Extrinsic Curvature as Geodesics Deviation
Extrinsic Curvature as Geodesics Deviation
Extrinsic Curvature as Geodesics Deviation
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
i.e., Leibniz rule. And of course the operation d δ should be excluded from the wedge’s. We<br />
use a bracket on δ <strong>as</strong> d (δ) to express this fact explicitly.<br />
Before we continue, let’s introduce some notations<br />
C∑<br />
N µν = g µν − h µν =<br />
(I) ɛ (I) n (I) µ n ν . (22)<br />
I=1<br />
(I) N µν = N µν − (I) ɛ (I) n µ (I) n ν =<br />
C∑<br />
(J) ɛ (J) n µ (J) n ν . (23)<br />
J=1,J≠I<br />
We notice that (I) n ν (I) n ν = (I) ɛ = const along Σ, thus we have<br />
(<br />
d δ (I) n ν<br />
)<br />
(I)<br />
n ν = 0, (24)<br />
which implies<br />
d (I) δ n ν = hδ α ∇ α (I) n ν =<br />
=<br />
( )<br />
hδ α ∇ α (I) n µ<br />
( )<br />
hδ α ∇ α (I) n µ (h ν µ + N ν µ ) =<br />
g ν<br />
µ<br />
( ) (<br />
hδ α ∇ α (I) n µ h ν µ + (I) N ν<br />
µ<br />
)<br />
, (25)<br />
where we have used equation (24) in deriving the l<strong>as</strong>t equal sign. The above equation is of<br />
course just<br />
where we have defined<br />
d δ (I) n ν = (I) K δν +<br />
(IJ) B δ ≡<br />
C∑<br />
J=1,J≠I<br />
(J) ɛ (J) n ν (IJ) B δ , (26)<br />
(<br />
(J)<br />
n µ d δ (I) n µ<br />
)<br />
. (27)<br />
Overall, the above procedure is nothing but projecting d δ (I) n ν to the quantity lying on Σ<br />
and the quantity normalizing to Σ.<br />
Now we can use the fact<br />
and equation (26) to rewrite equation (21) <strong>as</strong><br />
K δµβ...ν = (1) K (δ)µ ∧ (2) n β ∧ ... ∧ (C) n ν<br />
... ∧ (J) n ν ∧ ... ∧ (J) n µ ∧ ... = 0, (28)<br />
+ (1) n µ ∧ (2) K (δ)β ∧ ... ∧ (C) n ν + (1) n µ ∧ (2) n β ∧ ... ∧ (C) K (δ)ν . (29)<br />
Again, when we do wedge, the δ is not affected. It is apparent that the terms above are<br />
linearly independent, thus K δµβ...ν is a tensor whose coefficients of linearly independent tensors<br />
are (I) K αβ . In another word, there is a one-to-one correspondence between K δµβ...ν and<br />
a set of (I) K αβ 4 . Therefore, NVP extrinsic curvature K δµβ...ν is equivalent to C quantities<br />
(I) K µν , which characterize extrinsic curvature under GEP.<br />
Now we can conclude that GEP and NVP are equivalent for any codimension.<br />
4 The above discuss can be clearer by the notation of [2], Actually this is how I found the way to solve it.<br />
In [2] tangent space and cotangent space are not distinguished (this is OK when metric tensor is defined on<br />
the manifold since metric defines an one-to-one map between tangent and cotangent space.) and vectors are<br />
4