CONVENTION RELATING TO THE STATUS OF ... - Refworld
CONVENTION RELATING TO THE STATUS OF ... - Refworld
CONVENTION RELATING TO THE STATUS OF ... - Refworld
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
described in para. 2 than those imposed on aliens generally in the same position, for the same<br />
services.<br />
The documents to which para. 2 refers are those described in Articles 25 and 27, but may<br />
also include other documents if their issuance is permissible or required under the<br />
provisions of the Convention, for instance, proof of indigence under Article 16.<br />
Article 30<br />
Transfer of assets<br />
1. A Contracting State shall, in conformity which its laws and regulations, permit<br />
stateless persons to transfer assets which they have brought into its territory, to another<br />
country where they have been admitted for the purposes of resettlement.<br />
2. A Contracting State shall give sympathetic consideration to the application of<br />
stateless persons for permission to transfer assets wherever they may be and which are<br />
necessary for their resettlement in another country to which they have been admitted.<br />
1. This article was not among those which the Ad Hoc Committee had recommended for<br />
inclusion. Opposition toward the inclusion was raised by the Belgian representative who thought<br />
its provisions concerned primarily refugees and were not applicable to stateless persons. The<br />
British representative, however, pointed out that the words “in conformity with its laws and<br />
regulations” protected Contracting States from abuse; on the other hand, there may be instances<br />
where stateless persons would benefit from such a provision. He was supported by the Swiss and<br />
Norwegian representatives. The article was included in the Convention by a vote of 15 to none,<br />
with 5 abstentions. 212<br />
2. This Article imposes an obligation upon the Contracting States to permit the transfer of<br />
assets of stateless persons, provided these assets have been brought in by him and the transfer<br />
is made to another country where he has been admitted for resettlement. Thus no such obligation<br />
exists in cases where the stateless person leaves the country of his residence for a temporary<br />
stay abroad.<br />
The obligation is qualified by the words “in conformity with its laws and regulations”. These<br />
words do not free a Contracting State from its obligation to permit the transfer of assets<br />
referred to in para. 1, even if it generally prohibits transfers in favour of other aliens or<br />
nationals, since the obligation is of a categorical nature. These words were inserted to<br />
regulate the manner of the transfer. The above-quoted statement by the British<br />
representative referred to “abuses” only, meaning that the laws and regulations provide<br />
sufficient guarantee that only such assets will be exported which were actually brought in<br />
by the stateless person. In other words, the words just quoted require a stateless person to<br />
obtain a licence if such a document is required; they may militate against total transfer at<br />
once if amounts of such magnitude cannot generally be exported in one lump sum; the<br />
transfer in certain currency may be subject to restrictions or the transfer can be made only<br />
through the intermediary of a certain agency or a payment union, if this is a general rule,<br />
etc. A state, however, cannot refuse to permit the transfer if all such formalities are<br />
complied with, on the grounds of lack of foreign exchange or that other aliens or their own<br />
nationals do not enjoy the right of transfer. 213<br />
Paragraph 1 speaks of assets which a stateless person brought into the country of his<br />
residence. It is not necessary that the assets be brought in when the stateless person took<br />
up residence in the given country. The funds may have been sent into that country before<br />
he became a stateless person or before or after he took up residence there as such a<br />
person. In fact, the Refugee Conference dropped the words “with him” (in connection with<br />
212 SR.8, pp. 7-8.<br />
213 The Belgian representative in the Refugee Conference correctly stated that the purpose of this article was in fact to lift<br />
in the case of refugees the restrictions imposed on the transfer of assets (SR.13, p. 5).