14.05.2014 Views

1904 - 1913 - Parliament of New South Wales

1904 - 1913 - Parliament of New South Wales

1904 - 1913 - Parliament of New South Wales

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS
  • No tags were found...

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

,<br />

: XXyRi INDEX.<br />

1<br />

ASSEMBLY<br />

REFERENCES TO, THE N'O .'ES A1;D PROZEBaINGS, VOL.,1-22 :D I'Altl,]A,.~IE-NZT-SE ;St~ .1; 1911-19 VOLUMES . VOLUMES .<br />

VOL . I PAGE .<br />

I<br />

vo fl.<br />

PAGE .<br />

.<br />

.<br />

POINTS 014' ORDEB (continited):-<br />

RULINGS OF, MIL SPEAKFIL ON (continued)<br />

That lie could put a question for postponement <strong>of</strong> a motion <strong>of</strong> dissent from hi,.<br />

ruliu~, 8 .<br />

That a matter <strong>of</strong> privilege should take precedence over the Notice for Dissent<br />

from I*Mr . Speaker's ruling, 8 .<br />

That a motion to discuss an agreement in reference to the Office <strong>of</strong> Speaker wat<br />

out <strong>of</strong> Order, , there g no such agreement, 12 .<br />

That a nicition ' That bell) the Speaker's words be tak,:in down" was obsolete, an~<br />

thei-04)re out <strong>of</strong> order, 19 .<br />

That the House had no cognisance <strong>of</strong> what appeared in the Press, and tnerefor,<br />

a motiOn in reference to certain statements respecting the Honorable TAIeniber foi-<br />

Gordon' was not one <strong>of</strong> Privilege and was Out Of 01'ClCr, 19.<br />

That it wps not in order to discuss a motion dealing witil. the conduct Of thk<br />

Speaker, and motion was therefore out <strong>of</strong> order, 41 .<br />

That a motion under privilege. tilat the Speaker ji, reitising to allow the 1.1onorahl<br />

2N1enib6r for Bega to acidress the Rouse oil a motion then before the house<br />

dept-i-~ring him <strong>of</strong> his right <strong>of</strong> free speech, was oub <strong>of</strong> order, not being a niatte<strong>of</strong><br />

Priv,ilego, d7, 48, 4*J .<br />

That the Totalizator Bill did not constituto a tax on the revenue, and therefor,<br />

did noi require a M(`.;5age troni the Governor, and was in order, 83 .<br />

That a inotion which appeared on Vie 13tisiziess Paper and had lapsed,_co-,ild no<br />

be moved oil the sainy - clay as an anicuidiiient oil the Order <strong>of</strong> tile Dl, for Corn<br />

mittee 1,<strong>of</strong> \Vays and Means, as it had been cloalb will), 121 .<br />

That it was for the House to determine -whether a parzt-araph which appeared ii<br />

the Press should be read, 123 .<br />

That if tl* Honorable Member for Gordon (211r . lFade) had denied tli,3' stateincill<br />

niade in the The Daily Teleg ruph, headed " Mr. Speak,!r's Ruling--Mr . Wade'<br />

Complaint," the editor <strong>of</strong> the paper might then . have been animnoned : bu<br />

the Hoiliorable Member had owned tip to having used th3 words, and was nov<br />

makingj his defence, 124<br />

That lie would not at the then . stage direct a. Alember in reference to whom -a charge<br />

was being considered to withdraw from tho Chainber, although a preceden<br />

was beiAg created by his remaining, 194 .<br />

That the Ptiblic Works-and Closer Settlement Funds (Aiiiendmont) Bill was pro .<br />

pc ly b~foro the 11onse, .9-Itbougli referrhig to flie, Sinking, Fiind Penewlb<br />

Bill r not dien passed, and affecting the Government Railways Act without mention<br />

ill tile '111itle, 161 .<br />

That the re og ised leader <strong>of</strong> the House controlled the business <strong>of</strong> the House,4, an(<br />

could at 'any 'n tinm dii-ect that a motion be taken, 167.<br />

anip Duties (Amendment) Bill was strictly in -accordance With th,<br />

Ides-61 c, and was in order, 174 .<br />

'That the rdFoltition s'iispending portion <strong>of</strong> a Sessionn'l Orcler to pern.1,it <strong>of</strong> tb(<br />

discussion '<strong>of</strong> a notice <strong>of</strong> motion <strong>of</strong> General Business c6ntinuing after half-pas-i.<br />

7 o'clo* did not prevent any other business being proceeded with . 201 .<br />

That tile .practice established might be continued <strong>of</strong> Grinl,ing I - in a Public Work :<br />

Bill on the same day is the Resolution was passed that the, work bc Carried out<br />

222 .<br />

That a motion moved by a front bencher needed no -cconder, 203 .<br />

Tli:,t a motio4 to censure the Speaker would antici-pato debate on a similar motion<br />

notice <strong>of</strong>i which had been en-that one motion should be withdrawn anc~<br />

the. other, given precedence giv <strong>of</strong> other business . 207 .<br />

That the Housing Bill was not at variance with the Public Works Act, and tli(<br />

Public ~~,ervice Act, and was not out <strong>of</strong> Order . 226 .<br />

That the action <strong>of</strong> the Speaker could i-,ot bo questioned ,it qily tinie except 1),<br />

specific n~otion, but any Honorable Member might niovo'to dissent from tfio<br />

Speaker's' ruling, 231 .<br />

'That a motio I n to dissent from the Speaker's action in r3-nOVin.Z th-1 Flono-abl(<br />

Member f I or Darling Harbour was in orler, 231 .<br />

That the ]*ncqme Tax (Management) Bill was in order, although it referred to ar<br />

Act ~%,hich~i w-,is liot yet passed, 2-10 .<br />

That the Stat~ Coal Mines Bill wis not inconsistent with thn Government Railway',<br />

Act, was within the Order <strong>of</strong> Leave and was in erder 246 .<br />

That the'Stat6 Coal Mines Bill did not 'imend or contravene the Public Works Act<br />

and Nvas 11roperly before the Hoiise, 24.6 .<br />

That the Pai~ a,mmitar-Y Representatives Allowance Bill was 'in order, and th(<br />

point j'aised that it proposed a pecuniary benefit to every Member, whicl<br />

could not be held to be a matter <strong>of</strong> State policy, was not tenable, 277 .<br />

,That the motilon " That the Ronorable Meinl;er be not further lieaId " could b(<br />

inoveKI oil In 2A.ember Speaking in repl,v, 295 .<br />

That theJ.adJamentary Privileges Bill wa- an exercise <strong>of</strong> the powers coiiferr&<br />

by clause 5 <strong>of</strong>'the Constitution Act. and was in order, 296 .<br />

rlia~t . it whs in lorder to include many Bills in a motion for suspension <strong>of</strong> Standin,<br />

Order's to ena6le them to pass through all their stages in one day, 301 .<br />

POLICE :-<br />

Called into ass<br />

285 .<br />

RESIGNATIONS FR,<br />

114urn respect<br />

REDUCKD RAILWA<br />

MOti6ll Inacio (~<br />

Order to d<br />

POLICE MAGISTRA<br />

FORT KEMBLA (Se<br />

WORKS<br />

Serjoant-at-Arnis in removal <strong>of</strong> Member from Chamber, 33, 151<br />

TlIF FoRcr :-<br />

192 . . . . . . . . . . . . . .<br />

P~AI~CS ON<br />

. H011iS) for adjournment <strong>of</strong> the House under'thc 49th Standing,<br />

iiss, and ruled out (if order, 276 .<br />

'IS (Seo~" PUBLIC SERVICE ") .<br />

" PARLIAMENTARY !S7ANDTNG 'COMMITTEE ON PUBLIC<br />

D " GOVERIN MENT ~BLUE MtTAL QUARRY ") .<br />

.31 S77

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!