31.10.2012 Views

Toxicological Review of n-Hexane (CAS No. 110-54-3) (PDF)

Toxicological Review of n-Hexane (CAS No. 110-54-3) (PDF)

Toxicological Review of n-Hexane (CAS No. 110-54-3) (PDF)

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Tissues<br />

Time after exposure (hours) a<br />

0 1 2 4 8<br />

2-Hexanone 0.69 ± 0.13 0.29 ± 0.02 0.11 ± 0.01 0.03 ± 0.01 0.01 ± 0.00 ND ND<br />

2,5-HD 2.41 ± 0.30 1.79 ± 0.10 3.10 ± 0.34 3.61 ± 0.40 2.07 ± 0.09 0.29 ± 0.01 0.16 ± 0.01<br />

Blood<br />

n-<strong>Hexane</strong> 0.45 ± 0.11 0.30 ± 0.05 0.13 ± 0.02 0.04 ± 0.01 ND ND ND<br />

2-Hexanone 0.70 ± 0.10 0.30 ± 0.05 0.10 ± 0.01 0.04 ± 0.01 0.01 ± 0.00 ND ND<br />

2,5-HD 1.06 ± 0.27 0.93 ± 0.12 1.51 ± 0.21 1.73 ± 0.30 0.74 ± 0.09 0.33 ± 0.03 0.14 ± 0.04<br />

Fetus<br />

n-<strong>Hexane</strong> 0.61 ± 0.14 0.31 ± 0.12 ND ND ND ND ND<br />

2-Hexanone 0.51 ± 0.08 0.18 ± 0.00 0.10 ± 0.01 0.03 ± 0.00 0.01 ± 0.00 ND ND<br />

2,5-HD 1.17 ± 0.15 0.97 ± 0.16 1.24 ± 0.09 1.67 ± 0.16 0.80 ± 0.05 0.29 ± 0.07 0.07 ± 0.01<br />

a Values are µg/mL or µg/g wet weight ± SEM.<br />

ND = <strong>No</strong>t detected.<br />

Source: Bus et al., 1979.<br />

The kinetics <strong>of</strong> the metabolism <strong>of</strong> n-hexane has also been investigated in vitro using<br />

microsomal preparations from the liver and lung <strong>of</strong> male Sprague-Dawley rats (T<strong>of</strong>tgard et al.,<br />

1986). The concentrations <strong>of</strong> the metabolic products formed and the reaction velocities were<br />

determined. The kinetic data were plotted using an Eadie-Scatchard transformation. An Eadie-<br />

Scatchard transformation is a plot <strong>of</strong> velocity/substrate concentration on the y-axis against<br />

velocity on the x-axis. It is used to estimate the K m and V max for an enzyme. The estimated<br />

parameters for n-hexane hydroxylation in the liver and lung are presented in Table 3-5.<br />

The values for 1- and 2-hexanol suggested that a two-enzyme system is responsible for<br />

the metabolism <strong>of</strong> n-hexane to these metabolites in liver tissue. The lower a K m value, the higher<br />

the affinity <strong>of</strong> an enzyme for a substrate. The data indicate that one <strong>of</strong> the metabolic enzymes<br />

has a high affinity for n-hexane as a substrate, while the other has a lower affinity. The<br />

metabolite <strong>of</strong> greatest interest in the liver is 2-hexanol because <strong>of</strong> its conversion to<br />

2,5-hexanedione, a toxicologically active metabolite. The enzyme represented by K m1 in Table<br />

3-5 with a K m <strong>of</strong> 6.0 µM is primarily responsible for the production <strong>of</strong> 2-hexanol. The second<br />

enzyme system (K m2) involved in the production <strong>of</strong> 2-hexanol has a K m <strong>of</strong> 1,100 µM and thus a<br />

far lower affinity for n-hexane than the first system. This suggests that the first system is likely<br />

to play the major role in the production <strong>of</strong> 2-hexanol in the liver. The production <strong>of</strong> 1-hexanol in<br />

the liver also appears to involve two enzymes with considerably different affinities for the<br />

substrate. The enzyme represented by K m1 with a K m <strong>of</strong> 0.4 µM has a greater affinity for hexane<br />

12<br />

12<br />

18

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!