12.05.2014 Views

Fiji Magistrates Bench Book - Federal Court of Australia

Fiji Magistrates Bench Book - Federal Court of Australia

Fiji Magistrates Bench Book - Federal Court of Australia

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

3 Intoxication must also be taken into account for determining whether the defendant had<br />

formed any intention, specific or otherwise, for <strong>of</strong>fences which, if intention were absent, he<br />

or she would not be guilty <strong>of</strong> the <strong>of</strong>fence: s13(4) Penal Code.<br />

• The question is whether the defendant’s mind was so affected by alcohol that he or she<br />

could not have formed the intention to do what he or she did or that his or her mind was<br />

so affected by alcohol that he or she did not know what he or she was doing at the time: R<br />

v Kenneth Iro (Unrep. Criminal Case No. 66 <strong>of</strong> 1993).<br />

• See R v Kauwai [1980] SILR 108, which considered the identical provision in the<br />

Solomon Islands.<br />

Intoxication under s13 Penal Code includes a state produced by narcotics or drugs: s13(5) Penal<br />

Code.<br />

The onus <strong>of</strong> pro<strong>of</strong> lies with the prosecution which in the case <strong>of</strong> intoxication, must prove beyond<br />

reasonable doubt that the defendant did know what he or she was doing or that it was wrong: R v<br />

Warren Godfrey Motui (Unrep. Criminal Case No. 20 <strong>of</strong> 1997).<br />

2.7 Immature Age: s14 Penal Code<br />

A person who is under the age <strong>of</strong> 10 is not criminally responsible for any act or omission: s14<br />

Penal Code.<br />

A person under the age <strong>of</strong> 12 is not criminally responsible for an act or omission, unless it is<br />

proved that at the time <strong>of</strong> the act or omission, he or she had the capacity to know that he ought<br />

not to do the act or make the omission: s14 Penal Code.<br />

A male person under the age <strong>of</strong> 12 is presumed to be incapable <strong>of</strong> having sexual intercourse: s14<br />

Penal Code.<br />

Evidence <strong>of</strong> age<br />

In cases where the defence <strong>of</strong> “immature age” is raised, evidence as to the child’s age should be<br />

given.<br />

The defendant should be able to point to some kind <strong>of</strong> evidence as to age, although the onus <strong>of</strong><br />

pro<strong>of</strong> is on the prosecution to show that such evidence ought to be excluded. See R v Rakaimua<br />

[1996] Criminal Case No. 24 <strong>of</strong> 1995.<br />

Capacity to know and understand for children between 10 and 12 years<br />

From R v Sheldon [1996] 2 CrAppR 50.<br />

<strong>Fiji</strong> <strong>Magistrates</strong> <strong>Bench</strong> <strong>Book</strong> April 2004

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!