15.05.2014 Views

Nepal Clean Home Delivery Kit: Evaluation of the Health Impact - Path

Nepal Clean Home Delivery Kit: Evaluation of the Health Impact - Path

Nepal Clean Home Delivery Kit: Evaluation of the Health Impact - Path

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Definition <strong>of</strong> Infection<br />

The determination <strong>of</strong> cord infection was based on both <strong>the</strong> mo<strong>the</strong>r’s report during <strong>the</strong><br />

interview (including selection <strong>of</strong> a photo from an array <strong>of</strong> color photos <strong>of</strong> cords) and <strong>the</strong><br />

interviewer’s observation <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> umbilicus at <strong>the</strong> time <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> interview. It is clear from<br />

Table 7 that those defined as having “likely” or “possible” infection were substantially<br />

different from those defined as not infected. Cord-specific questions differentiate better<br />

than general baby symptoms like fever or poor sucking. “Foul smell” was weakly<br />

correlated with discharge (r=.323), photo (r=.328) and interviewer observation (r=.296),<br />

but discharge and photo were strongly correlated with interviewer observation (r=.521<br />

and .655) and with diagnosis <strong>of</strong> likely infection (r=.602 and .737). The factor most<br />

strongly correlated with diagnosis <strong>of</strong> likely cord infection was interviewer observation <strong>of</strong><br />

signs <strong>of</strong> infection (r=.839).<br />

Table 7. Defining features <strong>of</strong> infection cases<br />

Mo<strong>the</strong>r’s report:<br />

Cord:<br />

LIKELY<br />

CORD INFECTION<br />

POSSIBLE<br />

CORD INFECTION<br />

None Likely None Possible<br />

Col %<br />

(n=1389)<br />

Col %<br />

(n=271)<br />

Col %<br />

(n=1300)<br />

Col %<br />

(n=360)<br />

Foul smell 2.0 32.9 0.9 28.7<br />

Blood or pus discharge 3.0 55.0 0.5 51.4<br />

Infected (using photo) 5.1 80.8 0.8 77.5<br />

Baby symptoms:<br />

None 76.3 63.5 76.7 65.9<br />

Fever 7.2 8.2 7.2 7.8<br />

Spasm, stiff 3.1 9.5 3.1 7.8<br />

Poor suck 6.6 6.9 6.9 6.0<br />

Interviewer observation:<br />

Slight redness 3.0 10.0 1.2 14.9<br />

Infection, red, swollen<br />

1.0 78.1 0.0 62.6<br />

Definition <strong>of</strong> Comparison Groups within <strong>Kit</strong> Non-users<br />

Since so many kit non-users actually used new or boiled blades, it is necessary to define<br />

comparison groups that distinguish those using components similar to <strong>the</strong> kit from those<br />

who are not. The strongest associations between various kit components and infection<br />

were with <strong>the</strong> blade used for cutting and <strong>the</strong> cutting surface. Table 8 shows <strong>the</strong> infection<br />

rates associated with various combinations <strong>of</strong> blade and surface. There is relatively little<br />

difference between those using an old coin or nothing in each blade group (e.g., lightly<br />

shaded block for new blade), but <strong>the</strong> infection is considerably higher if some o<strong>the</strong>r cutting<br />

<strong>Nepal</strong> <strong>Delivery</strong> <strong>Kit</strong> <strong>Evaluation</strong> May 2000 14

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!