PDF MAKE - City of Pismo Beach
PDF MAKE - City of Pismo Beach
PDF MAKE - City of Pismo Beach
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
<strong>of</strong> the property be made and then go<br />
owner f6r the property<br />
from there to negotiate<br />
with the<br />
Councilman Warren asked how long it would take to raise the<br />
other5000 through the construction fund Mr Jones estimated the<br />
amount per year to be 10 000 to 15 000 but that this was merely a<br />
guess as there was no historical background on this to really go on<br />
Councilman Crescione recommended that Council instruct the <strong>City</strong><br />
Administrator to hire someone to get an appraisal<br />
<strong>of</strong> the property<br />
Councilwoman Husemeyer suggested that they first accept the plan<br />
as submitted by Mr Merriam and Miss Dodd<br />
Upon motion by Councilwoman Husemeyer seconded by Councilman<br />
Crescione and upon roll call vote the Spyglass Park Plan was unanimousl<br />
approved<br />
Public Hearing<br />
Paul Geihs advised that the Building Inspector William George<br />
had reported that the fireplace and chimney at 167 Pier Street Don<br />
Neuman s Property had been torn down That Mr Neuman had secured a<br />
permit and regular inspections would be made Mr Geihs recommended<br />
that council drop the abatement proceedings at this time<br />
Upon motion by Councilman Warren seconded by Councilman Crescione<br />
it was<br />
unanimously approved to terminate abatement proceedings against<br />
Mr Don Neuman at this time<br />
Current Business<br />
Mr Jones advised that a condition had come up at the March 14<br />
1973 Planning Commission meeting where Atlas Bridges asked for and<br />
received a Use Permit to construct a 6 unit addition to an existing<br />
motel at 371 <strong>Pismo</strong> Avenue Stated that there was no provision<br />
in<br />
Ordinance 168 or 170 for an exemption for projects <strong>of</strong> this nature<br />
so a building permit would not be issued until the moratorium is<br />
lifted Mr London recommended that Ordinance 170 be amended to<br />
cover this situation<br />
Councilwoman Husemeyer felt that two things should be covered here<br />
that an amendment to Ordinance 170 would take some time and the <strong>City</strong><br />
was involved with a downtown study with Western Continental Developers<br />
Mr Bridge s motel is in the downtown area currently under study and<br />
Councilwoman Husemeyer suggested that Mr Geihs prepare an ordinance<br />
that would stop the building in the downtown area until the study has<br />
been completed<br />
Councilman Hargate concurred<br />
Councilman Crescione recommended that Council wait to see what<br />
happens with e new well and see what the downtown study presents that<br />
if the study pinpoints the area then they could consider stopping<br />
building<br />
Mayor Rooker stated that it did not appear that taking down 4 or 5<br />
buildings and replacing them with 5 or 6 would add to the water usage<br />
Attorney Geihs stated he felt the <strong>City</strong> already had two ordinances<br />
166 which requires that all<br />
building be in accordance with the general<br />
plan and 170 the Building Moratorium and advised another ordinance<br />
was not necessary<br />
Planning Commission Chairman Eugene Freer asked council to consider<br />
modifying Ordinance 170 so as to<br />
provide for replacement building that<br />
there are a number <strong>of</strong> substandard buildings in the area and if these<br />
buildings cantbe replaced the owners will not tear them down<br />
Councilwoman Husemeyer agreed the idea was sound but not for the<br />
downtown area and advised she would agree to an amendment to cover the<br />
replacing <strong>of</strong> buildings on a one for one basis if the downtown area was<br />
eMcluded Paul Geihs advised that this was not possible<br />
Mr Jones reported it would take approximately 60 days<br />
amendment to take effect that in approximately 30 days we<br />
what the<br />
water situation will be from the well<br />
for an<br />
should know