Untitled - Phoenix Sinclair Inquiry

More documents

Recommendations

Info

communities (including use of local workshops or interactive websites where MCH teams could receive evaluation guidance, support and training) SF-MCH PREPARING THE STAGE FOR A REGIONAL CONCEPTUAL FRAMEWORK The conceptual framework for SF-MCH is developed in an ongoing consultative process with communities. Consultation occurs through open lines of communication between communityand regional-based programmers, university-based research and evaluation team, AMC and FNIH. FNIH does not engage in form of opinion or decision-making, rather supports First Nation community and organizational direction of programming. Building on and tweaking the national guidelines for programming, SF-MCH developed their own Program framework and prepared the following guiding principles: Strength-based programming (building on community strengths) Family-centered service delivery Relationship focused programming Voluntary participation Grounded in First Nation culture and traditions Capacity building in the communities 34 | Manitoba First Nation Strengthening Families Maternal Child Health Pilot Project
The following diagram was developed collaboratially by AMC program staff, University of Manitoba, and MCH community representatives. The Roots of the tree represents the parallel relationship between program and evaultion that instrumental in guiding the development of the program through the formative five years. Evaluation planning meeting Nov. 2006. Manitoba First Nation Strengthening Families Maternal Child Health Pilot Project | 35
Page 2 and 3: Dr. Rachel Eni, Ph.D. | ASSISTANT P
Page 4 and 5: SF-MCH is counteracting the effects
Page 6 and 7: Visitor, Peguis), Geraldine Stevens
Page 8 and 9: Executive Summary 1 Recommendations
Page 10 and 11: Home Visitation 82 Training and Edu
Page 13: Nelson House Program family graduat
Page 16 and 17: These responsibilities of governmen
Page 18 and 19: The issue at the centre of all thes
Page 20 and 21: Nursing Services Nutrition and Phys
Page 22 and 23: DESCRIPTION OF THE MANITOBA FIRST N
Page 24 and 25: MANITOBA FIRST NATION STRENGTHENING
Page 26 and 27: MANITOBA INITIAL 16 SF-MCH COMMUNIT
Page 28: Goals and objectives of each of the
Page 33 and 34: The Maternal Child Health Program a
Page 35: Overtime, the desired outcomes for
Page 39 and 40: population in the North American ma
Page 41 and 42: of prenatal counselling. The 2002-0
Page 43 and 44: The dynamics of health are signific
Page 45 and 46: The goal of our work in interventio
Page 47: would be filtered into the program
Page 51 and 52: DEVELOPING A CULTURAL PRACTICE FRAM
Page 53 and 54: FAMILY LEVEL INDICATORS Relationshi
Page 55 and 56: UNDERSTANDING PARENTING IN MANITOBA
Page 57 and 58: Topic areas, i.e., interpersonal su
Page 59 and 60: care. Implementing strategies of su
Page 61: Within an Indigenous perspective, t
Page 65 and 66: DEVELOPMENT OF THE SF-MCH INFORMATI
Page 67 and 68: Manitoba First Nation Strengthening
Page 69 and 70: Manitoba First Nation Strengthening
Page 71: TECHNICAL ASPECTS The information s
Page 75 and 76: QUALITY ASSURANCE PROGRAM DESCRIPTI
Page 77 and 78: for intercommunity, regional and na
Page 79 and 80: CONTEXTUALIZATION OF SF-MCH WITHIN
Page 81 and 82: and community volunteers. Qualifica
Page 83 and 84: has laid substantial ground-work fo
Page 85 and 86: Standard #2 - determination and ext
Page 87 and 88:
that have full caseloads, this equa
Page 89 and 90:
Working with high-risk families Par
Page 91 and 92:
(Planning was comprehensive. It beg
Page 93 and 94:
B. Setting of thresholds - threshol
Page 95 and 96:
STEP SEVEN - CHOSE TEAMS The SF-MCH
Page 99:
Opaskwayak Cree Nation Family Fun D
Page 103:
Long Plain MCH Program Activity Opa
Page 106 and 107:
consistency of staffing of the SF-M
Page 108 and 109:
The average time per week spent on
Page 110 and 111:
Program staff shared that the major
Page 112 and 113:
LEVEL OF ABILITY In order to unders
Page 114 and 115:
SF-MCH Program staff were asked whi
Page 116 and 117:
STRENGTHS OF THE COMMUNITY Communit
Page 118 and 119:
FAMILY CHALLENGES Community members
Page 120 and 121:
Participants were then asked to sha
Page 122 and 123:
Overall non-participants who comple
Page 124 and 125:
“We like to try get to the famili
Page 126 and 127:
PERSPECTIVES OF PROGRAM IMPACT SF-M
Page 128 and 129:
Respondents to the community survey
Page 130 and 131:
In comparison with the effects of t
Page 132 and 133:
To the statement I feel connected t
Page 134 and 135:
The strength of the pilot run of SF
Page 136 and 137:
COMMUNICATION STRATEGIES Key to suc
Page 138 and 139:
KEY QUESTION 5: WHAT NEEDS TO BE DO
Page 140 and 141:
AWARENESS More program awareness. L
Page 142:
Have support to couples who have no
Page 147 and 148:
In the time period of the SF-MCH pi
Page 149 and 150:
epresents maternal and child health
Page 151 and 152:
The NPPA has been invited as well t
Page 153 and 154:
BIBLIOGRAPHY Anand, S, SS., Davis,
Page 155 and 156:
Hart, M. (2007). Cree ways of helpi
Page 157 and 158:
Stone, K.E., Burrell, L., Higman, S
show all

Untitled - Phoenix Sinclair Inquiry

Create successful ePaper yourself

Delete template?

Save as template?