Annexes - European Commission - Europa

More documents

Recommendations

Info

EVALUATION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMISSION’S SUPPORT TO THE REPUBLIC OF GUYANA EGEVAL for the provision of social benefits to local communities – This EQ assesses the extent to which interventions through the micro-projects programme have contributed to empowering Civil Society organisations and to improving the socio-economic conditions of local communities. EQ 6 - Efficiency of the overall Commission Country Strategy – This EQ assesses the extent to which the cooperation instruments and the financial, human and technical resources and processes have been used to achieve the required objectives in a timely and cost-effective manner. The question also addresses the role and commitment of the NAO Task Force in this respect. Institutional aspects of Strategy implementation will be considered in the context of the organisational structures of the GoG, the Commission and the project stakeholders. Issues related to institutional development and strengthening of capacity to overcome the brain drain problem will also be considered in this section. EQ 7 - Cross-cutting issues – This EQ seeks to address how far cross-cutting issues related to good governance and human rights, gender, protection of the environment, institutional development, capacity building and HIV/AIDS have been taken into account in the design and implementation of the programmes. EQ 8 – Coordination, Complementarity and Coherence – This EQ aims at appraising the extent to which the design and implementation of the Commission Strategy in Guyana has been fostered by appropriate application of the "3Cs" principles. Coherence applies both between Commission policies (in particular trade and CAP) and also in relation to the programmable (NIP, RIP) vis-à-vis non-programmable instruments (Sysmin, SAF, Budget Lines). Coordination between the Commission, the GoG and the donor community in designing and implementing its Country Strategy is also considered in the context of enhancing complementarity between the various programmes. In particular, coordination mechanisms with the IMF, IDB and WB will be considered. Given the diversity and financial weight of other instruments in the Commission’s interventions in Guyana, after deeper investigation the evaluation team slightly revised the intervention logic presented in the Inception Report so as to incorporate instruments unrelated to the planned strategy but designed to set the Commission intervention within the budget of the indicative programme. These other instruments have been taken into consideration in EQ 8 for their coherence with the identified strategy, and in EQ 6 to assess their contribution to the overall efficiency of programme implementation. Furthermore, interventions funded through these ‘non-programmable’ instruments can also be considered under EQs (3 and 5) concerned with the intervention sectors which they are specifically supporting, respectively the private sector and the general or sectoral budget. Where in-depth investigation of the documentation was found to necessitate unavoidable revision of the indicators, their replacement or adaptation is mentioned in the following section. Final Report – Volume II - Annexes – September 2008 Annex 6/ page 2
EVALUATION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMISSION’S SUPPORT TO THE REPUBLIC OF GUYANA EGEVAL Alignment of EQ with Evaluation Criteria Relevance Effectiveness Impact Sustainability Efficiency Cross-cutting Issues 3Cs EQ 1 Relevance EQ 2 Protection of coastal belt population EQ 3 Production capacity EQ 4 Social conditions EQ 5 Social benefits to local communities EQ 6 Efficiency of implementation EQ 7 Cross Cutting Issues EQ 8 Coordination, Complementarity and Coherence with other donors The Evaluation Questions in brief EQ1: EQ2: EQ3: EQ4: EQ5: EQ6: EQ7: EQ8: To what extent is the Commission Country Strategy in Guyana consistent with the priorities set by the GoG in its development policy? To what extent have Commission interventions contributed to the rehabilitation of Guyana’s sea defences and ultimately to sustainably protecting the livelihoods and dwellings of the coastal belt population? To what extent have Commission interventions contributed to private sector strengthening and ultimately to sustainably restoring and increasing Guyana’s production capacity? To what extent has Commission budget support contributed to the improvement of social conditions? To what extent have Commission interventions contributed to empowering Civil Society Organisations and ultimately to improving the socio-economic conditions of local communities? To what extent have the financial, human and technical resources been used to reach objectives in a timely and cost-effective manner and was the regulatory and administrative framework appropriate for doing this? To what extent has the support to the NAO Task Force contributed to reaching objectives in a timely and cost-effective manner? To what extent were cross-cutting issues related to good governance and human rights, gender, environment, institutional development, capacity-building and HIV/AIDS taken into account in the design and implementation of the programmes? To what extent has the Commission support to Guyana been fostered by the consideration of the “3Cs” principles? Final Report – Volume II - Annexes – September 2008 Annex 6/ page 3
Page 1: EVALUATION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMISSI
Page 5: EVALUATION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMISSI
Page 8 and 9: EUROPEAN COMMISSION EuropeAid Co-op
Page 10 and 11: 1. MANDATE Systematic and timely ev
Page 12 and 13: Forum of ACP States, Cariforum is h
Page 14 and 15: 4.1. Preparation Phase The evaluati
Page 16 and 17: • propose a list of activities, p
Page 18 and 19: • Key cross-cutting issues: for e
Page 20 and 21: ANNEX 1: KEY DOCUMENTS FOR THE EVAL
Page 22 and 23: ANNEX 2: OUTLINE STRUCTURE OF THE F
Page 24 and 25: ANNEX 4 COUNTRY OVERVIEW General Ba
Page 26 and 27: • Macro-economic support to socia
Page 28 and 29: Main Development Projects Top of pa
Page 30 and 31: EVALUATION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMISSI
Page 32 and 33: Evaluation of the European Commissi
Page 88 and 89:
EVALUATION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMISSI
Page 90 and 91:
Page 92 and 93:
Page 94 and 95:
Page 96 and 97:
Page 98 and 99:
Page 100 and 101:
Page 102 and 103:
Page 104 and 105:
Page 106 and 107:
Page 108 and 109:
Page 110 and 111:
Page 112 and 113:
Page 114 and 115:
Page 116 and 117:
Page 118 and 119:
Page 120 and 121:
Page 122 and 123:
Page 124 and 125:
Page 126 and 127:
Page 128 and 129:
Page 130 and 131:
Page 132 and 133:
Page 134 and 135:
Page 136 and 137:
Page 138 and 139:
Page 140 and 141:
Page 142 and 143:
Page 144 and 145:
Page 146 and 147:
Page 148 and 149:
Page 150 and 151:
Page 152 and 153:
Page 154 and 155:
Page 156 and 157:
Page 158 and 159:
Page 160 and 161:
Page 162 and 163:
Page 164 and 165:
Page 166 and 167:
Page 168 and 169:
Page 170 and 171:
Page 172 and 173:
Evaluation of the European Commissi
Page 175 and 176:
Page 177 and 178:
Page 179 and 180:
Page 181:
show all

Annexes - European Commission - Europa

Create successful ePaper yourself

Delete template?

Save as template?