19.05.2014 Views

PowerPoint Presentation (PDF) - Perfusion.com

PowerPoint Presentation (PDF) - Perfusion.com

PowerPoint Presentation (PDF) - Perfusion.com

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

A CASE REPORT:<br />

ECMO SUPPORT FOR FULMINANT<br />

MYOCARDITIS<br />

Dafne Andrea Chianella<br />

Division of Cardiovascular <strong>Perfusion</strong><br />

College of Health Professions<br />

Medical University of South Carolina


HISTORY OF MYOCARDITIS<br />

• Diagnostic Dilemma:<br />

• Shifting diagnostic criteria<br />

• Complex classification<br />

• Changing pattern of infectious disease<br />

• Consensus definition in 1984: “Dallas Criteria”<br />

• Defined by the American College of Cardiology<br />

• Used for the multicenter NIH myocarditis treatment<br />

trials<br />

• Remain standards histological classification


MYOCARDITIS: DEFINITION<br />

• Myocardial process characterized by the presence of an<br />

inflammatory infiltrate and myocyte damage or<br />

necrosis not typical of the myocardial damage of<br />

ischemic heart disease.<br />

Ventricular<br />

Dysfunction<br />

Cardiogenic Shock<br />

MYOCARDITIS<br />

Acute-Onset Heart<br />

Failure<br />

MI/Stroke<br />

Myocarditis is implicated in sudden cardiac death of<br />

young adults (8.6% to 12%)


• Chest pain<br />

• Arrhythmia<br />

SYMPTOMS<br />

• Shortness of breath, at rest or during physical<br />

activity<br />

• Fluid retention with swelling of legs, ankles and<br />

feet<br />

• Fatigue


CLASSIFICATION<br />

• Etiology<br />

• Ex: viral, bacterial, fungal, protozoal,<br />

parasitic, toxic, hypersensitive,<br />

immunologic syndrome<br />

• Histologically<br />

• Clinical <strong>Presentation</strong><br />

• Acute vs. Fulminant


PATHOLOGY OF MYOCARDITIS<br />

• Phase I: Viral Infection<br />

• Phase II: Autoimmunity<br />

• Phase III/IV: Dilated<br />

Cardiomyopathy<br />

Enterovirus<br />

(gut or respiratory tract)<br />

Coxsackieviruse<br />

Adenoviruses<br />

(respiratory tract)<br />

Encephalomyocarditis<br />

virus


Phase I: Viral Infection<br />

• Cardiotropic RNA virus enters host<br />

• Transported to target organ sites (ex. heart)<br />

• Co-receptors aid membrane binding (DAF and CD5 <strong>com</strong>plex)<br />

• Viral genome enters host cell via CAR (coxsackie-adenoviral<br />

receptor)<br />

• Protein<br />

translation


PHASE II: INFLAMMATION<br />

• Inflammatory cells infiltrate the myocardium<br />

• Cytokine release<br />

• (Ex. interferons, interleukins, tumor necrosis factor)<br />

• Macrophages, lymphocytes, and endothelial cell activation<br />

• Inflammatory mediators = myocarditis<br />

• Vascular endothelium disrupted:<br />

• Endothelial dysfunction<br />

• Vasoconstriction<br />

• Necrosis of myocardial tissues


PHASE III: CELL-MEDIATED IMMUNITY<br />

• Recruitment of immune cells to infected myocardium<br />

• T helper cells + cytotoxic T clear the virally infected cells<br />

• Activated T lymphocytes lysis virus-infected cardiomyocytes<br />

• Viral clearing<br />

• Detrimental effects:<br />

• Myocyte signal transduction<br />

• Calcium homeostasis<br />

• Cardiac bioenergetics


RESOLUTION:<br />

PHASE 4: RESOLUTION OR DILATED<br />

CARDIOMYOPATHY<br />

• Virus effectively cleared<br />

• Myocardial healing and<br />

recovery<br />

CARDIOMYOPATHY:<br />

• Persistent activation of T cells<br />

• Continued antibody-mediated<br />

myocyte destruction<br />

• Ventricular dysfunction<br />

• Fulminant myocarditis or<br />

Chronic persistent myocarditis<br />

• Fibrosis/ necrosis<br />

• Ventricular dilatation<br />

• End-stage heart failure.


FIGURE 1 PATHOGENESIS OF VIRAL MYOCARDITIS CAN BE DIVIDED INTO FOUR PHASE S


Case Report


HISTORY & PHYSICAL<br />

• 24 year old African American Female<br />

• Ht: 167.59 cm<br />

BSA: 1.75m²<br />

• Wt: 68.14 kg<br />

• Presented to ER<br />

• Chest pain X3 days<br />

• Fever, diaphoresis, nausea, vomiting<br />

• ST elevation<br />

• Troponin of 92.5 ng/mL on admission


LEFT HEART CATHETERIZATION<br />

• Normal coronary arteries<br />

• Diffuse left ventricular hypokinesis<br />

• EF = 25%<br />

• LVEDP 30mmHg


ICU AND RIGHT HEART CATH<br />

• VTach with loss of consciousness<br />

• Cardioversion with 200 joules and return to sinus rhythm<br />

• Amiodarone and Norepinephrine administered<br />

• Intermittent <strong>com</strong>plete heart block<br />

Right Heart Catheterization:<br />

• Placement precordial pacemaker and IABP<br />

• PCWP= 22 mmHg<br />

• PAP mean= 23 mmHg<br />

Echocardiogram:<br />

•Hypokinesis of the LV<br />

•EF= 25% to 40% depending on the heart rate


VA-ECMO REPORT:<br />

• Preoperative diagnosis:<br />

• Cardiogenic shock and myocardial stunning<br />

• Myocarditis with biventricular failure<br />

• Coagulopathy<br />

• Acute renal failure<br />

• 8,000 IU Heparin to pt<br />

• Pump primed with 2 units of PRBC, 1 unit FFP<br />

• Cannulation:<br />

• 23-French femoral venous cannula (right femoral vein)<br />

• 17-French arterial cannula (left femoral artery)


MUSC-ECMO<br />

•Equipment:<br />

•Stockert roller pump<br />

•Jostra Quadrox-D oxygenator w/ Safeline® coating<br />

•Gish biomedical circuit w/ GBS coating<br />

•Safety Devices:<br />

•Super Tygon tubing<br />

•Bubble detector<br />

•Transonic flow probe<br />

•Anti Factor Xa levels measured<br />

•Servoregulation:<br />

•Venous line pressure -40 mmHg<br />

•Arterial line pressure +350 mmHg


MUSC ECMO Circuit :<br />

Quadrox D<br />

Membrane Oxygenator


• Cardiac Stun:<br />

ECHO: DAY 1 OF ECMO<br />

• Third-degree heart block with ventricular<br />

paced rhythm.<br />

• Marked global LV hypokinesis<br />

• Paradoxical septal motion and some minor<br />

regional variability.<br />

• EF < 10%.<br />

• RV hypokinesis, mild hypertrophy.


ECHO: DAY 3 OF ECMO<br />

• Concentric left ventricular hypertrophy<br />

• Increased wall thickness<br />

• Increased myocardial mass index<br />

• Severe global hypokinesis of the LV<br />

• EF= 26%.


ECHO: DAY 6 OF ECMO<br />

• Trial Off- evaluate LV function after clamping<br />

ECMO.<br />

• Hypokinesis of the anterior wall, anterior<br />

septum, and inferior septum<br />

• EF increased to 52%.<br />

• RV function appeared recovered<br />

• After 60 minutes of clamping, there was no<br />

significant change in ventricular performance


ECHO: DAY 7 OF ECMO<br />

• EF= 55%<br />

• RV systolic pressure =14mmHg<br />

• Intraoperative removal of the left femoral<br />

ECMO cannula<br />

• Postoperative Diagnosis:<br />

• Fulminant Myocarditis


6<br />

14<br />

20<br />

34<br />

38<br />

46<br />

54<br />

62<br />

70<br />

82<br />

90<br />

102<br />

110<br />

118<br />

126<br />

134<br />

142<br />

150<br />

Anti-Xa Level (IU/mL)<br />

1.2<br />

Anti-Factor Xa Level on ECMO<br />

1<br />

0.8<br />

0.6<br />

0.4<br />

0.2<br />

0<br />

Hours on ECMO


Cardiac Index (l/min/m²)<br />

1<br />

9<br />

17<br />

25<br />

33<br />

41<br />

49<br />

57<br />

65<br />

73<br />

81<br />

89<br />

97<br />

105<br />

113<br />

121<br />

129<br />

137<br />

145<br />

153<br />

2.5<br />

CARDIAC INDEX ON ECMO<br />

2<br />

1.5<br />

1<br />

0.5<br />

0<br />

Hours on ECMO


fib (mg/dL) 215 191 208 229 233 306 377<br />

Plasma Free HGB<br />

(mg/dL) 40 40 90 100 40 30<br />

Lab Test Initiation Day 1 Day 2 Day 3 Day 4 Day 5 Day 6 Day 7<br />

PRBC units<br />

administered 2 1 2 2 2 0 4 2<br />

PLT units administered 1 0 0 0 0 1 2 1<br />

BUN (mg/dL) 41 81 92 67 51 53 47<br />

Creatinite (mg/dL) 2.4 4.8 5.3 3.5 3.3 3.5 3.5<br />

Average ACT (sec ) 200 210 195 175 160 175 180 185<br />

D-Dimer (mg/L) >20 >20 9.1 9.86 5.26<br />

AT3 % 69<br />

PT (sec) 30.3 26 18.3 18.4 17.3<br />

PTT (sec) 150 118 90 66 108 89 88<br />

INR 2.9 2.4 1.43 1.49 1.38


DISCHARGE<br />

• 8 days S/P ECMO ECHO:<br />

• EF= 69% with improved LV systolic<br />

function<br />

• Peak right ventricular systolic pressure is<br />

34 mmHg


EF (%)<br />

80<br />

Patient EF Through Hospital Course<br />

70<br />

69<br />

60<br />

50<br />

40<br />

30<br />

20<br />

25<br />

mean 33<br />

(25-40)<br />

26<br />

52<br />

55<br />

10<br />

0<br />

8


Day 1 on ECMO<br />

Discharge


CLINICAL PRESENTATION OF<br />

MYOCARDITIS<br />

Acute vs. Fulminant


FULMINANT: DEFINITION<br />

• Fulminant :<br />

• Any event or process that occurs suddenly and<br />

quickly<br />

• With intensity and severity to the point of<br />

lethality.<br />

The word <strong>com</strong>es from Latin fulmināre,<br />

to strike with lightning.


METHODS OF FM DIAGNOSIS<br />

• Echocardiography and EKG<br />

• Cardiac MRI<br />

• 67 Ga and 111 In antimyosin antibody<br />

scintigraphy,<br />

• Angiography<br />

• Biopsy


• FM:<br />

FM VS ACUTE<br />

• Fever and symptoms of heart failure<br />

• Distinct Prodrome (usually viral)<br />

• Severe cardiovascular <strong>com</strong>promise<br />

• Ventricular dysfunction that either resolves<br />

spontaneously or results in death.<br />

• Acute:<br />

• Patients present with established ventricular<br />

dysfunction<br />

• May respond to immunosuppressive therapy<br />

• May progress to dilated cardiomyopathy.


LABORATORY EVIDENCE FOR FM VS.<br />

ACUTE<br />

Lab Test<br />

Fulminant<br />

Non-Fulminant<br />

(Acute)<br />

Normal<br />

Creatinine 10.0±5.7 mmmol/L 6.4±3.6 mmol/L<br />

BUN 97.2±44.3 mol/L 79.6±26.5 mol/L<br />

Creatinine Kinase 1708±1217 U/L 617±447 U/L<br />

0.5 to 1.0 mg/dL<br />

7–21 mg/dL<br />

60 and 400<br />

IU/L<br />

Transaminases 1158±595 U/L 189±59 U/L 0.0-45 IU/L<br />

C-reative Protein 590±350 mg/L 340±260 mg/L


FM VS ACUTE<br />

Cardiac Test<br />

Fulminant<br />

Non-Fulminant<br />

(Acute)<br />

Inraventricular Conduction<br />

Delays 73% 25%<br />

Ventricular Arrhythmias 27% 4%<br />

Depressed Left Ventricular<br />

EF% 57% 41%<br />

Further FM lab evidence:<br />

• leukocytosis, eosinophilia, and erythrocyte<br />

sedimentation rate<br />

• troponins and creatinine kinase MB isoenzyme<br />

• Prolonged QRS <strong>com</strong>plex and depressed left ventricular EF


Fulminant<br />

Chronic<br />

HISTOLOGICAL CLASSIFICATION OF FM<br />

Normal<br />

Borderline


Fulminant<br />

Normal Cardiac Muscle<br />

Acute


LONG-TERM OUTCOME OF FULMINANT MYOCARDITIS AS<br />

COMPARED WITH ACUTE (NONFULMINANT) MYOCARDITIS<br />

ROBERTE, MCCARTHY (N ENGL J MED 2000;342: 690-5)<br />

Conclusions<br />

Fulminant myocarditis is a distinct clinical entity with an<br />

excellent long term prognosis. Aggressive hemodynamic<br />

support is warranted for patients with this condition.


MECHANICAL CIRCULATORY SUPPORT FOR<br />

PATIENTS WITH ACUTE-FULMINANT<br />

MYOCARDITIS<br />

(ANN THORAC SURG 2001;71:S73–6) 2001<br />

• An aggressive use of mechanical support is strongly justified.<br />

•Survival (full, BTR, or BTT) approaches 70%.<br />

•Transplantation can often be avoided.


EXPERIENCE AND RESULT OF ECMO IN<br />

TREATING FM WITH SHOCK:<br />

WHAT MECHANICAL SUPPORT SHOULD BE<br />

Conclusion:<br />

CONSIDERED FIRST?<br />

YIH-SHARNG CHEN, MD<br />

J HEART LUNG TRANSPLANT 2005;24: 81–7.<br />

ECMO can be considered the first-line treatment of<br />

mechanical support for FM when the IABP is inadequate or<br />

infeasible.<br />

• Fewer <strong>com</strong>plications<br />

• Easier application<br />

• Biventricular support


ADVANTAGES OF ECMO VS. VAD<br />

AS FIRST-LINE TREATMENT FOR FM<br />

• Easy and rapid setup without sternotomy<br />

• Suitable with CPR<br />

• Weaning to be attempted over several hours to days.<br />

• Bridge to long-term mechanical devices<br />

• Flexibility in ECMO application.<br />

• Cost


CONCLUSION<br />

Teamwork and aggressive treatment lead to the<br />

patients extraordinary recovery


QUESTIONS??


Initial Tn levels were elevated (21.8 11.9 ng/dl) in the patient group. The absolute level of Tn could<br />

not differentiate patients who would survive or not. Nevertheless, daily Tn level over the first 72<br />

hours clearly showed that patients with a steep decline in Tn (6.53 3.73, ranged from 2.494 to<br />

14.8, n 13) were able to be weaned off mechanical support (Figure 1). This finding may suggest<br />

that initially high Tn values do not necessarily indicate irreversible damage to the myocardium;<br />

rather, rapid decline in Tn slope may reflect early recovery of the myocardium. Conversely, initial<br />

Tn levels, even if not particularly elevated, might reflect irreversible damage of the myocardium<br />

without good prospects for recovery if they remain persistently elevated.<br />

Figure 1. Trend of daily troponin<br />

(Tn) levels.<br />

Patients 1 to 5 used Tn T, and the<br />

others used Tn I. There are similarities<br />

in the slope in reversible fulminant<br />

myocarditis, 6.53 3.73 ng/ml/day (n<br />

13;<br />

patient 12 with failed weaning and<br />

patient 10 with only one Tn datum<br />

were excluded from analysis).


Two-dimensional echocardiograms from patients with<br />

fulminant and acute myocarditis at presentation. The top<br />

panels show the parasternal long axis (A) and short axis<br />

(B) views of a 20-year-old man with fulminant myocarditis<br />

who presented after five days of a viral syndrome<br />

followed by acute hemodynamic collapse. Note the severe<br />

ventricular thickening (septal thickness 2.1 cm) but small<br />

ventricular cavity size (LVEDD 2.5 cm). After hemodynamic<br />

support with intravenous inotropic agents and a left ventricular<br />

assist device, this patient recovered near normal left<br />

ventricular function.<br />

Echo of normal heart –<br />

Parasternal View


#3 JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN<br />

COLLEGE OF CARDIOLOGY VOL. 36,<br />

NO. 1, 2000<br />

ECHOCARDIOGRAPHIC FINDINGS IN<br />

FULMINANT AND ACUTE MYOCARDITIS<br />

G. MICHAEL FELKER, MD,*<br />

CONCLUSIONS:<br />

Fulminant myocarditis is distinguishable<br />

from acute myocarditis by echocardiography.<br />

Patients with fulminant myocarditis exhibit a<br />

substantial improvement in ventricular function at six<br />

months <strong>com</strong>pared with those with acute myocarditis.<br />

Echo has value in classifying patients with<br />

myocarditis and may provide prognostic information.<br />

Figure 1. Echocardiographic findings in patients with fulminant and acute<br />

myocarditis at baseline and six months. (A) Fractional shortening, (B) left<br />

ventricular end-diastolic dimension, (C) septal thickness. *p , 0.01 vs.<br />

acute; †p , 0.01 for interaction between time and type of myocarditis.


This study demonstrated that 70% of patients with fulminant myocarditis supported<br />

by percutaneous ECMO could be saved. Cardiac function was severely<br />

depressed in the acute phase but improved markedly in the chronic phase. The<br />

clinical course in the chronic phase in the patientswith fulminant myocarditis<br />

who were weaned from ECMO was similar to that in patients with non-fulminant<br />

myocarditis.


FAVOURABLE CLINICAL OUTCOME IN PATIENTS WITH CARDIOGENIC SHOCK<br />

DUE TO FULMINANT MYOCARDITIS SUPPORTED BY PERCUTANEOUS<br />

EXTRACORPOREAL MEMBRANE OXYGENATION<br />

YASUHIDE ASAUMI<br />

EUROPEAN HEART JOURNAL (2005) 26, 2185–2192<br />

Figure 2:<br />

Acute changes in left ventricular function<br />

before and immediately<br />

after the support and at weaning from<br />

ECMO in patients with fulminant<br />

myocarditis (F group). (A) Fractional<br />

shortening (B) end-systolic dimentions.<br />

Open circles indicate patients who<br />

were weaned from ECMO and closed<br />

diamonds indicate F patients who were<br />

not weaned from ECMO and died.


• Myocardial Stunning and Hibernation<br />

• Acute, coronary occlusion causes a rapid decline (within seconds) in ventricular<br />

performance. If coronary flow is reestablished, ventricular function will slowly return to<br />

normal. The duration of reduced performance (myocardial stunning), depends on the<br />

duration of the preceding ischemia. Stunning is <strong>com</strong>pletely reversible, and therefore there<br />

is no permanent damage to the myocardium. The stunned myocardium, however, is less<br />

responsive to inotropic drugs and cardiogenic shock can result. Stunning is found<br />

following coronary angioplasty, thrombolysis, coronary vasospasm, and cardiopulmonary<br />

bypass.<br />

• Myocardial hibernation is a term used to describe the condition in which regional cardiac<br />

function is depressed due to chronic ischemia. Restoration of normal coronary flow (e.g.,<br />

by coronary bypass) will restore normal function in the affected region.<br />

• The mechanisms of stunning and hibernation are not <strong>com</strong>pletely understood, but there is<br />

evidence that it is related to impaired Ca ++ handling by the sarcoplasmic reticulum as well<br />

as due to damage caused by oxygen free radicals.


SPINALE IDEAS<br />

• Myocardial stanning<br />

• Dysfunction not death yet hybernating myocard


MAJOR ETIOLOGICAL CLASSIFICATIONS OF<br />

MYOCARDITIS<br />

Viral<br />

Bacterial<br />

Fungal<br />

Protozoal<br />

Adenovirus<br />

Coxsackievirus<br />

HCV<br />

HIV<br />

Mycobacterial<br />

Streptococcal species<br />

Mycoplasma pneumoniae<br />

Treponema pallidum<br />

Aspergillus<br />

Candida<br />

Coccidiodes<br />

Cryptococcus<br />

Histoplasma<br />

Trypanosoma cruzi<br />

Parasitic<br />

Toxins<br />

Hypersensitivity<br />

Schistosomiasis<br />

Larva migrans<br />

Anthracyclines<br />

Cocaine<br />

Interleukin-2<br />

Cocaine<br />

Sulfonamides<br />

Cephalosporins<br />

Diuretics<br />

Digoxin<br />

Tricyclic antidepressants<br />

Dobutamine<br />

Immunologic syndromes<br />

Churg-Strauss<br />

Inflammatory bowel disease<br />

Giant cell myocarditis<br />

Diabetes mellitus<br />

Sarcoidosis<br />

Systemic lupus erythematosus<br />

Thyrotoxicosis<br />

Takayasu’s arteritis<br />

Wegener’s granulomatosis


FIGURE 2.<br />

A CASE OF FULMINANT<br />

MYOCARDITIS, MANAGED<br />

USING INTRA-AORTIC<br />

BALLOON PUMPING AND<br />

MECHANICAL VENTILATOR,<br />

SHOWED THAT ON DAY 7<br />

WHEN THE CPK LEVEL<br />

PEAKED, TH1 DOMINANT<br />

POLARITY WAS<br />

DETECTED. IN THE<br />

HEALING PHASE, AT DAY<br />

14, T-CELLS WITH TH2<br />

FUNCTION DRAMATICALLY<br />

INCREASED AND<br />

OVERCAME TH1 T-CELLS.<br />

AT DAY 20, BOTH TH1 AND<br />

TH2 T-CELLS DECREASED.


SUGGESTED GUIDELINES FOR CASE REPORT PRESENTATIONS<br />

Speakers for each case report will be allotted a 30-minute period on the program. You should plan to spend 20 minutes for the<br />

case report followed by a 10-minute question and answer period guided by the session moderators. This 10 -minute period<br />

is an important part of the case report under discussion and will add to the overall quality of the information conveyed.<br />

Content (at presenters discretion) may be posted on International <strong>Perfusion</strong> Association (IPA) web site. IPA is a non -profit<br />

perfusion education organization. Please sign at bottom of abstract form to exercise this option. The following guidelines<br />

are re<strong>com</strong>mended from past experience to help you <strong>com</strong>municate most effectively.<br />

FORMAT<br />

• 1. Title and Introduction Each presenter should give a brief description of the case report and how it pertains to perfusion<br />

practice.<br />

• 2. Case Report The specific case should be described including: patient age, gender, and other pertinent demographics<br />

such as height, weight and body surface area, brief medical history, extracorporeal equipment and circuitry, operative and<br />

perfusion procedure, out<strong>com</strong>e and possible follow-up.<br />

• 3. Discussion This part could include evolution of the technique, history and bibliographic references. Additional experience<br />

or expansion of alternative techniques or results by other practitioners can be described. The discussion of problems,<br />

speculations or future suggested approaches should be included here.<br />

• 4. Conclusion A brief concluding statement summarizing the case with the major points should be described.<br />

• GENERAL GUIDELINES<br />

• Whenever possible, generic drug names should be used; doses of each drug should be stated when appropriate.<br />

Laboratory values should be expressed in proper units of measure. Extracorporeal equipment should be described (model<br />

number and manufacturer) to give the audience a frame of reference. Medical history of the patient should be brief and<br />

contain only information pertinent to the noteworthy aspects of the case report. The year the case was performed should be


CALL FOR ABSTRACTS<br />

ABSTRACTS FOR CASE REPORTS PRESENTATIONS SHOULD<br />

CONTAIN THE FOLLOWING INFORMATION:<br />

• TITLE: State the title of your presentation.<br />

• INTRODUCTION: Briefly describe the case and how it pertains to perfusion practice.<br />

• CASE REPORT: Include patient age, gender and other pertinent demographics such as<br />

height, weight and body surface area, brief medical history, extracorporeal equipment and<br />

circuitry, operative and perfusion procedure, out<strong>com</strong>e and follow-up (if available).<br />

• DISCUSSION: This may include evolution of the technique, history and bibliographic<br />

references, expansion of alternative techniques or results, problems, speculations or<br />

future suggested approaches.<br />

• CONCLUSION: The conclusion should summarize the main points.<br />

• QUESTIONS: Submit five questions that can be asked about your presentation at the<br />

Case Reports Meeting.


ABSTRACT<br />

Title: A case report: ECMO support for Fulminant Myocarditis<br />

Introduction:<br />

This case report describes the use of ECMO for biventricular support for a patient diagnosed with fulminant myocarditis (FM).<br />

Case Report:<br />

In this case study, we discuss a patient diagnosed with FM. A 25 year old woman present to the ER at MUSC hospital <strong>com</strong>plaining of three days of chest pain, nausea, and<br />

vomiting. She had a height of 167 cm, weighed 68 kg, and had a BSA of 1.75m². Upon admission and a diagnostic cardiac catheterization, her EF was 69%. After 21 days in the hospital, she was released to go home.<br />

Discussion:<br />

Fulminant myocarditis (FM) is caused by the inflammation of the myocardium that results in ventricular systolic dysfunction and acute-onset heart failure. Symptoms progress<br />

rapidly and are life threatening. Patients who are diagnosed with FM often die of sudden cardiac arrest, arrhythmias, or sever heart failure unless mechanical circulatory support is<br />

introduced. When patients are aggressively treated with biventricular support devices, there is a 70-75% of full recovery from FM. Heart transplantation can often be avoided.<br />

Conclusion:<br />

This paper presents the diagnostic and clinical aspects of an FM patient. A detailed account follows the clinical presentation, methods of diagnosis, patient management,<br />

treatment options, and the inevitable prognosis of FM. Lastly, the pathophysiological, histological, and electrophysical distinguishing features of FM are identified.<br />

Overall, the aggressive treatment, rapid mechanical support, and extraordinary collaboration of the heart team lead to the patient’s excellent recovery.<br />

Questions:<br />

1. Do other ventricular support devices provide the same results as ECMO?<br />

2. How many case of FM occur every year?<br />

3. How did ECMO effect the patient’s other organs?<br />

4. What are the<br />

5. How is FM classified from other forms of myocarditis?

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!