here - POPAI Australia & New Zealand
here - POPAI Australia & New Zealand
here - POPAI Australia & New Zealand
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
Contents<br />
Day One<br />
1. Integrating consumer, shopper<br />
and retailer objectives<br />
2. What is Shopper Marketing?<br />
3. The Shopper „Cycle‟ and its<br />
Dynamics<br />
4. Touchpoint Marketing &<br />
Messaging<br />
Day Two<br />
1. Shopper Behaviour Fundamentals<br />
2. Shopper Insights and what to do<br />
with them<br />
3. Measurement and ROI<br />
4. Integrating Shopper Marketing<br />
2
Caveats: „approaches‟ to SM, not „recommendations‟<br />
<strong>New</strong> discipline – all<br />
muddling along<br />
together<br />
No silver bullet<br />
SM has been<br />
spearheaded by<br />
grocery, hence many<br />
case studies are<br />
grocery<br />
Roundup of ideas and<br />
examples, not panacea<br />
Consumer/shopper<br />
line more blurry in<br />
some channels (eg<br />
P&C) and categories<br />
than others<br />
Ultimately the ceiling<br />
is retailers‟<br />
capabilities and<br />
focus<br />
3
But first, share your „homework‟ thoughts<br />
1. Who you are, w<strong>here</strong> you‟re from and what<br />
you do<br />
2. What you want out of this course<br />
3. Your favourite shop (may be online), and<br />
why<br />
4. What/who you think is local or global best<br />
practice shopper marketing, and why<br />
4
Who is considered overseas best practice? - 2010<br />
(From the 2010 <strong>Australia</strong>n Shopper Marketing industry study)<br />
Mostly USA and UK. More retailers than manufacturers mentioned.<br />
Tesco and WalMart the most frequently mentioned by a country mile.<br />
Manufacturers: similar players to those considered best practice locally.<br />
5
The US view: similar „suspects‟ as the top SM retailers<br />
(From the US Retail Leaders in the Shopper Experience)<br />
Source: RetailWire April 2010<br />
1.<br />
5.<br />
9.<br />
2.<br />
6.<br />
10.<br />
3.<br />
7.<br />
11.<br />
4.<br />
8.<br />
12.<br />
6
Who was considered <strong>Australia</strong>n SM best practice? - 2010<br />
(From the 2010 <strong>Australia</strong>n Shopper Marketing industry study)<br />
A significant minority - both in the online and in the interviews - said nobody in <strong>Australia</strong> was particularly<br />
good at it, and that <strong>Australia</strong> is behind the UK and USA by 5+years<br />
7
Top 10 <strong>Australia</strong>n best practice SM - 2011<br />
(From the 2011 <strong>Australia</strong>n Shopper Marketing industry study)<br />
1.<br />
5.<br />
9.<br />
(double the #2 ranked)<br />
2.<br />
6.<br />
10.<br />
3.<br />
4.<br />
7.<br />
8.<br />
•Many of the same<br />
suspects as for 2010<br />
•Often for the same<br />
reason if nominated<br />
twice<br />
•But different reasons<br />
from each other<br />
8
Other mentions – <strong>Australia</strong>n best practice SM - 2011<br />
(From the 2011 <strong>Australia</strong>n Shopper Marketing industry study)<br />
9
1. Integrating consumer, shopper<br />
and retailer objectives<br />
10
Module 1: Content Coverage<br />
Integrating consumer, shopper and retailer objectives<br />
1. Alignment of consumer, shopper and retailer objectives<br />
2. Using shopper and retailer objectives for promotions that<br />
work<br />
3. <strong>New</strong> Concept: The 5 WAY Retail Multiple<br />
4. Exercise: Match Promotional Mechanics to Shopper and Retail<br />
objectives<br />
5. Special: Glossary of retail terms (see Appendix)<br />
11
Introducing Key Retail Objectives<br />
• Frequency<br />
• IPI - Inter Purchase Interval<br />
• Basket Penetration & Incidence<br />
• Basket Size<br />
• Basket Value<br />
• AWOP – Average Weight of Purchase<br />
• Hurdle Rates / USP / AWS
Frequency<br />
The number of times your category is shopped<br />
over a defined period of time.<br />
• For example, you might shop for milk 3 X per week<br />
= 12 – 14 X per month, but shampoo only once a<br />
month<br />
• This will also depend on what kind of shopper and<br />
household type you are (how many people you are<br />
buying for and their level of consumption)<br />
• To drive category growth, the goal is to increase<br />
frequency<br />
• Relates to driving Traffic via repeat visits
IPI: Inter Purchase Interval<br />
The time between shopping trips to buy a<br />
category or product.<br />
• Changes according to category and channel type<br />
• Back to our milk and shampoo example: the milk<br />
might have an IPI of 2.5 days and shampoo 30<br />
days at the frequency level we described above<br />
• The goal <strong>here</strong> is the converse of Frequency (same<br />
concept but different lens) – we are trying to<br />
decrease IPI.
Basket Penetration & Incidence<br />
What % of shopper baskets your category or<br />
product goes into.<br />
• Some categories, eg staples like milk and bread,<br />
are in close to 100% of baskets<br />
• Other categories like pet food might only be in 15%<br />
of baskets<br />
• The objective <strong>here</strong> is to increase basket penetration
Basket Size<br />
How many items are in each shopper‟s „basket‟<br />
when they get to the checkout.<br />
• „Basket‟ <strong>here</strong> refers to total purchase<br />
• We want more items in the basket t<strong>here</strong>fore we<br />
want to increase basket size
Basket Value<br />
Total $ value of all items in the basket<br />
(sometimes called Transaction Value).<br />
• Common ways to increase this are<br />
encouraging the purchase of either more<br />
items or higher value items via various point<br />
of purchase marketing methods<br />
• This amounts to an increase in Spend
AWOP: Average Weight of Purchase<br />
Refers to number of items or weight in<br />
kilograms or litres.<br />
• A common retail goal is to increase AWOP<br />
• Often via multi-buys, 2 for offers and bulk<br />
packs<br />
• Also amounts to an increase in Spend
Hurdle Rates<br />
Sales per week of a given product / sku in a<br />
given store.<br />
• Also called AWS – Average Weekly Sales<br />
• Or USW – Units per store per Week<br />
• Retailers often have a minimum hurdle rate that a<br />
product has to achieved to stay stocked<br />
• This rate changes depending on the category<br />
and the channel (grocery and convenience<br />
hurdle rates higher than pharmacy, for example)
Which Retail Objectives do these talk to?<br />
PAGE 20
What about this one?<br />
PAGE 21
What about this one? Palmolive Winter Campaign<br />
• Situation: Need to communicate that<br />
Palmolive Antibacterial Handwash is<br />
effective in protecting people from the<br />
germs common in winter months<br />
• Idea: „Protection from Winter Germs‟<br />
• Activation: „Shelf back‟ necktag<br />
execution designed to fit within „clean<br />
store‟ guidelines but provide shelf<br />
standout. Other activations included<br />
sampling staff wearing scarves in-store<br />
talking to shoppers about the benefits<br />
of the product; in-store POS; ATL –<br />
print ads, TV<br />
22
Retail goals can conflict with or complement each other<br />
You need to decide which of the retail goals you are trying to achieve<br />
with a given activity. You can‟t have them all at once.<br />
• Frequency and AWOP are often in conflict. A promotion aimed at<br />
increasing Average Weight of Purchase will often simply bring sales<br />
forward and decrease frequency unless it is married with a strategy to<br />
increase consumption.<br />
• AWOP and Basket Value often complement each other. By increasing the<br />
number of items, weight and / or value of the items, Basket Value<br />
increases.<br />
• Frequency and Inter Purchase Interval are flip sides – if you increase one<br />
you decrease the other<br />
• So, how do you work out how it all relates together? The retail multiple…
Introducing the 5-Way Multiple<br />
Frequency<br />
Profit /<br />
margin<br />
Traffic<br />
Spend<br />
Incidence<br />
AWOP
The Five Way Multiple<br />
Increase home penetration via<br />
meaningful secondary display<br />
placement<br />
Increase average weight of purchase<br />
by expanding household portfolio of<br />
products and increasing frequency of<br />
use at home<br />
No of<br />
homes in<br />
<strong>Australia</strong><br />
Homes<br />
penetration<br />
Homes<br />
stocking<br />
Inter<br />
purchase<br />
interval<br />
weeks<br />
Purchases<br />
per year<br />
Av Value<br />
Average<br />
weight of<br />
purchase<br />
Estimated<br />
market value<br />
2 ltr Milk 8,000,000 85% 6,808,000 1.0 52.00 $3.75 1.10 $1,460,316,000 35% $511,110,600<br />
Opportunity 8,000,000 85% 6,800,000 0.9 57.78 $3.85 1.20 $1,815,146,667 35% $635,301,333<br />
124% $124,190,733<br />
GP%<br />
GP$<br />
Reduce inter-purchase interval with<br />
improved shelf presentation,<br />
signage and astute placement of<br />
secondary displays<br />
Increase average SKU value by taking<br />
emphasis off promotions away from<br />
price, trade customers up to premium<br />
or larger pack sizes via shelf layout,<br />
promotions and secondary displays<br />
24% increase<br />
in sales to<br />
$1.815b<br />
Increase in<br />
$ profit of<br />
$124m<br />
25
Implications for Promotions<br />
The retail objectives for your promotions<br />
need to be clear in the planning process.<br />
• Identify the key retail goals that help<br />
address the client problem / opportunity<br />
• Your promotional mechanic should be<br />
selected according to which retail goal it<br />
relates to<br />
CONDUCT EXERCISE.
Promotion Types and Mechanics<br />
Retail Promotions<br />
Consumer Promotions<br />
➟ Price off<br />
➟ Multibuys/2 fors<br />
➟ Bonus packs<br />
➟ Bigger size/extra free<br />
➟ Cross category<br />
➟ Win something –<br />
national/state based<br />
➟ Win in store (often product)<br />
➟ Buy and get (giveaways,<br />
merchandise, glassware)<br />
➟ Sampling & demonstrations<br />
➟ Events<br />
What else?
POP Quiz: Match the promo mechanic to the retail objective<br />
Exercise: Aligning Promotions<br />
Thinking about BluRay, and competitive 2/$50 promos…<br />
Retail Goal<br />
Promotion Mechanic<br />
Frequency<br />
Basket Penetration &<br />
Incidence<br />
AWOP/Basket Size<br />
Spend/Basket Value<br />
Traffic (aisle/store)<br />
Map at least one marketing type/promotion mechanic to each retail goal
Questions to ask yourself<br />
… when developing an activity brief<br />
Who is it for?<br />
Desired Shopper<br />
Outcome?<br />
Retailer Objectives<br />
‣ Loyal brand buyers ‣Frequency<br />
(AWOP/frequency based) ‣AWOP<br />
‣ Occasional buyers<br />
(frequency based)<br />
‣ <strong>New</strong> consumers (trial<br />
based)<br />
‣Increase spend<br />
‣Trial<br />
‣Brand switch<br />
‣Build loyalty<br />
‣Penetration<br />
‣Awareness<br />
‣Drive traffic<br />
‣Increase frequency<br />
‣Increase spend<br />
‣Improve basket<br />
penetration<br />
‣Increase AWOP
Marketing goals vs shopper & retail goals<br />
To get best traction, campaigns and promotions need to match back to shopper and retailer objectives.<br />
Consumer Shopper Retailer<br />
Past 24hour/7 day<br />
consumption<br />
Consideration set<br />
Brand preference<br />
Adoption scale<br />
Frequency<br />
Interpurchase interval<br />
Basket penetration<br />
Household penetration<br />
Switch vs incremental<br />
AWOP<br />
Spend<br />
Cross category purchase<br />
Category abandonment<br />
Time at shelf<br />
Hurdle rates<br />
Traffic/footfall<br />
Category growth<br />
GSR/NSR<br />
Transaction value<br />
Basket value<br />
Out of stocks<br />
Aisle abandonment<br />
Store dwell time
And a final thought ...<br />
• Herb Sorensen reckons the 3 shopping “currencies" are „time, money and angst‟<br />
• He further thinks the game is about getting them to spend more in their existing<br />
time in store, rather than try to extend their time in store<br />
• This is in contrast to some of the supermarket retailers‟ thinking about putting milk<br />
at the back of the store to make shoppers spend more time in store, traversing<br />
more aisles<br />
What do you think?<br />
PAGE 31<br />
Source: Sorensen, H: The Three Shopping Currencies, in ‘Shopper Marketing’, Markus Stahlberg Ed, Ville Maila, 2010 Pg63
Exercise: Integrating shopper into retail objectives<br />
1. Split into teams of approx 4-5 people<br />
2. Each team is decides a fun new product<br />
to launch (can be silly), matched to a<br />
retailer (this will be the centre of your<br />
application exercises for the rest of the<br />
day)<br />
3. Pick a retail objective (or one may be<br />
allocated per team, each one different)<br />
4. Teams to come up with a topline<br />
promotion for their product in their<br />
selected retailer, including the<br />
mechanic, to achieve that retail<br />
objective<br />
32 Exercise total time: 45 minutes
2. What is Shopper Marketing?<br />
What‟s in the toolbox?<br />
33
Module 2: Content Coverage<br />
What is Shopper Marketing?<br />
1. Evolution of Shopper Marketing<br />
2. Activities & Scope of Shopper Marketing - w<strong>here</strong> does Category<br />
Management fit?<br />
3. Shopper Marketing around the globe – Best Practice & examples<br />
4. Exercise: integrating Consumer & Shopper marketing vehicles<br />
34
What is SM? Not this<br />
Nor „category management‟ rebadged, nor „consumer promos‟ rebadged<br />
35
The story of Cat Man is part of the story of retailing…<br />
Markets of Trajan, 2nd century AD, comprising 150 shops, Rome, Italy<br />
The Owner-Operator model has been around for some time. What‟s happened?
How did we get to this?<br />
• 7,390 stores<br />
• 2 million employees<br />
• 14 countries<br />
• 200 million customers per<br />
year<br />
• China‟s 5 th largest customer<br />
(after 4 other countries)
Retailing was evolving rapidly in the 1980‟s<br />
Rapid advance<br />
of Information<br />
Technology<br />
Decline of brands &<br />
growth of own label<br />
High NPD<br />
failure rate<br />
Focus on<br />
operational<br />
efficiency<br />
Shoppers<br />
Static grocery<br />
market<br />
Increased price<br />
competition<br />
Retail market<br />
saturation &<br />
tightening of<br />
regulation<br />
Retailer<br />
concentration
Fewer and bigger retailers met fewer and bigger suppliers
How could these increasingly dominant companies<br />
continue to grow?<br />
• Retailers were managing their<br />
categories<br />
• How could large suppliers work more<br />
effectively with them?<br />
• „Category Management‟ coined by<br />
Brian Harris and Larry Hernandez<br />
in the mid-late „80s as part of the<br />
notion of looking at categories as<br />
business units<br />
• Went on to found The Partnering<br />
Group in 1990
TPG invented the 8 step process<br />
Review<br />
Definition<br />
Role<br />
Assessment<br />
Scorecard<br />
Strategy<br />
Tactics<br />
Implementation<br />
• This worked in<br />
bringing retailers and<br />
suppliers together<br />
(although funded by<br />
suppliers!)<br />
• Could be chart heavy<br />
and retrospective<br />
•Basic strategic planning<br />
and review process.
In Europe, ECR identified four pillars:<br />
Supply<br />
Demand<br />
Product<br />
Replenishment<br />
Promotions<br />
Range &<br />
Assortment<br />
<strong>New</strong> Product<br />
Introduction<br />
“Improving business effectiveness through the elimination of non value-added activities<br />
and their associated costs, and passing the benefits on to the customer, t<strong>here</strong>by improving<br />
customer satisfaction” ECR Europe<br />
Primarily about taking costs out of the supply chain
These became the thirteen ECR Initiatives<br />
Demand Management<br />
Strategy and<br />
Capabilities<br />
Optimise<br />
Assortment<br />
Optimise<br />
Promotions<br />
Optimise<br />
Introductions<br />
Intermediate<br />
Warehousing<br />
Reliable<br />
Operations<br />
Product Supply<br />
Continuous<br />
Replenishment<br />
Cross Docking<br />
Automated Store<br />
Ordering<br />
Enabling Technologies<br />
Electronic Data<br />
Interchange (EDI)<br />
Electronic Data<br />
Transfer (EDT)<br />
Item Coding and Database<br />
Management<br />
Activity Based<br />
Costing<br />
Still about taking costs out of the supply chain!
Nielsen refined this to 5 steps in 1992:<br />
Category<br />
Review<br />
Target<br />
Consumers<br />
Merchandise<br />
Planning<br />
Strategy<br />
Implementation<br />
Results<br />
Evaluation<br />
This is effectively „Cat Man Lite‟, with the 8 steps crammed into the Category Review<br />
Works for a while, but need to fully review the category to really understand the opps
None of it focused on the shopper!<br />
• Purpose was mostly about<br />
efficiencies for retailers and<br />
manufacturers, based on<br />
what sells<br />
• Tweaking of „yesterday‟ for a<br />
better today
Meanwhile, ECR has moved on:<br />
Demand Management<br />
Demand Strategy and Capabilities<br />
Collaborative Shopper Value Creation<br />
Enablers<br />
Common Identification Standards<br />
Electronic Message Standards<br />
Optimise<br />
Assortments<br />
Optimise<br />
Promotions<br />
Optimise<br />
<strong>New</strong> Product<br />
Introductions<br />
Global Data Synchronization<br />
Supply Management<br />
Supply Strategy and Capabilities<br />
Integrators<br />
Collaborative Planning and Forecasting<br />
Responsive<br />
Supply<br />
Integrated<br />
Demand<br />
Supply<br />
Operational<br />
Excellence<br />
Cost/Profit and Value Management
ECR scorecard today<br />
Demand Management<br />
Demand Strategy and Capabilities<br />
Collaborative Shopper Value Creation<br />
Enablers<br />
Common Identification Standards<br />
Electronic Message Standards<br />
Optimise<br />
Assortments<br />
Optimise<br />
Promotions<br />
Optimise<br />
<strong>New</strong> Product<br />
Introductions<br />
Global Data Synchronization<br />
Supply Management<br />
Supply Strategy and Capabilities<br />
Integrators<br />
Collaborative Planning and Forecasting<br />
Responsive<br />
Supply<br />
Integrated<br />
Demand<br />
Supply<br />
Operational<br />
Excellence<br />
Cost/Profit and Value Management<br />
Not just demand fulfilment, but demand creation too
8 step process revisited:<br />
Definition<br />
Role<br />
Review<br />
Assessment<br />
Scorecard<br />
Strategy<br />
Best Practice Benchmarking<br />
Category, Shopper & Consumer<br />
Insights & Trends<br />
In-store Vision Development<br />
Tactics<br />
Implementation<br />
The core of this process is<br />
still valid, although we can<br />
expand the scope
ECR Europe definition of Category Management<br />
“The strategic management of product groups<br />
through trade partnerships<br />
which aims to maximize sales and profit<br />
by satisfying consumers‟ needs”<br />
Creating value for shoppers together
Current Category Management Scope (purple)<br />
Planogram and<br />
Category Space<br />
Range<br />
(Choice)<br />
Supply chain<br />
opportunities<br />
Logistics<br />
Creating<br />
shopper value<br />
Price & promos<br />
(Price/Value)<br />
In Store experience<br />
(Environment)<br />
Best for <strong>New</strong><br />
Long-term vision<br />
Shopper marketing<br />
Category Marketing<br />
Instore Operations
Instore, CatMan can be viewed through the POP drivers lens<br />
“RSVP3”:<br />
•R<br />
•S<br />
•V<br />
•P<br />
•P<br />
•P<br />
ange<br />
pace<br />
isibility and Display<br />
rice<br />
romotion<br />
ersuasion (store staff – underused just about<br />
everyw<strong>here</strong>)!
We‟re going to cover both.<br />
Category Management vs Category Development: our view<br />
Category Management & Category<br />
Plans<br />
Category Development<br />
Tweaking yesterday‟s results<br />
for a slightly better today<br />
Incrementality<br />
Annual plans<br />
Existing category norms<br />
Play the existing game better<br />
Horizon/future focussed<br />
Tomorrow‟s growth<br />
Directional<br />
Mid term (3-5 years)<br />
Challenges norms<br />
Determine what the game is
Different types of plans that are linked to the Category Plan<br />
Category Plan<br />
Brand Plan<br />
Channel Plan<br />
Business &<br />
Customer Plans<br />
Internal and retailer facing<br />
plan<br />
Total category / multi-brand<br />
Category segments<br />
Range / Portfolio<br />
Internal facing plan<br />
Consumer marketing focus<br />
All categories / products<br />
relating to one brand<br />
Internal facing plan<br />
Cross customer within a<br />
channel<br />
May be multi-category<br />
Category level<br />
Retailer specific<br />
Retailer facing<br />
Sales focussed<br />
Eg Juice<br />
Eg Berri<br />
Eg Mass, Grocery,<br />
Specialty<br />
Eg WW, Coles<br />
Express, 7 Eleven<br />
Different but related – they all need each other
Brian Harris, „father of CatMan‟, looks at it like this<br />
Retail Marketing – The Big Waves<br />
Scanning<br />
Space<br />
Management<br />
1985<br />
Category<br />
Management<br />
1989<br />
ECR<br />
Category<br />
Management<br />
best practices<br />
1995<br />
Next generation<br />
store designs<br />
2000<br />
Shopper<br />
marketing<br />
TODAY<br />
1975<br />
Source: Harris, B: Bringing Shopper into Category Management, in ‘Shopper Marketing’, Markus Stahlberg Ed, Ville Maila, 2010 Pg29<br />
54
Summary<br />
• Category management – and<br />
trade/customer marketing - is<br />
evolving into more holistic shopper<br />
marketing<br />
• To stay relevant and reap rewards<br />
companies and brands need to look<br />
at the entire shopper experience<br />
• Retailers are looking to suppliers for<br />
insight and inspiration<br />
So now onto Shopper Marketing ...
Shopper Marketing: some definitions<br />
“The application of shopper insights along the path to purchase, to affect purchase behaviour in order<br />
to increase sales for both retailers and manufacturers”.<br />
- <strong>POPAI</strong> <strong>Australia</strong> Shopper Marketing Industry Council, January 2011<br />
“The use of insights-driven marketing and merchandising initiatives to satisfy the needs of targeted<br />
shoppers, enhance the shopping experience, and improve business results and brand equity for<br />
retailers and manufacturers.”<br />
-USA Retail Commission into Shopper Marketing, April 2010<br />
“All marketing stimuli, developed based on a deep understanding of shopper behavior, designed to<br />
build brand equity, engage the shopper (i.e., a consumer in „shopping mode‟), and lead him/her to<br />
make a purchase.”<br />
- Deloitte/GMA 2007: Shopper Marketing: Capturing a Shopper‟s Mind, Heart and Wallet<br />
56<br />
What‟s yours? Does it differ retailer vs manufacturer?
Themes and Trends<br />
FROM<br />
TO<br />
57
Shopper Marketing status<br />
Key Takeouts from the ShopAbility/<strong>POPAI</strong> Aust & NZ<br />
Shopper Marketing industry surveys 2010 and 2011<br />
PAGE 58
The new news: majority think shopper starts BEFORE store<br />
22% Mindset before store<br />
26%<br />
Influence at any point<br />
26%<br />
26%<br />
Inside and immed<br />
outside store<br />
Inside Store<br />
2010 study. N = 134. Top 2 box – agree/agree strongly<br />
Fairly evenly split. Over half think it's before store one way or another.<br />
This is a key shift, particularly for brand manufacturers.<br />
59
When does a consumer become a shopper?<br />
N = 134. Graph in # responses<br />
100%<br />
90%<br />
Disagree strongly<br />
80%<br />
70%<br />
Tend to disagree<br />
60%<br />
50%<br />
Neither<br />
40%<br />
30%<br />
Tend to agree<br />
20%<br />
10%<br />
Agree strongly<br />
0%<br />
At Home At Work In Transit Outside Store In Store<br />
All agree is instore. 80% consider Outside Store included. 60% consider At Home and In Transit included<br />
w<strong>here</strong> 60 only 40% consider At Work included. The majority include areas/mediums outside of the store .
Shopper Marketing Activity Scope: fairly even, and broad, split<br />
Q. In your opinion, what type of activities does „shopper marketing‟ involve?<br />
140<br />
120<br />
100<br />
80<br />
60<br />
40<br />
20<br />
0<br />
Source: SM Survey 2010. N = 134.<br />
Graph in # responses<br />
Traditional category management activities included. Ambient/sensory coming up 8th ... Definitely included<br />
(but 61 not necessarily acted on). Rating of media and sensory ties in to need for 'theatre' in interviews.
Shopper Marketing Technologies are evolving rapidly<br />
62
Usage of Digital and Mobile tactics for shopper in the USA<br />
PAGE 63
<strong>New</strong> technology uses in bricks and mortar (QR codes)<br />
PAGE 64
And <strong>here</strong>‟s how the digital SM uptake looks in <strong>Australia</strong><br />
Q. Which digital, online or social media techniques have you trialled or adopted for shopper<br />
marketing in the past 12 months? %<br />
60%<br />
50%<br />
40%<br />
30%<br />
20%<br />
10%<br />
0%<br />
PAGE 65<br />
Source: SM Survey 2011. N = 126
Instore, t<strong>here</strong> is interest in dynamic (interactive, digital) rather<br />
than static forms of POP<br />
70%<br />
60%<br />
50%<br />
More<br />
Same<br />
Less<br />
40%<br />
30%<br />
20%<br />
10%<br />
0%<br />
Source: SM Survey 2010. N = 134.<br />
Graph in # responses<br />
Moving away from just paper and cardboard (traditional POP). More interest in dynamic vs static forms.<br />
66
Recent thinking from the USA<br />
Key takeouts from:<br />
The Deloitte/GMA studies 2007 and 2008<br />
The Booz/GMA studies 2009 and 2010<br />
PAGE 67
Shopper Marketing Activity Types: Booz 2009<br />
68
Shopper Marketing Vehicles Taxonomy: Booz 2010<br />
(Thinking progressed from their 2009 study)<br />
69
Different vehicles play different roles:<br />
Awareness and Consideration<br />
70
Different vehicles different roles:<br />
Trial and Purchase<br />
71
Different vehicles different roles:<br />
Loyalty and Advocacy<br />
72
Alignment of Shopper Marketing platforms to Brand<br />
Objectives: Booz 2010<br />
73
Other types of vehicle selection considerations<br />
74
What is SM? Implications:<br />
Good news for shopper and brand marketers!<br />
• More holistic : Talks to the prestore/instore/post store „cycle‟<br />
• Not limited to traditional executions: as much about emotional as rational<br />
• A means of engaging brand marketers: using mediums they understand ...<br />
„shopper back‟ into home, rather than „consumer forward‟ into store<br />
• Broadened perspective on what Shopper Marketing activities = agency<br />
opportunity, and opportunity to trial some of the newer forms.<br />
Time for the needle to shift.<br />
75
Exercise: Understanding Shopper Marketing<br />
• Scope: <strong>New</strong> product launch – shopper marketing<br />
vehicles to use<br />
• Each team „makes up‟ a new product (eg coffee<br />
that already comes in its own mug). They can be<br />
fun and fantastic / joke products<br />
• Determine how you are going to integrate – and<br />
differentiate - consumer and shopper marketing<br />
into the launch of this product? Which consumer<br />
and shopper marketing vehicles would you use,<br />
and why?<br />
• Present to the rest of the group your launch plan.<br />
Topline level and big ideas is fine – you will be<br />
drilling down to more specifics on this campaign<br />
in other exercises.<br />
76 Exercise total time: 45 minutes
3. The Shopper Cycle<br />
… or, the „Path to Purchase‟<br />
77
Module 3: Content Coverage<br />
The Shopper Cycle and its Dynamics<br />
1. Shopper influences - Prestore, Instore and Post store<br />
2. Shopper marketing tools and techniques – w<strong>here</strong> they fit into the cycle<br />
3. Role of traditional consumer marketing in the cycle<br />
4. <strong>New</strong> Concepts: P2P (path to purchase)<br />
5. Business Model: Shopper cycle<br />
6. Exercise: Map a consumer P2P for a Specific Category in a Specific<br />
Channel<br />
78
The traditional „Path to Purchase‟ started at home ...<br />
Consideration<br />
Conversion<br />
W<strong>here</strong> they are<br />
At Home/Work In Transit Entrance to<br />
centre<br />
In centre<br />
In store<br />
What they see
While Instore P2P: different roles at different stages
Instore Path to Purchase:<br />
different areas of the store play different roles<br />
• Access, entry, welcome<br />
• Path to shelf (decision corridor)<br />
• Decision at shelf<br />
• Path to pay (impulse zone)<br />
• Queue and payment transaction<br />
• Exit.
Path to Purchase: what shoppers likely see at each stage<br />
… whether and what they NOTICE is a different question …<br />
• Aframes, sandwich boards, external signage, carpark media,<br />
floor mats, hanging signs/navigation signage<br />
• Hanging signs, pallet/floor display headers, gondola ends<br />
• Shelf and floor POS – brochures etc. Price ticketing.<br />
• Pallet/floor displays, impulse category displays<br />
• Checkout displays, checkout separators, headers on<br />
checkouts, impulse displays<br />
• Exit media – A frames, posters
BUT online and mobile technology is blurring the „P2P‟<br />
W<strong>here</strong> consumers stop and shoppers start is blurring<br />
FROM<br />
TO<br />
Prestore<br />
Instore<br />
Consumer<br />
Shopper<br />
Consideration<br />
Conversion<br />
“70% of decisions are made INSTORE” “ 75+% of decisions are made<br />
BEFORE the store”<br />
PAGE 83
The „first moment of truth‟ is now everyw<strong>here</strong><br />
FROM<br />
TO<br />
„First moment of<br />
truth‟<br />
„Second moment<br />
of truth‟<br />
PAGE 84
ECR‟s view of the consumer/shopper journey (April, 2011)<br />
85
Or the GFK Interscope „Web‟<br />
86
In fact, Harvey Hartman has written an entire article on this<br />
Key points from his article „For shoppers, t<strong>here</strong>‟s no<br />
place like home‟:<br />
• Shopping behaviour has more to do with things<br />
happening in the household than things happening in<br />
the store<br />
• Cultural occasions are more important than<br />
behavioural scripts<br />
• Cultural occasions drive shopping behaviour, w<strong>here</strong><br />
brands and products are tools to complete occasion<br />
specific tasks<br />
PAGE 87<br />
Source: Hartman, H: For Shoppers, T<strong>here</strong>’s No Place Like Home in ‘Shopper Marketing’, Markus Stahlberg Ed, Ville Maila, 2010 Pgs 38-41
Roles along whatever the „P2P‟ is do still change, however<br />
PAGE 88<br />
Courtesy Kraft USA
Techniques can be divided - more or less - into prestore,<br />
instore and post store<br />
Source: <strong>POPAI</strong> Shopper Marketing Industry<br />
Council, February 2011<br />
PAGE 89
Some examples:<br />
Prestore and instore<br />
PAGE 90
La Famiglia Garlic Bread:<br />
Competing against private label with strong branding and demos<br />
91
Masterchef <strong>Australia</strong>: Coles Sponsorship Leverage<br />
92
Coles Feed the Family for Under $10:<br />
Opportunities to include branded condiments etc<br />
93
Exercise: Shopper Cycle and Dynamics<br />
• Taking the new product launch plan each<br />
team has developed, develop further by<br />
mapping the path to purchase pre, in and<br />
post store for the nominated retailer and<br />
new product<br />
• Team to present to the group at which<br />
points the shopper will be engaged by<br />
what mechanic during the campaign.<br />
Draw it up on a timeline if you like.<br />
94 Exercise total time: 45 minutes<br />
• Specify why you have chosen the specific<br />
touchpoints and communications vehicles<br />
that you have.
4. Touchpoint Marketing &<br />
Messaging<br />
95
Module 4: Content Coverage<br />
Touchpoint Marketing & Messaging<br />
1. Instore touchpoints using the POP drivers<br />
2. Mapping all touchpoints and points of engagement on the path to<br />
purchase<br />
3. Determining communication messaging needs at each touchpoint<br />
4. Prioritising the touchpoints based on category and channel<br />
5. Determining an instore POP „picture of success‟<br />
6. <strong>New</strong> Concepts: POE (points of engagement), POP (point of purchase),<br />
Touchpoints,Picture of Success<br />
7. Exercise: Mapping an instore Picture of Success for all points of<br />
engagement for Category X in Channel Y<br />
96
Instore POP Drivers - Introducing RSVP3<br />
Traditional „Category Management‟ sits in Range and Space, with a bit of Price Promo thrown in<br />
• Range<br />
• Space<br />
• Visibility<br />
• Price<br />
• Promotion<br />
• Persuasion<br />
Ranging and deletions strategy<br />
Space and layout – flows, adjacencies, planograms<br />
Visibility and merchandising – what to put w<strong>here</strong><br />
POS optimisation including calls to action<br />
Price - pricing and promotion role and strategy<br />
Consumer promotion role and strategy<br />
Occasion-based marketing opportunity identification<br />
Persuasion and service – getting incremental sell, switch<br />
sell, upsell<br />
Shopper education tools
Range<br />
Ranging Strategy asks and solves:<br />
• What is the role of our category to trade<br />
and shoppers?<br />
• How does this impact our point of<br />
purchase and category strategy, and ability<br />
to achieve our goals?<br />
• In each of the channels we operate, what<br />
is the optimum range to ensure efficient<br />
stock rotation?<br />
• How should it differ per channel based on<br />
who shops t<strong>here</strong>?<br />
• How do we manage introductions and<br />
deletions?
Range: Category Segmentation (example)<br />
Confectionery<br />
Loose Bars Bags<br />
Block Box<br />
Kids Chocolate Sugar Chocolate Chocolate Chocolate<br />
•How the category is segmented is generally how it should be laid out on shelf.<br />
•Another example might be by audience eg Kids, Family, Adults<br />
•Or by health eg low fat, full fat, weight management etc.<br />
•How is your category segmented and w<strong>here</strong> do your products sit?<br />
•What new opportunities does segmenting the category throw up?
Reach<br />
1<br />
5<br />
9<br />
13<br />
17<br />
21<br />
25<br />
29<br />
33<br />
37<br />
41<br />
45<br />
49<br />
53<br />
57<br />
61<br />
65<br />
69<br />
73<br />
77<br />
81<br />
85<br />
Range rationalisation: traditionally cut „from the tail‟<br />
... w<strong>here</strong> the „tail‟ is skus not contributing to first 80% of volume/value<br />
Offpremise liquor category X example<br />
100%<br />
80% Reach<br />
Channel AU LL WW BWS 1C<br />
Sku count 64 66 54 69 48<br />
80%<br />
60%<br />
„tail‟<br />
60%<br />
Channel AU LL WW BWS 1C<br />
Sku count 25 28 20 28 17<br />
40%<br />
40% Reach<br />
Channel AU LL WW BWS 1C<br />
Sku count 12 12 8 11 8<br />
20%<br />
0%<br />
In this example, 1 st<br />
Choice achieves the<br />
greatest reach<br />
efficiency vs. sku count<br />
National LL WW BWS 1 Choice<br />
100<br />
However, cutting „from the back‟ does not acknowledge the role of
Space & Layout<br />
Bourbon Scotch Rum Vodka<br />
& Gin<br />
Liqueurs<br />
Premium<br />
Mainstream<br />
Value<br />
Bottled spirits example for bottleshops<br />
Space and Layout Strategy asks and solves:<br />
• W<strong>here</strong> should the category be located in store?<br />
• How should the category be laid out so the shopper<br />
can find what they want most easily?<br />
• Which category segments should be in what order?<br />
• Based on space to sales ratios, what space allocation<br />
and facings should each segment, each brand and<br />
each sku have?<br />
• What can we realistically get over and above what<br />
sales are telling us and what retailer story do we need<br />
to achieve this?<br />
• Outputs: flows, adjacencies, planograms
Space Management: Principles, Definitions, Considerations<br />
This SKU has 3 facings in a medium<br />
density category.<br />
Term<br />
Adjacencies<br />
Definition<br />
What goes next to what at category segment and SKU level.<br />
Days of supply<br />
How many days‟ worth of sales sit on the shelf for any one<br />
product at any given time.<br />
Density<br />
Facing<br />
Flow<br />
Movement (Velocity)<br />
The number of facings each SKU receives w<strong>here</strong> dense<br />
categories have only 1-2 facings per SKU (thus making the<br />
category hard to „read‟, eg Vitamins) and sparse categories have<br />
multiple facings per SKU (eg soft drinks).<br />
A product „slot‟ on shelf. One slot = 1 facing. Generally to be seen<br />
easily (and depending on product size) most products need<br />
minimum 3 facings.<br />
How the category is laid out along the aisle – what goes first,<br />
next, and last from left to right<br />
How quickly the product moves off the shelf. Stock turns per<br />
day/week. Impacted by shelf refilling schedules and promptness.<br />
Over facing<br />
Space to Sales<br />
Under facing<br />
Vertical Blocking<br />
When a brand or product is over represented by the number of<br />
facings it has on shelf . When its % of facings on shelf outnumber<br />
its share of sales. Sometimes seen with „beacon‟ brands in a<br />
category, to avoid Out of Stocks.<br />
The principle that whatever % a SKU represents of category sales<br />
is the % of shelf facings it should receive.<br />
When a brand or product is under represented by the number of<br />
facings it has on shelf ... When its sales outnumber its share of<br />
space. Often occurs in dense categories with long „tails‟.<br />
Brands and/or category segments are traditionally blocked<br />
vertically so they are easily „read‟ by shoppers
Visibility<br />
Visibility, Display & Merchandising is all about what to put<br />
w<strong>here</strong>, why:<br />
• What are the most important types of visibility pieces and<br />
locations for my category?<br />
• W<strong>here</strong> should our displays be placed? W<strong>here</strong> are the hot spots<br />
for our categories?<br />
• What POS and shopper education tools should we invest in?<br />
What are the most effective and important ongoing POS pieces<br />
for each channel, based on what the shopper sees?<br />
• What should be communicated on our POS for best effect?<br />
• What are the occasion based marketing opportunities for my<br />
category and how can we use these to get additional displays<br />
and sales throughout the year?<br />
• How will we know how many displays we are achieving, and<br />
their effectiveness?
Primary vs secondary locations<br />
Primary:<br />
• Mostly destination purchase<br />
• Can be destination browse<br />
• May be impulse browse on walk<br />
past<br />
Remembering impulse more likely after „main mission‟ completed.<br />
Secondary:<br />
• Mostly impulse/browse<br />
• Occasion or solution based if colocated<br />
• Pure impulse if an „island‟
Areas of the store:<br />
What are the your chosen category‟s opportunities in each?<br />
Grocery<br />
• Fresh Dept<br />
• Deli<br />
• Grocery dept (aisles)<br />
Plus:<br />
• Checkouts<br />
• Service desk<br />
• Front of store<br />
Mass<br />
Depts:<br />
• Apparel<br />
• Home<br />
• Health & Beauty<br />
• Home Ent<br />
• Others ...<br />
Plus:<br />
• Layby/returns<br />
• Checkouts<br />
• Price checkpoints<br />
Specialty<br />
Depts:<br />
➟ Home ent<br />
➟ Computing<br />
➟ Music<br />
➟ Gaming<br />
➟ Others ...<br />
Plus:<br />
➟ Registers<br />
➟ Impulse bins
Understand the whole store:<br />
POP strategy = w<strong>here</strong> to execute around whole store<br />
Fridges – dairy<br />
Deli<br />
Aisles<br />
Aisles Aisles Aisles Aisles Aisles<br />
Frozen<br />
goods<br />
Fresh fruit<br />
& veg<br />
Check<br />
out<br />
Check<br />
out<br />
Check<br />
out<br />
Check<br />
out<br />
Check<br />
out<br />
Bakery<br />
Tobacco & flowers<br />
Travel/navigation patterns change based on trip type.
Display Role changes by location<br />
‣Prompt/remind<br />
‣Switch (planned purchase)<br />
‣Upsell/trade up<br />
‣Incremental sell (additional purchase)<br />
‣Impulse?<br />
Determine what each of the display locations is intended to do.
Prioritising points of engagement<br />
Based on:<br />
• Category sales data per area of store (w<strong>here</strong> avail<br />
– the holy grail!)<br />
• What‟s destination and w<strong>here</strong> the destination<br />
categories and products are<br />
• W<strong>here</strong> impulse opportunities are – standalone and<br />
co-located<br />
• W<strong>here</strong> the major traffic flows are<br />
• Store type/channel segment and why shoppers are<br />
t<strong>here</strong><br />
• How shoppers behave in the store (shopper<br />
research) – what their major influences are.
Price<br />
Pricing Strategy asks and solves:<br />
• How important is price for our category to shoppers<br />
in each channel?<br />
• How do our shoppers gauge value?<br />
• What are the price ceilings and floors, and optimal<br />
price points?<br />
• How should we price ourselves relative to<br />
competitors?<br />
Pricing Promotion Strategy:<br />
• Is price promotion worthwhile – what‟s the likely<br />
ROI?<br />
• What should price promo frequency and depth be?
What works for DVD category? What doesn‟t?<br />
Pricing Mechanics<br />
• EDLP: everyday low price eg Big W general<br />
positioning<br />
• EDP: everyday price (not necessarily low)<br />
• Hi/Lo: promotional pricing. NB if you do Lo<br />
often enough it winds up resetting (lowering)<br />
the shopper‟s perception of the average<br />
price<br />
• Others?
Price promotion considerations<br />
Promotion principles<br />
Promotion objectives (AWOP, Freq, Spend etc)<br />
Promotion types and mechanics<br />
Price promotion: frequency and depth<br />
Seasonality and key retail occasions<br />
Analysis & application<br />
Baseline vs promotion sales<br />
Cannibalisation<br />
Promotional calendars and slotting<br />
Promotion support mechanisms
Price and purchase decision hierarchies<br />
• Price goes up and down in<br />
importance in purchase decisionmaking,<br />
depending on a number of<br />
factors:<br />
• Category type – level of<br />
involvement<br />
Flavour<br />
Pack size /<br />
format<br />
Same<br />
category,<br />
different<br />
shopper<br />
Price<br />
Flavour<br />
• Shopper type – degree of price<br />
sensitivity<br />
Brand<br />
Brand<br />
These can vary greatly.<br />
Price<br />
Pack size /<br />
format<br />
How do pricing tiers and the trade up tree work in context of the purchase hierarchy?<br />
PAGE 112
Promotion<br />
Consumer Promotion Strategy asks and solves:<br />
• What is the role of instore promotion in our category<br />
in each channel?<br />
• What are the most effective promotion mechanics<br />
based on our category objectives?<br />
• How will our promotions deliver against retailer<br />
objectives - why should they get on board?<br />
• What do we need to know to build an optimal<br />
promotional calendar for our categories and<br />
products?
Promotion objectives: what is the role of promotion?<br />
„I want to grow sales and our market share‟. Well, yes. But how?<br />
Who is it for?<br />
• Loyal brand buyers<br />
(AWOP/frequency<br />
based)<br />
• Occasional buyers<br />
(frequency based)<br />
• <strong>New</strong> consumers (trial<br />
based)<br />
Desired shopper outcome?<br />
•Frequency<br />
•AWOP<br />
•Increase spend<br />
•Trial<br />
•Brand switch<br />
•Build loyalty<br />
•Penetration<br />
•Awareness<br />
Retailer objectives<br />
•Drive traffic<br />
•Increase frequency<br />
•Increase spend<br />
•Improve basket<br />
penetration<br />
Which mechanics achieve these objectives?<br />
How important is promotion in the purchase decision tree?
Promotion Support mechanisms<br />
• Shelf ticketing<br />
• Advertising (ATL &<br />
BTL)<br />
• Catalogues<br />
• Displays<br />
• Other POS<br />
• Better results when<br />
combined rather than<br />
standalone<br />
Calendar combines all promotions, regardless of support mechanisms.<br />
Discuss: how do we determine which promotions get which support mechanisms?
Persuasion (store staff)<br />
Persuasion Strategy asks and solves:<br />
• Is our category an impulse, add-on or trade up<br />
opportunity?<br />
• With which other products and categories are our<br />
products best sold in tandem?<br />
• Can our brands be switch sold?<br />
• What do we need to do to get store managers and<br />
staff to actively promote our products? (eg training,<br />
incentives)<br />
• Role of switch sell, incremental sell, upsell, cross<br />
sell<br />
Persuasion becomes more important the more involved the product and channel.
Instore „pictures of success‟<br />
• A tool for sales and<br />
merchandising<br />
teams<br />
• A store map,<br />
indicating what<br />
area needs to be<br />
activated with what,<br />
and what priority it<br />
is<br />
• Priorities can be<br />
indicated with<br />
numbers, traffic<br />
lights, letters etc<br />
PAGE 117
Combining instore drivers and out<br />
of store messages<br />
Some examples.<br />
See also case studies: “The Connected Store”,<br />
“Mobile Applications”<br />
118
Case Study: Walmart Simple Steps<br />
• Walmart is inviting<br />
shoppers to „Take a<br />
Healthy Step for<br />
Less‟<br />
• By showing them<br />
how to save on<br />
health and wellness<br />
offerings such as<br />
fitness equipment,<br />
workout gear and<br />
nutrition items, as<br />
well as healthy<br />
options from the<br />
grocery aisle with its<br />
“Simple Steps”<br />
program.<br />
• The retailer has<br />
bundled these<br />
products together in<br />
a variety of touch<br />
points with a “Save<br />
on Healthy Living”<br />
tag.<br />
119<br />
Source: MarketingLab April 2010
Case Study: Target Super Valen Bowl<br />
• Two Big Dates to<br />
Love: The Super<br />
Bowl and Valentine‟s<br />
Day – in shared<br />
POP, media and<br />
other marketing<br />
materials and under<br />
a "Happy<br />
SuperValenBowl"<br />
theme.<br />
• The events were<br />
also united in a<br />
"Super Love Sender"<br />
program on Target‟s<br />
Facebook page.<br />
• “Fans“ could send<br />
customized video<br />
cards to help<br />
determine how to<br />
allocate a $1 million<br />
donation for<br />
educational<br />
programs.<br />
120<br />
Source: MarketingLab April 2010
Case Study: Publix Greenwise<br />
• Greenwise is a part<br />
of Publix‟s broader<br />
health and wellness<br />
program.<br />
• This is a one-stop<br />
shopping<br />
destination for<br />
anyone who<br />
appreciates<br />
organic, all-natural,<br />
and earth-friendly<br />
products, excellent<br />
food and non-food<br />
products, and a<br />
thoroughly<br />
enjoyable shopping<br />
experience.<br />
121<br />
Source: MarketingLab April 2010
Case Study: OfficeMax In Place System<br />
• OfficeMax<br />
reinforced recent<br />
efforts to attract<br />
female shoppers by<br />
introducing an<br />
exclusive In-Place<br />
System brand from<br />
"organization<br />
expert" Peter Walsh<br />
of TLC‟s Clean<br />
Sweep.<br />
• Merchandised on a<br />
dedicated endcap<br />
and an in-line<br />
display, the brand<br />
comprises 21 SKUs<br />
of file folders,<br />
desktop sorters, file<br />
totes, magazine<br />
files, and other<br />
stationery products.<br />
122<br />
Source: MarketingLab April 2010
And a bit closer to home ...<br />
123
Instore POS to suit the retailer<br />
124
Supported with a national TVC<br />
125
And with on-pack stickers<br />
126
And digitally, with a microsite, website and eDM<br />
127
Coca-Cola „360‟ activations of the FIFA World Cup 2010<br />
128
... across Europe<br />
129
Kraft occasion based instore and out of store<br />
activations for „Philly‟<br />
130
Multiple occasions<br />
131
Executed out of store and instore<br />
132
133
Uncle Tobys/Woolworths campaign:<br />
„Go Red For Women‟ 2010<br />
• Situation: UNCLE TOBYS oats wanted to leverage its sponsorship with the<br />
National Heart Foundation‟s Go Red for Women. A great fit with heart wellbeing<br />
for the brand. But getting retailer buy in for a charity event which had no shopper<br />
hook or retailer tie in was proving tricky. After all, we needed the agreement to pay<br />
back in sales.<br />
• Task: Create a compelling campaign that spanned the path to purchase if to<br />
engage one key retailer (Woolworths) including a strong shopper call to action<br />
even though the awareness for the GRFW campaign was still very low.<br />
• Activity: We created a campaign that shoppers could understand in a nano<br />
second and that brought to life our partnership with the heart foundation.<br />
• Result: Impactful displays built in stores, refreshing our oats season mid way<br />
through, keeping our displays up for longer and resulting in a record oats season<br />
in Woolworths.<br />
134
Go Red for Women: Activation<br />
• Out of store: ATL<br />
Radio campaign<br />
encouraging shoppers<br />
into Woolworths.<br />
• Near store: UT Nail<br />
Bars strategically placed<br />
in shopping malls near<br />
prominent Woolworths<br />
stores<br />
• In store: ambassadors<br />
to educate their<br />
shoppers about GRFW<br />
and UT cholesterol<br />
lowering capabilities<br />
135
Coles Oats Season 2011<br />
• Situation: Our aim was to kick off the oats season early in Coles. Usually oats<br />
displays go up post Easter but with Easter being very late in 2011, both UNCLE<br />
TOBYS and Coles were concerned about missing a whole month‟s worth of<br />
sales. Coles had their own winter theme of “Get out and Get Active” w<strong>here</strong> as<br />
ours focused on our key brand messages of “cholesterol” and “Ready in 90<br />
seconds”<br />
• Task: We needed a display unit that would satisfy both Coles and Uncle Tobys in<br />
terms of design and artwork that could go into stores for April (it was now March)<br />
• Activity: We worked collaboratively with Coles to find an artwork solution w<strong>here</strong><br />
both parties were happy<br />
• Results: The unit was placed in over 500 stores and kick started the oats season<br />
early in Coles, ensuring a successful 2012 oats season.<br />
136
Coles Oats 2011: Activation Challenges<br />
• Creative: creating a Coles look and<br />
feel and a tie in with their winter<br />
theme (“Get Oat and About with<br />
Coles this winter”) which enabled<br />
UT to keep key branded messages.<br />
• Unit design: Coles operations team<br />
design guidelines - making sure it<br />
ticked all Coles‟ boxes and had<br />
enough stockweight<br />
• Product content: Coles requested<br />
Nutella inclusion which Nestle<br />
allowed in order to put the customer<br />
first (despite causing some internal<br />
discussions with confectionery<br />
division). Honey may be included<br />
next year as a more natural fit.<br />
137
Exercise: Touchpoint Messaging and Marketing<br />
Using your team‟s same campaign, determine:<br />
1. What do you need to create/produce?<br />
2. W<strong>here</strong> does it need to go? (Prioritise the touchpoints)<br />
3. How does the message need to change out of store vs instore,<br />
and within the store?<br />
4. What should the messages say? (campaign tagline, out of<br />
store messages, instore calls to action)<br />
5. Provide a topline „picture of success‟ for that product launch in<br />
that retailer<br />
6. Present your thinking to the group (optional, based on time).<br />
138 Exercise total time: 45 minutes
So What?<br />
• Getting instore execution right is the MINIMUM, not the end point. If you don‟t<br />
execute out-of-store you are missing several tricks<br />
• Multiple media and geographical points to reach shoppers. You can‟t do them all,<br />
so choose those that are most impactful for your target shopper, based on what<br />
you know about them<br />
• Use occasion based and trip type marketing for SALIENCE<br />
• As shoppers become increasingly accustomed to deep discounts, brand winners<br />
will be those who are remembered for an emotion or experience.<br />
139
5. Shopper Behaviour<br />
Fundamentals<br />
See also case studies:<br />
Campbell‟s Meal Solutions<br />
Kraft Occasion Based marketing<br />
140
Module 5: Content Coverage<br />
Shopper Behaviour Fundamentals<br />
1. Usage occasions vs shopping trip missions<br />
2. Marketing to occasions and missions<br />
3. Shopper segmentation and store clustering – changing your offer<br />
according to who your shoppers are<br />
4. <strong>New</strong> Concepts:-Occasions, Missions, Dayparts<br />
5. Business model: Category/Channel/Occasion/Trip type matrix<br />
6. Exercise: Build an occasion based marketing initiative (may include<br />
multiple manufacturers across the chosen category).<br />
141
Core shopper behaviours: The 5Ws + 5Hs<br />
Ws<br />
WHO<br />
Key shoppers of the category are<br />
WHAT<br />
They buy – subcategory, product,<br />
format, size<br />
WHEN<br />
They buy it – times of day, days of<br />
week, seasonality<br />
WHY<br />
They buy it – occasions, missions,<br />
drivers, motivators, influences<br />
They don‟t buy it – barriers to<br />
purchase<br />
WHERE<br />
Channel , retailer and store choice<br />
W<strong>here</strong> within the category<br />
layout/shelf they buy<br />
Do they go and not go in the store?<br />
What do they see/not see? W<strong>here</strong><br />
are the display „hot spots‟ ?<br />
Hs<br />
HOW<br />
They buy – how they make<br />
decisions<br />
Purchase decision hierarchy<br />
They shop – browsing, degree of<br />
planning vs impulse<br />
HOW MANY<br />
People buy from the aisle, from the<br />
primary and secondary locations?<br />
Items do they buy at a time? What‟s<br />
the average weight of purchase?<br />
HOW MUCH<br />
Do they spend on the category per<br />
purchase occasion?<br />
HOW OFTEN<br />
Do they buy the category? Daily,<br />
weekly, monthly, quarterly?<br />
How long is it between purchases on<br />
average?<br />
HOW LONG<br />
Do they spend in store? In the aisle?<br />
142<br />
© ShopAbility 2009
Information types<br />
Who<br />
What<br />
When<br />
W<strong>here</strong><br />
Why<br />
Aspect Includes things like ...<br />
Key shoppers of the category are<br />
Shopper segment profiling<br />
They buy – subcategory, product, pack format, pack size, serve size<br />
They buy it – times of day, days of week, seasonality<br />
They buy - channel , retailer and store choice for that category<br />
W<strong>here</strong> within the category layout/shelf they buy<br />
W<strong>here</strong> do they go and not go in the store? What do they see/not see? W<strong>here</strong> are the display „hot<br />
spots‟ ?<br />
They buy it – usage occasions, missions and trip types, drivers, motivators, influences<br />
They don‟t buy it – barriers to purchase<br />
Likes, dislikes and preferences<br />
How<br />
How Often<br />
How Many<br />
How Much<br />
How 143 Long<br />
They buy – how they make decisions<br />
Purchase decision hierarchy<br />
They shop – browsing, degree of planning vs impulse<br />
Do they buy the category or shop the channel/retailer/store? Daily, weekly, monthly, quarterly,<br />
annually?<br />
How long is it between purchases on average? (IPI - Interpurchase Interval)<br />
People buy from the aisle, from the primary and secondary locations?<br />
Items do they buy at a time?<br />
What‟s the average weight of purchase (AWOP)?<br />
Do they spend on the category/at the store/per basket - over time? Per purchase occasion?<br />
Do they spend in store? In the aisle?
Hows : some key concepts<br />
• Traffic – browse – buy: which is most<br />
important?<br />
• Dwell time: engagement or confusion?<br />
• Planning: what is true impulse?<br />
• Purchase hierarchies: used to help shoppers<br />
navigate the category (space/layout and<br />
pricing strategy, brand blocking) based on how<br />
they make category purchase decisions.<br />
144
„Hows‟ : Let‟s talk about purchase<br />
decision hierarchies<br />
Otherwise known as Consumer Decision Trees<br />
145
Not one-size-fits-all for a category. Herein lies the complexity ...<br />
Filters pre-store are things<br />
like:<br />
• Who the shopper is<br />
(attitudes, behaviours)<br />
• Who they are shopping<br />
for<br />
• What the occasion is<br />
(meal type, degree of<br />
formality)<br />
• W<strong>here</strong> they are (location)<br />
• Attitudes to cooking<br />
• Attitudes to health<br />
• These then become the<br />
minimum level of<br />
appropriateness criteria<br />
for the category they<br />
are shopping.<br />
Typical Hierarchy Elements<br />
• Brand (including private<br />
labels)<br />
• Pack type/format (eg can,<br />
bottle, tetra pack, bag,<br />
block, bar, box)<br />
• Pack size<br />
• Product type (eg type of<br />
cheese)<br />
• Flavour (eg strawberry,<br />
chocolate)<br />
• Price<br />
• BUT t<strong>here</strong> are<br />
additional elements for<br />
different categories.<br />
Hierarchy elements differ<br />
by category<br />
• Dairy: fat content<br />
• Cat food: will my cat eat it<br />
• Muesli bars: nutrition<br />
content<br />
• AND they change<br />
according to the<br />
shopper segment/type<br />
of shopper.<br />
146
Example: Dairy Category X Decision Hierarchy<br />
Lenses pre-store: Who am I?<br />
Before fixture (subconscious decisions):<br />
Level of<br />
involvement<br />
Occasion<br />
Less variable factors – lens<br />
Attitudes to food & dairy, household type /<br />
who buying for, occasions, Health / diet<br />
Format<br />
Type<br />
Full fat<br />
Eg Tub /<br />
bottle<br />
Lite<br />
No fat<br />
At fixture (conscious decisions):<br />
Size<br />
1kg<br />
500g<br />
500g<br />
500g<br />
Variable factors –<br />
How much will I spend? how much do I<br />
need? what‟s on promotion?<br />
Price<br />
Cheapest<br />
possible<br />
2 for<br />
special<br />
Cheapest<br />
possible<br />
Catalogue<br />
special<br />
Product<br />
WW PL<br />
Brand X<br />
Coles PL<br />
Brand X<br />
147
Typical Xmas gift purchase decision hierarchy<br />
What<br />
recipient is<br />
into<br />
Perceived<br />
worth /<br />
quality<br />
Price<br />
148
Home entertainment category: Shopper Segment X<br />
PreStore<br />
InStore<br />
Range Channel<br />
Genre <strong>New</strong>ness<br />
Who has a<br />
big range?<br />
Who has the<br />
best<br />
experience?<br />
Influences:<br />
•Theatre<br />
•Hype<br />
•Covers<br />
•Merchandise
Home entertainment category: Shopper Segment Y<br />
Catalogs, online<br />
Title<br />
Price<br />
Store<br />
Who has<br />
best deal?<br />
What‟s on<br />
offer?<br />
•Loyalty<br />
programs<br />
•Multibuys<br />
Price<br />
Available<br />
Is it at the<br />
advertised price?<br />
Do they have it<br />
in stock?<br />
Extremely highly planned, very hard to influence instore.
Wine hierarchy:<br />
Differs according to shopper level of involvement<br />
Occasion Who is buying Mood Location<br />
Trip Type<br />
Alcohol<br />
Wine<br />
Colour<br />
High<br />
involvement<br />
Med<br />
involvement<br />
Low<br />
involvement<br />
Region/ Variety Variety Price<br />
Price Price Variety<br />
Brand Brand Brand<br />
Need to quantify the segments to get dominant type. Even so, how do you talk to them all?<br />
151
How can you apply a purchase decision hierarchy?<br />
• And how does it differ from Navigation?<br />
152
Grocery shopper Who: Not just „MGB‟<br />
Lifestage and household type/size key shopping determinants<br />
SINK/<br />
YOUNG<br />
OLDER<br />
EMPTY<br />
DINK<br />
FAMILY<br />
FAMILY<br />
NESTER<br />
• More disposable<br />
income = less price<br />
conscious<br />
• More into quality,<br />
premium, gourmet<br />
• Pets (small dogs)<br />
• Entertaining<br />
• Smaller living &<br />
storage space =<br />
smaller packs and<br />
volume<br />
• Baby, kids and<br />
school<br />
• Sports and nutrition<br />
• What the kids like/will<br />
eat<br />
• More budget<br />
conscious<br />
(mortgage)<br />
• Brand repertoires for<br />
variety<br />
• Feeding the masses<br />
• Volume for the best<br />
price<br />
• More private label<br />
• Larger packs and<br />
bulk buys<br />
• Catalogue perusers<br />
for planning<br />
• Brand loyals<br />
• Value for money<br />
• Service and<br />
acknowledgement<br />
• Mainstream brands<br />
• Stick to what they<br />
know<br />
• Experimental –<br />
sampling and demos<br />
153<br />
Attitudinal and behavioural, not geodemo.<br />
And blokes are up to 46% of grocery shoppers!
Shopper „types‟ – a number of levels<br />
Attitudinal/behavioural vs geodemographic?<br />
By Category<br />
Within Channel<br />
Cross channel „core type‟<br />
154
Within Channel: Grocery Example<br />
T<strong>here</strong> is no one „right‟ way to segment shoppers<br />
Behavioural<br />
Behavioural<br />
(courtesy Mars Advertising)<br />
(courtesy IMI)<br />
Lifestage/Demographic<br />
(courtesy Torchmedia)<br />
• Drifters<br />
• Grazers<br />
• Planners<br />
• Pragmatists<br />
• Bargain Hunter<br />
• Planner<br />
• Loyalist<br />
• Savvy Saver<br />
• Impulsive<br />
• Experimental/experiential<br />
• Bachelor Pad<br />
• Sex and the City<br />
• DINKs<br />
• Soccer Mum<br />
• Super Dad<br />
• Shared Household<br />
• Empty Nesters<br />
• Golden Oldies<br />
The jury is out on whether the cross channel ‟base‟ typology applies across categories, or whether<br />
behaviour changes by category (the „mode‟ you‟re in) irrespective of your basic cross channel type.<br />
155
Grocery shopper Who: Not just „MGB‟<br />
Lifestage and household type/size key shopping determinants<br />
SINK/<br />
YOUNG<br />
OLDER<br />
DINK<br />
FAMILY<br />
FAMILY<br />
EMPTY<br />
NESTER<br />
• More disposable<br />
income = less price<br />
conscious<br />
• More into quality,<br />
premium, gourmet<br />
• Pets (small dogs) as<br />
kids<br />
• Entertaining<br />
• Smaller living &<br />
storage space =<br />
smaller packs and<br />
volume<br />
• Experimental –<br />
sampling and demos<br />
• Baby, kids and<br />
school<br />
• Sports and nutrition<br />
• What the kids like/will<br />
eat<br />
• More budget<br />
conscious<br />
(mortgage)<br />
• Brand repertoires for<br />
variety<br />
• Feeding the masses<br />
• Volume for the best<br />
price<br />
• More private label<br />
• Larger packs and<br />
bulk buys<br />
• Catalogue perusers<br />
for planning<br />
• Brand loyals<br />
• Value for money<br />
• Service and<br />
acknowledgement<br />
• Mainstream brands<br />
• Stick to what they<br />
know<br />
Lifestage typologies apply but differ per channel (eg P&C is more SINK/DINK).<br />
And blokes are up to 46% of grocery shoppers!<br />
156
Category Specific Shopper Examples<br />
Beer & Wine<br />
Dairy<br />
Home Entertainment<br />
• Enthusiasts & Cellar Manager<br />
(range breadth, depth and<br />
„new stuff‟ most important)<br />
• Entertainers (occasionals –<br />
known brands at good price)<br />
• Quaffers (repertoire buyers<br />
based on price)<br />
• Loyalists (stick to 1-2<br />
preferred products, may stock<br />
up on them when on special)<br />
• Bang For Buck<br />
• Brand Repertoire<br />
• Visual and innovation<br />
stimulation<br />
• Planned value hunters<br />
• Experientials<br />
• Buffs<br />
• Love movies hate shopping<br />
• Bargain bin fossickers<br />
Often based on shopper‟s level of involvement/engagement in the category (direct correlations<br />
to purchase frequency)<br />
157<br />
Decision making tempered by who for, and the occasion
Linking Consumer & Shopper<br />
Consumer and shopper segmentations will more closely align in channels and<br />
categories w<strong>here</strong> the shopper is the consumer more of the time<br />
VS<br />
158<br />
Shopper research can link consumer to shopper profiles using Needscope and other<br />
techniques.
Combining retailer and manufacturer segmentations<br />
(ECR example, April 2011)<br />
159
Whys: Occasions = cross category marketing opportunities<br />
Christmas<br />
Gifting Seasonal Ethnic, religious and<br />
commemorative<br />
Valentines Day<br />
Summer – holidays,<br />
entertaining, at the<br />
beach<br />
Winter – eg „winter<br />
warmers‟, ski<br />
Events &<br />
Sporting<br />
Consumer<br />
Chinese <strong>New</strong> Year Olympics Entertaining: summer BBQ,<br />
Dinner Party, parties, having<br />
mates over (watch footy finals,<br />
other sporting events), quiet<br />
night in<br />
Cinco de Mayo<br />
(Mexico)<br />
Easter Autumn Anzac Day, <strong>Australia</strong><br />
Day<br />
Mothers Day Spring St Patrick‟s Day<br />
Fathers Day Seasonal conditions:<br />
Hay fever, mosquitoes,<br />
cold & flu<br />
4 th of July (US<br />
Independence Day)<br />
Halloween<br />
Bastille Day (France)<br />
F1 Grand<br />
Prix<br />
Footy Finals<br />
Meals: breakfast (at home, in<br />
transit), lunch (at home,<br />
lunchbox for school/work),<br />
dinner tonight, snacks, food to<br />
go (lunch on the run).<br />
Kids: back to school, summer<br />
holiday amusements &<br />
distractions<br />
Birthdays &<br />
anniversaries<br />
Cherry blossom<br />
festival (Japan)<br />
All Saints‟ Day (half of<br />
Europe, it seems!)<br />
160
Occasion based displays in offpremise liquor stores<br />
161
International: SuperValu Holiday Joy<br />
An occasion based platform that yielded a number of activations for the third<br />
largest food retailer in the USA.<br />
Concept:<br />
“Holiday Joy Made Easy”<br />
Joy for Family Joy for Self Joy for Others<br />
Planning<br />
Big<br />
Events<br />
Mid<br />
holiday<br />
meals<br />
Mom time for self<br />
Give back to<br />
community<br />
162
163
Trip types vary by channel:<br />
Market to SHOPPERS, not consumers<br />
Supermarket<br />
Mass Merchant/<br />
Discount<br />
Department Store<br />
Convenience<br />
Liquor<br />
Off Premise<br />
Pharmacy<br />
Stock Up Leisure / Browse Fuel Stock Up Script Fill<br />
Destination<br />
Destination<br />
Destination<br />
(Snack, Beverage,<br />
<strong>New</strong>spaper)<br />
Destination<br />
(Replace my regular<br />
tipple)<br />
Destination<br />
(e.g. cosmetics, weight<br />
loss)<br />
Top Up<br />
Gifting<br />
Service<br />
(ATM, Trailer Hire)<br />
Gifting<br />
Services<br />
(Tests, Checks)<br />
Entertaining Entertaining Entertaining<br />
Entertaining<br />
(at my or someone<br />
else‟s place)<br />
Distress<br />
(in pain, fix my problem)<br />
Dinner Tonight Quick Meal With / After Dinner<br />
Main Trip Types by Retail Channel © ShopAbility 2011<br />
164
Degree of planning vs impulse:<br />
Less true „impulse‟ than you would think<br />
Least<br />
100%<br />
90%<br />
80%<br />
70%<br />
60%<br />
50%<br />
40%<br />
30%<br />
20%<br />
Don't know<br />
I didn't plan to browse/buy<br />
this category<br />
I decided to browse the<br />
category in store<br />
I decided to browse the<br />
category before entering the<br />
store<br />
I knew the type of product I<br />
wanted but not the variant<br />
I knew the type of product I<br />
wanted but not the brand<br />
Most<br />
10%<br />
0%<br />
Total<br />
I knew exactly the<br />
product/variant/pack size I<br />
wanted<br />
Depending on the channel ,category and trip type, t<strong>here</strong> may be a lot or a little impulse.<br />
On average in <strong>Australia</strong> we find that most categories in grocery are planned around 70%<br />
165
Let‟s discuss some examples<br />
Occasions<br />
Missions &<br />
Trip Types<br />
Dayparts<br />
Shopper<br />
segments &<br />
clustering<br />
166 How is degree of planning/impulse involved in each?
Exercise #1: Shopper Behaviour Fundamentals<br />
• For your product‟s category, map all<br />
consumption occasions. Indicate which<br />
you think the largest/most common<br />
occasions are.<br />
• Map the likely trip types/shopping<br />
missions for your category. Indicate<br />
which you the largest/most common<br />
trip types are likely to be (ie the split).<br />
• Hypothesise the different shopper<br />
types for your product‟s category –<br />
geodemo, but also attitudinal and<br />
behavioural.<br />
167 Exercise total time: 45 minutes
Exercise #2: Shopper Behaviour Fundamentals<br />
(Optional Exercise – if time)<br />
• Build an occasion based marketing<br />
initiative based on the occasions<br />
relevant for your product (may include<br />
multiple manufacturers in your<br />
product‟s chosen category and across<br />
complimentary categories).<br />
• Build a shopping mission/trip type<br />
based initiative for your product – make<br />
assumptions about what kind of<br />
shopping trip shoppers of your product<br />
are likely to be on in your chosen<br />
channels.<br />
168 Exercise total time: 45 minutes
6. Shopper Insights: what they are<br />
and what to do with them<br />
169
Module 6: Content Coverage<br />
Shopper Insights and what to do with them<br />
1. Why shopper insights sit at the heart of Shopper Marketing<br />
2. What is an insight vs What is merely information?<br />
3. Types of insights – the 5Ws and 5Hs<br />
4. Stakeholder engagement – manufacturer and retailer<br />
5. Applying the findings<br />
6. <strong>New</strong> Concepts: research methodology types<br />
7. Case studies: Outputs and Applications from previous studies<br />
8. Exercise: Build a Shopper Research brief<br />
9. Business model: Methodology/Insight matrix<br />
170
Data vs Research: what‟s the difference?<br />
• Shopper research is attitudinal as well as behavioural, w<strong>here</strong> shopper data is<br />
behavioural and/or the outputs of the behaviour. Shopper insights are most<br />
powerful when attitudes and behaviours are married to behavioural outputs. Ie,<br />
when you blend together<br />
• It‟s even more powerful when you marry your shopper data and research with your<br />
consumer research (particularly usage occasions). T<strong>here</strong>‟s not a clear cut line<br />
from when the consumer becomes the shopper. The Shopper Marketing survey<br />
highlighted this, with 75% of respondents believing that shopper starts outside of<br />
or before the store, not just in it.<br />
• We look at shopper research as covering a mix of what we call the „5Ws and 5Hs‟:<br />
Who, What, When, W<strong>here</strong>, Why, How, How Often, How Many, How Much, and<br />
How Long.<br />
171
Most powerful when data sources are combined<br />
Shopper<br />
Who, why and how:<br />
• How they view the category<br />
• How they behave instore<br />
• How they use the category<br />
• What influences them pre,<br />
during and post purchase<br />
• Degree of pre-planning<br />
What they buy, when, and<br />
with what<br />
Sales and Home scan data eg<br />
• Average weight of purchase<br />
• Basket incidence<br />
• Household penetration<br />
• Spend<br />
Data<br />
Trade<br />
Realistic sense check<br />
• What retailers need<br />
• Retailer objectives<br />
• Category role<br />
• Staff considerations<br />
• Their shopper needs<br />
• Operational logistics<br />
• What will and won‟t fly<br />
Different sources answer different things.<br />
172
Another way to look at this is ...<br />
Input<br />
(Prestore)<br />
Process<br />
(Prestore, Instore)<br />
Outcome<br />
(Instore)<br />
Post Store<br />
• Attitudinal<br />
• Needs<br />
• Behaviour<br />
• PDH – qual and<br />
quant<br />
• Data – scan,<br />
homescan<br />
• Attitudinal<br />
(satisfaction)<br />
• Usage (satisfaction)<br />
• Path to purchase<br />
• Claimed behaviour<br />
• Shopper trackers<br />
• Limited attitudinal<br />
Bespoke research<br />
Bespoke research<br />
Trackers<br />
Scan data<br />
Sales data<br />
Bespoke research<br />
173
Types of shopper research<br />
(selected, not exhaustive)<br />
Diagnostic<br />
„Start from scratch‟<br />
understanding,<br />
answering the<br />
fundamental<br />
questions when you<br />
want to know how a<br />
category, channel or<br />
store works<br />
Specific<br />
To a specific brief, eg.<br />
• Range optimisation, pack<br />
assessments, portfolio gaps<br />
• Space & layout concept evaluations<br />
• Category & shopper segmentation<br />
• Changing specific aspects of in store<br />
execution<br />
• Store trials research support<br />
Pricing &<br />
Promotion<br />
• Choice models<br />
• Conjoints<br />
• Brand/ price/<br />
product trade offs<br />
• Elasticities<br />
• Promotion<br />
mechanics<br />
assessments<br />
174<br />
© ShopAbility 2010
Claimed vs Actual behaviour:<br />
Most holistic when combine both<br />
Claimed:<br />
Actual:<br />
• Perceptions & attitudes<br />
• How they make decisions<br />
• Why they behaved that way<br />
• Spend<br />
• Frequency<br />
• Trip type<br />
• Who buying for<br />
• Purchase occasion<br />
• Intended vs actual purchase<br />
Eg:<br />
Accompanied Shops<br />
Intercept & exit interviews<br />
Online surveys<br />
• W<strong>here</strong> they go (navigation)<br />
• How many go w<strong>here</strong> (traffic)<br />
• How long they take (duration)<br />
• What they do (interactions –<br />
browse vs buy)<br />
• Who they are (gender, age)<br />
Eg:<br />
Observations<br />
Shopper shadowing<br />
Video capture<br />
Exploratory = soft measures, Evaluation = hard measures.<br />
175<br />
© ShopAbility 2010
Methodology Scope :<br />
Tailored, not one-size-fits-all<br />
„Why‟ and „how‟ insights often come from qual and<br />
out of store.<br />
Instore<br />
Observations – whole of<br />
shopper pathways, specific<br />
zones<br />
Intercepts<br />
Exit interviews<br />
Accompanied shops<br />
Multi channel immersions<br />
Movement tracking<br />
Instore workshops<br />
Trade research<br />
Out of<br />
store<br />
Focus groups<br />
Diaries<br />
Online surveys<br />
Ethnography<br />
Semiotics (category codes)<br />
Clinics (virtual shelf, pack)<br />
176
Instore<br />
What methodology goes w<strong>here</strong>?<br />
Evaluation (quant, measure)<br />
Movement tracking<br />
Observations<br />
Exit interviews<br />
Audio verbatims<br />
Intercept interviews<br />
Diaries<br />
Online surveys<br />
Out of store<br />
Accompanied shops<br />
Focus groups<br />
Immersions<br />
Vox Pops<br />
Workshops<br />
Clinics<br />
Trade research<br />
Explore (qual, „unpick‟)<br />
Exploration (qual) of equal importance to Evaluation (quant).<br />
177
Instore marketing research:<br />
Two levels of measures, need both<br />
Soft:<br />
Hard:<br />
• Awareness<br />
• Consideration<br />
• Appeal/impact<br />
• Purchase intent<br />
• Preference<br />
• Sales<br />
• Increased purchase level<br />
(claimed and actual)<br />
• Behaviours – conversion rates,<br />
browse & dwell times<br />
• Retail multiple – traffic, frequency,<br />
AWOP/transaction size, spend<br />
Short-mid term impact<br />
Longer term impact<br />
Exploratory = soft measures, Evaluation = hard measures.<br />
178
Research methodologies and what they cover<br />
Methodology Research Type 5Ws and 5Hs covered Scope<br />
(includes, not limited to ...)<br />
Qualitative<br />
Claimed<br />
Accompanied shops and<br />
depth interviews<br />
Focus groups<br />
Instore observations<br />
(category specific or<br />
whole-of-trip shopper<br />
shadowing)<br />
Qualitative<br />
Claimed<br />
Quantitative<br />
Actual<br />
All 5Ws and 5Hs<br />
except How Long – in<br />
depth<br />
All 5Ws and 5Hs<br />
except How Long – in<br />
depth<br />
Who<br />
What<br />
When<br />
How Long<br />
Shopper types and segmentation<br />
Likes, frustrations, triggers, barriers,<br />
motivations<br />
Usage<br />
Per Accompanied Shops<br />
Gender, approx age, basket type<br />
Dwell time at fixture<br />
Traffic to browse to buy conversions<br />
Instore interviews<br />
(intercept or exit)<br />
Quantitative<br />
Actual and claimed<br />
Ws: who, what, why<br />
(some), w<strong>here</strong> (some)<br />
Hs: how many, how<br />
often, how much, hows<br />
(some)<br />
They buy the product, category, channel,<br />
store<br />
Degree of planning<br />
Biggest influences<br />
Trip types and usage occasions<br />
Online Surveys<br />
Shopper diaries<br />
(paper or online)<br />
179<br />
Quantitative<br />
Claimed<br />
Qual or Quant<br />
Claimed (perceptions)<br />
Actual (self recorded<br />
behaviours)<br />
All 5Ws and 5Hs<br />
except How Long<br />
All 5Ws and 5Hs<br />
Per Accompanied Shops, but with numbers<br />
put around it<br />
Concept testing – layouts, pricing models<br />
Per Accompanied Shops
Need for channel and retailer specificity<br />
•Behaviours, trips, and occasions differ<br />
across channels and categories<br />
•Findings will differ across retailers in the<br />
same channel, even for the same<br />
category<br />
•Retailer specific research means can<br />
blend manufacturer and retailer<br />
objectives, hypotheses and priorities<br />
•Means can result in tailored programs<br />
specific to individual retailers.<br />
Shopper behaviour and perceptions changes by channel and retailer, and individual retailer<br />
objectives and priorities vary.<br />
180
Insight types & Common Applications<br />
Info/Insight type<br />
Common Applications<br />
Who<br />
(shopper types)<br />
Why<br />
(missions, occasions, motivations)<br />
When<br />
(they shop, how this varies)<br />
W<strong>here</strong><br />
(they go, look, select from )<br />
How<br />
(they shop – speed, ‘mode’, what impacts them and<br />
what doesn’t, decision making)<br />
What and How Many (basket items/AWOP, what they<br />
also bought)<br />
How much (spend levels, what drives it)<br />
Purchase decision hierarchy<br />
181<br />
Marketing to specific target audiences (consumer and shopper segments and clusters,<br />
per category and category segment)<br />
Occasion based marketing – messaging, bundled offers, gifts with purchase etc<br />
<strong>New</strong> products and packs to suit specific occasions<br />
Role of specific category segments and product types<br />
Role of price promotion and consumer promotion in sale conversion<br />
Daypart marketing – time of day and day of week tailored ranging, offers, and specials<br />
Seasonality opportunities<br />
W<strong>here</strong> to put displays (and w<strong>here</strong> not to – ‘dead zones’)<br />
Map path to purchase touchpoints – what’s important and what’s not<br />
Roles of each part of the store in influencing purchase (path to purchase) – what should<br />
go w<strong>here</strong> and how it should be messaged<br />
Purchase Decision Hierarchy – impacts on layouts, price, promotion<br />
Category definition and segmentation – what’s in the category, what the obvious<br />
product groups are<br />
Product portfolio gaps based on category segmentation<br />
Increases required in number of items purchased<br />
Bundles – most commonly combined items<br />
Spend increase opportunities cross-retailer and cross-channel segment<br />
Trade up opportunities based on pack size/format<br />
Ranging<br />
Layout<br />
Pack strategy<br />
Price and promotion strategy (role of price)
Shopper Research Applications (1)<br />
The following list is not exhaustive, but indicative …<br />
Range & Portfolio<br />
•Category definition and segmentation – portfolio gaps and opportunities<br />
•Pack changes<br />
•Pack formats and pack strategy<br />
•Brand/pack/product/price by occasion and channel<br />
Space & Layout<br />
•Purchase decision hierarchy –how shoppers make purchase decisions, in what<br />
order<br />
•What should go w<strong>here</strong> and next to what – location, adjacencies, flow, planograms<br />
Visibility & Display<br />
•Movement tracking –w<strong>here</strong> they go, what they see and don‟t see (w<strong>here</strong> to put<br />
stuff)<br />
•Greatest points of influence<br />
•Points of engagement priorities<br />
•Missions, occasions and needs – occasion based messaging (types of POS and<br />
what goes on them)<br />
•Execution diagrams for retailers and sales teams of what should go w<strong>here</strong><br />
•Types of POS that work best<br />
RSVP3 – instore sales drivers.<br />
182
Shopper Research Applications (2)<br />
Price<br />
• Price sensitivities and elasticities<br />
Promotion<br />
• Role, type and mechanics relevance<br />
Store staff persuasion<br />
• Role and opportunities for store personnel to<br />
influence purchase<br />
PAGE 183
Insight or merely Information?<br />
• What‟s the difference?<br />
184
Exercise: Determining Insight from Information<br />
• Use the information provided in the<br />
following slide<br />
• Determine some potential causes and<br />
reasons ... „what‟s going on <strong>here</strong> is ...‟<br />
• Determine what you think it means „so<br />
what this means is ...‟<br />
• Determine some potential actions ...<br />
„so what we need to do about it is ...‟<br />
185 Exercise total time: 20 minutes
Complete the above.<br />
Exercise: Determining Insight from Information<br />
Exercise<br />
Issue<br />
Information<br />
Insight<br />
Implication<br />
Implementation<br />
Bottleshop sales are static.<br />
•70% of bottleshop purchases are in single item baskets.<br />
•Shoppers on a mission – the one thing they come in for, they<br />
get and nothing else.<br />
So what‟s really going on is ………………………………<br />
This means that ………………………………………….<br />
So what we need to do is ………………………………
Exercise: One potential answer<br />
5Is Exercise: one potential answer<br />
Issue<br />
Information<br />
Insight<br />
Implication<br />
Implementation<br />
Bottleshop sales are static.<br />
•70% of bottleshop purchases are in single item baskets.<br />
•Shoppers on a mission – the one thing they come in for, they<br />
get and nothing else.<br />
Shoppers are not being upsold or offered impulse items<br />
Store staff are not being taught to upsell or incremental sell<br />
Develop and deliver a selling skills training program for store<br />
staff.
Shopper Research case studies
Case Study:<br />
Home Entertainment Shopper Behaviour<br />
Situation<br />
• DVD category growth has slowed<br />
• Category execution in-store immature and disorganised<br />
• Little Home Entertainment shopper behaviour information<br />
Task<br />
• Understand who DVD shoppers are (shopper segmentation)<br />
and how they shop the category – preferred segmentation,<br />
layout, pricing, ranging ... Cross channel and cross retailer<br />
Activity<br />
• Retailer interviews for upfront engagement<br />
• Accompanied shops, in-store observations and intercept<br />
interviews, online survey and TURF analysis<br />
• Retailer workshops (currently in train)<br />
• ... across 6 retailers in 3 channels<br />
5 stage methodology, topped and tailed with retailer workshops.
Case Study:<br />
Home Entertainment Shopper Behaviour<br />
Results to date<br />
• 5 shopper segments identified and valued<br />
• Execution recommendations against each<br />
shopper segment made<br />
• Retailer buy in to proposed new layouts in<br />
grocery<br />
• Retailer buy in to proposed new pricing<br />
scales achieved<br />
• Trial of core range and layout for „genre‟<br />
section plus staffing in a mass merchant<br />
• Subsequent rollout of core range in mass<br />
merchant<br />
• Mass merchant awards client „Home<br />
Entertainment Supplier of Year‟ for core<br />
range trials and rollout program
Case Study:<br />
Fresh Dairy Shopper Research<br />
Situation<br />
• Existing shopper information outdated, needed to be updated for<br />
acceptance by retailers<br />
• Category growth drivers had been identified but needed to be validated<br />
Task<br />
• Understand the 5Ws and 5Hs of VMS shoppers<br />
• Provide retailers with a case for change<br />
Activity<br />
• Retailer interviews for upfront engagement<br />
• Accompanied shops, in-store observations and intercept interviews, online<br />
survey with TURF analysis and layout preferences<br />
Results to date<br />
• <strong>New</strong> layouts being trialled in one retailer<br />
• Incorporated into strategic category plans (3-5 years) – including<br />
identification of a number of new category drivers<br />
5 stage methodology, topped and tailed with retailer workshops.
Case Study:<br />
Household Cleaning Portfolio Gaps<br />
Situation<br />
• Retailers threatening to delist low performing skus<br />
• Company had no category participation strategy – didn‟t know why they<br />
were t<strong>here</strong><br />
Task<br />
• Determine role of existing company products to category<br />
• Identify new product opportunities for growth<br />
Activity<br />
• Consumer ethnography – home immersions<br />
• Shopper U&A – accompanied shops<br />
• Consumer focus groups – consumer segmentation<br />
• Company category definition and segmentation exercise – using staff<br />
• Company consumer experience cleaning task exercise – using staff<br />
• Applications /NPD Workshop - for research results and staff exercises<br />
Combined shopper and consumer methodology.<br />
192
Case Study:<br />
Household Cleaning - Results<br />
Results<br />
• Identified two new cleaning segments:<br />
• „outdoor‟ and „specific purpose‟<br />
• Best new cleaning product launch of 2008 – BBQ Wipes („What‟s<br />
<strong>New</strong>‟):<br />
• most successful innovation for Selleys in a decade<br />
• increased ranging in key channels<br />
• Range of specific purpose cleaning products launched<br />
Selleys‟ reason for being in the cleaning category now clear.<br />
193
Case Study:<br />
POS execution in Cafes<br />
Situation<br />
• Client Company spending $millions on POS in cafes, but sales<br />
declining<br />
• Average POS spend per cafe $10K, mostly on external branding<br />
visibility pieces<br />
Task<br />
• Identify and prioritise points of engagement in cafes<br />
• Determine role of each point of engagement – brand equity vs sales<br />
driving vs customer ranging leverage tool<br />
Activity<br />
• Determine cafe types (inner city, coastal/tourist, suburban)<br />
• Depth interviews in situ – café user U&A, N=24<br />
• Observations, N = 250<br />
• Exit interviews, N = 60<br />
Prioritising the points of engagement.<br />
194
Case Study:<br />
POS in Cafes - Results<br />
Results<br />
• Saved company $3m in POS over 12 months<br />
• Sales increased more than 25% over 2 years (in<br />
conjunction with distribution increases)<br />
• Clearly defined , consistent „picture of success‟<br />
for sales teams to use<br />
• Subsequent new products launched with<br />
Mandatory POS – further cost savings<br />
Applied to all beverages and subsequent new product launches.<br />
195
Case study:<br />
Impulse alcohol RTD – Trial Support Research<br />
Situation<br />
•Retailer and supplier keen to invest in impulse fridges for RTDs at front of store - replicating<br />
„chocolate bar at the checkout‟ thinking in bottleshops<br />
•Trial of impulse fridges placed at counters, ranging Top 10 selling RTDs (category level)<br />
undertaken in 10 test and 10 „control‟ grocery attached liquor stores<br />
Task<br />
•Understand shopper awareness of and interaction with trial impulse beverage fridges<br />
Activity<br />
•Observations across 10 stores, N=1500<br />
•Exit interviews across 10 stores, N= 500<br />
•Interviews with buyers of trial beverage fridge, N=5 (low conversion rate)<br />
Result<br />
•Low levels of shopper awareness and interaction/purchase conversion with impulse units<br />
•Motivators of impulse purchase in bottleshops understood, including differences by channel<br />
segment – and why this trial t<strong>here</strong>fore didn‟t work<br />
•Improvements/changes required per channel segment and to range determined for future<br />
trials.<br />
Saved retailer and supplier $5m in capex investment. Trial failed, but we know why!<br />
196<br />
Trial units similar to this placed at counters. Units category branded, containing „alcopops‟.
Example Outputs
Least<br />
Category shopper typology:<br />
Often a combination of attitudinal and behavioural<br />
Price Sensitivity<br />
Highest<br />
Bargain<br />
Seekers<br />
Informed<br />
Channelswitchers<br />
Category Emotional Involvement<br />
In and Outs<br />
Most<br />
Recreational<br />
Shoppers<br />
Category<br />
Connoisseurs<br />
Lowest<br />
198<br />
Segmentation is only meaningful if how you need to execute per segment changes.
Linking shopper profiles to retail metrics<br />
Indicator<br />
Frequency<br />
Market Average<br />
30% 2-3 months<br />
28% monthly<br />
23% 2-3 weeks<br />
19% weekly or<br />
more<br />
Category<br />
Connoisseur<br />
Very High<br />
(weekly +)<br />
Informed<br />
Channel<br />
Switcher<br />
Med<br />
(1-3 weeks)<br />
In and Outs<br />
Medium – Low<br />
(2-3 weeks)<br />
Bargain Seekers<br />
Low<br />
(2-3 weeks or less)<br />
Recreational<br />
Shoppers<br />
Low<br />
(2-3 wks or less)<br />
Trips 3.4 5.5 3.4 3.0 2.7 3.2<br />
Spend $72.10 99.10 83.10 58.70 55.60 78.80<br />
AWOP 5.7 9.0 6.1 4.6 5.4 5.1<br />
W<strong>here</strong> instore<br />
Browses all points<br />
Shelves &<br />
secondary locations<br />
Looked on shelves<br />
quickly, asked<br />
service staff<br />
Specials displays<br />
Demonstrations,<br />
sampling, at shelf,<br />
secondary<br />
Degree of<br />
Planning<br />
32% knew brand<br />
30% impulse<br />
22% planned<br />
browse<br />
16% knew<br />
subcategory<br />
Over-index planned<br />
browse/buy<br />
Planned<br />
buy/browse<br />
Plan down to brand<br />
and product name<br />
Impulse<br />
Browse, impulse<br />
Who for (overindex<br />
skews)<br />
42% me<br />
17% me & partner<br />
12% kids<br />
9% whole family<br />
14% partner or<br />
colleague<br />
Family Others Me Me Us<br />
• Over-Index<br />
• Under-Index<br />
199
Shopper segment quantification<br />
Segment X Males Females<br />
Segment 4 Segment 3<br />
Segment 2 Segment 1<br />
• Fashion not really important<br />
to them<br />
• Feel a bit „out of touch‟<br />
• Don‟t pay much attention to<br />
brand<br />
8%<br />
17%<br />
8%<br />
5%<br />
Segmen<br />
t X, 41%<br />
23%<br />
42%<br />
10%<br />
38%<br />
15%<br />
• Don‟t really like shopping<br />
21%<br />
18%<br />
17%<br />
38%<br />
Segment Size<br />
Share of Spend<br />
Each type profiled and quantified – by retailer<br />
200
Shopper profiling: who‟s in the store<br />
Instore obs and interviews. Store, dept, category levels<br />
Gender Age Lifestage<br />
Male,<br />
38%<br />
50+ yo,<br />
23%<br />
16-34<br />
yo, 38%<br />
Kids<br />
38%<br />
Female,<br />
62%<br />
35-49<br />
yo,33%<br />
No kids,<br />
61%<br />
We generally find in grocery that households without kids number those with … further to the „MGB myth‟<br />
201
Occasions vs trip types (missions)<br />
When Eaten<br />
Trip type<br />
For dessert(after dinner)<br />
With breakfast<br />
Mid morning<br />
33%<br />
31%<br />
30%<br />
4%<br />
3% 3% 2%<br />
Routine stock-up<br />
Mid afternoon<br />
30%<br />
Top up<br />
Evening snack<br />
With lunch<br />
19%<br />
28%<br />
14%<br />
Dinner tonight<br />
Late afternoon<br />
17%<br />
Destination X<br />
As breakfast<br />
16%<br />
After lunch<br />
As lunch<br />
Mixed into dessert<br />
16%<br />
12%<br />
11%<br />
74%<br />
Destination other<br />
Don't know<br />
All other occasions<br />
12%<br />
0% 10% 20% 30% 40%<br />
202
Retailer Preference & channel choice:<br />
Example Accomp shops, online, instore<br />
Purchased most from*<br />
Grocery<br />
WW<br />
26<br />
46%<br />
Mass<br />
Coles<br />
26<br />
IGA<br />
11<br />
Specialist<br />
Aldi<br />
8<br />
22%<br />
Convenience<br />
Harris Farm<br />
5<br />
10%<br />
Pharmacy<br />
Thomas Dux<br />
3<br />
4%<br />
1%<br />
Deli<br />
3<br />
17%<br />
Other<br />
Other Specialty<br />
3<br />
Channel<br />
0 10 20 30<br />
203
Retailer perceptions:<br />
Store, category, dept level. Online survey & instore. Specific per retailer.<br />
Easy to shop<br />
Good service<br />
Helpful staff<br />
Enjoyable to shop<br />
Has the latest new releases<br />
Has a good loyalty program<br />
Has new release movies<br />
available earlier<br />
Good returns policy<br />
Has a lot of new release movies<br />
Good value for money<br />
Has hard to find DVD titles<br />
Has cheap sale tables/bins<br />
Wide range of DVD’s<br />
Always has DVD’s I want in<br />
Cheapest price<br />
stock<br />
Good promotions<br />
204
Reasons for retailer choice<br />
Q. What influenced your choice of XXX as YYY retailer today? (%)<br />
100 Price<br />
80<br />
60<br />
71<br />
47 46 46<br />
Proximity<br />
Preferred<br />
Retailer<br />
Range<br />
40<br />
20<br />
0<br />
26 25<br />
18<br />
Advertising<br />
<strong>New</strong> Products<br />
Catalogue<br />
205
Quantified behaviours (eg Frequency):<br />
Online, some instore<br />
QS6 - How often go XXX shopping by Store?<br />
Retailer Big WX<br />
2<br />
5<br />
14<br />
26<br />
30<br />
23<br />
More than three times a<br />
week<br />
Three times a week<br />
Mass Average<br />
2<br />
7<br />
17<br />
25<br />
25<br />
22<br />
Twice a week<br />
Once a week<br />
Specialty Average<br />
4<br />
8<br />
15<br />
20<br />
26<br />
25<br />
Once every 2-3 weeks<br />
Once a month<br />
Total Market<br />
2<br />
5<br />
11<br />
24<br />
28<br />
29<br />
Once every 2-3 months<br />
0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100%<br />
Nearly half are buying more than once every 2-3 weeks.<br />
206
Observations: Shopper pathways<br />
And directional flows, example below<br />
Chilled Categories<br />
Milk<br />
Seafood<br />
Nett Headcount<br />
Grocery, 73%<br />
40%<br />
5%<br />
Sea<br />
Food<br />
Aisles<br />
Aisles<br />
Aisles<br />
Aisles<br />
Aisles<br />
40%<br />
Fresh fruit<br />
& veg,<br />
Chilled foods<br />
Nett Headcount<br />
Fresh , 27%<br />
Frozens<br />
Aisles<br />
Aisles<br />
Aisles<br />
Aisles<br />
7%<br />
Aisles<br />
Deli<br />
6%<br />
2%<br />
Check<br />
out<br />
Check<br />
out<br />
Check<br />
out<br />
Check<br />
out<br />
Service<br />
Desk<br />
Bakery<br />
207
Observations: Traffic hotspots<br />
COOL ROOM<br />
CHILLED<br />
WINE<br />
NARTD<br />
BOTTLE BEERS<br />
BEER SLABS<br />
WINE<br />
WINE<br />
NARTD<br />
• Other formats:<br />
• Heat maps<br />
• Spaghetti maps<br />
• Uses:<br />
RTDS<br />
• Display hot spots<br />
• Instore media placement<br />
BEER SLABS<br />
WINE<br />
SPECIALS<br />
COUNTER<br />
• Dead area identification<br />
(w<strong>here</strong> NOT to put<br />
things)<br />
ENTRY<br />
RTD<br />
SLABS<br />
EXIT<br />
208
Traffic, browse, buy metrics:<br />
Is your category opportunity in more traffic, or more conversion?<br />
(@ 66 hours in total)<br />
166 per hour or<br />
2.7 shoppers per minute<br />
TOTAL CATEGORY TRAFFIC<br />
10,997<br />
33 out of 166 per hour browse<br />
BROWSE<br />
2235<br />
20.3%<br />
In-store influences on Purchase<br />
Instore interviews<br />
Q.To what extent have the following influenced your purchase just now? (%)<br />
100<br />
Price<br />
80<br />
Specials Displays<br />
64<br />
Range<br />
60<br />
49<br />
Organised Layout<br />
40<br />
39 38 37<br />
Product in Stock<br />
20<br />
25<br />
22<br />
18<br />
<strong>New</strong> Products<br />
Promotions<br />
0<br />
Staff<br />
210
Promotion Mechanics<br />
• Can be tested in online surveys and instore<br />
• Online a number of mechanics can be compared against each other/ranked for a<br />
specific category, eg for each mechanic:<br />
Visit store to investigate offer<br />
Likely impact on last purchase<br />
Definitely would 5<br />
Probably would 4<br />
Might/Might not 3<br />
Probably not 2<br />
Definitely not 1<br />
Would not have any impact on what I bought 1<br />
I would probably have bought more XXX than I did 2<br />
I would probably have bought one of the promoted<br />
XXXs instead of a XXX I purchased<br />
3<br />
Can‟t say 4<br />
211
212<br />
Insight to application examples
International: The „Old Spice Guy‟<br />
• Insight: 75% of men‟s body wash<br />
purchase by women buying „lady scents‟<br />
for guys. Need to bring „virility‟ to men‟s<br />
body wash<br />
• Activation: „I‟m the man your man should<br />
smell like‟, „Smell like a man, man‟ viral<br />
marketing campaign (YouTube, TV, social<br />
media)<br />
• Results: campaign increased sales by<br />
27% over 6 months since launching (year<br />
on year) and sales up 55% over 3 months.<br />
Old Spice now #1 body wash brand for<br />
men. Rejuvenated the category.<br />
213
Some international activations based on insights<br />
• Insight: Shopper research identified that<br />
shoppers determine laundry detergent<br />
purchase by smelling the product<br />
• Activation: Gain „Love at First Sniff‟<br />
activation<br />
Situation: In the Philippines,<br />
deodorant HHPen 33%, much less<br />
than rest of world. Deodorant was<br />
placed next to fragrance in<br />
Supermarket aisle<br />
Insight: Consumer barrier (belief) that<br />
„showers keep me fresh all day, I don‟t<br />
need a deodorant‟<br />
Activation: Shopper solution – „keep<br />
fresh all day‟ bay next to shower gels<br />
Result: HH Pen increased 6%,<br />
growing still<br />
214
International: Diageo Simply Cocktails<br />
• Insight: Women are the primary shoppers for<br />
spirits and liquors. Big events (parties, Xmas)<br />
are the minority of spirits consumption<br />
occasions, „everyday‟ minor occasions are a<br />
bigger opportunity.<br />
• Opportunity: make „infrequent purchasers‟ of<br />
spirits more frequent through promoting<br />
everyday spirits and cocktail occasions.<br />
• Activation: Modular „Simply Cocktails‟ unit.<br />
Three adjacent displays of different types of<br />
spirits, soft drinks and other complementary<br />
products. Each comprises a particular “level of<br />
difficulty” for shoppers who want to make<br />
cocktails. “Ready/Pour” is one, “Simple Mix” is<br />
the next step up, and “Easy Shake” is the<br />
highest level.<br />
• Results: average 11% return across the Diageo<br />
brands involved<br />
215
Exercise: Build a Shopper Insights Brief<br />
• Use the template provided<br />
• The shopper research brief needs to be for<br />
your team‟s selected product / category in the<br />
selected channels<br />
• Is it a specific or diagnostic brief?<br />
• What are the key things you need to<br />
understand about your category‟s shoppers in<br />
order to market to them instore and out of<br />
store?<br />
• Build an engagement plan and<br />
strategy/actions workshopping plan for the<br />
outcomes – both internally and with<br />
manufacturer/retailer stakeholders<br />
216 Exercise total time: 45 minutes
7. Measurement and ROI<br />
It‟s a bit like that famous advertising quote:<br />
“we know half is working, just not which half …”<br />
217
Module 7: Content Coverage<br />
Measurement and ROI<br />
1. What to measure in SM – against initiative objectives<br />
2. Short term vs Long term cumulative measurement and<br />
tracking<br />
3. Types of measures<br />
4. Exercise: Implications for what and how I need to start<br />
measuring in my company<br />
218
Who is measuring what? SM Survey results<br />
Q. Which, if any, of your company’s Shopper Marketing activities, are measured?<br />
N =134<br />
40%<br />
35%<br />
30%<br />
25%<br />
20%<br />
15%<br />
10%<br />
5%<br />
0%<br />
Which types of activities being employed is reflected in the effectiveness rankings for activity<br />
types. The less utilised activities rate lower in effectiveness as fewer are using them and thus<br />
fewer understand their impact.<br />
219
Activity effectiveness ratings: SM Survey (subjective)<br />
Q. How would you rate the effectiveness of the following Shopper Marketing activities?<br />
80%<br />
70%<br />
60%<br />
50%<br />
40%<br />
30%<br />
20%<br />
10%<br />
0%<br />
Displays POP/POS Catalogue Experiential Loyalty<br />
programs<br />
In Store Media<br />
Out of store<br />
media<br />
Social Media<br />
Digital/online<br />
However, the fact the rankings of In-store Media and Experiential reflect the „shopper begins before store‟<br />
opinions see earlier. Social and Digital areas of opportunity – not tried much yet.<br />
220
Activity measures applied: SM Survey<br />
Q. Which, if any, of the following measures apply to your company?<br />
90%<br />
80%<br />
70%<br />
60%<br />
50%<br />
40%<br />
30%<br />
20%<br />
10%<br />
0%<br />
Most looking at outcomes (Sales) and ROI (spend vs result) with other measures not really being explored.<br />
Similar story in the USA.<br />
221
Measure types: Retailer business measures<br />
Business Level<br />
• Gross Margin<br />
• Rolled up margin<br />
• Fifth margin (includes<br />
store margin and terms,<br />
nett of waste)<br />
• GMROI – occasionally<br />
(internal measure)<br />
• ROCE<br />
• ROI is internal<br />
• Down to 3 decimal points!<br />
Store Level<br />
• Achieve Sales targets<br />
(sales per metre, GP per<br />
metre)<br />
• Achieve GP%, shrinkage<br />
targets<br />
• Achieve Wage Spend<br />
targets<br />
• Out of stocks<br />
• Customer Service<br />
• OH&S<br />
Manufacturers invest in retailers, not the other way around.<br />
222
Measurement types: Promotions<br />
Sales<br />
Sales volume & value uplifts/decline<br />
Baseline vs on-promotion sales<br />
Category growth value / volume, residual effects<br />
Market<br />
Market share changes<br />
Cannibalisation rates<br />
Product/brand switch<br />
Behaviour<br />
AWOP<br />
Day and time of purchase shifts<br />
Purchase and re-purchase frequency
Measurement types: Tangible vs Intangible<br />
Tangible Measures<br />
Intangible Measures<br />
1. Incremental sales generated<br />
2. Payback<br />
3. Consumer market share<br />
4. Customer instore support /<br />
implementation<br />
5. Shifts in consumption drivers<br />
6. Retailer value analysis<br />
7. Relative cost effectiveness<br />
1. Brand attributes<br />
2. Consumer / shopper attitudes<br />
3. Trade Reaction and relationships<br />
gains<br />
4. Retail Operations feedback<br />
5. <strong>New</strong>s / PR / impact<br />
6. Internal departmental feedback<br />
7. Supplier feedback<br />
8. Operation Distribution impact
Measure Types: POP drivers (1)<br />
Range:<br />
• Distribution/existence of specific<br />
products,<br />
• % of core range on shelf,<br />
• <strong>New</strong> product distribution<br />
Space:<br />
• Shelf share of total category<br />
• Shelf share of sub categories<br />
• # facings<br />
• Set to planogram<br />
Displays:<br />
• How many<br />
• Of what type<br />
• In what location<br />
• What‟s on them<br />
Visibility:<br />
• POS & signage placement<br />
• how many<br />
• Of what type<br />
• W<strong>here</strong><br />
Based on what the shopper sees. NOT the retailer scorecard.
Measure Types: POP drivers (2)<br />
Price:<br />
• Price points of specific products (ours,<br />
competitors)<br />
Promotion:<br />
• What is on promotion<br />
• How many promotions are t<strong>here</strong><br />
• What the mechanic is<br />
• How it is supported<br />
Staff:<br />
• Training carried out,<br />
• Persuasion technique being activated,<br />
• Apparel being worn<br />
Asset type:<br />
• For depreciable permanent assets eg<br />
fixtures,<br />
• What type is it<br />
• How many are t<strong>here</strong>
So, t<strong>here</strong> are a lot of different<br />
types of things I could measure.<br />
So what?<br />
227
Determine what your promotion/activity is meant to do upfront<br />
Sounds obvious, but „GIGO‟ (garbage in, garbage out) applies. Get clear on your objectives<br />
upfront. You might want to increase sales by getting trial or increasing awareness, but what are<br />
the levers for achieving this?<br />
Who is your promotion<br />
designed to attract?<br />
What shopper behaviours do<br />
you want your activity to<br />
impact?<br />
What are your retail<br />
objectives?<br />
• Loyal brand buyers<br />
(AWOP/frequency based)<br />
• Occasional buyers<br />
(frequency based)<br />
• <strong>New</strong> consumers (trial<br />
based)<br />
• Frequency<br />
• AWOP<br />
• Increase spend<br />
• Trial<br />
• Brand switch<br />
• Build loyalty<br />
• Penetration<br />
• Awareness<br />
• Drive traffic<br />
• Increase frequency<br />
• Increase spend<br />
• Improve basket<br />
penetration.<br />
228
Different stages of measurement<br />
Output Impact & Influence Outcome<br />
What we did<br />
What shoppers noticed<br />
How they behaved<br />
Results: sales and<br />
retail/shopper<br />
behavioural objectives<br />
Currently 229 more focus on outcome, and sometimes on output but impact/influence still little understood.
Outputs: what we did<br />
• Execution provides the context for the<br />
scope and effort put into the promotion.<br />
Output measures include things like:<br />
• Number of stores executing the promotion<br />
• Number of displays achieved<br />
• Support mechanism employed eg shelf<br />
ticketing, advertising, catalogue, mobile/text<br />
marketing, social media, POS, news/PR.<br />
Third party merchandising/field audit teams can<br />
gather the instore data.<br />
230
Impact & Influence<br />
What actually happened? A number of angles to consider <strong>here</strong>.<br />
Shopper Behaviour<br />
Consumer/Brand<br />
Market<br />
Store & Trade<br />
• Frequency/IPI, AWOP,<br />
traffic, spend, basket<br />
penetration, basket value<br />
• Time of day and day of<br />
week purchase shifts<br />
• Product/brand switch<br />
• What did they actually<br />
notice/which execution<br />
elements influenced<br />
them?<br />
• Brand health measures<br />
up/down (yes you might<br />
have sold more, but<br />
particularly if at deep<br />
discount what impact did<br />
it have on the brand?)<br />
• Price point perceptions<br />
for the brand (constant<br />
promotion at discount<br />
price point resets price<br />
benchmarks in<br />
shoppers‟ heads,<br />
leading to deflation)<br />
• Changes in<br />
consumption (short and<br />
medium term)<br />
• Manufacturer/brand share<br />
shifts within category<br />
• Cannibalisation of other<br />
products, brands,<br />
category segments (this is<br />
a function of high levels of<br />
substitutability/low brand<br />
loyalty)<br />
• Out of stocks<br />
• Level of instore support<br />
received (ie distribution,<br />
displays)<br />
• Retailer impact<br />
• Supplier impact<br />
• Operation Distribution.<br />
231
Outcomes<br />
What difference did the promotion make to our numbers?<br />
Both sales and profitability measures apply <strong>here</strong>.<br />
• Sales measures:<br />
• Sales vol and val uplift/decline – brand,<br />
category<br />
• Baseline vs sales on promo –<br />
incremental sales generated<br />
• Category growth volume/value<br />
• Residual sales level post promotion (is it<br />
higher or lower than pre-promotion?<br />
Lower would indicate you‟ve pulled sales<br />
forward)<br />
• Profitability:<br />
• Product/brand/category profitability<br />
during promotion<br />
• ROI/payback based on inputs<br />
(execution): to the brand/manufacturer,<br />
to the retailer<br />
• Cost effectiveness compared to other<br />
promotions and activity types.<br />
Having selected your measures from the above, when compiling promotion analysis you would then provide recommendations on<br />
whether the activity is worth running again, and if so what elements would need to be changed for an improved result.<br />
232
Missing Metrics on P2P: Booz 2009<br />
233
Building Better Measurement: Booz 2009<br />
234
Exercise: Measurement and ROI<br />
• Looking at your proposed product<br />
launch campaigns, what would you<br />
measure for each, based on your<br />
objectives?<br />
• THEN, individually: note implications<br />
for what and how I need to start<br />
measuring in my company<br />
235 Exercise total time: 45 minutes
8. Integrating Shopper Marketing<br />
See also case studies:<br />
Barilla, Campbell‟s Soup, Diageo<br />
236
Module 8: Content Coverage<br />
Integrating Shopper Marketing<br />
1. Building shopper marketing intro strategic planning processes<br />
2. Shopper Marketing implications for resourcing – Headcounts, Budgets and<br />
Organizational structure<br />
3. Manufacturer and Retailer collaboration on shopper marketing<br />
4. Exercise: What needs to change in my business from now<br />
237
Setting up for success<br />
Shopper Marketing is not bolt-on tactics, it needs to be integrated as a way of working.<br />
Support and<br />
Commitment<br />
Resources Processes Relationships<br />
•Executive support<br />
•Increased<br />
resource pledge<br />
•Right structure<br />
•Enough<br />
headcount<br />
•Separate budget<br />
(activations and<br />
insights)<br />
•Right structure<br />
•Enough<br />
headcount<br />
•Separate budget<br />
(activations and<br />
insights)<br />
•Integrated with<br />
consumer<br />
marketing<br />
•Retailer and<br />
manufacturer<br />
collaboration<br />
238 More detail on these in the <strong>POPAI</strong> Shopper Marketing Council Roadmaps.
Key Shopper Marketing Best Practices: Booz 2010<br />
239
SM as Strategic Capability: Booz 2009<br />
240
A 7-step roadmap for effective shopper marketing<br />
1. Understand your corporate and marketing strategies<br />
2. Determine who to play with<br />
3. Understand retailers‟ business situation<br />
4. Understand retailers‟ objectives and strategies<br />
5. Understand your shoppers<br />
6. Develop shopper marketing strategy as part of account plans<br />
7. Execution and measurement.<br />
241<br />
Source: Desmedt, Luc ‘ Seven steps toward effective shopper marketing’; in ‘Shopper Marketing: How to increase purchase decisions at the point of sale’, Markus<br />
Stahlberg Ed, Ville Maila, 2010 Pgs 21-27
Investment matrix: advertising and deals<br />
242
Investment matrix: digital platforms<br />
243
And a final word ...<br />
Learnings to Date: Hints and Tips<br />
As a way of understanding the experience of those on the Shopper Marketing journey, we asked<br />
interviewees in the <strong>Australia</strong>n shopper marketing survey what advice, dos and don‟ts they would give to<br />
someone starting out in the discipline ... if they‟d have had their time over again, what would they have done<br />
differently? Some of the common responses included:<br />
Dos<br />
Invest in shopper insights and understanding upfront to<br />
engage customers and direct activities. Mix your data<br />
sources<br />
Educate the internal and retailer businesses on different<br />
measures<br />
Focus outward (not internally), and on the big stuff – 1-2<br />
major initiatives to get the business or retailer engaged.<br />
Understand both retailer and manufacturer strategies and<br />
KPIs<br />
Use all internal inputs ... everyone is a shopper and good<br />
ideas can often come from areas like Operations. Look at<br />
other categories and markets for ideas<br />
Develop a set of standards based on clear objectives that<br />
can be used for most initiatives<br />
Get out to stores and see for yourself what shoppers are<br />
actually doing (don‟t just sit in the office hypothesizing).<br />
Don‟ts<br />
Overanalyse and get analysis paralysis ... use common<br />
sense<br />
Just look at ROI vs. spend. Use a variety of measures<br />
Underestimate the amount of time it will take to get an<br />
initiative up and running. However much time you think it<br />
will take, double it<br />
Limit ideas ... no idea is a bad idea<br />
244
Exercise: Integrating Shopper Marketing<br />
Individual exercise:<br />
• Plot w<strong>here</strong> your company sits in the<br />
shopper marketing journey using the tool<br />
provided.<br />
• Identify what your company needs to do<br />
now and next in order to maintain<br />
momentum ... What needs to change in<br />
my business from now?<br />
245 Exercise total time: 10 minutes
247<br />
APPENDICES
Glossary of Common Terms: A-D<br />
Term<br />
Abandonment<br />
AWOP<br />
Basket Data (Basket View)<br />
Basket Incidence (Penetration)<br />
Basket Size<br />
Basket Value (Transaction Value)<br />
Deferral<br />
Definition<br />
When a shopper doesn‟t make a planned product purchase due to it being out of stock , unable to be found or<br />
inability to „read‟ the shelf layout. Abandonment can occur at product, category, aisle or store level.<br />
Average Weight of Purchase. Refers to number of items bought in the category, or weight in kilograms or litres.<br />
Data indicating all items purchased in a given shopping transaction – all items in the shopper basket. Shows<br />
what was bought with what.<br />
What % of shopper baskets your category or product goes into.<br />
How many items in the shopping basket at checkout<br />
Total $ value of all items in the basket<br />
When a shopper delays a purchase to a later date. Often due to out of stocks or to waiting for a promotion price<br />
or to<br />
DIFOT Delivery In Full and On Time. Key retailer service level measure. DIFOT measures are usually minimum 90%<br />
Dwell time<br />
How long a shopper spends at shelf/in aisle/in the store. Long dwell times can be a sign of either category<br />
engagement, or confusion.<br />
248
Glossary of Common Terms: F-N<br />
Term<br />
Frequency<br />
Definition<br />
The number of times your category is shopped over a defined period of time ie frequency may be 2.5 times per week<br />
GM Gross Margin (%)<br />
GSR<br />
Homescan (Shopperscan)<br />
Household Penetration (HHPen)<br />
Hurdle Rates<br />
Incremental<br />
Inter Purchase Interval (IPI)<br />
Mission (Trip Type)<br />
NSR<br />
Gross Sales Revenue<br />
Shopper at-home pantry data collected from a panel of shoppers (commonly by Nielsen or Aztec) w<strong>here</strong>by shoppers<br />
scan items when they get them home from whichever channel of purchase. Typically includes HH Penetration,<br />
AWOP, Frequency/IPI, Spend, Incidence data.<br />
What % of households your category, category segment or product is in (based on Homescan panel data)<br />
Sales per week of a given product / sku in a given store. Retailers often have a minimum hurdle rate that a product<br />
has to achieved to stay stocked. Also referred to as AWS (average weekly sales) or UPSPW (units per store per<br />
week).<br />
Additional purchase, often unplanned and sometimes the result of store staff persuasive sell<br />
The time between shopping trips to buy a category or product (inverse of frequency). Ie quarterly.<br />
The type of shopping trip the shopper is on. Trip types change by channel and include Stock Up, Top Up, Dinner<br />
Tonight, Entertaining, Gifting, Destination, Services.<br />
Net Sales Revenue (sales revenue less operating costs).
Glossary of Common Terms: O-T<br />
Term<br />
Occasion<br />
One in, One out<br />
Out of stocks (OOS)<br />
Pantry Stocking<br />
POP/POS<br />
Scan Data<br />
SKU<br />
SRP/SFP<br />
Substitution<br />
Switch<br />
Traffic (Footfall)<br />
Definition<br />
The reason why a shopper is in the store – what they are shopping for . Occasion types include Gifting (eg Xmas,<br />
Mother‟s Day), Consumption (eg breakfast, lunch, dinner), Ethnic/Religious/Commemorative (eg Anzac Day),<br />
Seasonal (eg Summer, cold & flu), and Events/Sporting (eg footy finals).<br />
Because shelf space is limited and finite, when a new product is ranged an existing product needs to come out of the<br />
shelf layout.<br />
When a product is not physically available on shelf or in store, despite being ticketed at shelf.<br />
Also referred to as „pulling sales forward‟. When a promotion of an item, particularly of bulk packs, results in a<br />
shopper‟s at-home stockpile which takes a while to get through t<strong>here</strong>by reducing re-purchase frequency.<br />
Point of Purchase, Point of Sale. POP generally means store, POS generally means merchandising materials such<br />
as posters, header cards, shelf ticketing etc.<br />
Actual sales data recorded as it goes across the checkout, usually by Nielsen, Aztec, GFK. Includes what, when,<br />
how much (spend). Recorded at an individual item/category level.<br />
Stock Keeping Unit. Refers to an individual size, format and colour/flavour of something eg Sprite 600ml PET is one<br />
SKU, Sprite 1L PET is another SKU.<br />
Shelf ready packaging or Shelf friendly packaging . Packaging that includes branded trays that the product sits on for<br />
easy offloading from pallets onto the shelf.<br />
When a shopper changes their planned product purchase to another product, normally due to out of stocks or a<br />
promotion.<br />
When a shopper changes from one planned brand/product to another, often due to a promotion, persuasive point of<br />
sale or display materials, or store sales staff recommendation<br />
How many shoppers enter the store/aisle/category over a defined period of time.
References<br />
PRIMARY REFERENCES<br />
• Booz & Company/GMA 2009: “Shopper Marketing<br />
3.0 - Unleashing the Next Wave of Value”<br />
• Booz & Company/GMA 2010: “Shopper Marketing<br />
4.0 - Building Scalable Playbooks That Drive<br />
Results”<br />
• ShopAbility/<strong>POPAI</strong> <strong>Australia</strong> & NZ 2010: “Shopper<br />
Marketing: The Journey Begins”<br />
• “Shopper Marketing Best Practices: A Collaborative<br />
Model for Retailers and Manufacturers”, Retail<br />
Commission for Shopper Marketing, April 16, 2010<br />
FURTHER READING:<br />
• “Delivering the Promise of Shopper Marketing:<br />
Mastering Execution for Competitive Advantage”<br />
GMA/Deloitte, 2008<br />
• “Shopper Marketing: Capturing a Shopper‟s Heart,<br />
Mind and Wallet”, GMA/Deloitte, 2007<br />
• “Interscope Survey finds Shopper Marketing slowly<br />
catching on” May 03, 2010. Available via the<br />
Instore Marketing Institute (membership required)<br />
• “Ramping up Shopper Marketing Capability”.<br />
(Audio Included) June 04, 2010. Available via the<br />
Instore Marketing Institute (membership required).<br />
• “Times & Trends: The Next Generation of Shopper<br />
Marketing”, Symphony IRI, July 18 2010. Available<br />
via the Instore Marketing Institute (membership<br />
required)<br />
• “Shopper Marketing: how to increase purchase<br />
decisions at the point of sale”; Markus Stahlberg,<br />
Ville Maila, 2010<br />
251<br />
Plus a number of books on shopper marketing, best practice retailing and<br />
shopper/consumer psychology available on Amazon.com
With interest in the usage of digital and electronic instore POP<br />
Using<br />
Considering<br />
50%<br />
45%<br />
40%<br />
35%<br />
30%<br />
25%<br />
20%<br />
15%<br />
10%<br />
5%<br />
0%<br />
Not much is being used - top 6 forms between 10% and 30%.<br />
Interest lies in the interactive stuff rather than funky projections and holograms.<br />
252<br />
N - 134
<strong>New</strong> and emerging instore marketing techniques (SM Survey)<br />
Q. Thinking about new/emerging in-store marketing techniques which of the following<br />
are you aware of and/or considering using?<br />
80%<br />
70%<br />
60%<br />
50%<br />
40%<br />
30%<br />
20%<br />
10%<br />
0%<br />
Aware<br />
Considering<br />
For digital and electronic POP activations, the consideration rate is above the current rate of use, which is encouraging.<br />
Interest lies more in the interactive applications than in projections and holograms, although the latter are certainly<br />
considered to have „wow‟ factor and interruption capability.<br />
253<br />
N = 134
<strong>New</strong> and emerging SM techniques - digital<br />
Q. Thinking about digital and electronic in-store Point-of-Purchase (POP) material/s,<br />
which of the following are you using or considering?<br />
Using<br />
Considering<br />
50%<br />
45%<br />
40%<br />
35%<br />
30%<br />
25%<br />
20%<br />
15%<br />
10%<br />
5%<br />
0%<br />
Screens/digital<br />
signage<br />
In-store<br />
networks/TV<br />
Interactive<br />
kiosks<br />
Mobile<br />
marketing<br />
Interactive<br />
signage<br />
Interactive<br />
window<br />
displays<br />
Video walls Holograms Other None of the<br />
above<br />
N = 134<br />
254