Nepal Clean Home Delivery Kit: Evaluation of the Health Impact - Path
Nepal Clean Home Delivery Kit: Evaluation of the Health Impact - Path
Nepal Clean Home Delivery Kit: Evaluation of the Health Impact - Path
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
most common in Siraha. The trained TBA was <strong>the</strong> most frequent one to recommend kit<br />
use in all three districts (40-52%), with health workers or<br />
Save <strong>the</strong> Children U.S. staff next (especially in Morang and Sunsari). Those who attended<br />
antenatal care were much more likely to have seen or heard <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> kit<br />
(76% vs. 55%). Of those who actually used a kit, though, <strong>the</strong>re was no difference between<br />
antenatal care attenders and non-attenders as to who advised <strong>the</strong>m to use <strong>the</strong> kit. In<br />
Morang and Sunsari, <strong>the</strong> trained TBA was <strong>the</strong> one most likely to have purchased <strong>the</strong> kit<br />
used, followed by <strong>the</strong> woman herself (Table 16). In Siraha, trained TBAs and family<br />
members were about equally likely to have purchased <strong>the</strong> kit. This was greatly influenced<br />
by who attended <strong>the</strong> delivery. Among those attended by a trained TBA, 61% were bought<br />
by <strong>the</strong> TBA herself, followed by <strong>the</strong> husband, and <strong>the</strong>n <strong>the</strong> woman herself as <strong>the</strong> next<br />
most common purchasers. Among those with an untrained TBA, <strong>the</strong> woman herself was<br />
<strong>the</strong> most likely purchaser (25%), followed by health workers, relatives, and husbands.<br />
Among those attended by family or neighbors, 37% <strong>of</strong> kits were bought by <strong>the</strong> woman<br />
herself, followed by health workers, family members, and trained TBAs as <strong>the</strong> next most<br />
common purchasers. When <strong>the</strong> birth was attended by a health worker, <strong>the</strong> health worker<br />
purchased <strong>the</strong> kit half <strong>the</strong> time and <strong>the</strong> woman herself was <strong>the</strong> next most common<br />
purchaser.<br />
In Morang and Sunsari, <strong>the</strong> kit was commonly purchased directly from <strong>the</strong> TBA (with no<br />
information as to where she got it), while in Siraha <strong>the</strong> pharmacy was <strong>the</strong> most common<br />
source. Very few were bought in retail shops. Again, it was influenced by who attended<br />
<strong>the</strong> delivery. Of those with a trained TBA, 56% bought <strong>the</strong>ir kit directly from <strong>the</strong> TBA.<br />
Those with an untrained TBA were equally likely to get <strong>the</strong>ir kit from a TBA, a female<br />
community health volunteer (FCHV) or a pharmacy. Those attended by family or a<br />
neighbor or friend were most likely to get <strong>the</strong> kit from a FCHV or health post. Those<br />
attended by a health worker were most likely to get <strong>the</strong> kit from <strong>the</strong> health post or from a<br />
TBA.<br />
In Morang and Sunsari, kits were most commonly bought one to three weeks before <strong>the</strong><br />
birth, while in Siraha almost half waited until less than a week before <strong>the</strong> delivery to buy<br />
<strong>the</strong> kit. In all three districts, about a quarter were brought by <strong>the</strong> attendant at <strong>the</strong> time <strong>of</strong><br />
labor.<br />
The price paid for kits varied considerably both within and between districts. In Siraha,<br />
74% paid Rs.20 or more for <strong>the</strong>ir kit, vs. only 31-33% elsewhere. Morang had <strong>the</strong> most<br />
free or subsidized kits (28% vs. 13-14%).<br />
25<br />
<strong>Nepal</strong> <strong>Delivery</strong> <strong>Kit</strong> <strong>Evaluation</strong> May 2000