General Secretary's - Queensland Police Union
General Secretary's - Queensland Police Union
General Secretary's - Queensland Police Union
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
<strong>Queensland</strong> <strong>Police</strong> <strong>Union</strong> Journal Apr 10 Central Region • 7<br />
we must certainly end it. Going soft in a street fight is<br />
no option. I have just done a series of ESC-directed<br />
interviews involving several of our members over<br />
allegations of excessive force.<br />
Bill FELDMAN<br />
SLIPPAGE DOESN’T MEAN GOING SOFT.<br />
We here in the Central Region have undergone<br />
a series of lectures and meetings with respect<br />
to perceived “slippage”, i.e. slipping back in<br />
old bad habits, taking shortcuts, slackness in<br />
dress and discipline, excessive use of force, and<br />
disrespect for higher ranks – just to name a few.<br />
It appears slippage is one of a myriad of factors that<br />
might indicate a decline in a standard of professionalism<br />
in the QPS.<br />
One of the factors spoken about was the options taken<br />
by staff within our range of Use of Force options. I was<br />
very pleased with the response to my question by our<br />
current Assistant Commissioner, Mr Alan Davey. He<br />
assured me that even though the use of force options<br />
taken by an officer can be scrutinised by the QPS if a<br />
complaint is made, he was under no circumstances<br />
advocating that as police officers we should place<br />
ourselves at risk by going soft. We all know how<br />
embarrassing going soft can be.<br />
“ We all know that when we go<br />
toe-to-toe and blow-for-blow with<br />
any individual, the only successful<br />
outcome for us is to overcome<br />
the threat ”<br />
After all we are fully trained in POST in a huge range<br />
of closed and open-hand tactics that are designed to<br />
inflict enough pain to an individual to force compliance<br />
to our will for that individual and to ensure that our<br />
communication to him or her is fully and clearly<br />
understood.<br />
We all know that when we go toe-to-toe and blow-forblow<br />
with any individual, the only successful outcome<br />
for us is to overcome the threat. We know only too well<br />
the potential of such an altercation – one punch can kill –<br />
and we want to go home at the end of the night.<br />
As I said, we are taught many tactics including some not<br />
so gentlemanly – not so Marquis of Queensbury – style<br />
of fighting (strikes to the knee, elbow, head and palms<br />
as well as blows to very sensitive muscular and nerve<br />
ending areas of the body). We never start the fight but<br />
I have been extremely pleased with the professional way<br />
in which these officers concerned answered their critics<br />
with their knowledge of the UOF model. They answered<br />
the questions directed pointing out their skills and tactics<br />
training and aligning the UOF option with closed and<br />
open-hand tactics, communication, presence, OC spray,<br />
CEW, and firearms. The officers justified the use of each<br />
option used with the actions portrayed by the aggressive<br />
individual attempting to be subdued. Utilising our training<br />
to overcome adversity is the very nature of that training<br />
we have undertaken.<br />
“ <strong>Queensland</strong> is the only state left<br />
in Australia not protecting<br />
its police. Let’s rectify that<br />
dubious oversight ”<br />
Now I am not advocating that running away (Tactical<br />
Withdrawal – another UOF option) under certain<br />
circumstances is not a good thing – after all - I am living<br />
proof that those who slink away get to fight another day<br />
(and with better odds). What I am saying is that those<br />
who fight and overcome should receive the highest<br />
protection that this union can offer when their actions are<br />
scrutinised.<br />
At this time I cannot stress enough to know your UOF<br />
options, know the jargon and description when speaking<br />
of your actions. If in doubt, speak with your union<br />
representative. They may just be the “UOF whisperer”<br />
that can clarify your actions and give you the peace of<br />
mind you need to know - that your actions were tactically<br />
sound, justified, and legally defensible.<br />
One issue this current government or any successive<br />
government must address is protection from both<br />
criminal and civil action for police acting in good faith<br />
when responding to incidents. <strong>Police</strong> do need to know<br />
that when circumstances go wrong technically, legally or<br />
professionally, they do have protection when they show<br />
they acted in good faith. I am talking about redress on<br />
the individual not the organisation. <strong>Queensland</strong> is the<br />
only state left in Australia not protecting its police. Let’s<br />
rectify that dubious oversight.<br />
Work smart, work safe – make it home.<br />
Bill FELDMAN<br />
Regional Representative<br />
Central Region