29.05.2014 Views

Living + Magazine Issue 1 - Positive Living BC

Living + Magazine Issue 1 - Positive Living BC

Living + Magazine Issue 1 - Positive Living BC

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

DIAGNOSTICS<br />

Ultrasensitive viral load<br />

test now available in <strong>BC</strong><br />

by DAN O’NEILL, TREATMENT<br />

INFORMATION PROGRAM<br />

A new viral load test available in <strong>BC</strong> will<br />

now allow your doctor to measure the<br />

presence of HIV even when it reaches<br />

extremely low levels. Until now, when<br />

someone’s viral load dropped below 400<br />

copies/ML, the current viral load tests<br />

would indicate that the HIV virus was<br />

“detectable but unquantifiable”.<br />

With the introduction of the Roche<br />

Amplicor Ultrasensitivetest, HIV viral<br />

loads as low as 50 copies/mL can be<br />

measured. The new test may also give a<br />

count that is “detectable but unquantifiable”<br />

which would presumably be<br />

some number below 50 copies/mL.<br />

The greater sensitivity of<br />

the new test may give people<br />

an earlier indication of<br />

how effectively their drug<br />

regimen is reducing virus in<br />

the blood. Even if the viral<br />

load is below detection in the blood, it<br />

does not mean the virus has been eliminated<br />

nor does it tell you that the virus<br />

has been cleared from other sites such<br />

as lymph nodes.<br />

The overall accuracy of the count is<br />

the same as for the old test, so changes<br />

of less than 0.5 log (a three-fold difference)<br />

should not be considered significant.<br />

As with any test in HIV where there<br />

are few medical decisions that are timecritical,<br />

so you should be careful about<br />

making a significant change in therapy<br />

on the basis of one test result. Rather,<br />

look for a trend over several tests.<br />

If you had several counts below 400<br />

with the old test and then get a detectable<br />

count of, say, 200 with the<br />

Ultrasensitive test, what does that mean?<br />

Dr. Richard Harrigan who heads the<br />

Virology Laboratory at the Centre for<br />

Excellence cautions against reading too<br />

much into one detectable reading between<br />

50 to 400 after have several tests<br />

below quantification with the old test.<br />

There are several possibilities: (1) your<br />

viral load hasn’t changed but the test<br />

can now count it because it’s between<br />

50 and 400; (2) with the test being accurate<br />

only to within 0.5 log (a 3-fold<br />

difference), it may reflect the test variability<br />

rather than a reduction in drug<br />

efficacy; (3) your viral load might have<br />

been higher on the day you took the test<br />

because you’d forgotten to take all your<br />

medicines or diarrhea and vomiting had<br />

reduced the amount of drug in your<br />

The greater sensitivity of the<br />

new test may give people an earlier<br />

indication of how effectively their drug<br />

regimen is reducing the virus in the blood.<br />

body; or (4) it is an early warning of a<br />

reduction of efficacy of your drug regimen.<br />

Dr. Harrigan says there are three reasons<br />

why viral loads become detectable<br />

on therapy or never reach undetectability<br />

on therapy. If the pretreatment<br />

viral load was high, the combination of<br />

three drugs might not have the potency<br />

to reduce the count to below 50. For<br />

example, if your viral load was 200,000<br />

and each drug you took reduced the<br />

virus in your plasma by ten fold, three<br />

drugs would reduce it to 200, detectable<br />

on the new test but below quantification<br />

on the old. The second reason is<br />

pharmacokinetic – the way the drug is<br />

absorbed and metabolized in your body.<br />

If the dose is too low, if the drug is poorly<br />

absorbed due to drug or food interactions<br />

or to vomiting and diarrhea, if the<br />

drug is cleared from your body too<br />

quickly due to drug interactions or idiosyncratic<br />

metabolism, or if you forget<br />

to take your drugs, then there will be<br />

inadequate levels of drug in your body<br />

to inhibit adequately the growth of the<br />

virus. This situation may be important<br />

in the development of the third reason<br />

for viralogical failure of a regimen,<br />

which is viral drug resistance. If the virus<br />

has become drug resistance, then<br />

viral load is likely to increase over time,<br />

whereas pharmacokinetic and drug potency<br />

issues causing viralogical failure<br />

probably won’t show a trend to significantly<br />

increased viral load until resistance<br />

sets in. Selection for drug resistance<br />

occurs when the virus is replicating<br />

in the presence of one or more<br />

drugs.<br />

Resistance to one of the three drugs<br />

in a regimen could cause viral load to<br />

increase by 1 log (ten fold) without a<br />

return to pretreatment virus levels.<br />

Drug resistance occurs quickly with the<br />

non-nucleoside reverse transcriptase<br />

inhibitors and 3TC and slowly with the<br />

other reverse transcriptase inhibitors<br />

and the protease inhibitors. If your viral<br />

load goes from 100 to 400 to 1500<br />

and adherence has not been a problem,<br />

then you may want to talk to your doctor<br />

about switching drugs. If your viral<br />

load consistently hovers in the 50 – 400<br />

range and you’ve taken your drugs as<br />

prescribed, the advantage to switching<br />

to try to achieve an “undetectable” result<br />

would depend on factors such as<br />

pretreatment viral load, previous use of<br />

other antiretrovirals and other issues<br />

such as dosing regimens and side effects<br />

of the new regimen. On the positive<br />

side, people show good clinical results<br />

on therapy for quite some time even if<br />

their viral load has not gone below detection.<br />

JULY/AUGUST 1999 • LIVING + 25

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!