21.05.2014 Views

Extrinsic Curvature as Geodesics Deviation

Extrinsic Curvature as Geodesics Deviation

Extrinsic Curvature as Geodesics Deviation

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

i.e., Leibniz rule. And of course the operation d δ should be excluded from the wedge’s. We<br />

use a bracket on δ <strong>as</strong> d (δ) to express this fact explicitly.<br />

Before we continue, let’s introduce some notations<br />

C∑<br />

N µν = g µν − h µν =<br />

(I) ɛ (I) n (I) µ n ν . (22)<br />

I=1<br />

(I) N µν = N µν − (I) ɛ (I) n µ (I) n ν =<br />

C∑<br />

(J) ɛ (J) n µ (J) n ν . (23)<br />

J=1,J≠I<br />

We notice that (I) n ν (I) n ν = (I) ɛ = const along Σ, thus we have<br />

(<br />

d δ (I) n ν<br />

)<br />

(I)<br />

n ν = 0, (24)<br />

which implies<br />

d (I) δ n ν = hδ α ∇ α (I) n ν =<br />

=<br />

( )<br />

hδ α ∇ α (I) n µ<br />

( )<br />

hδ α ∇ α (I) n µ (h ν µ + N ν µ ) =<br />

g ν<br />

µ<br />

( ) (<br />

hδ α ∇ α (I) n µ h ν µ + (I) N ν<br />

µ<br />

)<br />

, (25)<br />

where we have used equation (24) in deriving the l<strong>as</strong>t equal sign. The above equation is of<br />

course just<br />

where we have defined<br />

d δ (I) n ν = (I) K δν +<br />

(IJ) B δ ≡<br />

C∑<br />

J=1,J≠I<br />

(J) ɛ (J) n ν (IJ) B δ , (26)<br />

(<br />

(J)<br />

n µ d δ (I) n µ<br />

)<br />

. (27)<br />

Overall, the above procedure is nothing but projecting d δ (I) n ν to the quantity lying on Σ<br />

and the quantity normalizing to Σ.<br />

Now we can use the fact<br />

and equation (26) to rewrite equation (21) <strong>as</strong><br />

K δµβ...ν = (1) K (δ)µ ∧ (2) n β ∧ ... ∧ (C) n ν<br />

... ∧ (J) n ν ∧ ... ∧ (J) n µ ∧ ... = 0, (28)<br />

+ (1) n µ ∧ (2) K (δ)β ∧ ... ∧ (C) n ν + (1) n µ ∧ (2) n β ∧ ... ∧ (C) K (δ)ν . (29)<br />

Again, when we do wedge, the δ is not affected. It is apparent that the terms above are<br />

linearly independent, thus K δµβ...ν is a tensor whose coefficients of linearly independent tensors<br />

are (I) K αβ . In another word, there is a one-to-one correspondence between K δµβ...ν and<br />

a set of (I) K αβ 4 . Therefore, NVP extrinsic curvature K δµβ...ν is equivalent to C quantities<br />

(I) K µν , which characterize extrinsic curvature under GEP.<br />

Now we can conclude that GEP and NVP are equivalent for any codimension.<br />

4 The above discuss can be clearer by the notation of [2], Actually this is how I found the way to solve it.<br />

In [2] tangent space and cotangent space are not distinguished (this is OK when metric tensor is defined on<br />

the manifold since metric defines an one-to-one map between tangent and cotangent space.) and vectors are<br />

4

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!