Jurisdiction and choice of law for non-contractual obligations ... - OAS
Jurisdiction and choice of law for non-contractual obligations ... - OAS
Jurisdiction and choice of law for non-contractual obligations ... - OAS
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
60<br />
ANDREAS F. LOWENFELD, CONFLICT OF LAWS: FEDERAL, STATE, AND INTERNATIONAL<br />
PERSPECTIVES (1986).<br />
BRAINERD CURRIE, SELECTED ESSAYS ON THE CONFLICT OF LAWS 189 (1963).<br />
DAVID P. CURRIE, HERMAN H. KAY, LARRY KRAMER, CONFLICT OF LAWS: CASES,<br />
COMMENTS, QUESTIONS (6th ed. 2001).<br />
Larry Kramer, More Notes on Methods <strong>and</strong> Objectives in the Conflicts <strong>of</strong> Laws, 24<br />
CORNELL INT’L L. J. 245 (1991) (proposing adaptations to Currie’s traditional interest<br />
analysis approach).<br />
Michael H. Gottesman, Draining the Dismal Swamp: The Case <strong>for</strong> Federal Choice <strong>of</strong><br />
Law Statutes, 80 Geo. L. J. 1 (1991).<br />
Peter J. Meyer <strong>and</strong> Patrick J. Kelleher, Use <strong>of</strong> the Internet to Solicit the Purchase or Sale<br />
<strong>of</strong> Securities Across National Borders: Do the Anti-Fraud Provisions <strong>of</strong> the U.S.<br />
Securities Laws Apply?, at 3 (Mar. 1999) (on file with author) (observing that “[a]lthough<br />
the federal circuit courts <strong>of</strong> appeals agree that the anti-fraud provisions apply to some<br />
<strong>for</strong>eign securities transactions <strong>and</strong> conduct, they disagree over the test that should be<br />
used to determine when the anti-fraud provisions apply”).<br />
Robert A. Leflar, Choice-Influencing Considerations in Conflicts Law, 41 N.Y.U. L. REV.<br />
267 (1966).<br />
Robert Leflar, Conflicts Law: More on Choice Influencing Considerations, 54 CAL. L.<br />
REV. 1584 (1966).<br />
Russell J. Weintraub, At Least, To Do No Harm: Does the Second Restatement <strong>of</strong><br />
Conflicts Meet the Hippocratic St<strong>and</strong>ard?, 56 MD. L. REV. 1284, n.8 (1997)<br />
(characterizing Fornaris as ab<strong>and</strong>onment <strong>of</strong> lex loci delicti commissi in favor <strong>of</strong> dominant<br />
contacts).<br />
Scott M. Murphy, Note, North Dakota Choice <strong>of</strong> Law in Tort <strong>and</strong> Contract Actions: A<br />
Summary <strong>of</strong> Cases <strong>and</strong> a Critique, 71 N.D. L. Rev. 721 (1995).<br />
Symeon C. Symeonides, Choice <strong>of</strong> Law in the American Courts in 2002: Sixteenth<br />
Annual Survey at 61 (on file with author), citing Choice <strong>of</strong> Law in the American Courts in<br />
2000: Fourteenth Annual Survey, available at<br />
http://www.willamette.edu/wucl/wlo/conflicts/00survey/00survey.htm(chart <strong>of</strong> U.S. conflict<br />
<strong>of</strong> <strong>law</strong>s rules <strong>for</strong> torts).<br />
Symeon C. Symeonides, Proposal <strong>for</strong> New Provisions Relating to Tort Conflicts in a<br />
Restatement (Third) <strong>of</strong> Conflict <strong>of</strong> Laws, 75 IND. L. J. 437, 450-51 (2000).<br />
Symeon C. Symeonides, Louisiana’s Conflicts Law: Two ‘Surprises’, 54 LA. L. REV. 494<br />
(1994).<br />
Symeon C. Symeonides, Choice <strong>of</strong> Law in the American Courts in 1993 (And in the Six<br />
Previous Years), 42 AM. J. COMP. L. 599, 611 (1993).