Examiners' reports - June (PDF, 440KB) - OCR
Examiners' reports - June (PDF, 440KB) - OCR
Examiners' reports - June (PDF, 440KB) - OCR
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
<strong>OCR</strong> Report to Centres – <strong>June</strong> 2013<br />
4 Though this was not a popular option, this essay produced some of the best answers<br />
for the whole paper. Candidates mostly showed great enthusiasm for Archaic art in all<br />
its guises and in the better answers there was a real engagement with the concepts of<br />
‘regular’, ‘repetitive’ and ‘boring’. Answers were often lively and vigorous, with some<br />
criticism of the author of the comment as ‘ill-informed’, ‘ignorant’ and perhaps ‘rather<br />
boring themselves’. The most sophisticated answers dealt with the three adjectives<br />
separately rather than as a whole phrase; this meant that they could agree with one<br />
adjective whilst disagreeing with another. All the responses followed the rubric of<br />
discussing two areas of Archaic art, with many displaying an impressive knowledge<br />
across the three areas specified. Some candidates struggled to address the idea of<br />
their chosen examples being ‘regular’, but ‘repetitive’ and ‘boring’ were usually handled<br />
well, with the latter giving plenty of scope for personal response. As with all questions<br />
on this paper, there was a need for detailed reference to specific examples in order to<br />
achieve high AO1 marks.<br />
19