05.06.2014 Views

General Secretary's - Queensland Police Union

General Secretary's - Queensland Police Union

General Secretary's - Queensland Police Union

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

<strong>Queensland</strong> <strong>Police</strong> <strong>Union</strong> Journal Apr 10 Central Region • 7<br />

we must certainly end it. Going soft in a street fight is<br />

no option. I have just done a series of ESC-directed<br />

interviews involving several of our members over<br />

allegations of excessive force.<br />

Bill FELDMAN<br />

SLIPPAGE DOESN’T MEAN GOING SOFT.<br />

We here in the Central Region have undergone<br />

a series of lectures and meetings with respect<br />

to perceived “slippage”, i.e. slipping back in<br />

old bad habits, taking shortcuts, slackness in<br />

dress and discipline, excessive use of force, and<br />

disrespect for higher ranks – just to name a few.<br />

It appears slippage is one of a myriad of factors that<br />

might indicate a decline in a standard of professionalism<br />

in the QPS.<br />

One of the factors spoken about was the options taken<br />

by staff within our range of Use of Force options. I was<br />

very pleased with the response to my question by our<br />

current Assistant Commissioner, Mr Alan Davey. He<br />

assured me that even though the use of force options<br />

taken by an officer can be scrutinised by the QPS if a<br />

complaint is made, he was under no circumstances<br />

advocating that as police officers we should place<br />

ourselves at risk by going soft. We all know how<br />

embarrassing going soft can be.<br />

“ We all know that when we go<br />

toe-to-toe and blow-for-blow with<br />

any individual, the only successful<br />

outcome for us is to overcome<br />

the threat ”<br />

After all we are fully trained in POST in a huge range<br />

of closed and open-hand tactics that are designed to<br />

inflict enough pain to an individual to force compliance<br />

to our will for that individual and to ensure that our<br />

communication to him or her is fully and clearly<br />

understood.<br />

We all know that when we go toe-to-toe and blow-forblow<br />

with any individual, the only successful outcome<br />

for us is to overcome the threat. We know only too well<br />

the potential of such an altercation – one punch can kill –<br />

and we want to go home at the end of the night.<br />

As I said, we are taught many tactics including some not<br />

so gentlemanly – not so Marquis of Queensbury – style<br />

of fighting (strikes to the knee, elbow, head and palms<br />

as well as blows to very sensitive muscular and nerve<br />

ending areas of the body). We never start the fight but<br />

I have been extremely pleased with the professional way<br />

in which these officers concerned answered their critics<br />

with their knowledge of the UOF model. They answered<br />

the questions directed pointing out their skills and tactics<br />

training and aligning the UOF option with closed and<br />

open-hand tactics, communication, presence, OC spray,<br />

CEW, and firearms. The officers justified the use of each<br />

option used with the actions portrayed by the aggressive<br />

individual attempting to be subdued. Utilising our training<br />

to overcome adversity is the very nature of that training<br />

we have undertaken.<br />

“ <strong>Queensland</strong> is the only state left<br />

in Australia not protecting<br />

its police. Let’s rectify that<br />

dubious oversight ”<br />

Now I am not advocating that running away (Tactical<br />

Withdrawal – another UOF option) under certain<br />

circumstances is not a good thing – after all - I am living<br />

proof that those who slink away get to fight another day<br />

(and with better odds). What I am saying is that those<br />

who fight and overcome should receive the highest<br />

protection that this union can offer when their actions are<br />

scrutinised.<br />

At this time I cannot stress enough to know your UOF<br />

options, know the jargon and description when speaking<br />

of your actions. If in doubt, speak with your union<br />

representative. They may just be the “UOF whisperer”<br />

that can clarify your actions and give you the peace of<br />

mind you need to know - that your actions were tactically<br />

sound, justified, and legally defensible.<br />

One issue this current government or any successive<br />

government must address is protection from both<br />

criminal and civil action for police acting in good faith<br />

when responding to incidents. <strong>Police</strong> do need to know<br />

that when circumstances go wrong technically, legally or<br />

professionally, they do have protection when they show<br />

they acted in good faith. I am talking about redress on<br />

the individual not the organisation. <strong>Queensland</strong> is the<br />

only state left in Australia not protecting its police. Let’s<br />

rectify that dubious oversight.<br />

Work smart, work safe – make it home.<br />

Bill FELDMAN<br />

Regional Representative<br />

Central Region

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!