Hallux Rigidus

More documents

Recommendations

Info

Evidence for decisionmaking:Problematic • Lack of high quality studies • Different grading scales employed for both preoperative severity and postoperative function Preoperative Scales • Hattrup & Johnson • Coughlin & Shurnas • Regnauld Postoperative Function • Patient satisfaction • VAS • AOFAS score
AOFAS MTP Scale Pain Function Alignment
Page 1 and 2: HALLUX RIGIDUS Mostafa Benyahia Div
Page 3 and 4: Hallux Rigidus Definition • Arthr
Page 5 and 6: Clinical Features H.R. • Painful,
Page 7 and 8: Grading (Hattrup & Johnson) • Gra
Page 9 and 10: (Coughlin & Shurnas) • Grade 2 1
Page 11 and 12: Grading - Regnauld • Grade I - fu
Page 13: Treatment • Nonoperative • Oper
Page 17 and 18: Surgical Options
Page 19 and 20: MacKay et al (1997) Cheilectomy res
Page 21 and 22: Débridement/Cheilectomy • Grade
Page 23 and 24: Osteotomy: phalangeal/metatarsal
Page 25 and 26: Moberg Indications? • Running ath
Page 27 and 28: Metatarsal Osteotomies for Hallux R
Page 29 and 30: Arthrodesis: Contraindications (Cou
Page 31 and 32: Arthroplasty - Interpositional •
Page 33 and 34: Silicone Interpositional Arthroplas
Page 35 and 36: 1 ST MTP Total Joint Arthroplasty -
Page 37 and 38: Hemiarthroplasty - Implant • Biop
Page 39 and 40: HemiCAP DF(Arthrosurface) -new form
Page 41 and 42: Contraindications: HemiCap • Hx o
Page 44: DF Implant: Advantages • For the
Page 48 and 49: Toe DF Design • Compound articula
Page 51 and 52: FLEXOR HALLICUS BREVIS
Page 53 and 54: FAVOR VIGOROUS AND ADEQUATE SOFT TI
Page 55 and 56: UHZ Sports Medicine Institute Class
Page 57 and 58: CLINICAL RESULTS Arthrosurface Hemi
Page 59 and 60: 2010 Carpenter et al 32 patients wi
Page 61 and 62: Summary HemiCap • Addresses side
Page 65 and 66:
• 32 implants/30 patients • Gra
show all

Hallux Rigidus

Create successful ePaper yourself

Delete template?

Save as template?