NUREG/CR-5625 (ORNL-6698) - Oak Ridge National Laboratory
NUREG/CR-5625 (ORNL-6698) - Oak Ridge National Laboratory
NUREG/CR-5625 (ORNL-6698) - Oak Ridge National Laboratory
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
ABSTRACT<br />
This report was prepared to provide support for major revisions to the current U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission decay<br />
heat rate guide entitled "Regulatory Guide 3.54, Spent Fuel Heat Generation in an Independent Spent Fuel Storage<br />
Installation," using a new data base produced by the SAS2H analysis sequence of the SCALE-4 system. The new data base<br />
of heat generation rates provides a significant improvement by increasing the number and range of parameters that<br />
generally characterize pressurized-water-reactor (PWR) and boiling-water-reactor (BWR) spent fuel assemblies. Using<br />
generic PWR and BWR assembly models, calculations were performed with each model for six different burnups at each of<br />
three separate specific powers to produce heat rates at 20 cooling times in the range of 1 to 110 y. A procedure that<br />
includes proper interpolation formulae for the tabulated heat generation rates is specified. Adjustment formulae for the<br />
235<br />
interpolated values are provided to account for differences in initial U enrichment and changes in the specific power of a<br />
cycle from the average value. Finally, safety factor formulae were derived as a function of burnup, cooling time, and type of<br />
reactor. The procedure included in this report was developed with the intention of providing one that was easier to use than<br />
that in the current Regulatory Guide. Also, the complete data base and procedure is incorporated into an interactive code<br />
called LWRARC which can be executed on a personal computer.<br />
The report shows adequate comparisons of heat rates computed by SAS2H/ORIGEN-S and measurements for 10 BWR and<br />
10 PWR fuel assemblies. The average differences of the computed minus the measured heat rates of fuel assemblies were<br />
–0.7 ± 2.6% for the BWR and 1.5 ± 1.3% for the PWR. In addition, a detailed analysis of the proposed procedure indicated<br />
the method and equations to be valid.<br />
iii<br />
<strong>NUREG</strong>/<strong>CR</strong>-<strong>5625</strong>