28.05.2014 Views

old quarrel between - School of Political Science and International ...

old quarrel between - School of Political Science and International ...

old quarrel between - School of Political Science and International ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

(Nietzsche, 1993: 73).<br />

The Birth <strong>of</strong> Western Metaphysics<br />

The central <strong>and</strong> ultimately quite simple error that is expressed by Plato’s<br />

Socrates is that he fails to recognize the skill <strong>of</strong> the poet to move beyond <strong>and</strong><br />

before ‘reason’. Indeed, that the poet has no skills at all, in contrast to<br />

cabinet makers, architects <strong>and</strong> physicians, is another way <strong>of</strong> presenting<br />

Socrates argument (Plato, 1987). In this section I will try to give an account<br />

<strong>of</strong> the skill <strong>of</strong> the poet.<br />

What skill is expressed in poetry? This question could be put; what techne is<br />

expressed in poiesis? This again, deploying widely accepted translations,<br />

could be written as; what skill or art is expressed in making or production?<br />

These series <strong>of</strong> questions, if we accept them as equivalent, suggest that there<br />

is a relationship <strong>between</strong> poetry <strong>and</strong> production. It is this kind <strong>of</strong><br />

underst<strong>and</strong>ing that appears to inform the Ion dialogue. That is, the physician<br />

produces health, the firelighter produces fire while the poet produces, well,<br />

nothing but passionate deceptions. The poet simply does not have the skills<br />

to produce anything ‘real’. If the poet claims to know what is right <strong>and</strong> good it<br />

must be a deception as the poet does not have the specific skills to actually<br />

produce anything. This underst<strong>and</strong>ing <strong>of</strong> the role <strong>of</strong> the poet is harmonious<br />

with the account given by Plato in The Republic where what is produced by<br />

God is the most real, followed by the thing produced by technites <strong>and</strong>, finally,<br />

the ‘representation’ produced by the poets, as Plato writes,<br />

So the tragic poet, if his art is representation, is by nature at third<br />

removed from the throne <strong>of</strong> truth; <strong>and</strong> the same is true <strong>of</strong> all<br />

other representative artists . . . The art <strong>of</strong> representation is<br />

therefore a long way removed from truth, <strong>and</strong> it is able to<br />

reproduce everything because it has little grasp <strong>of</strong> anything, <strong>and</strong><br />

that little is <strong>of</strong> a mere phenomenal appearance. For example, a<br />

painter can paint a portrait <strong>of</strong> a shoemaker or a carpenter or any<br />

Dialogue (2007) 5:1 33

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!