The evaluation of pedestrian crossing safety

More documents

Recommendations

Info

The main deficiencies • Poor effectiveness of traffic lights, Missing pedestrians refuge islands in very long crossings sections (Crossing system) • Legal/illegal parking of vehicles impairing visibility, Poor maintenance of traffic signs and road markings (Daylight Visibility) • Poor lighting conditions and road marking visibility at night (Night‐time Visibility) • Lack of ramps / tactile paving, Obstacles reducing accessibility to visually impaired and disabled users (Accessibility) • Limited adoption of advanced technologies (countdown devices, etc.) -12-
-13- Some examples
Page 1 and 2: EPCA Programme: the evaluation of p
Page 3 and 4: Why a project on pedestrians in Eur
Page 5 and 6: What is NOT EPCA? • It’s not an
Page 7 and 8: EPCA: Cities tested in 2008 - 2009
Page 9 and 10: EPCA: How we tested • Test Areas
Page 11: • City dossiers • Overall ranki
Page 15 and 16: The “walk safe” campaign 1. The
Page 17 and 18: Conclusions Excellent experience of

The evaluation of pedestrian crossing safety

Create successful ePaper yourself

Delete template?

Save as template?