20.05.2014 Views

MatabelelandReport

MatabelelandReport

MatabelelandReport

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

REPORT ON THE 1980S DISTURBANCES IN MATABELELAND AND THE MIDLANDS<br />

Compiled by the Catholic Commission for Justice and Peace in Zimbabwe, March 1997<br />

PART ONE: A HISTORICAL OVERVIEW<br />

1.THE LEGACY OF THE SEVENTIES<br />

In the last 15 years much has been written about the liberation war and its legacies: it is not the intention of this brief<br />

overview to re-enter this complex subject in great depth. However, some understanding of the problems facing<br />

Zimbabwe at Independence helps elucidate the events that followed in the 1980s. For the purposes of this summary, the<br />

"Legacy of the 70s" will be dealt with as two-fold:<br />

A.The legacy of colonial rule, which included not only a vast array of repressive legislation, designed to silence political<br />

opposition at the expense of human rights, but also a number of personnel in the armed forces and the CIO, who had<br />

committed human rights abuses in the 1970s, and who were also ideally placed to work as double agents for South<br />

Africa in the 1980s.<br />

B.The legacy of antagonism between the two guerrilla armies, ZIPRA and ZANLA. Up until Independence, ZIPRA was<br />

the military wing of the political party, ZAPU, which was under the leadership of Joshua Nkomo, and ZANLA was the<br />

military wing of ZANU-PF, which was under the leadership of Robert Mugabe.<br />

A) THE LEGACY OF COLONIAL RULE.<br />

The new Prime Minister, Mr R. G. Mugabe, was highly acclaimed for his magnanimous speech at Independence, in<br />

which he agreed to "draw a line through the past", in order to achieve reconciliation of all parties involved. This speech<br />

did much to build up confidence in all those who were outside ZANU-PF. It also enabled the new nation to maintain<br />

economic stability and attract investment and aid from abroad. It was perceived as an important and laudible gesture.<br />

This speech had been preceded by the Amnesty Ordinance 3 of 1979 and the Amnesty (General Pardon) Ordinance 12<br />

of 1980, both of which had been passed during the interregnum of Lord Soames. These ensured that no prosecution<br />

could lawfully take place for any acts done either by members of the former Government or security forces or persons<br />

or forces acting in opposition to that Government.<br />

However, the policy of forgetting the past, as well as the general amnesties granted by the Governor during the<br />

interregnum before Independence, meant that those who had committed crimes and human rights abuses in the 1970s,<br />

were not made answerable for their actions. Many of the old Rhodesian guard resigned and emigrated after<br />

Independence. Others remained, and in many instances became key personnel within the ranks of the Zimbabwean<br />

forces and secret services. Here some personnel continued to commit human rights violations on behalf of the new<br />

government in the 1980s, before once more being granted immunity. The message to armed personnel first in Rhodesia<br />

and then in Zimbabwe has remained the same for two decades: you will seldom, if ever, be held accountable for your<br />

actions.<br />

Repressive legislation can be dated back to the beginnings of colonialism, with various pass laws, tax laws, land laws<br />

and a myriad of other racially biased laws, all of which served to ensure the economic and educational supremacy of a<br />

small white elite, which was never more than 6.2% of the population, at the expense of the black majority. These laws,<br />

their purposes and consequences have been dealt with at length by others. One of the main results of 90 years of<br />

colonial laws was that ordinary blacks came to see the law as their enemy:<br />

It never occurred to them to seek redress of their grievances through the courts. It was absurd.<br />

They knew it would be fruitless, that the deck was always stacked against them. Since then, that<br />

attitude toward the law has remained.<br />

Even where awareness of possible legal redress existed among victims of abuse in first the 1970s and then the 1980s,<br />

fear of further retribution was an over-riding factor in keeping people away from suing government agencies. In the<br />

1980s, ZAPU leaders who were well aware of their supposed legal rights, were being persecuted and were in hiding.<br />

37

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!