21.05.2014 Views

PKD Otaku Issue 27 - Philip K. Dick Fan Site

PKD Otaku Issue 27 - Philip K. Dick Fan Site

PKD Otaku Issue 27 - Philip K. Dick Fan Site

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Now, there is in Markus’ Swiss Diploma Thesis one potentially<br />

fatal flaw, and that is the perverse “poseur” of<br />

postmodernism. Like a majority of other scholarly works<br />

about <strong>Philip</strong> K. <strong>Dick</strong>, Markus uses postmodernism with<br />

little specific effort to first justify its validity and viability,<br />

let alone to in turn apply it to<br />

Phil’s novels and stories. It seems<br />

to be yet again a given with unquestioning<br />

allegiance, as though<br />

found on a dusty rock shelf deep in<br />

a cave in France. Then, as Professor<br />

Frederick Crews, Professor Emeritus<br />

of English of the University of<br />

California, Berkeley, eloquently<br />

characterizes these purveyors of<br />

postmodernism, “…cockamamie<br />

commandos of correctitude,” proceed<br />

to engage in “…the desperate<br />

, self-important, theory-infatuated<br />

scramble to reach the top of an academic<br />

anthill.” (Postmodern Pooh,<br />

NY: North Point Press, 2004, pp.<br />

66-67; the best academic study of<br />

PoMo I’ve come across to date! Of<br />

comparable importance and quality<br />

is Yale Professor of Philosophy<br />

Keith DeRose’s long essay, “Characterizing<br />

A Fogbank,” posted in October<br />

2005 at the Certain Doubts<br />

website, available at: http://certaindoubts.com/?p=453<br />

) All this for a word that is a baffling<br />

combination of “post” (after) and “modo” (just now),<br />

and wasn’t first used in English until 1939, in two different<br />

ways, by the theologian Bernard Iddings Bell. (From Modernism<br />

to Postmodernism: An Anthology, Malden, MA.:<br />

Blackwell Publishing Ltd., 1996, p. 2)<br />

From Switzerland we now travel north, northwest for<br />

about 1,600 miles and end up at the<br />

hotbed of <strong>Philip</strong> K. <strong>Dick</strong> criticism, Iceland.<br />

Therein at the University of Iceland<br />

(situated in the heart of Reykjavik,<br />

the capitol of Iceland), in spring 1994,<br />

Hrafnhildur Blödal Hrafnkelsdóttir had<br />

her MA Thesis approved, titled Empathy<br />

Will Save Us – Eventually: A Reading<br />

Of Nine Novels By <strong>Philip</strong> K. <strong>Dick</strong>. (still<br />

available online at: http://www.krumma.net/MA-thesis/ma-thesis.pdf<br />

)<br />

The novels she includes in her 78 page<br />

study are: VALIS, The Divine Invasion, The Transmigration<br />

of Timothy Archer, Counter-Clock World, Ubik, The<br />

Three Stigmata of Palmer Eldritch, Do Androids Dream<br />

of Electric Sheep?, The Man in the High Castle, and A<br />

Scanner Darkly. Hrafnhildur also mentions three of Phil’s<br />

short stories: “Human Is,” “The Father-Thing,” and “Foster,<br />

You’re Dead.”<br />

She uses three important literary/critical perspectives<br />

with these works: narrative technique,<br />

characterization, and theme,<br />

seeking to demonstrate that:<br />

“…the pervading questions, occurring<br />

and recurring in<br />

novel after novel, are the questions<br />

“What is Human?’ and “What is<br />

Real?”. When it comes to humanity<br />

and reality there are no such concepts<br />

as correctness and incorrectness:<br />

correct human behavior does<br />

not exist;<br />

only human behavior. Whatever<br />

may be the origin of the universe,<br />

reality is only that which we experience<br />

in the daily struggle for survival.”<br />

(Empathy Will Save Us, 1994, p.<br />

69)<br />

In doing so she manages apt use of<br />

Aaron Barlow’s 1989 dissertation,<br />

Reality Religion and Politics in <strong>Philip</strong><br />

K. <strong>Dick</strong>’s Fiction, to support her<br />

astute critical observations. As she<br />

writes in her “Introduction,” “…I have to agree with Aaron<br />

John Barlow in saying that in the seventies, <strong>Dick</strong> reaches<br />

his climax, not only as a writer but as an original thinker<br />

whose vision knew no limits.” (ibid., p. 3)<br />

With respect to narrative technique, Hrafnhildur incisively<br />

notes Phil’s use of an open-ended narrative, mix of plots<br />

and sub-plots, use of humor, and most intriguingly a Raymond<br />

Chandleresque dialogue style.<br />

She writes, “Chandler’s prose is famous<br />

for its cynical dialogue where characters<br />

who are products of the Forties,<br />

speak hard-boiled slang. Conversations<br />

are often metaphoric, always innovative<br />

and very funny.” Then, “Moreover,<br />

<strong>Dick</strong> – like Chandler – always lets his<br />

protagonist have the last word. The<br />

last word is often a remark understanding<br />

the plight he is in and is his way of<br />

outwitting the opposition.” (ibid., p. 21<br />

in passim)<br />

What makes this even more fascinating is what Raymond<br />

6 ...the coyly sweet malevolence of the creature situated behind her table, dealing out trouble.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!