant<br />

Treadwell Corporation<br />

MCGIVNEY & KLUGER, P.C.<br />

80 Broad Street-Suite 2300<br />

700 Broadway<br />

New York, New York 100<strong>04</strong><br />

(212) 509-3456 2 6 20<strong>11</strong><br />

SO ORDERED, ": J' :(.,RK<br />

I- CLERK'S OFFICE<br />

N0<strong>04</strong><strong>04</strong>74-1<br />

APR 'I, 5 20<strong>11</strong>


I--<br />

SUPREME COURT OF THE STAl-E OF NEW YON<br />

COUNTY OF NEW YOKK<br />

IN RE: NEW YmTOETY<br />

! NYCAL<br />

ASBESTOS LJTlGATION<br />

j 1.A.S. Part 30<br />

! (Heitler, J.)<br />

_"-A<br />

_-<br />

THIS DOCUMENT REFERS TO:<br />

i Index No.: 124332/00<br />

ROSEMARY MICHEL, INDIVTDUAL1,Y AND<br />

AS EXECUTRIX FOR THE ESTATE OF<br />

GERALD L. MICHEL, i NO OPPOSITION<br />

j SUMMARY JUDGMENT<br />

Plaintiffs, i MOTION AND ORDER<br />

-against-<br />

A. C. & S., INC., et al.,<br />

Defendants.<br />

i<br />

WHEREFORE, defendant, Oakfabco, Inc., hereby requests summary judgment in the<br />

above entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules 8 3212, dismissing plaintiffs'<br />

complaint against defendant, Oakfabco, Inc., with prejudice in this action, and there being no<br />

opposition thereto,<br />

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against<br />

defendant, Oakfabco, Inc., be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and without<br />

costs.<br />

Dated: New Y rk, New York<br />

4 1 ,20<strong>11</strong><br />

Q*LQpJ<br />

Robert Darish, Esq.<br />

Attorney for Defendant<br />

Oakfabco, Inc.<br />

MCGIVNEY & KLUGER, P.C.<br />

80 Broad Street-Suite 2300<br />

New York, New York 100<strong>04</strong><br />

(212) 509-3456<br />

WElTZ & LUXENBERG, P.C.<br />

700 Broadway<br />

Fl<br />

SO ORDERED, APR 2 6 20<strong>11</strong><br />

2571-0747<br />

N0<strong>04</strong><strong>04</strong>74-1<br />

W ~ N + I<br />

I\!-<br />

'IC\ YORK<br />

V CLERKS OFFICE'


JYCAL<br />

TWILIA L. BILBY, as Administratrix for the : Index No. 125<strong>26</strong>3/00<br />

Estate of LANE L. BILBY, and TWILIA L.<br />

BILBY, Individually,<br />

: NO OPPOSITION<br />

Plaintiffs, : SUMMARY JUDGMENT<br />

: MOTION AND ORDER<br />

"against-<br />

A.C. & S., INC., ad.,<br />

: Hon. Sherry Klein Heitler,<br />

IAS Part 30<br />

WHEREFORE, defendant Georgia-Pacific LLC hereby request summary<br />

judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to CPLR 3212, dismissing plaintiffs'<br />

complaint against Georgia-Pacific LLC with prejudice, and there being no opposition<br />

thereto, it is hereby:<br />

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims<br />

against Georgia-Pacific LLC be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and<br />

without costs.<br />

WEITZ & LUXENBERG, P.C.<br />

Attorneys for Plaintiffs<br />

700 Broadway<br />

<strong>26</strong>4 West 40th Street<br />

New York, New York 10003<br />

New York, New York 10018<br />

(212) 558-5500 (212) 302-2400<br />

Dated: New York, New York<br />

APR 2 6 20<strong>11</strong><br />

NEW YORK<br />

c13blN~-~ CLERK'S OFFICE'<br />

SO ORDERED:


-_--<br />

COUNTY OF NEW Y ORK -<br />

1N RE: NEW YORK COUNTY<br />

ASBESTOS LITIGATION<br />

--<br />

I NYCAL<br />

j I.A.S. Part 30<br />

i (Heiller. 3.1<br />

- .<br />

TINS DOCUMENT REFERS TO:<br />

j Jndex No.: <strong>11</strong>939O/<br />

13 E'T'I'Y BI SHOP, INDIVIDUALLY AND<br />

EXECUTRIX FOR THE ESTATE OF ROBERT<br />

D. BISHOP, SR.,<br />

-against-<br />

A. C. & S., lNc., et af.,<br />

P laj nti ffs ,<br />

j<br />

/ NO OPPOSITION<br />

i SUMMARY JUDGMENT<br />

MOTION AND ORDER<br />

i<br />

n<br />

Defendants.<br />

j<br />

WHEREFORE, defendant, Patterson Pump Ca., hereby requests summary judgment in<br />

the above entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules $ 3212, dismissing plaintiffs'<br />

complaint against defendant, Patterson Pump Co., with prejudice in this action, and there being<br />

no opposition thereto,<br />

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against<br />

defendant, Patterson Pump Co., be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and without<br />

costs.<br />

NO<strong>04</strong><strong>04</strong>78- 1<br />

APR 1520<strong>11</strong>


-<br />

COUNTY OF NEW YORK<br />

.- tN E: NEW YORK coumy<br />

,___ -<br />

AS BES' ['OS L ITIG AT1 ON<br />

_-____-___<br />

13E'I'l-Y BISHOP, JNDIVIDUALIdY AND<br />

EXECUTRIX FOR THE ESTATE OF ROBERT<br />

D. BISHOP, SK.,<br />

PI ain tiffs,<br />

NY CAL,<br />

I.A.S. Pa<strong>11</strong> 30<br />

(Heitler, J.)<br />

w<br />

Index No.: <strong>11</strong>9390/00 125<strong>26</strong>8/0<br />

NO OPPOSITION<br />

SIJMMARY - -. JUDGMENT<br />

MOTlON AND ORDER<br />

n<br />

-against-<br />

A. C. & S., INC., et al.,<br />

- Defendants. j<br />

WHEREFORE, defendant,, Safeguard Industrial Equipment Co., hereby requests<br />

summary judgment in the above entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules 9 3212,<br />

dismissing plaintiffs' complaint against defendant, Safeguard Industrial Equipment Co., with<br />

prejudice in this action, and there being no opposition thereto,<br />

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against<br />

defendant, Safeguard Industrial Equipment Co., be and the same are hereby dismissed with<br />

prejudice and without costs.<br />

Attorney for Defendant<br />

Safeguard Industrial Equipment Co.<br />

MCGIVNEY & KLUGER, P.C.<br />

80 Broad Street-Suite 2300<br />

New York, New York 100<strong>04</strong><br />

(212) 509-3456<br />

SO ORDERED,<br />

Estate of Robert D. Bishop, Sr.<br />

WElTZ & LUXENBERG,<br />

700 Broadway<br />

New York, New York 1 003<br />

FILED<br />

LPR 2 6 Ntl


SUPKEME COURT OF *rm STATE OF NEW YORK<br />

--- COUNTY OFNEW YOKK<br />

IN RE: NEW YORK COTjNy<br />

NYCAL<br />

ASBESTOS LI'fIGATI ON<br />

I.A.S. Part 30<br />

(Heitler, J.)<br />

THIS DOCUMENT REFERS TO:<br />

BETTY BISHOP, INDIVIDUALLY AND<br />

EXECUTRIX FOR THE ESTATE OF ROBERT<br />

D. BISHOP, SK.,<br />

-against-<br />

A. C. & S., TNC., et ul.,<br />

Plaintiffs,<br />

Defendants.<br />

Index No.: <strong>11</strong>93901 0, 125<strong>26</strong>8/0<br />

NO OPPOSITION<br />

SUMMARY JUDGMENT<br />

MOTION AND ORDER<br />

("2<br />

WHEREFORE, defendant, Treadwell Corporation, hereby requests summary judgment in<br />

the above entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules $ 3212, dismissing plaintiffs'<br />

complaint against defendant, Treadwell Corporation, with prejudice in this action, and there<br />

being no opposition thereto,<br />

OFUIERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against<br />

defendant, Treadwell Corporation, be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and<br />

without costs.<br />

Carol M. Tempesta, Esq.<br />

Attorney for Defendant<br />

Treadwell Corporation<br />

MCGIVNEY & KLUGER, P.C.<br />

80 Broad Street-Suite 2300<br />

New York, New York 100<strong>04</strong><br />

(21 2) 509-3456<br />

SO ORDERED,<br />

,20<strong>11</strong> p.,<br />

*y-=-h&* ) p)<br />

L% ic f*<br />

, LtlPb+XWJ<br />

k+az*f#*<br />

f - d fiG2-i t_<br />

Attorney for Plaintiffs<br />

Estate of Robert D. Bishop,<br />

WEITZ & LUXENBERG, P.C.<br />

700 Broadway<br />

New York, New York 10003<br />

1235-20654<br />

APR 2 6 20<strong>11</strong><br />

pdy-\\*j '*iCRK<br />

C;LZHK;'S OFFICE<br />

N0<strong>04</strong><strong>04</strong>78-1<br />

p,pR 15 20<strong>11</strong>


SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK<br />

COUNTY OF NEW YORK<br />

IN RE: NEW YORK COUNTY j NYCAL<br />

ASBESTOS LITIGATION j I.A.S. Part 30<br />

- 1 1 ~<br />

THIS DOCUMENT REFERS TO:<br />

BETTY BISHOP, INDIVIDUALLY AND<br />

EXECUTRIX FOR THE ESTATE OF ROBERT<br />

D. BISHOP, SR.,<br />

-against-<br />

A. C. & S., INC., et al.,<br />

i<br />

0<br />

(Heitler, J.)<br />

i lndex No.: <strong>11</strong>9390/00, 25<strong>26</strong>8/0<br />

j<br />

/ NO OPPOSITION<br />

j<br />

SUMMARY JUDGMENT<br />

Plaintiffs, i MOTION AND OR.DER<br />

Defendants.<br />

j<br />

WHEREFORE, defendant, Tishman Liquidating Cop, hereby requests summary<br />

judgment in the above entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules 6 3212, dismissing<br />

plaintiffs’ complaint against defendant, Tishman Liquidating Corp., with prejudice in this action,<br />

and there being no opposition thereto,<br />

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against<br />

defendant, Tishman Liquidating Corp., be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and<br />

without costs.<br />

Dated: New Yo&, New York<br />

($ttomey fordant<br />

ishman Li dating Coy.<br />

MCCIVNEY KLUGER, P.C.<br />

80 Broad Street-Suite 2300<br />

New York, New York 100<strong>04</strong><br />

(212) 509-3456<br />

SO ORDERED,<br />

Hon. Sherry Klein Heitler<br />

Y. -\*A.<br />

5-<br />

h w *<br />

>,-<br />

Estate of Robert D. Bishop, Srd::<br />

WEITZ & LUXENBERG, P.C. h<br />

700 Broadway<br />

York, New York 10003<br />

/),E. i. 2. 6 20<strong>11</strong><br />

:I. ‘id kGRi<<br />

COUNTY CLERKS QFFlCE<br />

2383-22475AR<br />

N0<strong>04</strong><strong>04</strong>78-I


SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK<br />

COUNTY OF NEW YORK<br />

' NYCAL<br />

BETTY ANN BISHOP, Individually and as Executrix :<br />

Part 30<br />

for the Estate of ROBERT D. BISHOP SR.,<br />

(Hon. Sherry Klein Heitler)<br />

Plaintiff(s),<br />

* Index No.: 125<strong>26</strong>8-00<br />

WHEREFORE, defendant CRANE CO. hereby requests summary judgment in the<br />

above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 32 12, dismissing<br />

plaintiffs complaint against defendant CRANE CO. with prejudice, and there being no<br />

opposition thereto,<br />

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against<br />

defendant CRANE CO, be, and the same are hereby, dismissed with prejudice and without costs.<br />

Dated: 3 \> O\ \ \<br />

NewAork, New York<br />

Frank Ortiz, Esq.<br />

WEITZ & LUXENB<br />

Attorneys for Plaintiff(s)<br />

700 Broadway<br />

New York, NY 10003<br />

(2 12) 558-5500<br />

CRANE CO.<br />

599 Lexington Aven FILED<br />

e<br />

New York, NY 10022<br />

(212) 536-3900<br />

APR 2 6 20<strong>11</strong><br />

'


New<br />

LAWRENCE F. CAVESE and ANNA CAVESE,<br />

-against-<br />

Plaintiffs,<br />

NYCAL<br />

I.A.S. Part 30<br />

Hon. Sherry Klein Heitler, J.S.C.<br />

Index No.: f i z ><br />

<strong>11</strong>9387-2000<br />

NO OPPOSITION SUMMARY JUDGMENT<br />

MOTION AND ORDER<br />

A.C. &S. INC., et al. including,<br />

FOSTER WHEELER CORPORATION,<br />

Defendants.<br />

WHEREFORE, defendant FOSTER WHEELER, L.L.C. (sued herein as “FOSTER WHEELER<br />

CORPORATION”) hereby request summary judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil<br />

Practice Law and Rules Section 3212, dismissing plaintiffs’ complaint against defendant FOSTER<br />

WHEELER, L.L.C. with prejudice, and there being no opposition thereto,<br />

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against defendant<br />

FOSTER WHEELER, L.L.C. be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and without costs.<br />

Dated:<br />

I<br />

York, New York<br />

Frank Ortiz, Esq.<br />

Weitz i3 Luxenberg, P.C.<br />

Attorney for Plaintvfs<br />

700 Broadway<br />

New York, New York 100<br />

--<br />

Dennis E. Vega, Esq. ()<br />

Sedgwick, Detert, Moran & Arnold, LLP<br />

Attorneys for Foster Wheeler, I. L.C.<br />

Three Gateway Center, 12‘h Floor<br />

wark, NJ 07102<br />

SO ORDERED, APR 2 6 20<strong>11</strong><br />

NEW YORK<br />

COUNTY CLERK‘S OFFIS<br />

NJ/34 1736~1


NYCAL<br />

I.A.S. Part 30<br />

Hon. Sherry Klein Heitler, J.S.C.<br />

THOMAS CARROLL et al.,<br />

Index No.:<br />

-against-<br />

A.C. &S. INC., et al. including,<br />

FOSTER WHEELER CORPORATION,<br />

Plaintiff,<br />

NO OPPOSITION SUMMARY JUDGMENT<br />

MOTION AND ORDER<br />

Defendants.<br />

WHEREFORE, defendant FOSTER WHEELER, L.L.C. (sued herein as “FOSTER WHEELER<br />

CORPORATION”) hereby request summary judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil<br />

Practice Law and Rules Section 3212, dismissing plaintiffs’ complaint against defendant FOSTER<br />

WHEELER, L.L.C. with prejudice, and there being no opposition thereto,<br />

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against defendant<br />

FOSTER WHEELER, L.L.C. be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and without costs.<br />

Frank Ortiz, Esq.<br />

Weitz & Luxenberg, P.C.<br />

Sedgwick, Detert, Moran & Arnold, LLP<br />

Attorney for Plaintflfs<br />

Attorneys for Foster Wheeler, L. L.C.<br />

700 Broadway<br />

Three Gateway Center, 12fh Floor<br />

New York, New York 10003 Newark, NJ 07102<br />

SO ORDERED,<br />

F\LEQ<br />

NJ/341735vl


-I-<br />

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK<br />

COUNTY OF NEW YORK<br />

IN RE: NEW YO% COUNTY<br />

! NYCAI,<br />

ASBESTOS LITIGATION<br />

i I.A.S. Part 30<br />

0<br />

! (Heitler, J.)<br />

THIS DOCUMENT REFERS TO:<br />

j Index No.: <strong>11</strong>9394/0 100588/0<br />

HARVEY L. FLEITMAN AND VIVIAN M.<br />

FLEITMAN,<br />

\ NO OPPOSITION<br />

Plaintiffs, j SUMMARY JUDGMENT<br />

/ MOTION AND OlRDER<br />

-against-<br />

A. C. & S., INC., et al.,<br />

Defendants.<br />

i<br />

WHEREFORE, defendant, Oakfabco, Inc., hereby requests summary judgr e t in the<br />

above entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules § 3212, dismissing plaintiffs'<br />

complaint against defendant, Oakfabco, Inc., with prejudice in this action, and there being no<br />

opposition thereto,<br />

ORDEWD, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against<br />

defendant, Oakfabco, Inc., be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and without<br />

costs.<br />

Dated: New York, New York<br />

D<br />

Attorney for Defendant<br />

F+['rx<br />

Oakfabco, Inc.<br />

HarveyL. Fleitman and Vivi<br />

MCGIVNEY & KI,UGER, P.C.<br />

WEITZ & LUXENBERG, P.C.<br />

80 Broad Street-Suite 2300<br />

700 Broadway<br />

New York, New York 100<strong>04</strong><br />

(212) 509-3456<br />

New York, New York 10003<br />

(212) 558-5500 APR 2 6 20<strong>11</strong><br />

SO ORDERED,<br />

NEW VQRK<br />

2E@WiV Ci&WS OFFICE<br />

N0<strong>04</strong><strong>04</strong>74-1


_-I--<br />

SlJPREME COURT OF 'THE STATE OF NEW YORK<br />

COUNTY OF NEW YORK<br />

IN RE: NEW YokTmr'u'<br />

! NYCAL<br />

ASBESTOS LITIGATION<br />

j I.A.S. Part 30<br />

- / (Heitler, 3.)<br />

THIS DOCUMENT REFERS TO:<br />

HARVEY L. FLEITMAN AND VIVIAN M.<br />

FLEITMAN,<br />

-against-<br />

A. C. & S., INC., et al.,<br />

P 1 ain t i ffs ,<br />

0<br />

f Index No.: <strong>11</strong>9394/ 0, 100588/01<br />

i NO OPPOSITION<br />

i SUMMARY JUDGMENT<br />

MOTION AND ORDER<br />

Defendants.<br />

j<br />

WHEREFORE, defendant, Treadwell Corporation, hereby requests summary judgment in<br />

the above entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules 3 3212, dismissing plaintiffs'<br />

complaint against defendant, Treadwell Corporation, with prejudice in this action, and there<br />

being no opposition thereto,<br />

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against<br />

defendant, Treadwell Corporation, be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and<br />

without costs.<br />

Carol M. Tempesta, Esq.<br />

Attorney for Defendant<br />

Treadwell Corporation<br />

MCGIVNEY & ICLUCER, P.C.<br />

80 Broad Street-Suite 2300<br />

New York, New York 100<strong>04</strong><br />

(21 2) 509-3456 (212) 558-5500<br />

SO ORDERED,<br />

Harvey L. Fleitman and Vivian M. Fleitmk<br />

WEITZ & LUXENBERG, P.C.<br />

700 Broadway<br />

New York, New York 10003<br />

1235-1 9822<br />

APR 2 6 20l1<br />

N0<strong>04</strong><strong>04</strong>78-1<br />

APR 15 20<strong>11</strong>


I<br />

COIJN'rY OF NEW YOKK ..-<br />

_.-_.L__-___- ---I__--.<br />

1N RE: NEW YOKK COUNTY i NYCAL<br />

ASBESTOS L,ITlG AT1 ON<br />

j I.A.S. Part 30<br />

...A! (Ilcitler, J.)<br />

- -.<br />

T€€IS DOCUMENT EFERS TO:<br />

WARVEY L. FLEI'TMAN AND VIVIAN M.<br />

ELEITMAN,<br />

-against-<br />

Plaintiffs,<br />

0<br />

; Index No.: <strong>11</strong>9394/00, I005&8/<br />

NO Ol'POSlTION<br />

i SUMMARY JUDGMENT<br />

i MOTION AND ORDER<br />

A. C. & S., INC., et al.,<br />

Defendants. - i<br />

WHEREFORE, defendant, Safeguard Industrial Equipment Co., hereby requests<br />

summary judgment in the above entitled case, pursuant to Civil. Practice Law and Rules 0 3212,<br />

dismissing plaintiffs' complaint against defendant, Safeguard Industrial Equipment Co., with<br />

prejudice in this action, and there being no opposition thereto,<br />

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against<br />

defendant, Safeguard Industrial Equipment Co., be and the same are hereby dismissed with<br />

prejudice and without costs.<br />

Attorney for Defend<br />

Harvey L. Fleitman and Vivian M, Fleitman<br />

MCGWNEY & KLUGER, P.C.<br />

WEITZ & LUXENBERG, P.C.<br />

80 Broad Street-Suite 2300<br />

700 Broadway<br />

New York, New York 100<strong>04</strong><br />

New York, New York 1<br />

(212) 509-3456 , (212) 558-5500


~ c(iuN'rY<br />

L<br />

SUPREME COiURT OF 'IHE STATE OF NEW YORK<br />

OF NEW I YORK _-<br />

_____I<br />

iN RE: NEW YOIX cowry<br />

j NYCAL<br />

AS €3 EST0 S LIT I GATT ON<br />

j I.A.S. Part 30<br />

i<br />

0<br />

(Heitler, J.)<br />

_- --_._I-<br />

THIS DOCUMENT REFERS TO:<br />

j Index No.: <strong>11</strong>9394/ 100588/01<br />

HARVEY i, FLEI'I'MAN AND VIVIAN M.<br />

FLEITMAN,<br />

[ NO OPPOSITION<br />

Plaintiffs? j SUMMARY JUDGMENT<br />

\ MOTJON AND ORDER<br />

-against-<br />

A. C. & S., INC., et al.,<br />

Defendants.<br />

WHEREFORE, defendant, Courter & Company, Inc., hereby requests summary<br />

j<br />

/<br />

judgment in the above entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules 5 3212, dismissing<br />

plaintiffs' complaint against defendant, Courter & Company, Inc., with prejudice in this action,<br />

and there being no opposition thereto,<br />

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against<br />

defendant, Courter & Company, hc., be and the shme are hereby dismissed with prejudice and<br />

without costs.<br />

80 Broad Street-Suite 2300<br />

New York, New York 100<strong>04</strong><br />

(21 2> 509-3456<br />

WEITZ & LUXENBERG, P.C.<br />

SO ORDERED,<br />

N0<strong>04</strong><strong>04</strong>78-1


SIJPIIEME COURT OF 'THE S'I'ATE OF NEW YORK<br />

COUNTY OF NEW YORK .-<br />

IN RE: NEW YORK COUNTY / NYCAL,<br />

ASBESTOS LIT1 G A'1 'I ON j I.A.S. Part 30<br />

\ (Heitlcr, J.)<br />

0<br />

-<br />

THIS DOCUMENT REFERS 'ro:<br />

j Index No.: <strong>11</strong>9394/00 100585/01<br />

HARVEY L. FLEITMAN AND VIVIAN M.<br />

FLEJTMAN,<br />

-against-<br />

A. C. & S., I'NC., et al.,<br />

PI ai nt i ffs,<br />

[ NO OYPOSlTION<br />

j SUMMARY JUDGMENT<br />

i MOTION AND ORDER<br />

Defendants.<br />

j<br />

WHEREFORJZ, defendant, Tishman Liquidating Corp., hereby requests summary<br />

judgment in the above entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules 5 3212, dismissing<br />

plaintiffs' complaint against defendant, Tishman Liquidating Corp., with prejudice in this action,<br />

and there being no opposition thereto,<br />

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against<br />

defendant, Tishman Liquidating Corp., be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and<br />

without costs.<br />

MCGIVNEY & KLUGER, P.C.<br />

SO Broad Street-Suite 2300<br />

New York, New York 100<strong>04</strong><br />

(212) 509-3456<br />

SO ORDERED,<br />

700 Broadway<br />

New York, New York 10003<br />

2383-22468U<br />

N0<strong>04</strong><strong>04</strong>78-I


SIJI'REME COUK'I' OF THE STATE OF NEW YOKK<br />

COUN'TY OF NEW YORK<br />

.-~I-" - -_ --<br />

~hr RE NEW YORK couwry<br />

: NYCAL,<br />

A SB E S 1'0 S LIT1 GAT1 ON<br />

i I.A.S. Part 30<br />

j (Heitler,.I.><br />

0<br />

THlS DOCUMENT REFERS 'TO:<br />

j Index No. : <strong>11</strong>9394/00 100621 /O<br />

JOSE F. FERNANDEZ AND ARLENE<br />

FEKNANDEZ,<br />

i NO OPPOSITION<br />

Plaintiffs, j SUMMARY JUDGMENT<br />

i MOTION AND ORJIER<br />

-against-<br />

A. C. & S., INC., et al.,<br />

Defendants.<br />

I<br />

WHEREFORE, defendant, Patterson Pump Co., hereby requests summary judgment in<br />

the above entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules § 3212, dismissing plaintiffs'<br />

complaint against defendant, Patterson Pump Co., with prejudice in this action, and there being<br />

no opposition thereto,<br />

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against<br />

defendant, Patterson Pump Co., be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and without<br />

costs.<br />

Dated: New Yo&, New York<br />

Pattersin pump CO.<br />

MCGIVNEY & KLUGER, P.C.<br />

80 Broad Street-Suite 2300<br />

New York, New York 100<strong>04</strong><br />

(212) 509-3456<br />

SO ORDERED,<br />

,<br />

---e<br />

Hon. Sherry Klein Heitler<br />

Jose F. Fernandez and Arlene Fernandez<br />

WEITZ & LUXENBERG, P.C.<br />

700 Broadway<br />

New York, New York 100<br />

2 6 la''<br />

s OFF\CEJ<br />

CLERK<br />

454-8847b1p,.,' \/QRK<br />

coiut\s7v<br />

N0<strong>04</strong><strong>04</strong>78-1


SLJ PlERIE COURT OF 'THE STATE OF NEW YORK<br />

COUNTY OF NEW YORK<br />

IN RE: NEW YORK COUN'I'Y<br />

NYCAL<br />

ASBES'I'OS LITIGA'rION<br />

1.A.S. Part 30<br />

(Hei tler, J .)<br />

THIS DOCUMENT REFERS TO:<br />

Index No.:<br />

JOSE F. FERNANDEZ AND ARLENE<br />

FERNANDEZ,<br />

NO OPPOSITION<br />

Plaintiffs, SUMMARY JUDGMENT<br />

MOTION AND ORDER<br />

-against-<br />

A. C. & S., INC., et al.,<br />

Defendants.<br />

i<br />

WHEREFORE, defendant, Courter & Company, Inc., hereby requests summary<br />

judgment in the above entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules 0 3212, dismissing<br />

plaintiffs' complaint against defendant, Courter & Company, Inc., with prejudice in this action,<br />

and there being no opposition thereto,<br />

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against<br />

defendant, Courter & Company, Inc., be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and<br />

without costs.<br />

Courter & Company, Inc.<br />

MCGIVNEY & UUGER, P.C.<br />

80 Broad Street-Suite 2300<br />

New York. New York 100<strong>04</strong><br />

(2 12) 509-3456<br />

SO ORDERED,<br />

Jose F. Femandez and Arlene Fernandez<br />

WElTZ & LUXENBERG, P.C.<br />

700 Broadway<br />

New York. New Yoxk 1000<br />

i<br />

I<br />

N0<strong>04</strong><strong>04</strong>78-1


~~<br />

I<br />

SUPKEME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YOKK<br />

COUNTY OF NEW YORK<br />

1N RE: NEW YORK COUNTY<br />

j NYCAL<br />

ASBESTOS LITIGATION<br />

j I.A.S. Part 30<br />

i (Heitler, J.)<br />

THIS DOCUMENT REFERS TO:<br />

-,<br />

Index No.:<br />

JOSE F. FEWANDEZ AND ARLENE<br />

FERNANDEZ,<br />

NO OPPOSITION<br />

Plaintiffs, SUMMARY JUDGMENT<br />

MOTION AND ORDER<br />

-against-<br />

A. C. & S., INC., etal.,<br />

Defendants.<br />

i<br />

WHEREFORE, defendant, Treadwell Corporation, hereby requests summary judgment in<br />

the above entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules 5 3212, dismissing plaintiffs'<br />

complaint against defendant, Treadwell Corporation, with prejudice in this action, and there<br />

being no opposition thereto,<br />

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against<br />

defendant, Treadwell Corporation, be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and<br />

without costs.<br />

Attorney for Defendant<br />

Treadwell Corporation<br />

Jose F. Fernandez and Arlene Fernandez<br />

MCGIVNEY & KLUGER, P.C.<br />

WEITZ & LUXENBERG, P.C.<br />

80 Broad Street-Suite 2300<br />

700 Broadway<br />

New York. New York 100<strong>04</strong><br />

New York, New York 10003<br />

(212) 509-3456 AFR 2 6 20<strong>11</strong><br />

SO ORDERED,<br />

NEW YG'TK<br />

QWR-rf CLERK'S OFF ICE<br />

N0<strong>04</strong><strong>04</strong>78-1


-I<br />

SUPREME COURT OF 'THE STATE OF NEW YORK<br />

-_--I COUNTY OF NEW YORK<br />

I-.-<br />

1N RE: NEW YON COUNT<br />

j NYCAL<br />

ASBESTOS LITIGATION<br />

i I.A.S. Part 30<br />

i (Heitler, J.)<br />

THIS DOCTJMENT REFERS TO:<br />

' Index No.:<br />

DAVID J. GIANCARLO AND NOREEN K.<br />

GIANCAKLO,<br />

NO OPPOSITION<br />

Plaintiffs, SUMMARY JUDGMENT<br />

MOTION AND ORDER<br />

-against-<br />

A. C. & S., INC., et ul.,<br />

Defendants.<br />

WHEREFORE, defendant, Oakfabco, Inc.,<br />

hereby requests summary judgment in the<br />

above entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules § 3212, dismissing plaintiffs'<br />

complaint against defendant, Oakfabco, Inc., with prejudice in this action, and there being no<br />

opposition thereto,<br />

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against<br />

defendant, Oakfabco, Inc., be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and without<br />

Costs.<br />

Dated: New York, New York<br />

Robert Darish, Esq.<br />

Attorney for Defendant<br />

Oakfabco, Inc.<br />

MCGIVNEY & KLUGER, P.C.<br />

80 Broad Street-Suite 2300<br />

New York, New York 100<strong>04</strong><br />

(2 12) 509-3456 APR 2 6 20<strong>11</strong><br />

NEW YORK<br />

N0<strong>04</strong><strong>04</strong>74-1


SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK<br />

I COUNTY OF NEW YORK -<br />

IN RE: NEW YORK COUNTY<br />

! NYCAL<br />

ASBESTOS LITIGATION j I.A.S. Part 30<br />

i (Heitler, J.)<br />

THIS DOCUMENT REFERS TO:<br />

i Index No.: 101205/01<br />

FLORE ASHCRAFT, INDIVIDUALLY AND AS !<br />

PROPOSED EXECUTRIX FOR THE ESTATE<br />

j<br />

OF JAMES ASHCRAFT, \ NO OPPOSITION<br />

j SUMMARY JUDGMENT<br />

Plaintiffs, \ MOTION AND ORDER<br />

-against-<br />

A. C. & S., DX., et al.,<br />

Defendants. :<br />

WHEREFORE, defendant, Courter & Company, Inc., hereby requests summary<br />

judgment in the above entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules 5 3212, dismissing<br />

plaintiffs' complaint against defendant, Courter & Company, Inc., with prejudice in this action,<br />

and there being no opposition thereto,<br />

OKDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against<br />

defendant, Courter & Company, Inc., be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and<br />

without costs.<br />

Attorney for Defendant<br />

Courter & Company, Inc.<br />

MCGimY & KLUGER, P.C.<br />

80 Broad Street-Suite 2300<br />

New York, New York 100<strong>04</strong><br />

(212) 509-3456<br />

SO ORDERED,<br />

EstateofJames Ashcraft<br />

WEITZ & LUXENBERG, P.C.<br />

700 Broadway<br />

NewYork,NewYork 10003<br />

F 1 L E D<br />

APR 2 6 *'"<br />

b\E'


S[Jl'REMl? CXIIJK'T OF THE S'I'ATE OF NEW YORK<br />

C:OINI'Y OF NEW YOKK<br />

c<br />

IN RE: NEW YORK COUNTY<br />

i NYUAL<br />

ASBESTOS 1,JTIGATlON<br />

1 I.A.S. Part 30<br />

- i (Heitler, J.)<br />

THIS IlOClJMEN'T REFERS TOj<br />

Indcx No.: 101205/01<br />

FLORE ASHCRAFT, INDIVIDUALLY AND AS !<br />

PROPOSED EXECUTRIX FOR THE ESTATE i<br />

OF JAMES ASEICRAFT,<br />

: NO OPPOSITION<br />

! SUMMARY JUDGMENT<br />

Plaintiffs, j MOTION AND ORDER<br />

_____I^- -<br />

-against-<br />

A. C. & S., INC., et al.,<br />

~.-- Defendants. [<br />

WHEREFORE, defendant, Safeguard Industrial Equipment Co., hereby requests<br />

summary judgment in the above entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice L,aw and Rules 6 3212,<br />

dismissing plaintiffs' complaint against defendant, Safeguard Industrial Equipment Co., with<br />

prejudice in this action, and there being no opposition thereto,<br />

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against<br />

defendant, Safeguard Industrial Equipment Co., be and the same are hereby dismissed with<br />

prejudice and without costs.<br />

Dated: New York, New York<br />

fi<br />

--<br />

Attorney f 'or Defendant<br />

Safeguard Industrial Equipment Co.<br />

MCGIVNEY & KLWGER, P.C.<br />

80 Broad Street-Suite 2300<br />

New York, New York 100<strong>04</strong><br />

(212) 509-3456<br />

SO ORDERED,<br />

Attornev for Plaintiffs<br />

Estate df James Ashcraft<br />

WEITZ & LUXENBERG, P.<br />

700 Broadway<br />

w York, New York 10003<br />

a:<br />

ApR 2 6 ''"<br />

NOO4<strong>04</strong>78-I APR 15 20<strong>11</strong>


SUPREME COURT OF T€lE STATE OF NEW YOKK<br />

COUNTY OF NEW YORK<br />

’ IN RE: NEW YORK COUNTY<br />

ASBESTOS LITIGATION<br />

_.<br />

‘THIS DOCIJMENT REFERS TO:<br />

FLOE ASHCRAFT, INDIVIDUALLY AND AS<br />

PROPOSED EXECUTRIX FOR THE ESTATE<br />

OF JAMES ASHCRAFT,<br />

-against-<br />

A. C. & S., INC., et ul.,<br />

Plaintiffs,<br />

Defendants. -<br />

NYCAL<br />

I.A.S. Part 30<br />

(Hei tler, J .)<br />

Index No.: 101205/01<br />

NO OPPOSITION<br />

SUMMARY ,JUDGMENT<br />

MOTION AND ORJIER<br />

WHEREFORE, defendant, Treadwell Corporation, hereby requests summary judgment in<br />

the above entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules 8 3212, dismissing plaintiffs’<br />

complaint against defendant, Treadwell Corporation, with prejudice in this action, and there<br />

being no opposition thereto,<br />

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against<br />

defendant, Treadwell Corporation, be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and<br />

without costs.<br />

Carol M. Tempesta, Esq.<br />

Attorney for Defendant<br />

Treadwell Corporation<br />

MCGIVNEY & KLUGER, P.C.<br />

80 Broad Street-Suite 2300<br />

New York, New York 100<strong>04</strong><br />

(212) 509-3456<br />

SO ORDEED,<br />

WEITZ & LUXENBERG, P.C.<br />

700 Broadway<br />

New York, New York 10003<br />

FILED<br />

APR 2 6 20<strong>11</strong><br />

1235e8mlY<br />

NEW YORK<br />

CLERK‘S OFFICE<br />

N0<strong>04</strong><strong>04</strong>78-1<br />

APR 15 20<strong>11</strong>


I.<br />

SUPREME COIJK'I'OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK<br />

COUNTY . OF NEW YON<br />

-I__-_I<br />

IN RE: NEW YOIU?EUTTY<br />

! NYCAL,<br />

ASBESTOS LITIGATION<br />

j I.A.S. Part 30<br />

----- j (Heitler, J.)<br />

TI IIS DOCUMENT REFERS TO:<br />

i Index No.: 101205/01<br />

FLOW ASWCRAFT, INDIVlDUALLY AND AS i<br />

PROPOSED EXECUTRIX FOR THE ESTATE i<br />

OF JAMES ASHCRAFT,<br />

[ NO OPPOSITION<br />

j SUMMARY JUDGMENT<br />

Plaintiffs, ! MOTION AND ORDER<br />

-against-<br />

A. C. & $., INC., et al.,<br />

- Defendants. /<br />

WHEREFORE, defendant, Tishan Liquidating Corp.,<br />

hereby requests summary<br />

judgment in the above entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules 6 3212, dismissing<br />

plaintiffs' complaint against defendant, Tishman Liquidating Corp,, with prejudice in this action,<br />

and there being no opposition thereto,<br />

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against<br />

defendant, Tishman Liquidating Corp., be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and<br />

without costs.<br />

Dated: New York, New York<br />

MCGIVNEY & KLUGER, P.C.<br />

80 Broad Street-Suite 2300<br />

New York, New York 100<strong>04</strong><br />

(2 12) 509-3456<br />

SO ORDERED, -<br />

c<br />

Hon. Sherry Kleir! Heitler<br />

Estate of James Ashcraft<br />

WEITZ & LUXENBERG, P.C.<br />

700 Broadway<br />

New York, New York 10003<br />

(212) 558-5500<br />

N0<strong>04</strong><strong>04</strong>74-1


SUPREME COURI’ OF THE STAI’E OF NEW YORK<br />

- COUNTY OF NEW YOKX<br />

L-<br />

IN RE: NEW YORK COIJNTY<br />

ASBESTOS LITIGATION<br />

THIS DOCUMENT REFERS TO:<br />

I- -<br />

FLOE ASHCRAFT, INDIVIDUALLY AND AS<br />

PROPOSED EXECUTRIX FOR THE ESTATE<br />

OF JAMES ASHCRAFT,<br />

Plaintiffs,<br />

: NYCAI,<br />

j I.A.S. Part 30<br />

i (Heitler, I.)<br />

i Index No.: 101 205/01<br />

j<br />

j NO OPPOSITION<br />

i SUMMARY JUDGMENT<br />

MOTION AND ORDER<br />

-against-<br />

A. C. & S., INC., et al.,<br />

Defendants. :<br />

WHEREFOW,, defendant, Patterson Pump Co., hereby requests summary judgment in<br />

the above entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules 4 3212, dismissing plaintiffs’<br />

complaint against defendant, Patterson Pump Co., with prejudice in this action, and there being<br />

no opposition thereto,<br />

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against<br />

defendant, Patterson Pump Co., be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and without<br />

costs.<br />

Dated: New York. New York<br />

Attorney for Defendant<br />

Patterson Pump Co.<br />

McGI~Y & KLUGER, P.C.<br />

80 Broad Street-Suite 2300<br />

Attorney for Plaintiffs .. -‘ -“I*<br />

Estate of James Ashcraft<br />

WEITZ & LUXENBERG, P.C.<br />

700 Broadway<br />

New xork, New York 10003<br />

\v<br />

New York, New York 100<strong>04</strong> PPR ’<br />

(212) 509-3456<br />

2 w<br />

SO ORDERED,<br />

N0<strong>04</strong><strong>04</strong>78- 1


SUPREME C'OiJK'I: 01; Tk1E STA'J'E OF NEW J'OFK<br />

_, COIIN'I'Y OF NEW YORK --<br />

IN RE: NEW YORK COUNTY<br />

NYCAL<br />

ASBESTOS LITIGATION<br />

1.A.S. Part 30<br />

-. - - (Heitler, J-)<br />

THIS DOCUMENT REFERS TO:<br />

TERRY M. KESSLER AND MARSHA<br />

KESSLER,<br />

Index No.: 1 1 9400100a6-><br />

100787/03<br />

-against-<br />

A. C. & S., NC., et a].,<br />

Plaintiffs,<br />

Defendants.<br />

NO OPPOSITION<br />

SUMMARY JUDGMENT<br />

MOTION AND OFWER<br />

WHEREFORE, defendant, Safeguard Industrial Equipment ,Co., hereby requests<br />

summary judgment in the above entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules $ 3212,<br />

dismissing plaintiffs' complaint against defendant, Safeguard Industrial Equipment Co., with<br />

prejudice in this action, and there being no opposition thereto,<br />

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against<br />

defendant, Safeguard Industrial Equipment Co., be and the same are hereby dismissed with<br />

prejudice and without costs.<br />

Attorney for Defendant<br />

Safeguard Industrial Equipment Co.<br />

MCGIVNEY & KLUGER, P.C.<br />

80 Broad Street-Suite 2300<br />

New York, New York 100<strong>04</strong><br />

(212) 509-3456<br />

SO OmERED,<br />

Carl Kroger and Carol Ann Kroger<br />

WEIT2 & LUXENBERG, P.<br />

700 Broadway<br />

IL I<br />

APA 2 6 20<strong>11</strong><br />

Hon. Sherry Klein Heitler 324-564&@! 'fc'B K<br />

COUNTY CLE8KS aWl&<br />

N0<strong>04</strong><strong>04</strong>78-1


SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK<br />

COUNTY OF NEW YOKK<br />

IN RE: NEW YORK COUNTY<br />

i NYCAL<br />

ASBESTOS LITIGATION<br />

j I.A.S. Part 30<br />

i (Heitler, J.)<br />

'THIS DOCUMENT REFERS TO:<br />

i Index No.: <strong>11</strong>9400/06-?)<br />

TERRY M. KESSLER AND MARSHA<br />

1007&7/03<br />

KESSLER,<br />

-against-<br />

A. C. & S., INC., et al.,<br />

Plaintiffs,<br />

Defendants.<br />

i NO OPPOSITION<br />

j SUMMARY JUDGMENT<br />

[ MOTION AND ORDER<br />

j<br />

WHEREFORE, defendant, Tishman Liquidating Corp., hereby requests summary<br />

judgment in the above entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules 5 3212, dismissing<br />

plaintiffs' complaint against defendant, Tishman Liquidating Corp., with prejudice in this action,<br />

and there being no opposition thereto,<br />

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against<br />

defendant, Tishman Liquidating Corp., be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and<br />

without costs.<br />

Dated: New York New York<br />

MCGIVNEY & KLUGER, P.C.<br />

80 Broad Street-Suite 2300<br />

New York, New New York, New York 10003<br />

(2 12) 509-3456<br />

so ORDERED,<br />

APf8 2 6 2OTF<br />

NEW YORK<br />

2 kLERK'S OFFtCE<br />

N0<strong>04</strong><strong>04</strong>78-1


~<br />

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK<br />

COUNTY OF NEW YOIX<br />

---<br />

IN RE: NEW YORK COUNTY<br />

i NYCAL<br />

ASBESTOS LITIGATION<br />

i I.A.S. Part 30<br />

\ (Heitler, J.)<br />

THIS DOCUMENT REFERS *so:<br />

Index No.: <strong>11</strong>9400/00,6=><br />

'TERRY M. KESSLER AND MARSHA 100787/03<br />

KESSLER,<br />

-against-<br />

Plaintiffs, i NO OPPOSITION<br />

[ SUMMARY JUDGMENT<br />

! MOTION AND ORDER<br />

A. C. & S., WC., et al.,<br />

- Defendants. t<br />

WHEREFORJ?, defendant, Treadwell Corporation, hereby requests summary juhgrnent <strong>11</strong>1<br />

the above entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules 5 3212, dismissing plaintiffs'<br />

complaint against defendant, Treadwell Corporation, with prejudice in this action, and there<br />

being no opposition thereto,<br />

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against<br />

defendant, Treadwell Corporation, be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and<br />

without costs.<br />

Dated: New York, New York<br />

'<br />

'<br />

Carol M. Ternpesta, Esq.<br />

Attorney for Defendant<br />

Treadwell Corporation<br />

MCGIWEY & UUGER, P.C.<br />

80 Broad Street-Suite 2300<br />

New York, New York 100<strong>04</strong><br />

(212) 509-3456<br />

700 Broadway<br />

New York, New York 10003


SUPREME coun OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK<br />

COUNlY OF NEW YON<br />

1N RE: NEW YORK COUNTY<br />

! NYCAL<br />

ASBESTOS LITIGATION<br />

I I.A.Y. Part 30<br />

(Heitler, J.)<br />

-A_"-.-<br />

THIS IIOCIJMENT RGKS m:<br />

ROSA M. MATTE, INDIVIDUALLY AND<br />

EXECUTRIX FOR THE ESTATE OF JOSEPH<br />

MATTE,<br />

-against-<br />

A. C. & S., INC., etul.,<br />

Plaintiffs,<br />

Index No.: 102 125/01<br />

NO OPPOSITION<br />

SUMMARY JUDGMENT<br />

MOTION AND ORDER<br />

--<br />

Defendants. :<br />

WHEREFORE, defendant, Treadwell Corporation, hereby requests summary judgment in<br />

the above entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules 5 3212, dismissing plaintiffs'<br />

complaint against defendant, Treadwell Corporation, with prejudice in this action, and there<br />

being no opposition thereto,<br />

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against<br />

defendant, Treadwell Corporation, be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and<br />

without costs.<br />

Dated: New York New York<br />

q/l ,20<strong>11</strong><br />

Attorney for Defendant<br />

Treadwell Corporation<br />

MCG~VNEY & KLUGER, P.C.<br />

80 Broad Street-Suite 2300<br />

New York, New York 100<strong>04</strong><br />

(212) 509-3456<br />

N0<strong>04</strong><strong>04</strong>78-I<br />

APR 1520<strong>11</strong>


_--I---__-<br />

SUPREME C‘OURI’OFT~IE STATE OFNEWYORK<br />

COUNTY OF NEW YORK<br />

-_I_cL<br />

IN RE: NEW YOKK COUNTY<br />

: NYCAI,<br />

ASBESTOS LITIGATION<br />

i I.A.S. Part 30<br />

-A<br />

-<br />

j (Heitler, J.)<br />

1’IJIS DOCUMENT FEFEXS TO:<br />

i Index No.: <strong>11</strong>938310&-)<br />

ANN LATTANZIO, INDIVIDUALLY AND AS<br />

107623/06<br />

PERSONAL REPRESENTATIVE FOR THE<br />

ESTATE OF GIOVANNI LATTANZIO,<br />

-against-<br />

A. C. & S., INC., et al.,<br />

Plaintiffs,<br />

NO OPPOSITION<br />

SUMMARY JUDGMENT<br />

MOTION AND ORDER<br />

-<br />

Defendants.<br />

i<br />

WHEREFORE, defendant, Oakfabco, Inc., hereby requests summary judgment in the<br />

above entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules 5 3212, dismissing plaintiffs’<br />

complaint against defendant, Oakfabco, Inc,, WW prejudice in this action, and there being no<br />

opposition thereto,<br />

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against<br />

defendant, Oakfabco, Inc., be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and without<br />

costs.<br />

Dated: New York, New York<br />

.1 I! ,20<strong>11</strong><br />

Robert Darish, Esq.<br />

Attorney for Defendant<br />

Oakfabco, Inc.<br />

MCGWNEY & KLUGER, P.C.<br />

SO Broad Street-Suite 2300<br />

New York, New York 100<br />

(2 12) 509-3456<br />

WEITZ & LUXENBERG, P.C.<br />

*”’<br />

700 Broadway<br />

York 10003 LPR 2 6<br />

SO ORDERED,<br />

N0<strong>04</strong><strong>04</strong>74-1


SIJI'REME COURT OF THE S7'ATE OF NEW YOKK<br />

COUNTY OF NEW YORK<br />

! NYCAL<br />

ASBESTOS LITIGATION<br />

i I.A.S. Part 30<br />

d j (Heitler, J.)<br />

nrIs DOCUMENT REFERS TO:<br />

i Index No.: <strong>11</strong>9383100-<br />

ANN LATTANZIO, INDIVIDUALLY AND AS<br />

107623/06<br />

PERSONAL REPRESENTATIVE FOR THE<br />

ESTATE OF GIOVANNI LATTANZXO,<br />

"-<br />

N RE: NEW YON couN'ry<br />

-against-<br />

A. C. & S., INC., et al.,<br />

i NO OPPOSITION<br />

Plain tiffs, j SUMMARY JUDGMENT<br />

i MOTION AND ORDER<br />

Defendants.<br />

j<br />

WHEREFORE, defendant, Treadwell Corporation, hereby requests summary judgment in<br />

the above entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules 5 3212, dismissing plaintiffs'<br />

complaint against defendant, Treadwell Corporation, with prejudice in this action, and there<br />

being no opposition thereto,<br />

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against<br />

defendant, Treadwell Corporation, be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and<br />

without costs.<br />

Dated: New York, New York<br />

4/\ ,20<strong>11</strong><br />

Carol M. Ternpesta,\Esq.<br />

Attorney for Defendant<br />

Treadwell Corporation<br />

MCGIVNEY & KLUGER, P.C.<br />

80 Broad Street-Suite 2300<br />

New York, New York 100<strong>04</strong><br />

(212) 509-3456 /$#{ ;t t'i 7y-7<br />

p, 1 r: ,' 'I-'.,: J-<br />

CWr+Pise;LERKS OFFICE'<br />

.I\<br />

N0<strong>04</strong><strong>04</strong>78-1<br />

APR 1520<strong>11</strong>


SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK<br />

COUNTY OF NEW YORK<br />

_1___________________l______l______r____------""----""-----------<br />

IN RE: NEW YORK CITY ASBESTOS LITIGATION<br />

_____________1______"-----------"-------------_-----------~------<br />

This Document Relates To:<br />

CARL KROGER and CAROL ANN KROGER,<br />

A.C. & S., INC., et al.,<br />

Plaintiff(s),<br />

-against-<br />

Defendants.<br />

X<br />

X<br />

* NYCAL<br />

1.A.S. Part 30<br />

: (Hon. Sherry Klein Heitler)<br />

' Index No.: 102314-01<br />

: NO-OPPOSITION SUMMARY<br />

' JUDGMENT MOTION AND<br />

: ORDER<br />

WHEREFORE, defendant CRANE CO. hereby requests summary judgment in the<br />

above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212, dismissing<br />

plaintiffs' complaint against defendant CRANE CO. with prejudice, and there being no<br />

opposition thereto,<br />

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against<br />

defendant CRANE CO. be, and the same are hereby, dismissed with prejudice and without costs,<br />

Dated:<br />

3 \3 e/\/<br />

Attorneys for Plaintiff(s)<br />

700 Broadway<br />

New Y ork, NY 10003<br />

(212) 558-5500<br />

599 Lexington Avenue<br />

(2 12) 536-3900<br />

SO ORDERED,<br />

Hon. Sherry Klein Heitler


SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YOU<br />

COUNTY OF NEW YORK<br />

W RE: NEW YORK COUNTY<br />

ASBESTOS LITIGATION<br />

I<br />

THIS DOCUMENT REFERS TO:<br />

ANTHONY MODAFFERI,<br />

4<br />

NYCAL<br />

I.A.S. Part 30<br />

(Heitler, J.)<br />

Index No.: 1 1 93 80/00 0<br />

102720/<br />

-against-<br />

A. C. & S., INC-, et al.,<br />

Plaintiffs, j NO OPPOSITION<br />

j SUMMARY JUDGMENT<br />

i MOTION ANI) ORDER<br />

Defendants. \<br />

WHEREFORE, defendant, Treadwell Corporation, hereby requests summary judgment in<br />

the above entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules 8 3212, dismissing plaintiffs'<br />

complaint against defendant, Treadwell Corporation, with prejudice in this action, and there<br />

being no opposition thereto,<br />

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against<br />

defendant, Treadwell Corporation, be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and<br />

without costs.<br />

Dated: New York, New York<br />

d/\ ,20<strong>11</strong><br />

Carol M. Ternpesta, Esq.<br />

Attorney for Defendant<br />

Treadwell Corporation<br />

MCGIVNEY & KLUGER, P.C.<br />

80 Broad Street-Suite 2300<br />

New York, New York 1000<br />

(212) 509-3456<br />

SO ORDERED,<br />

Anthony Modaffei<br />

WEITZ & LUXENBERG, P.C.<br />

York, New Y ork 10003<br />

12<br />

c<br />

kLbl


SIJPKEME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YOEX<br />

COUNTY --. "-- OF NEW YORK<br />

.-<br />

IN RE: NEW YOKK COUNTY<br />

! NYCAL<br />

ASBESTOS 1,<strong>11</strong>'1GATION I I.A.S. Part 30<br />

" j (Heitler, J.)<br />

THIS DOCUMENT REFERS TO:<br />

i Index No.: 103007/01<br />

EUGENE DEGANNES AND JACQUE1,NE<br />

DEGANNES,<br />

i NO OPPOSITION<br />

Plaintiffs, j SUMMARY JUDGMENT<br />

j MOTION AND ORDER<br />

-against-<br />

A. C. & S., INC., et al.,<br />

Defendants. !<br />

WHEREFORE, defendant, Courter & Company, Inc., hereby requests summary<br />

judgment in the above entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules 6 3212, dismissing<br />

plaintiffs' complaint against defendant, Courter & Company, Inc., with prejudice in this action,<br />

and there being no opposition thereto,<br />

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against<br />

defendant, Courter & Company, Inc., be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and<br />

without costs.<br />

Dated: New Yo&, New York<br />

Attorney for Defendant<br />

Courter & Company, Inc.<br />

MCGXVNEY & KLUGER, P.C.<br />

80 Broad Street-Suite 2300<br />

New Y ork, New Y ork 100<strong>04</strong><br />

(212) 509-3456<br />

Eugene Degannes and<br />

WEITZ & LUXENBERG, P.C.<br />

700 Broadway<br />

SO ORDERED,<br />

NOM<strong>04</strong>78- 1


___A-<br />

WPKEME COURT OF TIE S'I'ATE OF NEW YOKK<br />

ASBESTOS LI'I'IGA'1'ION<br />

THIS DOCUMENT REFERS TO:<br />

_.-_--<br />

EUGENE DEGANNES ANI1 JACQUELlNE<br />

DEGANNES,<br />

-against-<br />

Plaintiffs,<br />

i I.A.S. Part 30<br />

i (Heitler, J,)<br />

j Index No.: 103007/01<br />

! NO OPPOSITION<br />

i SUMMARY JUDGMENT<br />

; MOTION AND ORDER<br />

A. C. & S., INC., et al.,<br />

--_-<br />

Defendants.<br />

j<br />

WHEREFORE, defendant, Patterson Pump Co., hereby requests summary judgment i<br />

the above entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules 5 3212, dismissing plaintiffs'<br />

complaint against defendant, Patterson Pump Co., with prejudice in this action, and there being<br />

no opposition thereto,<br />

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against<br />

defendant, Patterson Pump Co., be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and without<br />

costs.<br />

Patterson Pump Co.<br />

MCGlWY & KLUGER, P.C.<br />

80 Broad Street-Suite 2300<br />

New York, New York 100<strong>04</strong><br />

(212) 509-3456<br />

SO ORDERED,<br />

Attorney for Plainti<br />

Eugene Degannes and Jacqueline Degannes<br />

WElTZ & LUXENBERG, P.C.<br />

700 Broadway<br />

bpR 2 6 20<strong>11</strong><br />

454-9572 NEVJ YORK<br />

'.<br />

N0<strong>04</strong><strong>04</strong>78-1<br />

sall


SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK<br />

-- CO‘IJNTY OF NEW YORK<br />

IN RE: NEW YOKK COUNTY<br />

i NYCAL<br />

ASBESTOS LITlGATTON<br />

i I.A.S. Part 30<br />

i (Heitler, 1.)<br />

THIS DOCUMENT REFERS TO:<br />

i Index No.: 103007/01<br />

EUGENE DEGANNES AND JACQUELINE<br />

DEGANNES,<br />

i NO OPPOSITION<br />

Plaintiffs,<br />

i SUMMARY JUDGMENT<br />

j MOTION AND ORDER<br />

-against-<br />

A. C. & S., INC., et al.,<br />

Defendants.<br />

i<br />

WHEREFORE, defendant, Treadwell Corporation, hereby requests summar! judgment in<br />

the above entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules 5 3212, dismissing plaintiffs’<br />

complaint against defendant, Treadwell Corporation, with prejudice in this action, and there<br />

being no opposition thereto,<br />

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against<br />

defendant, Treadwell Corporation, be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and<br />

without costs.<br />

Dated: New York, New York<br />

?/I , 201 1<br />

LdLaL<br />

Carol M. Tempesta, Esq.<br />

Attorney for Defendant<br />

Treadwell Corporation<br />

Eugene Degannes and Jacqueline Degannes<br />

MCGIVNEY & KLUGER, P.C.<br />

WEITZ & LUXENBERG, P.C.<br />

80 Broad Street-Suite 2300<br />

700 Broadway ;.<br />

New York, New York 100<strong>04</strong> New York, New York I O O e r’ Y*?<br />

(212) 509-3456 I*; A 8. ” I-i<br />

SO ORDERED, 2 6 20<strong>11</strong><br />

J 235-2549<br />

NEW yC.IflK<br />

COUNTY CLERK‘S OFFICE<br />

N0<strong>04</strong><strong>04</strong>78-1


I<br />

SUPREME COIJKI OF THE STATE OF NEW YON<br />

COUNTY - OF NEW YORK -----<br />

IN RE: NEW YON COUNTY<br />

ASBESTOS LITIGATION<br />

THIS DOCUMENT REFERS rro:<br />

-<br />

EUGENE DEGANNES AND JACQUELINE<br />

DEGANNES,<br />

-against-<br />

Plaintiffs,<br />

NYCAI,<br />

I.A.S. Part 30<br />

(Heitler, J.)<br />

Index No.: 103007/01<br />

NO OPPOSITION<br />

SUMMARY JUDGMENT<br />

MOTION AND OWER<br />

A. C. & S., INC., eta!.,<br />

Defendants.<br />

WHEREFORE, defendant, Tishman Liquidating Corp., hereby requests summary<br />

judgment in the above entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules 5 3212, dismissing<br />

plaintiffs' complaint against defendant, Tishan Liquidating Corp., with prejudice in this action,<br />

and there being no opposition thereto,<br />

ORDEW,D, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against<br />

defendant, Tishman Liquidating Corp., be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and<br />

without costs.<br />

80 Broad Street-Suite 2300<br />

New York, New York 1000<br />

(21 2) 509-3456<br />

SO ORDERED,<br />

Eugene Degannes and Jacqueline Degann$<br />

WEITZ & LUXENBERG, P.C.<br />

700 Broadway<br />

New York, New York IOOF<br />

2383-<strong>26</strong>37J.<br />

1 L E D<br />

APR 2 6 20<strong>11</strong><br />

141-<strong>11</strong>1 YORK<br />

CO~N r't' CLERK'S OFFICE<br />

NOMO474- I


-__I<br />

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK<br />

COUNTY OF NEW YON<br />

IN RE: NEW YORK COUNTY<br />

! NYCAL<br />

ASBESTOS LITIGATION I I.A.S. Part 30<br />

! (Heitler, J.)<br />

THIS DOCUMENT EFERS TO:<br />

j Index No.: 1036<strong>11</strong>/01<br />

MARY J. MARlEN, INDIVIDUALLY AND AS [<br />

EXECUTRIX FOR THE ESTATE OF WILLIAM i<br />

C. MARTIN, : NO OPPOSITION<br />

j SUMMARY JUDGMENT<br />

Plaintiffs, i MOTION AND ORDER<br />

-against-<br />

A. C. & S., INC., et al.,<br />

~-~<br />

Defendants. ;<br />

WHEREFORE, defendant, Treadwell Corporation, hereby requests summary judgment in<br />

the above entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules § 3212, dismissing plaintiffs'<br />

complaint against defendant, Treadwell Corporation, with prejudice in this action, and there<br />

being no opposition thereto,<br />

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against<br />

defendant, Treadwell Corporation, be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and<br />

without costs.<br />

Y<br />

Carol M. Tempesta, Esq.<br />

Attorney for Defendant<br />

Treadwell Corporation<br />

MCG~VNEY & KLUGER, P.C.<br />

80 Broad Street-Suite 2300<br />

New York, New York 100<strong>04</strong><br />

WEITZ & LUXENBERG, P.C<br />

700 Broadway<br />

New York, New York 10003<br />

(212) 509-3456 (212) 558-5500<br />

SO ORDERED,<br />

Hon. Sher? Khdn Heitler<br />

%&&i&X7<br />

~ P 2 R 6 20<strong>11</strong><br />

b!EW YORK<br />

CLERK'S OFFICE'


SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK<br />

COUNTY OF NEW YORK<br />

IN RE: NEW YORK CITY<br />

ASBESTOS LITIGATION<br />

This Document Relates to:<br />

MARY MARTIN, Individually and as Proposed<br />

Executrix for the Estate of WILLIAM C. MARTIN,<br />

I.A.S. Part 30<br />

(Heitler, J.)<br />

INDEX NO.: 01 -1 0361 1<br />

NO OPPOSITION<br />

SUMMARY JUDGMENT<br />

MOTION AND ORDER<br />

against<br />

A. C. AND S., INC., et ai.<br />

WHEREFORE, defendant, Kohler Co., hereby requests summary judgment in the<br />

3bove-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212, dismissing plaintiffs'<br />

:omplaint against defendant, Kohler Co., with prejudice, and there being no opposition thereto,<br />

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against<br />

lefendant, Kohler Co., be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and without costs.<br />

3ATED:<br />

New York, New York<br />

31 W <strong>11</strong><br />

ESQ.<br />

Y L 7'.<br />

;TEFHAkflEy BAKER, ESQ.<br />

MICHAEL FA~LLI,<br />

iOAGLAND, LONGO, MORAN<br />

WElTZ & LUXENBERG<br />

IUNST & DOUKAS, LLP<br />

Attorneys for Plaintiff (s),<br />

ittorneys for Defendant,<br />

Mary Martin, Individually and as Proposed<br />

Lohler Co.<br />

Executrix for the Estate of William C. Martin<br />

0 Paterson Street - PO Box 480<br />

700 Broadway<br />

lew Brunswick, New Jersey 08903 New York, NY 10,003 ,<br />

10 ORDERED:


-<br />

SUPREME c0uK-r OF THE STATE OF NEW YOKK<br />

COUNTY OF NEW YOKK<br />

IN RE: NEW YORK COUNTY j NYCAX,<br />

ASBESTOS LITIGATION<br />

j I.A.S. Part 30<br />

j (Heitler, J-)<br />

THIS DOCUMENT EEm-<br />

MARY MAKTTN, INDIVIDUALLY AND<br />

PROPOSED EXEC1JTR.IX FOR THE ESTATE<br />

OF WILLIAM C. MARTIN,<br />

P 1 ain ti ffs ,<br />

: Index No.: 10361 1/01<br />

i NO OPPOSITION<br />

i SUMMARY JUDGMENT<br />

j MOTION AND ORDER<br />

-against-<br />

A. C. & S., INC., et al.,<br />

Defendants.<br />

i<br />

WHEREFORE, defendant, Oakfabco, Inc., hereby requests summary judgment in the<br />

above entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules 5 3212, dismissing plaintiffs’<br />

complaint against defendant, Oakfabco, Inc., with prejudice in this action, and there being no<br />

opposition thereto,<br />

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against<br />

defendant, Oakfabco, Inc., be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and without<br />

costs.<br />

Dated: New York, New York<br />

,201 1<br />

Rabert Darish, Esq.<br />

Attorney for Defendant<br />

Oakfabco, Inc.<br />

Estate of William C. Ma<br />

MCGIVNEY & KLUGER, P.C.<br />

WEITZ & LUXENBERG, P.C.<br />

80 Broad Street-Suite 2300<br />

700 Broadway<br />

New York, New York 100<strong>04</strong> New York, New York 10003<br />

(2 I 2) 509-3456 (212) 558-5500<br />

VJEVJ<br />

FF\cE:<br />

SO ORDERED,<br />

Hon. Sherry Kleh Heitler 2571-0745<br />

N0<strong>04</strong><strong>04</strong>74- I


SUPREME COUR7 OF TFIE STATE OF NEW YOICK<br />

COUNTY OF NEW YOKK<br />

IN RE: NEW YORK comw<br />

NY C A I,<br />

ASBESTOS LlTlGATION<br />

I.A.S. Part 30<br />

(Heitler, J.)<br />

THIS DOCUMENT REFERS TO:<br />

ELEANOR F. HAKES, 1NDlVIDUALLY AND<br />

AS PERSONAL REPRESENTATIVE FOR THE<br />

ESTATE OF WlLLIAM V. HAKES <strong>11</strong>1,<br />

-against-<br />

A. C. & S., INC., et nL,<br />

Plaintiffs,<br />

Index No.: 103870/01<br />

NO OPPOSITION<br />

SlJMMARY JUDGMENT<br />

MOTION AND ORDER<br />

--<br />

Defendants.<br />

WHEREFORE, defendant, Tishman Liquidating Corp.,<br />

hereby requests summary<br />

judgment in the above entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules 5 3212, dismissing<br />

plaintiffs’ complaint against defendant, Tishman Liquidating Corp., with prejudice in this action,<br />

and there being no opposition thereto,<br />

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against<br />

defendant, Tishman Liquidating Cop, be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and<br />

without costs.<br />

80 Broad Street-Suite 2300<br />

New York, New Y ork 100<strong>04</strong><br />

(212) 509-3456<br />

Estate of William V. Hakes,<br />

WErTz & LUXENBERG, P.C.<br />

700 Broadway<br />

New York, New York I0003<br />

APR 2 6 20<strong>11</strong><br />

SO ORDERED,<br />

~;EW YORK<br />

zBaup CLERKS OFFICE<br />

N0<strong>04</strong><strong>04</strong>74- I


SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YOIiK<br />

COUNTY OF NEW YOKK<br />

IN E: NEW YORK COUNTY<br />

ASBESTOS LITIGATION<br />

THIS DOCUMENT REFERS TO:<br />

ELEANOR F. HAKES, INDIVIDUALLY AND<br />

AS PERSONAL R.EPRESENTATIVE FOR THE<br />

ESTATE OF WILLIAM V. HAKES, <strong>11</strong>1,<br />

-against-<br />

Plaintiffs,<br />

NY CAL<br />

I.A.S. Part 30<br />

(Hei tler, J.)<br />

hdex No.: 103870/01<br />

NO OPPOSITION<br />

SUMMARY JUDGMENT<br />

j MOTION AND ORDER<br />

I<br />

A. C. & S., INC., et ul.,<br />

Defendants. :<br />

WHEREFORE, defendant, Treadwell Corporation, hereby requests summary judgment in<br />

the above entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules 9 3212, dismissing plaintiffs'<br />

complaint against defendant, Treadwell Corporation, with prejudice in this action, and there<br />

being no opposition thereto,<br />

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against<br />

defendant, Treadwell Corporation, be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and<br />

without costs.<br />

Dated: New York. New York<br />

Attorney for Defendant<br />

Treadwell Corporation<br />

MCGIVNEY & UUGER, P.C.<br />

80 Broad Street-Suite 2300<br />

New York, New York 10<br />

(212) 509-3456<br />

SO ORDERED,<br />

Estate of William V. Hakes, I1<br />

WEITZ & LUXENBERG, P.C.<br />

700 Broadway<br />

New York, New York 10003<br />

123<br />

A@R 2 6 ?OE"<br />

\.lE!Al "ORK<br />

D<br />

#FI=


SUPREME: coum- OF THE sTAm OF NEW YORK<br />

COUNTY OF NEW YOKK<br />

IN RE: NEW YORK COUNTY<br />

”-. ---__<br />

i<br />

NYCAL<br />

ELEANOR F. HAKES, INDIVISUALLY AND<br />

PROPOSED REPRESENTATIVE FOR THE<br />

ESTATE OF WILLIAM V. HAKES, <strong>11</strong>1,<br />

-against-<br />

ASBESTOS LITIGATION j I.A.S. Part 30<br />

‘rrm DOCUMENT REFERS TO-<br />

i (Hcitler, J.)<br />

j Index No.: 103870/01<br />

i<br />

/ NO OPPOSITION<br />

i SUMMARY JUDGMENT<br />

Plaintiffs, j MOTION AND ORDER<br />

-.-<br />

A. C. & S., INC., et al.,<br />

Defendants.<br />

i<br />

WHEREFORE, defendant, Patterson Pump Co., here by requests summary judgment in<br />

the above entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules 0 3212, dismissing plaintiffs’<br />

complaint against defendant, Patterson Pump Co., with prejudice in this action, and there being<br />

no opposition thereto,<br />

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against<br />

defendant, Patterson Pump Co., be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and without<br />

costs.<br />

Dated: New York. New York<br />

Patterson Pump Co.<br />

MCGWY & KLUGER, P.C.<br />

80 Broad Street-Suite 2300<br />

New York, New York 100<strong>04</strong><br />

(2 12) 509-3456<br />

SO ORDERED,<br />

Estate of William V. Hakes, I<strong>11</strong><br />

WERZ & LUXENBERG, P.C.<br />

700 Broadway<br />

New York, New York 10003<br />

58-5500 APR 2 6 2Q“<br />

y0FiK<br />

Hon. Sherry Klein Heitler 454-<strong>04</strong>60 CLERKS<br />

COUNTY<br />

N0<strong>04</strong><strong>04</strong>78-I


~~<br />

SUPREME COURT OF THE S’I‘A‘TE OF NEW YOKK<br />

COUNTY OF NEW YORK<br />

IN RE: NEW YOKK COUNTY f NYCAL<br />

ASBESTOS LITIGATION<br />

i I.A.S. Part 30<br />

- ~ - -! (Heitler, J.)<br />

THlS DOCUMENT REFERS TO:<br />

ELEANOR F. HAKES, INDIVISUALLY AND<br />

PROPOSED REPRE,SENTATlVE FOR THE<br />

ESTATE OF WILLIAM V. HAKES, <strong>11</strong>1,<br />

-against-<br />

A. C. & S., INC., et al.,<br />

Plaintiffs,<br />

j Index No.: 103870/01<br />

j<br />

NO OPPOSITION<br />

j SUMMARY JUDGMENT<br />

i MOTION AND ORDER<br />

Defendants. ;<br />

WHEREFORE, defendant, Safeguard Industrial Equipment Co., hereby requests<br />

summary judgment in the above entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules 4 3212,<br />

dismissing plaintiffs’ complaint against defendant, Safeguard Industrial Equipment Co., with<br />

prejudice in this action, and there being no opposition thereto,<br />

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against<br />

defendant, Safeguard Industrial Equipment Co., be and the same are hereby dismissed with<br />

prejudice and without costs.<br />

Attorney for Defendant<br />

Safeguard Industrial Equipment Co.<br />

MCGIVNEY & KLUGER, P.C.<br />

80 Broad Street-Suite 2300<br />

New York, New York 100<strong>04</strong><br />

(2 12) 509-3456<br />

Estate of William V. Hakes,<br />

WEITZ & LUXENBERG, P.C.<br />

700 Broadway<br />

New York, New York 10003 ,pR 2 6 2015<br />

N”,W YORK<br />

OFF^^<br />

SO ORDERED, 7<br />

TY c E ~ ~ ~<br />

Hon. Sherry Klein Heitler<br />

3%!ldv<br />

N0<strong>04</strong><strong>04</strong>78-1


. ~ ~ I<br />

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK<br />

COUNTY OF NEW YORK<br />

_._- - ~ I<br />

IN RE: NEW YORK COUNTY<br />

i NYCAL<br />

ASBESTOS LITlGATION t I.A.S. Part 30<br />

--<br />

i (Heitler, 3.)<br />

THIS DOCUMENT REFERS TO:<br />

j Index No.: 103986/01<br />

AMELIA PARKER, INDIVIDUALLY AND AS I<br />

EXECUTRIX FOR THE ESTATE OF RICHARD i<br />

PARKER;<br />

NO OPPOSITION<br />

i SUMMARY JUDGMENT<br />

Plaintiffs, MOTION AND ORDER<br />

-against-<br />

A. C. & S., INC., etal.,<br />

Defendants.<br />

WHEREFORE!, defendant, Treadwell Corporation, hereby requests summary judgment in<br />

the above entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules 5 3212, dismissing plaintiffs’<br />

complaint against defendant, Treadwell Corporation, with prejudice in this action, and there<br />

being no opposition thereto,<br />

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against<br />

defendant, Treadwell Corporation, be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and<br />

without costs.<br />

Attorney for Defendant<br />

Treadwell Corporation ,<br />

MCGIVNEY & KLUGER, P.C.<br />

WEITZ & LUXENBERG, P.C.<br />

80 Broad Street-Suite 2300<br />

700 Broadway<br />

New York, New York 100<strong>04</strong> New York, New York 10003 APR ””<br />

(212) 509-3456 (212) 558-5500<br />

NEW YORK<br />

CLERK‘S OFF\CE<br />

SO ORDERED,<br />

cowfl<br />

1235-0803<br />

N0<strong>04</strong><strong>04</strong>78-1<br />

APR 15 20<strong>11</strong>


FRANK LUIS1 and HELEN LUISI,<br />

Plaintiffs,<br />

NYCAL<br />

I.A.S. Part 30<br />

Hon. Sherry Klein<br />

0<br />

Heitler, J.S.C.<br />

IndexNo.:<br />

1<strong>04</strong>0<strong>11</strong>-2<br />

NO OPPOSITION SUMMARY JUDGMENT<br />

MOTION AND ORDER<br />

WHEREFORE, defendant FOSTER WHEELER, L.L.C. (sued herein as "FOSTER WHEELER<br />

CORPORATION") hereby request summary judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil<br />

Practice Law and Rules Section 3212, dismissing plaintiffs' complaint against defendant FOSTER<br />

WHEELER, L.L.C, with prejudice, and there being no opposition thereto,<br />

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims-against defendant<br />

FOSTER WHEELER, L.L.C. be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and without costs.<br />

Weitz & Luxenberg, P.C.<br />

Attorney for Plain tvfs<br />

700 Broadway<br />

New York, New York 100<br />

Sedgwick, Detert, Moran & Arnold, LLP<br />

Attorneys for Foster Wheeler, 1. L.C.<br />

Three Gateway Center, 12th Floor<br />

Newark, NJ 07102<br />

50 ORDERED,<br />

-- '<br />

NJ/34 I760v 1


SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK<br />

- COUNTY OF NEW YORK<br />

IN RE: NEW YORK COUNTY<br />

i NYCAL<br />

ASBESTOS LITIGATION<br />

j I.A.S. Part 30<br />

i (Heitler, J.)<br />

0<br />

THIS DOCUMENT REFERS TO:<br />

j Index No.: <strong>11</strong>9382/0 <strong>04</strong>033/01<br />

CLARA M. LIGAMMARE, INDIVIDUALLY /<br />

AND AS EXECUTRIX FOR THE ESTATE OF I<br />

LAWRENCE LIGAMMARE, / NO OPPOSITION<br />

j SUMMARY JUDGMENT<br />

Plaintiffs, j MOTION AND ORDER<br />

-against-<br />

A. C. & S., INC., et al.,<br />

Defendants.<br />

j<br />

WHEREFORE, defendant, Treadwell Corporation, hereby requests summary judgment in<br />

the above entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules 5 3212, dismissing plaintiffs'<br />

complaint against defendant, Treadwell Corporation, with prejudice in this action, and there<br />

being no opposition thereto,<br />

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against<br />

defendant, Treadwell Corporation, be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and<br />

without costs.<br />

Dated: New Y rk, New York<br />

.S! ,20<strong>11</strong><br />

4 MLde<br />

Carol M. Tempesta, Esq.<br />

Attorney for Defendant<br />

Treadwell Corporation<br />

MCGIVNEY & KUJGER, P.C.<br />

80 Broad Street-Suite 2300<br />

New York, New York 100<strong>04</strong><br />

(212) 509-3456<br />

SO ORDERED,<br />

Estate of Lawrence Liga<br />

WEITZ & LUXENBERG, P.<br />

700 Broadway<br />

New York, New York 10003 APE 2 6 20<strong>11</strong><br />

t.@JG YORK<br />

GLERti'S OFFtCk<br />

w % o<br />

N0<strong>04</strong><strong>04</strong>78-I<br />

k-,: L<br />

6 15Zfi<strong>11</strong>I


SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK<br />

COUNTY OF NEW YORK<br />

IN RE: NEW YORK CITY<br />

ASBESTOS LITIGATION<br />

This Document Relates to:<br />

RANDEE KATLIN and WILLIAM L. GOLDMAN, as<br />

Co-Executors for the Estate of REUBEN W.<br />

GOLDMAN,<br />

I.A.S. Part 30<br />

(Heitler, J.)<br />

INDEX NO.: 01-1<strong>04</strong>560<br />

NO OPPOSITION<br />

SUMMARY JUDGMENT<br />

MOTION AND ORDER<br />

against<br />

A. C. AND S.. INC.. et al.<br />

WHEREFORE, defendant, Kohler Co., hereby requests summary judgment in the<br />

above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212, dismissing<br />

plaintiffs' complaint against defendant, Kohler Co., with prejudice, and there being no<br />

opposition thereto,<br />

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against<br />

defendant, Kohler Co., be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and without<br />

costs.<br />

DATED: New York, New York<br />

FILED<br />

APR 2 6 20<strong>11</strong><br />

HOAGLAFID, LONQO<br />

WAN, WNST 8<br />

DOUKAS, LLP<br />

ATTORNEYS AT LAW<br />

NORTH JERSEY<br />

40 PATERSON ST<br />

PO BOX rlao<br />

W BRUNSWICK, NJ<br />

SOUTH mSEY<br />

7M MTSEY'S MILL RD<br />

SUITE 202<br />

HAMONTON, NJ<br />

iOAGLAND, LONGO, MORAN<br />

NNST & DOUKAS, LLP<br />

4ttor neys for Defendant ,<br />

(ohler Co.<br />

40 Paterson Street - PO Box 480<br />

\lew Brunswick, New Jersey 08903<br />

$0 ORDERED:<br />

PAAN ALVARADO, ESQ.<br />

WElTZ & LUXENBERG<br />

Attorneys far Plaintiff (s),<br />

Randee Katlin and William L. Goldman as<br />

Co-Executors for the Estate of Reuben W.<br />

Goldman<br />

700 Broadway<br />

Hon. Sherry Klein Heitler


__I----<br />

SIJPREME COURT OF TH&@&TE<br />

"1. OF<br />

COUNTY OF NEW YORK<br />

.-I-~<br />

IN RE: NEW YORK COUNTY<br />

ASBESTOS 1,l'I'IGA'TION<br />

THIS DOCUMENT REFERS m:<br />

NEW YORK<br />

j NYCAL<br />

j I.A.S. Part 30<br />

(Heitler, J.><br />

i IndexNo.: 1<strong>04</strong>561/01<br />

CAROLE S. NICASTRO, AS<br />

ADMMIS'TRATRIX FOR THE ESTATE OF<br />

DENXS F. NICASTRO AND CAROLE S.<br />

! NO OPPOSITION<br />

NICASTRO, i SUMMARY JUDGMENT<br />

i MOTION AND OFtDER<br />

Plaintiffs,<br />

-against-<br />

A. C. & S., INC., et al.,<br />

Defendants. /<br />

i<br />

WHEREFORE, defendant, Treadwell Corporation, hereby requests summary judgment in<br />

the above entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules 8 3212, dismissing plaintiffs'<br />

complaint against defendant, Treadwell Corporation, with prejudice in this action, and there<br />

being no opposition thereto,<br />

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against<br />

defendant, Treadwell Corporation, be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and<br />

without costs.<br />

Dated: New York, New York<br />

201 1<br />

n,n<br />

Attorney for Defendant<br />

Treadwell Corporation<br />

MCGXVNEY & KLUGER, P.C.<br />

80 Broad Street-Suite 2300<br />

New York. New York 100<strong>04</strong><br />

(2 12) 509-3456<br />

SO ORDERED,<br />

Attorney for Plaintiffs<br />

Estate of Denis F. Nicastro<br />

WEITZ & LUXENBERG, P.C.<br />

FII<br />

700 Broadway APR 2 6 20<strong>11</strong><br />

NEW YWIK<br />

COUNTY CLERKS UFF1Ct<br />

1235- 1909<br />

N0<strong>04</strong><strong>04</strong>78-I<br />

I<br />

I


_I<br />

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK<br />

COUNTY OF NEW YORK<br />

_7-1_1-._-_L --<br />

m RE: NEW YORK com-ry<br />

ASBESTOS 1,ITIGATION<br />

__I-<br />

THIS DOCUMENT-ERS<br />

TO:<br />

CAROLE S. NICASTRO, AS<br />

ADMINISTRATRIX FOR THE ESTATE OF<br />

DENIS F. NICASTRO AND CAROLE S.<br />

NICASTRO,<br />

-against-<br />

A. C. & S., mC., et al.,<br />

Plaintiffs,<br />

-<br />

NYCAL<br />

I.A.S. Part 30<br />

(Heitler, J.)<br />

Index No.: 1<strong>04</strong>561/01<br />

NO OPPOSITION<br />

SUMMARY JUDGMENT<br />

MOTION AND ORDER<br />

Defendants.<br />

WHEREFORE, defendant, Oakfabco, Inc., hereby requests summary judgment in the<br />

above entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules 8 3212, dismissing plaintiffs’<br />

complaint against defendant, Oakfabco, Inc., with prejudice in this action, and there being no<br />

opposition thereto,<br />

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against<br />

defendant, Oakfabco, Inc., be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and without<br />

costs.<br />

Dated: New York, New York<br />

Darish, Esq.<br />

Attorney for Defendant<br />

Oakfabco, Inc.<br />

MCGIVNEY & KLUGER, P.C.<br />

80 Broad Street-Suite 2300<br />

New York, New York 100<strong>04</strong><br />

(212) 509-3456<br />

SO ORDERED,<br />

Fgm-4M-W= “.G :\<br />

Attorney for Plaintiffs<br />

Estate of Denis F. Nicastro F 1 L<br />

E<br />

WEITZ & LUXENBERG, P.C.<br />

700 Broadway<br />

New York,New York 10003 APR 2 6 20<strong>11</strong><br />

r , ~ u ~<br />

2571 -0749<br />

p:EW YORK<br />

1 ‘ CLERK‘S ~ OFFICE<br />

N0<strong>04</strong><strong>04</strong>74-1


I<br />

SUPREME COURT OF THE S'I'ATE OF NEW YORK<br />

_" COUNJ<br />

____.___<br />

Y OF NEW<br />

- __ YOKK -<br />

IN RE: NEW YORK COUNTY<br />

NYCXL<br />

I.A.S. Part 30<br />

--- _- -.<br />

.-<br />

(Heitler, J -><br />

THE DOCUMENT REFERS TO:<br />

ELOISE IIALL, INDIVIDUALLY AND AS<br />

ADMJNISIRATRIX FOK THE ESTATE RUFUS<br />

HALL,<br />

P tainti ffs,<br />

Index No.: 1<strong>04</strong>563/01<br />

NO OPPOSITION<br />

SUMMARY JUDGMENT<br />

MOTION AND ORDER<br />

-against-<br />

A. C. & S., INC., et al.,<br />

-<br />

Defendants.<br />

WHEREFORE, defendant, Safeguard Industrial Equipment Co., hereby requests<br />

summary judgment in the above entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules fj 3212,<br />

dismissing plaintiffs' complaint against defendant, Safeguard Industrial Equipment Co., with<br />

prejudice in this action, and there being no opposition thereto,<br />

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against<br />

defendant, Safeguard Industrial Equipment Co., be and the same are hereby dismissed with<br />

prejudice and without costs.<br />

P<br />

f 9 K h. o&b,E~.<br />

Attorney for Plaintiffs<br />

Safeguard Industrial Equipment Co.<br />

Estate Rufus Hall<br />

MCGIVNEY & UUGER, P.C.<br />

WEITZ & LUXENBERG,<br />

F*<br />

80 Broad Street-Suite 2300<br />

700Broadway<br />

New York, New York 100<strong>04</strong> New York, New York 10003<br />

(212) 509-3456<br />

SO ORDERED,<br />

I L E D<br />

APR 2 6 20<strong>11</strong><br />

3 2 W YaRK<br />

COUNTY CLERK'S OFFICE'<br />

N0<strong>04</strong><strong>04</strong>78-1


SUYRLME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW Y ORK<br />

."--__-<strong>11</strong>_<br />

COUNTY OF NEW YORK -__. _-- --<br />

IN E: NEW YORK COUNTY<br />

NYCAL<br />

ASBESTOS LITIGA'TION<br />

1.A.S. hrt 30<br />

(Heiller, 3.)<br />

THIS DOCUMENTREFERS TO:<br />

ELOISE HALL, 1NDlVIDUALLY AND AS<br />

ADMlNISTRA'rRIX FOR THE ESTATE RUFUS<br />

HALL,<br />

-against-<br />

A. C. & S., NC., et a].,<br />

--<br />

Plaintiffs,<br />

Defendants.<br />

Index No.: 1.<strong>04</strong>563/01<br />

NO OPPOSITION<br />

SUMMARY JUDGMENT<br />

NOTION AND OFWER<br />

WHEREFORE, defendant, Patterson Pump Co., hereby requests summary judgment in<br />

the above Entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules 5 3212, dismissing plaintiffs'<br />

complaint against defendant, Patterson Pump Co., with prejudice in this action, and there being<br />

no opposition thereto,<br />

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against<br />

defendant, Patterson Pump Co., be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and without<br />

costs.<br />

MCGlVNEY & KLUGER, P.C.<br />

80 Broad Street-Suite 2300<br />

New York, New York 100<strong>04</strong><br />

(212) 509-3456<br />

SO ORDERED,<br />

Attorney for Plainti<br />

Estate Rufus Hall<br />

WEITZ & LUXENBERG, P.C.<br />

700 Broadway<br />

NewYork,NewY rk 1 0<br />

F I'Am E 63<br />

COWN~<br />

APR 2.6$ 20<strong>11</strong><br />

P4 ?%% R K<br />

GERK'S OFFICE^<br />

330<strong>04</strong><strong>04</strong>78-3


SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE C)F NEW YORK<br />

- COUNTY OF NEW YORK<br />

IN RE: NEW YORK COUNTY<br />

! NYCAL<br />

ASBESTOS LITIGATION j I.A.S. Part 30<br />

i (Eleitler, J.)<br />

THIS DOCUMENT REFERS TO:<br />

j Index No.: 1<strong>04</strong>563/01<br />

ELOISE HALL, INDIVIDUALLY AND AS<br />

ADMINISTRATRIX FOR THE ESTATE RUFUS j<br />

HALL, i NO OPPOSITION<br />

j SUMMARY JUDGMENT<br />

Plaintiffs, : MOTION ANI) 0XU)ER<br />

-against-<br />

A. C. & S., INC7 et al.,<br />

Defendants.<br />

WHEREFORE, defendant, Treadwell Corporation, hereby requests summary judgment in<br />

the above entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules 4 3212, dismissing plaintiffs'<br />

complaint against defendant, Treadwell Corporation, with prejudice in this action, and there<br />

being no opposition thereto,<br />

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against<br />

defendant, Treadwell Corporation, be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and<br />

without costs.<br />

Attorney for Defendant<br />

Treadwell Corporation<br />

Estate Rufus Hall<br />

MCGIVNEY & KLUGER, P.C.<br />

80 Broad Street-Suite 2300<br />

WEITZ & LUXENBERG, P.C.<br />

700 Broadway<br />

Y York 100<strong>04</strong> New Y ork, New York 10003<br />

AFR 2 6 20<strong>11</strong><br />

Hon. Sherry -Klein Heitler


_I_- Defendants.<br />

_-I___<br />

SlJPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW Y ORK<br />

- COUNTY .- OF NEW YORK<br />

I.I_- -.”-<br />

IN RE: NEW YORK COUNTY<br />

i NYCAL<br />

ASBESTOS LITIGATION<br />

j I.A.S. Part 30<br />

_-<br />

! (Heitler, J.)<br />

THIS DOCUMEN-FERS TO:<br />

j Index No.: 1<strong>04</strong>563/01<br />

ELOISE HALL, INLIIVIDUALLY AND AS<br />

ADMINISTRATRIX FOR THE ESTATE OF<br />

RUFUS HALL, / NO OPPOSITION<br />

i SUMMARY JUDGMENT<br />

Plaintiffs,<br />

j MOTION AND ORDER<br />

-against-<br />

A. C. & S., INC., et al.,<br />

\<br />

WHEREFORE, defendant, Tishman Liquidating Coy., hereby requests summary<br />

judgment in the above entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules 6 3212, dismissing<br />

plaintiffs’ complaint against defendant, Tishman Liquidating Corp., with prejudice in this action,<br />

and there being no opposition thereto,<br />

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against<br />

defendant, Tishman Liquidating Corp., be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and<br />

without costs.<br />

MCGIVNEY & KLUGER, P.C.<br />

80 Broad Street-Suite 2300<br />

New York, New York 100<strong>04</strong><br />

(212) 509-3456<br />

SO ORDERE<br />

WEXTZ & LUXENBERG, P.C.<br />

700 Broadway<br />

&R 2 6 20<strong>11</strong><br />

New York, New York IO0<br />

1\IE\nJ YOFZK<br />

COuNn CLERKS OFFICE’<br />

2383-22764<br />

N0<strong>04</strong><strong>04</strong>74-1


SUPREME COUIIl OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK<br />

- COUNl’Y OF NEW YON<br />

IN RE: NEW YORK COUNTY<br />

i NYCAI,<br />

ASBESTOS LITIGATION<br />

j J.A.S. Part 30<br />

.I - d ! (Heitler, J.)<br />

THIS DOCUMENT REFERS TO:<br />

JOHN J. ROSATI, AS EXECUTOR FOR THE<br />

ESTATE OF JAMES V. ROSATI,<br />

-against-<br />

A. C. & S., INC., et a/.,<br />

i Index No.: 1<strong>04</strong>696/01<br />

!<br />

NO OPPOSITION<br />

Plaintiffs, j SUMMARY JUDGMENT<br />

j MOTION AND ORDER<br />

- --<br />

Defendants.<br />

j<br />

WHEREFORE, defendant, Oakfabco, lnc., hereby requests summary judgment in the<br />

above entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules 5 3212, dismissing plaintiffs’<br />

complaint against defendant, Oakfabco, Inc., with prejudice in this action, and there being no<br />

opposition thereto,<br />

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against<br />

defendant, Oakfabco, Inc., be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and without<br />

costs.<br />

Dated: New York, New York<br />

q(! ,20<strong>11</strong><br />

h<br />

Robert Darish, Esq.<br />

Attorney for Defendant<br />

Oakfabco, Inc.<br />

MCGIVNEY & KLUGER, P.C.<br />

80 Broad Street-Suite 2300<br />

New York, New York 100<strong>04</strong><br />

(212) 509-3456<br />

SO ORDERED,<br />

e.<br />

WElTZ & LUXENBERG, P.C.<br />

700 Broadway /hYR z6<br />

New York New York 10003<br />

(212) 558-5500<br />

2571-0751<br />

zag<br />

N0<strong>04</strong><strong>04</strong>74-1


SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK<br />

COUNTY OF NEW YORK<br />

IN RE: NEW YORK COUNTY<br />

i NYCAL<br />

ASBESTOS LITIGATION<br />

i I.A.S. Part 30<br />

i (Heitler, J.)<br />

THIS DOCUMENT REFERS TO:<br />

i Index No.: 1<strong>04</strong>696/01<br />

JOHN J. ROSATI, AS EXECUTOR FOR THE<br />

ESTATE OF JAMES V. ROSATI,<br />

NO OPPOSITION<br />

Plaintiffs, i SUMMARY JUDGMENT<br />

MOTION AND ORDER<br />

-against-<br />

A. C. & S., INC., et al.,<br />

Defendants.<br />

i<br />

WHEREFORE, defendant, Safeguard Industrial Equipment Co., hereby r,,-ests<br />

summary judgment in the above entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules 8 3212,<br />

dismissing plaintiffs’ complaint against defendant, Safeguard Industrial Equipment Co., with<br />

prejudice in this action, and there being no opposition thereto,<br />

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against<br />

defendant, Safeguard Industrial Equipment Co., be and the same are hereby dismissed with<br />

prejudice and without costs.<br />

Safeguard Industrial Equipment Co.<br />

MCGIVNEY & KLUGER, P.C.<br />

80 Broad Street-Suite 2300<br />

New York, New York 100<strong>04</strong><br />

(212) 509-3456<br />

SO ORDERED,<br />

Hon. Sherry Jdein Heitler<br />

Estate of James V, Rosati<br />

WEITZ & LUXENBERG, P.C.<br />

700 Broadway<br />

New York, New York 10003<br />

-*% -!<br />

%’<br />

FILED<br />

APR 2 6 20<strong>11</strong><br />

EW YORK<br />

N0<strong>04</strong>Q478-1


SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK<br />

COUNlY OF NEW YORK<br />

IN RE: NEW YON COUNTY i NYCAL<br />

ASBESTOS LITIGATION f I.A.S. Part 30<br />

d ! OIeitler, J.)<br />

THIS DOCUMENT REFERS pro:<br />

j Index No.: 1<strong>04</strong>696/01<br />

JOHN J. ROSATI, AS EXECUTOR FOR THE<br />

ESTATE OF JAMES V. ROSATX,<br />

\ NO OPPOSITION<br />

Plaintiffs, i SUMMARY JUDGMENT<br />

/ MOTION AND ORDER<br />

-against-<br />

A. C. & S., INC., et al.,<br />

Defendants. j I<br />

WHEREFORE, defendant, Treadwell Corporation, hereby requests summary judgment in<br />

the above entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Q 3212, dismissing plaintiffs'<br />

complaint against defendant, Treadwell Corporation, with prejudice in this action, and there<br />

being no opposition thereto,<br />

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against<br />

defendant, Treadwell Corporation, be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and<br />

without costs.<br />

Dated: New York, Wew York<br />

Carol M. Ternpesta, Esq?<br />

Attorney for Defendant<br />

Treadwell Corporation<br />

MCGNNEY & KLUGER, P.C.<br />

80 Broad Street-Suite 2300<br />

New York, New York 100<strong>04</strong><br />

(212) 509-3456<br />

SO ORDERED,<br />

P-v Y I ,<br />

Lttome9or P<br />

Estate of James V. Rosati<br />

WEITZ & LUXENBERG, P.C.<br />

700 Broadway<br />

APR 2 6 20''


SUPREME CO1JRT OF 'TIE S'I'ATF OF NEW YORK<br />

ASBES'I'OS LITIGA'X'ION i I.A.S. Part 30<br />

.,- -------<br />

THIS DOCUMENl REFERS TO:<br />

! (Hcitler, J.)<br />

1<br />

j Index No.: 1<strong>04</strong>982/01<br />

ROBERT B. GAGLJARDO AND BARBARA<br />

GAGLIARDO,<br />

-against-<br />

Plaintiffs,<br />

NO OPPOSITION<br />

i SUMMARY JUDGMENT<br />

j MOTION AND ORDER<br />

A. C. & S., INC., et al.,<br />

Defendants.<br />

i<br />

WHEREFORE, defendant, Tishman Liquidating Corp., hereby requests summary<br />

judgment in the above entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules $ 3212, dismissing<br />

plaintiffs' complaint against defendant, Tishman Liquidating Corp., with prejudice in this action,<br />

and there being no opposition thereto,<br />

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against<br />

defendant, Tishman Liquidating Corp., be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and<br />

without costs.<br />

MCGNNEY & KLWGER, P.C.<br />

80 Broad Street-Suite 2300<br />

New York, New York 100<strong>04</strong><br />

(212) 509-3454<br />

SO ORDERED,<br />

WEITZ & LUXENBERG. P.C.<br />

700 Broadway<br />

New York, New York 10003<br />

2383-2272<br />

A&?<br />

23 mt<br />

N0<strong>04</strong><strong>04</strong>74-1


SIJPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK<br />

~- COUNTY OF NEW YORK<br />

IN KE: NEW YORK COUNTY<br />

j NYCAL<br />

ASBESTOS LITIGATION<br />

j 1.A.S. Part 30<br />

! (Heitler, 1.)<br />

THIS DOCUMENT REFERS TO:<br />

_-<br />

j Index No.: 1<strong>04</strong>982/01<br />

ROBERT B. GAGLIARDO AND BARBARA<br />

GAGLIARDO,<br />

NO OPPOSITION<br />

Plaintiffs, j SUMMARY JUDGMENT<br />

i MOTION AND ORDER<br />

-against-<br />

A. C. & S., INC., et al.,<br />

j<br />

Defendants. - i<br />

WHEREFOE, defendant, Treadwell Corporation, hereby requests summary judgment in<br />

the above entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules 5 3212, dismissing plaintiffs'<br />

complaint against defendant, Treadwell Corporation, with prejudice in this action, and there<br />

being no opposition thereto,<br />

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against<br />

defendant, Treadwell Corporation, be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and<br />

without costs.<br />

Dated: New Yo k, New York<br />

d, ,20<strong>11</strong><br />

J?yb.dJ&/w>j . J<br />

Carol M. Tempesta, Esq.<br />

Attorney for Defendant<br />

Treadwell Corporation<br />

P-<br />

Robert B. Gagliardo and Bar<br />

WElTZ & LUXENBERG, P.C.<br />

700 Broadway<br />

MCGIVNEY & KLUGER, P.C.<br />

80 Broad Street-Suite 2300<br />

New York, New York 100<strong>04</strong> New York, New York 10003<br />

(212) 509-3456 (212) 558-5500<br />

SO ORDERED,<br />

APK 2 6 20<strong>11</strong><br />

NEW YORK<br />

CLERK'S OFFICE<br />

N0<strong>04</strong><strong>04</strong>78-1


_cI<br />

SlJPKEME COURT OF THE S1’Al’E OF NEW YOKK<br />

ASBESTOS LITIGATION j I.A.S. Part 30<br />

I (Heitler. J.)<br />

--A‘ I ,<br />

TMJS DOCUMENT REFERS TO:<br />

i Index No.: 1<strong>04</strong>982/01<br />

ROBERT B. GAGLIARDO AND BAmARA i<br />

GAGLIARDO,<br />

NO OPPOSITJON<br />

Plaintiffs, j SUMMARY JUDGMENT<br />

j MOTION AND ORDER<br />

-against-<br />

A. C. & S., NC., et ul,,<br />

--<br />

Defendants. i<br />

WHEREFORE, defendant, Courter & Company, Inc., hereby request<br />

summary<br />

judgment in the above entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules 8 3212, dismissing<br />

plaintiffs’ complaint against defendant, Courter & Company, Inc., with prejudice in this action,<br />

and there being no opposition thereto,<br />

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against<br />

defendant, Courter & Company, Inc., be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and<br />

without costs.<br />

Attorney for Defendant<br />

Attorney for Plaintiffs<br />

Courter & Company, Inc.<br />

MCGlWY & KLUGER, P.C.<br />

WEITZ & LUXENBERG, P.C.<br />

80 Broad Street-Suite 2300<br />

700 Broadway<br />

New York, New York 100<strong>04</strong><br />

NewYork,NewYork10003 APR 2 6 20<strong>11</strong><br />

(212) 509-3456 (7.12) 558-5500<br />

SO ORDERED,<br />

Robert B. Gagliardo and B FiGkiaE D<br />

NEW YORK<br />

COUNTY CLERK‘S OFFICJ$<br />

<strong>11</strong>22-12564<br />

N0<strong>04</strong><strong>04</strong>78-1


~ -._-<br />

SUPREME COlJRT OF THE STAI’E OF NEW YORK<br />

COIJNTY OF NEW - YORK ---<br />

IN E: NEW YOKK COUNTY i NYCAL,<br />

AS HESTOS LIT1 GAT1 ON<br />

i I.A.S. Part 30<br />

i (Heitler, J.)<br />

r ,<br />

THIS DOCUMENT REFERS TO:<br />

i Index No.: 1<strong>04</strong>982/01<br />

ROBERT B. GAGLIARDO AND BARBARA<br />

f<br />

GAGLIARDO,<br />

NO OPPOSITION<br />

Plaintiffs,<br />

i SUMMARY JUDGMENT<br />

[ MOTION AND ORDER<br />

-against-<br />

” .--_<br />

A. C. & S., INC., et al.,<br />

Defendants. - i<br />

WHEREFORE, defendant, Patterson Pump Co., hereby requests summary idgmmt in<br />

the above entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules tj 3212, dismissing plaintiffs’<br />

complaint against defendant, Patterson Pump Co., with prejudice in this action, and there being<br />

no opposition thereto,<br />

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against<br />

rlA~--~,,n+ Patterson Pump Co., be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and without<br />

costs.<br />

York, New York


I<br />

SIJPKEME couu OF THE STATE OF NEW YOKK<br />

COUNTY ..-- OF "_- NEW YON<br />

-_--<br />

IN RE: NEW YORK COUNTY<br />

i NYCAL<br />

A SBES'T'OS LITIGATION i 1.A.S. Part 30<br />

i (Eieitler, J.)<br />

-<br />

.<br />

THIS DOCUMENT REFERS TO:<br />

/ Index No.: 1<strong>04</strong>982/01<br />

ROBERT B. GAGLIARDO AND BAEU3ARn<br />

i<br />

GAGE1 AKDO,<br />

! NO OPPOSITION<br />

Plaintiffs,<br />

i SUMMARY JUDGMENT<br />

; MOTION AND ORDER<br />

-against-<br />

-.<br />

A. C. & S., NC., et af.,<br />

Defendants.<br />

I<br />

W€3EREFORE, defendant, Safeguard Industrial Equipment Co., hereby<br />

:q1 :sts<br />

I summary judgment-in the above entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules tj 3212,<br />

dismissing plaintiffs' complaint against defendant, Safeguard Industrial Equipment Co., with<br />

prejudice in this action, and there being no opposition thereto,<br />

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against<br />

defendant, Safeguard Industrial Equipment Co., be and the same are hereby dismissed with<br />

prejudice and without costs.<br />

Safeguard Industrial Equipment Co.<br />

MCG~WJEY & UUGER, P.C.<br />

80 Broad Street-Suite 2300<br />

New York, New York 100<strong>04</strong><br />

(212) 509-3456<br />

Robert B. Gagliardo and Barbara Gagliardo<br />

WEITZ & LUXENBERG, P.C.<br />

700 Broadway<br />

New Y ork, New Y ork 1 Ow3 9<br />

(212) 558-5500


SUPREME COUR'T OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK<br />

COUNTY OF NEW YORK<br />

IN RE: NEW YORK cowry<br />

I_<br />

ASBESTOS LITIGATION<br />

THIS DOCUMENT REFERS TO:<br />

FRANCIS 3. LANGAN AND ELIZABETH M.<br />

LANGAN,<br />

-against-<br />

A. C. & S., INC., et al.,<br />

! NYCAL<br />

i I.A.S. Part 30<br />

i (Heitler, J.)<br />

i Index No.: 1<strong>04</strong>997/0 1<br />

i<br />

\ NO OPPOSITION<br />

Plaintiffs, j SUMMARY JUDGMENT<br />

i MOTION AND ORDER<br />

Defendants.<br />

i<br />

WHEREFORE, defendant, Treadwell Corporation, hereby requests summary judgment in<br />

the above entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules 5 3212, dismissing plaintiffs'<br />

complaint against defendant, Treadwell Corporation, with prejudice in this action, and there<br />

being no opposition thereto,<br />

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against<br />

defendant, Treadwell Corporation, be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and<br />

without costs.<br />

Attorney for Defendant<br />

Treadwell Corporation<br />

MCGIVNEY & KLUGER, P.C.<br />

80 Broad Street-Suite 2300<br />

New York, New York 100<strong>04</strong><br />

(21 2) 509-3456<br />

WEITZ & LUXENBERG, P.C.<br />

700 Broadway<br />

New York, New York 10003<br />

bpi{ 2 6 2<strong>04</strong>1<br />

SO ORDERED,<br />

1235-6986 couNn<br />

p$hY \;OM<br />

CLERK'S OFFICE<br />

N0<strong>04</strong><strong>04</strong>78-1


SIJPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YOKK<br />

comw OF NEW YON<br />

---- ----<br />

IN I=:<br />

NEW YORK COUNT7<br />

ASBESTOS LITIGATION<br />

-r HI s DOC~ JMXT-KEFERS TO :<br />

-.<br />

----<br />

JOHN PAUL KEITH AND DOROTHY KEITH,<br />

! NYCAI,<br />

j I.A.S. Part 30<br />

i (Heitler, J.)<br />

j Index No.: 105230/01<br />

!<br />

-against-<br />

A. C. & S., INC., et ai.,<br />

Plain tiffs,<br />

Defendants.<br />

! NO OPPOSITION<br />

j SUMMARY JUDGMENT<br />

j MOTION AND ORDER<br />

i<br />

WHEREFORE, defendant, Patterson Pump Co., hereby requests summary judgment in<br />

the above entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules § 3212, dismissing plaintiffs'<br />

complaint against defendant, Patterson Pump Co., with prejudice in this action, and there being<br />

no opposition thereto,<br />

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against<br />

defendant, Patterson Pump Co., be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and without<br />

costs.<br />

Dated: New York. New York<br />

Patterson Pump Co.<br />

MCGIVNEY & KLUGER, P.C.<br />

80 Broad Street-Suite 2300<br />

New York, New York 100<strong>04</strong><br />

(212) 509-3456<br />

SO ORDERED,<br />

John Paul Keith and Dorothy Keith<br />

WElTZ & LUXENBERG, P.C.<br />

FILED<br />

APR 2 6 2 W<br />

NO<strong>04</strong><strong>04</strong>78-1


(2<br />

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK<br />

COUNTY OF NEW YORK<br />

JOHN PAUL KEITH and DOROTHY KEITH,<br />

A.C. & S., INC., et a].,<br />

Plaintiff(s),<br />

: NYCAL<br />

: I.A.S. Part 30<br />

: (Hon. Sherry Klein Heitler)<br />

-against-<br />

: Index No.: 105230-01<br />

Defendants.<br />

NO-OPPOSITION SUMMARY<br />

JUDGMENT MOTION AND<br />

: ORDER<br />

WHEREFORE, defendant CRANE CO. hereby requests summary judgment in the<br />

above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212, dismissing<br />

plaintiffs' complaint against defendant CRANE CO. with prejudice, and there being no<br />

opposition thereto,<br />

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against<br />

defendant CRANE CO. be, and the same are hereby, dismissed with prejudice and without costs.<br />

Dated: '3 \? =\ (\<br />

Attorneys for Plaintiff(s)<br />

700 Broadway CRANE CO.<br />

New York, NY 10003 599LexingtonAvenue APR 2 6 20<strong>11</strong><br />

(212) 558-5500<br />

New York, NY 10022<br />

--"+_. ~ 12) 536-3900 NEW YORK<br />

r.ouN1~ CLERKS OFF'=<br />

SO ORDERED,<br />

Hon. Sherry Klein Heitler<br />

APR 15 20<strong>11</strong>1


SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YON<br />

r~<br />

I- COUNTY OF NEW YORK<br />

RE: NEWTOM COUNTY<br />

! NYCAL<br />

ASBESTOS LITIGATION<br />

j I.A.S. Part 30<br />

i (Heitler, J.)<br />

THIS DOCUMENT REFERS TO:<br />

j Index No.: 105252/01<br />

ELIZABETH A. WHITEHEAD, AS<br />

ADMINISTRATRIX FOR THE ESTATE OF<br />

CHARLES E. MEYERS, \ NO OPPOSITION<br />

j SUMMARY JUDGMENT<br />

Plaintiffs, MOTION AND ORDER<br />

-against-<br />

A. C. & S., INC., et al.,<br />

-.-<br />

Defendants.<br />

i<br />

WHEREFORE, defendant, Treadwell Corporation, hereby requests summary judgment in<br />

the above entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules 8 3212, dismissing plaintiffs'<br />

complaint against defendant, Treadwell Corporation, with prejudice in this action, and there<br />

being no opposition thereto,<br />

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against<br />

defendant, Treadwell Corporation, be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and<br />

without costs.<br />

F I L E Q<br />

Treadwell Corporation<br />

Estate of Charles E. Meyers<br />

MCG~VNEY & KLUGER, P.C. WEITZ&LWXENBERG,P.C.<br />

.1<br />

80 Broad Street-Suite 2300<br />

700 Broadway<br />

New York, New York 100<strong>04</strong><br />

New York, New York 10003<br />

(212) 509-3456 (212) 558-5500<br />

APR 2 6 2012<br />

SO ORDERED,<br />

123GQW<br />

PIEW YORK<br />

~y CLERK'S aFF6b<br />

N0<strong>04</strong><strong>04</strong>78-1<br />

I<br />

I<br />

1


SUPREME COlJKT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK<br />

COUNTY OF NEW YORK<br />

IN RE: NEW YORK COUNTY j NYCAL<br />

ASBESTOS LITIGATION<br />

i lAS+ Part 30<br />

A j (Heitler, J.)<br />

THIS DOCUMENT REFERST<br />

ELIZABETH A. WHITEHEAD, AS<br />

ADMINISTRATRIX FOR THE ESTATE OF<br />

CHARLES E. MEYERS,<br />

-against-<br />

A. C. & S., INC., et ul.,<br />

PI ainti ffs,<br />

j Index No.: 105252/01<br />

; NO OPPOSITION<br />

j SUMMARY JUDGMENT<br />

! MOTION AND ORDER<br />

Defendants.<br />

j<br />

WHEREFORE, defendant, Oakfabco, Inc., hereby requests summary judgment in the<br />

above entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules 5 3212, dismissing plaintiffs’<br />

complaint against defendant, Oakfabco, Inc., with prejudice in this action, and there being no<br />

opposition thereto,<br />

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against<br />

defendant, Oakfabco, Inc., be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and without<br />

costs.<br />

Dated: New Yprk, New York<br />

Attorney for Defendant<br />

Oakfabco, Inc.<br />

MCGlVNEY & KLUGER, P.C.<br />

80 Broad Street-Suite 2300<br />

New York, New York 100<strong>04</strong><br />

(212) 509-3456<br />

Estate of Charles E. Meyers<br />

WEITZ & LUXENBERG, P.C.<br />

700 Broadway<br />

SO ORDERED,<br />

N0<strong>04</strong><strong>04</strong>74-1


_I____<br />

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK<br />

COUNTY OF NEW YORK -----<br />

IN RE: NEW YORK COUNTY<br />

j NYCAL<br />

ASBESTOS LITIGATION<br />

j I.A.S. Part 30<br />

i (Heitler, J.)<br />

THIS DOCUMENT REFERS TO:<br />

SHARON B. HARVEY, INDIVIDUALLY AND<br />

ADMINISTRATRIX FOR THE ESTATE OF<br />

RICHARD L. HARVEY,<br />

-against-<br />

A. C. & S., INC., et al.,<br />

Plaintiffs,<br />

-<br />

i index No.: 105477/01<br />

i<br />

i<br />

NO OPPOSITION<br />

i SUMMARY JUDGMENT<br />

! MOTION AND ORDER<br />

Defendants.<br />

i<br />

WHEFEFORE, defendant, Treadwell Corporation, hereby requests summary judgment in<br />

the above entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules $ 3212, dismissing plaintiffs'<br />

complaint against defendant, Treadwell Corporation, with prejudice in this action, and there<br />

being no opposition thereto,<br />

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against<br />

defendant, Treadwell Corporation, be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and<br />

without costs.<br />

Dated: New Y rk, New York<br />

J! ,20<strong>11</strong><br />

1 f!AJ&Q+><br />

Carol M. Tempesta, Esq.<br />

Attorney for Defendant<br />

Treadwell Corporation<br />

MCGIWY & KLUGER, P.C.<br />

80 Broad Street-Suite 2300<br />

New York, New York 100<strong>04</strong><br />

(212) 509-3456<br />

SO ORDEED,<br />

Estate of Richard L. Harvey<br />

WEITZ & LUXENBERG, P.C.<br />

700 Broadway<br />

New York, New York 10003<br />

APR 2 6 20<strong>11</strong><br />

FILED<br />

NESJ YORK<br />

&m CLERK'S OFFICE<br />

N0<strong>04</strong><strong>04</strong>78- 1


SUPREME c0uR-r OF THE STATE OF NUW YORK<br />

COUNTY ~-~-- OF NEW -- YORK<br />

-. -._--<br />

IN RE: NEW YORK COUNTY<br />

! NYCAL<br />

ASBESTOS LITIGATION<br />

I I.A.S. Part 30<br />

i (Heitler, J.)<br />

‘THIS DOCUMEN’I’ REFERS TO:<br />

j Index No.: 105477/01<br />

FRANK KOROSECZ, AS ADMINISTRATOR !<br />

FOR THE ESTATE OF ETHEL N. KOROSECZ j<br />

AND FRANK KOROSECZ, INDIVIDUALLY, i NO OPPOSITION<br />

j SUMMARY JUDGMENT<br />

Plaintiffs, \ MOTION AND ORDER<br />

. 4<br />

-against-<br />

A. C. & S., INC., el ai.,<br />

Defendants. !<br />

WHEREFORE, defendant, Safeguard Industrial Equipment Co., hereby requests<br />

summary judgment in the above entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules 3212,<br />

dismissing plaintiffs’ complaint against defendant, Safeguard Industrial Equipment Co., with<br />

prejudice in this action, and there being no opposition thereto,<br />

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against<br />

defendant, Safeguard Industrial Equipment Co., be and the same are hereby dismissed with<br />

prejudice and without costs.<br />

FWY n.w2, E<br />

F<br />

”i.<br />

ED<br />

Attorney for Plaintiffs<br />

Safeguard Industrial Equipment Co.<br />

Estate of Ethel N. Korosec<br />

MCGXVNEY & KLUGER, P.C.<br />

WElTZ & LUXENBERG, P.C.<br />

80 Broad Street-Suite 2300<br />

700 Broadway<br />

New York, New Y ork 100<strong>04</strong> New York, New York 10003 APR 2 6 20’’<br />

N0<strong>04</strong><strong>04</strong>78- 1


SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK<br />

coumy OF NEW YORK<br />

1N RE: NEW YORK COUNTY<br />

! NYCAL<br />

ASBESTOS LITIGATION<br />

j I.A.S. Part 30<br />

/ (Heitler, J.)<br />

THIS DOCUMENT REFERS TO:<br />

j Index No.: 105477/01<br />

FRANK KOROSECZ, AS ADMINISTRATOR i<br />

FOR THE ESTATE OF ETHEL N. KOROSECZ j<br />

AND FRANK KOROSECZ, INDIVIDUALLY, NO OPPOSITION<br />

i SUMMARY JUDGMENT<br />

Plaintiffs, i MOTION AND OmER<br />

-against-<br />

A. C. & S., INC., et a].,<br />

Defendants.<br />

j<br />

WHEREFORE, defendant, Treadwell Corporation, hereby requests summary judgment in<br />

the above entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules 5 3212, dismissing plaintiffs’<br />

complaint against defendant, Treadwell Corporation, with prejudice in this action, and there<br />

being no opposition thereto,<br />

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against<br />

defendant, Treadwell Corporation, be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and<br />

without costs.<br />

Dated: New Y rk, New York<br />

d, ,20<strong>11</strong><br />

~ ~~~<br />

Carol M. Ternpesta, Esq.<br />

Attorney for Defendant ~<br />

Tread we1 1 Corporation<br />

MCGIVNEY & KLUGER, P.C.<br />

WElrz & LUXENBERG, P.C.<br />

I<br />

SO Broad Street-Suite 2300<br />

700 Broadway<br />

New York, New York 100<strong>04</strong> New York, New York 10003 APR 6 20<strong>11</strong><br />

(212) 509-3456<br />

(212) 558-5500<br />

SO ORDERED,<br />

Hon. Sherry Klein Heitler<br />

p.\T$ YORK<br />

OFFGE<br />

Tu CLERKS<br />

J W M<br />

N0<strong>04</strong><strong>04</strong>78-1


This Document Relates To:<br />

NYCAL<br />

1,A.S. Part 30<br />

(Heitler, J.)<br />

NO OPPOSITION SUMMARY<br />

JUDGMENT MOTION AND<br />

ORDER<br />

-<br />

Index No.:%5885/2001 )<br />

106037/200 1<br />

WHEREFORE, defendant SEQUOIA VENTURES NC. f/k/a BECHTEL CORP.,<br />

hereby requests summary judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law anc<br />

Rules Section 32 12, dismissing plaintiffs complaint against defendant SEQUOIA VENTURES<br />

INC. f/Wa BECHTEL CORP., with prejudice, and there being no opposition thereto,<br />

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against<br />

defendant SEQUOIA VENTURES INC. f/Wa BECHTEL CORP., be and the same are hereby<br />

dismissed with prejudice and without costs.<br />

Dated: New York, New York<br />

FILED<br />

WILENTZ, GOLDMAN & SPITZER<br />

RSI BALLAINE & FORD P.C.<br />

NEW YORK<br />

<strong>11</strong>0 William Street, <strong>26</strong>th Floor<br />

New York, New York 10038-3901<br />

(212) <strong>26</strong>7-3828<br />

Attorneys for Defendant<br />

SEQUOIA VENTURES INC.<br />

f/Wa BECHTEL CORP.<br />

120 Broadway, 27th Floor<br />

New York, New York 10271 -0079<br />

(212) 238-4800<br />

So Ordered:<br />

.::ODMA/PCDOCS/DOCSNY/5 15750/1<br />

APR 13 20<strong>11</strong> '


NYCAL<br />

I.A.S. Part 30<br />

(Heitler, J.)<br />

This Document Relates To:<br />

NO OPPOSITION SUMMARY<br />

JUDGMENT MOTION AND<br />

ORDER<br />

WHEREFORE, defendant SEQUOIA VENTURES INC, fMa BECHTEL CORP.,<br />

hereby requests summary judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and<br />

Rules Section 3212, dismissing plaintiffs complaint against defendant SEQUOIA VENTURES<br />

INC. fMa BECHTEL CORP., with prejudice, and there being no opposition thereto,<br />

. ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against<br />

defendant SEQUOIA VENTURES INC, fMa BECHTEL CORP., be and the same are hereby<br />

dismissed with prejudice and without costs,<br />

Dated: New York, New York<br />

E D*<br />

WILENTZ, GOLDMAN & SPITZER<br />

J~NDM~%?QRSI BALLAINE & FORD P.C.<br />

1 10 William Street, <strong>26</strong>th Floor<br />

New York, New York 10038-390 1<br />

(212) <strong>26</strong>7-3828<br />

C-S. Kozak<br />

Attorneys for Defendant<br />

SEQUOIA VENTURES INC.<br />

f/k/a BECHTEL COW.<br />

120 Broadway, 27th Floor<br />

New York, New York 10271 -0079<br />

(212) 238-4800<br />

_"_*~,"._,l,.." __. *,.,* I..X,..<br />

SO Ordered:<br />

Hon. Sherry Kl&n Heitler<br />

.::ODMA/PCDOCS/DOCSNY/S 15750/1


SlJPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK<br />

- COUNTY OF NEW YORK -<br />

cc_<br />

1N RE: NEW YORK COUNTY<br />

i NYCAL<br />

ASBESTOS LITlGATION<br />

f T.A.S. Part 30<br />

-- i (Heitler, J.)<br />

0<br />

THIS DOCUMENT REFERS TO:<br />

1 IndexNo.: <strong>11</strong>9385 0,106463/01<br />

SALVATORE RANDAZZO AND RHODA<br />

RANIIAZZO,<br />

j NO OPPOSITION<br />

Plaintiffs, j SUMMARY JUDGMENT<br />

i MOTION AND ORDER<br />

-against-<br />

A. C. & S., INC., et ab,<br />

Defendants. !<br />

WHEREFORE, defendant, Treadwell Corporation, hereby requests summary Jdgment<br />

the above entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules 5 3212, dismissing plaintiffs'<br />

complaint against defendant, Treadwell Corporation, with prejudice in this action, and there<br />

being no opposition thereto,<br />

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against<br />

defendant, Treadwell Corporation, be and the sake are hereby dismissed with prejudice and<br />

without costs.<br />

Attorney for Defendant<br />

Treadwell Corporation<br />

Salvatore Randazzo and Rhoda Rand=>'<br />

MCGWEY & UUGER, P.C. WElTZ&LUXENBERG,P.C. w q f:;i>:<br />

80 Broad Street-Suite 2300 700 Broadway I; - $ . ,a i d "<br />

New York, New York 100<strong>04</strong><br />

(212) 509-3456<br />

SO ORDERED,<br />

New York, New York 10003<br />

/,pi< 2 6 20<strong>11</strong><br />

f 0 j, 'I'f-JRK<br />

123515342.<br />

cOUN~-~ C;~EBK:'SFF~CE~<br />

N0<strong>04</strong><strong>04</strong>78-1


I<br />

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK<br />

COUNTY OF NEW YORK<br />

IN RENEW YORK COUNTY i NYCAL<br />

ASBESTOS LITIGATION<br />

i I.A.S. Part 30<br />

A i (Heitlex, J.)<br />

THIS DOCUMENT REFERS TO:<br />

ANNE M. REILLER, INDIVIDUALLY AND AS<br />

EXECUTRIX FOR THE ESTATE OF<br />

ANTHONY JOHN REILLER,<br />

Plaintiffs,<br />

j Index No.: 106642/01<br />

NO OPPOSITION<br />

SUMMARY JUDGMENT<br />

MOTION AND 0RX)ER<br />

-against-<br />

A. C. & S., INC., etal.,<br />

Defendants.<br />

WHEREFORE, defendant, Treadwell Corporation, hereby requests summary judgment in<br />

the above entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules 5 3212, dismissing plaintiffs'<br />

complaint against defendant, Treadwell Corporation, with prejudice in this action, and there<br />

being no opposition thereto,<br />

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against<br />

defendant, Treadwell Corporation, be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and<br />

without costs.<br />

Treadwel I Corporation Estate of Anthony John Reille D<br />

MCF~VNEY & KLUGER, P.C.<br />

WEITZ & LUXENBERE, P.C.<br />

80 Broad Street-Suite 2300<br />

700 Broadway<br />

New York, New York 100<strong>04</strong><br />

York,NewYork 10003 APR 2 6 20<strong>11</strong><br />

(212) 509-3456<br />

F\'IFW VORK<br />

SO ORDERED,<br />

COUNN CLERK'S OFFICE<br />

1235-0923<br />

N0<strong>04</strong><strong>04</strong>78-1


SlJYKEME COURT OF THE STAI’E OF NEW YON<br />

COUNTY OF NEW YORK<br />

^-<br />

1N RE: NEW YORK C0IhJl.Y<br />

I NYCAI,<br />

ASBESTOS 1,ITIGATlON j X.A.S. Part 30<br />

: (Heitler, J.)<br />

THIS DOCUMENT REFERS TO:<br />

i Index No.: 1 O6642/01<br />

ANNE M. REILLER, INDIVIDUALLY AND AS i<br />

EXECUTRIX FOR ‘THE ESTATE OF<br />

ANTHONY JOHN REILLER, i NO OPPOSITION<br />

f SUMMARY JUDGMENT<br />

Plaintiffs, i MOTION AND ORDER<br />

-against-<br />

A. C. & S., INC., et nl.,<br />

Defendants. [<br />

WHEEFORE, defendant, Oakfabco, Inc., hereby requests summary judgment in the<br />

above entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules 8 3212, dismissing plaintiffs’<br />

complaint against defendant, Oakfabco, Inc., with prejudice in this action, and there being no<br />

opposition thereto,<br />

ORDERED, that upon notice to all eo-defendants, all claims and cross claims against<br />

defendant, Oakfabco, Inc., be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and without<br />

costs.<br />

Dated: New York, New York<br />

,201 1<br />

Robert Darish, Esq.<br />

Attorney for Defendant<br />

Oakfabco, Inc.<br />

MCGIVNEY & KLUGER, P.c.<br />

80 Broad Street-Suite 2300<br />

New York, New York I00<strong>04</strong><br />

(212) 509-3456<br />

SO ORDERED,<br />

Estate of Anthony John Rl<br />

WElTZ & LUXENE~ERG, P.C.<br />

700 Broadway<br />

New York, New York 10003 APR 2 6 20”<br />

(212) 558-5500<br />

NEW WRK<br />

cauNN CLERKS OFF“‘<br />

I<br />

257 J -0750<br />

N0<strong>04</strong><strong>04</strong>74-1 APK 15 20<strong>11</strong>


S1JYREiME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK<br />

- COIJN'I'Y OF NEW YORK<br />

1N RE: NEW YORK COUNTY<br />

ASBESTOS LITXGATlON<br />

THIS D O C U ~ FEFERS T<br />

TO:<br />

CAROL ANN KELLY AS EXECUTRIX FOR<br />

THE ESTATE OF LAWRENCE J. KELLY AND<br />

CAROL ANN KELLY, INDIVIDUALLY,<br />

-against-<br />

A. C. & S., INC., et al.,<br />

Plaintiffs,<br />

Defendants.<br />

NYCAL<br />

J.A.S. Part 30<br />

(Heitler, J.><br />

Index No.: 106643/01<br />

NO OPPOSITION<br />

SUMMARY JUDGMENT<br />

MOTION AND ORDER<br />

WHEREFORE, defendant, Tishman Liquidating Corp., hereby requests summary<br />

judgment in the above entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules 9 3212, dismissing<br />

plaintiffs' complaint against defendant, Tishman Liquidating C op, with prejudice in this action,<br />

and there being no opposition thereto,<br />

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against<br />

defendant, Tishman Liquidating Cop, be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and<br />

without costs.<br />

in & LUXENBERG, P.C.<br />

80 Broad Street-Suite 2300<br />

700 Broadway<br />

New Y ork, New York 1000 rk,NewYork 10003 APR 2 6 20<strong>11</strong><br />

(212) 509-3456<br />

NEW YORK<br />

SO ORDERED, COUl" CLERK'S OFFICE<br />

2383-22973<br />

N0<strong>04</strong><strong>04</strong>74-1 APR 15 20<strong>11</strong>


SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK<br />

COUNTY OF NEW YORK<br />

IN RE: NEW YORK COUNTY<br />

ASBESTOS LITIGATION<br />

~-<br />

THlS DOCUMENT REFERS TO:<br />

MAURl SAVOLAINEN AND SILJA<br />

S AVOLAINEN,<br />

-against-<br />

Plaintiffs,<br />

NYCAL<br />

I.A.S. Part 30<br />

(Heitler, 3.)<br />

Index No.: 106962/01<br />

NO OPPOSITION<br />

SUMMARY JUDGMENT<br />

MOTION AND ORDER<br />

A. C. & S., NC., el ol.,<br />

I<br />

Defendants.<br />

WHEREFORE, defendant, Treadwell Corporation, hereby requests summary judgment in<br />

the above entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules § 3212, dismissing plaintiffs'<br />

complaint against defendant, Treadwell Corporation, with prejudice in this action, and there<br />

being no opposition thereto,<br />

OKDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against<br />

defendant, Treadwell Corporatian, be and the Same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and<br />

without costs.<br />

Dated: New York, New York<br />

T'..<br />

Carol M. Tempesta, Esq?<br />

Attorney for Defendant<br />

Treadwell Corporation<br />

MCGIVNEY & UUGER, P.C.<br />

80 Broad Street-Suite 2300 700 Broadway<br />

New York, New York 100<strong>04</strong><br />

(212) 509-3456<br />

, New York 10003<br />

APR 2 6 20''<br />

SO ORDERED,<br />

Hon. Sherry Klein Heitler<br />

p\EW YORK<br />

4LERK~ OFFICE'<br />

NDO4<strong>04</strong>78-3


SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK<br />

COUNTY OF NEW YORK -<br />

IN RE: NEW YORK COUNTY<br />

j NYCAL<br />

ASBESTOS LlTJGATION<br />

i I.A.S. Part 30<br />

i (Heitler, J.)<br />

6<br />

THIS DOCUMENT REFERS TO:<br />

,<br />

i Index No.: 106962/01<br />

MAURI SAVOLAlNEN AND SILJA<br />

SAVOLAlNEN,<br />

NO OPPOSITION<br />

Plaintiffs,<br />

SUMMARY JUDGmNT<br />

i MOTION AND ORDER<br />

-against-<br />

A. C. & S., INC., et al.,<br />

Defendants.<br />

i<br />

WHEREFORE, defendant, Safeguard Industrial Equipment Co., hereby requests<br />

summary judgment in the above entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules 6 32 12,<br />

dismissing plaintiffs’ complaint against defendant, Safeguard Industrial Equipment Co., with<br />

prejudice in this action, and there being no opposition thereto,<br />

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against<br />

defendant, Safeguard Industrial Equipment Co., be and the same are hereby dismissed with<br />

prejudice and without costs.<br />

Dated: New Yor , New York<br />

dl ,20<strong>11</strong><br />

FILED<br />

Matth D. Sampar, Esq.<br />

Attorney. Defendant Attorney for Plaintiffs<br />

Safeguard Industrial Equipment Co.<br />

Mauri Savolainen and Silja Savolainen<br />

MCGIVNEY & KLUCER, P.C.<br />

WEITZ & LUXENBERG, P.C.<br />

80 Broad Street-Suite 2300<br />

700 Broadway<br />

New York, New York 100<strong>04</strong><br />

New York, New York 10003<br />

(212) 509-3456<br />

(212) --. 558-5500<br />

SO ORDERED,<br />

Hon. Sherry Klein Heitler<br />

324-579013<br />

N0<strong>04</strong><strong>04</strong>78- 1


SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK<br />

COUNTY OF NEW YORK<br />

IN KI3: NEW YORK COUNTY<br />

! NYCAL<br />

ASBESTOS LlTIGATION<br />

i I.A.S. Part 30<br />

! (Heitler, J.)<br />

1<br />

THIS DOCUMENT REFERS TO:<br />

i Index No.: 1 IW7!YOOfi&><br />

DONNA M. MEDER, PERSONAL 106797/06<br />

REPRESENTATIVE FOR THE ESTATE OF<br />

DONALD E. SIERING,<br />

i NO OPPOSITION<br />

Plaintiffs, j SUMMARY JUDGMENT<br />

i MOTION AND ORDER .<br />

-against-<br />

A. C. & S., XNC., et al.,<br />

Defendants. :<br />

WHEREFORE, defendant, Treadwell Corporation, hereby requests summary judgment in<br />

the above entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules 5 3212, dismissing plaintiffs'<br />

complaint against defendant, Treadwell Corporation, with prejudice in this action, and there<br />

being no opposition thereto,<br />

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against<br />

defendant, Treadwell Corporation, be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and<br />

without costs.<br />

Dated: New York, New York<br />

,Ti<br />

Michele J. Mittlehm, Esq.<br />

Attorney for Defendant<br />

Treadwell Corporation<br />

MCGIVNEY & KLLJFER, P.C.<br />

80 Broad Street-Suite 2300<br />

New York, New York 100<strong>04</strong><br />

(212) 509-3456<br />

SO ORDEmD,<br />

Estate of Donald E. Siering<br />

WElTZ & LUXENBERG, P.C.<br />

700 Broadway<br />

New York, New York 10003<br />

Fl<br />

123GQW<br />

APR 2 6 20<strong>11</strong><br />

NEW YORK<br />

1y CLERK'S oFFm<br />

N0<strong>04</strong><strong>04</strong>78-1


SUPRfZME COURT OF THE S7ATE OF NEW Y ORK<br />

COUNTY OF NEW YORK<br />

IN E: NkW YORK COUNTY<br />

ASBESTOS LTTIGATION<br />

THIS DOCUMENT REFERS To:<br />

EDWARD R. SKELLEY AND BARBARA J.<br />

SKELLEY,<br />

-against-<br />

A. C. & S., INC., et ai.,<br />

Plaintiffs,<br />

Defendants.<br />

NYCAL<br />

I.A.S. Part 30<br />

(Heitler, J.><br />

u<br />

Index No.: <strong>11</strong>9379/00, 107095/01<br />

NO OPPOSITION<br />

SUMMARY JUDGMENT<br />

MOTION AND ORDER<br />

WHEREFORE, defendant, Treadwell Corporation, hereby requests summary judgment in<br />

the above entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules fj 3212, dismissing plaintiffs’<br />

complaint against defendant, Treadwell Corporation, with prejudice in this action, and there<br />

being no opposition thereto,<br />

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against<br />

defendant, Treadwell Corporation, be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and<br />

without co’sts.<br />

Dated: New York. New York<br />

Treadwell Corporation<br />

MCGJVNEY & KLUGER, P.C.<br />

80 Broad Street-Suite 2300<br />

New York, New York 100<strong>04</strong><br />

(212) 509-3456<br />

SO ORDERED,<br />

EdwardR. Skelley and Barbara J.<br />

WEITZ & LUXENBERG, P.c.<br />

700 Broadway<br />

New York, New York 10003<br />

F<br />

APR 2 6 20’’<br />

p;Ey\ YOWL<br />

couN\ITy CLERK’S<br />

1235-2334


SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW Y OM<br />

COUNTY OF NEW YORK<br />

EDWARD R. SKELLEY and BARBARA J.<br />

SKELLEY,<br />

A.C. & S., INC., et al.,<br />

Plaintiff(s),<br />

-against-<br />

NYCAL<br />

I.A.S. Part 30<br />

: (Hon. Sheny Klein Heitler)<br />

: Index No(s).: 107095-01<br />

: NO-OPPOSITION SUMMARY<br />

: JUDGMENT MOTION AND<br />

ORDER<br />

I<br />

WHEREFORE, defendant CRANE CO. hereby requests summary judgment in the<br />

above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212, dismissing<br />

plaintiffs' complaint against defendant CRANE CO. with prejudice, and there being no<br />

opposition thereto,<br />

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against<br />

defendant CRANE CO. be, and the same are hereby, dismissed with prejudice and without costs.<br />

Dated: 3 \3 O\ (\<br />

Newxork, New Pork<br />

?<br />

i<br />

Frank Ortiz, Esq.<br />

WEITZ & LUXENBERG, P.C,<br />

Attorneys for Plaintiff(s)<br />

700 Broadway CRANE CO.<br />

New York, NY 10003<br />

599 Lexington Avenue<br />

(212) 558-5500<br />

New York, NY 10022<br />

(212) 536-3900<br />

NEW Y0R3'K<br />

SO ORDERED,<br />

Hon. Sherry Klein Heitler<br />

APR 1520<strong>11</strong>


SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YOKK<br />

comm OF NEW YO^<br />

I_---<br />

IN RE: NEW YORK COUNTY<br />

ASBESTOS LITIGATION<br />

/ NYCAL<br />

i I.A.S. Part 3,<br />

j (Heitler, J.)<br />

THIS DOCUMENT REFERS Fro:<br />

; Index No.: 1 1937610<br />

ELlZABETH WALTER, INDIVIDUALY AND<br />

AS EXEC. FOR THE ESTATE OF THEODORE i<br />

F. WALKER, \ NO OPPOSITION<br />

j SUMMARY JUDGMENT<br />

Plaintiffs, i MOTION AND ORDER<br />

-against-<br />

A. C. & S., rNC., et al.,<br />

Defendants.<br />

i<br />

WHEREFOE, defendant, Treadwell Corporation, hereby requests summary judgment in<br />

the above entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules 8 3212, dismissing plaintiffs'<br />

complaint against defendant, Treadwell Corporation, with prejudice in this action, and there<br />

being no opposition thereto,<br />

ORDERED, that upon notice to all.co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against<br />

defendant, Treadwell Corporation, be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and<br />

without costs.<br />

Attorney for Defendant<br />

Treadwell Corporation<br />

MCGIVNEY & KLWGER, P.C.<br />

80 Broad Street-Suite 2300<br />

New York, New York 100<strong>04</strong><br />

(212) 509-3456<br />

WEXTZ & LUXENBERG, P.C.<br />

SO ORDERED,<br />

N0<strong>04</strong><strong>04</strong>78-1


SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK<br />

COUN‘1’Y OF NEW YORK<br />

IN RE-NEW YOKK COUNTY<br />

i NYCAL<br />

ASBESTOS LITIGATION<br />

j T.A.S. Part 30<br />

i (Heitler, J.)<br />

THIS DOCUMENT REFERS TO:<br />

i Index No.: <strong>11</strong>9378/00,<br />

JOAN C. SPARLING, AS EXECUTRIX FOR<br />

THE ESTATE OF OSCAR H. SPARLING, AND j<br />

JOAN C. SPARLING, INDIVIDUALLY,<br />

A. C. & S., INC., etal.,<br />

Plaintiffs, i NO OPPOSITION<br />

i SUMMARY JUDGMENT<br />

-against- i MOTION AND ORDER<br />

-<br />

Defendants.<br />

i<br />

WHEREFORE, defendant, Oakfabco, Inc., hereby requests summary judgment in the<br />

above entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules 8 3212, dismissing plaintiffs’<br />

complaint against defendant, Oakfabco, Inc., with prejudice in this action, and there being no<br />

opposition thereto,<br />

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against<br />

defendant, Oakfabco, Inc., be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and without<br />

costs.<br />

Dated: New York. New York<br />

Attorney for Defendant<br />

Oakfabco, Inc.<br />

M c G ~ & Y KLUGER, P.C.<br />

80 Broad Street-Suite 2300<br />

New York, New York 100<strong>04</strong><br />

(212) 509-3456<br />

SO ORDERED,<br />

WEITZ & LUXENBERG, P.C.<br />

700 Broadway<br />

New York, New York 10003 APR 2 6 20<strong>11</strong><br />

NE’&/ YORK<br />

COUNTY CLERKS 8FFIGt<br />

2571-0756s


SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK<br />

COUNTY OF NEW YON<br />

IN RE: NEW YORK COUNTY<br />

! NYCAL<br />

ASBESTOS LITIGATION<br />

j I.A.S. Part 30<br />

j (Heitler, J.)<br />

THIS D~ECENT REFERS m:<br />

i Index No.: 107450/01<br />

KATHY METZGER, AS EXECUTRIX FOR THE i<br />

ESTATE OF DENNIS M. WHALEN,<br />

-against-<br />

A. C. & S., INC., et al.,<br />

i<br />

NO OPPOSITION<br />

Plaintiffs, j SUMMARY JUDGMENT<br />

j MOTION AND ORDER<br />

Defendants.<br />

j<br />

WHEREFORE, defendant, Treadwell Corporation, hereby requests summary judgment in<br />

the above entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules § 3212, dismissing plaintiffs'<br />

complaint against defendant, Treadwell Corporation, with prejudice in this action, and there<br />

being no opposition thereto,<br />

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against<br />

defendant, Treadwell Corporation, be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and<br />

without costs.<br />

Dated: New York, New York<br />

Treadwell corporation<br />

MCGIVNEY & KLUGER, P.C.<br />

80 Broad Street-Suite 2300<br />

New York, New York 100<strong>04</strong><br />

(212) 509-3456<br />

SO ORDERED,<br />

WEITZ & LUXENBERG, P.C.<br />

New 700 Broadway York, New York 10003 FILED<br />

APR 2 6 20<strong>11</strong><br />

1235-1937 NE\/\J YORK<br />

COUNTY CLERKS OFFICE<br />

N0<strong>04</strong><strong>04</strong>78-1


SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK<br />

COUNTY OF NEW YORK<br />

IN RE: NEW YOFX CITY ASBESTOS LITIGATION<br />

__________________________________l__ll_----------"--------------<br />

X<br />

This Document Relates To:<br />

: NYCAL<br />

EDWARD WYANT, SR. and NANCY WYANT, : 1,A.S. Part 30<br />

: (Hon. Sherry Klein Heitler)<br />

Plaintiff( s),<br />

: Index No(s).: 107774-01<br />

-against-<br />

: NO-OPPOSITION SUMMARY<br />

A.C. & S., INC., et al.,<br />

: JUDGMENT MOTION AND<br />

: ORDER<br />

Defendants.<br />

frr_rr_______________---------------------------------------------<br />

WHEREFORE, defendant CRANE CO. hereby requests summary judgment in the<br />

above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 32 12, dismissing<br />

plaintiffs' complaint against defendant CRANE CO. with prejudice, and there being no<br />

apposition thereto,<br />

ORLlERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against<br />

defendant CRANE CO. be, and the same are hereby, dismissed with prejudice and without costs.<br />

Dated: 3 \>u\ \\<br />

X<br />

Attorneys for Plaintiff(s)<br />

700 Broadway CRANECO. 1 E D '<br />

New York, NY 10003<br />

(212) 558-5500<br />

599 Lexington Avenue<br />

New York, NY 10022 APR 2 6 20<strong>11</strong><br />

SO ORDERED,<br />

pi!: I*+ VURK<br />

rnii~ if CLERK'S OFFICE<br />

15 20<strong>11</strong>


NYCAL<br />

I.A.S. Part 30<br />

Hon. Sherry Klein Heitler, JSC.<br />

DIANA A. JOHNSON, AS ADMINISTRATRIX FOR THE ESTATE<br />

OF SIMON 6. MANNING, AND DIANA A. JOHNSON,<br />

INDIVIDUALLY,<br />

Plaintiffs,<br />

Index No,: 108009-2001<br />

NO OPPOSITION SUMMARY JUDGMENT<br />

MOTION AND ORDER<br />

A.C. & S INC. et al. including,<br />

GENERAL ELECTRIC COMPANY,<br />

-against-<br />

Defendants.<br />

WHEREFORE, defendant GENERAL ELECTRIC COMPANY hereby request summary judgment in<br />

the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212, dismissing plaintiffs’<br />

complaint against defendant GENERAL ELECTRIC COMPANY with prejudice, and there being no<br />

opposition thereto,<br />

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against defendant<br />

GENERAL ELECTRIC COMPANY be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and without costs.<br />

D<br />

Attorney for Pluintvfs<br />

546 Fifth Avenue, qfh Floor<br />

New York, New York 1003<br />

m -<br />

*-<br />

1 .<br />

I en<br />

Stephen Novakidis, Esq.<br />

Sedgwick, Detert, Moran & ArF,!<br />

Attorneys for General Electric Company<br />

Three Gateway Center, 12th Floor<br />

Newark, NJ 07102<br />

ApR 2 6 20”<br />

SO ORDERED,<br />

APR 15 20<strong>11</strong><br />

NJl432746v 1


SUPREME COIJRT OF THE STATE OF NEW YOKK<br />

COUNTY OF NEW YORK<br />

IN RE: NEW YO& COUNTY i NYCAL<br />

ASBESTOS LITIGATION<br />

i 1A.S. Part 30<br />

II_ ! (Heitler, J.)<br />

THIS DOCUMENT REFERS TO:<br />

HARRY T. POWERS, INDIVIDUALLY AND<br />

PERSONAL REPRESENTATIVE FOR THE<br />

ESTATE OF GLENNA E. POWERS,<br />

-against-<br />

Plaintiffs,<br />

j Index No.: 109019/01<br />

!<br />

j NO OPPOSITION<br />

SUMMARY JUDGMENT<br />

! MOTION AND ORDER<br />

A. C. & S., INC., et al.,<br />

Defendants.<br />

i<br />

WHEFEFORE, defendant, Treadwell Corporation, hereby requests summary judgment in<br />

the above entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules $ 3212, dismissing plaintiffs’<br />

complaint against defendant, Treadwell Corporation, with prejudice in this action, and there<br />

being no opposition thereto,<br />

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against<br />

defendant, Treadwell Corporation, be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and<br />

without costs.<br />

Carol M. Tempesta, Esq.<br />

Attorney for Defendant<br />

Treadwell Corporation<br />

MCGIVNEY & UUGER, P.C.<br />

80 Broad Street-Suite 2300<br />

New York, New York 100<strong>04</strong><br />

(212) 509-3456<br />

Estate of Glenna E. Powers<br />

WEIT2 & LUXENBERG, P,<br />

SO ORDERED,<br />

N0<strong>04</strong><strong>04</strong>78- I


SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK<br />

COUNTY OF NEW YORK<br />

IN RE NEW YORK CITY ASBESTOS LITIGATION NYCAL<br />

Hon. Sherry Klein Heitler<br />

X<br />

GERALDINE 1. REY, as Administratrix for the Estate of JOHN<br />

REY, and GERALDINE 1. REY, Individually,<br />

-against-<br />

Plaintiff(s),<br />

Index No. 109<strong>11</strong>5-2001<br />

NO OPPOSITION<br />

SUMMARY JUDGMENT MOTION AND<br />

ORDER<br />

A. C. 81 S. INC., et al., including<br />

FOSTER WHEELER CORPORATION,<br />

Defendants.<br />

X<br />

WHEREFORE, defendant FOSTER WHEELER, L.L.C. (sued herein as “FOSTER WHEELER<br />

CORPORATION”) hereby requests summary judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil<br />

Practice Law and Rules Section 3212, dismissing plaintiffs’ complaint against defendant FOSTER<br />

WHEELER, L.L.C. with prejudice, and there being no opposition thereto,<br />

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against defendant<br />

FOSTER WHEELER, L,L,C. be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and without costs.<br />

Dated:<br />

New York New York<br />

3/\4 I<br />

Frank Ortiz, Esq.<br />

Weitz & Luxenberg, P.C.<br />

Attorneys for Plaintvfs<br />

700 Broadway<br />

New York, NY 10003<br />

Dennis E. Vega, Esq.<br />

Sedgwick, Deter?, Moran & Arnold, LLP<br />

Attorneys for Foster Wheeler, L. L.C.<br />

Three Gateway Center, 12‘h Flo<br />

Newark, NJ 07102


SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK<br />

cowry OF m w YORK<br />

I_<br />

IN RE: NEW YORK COUNTY<br />

AS BE SI-0 S LI TI GAT1 ON<br />

THIS DOCUMENT REFERS m:<br />

KATHERINE ROMANO, EXECUTRIX FOR<br />

THE ESTATE OF ANTHONY J. ROMANO,<br />

-against-<br />

A. C. & S., INC., et al.,<br />

! NYCAL<br />

i l.A.S. Part 30<br />

i (Heitler, J.)<br />

j<br />

Index No.: <strong>11</strong>0165/Ol<br />

: NO OPPOSITION<br />

Plaintiffs, j SUMMARY JUDGMENT<br />

: MOTION AND ORDER<br />

-<br />

Defendants. !<br />

WHEREFORX, defendant, Treadwell Corporation, hereby requests summary judgment in<br />

the above entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules 8 3212, dismissing plaintiffs’<br />

complaint against defendant, Treadwell Corporation, with prejudice in this action, and there<br />

being no opposition thereto,<br />

ORDEWD, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against<br />

defendant, Treadwell Corporation, be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and<br />

without costs.<br />

Dated: New York, New York<br />

“/[ ,20<strong>11</strong><br />

Carol M. Tempesta, Esq. ‘<br />

Attorney for Defendant<br />

Treadwell Corporation<br />

MCGIVNEY & KLUGER, P.C.<br />

SO Broad Street-Suite 2300<br />

New York, New York 100<strong>04</strong><br />

(2 12) 509-3456<br />

SO ORDERED,<br />

WHTZ & LUXENBERG, P.C.<br />

700 Broadway<br />

New York, New York 100 SILED<br />

APR 2 6 20’’<br />

N0<strong>04</strong>O474- I


SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK<br />

COUNTY OF NEW YORK<br />

IN RE: NEW YORK COUNTY<br />

NYCAL<br />

ASBESTOS LITIGATION<br />

I.A.S. Part 30<br />

(Heitler, J.)<br />

THIS DOCUMENT REFERS TO:<br />

MADELINE MCGINN, INDIVIDUALLY AND<br />

RICHARD JOHN MAYERICK AND RICHARD<br />

JOHN MAYERICK AS PERSONAL<br />

REPRESENTATIVES FOR THE ESTATE OF<br />

HAROLD MCGINN,<br />

Plain tiffs ,<br />

-against-<br />

A. C. & S., INC., et al.,<br />

Defendants.<br />

Index No.: <strong>11</strong><strong>04</strong>38/01<br />

NO OPPOSITION<br />

SUMMARY JUDGMENT<br />

MOTION AND ORDER<br />

WHEREFORE, defendant, Treadwell Corporation, hereby requests summary judgment in<br />

the above entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules 0 3212, dismissing plaintiffs’<br />

complaint against defendant, Treadwell Corporation, with prejudice in this action, and there<br />

being no opposition thereto,<br />

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against<br />

defendant, Treadwell Corporation, be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and<br />

without costs.<br />

Dated: New York, New York<br />

4 / ! ,20<strong>11</strong><br />

~<br />

Carol M. Tempesta, Esq.<br />

Attorney for Defendant<br />

Treadwell Corporation<br />

MCGIVNEY & KLUGE& P.C.<br />

80 Broad Street-Suite 2300<br />

New York. New York 100<strong>04</strong><br />

(212) 509-3456<br />

SO ORDERED,<br />

-<br />

Wm-OMZ-<br />

Attorney far Plaintiffs<br />

EstateofHaroldMcGinn F I L<br />

WElTZ & LUXENBERG, P.C.<br />

700 Broadway<br />

”’<br />

New York, New York 10003 AP<br />

fJ E‘$/ YO n K<br />

COUNTY CLERK‘S OFFICE<br />

1235-19343<br />

N0<strong>04</strong><strong>04</strong>78-1<br />

APR 15 20<strong>11</strong>


' NYCAL<br />

BRYAN M. PRICE and LINDA GERACI PRICE, :<br />

Part 30<br />

(Hon. Sherry Klein Heitler)<br />

Plaintiff( s),<br />

-against-<br />

:<br />

Index No. 1 1 1220-0 1<br />

A.C. & S., INC., et al.,<br />

NO-OPPOSTTTON SUMMARY<br />

: JUDGMENT MOTION AND ORDER<br />

Defendants. !<br />

WHEREFORE, defendant CRANE CO. hereby requests suinniary judgment in the<br />

above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212, dismissing<br />

plaintiffs' complaint against defendant CRANE CO. with prejudice, and there being no<br />

opposition thereto,<br />

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against<br />

defendant CRANE CO. be, and the same are hereby, dismissed with prejudice and WithoLit costs<br />

Datcd: 3 \3 L\ I\<br />

Kirste Alford Kneis, Esq.<br />

K&I, ATESLLP<br />

Attorneys for Plaintiff(s)<br />

700 Broadway CRANE CO.<br />

New York, NY 10003 599 Lexington Avenue hpR<br />

(212) 558-5500 New York, NY 10022-6030<br />

4 2 -1-2) 536- 3900<br />

SO ORDERED,


I<br />

536.07695/AJM<br />

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK<br />

COUNTY OF NEW YORK<br />

IN RE: NEW YORK CITY<br />

ASBESTOS LITIGATION :<br />

This document relates to:<br />

NATALE V. GRILLO,<br />

NYCAL<br />

IAS PART 30<br />

(Honorab e Sherry K-oin Heitler<br />

Index No. :<br />

12<strong>11</strong>18/01<br />

(January 20<strong>11</strong> Monthly FIFO Trial<br />

Group)<br />

1<br />

Defendants.<br />

NO OPPOSITION<br />

SUMMARY JUDGMENT MOTION<br />

AND ORDER<br />

I<br />

WHEREFORE,<br />

defendant, Unit<br />

d Conveyor Corporation, hereby<br />

requests summary judgment in the<br />

above-entitled case, pursuant to<br />

Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212, dismissing plaintiff's<br />

Complaint against defendant, United Conveyor Corporation, with<br />

prejudice, and there being no opposition thereto.<br />

ORDERED,<br />

that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and<br />

crossclaims against defendant, United Conveyor Corporation, be and the<br />

same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and without<br />

D<br />

I .<br />

\<br />

I<br />

!<br />

DATED :<br />

East Hanover New Jersey<br />

APT? 2 6 20<strong>11</strong><br />

:'<br />

WEITZ & LUXENBERG<br />

Attorneys for Plaintiff<br />

& FLINN<br />

700 Broadway Attorneys for Defendant,<br />

New York, New York 10003<br />

United Conveyor Corporation<br />

72 Eagle Rock Avenue, Suite 350<br />

P.O. Box 438<br />

East Hanover, New Jersey 07936<br />

SO ORDERED,


536.07703/AJM<br />

;UPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK<br />

ZOUNTY OF NEW YORK<br />

CN RE: NEW YORK CITY<br />

NYCAL<br />

ASBESTOS LITIGATION : IAS PART 30<br />

rhis document relates to:<br />

(Honorable Sherry K1 in H it1<br />

3ERTWD E. LINDSEY,<br />

: Index No.: *fi-><br />

120575/01<br />

Plaintiff,<br />

: (January 20<strong>11</strong> Monthly FIFO Trial<br />

vs . : Group)<br />

JNITED CONVEYOR CORPORATION,<br />

2t al., : NO OPPOSITION<br />

Defendants.<br />

:<br />

:<br />

SUMMARY JUDGMENT MOTION<br />

AND ORDER<br />

WHEREFORE, defendant, United Conveyor Corporation, hereby<br />

requests summary judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to<br />

Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212, dismissing plaintiff's<br />

Complaint against defendant, United Conveyor Corporation, with<br />

prejudice, and there being no opposition thereto.<br />

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and<br />

crossclaims against defendant, United Conveyor Corporation, e and the<br />

d .', ?- p e,<br />

same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and wiLhout ed'as.<br />

I , ><br />

I ) Ij 20<strong>11</strong><br />

700 Broadway Attorneys for Defendant,<br />

New York, New York 10003<br />

United Conveyor Corporation<br />

72 Eagle Rock Avenue, Suite 350<br />

P.O. Box 438<br />

East Hanover, New Jersey 07936<br />

SO ORDERED,<br />

"-- "<br />

Honorable Shevy Klein Heitler


536.07703/AJM<br />

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK<br />

COUNTY OF NEW YORK<br />

IN RE: NEW YORK CITY<br />

NYCAL<br />

ASBESTOS LITIGATION : IAS PART 30<br />

(Honorable ,,,erry Klein Heitler)<br />

This document relates to:<br />

RUDOLPH BIBOW,<br />

Index No. :<br />

VS .<br />

Plaintiff,<br />

(January 20<strong>11</strong> Monthly FIFO Trial<br />

Group)<br />

UNITED CONVEYOR CORPORATION,<br />

et al.,<br />

Defendants.<br />

NO OPPOSITION<br />

SUMMARY JUDGMENT MOTION<br />

AND ORDER<br />

WHEREFORE,<br />

defendant, United Conveyor Corporation, hereby<br />

requests summary judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to<br />

Civil. Practice Law and Rules Section 3212,<br />

dismissing plaintiff's<br />

Complaint against defendant, United Conveyor Corporation, with<br />

prejudice, and there being no opposition thereto.<br />

ORDERED,<br />

that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and<br />

crossclaims aqainst defendant, United Conveyor Corporation, be and the<br />

-..<br />

same are hereby dismissed w itEAj<br />

Bzld without costs.<br />

APR 2 6 20<strong>11</strong><br />

& FLINN<br />

700 Broadway Attorneys for Defendant,<br />

New York, New York 10003<br />

United Conveyor Corporation<br />

72 Eagle Rock Avenue, Suite 350<br />

, Box 438<br />

t Hanover, New Jersey 07936<br />

SO ORDERED,


536.07706/AJM<br />

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW -*,-.---<br />

COUNTY OF NEW YORK<br />

YUKK<br />

IN RE: NEW YORK CITY<br />

ASBESTOS LITIGATION :<br />

This document relates to:<br />

PETER CONNOLLY,<br />

NYCAL<br />

IAS PART 30<br />

(Honorab e Sherry Klein Heitler)<br />

Index No. : <strong>11</strong>233/01<br />

vs .<br />

Plaintiff,<br />

(January 20<strong>11</strong> Monthly FIFO T rial<br />

Group)<br />

LIZTEC CONVEYOR COKPORPITION,<br />

et al.,<br />

Defendants.<br />

NO BPPOSITLON<br />

SUMMARY JUDGMENT MOTION<br />

AND ORDER<br />

WHEREFORE, defendant, United Conveyor Corporation, hereby<br />

requests summary judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to<br />

Complaint against defendant, United Conveyor Corporation, with<br />

prejudice, and there being no opposition thereto.<br />

ORDERED, that upon notice to a<strong>11</strong> co-defendants, a<strong>11</strong> claims and<br />

crossclaims against defendant, United Conveyor Corporation, be and<br />

same are hereby dismi.;sed with prejudice and without<br />

DATED: ‘f./&/,<br />

East Hanover, New Jersey<br />

Attorneys for<br />

700 Broadway<br />

New York, New<br />

SO ORDERED,<br />

Plaintiff<br />

York 10003<br />

@y<br />

& FLINN<br />

Attorneys for Defendant,<br />

United Conveyor Corporat ion<br />

72 Eagle Rock<br />

Avenue, Su .ite 350<br />

P.O. Box 438<br />

East Hanover, New Jersey - 07936<br />

-.1.* -~~~<br />

Honorabl Sh ry Klein Heitler


WHEREFORE, defendant Goulds Pumps Inc. hereby requests summary judgment in the aboveentitled<br />

case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212, dismissing plaintiff's complaint<br />

against defendant Goulds Pumps Inc.. with prejudice, and there being no opposition thereto,<br />

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against defendant<br />

Goulds Pumps Inc., be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and without costs.<br />

Dated: New York, New York<br />

JI h ,20<strong>11</strong><br />

e-<br />

Attorney for Plaintiff<br />

LEVY, PHILLIPS & KQNIGSBERG, LLP<br />

800 Third Avenue, 1 1 th Floor<br />

New York, New York 10022<br />

CULLEN & DYKMAN LLP<br />

177 Montague Street<br />

SO ORDERED,<br />

Hon. Sherry K. Heitler<br />

APR 2 6 20''<br />

NEV.l '(ORK<br />

c.,u~Ty GLknK'S OFFICE'<br />

00224274.WPD


536.08<strong>11</strong>9/AJM<br />

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK<br />

COUNTY OF NEW YORK<br />

IN RE: NEW YORK CITY<br />

NYCAL<br />

ASBESTOS LITIGATION : IAS PART 30<br />

(Honorable ,,,erry Klein Heitler)<br />

This document relates to:<br />

: Index No.: <strong>11</strong>3<strong>26</strong>0/01<br />

JOSEPH McCARTHY, Deceased,<br />

Plaintiff,<br />

:<br />

:<br />

(January 20<strong>11</strong> Monthly FIFO Trial<br />

Group)<br />

vs *<br />

: NO OPPOSITION<br />

UNITED CONVEYOR CORPORATION, : SUMMARY JUDGMENT MOTION<br />

et al. , : AND ORDER<br />

Defendants.<br />

WHEREFORE,<br />

defendant, United Conveyor Corporation, hereby<br />

requests summary judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to<br />

Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212, dismissing plaintiff's<br />

Complaint against defendant, United Conveyor Corporation, with<br />

prejudice, and there being no opposition thereto.<br />

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and<br />

crossclaims against defendant, United Conveyor Coyporation, be and the<br />

same are hereby dismissed with FeiuLcEaQwithout costs.<br />

DATED: 3'&//<br />

ARRITY, GF!AHAM, MURPHY, GAROFALO<br />

Attorneys for Plaintiff<br />

& FLINN<br />

700 Broadway Attorneys for Defendant,<br />

New York, New York 10003<br />

United Conveyor Corporation<br />

72 Eagle Rock Avenue, Suite 350<br />

so ORDERED ,<br />

New Jer 'sey 07936


SUPREME COURT QF THE STATE OF NEW YORK<br />

COUNTY OF NEW YORK<br />

Robert D, Hart<br />

NO OPPOSITION SUMMARY<br />

JUDGMENT MOTION<br />

AND ORDER<br />

WHEREFORE, defendant Goulds Pumps Inc. hereby requests summary judgment in the above-<br />

entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212, dismissing plaintiffs complaint<br />

against defendant Goulds Pumps Inc.. with prejudice, and there being no opposition thereto,<br />

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against defendant<br />

Gaulds Pumps Inc., be and the sme are hereby dismissed with prejudice and without costs.<br />

~~<br />

D ~ - :;kl d ~<br />

Erica V. Cesaro, Esq. Justin Tafe, sq.<br />

I<br />

Attorney far Plaintiff Att ey for Defendant<br />

LEVY, PHILLIPS & KONIGSBERG, LLP CULLEN & DYKMAN LL<br />

800 Third Avenue, <strong>11</strong> "' Floor<br />

177 Montague Street<br />

New York, New York 10022<br />

Arooklyn, New Yark <strong>11</strong>201<br />

I k, E D<br />

itler<br />

COUNTY CLERK'S .. - OFFIC@<br />

00224273. WPD


WHEREFORE, defendant Goulds Pumps Inc. hereby requests summary judgment in the aboveentitled<br />

case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212, dismissing plaintiffs complaint<br />

against defendant Goulds Pumps Inc.. with prejudice, and there being no opposition thereto,<br />

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against defendant<br />

Goulds Pumps Inc., be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and without costs.<br />

Dated: New York, New York<br />

$I,! ,20<strong>11</strong><br />

Attorney for Plaintiff<br />

LEVY, PHILLIPS & KONIGSBERG, LLP<br />

800 Third Avenue, 1 lth Floor<br />

New York, New York 10022<br />

177 Montague Street<br />

SO ORDERED,<br />

00224273.WPD


*<br />

.L<br />

TMc:CC(jpk)<br />

3 0/15/09<br />

THIS DOCUMENT RELATES TO:<br />

EDWAR.D MARTINI<br />

NO OPPOSITION SUMMARY<br />

JUDGMENT MOTION AND<br />

ORDER<br />

WHEREFORE, defendant Consolidated Edison Company of New York, hc.<br />

hereby requests summary judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law<br />

and Rules Section 3212, dismissing plaintiffs complaint against defendant Consolidated Edison<br />

Company of New York, Inc. with prejudice, and there being no opposition thereto,<br />

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross-claims<br />

,<br />

against defendant Consolidated Edison Company of New York, Inc., be and the same are hereby<br />

dismissed with prejudice and without costs.<br />

Dated: New,Ywk, New York<br />

_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ - _ _ ~ _ _ I I _ _ . _<br />

Benjhn Darche, Esq.<br />

WEITZ & LUXENBERG, P.C.<br />

Attorneys for Plaintiff<br />

700 Broadway<br />

New York, NY 100035<br />

Consolidated Edison Company of New<br />

York, Inc.<br />

4 Irving Place<br />

New York, NY<br />

Our File No<br />

S-6783-01<br />

SO ORDERED:<br />

Hon. Sherry Klein Heitler<br />

APR 2 6 20<strong>11</strong>


WHEREFORE, defendant Gaulds Pumps Inc. hereby requests summary judgment in the abaveentitled<br />

case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212, dismissing plaintiffs complaint<br />

against defendant Goulds Pumps Inc.. with prejudice, and there being no opposition thereto,<br />

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against defendant<br />

Goulds Pumps Inc,, be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice: and without costs.<br />

Ericav. Cesaro, Esq.<br />

Attorney for Plaintiff<br />

LEVY, PHILLIPS & KONIGSBERC, LLP CULLEN & DYKMAN LLP<br />

800 Third Avenue, 1 lth Floor<br />

177 Montague Street<br />

New York, New York 10022 n, New York <strong>11</strong>201<br />

SO ORDERED,<br />

FILED<br />

APR 2 6 20<strong>11</strong><br />

I<br />

00224271 ,WPU


Carl Inzanti<br />

NO OPPOSITION SUMMARY<br />

JUDGMENT MOTION<br />

AND ORDER<br />

WHEREFORE, defendant Goulds Pumps Inc. hereby requests summary judgment in the aboveentitled<br />

case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212, dismissing plaintiffs complaint<br />

against defendant Goulds Pumps Inc.. with prejudice, and there being no opposition thereto,<br />

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against defendant<br />

Goulds Pumps Inc., be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and without costs.<br />

Dated: New York, New York<br />

LEVY, PHILLIPS & KQNIGSBERG, LLP<br />

800 Third Avenue, 1 lth Floor<br />

New York, New York 10022<br />

CULLEN & DYKMAN LLP<br />

177 Montague Street<br />

Brooklyn, New York<br />

?Y 8)<br />

SO ORDERED, APR 2 6 20<strong>11</strong><br />

NEW YORK<br />

COUNTY CLERK'S OFF/%<br />

0022427 1 .WPD<br />

APR 13 20<strong>11</strong>


536.07706/AJM<br />

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW<br />

COUNTY OF NEW YORK<br />

IN RE: NEW YORK CITY<br />

ASBESTOS LITIGATION :<br />

This document relates to:<br />

PETER CONNOLLY,<br />

YORK<br />

NYCAL<br />

IAS PART 30<br />

(Honorable ,,,erry Klein Heitler)<br />

Index No. :<br />

(January 20<strong>11</strong> Monthly FIFO Trial<br />

Group)<br />

Defendants.<br />

NO OPPOYITION<br />

SUMMARY JUDGMENT MOTION<br />

AND ORDER<br />

WHEREFORE, defendant, United Conveyor Corporation, hereby<br />

'equests summary judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to<br />

'ivil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212, dismissing plaintiff's<br />

omplaint against defendant, United Conveyor<br />

Corporation, with<br />

rejudice, and there being no opposition thereto.<br />

ORDEFtED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and<br />

rossclaims against defendant, United Conveyor Corporation, be and<br />

am are hereby dismissed with prejudice and without<br />

4TED: +)i',/I,<br />

East Hanover, New Jersey<br />

Wtorneys for Plaintiff<br />

& FLINN<br />

700 Broadway Attorneys for Defendant,<br />

ilew York, New York 10003<br />

United Conveyor Corporation<br />

72 Eagle Rock Avenue, Suite 350<br />

P.O. Box 438<br />

East Hanover, New Jersey 07936<br />

;O ORDEMD,


536.07706/AJM<br />

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK<br />

COUNTY OF NEW YORK<br />

IN RE: NEW YORK CITY<br />

ASBESTOS LITIGATION :<br />

This document relates to:<br />

JOSEPH W. SHRECK,<br />

VS.<br />

Plaintiff,<br />

UNITED CONVEYOR CORPORATION,<br />

et al. ,<br />

Defendants.<br />

NYCAL<br />

IAS PART 30<br />

(Honorable Sherry K lein Heitler)<br />

Index No. : <strong>11</strong>8721/01<br />

(January 20<strong>11</strong> Monthly FIFO Trial<br />

Group)<br />

NO OPPOSITION<br />

SUMMARY J UDWNT MOTION<br />

AND ORDER<br />

WHEmFORE,<br />

defendant, United Conveyor Corporation, hereby<br />

requests summary judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to<br />

21vil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212, dismissing plaintiff's<br />

Zomplaint against defendant, United Conveyor Corporation, with<br />

prejudice, and there being no opposition thereto.<br />

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, a<strong>11</strong> claims and<br />

zrossclaims against defendant, United Conveyor Corpor<br />

same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and without<br />

, GAROFALO<br />

4ttorneys for Plaintiff<br />

700 Broadway Attorneys for Defendant,<br />

Jew York, New York 10003<br />

United Conveyor Corporation<br />

72 Eagle Rock Avenue, Suite 350<br />

30 ORDERED,<br />

07936


SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK<br />

COUNTY OF NEW YORK<br />

BRYAN M. PRICE and LINDA CTERACI PRICE,<br />

-against-<br />

Plain tiff( s),<br />

' NYCAL<br />

I.A.S. Part 3o<br />

: (Hon. Sherry Klein Heitler)<br />

: Index No. <strong>11</strong>9477-01<br />

AC. & S., INC., et al.,<br />

Defendants.<br />

: NO-OPPOSITION SUMMARY<br />

JUDGMENT MOTION AND ORDER<br />

WHEREFORE, defendant CRANE CO. hereby requests summary judgment in the<br />

above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 32 12, dismissing<br />

plaintiffs' complaint against defendant CRANE CO. with prejudice, and there being no<br />

opposition thereto,<br />

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against<br />

defendant CRANE CO. be, and the same are hereby, dismissed with prejudice<br />

Dated: 3 \3 \\ \\<br />

New York, New York<br />

Attorneys lor Plaintiff(s)<br />

Attorneys for Defendant<br />

700 Broadway CRANE CO.<br />

New York, NY 10003<br />

599 Lexington Avenue<br />

(212) 558-5500<br />

New York, NY 10022-6030<br />

,_.._.(212) 536-3900<br />

SO ORDERED,


536.10562/AJM<br />

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF<br />

COUNTY OF NEW YORK<br />

[E W 3RK<br />

IN RE: NEW YORK CITY<br />

ASBESTOS LITIGATION :<br />

This document relates to:<br />

CARMELO A. FICALOR?l,<br />

NY CAL<br />

IAS PART 30<br />

(Honorable Sherry Klein Heitler)<br />

Index No. :<br />

vs *<br />

Plaintiff,<br />

(January 20<strong>11</strong> Monthly FIFO Trial<br />

Group)<br />

UNITED CONVEYOR CORPORATION,<br />

et al. ,<br />

Defendants.<br />

NO OPPOSITION<br />

SUMMARY JUDGMENT MOTION<br />

AND ORDER<br />

WHEFtEFORE,<br />

defendant, United Conveyor Corporation, hereby<br />

requests summary judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to<br />

Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212, dismissing plaintiff's<br />

Complaint against defendant, United Conveyor Corporation, with<br />

prejudice, and there being no opposition thereto.<br />

ORDERED,<br />

that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and<br />

crossclaims against defendant, United Conveyor Corporation, be and the<br />

same are hereby dismissed with pr<br />

Bhout costs.<br />

DATED : m&-,,a( 7fI 70 I /<br />

Attorneys for Plaintiff<br />

700 Broadway Attorneys for Defendant,<br />

New York, New York 10003<br />

United Conveyor Corporation<br />

72 Eagle Rock Avenue, Suite 350<br />

P.O. Box 438<br />

East Hanover, New Jersey 07936<br />

SO ORDERED,<br />

0<strong>11</strong>


536.10562/AJM<br />

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK<br />

COUNTY OF NEW YORK<br />

IN RE: NEW YORK CITY<br />

NYCAL<br />

ASBESTOS LITIGATION : IAS PART 30<br />

(Honorable Sherry Klein Heitler)<br />

This document relates to:<br />

: Index NO.:<br />

ANGEL0 T. D'AGOSTINO,<br />

VS .<br />

Plaintiff, : (January 20<strong>11</strong> Monthly FIFO Trial<br />

: Group)<br />

UNITED CON'JEVCIR ZCREOP?TIO?T, : NO C3PPCBITICN<br />

et al. , : SUMMARY JUDGMENT MOTION<br />

: AND ORDER<br />

Defendants.<br />

WHEREFORE,<br />

defendant, United Conveyor Corporation, hereby<br />

requests summary judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to<br />

Jivil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212, dismissing plaintiff's<br />

:omplaint against defendant, United Conveyor Corporation, with<br />

irejudice, and there being no opposition thereto.<br />

ORDEWD, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and<br />

:rossclaims against defendant, United Conveyor Corporation, be<br />

jame are hereby dismissed with prejudice and withoutbo<br />

bpi: 2 6 20''<br />

-- %Q#l //dm<br />

JEITZ & LUXENBERG<br />

lttorneys for Plaintiff<br />

'00 Broadway<br />

lew York, New York 10003<br />

GARRITY, GRAHAM, MURPHY, GAROFALO<br />

& FLINN<br />

Attorneys for Defendant,<br />

United Conveyor Corporation<br />

72 Eagle Rock Avenue, Suite 350<br />

+-PR~Q. Box 438<br />

East Hanover, New Jersey 07936<br />

0 ORDERED,<br />

Honorable Sherry Klein Heitler


!<br />

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK<br />

COUNTY OF NEW YORK<br />

IN RE:<br />

NEW YORK CITY<br />

ASBESTOS LITIGATION<br />

I.A.S. Part 30<br />

(Heitler, J.)<br />

This Document Relates to:<br />

VlTO CANNIZZARO, AS ADMINISTRATOR FOR<br />

THE ESTATE OF VINCENT CANNIZZARO<br />

INDEX NO.: 01-120390<br />

NO OPPOSITION<br />

SUMMARY JUDGMENT<br />

MOTION AND ORDER<br />

against<br />

A.C. & S., INC., ET AL<br />

I<br />

WHEREFORE, defendant, KOHLER CO., hereby requests summary judgment in the<br />

3bove-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212, dismissing plaintiffs'<br />

:omplaint against defendant, KOHLER CO., with prejudice, and there being no opposition thereto,<br />

ORDERED, that upon notice to all codefendants, all claims and cross claims against<br />

jefendant, KOHLER CO,, be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and without costs.<br />

DATED:<br />

NEW YORK, New York<br />

iOAGLAND, LONGO, MORAN<br />

IUNST & DOUKAS, LLP<br />

ittorneys for Defendant,<br />

(OHLER CO.<br />

LO Paterson Street - PO Box 480<br />

Jew Brunswick, New Jersey 08903<br />

- -,<br />

.* Mviu<br />

EEE?J&N;r<br />

Attorneys for Plaintiff (s),<br />

VlTO CANNIZZARO, as Administrator for the<br />

Estate of VINCENT CANNIZZARO<br />

700 Broadway New York, New York 10003<br />

l<br />

HOAQLAND, LONGO<br />

MORAN, DUNST 8<br />

DOUKAS, U P<br />

AUORNEYS AT LAW<br />

NORTH JERSEY<br />

40 PAfERSON ST<br />

PO BOX 480<br />

NEWMUWICK, NJ<br />

SOUTH JERSEY<br />

701 WTSEY'S MILL RD<br />

SmE 202<br />

HRMMONTON. NJ<br />

io ORDERED:<br />

i


536.10564/AJM<br />

SUPREME COURT OF TI E STATE OF TEW<br />

COUNTY OF NEW YORK<br />

IN RE: NEW YORK CITY<br />

ASBESTOS LITIGATION :<br />

This document relates to:<br />

RAYMOND J. HICKEY,<br />

3RK<br />

NYCAL<br />

IAS PART 30<br />

(Honorable Sherry Klein Heitler)<br />

Index No. :<br />

vs .<br />

Plaintiff,<br />

(January 20<strong>11</strong> Monthly FIFO Trial<br />

Group)<br />

UNITED CONVEYOR CORPORATION,<br />

et al. ,<br />

Defendants.<br />

NO OPPOSITION<br />

SUMMARY JUDCMENT MOTION<br />

AND ORDER<br />

WHEREFORE,<br />

defendant, United Conveyor Corporation, hereby<br />

requests summary judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to<br />

Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212, dismissing plaintiff's<br />

Complaint against defendant, United Conveyor Corporation, with<br />

prejudice, and there being no opposition thereto.<br />

ORDERED, that upon notice to a<strong>11</strong> co-defendants, all claims and<br />

crossclaims against defendant, United Conveyor Corporation, be and the<br />

same are hereby dismissed with e&&&i&ithout<br />

DATED : fl&d w - 4 'z o//<br />

costs.<br />

, GAROFALO<br />

700 Broadway Attorneys for Defendant,<br />

New York, New York 10003<br />

United Conveyor Corporation<br />

72 Eagle Rock Avenue, Suite 350<br />

SO ORDERED,<br />

A<br />

P.O. Box 438<br />

st Hanover, New Jersey 07936


536.09778/AJM<br />

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK<br />

COUNTY OF NEW YORK<br />

IN RE: NEW YORK CITY<br />

ASBESTOS LITIGATION :<br />

This document relates to:<br />

JAMES R. FLEMING, Deceased,<br />

NYCAL<br />

IAS PART 30<br />

(Honorable Sherry Klein Heitler)<br />

Index No. :<br />

vs .<br />

Plaintiff,<br />

(January 20<strong>11</strong> Monthly FIFO Trial<br />

Group)<br />

UNITED CONVEYOR CORPORATION, : NO OPPOSITION<br />

et al., : SUMMARY JUDGMENT MOTION<br />

: AND ORDER<br />

Defendants.<br />

WHEREFORE,<br />

defendant, United Conveyor Corporation, hereby<br />

requests summary judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to<br />

Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212,<br />

dismissing plaintiff's<br />

Complaint against defendant, United Conveyor Corporation, with<br />

prejudice, and there being no opposition thereto.<br />

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and<br />

crossclaims against defendant, United Conveyor Corporation, be and the<br />

same are hereby dismissed with pre<br />

Dhout costs.<br />

, GAROFALO<br />

Attorneys for Plaintiff<br />

& FLINN<br />

700 Broadway Attorneys for Defendant,<br />

New York, New York 10003<br />

United Conveyor Corporation<br />

72 Eagle Rock Avenue, Suite 350<br />

P.O. Box 438<br />

East Hanover, New Jersey 07936<br />

SO ORDERED,<br />

Honora6r6 S hwy Klein Heitler<br />

APR 1520<strong>11</strong><br />

,


536.07703/AJM<br />

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW<br />

COUNTY OF NEW YORK<br />

IN RE: NEW YORK CITY<br />

ASBESTOS LITIGATION :<br />

This document relates to:<br />

RUDOLPH BIBOW,<br />

YORK<br />

NY CAL<br />

TAS PART 30<br />

(Honorable Sherry Klein Heitler)<br />

Index No, :<br />

VS .<br />

Plaintiff,<br />

(January 20<strong>11</strong> Monthly FIFO<br />

Group)<br />

Trial<br />

JNITED CONVEYOR CORPORATION,<br />

2t al.,<br />

Defendants.<br />

NO OPPOSITION<br />

SUMMARY JUD(;MENT MOTION<br />

AN13 ORDER<br />

WHEREFORE, defendant,<br />

United Conveyor Corporation, ..ereby<br />

n<br />

requests summary judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to<br />

:ivil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212, dismissing plaintiff's<br />

romplaint against defendant, United Conveyor Corporation, with<br />

rrejudice, and there being no opposition thereto.<br />

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and<br />

rossclaims against defendant, United Conveyor Corporation, be and the<br />

- -<br />

arne are hereby dismissed wit<br />

without costs.<br />

APR 2 6 20<strong>11</strong><br />

URPHY , GAROFALO<br />

& FLINN<br />

00 Broadway Attorneys for Defendant,<br />

ew York, New York 10003<br />

United Conveyor Corporation<br />

72 Eagle Rock Avenue, Suite 350<br />

, Box 438<br />

t Hanover, New Jersey 07936<br />

SO ORDERED,


536.07703/AJM<br />

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK<br />

COUNTY OF NEW YORK<br />

IN RE: NEW YORK CITY<br />

NYCAL<br />

ASBESTOS LITIGATION : IAS PART 30<br />

(Honorable Sherry Klein Heitler)<br />

This document relates to:<br />

BERTRAND E. LINDSEY,<br />

: Index No.:<br />

2-y<br />

Plaintiff,<br />

: (January 20<strong>11</strong> Monthly FIFO Trial<br />

VS . : Group)<br />

JNITED CONVEYOR CORPORATIONf<br />

?t al., : NO OPPOSITION<br />

: SUMMARY JUDGMENT MOTION<br />

Defendants. : AND ORDER<br />

WHEREFORE:,<br />

defendant, United Conveyor Corporation, hereby<br />

-equests summary judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to<br />

livil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212, dismissing plaintiff’s<br />

‘omplaint against defendant, United Conveyor Corporation, with<br />

rejudice, and there being no opposition thereto.<br />

ORDEFlED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and<br />

rossclaims against defendant, United Conveyor Corporation,<br />

ame are hereby dismissed with prejudice and wi6hout.’&&?s.<br />

rn<br />

T;z<br />

and the<br />

, I I )<br />

2, ,j zQI~<br />

4ttorneys for Plain<br />

700 Broadway Attorneys for Defendant,<br />

\Jew York, New York 10003<br />

United Conveyor Corporation<br />

72 Eagle Rock Avenue, Suite 350<br />

P.O. Box 438<br />

East Hanover, New Jersey 07936<br />

SO ORDERED,


SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK<br />

ALL COUNTIES WITHIN NEW YORK CITY<br />

_____________________________________ -X<br />

IN RE: NEW YORK COUNTY<br />

ASBESTOS LITIGATION<br />

___________________f_____________f____<br />

X<br />

This Document Relates to:<br />

Thomas J. Sheehan,<br />

NYCAL<br />

I.A.S. Part 30<br />

(Judge Heitler)<br />

Index NO.: 120770/01<br />

A.C. Ei<br />

- against -<br />

S., Inc., et al.,<br />

Plaintiff,<br />

NO ciPPOSITION<br />

SUMMARY JUDGMENT<br />

MOTION AND ORDER<br />

Inc., hereby requests<br />

summary judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil<br />

Practice Law and Rules Section 83212, dismissing plaintiffs’<br />

Complaint against defendant Goulds Pumps Inc., with prejudice,<br />

and there being no opposition thereto,<br />

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, a<strong>11</strong> claims<br />

and cross claims against defendant Goulds Pumps Inc., be<br />

dismissed with prejudice and without costs.<br />

Dated:<br />

Brooklyn, New York<br />

Attorneys for Plaintiff<br />

Attorneys for Defendant<br />

Thomas J. Sheehan<br />

Goulds Pumps Inc.<br />

700 Broadway, 6th Floor 177 Montague Street<br />

New York, New York 10003 Brooklyn, New York <strong>11</strong>201<br />

So Ordered:<br />

ile No.: 67g-&&<br />

E D<br />

APR 2 6 20<strong>11</strong>


------------ff-ff-f-_fl------------------<br />

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK<br />

ALL COUNTIES WITHIN NEW YORK CITY<br />

X NYCAL<br />

IN RE: NEW YORK COUNTY I.A.S. Part 30<br />

ASBESTOS LITIGATION<br />

(Judge Heitler)<br />

..................................... -X<br />

This Document Relates to: Index No.: 120770/01<br />

Thomas J. Sheehan,<br />

Plaintiff,<br />

- against - NO OPPOSITION<br />

A.C. & S., Inc., et al.,<br />

SUMMARY JUDGMENT<br />

MOTION AND ORDER<br />

Defendants.<br />

-X<br />

WHEREFORE, defendant Burnham LLC, hereby requests surnrnar<br />

judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practic<br />

Law and Rules Section 83212, dismissing plaintiffs' Complain<br />

against defendant Burnham LLC, with prejudice, and there beinl<br />

no opposition thereto,<br />

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claim<br />

and cross claims against defendant Burnham LLC, be dismissel<br />

with prejudice and without costs.<br />

Dated:<br />

Breoklyn, New York<br />

, 20<strong>11</strong><br />

Weitz & Luxenberg, P.C.<br />

Attorneys for Plaintiff<br />

Thomas J. Sheehan<br />

700 Broadway, 6th Floor<br />

New York, New York 10003<br />

So Ordered:<br />

Defendant<br />

Burnham LLC<br />

177 Montague Street<br />

Brooklyn,<br />

UT File NO. : ?lO84-2528<br />

APR 2 6 20<strong>11</strong>


536.07695/AJM<br />

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK<br />

COUNTY OF NEW YORK<br />

IN RE: NEW YORK CITY<br />

ASBESTOS LITIGATION :<br />

This document relates to:<br />

NATALE V. GRILLO,<br />

NY CAL<br />

IAS PART 30<br />

(Honorable Sherry Klein Heitler)<br />

Index No. :<br />

vs *<br />

Plaintiff,<br />

(January 20<strong>11</strong> Monthly FIFO Trial<br />

Group)<br />

iTCu'iTbZl CSi


WHEREFORE, defendant Goulds Pumps Inc. hereby requests summary judgment in the aboveentitled<br />

case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212, dismissing plaintiff's complaint<br />

against defendant Goulds Pumps Inc.. with prejudice, and there being no opposition thereto,<br />

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against defendant<br />

Goulds Pumps Inc., be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and without costs.<br />

Dated: New York, New York<br />

Attorney for Plaintiff<br />

LEVY, PHILLIPS & KONIGSBERG, LLP<br />

800 Third Avenue, 1 lth Floor<br />

New York, New York 10022<br />

CULLEN & DYKMAN LLP<br />

SO ORDERED,<br />

Hon. Sherry K. Heitler<br />

002239<strong>04</strong>. WPD


SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK<br />

COUNTY OF NEW YORK<br />

In Re: NEW YORK CITYASBESTOS LITIGATION<br />

Index No.: 01/121697<br />

GEORGE RENZ,<br />

Plaintiff( s),<br />

NO OPPOSITION<br />

SUMMARY JUDGMENT<br />

- against - MOTION<br />

AC and S, WC., (ARMSGTRONG<br />

CONTRACTING & SUPPLY) et al.,<br />

Defendants.<br />

WHEREFORE, Defendant WEIL-MCLAIN COMPANY, INC., hereinafter ("WEIL-<br />

MCLAN') hereby requests Summary Judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil<br />

Practice Law and Rules Section 3212, dismissing plaintiff's complaint against Defendant Weil-<br />

McLain with prejudice, and there being no opposition thereto,<br />

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against<br />

Defendant, Weil-McLain be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and without costs<br />

to either party.<br />

(%2JjK ,20<strong>11</strong><br />

Erica Cesaro, Esq.<br />

Levy Phillips<br />

800 Third Ave. 13th Floor<br />

New York, NY 10022<br />

SO ORDERED,<br />

SEGAL McCAMBRIDGE<br />

SINGER & MAHONEY, LTD.<br />

Attorneys for Defendant<br />

Weil-McLain<br />

850 Third Avenue, Suite <strong>11</strong>00 Go'<br />

New York, NY 10022<br />

(212) 651-7500<br />

itler<br />

p R 2 6 zo'


SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK<br />

COUNTY OF NEW YORK<br />

GEORGE RENZ, et al.,<br />

Plaintiff's,<br />

: NYCAI,<br />

: I.A.S. Part 30<br />

: (Hon. Sherry Klein Heitler)<br />

-against-<br />

: Index No: 12 1 697-0 1<br />

A.C. &L S., INC., et al.,<br />

Ikfendants.<br />

NO-OPPOSITION SUMMARY<br />

: JUDGMENT MOTlON AND ORDER<br />

above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Sectioii 3212, dismissing<br />

plaintiff's complaint against CRANE C:O. with prejudice, and there being no opposition thereto,<br />

ORDEKED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against<br />

CRANE CO. be, and the same are hereby, disniissed with prejudice and without costs.<br />

LEVY 'PHILLIPS & KONIGSBEKG, LLP<br />

Attorneys for Plaiiitiff(s)<br />

800 Third Avenue<br />

New York, NY 10022<br />

(2 12) 605-6200<br />

SO ORDERED.<br />

Hon.<br />

cl n ,A -I---<br />

CRhE C'O.<br />

599 Lexington Avenue<br />

Ncw York, NY 10022-<br />

(212) 536 -3900


SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK<br />

ALL COUNTIES WITHIN NEW YORK CITY<br />

lrl_l--llll---------_l------------------<br />

X NYCAL<br />

IN RE: NEW YORK COUNTY I.A.S. Part 30<br />

ASBESTOS LITIGATION<br />

(Judge Heitlex)<br />

...................................... X<br />

-<br />

This Document Relates to:<br />

Index No.:121697/01<br />

George Renz,<br />

NO-OPPOSITION<br />

Plaintiff,<br />

SUMMARY JUDQMENT<br />

- against -<br />

GOULDS PUMPS, INC.,<br />

et al.,<br />

WHEREFORE, defendant GOULDS PUMPS, INC. , hereby requests<br />

summary judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil<br />

Practice Law and Rules Section 83212, dismissing plaintiffs’<br />

Complaint against defendant GOULDS PUMPS, INC., with prejudice,<br />

and there being no opposition thereto,<br />

ORDERED, that upon natice to all co-defendants, all claims<br />

and cross claims against defendant QOULDS PUMPS, INC., be<br />

dismissed with prejudice and without coets.<br />

q A G k l y n , Ne; ;!<br />

4 I1<br />

Erica Cesaro, Esq.<br />

Levy, Philips & Konigsberg<br />

Attorneys for Plaintiff<br />

Cullen and Dykman, LLP<br />

Attorneys for DefeIIdantApfj 2 20<strong>11</strong><br />

George Renz GOULD$ PUMPS, INC.<br />

800 Third Avenue<br />

177 Montague Street<br />

Brooklyn, New York <strong>11</strong>2d%-bl’i ’YO1<br />

New York, NY 10022 (718) ,855-9000 COUNTYCLERK’SOFFICIi<br />

(212) 605-6333 &d Our Fil.9 NO. :6754-6483<br />

So Ordered: 3<br />

Han . Sher’ry K. HeiCler


SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK<br />

COUNTY OF NEW YORK<br />

IN RE:<br />

NEW YORK CITY<br />

ASBESTOS LIT1 GAT1 ON<br />

I.A.S. Part 30<br />

(Heitler, J.)<br />

This Document Relates to:<br />

FRANK M. BARBERA AS PERSONAL<br />

REPRESENTATIVE FOR THE ESTATE OF FRANK<br />

S. BARBERA<br />

INDEX NO.: 01-121734<br />

NO OPPOSITION<br />

SUMMARY JUDGMENT<br />

MOTION AND ORDER<br />

against<br />

A.C. AND S. INC. ET AL.<br />

WHEREFORE, defendant, Kohler Co., hereby requests summary judgment in the<br />

above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212, dismissing plaintiffs'<br />

complaint against defendant, Kohler Co., with prejudice, and there being no opposition thereto,<br />

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against<br />

defendant, Kohler Co., be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and without costs.<br />

DATED:<br />

NEW YORK, New York<br />

HOAGLAND, LONGO, MORAN<br />

WEITZ & LUXENBERG<br />

DUNST & DOUKAS, LLP<br />

Attorneys for Plaintiff (s),<br />

Attorneys for Defendant, FRANK M. BARBERA as Personal<br />

Kohler Cob Representative for the Estate of FRANK S.<br />

40 Paterson Street - PO Box 480 BARBERA<br />

New Brunswick, New Jersey 08903 k, New York, 10003<br />

HOAQLAM), LONGO<br />

MORAN, DUNST 8<br />

DWKAS, LLP<br />

ATTORNEYS dT LAW<br />

NORTH JERSEY<br />

40 PATERSON ST<br />

PO BOX 480<br />

NWVBRUNSWIC<strong>11</strong>. NJ<br />

SOUTH JERSEY<br />

701 WILTSEY'S MILL RD<br />

SUITE 2M<br />

HAMONTON. NJ<br />

SO ORDERED:<br />

Hon. Sherk Klein '<br />

L E D<br />

APR 2 6 2071<br />

NEW YORK<br />

COUNTY CLERK'S OFF\@


SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK<br />

COUNTY OF NEW YORK<br />

WHEREFORE, defendant Patterson-Kelley Company, sued herein as Patterson-Kelley<br />

Division, hereby requests summary judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil<br />

Practice Law and Rules Section 3212, dismissing plaintiffs complaint against defendant<br />

Patterson-Kelley Division with prejudice, and there being no opposition thereto,<br />

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against<br />

defendant Patterson-Kelley Division, be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and<br />

without costs.<br />

Dated: New York, NY<br />

By:<br />

WEITZ & LUXENBERG, P.C.<br />

Attorneys for Plaintiff<br />

180 Maiden Lane<br />

New York, NY 10038<br />

(212) 558-5500<br />

SO ORDERED,<br />

NIXON PEABODY LLP<br />

Attorneys for Defendant,<br />

Patterson-Kelley Corn any<br />

Key Towers at Fo$&'lb<br />

40 Fountain Plaza, uite 500<br />

Buffalo, NY 14202<br />

(716)853-8100 APR 'O'<br />

p.\EW YORK<br />

C.u~n CLERK'S OFFICE<br />

APR 15 20<strong>11</strong><br />

13409973.1


SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK<br />

COIJN‘I’Y OF NEW YORK<br />

PATRICK MOONEY and ARLENE W<br />

MOONEY,<br />

A.C. & S., INC., et al.,<br />

-against-<br />

PI ain t i ffs,<br />

. NYCAL<br />

: I.A.S. Part 30<br />

: (Hon. Sherry Klein I Icitler)<br />

: Index No(s): 124089-01<br />

: NO-OPPOSITION SUMMARY<br />

’ ,JUDGMENT MOTION AND ORDER<br />

above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212, dismissing<br />

plaintiffs’ complaint against CRANE CO. with prejudice, and there being no opposition thereto,<br />

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against<br />

CRANE CO. be, and the same are hereby, dismissed with prejudice and without costs.<br />

NIGSBERG, L1,P<br />

Attorneys for Plaintiff(s)<br />

800 Third Avenue<br />

*YL!<br />

i Alford Kneis, Esq.<br />

F\LED<br />

New Y ork, NY 10022 599 Lexington Avenuc 2D77<br />

(212) 60.5-6200 New York, NY 10022-6030 aPR<br />

SO OKDERGD,


SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK<br />

COUNTY OF NEW YORK<br />

WHEREFORE, defendant Patterson-Kelley Company, sued herein as Patterson-Kelley<br />

Division, hereby requests summary judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil<br />

Practice Law and Rules Section 3212, dismissing plaintiffs complaint against defendant<br />

Patterson-Kelley Division with prejudice, and there being no opposition thereto,<br />

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against<br />

defendant Patterson-Kelley Division, be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and<br />

without costs.<br />

f<br />

hiULcu\ hil~<br />

, Esq.<br />

WEITZ & LUXENBERG, P.C.<br />

Attorneys for Plaintiff<br />

By: ??!!<br />

Samuel Goldblatt, Es .<br />

Benjamin R. Dwyer sq.<br />

NIXON PEABODY LLP<br />

Attorneys for Defendant,<br />

180 Maiden Lane Patterson-Kelley Company<br />

New York, NY 10038<br />

Key Towers at Fountain Plaza<br />

40 Fountain Plaza, S<br />

Buffalo, NY 14202<br />

__,"_^


SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK<br />

ALL COUNTIES WITHIN NEW YORX CITY<br />

........................................ X<br />

IN RE:<br />

NEW YORK COUNTY<br />

ASBESTOS LITIGATION<br />

_I-ll__ll_l---_f____------------------<br />

This Document Relates to:<br />

RICHARD GRABINSKY,<br />

- against -<br />

A,C. & S. TNC,, et al.,<br />

Plaintiff,<br />

X<br />

NY CAL<br />

I.A.S, Part 30<br />

(Judge Hei t ler 1<br />

Index N0.:100373/02<br />

NO-OPPOSITION<br />

SUMMARY JUDGMENT<br />

MOTION AND QRD ER<br />

WHEREFORE, defendant BURNHAM, LLC, hereby requests summar)<br />

judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Lar<br />

and Rules Section 53212, dismissing plaintiffs' Complaint against<br />

defendant; BURNNAM, LLC, with prejudice, and there being nc<br />

opposition thereto,<br />

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims am<br />

cross claims against defendant BURNHAM, LLC, be dismissed wit1<br />

TLag<br />

prejudice and without costs.<br />

Ne: ;:<br />

GSbLCk\j Qsw2 I<br />

Esq*<br />

Levy Phillips & Konigsberg<br />

Attorneys for Plaintiff<br />

X ICHARW GRABINSKY<br />

800 Third Avenue,llth Floor<br />

New York, New York 10022<br />

So Ordered:<br />

Cullen and Dykman LLP<br />

Attorneys for Defendant<br />

BURNKAM, LLC<br />

177 Montague Street<br />

Brooklyn, New York<br />

(718) 855-9000<br />

UT File No. :<strong>11</strong>084-249ap~ 20,,<br />

NEW YORK<br />

COUNTY CLERK'S<br />

CE'


SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK<br />

COUNTY OF NEW YORK<br />

IN RE:<br />

NEW YORK CITY<br />

ASBESTOS LITIGATION<br />

CHARLES CARUSO SR.<br />

NYCAL<br />

I.A.S. Part 30<br />

(Heitler, S.)<br />

Index No. 02- 10<strong>04</strong>6 1<br />

NO OPPOSITION<br />

SUMMARY<br />

JUDGMENT<br />

MOTION AND ORDER<br />

WHEREFORE, defendant Patterson-Kelley Company, su<br />

d herein as Patterson-Kellel<br />

Division, hereby requests summary judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil<br />

Practice Law and Rules Section 3212, dismissing plaintiff's complaint against defendant<br />

Patterson-Kelley Division with prejudice, and there being no opposition thereto,<br />

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against<br />

defendant Patterson-Kelley Division, be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and<br />

without costs.<br />

By:<br />

WEITZ & LUXENBERG, P.C.<br />

Attorneys for Plaintiff<br />

180 Maiden Lane<br />

New York, NY 1003 8<br />

Benjamin R. Dwyer Esq.<br />

NIXON PEABODY LLP<br />

Attorneys for Defendant,<br />

Patterson-Kelley<br />

Key Towers at F<br />

&TXAE D<br />

(212) 558-5500 40 Fountain Plaza, Suite 500<br />

Buffalo, NY 14202 APR 20,,<br />

(716) 853-8100<br />

SO ORDERED,<br />

Hon. Sherry Klein Heitler<br />

iFd \"ORB.;<br />

COUNTY CLERK'S OFF=*<br />

13409973.1


TMc:CCCjpk)<br />

3123<strong>11</strong> 1<br />

INDEX NO.<br />

1 0 1 08 8/02<br />

ASSIGNED TO:<br />

HON. SHERRY KLEIN HEITLER<br />

FRANK PERRY<br />

NO OPPOSITION SUMMARY<br />

JUDGMENT MOTION AND<br />

ORDER<br />

WHEREFORE, defendant Consolidated Edison Company of New York, Inc.<br />

hereby requests summary judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law<br />

and Rules Section 3212, dismissing plaintiff's complaint against defendant Consolidated Edison<br />

Company of New York, Inc. with prejudice, and there being no opposition thereto,<br />

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross-claims<br />

against defendant Consolidated Edison Company of New York, Inc., be and the same are hereby<br />

dismissed with prejudice and without costs.<br />

Dated: New York, New York<br />

Jo6dRichmond, Esq.<br />

WEITZ & LUXENBERG, P.C.<br />

Attorneys for Plaintiff<br />

700 Broadway<br />

New York, NY 10003 5<br />

1<br />

York, Inc.<br />

4 Irving Place<br />

York, NY 100<br />

08b E D<br />

SO ORDERED: APR 2 6 20<strong>11</strong><br />

Our File No<br />

S-7422-0 1<br />

15 20<strong>11</strong><br />

NEW YORK<br />

COUNTY CLERK'S OFFIe


536.09778/AJM<br />

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK<br />

COUNTY OF NEW YORK<br />

IN RE: NEW YORK CITY<br />

NYCAL<br />

ASBESTOS LITIGATION : IAS PART 30<br />

(Honorable Sherry Klein Heitler)<br />

This document relates to:<br />

JAMES R. FLEMING, Deceased,<br />

: Index No. :<br />

vs "<br />

Plaintiff ,<br />

(January 20<strong>11</strong> Monthly FIFO Trial<br />

Group)<br />

UNITED CONVEYOR CORPORATION,<br />

et al. ,<br />

Defendants ,<br />

NO OPPOSITION<br />

SUMMARY JUDGMENT MOTION<br />

: AND ORDER<br />

WHEREFOFE,<br />

defenda'nt, United Conveyor Corporation, hereby<br />

requests summary judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to<br />

livil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212, dismissing plaintiff's<br />

lomplaint<br />

against defendant, United Conveyor Corporation, with<br />

xejudice, and there being no opposition thereto.<br />

ORDERED,<br />

that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and<br />

:rossclairns against defendant, United Conveyor Corporation, be and the<br />

;ame are hereby dismissed with pre<br />

IATED : 3 '- ?fN //<br />

APR 2 6 20<strong>11</strong><br />

hout costs.<br />

lEITZ & LUXENBERE<br />

GAROFALO<br />

,ttorneys for Plaintiff<br />

& FLINN<br />

'00 Broadway Attorneys for Defendant,<br />

lew York, New York 10003<br />

United Conveyor Corporation<br />

72 Eagle Rock Avenue, Suite 350<br />

P.O. Box 438<br />

East Hanover, New Jersey 07936<br />

0 ORDERED,


536.10564/AJM<br />

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK<br />

COUNTY OF NEW YORK<br />

IN RE: NEW YORK CITY : NYCAL<br />

ASBESTOS LITIGATION : IAS PART 30<br />

(Honorable Sh<br />

This document relates to:<br />

: Index No. :<br />

RAYMOND J. HICKEY,<br />

:y Klein Heitl<br />

vs .<br />

Plaintiff,<br />

: (January 20<strong>11</strong> Monthly FIFO Trial<br />

: Group)<br />

UNITED CONVEYOR CORPORATION, : NO OPPOSITION<br />

et al. , : SUMMARY JUDGMENT MOTION<br />

: AND ORDER<br />

Defendants.<br />

WHEREFORE,<br />

defendant, United ' Conveyor Corporation, hereby<br />

requests summary judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to<br />

Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212, dismissing plaintiff's<br />

Complaint against defendant, United Conveyor Corporation, with<br />

prejudice, and there being no opposition thereto.<br />

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and<br />

zrossclaims against defendant, United Conveyor Corporation, be and the<br />

same are hereby dismissed with Dwitbout costs *<br />

GARRITY, GFLAHAM, MURPHY , GAROFALO<br />

Zttorneys for Plaintiff<br />

700 Broadway Attorneys for Defendant,<br />

\Tew York, New York 10003<br />

United Conveyor Corporation<br />

72 Eagle Rock Avenue, Suite 350<br />

P.O. Box 438<br />

East Hanover, New Jersey 07936<br />

SO ORDERED,


SUPREME COUK‘I’ OF ‘I’HE STATE OF NEW YORK<br />

COIJN’I’Y OF NEW YORK<br />

’ NYCAL<br />

CAKOL E. ANGELONE, Iiidividually and as<br />

’ I.A.S. Part 30<br />

Executrix ol’the Estate of RUSSELL ANGELONE, : (I-,oll.<br />

Heil,er)<br />

et al.,<br />

Plaintiffs,<br />

* Index No: 1<strong>04</strong>919-02<br />

A.C. & S., INC., et al.,<br />

-against-<br />

: NO-OPPOSITION SUMMARY<br />

: JUDGMENT MOTION AND ORDER<br />

Defendants.<br />

________________________________________-----------------~----~-~<br />

x<br />

WHEREFORE, defendant CRANE CO., on behalf’of named defendants CRANE CO.,<br />

CRANE PUMPS & SYSTEMS, INC. and WEINMAN PUMPS, division of Crane Pumps &<br />

Systems, Inc. (“CRANE CO.”), hereby requests summary judgment in thc above-entitled case,<br />

pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 32 12, dismissing plaintiffs’ complaint against<br />

CKAN E C‘O. with prejudice, and there being no opposition thereto,<br />

ORDERED, that upoii notice to all co-defendants, all claim and cross claims against<br />

C‘KANE CO. be, and the same are hereby, dismissed with prejudice and without costs.<br />

Attorneys for Plaintiff(s)<br />

800 Third Avenue<br />

New York, NY 10022<br />

599 Lexington Avenue<br />

(212) 605-6200 w York, NY 10022-6030<br />

SO ORDERED,


I NO.<br />

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK<br />

ALL COUNTIES WITHIN NEW YORK CITY<br />

----------____l--llllr_____________lr_<br />

X NYCAL<br />

IN RE: NEW YORK COUNTY I.A.S. Part 30<br />

ASBESTOS LITIGATION<br />

(Judge Heitler)<br />

-I--l-t------r-r-ll___l__ll__l___f____<br />

X<br />

This Document Relates To: Index<br />

-<br />

No.: 1<strong>04</strong>919/02<br />

CAROL E. ANGELONE, as Executrix of<br />

the Estate of RUSSELL ANGELONE,<br />

NO-OPP081TION<br />

Plaintiff,<br />

SlJMMARY JUDGMENT<br />

- againet -<br />

GOULDS PUMPS, INC., et al,,<br />

WHEREFOREf defendant GOULDS PUMPS, INC., hereby requests<br />

summary judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil<br />

Practice Law and Rules Section 83212, dismissing plaintiffs'<br />

Complaint against defendant GOULDS PUMPS, INC., with prejudice,<br />

and there being no opposition thereto,<br />

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims<br />

and cros8 claima againet defendant GOULDS PUMPS, INC., be<br />

FC??,,<br />

dismissed with prejudice and without costs,<br />

,New York 20<strong>11</strong><br />

Erica Cesaro, Esq.<br />

Levy, Philips & Konigsberg Cullen and Dykman, LLP<br />

Attorneys for Plaintiff Attorneys for Defendant<br />

Ru~sell Anqelone<br />

-<br />

GOULDS PUMPS, INC. APR 2 6 20<strong>11</strong><br />

800 Third Avenue<br />

177 Montague Street<br />

New York, NY 10022<br />

Brooklyn, New York <strong>11</strong>201 NEW yORt,'<br />

(212) 605-6333<br />

:6754-740<br />

(718) 855-9000 eOUNlY CLERK'S Clr r IGI<br />

So Ordered:<br />

APR 1520<strong>11</strong>


SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK<br />

COUNTY OF NEW Y ON<br />

-7<br />

MOTION ANR ORDER<br />

WHEREFORE, defendant Patterson-Kelley Company, sued herein as Patterson-Kelley<br />

I<br />

Division, hereby requests summary judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil<br />

Practice Law and Rules Section 3212, dismissing plaintiffs complaint against defendant<br />

Patterson-Kelley Division with prejudice, and there being no opposition thereto,<br />

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against<br />

defendant Patterson-Kelley Division, be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and<br />

without costs,<br />

Dated: New York, NY<br />

Dana Northcraft, Esq.<br />

WEITZ & LUXENBERG, P.C.<br />

Attorneys for Plaintiff<br />

180 Maiden Lane<br />

New York, NY 10038<br />

(212) 558-5500<br />

- ' .VI..>_<br />

By:<br />

Samuel Goldblatt, Es&<br />

Benjamin R. Dwyer Esq.<br />

NIXON PEABODY LLP<br />

Attorneys for Defendant,<br />

Patterson-Kelle y Com<br />

Key Towers at Founta<br />

40 Fountain Plaza, Sui<br />

Buffalo, NY 14202<br />

..-. . (716) 853-8100 APR 2 6 20"<br />

SO ORDERE pi;i$j y9RK<br />

Hon. Sherry Klein Heitler cour\r-iy CLERK'S OFFICE<br />

13381246.1 APR 1520<strong>11</strong>


536.10562/AJM<br />

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK<br />

COUNTY OF NEW YORK<br />

IN RE: NEW YORK CITY<br />

NYCAL<br />

ASBESTOS LITIGATION : IAS PART 30<br />

(Honorable Sherry K-iin Heitler)<br />

This document relates to:<br />

CARMELO A. FICALORA,<br />

: Index No.: 120388<br />

vs *<br />

Plaintiff,<br />

c<br />

: (January 20<strong>11</strong> Monthly FIFO Trial<br />

: Group)<br />

JNITED CONVEYOR CORPORATION, : NO OPPOSITION<br />

st al. , : SUMMARY JUDGMENT MOTION<br />

: AND ORDER<br />

Defendants.<br />

WHEREFORE,<br />

defendant, United Conveyor Corporation, hereby<br />

requests summary judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to<br />

livil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212, dismissing plaintiff's<br />

lomplaint against defendant, United Conveyor Corporation, with<br />

rejudice, and there being no opposition thereto.<br />

ORDERED,<br />

that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and<br />

!rossclaims against defendant, United Conveyor Corporation, be and the<br />

lame are hereby dismissed with pr<br />

IATED : lfl&p!, V, 7 0 I /<br />

ast Hanover New Jersey<br />

hout costs.<br />

EITZ & LUXENBERG<br />

ttorneys for Plaintiff<br />

& FLINN<br />

00 Broadway Attorneys for Defendant,<br />

ew York, New York 10003<br />

United Conveyor Corporation<br />

72 Eagle Rock Avenue, Suite 350<br />

P.O. Box 438<br />

East Hanover, New Jersey 07936<br />

0 ORDERED,


536.10562/AJM<br />

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF<br />

COUNTY OF NEW YORK<br />

JEW YOR<br />

IN RE: NEW YORK CITY<br />

ASBESTOS LITIGATION :<br />

This document relates to:<br />

NYCAL<br />

IAS PART 30<br />

(Honorable Sherry Klein Heitler)<br />

ANGEL0 T. D’AGOSTINO,<br />

vs .<br />

Plaintiff,<br />

(January 20<strong>11</strong> Monthly FIFO Trial<br />

Group)<br />

JTJITEI? CDWJEVOR CORP9FATI@l’?,<br />

zt al. ,<br />

Defendants.<br />

NO BEJPQSITION<br />

SUMMARY JUDGMENT MOTION<br />

AND ORDER<br />

WHEREFORE,<br />

defendant, United Conveyor Corporation, hereby<br />

requests summary judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to<br />

livil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212, dismissing plaintiff’s<br />

*omplaint against defendant, United Conveyor Corporation, with<br />

rejudice, and there being no opposition thereto.<br />

ORDERED,<br />

that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and<br />

irossclaims against defendant, United Conveyor Corporation, be<br />

,ame are hereby dismissed with prejudice and withoutteo<br />

zp7<br />

e<br />

lATED :<br />

v *‘Y/ ,,, v- - --<br />

EITZ & LUXENBERG<br />

GARRITY, GRAHAM, MURPHY, GAROFALO<br />

ttorneys for Plaintiff<br />

& FLINN<br />

00 Broadway Attorneys for Defendant,<br />

ew York, New York 10003<br />

United Conveyor Corporation<br />

72 Eagle Rock Avenue, Suite 350<br />

**.--.E 0 * Box 438<br />

East Hanover, New Jersey 07936<br />

0 ORDERED,<br />

Honorable Sherry Klein Heitler


TMc:CC(jpk)<br />

3123<strong>11</strong> 1<br />

SUPREME COURT : ALL COUNTIES<br />

WHEREFORE, defendant Consolidated Edison Company of New York, Inc.<br />

hereby requests summary judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law<br />

and Rules Section 3212, dismissing plaintiffs complaint against defendant Consolidated Edison<br />

Company of New York, Inc. with prejudice, and there being no opposition thereto,<br />

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross-claims<br />

against defendant Consolidated Edison Company of New York, Inc., be and the same are hereby<br />

dismissed with prejudice and without costs.<br />

Dated: New York, New York<br />

Y/Jl/l<br />

WEITZ & LUXENBERG, P.C.<br />

Attorneys for Plaintiff<br />

700 Broadway<br />

New York, NY 100035<br />

York, Inc.<br />

4 Irving Place<br />

NewYork,NY<br />

SO ORDERED: ApR 2 6 20"<br />

Our File No<br />

S-4640-02


SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK<br />

COUNTY OF NEW YORK<br />

IN RE:<br />

NEW YORK CITY<br />

ASBESTOS LITIGATION<br />

NYCAL<br />

I.A.S. Part 30<br />

(Heitler, S.)<br />

Index No. 02- 1 10<strong>26</strong>9<br />

THIS DOCUMENT RELATES TO:<br />

CLINTON McCLOUD<br />

NO OPPOSITION<br />

SUMMARY<br />

JUDGMENT<br />

MOTION AND ORDER<br />

WHEREFORE, defendant Patterson-Kelley Company, su<br />

d herein as Patterson-Kelley<br />

Division, hereby requests summary judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil<br />

Practice Law and Rules Section 3212, dismissing plaintiff's complaint against defendant<br />

Patterson-Kelley Division with prejudice, and there being no opposition thereto,<br />

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against<br />

defendant Patterson-Kelley Division, be and the same are hereby dismissed<br />

without costs.<br />

W YORK


SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK<br />

COUNTY OF NEW YORK<br />

PHYLLIS GACH, Individually and as Proposed<br />

Executrix for the Estate of MICHAEL GACH,<br />

A.C. & S., INC., et al.,<br />

Plaintiff(s),<br />

-against-<br />

Defendants,<br />

I.A.S. Part 30<br />

(Hon. Sherry Klein Heitler)<br />

121985-99<br />

NO-OPPOSITION SUMMARY<br />

: JUDGMENT MOTION AND<br />

ORDER<br />

WHEREFORE, defendant CRANE CO. hereby requests summary judgment in the<br />

above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212, dismissing<br />

plaintiffs complaint against defendant CMNE CO. with prejudice, and there being no<br />

opposition thereto,<br />

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against<br />

defendant CRANE CO. be, and the same are hereby, dismissed with prejudice and without costs,<br />

Dated:<br />

3 \>a\ I\.<br />

Attorneys for Plaintiff(s)<br />

700 Broadway CRANE CO.<br />

New York, NY 10003<br />

(212) 558-5500 New York, NY 10022<br />

(212) 536-3900<br />

APR 2 6 2071<br />

SO ORDERED,<br />

Hon, Sherry Klein Heitler<br />

FbV VOR&<br />

cwcu i Y CLER&S oFF/a


SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK<br />

ALL COUNTIES WITHIN NEW YORK CITY<br />

___________________-------------------<br />

X NYCAL<br />

IN RE: NEW YORK COUNTY I.A.S. Part 30<br />

ASBESTOS LITIGATION<br />

(Judge Heitler)<br />

___________________-------------------<br />

X<br />

This Document Relates to: Index No.: <strong>11</strong>2375/02<br />

MICHAEL GACH<br />

NO-OPPOSITION<br />

SUMMARY JUDGMENT<br />

Plaintiff ,<br />

MOTION AND ORDER<br />

- against -<br />

WHEREFORE,<br />

defendant BURNHAM LLC, hereby requests summary<br />

judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law<br />

and Rules Section 53212, dismissing plaintiffs' Complaint against:<br />

defendant BURNHAM LLC, with prejudice, and there being no<br />

opposition thereto,<br />

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and<br />

cross claims against defendant BURNHAM LLC, be dismissed with<br />

prejudice and without costs.<br />

2 6 20<strong>11</strong>


SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK<br />

COUNTY OF NEW YORK<br />

IN RE: NEW YORK COUNTY i NYCAL<br />

ASBESTOS LITIGATION<br />

THIS DOCUMENT REFERS TO:<br />

i I.A.S. Part 30<br />

! (Heitler, J.)<br />

i Index No.: <strong>11</strong>4483/02<br />

GRACE CONTI, INDIVIDUALLY AND AS<br />

EXECUTRIX FOR THE ESTATE OF VITO<br />

CONTI, i NO OPPOSITION<br />

j SUMMARY JUDGMENT<br />

Plaintiffs, i MOTION AND ORDER<br />

-against-<br />

A. C. & S., INC., et ai.,<br />

Defendants. :<br />

WHEREFORE, defendant, Oakfaco, Inc., hereby requests summary judgment in the<br />

above entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules 8 3212, dismissing plaintiffs’<br />

complaint against defendant, Oakfaco, Inc., with prejudice in this action, and there being no<br />

opposition thereto,<br />

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, a<strong>11</strong> claims and cross claims against<br />

defendant, Oakfaco, Inc., be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and without costs.<br />

Dated: New Ywk. New York<br />

Robert Darish, Esq.<br />

Attorney for Defendant<br />

Oakfaco, Inc.<br />

Estate of Vito Conti<br />

MCG~VNEY & KLUGER, P.C.<br />

WE~TZ & LUXENBERG, P.C.<br />

80 Broad Street-Suite 2300<br />

700 Broadway<br />

New York, New York 100<strong>04</strong> NewYork,NewYork10003 APR 2 6 20<strong>11</strong><br />

(212) 509-3456<br />

h \EV/ YORK<br />

SO ORDERED,<br />

COUNTY GLERKG’S OFFICE’<br />

2571-0132<br />

N0<strong>04</strong><strong>04</strong>78-1


SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK<br />

ALL COUNTIES WITHIN NEW YORK CITY<br />

-l_l_----l--l-_--__-------------------<br />

X NYCAL<br />

IN RE: NEW YORK COUNTY I.A.S. Part 30<br />

ASBESTOS LITIGATION<br />

(Judge Heitler)<br />

X<br />

This Document Relates to: Index No.: <strong>11</strong>8207/02<br />

BERNARD SIKKAS<br />

NO-OPPOSITION<br />

SUMMARY JUDGMENT<br />

Plaintiff,<br />

MOTION AND ORDER<br />

- against -<br />

A.C. SI S., INC., et al.,<br />

Defendants.<br />

X<br />

WHEREFORE, defendant BURNHAM LLC, hereby requests summary<br />

judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law<br />

and Rules Section 53212, dismissing plaintiffs' Complaint against<br />

defendant BURNHAM LLC, with prejudice, and there being no<br />

opposition thereto,<br />

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and<br />

cross claims against defendant BURNHAM LLC, be dismissed with<br />

prejudice and without costs.<br />

Weitz & Luxenberg, P<br />

Attorneys for Plaintiff<br />

Bernard Sikkas<br />

700 Broadway, 6th Floor<br />

New York, New York 10003<br />

212-558-5500<br />

SO ORDERED:<br />

Hon. Sherry K. Heitler<br />

Attorneys for Defendant<br />

Burnham LLC<br />

177 Montague Street<br />

Brooklyn, New York <strong>11</strong>201<br />

(718) 855-9000<br />

rpl.<br />

Our File No. : Eo K<br />

APK 2 6 20<strong>11</strong><br />

NEW YORK<br />

COUNTY CLERK'S OFFICE<br />

I


--<br />

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK<br />

ALL COUNTIES WITHIN NEW YORK CITY<br />

-X NYCAL<br />

IN RE: NEW YORK COUNTY<br />

I.A.S. Part 30<br />

ASBESTOS LITIGATION<br />

(Judge Heitler)<br />

--_________________-_________________ -X<br />

This Document Relates to:<br />

Index No.: <strong>11</strong>8207/02<br />

Jeanette Sikkas, Individually and as<br />

Executrix for the Estate of Bernard<br />

Sikkas,<br />

Plaintiff,<br />

- against -<br />

NO OPPOSITION<br />

SUMMARY JUDGMENT<br />

A.C. & S., Iric., et al. ,<br />

MOTION AND ORDER<br />

Defendants.<br />

__________________-__________________ -X<br />

WHEREFORE, defendant Mario & DiBono Plastering Co. Inc.,<br />

hereby requests summary judgment in the above-entitled case,<br />

pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section §3212,<br />

dismissing plaintiffs' Complaint against defendant Mario 6<br />

DiBono Plastering Co. Inc., with prejudice, and there being nc<br />

opposition thereto,<br />

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims<br />

and cross claims against defendant Mario & DiBono Plastering Co.<br />

Inc., be dismissed with prejudice and without c osF I L E D<br />

Dated:<br />

/y<br />

,2755 w/<br />

Brooklyn, New York<br />

<strong>11</strong><strong>11</strong>7 , 20<strong>11</strong><br />

Michael Fanelli, Esq.<br />

Weitz & Luxenberg, P.C.<br />

Attorneys for Plaintiff<br />

Jeanette Sikkas, Individually Mario & DiBono Plastering Co.<br />

and as Executrix for the Estate Inc.<br />

of Bernard Sikkas<br />

177 Montague Street<br />

700 Broadway, 6th Floor Brooklyn, New York <strong>11</strong>201<br />

New York, New York 1000 (718) 855-9000<br />

Our File No.: 10924-6459<br />

So Ordered:<br />

I 6QR<br />

I t 1,5?0ll


JOAN LEVESQUE as Administratrix for the Estate of JOSEPH<br />

LEVESQUE and JOAN LEVESQUE, Individually,<br />

NYCAL<br />

I.A.S. Part 30<br />

42z><br />

Hon. Sherry Klein Heitler, J.S.C.<br />

Index No.:<br />

122034-1998<br />

-against-<br />

Plaintiffs,<br />

NO OPPOSITION SUMMARY JUDGMENT<br />

MOTION AND ORDER<br />

A.O. SMITH WATER PRODUCTS, et al. including,<br />

FOSTER WHEELER CORPORATION,<br />

Defendants.<br />

WHEREFORE, defendant FOSTER WHEELER, L.L.C. (sued herein as “FOSTER WHEELER<br />

CORPORATION”) hereby request summary judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil<br />

Practice Law and Rules Section 3212, dismissing plaintiffs’ complaint against defendant FOSTER<br />

WHEELER, L.L.C. with prejudice, and there being no opposition thereto,<br />

ORDERED, that upon notice to all ca-defendants, all claims and cross claims against defendant<br />

FOSTER WHEELER, L.L.C. be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and without costs.<br />

Weitz & Luxenberg, P.C. 5<br />

Dennis E. Vega, Esq.<br />

Sedgwick, Detert, Moran & Arnold, LLP<br />

Attorney for Plain tffs<br />

700 Broadway<br />

New York, New York 10003 /<br />

Attorneys for Foster Wheeler, L. L.C.<br />

Three Gateway Center, 12th Floor<br />

Newark, NJ 07102<br />

rn nnnrnrn<br />

1 unucncu,<br />

Hok&rry Klein Heitler<br />

NEW YORK<br />

WUWY CLERKS OFFICE‘<br />

NJ1341759vl


SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK<br />

COUNTY OF NEW YORK<br />

IN RE NEW YORK CITY ASBESTOS LITIGATION NYCAL<br />

Hon. Sherry Klein Heitler<br />

VIVIAN LAWRENCE, as Executrix for the Estate of GEORGE<br />

LAWRENCE, Deceased,<br />

"against-<br />

Plaintiff(s),<br />

X<br />

X<br />

Index No. 1<strong>26</strong>776-2002<br />

NO OPPOSITION<br />

SUMMARY JUDGMENT MOTION AND<br />

ORDER<br />

AMERICAN STANDARD, INC. et al., including<br />

FOSTER WHEELER, LLC,<br />

Defendants.<br />

X<br />

WHEREFORE, defendant FOSTER WHEELER, LLC hereby requests summary judgment in the<br />

above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212, dismissing plaintiffs'<br />

complaint against defendant FOSTER WHEELER, LLC with prejudice, and there being no opposition<br />

thereto,<br />

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against defendant<br />

FOSTER WHEELER, LLC be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and without costs.<br />

Sedgwick, Detert, Moran & Arnold LLP<br />

Attorneys Three Gateway for Foster Center, Wheeler,<br />

12'h F $lLED<br />

or<br />

15 20<strong>11</strong><br />

APR 2 6 20<strong>11</strong><br />

NEW YORK<br />

COUNTY CLERK'S OFFICE


NYCAL<br />

I.A.S. Part 30<br />

Hon. Sherry Klein Heitler, J.S.C.<br />

COSMA LERUZIC, as Executrix for the Estate of PETER F.<br />

LERUZIC and COSMA LERUZIC, Individually,<br />

Index No.:<br />

121982-1999<br />

-against-<br />

Plaintiffs,<br />

NO OPPOSITION SUMMARY JUDGMENT<br />

MOTION AND ORDER<br />

A.O. SMITH WATER PRODUCTS, et al. including,<br />

FOSTER WHEELER CORPORATION,<br />

Defendants.<br />

WHEREFORE, defendant FOSTER WHEELER, L.L.C. (sued herein as “FOSTER WHEELER<br />

CORPORATION”) hereby request summary judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil<br />

Practice Law and Rules Section 3212, dismissing plaintiffs’ complaint against defendant FOSTER<br />

WHEELER, L.L.C. with prejudice, and there being no opposition thereto,<br />

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against defendant<br />

FOSTER WHEELER, L.L.C. be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and without costs.<br />

Dated:<br />

,New York, New York<br />

Frank Ortiz, Esq.<br />

Weitz & Luxenberg, P.C.<br />

Attorney for Plaint~fs<br />

700 Broadway<br />

New York, New York 1000<br />

3<br />

Sedgwick,<br />

Dennis E. Vega, Detert, Esq. Moran & Arnold, LLP<br />

Attorneys for Foster Wheeler, L. L.C.<br />

Three Gateway Center, 12fh Floor<br />

Newark, NJ 07102<br />

SO ORPERED,<br />

Hon. SheK Klei’n Heitler<br />

NEW YORK<br />

COUNTY CLERKIS OFFICE‘<br />

NJD4I 757vl


SLJPREME COURT OF 'PFIE STATE OF NEW YOK<br />

COUNTY OF NEW YORK<br />

IN E: NEW YORK COUNTY j NYCAL<br />

ASBESTOS L J TlGATl ON<br />

; 1.A.S. Part 30<br />

j (Heitler, J.)<br />

1HIS DOCUMENT R.EFERS TO:<br />

THEODORE FRASIER, EXECUTOR FOR 'THE<br />

ESTATE OF CLYDE FRASIER,<br />

0<br />

-against-<br />

A. C. & S., INC., et al,,<br />

PI ai n ti ffs,<br />

j Index No.: 124331/00 00757/03<br />

i<br />

NO OPPOSITION<br />

i SUMMARY JUDGMENT<br />

[ MOTION AND ORDER<br />

Defendants.<br />

j<br />

WHEREFORE, defendant, Treadwell Corporation, hereby requests summary judgment in<br />

the above entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules 5 3212, dismissing plaintiffs'<br />

complaint against defendant, Treadwell Corporation, with prejudice in this action, and there<br />

being no opposition thereto,<br />

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against<br />

defendant, Treadwell Corporation, be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and<br />

without costs.<br />

80 Broad Street-Suite 2300<br />

New York, New York 100<strong>04</strong><br />

(212) 509-3456<br />

WEIT2 & LUXENBERG, P.C.<br />

700 Broadway<br />

N0<strong>04</strong><strong>04</strong>78-1


SUPREME COUR’r OF ‘I’HE STATE OF NEW YORK<br />

-.-_-<br />

ASBESTOS LlTIGATl ON<br />

‘1”FIiS DOClJMENT REFERS TO:<br />

TI 1EODORE FMSIER, EXECUTOR FOR THE<br />

ESTATE OF CLYDE FKASIER,<br />

-against-<br />

Plaintiffs,<br />

; I.A.S. Part 30<br />

; (FJeitler, J.)<br />

0<br />

i Index No.: 124331/00, 100757/03<br />

[ NO OPPOSITION<br />

; SUMMARY JUDGMENT<br />

/ MOTION AND OKDER<br />

-<br />

A. C. & S., INC., et ul.,<br />

Defendants.<br />

i<br />

WHEFEFORE, defendant, Tishman Liquidating Corp., hereby requests summary<br />

judgment in the above entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules 8 3212, dismissing<br />

plaintiffs’ complaint against defendant, Tishman Liquidating Corp., with prejudice in this action,<br />

and there being no opposition thereto,<br />

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against<br />

defendant, Tishman Liquidating Corp., be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and<br />

without costs.<br />

MCG~VNEY & KLUGER, P.C.<br />

80 Broad Street-Suite 2300<br />

New York, New York 100<strong>04</strong><br />

(212) 509-3456 0<br />

SO ORDERED,<br />

WEITZ & LUXENBERG, P.C.<br />

700 Broadway<br />

New York New York 10003 APR 2 6 20<strong>11</strong><br />

NEW YORK<br />

COUNTY CLERKS OFFtCf<br />

2383-22283<br />

N0<strong>04</strong><strong>04</strong>78-1


CO1JNTY OF NEW YOKK _-- -"-- IN RE: NEW YOPX COUNTY<br />

\ NYCAL<br />

ASBESTOS LI'I'IGRTION I I.A.S. Part 30<br />

! (Heitler, J.)<br />

__I<br />

THIS DOCUMENT REFERS TO:<br />

TERRY M. KESSLER AND MARSHA<br />

KES S LEK,<br />

-against -<br />

A. C. & S., INC., et d.,<br />

Plaintiffs,<br />

i<br />

i<br />

j<br />

NO OPPOSITION<br />

SUMMARY JUDGMENT<br />

MOTION AND ORDER<br />

Defendants. !<br />

WHEREFORE, defendant, Safeguard Industrial Equipment ,Co., hereby requests<br />

summary judgment in the above entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules $ 3212,'<br />

dismissing plaintiffs' complaint against defendant, Safeguard Industrial Equipment Co., with<br />

prejudice in this action, and there being no opposition thereto,<br />

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against<br />

defendant, Safeguard Industrial Equipment Co., be and the same are hereby dismissed with<br />

prejudice and without costs.<br />

Ir""<br />

4" '.Vrbr*..*uL<br />

Safeguard Industrial Equipment Co.<br />

MCGXWY & KLUGER, P.C.<br />

80 Broad Street-Suite 2300<br />

New York, New Yoxk 100<strong>04</strong><br />

(212) 509-3456<br />

SO ORDERED,<br />

Hon. Sherry Klein Heitler<br />

Frq bj. O(t;? Eq.<br />

Attorney for Plaintiffs<br />

Carl Kroger and Carol Ann Kroger<br />

WEITZ & LUXENBERG, P.<br />

700 Broadway I<br />

New York, New York 100<br />

APR 2 6 20<strong>11</strong><br />

324-564dEP j'c'PIK<br />

COUNTY CLEHW QFFICE'<br />

I<br />

N0<strong>04</strong><strong>04</strong>78-1


SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK<br />

COUNTY OF NEW YORK<br />

IN RE: NEW YOXENTY<br />

i NYCAL<br />

ASBESTOS LITIGATlON j I.A.S. Part 30<br />

j (Heitler. J.1<br />

I ,<br />

THIS DOCUMENT mFEKS TO:<br />

j Index No..<br />

TERRY M. KESSLER AND MARSHA<br />

KESSLER,<br />

-against-<br />

Plaintiffs, j NO OPPOSITION<br />

i SUMMARY JUDGMENT<br />

! MOTION AND ORDER<br />

A. C. & S., INC., etal.,<br />

Defendants.<br />

i<br />

WHEREFORE, defendant, Tishman Liquidating Corp., hereby requests summary<br />

judgment in the above entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules 6 3212, dismissing<br />

plaintiffs' complaint against defendant, Tishman Liquidating Corp., with prejudice in this action,<br />

and there being no opposition thereto,<br />

ORDERED? that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against<br />

defendant, Tishman Liquidating Corp., be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and<br />

without costs.<br />

Dated: New York New York<br />

MCGIVNEY & UUGER, P.C.<br />

80 Broad Street-Suite 2300<br />

New York, New York 100 New York 10003<br />

(212) 509-3456<br />

2 6 20<strong>11</strong><br />

SO ORDERED,<br />

NEW YORK<br />

2 @kERK'S UFFlCE<br />

N0<strong>04</strong><strong>04</strong>78-1


S~JPREME coum OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK<br />

COUNTY OF NEW YOIIK -<br />

IN RE: NEW YOKK COUNTY<br />

! NYCAL<br />

ASBESTOS LITIGATION j I.A.S. Part 30<br />

! (Heitler, J.><br />

THIS DOCUMENT REFERS TO:<br />

TERRY M. KESSLER AND MARSHA<br />

KESSLER,<br />

-<br />

-against -<br />

A. C. & S., INC., et al.,<br />

Plaintiffs,<br />

Defendants.<br />

! NO OPPOSITION<br />

i SUMMARY JUDGMENT<br />

i MOTION AND ORlDER<br />

i<br />

WHEREFORE, defendant, Treadwell Corporation, hereby requests summary judgment in<br />

the above entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules 5 3212, dismissing plaintiffs'<br />

complaint against defendant, Treadwell Corporation, with prejudice in this action, and there<br />

being no opposition thereto,<br />

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against<br />

defendant, Treadwell Corporation, be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and<br />

without costs.<br />

Dated: New York, New York<br />

Carol M. Ternpesta, Esq.<br />

Attorney for Defendant<br />

Treadwell Corporation<br />

MCGIVNEY & KLUGER, P.C.<br />

80 Broad Street-Suite 2300<br />

New York, New York 100<strong>04</strong><br />

(212) 509-3456<br />

SO ORDERED,<br />

WElTZ & LUXENBERG, P.C.<br />

700 Broadway<br />

New York, New York 10003<br />

123@biV<br />

.;ORE<<br />

bEd qKs OFF\CE<br />

Ty C W


*A<br />

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK<br />

COUNTY OF NEW YORK<br />

IN RE:<br />

NEW YORK CITY<br />

ASBESTOS LITIGATION<br />

I.A.S. Part 30<br />

(Heitler, J.)<br />

This Document Relates to:<br />

SAM DONOFRIO<br />

against<br />

INDEX NO.: 03-107991<br />

NO OPPOSITION<br />

SUMMARY JUDGMENT<br />

MOTION AND ORDER<br />

A. 0. SMTH WATER PRODUCTS CO.. ET AL<br />

WHEREFORE, defendant, Kohler Co., hereby requests summary judgment in the<br />

above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212, dismissing plaintiffs'<br />

complaint against defendant, Kohler Co., with prejudice, and there being no opposition thereto,<br />

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against<br />

defendant, Kohler Co., be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and without costs.<br />

DATED:<br />

New York, New York<br />

3 \\-I \\\<br />

A<br />

HOAGLAND, LONGO, MORAN<br />

DUNST & DOUKAS, LLP<br />

Attorneys for Defendant,<br />

Kohler Co.<br />

40 Paterson Street - PO Box 480<br />

New Brunswick, New Jersey 08903<br />

WEITZ & LUXENBE-<br />

Attorneys for Plaintiff@),<br />

Sam Donofrio<br />

700 Broadway<br />

New York, NY 10003<br />

HOAGLAND, LONGO<br />

MORAN. DUNST 8<br />

DQUKAS, LLP<br />

ATTORNEYS AT LAW<br />

NORTH JERSEY<br />

40 PATERSON ST<br />

PO BOX 480<br />

NEW BRUNWCK. NJ<br />

SOUTH JERSEY<br />

701 VVILTSEY'S MILL RD<br />

SUITE 202<br />

HAMMONTON, NJ<br />

SO ORDERED:<br />

SHERRY KfEIN HWLER<br />

Ft<br />

APR 2 6 2821


SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK<br />

COUNTY OF NEW YORK<br />

IN RE NEW YORK ClTv ASBESTOS LITIGATION NYCAL<br />

Hon, Sherry Klein Heltler<br />

X<br />

ROBERT DOWNEY and RITA DOWNEY, Index No. 109278-2003<br />

-against-<br />

Plaintiff(s),<br />

NO OPPOSITION<br />

SUMMARY JUDGMENT MOTION AND<br />

ORDER<br />

A.O. SMITH WATER PRODUCTS et al., including<br />

FOSTER WHEELER, LLC,<br />

Defendants.<br />

WHEREFORE, defendant FOSTER WHEELER, LLC hereby requests summary judgment in the<br />

above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212, dismissing plaintiffs'<br />

complaint against defendant FOSTER WHEELER, LLC with prejudice, and there being no opposition<br />

thereto,<br />

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against defendant<br />

FOSTER WHEELER, LLC be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and without costs.<br />

Dated:<br />

New York,Jew York<br />

Joseph W.Jfelluck, Esq.<br />

Sedgwick, Detert, Moran & Arnold, LLP<br />

Attorneys for Foster Wheeler, L<br />

546 Fifth Avenue, 4'h Floor<br />

Three Gateway Center, 12fh Flo<br />

New York, NY 10036 , NJ 07102<br />

APR 2 6 20<strong>11</strong><br />

SO ORDERED,<br />

Hon. Sherry Klein Heitler, J.S.C.<br />

NEW YORK<br />

r,OUNn CLERK'S OFFICE'


SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW Y ON<br />

COUNTY OF NEW YORK<br />

NYCAL<br />

-against-<br />

Plaintifqs),<br />

Index No. 109278/03<br />

NO OPPOSITION<br />

SUMMARY JUDGMENT<br />

MOTION AND ORDER<br />

Hon. Shew Klein Heitler,<br />

LAS Part 30 ..<br />

WHEREFORE, defendant The Goodyear Tire & Rubber Company hereby<br />

requests summary judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to CPLR 3212,<br />

dismissing plaintiff's complaint against The Goodyear Tire & Rubber Company with<br />

prejudice, and there being no apposition thereto, it is hereby:<br />

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims<br />

*<br />

against The Goodyear Tire & Rubber Company be and the same are hereby dismissed<br />

with prejudice and without costs,<br />

Dated: New Yo , ET w York<br />

BELLUCR & FOX, LLP<br />

LYNCH DASKAL EMERY LLP<br />

Attorneys for Plaintiff<br />

546 5th Avenue, 4th Floor<br />

<strong>26</strong>4 West 40* Street<br />

New York, New York 10036<br />

New York, New York 10018<br />

(212) 681-1575 (212) 302-2400<br />

Dated: New York, New York<br />

SO ORDERED:


SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK<br />

ALL COUNTIES WITHIN NEW YORK CITY<br />

-_________---------I__lf______________<br />

X<br />

IN RE: NEW YORK COUNTY<br />

ASBESTOS LITIGATION<br />

......................................<br />

This Document Relates to:<br />

EDWARD L. JEMIOLO<br />

Plaintiff<br />

X<br />

NYCAL<br />

I.A.S. Part 30<br />

(Judge Heitler)<br />

Index No.: <strong>11</strong>1829/03<br />

NO-OPPOSITION<br />

SUMMARY JUDGMENT<br />

MOTION AND ORDER<br />

- against -<br />

A.C. &<br />

S., INC., et al.,<br />

WHEREFORE,<br />

defendant BURNHAM LLC,<br />

hereby requests summar<br />

judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice La<br />

and Rules Section 53212, dismissing plaintiffs' Complaint agains<br />

defendant BURNHAM LLC,<br />

with prejudice, and there being n<br />

opposition thereto,<br />

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims an<br />

cross claims against defendant BURNHAM LLC,<br />

be dismissed wit<br />

prejudice and without costs.<br />

Weitz & Luxenberg, Cullen and Dykman LLP<br />

Attorneys for Plaintiff Attorneys for Defendant<br />

Edward L. Jemiolo<br />

Burnham LLC<br />

700 Broadway, 6th Floor 177 Montague Street<br />

New York, New York 10003 Brooklyn, New York <strong>11</strong>201<br />

212-558-5500<br />

(718) 855-9000<br />

Our File No.: <strong>11</strong>08<br />

D


I<br />

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK<br />

COUNTY OF NEW YORK<br />

IN RE: NEW YORK CITY<br />

ASBESTOS LITIGATION<br />

I.A.S. Part 30<br />

(Heitler, J.)<br />

This Document Relates to:<br />

ELLA RUTH MONTONEY and DONNA JEAN<br />

WEESE as Executrix of the Estate of OSCAR<br />

FOANE MONTONEY,<br />

against<br />

A.O. SMITH WATER PRODUCTS. et al..<br />

INDEX NO.: 03-1 16300<br />

NO OPPOSITION<br />

SUMMARY JUDGMENT<br />

MOTION AND ORDER<br />

WHEREFORE, defendant, York lnternatlonal Corporation, hereby requests summary<br />

I<br />

i<br />

iudgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212,<br />

jismissing plaintiffs' complaint against defendant, York International Corporation, with prejudice,<br />

md there being no opposition thereto,<br />

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against<br />

jefendant, York International Corporation, be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice<br />

and without costs.<br />

DATED;<br />

New Brunswick, NJ<br />

1<br />

iOAGLAND, LONGO, M<br />

IUNST & DOUKAS, LLP<br />

4ttorneys for Defendant,<br />

(ork International Corporation<br />

IO Paterson Street - PO Box 480<br />

dew Brunswick, New Jersey 08903<br />

Ella Ruth Montoney and Donna Jean Weese<br />

as Executrix of the Estate of Oscar Foane<br />

io ORDERED:<br />

Honorable Sherry Klein Heitler<br />

I <strong>11</strong><strong>11</strong><strong>11</strong><strong>11</strong><strong>11</strong><strong>11</strong> 1 l <strong>11</strong><strong>11</strong>1l<strong>11</strong> l II l<br />

BU-TURF-2


SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK<br />

COUNTY OF NEW YORK<br />

IN RE NEW YORK CITY ASBESTOS LITIGATION NYCAL<br />

Hon. Sherry Klein Heitler<br />

FRED ASSOULIN, as Proposed Executor for the Estate of Index No. 103905-20<strong>04</strong><br />

SHERRY ASSOULIN and FRED ASSOULIN, Individually,<br />

NO OPPOSITION<br />

Plaintiff (s)<br />

SUMMARY JUDGMENT MOTION AND<br />

V. ORDER<br />

X<br />

X<br />

A.O. SMITH WATER PRODUCTS COMPANY et al. including<br />

FOSTER WHEELER, L.L.C.,<br />

X<br />

WHEREFORE, defendant FOSTER WHEELER, L.L.C. hereby requests summary judgment in the<br />

above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212, dismissing plaintiffs'<br />

complaint against defendant FOSTER WHEELER, L.L.C. with prejudice, and there being no opposition<br />

thereto,<br />

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against defendant<br />

FOSTER WHEELER, L.L.C. be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and without costs.<br />

1Sedgwick, Dennis E. Vega, Detert, Esq. Moran & Arnold, LLP<br />

Weitr & Luxenberg, P.C.<br />

Attorneys for Plointvfs<br />

Attorneys for foster Wheeler, 1. L.C.<br />

700 Broadway<br />

Three Gateway Center, 12fh Floor<br />

New York, NY 10003<br />

Newark, NJ 07102<br />

(212) 558-5500 (973) 242-0002<br />

SO ORDERED,<br />

"- -<br />

APR 2 6 20<strong>11</strong><br />

NEW YORK<br />

COUNTY CLERKS OFFICE'


SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK<br />

COUNTY OF NEW YORK<br />

* NYCAL<br />

LAURA FRACCALVIERI, as Administratrix for the : I.A.S, Part 3o<br />

Estate of FRANK FRACCALVIERI,<br />

: (Hon. Sherry Klein Heitler)<br />

Plaintiff( s) ,<br />

: Index No(s).: 105233-<strong>04</strong><br />

-against-<br />

A.O. SMITH WATER PRODUCTS CO., et al.,<br />

Defendants,<br />

NO-OPPOSITION SUMMARY<br />

: JUDGMENT MOTION AND<br />

: ORDER<br />

WHEREFORE, defendant CRANE CO. hereby requests summary judgment in the<br />

above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212, dismissing<br />

plaintiffs complaint against defendant CRANE CO. with prejudice, and there being no<br />

opposition thereto,<br />

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against<br />

defendant CRANE CO. be, and the same are hereby, dismissed with prejudice and without costs.<br />

Dated: 3 \30\ \\<br />

New Xork, New York<br />

Attorneys for Plaintiff(s)<br />

700 Broadway<br />

New York, NY 10003<br />

(212) 558-5500<br />

SO ORDERED,<br />

CRANE CO.<br />

599 Lexington venue APK 2 6 2"'<br />

New York, NY 10022<br />

(212) 536-3900 WRK<br />

c:OUN+r( CLERKS OFF'*


-____________-------______________t__l<br />

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK<br />

ALL COUNTIES WITHIN NEW YORK CITY<br />

X NYCAL<br />

IN RE: NEW YORK COUNTY I.A.S. Part 30<br />

ASBESTOS LITIGATION<br />

(Judge Heitler)<br />

______-------f------___I______________<br />

X<br />

This Document Relates to: Index No.: <strong>11</strong>1253/<strong>04</strong><br />

MARTIN ZUCKERMAN<br />

NO-OPPOSITION<br />

SUMMARY JUDGMENT<br />

Plaintiff,<br />

MOTION AND ORDER<br />

- against -<br />

A.O.<br />

SMITH WATER PRODUCTS CO., et al.,<br />

Defendants.<br />

---------------------------*---*------<br />

X<br />

WHEREFOREl defendant BURNHAM LLC, hereby requests summary<br />

judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to C ivil Practice LaLd<br />

and Rules Section §3212,<br />

dismissing plaintiffs' Complaint against<br />

defendant BURNHAM LLC, with prejudice, and there being no<br />

opposition thereto,<br />

ORDERED, that upon notice to a<strong>11</strong> co-defendants, all claims and<br />

cross claims against defendant BURNHAM LLC, be dismissed with<br />

prejudice and without costs.<br />

SO ORDERED: f3.<br />

I


No.:<br />

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK<br />

ALL COUNTIES WITHIN NEW YORK CITY<br />

..................................... -X<br />

IN RE: NEW YORK COUNTY<br />

ASBESTOS LITIGATION<br />

..................................... -X<br />

This Document Relates to:<br />

Valerie Zuckerman, as Executrix for the<br />

Estate of Martin Zuckerman,<br />

- against -<br />

Plaintiff,<br />

A.O. Smith Water Products Co., et al.,<br />

NYCAL<br />

I.A.S. Part 30<br />

(Judge Heitler)<br />

Index No.: <strong>11</strong>1253/<strong>04</strong><br />

NO OPPOSITION<br />

S-Y JUDGMENT<br />

MOTION AND ORDER<br />

WHEREFORE, defendant Mario &<br />

DiBono Plastering Co. Inc.,<br />

hereby requests summary judgment in the above-entitled case,<br />

pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section §3212,<br />

dismissing plaintiffs' Complaint against defendant Mario E<br />

DiBono Plastering Co. Inc., with prejudice, and there being nc<br />

opposition thereto,<br />

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claim:<br />

and cross claims against defendant Mario & DiBono Plastering Co.<br />

Inc., be dismissed with prejudice and without costs.<br />

//.


SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK<br />

COUNTY OF NEW YOFK<br />

LILLIAN P, CARPENTER, as Executrix for the<br />

Estate of GERALD CLAYTON CARPENTER,<br />

Plaintiff(s),<br />

-against-<br />

A.O. SMITH WATER PRODUCTS CO., et al.,<br />

Defendants.<br />

: NYCAL<br />

: I.A.S. Part 30<br />

: (Hon. Sherry Klein Heitler)<br />

: Index No.: <strong>11</strong>4255-<strong>04</strong><br />

: NO-OPPOSITION SUMMARY<br />

: JUDGMENT MOTION AND<br />

: ORDER<br />

WHEREFORE, defendant CRANE CO. hereby requests summary judgment in the<br />

above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 32 12, dismissing<br />

plaintiffs' complaint against defendant CRANE CO. with prejudice, and there being no<br />

opposition thereto,<br />

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against<br />

defendant CRANE CO. be, and the same are hereby, dismissed with prejudice and without casts.<br />

Dated: 3 \ >-/ \\<br />

New York, New York<br />

Kirst Alford Kneis, Esq.<br />

K& GATESLLP<br />

Attorneys for Plaintiff(s)<br />

At rneys for Defendant<br />

700 Broadway CRANE CO.<br />

New York, NY 10003<br />

599 Lexington Avenue<br />

(212) 558-5500<br />

New York, NY 10022<br />

(212) 536-3900<br />

SO ORDERED,<br />

APR 1520<strong>11</strong><br />

?"-Ob'<br />

2 6 20<strong>11</strong><br />

r ;-'jb YOHK<br />

rl' CLERKS OFF,^^


SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK<br />

ALL COUNTIES WITHIN NEW YORK CITY<br />

X NY CAL<br />

____--l-l--l___-----------------------<br />

IN RE: NEW YORK COUNTY I.A.S. Part 30<br />

ASBESTOS LITIGATION<br />

-_l_____----------lf_______________f_l<br />

X<br />

(Judge Heitler)<br />

This Document Relates to:<br />

CARL LUNDERMAN<br />

Index No.: <strong>11</strong>5493/<strong>04</strong><br />

NO-OPPOSITION<br />

SUMMARY JUDCMENT<br />

Plaintiff,<br />

MOTION AND ORDER<br />

- against -<br />

A.C. &<br />

S., INC., et al.,<br />

Defendants.<br />

WHEREFORE, defendant BURNHAM LLC, hereby requests summar:{<br />

X<br />

I<br />

I<br />

I<br />

judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice La\$<br />

and Rules Section 53212, dismissing plaintiffs’ Complaint agains-:<br />

defendant BURNHAM LLC, with prejudice, and there being no<br />

opposition thereto,<br />

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and<br />

cross claims against defendant BURNHAM LLC, be dismissed with<br />

prejudice and without costs.<br />

Dated: Br<br />

Weitz & Luxenberg,<br />

Attorneys for Plaintiff Attorneys for Defendant<br />

Carl Lunderman<br />

Burn ham LLC<br />

700 Broadway, Gth Floor 177 Montague Street<br />

SO ORDERED:<br />

Hon. Sherry K. Heitler


NYCAL<br />

I.A.S. Part 30<br />

Hon. Sherry Klein Heitler, J.S.C.<br />

GLENN WllTlNG AND CONSTANCE WITTING,<br />

Index No.: <strong>11</strong>5962-20<strong>04</strong><br />

-against-<br />

A.W. CHESTERTON et al. including,<br />

GENERAL ELECTRIC COMPANY,<br />

Plaintiffs,<br />

NO OPPOSITION SUMMARY JUDGMENT<br />

MOTION AND ORDER<br />

Defendants.<br />

WHEREFORE, defendant GENERAL ELECTRIC COMPANY hereby request summary judgment in<br />

the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212, dismissing plaintiffs'<br />

complaint against defendant GENERAL ELECTRIC COMPANY with prejudice, and there being no<br />

opposition thereto,<br />

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against defendant<br />

GENERAL ELECTRIC COMPANY be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and without costs.<br />

Dated:<br />

Belluck & Fox, LLP<br />

Attorney for Plaint#%<br />

546 Fifth Avenue, qfh Floor<br />

Sedgwick, Detert, Moran & Arnold, LLP<br />

Attorneys for General Electric Company<br />

Three Gateway Center, 12'h Floor<br />

NEVd YORK<br />

NJI43274Svl<br />

I


SUPMME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK<br />

COUNTY OF NEW YORK<br />

IN RE:<br />

NEW YORK CITY<br />

ASBESTOS LITIGATION<br />

JOHN COUGHLIN<br />

NYCAL<br />

I.A.S. Part 30<br />

(Heitler, S,)<br />

Index No. 9<br />


SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK<br />

COUNTY OF NEW YORK<br />

IN RE NEW YORK CITY ASBESTOS LITIGATION NYCAL<br />

Hon. Sherry Klein Heitler<br />

ADA IRIS OVALLE,<br />

X<br />

X<br />

Index No. <strong>11</strong>2085-2005<br />

-against-<br />

Pia int iff (s),<br />

NO OPPOSITION<br />

SUMMARY JUDGMENT MOTION AND<br />

ORDER<br />

A.O. SMITH WATER PRODUCTS, INC. et al., including<br />

FOSTER WHEELER, LLC,<br />

Defendants.<br />

WHEREFORE, defendant FOSTER WHEELER, LLC hereby requests summary judgment in the<br />

above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212, dismissing plaintiffs'<br />

complaint against defendant FOSTER WHEELER, LLC with prejudice, and there being no opposition<br />

thereto,<br />

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against defendant<br />

FOSTER WHEELER, LLC be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and without costs.<br />

Sedgwick, Detert, Moran & Arnold, LLP<br />

Attorneys for Foster Wheeler, IIC<br />

546 Fifth Avenue, qfh Floor<br />

Three Gateway Center, 12'h Flo r<br />

New York, NY 10036 A w a r k .<br />

2!5ziic<br />

NJ07102<br />

SO ORDERED,<br />

0 1 E D


SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK<br />

COUNn OF NEW YORK<br />

IN RE NEW YORK CITY ASBESTOS LITIGATION NYCAL<br />

I.A.S. Part 30<br />

RAFFAELE LACALAMITA and COLOMBA LACALAMITA,<br />

X<br />

X<br />

Index No. <strong>11</strong>4107-2005<br />

-against-<br />

Plaint iff,<br />

A.O. SMITH WATER PRODUCTS, et al., including<br />

GENERAL ELECTRIC COMPANY,<br />

NO OPPOSITION<br />

SUMMARY JUDGMENT MOTION AND<br />

ORDER<br />

Defendants.<br />

WHEREFORE, defendant General Electric Company hereby request summary judgment in the<br />

above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212, dismissing plaintiffs'<br />

complaint against defendant General Electric Company with prejudice, and there being no opposition<br />

thereto,<br />

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against defendant<br />

General Electric Company be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and without costs.<br />

Dated:<br />

New York, New York<br />

Stephen Novakid;,<br />

-<br />

Esq.<br />

Sedgwick, Detert, Moran 81 Arnold, LLP<br />

Attorneys for General Electric Co<br />

Three Gateway Center, 12fh Floor


SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK<br />

COUNTY OF NEW YORK<br />

IN RE NEW YORK CIW ASBESTOS LITIGATION NYCAL<br />

X<br />

GINGER M. WOOD, AS PERSONAL REPRESENTATIVE OF THE<br />

ESTATE OF HENRY L. WOOD,<br />

X<br />

Index No. 101027-2006<br />

-against-<br />

Plaintlffs,<br />

NO OPPOSITION<br />

SUMMARY JUDGMENT MOTION AND<br />

ORDER<br />

A.O. SMITH WATER PRODUCTS, et al., including<br />

GENERAL ELECTRIC COMPANY,<br />

Defendants.<br />

X<br />

WHEREFORE, defendant General Electric Company hereby request summary judgment in the<br />

above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212, dismissing plaintiffs’<br />

complaint against defendant General Electric Company with prejudice, and there being no opposition<br />

thereto,<br />

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against defendant<br />

General Electric Company be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and without costs.<br />

Dated:<br />

New York, New York<br />

-<br />

Attorneys for Plaintiffs<br />

546 Fifth Avenue, qfh Floor<br />

New York, NY 10036 Newark,<br />

Stephen Novakidis, Esq.<br />

Sedgwick, Detert, Moran & Arnold, LF<br />

Attorneys for General Electric Company<br />

Three Gateway Center, 12‘h Floor<br />

I L E D<br />

NJ 07102<br />

APR 2 6 20<strong>11</strong><br />

APR 15 20<strong>11</strong><br />

bJFW YORK<br />

~ U N TCLERK‘S V<br />

OFFICEI’


SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW Y ON<br />

COUNTY OF NEW YORK<br />

JOHN COUGHLIN and BARBARA ANN<br />

COUGHLIN,<br />

NYCAL<br />

: I.A.S. Part 30<br />

(Hon. Sherry Klein Heitler)<br />

Plaintiff(s),<br />

: Index No.: 102347-05<br />

-against-<br />

A.O. SMITH WATER PRODUCTS CO., et al.,<br />

NO-OPPOSITION SUMMARY<br />

JUDGMENT MOTION AND<br />

: ORDER<br />

WHEREFORE, defendant CRANE CO, hereby requests summary judgment in the<br />

above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212, dismissing<br />

plaintiffs' complaint against defendant CRANE CO. with prejudice, and there being no<br />

opposition thereto,<br />

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against<br />

defendant CRANE CO. be, and the same are hereby, dismissed with prejudice and without costs,<br />

Dated: 3 \30 \ \\<br />

Frank Ortiz, Esq.<br />

Attorneys for Plaintiff(s)<br />

700 Broadway<br />

New York, NY 10003<br />

(2 12) 558-5500 New York, NY 10022<br />

(212) 536-3900 APR 2 6 *01'<br />

SO ORDERED,<br />

prcw YORK<br />

C,OUN ry CLERKS oFF'CE


SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK<br />

COUNTY OF NEW YORK<br />

IN E: NEW YORK COUNTY<br />

! NYCAL<br />

ASBESTOS LITIGATION<br />

j 1.A.S. Part 30<br />

j (Heitler, J.)<br />

1<br />

THIS DOCUMENT REFERS TO:<br />

j IndexNo.. ~ 7 0 8 1 ’ 0,<br />

1<br />

DONNA M. MEDER, PERSONAL<br />

REPRESENTATIVE FOR THE ESTATE OF<br />

DONALD E. SIERING,<br />

i NO OPPOSITION<br />

Plaintiffs, i SUMMARY JUDGMENT<br />

i MOTION AND ORDER .<br />

-against-<br />

A. C. & S., NC., et al.,<br />

Defendants.<br />

i<br />

WHEREFOE, defendant, Treadwell Corporation, hereby requests summary judgment in<br />

the above entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules 5 3212, dismissing plaintiffs’<br />

complaint against defendant, Treadwell Corporation, with prejudice in this action, and there<br />

being no opposition thereto,<br />

ORDEED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against<br />

defendant, Treadwell Corporation, be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and<br />

without costs.<br />

Dated: New York, New York<br />

Attorney for Defendant<br />

Treadwe<strong>11</strong> Corporation<br />

MCGIVNEY & KLUGER, P.C.<br />

80 Broad Street-Suite 2300<br />

New York, New York 100<strong>04</strong><br />

(212) 509-3456<br />

SO ORDERED,<br />

700 Broadway<br />

New York, New York 10003<br />

123GQW<br />

APR 2 6 20<strong>11</strong><br />

f4EN YORK<br />

1-y CLERK‘S OFFICE


SUI'KEME COIJR'f OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK<br />

COUNTY OF NEW YORK --<br />

IN RE: NEW YORK COUNTY j NYCAJ,<br />

ASBESTOS LITIGATION<br />

j 1.A.S. Part 3<br />

--_A<br />

I (Heitler, J.)<br />

?'HIS DOCUMENT REFERS TO:<br />

; Index No.: <strong>11</strong><br />

ANN LATTANZIO, INDIVIDUALLY AND AS<br />

PERSONAL REPRESENTATIVE FOR THE<br />

ESTATE OF GIOVAWI LATTANZIO,<br />

i NO OPPOSITION<br />

Plaintiffs, \ SUMMARY JUDGMENT<br />

! MOTION AND ORDER<br />

-against-<br />

__-___--..--.-<br />

---<br />

A. C. & S., WC., et al.,<br />

($%%32<strong>26</strong>9'0<br />

Defendants.<br />

J<br />

WHEREFORE, defendaqt, Oakfabco, Inc., hereby requests summary judgment in the<br />

above entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules 3 3212, dismissing plaintiffs'<br />

complaint against defendant, Oakfabco, Inc., wfth prejudice in this action, and there being no<br />

opposition thereto,<br />

ORDER.ED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against<br />

defendant, Oakfabco, Inc., be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and without<br />

costs.<br />

Dated: New York, New York<br />

201 1<br />

Robert Darish, Esq.<br />

Attorney for Defendant<br />

Oakfabco, Inc.<br />

Estate of Giovanni Lattanz<br />

MCGIVNEY & KLUGER, P.C.<br />

WEITZ & LUXENBERG, P.C.<br />

80 Broad Street-Suite 2300<br />

700 Broadway<br />

New York, New York 100 New York, New York 10003 APR 2<br />

6 20<strong>11</strong><br />

(2 12) 509-3456<br />

SO ORDERED,


SUPREME COURT OF ‘I’I-jE STATE OF NEW YOKK<br />

.- COUNTY<br />

-. OF NEW YORK -<br />

IN RE: NEW YON couN‘rY<br />

NYCAL<br />

ASBESTOS LITIGATION<br />

J.A.S. Part 30<br />

(Heitler, 3.)<br />

1’HIS DOCUMENT REFERS TO:<br />

ANN LATTANZIO, INDIVIDUALLY AND AS<br />

PERSONAL REPRESENTATIVE FOR THE<br />

ESTATE OF GIOVANNI LATTANZIO,<br />

-against-<br />

Plaintiffs,<br />

NO OPPOSITION<br />

SUMMARY JUDGMENT<br />

MOTION AND ORDER<br />

A. C. & S., INC., et al.,<br />

Defendants.<br />

I<br />

WHEREFORE, defendant, Treadwell Corporation, hereby requests summary judgment in<br />

the above entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules 5 3212, dismissing plaintiffs’<br />

complaint against defendant, Treadwell Corporation, with prejudice in this action, and there<br />

being no opposition thereto,<br />

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against<br />

defendant, Treadwell Corporation, be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and<br />

without costs.<br />

Dated: New York, New York<br />

4/l ,20<strong>11</strong><br />

MaA<br />

Carol M. Ternpesta,hEsq.<br />

Attorney for Defendant<br />

Treadwell Corporation<br />

MCGIVNEY & KLUGER, P.C.<br />

80 Broad Street-Suite 2300<br />

New York, New York 100<strong>04</strong><br />

(212) 509-3456 Ai-‘,< ;r 6<br />

SO ORDERED, p,\rt I ‘ 7; :;I ‘a\<br />

c~~%LERK’s OFFICE<br />

N0<strong>04</strong><strong>04</strong>78-1<br />

APR 15 20<strong>11</strong>


SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK<br />

COUNTY OF NEW YORK<br />

IN RE NEW YORK CITY ASBESTOS LITIGATION NYCAL<br />

Hon. Sherry Klein Heitler<br />

X<br />

X<br />

PHYLLIS N. SEGAL, Individually and as Executrix of the Estate of Index No. <strong>11</strong>3056-2006<br />

ELI J. SEGAL,<br />

-against -<br />

Plaint iff s,<br />

A.O. SMITH WATER PRODUCTS, et al., including<br />

FOSTER WHEELER, LLC,<br />

NO OPPOSITION<br />

SUMMARY JUDGMENT MOTION AND<br />

ORDER<br />

Defendants.<br />

X<br />

WHEREFORE, defendant Foster Wheeler, LLC hereby request summary judgment in the aboveentitled<br />

case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212, dismissing plaintiffs' complaint<br />

against defendant Foster Wheeler, LLC with prejudice, and there being no opposition thereto,<br />

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against defendant<br />

Foster Wheeler, LLC be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and without costs.<br />

Dated:<br />

New York, New York<br />

f%&1+30.20<strong>11</strong><br />

Bellucf Fox, LLP<br />

Attor ys for Plaintvfs<br />

546 Fifth Avet we, 4th Floor<br />

New York, NY 10036<br />

Sedgwick, Detert, Moran & Arnold, LLP<br />

Attorneysfor Foster Wheeler, LLC<br />

Three Gateway Center, 12'h Floor<br />

Newark, NJ 07102<br />

SO ORDERED,<br />

APR 2 6 20<strong>11</strong>


NYCAL<br />

I.A.S. Part 30<br />

Hon. Sherry Klein Heitler, J.S.C.<br />

DANIEL E. CRANEY and CAROLINE M. CRANEY,<br />

Index No.: <strong>11</strong>4137-2006<br />

-against-<br />

Plaintiffs,<br />

NO OPPOSITION SUMMARY JUDGMENT<br />

MOTION AND ORDER<br />

A.O. SMITH WATER PRODUCTS, et al. INCLUDING GENERAL<br />

ELECTRIC COMPANY,<br />

WHEREFORE, defendant General Electric Company hereby request summary judgment in the<br />

above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212, dismissing plaintiff's<br />

complaint against defendant General Electric Company with prejudice, and there being no opposition<br />

thereto,<br />

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against defendant<br />

General Electric Company be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and without costs.<br />

Dated:<br />

New York, New York<br />

Behck 81 Fox, LLP<br />

Attorneys for Plaintiffs<br />

546 Fifth Avenue, qfh Floor<br />

New York, New York 10036<br />

SO ORDERED,<br />

Sedgwick, Detert, Moran & Arnold, LLP<br />

Attorneys for General Electric Company<br />

Three Gateway Center, 12fh Floor<br />

Newark, NJ 07102<br />

FILED ;<br />

APR 2 6 ZMI<br />

waN YORK<br />

INTY CLERKS OFF IS^


SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK<br />

ALL COUNTIES WITHIN NEW YORK CITY<br />

-__l__-l-----------lf__l_____________l<br />

X NYCAL<br />

IN RE: NEW YORK COUNTY I.A.S. Part 30<br />

ASBESTOS LITIGATION<br />

(Judge Heitler)<br />

____l_--ll----______------------------<br />

X<br />

This Document Relates to: Index No.: <strong>11</strong>4151/05<br />

JOHN R. CATANZARO<br />

NO-OPPOSITION<br />

SUMMARY JUDGMENT<br />

Plaintiff,<br />

MOTION AND ORDER<br />

- against -<br />

A.O.<br />

SMITH WATER PRODUCTS CO., et al.,<br />

Defendants.<br />

X<br />

WHEREFORE, defendant BURNHAM LLC, hereby requests summary<br />

judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law<br />

and Rules Section 53212, dismissing plaintiffs' Complaint against<br />

defendant BURNHAM LLC,<br />

with prejudice, and there being no<br />

opposition thereto,<br />

ORDERED,<br />

that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and<br />

cross claims against defendant BURNHAM LLC, be dismissed with<br />

prejudice and without costs.<br />

Frank Ortiz, Esq.<br />

Weitz & Luxenberg,<br />

Cullen and Dykman LLP<br />

Attorneys for Plaintiff Attorneys for Defendant<br />

John R. Catanzaro<br />

Burnham LLC<br />

700 Broadway, 6th Floor 177 Montague Street<br />

New York, New York 10003 Brooklyn, New York <strong>11</strong>201<br />

212-558-5500 (718) 855-9000<br />

Our File No.: <strong>11</strong>08<br />

SO ORDERED:<br />

APR 2 6 20<strong>11</strong><br />

NFW ',ORK<br />

?OUN"I^U CLERK'S OFF1


-<br />

-<br />

-<br />

V<br />

TMc:CC('jpk)<br />

10<strong>11</strong> 5/09<br />

THIS DOCUMENT RELATES TO:<br />

BERNAXtD FAMMATEO<br />

WON. SHERRY KLEIN HEITLER<br />

NO OPPOSITION SUMMARY<br />

JlJJXMENT MOTION AND<br />

ORDER<br />

WHEREFORE, defendant Consolidated Edison Company of New York, Inc.<br />

hereby requests summary judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law<br />

and Rules Section 3212, dismissing plaintiffs complaint against defendant Consolidated Edison<br />

Company of New York, Inc. with prejudice, and there being no opposition thereto,<br />

ORDERFD, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and moss-claims<br />

against defendant Consolidated Edison Company of New York, Inc., be and the same are hereby<br />

- I I I - - - - - - -<br />

dismissed with prejudice and without costs.<br />

WEITZ & LUXENBERG, P.C.<br />

Attorneys for Plaintiff<br />

700 Broadway<br />

New York, NY 100035<br />

York, Inc.<br />

4 Irving Place<br />

New York, NY 10003-3598<br />

SO ORDERED: ------.--- I<br />

Hon. Sherry Klein Heitler<br />

Our File No APR 2 6 20<strong>11</strong><br />

S-4 147-06<br />

t!F'$V ':"ORK<br />

LURK!$ ~~~~~


-<br />

3 .<br />

c<br />

Th4c:CCCjpk)<br />

1 Of 1 5/09<br />

SUPREME COURT : ALL COUNTIES<br />

w<br />

IN RE NEW YORK CITY ASBESTOS LITIGATION, <strong>11</strong>4377/01 and <strong>11</strong>7394/06<br />

ASSIGNED TO.<br />

____________________----~-~--.-<br />

"-----------""""-----------~.~"-....-~"~~~-<br />

HON. SHERRY nEIN HEITLER<br />

THIS DOCUMENT RELATES TO:<br />

NO OPPOSITION SUMMARY<br />

EDWARD MARTINI<br />

JUDGMENT MOTION AND<br />

ORDER<br />

WEREFORE, defendant Consolidated Edison Company of New York, Inc,<br />

hereby requests summary judgment in the aboveentitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law<br />

and Rules Section 3212, dismissing plaintiffs complaint against defendant Consolidated Edison<br />

Company of New York, hc. with prejudice, and there being no opposition thereto,<br />

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claim and cross-claims<br />

against defendant Consolidated Eclison Company af New York, Inc., be and the same are hereby<br />

- - -- - - - -- ---_I_" I-__ A _ -<br />

dismissed with prejudice and without costs.<br />

Dated: New Y k, New York<br />

7/f/lI<br />

_ _ - - - __ I<br />

Benjhn Darche, Esq.<br />

WEITZ & LUXENBERG, P.C.<br />

Attorneys for Plaintiff<br />

700 Broadway<br />

New Yo& NY 100035<br />

Consolidated Edison Company of New<br />

York, Inc.<br />

4 Irving Place<br />

New Ykk,NY 100 3- 598<br />

r!!! 8 1 Gn<br />

Our File No<br />

S-6783-01


i<br />

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK<br />

ALL COUNTIES WITHIN NEW YORK CITY<br />

________---I___-----_____________<br />

-X<br />

IN RE: NEW YORK COUNTY<br />

ASBESTOS LITIGATION<br />

.....................................<br />

This Document Relates to:<br />

Angeline King, Individually and as<br />

Administratrix for the Estate of John<br />

M. King,<br />

Plaintiff,<br />

- against -<br />

A.O. Smith Water Products Co., et al.,<br />

-X<br />

NYCAL<br />

I.A.S. Part 30<br />

(Judge Heitler)<br />

Index No.: 100678/07<br />

NO OPPOSITION<br />

SUMMARY JUDMNT<br />

MOTION AND ORDER<br />

Defendants.<br />

-X<br />

WHEREFORE, defendant Mario & DiBono Plastering Co. Inc,<br />

hereby requests summary judgment in the above-entitled cas€<br />

pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section §321;<br />

dismissing plaintiffs' Complaint against defendant Mario<br />

DiBono Plastering Co.<br />

Inc., with prejudice, and there being r<br />

opposition thereto,<br />

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all clairr<br />

and cross claims against defendant Mario & DiBono Plastering Cc<br />

Inc., be dismissed with prejudice and without cos F s. D<br />

APR 2 6 20<strong>11</strong><br />

Weitz & Luxenberg, P.C.<br />

Attorneys for Plaintiff<br />

Angeline King, Individually and<br />

as Administratrix for the<br />

Estate of John M. King<br />

700 Broadway, 6th Floor<br />

New York, New York 10003<br />

F<br />

C len and Dykman LLP<br />

A torneys for Defendant<br />

Mario .& DiBono Plastering Co.<br />

Inc.<br />

177 Montague Street<br />

Brooklyn, New York <strong>11</strong>201<br />

(718) 855-9000<br />

?<br />

i


SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK<br />

ALL COUNTIES WITHIN NEW YORK CITY<br />

X NYCAL<br />

IN RE: NEW YORK COUNTY I.A.S. Part 30<br />

ASBESTOS LITIGATION<br />

(Judge Heitler)<br />

___________________-________________I_<br />

X<br />

This Document Relates to: Index No.: 100678/07<br />

JOHN M. KING<br />

NO-OPPOSITION<br />

SUMMARY JUDGMENT<br />

Plaintiff,<br />

MOTION AND ORDER<br />

- against -<br />

A.O. SMITH WATER PRODUCTS CO., et al.,<br />

WHEREFORE,<br />

defendant BURNHAM LLC, hereby requests summar<br />

judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice La<br />

and Rules Section 53212, dismissing plaintiffs' Complaint agains<br />

defendant BURNHAM LLC, with prejudice, and there being n<br />

opposition thereto,<br />

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims an<br />

cross claims against defendant BURNHAM LLC, be dismissed wit<br />

prejudice and without costs.<br />

Weitz & Luxenberg,<br />

Attorneys for Plaintiff Attorneys for Defendant<br />

John M. King Burnham LLC<br />

700 Broadway, 6th Floor 177 Montague Street<br />

New York, New York 10003 Brooklyn, New York <strong>11</strong><br />

212-558-5500 (718) 855-9000<br />

Our File No. :<br />

SO ORDERED:<br />

--<br />

Hen. Sherry K. Heitler


NYCAL<br />

I.A.S. Part 30<br />

Hon. Sherry Klein Heitler, J.S.C.<br />

ELIZABETH H. BARNES, INDIVIDUALLY AND AS EXECUTRIX OF<br />

THE ESTATE OF LE ROY A. BARNES, JR.,<br />

Index No.: 103121-2007<br />

-against-<br />

Plaintiffs,<br />

NO OPPOSITION SUMMARY JUDGMENT<br />

MOTION AND ORDER<br />

A.O. SMITH WATER PRODUCTS et at. including,<br />

GENERAL ELECTRIC COMPANY,<br />

Defendants.<br />

WHEREFORE, defendant GENERAL ELECTRIC COMPANY hereby request summary judgment in<br />

the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212, dismissing plaintiffs'<br />

complaint against defendant GENERAL ELECTRIC COMPANY with prejudice, and there being no<br />

opposition thereto,<br />

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against defendant<br />

GENERAL ELECTRIC COMPANY be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and without costs.<br />

Attorney for Plain tvfs<br />

546 Fifth Avenue, qfh Floor<br />

New York, New York 10036<br />

Stephen Novakidis, Esq.<br />

Sedgwick, Detert, Moran & Arnold, LLP<br />

Attorneys for General Electric<br />

Three Gateway Center, 12fh Flo<br />

Newark, NJ 07102<br />

SO ORDERED,


SUPREME COIJK'L' OF THE STATE OF NEW Y ORK<br />

-_- COUNTY OF NEW YORK<br />

IN RE: NEW YOKK com'ry<br />

j NYCAL<br />

ASBESTOS LITIGATJ ON<br />

i I.A.S. Part 30<br />

j (IIeitler, J.)<br />

THIS DOCUMENT REFERS TO:<br />

i Index No.: <strong>11</strong>9388/00,<br />

. ANNA __ E. BLENKENSOPP, INDIVIDUALLY !<br />

AND PERSONAL mPRESENTATIVE FOR<br />

j<br />

THE ESTATE OF DAVID BLENKENSOPP,<br />

-against-<br />

[ NO OPPOSITION<br />

i SUMMARY JUDGMENT<br />

Plaintiffs, \ MOTION AND ORDER<br />

A. C. & S., TNC., et al.,<br />

-<br />

Defendants. 1<br />

WHEREFORE, defendant, Courter & Company, Inc., hereby requests summary<br />

judgment in the above entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules 5 3212, dismissing<br />

plaintiffs' complaint against defendant, Courter & Company, Inc., with prejudice in this action,<br />

and there being no opposition thereto,<br />

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against<br />

defendant, Courter & Company, Inc., be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and<br />

without costs.<br />

Attorney for Defendant<br />

Courter & Company, Inc.<br />

MCGIWY & KLUGER, P.C.<br />

80 Broad Street-Suite 2300<br />

New York, New York 100<strong>04</strong><br />

(212) 509-3456<br />

SO ORDERED,<br />

Estate of David Blenkensopp ikensopp<br />

WEITZ & LUXENBERG,<br />

YENBERG, P.C.<br />

700 Broadway<br />

New York, New lew York 10003<br />

I<br />

APR 2 6 20<strong>11</strong><br />

N0<strong>04</strong><strong>04</strong>78-1


~ COUN‘I’Y<br />

SUPREME COURl’ OF ‘1XE STATE OF NEW YORK<br />

I __-- OF NEW YORK - -<br />

IN RE: NEW YORK COUNTY j NYCAL<br />

ASBESTOS LITIGATION<br />

j I.A.S. Part 3U<br />

0<br />

j (HeitIer,.I.)<br />

‘ms<br />

-_i<br />

DOCUMENT REFERS TO:<br />

j Index No.: <strong>11</strong>9388/0 , 1<strong>04</strong>633/07<br />

ANNA E. BLENKENSOPP, INDIVIDUALLY<br />

AND PERSONAL REPFSSENTATIVE FOR<br />

THE ESTATE OF DAVID BLENKENSOPP, i NO OPPOSITION<br />

i SUMMARY JUDGMENT<br />

Plaintiffs, ; MOTION AND ORDER<br />

-against-<br />

A. C. & S., INC., et ul.,<br />

Defendants. ;<br />

WHEREFORE, defendant, Safeguard Industrial Equipment Co., hereby requests<br />

summary judgment in the above entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules § 3212,<br />

dismissing plaintiffs’ complaint against defendant, Safeguard Industrial Equipment Co., with<br />

prejudice in this action, and there being no opposition thereto,<br />

OTCDEmD, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against<br />

defendant, Safeguard Industrial Equipment Co., be and the same are hereby dismissed with<br />

prejudice and without costs.<br />

Attorney for Plaintiffs<br />

Estate of David Blenkensopp F 1 L ‘’E D<br />

Safeguard Industrial Equipment Co.<br />

MCGIVNEY & KLUGER, P.C.<br />

WEITZ & LUXENBERG, P.C.<br />

80 Broad Street-Suite 2300<br />

700 Broadway<br />

New York, New York 100<strong>04</strong> New York 10003 /%pR 2 6 20<strong>11</strong><br />

(212) 509-3456<br />

NEW YORK<br />

SO ORDERED,<br />

wn<br />

324-5661A<br />

URKS OFF\@<br />

N0<strong>04</strong><strong>04</strong>78-1


I Defendants.<br />

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YOW<br />

COUNTY OF NEW YORK -<br />

IN RE: NEW YORK COUNTY<br />

I NYCAL<br />

0<br />

ASBESTOS LlTIGATION<br />

: 1.A.S. Part 3<br />

i (Heitler, J.)<br />

THIS DOCUMENT REFERS TO:<br />

j Index No.: <strong>11</strong>9388/0 , 1<strong>04</strong>633/07<br />

ANNA E. BLENRENSOPP, INDIVIDUALLY<br />

i<br />

AND PERSONAL REPRESENTATIVE FOR<br />

j<br />

THE ESTATE OF DAVlD BLENKENSOPP, : NO OPPOSITION<br />

SUMMARY JUDGMENT<br />

Plaintiffs, j MOTION AND ORDER<br />

- --<br />

-against-<br />

A. C. & S., INC., etal.,<br />

i<br />

. WHEREFORE,' defendant, Patterson Pump Co., hereby requests summary judgment in<br />

the above entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules 5 3212, dismissing plaintiffs'<br />

complaint against defendant, Patterson Pump Co., with prejudice in this action, and there being<br />

<strong>11</strong>0 opposition thereto,<br />

' ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against<br />

defendant, Patterson Pump Co., be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and without<br />

costs.<br />

1 Dated: New York, New York<br />

0<strong>11</strong><br />

A<br />

80 Broad Street-Suite 2300<br />

700 Broadway<br />

New York, New York 100<strong>04</strong> York10003 kp[i 2 6 20<strong>11</strong><br />

(2 12) 509-3456<br />

SO ORDERED,<br />

!'ti ..2' ':" C) (4 jS*<br />

MJUh TY CLLRKI'S OFFICE'<br />

454-9039<br />

N0<strong>04</strong><strong>04</strong>7X-1


SUPREME COURT OF THE sm-rE OF NEW YORK<br />

COUNTY OF NEW YORK<br />

- - ~ -<br />

IN RE: NEW YORK COUNTY<br />

j NYCAL<br />

ASBESTOS LITIGATION<br />

j I.A.S. Part 30<br />

- j (IIeitler, J.)<br />

’THIS DOCUMENT REFERS TO:<br />

0<br />

i Index No.: <strong>11</strong>9388/0 1<strong>04</strong>633/07<br />

ANNA E. BLENKENSOPP, INDIVIDUALLY<br />

AND PERSONAL REPRESENTATIVE FOR<br />

THE ESTATE OF DAVID BLENKENSOPP, i NO OPPOSITION<br />

j SUMMARY JUDGMENT<br />

Plaintiffs, i MOTION AND ORDER<br />

-against-<br />

A. C. & S., INC., et al.,<br />

.-<br />

Defendants.<br />

j<br />

WHEREFORE, defendant, Tishman Liquidating Corp., hereby requests summary<br />

judgment in the above entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules 5 3212, dismissing<br />

plaintiffs’ complaint against defendant, Tishman Liquidating Corp., with prejudice in this action,<br />

and there being no opposition thereto,<br />

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against<br />

defendant, Tishman Liquidating Corp., be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and<br />

without costs.<br />

Estate of David BIenkenso<br />

WEITZ & LUXENBERG, P.C<br />

80 Broad Street-Suite 2300<br />

700 Broadway<br />

New York, New York 100<strong>04</strong> York10003 ApR 2 6 20<strong>11</strong><br />

(212) 509-3456<br />

SO ORDERED,<br />

NEb ! ,‘t:q$L<br />

COkrNTY CLERK‘S QFFlCE’<br />

Hon. Sherry Klein Heitler 2383-22469 27650<br />

N0<strong>04</strong><strong>04</strong>78-1<br />

1 5 20 fl


SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK<br />

COUNTY OF NEW YORK<br />

IN RE: NEW YORK CITY ASBESTOS LITIGATION<br />

................................................................. X<br />

This Document Relates To:<br />

ANNA E. BLENKENSOPP, as Personal<br />

Representative for the Estate of DAVID<br />

BLENKENSOPP and ANNA E. BLENKENSOPP,<br />

Individually,<br />

: NYCAL<br />

* I.A.S. Part 30<br />

: (Hen. Sheny Klein Heitler)<br />

Plaintiff( s),<br />

: Index No.: 1<strong>04</strong>633-07<br />

-against-<br />

A.O. SMITH WATER PRODUCTS CO., et al.,<br />

NO-OPPOSITION SUMMARY<br />

: JUDGMENT MOTION AND<br />

: ORDER<br />

WHEREFORE, defendant CRANE CO. hereby requests summary judgment in the<br />

above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212, dismissing<br />

plaintiff's complaint against defendant CRANE CO, with prejudice, and there being no<br />

opposition thereto,<br />

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against<br />

defendant CRANE CO. be, and the same are hereby, dismissed with prejudice and without costs.<br />

Dated: 3 \ 3 o\ [\<br />

Attorneys for Plaintiff(s)<br />

700 Broadway CRANE CO, c o u ~ ~<br />

New York, NY 10003<br />

(212) 558-5500<br />

599 Lexington Avenue<br />

New York, NY 10022<br />

(212) 536-3900<br />

CLERKS OFFICE<br />

SO ORDERED,<br />

Hon. Sherry Klein Heitler<br />

APR 1520<strong>11</strong>


SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK<br />

COUNTY OF NEW YORK<br />

IN RE<br />

NEW YORK CITY ASBESTOS LITIGATION<br />

X<br />

X<br />

NYCAL<br />

I.A.S. Part 30<br />

JOEL GARLAND, Index No. <strong>11</strong>1905-2007<br />

-against-<br />

Plaintiff,<br />

A.O. SMITH WATER PRODUCTS, et al., including<br />

GENERAL ELECTRIC COMPANY,<br />

NO OPPOSITION<br />

SUMMARY JUDGMENT MOTION AND<br />

ORDER<br />

Defendants.<br />

X<br />

WHEREFORE, defendant General Electric Company hereby request summary judgment in the<br />

above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212, dismissing plaintiffs’<br />

complaint against defendant General Electric Company with prejudice, and there being no opposition<br />

thereto,<br />

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against defendant<br />

General Electric Company be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and without costs.<br />

Dated:<br />

New York, New York<br />

MAfk1( 30,20 I<br />

546 Fifth Avenue, qfh Floor<br />

New York, New York 10036<br />

Stephen Novakidis, Esq.<br />

Sedgwick, Detert, Moran & Arnold, LLP<br />

Attorneys for General Electric Compan<br />

Three Gateway Center, 1Topr<br />

Newark, NJ 07102 *, d”<br />

SO ORDERED,


WHEREFORE, defendant Consolidated ESdison Company of New York, Inc.<br />

hereby requests summary judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law<br />

and Rules Section 3212, dismissing plaintifPs complaint against defendant Consolidated Fdison<br />

Company of New York, Inc. with prejudice, and there being no opposition thereto,<br />

ORDEFLED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, dl claims and cross-claims<br />

against defendant Consolidated Edisan Company of New York, Inc., be and the same are hereby<br />

Attorneys for Plaintiff<br />

180 Maiden Lane<br />

New York, NY 100384925<br />

Consolidated Edison Company of New<br />

York, Inc.


SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK<br />

ALL COUNTIES WITHIN NEW YORK CITY<br />

..................................... -X<br />

IN RE: NEW YORK COUNTY<br />

ASBESTOS LITIGATION<br />

This Document Relates to:<br />

Ann Shaw, as Executrix for the Estate<br />

of Nathan Glowatz,<br />

- against -<br />

Plaintiff,<br />

A.O. Smith Water Products Co., et al.,<br />

NYCAL<br />

I.A.S. Part 30<br />

(Judge Heitler)<br />

Index No.: <strong>11</strong>6794/07<br />

NO OPPOSITION<br />

SUMMARY JUDGMENT<br />

MOTION AND ORDER<br />

Defendants.<br />

..................................... -X<br />

WHEREFORE, defendant Mario & DiBono Plastering Co. Inc.,<br />

hereby requests summary judgment in the above-entitled case,<br />

pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section §3212,<br />

dismissing plaintiffs' Complaint against defendant Mario 6<br />

DiBono Plastering Co. Inc., with prejudice, and there being nc<br />

opposition thereto,<br />

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claimE<br />

and cross claims against defendant Mario & DiBono Plastering Co.<br />

Inc. , be dismissed with prejudice and without cos<br />

Dated:<br />

Brooklyn, New York<br />

YlrL / 20<strong>11</strong><br />

E,<br />

Michael Fanelli, Esq.<br />

Weitz & Luxenberg, P.C.<br />

Attorneys for Plaintiff<br />

Ann Shaw, as Executrix for the<br />

Estate of Nathan Glowatz<br />

700 Broadway, 6th Floor 177 Montague Street<br />

New York, New York 10003 Brooklyn, New York <strong>11</strong>201<br />

(718) 855-9000<br />

i-<br />

r File No.: 10924-5662<br />

So Ordered: Hon. Sherry K. Heitler AI% d 5 %Ill1<br />

Mario & DiBono Plastering Co.<br />

Inc.<br />

E


SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK<br />

ALL COUNTIES WITHIN NEW YORK CITY<br />

___________-___---_-_______I__________<br />

X<br />

IN RE: NEW YORK COUNTY<br />

ASBESTOS LITIGATION<br />

___l____l_____l____________________I__<br />

X<br />

This Document Relates to:<br />

NATHAN GLOWATZ<br />

- against -<br />

Plaintiff,<br />

NYCAL '<br />

I.A.S. P art 30<br />

(Judge Heitler)<br />

Index No.: <strong>11</strong>6794/07<br />

NO-OPPOSITION<br />

SUMMARY JUDGMENT<br />

MOTION AND ORDER<br />

A.O. SMITH WATER PRODUCTS CO.,<br />

et al.,<br />

WHEREFORE, defendant BURNHAM LLC, hereby requests sumrnai<br />

judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice LE<br />

and Rules Section 53212, dismissing plaintiffs' Complaint again:<br />

defendant BURNHAM LLC, with prejudice, and there being r<br />

opposition thereto,<br />

ORDERED,<br />

that upon notice to a<strong>11</strong> co-defendants, all claims ar<br />

cross claims against defendant BURNHAM LLC,<br />

prejudice and without costs.<br />

ApR 2 6 'O'<br />

e)<br />

Cullen and Dykman LLP<br />

Attorneys for Plaintiff Attorneys for Defendant<br />

Nathan Glowatz<br />

Burn ham L LC<br />

700 Broadway, 6th Floor 177 Montague Street<br />

New York, New York 10003 Brooklyn, New York <strong>11</strong>201<br />

212-558-5500 (718) 855-9000<br />

Our File No.: <strong>11</strong>084-1451<br />

SO ORDERED:<br />

-


____-ll------__-----___________I______<br />

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK<br />

ALL COUNTIES WITHIN NEW YORK CITY<br />

___l-lfll----__-----------------------<br />

X<br />

IN RE: NEW YORK COUNTY<br />

ASBESTOS LITIGATION<br />

X<br />

This Document Relates to:<br />

FELIX M. JUZDOWSKI<br />

Plaintiff,<br />

NYCAL<br />

1.A.S. Part 30<br />

(Judge Heitler)<br />

Index No.: <strong>11</strong>6796/07<br />

NO-OPPOSITION<br />

SUMMARY JUDGMENT<br />

MOTION AND ORDER<br />

- against -<br />

A.O. SMITH WATER PRODUCTS CO., et al.,<br />

WHEREFORE,<br />

defendant BURNHAM LLC,<br />

hereby requests summar<br />

judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice La<br />

and Rules Section 53212, dismissing plaintiffs’ Complaint agains<br />

defendant BURNHAM LLC, with<br />

prejudice, and there being n<br />

opposition thereto,<br />

ORDERED,<br />

that upon notice to all co-defendants, a ll claims an<br />

cross claims against defendant BURNHAM LLC, be dismissed wit<br />

prejudice and without costs.<br />

Cullen and Dykman LLP<br />

Attorneys for Plaintiff Attorneys for Defendant<br />

Felix M. Juzdowski<br />

Bum ham LLC<br />

700 Broadway, 6t’’ Floor 177 Montague Street<br />

New York, New York 10003 Brooklyn, New York<br />

212-558-5500 (718) 855-9000<br />

Our File No.:


I___-A -<br />

NYCAL<br />

I.A.S. Part 30<br />

Hon. Sherry Klein Heitler, J.S.C.<br />

JAMES RUDGE and SONIA RUDGE,<br />

Index No.: 102239-2008<br />

Plaintiffs,<br />

-against-<br />

NO OPPOSITION SUMMARY JUDGMENT<br />

MOTION AND ORDER<br />

I<br />

A.O. SMITH WATER PRODUCTS, et al. including<br />

GENERAL ELECTRIC COMPANY,<br />

Defendants.<br />

WHEREFORE, defendant GENERAL ELECTRIC COMPANY hereby request summary judgment in the<br />

above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212, dismissing plaintiffs'<br />

complaint against defendant GENERAL ELECTRIC COMPANY with prejudice, and there being no<br />

opposition thereto,<br />

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against defendant<br />

GENERAL ELECTRIC COMPANY be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and without costs.<br />

Dated:<br />

New York, New York<br />

flAK.Cd 30.20\ I<br />

Attorneys for Plaintiffs<br />

546 Fifth Avenue, 4'h Floor<br />

New York, New York 10036<br />

SO ORDERED,<br />

r)<br />

-<br />

Stephen Novakidis, Esq.<br />

Sedgwick, Detert, Moran & Arnold, LLP<br />

Attorneys for General Electric Company<br />

Three Gateway Center, 12th Floor<br />

Newark, NJ 07102<br />

-<br />

p R 2 6 20<strong>11</strong><br />

FILED<br />

NJD03247vl


SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK<br />

COUNTY OF NEW YORK<br />

~____<br />

.~<br />

IN RE NEW YORK CITY ASBESTOS LITIGATION NYCAL<br />

VICTOR REYNIAK AND SYBILLE REYNIAK, Index No. 10<strong>26</strong>88/2008<br />

X<br />

-against-<br />

Plaintiffs,<br />

BARNSTEAD INTERNATIONAL, et al., including<br />

GENERAL ELECTRIC COMPANY,<br />

NO OPPOSITION<br />

SUMMARY JUDGMENT MOTION AND<br />

ORDER<br />

Defendants.<br />

X<br />

WHEREFORE, defendant General Electric Company hereby request summary judgment in the<br />

above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212, dismissing plaintiffs'<br />

complaint against defendant General Electric Company with prejudice, and there being no opposition<br />

thereto,<br />

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against defendant<br />

General Electric Company be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and without co s.<br />

FILED '5<br />

Dated:<br />

New York, New York<br />

MAW! 30.201 I<br />

546 Fifth Avenue, qfh Floor<br />

New York, NY 10036<br />

Sedgwick, Detert, Moran & Arnold, LLP<br />

Attorneys for General Electric Company<br />

Three Gateway Center, 12'h Floor<br />

Newark, NJ 07102<br />

SO ORDERED,<br />

A M 1520<strong>11</strong>


SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK<br />

COUNTY OF NEW YORK<br />

IN RE: NEW YORK COUNTY i NYCAL<br />

ASBESTOS LITIGATION<br />

j I.A.S. Part 30<br />

i (Heitler, J.)<br />

THIS DOCUMENT REFERS TO:<br />

Index No.: 190020/08<br />

RICHARD R. PAUL,<br />

-against-<br />

A. C. & S., INC., et al.,<br />

Plaintiffs,<br />

NO OPPOSITION<br />

SUMMARY JUDGMENT<br />

MOTION AND ORDER<br />

Defendants. /<br />

WHEREFORE, defendant, Flowserve Corporation f/k/a The Duriron Company, Inc.,<br />

I<br />

hereby requests summary judgment in the above entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law<br />

and Rules 6 3212, dismissing plaintiffs' complaint against defendant, Flowserve Corporation<br />

fMa The Duriron Company, Inc., with prejudice in this action, and there being no opposition<br />

thereto,<br />

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against<br />

defendant, Flowserve Corporation fMa The Duriron Company, Inc., be and the same are hereby<br />

dismissed with prejudice and without costs.<br />

Matthew T. Fairley, Esq.<br />

Attorney for Defendant<br />

Attorney for Plaintiffs<br />

Flowserve Corporation<br />

Richard R. Paul<br />

MCGWNEY & KLUGER, P.C.<br />

Weitz & Luxenberg, P.C.<br />

80 Broad Street-Suite 2300<br />

700 Broadway<br />

New York, New York 100<strong>04</strong><br />

New York, New York 1OOO$=<br />

(212) 509-3456 (212) 558-5500<br />

I L E D<br />

SO ORDERED, APR 2 6 20<strong>11</strong><br />

Hon. Sherry Klein Heitler<br />

951-0823 NEW YORK<br />

COUNTY CLERKS OFFICE<br />

NO03895 1


.-<br />

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YON<br />

COUNTY OF NEW YORK<br />

IN RE: NEW YORK COUNTY<br />

! NYCAL<br />

ASBESTOS LITIGATION<br />

i I.A.S. Part 30<br />

[ (Heitler, J.)<br />

THIS DOCUMENT REFERS TO:<br />

i Index No.: 190020/08<br />

RICHARD R. PAUL,<br />

-against-<br />

A. C. & S., INC., et al.,<br />

Plaintiffs, \ NO OPPOSITION<br />

! SUMMARY JUDGMENT<br />

i MOTION AND ORDER<br />

Defendants.<br />

WHEREFORE, defendant, Aurora Pump Company, hereby requests summary judgment<br />

in the above entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules 9 3212, dismissing<br />

plaintiffs’ complaint against defendant, Aurora Pump Company, with prejudice in this action,<br />

and there being no opposition thereto,<br />

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against<br />

defendant, Aurora Pump Company, be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and<br />

without costs.<br />

Aurora Pump Company<br />

MCG~VNEY & KLUGER, P.C.<br />

80 Broad Street-Suite 2300<br />

New York, New York 100<strong>04</strong><br />

Richard R. Paul<br />

Weitz & Luxenberg,<br />

700Broadway 1 E<br />

New York, New York 10003<br />

1003-0<strong>26</strong>1<br />

N0038955-1


SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK<br />

COUNTY OF NEW YORK<br />

NYCAL<br />

I.A.S. Part 30<br />

Hon. Sherry Klein Heitler, J.S.C.<br />

JOHN 1. VAUGHAN and MARY VAUGHAN, Index No,: 190051-2009<br />

-against-<br />

Plaintiffs,<br />

NO OPPOSITION SUMMARY JUDGMENT<br />

MOTION AND ORDER<br />

A.O. SMITH WATER PRODUCEi CO. et al., including<br />

FOSTER WHEELER, L.L.C.,<br />

Defendants.<br />

WHEREFORE, defendant FOSTER WHEELER, L.L.C. hereby request summary judgment in the<br />

above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212, dismissing plaintiff's<br />

complaint against defendant FOSTER WHEELER, L.L.C. with prejudice, and there being no opposition<br />

thereto,<br />

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against defendant<br />

FOSTER WHEELER, L.L.C. be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and without costs.<br />

Weitz & Luxenberg, P.C.<br />

Attorneys for Plointffs<br />

700 Broadway<br />

New York, New York 10003 fl<br />

SO ORDERED,<br />

Hon. Sherry Klein. Heitler, J.S.C.<br />

Attorneys for Foster Wheeler, L. L. C.<br />

Three Gateway Center, 12fh Floor<br />

Newark, NJ 07102<br />

FILE<br />

APR 2 6 20<strong>11</strong><br />

NEW YORK<br />

CQUNTY CLERK'S OFFICE'


NYC<br />

I.A.S. Part 30<br />

Hon. Sherry Klein Heitler, J.S.C.<br />

WILLIAM D. SAKSEN JR. and ANNA SAKSEN,<br />

Index No.: 190061-2009<br />

-against-<br />

Plaintiffs,<br />

NO OPPOSITION SUMMARY JUDGMENT<br />

MOTION AND ORDER<br />

A.O. SMITH WATER PRODUCTS COMPANY et al. including,<br />

FOSTER WHEELER, L.L.C.,<br />

Defendants,<br />

WHEREFORE, defendant Foster Wheeler, L.L.C. hereby request summary judgment in the aboveentitled<br />

case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212, dismissing plaintiff's complaint<br />

against defendant Foster Wheeler, L.L.C. with prejudice, and there being no opposition thereto,<br />

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against defendant<br />

Foster Wheeler, L.L.C. be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and without costs.<br />

Dated:<br />

New York. New York<br />

Frank Ortiz, Esq.<br />

Weitz 81 Luxenberg, P.C.<br />

Attorney for Plaintvfs<br />

700 Broadway<br />

New York, New York 10003<br />

(212) 558-5500<br />

n I<br />

Dennis E. Vega, Esq.<br />

Sedgwick,<br />

Attorneys for Foster Wheeler, L. L.C.<br />

Three Gateway Center, 12' ~ QLED 1<br />

Newark, NJ 07102<br />

(973) 242-0002<br />

APR 2 6 20<strong>11</strong><br />

so ORDERED,<br />

NEW YORK<br />

;ml Hon. Sherry Klein Heitler<br />

W-Y CLERK'S OFFICE'<br />

NU256 127v 1


GREGORY AUGUSTINOWICZ and RUTH AUGUSTINOWICZ, Index No.: 19009 1-2 009<br />

-against-<br />

Plaintiffs,<br />

NO OPPOSITION SUMMARY JUDGMENT<br />

MOTION AND ORDER<br />

BUFFALO PUMPS, INC. et ai., including<br />

FOSTER WHEELER, L.L.C.,<br />

Defendants.<br />

WHEREFORE, defendant FOSTER WHEELER, L.L.C. hereby request summary judgment in the<br />

above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212, dismissing plaintiffs<br />

complaint against defendant FOSTER WHEELER, L.L.C. with prejudice, and there being no opposition<br />

thereto,<br />

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against defendant<br />

FOSTER WHEELER, L.L.C. be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and without costs.<br />

Dated:<br />

New York. NeN Vnrk<br />

Frank Ortiz, Esq. Dennis E. Vega, 0<br />

Weitr & Luxenberg, P.C.<br />

Attorneys for Plaintqfs<br />

700 Broadway<br />

New York, New York 10003<br />

Sedgwick, Detert, Moran & Arnold, LLP<br />

Attorneys for Foster Wheeler, LLC<br />

Three Gateway Center, 12‘h<br />

Newark, NJ 07102<br />

SO ORDERED,<br />

Hon. Sherry Klein Heitler, J.S.C.<br />

APR 2 6 20<strong>11</strong><br />

NEW YORK<br />

r;c)uNly CLERK‘S OFFICE!<br />

NJl<strong>26</strong>7896v I


SUPREME COWRT OF THE STATE OF NEW YON<br />

COUNTY OF NEW YO=,<br />

I WCAL


NYCAL<br />

I.A.S. Part 30<br />

Hon. Sherry Klein Heitler, J.S.C.<br />

JOHN SAKATIS AND MYRNA SAKATIS,<br />

-against-<br />

Plaintiffs,<br />

A.O. SMITH WATER PRODUCTS CO., et al., including FOSTER<br />

WHEELER, L.L.C.,<br />

Index No.: 190146-2009<br />

NO OPPOSITION SUMMARY JUDGMENT<br />

MOTION AND ORDER<br />

Defendants.<br />

WHEREFORE, defendant FOSTER WHEELER, L.L.C. hereby request summary judgment in the<br />

above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212, dismissing plaintiff’s<br />

complaint against defendant FOSTER WHEELER, L.L.C. with prejudice, and there being no opposition<br />

thereto,<br />

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against defendant<br />

FOSTER WHEELER, L.L.C. be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and without costs.<br />

SEDGWI<br />

Frank Ortiz, Esq.<br />

Attorneys for P/aint,ffs<br />

700 Broadway<br />

New York, NY 10003<br />

(212) 558-5500 (973) 242-0002<br />

Dennis E.<br />

Attorneys for Foster Wheeler, L. L. C.<br />

Three Gateway Center, 12th Floor<br />

Newark, NJ 07102<br />

SO ORDERED,<br />

Hon. Sherry Klein Heitler<br />

ApR 2 6 20’’<br />

NU<strong>26</strong>795 I v 1


SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK<br />

COUNTY OF NEW YORK<br />

.....................................................................<br />

IN RE: NEW YORK CITY<br />

ASBESTOS LITIGATION<br />

.....................................................................<br />

THOMAS LEAHY AND EVELYN LEAHY,<br />

X<br />

X<br />

NYCAL<br />

I.A.S. Part 30<br />

Hon. Sherry Klein Heitler, J.S.C.<br />

Index No.: 190162-2009<br />

3 M COMPANY et al. including,<br />

GENERAL ELECTRIC COMPANY,<br />

-against-<br />

Plaintiffs,<br />

NO OPPOSITION SUMMARY JUDGMENT<br />

MOTION AND ORDER<br />

Defendants.<br />

WHEREFORE, defendant GENERAL ELECTRIC COMPANY hereby request summary judgment in<br />

the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212, dismissing'plaintiffs'<br />

complaint against defendant GENERAL ELECTRIC COMPANY with prejudice, and there being no<br />

opposition thereto,<br />

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against defendant<br />

GENERAL ELECTRIC COMPANY be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and without costs.<br />

Belluck & Fox, LLP<br />

Attorney for Plaintffs<br />

546 Fifth Avenue, 4th Floor<br />

New York, New York 100<br />

Stephen Nomidis, Esq.<br />

Sedgwick, Detert, Moran & Arnold, LLP<br />

Attorneys for General Electric Company<br />

Three Gateway Center, 12fh Floor<br />

Newark, NJ 07102<br />

FILED<br />

SO ORDERED, APR 2 6 20<strong>11</strong><br />

NEW YORK<br />

COUNTY CLERK'S OFFICE<br />

Al'l? 15 20<strong>11</strong><br />

NJl432735vl


NYCAL<br />

I.A.S. Part 30<br />

Hon. Sherry Klein Heitler, J.S.C.<br />

FRANCISCO SALDIVAR,<br />

Index No.: 190228-2009<br />

-against-<br />

Plaintiffs,<br />

NO OPPOSITION SUMMARY JUDGMENT<br />

MOTION AND ORDER<br />

A.O. SMITH WATER PRODUCTS, INC et al. including, GENERAL<br />

ELECTRIC COMPANY,<br />

Defendants.<br />

WHEREFORE, defendant GENERAL ELECTRIC COMPANY hereby request summary judgment in<br />

the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212, dismissing plaintiffs'<br />

complaint against defendant GENERAL ELECTRIC COMPANY with prejudice, and there being no<br />

opposition thereto,<br />

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against defendant<br />

GENERAL ELECTRIC COMPANY be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and without costs.<br />

Dated:<br />

New York, New York<br />

Stephen Novakidis, Esq.<br />

Sedgwick, Detert, Moran & Arnold, LLP<br />

Attorney for Plaintgfs Attorneys for General Electric Y<br />

546 Fifth Avenue, qfh Floor Three Gateway Center, 12'h Flo L<br />

New York, New York 10934, Newark, NJ 07102<br />

APR 2 6 20<strong>11</strong><br />

D<br />

SO ORDERED,<br />

NEW YORK<br />

COUNTY CLERK'S OFFICE<br />

NJ/377998vl


NYCAL<br />

I.A.S. Part 30<br />

Hon. Sherry Klein Heitler, J.S.C.<br />

KATHRYN THAUT, AS EXECUTRIX OF THE ESTATE OF RODNEY<br />

THAUT, DECEASED,<br />

Index No.: 190333-2009<br />

-against-<br />

Plaintiffs,<br />

NO OPPOSITION SUMMARY JUDGMENT<br />

MOTION AND ORDER<br />

A.O. SMITH WATER PRODUCTS et al. including,<br />

GENERAL ELECTRIC COMPANY,<br />

Defendants.<br />

WHEREFORE, defendant GENERAL ELECTRIC COMPANY hereby request summary judgment in<br />

the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212, dismissing plaintiffs'<br />

complaint against defendant GENERAL ELECTRIC COMPANY with prejudice, and there being no<br />

opposition thereto,<br />

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against defendant<br />

GENERAL ELECTRIC COMPANY be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and without costs.<br />

Dated: ANew York,m York<br />

7<br />

Ked W. Belluck, Esq.<br />

Stephen Novakidis, Esq.<br />

Belljck & Fox, LLP<br />

Sedgwick, Detert, Moran & Arnold, LLP<br />

Attorney for Plain tiffs Attorneys for General El tric Company<br />

546 Fifth Avenue, qfh Floor Three Gateway Center, @' l o t E D<br />

New York, New York 10036 Newark, NJ 07102<br />

SO ORDERED,<br />

Hon. Sherry Klein Heitler<br />

APR 2 6 20<strong>11</strong><br />

NEW YORK<br />

~O~~+l"'Y CLERK'S OFFICE<br />

N J/403242v 1


~ ~ ~ ~~ ~ .~<br />

1-<br />

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK<br />

COUNTY OF NEW YORK<br />

...<br />

In Re: NEW YORK CITYASBESTOS LITIGATION<br />

WILLIAM EDWARD TURNER and ZELLA<br />

FARIS ZELLA,<br />

Plaintiff(@,<br />

-against-<br />

Index No. : 190349/2009<br />

NO OPPOSITION<br />

SUMMARY JUDGMENT<br />

MOTION AND ORDER<br />

A.O. SMITH WATER PRODUCTS, et al.,<br />

Defendants.<br />

WHEREFORE, Defendant CURTISS-WRIGHT FLOW CONTROL CORPORATION,<br />

named Individually and as Successor to Farris Valves and/or Sprague Pumps (“CURTISS-<br />

WRIGHT”) hereby requests Summary Judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil<br />

Practice Law and Rules Section 3212, dismissing plaintiff‘s complaint against Defendant Curtiss-<br />

Wright with prejudice, and there being no opposition thereto,<br />

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against<br />

Defendant, Curtiss-Wright be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and without costs<br />

CAMBRIDGE<br />

850 Third Avenue, Suite 1 100<br />

New York, NY 10022


THOMAS WILLIAMS and<br />

KATHLEEN WILLIAMS, his wife,<br />

-against-<br />

Plaintiffs,<br />

NEW YORK CITY ASBESTOS<br />

LITIGATION (NYCAL)<br />

ASBESTOS MATTER<br />

INDEX NO.: 190350/2009<br />

NO OPPOSITION SUMMARY<br />

JUDGMENT MOTION AND ORDER<br />

GENERAL ELECTRIC COMPANY, et al.<br />

WHEWFORE, defendant AMEC Construction Management, I C. (“ACMI”), sued<br />

incorrectly herein “individually, as successor to and formerly known as The Morse Diesel<br />

Company and Morse Diesel International, Inc.,” hereby requests summary judgment in the<br />

above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 32 12, dismissing<br />

Plaintiffs’ Complaint against defendant, ACMI with prejudice, and there being no opposition<br />

thereto,<br />

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and crossclaims against<br />

defendant ACMI be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and without costs.<br />

Dated: New Y rk, New York<br />

8 ,20<strong>11</strong><br />

Salvatore G. Gangemi<br />

<strong>11</strong>0 William Street, <strong>26</strong>‘h Floor<br />

700 White Plains Road, Suite 338<br />

New Yark, New York 10038<br />

Scarsdale, New York 10583<br />

(212) <strong>26</strong>7-3091 (914) 725-5800<br />

Attorneys for Plaintiffs<br />

Attorneys for Defendants AMEC


NYCAL<br />

I.A.S. Part 30<br />

(Judge Heitler)<br />

Index No. : 190350-2009<br />

-against-<br />

Plaintiffs,<br />

A. W. CHESTERTON COMPNAY, et a1 ,<br />

NO OPPOSITION<br />

SUMMARY JUDGMENT<br />

MOTION AND ORDER<br />

RE: APRIL 20<strong>11</strong> IN-<br />

WHEREFORE, defendant EX-FM, INC. f/k/a FISCHBACH & MOORE, INC.,<br />

hereby request summary judgement in the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law<br />

and Rules Section 3212, dismissing plaintiffs' complaint against defendant EX-FM, INC. f/k/a<br />

FISCHBACH & MOORE, INC., with prejudice, and there being no opposition thereto,<br />

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants all claims and cross claims against<br />

defendant EX-FM, INC. f/k/a FISCXXBACH & MOORE, INC., be and the same are hereby<br />

dismissed with prejudice and without costs.<br />

Dated: Albertson, New York<br />

/+: 1 $ ,20<strong>11</strong><br />

%<br />

KUSH SHUKLA, ESQ<br />

Wilentz Goldman & Spitzer, P.A.<br />

. .<br />

Attorcey fcr PlaLEaff---- - --- -. I<br />

<strong>11</strong>0 William Street - <strong>26</strong>" Floor<br />

New York, New York 10038<br />

SO ORDERED,<br />

AHMUTY, DEMERS & McMANUS<br />

- - -?2mrneys fa D M a - __ -<br />

EX-FM, INC. f/k/a FISCHBACH<br />

& MOORE, INC.,<br />

200 I.U. Willets Road<br />

Albertson, New York <strong>11</strong>50<br />

FILED<br />

(516) 535-5433<br />

--Our File No.: TFZ 000102 FAQpR 2 6 ZO'


NYCAL<br />

I.A.S. Part 30<br />

Hon. Sherry Klein Heitler, J.S.C.<br />

NATHANIEL MURRAY,<br />

Index No.: 190036-2010<br />

-against-<br />

Plaintiffs,<br />

NO OPPOSITION SUMMARY JUDGMENT<br />

MOTION AND ORDER<br />

BONDEX INTERNATIONAL, INC et al. including,<br />

FOSTER WHEELER, LLC,<br />

Defendants.<br />

WHEREFORE, defendant FOSTER WHEELER, LLC hereby request summary judgment in the<br />

above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212, dismissing plaintiffs'<br />

complaint against defendant FOSTER WHEELER, LLC with prejudice, and there being no opposition<br />

thereto,<br />

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against defendant<br />

FOSTER WHEELER, LLC be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and without costs.<br />

New York, New York 10036<br />

Stephen Novakidis, Esq.<br />

Sedgwick, Detert, Moran & Arnold, UP<br />

Attorneys for Foster Wheeler, LLC<br />

ee Gateway CentV21 F t<br />

Newark, NJ 07102<br />

E 0<br />

SO ORDERED,<br />

NJh77254vl


SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK<br />

COUNTY OF NEW YORK<br />

IN RE: NEW YORK COUNTY / NYCAL<br />

ASBESTOS LITIGATION i I.A.S. Part 30<br />

i (Heitler, J.)<br />

THIS DOCUMENT REFERS TO:<br />

j Index No.: 190052/10<br />

HILLIARD YOUNG AND SHIRLEY YOUNG,<br />

-against-<br />

Plaintiffs,<br />

ANCHOR PACKING COMPANY, et al.,<br />

i NO OPPOSITION<br />

! SUMMARY JUDGMENT<br />

; MOTION AND OFtDER<br />

Defendants.<br />

WHEREFORE, defendant, Kentile Floors, Inc., hereby requests summary judgment in<br />

the above entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules 6 3212, dismissing plaintiffs'<br />

complaint against defendant, Kentile Floors, Inc., with prejudice in this action, and there being<br />

no opposition thereto,<br />

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against<br />

defendant, Kentile Floors, Inc., be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and without<br />

costs.<br />

Dated: New York, New York<br />

dPPIl- ,20<strong>11</strong><br />

Carol Tempesta, Esq. '<br />

Attorney for Defendant<br />

Kentile Floors, Inc.<br />

Hilliard Young and Shirley Young<br />

MCGIVNEY & KLUGER, P.C.<br />

WEITZ & LUXENBERG, P.C. A p 2 ~ 6<br />

80 Broad Street-Suite 2300<br />

700 Broadway<br />

New York, New York 100<strong>04</strong><br />

New York, New York 10003<br />

(212) 509-3456 (212) 558-5500<br />

r,(3W ( I(<br />

209<br />

SO ORDERED,<br />

2082-8993<br />

NO0 17365-2


SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK<br />

COUNTY OF NEW YORK<br />

IN RE NEW YORK CITY ASBESTOS LITIGATION NYCAL<br />

Hon, Sherry Klein Heitler<br />

CARLOS E. SIMMONS,<br />

X<br />

X<br />

Index No. 190062-2010<br />

-against-<br />

Plaintiff (s),<br />

NO OPPOSITION<br />

SUMMARY JUDGMENT MOTION AND<br />

ORDER<br />

A.O. SMITH WATER PRODUCTS, INC. et al,, including<br />

FOSTER WHEELER, LLC,<br />

Defendants.<br />

X<br />

WHEREFORE, defendant FOSTER WHEELER, LLC hereby requests summary judgment in the<br />

above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212, dismissing plaintiffs'<br />

complaint against defendant FOSTER WHEELER, LLC with prejudice, and there being no opposition<br />

thereto,<br />

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against defendant<br />

FOSTER WHEELER, LLC be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and without costs.<br />

Dated:<br />

New York, New York<br />

Joseph& Belluck, Esq.<br />

Belluc Fox, LLP<br />

Attorneys for Plaintflfs<br />

546 Fifth Avenue, qfh Floor<br />

New York, NY 10036<br />

Stephen hal6dis, Esq.<br />

Sedgwick, Detert, Mora@& flmpld,<br />

Attorneys for Foster W$@/er$ L&<br />

Three Gateway Center, 12fh Floor<br />

Newark, NJ 07102<br />

i:;h<br />

SO ORDERED,<br />

Hon. Sherry Klweitler, J.S.C.


<strong>04</strong>/08/20<strong>11</strong> 15:14 FAX<br />

212 986 2255<br />

EARLY STRAUSS<br />

0 002/002<br />

I<br />

/<br />

-against-<br />

I<br />

WHEREFOHF,, Dcfondent F1X)WSERVE CORPORATION SUCCESSOR IN INTEREST TO<br />

DURAMETntlJC CORPORATION, incomdy sued 8.9 "PLOWSERVE US, INC. (individually<br />

opposition thcrora,<br />

I<br />

ORDEFWD, that upon norice tn all co-dcfmdnstrs, all claims a d<br />

cr0.u~ claim against OcI'mdanr<br />

I)wamelallic be and the mnu arc hmby dismiosed with ptajudiec nnrl withaui coats to ciiher parry<br />

Dated: New Yotk, New York<br />

----I.-_.


COUNTY OF NEW YORK<br />

IN RE NEW YORK CITY ASBESTOS LlTlGATJON NYCAL<br />

I.A.S. Part 30<br />

(Heitler, J.)<br />

FRANK X. HELSTAB AND<br />

MELINDA J. HELSTAB,<br />

-against-<br />

AETNA HEALTH, INC., et. at.<br />

-<br />

Plaintiffs,<br />

X<br />

X<br />

IndexNo. 190157/10<br />

NO OPPOSITION<br />

SUMMARY JUDGMENT MOTION<br />

AND ORDER<br />

- - - ..<br />

_. __<br />

Defendants.<br />

X<br />

WHEREFORE, defendant AETNA HEALTH INC. (Individually and as a Successor to ONE LIBERTY<br />

PLAZA HOLDINGS, INC.), erroneously sued as Successor to ONE LIBERTY PLAZA HOLDINGS, INC.,<br />

(”AETNA HEALTH”), and AETNA INC. (Individually and as a Successor to NYL CARE HEALTH PLANS, INC.<br />

and ONE LIBERTY PLAZA HOLDINGS INC.) erroneously sued as Successor to NYL CARE HEALTH PLANS,<br />

INC. AND ONE LIBERTY PLAZA HOLDINGS, INC. ,(“AETNA INC.”) (collectively and hereinafter “AETNA”)<br />

hereby request summary judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 32 12,<br />

dismissing plaintiffs’ complaint against defendant AETNA with prejudice, and there being no opposition thereto,<br />

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against defendant AETNA be<br />

and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and without costs.<br />

Dated:<br />

New York. New York<br />

Attorneys for Plaintiffs<br />

SEDGWICK, DETER, MORXN &-ARNOLD,<br />

LLC<br />

Attorneys for Aetna<br />

Three Gateway Center, 1 Zth Floor<br />

360 Lexington Avenue, 20th Floor APR 2 6 20”<br />

New York, NY 10017


SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK<br />

COUNTY OF NEW YORK<br />

IN FtE: NEW YORK COUNTY<br />

j NYCAL<br />

ASBESTOS LITIGATION<br />

j I.A.S. Part 30<br />

! (Heitler, J.)<br />

THIS DOCUMENT REFERS TO:<br />

i Index No.: 190166/10<br />

LOUIS DIGILIO,<br />

-against-<br />

A. C. & S., INC., et al.,<br />

Plaintiffs,<br />

Defendants.<br />

j NO OPPOSITION<br />

j SUMMARY JUDGMENT<br />

j MOTION AND ORDER<br />

i<br />

WHEREFORE, defendant, Treadwell Corporation, hereby requests summary judgment in<br />

the above entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules 9 3212, dismissing plaintiffs'<br />

complaint against defendant, Treadwell Corporation, with prejudice in this action, and there<br />

being no opposition thereto,<br />

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against<br />

defendant, Treadwell Corporation, be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and<br />

without costs.<br />

Attorney for Defendant<br />

Treadwell Corporation<br />

MCGIVNEY & KLUGER, P.C.<br />

80 Broad Street-Suite 2300<br />

New Y ork, New Y ork 100<strong>04</strong><br />

(212) 509-3456<br />

I L E D<br />

Louis Digilio<br />

Weitz&Luxenberg,~.~.F<br />

700 Broadway<br />

New Y ork, New Y ork 10003<br />

(212) 558-5500 APR 2 6 20<strong>11</strong><br />

N0038955-1


SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK<br />

COUNTY OF NEW YORK<br />

IN RE: NEW YORK COUNTY i NYCAL<br />

ASBESTOS LITIGATION<br />

THIS DOCUMENT REFERS TO:<br />

LOUIS DIGILIO,<br />

i I.A.S. Part 30<br />

i (Heitler, J.)<br />

j Index No.: 190166/10<br />

-against-<br />

A. C. & S., INC., et al.,<br />

Plaintiffs,<br />

: NO OPPOSITION<br />

SUMMARY JUDGMENT<br />

i MOTION AND ORDER<br />

Defendants. i<br />

WHEREFORE, defendant, Flowserve Corporation fMa The Duriron Company, Inc.,<br />

hereby requests summary judgment in the above entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law<br />

C..<br />

I<br />

and Rules 8 3212, dismissing plaintiffs’ complaint against defendant, Flowserve Corporation<br />

fMa The Duriron Company, Inc., with prejudice in this action, and there being no opposition<br />

thereto,<br />

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against<br />

defendant, Flowserve Corporation fMa The Duriron Company, Inc., be and the same are hereby<br />

dismissed with prejudice and without costs.<br />

Attorney for Defendant<br />

Flowserve Corporation<br />

MCGIVNEY & KLUGER, P.C.<br />

80 Broad Street-Suite 2300<br />

New York, New York 100<strong>04</strong><br />

(212) 509-3456<br />

SO ORDERED,<br />

N0038955-1<br />

9Attorney Louis Digilio for Plaintiffs FILED<br />

*..a<br />

Weitz & Luxenberg, P.C.<br />

700 Broadway<br />

NewYork,NewYork10003 APR 2 6 201’<br />

NEW YORK<br />

CLERKS OFFICE<br />

co,,Nn<br />

951-0882<br />

APR 152Otl1


SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK<br />

COUNTY OF NEW YORK<br />

IN RE: NEW YORK COUNTY<br />

! NYCAL<br />

ASBESTOS LITIGATION<br />

j I.A.S. Part 30<br />

i (Heitler, J.)<br />

THIS DOCUMENT REFERS TO:<br />

j Index No.: 190166/10<br />

LOUIS DIGILIO,<br />

A. C. & S., INC., et al.,<br />

Plaintiffs, i NO OPPOSITION<br />

i SUMMARY JUDGMENT<br />

-against- [ MOTION AND ORDER<br />

Defendants.<br />

WHEREFORE, defendant, Courter & Company, Inc., hereby requests<br />

judgment in the above entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules 6 3212, I<br />

summary<br />

ismissing<br />

plaintiffs’ complaint against defendant, Courter & Company, Inc., with prejudice in this action,<br />

and there being no opposition thereto,<br />

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against<br />

defendant, Courter & Company, Inc., be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and<br />

without costs,<br />

Louis Digilio<br />

MCGIVNEY & KLUGER, P.C.<br />

Weitz & Luxenberg, P.C.<br />

80 Broad Street-Suite 2300<br />

700 Broadway<br />

New York, New York 100<strong>04</strong><br />

(212) 509-3456 (212) 558-5500<br />

New York, New York IoOOF 1 L E D<br />

N0038955-1<br />

<strong>11</strong>22-23705


SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK<br />

COUNTY OF NEW YON<br />

IN RE: NEW YORK COUNTY<br />

! NYCAL<br />

ASBESTOS LITIGATION<br />

j I.A.S. Part 30<br />

j (Heitler, J.)<br />

THIS DOCUMENT REFERS TO:<br />

j Index No.: 190166/10<br />

LOUIS DIGILIO,<br />

-against-<br />

A. C. & S., INC., et al.,<br />

Plaintiffs,<br />

i NO OPPOSITION<br />

! SUMMARY JUDGMENT<br />

i MOTION AND ORDER<br />

Defendants. !<br />

WHEREFORE, defendant, The Fairbanks Company, hereby requests summary judgment<br />

in the above entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules 0 3212, dismissing<br />

plaintiffs' complaint against defendant, The Fairbanks Company, with prejudice in this action,<br />

and there being no opposition thereto,<br />

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against<br />

defendant, The Fairbanks Company, be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and<br />

without costs.<br />

-- "<br />

Okwedeo N. Okoh, Esq.<br />

Attorney for Defendant<br />

The Fairbanks Company<br />

MCGIVNEY & KLUGER, P.C.<br />

80 Broad Street-Suite 2300<br />

New York, New York 100<strong>04</strong><br />

(212) 509-3456<br />

1<br />

Attorney for Plaintiffs<br />

Louis Digilio<br />

Weitz & Luxenberg, P.C.<br />

700 Broadway<br />

New York, New York 1000<br />

(212) 558-5500<br />

F\LE"<br />

SO ORDERED,<br />

Hon. She&<br />

5<strong>04</strong>-0621<br />

N0038955-1<br />

APR 15 20<strong>11</strong>


SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK<br />

COUNTY OF NEW YORK<br />

IN RE: NEW YORK COUNTY / NYCAL<br />

ASBESTOS LITIGATION<br />

j I.A.S. Part 30<br />

j (Heitler, J.)<br />

THIS DOCUMENT REFERS TO:<br />

j Index No.: 190166/10<br />

LOUIS DIGILIO,<br />

Plaintiffs, i NO OPPOSITION<br />

! SUMMARY JUDGMENT<br />

-against- j MOTION AND ORDER<br />

A. C. & S., INC., et al., I<br />

Defendants. !<br />

WHEREFORE, defendant, Kentile Floors, Inc., hereby requests summary judgment in<br />

the above entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules 6 3212, dismissing plaintiffs'<br />

complaint against defendant, Kentile Floors, Inc., with prejudice in this action, and there being<br />

no opposition thereto,<br />

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against<br />

defendant, Kentile Floors, Inc., be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and without<br />

costs.<br />

Dated: New York, New York<br />

4<strong>11</strong> ,20<strong>11</strong><br />

Carol M. Tempesta, Esq.<br />

Attorney for Defendant<br />

Kentile Floors, Inc.<br />

MCGIVNEY & KLUGER, P.C.<br />

80 Broad Street-Suite 2300<br />

New York, New York 100<strong>04</strong><br />

(212) 509-3456<br />

Attorney for Plaintiffs<br />

Louis Digilio<br />

Weitz & Luxenberg, P.C.<br />

700 Broadway<br />

New York, New York 10003<br />

(212) 558-5500<br />

SO ORDERED,<br />

N0038955-1<br />

2082-9449<br />

APR 1520<strong>11</strong> - a<br />

59aV


SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK<br />

ALL COUNTIES WITHIN NEW YORK CITY<br />

X<br />

IN RE: NEW YORK COUNTY I.A.S. Part 30<br />

ASBESTOS LITIGATION<br />

(Judge Heitler)<br />

X<br />

This Document Relates to:<br />

Index No.:190182/10<br />

Richard W. Duquette and Doris H.<br />

Duquet te ,<br />

Plaintiffs,<br />

- against - NO OPPOSITION<br />

SUMMARY JUDGMENT<br />

A.W. Chesterton Co., et al.,<br />

MOTION AND ORDER<br />

_________________I_--------<br />

NYCAL<br />

requests summary judgment in the above-entitled case,<br />

pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 83212,<br />

dismissing plaintiffs' Complaint against defendant Goulds<br />

Pumps Inc., with prejudice, and there being no opposition<br />

thereto,<br />

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, a<strong>11</strong><br />

claims and cross claims against defendant Goulds Pumps<br />

Inc., be dismissed with prejudice and without costs<br />

I<br />

I<br />

d<br />

Cullen and Dykman LLP<br />

Attorneys for Plaintiffs<br />

Richard W. Duquette and Doris Goulds Pumps Inc.<br />

H. Duquette 177 Montague Street<br />

360 Lexington Ave, lyn, New York <strong>11</strong>201<br />

New York, NY 10017<br />

le No.: 6754-<strong>11</strong>018<br />

So Ordered:<br />

/


NYCAL<br />

I.A.S. Part 30<br />

Hon. Sherry Klein Heitler, J.S.C.<br />

ALEJANDRO BAUTISTA,<br />

Index No.: 190197-2010<br />

-against-<br />

AMERICAN STANDARD et al. including,<br />

GENERAL ELECTRIC COMPANY,<br />

Plaintiffs,<br />

NO OPPOSITION SUMMARY JUDGMENT<br />

MOTION AND ORDER<br />

Defendants.<br />

WHEREFORE, defendant GENERAL ELECTRIC COMPANY hereby request summary judgment in<br />

the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212, dismissing plaintiffs'<br />

complaint against defendant GENERAL ELECTRIC COMPANY with prejudice, and there being no<br />

opposition thereto,<br />

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against defendant<br />

GENERAL ELECTRIC COMPANY be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and without costs.<br />

Stephen Novakidis, Esq.<br />

-ẇ2e-<br />

Sedgwick, Detert, Moran & Arnold, LLP<br />

Attorney for Pluintqfs<br />

Attorneys for General Electric Company<br />

546 Fifth Avenue, 4'h Floor<br />

Three Gateway Center, 12fh Floor<br />

New York, New York 10036 Newark,NJ07102 I<br />

SO ORDERED,<br />

Hon. Sherry KW Heitler<br />

NJI43273Yvl


I<br />

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK<br />

COUNTY OF NEW YORK<br />

IN RE: NEW YORK COUNTY<br />

! NYCAL<br />

ASBESTOS LITIGATION<br />

j I.A.S. Part 30<br />

/ (Heitler, J.)<br />

THIS DOCUMENT REFERS TO:<br />

j Index No.: 1902<strong>26</strong>/10<br />

WILHELM PRANGE AND ROSEMARY<br />

PRANGE,<br />

i NO OPPOSITION<br />

Plaintiffs, i SUMMARY JUDGMENT<br />

j MOTION AND ORDER<br />

-against-<br />

A. C. & S., INC., et al.,<br />

Defendants.<br />

j<br />

WHEREFORE, defendant, Patterson Pump Co., hereby requests summary judgment in<br />

the above entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules 5 3212, dismissing plaintiffs’<br />

complaint against defendant, Patterson Pump Co., with prejudice in this action, and there being<br />

no opposition thereto,<br />

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against<br />

defendant, Patterson Pump Co., be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and without<br />

costs.<br />

Dated: New York, New York<br />

Patterson Pump Co.<br />

MCGIVNEY & KLUGER, P.C.<br />

Weitz & Luxenberg, P.C.<br />

80 Broad Street-Suite 2300<br />

700 Broadway<br />

New York, New York 100<strong>04</strong><br />

New York, New York 10003<br />

(2 12) 509-3456 (212) 558-5500<br />

SO ORDERED,<br />

NO0389551<br />

454-1 1948<br />

0


NYCAL<br />

I.A.S. Part 30<br />

Won. Sherry Klein Heitler, J.S.C.<br />

WILHELM PFUNGE and ROSEMARY PFUNGE,<br />

Index No.: 1902<strong>26</strong>-2010<br />

-against-<br />

Plaintiff,<br />

NO OPPOSITION<br />

SUMMARY JUDGMENT MOTION<br />

AND ORDER<br />

ANCHOR PACKING COMPANY, et al., including<br />

JOHNSON & TOWERS, INC.,<br />

Defendants.<br />

WHEREFORE, defendant JOHNSON & TOWERS, INC. hereby request summary judgment in<br />

the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212, dismissing plaintiffs<br />

complaint against defendant JOHNSON & TOWERS, WC. with prejudice, and there being no<br />

opposition thereto,<br />

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against defendant<br />

JOHNSON & TOWERS, INC. be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and without costs.<br />

Dated:<br />

New York New York<br />

Attorneys for Pluintfls<br />

700 Broadway<br />

New York, New York 10003<br />

(212) 558-5500 n (973) 242-0002<br />

Attorneys for Johnson & Towers, Inc.<br />

Three Gateway Center, 12fh Floor<br />

Newark, NJ 071 02<br />

SO ORDERED,<br />

Hon. Sherry Klein H>tler, Hztler, J.S.C.<br />

NJl433724v1<br />

15 20<strong>11</strong><br />

AF'R 2 6 20<strong>11</strong><br />

NEW YORK<br />

SOUIW*Y CLERK'S OFFICE


TMc:CCCjpk)<br />

3128<strong>11</strong> 1<br />

WHEREFORE, defendant Consolidated Edison Company of New York, Inc.<br />

hereby requests summary judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law<br />

and Rules Section 3212, dismissing plaintiffs complaint against defendant Consolidated Edison<br />

Company of New York, Inc. with prejudice, and there being no opposition thereto,<br />

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross-claims<br />

against defendant Consolidated Edison Company of New York, Inc., be and the same are hereby<br />

dismissed with prejudice and without costs.<br />

Dated: New York, New York<br />

Attorneys for Plaintiff<br />

700 Broadway<br />

New York, NY 100035<br />

on Company of New<br />

York, Inc.<br />

4 Irving Place<br />

w York, NY p Or3t8 E D<br />

SO ORDERED: *PR 2 6 20<strong>11</strong><br />

Our File No<br />

S-4 12 1-1 0


SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK<br />

COUNTY’ OF NEW YORK<br />

In Re: NEW YORK CITYASBESTOS LITIGATION<br />

Index No.: 10/190243<br />

ALPHONSE MAGLIO,<br />

- against -<br />

Plaintiff( s),<br />

NO OPPOSITION<br />

SUMMARY JUDGMENT<br />

MOTION<br />

AC and S, INC., (ARMSGTRONG<br />

CONTRACTING & SUPPLY) et al.,<br />

Defendants.<br />

WHEIREFORE, Defendant WEIL-MCLAIN COMPANY, INC., hereinafter (‘WEIL-<br />

MCLAN’) hereby requests Summary Judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil<br />

Practice Law and Rules Section 3212, dismissing plaintiff’s complaint against Defendant Weil-<br />

McLain with prejudice, and there being no opposition thereto,<br />

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against<br />

Defendant, Weil-McLain be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and without costs<br />

to either party.<br />

Dated: q/q ,20<strong>11</strong><br />

/<br />

i(* Jennifer L. Budner, Esq<br />

WEITZ & LUXENBERG, P.C.<br />

SEGAL McCAMBRIDGE<br />

Attorneys for Plaintiff<br />

SINGER & MAHONEY, LTD.<br />

700 Broadway Attorneys for Defendant<br />

New York, NY 10003<br />

(212) 558-5500<br />

Weil-McLain<br />

850 Third Avenue, Suite <strong>11</strong>00<br />

New York, NY 10022<br />

F I L E p<br />

SO ORDERED,<br />

APR 2 6 20<strong>11</strong><br />

NEi& YORK<br />

WUNTY CLERK’S


SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK<br />

COUNTY OF NEW YORK<br />

IN RE: NEW YORK COUNTY<br />

NYCAL<br />

ASBESTOS LITIGATION<br />

I.A.S, Part 30<br />

(Heitler, J.)<br />

THIS DOCUMENT REFERS TO:<br />

Index No.: 190243/10<br />

ALPHONSE MAGLIO,<br />

-against-<br />

A. C. & S., INC., et al.,<br />

Plaintiffs,<br />

Defendants.<br />

NO OPPOSITION<br />

SUMMARY JUDGMENT<br />

MOTION AND ORDER<br />

WHEREFORE, defendant, Oakfabco, Inc., hereby requests summary judgment in the<br />

above entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules 6 3212, dismissing plaintiffs'<br />

complaint against defendant, Oakfabco, Inc., with prejudice in this action, and there being no<br />

opposition thereto,<br />

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against<br />

defendant, Oakfabco, Inc., be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and without<br />

costs,<br />

Dated: New Y,ork, New York<br />

Robert Da&h, Esq.<br />

Attorney for Defendant<br />

Oakfabco, Inc.<br />

Alphonse Maglio<br />

MCGIVNEY & KLUGER, P.C.<br />

Weitz & Luxenberg, P.C.<br />

80 Broad Street-Suite 2300<br />

700 Broadway<br />

New York, New York 100<strong>04</strong><br />

New Y ork, New Y ork 10003<br />

(212) 509-3456 (212) 558-5500<br />

FILED<br />

APR 2 6 20<strong>11</strong><br />

SO ORDERED,<br />

Hon. Sherry Klein Heitler<br />

2571 -0033<br />

NEW YORK<br />

CLERK'S OFFICE'<br />

N0038955-1


SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK<br />

COUNTY OF NEW YON<br />

IN RE: NEW YORK COUNTY<br />

j NYCAL<br />

ASBESTOS LITIGATION<br />

j I.A.S. Part 30<br />

j (Heitler, J.)<br />

THIS DOCUMENT REFERS TO:<br />

j Index No,: 190243/10<br />

ALPHONSE MAGLIO,<br />

A. C. & S., TNC., et al.,<br />

Plaintiffs, i NO OPPOSITION<br />

! SUMMARY JUDGMENT<br />

-against- j MOTION AND ORDER<br />

Defendants.<br />

WHEREFORE, defendant, Columbia Boiler, hereby requests summary judgment in the<br />

I<br />

above entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules 8 3212, dismissing plaintiffs'<br />

complaint against defendant, Columbia Boiler, with prejudice in this action, and there being no<br />

opposition thereto,<br />

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against<br />

defendant, Columbia Boiler, be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and without<br />

costs.<br />

,201 1<br />

chd% H- k5USWl'E4t.<br />

Carol M. Ternpesta, Esq.<br />

Attorney for Defendant<br />

Attorney for Plaintiffs<br />

Columbia Boiler<br />

Alphonse Maglio<br />

MCGIVNEY & KLUGER, P.C.<br />

Weitz & Luxenberg, P.C.<br />

SO Broad Street-Suite 2300<br />

700 Broadway<br />

New York, New York 100<strong>04</strong><br />

New York, New York 10<br />

(2 12) 509-3456 (212) 558-5500<br />

SO ORDERED,<br />

Hon. Sherry Klein'Heitler<br />

APR 2 6 201'<br />

NEW YORK<br />

2SedbNm CLERK'S OFF-<br />

N0038955-1<br />

APR 15 20<strong>11</strong>


SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YON<br />

COUNTY OF NEW YORK<br />

IN RE: NEW YORK COUNTY<br />

j NYCAL<br />

ASBESTOS LITIGATION<br />

j I.A.S. Part 30<br />

j (Heitler, J.)<br />

THIS DOCUMENT REFERS TO:<br />

j Index No.: 190243/10<br />

ALPHONSE MAGLIO,<br />

A. C. & S,, INC., et al.,<br />

Plaintiffs , ; NO OPPOSITION<br />

! SUMMARY JUDGMENT<br />

-against- j MOTION AND ORDER<br />

Defendants.<br />

WHEREFORE, defendant, Kentile Floors, Inc., hereby requests summary judgment in<br />

the above entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules 8 3212, dismissing plaintiffs’<br />

complaint against defendant, Kentile Floors, Inc., with prejudice in this action, and there being<br />

no opposition thereto,<br />

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against<br />

defendant, Kentile Floors, Inc., be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and without<br />

costs.<br />

Dated: New York, New York<br />

&a<br />

,20<strong>11</strong><br />

Carol M. Tempesta, Esq.<br />

Attorney for Defendant<br />

Kentile Floors, Inc.<br />

MCGIVNEY & KLUGER, P.C.<br />

80 Broad Street-Suite 2300<br />

New York, New York 100<strong>04</strong><br />

(212) 509-3456<br />

Attorney for Plaintiffs<br />

Alphonse Maglio<br />

Weitz & Luxenberg, P.C.<br />

700 Broadway<br />

New York, New York 10003 FILED<br />

(212) 558-5500<br />

APR 2 6 20<strong>11</strong><br />

SO ORDERED,<br />

N0038955-1<br />

Hon. Sherry Klein Heitler<br />

NEW YORK<br />

COU~ CLERKS OFF-]<br />

2082-9579


SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK<br />

COUNTY OF NEW YORK<br />

IN RE: NEW YORK COUNTY / NYCAL<br />

ASBESTOS LITIGATION : I.A.S. Part 30<br />

i (Heitler, J.)<br />

THIS DOCUMENT REFERS TO:<br />

j Index No.: 190243/10<br />

ALPHONSE MAGLIO,<br />

-against-<br />

A. C. & S., INC., et al.,<br />

Plaintiffs, \ NO OPPOSITION<br />

SUMMARY JUDGMENT<br />

i MOTION AND ORDER<br />

Defendants.<br />

j<br />

WHEREFORE, defendant, National Boiler Works, Inc., hereby requests summary<br />

judgment in the above entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules 0 3212, dismissing<br />

plaintiffs’ complaint against defendant, National Boiler Works, Inc., with prejudice in this<br />

action, and there being no opposition thereto,<br />

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against<br />

defendant, National Boiler Works, Inc., be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and<br />

without costs.<br />

Dated: New,York, New York<br />

Mattyie‘w w T. Fair1 422+<br />

Attorney for Defendant<br />

Attorney for Plaintiffs<br />

National Boiler Works, Inc.<br />

Alphonse Maglio<br />

MCGIVNEY & KLUGER, P.C.<br />

Weitz & Luxenberg, P.C.<br />

80 Broad Street-Suite 2300<br />

700 Broadway<br />

New York, New York 100<strong>04</strong><br />

New York, New York 10003 FILED<br />

(212) 509-3456 (212) 558-5500<br />

fi<br />

SO ORDERED,<br />

Hon. Sherry Klein Heitler<br />

1801-27<br />

N0038955-1<br />

APR 2 6 201’


SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK<br />

COUNTY OF NEW YORK<br />

IN RE: NEW YORK COUNTY<br />

/ NYCAL<br />

ASBESTOS LITIGATION<br />

i I.A.S. Part 30<br />

i (Heitler, J.)<br />

THIS DOCUMENT REFERS TO:<br />

j Index No.: 190243/10<br />

ALPHONSE MAGLIO,<br />

A. C. & S., INC., et al.,<br />

Plaintiffs, i NO OPPOSITION<br />

! SUMMARY JUDGMENT<br />

-against- j MOTION AND ORDER<br />

Defendants.<br />

WHEREFORE, defendant, Courter & Company, Inc., hereby requests<br />

judgment in the above entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules (j 3212, ismissing<br />

plaintiffs’ complaint against defendant, Courter & Company, Inc., with prejudice in this action,<br />

and there being no opposition thereto,<br />

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against<br />

defendant, Courter & Company, Inc., be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and<br />

without costs.<br />

Courter & Codphny, Inc.<br />

Alphonse Maglio<br />

MCGIVNEY & KLUGER, P.C.<br />

Weitz & Luxenberg, P.C.<br />

SO Broad Street-Suite 2300<br />

700 Broadway<br />

New York, New York 100<strong>04</strong><br />

New York, New York 100<br />

(212) 509-3456 (212) 558-5500<br />

SO ORDERED, 2k.V<br />

w-<br />

Hon. Sherry Klein Heitler<br />

-<br />

<strong>11</strong>22-1277<br />

N0038955-1


SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK<br />

COUNTY OF NEW YORK<br />

IN RE: NEW YORK COUNTY<br />

NYCAL<br />

ASBESTOS LITIGATION<br />

LA.% Part 30<br />

(Heitler, J.)<br />

THIS DOCUMENT REFERS TO:<br />

Index No.: 190243/10<br />

ALPHONSE MAGLIO,<br />

-against-<br />

A. C. & S., INC., et al.,<br />

Plaintiffs,<br />

Defendants.<br />

NO OPPOSITION<br />

SUMMARY JUDGMENT<br />

MOTION AND ORDER<br />

WHEREFORE, defendant, Aurora Pump Company, hereby requests summary judgment<br />

in the above entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules § 3212, dismissing<br />

plaintiffs’ complaint against defendant, Aurora Pump Company, with prejudice in this action,<br />

and there being no opposition thereto,<br />

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against<br />

defendant, Aurora Pump Company, be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and<br />

without costs +<br />

Dated: New Y k, New York<br />

4p ,20<strong>11</strong><br />

Attorney for Defendant<br />

Attorney for Plaintiffs<br />

Aurora Pump Company<br />

Alphonse Maglio<br />

MCGIVNEY & KLUGER, P.C.<br />

Weitz & Luxenberg, P.C.<br />

80 Broad Street-Suite 2300<br />

700 Broadway<br />

New York, New York 100<strong>04</strong><br />

New York, New York 10003<br />

(212) 509-3456 (212) 558-5500<br />

ApR 2 6 2O’<br />

SO ORDERED,<br />

1003-03&~<br />

N0038955-1


SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YON<br />

COUNTY OF NEW YORK<br />

IN RE? NEW YORK COUNTY<br />

! NYCAL<br />

ASBESTOS LITIGATION<br />

i I.A.S. Part 30<br />

(Heitler, J.)<br />

THIS DOCUMENT REFERS TO:<br />

/ Index No.: 190243/10<br />

ALPHONSE MAGLIO,<br />

-against-<br />

A. C. & S,, INC., et al.,<br />

Plaintiffs,<br />

i NO OPPOSITION<br />

j SUMMARY JUDGMENT<br />

i MOTION AND ORDER<br />

Defendants. [<br />

WHEREFORE, defendant, The Fairbanks Company, hereby requests summary judgment<br />

in the above entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules 0 3212, dismissing<br />

plaintiffs' complaint against defendant, The Fairbanks Company, with prejudice in this action,<br />

and there being no opposition thereto,<br />

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against<br />

defendant, The Fairbanks Company, be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and<br />

without costs.<br />

Dated: New York, New York<br />

Attorney for Defendant<br />

Attorney for Plaintiffs<br />

The Fairbanks Company<br />

Alphonse Maglio<br />

MCGIVNEY & KLUGER, P.C.<br />

Weitz & Luxenberg, P.C.<br />

80 Broad Street-Suite 2300<br />

700 Broadway<br />

New York, New York 100<strong>04</strong><br />

New York, New York 10003<br />

(212) 509-3456 (212) 558-5500<br />

/-3<br />

\<br />

SO ORDERED,<br />

Hon. Sherry klein Heitler<br />

5<strong>04</strong>-0633<br />

FILED<br />

APR 2 6 20<strong>11</strong><br />

NFLV YORK<br />

W T Y CLERK'S OFFICE]<br />

N0038955-1<br />

APR 15 20<strong>11</strong>


A.O. SMITHE WATER PRODUCTS CO.,<br />

Defendants.<br />

d., '<br />

: Hon. Sherry Klein Heitler.<br />

: IAS Part 30<br />

WHEREFORE, defendants The Goodyear Tire & Rubber Company and Goodyear<br />

Canada Inc. hereby request summary judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to<br />

CPLR 3212, dismissing plaintiff's complaint against The Goodyear Tire & Rubber<br />

Company and Goodyear Canada Inc. with prejudice, and there being no opposition<br />

thereto, it is hereby:<br />

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims<br />

against The Goodyear Tire & Rubber Company and Goodyear Canada Inc. be and the<br />

same are<br />

+<br />

hereby dismissed with prejudice and without costs.<br />

Dated: New York, New York<br />

WEITZ & LUXENBERG, P.C. LYNCH DASKAL EMERY LLP<br />

Attorneys for Plaintiff<br />

Attorneys for Defendants T<br />

By:<br />

David Chandler<br />

700 Broadway<br />

New York, New York 10003<br />

(212) 558-5500 (212) 302-2400<br />

Lawrence G. Lee<br />

<strong>26</strong>4 West 40' Street FILED<br />

- -<br />

New York. New York 100 18<br />

APR 2 6 2 6<br />

Dated: New York, New York<br />

NEW YORK<br />

COUNTY CLERKS OFFICE'<br />

$0 ORDERED:<br />

Hon. Sherry Klein Heitler, J.S.C.


Plaintiff,<br />

-against-<br />

A.O. SMITHE WATER PRODUCTS CO.,<br />

Defendants.<br />

: NO OPPOSITION<br />

: SUMMARY JUDGMENT<br />

: MOTION AND ORDER<br />

A,, : Hon. Sherry Klein Heitler,<br />

1 IAS Part 30<br />

WHEREFORE, defendant Georgia-Pacific LLC hereby request summary<br />

judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to CPLR 3212, dismissing plaintiffs'<br />

complaint against Georgia-Pacific LLC with prejudice, and there being no opposition<br />

thereto, it is hereby:<br />

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims<br />

against Georgia-Pacific LLC be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and<br />

without costs.<br />

WEITZ & LUXENBERG, P.C.<br />

Attorneys for Plaintiff<br />

LYNCH DASKAL EMERY LLP<br />

By:<br />

700 Broadway<br />

<strong>26</strong>4 West 40' Street<br />

New York. New York 10003 New York. New York 10018<br />

(212) 558-5500 (212) 302-2400


~ Index<br />

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK<br />

COUNTY OF NEW YORK<br />

IN RE: NEW YORK COUNTY i NYCAL<br />

ASBESTOS LITIGATION j I.A.S. Part 30<br />

i (Heitler, J.)<br />

THIS DOCUMENT REFERS TO:<br />

EDWARD SCHMID AND CARISTINE<br />

SCHMID,<br />

-against-<br />

A. C. & S., INC., et ul.,<br />

Plaintiffs,<br />

No.: 190250/10<br />

NO OPPOSITION<br />

SUMMARY JUDGMENT<br />

MOTION AND ORDER<br />

Defendants.<br />

j<br />

WHEREFORE, defendant, Oakfabco, Inc., hereby requests summary judgment in the<br />

above entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules 9 3212, dismissing plaintiffs’<br />

complaint against defendant, Oakfabco, Inc., with prejudice in this action, and there being no<br />

opposition thereto,<br />

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against<br />

defendant, Oakfabco, Inc., be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and without<br />

costs.<br />

Dated: New York, New York<br />

Robert Darish, Esq.<br />

Attorney for Defendant<br />

Oakfabco, Inc.<br />

MCGIVNEY & KLUGER, P.C.<br />

80 Broad Street-Suite 2300<br />

New York, New York 100<strong>04</strong><br />

+.J<br />

(212) 509-3456 (212) 558-5500<br />

Edward Schrnid and Caristine<br />

Weitz & Luxenberg, P.C.<br />

700 Broadway<br />

New York, New York 10003<br />

20<strong>11</strong><br />

APR 2 6<br />

SO ORDERED,<br />

N0038955-1<br />

Hon. Sherry Klein &itler<br />

2571-0036


SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK<br />

COUNTY OF NEW YORK<br />

IN RE: NEW YORK COUNTY<br />

i NYCAL<br />

ASBESTOS LITIGATION<br />

j I.A.S. Part 30<br />

! (Heitler, J.)<br />

THIS DOCUMENT REFERS TO:<br />

j Index No.: 190250/10<br />

EDWARD SCHMID AND CARISTINE<br />

SCHMID,<br />

i NO OPPOSITION<br />

Plaintiffs, j SUMMARY JUDGMENT<br />

-against-<br />

A. C. & S., TNC,, et al.,<br />

Defendants. !<br />

i MOTION AND ORDER<br />

WHEREFORE, defendant, Kentile Floors, Inc., hereby requests summary judgment in<br />

the above entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules 6 3212, dismissing plaintiffs’<br />

complaint against defendant, Kentile Floors, Inc., with prejudice in this action, and there being<br />

no opposition thereto,<br />

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against<br />

defendant, Kentile Floors, Inc., be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and without<br />

costs.<br />

Dated: New York, New York<br />

y/J ,20<strong>11</strong><br />

uw<br />

Carol M. Tempesta, Esq.<br />

C am w. ‘=et*,&-%.<br />

Attorney for Defendant<br />

Attorney for Plaintiffs<br />

Kentile Floors, Inc.<br />

Edward Schmid and Caristine Schmid<br />

MCGIVNEY & KLUGER, P.C.<br />

Weitz 700 Broadway & Luxenberg, P.C. FILED<br />

80 Broad Street-Suite 2300<br />

New York, New York 100<strong>04</strong><br />

New York, New York 10003<br />

(212) 509-3456 (212) 558-5500 APR 2 6 20<strong>11</strong><br />

NEW YOHK<br />

SO ORDERED, . COUNT/ CLERKS OFFICE<br />

Hon. Sherry Klein Heitler<br />

2082-9733<br />

N0038955-1


I<br />

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK<br />

COUNTY OF NEW YORK<br />

' NYCAL<br />

CHRISTINE SCHMTD, as Executrix for the Estate of :<br />

Part 3o<br />

EDWARD F. SCHMID, and CHRISTINE SCHMID, : (Hen. Sherry Klein Heitler)<br />

Individually,<br />

Plaintiff(s),<br />

BURNHAM, LLC., et al.,<br />

-against-<br />

: Index Na. : 190250- 10<br />

: NO-OPPOSITION SUMMARY<br />

JUDGMENT MOTION ANI)<br />

ORDER<br />

Defendants.<br />

________________________________________-------------------------<br />

X<br />

WHEREFORE, defendant CRANE CO., on behalf of named defendants Crane Co. and<br />

Pacific Valves, Individually and as a subsidiary of Crane Co. (hereinafter "CRANE CO."),<br />

I<br />

!<br />

i<br />

j<br />

hereby requests summary judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law<br />

and Rules Section 3212, dismissing plaintiffs' complaint against defendant CRANE CO. with<br />

prejudice, and there being no opposition thereto,<br />

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against<br />

defendant CRANE CO. be, and the same are hereby, dismissed with prejudice and without costs.<br />

(I<br />

!<br />

WEITZ & LUXENB-.~.<br />

Attorneys for Plaintiff(s)<br />

700 Broadway<br />

CRANE CO.<br />

New York, NY 10003<br />

599 Lexington Avenue<br />

(212) 558-5500 w-York, NY 10022<br />

Hon. Sheiry KKn Heitler


~ I.A.S.<br />

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK<br />

COUNTY OF NEW YORK<br />

IN RE:<br />

This Document Relates to:<br />

MICHAEL V. MORENO<br />

NEW YORK CITY<br />

ASBESTOS LITIGATION<br />

against<br />

Part 30<br />

1 (Heitler, J.)<br />

I<br />

INDEX NO.: 190<strong>26</strong>2/10<br />

NO OPPOSITION<br />

SUMMARY JUDGMENT<br />

MOTION AND ORDER<br />

ABEX CORPORATION, ET AL<br />

WHEREFORE, defendant, Johnston Boiler Co., hereby requests summary judgment in<br />

the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212, dismissing<br />

plaintiffs' complaint against defendant, Johnston Boiler Co., with prejudice, and there being no<br />

opposition thereto,<br />

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against<br />

defendant, Johnston Boiler Co., be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and<br />

without costs.<br />

DATED: %Yo&dew York<br />

\ GcL\\<br />

HOAQLAND, LONQO<br />

MORAN. DUNST 8<br />

DOUKAS. LLP<br />

ATTORNEYS AT LAW<br />

NORTH JERSEY<br />

40 PATERSON ST<br />

PO BOX 480<br />

NWBRUNWCK, NJ<br />

SOUTH JERSEY<br />

701 WTSEY'S MILL RD<br />

SUITE 202<br />

HAMMONTON, NJ<br />

HOAGLAND, LONGO, MORAN<br />

DUNST & DOUKAS, LLP<br />

Attorneys for Defendant,<br />

Johnston Boiler Co.<br />

40 Paterson Street - PO Box 480<br />

New Brunswick, New Jersey 08903<br />

SO ORDERED: -<br />

Attor ne ys for Plaint iff (s),<br />

Michael V. Moreno<br />

800 Third Avenue - 13th Floor<br />

New York, NY 10022<br />

SHERRY KLEIN HEITLER


__________----_______________l_f________-------------~-----------~-<br />

X<br />

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK<br />

COUNTY OF NEW YORK<br />

STEVEN GOOD. as Personal Representative for the<br />

Estate of EDWARD T. GOOD,<br />

NYCAL - IAS Part 30<br />

-against-<br />

PI ain t i ffs,<br />

A.O. SMITH WATER PRODUCTS CO., et al,<br />

Defendants.<br />

_____*_r_________f_r_________r__________----------------------------<br />

X<br />

Honorable Sherry Klein Heitler<br />

Index No.: I90<strong>26</strong>3/10<br />

No Opposition Summary<br />

JudPment Motion and Order<br />

WHEREFORE, Defendant SLANT/FIN CORPORATION hereby requests summary<br />

judgment in the above entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212:<br />

dismissing the plaintiffs' Complaint against Defendant SLANT/FIN CORPORATION with<br />

prejudice, and there being no opposition thereto,<br />

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against<br />

Defendant SLANT/FIN CORPORATION, be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice<br />

and without costs.<br />

Dated: New York, New York<br />

Marchgl20<strong>11</strong><br />

1 39h%<br />

Nom J. Golub<br />

WElTZ dL LUXENBERG, P.C.<br />

Marshall Cohway Wright & Bradley, P.C.<br />

Attorneys for Plaintiffs<br />

Attorneys for Defendant Slant/Fin Corporation<br />

700 Broadway<br />

1 16 John Street, qth Floor<br />

New York, New York 10003<br />

New York, New York 10038<br />

(212) 558-5500 (212) 619-4444<br />

FILED


SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YOFX<br />

COUNTY OF NEW YORK<br />

TN RE: NEW YORK COUNTY<br />

NYCAL<br />

ASBESTOS LITIGATION<br />

I.A.S. Part 30<br />

(Heitler, J.)<br />

THIS DOCUMENT REFERS TO:<br />

Index No.: 190<strong>26</strong>9/10<br />

GLENN RITZEL,<br />

-against-<br />

A. C. & S., INC., et al.,<br />

Plaintiffs,<br />

Defendants.<br />

NO OPPOSITION<br />

SUMMARY JUDGMENT<br />

MOTION AND ORDER<br />

WHEREFORE, defendant, Kentile Floors, Inc., hereby requests summary judgment in<br />

the above entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules 6 3212, dismissing plaintiffs’<br />

complaint against defendant, Kentile Floors, Inc., with prejudice in this action, and there being<br />

no opposition thereto,<br />

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against<br />

defendant, Kentile Floors, Inc., be and the Same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and without<br />

costs.<br />

Dated: New Y rk, New York<br />

f-7 ,20<strong>11</strong><br />

Carol M. Tempesta, Esq.<br />

Attorney for Defendant<br />

Kentile Floors, Inc.<br />

Glenn Ritzel<br />

McGivNEY & UUGER, P.C.<br />

Weitz & Luxenberg, P.C.<br />

80 Broad Street-Suite 2300<br />

700 Broadway<br />

New York, New Y ork 100<strong>04</strong><br />

New York, New York 10003<br />

(212) 509-3456 (212) 558-5500<br />

SO ORDERED,<br />

2082-9815<br />

N0038955-1<br />

ApFi 1 5 20 <strong>11</strong>


SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK<br />

COUNTY OF NEW YORK<br />

IN RE: NEW YORK COUNTY<br />

i NYCAL<br />

ASBESTOS LITIGATION<br />

i 1,A.S. Part 30<br />

[ (Heitler, J.)<br />

THIS DOCUMENT REFERS TO:<br />

I j Index No.: 190<strong>26</strong>9<strong>11</strong>0<br />

GLENN RITZEL,<br />

"against-<br />

A. C. & S., INC., et al.,<br />

Plaintiffs,<br />

i NO OPPOSITION<br />

j SUMMARY JUDGMENT<br />

i MOTION AND ORDER<br />

Defendants. !<br />

WHEREFORE, defendant, The Fairbanks Company, hereby requests summary judgment<br />

in the above entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules 0 3212, dismissing<br />

plaintiffs' complaint against defendant, The Fairbanks Company, with prejudice in this action,<br />

and there being no opposition thereto,<br />

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against<br />

defendant, The Fairbanks Company, be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and<br />

without costs.<br />

Dated: New Yqrk, New York<br />

The Fairbanks Company<br />

MCGIVNEY & KLUGER, P.C.<br />

80 Broad Street-Suite 2300<br />

New York, New York 100<strong>04</strong><br />

(212) 509-3456<br />

n<br />

Glenn Ritzel<br />

Weitz & Luxenberg, P.C.<br />

700 Broadway<br />

New York, New York<br />

(21 2) 558-5500<br />

SO ORDERED, -<br />

Hon. Sherry KleiTHeitler<br />

5<strong>04</strong>-0659<br />

N0038955-1


SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK<br />

COUNTY OF NEW YORK<br />

IN RE: NEW YORK COUNTY<br />

NYCAL<br />

ASBESTOS LITIGATION<br />

I.A.S. Part 30<br />

(Heitler, J.)<br />

THIS DOCUMENT REFERS TO:<br />

Index No.: 190270/10<br />

JOSEPH MULLEN,<br />

-against-<br />

A. C. & S., INC., et al.,<br />

Plaintiffs,<br />

Defendants.<br />

NO OPPOSITION<br />

SUMMARY JUDGMENT<br />

MOTION AND ORDER<br />

WHEREFORE, defendant, Treadwell Corporation, hereby requests summary judgment in<br />

the above entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules 6 3212, dismissing plaintiffs'<br />

complaint against defendant, Treadwell Corporation, with prejudice in this action, and there<br />

being no opposition thereto,<br />

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against<br />

defendant, Treadwell Corporation, be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and<br />

without costs.<br />

Dated: New Y rk, New York<br />

73, ,20<strong>11</strong><br />

Attorney Michele J. for Mittlk'man, Defendant Esq.<br />

1Attorney for Plaintiffs<br />

Treadwell Corporation<br />

Joseph Mullen<br />

MCGIVNEY & KLUGER, P.C.<br />

Weitz & Luxenberg, P.C.<br />

80 Broad Street-Suite 2300 700 Broadway<br />

New York, New York 100<strong>04</strong><br />

New York, New York 10003 F\@<br />

(212) 509-3456 (212) 558-5500<br />

SO ORDERED,<br />

N0038955- 1<br />

123523379


I<br />

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK<br />

COUNTY OF NEW YORK<br />

IN RE: NEW YORK COUNTY j NYCAL<br />

ASBESTOS LITIGATION<br />

j I.A.S. Part 30<br />

(Heitler, J.)<br />

THIS DOCUMENT REFERS TO:<br />

j Index No.: 190270/10<br />

JOSEPH MULLEN,<br />

-against-<br />

A. C. & S., INC., el d.,<br />

Plaintiffs, / NO OPPOSITION<br />

! SUMMARY JUDGMENT<br />

j MOTION AND ORDER<br />

Defendants,<br />

WHEREFORE, defendant, Courter & Company, Inc., hereby requests<br />

judgment in the above entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules 5 3212,<br />

summary<br />

ismissing<br />

plaintiffs’ complaint against defendant, Courter & Company, Inc., with prejudice in this action,<br />

and there being no opposition thereto,<br />

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against<br />

defendant, Courter & Company, Inc., be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and<br />

without costs.<br />

Dated: New Y rk, New York<br />

qq ,20<strong>11</strong><br />

1Attorney for Plaintiffs<br />

Joseph Mullen<br />

MCGIVNEY & UUGER, P.C.<br />

Weitz & Luxenberg, P.C.<br />

80 Broad Street-Suite 2300<br />

700 Broadway<br />

New York, New Y ork 100<strong>04</strong><br />

New York, New York 100<br />

(212) 509-3456 (212) 558-5500<br />

N0038955-1


190270/10<br />

-against-<br />

Plaintiff(s),<br />

NO OPPOSITION<br />

SUMMARY JUDGMENT<br />

MOTION AND ORDER<br />

WHEREFORE, Defendant BWLP, Inc., hereby requests Summary Judgment in the aboveentitled<br />

case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Sections 3212, dismissing plaintiffs complaint<br />

against Defendant BW/IP, Inc., with prejudice, and there being no opposition thereto,<br />

OFtDERF,D, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against Defendant,<br />

BWIP, Inc., be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and without costs to either party.<br />

Dated: New Yo New York<br />

44%///<br />

'E.<br />

h~p, 2 6 ZQl'<br />

f Ai<br />

\.:1 l.",$SK<br />

I<br />

auPj<br />

OPPW<br />

Ted Eder, Esq.<br />

&-)UN ry CLERK'S<br />

SEGAL McCAMBRIDGE SINGER &<br />

Attorneys for Plaintiff<br />

MAHONEY, LTD.<br />

700 Broadway Attorneys for Defendant<br />

New York, NY 10003<br />

850 Third Avenue, Suite <strong>11</strong>00<br />

New York, New York 10022<br />

SO ORDERED,


SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK<br />

COUNTY OF NEW YORK<br />

IN RE: NEW YORK COUNTY i NYCAL<br />

ASBESTOS LITIGATION<br />

j I.A.S. Part 30<br />

! (Heitler, J.)<br />

THIS DOCUMENT REFERS TO:<br />

j Index No.: 190270/10<br />

JOSEPH MULLEN,<br />

-against-<br />

A. C. & S., INC., et al.,<br />

Plaintiffs,<br />

Defendants.<br />

i NO OPPOSITION<br />

SUMMARY JUDGMENT<br />

i MOTION AND ORDER<br />

WHEREFORE, defendant, The Fairbanks Company, hereby requests summary judgment<br />

in the above entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules 6 3212, dismissing<br />

plaintiffs’ complaint against defendant, The Fairbanks Company, with prejudice in this action,<br />

and there being no opposition thereto,<br />

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against<br />

defendant, The Fairbanks Company, be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and<br />

without costs.<br />

&i?k&<br />

Attorney for Defendant<br />

Attorney for Plaintiffs<br />

The Fairbanks Company<br />

Joseph Mullen<br />

MCGIVNEY & KI,UGER, P.C.<br />

Weitz & Luxenberg, P.C.<br />

80 Broad Street-Suite 2300 700 Broadway<br />

New York, New York 100<strong>04</strong> New Y ork, New Y ork 10003<br />

(212) 509-3456 (212) 558-5500<br />

5<strong>04</strong>-0658<br />

N0038955-1<br />

APR 15 20<strong>11</strong>


SIJPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK<br />

COUNTY OF NEW YORK<br />

IN RE NEW YORK CITY NYCAL<br />

ASBESTOS LITIGATION I.A.S. Part 30<br />

(Heitler, J.)<br />

x<br />

This Document Relates to: Index No. 190288/10<br />

X<br />

AARON RICHMAN<br />

X<br />

NO OPPOSITION<br />

SUMMARY JUDGMENT<br />

MOTION AND ORDER<br />

WHEREFORE, Defendant The Montalvo Corporation (sued herein as “Montalvo<br />

Corporation [The]” ) (hereinafter “Montalvo”) hereby requests summary judgment in the aboveentitled<br />

case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212, dismissing plaintiffs<br />

complaint against Montalvo with prejudice, and there being no opposition thereto,<br />

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross-claims against<br />

by dismissed with prejudice and without costs.<br />

546 Fifth Avenue, 4th Floor<br />

150 Broadway, Suite 600<br />

New York, New York 10036<br />

New York, New York 10038<br />

(212) 681-1575 (212) 791-0285<br />

D<br />

APR 15 20<strong>11</strong>


I<br />

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK<br />

COUNTY OF NEW YORK<br />

IN RE: NEW YORK COUNTY<br />

NYCAL<br />

ASBESTOS LITIGATION<br />

1,A.S. Part 30<br />

(Heitler, J.)<br />

THIS DOCUMENT REFERS TO:<br />

THOMAS THATER, AS EXECUTOR FOR THE<br />

ESTATE OF ROBERT THATER,<br />

-against-<br />

Plaintiffs,<br />

Index No.: 190297/10<br />

NO OPPOSITION<br />

SUMMARY JUDGMENT<br />

MOTION AND ORDER<br />

A. C. & S., INC., et al.,<br />

Defendants.<br />

WHEREFORE, defendant, Patterson Pump Co., hereby requests summary judgment in<br />

the above entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules 6 3212, dismissing plaintiffs'<br />

complaint against defendant, Patterson Pump Co., with prejudice in this action, and there being<br />

no opposition thereto,<br />

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against<br />

defendant, Patterson Pump Co., be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and without<br />

costs.<br />

Pi<br />

Attorney for Defendant<br />

Patterson Pump Co.<br />

Estate of Robert Thater<br />

MCGIVNEY & KLUGER, P.C.<br />

Weitz & Luxenberg, P.C.<br />

80 Broad Street-Suite 2300<br />

700 Broadway<br />

New York. New York 100<strong>04</strong><br />

(212) 509-3456 (212) 558-5500<br />

New York, New York 10003 ' -<br />

LpR 2 6 N'<br />

\<br />

SO ORDERED,<br />

N0038955-1<br />

Hon. Sherry Klein Heitler<br />

454-<strong>11</strong>953


SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK<br />

COUNTY OF NEW YORK<br />

IN RE: NEW YORK COUNTY<br />

! NYCAL<br />

ASBESTOS LITIGATION j I.A.S. Part 30<br />

j (Heitler, J.)<br />

THIS DOCUMENT REFERS TO:<br />

j Index No.: 190297/10<br />

THOMAS THATER, AS EXECUTOR FOR THE !<br />

ESTATE OF ROBERT THATER,<br />

i NO OPPOSITION<br />

Plaintiffs, i SUMMARY JUDGMENT<br />

MOTION AND ORDER<br />

-against-<br />

A. C. & S., INC., et al.,<br />

Defendants.<br />

i<br />

WHEREFORE, defendant, The Fairbanks Company, hereby requests summary judgment<br />

in the above entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules 5 3212, dismissing<br />

plaintiffs' complaint against defendant, The Fairbanks Company, with prejudice in this action,<br />

and there being no opposition thereto,<br />

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against<br />

defendant, The Fairbanks Company, be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and<br />

without costs.<br />

/-\<br />

Attorney for Defendant<br />

The Fairbanks Company<br />

MCGIVNEY & KLUGER, P.C.<br />

80 Broad Street-Suite 2300<br />

cw i4+ kps"7,Esp<br />

Attorney for Plaintiffs<br />

Estate of Robert Thater<br />

Weitz & Luxenberg, P.C.<br />

700 Broadway<br />

New York, New York I0003<br />

New York, New York 100<strong>04</strong><br />

(2 12) 509-3456 (212) 558-5500<br />

-.".",...<br />

y\pN ~o:KoFF\Go'<br />

LE@<br />

SO ORDERED, " c,ouN~<br />

Hon. Sherry Klein Heitler<br />

5<strong>04</strong>-0648<br />

N0038955-1<br />

D


SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK<br />

COUNTY OF NEW YORK<br />

IN RE: NEW YORK COUNTY<br />

NYCAL<br />

ASBESTOS LITIGATION<br />

I.A.S. Part 30<br />

(Heitler, J.)<br />

THIS DOCUMENT REFERS TO:<br />

THOMAS THATER, AS EXECUTOR FOR THE<br />

ESTATE OF ROBERT THATER,<br />

-against-<br />

A. C. & S., INC., et al.,<br />

Plaintiffs ,<br />

Defendants.<br />

Index No.: 190297/10<br />

NO OPPOSITION<br />

SUMMARY JUDGMENT<br />

MOTION AND ORDER<br />

WHEREFORE7 defendant, Aurora Pump Company, hereby requests summary judgment<br />

in the above entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules § 3212, dismissing<br />

plaintiffs' complaint against defendant, Aurora Pump Company, with prejudice in this action,<br />

and there being no opposition thereto,<br />

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against<br />

defendant, Aurora Pump Company, be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and<br />

without costs,<br />

d-<br />

Dated: New ork, New Y ork<br />

,20<strong>11</strong><br />

Attorney for Defendant<br />

Aurora Pump Company<br />

MCGJVNEY & KLUGER, P.C.<br />

80 Broad Street-Suite 2300<br />

k<br />

vf kL<br />

Attorney for Plaintiffs<br />

Estate of Robert Thater<br />

Weitz & Luxenberg, P.C.<br />

700 Broadway<br />

Fqq, uI/.<br />

FILED<br />

New York, New York 100<strong>04</strong> NewYork,NewYork 10003 APR 2 6 20<strong>11</strong><br />

(212) 509-3456 (212) 558-5500<br />

SO ORDERED,<br />

NEW YORK<br />

COUNTY CLERK'S OFFlCt<br />

1003-0392<br />

N0038955-1<br />

APR 13 20<strong>11</strong>


SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK<br />

COUNTY OF NEW YOFX<br />

TN RE: NEW YORK COUNTY<br />

NYCAL<br />

ASBESTOS LITIGATION<br />

I.A.S. Part 30<br />

(Heitler, J.)<br />

THIS DOCUMENT REFERS TO:<br />

Index No.: 190297/10<br />

ROBERT THATER,<br />

-against-<br />

A. C. & S., INC., et al.,<br />

Plaintiffs,<br />

Defendants.<br />

NO OPPOSITION<br />

SUMMARY JUDGMENT<br />

MOTION AND ORDER<br />

WHEREFORE, defendant, Saint-Gobain Abrasives, Inc., hereby requests summary<br />

judgment in the above entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules 6 32 12, dismissing<br />

plaintiffs’ complaint against defendant, Saint-Gobain Abrasives, Inc., with prejudice in this<br />

action, and there being no opposition thereto,<br />

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against<br />

defendant, Saint-Gobain Abrasives, Inc., be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice<br />

and without costs.<br />

Dated: New ork, New York<br />

$7 ,20<strong>11</strong><br />

Laura B. Hollman, Esqf<br />

Attorney for Defendant<br />

Saint-Gobain Abrasives, Inc.<br />

MCGIVNEY & KLUGER, P.C.<br />

80 Broad Street-Suite 2300<br />

New York, New York 100<strong>04</strong><br />

Attorney for Plaintiffs<br />

Estate of Robert Thater<br />

Weitz & Luxenberg, P.C.<br />

700 Broadway<br />

New York, New York 10003<br />

(212) 509-3456 (212) 558-5500<br />

SO ORDERED,<br />

2<strong>04</strong>7-47s<br />

N0038955-1


SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK<br />

COUNTY OF NEW YORK<br />

IN RE: NEW YORK COUNTY<br />

i NYCAL<br />

ASBESTOS LITIGATION<br />

j I.A.S. Part 30<br />

j (Heitler, J.)<br />

THIS DOCUMENT REFERS TO:<br />

i Index No.: 190297/10<br />

ROBERT THATER,<br />

-against-<br />

A. C. & S., INC., et al.,<br />

Plaintiffs, i NO OPPOSITION<br />

! SUMMARY JUDGMENT<br />

i MOTION AND ORDER<br />

Defendants.<br />

i<br />

WHEREFORE, defendant, Flowserve Corporation fWa The Duriron Company, Inc.,<br />

hereby requests summary judgment in the above entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law<br />

and Rules 0 3212, dismissing plaintiffs’ complaint against defendant, Flowserve Corporation<br />

fMa The Duriron Company, Inc., with prejudice in this action, and there being no opposition<br />

thereto,<br />

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against<br />

defendant, Flowserve Corporation fMa The Duriron Company, Inc., be and the same are hereby<br />

dismissed with prejudice and without costs.<br />

eachd6<br />

N. %JdJQq,<br />

ts$.<br />

Matthew T. Fairley, E@.<br />

Attorney for Defendant<br />

Attorney for Plaintiffs<br />

Flowserve Corporation<br />

Estate of Robert Thater<br />

MCGIVNEY & KLUGER, P.C.<br />

80 Broad Street-Suite 2300<br />

700 Broadway<br />

New York, New York 100<strong>04</strong><br />

New York, New York 10003<br />

(212) 509-3456 APR 2 6 20<strong>11</strong><br />

Weitz&Luenberg,~.F I L E D<br />

,.e<br />

SO ORDERED,<br />

NEW YORK<br />

COUNTY CLERK‘S OFFICE<br />

951-896<br />

N003895S-I<br />

APR 15 20<strong>11</strong>


I<br />

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK<br />

COUNTY OF NEW YOK<br />

IN RE: NEW YORK COUNTY<br />

! NYCAL<br />

ASBESTOS LITIGATION<br />

i I.A.S. Part 30<br />

! (Heitler, J.)<br />

THIS DOCUMENT REFERS TO:<br />

j Index No.: 190297/10<br />

THOMAS THATER, AS EXECUTOR FOR THE<br />

ESTATE OF ROBERT THATER,<br />

/ NO OPPOSITION<br />

Plaintiffs, i SUMMARY JUDGMENT<br />

/ MOTION AND ORDER<br />

-against-<br />

A. C. & S., INC., et al.,<br />

Defendants. !<br />

WHEREFORE, defendant, Falk Corporation, hereby requests summary judgment in the<br />

above entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules $ 3212, dismissing plaintif€s’<br />

complaint against defendant, Falk Corporation, with prejudice in this action, and there being no<br />

opposition thereto,<br />

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against<br />

defendant, Falk Corporation, be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and without<br />

costs.<br />

Dated: New York New York<br />

.rJl ,20<strong>11</strong><br />

Matthew T. Fairley, Esq.<br />

Attorney for Defendant<br />

Falk Corporation<br />

MCGWNEY & KLUGER, P.C.<br />

80 Broad Street-Suite 2300<br />

New York, New York 100<strong>04</strong><br />

C h k @- Rmcr, K ,<br />

Attorney for Plaintiffs ’-3<br />

Estate of Robert Thater<br />

WeitzaLuxenLrg, p.c. F 1 L E D<br />

700 Broadway<br />

New York, New York 10003<br />

(2 12) 509-3456 (2 12) 558-5500 APR 2 6 20”<br />

SO ORDERED,<br />

r4E-N Y QRK<br />

875-0068<br />

N0038955-1<br />

APR I520<strong>11</strong>


SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK<br />

COUNTY OF NEW YORK<br />

IN RE: NEW YORK COUNTY<br />

NYCAL<br />

ASBESTOS LITIGATION<br />

I.A.S. Part 30<br />

(Heitler, J.)<br />

THIS DOCUMENT REFERS TO:<br />

THOMAS THATER, AS EXECUTOR FOR THE<br />

ESTATE OF ROBERT THATER,<br />

Plaintiffs,<br />

-against-<br />

Index No.: 190297/10<br />

NO OPPOSITION<br />

SUMMARY JUDGMENT<br />

MOTION AND ORDER<br />

A. C. & S., INC., et al.,<br />

Defendants ,<br />

WHEREFORE, defendant, Saint-Gobain Abrasives, Inc., hereby requests summary<br />

judgment in the above entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules 8 3212, dismissing<br />

plaintiffs’ complaint against defendant, Saint-Gobain Abrasives, hc., with prejudice in this<br />

9 .*<br />

action, and there being no opposition thereto,<br />

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against<br />

defendant, Saint-Gobain Abrasives, Inc., be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice<br />

and without costs.<br />

Laura B. Hollman, Esq.’<br />

Attorney for Defendant<br />

Saint-Gobain Abrasives, Inc.<br />

MCGWNEY & KLUGER, P.C.<br />

80 Broad Street-Suite 2300<br />

New York, New York 100<strong>04</strong><br />

Attorney for Plaintiffs<br />

Estate of Robert Thater<br />

Weitz & Luxenberg, P.C.<br />

700 Broadway<br />

New Yark, New York 10003<br />

(212) 509-3456 (212) 558-5500<br />

FILED<br />

APR 2 6 20<strong>11</strong><br />

**e<br />

2<strong>04</strong>1415<br />

N0038955-1


!I<br />

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK<br />

COUNTY OF NEW YORK<br />

IN RE: NEW YORK COUNTY j NYCAL<br />

ASBESTOS LITIGATION<br />

j I.A.S. Part 30<br />

j (Heitler, J.)<br />

THIS DOCUMENT REFERS TO:<br />

i Index No.: 190297/10<br />

THOMAS THATER, AS EXECUTOR FOR THE i<br />

ESTATE OF ROBERT THATER,<br />

i NO OPPOSITION<br />

Plaintiffs, i SUMMARY JUDGMENT<br />

MOTION AND ORDER<br />

-against-<br />

A. C. & S., INC., et al.,<br />

Defendants.<br />

WHEREFORE, defendant, Flowserve Corporation fMa The Duriron Company, Inc.,<br />

hereby requests summary judgment in the above entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law<br />

and Rules 0 32 12, dismissing plaintiffs’ complaint against defendant, Flowserve Corporation<br />

fMa The Duriron Company, Inc., with prejudice in this action, and there being no opposition<br />

.,..<br />

thereto,<br />

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against<br />

defendant, Flowserve Corporation fMa The Duriron Company, Inc., be and the same are hereby<br />

dismissed with prejudice and without costs.<br />

Matthew T. Faid&, Esq.<br />

Attorney for Defendant<br />

Flowserve Corporation<br />

MCGlVNEY & KLUGER, P.C.<br />

80 Broad Street-Suite 2300<br />

Attorney for Plaintiffs<br />

Estate of Robert Thater<br />

Weitz & Luxenberg, P.C.<br />

700 Broadway<br />

New York. New York 100<strong>04</strong> n New York, New York 10003<br />

(212) 509-3456 (212) 558-5500<br />

FILED<br />

APR 2 6 20<strong>11</strong><br />

NEW YORK<br />

SO ORDERED,<br />

N0038955- I<br />

Hon. Sherry mein Heitler<br />

951-896


SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK<br />

COUNTY OF NEW YORK<br />

IN RE: NEW YORK CITY ASBESTOS LITIGATION<br />

This Document Relates To:<br />

THOMAS THATER, as Executor for the Estate of<br />

ROBERT THATER,<br />

Plaintiff( s),<br />

-against-<br />

AIR & LIQUID SYSTEMS CORPORATION, et al., :<br />

Defendants.<br />

A-<br />

:<br />

NYCAL<br />

I.A.S. Part 30<br />

(Hon. Sherry Klein Heitler)<br />

Index No.: 190297-10<br />

NO-OPPOSITION SUMMARY<br />

JUDGMENT MOTION AND<br />

ORDER<br />

WHEREFORE, defendant CRANE CO. hereby requests summary judgment in the<br />

above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212, dismissing<br />

plaintiffs' complaint against defendant CRANE CO. with prejudice, and there being no<br />

opposition thereto,<br />

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against<br />

defendant CRANE CO. be, and the same are hereby, dismissed with prejudice and Without costs.<br />

Attorneys for Plaintiff(s)<br />

700 Broadway CRANE CO. ApR 2 6 20''<br />

New York, NY 10003<br />

599 Lexington Avenue<br />

(212) 558-5500 New York, NY 10022 b:E,w yoM<br />

OFF\=*<br />

(212) 536-3900 , dry CLERKS<br />

t'X3L.E<br />

SO ORDERED,<br />

APR I5 20<strong>11</strong>


,&-<br />

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK<br />

COUNTY OF NEW YORK<br />

_________<strong>11</strong>_1_________________t_________-~---*-*----<br />

X<br />

IN RE: NEW YORK CITY : NYCAL<br />

ASBESTOS LITIGATION<br />

_________---_I”-_~-_f__________________”~---------------------------<br />

X<br />

This Document Relates To:<br />

: Index No. 19030U10<br />

DONALD B. SISSON and PATRICIA SISSON,<br />

-against-<br />

Plaintiff(s), : NO OPPOSITION<br />

: SUMMARY JUDGMENT<br />

: MOTION AND ORDER<br />

ARMSTRONG INTERNATIONAL, INC., et al.,<br />

Defendants.<br />

: Hon. Sherry Klein Heitler<br />

: IASPart39<br />

WHEREFORE, defendant Crown Cork & Seal USA, Inc. (“Crown”) hereby requests<br />

summary judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to CPLR 321 2, dismissing plaintiff‘s<br />

complaint against Crown with prejudice, and there being no opposition thereto, it is hereby:<br />

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against<br />

Crown be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and without costs.<br />

Dated: N w Yor ,NewYork<br />

3#/3+,/<br />

EARLY & STRAUSS L.L.C.<br />

Attorneys for Plaintiff<br />

FL,EMMING ZULACK WILLIAMSON ZAUDERER LLP<br />

n Cork & Seal USA, Inc.<br />

By: ~~<br />

ark Bibro, Esq,<br />

360 Lexington Avenue<br />

New York, New York 10017<br />

(212) 986-2233 (212) 412-9500<br />

360951/2<strong>11</strong>08


WHEREFORE, defendant CRANE CO. hereby requests summary judgment in the<br />

above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 32 12, dismissing<br />

i<br />

plaintiff's complaint against defendant CRANE CO. with prejudice, and there being no<br />

opposition thereto,<br />

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against<br />

defendant CRANE CO. be, and the same are hereby, dismissed with prejudice and without costs.<br />

700 Broadway<br />

New York, NY 10003<br />

(212) 558-5500<br />

SO ORDERED,


SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK<br />

COUNTY OF NEW YORK<br />

IN RE: NEW YORK COUNTY<br />

NYCAL<br />

ASBESTOS LITIGATION<br />

I.A.S. Part 30<br />

(Heitler, J.)<br />

THIS DOCUMENT REFERS TO:<br />

Index No.: 1903<strong>11</strong>/10<br />

ALVIN BICKEL AND MARIAN BICKEL,<br />

-against-<br />

A. C. & S., INC., et al.,<br />

Plaintiffs,<br />

Defendants.<br />

NO OPPOSITION<br />

SUMMARY JUDGMENT<br />

MOTION AND ORDER<br />

WHEREFORE, defendant, Patterson Pump Co., hereby requests summary judgment in<br />

the above entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules 0 3212, dismissing plaintiffs'<br />

complaint against defendant, Patterson Pump Co., with prejudice in this action, and there being<br />

no opposition thereto,<br />

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against<br />

defendant, Patterson Pump Co., be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and without<br />

costs.<br />

we<br />

Dated: Ne York, New York<br />

q77 ,20<strong>11</strong><br />

Attorney for Defendant<br />

Patterson Pump CO.<br />

MCGIVNEY & KLUGER, P.C.<br />

80 Broad Street-Suite 2300<br />

New York, New York 100<strong>04</strong><br />

(212) 509-3456<br />

Attorney for Plaintiffs<br />

Alvin Bickel and Marian Bickel @%+<br />

Weitz & Luxenberg, P.C. r,<br />

700 Broadway<br />

New York, New York 10003<br />

(212) 558-5500<br />

'- -&--'<br />

SO ORDERED,<br />

_*. ~"<br />

-w<br />

Hon. Sherry Kxn Heitler<br />

454-1 2019


SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK<br />

COUNTY OF NEW YORK<br />

IN RE: NEW YORK COUNTY<br />

i NYCAL<br />

ASBESTOS LITIGATION<br />

j I.A.S. Part 30<br />

j (Heitler, J.)<br />

THIS DOCUMENT REFERS TO:<br />

j Index No.: 190312/10<br />

DONALD JEFFERY AND CINDY JEFFERY,<br />

-against-<br />

A. C. & S., INC., et al.,<br />

Plaintiffs,<br />

Defendants.<br />

i NO OPPOSITION<br />

SUMMARY JUDGMENT<br />

i MOTION AND ORDER<br />

WHEREFORE, defendant, Patterson Pump Co., hereby requests summary judgment in<br />

the above entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules 5 3212, dismissing plaintiffs’<br />

complaint against defendant, Patterson Pump Co., with prejudice in this action, and there being<br />

no opposition thereto,<br />

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against<br />

defendant, Patterson Pump Co., be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and without<br />

costs.<br />

Dated: New Yojk, New York<br />

Attorney for Defendant<br />

Patterson Pump Co.<br />

MCGWNEY & KLUGER, P.C.<br />

80 Broad Street-Suite 2300<br />

New York, New York 100<strong>04</strong><br />

(212) 509-3456 (21 2) 558-5500<br />

Donald Jeffery and Cindy Jeffery<br />

Weitz & Luxenberg, P.C.<br />

700 Broadway<br />

New York, New York 10003<br />

* FILED i<br />

SO ORDERED, APR 2 6 20<strong>11</strong><br />

Hon. Sherry Klein Hkitler<br />

N0038955-1


SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK<br />

COUNTY OF NEW YORK<br />

IN RE: NEW YORK COUNTY<br />

i NYCAL<br />

ASBESTOS LITIGATION<br />

j I.A.S. Part 30<br />

i (Heitler, J.)<br />

THIS DOCUMENT REFERS TO:<br />

i Index No.: 190314/10<br />

ANGELINA VINTICINQUO AND VINCENT<br />

j<br />

VINTICINQUO,<br />

i NO OPPOSITION<br />

Plaintiffs, j SUMMARY JUDGMENT<br />

-against-<br />

A. C. & S., INC., et al.,<br />

j MOTION AND ORDER<br />

Defendants.<br />

I<br />

WHEREFORE7 defendant, Oakfabco, Inc., hereby requests summary judgment in the<br />

above entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules 6 3212, dismissing plaintiffs’<br />

complaint against defendant, Oakfabco, Inc., with prejudice in this action, and there being no<br />

opposition thereto,<br />

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against<br />

defendant, Oakfabco, Inc., be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and without<br />

costs.<br />

Robert Darish, Esq.<br />

Attorney for Defendant<br />

Oakfabco, Inc.<br />

MCGIVNEY & KLUGEK, P.C.<br />

80 Broad Street-Suite 2300<br />

New York, New York 100<strong>04</strong><br />

(212) 509-3456<br />

Angelina Vinticinquo and Vincent Vinticinquo<br />

Weitz & Luxenberg, P.C.<br />

700 Broadway<br />

New York, New York 10003<br />

FFICE~<br />

SO ORDERED,<br />

NO03895 5- 1<br />

APR 15 20<strong>11</strong><br />

2571-0674


-against-<br />

Plaintiff( s),<br />

NO OPPOSITION<br />

SUMMARY JUDGMENT<br />

MOTION AND ORDER<br />

WHEREFORE, Defendant BW/IP, Inc., hereby requests Summary Judgment in the aboveentitled<br />

case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Sections 3212, dismissing plaintiffs complaint<br />

against Defendant BW/IP, Inc., with prejudice, and there being no opposition thereto,<br />

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against Defendant,<br />

BW/P, Inc., be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and without costs to either party.<br />

Dated: New York, Ney Yo&<br />

SEGAL McCAMBRIDGE SINGER &<br />

Attorneys for Plaintiff<br />

MAHONEY, LTD.<br />

700 Broadway Attorneys for Defendant<br />

New York, NY 10003 850 Third Avenue, Suite <strong>11</strong>00<br />

New York, New York 10022<br />

SO ORDERED,


SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK<br />

COUNTY OF NEW YORK<br />

IN RE: NEW YORK COUNTY<br />

NYCAL<br />

ASBESTOS LITIGATION<br />

I.A.S. Part 30<br />

(Heitler, J.)<br />

THIS DOCUMENT REFERS TO:<br />

Index No.: 190315/10<br />

RICHARD FOLEY AND ANNA FOLEY,<br />

-against-<br />

A. C. & S., INC., et ul.,<br />

Plaintiffs,<br />

Defendants.<br />

NO OPPOSITION<br />

SUMMARY JUDGMENT<br />

MOTION AND ORDER<br />

WHEREFORE, defendant, The Fairbanks Company, hereby requests summary judgment<br />

in the above entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules 6 3212, dismissing<br />

plaintiffs' complaint against defendant, The Fairbanks Company, with prejudice in this action,<br />

and there being no opposition thereto,<br />

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against<br />

defendant, The Fairbanks Company, be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and<br />

without costs.<br />

Okwedeo N. Okoh, Esq.<br />

Attorney for Defendant<br />

The Fairbanks Company<br />

MCGIVNEY & KLUGER, P.C.<br />

80 Broad Street-Suite 2300<br />

Attorney for Plaintiffs<br />

Richard Foley and Anna Foley<br />

Weitz & Luxenberg, P.C.<br />

700 Broadway<br />

New York, New York 10003<br />

!<br />

New York, New York 100<strong>04</strong> FILED 1<br />

(212) 509-3456<br />

SO ORDEED,<br />

5<strong>04</strong>$@y~<br />

APR 2 6 20<strong>11</strong><br />

ww Y9WK<br />

i Y CLERK'S OFFICE'<br />

N0038955-1<br />

APR 16 40<strong>11</strong>


SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK<br />

. COWTY OF NEW YORK<br />

IN RE: NEW YORK COUNTY<br />

I NYCAL<br />

ASBESTOS LITIGATION<br />

I.A.S.Part30<br />

I<br />

,(Heitler, J.)<br />

THIS DOCUMENT REFERS TO:<br />

I<br />

i Index No.: 190323/10<br />

MANUEL A. CHINEA AND JANET M. CHINEA, I<br />

-against-<br />

Plainti ff(s),<br />

AMERICAN OPTICAL COMPANY, et al.,<br />

..<br />

-. . . - -- - -<br />

Defendant( . s)<br />

- -. . --<br />

I<br />

I<br />

I<br />

I<br />

i NO OPPOSITION<br />

SUMMARY JUDGMENT<br />

MOTION AND ORDER<br />

I<br />

I<br />

I -- - - .. . - -. - .<br />

WHEREFORE, defendant Sid Harvey Industries, Inc., hereby requests summary judgment<br />

in the above entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules 6 32 12, dismissing plaintiffs<br />

complaint against defendant, Sid Harvey Industries, Inc. with prejudice, and there being no<br />

opposition thereto,<br />

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and moss claims against<br />

defendant, Sid Harvey Industries, Inc., be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and<br />

without costs.<br />

I<br />

. . I<br />

I<br />

,!,.<br />

Dated: New York, New York<br />

ppd r)- ,20<strong>11</strong><br />

Robert Darish Esq.<br />

MCGIVNEY & KLUGER, P.C.<br />

Attorneys for Defendants<br />

r i a Ea&/<br />

EARLY & STRAUSS, L.L.C.<br />

Attorneys for Plaintiffs<br />

Sid Harvey Industries, Inc.<br />

Manuel A Chinea and Jan<br />

80 Broad Street - 23rd Floor<br />

360 Lexington Avenue, 20<br />

New York, New York 100<strong>04</strong><br />

New York, New York. 10017<br />

(212) 509-3456 (212) 986-2233 6 ~ 6 20;F'f ~ ~ 2<br />

SO ORDERED,<br />

_+^ * "<br />

Hon. Sherry Klein Heitler APR 1<br />

tqF.'!JV Yon%<br />

URNS OFF@;<br />

066477<br />

INOM2278- I }


NYCAL<br />

I.A.S. Part 30<br />

Hon. Sherry Klein Heitler, J.S.C.<br />

JAMES PALUMBO and CONCElTA PALUMBO,<br />

Index No.: 190329-2010<br />

-against-<br />

Plaintiffs,<br />

NO OPPOSITION SUMMARY JUDGMENT<br />

MOTION AND ORDER<br />

AMERICAN BILTRITE, INC., Individually and as Successor to<br />

Amtico Floors, et al. including,<br />

GATES CORPORATION,<br />

Defendants.<br />

WHEREFORE, defendant THE GATES CORPORATION, sued herein as GATES CORPORATION<br />

hereby request summary judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules<br />

Section 3212, dismissing plaintiff's complaint against defendant GATES with prejudice, and there being<br />

no opposition thereto,<br />

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against defendant<br />

THE GATES CORPORATION be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and without costs<br />

Sedgwick, Detert, Moran & Arnold, LLP<br />

Attorney for Plaint#fs<br />

Attorneys for The Gates Corporation<br />

700 Broadway Three Gateway Center,<br />

New York, New York 10003<br />

Newark, NJ 07102<br />

(212) 558-5500 (973) 242-0002<br />

SO ORDERED,


THEODORE DENARO and CARMELA DENARO, Index No.: 190331-2010<br />

BMCE INC. et al. including,<br />

GATES CORPORATION,<br />

-against-<br />

Plaintiffs,<br />

NO OPPOSITION SUMMARY JUDGMENT<br />

MOTION AND ORDER<br />

Defendants.<br />

WHEREFORE, defendant THE GATES CORPORATION, sued herein as GATES CORPORATION<br />

hereby request summary judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules<br />

Section 3212, dismissing plaintiffs complaint against defendant GATES with prejudice, and there being<br />

no opposition thereto,<br />

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against defendant<br />

THE GATES CORPORATION be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and without costs.<br />

(7\ -<br />

David A.h&&!f 1 . Dennis E. Vega, Esq.<br />

Weitz & Luxenberg, P.C.<br />

Sedgwick, Detert, Moran & Arnold, LLP<br />

Attorney for Plaintiffs<br />

Attorneys for The Gates Corporution<br />

700 Broadway<br />

Three Gateway Center,<br />

New York, New York 10003<br />

Newark, NJ 07102<br />

(212) 558-5500 (973) 242-0002<br />

SO ORDERED,


SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK<br />

COUNTY OF NEW YORK<br />

IN RE: NEW YORK COUNTY ASBESTOS<br />

LITIGATION<br />

This Document Relates to:<br />

WILFRED JOSEPH GOGEL and CATHERINE<br />

JOSEPHINE GOGEL,<br />

Index No.: 190332/10<br />

NO OPPOSITION SUMMARY<br />

JUDMENT MOTION AND<br />

ORDER 1<br />

V.<br />

Blwintiff(s),<br />

A.O. SMITH WATER PRODUCTS, et al.,<br />

Defendan t(s).<br />

-----______________"<strong>11</strong>__________________---*-------------------------<br />

WHEREFORE, defendant, MEEM MANUFACTURING COMPANY, hereby requests<br />

summary judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section<br />

32 12, dismissing plaintiffs complaint against defendant, NEEM MANUFACTURING<br />

COMPANY, with prejudice, and there being no opposition thereto.<br />

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against<br />

defendant, NEEM MANUFACTURING COMPANY, be and the same are hereby is<br />

&*Q<br />

bVR<br />

6 TQ'<br />

@$OFF\@<br />

UN-8 GLE<br />

Lisa M. Pascarella, Esq.<br />

Braaten & Pascarella, LLC<br />

AttorneyW Plaintiff(s)<br />

Attorneys for Defendant<br />

546 Fifth Ave, 4th Floor Rheem Manufacturing Company<br />

New York, NY 10036 2430 Route 34<br />

(212) 681-1575<br />

Manasquan, New Jersey 08736<br />

(732) 528-8888<br />

SO ORDERED,<br />

Honorable Sherry K. Heitler<br />

fl APR 1520<strong>11</strong>


NYCAL<br />

I.A.S, Part 30<br />

(Heitler, J.)<br />

This Document Relates To:<br />

NO OPPOSITION SUMMARY<br />

JUDGMENT MOTION AND<br />

ORDER<br />

Index No.: 190332-10<br />

WHEREFORE, defendant SEQUOIA VENTURES INC. f/Ma BECHTEL COW.,<br />

hereby requests summary judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and<br />

Rules Section 3212, dismissing plaintiff's complaint against defendant SEQUOIA VENTURES<br />

INC. f/k/a BECHTEL CORP., with prejudice, and there being no opposition thereto,<br />

OIRDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against<br />

defendant SEQUOIA VENTURES INC. fMa BECHTEL CORP., be and the same are hereby<br />

dismissed with prejudice and without costs.<br />

FILED<br />

APR 2 6 20<strong>11</strong><br />

LANDMAN CORSI BALLAIN co &rn%TtOFFICe.<br />

(212) 681-1575<br />

SEQUOIA VENTURES INC.<br />

fMa BECHTEL COW.<br />

120 Broadway, 27th Floor<br />

New York, New York 10271 -0079<br />

(212) 238-4800<br />

So Ordered:<br />

Hon. Sherry Klein Heitler<br />

,::ODMNPCDOCS/WOCSNYIS I4405/1


.._<br />

This Document Relates to:<br />

WILFRED JOSEPH GOGEL and CATHERINE<br />

JOSEPHINE GOGEL,<br />

V.<br />

Plaintiff(s),<br />

Index No.: 190332llO<br />

NO OPPOSITION<br />

SUMMARY<br />

JUDGMENT MOTION AND<br />

ORDER<br />

A.O. SMITH WATER PRODUCTS, et al.,<br />

Defendant(s).<br />

WHEREFORE, defendant, BIRD INCOWORATED hereby requests summary judgment in<br />

the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212, dismissing<br />

plaintiffs complaint against defendants, BIRD INCORPORATED with prejudice, and there being<br />

no opposition thereo,<br />

ORDERED, that<br />

notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against<br />

be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and<br />

New York, New York 10036<br />

(212) 681-1575<br />

PASCARELLA, LLC<br />

Attorney for Defendant<br />

BIRD INCORPORATED<br />

2430 Route 34, Suite A-18<br />

Manasquan, New Jersey 08736<br />

Judge Sherry Klein Heitler


~ ~~~<br />

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK<br />

COUNTY OF NEW YORK<br />

This Document Relates To:<br />

Index No.: 190332/10<br />

WILFRED JOSEPH GOGEL and CATHERINE<br />

JOSEPHINE GOGEL,<br />

V.<br />

Plaintiff(s),<br />

NO OPPOSITION<br />

SUMMARY<br />

JUDGMENT MOTION AND<br />

ORDER<br />

A.O. SMITH WATER PRODUCTS, et al.,<br />

Defendants.<br />

WHEREFORE, defendant, TRANE US INC. f/k/a AMERICAN STANDARD INC., hereby<br />

requests summary judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules<br />

Section 3212, dismissing plaintiffs complaint against defendants, TRANE US INC, f/Wa<br />

AMERICAN STANDARD INC., with prejudice, and there being no opposition thereo,<br />

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against<br />

defendant TRANE US INC. flWa AMERICAN STANDARD INC., be and the sape p<br />

dismissed wiArejudice and without costs.<br />

1<br />

.*aL<br />

-- 4 fb<br />

, r',<br />

New York, New York 10036<br />

(212) 681-1575<br />

Lisa M. Pascarella, Esq.<br />

BRAATEN & PASCARELLA, LLC<br />

Attorney for Defendant<br />

TRANE US INC. W a AMERICAN<br />

STANDARD INC.,<br />

2430 Route 34, Suite A- 18<br />

Manasquan, New Jersey 08736<br />

(732) 528-8888<br />

Judge Sherry Klein Heitler APR 15 20<strong>11</strong>


SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK<br />

COUNTY OF NEW YORK<br />

IN RE: NEW YORK COUNTY j NYCAL<br />

ASBESTOS LITIGATION<br />

j I.A.S. Part 30<br />

i (Heitler, J.)<br />

THIS DOCUMENT REFERS TO:<br />

j Index No.: 190335A 0<br />

SAM GALEN,<br />

A. C. & S., INC., el al.,<br />

Plaintiffs, i NO OPPOSITION<br />

j SUMMARY JUDGMENT<br />

-against- j MOTION AND ORDER<br />

Defendants. !<br />

WHEREFORE, defendant, Atwood & Morrill Co., Inc, hereby requests summary<br />

judgment in the above entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules 5 32 12, dismissing<br />

plaintiffs’ complaint against defendant, Atwood & Morrill Co., Inc, with prejudice in this action,<br />

and there being no opposition thereto,<br />

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against<br />

defendant, Atwood & Morrill Co., Inc, be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and<br />

without costs.<br />

Dated: New<br />

Yb<br />

ork, New York<br />

,20<strong>11</strong><br />

Laura B. Hollman, E&.<br />

Attorney for Defendant<br />

Atwood & Morrill Co., Inc<br />

MCGIVNEY & KLUGER, P.C.<br />

80 Broad Street-Suite 2300<br />

New York, New York 100<strong>04</strong><br />

(212) 509-3456<br />

Sam Galen<br />

Weitz & Luxenberg, P.C.<br />

700 Broadway<br />

New York, New York<br />

(212)558-5500 L E D ’<br />

SO ORDERED,<br />

Hon. Sherry Klein Heitler<br />

APR 2 6<br />

N0038955-1


SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK<br />

COUNTY OF NEW YORK<br />

IN RE: NEW YORK COUNTY<br />

ASBESTOS LITIGATION<br />

THIS DOCUMENT REFERS TO:<br />

SAM GALEN,<br />

A. C. & S., INC., et al.,<br />

: NYCAL<br />

j I.A.S. Part 30<br />

[ (Heitler, J.)<br />

j Index No.: 190335/10<br />

Plaintiffs, i NO OPPOSITION<br />

j SUMMARY JUDGMENT<br />

-against- j MOTION AND ORDER<br />

Defendants. :<br />

WHEREFORE, defendant, Treadwell Corporation, hereby requests summary judgment in<br />

the above entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules $ 321 2, dismissing plaintiffs'<br />

complaint against defendant, Treadwell Corporation, with prejudice in this action, and there<br />

being no opposition thereto,<br />

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against<br />

defendant, Treadwell Corporation, be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and<br />

without costs.<br />

Dated: New York New York<br />

4/7 ' ,20<strong>11</strong><br />

Michele J. MittleKan, Esq.<br />

Attorney for Defendant<br />

Treadwel I Corporation<br />

MCGIVNEY & KLUGER, P.C.<br />

80 Broad Street-Suite 2300<br />

New York, New York 100<strong>04</strong><br />

(2 12) 509-3456<br />

Cbks Y. Fe54~q E S ~<br />

Attorney for Plaintiffs<br />

Sam Galen<br />

Weitz & Luxenberg, P.C.<br />

700 Broadway cr*c<br />

NewYork,New York %bod L E D<br />

i<br />

(212) 558-5500<br />

N0038955- I


SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK<br />

COUNTY OF NEW YORK<br />

IN RE: NEW YORK COUNTY<br />

! NYCAL<br />

ASBESTOS LITIGATION<br />

j I.A.S. Part 30<br />

! (Heitler, J.)<br />

THIS DOCUMENT REFERS TO:<br />

j Index No.: 190335/10<br />

SAM GALEN,<br />

A. C. & S., INC., et al.,<br />

Plaintiffs, i NO OPPOSITION<br />

! SUMMARY JUDGMENT<br />

-against- j MOTION AND ORDER<br />

Defendants. !<br />

WHEREFORE, defendant, Courter & Company, Inc., hereby requests<br />

judgment in the above entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules § 3212, I<br />

summary<br />

ismissing<br />

plaintiffs' complaint against defendant, Courter & Company, Inc., with prejudice in this action,<br />

and there being no opposition thereto,<br />

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against<br />

defendant, Courter & Company, he., be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and<br />

without costs.<br />

MCGIVNEY & KLUGER, P.C.<br />

80 Broad Street-Suite 2300<br />

New York, New York 100<strong>04</strong><br />

New 700 Broadway<br />

(212) 509-3456 (212) 558-5500<br />

e3<br />

C h k -fly-- -- FQUS", E+.<br />

Attorney for Plaintiffs<br />

Sam Galen<br />

Weitz & Luxenberg, P.C.<br />

York, New York 1000 FILED<br />

APR 2 6 20<strong>11</strong><br />

SO ORDERED,<br />

N0038955-1<br />

Hon. Sherry Klein Heitler<br />

f'iE\pd YOaK<br />

COUNTY CLERK'S OFF~C@<br />

<strong>11</strong>22-23850<br />

APR 1520<strong>11</strong>


SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK<br />

COUNTY OF NEW YORK<br />

IN RE: NEW YORK COUNTY<br />

NYCAL<br />

ASBESTOS LITIGATION<br />

I.A.S. Part 30<br />

(Heitler, J.)<br />

THIS DOCUMENT REFERS TO:<br />

JOSEPH GEMELLARO AND CHRISTINE<br />

GEMELLARO,<br />

-against-<br />

A. C. & S., INC., et al.,<br />

Plaintiffs,<br />

Defendants.<br />

Index No.: 190336/10<br />

NO OPPOSITION<br />

SUMMARY JUDGMENT<br />

MOTION AND ORDER<br />

WHEREFORE7 defendant, Patterson Pump Co., hereby requests summary judgment in<br />

the above entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules 6 32 12, dismissing plaintiffs'<br />

complaint against defendant, Patterson Pump Co., with prejudice in this action, and there being<br />

no opposition thereto,<br />

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against<br />

defendant, Patterson Pump Co., be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and without<br />

costs.<br />

Dated: New York, New York<br />

417 ,20<strong>11</strong><br />

K e e n C@!, Esq.<br />

Attorney tor Defendant<br />

Patterson Pump Co.<br />

MCGIVNEY & KLUGER, P.C.<br />

80 Broad Street-Suite 2300<br />

New York, New York 100<strong>04</strong><br />

(212) . , 509-3456<br />

SO ORDERED,<br />

m /I/<br />

Hon. Sherry Klein HAtler<br />

Joseph Gemellaro and Christine Gemellaro<br />

Weitz & Luxenberg, P.C.<br />

700 Broadway<br />

New York, New Yg 1 AoL E 0<br />

(212) 558-5500<br />

NELV %3RK<br />

&EFKSOFFLcE)<br />

N003895S-1


SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YOKK<br />

COUNTY OF NEW YORK<br />

IN RE: NEW YORK COUNTY<br />

NYCAL<br />

ASBESTOS LITIGATION<br />

I.A.S. Part 30<br />

(Heitler, J.)<br />

THIS DOCUMENT REFERS TO:<br />

JOSEPH GEMELLARO AND CHRISTINE<br />

GEMELLARO,<br />

-against-<br />

A. C. & S., INC., et al.,<br />

Plaintiffs,<br />

Defendants.<br />

Index No.: 190336/10<br />

NO OPPOSITION<br />

SUMMARY JUDGMENT<br />

MOTION AND ORDER<br />

WHEREFORE, defendant, The Fairbanks Company, hereby requests summary judgment<br />

in the above entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules 6 3212, dismissing<br />

plaintiffs' complaint against defendant, The Fairbanks Company, with prejudice in this action,<br />

and there being no opposition thereto,<br />

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against<br />

defendant, The Fairbanks Company, be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and<br />

without costs.<br />

Dated: New Y,ork, New York<br />

I<br />

yb ,20<strong>11</strong><br />

I<br />

-9<br />

Okwedeo N. Okoh, Esq.<br />

Attornev for Defendant<br />

The FaGbanks Company<br />

Joseph Gernellaro and Christine Gemellaro<br />

MCCIVNEY & KLUGER, P.C.<br />

Weitz & Luxenberg, P.C.<br />

80 Broad Street-Suite<br />

c<br />

2300<br />

700 Broadway FILED<br />

New York, New York 100<strong>04</strong><br />

New York, New York 10003<br />

(212) 509-3456<br />

(212) 558-5500 APR 2 6 20<strong>11</strong><br />

NEW YORK<br />

SO ORDERED,<br />

COUNTY CLERKS OFFICE-<br />

Hon. Sherry Klein Heitler<br />

N0038955-1<br />

5<strong>04</strong>-0649


SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK<br />

COUNTY OF NEW YORK<br />

IN RE: NEW YORK COUNTY<br />

! NYCAL<br />

ASBESTOS LITIGATION<br />

j T.A.S. Part 30<br />

j (Heitler, J.)<br />

THIS DOCUMENT REFERS TO:<br />

j Index No.: 190337/10<br />

EDWARD C. KELLEY,<br />

A. C. & S., INC., et al.,<br />

Plaintiffs, i NO OPPOSITION<br />

! SUMMARY JUDGMENT<br />

-against- j MOTION AND ORDER<br />

Defendants. !<br />

WHEREFORE, defendant, The Fairbanks Company, hereby requests summary judgment<br />

in the above entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules 8 3212, dismissing<br />

plaintiffs’ complaint against defendant, The Fairbanks Company, with prejudice in this action,<br />

and there being no opposition thereto,<br />

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against<br />

defendant, The Fairbanks Company, be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and<br />

without costs.<br />

Okwedeo N. Okoh, Esq.<br />

Attorney for Defendant<br />

The Fairbanks Company<br />

Edward C. Kelley<br />

MCGIVNEY & KLUGER, P.C.<br />

Weitz & Luxenberg, P.C.<br />

80 Broad Street-Suite 2300<br />

700 Broadway<br />

New York, New York 100<strong>04</strong><br />

New York, New York 1000<br />

(212) 509-3456 (212) 558-5500<br />

@aih 2 6 20’<br />

SO ORDERED,<br />

Hon. Sherry Kle& Heitler<br />

5<strong>04</strong>-0654<br />

V\\E’d cIsRI(’s .ranK OFFIG@<br />

N0038955-1<br />

APR I 5 zow


SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YON<br />

COUNTY OF NEW YORK<br />

IN RE: NEW YORK COUNTY<br />

j NYCAL<br />

ASBESTOS LITIGATION<br />

j I.A.S. Part 30<br />

i (Heitler, J.)<br />

THIS DOCUMENT REFERS TO:<br />

i Index No.: 190337/10<br />

EDWARD C. KELLEY,<br />

-against-<br />

A. C. & S., INC., et al.,<br />

Plaintiffs,<br />

i NO OPPOSITION<br />

! SUMMARY JUDGMENT<br />

j MOTION AND ORDER<br />

Defendants. /<br />

WHEREFORE, defendant, Karnak Corporation, hereby requests summary judgment in !<br />

the above entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules § 3212, dismissing plaintiffs’<br />

complaint against defendant, Karnak Corporation, with prejudice in this action, and there being<br />

no opposition thereto,<br />

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against<br />

defendant, Karnak Corporation, be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and<br />

without costs.<br />

Attorney for Plaintiffs<br />

Karnak Corporation<br />

Edward C. Kelley<br />

MCGWNEY & KLUGER, P.C.<br />

Weitz & Luxenberg, P.C.<br />

80 Broad Street-Suite 2300<br />

700 Broadway<br />

New York, New York 100<strong>04</strong><br />

(212) 509-3456 (212) 558-5500<br />

New York,New York 10003 F 1 L E<br />

N0038955-1<br />

APR 18 96<strong>11</strong>


SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK<br />

COUNTY OF NEW YORK<br />

IN RE: NEW YORK COUNTY j NYCAL<br />

ASBESTOS LITIGATION<br />

j LAS, Part 30<br />

i (Heitler, J.)<br />

THIS DOCUMENT REFERS TO:<br />

j Index No.: 190337/10<br />

EDWARD C. KELLEY,<br />

A. C. & S., INC., et al.,<br />

Plaintiffs, / NO OPPOSITION<br />

! SUMMARY JUDGMENT<br />

-against- j MOTION AND ORDER<br />

Defendants. !<br />

WHEREFORE, defendant, Atwood & Morrill Co., Inc, hereby requests summary<br />

judgment in the above entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules 6 3212, dismissing<br />

plaintiffs' complaint against defendant, Atwood & Morrill Co., Inc, with prejudice in this action,<br />

and there being no opposition thereto,<br />

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against<br />

defendant, Atwood & Morrill Co., Inc, be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and<br />

without costs.<br />

Dated: New Yoyk, New York<br />

Laura B. Hollman, E&.<br />

Attorney for Defendant<br />

Atwood & Morrill Co., Inc<br />

MCGIVNEY & KLUGER, P.C.<br />

SO Broad Street-Suite 2300<br />

New York, New York 100<strong>04</strong><br />

(212) 509-3456<br />

Edward C. Kelley<br />

Weitz & ~uxenberg, P.C.<br />

700 Broadway<br />

New York, New York 1000<br />

Hon. Sherry Klein Heitler<br />

N003895S-1<br />

APR 15 20<strong>11</strong>


SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK<br />

COUNTY OF NEW YORK<br />

IN RE: NEW YORK COUNTY<br />

i NYCAL<br />

ASBESTOS LITIGATION<br />

I.A.S. Part 30<br />

(Heitler, J.)<br />

THIS DOCUMENT REFERS TO:<br />

Index No.: 190338/10<br />

ROSALIE GENNOSA AND JOSEPH<br />

GENNOSA,<br />

NO OPPOSITION<br />

Plaintiffs, SUMMARY JUDGMENT<br />

MOTION AND ORDER<br />

-against-<br />

A. C. & S., INC., et al.,<br />

Defendants. !<br />

WHEREFORE, defendant, Aurora Pump Company, hereby requests summary judgment<br />

in the above entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules $ 3212, dismissing<br />

plaintiffs’ complaint against defendant, Aurora Pump Company, with prejudice in this action,<br />

and there being no opposition thereto,<br />

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against<br />

defendant, Aurora Pump Company, be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and<br />

without costs.<br />

Dated: New York, New York<br />

“r/7 ,20<strong>11</strong><br />

Attorney c for hark%. Plaintiffs<br />

Aurora Pump Company Rosalie Gennosa and Josep Gennosa I<br />

MCGlVNEY & KLUGER, P.C.<br />

Weitz & Luxenberg, P.C.<br />

4-<br />

Fr>k%*D ’!<br />

80 Broad Street-Suite 2300 700 Broadway APR 2 6 20’’<br />

New York, New York 100<strong>04</strong><br />

New York, New York 10003<br />

(212) 509-3456 (212) 558-5500 NEW YORK<br />

CLERKIS OFFGE‘<br />

SO ORDERED, h<br />

N0038955-1<br />

Hon. Sherry Klein Heitler<br />

1003-4 16<br />

GoUNn


SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK<br />

COUNTY OF NEW YORK<br />

IN RE: NEW YORK COUNTY<br />

NYCAL<br />

ASBESTOS LITIGATION<br />

I.A.S. Part 30<br />

(Heitler, J.)<br />

THIS DOCUMENT REFERS TO:<br />

ROSALIE GENNOSA AND JOSEPH<br />

GENNOSA,<br />

-against-<br />

A. C. & S., INC., et al.,<br />

Plaintiffs,<br />

Defendants.<br />

Index No.: 190338/10<br />

NO OPPOSITION<br />

SUMMARY JUDGMENT<br />

MOTION AND ORDER<br />

WHEREFORE, defendant, Columbia Boiler, hereby requests summary judgment in the<br />

above entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules 8 3212, dismissing plaintiffs'<br />

complaint against defendant, Columbia Boiler, with prejudice in this action, and there being no<br />

opposition thereto,<br />

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against<br />

defendant, Columbia Boiler, be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and without<br />

costs.<br />

Dated: New Y rk, New York<br />

$7 ,20<strong>11</strong><br />

- - -<br />

Carol M. Tempesta, Esq.<br />

Attorney for Defendant<br />

Attorney for Plaintiffs<br />

Columbia Boiler<br />

Rosalie Gennosa and Josep<br />

MCGIVNEY & KLUGER, P.C.<br />

Weitz & Luxenberg, P.C.<br />

80 Broad Street-Suite 2300<br />

700 Broadway<br />

New York, New York 100<strong>04</strong><br />

New York, New York 10003<br />

(212) 509-3456 (212) 558-5500<br />

SO ORDERED,<br />

N0038955-1<br />

Hon. Shewy Klein Heitler<br />

kL kluw, E$%.<br />

2572-20<br />

APR 2 6 ""<br />

c%wJ<br />

pEVJ YOHK<br />

(-J~=RKS O ~ F d


SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK<br />

COUNTY OF NEW YORK<br />

IN RE: NEW YORK COUNTY<br />

i NYCAL<br />

ASBESTOS LITIGATION<br />

j I.A.S. Part 30<br />

j (Heitler, J.)<br />

THIS DOCUMENT REFERS TO:<br />

j Index No,: 190338/10<br />

ROSALIE GENNOSA AND JOSEPH<br />

GENNOSA,<br />

j NO OPPOSITION<br />

Plaintiffs, i SUMMARY JUDGMENT<br />

MOTION AND ORDER<br />

-against-<br />

A. C. & S., INC., et al.,<br />

Defendants.<br />

j<br />

WHEREFORE, defendant, Oakfabco, Inc., hereby requests summary judgment in the<br />

above entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules 6 3212, dismissing plaintiffs'<br />

complaint against defendant, Oakfabco, Inc., with prejudice in this action, and there being no<br />

opposition thereto,<br />

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against<br />

defendant, Oakfabco, Inc,, be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and without<br />

costs.<br />

Attorney for Defendant<br />

Oakfabco, Inc.<br />

Attorney for Plaintiffs<br />

Rosalie Gennosa and Joseph Gennosa<br />

MCGIVNEY & KLUGER, P.C.<br />

Weitz & Luxenberg, P.C.<br />

80 Broad Street-Suite 2300 700 Broadway r<br />

New York, New York 100<strong>04</strong><br />

New York, New York 10003<br />

(212) 509-3456<br />

.I (212) 558-5500 APR 2 6 20''<br />

SO ORDERED,<br />

N003895S-1<br />

Hon. Sherr-kin<br />

Heitler<br />

-.<br />

2571-0677<br />

I3


SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK<br />

COUNTY OF NEW YORK<br />

IN RE: NEW YORK COUNTY j NYCAL<br />

ASBESTOS LITIGATION<br />

j I.A.S. Part 30<br />

j (Heitler, J.)<br />

THIS DOCUMENT REFERS TO:<br />

ROSALIE GENNOSA AND JOSEPH<br />

GENNOSA,<br />

-against-<br />

A. C. & S., INC., et al.,<br />

Plaintiffs,<br />

Defendants. !<br />

j Index No.: 190338/10<br />

i NO OPPOSITION<br />

i SUMMARY JUDGMENT<br />

MOTION AND ORDER<br />

WHEREFORE, defendant, National Boiler Works, Inc,, hereby requests summary<br />

judgment in the above entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules 6 3212, dismissing<br />

plaintiffs’ complaint against defendant, National Boiler Works, Inc., with prejudice in this<br />

action, and there being no opposition thereto,<br />

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against<br />

defendant, National Boiler Works, Inc., be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and<br />

without costs.<br />

C 9Attorney for arks Plaintiffs<br />

M. rwm> EST<br />

National Boiler Works, Inc.<br />

Rosalie Gennosa and Joseph Gennosa<br />

MCGIVNEY & KLUGER, P.C.<br />

Weitz & Luxenberg, P.C.<br />

80 Broad Street-Suite 2300<br />

700 Broadway<br />

FILED<br />

New York, New York 100<strong>04</strong><br />

New York, New York 10003<br />

(212) 509-3456 (212) 558-5500<br />

1<br />

APR 2 6 20<strong>11</strong><br />

SO ORDERED,<br />

F.~ZW YORK<br />

Hon. Sherry Klein Heitler<br />

COUNTY CLERK‘S OFFICE’<br />

N0038955-1<br />

1801-0030


SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK<br />

COUNTY OF NEW YORK<br />

IN RE: NEW YORK COUNTY j NYCAL<br />

ASBESTOS LITIGATION<br />

I.A.S. Part 30<br />

i (Heitler, J.)<br />

THIS DOCUMENT EFERS TO:<br />

ROSALIE GENNOSA AND JOSEPH<br />

GENNOSA,<br />

-against-<br />

A. C. & S., INC., et al.,<br />

Plaintiffs,<br />

Index No.: 190338/10<br />

NO OPPOSITION<br />

SUMMARY JUDGMENT<br />

MOTION AND ORDER<br />

Defendants.<br />

j<br />

WHEREFORE, defendant, Courter & Company, Inc., hereby requests summary<br />

judgment in the above entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules 6 3212, dismissing<br />

plaintiffs' complaint against defendant, Courter & Company, Inc., with prejudice in this action,<br />

and there being no opposition thereto,<br />

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against<br />

defendant, Courter & Company, Inc., be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and<br />

without costs.<br />

Dated: New York, New York<br />

417 ,20<strong>11</strong><br />

CkfE M. Lp.S%, E.%.<br />

Attorney for Plaintiffs<br />

Rosalie Gennosa and Joseph Gennosa<br />

MCGIVNEY & KLUGER, P.C.<br />

Weitz & Luxenberg, P.C.<br />

SO Broad Street-Suite 2300<br />

700 Broadway<br />

New York, New York 100<strong>04</strong><br />

New York, New York 10<br />

(212) 509-3456 (212) 558-5500<br />

SO ORDERED, A<br />

Hon. Sherry Klein Heitler<br />

<strong>11</strong>223iiwP<br />

LpR 2 6


ROSALIE GENNOSA and JOSEPH<br />

GENNOSA,<br />

-against-<br />

Plaintiff( s),<br />

A.O. SMITH WATER PRODUCTS, et al.,<br />

: NYCAL<br />

: I.A.S. Part30<br />

: (Hon. Sherry Klein Heitler)<br />

: Index No.: 190338-10<br />

: NO-OPPOSITION SUMMARY<br />

: JUDGMENT MOTION AND ORDER<br />

and Crane Co., improperly sued as “PACIFIC VALVES, Individually and as a subsidiary of<br />

Crane Co.,” (hereinafter “CRANE CO.”), hereby requests summary judgment in the aboveentitled<br />

case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212, dismissing plaintiffs’<br />

complaint against defendant CRANE CO. with prejudice, and there being no opposition thereto,<br />

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against<br />

defendant CRANE CO. be, and the same are hereby, dismissed with prejudice and Without costs.<br />

Dated:<br />

a k<br />

Attorneys for Plaintiff(s)<br />

700 Broadway<br />

New York, NY 10003<br />

(212) 558-5500<br />

for Defendant<br />

ED<br />

APR 2 6 20<strong>11</strong><br />

SO ORDERED,<br />

NY-857883 vl


SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK<br />

COUNTY OF NEW YORK<br />

IN RE: NEW YORK COUNTY i NYCAL<br />

ASBESTOS LITIGATION<br />

j I.A,S, Part 30<br />

i (Heitler, J.)<br />

THIS DOCUMENT REFERS TO:<br />

JOSEPH GENNOSA AND ROSALIE<br />

GENNOSA,<br />

-against-<br />

A. C. & S., INC., et al.,<br />

Plaintiffs,<br />

Defendants. !<br />

i Index No.: 190340/10<br />

[ NO OPPOSITION<br />

! SUMMARY JUDGMENT<br />

i MOTION AND ORDER<br />

WHEREFORE, defendant, Columbia Boiler, hereby requests summary judgment in the<br />

above entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules 6 3212, dismissing plaintiffs'<br />

complaint against defendant, Columbia Boiler, with prejudice in this action, and there being no<br />

opposition thereto,<br />

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against<br />

defendant, Columbia Boiler, be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and without<br />

Dated: New York, New York<br />

41-1 7 201 1<br />

I<br />

Carol M. Tempesta, Esq.<br />

Attorney for Defendant<br />

Columbia Boiler<br />

MCGIVNEY & KLUGER, P.C.<br />

80 Broad Street-Suite 2300<br />

New York, New York 100<strong>04</strong><br />

(212) 509-3456<br />

SO ORDERED,<br />

chsrla M. ~3.<br />

Attorney for Plaintiffs<br />

Joseph Gennosa and Rosalie Gennosa<br />

Weitz & Luxenberg, P.C.<br />

700 Broadway<br />

New York, New York 100 FILED,<br />

(212) 558-5500<br />

,Q&NTY<br />

APR 2 6 20<strong>11</strong><br />

h'FW YBI-7.K<br />

CLERKS OFFICE'<br />

N0038955-1


SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK<br />

COUNTY OF NEW YORK<br />

IN RE: NEW YORK COUNTY<br />

! NYCAL<br />

ASBESTOS LITIGATION<br />

______<br />

THIS DOCUMENT REFERS TO:<br />

JOSEPH GENNOSA AND ROSALIE<br />

GENNOSA,<br />

-against-<br />

A. C. & S., INC., et al.,<br />

P1aint i ffs ,<br />

I.A.S. Part 30<br />

(Heitler, J.)<br />

Index No,: 190340/10<br />

NO OPPOSITION<br />

SUMMARY JUDGMENT<br />

MOTION AND ORDER<br />

Defendants.<br />

i<br />

WHEREFORE, defendant, Oakfabco, Inc., hereby requests summary judgment in the<br />

above entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules 6 3212, dismissing plaintiffs'<br />

complaint against defendant, Oakfabco, Inc., with prejudice in this action, and there being no<br />

opposition thereto,<br />

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against<br />

defendant, Oakfabco, Inc., be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and without<br />

costs.<br />

Dated: New York, New York<br />

Chk V.<br />

Attorney for Defendant<br />

Oakfabco, Inc.<br />

MCGIVNEY & KLUGER, P.C.<br />

80 Broad Street-Suite 2300<br />

New York, New York 100<strong>04</strong><br />

(212) 509-3456 (212) 558-5500<br />

SO ORDERED,<br />

N0038955-1<br />

Won. Sherry Klein Heitler<br />

Fe+t~m, E%*<br />

Attorney for Plaintiffs<br />

Joseph Gennosa and Rosalie Gennosa<br />

Weitz & Luxenberg, P.C.<br />

700 Broadway<br />

New York, New York 10 EILED<br />

APR 2 6 20<strong>11</strong><br />

hJFllV YORK<br />

ra~bk~ CLERK'S OFFICE'


SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK<br />

COUNTY OF NEW YORK<br />

IN RE: NEW YORK COUNTY j NYCAL<br />

ASBESTOS LITIGATION<br />

j I.A.S. Part 30<br />

i (Heitler, J.)<br />

THIS DOCUMENT REFERS TO:<br />

j Index No.: 190340/10<br />

JOSEPH GENNOSA AND ROSALIE<br />

GENNOSA,<br />

i NO OPPOSITION<br />

Plaintiffs, j SUMMARY JUDGMENT<br />

i MOTION AND ORDER<br />

-against-<br />

A. C. & S., INC., et al.,<br />

Defendants.<br />

j<br />

WHEREFORE, defendant, National Boiler Works, Inc., hereby requests summary<br />

judgment in the above entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules 6 3212, dismissing<br />

plaintiffs’ complaint against defendant, National Boiler Works, Inc., with prejudice in this<br />

action, and there being no opposition thereto,<br />

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against<br />

defendant, National Boiler Works, Inc., be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and<br />

without costs.<br />

Dated: New,York, New York<br />

917 ,20<strong>11</strong><br />

Attorney for Defendant I<br />

National Boiler Works, Inc.<br />

MCGIVNEY & KLUGER, P.C.<br />

80 Broad Street-Suite 2300<br />

New York, New York 100<strong>04</strong><br />

(212) 509-3456 (212) 558-5500 1<br />

Attorney for Plaintiffs<br />

Joseph Gennosa and Rosalie Gennosa<br />

Weitz & Luxenberg, P.C.<br />

700 Broadway<br />

New York, New York 10003 F I L E D<br />

‘<br />

t<br />

SO ORDERED,<br />

N0038955-1<br />

4pR 2 6 20<strong>11</strong><br />

Ff/c~’


SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK<br />

COUNTY OF NEW YORK<br />

IN RE: NEW YOFX COUNTY j NYCAL<br />

ASBESTOS LITIGATION<br />

j I.A.S. Part 30<br />

i (Heitler, J.)<br />

THIS DOCUMENT REFERS TO:<br />

j Index No.: 190340/10<br />

JOSEPH GENNOSA AND ROSALIE<br />

GENNOSA,<br />

i NO OPPOSITION<br />

Plaintiffs, j SUMMARY JUDGMENT<br />

i MOTION AND ORDER<br />

-against-<br />

A. C. & S., INC., et al.,<br />

Defendants.<br />

j<br />

WHEREFORE, defendant, Courter & Company, Inc., hereby requests summary<br />

judgment in the above entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules 0 3212, dismissing<br />

plaintiffs' complaint against defendant, Courter & Company, Inc., with prejudice in this action,<br />

and there being no opposition thereto,<br />

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against<br />

defendant, Courter & Company, Inc., be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and<br />

without costs.<br />

\<br />

Attorney<br />

c for G fPlaintiffs<br />

k M.<br />

Joseph Gennosa and Rosalie Gennosa<br />

Weitz & Luxenberg, P.C.<br />

80 Broad Street-Suite 2300 700 Broadway B1"t:<br />

New York, New York 100<strong>04</strong><br />

New York, New York<br />

(212) 509-3456 (212) 558-5500<br />

A@!'*2 6 20<strong>11</strong><br />

SO ORDERED,<br />

4! YORK<br />

Hon. Sherry Klein Heitler C ERKS OFFICE:'<br />

N0038955-1<br />

APR 1320<strong>11</strong>


SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK<br />

COUNTY OF NEW YORK<br />

IN RE: NEW YORK COUNTY<br />

ASBESTOS LITIGATION<br />

! NYCAL<br />

j I.A.S. Part 30<br />

i (Heitler, J.)<br />

THIS DOCUMENT REFERS TO:<br />

i Index No,: 190340/10<br />

JOSEPH GENNOSA AND ROSALIE<br />

GENNOSA,<br />

i NO OPPOSITION<br />

Plaintiffs, j SUMMARY JUDGMENT<br />

i MOTION AND ORDER<br />

-against-<br />

A. C. & S., NC., et al.,<br />

Defendants.<br />

j<br />

WHEREFORE, defendant, Aurora Pump Company, hereby requests summary judgment<br />

in the above entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules 6 3212, dismissing<br />

plaintiffs’ complaint against defendant, Aurora Pump Company, with prejudice in this action,<br />

and there being no opposition thereto,<br />

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against<br />

defendant, Aurora Pump Company, be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and<br />

without costs.<br />

Dated: New York, New York<br />

,20<strong>11</strong><br />

Attorney for Plaintiffs<br />

Aurora Pump Company<br />

Joseph Gennosa and Rosalie Gennosa<br />

MCGIVNEY & KLTJGER, P.C.<br />

Weitz & Luxenberg, P.C.<br />

80 Broad Street-Suite 2300<br />

700 Broadway<br />

New York, New York 100<strong>04</strong><br />

New York, New York 10 3<br />

(212) 509-3456 (212) 558-5500<br />

ARR 2 6 20<strong>11</strong><br />

FILED<br />

SO ORDERED,<br />

Hon. Sherrywn Heitler<br />

b!EW YORK<br />

CLERK’S OFFtE’<br />

N0038955-1<br />

APR 1520<strong>11</strong>


SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK<br />

COUNTY OF NEW YORK<br />

IN RE: NEW YORK COUNTY j NYCAL<br />

ASBESTOS LITIGATION<br />

i I.A.S. Part 30<br />

! (Heitler, J.)<br />

THIS DOCUMENT REFERS TO:<br />

JAMES A. HAZELL AND STEFAN1 HAZELL,<br />

j Index No.: 190341/10<br />

!<br />

-against-<br />

Plaintiffs, i NO OPPOSITION<br />

j SUMMARY JUDGMENT<br />

[ MOTION AND ORDER<br />

A. C. & S., INC., et al.,<br />

Defendants. !<br />

WHEREFORE, defendant, Kentile Floors, Inc., hereby requests summary judgment in<br />

the above entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules 0 3212, dismissing plaintiffs’<br />

complaint against defendant, Kentile Floors, Inc., with prejudice in this action, and there being<br />

no opposition thereto,<br />

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against<br />

defendant, Kentile Floors, Inc., be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and without<br />

costs.<br />

c<br />

Carol M. Tempesta, Esq.<br />

Attorney for Defendant<br />

Kentile Floors, Inc.<br />

MCGIVNEY & KLUGER, P.C.<br />

80 Broad Street-Suite 2300<br />

New York, New York 100<strong>04</strong><br />

(2 12) 509-3456 (212) 558-5500<br />

James A. Hazell and Stefani Hazell<br />

Weitz & Luxenberg, P.C.<br />

700 Broadway<br />

New York, New York 10003<br />

N0038955-1


SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK<br />

COUNTY OF NEW YORK<br />

IN RE: NEW YORK CITY ASBESTOS LITIGATION<br />

__-"_frll_______----_--------------------"-------"-~~-------------<br />

This Document Relates To:<br />

: NYCAL<br />

JAMES A. HAZELL and STEFAN1 HAZELL, : I.A.S. Part 30<br />

: (Hon. Sherry Klein Heitler)<br />

Plaintiff(s),<br />

: IndexNo.: 190341-10<br />

-against-<br />

: NO-OPPOSITION SUMMARY<br />

CBS CORPORATION, et al.,<br />

: JUDGMENT MOTION AND<br />

: ORDER<br />

Defendants.<br />

X<br />

WHEREFORE, defendant CRANE CO. hereby requests summary judgment in the<br />

above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212, dismissing<br />

I<br />

plaintiffs' complaint against defendant CRANE CO. with prejudice, and there being no<br />

opposition thereto,<br />

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against<br />

defendant CRANE CO. be, and the same are hereby, dismissed with prejudice and without costs<br />

@*; 2: 6 2@It<br />

700 Broadway<br />

CRANE CO.<br />

New York, NY 10003<br />

599 Lexington Avenue<br />

YOBK Of F d<br />

(212) 558-5500 New York, NY 10022 &WS<br />

(212) 536-3900<br />

.-<br />

SO ORDERED,


SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK<br />

COUNTY OF NEW YORK<br />

IN RE: NEW YORK COUNTY j NYCAL<br />

ASBESTOS LITIGATION<br />

j I.A.S. Part 30<br />

: (Heitler, J.)<br />

THIS DOCUMENT REFERS TO:<br />

BERNARD D'AQUILA AND MARY ANN<br />

D'AQUILA,<br />

-against-<br />

A. C. & S., INC., el al.,<br />

Plaintiffs,<br />

j Index No.: 190343/10<br />

i NO OPPOSITION<br />

! SUMMARY JUDGMENT<br />

j MOTION AND ORDER<br />

Defendants.<br />

j<br />

WHEREFORE, defendant, Treadwell Corporation, hereby requests summary judgment in<br />

the above entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules 0 3212, dismissing plaintiffs'<br />

complaint against defendant, Treadwell Corporation, with prejudice in this action, and there<br />

being no opposition thereto,<br />

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against<br />

defendant, Treadwell Corporation, be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and<br />

without costs.<br />

Dated: New Nork. New York<br />

q7 ' ,20<strong>11</strong><br />

Michele J. MittlernLn, Esq.<br />

Attorney for Defendant<br />

Treadwell Corporation<br />

MCGIVNEY & KLUGER, P.C.<br />

80 Broad Street-Suite 2300<br />

New York, New York 100<strong>04</strong><br />

(212) 509-3456<br />

700 Broadway<br />

New York, New York 10003 @ 2<br />

SO ORDERED,<br />

1235-23412<br />

N0038955-1<br />

APR 15 20<strong>11</strong>


SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK<br />

COUNTY OF NEW YORK<br />

IN RE: NEW YORK COUNTY<br />

! NYCAL<br />

ASBESTOS LITIGATION<br />

j I.A.S. Part 30<br />

i (Heitler, J.)<br />

THIS DOCUMENT REFERS TO:<br />

j Index No.: 190343/10<br />

BERNARD D'AQUILA AND MARY ANN<br />

D'AQUILA,<br />

i NO OPPOSITION<br />

Plaintiffs, i SUMMARY JUDGMENT<br />

-againstj<br />

MOTION AND ORDER<br />

A. C. & S., INC., et al.,<br />

Defendants.<br />

j<br />

WHEREFORE, defendant, Courter & Company, Inc., hereby requests summary<br />

judgment in the above entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules 8 3212, dismissing<br />

plaintiffs' complaint against defendant, Courter & Company, Inc., with prejudice in this action,<br />

and there being no opposition thereto,<br />

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against<br />

defendant, Courter & Company, Inc., be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and<br />

without costs.<br />

Dated: New ork, New York<br />

rh ,20<strong>11</strong><br />

pn:m;c.-<br />

Chfk H.-FeguSDn,E&t.<br />

@tomey for Attorney for Plaintiffs<br />

ourter & Co<br />

Bernard DAquila and<br />

MCGIVNEY & UGER, P.C. Weitz & Luxenberg, P.C.<br />

80 Broad Street-Suite 2300<br />

700 Broadway<br />

New York, New York I00<strong>04</strong><br />

New York, New York 10003<br />

(212) 509-3456 (212) 558-5500<br />

SO ORDERED,<br />

of e<br />

<strong>11</strong>22-23791<br />

N003895S-1


SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK<br />

COUNTY OF NEW YORK<br />

IN RE: NEW YORK COUNTY i NYCAL<br />

ASBESTOS LITIGATION<br />

j I.A.S. Part 30<br />

! (Heitler, J.)<br />

THIS DOCUMENT REFERS TO:<br />

j Index No.: 190344/10<br />

RONALD HANZE AND CAROL HANZE,<br />

Plaintiffs, / NO OPPOSITION<br />

i SUMMARY JUDGMENT<br />

-against- / MOTION AND ORDER<br />

A. C. & S., mC., et d.,<br />


SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK<br />

COUNTY OF NEW YON<br />

IN RE: NEW YORK COUNTY j NYCAL<br />

ASBESTOS LITIGATION<br />

j I.A.S. Part 30<br />

i (Heitler, J.)<br />

THIS DOCUMENT REFERS TO:<br />

j Index No.: 190351/10<br />

ANTHONY CORINO AND ANTOINETTE<br />

CORINO,<br />

i NO OPPOSITION<br />

Plaintiffs, j SUMMARY JUDGMENT<br />

j MOTION AND ORDER<br />

-against-<br />

A. C. & S., INC., et al.,<br />

Defendants.<br />

j<br />

WHEREFORE, defendant, Oakfabco, Inc., hereby requests summary judgment in the<br />

above entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules 5 3212, dismissing plaintiffs’<br />

complaint against defendant, Oakfabco, Inc., with prejudice in this action, and there being no<br />

opposition thereto,<br />

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against<br />

defendant, Oakfabco, Inc., be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and without<br />

costs.<br />

- - E;+-.<br />

R&ert Darish, Esq. qw, -5<br />

Attorney for Defendant<br />

Oakfabco, Inc.<br />

MCGIVNEY & KLUGER, P.C.<br />

SO Broad Street-Suite 2300<br />

New York, New York 100<strong>04</strong><br />

(212) 509-3456<br />

vE”z€<br />

Attorney for Plaintiffs<br />

Anthony Corino and Antoi<br />

Weitz & Luxenberg, P.C. D<br />

700 Broadway<br />

New York, New York 10003<br />

ApR 2 6 lo”<br />

SO ORDERED,<br />

NEW YORK<br />

CLERKS OFF‘€<br />

couNn<br />

N003895S-1


SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK<br />

COUNTY OF NEW YORK<br />

IN RE: NEW YORK COUNTY j NYCAL<br />

ASBESTOS LITIGATION<br />

j I.A.S. Part 30<br />

i (Heitler, J.)<br />

THIS DOCUMENT REFERS TO:<br />

j Index No.: 190357/10<br />

GIULIO LOCCISANO,<br />

-against-<br />

A. C, & S,, INC, et al.,<br />

Plaintiffs,<br />

Defendants.<br />

i NO OPPOSITION<br />

SUMMARY JUDGMENT<br />

i MOTION AND ORDER<br />

WHEREFORE, defendant, Kentile Floors, Inc., hereby requests summary judgment in<br />

the above entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules 6 3212, dismissing plaintiffs'<br />

complaint against defendant, Kentile Floors, Inc., with prejudice in this action, and there being<br />

no opposition thereto,<br />

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against<br />

defendant, Kentile Floors, Inc., be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and without<br />

costs.<br />

Dated: New York New York<br />

41; ,20<strong>11</strong><br />

-\<br />

Carol M. Ternpesta, Esq.<br />

Attorney for Defendant<br />

Kentile Floors, Inc.<br />

MCGWY & KLUGER, P.C.<br />

80 Broad Street-Suite 2300<br />

New York, New York 100<strong>04</strong><br />

(212) 509-3456<br />

Ch/es-t+<br />

kp,, ,b$.<br />

Attorney for Plaintiffs<br />

Giulio Loccisano<br />

Weitz & Luxenberg, P.C.<br />

700 Broadway<br />

New York, New York 10003 FILED<br />

(212) 558-5500<br />

APR 2 6 20<strong>11</strong><br />

SO ORDERED,<br />

N0038955-1<br />

Hon. Sherry Klein Heitler<br />

2082-10351<br />

biFW YORK<br />

COUNTY CLERKS OFFICE'


SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK<br />

COUNTY OF NEW YORK<br />

IN RE: NEW YORK COUNTY<br />

NYCAL<br />

ASBESTOS LITIGATION<br />

1,A.S. Part 30<br />

(Heitler, J.)<br />

THIS DOCUMENT REFERS TO:<br />

Index No.: 190357/10<br />

GIULIO LOCCISANO,<br />

-against-<br />

A. C. & S., INC., et al.,<br />

Plaintiffs,<br />

Defendants.<br />

NO OPPOSITION<br />

SUMMARY JUDGMENT<br />

MOTION AND ORDER<br />

WHEREFORE, defendant, Patterson Pump Co., hereby requests summary judgment in<br />

the above entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules 6 3212, dismissing plaintiffs’<br />

complaint against defendant, Patterson Pump Co., with prejudice in this action, and there being<br />

no opposition thereto,<br />

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against<br />

defendant, Patterson Pump Co., be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and without<br />

costs.<br />

Dated: New York New York<br />

4<strong>11</strong>’ ,20<strong>11</strong> I.<br />

Patterson Pump Co.<br />

MCGIVNEY & KLUGER, P.C.<br />

80 Broad Street-Suite 2300<br />

New York, New York 100<strong>04</strong><br />

(212) 509-3456<br />

Giulio Loccisano<br />

Weitz & Luxenberg, P.C.<br />

700 Broadway<br />

New York, New York 10003<br />

(212) 558-5500<br />

SO ORDERED,<br />

N0038955-1<br />

Hon. Sherry Klein Heitler<br />

454-12065


SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK<br />

COUNTY OF NEW YORK<br />

IN RE: NEW YORK COUNTY j NYCAL<br />

ASBESTOS LITIGATION<br />

j I.A.S. Part 30<br />

! (Heitler, J.)<br />

THIS DOCUMENT REFERS TO:<br />

i Index No.: 190357/10<br />

GIULIO LOCCISANO,<br />

A. C. & S., INC., et al.,<br />

Plaintiffs, i NO OPPOSITION<br />

j SUMMARY JUDGMENT<br />

-against- j MOTION AND ORDER<br />

Defendants. !<br />

WHEREFORE, defendant, The Fairbanks Company, hereby requests summary judgment<br />

in the above entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules 6 3212, dismissing<br />

plaintiffs' complaint against defendant, The Fairbanks Company, with prejudice in this action,<br />

and there being no opposition thereto,<br />

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against<br />

defendant, The Fairbanks Company, be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and<br />

without costs.<br />

Dated: New York, New York<br />

417 ,20<strong>11</strong><br />

OkGedeo Attorney for N. Defendant Okoh, Esq.<br />

The Fairbanks Company<br />

MCGIVNEY & KLUGER, P.C.<br />

80 Broad Street-Suite 2300<br />

New York, New York 100<strong>04</strong><br />

(212) 509-3456<br />

1Attorney for Plaintiffs<br />

Giulio Loccisano<br />

Weitz & Luxenberg, P.C.<br />

700 Broadway<br />

New York, New York 100<br />

(212) 558-5500<br />

I<br />

SO ORDERED, - -<br />

Hon. Sherry Klein Heitler<br />

N0038955-1


SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK<br />

COUNTY OF NEW YORK<br />

IN RE: NEW YORK COUNTY<br />

j NYCAL<br />

ASBESTOS LITIGATION<br />

j I.A.S. Part 30<br />

j (Heitler, J.)<br />

THIS DOCUMENT REFERS TO:<br />

j Index No.: 190358/10<br />

ARTHUR J, MEDIATE AND HARRIET<br />

MEDIATE,<br />

i NO OPPOSITION<br />

Plaintiffs, j SUMMARY JUDGMENT<br />

MOTION AND ORDER<br />

-against-<br />

A. C. & S., INC., et al.,<br />

Defendants.<br />

j<br />

WHEREFORE, defendant, Tishman Liquidating Corp., hereby requests summary<br />

judgment in the above entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules 5 3212, dismissing<br />

plaintiffs’ complaint against defendant, Tishman Liquidating Corp., with prejudice in this action,<br />

and there being no opposition thereto,<br />

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against<br />

defendant, Tishman Liquidating Corp., be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and<br />

without costs.<br />

Dated: New York, New York<br />

r/7 ,20<strong>11</strong><br />

MCGIVNEY & KLUGER, P.C.<br />

80 Broad Street-Suite 2300<br />

New York, New York 100<strong>04</strong><br />

(212) 509-3456<br />

n<br />

e<br />

dmh rZ. %o.l, E+.<br />

dmh rZ. %o.l, E+.<br />

Attorney for Plaintiffs<br />

Arthur J. Mediate and Harriet Mediate<br />

Weitz & Luxenberg, P.C.<br />

700 Broadway<br />

New York, New York 1000<br />

(212) 558-5500<br />

APR 2 6 20<strong>11</strong><br />

N0038955-1


I<br />

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK<br />

COUNTY OF NEW YORK<br />

IN RE: NEW YORK COUNTY j NYCAL<br />

ASBESTOS LITIGATION<br />

j I.A.S. Part 30<br />

! (Heitler, J.)<br />

THIS DOCUMENT REFERS TO:<br />

ARTHUR J. MEDIATE AND HARRIET<br />

MEDIATE,<br />

-against-<br />

A. C. & S., INC., et al.,<br />

Plaintiffs,<br />

j Index No.: 190358/10<br />

i NO OPPOSITION<br />

! SUMMARY JUDGMENT<br />

j MOTION AND ORDER<br />

Defendants,<br />

i<br />

WHEREFORE, defendant, Safeguard Industrial Equipment Co., hereby requests<br />

summary judgment in the above entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules 6 3212,<br />

dismissing plaintiffs’ complaint against defendant, Safeguard Industrial Equipment Co,, with<br />

prejudice in this action, and there being no opposition thereto,<br />

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against<br />

defendant, Safeguard Industrial Equipment Co., be and the same are hereby dismissed with<br />

prejudice and without costs.<br />

Dated: New York New York<br />

yI7 , ,20<strong>11</strong><br />

Attorney for Defendant<br />

Safeguard Industrial Equipment Co.<br />

MCGIVNEY & KLUGER, P.C.<br />

80 Broad Street-Suite 2300<br />

New York, New York 100<strong>04</strong><br />

(212) 509-3456<br />

Fq~wq ESP<br />

ChGAtS N..<br />

Attorney for Plaintiffs<br />

Arthur J. Mediate and Harriet Mediate<br />

Weitz & Luxenberg, P.C.<br />

700 Broadway<br />

New York, New York 1000<br />

(2 12) 558-5500<br />

N0038955-1


SUPEME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK<br />

COUNTY OF NEW YORK<br />

IN RE: NEW YORK COUNTY<br />

NYCAL<br />

ASBESTOS LITIGATION<br />

I.A.S. Part 30<br />

(Heitler, J.)<br />

THIS DOCUMENT REFERS TO:<br />

ARTHUR J. MEDIATE AND HARRIET<br />

MEDIATE,<br />

-against-<br />

A. C. & S., INC., et al.,<br />

Plaintiffs,<br />

Defendants.<br />

Index No,: 190358/10<br />

NO OPPOSITION<br />

SUMMARY JUDGMENT<br />

MOTION AND ORDER<br />

WHEREFORE, defendant, Oakfabco, Inc., hereby requests summary judgment in the<br />

above entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules $ 3212, dismissing plaintiffs'<br />

complaint against defendant, Oakfabco, Inc., with prejudice in this action, and there being no<br />

opposition thereto,<br />

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against<br />

defendant, Oakfabco, Inc., be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and without<br />

costs.<br />

Dated: New Y rk, New York<br />

q7 ,20<strong>11</strong><br />

-<br />

-<br />

Roiert Darish, Esq.<br />

Attorney for Defendant<br />

Oakfabco, Inc.<br />

MCGIVNEY & KLUGER, P.C.<br />

80 Broad Street-Suite 2300<br />

New York, New York 100<strong>04</strong><br />

(212) 509-3456<br />

n<br />

ChdK b.1: k54SD7, E?.<br />

Attorney for Plaintiffs<br />

Arthur J. Mediate and Harriet Mediate<br />

Weitz & Luxenberg, P.C.<br />

700 Broadway FILED<br />

New York, New York 10003<br />

(212) 558-5500<br />

APR 2 6 2o1'<br />

SO ORDERED, \<br />

Hon. Sherry Klein Heitler<br />

2571-0771<br />

N00389SS-I


SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK<br />

COUNTY OF NEW YORK<br />

IN RE: NEW YORK COUNTY j NYCAL<br />

ASBESTOS LITIGATION<br />

j I.A.S. Part 30<br />

i (Heitler, J.)<br />

THIS DOCUMENT REFERS TO:<br />

i Index No.: 190358/10<br />

ARTHUR J. MEDIATE AND HARRIET<br />

MEDIATE,<br />

/ NO OPPOSITION<br />

Plaintiffs, j SUMMARY JUDGMENT<br />

i MOTION AND ORDER<br />

-against-<br />

A, C. & S., INC., et al.,<br />

Defendants.<br />

j<br />

WHEREFORE, defendant, Kentile Floors, Inc., hereby requests summary judgment in<br />

the above entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules 5 3212, dismissing plaintiffs’<br />

complaint against defendant, Kentile Floors, Inc., with prejudice in this action, and there being<br />

no opposition thereto,<br />

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against<br />

defendant, Kentile Floors, Inc., be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and without<br />

costs.<br />

Dated: New York, New York<br />

y/7 ,20<strong>11</strong><br />

Attorney Carol M. for Tempesta, Defendant Esq.<br />

Kentile Floors, Inc.<br />

MCGIVNEY & KLUGER, P.C.<br />

80 Broad Street-Suite 2300<br />

New York, New York 100<strong>04</strong><br />

(212) 509-3456<br />

7Attorney for Plaintiffs<br />

Arthur J. Mediate and Harriet Mediate<br />

Weitz & Luxenberg, P.C.<br />

New 700 Broadway York, New York 10003<br />

(212) 558-5500<br />

!LED<br />

~ P R 2 6 20<strong>11</strong><br />

SO ORDERED,<br />

N00389SS-1<br />

zosz-r@<br />

>!€$,I YORK<br />

,,N’py CLERKS OFFid


SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK<br />

COUNTY OF NEW YORK<br />

IN RE: NEW YORK COUNTY<br />

! NYCAL<br />

ASBESTOS LITIGATION<br />

j I.A.S. Part 30<br />

! (Heitler, J.)<br />

THIS DOCUMENT REFERS TO:<br />

Index No.: 190358/10<br />

ARTHUR J. MEDIATE AND HARRIET<br />

MEDIATE,<br />

NO OPPOSITION<br />

Plaintiffs, SUMMARY JUDGMENT<br />

MOTION AND ORDER<br />

-against-<br />

A. C. & S., INC., et al.,<br />

Defendants.<br />

WHEREFORE, defendant, Treadwell Corporation, hereby requests summary judgment in<br />

the above entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules 6 3212, dismissing plaintiffs’<br />

complaint against defendant, Treadwell Corporation, with prejudice in this action, and there<br />

being no opposition thereto,<br />

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against<br />

defendant, Treadwell Corporation, be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and<br />

without costs.<br />

-4--<br />

Dated: New Y rk, New York<br />

,20<strong>11</strong><br />

Chd3 M. kpw, ‘s9.<br />

Attorney for Defendant<br />

Attorney for Plaintiffs<br />

Treadwell Corporation<br />

Arthur J. Mediate and Harriet Mediate<br />

MCGIVNEY & KLUGER, P.C.<br />

Weitz & Luxenberg, P.C.<br />

80 Broad Street-Suite 2300<br />

700 Broadway<br />

New York, New York 100<strong>04</strong><br />

New York, New York 100<br />

(212) 509-3456 (212) 558-5500<br />

FILED<br />

SO ORDERED,<br />

Hon, Sherry Klein Heitler<br />

ApR 2 6 20’’<br />

N0038955-1


SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK<br />

COUNTY OF NEW YORK<br />

IN RE: NEW YON COUNTY \ NYCAL<br />

ASBESTOS LITIGATION<br />

I.A.S. Part 30<br />

(Heitler, J.)<br />

THIS DOCUMENT REFERS TO:<br />

ARTHUR J. MEDIATE AND HARRIET<br />

MEDIATE,<br />

-against-<br />

A. C. & S., INC,, et al.,<br />

Plaintiffs,<br />

Defendants.<br />

Index No.: 190358/10<br />

NO OPPOSITION<br />

SUMMARY JUDGMENT<br />

MOTION AND ORDER<br />

WHEREFORE7 defendant, Karnak Corporation, hereby requests summary judgment in<br />

the above entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules 4 3212, dismissing plaintiffs’<br />

complaint against defendant, Karnak Corporation, with prejudice in this action, and there being<br />

no opposition thereto,<br />

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against<br />

defendant, Karnak Corporation, be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and<br />

without costs.<br />

Dated: New York, New York<br />

yI, ,20<strong>11</strong><br />

b<br />

Attorney for Defendant<br />

Karnak Corporation<br />

MCGIVNEY & KLUGER, P.C.<br />

80 Broad Street-Suite 2300<br />

New York, New York 100<strong>04</strong><br />

Attorney for Plaintiffs<br />

Arthur 1. Mediate and Harriet Mediate<br />

Weitz & Luxenberg, P.C.<br />

700 Broadway<br />

New York, New York 10003<br />

N0038955-1<br />

78 1 -0038


SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK<br />

COUNTY OF NEW YORK<br />

IN RE: NEW YORK COUNTY j NYCAL<br />

ASBESTOS LI'TIGATION<br />

j I.A.S. Part 30<br />

j (Heitler, J.)<br />

THIS DOCUMENT REFERS TO:<br />

; Index No.: 190358/10<br />

ARTHUR J. MEDIATE AND HARRIET<br />

MEDIATE,<br />

i NO OPPOSITION<br />

Plaintiffs, j SUMMARY JUDGMENT<br />

j MOTION AND ORDER<br />

-against-<br />

A. C. & S., INC., et ul.,<br />

Defendants. !<br />

WHEREFORE7 defendant, Patterson Pump Co., hereby requests summary judgment in<br />

the above entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules 0 3212, dismissing plaintiffs'<br />

complaint against defendant, Patterson Pump Co., with prejudice in this action, and there being<br />

no opposition thereto,<br />

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against<br />

defendant, Patterson Pump Co., be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and without<br />

costs.<br />

Dated: New Y rk, New York<br />

f7 ,20<strong>11</strong><br />

Patterson Pump Co.<br />

MCGIVNEY & KLUGER, P.C.<br />

80 Broad Street-Suite 2300<br />

New York, New York 100<strong>04</strong><br />

(2 12) 509-3456<br />

Attorney for Plaintiffs<br />

Arthur J. Mediate and<br />

Weitz & Luxenberg, P.C.<br />

700 Broadway<br />

New York, New York 10003<br />

(212) 558-5500 hpR 2 6 20<strong>11</strong><br />

454-9409<br />

NO03895 S- 1


SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK<br />

COUNTY OF NEW YORK<br />

IN RE: NEW YORK COUNTY i NYCAL<br />

ASBESTOS LITIGATION<br />

j I.A.S. Part 30<br />

i (Heitler, J.)<br />

THIS DOCUMENT REFERS TO:<br />

ARTHUR J. MEDIATE AND HARRIET<br />

MEDIATE,<br />

-against-<br />

A. C. & S., INC., et al.,<br />

Plaintiffs,<br />

j Index No.: 190358/10<br />

i<br />

NO OPPOSITION<br />

i SUMMARY JUDGMENT<br />

j MOTION AND ORDER<br />

Defendants,<br />

j<br />

WHEREFORE, defendant, Courter & Company, Inc., hereby requests summary<br />

judgment in the above entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules § 3212, dismissing<br />

plaintiffs' complaint against defendant, Courter & Company, Inc., with prejudice in this action,<br />

and there being no opposition thereto,<br />

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against<br />

defendant, Courter & Company, Inc., be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and<br />

without costs.<br />

MCGIVNEY & KLUGER, P.C.<br />

80 Broad Street-Suite 2300<br />

New York, New York 100<strong>04</strong><br />

(212) 509-3456<br />

SO ORDERED,<br />

Chad6 &1*<br />

kpm, k>.<br />

Attorney for Plaintiffs<br />

Arthur J. Mediate and Harriet Mediate<br />

Weitz & Luxenberg, P.C.<br />

700 Broadway<br />

New York, New York 10<br />

(212) 558-5500<br />

APR 2 6 20'1<br />

NEN YOHK<br />

myp CLERKS OFFICk<br />

1 9<br />

N0038955-1


SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK<br />

COUNTY OF NEW YORK<br />

IN RE: NEW YORK COUNTY j NYCAL<br />

ASBESTOS LITIGATION<br />

j I.A.S. Part 30<br />

: (Heitler, J.)<br />

THIS DOCUMENT REFERS TO:<br />

j Index No.: 190365/10<br />

DOUGLAS J. WOOLSEY, AS PROPOSED<br />

ADMINISTRATOR FOR THE ESTATE OF<br />

RAYMOND E. WOOLSEY, AND EDNA C.<br />

WOOLSEY, INDIVIDUALLY,<br />

i NO OPPOSITION<br />

j SUMMARY JUDGMENT<br />

Plaintiffs,<br />

j MOTION AND ORDER<br />

-against-<br />

A. C. & S., INC., et al.,<br />

Defendants.<br />

j<br />

WHEREFORE, defendant, Aurora Pump Company, hereby requests summary judgment<br />

in the above entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules 8 3212, dismissing<br />

plaintiffs' complaint against defendant, Aurora Pump Company, with prejudice in this action,<br />

and there being no opposition thereto,<br />

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against<br />

defendant, Aurora Pump Company, be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and<br />

without costs.<br />

Dated: New York. New York -<br />

'Michelle D. Grady, Esq.<br />

Attorney for Defendant<br />

Aurora Pump Company<br />

MCGIVNEY & KLUGER, P.C.<br />

80 Broad Street-Suite 2300<br />

New York, New York 100<strong>04</strong><br />

Chd0 H. %UJa7, $.<br />

Attorney for Plaintiffs<br />

Estate of Raymond E. Wool<br />

Weitz & Luxenberg, P.C.<br />

700 Broadway<br />

New York, New York 10003<br />

(212) 509-3456 (212) 558-5500<br />

FILED<br />

LPR 2 6 20''<br />

SO ORDERED,<br />

N0038955-1<br />

y Klzn Heitler<br />

APR 15 zom<br />

1003-<strong>04</strong>2 1


~ ~~<br />

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK<br />

COUNTY OF NEW YORK<br />

IN RE: NEW YORK COUNTY j NYCAL<br />

ASBESTOS LITIGATION<br />

j I.A.S. Part 30<br />

! (Heitler, J.)<br />

THIS DOCUMENT REFERS TO:<br />

DOUGLAS J. WOOLSEY, AS PROPOSED<br />

ADMINISTRATOR FOR THE ESTATE OF<br />

RAYMOND E. WOOLSEY, AND EDNA C.<br />

WOOLSEY, INDIVIDUALLY ,,<br />

-against-<br />

A. C. & S., INC., et al.,<br />

Plaintiffs,<br />

j Index No.: 190365<strong>11</strong> 0<br />

[ NO OPPOSITION<br />

j SUMMARY JUDGMENT<br />

j MOTION AND ORDER<br />

Defendants.<br />

WHEREFORE, defendant, Courter & Company, Inc., hereby requests summary<br />

judgment in the above entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules 8 3212, dismissing<br />

plaintiffs' complaint against defendant, Courter & Company, Inc., with prejudice in this action,<br />

and there being no opposition thereto,<br />

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against<br />

defendant, Courter & Company, Inc., be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and<br />

without costs.<br />

1<br />

Dated: New xqrk, New York<br />

Attorney for Plaintiffs<br />

Estate of Raymond E. Wool<br />

MCGIVNEY & KLUGER, P.C.<br />

WeitzkLuxenberg,~.~. I L E D<br />

SO Broad Street-Suite 2300<br />

700 Broadway<br />

New York. New York 100<strong>04</strong>, New York, New York 10003<br />

(212) 509-3456<br />

APR 2 6 20<strong>11</strong><br />

SO ORDERED,<br />

NEW YORK<br />

COUNTY CLERK'S OFFIa'<br />

<strong>11</strong>22-23852<br />

N00389SS-1


SUPREME cowr OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK<br />

COUNTY OF NEW YORK<br />

IN RE: NEW YORK COUNTY<br />

NYCAL<br />

ASBESTOS LITIGATION<br />

I.A.S. Part 30<br />

(Heitler, J.)<br />

THIS DOCUMENT REFERS TO:<br />

DOUGLAS J. WOOLSEY, AS PROPOSED<br />

ADMINISTRATOR FOR THE ESTATE OF<br />

RAYMOND E. WOOLSEY, AND EDNA C.<br />

WOOLSEY, INDIVIDUALLY,<br />

-against-<br />

A. C. & S., INC., et al.,<br />

Plaintiffs,<br />

Defendants.<br />

Index No.: 190365/10<br />

NO OPPOSITION<br />

SUMMARY JUDGMENT<br />

MOTION AND ORDER<br />

WHEREFORE, defendant, Columbia Boiler, hereby requests summary judgment in the<br />

above entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules $ 3212, dismissing plaintiffs’<br />

complaint against defendant, Columbia Boiler, with prejudice in this action, and there being no<br />

opposition thereto,<br />

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against<br />

defendant, Columbia Boiler, be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and without<br />

costs.<br />

Dated: New York, New York<br />

/, 717 ,20<strong>11</strong><br />

Attorney for Defendant<br />

Columbia Boiler<br />

MCGIVNEY & KLUGER, P.C.<br />

80 Broad Street-Suite 2300<br />

New York, New York 100<strong>04</strong><br />

(212) 509-3456<br />

A<br />

c-hqcps u. PSli807, e$.<br />

Attorney for Plaintiffs<br />

Estate of Raymond E. Woolsey<br />

Weitz & Luxenberg, P.C.<br />

700 Broadway<br />

New York, New York 100<br />

(212) 558-5500<br />

I” .<br />

SO ORDERED, -<br />

v-<br />

Hon. Sherry Klei2Heitler<br />

N0038955-1


SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK<br />

COUNTY OF NEW YORK<br />

IN RE: NEW YORK COUNTY j NYCAL<br />

ASBESTOS LITIGATION<br />

j I.A.S. Part 30<br />

! (Heitler, J.)<br />

THIS DOCUMENT REFERS TO:<br />

j<br />

Index No.: 190365AO<br />

DOUGLAS J. WOOLSEY, AS PROPOSED<br />

ADMINISTRATOR FOR THE ESTATE OF<br />

RAYMOND E. WOOLSEY, AND EDNA C,<br />

WOOLSEY, INDIVIDUALLY,<br />

i NO OPPOSITION<br />

j SUMMARY JUDGMENT<br />

Plaintiffs,<br />

j MOTION AND ORDER<br />

-against-<br />

A. C. & S,, INC., et al.,<br />

Defendants. /<br />

WHEREFORE, defendant, Oakfabco, Inc., hereby requests summary judgment in the<br />

above entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules $ 3212, dismissing plaintiffs’<br />

complaint against defendant, Oakfabco, Inc., with prejudice in this action, and there being no<br />

opposition thereto,<br />

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against<br />

defendant, Oakfabco, Tnc., be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and without<br />

costs.<br />

Oakfabco, Inc.<br />

Estate of Raymond E. Woolsey<br />

MCGIVNEY & KLUGEK, P.C.<br />

Weitz & Luxenberg, P.C.<br />

80 Broad Street-Suite 2300<br />

700 Broadway<br />

New York, New York 100<strong>04</strong> New York, New York 10003<br />

(212) 509-3456 (212) 558-5500<br />

SO ORDERED,<br />

2571-772<br />

N0038955-1<br />

APE I 5 70<strong>11</strong>


SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK<br />

COUNTY OF NEW YORK<br />

IN RE: NEW YORK COUNTY<br />

NYCAL<br />

ASBESTOS LITIGATION<br />

I.A.S. Part 30<br />

(Heitler, J.)<br />

THIS DOCUMENT REFERS TO:<br />

DOUGLAS J. WOOLSEY, AS PROPOSED<br />

ADMINISTRATOR FOR THE ESTATE OF<br />

RAYMOND E. WOOLSEY, AND EDNA C.<br />

WOOLSEY, INDIVIDUALLY,<br />

-against-<br />

A. C. & S., INC., et al.,<br />

Plaintiffs,<br />

Defendants.<br />

Index No.: 190365/10<br />

NO OPPOSITION<br />

SUMMARY JUDGMENT<br />

MOTION AND ORDER<br />

WHEREFORE, defendant, Kentile Floors, Inc., hereby requests summary judgment in<br />

the above entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules 6 3212, dismissing plaintiffs'<br />

complaint against defendant, Kentile Floors, Inc., with prejudice in this action, and there being<br />

no opposition thereto,<br />

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against<br />

defendant, Kentile Floors, Inc., be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and without<br />

costs.<br />

Dated: New Yor , New York<br />

/3n $7 ,20<strong>11</strong><br />

Y, ,<br />

Carol M. Tempesta, Esq.<br />

Attorney for Defendant<br />

Kentile Floors, Inc.<br />

MCGIVNEY & KLUGER, P.C.<br />

80 Broad Street-Suite 2300<br />

New York, New York 100<strong>04</strong><br />

(212) 509-3456<br />

SO ORDERED,<br />

Attorney for Plaintiffs<br />

Estate of Raymond E. Woolsey<br />

Weitz & Luxenberg, P.C.<br />

700 Broadway<br />

New York, New York 10003<br />

BpR 2 6 2Q"<br />

N0038955-1


WHEREFORE, defendant Parker Hannifin Corporation hereby requests s m q<br />

judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212,<br />

dismissing plaintiffs' complaint against defendant Parker Hannifin Corporation with prejudice,<br />

and there being no opposition thereto,<br />

ORDEED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against<br />

defendant Parker Hannifin Corporation be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and<br />

without costs.<br />

Attorneys for Plaintiff<br />

800 Third Avenue<br />

New York, New York 10022<br />

21 2.605.6200<br />

SO ORDERED,<br />

Richard P. O'Leary, Esq.<br />

U<br />

McCarter & English, LLP<br />

Attorneys for Defendant<br />

Parker Hannifin Corporation<br />

245 Park Avm,I D<br />

NewYork,Ne Yo 1<br />

2 12.609.6800<br />

APR 2 6 20<strong>11</strong><br />

NEW YORK<br />

COUNTY CLERK'S OFFICE'<br />

ME1 <strong>11</strong>161989v.1


SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK<br />

COUNTY OF NEW YORK<br />

JAMES GUCK and JOAN GUCK,<br />

X<br />

NYCAL<br />

Index No. 10/190368<br />

-V-<br />

Plaintiff(s),<br />

A,O. SMITH WATER PRODUCTS CO., et al.,<br />

NO OPPOSITION<br />

SUMMARY JUDGMENT<br />

MOTION AND ORDER<br />

Justice Sherry K. Heitler<br />

I<br />

I<br />

Defendants.<br />

X<br />

WHEREFORE, defendant Hopeman Brothers, Inc. hereby requests summary judgment in the<br />

above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212, dismissing plaintiff's<br />

complaint against defendant Hopeman Brothers, Inc. with prejudice, and there being no opposition<br />

thereto,<br />

Ordered, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against defendant<br />

Hopeman Brothers, Inc., be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and without costs.<br />

D a t e m r k % r York<br />

, 20<strong>11</strong><br />

LEVY, PHILLIPS & KONIGSBERG, L.L.P.<br />

DARGER & ERRANTE LLP<br />

SO ORDERED:<br />

+- (21 2) 452-5300


SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK<br />

COUNTY OF NEW YORK<br />

IN RE: NEW YORK COUNTY j NYCAL<br />

ASBESTOS LITIGATION<br />

j I.A.S. Part 30<br />

j (Heitler, J,)<br />

THIS DOCUMENT REFERS TO:<br />

j Index No.: 190370/10<br />

ARUNKUMAR PATEL,<br />

-against-<br />

A. C. & S., INC., et al.,<br />

Plaintiffs,<br />

i NO OPPOSITION<br />

! SUMMARY JUDGMENT<br />

i MOTION AND ORDER<br />

Defendants. [<br />

WHEREFORE, defendant, Kentile Floors, Inc., hereby requests summary judgment in<br />

the above entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules 6 32 12, dismissing plaintiffs'<br />

complaint against defendant, Kentile Floors, Inc., with prejudice in this action, and there being<br />

no opposition thereto,<br />

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against<br />

defendant, Kentile Floors, Inc., be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and without<br />

costs.<br />

Dated: New Y rk, New York<br />

7/77 ,20<strong>11</strong><br />

Attorney Carol M. for Ternpesta, Defendant E s F<br />

Kentile Floors, Inc.<br />

Arunkurnar Patel<br />

MCGIVNEY & KLUGER, P.C.<br />

Weitz & Luxenberg, P.C.<br />

80 Broad Street-Suite 2300 700 Broadway APR 2 6 20<strong>11</strong><br />

New York, New York 100<strong>04</strong><br />

New York, New York 10003<br />

(212) 509-3456 (212) 558-5500<br />

NEW YORK<br />

COUNTY CLERK'S 6FFm<br />

7Attorney for Plaintiffs P I L E I)<br />

SO ORDERED,<br />

N0038955-1<br />

Hon. Sherry KleK Heitler<br />

2082- 10382


SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK<br />

COUNTY OF NEW YORK<br />

IN RE: NEW YORK COUNTY i NYCAL<br />

ASBESTOS LITIGATION i I.A.S. Part 30<br />

(Heitler, J.)<br />

THIS DOCUMENT REFERS TO:<br />

MICHAEL C, SACCENTO AND CATHERINE<br />

SACCENTO,<br />

"against-<br />

A, C. & S., INC, et al.,<br />

Plaintiffs,<br />

Defendants.<br />

i<br />

Index No.: 190376<strong>11</strong> 0<br />

NO OPPOSITION<br />

SUMMARY JUDGMENT<br />

MOTION AND ORDER<br />

I<br />

I<br />

!<br />

WHEREFORE, defendant, Kentile Floors, Inc., hereby requests summary judgment in<br />

the above entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules<br />

3212, dismissing plaintiffs'<br />

complaint against defendant, Kentile Floors, Inc., with prejudice in this action, and there being<br />

no opposition thereto,<br />

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against<br />

defendant, Kentile Floors, Inc., be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and without<br />

costs.<br />

Dated: New Y k, New York<br />

$ ,20<strong>11</strong><br />

Carol M. Teipesta, Esq. "<br />

Attorney for Defendant<br />

Kentile Floors, Inc.<br />

MCGIVNEY & KLUGER, P.C.<br />

80 Broad Street-Suite 2300<br />

New York, New York 100<strong>04</strong><br />

(2 12) 509-3456<br />

Michael C. Saccento and Catherine Saccento<br />

Weitz & Luxenberg, P.C.<br />

700 Broadway<br />

New York, New York 10003<br />

(212) 558-5500<br />

SO ORDERED,<br />

NO038955-1<br />

Hon, Shdrry Klein Heitler<br />

2082-1 0384


SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YON<br />

COUNTY OF NEW YORK<br />

IN RE: NEW YORK COUNTY<br />

! NYCAL<br />

ASBESTOS LITIGATION<br />

I.A.S. Part 30<br />

(Heitler, J.)<br />

-<br />

THIS DOCUMENT REFERS TO:<br />

MICHAEL C. SACCENTO AND CATHERINE<br />

SACCENTO,<br />

-against-<br />

Plaintiffs,<br />

Index No.: 190376<strong>11</strong> 0<br />

NO OPPOSITION<br />

SUMMARY JUDGMENT<br />

MOTION AND ORDER<br />

A, C. & S., INC., et al.,<br />

Defendants.<br />

j<br />

WHEREFORE, defendant, Treadwell Corporation, hereby requests summary judgment in<br />

the above entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules 6 3212, dismissing plaintiffs'<br />

complaint against defendant, Treadwell Corporation, with prejudice in this action, and there<br />

being no opposition thereto,<br />

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against<br />

defendant, Treadwell Corporation, be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and<br />

without costs.<br />

Dated: New York, New York<br />

417 ,20<strong>11</strong><br />

Michele J. Mittlef;;an, Esq.<br />

Attorney for Defendant<br />

Treadwell Corporation<br />

MCGIVNEY & KLUGER, P.C.<br />

80 Broad Street-Suite 2300<br />

New York, New York 100<strong>04</strong><br />

(212) 509-3456<br />

Michaei C. Saccento and Catherine Saccento<br />

Weitz & Luxenberg, P.C.<br />

700 Broadway<br />

New York, New York 10003<br />

(2 12) 558-5500<br />

__,_"...<br />

SO ORDERED,<br />

N0038955-1<br />

Hon. Sherry Klein Heitler<br />

1235-23481


SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK<br />

COUNTY OF NEW YORK<br />

IN RE: NEW YORK COUNTY<br />

! NYCAL<br />

ASBESTOS LITIGATION<br />

j I.A.S. Part 30<br />

! (Heitler, J.)<br />

THIS DOCUMENT REFERS TO:<br />

MICHAEL C. SACCENTO AND CATHERINE<br />

SACCENTO,<br />

"against-<br />

A. C. & S., INC., et al.,<br />

Plaintiffs,<br />

j Index No.: 190376/10<br />

!<br />

i NO OPPOSITION<br />

! SUMMARY JUDGMENT<br />

MOTION AND ORDER<br />

i<br />

Defendants.<br />

j<br />

WHEREFORE, defendant, Courter & Company, Inc., hereby requests summary<br />

judgment in the above entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules $3212, dismissing<br />

plaintiffs' complaint against defendant, Courter & Company, Inc., with prejudice in this action,<br />

and there being no opposition thereto,<br />

ORDERED, that upon notice to all eo-defendants, all claims and cross claims against<br />

defendant, Courter & Company, Inc., be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and<br />

without costs,<br />

Dated: New Yo k, New York<br />

,20<strong>11</strong><br />

FILED<br />

APR 2 6 20<strong>11</strong><br />

NEW YORK<br />

COUNT( CLERKS OFFICE'<br />

Attorney for Plaintiffs<br />

Michael C. Saccento and Catherine Saccento<br />

McGrwY & KLUGER, P.C.<br />

Weitz & Luxenberg, P.C.<br />

80 Broad Street-Suite 2300<br />

700 Broadway<br />

New York, New York 100<strong>04</strong><br />

New York, New York 10003<br />

(212) 509-3456 (212) 558-5500<br />

SO ORDERED,<br />

NO03 8955- 1<br />

Hon. Sherry Kfein Heitler<br />

<strong>11</strong>22-23857


SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK<br />

COUNTY OF NEW YORK<br />

IN RE NEW YORK CITY<br />

ASBESTOS LITIGATION<br />

GEORGIANA TANSOSCH, Individually and as Executrix of<br />

the Estate of CHRISTOPHER T. TANSOSCH, Deceased,<br />

1.<br />

NYCAL<br />

Index No. 190382/20 10<br />

-against-<br />

Plaintiffs,<br />

NO OPPOSITION<br />

SUMMARY JUDGMENT<br />

MOTION AND ORDER<br />

A.O. SMITH WATER PRODUCTS, et al.,<br />

including SEARS, ROEBUCK AND CO.,<br />

Defendants.<br />

._<br />

WHEREFORE, defendant Sears, Roebuck and Co. (incorrectly sued herein as Sears, Roebuck<br />

and Company) (hereinafter “Sears”) hereby requests summary judgment in the above-entitled case,<br />

pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212, dismissing plaintiffs’ complaint against<br />

defendant Sears with prejudice, and there being no opposition thereto,<br />

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against defendant<br />

Sears be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and without costs.<br />

Dated:<br />

New York, New York<br />

March 22,201 1<br />

BELLUCK & FOX, LLP<br />

546 Fifth Avenue, 4“ Floor 150 Broadway, Suite 600<br />

New York, New York 10036<br />

New York, New York 10038<br />

APR 2 6 2u<strong>11</strong><br />

Attorneys for Plaintiffs<br />

Attorneys for Defendant<br />

Christopher Tansosch, et al. Sears, Roebuck and Co. fwv YORK<br />

(212) 681-1575 .TO285 ‘OUNw cLERRs<br />

SO ORDERED,<br />

APR 15 20<strong>11</strong>


SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK<br />

COUNTY OF NEW YORK<br />

IN RE: NEW YORK COUNTY<br />

! NYCAL<br />

ASBESTOS LITIGATION<br />

j I.A.S. Part 30<br />

j (Heitler, J.)<br />

THIS DOCUMENT REFERS TO:<br />

i Index No.: 190384/10<br />

FRANCIS P. MCPADDEN,<br />

-against-<br />

A. C. & S., INC., et al,,<br />

Plaintiffs, i NO OPPOSITION<br />

/ SUMMARY JUDGMENT<br />

i MOTION AND ORDER<br />

Defendants.<br />

WHEREFORE, defendant, Flowserve Corporation Wa The Duriron Company, Inc.,<br />

hereby requests summary judgment in the above entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law<br />

and Rules $ 3212, dismissing plaintiffs’ complaint against defendant, Flowserve Corporation<br />

fMa The Duriron Company, Inc., with prejudice in this action, and there being no opposition<br />

thereto,<br />

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against<br />

defendant, Flowserve Corporation fMa The Duriron Company, Inc., be and the same are hereby<br />

dismissed with prejudice and without costs.<br />

Dated: New York, New York<br />

L*<br />

”<br />

Matthew Attorney T. for Fakley, Defendant Esq. Attorney c for 6 Plaintiffs bf- FeQltSO,, “SS<br />

Flowserve Corporation<br />

Francis P. McPadden<br />

D !<br />

MCGIVNEY & KLUGER, P.C.<br />

Weitz&Luxenberg,P.C.F \ t E<br />

80 Broad Street-Suite 2300<br />

700 Broadway<br />

New York, New York 100<strong>04</strong><br />

(2 12) 509-3455<br />

SO ORDERED,<br />

951-894<br />

N0038955- 1


SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK<br />

COUNTY OF NEW YORK<br />

IN RE: NEW YORK COUNTY j NYCAL<br />

ASBESTOS LITIGATION<br />

j I.A.S. Part 30<br />

j (Heitler, J.)<br />

THIS DOCUMENT REFERS TO:<br />

j Index No,: 190384/10<br />

FRANCIS P. MCPADDEN,<br />

magainst-<br />

A. C. & S., INC., et al.,<br />

Plaintiffs,<br />

i NO OPPOSITION<br />

! SUMMARY JUDGMENT<br />

i MOTION AND ORDER<br />

Defendants. !<br />

WHEREFORE, defendant, Kentile Floors, Inc,, hereby requests summary judgment in<br />

the above entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules 5 3212, dismissing plaintiffs’<br />

complaint against defendant, Kentile Floors, Inc., with prejudice in this action, and there being<br />

no opposition thereto,<br />

ORDEED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against<br />

defendant, Kentile Floors, Inc., be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and without<br />

costs.<br />

@k*<br />

Carol M. Tempesta, Esk. ’<br />

Gl+s cl. FegmTJ/Zs&<br />

Dated: New York, New York<br />

,20<strong>11</strong><br />

4-l ’<br />

Attorney for Defendant<br />

Kentile Floors, Inc.<br />

MCGIVNEY & KLUGER, P.C.<br />

80 Broad Street-Suite 2300<br />

New York, New York 100<strong>04</strong><br />

(212) 509-3456<br />

Attorney for Plaintiffs<br />

Francis P. McPadden<br />

Weitz & Luxenberg, P.C.<br />

700 Broadway<br />

New York, New York ]OF I L E D<br />

SO ORDERED,<br />

APR 2 6 20<strong>11</strong><br />

NEW YORK<br />

f349tJM34d CLERKS OFFj@<br />

N0038955-1


SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK<br />

COUNTY OF NEW YORK<br />

IN RE: NEW YORK COUNTY<br />

j NYCAL<br />

ASBESTOS LITIGATION<br />

j I.A.S. Part 30<br />

! (Heitler, J.)<br />

THIS DOCUMENT REFERS TO:<br />

i Index No.: 190384/10<br />

FRANCIS P. MCPADDEN,<br />

Plaintiffs, i NO OPPOSITION<br />

j SUMMARY JUDGMENT<br />

-against- j MOTION AND ORDER<br />

A. C. & S., INC., et al.,<br />

Defendants. /<br />

WHEREFORE, defendant, The Fairbanks Company, hereby requests summary judgment<br />

in the above entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules 4 3212, dismissing<br />

plaintiffs’ complaint against defendant, The Fairbanks Company, with prejudice in this action,<br />

and there being no opposition thereto,<br />

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against<br />

defendant, The Fairbanks Company, be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and<br />

without costs.<br />

Okwedeo N. Okoh, Esq.<br />

Attorney for Defendant<br />

Attorney for Plaintiffs<br />

The Fairbanks Company<br />

Francis P. McPadden<br />

MCGIVNEY & KLUGER, P.C.<br />

Weitz & Luxenberg, P.C.<br />

80 Broad Street-Suite 2300<br />

700 Broadway<br />

New York, New York 100<strong>04</strong><br />

New York, New York 100<br />

(212) 509-3456 (212) 558-5500<br />

N00389SS-1<br />

AP63 15 20<strong>11</strong>


SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK<br />

COUNTY OF NEW YORK<br />

In Re: NEW YORK CITYASBESTOS LITIGATION<br />

Index No.: 190384/10<br />

FRANCIS McPADDEN,<br />

- against -<br />

AC and S, Pic., (ARMSGTRONG<br />

CONTRACTING & SUPPLY) et al.,<br />

Plaintiff(s),<br />

Defendants.<br />

NO OPPOSITION<br />

SUMMARY JUDGMENT<br />

MOTION<br />

WHEREFORE, Defendant WEIL-MCLAIN COMPANY, INC,, hereinafter ("WEIL-<br />

MCLAIN") hereby requests Summary Judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil<br />

Practice Law and Rules Section 32 12, dismissing plaintiffs complaint against Defendant Weil-<br />

McLain with prejudice, and there being no opposition thereto,<br />

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against<br />

Defendant, Weil-McLain be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and without costs<br />

to either party.<br />

Dated: qhf ,20<strong>11</strong><br />

New York, New York<br />

WEITZ & LUXENBERG, P.C.<br />

Attorneys for Plaintiff<br />

SEGAL MCCAMBRIDGE<br />

SINGER & MAHONEY, LTD.<br />

700 Broadway Attorneys forDefendant I E D<br />

New York, NY 10003<br />

(212) 558-5500<br />

SO ORDERED,<br />

H<br />

Weil-McLain<br />

850 Third Avenue, Suite <strong>11</strong>00<br />

New York, NY 10022 ApR 2 6 20<strong>11</strong><br />

"W-Y<br />

IVEW YORK<br />

CLERRS OFFcE


SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK<br />

COUNTY OF NEW YORK<br />

IN RE NEW YORK CITY ASBESTOS LITIGATION NYCAL<br />

Hon. Sherry Klein Heitler<br />

MARVIN EISENBERG and LORRAINE EISENBERG,<br />

X<br />

X<br />

Index No. 190397-2010<br />

-against-<br />

Plaint iff (s),<br />

NO OPPOSITION<br />

SUMMARY JUDGMENT MOTION AND<br />

ORDER<br />

CARRIER CORPORATION et al., including<br />

GENERAL ELECTRIC COMPANY,<br />

Defendants.<br />

X<br />

WHEREFORE, defendant GENERAL ELECTRIC COMPANY hereby requests summary judgment in<br />

the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212, dismissing plaintiffs’<br />

complaint against defendant GENERAL ELECTRIC COMPANY with prejudice, and there being no<br />

opposition thereto,<br />

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against defendant<br />

GENERAL ELECTRIC<br />

*<br />

COMPANY be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and without costs.<br />

Dated: NewY k, ewYork<br />

Attorneys for Plain tvfs<br />

Attorneys for General Electric Company<br />

546 Fifth Avenue, qfh Flo<br />

Three Gateway Center, 12‘h Floor<br />

New York, NY 10036 -. Newark, NJ 07102<br />

SO ORDERED,<br />

Hon. Sherry Klein Heitler, J.S.C.


COUNTY OF NEW YORK<br />

IN RE NEW YORK CITY ASBESTOS LITIGATION NYCAL<br />

Hon. Sherry Klein Heitler<br />

MARVIN EISENBERG and LORRAINE EISENBERG,<br />

-against-<br />

Plaint iff (s),<br />

CARRIER CORPORATION et al., including<br />

GENERAL ELECTRIC COMPANY,<br />

Defendants.<br />

X<br />

X<br />

Index No. 190397-2010<br />

NO OPPOSITION<br />

SUMMARY JUDGMENT MOTION AND<br />

ORDER<br />

WHEREFORE, defendant GENERAL ELECTRIC COMPANY hereby requests summary judgment in<br />

the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212, dismissing plaintiffs'<br />

complaint against defendant GENERAL ELECTRIC COMPANY with prejudice, and there being no<br />

opposition thereto,<br />

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against defendant<br />

GENERAL ELECTRIC COMPANY be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and without costs.<br />

Dated:<br />

New York, New York<br />

Attorneys for Plaint$fs<br />

546 Fifth Avenue, 4'h Floor<br />

New York, NY 10036<br />

Sedgwick, Detert, Moran 81 Arnold, LLP<br />

Attorneys for General Elec<br />

Three Gateway Center, 12<br />

Newark, NJ 07102<br />

APR 2 6 20<strong>11</strong><br />

SO ORDERED,<br />

8% . . I. -


SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK<br />

COUNTY OF NEW YORK<br />

IN RE: NEW YORK CITY<br />

ASBESTOS LITIGATION<br />

THOMAS J. COYNE and SUZANNE COYNE,<br />

Plaintiffs,<br />

-against-<br />

ALUMINUM COMPANY OF AMERICA (ALCOA). et al. including,<br />

GATES CORPORATION,<br />

NYCAL<br />

I.A.S. Part 30<br />

Hon. Sherry Klein Heitler, J.S.C.<br />

Index No.: 190399-2010<br />

NO OPPOSITION SUMMARY JUDGMENT<br />

MOTION AND ORDER<br />

Defendants.<br />

WHEREFORE, defendant THE GATES CORPORATION, sued herein as GATES CORPORATION<br />

hereby request summary judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules<br />

Section 3212, dismissing plaintiffs complaint against defendant GATES with prejudice, and there being<br />

no opposition thereto,<br />

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against defendant<br />

THE GATES CORPORATION be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and without costs.<br />

Dated:<br />

New York, New York<br />

APE\\ 13, tot1<br />

."<br />

Patti Burshtyn, Esq. Dennis E. VegcEsq," - (d<br />

Weitz & Luxenberg, P.C.<br />

Attorney for Plaintiffs<br />

700 Broadway<br />

New York, New York 10003<br />

Sedgwick, Detert, Moran & Arnold, LLP<br />

Attorneys far The Gates Corporation<br />

Three Gateway Center, 12fh Floor<br />

Newark, NJ 07102<br />

(212) 558-5500 -0002 F 1 L E D<br />

SO ORDERED,<br />

Hon. Sherry Klein Heitler<br />

APR 2 6 20''<br />

NJ/4343 18v 1


SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK<br />

COUNTY OF NEW YORK<br />

IN RE: NEW YORK COUNTY<br />

NYCAL<br />

ASBESTOS LITIGATION<br />

I.A.S. Part 30<br />

(Heitler, J.)<br />

THIS DOCUMENT REFERS TO:<br />

Index No.: 190399/10<br />

THOMAS J, COYNE AND SUZANNE COYNE,<br />

-against-<br />

A. C. & S., INC., et al.,<br />

Plaintiffs,<br />

Defendants.<br />

NO OPPOSITION<br />

SUMMARY JUDGMENT<br />

MOTION AND ORDER<br />

WHEREFORE, defendant, Kentile Floors, Inc., hereby requests summary judgment in<br />

the above entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules 0 3212, dismissing plaintiffs'<br />

complaint against defendant, Kentile Floors, Inc,, with prejudice in this action, and there being<br />

no opposition thereto,<br />

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against<br />

defendant, Kentile Floors, Inc., be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and without<br />

costs.<br />

Dated: New York, New York<br />

q/7 ,20<strong>11</strong><br />

Carol M. Tempesta, Esq.<br />

Attorney for Defendant<br />

Kentile Floors, Tnc.<br />

Thomas J. Coyne and Suz<br />

MCGIVNEY & KLUGER, P.C. Weitz & Luxenberg, ., P.C.<br />

80 Broad Street-Suite 2300<br />

700 Broadway<br />

New York, New York I00<strong>04</strong><br />

New York, New York 10003<br />

(2 12) 509-3456<br />

A~~ 2 6 20<strong>11</strong><br />

SO ORDERED,<br />

NEW YORK<br />

couNn CL€RKS OFFICE:<br />

2082- io534


SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK<br />

COUNTY OF NEW YORK<br />

IN RE NEW YORK CITY ASBESTOS LITIGATION NYCAL<br />

Hon. Sherry Klein Heitler<br />

JULIO C. CARAY and ROX ANA GARAY, Index NO. 19<strong>04</strong><strong>04</strong>-2010<br />

X<br />

X<br />

-against-<br />

Plaintiff(s),<br />

BORG-WARNER CORPORATION et al., including<br />

GENERAL ELECTRIC COMPANY,<br />

NO OPPOSITION<br />

SUMMARY JUDGMENT MOTION AND<br />

ORDER<br />

Defendants.<br />

X<br />

WHEREFORE, defendant GENERAL ELECTRIC COMPANY hereby requests summary judgment in<br />

the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212, dismissing plaintiffs'<br />

complaint against defendant GENERAL ELECTRIC COMPANY with prejudice, and there being no<br />

opposition thereto,<br />

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against defendant<br />

GENERAL ELECTRIC COMPANY be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and without costs.<br />

Dated:<br />

New York, New York<br />

Apd 13,201 I<br />

7 -.-<br />

Patti Burshtyn, Esq.<br />

Stephen Novakidis, Esq.<br />

Weitr & Luxenberg, P.C.<br />

Sedgwick, Detert, Mora<br />

Attorneys far Plaintil'fs<br />

Attorneys for General Ele<br />

700 Broadway<br />

Three Gateway Center, 12<br />

New York, NY 10003<br />

Newark, NJ 07102<br />

(212) 558-5500 973) 242-0002 ApR 2 6 20'<br />

SO ORDERED,<br />

--- ~<br />

-II


NYCAL<br />

I.A.S. Part 30<br />

Hon. Sherry Klein Heitler, J.S.C.<br />

JULIO C. GARAY and ROX ANA CARAY,<br />

Plaintiffs,<br />

-against-<br />

BORG-WARNER CORPORATION et al. including,<br />

GATES CORPORATION,<br />

Index No.: 19<strong>04</strong><strong>04</strong>-2010<br />

NO OPPOSITION SUMMARY JUDGMENT<br />

MOTION AND ORDER<br />

Defendants.<br />

WHEREFORE, defendant THE GATES CORPORATION, sued herein as GATES CORPORATION<br />

hereby request summary judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules<br />

Section 3212, dismissing plaintiff's complaint against defendant GATES with prejudice, and there being<br />

no opposition thereto,<br />

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against defendant<br />

THE GATES CORPORATION be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and without costs.<br />

Dated:<br />

- ..<br />

' -.k>/-d2-<br />

New York, New York<br />

A+il 13, 201 I<br />

Patti Burshtyn, Esq.<br />

Weitz & Luxenberg, P.C.<br />

Attorney for Plaintvfs<br />

700 Broadway<br />

New York, New York 10003<br />

(212) 558-5500<br />

. . (973) 242-0002<br />

Dennis E. V e g a r<br />

Sedgwick, Detert, Moran & Arnold, LLP<br />

Attorneys for The Gates Corporation<br />

Three Gateway Center, 12th Floor<br />

Newark, NJ 07102<br />

SO ORDERED,<br />

LPR 2 6 ZO'


~<br />

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK<br />

COUNTY OF NEW YORK<br />

IN RE NEW YORK CITY ASBESTOS LITIGATION NYCAL<br />

Hon. Sherry Klein Heitler<br />

X<br />

JULIO C. GARAY and ROXANA GARAY,<br />

-against-<br />

Plaintiff(s),<br />

BORC-WARNER CORPORATION et al., including<br />

CATERPILLAR INC.,<br />

Index No. 19<strong>04</strong><strong>04</strong>-2010<br />

NO OPPOSITION<br />

SUMMARY JUDGMENT MOTION AND<br />

ORDER<br />

Defendants.<br />

X<br />

WHEREFORE, defendant CATERPILLAR INC. hereby requests summary judgment in the aboveentitled<br />

case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212, dismissing plaintiffs' complaint<br />

against defendant CATERPILLAR INC. with prejudice, and there being no opposition thereto,<br />

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against defendant<br />

CATERPILLAR INC. be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and without costs.<br />

Dated:<br />

New York, New York<br />

APKll l3,20\ I<br />

.<br />

Patti Burshtyn, Esq.<br />

Stephen Novakidis, Esq.<br />

Weitz & Luxenberg, P.C.<br />

Sedgwick, Detert, Moran & Arnold, LLP<br />

Attorneys for Plaintffs<br />

Attorneys for Caterpillar Inc.<br />

700 Broadway<br />

Three Gateway Center, 12fh Floor<br />

New York, NY 10003<br />

Newark, NJ 07102<br />

(212) 558-5500 (973) 242-0002<br />

SO ORDERED,<br />

4<br />

Hon. Sherry Klein Heitler, J.S.C.<br />

WRFx<br />

FtLED<br />

rr)UN<br />

LpFl 2 6 zo"<br />

F F d<br />

C@KS O


-against-<br />

Plaintiff,<br />

New York Asbestos<br />

Litigation (NYCAL)<br />

Index No.: 19<strong>04</strong><strong>04</strong>/2010<br />

NO OPPOSITION<br />

SUMMARY<br />

JUDGMENT MOTION<br />

AND ORDER<br />

NISSAN NORTH AMERICA, INC,, et al.. ,<br />

WHEREFORE, defendant, NISSAN NORTH AMERICA, NC., hereby requests<br />

summary judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to the Civil Practice Law and Rules<br />

Section 32 12, dismissing plaintiffs Complaint against defendant, NISSAN NORTH AMERICA,<br />

INC.? with prejudice, and there being no opposition thereto.<br />

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross-claims against<br />

defendant, NISSAN NORTH AMERICA, INC., be and the same are hereby dismissed with<br />

prejudice and without costs.<br />

Dated: New York, New York<br />

&+,I 13 ,20<strong>11</strong><br />

LAWN, O'NETL, FUCCI, CEDRONE<br />

& DiSIPIO n<br />

WEITZ & LUXENBERG, P.C.<br />

By:<br />

Tirnothga cHugqEsq.<br />

Attorneys for Defendant<br />

NISSAN NORTH AMERICA, INC.,<br />

420 Lexington Avenue, Suite 335<br />

Graybar Building<br />

New York, New York 10170<br />

(212) 3 19-6898<br />

Our'File No.: 6087-95<br />

Patti Burshtyn, Esq.<br />

Attorneys for Plaintiff<br />

700 Broadway<br />

New York, New York 10003<br />

SO-ORDERED:


I<br />

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK<br />

COUNTY OF NEW YORK<br />

IN RE: NEW YORK COUNTY<br />

i NYCAL<br />

ASBESTOS LITIGATION<br />

j I.A.S. Part 30<br />

i (Heitler, J.)<br />

THIS DOCUMENT REFERS TO:<br />

j Index No.: 19<strong>04</strong><strong>11</strong>/10<br />

PATRICIA A. FOLEY AND THOMAS FOLEY, j<br />

-against-<br />

A. C. & S., INC., et al.,<br />

Plaintiffs,<br />

Defendants.<br />

i NO OPPOSITION<br />

j SUMMARY JUDGMENT<br />

i MOTION AND ORDER<br />

WHEREFORE, defendant, Columbia Boiler, hereby requests summary judgment in the<br />

above entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules 6 3212, dismissing plaintiffs'<br />

complaint against defendant, Columbia Boiler, with prejudice in this action, and there being no<br />

opposition thereto,<br />

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against<br />

defendant, Columbia Boiler, be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and without<br />

costs.<br />

Dated: New York, New York<br />

,il ,20<strong>11</strong><br />

Attorney for Defendant<br />

Columbia Boiler<br />

MCGIVNEY & KLUGER, P.C.<br />

80 Broad Street-Suite 2300<br />

New York, New York 100<strong>04</strong><br />

(212) 509-3456<br />

Attorney for Plaintiffs<br />

Patricia A. Foley and Thomas Foley<br />

Weitz & Luxenberg, P.C.<br />

700 Broadway<br />

New York, New York 10003<br />

FILED I<br />

(2 12) 558-5500<br />

SO ORDERED,<br />

Hon. Sheny Klein Heitler<br />

--..<br />

APR 2 6 20<strong>11</strong><br />

N0038955-1


NYCAL<br />

I.A,S. Part 30<br />

('Heitleq I)<br />

April 201 1 In Extremis Group<br />

LUIS ODDO,<br />

-against-<br />

A.O. SMITH WATER PRODUCTS, et al.,<br />

Plaintiffs,<br />

Index No. 19<strong>04</strong>14/2010<br />

NO OPPOSITION<br />

SUMMARY JUDGMENT<br />

MOTION AND ORDER<br />

WHEREFORE, Defendant INTERNATIONAL PAPER COMPANY Wa US.<br />

PLYWOOD CORPORATION hereby requests Summary Judgment in the above-entitled case<br />

pwsuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules $3212, dismissing plaintiff's Complaint against<br />

INTERNATIONAL PAPER COMPANY s/h/a U.S. PLYWOOD CORPORATION with<br />

prejudice, and there being no opposition thereto, it is<br />

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross-claims against<br />

INTERNATIONAL PAPER COMPANY &/a U.S. PLYWOOD CORPORATION, be and the<br />

same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and without costs.<br />

Dated: White Plains, New York<br />

Attorneys for Plaintiffs<br />

SO ORDERED:


SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK<br />

COUNTY OF NEW YORK<br />

IN RE: NEW YORK COUNTY<br />

NYCAL<br />

ASBESTOS LITIGATION<br />

I.A.S. Part 30<br />

(Heitler, J.)<br />

THIS DOCUMENT REFERS TO:<br />

Index No.: 19<strong>04</strong>15/10<br />

LINCOLN CATHERS AND NANCY CATHERS,<br />

-against-<br />

A. C. & S., INC., et al.,<br />

Plaintiffs,<br />

Defendants.<br />

NO OPPOSITION<br />

SUMMARY JUDGMENT<br />

MOTION AND ORDER<br />

WHEREFORE, defendant, Aurora Pump Company, hereby requests summary judgment<br />

in the above entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Q 3212, dismissing<br />

plaintiffs' complaint against defendant, Aurora Pump Company, with prejudice in this action,<br />

and there being no opposition thereto,<br />

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against<br />

defendant, Aurora Pump Company, be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and<br />

without costs,<br />

Dated: Ne York, New York<br />

J7 ,20<strong>11</strong><br />

I<br />

e,<br />

Chrk-<br />

/- ><br />

Attorney for Defendant<br />

Attorney for Plaintiffs<br />

uEj;)nl E?.<br />

Aurora Pump Company<br />

Lincoln Cathers and Nancy<br />

MCGIVNEY & KLUGER, P.C.<br />

Weitz & Luxenberg, P.C.<br />

80 Broad Street-Suite 2300<br />

700 Broadway<br />

New York, New York 100<strong>04</strong><br />

New York, New York 10003<br />

(212) 509-3456 (212) 558-5500<br />

SO ORDERED,<br />

-<br />

PPLED<br />

APR 2 6 20<strong>11</strong><br />

NEW YORK<br />

COUNT( CLERK'S OFFICE'<br />

N0038955-1 15 20<strong>11</strong><br />

1003-<strong>04</strong>30


SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK<br />

COUNTY OF NEW YORK -*.<br />

IN RE: NEW YORK COUNTY j NYCAL<br />

ASBESTOS LITIGATION<br />

j I.A.S. Part 30<br />

i (Heitler, J.)<br />

THIS DOCUMENT REFERS TO:<br />

j Index No.: 19<strong>04</strong>16/10<br />

RAYMOND CARELLA AND EDNA CARELLA, /<br />

-against-<br />

Plaintiffs, i NO OPPOSITION<br />

! SUMMARY JUDGMENT<br />

[ MOTION AND ORDER<br />

A. C. & S., INC., et al.,<br />

Defendants.<br />

WHEREFORE, defendant, Kentile Floors, Inc., hereby requests summary judgment in<br />

the above entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules 8 3212, dismissing plaintiffs'<br />

complaint against defendant, Kentile Floors, Inc., with prejudice in this action, and there being<br />

I ..<br />

no opposition thereto,<br />

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against<br />

defendant, Kentile Floors, Inc., be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and without<br />

costs.<br />

Dated: New Y rk, New York<br />

497 ,20<strong>11</strong><br />

Carol M Ternpesta, Esq.<br />

Attorney for Defendant<br />

Kentile Floors, Inc<br />

MCGIVNEY & KLUGER, P.C.<br />

80 Broad Street-Suite 2300<br />

New York, New York 100<strong>04</strong><br />

(212) 509-3456<br />

Raymond Carella and Edna Carella<br />

Weitz & Luxenberg, P.C,<br />

New 700 Broadway 03<br />

(212) 558-5500<br />

/ APR 2 6 20<strong>11</strong><br />

York, New York 1 FILED<br />

+.<br />

so ORDERED,<br />

N0038955-1<br />

Hon. Sherry Klein Heitler<br />

NEW YORK<br />

~ N I - CLERKS Y OFFICE'<br />

2082-10554


SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK<br />

COUNTY OF NEW YORK<br />

IN RE: NEW YORK COUNTY<br />

' NYCAL<br />

ASBESTOS LITIGATION<br />

I.A.S. Part 30<br />

(Heitler, J.)<br />

THIS DOCUMENT REFERS TO:<br />

Index No.: 19<strong>04</strong>16/10<br />

RAYMOND CARELLA AND EDNA CARELLA,<br />

-against-<br />

A. C. & S., INC., et al.,<br />

Plaintiffs,<br />

Defendants.<br />

NO OPPOSITION<br />

SUMMARY JUDGMENT<br />

MOTION AND ORDER<br />

WHEREFORE, defendant, Patterson Pump Co., hereby requests summary judgment in<br />

the above entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules 6 3212, dismissing plaintiffs'<br />

complaint against defendant, Patterson Pump Co., with prejudice in this action, and there being<br />

no opposition thereto,<br />

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against<br />

defendant, Patterson Pump Co., be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and without<br />

costs.<br />

Dated: New York, New York<br />

Lf!7 ,20<strong>11</strong><br />

Patterson Pump Co.<br />

MCGIVNEY & KLUGER, P.C.<br />

80 Broad Street-Suite 2300<br />

New York, New York 100<strong>04</strong><br />

(212) 509-3456<br />

w m WCp-dgyt)E+<br />

Attorney for Plaintiffs<br />

Raymond Carella and Edna Carella<br />

Weitz & Luxenberg, P.C.<br />

700 Broadway<br />

New York, New York 10003<br />

(212) 558-5500<br />

FILED .<br />

ApR 2 6 20"<br />

N0038955-1


~<br />

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK<br />

COUNTY OF NEW YORK<br />

IN RE: NEW YORK COUNTY<br />

NYCAL<br />

ASBESTOS LITIGATION<br />

I.A.S. Part 30<br />

(Heitler, J.)<br />

THIS DOCUMENT REFERS TO:<br />

Index No.: 19<strong>04</strong>16/10<br />

RAYMOND CARELLA AND EDNA CARELLA,<br />

-against-<br />

A. C. & S., INC., et al.,<br />

Plaintiffs,<br />

Defendants.<br />

NO OPPOSITION<br />

SUMMARY JUDGMENT<br />

MOTION AND ORDER<br />

WHEREFORE, defendant, Atwood & Morrill Co., Inc, hereby requests summary<br />

judgment in the above entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Q 3212, dismissing<br />

plaintiffs’ complaint against defendant, Atwood & Morrill Co., Inc, with prejudice in this action,<br />

and there being no opposition thereto,<br />

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against<br />

defendant, Atwood & Morrill Co., Inc, be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and<br />

without costs.<br />

Attorney for Defendant<br />

Atwood & Morrill Co., Inc<br />

MCGIVNEY & KLUGER, P.C.<br />

80 Broad Street-Suite 2300<br />

New York, New York 100<strong>04</strong><br />

(212) 509-3456<br />

SO ORDERED,<br />

Attorney for Plainti<br />

Raymond Carella and Edna Carella<br />

Weitz & Luxenberg, P.C.<br />

700 Broadway<br />

New York, New York IOOF \ le E<br />

(212) 558-5500<br />

9636PgU N n<br />

APB 2 6 ‘”’<br />

p$”\’d Y ORK<br />

CLERKS oFFd


SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK<br />

COUNTY OF NEW YORK<br />

IN RE: NEW YORK COUNTY<br />

! NYCAL<br />

ASBESTOS LITIGATION<br />

j I.A.S. Part 30<br />

\ (Heitler, J.)<br />

THIS DOCUMENT REFERS TO:<br />

j Index No.: 19<strong>04</strong>16/10<br />

LOWELL COOPER AND GRACIE COOPER,<br />

j<br />

-against-<br />

A. C. & S., INC., et al.,<br />

Plaintiffs,<br />

Defendants.<br />

i NO OPPOSITION<br />

j SUMMARY JUDGMENT<br />

i MOTION AND ORDER<br />

WHEREFORE, defendant, Aurora Pump Company, hereby requests summary judgment<br />

in the above entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules 0 3212, dismissing<br />

plaintiffs’ complaint against defendant, Aurora Pump Company, with prejudice in this action,<br />

and there being no opposition thereto,<br />

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against<br />

defendant, Aurora Pump Company, be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and<br />

without costs.<br />

ql? 7<br />

Dated: New York, New York<br />

(-LQ-Qh 0.<br />

Michelle D. Grady,Esq.<br />

Attorney for Defendant<br />

Aurora Pump Company<br />

Chqrles M. evWGp<br />

Attorney for Plaintiffs<br />

Lowell Cooper and Gracie Cooper<br />

MCGIVNEY & KLUGER, P.C.<br />

Weitz & Luxenberg, P.C.<br />

80 Broad Street-Suite 2300<br />

New York, New York 100<strong>04</strong><br />

New 700 Broadway York, New York 1000 FILED<br />

(212) 509-3456<br />

(212) 558-5500<br />

24iikkL<br />

APR 2 6 20<strong>11</strong><br />

SO ORDERED,<br />

YORK<br />

Hon. Sherry Klein Heitler<br />

APR I5 20<strong>11</strong><br />

i o o W<br />

ERKS OFFICE:<br />

N0038955-1


SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK<br />

COUNTY OF NEW YORK<br />

IN RE: NEW YORK COUNTY<br />

NYCAL<br />

ASBESTOS LITIGATION<br />

I.A.S. Part 30<br />

(Heitler, J.)<br />

THIS DOCUMENT REFERS TO:<br />

Index No.: 19<strong>04</strong>16/10<br />

LOWELL COOPER AND GRACIE COOPER,<br />

-against-<br />

A. C. & S., INC., et al.,<br />

Plaintiffs,<br />

Defendants.<br />

NO OPPOSITION<br />

SUMMARY JUDGMENT<br />

MOTION AND ORDER<br />

WHEREFORE7 defendant, National Boiler Works, Inc., hereby requests summary<br />

judgment in the above entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules 9 3212, dismissing<br />

plaintiffs' complaint against defendant, National Boiler Works, Inc., with prejudice in this<br />

action, and there being no opposition thereto,<br />

ORDEED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against<br />

defendant, National Boiler Works, Inc., be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and<br />

without costs,<br />

Dated: New York, New York<br />

417 ,20<strong>11</strong><br />

Matthew Attorney T. for Fairley, Defendant Esq.<br />

National Boiler Works, Inc.<br />

MCGIVNEY & KLUGER, P.C.<br />

80 Broad Street-Suite 2300<br />

New York, New York 100<strong>04</strong><br />

(212) 509-3456 (212) 558-5500<br />

j<br />

Attorney for Plaintiffs<br />

Lowell Cooper and Gracie Cooper<br />

Weitz & Luxenberg, P.C.<br />

700 Broadway<br />

New York, New York IO0<br />

NO03895 5- I


SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK<br />

COUNTY OF NEW YORK<br />

IN RE: NEW YORK COUNTY<br />

NYCAL<br />

ASBESTOS LITIGATION<br />

I.A.S. Part 30<br />

(Heitler, J.)<br />

THIS DOCUMENT REFERS TO:<br />

Index No.: 19<strong>04</strong>16/10<br />

LOWELL COOPER AND GRACIE COOPER,<br />

-against-<br />

A. C. & S., INC., et al.,<br />

Plaintiffs,<br />

Defendants.<br />

NO OPPOSITION<br />

SUMMARY JUDGMENT<br />

MOTION AND ORDER<br />

WHEREFORE, defendant, Columbia Boiler, hereby requests summary judgment in the<br />

above entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules 0 3212, dismissing plaintiffs’<br />

complaint against defendant, Columbia Boiler, with prejudice in this action, and there being no<br />

opposition thereto,<br />

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against<br />

defendant, Columbia Boiler, be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and without<br />

costs.<br />

Dated: New York, New York<br />

Lp ,20<strong>11</strong><br />

Attorney for Defendant<br />

Attorney for Plaintiffs<br />

Columbia Boiler<br />

Lowell Cooper and Gracie Cooper<br />

MCGIVNEY & KLUGER, P.C.<br />

Weitz & Luxenberg, P.C.<br />

80 Broad Street-Suite 2300<br />

700 Broadway<br />

New York, New York 100<strong>04</strong><br />

New York, New York I0003<br />

(212) 509-3456 (212) 558-5500<br />

N0038955-1<br />

2572-18<br />

APR 1520<strong>11</strong>1


SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK<br />

COUNTY OF NEW YORK<br />

IN RE: NEW YORK COUNTY<br />

ASBESTOS LITIGATION<br />

THIS DOCUMENT REFERS TO:<br />

LOWELL COOPER AND GRACIE COOPER,<br />

! NYCAL<br />

j I.A.S. Part 30<br />

! (Heitler, J.)<br />

j Index No.: 19<strong>04</strong>16/10<br />

!<br />

Plaintiffs, i NO OPPOSITION<br />

! SUMMARY JUDGMENT<br />

-against- j MOTION AND ORDER<br />

A. C. & S., INC., et al.,<br />

Defendants. !<br />

WHEREFORE, defendant, Oakfabco, Inc., hereby requests summary judgment in the<br />

above entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules 6 3212, dismissing plaintiffs'<br />

i<br />

I<br />

i<br />

complaint against defendant, Oakfabco, Inc., with prejudice in this action, and there being no<br />

opposition thereto,<br />

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against<br />

defendant, Oakfabco, Inc., be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and without<br />

Dated: New York New York<br />

417 ' ,20<strong>11</strong><br />

Robert Darish, Esq.<br />

Attorney for Defendant<br />

Oakfabco, Inc.<br />

MCGIVNEY & KLUGER, P.C.<br />

80 Broad Street-Suite 2300<br />

New York, New York 100<strong>04</strong><br />

(212) 509-3456<br />

chla h- k-5<br />

Attorney for Plaintiffs<br />

Lowell Cooper and Gracie Cooper<br />

Weitz & Luxenberg, P.C.<br />

700 Broadway<br />

New York, New York 10003<br />

(212) 558-5500<br />

2571-35<br />

N0038955-1


SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK<br />

COUNTY OF NEW YORK<br />

IN RE: NEW YORK COUNTY<br />

! NYCAL<br />

ASBESTOS LITIGATION<br />

j I.A.S. Part 30<br />

! (Heitler, J.)<br />

THIS DOCUMENT REFERS TO:<br />

j Index No.: 19<strong>04</strong>17/10<br />

DANIEL ZNK AND DOROTHY ZINK,<br />

A. C. & S., INC., et al.,<br />

Plaintiffs, i NO OPPOSITION<br />

i SUMMARY JUDGMENT<br />

-against- j MOTION AND ORDER<br />

Defendants.<br />

i<br />

WHEREFORE, defendant, Aurora Pump Company, hereby requests summary judgment<br />

in the above entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules 0 3212, dismissing<br />

plaintiffs' complaint against defendant, Aurora Pump Company, with prejudice in this action,<br />

and there being no opposition thereto,<br />

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against<br />

defendant, Aurora Pump Company, be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and<br />

without costs.<br />

Dated: New Y<br />

'<strong>11</strong>;<br />

k, New York<br />

,20<strong>11</strong><br />

Michelle D. Grady, Esq.<br />

Attorney for Defendant<br />

Aurora Pump Company<br />

MCGIVNEY & KLUGER, P.C.<br />

80 Broad Street-Suite 2300<br />

Attorney for Plaintiffs<br />

Daniel Zink and Dorothy Zink<br />

Weitz & Luxenberg, P.C.<br />

700 Broadway<br />

Q<br />

New York, New York I00<strong>04</strong> New York, New York 10003 \ E<br />

(212) 509-3456 (212) 558-5500<br />

1003-<strong>04</strong>33<br />

N0038955-1<br />

APR 15 20<strong>11</strong>


~ MD*"<br />

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK<br />

COUNTY OF NEW YORK<br />

IN RE: NEW YORK COUNTY<br />

NYCAL<br />

ASBESTOS LITIGATION<br />

I.A.S. Part 30<br />

(Heitler, J.)<br />

THIS DOCUMENT REFERS TO:<br />

Index No.: 19<strong>04</strong>17/10<br />

DANIEL ZINK AND DOROTHY ZINK,<br />

-against-<br />

A. C. & S., NC., et al.,<br />

Plaintiffs,<br />

Defendants.<br />

NO OPPOSITION<br />

SUMMARY JUDGMENT<br />

MOTION AND ORDER<br />

WHEREFORE, defendant, The Fairbanks Company, hereby requests summary judgment<br />

in the above entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules 6 3212, dismissing<br />

plaintiffs' complaint against defendant, The Fairbanks Company, with prejudice in this action,<br />

and there being no opposition thereto,<br />

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against<br />

defendant, The Fairbanks Company, be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and<br />

without costs.<br />

FILED<br />

APR 2 6 20<strong>11</strong><br />

Okwedeo N. Okoh, Esq.<br />

Attorney for Defendant<br />

The Fairbanks Company<br />

MCG~VNEY & KLUGER, P.C.<br />

80 Broad Street-Suite 2300<br />

New York, New York 100<strong>04</strong><br />

(212) 509-3456<br />

Attorney for<br />

Daniel Zink and Dorothy Zink<br />

Weitz & Luxenberg, P.C.<br />

700 Broadway<br />

New York, New York 10003<br />

(212) 558-5500<br />

- NEwYORK<br />

COUNTY CLERK'S OFFICE:<br />

LhM Plaintiffs h. hw7, q,<br />

SO ORDERED,<br />

5<strong>04</strong>-0679<br />

N0038955-1 . d


SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK<br />

COUNTY OF NEW YORK<br />

IN RE: NEW YORK COUNTY j NYCAL<br />

ASBESTOS LITIGATION<br />

j I.A.S. Part 30<br />

[ (Heitler, J*)<br />

THIS DOCUMENT REFERS TO:<br />

j Index No.: 19<strong>04</strong>23/10<br />

VOLKERT J. PETERS,<br />

-against-<br />

A, C. & S., INC., et al.,<br />

Plaintiffs,<br />

Defendants.<br />

i NO OPPOSITION<br />

j SUMMARY JUDGMENT<br />

i MOTION AND ORDER<br />

WHEREFORE, defendant, Columbia Boiler, hereby requests summary judgment in the<br />

above entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules $ 3212, dismissing plaintiffs’<br />

complaint against defendant, Columbia Boiler, with prejudice in this action, and there being no<br />

opposition thereto,<br />

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against<br />

defendant, Columbia Boiler, be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and without<br />

costs.<br />

Dated: New Yo k, New York<br />

q,’7 ,20<strong>11</strong><br />

I<br />

Carol M. Tempesta, Esq. ’<br />

Attorney for Defendant<br />

Columbia Boiler<br />

MCGIVNEY & KLUGER, P.C.<br />

80 Broad Street-Suite 2300<br />

New York, New York 100<strong>04</strong> New York, New York 10003<br />

(212) 509-3456<br />

SO ORDERED,<br />

Attorney for Plaintiffs<br />

Volkert J. Peters<br />

Weitz & Luxenberg, P.C.<br />

><br />

700 Broadway<br />

(212) 558-5500<br />

Hon. Sherry Klein Heitler<br />

2972-0028<br />

c,Qu@<br />

y\Ed YO@$ @O FF,G@<br />

CLE<br />

N0038955-1


SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK<br />

COUNTY OF NEW YORK<br />

IN RE: NEW YORK COUNTY<br />

! NYCAL<br />

ASBESTOS LITIGATION<br />

j I.A.S. Part 30<br />

! (Heitler, J.)<br />

THIS DOCUMENT REFERS TO:<br />

j Index No.: 19<strong>04</strong>23/10<br />

VOLKERT J, PETERS,<br />

A. C. & S., INC., et al.,<br />

Plaintiffs, i NO OPPOSITION<br />

j SUMMARY JUDGMENT<br />

-against- j MOTION AND ORDER<br />

Defendants.<br />

j<br />

WHEREFORE, defendant, Courter & Company, Inc., hereby requests summary<br />

judgment in the above entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules 6 3212, dismissing<br />

plaintiffs' complaint against defendant, Courter & Company, Inc., with prejudice in this action,<br />

and there being no opposition thereto,<br />

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against<br />

defendant, Courter & Company, Inc., be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and<br />

without costs.<br />

Dated: New Y rk, New York<br />

i,p1 ,20<strong>11</strong><br />

Attorney for Plaintiffs<br />

Volkert J. Peters<br />

MCGIVNEY & KLUGER, P.C.<br />

Weitz & Luxenberg, P.C.<br />

80 Broad Street-Suite 2300<br />

700 Broadway<br />

New York, New York 100<strong>04</strong><br />

New York, New York 10003<br />

(2 12) 509-3456 (212) 558-5500<br />

FILED<br />

APR 2 6 20<strong>11</strong><br />

SO ORDERED,<br />

Hon. Sherry Klein Heitler<br />

1 122-23870<br />

NEW 'I'ORK<br />

c~~~~ CLERKS OFFICE'<br />

N0038955-1


SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK<br />

COUNTY OF NEW YORK<br />

IN RE: NEW YORK COUNTY i NYCAL<br />

ASBESTOS LITIGATION<br />

j I.A.S. Part 30<br />

i (Heitler, J,)<br />

THIS DOCUMENT REFERS TO:<br />

j Index No.: 19<strong>04</strong>23/10<br />

VOLKERT J. PETERS,<br />

-against-<br />

A. C. & S., INC., et al.,<br />

Plaintiffs,<br />

Defendants.<br />

i NO OPPOSITION<br />

j SUMMARY JUDGMENT<br />

i MOTION AND ORDER<br />

WHEREFORE, defendant, Aurora Pump Company, hereby requests summary judgment<br />

in the above entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules 5 3212, dismissing<br />

plaintiffs' complaint against defendant, Aurora Pump Company, with prejudice in this action,<br />

and there being no opposition thereto,<br />

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against<br />

defendant, Aurora Pump Company, be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and<br />

without costs.<br />

Dated: New ork, New York<br />

42; ,20<strong>11</strong><br />

& !Kdb&Q-<br />

Attorney Michelle D. for Grady, Defendant Esq.<br />

3 8<br />

Attorney for Plaintiffs<br />

Aurora Pump Company<br />

Volkert J. Peters<br />

MCGIVNEY & KLUGER, P.C.<br />

Weitz & Luxenberg, P.C.<br />

80 Broad Street-Suite 2300<br />

700 Broadway<br />

New York, New York 100<strong>04</strong><br />

(212) 509-3456 (212) 558-5500<br />

1 L E D<br />

New York, New York IOOOF<br />

APR 2 6 20<strong>11</strong><br />

SO ORDERED,<br />

N0038955-1<br />

Hon. Sherry Klein Heitler<br />

NEW YQRK<br />

COUNT( CLERK'S OFFICE'<br />

1003-<strong>04</strong>34


SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK<br />

COUNTY OF NEW YORK<br />

IN RE: NEW YORK COUNTY<br />

! NYCAL<br />

ASBESTOS LITIGATION<br />

i I.A.S. Part 30<br />

i (Heitler, J.)<br />

THIS DOCUMENT REFERS TO:<br />

i Index No.: 19<strong>04</strong>23/10<br />

VOLKERT J. PETERS,<br />

A, C. & S., INC., et al.,<br />

Plaintiffs, i NO OPPOSITION<br />

j SUMMARY JUDGMENT<br />

-against- j MOTION AND ORDER<br />

Defendants.<br />

WHEREFORE, defendant, The Fairbanks Company, hereby requests summary judgment<br />

in the above entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules § 3212, dismissing<br />

plaintiffs' complaint against defendant, The Fairbanks Company, with prejudice in this action,<br />

and there being no opposition thereto,<br />

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against<br />

defendant, The Fairbanks Company, be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and<br />

without costs.<br />

Dated: New Y rk, New York<br />

lj97 ,20<strong>11</strong><br />

6kwedeo N. Okoh, Esq.<br />

Attorney for Defendant<br />

The Fairbanks Company<br />

MCGIVNEY & KLUGER, P.C.<br />

80 Broad Street-Suite 2300<br />

New York, New York 100<strong>04</strong><br />

(212) 509-3456<br />

SO ORDERED, 2<br />

N0038955-1<br />

kg~s, Es<br />

'%A6<br />

Attorney for Plaintiffs 9.<br />

Volkert J. Peters<br />

Weitz & Luxenberg, P.C.<br />

700 Broadway<br />

New York, New York 10003<br />

(212) 558-5500<br />

Hon. Sherry Kl& Heitler<br />

ILED<br />

APR 2 6 20<strong>11</strong><br />

5<strong>04</strong>-0678<br />

NEW YORK<br />

~ N T CLERK'S Y OFFICE]


SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK<br />

COUNTY OF NEW YORK<br />

IN RE: NEW YORK COUNTY<br />

NYCAL<br />

ASBESTOS LITIGATION<br />

I.A.S. Part 30<br />

(Heitler, J.)<br />

THIS DOCUMENT REFERS TO:<br />

Index No.: 19<strong>04</strong>23/10<br />

VOLKERT J. PETERS,<br />

-against-<br />

A. C. & S., INC., et al.,<br />

Plaintiffs,<br />

Defendants.<br />

NO OPPOSITION<br />

SUMMARY JUDGMENT<br />

MOTION AND ORDER<br />

WHEREFORE, defendant, Treadwell Corporation, hereby requests summary judgment in<br />

the above entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules 8 3212, dismissing plaintiffs'<br />

complaint against defendant, Treadwell Corporation, with prejudice in this action, and there<br />

being no opposition thereto,<br />

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against<br />

defendant, Treadwell Corporation, be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and<br />

without costs.<br />

Dated: New York, New York<br />

ql7 ,20<strong>11</strong><br />

Michele 1. Mittlekan, Esq.<br />

Attorney for Defendant<br />

Treadwell Corporation<br />

MCGIVNEY & KLUGER, P.C.<br />

80 Broad Street-Suite 2300<br />

New York, New York 100<strong>04</strong><br />

Attorney for Plaintiffs<br />

Volkert J. Peters<br />

700 Broadway<br />

New York, New York I0003<br />

(212) 509-3456 (212) 558-5500<br />

LpR 2 6 lo"<br />

SO ORDERED,<br />

1235-23500<br />

N0038955-1


SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK<br />

COUNTY OF NEW YORK<br />

IN RE: NEW YORK COUNTY<br />

NYCAL<br />

ASBESTOS LITIGATION<br />

I.A.S. Part 30<br />

(Heitler, J.)<br />

THIS DOCUMENT REFERS TO:<br />

Index No.: 19<strong>04</strong>23/10<br />

VOLKERT J. PETERS,<br />

-against-<br />

A. C. & S., INC., et al.,<br />

Plaintiffs,<br />

Defendants,<br />

NO OPPOSITION<br />

SUMMARY JUDGMENT<br />

MOTION AND ORDER<br />

WHEREFORE, defendant, George A. Fuller Company, hereby requests summary<br />

judgment in the above entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules 6 3212, dismissing<br />

plaintiffs’ complaint against defendant, George A. Fuller Company, with prejudice in this action,<br />

and there being no opposition thereto,<br />

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against<br />

defendant, George A. Fuller Company, be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and<br />

without costs.<br />

Dated: New Y rk, New York<br />

$7 ,20<strong>11</strong><br />

kdJ4 ludkh,, -<br />

Michele J. Mittledh, Esq.<br />

Attorney for Defendant<br />

George A. Fuller Company<br />

MCGIVNEY & KLUGER, P.C.<br />

80 Broad Street-Suite 2300<br />

New York, New York 100<strong>04</strong><br />

Volkert J. Peters<br />

Weitz & Luxenberg, P.C.<br />

700 Broadway<br />

New York, New York 10003<br />

FILED<br />

(212) 509-3456 (212) 558-5500 jpR 2 6 ZO’’<br />

SO ORDERED,<br />

Hon. Sherry Klein\ Heitler<br />

1224-0360<br />

Nf3iv WRK<br />

~ L E R<br />

couNn<br />

N0038955-1


SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK<br />

COUNTY OF NEW YORK<br />

IN RE: NEW YORK COUNTY<br />

NYCAL<br />

ASBESTOS LITIGATION<br />

I.A.S. Part 30<br />

(Heitler, J.)<br />

THIS DOCUMENT REFERS TO:<br />

Index No.: 19<strong>04</strong>23/10<br />

VOLKERT J. PETERS,<br />

-against-<br />

A. C. & S., INC., et al.,<br />

Plaintiffs,<br />

Defendants.<br />

NO OPPOSITION<br />

SUMMARY JUDGMENT<br />

MOTION AND ORDER<br />

WHEREFORE, defendant, Atwood & Morrill Co., Inc, hereby requests summary<br />

judgment in the above entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules 6 3212, dismissing<br />

plaintiffs' complaint against defendant, Atwood & Morrill Co., Inc, with prejudice in this action,<br />

and there being no opposition thereto,<br />

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against<br />

defendant, Atwood & Morrill Co., Inc, be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and<br />

without costs.<br />

Dated: New York New York<br />

q?' ,20<strong>11</strong><br />

Laura B. Hollman, Esf<br />

Attorney for Defendant<br />

Atwood & Morrill Co., Inc<br />

MCGIVNEY & KLUGER, P.C.<br />

80 Broad Street-Suite 2300<br />

New York, New York 100<strong>04</strong><br />

(212) 509-3456<br />

a<br />

\ -. #<br />

CMes N - teesoq ,&.<br />

Attorney for Plaintiffs<br />

Volkert J. Peters<br />

Weitz & Luxenberg, P.C.<br />

700 Broadway<br />

New York, New York 10003<br />

(212) 558-5500<br />

-<br />

SO ORDERED,<br />

N0038955-1<br />

963-237


I<br />

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK<br />

COUNTY OF NEW YORK<br />

IN RE: NEW YORK COUNTY<br />

ASBESTOS LITIGATION<br />

THIS DOCUMENT REFERS TO:<br />

VOLKERT J. PETERS,<br />

NYCAL<br />

I.A.S. Part 30<br />

(Hei tler, J .)<br />

Index No.: 19<strong>04</strong>23/10<br />

-against -<br />

A. C. & S., INC, et al.,<br />

Plaintiffs,<br />

Defendants.<br />

NO OPPOSITION<br />

SUMMARY JlJDGMENT<br />

MOTION AND ORDER<br />

WHEREFORE, defendant, Oakfabco, Inc., hereby requests summary judgment in the<br />

above entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules 6 3212, dismissing plaintiffs’<br />

complaint against defendant, Oakfabco, Inc., with prejudice in this action, and there being no<br />

opposition thereto,<br />

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against<br />

defendant, Oakfabco, Inc., be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and without<br />

costs.<br />

Dated: New Y rk, New York<br />

Y f7 ,20<strong>11</strong><br />

Attorney for Defendant<br />

Attorney for Plaintiffs<br />

Oakfabco, Inc.<br />

VolkeiJ. Peters<br />

MCGIVNEY & KLUGER, P.C.<br />

80 Broad Street-Suite 2300<br />

New York, New York 100<strong>04</strong><br />

Weitz & Luxenberg, P.C.<br />

700 Broadway<br />

New York, New York 1000<br />

(212) 509-3456 (212) 558-5500<br />

SO ORDERED,<br />

Hon. Sherry Klein keitler<br />

N00389SS-1


(fAv(i<br />

zp’<br />

,qPm<br />

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK<br />

COUNTY OF NEW YORK<br />

IN RE: NEW YORK CITY<br />

ASBESTOS LITIGATION<br />

STAN LEY KRAMEISEN,<br />

-against-<br />

ADIENCE INC. et al. including,<br />

FOSTER WHEELER CORPORATION,<br />

Plaintiffs,<br />

NYCAL<br />

I.A.S. Part 30<br />

Hon. Sherry Klein Heitler, J.S.C.<br />

Index No.: 19<strong>04</strong>29-2010<br />

NO OPPOSITION SUMMARY JUDGMENT<br />

MOTION AND ORDER<br />

Defendants.<br />

WHEREFORE, defendant FOSTER WHEELER, L.L.C. hereby request summary judgment in the<br />

above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212, dismissing plaintiffs’<br />

complaint against defendant FOSTER WHEELER, L.L.C. with prejudice, and there being no opposition<br />

thereto,<br />

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against defendant<br />

FOSTER WHEELER, L.L.C. be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and without costs.<br />

// jfi[7?tv/-+<br />

Dated/) New York, New York<br />

Ch istoph manelii, Esq.<br />

Wwxenberg, P.C.<br />

Att ey for Plaintffs<br />

700 Broadway<br />

New York, New York 10003 ,-.,<br />

n<br />

Sedgwick, Detert, Moran &Arn Id,<br />

Attorneys for foster Whedp.&<br />

Three Gateway Center, 12th Floor<br />

Newark, NJ 07102<br />

SO ORDERED,<br />

NEW YORK<br />

COUNTY CLERK‘S OFFICE


SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK<br />

COUNTY OF NEW YORK<br />

IN RE NEW YORK COUNTY ASBESTOS<br />

LITIGATION<br />

This Document Relates To:<br />

ISAAC RUBIN and SHEI[LA RUBIN,<br />

Index No.: 190008/<strong>11</strong><br />

NO OPPOSITION SUMMARY<br />

JUDGMENT MOTION AND<br />

ORDER<br />

Plaintiff,<br />

-against-<br />

AIR & LIQUID SYSTEMS CORPORATION, as<br />

successor by Merger to Buffalo PUMPS, Inc., et al,<br />

Defendants.<br />

WHEREFORE, Defendant, TUTHILL COWORATION, solely for<br />

Murray Turbine (“Defendant”), hereby request Summary Judgment in the above-entitled case,<br />

pursuant to Civil Practice’Law and Rules Section 32 12, dismissing Plaintiffs’ complaint against<br />

Defendant TUTHILL CORPORATION solely for Murray Turbine with prejudice, and there<br />

being no opposition thereto,<br />

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims<br />

against Defendant, be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and withqut<br />

ci<br />

** !eL.<br />

Belluck & Fox, LLP c/ Braaten & Pascarella, LLC<br />

Attorneys for Plaintiff(s)<br />

546 Fifth Avenue, qth Floor<br />

New York, New York 1003<br />

Attorneys for Defendant<br />

Tuthill Corporation solely for<br />

Murray Turbine<br />

(212) 681-1575 2430 Route 34<br />

Manasquan, New Jersey 08736<br />

(732) 528-8888<br />

SO ORDERED,<br />

Hon. Sherry K. Heitler<br />

APR 1520<strong>11</strong>


Hon. Sherry Klein Heitler<br />

JOSEPH MARTIN and DORIS MARTIN,<br />

- against -<br />

Plaintiffs,<br />

A.O. SMITH WATER PRODUCTS and<br />

PIRELLI CABLE CORPORATION, et al.<br />

Index No.: 190<strong>04</strong>3/<strong>11</strong><br />

NO OPPOSITION<br />

SUMMARY<br />

JUDGMENT MOTION<br />

& ORDER<br />

Defendants.<br />

WHEREFORE, defendant PRYSMIAN COMMUNICATIONS CABLES AND<br />

SYSTEMS USA, LLC, incorrectly sued herein as "PIRELLI CABLE CORPORATION"<br />

(hereinafter "PRY SMIAN"), hereby requests summary judgment in the above-entitled<br />

case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212, dismissing plaintiffs'<br />

complaint against defendant PRY SMIAN with prejudice, and there being no opposition<br />

thereto,<br />

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims<br />

against defendant PRYSMIAN be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and<br />

v&mL<br />

William T. Miedel, Esq.<br />

HARRIS BEACH PLLC<br />

Attorneys for Defendant<br />

PRYSMIAN COMMUNICATIONS<br />

CABLES AND SYSTEMS U<br />

(212) 681-1575 100 Wall Street<br />

New York, NY 1 P\<br />

SO ORDERED,<br />

RpR 2 6 20''<br />

p\,Evi YOPLK OFF \GE<br />

G@KS<br />

APR 1mfl


SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK<br />

COUNTY OF NEW YORK<br />

Joseph Martin and Doris Martin,<br />

Plaintiffs,<br />

-against-<br />

INDEX NO. 190<strong>04</strong>3/20<strong>11</strong><br />

NO OPPOSITION SUMMARY JUDGMENT<br />

MOTION AND ORDER<br />

A.O. Smith Water Products , et al.,<br />

Defendants.<br />

!<br />

. ,<br />

WHEREFORE, defendant Hawker Beechcraft Corporation, incorrectly sued herein as<br />

Raytheon Aircraft Company fMa Beech Aircraft Corporation, Inc., hereby requests summary<br />

judgment in the above entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules (i 3212, dismissing<br />

plaintiffs’ complaint against defendant Hawker Beechcraft Corporation with prejudice in this<br />

action, and there being no opposition thereto,<br />

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against<br />

defendant Hawker Beechcraft Corporation be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice<br />

and without costs.<br />

Dated:<br />

SO ORDERED:<br />

NN50957380. I<br />

Attorneys for Defendant Hawker Beechcraft<br />

Corporation<br />

Thomas M. Crispi<br />

Schiff Hardin LLP<br />

wb<br />

900 Third Avenue<br />

10022<br />

FlL - -<br />

APR 2 6 20<strong>11</strong>


So Ordered:<br />

--.


SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK<br />

COUNTY OF NEW YORK<br />

X<br />

ROGER H. CRIEGO,<br />

Plaintiffs( s)<br />

-V-<br />

Index No. 1 9006 1 - 1 1<br />

NO OPPOSITION<br />

SUMMARY JUDGMENT<br />

MOTION AND ORDER<br />

AERCO INTERNATIONAL, INC,, et al.<br />

Defendants.<br />

X<br />

Justice Sherry K. Heitler<br />

WHEREFORE, defendant Linde LLC, a Delaware limited liability company, formerly<br />

known as The BOC Group, Inc. and/or Airco, Inc. (collectively, "BOC") hereby requests<br />

summary judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section<br />

32 12, dismissing Plaintiff's complaint against defendant BOC with prejudice, and there being no<br />

opposition thereto,<br />

Ordered, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against<br />

defendant BOC be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and wFu\cd&,. E D<br />

Dated: New Yo& New York<br />

4#// ,20<strong>11</strong><br />

APR 2 6 20<strong>11</strong><br />

David Chandler, Ew.<br />

Attorneys for Plaintiffs<br />

700 Broadway<br />

New York, NY 10003<br />

(212) 558-5500<br />

ENTER: ,20<strong>11</strong><br />

u i n d e CLC<br />

soom<br />

New York, NY 10016<br />

(212) 452-5300<br />

Hon. Sherry KleidWeitler, J.S.C.<br />

APR 15 20<strong>11</strong>

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!