01.05.2014 Views

Jurisdiction and choice of law for non-contractual obligations ... - OAS

Jurisdiction and choice of law for non-contractual obligations ... - OAS

Jurisdiction and choice of law for non-contractual obligations ... - OAS

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

52<br />

contributory negligence <strong>of</strong> the victim; art. 1913 imposing strict liability (responsabilidad<br />

objetiva) <strong>for</strong> operators <strong>of</strong> dangerous instrumentalities).<br />

Ley Federal del Trabajo, Diario Oficial, Apr. 1, 1970.<br />

- Secondary Sources<br />

Boris Kozolchyk & Martin L. Ziontz, A Negligence Action in Mexico: An Introduction to<br />

the Application <strong>of</strong> Mexican Law in the United States, 7 ARIZ. J. INT’L & COMP. L. 1 (1989).<br />

ERNESTO GUTIÉRREZ Y GONZÁLEZ, DERECHO DE LAS OBLIGACIONES (12th ed. 1998) (ch.<br />

16 on illicit acts).<br />

JORGE VARGAS, MEXICAN LAW: A TREATISE FOR LEGAL PRACTITIONERS AND<br />

INTERNATIONAL INVESTORS (1998) (ch.21 describing a slowly-developing <strong>and</strong> still<br />

“underdeveloped” Mexican tort <strong>law</strong> not used nearly as much as the U.S. system <strong>and</strong><br />

observing at 210 that Mexican <strong>law</strong> does not allow <strong>for</strong> punitive damages <strong>and</strong> contributory<br />

negligence bars recovery, creating a strong incentive <strong>for</strong> plaintiffs to file cases in the<br />

U.S.).<br />

Margarita Trevino Balli & David S. Coale, Torts <strong>and</strong> Divorce: A Comparison <strong>of</strong> Texas<br />

<strong>and</strong> the Mexican Federal District, 11 CONN. J. INT’L L. 29, 44 (1995) (discussing role <strong>of</strong><br />

moral damages in Mexico).<br />

SALVADOR OCHA OLIVERA, LA DEMANDA POR DAÑO MORAL (2d ed. 1999).<br />

S.A. BAYITCH & JOSE LUIS SIQUEIROS, CONFLICT OF LAWS: MEXICO AND THE UNITED<br />

STATES; A BILATERAL STUDY 147 (1968) (noting that certain Mexican state civil codes,<br />

such the codes <strong>of</strong> Guanajuato, Puebla, Tlaxcala, <strong>and</strong> Zacatecas, do not track the<br />

national civil code exactly, lacking, <strong>for</strong> example, provisions <strong>for</strong> strict liability <strong>for</strong> operation<br />

<strong>of</strong> dangerous instrumentalities).<br />

2. Caribbean<br />

a. General<br />

GILBERT KODILINYE, TORT – TEXT, CASES & MATERIALS (1995) (discussing major causes<br />

<strong>of</strong> action <strong>for</strong> extra<strong>contractual</strong> liability under <strong>law</strong>s <strong>of</strong> the Caribbean Commonwealth).<br />

b. Specific <strong>Jurisdiction</strong>s<br />

i. Bahamas<br />

THE STATUTE LAW OF THE BAHAMAS, VOL. II, 1799-1987 (ch. 61 covering fatal accidents;<br />

ch. 62 covering libel; ch. 63 covering sl<strong>and</strong>er; ch. 64 covering accidental fires).<br />

ii.<br />

Dominica<br />

Transnational Causes <strong>of</strong> Action (Product Liability) Act, Act No. 16 <strong>of</strong> 1997, entered into<br />

<strong>for</strong>ce Jan 15, 1998 (section 8(2) providing <strong>for</strong> strict liability in cases involving<br />

manufacture, production, or distribution <strong>of</strong> products that cause harm or loss).

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!