01.05.2014 Views

CONVENTION RELATING TO THE STATUS OF ... - Refworld

CONVENTION RELATING TO THE STATUS OF ... - Refworld

CONVENTION RELATING TO THE STATUS OF ... - Refworld

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Article 26<br />

Freedom of movement<br />

Each Contracting State shall accord to stateless persons lawfully in its territory the right<br />

to choose their place of residence and to move freely within its territory, subject to any<br />

regulations applicable to aliens generally in the same circumstances.<br />

1. This article did not provoke any particular discussion in the Conference. However, the<br />

Dutch representative indicated that his Government wishes to reserve the right, for purposes of<br />

public order, to assign certain places of residence to stateless persons, while the representative<br />

of Turkey stated that the right of stateless persons to choose the place of their residence was<br />

contrary to Turkish law and his Government might therefore enter a reservation.<br />

The inclusion of this article was adopted by 16 votes to none, with 1 abstention. 179<br />

2. The intent of Article 26 is to assimilate stateless persons to “aliens in general”. This was<br />

considered sufficient because free residence and movement are ordinarily granted all aliens but<br />

in some cases certain restrictions may exist (for instance, they may need a special licence to<br />

move to overcrowded places or to go to restricted areas).<br />

As in the case of Article 18, the only requirement is that of being in the country legally, but,<br />

as explained in connection with Article 18, it depends on the status of aliens in the state<br />

concerned as to what rights stateless persons will enjoy under Article 26.<br />

A question which was raised in connection with Article 21 of the Ad Hoc Committee’s draft<br />

(which corresponds to this article) related to refugees who entered a country under a<br />

labour contract system or group settlement scheme which frequently required the refugees<br />

to give a pledge that they would remain in a particular job for a certain period of time.<br />

180 The view was expressed that such requirements do not conflict with freedom of<br />

movement. 181 It is to be assumed that the same is applicable to stateless persons who are<br />

not refugees.<br />

Article 27<br />

Identity papers<br />

The Contracting States shall issue identity papers to any stateless person in their territory<br />

who does not possess a valid travel document.<br />

1. There was quite a lively discussion in the conference on Article 27. Opinions differed<br />

regarding the persons to whom the papers should be issued, what these papers actually were<br />

and what their nature was. Some representatives felt that identity papers should not be issued to<br />

every state less person but only to those having a residence in the country. Others thought that a<br />

distinction should be made between identity papers which could be issued to anyone who<br />

happens to be staying in the country and travel papers which should be given to residents only.<br />

Still others felt that Article 27 referred to provisional identity papers only, as contrasted with final<br />

identity papers. There was no definite decision one way or another, 182 but the Australian and<br />

French representatives felt that the article as drafted by the Refugee Conference should not be<br />

changed and that it referred to both provisional and final papers.<br />

The article was approved by 18 votes to none with two abstentions. 183<br />

179 SR.8, p. 2.<br />

180 E/AC.32/SR.15, para. 80. Cf. Footnote 143 above.<br />

181 SR.11, p. 16. The provision of Article 26 would also not conflict with the special situation where stateless persons have<br />

to be accommodated in special camps or in special areas even if this does not apply to aliens generally<br />

182 The Yugoslav representative thought that it should be left for each country to interpret it according to its own legislation<br />

183 SR.8, pp. 2-4.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!