27.05.2014 Views

Police Perceptions of Maori - Rethinking Crime and Punishment

Police Perceptions of Maori - Rethinking Crime and Punishment

Police Perceptions of Maori - Rethinking Crime and Punishment

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

for <strong>Maori</strong> for non <strong>Maori</strong> Same Know<br />

% % % %<br />

Dealing with the general population 7 2 84 7<br />

Dealing with <strong>Maori</strong> <strong>of</strong>fenders 11 24 56 9<br />

Dealing with <strong>Maori</strong> victims 2 36 50 11<br />

Dealing with abusive comments<br />

about race or colour 34 4 50 13<br />

Dealing with deaths 41 9 39 11<br />

* Note: Percentages sum across rows. 'Don't Know' <strong>and</strong> 'No Responses' have been combined.<br />

Table 8 shows that there was overall agreement that dealing with the general<br />

population was equally easy or difficult for both <strong>Maori</strong> <strong>and</strong> non <strong>Maori</strong>. In dealing with<br />

<strong>Maori</strong> <strong>of</strong>fenders <strong>and</strong> victims, about half the respondents thought there was no<br />

difference but one in four said it was more difficult for non <strong>Maori</strong> to deal with <strong>Maori</strong><br />

<strong>of</strong>fenders <strong>and</strong> over a third thought it was more difficult for non <strong>Maori</strong> to deal with<br />

<strong>Maori</strong> victims. When dealing with abusive comments about race or colour, a half saw<br />

no difference but a third thought this was more difficult for <strong>Maori</strong> <strong>of</strong>ficers.<br />

And, <strong>Maori</strong> <strong>of</strong>ficers were seen as having greater difficulty in dealing with deaths by<br />

approximately 40% <strong>of</strong> respondents. Several respondents commented that it was hard<br />

for <strong>Maori</strong> to h<strong>and</strong>le situations involving a dead body. Some suggested that this was<br />

partly related to concerns about the need to respect <strong>Maori</strong> protocol when the death<br />

involved a <strong>Maori</strong> person. In contrast, the following quotes indicate some <strong>of</strong> the views<br />

about the advantages <strong>of</strong> being <strong>Maori</strong>:<br />

Knowledge <strong>of</strong> cultural issues, especially knowing <strong>Maori</strong> protocol about death,<br />

is important. This is especially so in working with <strong>Maori</strong> victims <strong>and</strong><br />

witnesses. It also makes for good communication in getting information that<br />

leads to solving <strong>of</strong>fences.<br />

Knowing whakapapa <strong>and</strong> tikanga can help you relate to people - it gives you<br />

an edge.<br />

<strong>Police</strong> <strong>of</strong>ficers' attitudes<br />

Two questions were designed to explore police <strong>of</strong>ficers' own views about <strong>Maori</strong>. The<br />

first group <strong>of</strong> 9 items asked about the extent respondents agreed with aspects <strong>of</strong><br />

current <strong>Maori</strong> aspirations. For technical reasons, responses to the second set <strong>of</strong> items<br />

have had to be discarded from the analysis. 12<br />

The responses to items reflecting possible <strong>Maori</strong> aspirations are listed in Table 9.<br />

12 The second set <strong>of</strong> 7 items were an attempt to parallel items from a scale developed in the US<br />

(the Modern Racism Scale; McConahay, 1986) which listed a number <strong>of</strong> items that might<br />

reflect the views <strong>of</strong> those opposed to <strong>Maori</strong> aspirations <strong>and</strong> which were, except for the first<br />

item, likely to be answered in the opposite direction from the first group. Although the spread<br />

<strong>of</strong> responses to the five point scale <strong>of</strong> agreement to these items was satisfactory, correlations<br />

between the two sets were mildly positive. This means that many <strong>of</strong> those who agreed to pro-<br />

<strong>Maori</strong> items also agreed to anti-<strong>Maori</strong> items. The only reasonable explanation for this is that<br />

many respondents continued to use the scale as if all the items were in the same direction <strong>of</strong><br />

positivity. Thus, the second set <strong>of</strong> seven items have been excluded from further analysis as the<br />

responses have to be regarded as unreliable.<br />

19

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!