02.06.2014 Views

Newsletter 107 - October 2011 - (pdf - 0.6 MB) - Psi-k

Newsletter 107 - October 2011 - (pdf - 0.6 MB) - Psi-k

Newsletter 107 - October 2011 - (pdf - 0.6 MB) - Psi-k

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

2.5 Perturbation theory picture assuming no overlap<br />

The factor R −6 in (1) can be understood as arising from two actions of the dipolar field,<br />

each proportional to R −3 , suggesting that this simplest approach relates to second-order<br />

perturbation theory in the inter-system Coulomb interaction . Indeed the application of<br />

standard 2nd order Rayleigh-Schrodinger perturbation theory, regarding the electrons of<br />

one system as distinguishable from those of the other and treating the inter-atom coulomb<br />

potential V as a perturbation, yields the formula<br />

E (2)<br />

AB = − <br />

2π<br />

∫ ∞<br />

0<br />

∫<br />

du<br />

d⃗r 1 d⃗r 1 ′ d⃗r 2 d⃗r ′ 2V (⃗r 1 − ⃗r 2 )χ A (⃗r 1 ,⃗r 1 ′ , iu)V (⃗r 2 − ⃗r 1 ) χ B (⃗r 2 ,⃗r 2 ′ , iu)<br />

(2)<br />

where V is the bare electron-electron Coulomb potential and χ A (⃗r 1 ,⃗r 1 ′ , ω) exp(−iωt)<br />

is the linear electron number density response at position ⃗r to an external potential<br />

perturbation of form δV (⃗x) = δ(⃗x − ⃗r ′ ) exp(−iωt): see (e.g.) [25], or [26]. χ A is usually<br />

termed the electron density-density reponse of system A (or just the density response),<br />

and the expression (2) is sometimes known as the ”(generalized) Casimir Polder formula”.<br />

It is derived in a different fashion in Sect. 6.1 below.<br />

By expanding the Coulomb potential in a multipole series around the centres of A and<br />

B, one obtains to lowest order a result of the form (1) with<br />

C 6 = <br />

2π<br />

3∑<br />

jklm=1<br />

∫ ∞<br />

0<br />

A (A)<br />

jk (iu)t jl( ˆR)t (B)<br />

km ( ˆR)A<br />

lm (iu)du, t jl( ˆR) = ˆR j ˆRl − 3δ jl . (3)<br />

(See e.g. [12]). Here R ⃗ is the vector joining the centers of A and B, ˆR = R/ ⃗ ∣R<br />

⃗ ∣ and<br />

∫<br />

A (A)<br />

jl<br />

=<br />

x j x ′ lχ A (⃗x,⃗x ′ , iu)d⃗xd⃗x ′<br />

is the is the dipolar polarizability tensor of species A. ⃗x is the position of an electron<br />

relative to the center of A. For two isotropic systems A (A)<br />

jk<br />

= δ jk A (A) and similarly for<br />

. This leads to the possibly more familiar expression<br />

A (B)<br />

jk<br />

E (2) = −C 6 R −6 ,<br />

C 6 = 3 π<br />

∫ ∞<br />

0<br />

A (A) (iu)A (B) (iu)du . (4)<br />

Using (3) or (4) one reduces the calculation of the asymptotic vdW interaction between<br />

fragments to the calculation of the (imaginary) frequency-dependent dipolar polarizability<br />

A of each fragment. This is a surprisingly demanding task. It can be done accurately<br />

with high-level quantum chemical approaches, but even relatively sophisticated treatments<br />

like RPA or ALDA obtain accuracies only of order 10-20% for small atoms and molecules,<br />

where orbital self-interaction is an issue.<br />

If the multipole expansion of the Coulomb potential in the Casimir-Polder formula (2) is<br />

taken to higher order, additional terms of form C 8 R −8 , and higher powers, are added to<br />

44

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!